Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Constructors
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Equalizer
import Mathlib.Topology.QuasiSeparated
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.CommRingCat
/-!
# Quasi-separated morphisms
A morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y` is quasi-separated if the diagonal morphism `X ⟶ X ×[Y] X` is
quasi-compact.
A scheme is quasi-separated if the intersections of any two affine open sets is quasi-compact.
(`AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine`)
We show that a morphism is quasi-separated if the preimage of every affine open is quasi-separated.
We also show that this property is local at the target,
and is stable under compositions and base-changes.
## Main result
- `AlgebraicGeometry.isLocalization_basicOpen_of_qcqs` (**Qcqs lemma**):
If `U` is qcqs, then `Γ(X, D(f)) ≃ Γ(X, U)_f` for every `f : Γ(X, U)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A morphism is `QuasiSeparated` if diagonal map is quasi-compact. -/
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparated (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism is `QuasiSeparated` if diagonal map is quasi-compact. -/
diagonalQuasiCompact : QuasiCompact (pullback.diagonal f) := by infer_instance
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X ↔ ∀ U V : X.affineOpens, IsCompact (U ∩ V : Set X) := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
constructor
· intro H U V; exact H U V U.1.2 U.2.isCompact V.1.2 V.2.isCompact
· intro H
suffices
∀ (U : X.Opens) (_ : IsCompact U.1) (V : X.Opens) (_ : IsCompact V.1),
IsCompact (U ⊓ V).1
by intro U V hU hU' hV hV'; exact this ⟨U, hU⟩ hU' ⟨V, hV⟩ hV'
intro U hU V hV
refine compact_open_induction_on V hV ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro S _ V hV
change IsCompact (U.1 ∩ (S.1 ∪ V.1))
rw [Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
apply hV.union
clear hV
refine compact_open_induction_on U hU ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro S _ W hW
change IsCompact ((S.1 ∪ W.1) ∩ V.1)
rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
apply hW.union
apply H
theorem quasiCompact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) :
AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal (fun X _ _ _ ↦ CompactSpace X) f ↔
QuasiSeparatedSpace X := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine]
constructor
· intro H U V
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
haveI : IsAffine _ := V.2
let g : pullback U.1.ι V.1.ι ⟶ X := pullback.fst _ _ ≫ U.1.ι
have : IsOpenImmersion g := inferInstance
have e := this.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
erw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe] at e
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
exact @Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _ (H _ _) e
· introv H h₁ h₂
let g : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ X := pullback.fst _ _ ≫ f₁
have : IsOpenImmersion g := inferInstance
have e := this.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
simp_rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at H
exact
@Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _
(H ⟨⟨_, h₁.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, isAffineOpen_opensRange _⟩
⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, isAffineOpen_opensRange _⟩)
e.symm
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact :
@QuasiSeparated = MorphismProperty.diagonal @QuasiCompact := by ext; exact quasiSeparated_iff _
instance : HasAffineProperty @QuasiSeparated (fun X _ _ _ ↦ QuasiSeparatedSpace X) where
__ := HasAffineProperty.copy
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm
(by ext; exact quasiCompact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace _)
instance (priority := 900) quasiSeparatedOfMono {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
QuasiSeparated f where
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ inferInstance
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderBaseChange :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderBaseChange @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ inferInstance
instance quasiSeparatedComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f]
[QuasiSeparated g] : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
theorem quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X := by
rw [HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := @QuasiSeparated)]
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X ↔ QuasiSeparated (terminal.from X) :=
(quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff _).symm
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.fst f g) :=
MorphismProperty.pullback_fst f g inferInstance
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated f] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd f g) :=
MorphismProperty.pullback_snd f g inferInstance
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[hY : QuasiSeparatedSpace Y] [QuasiSeparated f] : QuasiSeparatedSpace X := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated] at hY ⊢
rw [← terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext (f ≫ terminal.from Y) (terminal.from X)]
infer_instance
instance quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : QuasiSeparatedSpace X :=
(quasiSeparatedSpace_congr X.isoSpec.hom.homeomorph).2 PrimeSpectrum.instQuasiSeparatedSpace
theorem IsAffineOpen.isQuasiSeparated {X : Scheme} {U : X.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
IsQuasiSeparated (U : Set X) := by
rw [isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]
exacts [@AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine _ hU, U.isOpen]
lemma quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiCompact_prod_lift :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X ↔ QuasiCompact (prod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X)) := by
rw [← MorphismProperty.cancel_right_of_respectsIso @QuasiCompact _ (prodIsoPullback X X).hom,
← HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (f := terminal.from X) (P := @QuasiSeparated),
quasiSeparated_iff]
congr!
ext : 1 <;> simp
instance [QuasiSeparatedSpace X] : QuasiCompact (prod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X)) := by
rwa [← quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiCompact_prod_lift]
instance [QuasiSeparatedSpace Y] (f g : X ⟶ Y) : QuasiCompact (equalizer.ι f g) :=
MorphismProperty.of_isPullback (P := @QuasiCompact)
(isPullback_equalizer_prod f g).flip inferInstance
instance [CompactSpace X] [QuasiSeparatedSpace Y] (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
CompactSpace (equalizer f g).carrier := by
constructor
simpa using QuasiCompact.isCompact_preimage (f := equalizer.ι f g) _ isOpen_univ isCompact_univ
theorem QuasiSeparated.of_comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g)] :
QuasiSeparated f := by
let 𝒰 := (Z.affineCover.pullbackCover g).bind fun x => Scheme.affineCover _
have (i) : IsAffine (𝒰.obj i) := by dsimp [𝒰]; infer_instance
apply HasAffineProperty.of_openCover
((Z.affineCover.pullbackCover g).bind fun x => Scheme.affineCover _)
rintro ⟨i, j⟩; dsimp at i j
refine @quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated _ _ ?_
(HasAffineProperty.of_isPullback (.of_hasPullback _ (Z.affineCover.map i)) ‹_›) ?_
· exact pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) _ _ (by simp) (Category.comp_id _) ≫
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso g (Z.affineCover.map i) f).hom
· exact inferInstance
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_isAffineOpen (X : Scheme) (U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
(f : Γ(X, U)) (x : Γ(X, X.basicOpen f)) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : Γ(X, U)), y |_ X.basicOpen f = (f |_ X.basicOpen f) ^ n * x := by
have := (hU.isLocalization_basicOpen f).2
obtain ⟨⟨y, _, n, rfl⟩, d⟩ := this x
use n, y
simpa [mul_comm x] using d.symm
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_compact_of_quasi_separated_space_aux_aux {X : TopCat}
(F : X.Presheaf CommRingCat) {U₁ U₂ U₃ U₄ U₅ U₆ U₇ : Opens X} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ}
{y₁ : F.obj (op U₁)} {y₂ : F.obj (op U₂)} {f : F.obj (op <| U₁ ⊔ U₂)}
{x : F.obj (op U₃)} (h₄₁ : U₄ ≤ U₁) (h₄₂ : U₄ ≤ U₂) (h₅₁ : U₅ ≤ U₁) (h₅₃ : U₅ ≤ U₃)
(h₆₂ : U₆ ≤ U₂) (h₆₃ : U₆ ≤ U₃) (h₇₄ : U₇ ≤ U₄) (h₇₅ : U₇ ≤ U₅) (h₇₆ : U₇ ≤ U₆)
(e₁ : y₁ |_ U₅ = (f |_ U₁ |_ U₅) ^ n₁ * x |_ U₅)
(e₂ : y₂ |_ U₆ = (f |_ U₂ |_ U₆) ^ n₂ * x |_ U₆) :
(((f |_ U₁) ^ n₂ * y₁) |_ U₄) |_ U₇ = (((f |_ U₂) ^ n₁ * y₂) |_ U₄) |_ U₇ := by
apply_fun (fun x : F.obj (op U₅) ↦ x |_ U₇) at e₁
apply_fun (fun x : F.obj (op U₆) ↦ x |_ U₇) at e₂
dsimp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply] at e₁ e₂ ⊢
simp only [map_mul, map_pow, ← op_comp, ← F.map_comp, homOfLE_comp, ← CommRingCat.comp_apply]
at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [e₁, e₂, mul_left_comm]
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_compact_of_quasi_separated_space_aux (X : Scheme)
(S : X.affineOpens) (U₁ U₂ : X.Opens) {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} {y₁ : Γ(X, U₁)}
{y₂ : Γ(X, U₂)} {f : Γ(X, U₁ ⊔ U₂)}
{x : Γ(X, X.basicOpen f)} (h₁ : S.1 ≤ U₁) (h₂ : S.1 ≤ U₂)
(e₁ : y₁ |_ X.basicOpen (f |_ U₁) =
((f |_ U₁ |_ X.basicOpen _) ^ n₁) * x |_ X.basicOpen _)
(e₂ : y₂ |_ X.basicOpen (f |_ U₂) =
((f |_ U₂ |_ X.basicOpen _) ^ n₂) * x |_ X.basicOpen _) :
∃ n : ℕ, ∀ m, n ≤ m →
((f |_ U₁) ^ (m + n₂) * y₁) |_ S.1 = ((f |_ U₂) ^ (m + n₁) * y₂) |_ S.1 := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, n, rfl⟩, e⟩ :=
(@IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists _ _ _ _ _ _
(S.2.isLocalization_basicOpen (f |_ S.1))
(((f |_ U₁) ^ n₂ * y₁) |_ S.1)
(((f |_ U₂) ^ n₁ * y₂) |_ S.1)).mp <| by
apply exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_compact_of_quasi_separated_space_aux_aux (e₁ := e₁) (e₂ := e₂)
· show X.basicOpen _ ≤ _
simp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply, Scheme.basicOpen_res]
exact inf_le_inf h₁ le_rfl
· show X.basicOpen _ ≤ _
simp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply, Scheme.basicOpen_res]
exact inf_le_inf h₂ le_rfl
use n
intros m hm
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le hm]
simp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply,
pow_add, map_pow, map_mul, mul_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, homOfLE_comp,
Subtype.coe_mk, ← CommRingCat.comp_apply] at e ⊢
rw [e]
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_isCompact_of_isQuasiSeparated (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : X.Opens)
(hU : IsCompact U.1) (hU' : IsQuasiSeparated U.1) (f : Γ(X, U)) (x : Γ(X, X.basicOpen f)) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : Γ(X, U)), y |_ X.basicOpen f = (f |_ X.basicOpen f) ^ n * x := by
dsimp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply]
revert hU' f x
refine compact_open_induction_on U hU ?_ ?_
· intro _ f x
use 0, f
refine @Subsingleton.elim _
(CommRingCat.subsingleton_of_isTerminal (X.sheaf.isTerminalOfEqEmpty ?_)) _ _
rw [eq_bot_iff]
exact X.basicOpen_le f
· -- Given `f : 𝒪(S ∪ U), x : 𝒪(X_f)`, we need to show that `f ^ n * x` is the restriction of
-- some `y : 𝒪(S ∪ U)` for some `n : ℕ`.
intro S hS U hU hSU f x
-- We know that such `y₁, n₁` exists on `S` by the induction hypothesis.
obtain ⟨n₁, y₁, hy₁⟩ :=
hU (hSU.of_subset Set.subset_union_left) (X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_sup_left).op f)
(X.presheaf.map (homOfLE _).op x)
-- · rw [X.basicOpen_res]; exact inf_le_right
-- We know that such `y₂, n₂` exists on `U` since `U` is affine.
obtain ⟨n₂, y₂, hy₂⟩ :=
exists_eq_pow_mul_of_isAffineOpen X _ U.2 (X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_sup_right).op f)
(X.presheaf.map (homOfLE _).op x)
dsimp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpenCommRingCat_apply] at hy₂
-- swap; · rw [X.basicOpen_res]; exact inf_le_right
-- Since `S ∪ U` is quasi-separated, `S ∩ U` can be covered by finite affine opens.
obtain ⟨s, hs', hs⟩ :=
(isCompactOpen_iff_eq_finset_affine_union _).mp
⟨hSU _ _ Set.subset_union_left S.2 hS Set.subset_union_right U.1.2
U.2.isCompact,
(S ⊓ U.1).2⟩
haveI := hs'.to_subtype
cases nonempty_fintype s
replace hs : S ⊓ U.1 = iSup fun i : s => (i : X.Opens) := by ext1; simpa using hs
have hs₁ : ∀ i : s, i.1.1 ≤ S := by
intro i; change (i : X.Opens) ≤ S
refine le_trans ?_ (inf_le_left (b := U.1))
rw [hs]
exact le_iSup (fun (i : s) => (i : X.Opens)) i
have hs₂ : ∀ i : s, i.1.1 ≤ U.1 := by
intro i; change (i : X.Opens) ≤ U
refine le_trans ?_ (inf_le_right (a := S))
rw [hs]
exact le_iSup (fun (i : s) => (i : X.Opens)) i
-- On each affine open in the intersection, we have `f ^ (n + n₂) * y₁ = f ^ (n + n₁) * y₂`
-- for some `n` since `f ^ n₂ * y₁ = f ^ (n₁ + n₂) * x = f ^ n₁ * y₂` on `X_f`.
have := fun i ↦ exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_compact_of_quasi_separated_space_aux
X i.1 S U (hs₁ i) (hs₂ i) hy₁ hy₂
choose n hn using this
-- We can thus choose a big enough `n` such that `f ^ (n + n₂) * y₁ = f ^ (n + n₁) * y₂`
-- on `S ∩ U`.
have :
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE <| inf_le_left).op
(X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_sup_left).op f ^ (Finset.univ.sup n + n₂) * y₁) =
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE <| inf_le_right).op
(X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_sup_right).op f ^ (Finset.univ.sup n + n₁) * y₂) := by
fapply X.sheaf.eq_of_locally_eq' fun i : s => i.1.1
· refine fun i => homOfLE ?_; rw [hs]
exact le_iSup (fun (i : s) => (i : X.Opens)) i
· exact le_of_eq hs
· intro i
-- This unfolds `X.sheaf`
show (X.presheaf.map _) _ = (X.presheaf.map _) _
simp only [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp]
apply hn
| exact Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_univ _)
use Finset.univ.sup n + n₁ + n₂
-- By the sheaf condition, since `f ^ (n + n₂) * y₁ = f ^ (n + n₁) * y₂`, it can be glued into
-- the desired section on `S ∪ U`.
use (X.sheaf.objSupIsoProdEqLocus S U.1).inv ⟨⟨_ * _, _ * _⟩, this⟩
refine (X.sheaf.objSupIsoProdEqLocus_inv_eq_iff _ _ _ (X.basicOpen_res _
(homOfLE le_sup_left).op) (X.basicOpen_res _ (homOfLE le_sup_right).op)).mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· -- This unfolds `X.sheaf`
show (X.presheaf.map _) _ = (X.presheaf.map _) _
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n₁]
simp only [pow_add, map_pow, map_mul, hy₁, ← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← mul_assoc,
← Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, homOfLE_comp]
· -- This unfolds `X.sheaf`
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiSeparated.lean | 311 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Shift
/-!
# Estimates for the complex logarithm
We show that `log (1+z)` differs from its Taylor polynomial up to degree `n` by at most
`‖z‖^(n+1)/((n+1)*(1-‖z‖))` when `‖z‖ < 1`; see `Complex.norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le`.
To this end, we derive the representation of `log (1+z)` as the integral of `1/(1+tz)`
over the unit interval (`Complex.log_eq_integral`) and introduce notation
`Complex.logTaylor n` for the Taylor polynomial up to degree `n-1`.
## TODO
Refactor using general Taylor series theory, once this exists in Mathlib.
-/
namespace Complex
/-!
### Integral representation of the complex log
-/
lemma continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ ↦ (1 + t • z)⁻¹) (Set.Icc 0 1) :=
ContinuousOn.inv₀ (by fun_prop)
(fun _ ht ↦ slitPlane_ne_zero <| StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)
open intervalIntegral in
| /-- Represent `log (1 + z)` as an integral over the unit interval -/
lemma log_eq_integral {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
log (1 + z) = z * ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0 : ℝ)..1, (1 + t • z)⁻¹ := by
convert (integral_unitInterval_deriv_eq_sub (continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv hz)
(fun _ ht ↦ hasDerivAt_log <|
StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)).symm using 1
simp only [log_one, sub_zero]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/LogBounds.lean | 37 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
/-!
# Orientations of modules
This file defines orientations of modules.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation` is a type synonym for `Module.Ray` for the case where the module is that of
alternating maps from a module to its underlying ring. An orientation may be associated with an
alternating map or with a basis.
* `Module.Oriented` is a type class for a choice of orientation of a module that is considered
the positive orientation.
## Implementation notes
`Orientation` is defined for an arbitrary index type, but the main intended use case is when
that index type is a `Fintype` and there exists a basis of the same cardinality.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientation_(vector_space)
-/
noncomputable section
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι ι' : Type*)
/-- An orientation of a module, intended to be used when `ι` is a `Fintype` with the same
cardinality as a basis. -/
abbrev Orientation := Module.Ray R (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R)
/-- A type class fixing an orientation of a module. -/
class Module.Oriented where
/-- Fix a positive orientation. -/
positiveOrientation : Orientation R M ι
export Module.Oriented (positiveOrientation)
variable {R M}
/-- An equivalence between modules implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R N ι :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domLCongr R R ι R e
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.map ι e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.compLinearMap e.symm) (mt (v.compLinearEquiv_eq_zero_iff e.symm).mp hv) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_refl : (Orientation.map ι <| LinearEquiv.refl R M) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.map, AlternatingMap.domLCongr_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(Orientation.map ι e).symm = Orientation.map ι e.symm := rfl
section Reindex
variable (R M) {ι ι'}
/-- An equivalence between indices implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι') : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R M ι' :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ R e
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_apply (e : ι ≃ ι') (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.domDomCongr e) (mt (v.domDomCongr_eq_zero_iff e).mp hv) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_refl : (Orientation.reindex R M <| Equiv.refl ι) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.reindex, AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_symm (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(Orientation.reindex R M e).symm = Orientation.reindex R M e.symm :=
rfl
end Reindex
/-- A module is canonically oriented with respect to an empty index type. -/
instance (priority := 100) IsEmpty.oriented [IsEmpty ι] : Module.Oriented R M ι where
positiveOrientation :=
rayOfNeZero R (AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty 1) <|
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.injective.ne (by exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_positiveOrientation_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
Orientation.map ι f positiveOrientation = positiveOrientation := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
Orientation.map ι f x = x := by
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h g hg =>
rw [Orientation.map_apply]
congr
ext i
rw [AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply]
congr
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M N : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.map_neg {ι : Type*} (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.map ι f (-x) = -Orientation.map ι f x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.reindex_neg {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (-x) = -Orientation.reindex R M e x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
namespace Basis
variable {ι ι' : Type*}
/-- The value of `Orientation.map` when the index type has the cardinality of a basis, in terms
of `f.det`. -/
theorem map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul [Finite ι] (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι)
(f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : Orientation.map ι f x = (LinearEquiv.det f)⁻¹ • x := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
letI := Classical.decEq ι
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h g hg =>
rw [Orientation.map_apply, smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, Units.smul_def,
(g.compLinearMap f.symm).eq_smul_basis_det e, g.eq_smul_basis_det e,
AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply, AlternatingMap.smul_apply,
show (fun i ↦ (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap (e i)) = (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap ∘ e
by rfl, Basis.det_comp, Basis.det_self, mul_one, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul,
LinearEquiv.coe_inv_det]
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι']
/-- The orientation given by a basis. -/
protected def orientation (e : Basis ι R M) : Orientation R M ι :=
rayOfNeZero R _ e.det_ne_zero
|
theorem orientation_map (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(e.map f).orientation = Orientation.map ι f e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.map_apply, Basis.det_map']
theorem orientation_reindex (e : Basis ι R M) (eι : ι ≃ ι') :
(e.reindex eι).orientation = Orientation.reindex R M eι e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.reindex_apply, Basis.det_reindex']
/-- The orientation given by a basis derived using `units_smul`, in terms of the product of those
units. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Orientation.lean | 161 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Main definitions
- `MvPowerSeries.C`: constant power series
- `MvPowerSeries.X`: the indeterminates
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff`, `MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff`:
the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries`, its constant coefficient
- `MvPowerSeries.monomial`: the monomials
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul`: computes the coefficients of the product of two `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod` : computes the coefficients of products of `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_pow` : computes the coefficients of powers of a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent`: if the constant coefficient
of a `MvPowerSeries` is nilpotent, then some coefficients of its powers are automatically zero
- `MvPowerSeries.map`: apply a `RingHom` to the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries` (as a `RingHom)
- `MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff`, `MvPowerSeries.X_dvd_iff`: equivalent
conditions for (a power of) an indeterminate to divide a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPolynomial.toMvPowerSeries`: the canonical coercion from `MvPolynomial` to `MvPowerSeries`
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
theorem coeff_apply (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R d f = f d :=
rfl
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
dsimp only [coeff, MvPowerSeries]
rw [monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m), LinearMap.single_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_same _ _
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_coeff_zero {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
f = 0 ↔ (∀ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f = 0) :=
MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff_exists_coeff_ne_zero (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
f ≠ 0 ↔ (∃ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f ≠ 0) := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, ne_eq, coeff_zero, not_forall]
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
| have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 243 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
| @[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 130 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
| theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 435 | 435 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
| Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 599 | 600 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
| have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,160 | 1,161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Sum
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Tactic.CC
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we continue the work on equivalences begun in `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean`, defining
a lot of equivalences between various types and operations on these equivalences.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Mathlib/Algebra/Equiv/TransferInstance.lean` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
universe u v w z
open Function
-- Unless required to be `Type*`, all variables in this file are `Sort*`
variable {α α₁ α₂ β β₁ β₂ γ δ : Sort*}
namespace Equiv
/-- The product over `Option α` of `β a` is the binary product of the
product over `α` of `β (some α)` and `β none` -/
@[simps]
def piOptionEquivProd {α} {β : Option α → Type*} :
(∀ a : Option α, β a) ≃ β none × ∀ a : α, β (some a) where
toFun f := (f none, fun a => f (some a))
invFun x a := Option.casesOn a x.fst x.snd
left_inv f := funext fun a => by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv x := by simp
section subtypeCongr
/-- Combines an `Equiv` between two subtypes with an `Equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtypeCongr {α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x }) (f : { x // ¬p x } ≃ { x // ¬q x }) : Perm α :=
(sumCompl p).symm.trans ((sumCongr e f).trans (sumCompl q))
variable {ε : Type*} {p : ε → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
variable (ep ep' : Perm { a // p a }) (en en' : Perm { a // ¬p a })
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def Perm.subtypeCongr : Equiv.Perm ε :=
permCongr (sumCompl p) (sumCongr ep en)
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.apply (a : ε) : ep.subtypeCongr en a =
if h : p a then (ep ⟨a, h⟩ : ε) else en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [Perm.subtypeCongr, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype (a : { a // p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply ep en a.property
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype (a : { a // ¬p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply ep en a.property
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.refl :
Perm.subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl { a // p a }) (Equiv.refl { a // ¬p a }) = Equiv.refl ε := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.symm : (ep.subtypeCongr en).symm = Perm.subtypeCongr ep.symm en.symm := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x
· have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
· have : ¬p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en.symm _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.trans :
(ep.subtypeCongr en).trans (ep'.subtypeCongr en')
= Perm.subtypeCongr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x
· have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, this]
· have : ¬p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
end subtypeCongr
section subtypePreimage
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x₀ : { a // p a } → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypePreimage : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ } ≃ ({ a // ¬p a } → β) where
toFun (x : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ }) a := (x : α → β) a
invFun x := ⟨fun a => if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩, funext fun ⟨_, h⟩ => dif_pos h⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
Subtype.val_injective <|
funext fun a => by
dsimp only
split_ifs
· rw [← hx]; rfl
· rfl
right_inv x :=
funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
show dite (p a) _ _ = _ by
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h]
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
end subtypePreimage
section
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `∀ a, β₁ a` and
`∀ a, β₂ a`. -/
@[simps]
def piCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (∀ a, β₁ a) ≃ (∀ a, β₂ a) :=
⟨Pi.map fun a ↦ F a, Pi.map fun a ↦ (F a).symm, fun H => funext <| by simp,
fun H => funext <| by simp⟩
/-- Given `φ : α → β → Sort*`, we have an equivalence between `∀ a b, φ a b` and `∀ b a, φ a b`.
This is `Function.swap` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def piComm (φ : α → β → Sort*) : (∀ a b, φ a b) ≃ ∀ b a, φ a b :=
⟨swap, swap, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem piComm_symm {φ : α → β → Sort*} : (piComm φ).symm = (piComm <| swap φ) :=
rfl
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions).
This is `Sigma.curry` and `Sigma.uncurry` together as an equiv. -/
def piCurry {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) :
(∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ ∀ a b, γ a b where
toFun := Sigma.curry
invFun := Sigma.uncurry
left_inv := Sigma.uncurry_curry
right_inv := Sigma.curry_uncurry
-- `simps` overapplies these but `simps -fullyApplied` under-applies them
@[simp] theorem piCurry_apply {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*)
(f : ∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) :
piCurry γ f = Sigma.curry f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem piCurry_symm_apply {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) (f : ∀ a b, γ a b) :
(piCurry γ).symm f = Sigma.uncurry f :=
rfl
end
section prodCongr
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
-- See also `Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between fibers gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofFiberEquiv {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) : α ≃ β :=
(sigmaFiberEquiv f).symm.trans <| (Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaFiberEquiv g)
theorem ofFiberEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) (a : α) : g (ofFiberEquiv e a) = f a :=
(_ : { b // g b = _ }).property
end prodCongr
section
open Sum
/-- An equivalence that separates out the 0th fiber of `(Σ (n : ℕ), f n)`. -/
def sigmaNatSucc (f : ℕ → Type u) : (Σ n, f n) ≃ f 0 ⊕ Σ n, f (n + 1) :=
⟨fun x =>
@Sigma.casesOn ℕ f (fun _ => f 0 ⊕ Σ n, f (n + 1)) x fun n =>
@Nat.casesOn (fun i => f i → f 0 ⊕ Σ n : ℕ, f (n + 1)) n (fun x : f 0 => Sum.inl x)
fun (n : ℕ) (x : f n.succ) => Sum.inr ⟨n, x⟩,
Sum.elim (Sigma.mk 0) (Sigma.map Nat.succ fun _ => id), by rintro ⟨n | n, x⟩ <;> rfl, by
rintro (x | ⟨n, x⟩) <;> rfl⟩
end
section
open Sum Nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ PUnit`. -/
def natEquivNatSumPUnit : ℕ ≃ ℕ ⊕ PUnit where
toFun n := Nat.casesOn n (inr PUnit.unit) inl
invFun := Sum.elim Nat.succ fun _ => 0
left_inv n := by cases n <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
/-- `ℕ ⊕ PUnit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def natSumPUnitEquivNat : ℕ ⊕ PUnit ≃ ℕ :=
natEquivNatSumPUnit.symm
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def intEquivNatSumNat : ℤ ≃ ℕ ⊕ ℕ where
toFun z := Int.casesOn z inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim Int.ofNat Int.negSucc
left_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
end
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `Unique β`. -/
def uniqueCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α ≃ Unique β where
toFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm
invFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `IsEmpty α` is equivalent to `IsEmpty β`. -/
theorem isEmpty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : IsEmpty α ↔ IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e.symm, fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e⟩
protected theorem isEmpty (e : α ≃ β) [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty α :=
e.isEmpty_congr.mpr ‹_›
section
open Subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `Perm.subtypePerm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def subtypeEquiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // q b } where
toFun a := ⟨e a, (h _).mp a.property⟩
invFun b := ⟨e.symm b, (h _).mpr ((e.apply_symm_apply b).symm ▸ b.property)⟩
left_inv a := Subtype.ext <| by simp
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| by simp
lemma coe_subtypeEquiv_eq_map {X Y} {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} (e : X ≃ Y)
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (e x)) : ⇑(e.subtypeEquiv h) = Subtype.map e (h · |>.mp) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_refl {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (Equiv.refl _ a) := fun _ => Iff.rfl) :
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv h = Equiv.refl { a : α // p a } := by
ext
rfl
-- We use `as_aux_lemma` here to avoid creating large proof terms when using `simp`
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).symm =
e.symm.subtypeEquiv (by as_aux_lemma =>
intro a
convert (h <| e.symm a).symm
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ b : β, q b ↔ r (f b)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).trans (f.subtypeEquiv h')
= (e.trans f).subtypeEquiv (by as_aux_lemma => exact fun a => (h a).trans (h' <| e a)) :=
rfl
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeEquivRight {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x) : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x } :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl _) e
lemma subtypeEquivRight_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // p x }) : subtypeEquivRight e z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mp z.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // q x }) : (subtypeEquivRight e).symm z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mpr z.2⟩ := rfl
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) : { a : α // p (e a) } ≃ { b : β // p b } :=
subtypeEquiv e <| by simp
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // p (e.symm b) } :=
e.symm.subtypeEquivOfSubtype.symm
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtypeEquivProp {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : Subtype p ≃ Subtype q :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl α) fun _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists (p : α → Prop) (q : Subtype p → Prop) :
Subtype q ≃ { a : α // ∃ h : p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨a.1, a.1.2, by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a, hap⟩, haq⟩
exact haq⟩,
fun a => ⟨⟨a, a.2.fst⟩, a.2.snd⟩, fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => rfl⟩
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists p _).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => @exists_prop (q x) (p x)
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype {α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype q :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter p _).trans <| subtypeEquivRight fun _ => and_iff_right_of_imp h
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtypeUnivEquiv {α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) : Subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => ⟨x, h x⟩, fun _ => Subtype.eq rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtypeSigmaEquiv {α} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) : { y : Sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ x :
Subtype q, p x.1 :=
⟨fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun _ => rfl,
fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset {α} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : Subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtypeSigmaEquiv p q).symm.trans <| subtypeUnivEquiv fun x => h x.1 x.2
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : Subtype p, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
calc
_ ≃ Σy : β, { x : α // f x = y } := sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ p fun _ ⟨x, h'⟩ => h' ▸ h x
_ ≃ α := sigmaFiberEquiv f
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (Σ y : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Subtype p :=
calc
(Σy : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Σy :
Subtype q, { x : Subtype p // Subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y } := by {
apply sigmaCongrRight
intro y
apply Equiv.symm
refine (subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _).trans (subtypeEquivRight ?_)
intro x
exact ⟨fun ⟨hp, h'⟩ => congr_arg Subtype.val h', fun h' => ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2),
Subtype.eq h'⟩⟩ }
_ ≃ Subtype p := sigmaFiberEquiv fun x : Subtype p => (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : Subtype q)
/-- A sigma type over an `Option` is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty at none. -/
def sigmaOptionEquivOfSome {α} (p : Option α → Type v) (h : p none → False) :
(Σ x : Option α, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p (some x) :=
haveI h' : ∀ x, p x → x.isSome := by
intro x
cases x
· intro n
exfalso
exact h n
· intro _
exact rfl
(sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ _ h').symm.trans (sigmaCongrLeft' (optionIsSomeEquiv α))
/-- The `Pi`-type `∀ i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`Sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def piEquivSubtypeSigma (ι) (π : ι → Type*) :
(∀ i, π i) ≃ { f : ι → Σ i, π i // ∀ i, (f i).1 = i } where
toFun := fun f => ⟨fun i => ⟨i, f i⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
invFun := fun f i => by rw [← f.2 i]; exact (f.1 i).2
left_inv := fun _ => funext fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| funext fun i =>
Sigma.eq (hf i).symm <| eq_of_heq <| rec_heq_of_heq _ <| by simp
/-- The type of functions `f : ∀ a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the type of functions `∀ a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtypePiEquivPi {β : α → Sort v} {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} :
{ f : ∀ a, β a // ∀ a, p a (f a) } ≃ ∀ a, { b : β a // p a b } where
toFun := fun f a => ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩
invFun := fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).1, fun a => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro f
funext a
exact Subtype.ext_val rfl
end
section subtypeEquivCodomain
variable {X Y : Sort*} [DecidableEq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
{ g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } ≃ Y :=
(subtypePreimage _ f).trans <|
@funUnique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } _ <|
show Unique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } from
@Equiv.unique _ _
(show Unique { x' // x' = x } from {
default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h })
(subtypeEquivRight fun _ => not_not)
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
(subtypeEquivCodomain f : _ → Y) =
fun g : { g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } => (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (g) :
subtypeEquivCodomain f g = (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm : Y → _) = fun y =>
⟨fun x' => if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y, by
funext x'
simp only [ne_eq, dite_not, comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro w
exfalso
exact x'.property w⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
(f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
end subtypeEquivCodomain
instance : CanLift (α → β) (α ≃ β) (↑) Bijective where prf f hf := ⟨ofBijective f hf, rfl⟩
section
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : Perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α' ≃ Subtype p)
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → Subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `Set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `Equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `Equiv.of_leftInverse'` or `Equiv.of_leftInverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `Equiv.ofInjective` in the general case.
-/
def Perm.extendDomain : Perm β' :=
(permCongr f e).subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl _)
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_image (a : α') : e.extendDomain f (f a) = f (e a) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extendDomain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬p b) : e.extendDomain f b = b := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_refl : Perm.extendDomain (Equiv.refl _) f = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_symm : (e.extendDomain f).symm = Perm.extendDomain e.symm f :=
rfl
theorem Perm.extendDomain_trans (e e' : Perm α') :
(e.extendDomain f).trans (e'.extendDomain f) = Perm.extendDomain (e.trans e') f := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, permCongr_trans]
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype (p₁ : α → Prop) {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)}
(p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂.r x y ↔ s₁.r x y) : {x // p₂ x} ≃ Quotient s₂ where
toFun a :=
Quotient.hrecOn a.1 (fun a h => ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(fun a b hab => hfunext (by rw [Quotient.sound hab]) fun _ _ _ =>
heq_of_eq (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))
a.2
invFun a :=
Quotient.liftOn a (fun a => (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : { x // p₂ x })) fun _ _ hab =>
Subtype.ext_val (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))
left_inv := by exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn a (fun b hb => rfl) ha
right_inv a := by exact Quotient.inductionOn a fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y)
(x hx) : subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h ⟨⟦x⟧, hx⟩ = ⟦⟨x, (hp₂ _).2 hx⟩⟧ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) (x) :
(subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h).symm ⟦x⟧ = ⟨⟦x⟧, (hp₂ _).1 x.property⟩ :=
rfl
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- A helper function for `Equiv.swap`. -/
def swapCore (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b else if r = b then a else r
theorem swapCore_self (r a : α) : swapCore a a r = r := by
unfold swapCore
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
theorem swapCore_swapCore (r a b : α) : swapCore a b (swapCore a b r) = r := by
unfold swapCore; split_ifs <;> cc
theorem swapCore_comm (r a b : α) : swapCore a b r = swapCore b a r := by
unfold swapCore; split_ifs <;> cc
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : Perm α :=
⟨swapCore a b, swapCore a b, fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b,
fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b⟩
@[simp]
theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun r => swapCore_self r a
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext fun r => swapCore_comm r _ _
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a := by
by_cases h : b = a <;> simp [swap_apply_def, h]
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x := by
simp +contextual [swap_apply_def]
theorem eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self {a b x : α} (h : swap a b x ≠ x) : x = a ∨ x = b := by
contrapose! h
exact swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h.1 h.2
@[simp]
theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun _ => swapCore_swapCore _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = Equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => (Equiv.refl _).injective ?_, fun h => h ▸ swap_self _⟩
rw [← h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : Perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x := by
cases π
rfl
theorem swap_eq_update (i j : α) : (Equiv.swap i j : α → α) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext fun x => by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, Equiv.swap_apply_def, id]
theorem comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ Equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) := by
rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_swap_trans [DecidableEq β] (a b : α) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.symm.trans (swap a b)).trans e = swap (e a) (e b) :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by
have : ∀ a, e.symm x = a ↔ x = e a := fun a => by
rw [@eq_comm _ (e.symm x)]
constructor <;> intros <;> simp_all
simp only [trans_apply, swap_apply_def, this]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem trans_swap_trans_symm [DecidableEq β] (a b : β) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.trans (swap a b)).trans e.symm = swap (e.symm a) (e.symm b) :=
symm_trans_swap_trans a b e.symm
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_self (i j a : α) : swap i j (swap i j a) = a := by
rw [← Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.swap_swap, Equiv.refl_apply]
/-- A function is invariant to a swap if it is equal at both elements -/
theorem apply_swap_eq_self {v : α → β} {i j : α} (hv : v i = v j) (k : α) :
v (swap i j k) = v k := by
by_cases hi : k = i
· rw [hi, swap_apply_left, hv]
by_cases hj : k = j
· rw [hj, swap_apply_right, hv]
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hi hj]
theorem swap_apply_eq_iff {x y z w : α} : swap x y z = w ↔ z = swap x y w := by
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, symm_swap]
theorem swap_apply_ne_self_iff {a b x : α} : swap a b x ≠ x ↔ a ≠ b ∧ (x = a ∨ x = b) := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
by_cases hax : x = a
· simp [hax, eq_comm]
by_cases hbx : x = b
· simp [hbx]
simp [hab, hax, hbx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
namespace Perm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_swap_refl {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : α) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.swap i j) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inl, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inl.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl_swap {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : β) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.swap i j) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inr, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inr.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
end Perm
/-- Augment an equivalence with a prescribed mapping `f a = b` -/
def setValue (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : α ≃ β :=
(swap a (f.symm b)).trans f
@[simp]
theorem setValue_eq (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : setValue f a b a = b := by
simp [setValue, swap_apply_left]
end Swap
end Equiv
namespace Function.Involutive
/-- Convert an involutive function `f` to a permutation with `toFun = invFun = f`. -/
def toPerm (f : α → α) (h : Involutive f) : Equiv.Perm α :=
⟨f, f, h.leftInverse, h.rightInverse⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPerm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f : α → α) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPerm_symm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f).symm = h.toPerm f :=
rfl
theorem toPerm_involutive {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : Involutive (h.toPerm f) :=
h
theorem symm_eq_self_of_involutive (f : Equiv.Perm α) (h : Involutive f) : f.symm = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective (h.leftInverse_iff.mp f.left_inv)
end Function.Involutive
theorem PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq {x : PLift α} {y : α} : x = PLift.up y ↔ x.down = y :=
Equiv.plift.eq_symm_apply
theorem Function.Injective.map_swap [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
f (Equiv.swap x y z) = Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
conv_rhs => rw [Equiv.swap_apply_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [hf h₁, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
· rw [hf h₂, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
· rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (mt (congr_arg f) h₁) (mt (congr_arg f) h₂)]
namespace Equiv
section
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
-/
@[simps apply, simps -isSimp symm_apply]
def piCongrLeft' (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) : (∀ a, P a) ≃ ∀ b, P (e.symm b) where
toFun f x := f (e.symm x)
invFun f x := (e.symm_apply_apply x).ndrec (f (e x))
left_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), h.ndrec (f y) = f x) (e.symm_apply_apply x)
right_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), (congr_arg e.symm h).ndrec (f y) = f x)
(e.apply_symm_apply x)
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e.symm (e a) = a` in the statement of this lemma. -/
add_decl_doc Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- This lemma is impractical to state in the dependent case. -/
@[simp]
theorem piCongrLeft'_symm (P : Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) :
(piCongrLeft' (fun _ => P) e).symm = piCongrLeft' _ e.symm := by ext; simp [piCongrLeft']
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `a` is of the form `e.symm b`, so we can use `g b` instead of
`g (e (e.symm b))`. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) (g : ∀ b, P (e.symm b)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g (e.symm b) = g b := by
rw [piCongrLeft'_symm_apply, ← heq_iff_eq, rec_heq_iff_heq]
exact congr_arg_heq _ (e.apply_symm_apply _)
end
section
variable (P : β → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
-/
def piCongrLeft : (∀ a, P (e a)) ≃ ∀ b, P b :=
(piCongrLeft' P e.symm).symm
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e (e.symm b) = b` in the statement of this lemma. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f b = e.apply_symm_apply b ▸ f (e.symm b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_symm_apply (g : ∀ b, P b) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e).symm g a = g (e a) :=
piCongrLeft'_apply P e.symm g a
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `b` is of the form `e a`, so we can use `f a` instead of
`f (e.symm (e a))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f (e a) = f a :=
piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply P e.symm f a
open Sum
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast {P : β → Sort v} {e : α ≃ β}
(f : (a : α) → P (e a)) (b : β) :
piCongrLeft P e f b = cast (congr_arg P (e.apply_symm_apply b)) (f (e.symm b)) :=
Eq.rec_eq_cast _ _
theorem piCongrLeft_sumInl {ι ι' ι''} (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (i : ι) :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inl i)) = f i := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inl i)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
theorem piCongrLeft_sumInr {ι ι' ι''} (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (j : ι') :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inr j)) = g j := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inr j)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias piCongrLeft_sum_inl := piCongrLeft_sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias piCongrLeft_sum_inr := piCongrLeft_sumInr
| end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, W a ≃ Z (h₁ a))
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Basic.lean | 841 | 846 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
| simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 500 | 511 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
end Distrib
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddMonoid` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using already-proved extensionality lemmas.
congr; ext : 1; assumption
theorem toDistrib_injective : Function.Injective (@toDistrib R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalSemiring
/-! ### NonAssocSemiring and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddMonoidWithOne`, `AddCommMonoidWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas.
-/
/- TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
namespace NonAssocSemiring
/- The best place to prove that the `NatCast` is determined by the other operations is probably in
an extensionality lemma for `AddMonoidWithOne`, in which case we may as well do the typeclasses
defined in `Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean` as well. -/
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h_zero : (inst₁.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero = (inst₂.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero :=
congrArg (fun inst => (inst.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero) h
have h_one' : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne :=
congrArg (@MulOneClass.toOne R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_mul
have h_one : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one :=
congrArg (@One.one R) h_one'
have : inst₁.toAddCommMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommMonoidWithOne := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast :=
congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
-- Split into `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `One` and `natCast` instances.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddCommGroup` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
congr; (ext : 1; assumption)
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
-- Use above extensionality lemma to prove injectivity by showing that `h_add` and `h_mul` hold.
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-! ### NonUnitalRing -/
namespace NonUnitalRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonUnitalRing
/-! ### NonAssocRing and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddGroupWithOne`, `AddCommGroupWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddCommGroup = inst₂.toAddCommGroup :=
AddCommGroup.ext h_add
have : inst₁.toAddGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddGroupWithOne :=
AddGroupWithOne.ext h_add h_one
injection this with _ h_addMonoidWithOne; injection h_addMonoidWithOne
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
namespace NonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Mathematically non-trivial fact: `intCast` is determined by the rest.
have h₃ : inst₁.toAddCommGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommGroupWithOne :=
AddCommGroupWithOne.ext h_add (congrArg (·.toOne.one) h₂)
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocRing
/-! ### Semiring -/
namespace Semiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Semiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₃ : (inst₁.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid = (inst₂.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid := by
ext : 1; exact h_mul
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Semiring
/-! ### Ring -/
namespace Ring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Ring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toSemiring = inst₂.toSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
/- We prove that the `SubNegMonoid`s are equal because they are one
field away from `Sub` and `Neg`, enabling use of `injection`. -/
have h₃ : (inst₁.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid
= (inst₂.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid :=
congrArg (@AddGroup.toSubNegMonoid R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalRing R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
theorem toSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Ring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalCommSemiring
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommSemiring` in Mathlib.
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocRing.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
/-! ### NonUnitalCommRing -/
namespace NonUnitalCommRing
theorem toNonUnitalRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalCommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalRing_injective <|
NonUnitalRing.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalCommRing
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommRing` in Mathlib.
/-! ### CommSemiring -/
namespace CommSemiring
theorem toSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : CommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toSemiring_injective <|
Semiring.ext h_add h_mul
end CommSemiring
/-! ### CommRing -/
namespace CommRing
theorem toRing_injective : Function.Injective (@toRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : CommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toRing_injective <| Ring.ext h_add h_mul
end CommRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 462 | 466 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure := HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_not_accPt h)]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
| @[deprecated fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot h)]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 543 | 549 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Star
import Mathlib.Tactic.Polyrith
/-!
# The Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality and Tsirelson's inequality.
We establish a version of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality
(which is a generalization of Bell's inequality).
This is a foundational result which implies that
quantum mechanics is not a local hidden variable theory.
As usually stated the CHSH inequality requires substantial language from physics and probability,
but it is possible to give a statement that is purely about ordered `*`-algebras.
We do that here, to avoid as many practical and logical dependencies as possible.
Since the algebra of observables of any quantum system is an ordered `*`-algebra
(in particular a von Neumann algebra) this is a strict generalization of the usual statement.
Let `R` be a `*`-ring.
A CHSH tuple in `R` consists of
* four elements `A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁ : R`, such that
* each `Aᵢ` and `Bⱼ` is a self-adjoint involution, and
* the `Aᵢ` commute with the `Bⱼ`.
The physical interpretation is that the four elements are observables (hence self-adjoint)
that take values ±1 (hence involutions), and that the `Aᵢ` are spacelike separated from the `Bⱼ`
(and hence commute).
The CHSH inequality says that when `R` is an ordered `*`-ring
(that is, a `*`-ring which is ordered, and for every `r : R`, `0 ≤ star r * r`),
which is moreover *commutative*, we have
`A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ 2`
On the other hand, Tsirelson's inequality says that for any ordered `*`-ring we have
`A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ 2√2`
(A caveat: in the commutative case we need 2⁻¹ in the ring,
and in the noncommutative case we need √2 and √2⁻¹.
To keep things simple we just assume our rings are ℝ-algebras.)
The proofs I've seen in the literature either
assume a significant framework for quantum mechanics,
or assume the ring is a `C^*`-algebra.
In the `C^*`-algebra case,
the order structure is completely determined by the `*`-algebra structure:
`0 ≤ A` iff there exists some `B` so `A = star B * B`.
There's a nice proof of both bounds in this setting at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsirelson%27s_bound
The proof given here is purely algebraic.
## Future work
One can show that Tsirelson's inequality is tight.
In the `*`-ring of n-by-n complex matrices, if `A ≤ λ I` for some `λ : ℝ`,
then every eigenvalue has absolute value at most `λ`.
There is a CHSH tuple in 4-by-4 matrices such that
`A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁` has `2√2` as an eigenvalue.
## References
* [Clauser, Horne, Shimony, Holt,
*Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories*][zbMATH06785026]
* [Bell, *On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox*][MR3790629]
* [Tsirelson, *Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality*][MR577178]
-/
universe u
/-- A CHSH tuple in a *-monoid consists of 4 self-adjoint involutions `A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁` such that
the `Aᵢ` commute with the `Bⱼ`.
The physical interpretation is that `A₀` and `A₁` are a pair of boolean observables which
are spacelike separated from another pair `B₀` and `B₁` of boolean observables.
-/
structure IsCHSHTuple {R} [Monoid R] [StarMul R] (A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁ : R) : Prop where
A₀_inv : A₀ ^ 2 = 1
A₁_inv : A₁ ^ 2 = 1
B₀_inv : B₀ ^ 2 = 1
B₁_inv : B₁ ^ 2 = 1
A₀_sa : star A₀ = A₀
A₁_sa : star A₁ = A₁
B₀_sa : star B₀ = B₀
B₁_sa : star B₁ = B₁
A₀B₀_commutes : A₀ * B₀ = B₀ * A₀
A₀B₁_commutes : A₀ * B₁ = B₁ * A₀
A₁B₀_commutes : A₁ * B₀ = B₀ * A₁
A₁B₁_commutes : A₁ * B₁ = B₁ * A₁
variable {R : Type u}
theorem CHSH_id [CommRing R] {A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁ : R} (A₀_inv : A₀ ^ 2 = 1) (A₁_inv : A₁ ^ 2 = 1)
(B₀_inv : B₀ ^ 2 = 1) (B₁_inv : B₁ ^ 2 = 1) :
(2 - A₀ * B₀ - A₀ * B₁ - A₁ * B₀ + A₁ * B₁) * (2 - A₀ * B₀ - A₀ * B₁ - A₁ * B₀ + A₁ * B₁) =
4 * (2 - A₀ * B₀ - A₀ * B₁ - A₁ * B₀ + A₁ * B₁) := by
-- polyrith suggests:
linear_combination
(2 * B₀ * B₁ + 2) * A₀_inv + (B₀ ^ 2 - 2 * B₀ * B₁ + B₁ ^ 2) * A₁_inv +
(A₀ ^ 2 + 2 * A₀ * A₁ + 1) * B₀_inv +
(A₀ ^ 2 - 2 * A₀ * A₁ + 1) * B₁_inv
/-- Given a CHSH tuple (A₀, A₁, B₀, B₁) in a *commutative* ordered `*`-algebra over ℝ,
`A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ 2`.
(We could work over ℤ[⅟2] if we wanted to!)
-/
theorem CHSH_inequality_of_comm [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R] [StarOrderedRing R]
[Algebra ℝ R]
[OrderedSMul ℝ R] (A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁ : R) (T : IsCHSHTuple A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁) :
A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ 2 := by
let P := 2 - A₀ * B₀ - A₀ * B₁ - A₁ * B₀ + A₁ * B₁
have i₁ : 0 ≤ P := by
have idem : P * P = 4 * P := CHSH_id T.A₀_inv T.A₁_inv T.B₀_inv T.B₁_inv
have idem' : P = (1 / 4 : ℝ) • (P * P) := by
have h : 4 * P = (4 : ℝ) • P := by simp [map_ofNat, Algebra.smul_def]
rw [idem, h, ← mul_smul]
norm_num
have sa : star P = P := by
dsimp [P]
simp only [star_add, star_sub, star_mul, star_ofNat, star_one, T.A₀_sa, T.A₁_sa, T.B₀_sa,
T.B₁_sa, mul_comm B₀, mul_comm B₁]
simpa only [← idem', sa]
using smul_nonneg (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 4) (star_mul_self_nonneg P)
apply le_of_sub_nonneg
simpa only [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, ← sub_add] using i₁
/-!
We now prove some rather specialized lemmas in preparation for the Tsirelson inequality,
which we hide in a namespace as they are unlikely to be useful elsewhere.
-/
namespace TsirelsonInequality
/-!
Before proving Tsirelson's bound,
we prepare some easy lemmas about √2.
-/
-- This calculation, which we need for Tsirelson's bound,
-- defeated me. Thanks for the rescue from Shing Tak Lam!
theorem tsirelson_inequality_aux : √2 * √2 ^ 3 = √2 * (2 * (√2)⁻¹ + 4 * ((√2)⁻¹ * 2⁻¹)) := by
ring_nf
rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_gt (Real.sqrt_pos.2 (show (2 : ℝ) > 0 by norm_num)))]
convert congr_arg (· ^ 2) (@Real.sq_sqrt 2 (by norm_num)) using 1 <;>
(try simp only [← pow_mul]) <;> norm_num
theorem sqrt_two_inv_mul_self : (√2)⁻¹ * (√2)⁻¹ = (2⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← mul_inv]
norm_num
end TsirelsonInequality
open TsirelsonInequality
/-- In a noncommutative ordered `*`-algebra over ℝ,
Tsirelson's bound for a CHSH tuple (A₀, A₁, B₀, B₁) is
`A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ 2^(3/2) • 1`.
We prove this by providing an explicit sum-of-squares decomposition
of the difference.
(We could work over `ℤ[2^(1/2), 2^(-1/2)]` if we really wanted to!)
-/
theorem tsirelson_inequality [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R] [StarOrderedRing R]
[Algebra ℝ R]
[OrderedSMul ℝ R] [StarModule ℝ R] (A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁ : R) (T : IsCHSHTuple A₀ A₁ B₀ B₁) :
A₀ * B₀ + A₀ * B₁ + A₁ * B₀ - A₁ * B₁ ≤ √2 ^ 3 • (1 : R) := by
-- abel will create `ℤ` multiplication. We will `simp` them away to `ℝ` multiplication.
have M : ∀ (m : ℤ) (a : ℝ) (x : R), m • a • x = ((m : ℝ) * a) • x := fun m a x => by
rw [← Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul ℝ, ← mul_smul]
let P := (√2)⁻¹ • (A₁ + A₀) - B₀
| let Q := (√2)⁻¹ • (A₁ - A₀) + B₁
have w : √2 ^ 3 • (1 : R) - A₀ * B₀ - A₀ * B₁ - A₁ * B₀ + A₁ * B₁ = (√2)⁻¹ • (P ^ 2 + Q ^ 2) := by
dsimp [P, Q]
-- distribute out all the powers and products appearing on the RHS
simp only [sq, sub_mul, mul_sub, add_mul, mul_add, smul_add, smul_sub]
-- pull all coefficients out to the front, and combine `√2`s where possible
simp only [Algebra.mul_smul_comm, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_smul, sqrt_two_inv_mul_self]
-- replace Aᵢ * Aᵢ = 1 and Bᵢ * Bᵢ = 1
simp only [← sq, T.A₀_inv, T.A₁_inv, T.B₀_inv, T.B₁_inv]
-- move Aᵢ to the left of Bᵢ
simp only [← T.A₀B₀_commutes, ← T.A₀B₁_commutes, ← T.A₁B₀_commutes, ← T.A₁B₁_commutes]
-- collect terms, simplify coefficients, and collect terms again:
abel_nf
-- all terms coincide, but the last one. Simplify all other terms
simp only [M]
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, mul_inv_cancel_of_invertible, Int.cast_one, add_assoc, add_comm,
add_left_comm, one_smul, Int.cast_neg, neg_smul, Int.cast_ofNat]
simp only [← add_assoc, ← add_smul]
-- just look at the coefficients now:
congr
exact mul_left_cancel₀ (by norm_num) tsirelson_inequality_aux
have pos : 0 ≤ (√2)⁻¹ • (P ^ 2 + Q ^ 2) := by
have P_sa : star P = P := by
simp only [P, star_smul, star_add, star_sub, star_id_of_comm, T.A₀_sa, T.A₁_sa, T.B₀_sa,
T.B₁_sa]
have Q_sa : star Q = Q := by
simp only [Q, star_smul, star_add, star_sub, star_id_of_comm, T.A₀_sa, T.A₁_sa, T.B₀_sa,
T.B₁_sa]
have P2_nonneg : 0 ≤ P ^ 2 := by simpa only [P_sa, sq] using star_mul_self_nonneg P
have Q2_nonneg : 0 ≤ Q ^ 2 := by simpa only [Q_sa, sq] using star_mul_self_nonneg Q
exact smul_nonneg (by positivity) (add_nonneg P2_nonneg Q2_nonneg)
apply le_of_sub_nonneg
simpa only [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, ← sub_add, w, Nat.cast_zero] using pos
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/CHSH.lean | 184 | 223 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cardinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
/-!
# The cardinality of the reals
This file shows that the real numbers have cardinality continuum, i.e. `#ℝ = 𝔠`.
We show that `#ℝ ≤ 𝔠` by noting that every real number is determined by a Cauchy-sequence of the
form `ℕ → ℚ`, which has cardinality `𝔠`. To show that `#ℝ ≥ 𝔠` we define an injection from
`{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` with `f ↦ Σ n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`.
We conclude that all intervals with distinct endpoints have cardinality continuum.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.cantorFunction` is the function that sends `f` in `{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` by
`f ↦ Σ' n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`
## Main statements
* `Cardinal.mk_real : #ℝ = 𝔠`: the reals have cardinality continuum.
* `Cardinal.not_countable_real`: the universal set of real numbers is not countable.
We can use this same proof to show that all the other sets in this file are not countable.
* 8 lemmas of the form `mk_Ixy_real` for `x,y ∈ {i,o,c}` state that intervals on the reals
have cardinality continuum.
## Notation
* `𝔠` : notation for `Cardinal.continuum` in locale `Cardinal`, defined in `SetTheory.Continuum`.
## Tags
continuum, cardinality, reals, cardinality of the reals
-/
open Nat Set
open Cardinal
noncomputable section
namespace Cardinal
variable {c : ℝ} {f g : ℕ → Bool} {n : ℕ}
/-- The body of the sum in `cantorFunction`.
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n` if `f n = true`;
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0` if `f n = false`. -/
def cantorFunctionAux (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
cond (f n) (c ^ n) 0
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_true (h : f n = true) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_false (h : f n = false) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0 := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_nonneg (h : 0 ≤ c) : 0 ≤ cantorFunctionAux c f n := by
cases h' : f n
· simp [h']
· simpa [h'] using pow_nonneg h _
theorem cantorFunctionAux_eq (h : f n = g n) :
cantorFunctionAux c f n = cantorFunctionAux c g n := by simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_zero (f : ℕ → Bool) : cantorFunctionAux c f 0 = cond (f 0) 1 0 := by
cases h : f 0 <;> simp [h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) :
(fun n => cantorFunctionAux c f (n + 1)) = fun n =>
c * cantorFunctionAux c (fun n => f (n + 1)) n := by
ext n
cases h : f (n + 1) <;> simp [h, _root_.pow_succ']
theorem summable_cantor_function (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
Summable (cantorFunctionAux c f) := by
apply (summable_geometric_of_lt_one h1 h2).summable_of_eq_zero_or_self
intro n; cases h : f n <;> simp [h]
/-- `cantorFunction c (f : ℕ → Bool)` is `Σ n, f n * c ^ n`, where `true` is interpreted as `1` and
`false` is interpreted as `0`. It is implemented using `cantorFunctionAux`. -/
def cantorFunction (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) : ℝ :=
∑' n, cantorFunctionAux c f n
theorem cantorFunction_le (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) (h3 : ∀ n, f n → g n) :
cantorFunction c f ≤ cantorFunction c g := by
apply (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2).tsum_le_tsum _ (summable_cantor_function g h1 h2)
intro n; cases h : f n
· simp [h, cantorFunctionAux_nonneg h1]
replace h3 : g n = true := h3 n h; simp [h, h3]
theorem cantorFunction_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
cantorFunction c f = cond (f 0) 1 0 + c * cantorFunction c fun n => f (n + 1) := by
rw [cantorFunction, (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2).tsum_eq_zero_add]
rw [cantorFunctionAux_succ, tsum_mul_left, cantorFunctionAux, pow_zero, cantorFunction]
/-- `cantorFunction c` is strictly increasing with if `0 < c < 1/2`, if we endow `ℕ → Bool` with a
lexicographic order. The lexicographic order doesn't exist for these infinitary products, so we
explicitly write out what it means. -/
theorem increasing_cantorFunction (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) {n : ℕ} {f g : ℕ → Bool}
(hn : ∀ k < n, f k = g k) (fn : f n = false) (gn : g n = true) :
cantorFunction c f < cantorFunction c g := by
have h3 : c < 1 := by
apply h2.trans
norm_num
induction' n with n ih generalizing f g
· let f_max : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec false (fun _ _ => true) n
have hf_max : ∀ n, f n → f_max n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [fn] at hn
contradiction
| simp [f_max]
let g_min : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec true (fun _ _ => false) n
have hg_min : ∀ n, g_min n → g n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [gn]
simp at hn
apply (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hf_max).trans_lt
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hg_min)
have : c / (1 - c) < 1 := by
rw [div_lt_one, lt_sub_iff_add_lt]
· convert _root_.add_lt_add h2 h2
norm_num
rwa [sub_pos]
convert this
· rw [cantorFunction_succ _ (le_of_lt h1) h3, div_eq_mul_inv, ←
tsum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt h1) h3]
apply zero_add
· refine (tsum_eq_single 0 ?_).trans ?_
· intro n hn
cases n
· contradiction
simp [g_min]
· exact cantorFunctionAux_zero _
rw [cantorFunction_succ f (le_of_lt h1) h3, cantorFunction_succ g (le_of_lt h1) h3]
rw [hn 0 <| zero_lt_succ n]
apply add_lt_add_left
rw [mul_lt_mul_left h1]
exact ih (fun k hk => hn _ <| Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) fn gn
/-- `cantorFunction c` is injective if `0 < c < 1/2`. -/
theorem cantorFunction_injective (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) :
Function.Injective (cantorFunction c) := by
intro f g hfg
classical
contrapose hfg with h
have : ∃ n, f n ≠ g n := Function.ne_iff.mp h
let n := Nat.find this
have hn : ∀ k : ℕ, k < n → f k = g k := by
intro k hk
apply of_not_not
exact Nat.find_min this hk
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Cardinality.lean | 123 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n + p) :=
monic_of_degree_le n
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H, add_zero])
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic :=
monic_X_pow_add <| (lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le
(by simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true]))
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
namespace Monic
lemma comp (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (h : q.natDegree ≠ 0) : (p.comp q).Monic := by
nontriviality R
have : (p.comp q).natDegree = p.natDegree * q.natDegree :=
natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero <| by simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
rw [Monic.def, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, this, coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree h, hp.leadingCoeff,
hq.leadingCoeff, one_pow, mul_one]
lemma comp_X_add_C (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X + C r)).Monic := by
nontriviality R
refine hp.comp (monic_X_add_C _) fun ha ↦ ?_
rw [natDegree_X_add_C] at ha
exact one_ne_zero ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
| exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 190 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 681 | 685 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
/-!
# Complex trigonometric functions
Basic facts and derivatives for the complex trigonometric functions.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred here, rather than
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for complex trigonometric
functions, or require additional imports which are not available in that file.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter
open scoped Real
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
have h : (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) / 2 = 0 ↔ exp (2 * θ * I) = -1 := by
rw [@div_eq_iff _ _ (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) 2 0 two_ne_zero, zero_mul,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, ← div_eq_iff (exp_ne_zero _), ← exp_sub]
ring_nf
rw [cos, h, ← exp_pi_mul_I, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int, mul_right_comm]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
refine (iff_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ?_).trans (mul_right_inj' <| mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero I_ne_zero)
field_simp; ring
theorem cos_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = k * π := by
rw [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
use k + 1
field_simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq hk]
ring
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use k - 1
field_simp
ring
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ k * π := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
/-- The tangent of a complex number is equal to zero
iff this number is equal to `k * π / 2` for an integer `k`.
Note that this lemma takes into account that we use zero as the junk value for division by zero.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff'`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π / 2 = θ := by
rw [tan, div_eq_zero_iff, ← mul_eq_zero, ← mul_right_inj' two_ne_zero, mul_zero,
← mul_assoc, ← sin_two_mul, sin_eq_zero_iff]
field_simp [mul_comm, eq_comm]
theorem tan_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, (k * π / 2 : ℂ) ≠ θ := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, tan_eq_zero_iff]
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
/-- If the tangent of a complex number is well-defined,
then it is equal to zero iff the number is equal to `k * π` for an integer `k`.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff` for a version that takes into account junk values of `θ`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff' {θ : ℂ} (hθ : cos θ ≠ 0) : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π = θ := by
simp only [tan, hθ, div_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]; simp [eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_cos_iff {x y : ℂ} : cos x = cos y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x :=
calc
cos x = cos y ↔ cos x - cos y = 0 := sub_eq_zero.symm
_ ↔ -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by rw [cos_sub_cos]
_ ↔ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by simp [(by norm_num : (2 : ℂ) ≠ 0)]
_ ↔ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 := or_comm
_ ↔ (∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x) ∨ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π - x := by
apply or_congr <;>
field_simp [sin_eq_zero_iff, (by norm_num : -(2 : ℂ) ≠ 0), eq_sub_iff_add_eq',
sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm (2 : ℂ), mul_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ)]
constructor <;> · rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩; use -k; simp
_ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x := exists_or.symm
theorem sin_eq_sin_iff {x y : ℂ} :
sin x = sin y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = (2 * k + 1) * π - x := by
simp only [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_cos_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
refine exists_congr fun k => or_congr ?_ ?_ <;> refine Eq.congr rfl ?_ <;> field_simp <;> ring
theorem cos_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * (2 * π) = x := by
rw [← cos_zero, eq_comm, cos_eq_cos_iff]
simp [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_neg_one_iff {x : ℂ} : cos x = -1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, π + k * (2 * π) = x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← cos_sub_pi, cos_eq_one_iff]
simp only [eq_sub_iff_add_eq']
theorem sin_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : sin x = 1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, π / 2 + k * (2 * π) = x := by
rw [← cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_one_iff]
simp only [eq_sub_iff_add_eq']
theorem sin_eq_neg_one_iff {x : ℂ} : sin x = -1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, -(π / 2) + k * (2 * π) = x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← cos_add_pi_div_two, cos_eq_one_iff]
simp only [← sub_eq_neg_add, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
theorem tan_add {x y : ℂ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
rcases h with (⟨h1, h2⟩ | ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, ⟨l, rfl⟩⟩)
· rw [tan, sin_add, cos_add, ←
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (mul_ne_zero (cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr h1) (cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr h2)),
add_div, sub_div]
simp only [← div_mul_div_comm, tan, mul_one, one_mul, div_self (cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr h1),
div_self (cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr h2)]
· haveI t := tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
obtain ⟨hx, hy, hxy⟩ := t (2 * k + 1), t (2 * l + 1), t (2 * k + 1 + (2 * l + 1))
simp only [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_two, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_one, hx, hy] at hx hy hxy
rw [hx, hy, add_zero, zero_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_assoc, ←
add_mul (2 * (k : ℂ) + 1) (2 * l + 1) (π / 2), ← mul_div_assoc, hxy]
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℂ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
theorem tan_two_mul {z : ℂ} : tan (2 * z) = (2 : ℂ) * tan z / ((1 : ℂ) - tan z ^ 2) := by
by_cases h : ∀ k : ℤ, z ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2
· rw [two_mul, two_mul, sq, tan_add (Or.inl ⟨h, h⟩)]
· rw [not_forall_not] at h
rw [two_mul, two_mul, sq, tan_add (Or.inr ⟨h, h⟩)]
theorem tan_add_mul_I {x y : ℂ}
(h :
((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y * I ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y * I = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y * I) = (tan x + tanh y * I) / (1 - tan x * tanh y * I) := by
rw [tan_add h, tan_mul_I, mul_assoc]
theorem tan_eq {z : ℂ}
(h :
((∀ k : ℤ, (z.re : ℂ) ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧
∀ l : ℤ, (z.im : ℂ) * I ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, (z.re : ℂ) = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧
∃ l : ℤ, (z.im : ℂ) * I = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan z = (tan z.re + tanh z.im * I) / (1 - tan z.re * tanh z.im * I) := by
convert tan_add_mul_I h; exact (re_add_im z).symm
open scoped Topology
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} :=
continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun _x => id
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
theorem cos_eq_iff_quadratic {z w : ℂ} :
cos z = w ↔ exp (z * I) ^ 2 - 2 * w * exp (z * I) + 1 = 0 := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
field_simp [cos, exp_neg, exp_ne_zero]
refine Eq.congr ?_ rfl
ring
theorem cos_surjective : Function.Surjective cos := by
intro x
obtain ⟨w, w₀, hw⟩ : ∃ w ≠ 0, 1 * (w * w) + -2 * x * w + 1 = 0 := by
rcases exists_quadratic_eq_zero one_ne_zero
⟨_, (cpow_nat_inv_pow _ two_ne_zero).symm.trans <| pow_two _⟩ with
⟨w, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, ?_, hw⟩
rintro rfl
simp only [zero_add, one_ne_zero, mul_zero] at hw
refine ⟨log w / I, cos_eq_iff_quadratic.2 ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ I_ne_zero, exp_log w₀]
convert hw using 1
ring
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : Set.range cos = Set.univ :=
cos_surjective.range_eq
theorem sin_surjective : Function.Surjective sin := by
intro x
rcases cos_surjective x with ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact ⟨z + π / 2, sin_add_pi_div_two z⟩
|
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : Set.range sin = Set.univ :=
sin_surjective.range_eq
end Complex
namespace Real
open scoped Real
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℝ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 :=
mod_cast @Complex.cos_eq_zero_iff θ
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Complex.lean | 195 | 207 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
/-!
# Finite-dimensional subspaces of affine spaces.
This file provides a few results relating to finite-dimensional
subspaces of affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Collinear` defines collinear sets of points as those that span a
subspace of dimension at most 1.
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
open scoped Finset
section AffineSpace'
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable {ι : Type*}
open AffineSubspace Module
variable [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P]
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a finite set is finite-dimensional. -/
theorem finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_of_finite {s : Set P} (h : Set.Finite s) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k s) :=
.span_of_finite k <| h.vsub h
/-- The vector span of a singleton is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_singleton (p : P) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k {p}) :=
finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_of_finite _ (Set.finite_singleton p)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a family indexed by a `Fintype` is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_range [Finite ι] (p : ι → P) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) :=
finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_of_finite k (Set.finite_range _)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a subset of a family indexed by a `Fintype`
is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_image_of_finite [Finite ι] (p : ι → P) (s : Set ι) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k (p '' s)) :=
finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_of_finite k (Set.toFinite _)
/-- The direction of the affine span of a finite set is
finite-dimensional. -/
theorem finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_of_finite {s : Set P} (h : Set.Finite s) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k s).direction :=
(direction_affineSpan k s).symm ▸ finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_of_finite k h
/-- The direction of the affine span of a singleton is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_singleton (p : P) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k {p}).direction := by
rw [direction_affineSpan]
infer_instance
/-- The direction of the affine span of a family indexed by a
`Fintype` is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_range [Finite ι] (p : ι → P) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction :=
finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_of_finite k (Set.finite_range _)
/-- The direction of the affine span of a subset of a family indexed
by a `Fintype` is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_image_of_finite [Finite ι] (p : ι → P) (s : Set ι) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k (p '' s)).direction :=
finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_of_finite k (Set.toFinite _)
/-- An affine-independent family of points in a finite-dimensional affine space is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_fin_dim_affineIndependent [FiniteDimensional k V] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) : Finite ι := by
nontriviality ι; inhabit ι
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p default] at hi
letI : IsNoetherian k V := IsNoetherian.iff_fg.2 inferInstance
exact
(Set.finite_singleton default).finite_of_compl (Set.finite_coe_iff.1 hi.finite_of_isNoetherian)
/-- An affine-independent subset of a finite-dimensional affine space is finite. -/
theorem finite_set_of_fin_dim_affineIndependent [FiniteDimensional k V] {s : Set ι} {f : s → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k f) : s.Finite :=
@Set.toFinite _ s (finite_of_fin_dim_affineIndependent k hi)
variable {k}
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a finite subset of an affinely independent
family has dimension one less than its cardinality. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.finrank_vectorSpan_image_finset [DecidableEq P]
{p : ι → P} (hi : AffineIndependent k p) {s : Finset ι} {n : ℕ} (hc : #s = n + 1) :
finrank k (vectorSpan k (s.image p : Set P)) = n := by
classical
have hi' := hi.range.mono (Set.image_subset_range p ↑s)
have hc' : #(s.image p) = n + 1 := by rwa [s.card_image_of_injective hi.injective]
have hn : (s.image p).Nonempty := by simp [hc', ← Finset.card_pos]
rcases hn with ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩
have hp₁' : p₁ ∈ p '' s := by simpa using hp₁
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k hp₁', ← Finset.coe_singleton,
← Finset.coe_image, ← Finset.coe_sdiff, Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, ← Finset.coe_image]
at hi'
have hc : #(((s.image p).erase p₁).image (· -ᵥ p₁)) = n := by
rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (vsub_left_injective _), Finset.card_erase_of_mem hp₁]
exact Nat.pred_eq_of_eq_succ hc'
rwa [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne k hp₁, finrank_span_finset_eq_card, hc]
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a finite affinely independent family has
dimension one less than its cardinality. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.finrank_vectorSpan [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P} (hi : AffineIndependent k p)
{n : ℕ} (hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 1) : finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) = n := by
classical
rw [← Finset.card_univ] at hc
rw [← Set.image_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_image]
exact hi.finrank_vectorSpan_image_finset hc
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a finite affinely independent family has dimension one less than its
cardinality. -/
lemma AffineIndependent.finrank_vectorSpan_add_one [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) : finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) + 1 = Fintype.card ι := by
rw [hi.finrank_vectorSpan (tsub_add_cancel_of_le _).symm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le] <;>
exact Fintype.card_pos
/-- The `vectorSpan` of a finite affinely independent family whose
cardinality is one more than that of the finite-dimensional space is
`⊤`. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.vectorSpan_eq_top_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one [FiniteDimensional k V]
[Fintype ι] {p : ι → P} (hi : AffineIndependent k p) (hc : Fintype.card ι = finrank k V + 1) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = ⊤ :=
Submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq <| hi.finrank_vectorSpan hc
variable (k)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of `n + 1` points in an indexed family has
dimension at most `n`. -/
theorem finrank_vectorSpan_image_finset_le [DecidableEq P] (p : ι → P) (s : Finset ι) {n : ℕ}
(hc : #s = n + 1) : finrank k (vectorSpan k (s.image p : Set P)) ≤ n := by
classical
have hn : (s.image p).Nonempty := by
rw [Finset.image_nonempty, ← Finset.card_pos, hc]
apply Nat.succ_pos
rcases hn with ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩
rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_finset_right_ne k hp₁]
refine le_trans (finrank_span_finset_le_card (((s.image p).erase p₁).image fun p => p -ᵥ p₁)) ?_
rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (vsub_left_injective p₁), Finset.card_erase_of_mem hp₁,
tsub_le_iff_right, ← hc]
apply Finset.card_image_le
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family of `n + 1` points has
dimension at most `n`. -/
theorem finrank_vectorSpan_range_le [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) {n : ℕ} (hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 1) :
finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) ≤ n := by
classical
rw [← Set.image_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_image]
rw [← Finset.card_univ] at hc
exact finrank_vectorSpan_image_finset_le _ _ _ hc
/-- The `vectorSpan` of an indexed family of `n + 1` points has dimension at most `n`. -/
lemma finrank_vectorSpan_range_add_one_le [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] (p : ι → P) :
finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) + 1 ≤ Fintype.card ι :=
(le_tsub_iff_right <| Nat.succ_le_iff.2 Fintype.card_pos).1 <| finrank_vectorSpan_range_le _ _
(tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| Nat.succ_le_iff.2 Fintype.card_pos).symm
/-- `n + 1` points are affinely independent if and only if their
`vectorSpan` has dimension `n`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_finrank_vectorSpan_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) {n : ℕ}
(hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 1) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) = n := by
classical
have hn : Nonempty ι := by simp [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, hc]
obtain ⟨i₁⟩ := hn
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ i₁,
linearIndependent_iff_card_eq_finrank_span, eq_comm,
vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne k p i₁, Set.finrank]
rw [← Finset.card_univ] at hc
rw [Fintype.subtype_card]
simp [Finset.filter_ne', Finset.card_erase_of_mem, hc]
/-- `n + 1` points are affinely independent if and only if their
`vectorSpan` has dimension at least `n`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_le_finrank_vectorSpan [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) {n : ℕ}
(hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 1) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ n ≤ finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_finrank_vectorSpan_eq k p hc]
constructor
· rintro rfl
rfl
· exact fun hle => le_antisymm (finrank_vectorSpan_range_le k p hc) hle
/-- `n + 2` points are affinely independent if and only if their
`vectorSpan` does not have dimension at most `n`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_not_finrank_vectorSpan_le [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) {n : ℕ}
(hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 2) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ¬finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) ≤ n := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_le_finrank_vectorSpan k p hc, ← Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, lt_iff_not_ge]
/-- `n + 2` points have a `vectorSpan` with dimension at most `n` if
and only if they are not affinely independent. -/
theorem finrank_vectorSpan_le_iff_not_affineIndependent [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) {n : ℕ}
(hc : Fintype.card ι = n + 2) :
finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) ≤ n ↔ ¬AffineIndependent k p :=
(not_iff_comm.1 (affineIndependent_iff_not_finrank_vectorSpan_le k p hc).symm).symm
variable {k}
lemma AffineIndependent.card_le_finrank_succ [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ Module.finrank k (vectorSpan k (Set.range p)) + 1 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [Fintype.card_eq_zero]
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right]
exact (affineIndependent_iff_le_finrank_vectorSpan _ _
(tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 Fintype.card_ne_zero).symm).1 hp
open Finset in
/-- If an affine independent finset is contained in the affine span of another finset, then its
cardinality is at most the cardinality of that finset. -/
lemma AffineIndependent.card_le_card_of_subset_affineSpan {s t : Finset V}
(hs : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) (hst : (s : Set V) ⊆ affineSpan k (t : Set V)) :
#s ≤ #t := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain rfl | ht' := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simpa [Set.subset_empty_iff] using hst
have := hs'.to_subtype
have := ht'.to_set.to_subtype
have direction_le := AffineSubspace.direction_le (affineSpan_mono k hst)
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_coe, direction_affineSpan, direction_affineSpan,
← @Subtype.range_coe _ (s : Set V), ← @Subtype.range_coe _ (t : Set V)] at direction_le
have finrank_le := add_le_add_right (Submodule.finrank_mono direction_le) 1
-- We use `erw` to elide the difference between `↥s` and `↥(s : Set V)}`
erw [hs.finrank_vectorSpan_add_one] at finrank_le
simpa using finrank_le.trans <| finrank_vectorSpan_range_add_one_le _ _
open Finset in
/-- If the affine span of an affine independent finset is strictly contained in the affine span of
another finset, then its cardinality is strictly less than the cardinality of that finset. -/
lemma AffineIndependent.card_lt_card_of_affineSpan_lt_affineSpan {s t : Finset V}
(hs : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V))
(hst : affineSpan k (s : Set V) < affineSpan k (t : Set V)) : #s < #t := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simpa [card_pos] using hst
obtain rfl | ht' := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Set.subset_empty_iff] at hst
have := hs'.to_subtype
have := ht'.to_set.to_subtype
have dir_lt := AffineSubspace.direction_lt_of_nonempty (k := k) hst <| hs'.to_set.affineSpan k
rw [direction_affineSpan, direction_affineSpan,
← @Subtype.range_coe _ (s : Set V), ← @Subtype.range_coe _ (t : Set V)] at dir_lt
have finrank_lt := add_lt_add_right (Submodule.finrank_lt_finrank_of_lt dir_lt) 1
-- We use `erw` to elide the difference between `↥s` and `↥(s : Set V)}`
erw [hs.finrank_vectorSpan_add_one] at finrank_lt
simpa using finrank_lt.trans_le <| finrank_vectorSpan_range_add_one_le _ _
/-- If the `vectorSpan` of a finite subset of an affinely independent
family lies in a submodule with dimension one less than its
cardinality, it equals that submodule. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.vectorSpan_image_finset_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
[DecidableEq P] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) {s : Finset ι} {sm : Submodule k V} [FiniteDimensional k sm]
(hle : vectorSpan k (s.image p : Set P) ≤ sm) (hc : #s = finrank k sm + 1) :
vectorSpan k (s.image p : Set P) = sm :=
Submodule.eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq hle <| hi.finrank_vectorSpan_image_finset hc
/-- If the `vectorSpan` of a finite affinely independent
family lies in a submodule with dimension one less than its
cardinality, it equals that submodule. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.vectorSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) {sm : Submodule k V} [FiniteDimensional k sm]
(hle : vectorSpan k (Set.range p) ≤ sm) (hc : Fintype.card ι = finrank k sm + 1) :
vectorSpan k (Set.range p) = sm :=
Submodule.eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq hle <| hi.finrank_vectorSpan hc
/-- If the `affineSpan` of a finite subset of an affinely independent
family lies in an affine subspace whose direction has dimension one
less than its cardinality, it equals that subspace. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_image_finset_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
[DecidableEq P] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) {s : Finset ι} {sp : AffineSubspace k P}
[FiniteDimensional k sp.direction] (hle : affineSpan k (s.image p : Set P) ≤ sp)
(hc : #s = finrank k sp.direction + 1) : affineSpan k (s.image p : Set P) = sp := by
have hn : s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.card_pos, hc]
apply Nat.succ_pos
refine eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le ?_ ((hn.image p).to_set.affineSpan k) hle
have hd := direction_le hle
rw [direction_affineSpan] at hd ⊢
exact hi.vectorSpan_image_finset_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one hd hc
/-- If the `affineSpan` of a finite affinely independent family lies
in an affine subspace whose direction has dimension one less than its
cardinality, it equals that subspace. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one [Fintype ι] {p : ι → P}
(hi : AffineIndependent k p) {sp : AffineSubspace k P} [FiniteDimensional k sp.direction]
(hle : affineSpan k (Set.range p) ≤ sp) (hc : Fintype.card ι = finrank k sp.direction + 1) :
affineSpan k (Set.range p) = sp := by
classical
rw [← Finset.card_univ] at hc
rw [← Set.image_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_image] at hle ⊢
exact hi.affineSpan_image_finset_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one hle hc
/-- The `affineSpan` of a finite affinely independent family is `⊤` iff the
family's cardinality is one more than that of the finite-dimensional space. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_card_eq_finrank_add_one [FiniteDimensional k V]
[Fintype ι] {p : ι → P} (hi : AffineIndependent k p) :
affineSpan k (Set.range p) = ⊤ ↔ Fintype.card ι = finrank k V + 1 := by
constructor
· intro h_tot
let n := Fintype.card ι - 1
have hn : Fintype.card ι = n + 1 :=
(Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (card_pos_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P h_tot)).symm
rw [hn, ← finrank_top, ← (vectorSpan_eq_top_of_affineSpan_eq_top k V P) h_tot,
← hi.finrank_vectorSpan hn]
· intro hc
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top k V P] at hc
exact hi.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one le_top hc
theorem Affine.Simplex.span_eq_top [FiniteDimensional k V] {n : ℕ} (T : Affine.Simplex k V n)
(hrank : finrank k V = n) : affineSpan k (Set.range T.points) = ⊤ := by
rw [AffineIndependent.affineSpan_eq_top_iff_card_eq_finrank_add_one T.independent,
Fintype.card_fin, hrank]
/-- The `vectorSpan` of adding a point to a finite-dimensional subspace is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_insert (s : AffineSubspace k P)
[FiniteDimensional k s.direction] (p : P) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k (insert p (s : Set P))) := by
rw [← direction_affineSpan, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
rcases (s : Set P).eq_empty_or_nonempty with (hs | ⟨p₀, hp₀⟩)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at hs
rw [hs, bot_coe, span_empty, bot_coe, direction_affineSpan]
convert finiteDimensional_bot k V <;> simp
· rw [affineSpan_coe, direction_affineSpan_insert hp₀]
infer_instance
/-- The direction of the affine span of adding a point to a finite-dimensional subspace is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan_insert (s : AffineSubspace k P)
[FiniteDimensional k s.direction] (p : P) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k (insert p (s : Set P))).direction :=
(direction_affineSpan k (insert p (s : Set P))).symm ▸ finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_insert s p
variable (k)
/-- The `vectorSpan` of adding a point to a set with a finite-dimensional `vectorSpan` is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_insert_set (s : Set P) [FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k s)]
(p : P) : FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k (insert p s)) := by
haveI : FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k s).direction :=
(direction_affineSpan k s).symm ▸ inferInstance
rw [← direction_affineSpan, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, direction_affineSpan]
exact finiteDimensional_vectorSpan_insert (affineSpan k s) p
/-- A set of points is collinear if their `vectorSpan` has dimension
at most `1`. -/
def Collinear (s : Set P) : Prop :=
Module.rank k (vectorSpan k s) ≤ 1
/-- The definition of `Collinear`. -/
theorem collinear_iff_rank_le_one (s : Set P) :
Collinear k s ↔ Module.rank k (vectorSpan k s) ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
variable {k}
/-- A set of points, whose `vectorSpan` is finite-dimensional, is
collinear if and only if their `vectorSpan` has dimension at most
`1`. -/
theorem collinear_iff_finrank_le_one {s : Set P} [FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k s)] :
Collinear k s ↔ finrank k (vectorSpan k s) ≤ 1 := by
have h := collinear_iff_rank_le_one k s
rw [← finrank_eq_rank] at h
exact mod_cast h
alias ⟨Collinear.finrank_le_one, _⟩ := collinear_iff_finrank_le_one
/-- A subset of a collinear set is collinear. -/
theorem Collinear.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set P} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h : Collinear k s₂) : Collinear k s₁ :=
(Submodule.rank_mono (vectorSpan_mono k hs)).trans h
/-- The `vectorSpan` of collinear points is finite-dimensional. -/
theorem Collinear.finiteDimensional_vectorSpan {s : Set P} (h : Collinear k s) :
FiniteDimensional k (vectorSpan k s) :=
IsNoetherian.iff_fg.1
(IsNoetherian.iff_rank_lt_aleph0.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt h Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0))
/-- The direction of the affine span of collinear points is finite-dimensional. -/
theorem Collinear.finiteDimensional_direction_affineSpan {s : Set P} (h : Collinear k s) :
FiniteDimensional k (affineSpan k s).direction :=
(direction_affineSpan k s).symm ▸ h.finiteDimensional_vectorSpan
variable (k P)
/-- The empty set is collinear. -/
theorem collinear_empty : Collinear k (∅ : Set P) := by
rw [collinear_iff_rank_le_one, vectorSpan_empty]
simp
variable {P}
/-- A single point is collinear. -/
theorem collinear_singleton (p : P) : Collinear k ({p} : Set P) := by
rw [collinear_iff_rank_le_one, vectorSpan_singleton]
simp
variable {k}
/-- Given a point `p₀` in a set of points, that set is collinear if and
only if the points can all be expressed as multiples of the same
vector, added to `p₀`. -/
theorem collinear_iff_of_mem {s : Set P} {p₀ : P} (h : p₀ ∈ s) :
Collinear k s ↔ ∃ v : V, ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ r : k, p = r • v +ᵥ p₀ := by
simp_rw [collinear_iff_rank_le_one, rank_submodule_le_one_iff', Submodule.le_span_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv⟩
use v₀
intro p hp
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hv (p -ᵥ p₀) (vsub_mem_vectorSpan k hp h)
use r
rw [eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact hr.symm
· rintro ⟨v, hp₀v⟩
use v
intro w hw
have hs : vectorSpan k s ≤ k ∙ v := by
| rw [vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k h, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def]
intro x hx
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/FiniteDimensional.lean | 434 | 436 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
/-!
# Range of linear maps
The range `LinearMap.range` of a (semi)linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
More specifically, `LinearMap.range` applies to any `SemilinearMapClass` over a `RingHomSurjective`
ring homomorphism.
Note that this also means that dot notation (i.e. `f.range` for a linear map `f`) does not work.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module, range
-/
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} :
range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
theorem range_eq_top_of_surjective [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (hf : Surjective f) :
range f = ⊤ := range_eq_top.2 hf
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
@[simp] lemma range_domRestrict [Module R M₂] (K : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
range (domRestrict f K) = K.map f := by ext; simp
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
| LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 113 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,168 | 2,178 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Bounded.Basic
/-!
# Thickened indicators
This file is about thickened indicators of sets in (pseudo e)metric spaces. For a decreasing
sequence of thickening radii tending to 0, the thickened indicators of a closed set form a
decreasing pointwise converging approximation of the indicator function of the set, where the
members of the approximating sequence are nonnegative bounded continuous functions.
## Main definitions
* `thickenedIndicatorAux δ E`: The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` as an
unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
* `thickenedIndicator δ E`: The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` as a bundled
bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function.
## Main results
* For a sequence of thickening radii tending to 0, the `δ`-thickened indicators of a set `E` tend
pointwise to the indicator of `closure E`.
- `thickenedIndicatorAux_tendsto_indicator_closure`: The version is for the
unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions.
- `thickenedIndicator_tendsto_indicator_closure`: The version is for the bundled `ℝ≥0`-valued
bounded continuous functions.
-/
open NNReal ENNReal Topology BoundedContinuousFunction Set Metric EMetric Filter
noncomputable section thickenedIndicator
variable {α : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` is the function that equals `1` on `E`
and `0` outside a `δ`-thickening of `E` and interpolates (continuously) between
these values using `infEdist _ E`.
`thickenedIndicatorAux` is the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function. See `thickenedIndicator`
for the (bundled) bounded continuous function with `ℝ≥0`-values. -/
def thickenedIndicatorAux (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
fun x : α => (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ
theorem continuous_thickenedIndicatorAux {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
Continuous (thickenedIndicatorAux δ E) := by
unfold thickenedIndicatorAux
let f := fun x : α => (⟨1, infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ⟩ : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0∞)
let sub := fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0∞ => (p.1 : ℝ≥0∞) - p.2
rw [show (fun x : α => (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ) = sub ∘ f by rfl]
apply (@ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub 1).comp
apply (ENNReal.continuous_div_const (ENNReal.ofReal δ) _).comp continuous_infEdist
norm_num [δ_pos]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (x : α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x ≤ 1 := by
apply tsub_le_self (α := ℝ≥0∞)
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} {x : α} :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ _) one_lt_top
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_closure_eq (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ (closure E) = thickenedIndicatorAux δ E := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [thickenedIndicatorAux, infEdist_closure]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_one (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) {x : α} (x_in_E : x ∈ E) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 1 := by
simp [thickenedIndicatorAux, infEdist_zero_of_mem x_in_E, tsub_zero]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_mem : x ∈ closure E) : thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 1 := by
rw [← thickenedIndicatorAux_closure_eq, thickenedIndicatorAux_one δ (closure E) x_mem]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_zero {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_out : x ∉ thickening δ E) : thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 0 := by
rw [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at x_out
unfold thickenedIndicatorAux
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
have key := tsub_le_tsub
(@rfl _ (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).le (ENNReal.div_le_div x_out (@rfl _ (ENNReal.ofReal δ : ℝ≥0∞)).le)
rw [ENNReal.div_self (ne_of_gt (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mpr δ_pos)) ofReal_ne_top] at key
simpa [tsub_self] using key
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ₁ E ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ₂ E :=
fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (@rfl ℝ≥0∞ 1).le (ENNReal.div_le_div rfl.le (ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
theorem indicator_le_thickenedIndicatorAux (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
(E.indicator fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E := by
intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ E
· simp only [h, indicator_of_mem, thickenedIndicatorAux_one δ E h, le_refl]
· simp only [h, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_le]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (subset : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E₁ ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E₂ :=
fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (@rfl ℝ≥0∞ 1).le (ENNReal.div_le_div (infEdist_anti subset) rfl.le)
/-- As the thickening radius δ tends to 0, the δ-thickened indicator of a set E (in α) tends
pointwise (i.e., w.r.t. the product topology on `α → ℝ≥0∞`) to the indicator function of the
closure of E.
This statement is for the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions `thickenedIndicatorAux δ E`, see
`thickenedIndicator_tendsto_indicator_closure` for the version for bundled `ℝ≥0`-valued
bounded continuous functions. -/
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_tendsto_indicator_closure {δseq : ℕ → ℝ}
(δseq_lim : Tendsto δseq atTop (𝓝 0)) (E : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun n => thickenedIndicatorAux (δseq n) E) atTop
(𝓝 (indicator (closure E) fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞))) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
intro x
by_cases x_mem_closure : x ∈ closure E
· simp_rw [thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure _ E x_mem_closure]
rw [show (indicator (closure E) fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) x = 1 by
simp only [x_mem_closure, indicator_of_mem]]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
· rw [show (closure E).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) x = 0 by
simp only [x_mem_closure, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]]
rcases exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure x_mem_closure with ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds] at δseq_lim
specialize δseq_lim ε ε_pos
simp only [dist_zero_right, Real.norm_eq_abs, eventually_atTop] at δseq_lim
rcases δseq_lim with ⟨N, hN⟩
apply tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := N)
intro n n_large
have key : x ∉ thickening ε E := by simpa only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] using ε_lt.le
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
apply (thickenedIndicatorAux_mono (lt_of_abs_lt (hN n n_large)).le E x).trans
exact (thickenedIndicatorAux_zero ε_pos E key).le
/-- The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` is the function that equals `1` on `E`
and `0` outside a `δ`-thickening of `E` and interpolates (continuously) between
these values using `infEdist _ E`.
`thickenedIndicator` is the (bundled) bounded continuous function with `ℝ≥0`-values.
See `thickenedIndicatorAux` for the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function. -/
@[simps]
def thickenedIndicator {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) : α →ᵇ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := fun x : α => (thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x).toNNReal
continuous_toFun := by
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_toNNReal
(continuous_thickenedIndicatorAux δ_pos E)
intro x
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (@thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ δ E x) one_lt_top).ne
map_bounded' := by
use 2
intro x y
rw [NNReal.dist_eq]
apply (abs_sub _ _).trans
rw [NNReal.abs_eq, NNReal.abs_eq, ← one_add_one_eq_two]
have key := @thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ δ E
apply add_le_add <;>
· norm_cast
exact (toNNReal_le_toNNReal (lt_of_le_of_lt (key _) one_lt_top).ne one_ne_top).mpr (key _)
theorem thickenedIndicator.coeFn_eq_comp {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
⇑(thickenedIndicator δ_pos E) = ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E :=
rfl
theorem thickenedIndicator_le_one {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) (x : α) :
thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x ≤ 1 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator.coeFn_eq_comp]
simpa using (toNNReal_le_toNNReal thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne one_ne_top).mpr
(thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one δ E x)
theorem thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_mem : x ∈ closure E) : thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 1 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_apply, thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure δ E x_mem, toNNReal_one]
lemma one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply' {X : Type _} [PseudoEMetricSpace X]
{δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) {F : Set X} {x : X} (hxF : x ∈ closure F) :
1 ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos F x := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure δ_pos F hxF]
lemma one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply (X : Type _) [PseudoEMetricSpace X]
{δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) {F : Set X} {x : X} (hxF : x ∈ F) :
1 ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos F x :=
one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply' δ_pos (subset_closure hxF)
theorem thickenedIndicator_one {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α} (x_in_E : x ∈ E) :
thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 1 :=
thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure _ _ (subset_closure x_in_E)
theorem thickenedIndicator_zero {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_out : x ∉ thickening δ E) : thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 0 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_apply, thickenedIndicatorAux_zero δ_pos E x_out, toNNReal_zero]
theorem indicator_le_thickenedIndicator {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
(E.indicator fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0)) ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos E := by
intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ E
· simp only [h, indicator_of_mem, thickenedIndicator_one δ_pos E h, le_refl]
· simp only [h, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_le]
theorem thickenedIndicator_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (δ₁_pos : 0 < δ₁) (δ₂_pos : 0 < δ₂) (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂)
(E : Set α) : ⇑(thickenedIndicator δ₁_pos E) ≤ thickenedIndicator δ₂_pos E := by
intro x
apply (toNNReal_le_toNNReal thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne).mpr
apply thickenedIndicatorAux_mono hle
theorem thickenedIndicator_subset {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (subset : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
⇑(thickenedIndicator δ_pos E₁) ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos E₂ := fun x =>
(toNNReal_le_toNNReal thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne).mpr
(thickenedIndicatorAux_subset δ subset x)
/-- As the thickening radius δ tends to 0, the δ-thickened indicator of a set E (in α) tends
| pointwise to the indicator function of the closure of E.
Note: This version is for the bundled bounded continuous functions, but the topology is not
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/ThickenedIndicator.lean | 214 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Equitable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Finite equipartitions
This file defines finite equipartitions, the partitions whose parts all are the same size up to a
difference of `1`.
## Main declarations
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition`: Predicate for a `Finpartition` to be an equipartition.
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition.exists_partPreservingEquiv`: part-preserving enumeration of a finset
equipped with an equipartition. Indices of elements in the same part are congruent modulo
the number of parts.
-/
open Finset Fintype
namespace Finpartition
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s)
/-- An equipartition is a partition whose parts are all the same size, up to a difference of `1`. -/
def IsEquipartition : Prop :=
(P.parts : Set (Finset α)).EquitableOn card
theorem isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average :
P.IsEquipartition ↔
∀ a : Finset α, a ∈ P.parts → #a = #s / #P.parts ∨ #a = #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
simp_rw [IsEquipartition, Finset.equitableOn_iff, P.sum_card_parts]
variable {P}
lemma not_isEquipartition :
¬P.IsEquipartition ↔ ∃ a ∈ P.parts, ∃ b ∈ P.parts, #b + 1 < #a := Set.not_equitableOn
theorem _root_.Set.Subsingleton.isEquipartition (h : (P.parts : Set (Finset α)).Subsingleton) :
P.IsEquipartition :=
Set.Subsingleton.equitableOn h _
theorem IsEquipartition.card_parts_eq_average (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ∨ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1 :=
P.isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average.1 hP _ ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_eq_average_iff (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ↔ #t ≠ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
have a := hP.card_parts_eq_average ht
have b : ¬(#t = #s / #P.parts ∧ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1) := by
by_contra h; exact absurd (h.1 ▸ h.2) (lt_add_one _).ne
tauto
theorem IsEquipartition.average_le_card_part (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#s / #P.parts ≤ #t := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le hP ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_le_average_add_one (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t ≤ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le_add_one hP ht
theorem IsEquipartition.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
{p ∈ P.parts | ¬#p = #s / #P.parts + 1} = {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts} := by
ext p
simp only [mem_filter, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hp ↦ (hP.card_part_eq_average_iff hp).symm
/-- An equipartition of a finset with `n` elements into `k` parts has
`n % k` parts of size `n / k + 1`. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.card_large_parts_eq_mod (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
#{p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts + 1} = #s % #P.parts := by
have z := P.sum_card_parts
rw [← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not (s := P.parts) (p := fun x ↦ #x = #s / #P.parts + 1),
hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average, sum_const_nat (m := #s / #P.parts + 1) (by simp),
sum_const_nat (m := #s / #P.parts) (by simp), ← hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average,
mul_add, add_comm, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_one, add_comm #_,
filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card, add_comm] at z
rw [← add_left_inj, Nat.mod_add_div, z]
/-- An equipartition of a finset with `n` elements into `k` parts has
`n - n % k` parts of size `n / k`. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.card_small_parts_eq_mod (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
#{p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts} = #P.parts - #s % #P.parts := by
conv_rhs =>
arg 1
rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (p := fun p ↦ #p = #s / #P.parts + 1)]
rw [hP.card_large_parts_eq_mod, add_tsub_cancel_left, hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average]
/-- There exists an enumeration of an equipartition's parts where
larger parts map to smaller numbers and vice versa. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.exists_partsEquiv (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
∃ f : P.parts ≃ Fin #P.parts, ∀ t, #t.1 = #s / #P.parts + 1 ↔ f t < #s % #P.parts := by
let el := {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts + 1}.equivFin
let es := {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts}.equivFin
simp_rw [mem_filter, hP.card_large_parts_eq_mod] at el
simp_rw [mem_filter, hP.card_small_parts_eq_mod] at es
let sneg :
{x // x ∈ P.parts ∧ ¬#x = #s / #P.parts + 1} ≃ {x // x ∈ P.parts ∧ #x = #s / #P.parts} := by
apply (Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv
simp only [Equiv.refl_apply, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun _ ha ↦ by rw [hP.card_part_eq_average_iff ha, ne_eq]
replace el : { x : P.parts // #x.1 = #s / #P.parts + 1 } ≃
Fin (#s % #P.parts) := (Equiv.Set.sep ..).symm.trans el
| replace es : { x : P.parts // ¬#x.1 = #s / #P.parts + 1 } ≃
Fin (#P.parts - #s % #P.parts) := (Equiv.Set.sep ..).symm.trans (sneg.trans es)
let f := (Equiv.sumCompl _).symm.trans ((el.sumCongr es).trans finSumFinEquiv)
use f.trans (finCongr (Nat.add_sub_of_le P.card_mod_card_parts_le))
intro ⟨p, _⟩
simp_rw [f, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.sumCongr_apply, finCongr_apply, Fin.coe_cast]
by_cases hc : #p = #s / #P.parts + 1 <;> simp [hc]
/-- Given a finset equipartitioned into `k` parts, its elements can be enumerated such that
elements in the same part have congruent indices modulo `k`. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.exists_partPreservingEquiv (hP : P.IsEquipartition) : ∃ f : s ≃ Fin #s,
∀ a b : s, P.part a = P.part b ↔ f a % #P.parts = f b % #P.parts := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := P.exists_enumeration
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := hP.exists_partsEquiv
let z := fun a ↦ #P.parts * (f a).2 + g (f a).1
have gl := fun a ↦ (g (f a).1).2
have less : ∀ a, z a < #s := fun a ↦ by
rcases hP.card_parts_eq_average (f a).1.2 with (c | c)
· calc
_ < #P.parts * ((f a).2 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (gl a) _
_ ≤ #P.parts * (#s / #P.parts) := mul_le_mul_left' (c ▸ (f a).2.2) _
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Equipartition.lean | 114 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Bitwise operations on natural numbers
In the first half of this file, we provide theorems for reasoning about natural numbers from their
bitwise properties. In the second half of this file, we show properties of the bitwise operations
`lor`, `land` and `xor`, which are defined in core.
## Main results
* `eq_of_testBit_eq`: two natural numbers are equal if they have equal bits at every position.
* `exists_most_significant_bit`: if `n ≠ 0`, then there is some position `i` that contains the most
significant `1`-bit of `n`.
* `lt_of_testBit`: if `n` and `m` are numbers and `i` is a position such that the `i`-th bit of
of `n` is zero, the `i`-th bit of `m` is one, and all more significant bits are equal, then
`n < m`.
## Future work
There is another way to express bitwise properties of natural number: `digits 2`. The two ways
should be connected.
## Keywords
bitwise, and, or, xor
-/
open Function
namespace Nat
section
variable {f : Bool → Bool → Bool}
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_left (m : Nat) : bitwise f 0 m = if f false true then m else 0 := by
simp [bitwise]
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_right (n : Nat) : bitwise f n 0 = if f true false then n else 0 := by
unfold bitwise
simp only [ite_self, decide_false, Nat.zero_div, ite_true, ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro ⟨⟩
split_ifs <;> rfl
lemma bitwise_zero : bitwise f 0 0 = 0 := by
simp only [bitwise_zero_right, ite_self]
lemma bitwise_of_ne_zero {n m : Nat} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
bitwise f n m = bit (f (bodd n) (bodd m)) (bitwise f (n / 2) (m / 2)) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
have mod_two_iff_bod x : (x % 2 = 1 : Bool) = bodd x := by
simp only [mod_two_of_bodd, cond]; cases bodd x <;> rfl
simp only [hn, hm, mod_two_iff_bod, ite_false, bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
theorem binaryRec_of_ne_zero {C : Nat → Sort*} (z : C 0) (f : ∀ b n, C n → C (bit b n)) {n}
(h : n ≠ 0) :
binaryRec z f n = bit_decomp n ▸ f (bodd n) (div2 n) (binaryRec z f (div2 n)) := by
cases n using bitCasesOn with
| h b n =>
rw [binaryRec_eq _ _ (by right; simpa [bit_eq_zero_iff] using h)]
generalize_proofs h; revert h
rw [bodd_bit, div2_bit]
simp
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_bit {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (h : f false false = false := by rfl) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
simp only [bit, ite_apply, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
have h4 x : (x + x + 1) / 2 = x := by rw [← two_mul, add_comm]; simp [add_mul_div_left]
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [h4] <;> split_ifs
<;> simp_all +decide [two_mul]
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_zero_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 0 ↔ !a := by
simp
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 1 ↔ a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem lor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ||| bit b n = bit (a || b) (m ||| n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem land_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m &&& bit b n = bit (a && b) (m &&& n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem ldiff_bit : ∀ a m b n, ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && not b) (ldiff m n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem xor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ^^^ bit b n = bit (bne a b) (m ^^^ n) :=
bitwise_bit
attribute [simp] Nat.testBit_bitwise
theorem testBit_lor : ∀ m n k, testBit (m ||| n) k = (testBit m k || testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
theorem testBit_land : ∀ m n k, testBit (m &&& n) k = (testBit m k && testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
@[simp]
theorem testBit_ldiff : ∀ m n k, testBit (ldiff m n) k = (testBit m k && not (testBit n k)) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
attribute [simp] testBit_xor
end
@[simp]
theorem bit_false : bit false = (2 * ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bit_true : bit true = (2 * · + 1) :=
rfl
theorem bit_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} {b : Bool} : n.bit b ≠ 0 ↔ n = 0 → b = true := by
simp
/-- An alternative for `bitwise_bit` which replaces the `f false false = false` assumption
with assumptions that neither `bit a m` nor `bit b n` are `0`
(albeit, phrased as the implications `m = 0 → a = true` and `n = 0 → b = true`) -/
lemma bitwise_bit' {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (a : Bool) (m : Nat) (b : Bool) (n : Nat)
(ham : m = 0 → a = true) (hbn : n = 0 → b = true) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at ham hbn
simp only [ham, hbn, bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff, Bool.decide_coe, ← div2_val, div2_bit, ne_eq,
ite_false]
conv_rhs => simp only [bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
lemma bitwise_eq_binaryRec (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) :
bitwise f =
binaryRec (fun n => cond (f false true) n 0) fun a m Ia =>
binaryRec (cond (f true false) (bit a m) 0) fun b n _ => bit (f a b) (Ia n) := by
funext x y
induction x using binaryRec' generalizing y with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_left, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f xb x hxb ih =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hxb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hxb, bodd_bit, div2_bit, eq_rec_constant]
induction y using binaryRec' with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_right, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f yb y hyb =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hyb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hyb, bitwise_of_ne_zero hxb hyb, bodd_bit, ← div2_val,
div2_bit, eq_rec_constant, ih]
theorem zero_of_testBit_eq_false {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ i, testBit n i = false) : n = 0 := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => rfl | f b n hn => ?_
have : b = false := by simpa using h 0
rw [this, bit_false, hn fun i => by rw [← h (i + 1), testBit_bit_succ]]
theorem testBit_eq_false_of_lt {n i} (h : n < 2 ^ i) : n.testBit i = false := by
simp [testBit, shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Nat.div_eq_of_lt h]
/-- The ith bit is the ith element of `n.bits`. -/
theorem testBit_eq_inth (n i : ℕ) : n.testBit i = n.bits.getI i := by
induction i generalizing n with
| zero =>
simp only [testBit, zero_eq, shiftRight_zero, one_and_eq_mod_two, mod_two_of_bodd,
bodd_eq_bits_head, List.getI_zero_eq_headI]
cases List.headI (bits n) <;> rfl
| succ i ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [← bit_decomp n]
rw [testBit_bit_succ, ih n.div2, div2_bits_eq_tail]
cases n.bits <;> simp
theorem exists_most_significant_bit {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
∃ i, testBit n i = true ∧ ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = false := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => exact False.elim (h rfl) | f b n hn => ?_
by_cases h' : n = 0
· subst h'
rw [show b = true by
revert h
cases b <;> simp]
refine ⟨0, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_zero], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hj)
rw [testBit_bit_succ, zero_testBit]
· obtain ⟨k, ⟨hk, hk'⟩⟩ := hn h'
refine ⟨k + 1, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_succ, hk], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (show j ≠ 0 by intro x; subst x; simp at hj)
exact (testBit_bit_succ _ _ _).trans (hk' _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ hj))
theorem lt_of_testBit {n m : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hn : testBit n i = false) (hm : testBit m i = true)
(hnm : ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = testBit m j) : n < m := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i m with
| z =>
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rintro rfl
simp at hm
| f b n hn' =>
induction m using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i with
| z => exact False.elim (Bool.false_ne_true ((zero_testBit i).symm.trans hm))
| f b' m hm' =>
by_cases hi : i = 0
· subst hi
simp only [testBit_bit_zero] at hn hm
have : n = m :=
eq_of_testBit_eq fun i => by convert hnm (i + 1) (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) using 1
<;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
rw [hn, hm, this, bit_false, bit_true]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
· obtain ⟨i', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hi
simp only [testBit_bit_succ] at hn hm
have := hn' _ hn hm fun j hj => by
convert hnm j.succ (succ_lt_succ hj) using 1 <;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
have this' : 2 * n < 2 * m := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) this Nat.two_pos
cases b <;> cases b'
<;> simp only [bit_false, bit_true]
· exact this'
· exact Nat.lt_add_right 1 this'
· calc
2 * n + 1 < 2 * n + 2 := lt.base _
_ ≤ 2 * m := mul_le_mul_left 2 this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ this'
theorem bitwise_swap {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} :
bitwise (Function.swap f) = Function.swap (bitwise f) := by
funext m n
simp only [Function.swap]
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn generalizing n with | ind m ih => ?_
rcases m with - | m
<;> rcases n with - | n
<;> try rw [bitwise_zero_left, bitwise_zero_right]
· specialize ih ((m+1) / 2) (div_lt_self' ..)
simp [bitwise_of_ne_zero, ih]
/-- If `f` is a commutative operation on bools such that `f false false = false`, then `bitwise f`
is also commutative. -/
theorem bitwise_comm {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (hf : ∀ b b', f b b' = f b' b) (n m : ℕ) :
bitwise f n m = bitwise f m n :=
suffices bitwise f = swap (bitwise f) by conv_lhs => rw [this]
calc
bitwise f = bitwise (swap f) := congr_arg _ <| funext fun _ => funext <| hf _
_ = swap (bitwise f) := bitwise_swap
theorem lor_comm (n m : ℕ) : n ||| m = m ||| n :=
bitwise_comm Bool.or_comm n m
theorem land_comm (n m : ℕ) : n &&& m = m &&& n :=
bitwise_comm Bool.and_comm n m
lemma and_two_pow (n i : ℕ) : n &&& 2 ^ i = (n.testBit i).toNat * 2 ^ i := by
refine eq_of_testBit_eq fun j => ?_
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j <;> cases h : n.testBit i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
· simp [h, testBit_two_pow_of_ne hij]
· simp [h, testBit_two_pow_of_ne hij]
lemma two_pow_and (n i : ℕ) : 2 ^ i &&& n = 2 ^ i * (n.testBit i).toNat := by
rw [mul_comm, land_comm, and_two_pow]
/-- Proving associativity of bitwise operations in general essentially boils down to a huge case
distinction, so it is shorter to use this tactic instead of proving it in the general case. -/
macro "bitwise_assoc_tac" : tactic => set_option hygiene false in `(tactic| (
induction n using Nat.binaryRec generalizing m k with | z => simp | f b n hn => ?_
induction m using Nat.binaryRec with | z => simp | f b' m hm => ?_
induction k using Nat.binaryRec <;>
simp [hn, Bool.or_assoc, Bool.and_assoc, Bool.bne_eq_xor]))
theorem land_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n &&& m) &&& k = n &&& (m &&& k) := by bitwise_assoc_tac
theorem lor_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n ||| m) ||| k = n ||| (m ||| k) := by bitwise_assoc_tac
-- These lemmas match `mul_inv_cancel_right` and `mul_inv_cancel_left`.
theorem xor_cancel_right (n m : ℕ) : (m ^^^ n) ^^^ n = m := by
rw [Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_self, xor_zero]
theorem xor_cancel_left (n m : ℕ) : n ^^^ (n ^^^ m) = m := by
rw [← Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_self, zero_xor]
theorem xor_right_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective (HXor.hXor n : ℕ → ℕ) := fun m m' h => by
rw [← xor_cancel_left n m, ← xor_cancel_left n m', h]
theorem xor_left_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective fun m => m ^^^ n :=
fun m m' (h : m ^^^ n = m' ^^^ n) => by
rw [← xor_cancel_right n m, ← xor_cancel_right n m', h]
@[simp]
theorem xor_right_inj {n m m' : ℕ} : n ^^^ m = n ^^^ m' ↔ m = m' :=
xor_right_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem xor_left_inj {n m m' : ℕ} : m ^^^ n = m' ^^^ n ↔ m = m' :=
xor_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem xor_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} : n ^^^ m = 0 ↔ n = m := by
rw [← Nat.xor_self n, xor_right_inj, eq_comm]
theorem xor_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} : n ^^^ m ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ m :=
xor_eq_zero.not
theorem xor_trichotomy {a b c : ℕ} (h : a ^^^ b ^^^ c ≠ 0) :
b ^^^ c < a ∨ c ^^^ a < b ∨ a ^^^ b < c := by
set v := a ^^^ b ^^^ c with hv
-- The xor of any two of `a`, `b`, `c` is the xor of `v` and the third.
have hab : a ^^^ b = c ^^^ v := by
rw [Nat.xor_comm c, xor_cancel_right]
have hbc : b ^^^ c = a ^^^ v := by
rw [← Nat.xor_assoc, xor_cancel_left]
have hca : c ^^^ a = b ^^^ v := by
rw [hv, Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_comm a, ← Nat.xor_assoc, xor_cancel_left]
-- If `i` is the position of the most significant bit of `v`, then at least one of `a`, `b`, `c`
-- has a one bit at position `i`.
obtain ⟨i, ⟨hi, hi'⟩⟩ := exists_most_significant_bit h
have : testBit a i ∨ testBit b i ∨ testBit c i := by
contrapose! hi
simp_rw [Bool.eq_false_eq_not_eq_true] at hi ⊢
rw [testBit_xor, testBit_xor, hi.1, hi.2.1, hi.2.2]
rfl
-- If, say, `a` has a one bit at position `i`, then `a xor v` has a zero bit at position `i`, but
-- the same bits as `a` in positions greater than `j`, so `a xor v < a`.
obtain h | h | h := this
on_goal 1 => left; rw [hbc]
on_goal 2 => right; left; rw [hca]
on_goal 3 => right; right; rw [hab]
all_goals
refine lt_of_testBit i ?_ h fun j hj => ?_
· rw [testBit_xor, h, hi]
rfl
· simp only [testBit_xor, hi' _ hj, Bool.bne_false]
theorem lt_xor_cases {a b c : ℕ} (h : a < b ^^^ c) : a ^^^ c < b ∨ a ^^^ b < c := by
obtain ha | hb | hc := xor_trichotomy <| Nat.xor_assoc _ _ _ ▸ xor_ne_zero.2 h.ne
exacts [(h.asymm ha).elim, Or.inl <| Nat.xor_comm _ _ ▸ hb, Or.inr hc]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean | 347 | 348 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.MapDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Monoid algebras
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) where
algebraMap := singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
instance isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleOneAlgHom : A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleOneRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap k A)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom (k := k).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
-- The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v) :
V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
rw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
of_apply, h g v]
variable (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
end
end
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f :) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] where
algebraMap := singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
instance isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleZeroAlgHom : k →ₐ[R] k[G]) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleZeroRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k[G]) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom (R := R).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x.toAdd 1) :=
rfl
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
end lift
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two additive magmas, then `Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a
non-unital algebra homomorphism between their additive magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Add G] [Add H] [FunLike F G H] [AddHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₙₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G]
{H F : Type*} [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (AddMonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (AddMonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [AddMonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G₁] [AddMonoid G₂] [AddMonoid G₃] (f : G₁ →+ G₂) (g : G₂ →+ G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`AddMonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃+ H) : A[G] ≃ₐ[k] A[H] :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃+ H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (AddEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- The algebra equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative`. -/
def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicativeAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative k G with
commutes' := fun r => by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative] }
/-- The algebra equivalence between `MonoidAlgebra` and `AddMonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Additive`. -/
def MonoidAlgebra.toAdditiveAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [Monoid G] :
MonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] AddMonoidAlgebra k (Additive G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive k G with commutes' := fun r => by simp [MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive] }
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 622 | 634 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
/-!
# Cauchy sequences and big operators
This file proves some more lemmas about basic Cauchy sequences that involve finite sums.
-/
open Finset IsAbsoluteValue
namespace IsCauSeq
variable {α β : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{f g : ℕ → β} {a : ℕ → α}
lemma of_abv_le (n : ℕ) (hm : ∀ m, n ≤ m → abv (f m) ≤ a m) :
IsCauSeq abs (fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, a i) → IsCauSeq abv fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i := by
intro hg ε ε0
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg (ε / 2) (div_pos ε0 (by norm_num))
exists max n i
intro j ji
have hi₁ := hi j (le_trans (le_max_right n i) ji)
have hi₂ := hi (max n i) (le_max_right n i)
have sub_le :=
abs_sub_le (∑ k ∈ range j, a k) (∑ k ∈ range i, a k) (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k)
have := add_lt_add hi₁ hi₂
rw [abs_sub_comm (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k), add_halves ε] at this
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (le_trans ?_ (le_abs_self _)) sub_le) this
generalize hk : j - max n i = k
clear this hi₂ hi₁ hi ε0 ε hg sub_le
rw [tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le ji] at hk
rw [hk]
dsimp only
clear hk ji j
induction' k with k' hi
· simp [abv_zero abv]
simp only [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Finset.sum_range_succ_comm]
simp only [add_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at hi
exact add_le_add (hm _ (le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (Nat.zero_le _) (le_max_left _ _))) hi
lemma of_abv (hf : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n)) :
IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, f n :=
hf.of_abv_le 0 fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl
theorem _root_.cauchy_product (ha : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n))
(hb : IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, g n) (ε : α) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i : ℕ, ∀ j ≥ i,
abv ((∑ k ∈ range j, f k) * ∑ k ∈ range j, g k -
∑ n ∈ range j, ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), f m * g (n - m)) < ε := by
let ⟨P, hP⟩ := ha.bounded
let ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := hb.bounded
have hP0 : 0 < P := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (hP 0)
have hPε0 : 0 < ε / (2 * P) := div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (2 : α) > 0 by norm_num) hP0)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := hb.cauchy₂ hPε0
have hQε0 : 0 < ε / (4 * Q) :=
div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (0 : α) < 4 by norm_num) (lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)))
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := ha.cauchy₂ hQε0
refine ⟨2 * (max N M + 1), fun K hK ↦ ?_⟩
have h₁ :
(∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ k ∈ range (m + 1), f k * g (m - k)) =
∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ n ∈ range (K - m), f m * g n := by
simpa using sum_range_diag_flip K fun m n ↦ f m * g n
have h₂ :
(fun i ↦ ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), f i * g k) = fun i ↦ f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k := by
simp [Finset.mul_sum]
have h₃ :
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k =
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * (∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k) +
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range K, g k := by
rw [← sum_add_distrib]; simp [(mul_add _ _ _).symm]
have two_mul_two : (4 : α) = 2 * 2 := by norm_num
have hQ0 : Q ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by simp [h, lt_irrefl] at hQε0
have h2Q0 : 2 * Q ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero hQ0
have hε : ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) = ε := by
rw [← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hP0)), two_mul_two, mul_assoc, ← div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ h2Q0, add_halves]
have hNMK : max N M + 1 < K :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by rw [two_mul]; exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (Nat.succ_pos _)) hK
have hKN : N < K :=
calc
N ≤ max N M := le_max_left _ _
_ < max N M + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
_ < K := hNMK
have hsumlesum :
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f i) * (ε / (2 * P)) := by
gcongr with m hmJ
refine le_of_lt <| hN (K - m) (le_tsub_of_add_le_left <| hK.trans' ?_) K hKN.le
rw [two_mul]
gcongr
· exact (mem_range.1 hmJ).le
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_left _ _)
have hsumltP : (∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) < P :=
calc
(∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) = |∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)| :=
Eq.symm (abs_of_nonneg (sum_nonneg fun x _ ↦ abv_nonneg abv (f x)))
_ < P := hP (max N M + 1)
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, sum_mul, ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub, abv_neg abv]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _) ?_
suffices
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) +
((∑ i ∈ range K, abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) -
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) <
ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) by
rw [hε] at this
simpa [abv_mul abv] using this
gcongr
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt hsumlesum
(by rw [← sum_mul, mul_comm]; gcongr)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
calc
(∑ i ∈ range K with max N M + 1 ≤ i,
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ range K with max N M + 1 ≤ i, abv (f i) * (2 * Q) := by
gcongr
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
rw [two_mul, abv_neg abv]
gcongr <;> exact le_of_lt (hQ _)
_ < ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) := by
rw [← sum_mul, ← sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)
gcongr
exact (le_abs_self _).trans_lt <|
hM _ ((Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_right _ _)).trans hNMK.le) _ <|
Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _
variable [Archimedean α]
lemma of_decreasing_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, |f n| ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n.succ ≤ f n) : IsCauSeq abs f := fun ε ε0 ↦ by
classical
| let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Archimedean.arch a ε0
have h : ∃ l, ∀ n ≥ m, a - l • ε < f n :=
⟨k + k + 1, fun n hnm ↦
lt_of_lt_of_le (show a - (k + (k + 1)) • ε < -|f n| from
lt_neg.1 <| (ham n hnm).trans_lt
(by
rw [neg_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt, add_nsmul, add_nsmul, one_nsmul]
exact add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hk (lt_of_le_of_lt hk (lt_add_of_pos_right _ ε0))))
(neg_le.2 <| abs_neg (f n) ▸ le_abs_self _)⟩
let l := Nat.find h
have hl : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≥ m → f n > a - l • ε := Nat.find_spec h
have hl0 : l ≠ 0 := fun hl0 ↦
not_lt_of_ge (ham m le_rfl)
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by have := hl m (le_refl m); simpa [hl0] using this) (le_abs_self (f m)))
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.1 (Nat.find_min h (Nat.pred_lt hl0))
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_lt] at hi
exists i
intro j hj
have hfij : f j ≤ f i := (Nat.rel_of_forall_rel_succ_of_le_of_le (· ≥ ·) hnm hi.1 hj).le
rw [abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 hfij), neg_sub, sub_lt_iff_lt_add']
calc
f i ≤ a - Nat.pred l • ε := hi.2
_ = a - l • ε + ε := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hl0), succ_nsmul, sub_add,
add_sub_cancel_right]
_ < f j + ε := add_lt_add_right (hl j (le_trans hi.1 hj)) _
lemma of_mono_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, |f n| ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n ≤ f n.succ) : IsCauSeq abs f :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/BigOperators.lean | 146 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Basic
/-!
# The monotone sequence of partial supremums of a sequence
For `ι` a preorder in which all bounded-above intervals are finite (such as `ℕ`), and `α` a
`⊔`-semilattice, we define `partialSups : (ι → α) → ι →o α` by the formula
`partialSups f i = (Finset.Iic i).sup' ⋯ f`, where the `⋯` denotes a proof that `Finset.Iic i` is
nonempty. This is a way of spelling `⊔ k ≤ i, f k` which does not require a `α` to have a bottom
element, and makes sense in conditionally-complete lattices (where indexed suprema over sets are
badly-behaved).
Under stronger hypotheses on `α` and `ι`, we show that this coincides with other candidate
definitions, see e.g. `partialSups_eq_biSup`, `partialSups_eq_sup_range`,
and `partialSups_eq_sup'_range`.
We show this construction gives a Galois insertion between functions `ι → α` and monotone functions
`ι →o α`, see `partialSups.gi`.
## Notes
One might dispute whether this sequence should start at `f 0` or `⊥`. We choose the former because:
* Starting at `⊥` requires... having a bottom element.
* `fun f i ↦ (Finset.Iio i).sup f` is already effectively the sequence starting at `⊥`.
* If we started at `⊥` we wouldn't have the Galois insertion. See `partialSups.gi`.
-/
open Finset
variable {α ι : Type*}
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
/-- The monotone sequence whose value at `i` is the supremum of the `f j` where `j ≤ i`. -/
def partialSups (f : ι → α) : ι →o α where
toFun i := (Iic i).sup' nonempty_Iic f
monotone' _ _ hmn := sup'_mono f (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr hmn) nonempty_Iic
lemma partialSups_apply (f : ι → α) (i : ι) :
partialSups f i = (Iic i).sup' nonempty_Iic f :=
rfl
lemma partialSups_iff_forall {f : ι → α} (p : α → Prop)
(hp : ∀ {a b}, p (a ⊔ b) ↔ p a ∧ p b) {i : ι} :
p (partialSups f i) ↔ ∀ j ≤ i, p (f j) := by
classical
rw [partialSups_apply, comp_sup'_eq_sup'_comp (γ := Propᵒᵈ) _ p, sup'_eq_sup]
· show (Iic i).inf (p ∘ f) ↔ _
simp [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
· intro x y
rw [hp]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma partialSups_le_iff {f : ι → α} {i : ι} {a : α} :
partialSups f i ≤ a ↔ ∀ j ≤ i, f j ≤ a :=
partialSups_iff_forall (· ≤ a) sup_le_iff
theorem le_partialSups_of_le (f : ι → α) {i j : ι} (h : i ≤ j) :
f i ≤ partialSups f j :=
partialSups_le_iff.1 le_rfl i h
theorem le_partialSups (f : ι → α) :
f ≤ partialSups f :=
fun _ => le_partialSups_of_le f le_rfl
theorem partialSups_le (f : ι → α) (i : ι) (a : α) (w : ∀ j ≤ i, f j ≤ a) :
partialSups f i ≤ a :=
| partialSups_le_iff.2 w
@[simp]
lemma upperBounds_range_partialSups (f : ι → α) :
upperBounds (Set.range (partialSups f)) = upperBounds (Set.range f) := by
ext a
| Mathlib/Order/PartialSups.lean | 84 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Embedding
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
/-!
# Finite intervals of naturals
This file proves that `ℕ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
## TODO
Some lemmas can be generalized using `OrderedGroup`, `CanonicallyOrderedMul` or `SuccOrder`
and subsequently be moved upstream to `Order.Interval.Finset`.
-/
assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset Nat
variable (a b c : ℕ)
namespace Nat
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ where
finsetIcc a b := ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range'⟩
finsetIco a b := ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range'⟩
finsetIoc a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range'⟩
finsetIoo a b := ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range'⟩
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_range'_1]; omega
theorem Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = ⟨List.range' a (b + 1 - a), List.nodup_range'⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = ⟨List.range' a (b - a), List.nodup_range'⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a), List.nodup_range'⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = ⟨List.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1), List.nodup_range'⟩ :=
rfl
theorem uIcc_eq_range' :
uIcc a b = ⟨List.range' (min a b) (max a b + 1 - min a b), List.nodup_range'⟩ := rfl
theorem Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by
ext b x
rw [mem_Iio, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [← Nat.bot_eq_zero, ← Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
lemma range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : range n = Icc 0 (n - 1) := by
ext b
simp_all only [mem_Icc, zero_le, true_and, mem_range]
exact lt_iff_le_pred (zero_lt_of_ne_zero hn)
theorem _root_.Finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 :=
Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
theorem range_succ_eq_Icc_zero (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = Icc 0 n := by
rw [range_eq_Icc_zero_sub_one _ (Nat.add_one_ne_zero _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
@[simp] lemma card_Icc : #(Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := List.length_range' ..
@[simp] lemma card_Ico : #(Ico a b) = b - a := List.length_range' ..
@[simp] lemma card_Ioc : #(Ioc a b) = b - a := List.length_range' ..
@[simp] lemma card_Ioo : #(Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := List.length_range' ..
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : #(uIcc a b) = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_Icc _ _).trans <| by rw [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_sub] <;> omega
@[simp]
lemma card_Iic : #(Iic b) = b + 1 := by rw [Iic_eq_Icc, card_Icc, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem card_Iio : #(Iio b) = b := by rw [Iio_eq_Ico, card_Ico, Nat.bot_eq_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Icc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ico (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioo (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Iic (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIic : Fintype.card (Set.Iic b) = b + 1 := by simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Iio (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintypeIio : Fintype.card (Set.Iio b) = b := by simp
-- TODO@Yaël: Generalize all the following lemmas to `SuccOrder`
theorem Icc_succ_left : Icc a.succ b = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff]
theorem Ico_succ_right : Ico a b.succ = Icc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Icc, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
theorem Ico_succ_left : Ico a.succ b = Ioo a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, succ_le_iff]
theorem Icc_pred_right {b : ℕ} (h : 0 < b) : Icc a (b - 1) = Ico a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ico, lt_iff_le_pred h]
theorem Ico_succ_succ : Ico a.succ b.succ = Ioc a b := by
ext x
rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_singleton : Ico a (a + 1) = {a} := by rw [Ico_succ_right, Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_pred_singleton {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) : Ico (a - 1) a = {a - 1} := by
rw [← Icc_pred_right _ h, Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_succ_singleton : Ioc b (b + 1) = {b + 1} := by rw [← Nat.Icc_succ_left, Icc_self]
variable {a b c}
lemma mem_Ioc_succ : a ∈ Ioc b (b + 1) ↔ a = b + 1 := by simp
lemma mem_Ioc_succ' (a : Ioc b (b + 1)) : a = ⟨b + 1, mem_Ioc.2 (by omega)⟩ :=
Subtype.val_inj.1 (mem_Ioc_succ.1 a.2)
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (b + 1) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
rw [Ico_succ_right, ← Ico_insert_right h]
theorem Ico_insert_succ_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ico a.succ b) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico_succ_left, ← Ioo_insert_left h]
lemma Icc_insert_succ_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Icc (a + 1) b) = Icc a b := by
ext x
simp only [mem_insert, mem_Icc]
omega
lemma Icc_insert_succ_right (h : a ≤ b + 1) : insert (b + 1) (Icc a b) = Icc a (b + 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_insert, mem_Icc]
omega
theorem image_sub_const_Ico (h : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).image fun x => x - c) = Ico (a - c) (b - c) := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_Ico]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x + c, by omega⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
omega
theorem Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (hac : a ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).image fun x => c - x) = Ico (c + 1 - b) (c + 1 - a) := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_Ico]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨c - x, by omega⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
omega
theorem Ico_succ_left_eq_erase_Ico : Ico a.succ b = erase (Ico a b) a := by
ext x
rw [Ico_succ_left, mem_erase, mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, ← and_assoc, ne_comm,
and_comm (a := a ≠ x), lt_iff_le_and_ne]
theorem mod_injOn_Ico (n a : ℕ) : Set.InjOn (· % a) (Finset.Ico n (n + a)) := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [zero_add, Ico_zero_eq_range]
rintro k hk l hl (hkl : k % a = l % a)
simp only [Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_coe] at hk hl
rwa [mod_eq_of_lt hk, mod_eq_of_lt hl] at hkl
rw [Ico_succ_left_eq_erase_Ico, succ_add, succ_eq_add_one,
Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (by omega)]
rintro k hk l hl (hkl : k % a = l % a)
have ha : 0 < a := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| by rintro rfl; simp at hk
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_erase] at hk hl
rcases hk with ⟨hkn, rfl | hk⟩ <;> rcases hl with ⟨hln, rfl | hl⟩
· rfl
· rw [add_mod_right] at hkl
refine (hln <| ih hl ?_ hkl.symm).elim
simpa using Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (n := n) ha
· rw [add_mod_right] at hkl
suffices k = n by contradiction
refine ih hk ?_ hkl
simpa using Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (n := n) ha
· refine ih ?_ ?_ hkl <;> simp only [Finset.mem_coe, hk, hl]
/-- Note that while this lemma cannot be easily generalized to a type class, it holds for ℤ as
well. See `Int.image_Ico_emod` for the ℤ version. -/
theorem image_Ico_mod (n a : ℕ) : (Ico n (n + a)).image (· % a) = range a := by
| obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [range_zero, add_zero, Ico_self, image_empty]
ext i
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_range, mem_Ico]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact mod_lt i ha.bot_lt
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Nat.lean | 205 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact ENNReal.summable.tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_add ENNReal.summable]
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun _ ht _ hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
instance cofinite.instIsMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated μ.cofinite where
exists_measurable_subset s hs := by
refine ⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, ?_, (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
· rwa [compl_mem_cofinite, measure_toMeasurable]
· rw [compl_subset_comm]
apply subset_toMeasurable
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
section Intervals
theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ico a x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (Ici a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ico_right]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (antitone_const.Ico monotone_id)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α]
[(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ioc x a)) atBot (𝓝 (μ (Iic a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ioc_left]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot (monotone_id.Ioc antitone_const)
theorem tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop [Preorder α] [(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Iic x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ univ)) := by
rw [← iUnion_Iic]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop monotone_Iic
theorem tendsto_measure_Ici_atBot [Preorder α] [(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ici x)) atBot (𝓝 (μ univ)) :=
tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop (α := αᵒᵈ) μ
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_ae_eq_self, measure_mono_null Set.inter_subset_right ha]
theorem Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Icc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' ha).symm.trans (Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' hb)
end Intervals
end
end MeasureTheory
end
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 2,211 | 2,212 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
/-!
# Freiman homomorphisms
In this file, we define Freiman homomorphisms and isomorphism.
An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` such that `f '' A ⊆ B` and
`f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ` for all `x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A` such that
`x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ`. In particular, any `MulHom` is a Freiman homomorphism.
Note a `0`- or `1`-Freiman homomorphism is simply a map, thus a `2`-Freiman homomorphism is the
first interesting case (and the most common). As `n` increases further, the property of being
an `n`-Freiman homomorphism between abelian groups becomes increasingly stronger.
An `n`-Freiman isomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` bijective between `A` and `B`
such that `f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ ↔ x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ` for all
`x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A`. In particular, any `MulEquiv` is a Freiman isomorphism.
They are of interest in additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `IsMulFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsMulFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman isomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman isomorphism.
## Main results
* `isMulFreimanHom_two`: Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms.
* `IsMulFreimanHom.mono`: If `m ≤ n` and `f` is an `n`-Freiman homomorphism, then it is also an
`m`-Freiman homomorphism.
## Implementation notes
In the context of combinatorics, we are interested in Freiman homomorphisms over sets which are not
necessarily closed under addition/multiplication. This means we must parametrize them with a set in
an `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` instead of the `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` itself.
## References
[Yufei Zhao, *18.225: Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics*](https://yufeizhao.com/gtac/)
## TODO
* `MonoidHomClass.isMulFreimanHom` could be relaxed to `MulHom.toFreimanHom` by proving
`(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod` directly by induction instead of going through `f s.prod`.
* Affine maps are Freiman homs.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
open Multiset Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {A A₁ A₂ : Set α}
{B B₁ B₂ : Set β} {C : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {n : ℕ}
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves sums
of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanHom [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.sum = t.sum) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanHom (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.prod = t.prod) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a bijective map which
preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanIso [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum ↔ s.sum = t.sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanIso (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod ↔ s.prod = t.prod
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.isMulFreimanHom (hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f) : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f where
mapsTo := hf.bijOn.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod _s _t hsA htA hs ht := (hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht).2
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₂ where
mapsTo := hf₁.mapsTo.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h' := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (hsA hx)).symm, map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (htA hx)).symm,
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h']
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₂ where
bijOn := hf₁.bijOn.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (hsA hx), map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (htA hx),
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.mul_eq_mul (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 A B f) {a b c d : α}
(ha : a ∈ A) (hb : b ∈ A) (hc : c ∈ A) (hd : d ∈ A) (h : a * b = c * d) :
f a * f b = f c * f d := by
simp_rw [← prod_pair] at h ⊢
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (card_pair _ _) (card_pair _ _) h <;> simp [ha, hb, hc, hd]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.mul_eq_mul (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 A B f) {a b c d : α}
(ha : a ∈ A) (hb : b ∈ A) (hc : c ∈ A) (hd : d ∈ A) :
f a * f b = f c * f d ↔ a * b = c * d := by
simp_rw [← prod_pair]
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (card_pair _ _) (card_pair _ _) <;> simp [ha, hb, hc, hd]
/-- Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_two :
IsMulFreimanHom 2 A B f ↔ MapsTo f A B ∧ ∀ a ∈ A, ∀ b ∈ A, ∀ c ∈ A, ∀ d ∈ A,
a * b = c * d → f a * f b = f c * f d where
mp hf := ⟨hf.mapsTo, fun _ ha _ hb _ hc _ hd ↦ hf.mul_eq_mul ha hb hc hd⟩
mpr hf := ⟨hf.1, by aesop (add simp card_eq_two)⟩
/-- Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homs. -/
@[to_additive "Characterisation of `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma isMulFreimanIso_two :
IsMulFreimanIso 2 A B f ↔ BijOn f A B ∧ ∀ a ∈ A, ∀ b ∈ A, ∀ c ∈ A, ∀ d ∈ A,
f a * f b = f c * f d ↔ a * b = c * d where
mp hf := ⟨hf.bijOn, fun _ ha _ hb _ hc _ hd => hf.mul_eq_mul ha hb hc hd⟩
mpr hf := ⟨hf.1, by aesop (add simp card_eq_two)⟩
@[to_additive] lemma isMulFreimanHom_id (hA : A₁ ⊆ A₂) : IsMulFreimanHom n A₁ A₂ id where
mapsTo := hA
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ h := by simpa using h
@[to_additive] lemma isMulFreimanIso_id : IsMulFreimanIso n A A id where
bijOn := bijOn_id _
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.comp (hg : IsMulFreimanHom n B C g)
(hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f) : IsMulFreimanHom n A C (g ∘ f) where
mapsTo := hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h := by
rw [← map_map, ← map_map]
refine hg.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (by rwa [card_map]) (by rwa [card_map])
(hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.mapsTo (hsA h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.mapsTo (htA h)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanIso.comp (hg : IsMulFreimanIso n B C g)
(hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f) : IsMulFreimanIso n A C (g ∘ f) where
bijOn := hg.bijOn.comp hf.bijOn
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
rw [← map_map, ← map_map]
rw [hg.map_prod_eq_map_prod _ _ (by rwa [card_map]) (by rwa [card_map]),
hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht]
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.bijOn.mapsTo (hsA h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.bijOn.mapsTo (htA h)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.subset (hA : A₁ ⊆ A₂) (hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A₂ B₂ f)
(hf' : MapsTo f A₁ B₁) : IsMulFreimanHom n A₁ B₁ f where
mapsTo := hf'
| __ := hf.comp (isMulFreimanHom_id hA)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.superset (hB : B₁ ⊆ B₂) (hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A B₁ f) :
IsMulFreimanHom n A B₂ f := (isMulFreimanHom_id hB).comp hf
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/FreimanHom.lean | 194 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
/-!
# Non integrable functions
In this file we prove that the derivative of a function that tends to infinity is not interval
integrable, see `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter` and
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`. Then we apply the
latter lemma to prove that the function `fun x => x⁻¹` is integrable on `a..b` if and only if
`a = b` or `0 ∉ [a, b]`.
## Main results
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`: if `f` tends to infinity
along `𝓝[≠] c` and `f' = O(g)` along the same filter, then `g` is not interval integrable on any
nontrivial integral `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`.
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter`: a version of
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured` that works for one-sided
neighborhoods;
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured`: if `1 / (x - c) = O(f)` as `x → c`, `x ≠ c`,
then `f` is not interval integrable on any nontrivial interval `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`;
* `intervalIntegrable_sub_inv_iff`, `intervalIntegrable_inv_iff`: integrability conditions for
`(x - c)⁻¹` and `x⁻¹`.
## Tags
integrable function
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory Topology Interval NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Set Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
variable {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
by convex sets, the norm of `f` tends to infinity along `l`, and `f' = O(g)` along `l`, where `f'`
is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not integrable on any set `k` belonging to `l`.
Auxiliary version assuming that `E` is complete. -/
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux
[CompleteSpace E] {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
intro hgi
obtain ⟨C, hC₀, s, hsl, hsub, hfd, hg⟩ :
∃ (C : ℝ) (_ : 0 ≤ C), ∃ s ∈ l, (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, [[x, y]] ⊆ k) ∧
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], DifferentiableAt ℝ f z) ∧
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], ‖deriv f z‖ ≤ C * ‖g z‖ := by
rcases hfg.exists_nonneg with ⟨C, C₀, hC⟩
have h : ∀ᶠ x : ℝ × ℝ in l ×ˢ l,
∀ y ∈ [[x.1, x.2]], (DifferentiableAt ℝ f y ∧ ‖deriv f y‖ ≤ C * ‖g y‖) ∧ y ∈ k :=
(tendsto_fst.uIcc tendsto_snd).eventually ((hd.and hC.bound).and hl).smallSets
rcases mem_prod_self_iff.1 h with ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hs
exact ⟨C, C₀, s, hsl, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).2, fun x hx y hy z hz =>
(hs x hx y hy z hz).1.1, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).1.2⟩
replace hgi : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) k := by exact hgi.norm.smul C
obtain ⟨c, hc, d, hd, hlt⟩ : ∃ c ∈ s, ∃ d ∈ s, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f d‖ := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem hsl with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : ∀ᶠ x in l, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f x‖ :=
hf.eventually (eventually_gt_atTop _)
exact ⟨c, hc, (this.and hsl).exists.imp fun d hd => ⟨hd.2, hd.1⟩⟩
specialize hsub c hc d hd; specialize hfd c hc d hd
replace hg : ∀ x ∈ Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
fun z hz => hg c hc d hd z ⟨hz.1.le, hz.2⟩
have hg_ae : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict (Ι c d), ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
(ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_uIoc).mono hg
have hsub' : Ι c d ⊆ k := Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Icc_self hsub
have hfi : IntervalIntegrable (deriv f) volume c d := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
have : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) (Ι c d) := IntegrableOn.mono hgi hsub' le_rfl
exact Integrable.mono' this (aestronglyMeasurable_deriv _ _) hg_ae
refine hlt.not_le (sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 ?_)
calc
‖f d‖ - ‖f c‖ ≤ ‖f d - f c‖ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
_ = ‖∫ x in c..d, deriv f x‖ := congr_arg _ (integral_deriv_eq_sub hfd hfi).symm
_ = ‖∫ x in Ι c d, deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_uIoc _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, C * ‖g x‖ :=
setIntegral_mono_on hfi.norm.def' (hgi.mono_set hsub') measurableSet_uIoc hg
_ ≤ ∫ x in k, C * ‖g x‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set hgi
(ae_of_all _ fun x => mul_nonneg hC₀ (norm_nonneg _)) hsub'.eventuallyLE
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter
{f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
| {k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
let a : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] UniformSpace.Completion E := UniformSpace.Completion.toComplₗᵢ
let f' := a ∘ f
have h'd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f' x := by
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx using a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt.comp x hx
have h'f : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f' x‖) l atTop := hf.congr (fun x ↦ by simp [f'])
have h'fg : deriv f' =O[l] g := by
apply IsBigO.trans _ hfg
rw [← isBigO_norm_norm]
suffices (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f' x‖) =ᶠ[l] (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f x‖) by exact this.isBigO
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx
have : deriv f' x = a (deriv f x) := by
rw [fderiv_comp_deriv x _ hx]
· have : fderiv ℝ a (f x) = a.toContinuousLinearMap := a.toContinuousLinearMap.fderiv
simp only [this]
rfl
· exact a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt
simp only [this]
simp
exact not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux l hl h'd h'f h'fg
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/NonIntegrable.lean | 98 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Bounded.Normed
/-!
# Integration of bounded continuous functions
In this file, some results are collected about integrals of bounded continuous functions. They are
mostly specializations of results in general integration theory, but they are used directly in this
specialized form in some other files, in particular in those related to the topology of weak
convergence of probability measures and finite measures.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction Topology
namespace BoundedContinuousFunction
section NNRealValued
|
lemma apply_le_nndist_zero {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (f : X →ᵇ ℝ≥0) (x : X) :
f x ≤ nndist 0 f := by
convert nndist_coe_le_nndist x
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/BoundedContinuousFunction.lean | 24 | 27 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
/-!
# The derivative of a composition (chain rule)
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
composition of functions (the chain rule).
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f g : E → F} {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {L : Filter E}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of two functions
For composition lemmas, we put `x` explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition. -/
variable (x)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {L' : Filter F}
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L') :
HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
let eq₁ := (g'.isBigO_comp _ _).trans_isLittleO hf.isLittleO
let eq₂ := (hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hL).trans_isBigO hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| eq₂.triangle <| eq₁.congr_left fun x' => ?_
simp
/- A readable version of the previous theorem, a general form of the chain rule. -/
example {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
have :=
calc
(fun x' => g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) =o[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto le_rfl
_ =O[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.triangle ?_
calc
(fun x' : E => g' (f x' - f x) - g'.comp f' (x' - x))
_ =ᶠ[L] fun x' => g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) := Eventually.of_forall fun x' => by simp
_ =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x) := g'.isBigO_comp _ _
_ =o[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isLittleO
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
hg.comp x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp_of_tendsto {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hst : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x)) : HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hst
/-- The chain rule. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x))
(hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hf.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h : MapsTo f s t) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.differentiableWithinAt.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem fderivWithin_comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderivWithin.comp := fderivWithin_comp
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A version of `fderivWithin_comp` that is useful to rewrite the composition of two derivatives
into a single derivative. This version always applies, but creates a new side-goal `f x = y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_fderivWithin {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} {s : Set E} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) (v : E) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 g t y (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x v) = fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x v := by
subst y
rw [fderivWithin_comp x hg hf h hxs, coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
/-- Ternary version of `fderivWithin_comp`, with equality assumptions of basepoints added, in
order to apply more easily as a rewrite from right-to-left. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp₃ {g' : G → G'} {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {u : Set G} {y : F} {y' : G}
(hg' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g' u y') (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h2g : MapsTo g t u) (h2f : MapsTo f s t) (h3g : g y = y')
(h3f : f x = y) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g' ∘ g ∘ f) s x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 g' u y').comp ((fderivWithin 𝕜 g t y).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)) := by
substs h3g h3f
exact (hg'.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x (hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h2f) <|
h2g.comp h2f).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderivWithin.comp₃ := fderivWithin_comp₃
theorem fderiv_comp {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderiv.comp := fderiv_comp
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderiv_comp' {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
fderiv_comp x hg hf
theorem fderiv_comp_fderivWithin {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderiv.comp_fderivWithin := fderiv_comp_fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g t)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (st : MapsTo f s t) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => DifferentiableWithinAt.comp x (hg (f x) (st hx)) (hf x hx) st
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.comp {g : F → G} (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
fun x => DifferentiableAt.comp x (hg (f x)) (hf x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.comp_differentiableOn {g : F → G} (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.differentiableOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
/-- The chain rule for derivatives in the sense of strict differentiability. -/
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' (f x)) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => g (f x)) (g'.comp f') x :=
.of_isLittleO <|
((hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto (hf.continuousAt.prodMap' hf.continuousAt)).trans_isBigO
hf.isBigO_sub).triangle <| by
simpa only [g'.map_sub, f'.coe_comp'] using (g'.isBigO_comp _ _).trans_isLittleO hf.isLittleO
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Differentiable.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (n : ℕ) :
Differentiable 𝕜 f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n differentiable_id fun _ ihn => ihn.comp hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem DifferentiableOn.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
| (hs : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f^[n] s :=
Nat.recOn n differentiableOn_id fun _ ihn => ihn.comp hf hs
variable {x}
protected theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f^[n] (f' ^ n) x L := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Comp.lean | 213 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Approximations
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.CorrectnessTerminating
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
/-!
# Termination of Continued Fraction Computations (`GenContFract.of`)
## Summary
We show that the continued fraction for a value `v`, as defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic`, terminates if and only if `v` corresponds to a
rational number, that is `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Main Theorems
- `GenContFract.coe_of_rat_eq` shows that
`GenContFract.of v = GenContFract.of q` for `v : α` given that `↑v = q` and `q : ℚ`.
- `GenContFract.terminates_iff_rat` shows that
`GenContFract.of v` terminates if and only if `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Tags
rational, continued fraction, termination
-/
namespace GenContFract
open GenContFract (of)
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [FloorRing K]
/-
We will have to constantly coerce along our structures in the following proofs using their provided
map functions.
-/
attribute [local simp] Pair.map IntFractPair.mapFr
section RatOfTerminates
/-!
### Terminating Continued Fractions Are Rational
We want to show that the computation of a continued fraction `GenContFract.of v`
terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`. In this section, we show the implication from left to right.
We first show that every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number `q` and then use the
finite correctness proof (`of_correctness_of_terminates`) of `GenContFract.of` to show that
`v = ↑q`.
-/
variable (v : K) (n : ℕ)
nonrec theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).contsAux n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) :=
Nat.strong_induction_on n
(by
clear n
let g := of v
intro n IH
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
-- n = 0
· suffices ∃ gp : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk (1 : K) 0 = gp.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk 1 0
simp
-- n = 1
· suffices ∃ conts : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk g.h 1 = conts.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk ⌊v⌋ 1
simp [g]
-- 2 ≤ n
· obtain ⟨pred_conts, pred_conts_eq⟩ := IH (n + 1) <| lt_add_one (n + 1)
-- invoke the IH
rcases s_ppred_nth_eq : g.s.get? n with gp_n | gp_n
-- option.none
· use pred_conts
have : g.contsAux (n + 2) = g.contsAux (n + 1) :=
contsAux_stable_of_terminated (n + 1).le_succ s_ppred_nth_eq
simp only [g, this, pred_conts_eq]
-- option.some
· -- invoke the IH a second time
obtain ⟨ppred_conts, ppred_conts_eq⟩ :=
IH n <| lt_of_le_of_lt n.le_succ <| lt_add_one <| n + 1
obtain ⟨a_eq_one, z, b_eq_z⟩ : gp_n.a = 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, gp_n.b = (z : K) :=
of_partNum_eq_one_and_exists_int_partDen_eq s_ppred_nth_eq
-- finally, unfold the recurrence to obtain the required rational value.
simp only [g, a_eq_one, b_eq_z,
contsAux_recurrence s_ppred_nth_eq ppred_conts_eq pred_conts_eq]
use nextConts 1 (z : ℚ) ppred_conts pred_conts
cases ppred_conts; cases pred_conts
simp [nextConts, nextNum, nextDen])
theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).conts n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) := by
rw [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_contAux]; exact exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux v <| n + 1
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_num : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).nums n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨a, _⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use a
simp [num_eq_conts_a, nth_cont_eq]
| theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_den : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).dens n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨_, b⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use b
simp [den_eq_conts_b, nth_cont_eq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/TerminatesIffRat.lean | 106 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
infer_instance
/-- Prefer `imageToKernel`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) (h) :
Subobject.ofLE (imageSubobject f) (kernelSubobject g) h = imageToKernel f g w :=
rfl
attribute [local instance] HasForget.instFunLike
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
-- a more suitable lemma is added below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageToKernel_arrow (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [imageToKernel]
@[simp]
lemma imageToKernel_arrow_apply {FV : V → V → Type*} {CV : V → Type*}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FV X Y) (CV X) (CV Y)] [ConcreteCategory V FV] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(x : ToType (Subobject.underlying.obj (imageSubobject f))) :
(kernelSubobject g).arrow (imageToKernel f g w x) =
(imageSubobject f).arrow x := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, imageToKernel_arrow]
-- This is less useful as a `simp` lemma than it initially appears,
-- as it "loses" the information the morphism factors through the image.
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ imageToKernel f g w = factorThruKernelSubobject g f w := by
ext
simp
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C)
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_zero_left [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] {w} :
imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g w = 0 := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_zero_right [HasImages V] {w} :
imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) w =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ inv (kernelSubobject (0 : B ⟶ C)).arrow := by
ext
simp
section
variable [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_right {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]) =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le g h) := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_comp_left {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g (by simp [w]) =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_mono {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) [Mono h] (w) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) w =
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simpa using w : (f ≫ g) ≫ h = 0 ≫ h)) ≫
(Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_mono g h)).inv := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_epi_comp {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) [Epi h] (w) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g w =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using w : h ≫ f ≫ g = h ≫ 0)) := by
ext
simp
end
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp [HasEqualizers V] [HasImages V] {Z : V} {i : B ≅ Z} (w) :
imageToKernel (f ≫ i.hom) (i.inv ≫ g) w =
(imageSubobjectCompIso _ _).hom ≫
imageToKernel f g (by simpa using w) ≫ (kernelSubobjectIsoComp i.inv g).inv := by
ext
simp
open ZeroObject
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --0--> B --g--> C`, where `g` is a mono is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] [Mono g] :
Epi (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g (by simp)) :=
epi_of_target_iso_zero _ (kernelSubobjectIso g ≪≫ kernel.ofMono g)
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --f--> B --0--> C`, where `g` is an epi is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero [HasImages V] [Epi f] :
Epi (imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) (by simp)) := by
simp only [imageToKernel_zero_right]
haveI := epi_image_of_epi f
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
infer_instance
end
section imageToKernel'
/-!
We provide a variant `imageToKernel' : image f ⟶ kernel g`,
and use this to give alternative formulas for `homology f g w`.
-/
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C) (w : f ≫ g = 0) [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
/-- While `imageToKernel f g w` provides a morphism
`imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g`
in terms of the subobject API,
this variant provides a morphism
`image f ⟶ kernel g`,
which is sometimes more convenient.
-/
def imageToKernel' (w : f ≫ g = 0) : image f ⟶ kernel g :=
kernel.lift g (image.ι f) <| by
ext
simpa using w
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobjectIso_imageToKernel' (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
(imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ imageToKernel' f g w =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso g).hom := by
ext
simp [imageToKernel']
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel'_kernelSubobjectIso (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel' f g w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso g).inv =
(imageSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp [imageToKernel']
end imageToKernel'
end
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 305 | 310 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier transform of the Gaussian
We prove that the Fourier transform of the Gaussian function is another Gaussian:
* `integral_cexp_quadratic`: general formula for `∫ (x : ℝ), exp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)`
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian`: for all complex `b` and `t` with `0 < re b`, we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (I * t * x) * exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2) * exp (-t ^ 2 / (4 * b))`.
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi`: a variant with `b` and `t` scaled to give a more symmetric
statement, and formulated in terms of the Fourier transform operator `𝓕`.
We also give versions of these formulas in finite-dimensional inner product spaces, see
`integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add` and `fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace`.
-/
/-!
## Fourier integral of Gaussian functions
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp abs_of_nonneg sq_abs
noncomputable section
namespace GaussianFourier
variable {b : ℂ}
/-- The integral of the Gaussian function over the vertical edges of a rectangle
with vertices at `(±T, 0)` and `(±T, c)`. -/
def verticalIntegral (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, I * (cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2) - cexp (-b * (T - y * I) ^ 2))
/-- Explicit formula for the norm of the Gaussian function along the vertical
edges. -/
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ = exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
rw [Complex.norm_exp, neg_mul, neg_re, ← re_add_im b]
simp only [sq, re_add_im, mul_re, mul_im, add_re, add_im, ofReal_re, ofReal_im, I_re, I_im]
ring_nf
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' (hb : b.re ≠ 0) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ =
exp (-(b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re))) := by
have :
b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2 =
b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re) := by
field_simp; ring
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I, this]
theorem verticalIntegral_norm_le (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 ≤ T) :
‖verticalIntegral b c T‖ ≤
(2 : ℝ) * |c| * exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - (2 : ℝ) * |b.im| * |c| * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
-- first get uniform bound for integrand
have vert_norm_bound :
∀ {T : ℝ},
0 ≤ T →
∀ {c y : ℝ},
|y| ≤ |c| →
‖cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2)‖ ≤
exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - (2 : ℝ) * |b.im| * |c| * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
intro T hT c y hy
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I b]
gcongr exp (- (_ - ?_ * _ - _ * ?_))
· (conv_lhs => rw [mul_assoc]); (conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc])
gcongr _ * ?_
refine (le_abs_self _).trans ?_
rw [abs_mul]
gcongr
· rwa [sq_le_sq]
-- now main proof
apply (intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const _).trans
· rw [sub_zero]
conv_lhs => simp only [mul_comm _ |c|]
conv_rhs =>
conv =>
congr
rw [mul_comm]
rw [mul_assoc]
· intro y hy
have absy : |y| ≤ |c| := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with (h | h)
· rw [uIoc_of_le h] at hy
rw [abs_of_nonneg h, abs_of_pos hy.1]
exact hy.2
· rw [uIoc_of_ge h.le] at hy
rw [abs_of_neg h, abs_of_nonpos hy.2, neg_le_neg_iff]
exact hy.1.le
rw [norm_mul, norm_I, one_mul, two_mul]
refine (norm_sub_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (vert_norm_bound hT absy) ?_)
rw [← abs_neg y] at absy
simpa only [neg_mul, ofReal_neg] using vert_norm_bound hT absy
theorem tendsto_verticalIntegral (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
Tendsto (verticalIntegral b c) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
-- complete proof using squeeze theorem:
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
refine
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds ?_
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => norm_nonneg _)
((eventually_ge_atTop (0 : ℝ)).mp
(Eventually.of_forall fun T hT => verticalIntegral_norm_le hb c hT))
rw [(by ring : 0 = 2 * |c| * 0)]
refine (tendsto_exp_atBot.comp (tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot.comp ?_)).const_mul _
apply tendsto_atTop_add_const_right
simp_rw [sq, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul]
refine Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop₀ (tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ ?_) tendsto_id
exact (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos hb).mpr tendsto_id
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) := by
refine
⟨(Complex.continuous_exp.comp
(continuous_const.mul
((continuous_ofReal.add continuous_const).pow 2))).aestronglyMeasurable,
?_⟩
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' hb.ne', neg_sub _ (c ^ 2 * _),
sub_eq_add_neg _ (b.re * _), Real.exp_add]
suffices Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-(b.re * x ^ 2)) by
exact (Integrable.comp_sub_right this (b.im * c / b.re)).hasFiniteIntegral.const_mul _
simp_rw [← neg_mul]
apply integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hb
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) := by
refine
tendsto_nhds_unique
(intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I hb c)
tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot tendsto_id)
?_
set I₁ := fun T => ∫ x : ℝ in -T..T, cexp (-b * (x + c * I) ^ 2) with HI₁
let I₂ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ x : ℝ in -T..T, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)
let I₄ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2)
let I₅ := fun T : ℝ => ∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (-T + y * I) ^ 2)
have C : ∀ T : ℝ, I₂ T - I₁ T + I * I₄ T - I * I₅ T = 0 := by
intro T
have :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn (fun z => cexp (-b * z ^ 2)) (-T)
(T + c * I)
(by
refine Differentiable.differentiableOn (Differentiable.const_mul ?_ _).cexp
exact differentiable_pow 2)
simpa only [neg_im, ofReal_im, neg_zero, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero, neg_re,
ofReal_re, add_re, mul_re, I_re, mul_zero, I_im, tsub_zero, add_im, mul_im,
mul_one, zero_add, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, ofReal_neg] using this
simp_rw [id, ← HI₁]
have : I₁ = fun T : ℝ => I₂ T + verticalIntegral b c T := by
ext1 T
specialize C T
rw [sub_eq_zero] at C
unfold verticalIntegral
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, intervalIntegral.integral_sub]
· simp_rw [(fun a b => by rw [sq]; ring_nf : ∀ a b : ℂ, (a - b * I) ^ 2 = (-a + b * I) ^ 2)]
change I₁ T = I₂ T + I * (I₄ T - I₅ T)
rw [mul_sub, ← C]
abel
all_goals apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable; continuity
rw [this, ← add_zero ((π / b : ℂ) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ)), ← integral_gaussian_complex hb]
refine Tendsto.add ?_ (tendsto_verticalIntegral hb c)
exact
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb) tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot
tendsto_id
theorem _root_.integral_cexp_quadratic (hb : b.re < 0) (c d : ℂ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d) = (π / -b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (d - c^2 / (4 * b)) := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have h (x : ℝ) : cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d) =
cexp (- -b * (x + c / (2 * b)) ^ 2) * cexp (d - c ^ 2 / (4 * b)) := by
simp_rw [← Complex.exp_add]
congr 1
field_simp
ring_nf
simp_rw [h, MeasureTheory.integral_mul_const]
rw [← re_add_im (c / (2 * b))]
simp_rw [← add_assoc, ← ofReal_add]
rw [integral_add_right_eq_self fun a : ℝ ↦ cexp (- -b * (↑a + ↑(c / (2 * b)).im * I) ^ 2),
integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_real_mul_I ((neg_re b).symm ▸ (neg_pos.mpr hb))]
lemma _root_.integrable_cexp_quadratic' (hb : b.re < 0) (c d : ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)) := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
by_contra H
simpa [hb', pi_ne_zero, Complex.exp_ne_zero, integral_undef H]
using integral_cexp_quadratic hb c d
lemma _root_.integrable_cexp_quadratic (hb : 0 < b.re) (c d : ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)) := by
have : (-b).re < 0 := by simpa using hb
exact integrable_cexp_quadratic' this c d
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian (hb : 0 < b.re) (t : ℂ) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (I * t * x) * cexp (-b * x ^ 2) =
(π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-t ^ 2 / (4 * b)) := by
conv => enter [1, 2, x]; rw [← Complex.exp_add, add_comm, ← add_zero (-b * x ^ 2 + I * t * x)]
rw [integral_cexp_quadratic (show (-b).re < 0 by rwa [neg_re, neg_lt_zero]), neg_neg, zero_sub,
mul_neg, div_neg, neg_neg, mul_pow, I_sq, neg_one_mul, mul_comm]
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi' (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) :
(𝓕 fun x : ℝ => cexp (-π * b * x ^ 2 + 2 * π * c * x)) = fun t : ℝ =>
1 / b ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π / b * (t + I * c) ^ 2) := by
haveI : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have h : (-↑π * b).re < 0 := by
simpa only [neg_mul, neg_re, re_ofReal_mul, neg_lt_zero] using mul_pos pi_pos hb
ext1 t
simp_rw [fourierIntegral_real_eq_integral_exp_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← Complex.exp_add, ← add_assoc]
have (x : ℝ) : ↑(-2 * π * x * t) * I + -π * b * x ^ 2 + 2 * π * c * x =
-π * b * x ^ 2 + (-2 * π * I * t + 2 * π * c) * x + 0 := by push_cast; ring
simp_rw [this, integral_cexp_quadratic h, neg_mul, neg_neg]
congr 2
· rw [← div_div, div_self <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero, one_div, inv_cpow, ← one_div]
rw [Ne, arg_eq_pi_iff, not_and_or, not_lt]
exact Or.inl hb.le
· field_simp [ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero]
ring_nf
simp only [I_sq]
ring
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi (hb : 0 < b.re) :
(𝓕 fun (x : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-π * b * x ^ 2)) =
fun t : ℝ ↦ 1 / b ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π / b * t ^ 2) := by
simpa only [mul_zero, zero_mul, add_zero] using fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi' hb 0
section InnerProductSpace
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → ℂ}
(hb : ∀ i, 0 < (b i).re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (v : ι → ℝ) ↦ cexp (- ∑ i, b i * (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)) := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, Complex.exp_sum, ← neg_mul]
apply Integrable.fintype_prod (f := fun i (v : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b i * v^2 + c i * v)) (fun i ↦ ?_)
convert integrable_cexp_quadratic (hb i) (c i) 0 using 3 with x
simp only [add_zero]
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
Integrable (fun (v : ι → ℝ) ↦ cexp (- b * ∑ i, (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)) := by
simp_rw [neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum]
exact integrable_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add (fun _ ↦ hb) c
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) :
Integrable (fun (v : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) ↦ cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫)) := by
have := EuclideanSpace.volume_preserving_measurableEquiv ι
rw [← MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb this.symm (MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)]
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_def]
convert integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add hb (fun i ↦ c * w i) using 3 with v
simp only [EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk, MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk,
EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, PiLp.inner_apply,
RCLike.inner_apply, conj_trivial, ofReal_sum, ofReal_mul, Finset.mul_sum, neg_mul,
Finset.sum_neg_distrib, mul_assoc, add_left_inj, neg_inj]
norm_cast
rw [sq_sqrt]
· simp [Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm]
· exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
/-- In a real inner product space, the complex exponential of minus the square of the norm plus
a scalar product is integrable. Useful when discussing the Fourier transform of a Gaussian. -/
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : V) :
Integrable (fun (v : V) ↦ cexp (-b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫)) := by
let e := (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ V).repr.symm
rw [← e.measurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb e.toHomeomorph.measurableEmbedding]
convert integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
hb c (e.symm w) with v
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map,
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_symm, conj_trivial, ofReal_sum,
ofReal_mul, LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → ℂ}
(hb : ∀ i, 0 < (b i).re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
∫ v : ι → ℝ, cexp (- ∑ i, b i * (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)
= ∏ i, (π / b i) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c i ^ 2 / (4 * b i)) := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, Complex.exp_sum, ← neg_mul]
rw [integral_fintype_prod_eq_prod (f := fun i (v : ℝ) ↦ cexp (-b i * v ^ 2 + c i * v))]
congr with i
have : (-b i).re < 0 := by simpa using hb i
convert integral_cexp_quadratic this (c i) 0 using 1 <;> simp [div_neg]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ι → ℂ) :
∫ v : ι → ℝ, cexp (- b * ∑ i, (v i : ℂ) ^ 2 + ∑ i, c i * v i)
= (π / b) ^ (Fintype.card ι / 2 : ℂ) * cexp ((∑ i, c i ^ 2) / (4 * b)) := by
simp_rw [neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum, integral_cexp_neg_sum_mul_add (fun _ ↦ hb) c, one_div,
Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const, ← cpow_nat_mul, ← Complex.exp_sum, Fintype.card,
Finset.sum_div, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι) :
∫ v : EuclideanSpace ℝ ι, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫) =
(π / b) ^ (Fintype.card ι / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c ^ 2 * ‖w‖^2 / (4 * b)) := by
have := (EuclideanSpace.volume_preserving_measurableEquiv ι).symm
rw [← this.integral_comp (MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)]
simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_def]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sum_add hb (fun i ↦ c * w i) using 5 with _x y
· simp only [EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk, MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk,
EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, neg_mul,
neg_inj, mul_eq_mul_left_iff]
norm_cast
left
rw [sq_sqrt]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
· simp [PiLp.inner_apply, EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
· simp only [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq, Real.norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, mul_pow, ← Finset.mul_sum]
congr
norm_cast
rw [sq_sqrt]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun i _hi ↦ by positivity)
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add
(hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℂ) (w : V) :
∫ v : V, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + c * ⟪w, v⟫) =
(π / b) ^ (Module.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (c ^ 2 * ‖w‖^2 / (4 * b)) := by
let e := (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ V).repr.symm
rw [← e.measurePreserving.integral_comp e.toHomeomorph.measurableEmbedding]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add_of_euclideanSpace
hb c (e.symm w) <;> simp [LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip]
theorem integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm (hb : 0 < b.re) :
∫ v : V, cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2) = (π / b) ^ (Module.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) := by
simpa using integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add hb 0 (0 : V)
theorem integral_rexp_neg_mul_sq_norm {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ v : V, rexp (- b * ‖v‖^2) = (π / b) ^ (Module.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← ofReal_inj]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm (show 0 < (b : ℂ).re from hb) (V := V)
· change ofRealLI (∫ (v : V), rexp (-b * ‖v‖ ^ 2)) = ∫ (v : V), cexp (-↑b * ↑‖v‖ ^ 2)
rw [← ofRealLI.integral_comp_comm]
simp [ofRealLI]
· rw [← ofReal_div, ofReal_cpow (by positivity)]
simp
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace' (hb : 0 < b.re) (x w : V) :
𝓕 (fun v ↦ cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2 + 2 * π * Complex.I * ⟪x, v⟫)) w =
(π / b) ^ (Module.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π ^ 2 * ‖x - w‖ ^ 2 / b) := by
simp only [neg_mul, fourierIntegral_eq', ofReal_neg, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat,
smul_eq_mul, ← Complex.exp_add, real_inner_comm w]
convert integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add hb (2 * π * Complex.I) (x - w) using 3 with v
· congr 1
simp [inner_sub_left]
ring
· have : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
field_simp [mul_pow]
ring
|
theorem _root_.fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace (hb : 0 < b.re) (w : V) :
𝓕 (fun v ↦ cexp (- b * ‖v‖^2)) w =
(π / b) ^ (Module.finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π ^ 2 * ‖w‖^2 / b) := by
simpa using fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace' hb 0 w
end InnerProductSpace
end GaussianFourier
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/FourierTransform.lean | 359 | 367 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Neighborhoods to the left and to the right on an `OrderTopology`
We've seen some properties of left and right neighborhood of a point in an `OrderClosedTopology`.
In an `OrderTopology`, such neighborhoods can be characterized as the sets containing suitable
intervals to the right or to the left of `a`. We give now these characterizations. -/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
section OrderTopology
variable [OrderTopology α]
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`;
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`;
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`;
3. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`;
4. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a`.
-/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsGT {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[>] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] a,
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ioo a u ⊆ s,
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun ⟨u, umem, hu⟩ => ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩
tfae_have 5 → 1
| ⟨u, hau, hu⟩ => mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hau) hu
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, au, fun x hx => hv ⟨hu ⟨le_of_lt hx.1, hx.2⟩, hx.1⟩⟩
tfae_finish
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := TFAE_mem_nhdsGT
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioc a u', Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 3
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 4
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset'
theorem nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt {a : α} (h : ∃ b, a < b) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis' := nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt
lemma nhdsGT_basis [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt <| exists_gt a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis := nhdsGT_basis
theorem nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff {a : α} : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ ↔ IsTop a ∨ ∃ b, a ⋖ b := by
by_cases ha : IsTop a
· simp [ha, ha.isMax.Ioi_eq]
· simp only [ha, false_or]
rw [isTop_iff_isMax, not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp only [(nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt ha).eq_bot_iff, covBy_iff_Ioo_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_eq_bot_iff := nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_u', hu'⟩ := exists_gt a
mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hu'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the right is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_right [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[>] x = ⊥ }.Countable := by
simp only [nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff, setOf_or]
exact (subsingleton_isTop α).countable.union countable_setOf_covBy_right
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the left is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_left [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[<] x = ⊥ }.Countable :=
countable_setOf_isolated_right (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioc a u ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
rcases exists_between au with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, hv.1, fun x hx => as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
exact ⟨u, au, Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self as⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b` -/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsLT {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[<] b,-- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] b,-- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] b,-- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioo l b ⊆ s,-- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioo l b ⊆ s] := by-- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b`
simpa using TFAE_mem_nhdsGT h.dual (ofDual ⁻¹' s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := TFAE_mem_nhdsLT
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLT hl' s).out 0 3
|
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightNhds.lean | 163 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod_mem (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_mem f hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod_mem f hs).symm
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` divided by the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` minus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f g : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) / ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mem_mul_distrib hs, finprod_mem_inv_distrib g hs]
/-!
### `∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x` and set operations
-/
/-- The product of any function over an empty set is `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of any function over an empty set is `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_empty : (∏ᶠ i ∈ (∅ : Set α), f i) = 1 := by simp
/-- A set `s` is nonempty if the product of some function over `s` is not equal to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `s` is nonempty if the sum of some function over `s` is not equal to `0`."]
theorem nonempty_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ finprod_mem_empty
/-- Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` times the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` plus the sum of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← Finset.coe_union, ← Finset.coe_inter]
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_union_inter]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter' (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union_inter hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, ←
finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f (s ∩ t)]
congr 2
rw [inter_left_comm, inter_assoc, inter_assoc, inter_self, inter_left_comm]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union' (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite)
(ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union_inter' hs ht, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 hst, finprod_mem_empty,
mul_one]
/-- Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals
the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_union' hst (hs.inter_of_left _) (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint"]
theorem finprod_mem_union'' (hst : Disjoint (s ∩ mulSupport f) (t ∩ mulSupport f))
(hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union hst hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`."]
theorem finprod_mem_singleton : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a} : Set α), f i) = f a := by
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton, finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_left : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i = a), f i) = f a :=
finprod_mem_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_right : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : a = i), f i) = f a := by simp [@eq_comm _ a]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s`
to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ support f` rather
than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert' (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [insert_eq, finprod_mem_union' _ _ hs, finprod_mem_singleton]
· rwa [disjoint_singleton_left]
· exact (finite_singleton a).inter_of_left _
/-- Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals
`f a` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s`
equals `f a` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert' f h <| hs.inter_of_left _
/-- If `f a = 1` when `a ∉ s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0` when `a ∉ s`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum
of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
refine finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' _ _ _ fun x hx => ⟨?_, Or.inr⟩
rintro (rfl | hxs)
exacts [not_imp_comm.1 h hx, hxs]
/-- If `f a = 1`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of `f i` over
`i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_one (h : f a = 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
/-- If the multiplicative support of `f` is finite, then for every `x` in the domain of `f`, `f x`
divides `finprod f`. -/
theorem finprod_mem_dvd {f : α → N} (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : f a ∣ finprod f := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf (Set.Subset.refl _)]
exact Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem f ((Finite.mem_toFinset hf).mpr ha)
· rw [nmem_mulSupport.mp ha]
exact one_dvd (finprod f)
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a + f b`."]
theorem finprod_mem_pair (h : a ≠ b) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), f i) = f a * f b := by
rw [finprod_mem_insert, finprod_mem_singleton]
exacts [h, finite_singleton b]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s`
provided that `g` is injective on `s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s ∩ support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image' {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) := by
classical
by_cases hs : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite
· have hg : ∀ x ∈ hs.toFinset, ∀ y ∈ hs.toFinset, g x = g y → x = y := by
simpa only [hs.mem_toFinset]
have := finprod_mem_eq_prod (comp f g) hs
unfold Function.comp at this
rw [this, ← Finset.prod_image hg]
refine finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq f ?_
rw [Finset.coe_image, hs.coe_toFinset, ← image_inter_mulSupport_eq, inter_assoc, inter_self]
· unfold Function.comp at hs
rw [finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite hs, finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite]
rwa [image_inter_mulSupport_eq, infinite_image_iff hg]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : s.InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_image' <| hg.mono inter_subset_left
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_range' {g : β → α} (hg : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) := by
rw [← image_univ, finprod_mem_image', finprod_mem_univ]
rwa [univ_inter]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective."]
theorem finprod_mem_range {g : β → α} (hg : Injective g) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_range' hg.injOn
/-- See also `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β)
(he₀ : s.BijOn e t) (he₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, g j := by
rw [← Set.BijOn.image_eq he₀, finprod_mem_image he₀.2.1]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl he₁
/-- See `finprod_comp`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See `finsum_comp`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_eq_of_bijective {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Bijective e)
(he₁ : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ᶠ j, g j := by
rw [← finprod_mem_univ f, ← finprod_mem_univ g]
exact finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn _ (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.mp he₀) fun x _ => he₁ x
/-- See also `finprod_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `finsum_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_comp {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Function.Bijective e) :
(∏ᶠ i, g (e i)) = ∏ᶠ j, g j :=
finprod_eq_of_bijective e he₀ fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_comp_equiv (e : α ≃ β) {f : β → M} : (∏ᶠ i, f (e i)) = ∏ᶠ i', f i' :=
finprod_comp e e.bijective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem (s : Set α) : ∏ᶠ j : s, f j = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_range, Subtype.range_coe]
exact Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_subtype_eq_finprod_cond (p : α → Prop) :
∏ᶠ j : Subtype p, f j = ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem { i | p i }
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' (t : Set α) (h : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union', inter_union_diff]
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
exact fun x hx => hx.2.2 hx.1.2
exacts [h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩, h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff (t : Set α) (h : s.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ <| h.inter_of_left _
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_diff` that requires `t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than
`t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_diff` that requires `t ∩ support f` rather
than `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff' (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ ht, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
/-- Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
times the product of `f i` over `t \ s` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus
the sum of `f i` over `t \\ s` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_mul_diff' hst (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the product of
`f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the product over all indexes `i` of the products of
`f a` over `a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the
sum of `f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the sum over all indexes `i` of the
sums of `f a` over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_iUnion [Finite ι] {t : ι → Set α} (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t))
(ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ i : ι, t i, f a = ∏ᶠ i, ∏ᶠ a ∈ t i, f a := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
lift t to ι → Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← biUnion_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_biUnion, finprod_mem_coe_finset,
Finset.prod_biUnion]
· simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype]
· exact fun x _ y _ hxy => Finset.disjoint_coe.1 (h hxy)
/-- Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that all sets
`t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the product over `i ∈ I` of the products of `f a` over
`a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that
all sets `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the
sum of `f a` over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the sum over `i ∈ I` of the sums of `f a`
over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_biUnion {I : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : I.PairwiseDisjoint t) (hI : I.Finite)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ I, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ x ∈ I, t x, f a = ∏ᶠ i ∈ I, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t i, f j := by
haveI := hI.fintype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, finprod_mem_iUnion, ← finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem]
exacts [fun x y hxy => h x.2 y.2 (Subtype.coe_injective.ne hxy), fun b => ht b b.2]
/-- If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the product over `s ∈ t` of the products of `f a` over `a ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the sum of `f a` over
`a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the sum over `s ∈ t` of the sums of `f a` over `a ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_sUnion {t : Set (Set α)} (h : t.PairwiseDisjoint id) (ht₀ : t.Finite)
(ht₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, Set.Finite x) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃₀ t, f a = ∏ᶠ s ∈ t, ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact finprod_mem_biUnion h ht₀ ht₁
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_option {f : Option α → M} (hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ some)).Finite) :
∏ᶠ o, f o = f none * ∏ᶠ a, f (some a) := by
replace hf : (mulSupport f).Finite := by simpa [finite_option]
convert finprod_mem_insert' f (show none ∉ Set.range Option.some by aesop)
(hf.subset inter_subset_right)
· aesop
· rw [finprod_mem_range]
exact Option.some_injective _
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_finprod_cond_ne (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(f a * ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
have h : ∀ x : α, f x ≠ 1 → (x ≠ a ↔ x ∈ hf.toFinset \ {a}) := by
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro hx h, fun h => h.2⟩
rw [finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff f (fun hx => h _ hx), Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· apply Finset.mul_prod_erase _ _ ((Finite.mem_toFinset _).mpr ha)
· rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not] at ha
rw [ha, one_mul]
apply Finset.prod_erase _ ha
/-- If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then taking the product over `s` commutes with
taking the product over `t`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then summing over `s` commutes with
summing over `t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_comm {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β → M) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ s, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, f i j) = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i j := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset β using ht
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset]
exact Finset.prod_comm
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on summands."]
theorem finprod_mem_induction (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1) (hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(hp₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) : p (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) :=
finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ fun x => finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ <| hp₂ x
theorem finprod_cond_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{p : α → Prop} {f : α → R}
(hf : ∀ x, p x → 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ ∏ᶠ (x) (_ : p x), f x :=
finprod_nonneg fun x => finprod_nonneg <| hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem single_le_finprod {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
(i : α) {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (h : ∀ j, 1 ≤ f j) : f i ≤ ∏ᶠ j, f j := by
classical calc
f i ≤ ∏ j ∈ insert i hf.toFinset, f j :=
Finset.single_le_prod' (fun j _ => h j) (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
_ = ∏ᶠ j, f j :=
(finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ hf (Finset.subset_insert _ _)).symm
theorem finprod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] (f : α → M₀) (x : α) (hx : f x = 0)
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ x, f x = 0 := by
nontriviality
rw [finprod_eq_prod f hf]
refine Finset.prod_eq_zero (hf.mem_toFinset.2 ?_) hx
simp [hx]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_prod_comm (s : Finset β) (f : α → β → M)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, (mulSupport fun a => f a b).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ a : α, ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) = ∏ b ∈ s, ∏ᶠ a : α, f a b := by
have hU :
(mulSupport fun a => ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) ⊆
(s.finite_toSet.biUnion fun b hb => h b (Finset.mem_coe.1 hb)).toFinset := by
rw [Finite.coe_toFinset]
intro x hx
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Ne, mem_mulSupport, Finset.mem_coe]
contrapose! hx
rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not, Finset.prod_congr rfl hx, Finset.prod_const_one]
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hU, Finset.prod_comm]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun b hb => (finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_).symm
intro a ha
simp only [Finite.coe_toFinset, mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨b, hb, ha⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finprod_comm (s : Finset α) (f : α → β → M) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, (mulSupport (f a)).Finite) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ᶠ b : β, f a b) = ∏ᶠ b : β, ∏ a ∈ s, f a b :=
(finprod_prod_comm s (fun b a => f a b) h).symm
theorem mul_finsum {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a : α, f a) = ∑ᶠ a : α, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum h
theorem mul_finsum_mem {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum_mem f hs
theorem finsum_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (∑ᶠ a : α, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a : α, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum h
theorem finsum_mem_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum_mem f hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finprod_apply {α ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → N} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (a : α) :
| (∏ᶠ i, f i) a = ∏ᶠ i, f i a := by
classical
have hf' : (mulSupport fun i ↦ f i a).Finite := hf.subset (by aesop)
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 1,051 | 1,053 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
/-!
# Integral and algebraic elements of a fraction field
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S]
open Polynomial
namespace IsLocalization
section IntegerNormalization
open Polynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `coeffIntegerNormalization p` gives the coefficients of the polynomial
`integerNormalization p` -/
noncomputable def coeffIntegerNormalization (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) : R :=
if hi : i ∈ p.support then
Classical.choose
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
else 0
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) (h : coeff p i = 0) :
coeffIntegerNormalization M p i = 0 := by
simp only [coeffIntegerNormalization, h, mem_support_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
dif_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ)
(h : coeffIntegerNormalization M p i ≠ 0) : i ∈ p.support := by
contrapose h
rw [Ne, Classical.not_not, coeffIntegerNormalization, dif_neg h]
/-- `integerNormalization g` normalizes `g` to have integer coefficients
by clearing the denominators -/
noncomputable def integerNormalization (p : S[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (coeffIntegerNormalization M p i)
@[simp]
theorem integerNormalization_coeff (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) :
(integerNormalization M p).coeff i = coeffIntegerNormalization M p i := by
simp +contextual [integerNormalization, coeff_monomial,
coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support]
theorem integerNormalization_spec (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, ∀ i, algebraMap R S ((integerNormalization M p).coeff i) = (b : R) • p.coeff i := by
classical
use Classical.choose (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
intro i
rw [integerNormalization_coeff, coeffIntegerNormalization]
split_ifs with hi
· exact
Classical.choose_spec
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· rw [RingHom.map_zero, not_mem_support_iff.mp hi, smul_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert (smul_zero _).symm, ...`
theorem integerNormalization_map_to_map (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, (integerNormalization M p).map (algebraMap R S) = (b : R) • p :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_spec M p
⟨b,
Polynomial.ext fun i => by
rw [coeff_map, coeff_smul]
exact hb i⟩
variable {R' : Type*} [CommRing R']
theorem integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero (g : S →+* R') (p : S[X]) {x : R'}
(hx : eval₂ g x p = 0) : eval₂ (g.comp (algebraMap R S)) x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_map_to_map M p
_root_.trans (eval₂_map (algebraMap R S) g x).symm
(by rw [hb, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S (b : R) p, eval₂_smul, hx, mul_zero])
theorem integerNormalization_aeval_eq_zero [Algebra R R'] [Algebra S R'] [IsScalarTower R S R']
(p : S[X]) {x : R'} (hx : aeval x p = 0) : aeval x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R S R',
integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero _ (algebraMap _ _) _ hx]
end IntegerNormalization
end IsLocalization
namespace IsFractionRing
| open IsLocalization
variable {A K C : Type*} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [Field K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable [CommRing C]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integral.lean | 112 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
| · simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 762 | 765 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[f i] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min_const hτ]; apply MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_inf
theorem measurableSet_inter_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π)
(s : Set Ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet] at hs ⊢
intro i
have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} =
s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} ∩
{ω | min (τ ω) i ≤ min (min (τ ω) (π ω)) i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [min_le_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff, le_refl, true_and,
true_or]
by_cases hτi : τ ω ≤ i
· simp only [hτi, true_or, and_true, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor <;> intro h
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases h with h | h
· exact h
· exact hτi.trans h
simp only [hτi, false_or, and_false, false_and, iff_false, not_and, not_le, and_imp]
refine fun _ hτ_le_π => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hτ_le_π
rw [← not_le]
exact hτi
rw [this]
refine ((hs i).inter ((hτ.min hπ) i)).inter ?_
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f i) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact ((hτ.min hπ).min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_iff [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self]
rw [this]
exact measurableSet_inter_le _ hπ _ h
· rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at h
exact h.1
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_min_iff hτ (isStoppingTime_const _ i),
IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_const, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩, fun h j => h.1 j⟩
specialize h i
rwa [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self] at h
theorem measurableSet_le_stopping_time [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω | min (τ ω) j ≤ min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, min_le_iff, le_min_iff, le_refl,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
simp only [h, or_self_iff, and_true]
rw [Iff.comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact h.trans
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f j) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_stopping_time_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
suffices MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} by
rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at this; exact this.2
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}, ← hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_iff hπ, Set.univ_inter]
exact measurableSet_le_stopping_time hτ hπ
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time [AddGroup ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[MeasurableSub₂ ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hσ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hσ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time_of_countable [Countable ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hπ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hπ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end IsStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
/-! ## Stopped value and stopped process -/
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, its stopped value with respect to the stopping
time `τ` is the map `x ↦ u (τ ω) ω`. -/
def stoppedValue (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : Ω → β := fun ω => u (τ ω) ω
theorem stoppedValue_const (u : ι → Ω → β) (i : ι) : (stoppedValue u fun _ => i) = u i :=
rfl
variable [LinearOrder ι]
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, the stopped process with respect to `τ` is `u i ω` if
`i ≤ τ ω`, and `u (τ ω) ω` otherwise.
Intuitively, the stopped process stops evolving once the stopping time has occurred. -/
def stoppedProcess (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : ι → Ω → β := fun i ω => u (min i (τ ω)) ω
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_stoppedValue {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedProcess u τ = fun i => stoppedValue u fun ω => min i (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedProcess {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ σ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess u τ) σ = stoppedValue u fun ω => min (σ ω) (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_le {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : i ≤ τ ω) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u i ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_left h]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : τ ω ≤ i) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u (τ ω) ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_right h]
section ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
theorem progMeasurable_min_stopping_time [MetrizableSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => min i (τ ω) := by
intro i
let m_prod : MeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)
let m_set : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω), MeasurableSpace t := fun _ =>
@Subtype.instMeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) _ m_prod
let s := {p : Set.Iic i × Ω | τ p.2 ≤ i}
have hs : MeasurableSet[m_prod] s := @measurable_snd (Set.Iic i) Ω _ (f i) _ (hτ i)
have h_meas_fst : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω),
Measurable[m_set t] fun x : t => ((x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst : ι) :=
fun t => (@measurable_subtype_coe (Set.Iic i × Ω) m_prod _).fst.subtype_val
apply Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs ?_ ?_
· refine @Measurable.min _ _ _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ _ (h_meas_fst s) ?_
refine @measurable_of_Iic ι s _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ fun j => ?_
have h_set_eq : (fun x : s => τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' Set.Iic j =
(fun x : s => (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' {ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iic, iff_and_self, le_min_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun _ => ω.prop
rw [h_set_eq]
suffices h_meas : @Measurable _ _ (m_set s) (f i) fun x : s ↦ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd from
h_meas (f.mono (min_le_left _ _) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (min i j)))
exact measurable_snd.comp (@measurable_subtype_coe _ m_prod _)
· letI sc := sᶜ
suffices h_min_eq_left :
(fun x : sc => min (↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst) (τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd)) = fun x : sc =>
↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [sc, Set.restrict, h_min_eq_left]
exact h_meas_fst _
ext1 ω
rw [min_eq_left]
have hx_fst_le : ↑(ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst ≤ i := (ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst.prop
refine hx_fst_le.trans (le_of_lt ?_)
convert ω.prop
simp only [sc, s, not_le, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : ProgMeasurable f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
h.comp (progMeasurable_min_stopping_time hτ) fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _
theorem ProgMeasurable.adapted_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(h.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem ProgMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι]
(hu : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ i) :=
(hu.adapted_stoppedProcess hτ i).mono (f.le _)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le (h : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : StronglyMeasurable[f n] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have : stoppedValue u τ =
(fun p : Set.Iic n × Ω => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) ∘ fun ω => (⟨τ ω, hτ_le ω⟩, ω) := by
ext1 ω; simp only [stoppedValue, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [this]
refine StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable (h n) ?_
exact (hτ.measurable_of_le hτ_le).subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_id
theorem measurable_stoppedValue [MetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(hf_prog : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have h_str_meas : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf_prog (hτ.min_const i) fun _ => min_le_right _ _
intro t ht i
suffices stoppedValue u τ ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} =
(stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} by
rw [this]; exact ((h_str_meas i).measurable ht).inter (hτ.measurableSet_le i)
ext1 ω
simp only [stoppedValue, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [min_eq_left h]
end ProgMeasurable
end LinearOrder
section StoppedValueOfMemFinset
variable {μ : Measure Ω} {τ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {u : ι → Ω → E}
theorem stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ s, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext y
classical
rw [stoppedValue, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
suffices {i ∈ s | y ∈ {ω : Ω | τ ω = i}} = ({τ y} : Finset ι) by
rw [this, Finset.sum_singleton]
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_singleton]
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.2.symm
· refine ⟨?_, h.symm⟩; rw [h]; exact hbdd y
theorem stoppedValue_eq' [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {N : ι}
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Iic N, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset [LinearOrder ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (n : ι)
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ s with i < n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_apply]
rcases le_or_lt n (τ ω) with h | h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_le h, Set.indicator_of_mem, Finset.sum_eq_zero, add_zero]
· intro m hm
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hm
exact (hm.2.trans_le h).ne'
· exact h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge (le_of_lt h), Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (τ ω)]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, zero_add, Set.indicator_of_mem] <;> rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact not_le.2 h
· rw [Finset.mem_filter]
exact ⟨hbdd ω h, h⟩
· intro b _ hneq
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact hneq.symm
theorem stoppedProcess_eq'' [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] (n : ι) :
stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.Iio n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
have h_mem : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ Finset.Iio n := fun ω h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset n h_mem]
congr with i
simp
section StoppedValue
variable [PartialOrder ι] {ℱ : Filtration ι m} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ)
{s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) : MemLp (stoppedValue u τ) p μ := by
rw [stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset hbdd]
refine memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => MemLp.indicator ?_ (hu i)
refine ℱ.le i {a : Ω | τ a = i} (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range ?_ i)
refine ((Finset.finite_toSet s).subset fun ω hω => ?_).countable
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hω
exact hbdd y
theorem memLp_stoppedValue [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ) {N : ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) : MemLp (stoppedValue u τ) p μ :=
memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem integrable_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
Integrable (stoppedValue u τ) μ := by
simp_rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hu ⊢
exact memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu hbdd
variable (ι)
theorem integrable_stoppedValue [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) {N : ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
Integrable (stoppedValue u τ) μ :=
integrable_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
end StoppedValue
section StoppedProcess
variable [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
{ℱ : Filtration ι m} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ)
(n : ι) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : MemLp (stoppedProcess u τ n) p μ := by
rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset n hbdd]
refine MemLp.add ?_ ?_
· exact MemLp.indicator (ℱ.le n {a : Ω | n ≤ τ a} (hτ.measurableSet_ge n)) (hu n)
· suffices MemLp (fun ω => ∑ i ∈ s with i < n, {a : Ω | τ a = i}.indicator (u i) ω) p μ by
convert this using 1; ext1 ω; simp only [Finset.sum_apply]
refine memLp_finset_sum _ fun i _ => MemLp.indicator ?_ (hu i)
exact ℱ.le i {a : Ω | τ a = i} (hτ.measurableSet_eq i)
theorem memLp_stoppedProcess [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ) (n : ι) : MemLp (stoppedProcess u τ n) p μ :=
memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n fun _ h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
theorem integrable_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) (n : ι) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) :
Integrable (stoppedProcess u τ n) μ := by
simp_rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hu ⊢
exact memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n hbdd
theorem integrable_stoppedProcess [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) (n : ι) : Integrable (stoppedProcess u τ n) μ :=
integrable_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n fun _ h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
end StoppedProcess
end StoppedValueOfMemFinset
section AdaptedStoppedProcess
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
{f : Filtration ι m} {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι}
/-- The stopped process of an adapted process with continuous paths is adapted. -/
theorem Adapted.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hu_cont : ∀ ω, Continuous fun i => u i ω) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Adapted f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
((hu.progMeasurable_of_continuous hu_cont).stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
/-- If the indexing order has the discrete topology, then the stopped process of an adapted process
is adapted. -/
theorem Adapted.stoppedProcess_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(hu.progMeasurable_of_discrete.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem Adapted.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hu_cont : ∀ ω, Continuous fun i => u i ω) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (n : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ n) :=
(hu.progMeasurable_of_continuous hu_cont).stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess hτ n
theorem Adapted.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology ι]
(hu : Adapted f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (n : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ n) :=
hu.progMeasurable_of_discrete.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess hτ n
end AdaptedStoppedProcess
section Nat
/-! ### Filtrations indexed by `ℕ` -/
open Filtration
variable {u : ℕ → Ω → β} {τ π : Ω → ℕ}
theorem stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum [AddCommGroup β] (hle : τ ≤ π) :
stoppedValue u π - stoppedValue u τ = fun ω =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico (τ ω) (π ω), (u (i + 1) - u i)) ω := by
ext ω
rw [Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub _ (hle ω), Finset.sum_range_sub, Finset.sum_range_sub]
simp [stoppedValue]
theorem stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum' [AddCommGroup β] (hle : τ ≤ π) {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u π - stoppedValue u τ = fun ω =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range (N + 1), Set.indicator {ω | τ ω ≤ i ∧ i < π ω} (u (i + 1) - u i)) ω := by
rw [stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum hle]
ext ω
simp only [Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
ext i
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_Ico]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨lt_trans h.2 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| hbdd _), h⟩, fun h => h.2⟩
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β]
theorem stoppedValue_eq {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) : stoppedValue u τ = fun x =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range (N + 1), Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i)) x :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq (n : ℕ) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
rw [stoppedProcess_eq'' n]
congr with i
rw [Finset.mem_Iio, Finset.mem_range]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq' (n : ℕ) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n + 1 ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), Set.indicator {a | τ a = i} (u i) := by
have : {a | n ≤ τ a}.indicator (u n) =
{a | n + 1 ≤ τ a}.indicator (u n) + {a | τ a = n}.indicator (u n) := by
ext x
rw [add_comm, Pi.add_apply, ← Set.indicator_union_of_not_mem_inter]
· simp_rw [@eq_comm _ _ n, @le_iff_eq_or_lt _ _ n, Nat.succ_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at h₁ h₂
exact (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 h₂).ne h₁.symm
rw [stoppedProcess_eq, this, Finset.sum_range_succ_comm, ← add_assoc]
end AddCommMonoid
end Nat
section PiecewiseConst
variable [Preorder ι] {𝒢 : Filtration ι m} {τ η : Ω → ι} {i j : ι} {s : Set Ω}
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
/-- Given stopping times `τ` and `η` which are bounded below, `Set.piecewise s τ η` is also
a stopping time with respect to the same filtration. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.piecewise_of_le (hτ_st : IsStoppingTime 𝒢 τ) (hη_st : IsStoppingTime 𝒢 η)
(hτ : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) (hη : ∀ ω, i ≤ η ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s) :
IsStoppingTime 𝒢 (s.piecewise τ η) := by
intro n
have : {ω | s.piecewise τ η ω ≤ n} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ n} ∪ sᶜ ∩ {ω | η ω ≤ n} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.piecewise, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
rw [this]
by_cases hin : i ≤ n
· have hs_n : MeasurableSet[𝒢 n] s := 𝒢.mono hin _ hs
exact (hs_n.inter (hτ_st n)).union (hs_n.compl.inter (hη_st n))
· have hτn : ∀ ω, ¬τ ω ≤ n := fun ω hτn => hin ((hτ ω).trans hτn)
have hηn : ∀ ω, ¬η ω ≤ n := fun ω hηn => hin ((hη ω).trans hηn)
simp [hτn, hηn, @MeasurableSet.empty _ _]
theorem isStoppingTime_piecewise_const (hij : i ≤ j) (hs : MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s) :
IsStoppingTime 𝒢 (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) :=
(isStoppingTime_const 𝒢 i).piecewise_of_le (isStoppingTime_const 𝒢 j) (fun _ => le_rfl)
(fun _ => hij) hs
theorem stoppedValue_piecewise_const {ι' : Type*} {i j : ι'} {f : ι' → Ω → ℝ} :
stoppedValue f (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) = s.piecewise (f i) (f j) := by
ext ω; rw [stoppedValue]; by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
theorem stoppedValue_piecewise_const' {ι' : Type*} {i j : ι'} {f : ι' → Ω → ℝ} :
stoppedValue f (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) =
s.indicator (f i) + sᶜ.indicator (f j) := by
ext ω; rw [stoppedValue]; by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
end PiecewiseConst
section Condexp
/-! ### Conditional expectation with respect to the σ-algebra generated by a stopping time -/
variable [LinearOrder ι] {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ι m} {τ σ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f : Ω → E}
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range h_countable))] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] := by
refine condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range h_countable) (ℱ.le i)
(hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i) fun t => ?_
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_inter_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable [Countable ι]
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable)] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range hτ (Set.to_countable _) i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable
variable [(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated]
theorem condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (i : ι)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace_le)] :
μ[f|(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x ≤ i}] μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] := by
have : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) :=
haveI h_le : (hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace ≤ hτ.measurableSpace := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_min_const]
exact inf_le_left
sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ h_le
refine (condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on hτ.measurableSpace_le
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace_le (hτ.measurableSet_le' i) fun t => ?_).symm
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const :=
condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const
| variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq [FirstCountableTopology ι]
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le)] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] := by
refine condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on hτ.measurableSpace_le (ℱ.le i)
(hτ.measurableSet_eq' i) fun t => ?_
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_inter_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 1,092 | 1,102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
/-!
# Lemmas about units in `ℤ`, which interact with the order structure.
-/
namespace Int
theorem isUnit_iff_abs_eq {x : ℤ} : IsUnit x ↔ abs x = 1 := by
rw [isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, abs_eq_natAbs, ← Int.ofNat_one, natCast_inj]
theorem isUnit_sq {a : ℤ} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [sq, isUnit_mul_self ha]
@[simp]
theorem units_sq (u : ℤˣ) : u ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_one, isUnit_sq u.isUnit]
alias units_pow_two := units_sq
@[simp]
theorem units_mul_self (u : ℤˣ) : u * u = 1 := by rw [← sq, units_sq]
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_eq_self (u : ℤˣ) : u⁻¹ = u := by rw [inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one, units_mul_self]
theorem units_div_eq_mul (u₁ u₂ : ℤˣ) : u₁ / u₂ = u₁ * u₂ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, units_inv_eq_self]
-- `Units.val_mul` is a "wrong turn" for the simplifier, this undoes it and simplifies further
@[simp]
theorem units_coe_mul_self (u : ℤˣ) : (u * u : ℤ) = 1 := by
rw [← Units.val_mul, units_mul_self, Units.val_one]
theorem neg_one_pow_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (-1 : ℤ) ^ n ≠ 0 := by simp
theorem sq_eq_one_of_sq_lt_four {x : ℤ} (h1 : x ^ 2 < 4) (h2 : x ≠ 0) : x ^ 2 = 1 :=
sq_eq_one_iff.mpr
((abs_eq (zero_le_one' ℤ)).mp
(le_antisymm (lt_add_one_iff.mp (abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h1 zero_le_two))
(sub_one_lt_iff.mp (abs_pos.mpr h2))))
theorem sq_eq_one_of_sq_le_three {x : ℤ} (h1 : x ^ 2 ≤ 3) (h2 : x ≠ 0) : x ^ 2 = 1 :=
| sq_eq_one_of_sq_lt_four (lt_of_le_of_lt h1 (lt_add_one (3 : ℤ))) h2
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Order/Units.lean | 49 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Presheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Spaces
/-!
# Sheaves
We define sheaves on a topological space, with values in an arbitrary category.
A presheaf on a topological space `X` is a sheaf precisely when it is a sheaf under the
grothendieck topology on `opens X`, which expands out to say: For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of
`U`, and a family of compatible functions `A ⟶ F(Uᵢ)` for an `A : X`, there exists a unique
gluing `A ⟶ F(U)` compatible with the restriction.
See the docstring of `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheaf` for an explanation on the design decisions and a list
of equivalent conditions.
We provide the instance `CategoryTheory.Category (TopCat.Sheaf C X)` as the full subcategory of
presheaves, and the fully faithful functor `Sheaf.forget : TopCat.Sheaf C X ⥤ TopCat.Presheaf C X`.
-/
universe w v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopologicalSpace Opposite TopologicalSpace.Opens
namespace TopCat
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X : TopCat.{w}} (F : Presheaf C X) {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X)
namespace Presheaf
/-- The sheaf condition has several different equivalent formulations.
The official definition chosen here is in terms of grothendieck topologies so that the results on
sites could be applied here easily, and this condition does not require additional constraints on
the value category.
The equivalent formulations of the sheaf condition on `presheaf C X` are as follows :
1. `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheaf`: (the official definition)
It is a sheaf with respect to the grothendieck topology on `opens X`, which is to say:
For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `U`, and a family of compatible functions `A ⟶ F(Uᵢ)` for an
`A : X`, there exists a unique gluing `A ⟶ F(U)` compatible with the restriction.
2. `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheafEqualizerProducts`: (requires `C` to have all products)
For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `U`, `F(U) ⟶ ∏ᶜ F(Uᵢ)` is the equalizer of the two morphisms
`∏ᶜ F(Uᵢ) ⟶ ∏ᶜ F(Uᵢ ∩ Uⱼ)`.
See `TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheafEqualizerProducts`.
3. `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheafOpensLeCover`:
For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `U`, `F(U)` is the limit of the diagram consisting of arrows
`F(V₁) ⟶ F(V₂)` for every pair of open sets `V₁ ⊇ V₂` that are contained in some `Uᵢ`.
See `TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheafOpensLeCover`.
4. `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheafPairwiseIntersections`:
For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `U`, `F(U)` is the limit of the diagram consisting of arrows
from `F(Uᵢ)` and `F(Uⱼ)` to `F(Uᵢ ∩ Uⱼ)` for each pair `(i, j)`.
See `TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheafPairwiseIntersections`.
The following requires `C` to be concrete and complete, and `forget C` to reflect isomorphisms and
preserve limits. This applies to most "algebraic" categories, e.g. groups, abelian groups and rings.
5. `TopCat.Presheaf.IsSheafUniqueGluing`:
(requires `C` to be concrete and complete; `forget C` to reflect isomorphisms and preserve limits)
For each open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `U`, and a compatible family of elements `x : F(Uᵢ)`, there exists
a unique gluing `x : F(U)` that restricts to the given elements.
See `TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheafUniqueGluing`.
6. The underlying sheaf of types is a sheaf.
See `TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp` and
`CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_forget`.
-/
nonrec def IsSheaf (F : Presheaf.{w, v, u} C X) : Prop :=
Presheaf.IsSheaf (Opens.grothendieckTopology X) F
/-- The presheaf valued in `Unit` over any topological space is a sheaf.
-/
theorem isSheaf_unit (F : Presheaf (CategoryTheory.Discrete Unit) X) : F.IsSheaf :=
fun x U S _ x _ => ⟨eqToHom (Subsingleton.elim _ _), by aesop_cat, fun _ => by aesop_cat⟩
theorem isSheaf_iso_iff {F G : Presheaf C X} (α : F ≅ G) : F.IsSheaf ↔ G.IsSheaf :=
| Presheaf.isSheaf_of_iso_iff α
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Sheaf.lean | 90 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
/-!
# Construct a sorted list from a finset.
-/
namespace Finset
open Multiset Nat
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### sort -/
section sort
variable (r : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel r] [IsTrans α r] [IsAntisymm α r] [IsTotal α r]
/-- `sort s` constructs a sorted list from the unordered set `s`.
(Uses merge sort algorithm.) -/
def sort (s : Finset α) : List α :=
Multiset.sort r s.1
@[simp]
theorem sort_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.sort r s.val = sort r s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sort_mk {s : Multiset α} (h : s.Nodup) : sort r ⟨s, h⟩ = s.sort r := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sort_sorted (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted r (sort r s) :=
Multiset.sort_sorted _ _
@[simp]
theorem sort_eq (s : Finset α) : ↑(sort r s) = s.1 :=
Multiset.sort_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem sort_nodup (s : Finset α) : (sort r s).Nodup :=
(by rw [sort_eq]; exact s.2 : @Multiset.Nodup α (sort r s))
@[simp]
theorem sort_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (sort r s).toFinset = s :=
List.toFinset_eq (sort_nodup r s) ▸ eq_of_veq (sort_eq r s)
@[simp]
theorem mem_sort {s : Finset α} {a : α} : a ∈ sort r s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_sort _
@[simp]
theorem length_sort {s : Finset α} : (sort r s).length = s.card :=
Multiset.length_sort _
@[simp]
theorem sort_empty : sort r ∅ = [] :=
Multiset.sort_zero r
@[simp]
theorem sort_singleton (a : α) : sort r {a} = [a] :=
Multiset.sort_singleton r a
theorem sort_cons {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h₁ : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) (h₂ : a ∉ s) :
sort r (cons a s h₂) = a :: sort r s := by
rw [sort, cons_val, Multiset.sort_cons r a _ h₁, sort_val]
theorem sort_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h₁ : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) (h₂ : a ∉ s) :
sort r (insert a s) = a :: sort r s := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h₂, sort_cons r h₁]
@[simp]
theorem sort_range (n : ℕ) : sort (· ≤ ·) (range n) = List.range n :=
Multiset.sort_range n
open scoped List in
theorem sort_perm_toList (s : Finset α) : sort r s ~ s.toList := by
rw [← Multiset.coe_eq_coe]
simp only [coe_toList, sort_eq]
theorem _root_.List.toFinset_sort [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
sort r l.toFinset = l ↔ l.Sorted r := by
refine ⟨?_, List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((sort_perm_toList r _).trans (List.toFinset_toList hl))
(sort_sorted r _)⟩
intro h
rw [← h]
exact sort_sorted r _
end sort
section SortLinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem sort_sorted_lt (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted (· < ·) (sort (· ≤ ·) s) :=
(sort_sorted _ _).lt_of_le (sort_nodup _ _)
theorem sort_sorted_gt (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted (· > ·) (sort (· ≥ ·) s) :=
(sort_sorted _ _).gt_of_ge (sort_nodup _ _)
theorem sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux (s : Finset α) (h : 0 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length) (H : s.Nonempty) :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).get ⟨0, h⟩ = s.min' H := by
let l := s.sort (· ≤ ·)
apply le_antisymm
· have : s.min' H ∈ l := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).mpr (s.min'_mem H)
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, l.get i = s.min' H := List.mem_iff_get.1 this
rw [← hi]
exact (s.sort_sorted (· ≤ ·)).rel_get_of_le (Nat.zero_le i)
· have : l.get ⟨0, h⟩ ∈ s := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).1 (List.get_mem l _)
exact s.min'_le _ this
theorem sorted_zero_eq_min' {s : Finset α} {h : 0 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length} :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[0] = s.min' (card_pos.1 <| by rwa [length_sort] at h) :=
sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux _ _ _
theorem min'_eq_sorted_zero {s : Finset α} {h : s.Nonempty} :
s.min' h = (s.sort (· ≤ ·))[0]'(by rw [length_sort]; exact card_pos.2 h) :=
(sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux _ _ _).symm
theorem sorted_last_eq_max'_aux (s : Finset α)
(h : (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length) (H : s.Nonempty) :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1] = s.max' H := by
let l := s.sort (· ≤ ·)
apply le_antisymm
· have : l.get ⟨(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1, h⟩ ∈ s :=
(Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).1 (List.get_mem l _)
exact s.le_max' _ this
· have : s.max' H ∈ l := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).mpr (s.max'_mem H)
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, l.get i = s.max' H := List.mem_iff_get.1 this
rw [← hi]
exact (s.sort_sorted (· ≤ ·)).rel_get_of_le (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt i.prop)
|
theorem sorted_last_eq_max' {s : Finset α}
{h : (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length} :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1] =
s.max' (by rw [length_sort] at h; exact card_pos.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le h)) :=
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sort.lean | 140 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# L'Hôpital's rule for 0/0 indeterminate forms
In this file, we prove several forms of "L'Hôpital's rule" for computing 0/0
indeterminate forms. The proof of `HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo`
is based on the one given in the corresponding
[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Calculus/L%27H%C3%B4pital%27s_Rule)
chapter, and all other statements are derived from this one by composing by
carefully chosen functions.
Note that the filter `f'/g'` tends to isn't required to be one of `𝓝 a`,
`atTop` or `atBot`. In fact, we give a slightly stronger statement by
allowing it to be any filter on `ℝ`.
Each statement is available in a `HasDerivAt` form and a `deriv` form, which
is denoted by each statement being in either the `HasDerivAt` or the `deriv`
namespace.
## Tags
L'Hôpital's rule, L'Hopital's rule
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Filter Topology Pointwise
variable {a b : ℝ} {l : Filter ℝ} {f f' g g' : ℝ → ℝ}
/-!
## Interval-based versions
We start by proving statements where all conditions (derivability, `g' ≠ 0`) have
to be satisfied on an explicitly-provided interval.
-/
namespace HasDerivAt
theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo (hab : a < b) (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
have sub : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, Ioo a x ⊆ Ioo a b := fun x hx =>
Ioo_subset_Ioo (le_refl a) (le_of_lt hx.2)
have hg : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g x ≠ 0 := by
intro x hx h
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← h, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT hx.1]
exact ((hgg' x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt.mono <| sub x hx).tendsto
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a x, g' c = 0 :=
exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero' hx.1 hga this fun y hy => hgg' y <| sub x hx hy
exact hg' y (sub x hx hyx) hy
have : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, ∃ c ∈ Ioo a x, f x * g' c = g x * f' c := by
intro x hx
rw [← sub_zero (f x), ← sub_zero (g x)]
exact exists_ratio_hasDerivAt_eq_ratio_slope' g g' hx.1 f f' (fun y hy => hgg' y <| sub x hx hy)
(fun y hy => hff' y <| sub x hx hy) hga hfa
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (hgg' x hx).continuousAt.tendsto)
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (hff' x hx).continuousAt.tendsto)
choose! c hc using this
have : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, ((fun x' => f' x' / g' x') ∘ c) x = f x / g x := by
intro x hx
rcases hc x hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
field_simp [hg x hx, hg' (c x) ((sub x hx) h₁)]
simp only [h₂]
rw [mul_comm]
have cmp : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, a < c x ∧ c x < x := fun x hx => (hc x hx).1
rw [← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr this
apply hdiv.comp
refine tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _
(tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id) ?_ ?_) ?_
all_goals
apply eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
intro x hx
have := cmp x hx
try simp
linarith [this]
theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ico (hab : a < b) (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hcf : ContinuousOn f (Ico a b))
(hcg : ContinuousOn g (Ico a b)) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0) (hfa : f a = 0) (hga : g a = 0)
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
refine lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo hab hff' hgg' hg' ?_ ?_ hdiv
· rw [← hfa, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
exact ((hcf a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
· rw [← hga, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
exact ((hcg a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
theorem lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioo (hab : a < b) (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 0)) (hgb : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[<] b) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[<] b) l := by
-- Here, we essentially compose by `Neg.neg`. The following is mostly technical details.
have hdnf : ∀ x ∈ -Ioo a b, HasDerivAt (f ∘ Neg.neg) (f' (-x) * -1) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hff' (-x) hx) (hasDerivAt_neg x)
have hdng : ∀ x ∈ -Ioo a b, HasDerivAt (g ∘ Neg.neg) (g' (-x) * -1) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hgg' (-x) hx) (hasDerivAt_neg x)
rw [neg_Ioo] at hdnf
rw [neg_Ioo] at hdng
have := lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo (neg_lt_neg hab) hdnf hdng (by
intro x hx h
apply hg' _ (by rw [← neg_Ioo] at hx; exact hx)
rwa [mul_comm, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul, neg_eq_zero] at h)
(hfb.comp tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg) (hgb.comp tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg)
(by
simp only [neg_div_neg_eq, mul_one, mul_neg]
exact hdiv.comp tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg)
have := this.comp tendsto_neg_nhdsLT
unfold Function.comp at this
simpa only [neg_neg]
theorem lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioc (hab : a < b) (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hcf : ContinuousOn f (Ioc a b))
(hcg : ContinuousOn g (Ioc a b)) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0) (hfb : f b = 0) (hgb : g b = 0)
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[<] b) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[<] b) l := by
refine lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioo hab hff' hgg' hg' ?_ ?_ hdiv
· rw [← hfb, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT hab]
exact ((hcf b <| right_mem_Ioc.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self).tendsto
· rw [← hgb, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT hab]
exact ((hcg b <| right_mem_Ioc.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self).tendsto
theorem lhopital_zero_atTop_on_Ioi (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hftop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) (hgtop : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) atTop l) : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atTop l := by
obtain ⟨a', haa', ha'⟩ : ∃ a', a < a' ∧ 0 < a' := ⟨1 + max a 0,
⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left a 0) (lt_one_add _),
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right a 0) (lt_one_add _)⟩⟩
have fact1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 a'⁻¹ → x ≠ 0 := fun _ hx => (ne_of_lt hx.1).symm
have fact2 (x) (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 a'⁻¹) : a < x⁻¹ := lt_trans haa' ((lt_inv_comm₀ ha' hx.1).mpr hx.2)
have hdnf : ∀ x ∈ Ioo 0 a'⁻¹, HasDerivAt (f ∘ Inv.inv) (f' x⁻¹ * -(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hff' x⁻¹ <| fact2 x hx) (hasDerivAt_inv <| fact1 x hx)
have hdng : ∀ x ∈ Ioo 0 a'⁻¹, HasDerivAt (g ∘ Inv.inv) (g' x⁻¹ * -(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hgg' x⁻¹ <| fact2 x hx) (hasDerivAt_inv <| fact1 x hx)
have := lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo (inv_pos.mpr ha') hdnf hdng
(by
intro x hx
refine mul_ne_zero ?_ (neg_ne_zero.mpr <| inv_ne_zero <| pow_ne_zero _ <| fact1 x hx)
exact hg' _ (fact2 x hx))
(hftop.comp tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_zero) (hgtop.comp tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_zero)
(by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp (hdiv.comp tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_zero)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x (hx : 0 < x)
simp only [Function.comp_def]
rw [mul_div_mul_right]
exact neg_ne_zero.mpr (by positivity))
have := this.comp tendsto_inv_atTop_nhdsGT_zero
unfold Function.comp at this
simpa only [inv_inv]
theorem lhopital_zero_atBot_on_Iio (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0)) (hgbot : Tendsto g atBot (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) atBot l) : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atBot l := by
-- Here, we essentially compose by `Neg.neg`. The following is mostly technical details.
have hdnf : ∀ x ∈ -Iio a, HasDerivAt (f ∘ Neg.neg) (f' (-x) * -1) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hff' (-x) hx) (hasDerivAt_neg x)
have hdng : ∀ x ∈ -Iio a, HasDerivAt (g ∘ Neg.neg) (g' (-x) * -1) x := fun x hx =>
comp x (hgg' (-x) hx) (hasDerivAt_neg x)
rw [neg_Iio] at hdnf
rw [neg_Iio] at hdng
have := lhopital_zero_atTop_on_Ioi hdnf hdng
(by
intro x hx h
apply hg' _ (by rw [← neg_Iio] at hx; exact hx)
rwa [mul_comm, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul, neg_eq_zero] at h)
(hfbot.comp tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot) (hgbot.comp tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot)
(by
simp only [mul_one, mul_neg, neg_div_neg_eq]
exact (hdiv.comp tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot))
have := this.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
unfold Function.comp at this
simpa only [neg_neg]
end HasDerivAt
namespace deriv
theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo (hab : a < b) (hdf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo a b))
(hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, deriv g x ≠ 0) (hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
have hdf : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := fun x hx =>
(hdf x hx).differentiableAt (Ioo_mem_nhds hx.1 hx.2)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, DifferentiableAt ℝ g x := fun x hx =>
by_contradiction fun h => hg' x hx (deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h)
exact HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo hab (fun x hx => (hdf x hx).hasDerivAt)
(fun x hx => (hdg x hx).hasDerivAt) hg' hfa hga hdiv
theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ico (hab : a < b) (hdf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo a b))
(hcf : ContinuousOn f (Ico a b)) (hcg : ContinuousOn g (Ico a b))
(hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, (deriv g) x ≠ 0) (hfa : f a = 0) (hga : g a = 0)
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
refine lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo hab hdf hg' ?_ ?_ hdiv
· rw [← hfa, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
exact ((hcf a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
· rw [← hga, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
exact ((hcg a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
theorem lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioo (hab : a < b) (hdf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo a b))
(hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, (deriv g) x ≠ 0) (hfb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 0))
(hgb : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) (𝓝[<] b) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[<] b) l := by
have hdf : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := fun x hx =>
(hdf x hx).differentiableAt (Ioo_mem_nhds hx.1 hx.2)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, DifferentiableAt ℝ g x := fun x hx =>
by_contradiction fun h => hg' x hx (deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h)
exact HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioo hab (fun x hx => (hdf x hx).hasDerivAt)
(fun x hx => (hdg x hx).hasDerivAt) hg' hfb hgb hdiv
theorem lhopital_zero_atTop_on_Ioi (hdf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioi a))
(hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, (deriv g) x ≠ 0) (hftop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0))
(hgtop : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 0)) (hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) atTop l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atTop l := by
have hdf : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := fun x hx =>
(hdf x hx).differentiableAt (Ioi_mem_nhds hx)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, DifferentiableAt ℝ g x := fun x hx =>
by_contradiction fun h => hg' x hx (deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h)
exact HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_atTop_on_Ioi (fun x hx => (hdf x hx).hasDerivAt)
(fun x hx => (hdg x hx).hasDerivAt) hg' hftop hgtop hdiv
theorem lhopital_zero_atBot_on_Iio (hdf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Iio a))
(hg' : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, (deriv g) x ≠ 0) (hfbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0))
(hgbot : Tendsto g atBot (𝓝 0)) (hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) atBot l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atBot l := by
have hdf : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := fun x hx =>
(hdf x hx).differentiableAt (Iio_mem_nhds hx)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, DifferentiableAt ℝ g x := fun x hx =>
by_contradiction fun h => hg' x hx (deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h)
exact HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_atBot_on_Iio (fun x hx => (hdf x hx).hasDerivAt)
(fun x hx => (hdg x hx).hasDerivAt) hg' hfbot hgbot hdiv
end deriv
/-!
## Generic versions
The following statements no longer any explicit interval, as they only require
conditions holding eventually.
-/
namespace HasDerivAt
/-- L'Hôpital's rule for approaching a real from the right, `HasDerivAt` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_nhdsGT (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem] at *
rcases hff' with ⟨s₁, hs₁, hff'⟩
rcases hgg' with ⟨s₂, hs₂, hgg'⟩
rcases hg' with ⟨s₃, hs₃, hg'⟩
let s := s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃
have hs : s ∈ 𝓝[>] a := inter_mem (inter_mem hs₁ hs₂) hs₃
rw [mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨u, hau, hu⟩
refine lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo hau ?_ ?_ ?_ hfa hga hdiv <;>
intro x hx <;> apply_assumption <;>
first | exact (hu hx).1.1 | exact (hu hx).1.2 | exact (hu hx).2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias lhopital_zero_nhds_right := lhopital_zero_nhdsGT
/-- L'Hôpital's rule for approaching a real from the left, `HasDerivAt` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_nhdsLT (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[<] a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[<] a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[<] a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[<] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[<] a) l := by
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem] at *
rcases hff' with ⟨s₁, hs₁, hff'⟩
rcases hgg' with ⟨s₂, hs₂, hgg'⟩
rcases hg' with ⟨s₃, hs₃, hg'⟩
let s := s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃
have hs : s ∈ 𝓝[<] a := inter_mem (inter_mem hs₁ hs₂) hs₃
rw [mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨l, hal, hl⟩
refine lhopital_zero_left_on_Ioo hal ?_ ?_ ?_ hfa hga hdiv <;> intro x hx <;> apply_assumption <;>
first | exact (hl hx).1.1| exact (hl hx).1.2| exact (hl hx).2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias lhopital_zero_nhds_left := lhopital_zero_nhdsLT
/-- L'Hôpital's rule for approaching a real, `HasDerivAt` version. This
does not require anything about the situation at `a` -/
theorem lhopital_zero_nhdsNE (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[≠] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[≠] a) l := by
simp only [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup, eventually_sup] at *
exact ⟨lhopital_zero_nhdsLT hff'.1 hgg'.1 hg'.1 hfa.1 hga.1 hdiv.1,
lhopital_zero_nhdsGT hff'.2 hgg'.2 hg'.2 hfa.2 hga.2 hdiv.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias lhopital_zero_nhds' := lhopital_zero_nhdsNE
/-- **L'Hôpital's rule** for approaching a real, `HasDerivAt` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_nhds (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝 a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[≠] a) l := by
apply @lhopital_zero_nhdsNE _ _ _ f' _ g' <;>
(first | apply eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds |
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds) <;> assumption
/-- L'Hôpital's rule for approaching +∞, `HasDerivAt` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_atTop (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, g' x ≠ 0)
(hftop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) (hgtop : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) atTop l) : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atTop l := by
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem] at *
rcases hff' with ⟨s₁, hs₁, hff'⟩
rcases hgg' with ⟨s₂, hs₂, hgg'⟩
rcases hg' with ⟨s₃, hs₃, hg'⟩
let s := s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃
have hs : s ∈ atTop := inter_mem (inter_mem hs₁ hs₂) hs₃
rw [mem_atTop_sets] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨l, hl⟩
have hl' : Ioi l ⊆ s := fun x hx => hl x (le_of_lt hx)
refine lhopital_zero_atTop_on_Ioi ?_ ?_ (fun x hx => hg' x <| (hl' hx).2) hftop hgtop hdiv <;>
intro x hx <;> apply_assumption <;> first | exact (hl' hx).1.1| exact (hl' hx).1.2
/-- L'Hôpital's rule for approaching -∞, `HasDerivAt` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_atBot (hff' : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ᶠ x in atBot, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0)) (hgbot : Tendsto g atBot (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) atBot l) : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) atBot l := by
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem] at *
rcases hff' with ⟨s₁, hs₁, hff'⟩
rcases hgg' with ⟨s₂, hs₂, hgg'⟩
rcases hg' with ⟨s₃, hs₃, hg'⟩
let s := s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃
have hs : s ∈ atBot := inter_mem (inter_mem hs₁ hs₂) hs₃
rw [mem_atBot_sets] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨l, hl⟩
have hl' : Iio l ⊆ s := fun x hx => hl x (le_of_lt hx)
| refine lhopital_zero_atBot_on_Iio ?_ ?_ (fun x hx => hg' x <| (hl' hx).2) hfbot hgbot hdiv <;>
intro x hx <;> apply_assumption <;> first | exact (hl' hx).1.1| exact (hl' hx).1.2
end HasDerivAt
namespace deriv
/-- **L'Hôpital's rule** for approaching a real from the right, `deriv` version -/
theorem lhopital_zero_nhdsGT (hdf : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(hg' : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, deriv g x ≠ 0) (hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => (deriv f) x / (deriv g) x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
have hdg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] a, DifferentiableAt ℝ g x :=
hg'.mono fun _ hg' => by_contradiction fun h => hg' (deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LHopital.lean | 358 | 372 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# The homology of single complexes
The main definition in this file is `HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctorSingleIso`
which is a natural isomorphism `single C c j ⋙ homologyFunctor C c j ≅ 𝟭 C`.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroObject C]
{ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι) (j : ι)
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (A : C)
instance (i : ι) : ((single C c j).obj A).HasHomology i := by
apply ShortComplex.hasHomology_of_zeros
lemma exactAt_single_obj (A : C) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
ExactAt ((single C c j).obj A) i :=
ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂ _ (isZero_single_obj_X c _ _ _ hi)
lemma isZero_single_obj_homology (A : C) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single C c j).obj A).homology i) := by
simpa only [← exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
using exactAt_single_obj c j A i hi
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((single C c j).obj A).cycles j ≅ A` -/
noncomputable def singleObjCyclesSelfIso :
((single C c j).obj A).cycles j ≅ A :=
((single C c j).obj A).iCyclesIso j _ rfl rfl ≪≫ singleObjXSelf c j A
@[reassoc]
lemma singleObjCyclesSelfIso_hom :
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso c j A).hom =
((single C c j).obj A).iCycles j ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom := rfl
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((single C c j).obj A).opcycles j ≅ A` -/
noncomputable def singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso :
A ≅ ((single C c j).obj A).opcycles j :=
(singleObjXSelf c j A).symm ≪≫ ((single C c j).obj A).pOpcyclesIso _ j rfl rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso_hom :
(singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso c j A).hom =
(singleObjXSelf c j A).inv ≫ ((single C c j).obj A).pOpcycles j := rfl
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((single C c j).obj A).homology j ≅ A` -/
noncomputable def singleObjHomologySelfIso :
((single C c j).obj A).homology j ≅ A :=
(((single C c j).obj A).isoHomologyπ _ j rfl rfl).symm ≪≫ singleObjCyclesSelfIso c j A
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma singleObjCyclesSelfIso_inv_iCycles :
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso _ _ _).inv ≫ ((single C c j).obj A).iCycles j =
(singleObjXSelf c j A).inv := by
simp [singleObjCyclesSelfIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_singleObjHomologySelfIso_hom :
((single C c j).obj A).homologyπ j ≫ (singleObjHomologySelfIso _ _ _).hom =
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso _ _ _).hom := by
simp [singleObjCyclesSelfIso, singleObjHomologySelfIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma singleObjHomologySelfIso_hom_singleObjHomologySelfIso_inv :
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso c j A).hom ≫ (singleObjHomologySelfIso c j A).inv =
((single C c j).obj A).homologyπ j := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (singleObjHomologySelfIso _ _ _).hom, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id, homologyπ_singleObjHomologySelfIso_hom]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma singleObjCyclesSelfIso_hom_singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso_hom :
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso c j A).hom ≫ (singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso c j A).hom =
((single C c j).obj A).iCycles j ≫ ((single C c j).obj A).pOpcycles j := by
simp [singleObjCyclesSelfIso, singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma singleObjCyclesSelfIso_inv_homologyπ :
(singleObjCyclesSelfIso _ _ _).inv ≫ ((single C c j).obj A).homologyπ j =
(singleObjHomologySelfIso _ _ _).inv := by
simp [singleObjCyclesSelfIso, singleObjHomologySelfIso]
| @[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma singleObjHomologySelfIso_inv_homologyι :
(singleObjHomologySelfIso _ _ _).inv ≫ ((single C c j).obj A).homologyι j =
(singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso _ _ _).hom := by
rw [← cancel_epi (singleObjCyclesSelfIso c j A).hom,
singleObjHomologySelfIso_hom_singleObjHomologySelfIso_inv_assoc, homology_π_ι,
singleObjCyclesSelfIso_hom_singleObjOpcyclesSelfIso_hom]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/SingleHomology.lean | 95 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp_assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
end Zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg [NegZeroClass R] {M : Matrix m m R}
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => by rw [neg_apply, hM h, neg_zero]
theorem BlockTriangular.add [AddZeroClass R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
theorem BlockTriangular.sub [SubNegZeroMonoid R]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.sub_apply, hM h, hN h, sub_zero]
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using hM.neg.add ·), hM.add⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.sub hN), (·.add hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.neg.add hM), hM.sub⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.add hN), (·.sub hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.map {S F} [FunLike F R S] [Zero R] [Zero S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(h : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (M.map f) b :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
lemma BlockTriangular.comp [Zero R] {M : Matrix m m (Matrix n n R)} (h : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M.comp m m n n R) fun i ↦ b i.1 :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
|
end LT
section Preorder
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 115 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp [Pi.single_apply]
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts Module
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
theorem isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
namespace Measure
/-!
### Strict subspaces have zero measure
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. This auxiliary lemma proves this assuming additionally that the set is bounded. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
/-- A strict vector subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti₀ cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ H, one_smul]
exact hx this
/-- A strict affine subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
/-!
### Applying a linear map rescales Haar measure by the determinant
We first prove this on `ι → ℝ`, using that this is already known for the product Lebesgue
measure (thanks to matrices computations). Then, we extend this to any finite-dimensional real
vector space by using a linear equiv with a space of the form `ι → ℝ`, and arguing that such a
linear equiv maps Haar measure to Haar measure.
-/
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
/- We have already proved the result for the Lebesgue product measure, using matrices.
We deduce it for any Haar measure by uniqueness (up to scalar multiplication). -/
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearMap {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map f μ s :=
((f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply
s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s := by
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]; rfl
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap {f : E →L[ℝ] E}
(hf : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E))⁻¹) * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ hf s
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s := by
have A : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0 := (LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' f).ne_zero
convert addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ A s
simp only [LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det f| * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq (LinearMap.det f) 0 with (hf | hf)
· let g := (f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
change μ (g '' s) = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.image_eq_preimage g s, addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv]
congr
· simp only [hf, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero]
have : μ (LinearMap.range f) = 0 :=
addHaar_submodule μ _ (LinearMap.range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero hf).ne
exact le_antisymm (le_trans (measure_mono (image_subset_range _ _)) this.le) (zero_le _)
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_image_linearMap μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
μ.addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) s
theorem LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ := by
refine ⟨f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable, ?_⟩
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (hf : f.det ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ :=
LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving μ (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) hf
/-!
### Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
theorem map_addHaar_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (r • ·) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) • μ := by
let f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E := r • (1 : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)
change Measure.map f μ = _
have hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [f, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, Ne, MonoidHom.map_one]
intro h
exact hr (pow_eq_zero h)
simp only [f, map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, map_one]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (r • ·) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_const_smul r, ?_⟩
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s :=
calc
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (r • ·) μ s :=
((Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hr).unit).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
| _ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s := by
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
/-- Rescaling a set by a factor `r` multiplies its measure by `abs (r ^ dim)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_smul (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq r 0 with (h | rfl)
· rw [← preimage_smul_inv₀ h, addHaar_preimage_smul μ (inv_ne_zero h), inv_pow, inv_inv]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 357 | 365 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,216 | 1,229 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# Convexity of functions and derivatives
Here we relate convexity of functions `ℝ → ℝ` to properties of their derivatives.
## Main results
* `MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv`, `convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg` : if the derivative of a function
is increasing or its second derivative is nonnegative, then the original function is convex.
* `ConvexOn.monotoneOn_deriv`: if a function is convex and differentiable, then its derivative is
monotone.
-/
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-!
## Monotonicity of `f'` implies convexity of `f`
-/
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is monotone on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(hf'_mono : MonotoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_slope_mono_adjacent hD
(by
intro x y z hx hz hxy hyz
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we apply MVT to both `[x, y]` and `[y, z]`
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy (hf.mono hxyD) (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b = (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hyz (hf.mono hyzD) (hf'.mono hyzD')
rw [← ha, ← hb]
exact hf'_mono (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb).le)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is antitone on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.concaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(h_anti : AntitoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
haveI : MonotoneOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by
simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_convexOn_iff.mp (this.convexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg hf'.neg)
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hay with ⟨b, ⟨hab, hby⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, hay⟩ ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩ hab
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
· apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux hf hxy hf'_mono h
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨w, ⟨hxw, hwy⟩, hw⟩
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x w, (f w - f x) / (w - x) < deriv f a := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hxw _ _
· exact hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl hwy.le)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl hwy.le)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_lt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ hz.2
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hwb, hby⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo w y, (f y - f w) / (y - w) < deriv f b := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hwy _ _
· refine hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc hxw.le le_rfl)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo hxw.le le_rfl)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_gt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩ hz.1
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [div_lt_iff₀, hxy, hxw, hwy, sub_pos] at ha hb ⊢
have : deriv f a * (w - x) < deriv f b * (w - x) := by
apply mul_lt_mul _ le_rfl (sub_pos.2 hxw) _
· exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ (haw.trans hwb)
· rw [← hw]
exact (hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ hwb).le
linarith
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hxa with ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩ ⟨hxa, hay⟩ hba
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
· apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux hf hxy hf'_mono h
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨w, ⟨hxw, hwy⟩, hw⟩
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x w, deriv f a < (f w - f x) / (w - x) := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux _ hxw _ _
· exact hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl hwy.le)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl hwy.le)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_lt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ hz.2
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hwb, hby⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo w y, deriv f b < (f y - f w) / (y - w) := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux _ hwy _ _
· refine hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc hxw.le le_rfl)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo hxw.le le_rfl)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_gt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩ hz.1
refine ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [lt_div_iff₀, hxy, hxw, hwy, sub_pos] at ha hb ⊢
have : deriv f a * (y - w) < deriv f b * (y - w) := by
apply mul_lt_mul _ le_rfl (sub_pos.2 hwy) _
· exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ (haw.trans hwb)
· rw [← hw]
exact (hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ hwb).le
linarith
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, and `f'` is strictly monotone on the
interior, then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict monotonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictMonoOn.strictConvexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
strictConvexOn_of_slope_strict_mono_adjacent hD fun {x y z} hx hz hxy hyz => by
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we get points `a` and `b` in each interval `[x, y]` and `[y, z]` where the derivatives
-- can be compared to the slopes between `x, y` and `y, z` respectively.
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a :=
StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv (hf.mono hxyD) hxy (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b < (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope (hf.mono hyzD) hyz (hf'.mono hyzD')
apply ha.trans (lt_trans _ hb)
exact hf' (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f'` is strictly antitone on the
interior, then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict antitonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictAntiOn.strictConcaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (h_anti : StrictAntiOn (deriv f) (interior D)) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
have : StrictMonoOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_neg f ▸ (this.strictConvexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg).neg
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable and `f'` is monotone on `ℝ` then `f` is convex. -/
theorem Monotone.convexOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'_mono : Monotone (deriv f)) : ConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_mono.monotoneOn _).convexOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuous.continuousOn
hf.differentiableOn
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable and `f'` is antitone on `ℝ` then `f` is concave. -/
theorem Antitone.concaveOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'_anti : Antitone (deriv f)) : ConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_anti.antitoneOn _).concaveOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuous.continuousOn
hf.differentiableOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous and `f'` is strictly monotone on `ℝ` then `f` is strictly
convex. Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict monotonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictMono.strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'_mono : StrictMono (deriv f)) : StrictConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_mono.strictMonoOn _).strictConvexOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuousOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous and `f'` is strictly antitone on `ℝ` then `f` is strictly
concave. Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict antitonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictAnti.strictConcaveOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'_anti : StrictAnti (deriv f)) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_anti.strictAntiOn _).strictConcaveOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuousOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonnegative on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f D)
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D)) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) (interior D))
(hf''_nonneg : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 ≤ deriv^[2] f x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
(monotoneOn_of_deriv_nonneg hD.interior hf''.continuousOn (by rwa [interior_interior]) <| by
rwa [interior_interior]).convexOn_of_deriv
hD hf hf'
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonpositive on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f D)
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D)) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) (interior D))
(hf''_nonpos : ∀ x ∈ interior D, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
(antitoneOn_of_deriv_nonpos hD.interior hf''.continuousOn (by rwa [interior_interior]) <| by
rwa [interior_interior]).concaveOn_of_deriv
hD hf hf'
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonnegative on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
lemma convexOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonneg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f f' f'' : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (interior D) x)
(hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f' (f'' x) (interior D) x)
(hf''₀ : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 ≤ f'' x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f := by
have : (interior D).EqOn (deriv f) f' := deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior hf'
refine convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg hD hf (fun x hx ↦ (hf' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableOn_congr this]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hf'' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt
· rintro x hx
convert hf''₀ _ hx using 1
dsimp
rw [deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior (fun y hy ↦ ?_) hx]
exact (hf'' _ hy).congr this <| by rw [this hy]
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonpositive on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
lemma concaveOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonpos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f f' f'' : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (interior D) x)
(hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f' (f'' x) (interior D) x)
(hf''₀ : ∀ x ∈ interior D, f'' x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f := by
have : (interior D).EqOn (deriv f) f' := deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior hf'
refine concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos hD hf (fun x hx ↦ (hf' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableOn_congr this]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hf'' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt
· rintro x hx
convert hf''₀ _ hx using 1
dsimp
rw [deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior (fun y hy ↦ ?_) hx]
exact (hf'' _ hy).congr this <| by rw [this hy]
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly positive on the
interior, then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
((strictMonoOn_of_deriv_pos hD.interior fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
(hf'' z hz).ne').differentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt) <|
by rwa [interior_interior]).strictConvexOn_of_deriv
hD hf
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly negative on the
interior, then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, deriv^[2] f x < 0) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
((strictAntiOn_of_deriv_neg hD.interior fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
(hf'' z hz).ne).differentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt) <|
by rwa [interior_interior]).strictConcaveOn_of_deriv
hD hf
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on an open convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and
`f''` is nonnegative on `D`, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f D) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) D)
(hf''_nonneg : ∀ x ∈ D, 0 ≤ (deriv^[2] f) x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg hD hf'.continuousOn (hf'.mono interior_subset)
(hf''.mono interior_subset) fun x hx => hf''_nonneg x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on an open convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and
`f''` is nonpositive on `D`, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f D) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) D)
(hf''_nonpos : ∀ x ∈ D, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos hD hf'.continuousOn (hf'.mono interior_subset)
(hf''.mono interior_subset) fun x hx => hf''_nonpos x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly positive on `D`,
then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ D, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) : StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos hD hf fun x hx => hf'' x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly negative on `D`,
then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ D, deriv^[2] f x < 0) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg hD hf fun x hx => hf'' x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on `ℝ`, and `f''` is nonnegative on `ℝ`,
then `f` is convex on `ℝ`. -/
theorem convexOn_univ_of_deriv2_nonneg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf' : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'' : Differentiable ℝ (deriv f)) (hf''_nonneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ (deriv^[2] f) x) :
ConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg' convex_univ hf'.differentiableOn hf''.differentiableOn fun x _ =>
hf''_nonneg x
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on `ℝ`, and `f''` is nonpositive on `ℝ`,
then `f` is concave on `ℝ`. -/
theorem concaveOn_univ_of_deriv2_nonpos {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf' : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'' : Differentiable ℝ (deriv f)) (hf''_nonpos : ∀ x, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) :
ConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos' convex_univ hf'.differentiableOn hf''.differentiableOn fun x _ =>
hf''_nonpos x
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on `ℝ`, and `f''` is strictly positive on `ℝ`,
then `f` is strictly convex on `ℝ`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv2_pos {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'' : ∀ x, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) : StrictConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' convex_univ hf.continuousOn fun x _ => hf'' x
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on `ℝ`, and `f''` is strictly negative on `ℝ`,
then `f` is strictly concave on `ℝ`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_univ_of_deriv2_neg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'' : ∀ x, deriv^[2] f x < 0) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg' convex_univ hf.continuousOn fun x _ => hf'' x
/-!
## Convexity of `f` implies monotonicity of `f'`
In this section we prove inequalities relating derivatives of convex functions to slopes of secant
lines, and deduce that if `f` is convex then its derivative is monotone (and similarly for strict
convexity / strict monotonicity).
-/
section slope
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
{s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is convex on `s`, then for any point `x ∈ s` the slope of the secant line of `f`
through `x` is monotone on `s \ {x}`. -/
lemma ConvexOn.slope_mono (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) : MonotoneOn (slope f x) (s \ {x}) :=
(slope_fun_def_field f _).symm ▸ fun _ hy _ hz hz' ↦ hfc.secant_mono hx (mem_of_mem_diff hy)
(mem_of_mem_diff hz) (not_mem_of_mem_diff hy :) (not_mem_of_mem_diff hz :) hz'
lemma ConvexOn.monotoneOn_slope_gt (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
MonotoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | x < y} :=
(hfc.slope_mono hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne'⟩
lemma ConvexOn.monotoneOn_slope_lt (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
MonotoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | y < x} :=
(hfc.slope_mono hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne⟩
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is concave on `s`, then for any point `x ∈ s` the slope of the secant line of `f`
through `x` is antitone on `s \ {x}`. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.slope_anti (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) (s \ {x}) := by
rw [← neg_neg f, slope_neg_fun]
exact (ConvexOn.slope_mono hfc.neg hx).neg
lemma ConcaveOn.antitoneOn_slope_gt (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | x < y} :=
(hfc.slope_anti hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne'⟩
lemma ConcaveOn.antitoneOn_slope_lt (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | y < x} :=
(hfc.slope_anti hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
lemma bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ interior s) :
BddBelow (slope f x '' {y ∈ s | x < y}) := by
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hys⟩ : ∃ y, y < x ∧ y ∈ s :=
Eventually.exists_lt (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mp hxs)
refine bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici.mpr ⟨slope f x y, fun y' ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ici, ← hz']
refine hfc.slope_mono (interior_subset hxs) ?_ ?_ (hyx.trans hz.2).le
· simp [hys, hyx.ne]
· simp [hz.2.ne', hz.1]
lemma bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ interior s) :
BddAbove (slope f x '' {y ∈ s | y < x}) := by
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hys⟩ : ∃ y, x < y ∧ y ∈ s :=
Eventually.exists_gt (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mp hxs)
refine bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic.mpr ⟨slope f x y, fun y' ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_Iic, ← hz']
refine hfc.slope_mono (interior_subset hxs) ?_ ?_ (hz.2.trans hyx).le
· simp [hz.2.ne, hz.1]
· simp [hys, hyx.ne']
end slope
namespace ConvexOn
variable {S : Set ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x y f' : ℝ}
section Interior
/-!
### Left and right derivative of a convex function in the interior of the set
-/
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (sInf (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | x < y})) (Ioi x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope]
simp only [mem_Ioi, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true, diff_singleton_eq_self]
have h : Ioo x b ⊆ {y | y ∈ S ∧ x < y} := fun z hz ↦ ⟨habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩, hz.1⟩
have h_Ioo : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝 (sInf (slope f x '' Ioo x b))) :=
((monotoneOn_slope_gt hfc (habs hxab)).mono h).tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioo_right
(by simpa using hxab.2) ((bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs).mono (image_subset _ h))
suffices sInf (slope f x '' Ioo x b) = sInf (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | x < y}) by rwa [← this]
apply (monotoneOn_slope_gt hfc (habs hxab)).csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
(bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs) h ?_
rintro y ⟨hyS, hxy⟩
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_between (lt_min hxab.2 hxy)
exact ⟨z, ⟨hxz, hzy.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩, hzy.le.trans (min_le_right _ _)⟩
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (sSup (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | y < x})) (Iio x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope]
simp only [mem_Iio, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true, diff_singleton_eq_self]
have h : Ioo a x ⊆ {y | y ∈ S ∧ y < x} := fun z hz ↦ ⟨habs ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hxab.2⟩, hz.2⟩
have h_Ioo : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (sSup (slope f x '' Ioo a x))) :=
((monotoneOn_slope_lt hfc (habs hxab)).mono h).tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioo_left
(by simpa using hxab.1) ((bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs).mono (image_subset _ h))
suffices sSup (slope f x '' Ioo a x) = sSup (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | y < x}) by rwa [← this]
apply (monotoneOn_slope_lt hfc (habs hxab)).csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
(bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs) h ?_
rintro y ⟨hyS, hyx⟩
obtain ⟨z, hyz, hzx⟩ := exists_between (max_lt hxab.1 hyx)
exact ⟨z, ⟨(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt hyz, hzx⟩, (le_max_right _ _).trans hyz.le⟩
lemma differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).differentiableWithinAt
lemma differentiableWithinAt_Iio_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Iio x) x :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).differentiableWithinAt
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_rightDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) (Ioi x) x :=
(hfc.differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior hxs).hasDerivWithinAt
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_leftDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Iio x) x) (Iio x) x :=
(hfc.differentiableWithinAt_Iio_of_mem_interior hxs).hasDerivWithinAt
lemma rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x = sInf (slope f x '' {y | y ∈ S ∧ x < y}) :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Ioi x)
lemma leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Iio x) x = sSup (slope f x '' {y | y ∈ S ∧ y < x}) :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Iio x)
lemma monotoneOn_rightDeriv (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) :
MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) (interior S) := by
intro x hxs y hys hxy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxy with rfl | hxy; · rfl
simp_rw [hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hys]
refine csInf_le_of_le (b := slope f x y) (bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs)
⟨y, by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hxy, and_true]; exact interior_subset hys⟩
(le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· have hys' := hys
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hys'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hys'
rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.2
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hxz, hzb⟩, hxz⟩
· rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hyz : y < z⟩, rfl⟩
rw [slope_comm]
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hys) ⟨interior_subset hxs, hxy.ne⟩ ⟨hzs, hyz.ne'⟩
(hxy.trans hyz).le
lemma monotoneOn_leftDeriv (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) :
MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Iio x) x) (interior S) := by
intro x hxs y hys hxy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxy with rfl | hxy; · rfl
simp_rw [hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hys]
refine le_csSup_of_le (b := slope f x y) (bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hys)
⟨x, by simp only [slope_comm, mem_setOf_eq, hxy, and_true]; exact interior_subset hxs⟩
(csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.1
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxz, hzb.trans hxab.2⟩, hzb⟩
· rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hyz : z < x⟩, rfl⟩
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hxs) ⟨hzs, hyz.ne⟩ ⟨interior_subset hys, hxy.ne'⟩
(hyz.trans hxy).le
lemma leftDeriv_le_rightDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Iio x) x ≤ derivWithin f (Ioi x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
rw [hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs]
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, haz, hzx⟩ := exists_between hxab.1
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨haz, hzx.trans hxab.2⟩, hzx⟩
rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hzx⟩, rfl⟩
refine le_csInf ?_ ?_
· rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.2
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hxz, hzb⟩, hxz⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, ⟨hys, hxy⟩, rfl⟩
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hxs) ⟨hzs, hzx.ne⟩ ⟨hys, hxy.ne'⟩ (hzx.trans hxy).le
end Interior
section left
/-!
### Convex functions, derivative at left endpoint of secant
-/
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and right-differentiable at `x ∈ S`, then the slope of any
secant line with left endpoint at `x` is bounded below by the right derivative of `f` at `x`. -/
lemma le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f)
(hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y) (hf' : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x) :
f' ≤ slope f x y := by
apply le_of_tendsto <| (hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' not_mem_Ioi_self).mp hf'
simp_rw [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff, slope_def_field]
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds hxy] with t ht (ht' : x < t)
refine hfc.secant_mono hx (?_ : t ∈ S) hy ht'.ne' hxy.ne' ht.le
exact hfc.1.ordConnected.out hx hy ⟨ht'.le, ht.le⟩
/-- Reformulation of `ConvexOn.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi` using `derivWithin`. -/
lemma rightDeriv_le_slope (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hfd : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x ≤ slope f x y :=
le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi hfc hx hy hxy hfd.hasDerivWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-26")]
alias right_deriv_le_slope := rightDeriv_le_slope
lemma rightDeriv_le_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f)
{y : ℝ} (hxs : x ∈ interior S) (hys : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x ≤ slope f x y :=
rightDeriv_le_slope hfc (interior_subset hxs) hys hxy
(differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior hfc hxs)
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and differentiable within `S` at `x`, then the slope of any
secant line with left endpoint at `x` is bounded below by the derivative of `f` within `S` at `x`.
This is fractionally weaker than `ConvexOn.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi` but simpler to apply
under a `DifferentiableOn S` hypothesis. -/
lemma le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hf' : HasDerivWithinAt f f' S x) :
f' ≤ slope f x y :=
hfc.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi hx hy hxy <|
hf'.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hfc.1.ordConnected.mem_nhdsGT hx hy hxy
/-- Reformulation of `ConvexOn.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt` using `derivWithin`. -/
lemma derivWithin_le_slope (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hfd : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f S x) :
derivWithin f S x ≤ slope f x y :=
le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt hfc hx hy hxy hfd.hasDerivWithinAt
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and differentiable at `x ∈ S`, then the slope of any secant
line with left endpoint at `x` is bounded below by the derivative of `f` at `x`. -/
lemma le_slope_of_hasDerivAt (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(ha : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
f' ≤ slope f x y :=
hfc.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi hx hy hxy ha.hasDerivWithinAt
/-- Reformulation of `ConvexOn.le_slope_of_hasDerivAt` using `deriv` -/
lemma deriv_le_slope (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hfd : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) :
deriv f x ≤ slope f x y :=
le_slope_of_hasDerivAt hfc hx hy hxy hfd.hasDerivAt
end left
section right
/-!
### Convex functions, derivative at right endpoint of secant
-/
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and left-differentiable at `y ∈ S`, then the slope of any secant
line with right endpoint at `y` is bounded above by the left derivative of `f` at `y`. -/
lemma slope_le_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Iio (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f)
(hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y) (hf' : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio y) y) :
slope f x y ≤ f' := by
| apply ge_of_tendsto <| (hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' not_mem_Iio_self).mp hf'
simp_rw [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff, slope_comm f x y, slope_def_field]
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_nhds hxy] with t ht (ht' : t < y)
refine hfc.secant_mono hy hx (?_ : t ∈ S) hxy.ne ht'.ne ht.le
exact hfc.1.ordConnected.out hx hy ⟨ht.le, ht'.le⟩
/-- Reformulation of `ConvexOn.slope_le_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Iio` using `derivWithin`. -/
lemma slope_le_leftDeriv (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hfd : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Iio y) y) :
slope f x y ≤ derivWithin f (Iio y) y :=
hfc.slope_le_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Iio hx hy hxy hfd.hasDerivWithinAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Deriv.lean | 619 | 630 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
| positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 539 | 541 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Uniqueness
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DiffContOnCl
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DSlope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.ReImTopology
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DivergenceTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Complex
/-!
# Cauchy integral formula
In this file we prove the Cauchy-Goursat theorem and the Cauchy integral formula for integrals over
circles. Most results are formulated for a function `f : ℂ → E` that takes values in a complex
Banach space with second countable topology.
## Main statements
In the following theorems, if the name ends with `off_countable`, then the actual theorem assumes
differentiability at all but countably many points of the set mentioned below.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and *real* differentiable on its interior, then
its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to the integral of
`I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I` over the rectangle, where `f' z w : E` is the derivative
of `f` at `z` in the direction `w` and `I = Complex.I` is the imaginary unit.
* `Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`: If a function
`f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle and is *complex* differentiable on its interior,
then its integral over the boundary of this rectangle is equal to zero.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable`: If a
function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed annulus `{z | r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R}` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `{z | r < |z - c| < R}`, then the integrals of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z`
over the outer boundary and over the inner boundary are equal.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto`,
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`:
If a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a punctured closed disc `{z | |z - c| ≤ R ∧ z ≠ c}`, is
complex differentiable on the corresponding punctured open disc, and tends to `y` as `z → c`,
`z ≠ c`, then the integral of `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` over the circle `|z - c| = R` is equal to
`2πiy`. In particular, if `f` is continuous on the whole closed disc and is complex differentiable
on the corresponding open disc, then this integral is equal to `2πif(c)`.
* `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`,
`Complex.two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`
**Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc, then for any `w` in the corresponding open
disc the integral of `(z - w)⁻¹ • f z` over the boundary of the disc is equal to `2πif(w)`.
Two versions of the lemma put the multiplier `2πi` at the different sides of the equality.
* `Complex.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_of_differentiable_off_countable`: If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous
on a closed disc of positive radius and is complex differentiable on the corresponding open disc,
then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the coefficients of the power series are
given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is complex differentiable on a
closed disc of positive radius, then it is analytic on the corresponding open disc, and the
coefficients of the power series are given by Cauchy integral formulas.
* `DifferentiableOn.analyticAt`, `Differentiable.analyticAt`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable
on a neighborhood of a point, then it is analytic at this point. In particular, if `f : ℂ → E`
is differentiable on the whole `ℂ`, then it is analytic at every point `z : ℂ`.
* `Differentiable.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`: If `f : ℂ → E` is differentiable everywhere then the
`cauchyPowerSeries f z R` is a formal power series representing `f` at `z` with infinite
radius of convergence (this holds for any choice of `0 < R`).
## Implementation details
The proof of the Cauchy integral formula in this file is based on a very general version of the
divergence theorem, see `MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable`
(a version for functions defined on `Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`),
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_prod_Icc_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_of_le`, and
`MeasureTheory.integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable` (versions for
functions defined on `ℝ × ℝ`).
Usually, the divergence theorem is formulated for a $C^1$ smooth function. The theorems formulated
above deal with a function that is
* continuous on a closed box/rectangle;
* differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior;
* have divergence integrable over the closed box/rectangle.
First, we reformulate the theorem for a *real*-differentiable map `ℂ → E`, and relate the integral
of `f` over the boundary of a rectangle in `ℂ` to the integral of the derivative
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ over the interior of this box. In particular, for a *complex*
differentiable function, the latter derivative is zero, hence the integral over the boundary of a
rectangle is zero. Thus we get the Cauchy-Goursat theorem for a rectangle in `ℂ`.
Next, we apply this theorem to the function $F(z)=f(c+e^{z})$ on the rectangle
$[\ln r, \ln R]\times [0, 2\pi]$ to prove that
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=r}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed annulus `r ≤ |z - c| ≤ R` and is complex
differentiable on its interior `r < |z - c| < R` (possibly, at all but countably many points).
Here and below, we write $\frac{f(z)}{z-c}$ in the documentation while the actual lemmas use
`(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` because `f z` belongs to some Banach space over `ℂ` and `f z / (z - c)` is
undefined.
Taking the limit of this equality as `r` tends to `𝓝[>] 0`, we prove
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R}\frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-c}=2\pi if(c)
$$
provided that `f` is continuous on the closed disc `|z - c| ≤ R` and is differentiable at all but
countably many points of its interior. This is the Cauchy integral formula for the center of a
circle. In particular, if we apply this function to `F z = (z - c) • f z`, then we get
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz=0.
$$
In order to deduce the Cauchy integral formula for any point `w`, `|w - c| < R`, we consider the
slope function `g : ℂ → E` given by `g z = (z - w)⁻¹ • (f z - f w)` if `z ≠ w` and `g w = f' w`.
This function satisfies assumptions of the previous theorem, so we have
$$
\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(z)\,dz}{z-w}=\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(w)\,dz}{z-w}=
\left(\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{dz}{z-w}\right)f(w).
$$
The latter integral was computed in `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball` and is equal to
`2 * π * Complex.I`.
There is one more step in the actual proof. Since we allow `f` to be non-differentiable on a
countable set `s`, we cannot immediately claim that `g` is continuous at `w` if `w ∈ s`. So, we use
the proof outlined in the previous paragraph for `w ∉ s` (see
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux`), then use continuity
of both sides of the formula and density of `sᶜ` to prove the formula for all points of the open
ball, see `Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`.
Finally, we use the properties of the Cauchy integrals established elsewhere (see
`hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`) and Cauchy integral formula to prove that the original
function is analytic on the open ball.
## Tags
Cauchy-Goursat theorem, Cauchy integral formula
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set MeasureTheory intervalIntegral Metric Filter Function
open scoped Interval Real NNReal ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
namespace Complex
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the
integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I := by
set e : (ℝ × ℝ) ≃L[ℝ] ℂ := equivRealProdCLM.symm
have he : ∀ x y : ℝ, ↑x + ↑y * I = e (x, y) := fun x y => (mk_eq_add_mul_I x y).symm
have he₁ : e (1, 0) = 1 := rfl; have he₂ : e (0, 1) = I := rfl
simp only [he] at *
set F : ℝ × ℝ → E := f ∘ e
set F' : ℝ × ℝ → ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] E := fun p => (f' (e p)).comp (e : ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ)
have hF' : ∀ p : ℝ × ℝ, (-(I • F' p)) (1, 0) + F' p (0, 1) = -(I • f' (e p) 1 - f' (e p) I) := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [F', ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, he₁, he₂, neg_add_eq_sub,
neg_sub]
set R : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := [[z.re, w.re]] ×ˢ [[w.im, z.im]]
set t : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := e ⁻¹' s
rw [uIcc_comm z.im] at Hc Hi; rw [min_comm z.im, max_comm z.im] at Hd
have hR : e ⁻¹' ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[w.im, z.im]]) = R := rfl
have htc : ContinuousOn F R := Hc.comp e.continuousOn hR.ge
have htd :
∀ p ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ˢ Ioo (min w.im z.im) (max w.im z.im) \ t,
HasFDerivAt F (F' p) p :=
fun p hp => (Hd (e p) hp).comp p e.hasFDerivAt
simp_rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_symm w.im z.im, ←
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, ← hF']
refine (integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable (fun p => -(I • F p)) F
(fun p => -(I • F' p)) F' z.re w.im w.re z.im t (hs.preimage e.injective)
(htc.const_smul _).neg htc (fun p hp => ((htd p hp).const_smul I).neg) htd ?_).symm
rw [← (volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm _).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)] at Hi
simpa only [hF'] using Hi.neg
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed rectangle with opposite corners at
`z w : ℂ`, is *real* differentiable on the corresponding open rectangle, and
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then the integral of `f` over
the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im),
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f f' z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
(fun x hx => Hd x hx.1) Hi
/-- Suppose that a function `f : ℂ → E` is *real* differentiable on a closed rectangle with opposite
corners at `z w : ℂ` and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}$ is integrable on this rectangle. Then
the integral of `f` over the boundary of the rectangle is equal to the integral of
$2i\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}=i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$
over the rectangle. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℝ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • fderiv ℝ f z 1 - fderiv ℝ f z I)
([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im,
I • fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) 1 - fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f (fderiv ℝ f) z w ∅ countable_empty
Hd.continuousOn
(fun x hx => Hd.hasFDerivAt <| by
simpa only [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_reProdIm, uIcc, interior_Icc] using hx.1)
Hi
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a rectangle: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is continuous on a closed
rectangle and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of the corresponding open
rectangle, then its integral over the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 := by
refine (integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f
(fun z => (fderiv ℂ f z).restrictScalars ℝ) z w s hs Hc
(fun x hx => (Hd x hx).hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ) ?_).trans ?_ <;>
simp [← ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem for a rectangle**: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is continuous on a closed
rectangle and is complex differentiable on the corresponding open rectangle, then its integral over
the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f
(Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im))) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable f z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
fun _x hx => Hd.differentiableAt <| (isOpen_Ioo.reProdIm isOpen_Ioo).mem_nhds hx.1
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a rectangle: the integral of a complex differentiable function
over the boundary of a rectangle equals zero. More precisely, if `f` is complex differentiable on a
closed rectangle, then its integral over the boundary of the rectangle equals zero. -/
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(H : DifferentiableOn ℂ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn f z w H.continuousOn <|
H.mono <|
inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
/-- If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on the closed annulus `r ≤ ‖z - c‖ ≤ R`, `0 < r ≤ R`,
and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior,
then the integrals of `f z / (z - c)` (formally, `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z`)
over the circles `‖z - c‖ = r` and `‖z - c‖ = R` are equal to each other. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ}
{r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z := by
/- We apply the previous lemma to `fun z ↦ f (c + exp z)` on the rectangle
`[log r, log R] × [0, 2 * π]`. -/
set A := closedBall c R \ ball c r
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ a, Real.exp a = r := ⟨Real.log r, Real.exp_log h0⟩
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, Real.exp b = R := ⟨Real.log R, Real.exp_log (h0.trans_le hle)⟩
rw [Real.exp_le_exp] at hle
-- Unfold definition of `circleIntegral` and cancel some terms.
suffices
(∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp b) θ)) =
∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp a) θ) by
simpa only [circleIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left, ofReal_exp, ← exp_add, smul_smul, ←
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (circleMap_ne_center (Real.exp_pos _).ne'),
circleMap_sub_center, deriv_circleMap]
set R := [[a, b]] ×ℂ [[0, 2 * π]]
set g : ℂ → ℂ := (c + exp ·)
have hdg : Differentiable ℂ g := differentiable_exp.const_add _
replace hs : (g ⁻¹' s).Countable := (hs.preimage (add_right_injective c)).preimage_cexp
have h_maps : MapsTo g R A := by
rintro z ⟨h, -⟩; simpa [g, A, dist_eq, norm_exp, hle] using h.symm
replace hc : ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) R := hc.comp hdg.continuous.continuousOn h_maps
replace hd : ∀ z ∈ Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ×ℂ Ioo (min 0 (2 * π)) (max 0 (2 * π)) \ g ⁻¹' s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ (f ∘ g) z := by
refine fun z hz => (hd (g z) ⟨?_, hz.2⟩).comp z (hdg _)
simpa [g, dist_eq, norm_exp, hle, and_comm] using hz.1.1
simpa [g, circleMap, exp_periodic _, sub_eq_zero, ← exp_add] using
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable _ ⟨a, 0⟩ ⟨b, 2 * π⟩ _ hs hc hd
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for an annulus. If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on the closed annulus
`r ≤ ‖z - c‖ ≤ R`, `0 < r ≤ R`, and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of
its interior, then the integrals of `f` over the circles `‖z - c‖ = r` and `‖z - c‖ = R` are equal
to each other. -/
theorem circleIntegral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ} {r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r)
(hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z :=
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable h0 hle hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z := circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Cauchy integral formula** for the value at the center of a disc. If `f` is continuous on a
punctured closed disc of radius `R`, is differentiable at all but countably many points of the
interior of this disc, and has a limit `y` at the center of the disc, then the integral
$\oint_{‖z-c‖=R} \frac{f(z)}{z-c}\,dz$ is equal to `2πiy`. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto {c : ℂ}
{R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R) {f : ℂ → E} {y : E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ {c}))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ {c}) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) (hy : Tendsto f (𝓝[{c}ᶜ] c) (𝓝 y)) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun ε ε0 => ?_
obtain ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ z ∈ closedBall c δ \ {c}, dist (f z) y < ε / (2 * π) :=
((nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closedBall _).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).1 hy _
(div_pos ε0 Real.two_pi_pos)
obtain ⟨r, hr0, hrδ, hrR⟩ : ∃ r, 0 < r ∧ r ≤ δ ∧ r ≤ R :=
⟨min δ R, lt_min δ0 h0, min_le_left _ _, min_le_right _ _⟩
have hsub : closedBall c R \ ball c r ⊆ closedBall c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_ball_self hr0)
have hsub' : ball c R \ closedBall c r ⊆ ball c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_closedBall_self hr0.le)
have hzne : ∀ z ∈ sphere c r, z ≠ c := fun z hz =>
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz fun h => hr0.ne' <| dist_self c ▸ Eq.symm h
/- The integral `∮ z in C(c, r), f z / (z - c)` does not depend on `0 < r ≤ R` and tends to
`2πIy` as `r → 0`. -/
calc
‖(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - (2 * ↑π * I) • y‖ =
‖(∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • y‖ := by
congr 2
· exact circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable hr0
hrR hs (hc.mono hsub) fun z hz => hd z ⟨hsub' hz.1, hz.2⟩
· simp [hr0.ne']
_ = ‖∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (f z - y)‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub]
have hc' : ContinuousOn (fun z => (z - c)⁻¹) (sphere c r) :=
(continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ fun z hz => sub_ne_zero.2 <| hzne _ hz
rw [circleIntegral.integral_sub] <;> refine (hc'.smul ?_).circleIntegrable hr0.le
· exact hc.mono <| subset_inter
(sphere_subset_closedBall.trans <| closedBall_subset_closedBall hrR) hzne
· exact continuousOn_const
_ ≤ 2 * π * r * (r⁻¹ * (ε / (2 * π))) := by
refine circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hr0.le fun z hz => ?_
specialize hzne z hz
rw [mem_sphere, dist_eq_norm] at hz
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, hz, ← dist_eq_norm]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hδ _ ⟨?_, hzne⟩).le (inv_nonneg.2 hr0.le)
rwa [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, hz]
_ = ε := by field_simp [hr0.ne', Real.two_pi_pos.ne']; ac_rfl
/-- **Cauchy integral formula** for the value at the center of a disc. If `f : ℂ → E` is continuous
on a closed disc of radius `R` and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its
interior, then the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=R} \frac{f(z)}{z-c}\,dz$ is equal to `2πiy`. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R)
{f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f c :=
circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto h0 hs
(hc.mono diff_subset) (fun z hz => hd z ⟨hz.1.1, hz.2⟩)
(hc.continuousAt <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ h0).continuousWithinAt
omit [CompleteSpace E] in
/-- **Cauchy-Goursat theorem** for a disk: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disk
`{z | ‖z - c‖ ≤ R}` and is complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior,
then the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=R}f(z)\,dz$ equals zero. -/
theorem circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E}
{c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) : (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = 0 := by
wlog hE : CompleteSpace E generalizing
· simp [circleIntegral, intervalIntegral, integral, hE]
rcases h0.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h0); · apply circleIntegral.integral_radius_zero
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = (2 * ↑π * I : ℂ) • (c - c) • f c :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable h0 hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = 0 := by rw [sub_self, zero_smul, smul_zero]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for
`Complex.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable`. This lemma assumes
`w ∉ s` while the main lemma drops this assumption. -/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ}
{f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R \ s)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R)) (hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f w := by
have hR : 0 < R := dist_nonneg.trans_lt hw.1
set F : ℂ → E := dslope f w
have hws : (insert w s).Countable := hs.insert w
have hcF : ContinuousOn F (closedBall c R) :=
(continuousOn_dslope <| closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem hw.1).2 ⟨hc, hd _ hw⟩
have hdF : ∀ z ∈ ball (c : ℂ) R \ insert w s, DifferentiableAt ℂ F z := fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_dslope_of_ne (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem (mem_insert _ _) hz.2).symm).2
(hd _ (diff_subset_diff_right (subset_insert _ _) hz))
have HI := circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable hR.le hws hcF hdF
have hne : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, z ≠ w := fun z hz => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz (ne_of_lt hw.1)
have hFeq : EqOn F (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹ • f z - (z - w)⁻¹ • f w) (sphere c R) := fun z hz ↦
calc
F z = (z - w)⁻¹ • (f z - f w) := update_of_ne (hne z hz) ..
_ = (z - w)⁻¹ • f z - (z - w)⁻¹ • f w := smul_sub _ _ _
have hc' : ContinuousOn (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹) (sphere c R) :=
(continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ fun z hz => sub_ne_zero.2 <| hne z hz
rw [← circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball hw.1, ← circleIntegral.integral_smul_const, ←
sub_eq_zero, ← circleIntegral.integral_sub, ← circleIntegral.integral_congr hR.le hFeq, HI]
exacts [(hc'.smul (hc.mono sphere_subset_closedBall)).circleIntegrable hR.le,
(hc'.smul continuousOn_const).circleIntegrable hR.le]
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior, then for any `w` in this
interior we have $\frac{1}{2πi}\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=f(w)$.
-/
theorem two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ}
{c w : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R)) (hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
((2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) = f w := by
have hR : 0 < R := dist_nonneg.trans_lt hw
suffices w ∈ closure (ball c R \ s) by
lift R to ℝ≥0 using hR.le
have A : ContinuousAt (fun w => (2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z) w := by
| have := hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral
((hc.mono sphere_subset_closedBall).circleIntegrable R.coe_nonneg) hR
refine this.continuousOn.continuousAt (EMetric.isOpen_ball.mem_nhds ?_)
rwa [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal]
have B : ContinuousAt f w := hc.continuousAt (closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem hw)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq A B ((mem_closure_iff_frequently.1 this).mono ?_)
intro z hz
rw [circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_aux hs hz hc hd,
inv_smul_smul₀]
simp [Real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
refine mem_closure_iff_nhds.2 fun t ht => ?_
-- TODO: generalize to any vector space over `ℝ`
set g : ℝ → ℂ := fun x => w + ofReal x
have : Tendsto g (𝓝 0) (𝓝 w) :=
(continuous_const.add continuous_ofReal).tendsto' 0 w (add_zero _)
rcases mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.1 (this <| inter_mem ht <| isOpen_ball.mem_nhds hw) with
⟨l, u, hlu₀, hlu_sub⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : (Ioo l u \ g ⁻¹' s).Nonempty := by
refine diff_nonempty.2 fun hsub => ?_
have : (Ioo l u).Countable :=
(hs.preimage ((add_right_injective w).comp ofReal_injective)).mono hsub
rw [← Cardinal.le_aleph0_iff_set_countable, Cardinal.mk_Ioo_real (hlu₀.1.trans hlu₀.2)] at this
exact this.not_lt Cardinal.aleph0_lt_continuum
exact ⟨g x, (hlu_sub hx.1).1, (hlu_sub hx.1).2, hx.2⟩
/-- **Cauchy integral formula**: if `f : ℂ → E` is continuous on a closed disc of radius `R` and is
complex differentiable at all but countably many points of its interior, then for any `w` in this
interior we have $\oint_{|z-c|=R}(z-w)^{-1}f(z)\,dz=2πif(w)$.
-/
theorem circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} {c w : ℂ} {f : ℂ → E}
{s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hw : w ∈ ball c R) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ x ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/CauchyIntegral.lean | 457 | 488 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Combinators
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.CasesM
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Core
/-!
Extends the theory on functors, applicatives and monads.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α β γ : Type u}
section Functor
attribute [functor_norm] Functor.map_map
end Functor
section Applicative
variable {F : Type u → Type v} [Applicative F]
/-- A generalization of `List.zipWith` which combines list elements with an `Applicative`. -/
def zipWithM {α₁ α₂ φ : Type u} (f : α₁ → α₂ → F φ) : ∀ (_ : List α₁) (_ : List α₂), F (List φ)
| x :: xs, y :: ys => (· :: ·) <$> f x y <*> zipWithM f xs ys
| _, _ => pure []
/-- Like `zipWithM` but evaluates the result as it traverses the lists using `*>`. -/
def zipWithM' (f : α → β → F γ) : List α → List β → F PUnit
| x :: xs, y :: ys => f x y *> zipWithM' f xs ys
| [], _ => pure PUnit.unit
| _, [] => pure PUnit.unit
variable [LawfulApplicative F]
@[simp]
theorem pure_id'_seq (x : F α) : (pure fun x => x) <*> x = x :=
pure_id_seq x
@[functor_norm]
theorem seq_map_assoc (x : F (α → β)) (f : γ → α) (y : F γ) :
x <*> f <$> y = (· ∘ f) <$> x <*> y := by
simp only [← pure_seq]
simp only [seq_assoc, Function.comp, seq_pure, ← comp_map]
simp [pure_seq]
rfl
@[functor_norm]
theorem map_seq (f : β → γ) (x : F (α → β)) (y : F α) :
f <$> (x <*> y) = (f ∘ ·) <$> x <*> y := by
simp only [← pure_seq]; simp [seq_assoc]
end Applicative
section Monad
variable {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
theorem seq_bind_eq (x : m α) {g : β → m γ} {f : α → β} :
f <$> x >>= g = x >>= g ∘ f :=
show bind (f <$> x) g = bind x (g ∘ f) by
rw [← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]
simp [pure_bind, Function.comp_def]
-- order of implicits and `Seq.seq` has a lazily evaluated second argument using `Unit`
@[functor_norm]
theorem fish_pure {α β} (f : α → m β) : f >=> pure = f := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [(· >=> ·), functor_norm]
@[functor_norm]
theorem fish_pipe {α β} (f : α → m β) : pure >=> f = f := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [(· >=> ·), functor_norm]
-- note: in Lean 3 `>=>` is left-associative, but in Lean 4 it is right-associative.
@[functor_norm]
theorem fish_assoc {α β γ φ} (f : α → m β) (g : β → m γ) (h : γ → m φ) :
(f >=> g) >=> h = f >=> g >=> h := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [(· >=> ·), functor_norm]
variable {β' γ' : Type v}
variable {m' : Type v → Type w} [Monad m']
/-- Takes a value `β` and `List α` and accumulates pairs according to a monadic function `f`.
Accumulation occurs from the right (i.e., starting from the tail of the list). -/
def List.mapAccumRM (f : α → β' → m' (β' × γ')) : β' → List α → m' (β' × List γ')
| a, [] => pure (a, [])
| a, x :: xs => do
let (a', ys) ← List.mapAccumRM f a xs
let (a'', y) ← f x a'
pure (a'', y :: ys)
/-- Takes a value `β` and `List α` and accumulates pairs according to a monadic function `f`.
Accumulation occurs from the left (i.e., starting from the head of the list). -/
def List.mapAccumLM (f : β' → α → m' (β' × γ')) : β' → List α → m' (β' × List γ')
| a, [] => pure (a, [])
| a, x :: xs => do
let (a', y) ← f a x
let (a'', ys) ← List.mapAccumLM f a' xs
pure (a'', y :: ys)
end Monad
section
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
theorem joinM_map_map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (a : m (m α)) :
joinM (Functor.map f <$> a) = f <$> joinM a := by
simp only [joinM, (· ∘ ·), id, ← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, map_bind, pure_bind]
theorem joinM_map_joinM {α : Type u} (a : m (m (m α))) : joinM (joinM <$> a) = joinM (joinM a) := by
simp only [joinM, (· ∘ ·), id, map_bind, ← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
@[simp]
theorem joinM_map_pure {α : Type u} (a : m α) : joinM (pure <$> a) = a := by
simp only [joinM, (· ∘ ·), id, map_bind, ← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind, bind_pure]
@[simp]
theorem joinM_pure {α : Type u} (a : m α) : joinM (pure a) = a :=
LawfulMonad.pure_bind a id
end
section Alternative
variable {F : Type → Type v} [Alternative F]
-- [todo] add notation for `Functor.mapConst` and port `Functor.mapConstRev`
/-- Returns `pure true` if the computation succeeds and `pure false` otherwise. -/
def succeeds {α} (x : F α) : F Bool :=
Functor.mapConst true x <|> pure false
/-- Attempts to perform the computation, but fails silently if it doesn't succeed. -/
def tryM {α} (x : F α) : F Unit :=
Functor.mapConst () x <|> pure ()
/-- Attempts to perform the computation, and returns `none` if it doesn't succeed. -/
def try? {α} (x : F α) : F (Option α) :=
some <$> x <|> pure none
@[simp]
theorem guard_true {h : Decidable True} : @guard F _ True h = pure () := by simp [guard, if_pos]
@[simp]
theorem guard_false {h : Decidable False} : @guard F _ False h = failure := by
simp [guard, if_neg not_false]
end Alternative
namespace Sum
variable {e : Type v}
/-- The monadic `bind` operation for `Sum`. -/
protected def bind {α β} : e ⊕ α → (α → e ⊕ β) → e ⊕ β
| inl x, _ => inl x
| inr x, f => f x
-- incorrectly marked as a bad translation by mathport, so we do not mark with `ₓ`.
instance : Monad (Sum.{v, u} e) where
pure := @Sum.inr e
bind := @Sum.bind e
instance : LawfulFunctor (Sum.{v, u} e) := by
constructor <;> intros <;> (try casesm Sum _ _) <;> rfl
instance : LawfulMonad (Sum.{v, u} e) where
seqRight_eq := by
intros
casesm Sum _ _ <;> casesm Sum _ _ <;> rfl
seqLeft_eq := by
intros
casesm Sum _ _ <;> rfl
pure_seq := by
intros
rfl
bind_assoc := by
intros
casesm Sum _ _ <;> rfl
pure_bind := by
intros
rfl
bind_pure_comp := by
intros
casesm Sum _ _ <;> rfl
bind_map := by
intros
casesm Sum _ _ <;> rfl
end Sum
/-- A `CommApplicative` functor `m` is a (lawful) applicative functor which behaves identically on
`α × β` and `β × α`, so computations can occur in either order. -/
class CommApplicative (m : Type u → Type v) [Applicative m] : Prop extends LawfulApplicative m where
/-- Computations performed first on `a : α` and then on `b : β` are equal to those performed in
the reverse order. -/
commutative_prod : ∀ {α β} (a : m α) (b : m β),
Prod.mk <$> a <*> b = (fun (b : β) a => (a, b)) <$> b <*> a
open Functor
theorem CommApplicative.commutative_map {m : Type u → Type v} [h : Applicative m]
[CommApplicative m] {α β γ} (a : m α) (b : m β) {f : α → β → γ} :
f <$> a <*> b = flip f <$> b <*> a :=
calc
f <$> a <*> b = (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) <$> (Prod.mk <$> a <*> b) := by
simp only [map_seq, map_map, Function.comp_def]
_ = (fun b a => f a b) <$> b <*> a := by
rw [@CommApplicative.commutative_prod m h]
simp [seq_map_assoc, map_seq, seq_assoc, seq_pure, map_map, (· ∘ ·)]
rfl
| Mathlib/Control/Basic.lean | 249 | 257 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Peter Pfaffelhuber
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.SetSemiring
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
/-!
# Additive Contents
An additive content `m` on a set of sets `C` is a set function with value 0 at the empty set which
is finitely additive on `C`. That means that for any finset `I` of pairwise disjoint sets in `C`
such that `⋃₀ I ∈ C`, `m (⋃₀ I) = ∑ s ∈ I, m s`.
Mathlib also has a definition of contents over compact sets: see `MeasureTheory.Content`.
A `Content` is in particular an `AddContent` on the set of compact sets.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.AddContent C`: additive contents over the set of sets `C`.
* `MeasureTheory.AddContent.IsSigmaSubadditive`: an `AddContent` is σ-subadditive if
`m (⋃ i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i)` for any sequence of sets `f` in `C` such that `⋃ i, f i ∈ C`.
## Main statements
Let `m` be an `AddContent C`. If `C` is a set semi-ring (`IsSetSemiring C`) we have the properties
* `MeasureTheory.sum_addContent_le_of_subset`: if `I` is a finset of pairwise disjoint sets in `C`
and `⋃₀ I ⊆ t` for `t ∈ C`, then `∑ s ∈ I, m s ≤ m t`.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_mono`: if `s ⊆ t` for two sets in `C`, then `m s ≤ m t`.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_sUnion_le_sum`: an `AddContent C` on a `SetSemiring C` is
sub-additive.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_iUnion_eq_tsum_of_disjoint_of_addContent_iUnion_le`: if an
`AddContent` is σ-subadditive on a semi-ring of sets, then it is σ-additive.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_union'`: if `s, t ∈ C` are disjoint and `s ∪ t ∈ C`,
then `m (s ∪ t) = m s + m t`.
If `C` is a set ring (`IsSetRing`), then `addContent_union` gives the same conclusion without the
hypothesis `s ∪ t ∈ C` (since it is a consequence of `IsSetRing C`).
If `C` is a set ring (`MeasureTheory.IsSetRing C`), we have
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_union_le`: for `s, t ∈ C`, `m (s ∪ t) ≤ m s + m t`
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_le_diff`: for `s, t ∈ C`, `m s - m t ≤ m (s \ t)`
* `IsSetRing.addContent_of_union`: a function on a ring of sets which is additive on pairs of
disjoint sets defines an additive content
* `addContent_iUnion_eq_sum_of_tendsto_zero`: if an additive content is continuous at `∅`, then
its value on a countable disjoint union is the sum of the values
* `MeasureTheory.isSigmaSubadditive_of_addContent_iUnion_eq_tsum`: if an `AddContent` is
σ-additive on a set ring, then it is σ-subadditive.
-/
open Set Finset Function Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology Function
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {C : Set (Set α)} {s t : Set α} {I : Finset (Set α)}
/-- An additive content is a set function with value 0 at the empty set which is finitely additive
on a given set of sets. -/
structure AddContent (C : Set (Set α)) where
/-- The value of the content on a set. -/
toFun : Set α → ℝ≥0∞
empty' : toFun ∅ = 0
sUnion' (I : Finset (Set α)) (_h_ss : ↑I ⊆ C)
(_h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id) (_h_mem : ⋃₀ ↑I ∈ C) :
toFun (⋃₀ I) = ∑ u ∈ I, toFun u
instance : Inhabited (AddContent C) :=
⟨{toFun := fun _ => 0
empty' := by simp
sUnion' := by simp }⟩
instance : DFunLike (AddContent C) (Set α) (fun _ ↦ ℝ≥0∞) where
coe m s := m.toFun s
coe_injective' m m' _ := by
cases m
cases m'
congr
variable {m m' : AddContent C}
@[ext] protected lemma AddContent.ext (h : ∀ s, m s = m' s) : m = m' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
|
@[simp] lemma addContent_empty : m ∅ = 0 := m.empty'
lemma addContent_sUnion (h_ss : ↑I ⊆ C)
(h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id) (h_mem : ⋃₀ ↑I ∈ C) :
m (⋃₀ I) = ∑ u ∈ I, m u :=
m.sUnion' I h_ss h_dis h_mem
lemma addContent_union' (hs : s ∈ C) (ht : t ∈ C) (hst : s ∪ t ∈ C) (h_dis : Disjoint s t) :
m (s ∪ t) = m s + m t := by
by_cases hs_empty : s = ∅
· simp only [hs_empty, Set.empty_union, addContent_empty, zero_add]
classical
have h := addContent_sUnion (m := m) (I := {s, t}) ?_ ?_ ?_
rotate_left
· simp only [coe_pair, Set.insert_subset_iff, hs, ht, Set.singleton_subset_iff, and_self_iff]
· simp only [coe_pair, Set.pairwiseDisjoint_insert, pairwiseDisjoint_singleton,
mem_singleton_iff, Ne, id, forall_eq, true_and]
exact fun _ => h_dis
· simp only [coe_pair, sUnion_insert, sUnion_singleton]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AddContent.lean | 88 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Alex Keizer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Snoc
/-!
This file establishes a set of normalization lemmas for `map`/`mapAccumr` operations on vectors
-/
variable {α β γ ζ σ σ₁ σ₂ φ : Type*} {n : ℕ} {s : σ} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
namespace List
namespace Vector
/-!
## Fold nested `mapAccumr`s into one
-/
section Fold
section Unary
variable (xs : Vector α n) (f₁ : β → σ₁ → σ₁ × γ) (f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × β)
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_mapAccumr :
mapAccumr f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd s₁
= let m := (mapAccumr (fun x s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_map {s : σ₁} (f₂ : α → β) :
(mapAccumr f₁ (map f₂ xs) s) = (mapAccumr (fun x s => f₁ (f₂ x) s) xs s) := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_mapAccumr {s : σ₂} (f₁ : β → γ) :
(map f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s).snd) = (mapAccumr (fun x s =>
let r := (f₂ x s); (r.fst, f₁ r.snd)
) xs s).snd := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_map (f₁ : β → γ) (f₂ : α → β) :
map f₁ (map f₂ xs) = map (fun x => f₁ <| f₂ x) xs := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f₁ : β → γ) (f₂ : (a : α) → p a → β) (H : ∀ x ∈ xs.toList, p x):
map f₁ (pmap f₂ xs H) = pmap (fun x hx => f₁ <| f₂ x hx) xs H := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (f₁ : (b : β) → p b → γ) (f₂ : α → β)
(H : ∀ x ∈ (xs.map f₂).toList, p x):
pmap f₁ (map f₂ xs) H = pmap (fun x hx => f₁ (f₂ x) hx) xs (by simpa using H) := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
end Unary
section Binary
variable (xs : Vector α n) (ys : Vector β n)
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr_left (f₁ : γ → β → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd ys s₁)
= let m := (mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd y s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map₂_map_left (f₁ : γ → β → ζ) (f₂ : α → γ) :
map₂ f₁ (map f₂ xs) ys = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ (f₂ x) y) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr_right (f₁ : α → γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs (mapAccumr f₂ ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := (mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ y s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ x r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map₂_map_right (f₁ : α → γ → ζ) (f₂ : β → γ) :
map₂ f₁ xs (map f₂ ys) = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ x (f₂ y)) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_mapAccumr₂ (f₁ : γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr f₁ (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂)
| (m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_map₂ (f₁ : γ → ζ) (f₂ : α → β → γ) :
map f₁ (map₂ f₂ xs ys) = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ <| f₂ x y) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr₂_left_left (f₁ : γ → α → σ₁ → σ₁ × φ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/MapLemmas.lean | 108 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (monomial 0) add fun n a _h =>
by rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; exact monomial _ _
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by
| rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 951 | 953 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maximal
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Ideals over a ring
This file contains an assortment of definitions and results for `Ideal R`,
the type of (left) ideals over a ring `R`.
Note that over commutative rings, left ideals and two-sided ideals are equivalent.
## Implementation notes
`Ideal R` is implemented using `Submodule R R`, where `•` is interpreted as `*`.
## TODO
Support right ideals, and two-sided ideals over non-commutative rings.
-/
variable {ι α β F : Type*}
open Set Function
open Pointwise
section Semiring
namespace Ideal
variable {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, Semiring (α i)] (I : Π i, Ideal (α i))
section Pi
/-- `Πᵢ Iᵢ` as an ideal of `Πᵢ Rᵢ`. -/
def pi : Ideal (Π i, α i) where
carrier := { x | ∀ i, x i ∈ I i }
zero_mem' i := (I i).zero_mem
add_mem' ha hb i := (I i).add_mem (ha i) (hb i)
smul_mem' a _b hb i := (I i).mul_mem_left (a i) (hb i)
theorem mem_pi (x : Π i, α i) : x ∈ pi I ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ I i :=
Iff.rfl
instance (priority := low) [∀ i, (I i).IsTwoSided] : (pi I).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun _b hb i ↦ mul_mem_right _ _ (hb i)⟩
end Pi
section Commute
variable {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (I : Ideal α) {a b : α}
theorem add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute {m n k : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hk : m + n ≤ k + 1)
(hab : Commute a b) :
(a + b) ^ k ∈ I := by
simp_rw [hab.add_pow, ← Nat.cast_comm]
apply I.sum_mem
intro c _
apply mul_mem_left
by_cases h : m ≤ c
· rw [hab.pow_pow]
exact I.mul_mem_left _ (I.pow_mem_of_pow_mem ha h)
· refine I.mul_mem_left _ (I.pow_mem_of_pow_mem hb ?_)
omega
theorem add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem_of_commute {m n : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hab : Commute a b) :
(a + b) ^ (m + n - 1) ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute ha hb (by rw [← Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]) hab
end Commute
end Ideal
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable {a b : α}
-- A separate namespace definition is needed because the variables were historically in a different
-- order.
namespace Ideal
variable [CommSemiring α] (I : Ideal α)
theorem add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le {m n k : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hk : m + n ≤ k + 1) :
(a + b) ^ k ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute ha hb hk (Commute.all ..)
theorem add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem {m n : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) :
(a + b) ^ (m + n - 1) ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem_of_commute ha hb (Commute.all ..)
theorem pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) :
s.sum ^ (Multiset.card s * n + 1) ∈
span ((s.map fun (x : α) ↦ x ^ (n + 1)).toFinset : Set α) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a s hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.toFinset_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Multiset.card_cons, add_pow]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ ?_
intro c _hc
rw [mem_span_insert]
by_cases h : n + 1 ≤ c
· refine ⟨a ^ (c - (n + 1)) * s.sum ^ ((Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1 - c) *
((Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1).choose c, 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, ?_⟩
rw [mul_comm _ (a ^ (n + 1))]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← pow_add, add_zero, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h]
· use 0
simp_rw [zero_mul, zero_add]
refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
replace h : c ≤ n := Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (not_le.mp h)
have : (Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1 - c = Multiset.card s * n + 1 + (n - c) := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul, add_assoc, add_comm n 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h]
rw [this, pow_add]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (s.sum ^ (Multiset.card s * n + 1)), ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_mem_left _ _ hs
theorem sum_pow_mem_span_pow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ (s.card * n + 1) ∈ span ((fun i => f i ^ (n + 1)) '' s) := by
classical
simpa only [Multiset.card_map, Multiset.map_map, comp_apply, Multiset.toFinset_map,
Finset.coe_image, Finset.val_toFinset] using pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow (s.1.map f) n
theorem span_pow_eq_top (s : Set α) (hs : span s = ⊤) (n : ℕ) :
span ((fun (x : α) => x ^ n) '' s) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
rcases n with - | n
· obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· rw [Set.image_empty, hs]
trivial
· exact subset_span ⟨_, hx, pow_zero _⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one, span, Finsupp.mem_span_iff_linearCombination] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
have hf : (f.support.sum fun a => f a * a) = 1 := hf -- Porting note: was `change ... at hf`
have := sum_pow_mem_span_pow f.support (fun a => f a * a) n
rw [hf, one_pow] at this
refine span_le.mpr ?_ this
rintro _ hx
simp_rw [Set.mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x, _, rfl⟩
have : span ({(x : α) ^ (n + 1)} : Set α) ≤ span ((fun x : α => x ^ (n + 1)) '' s) := by
rw [span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact subset_span ⟨x, x.prop, rfl⟩
refine this ?_
rw [mul_pow, mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨f x ^ (n + 1), mul_comm _ _⟩
theorem span_range_pow_eq_top (s : Set α) (hs : span s = ⊤) (n : s → ℕ) :
span (Set.range fun x ↦ x.1 ^ n x) = ⊤ := by
have ⟨t, hts, mem⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_finite_of_mem_span ((eq_top_iff_one _).mp hs)
refine top_unique ((span_pow_eq_top _ ((eq_top_iff_one _).mpr mem) <|
t.attach.sup fun x ↦ n ⟨x, hts x.2⟩).ge.trans <| span_le.mpr ?_)
rintro _ ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Finset.le_sup <| t.mem_attach ⟨x, hxt⟩)]
simp_rw [pow_add]
exact mul_mem_left _ _ (subset_span ⟨_, rfl⟩)
theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Finset ι}
(I : Ideal α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hfi : f i ∈ I) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ∈ I := by
classical
rw [Finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul hi]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hfi
end Ideal
end CommSemiring
section DivisionSemiring
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionSemiring K] (I : Ideal K)
namespace Ideal
variable (K) in
/-- A bijection between (left) ideals of a division ring and `{0, 1}`, sending `⊥` to `0`
and `⊤` to `1`. -/
def equivFinTwo [DecidableEq (Ideal K)] : Ideal K ≃ Fin 2 where
toFun := fun I ↦ if I = ⊥ then 0 else 1
invFun := ![⊥, ⊤]
left_inv := fun I ↦ by rcases eq_bot_or_top I with rfl | rfl <;> simp
right_inv := fun i ↦ by fin_cases i <;> simp
instance : Finite (Ideal K) := let _i := Classical.decEq (Ideal K); ⟨equivFinTwo K⟩
/-- Ideals of a `DivisionSemiring` are a simple order. Thanks to the way abbreviations work,
this automatically gives an `IsSimpleModule K` instance. -/
instance isSimpleOrder : IsSimpleOrder (Ideal K) :=
⟨eq_bot_or_top⟩
end Ideal
end DivisionSemiring
-- TODO: consider moving the lemmas below out of the `Ring` namespace since they are
-- about `CommSemiring`s.
namespace Ring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
theorem exists_not_isUnit_of_not_isField [Nontrivial R] (hf : ¬IsField R) :
∃ (x : R) (_hx : x ≠ (0 : R)), ¬IsUnit x := by
have : ¬_ := fun h => hf ⟨exists_pair_ne R, mul_comm, h⟩
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_exists_inv]
push_neg at this ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩ := this
exact ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩
theorem not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top [Nontrivial R] :
¬IsField R ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, ⊥ < I ∧ I < ⊤ := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨x, nz, nu⟩ := exists_not_isUnit_of_not_isField h
use Ideal.span {x}
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
exact ⟨mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp nz, mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.mp nu⟩
· rintro ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩ hf
obtain ⟨x, mem, ne_zero⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt bot_lt
rw [Submodule.mem_bot] at ne_zero
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf.mul_inv_cancel ne_zero
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, ← hy] at lt_top
exact lt_top (I.mul_mem_right _ mem)
theorem not_isField_iff_exists_prime [Nontrivial R] :
¬IsField R ↔ ∃ p : Ideal R, p ≠ ⊥ ∧ p.IsPrime :=
not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.trans
⟨fun ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hp, le_p⟩ := I.exists_le_maximal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp lt_top)
⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mp (lt_of_lt_of_le bot_lt le_p), hp.isPrime⟩,
fun ⟨p, ne_bot, Prime⟩ => ⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr Prime.1⟩⟩
/-- Also see `Ideal.isSimpleOrder` for the forward direction as an instance when `R` is a
division (semi)ring.
This result actually holds for all division semirings, but we lack the predicate to state it. -/
theorem isField_iff_isSimpleOrder_ideal : IsField R ↔ IsSimpleOrder (Ideal R) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· exact
⟨fun h => (not_isField_of_subsingleton _ h).elim, fun h =>
(false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton <| Ideal R).elim⟩
rw [← not_iff_not, Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top, ← not_iff_not]
push_neg
simp_rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, ← or_iff_not_imp_left, not_ne_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.2⟩
/-- When a ring is not a field, the maximal ideals are nontrivial. -/
theorem ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField [Nontrivial R] {M : Ideal R} (max : M.IsMaximal)
(not_field : ¬IsField R) : M ≠ ⊥ := by
rintro h
rw [h] at max
rcases max with ⟨⟨_h1, h2⟩⟩
obtain ⟨I, hIbot, hItop⟩ := not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.mp not_field
exact ne_of_lt hItop (h2 I hIbot)
end Ring
namespace Ideal
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R]
theorem bot_lt_of_maximal (M : Ideal R) [hm : M.IsMaximal] (non_field : ¬IsField R) : ⊥ < M := by
rcases Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.1 non_field with ⟨I, Ibot, Itop⟩
constructor; · simp
intro mle
apply lt_irrefl (⊤ : Ideal R)
have : M = ⊥ := eq_bot_iff.mpr mle
rw [← this] at Ibot
rwa [hm.1.2 I Ibot] at Itop
end Ideal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Basic.lean | 359 | 363 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Hasse derivative of polynomials
The `k`th Hasse derivative of a polynomial `∑ a_i X^i` is `∑ (i.choose k) a_i X^(i-k)`.
It is a variant of the usual derivative, and satisfies `k! * (hasseDeriv k f) = derivative^[k] f`.
The main benefit is that is gives an atomic way of talking about expressions such as
`(derivative^[k] f).eval r / k!`, that occur in Taylor expansions, for example.
## Main declarations
In the following, we write `D k` for the `k`-th Hasse derivative `hasse_deriv k`.
* `Polynomial.hasseDeriv`: the `k`-th Hasse derivative of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.hasseDeriv_zero`: the `0`th Hasse derivative is the identity
* `Polynomial.hasseDeriv_one`: the `1`st Hasse derivative is the usual derivative
* `Polynomial.factorial_smul_hasseDeriv`: the identity `k! • (D k f) = derivative^[k] f`
* `Polynomial.hasseDeriv_comp`: the identity `(D k).comp (D l) = (k+l).choose k • D (k+l)`
* `Polynomial.hasseDeriv_mul`:
the "Leibniz rule" `D k (f * g) = ∑ ij ∈ antidiagonal k, D ij.1 f * D ij.2 g`
For the identity principle, see `Polynomial.eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero`
in `Data/Polynomial/Taylor.lean`.
## Reference
https://math.fontein.de/2009/08/12/the-hasse-derivative/
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
open Nat Polynomial
open Function
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (k : ℕ) (f : R[X])
/-- The `k`th Hasse derivative of a polynomial `∑ a_i X^i` is `∑ (i.choose k) a_i X^(i-k)`.
It satisfies `k! * (hasse_deriv k f) = derivative^[k] f`. -/
def hasseDeriv (k : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] :=
lsum fun i => monomial (i - k) ∘ₗ DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R R (i.choose k)
theorem hasseDeriv_apply :
hasseDeriv k f = f.sum fun i r => monomial (i - k) (↑(i.choose k) * r) := by
dsimp [hasseDeriv]
congr; ext; congr
apply nsmul_eq_mul
theorem hasseDeriv_coeff (n : ℕ) :
(hasseDeriv k f).coeff n = (n + k).choose k * f.coeff (n + k) := by
rw [hasseDeriv_apply, coeff_sum, sum_def, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + k), coeff_monomial]
· simp only [if_true, add_tsub_cancel_right, eq_self_iff_true]
· intro i _hi hink
rw [coeff_monomial]
by_cases hik : i < k
· simp only [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hik, ite_self, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
· push_neg at hik
rw [if_neg]
contrapose! hink
exact (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hik).mp hink
· intro h
simp only [not_mem_support_iff.mp h, monomial_zero_right, mul_zero, coeff_zero]
theorem hasseDeriv_zero' : hasseDeriv 0 f = f := by
simp only [hasseDeriv_apply, tsub_zero, Nat.choose_zero_right, Nat.cast_one, one_mul,
sum_monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_zero : @hasseDeriv R _ 0 = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| hasseDeriv_zero'
theorem hasseDeriv_eq_zero_of_lt_natDegree (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.natDegree < n) :
hasseDeriv n p = 0 := by
rw [hasseDeriv_apply, sum_def]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_
simp [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt ((le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hx).trans_lt h)]
theorem hasseDeriv_one' : hasseDeriv 1 f = derivative f := by
simp only [hasseDeriv_apply, derivative_apply, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, Nat.choose_one_right,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq]
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_one : @hasseDeriv R _ 1 = derivative :=
LinearMap.ext <| hasseDeriv_one'
@[simp]
theorem hasseDeriv_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
hasseDeriv k (monomial n r) = monomial (n - k) (↑(n.choose k) * r) := by
ext i
simp only [hasseDeriv_coeff, coeff_monomial]
by_cases hnik : n = i + k
· rw [if_pos hnik, if_pos, ← hnik]
apply tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev
rwa [add_comm]
· rw [if_neg hnik, mul_zero]
by_cases hkn : k ≤ n
· rw [← tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hkn] at hnik
rw [if_neg hnik]
· push_neg at hkn
rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hkn, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
theorem hasseDeriv_C (r : R) (hk : 0 < k) : hasseDeriv k (C r) = 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_left, hasseDeriv_monomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, Nat.cast_zero,
zero_mul, monomial_zero_right]
theorem hasseDeriv_apply_one (hk : 0 < k) : hasseDeriv k (1 : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, hasseDeriv_C k _ hk]
theorem hasseDeriv_X (hk : 1 < k) : hasseDeriv k (X : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, hasseDeriv_monomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, Nat.cast_zero,
zero_mul, monomial_zero_right]
theorem factorial_smul_hasseDeriv : ⇑(k ! • @hasseDeriv R _ k) = (@derivative R _)^[k] := by
induction' k with k ih
· rw [hasseDeriv_zero, factorial_zero, iterate_zero, one_smul, LinearMap.id_coe]
ext f n : 2
rw [iterate_succ_apply', ← ih]
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, coeff_smul, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, coeff_derivative,
hasseDeriv_coeff, ← @choose_symm_add _ k]
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, factorial_succ, mul_assoc, succ_eq_add_one, ← add_assoc,
add_right_comm n 1 k, ← cast_succ]
rw [← (cast_commute (n + 1) (f.coeff (n + k + 1))).eq]
simp only [← mul_assoc]
norm_cast
congr 2
rw [mul_comm (k+1) _, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
congr 1
| have : n + k + 1 = n + (k + 1) := by apply add_assoc
rw [← choose_symm_of_eq_add this, choose_succ_right_eq, mul_comm]
congr
rw [add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem hasseDeriv_comp (k l : ℕ) :
(@hasseDeriv R _ k).comp (hasseDeriv l) = (k + l).choose k • hasseDeriv (k + l) := by
ext i : 2
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, smul_monomial, hasseDeriv_apply,
mul_one, monomial_eq_zero_iff, sum_monomial_index, mul_zero, ←
tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm l k]
rw_mod_cast [nsmul_eq_mul]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul]
congr 2
by_cases hikl : i < k + l
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hikl, mul_zero]
by_cases hil : i < l
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hil, mul_zero]
· push_neg at hil
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/HasseDeriv.lean | 143 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Function TopologicalSpace Topology Set UniformSpace Uniformity
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
theorem cauchy_map_iff' {l : Filter β} [hl : NeBot l] {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans <| and_iff_right hl
theorem Cauchy.mono {f g : Filter α} [hg : NeBot g] (h_c : Cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (Filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
theorem Cauchy.mono' {f g : Filter α} (h_c : Cauchy f) (_ : NeBot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
theorem cauchy_nhds {a : α} : Cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_neBot, nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)⟩
theorem cauchy_pure {a : α} : Cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchy_map {l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma Cauchy.mono_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} (huv : u ≤ v)
(hF : Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F) : Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F :=
⟨hF.1, hF.2.trans huv⟩
lemma cauchy_inf_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u ⊓ v) F ↔
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F ∧ Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [inf_uniformity (u := u), le_inf_iff, and_and_left]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff, forall_and, forall_const]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace' {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
simp_rw [cauchy_iff_le (uniformSpace := _), iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff]
lemma cauchy_comap_uniformSpace {u : UniformSpace β} {α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := comap f u) l ↔ Cauchy (map f l) := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap]
rfl
lemma cauchy_prod_iff [UniformSpace β] {F : Filter (α × β)} :
Cauchy F ↔ Cauchy (map Prod.fst F) ∧ Cauchy (map Prod.snd F) := by
simp_rw [instUniformSpaceProd, ← cauchy_comap_uniformSpace, ← cauchy_inf_uniformSpace]
theorem Cauchy.prod [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} (hf : Cauchy f) (hg : Cauchy g) :
Cauchy (f ×ˢ g) := by
have := hf.1; have := hg.1
simpa [cauchy_prod_iff, hf.1] using ⟨hf, hg⟩
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`SequentiallyComplete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : Filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
intro s hs
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩
apply mem_of_superset t_mem
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact fun z hz => hU (prodMk_mem_compRel hxy (ht <| mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) (adhs : ClusterPt x f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s := (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs
use t, t_mem, ht
exact forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem))
theorem le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ClusterPt x f :=
⟨fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.map [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : UniformContinuous m) : Cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc
map m f ×ˢ map m f = map (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := Filter.prod_map_map_eq
_ ≤ Filter.map (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 α) := map_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := hm⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.comap [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) [NeBot (comap m f)] :
Cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc
comap m f ×ˢ comap m f = comap (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := prod_comap_comap_eq
_ ≤ comap (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 β) := comap_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 α := hm⟩
theorem Cauchy.comap' [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : Filter.comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(_ : NeBot (Filter.comap m f)) : Cauchy (Filter.comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def CauchySeq [Preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
Cauchy (atTop.map u)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_uniformity [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) := by
simpa only [Tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using h.right
theorem CauchySeq.nonempty [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : Nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_neBot _ _ <| (map_neBot_iff _).1 hu.1
theorem CauchySeq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V := by
haveI := h.nonempty
have := h.tendsto_uniformity; rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at this
simpa [MapsTo] using atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchySeq [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) : CauchySeq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
theorem cauchySeq_const [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (x : α) : CauchySeq fun _ : β => x :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchySeq
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans <| by simp only [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
theorem CauchySeq.comp_tendsto {γ} [Preorder β] [SemilatticeSup γ] [Nonempty γ] {f : β → α}
(hf : CauchySeq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) : CauchySeq (f ∘ g) :=
⟨inferInstance, le_trans (prod_le_prod.mpr ⟨Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg, Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg⟩) hf.2⟩
theorem CauchySeq.comp_injective [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] [Nonempty β] {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f : β → ℕ} (hf : Injective f) : CauchySeq (u ∘ f) :=
hu.comp_tendsto <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hf.tendsto_cofinite.mono_left atTop_le_cofinite
theorem Function.Bijective.cauchySeq_comp_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Bijective f) (u : ℕ → α) :
CauchySeq (u ∘ f) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp_injective hf.injective⟩
lift f to ℕ ≃ ℕ using hf
simpa only [Function.comp_def, f.apply_symm_apply] using H.comp_injective f.symm.injective
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto] at hu
exact ((hu.comp <| hf.prod_atTop hg).comp tendsto_atTop_diagonal).subseq_mem hV
-- todo: generalize this and other lemmas to a nonempty semilattice
theorem cauchySeq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, k ∈ Prod.map u u ⁻¹' V :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto
theorem cauchySeq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V := by
simp only [cauchySeq_iff', Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self', mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
theorem CauchySeq.prodMap {γ δ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq (Prod.map u v) := by
simpa only [CauchySeq, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using hu.prod hv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod_map := CauchySeq.prodMap
theorem CauchySeq.prodMk {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {u : γ → α} {v : γ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq fun x => (u x, v x) :=
haveI := hu.1.of_map
(Cauchy.prod hu hv).mono (tendsto_map.prodMk tendsto_map)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod := CauchySeq.prodMk
theorem CauchySeq.eventually_eventually [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, (u k, u l) ∈ V :=
eventually_atTop_curry <| hu.tendsto_uniformity hV
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_cauchySeq {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) {u : γ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : CauchySeq (f ∘ u) :=
hu.map hf
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V n := by
have : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ k, (u l, u k) ∈ V n := fun n => by
rw [cauchySeq_iff] at hu
rcases hu _ (hV n) with ⟨N, H⟩
exact ⟨N, fun k hk l hl => H _ (le_trans hk hl) _ hk⟩
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : StrictMono φ, hφ : ∀ n, ∀ l ≥ φ n, (u l, u <| φ n) ∈ V n⟩ :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually' this
exact ⟨φ, φ_extr, fun n => hφ _ _ (φ_extr <| Nat.lt_add_one n).le⟩
theorem Filter.Tendsto.subseq_mem_entourage {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
{a : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ (u (φ 0), a) ∈ V 0 ∧
∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V (n + 1) := by
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 (hu (ball_mem_nhds a (symm_le_uniformity <| hV 0))) with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases (hu.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat n)).cauchySeq.subseq_mem fun n => hV (n + 1) with
⟨φ, φ_mono, hφV⟩
exact ⟨fun k => φ k + n, φ_mono.add_const _, hn _ le_add_self, hφV⟩
/-- If a Cauchy sequence has a convergent subsequence, then it converges. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {p : Filter ι} [NeBot p] (hf : Tendsto f p atTop) {a : α}
(ha : Tendsto (u ∘ f) p (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hu (ha.mapClusterPt.of_comp hf)
/-- Any shift of a Cauchy sequence is also a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_shift {u : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : CauchySeq (fun n ↦ u (n + k)) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [cauchySeq_iff] at h ⊢
intro V mV
obtain ⟨N, h⟩ := h V mV
use N + k
intro a ha b hb
convert h (a - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le ha) (b - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le hb) <;> omega
· exact h.comp_tendsto (tendsto_add_atTop_nat k)
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {p : γ → Prop}
{s : γ → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ s i := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, ← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
refine (atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_iff h).trans ?_
simp only [exists_prop, true_and, MapsTo, preimage, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_Ici, and_imp, Prod.map, @forall_swap (_ ≤ _) β]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff' {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → Set (α × α)} (H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, (u n, u N) ∈ s i := by
refine H.cauchySeq_iff.trans ⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· exact (h i hi).imp fun N hN n hn => hN n hn N le_rfl
· rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity (H.mem_of_mem hi) with ⟨t, ht, ht', hts⟩
rcases H.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨j, hj, hjt⟩
refine (h j hj).imp fun N hN m hm n hn => hts ⟨u N, hjt ?_, ht' <| hjt ?_⟩
exacts [hN m hm, hN n hn]
theorem cauchySeq_of_controlled [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (U : β → Set (α × α))
(hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) {f : β → α}
(hf : ∀ ⦃N m n : β⦄, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto.2
(by
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets]
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hU s hs
refine ⟨(N, N), fun mn hmn => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, n⟩ := mn
exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2))
theorem isComplete_iff_clusterPt {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l, Cauchy l → l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l :=
forall₃_congr fun _ hl _ => exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ =>
le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy hl
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ↑l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine ⟨fun h l => h l, fun H => isComplete_iff_clusterPt.2 fun l hl hls => ?_⟩
haveI := hl.1
rcases H (Ultrafilter.of l) hl.ultrafilter_of ((Ultrafilter.of_le l).trans hls) with ⟨x, hxs, hxl⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, (ClusterPt.of_le_nhds hxl).mono (Ultrafilter.of_le l)⟩
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter' {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → s ∈ l → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
isComplete_iff_ultrafilter.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
protected theorem IsComplete.union {s t : Set α} (hs : IsComplete s) (ht : IsComplete t) :
IsComplete (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [isComplete_iff_ultrafilter', Ultrafilter.union_mem_iff, or_imp] at *
exact fun l hl =>
⟨fun hsl => (hs l hl hsl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inl hx.1, hx.2⟩, fun htl =>
(ht l hl htl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inr hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩
theorem isComplete_iUnion_separated {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, IsComplete (s i))
{U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) (hd : ∀ (i j : ι), ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s j, (x, y) ∈ U → i = j) :
IsComplete (⋃ i, s i) := by
set S := ⋃ i, s i
intro l hl hls
rw [le_principal_iff] at hls
obtain ⟨hl_ne, hl'⟩ := cauchy_iff.1 hl
obtain ⟨t, htS, htl, htU⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ S ∧ t ∈ l ∧ t ×ˢ t ⊆ U := by
rcases hl' U hU with ⟨t, htl, htU⟩
refine ⟨t ∩ S, inter_subset_right, inter_mem htl hls, Subset.trans ?_ htU⟩
gcongr <;> apply inter_subset_left
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, t ⊆ s i := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem htl with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hx) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, fun y hy => ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hy) with ⟨j, hj⟩
rwa [hd i j x hi y hj (htU <| mk_mem_prod hx hy)]
rcases hs i l hl (le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_of_superset htl hi) with ⟨x, hxs, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hxs⟩, hlx⟩
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class CompleteSpace (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Prop where
/-- In a complete uniform space, every Cauchy filter converges. -/
complete : ∀ {f : Filter α}, Cauchy f → ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem complete_univ {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompleteSpace α] :
IsComplete (univ : Set α) := fun f hf _ => by
rcases CompleteSpace.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_univ x, hx⟩
instance CompleteSpace.prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace α] [CompleteSpace β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_fst
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_snd
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod]; constructor <;> assumption⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.fst_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace α where
complete hf :=
let ⟨y⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.prod <| cauchy_pure (a := y)
⟨a, by simpa only [map_fst_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.fst) hab⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.snd_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty α] :
CompleteSpace β where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| (cauchy_pure (a := x)).prod hf
⟨b, by simpa only [map_snd_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.snd) hab⟩
lemma completeSpace_prod_of_nonempty [UniformSpace β] [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) ↔ CompleteSpace α ∧ CompleteSpace β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨.fst_of_prod (β := β), .snd_of_prod (α := α)⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ .prod⟩
@[to_additive]
instance CompleteSpace.mulOpposite [CompleteSpace α] : CompleteSpace αᵐᵒᵖ where
complete hf :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.exists.mpr <|
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete (hf.map MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop)
⟨x, (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hx).trans_eq <| MulOpposite.comap_unop_nhds _⟩
/-- If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
theorem completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ (h : IsComplete (univ : Set α)) : CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h _ hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top); ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ : CompleteSpace α ↔ IsComplete (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@complete_univ α _, completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_ultrafilter :
CompleteSpace α ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ∃ x : α, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, isComplete_iff_ultrafilter]
theorem cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∃ x, l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨CompleteSpace.complete, fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => cauchy_nhds.mono hx⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ ∃ x, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds
/-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete [Preorder β] [CompleteSpace α] {u : β → α}
(H : CauchySeq u) : ∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) :=
CompleteSpace.complete H
/-- If `K` is a complete subset, then any cauchy sequence in `K` converges to a point in `K` -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete [Preorder β] {K : Set α} (h₁ : IsComplete K)
{u : β → α} (h₂ : ∀ n, u n ∈ K) (h₃ : CauchySeq u) : ∃ v ∈ K, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 v) :=
h₁ _ h₃ <| le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_map_iff_exists_image.2
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [image_univ, range_subset_iff]⟩
theorem Cauchy.le_nhds_lim [CompleteSpace α] {f : Filter α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
haveI := hf.1.nonempty; f ≤ 𝓝 (lim f) :=
_root_.le_nhds_lim (CompleteSpace.complete hf)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_limUnder [Preorder β] [CompleteSpace α] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
haveI := h.1.nonempty; Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 <| limUnder atTop u) :=
h.le_nhds_lim
theorem IsClosed.isComplete [CompleteSpace α] {s : Set α} (h : IsClosed s) : IsComplete s :=
fun _ cf fs =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete cf
⟨x, isClosed_iff_clusterPt.mp h x (cf.left.mono (le_inf hx fs)), hx⟩
/-- A set `s` is totally bounded if for every entourage `d` there is a finite
set of points `t` such that every element of `s` is `d`-near to some element of `t`. -/
def TotallyBounded (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d }
theorem TotallyBounded.exists_subset {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) {U : Set (α × α)}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ U } := by
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hU with ⟨r, hr, rs, rU⟩
rcases hs r hr with ⟨k, fk, ks⟩
let u := k ∩ { y | ∃ x ∈ s, (x, y) ∈ r }
choose f hfs hfr using fun x : u => x.coe_prop.2
refine ⟨range f, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact range_subset_iff.2 hfs
· haveI : Fintype u := (fk.inter_of_left _).fintype
exact finite_range f
· intro x xs
obtain ⟨y, hy, xy⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 (ks xs)
rw [biUnion_range, mem_iUnion]
set z : ↥u := ⟨y, hy, ⟨x, xs, xy⟩⟩
exact ⟨z, rU <| mem_compRel.2 ⟨y, xy, rs (hfr z)⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff_subset {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔
∀ d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d } :=
⟨fun H _ hd ↦ H.exists_subset hd, fun H d hd ↦ let ⟨t, _, ht⟩ := H d hd; ⟨t, ht⟩⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.totallyBounded_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t : Set α, Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ U i } :=
H.forall_iff fun _ _ hUV h =>
h.imp fun _ ht => ⟨ht.1, ht.2.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ hy => hUV hy⟩
theorem totallyBounded_of_forall_symm {s : Set α}
(h : ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsSymmetricRel V → ∃ t : Set α, Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y V) :
TotallyBounded s :=
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.totallyBounded_iff.2 fun V hV => by
simpa only [ball_eq_of_symmetry hV.2] using h V hV.1 hV.2
theorem TotallyBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h : TotallyBounded s₂) :
TotallyBounded s₁ := fun d hd =>
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h d hd
⟨t, ht₁, Subset.trans hs ht₂⟩
/-- The closure of a totally bounded set is totally bounded. -/
theorem TotallyBounded.closure {s : Set α} (h : TotallyBounded s) : TotallyBounded (closure s) :=
uniformity_hasBasis_closed.totallyBounded_iff.2 fun V hV =>
let ⟨t, htf, hst⟩ := h V hV.1
⟨t, htf, closure_minimal hst <| htf.isClosed_biUnion fun _ _ => hV.2.preimage (.prodMk_left _)⟩
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_closure {s : Set α} : TotallyBounded (closure s) ↔ TotallyBounded s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.subset subset_closure, TotallyBounded.closure⟩
/-- A finite indexed union is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
TotallyBounded (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, TotallyBounded (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ h.subset (subset_iUnion _ _), fun h U hU ↦ ?_⟩
choose t htf ht using (h · U hU)
refine ⟨⋃ i, t i, finite_iUnion htf, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_iUnion]
gcongr; apply ht
/-- A union indexed by a finite set is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
lemma totallyBounded_biUnion {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set α} :
TotallyBounded (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, TotallyBounded (s i) := by
have := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, totallyBounded_iUnion, Subtype.forall]
/-- A union of a finite family of sets is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
lemma totallyBounded_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) :
TotallyBounded (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, TotallyBounded s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, totallyBounded_biUnion hS]
/-- A finite set is totally bounded. -/
lemma Set.Finite.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : TotallyBounded s := fun _U hU ↦
⟨s, hs, fun _x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx <| refl_mem_uniformity hU⟩
/-- A subsingleton is totally bounded. -/
lemma Set.Subsingleton.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
TotallyBounded s :=
hs.finite.totallyBounded
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_singleton (a : α) : TotallyBounded {a} := (finite_singleton a).totallyBounded
@[simp]
theorem totallyBounded_empty : TotallyBounded (∅ : Set α) := finite_empty.totallyBounded
/-- The union of two sets is totally bounded
if and only if each of the two sets is totally bounded. -/
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_union {s t : Set α} :
TotallyBounded (s ∪ t) ↔ TotallyBounded s ∧ TotallyBounded t := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, totallyBounded_iUnion]
simp [and_comm]
/-- The union of two totally bounded sets is totally bounded. -/
protected lemma TotallyBounded.union {s t : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) (ht : TotallyBounded t) :
TotallyBounded (s ∪ t) :=
totallyBounded_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_insert (a : α) {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded (insert a s) ↔ TotallyBounded s := by
simp_rw [← singleton_union, totallyBounded_union, totallyBounded_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, TotallyBounded.insert⟩ := totallyBounded_insert
/-- The image of a totally bounded set under a uniformly continuous map is totally bounded. -/
theorem TotallyBounded.image [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s)
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : TotallyBounded (f '' s) := fun t ht =>
have : { p : α × α | (f p.1, f p.2) ∈ t } ∈ 𝓤 α := hf ht
let ⟨c, hfc, hct⟩ := hs _ this
⟨f '' c, hfc.image f, by
simp only [mem_image, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and', iUnion_iUnion_eq_right, image_subset_iff,
preimage_iUnion, preimage_setOf_eq]
simp? [subset_def] at hct says
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, subset_def, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hct
intro x hx
simpa using hct x hx⟩
theorem Ultrafilter.cauchy_of_totallyBounded {s : Set α} (f : Ultrafilter α) (hs : TotallyBounded s)
(h : ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s) : Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
⟨f.neBot', fun _ ht =>
let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'_symm, ht'_t⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht
let ⟨i, hi, hs_union⟩ := hs t' ht'₁
have : (⋃ y ∈ i, { x | (x, y) ∈ t' }) ∈ f := mem_of_superset (le_principal_iff.mp h) hs_union
have : ∃ y ∈ i, { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ∈ f := (Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hi).1 this
let ⟨y, _, hif⟩ := this
have : { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ×ˢ { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ⊆ compRel t' t' :=
fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨(h₁ : (_, y) ∈ t'), (h₂ : (_, y) ∈ t')⟩ => ⟨y, h₁, ht'_symm h₂⟩
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hif hif) (Subset.trans this ht'_t)⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff_filter {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ f, NeBot f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ c ≤ f, Cauchy c := by
constructor
· exact fun H f hf hfs => ⟨Ultrafilter.of f, Ultrafilter.of_le f,
(Ultrafilter.of f).cauchy_of_totallyBounded H ((Ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩
· intro H d hd
contrapose! H with hd_cover
set f := ⨅ t : Finset α, 𝓟 (s \ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d })
have hb : HasAntitoneBasis f fun t : Finset α ↦ s \ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d } :=
.iInf_principal fun _ _ ↦ diff_subset_diff_right ∘ biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
have : Filter.NeBot f := hb.1.neBot_iff.2 fun _ ↦
diff_nonempty.2 <| hd_cover _ (Finset.finite_toSet _)
have : f ≤ 𝓟 s := iInf_le_of_le ∅ (by simp)
refine ⟨f, ‹_›, ‹_›, fun c hcf hc => ?_⟩
rcases mem_prod_same_iff.1 (hc.2 hd) with ⟨m, hm, hmd⟩
rcases hc.1.nonempty_of_mem hm with ⟨y, hym⟩
have : s \ {x | (x, y) ∈ d} ∈ c := by simpa using hcf (hb.mem {y})
rcases hc.1.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hm this) with ⟨z, hzm, -, hyz⟩
exact hyz (hmd ⟨hzm, hym⟩)
theorem totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter α, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → Cauchy (f : Filter α) := by
refine ⟨fun hs f => f.cauchy_of_totallyBounded hs, fun H => totallyBounded_iff_filter.2 ?_⟩
intro f hf hfs
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.of f, Ultrafilter.of_le f, H _ ((Ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩
theorem isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete {s : Set α} :
IsCompact s ↔ TotallyBounded s ∧ IsComplete s :=
⟨fun hs =>
⟨totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf =>
let ⟨_, _, fx⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.1 hs f hf
cauchy_nhds.mono fx,
fun f fc fs =>
let ⟨a, as, fa⟩ := @hs f fc.1 fs
⟨a, as, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp fc fa⟩⟩,
fun ⟨ht, hc⟩ =>
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2 fun f hf =>
hc _ (totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter.1 ht f hf) hf⟩
protected theorem IsCompact.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : TotallyBounded s :=
(isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 h).1
protected theorem IsCompact.isComplete {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : IsComplete s :=
(isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 h).2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) complete_of_compact {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompactSpace α] :
CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => by simpa using (isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 isCompact_univ).2 _ hf⟩
theorem isCompact_of_totallyBounded_isClosed [CompleteSpace α] {s : Set α} (ht : TotallyBounded s)
(hc : IsClosed s) : IsCompact s :=
(@isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete α _ s).2 ⟨ht, hc.isComplete⟩
/-- Every Cauchy sequence over `ℕ` is totally bounded. -/
theorem CauchySeq.totallyBounded_range {s : ℕ → α} (hs : CauchySeq s) :
TotallyBounded (range s) := by
intro a ha
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cauchySeq_iff.1 hs a ha
refine ⟨s '' { k | k ≤ n }, (finite_le_nat _).image _, ?_⟩
rw [range_subset_iff, biUnion_image]
intro m
rw [mem_iUnion₂]
rcases le_total m n with hm | hm
exacts [⟨m, hm, refl_mem_uniformity ha⟩, ⟨n, le_refl n, hn m hm n le_rfl⟩]
/-- Given a family of points `xs n`, a family of entourages `V n` of the diagonal and a family of
natural numbers `u n`, the intersection over `n` of the `V n`-neighborhood of `xs 1, ..., xs (u n)`.
Designed to be relatively compact when `V n` tends to the diagonal. -/
def interUnionBalls (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) (V : ℕ → Set (α × α)) : Set α :=
⋂ n, ⋃ m ≤ u n, UniformSpace.ball (xs m) (Prod.swap ⁻¹' V n)
lemma totallyBounded_interUnionBalls {p : ℕ → Prop} {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)}
(H : (uniformity α).HasBasis p U) (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) :
TotallyBounded (interUnionBalls xs u U) := by
rw [Filter.HasBasis.totallyBounded_iff H]
intro i _
have h_subset : interUnionBalls xs u U
⊆ ⋃ m ≤ u i, UniformSpace.ball (xs m) (Prod.swap ⁻¹' U i) :=
fun x hx ↦ Set.mem_iInter.1 hx i
classical
refine ⟨Finset.image xs (Finset.range (u i + 1)), Finset.finite_toSet _, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_range, mem_image, mem_Iio, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and',
iUnion_iUnion_eq_right, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact h_subset hx
/-- The construction `interUnionBalls` is used to have a relatively compact set. -/
theorem isCompact_closure_interUnionBalls {p : ℕ → Prop} {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)}
(H : (uniformity α).HasBasis p U) [CompleteSpace α] (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) :
IsCompact (closure (interUnionBalls xs u U)) := by
rw [isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete]
refine ⟨TotallyBounded.closure ?_, isClosed_closure.isComplete⟩
exact totallyBounded_interUnionBalls H xs u
/-!
### Sequentially complete space
In this section we prove that a uniform space is complete provided that it is sequentially complete
(i.e., any Cauchy sequence converges) and its uniformity filter admits a countable generating set.
In particular, this applies to (e)metric spaces, see the files `Topology/MetricSpace/EmetricSpace`
and `Topology/MetricSpace/Basic`.
More precisely, we assume that there is a sequence of entourages `U_n` such that any other
entourage includes one of `U_n`. Then any Cauchy filter `f` generates a decreasing sequence of
sets `s_n ∈ f` such that `s_n × s_n ⊆ U_n`. Choose a sequence `x_n∈s_n`. It is easy to show
that this is a Cauchy sequence. If this sequence converges to some `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/
namespace SequentiallyComplete
variable {f : Filter α} (hf : Cauchy f) {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α)
open Set Finset
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence of sets approximating a Cauchy filter. -/
def setSeqAux (n : ℕ) : { s : Set α // s ∈ f ∧ s ×ˢ s ⊆ U n } :=
Classical.indefiniteDescription _ <| (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 (U n) (U_mem n)
/-- Given a Cauchy filter `f` and a sequence `U` of entourages, `set_seq` provides
an antitone sequence of sets `s n ∈ f` such that `s n ×ˢ s n ⊆ U`. -/
def setSeq (n : ℕ) : Set α :=
⋂ m ∈ Set.Iic n, (setSeqAux hf U_mem m).val
theorem setSeq_mem (n : ℕ) : setSeq hf U_mem n ∈ f :=
(biInter_mem (finite_le_nat n)).2 fun m _ => (setSeqAux hf U_mem m).2.1
theorem setSeq_mono ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ setSeq hf U_mem m :=
biInter_subset_biInter_left <| Iic_subset_Iic.2 h
theorem setSeq_sub_aux (n : ℕ) : setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ setSeqAux hf U_mem n :=
biInter_subset_of_mem right_mem_Iic
theorem setSeq_prod_subset {N m n} (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) :
setSeq hf U_mem m ×ˢ setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ U N := fun p hp => by
refine (setSeqAux hf U_mem N).2.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> apply setSeq_sub_aux
· exact setSeq_mono hf U_mem hm hp.1
· exact setSeq_mono hf U_mem hn hp.2
/-- A sequence of points such that `seq n ∈ setSeq n`. Here `setSeq` is an antitone
sequence of sets `setSeq n ∈ f` with diameters controlled by a given sequence
of entourages. -/
def seq (n : ℕ) : α :=
(hf.1.nonempty_of_mem (setSeq_mem hf U_mem n)).choose
theorem seq_mem (n : ℕ) : seq hf U_mem n ∈ setSeq hf U_mem n :=
(hf.1.nonempty_of_mem (setSeq_mem hf U_mem n)).choose_spec
theorem seq_pair_mem ⦃N m n : ℕ⦄ (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) :
(seq hf U_mem m, seq hf U_mem n) ∈ U N :=
setSeq_prod_subset hf U_mem hm hn ⟨seq_mem hf U_mem m, seq_mem hf U_mem n⟩
theorem seq_is_cauchySeq (U_le : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) : CauchySeq <| seq hf U_mem :=
cauchySeq_of_controlled U U_le <| seq_pair_mem hf U_mem
/-- If the sequence `SequentiallyComplete.seq` converges to `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds (U_le : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s)
⦃a : α⦄ (ha : Tendsto (seq hf U_mem) atTop (𝓝 a)) : f ≤ 𝓝 a :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
rcases U_le s hs with ⟨m, hm⟩
rcases tendsto_atTop'.1 ha _ (mem_nhds_left a (U_mem m)) with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine
⟨setSeq hf U_mem (max m n), setSeq_mem hf U_mem _, ?_, seq hf U_mem (max m n), ?_,
seq_mem hf U_mem _⟩
· have := le_max_left m n
exact Set.Subset.trans (setSeq_prod_subset hf U_mem this this) hm
| · exact hm (hn _ <| le_max_right m n))
end
end SequentiallyComplete
namespace UniformSpace
open SequentiallyComplete
variable [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 750 | 760 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
variable {K}
lemma den_mem_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(algebraMap R₁ K) (I.den : R₁) ∈ I⁻¹ := by
rw [mem_inv_iff hI]
intro i hi
rw [← Algebra.smul_def (I.den : R₁) i, ← mem_coe, coe_one]
suffices Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) I.num ≤ 1 from
this <| (den_mul_self_eq_num I).symm ▸ smul_mem_pointwise_smul i I.den I.coeToSubmodule hi
apply le_trans <| map_mono (show I.num ≤ 1 by simp only [Ideal.one_eq_top, le_top, bot_eq_zero])
rw [Ideal.one_eq_top, Submodule.map_top, one_eq_range]
lemma num_le_mul_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I.num ≤ I * I⁻¹ := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, num_zero_eq <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K, zero_mul, zero_eq_bot,
coeIdeal_bot]
· rw [mul_comm, ← den_mul_self_eq_num']
exact mul_right_mono I <| spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.2 (den_mem_inv hI)
lemma bot_lt_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < I * I⁻¹ :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (coeIdeal_ne_zero.2 (hI ∘ num_eq_zero_iff.1)).bot_lt I.num_le_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : IsIdempotentElem I := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, adjoinIntegral_coe, I]
rw [(Algebra.adjoin A {x}).isIdempotentElem_toSubmodule]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
include h
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
((P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) this
_ = M := ?_
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne,
one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
· rw [← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul]
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebraMap _ _ y` for some `y`.
intro x hx
have le_one : (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ 1 := by
rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A)).mpr hM.le)
obtain ⟨y, _hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp (le_one hx)
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt hM
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := mul_mem_mul (mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal A⁰).mp zy_mem
rw [IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A) zy_eq] at hzy
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ (Or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)⟩
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`IsDedekindDomainInv` and `IsDedekindDomain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain : IsDedekindDomain A :=
{ h.isNoetherianRing, h.dimensionLEOne, h.integrallyClosed with }
end IsDedekindDomainInv
end IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable {A K}
theorem one_mem_inv_coe_ideal [IsDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI)]
intro y hy
rw [one_mul]
exact FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_le_one hy
/-- Specialization of `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : Ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
theorem exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [IsDedekindDomain A] (hNF : ¬IsField A)
{I M : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.IsMaximal] :
∃ Z : Multiset (PrimeSpectrum A),
(M ::ₘ Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧
¬Multiset.prod (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal) ≤ I := by
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := PrimeSpectrum.exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ :=
wellFounded_lt.has_min
{Z | (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥}
⟨Z₀, hZ₀.1, hZ₀.2⟩
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := hM.isPrime.multiset_prod_le.mp (hZI.trans hIM)
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ'
classical
have := Multiset.map_erase PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal (fun _ _ => PrimeSpectrum.ext) P Z
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.asIdeal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥ := by
rwa [Ne, ← Multiset.cons_erase hPZ', Multiset.prod_cons, Ideal.mul_eq_bot, not_or, ←
this] at hprodZ
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (P.isPrime.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM
subst hPM'
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert hZI
rw [this, Multiset.cons_erase hPZ']
· refine fun h => h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, ?_⟩ (Multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ)
exact hZP0
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
lemma not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A}
(hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ¬(I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) ≤ 1 := by
have hNF : ¬IsField A := fun h ↦ letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).elim hI0 hI1
wlog hM : I.IsMaximal generalizing I
· rcases I.exists_le_maximal hI1 with ⟨M, hmax, hIM⟩
have hMbot : M ≠ ⊥ := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne'
refine mt (le_trans <| inv_anti_mono ?_ ?_ ?_) (this hMbot hmax.ne_top hmax) <;>
simpa only [coeIdeal_ne_zero, coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal]
have hI0 : ⊥ < I := I.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF
obtain ⟨⟨a, haI⟩, ha0⟩ := Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt hI0
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0
let J : Ideal A := Ideal.span {a}
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0
have hJI : J ≤ I := I.span_singleton_le_iff_mem.2 haI
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJI
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := SetLike.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle
have hnz_fa : algebraMap A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) a) ha0
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine Set.not_subset.2 ⟨algebraMap A K b * (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff ?_).mpr ?_, ?_⟩
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0.ne'
· rintro y₀ hy₀
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy₀
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J := by
apply hle
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at h_yb
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hnz_fa, mul_one]
apply coe_mem_one
· refine mt (mem_one_iff _).mp ?_
rintro ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← RingHom.map_mul] at h₂_abs
have := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', IsFractionRing.injective A K h₂_abs⟩
contradiction
theorem exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x ∉ (1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :=
Set.not_subset.1 <| not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot hI0 hI1
theorem mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI : (I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1) : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ J : Ideal A, (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) = I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp mul_one_div_le_one
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥
· subst hJ0
refine absurd ?_ hI0
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K, hJ]
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤
· rw [← hJ, hJ1, coeIdeal_top]
exact (not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot (K := K) hJ0 hJ1 (hJ ▸ hI)).elim
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
theorem coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : IsDedekindDomain A] (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0
by_cases hJ0 : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0
· rw [hJ0, inv_zero']; exact zero_le _
intro x hx
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices x ∈ integralClosure A K by
rwa [IsIntegrallyClosed.integralClosure_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range,
← mem_one_iff] at this
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw [mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg]
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
intro b hb
rw [mem_inv_iff (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0)]
dsimp only at hx
rw [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ0] at hx
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at hx ⊢
intro y hy
exact hx _ (mul_mem_mul hy hb)
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : A[X]` works.
refine ⟨AlgHom.range (Polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
isNoetherian_submodule.mp (isNoetherian (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) _ fun y hy => ?_,
⟨Polynomial.X, Polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (AlgHom.mem_range _).mp hy
rw [Polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ?_
clear hi
induction' i with i ih
· rw [pow_zero]; exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0
· show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)
rw [pow_succ']; exact x_mul_mem _ ih
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : Ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
suffices h₂ : I * (spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) = 1 by
rw [mul_inv_cancel_iff]
exact ⟨spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹, h₂⟩
subst hJ
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
· exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap A K)).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) _) ha
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne)
theorem mul_right_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' := by
intro I I'
constructor
· intro h
convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h <;> dsimp only <;>
rw [mul_assoc, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
· exact fun h => mul_right_mono J h
theorem mul_left_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} :
J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' := by convert mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
theorem mul_right_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (· * I) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm
theorem mul_left_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (I * ·) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm
/-- This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem div_eq_mul_inv [IsDedekindDomain A] (I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero]
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp ?_) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr ?_)
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le]
intro x hx y hy
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx
exact hx y hy
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
end FractionalIdeal
/-- `IsDedekindDomain` and `IsDedekindDomainInv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv [IsDomain A] :
IsDedekindDomain A ↔ IsDedekindDomainInv A :=
⟨fun _h _I hI => FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hI, fun h => h.isDedekindDomain⟩
end Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
#adaptation_note /-- 2025-03-29 for lean4#7717 had to add `mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero` field.
TODO(kmill) There is trouble calculating the type of the `IsLeftCancelMulZero` parent. -/
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`FractionalIdeal.semifield`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := mul_left_cancel₀
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel₀ hI']
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h)
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hI', one_mul]⟩
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wf := by
have : WellFoundedGT (Ideal A) := inferInstance
convert this.wf
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_isUnit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_isUnit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_intro x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) := .ofUniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`. -/
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_inj_of_not_isUnit (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top) hP).mp i.succ_ne_self)
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
/-- Strengthening of `IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hy
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x _ hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
section Gcd
namespace Ideal
/-! ### GCD and LCM of ideals in a Dedekind domain
We show that the gcd of two ideals in a Dedekind domain is just their supremum,
and the lcm is their infimum, and use this to instantiate `NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_inf (I J : Ideal A) : (I ⊔ J) * (I ⊓ J) = I * J := by
letI := UniqueFactorizationMonoid.toNormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)
have hgcd : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [gcd_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [dvd_iff_le, sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _⟩
· rw [dvd_gcd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
have hlcm : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := by
rw [lcm_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
· rw [dvd_iff_le, le_inf_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩
rw [← hgcd, ← hlcm, associated_iff_eq.mp (gcd_mul_lcm _ _)]
/-- Ideals in a Dedekind domain have gcd and lcm operators that (trivially) are compatible with
the normalization operator. -/
instance : NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ Ideal.normalizationMonoid with
gcd := (· ⊔ ·)
gcd_dvd_left := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_left
gcd_dvd_right := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_right
dvd_gcd := by
simp only [dvd_iff_le]
exact fun h1 h2 => @sup_le (Ideal A) _ _ _ _ h1 h2
lcm := (· ⊓ ·)
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq]
lcm_zero_right := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq]
gcd_mul_lcm := fun _ _ => by rw [associated_iff_eq, sup_mul_inf]
normalize_gcd := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _
normalize_lcm := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _ }
-- In fact, any lawful gcd and lcm would equal sup and inf respectively.
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_sup (I J : Ideal A) : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_inf (I J : Ideal A) : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := rfl
theorem isCoprime_iff_gcd {I J : Ideal A} : IsCoprime I J ↔ gcd I J = 1 := by
rw [Ideal.isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, one_eq_top, gcd_eq_sup]
theorem factors_span_eq {p : K[X]} : factors (span {p}) = (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp; · simpa [Set.singleton_zero] using normalizedFactors_zero
have : ∀ q ∈ (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}), Prime q := fun q hq ↦ by
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hq
exact prime_span_singleton_iff.mpr <| prime_of_factor r hr
rw [← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr (factors_prod hp), ← multiset_prod_span_singleton,
factors_eq_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime this]
end Ideal
end Gcd
end IsDedekindDomain
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] [IsDedekindDomain T] {I J : Ideal T}
| open Multiset UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
theorem prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : (normalizedFactors I).prod = I :=
associated_iff_eq.1 (prod_normalizedFactors hI)
theorem count_le_of_ideal_ge [DecidableEq (Ideal T)]
{I J : Ideal T} (h : I ≤ J) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (K : Ideal T) :
count K (normalizedFactors J) ≤ count K (normalizedFactors I) :=
le_iff_count.1 ((dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI h) hI).1
(dvd_iff_le.2 h))
_
theorem sup_eq_prod_inf_factors [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
I ⊔ J = (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod := by
have H : normalizedFactors (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod =
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 862 | 876 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Order.RelSeries
/-!
# Jordan-Hölder Theorem
This file proves the Jordan Hölder theorem for a `JordanHolderLattice`, a class also defined in
this file. Examples of `JordanHolderLattice` include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and
`Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module. Using this approach the theorem need not be proved
separately for both groups and modules, the proof in this file can be applied to both.
## Main definitions
The main definitions in this file are `JordanHolderLattice` and `CompositionSeries`,
and the relation `Equivalent` on `CompositionSeries`
A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of the lattice `X` such that
each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a `CompositionSeries X` is
one less than the number of elements in the series. Note that there is no stipulation
that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at the top.
For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i, s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))`
## Main theorems
The main theorem is `CompositionSeries.jordan_holder`, which says that if two composition
series have the same least element and the same largest element,
then they are `Equivalent`.
## TODO
Provide instances of `JordanHolderLattice` for subgroups, and potentially for modular lattices.
It is not entirely clear how this should be done. Possibly there should be no global instances
of `JordanHolderLattice`, and the instances should only be defined locally in order to prove
the Jordan-Hölder theorem for modules/groups and the API should be transferred because many of the
theorems in this file will have stronger versions for modules. There will also need to be an API for
mapping composition series across homomorphisms. It is also probably possible to
provide an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for any `ModularLattice`, and in this case the
Jordan-Hölder theorem will say that there is a well defined notion of length of a modular lattice.
However an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for a modular lattice will not be able to contain
the correct notion of isomorphism for modules, so a separate instance for modules will still be
required and this will clash with the instance for modular lattices, and so at least one of these
instances should not be a global instance.
> [!NOTE]
> The previous paragraph indicates that the instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for submodules should
> be obtained via `ModularLattice`. This is not the case in `mathlib4`.
> See `JordanHolderModule.instJordanHolderLattice`.
-/
universe u
open Set RelSeries
/-- A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
Examples include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and `Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module.
-/
class JordanHolderLattice (X : Type u) [Lattice X] where
IsMaximal : X → X → Prop
lt_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x y → x < y
sup_eq_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y z}, IsMaximal x z → IsMaximal y z → x ≠ y → x ⊔ y = z
isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup :
∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) x
Iso : X × X → X × X → Prop
iso_symm : ∀ {x y}, Iso x y → Iso y x
iso_trans : ∀ {x y z}, Iso x y → Iso y z → Iso x z
second_iso : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → Iso (x, x ⊔ y) (x ⊓ y, y)
namespace JordanHolderLattice
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup {x y : X} (hxz : IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y))
(hyz : IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y)) : IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) y := by
rw [inf_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at hxz hyz
exact isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup hyz hxz
theorem isMaximal_of_eq_inf (x b : X) {a y : X} (ha : x ⊓ y = a) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hxb : IsMaximal x b)
(hyb : IsMaximal y b) : IsMaximal a y := by
have hb : x ⊔ y = b := sup_eq_of_isMaximal hxb hyb hxy
substs a b
exact isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup hxb hyb
theorem second_iso_of_eq {x y a b : X} (hm : IsMaximal x a) (ha : x ⊔ y = a) (hb : x ⊓ y = b) :
Iso (x, a) (b, y) := by substs a b; exact second_iso hm
theorem IsMaximal.iso_refl {x y : X} (h : IsMaximal x y) : Iso (x, y) (x, y) :=
second_iso_of_eq h (sup_eq_right.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
(inf_eq_left.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
end JordanHolderLattice
open JordanHolderLattice
attribute [symm] iso_symm
attribute [trans] iso_trans
/-- A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of a
`JordanHolderLattice` such that each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a
`CompositionSeries X` is one less than the number of elements in the series.
Note that there is no stipulation that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at
the top. For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
-/
abbrev CompositionSeries (X : Type u) [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X] : Type u :=
RelSeries (IsMaximal (X := X))
namespace CompositionSeries
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem lt_succ (s : CompositionSeries X) (i : Fin s.length) :
s (Fin.castSucc i) < s (Fin.succ i) :=
lt_of_isMaximal (s.step _)
protected theorem strictMono (s : CompositionSeries X) : StrictMono s :=
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 s.lt_succ
protected theorem injective (s : CompositionSeries X) : Function.Injective s :=
s.strictMono.injective
@[simp]
protected theorem inj (s : CompositionSeries X) {i j : Fin s.length.succ} : s i = s j ↔ i = j :=
s.injective.eq_iff
theorem total {s : CompositionSeries X} {x y : X} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hx with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hy with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [s.strictMono.le_iff_le, s.strictMono.le_iff_le]
exact le_total i j
theorem toList_sorted (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Sorted (· < ·) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.2 fun i j h => by
dsimp only [RelSeries.toList]
rw [List.get_ofFn, List.get_ofFn]
exact s.strictMono h
theorem toList_nodup (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Nodup :=
s.toList_sorted.nodup
/-- Two `CompositionSeries` are equal if they have the same elements. See also `ext_fun`. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
toList_injective <|
List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted
(by
classical
exact List.perm_of_nodup_nodup_toFinset_eq s₁.toList_nodup s₂.toList_nodup
(Finset.ext <| by simpa only [List.mem_toFinset, RelSeries.mem_toList]))
s₁.toList_sorted s₂.toList_sorted
@[simp]
theorem le_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s i ≤ s.last :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.le_last _)
theorem le_last_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : x ≤ s.last :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ le_last _
@[simp]
theorem head_le {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s.head ≤ s i :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.zero_le _)
theorem head_le_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.head ≤ x :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ head_le _
theorem last_eraseLast_le (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.eraseLast.last ≤ s.last := by
simp [eraseLast, last, s.strictMono.le_iff_le, Fin.le_iff_val_le_val]
theorem mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X}
(hx : x ≠ s.last) (hxs : x ∈ s) : x ∈ s.eraseLast := by
rcases hxs with ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < (s.length - 1).succ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.succ_sub (length_pos_of_nontrivial ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, _, s.last_mem, hx⟩),
Nat.add_one_sub_one]
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.2) (by simpa [last, s.inj, Fin.ext_iff] using hx)
refine ⟨Fin.castSucc (n := s.length + 1) i, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
x ∈ s.eraseLast ↔ x ≠ s.last ∧ x ∈ s := by
simp only [RelSeries.mem_def, eraseLast]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length, Nat.succ_sub h]
exact i.2
simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, ne_of_lt hi, -Set.mem_range, Set.mem_range_self]
· intro h
exact mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem h.1 h.2
theorem lt_last_of_mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length)
(hx : x ∈ s.eraseLast) : x < s.last :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (le_last_of_mem ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).2) ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).1
theorem isMaximal_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last := by
have : s.length - 1 + 1 = s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length]; rw [Nat.succ_sub h]
rw [last_eraseLast, last]
convert s.step ⟨s.length - 1, by omega⟩; ext; simp [this]
theorem eq_snoc_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
s = snoc (eraseLast s) s.last (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_snoc, mem_eraseLast h, ne_eq]
by_cases h : x = s.last <;> simp [*, s.last_mem]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last) :
s.eraseLast.snoc s.last h = s :=
have h : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (fun hs => ne_of_gt (lt_of_isMaximal h) <| by simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, hs])
(eq_snoc_eraseLast h).symm
/-- Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i) (s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))` -/
def Equivalent (s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X) : Prop :=
∃ f : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length,
∀ i : Fin s₁.length, Iso (s₁ (Fin.castSucc i), s₁ i.succ)
(s₂ (Fin.castSucc (f i)), s₂ (Fin.succ (f i)))
namespace Equivalent
@[refl]
theorem refl (s : CompositionSeries X) : Equivalent s s :=
⟨Equiv.refl _, fun _ => (s.step _).iso_refl⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : Equivalent s₂ s₁ :=
⟨h.choose.symm, fun i => iso_symm (by simpa using h.choose_spec (h.choose.symm i))⟩
@[trans]
theorem trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : CompositionSeries X} (h₁ : Equivalent s₁ s₂) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ s₃) :
Equivalent s₁ s₃ :=
⟨h₁.choose.trans h₂.choose,
fun i => iso_trans (h₁.choose_spec i) (h₂.choose_spec (h₁.choose i))⟩
protected theorem smash {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hs : s₁.last = s₂.head) (ht : t₁.last = t₂.head)
(h₁ : Equivalent s₁ t₁) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ t₂) :
Equivalent (smash s₁ s₂ hs) (smash t₁ t₂ ht) :=
let e : Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ (Fin s₁.length) ⊕ (Fin s₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv.symm
_ ≃ (Fin t₁.length) ⊕ (Fin t₂.length) := Equiv.sumCongr h₁.choose h₂.choose
_ ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv
⟨e, by
intro i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_castAdd, smash_succ_castAdd] using h₁.choose_spec i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_natAdd, smash_succ_natAdd] using h₂.choose_spec i⟩
protected theorem snoc {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s₁.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s₂.last x₂} (hequiv : Equivalent s₁ s₂)
(hlast : Iso (s₁.last, x₁) (s₂.last, x₂)) : Equivalent (s₁.snoc x₁ hsat₁) (s₂.snoc x₂ hsat₂) :=
let e : Fin s₁.length.succ ≃ Fin s₂.length.succ :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + 1) ≃ Option (Fin s₁.length) := finSuccEquivLast
_ ≃ Option (Fin s₂.length) := Functor.mapEquiv Option hequiv.choose
_ ≃ Fin (s₂.length + 1) := finSuccEquivLast.symm
⟨e, fun i => by
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ i
· simpa [e, apply_last] using hlast
· intro i
simpa [e, Fin.succ_castSucc] using hequiv.choose_spec i⟩
theorem length_eq {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : s₁.length = s₂.length := by
simpa using Fintype.card_congr h.choose
theorem snoc_snoc_swap {s : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s.last x₂} {hsaty₁ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).last y₁}
{hsaty₂ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₂ hsat₂).last y₂} (hr₁ : Iso (s.last, x₁) (x₂, y₂))
(hr₂ : Iso (x₁, y₁) (s.last, x₂)) :
Equivalent (snoc (snoc s x₁ hsat₁) y₁ hsaty₁) (snoc (snoc s x₂ hsat₂) y₂ hsaty₂) :=
let e : Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) ≃ Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) :=
Equiv.swap (Fin.last _) (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _))
have h1 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length},
(Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _)) := by simp
have h2 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length}, (Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ Fin.last _ := by simp
⟨e, by
intro i
dsimp only [e]
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_left, snoc_castSucc,
show (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₁ from last_snoc _ _ _, Fin.succ_last,
show ((s.snoc x₁ hsat₁).snoc y₁ hsaty₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = y₁ from last_snoc _ _ _,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last,
show (s.snoc _ hsat₂).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₂ from last_snoc _ _ _]
exact hr₂
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_right, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last, last_snoc', last_snoc', last_snoc']
exact hr₁
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h2 h1, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
exact (s.step i).iso_refl⟩
end Equivalent
theorem length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero
{s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (hb : s₁.head = s₂.head)
(ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁ : s₁.length = 0) : s₂.length = 0 := by
have : Fin.last s₂.length = (0 : Fin s₂.length.succ) :=
s₂.injective (hb.symm.trans ((congr_arg s₁ (Fin.ext (by simp [hs₁]))).trans ht)).symm
simpa [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem length_pos_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_pos {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) : 0 < s₁.length → 0 < s₂.length :=
not_imp_not.1
(by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] using
length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb.symm ht.symm)
theorem eq_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁0 : s₁.length = 0) : s₁ = s₂ := by
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x = s₁.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx => subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs₁0 hx s₁.last_mem, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₁.last_mem⟩
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₂ ↔ x = s₂.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx =>
subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero
(length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb ht
hs₁0) hx s₂.last_mem,
fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₂.last_mem⟩
ext
simp [*]
/-- Given a `CompositionSeries`, `s`, and an element `x`
such that `x` is maximal inside `s.last` there is a series, `t`,
such that `t.last = x`, `t.head = s.head`
and `snoc t s.last _` is equivalent to `s`. -/
theorem exists_last_eq_snoc_equivalent (s : CompositionSeries X) (x : X) (hm : IsMaximal x s.last)
(hb : s.head ≤ x) :
∃ t : CompositionSeries X,
t.head = s.head ∧ t.length + 1 = s.length ∧
∃ htx : t.last = x,
Equivalent s (snoc t s.last (show IsMaximal t.last _ from htx.symm ▸ hm)) := by
induction' hn : s.length with n ih generalizing s x
· exact
(ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt hb (lt_of_isMaximal hm))
(subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hn s.last_mem s.head_mem)).elim
· have h0s : 0 < s.length := hn.symm ▸ Nat.succ_pos _
by_cases hetx : s.eraseLast.last = x
· use s.eraseLast
simp [← hetx, hn, Equivalent.refl]
· have imxs : IsMaximal (x ⊓ s.eraseLast.last) s.eraseLast.last :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf x s.last rfl (Ne.symm hetx) hm (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)
have := ih _ _ imxs (le_inf (by simpa) (le_last_of_mem s.eraseLast.head_mem)) (by simp [hn])
rcases this with ⟨t, htb, htl, htt, hteqv⟩
have hmtx : IsMaximal t.last x :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf s.eraseLast.last s.last (by rw [inf_comm, htt]) hetx
(isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) hm
use snoc t x hmtx
refine ⟨by simp [htb], by simp [htl], by simp, ?_⟩
have : s.Equivalent ((snoc t s.eraseLast.last <| show IsMaximal t.last _ from
htt.symm ▸ imxs).snoc s.last
(by simpa using isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)) := by
conv_lhs => rw [eq_snoc_eraseLast h0s]
exact Equivalent.snoc hteqv (by simpa using (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s).iso_refl)
refine this.trans <| Equivalent.snoc_snoc_swap
(iso_symm
(second_iso_of_eq hm
(sup_eq_of_isMaximal hm (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) (Ne.symm hetx)) htt.symm))
| (second_iso_of_eq (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)
(sup_eq_of_isMaximal (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) hm hetx) (by rw [inf_comm, htt]))
/-- The **Jordan-Hölder** theorem, stated for any `JordanHolderLattice`.
If two composition series start and finish at the same place, they are equivalent. -/
theorem jordan_holder (s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X)
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) :
Equivalent s₁ s₂ := by
induction' hle : s₁.length with n ih generalizing s₁ s₂
· rw [eq_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb ht hle]
· have h0s₂ : 0 < s₂.length :=
length_pos_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_pos hb ht (hle.symm ▸ Nat.succ_pos _)
rcases exists_last_eq_snoc_equivalent s₁ s₂.eraseLast.last
(ht.symm ▸ isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s₂)
(hb.symm ▸ s₂.head_eraseLast ▸ head_le_of_mem (last_mem _)) with
⟨t, htb, htl, htt, hteq⟩
have := ih t s₂.eraseLast (by simp [htb, ← hb]) htt (Nat.succ_inj.1 (htl.trans hle))
refine hteq.trans ?_
conv_rhs => rw [eq_snoc_eraseLast h0s₂]
simp only [ht]
exact Equivalent.snoc this (by simpa [htt] using (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s₂).iso_refl)
end CompositionSeries
| Mathlib/Order/JordanHolder.lean | 397 | 427 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We show that `A[X]` is an R-algebra when `A` is an R-algebra.
We promote `eval₂` to an algebra hom in `aeval`.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {A' B : Type*} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {p q r : R[X]}
/-- Note that this instance also provides `Algebra R R[X]`. -/
instance algebraOfAlgebra : Algebra R A[X] where
smul_def' r p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply]
rw [toFinsupp_smul, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_C]
exact Algebra.smul_def' _ _
commutes' r p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply]
simp_rw [toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_C]
convert Algebra.commutes' r p.toFinsupp
algebraMap := C.comp (algebraMap R A)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (r : R) : algebraMap R A[X] r = C (algebraMap R A r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_algebraMap (r : R) : (algebraMap R A[X] r).toFinsupp = algebraMap R _ r :=
show toFinsupp (C (algebraMap _ _ r)) = _ by
rw [toFinsupp_C]
rfl
theorem ofFinsupp_algebraMap (r : R) : (⟨algebraMap R _ r⟩ : A[X]) = algebraMap R A[X] r :=
toFinsupp_injective (toFinsupp_algebraMap _).symm
/-- When we have `[CommSemiring R]`, the function `C` is the same as `algebraMap R R[X]`.
(But note that `C` is defined when `R` is not necessarily commutative, in which case
`algebraMap` is not available.)
-/
theorem C_eq_algebraMap (r : R) : C r = algebraMap R R[X] r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R R[X] = C :=
rfl
/-- `Polynomial.C` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def CAlgHom : A →ₐ[R] A[X] where
toRingHom := C
commutes' _ := rfl
/-- Extensionality lemma for algebra maps out of `A'[X]` over a smaller base ring than `A'`
-/
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {f g : A[X] →ₐ[R] B}
(hC : f.comp CAlgHom = g.comp CAlgHom)
(hX : f X = g X) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom hC) hX)
variable (R) in
open AddMonoidAlgebra in
/-- Algebra isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoAlg : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[ℕ] :=
{ toFinsuppIso R with
commutes' := fun r => by
dsimp }
instance subalgebraNontrivial [Nontrivial A] : Nontrivial (Subalgebra R A[X]) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, by
rw [Ne, SetLike.ext_iff, not_forall]
refine ⟨X, ?_⟩
simp only [Algebra.mem_bot, not_exists, Set.mem_range, iff_true, Algebra.mem_top,
algebraMap_apply, not_forall]
intro x
rw [ext_iff, not_forall]
refine ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [coeff_C]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem algHom_eval₂_algebraMap {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (p : R[X]) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) :
f (eval₂ (algebraMap R A) a p) = eval₂ (algebraMap R B) (f a) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum_def]
simp only [map_sum, map_mul, map_pow, eq_intCast, map_intCast, AlgHom.commutes]
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_algebraMap_X {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (p : R[X])
(f : R[X] →ₐ[R] A) : eval₂ (algebraMap R A) (f X) p = f p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p]
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum_def]
simp only [map_sum, map_mul, map_pow, eq_intCast, map_intCast]
simp [Polynomial.C_eq_algebraMap]
-- these used to be about `algebraMap ℤ R`, but now the simp-normal form is `Int.castRingHom R`.
@[simp]
theorem ringHom_eval₂_intCastRingHom {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (p : ℤ[X]) (f : R →+* S)
(r : R) : f (eval₂ (Int.castRingHom R) r p) = eval₂ (Int.castRingHom S) (f r) p :=
algHom_eval₂_algebraMap p f.toIntAlgHom r
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_intCastRingHom_X {R : Type*} [Ring R] (p : ℤ[X]) (f : ℤ[X] →+* R) :
eval₂ (Int.castRingHom R) (f X) p = f p :=
eval₂_algebraMap_X p f.toIntAlgHom
/-- `Polynomial.eval₂` as an `AlgHom` for noncommutative algebras.
This is `Polynomial.eval₂RingHom'` for `AlgHom`s. -/
@[simps!]
def eval₂AlgHom' (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (b : B) (hf : ∀ a, Commute (f a) b) : A[X] →ₐ[R] B where
toRingHom := eval₂RingHom' f b hf
commutes' _ := (eval₂_C _ _).trans (f.commutes _)
section Map
/-- `Polynomial.map` as an `AlgHom` for noncommutative algebras.
This is the algebra version of `Polynomial.mapRingHom`. -/
def mapAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Polynomial A →ₐ[R] Polynomial B where
toRingHom := mapRingHom f.toRingHom
commutes' := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(mapAlgHom f) = map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgHom_id : mapAlgHom (AlgHom.id R A) = AlgHom.id R (Polynomial A) :=
AlgHom.ext fun _x => map_id
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgHom_coe_ringHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
↑(mapAlgHom f : _ →ₐ[R] Polynomial B) = (mapRingHom ↑f : Polynomial A →+* Polynomial B) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgHom_comp (C : Type z) [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] (f : B →ₐ[R] C) (g : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(mapAlgHom f).comp (mapAlgHom g) = mapAlgHom (f.comp g) := by
apply AlgHom.ext
intro x
simp [AlgHom.comp_algebraMap, map_map]
congr
theorem mapAlgHom_eq_eval₂AlgHom'_CAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : mapAlgHom f = eval₂AlgHom'
(CAlgHom.comp f) X (fun a => (commute_X (C (f a))).symm) := by
apply AlgHom.ext
intro x
congr
/-- If `A` and `B` are isomorphic as `R`-algebras, then so are their polynomial rings -/
def mapAlgEquiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : Polynomial A ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial B :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (mapAlgHom f.toAlgHom) (mapAlgHom f.symm.toAlgHom) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapAlgEquiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(mapAlgEquiv f) = map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_id : mapAlgEquiv (@AlgEquiv.refl R A _ _ _) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _x => map_id
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_coe_ringHom (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
↑(mapAlgEquiv f : _ ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial B) = (mapRingHom ↑f : Polynomial A →+* Polynomial B) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_toAlgHom (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
(mapAlgEquiv f : Polynomial A →ₐ[R] Polynomial B) = mapAlgHom f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_comp (C : Type*) [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) (g : B ≃ₐ[R] C) :
(mapAlgEquiv f).trans (mapAlgEquiv g) = mapAlgEquiv (f.trans g) := by
apply AlgEquiv.ext
intro x
simp [AlgEquiv.trans_apply, map_map]
congr
end Map
end CommSemiring
section aeval
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [CommSemiring A'] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {p q : R[X]} (x : A)
/-- Given a valuation `x` of the variable in an `R`-algebra `A`, `aeval R A x` is
the unique `R`-algebra homomorphism from `R[X]` to `A` sending `X` to `x`.
This is a stronger variant of the linear map `Polynomial.leval`. -/
def aeval : R[X] →ₐ[R] A :=
eval₂AlgHom' (Algebra.ofId _ _) x (Algebra.commutes · _)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {f g : R[X] →ₐ[R] B} (hX : f X = g X) :
f = g :=
algHom_ext' (Subsingleton.elim _ _) hX
theorem aeval_def (p : R[X]) : aeval x p = eval₂ (algebraMap R A) x p :=
rfl
theorem aeval_zero : aeval x (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
map_zero (aeval x)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_X : aeval x (X : R[X]) = x :=
eval₂_X _ x
@[simp]
theorem aeval_C (r : R) : aeval x (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
eval₂_C _ x
@[simp]
theorem aeval_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : aeval x (monomial n r) = algebraMap _ _ r * x ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
theorem aeval_X_pow {n : ℕ} : aeval x ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = x ^ n :=
eval₂_X_pow _ _
theorem aeval_add : aeval x (p + q) = aeval x p + aeval x q :=
map_add _ _ _
theorem aeval_one : aeval x (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
map_one _
theorem aeval_natCast (n : ℕ) : aeval x (n : R[X]) = n :=
map_natCast _ _
theorem aeval_mul : aeval x (p * q) = aeval x p * aeval x q :=
map_mul _ _ _
theorem comp_eq_aeval : p.comp q = aeval q p := rfl
theorem aeval_comp {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) :
aeval x (p.comp q) = aeval (aeval x q) p :=
eval₂_comp' x p q
/-- Two polynomials `p` and `q` such that `p(q(X))=X` and `q(p(X))=X`
induces an automorphism of the polynomial algebra. -/
@[simps!]
def algEquivOfCompEqX (p q : R[X]) (hpq : p.comp q = X) (hqp : q.comp p = X) : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[X] := by
refine AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (aeval p) (aeval q) ?_ ?_ <;>
exact AlgHom.ext fun _ ↦ by simp [← comp_eq_aeval, comp_assoc, hpq, hqp]
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfCompEqX_eq_iff (p q p' q' : R[X])
(hpq : p.comp q = X) (hqp : q.comp p = X) (hpq' : p'.comp q' = X) (hqp' : q'.comp p' = X) :
algEquivOfCompEqX p q hpq hqp = algEquivOfCompEqX p' q' hpq' hqp' ↔ p = p' :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using congr($h X), fun h ↦ by ext1; simp [h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfCompEqX_symm (p q : R[X]) (hpq : p.comp q = X) (hqp : q.comp p = X) :
(algEquivOfCompEqX p q hpq hqp).symm = algEquivOfCompEqX q p hqp hpq := rfl
/-- The automorphism of the polynomial algebra given by `p(X) ↦ p(a * X + b)`,
with inverse `p(X) ↦ p(a⁻¹ * (X - b))`. -/
@[simps!]
def algEquivCMulXAddC {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[X] :=
algEquivOfCompEqX (C a * X + C b) (C ⅟ a * (X - C b))
(by simp [← C_mul, ← mul_assoc]) (by simp [← C_mul, ← mul_assoc])
theorem algEquivCMulXAddC_symm_eq {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] :
(algEquivCMulXAddC a b).symm = algEquivCMulXAddC (⅟ a) (- ⅟ a * b) := by
ext p : 1
simp only [algEquivCMulXAddC_symm_apply, neg_mul, algEquivCMulXAddC_apply, map_neg, map_mul]
congr
simp [mul_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- The automorphism of the polynomial algebra given by `p(X) ↦ p(X+t)`,
with inverse `p(X) ↦ p(X-t)`. -/
@[simps!]
def algEquivAevalXAddC {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (t : R) : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[X] :=
algEquivOfCompEqX (X + C t) (X - C t) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem algEquivAevalXAddC_eq_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (t t' : R) :
algEquivAevalXAddC t = algEquivAevalXAddC t' ↔ t = t' := by
simp [algEquivAevalXAddC]
@[simp]
theorem algEquivAevalXAddC_symm {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (t : R) :
(algEquivAevalXAddC t).symm = algEquivAevalXAddC (-t) := by
simp [algEquivAevalXAddC, sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- The involutive automorphism of the polynomial algebra given by `p(X) ↦ p(-X)`. -/
@[simps!]
def algEquivAevalNegX {R : Type*} [CommRing R] : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[X] :=
algEquivOfCompEqX (-X) (-X) (by simp) (by simp)
theorem comp_neg_X_comp_neg_X {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
(p.comp (-X)).comp (-X) = p := by
rw [comp_assoc]
simp only [neg_comp, X_comp, neg_neg, comp_X]
theorem aeval_algHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (x : A) : aeval (f x) = f.comp (aeval x) :=
algHom_ext <| by simp only [aeval_X, AlgHom.comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem aeval_X_left : aeval (X : R[X]) = AlgHom.id R R[X] :=
algHom_ext <| aeval_X X
theorem aeval_X_left_apply (p : R[X]) : aeval X p = p :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (@aeval_X_left R _) p
theorem eval_unique (φ : R[X] →ₐ[R] A) (p) : φ p = eval₂ (algebraMap R A) (φ X) p := by
rw [← aeval_def, aeval_algHom, aeval_X_left, AlgHom.comp_id]
theorem aeval_algHom_apply {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B]
(f : F) (x : A) (p : R[X]) :
aeval (f x) p = f (aeval x p) := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on p (by simp [AlgHomClass.commutes]) (fun p q hp hq => ?_)
(by simp [AlgHomClass.commutes])
rw [map_add, hp, hq, ← map_add, ← map_add]
@[simp]
lemma coe_aeval_mk_apply {S : Subalgebra R A} (h : x ∈ S) :
(aeval (⟨x, h⟩ : S) p : A) = aeval x p :=
(aeval_algHom_apply S.val (⟨x, h⟩ : S) p).symm
theorem aeval_algEquiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) (x : A) : aeval (f x) = (f : A →ₐ[R] B).comp (aeval x) :=
aeval_algHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) x
theorem aeval_algebraMap_apply_eq_algebraMap_eval (x : R) (p : R[X]) :
aeval (algebraMap R A x) p = algebraMap R A (p.eval x) :=
aeval_algHom_apply (Algebra.ofId R A) x p
/-- Polynomial evaluation on a pair is a product of the evaluations on the components. -/
theorem aeval_prod (x : A × B) : aeval (R := R) x = (aeval x.1).prod (aeval x.2) :=
aeval_algHom (.fst R A B) x ▸ aeval_algHom (.snd R A B) x ▸
(aeval x).prod_comp (.fst R A B) (.snd R A B)
/-- Polynomial evaluation on a pair is a pair of evaluations. -/
theorem aeval_prod_apply (x : A × B) (p : Polynomial R) :
p.aeval x = (p.aeval x.1, p.aeval x.2) := by simp [aeval_prod]
section Pi
variable {I : Type*} {A : I → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (A i)] [∀ i, Algebra R (A i)]
variable (x : Π i, A i) (p : R[X])
/-- Polynomial evaluation on an indexed tuple is the indexed product of the evaluations
on the components.
Generalizes `Polynomial.aeval_prod` to indexed products. -/
theorem aeval_pi (x : Π i, A i) : aeval (R := R) x = Pi.algHom R A (fun i ↦ aeval (x i)) :=
(funext fun i ↦ aeval_algHom (Pi.evalAlgHom R A i) x) ▸
(Pi.algHom_comp R A (Pi.evalAlgHom R A) (aeval x))
theorem aeval_pi_apply₂ (j : I) : p.aeval x j = p.aeval (x j) :=
aeval_pi (R := R) x ▸ Pi.algHom_apply R A (fun i ↦ aeval (x i)) p j
/-- Polynomial evaluation on an indexed tuple is the indexed tuple of the evaluations
on the components.
Generalizes `Polynomial.aeval_prod_apply` to indexed products. -/
theorem aeval_pi_apply : p.aeval x = fun j ↦ p.aeval (x j) :=
funext fun j ↦ aeval_pi_apply₂ x p j
end Pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_aeval_eq_eval (r : R) : (aeval r : R[X] → R) = eval r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_aeval_eq_evalRingHom (x : R) :
((aeval x : R[X] →ₐ[R] R) : R[X] →+* R) = evalRingHom x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem aeval_fn_apply {X : Type*} (g : R[X]) (f : X → R) (x : X) :
((aeval f) g) x = aeval (f x) g :=
(aeval_algHom_apply (Pi.evalAlgHom R (fun _ => R) x) f g).symm
@[norm_cast]
theorem aeval_subalgebra_coe (g : R[X]) {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (s : Subalgebra R A)
(f : s) : (aeval f g : A) = aeval (f : A) g :=
(aeval_algHom_apply s.val f g).symm
theorem coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero (p : R[X]) : p.coeff 0 = aeval 0 p := by
simp [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero' (p : R[X]) : algebraMap R A (p.coeff 0) = aeval (0 : A) p := by
simp [aeval_def]
theorem map_aeval_eq_aeval_map {S T U : Type*} [Semiring S] [CommSemiring T] [Semiring U]
[Algebra R S] [Algebra T U] {φ : R →+* T} {ψ : S →+* U}
(h : (algebraMap T U).comp φ = ψ.comp (algebraMap R S)) (p : R[X]) (a : S) :
ψ (aeval a p) = aeval (ψ a) (p.map φ) := by
conv_rhs => rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map]
rw [map_map, h, ← map_map, eval_map, eval₂_at_apply, aeval_def, eval_map]
theorem aeval_eq_zero_of_dvd_aeval_eq_zero [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T] [Algebra S T]
{p q : S[X]} (h₁ : p ∣ q) {a : T} (h₂ : aeval a p = 0) : aeval a q = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map] at h₂ ⊢
exact eval_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval_eq_zero (Polynomial.map_dvd (algebraMap S T) h₁) h₂
section Semiring
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
theorem aeval_eq_sum_range [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (x : S) :
aeval x p = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), p.coeff i • x ^ i := by
simp_rw [Algebra.smul_def]
exact eval₂_eq_sum_range (algebraMap R S) x
theorem aeval_eq_sum_range' [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : S) :
aeval x p = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, p.coeff i • x ^ i := by
simp_rw [Algebra.smul_def]
exact eval₂_eq_sum_range' (algebraMap R S) hn x
theorem isRoot_of_eval₂_map_eq_zero (hf : Function.Injective f) {r : R} :
eval₂ f (f r) p = 0 → p.IsRoot r := by
intro h
apply hf
rw [← eval₂_hom, h, f.map_zero]
theorem isRoot_of_aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]}
(inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) {r : R} (hr : aeval (algebraMap R S r) p = 0) :
p.IsRoot r :=
isRoot_of_eval₂_map_eq_zero inj hr
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
section aevalTower
variable [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra S A'] [Algebra S B]
/-- Version of `aeval` for defining algebra homs out of `R[X]` over a smaller base ring
than `R`. -/
def aevalTower (f : R →ₐ[S] A') (x : A') : R[X] →ₐ[S] A' :=
eval₂AlgHom' f x fun _ => Commute.all _ _
variable (g : R →ₐ[S] A') (y : A')
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_X : aevalTower g y X = y :=
eval₂_X _ _
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_C (x : R) : aevalTower g y (C x) = g x :=
eval₂_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_comp_C : (aevalTower g y : R[X] →+* A').comp C = g :=
RingHom.ext <| aevalTower_C _ _
theorem aevalTower_algebraMap (x : R) : aevalTower g y (algebraMap R R[X] x) = g x :=
eval₂_C _ _
theorem aevalTower_comp_algebraMap : (aevalTower g y : R[X] →+* A').comp (algebraMap R R[X]) = g :=
aevalTower_comp_C _ _
theorem aevalTower_toAlgHom (x : R) : aevalTower g y (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom S R R[X] x) = g x :=
aevalTower_algebraMap _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_comp_toAlgHom : (aevalTower g y).comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom S R R[X]) = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective <| aevalTower_comp_algebraMap _ _
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_id : aevalTower (AlgHom.id S S) = aeval := by
ext s
simp only [eval_X, aevalTower_X, coe_aeval_eq_eval]
@[simp]
theorem aevalTower_ofId : aevalTower (Algebra.ofId S A') = aeval := by
ext
simp only [aeval_X, aevalTower_X]
end aevalTower
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}
theorem dvd_term_of_dvd_eval_of_dvd_terms {z p : S} {f : S[X]} (i : ℕ) (dvd_eval : p ∣ f.eval z)
(dvd_terms : ∀ j ≠ i, p ∣ f.coeff j * z ^ j) : p ∣ f.coeff i * z ^ i := by
by_cases hi : i ∈ f.support
· rw [eval, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_def] at dvd_eval
rw [← Finset.insert_erase hi, Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _)] at dvd_eval
refine (dvd_add_left ?_).mp dvd_eval
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro j hj
exact dvd_terms j (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hj)
· convert dvd_zero p
rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
simp [hi]
theorem dvd_term_of_isRoot_of_dvd_terms {r p : S} {f : S[X]} (i : ℕ) (hr : f.IsRoot r)
(h : ∀ j ≠ i, p ∣ f.coeff j * r ^ j) : p ∣ f.coeff i * r ^ i :=
dvd_term_of_dvd_eval_of_dvd_terms i (Eq.symm hr ▸ dvd_zero p) h
end CommRing
end aeval
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
| /-- The evaluation map is not generally multiplicative when the coefficient ring is noncommutative,
but nevertheless any polynomial of the form `p * (X - monomial 0 r)` is sent to zero
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/AlgebraMap.lean | 541 | 542 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Presheaf
/-!
# Presheafed spaces
Introduces the category of topological spaces equipped with a presheaf (taking values in an
arbitrary target category `C`.)
We further describe how to apply functors and natural transformations to the values of the
presheaves.
-/
open Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor TopCat TopologicalSpace
Topology
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.auto_cases_opens
-- We would replace this by:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opens
-- although it doesn't appear to help in this file, in any case.
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
-- A possible replacement would be:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opposite
-- but this would probably require https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop/issues/59
-- In any case, it doesn't seem necessary here.
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
-- Porting note: `PresheafSpace.{w} C` is the type of topological spaces in `Type w` equipped
-- with a presheaf with values in `C`; then there is a total of three universe parameters
-- in `PresheafSpace.{w, v, u} C`, where `C : Type u` and `Category.{v} C`.
-- In mathlib3, some definitions in this file unnecessarily assumed `w=v`. This restriction
-- has been removed.
/-- A `PresheafedSpace C` is a topological space equipped with a presheaf of `C`s. -/
structure PresheafedSpace where
carrier : TopCat
protected presheaf : carrier.Presheaf C
variable {C}
namespace PresheafedSpace
instance coeCarrier : CoeOut (PresheafedSpace C) TopCat where coe X := X.carrier
attribute [coe] PresheafedSpace.carrier
instance : CoeSort (PresheafedSpace C) Type* where coe X := X.carrier
instance (X : PresheafedSpace C) : TopologicalSpace X :=
X.carrier.str
/-- The constant presheaf on `X` with value `Z`. -/
def const (X : TopCat) (Z : C) : PresheafedSpace C where
carrier := X
presheaf := (Functor.const _).obj Z
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (PresheafedSpace C) :=
⟨const (TopCat.of PEmpty) default⟩
/-- A morphism between presheafed spaces `X` and `Y` consists of a continuous map
`f` between the underlying topological spaces, and a (notice contravariant!) map
from the presheaf on `Y` to the pushforward of the presheaf on `X` via `f`. -/
structure Hom (X Y : PresheafedSpace C) where
base : (X : TopCat) ⟶ (Y : TopCat)
c : Y.presheaf ⟶ base _* X.presheaf
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem Hom.ext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : Hom X Y) (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : α.c ≫ whiskerRight (eqToHom (by rw [w])) _ = β.c) : α = β := by
rcases α with ⟨base, c⟩
rcases β with ⟨base', c'⟩
dsimp at w
subst w
dsimp at h
erw [whiskerRight_id', comp_id] at h
subst h
rfl
-- TODO including `injections` would make tidy work earlier.
theorem hext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : Hom X Y) (w : α.base = β.base) (h : HEq α.c β.c) :
α = β := by
cases α
cases β
congr
/-- The identity morphism of a `PresheafedSpace`. -/
def id (X : PresheafedSpace C) : Hom X X where
base := 𝟙 (X : TopCat)
c := 𝟙 _
instance homInhabited (X : PresheafedSpace C) : Inhabited (Hom X X) :=
⟨id X⟩
/-- Composition of morphisms of `PresheafedSpace`s. -/
def comp {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : Hom X Y) (β : Hom Y Z) : Hom X Z where
base := α.base ≫ β.base
c := β.c ≫ (Presheaf.pushforward _ β.base).map α.c
| theorem comp_c {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : Hom X Y) (β : Hom Y Z) :
(comp α β).c = β.c ≫ (Presheaf.pushforward _ β.base).map α.c :=
rfl
variable (C)
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/PresheafedSpace.lean | 112 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Transvections
Transvections are matrices of the form `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`, where `stdBasisMatrix i j c`
is the basic matrix with a `c` at position `(i, j)`. Multiplying by such a transvection on the left
(resp. on the right) amounts to adding `c` times the `j`-th row to the `i`-th row
(resp `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column). Therefore, they are useful to present
algorithms operating on rows and columns.
Transvections are a special case of *elementary matrices* (according to most references, these also
contain the matrices exchanging rows, and the matrices multiplying a row by a constant).
We show that, over a field, any matrix can be written as `L * D * L'`, where `L` and `L'` are
products of transvections and `D` is diagonal. In other words, one can reduce a matrix to diagonal
form by operations on its rows and columns, a variant of Gauss' pivot algorithm.
## Main definitions and results
* `transvection i j c` is the matrix equal to `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`.
* `TransvectionStruct n R` is a structure containing the data of `i, j, c` and a proof that
`i ≠ j`. These are often easier to manipulate than straight matrices, especially in inductive
arguments.
* `exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec` states that any matrix `M` over a field can
be written in the form `t_1 * ... * t_k * D * t'_1 * ... * t'_l`, where `D` is diagonal and
the `t_i`, `t'_j` are transvections.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction` shows that a property which is true for diagonal matrices and
transvections, and invariant under product, is true for all matrices.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero` is the same statement over invertible matrices.
## Implementation details
The proof of the reduction results is done inductively on the size of the matrices, reducing an
`(r + 1) × (r + 1)` matrix to a matrix whose last row and column are zeroes, except possibly for
the last diagonal entry. This step is done as follows.
If all the coefficients on the last row and column are zero, there is nothing to do. Otherwise,
one can put a nonzero coefficient in the last diagonal entry by a row or column operation, and then
subtract this last diagonal entry from the other entries in the last row and column to make them
vanish.
This step is done in the type `Fin r ⊕ Unit`, where `Fin r` is useful to choose arbitrarily some
order in which we cancel the coefficients, and the sum structure is useful to use the formalism of
block matrices.
To proceed with the induction, we reindex our matrices to reduce to the above situation.
-/
universe u₁ u₂
namespace Matrix
variable (n p : Type*) (R : Type u₂) {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
variable [CommRing R]
section Transvection
variable {R n} (i j : n)
/-- The transvection matrix `transvection i j c` is equal to the identity plus `c` at position
`(i, j)`. Multiplying by it on the left (as in `transvection i j c * M`) corresponds to adding
`c` times the `j`-th row of `M` to its `i`-th row. Multiplying by it on the right corresponds
to adding `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column. -/
def transvection (c : R) : Matrix n n R :=
1 + Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c
@[simp]
theorem transvection_zero : transvection i j (0 : R) = 1 := by simp [transvection]
section
/-- A transvection matrix is obtained from the identity by adding `c` times the `j`-th row to
the `i`-th row. -/
theorem updateRow_eq_transvection [Finite n] (c : R) :
updateRow (1 : Matrix n n R) i ((1 : Matrix n n R) i + c • (1 : Matrix n n R) j) =
transvection i j c := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
ext a b
by_cases ha : i = a
· by_cases hb : j = b
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, transvection, add_apply, StdBasisMatrix.apply_same]
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, add_zero, transvection, add_apply, and_false, not_false_eq_true,
StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne]
· simp only [updateRow_ne, transvection, ha, Ne.symm ha, StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne, add_zero,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Ne, not_false_iff, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
mul_zero, false_and, add_apply]
variable [Fintype n]
theorem transvection_mul_transvection_same (h : i ≠ j) (c d : R) :
transvection i j c * transvection i j d = transvection i j (c + d) := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, Matrix.mul_add, h, h.symm, add_smul, add_assoc,
stdBasisMatrix_add]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_same (b : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) i b = M i b + c * M j b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_same (a : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a j = M a j + c * M a i := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (ha : a ≠ i) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, ha]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hb : b ≠ j) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, hb]
@[simp]
theorem det_transvection_of_ne (h : i ≠ j) (c : R) : det (transvection i j c) = 1 := by
rw [← updateRow_eq_transvection i j, det_updateRow_add_smul_self _ h, det_one]
end
variable (R n)
/-- A structure containing all the information from which one can build a nontrivial transvection.
This structure is easier to manipulate than transvections as one has a direct access to all the
relevant fields. -/
structure TransvectionStruct where
(i j : n)
| hij : i ≠ j
c : R
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Transvection.lean | 141 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
/-!
# Augmentation and truncation of `ℕ`-indexed (co)chain complexes.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits HomologicalComplex
universe v u
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V]
namespace ChainComplex
/-- The truncation of an `ℕ`-indexed chain complex,
deleting the object at `0` and shifting everything else down.
-/
@[simps]
def truncate [HasZeroMorphisms V] : ChainComplex V ℕ ⥤ ChainComplex V ℕ where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => C.X (i + 1)
d := fun i j => C.d (i + 1) (j + 1)
shape := fun i j w => C.shape _ _ <| by simpa }
map f := { f := fun i => f.f (i + 1) }
/-- There is a canonical chain map from the truncation of a chain map `C` to
the "single object" chain complex consisting of the truncated object `C.X 0` in degree 0.
The components of this chain map are `C.d 1 0` in degree 0, and zero otherwise.
-/
def truncateTo [HasZeroObject V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) :
truncate.obj C ⟶ (single₀ V).obj (C.X 0) :=
(toSingle₀Equiv (truncate.obj C) (C.X 0)).symm ⟨C.d 1 0, by simp⟩
-- PROJECT when `V` is abelian (but not generally?)
-- `[∀ n, Exact (C.d (n+2) (n+1)) (C.d (n+1) n)] [Epi (C.d 1 0)]` iff `QuasiIso (C.truncate_to)`
variable [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- We can "augment" a chain complex by inserting an arbitrary object in degree zero
(shifting everything else up), along with a suitable differential.
-/
def augment (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
ChainComplex V ℕ where
X | 0 => X
| i + 1 => C.X i
d | 1, 0 => f
| i + 1, j + 1 => C.d i j
| _, _ => 0
shape
| 1, 0, h => absurd rfl h
| _ + 2, 0, _ => rfl
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| i + 1, j + 1, h => by
simp only; exact C.shape i j (Nat.succ_ne_succ.1 h)
d_comp_d'
| _, _, 0, rfl, rfl => w
| _, _, k + 1, rfl, rfl => C.d_comp_d _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
(augment C f w).X 0 = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (augment C f w).X (i + 1) = C.X i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_one_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
(augment C f w).d 1 0 = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_succ_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i j : ℕ) : (augment C f w).d (i + 1) (j + 1) = C.d i j := by
cases i <;> rfl
/-- Truncating an augmented chain complex is isomorphic (with components the identity)
to the original complex.
-/
def truncateAugment (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0) :
truncate.obj (augment C f w) ≅ C where
hom := { f := fun _ => 𝟙 _ }
inv :=
{ f := fun _ => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
cases j <;>
· dsimp
simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext (_ | i) <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext (_ | i) <;>
· dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_hom_f (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).hom.f i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_inv_f (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : C.X 0 ⟶ X) (w : C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).inv.f i = 𝟙 ((truncate.obj (augment C f w)).X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem chainComplex_d_succ_succ_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) : C.d (i + 2) 0 = 0 := by
rw [C.shape]
exact i.succ_succ_ne_one.symm
/-- Augmenting a truncated complex with the original object and morphism is isomorphic
(with components the identity) to the original complex.
-/
def augmentTruncate (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) :
augment (truncate.obj C) (C.d 1 0) (C.d_comp_d _ _ _) ≅ C where
hom :=
{ f := fun | 0 => 𝟙 _ | _+1 => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
-- Porting note: was an rcases n with (_|_|n) but that was causing issues
match i with
| 0 | 1 | n+2 =>
rcases j with - | j <;> dsimp [augment, truncate] <;> simp
}
inv :=
{ f := fun | 0 => 𝟙 _ | _+1 => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
-- Porting note: was an rcases n with (_|_|n) but that was causing issues
match i with
| 0 | 1 | n+2 =>
rcases j with - | j <;> dsimp [augment, truncate] <;> simp
}
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem augmentTruncate_hom_f_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) :
(augmentTruncate C).hom.f 0 = 𝟙 (C.X 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augmentTruncate_hom_f_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) :
(augmentTruncate C).hom.f (i + 1) = 𝟙 (C.X (i + 1)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augmentTruncate_inv_f_zero (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) :
(augmentTruncate C).inv.f 0 = 𝟙 (C.X 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augmentTruncate_inv_f_succ (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) :
(augmentTruncate C).inv.f (i + 1) = 𝟙 (C.X (i + 1)) :=
rfl
/-- A chain map from a chain complex to a single object chain complex in degree zero
can be reinterpreted as a chain complex.
This is the inverse construction of `truncateTo`.
-/
def toSingle₀AsComplex [HasZeroObject V] (C : ChainComplex V ℕ) (X : V)
(f : C ⟶ (single₀ V).obj X) : ChainComplex V ℕ :=
let ⟨f, w⟩ := toSingle₀Equiv C X f
augment C f w
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
/-- The truncation of an `ℕ`-indexed cochain complex,
deleting the object at `0` and shifting everything else down.
-/
@[simps]
def truncate [HasZeroMorphisms V] : CochainComplex V ℕ ⥤ CochainComplex V ℕ where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => C.X (i + 1)
d := fun i j => C.d (i + 1) (j + 1)
shape := fun i j w => by
apply C.shape
simpa }
map f := { f := fun i => f.f (i + 1) }
/-- There is a canonical chain map from the truncation of a cochain complex `C` to
the "single object" cochain complex consisting of the truncated object `C.X 0` in degree 0.
The components of this chain map are `C.d 0 1` in degree 0, and zero otherwise.
-/
def toTruncate [HasZeroObject V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) :
(single₀ V).obj (C.X 0) ⟶ truncate.obj C :=
(fromSingle₀Equiv (truncate.obj C) (C.X 0)).symm ⟨C.d 0 1, by simp⟩
variable [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- We can "augment" a cochain complex by inserting an arbitrary object in degree zero
(shifting everything else up), along with a suitable differential.
-/
def augment (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
CochainComplex V ℕ where
X | 0 => X
| i + 1 => C.X i
d | 0, 1 => f
| i + 1, j + 1 => C.d i j
| _, _ => 0
shape i j s := by
simp? at s says simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel] at s
rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> cases i <;> try simp
· contradiction
· rw [C.shape]
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel]
contrapose! s
rw [← s]
d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk := by
rcases k with (_ | _ | k) <;> rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> cases i <;> try simp
cases k
· exact w
· rw [C.shape, comp_zero]
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel, zero_add]
exact (Nat.one_lt_succ_succ _).ne
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_zero (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
(augment C f w).X 0 = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_succ (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (augment C f w).X (i + 1) = C.X i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_zero_one (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
(augment C f w).d 0 1 = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_succ_succ (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0)
(i j : ℕ) : (augment C f w).d (i + 1) (j + 1) = C.d i j :=
rfl
/-- Truncating an augmented cochain complex is isomorphic (with components the identity)
to the original complex.
-/
def truncateAugment (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
truncate.obj (augment C f w) ≅ C where
hom := { f := fun _ => 𝟙 _ }
inv :=
{ f := fun _ => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
cases j <;>
· dsimp
simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_hom_f (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0)
(w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) (i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).hom.f i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_inv_f (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0)
(w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) (i : ℕ) :
(truncateAugment C f w).inv.f i = 𝟙 ((truncate.obj (augment C f w)).X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cochainComplex_d_succ_succ_zero (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) : C.d 0 (i + 2) = 0 := by
rw [C.shape]
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel, zero_add]
exact (Nat.one_lt_succ_succ _).ne
/-- Augmenting a truncated complex with the original object and morphism is isomorphic
(with components the identity) to the original complex.
-/
def augmentTruncate (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) :
augment (truncate.obj C) (C.d 0 1) (C.d_comp_d _ _ _) ≅ C where
hom :=
{ f := fun | 0 => 𝟙 _ | _+1 => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> cases i <;>
· dsimp
-- Porting note https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10959
-- simp can't handle this now but aesop does
aesop }
inv :=
{ f := fun | 0 => 𝟙 _ | _+1 => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> rcases i with - | i <;>
· dsimp
-- Porting note https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10959
-- simp can't handle this now but aesop does
aesop }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
| cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Augment.lean | 325 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.PeakFunction
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier inversion formula
In a finite-dimensional real inner product space, we show the Fourier inversion formula, i.e.,
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v = f v` if `f` and `𝓕 f` are integrable, and `f` is continuous at `v`. This is proved
in `MeasureTheory.Integrable.fourier_inversion`. See also `Continuous.fourier_inversion`
giving `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) = f` under an additional continuity assumption for `f`.
We use the following proof. A naïve computation gives
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) ∫_x, exp (-2 I π ⟪w, x⟫) f x dx) dw
= ∫_x (∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw) f x dx `
However, the Fubini step does not make sense for lack of integrability, and the middle integral
`∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw` (which one would like to be a Dirac at `v - x`) is not defined.
To gain integrability, one multiplies with a Gaussian function `exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2)`, with a large
(but finite) `c`. As this function converges pointwise to `1` when `c → ∞`, we get
`∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw = lim_c ∫_w exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw`.
One can perform Fubini on the right hand side for fixed `c`, writing the integral as
`∫_x (∫_w exp (-c⁻¹‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw)) f x dx`.
The middle factor is the Fourier transform of a more and more flat function
(converging to the constant `1`), hence it becomes more and more concentrated, around the
point `v`. (Morally, it converges to the Dirac at `v`). Moreover, it has integral one.
Therefore, multiplying by `f` and integrating, one gets a term converging to `f v` as `c → ∞`.
Since it also converges to `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v`, this proves the result.
To check the concentration property of the middle factor and the fact that it has integral one, we
rely on the explicit computation of the Fourier transform of Gaussians.
-/
open Filter MeasureTheory Complex Module Metric Real Bornology
open scoped Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace Complex
variable {V E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : V → E}
namespace Real
lemma tendsto_integral_cexp_sq_smul (hf : Integrable f) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ v : V, cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖v‖^2) • f v))
atTop (𝓝 (∫ v : V, f v)) := by
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence _ _ _ hf.norm
· filter_upwards with v
nth_rewrite 2 [show f v = cexp (- (0 : ℝ) * ‖v‖^2) • f v by simp]
apply (Tendsto.cexp _).smul_const
exact tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.ofReal.neg.mul_const _
· filter_upwards with c using
AEStronglyMeasurable.smul (Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable (by fun_prop)) hf.1
· filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with c (hc : 0 ≤ c)
filter_upwards with v
simp only [ofReal_inv, neg_mul, norm_smul]
norm_cast
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (‖f v‖)]
gcongr
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, exp_le_one_iff, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
positivity
variable [CompleteSpace E]
| lemma tendsto_integral_gaussian_smul (hf : Integrable f) (h'f : Integrable (𝓕 f)) (v : V) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦
∫ w : V, ((π * c) ^ (finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π ^ 2 * c * ‖v - w‖ ^ 2)) • f w)
atTop (𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ w : V, cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)
• (𝓕 f) w)) atTop (𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
have : Integrable (fun w ↦ 𝐞 ⟪w, v⟫ • (𝓕 f) w) := by
have B : Continuous fun p : V × V => (- innerₗ V) p.1 p.2 := continuous_inner.neg
simpa using
(VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff Real.continuous_fourierChar B v).2 h'f
convert tendsto_integral_cexp_sq_smul this using 4 with c w
· rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, smul_smul, ← Complex.exp_add, real_inner_comm]
congr 3
simp only [ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat]
ring
· simp [fourierIntegralInv_eq]
have B : Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ w : V,
𝓕 (fun w ↦ cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)) w • f w)) atTop
(𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
apply A.congr'
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with c (hc : 0 < c)
have J : Integrable (fun w ↦ cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)) :=
GaussianFourier.integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add (by simpa) _ _
simpa using (VectorFourier.integral_fourierIntegral_smul_eq_flip (L := innerₗ V)
Real.continuous_fourierChar continuous_inner J hf).symm
apply B.congr'
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with c (hc : 0 < c)
congr with w
rw [fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace' (by simpa)]
congr
· simp
· simp; ring
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/Inversion.lean | 71 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Regular
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Filters with a cardinal intersection property
In this file we define `CardinalInterFilter l c` to be the class of filters with the following
property: for any collection of sets `s ∈ l` with cardinality strictly less than `c`,
their intersection belongs to `l` as well.
# Main results
* `Filter.cardinalInterFilter_aleph0` establishes that every filter `l` is a
`CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₀`
* `CardinalInterFilter.toCountableInterFilter` establishes that every `CardinalInterFilter l c` with
`c > ℵ₀` is a `CountableInterFilter`.
* `CountableInterFilter.toCardinalInterFilter` establishes that every `CountableInterFilter l` is a
`CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₁`.
* `CardinalInterFilter.of_CardinalInterFilter_of_lt` establishes that we have
`CardinalInterFilter l c` → `CardinalInterFilter l a` for all `a < c`.
## Tags
filter, cardinal
-/
open Set Filter Cardinal
universe u
variable {ι : Type u} {α β : Type u} {c : Cardinal.{u}}
/-- A filter `l` has the cardinal `c` intersection property if for any collection
of less than `c` sets `s ∈ l`, their intersection belongs to `l` as well. -/
class CardinalInterFilter (l : Filter α) (c : Cardinal.{u}) : Prop where
/-- For a collection of sets `s ∈ l` with cardinality below c,
their intersection belongs to `l` as well. -/
cardinal_sInter_mem : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (#S < c) → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋂₀ S ∈ l
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem cardinal_sInter_mem {S : Set (Set α)} [CardinalInterFilter l c] (hSc : #S < c) :
⋂₀ S ∈ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l := ⟨fun hS _s hs => mem_of_superset hS (sInter_subset_of_mem hs),
CardinalInterFilter.cardinal_sInter_mem _ hSc⟩
/-- Every filter is a CardinalInterFilter with c = ℵ₀ -/
theorem _root_.Filter.cardinalInterFilter_aleph0 (l : Filter α) : CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₀ where
cardinal_sInter_mem := by
simp_all only [aleph_zero, lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite, setOf_mem_eq, sInter_mem,
implies_true, forall_const]
/-- Every CardinalInterFilter with c > ℵ₀ is a CountableInterFilter -/
theorem CardinalInterFilter.toCountableInterFilter (l : Filter α) [CardinalInterFilter l c]
(hc : ℵ₀ < c) : CountableInterFilter l where
countable_sInter_mem S hS a :=
CardinalInterFilter.cardinal_sInter_mem S (lt_of_le_of_lt (Set.Countable.le_aleph0 hS) hc) a
/-- Every CountableInterFilter is a CardinalInterFilter with c = ℵ₁ -/
instance CountableInterFilter.toCardinalInterFilter (l : Filter α) [CountableInterFilter l] :
CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₁ where
cardinal_sInter_mem S hS a :=
CountableInterFilter.countable_sInter_mem S ((countable_iff_lt_aleph_one S).mpr hS) a
theorem cardinalInterFilter_aleph_one_iff :
CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₁ ↔ CountableInterFilter l :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨fun S h a ↦
CardinalInterFilter.cardinal_sInter_mem S ((countable_iff_lt_aleph_one S).1 h) a⟩,
fun _ ↦ CountableInterFilter.toCardinalInterFilter l⟩
/-- Every CardinalInterFilter for some c also is a CardinalInterFilter for some a ≤ c -/
theorem CardinalInterFilter.of_cardinalInterFilter_of_le (l : Filter α) [CardinalInterFilter l c]
{a : Cardinal.{u}} (hac : a ≤ c) :
CardinalInterFilter l a where
cardinal_sInter_mem S hS a :=
CardinalInterFilter.cardinal_sInter_mem S (lt_of_lt_of_le hS hac) a
theorem CardinalInterFilter.of_cardinalInterFilter_of_lt (l : Filter α) [CardinalInterFilter l c]
{a : Cardinal.{u}} (hac : a < c) : CardinalInterFilter l a :=
CardinalInterFilter.of_cardinalInterFilter_of_le l (hac.le)
namespace Filter
variable [CardinalInterFilter l c]
|
theorem cardinal_iInter_mem {s : ι → Set α} (hic : #ι < c) :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ l := by
rw [← sInter_range _]
apply (cardinal_sInter_mem (lt_of_le_of_lt Cardinal.mk_range_le hic)).trans
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CardinalInter.lean | 90 | 94 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Constructors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Locally
/-!
# Properties of morphisms from properties of ring homs.
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms that come from properties
of ring homs. For `P` a property of ring homs, we have two ways of defining a property of scheme
morphisms:
Let `f : X ⟶ Y`,
- `targetAffineLocally (affineAnd P)`: the preimage of an affine open `U = Spec A` is affine
(`= Spec B`) and `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`. (in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/AffineAnd.lean`)
- `affineLocally P`: For each pair of affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ X` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`,
the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
For these notions to be well defined, we require `P` be a sufficient local property. For the former,
`P` should be local on the source (`RingHom.RespectsIso P`, `RingHom.LocalizationPreserves P`,
`RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan`), and `targetAffineLocally (affine_and P)` will be local on
the target.
For the latter `P` should be local on the target (`RingHom.PropertyIsLocal P`), and
`affineLocally P` will be local on both the source and the target.
We also provide the following interface:
## `HasRingHomProperty`
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q` on `Γ(f)`.
For `HasRingHomProperty P Q` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`:
`P f` if and only if `Q (f.appLE U V _)` for all affine `U : Opens Y` and `V : Opens X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_source_openCover`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop)` for an affine open cover `𝒰` of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_isAffine`:
If `X` and `Y` are affine, then `P f ↔ Q (f.appTop)`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.Spec_iff`:
`P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i) _)` for a family `U` of affine opens of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.of_isOpenImmersion`:
If `f` is an open immersion then `P f`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.isStableUnderBaseChange`:
If `Q` is stable under base change, then so is `P`.
We also provide the instances `P.IsMultiplicative`, `P.IsStableUnderComposition`,
`IsLocalAtTarget P`, `IsLocalAtSource P`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
universe u
open CategoryTheory Opposite TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace RingHom
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
theorem IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
(hP : IsStableUnderBaseChange P) (hP' : RespectsIso P)
{X Y S : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] [IsAffine S] (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S)
(H : P g.appTop.hom) : P (pullback.fst f g).appTop.hom := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): change `rw` to `erw`
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst AffineScheme.forgetToScheme (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g)]
rw [Scheme.comp_appTop, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map]
have := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop
(PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst AffineScheme.Γ.rightOp (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g))
simp only [AffineScheme.Γ, Functor.rightOp_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, unop_comp,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_obj, Scheme.Γ_obj, Functor.rightOp_map, Functor.comp_map,
Functor.op_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map, Scheme.Γ_map] at this
rw [← this, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso, ← pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso]
exact hP.pushout_inl _ hP' _ _ H
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")]
alias IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_app_top :=
IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
end RingHom
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
section affineLocally
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `sourceAffineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`
whenever `P` holds for the restriction of `f` on every affine open subset of `X`. -/
def sourceAffineLocally : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ f _ =>
∀ U : X.affineOpens, P (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top).hom
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `affineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y` if for each
affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ Y` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`, the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
Also see `affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le`. -/
abbrev affineLocally : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u} :=
targetAffineLocally (sourceAffineLocally P)
theorem sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).toProperty.RespectsIso := by
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
· introv H U
have : IsIso (e.hom.appLE (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (e.hom.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ ⊤ (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 le_top (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H ⟨_, U.prop.image_of_isOpenImmersion e.hom⟩
· introv H U
rw [Scheme.comp_appLE, CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_left_isIso]
exact H U
theorem affineLocally_respectsIso (h : RingHom.RespectsIso P) : (affineLocally P).RespectsIso :=
letI := sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h
inferInstance
open Scheme in
theorem sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(U : Y.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
@sourceAffineLocally P _ _ (f ∣_ U) hU ↔
∀ (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U), P (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
dsimp only [sourceAffineLocally]
simp only [morphismRestrict_appLE]
rw [(affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).forall_congr_left, Subtype.forall]
refine forall₂_congr fun V h ↦ ?_
have := (affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).apply_symm_apply ⟨V, h⟩
exact f.appLE_congr _ (Opens.ι_image_top _) congr($(this).1.1) (fun f => P f.hom)
theorem affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
affineLocally.{u} P f ↔
∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U.1), P (f.appLE U V e).hom :=
forall_congr' fun U ↦ sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict P f U U.2
theorem sourceAffineLocally_isLocal (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P)
(h₂ : RingHom.LocalizationAwayPreserves P) (h₃ : RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).IsLocal := by
constructor
· exact sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h₁
· intro X Y _ f r H
rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict]
intro U hU
have : X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U (by simp) r) = U := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, Opens.map_top, CommRingCat.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply]
rw [Scheme.basicOpen_res]
simpa using hU
rw [← f.appLE_congr _ rfl this (fun f => P f.hom),
IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2 _ r]
simp only [CommRingCat.hom_ofHom]
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) h₂
exact H U
· introv hs hs' U
apply h₃ _ _ hs
intro r
simp_rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict] at hs'
have := hs' r ⟨X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1), U.2.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1)⟩
(by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE])
rwa [IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2, CommRingCat.hom_ofHom,
← h₁.isLocalization_away_iff] at this
variable {P}
lemma affineLocally_le {Q : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(hPQ : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}, P f → Q f) :
affineLocally P ≤ affineLocally Q :=
fun _ _ _ hf U V ↦ hPQ (hf U V)
open RingHom
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open affine neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f`
over some basic open of `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.affineOpens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.affineOpens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁.1) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (r : Γ(Y, U₁)) (s : Γ(X, V₁)) (_ : x ∈ X.basicOpen s)
(e : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r),
P (f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r) (X.basicOpen s) e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, r', hBrr', hBfx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter U₁.2 U₂.2 (f.base x)
⟨hfx₁, e₂ hx₂⟩
have ha : IsAffineOpen (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) := V₂.2.basicOpen _
have hxa : x ∈ X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r') := by
simpa [Scheme.Hom.appLE, ← Scheme.preimage_basicOpen] using And.intro hx₂ (hBrr' ▸ hBfx)
obtain ⟨s, s', hBss', hBx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter V₁.2 ha x ⟨hx₁, hxa⟩
haveI := V₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')
haveI := U₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r'
haveI := ha.isLocalization_basicOpen s'
have ers : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r := by
rw [hBss', hBrr']
apply le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _)
simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]
have heq : f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen s') (hBrr' ▸ hBss' ▸ ers) =
f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) (by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]) ≫
CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _) := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, homOfLE_leOfHom, CommRingCat.comp_apply, Category.assoc]
congr
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
refine ⟨r, s, hBx, ers, ?_⟩
· rw [f.appLE_congr _ hBrr' hBss' (fun f => P f.hom), heq]
apply hPa _ s' _
rw [U₂.2.appLE_eq_away_map f V₂.2]
exact hPl _ _ _ _ h₂
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f` over some affine open
`U'` of `Y` (resp. `V'` of `X`) that is contained in `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_affineOpens_le_appLE_of_appLE
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.Opens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.Opens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (U' : Y.affineOpens) (V' : X.affineOpens) (_ : U'.1 ≤ U₁) (_ : V'.1 ≤ V₁) (_ : x ∈ V'.1)
(e : V'.1 ≤ f⁻¹ᵁ U'.1), P (f.appLE U' V' e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, hBr, hBfx⟩ := U₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨f.base x, hfx₁⟩ (e₂ hx₂)
obtain ⟨s, hBs, hBx⟩ := V₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨x, hx₁⟩ hx₂
obtain ⟨r', s', hBx', e', hf'⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine hPa hPl x
⟨Y.basicOpen r, U₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ U₂ ⟨X.basicOpen s, V₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ V₂ hBx hx₂ e₂ h₂ hBfx
exact ⟨⟨Y.basicOpen r', (U₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩,
⟨X.basicOpen s', (V₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩, le_trans (Y.basicOpen_le _) hBr,
le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _) hBs, hBx', e', hf'⟩
end affineLocally
/--
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q`.
To make the proofs easier, we state it instead as
1. `Q` is local (See `RingHom.PropertyIsLocal`)
2. `P f` if and only if `Q` holds for every `Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, V)` for all affine `U`, `V`.
See `HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`.
-/
class HasRingHomProperty (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u})
(Q : outParam (∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)) : Prop where
isLocal_ringHomProperty : RingHom.PropertyIsLocal Q
eq_affineLocally' : P = affineLocally Q
namespace HasRingHomProperty
variable (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}) {Q} [HasRingHomProperty P Q]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
lemma copy {P' : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}}
{Q' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(e : P = P') (e' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S), Q f ↔ Q' f) :
HasRingHomProperty P' Q' := by
subst e
have heq : @Q = @Q' := by
ext R S _ _ f
exact (e' f)
rw [← heq]
infer_instance
lemma eq_affineLocally : P = affineLocally Q := eq_affineLocally'
@[local instance]
lemma HasAffineProperty : HasAffineProperty P (sourceAffineLocally Q) where
isLocal_affineProperty := sourceAffineLocally_isLocal _
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).localizationAwayPreserves
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpan
eq_targetAffineLocally' := eq_affineLocally P
/- This is only `inferInstance` because of the `@[local instance]` on `HasAffineProperty` above. -/
instance (priority := 900) : IsLocalAtTarget P := inferInstance
theorem appLE (H : P f) (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e) : Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H
exact H _ _ _
theorem appTop (H : P f) [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] : Q f.appTop.hom := by
rw [Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE]
exact appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias app_top := appTop
include Q in
theorem comp_of_isOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion f] (H : P g) :
P (f ≫ g) := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H ⊢
intro U V e
have : IsIso (f.appLE (f ''ᵁ V) V.1 (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (f.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (f.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ _ (f ''ᵁ V) V.1
(Set.image_subset_iff.mpr e) (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp,
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H _ ⟨_, V.2.image_of_isOpenImmersion _⟩ _
variable {P f}
lemma iff_appLE : P f ↔ ∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e), Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le]
theorem of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y]
(𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (H : ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop.hom)) :
P f := by
rw [HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P)]
intro U
let S i : X.affineOpens := ⟨_, isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝒰.map i)⟩
induction U using of_affine_open_cover S 𝒰.iSup_opensRange with
| basicOpen U r H =>
simp_rw [Scheme.affineBasicOpen_coe,
← f.appLE_map (U := ⊤) le_top (homOfLE (X.basicOpen_le r)).op]
have := U.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r
exact (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget _ r _ H
| openCover U s hs H =>
apply (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpanTarget.ofIsLocalization
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso _ _ hs
rintro r
refine ⟨_, _, _, IsAffineOpen.isLocalization_basicOpen U.2 r, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map]
exact H r
| hU i =>
specialize H i
rw [← (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso _
((IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (𝒰.map i) (S i).1.ι
Subtype.range_coe.symm).inv.app _), ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, ← Scheme.comp_appTop,
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac_assoc, Scheme.comp_appTop,
Scheme.Opens.ι_appTop, Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map] at H
exact (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp H
theorem iff_of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y] (𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop).hom :=
⟨fun H i ↦ appTop P _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion P (𝒰.map i) f H), of_source_openCover 𝒰⟩
theorem iff_of_isAffine [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] :
P f ↔ Q (f.appTop).hom := by
rw [iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (Scheme.coverOfIsIso.{u} (𝟙 _))]
simp
theorem Spec_iff {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} {φ : R ⟶ S} :
P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ.hom := by
have H := (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P), ← H.cancel_right_isIso _ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).hom,
← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_naturality, CommRingCat.hom_comp, H.cancel_left_isIso]
theorem of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤)
(H : ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom) :
P f := by
have (i) : IsAffine ((X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU).obj i) := (U i).2
refine of_source_openCover (X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU) fun i ↦ ?_
simpa [Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE] using (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp (H i)
theorem iff_of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _ le_top, of_iSup_eq_top U hU⟩
instance : IsLocalAtSource P := by
apply HasAffineProperty.isLocalAtSource
intros X Y f _ 𝒰
simp_rw [← HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P),
iff_of_source_openCover 𝒰.affineRefinement.openCover,
fun i ↦ iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (f := 𝒰.map i ≫ f) (𝒰.obj i).affineCover]
simp [Scheme.OpenCover.affineRefinement, Sigma.forall]
lemma containsIdentities (hP : RingHom.ContainsIdentities Q) : P.ContainsIdentities where
id_mem X := by
rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro U
have : IsAffine (𝟙 X ⁻¹ᵁ U.1) := U.2
rw [morphismRestrict_id, iff_of_isAffine (P := P), Scheme.id_appTop]
apply hP
variable (P) in
open _root_.PrimeSpectrum in
lemma isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget
[IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtSource P] :
RingHom.PropertyIsLocal fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) := by
have hP : RingHom.RespectsIso (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) :=
RingHom.toMorphismProperty_respectsIso_iff.mpr
(inferInstanceAs (P.inverseImage Scheme.Spec).unop.RespectsIso)
constructor
· intro R S _ _ f r R' S' _ _ _ _ _ _ H
refine (RingHom.RespectsIso.isLocalization_away_iff hP ..).mp ?_
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) r)).mp (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict H (basicOpen r))
· intros R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtSource.of_openCover (Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop
(fun i : s ↦ (i : S)) (by simpa)).openCover
intro i
simp only [CommRingCat.coe_of, Set.setOf_mem_eq, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_obj, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_obj_carrier,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_map, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_map,
← Spec.map_comp]
exact H i
· intro R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtTarget.of_iSup_eq_top _ (PrimeSpectrum.iSup_basicOpen_eq_top_iff
(f := fun i : s ↦ (i : R)).mpr (by simpa))
intro i
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) i.1)).mpr (H i)
· intro R S T _ _ _ _ r _ f hf
have := AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion.of_isLocalization (S := T) r
show P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f ≫ CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _)))
rw [Spec.map_comp]
exact IsLocalAtSource.comp hf ..
open _root_.PrimeSpectrum in
variable (P) in
lemma of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget [IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtSource P] :
HasRingHomProperty P (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) where
isLocal_ringHomProperty :=
isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget P
eq_affineLocally' := by
let Q := affineLocally (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f)))
have : HasRingHomProperty Q (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) :=
⟨isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget P, rfl⟩
show P = Q
ext X Y f
wlog hY : ∃ R, Y = Spec R generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover (P := P) Y.affineCover,
IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover (P := Q) Y.affineCover]
refine forall_congr' fun _ ↦ this _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨S, rfl⟩ := hY
wlog hX : ∃ R, X = Spec R generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) X.affineCover,
IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := Q) X.affineCover]
refine forall_congr' fun _ ↦ this _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨R, rfl⟩ := hX
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ : ∃ φ, Spec.map φ = f := ⟨_, Spec.map_preimage _⟩
rw [HasRingHomProperty.Spec_iff (P := Q)]
rfl
lemma stalkwise {P} (hP : RingHom.RespectsIso P) :
HasRingHomProperty (stalkwise P) fun {_ S _ _} φ ↦
∀ (p : Ideal S) (_ : p.IsPrime), P (Localization.localRingHom _ p φ rfl) := by
have := stalkwiseIsLocalAtTarget_of_respectsIso hP
have := stalkwise_isLocalAtSource_of_respectsIso hP
convert of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget (P := AlgebraicGeometry.stalkwise P) with R S _ _ φ
exact (stalkwise_Spec_map_iff hP (CommRingCat.ofHom φ)).symm
lemma stableUnderComposition (hP : RingHom.StableUnderComposition Q) :
P.IsStableUnderComposition where
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg := by
wlog hZ : IsAffine Z generalizing X Y Z
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro U
rw [morphismRestrict_comp]
exact this _ _ (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hf _) (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hg _) U.2
wlog hY : IsAffine Y generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) (Y.affineCover.pullbackCover f)]
intro i
rw [← Scheme.Cover.pullbackHom_map_assoc]
exact this _ _ (IsLocalAtTarget.of_isPullback (.of_hasPullback _ _) hf)
(comp_of_isOpenImmersion _ _ _ hg) inferInstance
wlog hX : IsAffine X generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) X.affineCover]
intro i
rw [← Category.assoc]
exact this _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion _ _ _ hf) inferInstance
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at hf hg ⊢
exact hP _ _ hg hf
theorem of_comp
(H : ∀ {R S T : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing T],
∀ (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T), Q (g.comp f) → Q g)
| {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (h : P (f ≫ g)) : P f := by
wlog hZ : IsAffine Z generalizing X Y Z
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _
(g.preimage_iSup_eq_top (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top Z))]
intro U
have H := IsLocalAtTarget.restrict h U.1
rw [morphismRestrict_comp] at H
exact this H inferInstance
wlog hY : IsAffine Y generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top Y)]
intro U
have H := comp_of_isOpenImmersion P (f ⁻¹ᵁ U.1).ι (f ≫ g) h
rw [← morphismRestrict_ι_assoc] at H
exact this H inferInstance
wlog hY : IsAffine X generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top X)]
intro U
have H := comp_of_isOpenImmersion P U.1.ι (f ≫ g) h
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/RingHomProperties.lean | 476 | 493 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
| theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 110 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomologicalFunctor
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.ShiftSequence
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologySequenceLemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Refinements
/-!
# The mapping cone of a monomorphism, up to a quasi-isomophism
If `S` is a short exact short complex of cochain complexes in an abelian category,
we construct a quasi-isomorphism `descShortComplex S : mappingCone S.f ⟶ S.X₃`.
We obtain this by comparing the homology sequence of `S` and the homology
sequence of the homology functor on the homotopy category, applied to the
distinguished triangle attached to the mapping cone of `S.f`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category ComplexShape HomotopyCategory Limits
HomologicalComplex.HomologySequence Pretriangulated Preadditive
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Abelian C]
namespace CochainComplex
@[reassoc]
lemma homologySequenceδ_quotient_mapTriangle_obj
(T : Triangle (CochainComplex C ℤ)) (n₀ n₁ : ℤ) (h : n₀ + 1 = n₁) :
(homologyFunctor C (up ℤ) 0).homologySequenceδ
((quotient C (up ℤ)).mapTriangle.obj T) n₀ n₁ h =
(homologyFunctorFactors C (up ℤ) n₀).hom.app _ ≫
(HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor C (up ℤ) 0).shiftMap T.mor₃ n₀ n₁ (by omega) ≫
(homologyFunctorFactors C (up ℤ) n₁).inv.app _ := by
apply homologyFunctor_shiftMap
namespace mappingCone
variable (S : ShortComplex (CochainComplex C ℤ)) (hS : S.ShortExact)
/-- The canonical morphism `mappingCone S.f ⟶ S.X₃` when `S` is a short complex
of cochain complexes. -/
noncomputable def descShortComplex : mappingCone S.f ⟶ S.X₃ := desc S.f 0 S.g (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_descShortComplex : inr S.f ≫ descShortComplex S = S.g := by
| simp [descShortComplex]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/ShortExact.lean | 52 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file defines bundled ordered groups and develops a few basic results.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
/-
`NeZero` theory should not be needed at this point in the ordered algebraic hierarchy.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedAddMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelMonoid
[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] : IsOrderedCancelMonoid α where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
le_of_mul_le_mul_right a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrder LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrder
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_self_iff : a⁻¹ < a ↔ 1 < a := by simp [inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_self_iff : a ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_self_iff : a < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section NormNumLemmas
/- The following lemmas are stated so that the `norm_num` tactic can use them with the
expected signatures. -/
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_le_neg]
theorem inv_le_inv' : a ≤ b → b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_lt_neg]
theorem inv_lt_inv' : a < b → b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ :=
inv_lt_inv_iff.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_one_of_one_lt : 1 < a → a⁻¹ < 1 :=
inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_one_of_one_le : 1 ≤ a → a⁻¹ ≤ 1 :=
inv_le_one'.mpr
@[to_additive neg_nonneg_of_nonpos]
theorem one_le_inv_of_le_one : a ≤ 1 → 1 ≤ a⁻¹ :=
one_le_inv'.mpr
end NormNumLemmas
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 801 | 802 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
/-!
# Compositions
A composition of a natural number `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum
of positive integers. Combinatorially, it corresponds to a decomposition of `{0, ..., n-1}` into
non-empty blocks of consecutive integers, where the `iⱼ` are the lengths of the blocks.
This notion is closely related to that of a partition of `n`, but in a composition of `n` the
order of the `iⱼ`s matters.
We implement two different structures covering these two viewpoints on compositions. The first
one, made of a list of positive integers summing to `n`, is the main one and is called
`Composition n`. The second one is useful for combinatorial arguments (for instance to show that
the number of compositions of `n` is `2^(n-1)`). It is given by a subset of `{0, ..., n}`
containing `0` and `n`, where the elements of the subset (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost
points of each block. The main API is built on `Composition n`, and we provide an equivalence
between the two types.
## Main functions
* `c : Composition n` is a structure, made of a list of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
* `composition_card` states that the cardinality of `Composition n` is exactly
`2^(n-1)`, which is proved by constructing an equiv with `CompositionAsSet n` (see below), which
is itself in bijection with the subsets of `Fin (n-1)` (this holds even for `n = 0`, where `-` is
nat subtraction).
Let `c : Composition n` be a composition of `n`. Then
* `c.blocks` is the list of blocks in `c`.
* `c.length` is the number of blocks in the composition.
* `c.blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ` is the realization of `c.blocks` as a function on
`Fin c.length`. This is the main object when using compositions to understand the composition of
analytic functions.
* `c.sizeUpTo : ℕ → ℕ` is the sum of the size of the blocks up to `i`.;
* `c.embedding i : Fin (c.blocksFun i) → Fin n` is the increasing embedding of the `i`-th block in
`Fin n`;
* `c.index j`, for `j : Fin n`, is the index of the block containing `j`.
* `Composition.ones n` is the composition of `n` made of ones, i.e., `[1, ..., 1]`.
* `Composition.single n (hn : 0 < n)` is the composition of `n` made of a single block of size `n`.
Compositions can also be used to split lists. Let `l` be a list of length `n` and `c` a composition
of `n`.
* `l.splitWrtComposition c` is a list of lists, made of the slices of `l` corresponding to the
blocks of `c`.
* `join_splitWrtComposition` states that splitting a list and then joining it gives back the
original list.
* `splitWrtComposition_join` states that joining a list of lists, and then splitting it back
according to the right composition, gives back the original list of lists.
We turn to the second viewpoint on compositions, that we realize as a finset of `Fin (n+1)`.
`c : CompositionAsSet n` is a structure made of a finset of `Fin (n+1)` called `c.boundaries`
and proofs that it contains `0` and `n`. (Taking a finset of `Fin n` containing `0` would not
make sense in the edge case `n = 0`, while the previous description works in all cases).
The elements of this set (other than `n`) correspond to leftmost points of blocks.
Thus, there is an equiv between `Composition n` and `CompositionAsSet n`. We
only construct basic API on `CompositionAsSet` (notably `c.length` and `c.blocks`) to be able
to construct this equiv, called `compositionEquiv n`. Since there is a straightforward equiv
between `CompositionAsSet n` and finsets of `{1, ..., n-1}` (obtained by removing `0` and `n`
from a `CompositionAsSet` and called `compositionAsSetEquiv n`), we deduce that
`CompositionAsSet n` and `Composition n` are both fintypes of cardinality `2^(n - 1)`
(see `compositionAsSet_card` and `composition_card`).
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is in the construction of the composition of
formal multilinear series, and the proof that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The representation of a composition as a list is very handy as lists are very flexible and already
have a well-developed API.
## Tags
Composition, partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(combinatorics)>
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- A composition of `n` is a list of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
/-- List of positive integers summing to `n` -/
blocks : List ℕ
/-- Proof of positivity for `blocks` -/
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
/-- Proof that `blocks` sums to `n` -/
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
deriving DecidableEq
attribute [simp] Composition.blocks_sum
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n`, by seeing it as non-empty blocks of
consecutive integers in `{0, ..., n-1}`. We register every block by its left end-point, yielding
a finset containing `0`. As this does not make sense for `n = 0`, we add `n` to this finset, and
get a finset of `{0, ..., n}` containing `0` and `n`. This is the data in the structure
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n` as consecutive integers `{0, ..., n-1}` -/
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
/-- Proof that `0` is a member of `boundaries` -/
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
/-- Last element of the composition -/
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
deriving DecidableEq
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
attribute [simp] CompositionAsSet.zero_mem CompositionAsSet.getLast_mem
/-!
### Compositions
A composition of an integer `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum of
positive integers.
-/
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
/-- The length of a composition, i.e., the number of blocks in the composition. -/
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
/-- The blocks of a composition, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. When composing analytic
functions using compositions, this is the main player. -/
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
@[simp]
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
theorem blocks_le {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : i ≤ n := by
rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact List.le_sum_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) _)
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_le {n} (c : Composition n) (i : Fin c.length) :
c.blocksFun i ≤ n :=
c.blocks_le <| getElem_mem _
@[simp]
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
@[simp]
theorem blocks_eq_nil : c.blocks = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa using congr(List.sum $h)
· rintro rfl
rw [← length_eq_zero_iff, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact c.length_le
protected theorem length_eq_zero : c.length = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem length_pos_iff : 0 < c.length ↔ 0 < n := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_pos⟩ := length_pos_iff
/-- The sum of the sizes of the blocks in a composition up to `i`. -/
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_of_length_le h
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks[i] := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
/-- The `i`-th boundary of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of the `i`-th block. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
/-- The boundaries of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of all the blocks. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
/-- To `c : Composition n`, one can associate a `CompositionAsSet n` by registering the leftmost
point of each block, and adding a virtual point at the right of the last block. -/
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
/-- The canonical increasing bijection between `Fin (c.length + 1)` and `c.boundaries` is
exactly `c.boundary`. -/
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
/-- Embedding the `i`-th block of a composition (identified with `Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) into
`Fin n` at the relevant position. -/
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
/-- `index_exists` asserts there is some `i` with `j < c.sizeUpTo (i+1)`.
In the next definition `index` we use `Nat.find` to produce the minimal such index.
-/
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
/-- `c.index j` is the index of the block in the composition `c` containing `j`. -/
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
/-- Mapping an element `j` of `Fin n` to the element in the block containing it, identified with
`Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j))` through the canonical increasing bijection. -/
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
/-- The embeddings of different blocks of a composition are disjoint. -/
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff' {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ i = c.index j := by
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not]
intro h
exact Set.disjoint_right.1 (c.disjoint_range h) (c.mem_range_embedding j)
· intro h
rw [h]
exact c.mem_range_embedding j
theorem index_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
c.index (c.embedding i j) = i := by
symm
rw [← mem_range_embedding_iff']
apply Set.mem_range_self
theorem invEmbedding_comp (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.invEmbedding (c.embedding i j) : ℕ) = j := by
simp_rw [coe_invEmbedding, index_embedding, coe_embedding, add_tsub_cancel_left]
/-- Equivalence between the disjoint union of the blocks (each of them seen as
`Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) with `Fin n`. -/
def blocksFinEquiv : (Σi : Fin c.length, Fin (c.blocksFun i)) ≃ Fin n where
toFun x := c.embedding x.1 x.2
invFun j := ⟨c.index j, c.invEmbedding j⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨i, y⟩
dsimp
congr; · exact c.index_embedding _ _
rw [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
· exact c.invEmbedding_comp _ _
· rw [c.index_embedding]
right_inv j := c.embedding_comp_inv j
theorem blocksFun_congr {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (c₁ : Composition n₁) (c₂ : Composition n₂) (i₁ : Fin c₁.length)
(i₂ : Fin c₂.length) (hn : n₁ = n₂) (hc : c₁.blocks = c₂.blocks) (hi : (i₁ : ℕ) = i₂) :
c₁.blocksFun i₁ = c₂.blocksFun i₂ := by
cases hn
rw [← Composition.ext_iff] at hc
cases hc
congr
rwa [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- Two compositions (possibly of different integers) coincide if and only if they have the
same sequence of blocks. -/
theorem sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq {c : Σ n, Composition n} {c' : Σ n, Composition n} :
c = c' ↔ c.2.blocks = c'.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases c with ⟨n, c⟩
rcases c' with ⟨n', c'⟩
have : n = n' := by rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← c'.blocks_sum, H]
induction this
congr
ext1
exact H
/-! ### The composition `Composition.ones` -/
/-- The composition made of blocks all of size `1`. -/
def ones (n : ℕ) : Composition n :=
⟨replicate n (1 : ℕ), fun {i} hi => by simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hi], by simp⟩
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (Composition n) :=
⟨Composition.ones n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ones_length (n : ℕ) : (ones n).length = n :=
List.length_replicate
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocks (n : ℕ) : (ones n).blocks = replicate n (1 : ℕ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocksFun (n : ℕ) (i : Fin (ones n).length) : (ones n).blocksFun i = 1 := by
simp only [blocksFun, ones, get_eq_getElem, getElem_replicate]
@[simp]
theorem ones_sizeUpTo (n : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : (ones n).sizeUpTo i = min i n := by
simp [sizeUpTo, ones_blocks, take_replicate]
@[simp]
theorem ones_embedding (i : Fin (ones n).length) (h : 0 < (ones n).blocksFun i) :
(ones n).embedding i ⟨0, h⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (ones n).length_le⟩ := by
ext
simpa using i.2.le
theorem eq_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ ∀ i ∈ c.blocks, i = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact fun i => eq_of_mem_replicate
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks = replicate c.blocks.length 1 := eq_replicate_of_mem H
have : c.blocks.length = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, A]
simp
rw [A, this, ones_blocks]
theorem ne_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c ≠ ones n ↔ ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := by
refine (not_congr eq_ones_iff).trans ?_
have : ∀ j ∈ c.blocks, j = 1 ↔ j ≤ 1 := fun j hj => by simp [le_antisymm_iff, c.one_le_blocks hj]
simp +contextual [this]
theorem eq_ones_iff_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ c.length = n := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ones_length n
· contrapose
intro H length_n
apply lt_irrefl n
calc
n = ∑ i : Fin c.length, 1 := by simp [length_n]
_ < ∑ i : Fin c.length, c.blocksFun i := by
{
obtain ⟨i, hi, i_blocks⟩ : ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := ne_ones_iff.1 H
rw [← ofFn_blocksFun, mem_ofFn' c.blocksFun, Set.mem_range] at hi
obtain ⟨j : Fin c.length, hj : c.blocksFun j = i⟩ := hi
rw [← hj] at i_blocks
exact Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => one_le_blocksFun c i) ⟨j, Finset.mem_univ _, i_blocks⟩
}
_ = n := c.sum_blocksFun
theorem eq_ones_iff_le_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ n ≤ c.length := by
simp [eq_ones_iff_length, le_antisymm_iff, c.length_le]
/-! ### The composition `Composition.single` -/
/-- The composition made of a single block of size `n`. -/
def single (n : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) : Composition n :=
⟨[n], by simp [h], by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem single_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).length = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem single_blocks {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).blocks = [n] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem single_blocksFun {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin (single n h).length) :
(single n h).blocksFun i = n := by simp [blocksFun, single, blocks, i.2]
@[simp]
theorem single_embedding {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin n) :
((single n h).embedding (0 : Fin 1)) i = i := by
ext
simp
theorem eq_single_iff_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c = single n h ↔ c.length = 1 := by
constructor
· intro H
rw [H]
exact single_length h
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks.length = 1 := H ▸ c.blocks_length
have B : c.blocks.sum = n := c.blocks_sum
rw [eq_cons_of_length_one A] at B ⊢
simpa [single_blocks] using B
theorem ne_single_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c ≠ single n hn ↔ ∀ i, c.blocksFun i < n := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨⟨0, by simp⟩, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [eq_single_iff_length]
have : ∀ j : Fin c.length, j = i := by
intro j
by_contra ji
apply lt_irrefl (∑ k, c.blocksFun k)
calc
∑ k, c.blocksFun k ≤ c.blocksFun i := by simp only [c.sum_blocksFun, hi]
_ < ∑ k, c.blocksFun k :=
Finset.single_lt_sum ji (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) (c.one_le_blocksFun j)
fun _ _ _ => zero_le _
simpa using Fintype.card_eq_one_of_forall_eq this
variable {m : ℕ}
/-- Change `n` in `(c : Composition n)` to a propositionally equal value. -/
@[simps]
protected def cast (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) : Composition n where
__ := c
blocks_sum := c.blocks_sum.trans hmn
@[simp]
theorem cast_rfl (c : Composition n) : c.cast rfl = c := rfl
theorem cast_heq (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) : HEq (c.cast hmn) c := by subst m; rfl
theorem cast_eq_cast (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) :
c.cast hmn = cast (hmn ▸ rfl) c := by
| subst m
rfl
/-- Append two compositions to get a composition of the sum of numbers. -/
@[simps]
def append (c₁ : Composition m) (c₂ : Composition n) : Composition (m + n) where
blocks := c₁.blocks ++ c₂.blocks
blocks_pos := by
intro i hi
rw [mem_append] at hi
exact hi.elim c₁.blocks_pos c₂.blocks_pos
blocks_sum := by simp
/-- Reverse the order of blocks in a composition. -/
@[simps]
def reverse (c : Composition n) : Composition n where
blocks := c.blocks.reverse
blocks_pos hi := c.blocks_pos (mem_reverse.mp hi)
blocks_sum := by simp [List.sum_reverse]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 591 | 610 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
| have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 84 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 1,606 | 1,608 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Composition
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions
In this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then
`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.
For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.
To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.compAlongComposition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : Composition N`.
To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `Composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.
## Main results
* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
`q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `AnalyticAt.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
* `FormalMultilinearSeries.comp_assoc` states that composition is associative on formal
multilinear series.
## Implementation details
The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.compAlongComposition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `Composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, Composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `Composition`.
The associativity of composition on formal multilinear series is a nontrivial result: it does not
follow from the associativity of composition of analytic functions, as there is no uniqueness for
the formal multilinear series representing a function (and also, it holds even when the radius of
convergence of the series is `0`). Instead, we give a direct proof, which amounts to reordering
double sums in a careful way. The change of variables is a canonical (combinatorial) bijection
`Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi` between `(Σ (a : Composition n), Composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : Composition n), Π (i : Fin c.length), Composition (c.blocksFun i))`, and is described
in more details below in the paragraph on associativity.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E F G H : Type*}
open Filter List
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal
section Topological
variable [CommRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace G]
/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]
/-!
In this paragraph, we define the composition of formal multilinear series, by summing over all
possible compositions of `n`.
-/
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `Fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.applyComposition c v i` for `v : Fin n → E` and `i : Fin c.length`. -/
def applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n) :
(Fin n → E) → Fin c.length → F := fun v i => p (c.blocksFun i) (v ∘ c.embedding i)
theorem applyComposition_ones (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
p.applyComposition (Composition.ones n) = fun v i =>
p 1 fun _ => v (Fin.castLE (Composition.length_le _) i) := by
funext v i
apply p.congr (Composition.ones_blocksFun _ _)
intro j hjn hj1
obtain rfl : j = 0 := by omega
refine congr_arg v ?_
rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.coe_castLE, Composition.ones_embedding, Fin.val_mk]
theorem applyComposition_single (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(v : Fin n → E) : p.applyComposition (Composition.single n hn) v = fun _j => p n v := by
ext j
refine p.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
dsimp
congr 1
convert Composition.single_embedding hn ⟨i, hi2⟩ using 1
obtain ⟨j_val, j_property⟩ := j
have : j_val = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 j_property)
congr!
simp
@[simp]
theorem removeZero_applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ}
(c : Composition n) : p.removeZero.applyComposition c = p.applyComposition c := by
ext v i
simp [applyComposition, zero_lt_one.trans_le (c.one_le_blocksFun i), removeZero_of_pos]
/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.applyComposition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `applyComposition` retain
multilinearity. -/
theorem applyComposition_update (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
(j : Fin n) (v : Fin n → E) (z : E) :
p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =
Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)
(p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))
(Function.update (v ∘ c.embedding (c.index j)) (c.invEmbedding j) z)) := by
ext k
by_cases h : k = c.index j
· rw [h]
let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
simp only [Function.update_self]
change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
let j' := c.invEmbedding j
suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
convert C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
· simp only [h, Function.update_eq_self, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range
rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMap_applyComposition {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(f : E →L[𝕜] F) (c : Composition n) (v : Fin n → E) :
(p.compContinuousLinearMap f).applyComposition c v = p.applyComposition c (f ∘ v) := by
simp (config := {unfoldPartialApp := true}) [applyComposition]; rfl
end FormalMultilinearSeries
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
open FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and a continuous multilinear
map `f` in `c.length` variables, one may form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by
applying the right coefficient of `p` to each block of the composition, and then applying `f` to
the resulting vector. It is called `f.compAlongComposition p c`. -/
def compAlongComposition {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) : E [×n]→L[𝕜] G where
toMultilinearMap :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun v ↦ f (p.applyComposition c v))
(fun v i x y ↦ by simp only [applyComposition_update, map_update_add])
(fun v i c x ↦ by simp only [applyComposition_update, map_update_smul])
cont :=
f.cont.comp <|
continuous_pi fun _ => (coe_continuous _).comp <| continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_apply _
@[simp]
theorem compAlongComposition_apply {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) (v : Fin n → E) :
(f.compAlongComposition p c) v = f (p.applyComposition c v) :=
rfl
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]
/-- Given two formal multilinear series `q` and `p` and a composition `c` of `n`, one may
form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by applying the right coefficient of `p` to each
block of the composition, and then applying `q c.length` to the resulting vector. It is
called `q.compAlongComposition p c`. -/
def compAlongComposition {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) : (E [×n]→L[𝕜] G) :=
(q c.length).compAlongComposition p c
@[simp]
theorem compAlongComposition_apply {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) (v : Fin n → E) :
(q.compAlongComposition p c) v = q c.length (p.applyComposition c v) :=
rfl
/-- Formal composition of two formal multilinear series. The `n`-th coefficient in the composition
is defined to be the sum of `q.compAlongComposition p c` over all compositions of
`n`. In other words, this term (as a multilinear function applied to `v_0, ..., v_{n-1}`) is
`∑'_{k} ∑'_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} qₖ (p_{i_1} (...), ..., p_{i_k} (...))`, where one puts all variables
`v_0, ..., v_{n-1}` in increasing order in the dots.
In general, the composition `q ∘ p` only makes sense when the constant coefficient of `p` vanishes.
We give a general formula but which ignores the value of `p 0` instead.
-/
protected def comp (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E G := fun n => ∑ c : Composition n, q.compAlongComposition p c
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. Since these maps are multilinear maps in zero
variables, but on different spaces, we can not state this directly, so we state it when applied to
arbitrary vectors (which have to be the zero vector). -/
theorem comp_coeff_zero (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 0 → E) (v' : Fin 0 → F) : (q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 v' := by
let c : Composition 0 := Composition.ones 0
dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
have : {c} = (Finset.univ : Finset (Composition 0)) := by
apply Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le <;> simp [Finset.card_univ, composition_card 0]
rw [← this, Finset.sum_singleton, compAlongComposition_apply]
symm; congr! -- Porting note: needed the stronger `congr!`!
@[simp]
theorem comp_coeff_zero' (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : (q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 fun _i => 0 :=
q.comp_coeff_zero p v _
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. When `p` goes from `E` to `E`, this can be
expressed as a direct equality -/
theorem comp_coeff_zero'' (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E E) :
(q.comp p) 0 = q 0 := by ext v; exact q.comp_coeff_zero p _ _
/-- The first coefficient of a composition of formal multilinear series is the composition of the
first coefficients seen as continuous linear maps. -/
theorem comp_coeff_one (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 1 → E) : (q.comp p) 1 v = q 1 fun _i => p 1 v := by
have : {Composition.ones 1} = (Finset.univ : Finset (Composition 1)) :=
Finset.eq_univ_of_card _ (by simp [composition_card])
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp, compAlongComposition_apply, ← this,
Finset.sum_singleton]
refine q.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
simp only [applyComposition_ones]
exact p.congr rfl fun j _hj1 hj2 => by congr! -- Porting note: needed the stronger `congr!`
/-- Only `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` depends on `q 0`. -/
theorem removeZero_comp_of_pos (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
q.removeZero.comp p n = q.comp p n := by
ext v
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp, compAlongComposition,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compAlongComposition_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.sum_apply]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun c _hc => ?_
rw [removeZero_of_pos _ (c.length_pos_of_pos hn)]
@[simp]
theorem comp_removeZero (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
q.comp p.removeZero = q.comp p := by ext n; simp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
end FormalMultilinearSeries
end Topological
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup H]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
/-- The norm of `f.compAlongComposition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `f` and `p`. -/
theorem compAlongComposition_bound {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) (v : Fin n → E) :
‖f.compAlongComposition p c v‖ ≤ (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖v i‖ :=
calc
‖f.compAlongComposition p c v‖ = ‖f (p.applyComposition c v)‖ := rfl
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.applyComposition c v i‖ := ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖ * ∏ j : Fin (c.blocksFun i), ‖(v ∘ c.embedding i) j‖ := by
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)
refine Finset.prod_le_prod (fun i _hi => norm_nonneg _) fun i _hi => ?_
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm
_ = (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) *
∏ i, ∏ j : Fin (c.blocksFun i), ‖(v ∘ c.embedding i) j‖ := by
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖v i‖ := by
rw [← c.blocksFinEquiv.prod_comp, ← Finset.univ_sigma_univ, Finset.prod_sigma]
congr
/-- The norm of `q.compAlongComposition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `q` and `p`. -/
theorem compAlongComposition_norm {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) :
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖ ≤ ‖q c.length‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖ :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) (compAlongComposition_bound _ _ _)
theorem compAlongComposition_nnnorm {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) :
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖₊ ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe]; push_cast; exact q.compAlongComposition_norm p c
/-!
### The identity formal power series
We will now define the identity power series, and show that it is a neutral element for left and
right composition.
-/
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- The identity formal multilinear series, with all coefficients equal to `0` except for `n = 1`
where it is (the continuous multilinear version of) the identity. We allow an arbitrary
constant coefficient `x`. -/
def id (x : E) : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E E
| 0 => ContinuousMultilinearMap.uncurry0 𝕜 _ x
| 1 => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E E).symm (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E)
| _ => 0
@[simp] theorem id_apply_zero (x : E) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
(FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) 0 v = x := rfl
/-- The first coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_one (x : E) (v : Fin 1 → E) : (FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) 1 v = v 0 :=
rfl
/-- The `n`th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity when `n = 1`. We state this in a dependent
way, as it will often appear in this form. -/
theorem id_apply_one' (x : E) {n : ℕ} (h : n = 1) (v : Fin n → E) :
(id 𝕜 E x) n v = v ⟨0, h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one⟩ := by
subst n
apply id_apply_one
/-- For `n ≠ 1`, the `n`-th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is zero, by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_of_one_lt (x : E) {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) :
(FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) n = 0 := by
match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| 1 => contradiction
| n + 2 => rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : p.comp (id 𝕜 E x) = p := by
ext1 n
dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (Composition.ones n)]
· show compAlongComposition p (id 𝕜 E x) (Composition.ones n) = p n
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply]
apply p.congr (Composition.ones_length n)
intros
rw [applyComposition_ones]
refine congr_arg v ?_
rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.coe_castLE, Fin.val_mk]
· show
∀ b : Composition n,
b ∈ Finset.univ → b ≠ Composition.ones n → compAlongComposition p (id 𝕜 E x) b = 0
intro b _ hb
obtain ⟨k, hk, lt_k⟩ : ∃ (k : ℕ), k ∈ Composition.blocks b ∧ 1 < k :=
Composition.ne_ones_iff.1 hb
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin b.blocks.length), b.blocks[i] = k :=
List.get_of_mem hk
let j : Fin b.length := ⟨i.val, b.blocks_length ▸ i.prop⟩
have A : 1 < b.blocksFun j := by convert lt_k
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero _ j
dsimp [applyComposition]
rw [id_apply_of_one_lt _ _ _ A, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (v0 : Fin 0 → E) :
(id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)).comp p = p := by
ext1 n
obtain rfl | n_pos := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· ext v
simp only [comp_coeff_zero', id_apply_zero]
congr with i
exact i.elim0
· dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (Composition.single n n_pos)]
· show compAlongComposition (id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)) p (Composition.single n n_pos) = p n
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, id_apply_one' _ _ _ (Composition.single_length n_pos)]
dsimp [applyComposition]
refine p.congr rfl fun i him hin => congr_arg v <| ?_
ext; simp
· show
∀ b : Composition n, b ∈ Finset.univ → b ≠ Composition.single n n_pos →
compAlongComposition (id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)) p b = 0
intro b _ hb
have A : 1 < b.length := by
have : b.length ≠ 1 := by simpa [Composition.eq_single_iff_length] using hb
have : 0 < b.length := Composition.length_pos_of_pos b n_pos
omega
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, id_apply_of_one_lt _ _ _ A,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
· simp
/-- Variant of `id_comp` in which the zero coefficient is given by an equality hypothesis instead
of a definitional equality. Useful for rewriting or simplifying out in some situations. -/
theorem id_comp' (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : F) (v0 : Fin 0 → E) (h : x = p 0 v0) :
(id 𝕜 F x).comp p = p := by
simp [h]
/-! ### Summability properties of the composition of formal power series -/
section
/-- If two formal multilinear series have positive radius of convergence, then the terms appearing
in the definition of their composition are also summable (when multiplied by a suitable positive
geometric term). -/
theorem comp_summable_nnreal (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hq : 0 < q.radius) (hp : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ r > (0 : ℝ≥0),
Summable fun i : Σ n, Composition n => ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1 := by
/- This follows from the fact that the growth rate of `‖qₙ‖` and `‖pₙ‖` is at most geometric,
giving a geometric bound on each `‖q.compAlongComposition p op‖`, together with the
fact that there are `2^(n-1)` compositions of `n`, giving at most a geometric loss. -/
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min zero_lt_one hq) with ⟨rq, rq_pos, hrq⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min zero_lt_one hp) with ⟨rp, rp_pos, hrp⟩
simp only [lt_min_iff, ENNReal.coe_lt_one_iff, ENNReal.coe_pos] at hrp hrq rp_pos rq_pos
obtain ⟨Cq, _hCq0, hCq⟩ : ∃ Cq > 0, ∀ n, ‖q n‖₊ * rq ^ n ≤ Cq :=
q.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrq.2
obtain ⟨Cp, hCp1, hCp⟩ : ∃ Cp ≥ 1, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * rp ^ n ≤ Cp := by
rcases p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrp.2 with ⟨Cp, -, hCp⟩
exact ⟨max Cp 1, le_max_right _ _, fun n => (hCp n).trans (le_max_left _ _)⟩
let r0 : ℝ≥0 := (4 * Cp)⁻¹
have r0_pos : 0 < r0 := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos zero_lt_four (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1))
set r : ℝ≥0 := rp * rq * r0
have r_pos : 0 < r := mul_pos (mul_pos rp_pos rq_pos) r0_pos
have I :
∀ i : Σ n : ℕ, Composition n, ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1 ≤ Cq / 4 ^ i.1 := by
rintro ⟨n, c⟩
have A := calc
‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ c.length :=
mul_le_mul' le_rfl (pow_le_pow_of_le_one rq.2 hrq.1.le c.length_le)
_ ≤ Cq := hCq _
have B := calc
(∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n = ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊ * rp ^ c.blocksFun i := by
simp only [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, c.sum_blocksFun]
_ ≤ ∏ _i : Fin c.length, Cp := Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => hCp _
_ = Cp ^ c.length := by simp
_ ≤ Cp ^ n := pow_right_mono₀ hCp1 c.length_le
calc
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖₊ * r ^ n ≤
(‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * r ^ n :=
mul_le_mul' (q.compAlongComposition_nnnorm p c) le_rfl
_ = ‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n * ((∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n) * r0 ^ n := by
ring
_ ≤ Cq * Cp ^ n * r0 ^ n := mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' A B) le_rfl
_ = Cq / 4 ^ n := by
simp only [r0]
field_simp [mul_pow, (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1).ne']
ring
refine ⟨r, r_pos, NNReal.summable_of_le I ?_⟩
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine Summable.mul_left _ ?_
have : ∀ n : ℕ, HasSum (fun c : Composition n => (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) (2 ^ (n - 1) / 4 ^ n) := by
intro n
convert hasSum_fintype fun c : Composition n => (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹
simp [Finset.card_univ, composition_card, div_eq_mul_inv]
refine NNReal.summable_sigma.2 ⟨fun n => (this n).summable, (NNReal.summable_nat_add_iff 1).1 ?_⟩
convert (NNReal.summable_geometric (NNReal.div_lt_one_of_lt one_lt_two)).mul_left (1 / 4) using 1
ext1 n
rw [(this _).tsum_eq, add_tsub_cancel_right]
field_simp [← mul_assoc, pow_succ, mul_pow, show (4 : ℝ≥0) = 2 * 2 by norm_num,
mul_right_comm]
end
/-- Bounding below the radius of the composition of two formal multilinear series assuming
summability over all compositions. -/
theorem le_comp_radius_of_summable (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (r : ℝ≥0)
(hr : Summable fun i : Σ n, Composition n => ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (q.comp p).radius := by
refine
le_radius_of_bound_nnreal _
(∑' i : Σ n, Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst) fun n => ?_
calc
‖FormalMultilinearSeries.comp q p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤
∑' c : Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p c‖₊ * r ^ n := by
rw [tsum_fintype, ← Finset.sum_mul]
exact mul_le_mul' (nnnorm_sum_le _ _) le_rfl
_ ≤ ∑' i : Σ n : ℕ, Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst :=
NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hr sigma_mk_injective
/-!
### Composing analytic functions
Now, we will prove that the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` up to order `N` is
given by a sum over some large subset of `Σ n, Composition n` of `q.compAlongComposition p`, to
deduce that the series for `q.comp p` indeed converges to `g ∘ f` when `q` is a power series for
`g` and `p` is a power series for `f`.
This proof is a big reindexing argument of a sum. Since it is a bit involved, we define first
the source of the change of variables (`compPartialSumSource`), its target
(`compPartialSumTarget`) and the change of variables itself (`compChangeOfVariables`) before
giving the main statement in `comp_partialSum`. -/
/-- Source set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series.
See also `comp_partialSum`. -/
def compPartialSumSource (m M N : ℕ) : Finset (Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) :=
Finset.sigma (Finset.Ico m M) (fun n : ℕ => Fintype.piFinset fun _i : Fin n => Finset.Ico 1 N :)
@[simp]
theorem mem_compPartialSumSource_iff (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) :
i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N ↔
(m ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < M) ∧ ∀ a : Fin i.1, 1 ≤ i.2 a ∧ i.2 a < N := by
simp only [compPartialSumSource, Finset.mem_Ico, Fintype.mem_piFinset, Finset.mem_sigma]
/-- Change of variables appearing to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series -/
def compChangeOfVariables (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) (hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) :
Σ n, Composition n := by
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩
rw [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff] at hi
refine ⟨∑ j, f j, ofFn fun a => f a, fun {i} hi' => ?_, by simp [sum_ofFn]⟩
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ : ∃ j : Fin n, f j = i := by rwa [mem_ofFn', Set.mem_range] at hi'
exact (hi.2 j).1
@[simp]
theorem compChangeOfVariables_length (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ}
(hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) :
Composition.length (compChangeOfVariables m M N i hi).2 = i.1 := by
rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩
dsimp [compChangeOfVariables]
simp only [Composition.length, map_ofFn, length_ofFn]
theorem compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ}
(hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) (j : Fin i.1) :
(compChangeOfVariables m M N i hi).2.blocksFun
⟨j, (compChangeOfVariables_length m M N hi).symm ▸ j.2⟩ =
i.2 j := by
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩
dsimp [Composition.blocksFun, Composition.blocks, compChangeOfVariables]
simp only [map_ofFn, List.getElem_ofFn, Function.comp_apply]
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a set. -/
def compPartialSumTargetSet (m M N : ℕ) : Set (Σ n, Composition n) :=
{i | m ≤ i.2.length ∧ i.2.length < M ∧ ∀ j : Fin i.2.length, i.2.blocksFun j < N}
theorem compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource (m M N : ℕ)
(i : Σ n, Composition n) (hi : i ∈ compPartialSumTargetSet m M N) :
∃ (j : _) (hj : j ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N), compChangeOfVariables m M N j hj = i := by
rcases i with ⟨n, c⟩
refine ⟨⟨c.length, c.blocksFun⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [compPartialSumTargetSet, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hi
simp only [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff, hi.left, hi.right, true_and, and_true]
exact fun a => c.one_le_blocks' _
· dsimp [compChangeOfVariables]
rw [Composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq]
simp only [Composition.blocksFun, Composition.blocks, Subtype.coe_eta]
conv_rhs => rw [← List.ofFn_get c.blocks]
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a finset.
See also `comp_partialSum`. -/
def compPartialSumTarget (m M N : ℕ) : Finset (Σ n, Composition n) :=
Set.Finite.toFinset <|
((Finset.finite_toSet _).dependent_image _).subset <|
compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource m M N
@[simp]
theorem mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff {m M N : ℕ} {a : Σ n, Composition n} :
a ∈ compPartialSumTarget m M N ↔
m ≤ a.2.length ∧ a.2.length < M ∧ ∀ j : Fin a.2.length, a.2.blocksFun j < N := by
simp [compPartialSumTarget, compPartialSumTargetSet]
/-- `compChangeOfVariables m M N` is a bijection between `compPartialSumSource m M N`
and `compPartialSumTarget m M N`, yielding equal sums for functions that correspond to each
other under the bijection. As `compChangeOfVariables m M N` is a dependent function, stating
that it is a bijection is not directly possible, but the consequence on sums can be stated
more easily. -/
theorem compChangeOfVariables_sum {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] (m M N : ℕ)
(f : (Σ n : ℕ, Fin n → ℕ) → α) (g : (Σ n, Composition n) → α)
(h : ∀ (e) (he : e ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N), f e = g (compChangeOfVariables m M N e he)) :
∑ e ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N, f e = ∑ e ∈ compPartialSumTarget m M N, g e := by
apply Finset.sum_bij (compChangeOfVariables m M N)
-- We should show that the correspondence we have set up is indeed a bijection
-- between the index sets of the two sums.
-- 1 - show that the image belongs to `compPartialSumTarget m N N`
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
rw [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff] at H
simp only [mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff, Composition.length, Composition.blocks, H.left,
map_ofFn, length_ofFn, true_and, compChangeOfVariables]
intro j
simp only [Composition.blocksFun, (H.right _).right, List.get_ofFn]
-- 2 - show that the map is injective
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H ⟨k', blocks_fun'⟩ H' heq
obtain rfl : k = k' := by
have := (compChangeOfVariables_length m M N H).symm
rwa [heq, compChangeOfVariables_length] at this
congr
funext i
calc
blocks_fun i = (compChangeOfVariables m M N _ H).2.blocksFun _ :=
(compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun m M N H i).symm
_ = (compChangeOfVariables m M N _ H').2.blocksFun _ := by
apply Composition.blocksFun_congr <;>
first | rw [heq] | rfl
_ = blocks_fun' i := compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun m M N H' i
-- 3 - show that the map is surjective
· intro i hi
apply compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource m M N i
simpa [compPartialSumTarget] using hi
-- 4 - show that the composition gives the `compAlongComposition` application
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
rw [h]
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
theorem compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_prod_atTop :
Tendsto (fun (p : ℕ × ℕ) => compPartialSumTarget 0 p.1 p.2) atTop atTop := by
apply Monotone.tendsto_atTop_finset
· intro m n hmn a ha
have : ∀ i, i < m.1 → i < n.1 := fun i hi => lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn.1
have : ∀ i, i < m.2 → i < n.2 := fun i hi => lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn.2
aesop
· rintro ⟨n, c⟩
simp only [mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff]
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : BddAbove ((Finset.univ.image fun i : Fin c.length => c.blocksFun i) : Set ℕ) :=
Finset.bddAbove _
refine
⟨max n c.length + 1, bot_le, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right n c.length) (lt_add_one _), fun j =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans ?_ (le_max_left _ _)) (lt_add_one _)⟩
apply hn
simp only [Finset.mem_image_of_mem, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_univ]
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
theorem compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_atTop :
Tendsto (fun N => compPartialSumTarget 0 N N) atTop atTop := by
apply Tendsto.comp compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_prod_atTop tendsto_atTop_diagonal
/-- Composing the partial sums of two multilinear series coincides with the sum over all
compositions in `compPartialSumTarget 0 N N`. This is precisely the motivation for the
definition of `compPartialSumTarget`. -/
theorem comp_partialSum (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(M N : ℕ) (z : E) :
q.partialSum M (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 N, p i fun _j => z) =
∑ i ∈ compPartialSumTarget 0 M N, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => z := by
-- we expand the composition, using the multilinearity of `q` to expand along each coordinate.
suffices H :
(∑ n ∈ Finset.range M,
∑ r ∈ Fintype.piFinset fun i : Fin n => Finset.Ico 1 N,
q n fun i : Fin n => p (r i) fun _j => z) =
∑ i ∈ compPartialSumTarget 0 M N, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => z by
simpa only [FormalMultilinearSeries.partialSum, ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_sum_finset] using H
-- rewrite the first sum as a big sum over a sigma type, in the finset
-- `compPartialSumTarget 0 N N`
rw [Finset.range_eq_Ico, Finset.sum_sigma']
-- use `compChangeOfVariables_sum`, saying that this change of variables respects sums
apply compChangeOfVariables_sum 0 M N
rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
apply congr _ (compChangeOfVariables_length 0 M N H).symm
intros
rw [← compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun 0 M N H, applyComposition, Function.comp_def]
end FormalMultilinearSeries
open FormalMultilinearSeries
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`, within
two sets `s` and `t` such that `f` maps `s` to `t`, then `g ∘ f` admits the power
series `q.comp p` at `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G}
{p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {t : Set F} {s : Set E}
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt g q t (f x)) (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x)
(hs : Set.MapsTo f s t) : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) s x := by
/- Consider `rf` and `rg` such that `f` and `g` have power series expansion on the disks
of radius `rf` and `rg`. -/
rcases hg with ⟨rg, Hg⟩
rcases hf with ⟨rf, Hf⟩
-- The terms defining `q.comp p` are geometrically summable in a disk of some radius `r`.
rcases q.comp_summable_nnreal p Hg.radius_pos Hf.radius_pos with ⟨r, r_pos : 0 < r, hr⟩
/- We will consider `y` which is smaller than `r` and `rf`, and also small enough that
`f (x + y)` is close enough to `f x` to be in the disk where `g` is well behaved. Let
`min (r, rf, δ)` be this new radius. -/
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ :
∃ δ : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < δ ∧ ∀ {z : E}, z ∈ insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x δ
→ f z ∈ insert (f x) t ∩ EMetric.ball (f x) rg := by
have : insert (f x) t ∩ EMetric.ball (f x) rg ∈ 𝓝[insert (f x) t] (f x) := by
apply inter_mem_nhdsWithin
exact EMetric.ball_mem_nhds _ Hg.r_pos
have := Hf.analyticWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_insert.tendsto_nhdsWithin (hs.insert x) this
rcases EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 this with ⟨δ, δpos, Hδ⟩
exact ⟨δ, δpos, fun {z} hz => Hδ (by rwa [Set.inter_comm])⟩
let rf' := min rf δ
have min_pos : 0 < min rf' r := by
simp only [rf', r_pos, Hf.r_pos, δpos, lt_min_iff, ENNReal.coe_pos, and_self_iff]
/- We will show that `g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` in the disk of
radius `min (r, rf', δ)`. -/
refine ⟨min rf' r, ?_⟩
refine
⟨le_trans (min_le_right rf' r) (FormalMultilinearSeries.le_comp_radius_of_summable q p r hr),
min_pos, fun {y} h'y hy ↦ ?_⟩
/- Let `y` satisfy `‖y‖ < min (r, rf', δ)`. We want to show that `g (f (x + y))` is the sum of
`q.comp p` applied to `y`. -/
-- First, check that `y` is small enough so that estimates for `f` and `g` apply.
have y_mem : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) rf :=
(EMetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _))) hy
have fy_mem : f (x + y) ∈ insert (f x) t ∩ EMetric.ball (f x) rg := by
apply hδ
have : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) δ :=
(EMetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _))) hy
simpa [-Set.mem_insert_iff, edist_eq_enorm_sub, h'y]
/- Now the proof starts. To show that the sum of `q.comp p` at `y` is `g (f (x + y))`,
we will write `q.comp p` applied to `y` as a big sum over all compositions.
Since the sum is summable, to get its convergence it suffices to get
the convergence along some increasing sequence of sets.
We will use the sequence of sets `compPartialSumTarget 0 n n`,
along which the sum is exactly the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p`, by design.
To show that it converges to `g (f (x + y))`, pointwise convergence would not be enough,
but we have uniform convergence to save the day. -/
-- First step: the partial sum of `p` converges to `f (x + y)`.
have A : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n, ∑ a ∈ Finset.Ico 1 n, p a fun _ ↦ y))
atTop (atTop ×ˢ 𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)) := by
apply Tendsto.prodMk tendsto_id
have L : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (∑ a ∈ Finset.range n, p a fun _b ↦ y) - f x
= ∑ a ∈ Finset.Ico 1 n, p a fun _b ↦ y := by
rw [eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
symm
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq', Finset.range_eq_Ico, ← Hf.coeff_zero fun _i => y,
Finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hn]
have :
Tendsto (fun n => (∑ a ∈ Finset.range n, p a fun _b => y) - f x) atTop
(𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)) :=
(Hf.hasSum h'y y_mem).tendsto_sum_nat.sub tendsto_const_nhds
exact Tendsto.congr' L this
-- Second step: the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` converges to `g (f (x + y))`.
have B : Tendsto (fun n => q.partialSum n (∑ a ∈ Finset.Ico 1 n, p a fun _b ↦ y)) atTop
(𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))) := by
-- we use the fact that the partial sums of `q` converge to `g (f (x + y))`, uniformly on a
-- neighborhood of `f (x + y)`.
have : Tendsto (fun (z : ℕ × F) ↦ q.partialSum z.1 z.2)
(atTop ×ˢ 𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)) (𝓝 (g (f x + (f (x + y) - f x)))) := by
apply Hg.tendsto_partialSum_prod (y := f (x + y) - f x)
· simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using fy_mem.2
· simpa using fy_mem.1
simpa using this.comp A
-- Third step: the sum over all compositions in `compPartialSumTarget 0 n n` converges to
-- `g (f (x + y))`. As this sum is exactly the composition of the partial sum, this is a direct
-- consequence of the second step
have C :
Tendsto
(fun n => ∑ i ∈ compPartialSumTarget 0 n n, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => y)
atTop (𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))) := by
simpa [comp_partialSum] using B
-- Fourth step: the sum over all compositions is `g (f (x + y))`. This follows from the
-- convergence along a subsequence proved in the third step, and the fact that the sum is Cauchy
-- thanks to the summability properties.
have D :
HasSum (fun i : Σ n, Composition n => q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => y)
(g (f (x + y))) :=
haveI cau :
CauchySeq fun s : Finset (Σ n, Composition n) =>
∑ i ∈ s, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => y := by
apply cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ (NNReal.summable_coe.2 hr) _
simp only [coe_nnnorm, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_pow]
rintro ⟨n, c⟩
calc
‖(compAlongComposition q p c) fun _j : Fin n => y‖ ≤
‖compAlongComposition q p c‖ * ∏ _j : Fin n, ‖y‖ := by
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm
_ ≤ ‖compAlongComposition q p c‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
rw [Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_fin]
gcongr
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_zero_eq_enorm] at hy
have := le_trans (le_of_lt hy) (min_le_right _ _)
rwa [enorm_le_coe, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm] at this
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq cau compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_atTop C
-- Fifth step: the sum over `n` of `q.comp p n` can be expressed as a particular resummation of
-- the sum over all compositions, by grouping together the compositions of the same
-- integer `n`. The convergence of the whole sum therefore implies the converence of the sum
-- of `q.comp p n`
have E : HasSum (fun n => (q.comp p) n fun _j => y) (g (f (x + y))) := by
apply D.sigma
intro n
simp only [compAlongComposition_apply, FormalMultilinearSeries.comp,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.sum_apply]
exact hasSum_fintype _
rw [Function.comp_apply]
exact E
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`,
then `g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` at `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G}
{p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E}
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesAt g q (f x)) (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) x := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_univ] at hf hg ⊢
apply hg.comp hf (by simp)
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, within
two sets `s` and `t` such that `f` maps `s` to `t`, then `g ∘ f` is analytic at `x` within `s`. -/
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {t : Set F} {s : Set E}
(hg : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x := by
let ⟨_q, hq⟩ := hg
let ⟨_p, hp⟩ := hf
exact (hq.comp hp h).analyticWithinAt
/-- Version of `AnalyticWithinAt.comp` where point equality is a separate hypothesis. -/
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.comp_of_eq {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} {x : E} {t : Set F} {s : Set E}
(hg : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x := by
rw [← hy] at hg
exact hg.comp hf h
lemma AnalyticOn.comp {f : F → G} {g : E → F} {s : Set F}
{t : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : AnalyticOn 𝕜 g t) (h : Set.MapsTo g t s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (f ∘ g) t :=
fun x m ↦ (hf _ (h m)).comp (hg x m) h
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` is
analytic at `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem AnalyticAt.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x := by
rw [← analyticWithinAt_univ] at hg hf ⊢
apply hg.comp hf (by simp)
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` is
analytic at `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem AnalyticAt.comp' {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun z ↦ g (f z)) x :=
hg.comp hf
/-- Version of `AnalyticAt.comp` where point equality is a separate hypothesis. -/
theorem AnalyticAt.comp_of_eq {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} {x : E} (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g y)
(hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hy : f x = y) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x := by
rw [← hy] at hg
exact hg.comp hf
/-- Version of `AnalyticAt.comp` where point equality is a separate hypothesis. -/
theorem AnalyticAt.comp_of_eq' {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} {x : E} (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g y)
(hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hy : f x = y) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun z ↦ g (f z)) x := by
apply hg.comp_of_eq hf hy
theorem AnalyticAt.comp_analyticWithinAt {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {s : Set E}
(hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x := by
rw [← analyticWithinAt_univ] at hg
exact hg.comp hf (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem AnalyticAt.comp_analyticWithinAt_of_eq {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} {s : Set E}
(hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g y) (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : f x = y) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x := by
rw [← h] at hg
exact hg.comp_analyticWithinAt hf
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively on `s.image f` and `s`, then `g ∘ f` is
analytic on `s`. -/
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.comp' {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g (s.image f))
(hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
fun z hz => (hg (f z) (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hz)).comp (hf z hz)
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g t) (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (st : Set.MapsTo f s t) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
comp' (mono hg (Set.mapsTo'.mp st)) hf
lemma AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn {f : F → G} {g : E → F} {s : Set F}
{t : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hg : AnalyticOn 𝕜 g t) (h : Set.MapsTo g t s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (f ∘ g) t :=
fun x m ↦ (hf _ (h m)).comp_analyticWithinAt (hg x m)
/-!
### Associativity of the composition of formal multilinear series
In this paragraph, we prove the associativity of the composition of formal power series.
By definition,
```
(r.comp q).comp p n v
= ∑_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} (r.comp q)ₖ (p_{i₁} (v₀, ..., v_{i₁ -1}), p_{i₂} (...), ..., p_{iₖ}(...))
= ∑_{a : Composition n} (r.comp q) a.length (applyComposition p a v)
```
decomposing `r.comp q` in the same way, we get
```
(r.comp q).comp p n v
= ∑_{a : Composition n} ∑_{b : Composition a.length}
r b.length (applyComposition q b (applyComposition p a v))
```
On the other hand,
```
r.comp (q.comp p) n v = ∑_{c : Composition n} r c.length (applyComposition (q.comp p) c v)
```
Here, `applyComposition (q.comp p) c v` is a vector of length `c.length`, whose `i`-th term is
given by `(q.comp p) (c.blocksFun i) (v_l, v_{l+1}, ..., v_{m-1})` where `{l, ..., m-1}` is the
`i`-th block in the composition `c`, of length `c.blocksFun i` by definition. To compute this term,
we expand it as `∑_{dᵢ : Composition (c.blocksFun i)} q dᵢ.length (applyComposition p dᵢ v')`,
where `v' = (v_l, v_{l+1}, ..., v_{m-1})`. Therefore, we get
```
r.comp (q.comp p) n v =
∑_{c : Composition n} ∑_{d₀ : Composition (c.blocksFun 0),
..., d_{c.length - 1} : Composition (c.blocksFun (c.length - 1))}
r c.length (fun i ↦ q dᵢ.length (applyComposition p dᵢ v'ᵢ))
```
To show that these terms coincide, we need to explain how to reindex the sums to put them in
bijection (and then the terms we are summing will correspond to each other). Suppose we have a
composition `a` of `n`, and a composition `b` of `a.length`. Then `b` indicates how to group
together some blocks of `a`, giving altogether `b.length` blocks of blocks. These blocks of blocks
can be called `d₀, ..., d_{a.length - 1}`, and one obtains a composition `c` of `n` by saying that
each `dᵢ` is one single block. Conversely, if one starts from `c` and the `dᵢ`s, one can concatenate
the `dᵢ`s to obtain a composition `a` of `n`, and register the lengths of the `dᵢ`s in a composition
`b` of `a.length`.
An example might be enlightening. Suppose `a = [2, 2, 3, 4, 2]`. It is a composition of
length 5 of 13. The content of the blocks may be represented as `0011222333344`.
Now take `b = [2, 3]` as a composition of `a.length = 5`. It says that the first 2 blocks of `a`
should be merged, and the last 3 blocks of `a` should be merged, giving a new composition of `13`
made of two blocks of length `4` and `9`, i.e., `c = [4, 9]`. But one can also remember that
the new first block was initially made of two blocks of size `2`, so `d₀ = [2, 2]`, and the new
second block was initially made of three blocks of size `3`, `4` and `2`, so `d₁ = [3, 4, 2]`.
This equivalence is called `Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi n` below.
We start with preliminary results on compositions, of a very specialized nature, then define the
equivalence `Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi n`, and we deduce finally the associativity of
composition of formal multilinear series in `FormalMultilinearSeries.comp_assoc`.
-/
namespace Composition
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- Rewriting equality in the dependent type `Σ (a : Composition n), Composition a.length)` in
non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the blocks coincide. -/
theorem sigma_composition_eq_iff (i j : Σ a : Composition n, Composition a.length) :
i = j ↔ i.1.blocks = j.1.blocks ∧ i.2.blocks = j.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨by rintro rfl; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rcases i with ⟨a, b⟩
rcases j with ⟨a', b'⟩
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
obtain rfl : a = a' := by ext1; exact h
obtain rfl : b = b' := by ext1; exact h'
rfl
/-- Rewriting equality in the dependent type
`Σ (c : Composition n), Π (i : Fin c.length), Composition (c.blocksFun i)` in
non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the lists of blocks coincide. -/
theorem sigma_pi_composition_eq_iff
(u v : Σ c : Composition n, ∀ i : Fin c.length, Composition (c.blocksFun i)) :
u = v ↔ (ofFn fun i => (u.2 i).blocks) = ofFn fun i => (v.2 i).blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases u with ⟨a, b⟩
rcases v with ⟨a', b'⟩
dsimp at H
obtain rfl : a = a' := by
ext1
have :
map List.sum (ofFn fun i : Fin (Composition.length a) => (b i).blocks) =
map List.sum (ofFn fun i : Fin (Composition.length a') => (b' i).blocks) := by
rw [H]
simp only [map_ofFn] at this
change
(ofFn fun i : Fin (Composition.length a) => (b i).blocks.sum) =
ofFn fun i : Fin (Composition.length a') => (b' i).blocks.sum at this
simpa [Composition.blocks_sum, Composition.ofFn_blocksFun] using this
ext1
· rfl
· simp only [heq_eq_eq, ofFn_inj] at H ⊢
ext1 i
ext1
exact congrFun H i
/-- When `a` is a composition of `n` and `b` is a composition of `a.length`, `a.gather b` is the
composition of `n` obtained by gathering all the blocks of `a` corresponding to a block of `b`.
For instance, if `a = [6, 5, 3, 5, 2]` and `b = [2, 3]`, one should gather together
the first two blocks of `a` and its last three blocks, giving `a.gather b = [11, 10]`. -/
def gather (a : Composition n) (b : Composition a.length) : Composition n where
blocks := (a.blocks.splitWrtComposition b).map sum
blocks_pos := by
rw [forall_mem_map]
intro j hj
suffices H : ∀ i ∈ j, 1 ≤ i from calc
0 < j.length := length_pos_of_mem_splitWrtComposition hj
_ ≤ j.sum := length_le_sum_of_one_le _ H
intro i hi
apply a.one_le_blocks
rw [← a.blocks.flatten_splitWrtComposition b]
exact mem_flatten_of_mem hj hi
blocks_sum := by rw [← sum_flatten, flatten_splitWrtComposition, a.blocks_sum]
theorem length_gather (a : Composition n) (b : Composition a.length) :
length (a.gather b) = b.length :=
| show (map List.sum (a.blocks.splitWrtComposition b)).length = b.blocks.length by
rw [length_map, length_splitWrtComposition]
/-- An auxiliary function used in the definition of `sigmaEquivSigmaPi` below, associating to
two compositions `a` of `n` and `b` of `a.length`, and an index `i` bounded by the length of
`a.gather b`, the subcomposition of `a` made of those blocks belonging to the `i`-th block of
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Composition.lean | 1,019 | 1,024 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Infinite sum and product over a topological monoid
This file defines unconditionally convergent sums over a commutative topological additive monoid.
For Euclidean spaces (finite dimensional Banach spaces) this is equivalent to absolute
convergence.
We also define unconditionally convergent products over a commutative topological multiplicative
monoid.
Note: There are summable sequences which are not unconditionally convergent! The other way holds
generally, see `HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat`.
## Implementation notes
We say that a function `f : β → α` has an unconditional product of `a` if the function
`fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b` converges to `a` on the `atTop` filter on `Finset β`. In other
words, for every neighborhood `U` of `a`, there exists a finite set `s : Finset β` of indices such
that `∏ b ∈ s', f b ∈ U` for any finite set `s'` which is a superset of `s`.
This may yield some unexpected results. For example, according to this definition, the product
`∏' n : ℕ, (1 : ℝ) / 2` unconditionally exists and is equal to `0`. More strikingly,
the product `∏' n : ℕ, (n : ℝ)` unconditionally exists and is equal to `0`, because one
of its terms is `0` (even though the product of the remaining terms diverges). Users who would
prefer that these products be considered not to exist can carry them out in the unit group `ℝˣ`
rather than in `ℝ`.
## References
* Bourbaki: General Topology (1995), Chapter 3 §5 (Infinite sums in commutative groups)
-/
/- **NOTE**. This file is intended to be kept short, just enough to state the basic definitions and
six key lemmas relating them together, namely `Summable.hasSum`, `Multipliable.hasProd`,
`HasSum.tsum_eq`, `HasProd.tprod_eq`, `Summable.hasSum_iff`, and `Multipliable.hasProd_iff`.
Do not add further lemmas here -- add them to `InfiniteSum.Basic` or (preferably) another, more
specific file. -/
noncomputable section
open Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- `HasProd f a` means that the (potentially infinite) product of the `f b` for `b : β` converges
to `a`.
The `atTop` filter on `Finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we take
the product over bigger and bigger sets. This product operation is invariant under reordering.
For the definition and many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant.
These are defined in an identical way to infinite sums (`HasSum`). For example, we say that
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `1 / 2` has a product of `0`, rather than saying that it does
not converge as some authors would. -/
@[to_additive "`HasSum f a` means that the (potentially infinite) sum of the `f b` for `b : β`
converges to `a`.
The `atTop` filter on `Finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we sum
up bigger and bigger sets. This sum operation is invariant under reordering. In particular,
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `(-1)^n / (n+1)` does not have a
sum for this definition, but a series which is absolutely convergent will have the correct sum.
This is based on Mario Carneiro's
[infinite sum `df-tsms` in Metamath](http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-tsms.html).
For the definition and many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant."]
def HasProd (f : β → α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Tendsto (fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) atTop (𝓝 a)
/-- `Multipliable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) product. Use `tprod` to get the value. -/
@[to_additive "`Summable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) sum. Use `tsum` to get the value."]
def Multipliable (f : β → α) : Prop :=
∃ a, HasProd f a
open scoped Classical in
/-- `∏' i, f i` is the product of `f` if it exists and is unconditionally convergent,
or 1 otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`∑' i, f i` is the sum of `f` if it exists and is unconditionally convergent,
or 0 otherwise."]
noncomputable irreducible_def tprod {β} (f : β → α) :=
if h : Multipliable f then
/- Note that the product might not be uniquely defined if the topology is not separated.
When the multiplicative support of `f` is finite, we make the most reasonable choice to use the
product over the multiplicative support. Otherwise, we choose arbitrarily an `a` satisfying
`HasProd f a`. -/
if (mulSupport f).Finite then finprod f
else h.choose
else 1
-- see Note [operator precedence of big operators]
@[inherit_doc tprod]
notation3 "∏' "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => tprod f) => r
@[inherit_doc tsum]
notation3 "∑' "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => tsum f) => r
variable {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Finset β}
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.multipliable (h : HasProd f a) : Multipliable f :=
⟨a, h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable (h : ¬Multipliable f) : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
simp [tprod_def, h]
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x, x ∉ Set.range g → f x = 1) : HasProd (f ∘ g) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp only [HasProd, Tendsto, comp_apply, hg.map_atTop_finset_prod_eq hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset {s : Set β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
Subtype.coe_injective.hasProd_iff <| by simpa using mulSupport_subset_iff'.1 hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (∏ b, f b) :=
OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) (∏ b ∈ s, f b) := by
rw [← prod_attach]
exact hasProd_fintype _
| /-- If a function `f` is `1` outside of a finite set `s`, then it `HasProd` `∏ b ∈ s, f b`. -/
@[to_additive "If a function `f` vanishes outside of a finite set `s`, then it `HasSum`
`∑ b ∈ s, f b`."]
theorem hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Defs.lean | 146 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
|
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 913 | 917 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
|
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 85 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
| simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 327 | 330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a ⊤ = Ici a := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a ⊤ = Ioi a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioi a = Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ici a = Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iio a = Iio (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iic a = Iic (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iic, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top a)]
theorem image_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Icc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ico a b = Ico (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ico, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ico_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioc a b = Ioc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioo, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
| end WithTop
/-! ### `WithBot` -/
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 107 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finsets in product types
This file defines finset constructions on the product type `α × β`. Beware not to confuse with the
`Finset.prod` operation which computes the multiplicative product.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.product`: Turns `s : Finset α`, `t : Finset β` into their product in `Finset (α × β)`.
* `Finset.diag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.diag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, a)` with
`a ∈ s`.
* `Finset.offDiag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.offDiag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, b)` with
`a, b ∈ s` and `a ≠ b`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Multiset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### prod -/
section Prod
variable {s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.product t.nodup⟩
instance instSProd : SProd (Finset α) (Finset β) (Finset (α × β)) where
sprod := Finset.product
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_sprod : Finset.product s t = s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_val : (s ×ˢ t).1 = s.1 ×ˢ t.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s ×ˢ t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Multiset.mem_product
theorem mk_mem_product (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s ×ˢ t :=
mem_product.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(↑(s ×ˢ t) : Set (α × β)) = (s : Set α) ×ˢ t :=
Set.ext fun _ => Finset.mem_product
theorem subset_product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst ⊆ s := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem subset_product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd ⊆ t := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst = s := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] (ht : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd = t := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem subset_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ s.image Prod.fst ×ˢ s.image Prod.snd := fun _ hp =>
mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ h =>
mem_product.2 ⟨hs (mem_product.1 h).1, ht (mem_product.1 h).2⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_left (hs : s ⊆ s') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t :=
product_subset_product hs (Subset.refl _)
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_right (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s ×ˢ t' :=
product_subset_product (Subset.refl _) ht
theorem prodMap_image_product {δ : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [DecidableEq δ]
(f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (Prod.map f g) = s.image f ×ˢ t.image g :=
mod_cast Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem prodMap_map_product {δ : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) (g : γ ↪ δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).map (f.prodMap g) = s.map f ×ˢ t.map g := by
simpa [← coe_inj] using Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem map_swap_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).map ⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap_injective⟩ = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_product [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).image Prod.swap = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
theorem product_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = s.biUnion fun a => t.image fun b => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
theorem product_eq_biUnion_right [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
/-- See also `Finset.sup_product_left`. -/
@[simp]
theorem product_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α × β → Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion f = s.biUnion fun a => t.biUnion fun b => f (a, b) := by
classical simp_rw [product_eq_biUnion, biUnion_biUnion, image_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem card_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : card (s ×ˢ t) = card s * card t :=
Multiset.card_product _ _
/-- The product of two Finsets is nontrivial iff both are nonempty
at least one of them is nontrivial. -/
lemma nontrivial_prod_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nontrivial ↔
s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ (s.Nontrivial ∨ t.Nontrivial) := by
simp_rw [← card_pos, ← one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial, card_product]; apply Nat.one_lt_mul_iff
theorem filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = s.filter p ×ˢ t.filter q := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [mem_filter, mem_product, decide_eq_true_eq, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
theorem filter_product_left (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1) = s.filter p ×ˢ t := by
simpa using filter_product p fun _ => true
theorem filter_product_right (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => q x.2) = s ×ˢ t.filter q := by
simpa using filter_product (fun _ : α => true) q
theorem filter_product_card (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => (p x.1) = (q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card +
(s.filter (¬ p ·)).card * (t.filter (¬ q ·)).card := by
classical
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_of_disjoint]
· apply congr_arg
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product]
constructor <;> intro h <;> use h.1
· simp only [h.2, Function.comp_apply, Decidable.em, and_self]
· revert h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, and_imp]
rintro _ _ (_|_) <;> simp [*]
· apply Finset.disjoint_filter_filter'
exact (disjoint_compl_right.inf_left _).inf_right _
@[simp]
theorem empty_product (t : Finset β) : (∅ : Finset α) ×ˢ t = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_empty (s : Finset α) : s ×ˢ (∅ : Finset β) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ h => not_mem_empty _ (Finset.mem_product.1 h).2
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.product (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht
⟨(x, y), mem_product.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.1, (mem_product.1 hxy).1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.2, (mem_product.1 hxy).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_product : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.product h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_empty {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_product, not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty,
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_product {a : α} :
({a} : Finset α) ×ˢ t = t.map ⟨Prod.mk a, Prod.mk_right_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
lemma product_singleton : s ×ˢ {b} = s.map ⟨fun i => (i, b), Prod.mk_left_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem singleton_product_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
({a} ×ˢ {b} : Finset _) = {(a, b)} := by
simp only [product_singleton, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem union_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∪ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∪ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [or_and_right, mem_union, mem_product]
@[simp]
theorem product_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∪ t') = s ×ˢ t ∪ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_or_left, mem_union, mem_product]
theorem inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∩ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∩ t') = s ×ˢ t ∩ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] :
s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t' = (s ∩ s') ×ˢ (t ∩ t') := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_assoc, and_left_comm, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem disjoint_product : Disjoint (s ×ˢ t) (s' ×ˢ t') ↔ Disjoint s s' ∨ Disjoint t t' := by
simp_rw [← disjoint_coe, coe_product, Set.disjoint_prod]
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_product (hs : Disjoint s s') :
s.disjUnion s' hs ×ˢ t = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s' ×ˢ t) (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inl hs) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.add_product _ _ _
@[simp]
| theorem product_disjUnion (ht : Disjoint t t') :
s ×ˢ t.disjUnion t' ht = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s ×ˢ t') (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inr ht) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.product_add _ _ _
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Prod.lean | 255 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Homology
/-!
# Quasi-isomorphisms of short complexes
This file introduces the typeclass `QuasiIso φ` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
of short complexes (which have homology): the condition is that the induced
morphism `homologyMap φ` in homology is an isomorphism.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
{S₁ S₂ S₃ S₄ : ShortComplex C}
[S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] [S₃.HasHomology] [S₄.HasHomology]
/-- A morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes that have homology is a quasi-isomorphism if
the induced map `homologyMap φ : S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology` is an isomorphism. -/
class QuasiIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : Prop where
/-- the homology map is an isomorphism -/
isIso' : IsIso (homologyMap φ)
instance QuasiIso.isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [QuasiIso φ] : IsIso (homologyMap φ) := QuasiIso.isIso'
lemma quasiIso_iff (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) :
QuasiIso φ ↔ IsIso (homologyMap φ) := by
constructor
· intro h
infer_instance
· intro h
exact ⟨h⟩
instance quasiIso_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] : QuasiIso φ :=
⟨(homologyMapIso (asIso φ)).isIso_hom⟩
instance quasiIso_comp (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃) [hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') := by
rw [quasiIso_iff] at hφ hφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp]
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_left (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ' := by
rw [quasiIso_iff] at hφ hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left (homologyMap φ) (homologyMap φ')
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_left (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃) [hφ : QuasiIso φ] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ' := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIso_of_comp_left φ φ'
· intro
exact quasiIso_comp φ φ'
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_right (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
[hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ := by
rw [quasiIso_iff] at hφ' hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right (homologyMap φ) (homologyMap φ')
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_right (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃) [hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIso_of_comp_right φ φ'
· intro
exact quasiIso_comp φ φ'
lemma quasiIso_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₃ ⟶ S₄) (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ')
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] : QuasiIso φ' := by
let α : S₃ ⟶ S₁ := e.inv.left
let β : S₂ ⟶ S₄ := e.hom.right
suffices φ' = α ≫ φ ≫ β by
rw [this]
infer_instance
simp only [α, β, Arrow.w_mk_right_assoc, Arrow.mk_left, Arrow.mk_right, Arrow.mk_hom,
← Arrow.comp_right, e.inv_hom_id, Arrow.id_right, comp_id]
lemma quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ' : S₃ ⟶ S₄) (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ') :
QuasiIso φ ↔ QuasiIso φ' :=
⟨fun _ => quasiIso_of_arrow_mk_iso φ φ' e, fun _ => quasiIso_of_arrow_mk_iso φ' φ e.symm⟩
lemma LeftHomologyMapData.quasiIso_iff {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} (γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
QuasiIso φ ↔ IsIso γ.φH := by
rw [ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, γ.homologyMap_eq]
constructor
· intro h
haveI : IsIso (γ.φH ≫ (LeftHomologyData.homologyIso h₂).inv) :=
IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left (LeftHomologyData.homologyIso h₁).hom _
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right _ (LeftHomologyData.homologyIso h₂).inv
· intro h
infer_instance
lemma RightHomologyMapData.quasiIso_iff {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} (γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
QuasiIso φ ↔ IsIso γ.φH := by
rw [ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, γ.homologyMap_eq]
constructor
· intro h
haveI : IsIso (γ.φH ≫ (RightHomologyData.homologyIso h₂).inv) :=
IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left (RightHomologyData.homologyIso h₁).hom _
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right _ (RightHomologyData.homologyIso h₂).inv
· intro h
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_isIso_leftHomologyMap' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
QuasiIso φ ↔ IsIso (leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
rw [γ.quasiIso_iff, γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq]
| lemma quasiIso_iff_isIso_rightHomologyMap' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
QuasiIso φ ↔ IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
rw [γ.quasiIso_iff, γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/QuasiIso.lean | 127 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, we then define `NormedLatticeAddCommGroup` as a
lattice with a covariant normed group addition satisfying the solid axiom.
## Main statements
We show that a normed lattice ordered group is a topological lattice with respect to the norm
topology.
## References
* [Meyer-Nieberg, Banach lattices][MeyerNieberg1991]
## Tags
normed, lattice, ordered, group
-/
/-!
### Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, this section introduces normed lattice ordered groups.
-/
section SolidNorm
/-- Let `α` be an `AddCommGroup` with a `Lattice` structure. A norm on `α` is *solid* if, for `a`
and `b` in `α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`.
-/
class HasSolidNorm (α : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] : Prop where
solid : ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, |x| ≤ |y| → ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α]
theorem norm_le_norm_of_abs_le_abs {a b : α} (h : |a| ≤ |b|) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ :=
HasSolidNorm.solid h
/-- If `α` has a solid norm, then the balls centered at the origin of `α` are solid sets. -/
theorem LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.isSolid_ball (r : ℝ) :
LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.IsSolid (Metric.ball (0 : α) r) := fun _ hx _ hxy =>
mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr ((HasSolidNorm.solid hxy).trans_lt (mem_ball_zero_iff.mp hx))
instance : HasSolidNorm ℝ := ⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : HasSolidNorm ℚ := ⟨fun _ _ _ => by simpa only [norm, ← Rat.cast_abs, Rat.cast_le]⟩
end SolidNorm
/--
Let `α` be a normed commutative group equipped with a partial order covariant with addition, with
respect which `α` forms a lattice. Suppose that `α` is *solid*, that is to say, for `a` and `b` in
`α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`. Then `α` is
said to be a normed lattice ordered group.
-/
@[deprecated
"Use `[NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure NormedLatticeAddCommGroup (α : Type*) extends
NormedAddCommGroup α, Lattice α, HasSolidNorm α where
add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
instance Int.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℤ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Int.norm_cast_real, ← Int.cast_abs] using h
instance Rat.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℚ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Rat.norm_cast_real, ← Rat.cast_abs] using h
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
open HasSolidNorm
theorem dual_solid (a b : α) (h : b ⊓ -b ≤ a ⊓ -a) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ := by
apply solid
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg a]
rw [← neg_inf]
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg b]
rwa [← neg_inf, neg_le_neg_iff, inf_comm _ b, inf_comm _ a]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group, then the order dual is also a
normed lattice ordered group.
-/
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.instHasSolidNorm :
HasSolidNorm αᵒᵈ :=
{ solid := dual_solid (α := α) }
theorem norm_abs_eq_norm (a : α) : ‖|a|‖ = ‖a‖ :=
(solid (abs_abs a).le).antisymm (solid (abs_abs a).symm.le)
theorem norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| = |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b + (c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b| + |c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [inf_comm c, inf_comm c]
exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_sup_sub_sup_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
| refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| = |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b + (c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b| + |c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [sup_comm c, sup_comm c]
exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_inf_le_add (x y : α) : ‖x ⊓ y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/Lattice.lean | 120 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
/-!
# Normed spaces over R or C
This file is about results on normed spaces over the fields `ℝ` and `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
None.
## Main theorems
* `ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_bound_of_ball_bound`: A bound on the norms of values of a linear
map in a ball yields a bound on the operator norm.
## Notes
This file exists mainly to avoid importing `RCLike` in the main normed space theory files.
-/
open Metric
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem RCLike.norm_coe_norm {z : E} : ‖(‖z‖ : 𝕜)‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- Lemma to normalize a vector in a normed space `E` over either `ℂ` or `ℝ` to unit length. -/
@[simp]
theorem norm_smul_inv_norm {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖(‖x‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • x‖ = 1 := by
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul]
/-- Lemma to normalize a vector in a normed space `E` over either `ℂ` or `ℝ` to length `r`. -/
theorem norm_smul_inv_norm' {r : ℝ} (r_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
‖((r : 𝕜) * (‖x‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹) • x‖ = r := by
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul, r_nonneg, rclike_simps]
theorem LinearMap.bound_of_sphere_bound {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
(h : ∀ z ∈ sphere (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) (z : E) : ‖f z‖ ≤ c / r * ‖z‖ := by
by_cases z_zero : z = 0
· rw [z_zero]
simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact le_rfl
set z₁ := ((r : 𝕜) * (‖z‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹) • z with hz₁
have norm_f_z₁ : ‖f z₁‖ ≤ c := by
apply h
rw [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm]
exact norm_smul_inv_norm' r_pos.le z_zero
have r_ne_zero : (r : 𝕜) ≠ 0 := RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr r_pos.ne'
have eq : f z = ‖z‖ / r * f z₁ := by
rw [hz₁, LinearMap.map_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel₀ _ r_ne_zero, mul_inv_cancel₀, one_mul]
simp only [z_zero, RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
rw [eq, norm_mul, norm_div, RCLike.norm_coe_norm, RCLike.norm_of_nonneg r_pos.le,
div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
apply div_le_div₀ _ _ r_pos rfl.ge
· exact mul_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans norm_f_z₁) (norm_nonneg z)
apply mul_le_mul norm_f_z₁ rfl.le (norm_nonneg z) ((norm_nonneg _).trans norm_f_z₁)
/-- `LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound` is a version of this over arbitrary nontrivially normed fields.
It produces a less precise bound so we keep both versions. -/
theorem LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound' {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
(h : ∀ z ∈ closedBall (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) (z : E) : ‖f z‖ ≤ c / r * ‖z‖ :=
f.bound_of_sphere_bound r_pos c (fun z hz => h z hz.le) z
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_bound_of_ball_bound {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ)
(f : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (h : ∀ z ∈ closedBall (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) : ‖f‖ ≤ c / r := by
apply ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound
· apply div_nonneg _ r_pos.le
exact
(norm_nonneg _).trans
(h 0 (by simp only [norm_zero, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_left, r_pos.le]))
| apply LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound' r_pos
exact fun z hz => h z hz
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem NormedSpace.sphere_nonempty_rclike [Nontrivial E] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Nonempty (sphere (0 : E) r) :=
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 E
(NormedSpace.sphere_nonempty.mpr hr).coe_sort
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/RCLike.lean | 85 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 171 | 178 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
(hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α]
(hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
theorem cycleOf_one [DecidableRel (1 : Perm α).SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf 1 x = 1 := (cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (hx : f x ≠ x) :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
theorem pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % orderOf (cycleOf f x))) x = (f ^ n) x := by
rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, pow_mod_orderOf]
theorem cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
[DecidableRel (f * g).SameCycle]
(h : Commute f g) (x : α) (hx : g x = x) : (f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x := by
ext y
| by_cases hxy : (f * g).SameCycle x y
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self]
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy, cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle]
contrapose! hxy
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
refine ⟨z, ?_⟩
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
theorem Disjoint.cycleOf_mul_distrib [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableRel g.SameCycle]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 171 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Thickenings in pseudo-metric spaces
## Main definitions
* `Metric.thickening δ s`, the open thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space.
* `Metric.cthickening δ s`, the closed thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric
space.
## Main results
* `Disjoint.exists_thickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint thickenings
* `Disjoint.exists_cthickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint closed thickenings
* `IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open`: if `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`,
some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`.
* `Metric.hasBasis_nhdsSet_cthickening`: the `cthickening`s of a compact set `K` form a basis
of the neighbourhoods of `K`
* `Metric.closure_eq_iInter_cthickening'`: the closure of a set equals the intersection
of its closed thickenings of positive radii accumulating at zero.
The same holds for open thickenings.
* `IsCompact.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall`: if `s` is compact, `cthickening δ s` is the union
of `closedBall`s of radius `δ` around `x : E`.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u}
namespace Metric
section Thickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
def thickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E < ENNReal.ofReal δ }
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt : x ∈ thickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
(open) `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_thickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.thickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hδ.le).trans ε_lt.le
/-- The (open) thickening equals the preimage of an open interval under `EMetric.infEdist`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E = (infEdist · E) ⁻¹' Iio (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The (open) thickening is an open set. -/
theorem isOpen_thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsOpen (thickening δ E) :=
Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_infEdist _ isOpen_Iio
/-- The (open) thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem thickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : thickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [thickening, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, not_top_lt]
theorem thickening_of_nonpos (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (s : Set α) : thickening δ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ => ((ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hδ).trans_le bot_le).not_lt
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function of
the thickening radius `δ`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem thickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iio_subset_Iio (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem thickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickening δ E₁ ⊆ thickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (infEdist_anti h) hx
theorem mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The frontier of the (open) thickening of a set is contained in an `EMetric.infEdist` level
set. -/
theorem frontier_thickening_subset (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} :
frontier (thickening δ E) ⊆ { x : α | infEdist x E = ENNReal.ofReal δ } :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq continuous_infEdist continuous_const
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem frontier_thickening_disjoint (A : Set α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun r : ℝ => frontier (thickening r A)) := by
refine (pairwise_disjoint_on _).2 fun r₁ r₂ hr => ?_
rcases le_total r₁ 0 with h₁ | h₁
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos h₁]
refine ((disjoint_singleton.2 fun h => hr.ne ?_).preimage _).mono (frontier_thickening_subset _)
(frontier_thickening_subset _)
apply_fun ENNReal.toReal at h
rwa [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h₁, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (h₁.trans hr.le)] at h
/-- Any set is contained in the complement of the δ-thickening of the complement of its
δ-thickening. -/
lemma subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
E ⊆ (thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
intro x x_in_E
simp only [thickening, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
apply EMetric.le_infEdist.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at hy
simpa only [edist_comm] using le_trans hy <| EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem x_in_E
/-- The δ-thickening of the complement of the δ-thickening of a set is contained in the complement
of the set. -/
lemma thickening_compl_thickening_self_subset_compl (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ ⊆ Eᶜ := by
apply compl_subset_compl.mp
simpa only [compl_compl] using subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self δ E
variable {X : Type u} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt {E : Set X} {x : X} (h : E.Nonempty) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ infDist x E < δ :=
| lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top h)
/-- A point in a metric space belongs to the (open) `δ`-thickening of a subset `E` if and only if
it is at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
theorem mem_thickening_iff {E : Set X} {x : X} : x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, dist x z < δ := by
have key_iff : ∀ z : X, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ ↔ dist x z < δ := fun z ↦ by
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 135 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
| /-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 128 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# Affine independence
This file defines affinely independent families of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineIndependent` defines affinely independent families of points
as those where no nontrivial weighted subtraction is `0`. This is
proved equivalent to two other formulations: linear independence of
the results of subtracting a base point in the family from the other
points in the family, or any equal affine combinations having the
same weights. A bundled type `Simplex` is provided for finite
affinely independent families of points, with an abbreviation
`Triangle` for the case of three points.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An indexed family is said to be affinely independent if no
nontrivial weighted subtractions (where the sum of weights is 0) are
0. -/
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
/-- The definition of `AffineIndependent`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A family with at most one point is affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
/-- A family indexed by a `Fintype` is affinely independent if and
only if no nontrivial weighted subtractions over `Finset.univ` (where
the sum of the weights is 0) are 0. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_vadd {p : ι → P} {v : V} :
AffineIndependent k (v +ᵥ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_vadd]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_vadd, AffineIndependent.vadd⟩ := affineIndependent_vadd
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V]
[SMulCommClass G k V] {p : ι → V} {a : G} :
AffineIndependent k (a • p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_smul,
← smul_comm (α := V) a, ← smul_sum, smul_eq_zero_iff_eq]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_smul, AffineIndependent.smul⟩ := affineIndependent_smul
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if the differences
from a base point in that family are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_cancel _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
/-- A set is affinely independent if and only if the differences from
a base point in that set are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
/-- A set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent if and only if,
given a point `p₁`, the vectors added to `p₁` and `p₁` itself are
affinely independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point
have equal `Set.indicator`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s1 s2 : Finset ι) (w1 w2 : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s1, w1 i = 1 →
∑ i ∈ s2, w2 i = 1 →
s1.affineCombination k p w1 = s2.affineCombination k p w2 →
Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 = Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 := by
classical
constructor
· intro ha s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 heq
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s1 ∪ s2
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w1 (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2))] at hw1
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w2 (s1.subset_union_right)] at hw2
have hws : (∑ i ∈ s1 ∪ s2, (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) i) = 0 := by
simp [hw1, hw2]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2)),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p s1.subset_union_right,
← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, Finset.affineCombination_vsub] at heq
exact ha (s1 ∪ s2) (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) hws heq i hi
· rw [← Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_union] at hi
have h₁ : Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_left _ i ↑s1 ↑s2) hi) h
have h₂ : Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_right _ i ↑s2 ↑s1) hi) h
simp [h₁, h₂]
· intro ha s w hw hs i0 hi0
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi0]
simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, const_apply]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i0 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi0 (Function.update_self ..)
fun _ _ hne => Function.update_of_ne hne ..
let w2 := w + w1
have hw2 : ∑ i ∈ s, w2 i = 1 := by
simp_all only [w2, Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, zero_add]
have hw2s : s.affineCombination k p w2 = p i0 := by
simp_all only [w2, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, zero_vadd]
replace ha := ha s s w2 w1 hw2 hw1 (hw1s.symm ▸ hw2s)
have hws : w2 i0 - w1 i0 = 0 := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe] at hi0
rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w2, ← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w1, ha, sub_self]
simpa [w2] using hws
/-- A finite family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point are equal. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ∀ w1 w2 : ι → k, ∑ i, w1 i = 1 → ∑ i, w2 i = 1 →
Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w2 → w1 = w2 := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq]
constructor
· intro h w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
simpa only [Set.indicator_univ, Finset.coe_univ] using h _ _ w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
· intro h s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
have hw1' : (∑ i, (s1 : Set ι).indicator w1 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s1)]
have hw2' : (∑ i, (s2 : Set ι).indicator w2 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s2)]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (Finset.subset_univ s1),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p (Finset.subset_univ s2)] at hweq
exact h _ _ hw1' hw2' hweq
variable {k}
/-- If we single out one member of an affine-independent family of points and affinely transport
all others along the line joining them to this member, the resulting new family of points is affine-
independent.
This is the affine version of `LinearIndependent.units_smul`. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.units_lineMap {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) (j : ι)
(w : ι → Units k) : AffineIndependent k fun i => AffineMap.lineMap (p j) (p i) (w i : k) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k _ j] at hp ⊢
simp only [AffineMap.lineMap_vsub_left, AffineMap.coe_const, AffineMap.lineMap_same, const_apply]
exact hp.units_smul fun i => w i
theorem AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 1) (h : s₁.affineCombination k p w₁ = s₂.affineCombination k p w₂) :
Set.indicator (↑s₁) w₁ = Set.indicator (↑s₂) w₂ :=
(affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq k p).1 ha s₁ s₂ w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ h
/-- An affinely independent family is injective, if the underlying
| ring is nontrivial. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.injective [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : Function.Injective p := by
intro i j hij
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ j] at ha
by_contra hij'
refine ha.ne_zero ⟨i, hij'⟩ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.mpr ?_)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 274 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
| lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 553 | 554 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, comp_neg]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : R) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul]
@[simp]
lemma comp_units_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : Rˣ) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.comp_smul
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_id {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) :
z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G)) (add_zero n) = z₁ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_zero_cochain_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_comp (φ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), G.X p ⟶ K.X p) :
(ofHoms φ).comp (ofHoms ψ) (zero_add 0) = ofHoms (fun p => φ p ≫ ψ p) := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_comp (f : F ⟶ G) (g : G ⟶ K) :
ofHom (f ≫ g) = (ofHom f).comp (ofHom g) (zero_add 0) := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.comp_f, ofHoms_comp]
variable (K)
/-- The differential on a cochain complex, as a cochain of degree `1`. -/
def diff : Cochain K K 1 := Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => K.d p q)
@[simp]
lemma diff_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) : (diff K).v p q hpq = K.d p q := rfl
end Cochain
variable {F G}
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes. -/
def δ (z : Cochain F G n) : Cochain F G m :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z.v p (p + n) rfl ≫ G.d (p + n) q +
m.negOnePow • F.d p (p + m - n) ≫ z.v (p + m - n) q (by rw [hpq, sub_add_cancel]))
/-! Similarly as for the composition of cochains, if `z : Cochain F G n`,
we usually need to carefully select intermediate indices with
good definitional properties in order to obtain a suitable expansion of the
morphisms which constitute `δ n m z : Cochain F G m` (when `n + 1 = m`, otherwise
it shall be zero). The basic equational lemma is `δ_v` below. -/
lemma δ_v (hnm : n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + m = q) (q₁ q₂ : ℤ)
(hq₁ : q₁ = q - 1) (hq₂ : p + 1 = q₂) : (δ n m z).v p q hpq =
z.v p q₁ (by rw [hq₁, ← hpq, ← hnm, ← add_assoc, add_sub_cancel_right]) ≫ G.d q₁ q
+ m.negOnePow • F.d p q₂ ≫ z.v q₂ q
(by rw [← hq₂, add_assoc, add_comm 1, hnm, hpq]) := by
obtain rfl : q₁ = p + n := by omega
obtain rfl : q₂ = p + m - n := by omega
rfl
lemma δ_shape (hnm : ¬ n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m z = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp only [δ]
rw [Cochain.mk_v, Cochain.zero_v, F.shape, G.shape, comp_zero, zero_add, zero_comp, smul_zero]
all_goals
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel]
exact fun _ => hnm (by omega)
variable (F G) (R)
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes, as a linear map. -/
@[simps!]
def δ_hom : Cochain F G n →ₗ[R] Cochain F G m where
toFun := δ n m
map_add' α β := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.add_v, add_comp, comp_add, smul_add]
abel
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, add_zero]
map_smul' r a := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.smul_v, Linear.comp_smul,
Linear.smul_comp, smul_add, add_right_inj, smul_comm m.negOnePow r]
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, smul_zero]
variable {F G R}
@[simp] lemma δ_add (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ + z₂) = δ n m z₁ + δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_add z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_sub (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ - z₂) = δ n m z₁ - δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_sub z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_zero : δ n m (0 : Cochain F G n) = 0 := (δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_zero
@[simp] lemma δ_neg (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (-z) = - δ n m z :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_neg z
@[simp] lemma δ_smul (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
(δ_hom R F G n m).map_smul k z
@[simp] lemma δ_units_smul (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
δ_smul ..
lemma δ_δ (n₀ n₁ n₂ : ℤ) (z : Cochain F G n₀) : δ n₁ n₂ (δ n₀ n₁ z) = 0 := by
by_cases h₁₂ : n₁ + 1 = n₂; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₁₂]
by_cases h₀₁ : n₀ + 1 = n₁; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₀₁, δ_zero]
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n₁ n₂ h₁₂ _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z p (q-1) (by omega) (q-2) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z (p+1) q (by omega) _ (p+2) rfl (by omega),
← h₁₂, Int.negOnePow_succ, add_comp, assoc,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, comp_zero, zero_add, comp_add,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero,
add_zero, add_neg_cancel, Units.neg_smul,
Linear.units_smul_comp, Linear.comp_units_smul]
lemma δ_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(m₁ m₂ m₁₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : n₁₂ + 1 = m₁₂) (h₁ : n₁ + 1 = m₁) (h₂ : n₂ + 1 = m₂) :
δ n₁₂ m₁₂ (z₁.comp z₂ h) = z₁.comp (δ n₂ m₂ z₂) (by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₂, ← h, add_assoc]) +
n₂.negOnePow • (δ n₁ m₁ z₁).comp z₂
(by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc]) := by
subst h₁₂ h₁ h₂ h
ext p q hpq
dsimp
rw [z₁.comp_v _ (add_assoc n₁ n₂ 1).symm p _ q rfl (by omega),
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show n₁ + 1 + n₂ = n₁ + n₂ + 1 by omega) p (p+n₁+1) q
(by omega) (by omega),
δ_v (n₁ + n₂) _ rfl (z₁.comp z₂ rfl) p q hpq (p + n₁ + n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl p _ _ rfl rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl (p+1) (p+n₁+1) q (by omega) (by omega),
δ_v n₂ (n₂+1) rfl z₂ (p+n₁) q (by omega) (p+n₁+n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₁ (n₁+1) rfl z₁ p (p+n₁+1) (by omega) (p+n₁) _ (by omega) rfl]
simp only [assoc, comp_add, add_comp, Int.negOnePow_succ, Int.negOnePow_add n₁ n₂,
Units.neg_smul, comp_neg, neg_comp, smul_neg, smul_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp,
mul_comm n₁.negOnePow n₂.negOnePow, Linear.comp_units_smul, smul_add]
abel
lemma δ_zero_cochain_comp {n₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(m₂ : ℤ) (h₂ : n₂ + 1 = m₂) :
δ n₂ m₂ (z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)) =
z₁.comp (δ n₂ m₂ z₂) (zero_add m₂) +
n₂.negOnePow • ((δ 0 1 z₁).comp z₂ (by rw [add_comm, h₂])) :=
δ_comp z₁ z₂ (zero_add n₂) 1 m₂ m₂ h₂ (zero_add 1) h₂
lemma δ_comp_zero_cochain {n₁ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0)
(m₁ : ℤ) (h₁ : n₁ + 1 = m₁) :
δ n₁ m₁ (z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)) =
z₁.comp (δ 0 1 z₂) h₁ + (δ n₁ m₁ z₁).comp z₂ (add_zero m₁) := by
simp only [δ_comp z₁ z₂ (add_zero n₁) m₁ 1 m₁ h₁ h₁ (zero_add 1), one_smul,
Int.negOnePow_zero]
@[simp]
lemma δ_zero_cochain_v (z : Cochain F G 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(δ 0 1 z).v p q hpq = z.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ G.d p q - F.d p q ≫ z.v q q (add_zero q) := by
simp only [δ_v 0 1 (zero_add 1) z p q hpq p q (by omega) hpq, zero_add,
Int.negOnePow_one, Units.neg_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHom {p : ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G) : δ 0 p (Cochain.ofHom φ) = 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· subst h
ext
simp
· rw [δ_shape]
omega
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) :
δ (-1) 0 (Cochain.ofHomotopy h) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by
ext p
have eq := h.comm p
rw [dNext_eq h.hom (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p+1) by simp),
prevD_eq h.hom (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p-1) p by simp)] at eq
rw [Cochain.ofHomotopy, δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) _ p p (add_zero p) (p-1) (p+1) rfl rfl]
simp only [Cochain.mk_v, neg_add_cancel, one_smul, Int.negOnePow_zero,
Cochain.sub_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, eq]
abel
lemma δ_neg_one_cochain (z : Cochain F G (-1)) :
δ (-1) 0 z = Cochain.ofHom (Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
(fun i j hij => z.v i j (by dsimp at hij; rw [← hij, add_neg_cancel_right]))) := by
ext p
rw [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) _ p p (add_zero p) (p-1) (p+1) rfl rfl]
simp only [neg_add_cancel, one_smul, Cochain.ofHom_v, Int.negOnePow_zero]
rw [Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p-1) p by simp)
(show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p+1) by simp)]
abel
end HomComplex
variable (F G)
open HomComplex
/-- The cochain complex of homomorphisms between two cochain complexes `F` and `G`.
In degree `n : ℤ`, it consists of the abelian group `HomComplex.Cochain F G n`. -/
@[simps! X d_hom_apply]
def HomComplex : CochainComplex AddCommGrp ℤ where
X i := AddCommGrp.of (Cochain F G i)
d i j := AddCommGrp.ofHom (δ_hom ℤ F G i j)
shape _ _ hij := by ext; simp [δ_shape _ _ hij]
d_comp_d' _ _ _ _ _ := by ext; simp [δ_δ]
namespace HomComplex
/-- The subgroup of cocycles in `Cochain F G n`. -/
def cocycle : AddSubgroup (Cochain F G n) :=
AddMonoidHom.ker (δ_hom ℤ F G n (n + 1)).toAddMonoidHom
/-- The type of `n`-cocycles, as a subtype of `Cochain F G n`. -/
def Cocycle : Type v := cocycle F G n
instance : AddCommGroup (Cocycle F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cocycle]
infer_instance
namespace Cocycle
variable {F G}
lemma mem_iff (hnm : n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) :
z ∈ cocycle F G n ↔ δ n m z = 0 := by subst hnm; rfl
variable {n}
instance : Coe (Cocycle F G n) (Cochain F G n) where
coe x := x.1
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) (h : (z₁ : Cochain F G n) = z₂) : z₁ = z₂ :=
Subtype.ext h
instance : SMul R (Cocycle F G n) where
smul r z := ⟨r • z.1, by
have hz := z.2
rw [mem_iff n (n + 1) rfl] at hz ⊢
simp only [δ_smul, hz, smul_zero]⟩
variable (F G n)
@[simp]
lemma coe_zero : (↑(0 : Cocycle F G n) : Cochain F G n) = 0 := by rfl
variable {F G n}
@[simp]
lemma coe_add (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(z₁ + z₂) : Cochain F G n) = (z₁ : Cochain F G n) + (z₂ : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_neg (z : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(-z) : Cochain F G n) = -(z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_smul (z : Cocycle F G n) (x : R) :
(↑(x • z) : Cochain F G n) = x • (z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_units_smul (z : Cocycle F G n) (x : Rˣ) :
(↑(x • z) : Cochain F G n) = x • (z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_sub (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(z₁ - z₂) : Cochain F G n) = (z₁ : Cochain F G n) - (z₂ : Cochain F G n) := rfl
instance : Module R (Cocycle F G n) where
one_smul _ := by aesop
mul_smul _ _ _ := by ext; dsimp; rw [smul_smul]
smul_zero _ := by aesop
smul_add _ _ _ := by aesop
add_smul _ _ _ := by ext; dsimp; rw [add_smul]
zero_smul := by aesop
/-- Constructor for `Cocycle F G n`, taking as inputs `z : Cochain F G n`, an integer
`m : ℤ` such that `n + 1 = m`, and the relation `δ n m z = 0`. -/
@[simps]
def mk (z : Cochain F G n) (m : ℤ) (hnm : n + 1 = m) (h : δ n m z = 0) : Cocycle F G n :=
⟨z, by simpa only [mem_iff n m hnm z] using h⟩
@[simp]
lemma δ_eq_zero {n : ℤ} (z : Cocycle F G n) (m : ℤ) : δ n m (z : Cochain F G n) = 0 := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· rw [← mem_iff n m h]
exact z.2
· exact δ_shape n m h _
/-- The `0`-cocycle associated to a morphism in `CochainComplex C ℤ`. -/
@[simps!]
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cocycle F G 0 := mk (Cochain.ofHom φ) 1 (zero_add 1) (by simp)
/-- The morphism in `CochainComplex C ℤ` associated to a `0`-cocycle. -/
@[simps]
def homOf (z : Cocycle F G 0) : F ⟶ G where
f i := (z : Cochain _ _ _).v i i (add_zero i)
comm' := by
rintro i j rfl
rcases z with ⟨z, hz⟩
dsimp
rw [mem_iff 0 1 (zero_add 1)] at hz
simpa only [δ_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.zero_v, sub_eq_zero]
using Cochain.congr_v hz i (i + 1) rfl
@[simp]
lemma homOf_ofHom_eq_self (φ : F ⟶ G) : homOf (ofHom φ) = φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_homOf_eq_self (z : Cocycle F G 0) : ofHom (homOf z) = z := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma cochain_ofHom_homOf_eq_coe (z : Cocycle F G 0) :
Cochain.ofHom (homOf z) = (z : Cochain F G 0) := by
simpa only [Cocycle.ext_iff] using ofHom_homOf_eq_self z
variable (F G)
/-- The additive equivalence between morphisms in `CochainComplex C ℤ` and `0`-cocycles. -/
@[simps]
def equivHom : (F ⟶ G) ≃+ Cocycle F G 0 where
toFun := ofHom
invFun := homOf
left_inv := homOf_ofHom_eq_self
right_inv := ofHom_homOf_eq_self
map_add' := by aesop_cat
variable (K)
/-- The `1`-cocycle given by the differential on a cochain complex. -/
@[simps!]
def diff : Cocycle K K 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.diff K) 2 rfl (by
ext p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.zero_v, δ_v 1 2 rfl _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.diff_v,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, smul_zero, add_zero])
end Cocycle
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma δ_comp_zero_cocycle {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cocycle G K 0) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.comp z₂.1 (add_zero n)) =
(δ n m z₁).comp z₂.1 (add_zero m) := by
by_cases hnm : n + 1 = m
· simp [δ_comp_zero_cochain _ _ _ hnm]
· simp [δ_shape _ _ hnm]
@[simp]
lemma δ_comp_ofHom {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (f : G ⟶ K) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom f) (add_zero n)) =
(δ n m z₁).comp (Cochain.ofHom f) (add_zero m) := by
rw [← Cocycle.ofHom_coe, δ_comp_zero_cocycle]
@[simp]
lemma δ_zero_cocycle_comp {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cocycle F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.1.comp z₂ (zero_add n)) =
z₁.1.comp (δ n m z₂) (zero_add m) := by
by_cases hnm : n + 1 = m
· simp [δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ hnm]
· simp [δ_shape _ _ hnm]
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHom_comp {n : ℤ} (f : F ⟶ G) (z : Cochain G K n) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m ((Cochain.ofHom f).comp z (zero_add n)) =
(Cochain.ofHom f).comp (δ n m z) (zero_add m) := by
rw [← Cocycle.ofHom_coe, δ_zero_cocycle_comp]
namespace Cochain
/-- Given two morphisms of complexes `φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G`, the datum of an homotopy between `φ₁` and
`φ₂` is equivalent to the datum of a `1`-cochain `z` such that `δ (-1) 0 z` is the difference
of the zero cochains associated to `φ₂` and `φ₁`. -/
@[simps]
def equivHomotopy (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Homotopy φ₁ φ₂ ≃
{ z : Cochain F G (-1) // Cochain.ofHom φ₁ = δ (-1) 0 z + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ } where
toFun ho := ⟨Cochain.ofHomotopy ho, by simp only [δ_ofHomotopy, sub_add_cancel]⟩
invFun z :=
{ hom := fun i j => if hij : i + (-1) = j then z.1.v i j hij else 0
zero := fun i j (hij : j + 1 ≠ i) => dif_neg (fun _ => hij (by omega))
comm := fun p => by
have eq := Cochain.congr_v z.2 p p (add_zero p)
have h₁ : (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p - 1) p := by simp
have h₂ : (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p + 1) := by simp
simp only [δ_neg_one_cochain, Cochain.ofHom_v, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Cochain.add_v,
Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f h₁ h₂] at eq
rw [dNext_eq _ h₂, prevD_eq _ h₁, eq, dif_pos, dif_pos] }
left_inv := fun ho => by
ext i j
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· rw [ho.zero i j (fun h' => h (by dsimp at h'; omega))]
right_inv := fun z => by
ext p q hpq
dsimp [Cochain.ofHomotopy]
rw [dif_pos hpq]
@[simp]
lemma equivHomotopy_apply_of_eq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
(equivHomotopy _ _ (Homotopy.ofEq h)).1 = 0 := rfl
lemma ofHom_injective {f₁ f₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : ofHom f₁ = ofHom f₂) : f₁ = f₂ :=
(Cocycle.equivHom F G).injective (by ext1; exact h)
end Cochain
section
variable {n} {D : Type*} [Category D] [Preadditive D] (z z' : Cochain K L n) (f : K ⟶ L)
(Φ : C ⥤ D) [Φ.Additive]
namespace Cochain
/-- If `Φ : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, a cochain `z : Cochain K L n` between
cochain complexes in `C` can be mapped to a cochain between the cochain complexes
in `D` obtained by applying the functor
`Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _ : CochainComplex C ℤ ⥤ CochainComplex D ℤ`. -/
def map : Cochain ((Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj K) ((Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj L) n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => Φ.map (z.v p q hpq))
@[simp]
lemma map_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) : (z.map Φ).v p q hpq = Φ.map (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
protected lemma map_add : (z + z').map Φ = z.map Φ + z'.map Φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
protected lemma map_neg : (-z).map Φ = -z.map Φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
protected lemma map_sub : (z - z').map Φ = z.map Φ - z'.map Φ := by aesop_cat
|
variable (K L n)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 802 | 803 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
/-!
# Squares and even elements
This file defines square and even elements in a monoid.
## Main declarations
* `IsSquare a` means that there is some `r` such that `a = r * r`
* `Even a` means that there is some `r` such that `a = r + r`
## Note
* Many lemmas about `Even` / `IsSquare`, including important `simp` lemmas,
are in `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity`.
## TODO
* Try to generalize `IsSquare/Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas in
`Algebra.Ring.Parity` whose `Semiring` assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary.
* The "old" definition of `Even a` asked for the existence of an element `c` such that `a = 2 * c`.
For this reason, several fixes introduce an extra `two_mul` or `← two_mul`.
It might be the case that by making a careful choice of `simp` lemma, this can be avoided.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity` for the definition of odd elements as well as facts about
`Even` / `IsSquare` in rings.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul α]
/-- An element `a` of a type `α` with multiplication satisfies `IsSquare a` if `a = r * r`,
for some root `r : α`. -/
@[to_additive "An element `a` of a type `α` with addition satisfies `Even a` if `a = r + r`,
for some `r : α`."]
def IsSquare (a : α) : Prop := ∃ r, a = r * r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma IsSquare.mul_self (r : α) : IsSquare (r * r) := ⟨r, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isSquare_op_iff {a : α} : IsSquare (op a) ↔ IsSquare a :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ ↦ ⟨unop r, congr_arg unop hr⟩, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ ↦ ⟨op r, congr_arg op hr⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isSquare_unop_iff {a : αᵐᵒᵖ} : IsSquare (unop a) ↔ IsSquare a := isSquare_op_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
instance [DecidablePred (IsSquare : α → Prop)] : DecidablePred (IsSquare : αᵐᵒᵖ → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ isSquare_unop_iff
@[simp]
lemma even_ofMul_iff {a : α} : Even (Additive.ofMul a) ↔ IsSquare a := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma isSquare_toMul_iff {a : Additive α} : IsSquare (a.toMul) ↔ Even a := Iff.rfl
instance Additive.instDecidablePredEven [DecidablePred (IsSquare : α → Prop)] :
DecidablePred (Even : Additive α → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ isSquare_toMul_iff
end Mul
section Add
variable [Add α]
@[simp] lemma isSquare_ofAdd_iff {a : α} : IsSquare (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) ↔ Even a := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma even_toAdd_iff {a : Multiplicative α} : Even a.toAdd ↔ IsSquare a := Iff.rfl
instance Multiplicative.instDecidablePredIsSquare [DecidablePred (Even : α → Prop)] :
DecidablePred (IsSquare : Multiplicative α → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ even_toAdd_iff
end Add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma IsSquare.one [MulOneClass α] : IsSquare (1 : α) := ⟨1, (mul_one _).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias isSquare_one := IsSquare.one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias even_zero := Even.zero
section MonoidHom
variable [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsSquare.map {a : α} (f : F) : IsSquare a → IsSquare (f a) :=
fun ⟨r, _⟩ => ⟨f r, by simp_all⟩
end MonoidHom
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[to_additive even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma isSquare_iff_exists_sq (a : α) : IsSquare a ↔ ∃ r, a = r ^ 2 := by simp [IsSquare, pow_two]
@[to_additive Even.exists_two_nsmul
"Alias of the forwards direction of `even_iff_exists_two_nsmul`."]
alias ⟨IsSquare.exists_sq, _⟩ := isSquare_iff_exists_sq
-- provable by simp in `Algebra.Ring.Parity`
@[to_additive Even.two_nsmul]
lemma IsSquare.sq (r : α) : IsSquare (r ^ 2) := ⟨r, pow_two _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias IsSquare_sq := IsSquare.sq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias even_two_nsmul := Even.two_nsmul
@[to_additive Even.nsmul_right] lemma IsSquare.pow (n : ℕ) : IsSquare a → IsSquare (a ^ n) := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r ^ n, (Commute.refl _).mul_pow _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-19")] alias Even.nsmul := Even.nsmul_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Even.nsmul_left]
lemma Even.isSquare_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, IsSquare (a ^ n) := by
rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩ a; exact ⟨a ^ m, pow_add _ _ _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-19")] alias Even.nsmul' := Even.nsmul_left
end Monoid
@[to_additive]
lemma IsSquare.mul [CommSemigroup α] {a b : α} : IsSquare a → IsSquare b → IsSquare (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩ ⟨s, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r * s, mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ _ _⟩
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma isSquare_inv : IsSquare a⁻¹ ↔ IsSquare a := by
constructor <;> intro h <;> simpa using (isSquare_op_iff.mpr h).map (MulEquiv.inv' α).symm
@[to_additive] alias ⟨_, IsSquare.inv⟩ := isSquare_inv
@[to_additive Even.zsmul_right] lemma IsSquare.zpow (n : ℤ) : IsSquare a → IsSquare (a ^ n) := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r ^ n, (Commute.refl _).mul_zpow _⟩
end DivisionMonoid
@[to_additive]
lemma IsSquare.div [DivisionCommMonoid α] {a b : α} (ha : IsSquare a) (hb : IsSquare b) :
IsSquare (a / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact ha.mul hb.inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Even.zsmul_left]
lemma Even.isSquare_zpow [Group α] {n : ℤ} : Even n → ∀ a : α, IsSquare (a ^ n) := by
rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩ a; exact ⟨a ^ m, zpow_add _ _ _⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Even.lean | 177 | 179 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Tangent cone
In this file, we define two predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x` and `UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s`
ensuring that, if a function has two derivatives, then they have to coincide. As a direct
definition of this fact (quantifying on all target types and all functions) would depend on
universes, we use a more intrinsic definition: if all the possible tangent directions to the set
`s` at the point `x` span a dense subset of the whole subset, it is easy to check that the
derivative has to be unique.
Therefore, we introduce the set of all tangent directions, named `tangentConeAt`,
and express `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` in terms of it.
One should however think of this definition as an implementation detail: the only reason to
introduce the predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` is to ensure the uniqueness
of the derivative. This is why their names reflect their uses, and not how they are defined.
## Implementation details
Note that this file is imported by `Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. Hence, derivatives are
not defined yet. The property of uniqueness of the derivative is therefore proved in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`, but based on the properties of the tangent cone we prove
here.
-/
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
open Filter Set Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise
section TangentCone
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- The set of all tangent directions to the set `s` at the point `x`. -/
def tangentConeAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Set E :=
{ y : E | ∃ (c : ℕ → 𝕜) (d : ℕ → E),
(∀ᶠ n in atTop, x + d n ∈ s) ∧
Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) atTop atTop ∧
Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) atTop (𝓝 y) }
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at `x` spans a dense subset of the whole space.
The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential within `s` at `x` is unique,
hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`.
To avoid pathologies in dimension 0, we also require that `x` belongs to the closure of `s` (which
is automatic when `E` is not `0`-dimensional). -/
@[mk_iff]
structure UniqueDiffWithinAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop where
dense_tangentConeAt : Dense (Submodule.span 𝕜 (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) : Set E)
mem_closure : x ∈ closure s
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentCone := UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentConeAt
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at any of its points spans a dense subset of
the whole space. The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential along `s` is
unique, hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffOn.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. -/
def UniqueDiffOn (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
end TangentCone
variable {𝕜}
variable {E F G : Type*}
section TangentCone
-- This section is devoted to the properties of the tangent cone.
open NormedField
section TVS
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
theorem mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul {r : 𝕜} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr : ‖r‖ < 1)
(hs : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + r ^ n • y ∈ s) : y ∈ tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
refine ⟨fun n ↦ (r ^ n)⁻¹, fun n ↦ r ^ n • y, hs, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [norm_inv, norm_pow, ← inv_pow]
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt <| (one_lt_inv₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hr₀)).2 hr
· simp only [inv_smul_smul₀ (pow_ne_zero _ hr₀), tendsto_const_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem tangentConeAt_univ : tangentConeAt 𝕜 univ x = univ :=
let ⟨_r, hr₀, hr⟩ := exists_norm_lt_one 𝕜
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul (norm_pos_iff.1 hr₀) hr <|
Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_univ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_univ := tangentConeAt_univ
@[gcongr]
theorem tangentConeAt_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ⊆ tangentConeAt 𝕜 t x := by
rintro y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩
| exact ⟨c, d, mem_of_superset ds fun n hn => h hn, ctop, clim⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_mono := tangentConeAt_mono
end TVS
section Normed
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
@[simp]
theorem tangentConeAt_closure : tangentConeAt 𝕜 (closure s) x = tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/TangentCone.lean | 105 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
classical
convert J.add_mem (J.mul_mem_left (update 0 i r) hxJ)
(b := update 1 i y) (le <| by apply update_self i y 1 ▸ hy)
ext j
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa [eq_comm] using eq
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I J : Ideal S) :
comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
inj' _ _ eq := SetLike.ext' (Set.preimage_injective.mpr hf <| SetLike.ext'_iff.mp eq)
map_rel_iff' := comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective _ hf ..
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {I : Ideal R}
(H : IsMaximal I) : map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top ↦ ⟨⟨ne_top, fun _J hJ ↦ comap_injective_of_surjective f hf <|
H.1.2 _ (le_comap_map.trans_lt <| (orderEmbeddingOfSurjective f hf).strictMono hJ)⟩⟩
end Surjective
section Injective
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
theorem comap_bot_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm {I : Ideal S} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv (RingEquiv.symm f)
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {y : S} :
f.symm y ∈ I ↔ y ∈ I.map f := by
rw [← comap_symm, mem_comap]
@[simp]
theorem apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {x : R} :
f x ∈ I.map f ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← comap_symm, Ideal.mem_comap, f.symm_apply_apply]
theorem mem_map_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{I : Ideal R} (y : S) : y ∈ map e I ↔ ∃ x ∈ I, e x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simp_rw [show map e I = _ from map_comap_of_equiv (e : R ≃+* S)] at h
exact ⟨(e : R ≃+* S).symm y, h, (e : R ≃+* S).apply_symm_apply y⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mem_map_of_mem e hx
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f) {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S}
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := map_comap_of_surjective _ hf.2
right_inv J :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ h ↦ have ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf.2).mp h; hf.1 eq ▸ hy)
le_comap_map
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, comap_mono⟩
have := map_mono (f := f) h
simpa only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, map_comap_of_surjective f hf.2] using this
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
lemma comap_map_of_bijective : (I.map f).comap f = I :=
le_antisymm ((comap_le_iff_le_map f hf).mpr fun _ ↦ id) le_comap_map
theorem isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (map f I) ↔ IsMaximal I := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).symm.isCoatom_iff _
theorem isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (comap f K) ↔ IsMaximal K := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).isCoatom_iff _
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.map_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.comap_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective
/-- A ring isomorphism sends a maximal ideal to a maximal ideal. -/
instance map_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (map e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.map_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
/-- The pullback of a maximal ideal under a ring isomorphism is a maximal ideal. -/
instance comap_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal S} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (comap e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.comap_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
theorem isMaximal_iff_of_bijective : (⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h ↦ map_bot (f := f) ▸ h.map_bijective f hf, fun h ↦ have e := RingEquiv.ofBijective f hf
map_bot (f := e.symm) ▸ h.map_bijective _ e.symm.bijective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias map.isMaximal := IsMaximal.map_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias comap.isMaximal := IsMaximal.comap_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff := isMaximal_iff_of_bijective
end Bijective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
-- May not hold if `R` is a semiring: consider `ℕ →+* ZMod 2`.
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] :
IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end Surjective
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable (I J : Ideal R) (K L : Ideal S)
protected theorem map_mul {R} [Semiring R] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
(f : F) (I J : Ideal R) :
map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a (semi)ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →+* Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' := Ideal.map_mul f
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_add' I J := Ideal.map_sup f I J
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(Ideal.map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
lemma disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
{p : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} [p.IsPrime] :
Disjoint (I : Set S) (p.primeCompl.map f) ↔ I.comap f ≤ p := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
simp [Set.disjoint_iff, Set.ext_iff, Ideal.primeCompl, not_imp_not, SetLike.le_def]
/-- For a prime ideal `p` of `R`, `p` extended to `S` and
restricted back to `R` is `p` if and only if `p` is the restriction of a prime in `S`. -/
lemma comap_map_eq_self_iff_of_isPrime {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S}
(p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
(p.map f).comap f = p ↔ (∃ (q : Ideal S), q.IsPrime ∧ q.comap f = p) := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂, hq₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_prime_disjoint _ _
(disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mpr hp.le)
exact ⟨q, hq₁, le_antisymm (disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mp hq₃)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hq₂)⟩
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
simp
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
instance (priority := low) : (ker f).IsTwoSided := inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsTwoSided
variable {f} in
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : (ker f).comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, Ideal.comap_comap, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel. -/
theorem not_one_mem_ker [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1 : R) ∉ ker f := by
rw [mem_ker, map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem ker_ne_top [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr <| not_one_mem_ker f
lemma _root_.Pi.ker_ringHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
(φ : ∀ i, S →+* R i) : ker (Pi.ringHom φ) = ⨅ i, ker (φ i) := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Ideal.mem_iInf, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeSRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeSRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
theorem ker_coe_toRingHom : ker (f : R →+* S) = ker f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_equiv {F' : Type*} [EquivLike F' R S] [RingEquivClass F' R S] (f : F') :
ker f = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
lemma ker_equiv_comp (f : R →+* S) (e : S ≃+* T) :
ker (e.toRingHom.comp f) = RingHom.ker f := by
rw [← RingHom.comap_ker, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.ker_coe_equiv, RingHom.ker]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Semiring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : Function.Injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, ker_eq, Set.ext_iff]
exact injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 := by
rw [← injective_iff_map_eq_zero f, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot]
lemma ker_comp_of_injective [Semiring T] (g : T →+* R) {f : R →+* S} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
ker (f.comp g) = RingHom.ker g := by
rw [← RingHom.comap_ker, (injective_iff_ker_eq_bot f).mp hf, RingHom.ker]
/-- Synonym for `RingHom.ker_coe_equiv`, but given an algebra equivalence. -/
@[simp] theorem _root_.AlgHom.ker_coe_equiv {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
RingHom.ker (e : A →+* B) = ⊥ :=
RingHom.ker_coe_equiv (e.toRingEquiv)
end Ring
section RingRing
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {x y} : x - y ∈ ker f ↔ f x = f y := by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
end RingRing
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a domain is a prime ideal. -/
theorem ker_isPrime {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [IsDomain S]
[FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) :
(ker f).IsPrime :=
have := Ideal.bot_prime (α := S)
inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsPrime
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a field is a maximal ideal. -/
theorem ker_isMaximal_of_surjective {R K F : Type*} [Ring R] [DivisionRing K]
[FunLike F R K] [RingHomClass F R K] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (ker f).IsMaximal :=
have := Ideal.bot_isMaximal (K := K)
Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective _ hf
end RingHom
section annihilator
section Semiring
variable {R M M' : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
variable (R M) in
/-- `Module.annihilator R M` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • M = 0`. -/
def Module.annihilator : Ideal R := RingHom.ker (Module.toAddMonoidEnd R M)
theorem Module.mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ Module.annihilator R M ↔ ∀ m : M, r • m = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ (congr($h ·)), (AddMonoidHom.ext ·)⟩
instance (priority := low) : (Module.annihilator R M).IsTwoSided :=
inferInstanceAs (RingHom.ker _).IsTwoSided
theorem LinearMap.annihilator_le_of_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Module.annihilator R M' ≤ Module.annihilator R M := fun x h ↦ by
rw [Module.mem_annihilator] at h ⊢; exact fun m ↦ hf (by rw [map_smul, h, f.map_zero])
theorem LinearMap.annihilator_le_of_surjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M')
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Module.annihilator R M ≤ Module.annihilator R M' := fun x h ↦ by
rw [Module.mem_annihilator] at h ⊢
intro m; obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := hf m
rw [← map_smul, h, f.map_zero]
theorem LinearEquiv.annihilator_eq (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
Module.annihilator R M = Module.annihilator R M' :=
(e.annihilator_le_of_surjective e.surjective).antisymm (e.annihilator_le_of_injective e.injective)
theorem Module.comap_annihilator {R₀} [CommSemiring R₀] [Module R₀ M]
[Algebra R₀ R] [IsScalarTower R₀ R M] :
| (Module.annihilator R M).comap (algebraMap R₀ R) = Module.annihilator R₀ M := by
ext x
simp [mem_annihilator]
lemma Module.annihilator_eq_bot {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
Module.annihilator R M = ⊥ ↔ FaithfulSMul R M := by
rw [← le_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨fun {r s} H' ↦ ?_⟩, fun ⟨H⟩ {a} ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
exact H (Module.mem_annihilator (r := r - s).mpr
(by simp only [sub_smul, H', sub_self, implies_true]))
· exact @H a 0 (by simp [Module.mem_annihilator.mp ha])
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 791 | 803 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : #σ.support < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_mul {f g : Perm α} (h : f.Disjoint g) :
(f * g).cycleType = f.cycleType + g.cycleType := by
simp only [Perm.cycleType]
rw [h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union]
simp only [Finset.union_val, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _, Multiset.map_add]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_val, Disjoint.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j))
(hs' : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j) :=
hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute)) :
(s.noncommProd k hs').cycleType = s.sum fun i ↦ (k i).cycleType := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.sum_insert hi]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rwa [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, Multiset.singleton_inj] at h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : #σ.support ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
theorem isConj_iff_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.cycleType = τ.cycleType :=
⟨fun h => by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 h
rw [cycleType_conj], isConj_of_cycleType_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_extendDomain {β : Type*} [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] {p : β → Prop}
[DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
cycleType (g.extendDomain f) = cycleType g := by
induction g using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => rw [extendDomain_one, cycleType_one, cycleType_one]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
rw [(hσ.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ.cycleType, card_support_extend_domain]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ =>
rw [hd.cycleType, ← extendDomain_mul, (hd.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ, hτ]
theorem cycleType_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {g : Perm (Subtype p)} :
cycleType (ofSubtype g) = cycleType g :=
cycleType_extendDomain (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
theorem mem_cycleType_iff {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} :
n ∈ cycleType σ ↔ ∃ c τ, σ = c * τ ∧ Disjoint c τ ∧ IsCycle c ∧ c.support.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hlc, hld⟩ := truncCycleFactors σ
rw [cycleType_eq _ rfl hlc hld, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨c, cl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [(List.perm_cons_erase cl).pairwise_iff @(Disjoint.symmetric)] at hld
refine ⟨c, (l.erase c).prod, ?_, ?_, hlc _ cl, rfl⟩
· rw [← List.prod_cons, (List.perm_cons_erase cl).symm.prod_eq' (hld.imp Disjoint.commute)]
· exact disjoint_prod_right _ fun g => List.rel_of_pairwise_cons hld
· rintro ⟨c, t, rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩
simp [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType]
theorem le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} (h : n ∈ cycleType σ) :
n ≤ #σ.support :=
(le_sum_of_mem h).trans (le_of_eq σ.sum_cycleType)
theorem cycleType_of_card_le_mem_cycleType_add_two {n : ℕ} {g : Perm α}
(hn2 : Fintype.card α < n + 2) (hng : n ∈ g.cycleType) : g.cycleType = {n} := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 hng
suffices g'1 : g' = 1 by
rw [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType, g'1, cycleType_one, add_zero]
contrapose! hn2 with g'1
apply le_trans _ (c * g').support.card_le_univ
rw [hd.card_support_mul]
exact add_le_add_left (two_le_card_support_of_ne_one g'1) _
end CycleType
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
open Function in
/-- The number of fixed points of a `p ^ n`-th root of the identity function over a finite set
and the set's cardinality have the same residue modulo `p`, where `p` is a prime. -/
theorem card_fixedPoints_modEq [DecidableEq α] {f : Function.End α} {p n : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hf : f ^ p ^ n = 1) :
Fintype.card α ≡ Fintype.card f.fixedPoints [MOD p] := by
let σ : α ≃ α := ⟨f, f ^ (p ^ n - 1),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_sub_mul_pow f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_mul_pow_sub f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf)⟩
have hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1 := by
rw [DFunLike.ext'_iff, coe_pow]
exact (hom_coe_pow (fun g : Function.End α ↦ g) rfl (fun g h ↦ rfl) f (p ^ n)).symm.trans hf
suffices Fintype.card f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ.card from
this ▸ (card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm
suffices f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ by
simp only [this]; apply Fintype.card_coe
simp [σ, Set.ext_iff, IsFixedPt]
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : ¬p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : ∃ a : α, σ a = a := by
classical
contrapose! hα
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hα
exact Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((congr_arg _ (Finset.card_eq_zero.2 (compl_eq_bot.2 hα))).mp
(card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm)
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime' {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) {a : α} (ha : σ a = a) : ∃ b : α, σ b = b ∧ b ≠ a := by
classical
have h : ∀ b : α, b ∈ σ.supportᶜ ↔ σ b = b := fun b => by
rw [Finset.mem_compl, mem_support, Classical.not_not]
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := Finset.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hp.out.one_lt.trans_le
(Nat.le_of_dvd (Finset.card_pos.mpr ⟨a, (h a).mpr ha⟩) (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp
((card_compl_support_modEq hσ).trans (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr hα))))) a
exact ⟨b, (h b).mp hb1, hb2⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : Fintype.card α < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
classical exact isCycle_of_prime_order h1 (lt_of_le_of_lt σ.support.card_le_univ h2)
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order'' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h2 : orderOf σ = Fintype.card α) : σ.IsCycle :=
isCycle_of_prime_order' ((congr_arg Nat.Prime h2).mpr h1) <| by
rw [← one_mul (Fintype.card α), ← h2, mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ)]
exact one_lt_two
section Cauchy
variable (G : Type*) [Group G] (n : ℕ)
/-- The type of vectors with terms from `G`, length `n`, and product equal to `1:G`. -/
def vectorsProdEqOne : Set (List.Vector G n) :=
{ v | v.toList.prod = 1 }
namespace VectorsProdEqOne
theorem mem_iff {n : ℕ} (v : List.Vector G n) : v ∈ vectorsProdEqOne G n ↔ v.toList.prod = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem zero_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 0 = {Vector.nil} :=
Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨Eq.refl (1 : G), fun v _ => v.eq_nil⟩
theorem one_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 1 = {Vector.nil.cons 1} := by
simp_rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_iff, List.Vector.toList_singleton,
List.prod_singleton, List.Vector.head_cons, true_and]
exact fun v hv => v.cons_head_tail.symm.trans (congr_arg₂ Vector.cons hv v.tail.eq_nil)
instance zeroUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) := by
rw [zero_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton Vector.nil
instance oneUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 1) := by
rw [one_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton (Vector.nil.cons 1)
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n`, make a vector of length `n + 1` whose product is `1`,
by appending the inverse of the product of `v`. -/
@[simps]
def vectorEquiv : List.Vector G n ≃ vectorsProdEqOne G (n + 1) where
toFun v := ⟨v.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v, by
rw [mem_iff, Vector.toList_cons, List.prod_cons, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
invFun v := v.1.tail
left_inv v := v.tail_cons v.toList.prod⁻¹
right_inv v := Subtype.ext <|
calc
v.1.tail.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v.1.tail = v.1.head ::ᵥ v.1.tail :=
congr_arg (· ::ᵥ v.1.tail) <| Eq.symm <| eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by
rw [← List.prod_cons, ← Vector.toList_cons, v.1.cons_head_tail]
exact v.2
_ = v.1 := v.1.cons_head_tail
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n` whose product is 1, make a vector of length `n - 1`,
by deleting the last entry of `v`. -/
def equivVector : ∀ n, vectorsProdEqOne G n ≃ List.Vector G (n - 1)
| 0 => (ofUnique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) (vectorsProdEqOne G 1)).trans (vectorEquiv G 0).symm
| (n + 1) => (vectorEquiv G n).symm
instance [Fintype G] : Fintype (vectorsProdEqOne G n) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (List.Vector G (n - 1)) (equivVector G n).symm
theorem card [Fintype G] : Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G n) = Fintype.card G ^ (n - 1) :=
(Fintype.card_congr (equivVector G n)).trans (card_vector (n - 1))
variable {G n} {g : G}
variable (v : vectorsProdEqOne G n) (j k : ℕ)
/-- Rotate a vector whose product is 1. -/
def rotate : vectorsProdEqOne G n :=
⟨⟨_, (v.1.1.length_rotate k).trans v.1.2⟩, List.prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one v.2 k⟩
theorem rotate_zero : rotate v 0 = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext v.1.1.rotate_zero)
theorem rotate_rotate : rotate (rotate v j) k = rotate v (j + k) :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (v.1.1.rotate_rotate j k))
theorem rotate_length : rotate v n = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext ((congr_arg _ v.1.2.symm).trans v.1.1.rotate_length))
end VectorsProdEqOne
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G` there exists an element of order
`p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem. -/
theorem _root_.exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Fintype.card G) : ∃ x : G, orderOf x = p := by
have hp' : p - 1 ≠ 0 := mt tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt hp.out.one_lt)
have Scard :=
calc
p ∣ Fintype.card G ^ (p - 1) := hdvd.trans (dvd_pow (dvd_refl _) hp')
_ = Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G p) := (VectorsProdEqOne.card G p).symm
let f : ℕ → vectorsProdEqOne G p → vectorsProdEqOne G p := fun k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate v k
have hf1 : ∀ v, f 0 v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_zero
have hf2 : ∀ j k v, f k (f j v) = f (j + k) v := fun j k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_rotate v j k
have hf3 : ∀ v, f p v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_length
let σ :=
Equiv.mk (f 1) (f (p - 1)) (fun s => by rw [hf2, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3])
fun s => by rw [hf2, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3]
have hσ : ∀ k v, (σ ^ k) v = f k v := fun k =>
Nat.rec (fun v => (hf1 v).symm) (fun k hk v => by
rw [pow_succ, Perm.mul_apply, hk (σ v), Nat.succ_eq_one_add, ← hf2 1 k]
simp only [σ, coe_fn_mk]) k
replace hσ : σ ^ p ^ 1 = 1 := Perm.ext fun v => by rw [pow_one, hσ, hf3, one_apply]
let v₀ : vectorsProdEqOne G p :=
⟨List.Vector.replicate p 1, (List.prod_replicate p 1).trans (one_pow p)⟩
have hv₀ : σ v₀ = v₀ := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (List.rotate_replicate (1 : G) p 1))
obtain ⟨v, hv1, hv2⟩ := exists_fixed_point_of_prime' Scard hσ hv₀
refine
Exists.imp (fun g hg => orderOf_eq_prime ?_ fun hg' => hv2 ?_)
(List.rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp (Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Subtype.ext_iff.mp hv1)))
· rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← v.1.2, ← hg, show v.val.val.prod = 1 from v.2]
· rw [Subtype.ext_iff_val, Subtype.ext_iff_val, hg, hg', v.1.2]
simp only [v₀, List.Vector.replicate]
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite additive group `G` there exists an element of
order `p` in `G`. This is the additive version of Cauchy's theorem. -/
theorem _root_.exists_prime_addOrderOf_dvd_card {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [Fintype G] (p : ℕ)
[Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Fintype.card G) : ∃ x : G, addOrderOf x = p :=
@exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ (by convert hdvd)
attribute [to_additive existing] exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G` there exists an element of order
`p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card' {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Nat.card G) : ∃ x : G, orderOf x = p := by
have := Fintype.ofFinite G
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at hdvd
exact exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hdvd
end Cauchy
theorem subgroup_eq_top_of_swap_mem [DecidableEq α] {H : Subgroup (Perm α)}
[d : DecidablePred (· ∈ H)] {τ : Perm α} (h0 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h1 : Fintype.card α ∣ Fintype.card H) (h2 : τ ∈ H) (h3 : IsSwap τ) : H = ⊤ := by
haveI : Fact (Fintype.card α).Prime := ⟨h0⟩
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (Fintype.card α) h1
have hσ1 : orderOf (σ : Perm α) = Fintype.card α := (Subgroup.orderOf_coe σ).trans hσ
have hσ2 : IsCycle ↑σ := isCycle_of_prime_order'' h0 hσ1
have hσ3 : (σ : Perm α).support = ⊤ :=
Finset.eq_univ_of_card (σ : Perm α).support (hσ2.orderOf.symm.trans hσ1)
have hσ4 : Subgroup.closure {↑σ, τ} = ⊤ := closure_prime_cycle_swap h0 hσ2 hσ3 h3
rw [eq_top_iff, ← hσ4, Subgroup.closure_le, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨Subtype.mem σ, h2⟩
section Partition
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The partition corresponding to a permutation -/
def partition (σ : Perm α) : (Fintype.card α).Partition where
parts := σ.cycleType + Multiset.replicate (Fintype.card α - #σ.support) 1
parts_pos {n hn} := by
rcases mem_add.mp hn with hn | hn
· exact zero_lt_one.trans (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn)
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (ge_of_eq (Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate hn))
parts_sum := by
rw [sum_add, sum_cycleType, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id, mul_one,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le σ.support.card_le_univ]
theorem parts_partition {σ : Perm α} :
σ.partition.parts = σ.cycleType + Multiset.replicate (Fintype.card α - #σ.support) 1 :=
rfl
theorem filter_parts_partition_eq_cycleType {σ : Perm α} :
((partition σ).parts.filter fun n => 2 ≤ n) = σ.cycleType := by
rw [parts_partition, filter_add, Multiset.filter_eq_self.2 fun _ => two_le_of_mem_cycleType,
Multiset.filter_eq_nil.2 fun a h => ?_, add_zero]
rw [Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate h]
decide
theorem partition_eq_of_isConj {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.partition = τ.partition := by
rw [isConj_iff_cycleType_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [Nat.Partition.ext_iff, parts_partition, parts_partition, ← sum_cycleType, ← sum_cycleType,
h]
· rw [← filter_parts_partition_eq_cycleType, ← filter_parts_partition_eq_cycleType, h]
end Partition
/-!
### 3-cycles
-/
/-- A three-cycle is a cycle of length 3. -/
def IsThreeCycle [DecidableEq α] (σ : Perm α) : Prop :=
σ.cycleType = {3}
namespace IsThreeCycle
variable [DecidableEq α] {σ : Perm α}
theorem cycleType (h : IsThreeCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {3} :=
h
theorem card_support (h : IsThreeCycle σ) : #σ.support = 3 := by
rw [← sum_cycleType, h.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
theorem _root_.card_support_eq_three_iff : #σ.support = 3 ↔ σ.IsThreeCycle := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, IsThreeCycle.card_support⟩
by_cases h0 : σ.cycleType = 0
· rw [← sum_cycleType, h0, sum_zero] at h
exact (ne_of_lt zero_lt_three h).elim
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_zero h0
by_cases h1 : σ.cycleType.erase n = 0
· rw [← sum_cycleType, ← cons_erase hn, h1, cons_zero, Multiset.sum_singleton] at h
rw [IsThreeCycle, ← cons_erase hn, h1, h, ← cons_zero]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_zero h1
rw [← sum_cycleType, ← cons_erase hn, ← cons_erase hm, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.sum_cons] at h
have : ∀ {k}, 2 ≤ m → 2 ≤ n → n + (m + k) = 3 → False := by omega
cases this (two_le_of_mem_cycleType (mem_of_mem_erase hm)) (two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn) h
theorem isCycle (h : IsThreeCycle σ) : IsCycle σ := by
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, h.cycleType, card_singleton]
theorem sign (h : IsThreeCycle σ) : sign σ = 1 := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sign_of_cycleType, h.cycleType]
rfl
theorem inv {f : Perm α} (h : IsThreeCycle f) : IsThreeCycle f⁻¹ := by
rwa [IsThreeCycle, cycleType_inv]
@[simp]
theorem inv_iff {f : Perm α} : IsThreeCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsThreeCycle f :=
⟨by
rw [← inv_inv f]
apply inv, inv⟩
theorem orderOf {g : Perm α} (ht : IsThreeCycle g) : orderOf g = 3 := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType, ht.cycleType, Multiset.lcm_singleton, normalize_eq]
|
theorem isThreeCycle_sq {g : Perm α} (ht : IsThreeCycle g) : IsThreeCycle (g * g) := by
rw [← pow_two, ← card_support_eq_three_iff, support_pow_coprime, ht.card_support]
rw [ht.orderOf]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 632 | 635 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul Lezeau, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FiberedCategory.HomLift
/-!
# Cartesian morphisms
This file defines cartesian resp. strongly cartesian morphisms with respect to a functor
`p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮`.
This file has been adapted to `FiberedCategory/Cocartesian`, please try to change them in sync.
## Main definitions
`IsCartesian p f φ` expresses that `φ` is a cartesian morphism lying over `f` with respect to `p` in
the sense of SGA 1 VI 5.1. This means that for any morphism `φ' : a' ⟶ b` lying over `f` there is
a unique morphism `τ : a' ⟶ a` lying over `𝟙 R`, such that `φ' = τ ≫ φ`.
`IsStronglyCartesian p f φ` expresses that `φ` is a strongly cartesian morphism lying over `f` with
respect to `p`, see <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02XK>.
## Implementation
The constructor of `IsStronglyCartesian` has been named `universal_property'`, and is mainly
intended to be used for constructing instances of this class. To use the universal property, we
generally recommended to use the lemma `IsStronglyCartesian.universal_property` instead. The
difference between the two is that the latter is more flexible with respect to non-definitional
equalities.
## References
* [A. Grothendieck, M. Raynaud, *SGA 1*](https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203)
* [Stacks: Fibred Categories](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02XJ)
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory Functor Category IsHomLift
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {𝒮 : Type u₁} {𝒳 : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} 𝒮] [Category.{v₂} 𝒳] (p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮)
section
variable {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b)
/-- A morphism `φ : a ⟶ b` in `𝒳` lying over `f : R ⟶ S` in `𝒮` is cartesian if for all
morphisms `φ' : a' ⟶ b`, also lying over `f`, there exists a unique morphism `χ : a' ⟶ a` lifting
`𝟙 R` such that `φ' = χ ≫ φ`.
See SGA 1 VI 5.1. -/
class IsCartesian : Prop extends IsHomLift p f φ where
universal_property {a' : 𝒳} (φ' : a' ⟶ b) [IsHomLift p f φ'] :
∃! χ : a' ⟶ a, IsHomLift p (𝟙 R) χ ∧ χ ≫ φ = φ'
/-- A morphism `φ : a ⟶ b` in `𝒳` lying over `f : R ⟶ S` in `𝒮` is strongly cartesian if for
all morphisms `φ' : a' ⟶ b` and all diagrams of the form
```
a' a --φ--> b
| | |
v v v
R' --g--> R --f--> S
```
such that `φ'` lifts `g ≫ f`, there exists a lift `χ` of `g` such that `φ' = χ ≫ φ`. -/
@[stacks 02XK]
class IsStronglyCartesian : Prop extends IsHomLift p f φ where
universal_property' {a' : 𝒳} (g : p.obj a' ⟶ R) (φ' : a' ⟶ b) [IsHomLift p (g ≫ f) φ'] :
∃! χ : a' ⟶ a, IsHomLift p g χ ∧ χ ≫ φ = φ'
end
| namespace IsCartesian
variable {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) [IsCartesian p f φ]
section
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/FiberedCategory/Cartesian.lean | 76 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Actions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Properties of group actions involving quotient groups
This file proves properties of group actions which use the quotient group construction, notably
* the orbit-stabilizer theorem `MulAction.card_orbit_mul_card_stabilizer_eq_card_group`
* the class formula `MulAction.card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer'`
* Burnside's lemma `MulAction.sum_card_fixedBy_eq_card_orbits_mul_card_group`,
as well as their analogues for additive groups.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function
namespace MulAction
variable [Group α]
section QuotientAction
open Subgroup MulOpposite QuotientGroup
variable (β) [Monoid β] [MulAction β α] (H : Subgroup α)
/-- A typeclass for when a `MulAction β α` descends to the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
class QuotientAction : Prop where
/-- The action fulfils a normality condition on products that lie in `H`.
This ensures that the action descends to an action on the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
inv_mul_mem : ∀ (b : β) {a a' : α}, a⁻¹ * a' ∈ H → (b • a)⁻¹ * b • a' ∈ H
/-- A typeclass for when an `AddAction β α` descends to the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
class _root_.AddAction.QuotientAction {α : Type u} (β : Type v) [AddGroup α] [AddMonoid β]
[AddAction β α] (H : AddSubgroup α) : Prop where
/-- The action fulfils a normality condition on summands that lie in `H`.
This ensures that the action descends to an action on the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
inv_mul_mem : ∀ (b : β) {a a' : α}, -a + a' ∈ H → -(b +ᵥ a) + (b +ᵥ a') ∈ H
attribute [to_additive] MulAction.QuotientAction
@[to_additive]
instance left_quotientAction : QuotientAction α H :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ => by rwa [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance right_quotientAction : QuotientAction (normalizer H).op H :=
⟨fun b c _ _ => by
rwa [smul_def, smul_def, smul_eq_mul_unop, smul_eq_mul_unop, mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc,
mem_normalizer_iff'.mp b.prop, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance right_quotientAction' [hH : H.Normal] : QuotientAction αᵐᵒᵖ H :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ => by
rwa [smul_eq_mul_unop, smul_eq_mul_unop, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, hH.mem_comm_iff, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance quotient [QuotientAction β H] : MulAction β (α ⧸ H) where
smul b :=
Quotient.map' (b • ·) fun _ _ h =>
leftRel_apply.mpr <| QuotientAction.inv_mul_mem b <| leftRel_apply.mp h
one_smul q := Quotient.inductionOn' q fun a => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' (one_smul β a)
mul_smul b b' q := Quotient.inductionOn' q fun a => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' (mul_smul b b' a)
variable {β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.smul_mk [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (a : α) :
(b • QuotientGroup.mk a : α ⧸ H) = QuotientGroup.mk (b • a) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.smul_coe [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (a : α) :
b • (a : α ⧸ H) = (↑(b • a) : α ⧸ H) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.mk_smul_out [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (q : α ⧸ H) :
QuotientGroup.mk (b • q.out) = b • q := by rw [← Quotient.smul_mk, QuotientGroup.out_eq']
@[to_additive]
theorem Quotient.coe_smul_out [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (q : α ⧸ H) : ↑(b • q.out) = b • q := by
simp
theorem _root_.QuotientGroup.out_conj_pow_minimalPeriod_mem (a : α) (q : α ⧸ H) :
q.out⁻¹ * a ^ Function.minimalPeriod (a • ·) q * q.out ∈ H := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← QuotientGroup.eq, QuotientGroup.out_eq', ← smul_eq_mul, Quotient.mk_smul_out,
eq_comm, pow_smul_eq_iff_minimalPeriod_dvd]
end QuotientAction
|
open QuotientGroup
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Quotient.lean | 108 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
(l.zipWith ((fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) (List.range l.length)).sum =
b * (l.zipWith (fun a i => a * b ^ i) (List.range l.length)).sum := by
suffices
l.zipWith (fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) (List.range l.length) =
l.zipWith (fun a i=> b * (a * b ^ i)) (List.range l.length)
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, List.zipIdx_eq_zip_range', List.map_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr, ← List.range_eq_range']
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_right, ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux] using
Or.inl hl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d List.mem_cons_self
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
rcases b with - | b
· rcases n with - | n
· rfl
· simp
· rcases b with - | b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n h => ?_
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· simp [IH, h]
aesop
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
lemma ofDigits_inj_of_len_eq {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {L1 L2 : List ℕ}
(len : L1.length = L2.length) (w1 : ∀ l ∈ L1, l < b) (w2 : ∀ l ∈ L2, l < b)
(h : ofDigits b L1 = ofDigits b L2) : L1 = L2 := by
induction' L1 with D L ih generalizing L2
· simp only [List.length_nil] at len
exact (List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp len.symm).symm
obtain ⟨d, l, rfl⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_length_eq_add_one len.symm
simp only [List.length_cons, add_left_inj] at len
simp only [ofDigits_cons] at h
have eqd : D = d := by
have H : (D + b * ofDigits b L) % b = (d + b * ofDigits b l) % b := by rw [h]
simpa [mod_eq_of_lt (w2 d List.mem_cons_self),
mod_eq_of_lt (w1 D List.mem_cons_self)] using H
simp only [eqd, add_right_inj, mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (zero_lt_of_lt hb)] at h
have := ih len (fun a ha ↦ w1 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem D ha)
(fun a ha ↦ w2 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem d ha) h
rw [eqd, this]
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them -/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero_iff, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro d hd
rcases n with - | n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by linarith)
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd List.mem_cons_self
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
theorem digits_base_pow_mul {b k m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b (b ^ k * m) = List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hmb : 0 < m * b := lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' hm hb
let h1 := digits_def' hb hmb
have h2 : m = m * b / b :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left (ne_zero_of_lt hb) rfl
simp only [mul_mod_left, ← h2] at h1
rw [List.replicate_succ', List.append_assoc, List.singleton_append, ← h1, ← ih hmb]
ring_nf
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_append_zeroes_append_digits {b k m n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b n ++ List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m =
digits b (n + b ^ ((digits b n).length + k) * m) := by
rw [List.append_assoc, ← digits_base_pow_mul hb hm]
simp only [digits_append_digits (zero_lt_of_lt hb), digits_inj_iff, add_right_inj]
ring
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp +arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| | cons _ _ hi =>
simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 476 | 482 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Buzzard, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
/-!
# Sheaves taking values in a category
If C is a category with a Grothendieck topology, we define the notion of a sheaf taking values in
an arbitrary category `A`. We follow the definition in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VR,
noting that the presheaf of sets "defined above" can be seen in the comments between tags 00VQ and
00VR on the page <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL>. The advantage of this definition is
that we need no assumptions whatsoever on `A` other than the assumption that the morphisms in `C`
and `A` live in the same universe.
* An `A`-valued presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is defined to be a sheaf (for the topology `J`) iff for
every `E : A`, the type-valued presheaves of sets given by sending `U : Cᵒᵖ` to `Hom_{A}(E, P U)`
are all sheaves of sets, see `CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf`.
* When `A = Type`, this recovers the basic definition of sheaves of sets, see
`CategoryTheory.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type`.
* A alternate definition in terms of limits, unconditionally equivalent to the original one:
see `CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isLimit`.
* An alternate definition when `C` is small, has pullbacks and `A` has products is given by an
equalizer condition `CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf'`. This is equivalent to the earlier
definition, shown in `CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf'`.
* When `A = Type`, this is *definitionally* equal to the equalizer condition for presieves in
`CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes`.
* When `A` has limits and there is a functor `s : A ⥤ Type` which is faithful, reflects isomorphisms
and preserves limits, then `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is a sheaf iff the underlying presheaf of types
`P ⋙ s : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type` is a sheaf (`CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_forget`).
Cf https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0073, which is a weaker version of this statement (it's
only over spaces, not sites) and https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YR (a), which
additionally assumes filtered colimits.
## Implementation notes
Occasionally we need to take a limit in `A` of a collection of morphisms of `C` indexed
by a collection of objects in `C`. This turns out to force the morphisms of `A` to be
in a sufficiently large universe. Rather than use `UnivLE` we prove some results for
a category `A'` instead, whose morphism universe of `A'` is defined to be `max u₁ v₁`, where
`u₁, v₁` are the universes for `C`. Perhaps after we get better at handling universe
inequalities this can be changed.
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
/-- A sheaf of A is a presheaf P : Cᵒᵖ => A such that for every E : A, the
presheaf of types given by sending U : C to Hom_{A}(E, P U) is a sheaf of types. -/
@[stacks 00VR]
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
/-- Condition that a presheaf with values in a concrete category is separated for
a Grothendieck topology. -/
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) {FA : A → A → Type*} {CA : A → Type*}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FA X Y) (CA X) (CA Y)] [ConcreteCategory A FA] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : ToType (P.obj (op X))),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
section LimitSheafCondition
open Presieve Presieve.FamilyOfElements Limits
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) {X : C} (S : Sieve X) (R : Presieve X) (E : Aᵒᵖ)
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, and an object `E` of `A`,
the cones over the natural diagram `S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P` associated to `S` and `P`
with cone point `E` are in 1-1 correspondence with sieve_compatible family of elements
for the sieve `S` and the presheaf of types `Hom (E, P -)`. -/
def conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily :
(S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P).cones.obj E ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) (S : Presieve X) // x.SieveCompatible } where
toFun π :=
⟨fun _ f h => π.app (op ⟨Over.mk f, h⟩), fun X Y f g hf => by
apply (id_comp _).symm.trans
dsimp
exact π.naturality (Quiver.Hom.op (Over.homMk _ (by rfl)))⟩
invFun x :=
{ app := fun f => x.1 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2
naturality := fun f f' g => by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (x.2 f.unop.1.hom g.unop.left f.unop.2)
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
convert rfl
rw [Over.w] }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
variable {P S E}
variable {x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows} (hx : SieveCompatible x)
/-- The cone corresponding to a sieve_compatible family of elements, dot notation enabled. -/
@[simp]
def _root_.CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone :
Cone (S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P) where
pt := E.unop
π := (conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S E).invFun ⟨x, hx⟩
/-- Cone morphisms from the cone corresponding to a sieve_compatible family to the natural
cone associated to a sieve `S` and a presheaf `P` are in 1-1 correspondence with amalgamations
of the family. -/
def homEquivAmalgamation :
(hx.cone ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op) ≃ { t // x.IsAmalgamation t } where
toFun l := ⟨l.hom, fun _ f hf => l.w (op ⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩)⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, fun f => t.2 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
variable (P S)
/-- Given sieve `S` and presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, their natural associated cone is a limit cone
iff `Hom (E, P -)` is a sheaf of types for the sieve `S` and all `E : A`. -/
theorem isLimit_iff_isSheafFor :
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSheafFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by
dsimp [IsSheafFor]; simp_rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
rw [((Cone.isLimitEquivIsTerminal _).trans (isTerminalEquivUnique _ _)).nonempty_congr]
rw [Classical.nonempty_pi]; constructor
· intro hu E x hx
specialize hu hx.cone
rw [(homEquivAmalgamation hx).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr] at hu
exact (unique_subtype_iff_existsUnique _).1 hu
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr]
rw [unique_subtype_iff_existsUnique]
exact h _ _ (eqv π).2
/-- Given sieve `S` and presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, their natural associated cone admits at most one
morphism from every cone in the same category (i.e. over the same diagram),
iff `Hom (E, P -)`is separated for the sieve `S` and all `E : A`. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_isSeparatedFor :
(∀ c, Subsingleton (c ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSeparatedFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by
constructor
· intro hs E x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂
have hx := is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation x ⟨t₁, h₁⟩
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at hx
specialize hs hx.cone
rcases hs with ⟨hs⟩
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq] using (show Subtype.mk t₁ h₁ = ⟨t₂, h₂⟩ from
(homEquivAmalgamation hx).symm.injective (hs _ _))
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
constructor
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
intro f₁ f₂
let eqv' := homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2
apply eqv'.injective
ext
apply h _ (eqv π).1 <;> exact (eqv' _).2
/-- A presheaf `P` is a sheaf for the Grothendieck topology `J` iff for every covering sieve
`S` of `J`, the natural cone associated to `P` and `S` is a limit cone. -/
theorem isSheaf_iff_isLimit :
IsSheaf J P ↔
∀ ⦃X : C⦄ (S : Sieve X), S ∈ J X → Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) :=
⟨fun h _ S hS => (isLimit_iff_isSheafFor P S).2 fun E => h E.unop S hS, fun h E _ S hS =>
(isLimit_iff_isSheafFor P S).1 (h S hS) (op E)⟩
/-- A presheaf `P` is separated for the Grothendieck topology `J` iff for every covering sieve
`S` of `J`, the natural cone associated to `P` and `S` admits at most one morphism from every
cone in the same category. -/
theorem isSeparated_iff_subsingleton :
(∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSeparated J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))) ↔
∀ ⦃X : C⦄ (S : Sieve X), S ∈ J X → ∀ c, Subsingleton (c ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op) :=
⟨fun h _ S hS => (subsingleton_iff_isSeparatedFor P S).2 fun E => h E.unop S hS, fun h E _ S hS =>
(subsingleton_iff_isSeparatedFor P S).1 (h S hS) (op E)⟩
/-- Given presieve `R` and presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, the natural cone associated to `P` and
the sieve `Sieve.generate R` generated by `R` is a limit cone iff `Hom (E, P -)` is a
sheaf of types for the presieve `R` and all `E : A`. -/
theorem isLimit_iff_isSheafFor_presieve :
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone (generate R).arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSheafFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) R :=
(isLimit_iff_isSheafFor P _).trans (forall_congr' fun _ => (isSheafFor_iff_generate _).symm)
/-- A presheaf `P` is a sheaf for the Grothendieck topology generated by a pretopology `K`
iff for every covering presieve `R` of `K`, the natural cone associated to `P` and
`Sieve.generate R` is a limit cone. -/
theorem isSheaf_iff_isLimit_pretopology [HasPullbacks C] (K : Pretopology C) :
IsSheaf (K.toGrothendieck C) P ↔
∀ ⦃X : C⦄ (R : Presieve X),
R ∈ K X → Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone (generate R).arrows.cocone.op)) := by
dsimp [IsSheaf]
simp_rw [isSheaf_pretopology]
exact
⟨fun h X R hR => (isLimit_iff_isSheafFor_presieve P R).2 fun E => h E.unop R hR,
fun h E X R hR => (isLimit_iff_isSheafFor_presieve P R).1 (h R hR) (op E)⟩
end LimitSheafCondition
variable {J}
/-- This is a wrapper around `Presieve.IsSheafFor.amalgamate` to be used below.
If `P`s a sheaf, `S` is a cover of `X`, and `x` is a collection of morphisms from `E`
to `P` evaluated at terms in the cover which are compatible, then we can amalgamate
the `x`s to obtain a single morphism `E ⟶ P.obj (op X)`. -/
def IsSheaf.amalgamate {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {E : A} {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A}
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) (S : J.Cover X) (x : ∀ I : S.Arrow, E ⟶ P.obj (op I.Y))
(hx : ∀ ⦃I₁ I₂ : S.Arrow⦄ (r : I₁.Relation I₂),
x I₁ ≫ P.map r.g₁.op = x I₂ ≫ P.map r.g₂.op) : E ⟶ P.obj (op X) :=
(hP _ _ S.condition).amalgamate (fun Y f hf => x ⟨Y, f, hf⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ w =>
@hx { hf := h₁, .. } { hf := h₂, .. } { w := w, .. }
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsSheaf.amalgamate_map {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {E : A} {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A}
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) (S : J.Cover X) (x : ∀ I : S.Arrow, E ⟶ P.obj (op I.Y))
(hx : ∀ ⦃I₁ I₂ : S.Arrow⦄ (r : I₁.Relation I₂),
x I₁ ≫ P.map r.g₁.op = x I₂ ≫ P.map r.g₂.op)
(I : S.Arrow) :
hP.amalgamate S x hx ≫ P.map I.f.op = x _ := by
apply (hP _ _ S.condition).valid_glue
theorem IsSheaf.hom_ext {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {E : A} {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A}
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) (S : J.Cover X) (e₁ e₂ : E ⟶ P.obj (op X))
(h : ∀ I : S.Arrow, e₁ ≫ P.map I.f.op = e₂ ≫ P.map I.f.op) : e₁ = e₂ :=
(hP _ _ S.condition).isSeparatedFor.ext fun Y f hf => h ⟨Y, f, hf⟩
lemma IsSheaf.hom_ext_ofArrows
{P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) {I : Type*} {S : C} {X : I → C}
(f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ S) (hf : Sieve.ofArrows _ f ∈ J S) {E : A}
{x y : E ⟶ P.obj (op S)} (h : ∀ i, x ≫ P.map (f i).op = y ≫ P.map (f i).op) :
x = y := by
apply hP.hom_ext ⟨_, hf⟩
rintro ⟨Z, _, _, g, _, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩
dsimp
rw [P.map_comp, reassoc_of% (h i)]
section
variable {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) {I : Type*} {S : C} {X : I → C}
(f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ S) (hf : Sieve.ofArrows _ f ∈ J S) {E : A}
(x : ∀ i, E ⟶ P.obj (op (X i)))
(hx : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ ⦃i j : I⦄ (a : W ⟶ X i) (b : W ⟶ X j),
a ≫ f i = b ≫ f j → x i ≫ P.map a.op = x j ≫ P.map b.op)
include hP hf hx
lemma IsSheaf.existsUnique_amalgamation_ofArrows :
∃! (g : E ⟶ P.obj (op S)), ∀ (i : I), g ≫ P.map (f i).op = x i :=
(Presieve.isSheafFor_arrows_iff _ _).1
((Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate _).2 (hP E _ hf)) x (fun _ _ _ _ _ w => hx _ _ w)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")]
alias IsSheaf.exists_unique_amalgamation_ofArrows := IsSheaf.existsUnique_amalgamation_ofArrows
/-- If `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is a sheaf and `f i : X i ⟶ S` is a covering family, then
a morphism `E ⟶ P.obj (op S)` can be constructed from a compatible family of
morphisms `x : E ⟶ P.obj (op (X i))`. -/
def IsSheaf.amalgamateOfArrows : E ⟶ P.obj (op S) :=
(hP.existsUnique_amalgamation_ofArrows f hf x hx).choose
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsSheaf.amalgamateOfArrows_map (i : I) :
hP.amalgamateOfArrows f hf x hx ≫ P.map (f i).op = x i :=
(hP.existsUnique_amalgamation_ofArrows f hf x hx).choose_spec.1 i
end
theorem isSheaf_of_iso_iff {P P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (e : P ≅ P') : IsSheaf J P ↔ IsSheaf J P' :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨Presieve.isSheaf_iso J (isoWhiskerRight e _),
Presieve.isSheaf_iso J (isoWhiskerRight e.symm _)⟩
variable (J)
theorem isSheaf_of_isTerminal {X : A} (hX : IsTerminal X) :
Presheaf.IsSheaf J ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const _).obj X) := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ =>
⟨hX.from _, fun _ _ _ => hX.hom_ext _ _, fun _ _ => hX.hom_ext _ _⟩
end Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable (A : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} A]
/-- The category of sheaves taking values in `A` on a grothendieck topology. -/
structure Sheaf where
/-- the underlying presheaf -/
val : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A
/-- the condition that the presheaf is a sheaf -/
cond : Presheaf.IsSheaf J val
namespace Sheaf
variable {J A}
/-- Morphisms between sheaves are just morphisms of presheaves. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (X Y : Sheaf J A) where
/-- a morphism between the underlying presheaves -/
val : X.val ⟶ Y.val
@[simps id_val comp_val]
instance instCategorySheaf : Category (Sheaf J A) where
Hom := Hom
id _ := ⟨𝟙 _⟩
comp f g := ⟨f.val ≫ g.val⟩
id_comp _ := Hom.ext <| id_comp _
comp_id _ := Hom.ext <| comp_id _
assoc _ _ _ := Hom.ext <| assoc _ _ _
-- Let's make the inhabited linter happy.../sips
instance (X : Sheaf J A) : Inhabited (Hom X X) :=
⟨𝟙 X⟩
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : Sheaf J A} (x y : X ⟶ Y) (h : x.val = y.val) : x = y :=
Sheaf.Hom.ext h
end Sheaf
/-- The inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves. -/
@[simps]
def sheafToPresheaf : Sheaf J A ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A where
obj := Sheaf.val
map f := f.val
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
/-- The sections of a sheaf (i.e. evaluation as a presheaf on `C`). -/
abbrev sheafSections : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Sheaf J A ⥤ A := (sheafToPresheaf J A).flip
/-- The sheaf sections functor on `X` is given by evaluation of presheaves on `X`. -/
@[simps!]
def sheafSectionsNatIsoEvaluation {X : C} :
(sheafSections J A).obj (op X) ≅ sheafToPresheaf J A ⋙ (evaluation _ _).obj (op X) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
/-- The functor `Sheaf J A ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is fully faithful. -/
@[simps]
def fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf : (sheafToPresheaf J A).FullyFaithful where
preimage f := ⟨f⟩
variable {J A} in
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X.val ⟶ Y.val)` when `X` and `Y` are sheaves. -/
abbrev Sheaf.homEquiv {X Y : Sheaf J A} : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X.val ⟶ Y.val) :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).homEquiv
instance : (sheafToPresheaf J A).Full :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).full
instance : (sheafToPresheaf J A).Faithful :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).faithful
instance : (sheafToPresheaf J A).ReflectsIsomorphisms :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).reflectsIsomorphisms
/-- This is stated as a lemma to prevent class search from forming a loop since a sheaf morphism is
monic if and only if it is monic as a presheaf morphism (under suitable assumption). -/
theorem Sheaf.Hom.mono_of_presheaf_mono {F G : Sheaf J A} (f : F ⟶ G) [h : Mono f.1] : Mono f :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).mono_of_mono_map h
instance Sheaf.Hom.epi_of_presheaf_epi {F G : Sheaf J A} (f : F ⟶ G) [h : Epi f.1] : Epi f :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).epi_of_epi_map h
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) :
Presheaf.IsSheaf J P ↔ Presieve.IsSheaf J P := by
constructor
· intro hP
refine Presieve.isSheaf_iso J ?_ (hP PUnit)
exact isoWhiskerLeft _ Coyoneda.punitIso ≪≫ P.rightUnitor
· intro hP X Y S hS z hz
refine ⟨fun x => (hP S hS).amalgamate (fun Z f hf => z f hf x) ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ h
exact congr_fun (hz g₁ g₂ hf₁ hf₂ h) x
· intro Z f hf
funext x
apply Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue
· intro y hy
funext x
apply (hP S hS).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y' f hf
rw [Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ hf, ← hy _ hf]
rfl
/-- The sheaf of sections guaranteed by the sheaf condition. -/
@[simps]
def sheafOver {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {J : GrothendieckTopology C} (ℱ : Sheaf J A) (E : A) :
Sheaf J (Type _) where
val := ℱ.val ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E)
cond := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type]
exact ℱ.cond E
variable {J} in
lemma Presheaf.IsSheaf.isSheafFor {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P)
{X : C} (S : Sieve X) (hS : S ∈ J X) : Presieve.IsSheafFor P S.arrows := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type] at hP
exact hP S hS
variable {A} in
lemma Presheaf.isSheaf_bot (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : IsSheaf ⊥ P := fun _ ↦ Presieve.isSheaf_bot
/--
The category of sheaves on the bottom (trivial) Grothendieck topology is
equivalent to the category of presheaves.
-/
@[simps]
def sheafBotEquivalence : Sheaf (⊥ : GrothendieckTopology C) A ≌ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A where
functor := sheafToPresheaf _ _
inverse :=
{ obj := fun P => ⟨P, Presheaf.isSheaf_bot P⟩
map := fun f => ⟨f⟩ }
unitIso := Iso.refl _
counitIso := Iso.refl _
instance : Inhabited (Sheaf (⊥ : GrothendieckTopology C) (Type w)) :=
⟨(sheafBotEquivalence _).inverse.obj ((Functor.const _).obj default)⟩
variable {J} {A}
/-- If the empty sieve is a cover of `X`, then `F(X)` is terminal. -/
def Sheaf.isTerminalOfBotCover (F : Sheaf J A) (X : C) (H : ⊥ ∈ J X) :
IsTerminal (F.1.obj (op X)) := by
refine @IsTerminal.ofUnique _ _ _ ?_
intro Y
choose t h using F.2 Y _ H (by tauto) (by tauto)
exact ⟨⟨t⟩, fun a => h.2 a (by tauto)⟩
section Preadditive
open Preadditive
variable [Preadditive A] {P Q : Sheaf J A}
instance sheafHomHasZSMul : SMul ℤ (P ⟶ Q) where
smul n f :=
Sheaf.Hom.mk
{ app := fun U => n • f.1.app U
naturality := fun U V i => by
induction' n with n ih n ih
· simp only [zero_smul, comp_zero, zero_comp]
· simpa only [add_zsmul, one_zsmul, comp_add, NatTrans.naturality, add_comp,
add_left_inj]
· simpa only [sub_smul, one_zsmul, comp_sub, NatTrans.naturality, sub_comp,
sub_left_inj] using ih }
instance : Sub (P ⟶ Q) where sub f g := Sheaf.Hom.mk <| f.1 - g.1
instance : Neg (P ⟶ Q) where neg f := Sheaf.Hom.mk <| -f.1
instance sheafHomHasNSMul : SMul ℕ (P ⟶ Q) where
smul n f :=
Sheaf.Hom.mk
{ app := fun U => n • f.1.app U
naturality := fun U V i => by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [zero_smul, comp_zero, zero_comp]
| succ n ih => simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, ih, one_nsmul, comp_add,
NatTrans.naturality, add_comp] }
instance : Zero (P ⟶ Q) where zero := Sheaf.Hom.mk 0
instance : Add (P ⟶ Q) where add f g := Sheaf.Hom.mk <| f.1 + g.1
@[simp]
theorem Sheaf.Hom.add_app (f g : P ⟶ Q) (U) : (f + g).1.app U = f.1.app U + g.1.app U :=
rfl
instance Sheaf.Hom.addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (P ⟶ Q) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup (fun f : Sheaf.Hom P Q => f.1)
(fun _ _ h => Sheaf.Hom.ext h) rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => by aesop_cat) (fun _ _ => by aesop_cat)
instance : Preadditive (Sheaf J A) where
homGroup _ _ := Sheaf.Hom.addCommGroup
end Preadditive
end CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
-- Under here is the equalizer story, which is equivalent if A has products (and doesn't
-- make sense otherwise). It's described in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL,
-- between 00VQ and 00VR.
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
-- `A` is a general category; `A'` is a variant where the morphisms live in a large enough
-- universe to guarantee that we can take limits in A of things coming from C.
-- I would have liked to use something like `UnivLE.{max v₁ u₁, v₂}` as a hypothesis on
-- `A`'s morphism universe rather than introducing `A'` but I can't get it to work.
-- So, for now, results which need max v₁ u₁ ≤ v₂ are just stated for `A'` and `P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A'`
-- instead.
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable {A' : Type u₂} [Category.{max v₁ u₁} A']
variable {B : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} B]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {U : C} (R : Presieve U)
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) (P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A')
section MultiequalizerConditions
/-- When `P` is a sheaf and `S` is a cover, the associated multifork is a limit. -/
def isLimitOfIsSheaf {X : C} (S : J.Cover X) (hP : IsSheaf J P) : IsLimit (S.multifork P) where
lift := fun E : Multifork _ => hP.amalgamate S (fun _ => E.ι _)
(fun _ _ r => E.condition ⟨r⟩)
fac := by
rintro (E : Multifork _) (a | b)
· apply hP.amalgamate_map
· rw [← E.w (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b),
← (S.multifork P).w (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b), ← assoc]
congr 1
apply hP.amalgamate_map
uniq := by
rintro (E : Multifork _) m hm
apply hP.hom_ext S
intro I
erw [hm (WalkingMulticospan.left I)]
symm
apply hP.amalgamate_map
theorem isSheaf_iff_multifork :
IsSheaf J P ↔ ∀ (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), Nonempty (IsLimit (S.multifork P)) := by
refine ⟨fun hP X S => ⟨isLimitOfIsSheaf _ _ _ hP⟩, ?_⟩
intro h E X S hS x hx
let T : J.Cover X := ⟨S, hS⟩
obtain ⟨hh⟩ := h _ T
let K : Multifork (T.index P) := Multifork.ofι _ E (fun I => x I.f I.hf)
(fun I => hx _ _ _ _ I.r.w)
use hh.lift K
dsimp; constructor
· intro Y f hf
apply hh.fac K (WalkingMulticospan.left ⟨Y, f, hf⟩)
· intro e he
apply hh.uniq K
rintro (a | b)
· apply he
· rw [← K.w (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b), ←
(T.multifork P).w (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b), ← assoc]
congr 1
apply he
variable {J P} in
/-- If `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is a sheaf for a Grothendieck topology `J` on `C`,
and `S` is a cover of `X : C`, then the multifork `S.multifork F` is limit. -/
def IsSheaf.isLimitMultifork
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) {X : C} (S : J.Cover X) : IsLimit (S.multifork P) := by
rw [Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_multifork] at hP
exact (hP X S).some
theorem isSheaf_iff_multiequalizer [∀ (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)] :
IsSheaf J P ↔ ∀ (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), IsIso (S.toMultiequalizer P) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_multifork]
refine forall₂_congr fun X S => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨h⟩
let e : P.obj (op X) ≅ multiequalizer (S.index P) :=
h.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _)
exact (inferInstance : IsIso e.hom)
· intro h
refine ⟨IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Cones.ext ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h).symm
· intro a
symm
simp
end MultiequalizerConditions
section
variable [HasProducts.{max u₁ v₁} A]
variable [HasProducts.{max u₁ v₁} A']
/-- The middle object of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork
diagram of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "The middle object of the fork diagram there."]
def firstObj : A :=
∏ᶜ fun f : ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)
/-- The left morphism of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork
diagram of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "The left morphism the fork diagram there."]
def forkMap : P.obj (op U) ⟶ firstObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun f => P.map f.2.1.op
variable [HasPullbacks C]
/-- The rightmost object of the fork diagram of the Stacks entry, which
contains the data used to check a family of elements for a presieve is compatible.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "The rightmost object of the fork diagram there."]
def secondObj : A :=
∏ᶜ fun fg : (ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) × ΣW, { g : W ⟶ U // R g } =>
P.obj (op (pullback fg.1.2.1 fg.2.2.1))
/-- The map `pr₀*` of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "The map `pr₀*` there."]
def firstMap : firstObj R P ⟶ secondObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.fst _ _).op
/-- The map `pr₁*` of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "The map `pr₁*` there."]
def secondMap : firstObj R P ⟶ secondObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.snd _ _).op
theorem w : forkMap R P ≫ firstMap R P = forkMap R P ≫ secondMap R P := by
apply limit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩, ⟨Z, g, hg⟩⟩
simp only [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, assoc, Fan.mk_π_app,
Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, pullback.condition]
simp
/-- An alternative definition of the sheaf condition in terms of equalizers. This is shown to be
equivalent in `CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf'`.
-/
def IsSheaf' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ (U : C) (R : Presieve U) (_ : generate R ∈ J U), Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (w R P)))
-- Again I wonder whether `UnivLE` can somehow be used to allow `s` to take
-- values in a more general universe.
/-- (Implementation). An auxiliary lemma to convert between sheaf conditions. -/
def isSheafForIsSheafFor' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) (s : A ⥤ Type max v₁ u₁)
[∀ J, PreservesLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{max v₁ u₁} J) s] (U : C) (R : Presieve U) :
IsLimit (s.mapCone (Fork.ofι _ (w R P))) ≃
IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (Equalizer.Presieve.w (P ⋙ s) R)) := by
let e : parallelPair (s.map (firstMap R P)) (s.map (secondMap R P)) ≅
parallelPair (Equalizer.Presieve.firstMap (P ⋙ s) R)
(Equalizer.Presieve.secondMap (P ⋙ s) R) := by
refine parallelPair.ext (PreservesProduct.iso s _) ((PreservesProduct.iso s _))
(limit.hom_ext (fun j => ?_)) (limit.hom_ext (fun j => ?_))
· dsimp [Equalizer.Presieve.firstMap, firstMap]
simp only [map_lift_piComparison, Functor.map_comp, limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_pt,
Fan.mk_π_app, assoc, piComparison_comp_π_assoc]
· dsimp [Equalizer.Presieve.secondMap, secondMap]
simp only [map_lift_piComparison, Functor.map_comp, limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_pt,
Fan.mk_π_app, assoc, piComparison_comp_π_assoc]
refine Equiv.trans (isLimitMapConeForkEquiv _ _) ?_
refine (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv e _).symm.trans
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_))
dsimp [Equalizer.forkMap, forkMap, e, Fork.ι]
simp only [id_comp, map_lift_piComparison]
-- Remark : this lemma uses `A'` not `A`; `A'` is `A` but with a universe
-- restriction. Can it be generalised?
/-- The equalizer definition of a sheaf given by `isSheaf'` is equivalent to `isSheaf`. -/
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf' : IsSheaf J P' ↔ IsSheaf' J P' := by
constructor
· intro h U R hR
refine ⟨?_⟩
apply coyonedaJointlyReflectsLimits
intro X
have q : Presieve.IsSheafFor (P' ⋙ coyoneda.obj X) _ := h X.unop _ hR
rw [← Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate] at q
rw [Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition] at q
replace q := Classical.choice q
apply (isSheafForIsSheafFor' _ _ _ _).symm q
· intro h U X S hS
rw [Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition]
refine ⟨?_⟩
refine isSheafForIsSheafFor' _ _ _ _ ?_
letI := preservesSmallestLimits_of_preservesLimits (coyoneda.obj (op U))
apply isLimitOfPreserves
apply Classical.choice (h _ S.arrows _)
simpa
end
section Concrete
theorem isSheaf_of_isSheaf_comp (s : A ⥤ B) [ReflectsLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} s]
(h : IsSheaf J (P ⋙ s)) : IsSheaf J P := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isLimit] at h ⊢
exact fun X S hS ↦ (h S hS).map fun t ↦ isLimitOfReflects s t
theorem isSheaf_comp_of_isSheaf (s : A ⥤ B) [PreservesLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} s]
(h : IsSheaf J P) : IsSheaf J (P ⋙ s) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isLimit] at h ⊢
apply fun X S hS ↦ (h S hS).map fun t ↦ isLimitOfPreserves s t
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp (s : A ⥤ B) [HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} A]
[PreservesLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} s] [s.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
IsSheaf J P ↔ IsSheaf J (P ⋙ s) := by
letI : ReflectsLimitsOfSize s := reflectsLimits_of_reflectsIsomorphisms
exact ⟨isSheaf_comp_of_isSheaf J P s, isSheaf_of_isSheaf_comp J P s⟩
|
/--
For a concrete category `(A, s)` where the forgetful functor `s : A ⥤ Type v` preserves limits and
reflects isomorphisms, and `A` has limits, an `A`-valued presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is a sheaf iff its
underlying `Type`-valued presheaf `P ⋙ s : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type` is a sheaf.
Note this lemma applies for "algebraic" categories, eg groups, abelian groups and rings, but not
for the category of topological spaces, topological rings, etc since reflecting isomorphisms doesn't
hold.
-/
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_forget (s : A' ⥤ Type max v₁ u₁) [HasLimits A'] [PreservesLimits s]
[s.ReflectsIsomorphisms] : IsSheaf J P' ↔ IsSheaf J (P' ⋙ s) := by
have : HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} A' := hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{_, _, u₁, 0} A'
have : PreservesLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} s := preservesLimitsOfSize_shrink.{_, 0, _, u₁} s
apply isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
end Concrete
end Presheaf
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 705 | 723 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDenseLp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lemmas
/-!
# Finitely strongly measurable functions in `Lp`
Functions in `Lp` for `0 < p < ∞` are finitely strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MemLp.aefinStronglyMeasurable`: if `MemLp f p μ` with `0 < p < ∞`, then
`AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`.
* `Lp.finStronglyMeasurable`: for `0 < p < ∞`, `Lp` functions are finitely strongly measurable.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α G : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup G]
{f : α → G}
theorem MemLp.finStronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable (hf : MemLp f p μ)
| (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
borelize G
haveI : SeparableSpace (Set.range f ∪ {0} : Set G) :=
hf_meas.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let fs := SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf_meas.measurable (Set.range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
refine ⟨fs, ?_, ?_⟩
· have h_fs_Lp : ∀ n, MemLp (fs n) p μ :=
SimpleFunc.memLp_approxOn_range hf_meas.measurable hf
exact fun n => (fs n).measure_support_lt_top_of_memLp (h_fs_Lp n) hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· intro x
apply SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn
apply subset_closure
simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Lp.lean | 40 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Combination
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Extreme
/-!
# Convex independence
This file defines convex independent families of points.
Convex independence is closely related to affine independence. In both cases, no point can be
written as a combination of others. When the combination is affine (that is, any coefficients), this
yields affine independence. When the combination is convex (that is, all coefficients are
nonnegative), then this yields convex independence. In particular, affine independence implies
convex independence.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexIndependent p`: Convex independence of the indexed family `p : ι → E`. Every point of the
family only belongs to convex hulls of sets of the family containing it.
* `convexIndependent_iff_finset`: Carathéodory's theorem allows us to only check finsets to
conclude convex independence.
* `Convex.convexIndependent_extremePoints`: Extreme points of a convex set are convex independent.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_position
## TODO
Prove `AffineIndependent.convexIndependent`. This requires some glue between `affineCombination`
and `Finset.centerMass`.
## Tags
independence, convex position
-/
open Affine Finset Function
variable {𝕜 E ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable (𝕜) [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- An indexed family is said to be convex independent if every point only belongs to convex hulls
of sets containing it. -/
def ConvexIndependent (p : ι → E) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Set ι) (x : ι), p x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (p '' s) → x ∈ s
variable {𝕜}
/-- A family with at most one point is convex independent. -/
theorem Subsingleton.convexIndependent [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → E) : ConvexIndependent 𝕜 p := by
intro s x hx
have : (convexHull 𝕜 (p '' s)).Nonempty := ⟨p x, hx⟩
rw [convexHull_nonempty_iff, Set.image_nonempty] at this
rwa [Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty]
| /-- A convex independent family is injective. -/
protected theorem ConvexIndependent.injective {p : ι → E} (hc : ConvexIndependent 𝕜 p) :
Function.Injective p := by
refine fun i j hij => hc {j} i ?_
rw [hij, Set.image_singleton, convexHull_singleton]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Independent.lean | 65 | 69 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.