Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Map
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Pointwise operations on filters
This file defines pointwise operations on filters. This is useful because usual algebraic operations
distribute over pointwise operations. For example,
* `(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m`
* `𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y`
## Main declarations
* `0` (`Filter.instZero`): Pure filter at `0 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `0 : Set α`.
* `1` (`Filter.instOne`): Pure filter at `1 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `1 : Set α`.
* `f + g` (`Filter.instAdd`): Addition, filter generated by all `s + t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f * g` (`Filter.instMul`): Multiplication, filter generated by all `s * t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `-f` (`Filter.instNeg`): Negation, filter of all `-s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f⁻¹` (`Filter.instInv`): Inversion, filter of all `s⁻¹` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f - g` (`Filter.instSub`): Subtraction, filter generated by all `s - t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f / g` (`Filter.instDiv`): Division, filter generated by all `s / t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f +ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVAdd`): Scalar addition, filter generated by all `s +ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f -ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVSub`): Scalar subtraction, filter generated by all `s -ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f`
and `t ∈ g`.
* `f • g` (`Filter.instSMul`): Scalar multiplication, filter generated by all `s • t` where
`s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `a +ᵥ f` (`Filter.instVAddFilter`): Translation, filter of all `a +ᵥ s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `a • f` (`Filter.instSMulFilter`): Scaling, filter of all `a • s` where `s ∈ f`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Filter α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • f`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition. See note [pointwise nat action].
## Implementation notes
We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`).
## Tags
filter multiplication, filter addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
-/
open Function Set Filter Pointwise
variable {F α β γ δ ε : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-! ### `0`/`1` as filters -/
section One
variable [One α] {f : Filter α} {s : Set α}
/-- `1 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `1 : α` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"`0 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `0 : α` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instOne : One (Filter α) :=
⟨pure 1⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instOne Filter.instZero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : s ∈ (1 : Filter α) ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
mem_pure
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : Set α) ∈ (1 : Filter α) :=
mem_pure.2 Set.one_mem_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_one : pure 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_prod]
theorem one_prod {l : Filter β} : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ l = map (1, ·) l := pure_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_zero]
theorem prod_one {l : Filter β} : l ×ˢ (1 : Filter α) = map (·, 1) l := prod_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem principal_one : 𝓟 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
principal_singleton _
@[to_additive]
theorem one_neBot : (1 : Filter α).NeBot :=
Filter.pure_neBot
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] one_neBot zero_neBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_one' (f : α → β) : (1 : Filter α).map f = pure (f 1) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_one_iff : f ≤ 1 ↔ (1 : Set α) ∈ f :=
le_pure_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.le_one_iff (h : f.NeBot) : f ≤ 1 ↔ f = 1 :=
h.le_pure_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventually_one {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 1, p x) ↔ p 1 :=
eventually_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tendsto_one {a : Filter β} {f : β → α} : Tendsto f a 1 ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = 1 :=
tendsto_pure
@[to_additive zero_prod_zero]
theorem one_prod_one [One β] : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ (1 : Filter β) = 1 :=
prod_pure_pure
/-- `pure` as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as a `ZeroHom`."]
def pureOneHom : OneHom α (Filter α) where
toFun := pure; map_one' := pure_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureOneHom : (pureOneHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureOneHom_apply (a : α) : pureOneHom a = pure a :=
rfl
variable [One β]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_one [FunLike F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : map φ 1 = 1 := by
simp
end One
/-! ### Filter negation/inversion -/
section Inv
variable [Inv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α}
/-- The inverse of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `⁻¹` of its sets. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `-` of its sets."]
instance instInv : Inv (Filter α) :=
⟨map Inv.inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_inv : f.map Inv.inv = f⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv : s ∈ f⁻¹ ↔ Inv.inv ⁻¹' s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_le_inv (hf : f ≤ g) : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ :=
map_mono hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_pure : (pure a : Filter α)⁻¹ = pure a⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_bot_iff : f⁻¹ = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem neBot_inv_iff : f⁻¹.NeBot ↔ NeBot f :=
map_neBot_iff _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.inv : f.NeBot → f⁻¹.NeBot := fun h => h.map _
@[to_additive neg.instNeBot]
lemma inv.instNeBot [NeBot f] : NeBot f⁻¹ := .inv ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] inv.instNeBot neg.instNeBot
end Inv
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected lemma comap_inv : comap Inv.inv f = f⁻¹ :=
.symm <| map_eq_comap_of_inverse (inv_comp_inv _) (inv_comp_inv _)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv (hs : s ∈ f) : s⁻¹ ∈ f⁻¹ := by rwa [mem_inv, inv_preimage, inv_inv]
/-- Inversion is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "Negation is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`."]
protected def instInvolutiveInv : InvolutiveInv (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInv with
inv_inv := fun f => map_map.trans <| by rw [inv_involutive.comp_self, map_id] }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instInvolutiveInv Filter.instInvolutiveNeg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem inv_le_inv_iff : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv f ▸ inv_inv g ▸ Filter.inv_le_inv h, Filter.inv_le_inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_inv : f⁻¹ ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g⁻¹ := by rw [← Filter.inv_le_inv_iff, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self : f⁻¹ ≤ f ↔ f⁻¹ = f :=
⟨fun h => h.antisymm <| inv_le_iff_le_inv.1 h, Eq.le⟩
end InvolutiveInv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_atTop {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] :
(atTop : Filter G)⁻¹ = atBot :=
(OrderIso.inv G).map_atTop
/-! ### Filter addition/multiplication -/
section Mul
variable [Mul α] [Mul β] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f * g` is generated by `{s * t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f + g` is generated by `{s + t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instMul : Mul (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· * ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s` rather
than all the way to `Set.image2 (· * ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· * ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instMul Filter.instAdd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_mul : map₂ (· * ·) f g = f * g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_mul : s ∈ f * g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s * t ∈ f * g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_bot : f * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_bot_iff : f * g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] -- TODO: make this a scoped instance in the `Pointwise` namespace
lemma mul_neBot_iff : (f * g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.mul : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f * g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_left : (f * g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_right : (f * g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive add.instNeBot]
protected lemma mul.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f * g) := .mul ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] mul.instNeBot add.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_mul : pure a * g = g.map (a * ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_pure : f * pure b = f.map (· * b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_mul_pure : (pure a : Filter α) * pure b = pure (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_iff : h ≤ f * g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s * t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_mul [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) :
(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m :=
map_map₂_distrib <| map_mul m
/-- `pure` operation as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddHom`."]
def pureMulHom : α →ₙ* Filter α where
toFun := pure; map_mul' _ _ := pure_mul_pure.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMulHom : (pureMulHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMulHom_apply (a : α) : pureMulHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end Mul
/-! ### Filter subtraction/division -/
section Div
variable [Div α] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f / g` is generated by `{s / t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f - g` is generated by `{s - t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instDiv : Div (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· / ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s`
rather than all the way to `Set.image2 (· / ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· / ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instDiv Filter.instSub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_div : map₂ (· / ·) f g = f / g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_div : s ∈ f / g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s / t ∈ f / g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_div : ⊥ / g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_bot : f / ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_bot_iff : f / g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_neBot_iff : (f / g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.div : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f / g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_left : (f / g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_right : (f / g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive sub.instNeBot]
lemma div.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f / g) := .div ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] div.instNeBot sub.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_div : pure a / g = g.map (a / ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_pure : f / pure b = f.map (· / b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_div_pure : (pure a : Filter α) / pure b = pure (a / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div : f₁ ≤ f₂ → g₁ ≤ g₂ → f₁ / g₁ ≤ f₂ / g₂ :=
map₂_mono
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_left : g₁ ≤ g₂ → f / g₁ ≤ f / g₂ :=
map₂_mono_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_right : f₁ ≤ f₂ → f₁ / g ≤ f₂ / g :=
map₂_mono_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem le_div_iff : h ≤ f / g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s / t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (· / ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_swap_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (swap (· / ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
end Div
open Pointwise
/-- Repeated pointwise addition (not the same as pointwise repeated addition!) of a `Filter`. See
Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instNSMul [Zero α] [Add α] : SMul ℕ (Filter α) :=
⟨nsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication (not the same as pointwise repeated multiplication!) of a
`Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instNPow [One α] [Mul α] : Pow (Filter α) ℕ :=
⟨fun s n => npowRec n s⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise addition/subtraction (not the same as pointwise repeated
addition/subtraction!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instZSMul [Zero α] [Add α] [Neg α] : SMul ℤ (Filter α) :=
⟨zsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication/division (not the same as pointwise repeated
multiplication/division!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instZPow [One α] [Mul α] [Inv α] : Pow (Filter α) ℤ :=
⟨fun s n => zpowRec npowRec n s⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instNSMul Filter.instNPow
Filter.instZSMul Filter.instZPow
/-- `Filter α` is a `Semigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def semigroup [Semigroup α] : Semigroup (Filter α) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := map₂_assoc mul_assoc
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commSemigroup [CommSemigroup α] : CommSemigroup (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.semigroup with mul_comm := fun _ _ => map₂_comm mul_comm }
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β]
/-- `Filter α` is a `MulOneClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddZeroClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def mulOneClass : MulOneClass (Filter α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
one_mul := map₂_left_identity one_mul
mul_one := map₂_right_identity mul_one
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.semigroup Filter.addSemigroup
Filter.commSemigroup Filter.addCommSemigroup Filter.mulOneClass Filter.addZeroClass
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- If `φ : α →* β` then `mapMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →* Filter β` induced by `map φ`. -/
@[to_additive "If `φ : α →+ β` then `mapAddMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →+ Filter β` induced by `map φ`."]
def mapMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : Filter α →* Filter β where
toFun := map φ
map_one' := Filter.map_one φ
map_mul' _ _ := Filter.map_mul φ
-- The other direction does not hold in general
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_mul_comap_le [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f g : Filter β} :
f.comap m * g.comap m ≤ (f * g).comap m := fun _ ⟨_, ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, t₁t₂⟩, mt⟩ =>
⟨m ⁻¹' t₁, ⟨t₁, ht₁, Subset.rfl⟩, m ⁻¹' t₂, ⟨t₂, ht₂, Subset.rfl⟩,
(preimage_mul_preimage_subset _).trans <| (preimage_mono t₁t₂).trans mt⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Tendsto.mul_mul [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto m f₁ f₂ → Tendsto m g₁ g₂ → Tendsto m (f₁ * g₁) (f₂ * g₂) := fun hf hg =>
(Filter.map_mul m).trans_le <| mul_le_mul' hf hg
/-- `pure` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α :=
{ pureMulHom, pureOneHom with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMonoidHom : (pureMonoidHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : pureMonoidHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- `Filter α` is a `Monoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def monoid : Monoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.semigroup, @Filter.instNPow α _ _ with }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.monoid Filter.addMonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_pow (hs : s ∈ f) : ∀ n : ℕ, s ^ n ∈ f ^ n
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact one_mem_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_mem_mul (pow_mem_pow hs n) hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_bot]
theorem bot_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (⊥ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊥ := by
rw [← Nat.sub_one_add_one hn, pow_succ', bot_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_top_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : f * ⊤ = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [mul_univ_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem top_mul_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : ⊤ * f = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [univ_mul_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_mul_top : (⊤ : Filter α) * ⊤ = ⊤ :=
mul_top_of_one_le le_top
@[to_additive nsmul_top]
theorem top_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (⊤ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊤
| 0 => fun h => (h rfl).elim
| 1 => fun _ => pow_one _
| n + 2 => fun _ => by rw [pow_succ, top_pow n.succ_ne_zero, top_mul_top]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem _root_.IsUnit.filter : IsUnit a → IsUnit (pure a : Filter α) :=
IsUnit.map (pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α)
end Monoid
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commMonoid [CommMonoid α] : CommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.commSemigroup with }
open Pointwise
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {f g : Filter α}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_eq_one_iff : f * g = 1 ↔ ∃ a b, f = pure a ∧ g = pure b ∧ a * b = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, h⟩ : (1 : Set α) ∈ f * g := hfg.symm ▸ one_mem_one
have hfg : (f * g).NeBot := hfg.symm.subst one_neBot
rw [(hfg.nonempty_of_mem <| mul_mem_mul h₁ h₂).subset_one_iff, Set.mul_eq_one_iff] at h
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a, b, ?_, ?_, h⟩
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_left.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_right.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rintro ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩
rw [pure_mul_pure, h, pure_one]
/-- `Filter α` is a division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is a subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if
`α` is."]
protected def divisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.monoid, Filter.instInvolutiveInv, Filter.instDiv, Filter.instZPow (α := α) with
mul_inv_rev := fun _ _ => map_map₂_antidistrib mul_inv_rev
inv_eq_of_mul := fun s t h => by
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, hab⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 h
rw [inv_pure, inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right hab]
div_eq_mul_inv := fun _ _ => map_map₂_distrib_right div_eq_mul_inv }
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit f ↔ ∃ a, f = pure a ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, h⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.mul_inv
refine ⟨a, ha, ⟨a, b, h, pure_injective ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← pure_mul_pure, ← ha, ← hb]
exact u.inv_mul
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, ha⟩
exact ha.filter
end DivisionMonoid
/-- `Filter α` is a commutative division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive subtractionCommMonoid
"`Filter α` is a commutative subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def divisionCommMonoid [DivisionCommMonoid α] : DivisionCommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.divisionMonoid, Filter.commSemigroup with }
/-- `Filter α` has distributive negation if `α` has. -/
protected def instDistribNeg [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α] : HasDistribNeg (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInvolutiveNeg with
neg_mul := fun _ _ => map₂_map_left_comm neg_mul
mul_neg := fun _ _ => map_map₂_right_comm mul_neg }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.commMonoid Filter.addCommMonoid Filter.divisionMonoid
Filter.subtractionMonoid Filter.divisionCommMonoid Filter.subtractionCommMonoid
Filter.instDistribNeg
section Distrib
variable [Distrib α] {f g h : Filter α}
/-!
Note that `Filter α` is not a `Distrib` because `f * g + f * h` has cross terms that `f * (g + h)`
lacks.
-/
theorem mul_add_subset : f * (g + h) ≤ f * g + f * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_left mul_add
theorem add_mul_subset : (f + g) * h ≤ f * h + g * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_right add_mul
end Distrib
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {f g : Filter α}
/-! Note that `Filter` is not a `MulZeroClass` because `0 * ⊥ ≠ 0`. -/
theorem NeBot.mul_zero_nonneg (hf : f.NeBot) : 0 ≤ f * 0 :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := hf.nonempty_of_mem h₁
⟨_, ha, _, h₂, mul_zero _⟩
theorem NeBot.zero_mul_nonneg (hg : g.NeBot) : 0 ≤ 0 * g :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, hb⟩ := hg.nonempty_of_mem h₂
⟨_, h₁, _, hb, zero_mul _⟩
end MulZeroClass
section Group
variable [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(m : F) {f g f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β}
/-! Note that `Filter α` is not a group because `f / f ≠ 1` in general -/
-- Porting note: increase priority to appease `simpNF` so left-hand side doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
protected theorem one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ f / g ↔ ¬Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := hfg.le_bot (mem_bot : ∅ ∈ ⊥)
exact Set.one_mem_div_iff.1 (h <| div_mem_div hs ht) (disjoint_iff.2 hst.symm)
· rintro h s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
exact hs (Set.one_mem_div_iff.2 fun ht => h <| disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem ht h₁ h₂)
| @[to_additive]
theorem not_one_le_div_iff : ¬1 ≤ f / g ↔ Disjoint f g :=
Filter.one_le_div_iff.not_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.one_le_div (h : f.NeBot) : 1 ≤ f / f := by
rintro s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Pointwise.lean | 699 | 705 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
/-!
# Bernstein polynomials
The definition of the Bernstein polynomials
```
bernsteinPolynomial (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)
```
and the fact that for `ν : Fin (n+1)` these are linearly independent over `ℚ`.
We prove the basic identities
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = 1`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ ν • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = n • X`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ (ν * (ν-1)) • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = (n * (n-1)) • X^2`
## Notes
See also `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Bernstein`, which defines the Bernstein approximations
of a continuous function `f : C([0,1], ℝ)`, and shows that these converge uniformly to `f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat (choose)
open Polynomial (X)
open scoped Polynomial
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `bernsteinPolynomial R n ν` is `(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)`.
Although the coefficients are integers, it is convenient to work over an arbitrary commutative ring.
-/
def bernsteinPolynomial (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν)
example : bernsteinPolynomial ℤ 3 2 = 3 * X ^ 2 - 3 * X ^ 3 := by
norm_num [bernsteinPolynomial, choose]
ring
namespace bernsteinPolynomial
theorem eq_zero_of_lt {n ν : ℕ} (h : n < ν) : bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map (f : R →+* S) (n ν : ℕ) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).map f = bernsteinPolynomial S n ν := by simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
end
theorem flip (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).comp (1 - X) = bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν) := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, h, tsub_tsub_assoc, mul_right_comm]
theorem flip' (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = (bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν)).comp (1 - X) := by
simp [← flip _ _ _ h, Polynomial.comp_assoc]
theorem eval_at_0 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 0 = if ν = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp [zero_pow h]
theorem eval_at_1 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 1 = if ν = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· obtain hνn | hnν := Ne.lt_or_lt h
· simp [zero_pow <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hνn]
· simp [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnν]
theorem derivative_succ_aux (n ν : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R (n + 1) (ν + 1)) =
(n + 1) * (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν - bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1)) := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
suffices ((n + 1).choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * ((↑(ν + 1 : ℕ) : R[X]) * X ^ ν) * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν) -
((n + 1).choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ (ν + 1) * ((↑(n - ν) : R[X]) * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν - 1)) =
(↑(n + 1) : R[X]) * ((n.choose ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν) -
(n.choose (ν + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ (ν + 1) * (1 - X) ^ (n - (ν + 1))) by
simpa [Polynomial.derivative_pow, ← sub_eq_add_neg, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Polynomial.derivative_mul, Polynomial.derivative_natCast, zero_mul,
Nat.cast_add, algebraMap.coe_one, Polynomial.derivative_X, mul_one, zero_add,
Polynomial.derivative_sub, Polynomial.derivative_one, zero_sub, mul_neg, Nat.sub_zero,
bernsteinPolynomial, map_add, map_natCast, Nat.cast_one]
conv_rhs => rw [mul_sub]
-- We'll prove the two terms match up separately.
refine congr (congr_arg Sub.sub ?_) ?_
· simp only [← mul_assoc]
apply congr (congr_arg (· * ·) (congr (congr_arg (· * ·) _) rfl)) rfl
-- Now it's just about binomial coefficients
exact mod_cast congr_arg (fun m : ℕ => (m : R[X])) (Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq n ν).symm
· rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; congr 1
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; congr 1
norm_cast
congr 1
convert (Nat.choose_mul_succ_eq n (ν + 1)).symm using 1
· -- Porting note: was
-- convert mul_comm _ _ using 2
-- simp
rw [mul_comm, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
· apply mul_comm
theorem derivative_succ (n ν : ℕ) : Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1)) =
n * (bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) ν - bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) (ν + 1)) := by
cases n
· simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
· rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply derivative_succ_aux
theorem derivative_zero (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernsteinPolynomial R n 0) = -n * bernsteinPolynomial R (n - 1) 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Polynomial.derivative_pow]
theorem iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt (n : ℕ) {ν k : ℕ} :
k < ν → (Polynomial.derivative^[k] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 = 0 := by
rcases ν with - | ν
· rintro ⟨⟩
· rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
induction' k with k ih generalizing n ν
· simp [eval_at_0]
· simp only [derivative_succ, Int.natCast_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, Function.comp_apply,
Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.iterate_derivative_sub,
Polynomial.iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, Polynomial.eval_mul, Polynomial.eval_natCast,
Polynomial.eval_sub]
intro h
apply mul_eq_zero_of_right
rw [ih _ _ (Nat.le_of_succ_le h), sub_zero]
convert ih _ _ (Nat.pred_le_pred h)
exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (k.succ_pos.trans_le h)).symm
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero (n ν : ℕ) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n (ν + 1))).eval 0 = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt R n (lt_add_one ν)
open Polynomial
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_at_0 (n ν : ℕ) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 =
(ascPochhammer R ν).eval ((n - (ν - 1) : ℕ) : R) := by
by_cases h : ν ≤ n
· induction' ν with ν ih generalizing n
· simp [eval_at_0]
· have h' : ν ≤ n - 1 := le_tsub_of_add_le_right h
simp only [derivative_succ, ih (n - 1) h', iterate_derivative_succ_at_0_eq_zero,
Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, sub_zero, iterate_derivative_sub,
iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, eval_one, eval_mul, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_comp,
eval_natCast, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ, ascPochhammer_succ_left]
obtain rfl | h'' := ν.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
· have : n - 1 - (ν - 1) = n - ν := by omega
rw [this, ascPochhammer_eval_succ]
rw_mod_cast [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h'.trans n.pred_le)]
· simp only [not_le] at h
rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h), eq_zero_of_lt R h]
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero.mp (pos_of_gt h)]
theorem iterate_derivative_at_0_ne_zero [CharZero R] (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Int.natCast_eq_zero, bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_at_0, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero]
simp only [← ascPochhammer_eval_cast]
norm_cast
apply ne_of_gt
obtain rfl | h' := Nat.eq_zero_or_pos ν
· simp
· rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h'] at h
exact ascPochhammer_pos _ _ (tsub_pos_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_le h))
/-!
Rather than redoing the work of evaluating the derivatives at 1,
we use the symmetry of the Bernstein polynomials.
-/
theorem iterate_derivative_at_1_eq_zero_of_lt (n : ℕ) {ν k : ℕ} :
k < n - ν → (Polynomial.derivative^[k] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 1 = 0 := by
intro w
rw [flip' _ _ _ (tsub_pos_iff_lt.mp (pos_of_gt w)).le]
simp [Polynomial.eval_comp, iterate_derivative_at_0_eq_zero_of_lt R n w]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_at_1 (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[n - ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 1 =
(-1) ^ (n - ν) * (ascPochhammer R (n - ν)).eval (ν + 1 : R) := by
rw [flip' _ _ _ h]
simp [Polynomial.eval_comp, h]
obtain rfl | h' := h.eq_or_lt
· simp
· norm_cast
congr
omega
theorem iterate_derivative_at_1_ne_zero [CharZero R] (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(Polynomial.derivative^[n - ν] (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν)).eval 1 ≠ 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial.iterate_derivative_at_1 _ _ _ h, Ne, neg_one_pow_mul_eq_zero_iff, ←
Nat.cast_succ, ← ascPochhammer_eval_cast, ← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_inj]
exact (ascPochhammer_pos _ _ (Nat.succ_pos ν)).ne'
open Submodule
|
theorem linearIndependent_aux (n k : ℕ) (h : k ≤ n + 1) :
LinearIndependent ℚ fun ν : Fin k => bernsteinPolynomial ℚ n ν := by
induction' k with k ih
· apply linearIndependent_empty_type
· apply linearIndependent_fin_succ'.mpr
fconstructor
· exact ih (le_of_lt h)
· -- The actual work!
-- We show that the (n-k)-th derivative at 1 doesn't vanish,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Bernstein.lean | 222 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
/-!
# Lie subalgebras
This file defines Lie subalgebras of a Lie algebra and provides basic related definitions and
results.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubalgebra`
* `LieSubalgebra.incl`
* `LieSubalgebra.map`
* `LieHom.range`
* `LieEquiv.ofInjective`
* `LieEquiv.ofEq`
* `LieEquiv.ofSubalgebras`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie subalgebra
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubalgebra
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
/-- A Lie subalgebra of a Lie algebra is submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie algebra. -/
structure LieSubalgebra extends Submodule R L where
/-- A Lie subalgebra is closed under Lie bracket. -/
lie_mem' : ∀ {x y}, x ∈ carrier → y ∈ carrier → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ carrier
/-- The zero algebra is a subalgebra of any Lie algebra. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨⟨0, @fun x y hx _hy ↦ by
rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 hx, zero_lie]
exact Submodule.zero_mem 0⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Coe (LieSubalgebra R L) (Submodule R L) :=
⟨LieSubalgebra.toSubmodule⟩
namespace LieSubalgebra
instance : SetLike (LieSubalgebra R L) L where
coe L' := L'.carrier
coe_injective' L' L'' h := by
rcases L' with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
rcases L'' with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubalgebra R L) L where
add_mem := Submodule.add_mem _
zero_mem L' := L'.zero_mem'
neg_mem {L'} x hx := show -x ∈ (L' : Submodule R L) from neg_mem hx
/-- A Lie subalgebra forms a new Lie ring. -/
instance lieRing (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) : LieRing L' where
bracket x y := ⟨⁅x.val, y.val⁆, L'.lie_mem' x.property y.property⟩
lie_add := by
intros
apply SetCoe.ext
apply lie_add
add_lie := by
intros
apply SetCoe.ext
apply add_lie
lie_self := by
intros
apply SetCoe.ext
apply lie_self
leibniz_lie := by
intros
apply SetCoe.ext
apply leibniz_lie
section
variable {R₁ : Type*} [Semiring R₁]
/-- A Lie subalgebra inherits module structures from `L`. -/
instance [SMul R₁ R] [Module R₁ L] [IsScalarTower R₁ R L] (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) : Module R₁ L' :=
L'.toSubmodule.module'
instance [SMul R₁ R] [SMul R₁ᵐᵒᵖ R] [Module R₁ L] [Module R₁ᵐᵒᵖ L] [IsScalarTower R₁ R L]
[IsScalarTower R₁ᵐᵒᵖ R L] [IsCentralScalar R₁ L] (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) :
IsCentralScalar R₁ L' :=
L'.toSubmodule.isCentralScalar
instance [SMul R₁ R] [Module R₁ L] [IsScalarTower R₁ R L] (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R L' :=
L'.toSubmodule.isScalarTower
instance (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) [IsNoetherian R L] : IsNoetherian R L' :=
isNoetherian_submodule' _
instance (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) [IsArtinian R L] : IsArtinian R L' :=
isArtinian_submodule' _
end
/-- A Lie subalgebra forms a new Lie algebra. -/
instance lieAlgebra (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) : LieAlgebra R L' where
lie_smul := by
{ intros
apply SetCoe.ext
apply lie_smul }
variable {R L}
variable (L' : LieSubalgebra R L)
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : L) ∈ L' :=
zero_mem L'
protected theorem add_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ L' → y ∈ L' → (x + y : L) ∈ L' :=
add_mem
protected theorem sub_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ L' → y ∈ L' → (x - y : L) ∈ L' :=
sub_mem
theorem smul_mem (t : R) {x : L} (h : x ∈ L') : t • x ∈ L' :=
(L' : Submodule R L).smul_mem t h
theorem lie_mem {x y : L} (hx : x ∈ L') (hy : y ∈ L') : (⁅x, y⁆ : L) ∈ L' :=
L'.lie_mem' hx hy
theorem mem_carrier {x : L} : x ∈ L'.carrier ↔ x ∈ (L' : Set L) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set L) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : L} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubalgebra R L) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : L} : x ∈ (L' : Submodule R L) ↔ x ∈ L' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coe_submodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : L} : x ∈ (L' : Set L) ↔ x ∈ L' :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x y : L') : (↑⁅x, y⁆ : L) = ⁅(↑x : L), ↑y⁆ :=
rfl
theorem ext_iff (x y : L') : x = y ↔ (x : L) = y :=
Subtype.ext_iff
theorem coe_zero_iff_zero (x : L') : (x : L) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
(ext_iff L' x 0).symm
@[ext]
theorem ext (L₁' L₂' : LieSubalgebra R L) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ L₁' ↔ x ∈ L₂') : L₁' = L₂' :=
SetLike.ext h
theorem ext_iff' (L₁' L₂' : LieSubalgebra R L) : L₁' = L₂' ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ L₁' ↔ x ∈ L₂' :=
SetLike.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (S : Set L) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Set L) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R L) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem' := h } : LieSubalgebra R L) : Submodule R L) = p := by
cases p
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_to_submodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubalgebra R L → Set L) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_set_eq (L₁' L₂' : LieSubalgebra R L) : (L₁' : Set L) = L₂' ↔ L₁' = L₂' :=
SetLike.coe_set_eq
theorem toSubmodule_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubalgebra R L → Submodule R L) :=
fun L₁' L₂' h ↦ by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff] at h
rw [← coe_set_eq]
exact h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias to_submodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj (L₁' L₂' : LieSubalgebra R L) :
(L₁' : Submodule R L) = (L₂' : Submodule R L) ↔ L₁' = L₂' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_to_submodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((L' : Submodule R L) : Set L) = L' :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_to_submodule := coe_toSubmodule
section LieModule
variable {M : Type w} [AddCommGroup M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable {N : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup N] [LieRingModule L N] [Module R N]
instance : Bracket L' M where
bracket x m := ⁅(x : L), m⁆
@[simp]
theorem coe_bracket_of_module (x : L') (m : M) : ⁅x, m⁆ = ⁅(x : L), m⁆ :=
rfl
instance : IsLieTower L' L M where
leibniz_lie x y m := leibniz_lie x.val y m
/-- Given a Lie algebra `L` containing a Lie subalgebra `L' ⊆ L`, together with a Lie ring module
`M` of `L`, we may regard `M` as a Lie ring module of `L'` by restriction. -/
instance lieRingModule : LieRingModule L' M where
add_lie x y m := add_lie (x : L) y m
lie_add x y m := lie_add (x : L) y m
leibniz_lie x y m := leibniz_lie x (y : L) m
variable [Module R M]
/-- Given a Lie algebra `L` containing a Lie subalgebra `L' ⊆ L`, together with a Lie module `M` of
`L`, we may regard `M` as a Lie module of `L'` by restriction. -/
instance lieModule [LieModule R L M] : LieModule R L' M where
smul_lie t x m := by
rw [coe_bracket_of_module, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower, smul_lie, coe_bracket_of_module]
lie_smul t x m := by simp only [coe_bracket_of_module, lie_smul]
/-- An `L`-equivariant map of Lie modules `M → N` is `L'`-equivariant for any Lie subalgebra
`L' ⊆ L`. -/
def _root_.LieModuleHom.restrictLie (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) : M →ₗ⁅R,L'⁆ N :=
{ (f : M →ₗ[R] N) with map_lie' := @fun x m ↦ f.map_lie (↑x) m }
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LieModuleHom.coe_restrictLie (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) : ⇑(f.restrictLie L') = f :=
rfl
end LieModule
/-- The embedding of a Lie subalgebra into the ambient space as a morphism of Lie algebras. -/
def incl : L' →ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
{ (L' : Submodule R L).subtype with
map_lie' := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_incl : ⇑L'.incl = ((↑) : L' → L) :=
rfl
/-- The embedding of a Lie subalgebra into the ambient space as a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl' : L' →ₗ⁅R,L'⁆ L :=
{ (L' : Submodule R L).subtype with
map_lie' := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_incl' : ⇑L'.incl' = ((↑) : L' → L) :=
rfl
end LieSubalgebra
variable {R L}
variable {L₂ : Type w} [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₂]
variable (f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂)
namespace LieHom
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie algebras is a Lie subalgebra. -/
def range : LieSubalgebra R L₂ :=
{ LinearMap.range (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂) with
lie_mem' := by
rintro - - ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, f.map_lie x y⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem range_coe : (f.range : Set L₂) = Set.range f :=
LinearMap.range_coe (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂)
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (x : L₂) : x ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ y : L, f y = x :=
LinearMap.mem_range
theorem mem_range_self (x : L) : f x ∈ f.range :=
LinearMap.mem_range_self (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂) x
/-- We can restrict a morphism to a (surjective) map to its range. -/
def rangeRestrict : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ f.range :=
{ (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂).rangeRestrict with
map_lie' := @fun x y ↦ by
apply Subtype.ext
exact f.map_lie x y }
@[simp]
theorem rangeRestrict_apply (x : L) : f.rangeRestrict x = ⟨f x, f.mem_range_self x⟩ :=
rfl
theorem surjective_rangeRestrict : Function.Surjective f.rangeRestrict := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_range] at hy; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hy
use x
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, rangeRestrict_apply]
/-- A Lie algebra is equivalent to its range under an injective Lie algebra morphism. -/
noncomputable def equivRangeOfInjective (h : Function.Injective f) : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ f.range :=
LieEquiv.ofBijective f.rangeRestrict
⟨fun x y hxy ↦ by
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, rangeRestrict_apply] at hxy
exact h hxy, f.surjective_rangeRestrict⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivRangeOfInjective_apply (h : Function.Injective f) (x : L) :
f.equivRangeOfInjective h x = ⟨f x, mem_range_self f x⟩ :=
rfl
end LieHom
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubalgebra_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R L) :
(∃ K : LieSubalgebra R L, ↑K = p) ↔ ∀ x y : L, x ∈ p → y ∈ p → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨K, rfl⟩ _ _
exact K.lie_mem'
· intro h
use { p with lie_mem' := h _ _ }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable (K K' : LieSubalgebra R L) (K₂ : LieSubalgebra R L₂)
@[simp]
theorem incl_range : K.incl.range = K := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj]
exact (K : Submodule R L).range_subtype
/-- The image of a Lie subalgebra under a Lie algebra morphism is a Lie subalgebra of the
codomain. -/
def map : LieSubalgebra R L₂ :=
{ (K : Submodule R L).map (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂) with
lie_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [AddSubsemigroup.mem_carrier] at hx hy
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩
rcases hy with ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
simpa using ⟨⁅x', y'⁆, K.lie_mem hx' hy', f.map_lie x' y'⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_map (x : L₂) : x ∈ K.map f ↔ ∃ y : L, y ∈ K ∧ f y = x :=
Submodule.mem_map
-- TODO Rename and state for homs instead of equivs.
theorem mem_map_submodule (e : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (x : L₂) :
x ∈ K.map (e : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) ↔ x ∈ (K : Submodule R L).map (e : L →ₗ[R] L₂) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The preimage of a Lie subalgebra under a Lie algebra morphism is a Lie subalgebra of the
domain. -/
def comap : LieSubalgebra R L :=
{ (K₂ : Submodule R L₂).comap (f : L →ₗ[R] L₂) with
lie_mem' := @fun x y hx hy ↦ by
suffices ⁅f x, f y⁆ ∈ K₂ by simp [this]
exact K₂.lie_mem hx hy }
section LatticeStructure
open Set
instance : PartialOrder (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift ((↑) : LieSubalgebra R L → Set L) coe_injective with
le := fun N N' ↦ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ N → x ∈ N' }
theorem le_def : K ≤ K' ↔ (K : Set L) ⊆ K' :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule : (K : Submodule R L) ≤ K' ↔ K ≤ K' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule := toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Set L) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Submodule R L) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias bot_coe_submodule := bot_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : L) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
instance : Top (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R L) with lie_mem' := @fun x y _ _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, y⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Set L) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Submodule R L) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias top_coe_submodule := top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : L) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) :=
mem_univ x
theorem _root_.LieHom.range_eq_map : f.range = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
instance : Min (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨fun K K' ↦
{ (K ⊓ K' : Submodule R L) with
lie_mem' := fun hx hy ↦ mem_inter (K.lie_mem hx.1 hy.1) (K'.lie_mem hx.2 hy.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ sInf {(s : Submodule R L) | s ∈ S} with
lie_mem' := @fun x y hx hy ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp, and_imp] at hx hy ⊢
intro K hK
exact K.lie_mem (hx K hK) (hy K hK) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(K ⊓ K') : Set L) = (K : Set L) ∩ (K' : Set L) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubalgebra R L)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R L) = sInf {(s : Submodule R L) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_to_submodule := sInf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubalgebra R L)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set L) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set L) := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule, sInf_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext x
simp
theorem sInf_glb (S : Set (LieSubalgebra R L)) : IsGLB S (sInf S) := by
have h : ∀ K K' : LieSubalgebra R L, (K : Set L) ≤ K' ↔ K ≤ K' := by
intros
exact Iff.rfl
apply IsGLB.of_image @h
simp only [sInf_coe]
exact isGLB_biInf
/-- The set of Lie subalgebras of a Lie algebra form a complete lattice.
We provide explicit values for the fields `bot`, `top`, `inf` to get more convenient definitions
than we would otherwise obtain from `completeLatticeOfInf`. -/
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf _ sInf_glb with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun N _ h ↦ by
rw [mem_bot] at h
rw [h]
exact N.zero_mem'
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ ↦ trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁₂ h₁₃ _ hm ↦ ⟨h₁₂ hm, h₁₃ hm⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.right }
instance : Add (LieSubalgebra R L) where add := max
instance : Zero (LieSubalgebra R L) where zero := ⊥
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (LieSubalgebra R L) where
add_assoc := sup_assoc
zero_add := bot_sup_eq
add_zero := sup_bot_eq
add_comm := sup_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : IsOrderedAddMonoid (LieSubalgebra R L) where
add_le_add_left _ _ := sup_le_sup_left
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd (LieSubalgebra R L) where
exists_add_of_le {_a b} h := ⟨b, (sup_eq_right.2 h).symm⟩
le_self_add _ _ := le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup : K + K' = K ⊔ K' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule :
(↑(K ⊓ K') : Submodule R L) = (K : Submodule R L) ⊓ (K' : Submodule R L) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias inf_coe_to_submodule := inf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf (x : L) : x ∈ K ⊓ K' ↔ x ∈ K ∧ x ∈ K' := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule,
Submodule.mem_inf]
theorem eq_bot_iff : K = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x : L, x ∈ K → x = 0 := by
rw [_root_.eq_bot_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
instance subsingleton_of_bot : Subsingleton (LieSubalgebra R (⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L)) := by
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
ext ⟨x, hx⟩; change x ∈ ⊥ at hx; rw [LieSubalgebra.mem_bot] at hx; subst hx
simp only [mem_bot, mem_top, iff_true]
rfl
theorem subsingleton_bot : Subsingleton (⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L) :=
show Subsingleton ((⊥ : LieSubalgebra R L) : Set L) by simp
variable (R L)
instance wellFoundedGT_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R L] : WellFoundedGT (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (⟨toSubmodule, @fun _ _ h ↦ h⟩ : _ →r (· > ·))
variable {R L K K' f}
section NestedSubalgebras
variable (h : K ≤ K')
/-- Given two nested Lie subalgebras `K ⊆ K'`, the inclusion `K ↪ K'` is a morphism of Lie
algebras. -/
def inclusion : K →ₗ⁅R⁆ K' :=
{ Submodule.inclusion h with map_lie' := @fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion (x : K) : (inclusion h x : L) = x :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_apply (x : K) : inclusion h x = ⟨x.1, h x.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_injective : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [inclusion_apply, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
/-- Given two nested Lie subalgebras `K ⊆ K'`, we can view `K` as a Lie subalgebra of `K'`,
regarded as Lie algebra in its own right. -/
def ofLe : LieSubalgebra R K' :=
(inclusion h).range
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofLe (x : K') : x ∈ ofLe h ↔ (x : L) ∈ K := by
simp only [ofLe, inclusion_apply, LieHom.mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact y.property
· intro h
use ⟨(x : L), h⟩
theorem ofLe_eq_comap_incl : ofLe h = K.comap K'.incl := by
ext
rw [mem_ofLe]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofLe : (ofLe h : Submodule R K') = LinearMap.range (Submodule.inclusion h) :=
rfl
/-- Given nested Lie subalgebras `K ⊆ K'`, there is a natural equivalence from `K` to its image in
`K'`. -/
noncomputable def equivOfLe : K ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ ofLe h :=
(inclusion h).equivRangeOfInjective (inclusion_injective h)
@[simp]
theorem equivOfLe_apply (x : K) : equivOfLe h x = ⟨inclusion h x, (inclusion h).mem_range_self x⟩ :=
rfl
end NestedSubalgebras
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {K : LieSubalgebra R L} {K' : LieSubalgebra R L₂} :
map f K ≤ K' ↔ K ≤ comap f K' :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
end LatticeStructure
section LieSpan
|
variable (R L) (s : Set L)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Subalgebra.lean | 606 | 607 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Casts of rational numbers into linear ordered fields.
-/
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem castHom_rat : castHom ℚ = RingHom.id ℚ :=
RingHom.ext cast_id
section LinearOrderedField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
theorem cast_pos_of_pos (hq : 0 < q) : (0 : K) < q := by
rw [Rat.cast_def]
exact div_pos (Int.cast_pos.2 <| num_pos.2 hq) (Nat.cast_pos.2 q.pos)
@[mono]
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ → K) := fun p q => by
simpa only [sub_pos, cast_sub] using cast_pos_of_pos (K := K) (q := q - p)
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ → K) :=
cast_strictMono.monotone
/-- Coercion from `ℚ` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def castOrderEmbedding : ℚ ↪o K :=
OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono (↑) cast_strictMono
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (p : K) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q := castOrderEmbedding.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (p : K) < q ↔ p < q := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_le_ratCast⟩ := cast_le
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_lt_ratCast⟩ := cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : 0 ≤ (q : K) ↔ 0 ≤ q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (q : K) ≤ 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : K) < q ↔ 0 < q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (q : K) < 0 ↔ q < 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_le_cast {m : ℕ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ (m : ℚ) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_intCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℤ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_le_cast {m : ℤ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ (m : ℚ) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) < n ↔ m < (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_lt_cast {m : ℕ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) < n ↔ (m : ℚ) < n := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt_intCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℤ} : (m : K) < n ↔ m < (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_lt_cast {m : ℤ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) < n ↔ (m : ℚ) < n := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_min (p q : ℚ) : (↑(min p q) : K) = min (p : K) (q : K) := (@cast_mono K _).map_min
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_max (p q : ℚ) : (↑(max p q) : K) = max (p : K) (q : K) := (@cast_mono K _).map_max
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_abs (q : ℚ) : ((|q| : ℚ) : K) = |(q : K)| := by simp [abs_eq_max_neg]
open Set
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Icc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Icc (p : K) q = Icc p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Icc ..
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ico (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ico (p : K) q = Ico p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ico ..
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioc (p : K) q = Ioc p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioc p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioo (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioo (p : K) q = Ioo p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioo p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ici (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ici (q : K) = Ici q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ici q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Iic (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Iic (q : K) = Iic q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Iic q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioi (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioi (q : K) = Ioi q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioi q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Iio (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Iio (q : K) = Iio q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Iio q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_uIcc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' uIcc (p : K) q = uIcc p q :=
(castOrderEmbedding (K := K)).preimage_uIcc p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_uIoc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' uIoc (p : K) q = uIoc p q :=
(castOrderEmbedding (K := K)).preimage_uIoc p q
end LinearOrderedField
end Rat
namespace NNRat
variable {K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] {p q : ℚ≥0}
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → K) := fun p q h => by
rwa [NNRat.cast_def, NNRat.cast_def, div_lt_div_iff₀, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul,
Nat.cast_lt (α := K), ← NNRat.lt_def]
· simp
· simp
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → K) :=
cast_strictMono.monotone
| /-- Coercion from `ℚ` as an order embedding. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Order.lean | 158 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
-- TODO: remove Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced and move the last two lemmas to Lemmas
/-!
# Roots of unity
We define roots of unity in the context of an arbitrary commutative monoid,
as a subgroup of the group of units.
## Main definitions
* `rootsOfUnity n M`, for `n : ℕ` is the subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid `M`
consisting of elements `x` that satisfy `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main results
* `rootsOfUnity.isCyclic`: the roots of unity in an integral domain form a cyclic group.
## Implementation details
It is desirable that `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup,
and it will mainly be applied to rings (e.g. the ring of integers in a number field) and fields.
We therefore implement it as a subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid.
We have chosen to define `rootsOfUnity n` for `n : ℕ` and add a `[NeZero n]` typeclass
assumption when we need `n` to be non-zero (which is the case for most interesting statements).
Note that `rootsOfUnity 0 M` is the top subgroup of `Mˣ` (as the condition `ζ^0 = 1` is
satisfied for all units).
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
variable {M N G R S F : Type*}
variable [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] [DivisionCommMonoid G]
section rootsOfUnity
variable {k l : ℕ}
/-- `rootsOfUnity k M` is the subgroup of elements `m : Mˣ` that satisfy `m ^ k = 1`. -/
def rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : Subgroup Mˣ where
carrier := {ζ | ζ ^ k = 1}
one_mem' := one_pow _
mul_mem' _ _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, mul_pow, one_mul]
inv_mem' _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, inv_pow, inv_one]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ ζ ^ k = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity` using `ζ : Mˣ`. -/
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity' (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ (ζ : M) ^ k = 1 := by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity]; norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity_one (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 1 M = ⊥ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_one, Subgroup.mem_bot]
@[simp]
lemma rootsOfUnity_zero (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 0 M = ⊤ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_zero, Subgroup.mem_top]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_injective {n : ℕ} :
Function.Injective (fun x : rootsOfUnity n M ↦ x.val.val) :=
Units.ext.comp fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.eq
/-- Make an element of `rootsOfUnity` from a member of the base ring, and a proof that it has
a positive power equal to one. -/
@[simps! coe_val]
def rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq (ζ : M) {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) : rootsOfUnity n M :=
⟨Units.ofPowEqOne ζ n h <| NeZero.ne n, Units.pow_ofPowEqOne _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_mkOfPowEq {ζ : M} {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) :
((rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq _ h : Mˣ) : M) = ζ :=
rfl
theorem rootsOfUnity_le_of_dvd (h : k ∣ l) : rootsOfUnity k M ≤ rootsOfUnity l M := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h
intro ζ h
simp_all only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_mul, one_pow]
theorem map_rootsOfUnity (f : Mˣ →* Nˣ) (k : ℕ) : (rootsOfUnity k M).map f ≤ rootsOfUnity k N := by
rintro _ ⟨ζ, h, rfl⟩
simp_all only [← map_pow, mem_rootsOfUnity, SetLike.mem_coe, MonoidHom.map_one]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Basic.lean | 98 | 98 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.NoZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series - Inverses
This file defines multivariate formal power series and develops the basic
properties of these objects, when it comes about multiplicative inverses.
For `φ : MvPowerSeries σ R` and `u : Rˣ` is the constant coefficient of `φ`,
`MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit φ u` is a formal power series such,
and `MvPowerSeries.mul_invOfUnit` proves that `φ * invOfUnit φ u = 1`.
The construction of the power series `invOfUnit` is done by writing that
relation and solving and for its coefficients by induction.
Over a field, all power series `φ` have an “inverse” `MvPowerSeries.inv φ`,
which is `0` if and only if the constant coefficient of `φ` is zero
(by `MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_zero`),
and `MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_cancel` asserts the equality `φ * φ⁻¹ = 1` when
the constant coefficient of `φ` is nonzero.
Instances are defined:
* Formal power series over a local ring form a local ring.
* The morphism `MvPowerSeries.map σ f : MvPowerSeries σ A →* MvPowerSeries σ B`
induced by a local morphism `f : A →+* B` (`IsLocalHom f`)
of commutative rings is a *local* morphism.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-
The inverse of a multivariate formal power series is defined by
well-founded recursion on the coefficients of the inverse.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition that unifies
the totalised inverse formal power series `(_)⁻¹` and
the inverse formal power series that depends on
an inverse of the constant coefficient `invOfUnit`. -/
protected noncomputable def inv.aux (a : R) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R
| n =>
letI := Classical.decEq σ
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, if _ : x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * inv.aux a φ x.2 else 0
termination_by n => n
theorem coeff_inv_aux [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) =
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 :=
show inv.aux a φ n = _ by
cases Subsingleton.elim ‹DecidableEq σ› (Classical.decEq σ)
rw [inv.aux]
rfl
/-- A multivariate formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible. -/
def invOfUnit (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) : MvPowerSeries σ R :=
inv.aux (↑u⁻¹) φ
theorem coeff_invOfUnit [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) :
coeff R n (invOfUnit φ u) =
if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹
else
-↑u⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (invOfUnit φ u) else 0 := by
convert coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹) φ
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invOfUnit (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) :
constantCoeff σ R (invOfUnit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ := by
classical
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invOfUnit, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOfUnit (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff σ R φ = u) :
φ * invOfUnit φ u = 1 :=
ext fun n =>
letI := Classical.decEq (σ →₀ ℕ)
if H : n = 0 then by
rw [H]
simp [coeff_mul, support_single_ne_zero, h]
else by
classical
have : ((0 : σ →₀ ℕ), n) ∈ antidiagonal n := by rw [mem_antidiagonal, zero_add]
rw [coeff_one, if_neg H, coeff_mul, ← Finset.insert_erase this,
Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _), coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, h,
coeff_invOfUnit, if_neg H, neg_mul, mul_neg, Units.mul_inv_cancel_left, ←
Finset.insert_erase this, Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _),
Finset.insert_erase this, if_neg (not_lt_of_ge <| le_rfl), zero_add, add_comm, ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_zero, Finset.sum_congr rfl]
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_antidiagonal] at hij
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hij
subst n
rw [if_pos]
suffices 0 + j < i + j by simpa
apply add_lt_add_right
constructor
· intro s
exact Nat.zero_le _
· intro H
apply h₁
suffices i = 0 by simp [this]
ext1 s
exact Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (H s)
-- TODO : can one prove equivalence?
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_mul (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff σ R φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u * φ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_cancel_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors (r := φ.invOfUnit u), mul_assoc, one_mul,
mul_invOfUnit _ _ h, mul_one]
apply mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_constantCoeff
simp only [constantCoeff_invOfUnit, IsUnit.mem_nonZeroDivisors (Units.isUnit u⁻¹)]
theorem isUnit_iff_constantCoeff {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
IsUnit φ ↔ IsUnit (constantCoeff σ R φ) := by
constructor
· exact IsUnit.map _
· intro ⟨u, hu⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, φ.invOfUnit u, mul_invOfUnit φ u hu.symm, invOfUnit_mul φ u hu.symm⟩, rfl⟩
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/-- Multivariate formal power series over a local ring form a local ring. -/
instance [IsLocalRing R] : IsLocalRing (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
IsLocalRing.of_isUnit_or_isUnit_one_sub_self <| by
intro φ
obtain ⟨u, h⟩ | ⟨u, h⟩ := IsLocalRing.isUnit_or_isUnit_one_sub_self (constantCoeff σ R φ) <;>
[left; right] <;>
· refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (mul_invOfUnit _ u ?_)
simpa using h.symm
-- TODO(jmc): once adic topology lands, show that this is complete
end CommRing
section IsLocalRing
variable {S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S) [IsLocalHom f]
-- Thanks to the linter for informing us that this instance does
-- not actually need R and S to be local rings!
/-- The map between multivariate formal power series over the same indexing set
induced by a local ring hom `A → B` is local -/
@[instance]
theorem map.isLocalHom : IsLocalHom (map σ f) :=
⟨by
rintro φ ⟨ψ, h⟩
replace h := congr_arg (constantCoeff σ S) h
rw [constantCoeff_map] at h
have : IsUnit (constantCoeff σ S ↑ψ) := isUnit_constantCoeff _ ψ.isUnit
rw [h] at this
rcases isUnit_of_map_unit f _ this with ⟨c, hc⟩
exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one φ (invOfUnit φ c) (mul_invOfUnit φ c hc.symm)⟩
end IsLocalRing
section Field
open MvPowerSeries
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
/-- The inverse `1/f` of a multivariable power series `f` over a field -/
protected def inv (φ : MvPowerSeries σ k) : MvPowerSeries σ k :=
inv.aux (constantCoeff σ k φ)⁻¹ φ
instance : Inv (MvPowerSeries σ k) :=
⟨MvPowerSeries.inv⟩
theorem coeff_inv [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ k) :
coeff k n φ⁻¹ =
if n = 0 then (constantCoeff σ k φ)⁻¹
else
-(constantCoeff σ k φ)⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, if x.2 < n then coeff k x.1 φ * coeff k x.2 φ⁻¹ else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n _ φ
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_inv (φ : MvPowerSeries σ k) :
constantCoeff σ k φ⁻¹ = (constantCoeff σ k φ)⁻¹ := by
classical
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_inv, if_pos rfl]
theorem inv_eq_zero {φ : MvPowerSeries σ k} : φ⁻¹ = 0 ↔ constantCoeff σ k φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congr_arg (constantCoeff σ k) h, fun h =>
ext fun n => by
classical
rw [coeff_inv]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [h, map_zero, zero_mul, inv_zero, neg_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_inv : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ k)⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_eq_zero, constantCoeff_zero]
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq (φ : MvPowerSeries σ k) (h : constantCoeff σ k φ ≠ 0) :
invOfUnit φ (Units.mk0 _ h) = φ⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq' (φ : MvPowerSeries σ k) (u : Units k) (h : constantCoeff σ k φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u = φ⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOfUnit_eq φ (h.symm ▸ u.ne_zero)]
apply congrArg (invOfUnit φ)
| rw [Units.ext_iff]
exact h.symm
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Inverse.lean | 238 | 239 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
/-!
# `min` and `max` in linearly ordered groups.
-/
section
variable {α : Type*} [Group α] [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftMono α]
-- TODO: This duplicates `oneLePart_div_leOnePart`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem max_one_div_max_inv_one_eq_self (a : α) : max a 1 / max a⁻¹ 1 = a := by
rcases le_total a 1 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
alias max_zero_sub_eq_self := max_zero_sub_max_neg_zero_eq_self
@[to_additive]
lemma max_inv_one (a : α) : max a⁻¹ 1 = a⁻¹ * max a 1 := by
rw [eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq', max_one_div_max_inv_one_eq_self]
end
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive min_neg_neg]
theorem min_inv_inv' (a b : α) : min a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = (max a b)⁻¹ :=
Eq.symm <| (@Monotone.map_max α αᵒᵈ _ _ Inv.inv a b) fun _ _ =>
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive max_neg_neg]
theorem max_inv_inv' (a b : α) : max a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = (min a b)⁻¹ :=
Eq.symm <| (@Monotone.map_min α αᵒᵈ _ _ Inv.inv a b) fun _ _ =>
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive min_sub_sub_right]
theorem min_div_div_right' (a b c : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using min_mul_mul_right a b c⁻¹
@[to_additive max_sub_sub_right]
theorem max_div_div_right' (a b c : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using max_mul_mul_right a b c⁻¹
@[to_additive min_sub_sub_left]
theorem min_div_div_left' (a b c : α) : min (a / b) (a / c) = a / max b c := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, min_mul_mul_left, min_inv_inv']
@[to_additive max_sub_sub_left]
theorem max_div_div_left' (a b c : α) : max (a / b) (a / c) = a / min b c := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, max_mul_mul_left, max_inv_inv']
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
theorem max_sub_max_le_max (a b c d : α) : max a b - max c d ≤ max (a - c) (b - d) := by
simp only [sub_le_iff_le_add, max_le_iff]; constructor
· calc
a = a - c + c := (sub_add_cancel a c).symm
_ ≤ max (a - c) (b - d) + max c d := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)
· calc
b = b - d + d := (sub_add_cancel b d).symm
_ ≤ max (a - c) (b - d) + max c d := add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem abs_max_sub_max_le_max (a b c d : α) : |max a b - max c d| ≤ max |a - c| |b - d| := by
refine abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact (max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans (max_le_max (le_abs_self _) (le_abs_self _))
· rw [abs_sub_comm a c, abs_sub_comm b d]
exact (max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans (max_le_max (le_abs_self _) (le_abs_self _))
theorem abs_min_sub_min_le_max (a b c d : α) : |min a b - min c d| ≤ max |a - c| |b - d| := by
simpa only [max_neg_neg, neg_sub_neg, abs_sub_comm] using
abs_max_sub_max_le_max (-a) (-b) (-c) (-d)
theorem abs_max_sub_max_le_abs (a b c : α) : |max a c - max b c| ≤ |a - b| := by
simpa only [sub_self, abs_zero, max_eq_left (abs_nonneg (a - b))]
using abs_max_sub_max_le_max a c b c
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/MinMax.lean | 103 | 105 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODO
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop
-- The `CompleteLattice, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
-- TODO: this could be replaced with `local infixr:90 " ∘ " => Rel.comp`.
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β := { y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y }
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
theorem image_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.image r.image := fun _ _ h _ ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩ =>
⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
theorem image_mono : Monotone r.image :=
r.image_subset
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∪ t) = r.image s ∪ r.image t :=
le_antisymm
(fun _y ⟨x, xst, rxy⟩ =>
xst.elim (fun xs => Or.inl ⟨x, ⟨xs, rxy⟩⟩) fun xt => Or.inr ⟨x, ⟨xt, rxy⟩⟩)
(r.image_mono.le_map_sup s t)
@[simp]
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : image (@Eq α) s = s := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
theorem image_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set α) : image (r • s) t = image s (image r t) := by
ext z; simp only [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩; exact ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩
· rintro ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩; exact ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩
theorem image_univ : r.image Set.univ = r.codom := by
ext y
simp [mem_image, codom]
@[simp]
theorem image_empty : r.image ∅ = ∅ := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem image_bot (s : Set α) : (⊥ : Rel α β).image s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x h
simp [mem_image, Bot.bot] at h
@[simp]
theorem image_top {s : Set α} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).image s = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ ⟨h.some, by simp [h.some_mem, Top.top]⟩
/-- Preimage of a set under a relation `r`. Same as the image of `s` under `r.inv` -/
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
r.inv.image s
theorem mem_preimage (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ r.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_def (s : Set β) : preimage r s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, r x y } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_preimage _ _ _
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : r.preimage s ⊆ r.preimage t :=
image_mono _ h
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.preimage s ∩ r.preimage t :=
image_inter _ s t
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∪ t) = r.preimage s ∪ r.preimage t :=
image_union _ s t
theorem preimage_id (s : Set α) : preimage (@Eq α) s = s := by
simp only [preimage, inv_id, image_id]
theorem preimage_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set γ) :
preimage (r • s) t = preimage r (preimage s t) := by simp only [preimage, inv_comp, image_comp]
theorem preimage_univ : r.preimage Set.univ = r.dom := by rw [preimage, image_univ, codom_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : r.preimage ∅ = ∅ := by rw [preimage, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inv (s : Set α) : r.inv.preimage s = r.image s := by rw [preimage, inv_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_bot (s : Set β) : (⊥ : Rel α β).preimage s = ∅ := by
rw [preimage, inv_bot, image_bot]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_top {s : Set β} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).preimage s = Set.univ := by rwa [← inv_top, preimage, inv_inv, image_top]
theorem image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset {s : Set β} (h : r.codom ⊆ s) : r.preimage s = r.dom := by
rw [← preimage_univ]
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· exact image_subset _ (Set.subset_univ _)
· intro x hx
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_univ, true_and] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ryx⟩
have hy : y ∈ s := h ⟨x, ryx⟩
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, ryx⟩⟩
theorem preimage_eq_codom_of_domain_subset {s : Set α} (h : r.dom ⊆ s) : r.image s = r.codom := by
apply r.inv.image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset (by rwa [← codom_inv] at h)
theorem image_inter_dom_eq (s : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ r.dom) = r.image s := by
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· apply r.image_mono (by simp)
· intro x h
rw [mem_image] at *
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, ryx⟩
use y
suffices h : y ∈ r.dom by simp_all only [Set.mem_inter_iff, and_self]
| rw [dom, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 258 | 258 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
| theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 684 | 685 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Vector
/-!
Results about "big operations" over a `Fintype`, and consequent
results about cardinalities of certain types.
## Implementation note
This content had previously been in `Data.Fintype.Basic`, but was moved here to avoid
requiring `Algebra.BigOperators` (and hence many other imports) as a
dependency of `Fintype`.
However many of the results here really belong in `Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`
and should be moved at some point.
-/
assert_not_exists MulAction
open Mathlib
universe u v
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Fintype
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_bool [CommMonoid α] (f : Bool → α) : ∏ b, f b = f true * f false := by simp
theorem card_eq_sum_ones {α} [Fintype α] : Fintype.card α = ∑ _a : α, 1 :=
Finset.card_eq_sum_ones _
section
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_extend_by_one [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) :
∏ i, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_filter, filter_mem_eq_inter, univ_inter]
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [Fintype α] [CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one (f : α → M) (h : ∀ a, f a = 1) : ∏ a, f a = 1 :=
Finset.prod_eq_one fun a _ha => h a
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_congr (f g : α → M) (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∏ a, f a = ∏ a, g a :=
Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a _ha => h a
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {f : α → M} (a : α) (h : ∀ x ≠ a, f x = 1) : ∏ x, f x = f a :=
Finset.prod_eq_single a (fun x _ hx => h x hx) fun ha => (ha (Finset.mem_univ a)).elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {f : α → M} (a b : α) (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : ∀ x, x ≠ a ∧ x ≠ b → f x = 1) :
∏ x, f x = f a * f b := by
apply Finset.prod_eq_mul a b h₁ fun x _ hx => h₂ x hx <;>
exact fun hc => (hc (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
/-- If a product of a `Finset` of a subsingleton type has a given
value, so do the terms in that product. -/
@[to_additive "If a sum of a `Finset` of a subsingleton type has a given
value, so do the terms in that sum."]
theorem eq_of_subsingleton_of_prod_eq {ι : Type*} [Subsingleton ι] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → M}
{b : M} (h : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = b) : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = b :=
Finset.eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq (Finset.card_le_one_of_subsingleton s) h
end
end Fintype
open Finset
section
variable {M : Type*} [Fintype α] [CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Fintype.prod_option (f : Option α → M) : ∏ i, f i = f none * ∏ i, f (some i) :=
Finset.prod_insertNone f univ
@[to_additive]
theorem Fintype.prod_eq_mul_prod_subtype_ne [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ i, f i = f a * ∏ i : {i // i ≠ a}, f i.1 := by
simp_rw [← (Equiv.optionSubtypeNe a).prod_comp, prod_option, Equiv.optionSubtypeNe_none,
Equiv.optionSubtypeNe_some]
end
open Finset
section Pi
variable {ι κ : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq κ]
@[simp] lemma Finset.card_pi (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
#(s.pi t) = ∏ i ∈ s, #(t i) := Multiset.card_pi _ _
namespace Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
@[simp] lemma card_piFinset (s : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
#(piFinset s) = ∏ i, #(s i) := by simp [piFinset, card_map]
/-- This lemma is specifically designed to be used backwards, whence the specialisation to `Fin n`
as the indexing type doesn't matter in practice. The more general forward direction lemma here is
`Fintype.card_piFinset`. -/
lemma card_piFinset_const {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) :
#(piFinset fun _ : Fin n ↦ s) = #s ^ n := by simp
@[simp] lemma card_pi [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] : card (∀ i, α i) = ∏ i, card (α i) :=
card_piFinset _
/-- This lemma is specifically designed to be used backwards, whence the specialisation to `Fin n`
as the indexing type doesn't matter in practice. The more general forward direction lemma here is
`Fintype.card_pi`. -/
lemma card_pi_const (α : Type*) [Fintype α] (n : ℕ) : card (Fin n → α) = card α ^ n :=
card_piFinset_const _ _
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the repeated product.
This is a version of `Finset.prod_sigma` specialized to the case
of multiplication over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the repeated sum.
This is a version of `Finset.sum_sigma` specialized to the case of summation over `Finset.univ`."]
theorem prod_sigma {ι} {α : ι → Type*} {M : Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] [CommMonoid M]
(f : Sigma α → M) : ∏ x, f x = ∏ x, ∏ y, f ⟨x, y⟩ :=
Finset.prod_sigma ..
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the repeated product, curried version.
This version is useful to rewrite from right to left. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the repeated sum, curried version.
This version is useful to rewrite from right to left."]
theorem prod_sigma' {ι} {α : ι → Type*} {M : Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] [CommMonoid M]
(f : (i : ι) → α i → M) : ∏ x : Sigma α, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x, ∏ y, f x y :=
prod_sigma ..
@[simp] nonrec lemma card_sigma {ι} {α : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
card (Sigma α) = ∑ i, card (α i) := card_sigma _ _
/-- The number of dependent maps `f : Π j, s j` for which the `i` component is `a` is the product
over all `j ≠ i` of `#(s j)`.
Note that this is just a composition of easier lemmas, but there's some glue missing to make that
smooth enough not to need this lemma. -/
lemma card_filter_piFinset_eq_of_mem [∀ i, DecidableEq (α i)]
(s : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) (i : ι) {a : α i} (ha : a ∈ s i) :
#{f ∈ piFinset s | f i = a} = ∏ j ∈ univ.erase i, #(s j) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j, #(Function.update s i {a} j) := by
rw [← piFinset_update_singleton_eq_filter_piFinset_eq _ _ ha, Fintype.card_piFinset]
_ = ∏ j, Function.update (fun j ↦ #(s j)) i 1 j :=
Fintype.prod_congr _ _ fun j ↦ by obtain rfl | hji := eq_or_ne j i <;> simp [*]
_ = _ := by simp [prod_update_of_mem, erase_eq]
lemma card_filter_piFinset_const_eq_of_mem (s : Finset κ) (i : ι) {x : κ} (hx : x ∈ s) :
#{f ∈ piFinset fun _ ↦ s | f i = x} = #s ^ (card ι - 1) :=
(card_filter_piFinset_eq_of_mem _ _ hx).trans <| by
rw [prod_const #s, card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ _), card_univ]
lemma card_filter_piFinset_eq [∀ i, DecidableEq (α i)] (s : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
#{f ∈ piFinset s | f i = a} = if a ∈ s i then ∏ b ∈ univ.erase i, #(s b) else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [card_filter_piFinset_eq_of_mem _ _ h]
· rw [filter_piFinset_of_not_mem _ _ _ h, Finset.card_empty]
lemma card_filter_piFinset_const (s : Finset κ) (i : ι) (j : κ) :
#{f ∈ piFinset fun _ ↦ s | f i = j} = if j ∈ s then #s ^ (card ι - 1) else 0 :=
(card_filter_piFinset_eq _ _ _).trans <| by
rw [prod_const #s, card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ _), card_univ]
end Fintype
end Pi
-- TODO: this is a basic theorem about `Fintype.card`,
-- and ideally could be moved to `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card`.
theorem Fintype.card_fun [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [Fintype β] :
Fintype.card (α → β) = Fintype.card β ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_vector [Fintype α] (n : ℕ) :
Fintype.card (List.Vector α n) = Fintype.card α ^ n := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card]; simp
/-- It is equivalent to compute the product of a function over `Fin n` or `Finset.range n`. -/
@[to_additive "It is equivalent to sum a function over `fin n` or `finset.range n`."]
theorem Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range [CommMonoid α] (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
∏ i : Fin n, f i = ∏ i ∈ range n, f i :=
calc
∏ i : Fin n, f i = ∏ i : { x // x ∈ range n }, f i :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (Fin.equivSubtype.trans (Equiv.subtypeEquivRight (by simp))) _ _ (by simp)
_ = ∏ i ∈ range n, f i := by rw [← attach_eq_univ, prod_attach]
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.prod_fin_eq_prod_range [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (c : Fin n → β) :
| ∏ i, c i = ∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, if h : i < n then c ⟨i, h⟩ else 1 := by
rw [← Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range, Finset.prod_congr rfl]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ _
simp only [hi, dif_pos]
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.prod_toFinset_eq_subtype {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] (f : α → M) : ∏ a ∈ { x | p x }.toFinset, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/BigOperators.lean | 217 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.IsSheafFor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# The equalizer diagram sheaf condition for a presieve
In `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean` it is defined what it means for a presheaf to be a
sheaf *for* a particular presieve. In this file we provide equivalent conditions in terms of
equalizer diagrams.
* In `Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition`, the sheaf condition at a presieve is shown to be
equivalent to that of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM (and combined with
`isSheaf_pretopology`, this shows the notions of `IsSheaf` are exactly equivalent.)
* In `Equalizer.Sieve.equalizer_sheaf_condition`, the sheaf condition at a sieve is shown to be
equivalent to that of Equation (3) p. 122 in Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92].
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
-/
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Equalizer
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max v u) {X : C} (R : Presieve X)
(S : Sieve X)
noncomputable section
/--
The middle object of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of the Stacks entry.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the middle object of the fork diagram there."]
def FirstObj : Type max v u :=
∏ᶜ fun f : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)
variable {P R}
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma FirstObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : FirstObj P R) (h : ∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(hf : R f), (Pi.π _ ⟨Y, f, hf⟩ : FirstObj P R ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ ⟨Y, f, hf⟩ : FirstObj P R ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩⟩
exact h Y f hf
variable (P R)
/-- Show that `FirstObj` is isomorphic to `FamilyOfElements`. -/
@[simps]
def firstObjEqFamily : FirstObj P R ≅ R.FamilyOfElements P where
hom t _ _ hf := Pi.π (fun f : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)) ⟨_, _, hf⟩ t
inv := Pi.lift fun f x => x _ f.2.2
instance : Inhabited (FirstObj P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
(firstObjEqFamily P _).toEquiv.inhabited
-- Porting note: was not needed in mathlib
instance : Inhabited (FirstObj P ((⊥ : Sieve X) : Presieve X)) :=
(inferInstance : Inhabited (FirstObj P (⊥ : Presieve X)))
/--
The left morphism of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of the Stacks entry.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the left morphism of the fork diagram there."]
def forkMap : P.obj (op X) ⟶ FirstObj P R :=
Pi.lift fun f => P.map f.2.1.op
/-!
This section establishes the equivalence between the sheaf condition of Equation (3) [MM92] and
the definition of `IsSheafFor`.
-/
namespace Sieve
/-- The rightmost object of the fork diagram of Equation (3) [MM92], which contains the data used
to check a family is compatible.
-/
def SecondObj : Type max v u :=
∏ᶜ fun f : Σ (Y Z : _) (_ : Z ⟶ Y), { f' : Y ⟶ X // S f' } => P.obj (op f.2.1)
variable {P S}
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma SecondObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : SecondObj P S) (h : ∀ (Y Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(hf : S.arrows f), (Pi.π _ ⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩ : SecondObj P S ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ ⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩ : SecondObj P S ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩⟩
apply h
variable (P S)
/-- The map `p` of Equations (3,4) [MM92]. -/
def firstMap : FirstObj P (S : Presieve X) ⟶ SecondObj P S :=
Pi.lift fun fg =>
Pi.π _ (⟨_, _, S.downward_closed fg.2.2.2.2 fg.2.2.1⟩ : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // S f })
instance : Inhabited (SecondObj P (⊥ : Sieve X)) :=
⟨firstMap _ _ default⟩
/-- The map `a` of Equations (3,4) [MM92]. -/
def secondMap : FirstObj P (S : Presieve X) ⟶ SecondObj P S :=
Pi.lift fun fg => Pi.π _ ⟨_, fg.2.2.2⟩ ≫ P.map fg.2.2.1.op
theorem w : forkMap P (S : Presieve X) ≫ firstMap P S = forkMap P S ≫ secondMap P S := by
ext
simp [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap]
/--
The family of elements given by `x : FirstObj P S` is compatible iff `firstMap` and `secondMap`
map it to the same point.
-/
theorem compatible_iff (x : FirstObj P S.arrows) :
((firstObjEqFamily P S.arrows).hom x).Compatible ↔ firstMap P S x = secondMap P S x := by
rw [Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
constructor
· intro t
apply SecondObj.ext
intros Y Z g f hf
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t _ g hf
· intro t Y Z f g hf
rw [Types.limit_ext_iff'] at t
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t ⟨⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩⟩
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `S`, iff the fork given by `w` is an equalizer. -/
theorem equalizer_sheaf_condition :
Presieve.IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X) ↔ Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (w P S))) := by
rw [Types.type_equalizer_iff_unique,
← Equiv.forall_congr_right (firstObjEqFamily P (S : Presieve X)).toEquiv.symm]
simp_rw [← compatible_iff]
simp only [inv_hom_id_apply, Iso.toEquiv_symm_fun]
apply forall₂_congr
intro x _
| apply existsUnique_congr
intro t
rw [← Iso.toEquiv_symm_fun]
rw [Equiv.eq_symm_apply]
constructor
· intro q
funext Y f hf
simpa [firstObjEqFamily, forkMap] using q _ _
· intro q Y f hf
rw [← q]
simp [firstObjEqFamily, forkMap]
end Sieve
/-!
This section establishes the equivalence between the sheaf condition of
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM and the definition of `isSheafFor`.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/EqualizerSheafCondition.lean | 156 | 174 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
/-!
# Preservation of zero objects and zero morphisms
We define the class `PreservesZeroMorphisms` and show basic properties.
## Main results
We provide the following results:
* Left adjoints and right adjoints preserve zero morphisms;
* full functors preserve zero morphisms;
* if both categories involved have a zero object, then a functor preserves zero morphisms if and
only if it preserves the zero object;
* functors which preserve initial or terminal objects preserve zero morphisms.
-/
universe v u v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
{E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
section ZeroMorphisms
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] [HasZeroMorphisms E]
/-- A functor preserves zero morphisms if it sends zero morphisms to zero morphisms. -/
class PreservesZeroMorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
/-- For any pair objects `F (0: X ⟶ Y) = (0 : F X ⟶ F Y)` -/
map_zero : ∀ X Y : C, F.map (0 : X ⟶ Y) = 0 := by aesop
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] (X Y : C) :
F.map (0 : X ⟶ Y) = 0 :=
PreservesZeroMorphisms.map_zero _ _
lemma map_isZero (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] {X : C} (hX : IsZero X) :
IsZero (F.obj X) := by
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at hX ⊢
rw [← F.map_id, hX, F.map_zero]
|
theorem zero_of_map_zero (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [Faithful F] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(h : F.map f = 0) : f = 0 :=
F.map_injective <| h.trans <| Eq.symm <| F.map_zero _ _
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Zero.lean | 57 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation
/-!
# Positive & negative parts
Mathematical structures possessing an absolute value often also possess a unique decomposition of
elements into "positive" and "negative" parts which are in some sense "disjoint" (e.g. the Jordan
decomposition of a measure).
This file provides instances of `PosPart` and `NegPart`, the positive and negative parts of an
element in a lattice ordered group.
## Main statements
* `posPart_sub_negPart`: Every element `a` can be decomposed into `a⁺ - a⁻`, the difference of its
positive and negative parts.
* `posPart_inf_negPart_eq_zero`: The positive and negative parts are coprime.
## References
* [Birkhoff, Lattice-ordered Groups][birkhoff1942]
* [Bourbaki, Algebra II][bourbaki1981]
* [Fuchs, Partially Ordered Algebraic Systems][fuchs1963]
* [Zaanen, Lectures on "Riesz Spaces"][zaanen1966]
* [Banasiak, Banach Lattices in Applications][banasiak]
## Tags
positive part, negative part
-/
open Function
variable {α : Type*}
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α]
section Group
variable [Group α] {a b : α}
/-- The *positive part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a ⊔ 1`, denoted `a⁺ᵐ`. -/
@[to_additive
"The *positive part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a ⊔ 0`, denoted `a⁺`."]
instance instOneLePart : OneLePart α where
oneLePart a := a ⊔ 1
/-- The *negative part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a⁻¹ ⊔ 1`, denoted `a⁻ᵐ `.
-/
@[to_additive
"The *negative part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `(-a) ⊔ 0`, denoted `a⁻`."]
instance instLeOnePart : LeOnePart α where
leOnePart a := a⁻¹ ⊔ 1
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_def (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ⊔ 1 := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_def (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ = a ⊔ 1 := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_mono : Monotone (·⁺ᵐ : α → α) :=
fun _a _b hab ↦ sup_le_sup_right hab _
@[to_additive (attr := simp high)] lemma oneLePart_one : (1 : α)⁺ᵐ = 1 := sup_idem _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_one : (1 : α)⁻ᵐ = 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive posPart_nonneg] lemma one_le_oneLePart (a : α) : 1 ≤ a⁺ᵐ := le_sup_right
@[to_additive negPart_nonneg] lemma one_le_leOnePart (a : α) : 1 ≤ a⁻ᵐ := le_sup_right
-- TODO: `to_additive` guesses `nonposPart`
@[to_additive le_posPart] lemma le_oneLePart (a : α) : a ≤ a⁺ᵐ := le_sup_left
@[to_additive] lemma inv_le_leOnePart (a : α) : a⁻¹ ≤ a⁻ᵐ := le_sup_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_eq_self : a⁺ᵐ = a ↔ 1 ≤ a := sup_eq_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_eq_one : a⁺ᵐ = 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := sup_eq_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, oneLePart_of_one_le⟩ := oneLePart_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, oneLePart_of_le_one⟩ := oneLePart_eq_one
/-- See also `leOnePart_eq_inv`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_eq_neg`."]
lemma leOnePart_eq_inv' : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ↔ 1 ≤ a⁻¹ := sup_eq_left
/-- See also `leOnePart_eq_one`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_eq_zero`."]
lemma leOnePart_eq_one' : a⁻ᵐ = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := sup_eq_right
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_le_one : a⁺ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [oneLePart]
/-- See also `leOnePart_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_nonpos`."]
lemma leOnePart_le_one' : a⁻ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_le_one : a⁻ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) posPart_pos] lemma one_lt_oneLePart (ha : 1 < a) : 1 < a⁺ᵐ := by
rwa [oneLePart_eq_self.2 ha.le]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_inv (a : α) : a⁻¹⁺ᵐ = a⁻ᵐ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_inv (a : α) : a⁻¹⁻ᵐ = a⁺ᵐ := by
simp [oneLePart, leOnePart]
section MulLeftMono
variable [MulLeftMono α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_eq_inv : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma leOnePart_eq_one : a⁻ᵐ = 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [leOnePart_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, leOnePart_of_le_one⟩ := leOnePart_eq_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, leOnePart_of_one_le⟩ := leOnePart_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp) negPart_pos] lemma one_lt_ltOnePart (ha : a < 1) : 1 < a⁻ᵐ := by
rwa [leOnePart_eq_inv.2 ha.le, one_lt_inv']
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 Prop 9 a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_div_leOnePart (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ / a⁻ᵐ = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, leOnePart_def, mul_sup, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel,
sup_comm, oneLePart_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_div_oneLePart (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ / a⁺ᵐ = a⁻¹ := by
rw [← inv_div, oneLePart_div_leOnePart]
@[to_additive]
lemma oneLePart_leOnePart_injective : Injective fun a : α ↦ (a⁺ᵐ, a⁻ᵐ) := by
simp only [Injective, Prod.mk.injEq, and_imp]
rintro a b hpos hneg
rw [← oneLePart_div_leOnePart a, ← oneLePart_div_leOnePart b, hpos, hneg]
@[to_additive]
lemma oneLePart_leOnePart_inj : a⁺ᵐ = b⁺ᵐ ∧ a⁻ᵐ = b⁻ᵐ ↔ a = b :=
Prod.mk_inj.symm.trans oneLePart_leOnePart_injective.eq_iff
section MulRightMono
variable [MulRightMono α]
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_anti : Antitone (leOnePart : α → α) :=
fun _a _b hab ↦ sup_le_sup_right (inv_le_inv_iff.2 hab) _
@[to_additive]
lemma leOnePart_eq_inv_inf_one (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ = (a ⊓ 1)⁻¹ := by
rw [leOnePart_def, ← inv_inj, inv_sup, inv_inv, inv_inv, inv_one]
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 Prop 9 d)
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_mul_leOnePart (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ * a⁻ᵐ = |a|ₘ := by
rw [oneLePart_def, sup_mul, one_mul, leOnePart_def, mul_sup, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel, sup_assoc,
← sup_assoc a, sup_eq_right.2 le_sup_right]
exact sup_eq_left.2 <| one_le_mabs a
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_mul_oneLePart (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ * a⁺ᵐ = |a|ₘ := by
rw [oneLePart_def, mul_sup, mul_one, leOnePart_def, sup_mul, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel, sup_assoc,
← @sup_assoc _ _ a, sup_eq_right.2 le_sup_right]
exact sup_eq_left.2 <| one_le_mabs a
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 Prop 9 a)
-- a⁺ᵐ ⊓ a⁻ᵐ = 0 (`a⁺` and `a⁻` are co-prime, and, since they are positive, disjoint)
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_inf_leOnePart_eq_one (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ ⊓ a⁻ᵐ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_left_inj a⁻ᵐ⁻¹, inf_mul, one_mul, mul_inv_cancel, ← div_eq_mul_inv,
oneLePart_div_leOnePart, leOnePart_eq_inv_inf_one, inv_inv]
end MulRightMono
end MulLeftMono
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [MulLeftMono α]
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 (with a and b swapped)
@[to_additive] lemma sup_eq_mul_oneLePart_div (a b : α) : a ⊔ b = b * (a / b)⁺ᵐ := by
simp [oneLePart, mul_sup]
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 (with a and b swapped)
@[to_additive] lemma inf_eq_div_oneLePart_div (a b : α) : a ⊓ b = a / (a / b)⁺ᵐ := by
simp [oneLePart, div_sup, inf_comm]
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 Prop 9 c)
@[to_additive] lemma le_iff_oneLePart_leOnePart (a b : α) : a ≤ b ↔ a⁺ᵐ ≤ b⁺ᵐ ∧ b⁻ᵐ ≤ a⁻ᵐ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨oneLePart_mono h, leOnePart_anti h⟩, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← oneLePart_div_leOnePart a, ← oneLePart_div_leOnePart b]
exact div_le_div'' h.1 h.2
@[to_additive abs_add_eq_two_nsmul_posPart]
| lemma mabs_mul_eq_oneLePart_sq (a : α) : |a|ₘ * a = a⁺ᵐ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← mul_mul_div_cancel a⁺ᵐ, oneLePart_mul_leOnePart, oneLePart_div_leOnePart]
@[to_additive add_abs_eq_two_nsmul_posPart]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/PosPart.lean | 194 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
/-!
# The `arctan` function.
Inequalities, identities and `Real.tan` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)`
and the whole line.
The result of `arctan x + arctan y` is given by `arctan_add`, `arctan_add_eq_add_pi` or
`arctan_add_eq_sub_pi` depending on whether `x * y < 1` and `0 < x`. As an application of
`arctan_add` we give four Machin-like formulas (linear combinations of arctangents equal to
`π / 4 = arctan 1`), including John Machin's original one at
`four_mul_arctan_inv_5_sub_arctan_inv_239`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff₀]
· norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
/-- `Real.tan` as an `OrderIso` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)` and `ℝ`. -/
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
(OrderIso.setCongr _ _ image_tan_Ioo).trans OrderIso.Set.univ
/-- Inverse of the `tan` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 < arctan x` and
`arctan x < π / 2` -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
tanOrderIso.symm x
@[simp]
theorem tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
tanOrderIso.apply_symm_apply x
theorem arctan_mem_Ioo (x : ℝ) : arctan x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arctan : range arctan = Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
((EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _).trans Subtype.range_coe
theorem arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| tanOrderIso.symm_apply_apply ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem cos_arctan_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < cos (arctan x) :=
cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x
theorem cos_sq_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) ^ 2 = 1 / (1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x).ne', tan_arctan]
theorem sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [← tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
theorem cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
theorem arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).1
theorem arctan_eq_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arctan x = arcsin (x / √(1 + x ^ 2)) :=
Eq.symm <| arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arctan x) (mem_Icc_of_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x)
theorem arcsin_eq_arctan {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-(1 : ℝ)) 1) :
arcsin x = arctan (x / √(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw_mod_cast [arctan_eq_arcsin, div_pow, sq_sqrt, one_add_div, div_div, ← sqrt_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀, sub_add_cancel, sqrt_one, div_one] <;> simp at h <;> nlinarith [h.1, h.2]
@[simp]
theorem arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin]
@[mono]
theorem arctan_strictMono : StrictMono arctan := tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono
@[gcongr]
lemma arctan_lt_arctan {x y : ℝ} (hxy : x < y) : arctan x < arctan y := arctan_strictMono hxy
@[gcongr]
lemma arctan_le_arctan {x y : ℝ} (hxy : x ≤ y) : arctan x ≤ arctan y :=
arctan_strictMono.monotone hxy
theorem arctan_injective : arctan.Injective := arctan_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem arctan_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arctan x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
.trans (by rw [arctan_zero]) arctan_injective.eq_iff
theorem tendsto_arctan_atTop : Tendsto arctan atTop (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atTop.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_arctan_atBot : Tendsto arctan atBot (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atBot.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atBot
theorem arctan_eq_of_tan_eq {x y : ℝ} (h : tan x = y) (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arctan y = x :=
injOn_tan (arctan_mem_Ioo _) hx (by rw [tan_arctan, h])
@[simp]
theorem arctan_one : arctan 1 = π / 4 :=
arctan_eq_of_tan_eq tan_pi_div_four <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = -arctan x := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin, neg_div]
| theorem arctan_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arctan x = arccos (√(1 + x ^ 2))⁻¹ := by
rw [arctan_eq_arcsin, arccos_eq_arcsin]; swap; · exact inv_nonneg.2 (sqrt_nonneg _)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 178 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Doob's upcrossing estimate
Given a discrete real-valued submartingale $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$, denoting by $U_N(a, b)$ the
number of times $f_n$ crossed from below $a$ to above $b$ before time $N$, Doob's upcrossing
estimate (also known as Doob's inequality) states that
$$(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(f_N - a)^+].$$
Doob's upcrossing estimate is an important inequality and is central in proving the martingale
convergence theorems.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing above `b` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing below `a` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat a b f N`: is the predictable process which is 1 if `n` is
between a consecutive pair of lower and upper crossings and is 0 otherwise. Intuitively
one might think of the `upcrossingStrat` as the strategy of buying 1 share whenever the process
crosses below `a` for the first time after selling and selling 1 share whenever the process
crosses above `b` for the first time after buying.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore a b f N`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to
above `b` before time `N`.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossings a b f`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to above
`b`. This takes value in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime`: `upperCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime`: `lowerCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part`: Doob's
upcrossing estimate.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part`: the inequality
obtained by taking the supremum on both sides of Doob's upcrossing estimate.
### References
We mostly follow the proof from [Kallenberg, *Foundations of modern probability*][kallenberg2021]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-!
## Proof outline
In this section, we will denote by $U_N(a, b)$ the number of upcrossings of $(f_n)$ from below $a$
to above $b$ before time $N$.
To define $U_N(a, b)$, we will construct two stopping times corresponding to when $(f_n)$ crosses
below $a$ and above $b$. Namely, we define
$$
\sigma_n := \inf \{n \ge \tau_n \mid f_n \le a\} \wedge N;
$$
$$
\tau_{n + 1} := \inf \{n \ge \sigma_n \mid f_n \ge b\} \wedge N.
$$
These are `lowerCrossingTime` and `upperCrossingTime` in our formalization which are defined
using `MeasureTheory.hitting` allowing us to specify a starting and ending time.
Then, we may simply define $U_N(a, b) := \sup \{n \mid \tau_n < N\}$.
Fixing $a < b \in \mathbb{R}$, we will first prove the theorem in the special case that
$0 \le f_0$ and $a \le f_N$. In particular, we will show
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This is `MeasureTheory.integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral` in our formalization.
To prove this, we use the fact that given a non-negative, bounded, predictable process $(C_n)$
(i.e. $(C_{n + 1})$ is adapted), $(C \bullet f)_n := \sum_{k \le n} C_{k + 1}(f_{k + 1} - f_k)$ is
a submartingale if $(f_n)$ is.
Define $C_n := \sum_{k \le n} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)$. It is easy to see that
$(1 - C_n)$ is non-negative, bounded and predictable, and hence, given a submartingale $(f_n)$,
$(1 - C) \bullet f$ is also a submartingale. Thus, by the submartingale property,
$0 \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_0] \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_N]$ implying
$$
\mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N] \le \mathbb{E}[(1 \bullet f)_N] = \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0].
$$
Furthermore,
\begin{align}
(C \bullet f)_N & =
\sum_{n \le N} \sum_{k \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} \sum_{n \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\sigma_k + 1} - f_{\sigma_k} + f_{\sigma_k + 2} - f_{\sigma_k + 1}
+ \cdots + f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\tau_{k + 1} - 1})\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k})
\ge \sum_{k < U_N(a, b)} (b - a) = (b - a) U_N(a, b)
\end{align}
where the inequality follows since for all $k < U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k} \ge b - a$ while for all $k > U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} = f_{\sigma_k} = f_N$ and
$f_{\tau_{U_N(a, b) + 1}} - f_{\sigma_{U_N(a, b)}} = f_N - a \ge 0$. Hence, we have
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N]
\le \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N],
$$
as required.
To obtain the general case, we simply apply the above to $((f_n - a)^+)_n$.
-/
/-- `lowerCrossingTimeAux a f c N` is the first time `f` reached below `a` after time `c` before
time `N`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
/-- `upperCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
above `b` after `f` reached below `a` for the `n - 1`-th time. -/
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
/-- `lowerCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
below `a` after `f` reached above `b` for the `n`-th time. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime]
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ_eq (ω : Ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω := by
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ]
rfl
end
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem upperCrossingTime_le : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
cases n
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_le]
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ, hitting_le]
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero' : upperCrossingTime a b f ⊥ n ω = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 upperCrossingTime_le
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le ω]
theorem upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, le_hitting upperCrossingTime_le ω]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ]
exact le_hitting lowerCrossingTime_le ω
theorem lowerCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
theorem upperCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} {N : ℕ} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≠ N) :
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω ≤ a := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 lowerCrossingTime_le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
b ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 (hitting_le _)⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_lowerCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans ?_ (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime hn)
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans (stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime hn) ?_
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_succ (hab : a < b) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime hab hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (lowerCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (upperCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
upperCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le hn)
-- `upperCrossingTime_bound_eq` provides an explicit bound
theorem exists_upperCrossingTime_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
∃ n, upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
by_contra h; push_neg at h
have : StrictMono fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω :=
strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab (h _)
obtain ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, hk⟩ :
∃ (m : _) (_ : m ∈ Set.range fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω), N < m :=
⟨upperCrossingTime a b f N (N + 1) ω, ⟨N + 1, rfl⟩,
lt_of_lt_of_le N.lt_succ_self (StrictMono.id_le this (N + 1))⟩
exact not_le.2 hk upperCrossingTime_le
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove (hab : a < b) :
BddAbove {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N} := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab
refine ⟨k, fun n (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) => ?_⟩
by_contra hn'
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_stabilize (not_le.1 hn').le hk)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty (hN : 0 < N) :
{n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty :=
⟨0, hN⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_bound_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N N ω = N := by
by_cases hN' : N < Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)
· refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le ?_
have hmono : StrictMonoOn (fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω)
(Set.Iic (Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)).pred) := by
refine strictMonoOn_Iic_of_lt_succ fun m hm => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab ?_
rw [Nat.lt_pred_iff] at hm
convert Nat.find_min _ hm
convert StrictMonoOn.Iic_id_le hmono N (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hN')
· rw [not_lt] at hN'
exact upperCrossingTime_stabilize hN' (Nat.find_spec (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab))
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le (hab : a < b) (hn : N ≤ n) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le
(le_trans (upperCrossingTime_bound_eq f N ω hab).symm.le (upperCrossingTime_mono hn))
variable {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_crossing (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) ∧
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) := by
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨isStoppingTime_const _ 0, ?_⟩
simp [hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Iic]
· obtain ⟨_, ih₂⟩ := ih
have : IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) := by
intro n
simp_rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime ih₂ (fun _ => lowerCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Ici hf _
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
intro n
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime this (fun _ => upperCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Iic hf _
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.1
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.2
/-- `upcrossingStrat a b f N n` is 1 if `n` is between a consecutive pair of lower and upper
crossings and is 0 otherwise. `upcrossingStrat` is shifted by one index so that it is adapted
rather than predictable. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingStrat (a b : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N,
(Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator 1 n
theorem upcrossingStrat_nonneg : 0 ≤ upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω :=
Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => Set.indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
theorem upcrossingStrat_le_one : upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω ≤ 1 := by
rw [upcrossingStrat, ← Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply]
· exact Set.indicator_le_self' (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
intro i _ j _ hij
simp only [Set.Ico_disjoint_Ico]
obtain hij' | hij' := lt_or_gt_of_ne hij
· rw [min_eq_left (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_right (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at hij'
rw [min_eq_right (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_left (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
theorem Adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
Adapted ℱ (upcrossingStrat a b f N) := by
intro n
change StronglyMeasurable[ℱ n] fun ω =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, ({n | lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω ≤ n} ∩
{n | n < upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω}).indicator 1 n
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun i _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ((hf.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime n).inter ?_)
simp_rw [← not_le]
exact (hf.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime n).compl
theorem Submartingale.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ :=
hf.sum_mul_sub hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (fun _ _ => upcrossingStrat_le_one) fun _ _ =>
upcrossingStrat_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ := by
refine hf.sum_mul_sub (fun n => (adapted_const ℱ 1 n).sub (hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted n))
(?_ : ∀ n ω, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N n) ω ≤ 1) ?_
· exact fun n ω => sub_le_self _ upcrossingStrat_nonneg
· intro n ω
simp [upcrossingStrat_le_one]
theorem Submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] ≤ μ[f n] - μ[f 0] := by
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
have := (hf.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).setIntegral_le (zero_le n) MeasurableSet.univ
rw [setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_univ] at this
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp only [Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty, integral_zero', le_refl]
have h₂ : μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] =
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (f (k + 1) - f k)] -
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
simp only [sub_mul, one_mul, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_apply,
Pi.mul_apply]
refine integral_sub (Integrable.sub (integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)
(integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)) ?_
convert (hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable n using 1
ext; simp
rw [h₂, sub_nonneg] at h₁
refine le_trans h₁ ?_
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_sub, integral_sub' (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _), le_refl]
/-- The number of upcrossings (strictly) before time `N`. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingsBefore [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (ω : Ω) : ℕ :=
sSup {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_bot [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω} : upcrossingsBefore a b f ⊥ ω = ⊥ := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 ω = 0 := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero' : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 = 0 := by
ext ω; exact upcrossingsBefore_zero
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n ≤ upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
haveI : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
(upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN).csSup_mem
((OrderBot.bddBelow _).finite_of_bddAbove (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab))
lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono hn) this
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b)
(hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (not_lt.1 ?_)
convert not_mem_of_csSup_lt hn (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) using 1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_le (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤ N := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· subst hN
rw [upcrossingsBefore_zero]
· refine csSup_le ⟨0, zero_lt_iff.2 hN⟩ fun n (hn : _ < N) => ?_
by_contra hnN
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le hab (not_le.1 hnN).le)
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have h' : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime h
induction' n with k ih
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, bot_eq_zero', eq_self_iff_true,
lowerCrossingTime_zero, true_and, eq_comm]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
· specialize ih (lt_of_le_of_lt (lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h')
have : upperCrossingTime a b f M k.succ ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N k.succ ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h'
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h'
rw [eq_comm, ih.2]
exact hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, eq_comm, this, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl] at h
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M (n + 1) ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have := (crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt hNM
(lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ h)).2
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, eq_comm, this]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
| cases n
· simp
· exact (crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt hNM h).1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_mono (hab : a < b) : Monotone fun N ω => upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω := by
intro N M hNM ω
simp only [upcrossingsBefore]
by_cases hemp : {n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty
· refine csSup_le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) hemp fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt hNM hn]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hn hNM
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hemp
simp [hemp, csSup_empty, bot_eq_zero', zero_le']
theorem upcrossingsBefore_lt_of_exists_upcrossing (hab : a < b) {N₁ N₂ : ℕ} (hN₁ : N ≤ N₁)
(hN₁' : f N₁ ω < a) (hN₂ : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hN₂' : b < f N₂ ω) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < upcrossingsBefore a b f (N₂ + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self _) (le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) ?_)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl]
refine ⟨N₂, ⟨?_, Nat.lt_succ_self _⟩, hN₂'.le⟩
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
refine ⟨N₁, ⟨le_trans ?_ hN₁, hN₂⟩, hN₁'.le⟩
by_cases hN : 0 < N
· have : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
Nat.sSup_mem (upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN) (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab)
rw [upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt (hN₁.trans (hN₂.trans <| Nat.le_succ _))
this]
exact this.le
· rw [not_lt, Nat.le_zero] at hN
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 491 | 519 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Heather Macbeth, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.PosPart
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.NNRat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
import Qq
/-!
## `positivity` core extensions
This file sets up the basic `positivity` extensions tagged with the `@[positivity]` attribute.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
section ite
variable [Zero α] (p : Prop) [Decidable p] {a b : α}
private lemma ite_pos [LT α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < ite p a b := by
| by_cases p <;> simp [*]
| Mathlib/Tactic/Positivity/Basic.lean | 30 | 31 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.MulOppositeLemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
/-! # Pointwise instances on `Subgroup` and `AddSubgroup`s
This file provides the actions
* `Subgroup.pointwiseMulAction`
* `AddSubgroup.pointwiseMulAction`
which matches the action of `Set.mulActionSet`.
These actions are available in the `Pointwise` locale.
## Implementation notes
The pointwise section of this file is almost identical to
the file `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise`.
Where possible, try to keep them in sync.
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {α G A S : Type*}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem inv_coe_set [InvolutiveInv G] [SetLike S G] [InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : (H : Set G)⁻¹ = H :=
Set.ext fun _ => inv_mem_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_coe_set [Group G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] {s : S} {a : G} (ha : a ∈ s) :
a • (s : Set G) = s := by
ext; simp [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, mul_mem_cancel_left, ha]
@[norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma coe_set_eq_one [Group G] {s : Subgroup G} : (s : Set G) = 1 ↔ s = ⊥ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma op_smul_coe_set [Group G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] {s : S} {a : G} (ha : a ∈ s) :
MulOpposite.op a • (s : Set G) = s := by
ext; simp [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, mul_mem_cancel_right, ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma coe_div_coe [SetLike S G] [DivisionMonoid G] [SubgroupClass S G] (H : S) :
H / H = (H : Set G) := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
variable [Group G] [AddGroup A] {s : Set G}
namespace Set
open Subgroup
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_subgroupClosure (hs : s.Nonempty) : s * closure s = closure s := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← Set.iUnion_smul_set]
have h a (ha : a ∈ s) : a • (closure s : Set G) = closure s :=
smul_coe_set <| subset_closure ha
simp +contextual [h, hs]
open scoped RightActions in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma subgroupClosure_mul (hs : s.Nonempty) : closure s * s = closure s := by
rw [← Set.iUnion_op_smul_set]
have h a (ha : a ∈ s) : (closure s : Set G) <• a = closure s :=
op_smul_coe_set <| subset_closure ha
simp +contextual [h, hs]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_mul_subgroupClosure (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∀ n, s ^ n * closure s = closure s
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc, mul_subgroupClosure hs, pow_mul_subgroupClosure hs]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma subgroupClosure_mul_pow (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∀ n, closure s * s ^ n = closure s
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, subgroupClosure_mul hs, subgroupClosure_mul_pow hs]
end Set
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_subset_closure (S : Set G) : S⁻¹ ⊆ closure S := fun s hs => by
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← Subgroup.inv_mem_iff]
exact subset_closure (mem_inv.mp hs)
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_toSubmonoid (S : Set G) :
(closure S).toSubmonoid = Submonoid.closure (S ∪ S⁻¹) := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x hx => ?_) (Submonoid.closure_le.2 ?_)
· refine
closure_induction
(fun x hx => Submonoid.closure_mono subset_union_left (Submonoid.subset_closure hx))
(Submonoid.one_mem _) (fun x y _ _ hx hy => Submonoid.mul_mem _ hx hy) (fun x _ hx => ?_) hx
rwa [← Submonoid.mem_closure_inv, Set.union_inv, inv_inv, Set.union_comm]
· simp only [true_and, coe_toSubmonoid, union_subset_iff, subset_closure, inv_subset_closure]
/-- For subgroups generated by a single element, see the simpler `zpow_induction_left`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"For additive subgroups generated by a single element, see the simpler
`zsmul_induction_left`."]
theorem closure_induction_left {p : (x : G) → x ∈ closure s → Prop} (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(mul_left : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), ∀ (y) hy, p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem (subset_closure hx) hy))
(inv_mul_cancel : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), ∀ (y) hy, p y hy →
p (x⁻¹ * y) (mul_mem (inv_mem (subset_closure hx)) hy))
{x : G} (h : x ∈ closure s) : p x h := by
revert h
simp_rw [← mem_toSubmonoid, closure_toSubmonoid] at *
intro h
induction h using Submonoid.closure_induction_left with
| one => exact one
| | mul_left x hx y hy ih =>
cases hx with
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Pointwise.lean | 125 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
/-! # The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes
In this file, we study the homotopy cofiber `HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber`
of a morphism `φ : F ⟶ G` of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. In this case,
we redefine it as `CochainComplex.mappingCone φ`. The API involves definitions
- `mappingCone.inl φ : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1)`,
- `mappingCone.inr φ : G ⟶ mappingCone φ`,
- `mappingCone.fst φ : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1` and
- `mappingCone.snd φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup ι] [One ι]
{F G : CochainComplex C ι} (φ : F ⟶ G)
instance [∀ p, HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X (p + 1)) (G.X p)] :
HasHomotopyCofiber φ where
hasBinaryBiproduct := by
rintro i _ rfl
infer_instance
end
variable {F G : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G)
variable [HasHomotopyCofiber φ]
/-- The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable def mappingCone := homotopyCofiber φ
namespace mappingCone
open HomComplex
/-- The left inclusion in the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `-1`. -/
noncomputable def inl : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.inlX φ p q (by dsimp; omega))
/-- The right inclusion in the mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def inr : G ⟶ mappingCone φ := homotopyCofiber.inr φ
/-- The first projection from the mapping cone, as a cocyle of degree `1`. -/
noncomputable def fst : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.fstX φ p q hpq)) 2 (by omega) (by
ext p _ rfl
simp [δ_v 1 2 (by omega) _ p (p + 2) (by omega) (p + 1) (p + 1) (by omega) rfl,
homotopyCofiber.d_fstX φ p (p + 1) (p + 2) rfl, mappingCone,
show Int.negOnePow 2 = 1 by rfl])
/-- The second projection from the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `0`. -/
noncomputable def snd : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0 :=
Cochain.ofHoms (homotopyCofiber.sndX φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : q + 1 = p) :
(inl φ).v p q (by rw [← hpq, add_neg_cancel_right]) ≫
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v q p hpq = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inl, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_snd_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q hpq ≫ (snd φ).v q q (add_zero q) = 0 := by
simp [inl, snd]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = 0 := by
simp [inr, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_snd_v (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inr, snd]
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst :
(inl φ).comp (fst φ).1 (neg_add_cancel 1) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F) := by
ext p
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) p (p-1) p rfl (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd :
(inl φ).comp (snd φ) (add_zero (-1)) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero (-1)) p q q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add 1) p p q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G) := by aesop_cat
/-! In order to obtain identities of cochains involving `inl`, `inr`, `fst` and `snd`,
it is often convenient to use an `ext` lemma, and use simp lemmas like `inl_v_f_fst_v`,
but it is sometimes possible to get identities of cochains by using rewrites of
identities of cochains like `inl_fst`. Then, similarly as in category theory,
if we associate the compositions of cochains to the right as much as possible,
it is also interesting to have `reassoc` variants of lemmas, like `inl_fst_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d) (he : 1 + d = e) :
(inl φ).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) (by rw [← he, neg_add_cancel_left]) = γ := by
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) (by omega) (by omega), inl_fst,
Cochain.id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d)
(he : 0 + d = e) (hf : -1 + e = f) :
(inl φ).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = d := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, inl_snd, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d)
(he : 1 + d = e) (hf : 0 + e = f) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = f := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_fst, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d) (he : 0 + d = e) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) (by simp only [← he, zero_add]) = γ := by
obtain rfl : d = e := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_snd, Cochain.id_comp]
lemma ext_to (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i}
(h₁ : f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij)
(h₂ : f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i)) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_to_X φ i j hij h₁ (by simpa [snd] using h₂)
lemma ext_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} (f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) :
f = g ↔ f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij ∧
f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_to φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} {f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A}
(h₁ : (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g)
(h₂ : (inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} (f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) :
f = g ↔ (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g ∧
(inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_from φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma decomp_to {i : ℤ} {A : C} (f : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) (j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
∃ (a : A ⟶ F.X j) (b : A ⟶ G.X i), f = a ≫ (inl φ).v j i (by omega) + b ≫ (inr φ).f i :=
⟨f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij, f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i),
by apply ext_to φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma decomp_from {j : ℤ} {A : C} (f : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) (i : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) :
∃ (a : F.X i ⟶ A) (b : G.X j ⟶ A),
f = (fst φ).1.v j i hij ≫ a + (snd φ).v j j (add_zero j) ≫ b :=
⟨(inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f, (inr φ).f j ≫ f,
by apply ext_from φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma ext_cochain_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K (mappingCone φ) i} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔ γ₁.comp (fst φ).1 hij = γ₂.comp (fst φ).1 hij ∧
γ₁.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) = γ₂.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_to_iff φ q (q + 1) rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ p (q + 1) (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ _ p q (q + 1) hpq rfl] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma ext_cochain_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) K j} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔
(inl φ).comp γ₁ (show _ = i by omega) = (inl φ).comp γ₂ (by omega) ∧
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₁ (zero_add j) =
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₂ (zero_add j) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_from_iff φ (p + 1) p rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ (p + 1) q (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q (by omega)
simp only [Cochain.comp_v (inl φ) _ _ (p + 1) p q (by omega) hpq] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma id :
(fst φ).1.comp (inl φ) (add_neg_cancel 1) +
(snd φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 _) := by
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff φ (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1)]
lemma id_X (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ (inl φ).v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ (inr φ).f p = 𝟙 ((mappingCone φ).X p) := by
simpa only [Cochain.add_v, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, id_f,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p q p hpq (by omega)]
using Cochain.congr_v (id φ) p p (add_zero p)
@[reassoc]
lemma inl_v_d (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + (-1) = j) (hik : k + (-1) = i) :
(inl φ).v i j hij ≫ (mappingCone φ).d j i =
φ.f i ≫ (inr φ).f i - F.d i k ≫ (inl φ).v _ _ hik := by
dsimp [mappingCone, inl, inr]
rw [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d φ j i k (by dsimp; omega) (by dsimp; omega)]
abel
@[reassoc]
lemma inr_f_d (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f n₁ ≫ (mappingCone φ).d n₁ n₂ = G.d n₁ n₂ ≫ (inr φ).f n₂ := by
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma d_fst_v (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) (hjk : j + 1 = k) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (fst φ).1.v j k hjk =
-(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ F.d j k := by
apply homotopyCofiber.d_fstX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_fst_v' (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d (i - 1) i ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij =
-(fst φ).1.v (i - 1) i (by omega) ≫ F.d i j :=
d_fst_v φ (i - 1) i j (by omega) hij
@[reassoc]
lemma d_snd_v (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (snd φ).v j j (add_zero _) =
(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ φ.f j + (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) ≫ G.d i j := by
dsimp [mappingCone, snd, fst]
simp only [Cochain.ofHoms_v]
apply homotopyCofiber.d_sndX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_snd_v' (n : ℤ) :
(mappingCone φ).d (n - 1) n ≫ (snd φ).v n n (add_zero n) =
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v (n - 1) n (by omega) ≫ φ.f n +
(snd φ).v (n - 1) (n - 1) (add_zero _) ≫ G.d (n - 1) n := by
apply d_snd_v
@[simp]
lemma δ_inl :
δ (-1) 0 (inl φ) = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ inr φ) := by
ext p
simp [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) (inl φ) p p (add_zero p) _ _ rfl rfl,
inl_v_d φ p (p - 1) (p + 1) (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma δ_snd :
δ 0 1 (snd φ) = -(fst φ).1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) := by
ext p q hpq
simp [d_snd_v φ p q hpq]
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def descCochain (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n) :
Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n :=
(fst φ).1.comp α (by rw [← h, add_comm]) + (snd φ).comp β (zero_add n)
variable (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n)
@[simp]
lemma inl_descCochain :
(inl φ).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (by omega) = α := by
simp [descCochain]
@[simp]
lemma inr_descCochain :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (zero_add n) = β := by
simp [descCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + (-1) = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + n = p₃) :
(inl φ).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ =
α.v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂, ← h, add_comm m, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left]) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show -1 + n = m by omega) p₁ p₂ p₃
(by omega) (by omega)] using
Cochain.congr_v (inl_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(inr φ).f p₁ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add n) p₁ p₁ p₂ (add_zero p₁) h₁₂, Cochain.ofHom_v]
using Cochain.congr_v (inr_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_descCochain (n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + 1 = n') :
δ n n' (descCochain φ α β h) =
(fst φ).1.comp (δ m n α +
n'.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β (zero_add n)) (by omega) +
(snd φ).comp (δ n n' β) (zero_add n') := by
dsimp only [descCochain]
simp only [δ_add, Cochain.comp_add, δ_comp (fst φ).1 α _ 2 n n' hn' (by omega) (by omega),
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, smul_zero, add_zero,
δ_comp (snd φ) β (zero_add n) 1 n' n' hn' (zero_add 1) hn', δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
smul_neg, Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, Cochain.comp_units_smul, ← hn',
Int.negOnePow_succ, Units.neg_smul, Cochain.comp_neg]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cocycle F K n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def descCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cocycle G K n)
(h : m + 1 = n) (eq : δ m n α = n.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β.1 (zero_add n)) :
Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n :=
Cocycle.mk (descCochain φ α β.1 h) (n + 1) rfl
(by simp [δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ rfl, eq, Int.negOnePow_succ])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `mappingCone φ ⟶ K` that is constructed
from a cochain `α : Cochain F K (-1)` and a morphism `β : G ⟶ K` such that
`δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)`. -/
noncomputable def desc (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K)
(eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)) : mappingCone φ ⟶ K :=
Cocycle.homOf (descCocycle φ α (Cocycle.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) (by simp [eq]))
variable (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K) (eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β))
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_desc :
Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq) = descCochain φ α (Cochain.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_desc_f (p q : ℤ) (h : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q h ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f q = α.v p q h := by
simp [desc]
lemma inl_desc :
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq)) (add_zero _) = α := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_desc_f (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f p = β.f p := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_desc : inr φ ≫ desc φ α β eq = β := by aesop_cat
lemma desc_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(desc φ α β eq).f p = (fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ α.v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ β.f p := by
simp [ext_from_iff _ _ _ hpq]
end
/-- Constructor for homotopies between morphisms from a mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def descHomotopy {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (f₁ f₂ : mappingCone φ ⟶ K)
(γ₁ : Cochain F K (-2)) (γ₂ : Cochain G K (-1))
(h₁ : (inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₁) (add_zero (-1)) =
δ (-2) (-1) γ₁ + (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp γ₂ (zero_add (-1)) +
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₂) (add_zero (-1)))
(h₂ : Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₁) = δ (-1) 0 γ₂ + Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₂)) :
Homotopy f₁ f₂ :=
(Cochain.equivHomotopy f₁ f₂).symm ⟨descCochain φ γ₁ γ₂ (by norm_num), by
simp only [Cochain.ofHom_comp] at h₂
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1), h₁, h₂]⟩
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def liftCochain (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m) :
Cochain K (mappingCone φ) n :=
α.comp (inl φ) (by omega) + β.comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero n)
variable (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_fst :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (fst φ).1 h = α := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_snd :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (snd φ) (add_zero n) = β := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_fst_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + 1 = p₃) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (fst φ).1.v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ = α.v p₁ p₃ (by omega) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ h p₁ p₂ p₃ h₁₂ h₂₃]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_fst φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_snd_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (snd φ).v p₂ p₂ (add_zero p₂) = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero n) p₁ p₂ p₂ h₁₂ (add_zero p₂)]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_snd φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_liftCochain (m' : ℤ) (hm' : m + 1 = m') :
δ n m (liftCochain φ α β h) = -(δ m m' α).comp (inl φ) (by omega) +
(δ n m β + α.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m)).comp
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero m) := by
dsimp only [liftCochain]
simp only [δ_add, δ_comp α (inl φ) _ m' _ _ h hm' (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_comp_zero_cochain _ _ _ h, δ_inl, Cochain.ofHom_comp,
Int.negOnePow_neg, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.neg_smul, one_smul,
δ_ofHom, Cochain.comp_zero, zero_add, Cochain.add_comp,
Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain K F m` (with `n + 1 = m`) and `β : Cocycle K G n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def liftCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cocycle K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
(eq : δ n m β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m) = 0) :
Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n :=
Cocycle.mk (liftCochain φ α β h) m h (by
simp only [δ_liftCochain φ α β h (m+1) rfl, eq,
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, neg_zero, add_zero])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (α : Cocycle K F 1) (β : Cochain K G 0)
(eq : δ 0 1 β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) = 0)
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `K ⟶ mappingCone φ` that is constructed
from a cocycle `α : Cochain K F 1` and a cochain `β : Cochain K G 0`
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
noncomputable def lift :
K ⟶ mappingCone φ :=
Cocycle.homOf (liftCocycle φ α β (zero_add 1) eq)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_lift :
Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq) = liftCochain φ α β (zero_add 1) := by
simp only [lift, Cocycle.cochain_ofHom_homOf_eq_coe, liftCocycle_coe]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(lift φ α β eq).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = α.1.v p q hpq := by
simp [lift]
lemma lift_fst :
| (Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = α.1 := by simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/MappingCone.lean | 489 | 490 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, comp_neg]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : R) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul]
@[simp]
lemma comp_units_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : Rˣ) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.comp_smul
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_id {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) :
z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G)) (add_zero n) = z₁ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_zero_cochain_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_comp (φ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), G.X p ⟶ K.X p) :
| (ofHoms φ).comp (ofHoms ψ) (zero_add 0) = ofHoms (fun p => φ p ≫ ψ p) := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_comp (f : F ⟶ G) (g : G ⟶ K) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 383 | 386 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finsets in product types
This file defines finset constructions on the product type `α × β`. Beware not to confuse with the
`Finset.prod` operation which computes the multiplicative product.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.product`: Turns `s : Finset α`, `t : Finset β` into their product in `Finset (α × β)`.
* `Finset.diag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.diag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, a)` with
`a ∈ s`.
* `Finset.offDiag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.offDiag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, b)` with
`a, b ∈ s` and `a ≠ b`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Multiset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### prod -/
section Prod
variable {s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.product t.nodup⟩
instance instSProd : SProd (Finset α) (Finset β) (Finset (α × β)) where
sprod := Finset.product
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_sprod : Finset.product s t = s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_val : (s ×ˢ t).1 = s.1 ×ˢ t.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s ×ˢ t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Multiset.mem_product
theorem mk_mem_product (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s ×ˢ t :=
mem_product.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(↑(s ×ˢ t) : Set (α × β)) = (s : Set α) ×ˢ t :=
Set.ext fun _ => Finset.mem_product
theorem subset_product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst ⊆ s := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem subset_product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd ⊆ t := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst = s := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] (ht : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd = t := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem subset_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ s.image Prod.fst ×ˢ s.image Prod.snd := fun _ hp =>
mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ h =>
mem_product.2 ⟨hs (mem_product.1 h).1, ht (mem_product.1 h).2⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_left (hs : s ⊆ s') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t :=
product_subset_product hs (Subset.refl _)
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_right (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s ×ˢ t' :=
product_subset_product (Subset.refl _) ht
theorem prodMap_image_product {δ : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [DecidableEq δ]
(f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (Prod.map f g) = s.image f ×ˢ t.image g :=
mod_cast Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem prodMap_map_product {δ : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) (g : γ ↪ δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).map (f.prodMap g) = s.map f ×ˢ t.map g := by
simpa [← coe_inj] using Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem map_swap_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).map ⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap_injective⟩ = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_product [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).image Prod.swap = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
theorem product_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = s.biUnion fun a => t.image fun b => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
theorem product_eq_biUnion_right [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
/-- See also `Finset.sup_product_left`. -/
@[simp]
theorem product_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α × β → Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion f = s.biUnion fun a => t.biUnion fun b => f (a, b) := by
classical simp_rw [product_eq_biUnion, biUnion_biUnion, image_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem card_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : card (s ×ˢ t) = card s * card t :=
Multiset.card_product _ _
/-- The product of two Finsets is nontrivial iff both are nonempty
at least one of them is nontrivial. -/
lemma nontrivial_prod_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nontrivial ↔
s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ (s.Nontrivial ∨ t.Nontrivial) := by
simp_rw [← card_pos, ← one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial, card_product]; apply Nat.one_lt_mul_iff
theorem filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = s.filter p ×ˢ t.filter q := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [mem_filter, mem_product, decide_eq_true_eq, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
theorem filter_product_left (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1) = s.filter p ×ˢ t := by
simpa using filter_product p fun _ => true
theorem filter_product_right (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => q x.2) = s ×ˢ t.filter q := by
simpa using filter_product (fun _ : α => true) q
theorem filter_product_card (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => (p x.1) = (q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card +
(s.filter (¬ p ·)).card * (t.filter (¬ q ·)).card := by
classical
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_of_disjoint]
· apply congr_arg
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product]
constructor <;> intro h <;> use h.1
· simp only [h.2, Function.comp_apply, Decidable.em, and_self]
· revert h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, and_imp]
rintro _ _ (_|_) <;> simp [*]
· apply Finset.disjoint_filter_filter'
exact (disjoint_compl_right.inf_left _).inf_right _
@[simp]
theorem empty_product (t : Finset β) : (∅ : Finset α) ×ˢ t = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_empty (s : Finset α) : s ×ˢ (∅ : Finset β) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ h => not_mem_empty _ (Finset.mem_product.1 h).2
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.product (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht
⟨(x, y), mem_product.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.1, (mem_product.1 hxy).1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.2, (mem_product.1 hxy).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_product : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.product h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_empty {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_product, not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty,
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_product {a : α} :
({a} : Finset α) ×ˢ t = t.map ⟨Prod.mk a, Prod.mk_right_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
lemma product_singleton : s ×ˢ {b} = s.map ⟨fun i => (i, b), Prod.mk_left_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem singleton_product_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
({a} ×ˢ {b} : Finset _) = {(a, b)} := by
simp only [product_singleton, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem union_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∪ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∪ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [or_and_right, mem_union, mem_product]
@[simp]
theorem product_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∪ t') = s ×ˢ t ∪ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_or_left, mem_union, mem_product]
theorem inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∩ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∩ t') = s ×ˢ t ∩ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] :
s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t' = (s ∩ s') ×ˢ (t ∩ t') := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_assoc, and_left_comm, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem disjoint_product : Disjoint (s ×ˢ t) (s' ×ˢ t') ↔ Disjoint s s' ∨ Disjoint t t' := by
simp_rw [← disjoint_coe, coe_product, Set.disjoint_prod]
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_product (hs : Disjoint s s') :
s.disjUnion s' hs ×ˢ t = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s' ×ˢ t) (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inl hs) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.add_product _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem product_disjUnion (ht : Disjoint t t') :
s ×ˢ t.disjUnion t' ht = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s ×ˢ t') (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inr ht) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.product_add _ _ _
end Prod
section Diag
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α)
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the diagonal, `s.diag` is the set of pairs of the form `(a, a)` for
`a ∈ s`. -/
def diag :=
(s ×ˢ s).filter fun a : α × α => a.fst = a.snd
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the off-diagonal, `s.offDiag` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` with `a ≠ b`
for `a, b ∈ s`. -/
def offDiag :=
(s ×ˢ s).filter fun a : α × α => a.fst ≠ a.snd
variable {s} {x : α × α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_diag : x ∈ s.diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.1 = x.2 := by
simp +contextual [diag]
@[simp]
theorem mem_offDiag : x ∈ s.offDiag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ s ∧ x.1 ≠ x.2 := by
simp [offDiag, and_assoc]
variable (s)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_offDiag : (s.offDiag : Set (α × α)) = (s : Set α).offDiag :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_offDiag
@[simp]
theorem diag_card : (diag s).card = s.card := by
suffices diag s = s.image fun a => (a, a) by
rw [this]
apply card_image_of_injOn
exact fun x1 _ x2 _ h3 => (Prod.mk.inj h3).1
ext ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
rw [mem_diag]
constructor <;> intro h <;> rw [Finset.mem_image] at *
· use a₁
simpa using h
· rcases h with ⟨a, h1, h2⟩
have h := Prod.mk.inj h2
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
use h1
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_card : (offDiag s).card = s.card * s.card - s.card :=
suffices (diag s).card + (offDiag s).card = s.card * s.card by rw [s.diag_card] at this; omega
by rw [← card_product, diag, offDiag]
conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun a => a.1 = a.2)]
@[mono]
theorem diag_mono : Monotone (diag : Finset α → Finset (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ hx =>
mem_diag.2 <| And.imp_left (@h _) <| mem_diag.1 hx
@[mono]
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Finset α → Finset (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ hx =>
mem_offDiag.2 <| And.imp (@h _) (And.imp_left <| @h _) <| mem_offDiag.1 hx
@[simp]
theorem diag_empty : (∅ : Finset α).diag = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Finset α).offDiag = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diag_union_offDiag : s.diag ∪ s.offDiag = s ×ˢ s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← filter_union_filter_neg_eq (fun a => a.1 = a.2) (s ×ˢ s)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diag_offDiag : Disjoint s.diag s.offDiag :=
disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s ×ˢ s) (s ×ˢ s) (fun a => a.1 = a.2)
theorem product_sdiff_diag : s ×ˢ s \ s.diag = s.offDiag := by
rw [← diag_union_offDiag, union_comm, union_sdiff_self,
sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_offDiag _).symm]
theorem product_sdiff_offDiag : s ×ˢ s \ s.offDiag = s.diag := by
rw [← diag_union_offDiag, union_sdiff_self, sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_offDiag _)]
theorem diag_inter : (s ∩ t).diag = s.diag ∩ t.diag :=
ext fun x => by simpa only [mem_diag, mem_inter] using and_and_right
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.offDiag_inter _ _
theorem diag_union : (s ∪ t).diag = s.diag ∪ t.diag := by
ext ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [mem_diag, mem_union, or_and_right]
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.offDiag_union (disjoint_coe.2 h)
variable (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton : ({a} : Finset α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp [← Finset.card_eq_zero]
theorem diag_singleton : ({a} : Finset α).diag = {(a, a)} := by
rw [← product_sdiff_offDiag, offDiag_singleton, sdiff_empty, singleton_product_singleton]
theorem diag_insert : (insert a s).diag = insert (a, a) s.diag := by
rw [insert_eq, insert_eq, diag_union, diag_singleton]
theorem offDiag_insert (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has), offDiag_singleton,
union_empty, union_right_comm]
theorem offDiag_filter_lt_eq_filter_le {ι} [PartialOrder ι]
[DecidableEq ι] [DecidableLE ι] [DecidableLT ι] (s : Finset ι) :
s.offDiag.filter (fun i => i.1 < i.2) = s.offDiag.filter (fun i => i.1 ≤ i.2) := by
rw [Finset.filter_inj']
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp_rw [mem_offDiag, and_imp]
rintro _ _ h
rw [Ne.le_iff_lt h]
end Diag
end Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Prod.lean | 426 | 428 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
/-!
# Casts of rational numbers into characteristic zero fields (or division rings).
-/
open Function
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
variable [DivisionRing α] [CharZero α] {p q : ℚ}
@[stacks 09FR "Characteristic zero case."]
lemma cast_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ → α)
| ⟨n₁, d₁, d₁0, c₁⟩, ⟨n₂, d₂, d₂0, c₂⟩, h => by
have d₁a : (d₁ : α) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 d₁0
have d₂a : (d₂ : α) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 d₂0
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, mk'_eq_divInt] at h ⊢
rw [cast_divInt_of_ne_zero, cast_divInt_of_ne_zero] at h <;> simp [d₁0, d₂0] at h ⊢
rwa [eq_div_iff_mul_eq d₂a, division_def, mul_assoc, (d₁.cast_commute (d₂ : α)).inv_left₀.eq, ←
mul_assoc, ← division_def, eq_comm, eq_div_iff_mul_eq d₁a, eq_comm, ← Int.cast_natCast d₁, ←
Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_natCast d₂, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj, ← mkRat_eq_iff d₁0 d₂0]
at h
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_inj : (p : α) = q ↔ p = q := cast_injective.eq_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_eq_zero : (p : α) = 0 ↔ p = 0 := cast_injective.eq_iff' cast_zero
lemma cast_ne_zero : (p : α) ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := cast_eq_zero.ne
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_add (p q : ℚ) : ↑(p + q) = (p + q : α) :=
cast_add_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 p.pos.ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 q.pos.ne')
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_sub (p q : ℚ) : ↑(p - q) = (p - q : α) :=
cast_sub_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 p.pos.ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 q.pos.ne')
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_mul (p q : ℚ) : ↑(p * q) = (p * q : α) :=
cast_mul_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 p.pos.ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 q.pos.ne')
variable (α) in
/-- Coercion `ℚ → α` as a `RingHom`. -/
def castHom : ℚ →+* α where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := cast_one
map_mul' := cast_mul
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_add' := cast_add
@[simp] lemma coe_castHom : ⇑(castHom α) = ((↑) : ℚ → α) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_inv (p : ℚ) : ↑(p⁻¹) = (p⁻¹ : α) := map_inv₀ (castHom α) _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_div (p q : ℚ) : ↑(p / q) = (p / q : α) := map_div₀ (castHom α) ..
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_zpow (p : ℚ) (n : ℤ) : ↑(p ^ n) = (p ^ n : α) := map_zpow₀ (castHom α) ..
@[norm_cast]
theorem cast_mk (a b : ℤ) : (a /. b : α) = a / b := by
simp only [divInt_eq_div, cast_div, cast_intCast]
end Rat
namespace NNRat
variable [DivisionSemiring α] [CharZero α] {p q : ℚ≥0}
lemma cast_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → α) := by
rintro p q hpq
rw [NNRat.cast_def, NNRat.cast_def, Commute.div_eq_div_iff] at hpq
on_goal 1 => rw [← p.num_div_den, ← q.num_div_den, div_eq_div_iff]
· norm_cast at hpq ⊢
any_goals norm_cast
any_goals apply den_ne_zero
exact Nat.cast_commute ..
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_inj : (p : α) = q ↔ p = q := cast_injective.eq_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_eq_zero : (q : α) = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_inj]
lemma cast_ne_zero : (q : α) ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 := cast_eq_zero.not
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_add (p q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(p + q) = (p + q : α) :=
cast_add_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 p.den_pos.ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 q.den_pos.ne')
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_mul (p q) : (p * q : ℚ≥0) = (p * q : α) :=
cast_mul_of_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 p.den_pos.ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 q.den_pos.ne')
variable (α) in
/-- Coercion `ℚ≥0 → α` as a `RingHom`. -/
def castHom : ℚ≥0 →+* α where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := cast_one
map_mul' := cast_mul
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_add' := cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castHom : ⇑(castHom α) = (↑) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_inv (p) : (p⁻¹ : ℚ≥0) = (p : α)⁻¹ := map_inv₀ (castHom α) _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_div (p q) : (p / q : ℚ≥0) = (p / q : α) := map_div₀ (castHom α) ..
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_zpow (q : ℚ≥0) (p : ℤ) : ↑(q ^ p) = ((q : α) ^ p : α) := map_zpow₀ (castHom α) ..
@[simp]
lemma cast_divNat (a b : ℕ) : (divNat a b : α) = a / b := by
rw [← cast_natCast, ← cast_natCast b, ← cast_div]
congr
ext
apply Rat.mkRat_eq_div
end NNRat
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/CharZero.lean | 119 | 120 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.NatCast
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Ordered rings and semirings
This file develops the basics of ordered (semi)rings.
Each typeclass here comprises
* an algebraic class (`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`)
* an order class (`PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`)
* assumptions on how both interact ((strict) monotonicity, canonicity)
For short,
* "`+` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of addition"
* "`+` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of addition"
* "`*` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of multiplication by a nonnegative number".
* "`*` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of multiplication by a positive number".
## Typeclasses
* `OrderedSemiring`: Semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect `≤`.
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respects
`<`.
* `OrderedCommSemiring`: Commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect
`≤`.
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+`
and `*` respect `<`.
* `OrderedRing`: Ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `OrderedCommRing`: Commutative ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such that `+`
respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedRing`: Nontrivial ring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*`
respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`: Nontrivial commutative ring with a linear order such that `+` respects
`≤` and `*` respects `<`.
## Hierarchy
The hardest part of proving order lemmas might be to figure out the correct generality and its
corresponding typeclass. Here's an attempt at demystifying it. For each typeclass, we list its
immediate predecessors and what conditions are added to each of them.
* `OrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `≤`
- `Semiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `≤`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommSemiring`
- `OrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `CommSemiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedRing`
- `OrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommRing`
- `OrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `StrictOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommRing` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & nontriviality & `*` respects `<`
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
* `LinearOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
open Function
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered semiring is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R where
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
/-- A strict ordered semiring is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
class IsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the left
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `c * a < c * b`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the right
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `a * c < b * c`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial
lemma IsOrderedRing.of_mul_nonneg [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] (mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b) :
IsOrderedRing R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ hc (sub_nonneg.2 ab)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ (sub_nonneg.2 ab) hc
lemma IsStrictOrderedRing.of_mul_pos [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [Nontrivial R] (mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b) :
IsStrictOrderedRing R where
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ hc (sub_pos.2 ab)
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ (sub_pos.2 ab) hc
section IsOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toPosMulMono : PosMulMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ h x.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toMulPosMono : MulPosMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ h x.2
end IsOrderedRing
/-- Turn an ordered domain into a strict ordered ring. -/
lemma IsOrderedRing.toIsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*)
[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
IsStrictOrderedRing R :=
.of_mul_pos fun _ _ ap bp ↦ (mul_nonneg ap.le bp.le).lt_of_ne' (mul_ne_zero ap.ne' bp.ne')
section IsStrictOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toPosMulStrictMono : PosMulStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toMulPosStrictMono : MulPosStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing R where
__ := ‹IsStrictOrderedRing R›
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toCharZero :
CharZero R where
cast_injective :=
(strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply lt_add_one).injective
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder R :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a + 1, lt_add_of_pos_right _ one_pos⟩⟩
end IsStrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrder
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors R where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab := by
contrapose! hab
obtain ha | ha := hab.1.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hab.2.lt_or_lt
exacts [(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha hb).ne', (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha hb).ne,
(mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ha hb).ne, (mul_pos ha hb).ne']
-- Note that we can't use `NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain` since we are merely in a semiring.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain : IsDomain R where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero {a b c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_left ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_left_of_pos ha).injective h]
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero {b a c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_right ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_right_of_pos ha).injective h]
end LinearOrder
/-! Note that `OrderDual` does not satisfy any of the ordered ring typeclasses due to the
`zero_le_one` field. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedSemiring` is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedAddCommMonoid R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered semiring. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends OrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ha hc :=
-- parentheses ensure this generates an `optParam` rather than an `autoParam`
(by simpa only [mul_comm] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ha hc)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered ring. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of non-negative elements is non-negative. -/
protected mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone
and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends OrderedRing R, CommRing R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid R,
Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- Left multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- Right multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that
addition is strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is strictly monotone
and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered ring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of two positive elements is positive. -/
protected mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommRing (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedRing R, CommRing R
/- It's not entirely clear we should assume `Nontrivial` at this point; it would be reasonable to
explore changing this, but be warned that the instances involving `Domain` may cause typeclass
search loops. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that
addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` is a nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such
that addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedCommSemiring R,
LinearOrderedSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedRing` is a ring with a linear order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedRing R, LinearOrder R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a linear order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends LinearOrderedRing R, CommMonoid R
attribute [nolint docBlame]
StrictOrderedSemiring.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
StrictOrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
LinearOrderedSemiring.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedRing.toLinearOrder
OrderedSemiring.toOrderedAddCommMonoid
OrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
StrictOrderedCommRing.toCommRing
OrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
OrderedCommRing.toCommRing
StrictOrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
LinearOrderedCommSemiring.toLinearOrderedSemiring
LinearOrderedCommRing.toCommMonoid
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b c : R}
lemma one_add_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : a + b + b * c ≤ c) : 1 + a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_add_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : a + c + b * c ≤ b) : 1 + a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : b + b * c ≤ a + c) : 1 - a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm c]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : c + b * c ≤ a + b) : 1 - a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm b]
gcongr
end OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs.lean | 586 | 588 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 549 | 552 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
rcases le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h | h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ i hi =>
rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le (add_le_add_right hi _)
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
end Ring
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 995 | 1,003 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
instance (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel (SameCycle f)] :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f⁻¹) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (f.SameCycle x y) (sameCycle_inv).symm
instance (priority := 100) [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (SameCycle (1 : Perm α)) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (x = y) sameCycle_one.symm
end SameCycle
/-!
### `IsCycle`
-/
section IsCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- A cycle is a non identity permutation where any two nonfixed points of the permutation are
related by repeated application of the permutation. -/
def IsCycle (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, f y ≠ y → SameCycle f x y
theorem IsCycle.ne_one (h : IsCycle f) : f ≠ 1 := fun hf => by simp [hf, IsCycle] at h
@[simp]
theorem not_isCycle_one : ¬(1 : Perm α).IsCycle := fun H => H.ne_one rfl
protected theorem IsCycle.sameCycle (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
SameCycle f x y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 hx
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 hy
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
theorem IsCycle.exists_zpow_eq : IsCycle f → f x ≠ x → f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
IsCycle.sameCycle
theorem IsCycle.inv (hf : IsCycle f) : IsCycle f⁻¹ :=
hf.imp fun _ ⟨hx, h⟩ =>
⟨inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hx.symm, fun _ hy => (h <| inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hy.symm).inv⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_inv : IsCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsCycle f :=
⟨fun h => h.inv, IsCycle.inv⟩
theorem IsCycle.conj : IsCycle f → IsCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx, h⟩
refine ⟨g x, by simp [coe_mul, inv_apply_self, hx], fun y hy => ?_⟩
rw [← apply_inv_self g y]
exact (h <| eq_inv_iff_eq.not.2 hy).conj
protected theorem IsCycle.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
IsCycle g → IsCycle (g.extendDomain f) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩
refine ⟨f a, ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· rw [extendDomain_apply_image]
exact Subtype.coe_injective.ne (f.injective.ne ha)
have h : b = f (f.symm ⟨b, of_not_not <| hb ∘ extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _⟩) := by
rw [apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [h] at hb ⊢
simp only [extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_injective.ne_iff, f.injective.ne_iff] at hb
exact (ha' hb).extendDomain
theorem isCycle_iff_sameCycle (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle f ↔ ∀ {y}, SameCycle f x y ↔ f y ≠ y :=
⟨fun hf y =>
⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ hy =>
hx <| by
rw [← zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy i, (f ^ i).injective.eq_iff] at hi
rw [hi, hy],
hf.exists_zpow_eq hx⟩,
fun h => ⟨x, hx, fun _ hy => h.2 hy⟩⟩
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem IsCycle.exists_pow_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx hy
classical exact
⟨(n % orderOf f).toNat, by
{have := n.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt (orderOf_pos f)))
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this, zpow_mod_orderOf]}⟩
end Finite
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem isCycle_swap (hxy : x ≠ y) : IsCycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa [swap_apply_right], fun a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a) =>
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else
⟨1, by
rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs at * <;> tauto⟩⟩
protected theorem IsSwap.isCycle : IsSwap f → IsCycle f := by
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩
exact isCycle_swap hxy
variable [Fintype α]
theorem IsCycle.two_le_card_support (h : IsCycle f) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
two_le_card_support_of_ne_one h.ne_one
/-- The subgroup generated by a cycle is in bijection with its support -/
noncomputable def IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) :
(Subgroup.zpowers σ) ≃ σ.support :=
Equiv.ofBijective
(fun (τ : ↥ ((Subgroup.zpowers σ) : Set (Perm α))) =>
⟨(τ : Perm α) (Classical.choose hσ), by
obtain ⟨τ, n, rfl⟩ := τ
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
exact (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1⟩)
(by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, m, rfl⟩ ⟨b, n, rfl⟩ h
ext y
by_cases hy : σ y = y
· simp_rw [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy]
· obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_comm σ m i, zpow_apply_comm σ n i]
exact congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_support] at hy
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
exact ⟨⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) {n : ℕ} :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport ⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ =
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_symm_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) (n : ℕ) :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ =
⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ :=
(Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 hσ.zpowersEquivSupport_apply
protected theorem IsCycle.orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) : orderOf f = #f.support := by
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers, ← Fintype.card_coe]
convert Fintype.card_congr (IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport hf)
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℕ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => exact fun _ h => ⟨0, h⟩
| succ n hn =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb' : (swap x (f x) * f) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx), Ne, ←
f.injective.eq_iff, apply_inv_self]
exact this.1
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn hb' (f.injective <| by
rw [apply_inv_self]; rwa [pow_succ', mul_apply] at h)
⟨i + 1, by
rw [add_comm, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, zpow_one, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb).2 (Ne.symm hfbx)]⟩
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℤ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n
| negSucc n =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx' : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx'⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [inv_eq_iff_eq, Perm.mul_apply, zpow_negSucc, Ne, Perm.apply_inv_self] at *
<;> tauto
let ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb
(show (f⁻¹ ^ n) (f⁻¹ x) = f⁻¹ b by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, zpow_negSucc,
← inv_pow, pow_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, mul_one, zpow_natCast,
← pow_succ', ← pow_succ])
have h : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f x) = f⁻¹ x := by
rw [mul_apply, inv_apply_self, swap_apply_left]
⟨-i, by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right i 1, neg_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_one, zpow_neg,
← inv_zpow, mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, inv_apply_self, swap_comm _ x,
zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply, mul_apply (_ ^ i), h, hi, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx')]⟩
theorem IsCycle.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α}
(hf : IsCycle f) {x : α} (hfx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) = x) : f = swap x (f x) :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hz.2 hfx
if hyx : y = x then by simp [hyx]
else
if hfyx : y = f x then by simp [hfyx, hffx]
else by
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hyx hfyx]
refine by_contradiction fun hy => ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hz.2 hy
rw [← sub_add_cancel j i, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi] at hj
rcases zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx (j - i) with hji | hji
· rw [← hj, hji] at hyx
tauto
· rw [← hj, hji] at hfyx
tauto
theorem IsCycle.swap_mul {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : IsCycle (swap x (f x) * f) :=
⟨f x, by simp [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, if_neg hffx, f.injective.eq_iff, if_neg hx, hx],
fun y hy =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy).1
have hi : (f ^ (i - 1)) (f x) = y :=
calc
(f ^ (i - 1) : Perm α) (f x) = (f ^ (i - 1) * f ^ (1 : ℤ) : Perm α) x := by simp
_ = y := by rwa [← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel]
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ (i - 1) hy hi⟩
theorem IsCycle.sign {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) : sign f = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
calc
Perm.sign f = Perm.sign (swap x (f x) * (swap x (f x) * f)) := by
{rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def, mul_def, swap_swap, trans_refl]}
_ = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
if h1 : f (f x) = x then by
have h : swap x (f x) * f = 1 := by
simp only [mul_def, one_def]
rw [hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, swap_apply_left, swap_swap]
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, h, sign_one,
hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, card_support_swap hx.1.symm]
rfl
else by
have h : #(swap x (f x) * f).support + 1 = #f.support := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_support.2 hx.1), support_swap_mul_eq _ _ h1,
card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_erase _ _), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
have : #(swap x (f x) * f).support < #f.support := card_support_swap_mul hx.1
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, (hf.swap_mul hx.1 h1).sign, ← h]
simp only [mul_neg, neg_mul, one_mul, neg_neg, pow_add, pow_one, mul_one]
termination_by #f.support
theorem IsCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
have key : ∀ x : α, (f ^ n) x ≠ x ↔ f x ≠ x := by
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.ext_iff]
exact (support_pow_le _ n).antisymm h2
obtain ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ := h1
refine ⟨x, (key x).mp hx1, fun y hy => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ := hx2 ((key y).mpr hy)
exact ⟨n * i, by rwa [zpow_mul]⟩
-- The lemma `support_zpow_le` is relevant. It means that `h2` is equivalent to
-- `σ.support = (σ ^ n).support`, as well as to `#σ.support ≤ #(σ ^ n).support`.
theorem IsCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
cases n
· exact h1.of_pow h2
· simp only [le_eq_subset, zpow_negSucc, Perm.support_inv] at h1 h2
exact (inv_inv (f ^ _) ▸ h1.inv).of_pow h2
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles {l : List (Perm β)} (h1 : ∀ f ∈ l, IsCycle f)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup :=
nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint (fun h => (h1 1 h).ne_one rfl) h2
/-- Unlike `support_congr`, which assumes that `∀ (x ∈ g.support), f x = g x)`, here
we have the weaker assumption that `∀ (x ∈ f.support), f x = g x`. -/
theorem IsCycle.support_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g) (h : f.support ⊆ g.support)
(h' : ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
have : f.support = g.support := by
refine le_antisymm h ?_
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := id hf
have hx' : g x ≠ x := by rwa [← h' x (mem_support.mpr hx)]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hg.exists_pow_eq hx' (mem_support.mp hz)
have h'' : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x := by
intro x hx
exact h' x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)
rwa [← hm, ←
pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h'' _ x
(mem_inter_of_mem (mem_support.mpr hx) (mem_support.mpr hx')),
pow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
refine Equiv.Perm.support_congr h ?_
simpa [← this] using h'
/-- If two cyclic permutations agree on all terms in their intersection,
and that intersection is not empty, then the two cyclic permutations must be equal. -/
theorem IsCycle.eq_on_support_inter_nonempty_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g)
(h : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x)
(hx : f x = g x) (hx' : x ∈ f.support) : f = g := by
have hx'' : x ∈ g.support := by rwa [mem_support, ← hx, ← mem_support]
have : f.support ⊆ g.support := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq (mem_support.mp hx') (mem_support.mp hy)
rwa [pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h _ _ (mem_inter_of_mem hx' hx''), pow_apply_mem_support]
rw [inter_eq_left.mpr this] at h
exact hf.support_congr hg this h
theorem IsCycle.support_pow_eq_iff (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
support (f ^ n) = support f ↔ ¬orderOf f ∣ n := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h H
refine hf.ne_one ?_
rw [← support_eq_empty_iff, ← h, H, support_one]
· intro H
apply le_antisymm (support_pow_le _ n) _
intro x hx
contrapose! H
ext z
by_cases hz : f z = z
· rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hz, one_apply]
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq hz (mem_support.mp hx)
apply (f ^ k).injective
rw [← mul_apply, (Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq, mul_apply]
simpa using H
theorem IsCycle.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n)
(hn : n < orderOf f) : (f ^ n).support = f.support :=
hf.support_pow_eq_iff.2 <| Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt npos hn
theorem IsCycle.pow_iff [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
IsCycle (f ^ n) ↔ n.Coprime (orderOf f) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
constructor
· intro h
have hr : support (f ^ n) = support f := by
rw [hf.support_pow_eq_iff]
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
refine h.ne_one ?_
simp [pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
have : orderOf (f ^ n) = orderOf f := by rw [h.orderOf, hr, hf.orderOf]
rw [orderOf_pow, Nat.div_eq_self] at this
rcases this with h | _
· exact absurd h (orderOf_pos _).ne'
· rwa [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm]
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime h
have hf' : IsCycle ((f ^ n) ^ m) := by rwa [hm]
refine hf'.of_pow fun x hx => ?_
rw [hm]
exact support_pow_le _ n hx
-- TODO: Define a `Set`-valued support to get rid of the `Finite β` assumption
theorem IsCycle.pow_eq_one_iff [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
f ^ n = 1 ↔ ∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ (f ^ n) x = x := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
exact ⟨x, hx, by simp [h]⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
by_cases h : support (f ^ n) = support f
· rw [← mem_support, ← h, mem_support] at hx
contradiction
· rw [hf.support_pow_eq_iff, Classical.not_not] at h
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
rw [pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
-- TODO: Define a `Set`-valued support to get rid of the `Finite β` assumption
theorem IsCycle.pow_eq_one_iff' [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} {x : β}
(hx : f x ≠ x) : f ^ n = 1 ↔ (f ^ n) x = x :=
⟨fun h => DFunLike.congr_fun h x, fun h => hf.pow_eq_one_iff.2 ⟨x, hx, h⟩⟩
-- TODO: Define a `Set`-valued support to get rid of the `Finite β` assumption
theorem IsCycle.pow_eq_one_iff'' [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
f ^ n = 1 ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ x → (f ^ n) x = x :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (hf.pow_eq_one_iff' hx).1 h, fun h =>
let ⟨_, hx, _⟩ := id hf
(hf.pow_eq_one_iff' hx).2 (h _ hx)⟩
-- TODO: Define a `Set`-valued support to get rid of the `Finite β` assumption
theorem IsCycle.pow_eq_pow_iff [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {a b : ℕ} :
f ^ a = f ^ b ↔ ∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ (f ^ a) x = (f ^ b) x := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
exact ⟨x, hx, by simp [h]⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
wlog hab : a ≤ b generalizing a b
· exact (this hx'.symm (le_of_not_le hab)).symm
suffices f ^ (b - a) = 1 by
rw [pow_sub _ hab, mul_inv_eq_one] at this
rw [this]
rw [hf.pow_eq_one_iff]
by_cases hfa : (f ^ a) x ∈ f.support
· refine ⟨(f ^ a) x, mem_support.mp hfa, ?_⟩
simp only [pow_sub _ hab, Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, inv_apply_self, ← hx']
· have h := @Equiv.Perm.zpow_apply_comm _ f 1 a x
simp only [zpow_one, zpow_natCast] at h
rw [not_mem_support, h, Function.Injective.eq_iff (f ^ a).injective] at hfa
contradiction
theorem IsCycle.isCycle_pow_pos_of_lt_prime_order [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f)
(hf' : (orderOf f).Prime) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (hn' : n < orderOf f) : IsCycle (f ^ n) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
have : n.Coprime (orderOf f) := by
refine Nat.Coprime.symm ?_
rw [Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hf']
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt hn hn'
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime this
have hf'' := hf
rw [← hm] at hf''
refine hf''.of_pow ?_
rw [hm]
exact support_pow_le f n
end IsCycle
open Equiv
theorem _root_.Int.addLeft_one_isCycle : (Equiv.addLeft 1 : Perm ℤ).IsCycle :=
⟨0, one_ne_zero, fun n _ => ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩
theorem _root_.Int.addRight_one_isCycle : (Equiv.addRight 1 : Perm ℤ).IsCycle :=
⟨0, one_ne_zero, fun n _ => ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩
section Conjugation
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {σ τ : Perm α}
theorem IsCycle.isConj (hσ : IsCycle σ) (hτ : IsCycle τ) (h : #σ.support = #τ.support) :
IsConj σ τ := by
refine
isConj_of_support_equiv
(hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm.trans <|
(zpowersEquivZPowers <| by rw [hσ.orderOf, h, hτ.orderOf]).trans hτ.zpowersEquivSupport)
?_
intro x hx
simp only [Perm.mul_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.sumCongr_apply]
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hσ.exists_pow_eq (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1 (mem_support.1 hx)
simp [← Perm.mul_apply, ← pow_succ']
theorem IsCycle.isConj_iff (hσ : IsCycle σ) (hτ : IsCycle τ) :
IsConj σ τ ↔ #σ.support = #τ.support where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := (_root_.isConj_iff).1 h
refine Finset.card_bij (fun a _ => π a) (fun _ ha => ?_) (fun _ _ _ _ ab => π.injective ab)
fun b hb ↦ ⟨π⁻¹ b, ?_, π.apply_inv_self b⟩
· simp [mem_support.1 ha]
contrapose! hb
rw [mem_support, Classical.not_not] at hb
rw [mem_support, Classical.not_not, Perm.mul_apply, Perm.mul_apply, hb, Perm.apply_inv_self]
mpr := hσ.isConj hτ
end Conjugation
/-! ### `IsCycleOn` -/
section IsCycleOn
variable {f g : Perm α} {s t : Set α} {a b x y : α}
/-- A permutation is a cycle on `s` when any two points of `s` are related by repeated application
of the permutation. Note that this means the identity is a cycle of subsingleton sets. -/
def IsCycleOn (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
Set.BijOn f s s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → f.SameCycle x y
@[simp]
theorem isCycleOn_empty : f.IsCycleOn ∅ := by simp [IsCycleOn, Set.bijOn_empty]
@[simp]
theorem isCycleOn_one : (1 : Perm α).IsCycleOn s ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [IsCycleOn, Set.bijOn_id, Set.Subsingleton]
alias ⟨IsCycleOn.subsingleton, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.isCycleOn_one⟩ := isCycleOn_one
@[simp]
theorem isCycleOn_singleton : f.IsCycleOn {a} ↔ f a = a := by simp [IsCycleOn, SameCycle.rfl]
theorem isCycleOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : f.IsCycleOn s :=
⟨s.bijOn_of_subsingleton _, fun x _ y _ => (Subsingleton.elim x y).sameCycle _⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycleOn_inv : f⁻¹.IsCycleOn s ↔ f.IsCycleOn s := by
simp only [IsCycleOn, sameCycle_inv, and_congr_left_iff]
exact fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ Set.BijOn.perm_inv h, fun h ↦ Set.BijOn.perm_inv h⟩
alias ⟨IsCycleOn.of_inv, IsCycleOn.inv⟩ := isCycleOn_inv
theorem IsCycleOn.conj (h : f.IsCycleOn s) : (g * f * g⁻¹).IsCycleOn ((g : Perm α) '' s) :=
⟨(g.bijOn_image.comp h.1).comp g.bijOn_symm_image, fun x hx y hy => by
rw [← preimage_inv] at hx hy
convert Equiv.Perm.SameCycle.conj (h.2 hx hy) (g := g) <;> rw [apply_inv_self]⟩
theorem isCycleOn_swap [DecidableEq α] (hab : a ≠ b) : (swap a b).IsCycleOn {a, b} :=
⟨bijOn_swap (by simp) (by simp), fun x hx y hy => by
rw [Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx hy
obtain rfl | rfl := hx <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hy
· exact ⟨0, by rw [zpow_zero, coe_one, id]⟩
· exact ⟨1, by rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_left]⟩
· exact ⟨1, by rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_right]⟩
· exact ⟨0, by rw [zpow_zero, coe_one, id]⟩⟩
protected theorem IsCycleOn.apply_ne (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (hs : s.Nontrivial) (ha : a ∈ s) :
f a ≠ a := by
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs.exists_ne a
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hf.2 ha hb
exact fun h => hba (IsFixedPt.perm_zpow h n)
protected theorem IsCycle.isCycleOn (hf : f.IsCycle) : f.IsCycleOn { x | f x ≠ x } :=
⟨f.bijOn fun _ => f.apply_eq_iff_eq.not, fun _ ha _ => hf.sameCycle ha⟩
/-- This lemma demonstrates the relation between `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`
in non-degenerate cases. -/
theorem isCycle_iff_exists_isCycleOn :
f.IsCycle ↔ ∃ s : Set α, s.Nontrivial ∧ f.IsCycleOn s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, ¬IsFixedPt f x → x ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ⟨{ x | f x ≠ x }, ?_, hf.isCycleOn, fun _ => id⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf
exact ⟨f a, f.injective.ne ha.1, a, ha.1, ha.1⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hf, hsf⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.nonempty
exact ⟨a, hf.apply_ne hs ha, fun b hb => hf.2 ha <| hsf hb⟩
theorem IsCycleOn.apply_mem_iff (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) : f x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun hx => by
convert hf.1.perm_inv.1 hx
rw [inv_apply_self], fun hx => hf.1.mapsTo hx⟩
/-- Note that the identity satisfies `IsCycleOn` for any subsingleton set, but not `IsCycle`. -/
theorem IsCycleOn.isCycle_subtypePerm (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
(f.subtypePerm fun _ => hf.apply_mem_iff.symm : Perm s).IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.nonempty
exact
⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ne_of_apply_ne ((↑) : s → α) (hf.apply_ne hs ha), fun b _ =>
(hf.2 (⟨a, ha⟩ : s).2 b.2).subtypePerm⟩
/-- Note that the identity is a cycle on any subsingleton set, but not a cycle. -/
protected theorem IsCycleOn.subtypePerm (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) :
(f.subtypePerm fun _ => hf.apply_mem_iff.symm : Perm s).IsCycleOn _root_.Set.univ := by
obtain hs | hs := s.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
· haveI := hs.coe_sort
exact isCycleOn_of_subsingleton _ _
convert (hf.isCycle_subtypePerm hs).isCycleOn
rw [eq_comm, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
exact fun x => ne_of_apply_ne ((↑) : s → α) (hf.apply_ne hs x.2)
-- TODO: Theory of order of an element under an action
theorem IsCycleOn.pow_apply_eq {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) {n : ℕ} :
(f ^ n) a = a ↔ #s ∣ n := by
obtain rfl | hs := Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
· rw [coe_singleton, isCycleOn_singleton] at hf
simpa using IsFixedPt.iterate hf n
classical
have h (x : s) : ¬f x = x := hf.apply_ne hs x.2
have := (hf.isCycle_subtypePerm hs).orderOf
simp only [coe_sort_coe, support_subtype_perm, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true, univ_eq_attach,
mem_attach, imp_self, implies_true, filter_true_of_mem, card_attach] at this
rw [← this, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one,
(hf.isCycle_subtypePerm hs).pow_eq_one_iff'
(ne_of_apply_ne ((↑) : s → α) <| hf.apply_ne hs (⟨a, ha⟩ : s).2)]
simp [-coe_sort_coe]
theorem IsCycleOn.zpow_apply_eq {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
∀ {n : ℤ}, (f ^ n) a = a ↔ (#s : ℤ) ∣ n
| Int.ofNat _ => (hf.pow_apply_eq ha).trans Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.symm
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow]
exact (hf.inv.pow_apply_eq ha).trans (dvd_neg.trans Int.natCast_dvd_natCast).symm
theorem IsCycleOn.pow_apply_eq_pow_apply {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s)
{m n : ℕ} : (f ^ m) a = (f ^ n) a ↔ m ≡ n [MOD #s] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd, ← hf.zpow_apply_eq ha]
simp [sub_eq_neg_add, zpow_add, eq_inv_iff_eq, eq_comm]
theorem IsCycleOn.zpow_apply_eq_zpow_apply {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s)
{m n : ℤ} : (f ^ m) a = (f ^ n) a ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD #s] := by
rw [Int.modEq_iff_dvd, ← hf.zpow_apply_eq ha]
simp [sub_eq_neg_add, zpow_add, eq_inv_iff_eq, eq_comm]
theorem IsCycleOn.pow_card_apply {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
(f ^ #s) a = a :=
(hf.pow_apply_eq ha).2 dvd_rfl
theorem IsCycleOn.exists_pow_eq {s : Finset α} (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
∃ n < #s, (f ^ n) a = b := by
classical
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hf.2 ha hb
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (Int.mod_modEq n #s).symm.dvd
refine ⟨n.natMod #s, Int.natMod_lt (Nonempty.card_pos ⟨a, ha⟩).ne', ?_⟩
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natMod,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2
(Nonempty.card_pos ⟨a, ha⟩).ne'), sub_eq_iff_eq_add'.1 hk, zpow_add, zpow_mul]
simp only [zpow_natCast, coe_mul, comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
exact IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (hf.pow_card_apply ha) _
theorem IsCycleOn.exists_pow_eq' (hs : s.Finite) (hf : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
∃ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) a = b := by
lift s to Finset α using id hs
obtain ⟨n, -, hn⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq ha hb
exact ⟨n, hn⟩
theorem IsCycleOn.range_pow (hs : s.Finite) (h : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
Set.range (fun n => (f ^ n) a : ℕ → α) = s :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (Set.range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => h.1.mapsTo.perm_pow _ ha) fun _ =>
h.exists_pow_eq' hs ha
theorem IsCycleOn.range_zpow (h : f.IsCycleOn s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
Set.range (fun n => (f ^ n) a : ℤ → α) = s :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (Set.range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => (h.1.perm_zpow _).mapsTo ha) <| h.2 ha
theorem IsCycleOn.of_pow {n : ℕ} (hf : (f ^ n).IsCycleOn s) (h : Set.BijOn f s s) : f.IsCycleOn s :=
⟨h, fun _ hx _ hy => (hf.2 hx hy).of_pow⟩
theorem IsCycleOn.of_zpow {n : ℤ} (hf : (f ^ n).IsCycleOn s) (h : Set.BijOn f s s) :
f.IsCycleOn s :=
⟨h, fun _ hx _ hy => (hf.2 hx hy).of_zpow⟩
theorem IsCycleOn.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p)
(h : g.IsCycleOn s) : (g.extendDomain f).IsCycleOn ((↑) ∘ f '' s) :=
⟨h.1.extendDomain, by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact (h.2 ha hb).extendDomain⟩
protected theorem IsCycleOn.countable (hs : f.IsCycleOn s) : s.Countable := by
obtain rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Set.countable_empty
· exact (Set.countable_range fun n : ℤ => (⇑(f ^ n) : α → α) a).mono (hs.2 ha)
end IsCycleOn
end Equiv.Perm
|
namespace List
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {l : List α}
theorem Nodup.isCycleOn_formPerm (h : l.Nodup) :
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 843 | 850 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
|
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 447 | 450 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.PUnit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
/-!
# The category of monoids in a monoidal category.
We define monoids in a monoidal category `C` and show that the category of monoids is equivalent to
the category of lax monoidal functors from the unit monoidal category to `C`. We also show that if
`C` is braided, then the category of monoids is naturally monoidal.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ u
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
/-- A monoid object internal to a monoidal category.
When the monoidal category is preadditive, this is also sometimes called an "algebra object".
-/
class Mon_Class (X : C) where
/-- The unit morphism of a monoid object. -/
one : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X
/-- The multiplication morphism of a monoid object. -/
mul : X ⊗ X ⟶ X
/- For the names of the conditions below, the unprimed names are reserved for the version where
the argument `X` is explicit. -/
one_mul' : one ▷ X ≫ mul = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
mul_one' : X ◁ one ≫ mul = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
-- Obviously there is some flexibility stating this axiom.
-- This one has left- and right-hand sides matching the statement of `Monoid.mul_assoc`,
-- and chooses to place the associator on the right-hand side.
-- The heuristic is that unitors and associators "don't have much weight".
mul_assoc' : (mul ▷ X) ≫ mul = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ (X ◁ mul) ≫ mul := by aesop_cat
namespace Mon_Class
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "μ" => Mon_Class.mul
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "μ["M"]" => Mon_Class.mul (X := M)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "η" => Mon_Class.one
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "η["M"]" => Mon_Class.one (X := M)
/- The simp attribute is reserved for the unprimed versions. -/
attribute [reassoc] one_mul' mul_one' mul_assoc'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem one_mul (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : η ▷ X ≫ μ = (λ_ X).hom := one_mul'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_one (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : X ◁ η ≫ μ = (ρ_ X).hom := mul_one'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_assoc (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : μ ▷ X ≫ μ = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ X ◁ μ ≫ μ := mul_assoc'
@[ext]
theorem ext {X : C} (h₁ h₂ : Mon_Class X) (H : h₁.mul = h₂.mul) : h₁ = h₂ := by
suffices h₁.one = h₂.one by cases h₁; cases h₂; subst H this; rfl
trans (λ_ _).inv ≫ (h₁.one ⊗ h₂.one) ≫ h₁.mul
· simp [tensorHom_def, H, ← unitors_equal]
· simp [tensorHom_def']
end Mon_Class
open scoped Mon_Class
variable {M N : C} [Mon_Class M] [Mon_Class N]
/-- The property that a morphism between monoid objects is a monoid morphism. -/
class IsMon_Hom (f : M ⟶ N) : Prop where
one_hom (f) : η ≫ f = η := by aesop_cat
mul_hom (f) : μ ≫ f = (f ⊗ f) ≫ μ := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsMon_Hom.one_hom IsMon_Hom.mul_hom
variable (C)
/-- A monoid object internal to a monoidal category.
When the monoidal category is preadditive, this is also sometimes called an "algebra object".
-/
structure Mon_ where
/-- The underlying object in the ambient monoidal category -/
X : C
/-- The unit morphism of the monoid object -/
one : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X
/-- The multiplication morphism of a monoid object -/
mul : X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_mul : (one ▷ X) ≫ mul = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
mul_one : (X ◁ one) ≫ mul = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
-- Obviously there is some flexibility stating this axiom.
-- This one has left- and right-hand sides matching the statement of `Monoid.mul_assoc`,
-- and chooses to place the associator on the right-hand side.
-- The heuristic is that unitors and associators "don't have much weight".
mul_assoc : (mul ▷ X) ≫ mul = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ (X ◁ mul) ≫ mul := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
attribute [simp] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
-- We prove a more general `@[simp]` lemma below.
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Mon_.mul_assoc
namespace Mon_
variable {C}
/-- Construct an object of `Mon_ C` from an object `X : C` and `Mon_Class X` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : Mon_ C where
X := X
one := η
mul := μ
instance {M : Mon_ C} : Mon_Class M.X where
one := M.one
mul := M.mul
one_mul' := M.one_mul
mul_one' := M.mul_one
mul_assoc' := M.mul_assoc
variable (C)
/-- The trivial monoid object. We later show this is initial in `Mon_ C`.
-/
@[simps]
def trivial : Mon_ C where
X := 𝟙_ C
one := 𝟙 _
mul := (λ_ _).hom
mul_assoc := by monoidal_coherence
mul_one := by monoidal_coherence
instance : Inhabited (Mon_ C) :=
⟨trivial C⟩
variable {C}
variable {M : Mon_ C}
@[simp]
theorem one_mul_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (M.one ⊗ f) ≫ M.mul = (λ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def'_assoc, M.one_mul, leftUnitor_naturality]
@[simp]
theorem mul_one_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (f ⊗ M.one) ≫ M.mul = (ρ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def_assoc, M.mul_one, rightUnitor_naturality]
theorem mul_assoc_flip :
(M.X ◁ M.mul) ≫ M.mul = (α_ M.X M.X M.X).inv ≫ (M.mul ▷ M.X) ≫ M.mul := by simp
/-- A morphism of monoid objects. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (M N : Mon_ C) where
/-- The underlying morphism -/
hom : M.X ⟶ N.X
one_hom : M.one ≫ hom = N.one := by aesop_cat
mul_hom : M.mul ≫ hom = (hom ⊗ hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat
/-- Construct a morphism `M ⟶ N` of `Mon_ C` from a map `f : M ⟶ N` and a `IsMon_Hom f` instance. -/
abbrev Hom.mk' {M N : C} [Mon_Class M] [Mon_Class N] (f : M ⟶ N) [IsMon_Hom f] :
Hom (.mk' M) (.mk' N) := .mk f
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.one_hom Hom.mul_hom
/-- The identity morphism on a monoid object. -/
@[simps]
def id (M : Mon_ C) : Hom M M where
hom := 𝟙 M.X
instance homInhabited (M : Mon_ C) : Inhabited (Hom M M) :=
⟨id M⟩
/-- Composition of morphisms of monoid objects. -/
@[simps]
def comp {M N O : Mon_ C} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N O) : Hom M O where
hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom
instance : Category (Mon_ C) where
Hom M N := Hom M N
id := id
comp f g := comp f g
instance {M N : Mon_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) : IsMon_Hom f.hom := ⟨f.2, f.3⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : Mon_ C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g :=
Hom.ext w
@[simp]
theorem id_hom' (M : Mon_ C) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M).hom = 𝟙 M.X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom' {M N K : Mon_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
(f ≫ g : Hom M K).hom = f.hom ≫ g.hom :=
rfl
section
variable (C)
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category. -/
@[simps]
def forget : Mon_ C ⥤ C where
obj A := A.X
map f := f.hom
end
instance forget_faithful : (forget C).Faithful where
instance {A B : Mon_ C} (f : A ⟶ B) [e : IsIso ((forget C).map f)] : IsIso f.hom :=
e
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category reflects isomorphisms. -/
instance : (forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects f e := ⟨⟨{ hom := inv f.hom }, by aesop_cat⟩⟩
/-- Construct an isomorphism of monoids by giving an isomorphism between the underlying objects
and checking compatibility with unit and multiplication only in the forward direction.
-/
@[simps]
def mkIso {M N : Mon_ C} (f : M.X ≅ N.X) (one_f : M.one ≫ f.hom = N.one := by aesop_cat)
(mul_f : M.mul ≫ f.hom = (f.hom ⊗ f.hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat) : M ≅ N where
hom := { hom := f.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := f.inv
one_hom := by rw [← one_f]; simp
mul_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [mul_f]
simp }
@[simps]
instance uniqueHomFromTrivial (A : Mon_ C) : Unique (trivial C ⟶ A) where
default :=
{ hom := A.one
mul_hom := by simp [A.one_mul, unitors_equal] }
uniq f := by
ext
simp only [trivial_X]
rw [← Category.id_comp f.hom]
erw [f.one_hom]
open CategoryTheory.Limits
instance : HasInitial (Mon_ C) :=
hasInitial_of_unique (trivial C)
end Mon_
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
section LaxMonoidal
variable [F.LaxMonoidal] (X Y : C) [Mon_Class X] [Mon_Class Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsMon_Hom f]
/-- The image of a monoid object under a lax monoidal functor is a monoid object. -/
abbrev obj.instMon_Class : Mon_Class (F.obj X) where
one := ε F ≫ F.map η
mul := LaxMonoidal.μ F X X ≫ F.map μ
one_mul' := by simp [← F.map_comp]
mul_one' := by simp [← F.map_comp]
mul_assoc' := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, Mon_Class.mul_assoc]
simp
attribute [local instance] obj.instMon_Class
@[reassoc, simp] lemma obj.η_def : (η : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj X) = ε F ≫ F.map η := rfl
@[reassoc, simp] lemma obj.μ_def : μ = LaxMonoidal.μ F X X ≫ F.map μ := rfl
instance map.instIsMon_Hom : IsMon_Hom (F.map f) where
one_hom := by simp [← map_comp]
mul_hom := by simp [← map_comp]
-- TODO: mapMod F A : Mod A ⥤ Mod (F.mapMon A)
/-- A lax monoidal functor takes monoid objects to monoid objects.
That is, a lax monoidal functor `F : C ⥤ D` induces a functor `Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D`.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMon (F : C ⥤ D) [F.LaxMonoidal] : Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
-- TODO: The following could be, but it leads to weird `erw`s later down the file
-- obj A := .mk' (F.obj A.X)
obj A :=
{ X := F.obj A.X
one := ε F ≫ F.map A.one
mul := «μ» F _ _ ≫ F.map A.mul
one_mul := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
LaxMonoidal.left_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.one_mul]
mul_one := by
simp_rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc,
LaxMonoidal.right_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.mul_one]
mul_assoc := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.mul_assoc]
simp }
map f := .mk' (F.map f.hom)
protected instance Faithful.mapMon [F.Faithful] : F.mapMon.Faithful where
map_injective {_X _Y} _f _g hfg := Mon_.Hom.ext <| map_injective congr(($hfg).hom)
end LaxMonoidal
section Monoidal
variable [F.Monoidal]
attribute [local instance] obj.instMon_Class
protected instance Full.mapMon [F.Full] [F.Faithful] : F.mapMon.Full where
map_surjective {X Y} f :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := F.map_surjective f.hom
⟨{
hom := g
one_hom := F.map_injective <| by simpa [← hg, cancel_epi] using f.one_hom
mul_hom := F.map_injective <| by simpa [← hg, cancel_epi] using f.mul_hom
}, Mon_.Hom.ext hg⟩
instance FullyFaithful.isMon_Hom_preimage (hF : F.FullyFaithful) {X Y : C}
[Mon_Class X] [Mon_Class Y] (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) [IsMon_Hom f] :
IsMon_Hom (hF.preimage f) where
one_hom := hF.map_injective <| by simp [← obj.η_def_assoc, ← obj.η_def, ← cancel_epi (ε F)]
mul_hom := hF.map_injective <| by
simp [← obj.μ_def_assoc, ← obj.μ_def, ← μ_natural_assoc, ← cancel_epi (LaxMonoidal.μ F ..)]
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is a fully faithful monoidal functor, then `Mon(F) : Mon C ⥤ Mon D` is fully
faithful too. -/
protected def FullyFaithful.mapMon (hF : F.FullyFaithful) : F.mapMon.FullyFaithful where
preimage {X Y} f := .mk' <| hF.preimage f.hom
end Monoidal
|
variable (C D)
/-- `mapMon` is functorial in the lax monoidal functor. -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: added this, not sure how it worked previously without.
def mapMonFunctor : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D ⥤ Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
obj F := F.mapMon
map α := { app := fun A => { hom := α.hom.app A.X } }
map_comp _ _ := rfl
end CategoryTheory.Functor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Mon_.lean | 351 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.ToSquareZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EssentialFiniteness
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
/-!
# The module of kaehler differentials
## Main results
- `KaehlerDifferential`: The module of kaehler differentials. For an `R`-algebra `S`, we provide
the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.D`: The derivation into the module of kaehler differentials.
- `KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation`: The image of `D` spans `Ω[S⁄R]` as an `S`-module.
- `KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation`:
The isomorphism `Hom_R(Ω[S⁄R], M) ≃ₗ[S] Der_R(S, M)`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.quotKerTotalEquiv`: An alternative description of `Ω[S⁄R]` as `S` copies
of `S` with kernel (`KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal`) generated by the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
- `KaehlerDifferential.map`: Given a map between the arrows `R →+* A` and `S →+* B`, we have an
`A`-linear map `Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄S]`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.map_surjective`:
The sequence `Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A] → 0` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_mapBaseChange_map`:
The sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_kerCotangentToTensor_mapBaseChange`:
If `A → B` is surjective with kernel `I`, then
the sequence `I/I² → B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.mapBaseChange_surjective`:
If `A → B` is surjective, then the sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → 0` is exact.
## Future project
- Define the `IsKaehlerDifferential` predicate.
-/
suppress_compilation
section KaehlerDifferential
open scoped TensorProduct
open Algebra Finsupp
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
/-- The kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`. -/
abbrev KaehlerDifferential.ideal : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) :=
RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S)
variable {S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal (a : S) :
(1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] a - a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) ∈ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable {R}
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- For a `R`-derivation `S → M`, this is the map `S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M` sending `s ⊗ₜ t ↦ s • D t`. -/
def Derivation.tensorProductTo (D : Derivation R S M) : S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift ((LinearMap.lsmul S (S →ₗ[R] M)).flip D.toLinearMap)
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul (D : Derivation R S M) (s t : S) :
D.tensorProductTo (s ⊗ₜ t) = s • D t := rfl
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul (D : Derivation R S M) (x y : S ⊗[R] S) :
D.tensorProductTo (x * y) =
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x • D.tensorProductTo y +
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R y • D.tensorProductTo x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [zero_mul, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x₁ x₂
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [mul_zero, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x y
simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo,
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul',
TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul]
dsimp
rw [D.leibniz]
simp only [smul_smul, smul_add, mul_comm (x * y) x₁, mul_right_comm x₁ x₂, ← mul_assoc]
variable (R S)
/-- The kernel of `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S` is generated by `1 ⊗ s - s ⊗ 1` as a `S`-module. -/
theorem KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal :
Submodule.span S (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· rintro x (hx : _ = _)
have : x - TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x := by
rw [hx, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]
rw [← this]
clear this hx
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [map_zero, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]; exact zero_mem _
· intro x y
have : x ⊗ₜ[R] y - (x * y) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x • ((1 : S) ⊗ₜ y - y ⊗ₜ (1 : S)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul, this]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ x ?_
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact Set.mem_range_self y
· intro x y hx hy
rw [map_add, TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← sub_add_sub_comm]
exact add_mem hx hy
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal :
Ideal.span (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· change (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S ≤ (Ideal.span _).restrictScalars S
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span]
conv_rhs => rw [← Submodule.span_span_of_tower S]
exact Submodule.subset_span
/-- The module of Kähler differentials (Kahler differentials, Kaehler differentials).
This is implemented as `I / I ^ 2` with `I` the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
To view elements as a linear combination of the form `s • D s'`, use
`KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective` and `Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul`.
We also provide the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
-/
def KaehlerDifferential : Type v :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance : AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential R S) := inferInstanceAs <|
AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance KaehlerDifferential.module : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential R S) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.moduleOfTower _
@[inherit_doc KaehlerDifferential]
notation:100 "Ω[" S "⁄" R "]" => KaehlerDifferential R S
instance : Nonempty (Ω[S⁄R]) := ⟨0⟩
instance KaehlerDifferential.module' {R' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [Algebra R' S]
[SMulCommClass R R' S] :
Module R' (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.module' _
instance : IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.isScalarTower _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower {R₁ R₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂]
[Algebra R₁ S] [Algebra R₂ S] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[SMulCommClass R R₁ S] [SMulCommClass R R₂ S] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ S] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower' : IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
/-- The quotient map `I → Ω[S⁄R]` with `I` being the kernel of `S ⊗[R] S → S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S →ₗ[S ⊗[R] S] Ω[S⁄R] :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
/-- (Implementation) The underlying linear map of the derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap : S →ₗ[R] Ω[S⁄R] :=
((KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal R S).restrictScalars R).comp
((TensorProduct.includeRight.toLinearMap - TensorProduct.includeLeft.toLinearMap :
S →ₗ[R] S ⊗[R] S).codRestrict
((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars R)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R) :
_ →ₗ[R] _)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
/-- The universal derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.D : Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
{ toLinearMap := KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S
map_one_eq_zero' := by
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply, Ideal.toCotangent_apply]
congr
rw [sub_self]
leibniz' := fun a b => by
have : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul { x // x ∈ ideal R S } (Ω[S⁄R]) S (S ⊗[R] S) := inferInstance
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply]
rw [← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← map_add (ideal R S).toCotangent, Ideal.toCotangent_eq, pow_two]
convert Submodule.mul_mem_mul (KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R a :)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R b :) using 1
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk,
TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_comm b, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower,
smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ring_nf }
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.D R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation :
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = ⊤ := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩ := Ideal.toCotangent_surjective _ x
have : x ∈ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := hx
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal] at this
suffices ∃ hx, (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) by
exact this.choose_spec
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x, ?_⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply R S x⟩
· exact ⟨zero_mem _, Submodule.zero_mem _⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; exact ⟨add_mem hx₁ hy₁, Submodule.add_mem _ hx₂ hy₂⟩
· rintro r x - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact ⟨((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S).smul_mem r hx₁,
Submodule.smul_mem _ r hx₂⟩
/-- `Ω[S⁄R]` is trivial if `R → S` is surjective.
Also see `Algebra.FormallyUnramified.iff_subsingleton_kaehlerDifferential`. -/
lemma KaehlerDifferential.subsingleton_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R S)) :
Subsingleton (Ω[S⁄R]) := by
suffices (⊤ : Submodule S (Ω[S⁄R])) ≤ ⊥ from
(subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).mpr fun y ↦ this trivial
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h x; simp
variable {R S}
/-- The linear map from `Ω[S⁄R]`, associated with a derivation. -/
def Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential (D : Derivation R S M) : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M := by
refine LinearMap.comp ((((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) •
(⊤ : Submodule (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S))).restrictScalars S).liftQ ?_ ?_)
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv S _).symm.toLinearMap
· exact D.tensorProductTo.comp ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).subtype.restrictScalars S)
· intro x hx
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on ((Submodule.restrictScalars_mem _ _ _).mp hx) ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx y -
rw [RingHom.mem_ker] at hx
dsimp
rw [Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul, hx, y.prop, zero_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· intro x y ex ey; rw [map_add, ex, ey, zero_add]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply (D : Derivation R S M) (x) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x) =
D.tensorProductTo x := rfl
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp (D : Derivation R S M) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = D := by
ext a
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.D_apply]
refine (D.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply _).trans ?_
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, map_sub, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul,
one_smul, D.map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp_D (D' : Derivation R S M) (x : S) :
D'.liftKaehlerDifferential (KaehlerDifferential.D R S x) = D' x :=
Derivation.congr_fun D'.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp x
@[ext]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique (f f' : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M)
(hf : f.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = f'.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) :
f = f' := by
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
have : x ∈ Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) := by
rw [KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation]; trivial
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact congr_arg (fun D : Derivation R S M => D x) hf
· rw [map_zero, map_zero]
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
· intro a x _ e; simp [e]
|
variable (R S)
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential = LinearMap.id :=
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential_comp
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Kaehler/Basic.lean | 299 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 889 | 890 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# Affine independence
This file defines affinely independent families of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineIndependent` defines affinely independent families of points
as those where no nontrivial weighted subtraction is `0`. This is
proved equivalent to two other formulations: linear independence of
the results of subtracting a base point in the family from the other
points in the family, or any equal affine combinations having the
same weights. A bundled type `Simplex` is provided for finite
affinely independent families of points, with an abbreviation
`Triangle` for the case of three points.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An indexed family is said to be affinely independent if no
nontrivial weighted subtractions (where the sum of weights is 0) are
0. -/
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
/-- The definition of `AffineIndependent`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A family with at most one point is affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
/-- A family indexed by a `Fintype` is affinely independent if and
only if no nontrivial weighted subtractions over `Finset.univ` (where
the sum of the weights is 0) are 0. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_vadd {p : ι → P} {v : V} :
AffineIndependent k (v +ᵥ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_vadd]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_vadd, AffineIndependent.vadd⟩ := affineIndependent_vadd
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V]
[SMulCommClass G k V] {p : ι → V} {a : G} :
AffineIndependent k (a • p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_smul,
← smul_comm (α := V) a, ← smul_sum, smul_eq_zero_iff_eq]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_smul, AffineIndependent.smul⟩ := affineIndependent_smul
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if the differences
from a base point in that family are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_cancel _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
/-- A set is affinely independent if and only if the differences from
a base point in that set are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
/-- A set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent if and only if,
given a point `p₁`, the vectors added to `p₁` and `p₁` itself are
affinely independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point
have equal `Set.indicator`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s1 s2 : Finset ι) (w1 w2 : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s1, w1 i = 1 →
∑ i ∈ s2, w2 i = 1 →
s1.affineCombination k p w1 = s2.affineCombination k p w2 →
Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 = Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 := by
classical
constructor
· intro ha s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 heq
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s1 ∪ s2
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w1 (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2))] at hw1
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w2 (s1.subset_union_right)] at hw2
have hws : (∑ i ∈ s1 ∪ s2, (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) i) = 0 := by
simp [hw1, hw2]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2)),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p s1.subset_union_right,
← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, Finset.affineCombination_vsub] at heq
exact ha (s1 ∪ s2) (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) hws heq i hi
· rw [← Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_union] at hi
have h₁ : Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_left _ i ↑s1 ↑s2) hi) h
have h₂ : Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_right _ i ↑s2 ↑s1) hi) h
simp [h₁, h₂]
· intro ha s w hw hs i0 hi0
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi0]
simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, const_apply]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i0 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi0 (Function.update_self ..)
fun _ _ hne => Function.update_of_ne hne ..
let w2 := w + w1
have hw2 : ∑ i ∈ s, w2 i = 1 := by
simp_all only [w2, Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, zero_add]
have hw2s : s.affineCombination k p w2 = p i0 := by
simp_all only [w2, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, zero_vadd]
replace ha := ha s s w2 w1 hw2 hw1 (hw1s.symm ▸ hw2s)
have hws : w2 i0 - w1 i0 = 0 := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe] at hi0
rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w2, ← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w1, ha, sub_self]
simpa [w2] using hws
/-- A finite family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point are equal. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ∀ w1 w2 : ι → k, ∑ i, w1 i = 1 → ∑ i, w2 i = 1 →
Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w2 → w1 = w2 := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq]
constructor
· intro h w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
simpa only [Set.indicator_univ, Finset.coe_univ] using h _ _ w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
· intro h s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
have hw1' : (∑ i, (s1 : Set ι).indicator w1 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s1)]
have hw2' : (∑ i, (s2 : Set ι).indicator w2 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s2)]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (Finset.subset_univ s1),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p (Finset.subset_univ s2)] at hweq
exact h _ _ hw1' hw2' hweq
variable {k}
/-- If we single out one member of an affine-independent family of points and affinely transport
all others along the line joining them to this member, the resulting new family of points is affine-
independent.
This is the affine version of `LinearIndependent.units_smul`. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.units_lineMap {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) (j : ι)
(w : ι → Units k) : AffineIndependent k fun i => AffineMap.lineMap (p j) (p i) (w i : k) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k _ j] at hp ⊢
simp only [AffineMap.lineMap_vsub_left, AffineMap.coe_const, AffineMap.lineMap_same, const_apply]
exact hp.units_smul fun i => w i
theorem AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 1) (h : s₁.affineCombination k p w₁ = s₂.affineCombination k p w₂) :
Set.indicator (↑s₁) w₁ = Set.indicator (↑s₂) w₂ :=
(affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq k p).1 ha s₁ s₂ w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ h
/-- An affinely independent family is injective, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.injective [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : Function.Injective p := by
intro i j hij
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ j] at ha
by_contra hij'
refine ha.ne_zero ⟨i, hij'⟩ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.mpr ?_)
simp_all only [ne_eq]
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily given by
composition of an embedding into index type with the original
family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.comp_embedding {ι2 : Type*} (f : ι2 ↪ ι) {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : AffineIndependent k (p ∘ f) := by
classical
intro fs w hw hs i0 hi0
let fs' := fs.map f
let w' i := if h : ∃ i2, f i2 = i then w h.choose else 0
have hw' : ∀ i2 : ι2, w' (f i2) = w i2 := by
intro i2
have h : ∃ i : ι2, f i = f i2 := ⟨i2, rfl⟩
have hs : h.choose = i2 := f.injective h.choose_spec
simp_rw [w', dif_pos h, hs]
have hw's : ∑ i ∈ fs', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← hw, Finset.sum_map]
simp [hw']
have hs' : fs'.weightedVSub p w' = (0 : V) := by
rw [← hs, Finset.weightedVSub_map]
congr with i
simp_all only [comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, exists_eq, dite_true]
rw [← ha fs' w' hw's hs' (f i0) ((Finset.mem_map' _).2 hi0), hw']
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily indexed
by a subtype of the index type. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.subtype {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s : Set ι) :
AffineIndependent k fun i : s => p i :=
ha.comp_embedding (Embedding.subtype _)
/-- If an indexed family of points is affinely independent, so is the
corresponding set of points. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.range {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P) := by
let f : Set.range p → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let fe : Set.range p ↪ ι := ⟨f, fun x₁ x₂ he => Subtype.ext (hf x₁ ▸ hf x₂ ▸ he ▸ rfl)⟩
convert ha.comp_embedding fe
ext
simp [fe, hf]
theorem affineIndependent_equiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') {p : ι' → P} :
AffineIndependent k (p ∘ e) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
refine ⟨?_, AffineIndependent.comp_embedding e.toEmbedding⟩
intro h
have : p = p ∘ e ∘ e.symm.toEmbedding := by
ext
simp
rw [this]
exact h.comp_embedding e.symm.toEmbedding
/-- If a set of points is affinely independent, so is any subset. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mono {s t : Set P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : t → P)) (hs : s ⊆ t) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : s → P) :=
ha.comp_embedding (s.embeddingOfSubset t hs)
/-- If the range of an injective indexed family of points is affinely
independent, so is that family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P)) (hi : Function.Injective p) :
AffineIndependent k p :=
ha.comp_embedding
(⟨fun i => ⟨p i, Set.mem_range_self _⟩, fun _ _ h => hi (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 h)⟩ :
ι ↪ Set.range p)
section Composition
variable {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
/-- If the image of a family of points in affine space under an affine transformation is affine-
independent, then the original family of points is also affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_comp {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hai : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p)) :
AffineIndependent k p := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i]
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub] at hai
exact LinearIndependent.of_comp f.linear hai
/-- The image of a family of points in affine space, under an injective affine transformation, is
affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.map' {p : ι → P} (hai : AffineIndependent k p) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i] at hai
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub]
have hf' : LinearMap.ker f.linear = ⊥ := by rwa [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, f.linear_injective_iff]
exact LinearIndependent.map' hai f.linear hf'
/-- Injective affine maps preserve affine independence. -/
theorem AffineMap.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
⟨AffineIndependent.of_comp f, fun hai => AffineIndependent.map' hai f hf⟩
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of families of points. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k (e ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
e.toAffineMap.affineIndependent_iff e.toEquiv.injective
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of subsets. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_set_of_eq_iff {s : Set P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ↔ AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → P) := by
have : e ∘ ((↑) : s → P) = ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ∘ (e : P ≃ P₂).image s := rfl
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [← e.affineIndependent_iff, this, affineIndependent_equiv]
end Composition
/-- If a family is affinely independent, and the spans of points
indexed by two subsets of the index type have a point in common, those
| subsets of the index type have an element in common, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} {p0 : P} (hp0s1 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s1))
(hp0s2 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s2)) : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ s1 ∩ s2 := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 400 | 404 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# The Pochhammer polynomials
We define and prove some basic relations about
`ascPochhammer S n : S[X] := X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`
which is also known as the rising factorial and about
`descPochhammer R n : R[X] := X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`
which is also known as the falling factorial. Versions of this definition
that are focused on `Nat` can be found in `Data.Nat.Factorial` as `Nat.ascFactorial` and
`Nat.descFactorial`.
## Implementation
As with many other families of polynomials, even though the coefficients are always in `ℕ` or `ℤ` ,
we define the polynomial with coefficients in any `[Semiring S]` or `[Ring R]`.
In an integral domain `S`, we show that `ascPochhammer S n` is zero iff
`n` is a sufficiently large non-positive integer.
## TODO
There is lots more in this direction:
* q-factorials, q-binomials, q-Pochhammer.
-/
universe u v
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
/-- `ascPochhammer S n` is the polynomial `X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`,
with coefficients in the semiring `S`.
-/
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
rw [ascPochhammer]
theorem monic_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial S] [NoZeroDivisors S] :
Monic <| ascPochhammer S n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : leadingCoeff (X + 1 : S[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_add_C 1
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul,
leadingCoeff_comp (ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_add_C 1 : natDegree (X + 1) ≠ 0), hn,
monic_X, one_mul, one_mul, this, one_pow]
section
variable {S} {T : Type v} [Semiring T]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_map (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).map f = ascPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, ascPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval₂ (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) (t : T) :
(ascPochhammer T n).eval t = (ascPochhammer S n).eval₂ f t := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map f]
exact eval_map f t
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) [Algebra R S]
(x : S) : ((ascPochhammer S n).comp (p.map (algebraMap R S))).eval x =
| (ascPochhammer S n).eval (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_eval₂ (algebraMap R S), ← eval₂_comp', ← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap R S),
← map_comp, eval_map]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 90 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jiale Miao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jiale Miao, Kevin Buzzard, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
/-!
# Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization
In this file we introduce Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization.
The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span.
## Main results
- `gramSchmidt` : the Gram-Schmidt process
- `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` :
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors.
- `span_gramSchmidt` :
`gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors.
- `gramSchmidt_ne_zero` :
If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero.
- `gramSchmidt_basis` :
The basis produced by the Gram-Schmidt process when given a basis as input.
- `gramSchmidtNormed` :
the normalized `gramSchmidt` (i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.)
- `gramSchmidt_orthonormal` :
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors.
- `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis`: orthonormal basis constructed by the Gram-Schmidt process from
an indexed set of vectors of the right size
-/
open Finset Submodule Module
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [WellFoundedLT ι]
attribute [local instance] IsWellOrder.toHasWellFounded
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidt [WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
f n - ∑ i : Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt f i).orthogonalProjection (f n)
termination_by n
decreasing_by exact mem_Iio.1 i.2
/-- This lemma uses `∑ i in` instead of `∑ i :`. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_def (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n = f n - ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [← sum_attach, attach_eq_univ, gramSchmidt]
theorem gramSchmidt_def' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, sub_add_cancel]
theorem gramSchmidt_def'' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n,
(⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i, f n⟫ / (‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i := by
convert gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f n
rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton, RCLike.ofReal_pow]
@[simp]
theorem gramSchmidt_zero {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrder ι] [OrderBot ι]
[WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f ⊥ = f ⊥ := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, Iio_eq_Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, sub_zero]
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation**:
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthogonal (f : ι → E) {a b : ι} (h₀ : a ≠ b) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := by
suffices ∀ a b : ι, a < b → ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 by
rcases h₀.lt_or_lt with ha | hb
· exact this _ _ ha
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact this _ _ hb
clear h₀ a b
intro a b h₀
revert a
apply wellFounded_lt.induction b
intro b ih a h₀
simp only [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f b, inner_sub_right, inner_sum, orthogonalProjection_singleton,
inner_smul_right]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem a (Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h₀)]
· by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a = 0
· simp only [h, inner_zero_left, zero_div, zero_mul, sub_zero]
· rw [RCLike.ofReal_pow, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, div_mul_cancel₀, sub_self]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
intro i hi hia
simp only [mul_eq_zero, div_eq_zero_iff, inner_self_eq_zero]
right
rcases hia.lt_or_lt with hia₁ | hia₂
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact ih a h₀ i hia₁
· exact ih i (mem_Iio.1 hi) a hia₂
/-- This is another version of `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` using `Pairwise` instead. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_pairwise_orthogonal (f : ι → E) :
Pairwise fun a b => ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
theorem gramSchmidt_inv_triangular (v : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 v j, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def'' 𝕜 v]
simp only [inner_add_right, inner_sum, inner_smul_right]
set b : ι → E := gramSchmidt 𝕜 v
convert zero_add (0 : 𝕜)
· exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v hij.ne'
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro k hki'
have hki : k < i := by simpa using hki'
have : ⟪b j, b k⟫ = 0 := gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v (hki.trans hij).ne'
simp [this]
open Submodule Set Order
theorem mem_span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hij)
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => smul_mem (span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j)) _ <|
subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) <| (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).le.trans hij)
theorem gramSchmidt_mem_span (f : ι → E) :
∀ {j i}, i ≤ j → gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) := by
intro j i hij
rw [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
refine Submodule.sub_mem _ (subset_span (mem_image_of_mem _ hij))
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_)
let hkj : k < j := (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).trans_le hij
exact smul_mem _ _
(span_mono (image_subset f <| Set.Iic_subset_Iic.2 hkj.le) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ le_rfl)
termination_by j => j
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iic (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iio (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iio c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
/-- `gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors. -/
theorem span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) : span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range f) :=
span_eq_span (range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
theorem gramSchmidt_of_orthogonal {f : ι → E} (hf : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪f i, f j⟫ = 0) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f = f := by
ext i
rw [gramSchmidt_def]
trans f i - 0
· congr
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j hj
rw [Submodule.coe_eq_zero]
suffices span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) ⟂ 𝕜 ∙ f i by
apply orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero
rw [mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
rw [← mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right]
exact this (gramSchmidt_mem_span 𝕜 f (le_refl j))
rw [isOrtho_span]
rintro u ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ v (rfl : v = f i)
apply hf
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt hk (Finset.mem_Iio.mp hj)).ne
· simp
variable {𝕜}
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
have h₁ : f n ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio n) := by
rw [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 f n, gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f, h, zero_add]
apply Submodule.sum_mem _ _
intro a ha
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_Iio, orthogonalProjection_singleton]
apply Submodule.smul_mem _ _ _
rw [Finset.mem_Iio] at ha
exact subset_span ⟨a, ha, by rfl⟩
have h₂ : (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι)) ⟨n, le_refl n⟩ ∈
span 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι) '' Set.Iio ⟨n, le_refl n⟩) := by
rw [image_comp]
simpa using h₁
apply LinearIndependent.not_mem_span_image h₀ _ h₂
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_iff]
/-- If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 :=
gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces a triangular matrix of vectors when given a basis. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_triangular {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i) j = 0 := by
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b '' Set.Iio j) :=
subset_span ((Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨i, hij, rfl⟩)
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (b '' Set.Iio j) := by rwa [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 b j]
have : ↑(b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i)).support ⊆ Set.Iio j :=
Basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span b (Set.Iio j) this
exact (Finsupp.mem_supported' _ _).1 ((Finsupp.mem_supported 𝕜 _).2 this) j Set.not_mem_Iio_self
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces linearly independent vectors when given linearly independent vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_linearIndependent {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
LinearIndependent 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) :=
linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun _ => gramSchmidt_ne_zero _ h₀) fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
/-- When given a basis, `gramSchmidt` produces a basis. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : Basis ι 𝕜 E :=
Basis.mk (gramSchmidt_linearIndependent b.linearIndependent)
((span_gramSchmidt 𝕜 b).trans b.span_eq).ge
theorem coe_gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : (gramSchmidtBasis b : ι → E) = gramSchmidt 𝕜 b :=
Basis.coe_mk _ _
variable (𝕜) in
/-- the normalized `gramSchmidt`
(i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.) -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
(‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹ • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : ‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
simp only [gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe n h₀, gramSchmidtNormed, norm_smul_inv_norm, Ne,
not_false_iff]
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 :=
gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' {f : ι → E} {n : ι} (hn : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n ≠ 0) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
rw [gramSchmidtNormed] at *
rw [norm_smul_inv_norm]
simpa using hn
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` applied to a linearly independent set of vectors produces an orthornormal
system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) := by
unfold Orthonormal
constructor
· simp only [gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length, h₀, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
· intro i j hij
simp only [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, RCLike.conj_inv,
RCLike.conj_ofReal, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
repeat' right
exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors after removing the vectors which
become zero in the process. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal' (f : ι → E) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 fun i : { i | gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0 } => gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i := by
refine ⟨fun i => gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' i.prop, ?_⟩
rintro i j (hij : ¬_)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at hij
simp [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij]
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (s : Set ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f '' s) = span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' s) := by
refine span_eq_span
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi => smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| singleton_subset_set_iff.2 hi) ?_)
simp only [coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i = 0
· simp [h]
· refine mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖, smul_inv_smul₀ ?_ _⟩
exact mod_cast norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed_range (f : ι → E) :
span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) := by
simpa only [image_univ.symm] using span_gramSchmidtNormed f univ
section OrthonormalBasis
variable [Fintype ι] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (h : finrank 𝕜 E = Fintype.card ι) (f : ι → E)
/-- Given an indexed family `f : ι → E` of vectors in an inner product space `E`, for which the
size of the index set is the dimension of `E`, produce an orthonormal basis for `E` which agrees
with the orthonormal set produced by the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process on the elements of
`ι` for which this process gives a nonzero number. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis : OrthonormalBasis ι 𝕜 E :=
((gramSchmidt_orthonormal' f).exists_orthonormalBasis_extension_of_card_eq
(v := gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) h).choose
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply {f : ι → E} {i : ι} (hi : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0) :
gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i = gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i :=
((gramSchmidt_orthonormal' f).exists_orthonormalBasis_extension_of_card_eq
(v := gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) h).choose_spec i hi
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply_of_orthogonal {f : ι → E}
(hf : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪f i, f j⟫ = 0) {i : ι} (hi : f i ≠ 0) :
gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i = (‖f i‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • f i := by
have H : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i = (‖f i‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • f i := by
rw [gramSchmidtNormed, gramSchmidt_of_orthogonal 𝕜 hf]
rw [gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply h, H]
simpa [H] using hi
theorem inner_gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_eq_zero {f : ι → E} {i : ι}
(hi : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i = 0) (j : ι) : ⟪gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i, f j⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right]
suffices span 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) ⟂ 𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i by
apply this
rw [span_gramSchmidtNormed]
exact mem_span_gramSchmidt 𝕜 f le_rfl
rw [isOrtho_span]
rintro u ⟨k, _, rfl⟩ v (rfl : v = _)
by_cases hk : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f k = 0
· rw [hk, inner_zero_left]
rw [← gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply h hk]
have : k ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
exact hk hi
exact (gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f).orthonormal.2 this
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_triangular {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f j, f i⟫ = 0 := by
by_cases hi : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f j = 0
· rw [inner_gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_eq_zero h hi]
· simp [gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply h hi, gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left,
gramSchmidt_inv_triangular 𝕜 f hij]
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_triangular' {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
(gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f).repr (f i) j = 0 := by
simpa [OrthonormalBasis.repr_apply_apply] using gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_triangular h f hij
/-- Given an indexed family `f : ι → E` of vectors in an inner product space `E`, for which the
size of the index set is the dimension of `E`, the matrix of coefficients of `f` with respect to the
orthonormal basis `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis` constructed from `f` is upper-triangular. -/
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_blockTriangular :
((gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f).toBasis.toMatrix f).BlockTriangular id := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_triangular' h f
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_det [DecidableEq ι] :
(gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f).toBasis.det f =
∏ i, ⟪gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i, f i⟫ := by
convert Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular (gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_inv_blockTriangular h f)
exact ((gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f).repr_apply_apply (f _) _).symm
end OrthonormalBasis
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/GramSchmidtOrtho.lean | 372 | 377 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AsSubring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Basic
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `ValuationSubring K`.
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (K : Type u) [Field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`.
This is equivalent to being maximal in the domination order
of local subrings (the stacks project definition). See `LocalSubring.isMax_iff`.
-/
structure ValuationSubring extends Subring K where
mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
instance : SetLike (ValuationSubring K) K where
coe A := A.toSubring
coe_injective' := by
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
replace h := SetLike.coe_injective' h
congr
theorem mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring (x : K) : x ∈ A.toSubring ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[ext]
theorem ext (A B : ValuationSubring K) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := SetLike.ext h
theorem zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.one_mem
theorem add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.toSubring.add_mem
theorem mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.toSubring.mul_mem
theorem neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → -x ∈ A := A.toSubring.neg_mem
theorem mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
instance : SubringClass (ValuationSubring K) K where
zero_mem := zero_mem
add_mem {_} a b := add_mem _ a b
one_mem := one_mem
mul_mem {_} a b := mul_mem _ a b
neg_mem {_} x := neg_mem _ x
theorem toSubring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubring : ValuationSubring K → Subring K) :=
fun x y h => by cases x; cases y; congr
instance : CommRing A :=
show CommRing A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : IsDomain A :=
show IsDomain A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : Top (ValuationSubring K) :=
Top.mk <| { (⊤ : Subring K) with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun _ => Or.inl trivial }
theorem mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : ValuationSubring K) :=
trivial
theorem le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := fun _a _ha => mem_top _
instance : OrderTop (ValuationSubring K) where
top := ⊤
le_top := le_top
instance : Inhabited (ValuationSubring K) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : ValuationRing A where
cond' a b := by
by_cases h : (b : K) = 0
· use 0
left
ext
simp [h]
by_cases h : (a : K) = 0
· use 0; right
ext
simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem (a / b) with hh | hh
· use ⟨a / b, hh⟩
right
ext
field_simp
· rw [show (a / b : K)⁻¹ = b / a by field_simp] at hh
use ⟨b / a, hh⟩
left
ext
field_simp
instance : Algebra A K :=
show Algebra A.toSubring K by infer_instance
-- Porting note: Somehow it cannot find this instance and I'm too lazy to debug. wrong prio?
instance isLocalRing : IsLocalRing A := ValuationRing.isLocalRing A
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (a : A) : algebraMap A K a = a := rfl
instance : IsFractionRing A K where
map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(Units.mk0 (y : K) fun c => nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hy <| Subtype.ext c).isUnit
surj' z := by
by_cases h : z = 0; · use (0, 1); simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh | hh
· use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1); simp
· refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, ?_⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel₀ h⟩
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun c => h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg Subtype.val c))
exists_of_eq {a b} h := ⟨1, by ext; simpa using h⟩
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.ValueGroup A K
-- The `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A) := by
unfold ValueGroup
infer_instance
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : Valuation K A.ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.valuation A K
instance inhabitedValueGroup : Inhabited A.ValueGroup := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
theorem valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
theorem mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h
ha ▸ a.2
theorem valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, fun ha => A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
theorem valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x :=
Quotient.eq''
theorem valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem valuation_surjective : Function.Surjective A.valuation := Quot.mk_surjective
theorem valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 := by
rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff]; use a; simp
theorem valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : IsUnit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨fun h => A.valuation_unit h.unit, fun h => by
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0 := by
intro c
rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h
exact zero_ne_one h
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A := by rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one]
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩; ext; field_simp⟩
theorem valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
theorem valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 := by
rw [IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal]
dsimp [nonunits]; rw [valuation_eq_one_iff]
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm
/-- A subring `R` of `K` such that for all `x : K` either `x ∈ R` or `x⁻¹ ∈ R` is
a valuation subring of `K`. -/
def ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ R with mem_or_inv_mem' := hR }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) (x : K) :
x ∈ ofSubring R hR ↔ x ∈ R :=
Iff.refl _
/-- An overring of a valuation ring is a valuation ring. -/
def ofLE (R : ValuationSubring K) (S : Subring K) (h : R.toSubring ≤ S) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ S with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun x => (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).imp (@h x) (@h _) }
section Order
instance : SemilatticeSup (ValuationSubring K) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (ValuationSubring K)) with
sup := fun R S => ofLE R (R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) <| le_sup_left
le_sup_left := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_left : R.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
le_sup_right := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_right : S.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
sup_le := fun R S T hR hT _ hx => (sup_le hR hT : R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring ≤ T.toSubring) hx }
/-- The ring homomorphism induced by the partial order. -/
def inclusion (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R →+* S :=
Subring.inclusion h
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from a valuation ring to its field of fractions. -/
def subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : R →+* K :=
Subring.subtype R.toSubring
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply {R : ValuationSubring K} (x : R) :
R.subtype x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective (R : ValuationSubring K) :
Function.Injective R.subtype :=
R.toSubring.subtype_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : ⇑(subtype R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
/-- The canonical map on value groups induced by a coarsening of valuation rings. -/
def mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R.ValueGroup →*₀ S.ValueGroup where
toFun := Quotient.map' id fun _ _ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨Units.map (R.inclusion S h).toMonoidHom u, hu⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl
@[mono]
theorem monotone_mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Monotone (R.mapOfLE S h) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩; exact ⟨R.inclusion S h a, ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_comp_valuation (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
R.mapOfLE S h ∘ R.valuation = S.valuation := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_valuation_apply (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) (x : K) :
R.mapOfLE S h (R.valuation x) = S.valuation x := rfl
/-- The ideal corresponding to a coarsening of a valuation ring. -/
def idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Ideal R :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap (R.inclusion S h)
instance prime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : (idealOfLE R S h).IsPrime :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap_isPrime _
/-- The coarsening of a valuation ring associated to a prime ideal. -/
def ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : ValuationSubring K :=
ofLE A (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors).toSubring
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <|
Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
instance ofPrimeAlgebra (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
Algebra A (A.ofPrime P) :=
Subalgebra.algebra (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_scalar_tower (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
letI : SMul A (A.ofPrime P) := SMulZeroClass.toSMul
IsScalarTower A (A.ofPrime P) K :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra' A K K
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_localization (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (A.ofPrime P) P := by
apply
Localization.subalgebra.isLocalization_ofField K P.primeCompl
P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors
theorem le_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : A ≤ ofPrime A P :=
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <| Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
theorem ofPrime_valuation_eq_one_iff_mem_primeCompl (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A)
[P.IsPrime] (x : A) : (ofPrime A P).valuation x = 1 ↔ x ∈ P.primeCompl := by
rw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.isUnit_to_map_iff (A.ofPrime P) P x, valuation_eq_one_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem idealOfLE_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
idealOfLE A (ofPrime A P) (le_ofPrime A P) = P := by
refine Ideal.ext (fun x => ?_)
apply IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff
exact isLocalRing (ofPrime A P)
@[simp]
theorem ofPrime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
ofPrime R (idealOfLE R S h) = S := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, r, hr, rfl⟩; apply mul_mem; · exact h a.2
· rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, ← inv_one, inv_le_inv₀]
· exact not_lt.1 ((not_iff_not.2 <| valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hr)
· simpa [Valuation.pos_iff] using fun hr₀ ↦ hr₀ ▸ hr <| Ideal.zero_mem (R.idealOfLE S h)
· exact zero_lt_one
· intro hx; by_cases hr : x ∈ R; · exact R.le_ofPrime _ hr
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => hr (by rw [h]; exact R.zero_mem)
replace hr := (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).resolve_left hr
refine ⟨1, ⟨x⁻¹, hr⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [Ideal.primeCompl, Submonoid.mem_mk, Subsemigroup.mem_mk, Set.mem_compl_iff,
SetLike.mem_coe, idealOfLE, Ideal.mem_comap, IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, mem_nonunits_iff,
not_not]
change IsUnit (⟨x⁻¹, h hr⟩ : S)
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (⟨x, hx⟩ : S)
ext; field_simp
· field_simp
theorem ofPrime_le_of_le (P Q : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] [Q.IsPrime] (h : P ≤ Q) :
ofPrime A Q ≤ ofPrime A P := fun _x ⟨a, s, hs, he⟩ => ⟨a, s, fun c => hs (h c), he⟩
theorem idealOfLE_le_of_le (R S : ValuationSubring K) (hR : A ≤ R) (hS : A ≤ S) (h : R ≤ S) :
idealOfLE A S hS ≤ idealOfLE A R hR := fun x hx =>
(valuation_lt_one_iff R _).2
(by
by_contra c; push_neg at c; replace c := monotone_mapOfLE R S h c
rw [(mapOfLE _ _ _).map_one, mapOfLE_valuation_apply] at c
apply not_le_of_lt ((valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hx) c)
/-- The equivalence between coarsenings of a valuation ring and its prime ideals. -/
@[simps apply]
def primeSpectrumEquiv : PrimeSpectrum A ≃ {S // A ≤ S} where
toFun P := ⟨ofPrime A P.asIdeal, le_ofPrime _ _⟩
invFun S := ⟨idealOfLE _ S S.2, inferInstance⟩
left_inv P := by ext1; simp
right_inv S := by ext1; simp
/-- An ordered variant of `primeSpectrumEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def primeSpectrumOrderEquiv : (PrimeSpectrum A)ᵒᵈ ≃o {S // A ≤ S} :=
{ OrderDual.ofDual.trans (primeSpectrumEquiv A) with
map_rel_iff' {a b} :=
⟨a.rec <| fun a => b.rec <| fun b => fun h => by
simp only [OrderDual.toDual_le_toDual]
dsimp at h
have := idealOfLE_le_of_le A _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [idealOfLE_ofPrime, idealOfLE_ofPrime] at this
all_goals exact le_ofPrime A (PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal _),
fun h => by apply ofPrime_le_of_le; exact h⟩ }
instance le_total_ideal : IsTotal {S // A ≤ S} LE.le := by
classical
let _ : IsTotal (PrimeSpectrum A) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ => LE.isTotal.total x y⟩
exact ⟨(primeSpectrumOrderEquiv A).symm.toRelEmbedding.isTotal.total⟩
open scoped Classical in
instance linearOrderOverring : LinearOrder {S // A ≤ S} where
le_total := (le_total_ideal A).1
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ sup_eq_maxDefault a b
toDecidableLE := _
end Order
end ValuationSubring
namespace Valuation
variable {K}
variable {Γ Γ₁ Γ₂ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ]
[LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₁] [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₂] (v : Valuation K Γ)
(v₁ : Valuation K Γ₁) (v₂ : Valuation K Γ₂)
/-- The valuation subring associated to a valuation. -/
def valuationSubring : ValuationSubring K :=
{ v.integer with
mem_or_inv_mem' := by
intro x
rcases val_le_one_or_val_inv_le_one v x with h | h
exacts [Or.inl h, Or.inr h] }
@[simp]
theorem mem_valuationSubring_iff (x : K) : x ∈ v.valuationSubring ↔ v x ≤ 1 := Iff.refl _
theorem isEquiv_iff_valuationSubring :
v₁.IsEquiv v₂ ↔ v₁.valuationSubring = v₂.valuationSubring := by
constructor
· intro h; ext x; specialize h x 1; simpa using h
· intro h; apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
intro x
have : x ∈ v₁.valuationSubring ↔ x ∈ v₂.valuationSubring := by rw [h]
simpa using this
theorem isEquiv_valuation_valuationSubring : v.IsEquiv v.valuationSubring.valuation := by
rw [isEquiv_iff_val_le_one]
intro x
rw [ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one_iff]
rfl
end Valuation
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
@[simp]
theorem valuationSubring_valuation : A.valuation.valuationSubring = A := by
ext; rw [← A.valuation_le_one_iff]; rfl
section UnitGroup
/-- The unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def unitGroup : Subgroup Kˣ :=
(A.valuation.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.comp (Units.coeHom K)).ker
@[simp]
theorem mem_unitGroup_iff (x : Kˣ) : x ∈ A.unitGroup ↔ A.valuation x = 1 := Iff.rfl
/-- For a valuation subring `A`, `A.unitGroup` agrees with the units of `A`. -/
def unitGroupMulEquiv : A.unitGroup ≃* Aˣ where
toFun x :=
{ val := ⟨(x : Kˣ), mem_of_valuation_le_one A _ x.prop.le⟩
inv := ⟨((x⁻¹ : A.unitGroup) : Kˣ), mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _ x⁻¹.prop.le⟩
-- Porting note: was `Units.mul_inv x`
val_inv := Subtype.ext (by simp)
-- Porting note: was `Units.inv_mul x`
inv_val := Subtype.ext (by simp) }
invFun x := ⟨Units.map A.subtype.toMonoidHom x, A.valuation_unit x⟩
left_inv a := by ext; rfl
right_inv a := by ext; rfl
map_mul' a b := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitGroupMulEquiv_apply (a : A.unitGroup) :
((A.unitGroupMulEquiv a : A) : K) = ((a : Kˣ) : K) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitGroupMulEquiv_symm_apply (a : Aˣ) : ((A.unitGroupMulEquiv.symm a : Kˣ) : K) = a :=
rfl
theorem unitGroup_le_unitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A.unitGroup ≤ B.unitGroup ↔ A ≤ B := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rw [← A.valuation_le_one_iff x, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hx
by_cases h_1 : x = 0; · simp only [h_1, zero_mem]
by_cases h_2 : 1 + x = 0
· simp only [← add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq.1 h_2, neg_mem _ _ (one_mem _)]
rcases hx with hx | hx
· have := h (show Units.mk0 _ h_2 ∈ A.unitGroup from A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt hx)
simpa using
B.add_mem _ _ (show 1 + x ∈ B from SetLike.coe_mem (B.unitGroupMulEquiv ⟨_, this⟩ : B))
(B.neg_mem _ B.one_mem)
· have := h (show Units.mk0 x h_1 ∈ A.unitGroup from hx)
exact SetLike.coe_mem (B.unitGroupMulEquiv ⟨_, this⟩ : B)
· rintro h x (hx : A.valuation x = 1)
apply_fun A.mapOfLE B h at hx
simpa using hx
theorem unitGroup_injective : Function.Injective (unitGroup : ValuationSubring K → Subgroup _) :=
fun A B h => by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, unitGroup_le_unitGroup] using h
theorem eq_iff_unitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A = B ↔ A.unitGroup = B.unitGroup :=
unitGroup_injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their unit groups is an order embedding. -/
def unitGroupOrderEmbedding : ValuationSubring K ↪o Subgroup Kˣ where
toFun A := A.unitGroup
inj' := unitGroup_injective
map_rel_iff' {_A _B} := unitGroup_le_unitGroup
theorem unitGroup_strictMono : StrictMono (unitGroup : ValuationSubring K → Subgroup _) :=
unitGroupOrderEmbedding.strictMono
end UnitGroup
section nonunits
/-- The nonunits of a valuation subring of `K`, as a subsemigroup of `K` -/
def nonunits : Subsemigroup K where
carrier := {x | A.valuation x < 1}
-- Porting note: added `Set.mem_setOf.mp`
mul_mem' ha hb := (mul_lt_mul'' (Set.mem_setOf.mp ha) (Set.mem_setOf.mp hb)
zero_le' zero_le').trans_eq <| mul_one _
theorem mem_nonunits_iff {x : K} : x ∈ A.nonunits ↔ A.valuation x < 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonunits_le_nonunits {A B : ValuationSubring K} : B.nonunits ≤ A.nonunits ↔ A ≤ B := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
by_cases h_1 : x = 0; · simp only [h_1, zero_mem]
rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, ← not_lt, Valuation.one_lt_val_iff _ h_1] at hx ⊢
by_contra h_2; exact hx (h h_2)
· intro h x hx
by_contra h_1; exact not_lt.2 (monotone_mapOfLE _ _ h (not_lt.1 h_1)) hx
theorem nonunits_injective : Function.Injective (nonunits : ValuationSubring K → Subsemigroup _) :=
fun A B h => by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, nonunits_le_nonunits] using h.symm
theorem nonunits_inj {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A.nonunits = B.nonunits ↔ A = B :=
nonunits_injective.eq_iff
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their nonunits is a dual order embedding. -/
def nonunitsOrderEmbedding : ValuationSubring K ↪o (Subsemigroup K)ᵒᵈ where
toFun A := A.nonunits
inj' := nonunits_injective
map_rel_iff' {_A _B} := nonunits_le_nonunits
variable {A}
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A` after coercion to `K`.
See also `mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal`, which gets rid of the coercion to `K`,
at the expense of a more complicated right hand side.
-/
theorem coe_mem_nonunits_iff {a : A} : (a : K) ∈ A.nonunits ↔ a ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A :=
(valuation_lt_one_iff _ _).symm
theorem nonunits_le : A.nonunits ≤ A.toSubring.toSubmonoid.toSubsemigroup := fun _a ha =>
(A.valuation_le_one_iff _).mp (A.mem_nonunits_iff.mp ha).le
theorem nonunits_subset : (A.nonunits : Set K) ⊆ A :=
nonunits_le
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A`.
See also `coe_mem_nonunits_iff`, which has a simpler right hand side but requires the element
to be in `A` already.
-/
theorem mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal {a : K} :
a ∈ A.nonunits ↔ ∃ ha, (⟨a, ha⟩ : A) ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A :=
⟨fun h => ⟨nonunits_subset h, coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mp h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ =>
coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mpr h⟩
/-- `A.nonunits` agrees with the maximal ideal of `A`, after taking its image in `K`. -/
theorem image_maximalIdeal : ((↑) : A → K) '' IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A = A.nonunits := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal]
rw [Subtype.exists]
simp_rw [exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
end nonunits
section PrincipalUnitGroup
/-- The principal unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def principalUnitGroup : Subgroup Kˣ where
carrier := {x | A.valuation (x - 1) < 1}
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb
-- Porting note: added
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at ha hb
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (max_lt hb ha)
-- Porting note: `sub_add_sub_cancel` needed some help
rw [← one_mul (A.valuation (b - 1)), ← A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt ha, add_sub_cancel,
← Valuation.map_mul, mul_sub_one, ← sub_add_sub_cancel (↑(a * b) : K) _ 1]
exact A.valuation.map_add _ _
one_mem' := by simp
inv_mem' := by
dsimp
intro a ha
conv =>
lhs
rw [← mul_one (A.valuation _), ← A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt ha]
rwa [add_sub_cancel, ← Valuation.map_mul, sub_mul, Units.inv_mul, ← neg_sub, one_mul,
Valuation.map_neg]
theorem principal_units_le_units : A.principalUnitGroup ≤ A.unitGroup := fun a h => by
simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt h
theorem mem_principalUnitGroup_iff (x : Kˣ) :
x ∈ A.principalUnitGroup ↔ A.valuation ((x : K) - 1) < 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem principalUnitGroup_le_principalUnitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} :
B.principalUnitGroup ≤ A.principalUnitGroup ↔ A ≤ B := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
by_cases h_1 : x = 0; · simp only [h_1, zero_mem]
by_cases h_2 : x⁻¹ + 1 = 0
· rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_neg, inv_one] at h_2
simpa only [h_2] using B.neg_mem _ B.one_mem
· rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, ← not_lt, Valuation.one_lt_val_iff _ h_1,
← add_sub_cancel_right x⁻¹, ← Units.val_mk0 h_2, ← mem_principalUnitGroup_iff] at hx ⊢
simpa only [hx] using @h (Units.mk0 (x⁻¹ + 1) h_2)
· intro h x hx
by_contra h_1; exact not_lt.2 (monotone_mapOfLE _ _ h (not_lt.1 h_1)) hx
theorem principalUnitGroup_injective :
Function.Injective (principalUnitGroup : ValuationSubring K → Subgroup _) := fun A B h => by
simpa [le_antisymm_iff, principalUnitGroup_le_principalUnitGroup] using h.symm
theorem eq_iff_principalUnitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} :
A = B ↔ A.principalUnitGroup = B.principalUnitGroup :=
principalUnitGroup_injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their principal unit groups is an order embedding. -/
def principalUnitGroupOrderEmbedding : ValuationSubring K ↪o (Subgroup Kˣ)ᵒᵈ where
toFun A := A.principalUnitGroup
inj' := principalUnitGroup_injective
map_rel_iff' {_A _B} := principalUnitGroup_le_principalUnitGroup
theorem coe_mem_principalUnitGroup_iff {x : A.unitGroup} :
(x : Kˣ) ∈ A.principalUnitGroup ↔
A.unitGroupMulEquiv x ∈ (Units.map (IsLocalRing.residue A).toMonoidHom).ker := by
rw [MonoidHom.mem_ker, Units.ext_iff]
let π := Ideal.Quotient.mk (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A); convert_to _ ↔ π _ = 1
rw [← π.map_one, ← sub_eq_zero, ← π.map_sub, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, valuation_lt_one_iff]
simp [mem_principalUnitGroup_iff]
/-- The principal unit group agrees with the kernel of the canonical map from
the units of `A` to the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def principalUnitGroupEquiv :
A.principalUnitGroup ≃* (Units.map (IsLocalRing.residue A).toMonoidHom).ker where
toFun x :=
⟨A.unitGroupMulEquiv ⟨_, A.principal_units_le_units x.2⟩,
A.coe_mem_principalUnitGroup_iff.1 x.2⟩
invFun x :=
⟨A.unitGroupMulEquiv.symm x, by
rw [A.coe_mem_principalUnitGroup_iff]; simp⟩
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
theorem principalUnitGroupEquiv_apply (a : A.principalUnitGroup) :
(((principalUnitGroupEquiv A a : Aˣ) : A) : K) = (a : Kˣ) :=
rfl
theorem principalUnitGroup_symm_apply (a : (Units.map (IsLocalRing.residue A).toMonoidHom).ker) :
((A.principalUnitGroupEquiv.symm a : Kˣ) : K) = ((a : Aˣ) : A) :=
rfl
/-- The canonical map from the unit group of `A` to the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits : A.unitGroup →* (IsLocalRing.ResidueField A)ˣ :=
MonoidHom.comp (Units.map <| (Ideal.Quotient.mk _).toMonoidHom) A.unitGroupMulEquiv.toMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits_apply (x : A.unitGroup) :
(A.unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits x : IsLocalRing.ResidueField A) =
Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (A.unitGroupMulEquiv x : A) :=
rfl
theorem ker_unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits :
A.unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits.ker = A.principalUnitGroup.comap A.unitGroup.subtype := by
ext
simp_rw [Subgroup.mem_comap, Subgroup.coe_subtype, coe_mem_principalUnitGroup_iff,
unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits, IsLocalRing.residue, RingHom.toMonoidHom_eq_coe,
MulEquiv.toMonoidHom_eq_coe, MonoidHom.mem_ker, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MonoidHom.coe_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem surjective_unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits :
Function.Surjective A.unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits :=
(IsLocalRing.surjective_units_map_of_local_ringHom _ Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
IsLocalRing.isLocalHom_residue).comp
(MulEquiv.surjective _)
/-- The quotient of the unit group of `A` by the principal unit group of `A` agrees with
the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def unitsModPrincipalUnitsEquivResidueFieldUnits :
A.unitGroup ⧸ A.principalUnitGroup.comap A.unitGroup.subtype ≃* (IsLocalRing.ResidueField A)ˣ :=
(QuotientGroup.quotientMulEquivOfEq A.ker_unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits.symm).trans
(QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective _ A.surjective_unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits)
/-- Porting note: Lean needs to be reminded of this instance -/
local instance : MulOneClass ({ x // x ∈ unitGroup A } ⧸
Subgroup.comap (Subgroup.subtype (unitGroup A)) (principalUnitGroup A)) := inferInstance
theorem unitsModPrincipalUnitsEquivResidueFieldUnits_comp_quotientGroup_mk :
(A.unitsModPrincipalUnitsEquivResidueFieldUnits : _ ⧸ Subgroup.comap _ _ →* _).comp
(QuotientGroup.mk' (A.principalUnitGroup.subgroupOf A.unitGroup)) =
A.unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits := rfl
theorem unitsModPrincipalUnitsEquivResidueFieldUnits_comp_quotientGroup_mk_apply
(x : A.unitGroup) :
A.unitsModPrincipalUnitsEquivResidueFieldUnits.toMonoidHom (QuotientGroup.mk x) =
A.unitGroupToResidueFieldUnits x := rfl
end PrincipalUnitGroup
/-! ### Pointwise actions
|
This transfers the action from `Subring.pointwiseMulAction`, noting that it only applies when
the action is by a group. Notably this provides an instances when `G` is `K ≃+* K`.
These instances are in the `Pointwise` locale.
The lemmas in this section are copied from the file `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise`; try
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationSubring.lean | 687 | 693 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# Measurability of the integral against a kernel
The Bochner integral of a strongly measurable function against a kernel is strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right`: the function
`a ↦ ∫ b, f a b ∂(κ a)` is measurable, for an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function
`f : α → β → E` such that `uncurry f` is measurable.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Function Set Filter
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{κ : Kernel α β} {η : Kernel β γ} {a : α} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_integrable ⦃f : β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | Integrable f (κ a)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt hf.enorm.lintegral_kernel measurable_const
variable [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : Kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_kernel_integrable ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) :
MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right hf.enorm) measurable_const
open ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
omit [IsSFiniteKernel κ] in
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel ⦃f : β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
have : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc β E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let f' n : α → E := {x | Integrable f (κ x)}.indicator fun x ↦ (s n).integral (κ x)
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (f := f') atTop (fun n ↦ ?_) ?_
· refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
exact κ.measurable_coe ((s n).measurableSet_fiber _)
· rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable f (κ x)
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hfx, indicator_of_mem, f']
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset _ hfx
exact subset_rfl
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prodMk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n =>
{x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral (κ x)
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_kernel_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply Kernel.measurable_kernel_prodMk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂κ x) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) (κ x)
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) (κ x) := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was
-- exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
-- SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le hf.measurable (by simp) (x, y) n
· refine Eventually.of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf.measurable (by simp) ?_
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂κ x := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf
exact hf.integral_kernel_prod_right
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right'' {f : β × γ → E}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun x => ∫ y, (fun u : (α × β) × γ => f (u.1.2, u.2)) (x, y) ∂η x) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.snd.prodMk measurable_snd))
simpa using this
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left ⦃f : β → α → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' ⦃f : β × α → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left'' {f : γ × β → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂η (a, y) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun y => ∫ x, (fun u : γ × α × β => f (u.1, u.2.2)) (x, y) ∂η y) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_snd.snd))
simpa using this
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/MeasurableIntegral.lean | 224 | 227 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
| theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 104 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,039 | 2,041 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Intervals without endpoints ordering
In any lattice `α`, we define `uIcc a b` to be `Icc (a ⊓ b) (a ⊔ b)`, which in a linear order is
the set of elements lying between `a` and `b`.
`Icc a b` requires the assumption `a ≤ b` to be meaningful, which is sometimes inconvenient. The
interval as defined in this file is always the set of things lying between `a` and `b`, regardless
of the relative order of `a` and `b`.
For real numbers, `uIcc a b` is the same as `segment ℝ a b`.
In a product or pi type, `uIcc a b` is the smallest box containing `a` and `b`. For example,
`uIcc (1, -1) (-1, 1) = Icc (-1, -1) (1, 1)` is the square of vertices `(1, -1)`, `(-1, -1)`,
`(-1, 1)`, `(1, 1)`.
In `Finset α` (seen as a hypercube of dimension `Fintype.card α`), `uIcc a b` is the smallest
subcube containing both `a` and `b`.
## Notation
We use the localized notation `[[a, b]]` for `uIcc a b`. One can open the locale `Interval` to
make the notation available.
-/
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ x : α}
/-- `uIcc a b` is the set of elements lying between `a` and `b`, with `a` and `b` included.
Note that we define it more generally in a lattice as `Set.Icc (a ⊓ b) (a ⊔ b)`. In a product type,
`uIcc` corresponds to the bounding box of the two elements. -/
def uIcc (a b : α) : Set α := Icc (a ⊓ b) (a ⊔ b)
/-- `[[a, b]]` denotes the set of elements lying between `a` and `b`, inclusive. -/
scoped[Interval] notation "[[" a ", " b "]]" => Set.uIcc a b
open Interval
@[simp]
lemma uIcc_toDual (a b : α) : [[toDual a, toDual b]] = ofDual ⁻¹' [[a, b]] :=
-- Note: needed to hint `(α := α)` after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 (elaboration order?)
Icc_toDual (α := α)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_uIcc := uIcc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_ofDual (a b : αᵒᵈ) : [[ofDual a, ofDual b]] = toDual ⁻¹' [[a, b]] :=
Icc_ofDual
@[simp]
lemma uIcc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := by rw [uIcc, inf_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
lemma uIcc_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a := by rw [uIcc, inf_eq_right.2 h, sup_eq_left.2 h]
lemma uIcc_comm (a b : α) : [[a, b]] = [[b, a]] := by simp_rw [uIcc, inf_comm, sup_comm]
lemma uIcc_of_lt (h : a < b) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := uIcc_of_le h.le
lemma uIcc_of_gt (h : b < a) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a := uIcc_of_ge h.le
lemma uIcc_self : [[a, a]] = {a} := by simp [uIcc]
@[simp] lemma nonempty_uIcc : [[a, b]].Nonempty := nonempty_Icc.2 inf_le_sup
lemma Icc_subset_uIcc : Icc a b ⊆ [[a, b]] := Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_left le_sup_right
lemma Icc_subset_uIcc' : Icc b a ⊆ [[a, b]] := Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_right le_sup_left
@[simp] lemma left_mem_uIcc : a ∈ [[a, b]] := ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩
@[simp] lemma right_mem_uIcc : b ∈ [[a, b]] := ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩
lemma mem_uIcc_of_le (ha : a ≤ x) (hb : x ≤ b) : x ∈ [[a, b]] := Icc_subset_uIcc ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma mem_uIcc_of_ge (hb : b ≤ x) (ha : x ≤ a) : x ∈ [[a, b]] := Icc_subset_uIcc' ⟨hb, ha⟩
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc (h₁ : a₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) (h₂ : b₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] :=
Icc_subset_Icc (le_inf h₁.1 h₂.1) (sup_le h₁.2 h₂.2)
lemma uIcc_subset_Icc (ha : a₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) (hb : b₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc (le_inf ha.1 hb.1) (sup_le ha.2 hb.2)
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_mem :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ a₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]] ∧ b₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]] :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h left_mem_uIcc, h right_mem_uIcc⟩) fun h =>
uIcc_subset_uIcc h.1 h.2
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le' :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ a₂ ⊓ b₂ ≤ a₁ ⊓ b₁ ∧ a₁ ⊔ b₁ ≤ a₂ ⊔ b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc_iff inf_le_sup
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_right (h : x ∈ [[a, b]]) : [[x, b]] ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc h right_mem_uIcc
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_left (h : x ∈ [[a, b]]) : [[a, x]] ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc left_mem_uIcc h
lemma bdd_below_bdd_above_iff_subset_uIcc (s : Set α) :
BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc.trans
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => ⟨a, b, fun _ hx => Icc_subset_uIcc (h hx)⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => ⟨_, _, h⟩⟩
section Prod
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_prod_uIcc (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
[[a₁, a₂]] ×ˢ [[b₁, b₂]] = [[(a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂)]] :=
Icc_prod_Icc _ _ _ _
theorem uIcc_prod_eq (a b : α × β) : [[a, b]] = [[a.1, b.1]] ×ˢ [[a.2, b.2]] := by simp
end Prod
end Lattice
open Interval
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] {a b c : α}
lemma eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc (ha : a ∈ [[b, c]]) (hb : b ∈ [[a, c]]) : a = b :=
eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (inf_congr_right ha.1 hb.1) <| sup_congr_right ha.2 hb.2
lemma eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc' : b ∈ [[a, c]] → c ∈ [[a, b]] → b = c := by
simpa only [uIcc_comm a] using eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc
lemma uIcc_injective_right (a : α) : Injective fun b => uIcc b a := fun b c h => by
rw [Set.ext_iff] at h
exact eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc ((h _).1 left_mem_uIcc) ((h _).2 left_mem_uIcc)
lemma uIcc_injective_left (a : α) : Injective (uIcc a) := by
simpa only [uIcc_comm] using uIcc_injective_right a
end DistribLattice
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section Lattice
variable [Lattice β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
lemma _root_.MonotoneOn.mapsTo_uIcc (hf : MonotoneOn f (uIcc a b)) :
MapsTo f (uIcc a b) (uIcc (f a) (f b)) := by
rw [uIcc, uIcc, ← hf.map_sup, ← hf.map_inf] <;>
apply_rules [left_mem_uIcc, right_mem_uIcc, hf.mapsTo_Icc]
lemma _root_.AntitoneOn.mapsTo_uIcc (hf : AntitoneOn f (uIcc a b)) :
MapsTo f (uIcc a b) (uIcc (f a) (f b)) := by
rw [uIcc, uIcc, ← hf.map_sup, ← hf.map_inf] <;>
apply_rules [left_mem_uIcc, right_mem_uIcc, hf.mapsTo_Icc]
lemma _root_.Monotone.mapsTo_uIcc (hf : Monotone f) : MapsTo f (uIcc a b) (uIcc (f a) (f b)) :=
(hf.monotoneOn _).mapsTo_uIcc
lemma _root_.Antitone.mapsTo_uIcc (hf : Antitone f) : MapsTo f (uIcc a b) (uIcc (f a) (f b)) :=
(hf.antitoneOn _).mapsTo_uIcc
lemma _root_.MonotoneOn.image_uIcc_subset (hf : MonotoneOn f (uIcc a b)) :
f '' uIcc a b ⊆ uIcc (f a) (f b) := hf.mapsTo_uIcc.image_subset
lemma _root_.AntitoneOn.image_uIcc_subset (hf : AntitoneOn f (uIcc a b)) :
f '' uIcc a b ⊆ uIcc (f a) (f b) := hf.mapsTo_uIcc.image_subset
lemma _root_.Monotone.image_uIcc_subset (hf : Monotone f) : f '' uIcc a b ⊆ uIcc (f a) (f b) :=
(hf.monotoneOn _).image_uIcc_subset
lemma _root_.Antitone.image_uIcc_subset (hf : Antitone f) : f '' uIcc a b ⊆ uIcc (f a) (f b) :=
(hf.antitoneOn _).image_uIcc_subset
end Lattice
variable [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α}
theorem Icc_min_max : Icc (min a b) (max a b) = [[a, b]] :=
rfl
lemma uIcc_of_not_le (h : ¬a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a := uIcc_of_gt <| lt_of_not_ge h
lemma uIcc_of_not_ge (h : ¬b ≤ a) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := uIcc_of_lt <| lt_of_not_ge h
lemma uIcc_eq_union : [[a, b]] = Icc a b ∪ Icc b a := by rw [Icc_union_Icc', max_comm] <;> rfl
lemma mem_uIcc : a ∈ [[b, c]] ↔ b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ c ∨ c ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b := by simp [uIcc_eq_union]
lemma not_mem_uIcc_of_lt (ha : c < a) (hb : c < b) : c ∉ [[a, b]] :=
not_mem_Icc_of_lt <| lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma not_mem_uIcc_of_gt (ha : a < c) (hb : b < c) : c ∉ [[a, b]] :=
not_mem_Icc_of_gt <| max_lt_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ min a₁ b₁ ∧ max a₁ b₁ ≤ max a₂ b₂ :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le'
/-- A sort of triangle inequality. -/
lemma uIcc_subset_uIcc_union_uIcc : [[a, c]] ⊆ [[a, b]] ∪ [[b, c]] := fun x => by
simp only [mem_uIcc, mem_union]
rcases le_total x b with h2 | h2 <;> tauto
lemma monotone_or_antitone_iff_uIcc :
Monotone f ∨ Antitone f ↔ ∀ a b c, c ∈ [[a, b]] → f c ∈ [[f a, f b]] := by
constructor
· rintro (hf | hf) a b c <;> simp_rw [← Icc_min_max, ← hf.map_min, ← hf.map_max]
exacts [fun hc => ⟨hf hc.1, hf hc.2⟩, fun hc => ⟨hf hc.2, hf hc.1⟩]
contrapose!
rw [not_monotone_not_antitone_iff_exists_le_le]
rintro ⟨a, b, c, hab, hbc, ⟨hfab, hfcb⟩ | ⟨hfba, hfbc⟩⟩
· exact ⟨a, c, b, Icc_subset_uIcc ⟨hab, hbc⟩, fun h => h.2.not_lt <| max_lt hfab hfcb⟩
· exact ⟨a, c, b, Icc_subset_uIcc ⟨hab, hbc⟩, fun h => h.1.not_lt <| lt_min hfba hfbc⟩
lemma monotoneOn_or_antitoneOn_iff_uIcc :
MonotoneOn f s ∨ AntitoneOn f s ↔
∀ᵉ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s) (c ∈ s), c ∈ [[a, b]] → f c ∈ [[f a, f b]] := by
simp [monotoneOn_iff_monotone, antitoneOn_iff_antitone, monotone_or_antitone_iff_uIcc,
mem_uIcc]
/-- The open-closed uIcc with unordered bounds. -/
def uIoc : α → α → Set α := fun a b => Ioc (min a b) (max a b)
-- Below is a capital iota
/-- `Ι a b` denotes the open-closed interval with unordered bounds. Here, `Ι` is a capital iota,
distinguished from a capital `i`. -/
scoped[Interval] notation "Ι" => Set.uIoc
open scoped Interval
@[simp] lemma uIoc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Ι a b = Ioc a b := by simp [uIoc, h]
@[simp] lemma uIoc_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : Ι a b = Ioc b a := by simp [uIoc, h]
lemma uIoc_eq_union : Ι a b = Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a := by
cases le_total a b <;> simp [uIoc, *]
lemma mem_uIoc : a ∈ Ι b c ↔ b < a ∧ a ≤ c ∨ c < a ∧ a ≤ b := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, mem_Ioc, mem_Ioc]
lemma not_mem_uIoc : a ∉ Ι b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c ∨ c < a ∧ b < a := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, mem_Ioc, not_lt, ← not_le]
tauto
@[simp] lemma left_mem_uIoc : a ∈ Ι a b ↔ b < a := by simp [mem_uIoc]
@[simp] lemma right_mem_uIoc : b ∈ Ι a b ↔ a < b := by simp [mem_uIoc]
lemma forall_uIoc_iff {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ Ι a b, P x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ Ioc a b, P x) ∧ ∀ x ∈ Ioc b a, P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
lemma uIoc_subset_uIoc_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc {a b c d : α}
(h : [[a, b]] ⊆ [[c, d]]) : Ι a b ⊆ Ι c d :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc (uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le.1 h).1 (uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le.1 h).2
lemma uIoc_comm (a b : α) : Ι a b = Ι b a := by simp only [uIoc, min_comm a b, max_comm a b]
lemma Ioc_subset_uIoc : Ioc a b ⊆ Ι a b := Ioc_subset_Ioc (min_le_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
lemma Ioc_subset_uIoc' : Ioc a b ⊆ Ι b a := Ioc_subset_Ioc (min_le_right _ _) (le_max_left _ _)
lemma uIoc_subset_uIcc : Ι a b ⊆ uIcc a b := Ioc_subset_Icc_self
lemma eq_of_mem_uIoc_of_mem_uIoc : a ∈ Ι b c → b ∈ Ι a c → a = b := by
simp_rw [mem_uIoc]; rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> apply le_antisymm <;>
first |assumption|exact le_of_lt ‹_›|exact le_trans ‹_› (le_of_lt ‹_›)
lemma eq_of_mem_uIoc_of_mem_uIoc' : b ∈ Ι a c → c ∈ Ι a b → b = c := by
simpa only [uIoc_comm a] using eq_of_mem_uIoc_of_mem_uIoc
lemma eq_of_not_mem_uIoc_of_not_mem_uIoc (ha : a ≤ c) (hb : b ≤ c) :
| a ∉ Ι b c → b ∉ Ι a c → a = b := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/UnorderedInterval.lean | 288 | 288 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Probability measures
This file defines the type of probability measures on a given measurable space. When the underlying
space has a topology and the measurable space structure (sigma algebra) is finer than the Borel
sigma algebra, then the type of probability measures is equipped with the topology of convergence
in distribution (weak convergence of measures). The topology of convergence in distribution is the
coarsest topology w.r.t. which for every bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued random variable `X`, the
expected value of `X` depends continuously on the choice of probability measure. This is a special
case of the topology of weak convergence of finite measures.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are
* the type `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω` with the topology of convergence in
distribution (a.k.a. convergence in law, weak convergence of measures);
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toFiniteMeasure`: Interpret a probability measure as
a finite measure;
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.normalize`: Normalize a finite measure to a probability measure
(returns junk for the zero measure).
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.map`: The push-forward `f* μ` of a probability measure
`μ` on `Ω` along a measurable function `f : Ω → Ω'`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto`: Convergence of
probability measures is characterized by the convergence of expected values of all bounded
continuous random variables. This shows that the chosen definition of topology coincides with
the common textbook definition of convergence in distribution, i.e., weak convergence of
measures. A similar characterization by the convergence of expected values (in the
`MeasureTheory.lintegral` sense) of all bounded continuous nonnegative random variables is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`: The convergence of finite
measures to a nonzero limit is characterized by the convergence of the probability-normalized
versions and of the total masses.
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.continuous_map`: For a continuous function `f : Ω → Ω'`, the
push-forward of probability measures `f* : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → ProbabilityMeasure Ω'` is
continuous.
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.t2Space`: The topology of convergence in distribution is
Hausdorff on Borel spaces where indicators of closed sets have continuous decreasing
approximating sequences (in particular on any pseudo-metrizable spaces).
TODO:
* Probability measures form a convex space.
## Implementation notes
The topology of convergence in distribution on `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω` is inherited
weak convergence of finite measures via the mapping
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toFiniteMeasure`.
Like `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`, the implementation of `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω`
is directly as a subtype of `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`, and the coercion to a function is the
composition `ENNReal.toNNReal` and the coercion to function of `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
convergence in distribution, convergence in law, weak convergence of measures, probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section ProbabilityMeasure
/-! ### Probability measures
In this section we define the type of probability measures on a measurable space `Ω`, denoted by
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω`.
If `Ω` is moreover a topological space and the sigma algebra on `Ω` is finer than the Borel sigma
algebra (i.e. `[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]`), then `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω` is
equipped with the topology of weak convergence of measures. Since every probability measure is a
finite measure, this is implemented as the induced topology from the mapping
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toFiniteMeasure`.
-/
/-- Probability measures are defined as the subtype of measures that have the property of being
probability measures (i.e., their total mass is one). -/
def ProbabilityMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsProbabilityMeasure μ }
namespace ProbabilityMeasure
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
instance [Inhabited Ω] : Inhabited (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :=
⟨⟨Measure.dirac default, Measure.dirac.isProbabilityMeasure⟩⟩
/-- Coercion from `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω` to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. -/
@[coe]
def toMeasure : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
/-- A probability measure can be interpreted as a measure. -/
instance : Coe (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) := { coe := toMeasure }
instance (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : IsProbabilityMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) :=
μ.prop
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) : toMeasure ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_to_measure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective <| Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ProbabilityMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ProbabilityMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_univ (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν univ = 1 :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal ν.prop.measure_univ
theorem coeFn_univ_ne_zero (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν univ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [coeFn_univ, Ne, one_ne_zero, not_false_iff]
/-- A probability measure can be interpreted as a finite measure. -/
def toFiniteMeasure (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω := ⟨μ, inferInstance⟩
@[simp] lemma coeFn_toFiniteMeasure (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ⇑μ.toFiniteMeasure = μ := rfl
lemma toFiniteMeasure_apply (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
μ.toFiniteMeasure s = μ s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_toMeasure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
(ν.toFiniteMeasure : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
(ν.toFiniteMeasure : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFiniteMeasure_apply_eq_apply (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
ν.toFiniteMeasure s = ν s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s := by
rw [← coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn, FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
toMeasure_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_toMeasure]
@[simp]
theorem null_iff_toMeasure_null (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
ν s = 0 ↔ (ν : Measure Ω) s = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, h, ENNReal.coe_zero],
fun h ↦ congrArg ENNReal.toNNReal h⟩
theorem apply_mono (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := by
rw [← coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn]
exact MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.apply_mono _ h
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
protected lemma tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {f : ι → Set Ω} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
simpa [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
using tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate (μ := μ.toMeasure)
@[simp] theorem apply_le_one (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ 1 := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
theorem nonempty (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : Nonempty Ω := by
by_contra maybe_empty
have zero : (μ : Measure Ω) univ = 0 := by
rw [univ_eq_empty_iff.mpr (not_nonempty_iff.mp maybe_empty), measure_empty]
rw [measure_univ] at zero
exact zero_ne_one zero.symm
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply toMeasure_injective
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
@[simp]
theorem mass_toFiniteMeasure (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : μ.toFiniteMeasure.mass = 1 :=
μ.coeFn_univ
theorem toFiniteMeasure_nonzero (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : μ.toFiniteMeasure ≠ 0 := by
simp [← FiniteMeasure.mass_nonzero_iff]
/-- The type of probability measures is a measurable space when equipped with the Giry monad. -/
instance : MeasurableSpace (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace
lemma measurableSet_isProbabilityMeasure :
MeasurableSet { μ : Measure Ω | IsProbabilityMeasure μ } := by
suffices { μ : Measure Ω | IsProbabilityMeasure μ } = (fun μ => μ univ) ⁻¹' {1} by
rw [this]
exact Measure.measurable_coe MeasurableSet.univ (measurableSet_singleton 1)
ext _
apply isProbabilityMeasure_iff
/-- The monoidal product is a measurable function from the product of probability spaces over
`α` and `β` into the type of probability spaces over `α × β`. Lemma 4.1 of [A synthetic approach to
Markov kernels, conditional independence and theorems on sufficient statistics][fritz2020]. -/
theorem measurable_prod {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
Measurable (fun (μ : ProbabilityMeasure α × ProbabilityMeasure β)
↦ μ.1.toMeasure.prod μ.2.toMeasure) := by
apply Measurable.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure generateFrom_prod.symm
isPiSystem_prod _
simp only [mem_image2, mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intros _ u Hu v Hv Heq
simp_rw [← Heq, Measure.prod_prod]
apply Measurable.mul
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe Hu).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_fst)
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe Hv).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_snd)
section convergence_in_distribution
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem testAgainstNN_lipschitz (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
LipschitzWith 1 fun f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0 ↦ μ.toFiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN f :=
μ.mass_toFiniteMeasure ▸ μ.toFiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_lipschitz
/-- The topology of weak convergence on `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure Ω`. This is inherited
(induced) from the topology of weak convergence of finite measures via the inclusion
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toFiniteMeasure`. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced toFiniteMeasure inferInstance
theorem toFiniteMeasure_continuous :
Continuous (toFiniteMeasure : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
continuous_induced_dom
/-- Probability measures yield elements of the `WeakDual` of bounded continuous nonnegative
functions via `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`, i.e., integration. -/
def toWeakDualBCNN : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :=
FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN ∘ toFiniteMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_toWeakDualBCNN (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
⇑μ.toWeakDualBCNN = μ.toFiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWeakDualBCNN_apply (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.toWeakDualBCNN f = (∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal := rfl
theorem toWeakDualBCNN_continuous : Continuous fun μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω ↦ μ.toWeakDualBCNN :=
FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN_continuous.comp toFiniteMeasure_continuous
/- Integration of (nonnegative bounded continuous) test functions against Borel probability
measures depends continuously on the measure. -/
theorem continuous_testAgainstNN_eval (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
Continuous fun μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω ↦ μ.toFiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN f :=
(FiniteMeasure.continuous_testAgainstNN_eval f).comp toFiniteMeasure_continuous
-- The canonical mapping from probability measures to finite measures is an embedding.
theorem toFiniteMeasure_isEmbedding (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] :
IsEmbedding (toFiniteMeasure : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → FiniteMeasure Ω) where
eq_induced := rfl
injective _μ _ν h := Subtype.eq <| congr_arg FiniteMeasure.toMeasure h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias toFiniteMeasure_embedding := toFiniteMeasure_isEmbedding
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds {δ : Type*} (F : Filter δ)
{μs : δ → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μ₀ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ₀) ↔ Tendsto (toFiniteMeasure ∘ μs) F (𝓝 μ₀.toFiniteMeasure) :=
(toFiniteMeasure_isEmbedding Ω).tendsto_nhds_iff
/-- A characterization of weak convergence of probability measures by the condition that the
integrals of every continuous bounded nonnegative function converge to the integral of the function
against the limit measure. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ}
{μs : γ → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds]
exact FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto
/-- The characterization of weak convergence of probability measures by the usual (defining)
condition that the integrals of every continuous bounded function converge to the integral of the
function against the limit measure. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ}
| {μs : γ → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ ω, f ω ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) := by
simp [tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds,
FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto]
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_integral_rclike_tendsto {γ : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/ProbabilityMeasure.lean | 317 | 324 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,030 | 2,033 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
theorem prodMap_image_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set α) (t : Set γ) :
(Prod.map f g) '' (s ×ˢ t) = (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' t) := by
ext
aesop
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_prod, singleton_prod]
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, prod_union, prod_singleton]
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
theorem mapsTo_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : MapsTo Prod.swap (s ×ˢ t) (t ×ˢ s) :=
fun _ ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨hy, hx⟩
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prodMap {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")] alias range_prod_map := range_prodMap
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prodMap]
apply range_comp_subset_range
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod := image_prodMk_subset_prod
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left := image_prodMk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right := image_prodMk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_fst_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.fst (s ×ˢ t) s :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).1
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_snd_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.snd (s ×ˢ t) t :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).2
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true, or_iff_left_iff_imp, or_false]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem subset_prod {s : Set (α × β)} : s ⊆ (Prod.fst '' s) ×ˢ (Prod.snd '' s) :=
fun _ hp ↦ mem_prod.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ_iff : diagonal α = univ ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, Prod.forall, mem_diagonal_iff]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : diagonal α = univ := diagonal_eq_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
end Diagonal
/-- A function is `Function.const α a` for some `a` if and only if `∀ x y, f x = f y`. -/
theorem range_const_eq_diagonal {α β : Type*} [hβ : Nonempty β] :
range (const α) = {f : α → β | ∀ x y, f x = f y} := by
refine (range_eq_iff _ _).mpr ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun f hf ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with h|⟨⟨a⟩⟩
· exact hβ.elim fun b ↦ ⟨b, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· exact ⟨f a, funext fun x ↦ hf _ _⟩
end Set
section Pullback
open Set
variable {X Y Z}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y Z$. -/
abbrev Function.Pullback (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) := {p : X × Z // f p.1 = g p.2}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y X$. -/
abbrev Function.PullbackSelf (f : X → Y) := f.Pullback f
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the first factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : X := p.val.1
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the second factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : Z := p.val.2
open Function.Pullback in
lemma Function.pullback_comm_sq (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) :
f ∘ @fst X Y Z f g = g ∘ @snd X Y Z f g := funext fun p ↦ p.2
/-- The diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X$. -/
@[simps]
def toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (x : X) : f.Pullback f := ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
/-- The diagonal $\Delta(X) \subseteq X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.pullbackDiagonal (f : X → Y) : Set (f.Pullback f) := {p | p.fst = p.snd}
/-- Three functions between the three pairs of spaces $X_i, Y_i, Z_i$ that are compatible
induce a function $X_1 \times_{Y_1} Z_1 \to X_2 \times_{Y_2} Z_2$. -/
def Function.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
(mapX : X₁ → X₂) (mapY : Y₁ → Y₂) (mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂)
(commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁) (commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁)
(p : f₁.Pullback g₁) : f₂.Pullback g₂ :=
⟨(mapX p.fst, mapZ p.snd),
(congr_fun commX _).trans <| (congr_arg mapY p.2).trans <| congr_fun commZ.symm _⟩
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_Z (X \times_Y Z) \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@snd X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → f.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback fst g fst (pullback_comm_sq f g) (pullback_comm_sq f g)
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_X (X \times_Y Z) \to Z \times_Y Z$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@fst X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → g.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback snd f snd (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm
open Function.PullbackSelf Function.Pullback
theorem preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
@map_fst X Y Z f g ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (@snd X Y Z f g) := by
ext ⟨⟨p₁, p₂⟩, he⟩
simp_rw [pullbackDiagonal, mem_setOf, Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff]
exact (and_iff_left he).symm
theorem Function.Injective.preimage_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → X} (inj : g.Injective) :
mapPullback g id g (by rfl) (by rfl) ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (f ∘ g) :=
ext fun _ ↦ inj.eq_iff
theorem image_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (s : Set X) :
toPullbackDiag f '' s = pullbackDiagonal f ∩ Subtype.val ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hx, hx⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : x = y, h2x⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h2x.1
theorem range_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : range (toPullbackDiag f) = pullbackDiagonal f := by
rw [← image_univ, image_toPullbackDiag, univ_prod_univ, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
theorem injective_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : (toPullbackDiag f).Injective :=
fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg Prod.fst (congr_arg Subtype.val h)
end Pullback
namespace Set
section OffDiag
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Set α → Set (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ =>
And.imp (@h _) <| And.imp_left <| @h _
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_nonempty : s.offDiag.Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [offDiag, Set.Nonempty, Set.Nontrivial]
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_eq_empty : s.offDiag = ∅ ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← not_nontrivial_iff, offDiag_nonempty.not]
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
alias ⟨_, Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
variable (s t)
theorem offDiag_subset_prod : s.offDiag ⊆ s ×ˢ s := fun _ hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1⟩
theorem offDiag_eq_sep_prod : s.offDiag = { x ∈ s ×ˢ s | x.1 ≠ x.2 } :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc.symm
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_univ : (univ : Set α).offDiag = (diagonal α)ᶜ :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_sdiff_diagonal : s ×ˢ s \ diagonal α = s.offDiag :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diagonal_offDiag : Disjoint (diagonal α) s.offDiag :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hd ho => ho.2.2 hd
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_inter_iff]
tauto
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_union, ne_eq, mem_prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0|h0, h1|h1, h2⟩ <;> simp [h0, h1, h2]
· rintro (((⟨h0, h1, h2⟩|⟨h0, h1, h2⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩) <;> simp [*]
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact Set.disjoint_left.mp h h0 h1
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact (Set.disjoint_right.mp h h0 h1).elim
theorem offDiag_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union, offDiag_singleton, union_empty, union_right_comm]
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro b hb (rfl : b = a)
exact ha hb
end OffDiag
/-! ### Cartesian set-indexed product of sets -/
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α β : ι → Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem empty_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by
ext
simp [pi]
theorem subsingleton_univ_pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Subsingleton) :
(univ.pi t).Subsingleton := fun _f hf _g hg ↦ funext fun i ↦
(ht i) (hf _ <| mem_univ _) (hg _ <| mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ (s : Set ι) : (pi s fun i => (univ : Set (α i))) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ _ _ => mem_univ _
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_ite (s : Set ι) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi univ fun i => if i ∈ s then t i else univ) = s.pi t := by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i; split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem pi_mono (h : ∀ i ∈ s, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : pi s t₁ ⊆ pi s t₂ := fun _ hx i hi => h i hi <| hx i hi
theorem pi_inter_distrib : (s.pi fun i => t i ∩ t₁ i) = s.pi t ∩ s.pi t₁ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [forall_and, mem_pi, mem_inter_iff]
theorem pi_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s₁, t₁ i = t₂ i) : s₁.pi t₁ = s₂.pi t₂ :=
h ▸ ext fun _ => forall₂_congr fun i hi => h' i hi ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem pi_eq_empty (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : t i = ∅) : s.pi t = ∅ := by
ext f
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, not_forall, iff_false, mem_pi, Classical.not_imp]
exact ⟨i, hs, by simp [ht]⟩
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty (ht : t i = ∅) : pi univ t = ∅ :=
pi_eq_empty (mem_univ i) ht
theorem pi_nonempty_iff : (s.pi t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, ∃ x, i ∈ s → x ∈ t i := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
theorem univ_pi_nonempty_iff : (pi univ t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, IsEmpty (α i) ∨ i ∈ s ∧ t i = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, pi_nonempty_iff]
push_neg
refine exists_congr fun i => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (α i) <;> simp [*, forall_and, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty_iff : pi univ t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, t i = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, univ_pi_nonempty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_empty [h : Nonempty ι] : pi univ (fun _ => ∅ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) = ∅ :=
univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.2 <| h.elim fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_univ_pi : Disjoint (pi univ t₁) (pi univ t₂) ↔ ∃ i, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, univ_pi_eq_empty_iff]
theorem Disjoint.set_pi (hi : i ∈ s) (ht : Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i)) : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h₁ h₂ => disjoint_left.1 ht (h₁ _ hi) (h₂ _ hi)
theorem uniqueElim_preimage [Unique ι] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
uniqueElim ⁻¹' pi univ t = t (default : ι) := by ext; simp [Unique.forall_iff]
section Nonempty
variable [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff' : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by simp [pi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_pi : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, pi_eq_empty_iff']
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_pi (i : ι) (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi (insert i s) t = eval i ⁻¹' t i ∩ pi s t := by
ext
simp [pi, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_pi (i : ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi {i} t = eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
ext
simp [pi]
theorem singleton_pi' (i : ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi {i} t = { x | x i ∈ t i } :=
singleton_pi i t
theorem univ_pi_singleton (f : ∀ i, α i) : (pi univ fun i => {f i}) = ({f} : Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
ext fun g => by simp [funext_iff]
theorem preimage_pi (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (β i)) (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) :
(fun (g : ∀ i, α i) i => f _ (g i)) ⁻¹' s.pi t = s.pi fun i => f i ⁻¹' t i :=
rfl
|
theorem pi_if {p : ι → Prop} [h : DecidablePred p] (s : Set ι) (t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi s fun i => if p i then t₁ i else t₂ i) =
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 720 | 722 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Path
/-!
# Path connectedness
Continuing from `Mathlib.Topology.Path`, this file defines path components and path-connected
spaces.
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
## Main theorems
* `Joined` is an equivalence relation, while `JoinedIn F` is at least symmetric and transitive.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
Furthermore, it is shown that continuous images and quotients of path-connected sets/spaces are
path-connected, and that every path-connected set/space is also connected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := h.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hxy.mem
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hyz.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
theorem JoinedIn.map_continuousOn (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := h
⟨γ.map' <| hf.mono (range_subset_iff.mpr hγ), fun t ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hγ t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.map (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
h.map_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem Topology.IsInducing.joinedIn_image {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (hx : x ∈ F)
(hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) ↔ JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨?_, (.map · hf.continuous)⟩
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ'F hγ' using hγ
have h₀ : x ⤳ γ' 0 := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.source]
have h₁ : γ' 1 ⤳ y := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.target]
have h : JoinedIn F (γ' 0) (γ' 1) := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'F⟩
simpa only [hf.continuous_iff, comp_def, hγ'] using map_continuous γ
exact (h₀.joinedIn hx (hγ'F _)).trans <| h.trans <| h₁.joinedIn (hγ'F _) hy
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.joinedIn_image := IsInducing.joinedIn_image
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
theorem mem_pathComponent_iff : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ Joined y x := .rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
theorem mem_pathComponentIn_self (h : x ∈ F) : x ∈ pathComponentIn x F :=
JoinedIn.refl h
theorem pathComponentIn_subset : pathComponentIn x F ⊆ F :=
fun _ hy ↦ hy.target_mem
theorem pathComponentIn_nonempty_iff : (pathComponentIn x F).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨γ, hγ⟩⟩ ↦ γ.source ▸ hγ 0, fun hx ↦ ⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self hx⟩⟩
theorem pathComponentIn_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponentIn y F) :
pathComponentIn x F = pathComponentIn y F := by
ext; exact ⟨h.trans, h.symm.trans⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem pathComponentIn_mono {G : Set X} (h : F ⊆ G) :
pathComponentIn x F ⊆ pathComponentIn x G :=
fun _ ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ ⟨γ, fun t ↦ h (hγ t)⟩
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (f '' F) :=
hF.image' hf.continuousOn
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
simp only [IsPathConnected, forall_mem_image, exists_mem_image]
refine exists_congr fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun hx ↦ forall₂_congr fun y hy ↦ ?_
rw [hf.joinedIn_image hx hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPathConnected_iff := IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.isInducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponentIn {s : Set X} (hs : IsPathConnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ pathComponentIn x F :=
fun y hys ↦ (hs.joinedIn x hxs y hys).mono hsF
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (h : x ∈ F) : IsPathConnected (pathComponentIn x F) :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self h, fun ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ by
refine ⟨γ, fun t ↦
⟨(γ.truncateOfLE t.2.1).cast (γ.extend_zero.symm) (γ.extend_extends' t).symm, fun t' ↦ ?_⟩⟩
dsimp [Path.truncateOfLE, Path.truncate]
exact γ.extend_extends' ⟨min (max t'.1 0) t.1, by simp [t.2.1, t.2.2]⟩ ▸ hγ _⟩
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponent : IsPathConnected (pathComponent x) := by
rw [← pathComponentIn_univ]
exact isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (mem_univ x)
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_val, inter_eq_right.2 hWU]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction n with
| zero =>
use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
| succ n hn =>
rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
apply union_subset hγ₀.2
rw [range_subset_iff]
exact hγ₁
have hpp' : ∀ k < n + 1, p k = p' k := by
intro k hk
simp only [p', hk, dif_pos]
congr
ext
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt hk]
use γ.cast (hpp' 0 n.zero_lt_succ) (hpp' n n.lt_succ_self)
simp only [γ.cast_coe]
refine And.intro hγ.2 ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
suffices p ⟨i, hi⟩ = p' i by convert hγ.1 i (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hi)
rw [← hpp' i hi]
suffices i = i % n.succ by congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), (∀ t, γ t ∈ s) ∧ ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
rcases h.exists_path_through_family p hp with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
rcases hγ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simp only [range, mem_setOf_eq] at h₂
rw [range_subset_iff] at h₁
choose! t ht using h₂
exact ⟨γ, t, h₁, ht⟩
/-! ### Path connected spaces -/
/-- A topological space is path-connected if it is non-empty and every two points can be
joined by a continuous path. -/
@[mk_iff]
class PathConnectedSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A path-connected space must be nonempty. -/
nonempty : Nonempty X
/-- Any two points in a path-connected space must be joined by a continuous path. -/
joined : ∀ x y : X, Joined x y
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy :
PathConnectedSpace X ↔ Nonempty (ZerothHomotopy X) ∧ Subsingleton (ZerothHomotopy X) := by
letI := pathSetoid X
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr h.1, ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quotient.sound (PathConnectedSpace.joined x y)
· unfold ZerothHomotopy
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
exact ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mp h, fun x y => Quotient.exact <| Subsingleton.elim ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧⟩
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
/-- Use path-connectedness to build a path between two points. -/
def somePath (x y : X) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some (joined x y)
end PathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff, isPathConnected_iff, nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
theorem isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace F := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, image_univ,
Subtype.range_val_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem isPathConnected_univ [PathConnectedSpace X] : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) :=
pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp inferInstance
theorem isPathConnected_range [PathConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact isPathConnected_univ.image hf
theorem Function.Surjective.pathConnectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : PathConnectedSpace Y := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isPathConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instPathConnectedSpace {s : Setoid X} [PathConnectedSpace X] :
PathConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.pathConnectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
/-- This is a special case of `NormedSpace.instPathConnectedSpace` (and
`IsTopologicalAddGroup.pathConnectedSpace`). It exists only to simplify dependencies. -/
instance Real.instPathConnectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace ℝ where
joined x y := ⟨⟨⟨fun (t : I) ↦ (1 - t) * x + t * y, by fun_prop⟩, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
nonempty := inferInstance
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_eq : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ∃ x : X, pathComponent x = univ := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, isPathConnected_iff_eq]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X] :
ConnectedSpace X := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent]
rcases isPathConnected_iff_eq.mp (pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp ‹_›) with ⟨x, _x_in, hx⟩
use x
rw [← univ_subset_iff]
exact (by simpa using hx : pathComponent x = univ) ▸ pathComponent_subset_component x
theorem IsPathConnected.isConnected (hF : IsPathConnected F) : IsConnected F := by
rw [isConnected_iff_connectedSpace]
rw [isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace] at hF
exact @PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace _ _ hF
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
theorem exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, h⟩
theorem exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family' p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, t, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, t, h⟩
end PathConnectedSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 695 | 700 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
/-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homFamily_arrow_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
P.homFamily ⟨Arrow.mk f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
| @[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow.mk f ∈ P.toSet ↔ P f := Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 138 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Dedup
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.UnionInter
/-!
# Erasing duplicates in a multiset.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-! ### dedup -/
/-- `dedup s` removes duplicates from `s`, yielding a `nodup` multiset. -/
def dedup (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.dedup : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound p.dedup
@[simp]
theorem coe_dedup (l : List α) : @dedup α _ l = l.dedup :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dedup_zero : @dedup α _ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_dedup {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ dedup s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.mem_dedup
@[simp]
theorem dedup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → dedup (a ::ₘ s) = dedup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ m => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ ofList <| List.dedup_cons_of_mem m
@[simp]
theorem dedup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → dedup (a ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ dedup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ m => congr_arg ofList <| List.dedup_cons_of_not_mem m
theorem dedup_le (s : Multiset α) : dedup s ≤ s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => (dedup_sublist _).subperm
theorem dedup_subset (s : Multiset α) : dedup s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le <| dedup_le _
theorem subset_dedup (s : Multiset α) : s ⊆ dedup s := fun _ => mem_dedup.2
@[simp]
theorem dedup_subset' {s t : Multiset α} : dedup s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans (subset_dedup _), Subset.trans (dedup_subset _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_dedup' {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ dedup t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h (dedup_subset _), fun h => Subset.trans h (subset_dedup _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_dedup (s : Multiset α) : Nodup (dedup s) :=
Quot.induction_on s List.nodup_dedup
theorem dedup_eq_self {s : Multiset α} : dedup s = s ↔ Nodup s :=
⟨fun e => e ▸ nodup_dedup s, Quot.induction_on s fun _ h => congr_arg ofList h.dedup⟩
alias ⟨_, Nodup.dedup⟩ := dedup_eq_self
theorem count_dedup (m : Multiset α) (a : α) : m.dedup.count a = if a ∈ m then 1 else 0 :=
Quot.induction_on m fun _ => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_dedup, mem_coe, List.mem_dedup, coe_nodup, coe_count]
apply List.count_dedup _ _
@[simp]
theorem dedup_idem {m : Multiset α} : m.dedup.dedup = m.dedup :=
Quot.induction_on m fun _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ ofList List.dedup_idem
theorem dedup_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} : dedup s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => eq_zero_of_subset_zero <| h ▸ subset_dedup _, fun h => h.symm ▸ dedup_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem dedup_singleton {a : α} : dedup ({a} : Multiset α) = {a} :=
| (nodup_singleton _).dedup
theorem le_dedup {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ dedup t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ Nodup s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_trans h (dedup_le _), nodup_of_le h (nodup_dedup _)⟩,
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Dedup.lean | 87 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
|
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 296 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ConditionallyCompleteOrder
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Discrete
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Topology on the integers
The structure of a metric space on `ℤ` is introduced in this file, induced from `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Metric Set Topology
namespace Int
instance : Dist ℤ :=
⟨fun x y => dist (x : ℝ) y⟩
theorem dist_eq (x y : ℤ) : dist x y = |(x : ℝ) - y| := rfl
theorem dist_eq' (m n : ℤ) : dist m n = |m - n| := by rw [dist_eq]; norm_cast
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem dist_cast_real (x y : ℤ) : dist (x : ℝ) y = dist x y :=
rfl
theorem pairwise_one_le_dist : Pairwise fun m n : ℤ => 1 ≤ dist m n := by
intro m n hne
rw [dist_eq]; norm_cast; rwa [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), Int.add_one_le_iff, abs_pos, sub_ne_zero]
theorem isUniformEmbedding_coe_real : IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) :=
| isUniformEmbedding_bot_of_pairwise_le_dist zero_lt_one pairwise_one_le_dist
theorem isClosedEmbedding_coe_real : IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Int.lean | 42 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
/-! # Convexity properties of the Gamma function
In this file, we prove that `Gamma` and `log ∘ Gamma` are convex functions on the positive real
line. We then prove the Bohr-Mollerup theorem, which characterises `Gamma` as the *unique*
positive-real-valued, log-convex function on the positive reals satisfying `f (x + 1) = x f x` and
`f 1 = 1`.
The proof of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem is bound up with the proof of (a weak form of) the Euler
limit formula, `Real.BohrMollerup.tendsto_logGammaSeq`, stating that for positive
real `x` the sequence `x * log n + log n! - ∑ (m : ℕ) ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + m)`
tends to `log Γ(x)` as `n → ∞`. We prove that any function satisfying the hypotheses of the
Bohr-Mollerup theorem must agree with the limit in the Euler limit formula, so there is at most one
such function; then we show that `Γ` satisfies these conditions.
Since most of the auxiliary lemmas for the Bohr-Mollerup theorem are of no relevance outside the
context of this proof, we place them in a separate namespace `Real.BohrMollerup` to avoid clutter.
(This includes the logarithmic form of the Euler limit formula, since later we will prove a more
general form of the Euler limit formula valid for any real or complex `x`; see
`Real.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` and `Complex.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` in the file
`Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean`.)
As an application of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem we prove the Legendre doubling formula for the
Gamma function for real positive `s` (which will be upgraded to a proof for all complex `s` in a
later file).
TODO: This argument can be extended to prove the general `k`-multiplication formula (at least up
to a constant, and it should be possible to deduce the value of this constant using Stirling's
formula).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat ENNReal Topology Real
namespace Real
section Convexity
/-- Log-convexity of the Gamma function on the positive reals (stated in multiplicative form),
proved using the Hölder inequality applied to Euler's integral. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_add_mul_le_rpow_Gamma_mul_rpow_Gamma {s t a b : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
Gamma (a * s + b * t) ≤ Gamma s ^ a * Gamma t ^ b := by
-- We will apply Hölder's inequality, for the conjugate exponents `p = 1 / a`
-- and `q = 1 / b`, to the functions `f a s` and `f b t`, where `f` is as follows:
let f : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ → ℝ := fun c u x => exp (-c * x) * x ^ (c * (u - 1))
have e : HolderConjugate (1 / a) (1 / b) := Real.holderConjugate_one_div ha hb hab
| have hab' : b = 1 - a := by linarith
have hst : 0 < a * s + b * t := by positivity
-- some properties of f:
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/BohrMollerup.lean | 59 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Derivative and series expansion of real logarithm
In this file we prove that `Real.log` is infinitely smooth at all nonzero `x : ℝ`. We also prove
that the series `∑' n : ℕ, x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)` converges to `(-Real.log (1 - x))` for all
`x : ℝ`, `|x| < 1`.
## Tags
logarithm, derivative
-/
open Filter Finset Set
open scoped Topology ContDiff
namespace Real
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
have : HasStrictDerivAt log (exp <| log x)⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_exp <| log x).of_local_left_inverse (continuousAt_log hx.ne')
(ne_of_gt <| exp_pos _) <|
Eventually.mono (lt_mem_nhds hx) @exp_log
rwa [exp_log hx] at this
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· convert (hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hx)).comp x (hasStrictDerivAt_neg x) using 1
· ext y; exact (log_neg_eq_log y).symm
· field_simp [hx.ne]
· exact hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos hx
theorem hasDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt log x⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).hasDerivAt
@[fun_prop] theorem differentiableAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).differentiableAt
theorem differentiableOn_log : DifferentiableOn ℝ log {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(differentiableAt_log hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_log_iff : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h => continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, differentiableAt_log⟩
theorem deriv_log (x : ℝ) : deriv log x = x⁻¹ :=
if hx : x = 0 then by
rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (differentiableAt_log_iff.not_left.2 hx), hx, inv_zero]
else (hasDerivAt_log hx).deriv
@[simp]
theorem deriv_log' : deriv log = Inv.inv :=
funext deriv_log
theorem contDiffAt_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {x : ℝ} : ContDiffAt ℝ n log x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
have A y (hy : 0 < y) : ContDiffAt ℝ n log y := by
apply expPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv (f₀' := y) hy.ne' (by simpa)
· convert hasDerivAt_exp (log y)
rw [exp_log hy]
· exact analyticAt_rexp.contDiffAt
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· have : ContDiffAt ℝ n (log ∘ (fun y ↦ -y)) x := by
apply ContDiffAt.comp
apply A _ (Left.neg_pos_iff.mpr hx)
apply contDiffAt_id.neg
convert this
ext x
simp
· exact A x hx
theorem contDiffOn_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiffOn ℝ n log {0}ᶜ := by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
exact (contDiffAt_log.2 hx).contDiffWithinAt
end Real
section LogDifferentiable
open Real
section deriv
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.log (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) s x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.log (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hf.log hx
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.log (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).comp x hf
theorem derivWithin.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => log (f x)) s x = derivWithin f s x / f x :=
(hf.hasDerivWithinAt.log hx).derivWithin hxs
@[simp]
theorem deriv.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x => log (f x)) x = deriv f x / f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.log hx).deriv
/-- The derivative of `log ∘ f` is the logarithmic derivative provided `f` is differentiable and
`f x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma Real.deriv_log_comp_eq_logDeriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (h₁ : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h₂ : f x ≠ 0) : deriv (log ∘ f) x = logDeriv f x := by
simp only [ne_eq, logDeriv, Pi.div_apply, ← deriv.log h₁ h₂, Function.comp_def]
end deriv
section fderiv
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {x : E} {f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
{s : Set E}
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.log (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') s x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.log (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.log (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.log hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.log hx).differentiableAt
theorem ContDiffAt.log {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) x :=
(contDiffAt_log.2 hx).comp x hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.log {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) s x :=
(contDiffAt_log.2 hx).comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
theorem ContDiffOn.log {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).log (hs x hx)
theorem ContDiff.log {n} (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => log (f x) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.log (h x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.log (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s := fun x h => (hf x h).log (hx x h)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.log (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => log (f x) := fun x => (hf x).log (hx x)
theorem fderivWithin.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ s x) :
fderivWithin ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s x = (f x)⁻¹ • fderivWithin ℝ f s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.log hx).fderivWithin hxs
@[simp]
theorem fderiv.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
fderiv ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) x = (f x)⁻¹ • fderiv ℝ f x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.log hx).fderiv
end fderiv
end LogDifferentiable
namespace Real
/-- The function `x * log (1 + t / x)` tends to `t` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_log_one_plus_div_atTop (t : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x * log (1 + t / x)) atTop (𝓝 t) := by
have h₁ : Tendsto (fun h => h⁻¹ * log (1 + t * h)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 t) := by
simpa [hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope, slope_fun_def] using
(((hasDerivAt_id (0 : ℝ)).const_mul t).const_add 1).log (by simp)
have h₂ : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x⁻¹) atTop (𝓝[≠] 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_nhdsGT_zero.mono_right (nhdsGT_le_nhdsNE _)
simpa only [Function.comp_def, inv_inv] using h₁.comp h₂
/-- A crude lemma estimating the difference between `log (1-x)` and its Taylor series at `0`,
where the main point of the bound is that it tends to `0`. The goal is to deduce the series
expansion of the logarithm, in `hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_1`.
TODO: use one of generic theorems about Taylor's series to prove this estimate.
-/
theorem abs_log_sub_add_sum_range_le {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) (n : ℕ) :
|(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) + log (1 - x)| ≤ |x| ^ (n + 1) / (1 - |x|) := by
/- For the proof, we show that the derivative of the function to be estimated is small,
and then apply the mean value inequality. -/
let F : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) + log (1 - x)
let F' : ℝ → ℝ := fun x ↦ -x ^ n / (1 - x)
-- Porting note: In `mathlib3`, the proof used `deriv`/`DifferentiableAt`. `simp` failed to
-- compute `deriv`, so I changed the proof to use `HasDerivAt` instead
-- First step: compute the derivative of `F`
have A : ∀ y ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivAt F (F' y) y := fun y hy ↦ by
have : HasDerivAt F ((∑ i ∈ range n, ↑(i + 1) * y ^ i / (↑i + 1)) + (-1) / (1 - y)) y :=
.add (.sum fun i _ ↦ (hasDerivAt_pow (i + 1) y).div_const ((i : ℝ) + 1))
(((hasDerivAt_id y).const_sub _).log <| sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne')
convert this using 1
calc
-y ^ n / (1 - y) = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, y ^ i + -1 / (1 - y) := by
field_simp [geom_sum_eq hy.2.ne, sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne, sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne']
ring
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, ↑(i + 1) * y ^ i / (↑i + 1) + -1 / (1 - y) := by
congr with i
rw [Nat.cast_succ, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Nat.cast_add_one_pos i).ne']
-- second step: show that the derivative of `F` is small
have B : ∀ y ∈ Icc (-|x|) |x|, |F' y| ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) := fun y hy ↦
calc
|F' y| = |y| ^ n / |1 - y| := by simp [F', abs_div]
_ ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) := by
have : |y| ≤ |x| := abs_le.2 hy
have : 1 - |x| ≤ |1 - y| := le_trans (by linarith [hy.2]) (le_abs_self _)
gcongr
exact sub_pos.2 h
-- third step: apply the mean value inequality
have C : ‖F x - F 0‖ ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) * ‖x - 0‖ := by
refine Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy ↦ (A _ ?_).hasDerivWithinAt) B (convex_Icc _ _) ?_ ?_
· exact Icc_subset_Ioo (neg_lt_neg h) h hy
· simp
· simp [le_abs_self x, neg_le.mp (neg_le_abs x)]
-- fourth step: conclude by massaging the inequality of the third step
simpa [F, div_mul_eq_mul_div, pow_succ] using C
/-- Power series expansion of the logarithm around `1`. -/
theorem hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_one {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)) (-log (1 - x)) := by
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
· show Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) atTop (𝓝 (-log (1 - x)))
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
simp only [norm_eq_abs, sub_neg_eq_add]
refine squeeze_zero (fun n => abs_nonneg _) (abs_log_sub_add_sum_range_le h) ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun t : ℕ => |x| ^ (t + 1) / (1 - |x|)) atTop (𝓝 (|x| * 0 / (1 - |x|))) by
simpa
simp only [pow_succ']
refine (tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_).div_const _
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg _) h
| show Summable fun n : ℕ => x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)
refine .of_norm_bounded _ (summable_geometric_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg _) h) fun i => ?_
calc
‖x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)‖ = |x| ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1) := by
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ i + 1 := le_of_lt (Nat.cast_add_one_pos i)
rw [norm_eq_abs, abs_div, ← pow_abs, abs_of_nonneg this]
_ ≤ |x| ^ (i + 1) / (0 + 1) := by
gcongr
exact i.cast_nonneg
_ ≤ |x| ^ i := by
simpa [pow_succ] using mul_le_of_le_one_right (pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg x) i) (le_of_lt h)
/-- Power series expansion of `log(1 + x) - log(1 - x)` for `|x| < 1`. -/
theorem hasSum_log_sub_log_of_abs_lt_one {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) :
HasSum (fun k : ℕ => (2 : ℝ) * (1 / (2 * k + 1)) * x ^ (2 * k + 1))
(log (1 + x) - log (1 - x)) := by
set term := fun n : ℕ => -1 * ((-x) ^ (n + 1) / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) + x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)
have h_term_eq_goal :
term ∘ (2 * ·) = fun k : ℕ => 2 * (1 / (2 * k + 1)) * x ^ (2 * k + 1) := by
ext n
dsimp only [term, (· ∘ ·)]
rw [Odd.neg_pow (⟨n, rfl⟩ : Odd (2 * n + 1)) x]
push_cast
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Deriv.lean | 268 | 290 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.ConcreteSheafification
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.Image
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.Sieves
/-!
# Subsheaf of types
We define the sub(pre)sheaf of a type valued presheaf.
## Main results
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf` :
A subpresheaf of a presheaf of types.
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafify` :
The sheafification of a subpresheaf as a subpresheaf. Note that this is a sheaf only when the
whole sheaf is.
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafify_isSheaf` :
The sheafification is a sheaf
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafifyLift` :
The descent of a map into a sheaf to the sheafification.
- `CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.imageSheaf` : The image sheaf of a morphism.
- `CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.imageFactorization` : The image sheaf as a
`Limits.imageFactorization`.
-/
universe w v u
open Opposite CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {F F' F'' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (G G' : Subpresheaf F)
/-- The sheafification of a subpresheaf as a subpresheaf.
Note that this is a sheaf only when the whole presheaf is a sheaf. -/
def Subpresheaf.sheafify : Subpresheaf F where
obj U := { s | G.sieveOfSection s ∈ J (unop U) }
map := by
rintro U V i s hs
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.pullback_stable i.unop hs)
intro _ _ h
dsimp at h ⊢
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
theorem Subpresheaf.le_sheafify : G ≤ G.sheafify J := by
intro U s hs
change _ ∈ J _
convert J.top_mem U.unop -- Porting note: `U.unop` can not be inferred now
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro V i -
exact G.map i.op hs
variable {J}
theorem Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) (hG : Presieve.IsSheaf J G.toPresheaf) :
G = G.sheafify J := by
apply (G.le_sheafify J).antisymm
intro U s hs
suffices ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).1 = s by
rw [← this]
exact ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).2
apply (h _ hs).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V i hi
exact (congr_arg Subtype.val ((hG _ hs).valid_glue (G.family_of_elements_compatible s) _ hi) :)
theorem Subpresheaf.sheafify_isSheaf (hF : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
Presieve.IsSheaf J (G.sheafify J).toPresheaf := by
intro U S hS x hx
let S' := Sieve.bind S fun Y f hf => G.sieveOfSection (x f hf).1
have := fun (V) (i : V ⟶ U) (hi : S' i) => hi
-- Porting note: change to explicit variable so that `choose` can find the correct
-- dependent functions. Thus everything follows need two additional explicit variables.
choose W i₁ i₂ hi₂ h₁ h₂ using this
dsimp [-Sieve.bind_apply] at *
let x'' : Presieve.FamilyOfElements F S' := fun V i hi => F.map (i₁ V i hi).op (x _ (hi₂ V i hi))
have H : ∀ s, x.IsAmalgamation s ↔ x''.IsAmalgamation s.1 := by
intro s
constructor
· intro H V i hi
dsimp only [x'']
conv_lhs => rw [← h₂ _ _ hi]
rw [← H _ (hi₂ _ _ hi)]
exact FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply F (i₂ _ _ hi).op (i₁ _ _ hi).op _
· intro H V i hi
refine Subtype.ext ?_
apply (hF _ (x i hi).2).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V' i' hi'
have hi'' : S' (i' ≫ i) := ⟨_, _, _, hi, hi', rfl⟩
have := H _ hi''
rw [op_comp, F.map_comp] at this
exact this.trans (congr_arg Subtype.val (hx _ _ (hi₂ _ _ hi'') hi (h₂ _ _ hi'')))
have : x''.Compatible := by
intro V₁ V₂ V₃ g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄ S₁ S₂ e
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
exact
congr_arg Subtype.val
(hx (g₁ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₁) (g₂ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₂) (hi₂ _ _ S₁) (hi₂ _ _ S₂)
| (by simp only [Category.assoc, h₂, e]))
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hF _ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2) _ this
refine ⟨⟨t, _⟩, (H ⟨t, ?_⟩).mpr ht, fun y hy => Subtype.ext (ht' _ ((H _).mp hy))⟩
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Subsheaf.lean | 110 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Filtration
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Discrete
/-!
# Adapted and progressively measurable processes
This file defines some standard definition from the theory of stochastic processes including
filtrations and stopping times. These definitions are used to model the amount of information
at a specific time and are the first step in formalizing stochastic processes.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted`: a sequence of functions `u` is said to be adapted to a
filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u i` is `f i`-strongly measurable
* `MeasureTheory.ProgMeasurable`: a sequence of functions `u` is said to be progressively
measurable with respect to a filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u` restricted to
`Set.Iic i × Ω` is strongly measurable with respect to the product `MeasurableSpace` structure
where the σ-algebra used for `Ω` is `f i`.
## Main results
* `Adapted.progMeasurable_of_continuous`: a continuous adapted process is progressively measurable.
## Tags
adapted, progressively measurable
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder ι]
{u v : ι → Ω → β} {f : Filtration ι m}
/-- A sequence of functions `u` is adapted to a filtration `f` if for all `i`,
`u i` is `f i`-measurable. -/
def Adapted (f : Filtration ι m) (u : ι → Ω → β) : Prop :=
∀ i : ι, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (u i)
namespace Adapted
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hu : Adapted f u) (hv : Adapted f v) :
Adapted f (u * v) := fun i => (hu i).mul (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hu : Adapted f u) (hv : Adapted f v) :
Adapted f (u / v) := fun i => (hu i).div (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv [Group β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hu : Adapted f u) :
Adapted f u⁻¹ := fun i => (hu i).inv
protected theorem smul [SMul ℝ β] [ContinuousSMul ℝ β] (c : ℝ) (hu : Adapted f u) :
Adapted f (c • u) := fun i => (hu i).const_smul c
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable {i : ι} (hf : Adapted f u) : StronglyMeasurable[m] (u i) :=
(hf i).mono (f.le i)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_le {i j : ι} (hf : Adapted f u) (hij : i ≤ j) :
StronglyMeasurable[f j] (u i) := (hf i).mono (f.mono hij)
end Adapted
theorem adapted_const (f : Filtration ι m) (x : β) : Adapted f fun _ _ => x := fun _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const
variable (β) in
theorem adapted_zero [Zero β] (f : Filtration ι m) : Adapted f (0 : ι → Ω → β) := fun i =>
@stronglyMeasurable_zero Ω β (f i) _ _
theorem Filtration.adapted_natural [MetrizableSpace β] [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{u : ι → Ω → β} (hum : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[m] (u i)) :
Adapted (Filtration.natural u hum) u := by
intro i
refine StronglyMeasurable.mono ?_ (le_iSup₂_of_le i (le_refl i) le_rfl)
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨measurable_iff_comap_le.2 le_rfl, (hum i).isSeparable_range⟩
/-- Progressively measurable process. A sequence of functions `u` is said to be progressively
measurable with respect to a filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u` restricted to
`Set.Iic i × Ω` is measurable with respect to the product `MeasurableSpace` structure where the
σ-algebra used for `Ω` is `f i`.
The usual definition uses the interval `[0,i]`, which we replace by `Set.Iic i`. We recover the
usual definition for index types `ℝ≥0` or `ℕ`. -/
def ProgMeasurable [MeasurableSpace ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (u : ι → Ω → β) : Prop :=
∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)] fun p : Set.Iic i × Ω => u p.1 p.2
theorem progMeasurable_const [MeasurableSpace ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (b : β) :
ProgMeasurable f (fun _ _ => b : ι → Ω → β) := fun i =>
@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ (Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)) _ _
namespace ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι]
protected theorem adapted (h : ProgMeasurable f u) : Adapted f u := by
intro i
have : u i = (fun p : Set.Iic i × Ω => u p.1 p.2) ∘ fun x => (⟨i, Set.mem_Iic.mpr le_rfl⟩, x) :=
rfl
rw [this]
exact (h i).comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
protected theorem comp {t : ι → Ω → ι} [TopologicalSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι]
(h : ProgMeasurable f u) (ht : ProgMeasurable f t) (ht_le : ∀ i ω, t i ω ≤ i) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => u (t i ω) ω := by
intro i
have : (fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω => u (t (p.fst : ι) p.snd) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω => u (p.fst : ι) p.snd) ∘ fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω =>
(⟨t (p.fst : ι) p.snd, Set.mem_Iic.mpr ((ht_le _ _).trans p.fst.prop)⟩, p.snd) := rfl
rw [this]
exact (h i).comp_measurable ((ht i).measurable.subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_snd)
section Arithmetic
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hu : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hv : ProgMeasurable f v) : ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => u i ω * v i ω := fun i =>
(hu i).mul (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem finset_prod' {γ} [CommMonoid β] [ContinuousMul β] {U : γ → ι → Ω → β}
{s : Finset γ} (h : ∀ c ∈ s, ProgMeasurable f (U c)) : ProgMeasurable f (∏ c ∈ s, U c) :=
Finset.prod_induction U (ProgMeasurable f) (fun _ _ => ProgMeasurable.mul)
(progMeasurable_const _ 1) h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem finset_prod {γ} [CommMonoid β] [ContinuousMul β] {U : γ → ι → Ω → β}
{s : Finset γ} (h : ∀ c ∈ s, ProgMeasurable f (U c)) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i a => ∏ c ∈ s, U c i a := by
convert ProgMeasurable.finset_prod' h using 1; ext (i a); simp only [Finset.prod_apply]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv [Group β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hu : ProgMeasurable f u) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => (u i ω)⁻¹ := fun i => (hu i).inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div [Group β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hu : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hv : ProgMeasurable f v) : ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => u i ω / v i ω := fun i =>
(hu i).div (hv i)
end Arithmetic
end ProgMeasurable
theorem progMeasurable_of_tendsto' {γ} [MeasurableSpace ι] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
(fltr : Filter γ) [fltr.NeBot] [fltr.IsCountablyGenerated] {U : γ → ι → Ω → β}
(h : ∀ l, ProgMeasurable f (U l)) (h_tendsto : Tendsto U fltr (𝓝 u)) : ProgMeasurable f u := by
intro i
apply @stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (Set.Iic i × Ω) β γ
(MeasurableSpace.prod _ (f i)) _ _ fltr _ _ _ _ fun l => h l i
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at h_tendsto ⊢
intro x
specialize h_tendsto x.fst
rw [tendsto_nhds] at h_tendsto ⊢
exact fun s hs h_mem => h_tendsto {g | g x.snd ∈ s} (hs.preimage (continuous_apply x.snd)) h_mem
theorem progMeasurable_of_tendsto [MeasurableSpace ι] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {U : ℕ → ι → Ω → β}
(h : ∀ l, ProgMeasurable f (U l)) (h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 u)) : ProgMeasurable f u :=
progMeasurable_of_tendsto' atTop h h_tendsto
/-- A continuous and adapted process is progressively measurable. -/
theorem Adapted.progMeasurable_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [OpensMeasurableSpace ι]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (h : Adapted f u) (hu_cont : ∀ ω, Continuous fun i => u i ω) :
ProgMeasurable f u := fun i =>
@stronglyMeasurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_stronglyMeasurable _ _ (Set.Iic i) _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(f i) _ (fun ω => (hu_cont ω).comp continuous_induced_dom) fun j => (h j).mono (f.mono j.prop)
/-- For filtrations indexed by a discrete order, `Adapted` and `ProgMeasurable` are equivalent.
This lemma provides `Adapted f u → ProgMeasurable f u`.
See `ProgMeasurable.adapted` for the reverse direction, which is true more generally. -/
theorem Adapted.progMeasurable_of_discrete [TopologicalSpace ι] [DiscreteTopology ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [OpensMeasurableSpace ι]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (h : Adapted f u) : ProgMeasurable f u :=
h.progMeasurable_of_continuous fun _ => continuous_of_discreteTopology
| -- this dot notation will make more sense once we have a more general definition for predictable
theorem Predictable.adapted {f : Filtration ℕ m} {u : ℕ → Ω → β} (hu : Adapted f fun n => u (n + 1))
(hu0 : StronglyMeasurable[f 0] (u 0)) : Adapted f u := fun n =>
match n with
| 0 => hu0
| n + 1 => (hu n).mono (f.mono n.le_succ)
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Adapted.lean | 188 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ker
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Pi
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Basic
/-!
# The cofinite filter
In this file we define
`Filter.cofinite`: the filter of sets with finite complement
and prove its basic properties. In particular, we prove that for `ℕ` it is equal to `Filter.atTop`.
## TODO
Define filters for other cardinalities of the complement.
-/
open Set Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {l : Filter α}
namespace Filter
/-- The cofinite filter is the filter of subsets whose complements are finite. -/
def cofinite : Filter α :=
comk Set.Finite finite_empty (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ ht.subset hsub) fun _ h _ ↦ h.union
@[simp]
theorem mem_cofinite {s : Set α} : s ∈ @cofinite α ↔ sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ { x | ¬p x }.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasBasis_cofinite : HasBasis cofinite (fun s : Set α => s.Finite) compl :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨fun h => ⟨sᶜ, h, (compl_compl s).subset⟩, fun ⟨_t, htf, hts⟩ =>
htf.subset <| compl_subset_comm.2 hts⟩⟩
instance cofinite_neBot [Infinite α] : NeBot (@cofinite α) :=
hasBasis_cofinite.neBot_iff.2 fun hs => hs.infinite_compl.nonempty
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot_iff : @cofinite α = ⊥ ↔ Finite α := by
simp [← empty_mem_iff_bot, finite_univ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot [Finite α] : @cofinite α = ⊥ := cofinite_eq_bot_iff.2 ‹_›
theorem frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ Set.Infinite { x | p x } := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_cofinite, not_not, Set.Infinite]
lemma frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s) ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.frequently_cofinite⟩ := frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
@[simp]
lemma cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_mem_iff_neBot.symm.trans frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.cofinite_inf_principal_neBot⟩ := cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.compl_mem_cofinite {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : sᶜ ∈ @cofinite α :=
mem_cofinite.2 <| (compl_compl s).symm ▸ hs
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_cofinite_nmem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
hs.compl_mem_cofinite
theorem _root_.Finset.eventually_cofinite_nmem (s : Finset α) : ∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
s.finite_toSet.eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_frequently_cofinite {s : Set α} :
Set.Infinite s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite.symm
theorem eventually_cofinite_ne (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in cofinite, a ≠ x :=
(Set.finite_singleton x).eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, {x}ᶜ ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h x => h (finite_singleton x).compl_mem_cofinite, fun h s (hs : sᶜ.Finite) => ?_⟩
rw [← compl_compl s, ← biUnion_of_singleton sᶜ, compl_iUnion₂, Filter.biInter_mem hs]
exact fun x _ => h x
theorem le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ y in l, y ≠ x :=
le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no top element, then `atTop ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atTop_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] : (atTop : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atTop
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no bottom element, then `atBot ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atBot_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] : (atBot : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atBot
theorem comap_cofinite_le (f : α → β) : comap f cofinite ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr fun x =>
mem_comap.2 ⟨{f x}ᶜ, (finite_singleton _).compl_mem_cofinite, fun _ => ne_of_apply_ne f⟩
/-- The coproduct of the cofinite filters on two types is the cofinite filter on their product. -/
theorem coprod_cofinite : (cofinite : Filter α).coprod (cofinite : Filter β) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprod, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff]
theorem coprodᵢ_cofinite {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] :
(Filter.coprodᵢ fun i => (cofinite : Filter (α i))) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprodᵢ, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, forall_finite_image_eval_iff]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_left : Disjoint cofinite l ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s := by
simp [l.basis_sets.disjoint_iff_right]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_right : Disjoint l cofinite ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_cofinite_left
/-- If `l ≥ Filter.cofinite` is a countably generated filter, then `l.ker` is cocountable. -/
theorem countable_compl_ker [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : cofinite ≤ l) : Set.Countable l.kerᶜ := by
rcases exists_antitone_basis l with ⟨s, hs⟩
simp only [hs.ker, iInter_true, compl_iInter]
exact countable_iUnion fun n ↦ Set.Finite.countable <| h <| hs.mem _
/-- If `f` tends to a countably generated filter `l` along `Filter.cofinite`,
then for all but countably many elements, `f x ∈ l.ker`. -/
theorem Tendsto.countable_compl_preimage_ker {f : α → β}
{l : Filter β} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : Tendsto f cofinite l) :
Set.Countable (f ⁻¹' l.ker)ᶜ := by rw [← ker_comap]; exact countable_compl_ker h.le_comap
/-- Given a collection of filters `l i : Filter (α i)` and sets `s i ∈ l i`,
if all but finitely many of `s i` are the whole space,
then their indexed product `Set.pi Set.univ s` belongs to the filter `Filter.pi l`. -/
theorem univ_pi_mem_pi {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)}
(h : ∀ i, s i ∈ l i) (hfin : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, s i = univ) : univ.pi s ∈ pi l := by
filter_upwards [pi_mem_pi hfin fun i _ ↦ h i] with a ha i _
if hi : s i = univ then
simp [hi]
else
exact ha i hi
/-- Given a family of maps `f i : α i → β i` and a family of filters `l i : Filter (α i)`,
if all but finitely many of `f i` are surjective,
then the indexed product of `f i`s maps the indexed product of the filters `l i`
to the indexed products of their pushforwards under individual `f i`s.
|
See also `map_piMap_pi_finite` for the case of a finite index type.
-/
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Cofinite.lean | 158 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = #{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} = {i ∈ Icc 1 b | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
∏ p ∈ range m with p.Prime, p ^ padicValNat p n = n := by
nth_rw 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
obtain ⟨hp1, hp2⟩ := Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
/-! ### Lemmas about factorizations of particular functions -/
-- TODO: Port lemmas from `Data/Nat/Multiplicity` to here, re-written in terms of `factorization`
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `[1, n]` are multiples of `p`.
See `Nat.card_multiples'` for an alternative spelling of the statement. -/
theorem card_multiples (n p : ℕ) : #{e ∈ range n | p ∣ e + 1} = n / p := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, Finset.range_succ, filter_insert, apply_ite card,
card_insert_of_not_mem, hn]
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `(0, n]` are multiples of `p`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card_eq_div (n p : ℕ) : #{x ∈ Ioc 0 n | p ∣ x} = n / p := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
-- TODO: Golf away `h1` after Yaël PRs a lemma asserting this
have h1 : Ioc 0 n.succ = insert n.succ (Ioc 0 n) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
simp_rw [← Ico_succ_succ, Ico_insert_right (succ_le_succ hn.le), Ico_succ_right]
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, h1, filter_insert, apply_ite card, card_insert_eq_ite, IH,
Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ioc, not_le.2 (lt_add_one n)]
/-- There are exactly `⌊N/n⌋` positive multiples of `n` that are `≤ N`.
See `Nat.card_multiples` for a "shifted-by-one" version. -/
lemma card_multiples' (N n : ℕ) : #{k ∈ range N.succ | k ≠ 0 ∧ n ∣ k} = N / n := by
induction N with
| zero => simp [Finset.filter_false_of_mem]
| succ N ih =>
rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
by_cases h : n ∣ N.succ
· simp [h, succ_div_of_dvd, ih]
· simp [h, succ_div_of_not_dvd, ih]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 779 | 782 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
| rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 204 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
/-- The alphabet for the stacks in the program. `bit0` and `bit1` are used to represent `ℕ` values
as lists of binary digits, `cons` is used to separate `List ℕ` values, and `consₗ` is used to
separate `List (List ℕ)` values. See the section documentation. -/
inductive Γ'
| consₗ
| cons
| bit0
| bit1
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
/-- The four stacks used by the program. `main` is used to store the input value in `trNormal`
mode and the output value in `Λ'.ret` mode, while `stack` is used to keep all the data for the
continuations. `rev` is used to store reversed lists when transferring values between stacks, and
`aux` is only used once in `cons₁`. See the section documentation. -/
inductive K'
| main
| rev
| aux
| stack
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open K'
/-- Continuations as in `ToPartrec.Cont` but with the data removed. This is done because we want
the set of all continuations in the program to be finite (so that it can ultimately be encoded into
the finite state machine of a Turing machine), but a continuation can handle a potentially infinite
number of data values during execution. -/
inductive Cont'
| halt
| cons₁ : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| cons₂ : Cont' → Cont'
| comp : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| fix : Code → Cont' → Cont'
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
/-- The set of program positions. We make extensive use of inductive types here to let us describe
"subroutines"; for example `clear p k q` is a program that clears stack `k`, then does `q` where
`q` is another label. In order to prevent this from resulting in an infinite number of distinct
accessible states, we are careful to be non-recursive (although loops are okay). See the section
documentation for a description of all the programs. -/
inductive Λ'
| move (p : Γ' → Bool) (k₁ k₂ : K') (q : Λ')
| clear (p : Γ' → Bool) (k : K') (q : Λ')
| copy (q : Λ')
| push (k : K') (s : Option Γ' → Option Γ') (q : Λ')
| read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')
| succ (q : Λ')
| pred (q₁ q₂ : Λ')
| ret (k : Cont')
compile_inductive% Code
compile_inductive% Cont'
compile_inductive% K'
compile_inductive% Λ'
instance Λ'.instInhabited : Inhabited Λ' :=
⟨Λ'.ret Cont'.halt⟩
instance Λ'.instDecidableEq : DecidableEq Λ' := fun a b => by
induction a generalizing b <;> cases b <;> first
| apply Decidable.isFalse; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩; done
| exact decidable_of_iff' _ (by simp [funext_iff]; rfl)
/-- The type of TM2 statements used by this machine. -/
def Stmt' :=
TM2.Stmt (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
/-- The type of TM2 configurations used by this machine. -/
def Cfg' :=
TM2.Cfg (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
open TM2.Stmt
/-- A predicate that detects the end of a natural number, either `Γ'.cons` or `Γ'.consₗ` (or
implicitly the end of the list), for use in predicate-taking functions like `move` and `clear`. -/
@[simp]
def natEnd : Γ' → Bool
| Γ'.consₗ => true
| Γ'.cons => true
| _ => false
attribute [nolint simpNF] natEnd.eq_3
/-- Pop a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def pop' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
pop k fun _ v => v
/-- Peek a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def peek' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
peek k fun _ v => v
/-- Push the value in the local store to the given stack. -/
@[simp]
def push' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
push k fun x => x.iget
/-- Move everything from the `rev` stack to the `main` stack (reversed). -/
def unrev :=
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev main
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds, with the last element being left on `k₁`. -/
def moveExcl (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ <| Λ'.push k₁ id q
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` without reversion, by performing a double move via the `rev`
stack. -/
def move₂ (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
moveExcl p k₁ rev <| Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev k₂ q
/-- Assuming `trList v` is on the front of stack `k`, remove it, and push `v.headI` onto `main`.
See the section documentation. -/
def head (k : K') (q : Λ') : Λ' :=
Λ'.move natEnd k rev <|
(Λ'.push rev fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <|
Λ'.read fun s =>
(if s = some Γ'.consₗ then id else Λ'.clear (fun x => x = Γ'.consₗ) k) <| unrev q
/-- The program that evaluates code `c` with continuation `k`. This expects an initial state where
`trList v` is on `main`, `trContStack k` is on `stack`, and `aux` and `rev` are empty.
See the section documentation for details. -/
@[simp]
def trNormal : Code → Cont' → Λ'
| Code.zero', k => (Λ'.push main fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.succ, k => head main <| Λ'.succ <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.tail, k => Λ'.clear natEnd main <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.cons f fs, k =>
(Λ'.push stack fun _ => some Γ'.consₗ) <|
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) main rev <| Λ'.copy <| trNormal f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)
| Code.comp f g, k => trNormal g (Cont'.comp f k)
| Code.case f g, k => Λ'.pred (trNormal f k) (trNormal g k)
| Code.fix f, k => trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
/-- The main program. See the section documentation for details. -/
def tr : Λ' → Stmt'
| Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q =>
pop' k₁ <|
branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)
| Λ'.push k f q =>
branch (fun s => (f s).isSome) ((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q)
(goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.read q => goto q
| Λ'.clear p k q =>
pop' k <| branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)
| Λ'.copy q =>
pop' rev <|
branch Option.isSome (push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.succ q =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1) ((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =>
goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k) => goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k) => goto fun _ => trNormal f k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k) =>
pop' main <|
goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
| Λ'.ret Cont'.halt => (load fun _ => none) <| halt
@[simp]
theorem tr_move (p k₁ k₂ q) : tr (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q) =
pop' k₁ (branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_push (k f q) : tr (Λ'.push k f q) = branch (fun s => (f s).isSome)
((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => q) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_read (q) : tr (Λ'.read q) = goto q := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_clear (p k q) : tr (Λ'.clear p k q) = pop' k (branch
(fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_copy (q) : tr (Λ'.copy q) = pop' rev (branch Option.isSome
(push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_succ (q) : tr (Λ'.succ q) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_pred (q₁ q₂) : tr (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₁ (fs k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)) = goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₂ (k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k)) =
goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_comp (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k)) = goto fun _ => trNormal f k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_fix (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k)) = pop' main (goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_halt : tr (Λ'.ret Cont'.halt) = (load fun _ => none) halt := rfl
/-- Translating a `Cont` continuation to a `Cont'` continuation simply entails dropping all the
data. This data is instead encoded in `trContStack` in the configuration. -/
def trCont : Cont → Cont'
| Cont.halt => Cont'.halt
| Cont.cons₁ c _ k => Cont'.cons₁ c (trCont k)
| Cont.cons₂ _ k => Cont'.cons₂ (trCont k)
| Cont.comp c k => Cont'.comp c (trCont k)
| Cont.fix c k => Cont'.fix c (trCont k)
/-- We use `PosNum` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. A natural number is
represented as a little-endian list of `bit0` and `bit1` elements:
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
In particular, this representation guarantees no trailing `bit0`'s at the end of the list. -/
def trPosNum : PosNum → List Γ'
| PosNum.one => [Γ'.bit1]
| PosNum.bit0 n => Γ'.bit0 :: trPosNum n
| PosNum.bit1 n => Γ'.bit1 :: trPosNum n
/-- We use `Num` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. Positive numbers are
translated using `trPosNum`, and `trNum 0 = []`. So there are never any trailing `bit0`'s in
a translated `Num`.
0 = []
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
-/
def trNum : Num → List Γ'
| Num.zero => []
| Num.pos n => trPosNum n
/-- Because we use binary encoding, we define `trNat` in terms of `trNum`, using `Num`, which are
binary natural numbers. (We could also use `Nat.binaryRecOn`, but `Num` and `PosNum` make for
easy inductions.) -/
def trNat (n : ℕ) : List Γ' :=
trNum n
@[simp]
theorem trNat_zero : trNat 0 = [] := by rw [trNat, Nat.cast_zero]; rfl
theorem trNat_default : trNat default = [] :=
trNat_zero
/-- Lists are translated with a `cons` after each encoded number.
For example:
[] = []
[0] = [cons]
[1] = [bit1, cons]
[6, 0] = [bit0, bit1, bit1, cons, cons]
-/
@[simp]
def trList : List ℕ → List Γ'
| [] => []
| n::ns => trNat n ++ Γ'.cons :: trList ns
/-- Lists of lists are translated with a `consₗ` after each encoded list.
For example:
[] = []
[[]] = [consₗ]
[[], []] = [consₗ, consₗ]
[[0]] = [cons, consₗ]
[[1, 2], [0]] = [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ, cons, consₗ]
-/
@[simp]
def trLList : List (List ℕ) → List Γ'
| [] => []
| l::ls => trList l ++ Γ'.consₗ :: trLList ls
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
@[simp]
def contStack : Cont → List (List ℕ)
| Cont.halt => []
| Cont.cons₁ _ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.cons₂ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.comp _ k => contStack k
| Cont.fix _ k => contStack k
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
def trContStack (k : Cont) :=
trLList (contStack k)
/-- This is the nondependent eliminator for `K'`, but we use it specifically here in order to
represent the stack data as four lists rather than as a function `K' → List Γ'`, because this makes
rewrites easier. The theorems `K'.elim_update_main` et. al. show how such a function is updated
after an `update` to one of the components. -/
def K'.elim (a b c d : List Γ') : K' → List Γ'
| K'.main => a
| K'.rev => b
| K'.aux => c
| K'.stack => d
-- The equation lemma of `elim` simplifies to `match` structures.
theorem K'.elim_main (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.main = a := rfl
theorem K'.elim_rev (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.rev = b := rfl
theorem K'.elim_aux (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.aux = c := rfl
theorem K'.elim_stack (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.stack = d := rfl
attribute [simp] K'.elim
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_main {a b c d a'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) main a' = K'.elim a' b c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_rev {a b c d b'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) rev b' = K'.elim a b' c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_aux {a b c d c'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) aux c' = K'.elim a b c' d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_stack {a b c d d'} :
update (K'.elim a b c d) stack d' = K'.elim a b c d' := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl
/-- The halting state corresponding to a `List ℕ` output value. -/
def halt (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨none, none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
/-- The `Cfg` states map to `Cfg'` states almost one to one, except that in normal operation the
local store contains an arbitrary garbage value. To make the final theorem cleaner we explicitly
clear it in the halt state so that there is exactly one configuration corresponding to output `v`.
-/
def TrCfg : Cfg → Cfg' → Prop
| Cfg.ret k v, c' =>
∃ s, c' = ⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩
| Cfg.halt v, c' => c' = halt v
/-- This could be a general list definition, but it is also somewhat specialized to this
application. `splitAtPred p L` will search `L` for the first element satisfying `p`.
If it is found, say `L = l₁ ++ a :: l₂` where `a` satisfies `p` but `l₁` does not, then it returns
`(l₁, some a, l₂)`. Otherwise, if there is no such element, it returns `(L, none, [])`. -/
def splitAtPred {α} (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × Option α × List α
| [] => ([], none, [])
| a :: as =>
cond (p a) ([], some a, as) <|
let ⟨l₁, o, l₂⟩ := splitAtPred p as
⟨a::l₁, o, l₂⟩
theorem splitAtPred_eq {α} (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L l₁ o l₂,
(∀ x ∈ l₁, p x = false) →
Option.elim' (L = l₁ ∧ l₂ = []) (fun a => p a = true ∧ L = l₁ ++ a::l₂) o →
splitAtPred p L = (l₁, o, l₂)
| [], _, none, _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
| [], l₁, some o, l₂, _, ⟨_, h₃⟩ => by simp at h₃
| a :: L, l₁, o, l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [splitAtPred]
have IH := splitAtPred_eq p L
rcases o with - | o
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH L none [] _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩]
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨h₂, ⟨⟩⟩
· rw [h₂, cond]
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH l₁ (some o) l₂ _ ⟨h₂, _⟩] <;> try rfl
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
theorem splitAtPred_false {α} (L : List α) : splitAtPred (fun _ => false) L = (L, none, []) :=
splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => rfl) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem move_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ k₂)
(e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, o, update (update S k₁ L₂) k₂ (L₁.reverseAux (S k₂))⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· rw [(_ : [].reverseAux _ = _), Function.update_eq_self]
swap
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h₁.symm, List.reverseAux_nil]
refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux]
revert e; rcases S k₁ with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons, Option.iget_some] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
simp only [e]
rfl
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', Option.elim, TM2.stepAux, push']
rcases e₁ : S k₁ with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, ne_eq, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update (update S k₁ Sk) k₂ (a :: S k₂)) _ using 2 <;>
simp [Function.update_of_ne, h₁, h₁.symm, e₃, List.reverseAux]
simp [Function.update_comm h₁.symm]
theorem unrev_ok {q s} {S : K' → List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (unrev q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S rev []) main (List.reverseAux (S rev) (S main))⟩ :=
move_ok (by decide) <| splitAtPred_false _
theorem move₂_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ rev ∧ k₂ ≠ rev ∧ k₁ ≠ k₂)
(h₂ : S rev = []) (e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (move₂ p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S k₁ (o.elim id List.cons L₂)) k₂ (L₁ ++ S k₂)⟩ := by
refine (move_ok h₁.1 e).trans (TransGen.head rfl ?_)
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, id_eq, ne_eq, Option.elim]
cases o <;> simp only [Option.elim] <;> rw [tr]
<;> simp only [id, TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_true, cond_false]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [Function.update_comm h₁.1, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, List.reverseAux_eq, h₂, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, List.reverse_reverse]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [h₂, Function.update_comm h₁.1, List.reverseAux_eq, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1, Function.update_self, List.reverse_reverse]
theorem clear_ok {p k q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (e : splitAtPred p (S k) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.clear p k q), s, S⟩ ⟨some q, o, update S k L₂⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
revert e; rcases S k with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
rcases e with ⟨e₁, e₂⟩
rw [e₁, e₂]
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
rcases e₁ : S k with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update S k Sk) _ using 2 <;> simp [e₃]
theorem copy_ok (q s a b c d) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.copy q), s, K'.elim a b c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (List.reverseAux b a) [] c (List.reverseAux b d)⟩ := by
induction' b with x b IH generalizing a d s
· refine TransGen.single ?_
simp
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_rev, List.head?_cons, Option.isSome_some,
List.tail_cons, elim_update_rev, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_update_main,
elim_stack, elim_update_stack, cond_true, List.reverseAux_cons, pop', push']
exact IH _ _ _
theorem trPosNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trPosNum n, natEnd x = false
| PosNum.one, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
| PosNum.bit1 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit1 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
theorem trNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trNum n, natEnd x = false
| Num.pos n, x, h => trPosNum_natEnd n x h
theorem trNat_natEnd (n) : ∀ x ∈ trNat n, natEnd x = false :=
trNum_natEnd _
theorem trList_ne_consₗ : ∀ (l), ∀ x ∈ trList l, x ≠ Γ'.consₗ
| a :: l, x, h => by
simp only [trList, List.mem_append, List.mem_cons] at h
obtain h | rfl | h := h
· rintro rfl
cases trNat_natEnd _ _ h
· rintro ⟨⟩
· exact trList_ne_consₗ l _ h
theorem head_main_ok {q s L} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (head main q), s, K'.elim (trList L) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [L.headI]) [] c d⟩ := by
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn L none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat L.headI) o (trList L.tail) (trNat_natEnd _) ?_)).trans
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
· cases L <;> simp [o]
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_update_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev,
Function.update_self, trList]
rw [if_neg (show o ≠ some Γ'.consₗ by cases L <;> simp [o])]
refine (clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ none [] ?_ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)).trans ?_
· exact fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)
convert unrev_ok using 2; simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem head_stack_ok {q s L₁ L₂ L₃} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (head stack q), s, K'.elim (trList L₁) [] [] (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList (L₂.headI :: L₁)) [] [] L₃⟩ := by
rcases L₂ with - | ⟨a, L₂⟩
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ [] (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃ (by rintro _ ⟨⟩) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_true, id_eq, trList, List.nil_append,
elim_update_stack, elim_rev, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_nil, trNat_default]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat a) (some Γ'.cons) (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)
(trNat_natEnd _) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_false, trList, List.append_assoc,
List.cons_append, elim_update_stack, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_cons]
refine
TransGen.trans
(clear_ok
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trList L₂) (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem succ_ok {q s n} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.succ q), s, K'.elim (trList [n]) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [n.succ]) [] c d⟩ := by
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, decide_false, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, decide_true, Function.update_self,
cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 1
simp only [elim_update_rev, elim_rev, elim_main, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_main]
rfl
simp only [trNum, Num.succ, Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a.succ) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some q.succ, s, K'.elim (trPosNum a ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp? [List.reverseAux] at e says simp only [List.reverseAux, List.reverseAux_eq] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m _ generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, [Γ'.bit1], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (Γ'.bit0 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp [PosNum.succ, trPosNum]
rfl
· refine ⟨l₁, _, some Γ'.bit0, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step]; rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.stepAux, pop', elim_main, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq]
rfl
theorem pred_ok (q₁ q₂ s v) (c d : List Γ') : ∃ s',
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] c d⟩
(v.headI.rec ⟨some q₁, s', K'.elim (trList v.tail) [] c d⟩ fun n _ =>
⟨some q₂, s', K'.elim (trList (n::v.tail)) [] c d⟩) := by
rcases v with (_ | ⟨_ | n, v⟩)
· refine ⟨none, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
· refine ⟨some Γ'.cons, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
refine ⟨none, ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, trNum, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ,
List.tail_cons, List.headI_cons]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· simp only [trPosNum, Num.succ', List.singleton_append, List.nil_append]
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
simp only [Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (q₁.pred q₂), s, K'.elim (trPosNum a.succ ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q₂), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m IH generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit1::l₁, [], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum, show PosNum.one.succ = PosNum.one.bit0 from rfl]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (some Γ'.bit0) (Γ'.bit1 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp
rfl
· obtain ⟨a, l, e, h⟩ : ∃ a l, (trPosNum m = a::l) ∧ natEnd a = false := by
cases m <;> refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, _, some a, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp [trPosNum, PosNum.succ, e, h, show some Γ'.bit1 ≠ some Γ'.bit0 by decide,
Option.iget, -natEnd]
rfl
theorem trNormal_respects (c k v s) :
∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepNormal c k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (trNormal c (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction c generalizing k v s with
| zero' => refine ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, TransGen.single ?_⟩; simp
| succ => refine ⟨_, ⟨none, rfl⟩, head_main_ok.trans succ_ok⟩
| tail =>
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn v none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine ⟨_, ⟨o, rfl⟩, ?_⟩; convert clear_ok _ using 2
· simp; rfl
swap
refine splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI) _ _ (trNat_natEnd _) ?_
cases v <;> simp [o]
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf (Cont.cons₁ fs v k) v none
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| (move_ok (by decide) (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, elim_stack, elim_update_stack, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev]
refine (copy_ok _ none [] (trList v).reverse _ _).trans ?_
convert h₂ using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq, trContStack]
| comp f _ _ IHg => exact IHg (Cont.comp f k) v s
| case f g IHf IHg =>
rw [stepNormal]
simp only
obtain ⟨s', h⟩ := pred_ok _ _ s v _ _
revert h; rcases v.headI with - | n <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHg k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
| fix f IH => apply IH
theorem tr_ret_respects (k v s) : ∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepRet k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction k generalizing v s with
| halt => exact ⟨_, rfl, TransGen.single rfl⟩
| cons₁ fs as k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects fs (Cont.cons₂ v k) as none
refine ⟨s', h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩; simp
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, id_eq, elim_update_main, elim_main, elim_aux,
List.append_nil, elim_update_aux]
refine (move₂_ok (L₁ := ?_) (o := ?_) (L₂ := ?_) (by decide) rfl ?_).trans ?_
pick_goal 4
· exact splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ (some Γ'.consₗ) _
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, elim_update_stack, elim_main,
List.append_nil, elim_update_main, id_eq, elim_update_aux, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_aux, elim_stack]
exact h₂
| cons₂ ns k IH =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH (ns.headI :: v) none
exact ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| head_stack_ok.trans h₂⟩
| comp f k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f k v s
exact ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl h₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [stepRet]
have :
if v.headI = 0 then natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = true ∧ (trList v).tail = trList v.tail
else
natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = false ∧
(trList v).tail = (trNat v.headI).tail ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v.tail := by
obtain - | n := v
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases n with - | n
· simp
rw [trList, List.headI, trNat, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ, List.tail]
cases (n : Num).succ' <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
by_cases h : v.headI = 0 <;> simp only [h, ite_true, ite_false] at this ⊢
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH v.tail (trList v).head?
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this, elim_update_main]
exact h₂
· obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f (Cont.fix f k) v.tail (some Γ'.cons)
refine ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| TransGen.trans ?_ h₂⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this.1]
convert clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI).tail (some Γ'.cons) _ _ _) using 2
· simp
convert rfl
· exact fun x h => trNat_natEnd _ _ (List.tail_subset _ h)
· exact ⟨rfl, this.2⟩
theorem tr_respects : Respects step (TM2.step tr) TrCfg
| Cfg.ret _ _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => tr_ret_respects _ _ _
| Cfg.halt _, _, rfl => rfl
/-- The initial state, evaluating function `c` on input `v`. -/
def init (c : Code) (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨some (trNormal c Cont'.halt), none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
theorem tr_init (c v) :
∃ b, TrCfg (stepNormal c Cont.halt v) b ∧ Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) (init c v) b :=
trNormal_respects _ _ _ _
theorem tr_eval (c v) : eval (TM2.step tr) (init c v) = halt <$> Code.eval c v := by
obtain ⟨i, h₁, h₂⟩ := tr_init c v
refine Part.ext fun x => ?_
rw [reaches_eval h₂.to_reflTransGen]; simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := tr_eval_rev tr_respects h₁ h
simp [stepNormal_eval] at hc₂
obtain ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩ := hc₂
exact ⟨_, hv, hc₁.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩
have := Turing.tr_eval (b₁ := Cfg.halt v') tr_respects h₁
simp only [stepNormal_eval, Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff, Cfg.halt.injEq,
exists_eq_right] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩ := this hv
exact h
/-- The set of machine states reachable via downward label jumps, discounting jumps via `ret`. -/
def trStmts₁ : Λ' → Finset Λ'
| Q@(Λ'.move _ _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.push _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.read q) => insert Q <| Finset.univ.biUnion fun s => trStmts₁ (q s)
| Q@(Λ'.clear _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.copy q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.succ q) => insert Q <| insert (unrev q) <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ insert (unrev q₂) (trStmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(Λ'.ret _) => {Q}
theorem trStmts₁_trans {q q'} : q' ∈ trStmts₁ q → trStmts₁ q' ⊆ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
all_goals
simp +contextual only [trStmts₁, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union,
or_imp, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.Subset.refl, imp_true_iff, true_and]
repeat exact fun h => Finset.Subset.trans (q_ih h) (Finset.subset_insert _ _)
· simp
intro s h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr ⟨_, q_ih s h h'⟩
· constructor
· rintro rfl
apply Finset.subset_insert
· intro h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| q_ih h h')
· refine ⟨fun h x h' => ?_, fun _ x h' => ?_, fun h x h' => ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl <| q₁_ih h h')
· rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h' with h' | h' <;> simp [h', unrev]
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| q₂_ih h h')
theorem trStmts₁_self (q) : q ∈ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q <;> · first |apply Finset.mem_singleton_self|apply Finset.mem_insert_self
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c`,
including the state `ret k` but not any states after that (that is, the states visited while
evaluating `k`). -/
def codeSupp' : Code → Cont' → Finset Λ'
| c@Code.zero', k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.succ, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.tail, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@(Code.cons f fs), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) ∪
(trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k))))
| c@(Code.comp f g), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' g (Cont'.comp f k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (trNormal f k) ∪ codeSupp' f k))
| c@(Code.case f g), k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪ (codeSupp' f k ∪ codeSupp' g k)
| c@(Code.fix f), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.fix f k) ∪
(trStmts₁ (Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) ∪ {Λ'.ret k}))
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp'_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp' c k := by
cases c <;> first | rfl | exact Finset.union_subset_left (fun _ a ↦ a)
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of a continuation
`k`, not including the initial state `ret k`. -/
def contSupp : Cont' → Finset Λ'
| Cont'.cons₁ fs k =>
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k))
| Cont'.cons₂ k => trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.comp f k => codeSupp' f k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.fix f k => codeSupp' (Code.fix f) k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.halt => ∅
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c` in
continuation `k`. This is actually closed under forward simulation (see `tr_supports`), and the
existence of this set means that the machine constructed in this section is in fact a proper
Turing machine, with a finite set of states. -/
def codeSupp (c : Code) (k : Cont') : Finset Λ' :=
codeSupp' c k ∪ contSupp k
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp c k :=
Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp'_self _ _) (Finset.union_subset_left fun _ a ↦ a)
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_zero (k) : codeSupp Code.zero' k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.zero' k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_succ (k) : codeSupp Code.succ k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.succ k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_tail (k) : codeSupp Code.tail k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.tail k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_cons (f fs k) :
codeSupp (Code.cons f fs) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.cons f fs) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_comp (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.comp f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.comp f g) k) ∪ codeSupp g (Cont'.comp f k) := by
simp only [codeSupp, codeSupp', trNormal, Finset.union_assoc, contSupp]
rw [← Finset.union_assoc _ _ (contSupp k),
Finset.union_eq_right.2 (codeSupp'_self _ _)]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_case (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.case f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.case f g) k) ∪ (codeSupp f k ∪ codeSupp g k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_fix (f k) :
codeSupp (Code.fix f) k = trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.fix f) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm,
Finset.union_left_idem]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₁ (fs k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
codeSupp fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₂ (k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₂ k) = trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_comp (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.comp f k) = codeSupp f k :=
rfl
theorem contSupp_fix (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.fix f k) = codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp +contextual [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc,
Finset.subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_halt : contSupp Cont'.halt = ∅ :=
rfl
/-- The statement `Λ'.Supports S q` means that `contSupp k ⊆ S` for any `ret k`
reachable from `q`.
(This is a technical condition used in the proof that the machine is supported.) -/
def Λ'.Supports (S : Finset Λ') : Λ' → Prop
| Λ'.move _ _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.push _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.read q => ∀ s, Λ'.Supports S (q s)
| Λ'.clear _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.copy q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.succ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ => Λ'.Supports S q₁ ∧ Λ'.Supports S q₂
| Λ'.ret k => contSupp k ⊆ S
/-- A shorthand for the predicate that we are proving in the main theorems `trStmts₁_supports`,
`codeSupp'_supports`, `contSupp_supports`, `codeSupp_supports`. The set `S` is fixed throughout
the proof, and denotes the full set of states in the machine, while `K` is a subset that we are
currently proving a property about. The predicate asserts that every state in `K` is closed in `S`
under forward simulation, i.e. stepping forward through evaluation starting from any state in `K`
stays entirely within `S`. -/
def Supports (K S : Finset Λ') :=
∀ q ∈ K, TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q)
theorem supports_insert {K S q} :
Supports (insert q K) S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) ∧ Supports K S := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_singleton {S q} : Supports {q} S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_union {K₁ K₂ S} : Supports (K₁ ∪ K₂) S ↔ Supports K₁ S ∧ Supports K₂ S := by
simp [Supports, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem supports_biUnion {K : Option Γ' → Finset Λ'} {S} :
Supports (Finset.univ.biUnion K) S ↔ ∀ a, Supports (K a) S := by
simpa [Supports] using forall_swap
theorem head_supports {S k q} (H : (q : Λ').Supports S) : (head k q).Supports S := fun _ => by
dsimp only; split_ifs <;> exact H
theorem ret_supports {S k} (H₁ : contSupp k ⊆ S) : TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr (Λ'.ret k)) := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
cases k with
| halt => trivial
| cons₁ => rw [contSupp_cons₁, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| cons₂ => rw [contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| comp => rw [contSupp_comp] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁ (codeSupp_self _ _ W)
| fix =>
rw [contSupp_fix] at H₁
have L := @Finset.mem_union_left; have R := @Finset.mem_union_right
intro s; dsimp only; cases natEnd s.iget
· refine H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| L _ W)
· exact H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| R _ <| Finset.mem_singleton_self _)
theorem trStmts₁_supports {S q} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (HS₁ : trStmts₁ q ⊆ S) :
Supports (trStmts₁ q) S := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
simp [trStmts₁, -Finset.singleton_subset_iff] at HS₁ ⊢
any_goals
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 HS₁
first | have h₃ := h₂ W | try simp [Finset.subset_iff] at h₂
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- move
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- clear
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- copy
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- push
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨fun _ => h₂ _ W, ?_⟩ -- read
exact supports_biUnion.2 fun _ => q_ih _ (H₁ _) fun _ h => h₂ _ h
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩ -- succ
exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ W, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂.2⟩
· refine -- pred
supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl W),
fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr W), fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact q₁_ih H₁.1 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl h)
· exact q₂_ih H₁.2 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr h)
· exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports H₁) -- ret
theorem trStmts₁_supports' {S q K} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (H₂ : trStmts₁ q ∪ K ⊆ S)
(H₃ : K ⊆ S → Supports K S) : Supports (trStmts₁ q ∪ K) S := by
simp only [Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact supports_union.2 ⟨trStmts₁_supports H₁ H₂.1, H₃ H₂.2⟩
theorem trNormal_supports {S c k} (Hk : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : (trNormal c k).Supports S := by
induction c generalizing k with simp [Λ'.Supports, head]
| zero' => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| succ => intro; split_ifs <;> exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| tail => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
apply IHf
rw [codeSupp_cons] at Hk
exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| comp f g _ IHg => apply IHg; rw [codeSupp_comp] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| case f g IHf IHg =>
simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at Hk
exact ⟨IHf Hk.2.1, IHg Hk.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf => apply IHf; rw [codeSupp_fix] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
theorem codeSupp'_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp' c k) S := by
induction c generalizing k with
| cons f fs IHf IHfs =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_cons, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun h => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2, H.2⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHfs ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₁] at H'
exact Finset.union_subset_right (Finset.union_subset_right H'.2)
exact
trStmts₁_supports (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
(Finset.union_subset_right h)
| comp f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; rw [codeSupp_comp] at H'; have H' := Finset.union_subset_right H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHg H', ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2, H.2⟩
exact IHf (Finset.union_subset_right H')
| case f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun _ => ?_
exact supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2.1, IHg H'.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_fix, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp, trStmts₁,
Finset.insert_subset_iff] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨H.1.1, h⟩, H.2⟩
exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
| _ => exact trStmts₁_supports (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp_self _ _) H)
theorem contSupp_supports {S k} (H : contSupp k ⊆ S) : Supports (contSupp k) S := by
induction k with
| halt => simp [contSupp_halt, Supports]
| cons₁ f k IH =>
have H₁ := H; rw [contSupp_cons₁] at H₁; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H₁
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H₂) H₁ fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H₂, ?_⟩
simp only [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports H₂.2.2) (Finset.union_subset_right h) IH
| cons₂ k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_cons₂] at H'
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H') H' IH
| comp f k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_comp] at H'; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H'
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H', IH H₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [contSupp] at H
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, IH (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
theorem codeSupp_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp c k) S :=
supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, contSupp_supports (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
/-- The set `codeSupp c k` is a finite set that witnesses the effective finiteness of the `tr`
Turing machine. Starting from the initial state `trNormal c k`, forward simulation uses only
states in `codeSupp c k`, so this is a finite state machine. Even though the underlying type of
state labels `Λ'` is infinite, for a given partial recursive function `c` and continuation `k`,
only finitely many states are accessed, corresponding roughly to subterms of `c`. -/
theorem tr_supports (c k) : @TM2.Supports _ _ _ _ ⟨trNormal c k⟩ tr (codeSupp c k) :=
⟨codeSupp_self _ _ (trStmts₁_self _), fun _ => codeSupp_supports (Finset.Subset.refl _) _⟩
end
end PartrecToTM2
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 1,749 | 1,750 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,411 | 1,413 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.RelClasses
/-!
# Relation homomorphisms, embeddings, isomorphisms
This file defines relation homomorphisms, embeddings, isomorphisms and order embeddings and
isomorphisms.
## Main declarations
* `RelHom`: Relation homomorphism. A `RelHom r s` is a function `f : α → β` such that
`r a b → s (f a) (f b)`.
* `RelEmbedding`: Relation embedding. A `RelEmbedding r s` is an embedding `f : α ↪ β` such that
`r a b ↔ s (f a) (f b)`.
* `RelIso`: Relation isomorphism. A `RelIso r s` is an equivalence `f : α ≃ β` such that
`r a b ↔ s (f a) (f b)`.
* `sumLexCongr`, `prodLexCongr`: Creates a relation homomorphism between two `Sum.Lex` or two
`Prod.Lex` from relation homomorphisms between their arguments.
## Notation
* `→r`: `RelHom`
* `↪r`: `RelEmbedding`
* `≃r`: `RelIso`
-/
open Function
universe u v w
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop} {u : δ → δ → Prop}
/-- A relation homomorphism with respect to a given pair of relations `r` and `s`
is a function `f : α → β` such that `r a b → s (f a) (f b)`. -/
structure RelHom {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) where
/-- The underlying function of a `RelHom` -/
toFun : α → β
/-- A `RelHom` sends related elements to related elements -/
map_rel' : ∀ {a b}, r a b → s (toFun a) (toFun b)
/-- A relation homomorphism with respect to a given pair of relations `r` and `s`
is a function `f : α → β` such that `r a b → s (f a) (f b)`. -/
infixl:25 " →r " => RelHom
section
/-- `RelHomClass F r s` asserts that `F` is a type of functions such that all `f : F`
satisfy `r a b → s (f a) (f b)`.
The relations `r` and `s` are `outParam`s since figuring them out from a goal is a higher-order
matching problem that Lean usually can't do unaided.
-/
class RelHomClass (F : Type*) {α β : outParam Type*} (r : outParam <| α → α → Prop)
(s : outParam <| β → β → Prop) [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- A `RelHomClass` sends related elements to related elements -/
map_rel : ∀ (f : F) {a b}, r a b → s (f a) (f b)
export RelHomClass (map_rel)
end
namespace RelHomClass
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β]
protected theorem isIrrefl [RelHomClass F r s] (f : F) : ∀ [IsIrrefl β s], IsIrrefl α r
| ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ h => H _ (map_rel f h)⟩
protected theorem isAsymm [RelHomClass F r s] (f : F) : ∀ [IsAsymm β s], IsAsymm α r
| ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ h₁ h₂ => H _ _ (map_rel f h₁) (map_rel f h₂)⟩
protected theorem acc [RelHomClass F r s] (f : F) (a : α) : Acc s (f a) → Acc r a := by
generalize h : f a = b
intro ac
induction ac generalizing a with | intro _ H IH => ?_
subst h
exact ⟨_, fun a' h => IH (f a') (map_rel f h) _ rfl⟩
protected theorem wellFounded [RelHomClass F r s] (f : F) : WellFounded s → WellFounded r
| ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ => RelHomClass.acc f _ (H _)⟩
protected theorem isWellFounded [RelHomClass F r s] (f : F) [IsWellFounded β s] :
IsWellFounded α r :=
⟨RelHomClass.wellFounded f IsWellFounded.wf⟩
end RelHomClass
namespace RelHom
instance : FunLike (r →r s) α β where
coe o := o.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
instance : RelHomClass (r →r s) r s where
map_rel := map_rel'
initialize_simps_projections RelHom (toFun → apply)
protected theorem map_rel (f : r →r s) {a b} : r a b → s (f a) (f b) :=
f.map_rel'
@[simp]
theorem coe_fn_toFun (f : r →r s) : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
/-- The map `coe_fn : (r →r s) → (α → β)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : Injective fun (f : r →r s) => (f : α → β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : r →r s⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Identity map is a relation homomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
protected def id (r : α → α → Prop) : r →r r :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x⟩
/-- Composition of two relation homomorphisms is a relation homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def comp (g : s →r t) (f : r →r s) : r →r t :=
⟨fun x => g (f x), fun h => g.2 (f.2 h)⟩
/-- A relation homomorphism is also a relation homomorphism between dual relations. -/
protected def swap (f : r →r s) : swap r →r swap s :=
⟨f, f.map_rel⟩
/-- A function is a relation homomorphism from the preimage relation of `s` to `s`. -/
def preimage (f : α → β) (s : β → β → Prop) : f ⁻¹'o s →r s :=
⟨f, id⟩
end RelHom
/-- An increasing function is injective -/
theorem injective_of_increasing (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsTrichotomous α r]
[IsIrrefl β s] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, r x y → s (f x) (f y)) : Injective f := by
intro x y hxy
rcases trichotomous_of r x y with (h | h | h)
· have := hf h
rw [hxy] at this
exfalso
exact irrefl_of s (f y) this
· exact h
· have := hf h
rw [hxy] at this
exfalso
exact irrefl_of s (f y) this
/-- An increasing function is injective -/
theorem RelHom.injective_of_increasing [IsTrichotomous α r] [IsIrrefl β s] (f : r →r s) :
Injective f :=
_root_.injective_of_increasing r s f f.map_rel
theorem Function.Surjective.wellFounded_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f)
(o : ∀ {a b}, r a b ↔ s (f a) (f b)) :
WellFounded r ↔ WellFounded s :=
Iff.intro
(RelHomClass.wellFounded (⟨surjInv hf,
fun h => by simpa only [o, surjInv_eq hf] using h⟩ : s →r r))
(RelHomClass.wellFounded (⟨f, o.1⟩ : r →r s))
/-- A relation embedding with respect to a given pair of relations `r` and `s`
is an embedding `f : α ↪ β` such that `r a b ↔ s (f a) (f b)`. -/
structure RelEmbedding {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends α ↪ β where
/-- Elements are related iff they are related after apply a `RelEmbedding` -/
map_rel_iff' : ∀ {a b}, s (toEmbedding a) (toEmbedding b) ↔ r a b
/-- A relation embedding with respect to a given pair of relations `r` and `s`
is an embedding `f : α ↪ β` such that `r a b ↔ s (f a) (f b)`. -/
infixl:25 " ↪r " => RelEmbedding
/-- The induced relation on a subtype is an embedding under the natural inclusion. -/
def Subtype.relEmbedding {X : Type*} (r : X → X → Prop) (p : X → Prop) :
(Subtype.val : Subtype p → X) ⁻¹'o r ↪r r :=
⟨Embedding.subtype p, Iff.rfl⟩
theorem preimage_equivalence {α β} (f : α → β) {s : β → β → Prop} (hs : Equivalence s) :
Equivalence (f ⁻¹'o s) :=
⟨fun _ => hs.1 _, fun h => hs.2 h, fun h₁ h₂ => hs.3 h₁ h₂⟩
namespace RelEmbedding
/-- A relation embedding is also a relation homomorphism -/
def toRelHom (f : r ↪r s) : r →r s where
toFun := f.toEmbedding.toFun
map_rel' := (map_rel_iff' f).mpr
instance : Coe (r ↪r s) (r →r s) :=
⟨toRelHom⟩
-- TODO: define and instantiate a `RelEmbeddingClass` when `EmbeddingLike` is defined
instance : FunLike (r ↪r s) α β where
coe x := x.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
-- TODO: define and instantiate a `RelEmbeddingClass` when `EmbeddingLike` is defined
instance : RelHomClass (r ↪r s) r s where
map_rel f _ _ := Iff.mpr (map_rel_iff' f)
initialize_simps_projections RelEmbedding (toFun → apply)
instance : EmbeddingLike (r ↪r s) α β where
injective' f := f.inj'
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEmbedding {f : r ↪r s} : ((f : r ↪r s).toEmbedding : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toRelHom {f : r ↪r s} : ((f : r ↪r s).toRelHom : α → β) = f :=
rfl
theorem toEmbedding_injective : Injective (toEmbedding : r ↪r s → (α ↪ β)) := by
rintro ⟨f, -⟩ ⟨g, -⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem toEmbedding_inj {f g : r ↪r s} : f.toEmbedding = g.toEmbedding ↔ f = g :=
toEmbedding_injective.eq_iff
theorem injective (f : r ↪r s) : Injective f :=
f.inj'
theorem inj (f : r ↪r s) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := f.injective.eq_iff
theorem map_rel_iff (f : r ↪r s) {a b} : s (f a) (f b) ↔ r a b :=
f.map_rel_iff'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {f} {h} : ⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : r ↪r s) = f :=
rfl
/-- The map `coe_fn : (r ↪r s) → (α → β)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : Injective fun f : r ↪r s => (f : α → β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : r ↪r s⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
/-- Identity map is a relation embedding. -/
@[refl, simps!]
protected def refl (r : α → α → Prop) : r ↪r r :=
⟨Embedding.refl _, Iff.rfl⟩
/-- Composition of two relation embeddings is a relation embedding. -/
protected def trans (f : r ↪r s) (g : s ↪r t) : r ↪r t :=
⟨f.1.trans g.1, by simp [f.map_rel_iff, g.map_rel_iff]⟩
instance (r : α → α → Prop) : Inhabited (r ↪r r) :=
⟨RelEmbedding.refl _⟩
theorem trans_apply (f : r ↪r s) (g : s ↪r t) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (f : r ↪r s) (g : s ↪r t) : (f.trans g) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
/-- A relation embedding is also a relation embedding between dual relations. -/
protected def swap (f : r ↪r s) : swap r ↪r swap s :=
⟨f.toEmbedding, f.map_rel_iff⟩
/-- If `f` is injective, then it is a relation embedding from the
preimage relation of `s` to `s`. -/
def preimage (f : α ↪ β) (s : β → β → Prop) : f ⁻¹'o s ↪r s :=
⟨f, Iff.rfl⟩
theorem eq_preimage (f : r ↪r s) : r = f ⁻¹'o s := by
ext a b
exact f.map_rel_iff.symm
protected theorem isIrrefl (f : r ↪r s) [IsIrrefl β s] : IsIrrefl α r :=
⟨fun a => mt f.map_rel_iff.2 (irrefl (f a))⟩
protected theorem isRefl (f : r ↪r s) [IsRefl β s] : IsRefl α r :=
⟨fun _ => f.map_rel_iff.1 <| refl _⟩
protected theorem isSymm (f : r ↪r s) [IsSymm β s] : IsSymm α r :=
⟨fun _ _ => imp_imp_imp f.map_rel_iff.2 f.map_rel_iff.1 symm⟩
protected theorem isAsymm (f : r ↪r s) [IsAsymm β s] : IsAsymm α r :=
⟨fun _ _ h₁ h₂ => asymm (f.map_rel_iff.2 h₁) (f.map_rel_iff.2 h₂)⟩
protected theorem isAntisymm : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsAntisymm β s], IsAntisymm α r
| ⟨f, o⟩, ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ h₁ h₂ => f.inj' (H _ _ (o.2 h₁) (o.2 h₂))⟩
protected theorem isTrans : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsTrans β s], IsTrans α r
| ⟨_, o⟩, ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => o.1 (H _ _ _ (o.2 h₁) (o.2 h₂))⟩
protected theorem isTotal : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsTotal β s], IsTotal α r
| ⟨_, o⟩, ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => (or_congr o o).1 (H _ _)⟩
protected theorem isPreorder : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsPreorder β s], IsPreorder α r
| f, _ => { f.isRefl, f.isTrans with }
protected theorem isPartialOrder : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsPartialOrder β s], IsPartialOrder α r
| f, _ => { f.isPreorder, f.isAntisymm with }
protected theorem isLinearOrder : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsLinearOrder β s], IsLinearOrder α r
| f, _ => { f.isPartialOrder, f.isTotal with }
protected theorem isStrictOrder : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsStrictOrder β s], IsStrictOrder α r
| f, _ => { f.isIrrefl, f.isTrans with }
| protected theorem isTrichotomous : ∀ (_ : r ↪r s) [IsTrichotomous β s], IsTrichotomous α r
| ⟨f, o⟩, ⟨H⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => (or_congr o (or_congr f.inj'.eq_iff o)).1 (H _ _)⟩
| Mathlib/Order/RelIso/Basic.lean | 319 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : #σ.support < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_mul {f g : Perm α} (h : f.Disjoint g) :
(f * g).cycleType = f.cycleType + g.cycleType := by
simp only [Perm.cycleType]
rw [h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union]
simp only [Finset.union_val, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _, Multiset.map_add]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_val, Disjoint.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j))
(hs' : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j) :=
hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute)) :
(s.noncommProd k hs').cycleType = s.sum fun i ↦ (k i).cycleType := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.sum_insert hi]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rwa [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, Multiset.singleton_inj] at h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : #σ.support ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
theorem isConj_iff_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.cycleType = τ.cycleType :=
⟨fun h => by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 h
rw [cycleType_conj], isConj_of_cycleType_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_extendDomain {β : Type*} [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] {p : β → Prop}
[DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
cycleType (g.extendDomain f) = cycleType g := by
induction g using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => rw [extendDomain_one, cycleType_one, cycleType_one]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
rw [(hσ.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ.cycleType, card_support_extend_domain]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ =>
rw [hd.cycleType, ← extendDomain_mul, (hd.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ, hτ]
theorem cycleType_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {g : Perm (Subtype p)} :
cycleType (ofSubtype g) = cycleType g :=
cycleType_extendDomain (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
theorem mem_cycleType_iff {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} :
n ∈ cycleType σ ↔ ∃ c τ, σ = c * τ ∧ Disjoint c τ ∧ IsCycle c ∧ c.support.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hlc, hld⟩ := truncCycleFactors σ
rw [cycleType_eq _ rfl hlc hld, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨c, cl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [(List.perm_cons_erase cl).pairwise_iff @(Disjoint.symmetric)] at hld
refine ⟨c, (l.erase c).prod, ?_, ?_, hlc _ cl, rfl⟩
· rw [← List.prod_cons, (List.perm_cons_erase cl).symm.prod_eq' (hld.imp Disjoint.commute)]
· exact disjoint_prod_right _ fun g => List.rel_of_pairwise_cons hld
· rintro ⟨c, t, rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩
simp [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType]
theorem le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} (h : n ∈ cycleType σ) :
n ≤ #σ.support :=
(le_sum_of_mem h).trans (le_of_eq σ.sum_cycleType)
theorem cycleType_of_card_le_mem_cycleType_add_two {n : ℕ} {g : Perm α}
(hn2 : Fintype.card α < n + 2) (hng : n ∈ g.cycleType) : g.cycleType = {n} := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 hng
suffices g'1 : g' = 1 by
rw [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType, g'1, cycleType_one, add_zero]
contrapose! hn2 with g'1
apply le_trans _ (c * g').support.card_le_univ
rw [hd.card_support_mul]
exact add_le_add_left (two_le_card_support_of_ne_one g'1) _
end CycleType
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
open Function in
/-- The number of fixed points of a `p ^ n`-th root of the identity function over a finite set
and the set's cardinality have the same residue modulo `p`, where `p` is a prime. -/
theorem card_fixedPoints_modEq [DecidableEq α] {f : Function.End α} {p n : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hf : f ^ p ^ n = 1) :
Fintype.card α ≡ Fintype.card f.fixedPoints [MOD p] := by
let σ : α ≃ α := ⟨f, f ^ (p ^ n - 1),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_sub_mul_pow f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_mul_pow_sub f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf)⟩
have hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1 := by
rw [DFunLike.ext'_iff, coe_pow]
exact (hom_coe_pow (fun g : Function.End α ↦ g) rfl (fun g h ↦ rfl) f (p ^ n)).symm.trans hf
suffices Fintype.card f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ.card from
this ▸ (card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm
suffices f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ by
simp only [this]; apply Fintype.card_coe
simp [σ, Set.ext_iff, IsFixedPt]
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : ¬p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : ∃ a : α, σ a = a := by
classical
| contrapose! hα
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hα
exact Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((congr_arg _ (Finset.card_eq_zero.2 (compl_eq_bot.2 hα))).mp
(card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 377 | 381 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
| theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 511 | 514 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.SubboxInduction
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Tagged
/-!
# Induction on subboxes
In this file we prove (see
`BoxIntegral.Box.exists_taggedPartition_isHenstock_isSubordinate_homothetic`) that for every box `I`
in `ℝⁿ` and a function `r : ℝⁿ → ℝ` positive on `I` there exists a tagged partition `π` of `I` such
that
* `π` is a Henstock partition;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* each box in `π` is homothetic to `I` with coefficient of the form `1 / 2 ^ n`.
Later we will use this lemma to prove that the Henstock filter is nontrivial, hence the Henstock
integral is well-defined.
## Tags
partition, tagged partition, Henstock integral
-/
namespace BoxIntegral
open Set Metric
open Topology
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I J : Box ι}
namespace Prepartition
/-- Split a box in `ℝⁿ` into `2 ^ n` boxes by hyperplanes passing through its center. -/
def splitCenter (I : Box ι) : Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.univ.map (Box.splitCenterBoxEmb I)
le_of_mem' := by simp [I.splitCenterBox_le]
pairwiseDisjoint := by
rw [Finset.coe_map, Finset.coe_univ, image_univ]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩ Hne
exact I.disjoint_splitCenterBox (mt (congr_arg _) Hne)
@[simp]
theorem mem_splitCenter : J ∈ splitCenter I ↔ ∃ s, I.splitCenterBox s = J := by simp [splitCenter]
theorem isPartition_splitCenter (I : Box ι) : IsPartition (splitCenter I) := fun x hx => by
simp [hx]
theorem upper_sub_lower_of_mem_splitCenter (h : J ∈ splitCenter I) (i : ι) :
J.upper i - J.lower i = (I.upper i - I.lower i) / 2 :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_splitCenter.1 h
hs ▸ I.upper_sub_lower_splitCenterBox s i
end Prepartition
namespace Box
open Prepartition TaggedPrepartition
/-- Let `p` be a predicate on `Box ι`, let `I` be a box. Suppose that the following two properties
hold true.
* Consider a smaller box `J ≤ I`. The hyperplanes passing through the center of `J` split it into
`2 ^ n` boxes. If `p` holds true on each of these boxes, then it true on `J`.
* For each `z` in the closed box `I.Icc` there exists a neighborhood `U` of `z` within `I.Icc` such
that for every box `J ≤ I` such that `z ∈ J.Icc ⊆ U`, if `J` is homothetic to `I` with a
coefficient of the form `1 / 2 ^ m`, then `p` is true on `J`.
Then `p I` is true. See also `BoxIntegral.Box.subbox_induction_on'` for a version using
`BoxIntegral.Box.splitCenterBox` instead of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitCenter`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem subbox_induction_on {p : Box ι → Prop} (I : Box ι)
(H_ind : ∀ J ≤ I, (∀ J' ∈ splitCenter J, p J') → p J)
(H_nhds : ∀ z ∈ Box.Icc I, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝[Box.Icc I] z, ∀ J ≤ I, ∀ (m : ℕ),
z ∈ Box.Icc J → Box.Icc J ⊆ U →
(∀ i, J.upper i - J.lower i = (I.upper i - I.lower i) / 2 ^ m) → p J) :
p I := by
refine subbox_induction_on' I (fun J hle hs => H_ind J hle fun J' h' => ?_) H_nhds
| rcases mem_splitCenter.1 h' with ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact hs s
/-- Given a box `I` in `ℝⁿ` and a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)`, there exists a tagged partition `π` of
`I` such that
* `π` is a Henstock partition;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* each box in `π` is homothetic to `I` with coefficient of the form `1 / 2 ^ m`.
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/SubboxInduction.lean | 87 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DegreeSum
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Lemma
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Triangle.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Triangle.Counting
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.CastCard
/-!
# Triangle removal lemma
In this file, we prove the triangle removal lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Nat SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {G : SimpleGraph α} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{s t : Finset α} {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)} {ε : ℝ}
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- An explicit form for the constant in the triangle removal lemma.
Note that this depends on `SzemerediRegularity.bound`, which is a tower-type exponential. This means
`triangleRemovalBound` is in practice absolutely tiny. -/
noncomputable def triangleRemovalBound (ε : ℝ) : ℝ :=
min (2 * ⌈4/ε⌉₊^3)⁻¹ ((1 - ε/4) * (ε/(16 * bound (ε/8) ⌈4/ε⌉₊))^3)
lemma triangleRemovalBound_pos (hε : 0 < ε) (hε₁ : ε ≤ 1) : 0 < triangleRemovalBound ε := by
have : 0 < 1 - ε / 4 := by linarith
unfold triangleRemovalBound
positivity
lemma triangleRemovalBound_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : triangleRemovalBound ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [triangleRemovalBound, ceil_eq_zero.2 (div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos _ hε)] <;> simp
|
lemma triangleRemovalBound_mul_cube_lt (hε : 0 < ε) :
triangleRemovalBound ε * ⌈4 / ε⌉₊ ^ 3 < 1 := by
calc
_ ≤ (2 * ⌈4 / ε⌉₊ ^ 3 : ℝ)⁻¹ * ↑⌈4 / ε⌉₊ ^ 3 := by gcongr; exact min_le_left _ _
_ = 2⁻¹ := by rw [mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right₀]; positivity
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Triangle/Removal.lean | 43 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.WithDensity
/-!
# Radon-Nikodym derivative and Lebesgue decomposition for kernels
Let `α` and `γ` be two measurable space, where either `α` is countable or `γ` is
countably generated. Let `κ, η : Kernel α γ` be finite kernels.
Then there exists a function `Kernel.rnDeriv κ η : α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
and a kernel `Kernel.singularPart κ η : Kernel α γ` such that
* `κ = Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a = 0 ↔ κ a ≪ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) a = 0 ↔ κ a ⟂ₘ η a`.
Furthermore, the sets `{a | κ a ≪ η a}` and `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}` are measurable.
When `γ` is countably generated, the construction of the derivative starts from `Kernel.density`:
for two finite kernels `κ' : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `η' : Kernel α γ` with `fst κ' ≤ η'`,
the function `density κ' η' : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` is jointly measurable in the first two arguments
and satisfies that for all `a : α` and all measurable sets `s : Set β` and `A : Set γ`,
`∫ x in A, density κ' η' a x s ∂(η' a) = (κ' a (A ×ˢ s)).toReal`.
We use that definition for `β = Unit` and `κ' = map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))`. We can't choose `η' = η`
in general because we might not have `κ ≤ η`, but if we could, we would get a measurable function
`f` with the property `κ = withDensity η f`, which is the decomposition we want for `κ ≤ η`.
To circumvent that difficulty, we take `η' = κ + η` and thus define `rnDerivAux κ η`.
Finally, `rnDeriv κ η a x` is given by
`ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) / ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)`.
Up to some conversions between `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`, the singular part is
`withDensity (κ + η) (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) - (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)) * rnDeriv κ η)`.
The countably generated measurable space assumption is not needed to have a decomposition for
measures, but the additional difficulty with kernels is to obtain joint measurability of the
derivative. This is why we can't simply define `rnDeriv κ η` by `a ↦ (κ a).rnDeriv (ν a)`
everywhere unless `α` is countable (although `rnDeriv κ η` has that value almost everywhere).
See the construction of `Kernel.density` for details on how the countably generated hypothesis
is used.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv`: a function `α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`: a `Kernel α γ`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.mutuallySingular_singularPart`: for all `a : α`,
`Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv_add_singularPart`:
`Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η = κ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_absolutelyContinuous` : the set `{a | κ a ≪ η a}`
is Measurable
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_mutuallySingular` : the set `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}`
is Measurable
Uniqueness results: if `κ = η.withDensity f + ξ` for measurable `f` and `ξ` is such that
`ξ a ⟂ₘ η a` for some `a : α` then
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_rnDeriv`: `f a =ᵐ[η a] Kernel.rnDeriv κ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_singularPart`: `ξ a = Kernel.singularPart κ η a`
## References
Theorem 1.28 in [O. Kallenberg, Random Measures, Theory and Applications][kallenberg2017].
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter ENNReal
open scoped NNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {κ η : Kernel α γ}
[hαγ : MeasurableSpace.CountableOrCountablyGenerated α γ]
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary function used to define `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv` and
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`.
This has the properties we want for a Radon-Nikodym derivative only if `κ ≪ ν`. The definition of
`rnDeriv κ η` will be built from `rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)`. -/
noncomputable
def rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) : ℝ :=
if hα : Countable α then ((κ a).rnDeriv (η a) x).toReal
else haveI := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
density (map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))) η a x univ
lemma rnDerivAux_nonneg (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} {x : γ} : 0 ≤ rnDerivAux κ η a x := by
rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· exact ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_nonneg ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
lemma rnDerivAux_le_one [IsFiniteKernel η] (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} :
rnDerivAux κ η a ≤ᵐ[η a] 1 := by
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_le_one_of_le (hκη a)] with x hx_le_one
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal zero_le_one ?_
simp only [Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
exact hx_le_one
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_le_one ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
Measurable (fun p : α × γ ↦ Kernel.rnDerivAux κ η p.1 p.2) := by
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_
change Measurable ((fun q : γ × α ↦ (κ q.2).rnDeriv (η q.2) q.1) ∘ Prod.swap)
refine (measurable_from_prod_countable' (fun a ↦ ?_) ?_).comp measurable_swap
· exact Measure.measurable_rnDeriv (κ a) (η a)
· intro a a' c ha'_mem_a
have h_eq : ∀ κ : Kernel α γ, κ a' = κ a := fun κ ↦ by
ext s hs
exact mem_of_mem_measurableAtom ha'_mem_a
(Kernel.measurable_coe κ hs (measurableSet_singleton (κ a s))) rfl
rw [h_eq κ, h_eq η]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact measurable_density _ η MeasurableSet.univ
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux_right (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x : γ ↦ rnDerivAux κ η a x) := by fun_prop
lemma setLIntegral_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η]
(a : α) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
| ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) ∂(κ + η) a = κ a s := by
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· have h_ac : κ a ≪ (κ + η) a := Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le (h_le a)
rw [← Measure.setLIntegral_rnDeriv h_ac]
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hs ?_
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top (κ a) ((κ + η) a)] with x hx_lt _
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal hx_lt.ne]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
rw [setLIntegral_density ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le h_le) _
MeasurableSet.univ hs, map_apply' _ (by fun_prop) _ (hs.prod MeasurableSet.univ)]
congr with x
simp
lemma withDensity_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/RadonNikodym.lean | 134 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE (ℤ√d) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
| · have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 589 | 590 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Properties
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines the conversion between bilinear forms and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toBilin` given a basis define a bilinear form
* `Matrix.toBilin'` define the bilinear form on `n → R`
* `BilinForm.toMatrix`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form
* `BilinForm.toMatrix'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form on `n → R`
## Notations
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M₁` is a module over the commutative semiring `R₁`,
- `M₂` is a module over the commutative ring `R₂`.
## Tags
bilinear form, bilin form, BilinearForm, matrix, basis
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {R₂ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
section Matrix
variable {n o : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear forms on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toBilin'`. -/
def Matrix.toBilin'Aux [Fintype n] (M : Matrix n n R₁) : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux _ _ M
theorem Matrix.toBilin'Aux_single [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix n n R₁) (i j : n) :
M.toBilin'Aux (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single _ _ _ _ _
/-- The linear map from bilinear forms to `Matrix n n R` given an `n`-indexed basis.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toBilin'`. -/
def BilinForm.toMatrixAux (b : n → M₁) : BilinForm R₁ M₁ →ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁ :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R₁ b b
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.BilinForm.toMatrixAux_apply (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (b : n → M₁) (i j : n) :
BilinForm.toMatrixAux b B i j = B (b i) (b j) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply R₁ B _ _ _ _
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype o]
theorem toBilin'Aux_toMatrixAux [DecidableEq n] (B₂ : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) :
Matrix.toBilin'Aux (BilinForm.toMatrixAux (fun j => Pi.single j 1) B₂) = B₂ := by
rw [BilinForm.toMatrixAux, Matrix.toBilin'Aux, toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux]
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### `ToMatrix'` section
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R₂`.
-/
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq o]
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear forms on `n → R` and `n × n` matrices -/
def LinearMap.BilinForm.toMatrix' : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) ≃ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁ :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R₁
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R` -/
| def Matrix.toBilin' : Matrix n n R₁ ≃ₗ[R₁] BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) :=
BilinForm.toMatrix'.symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin'Aux_eq (M : Matrix n n R₁) : Matrix.toBilin'Aux M = Matrix.toBilin' M :=
rfl
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/BilinearForm.lean | 88 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Units
/-!
# Ordered monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines morphisms between (additive) ordered monoids.
## Types of morphisms
* `OrderAddMonoidHom`: Ordered additive monoid homomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidHom`: Ordered monoid homomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`: Ordered monoid with zero homomorphisms.
* `OrderAddMonoidIso`: Ordered additive monoid isomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidIso`: Ordered monoid isomorphisms.
## Notation
* `→+o`: Bundled ordered additive monoid homs. Also use for additive group homs.
* `→*o`: Bundled ordered monoid homs. Also use for group homs.
* `→*₀o`: Bundled ordered monoid with zero homs. Also use for group with zero homs.
* `≃+o`: Bundled ordered additive monoid isos. Also use for additive group isos.
* `≃*o`: Bundled ordered monoid isos. Also use for group isos.
* `≃*₀o`: Bundled ordered monoid with zero isos. Also use for group with zero isos.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical notation is to use the bundled hom as
a function via this coercion.
There is no `OrderGroupHom` -- the idea is that `OrderMonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `OrderMonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well as `map_mul`; a separate
constructor `OrderMonoidHom.mk'` will construct ordered group homs (i.e. ordered monoid homs
between ordered groups) given only a proof that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `OrderMonoidHom`. When
they can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
### Removed typeclasses
This file used to define typeclasses for order-preserving (additive) monoid homomorphisms:
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass`, `OrderMonoidHomClass`, and `OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass`.
In https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10544 we migrated from these typeclasses
to assumptions like `[FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N]`,
making some definitions and lemmas irrelevant.
## Tags
ordered monoid, ordered group, monoid with zero
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
section AddMonoid
/-- `α →+o β` is the type of monotone functions `α → β` that preserve the `OrderedAddCommMonoid`
structure.
`OrderAddMonoidHom` is also used for ordered group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →+o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderAddMonoidHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α]
[AddZeroClass β] extends α →+ β where
/-- An `OrderAddMonoidHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderAddMonoidHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →+o " => OrderAddMonoidHom
/-- `α ≃+o β` is the type of monotone isomorphisms `α ≃ β` that preserve the `OrderedAddCommMonoid`
structure.
`OrderAddMonoidIso` is also used for ordered group isomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α ≃+o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [AddEquivClass F M N] [OrderIsoClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderAddMonoidIso (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Add α] [Add β]
extends α ≃+ β where
/-- An `OrderAddMonoidIso` respects `≤`. -/
map_le_map_iff' {a b : α} : toFun a ≤ toFun b ↔ a ≤ b
/-- Infix notation for `OrderAddMonoidIso`. -/
infixr:25 " ≃+o " => OrderAddMonoidIso
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end AddMonoid
section Monoid
/-- `α →*o β` is the type of functions `α → β` that preserve the `OrderedCommMonoid` structure.
`OrderMonoidHom` is also used for ordered group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →*o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure OrderMonoidHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α]
[MulOneClass β] extends α →* β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →*o " => OrderMonoidHom
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `MonoidHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →*o β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `AddMonoidHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderAddMonoidHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →+o β`."]
def OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
α →*o β :=
{ (f : α →* β) with monotone' := OrderHomClass.monotone f }
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidHom` via
`OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidHom` via
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass.toOrderAddMonoidHom`"]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom⟩
/-- `α ≃*o β` is the type of isomorphisms `α ≃ β` that preserve the `OrderedCommMonoid` structure.
`OrderMonoidIso` is also used for ordered group isomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α ≃*o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] [OrderIsoClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure OrderMonoidIso (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Mul α] [Mul β]
extends α ≃* β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidIso` respects `≤`. -/
map_le_map_iff' {a b : α} : toFun a ≤ toFun b ↔ a ≤ b
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidIso`. -/
infixr:25 " ≃*o " => OrderMonoidIso
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderIsoClass F α β` and `MulEquivClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidIso`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃*o β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderIsoClass F α β` and `AddEquivClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderAddMonoidIso`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃+o β`."]
def OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
[MulEquivClass F α β] (f : F) :
α ≃*o β :=
{ (f : α ≃* β) with map_le_map_iff' := OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f }
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidHom` via
`OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidHom` via
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass.toOrderAddMonoidHom`"]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom⟩
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidIsoClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidIso` via
`OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidIsoClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidIso` via
`OrderAddMonoidIsoClass.toOrderAddMonoidIso`"]
instance [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso⟩
end Monoid
section MonoidWithZero
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulZeroOneClass α] [MulZeroOneClass β]
/-- `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom α β` is the type of functions `α → β` that preserve
the `MonoidWithZero` structure.
`OrderMonoidWithZeroHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →+ β)`,
you should parameterize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderMonoidWithZeroHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulZeroOneClass α]
[MulZeroOneClass β] extends α →*₀ β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →*₀o " => OrderMonoidWithZeroHom
section
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F`
satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →+*₀o β`. -/
@[coe]
def OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass.toOrderMonoidWithZeroHom [OrderHomClass F α β]
[MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] (f : F) : α →*₀o β :=
{ (f : α →*₀ β) with monotone' := OrderHomClass.monotone f }
end
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*₀o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass.toOrderMonoidWithZeroHom⟩
end MonoidWithZero
section OrderedZero
variable [FunLike F α β]
variable [Preorder α] [Zero α] [Preorder β] [Zero β] [OrderHomClass F α β]
[ZeroHomClass F α β] (f : F) {a : α}
/-- See also `NonnegHomClass.apply_nonneg`. -/
theorem map_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ f a := by
rw [← map_zero f]
exact OrderHomClass.mono _ ha
theorem map_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : f a ≤ 0 := by
rw [← map_zero f]
exact OrderHomClass.mono _ ha
end OrderedZero
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
[AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [i : FunLike F α β]
variable (f : F)
theorem monotone_iff_map_nonneg [iamhc : AddMonoidHomClass F α β] :
Monotone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ f a :=
⟨fun h a => by
rw [← map_zero f]
apply h, fun h a b hl => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel b a, map_add f]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (h _ <| sub_nonneg.2 hl)⟩
variable [iamhc : AddMonoidHomClass F α β]
theorem antitone_iff_map_nonpos : Antitone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 ≤ a → f a ≤ 0 :=
monotone_toDual_comp_iff.symm.trans <| monotone_iff_map_nonneg (β := βᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem monotone_iff_map_nonpos : Monotone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a ≤ 0, f a ≤ 0 :=
antitone_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| antitone_iff_map_nonpos (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem antitone_iff_map_nonneg : Antitone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a ≤ 0, 0 ≤ f a :=
monotone_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| monotone_iff_map_nonneg (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictMono_iff_map_pos :
StrictMono (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 < a → 0 < f a := by
refine ⟨fun h a => ?_, fun h a b hl => ?_⟩
· rw [← map_zero f]
apply h
· rw [← sub_add_cancel b a, map_add f]
exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (h _ <| sub_pos.2 hl)
theorem strictAnti_iff_map_neg : StrictAnti (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 < a → f a < 0 :=
strictMono_toDual_comp_iff.symm.trans <| strictMono_iff_map_pos (β := βᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictMono_iff_map_neg : StrictMono (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a < 0, f a < 0 :=
strictAnti_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| strictAnti_iff_map_neg (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictAnti_iff_map_pos : StrictAnti (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a < 0, 0 < f a :=
strictMono_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| strictMono_iff_map_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
end OrderedAddCommGroup
namespace OrderMonoidHom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β]
[MulOneClass γ] [MulOneClass δ] {f g : α →*o β}
@[to_additive]
instance : FunLike (α →*o β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
initialize_simps_projections OrderAddMonoidHom (toFun → apply, -toAddMonoidHom)
initialize_simps_projections OrderMonoidHom (toFun → apply, -toMonoidHom)
@[to_additive]
instance : OrderHomClass (α →*o β) α β where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[to_additive]
instance : MonoidHomClass (α →*o β) α β where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
| -- Other lemmas should be accessed through the `FunLike` API
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Hom/Monoid.lean | 314 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Flow
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
/-!
# ω-limits
For a function `ϕ : τ → α → β` where `β` is a topological space, we
define the ω-limit under `ϕ` of a set `s` in `α` with respect to
filter `f` on `τ`: an element `y : β` is in the ω-limit of `s` if the
forward images of `s` intersect arbitrarily small neighbourhoods of
`y` frequently "in the direction of `f`".
In practice `ϕ` is often a continuous monoid-act, but the definition
requires only that `ϕ` has a coercion to the appropriate function
type. In the case where `τ` is `ℕ` or `ℝ` and `f` is `atTop`, we
recover the usual definition of the ω-limit set as the set of all `y`
such that there exist sequences `(tₙ)`, `(xₙ)` such that `ϕ tₙ xₙ ⟶ y`
as `n ⟶ ∞`.
## Notations
The `omegaLimit` locale provides the localised notation `ω` for
`omegaLimit`, as well as `ω⁺` and `ω⁻` for `omegaLimit atTop` and
`omegaLimit atBot` respectively for when the acting monoid is
endowed with an order.
-/
open Set Function Filter Topology
/-!
### Definition and notation
-/
section omegaLimit
variable {τ : Type*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
/-- The ω-limit of a set `s` under `ϕ` with respect to a filter `f` is `⋂ u ∈ f, cl (ϕ u s)`. -/
def omegaLimit [TopologicalSpace β] (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : τ → α → β) (s : Set α) : Set β :=
⋂ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω" => omegaLimit
/-- The ω-limit w.r.t. `Filter.atTop`. -/
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω⁺" => omegaLimit Filter.atTop
/-- The ω-limit w.r.t. `Filter.atBot`. -/
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω⁻" => omegaLimit Filter.atBot
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : τ → α → β) (s s₁ s₂ : Set α)
/-!
### Elementary properties
-/
open omegaLimit
theorem omegaLimit_def : ω f ϕ s = ⋂ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s) := rfl
theorem omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto {m : τ → τ} {f₁ f₂ : Filter τ} (hf : Tendsto m f₁ f₂) :
ω f₁ (fun t x ↦ ϕ (m t) x) s ⊆ ω f₂ ϕ s := by
refine iInter₂_mono' fun u hu ↦ ⟨m ⁻¹' u, tendsto_def.mp hf _ hu, ?_⟩
rw [← image2_image_left]
exact closure_mono (image2_subset (image_preimage_subset _ _) Subset.rfl)
theorem omegaLimit_mono_left {f₁ f₂ : Filter τ} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : ω f₁ ϕ s ⊆ ω f₂ ϕ s :=
omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto ϕ s (tendsto_id'.2 hf)
theorem omegaLimit_mono_right {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : ω f ϕ s₁ ⊆ ω f ϕ s₂ :=
iInter₂_mono fun _u _hu ↦ closure_mono (image2_subset Subset.rfl hs)
theorem isClosed_omegaLimit : IsClosed (ω f ϕ s) :=
isClosed_iInter fun _u ↦ isClosed_iInter fun _hu ↦ isClosed_closure
theorem mapsTo_omegaLimit' {α' β' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β'] {f : Filter τ} {ϕ : τ → α → β}
{ϕ' : τ → α' → β'} {ga : α → α'} {s' : Set α'} (hs : MapsTo ga s s') {gb : β → β'}
(hg : ∀ᶠ t in f, EqOn (gb ∘ ϕ t) (ϕ' t ∘ ga) s) (hgc : Continuous gb) :
MapsTo gb (ω f ϕ s) (ω f ϕ' s') := by
simp only [omegaLimit_def, mem_iInter, MapsTo]
intro y hy u hu
refine map_mem_closure hgc (hy _ (inter_mem hu hg)) (forall_mem_image2.2 fun t ht x hx ↦ ?_)
calc
ϕ' t (ga x) ∈ image2 ϕ' u s' := mem_image2_of_mem ht.1 (hs hx)
_ = gb (ϕ t x) := ht.2 hx |>.symm
theorem mapsTo_omegaLimit {α' β' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β'] {f : Filter τ} {ϕ : τ → α → β}
{ϕ' : τ → α' → β'} {ga : α → α'} {s' : Set α'} (hs : MapsTo ga s s') {gb : β → β'}
(hg : ∀ t x, gb (ϕ t x) = ϕ' t (ga x)) (hgc : Continuous gb) :
MapsTo gb (ω f ϕ s) (ω f ϕ' s') :=
mapsTo_omegaLimit' _ hs (Eventually.of_forall fun t x _hx ↦ hg t x) hgc
theorem omegaLimit_image_eq {α' : Type*} (ϕ : τ → α' → β) (f : Filter τ) (g : α → α') :
ω f ϕ (g '' s) = ω f (fun t x ↦ ϕ t (g x)) s := by simp only [omegaLimit, image2_image_right]
theorem omegaLimit_preimage_subset {α' : Type*} (ϕ : τ → α' → β) (s : Set α') (f : Filter τ)
(g : α → α') : ω f (fun t x ↦ ϕ t (g x)) (g ⁻¹' s) ⊆ ω f ϕ s :=
mapsTo_omegaLimit _ (mapsTo_preimage _ _) (fun _t _x ↦ rfl) continuous_id
/-!
### Equivalent definitions of the omega limit
The next few lemmas are various versions of the property
characterising ω-limits:
-/
/-- An element `y` is in the ω-limit set of `s` w.r.t. `f` if the
preimages of an arbitrary neighbourhood of `y` frequently
(w.r.t. `f`) intersects of `s`. -/
theorem mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently (y : β) :
y ∈ ω f ϕ s ↔ ∀ n ∈ 𝓝 y, ∃ᶠ t in f, (s ∩ ϕ t ⁻¹' n).Nonempty := by
simp_rw [frequently_iff, omegaLimit_def, mem_iInter, mem_closure_iff_nhds]
constructor
· intro h _ hn _ hu
rcases h _ hu _ hn with ⟨_, _, _, ht, _, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ht, _, hx, by rwa [mem_preimage]⟩
· intro h _ hu _ hn
rcases h _ hn hu with ⟨_, ht, _, hx, hϕtx⟩
exact ⟨_, hϕtx, _, ht, _, hx, rfl⟩
/-- An element `y` is in the ω-limit set of `s` w.r.t. `f` if the
forward images of `s` frequently (w.r.t. `f`) intersect arbitrary
neighbourhoods of `y`. -/
theorem mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently₂ (y : β) :
y ∈ ω f ϕ s ↔ ∀ n ∈ 𝓝 y, ∃ᶠ t in f, (ϕ t '' s ∩ n).Nonempty := by
simp_rw [mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently, image_inter_nonempty_iff]
/-- An element `y` is in the ω-limit of `x` w.r.t. `f` if the forward
images of `x` frequently (w.r.t. `f`) falls within an arbitrary
neighbourhood of `y`. -/
theorem mem_omegaLimit_singleton_iff_map_cluster_point (x : α) (y : β) :
y ∈ ω f ϕ {x} ↔ MapClusterPt y f fun t ↦ ϕ t x := by
simp_rw [mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently, mapClusterPt_iff_frequently, singleton_inter_nonempty,
mem_preimage]
/-!
### Set operations and omega limits
-/
theorem omegaLimit_inter : ω f ϕ (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊆ ω f ϕ s₁ ∩ ω f ϕ s₂ :=
subset_inter (omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ inter_subset_left)
(omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ inter_subset_right)
theorem omegaLimit_iInter (p : ι → Set α) : ω f ϕ (⋂ i, p i) ⊆ ⋂ i, ω f ϕ (p i) :=
subset_iInter fun _i ↦ omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ (iInter_subset _ _)
theorem omegaLimit_union : ω f ϕ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = ω f ϕ s₁ ∪ ω f ϕ s₂ := by
ext y; constructor
· simp only [mem_union, mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently, union_inter_distrib_right, union_nonempty,
frequently_or_distrib]
contrapose!
simp only [not_frequently, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← subset_empty_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨n₁, hn₁, h₁⟩, ⟨n₂, hn₂, h₂⟩⟩
refine ⟨n₁ ∩ n₂, inter_mem hn₁ hn₂, h₁.mono fun t ↦ ?_, h₂.mono fun t ↦ ?_⟩
exacts [Subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| preimage_mono inter_subset_left,
Subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| preimage_mono inter_subset_right]
· rintro (hy | hy)
exacts [omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ subset_union_left hy,
omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ subset_union_right hy]
theorem omegaLimit_iUnion (p : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, ω f ϕ (p i) ⊆ ω f ϕ (⋃ i, p i) := by
rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
exact fun i ↦ omegaLimit_mono_right _ _ (subset_iUnion _ _)
/-!
Different expressions for omega limits, useful for rewrites. In
particular, one may restrict the intersection to sets in `f` which are
subsets of some set `v` also in `f`.
-/
theorem omegaLimit_eq_iInter : ω f ϕ s = ⋂ u : ↥f.sets, closure (image2 ϕ u s) :=
biInter_eq_iInter _ _
theorem omegaLimit_eq_biInter_inter {v : Set τ} (hv : v ∈ f) :
ω f ϕ s = ⋂ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ (u ∩ v) s) :=
Subset.antisymm (iInter₂_mono' fun u hu ↦ ⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem hu hv, Subset.rfl⟩)
(iInter₂_mono fun _u _hu ↦ closure_mono <| image2_subset inter_subset_left Subset.rfl)
theorem omegaLimit_eq_iInter_inter {v : Set τ} (hv : v ∈ f) :
ω f ϕ s = ⋂ u : ↥f.sets, closure (image2 ϕ (u ∩ v) s) := by
rw [omegaLimit_eq_biInter_inter _ _ _ hv]
apply biInter_eq_iInter
theorem omegaLimit_subset_closure_fw_image {u : Set τ} (hu : u ∈ f) :
ω f ϕ s ⊆ closure (image2 ϕ u s) := by
rw [omegaLimit_eq_iInter]
intro _ hx
rw [mem_iInter] at hx
exact hx ⟨u, hu⟩
-- An instance with better keys
instance : Inhabited f.sets := Filter.inhabitedMem
/-!
### ω-limits and compactness
-/
/-- A set is eventually carried into any open neighbourhood of its ω-limit:
if `c` is a compact set such that `closure {ϕ t x | t ∈ v, x ∈ s} ⊆ c` for some `v ∈ f`
and `n` is an open neighbourhood of `ω f ϕ s`, then for some `u ∈ f` we have
`closure {ϕ t x | t ∈ u, x ∈ s} ⊆ n`. -/
theorem eventually_closure_subset_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset' {c : Set β}
(hc₁ : IsCompact c) (hc₂ : ∃ v ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ v s) ⊆ c) {n : Set β} (hn₁ : IsOpen n)
(hn₂ : ω f ϕ s ⊆ n) : ∃ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s) ⊆ n := by
rcases hc₂ with ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩
let k := closure (image2 ϕ v s)
have hk : IsCompact (k \ n) :=
(hc₁.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure hv₂).diff hn₁
let j u := (closure (image2 ϕ (u ∩ v) s))ᶜ
have hj₁ : ∀ u ∈ f, IsOpen (j u) := fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_compl_iff.mpr isClosed_closure
have hj₂ : k \ n ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ f, j u := by
have : ⋃ u ∈ f, j u = ⋃ u : (↥f.sets), j u := biUnion_eq_iUnion _ _
rw [this, diff_subset_comm, diff_iUnion]
rw [omegaLimit_eq_iInter_inter _ _ _ hv₁] at hn₂
simp_rw [j, diff_compl]
rw [← inter_iInter]
exact Subset.trans inter_subset_right hn₂
rcases hk.elim_finite_subcover_image hj₁ hj₂ with ⟨g, hg₁ : ∀ u ∈ g, u ∈ f, hg₂, hg₃⟩
let w := (⋂ u ∈ g, u) ∩ v
have hw₂ : w ∈ f := by simpa [w, *]
have hw₃ : k \ n ⊆ (closure (image2 ϕ w s))ᶜ := by
apply Subset.trans hg₃
simp only [j, iUnion_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl]
intros u hu
unfold w
gcongr
refine iInter_subset_of_subset u (iInter_subset_of_subset hu ?_)
all_goals exact Subset.rfl
have hw₄ : kᶜ ⊆ (closure (image2 ϕ w s))ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_subset_compl]
exact closure_mono (image2_subset inter_subset_right Subset.rfl)
have hnc : nᶜ ⊆ k \ n ∪ kᶜ := by rw [union_comm, ← inter_subset, diff_eq, inter_comm]
have hw : closure (image2 ϕ w s) ⊆ n :=
compl_subset_compl.mp (Subset.trans hnc (union_subset hw₃ hw₄))
exact ⟨_, hw₂, hw⟩
/-- A set is eventually carried into any open neighbourhood of its ω-limit:
if `c` is a compact set such that `closure {ϕ t x | t ∈ v, x ∈ s} ⊆ c` for some `v ∈ f`
and `n` is an open neighbourhood of `ω f ϕ s`, then for some `u ∈ f` we have
`closure {ϕ t x | t ∈ u, x ∈ s} ⊆ n`. -/
theorem eventually_closure_subset_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset [T2Space β]
{c : Set β} (hc₁ : IsCompact c) (hc₂ : ∀ᶠ t in f, MapsTo (ϕ t) s c) {n : Set β} (hn₁ : IsOpen n)
(hn₂ : ω f ϕ s ⊆ n) : ∃ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s) ⊆ n :=
eventually_closure_subset_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset' f ϕ _ hc₁
⟨_, hc₂, closure_minimal (image2_subset_iff.2 fun _t ↦ id) hc₁.isClosed⟩ hn₁ hn₂
theorem eventually_mapsTo_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset [T2Space β]
{c : Set β} (hc₁ : IsCompact c) (hc₂ : ∀ᶠ t in f, MapsTo (ϕ t) s c) {n : Set β} (hn₁ : IsOpen n)
(hn₂ : ω f ϕ s ⊆ n) : ∀ᶠ t in f, MapsTo (ϕ t) s n := by
rcases eventually_closure_subset_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset f ϕ s hc₁
hc₂ hn₁ hn₂ with
⟨u, hu_mem, hu⟩
refine mem_of_superset hu_mem fun t ht x hx ↦ ?_
exact hu (subset_closure <| mem_image2_of_mem ht hx)
theorem eventually_closure_subset_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset [CompactSpace β] {v : Set β}
(hv₁ : IsOpen v) (hv₂ : ω f ϕ s ⊆ v) : ∃ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s) ⊆ v :=
eventually_closure_subset_of_isCompact_absorbing_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset' _ _ _
isCompact_univ ⟨univ, univ_mem, subset_univ _⟩ hv₁ hv₂
theorem eventually_mapsTo_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset [CompactSpace β] {v : Set β}
(hv₁ : IsOpen v) (hv₂ : ω f ϕ s ⊆ v) : ∀ᶠ t in f, MapsTo (ϕ t) s v := by
rcases eventually_closure_subset_of_isOpen_of_omegaLimit_subset f ϕ s hv₁ hv₂ with ⟨u, hu_mem, hu⟩
refine mem_of_superset hu_mem fun t ht x hx ↦ ?_
exact hu (subset_closure <| mem_image2_of_mem ht hx)
/-- The ω-limit of a nonempty set w.r.t. a nontrivial filter is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_omegaLimit_of_isCompact_absorbing [NeBot f] {c : Set β} (hc₁ : IsCompact c)
(hc₂ : ∃ v ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ v s) ⊆ c) (hs : s.Nonempty) : (ω f ϕ s).Nonempty := by
rcases hc₂ with ⟨v, hv₁, hv₂⟩
rw [omegaLimit_eq_iInter_inter _ _ _ hv₁]
apply IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
· rintro ⟨u₁, hu₁⟩ ⟨u₂, hu₂⟩
use ⟨u₁ ∩ u₂, inter_mem hu₁ hu₂⟩
constructor
all_goals exact closure_mono (image2_subset (inter_subset_inter_left _ (by simp)) Subset.rfl)
· intro u
have hn : (image2 ϕ (u ∩ v) s).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image2 (Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem u.prop hv₁)) hs
exact hn.mono subset_closure
· intro
apply hc₁.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure
calc
_ ⊆ closure (image2 ϕ v s) := closure_mono (image2_subset inter_subset_right Subset.rfl)
_ ⊆ c := hv₂
· exact fun _ ↦ isClosed_closure
theorem nonempty_omegaLimit [CompactSpace β] [NeBot f] (hs : s.Nonempty) : (ω f ϕ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_omegaLimit_of_isCompact_absorbing _ _ _ isCompact_univ ⟨univ, univ_mem, subset_univ _⟩ hs
end omegaLimit
/-!
### ω-limits of flows by a monoid
-/
namespace Flow
variable {τ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace τ] [AddMonoid τ] [ContinuousAdd τ] {α : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace α] (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : Flow τ α) (s : Set α)
open omegaLimit
theorem isInvariant_omegaLimit (hf : ∀ t, Tendsto (t + ·) f f) : IsInvariant ϕ (ω f ϕ s) := by
refine fun t ↦ MapsTo.mono_right ?_ (omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto ϕ s (hf t))
exact
mapsTo_omegaLimit _ (mapsTo_id _) (fun t' x ↦ (ϕ.map_add _ _ _).symm)
(continuous_const.flow ϕ continuous_id)
theorem omegaLimit_image_subset (t : τ) (ht : Tendsto (· + t) f f) :
ω f ϕ (ϕ t '' s) ⊆ ω f ϕ s := by
simp only [omegaLimit_image_eq, ← map_add]
exact omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto ϕ s ht
end Flow
/-!
### ω-limits of flows by a group
-/
namespace Flow
variable {τ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace τ] [AddCommGroup τ] [IsTopologicalAddGroup τ] {α : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace α] (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : Flow τ α) (s : Set α)
open omegaLimit
/-- the ω-limit of a forward image of `s` is the same as the ω-limit of `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem omegaLimit_image_eq (hf : ∀ t, Tendsto (· + t) f f) (t : τ) : ω f ϕ (ϕ t '' s) = ω f ϕ s :=
Subset.antisymm (omegaLimit_image_subset _ _ _ _ (hf t)) <|
calc
ω f ϕ s = ω f ϕ (ϕ (-t) '' (ϕ t '' s)) := by simp [image_image, ← map_add]
_ ⊆ ω f ϕ (ϕ t '' s) := omegaLimit_image_subset _ _ _ _ (hf _)
theorem omegaLimit_omegaLimit (hf : ∀ t, Tendsto (t + ·) f f) : ω f ϕ (ω f ϕ s) ⊆ ω f ϕ s := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_omegaLimit_iff_frequently₂, frequently_iff]
intro _ h
rintro n hn u hu
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp hn with ⟨o, ho₁, ho₂, ho₃⟩
rcases h o (IsOpen.mem_nhds ho₂ ho₃) hu with ⟨t, _ht₁, ht₂⟩
have l₁ : (ω f ϕ s ∩ o).Nonempty :=
ht₂.mono
(inter_subset_inter_left _
((isInvariant_iff_image _ _).mp (isInvariant_omegaLimit _ _ _ hf) _))
have l₂ : (closure (image2 ϕ u s) ∩ o).Nonempty :=
l₁.mono fun b hb ↦ ⟨omegaLimit_subset_closure_fw_image _ _ _ hu hb.1, hb.2⟩
have l₃ : (o ∩ image2 ϕ u s).Nonempty := by
rcases l₂ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact mem_closure_iff_nhds.mp hb₁ o (IsOpen.mem_nhds ho₂ hb₂)
rcases l₃ with ⟨ϕra, ho, ⟨_, hr, _, ha, hϕra⟩⟩
exact ⟨_, hr, ϕra, ⟨_, ha, hϕra⟩, ho₁ ho⟩
end Flow
| Mathlib/Dynamics/OmegaLimit.lean | 360 | 364 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Norm.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Discriminant
/-!
# Field/algebra norm / trace and localization
This file contains results on the combination of `IsLocalization` and `Algebra.norm`,
`Algebra.trace` and `Algebra.discr`.
## Main results
* `Algebra.norm_localization`: let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be localizations at `M`
of `R S` respectively. Then the norm of `a : Sₘ` over `Rₘ` is the norm of `a : S` over `R`
if `S` is free as `R`-module.
* `Algebra.trace_localization`: let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be localizations at `M`
of `R S` respectively. Then the trace of `a : Sₘ` over `Rₘ` is the trace of `a : S` over `R`
if `S` is free as `R`-module.
* `Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization`: let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be
localizations at `M` of `R S` respectively. Let `b` be a `R`-basis of `S`. Then discriminant of
the `Rₘ`-basis of `Sₘ` induced by `b` is the discriminant of `b`.
## Tags
field norm, algebra norm, localization
-/
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
variable (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
variable {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [Algebra R Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ] [Algebra S Sₘ]
variable (M : Submonoid R)
variable [IsLocalization M Rₘ] [IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
variable [Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [Algebra R Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R S Sₘ]
include M
open Algebra
theorem Algebra.map_leftMulMatrix_localization {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(b : Basis ι R S) (a : S) :
(algebraMap R Rₘ).mapMatrix (leftMulMatrix b a) =
leftMulMatrix (b.localizationLocalization Rₘ M Sₘ) (algebraMap S Sₘ a) := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.map_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, leftMulMatrix_eq_repr_mul, ← map_mul,
Basis.localizationLocalization_apply, Basis.localizationLocalization_repr_algebraMap]
/-- Let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be localizations at `M` of `R S` respectively.
Then the norm of `a : Sₘ` over `Rₘ` is the norm of `a : S` over `R` if `S` is free as `R`-module.
-/
theorem Algebra.norm_localization [Module.Free R S] [Module.Finite R S] (a : S) :
Algebra.norm Rₘ (algebraMap S Sₘ a) = algebraMap R Rₘ (Algebra.norm R a) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· haveI : Subsingleton Rₘ := Module.subsingleton R Rₘ
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R S
letI := Classical.decEq (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex R S)
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det (b.localizationLocalization Rₘ M Sₘ),
Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det b, RingHom.map_det, ← Algebra.map_leftMulMatrix_localization]
variable {M} in
/-- The norm of `a : S` in `R` can be computed in `Sₘ`. -/
lemma Algebra.norm_eq_iff [Module.Free R S] [Module.Finite R S] {a : S} {b : R}
(hM : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) : Algebra.norm R a = b ↔
(Algebra.norm Rₘ) ((algebraMap S Sₘ) a) = algebraMap R Rₘ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ Algebra.norm_localization _ M _, fun h ↦
IsLocalization.injective Rₘ hM <| h.symm ▸ (Algebra.norm_localization R M a).symm⟩
/-- Let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be localizations at `M` of `R S` respectively.
Then the trace of `a : Sₘ` over `Rₘ` is the trace of `a : S` over `R` if `S` is free as `R`-module.
-/
theorem Algebra.trace_localization [Module.Free R S] [Module.Finite R S] (a : S) :
Algebra.trace Rₘ Sₘ (algebraMap S Sₘ a) = algebraMap R Rₘ (Algebra.trace R S a) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· haveI : Subsingleton Rₘ := Module.subsingleton R Rₘ
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R S
letI := Classical.decEq (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex R S)
rw [Algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace (b.localizationLocalization Rₘ M Sₘ),
Algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace b, ← Algebra.map_leftMulMatrix_localization]
exact (AddMonoidHom.map_trace (algebraMap R Rₘ).toAddMonoidHom _).symm
section LocalizationLocalization
variable (Sₘ : Type*) [CommRing Sₘ] [Algebra S Sₘ] [Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [Algebra R Sₘ]
variable [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R S Sₘ]
variable [IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
theorem Algebra.traceMatrix_localizationLocalization (b : Basis ι R S) :
Algebra.traceMatrix Rₘ (b.localizationLocalization Rₘ M Sₘ) =
(algebraMap R Rₘ).mapMatrix (Algebra.traceMatrix R b) := by
| have : Module.Finite R S := Module.Finite.of_basis b
have : Module.Free R S := Module.Free.of_basis b
ext i j : 2
simp_rw [RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, Matrix.map_apply, traceMatrix_apply, traceForm_apply,
Basis.localizationLocalization_apply, ← map_mul]
exact Algebra.trace_localization R M _
/-- Let `S` be an extension of `R` and `Rₘ Sₘ` be localizations at `M` of `R S` respectively. Let
`b` be a `R`-basis of `S`. Then discriminant of the `Rₘ`-basis of `Sₘ` induced by `b` is the
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/NormTrace.lean | 101 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Star
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Defs
/-!
# Convex sets and functions in vector spaces
In a 𝕜-vector space, we define the following objects and properties.
* `Convex 𝕜 s`: A set `s` is convex if for any two points `x y ∈ s` it includes `segment 𝕜 x y`.
* `stdSimplex 𝕜 ι`: The standard simplex in `ι → 𝕜` (currently requires `Fintype ι`). It is the
intersection of the positive quadrant with the hyperplane `s.sum = 1`.
We also provide various equivalent versions of the definitions above, prove that some specific sets
are convex.
## TODO
Generalize all this file to affine spaces.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F β : Type*}
open LinearMap Set
open scoped Convex Pointwise
/-! ### Convexity of sets -/
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (s : Set E) {x : E}
/-- Convexity of sets. -/
def Convex : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ s → StarConvex 𝕜 x s
variable {𝕜 s}
theorem Convex.starConvex (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) : StarConvex 𝕜 x s :=
hs hx
theorem convex_iff_segment_subset : Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => starConvex_iff_segment_subset
theorem Convex.segment_subset (h : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
[x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
convex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hx hy
theorem Convex.openSegment_subset (h : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hx hy)
/-- Alternative definition of set convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
theorem convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • s + b • s ⊆ s :=
Iff.intro
(by
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hu hv ha hb hab)
fun h _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => (h ha hb hab) (Set.add_mem_add ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)
alias ⟨Convex.set_combo_subset, _⟩ := convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset
theorem convex_empty : Convex 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ => False.elim
theorem convex_univ : Convex 𝕜 (Set.univ : Set E) := fun _ _ => starConvex_univ _
theorem Convex.inter {t : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) : Convex 𝕜 (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hx => (hs hx.1).inter (ht hx.2)
theorem convex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, Convex 𝕜 s) : Convex 𝕜 (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hx =>
starConvex_sInter fun _ hs => h _ hs <| hx _ hs
theorem convex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, Convex 𝕜 (s i)) :
Convex 𝕜 (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ convex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem convex_iInter₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, Convex 𝕜 (s i j)) : Convex 𝕜 (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) :=
convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter <| h i
theorem Convex.prod {s : Set E} {t : Set F} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) :
Convex 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ hx => (hs hx.1).prod (ht hx.2)
theorem convex_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (E i)] [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)]
{s : Set ι} {t : ∀ i, Set (E i)} (ht : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Convex 𝕜 (t i)) : Convex 𝕜 (s.pi t) :=
fun _ hx => starConvex_pi fun _ hi => ht hi <| hx _ hi
theorem Directed.convex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(hc : ∀ ⦃i : ι⦄, Convex 𝕜 (s i)) : Convex 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hx hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨j, hy⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hdir i j
exact ⟨k, hc (hik hx) (hjk hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem DirectedOn.convex_sUnion {c : Set (Set E)} (hdir : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) c)
(hc : ∀ ⦃A : Set E⦄, A ∈ c → Convex 𝕜 A) : Convex 𝕜 (⋃₀ c) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact (directedOn_iff_directed.1 hdir).convex_iUnion fun A => hc A.2
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {s : Set E} {x : E}
theorem convex_iff_openSegment_subset [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem convex_iff_forall_pos :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_forall_pos
theorem convex_iff_pairwise_pos : Convex 𝕜 s ↔
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine convex_iff_forall_pos.trans ⟨fun h x hx y hy _ => h hx hy, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rwa [Convex.combo_self hab]
· exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem Convex.starConvex_iff [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (h : s.Nonempty) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun hxs => hxs.mem h, hs.starConvex⟩
protected theorem Set.Subsingleton.convex {s : Set E} (h : s.Subsingleton) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr (h.pairwise _)
@[simp] theorem convex_singleton (c : E) : Convex 𝕜 ({c} : Set E) :=
subsingleton_singleton.convex
theorem convex_zero : Convex 𝕜 (0 : Set E) :=
convex_singleton _
theorem convex_segment [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] (x y : E) : Convex 𝕜 [x -[𝕜] y] := by
rintro p ⟨ap, bp, hap, hbp, habp, rfl⟩ q ⟨aq, bq, haq, hbq, habq, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine
⟨a * ap + b * aq, a * bp + b * bq, add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hap) (mul_nonneg hb haq),
add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hbp) (mul_nonneg hb hbq), ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [add_add_add_comm, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, habp, habq, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
· match_scalars <;> noncomm_ring
theorem Convex.linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
exact ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hx hy ha hb hab, by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem Convex.is_linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image <| hf.mk' f
theorem Convex.linear_preimage {𝕜₁ : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜₁] [Module 𝕜₁ E] [Module 𝕜₁ F] {s : Set F}
[SMul 𝕜 𝕜₁] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ F] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜₁] F) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower]
| exact hs hx hy ha hb hab
theorem Convex.is_linear_preimage {𝕜₁ : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜₁] [Module 𝕜₁ E] [Module 𝕜₁ F] {s : Set F}
[SMul 𝕜 𝕜₁] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ F] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F}
(hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜₁ f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hs.linear_preimage <| hf.mk' f
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Basic.lean | 179 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# Angles between vectors
This file defines unoriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `InnerProductGeometry.angle` is the undirected angle between two vectors.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
/-- The undirected angle between two vectors. If either vector is 0,
this is π/2. See `Orientation.oangle` for the corresponding oriented angle
definition. -/
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x := by
unfold angle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
/-- The angle between two vectors does not depend on their order. -/
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
/-- The angle between the negation of two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
/-- The angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
/-- The angle between two vectors is at most π. -/
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem sin_angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ sin (angle x y) :=
sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (angle_nonneg x y) (angle_le_pi x y)
/-- The angle between a vector and the negation of another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
/-- The angle between the negation of a vector and another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
/-- The angle between the zero vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
/-- The angle between a vector and the zero vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_right, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_self {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x x = 0 := by
unfold angle
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, div_self (inner_self_ne_zero.2 hx : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0),
Real.arccos_one]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_self_neg_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x (-x) = π := by
rw [angle_neg_right, angle_self hx, sub_zero]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that
vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_self_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle (-x) x = π := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_self_neg_of_nonzero hx]
/-- The angle between a vector and a positive multiple of a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle x (r • y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ r, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (ne_of_gt hr)]
/-- The angle between a positive multiple of a vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle (r • x) y = angle x y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_pos y x hr, angle_comm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a negative multiple of a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
angle x (r • y) = angle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, angle_neg_right, angle_smul_right_of_pos x y (neg_pos_of_neg hr),
angle_neg_right]
/-- The angle between a negative multiple of a vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : angle (r • x) y = angle (-x) y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_neg y x hr, angle_comm]
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors, multiplied by the
product of their norms. -/
theorem cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [cos_angle, div_mul_cancel_of_imp]
simp +contextual [or_imp]
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors, multiplied by the
product of their norms. -/
theorem sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) :
Real.sin (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = √(⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫) := by
unfold angle
rw [Real.sin_arccos, ← Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
← Real.sqrt_mul' _ (mul_self_nonneg _), sq,
Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases h : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ = 0
· rw [show ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ * (‖y‖ * ‖y‖) = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) by ring, h, mul_zero,
mul_zero, zero_sub]
rcases eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h with hx | hy
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hx
rw [hx, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hy
rw [hy, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· -- takes 600ms; squeezing the "equivalent" simp call yields an invalid result
field_simp [h]
ring_nf
/-- The angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are
nonzero and one is a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_zero, LE.le.le_iff_eq,
eq_comm]
| exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
/-- The angle between two vectors is π if and only if they are nonzero
and one is a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_pi, LE.le.le_iff_eq]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
/-- If the angle between two vectors is π, the angles between those
vectors and a third vector add to π. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (z : V) (h : angle x y = π) :
angle x z + angle y z = π := by
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
rw [angle_smul_left_of_neg x z hr, angle_neg_left, add_sub_cancel]
/-- Two vectors have inner product 0 if and only if the angle between
them is π/2. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 190 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
/-!
# Zeckendorf's Theorem
This file proves Zeckendorf's theorem: Every natural number can be written uniquely as a sum of
distinct non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsZeckendorfRep`: Predicate for a list to be an increasing sequence of non-consecutive
natural numbers greater than or equal to `2`, namely a Zeckendorf representation.
* `Nat.greatestFib`: Greatest index of a Fibonacci number less than or equal to some natural.
* `Nat.zeckendorf`: Send a natural number to its Zeckendorf representation.
* `Nat.zeckendorfEquiv`: Zeckendorf's theorem, in the form of an equivalence between natural numbers
and Zeckendorf representations.
## TODO
We could prove that the order induced by `zeckendorfEquiv` on Zeckendorf representations is exactly
the lexicographic order.
## Tags
fibonacci, zeckendorf, digit
-/
open List Nat
-- TODO: The `local` attribute makes this not considered as an instance by linters
@[nolint defLemma docBlame]
local instance : IsTrans ℕ fun a b ↦ b + 2 ≤ a where
trans _a _b _c hba hcb := hcb.trans <| le_self_add.trans hba
namespace List
/-- A list of natural numbers is a Zeckendorf representation (of a natural number) if it is an
increasing sequence of non-consecutive numbers greater than or equal to `2`.
This is relevant for Zeckendorf's theorem, since if we write a natural `n` as a sum of Fibonacci
numbers `(l.map fib).sum`, `IsZeckendorfRep l` exactly means that we can't simplify any expression
of the form `fib n + fib (n + 1) = fib (n + 2)`, `fib 1 = fib 2` or `fib 0 = 0` in the sum. -/
def IsZeckendorfRep (l : List ℕ) : Prop := (l ++ [0]).Chain' (fun a b ↦ b + 2 ≤ a)
@[simp]
lemma IsZeckendorfRep_nil : IsZeckendorfRep [] := by simp [IsZeckendorfRep]
lemma IsZeckendorfRep.sum_fib_lt : ∀ {n l}, IsZeckendorfRep l → (∀ a ∈ (l ++ [0]).head?, a < n) →
(l.map fib).sum < fib n
| _, [], _, hn => fib_pos.2 <| hn _ rfl
| n, a :: l, hl, hn => by
simp only [IsZeckendorfRep, cons_append, chain'_iff_pairwise, pairwise_cons] at hl
have : ∀ b, b ∈ head? (l ++ [0]) → b < a - 1 :=
fun b hb ↦ lt_tsub_iff_right.2 <| hl.1 _ <| mem_of_mem_head? hb
simp only [mem_append, mem_singleton, ← chain'_iff_pairwise, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq,
zero_add] at hl
simp only [map, List.sum_cons]
refine (add_lt_add_left (sum_fib_lt hl.2 this) _).trans_le ?_
rw [add_comm, ← fib_add_one (hl.1.2.trans_lt' zero_lt_two).ne']
exact fib_mono (hn _ rfl)
end List
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- The greatest index of a Fibonacci number less than or equal to `n`. -/
def greatestFib (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (n + 1).findGreatest (fun k ↦ fib k ≤ n)
lemma fib_greatestFib_le (n : ℕ) : fib (greatestFib n) ≤ n :=
findGreatest_spec (P := (fun k ↦ fib k ≤ n)) (zero_le _) <| zero_le _
lemma greatestFib_mono : Monotone greatestFib :=
fun _a _b hab ↦ findGreatest_mono (fun _k ↦ hab.trans') <| add_le_add_right hab _
@[simp] lemma le_greatestFib : m ≤ greatestFib n ↔ fib m ≤ n :=
⟨fun h ↦ (fib_mono h).trans <| fib_greatestFib_le _,
fun h ↦ le_findGreatest (m.le_fib_add_one.trans <| add_le_add_right h _) h⟩
@[simp] lemma greatestFib_lt : greatestFib m < n ↔ m < fib n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_greatestFib
lemma lt_fib_greatestFib_add_one (n : ℕ) : n < fib (greatestFib n + 1) :=
greatestFib_lt.1 <| lt_succ_self _
@[simp] lemma greatestFib_fib : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → greatestFib (fib n) = n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _n + 2, _ => findGreatest_eq_iff.2
⟨le_fib_add_one _, fun _ ↦ le_rfl, fun _m hnm _ ↦ ((fib_lt_fib le_add_self).2 hnm).not_le⟩
| @[simp] lemma greatestFib_eq_zero : greatestFib n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using findGreatest_eq_zero_iff.1 h zero_lt_one le_add_self, by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Zeckendorf.lean | 96 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Divisibility
This file defines the basics of the divisibility relation in the context of `(Comm)` `Monoid`s.
## Main definitions
* `semigroupDvd`
## Implementation notes
The divisibility relation is defined for all monoids, and as such, depends on the order of
multiplication if the monoid is not commutative. There are two possible conventions for
divisibility in the noncommutative context, and this relation follows the convention for ordinals,
so `a | b` is defined as `∃ c, b = a * c`.
## Tags
divisibility, divides
-/
variable {α : Type*}
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α] {a b c : α}
/-- There are two possible conventions for divisibility, which coincide in a `CommMonoid`.
This matches the convention for ordinals. -/
instance (priority := 100) semigroupDvd : Dvd α :=
Dvd.mk fun a b => ∃ c, b = a * c
-- TODO: this used to not have `c` explicit, but that seems to be important
-- for use with tactics, similar to `Exists.intro`
theorem Dvd.intro (c : α) (h : a * c = b) : a ∣ b :=
Exists.intro c h.symm
alias dvd_of_mul_right_eq := Dvd.intro
theorem exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = a * c :=
h
theorem dvd_def : a ∣ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a * c :=
Iff.rfl
alias dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_right := dvd_def
theorem Dvd.elim {P : Prop} {a b : α} (H₁ : a ∣ b) (H₂ : ∀ c, b = a * c → P) : P :=
Exists.elim H₁ H₂
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm
@[trans]
theorem dvd_trans : a ∣ b → b ∣ c → a ∣ c
| ⟨d, h₁⟩, ⟨e, h₂⟩ => ⟨d * e, h₁ ▸ h₂.trans <| mul_assoc a d e⟩
alias Dvd.dvd.trans := dvd_trans
/-- Transitivity of `|` for use in `calc` blocks. -/
instance : IsTrans α Dvd.dvd :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => dvd_trans⟩
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_right (a b : α) : a ∣ a * b :=
Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ b * c :=
h.trans (dvd_mul_right b c)
alias Dvd.dvd.mul_right := dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
theorem dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (h : a * b ∣ c) : a ∣ c :=
(dvd_mul_right a b).trans h
/-- An element `a` in a semigroup is primal if whenever `a` is a divisor of `b * c`, it can be
factored as the product of a divisor of `b` and a divisor of `c`. -/
def IsPrimal (a : α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃b c⦄, a ∣ b * c → ∃ a₁ a₂, a₁ ∣ b ∧ a₂ ∣ c ∧ a = a₁ * a₂
variable (α) in
/-- A monoid is a decomposition monoid if every element is primal. An integral domain whose
multiplicative monoid is a decomposition monoid, is called a pre-Schreier domain; it is a
Schreier domain if it is moreover integrally closed. -/
@[mk_iff] class DecompositionMonoid : Prop where
primal (a : α) : IsPrimal a
theorem exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul [DecompositionMonoid α] {b c a : α} (H : a ∣ b * c) :
∃ a₁ a₂, a₁ ∣ b ∧ a₂ ∣ c ∧ a = a₁ * a₂ := DecompositionMonoid.primal a H
end Semigroup
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b c : α} {m n : ℕ}
@[refl, simp]
theorem dvd_refl (a : α) : a ∣ a :=
Dvd.intro 1 (mul_one a)
theorem dvd_rfl : ∀ {a : α}, a ∣ a := fun {a} => dvd_refl a
instance : IsRefl α (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨dvd_refl⟩
theorem one_dvd (a : α) : 1 ∣ a :=
Dvd.intro a (one_mul a)
theorem dvd_of_eq (h : a = b) : a ∣ b := by rw [h]
alias Eq.dvd := dvd_of_eq
lemma pow_dvd_pow (a : α) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m ∣ a ^ n :=
⟨a ^ (n - m), by rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]⟩
lemma dvd_pow (hab : a ∣ b) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : n ≠ 0), a ∣ b ^ n
| 0, hn => (hn rfl).elim
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ']; exact hab.mul_right _
alias Dvd.dvd.pow := dvd_pow
lemma dvd_pow_self (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ∣ a ^ n := dvd_rfl.pow hn
theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : α) (h : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h
use d
rw [mul_assoc]
end Monoid
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup α] {a b c : α}
theorem Dvd.intro_left (c : α) (h : c * a = b) : a ∣ b :=
Dvd.intro c (by rw [mul_comm] at h; apply h)
alias dvd_of_mul_left_eq := Dvd.intro_left
theorem exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = c * a :=
Dvd.elim h fun c => fun H1 : b = a * c => Exists.intro c (Eq.trans H1 (mul_comm a c))
theorem dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left : a ∣ b ↔ ∃ c, b = c * a :=
⟨exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd, by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
exact ⟨c, mul_comm _ _⟩⟩
theorem Dvd.elim_left {P : Prop} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : ∀ c, b = c * a → P) : P :=
Exists.elim (exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd h₁) fun c => fun h₃ : b = c * a => h₂ c h₃
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_left (a b : α) : a ∣ b * a :=
Dvd.intro b (mul_comm a b)
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ c * b := by
rw [mul_comm]; exact h.mul_right _
alias Dvd.dvd.mul_left := dvd_mul_of_dvd_right
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm
theorem mul_dvd_mul : ∀ {a b c d : α}, a ∣ b → c ∣ d → a * c ∣ b * d
| a, _, c, _, ⟨e, rfl⟩, ⟨f, rfl⟩ => ⟨e * f, by simp⟩
theorem dvd_of_mul_left_dvd (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c :=
Dvd.elim h fun d ceq => Dvd.intro (a * d) (by simp [ceq])
theorem dvd_mul [DecompositionMonoid α] {k m n : α} :
k ∣ m * n ↔ ∃ d₁ d₂, d₁ ∣ m ∧ d₂ ∣ n ∧ k = d₁ * d₂ := by
refine ⟨exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨d₁, d₂, hy, hz, rfl⟩
exact mul_dvd_mul hy hz
end CommSemigroup
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b : α}
theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a * c ∣ b * c :=
mul_dvd_mul h (dvd_refl c)
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
| exact mul_dvd_mul (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h n) h
end CommMonoid
| Mathlib/Algebra/Divisibility/Basic.lean | 194 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,869 | 2,871 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Action
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
/-!
# Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `Set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`inducedOuterMeasure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = MeasurableSet`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end.
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by
classical
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
theorem le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s := by
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro
rfl
-- TODO: why this is a bad `congr` lemma?
theorem extend_congr {β : Type*} {Pb : β → Prop} {mb : ∀ s : β, Pb s → ℝ≥0∞} {sa : α} {sb : β}
(hP : P sa ↔ Pb sb) (hm : ∀ (ha : P sa) (hb : Pb sb), m sa ha = mb sb hb) :
extend m sa = extend mb sb :=
iInf_congr_Prop hP fun _h => hm _ _
@[simp]
theorem extend_top {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop} : extend (fun _ _ => ∞ : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ :=
funext fun _ => iInf_eq_top.mpr fun _ => rfl
end Extend
section ExtendSet
variable {α : Type*} {P : Set α → Prop}
variable {m : ∀ s : Set α, P s → ℝ≥0∞}
variable (P0 : P ∅) (m0 : m ∅ P0 = 0)
variable (PU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (_hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), P (⋃ i, f i))
variable
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (msU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (m_mono : ∀ ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (hs₁ : P s₁) (hs₂ : P s₂), s₁ ⊆ s₂ → m s₁ hs₁ ≤ m s₂ hs₂)
theorem extend_iUnion_nat {f : ℕ → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, P (f i))
(mU : m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i)) :
extend m (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, extend m (f i) :=
(extend_eq _ _).trans <|
mU.trans <| by
congr with i
rw [extend_eq]
include P0 m0 in
theorem extend_empty : extend m ∅ = 0 :=
(extend_eq _ P0).trans m0
section Subadditive
include PU msU in
theorem extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' (s : ℕ → Set α) :
extend m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, extend m (s i) := by
by_cases h : ∀ i, P (s i)
· rw [extend_eq _ (PU h), congr_arg tsum _]
· apply msU h
funext i
apply extend_eq _ (h i)
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.1 h
exact le_trans (le_iInf fun h => hi.elim h) (ENNReal.le_tsum i)
end Subadditive
section Mono
include m_mono in
theorem extend_mono' ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (h₁ : P s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ := by
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h₂
rw [extend_eq m h₁]
exact m_mono h₁ h₂ hs
| end Mono
section Unions
include P0 m0 PU mU in
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 129 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomialDef
/-! # Properties of continuously polynomial functions
We expand the API around continuously polynomial functions. Notably, we show that this class is
stable under the usual operations (addition, subtraction, negation).
We also prove that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and so
are continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps. In particular, such maps are
analytic.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
open scoped Topology
open Set Filter Asymptotics NNReal ENNReal
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} {n m : ℕ}
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 ⊤ :=
⟨hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const, fun n hn ↦ constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply (id hn : 0 < n).ne'⟩
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 :=
⟨⊤, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt_const {v : F} : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, 1, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => CPolynomialAt_const
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) r :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun N hN ↦ by
rw [Pi.add_apply, hf.finite _ ((le_max_left n m).trans hN),
hg.finite _ ((le_max_right n m).trans hN), zero_add]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt.add (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f + g) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
let ⟨_, _, hqf⟩ := hg
(hpf.add hqf).cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (-f) (-pf) x n r :=
⟨hf.1.neg, fun m hm ↦ by rw [Pi.neg_apply, hf.finite m hm, neg_zero]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (-f) (-pf) x n :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.neg.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt
theorem CPolynomialAt.neg (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (-f) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
hpf.neg.cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) r := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialAt.sub (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f - g) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialOn.add {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f + g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).add (hg z hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn.sub {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f - g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).sub (hg z hz)
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We show that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and therefore analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F) {x : Π i, Em i} {s : Set (Π i, Em i)}
open FormalMultilinearSeries
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f f.toFormalMultilinearSeries 0 (Fintype.card ι + 1) ⊤ :=
.mk' (fun _ hm ↦ dif_neg (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hm).ne) ENNReal.zero_lt_top fun y _ ↦ by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolynomialOn : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s := fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias cpolyomialOn := cpolynomialOn
lemma analyticOnNhd : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s := f.cpolynomialOn.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s := f.analyticOnNhd.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x := f.cpolynomialAt.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := f.analyticAt.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-!
### Continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps
We show that a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps is continuously polynomial
(as a function of two variables, i.e., uncurried). Therefore, it is also analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F)
{s : Set (G × (Π i, Em i))} {x : G × (Π i, Em i)}
/-- Formal multilinear series associated to a linear map into multilinear maps. -/
noncomputable def toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear :
FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 (G × (Π i, Em i)) F :=
fun n ↦ if h : Fintype.card (Option ι) = n then
(f.continuousMultilinearMapOption).domDomCongr (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq h)
else 0
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2)
f.toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear 0 (Fintype.card (Option ι) + 1) ⊤ := by
apply HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.mk' ?_ ENNReal.zero_lt_top ?_
· intro m hm
apply dif_neg
exact Nat.ne_of_lt hm
· intro y _
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear
lemma analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s x :=
f.analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousLinearMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/CPolynomial.lean | 266 | 272 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Sets invariant to a `MulAction`
In this file we define `SubMulAction R M`; a subset of a `MulAction R M` which is closed with
respect to scalar multiplication.
For most uses, typically `Submodule R M` is more powerful.
## Main definitions
* `SubMulAction.mulAction` - the `MulAction R M` transferred to the subtype.
* `SubMulAction.mulAction'` - the `MulAction S M` transferred to the subtype when
`IsScalarTower S R M`.
* `SubMulAction.isScalarTower` - the `IsScalarTower S R M` transferred to the subtype.
* `SubMulAction.inclusion` — the inclusion of a submulaction, as an equivariant map
## Tags
submodule, mul_action
-/
open Function
universe u u' u'' v
variable {S : Type u'} {T : Type u''} {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
/-- `SMulMemClass S R M` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ M` that are closed under the
scalar action of `R` on `M`.
Note that only `R` is marked as an `outParam` here, since `M` is supplied by the `SetLike`
class instead.
-/
class SMulMemClass (S : Type*) (R : outParam Type*) (M : Type*) [SMul R M] [SetLike S M] :
Prop where
/-- Multiplication by a scalar on an element of the set remains in the set. -/
smul_mem : ∀ {s : S} (r : R) {m : M}, m ∈ s → r • m ∈ s
/-- `VAddMemClass S R M` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ M` that are closed under the
additive action of `R` on `M`.
Note that only `R` is marked as an `outParam` here, since `M` is supplied by the `SetLike`
class instead. -/
class VAddMemClass (S : Type*) (R : outParam Type*) (M : Type*) [VAdd R M] [SetLike S M] :
Prop where
/-- Addition by a scalar with an element of the set remains in the set. -/
vadd_mem : ∀ {s : S} (r : R) {m : M}, m ∈ s → r +ᵥ m ∈ s
attribute [to_additive] SMulMemClass
attribute [aesop safe 10 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] SMulMemClass.smul_mem VAddMemClass.vadd_mem
/-- Not registered as an instance because `R` is an `outParam` in `SMulMemClass S R M`. -/
lemma AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass {S M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubmonoidClass S M] : SMulMemClass S ℕ M where
smul_mem n _x hx := nsmul_mem hx n
/-- Not registered as an instance because `R` is an `outParam` in `SMulMemClass S R M`. -/
lemma AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass {S M : Type*} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] : SMulMemClass S ℤ M where
smul_mem n _x hx := zsmul_mem hx n
namespace SetLike
open SMulMemClass
section SMul
variable [SMul R M] [SetLike S M] [hS : SMulMemClass S R M] (s : S)
-- lower priority so other instances are found first
/-- A subset closed under the scalar action inherits that action. -/
@[to_additive "A subset closed under the additive action inherits that action."]
instance (priority := 50) smul : SMul R s :=
⟨fun r x => ⟨r • x.1, smul_mem r x.2⟩⟩
/-- This can't be an instance because Lean wouldn't know how to find `N`, but we can still use
this to manually derive `SMulMemClass` on specific types. -/
@[to_additive] theorem _root_.SMulMemClass.ofIsScalarTower (S M N α : Type*) [SetLike S α]
[SMul M N] [SMul M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N α] [SMulMemClass S N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] :
SMulMemClass S M α :=
{ smul_mem := fun m a ha => smul_one_smul N m a ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ ha }
instance instIsScalarTower [Mul M] [MulMemClass S M] [IsScalarTower R M M]
(s : S) : IsScalarTower R s s where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : M) (y : M)
instance instSMulCommClass [Mul M] [MulMemClass S M] [SMulCommClass R M M]
(s : S) : SMulCommClass R s s where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : M) (y : M)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO lower priority not actually there
-- lower priority so later simp lemmas are used first; to appease simp_nf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
protected theorem val_smul (r : R) (x : s) : (↑(r • x) : M) = r • (x : M) :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO lower priority not actually there
-- lower priority so later simp lemmas are used first; to appease simp_nf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_smul_mk (r : R) (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : r • (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) = ⟨r • x, smul_mem r hx⟩ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_def (r : R) (x : s) : r • x = ⟨r • x, smul_mem r x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_smul_mem_iff {R M S : Type*} [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] [SetLike S M]
[SMulMemClass S R M] {N : S} {x : M} : (∀ a : R, a • x ∈ N) ↔ x ∈ N :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h 1, fun h a => SMulMemClass.smul_mem a h⟩
end SMul
section OfTower
variable {N α : Type*} [SetLike S α] [SMul M N] [SMul M α] [Monoid N]
[MulAction N α] [SMulMemClass S N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] (s : S)
-- lower priority so other instances are found first
/-- A subset closed under the scalar action inherits that action. -/
@[to_additive "A subset closed under the additive action inherits that action."]
instance (priority := 50) smul' : SMul M s where
smul r x := ⟨r • x.1, smul_one_smul N r x.1 ▸ smul_mem _ x.2⟩
instance (priority := 50) : IsScalarTower M N s where
smul_assoc m n x := Subtype.ext (smul_assoc m n x.1)
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
protected theorem val_smul_of_tower (r : M) (x : s) : (↑(r • x) : α) = r • (x : α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_smul_of_tower_mk (r : M) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
r • (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) = ⟨r • x, smul_one_smul N r x ▸ smul_mem _ hx⟩ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_of_tower_def (r : M) (x : s) :
r • x = ⟨r • x, smul_one_smul N r x.1 ▸ smul_mem _ x.2⟩ :=
rfl
end OfTower
end SetLike
/-- A SubAddAction is a set which is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
structure SubAddAction (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [VAdd R M] : Type v where
/-- The underlying set of a `SubAddAction`. -/
carrier : Set M
/-- The carrier set is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
vadd_mem' : ∀ (c : R) {x : M}, x ∈ carrier → c +ᵥ x ∈ carrier
/-- A SubMulAction is a set which is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
structure SubMulAction (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [SMul R M] : Type v where
/-- The underlying set of a `SubMulAction`. -/
carrier : Set M
/-- The carrier set is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
smul_mem' : ∀ (c : R) {x : M}, x ∈ carrier → c • x ∈ carrier
namespace SubMulAction
variable [SMul R M]
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (SubMulAction R M) M :=
⟨SubMulAction.carrier, fun p q h => by cases p; cases q; congr⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : SMulMemClass (SubMulAction R M) R M where smul_mem := smul_mem' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_carrier {p : SubMulAction R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p.carrier ↔ x ∈ (p : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {p q : SubMulAction R M} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
/-- Copy of a sub_mul_action with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive "Copy of a sub_mul_action with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities."]
protected def copy (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : SubMulAction R M where
carrier := s
smul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ p.smul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : (p.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : p.copy s hs = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
@[to_additive]
instance : Bot (SubMulAction R M) where
bot :=
{ carrier := ∅
smul_mem' := fun _c h => Set.not_mem_empty h }
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (SubMulAction R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
end SubMulAction
namespace SubMulAction
section SMul
variable [SMul R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
variable {r : R} {x : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_mem (r : R) (h : x ∈ p) : r • x ∈ p :=
p.smul_mem' r h
@[to_additive]
instance : SMul R p where smul c x := ⟨c • x.1, smul_mem _ c x.2⟩
variable {p} in
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem val_smul (r : R) (x : p) : (↑(r • x) : M) = r • (x : M) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needed because of defeq structure eta
/-- Embedding of a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`. -/
@[to_additive "Embedding of a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`."]
protected def subtype : p →[R] M where
toFun := Subtype.val
map_smul' := by simp [val_smul]
variable {p} in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_apply (x : p) : p.subtype x = x :=
rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective p.subtype :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_eq_val : (SubMulAction.subtype p : p → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
end SMul
namespace SMulMemClass
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] {A : Type*} [SetLike A M]
variable [hA : SMulMemClass A R M] (S' : A)
-- Prefer subclasses of `MulAction` over `SMulMemClass`.
/-- A `SubMulAction` of a `MulAction` is a `MulAction`. -/
@[to_additive "A `SubAddAction` of an `AddAction` is an `AddAction`."]
instance (priority := 75) toMulAction : MulAction R S' :=
Subtype.coe_injective.mulAction Subtype.val (SetLike.val_smul S')
/-- The natural `MulActionHom` over `R` from a `SubMulAction` of `M` to `M`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural `AddActionHom` over `R` from a `SubAddAction` of `M` to `M`."]
protected def subtype : S' →[R] M where
toFun := Subtype.val; map_smul' _ _ := rfl
variable {S'} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : S') :
SMulMemClass.subtype S' x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (SMulMemClass.subtype S') :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem coe_subtype : (SMulMemClass.subtype S' : S' → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
protected alias coeSubtype := SubMulAction.SMulMemClass.coe_subtype
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
protected alias _root_.SubAddAction.SMulMemClass.coeSubtype := SubAddAction.SMulMemClass.coe_subtype
end SMulMemClass
section MulActionMonoid
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
section
variable [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_of_tower_mem (s : S) {x : M} (h : x ∈ p) : s • x ∈ p := by
rw [← one_smul R x, ← smul_assoc]
exact p.smul_mem _ h
@[to_additive]
instance smul' : SMul S p where smul c x := ⟨c • x.1, smul_of_tower_mem _ c x.2⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower : IsScalarTower S R p where
smul_assoc s r x := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc s r (x : M)
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower' {S' : Type*} [SMul S' R] [SMul S' S] [SMul S' M] [IsScalarTower S' R M]
[IsScalarTower S' S M] : IsScalarTower S' S p where
smul_assoc s r x := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc s r (x : M)
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem val_smul_of_tower (s : S) (x : p) : ((s • x : p) : M) = s • (x : M) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_mem_iff' {G} [Group G] [SMul G R] [MulAction G M] [IsScalarTower G R M] (g : G)
{x : M} : g • x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ p :=
⟨fun h => inv_smul_smul g x ▸ p.smul_of_tower_mem g⁻¹ h, p.smul_of_tower_mem g⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isCentralScalar [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsScalarTower Sᵐᵒᵖ R M]
[IsCentralScalar S M] :
IsCentralScalar S p where
op_smul_eq_smul r x := Subtype.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul r (x : M)
end
section
variable [Monoid S] [SMul S R] [MulAction S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
/-- If the scalar product forms a `MulAction`, then the subset inherits this action -/
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction' : MulAction S p where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul x := Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ (x : M)
mul_smul c₁ c₂ x := Subtype.ext <| mul_smul c₁ c₂ (x : M)
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction : MulAction R p :=
p.mulAction'
end
/-- Orbits in a `SubMulAction` coincide with orbits in the ambient space. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem val_image_orbit {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
Subtype.val '' MulAction.orbit R m = MulAction.orbit R (m : M) :=
(Set.range_comp _ _).symm
/- -- Previously, the relatively useless :
lemma orbit_of_sub_mul {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
(mul_action.orbit R m : set M) = MulAction.orbit R (m : M) := rfl
-/
@[to_additive]
theorem val_preimage_orbit {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
Subtype.val ⁻¹' MulAction.orbit R (m : M) = MulAction.orbit R m := by
rw [← val_image_orbit, Subtype.val_injective.preimage_image]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_orbit_subMul_iff {p : SubMulAction R M} {x m : p} :
x ∈ MulAction.orbit R m ↔ (x : M) ∈ MulAction.orbit R (m : M) := by
rw [← val_preimage_orbit, Set.mem_preimage]
/-- Stabilizers in monoid SubMulAction coincide with stabilizers in the ambient space -/
@[to_additive]
theorem stabilizer_of_subMul.submonoid {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
MulAction.stabilizerSubmonoid R m = MulAction.stabilizerSubmonoid R (m : M) := by
ext
simp only [MulAction.mem_stabilizerSubmonoid_iff, ← SubMulAction.val_smul, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
end MulActionMonoid
section MulActionGroup
variable [Group R] [MulAction R M]
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_of_subMul (p : SubMulAction R M) :
MulAction.orbitRel R p = (MulAction.orbitRel R M).comap Subtype.val := by
refine Setoid.ext_iff.2 (fun x y ↦ ?_)
rw [Setoid.comap_rel]
exact mem_orbit_subMul_iff
/-- Stabilizers in group SubMulAction coincide with stabilizers in the ambient space -/
@[to_additive]
theorem stabilizer_of_subMul {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
MulAction.stabilizer R m = MulAction.stabilizer R (m : M) := by
rw [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj]
exact stabilizer_of_subMul.submonoid m
end MulActionGroup
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [Module R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
theorem zero_mem (h : (p : Set M).Nonempty) : (0 : M) ∈ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
zero_smul R (x : M) ▸ p.smul_mem 0 hx
| /-- If the scalar product forms a `Module`, and the `SubMulAction` is not `⊥`, then the
subset inherits the zero. -/
instance [n_empty : Nonempty p] : Zero p where
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/SubMulAction.lean | 422 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts.
Binary biproducts are defined in `CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts`.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
open scoped Classical in
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp] theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
@[simp] theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [simp] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
noncomputable def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`. -/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`. -/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasProductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasProductsOfShape J C where
has_limit _ := hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasCoproductsOfShape J C where
has_colimit _ := hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit. -/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
|
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 521 | 524 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiTensorProduct.ProjectiveSeminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
/-!
# Injective seminorm on the tensor of a finite family of normed spaces.
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field and `E` be a family of normed `𝕜`-vector spaces `Eᵢ`,
indexed by a finite type `ι`. We define a seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which we call the
"injective seminorm". It is chosen to satisfy the following property: for every
normed `𝕜`-vector space `F`, the linear equivalence
`MultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →ₗ[𝕜] F`
expressing the universal property of the tensor product induces an isometric linear equivalence
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`.
The idea is the following: Every normed `𝕜`-vector space `F` defines a linear map
from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →ₗ[𝕜] F`, which sends `x` to the map
`f ↦ f.lift x`. Thanks to `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, this map lands in
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F`. As this last space has a natural operator (semi)norm,
we get an induced seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which, by
`PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, is bounded above by the projective seminorm
`PiTensorProduct.projectiveSeminorm`. We then take the `sup` of these seminorms as `F` varies;
as this family of seminorms is bounded, its `sup` has good properties.
In fact, we cannot take the `sup` over all normed spaces `F` because of set-theoretical issues,
so we only take spaces `F` in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. We prove in
`norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result, because every multilinear map
from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to `F` factors though a normed vector space in the same universe as
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
We then prove the universal property and the functoriality of `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` as a normed vector
space.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap`: The `𝕜`-linear map from
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending `x` to the map
`f ↦ f x`.
* `PiTensorProduct.injectiveSeminorm`: The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftEquiv`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as a continuous linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftIsometry`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as an isometric linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.tprodL`: The canonical continuous multilinear map from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ`
to `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL`: The continuous linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ`
induced by a family of continuous linear maps `Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear`: The continuous multilinear map from
`Πᵢ (Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ)` to `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ)` sending a family
`f` to `PiTensorProduct.mapL f`.
## Main results
* `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm`: The main property of the injective seminorm
on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`: for every `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` and every continuous multilinear map `f` from
`E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to a normed space `F`, we have `‖f.lift x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x `.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL_opNorm`: If `f` is a family of continuous linear maps
`fᵢ : Eᵢ →L[𝕜] Fᵢ`, then `‖PiTensorProduct.mapL f‖ ≤ ∏ i, ‖fᵢ‖`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear_opNorm` : If `F` is a normed vecteor space, then
`‖mapLMultilinear 𝕜 E F‖ ≤ 1`.
## TODO
* If all `Eᵢ` are separated and satisfy `SeparatingDual`, then the seminorm on
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` is a norm. This uses the construction of a basis of the `PiTensorProduct`, hence
depends on PR https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11156. It should probably go in a separate file.
* Adapt the remaining functoriality constructions/properties from `PiTensorProduct`.
-/
universe uι u𝕜 uE uF
variable {ι : Type uι} [Fintype ι]
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : ι → Type uE} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
variable {F : Type uF} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section seminorm
variable (F) in
/-- The linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending
`x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the map `f ↦ f.lift x`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def toDualContinuousMultilinearMap : (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →ₗ[𝕜]
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F where
toFun x := LinearMap.mkContinuous
((LinearMap.flip (lift (R := 𝕜) (s := E) (E := F)).toLinearMap x) ∘ₗ
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear)
(projectiveSeminorm x)
(fun _ ↦ by simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.flip_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
exact norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm _ _ _)
map_add' x y := by
ext _
simp only [map_add, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' a x := by
ext _
simp only [map_smul, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, RingHom.id_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
Pi.smul_apply]
theorem toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x‖ ≤ projectiveSeminorm x := by
simp only [toDualContinuousMultilinearMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk]
apply LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (apply_nonneg _ _)
/-- The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. Morally, it sends `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the
`sup` of the operator norms of the `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x`, for all
normed vector spaces `F`. In fact, we only take in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, and then
prove in `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result.
-/
noncomputable irreducible_def injectiveSeminorm : Seminorm 𝕜 (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
sSup {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)) (_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G)
(_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}
lemma dualSeminorms_bounded : BddAbove {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G),
p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))} := by
existsi projectiveSeminorm
rw [mem_upperBounds]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index]
intro p G _ _ hp
rw [hp]
intro x
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_apply (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
injectiveSeminorm x = ⨆ p : {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜
(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}, p.1 x := by
simpa only [injectiveSeminorm, Set.coe_setOf, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
using Seminorm.sSup_apply dualSeminorms_bounded
theorem norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖lift f.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x := by
/- If `F` were in `Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` (which is the type of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i`), then the
property that we want to prove would hold by definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. This is
not necessarily true, but we will show that there exists a normed vector space `G` in
`Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` and an injective isometry from `G` to `F` such that `f` factors
through a continuous multilinear map `f'` from `E = Π i, E i` to `G`, to which we can apply
the definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. The desired inequality for `f` then follows
immediately.
The idea is very simple: the multilinear map `f` corresponds by `PiTensorProduct.lift`
to a linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` to `F`, say `l`. We want to take `G` to be the image of
`l`, with the norm induced from that of `F`; to make sure that we are in the correct universe,
it is actually more convenient to take `G` equal to the coimage of `l` (i.e. the quotient
of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` by the kernel of `l`), which is canonically isomorphic to its image by
`LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange`. -/
set G := (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) ⧸ LinearMap.ker (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set G' := LinearMap.range (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set e := LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
letI := SeminormedAddCommGroup.induced G G' e
letI := NormedSpace.induced 𝕜 G G' e
set f'₀ := lift.symm (e.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ LinearMap.rangeRestrict (lift f.toMultilinearMap))
have hf'₀ : ∀ (x : Π (i : ι), E i), ‖f'₀ x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := fun x ↦ by
change ‖e (f'₀ x)‖ ≤ _
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Submodule.coe_norm,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, e, f'₀]
exact f.le_opNorm x
set f' := MultilinearMap.mkContinuous f'₀ ‖f‖ hf'₀
have hnorm : ‖f'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := (f'.opNorm_le_iff (norm_nonneg f)).mpr hf'₀
have heq : e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x) = lift f.toMultilinearMap x := by
induction x using PiTensorProduct.induction_on with
| smul_tprod =>
simp only [lift_symm, map_smul, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe,
MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, SetLike.val_smul,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, f', f'₀]
| add _ _ hx hy => simp only [map_add, Submodule.coe_add, hx, hy]
suffices h : ‖lift f'.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f'‖ * injectiveSeminorm x by
change ‖(e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x)).1‖ ≤ _ at h
rw [heq] at h
exact le_trans h (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hnorm (apply_nonneg _ _))
have hle : Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)) ≤ injectiveSeminorm := by
simp only [injectiveSeminorm]
refine le_csSup dualSeminorms_bounded ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
existsi G, inferInstance, inferInstance
rfl
refine le_trans ?_ (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hle x) (norm_nonneg f'))
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm, ← toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_apply_apply]
rw [mul_comm]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_le_projectiveSeminorm :
injectiveSeminorm (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) ≤ projectiveSeminorm := by
rw [injectiveSeminorm]
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· existsi 0
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
existsi PUnit, inferInstance, inferInstance
ext x
simp only [Seminorm.zero_apply, Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
rw [Subsingleton.elim (toDualContinuousMultilinearMap PUnit x) 0, norm_zero]
· intro p hp
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hp
obtain ⟨G, _, _, h⟩ := hp
rw [h]; intro x; simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_tprod_le (m : Π (i : ι), E i) :
injectiveSeminorm (⨂ₜ[𝕜] i, m i) ≤ ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
le_trans (injectiveSeminorm_le_projectiveSeminorm _) (projectiveSeminorm_tprod_le m)
noncomputable instance : SeminormedAddCommGroup (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup injectiveSeminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
noncomputable instance : NormedSpace 𝕜 (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) where
norm_smul_le a x := by
change injectiveSeminorm.toFun (a • x) ≤ _
rw [injectiveSeminorm.smul']
rfl
variable (𝕜 E F)
/-- The linear equivalence between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F` and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`
induced by `PiTensorProduct.lift`, for every normed space `F`.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def liftEquiv : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →L[𝕜] F where
toFun f := LinearMap.mkContinuous (lift f.toMultilinearMap) ‖f‖
(fun x ↦ norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm f x)
map_add' f g := by ext _; simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap_add, map_add,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' a f := by ext _; simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap_smul, map_smul,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', Pi.smul_apply]
invFun l := MultilinearMap.mkContinuous (lift.symm l.toLinearMap) ‖l‖ (fun x ↦ by
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
refine le_trans (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_
(norm_nonneg l))
exact injectiveSeminorm_tprod_le x)
left_inv f := by ext x; simp only [LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe]
right_inv l := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.coe_inj]
apply PiTensorProduct.ext; ext m
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply,
lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
/-- For a normed space `F`, we have constructed in `PiTensorProduct.liftEquiv` the canonical
linear equivalence between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F` and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`
(induced by `PiTensorProduct.lift`). Here we give the upgrade of this equivalence to
an isometric linear equivalence; in particular, it is a continuous linear equivalence.
-/
noncomputable def liftIsometry : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →L[𝕜] F :=
{ liftEquiv 𝕜 E F with
norm_map' := by
intro f
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simp only [liftEquiv, lift_symm, LinearEquiv.coe_mk]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _
· conv_lhs => rw [← (liftEquiv 𝕜 E F).left_inv f]
simp only [liftEquiv, lift_symm, AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, AddHom.coe_mk,
LinearEquiv.invFun_eq_symm, LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk, LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_mk]
exact MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _ }
variable {𝕜 E F}
@[simp]
| theorem liftIsometry_apply_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
liftIsometry 𝕜 E F f x = lift f.toMultilinearMap x := by
simp only [liftIsometry, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_mk, liftEquiv_apply,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply]
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/PiTensorProduct/InjectiveSeminorm.lean | 283 | 286 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Ashvni Narayanan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Degree
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Valued.ValuedField
/-!
# Function fields
This file defines a function field and the ring of integers corresponding to it.
## Main definitions
- `FunctionField Fq F` states that `F` is a function field over the (finite) field `Fq`,
i.e. it is a finite extension of the field of rational functions in one variable over `Fq`.
- `FunctionField.ringOfIntegers` defines the ring of integers corresponding to a function field
as the integral closure of `Fq[X]` in the function field.
- `FunctionField.inftyValuation` : The place at infinity on `Fq(t)` is the nonarchimedean
valuation on `Fq(t)` with uniformizer `1/t`.
- `FunctionField.FqtInfty` : The completion `Fq((t⁻¹))` of `Fq(t)` with respect to the
valuation at infinity.
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. We also omit assumptions like `Finite Fq` or
`IsScalarTower Fq[X] (FractionRing Fq[X]) F` in definitions,
adding them back in lemmas when they are needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [P. Samuel, *Algebraic Theory of Numbers*][samuel1967]
## Tags
function field, ring of integers
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial Multiplicative
variable (Fq F : Type*) [Field Fq] [Field F]
/-- `F` is a function field over the finite field `Fq` if it is a finite
extension of the field of rational functions in one variable over `Fq`.
Note that `F` can be a function field over multiple, non-isomorphic, `Fq`.
-/
abbrev FunctionField [Algebra (RatFunc Fq) F] : Prop :=
FiniteDimensional (RatFunc Fq) F
/-- `F` is a function field over `Fq` iff it is a finite extension of `Fq(t)`. -/
theorem functionField_iff (Fqt : Type*) [Field Fqt] [Algebra Fq[X] Fqt]
[IsFractionRing Fq[X] Fqt] [Algebra (RatFunc Fq) F] [Algebra Fqt F] [Algebra Fq[X] F]
[IsScalarTower Fq[X] Fqt F] [IsScalarTower Fq[X] (RatFunc Fq) F] :
FunctionField Fq F ↔ FiniteDimensional Fqt F := by
let e := IsLocalization.algEquiv Fq[X]⁰ (RatFunc Fq) Fqt
| have : ∀ (c) (x : F), e c • x = c • x := by
intro c x
rw [Algebra.smul_def, Algebra.smul_def]
congr
refine congr_fun (f := fun c => algebraMap Fqt F (e c)) ?_ c
refine IsLocalization.ext (nonZeroDivisors Fq[X]) _ _ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> intros <;>
simp only [map_one, map_mul, AlgEquiv.commutes, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· let b := Module.finBasis (RatFunc Fq) F
exact FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis (b.mapCoeffs e this)
· let b := Module.finBasis Fqt F
refine FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis (b.mapCoeffs e.symm ?_)
intro c x; convert (this (e.symm c) x).symm; simp only [e.apply_symm_apply]
namespace FunctionField
theorem algebraMap_injective [Algebra Fq[X] F] [Algebra (RatFunc Fq) F]
[IsScalarTower Fq[X] (RatFunc Fq) F] : Function.Injective (⇑(algebraMap Fq[X] F)) := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FunctionField.lean | 62 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Bounds
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
/-!
# The real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring, and a conditionally complete linear order.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Pointwise CauSeq
namespace Real
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ} {a : ℝ}
instance instArchimedean : Archimedean ℝ :=
archimedean_iff_rat_le.2 fun x =>
Real.ind_mk x fun f =>
let ⟨M, _, H⟩ := f.bounded' 0
⟨M, mk_le_of_forall_le ⟨0, fun i _ => Rat.cast_le.2 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H i)).2⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : FloorRing ℝ :=
Archimedean.floorRing _
theorem isCauSeq_iff_lift {f : ℕ → ℚ} : IsCauSeq abs f ↔ IsCauSeq abs fun i => (f i : ℝ) where
mp H ε ε0 :=
let ⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ := exists_pos_rat_lt ε0
(H _ δ0).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp; exact lt_trans (mod_cast hi _ ij) δε
mpr H ε ε0 :=
(H _ (Rat.cast_pos.2 ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp at hi; exact mod_cast hi _ ij
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → ℚ) (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| < ε) :
∃ h', Real.mk ⟨f, h'⟩ = x :=
⟨isCauSeq_iff_lift.2 (CauSeq.of_near _ (const abs x) h),
sub_eq_zero.1 <|
abs_eq_zero.1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg _)) fun _ε ε0 =>
mk_near_of_forall_near <| (h _ ε0).imp fun _i h j ij => le_of_lt (h j ij)⟩
theorem exists_floor (x : ℝ) : ∃ ub : ℤ, (ub : ℝ) ≤ x ∧ ∀ z : ℤ, (z : ℝ) ≤ x → z ≤ ub :=
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_gt x
⟨n, fun _ h' => Int.cast_le.1 <| le_trans h' <| le_of_lt hn⟩)
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_lt x
⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩)
theorem exists_isLUB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddAbove s) : ∃ x, IsLUB s x := by
rcases hne, hbdd with ⟨⟨L, hL⟩, ⟨U, hU⟩⟩
have : ∀ d : ℕ, BddAbove { m : ℤ | ∃ y ∈ s, (m : ℝ) ≤ y * d } := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_int_gt U
refine fun d => ⟨k * d, fun z h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine Int.cast_le.1 (hy.trans ?_)
push_cast
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((hU yS).trans hk.le) d.cast_nonneg
choose f hf using fun d : ℕ =>
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd (this d) ⟨⌊L * d⌋, L, hL, Int.floor_le _⟩
have hf₁ : ∀ n > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, ((f n / n : ℚ) : ℝ) ≤ y := fun n n0 =>
let ⟨y, yS, hy⟩ := (hf n).1
⟨y, yS, by simpa using (div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _)).2 hy⟩
have hf₂ : ∀ n > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, (y - ((n : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) < (f n / n : ℚ) := by
intro n n0 y yS
have := (Int.sub_one_lt_floor _).trans_le (Int.cast_le.2 <| (hf n).2 _ ⟨y, yS, Int.floor_le _⟩)
simp only [Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_natCast, gt_iff_lt]
rwa [lt_div_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _), sub_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀]
exact ne_of_gt (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0)
have hg : IsCauSeq abs (fun n => f n / n : ℕ → ℚ) := by
intro ε ε0
suffices ∀ j ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, ∀ k ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, (f j / j - f k / k : ℚ) < ε by
refine ⟨_, fun j ij => abs_lt.2 ⟨?_, this _ ij _ le_rfl⟩⟩
rw [neg_lt, neg_sub]
exact this _ le_rfl _ ij
intro j ij k ik
replace ij := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ij)
replace ik := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ik)
have j0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ij)
have k0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ik)
rcases hf₁ _ j0 with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((Rat.cast_lt (K := ℝ)).1 ?_) ((inv_le_comm₀ ε0 (Nat.cast_pos.2 k0)).1 ik)
simpa using sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt hy <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <| hf₂ _ k0 _ yS)
let g : CauSeq ℚ abs := ⟨fun n => f n / n, hg⟩
refine ⟨mk g, ⟨fun x xS => ?_, fun y h => ?_⟩⟩
· refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun z xz => ?_
obtain ⟨K, hK⟩ := exists_nat_gt (x - z)⁻¹
refine le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨K, fun n nK => ?_⟩
replace xz := sub_pos.2 xz
replace hK := hK.le.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 nK)
have n0 : 0 < n := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 xz).trans_le hK)
refine le_trans ?_ (hf₂ _ n0 _ xS).le
rwa [le_sub_comm, inv_le_comm₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _) xz]
· exact
mk_le_of_forall_le
⟨1, fun n n1 =>
let ⟨x, xS, hx⟩ := hf₁ _ n1
le_trans hx (h xS)⟩
/-- A nonempty, bounded below set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound. -/
theorem exists_isGLB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddBelow s) : ∃ x, IsGLB s x := by
have hne' : (-s).Nonempty := Set.nonempty_neg.mpr hne
have hbdd' : BddAbove (-s) := bddAbove_neg.mpr hbdd
use -Classical.choose (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
rw [← isLUB_neg]
exact Classical.choose_spec (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℝ :=
⟨fun s => if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def (s : Set ℝ) :
sSup s = if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem isLUB_sSup (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
simp only [sSup_def, dif_pos (And.intro h₁ h₂)]
apply Classical.choose_spec
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℝ :=
⟨fun s => -sSup (-s)⟩
theorem sInf_def (s : Set ℝ) : sInf s = -sSup (-s) := rfl
protected theorem isGLB_sInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_def, ← isLUB_neg', neg_neg]
exact Real.isLUB_sSup h₁.neg h₂.neg
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ℝ where
__ := Real.linearOrder
__ := Real.lattice
le_csSup s a hs ha := (Real.isLUB_sSup ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
csSup_le s a hs ha := (Real.isLUB_sSup hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csInf_le s a hs ha := (Real.isGLB_sInf ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
le_csInf s a hs ha := (Real.isGLB_sInf hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs := by simp [hs, sSup_def]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs := by simp [hs, sInf_def, sSup_def]
theorem lt_sInf_add_pos (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < sInf s + ε :=
exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
theorem add_neg_lt_sSup (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε < 0) : ∃ a ∈ s, sSup s + ε < a :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h <| add_lt_iff_neg_left.2 hε
theorem sInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (h' : s.Nonempty) :
sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x ∈ s, x < a + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
constructor <;> intro H ε ε_pos
· exact exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h' (H ε ε_pos)
· rcases H ε ε_pos with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact csInf_lt_of_lt h x_in hx
theorem le_sSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (h' : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ ε, ε < 0 → ∃ x ∈ s, a + ε < x := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
refine ⟨fun H ε ε_neg => ?_, fun H ε ε_pos => ?_⟩
· exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h' (lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp (H _ (neg_pos.mpr ε_neg)))
· rcases H _ (neg_lt_zero.mpr ε_pos) with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp (lt_csSup_of_lt h x_in hx)
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 :=
dif_neg <| by simp
@[simp] lemma iSup_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) : ⨆ i, f i = 0 := by
dsimp [iSup]
convert Real.sSup_empty
rw [Set.range_eq_empty_iff]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem iSup_const_zero : ⨆ _ : ι, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· exact Real.iSup_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciSup_const
lemma sSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = 0 := dif_neg fun h => hs h.2
lemma iSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (Set.range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = 0 := sSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
theorem sSup_univ : sSup (@Set.univ ℝ) = 0 := Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove not_bddAbove_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [sInf_def, sSup_empty]
@[simp] nonrec lemma iInf_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) : ⨅ i, f i = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_const_zero : ⨅ _ : ι, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· exact Real.iInf_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciInf_const
theorem sInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.2 <| sSup_of_not_bddAbove <| mt bddAbove_neg.1 hs
theorem iInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (Set.range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = 0 :=
sInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are at most some nonnegative number `a` to show that `sSup s ≤ a`.
See also `csSup_le`. -/
protected lemma sSup_le (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
exacts [sSup_empty.trans_le ha, csSup_le hs' hs]
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty, it suffices to show
that all values of `f` are at most some nonnegative number `a` to show that `⨆ i, f i ≤ a`.
See also `ciSup_le`. -/
protected lemma iSup_le (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⨆ i, f i ≤ a :=
Real.sSup_le (Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf) ha
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are at least some nonpositive number `a` to show that `a ≤ sInf s`.
See also `le_csInf`. -/
protected lemma le_sInf (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x) (ha : a ≤ 0) : a ≤ sInf s := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
exacts [ha.trans_eq sInf_empty.symm, le_csInf hs' hs]
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty, it suffices to show
that all values of `f` are at least some nonpositive number `a` to show that `a ≤ ⨅ i, f i`.
See also `le_ciInf`. -/
protected lemma le_iInf (hf : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) (ha : a ≤ 0) : a ≤ ⨅ i, f i :=
Real.le_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf) ha
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are nonpositive to show that `sSup s ≤ 0`. -/
lemma sSup_nonpos (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ 0) : sSup s ≤ 0 := Real.sSup_le hs le_rfl
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonpositive to show that `⨆ i, f i ≤ 0`. -/
lemma iSup_nonpos (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ 0) : ⨆ i, f i ≤ 0 := Real.iSup_le hf le_rfl
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ sInf s`. -/
lemma sInf_nonneg (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sInf s := Real.le_sInf hs le_rfl
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ ⨅ i, f i`. -/
lemma iInf_nonneg (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ iInf f := Real.le_iInf hf le_rfl
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's unbounded above, it suffices to show that `s`
contains a nonnegative element to show that `0 ≤ sSup s`. -/
lemma sSup_nonneg' (hs : ∃ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sSup s := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ := hs
exact dite _ (fun h ↦ le_csSup_of_le h hxs hx) fun h ↦ (sSup_of_not_bddAbove h).ge
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the real-valued function `f` is unbounded above,
it suffices to show that `f` takes a nonnegative value to show that `0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i`. -/
lemma iSup_nonneg' (hf : ∃ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i := sSup_nonneg' <| Set.exists_range_iff.2 hf
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's unbounded below, it suffices to show that `s`
contains a nonpositive element to show that `sInf s ≤ 0`. -/
lemma sInf_nonpos' (hs : ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ 0) : sInf s ≤ 0 := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ := hs
exact dite _ (fun h ↦ csInf_le_of_le h hxs hx) fun h ↦ (sInf_of_not_bddBelow h).le
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the real-valued function `f` is unbounded below,
it suffices to show that `f` takes a nonpositive value to show that `0 ≤ ⨅ i, f i`. -/
lemma iInf_nonpos' (hf : ∃ i, f i ≤ 0) : ⨅ i, f i ≤ 0 := sInf_nonpos' <| Set.exists_range_iff.2 hf
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's either empty or unbounded above,
it suffices to show that all elements of `s` are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ sSup s`. -/
lemma sSup_nonneg (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sSup s := by
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact sSup_empty.ge
· exact sSup_nonneg' ⟨x, hx, hs _ hx⟩
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty or unbounded above,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i`. -/
lemma iSup_nonneg (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i := sSup_nonneg <| Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's either empty or unbounded below,
it suffices to show that all elements of `s` are nonpositive to show that `sInf s ≤ 0`. -/
lemma sInf_nonpos (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ 0) : sInf s ≤ 0 := by
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact sInf_empty.le
· exact sInf_nonpos' ⟨x, hx, hs _ hx⟩
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty or unbounded below,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonpositive to show that `0 ≤ ⨅ i, f i`. -/
lemma iInf_nonpos (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ 0) : ⨅ i, f i ≤ 0 := sInf_nonpos <| Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem sInf_le_sSup (s : Set ℝ) (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : BddAbove s) : sInf s ≤ sSup s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sInf_empty, sSup_empty]
· exact csInf_le_csSup h₁ h₂ hne
theorem cauSeq_converges (f : CauSeq ℝ abs) : ∃ x, f ≈ const abs x := by
let s := {x : ℝ | const abs x < f}
have lb : ∃ x, x ∈ s := exists_lt f
have ub' : ∀ x, f < const abs x → ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := fun x h y yS =>
le_of_lt <| const_lt.1 <| CauSeq.lt_trans yS h
have ub : ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := (exists_gt f).imp ub'
refine ⟨sSup s, ((lt_total _ _).resolve_left fun h => ?_).resolve_right fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨ε, ε0, i, ih⟩
refine (csSup_le lb (ub' _ ?_)).not_lt (sub_lt_self _ (half_pos ε0))
refine ⟨_, half_pos ε0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, sub_right_comm, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_halves]
exact ih _ ij
· rcases h with ⟨ε, ε0, i, ih⟩
refine (le_csSup ub ?_).not_lt ((lt_add_iff_pos_left _).2 (half_pos ε0))
refine ⟨_, half_pos ε0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, add_comm, ← sub_sub, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_halves]
exact ih _ ij
instance : CauSeq.IsComplete ℝ abs :=
⟨cauSeq_converges⟩
open Set
theorem iInf_Ioi_eq_iInf_rat_gt {f : ℝ → ℝ} (x : ℝ) (hf : BddBelow (f '' Ioi x))
(hf_mono : Monotone f) : ⨅ r : Ioi x, f r = ⨅ q : { q' : ℚ // x < q' }, f q := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· have : Nonempty { r' : ℚ // x < ↑r' } := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt x
exact ⟨⟨r, hrx⟩⟩
refine le_ciInf fun r => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyr⟩ := exists_rat_btwn r.prop
| refine ciInf_set_le hf (hxy.trans ?_)
exact_mod_cast hyr
· refine le_ciInf fun q => ?_
have hq := q.prop
rw [mem_Ioi] at hq
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyq⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hq
refine (ciInf_le ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· refine ⟨hf.some, fun z => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
suffices hfu : f u ∈ f '' Ioi x from hf.choose_spec hfu
exact ⟨u, u.prop, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨y, hxy⟩
· refine hf_mono (le_trans ?_ hyq.le)
norm_cast
theorem not_bddAbove_coe : ¬ (BddAbove <| range (fun (x : ℚ) ↦ (x : ℝ))) := by
dsimp only [BddAbove, upperBounds]
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
ext
simpa using exists_rat_gt _
theorem not_bddBelow_coe : ¬ (BddBelow <| range (fun (x : ℚ) ↦ (x : ℝ))) := by
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean | 332 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,759 | 2,760 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
In the above, the pairing function is primitive recursive by definition.
This deviates from the textbook definition of primitive recursive functions,
which instead work with *`n`-ary* functions. We formalize the textbook
definition in `Nat.Primrec'`. `Nat.Primrec'.prim_iff` then proves it is
equivalent to our chosen formulation. For more discussionn of this and
other design choices in this formalization, see [carneiro2019].
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions `f : ℕ → ℕ`
- `Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Primcodable α`: well-behaved encoding of `α` into `ℕ`, i.e. one such that roundtripping through
the encoding functions adds no computational power
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is, essentially, an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive.
However, such a definition is circular.
Instead, we ask that the composition of `decode : ℕ → Option α` with
`encode : Option α → ℕ` is primitive recursive. Said composition is
the identity function, restricted to the image of `encode`.
Thus, in a way, the added requirement ensures that no predicates
can be smuggled in through a cunning choice of the subset of `ℕ` into
which the type is encoded. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
| encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 242 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CatCommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Predicate
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
/-!
# Localization of adjunctions
In this file, we show that if we have an adjunction `adj : G ⊣ F` such that both
functors `G : C₁ ⥤ C₂` and `F : C₂ ⥤ C₁` induce functors
`G' : D₁ ⥤ D₂` and `F' : D₂ ⥤ D₁` on localized categories, i.e. that we
have localization functors `L₁ : C₁ ⥤ D₁` and `L₂ : C₂ ⥤ D₂` with respect
to morphism properties `W₁` and `W₂` respectively, and 2-commutative diagrams
`[CatCommSq G L₁ L₂ G']` and `[CatCommSq F L₂ L₁ F']`, then we have an
induced adjunction `Adjunction.localization L₁ W₁ L₂ W₂ G' F' : G' ⊣ F'`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Localization Category
namespace Adjunction
variable {C₁ C₂ D₁ D₂ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category D₁] [Category D₂]
{G : C₁ ⥤ C₂} {F : C₂ ⥤ C₁} (adj : G ⊣ F)
section
variable (L₁ : C₁ ⥤ D₁) (W₁ : MorphismProperty C₁) [L₁.IsLocalization W₁]
(L₂ : C₂ ⥤ D₂) (W₂ : MorphismProperty C₂) [L₂.IsLocalization W₂]
(G' : D₁ ⥤ D₂) (F' : D₂ ⥤ D₁)
[CatCommSq G L₁ L₂ G'] [CatCommSq F L₂ L₁ F']
namespace Localization
/-- Auxiliary definition of the unit morphism for the adjunction `Adjunction.localization` -/
noncomputable def ε : 𝟭 D₁ ⟶ G' ⋙ F' := by
letI : Lifting L₁ W₁ ((G ⋙ F) ⋙ L₁) (G' ⋙ F') :=
Lifting.mk (CatCommSq.hComp G F L₁ L₂ L₁ G' F').iso'.symm
exact Localization.liftNatTrans L₁ W₁ L₁ ((G ⋙ F) ⋙ L₁) (𝟭 D₁) (G' ⋙ F')
(whiskerRight adj.unit L₁)
| lemma ε_app (X₁ : C₁) :
(ε adj L₁ W₁ L₂ G' F').app (L₁.obj X₁) =
L₁.map (adj.unit.app X₁) ≫ (CatCommSq.iso F L₂ L₁ F').hom.app (G.obj X₁) ≫
F'.map ((CatCommSq.iso G L₁ L₂ G').hom.app X₁) := by
letI : Lifting L₁ W₁ ((G ⋙ F) ⋙ L₁) (G' ⋙ F') :=
Lifting.mk (CatCommSq.hComp G F L₁ L₂ L₁ G' F').iso'.symm
simp only [ε, liftNatTrans_app, Lifting.iso, Iso.symm,
Functor.id_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Lifting.id_iso', Functor.rightUnitor_hom_app,
whiskerRight_app, CatCommSq.hComp_iso'_hom_app, id_comp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Adjunction.lean | 49 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cyclic groups
A group `G` is called cyclic if there exists an element `g : G` such that every element of `G` is of
the form `g ^ n` for some `n : ℕ`. This file only deals with the predicate on a group to be cyclic.
For the concrete cyclic group of order `n`, see `Data.ZMod.Basic`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclic` is a predicate on a group stating that the group is cyclic.
## Main statements
* `isCyclic_of_prime_card` proves that a finite group of prime order is cyclic.
* `isSimpleGroup_of_prime_card`, `IsSimpleGroup.isCyclic`,
and `IsSimpleGroup.prime_card` classify finite simple abelian groups.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_card`: For a finite cyclic group `G`, the exponent is equal to
the group's cardinality.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_zero_of_infinite`: Infinite cyclic groups have exponent zero.
* `IsCyclic.iff_exponent_eq_card`: A finite commutative group is cyclic iff its exponent
is equal to its cardinality.
## Tags
cyclic group
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
variable {α G G' : Type*} {a : α}
section Cyclic
open Subgroup
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.exists_generator [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g :=
exists_zpow_surjective α
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top [Group α] : IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, zpowers g = ⊤ := by
simp only [eq_top_iff', mem_zpowers_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Subgroup.isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top [Group α] (H : Subgroup α) :
IsCyclic H ↔ ∃ g : α, Subgroup.zpowers g = H := by
rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top]
simp_rw [← (map_injective H.subtype_injective).eq_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_map,
H.range_subtype, MonoidHom.map_zpowers, Subtype.exists, coe_subtype, exists_prop]
exact exists_congr fun g ↦ and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦ h ▸ mem_zpowers g
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) isCyclic_of_subsingleton [Group α] [Subsingleton α] : IsCyclic α :=
⟨⟨1, fun _ => ⟨0, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCyclic_multiplicative_iff [SubNegMonoid α] :
IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) ↔ IsAddCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isCyclic_multiplicative [AddGroup α] [IsAddCyclic α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) :=
isCyclic_multiplicative_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem isAddCyclic_additive_iff [DivInvMonoid α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) ↔ IsCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isAddCyclic_additive [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) :=
isAddCyclic_additive_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[to_additive]
instance IsCyclic.commutative [Group α] [IsCyclic α] :
Std.Commutative (· * · : α → α → α) where
comm x y :=
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
let ⟨_, hx⟩ := hg x
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hg y
hy ▸ hx ▸ zpow_mul_comm _ _ _
/-- A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have a better
proof of `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have
a better proof of `AddCommGroup`."]
def IsCyclic.commGroup [hg : Group α] [IsCyclic α] : CommGroup α :=
{ hg with mul_comm := commutative.comm }
instance [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [IsCyclic H] : IsMulCommutative H :=
⟨IsCyclic.commutative⟩
variable [Group α] [Group G] [Group G']
/-- A non-cyclic multiplicative group is non-trivial. -/
@[to_additive "A non-cyclic additive group is non-trivial."]
theorem Nontrivial.of_not_isCyclic (nc : ¬IsCyclic α) : Nontrivial α := by
contrapose! nc
exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton _ _ (not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp nc)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_cyclic [h : IsCyclic G] (σ : G →* G) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ g : G, σ g = g ^ m := by
obtain ⟨h, hG⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hG (σ h)
refine ⟨m, fun g => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hG g
rw [MonoidHom.map_zpow, ← hm, ← zpow_mul, ← zpow_mul']
@[to_additive]
lemma isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard [Finite α] :
IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
simp_rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top, ← card_eq_iff_eq_top, Nat.card_zpowers]
@[to_additive]
lemma isCyclic_iff_exists_natCard_le_orderOf [Finite α] :
IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, Nat.card α ≤ orderOf g := by
rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard]
apply exists_congr
intro g
exact ⟨Eq.ge, le_antisymm orderOf_le_card⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias isCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard := isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias isAddCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard := isAddCyclic_iff_exists_addOrderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias IsCyclic.iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard_of_Fintype :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias IsAddCyclic.iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard_of_Fintype :=
isAddCyclic_iff_exists_addOrderOf_eq_natCard
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card [Finite α] (x : α) (hx : orderOf x = Nat.card α) :
IsCyclic α :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard.mpr ⟨x, hx⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_card_le_orderOf [Finite α] (x : α) (hx : Nat.card α ≤ orderOf x) :
IsCyclic α :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_natCard_le_orderOf.mpr ⟨x, hx⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
(H : Subgroup G) [hp : Fact (Nat.card G).Prime] : H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero hp.1.ne_zero
have := card_subgroup_dvd_card H
rwa [Nat.dvd_prime hp.1, ← eq_bot_iff_card, card_eq_iff_eq_top] at this
/-- Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group. -/
@[to_additive "Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group."]
theorem zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Nat.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : zpowers g = ⊤ := by
subst h
have := (zpowers g).eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
rwa [zpowers_eq_bot, or_iff_right hg] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_zpowers_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ zpowers g := by
simp_rw [zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card h hg, Subgroup.mem_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ Submonoid.powers g := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (h ▸ hp.1.ne_zero)
rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg
@[to_additive]
theorem powers_eq_top_of_prime_card {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Nat.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : Submonoid.powers g = ⊤ := by
ext x
simp [mem_powers_of_prime_card h hg]
/-- A finite group of prime order is cyclic. -/
@[to_additive "A finite group of prime order is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card α = p) : IsCyclic α := by
have : Finite α := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (h ▸ hp.1.ne_zero)
have : Nontrivial α := Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp (h ▸ hp.1.one_lt)
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : α, g ≠ 1 := exists_ne 1
exact ⟨g, fun g' ↦ mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg⟩
/-- A finite group of order dividing a prime is cyclic. -/
@[to_additive "A finite group of order dividing a prime is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_card_dvd_prime {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card α ∣ p) : IsCyclic α := by
rcases (Nat.dvd_prime hp.out).mp h with h | h
· exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton α _ (Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mp h).1
· exact isCyclic_of_prime_card h
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_surjective {F : Type*} [hH : IsCyclic G']
[FunLike F G' G] [MonoidHomClass F G' G] (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
IsCyclic G := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hH
refine ⟨f x, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf a
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hx a
exact ⟨n, (map_zpow _ _ _).symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers {g : α} (hx : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) :
orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
rw [← Nat.card_zpowers, (zpowers g).eq_top_iff'.mpr hx, card_top]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-15")]
alias orderOf_generator_eq_natCard := orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-15")]
alias addOrderOf_generator_eq_natCard := addOrderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic [G_cyclic : IsCyclic G]
{k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Nat.card G) : ∃ a : G, a ^ k ≠ 1 := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (Nat.ne_zero_of_lt k_lt_card_G)
rcases G_cyclic with ⟨a, ha⟩
use a
contrapose! k_lt_card_G
convert orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt k_lt_card_G
rw [← Nat.card_zpowers, eq_comm, card_eq_iff_eq_top, eq_top_iff]
exact fun x _ ↦ ha x
@[to_additive]
theorem Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Infinite α] {g : α}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) : orderOf g = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers h, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
@[to_additive]
instance Bot.isCyclic : IsCyclic (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => ⟨0, Subtype.eq <| (zpow_zero (1 : α)).trans <| Eq.symm (Subgroup.mem_bot.1 x.2)⟩⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Subgroup.isCyclic [IsCyclic α] (H : Subgroup α) : IsCyclic H :=
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
if hx : ∃ x : α, x ∈ H ∧ x ≠ (1 : α) then
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := hx
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ g ^ n ∈ H :=
⟨k.natAbs,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => hx₂ <| by
rw [← hk, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h, zpow_zero], by
rcases k with k | k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natAbs_cast k, ← zpow_natCast, ← Int.ofNat_eq_coe, hk]
exact hx₁
· rw [Int.natAbs_negSucc, ← Subgroup.inv_mem_iff H]; simp_all⟩
⟨⟨⟨g ^ Nat.find hex, (Nat.find_spec hex).2⟩, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hk₂ : g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) ∈ H := by
rw [zpow_mul]
apply H.zpow_mem
exact mod_cast (Nat.find_spec hex).2
have hk₃ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex : ℤ) ∈ H :=
(Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right H hk₂).1 <| by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.emod_add_ediv, hk]; exact hx
have hk₄ : k % Nat.find hex = (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs := by
rw [Int.natAbs_of_nonneg
(Int.emod_nonneg _ (Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))]
have hk₅ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs ∈ H := by rwa [← zpow_natCast, ← hk₄]
have hk₆ : (k % (Nat.find hex : ℤ)).natAbs = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h =>
Nat.find_min hex
(Int.ofNat_lt.1 <| by
rw [← hk₄]; exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))
⟨Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h, hk₅⟩
⟨k / (Nat.find hex : ℤ),
Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
(by
suffices g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) = x by simpa [zpow_mul]
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel'
(Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero (Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp hk₆)),
hk])⟩⟩⟩
else by
have : H = (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
Subgroup.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => by simp at *; tauto, fun h => by rw [Subgroup.mem_bot.1 h]; exact H.one_mem⟩
subst this; infer_instance
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_injective [IsCyclic G'] (f : G →* G') (hf : Function.Injective f) :
IsCyclic G :=
isCyclic_of_surjective (MonoidHom.ofInjective hf).symm (MonoidHom.ofInjective hf).symm.surjective
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.isCyclic_of_le {H H' : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ H') [IsCyclic H'] : IsCyclic H :=
isCyclic_of_injective (Subgroup.inclusion h) (Subgroup.inclusion_injective h)
open Finset Nat
section Classical
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive IsAddCyclic.card_nsmul_eq_zero_le]
theorem IsCyclic.card_pow_eq_one_le [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [IsCyclic α] {n : ℕ} (hn0 : 0 < n) :
#{a : α | a ^ n = 1} ≤ n :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
calc
#{a : α | a ^ n = 1} ≤
#(zpowers (g ^ (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α))) : Set α).toFinset :=
card_le_card fun x hx =>
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := show x ∈ Submonoid.powers g from mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.2 <| hg x
Set.mem_toFinset.2
⟨(m / (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) : ℕ), by
dsimp at hm
have hgmn : g ^ (m * Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) = 1 := by
rw [pow_mul, hm, ← pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff]; exact (mem_filter.1 hx).2
dsimp only
rw [zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left', hm]
refine Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (gcd_pos_of_pos_left (Fintype.card α) hn0) ?_
conv_lhs =>
rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg]
exact orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hgmn⟩
_ ≤ n := by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := Nat.gcd_dvd_right n (Fintype.card α)
have hm0 : 0 < m :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hm0 => by
rw [hm0, mul_zero, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hm
exact hm.elim' 1
simp only [Set.toFinset_card, SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers, orderOf_pow g, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg,
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
nth_rw 2 [hm]; nth_rw 3 [hm]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ hn0), gcd_mul_left_left, hm,
Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hm0]
exact le_of_dvd hn0 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)
end Classical
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.exists_monoid_generator [Finite α] [IsCyclic α] :
∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y ∈ Submonoid.powers x := by
simp_rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact IsCyclic.exists_generator
@[to_additive]
lemma IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard [h : IsCyclic α] : ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h.exists_generator
use g
rw [← card_zpowers g, (eq_top_iff' (zpowers g)).mpr hg]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
variable (G) in
/-- A distributive action of a monoid on a finite cyclic group of order `n` factors through an
action on `ZMod n`. -/
noncomputable def MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHomZModOfIsCyclic (M : Type*) [Monoid M]
[IsCyclic G] [MulDistribMulAction M G] {n : ℕ} (hn : Nat.card G = n) : M →* ZMod n where
toFun m := (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G m).map_cyclic.choose
map_one' := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard (α := G)
rw [← Int.cast_one, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, ← hn, ← hg, ← zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq,
| zpow_one, ← (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G 1).map_cyclic.choose_spec,
MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply, one_smul]
map_mul' m n := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard (α := G)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Cyclic.lean | 371 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 887 | 889 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson, Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Languages
This file contains the definition and operations on formal languages over an alphabet.
Note that "strings" are implemented as lists over the alphabet.
Union and concatenation define a [Kleene algebra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene_algebra)
over the languages.
In addition to that, we define a reversal of a language and prove that it behaves well
with respect to other language operations.
## Notation
* `l + m`: union of languages `l` and `m`
* `l * m`: language of strings `x ++ y` such that `x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`
* `l ^ n`: language of strings consisting of `n` members of `l` concatenated together
* `1`: language consisting of only the empty string.
This is because it is the unit of the `*` operator.
* `l∗`: Kleene's star – language of strings consisting of arbitrarily many
members of `l` concatenated together
(Note that this is the Unicode asterisk `∗`, and not the more common star `*`)
## Main definitions
* `Language α`: a set of strings over the alphabet `α`
* `l.map f`: transform a language `l` over `α` into a language over `β`
by translating through `f : α → β`
## Main theorems
* `Language.self_eq_mul_add_iff`: Arden's lemma – if a language `l` satisfies the equation
`l = m * l + n`, and `m` doesn't contain the empty string,
then `l` is the language `m∗ * n`
-/
open List Set Computability
universe v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A language is a set of strings over an alphabet. -/
def Language (α) :=
Set (List α)
namespace Language
instance : Membership (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.Mem⟩
instance : Singleton (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.singleton⟩
instance : Insert (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.insert⟩
instance instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Language α) :=
Set.instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra
variable {l m : Language α} {a b x : List α}
/-- Zero language has no elements. -/
instance : Zero (Language α) :=
⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- `1 : Language α` contains only one element `[]`. -/
instance : One (Language α) :=
⟨{[]}⟩
instance : Inhabited (Language α) := ⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- The sum of two languages is their union. -/
instance : Add (Language α) :=
⟨((· ∪ ·) : Set (List α) → Set (List α) → Set (List α))⟩
/-- The product of two languages `l` and `m` is the language made of the strings `x ++ y` where
`x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`. -/
instance : Mul (Language α) :=
⟨image2 (· ++ ·)⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Language α) = (∅ : Set _) :=
rfl
theorem one_def : (1 : Language α) = ({[]} : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem add_def (l m : Language α) : l + m = (l ∪ m : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem mul_def (l m : Language α) : l * m = image2 (· ++ ·) l m :=
rfl
/-- The Kleene star of a language `L` is the set of all strings which can be written by
concatenating strings from `L`. -/
instance : KStar (Language α) := ⟨fun l ↦ {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l}⟩
lemma kstar_def (l : Language α) : l∗ = {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l} :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {l m : Language α} (h : ∀ (x : List α), x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ m) : l = m :=
Set.ext h
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (x : List α) : x ∉ (0 : Language α) :=
id
@[simp]
theorem mem_one (x : List α) : x ∈ (1 : Language α) ↔ x = [] := by rfl
theorem nil_mem_one : [] ∈ (1 : Language α) :=
Set.mem_singleton _
theorem mem_add (l m : Language α) (x : List α) : x ∈ l + m ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ m :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mul : x ∈ l * m ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, ∃ b ∈ m, a ++ b = x :=
mem_image2
theorem append_mem_mul : a ∈ l → b ∈ m → a ++ b ∈ l * m :=
mem_image2_of_mem
theorem mem_kstar : x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
theorem join_mem_kstar {L : List (List α)} (h : ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l) : L.flatten ∈ l∗ :=
⟨L, rfl, h⟩
theorem nil_mem_kstar (l : Language α) : [] ∈ l∗ :=
⟨[], rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
instance instSemiring : Semiring (Language α) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := union_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := empty_union
add_zero := union_empty
add_comm := union_comm
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := image2_assoc append_assoc
zero_mul _ := image2_empty_left
mul_zero _ := image2_empty_right
one := 1
one_mul l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
mul_one l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
natCast n := if n = 0 then 0 else 1
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by cases n <;> simp [Nat.cast, add_def, zero_def]
left_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_right
right_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem add_self (l : Language α) : l + l = l :=
sup_idem _
/-- Maps the alphabet of a language. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Language α →+* Language β where
toFun := image (List.map f)
map_zero' := image_empty _
map_one' := image_singleton
map_add' := image_union _
map_mul' _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| fun _ _ => map_append
@[simp]
theorem map_id (l : Language α) : map id l = l := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l := by
simp [map, image_image]
lemma mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty {x : List α} :
x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, h⟩
refine ⟨S.filter fun l ↦ !List.isEmpty l,
by simp [List.flatten_filter_not_isEmpty], fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [mem_filter, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, isEmpty_eq_false_iff, ne_eq] at hy
exact ⟨h y hy.1, hy.2⟩
· rintro ⟨S, hx, h⟩
exact ⟨S, hx, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).1⟩
theorem kstar_def_nonempty (l : Language α) :
l∗ = { x | ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] } := by
ext x; apply mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty
theorem le_iff (l m : Language α) : l ≤ m ↔ l + m = m :=
sup_eq_right.symm
theorem le_mul_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ * l₂ ≤ m₁ * m₂ := by
intro h₁ h₂ x hx
simp only [mul_def, exists_and_left, mem_image2, image_prod] at hx ⊢
tauto
theorem le_add_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ + l₂ ≤ m₁ + m₂ :=
sup_le_sup
theorem mem_iSup {ι : Sort v} {l : ι → Language α} {x : List α} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, l i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ l i :=
mem_iUnion
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) * m = ⨆ i, l i * m :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m * ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m * l i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) + m = ⨆ i, l i + m :=
iSup_sup
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m + ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m + l i :=
sup_iSup
theorem mem_pow {l : Language α} {x : List α} {n : ℕ} :
x ∈ l ^ n ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ S.length = n ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing x
· simp only [mem_one, pow_zero, length_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨[], rfl, rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
· rintro ⟨_, rfl, rfl, _⟩
rfl
· simp only [pow_succ', mem_mul, ihn]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: S, rfl, rfl, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨ha, hS⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, S⟩, rfl, hn, hS⟩ <;> cases hn
rw [forall_mem_cons] at hS
exact ⟨a, hS.1, _, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS.2⟩, rfl⟩
theorem kstar_eq_iSup_pow (l : Language α) : l∗ = ⨆ i : ℕ, l ^ i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_kstar, mem_iSup, mem_pow]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, hS⟩
exact ⟨_, S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨_, S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩
exact ⟨S, rfl, hS⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_kstar (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map f l∗ = (map f l)∗ := by
rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, kstar_eq_iSup_pow]
simp_rw [← map_pow]
exact image_iUnion
theorem mul_self_kstar_comm (l : Language α) : l∗ * l = l * l∗ := by
simp only [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, mul_iSup, iSup_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar (l : Language α) : 1 + l * l∗ = l∗ := by
simp only [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, mul_iSup, ← pow_succ', ← pow_zero l]
exact sup_iSup_nat_succ _
@[simp]
theorem one_add_kstar_mul_self_eq_kstar (l : Language α) : 1 + l∗ * l = l∗ := by
rw [mul_self_kstar_comm, one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar]
instance : KleeneAlgebra (Language α) :=
{ instSemiring, instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra with
kstar := fun L ↦ L∗,
one_le_kstar := fun a _ hl ↦ ⟨[], hl, by simp⟩,
mul_kstar_le_kstar := fun a ↦ (one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar a).le.trans' le_sup_right,
kstar_mul_le_kstar := fun a ↦ (one_add_kstar_mul_self_eq_kstar a).le.trans' le_sup_right,
kstar_mul_le_self := fun l m h ↦ by
rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, iSup_mul]
refine iSup_le (fun n ↦ ?_)
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc (l^n) l m]
exact le_trans (le_mul_congr le_rfl h) ih,
mul_kstar_le_self := fun l m h ↦ by
rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le (fun n ↦ ?_)
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc m (l^n) l]
exact le_trans (le_mul_congr ih le_rfl) h }
/-- **Arden's lemma** -/
theorem self_eq_mul_add_iff {l m n : Language α} (hm : [] ∉ m) : l = m * l + n ↔ l = m∗ * n where
mp h := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
induction' hlen : x.length using Nat.strong_induction_on with _ ih generalizing x
subst hlen
rw [h] at hx
obtain hx | hx := hx
· obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ := mem_mul.mp hx
rw [length_append] at ih
have hal : 0 < a.length := length_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ha hm
specialize ih b.length (Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos.mpr hal) hb rfl
rw [← one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar, one_add_mul, mul_assoc]
right
exact ⟨_, ha, _, ih, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨[], nil_mem_kstar _, _, ⟨hx, nil_append _⟩⟩
· rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, iSup_mul, iSup_le_iff]
intro i
induction' i with _ ih <;> rw [h]
· rw [pow_zero, one_mul, add_comm]
| exact le_self_add
· rw [add_comm, pow_add, pow_one, mul_assoc]
| Mathlib/Computability/Language.lean | 311 | 312 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCocycles A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCocycles A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCocycles A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f g⁻¹) = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_cancel g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles (x : A) :
dZero A x ∈ oneCocycles A :=
congr($(dOne_comp_dZero A) x)
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
| f (g * h) = f g + f h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 284 | 289 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# With Density
For an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` which is finite
everywhere, we define `withDensity κ f` as the kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. This is
an s-finite kernel.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.withDensity κ (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞)`:
kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. It is defined if `κ` is s-finite. If `f` is finite
everywhere, then this is also an s-finite kernel. The class of s-finite kernels is the smallest
class of kernels that contains finite kernels and which is stable by `withDensity`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.lintegral_withDensity`:
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
variable {κ : Kernel α β} {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Kernel with image `(κ a).withDensity (f a)` if `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, and
with image 0 otherwise. If `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, it satisfies
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f hf a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`. -/
noncomputable def withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
Kernel α β :=
@dite _ (Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (Classical.dec _) (fun hf =>
(⟨fun a => (κ a).withDensity (f a),
by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact hf.setLIntegral_kernel_prod_right hs⟩ : Kernel α β)) fun _ => 0
theorem withDensity_of_not_measurable (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : ¬Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) : withDensity κ f = 0 := by classical exact dif_neg hf
protected theorem withDensity_apply (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) :
withDensity κ f a = (κ a).withDensity (f a) := by
classical
rw [withDensity, dif_pos hf]
rfl
protected theorem withDensity_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
withDensity κ f a s = ∫⁻ b in s, f a b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply κ hf, withDensity_apply' _ s]
nonrec lemma withDensity_congr_ae (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
(hfg : ∀ a, f a =ᵐ[κ a] g a) :
withDensity κ f = withDensity κ g := by
ext a
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf,Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hg, withDensity_congr_ae (hfg a)]
nonrec lemma withDensity_absolutelyContinuous [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) (a : α) :
Kernel.withDensity κ f a ≪ κ a := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
| · rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
simp [Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.zero]
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_one (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ 1 = κ := by
ext; rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ measurable_const]; simp
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/WithDensity.lean | 81 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
- Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : α ⊕ (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {f : t.varFinset → β}
{v : β → M} (v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(t.restrictVar f).realize v = t.realize v' := by
induction t with
| var => simp [restrictVar, hv']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i ((by simp [Function.comp_apply, hv'])))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar' [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v :=
realize_restrictVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)}
{f : t.varFinsetLeft → β}
{xs : β ⊕ γ → M} (xs' : α → M) (hxs' : ∀ a, xs (Sum.inl (f a)) = xs' a) :
(t.restrictVarLeft f).realize xs = t.realize (Sum.elim xs' (xs ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
induction t with
| var a => cases a <;> simp [restrictVarLeft, hxs']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (by simp [hxs']))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVarLeft`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft' [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
realize_restrictVarLeft _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => simp
| @func n f ts ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· obtain - | f := f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (α ⊕ β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction t with
| var ab => rcases ab with a | b <;> simp [Language.con]
| func f ts ih =>
simp only [realize, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, ih, varsToConstants]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem HomClass.realize_term {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N]
(g : F) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, HomClass.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, max, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
apply realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction φ with
| falsum => simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
| @all k _ ih3 =>
have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
split_ifs <;> dsimp; omega
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
{f : φ.freeVarFinset → β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(φ.restrictFreeVar f).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v' xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_2]
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv']), realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| rel =>
simp only [Realize, freeVarFinset.eq_3, Finset.biUnion_val, restrictFreeVar]
congr!
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_4]
rw [ih1, ih2] <;> simp [hv']
| all _ ih3 =>
simp only [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
refine forall_congr' (fun _ => ?_)
rw [ih3]; simp [hv']
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictFreeVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar' [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs :=
realize_restrictFreeVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [← (lhomWithConstants L α).map_onRelation
(Equiv.sumEmpty (L.Relations n) ((constantsOn α).Relations n) R) xs]
rcongr
obtain - | R := R
· simp
· exact isEmptyElim R
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabelEquiv {g : α ≃ β} {k} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α k} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin k → M} : (relabelEquiv g φ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) xs := by
simp only [relabelEquiv, mapTermRelEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl]
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => ?_) fun _ _ _ => rfl
simp only [relabelEquiv_apply, Term.realize_relabel]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext (i | i) <;> rfl
variable [Nonempty M]
theorem realize_all_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).all.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
inhabit M
simp only [realize_all, realize_liftAt_one_self]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a => ?_⟩
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp (h default)
simp
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp h
simp
end BoundedFormula
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_onBoundedFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] {n : ℕ}
(ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.onBoundedFormula ψ).Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs := by
induction ψ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_bdEqual, realize_onTerm]; rfl
| rel =>
simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_rel, LHom.map_onRelation,
Function.comp_apply, realize_onTerm]
rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih1, ih2, realize_imp]
| all _ ih3 => simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih3, realize_all]
end LHom
namespace Formula
/-- A formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
nonrec def Realize (φ : L.Formula α) (v : α → M) : Prop :=
φ.Realize v default
variable {φ ψ : L.Formula α} {v : α → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v ↔ ¬φ.Realize v :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ True :=
BoundedFormula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∧ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v → ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term α} :
(R.formula ts).Realize v ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_rel.trans (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₁ t).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∨ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v ↔ (φ.Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v) :=
BoundedFormula.realize_iff
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {φ : L.Formula α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) := by
rw [Realize, Realize, relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, iff_eq_eq, Fin.castAdd_zero]
exact congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)
theorem realize_relabel_sumInr (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) {v : Empty → M} {x : Fin n → M} :
(BoundedFormula.relabel Sum.inr φ).Realize v x ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, Sum.elim_comp_inr, Fin.castAdd_zero,
cast_refl, Function.comp_id,
Subsingleton.elim (x ∘ (natAdd n : Fin 0 → Fin n)) default]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias realize_relabel_sum_inr := realize_relabel_sumInr
@[simp]
theorem realize_equal {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {x : α → M} :
(t₁.equal t₂).Realize x ↔ t₁.realize x = t₂.realize x := by simp [Term.equal, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_graph {f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} {y : M} :
(Formula.graph f).Realize (Fin.cons y x : _ → M) ↔ funMap f x = y := by
simp only [Formula.graph, Term.realize, realize_equal, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
rw [eq_comm]
theorem boundedFormula_realize_eq_realize (φ : L.Formula α) (x : α → M) (y : Fin 0 → M) :
BoundedFormula.Realize φ x y ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext i; exact Fin.elim0 i
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (ψ : L.Formula α)
{v : α → M} : (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v :=
φ.realize_onBoundedFormula ψ
@[simp]
theorem LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Formula α) : (setOf (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize : Set (α → M)) = setOf ψ.Realize := by
ext
simp
variable (M)
/-- A sentence can be evaluated as true or false in a structure. -/
nonrec def Sentence.Realize (φ : L.Sentence) : Prop :=
φ.Realize (default : _ → M)
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Sentence.Realize]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Sentence.Realize
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_not {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ φ.not ↔ ¬M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
namespace Formula
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm_con [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M] (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) :
((equivSentence.symm φ).Realize fun a => (L.con a : M)) ↔ φ.Realize M := by
simp only [equivSentence, _root_.Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.coe_trans, Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv, Function.comp]
refine _root_.trans ?_ BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
rw [iff_iff_eq]
congr with (_ | a)
· simp
· cases a
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence [L[[α]].Structure M] [(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M]
(φ : L.Formula α) : (equivSentence φ).Realize M ↔ φ.Realize fun a => (L.con a : M) := by
rw [← realize_equivSentence_symm_con M (equivSentence φ), _root_.Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) (v : α → M) :
(equivSentence.symm φ).Realize v ↔
@Sentence.Realize _ M (@Language.withConstantsStructure L M _ α (constantsOn.structure v))
φ :=
letI := constantsOn.structure v
realize_equivSentence_symm_con M φ
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onSentence [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ.onSentence ψ ↔ M ⊨ ψ :=
φ.realize_onFormula ψ
variable (L)
/-- The complete theory of a structure `M` is the set of all sentences `M` satisfies. -/
def completeTheory : L.Theory :=
{ φ | M ⊨ φ }
variable (N)
/-- Two structures are elementarily equivalent when they satisfy the same sentences. -/
def ElementarilyEquivalent : Prop :=
L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent]
scoped[FirstOrder]
notation:25 A " ≅[" L "] " B:50 => FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
@[simp]
theorem mem_completeTheory {φ : Sentence L} : φ ∈ L.completeTheory M ↔ M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem elementarilyEquivalent_iff : M ≅[L] N ↔ ∀ φ : L.Sentence, M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
simp only [ElementarilyEquivalent, Set.ext_iff, completeTheory, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
variable (M)
/-- A model of a theory is a structure in which every sentence is realized as true. -/
class Theory.Model (T : L.Theory) : Prop where
realize_of_mem : ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Theory.Model]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Theory.Model
variable {M} (T : L.Theory)
@[simp default - 10]
theorem Theory.model_iff : M ⊨ T ↔ ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ :=
⟨fun h => h.realize_of_mem, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem [M ⊨ T] {φ : L.Sentence} (h : φ ∈ T) : M ⊨ φ :=
Theory.Model.realize_of_mem φ h
@[simp]
theorem LHom.onTheory_model [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (T : L.Theory) :
M ⊨ φ.onTheory T ↔ M ⊨ T := by simp [Theory.model_iff, LHom.onTheory]
variable {T}
instance model_empty : M ⊨ (∅ : L.Theory) :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (Set.not_mem_empty φ hφ).elim⟩
namespace Theory
theorem Model.mono {T' : L.Theory} (_h : M ⊨ T') (hs : T ⊆ T') : M ⊨ T :=
⟨fun _φ hφ => T'.realize_sentence_of_mem (hs hφ)⟩
theorem Model.union {T' : L.Theory} (h : M ⊨ T) (h' : M ⊨ T') : M ⊨ T ∪ T' := by
simp only [model_iff, Set.mem_union] at *
exact fun φ hφ => hφ.elim (h _) (h' _)
@[simp]
theorem model_union_iff {T' : L.Theory} : M ⊨ T ∪ T' ↔ M ⊨ T ∧ M ⊨ T' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono Set.subset_union_left, h.mono Set.subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem model_singleton_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ ({φ} : L.Theory) ↔ M ⊨ φ := by simp
theorem model_insert_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ insert φ T ↔ M ⊨ φ ∧ M ⊨ T := by
rw [Set.insert_eq, model_union_iff, model_singleton_iff]
theorem model_iff_subset_completeTheory : M ⊨ T ↔ T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
T.model_iff
theorem completeTheory.subset [MT : M ⊨ T] : T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
model_iff_subset_completeTheory.1 MT
end Theory
instance model_completeTheory : M ⊨ L.completeTheory M :=
Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory.2 (subset_refl _)
variable (M N)
theorem realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory [N ⊨ L.completeTheory M] (φ : L.Sentence) :
N ⊨ φ ↔ M ⊨ φ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← Sentence.realize_not] at *
exact (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem (mem_completeTheory.2 h)
variable {M N}
namespace BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_alls {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.alls.Realize v ↔ ∀ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.forall_iff.symm
· simp only [alls, ih, Realize]
exact ⟨fun h xs => Fin.snoc_init_self xs ▸ h _ _, fun h xs x => h (Fin.snoc xs x)⟩
@[simp]
theorem realize_exs {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.exs.Realize v ↔ ∃ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.exists_iff.symm
· simp only [BoundedFormula.exs, ih, realize_ex]
constructor
· rintro ⟨xs, x, h⟩
exact ⟨_, h⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
rw [← Fin.snoc_init_self xs] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iAlls
[Finite β] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ β)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iAlls β).Realize v ↔
∀ (i : β → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i a) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin β))
rw [Formula.iAlls]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_alls, realize_relabel, Function.comp_def,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iAlls [Finite β] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ β)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iAlls β) v v' ↔
∀ (i : β → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i a) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iAlls, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExs
[Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iExs γ).Realize v ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iExs]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_exs, realize_relabel, Function.comp_def,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.exists_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iExs [Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExs γ) v v' ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iExs, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem realize_toFormula (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (v : α ⊕ (Fin n) → M) :
φ.toFormula.Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ Sum.inl) (v ∘ Sum.inr) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
| rel => simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_imp, ← Formula.Realize, ih1, ← Formula.Realize, ih2,
realize_imp]
| all _ ih3 =>
rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_all, realize_all]
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_
have h := ih3 (Sum.elim (v ∘ Sum.inl) (snoc (v ∘ Sum.inr) a))
simp only [Sum.elim_comp_inl, Sum.elim_comp_inr] at h
rw [← h, realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
simp only [Function.comp_def]
congr with x
· rcases x with _ | x
· simp
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ x
· rw [Sum.elim_inr, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_last, Sum.map_inr, Sum.elim_inr]
simp [Fin.snoc]
· simp only [castSucc, Function.comp_apply, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_apply_castAdd, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
rw [← castSucc]
simp
· exact Fin.elim0 x
@[simp]
theorem realize_iSup [Finite β] {f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n}
{v : α → M} {v' : Fin n → M} :
(iSup f).Realize v v' ↔ ∃ b, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iSup, realize_foldr_sup, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList, Finset.mem_univ, true_and,
exists_exists_eq_and]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iInf [Finite β] {f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n}
{v : α → M} {v' : Fin n → M} :
(iInf f).Realize v v' ↔ ∀ b, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iInf, realize_foldr_inf, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList, Finset.mem_univ, true_and,
forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExsUnique [Finite γ]
{φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iExsUnique γ).Realize v ↔
∃! (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [Formula.iExsUnique, ExistsUnique]
simp only [Formula.realize_iExs, Formula.realize_inf, Formula.realize_iAlls, Formula.realize_imp,
Formula.realize_relabel]
simp only [Formula.Realize, Function.comp_def, Term.equal, Term.relabel, realize_iInf,
realize_bdEqual, Term.realize_var, Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, funext_iff]
refine exists_congr (fun i => and_congr_right' (forall_congr' (fun y => ?_)))
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x
cases x <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem realize_iExsUnique [Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExsUnique γ) v v' ↔
∃! (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iExsUnique, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end BoundedFormula
namespace StrongHomClass
variable {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [StrongHomClass L F M N] (g : F)
@[simp]
theorem realize_boundedFormula (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : φ.Realize (g ∘ v) (g ∘ xs) ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, HomClass.realize_term,
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq g]
| rel =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, HomClass.realize_term]
exact StrongHomClass.map_rel g _ _
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, ih1, ih2, BoundedFormula.Realize]
| all _ ih3 =>
rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, BoundedFormula.Realize]
constructor
· intro h a
have h' := h (g a)
rw [← Fin.comp_snoc, ih3] at h'
exact h'
· intro h a
have h' := h (EquivLike.inv g a)
rw [← ih3, Fin.comp_snoc, EquivLike.apply_inv_apply g] at h'
exact h'
@[simp]
theorem realize_formula (φ : L.Formula α) {v : α → M} :
φ.Realize (g ∘ v) ↔ φ.Realize v := by
rw [Formula.Realize, Formula.Realize, ← realize_boundedFormula g φ, iff_eq_eq,
Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
include g
theorem realize_sentence (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
rw [Sentence.Realize, Sentence.Realize, ← realize_formula g,
Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
theorem theory_model [M ⊨ T] : N ⊨ T :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (realize_sentence g φ).1 (Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem T hφ)⟩
theorem elementarilyEquivalent : M ≅[L] N :=
elementarilyEquivalent_iff.2 (realize_sentence g)
end StrongHomClass
namespace Relations
open BoundedFormula
variable {r : L.Relations 2}
@[simp]
theorem realize_reflexive : M ⊨ r.reflexive ↔ Reflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_irreflexive : M ⊨ r.irreflexive ↔ Irreflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_congr realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_symmetric : M ⊨ r.symmetric ↔ Symmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_antisymmetric :
M ⊨ r.antisymmetric ↔ AntiSymmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ Iff.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem realize_transitive : M ⊨ r.transitive ↔ Transitive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
@[simp]
theorem realize_total : M ⊨ r.total ↔ Total fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_sup.trans (or_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
end Relations
section Cardinality
variable (L)
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_cardGe (n) : M ⊨ Sentence.cardGe L n ↔ ↑n ≤ #M := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_le.{0}, lift_lift, lift_mk_le, Sentence.cardGe, Sentence.Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_exs]
simp_rw [BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, List.mem_map, Prod.exists, Ne, List.mem_product,
List.mem_finRange, forall_exists_index, and_imp, List.mem_filter, true_and]
refine ⟨?_, fun xs => ⟨xs.some, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨xs, fun i j ij => ?_⟩⟩
contrapose! ij
have hij := h _ i j (by simpa using ij) rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.realize_not, Term.realize, BoundedFormula.realize_bdEqual,
Sum.elim_inr] at hij
exact hij
· rintro _ i j ij rfl
simpa using ij
@[simp]
theorem model_infiniteTheory_iff : M ⊨ L.infiniteTheory ↔ Infinite M := by
simp [infiniteTheory, infinite_iff, aleph0_le]
instance model_infiniteTheory [h : Infinite M] : M ⊨ L.infiniteTheory :=
L.model_infiniteTheory_iff.2 h
@[simp]
theorem model_nonemptyTheory_iff : M ⊨ L.nonemptyTheory ↔ Nonempty M := by
simp only [nonemptyTheory, Theory.model_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq,
Sentence.realize_cardGe, Nat.cast_one, one_le_iff_ne_zero, mk_ne_zero_iff]
instance model_nonempty [h : Nonempty M] : M ⊨ L.nonemptyTheory :=
L.model_nonemptyTheory_iff.2 h
theorem model_distinctConstantsTheory {M : Type w} [L[[α]].Structure M] (s : Set α) :
M ⊨ L.distinctConstantsTheory s ↔ Set.InjOn (fun i : α => (L.con i : M)) s := by
simp only [distinctConstantsTheory, Theory.model_iff, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_inter,
Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_compl, Prod.exists, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
refine ⟨fun h a as b bs ab => ?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose! ab
have h' := h _ a b ⟨⟨as, bs⟩, ab⟩ rfl
simp only [Sentence.Realize, Formula.realize_not, Formula.realize_equal,
Term.realize_constants] at h'
exact h'
· rintro h φ a b ⟨⟨as, bs⟩, ab⟩ rfl
simp only [Sentence.Realize, Formula.realize_not, Formula.realize_equal, Term.realize_constants]
exact fun contra => ab (h as bs contra)
theorem card_le_of_model_distinctConstantsTheory (s : Set α) (M : Type w) [L[[α]].Structure M]
[h : M ⊨ L.distinctConstantsTheory s] : Cardinal.lift.{w} #s ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u'} #M :=
| lift_mk_le'.2 ⟨⟨_, Set.injOn_iff_injective.1 ((L.model_distinctConstantsTheory s).1 h)⟩⟩
end Cardinality
namespace ElementarilyEquivalent
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (h : M ≅[L] N) : N ≅[L] M :=
h.symm
@[trans]
nonrec theorem trans (MN : M ≅[L] N) (NP : N ≅[L] P) : M ≅[L] P :=
MN.trans NP
theorem completeTheory_eq (h : M ≅[L] N) : L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N :=
h
theorem realize_sentence (h : M ≅[L] N) (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ :=
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 1,011 | 1,028 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Natural operations on ordinals
The goal of this file is to define natural addition and multiplication on ordinals, also known as
the Hessenberg sum and product, and provide a basic API. The natural addition of two ordinals
`a ♯ b` is recursively defined as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for `a' < a`
and `b' < b`. The natural multiplication `a ⨳ b` is likewise recursively defined as the least
ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for any `a' < a` and
`b' < b`.
These operations form a rich algebraic structure: they're commutative, associative, preserve order,
have the usual `0` and `1` from ordinals, and distribute over one another.
Moreover, these operations are the addition and multiplication of ordinals when viewed as
combinatorial `Game`s. This makes them particularly useful for game theory.
Finally, both operations admit simple, intuitive descriptions in terms of the Cantor normal form.
The natural addition of two ordinals corresponds to adding their Cantor normal forms as if they were
polynomials in `ω`. Likewise, their natural multiplication corresponds to multiplying the Cantor
normal forms as polynomials.
## Implementation notes
Given the rich algebraic structure of these two operations, we choose to create a type synonym
`NatOrdinal`, where we provide the appropriate instances. However, to avoid casting back and forth
between both types, we attempt to prove and state most results on `Ordinal`.
## Todo
- Prove the characterizations of natural addition and multiplication in terms of the Cantor normal
form.
-/
universe u v
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
/-! ### Basic casts between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal` -/
/-- A type synonym for ordinals with natural addition and multiplication. -/
def NatOrdinal : Type _ :=
Ordinal deriving Zero, Inhabited, One, WellFoundedRelation
-- The `LinearOrder, `SuccOrder` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance NatOrdinal.instLinearOrder : LinearOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instLinearOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instSuccOrder : SuccOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instSuccOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instOrderBot : OrderBot NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instOrderBot
instance NatOrdinal.instNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instNoMaxOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instZeroLEOneClass
instance NatOrdinal.instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : NatOrdinal) := Ordinal.instNeZeroOne
instance NatOrdinal.uncountable : Uncountable NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.uncountable
/-- The identity function between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def Ordinal.toNatOrdinal : Ordinal ≃o NatOrdinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
/-- The identity function between `NatOrdinal` and `Ordinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def NatOrdinal.toOrdinal : NatOrdinal ≃o Ordinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_symm_eq : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal.symm = Ordinal.toNatOrdinal :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal (a : NatOrdinal) : a.toOrdinal.toNatOrdinal = a :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.wellFoundedLT
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot NatOrdinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp] theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : NatOrdinal) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_zero : toOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_one : toOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_zero {a} : toOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_one {a} : toOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_max (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (max a b) = max (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_min (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (min a b) = min (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
theorem succ_def (a : NatOrdinal) : succ a = toNatOrdinal (toOrdinal a + 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_le (o : NatOrdinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
Ordinal.zero_le o
theorem not_lt_zero (o : NatOrdinal) : ¬ o < 0 :=
Ordinal.not_lt_zero o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {o : NatOrdinal} : o < 1 ↔ o = 0 :=
Ordinal.lt_one_iff_zero
/-- A recursor for `NatOrdinal`. Use as `induction x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected def rec {β : NatOrdinal → Sort*} (h : ∀ a, β (toNatOrdinal a)) : ∀ a, β a := fun a =>
h (toOrdinal a)
/-- `Ordinal.induction` but for `NatOrdinal`. -/
theorem induction {p : NatOrdinal → Prop} : ∀ (i) (_ : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j), p i :=
Ordinal.induction
instance small_Iio (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) := Ordinal.small_Iio a
instance small_Iic (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := Ordinal.small_Iic a
instance small_Ico (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ico a b) := Ordinal.small_Ico a b
instance small_Icc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Icc a b) := Ordinal.small_Icc a b
instance small_Ioo (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioo a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioo a b
instance small_Ioc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioc a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioc a b
end NatOrdinal
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c : Ordinal.{u}}
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_symm_eq : toNatOrdinal.symm = NatOrdinal.toOrdinal := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal (a : Ordinal) : a.toNatOrdinal.toOrdinal = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_zero : toNatOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_one : toNatOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_max (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (max a b) = max (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_min (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (min a b) = min (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
/-! We place the definitions of `nadd` and `nmul` before actually developing their API, as this
guarantees we only need to open the `NaturalOps` locale once. -/
/-- Natural addition on ordinals `a ♯ b`, also known as the Hessenberg sum, is recursively defined
as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for all `a' < a` and `b' < b`. In contrast
to normal ordinal addition, it is commutative.
Natural addition can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from adding up
corresponding coefficients in the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b`. -/
noncomputable def nadd (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
max (⨆ x : Iio a, succ (nadd x.1 b)) (⨆ x : Iio b, succ (nadd a x.1))
termination_by (a, b)
decreasing_by all_goals cases x; decreasing_tactic
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:65 " ♯ " => Ordinal.nadd
open NaturalOps
/-- Natural multiplication on ordinals `a ⨳ b`, also known as the Hessenberg product, is recursively
defined as the least ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for all
`a' < a` and `b < b'`. In contrast to normal ordinal multiplication, it is commutative and
distributive (over natural addition).
Natural multiplication can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from multiplying
the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b` as if they were polynomials in `ω`. Addition of exponents is
done via natural addition. -/
noncomputable def nmul (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, nmul a' b ♯ nmul a b' < c ♯ nmul a' b'}
termination_by (a, b)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:70 " ⨳ " => Ordinal.nmul
/-! ### Natural addition -/
theorem lt_nadd_iff : a < b ♯ c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' ♯ c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b ♯ c' := by
rw [nadd]
simp [Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff]
theorem nadd_le_iff : b ♯ c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' ♯ c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b ♯ c' < a := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_nadd_iff]
simp
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_left (h : b < c) (a) : a ♯ b < a ♯ c :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_right (h : b < c) (a) : b ♯ a < c ♯ a :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_le_nadd_left (h : b ≤ c) (a) : a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_left h a).le
· exact le_rfl
theorem nadd_le_nadd_right (h : b ≤ c) (a) : b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_right h a).le
· exact le_rfl
variable (a b)
theorem nadd_comm (a b) : a ♯ b = b ♯ a := by
rw [nadd, nadd, max_comm]
congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_comm _ _)
termination_by (a, b)
@[deprecated "blsub will soon be deprecated" (since := "2024-11-18")]
theorem blsub_nadd_of_mono {f : ∀ c < a ♯ b, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) :
blsub.{u,v} _ f =
max (blsub.{u, v} a fun a' ha' => f (a' ♯ b) <| nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b)
(blsub.{u, v} b fun b' hb' => f (a ♯ b') <| nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) := by
apply (blsub_le_iff.2 fun i h => _).antisymm (max_le _ _)
· intro i h
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 h with (⟨a', ha', hi⟩ | ⟨b', hb', hi⟩)
· exact lt_max_of_lt_left ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ ha'))
· exact lt_max_of_lt_right ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ hb'))
all_goals
apply blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, u, v}
rintro c ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
private theorem iSup_nadd_of_monotone {a b} (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (h : Monotone f) :
⨆ x : Iio (a ♯ b), f x = max (⨆ a' : Iio a, f (a'.1 ♯ b)) (⨆ b' : Iio b, f (a ♯ b'.1)) := by
apply (max_le _ _).antisymm'
· rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ | ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ := lt_nadd_iff.1 hi
· exact le_max_of_le_left ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio a ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
· exact le_max_of_le_right ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio b ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
all_goals
apply csSup_le_csSup' (bddAbove_of_small _)
rintro _ ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, rfl⟩
refine mem_range_self (⟨_, ?_⟩ : Iio _)
apply_rules [nadd_lt_nadd_left, nadd_lt_nadd_right]
theorem nadd_assoc (a b c) : a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ (b ♯ c) := by
| unfold nadd
rw [iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun a' ↦ succ (a' ♯ c), iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun b' ↦ succ (a ♯ b'),
max_assoc]
· congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_assoc _ _ _)
· exact succ_mono.comp fun x y h ↦ nadd_le_nadd_left h _
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/NaturalOps.lean | 267 | 271 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.List.EditDistance.Defs
/-!
# Lower bounds for Levenshtein distances
We show that there is some suffix `L'` of `L` such
that the Levenshtein distance from `L'` to `M` gives a lower bound
for the Levenshtein distance from `L` to `m :: M`.
This allows us to use the intermediate steps of a Levenshtein distance calculation
to produce lower bounds on the final result.
-/
variable {α β δ : Type*} {C : Levenshtein.Cost α β δ}
[AddCommMonoid δ] [LinearOrder δ] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd δ]
theorem suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_cons (xs : List α) (y ys) :
| (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.minimum ≤ levenshtein C xs (y :: ys) := by
induction xs with
| nil =>
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_nil', levenshtein_nil_cons,
List.minimum_singleton, WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (by simp)
| cons x xs ih =>
suffices
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.delete x + levenshtein C xs (y :: ys)) ∧
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.insert y + levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys) ∧
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.substitute x y + levenshtein C xs ys) by
simpa [suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· calc
_ ≤ (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.minimum := by
simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ ↑(levenshtein C xs (y :: ys)) := ih
_ ≤ _ := by simp
· calc
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys) := by
simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ _ := by simp
· calc
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (levenshtein C xs ys) := by
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
apply min_le_of_right_le
cases xs
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_nil']
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ _ := by simp
| Mathlib/Data/List/EditDistance/Bounds.lean | 26 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
| {a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 888 | 889 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Set
/-!
# Ends
This file contains a definition of the ends of a simple graph, as sections of the inverse system
assigning, to each finite set of vertices, the connected components of its complement.
-/
universe u
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) (K L M : Set V)
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- The components outside a given set of vertices `K` -/
abbrev ComponentCompl :=
(G.induce Kᶜ).ConnectedComponent
variable {G} {K L M}
/-- The connected component of `v` in `G.induce Kᶜ`. -/
abbrev componentComplMk (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
connectedComponentMk (G.induce Kᶜ) ⟨v, vK⟩
/-- The set of vertices of `G` making up the connected component `C` -/
def ComponentCompl.supp (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Set V :=
{ v : V | ∃ h : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk h = C }
@[ext]
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_injective :
Function.Injective (ComponentCompl.supp : G.ComponentCompl K → Set V) := by
refine ConnectedComponent.ind₂ ?_
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ h
simp only [Set.ext_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ComponentCompl.supp] at h ⊢
exact ((h v).mp ⟨hv, Reachable.refl _⟩).choose_spec
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : C.supp = D.supp ↔ C = D :=
ComponentCompl.supp_injective.eq_iff
instance ComponentCompl.setLike : SetLike (G.ComponentCompl K) V where
coe := ComponentCompl.supp
coe_injective' _ _ := ComponentCompl.supp_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem ComponentCompl.mem_supp_iff {v : V} {C : ComponentCompl G K} :
v ∈ C ↔ ∃ vK : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk vK = C :=
Iff.rfl
theorem componentComplMk_mem (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : v ∈ G.componentComplMk vK :=
⟨vK, rfl⟩
theorem componentComplMk_eq_of_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (wK : w ∉ K)
(a : G.Adj v w) : G.componentComplMk vK = G.componentComplMk wK := by
rw [ConnectedComponent.eq]
apply Adj.reachable
exact a
/-- In an infinite graph, the set of components out of a finite set is nonempty. -/
instance componentCompl_nonempty_of_infinite (G : SimpleGraph V) [Infinite V] (K : Finset V) :
Nonempty (G.ComponentCompl K) :=
let ⟨_, kK⟩ := K.finite_toSet.infinite_compl.nonempty
⟨componentComplMk _ kK⟩
namespace ComponentCompl
/-- A `ComponentCompl` specialization of `Quot.lift`, where soundness has to be proved only
for adjacent vertices.
-/
protected def lift {β : Sort*} (f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (_ : v ∉ K), β)
(h : ∀ ⦃v w⦄ (hv : v ∉ K) (hw : w ∉ K), G.Adj v w → f hv = f hw) : G.ComponentCompl K → β :=
ConnectedComponent.lift (fun vv => f vv.prop) fun v w p => by
induction p with
| nil => rintro _; rfl
| cons a q ih => rename_i u v w; rintro h'; exact (h u.prop v.prop a).trans (ih h'.of_cons)
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind {β : G.ComponentCompl K → Prop}
(f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (hv : v ∉ K), β (G.componentComplMk hv)) : ∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, β C := by
apply ConnectedComponent.ind
exact fun ⟨v, vnK⟩ => f vnK
/-- The induced graph on the vertices `C`. -/
protected abbrev coeGraph (C : ComponentCompl G K) : SimpleGraph C :=
G.induce (C : Set V)
theorem coe_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : (C : Set V) = (D : Set V) ↔ C = D :=
SetLike.coe_set_eq
@[simp]
protected theorem nonempty (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : (C : Set V).Nonempty :=
C.ind fun v vnK => ⟨v, vnK, rfl⟩
protected theorem exists_eq_mk (C : G.ComponentCompl K) :
∃ (v : _) (h : v ∉ K), G.componentComplMk h = C :=
C.nonempty
protected theorem disjoint_right (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Disjoint K C := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun v ⟨vK, vC⟩ => vC.choose vK
theorem not_mem_of_mem {C : G.ComponentCompl K} {c : V} (cC : c ∈ C) : c ∉ K := fun cK =>
Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right ⟨cK, cC⟩
protected theorem pairwise_disjoint :
Pairwise fun C D : G.ComponentCompl K => Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rintro C D ne
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun u ⟨uC, uD⟩ => ne (uC.choose_spec.symm.trans uD.choose_spec)
/-- Any vertex adjacent to a vertex of `C` and not lying in `K` must lie in `C`.
-/
theorem mem_of_adj : ∀ {C : G.ComponentCompl K} (c d : V), c ∈ C → d ∉ K → G.Adj c d → d ∈ C :=
fun {C} c d ⟨cnK, h⟩ dnK cd =>
⟨dnK, by
rw [← h, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact Adj.reachable cd.symm⟩
/--
Assuming `G` is preconnected and `K` not empty, given any connected component `C` outside of `K`,
there exists a vertex `k ∈ K` adjacent to a vertex `v ∈ C`.
-/
theorem exists_adj_boundary_pair (Gc : G.Preconnected) (hK : K.Nonempty) :
∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, ∃ ck : V × V, ck.1 ∈ C ∧ ck.2 ∈ K ∧ G.Adj ck.1 ck.2 := by
refine ComponentCompl.ind fun v vnK => ?_
let C : G.ComponentCompl K := G.componentComplMk vnK
let dis := Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right
by_contra! h
suffices Set.univ = (C : Set V) by exact dis ⟨hK.choose_spec, this ▸ Set.mem_univ hK.some⟩
symm
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rintro u
by_contra unC
obtain ⟨p⟩ := Gc v u
obtain ⟨⟨⟨x, y⟩, xy⟩, -, xC, ynC⟩ :=
p.exists_boundary_dart (C : Set V) (G.componentComplMk_mem vnK) unC
exact ynC (mem_of_adj x y xC (fun yK : y ∈ K => h ⟨x, y⟩ xC yK xy) xy)
/--
If `K ⊆ L`, the components outside of `L` are all contained in a single component outside of `K`.
-/
abbrev hom (h : K ⊆ L) (C : G.ComponentCompl L) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
C.map <| induceHom Hom.id <| Set.compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_hom (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) : (C : Set V) ⊆ (C.hom h : Set V) := by
| rintro c ⟨cL, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun h' => cL (h h'), rfl⟩
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.componentComplMk_mem_hom
(G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (h : L ⊆ K) :
v ∈ (G.componentComplMk vK).hom h :=
subset_hom (G.componentComplMk vK) h (G.componentComplMk_mem vK)
theorem hom_eq_iff_le (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ (C : Set V) ⊆ (D : Set V) :=
⟨fun h' => h' ▸ C.subset_hom h, C.ind fun _ vnL vD => (vD ⟨vnL, rfl⟩).choose_spec⟩
theorem hom_eq_iff_not_disjoint (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ ¬Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Ends/Defs.lean | 154 | 168 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Finset
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
/-!
# Stabilizer of a set under a pointwise action
This file characterises the stabilizer of a set/finset under the pointwise action of a group.
-/
open Function MulOpposite Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
variable {G H α : Type*}
/-! ### Stabilizer of a set -/
section Set
section Group
variable [Group G] [Group H] [MulAction G α] {a : G} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_empty : stabilizer G (∅ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
Subgroup.coe_eq_univ.1 <| eq_univ_of_forall fun _a ↦ smul_set_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_univ : stabilizer G (Set.univ : Set α) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_singleton (b : α) : stabilizer G ({b} : Set α) = stabilizer G b := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_stabilizer_set {s : Set α} : a ∈ stabilizer G s ↔ ∀ b, a • b ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s := by
refine mem_stabilizer_iff.trans ⟨fun h b ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← (smul_mem_smul_set_iff : a • b ∈ _ ↔ _), h]
| simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
exact ((MulAction.toPerm a).forall_congr' <| by simp [Iff.comm]).1 h
@[to_additive]
lemma map_stabilizer_le (f : G →* H) (s : Set G) :
(stabilizer G s).map f ≤ stabilizer H (f '' s) := by
rintro a
| Mathlib/Algebra/Pointwise/Stabilizer.lean | 44 | 50 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
| (gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 228 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
|
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 348 | 350 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Finite partitions
In this file, we define finite partitions. A finpartition of `a : α` is a finite set of pairwise
disjoint parts `parts : Finset α` which does not contain `⊥` and whose supremum is `a`.
Finpartitions of a finset are at the heart of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. They are also studied
purely order theoretically in Sperner theory.
## Constructions
We provide many ways to build finpartitions:
* `Finpartition.ofErase`: Builds a finpartition by erasing `⊥` for you.
* `Finpartition.ofSubset`: Builds a finpartition from a subset of the parts of a previous
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.empty`: The empty finpartition of `⊥`.
* `Finpartition.indiscrete`: The indiscrete, aka trivial, aka pure, finpartition made of a single
part.
* `Finpartition.discrete`: The discrete finpartition of `s : Finset α` made of singletons.
* `Finpartition.bind`: Puts together the finpartitions of the parts of a finpartition into a new
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.ofExistsUnique`: Builds a finpartition from a collection of parts such that each
element is in exactly one part.
* `Finpartition.ofSetoid`: With `Fintype α`, constructs the finpartition of `univ : Finset α`
induced by the equivalence classes of `s : Setoid α`.
* `Finpartition.atomise`: Makes a finpartition of `s : Finset α` by breaking `s` along all finsets
in `F : Finset (Finset α)`. Two elements of `s` belong to the same part iff they belong to the
same elements of `F`.
`Finpartition.indiscrete` and `Finpartition.bind` together form the monadic structure of
`Finpartition`.
## Implementation notes
Forbidding `⊥` as a part follows mathematical tradition and is a pragmatic choice concerning
operations on `Finpartition`. Not caring about `⊥` being a part or not breaks extensionality (it's
not because the parts of `P` and the parts of `Q` have the same elements that `P = Q`). Enforcing
`⊥` to be a part makes `Finpartition.bind` uglier and doesn't rid us of the need of
`Finpartition.ofErase`.
## TODO
The order is the wrong way around to make `Finpartition a` a graded order. Is it bad to depart from
the literature and turn the order around?
The specialisation to `Finset α` could be generalised to atomistic orders.
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A finite partition of `a : α` is a pairwise disjoint finite set of elements whose supremum is
`a`. We forbid `⊥` as a part. -/
@[ext]
structure Finpartition [Lattice α] [OrderBot α] (a : α) where
/-- The elements of the finite partition of `a` -/
parts : Finset α
/-- The partition is supremum-independent -/
protected supIndep : parts.SupIndep id
/-- The supremum of the partition is `a` -/
sup_parts : parts.sup id = a
/-- No element of the partition is bottom -/
not_bot_mem : ⊥ ∉ parts
deriving DecidableEq
namespace Finpartition
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor which does not insist on `⊥` not being a part. -/
@[simps]
def ofErase [DecidableEq α] {a : α} (parts : Finset α) (sup_indep : parts.SupIndep id)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = a) : Finpartition a where
parts := parts.erase ⊥
supIndep := sup_indep.subset (erase_subset _ _)
sup_parts := (sup_erase_bot _).trans sup_parts
not_bot_mem := not_mem_erase _ _
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor from a bigger existing finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubset {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) {parts : Finset α} (subset : parts ⊆ P.parts)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = b) : Finpartition b :=
{ parts := parts
supIndep := P.supIndep.subset subset
sup_parts := sup_parts
not_bot_mem := fun h ↦ P.not_bot_mem (subset h) }
/-- Changes the type of a finpartition to an equal one. -/
@[simps]
def copy {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) (h : a = b) : Finpartition b where
parts := P.parts
supIndep := P.supIndep
sup_parts := h ▸ P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem := P.not_bot_mem
/-- Transfer a finpartition over an order isomorphism. -/
def map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} (e : α ≃o β) (P : Finpartition a) :
Finpartition (e a) where
parts := P.parts.map e
supIndep u hu _ hb hbu _ hx hxu := by
rw [← map_symm_subset] at hu
simp only [mem_map_equiv] at hb
have := P.supIndep hu hb (by simp [hbu]) (map_rel e.symm hx) ?_
· rw [← e.symm.map_bot] at this
exact e.symm.map_rel_iff.mp this
· convert e.symm.map_rel_iff.mpr hxu
rw [map_finset_sup, sup_map]
rfl
sup_parts := by simp [← P.sup_parts]
not_bot_mem := by
rw [mem_map_equiv]
convert P.not_bot_mem
exact e.symm.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem parts_map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} {e : α ≃o β} {P : Finpartition a} :
(P.map e).parts = P.parts.map e := rfl
variable (α)
/-- The empty finpartition. -/
@[simps]
protected def empty : Finpartition (⊥ : α) where
parts := ∅
supIndep := supIndep_empty _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_empty
not_bot_mem := not_mem_empty ⊥
instance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
⟨Finpartition.empty α⟩
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_empty : (default : Finpartition (⊥ : α)) = Finpartition.empty α :=
rfl
variable {α} {a : α}
/-- The finpartition in one part, aka indiscrete finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def indiscrete (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : Finpartition a where
parts := {a}
supIndep := supIndep_singleton _ _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_singleton
not_bot_mem h := ha (mem_singleton.1 h).symm
variable (P : Finpartition a)
protected theorem le {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≤ a :=
(le_sup hb).trans P.sup_parts.le
theorem ne_bot {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≠ ⊥ := by
intro h
refine P.not_bot_mem (?_)
rw [h] at hb
exact hb
protected theorem disjoint : (P.parts : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint id :=
P.supIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
variable {P}
@[simp]
theorem parts_eq_empty_iff : P.parts = ∅ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun b hb ↦ P.not_bot_mem ?_⟩
· rw [h]
exact Finset.sup_empty
· rwa [← le_bot_iff.1 ((le_sup hb).trans h.le)]
@[simp]
theorem parts_nonempty_iff : P.parts.Nonempty ↔ a ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_iff_not, parts_eq_empty_iff]
theorem parts_nonempty (P : Finpartition a) (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : P.parts.Nonempty :=
parts_nonempty_iff.2 ha
instance : Unique (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
{ (inferInstance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α))) with
uniq := fun P ↦ by
ext a
exact iff_of_false (fun h ↦ P.ne_bot h <| le_bot_iff.1 <| P.le h) (not_mem_empty a) }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- There's a unique partition of an atom. -/
abbrev _root_.IsAtom.uniqueFinpartition (ha : IsAtom a) : Unique (Finpartition a) where
default := indiscrete ha.1
uniq P := by
have h : ∀ b ∈ P.parts, b = a := fun _ hb ↦
(ha.le_iff.mp <| P.le hb).resolve_left (P.ne_bot hb)
ext b
refine Iff.trans ⟨h b, ?_⟩ mem_singleton.symm
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := P.parts_nonempty ha.1
simp_rw [← h c hc]
exact hc
instance [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : Fintype (Finpartition a) :=
@Fintype.ofSurjective { p : Finset α // p.SupIndep id ∧ p.sup id = a ∧ ⊥ ∉ p } (Finpartition a) _
(Subtype.fintype _) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.1, i.2.1, i.2.2.1, i.2.2.2⟩) fun ⟨_, y, z, w⟩ ↦
⟨⟨_, y, z, w⟩, rfl⟩
/-! ### Refinement order -/
section Order
/-- We say that `P ≤ Q` if `P` refines `Q`: each part of `P` is less than some part of `Q`. -/
instance : LE (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ P.parts → ∃ c ∈ Q.parts, b ≤ c⟩
instance : PartialOrder (Finpartition a) :=
{ (inferInstance : LE (Finpartition a)) with
le_refl := fun _ b hb ↦ ⟨b, hb, le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ Q R hPQ hQR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQR hc
exact ⟨d, hd, hbc.trans hcd⟩
le_antisymm := fun P Q hPQ hQP ↦ by
ext b
refine ⟨fun hb ↦ ?_, fun hb ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQP hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [P.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (P.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)]
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hQP hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hPQ hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [Q.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (Q.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)] }
instance [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : OrderTop (Finpartition a) where
top := if ha : a = ⊥ then (Finpartition.empty α).copy ha.symm else indiscrete ha
le_top P := by
split_ifs with h
· intro x hx
simpa [h, P.ne_bot hx] using P.le hx
· exact fun b hb ↦ ⟨a, mem_singleton_self _, P.le hb⟩
theorem parts_top_subset (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : (⊤ : Finpartition a).parts ⊆ {a} := by
intro b hb
have hb : b ∈ Finpartition.parts (dite _ _ _) := hb
split_ifs at hb
· simp only [copy_parts, empty_parts, not_mem_empty] at hb
· exact hb
theorem parts_top_subsingleton (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] :
((⊤ : Finpartition a).parts : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton fun _ hb ↦ mem_singleton.1 <| parts_top_subset _ hb
-- TODO: this instance takes double-exponential time to generate all partitions, find a faster way
instance [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} : Fintype (Finpartition s) where
elems := s.powerset.powerset.image
fun ps ↦ if h : ps.sup id = s ∧ ⊥ ∉ ps ∧ ps.SupIndep id then ⟨ps, h.2.2, h.1, h.2.1⟩ else ⊤
complete P := by
refine mem_image.mpr ⟨P.parts, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_powerset]; intro p hp; rw [mem_powerset]; exact P.le hp
· simp [P.supIndep, P.sup_parts, P.not_bot_mem, -bot_eq_empty]
end Order
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α]
section Inf
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
instance : Min (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦
ofErase ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2)
(by
rw [supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase]
simp only [mem_image, and_imp, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, id, Prod.exists,
mem_product, Finset.disjoint_sup_right, mem_erase, Ne]
rintro _ x₁ y₁ hx₁ hy₁ rfl _ h x₂ y₂ hx₂ hy₂ rfl
rcases eq_or_ne x₁ x₂ with (rfl | xdiff)
· refine Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right (Q.disjoint hy₁ hy₂ ?_)
intro t
simp [t] at h
exact Disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left (P.disjoint hx₁ hx₂ xdiff))
(by
rw [sup_image, id_comp, sup_product_left]
trans P.parts.sup id ⊓ Q.parts.sup id
· simp_rw [Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left]
rfl
· rw [P.sup_parts, Q.sup_parts, inf_idem])⟩
@[simp]
theorem parts_inf (P Q : Finpartition a) :
(P ⊓ Q).parts = ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc : α × α ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2).erase ⊥ :=
rfl
instance : SemilatticeInf (Finpartition a) :=
{ inf := Min.min
inf_le_left := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.1, hc.1, inf_le_left⟩
inf_le_right := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.2, hc.2, inf_le_right⟩
le_inf := fun P Q R hPQ hPR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hbd⟩ := hPR hb
have h := _root_.le_inf hbc hbd
refine
⟨c ⊓ d,
mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (P.ne_bot hb) h)
(mem_image.2 ⟨(c, d), mem_product.2 ⟨hc, hd⟩, rfl⟩),
h⟩ }
end Inf
theorem exists_le_of_le {a b : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) (hb : b ∈ Q.parts) :
∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := by
by_contra H
refine Q.ne_bot hb (disjoint_self.1 <| Disjoint.mono_right (Q.le hb) ?_)
rw [← P.sup_parts, Finset.disjoint_sup_right]
rintro c hc
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := h hc
refine (Q.disjoint hb hd ?_).mono_right hcd
rintro rfl
simp only [not_exists, not_and] at H
exact H _ hc hcd
theorem card_mono {a : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) : #Q.parts ≤ #P.parts := by
classical
have : ∀ b ∈ Q.parts, ∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := fun b ↦ exists_le_of_le h
choose f hP hf using this
rw [← card_attach]
refine card_le_card_of_injOn (fun b ↦ f _ b.2) (fun b _ ↦ hP _ b.2) fun b _ c _ h ↦ ?_
exact
Subtype.coe_injective
(Q.disjoint.elim b.2 c.2 fun H ↦
P.ne_bot (hP _ b.2) <| disjoint_self.1 <| H.mono (hf _ b.2) <| h.le.trans <| hf _ c.2)
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
section Bind
variable {P : Finpartition a} {Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i}
/-- Given a finpartition `P` of `a` and finpartitions of each part of `P`, this yields the
finpartition of `a` obtained by juxtaposing all the subpartitions. -/
@[simps]
def bind (P : Finpartition a) (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) : Finpartition a where
parts := P.parts.attach.biUnion fun i ↦ (Q i.1 i.2).parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
rintro a ha b hb h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion] at ha hb
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB⟩, -, hb⟩ := hb
obtain rfl | hAB := eq_or_ne A B
· exact (Q A hA).disjoint ha hb h
· exact (P.disjoint hA hB hAB).mono ((Q A hA).le ha) ((Q B hB).le hb)
sup_parts := by
simp_rw [sup_biUnion]
trans (sup P.parts id)
· rw [eq_comm, ← Finset.sup_attach]
exact sup_congr rfl fun b _hb ↦ (Q b.1 b.2).sup_parts.symm
· exact P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem h := by
rw [Finset.mem_biUnion] at h
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩ := h
exact (Q A hA).not_bot_mem h
theorem mem_bind : b ∈ (P.bind Q).parts ↔ ∃ A hA, b ∈ (Q A hA).parts := by
rw [bind, mem_biUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩
exact ⟨A, hA, h⟩
· rintro ⟨A, hA, h⟩
exact ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, mem_attach _ ⟨A, hA⟩, h⟩
theorem card_bind (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) :
#(P.bind Q).parts = ∑ A ∈ P.parts.attach, #(Q _ A.2).parts := by
apply card_biUnion
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩ - ⟨c, hc⟩ - hbc
rw [Function.onFun, Finset.disjoint_left]
rintro d hdb hdc
rw [Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at hbc
exact
(Q b hb).ne_bot hdb
(eq_bot_iff.2 <|
(le_inf ((Q b hb).le hdb) <| (Q c hc).le hdc).trans <| (P.disjoint hb hc hbc).le_bot)
end Bind
/-- Adds `b` to a finpartition of `a` to make a finpartition of `a ⊔ b`. -/
@[simps]
def extend (P : Finpartition a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : Disjoint a b) (hc : a ⊔ b = c) :
Finpartition c where
parts := insert b P.parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint, coe_insert]
exact P.disjoint.insert fun d hd _ ↦ hab.symm.mono_right <| P.le hd
sup_parts := by rwa [sup_insert, P.sup_parts, id, _root_.sup_comm]
not_bot_mem h := (mem_insert.1 h).elim hb.symm P.not_bot_mem
theorem card_extend (P : Finpartition a) (b c : α) {hb : b ≠ ⊥} {hab : Disjoint a b}
{hc : a ⊔ b = c} : #(P.extend hb hab hc).parts = #P.parts + 1 :=
card_insert_of_not_mem fun h ↦ hb <| hab.symm.eq_bot_of_le <| P.le h
end DistribLattice
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α} (P : Finpartition a)
/-- Restricts a finpartition to avoid a given element. -/
@[simps!]
def avoid (b : α) : Finpartition (a \ b) :=
ofErase
(P.parts.image (· \ b))
(P.disjoint.image_finset_of_le fun _ ↦ sdiff_le).supIndep
(by rw [sup_image, id_comp, Finset.sup_sdiff_right, ← Function.id_def, P.sup_parts])
@[simp]
theorem mem_avoid : c ∈ (P.avoid b).parts ↔ ∃ d ∈ P.parts, ¬d ≤ b ∧ d \ b = c := by
simp only [avoid, ofErase, mem_erase, Ne, mem_image, exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
@and_left_comm (c ≠ ⊥)]
refine exists_congr fun d ↦ and_congr_right' <| and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
rw [sdiff_eq_bot_iff]
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
end Finpartition
/-! ### Finite partitions of finsets -/
namespace Finpartition
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s) {a : α}
lemma subset {a : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ P.parts) : a ⊆ s := P.le ha
theorem nonempty_of_mem_parts {a : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ P.parts) : a.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| P.ne_bot ha
@[simp]
theorem not_empty_mem_parts : ∅ ∉ P.parts := P.not_bot_mem
theorem ne_empty (h : t ∈ P.parts) : t ≠ ∅ := P.ne_bot h
lemma eq_of_mem_parts (ht : t ∈ P.parts) (hu : u ∈ P.parts) (hat : a ∈ t) (hau : a ∈ u) : t = u :=
P.disjoint.elim ht hu <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨a, hat, hau⟩
theorem exists_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃ t ∈ P.parts, a ∈ t := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts] at ha
exact mem_sup.1 ha
theorem biUnion_parts : P.parts.biUnion id = s :=
(sup_eq_biUnion _ _).symm.trans P.sup_parts
theorem existsUnique_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃! t, t ∈ P.parts ∧ a ∈ t := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := P.exists_mem ha
refine ⟨t, ⟨ht, ht'⟩, ?_⟩
rintro u ⟨hu, hu'⟩
exact P.eq_of_mem_parts hu ht hu' ht'
/--
Construct a `Finpartition s` from a finset of finsets `parts` such that each element of `s` is in
exactly one member of `parts`. This provides a converse to `Finpartition.subset`,
`Finpartition.not_empty_mem_parts` and `Finpartition.existsUnique_mem`.
-/
@[simps]
def ofExistsUnique (parts : Finset (Finset α)) (h : ∀ p ∈ parts, p ⊆ s)
(h' : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃! t ∈ parts, a ∈ t) (h'' : ∅ ∉ parts) :
Finpartition s where
parts := parts
supIndep := by
simp only [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [Function.onFun, Finset.disjoint_left]
intro x hx hx'
exact hab ((h' x (h _ ha hx)).unique ⟨ha, hx⟩ ⟨hb, hx'⟩)
sup_parts := by
ext i
simp only [mem_sup, id_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩
exact h j hj hj'
· rintro hi
exact (h' i hi).exists
not_bot_mem := h''
/-- The part of the finpartition that `a` lies in. -/
def part (a : α) : Finset α := if ha : a ∈ s then choose (hp := P.existsUnique_mem ha) else ∅
@[simp]
lemma part_mem : P.part a ∈ P.parts ↔ a ∈ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> simp [part, ha, choose_mem]
@[simp]
lemma part_eq_empty : P.part a = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h has ↦ P.ne_empty (P.part_mem.2 has) h, fun h ↦ by simp [part, h]⟩
@[simp]
lemma part_nonempty : (P.part a).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
simpa only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] using P.part_eq_empty.not_left
@[simp]
lemma part_subset (a : α) : P.part a ⊆ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· exact P.le <| P.part_mem.2 ha
· simp [P.part_eq_empty.2 ha]
@[simp]
lemma mem_part_self : a ∈ P.part a ↔ a ∈ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
| · simp [part, ha, choose_property (p := fun s => a ∈ s) P.parts (P.existsUnique_mem ha)]
· simp [P.part_eq_empty.2, ha]
alias ⟨_, mem_part⟩ := mem_part_self
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Finpartition.lean | 534 | 537 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.ZMod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials and `expand`.
We gather results relating cyclotomic polynomials and `expand`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul` : If `p` is a prime such that `¬ p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = (cyclotomic (n * p) R) * (cyclotomic n R)`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic` : If `p` is a prime such that `p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (p * n) R`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_eq_pow_of_not_dvd` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and
`¬p ∣ n`, then `cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ (p - 1)`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_dvd_eq_pow` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ p`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_pow_eq` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `¬p ∣ m`, then
`cyclotomic (p ^ k * m) R = (cyclotomic m R) ^ (p ^ k - p ^ (k - 1))`.
-/
namespace Polynomial
/-- If `p` is a prime such that `¬ p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = (cyclotomic (n * p) R) * (cyclotomic n R)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n)
(R : Type*) [CommRing R] :
expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R * cyclotomic n R := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hnpos
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ * cyclotomic n ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int,
map_cyclotomic]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le ((cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ).mul (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· refine (IsPrimitive.Int.dvd_iff_map_cast_dvd_map_cast _ _
(IsPrimitive.mul (cyclotomic.isPrimitive (n * p) ℤ) (cyclotomic.isPrimitive n ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos).isPrimitive).2 ?_
rw [Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int, map_cyclotomic_int, map_expand, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine IsCoprime.mul_dvd (cyclotomic.isCoprime_rat fun h => ?_) ?_ ?_
· replace h : n * p = n * 1 := by simp [h]
exact Nat.Prime.ne_one hp (mul_left_cancel₀ hnpos.ne' h)
· have hpos : 0 < n * p := mul_pos hnpos hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne'
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
· have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hnpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def, ←
cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos, map_cyclotomic, @isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_prime hprim hp hdiv
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_mul (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ) (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ), natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul ((Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp).2 hdiv), Nat.totient_prime hp,
mul_comm (p - 1), ← Nat.mul_succ, Nat.sub_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hp.pos]
/-- If `p` is a prime such that `p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (p * n) R`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : p ∣ n) (R : Type*)
[CommRing R] : expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hzero)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hzero
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ)
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· have hpos := Nat.mul_pos hzero hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (hprim.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos]
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic, natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul_of_prime_of_dvd hp hdiv, mul_comm]
/-- If the `p ^ n`th cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible, so is the `p ^ m`th, for `m ≤ n`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_irreducible_pow_of_irreducible_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) {R} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] {n m : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (h : Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)) :
Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ m) R) := by
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hm)
· simpa using irreducible_X_sub_C (1 : R)
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
induction' k with k hk
· simpa using h
have : m + k ≠ 0 := (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hm k.zero_le).ne'
rw [Nat.add_succ, pow_succ, ← cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic hp <| dvd_pow_self p this] at h
exact hk (by omega) (of_irreducible_expand hp.ne_zero h)
/-- If `Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)` then `Irreducible (cyclotomic p R).` -/
theorem cyclotomic_irreducible_of_irreducible_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) {R} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)) :
Irreducible (cyclotomic p R) :=
pow_one p ▸ cyclotomic_irreducible_pow_of_irreducible_pow hp hn.bot_lt h
section CharP
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `¬p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ (p - 1)`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_mul_prime_eq_pow_of_not_dvd (R : Type*) {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)]
[Ring R] [CharP R p] (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : cyclotomic (n * p) R = cyclotomic n R ^ (p - 1) := by
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) R := ZMod.algebra _ _
suffices cyclotomic (n * p) (ZMod p) = cyclotomic n (ZMod p) ^ (p - 1) by
rw [← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R), ← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R),
this, Polynomial.map_pow]
apply mul_right_injective₀ (cyclotomic_ne_zero n <| ZMod p); dsimp
rw [← pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, mul_comm, ← ZMod.expand_card]
conv_rhs => rw [← map_cyclotomic_int]
rw [← map_expand, cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul hp.out hn, Polynomial.map_mul,
map_cyclotomic, map_cyclotomic]
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ p`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_mul_prime_dvd_eq_pow (R : Type*) {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] [Ring R]
[CharP R p] (hn : p ∣ n) : cyclotomic (n * p) R = cyclotomic n R ^ p := by
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) R := ZMod.algebra _ _
suffices cyclotomic (n * p) (ZMod p) = cyclotomic n (ZMod p) ^ p by
rw [← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R), ← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R),
this, Polynomial.map_pow]
rw [← ZMod.expand_card, ← map_cyclotomic_int n, ← map_expand,
| cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic hp.out hn, map_cyclotomic]
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `¬p ∣ m`, then
`cyclotomic (p ^ k * m) R = (cyclotomic m R) ^ (p ^ k - p ^ (k - 1))`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_mul_prime_pow_eq (R : Type*) {p m : ℕ} [Fact (Nat.Prime p)] [Ring R] [CharP R p]
(hm : ¬p ∣ m) : ∀ {k}, 0 < k → cyclotomic (p ^ k * m) R = cyclotomic m R ^ (p ^ k - p ^ (k - 1))
| 1, _ => by
rw [pow_one, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, mul_comm, cyclotomic_mul_prime_eq_pow_of_not_dvd R hm]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Expand.lean | 139 | 146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Additional lemmas about elements of a ring satisfying `IsCoprime`
and elements of a monoid satisfying `IsRelPrime`
These lemmas are in a separate file to the definition of `IsCoprime` or `IsRelPrime`
as they require more imports.
Notably, this includes lemmas about `Finset.prod` as this requires importing BigOperators, and
lemmas about `Pow` since these are easiest to prove via `Finset.prod`.
-/
universe u v
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section IsCoprime
variable {R : Type u} {I : Type v} [CommSemiring R] {x y z : R} {s : I → R} {t : Finset I}
section
theorem Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℤ} : IsCoprime m n ↔ Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h⟩
refine Nat.dvd_one.mp (Int.gcd_dvd_iff.mpr ⟨a, b, ?_⟩)
rwa [mul_comm m, mul_comm n, eq_comm]
· rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, IsCoprime, Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, mul_comm m, mul_comm n, Nat.cast_one]
intro h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime {m n : ℕ} : IsCoprime (m : ℤ) n ↔ Nat.Coprime m n := by
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
alias ⟨IsCoprime.nat_coprime, Nat.Coprime.isCoprime⟩ := Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime
theorem Nat.Coprime.cast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℕ} (h : Nat.Coprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_coprime] at h
rw [← Int.cast_natCast a, ← Int.cast_natCast b]
exact IsCoprime.intCast h
theorem ne_zero_or_ne_zero_of_nat_coprime {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [Nontrivial A] {a b : ℕ}
(h : Nat.Coprime a b) : (a : A) ≠ 0 ∨ (b : A) ≠ 0 :=
IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero (R := A) <| by
simpa only [map_natCast] using IsCoprime.map (Nat.Coprime.isCoprime h) (Int.castRingHom A)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x) → IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ ↦ isCoprime_one_left) fun b t hbt ih H ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at H
exact H.1.mul_left (ih H.2)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i)) → IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left_iff : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (iff_of_true isCoprime_one_left fun _ ↦ by simp) fun b t hbt ih ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, ih, Finset.forall_mem_insert]
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right_iff : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left_iff (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_left (H1 : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime (s i) x :=
IsCoprime.prod_left_iff.1 H1 i hit
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_right (H1 : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i)) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime x (s i) :=
IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.1 H1 i hit
-- Porting note: removed names of things due to linter, but they seem helpful
theorem Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime :
(t : Set I).Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) → (∀ i ∈ t, s i ∣ z) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x) ∣ z := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on t (fun _ _ ↦ one_dvd z)
(by
intro a r har ih Hs Hs1
rw [Finset.prod_insert har]
have aux1 : a ∈ (↑(insert a r) : Set I) := Finset.mem_insert_self a r
refine
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i hir ↦
Hs aux1 (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hir) <| by
rintro rfl
exact har hir).mul_dvd
(Hs1 a aux1) (ih (Hs.mono ?_) fun i hi ↦ Hs1 i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
theorem Fintype.prod_dvd_of_coprime [Fintype I] (Hs : Pairwise (IsCoprime on s))
(Hs1 : ∀ i, s i ∣ z) : (∏ x, s x) ∣ z :=
Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime (Hs.set_pairwise _) fun i _ ↦ Hs1 i
end
open Finset
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime [DecidableEq I] (h : t.Nonempty) :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) = 1) ↔
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) := by
induction h using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton =>
simp [exists_apply_eq, Pairwise, Function.onFun]
| cons a t hat h ih =>
rw [pairwise_cons']
have mem : ∀ x ∈ t, a ∈ insert a t \ {x} := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, fun ha ↦ hat (ha ▸ hx)⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat] at hμ
refine ⟨ih.mp ⟨Pi.single h.choose (μ a * s h.choose) + μ * fun _ ↦ s a, ?_⟩, fun b hb ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h.choose_spec, ← mul_assoc, ←
@if_pos _ _ h.choose_spec R (_ * _) 0, ← sum_pi_single', ← sum_add_distrib] at hμ
rw [← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
dsimp -- Porting note: terms were showing as sort of `HAdd.hadd` instead of `+`
-- this whole proof pretty much breaks and has to be rewritten from scratch
rw [add_mul]
congr 1
· by_cases hx : x = h.choose
· rw [hx, Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, zero_mul]
· rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _, mul_comm]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· have : IsCoprime (s b) (s a) :=
⟨μ a * ∏ i ∈ t \ {b}, s i, ∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j, ?_⟩
· exact ⟨this.symm, this⟩
rw [mul_assoc, ← prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul hb, sum_mul, ← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· rintro ⟨hs, Hb⟩
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := ih.mpr hs
obtain ⟨u, v, huv⟩ := IsCoprime.prod_left fun b hb ↦ (Hb b hb).right
use fun i ↦ if i = a then u else v * μ i
have hμ' : (∑ i ∈ t, v * ((μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) * s a)) = v * s a := by
rw [← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, hμ, one_mul]
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat]
simp only [↓reduceIte, ite_mul]
rw [← huv, ← hμ', sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc, if_neg fun ha : x = a ↦ hat (ha.casesOn hx)]
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime' [Fintype I] [Nonempty I] [DecidableEq I] :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i : I, μ i * ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, s j) = 1) ↔ Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) := by
convert exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime Finset.univ_nonempty (s := s) using 1
simp only [Function.onFun, pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_finset', coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem pairwise_coprime_iff_coprime_prod [DecidableEq I] :
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) (∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) := by
refine ⟨fun hp i hi ↦ IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mpr fun j hj ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton] at hj
obtain ⟨hj, ji⟩ := hj
refine @hp ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ fun h ↦ ji (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm
-- Porting note: is there a better way compared to the old `congr_arg coe h`?
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h
apply IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mp (hp i hi)
exact Finset.mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hj, fun f ↦ h <| Subtype.ext (Finset.mem_singleton.mp f).symm⟩
variable {m n : ℕ}
theorem IsCoprime.pow_left (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) y := by
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_left fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow_right (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime x (y ^ n) := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_right fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) :=
H.pow_left.pow_right
theorem IsCoprime.pow_left_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) y ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsCoprime.pow_left⟩
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const] at h
exact h.of_prod_left 0 (Finset.mem_range.mpr hm)
theorem IsCoprime.pow_right_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsCoprime x (y ^ m) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
isCoprime_comm.trans <| (IsCoprime.pow_left_iff hm).trans <| isCoprime_comm
theorem IsCoprime.pow_iff (hm : 0 < m) (hn : 0 < n) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
(IsCoprime.pow_left_iff hm).trans <| IsCoprime.pow_right_iff hn
end IsCoprime
section RelPrime
variable {α I} [CommMonoid α] [DecompositionMonoid α] {x y z : α} {s : I → α} {t : Finset I}
theorem IsRelPrime.prod_left : (∀ i ∈ t, IsRelPrime (s i) x) → IsRelPrime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ ↦ isRelPrime_one_left) fun b t hbt ih H ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at H
exact H.1.mul_left (ih H.2)
theorem IsRelPrime.prod_right : (∀ i ∈ t, IsRelPrime x (s i)) → IsRelPrime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) := by
simpa only [isRelPrime_comm] using IsRelPrime.prod_left (α := α)
theorem IsRelPrime.prod_left_iff : IsRelPrime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsRelPrime (s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (iff_of_true isRelPrime_one_left fun _ ↦ by simp) fun b t hbt ih ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt, IsRelPrime.mul_left_iff, ih, Finset.forall_mem_insert]
theorem IsRelPrime.prod_right_iff : IsRelPrime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsRelPrime x (s i) := by
simpa only [isRelPrime_comm] using IsRelPrime.prod_left_iff (α := α)
theorem IsRelPrime.of_prod_left (H1 : IsRelPrime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsRelPrime (s i) x :=
IsRelPrime.prod_left_iff.1 H1 i hit
theorem IsRelPrime.of_prod_right (H1 : IsRelPrime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i)) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsRelPrime x (s i) :=
IsRelPrime.prod_right_iff.1 H1 i hit
theorem Finset.prod_dvd_of_isRelPrime :
(t : Set I).Pairwise (IsRelPrime on s) → (∀ i ∈ t, s i ∣ z) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x) ∣ z := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on t (fun _ _ ↦ one_dvd z)
(by
intro a r har ih Hs Hs1
rw [Finset.prod_insert har]
have aux1 : a ∈ (↑(insert a r) : Set I) := Finset.mem_insert_self a r
refine
(IsRelPrime.prod_right fun i hir ↦
Hs aux1 (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hir) <| by
rintro rfl
exact har hir).mul_dvd
(Hs1 a aux1) (ih (Hs.mono ?_) fun i hi ↦ Hs1 i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
theorem Fintype.prod_dvd_of_isRelPrime [Fintype I] (Hs : Pairwise (IsRelPrime on s))
(Hs1 : ∀ i, s i ∣ z) : (∏ x, s x) ∣ z :=
Finset.prod_dvd_of_isRelPrime (Hs.set_pairwise _) fun i _ ↦ Hs1 i
theorem pairwise_isRelPrime_iff_isRelPrime_prod [DecidableEq I] :
Pairwise (IsRelPrime on fun i : t ↦ s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsRelPrime (s i) (∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) := by
refine ⟨fun hp i hi ↦ IsRelPrime.prod_right_iff.mpr fun j hj ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton] at hj
obtain ⟨hj, ji⟩ := hj
exact @hp ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ fun h ↦ ji (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h
apply IsRelPrime.prod_right_iff.mp (hp i hi)
exact Finset.mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hj, fun f ↦ h <| Subtype.ext (Finset.mem_singleton.mp f).symm⟩
namespace IsRelPrime
variable {m n : ℕ}
theorem pow_left (H : IsRelPrime x y) : IsRelPrime (x ^ m) y := by
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsRelPrime.prod_left fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem pow_right (H : IsRelPrime x y) : IsRelPrime x (y ^ n) := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsRelPrime.prod_right fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem pow (H : IsRelPrime x y) : IsRelPrime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) :=
H.pow_left.pow_right
theorem pow_left_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsRelPrime (x ^ m) y ↔ IsRelPrime x y := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsRelPrime.pow_left⟩
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const] at h
exact h.of_prod_left 0 (Finset.mem_range.mpr hm)
theorem pow_right_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsRelPrime x (y ^ m) ↔ IsRelPrime x y :=
isRelPrime_comm.trans <| (IsRelPrime.pow_left_iff hm).trans <| isRelPrime_comm
theorem pow_iff (hm : 0 < m) (hn : 0 < n) :
IsRelPrime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) ↔ IsRelPrime x y :=
(IsRelPrime.pow_left_iff hm).trans (IsRelPrime.pow_right_iff hn)
end IsRelPrime
end RelPrime
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Lemmas.lean | 299 | 301 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Substructures
/-!
# Elementary Maps Between First-Order Structures
## Main Definitions
- A `FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding` is an embedding that commutes with the
realizations of formulas.
- The `FirstOrder.Language.elementaryDiagram` of a structure is the set of all sentences with
parameters that the structure satisfies.
- `FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.ofModelsElementaryDiagram` is the canonical
elementary embedding of any structure into a model of its elementary diagram.
## Main Results
- The Tarski-Vaught Test for embeddings: `FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.isElementary_of_exists`
gives a simple criterion for an embedding to be elementary.
-/
open FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure
variable (L : Language) (M : Type*) (N : Type*) {P : Type*} {Q : Type*}
variable [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P] [L.Structure Q]
/-- An elementary embedding of first-order structures is an embedding that commutes with the
realizations of formulas. -/
structure ElementaryEmbedding where
/-- The underlying embedding -/
toFun : M → N
-- Porting note:
-- The autoparam here used to be `obviously`.
-- We have replaced it with `aesop` but that isn't currently sufficient.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Aesop.20and.20cases
-- If that can be improved, we should remove the proofs below.
map_formula' :
∀ ⦃n⦄ (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) (x : Fin n → M), φ.Realize (toFun ∘ x) ↔ φ.Realize x := by
aesop
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding]
scoped[FirstOrder] notation:25 A " ↪ₑ[" L "] " B => FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
namespace ElementaryEmbedding
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instFunLike : FunLike (M ↪ₑ[L] N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [ElementaryEmbedding.mk.injEq]
ext x
exact funext_iff.1 h x
@[simp]
theorem map_boundedFormula (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n)
(v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) : φ.Realize (f ∘ v) (f ∘ xs) ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
classical
rw [← BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar' Set.Subset.rfl, Set.inclusion_eq_id, iff_eq_eq]
have h :=
f.map_formula' ((φ.restrictFreeVar id).toFormula.relabel (Fintype.equivFin _))
(Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs ∘ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm)
simp only [Formula.realize_relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_toFormula, iff_eq_eq] at h
rw [← Function.comp_assoc _ _ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm,
Function.comp_assoc _ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm (Fintype.equivFin _),
_root_.Equiv.symm_comp_self, Function.comp_id, Function.comp_assoc, Sum.elim_comp_inl,
Function.comp_assoc _ _ Sum.inr, Sum.elim_comp_inr, ← Function.comp_assoc] at h
refine h.trans ?_
erw [Function.comp_assoc _ _ (Fintype.equivFin _), _root_.Equiv.symm_comp_self,
Function.comp_id, Sum.elim_comp_inl, Sum.elim_comp_inr (v ∘ Subtype.val) xs,
← Set.inclusion_eq_id (s := (BoundedFormula.freeVarFinset φ : Set α)) Set.Subset.rfl,
BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar' Set.Subset.rfl]
@[simp]
theorem map_formula (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) {α : Type*} (φ : L.Formula α) (x : α → M) :
φ.Realize (f ∘ x) ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [Formula.Realize, Formula.Realize, ← f.map_boundedFormula, Unique.eq_default (f ∘ default)]
theorem map_sentence (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
rw [Sentence.Realize, Sentence.Realize, ← f.map_formula, Unique.eq_default (f ∘ default)]
theorem theory_model_iff (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) (T : L.Theory) : M ⊨ T ↔ N ⊨ T := by
simp only [Theory.model_iff, f.map_sentence]
theorem elementarilyEquivalent (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) : M ≅[L] N :=
elementarilyEquivalent_iff.2 f.map_sentence
@[simp]
theorem injective (φ : M ↪ₑ[L] N) : Function.Injective φ := by
intro x y
have h :=
φ.map_formula ((var 0).equal (var 1) : L.Formula (Fin 2)) fun i => if i = 0 then x else y
rw [Formula.realize_equal, Formula.realize_equal] at h
simp only [Nat.one_ne_zero, Term.realize, Fin.one_eq_zero_iff, if_true, eq_self_iff_true,
Function.comp_apply, if_false] at h
exact h.1
instance embeddingLike : EmbeddingLike (M ↪ₑ[L] N) M N :=
{ show FunLike (M ↪ₑ[L] N) M N from inferInstance with injective' := injective }
| @[simp]
theorem map_fun (φ : M ↪ₑ[L] N) {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M) :
φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x) := by
have h := φ.map_formula (Formula.graph f) (Fin.cons (funMap f x) x)
rw [Formula.realize_graph, Fin.comp_cons, Formula.realize_graph] at h
rw [eq_comm, h]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/ElementaryMaps.lean | 117 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
end NoBotOrder
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot F]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (hlim : Filter.Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨆ i, f i = a :=
have := F.nonempty_of_neBot
(IsLUB.range_of_tendsto hle hlim).ciSup_eq
theorem iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, f i < a) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Iic (f i) = Iio a := by
have obs : a ∉ range f := by
rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (hlt i).false
rw [← biUnion_range, (IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (le_of_lt <| hlt ·) hlim).biUnion_Iic_eq_Iio obs]
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Ioi : IsOpen (Ioi a) := by
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
isOpen_Ioi.interior_eq
theorem Ioi_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioi h
theorem eventually_gt_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b < x := Ioi_mem_nhds hab
theorem Ici_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ici a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_nhds h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem eventually_ge_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b ≤ x := Ici_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u < f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_gt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_gt_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u ≤ f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_ge_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le
protected theorem Dense.exists_gt [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi (exists_gt x)
protected theorem Dense.exists_ge [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(hs.exists_gt x).imp fun _ h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩
theorem Dense.exists_ge' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (htop : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := by
by_cases hx : IsTop x
· exact ⟨x, htop x hx, le_rfl⟩
· simp only [IsTop, not_forall, not_le] at hx
rcases hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi hx with ⟨y, hys, hy : x < y⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, hy.le⟩
/-!
### Left neighborhoods on a `ClosedIicTopology`
Limits to the left of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the left,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[<] a` and `𝓝[≤] a`.
Here we prove that all left-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := by
simpa only [← Iio_inter_Ioi] using inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (Ioi_mem_nhds H)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT H.1) <| Ioo_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[<] b = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| h.Ioo_eq ▸ Ioo_mem_nhdsLT h.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iio := CovBy.nhdsLT
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLT [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ := by
if h : IsMin a then simp [h.Iio_eq]
else exact (Order.pred_covBy_of_not_isMin h).nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iio := PredOrder.nhdsLT
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝[≠] a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGT, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGE, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ico_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Icc_mem_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT h]
/-!
#### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, H.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iic := CovBy.nhdsLE
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLE [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, PredOrder.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iic := PredOrder.nhdsLE
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
inter_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds H) self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioc_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioc_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Icc_mem_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Icc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Icc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Icc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE h]
| end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 408 | 409 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `List.formPerm` is implemented as a product of `Equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `List.formPerm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `Nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `List.formPerm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section FormPerm
variable [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
/-- A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
-/
def formPerm : Equiv.Perm α :=
(zipWith Equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_nil : formPerm ([] : List α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_singleton (x : α) : formPerm [x] = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : List α) :
formPerm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * formPerm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
theorem formPerm_pair (x y : α) : formPerm [x, y] = swap x y :=
rfl
theorem mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne : ∀ {l l' : List α} {x : α},
(zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x → x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ l'
| [], _, _ => by simp
| _, [], _ => by simp
| a::l, b::l', x => fun hx ↦
if h : (zipWith swap l l').prod x = x then
(eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self (a := a) (b := b) (x := x) (by simpa [h] using hx)).imp
(by rintro rfl; exact .head _) (by rintro rfl; exact .head _)
else
(mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h).imp (.tail _) (.tail _)
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support' (l l' : List α) :
{ x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := fun _ h ↦ by
simpa using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support [Fintype α] (l l' : List α) :
(zipWith swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using zipWith_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
theorem support_formPerm_le' : { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset := by
refine (zipWith_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans ?_
simpa [Finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
theorem support_formPerm_le [Fintype α] : support (formPerm l) ≤ l.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using support_formPerm_le' _ hx'
variable {l} {x : α}
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne (h : l.formPerm x ≠ x) : x ∈ l := by
simpa [or_iff_left_of_imp mem_of_mem_tail] using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_of_not_mem (h : x ∉ l) : formPerm l x = x :=
not_imp_comm.1 mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem (h : x ∈ l) : formPerm l x ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨y, l⟩
· simp at h
induction' l with z l IH generalizing x y
· simpa using h
· by_cases hx : x ∈ z :: l
· rw [formPerm_cons_cons, mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs
· simp [IH _ hx]
· simp
· simp [*]
· replace h : x = y := Or.resolve_right (mem_cons.1 h) hx
simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, ← h]
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem (h : l.formPerm x ∈ l) : x ∈ l := by
contrapose h
rwa [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_mem_iff_mem : l.formPerm x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ l :=
⟨l.mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem, l.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_concat_apply_last (x y : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: (xs ++ [y])) y = x := by
induction' xs with z xs IH generalizing x y
· simp
· simp [IH]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getLast (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs)) = x := by
induction' xs using List.reverseRecOn with xs y _ generalizing x <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_length (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) (x :: xs)[xs.length] = x := by
rw [getElem_cons_length rfl, formPerm_apply_getLast]
theorem formPerm_apply_head (x y : α) (xs : List α) (h : Nodup (x :: y :: xs)) :
formPerm (x :: y :: xs) x = y := by simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h.not_mem]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_zero (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
formPerm l l[0] = l[1] := by
rcases l with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hl
· simp at hl
· rw [getElem_cons_zero, formPerm_apply_head _ _ _ h, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero]
variable (l)
theorem formPerm_eq_head_iff_eq_getLast (x y : α) :
formPerm (y :: l) x = y ↔ x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [formPerm_apply_getLast]) (formPerm (y :: l)).injective.eq_iff
theorem formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[n] = xs[n + 1] := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing xs
· simpa using formPerm_apply_getElem_zero _ h _
· rcases xs with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, l⟩⟩)
· simp at hn
· rw [formPerm_singleton, getElem_singleton, getElem_singleton, one_apply]
· specialize IH (y :: l) h.of_cons _
· simpa [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn
simp only [swap_apply_eq_iff, coe_mul, formPerm_cons_cons, Function.comp]
simp only [getElem_cons_succ] at *
rw [← IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
· intro hx
rw [← hx, IH] at h
simp [getElem_mem] at h
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem (xs : List α) (w : Nodup xs) (i : ℕ) (h : i < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[i] =
xs[(i + 1) % xs.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨x, xs⟩
· simp at h
· have : i ≤ xs.length := by
refine Nat.le_of_lt_succ ?_
simpa using h
rcases this.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hn')
· simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (x :: xs) w _ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hn')]
congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup' (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
{ x | formPerm l x ≠ x } = l.toFinset := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· exact support_formPerm_le' l
· intro x hx
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset] at hx
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, formPerm_apply_getElem _ h]
intro H
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get, Function.Injective] at h
specialize h H
rcases (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn).eq_or_lt with hn' | hn'
· simp only [← hn', Nat.mod_self] at h
refine not_exists.mpr h' ?_
rw [← length_eq_one_iff, ← hn', (Fin.mk.inj_iff.mp h).symm]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn'] at h
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup [Fintype α] (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset := by
rw [← Finset.coe_inj]
convert support_formPerm_of_nodup' _ h h'
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem formPerm_rotate_one (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) : formPerm (l.rotate 1) = formPerm l := by
have h' : Nodup (l.rotate 1) := by simpa using h
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l.rotate 1
· obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [formPerm_apply_getElem _ h', getElem_rotate l, getElem_rotate l, formPerm_apply_getElem _ h]
simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, formPerm_apply_of_not_mem]
simpa using hx
theorem formPerm_rotate (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) :
formPerm (l.rotate n) = formPerm l := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [← rotate_rotate, formPerm_rotate_one, hn]
rwa [IsRotated.nodup_iff]
exact IsRotated.forall l n
theorem formPerm_eq_of_isRotated {l l' : List α} (hd : Nodup l) (h : l ~r l') :
formPerm l = formPerm l' := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
exact (formPerm_rotate l hd n).symm
theorem formPerm_append_pair : ∀ (l : List α) (a b : α),
formPerm (l ++ [a, b]) = formPerm (l ++ [a]) * swap a b
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| x::y::l, a, b => by
simpa [mul_assoc] using formPerm_append_pair (y::l) a b
theorem formPerm_reverse : ∀ l : List α, formPerm l.reverse = (formPerm l)⁻¹
| [] => rfl
| [_] => rfl
| a::b::l => by
simp [formPerm_append_pair, swap_comm, ← formPerm_reverse (b::l)]
theorem formPerm_pow_apply_getElem (l : List α) (w : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) (i : ℕ) (h : i < l.length) :
(formPerm l ^ n) l[i] =
l[(i + n) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
| induction n with
| zero => simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
| succ n hn =>
simp [pow_succ', mul_apply, hn, formPerm_apply_getElem _ w, Nat.succ_eq_add_one,
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/List.lean | 251 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Johan Commelin, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Monoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# The basics of valuation theory.
The basic theory of valuations (non-archimedean norms) on a commutative ring,
following T. Wedhorn's unpublished notes “Adic Spaces” ([wedhorn_adic]).
The definition of a valuation we use here is Definition 1.22 of [wedhorn_adic].
A valuation on a ring `R` is a monoid homomorphism `v` to a linearly ordered
commutative monoid with zero, that in addition satisfies the following two axioms:
* `v 0 = 0`
* `∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ max (v x) (v y)`
`Valuation R Γ₀` is the type of valuations `R → Γ₀`, with a coercion to the underlying
function. If `v` is a valuation from `R` to `Γ₀` then the induced group
homomorphism `Units(R) → Γ₀` is called `unit_map v`.
The equivalence "relation" `IsEquiv v₁ v₂ : Prop` defined in 1.27 of [wedhorn_adic] is not strictly
speaking a relation, because `v₁ : Valuation R Γ₁` and `v₂ : Valuation R Γ₂` might
not have the same type. This corresponds in ZFC to the set-theoretic difficulty
that the class of all valuations (as `Γ₀` varies) on a ring `R` is not a set.
The "relation" is however reflexive, symmetric and transitive in the obvious
sense. Note that we use 1.27(iii) of [wedhorn_adic] as the definition of equivalence.
## Main definitions
* `Valuation R Γ₀`, the type of valuations on `R` with values in `Γ₀`
* `Valuation.IsNontrivial` is the class of non-trivial valuations, namely those for which there
is an element in the ring whose valuation is `≠ 0` and `≠ 1`.
* `Valuation.IsEquiv`, the heterogeneous equivalence relation on valuations
* `Valuation.supp`, the support of a valuation
* `AddValuation R Γ₀`, the type of additive valuations on `R` with values in a
linearly ordered additive commutative group with a top element, `Γ₀`.
## Implementation Details
`AddValuation R Γ₀` is implemented as `Valuation R (Multiplicative Γ₀)ᵒᵈ`.
## Notation
In the `DiscreteValuation` locale:
* `ℕₘ₀` is a shorthand for `WithZero (Multiplicative ℕ)`
* `ℤₘ₀` is a shorthand for `WithZero (Multiplicative ℤ)`
## TODO
If ever someone extends `Valuation`, we should fully comply to the `DFunLike` by migrating the
boilerplate lemmas to `ValuationClass`.
-/
open Function Ideal
noncomputable section
variable {K F R : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
section
variable (F R) (Γ₀ : Type*) [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [Ring R]
/-- The type of `Γ₀`-valued valuations on `R`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `ValuationClass`. -/
structure Valuation extends R →*₀ Γ₀ where
/-- The valuation of a sum is less than or equal to the maximum of the valuations. -/
map_add_le_max' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) ≤ max (toFun x) (toFun y)
/-- `ValuationClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of valuations.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `Valuation`. -/
class ValuationClass (F) (R Γ₀ : outParam Type*) [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [Ring R]
[FunLike F R Γ₀] : Prop
extends MonoidWithZeroHomClass F R Γ₀ where
/-- The valuation of a sum is less than or equal to the maximum of the valuations. -/
map_add_le_max (f : F) (x y : R) : f (x + y) ≤ max (f x) (f y)
export ValuationClass (map_add_le_max)
instance [FunLike F R Γ₀] [ValuationClass F R Γ₀] : CoeTC F (Valuation R Γ₀) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
map_zero' := map_zero f
map_mul' := map_mul f
map_add_le_max' := map_add_le_max f }⟩
end
namespace Valuation
variable {Γ₀ : Type*}
variable {Γ'₀ : Type*}
variable {Γ''₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀]
section Basic
variable [Ring R]
section Monoid
variable [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ'₀]
instance : FunLike (Valuation R Γ₀) R Γ₀ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_,_⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f
congr
instance : ValuationClass (Valuation R Γ₀) R Γ₀ where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_max f := f.map_add_le_max'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : R →*₀ Γ₀) (h) : ⇑(Valuation.mk f h) = f := rfl
theorem toFun_eq_coe (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : v.toFun = v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMonoidWithZeroHom_coe_eq_coe (v : Valuation R Γ₀) :
(v.toMonoidWithZeroHom : R → Γ₀) = v := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {v₁ v₂ : Valuation R Γ₀} (h : ∀ r, v₁ r = v₂ r) : v₁ = v₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
variable (v : Valuation R Γ₀)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_coe : ⇑(v : R →*₀ Γ₀) = v := rfl
protected theorem map_zero : v 0 = 0 :=
v.map_zero'
protected theorem map_one : v 1 = 1 :=
v.map_one'
protected theorem map_mul : ∀ x y, v (x * y) = v x * v y :=
v.map_mul'
-- Porting note: LHS side simplified so created map_add'
protected theorem map_add : ∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ max (v x) (v y) :=
v.map_add_le_max'
@[simp]
theorem map_add' : ∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ v x ∨ v (x + y) ≤ v y := by
intro x y
rw [← le_max_iff, ← ge_iff_le]
apply v.map_add
theorem map_add_le {x y g} (hx : v x ≤ g) (hy : v y ≤ g) : v (x + y) ≤ g :=
le_trans (v.map_add x y) <| max_le hx hy
theorem map_add_lt {x y g} (hx : v x < g) (hy : v y < g) : v (x + y) < g :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (v.map_add x y) <| max_lt hx hy
theorem map_sum_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) ≤ g) :
v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ g := by
classical
refine
Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => v.map_zero ▸ zero_le')
(fun a s has ih hf => ?_) hf
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf; rw [Finset.sum_insert has]
exact v.map_add_le hf.1 (ih hf.2)
theorem map_sum_lt {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hg : g ≠ 0)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) < g) : v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) < g := by
classical
refine
Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => v.map_zero ▸ (zero_lt_iff.2 hg))
(fun a s has ih hf => ?_) hf
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf; rw [Finset.sum_insert has]
exact v.map_add_lt hf.1 (ih hf.2)
theorem map_sum_lt' {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hg : 0 < g)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) < g) : v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) < g :=
v.map_sum_lt (ne_of_gt hg) hf
protected theorem map_pow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), v (x ^ n) = v x ^ n :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_pow
-- The following definition is not an instance, because we have more than one `v` on a given `R`.
-- In addition, type class inference would not be able to infer `v`.
/-- A valuation gives a preorder on the underlying ring. -/
def toPreorder : Preorder R :=
Preorder.lift v
/-- If `v` is a valuation on a division ring then `v(x) = 0` iff `x = 0`. -/
theorem zero_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
map_eq_zero v
theorem ne_zero_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero v
lemma pos_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : 0 < v x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [zero_lt_iff, ne_zero_iff]
theorem unit_map_eq (u : Rˣ) : (Units.map (v : R →* Γ₀) u : Γ₀) = v u :=
rfl
theorem ne_zero_of_unit [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : Kˣ) : v x ≠ (0 : Γ₀) := by
simp only [ne_eq, Valuation.zero_iff, Units.ne_zero x, not_false_iff]
theorem ne_zero_of_isUnit [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) (hx : IsUnit x) :
v x ≠ (0 : Γ₀) := by
simpa [hx.choose_spec] using ne_zero_of_unit v hx.choose
/-- A ring homomorphism `S → R` induces a map `Valuation R Γ₀ → Valuation S Γ₀`. -/
def comap {S : Type*} [Ring S] (f : S →+* R) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : Valuation S Γ₀ :=
{ v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.comp f.toMonoidWithZeroHom with
toFun := v ∘ f
map_add_le_max' := fun x y => by simp only [comp_apply, v.map_add, map_add] }
@[simp]
theorem comap_apply {S : Type*} [Ring S] (f : S →+* R) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (s : S) :
v.comap f s = v (f s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : v.comap (RingHom.id R) = v :=
ext fun _r => rfl
theorem comap_comp {S₁ : Type*} {S₂ : Type*} [Ring S₁] [Ring S₂] (f : S₁ →+* S₂) (g : S₂ →+* R) :
v.comap (g.comp f) = (v.comap g).comap f :=
ext fun _r => rfl
/-- A `≤`-preserving group homomorphism `Γ₀ → Γ'₀` induces a map `Valuation R Γ₀ → Valuation R Γ'₀`.
-/
def map (f : Γ₀ →*₀ Γ'₀) (hf : Monotone f) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : Valuation R Γ'₀ :=
{ MonoidWithZeroHom.comp f v.toMonoidWithZeroHom with
toFun := f ∘ v
map_add_le_max' := fun r s =>
calc
f (v (r + s)) ≤ f (max (v r) (v s)) := hf (v.map_add r s)
_ = max (f (v r)) (f (v s)) := hf.map_max
}
@[simp]
lemma map_apply (f : Γ₀ →*₀ Γ'₀) (hf : Monotone f) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (r : R) :
v.map f hf r = f (v r) := rfl
/-- Two valuations on `R` are defined to be equivalent if they induce the same preorder on `R`. -/
def IsEquiv (v₁ : Valuation R Γ₀) (v₂ : Valuation R Γ'₀) : Prop :=
∀ r s, v₁ r ≤ v₁ s ↔ v₂ r ≤ v₂ s
@[simp]
theorem map_neg (x : R) : v (-x) = v x :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_neg x
theorem map_sub_swap (x y : R) : v (x - y) = v (y - x) :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_sub_swap x y
theorem map_sub (x y : R) : v (x - y) ≤ max (v x) (v y) :=
calc
v (x - y) = v (x + -y) := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (v x) (v <| -y) := v.map_add _ _
_ = max (v x) (v y) := by rw [map_neg]
theorem map_sub_le {x y g} (hx : v x ≤ g) (hy : v y ≤ g) : v (x - y) ≤ g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact v.map_add_le hx <| (v.map_neg y).trans_le hy
theorem map_sub_lt {x y : R} {g : Γ₀} (hx : v x < g) (hy : v y < g) : v (x - y) < g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact v.map_add_lt hx <| (v.map_neg y).trans_lt hy
variable {x y : R}
theorem map_add_of_distinct_val (h : v x ≠ v y) : v (x + y) = max (v x) (v y) := by
suffices ¬v (x + y) < max (v x) (v y) from
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 (v.map_add x y)) this
intro h'
wlog vyx : v y < v x generalizing x y
· refine this h.symm ?_ (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_right vyx)
rwa [add_comm, max_comm]
rw [max_eq_left_of_lt vyx] at h'
apply lt_irrefl (v x)
calc
v x = v (x + y - y) := by simp
_ ≤ max (v <| x + y) (v y) := map_sub _ _ _
_ < v x := max_lt h' vyx
theorem map_add_eq_of_lt_right (h : v x < v y) : v (x + y) = v y :=
(v.map_add_of_distinct_val h.ne).trans (max_eq_right_iff.mpr h.le)
theorem map_add_eq_of_lt_left (h : v y < v x) : v (x + y) = v x := by
rw [add_comm]; exact map_add_eq_of_lt_right _ h
theorem map_sub_eq_of_lt_right (h : v x < v y) : v (x - y) = v y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, map_add_eq_of_lt_right, map_neg]
rwa [map_neg]
open scoped Classical in
theorem map_sum_eq_of_lt {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {j : ι}
(hj : j ∈ s) (h0 : v (f j) ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s \ {j}, v (f i) < v (f j)) :
v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = v (f j) := by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton hj]
exact map_add_eq_of_lt_left _ (map_sum_lt _ h0 hf)
theorem map_sub_eq_of_lt_left (h : v y < v x) : v (x - y) = v x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, map_add_eq_of_lt_left]
rwa [map_neg]
theorem map_eq_of_sub_lt (h : v (y - x) < v x) : v y = v x := by
have := Valuation.map_add_of_distinct_val v (ne_of_gt h).symm
rw [max_eq_right (le_of_lt h)] at this
simpa using this
theorem map_one_add_of_lt (h : v x < 1) : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
rw [← v.map_one] at h
simpa only [v.map_one] using v.map_add_eq_of_lt_left h
theorem map_one_sub_of_lt (h : v x < 1) : v (1 - x) = 1 := by
rw [← v.map_one, ← v.map_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg 1 x]
simpa only [v.map_one, v.map_neg] using v.map_add_eq_of_lt_left h
/-- An ordered monoid isomorphism `Γ₀ ≃ Γ'₀` induces an equivalence
`Valuation R Γ₀ ≃ Valuation R Γ'₀`. -/
def congr (f : Γ₀ ≃*o Γ'₀) : Valuation R Γ₀ ≃ Valuation R Γ'₀ where
toFun := map f f.toOrderIso.monotone
invFun := map f.symm f.toOrderIso.symm.monotone
left_inv ν := by ext; simp
right_inv ν := by ext; simp
end Monoid
section Group
variable [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) {x y : R}
theorem map_inv {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : ∀ x, v x⁻¹ = (v x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _
theorem map_div {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : ∀ x y, v (x / y) = v x / v y :=
map_div₀ _
theorem one_lt_val_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : 1 < v x ↔ v x⁻¹ < 1 := by
simp [inv_lt_one₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem one_le_val_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ v x ↔ v x⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by
simp [inv_le_one₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_lt_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : v x < 1 ↔ 1 < v x⁻¹ := by
simp [one_lt_inv₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_le_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : v x ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ v x⁻¹ := by
simp [one_le_inv₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_eq_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x = 1 ↔ v x⁻¹ = 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [map_inv₀, inv_eq_one]
· simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, And.comm] using and_congr (one_le_val_iff v h) (val_le_one_iff v h)
theorem val_le_one_or_val_inv_lt_one (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) : v x ≤ 1 ∨ v x⁻¹ < 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, zero_le', inv_zero, zero_lt_one, or_self]
· simp only [← one_lt_val_iff v h, le_or_lt]
/--
This theorem is a weaker version of `Valuation.val_le_one_or_val_inv_lt_one`, but more symmetric
in `x` and `x⁻¹`.
-/
theorem val_le_one_or_val_inv_le_one (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) : v x ≤ 1 ∨ v x⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, zero_le', inv_zero, or_self]
· simp only [← one_le_val_iff v h, le_total]
/-- The subgroup of elements whose valuation is less than a certain unit. -/
def ltAddSubgroup (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (γ : Γ₀ˣ) : AddSubgroup R where
carrier := { x | v x < γ }
zero_mem' := by simp
add_mem' {x y} x_in y_in := lt_of_le_of_lt (v.map_add x y) (max_lt x_in y_in)
neg_mem' x_in := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf, map_neg]
end Group
end Basic
section IsNontrivial
variable [Ring R] [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] (v : Valuation R Γ₀)
/-- A valuation on a ring is nontrivial if there exists an element with valuation
not equal to `0` or `1`. -/
class IsNontrivial : Prop where
exists_val_nontrivial : ∃ x : R, v x ≠ 0 ∧ v x ≠ 1
/-- For fields, being nontrivial is equivalent to the existence of a unit with valuation
not equal to `1`. -/
lemma isNontrivial_iff_exists_unit {K : Type*} [Field K] {w : Valuation K Γ₀} :
w.IsNontrivial ↔ ∃ x : Kˣ, w x ≠ 1 :=
| ⟨fun ⟨x, hx0, hx1⟩ ↦
have : Nontrivial Γ₀ := ⟨w x, 0, hx0⟩
⟨Units.mk0 x (w.ne_zero_iff.mp hx0), hx1⟩,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/Basic.lean | 405 | 407 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.