Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).natDegree = #s - 1 := by
have H : ∀ j, j ∈ s.erase i → basisDivisor (v i) (v j) ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Ne, mem_erase, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact fun j ⟨hij₁, hj⟩ hij₂ => hij₁ (hvs hj hi hij₂.symm)
rw [← card_erase_of_mem hi, card_eq_sum_ones]
convert natDegree_prod _ _ H using 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => (natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne ?_).symm
rw [Ne, ← basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact H _ hj
theorem degree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).degree = ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree (basis_ne_zero hvs hi), natDegree_basis hvs hi]
theorem sum_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∑ j ∈ s, Lagrange.basis s v j = 1 := by
refine eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #s)]
intro i hi
rw [degree_basis hvs hi, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.pred_lt (card_ne_zero_of_mem hi)
· rw [degree_one, ← WithBot.coe_zero, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nonempty.card_pos hs
· intro i hi
rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_one, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi, eval_basis_self hvs hi,
add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi]
theorem basisDivisor_add_symm {x y : F} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
basisDivisor x y + basisDivisor y x = 1 := by
classical
rw [← sum_basis Function.injective_id.injOn ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ {y}⟩,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hxy), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hxy,
basis_pair_right hxy, id, id]
end Basis
section Interpolate
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s t : Finset ι} {i j : ι} {v : ι → F} (r r' : ι → F)
open Finset
/-- Lagrange interpolation: given a finset `s : Finset ι`, a nodal map `v : ι → F` injective on
`s` and a value function `r : ι → F`, `interpolate s v r` is the unique
polynomial of degree `< #s` that takes value `r i` on `v i` for all `i` in `s`. -/
@[simps]
def interpolate (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) : (ι → F) →ₗ[F] F[X] where
toFun r := ∑ i ∈ s, C (r i) * Lagrange.basis s v i
map_add' f g := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have h : (fun x => C (f x) * Lagrange.basis s v x + C (g x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) =
(fun x => C ((f + g) x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) := by
simp_rw [← add_mul, ← C_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [h]
map_smul' c f := by
simp_rw [Finset.smul_sum, C_mul', smul_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem interpolate_empty : interpolate ∅ v r = 0 := by rw [interpolate_apply, sum_empty]
theorem interpolate_singleton : interpolate {i} v r = C (r i) := by
rw [interpolate_apply, sum_singleton, basis_singleton, mul_one]
theorem interpolate_one (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : interpolate s v 1 = 1 := by
simp_rw [interpolate_apply, Pi.one_apply, map_one, one_mul]
exact sum_basis hvs hs
theorem eval_interpolate_at_node (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
eval (v i) (interpolate s v r) = r i := by
rw [interpolate_apply, eval_finset_sum, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi]
simp_rw [eval_mul, eval_C, eval_basis_self hvs hi, mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basis_of_ne (mem_erase.mp H).1 hi, mul_zero]
theorem degree_interpolate_le (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(interpolate s v r).degree ≤ ↑(#s - 1) := by
refine (degree_sum_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro i hi
rw [degree_mul, degree_basis hvs hi]
by_cases hr : r i = 0
· simpa only [hr, map_zero, degree_zero, WithBot.bot_add] using bot_le
· rw [degree_C hr, zero_add]
theorem degree_interpolate_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : (interpolate s v r).degree < #s := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h)
· rw [interpolate_empty, degree_zero, card_empty]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_interpolate_le _ hvs) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.sub_lt (Nonempty.card_pos h) zero_lt_one
theorem degree_interpolate_erase_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(interpolate (s.erase i) v r).degree < ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [← Finset.card_erase_of_mem hi]
exact degree_interpolate_lt _ (Set.InjOn.mono (coe_subset.mpr (erase_subset _ _)) hvs)
theorem values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(hrr' : interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r') : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i := fun _ hi => by
rw [← eval_interpolate_at_node r hvs hi, hrr', eval_interpolate_at_node r' hvs hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on (hrr' : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi => by rw [hrr' _ hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_iff_values_eq_on (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i :=
⟨values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq _ _ hvs, interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _⟩
theorem eq_interpolate {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) :
f = interpolate s v fun i => f.eval (v i) :=
eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs degree_f_lt (degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs) fun _ hi =>
(eval_interpolate_at_node (fun x ↦ eval (v x) f) hvs hi).symm
theorem eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = r i) : f = interpolate s v r := by
rw [eq_interpolate hvs degree_f_lt]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ eval_f
/-- This is the characteristic property of the interpolation: the interpolation is the
unique polynomial of `degree < Fintype.card ι` which takes the value of the `r i` on the `v i`.
-/
theorem eq_interpolate_iff {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(f.degree < #s ∧ ∀ i ∈ s, eval (v i) f = r i) ↔ f = interpolate s v r := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvs h.1 h.2
· rw [h]
exact ⟨degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs, fun _ hi => eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi⟩
/-- Lagrange interpolation induces isomorphism between functions from `s`
and polynomials of degree less than `Fintype.card ι`. -/
def funEquivDegreeLT (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : degreeLT F #s ≃ₗ[F] s → F where
toFun f i := f.1.eval (v i)
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ => eval_add
map_smul' c f := funext <| by simp
invFun r :=
⟨interpolate s v fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then r ⟨x, hx⟩ else 0,
mem_degreeLT.2 <| degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, dite_eq_ite]
rw [mem_degreeLT] at hf
conv => rhs; rw [eq_interpolate hvs hf]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ fun _ hi => if_pos hi
right_inv := by
| intro f
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 387 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Norm
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,574 | 1,576 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, Doga Can Sertbas
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Schnirelmann density
We define the Schnirelmann density of a set `A` of natural numbers as
$inf_{n > 0} |A ∩ {1,...,n}| / n$. As this density is very sensitive to changes in small values,
we must exclude `0` from the infimum, and from the intersection.
## Main statements
* Simple bounds on the Schnirelmann density, that it is between 0 and 1 are given in
`schnirelmannDensity_nonneg` and `schnirelmannDensity_le_one`.
* `schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem`: If `k ∉ A`, the density can be easily upper-bounded by
`1 - k⁻¹`
## Implementation notes
Despite the definition being noncomputable, we include a decidable instance argument, since this
makes the definition easier to use in explicit cases.
Further, we use `Finset.Ioc` rather than a set intersection since the set is finite by construction,
which reduces the proof obligations later that would arise with `Nat.card`.
## TODO
* Give other calculations of the density, for example powers and their sumsets.
* Define other densities like the lower and upper asymptotic density, and the natural density,
and show how these relate to the Schnirelmann density.
* Show that if the sum of two densities is at least one, the sumset covers the positive naturals.
* Prove Schnirelmann's theorem and Mann's theorem on the subadditivity of this density.
## References
* [Ruzsa, Imre, *Sumsets and structure*][ruzsa2009]
-/
open Finset
/-- The Schnirelmann density is defined as the infimum of |A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n as n ranges over
the positive naturals. -/
noncomputable def schnirelmannDensity (A : Set ℕ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] : ℝ :=
⨅ n : {n : ℕ // 0 < n}, #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n
section
variable {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_nonneg : 0 ≤ schnirelmannDensity A :=
Real.iInf_nonneg (fun _ => by positivity)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_div {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩ (⟨n, hn.bot_lt⟩ : {n : ℕ // 0 < n})
/--
For any natural `n`, the Schnirelmann density multiplied by `n` is bounded by `|A ∩ {1, ..., n}|`.
Note this property fails for the natural density.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_mul_le_card_filter {n : ℕ} :
schnirelmannDensity A * n ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
exact (le_div_iff₀ (by positivity)).1 (schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn)
/--
To show the Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `x`, it suffices to show
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n ≤ x`, for any chosen positive value of `n`.
We provide `n` explicitly here to make this lemma more easily usable in `apply` or `refine`.
This lemma is analogous to `ciInf_le_of_le`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hx : #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n ≤ x) : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x :=
(schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn).trans hx
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_one : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 :=
schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le 1 one_ne_zero <|
by rw [Nat.cast_one, div_one, Nat.cast_le_one]; exact card_filter_le _ _
/--
If `k` is omitted from the set, its Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `1 - k⁻¹`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem {k : ℕ} (hk : k ∉ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 - (k⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hk'
· simpa using schnirelmannDensity_le_one
apply schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le k hk'.ne'
rw [← one_div, one_sub_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hk').ne']
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pred hk', Nat.cast_le]
suffices {a ∈ Ioc 0 k | a ∈ A} ⊆ Ioo 0 k from (card_le_card this).trans_eq (by simp)
rw [← Ioo_insert_right hk', filter_insert, if_neg hk]
exact filter_subset _ _
/-- The Schnirelmann density of a set not containing `1` is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (h : 1 ∉ A) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 :=
((schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem h).trans (by simp)).antisymm schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
/-- The Schnirelmann density is increasing with the set. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_subset {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A ⊆ B) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ schnirelmannDensity B :=
ciInf_mono ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ by positivity⟩ fun _ ↦ by
gcongr; exact h
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` is `1` if and only if `A` contains all the positive naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff : schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ {0}ᶜ ⊆ A := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_right schnirelmannDensity_le_one]
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not, not_le]
simp only [Set.not_subset, forall_exists_index, true_and, and_imp, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
intro x hx hx'
apply (schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem hx').trans_lt
simpa only [one_div, sub_lt_self_iff, inv_pos, Nat.cast_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero] using hx
· intro h
refine le_ciInf fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => ?_
rw [one_le_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), Nat.cast_le, filter_true_of_mem, Nat.card_Ioc, Nat.sub_zero]
rintro x hx
exact h (mem_Ioc.1 hx).1.ne'
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` containing `0` is `1` if and only if `A` is the naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (hA : 0 ∈ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ A = Set.univ := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· refine fun h => Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· exact hA
· exact h hx
· rintro rfl
exact Set.subset_univ {0}ᶜ
lemma le_schnirelmannDensity_iff {x : ℝ} :
x ≤ schnirelmannDensity A ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
(le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩).trans Subtype.forall
lemma schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A < x ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x := by
rw [← not_le, le_schnirelmannDensity_iff]; simp
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x ↔
∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr' {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)]
(h : ∀ n > 0, n ∈ A ↔ n ∈ B) : schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity, schnirelmannDensity]; congr; ext ⟨n, hn⟩; congr 3; ext x; aesop
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by adding `0`. -/
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_insert_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ insert 0 A)] :
schnirelmannDensity (insert 0 A) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by removing `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_diff_singleton_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ A \ {0})] :
schnirelmannDensity (A \ {0}) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A = B) :
schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/--
If the Schnirelmann density is `0`, there is a positive natural for which
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n < ε`, for any positive `ε`.
Note this cannot be improved to `∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop`, as can be seen by `A = {1}ᶜ`.
-/
lemma exists_of_schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hA : schnirelmannDensity A = 0) :
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < ε := by
by_contra! h
rw [← le_schnirelmannDensity_iff] at h
linarith
end
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_empty : schnirelmannDensity ∅ = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (by simp)
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finset is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finset (A : Finset ℕ) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall, zero_add]
intro ε hε
wlog hε₁ : ε ≤ 1 generalizing ε
· obtain ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ := this 1 zero_lt_one le_rfl
exact ⟨n, hn, hn'.trans_le (le_of_not_le hε₁)⟩
let n : ℕ := ⌊#A / ε⌋₊ + 1
have hn : 0 < n := Nat.succ_pos _
use n, hn
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), ← div_lt_iff₀' hε, Nat.cast_add_one]
exact (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).trans_le' <| by gcongr; simp [subset_iff]
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finite set is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finite {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] (hA : A.Finite) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by simpa using schnirelmannDensity_finset hA.toFinset
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_univ : schnirelmannDensity Set.univ = 1 :=
(schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (by simp)).2 (by simp)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_even : schnirelmannDensity (setOf Even) = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem <| by simp
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_prime : schnirelmannDensity (setOf Nat.Prime) = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem <| by simp [Nat.not_prime_one]
| /--
The Schnirelmann density of the set of naturals which are `1 mod m` is `m⁻¹`, for any `m ≠ 1`.
Note that if `m = 1`, this set is empty.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_mod_eq_one {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 1) :
schnirelmannDensity {n | n % m = 1} = (m⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hm'
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, inv_zero]
refine schnirelmannDensity_finite ?_
simp
apply le_antisymm (schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le m hm'.ne' _) _
· rw [← one_div, ← @Nat.cast_one ℝ]
gcongr
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton, subset_iff,
mem_filter, mem_Ioc, mem_singleton, and_imp]
use 1
intro x _ hxm h
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxm with rfl | hxm'
· simp at h
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hxm'] at h
rw [le_schnirelmannDensity_iff]
intro n hn
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
have : (Icc 0 ((n - 1) / m)).image (· * m + 1) ⊆ {x ∈ Ioc 0 n | x % m = 1} := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_image, forall_exists_index, mem_filter, mem_Ioc, mem_Icc, and_imp]
rintro _ y _ hy' rfl
have hm : 2 ≤ m := hm.lt_of_le' hm'
simp only [Nat.mul_add_mod', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hm, add_pos_iff, or_true, and_true, true_and,
← Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le hn, zero_lt_one]
exact Nat.mul_le_of_le_div _ _ _ hy'
rw [le_div_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
apply (Nat.cast_le.2 (card_le_card this)).trans'
rw [card_image_of_injective, Nat.card_Icc, Nat.sub_zero, div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hm'),
← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_one_mul (α := ℕ)]
· have := @Nat.lt_div_mul_add n.pred m hm'
rwa [← Nat.succ_le, Nat.succ_pred hn.ne'] at this
intro a b
simp [hm'.ne']
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Schnirelmann.lean | 215 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Primitive Element Theorem
In this file we prove the primitive element theorem.
## Main results
- `Field.exists_primitive_element`: a finite separable extension `E / F` has a primitive element,
i.e. there is an `α : E` such that `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`.
- `Field.exists_primitive_element_iff_finite_intermediateField`: a finite extension `E / F` has a
primitive element if and only if there exist only finitely many intermediate fields between `E`
and `F`.
## Implementation notes
In declaration names, `primitive_element` abbreviates `adjoin_simple_eq_top`:
it stands for the statement `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`. We did not add an extra
declaration `IsPrimitiveElement F α := F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)` because this
requires more unfolding without much obvious benefit.
## Tags
primitive element, separable field extension, separable extension, intermediate field, adjoin,
exists_adjoin_simple_eq_top
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
section PrimitiveElementFinite
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] (E : Type*) [Field E] [Algebra F E]
/-! ### Primitive element theorem for finite fields -/
/-- **Primitive element theorem** assuming E is finite. -/
@[stacks 09HY "second part"]
theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_top [Finite E] : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨α, hα⟩ := @IsCyclic.exists_generator Eˣ _ _
use α
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [hx]
exact F⟮α.val⟯.zero_mem
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp (hα (Units.mk0 x hx))
rw [show x = α ^ n by norm_cast; rw [hn, Units.val_mk0]]
exact zpow_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F (E := E) ↑α) n
/-- Primitive element theorem for finite dimensional extension of a finite field. -/
theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_bot [Finite F] [FiniteDimensional F E] :
∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ :=
haveI : Finite E := Module.finite_of_finite F
exists_primitive_element_of_finite_top F E
end PrimitiveElementFinite
/-! ### Primitive element theorem for infinite fields -/
section PrimitiveElementInf
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] [Infinite F] {E : Type*} [Field E] (ϕ : F →+* E) (α β : E)
theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (f g : F[X]) :
∃ c : F, ∀ α' ∈ (f.map ϕ).roots, ∀ β' ∈ (g.map ϕ).roots, -(α' - α) / (β' - β) ≠ ϕ c := by
classical
let sf := (f.map ϕ).roots
let sg := (g.map ϕ).roots
classical
let s := (sf.bind fun α' => sg.map fun β' => -(α' - α) / (β' - β)).toFinset
let s' := s.preimage ϕ fun x _ y _ h => ϕ.injective h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset s'
simp_rw [s', s, Finset.mem_preimage, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mem_bind, Multiset.mem_map]
at hc
push_neg at hc
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
variable (F)
variable [Algebra F E]
/-- This is the heart of the proof of the primitive element theorem. It shows that if `F` is
infinite and `α` and `β` are separable over `F` then `F⟮α, β⟯` is generated by a single element. -/
theorem primitive_element_inf_aux [Algebra.IsSeparable F E] : ∃ γ : E, F⟮α, β⟯ = F⟮γ⟯ := by
classical
have hα := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral F α
have hβ := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral F β
let f := minpoly F α
let g := minpoly F β
let ιFE := algebraMap F E
let ιEE' := algebraMap E (SplittingField (g.map ιFE))
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (ιEE'.comp ιFE) (ιEE' α) (ιEE' β) f g
let γ := α + c • β
suffices β_in_Fγ : β ∈ F⟮γ⟯ by
use γ
apply le_antisymm
· rw [adjoin_le_iff]
have α_in_Fγ : α ∈ F⟮γ⟯ := by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right α (c • β)]
exact F⟮γ⟯.sub_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F γ) (F⟮γ⟯.toSubalgebra.smul_mem β_in_Fγ c)
rintro x (rfl | rfl) <;> assumption
· rw [adjoin_simple_le_iff]
have α_in_Fαβ : α ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert α {β})
have β_in_Fαβ : β ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert_of_mem α rfl)
exact F⟮α, β⟯.add_mem α_in_Fαβ (F⟮α, β⟯.smul_mem β_in_Fαβ)
classical
let p := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯)).comp
(C (AdjoinSimple.gen F γ) - (C ↑c : F⟮γ⟯[X]) * X)) (g.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯))
let h := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map ιFE).comp (C γ - C (ιFE c) * X)) (g.map ιFE)
have map_g_ne_zero : g.map ιFE ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero hβ)
have h_ne_zero : h ≠ 0 :=
mt EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_zero_iff.mp (not_and.mpr fun _ => map_g_ne_zero)
suffices p_linear : p.map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E) = C h.leadingCoeff * (X - C β) by
have finale : β = algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1) := by
simp [map_div₀, RingHom.map_neg, ← coeff_map, ← coeff_map, p_linear,
mul_sub, coeff_C, mul_div_cancel_left₀ β (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp h_ne_zero)]
rw [finale]
exact Subtype.mem (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1)
have h_sep : h.Separable := separable_gcd_right _ (Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F β).map
have h_root : h.eval β = 0 := by
apply eval_gcd_eq_zero
· rw [eval_comp, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_C, eval_X, eval_map, ← aeval_def, ←
Algebra.smul_def, add_sub_cancel_right, minpoly.aeval]
· rw [eval_map, ← aeval_def, minpoly.aeval]
have h_splits : Splits ιEE' h :=
splits_of_splits_gcd_right ιEE' map_g_ne_zero (SplittingField.splits _)
have h_roots : ∀ x ∈ (h.map ιEE').roots, x = ιEE' β := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_roots_map h_ne_zero] at hx
specialize hc (ιEE' γ - ιEE' (ιFE c) * x) (by
have f_root := root_left_of_root_gcd hx
rw [eval₂_comp, eval₂_sub, eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_C, eval₂_X, eval₂_map] at f_root
exact (mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hα)).mpr f_root)
specialize hc x (by
rw [mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hβ), ← eval₂_map]
exact root_right_of_root_gcd hx)
by_contra a
apply hc
apply (div_eq_iff (sub_ne_zero.mpr a)).mpr
simp only [γ, Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.comp_apply]
ring
rw [← eq_X_sub_C_of_separable_of_root_eq h_sep h_root h_splits h_roots]
trans EuclideanDomain.gcd (?_ : E[X]) (?_ : E[X])
· dsimp only [γ]
convert (gcd_map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E)).symm
· simp only [map_comp, Polynomial.map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, Polynomial.map_sub,
map_C, AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen, map_add, Polynomial.map_mul, map_X]
congr
-- If `F` is infinite and `E/F` has only finitely many intermediate fields, then for any
-- `α` and `β` in `E`, `F⟮α, β⟯` is generated by a single element.
-- Marked as private since it's a special case of
-- `exists_primitive_element_of_finite_intermediateField`.
private theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : ∃ γ : E, F⟮α, β⟯ = F⟮γ⟯ := by
let f : F → IntermediateField F E := fun x ↦ F⟮α + x • β⟯
obtain ⟨x, y, hneq, heq⟩ := Finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite f
use α + x • β
apply le_antisymm
· rw [adjoin_le_iff]
have αxβ_in_K : α + x • β ∈ F⟮α + x • β⟯ := mem_adjoin_simple_self F _
| have αyβ_in_K : α + y • β ∈ F⟮α + y • β⟯ := mem_adjoin_simple_self F _
dsimp [f] at *
simp only [← heq] at αyβ_in_K
have β_in_K := sub_mem αxβ_in_K αyβ_in_K
rw [show (α + x • β) - (α + y • β) = (x - y) • β by rw [sub_smul]; abel1] at β_in_K
replace β_in_K := smul_mem _ β_in_K (x := (x - y)⁻¹)
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_eq_div, div_self (sub_ne_zero.2 hneq), one_smul] at β_in_K
have α_in_K : α ∈ F⟮α + x • β⟯ := by
convert ← sub_mem αxβ_in_K (smul_mem _ β_in_K)
apply add_sub_cancel_right
rintro x (rfl | rfl) <;> assumption
· rw [adjoin_simple_le_iff]
have α_in_Fαβ : α ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert α {β})
have β_in_Fαβ : β ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert_of_mem α rfl)
exact F⟮α, β⟯.add_mem α_in_Fαβ (F⟮α, β⟯.smul_mem β_in_Fαβ)
end PrimitiveElementInf
variable (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E]
variable [Algebra F E]
section SeparableAssumption
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 179 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid on `M.E` which a set `B ⊆ M.E` is a base if and only if
`M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_isBase.imp (fun _ hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I' ⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
obtain rfl : I = B' \ X := hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB'.indep.diff _)
(subset_diff.2 ⟨hIB', (subset_diff.1 hI.subset).2⟩)
(diff_subset_diff_left hB'.subset_ground)
simp_rw [maximal_subset_iff']
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E, ?_, ⟨⟨inter_subset_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [subset_inter_iff, and_iff_left hI'E, subset_diff, and_iff_right hI'X]
exact Disjoint.mono_right hB'IB <| disjoint_union_right.2
⟨disjoint_sdiff_right.mono_left hI'X , hI'B⟩
· exact ⟨B', hB', (disjoint_sdiff_left (t := X)).mono_left inter_subset_left⟩
· exact inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset
simp only [subset_inter_iff, subset_diff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine fun J hJE B'' hB'' hdj hJX hXJ ↦ ⟨⟨hJX, ?_⟩, hJE⟩
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset, ← union_diff_cancel hJX,
inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, empty_union, diff_eq, ← inter_assoc,
← diff_eq, diff_subset_comm, diff_eq, inter_assoc, ← diff_eq, inter_comm]
exact subset_trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ hB''.subset_ground) hXJ
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
obtain rfl : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩ ?_
exact hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he (subset_union_right.trans hI'B₁))
by_contra hdj'
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hdj'
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues.) -/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.IsBase B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_isBase_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rw [isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase, isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff,
maximal_subset_iff]
simp [dual_indep_iff_exists', hB]
theorem dual_isBase_iff' : M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_isBase_iff, and_iff_left h])
(fun h ↦ iff_of_false (h ∘ (fun h' ↦ h'.subset_ground)) (h ∘ And.right))
theorem setOf_dual_isBase_eq : {B | M✶.IsBase B} = (fun X ↦ M.E \ X) '' {B | M.IsBase B} := by
ext B
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, dual_isBase_iff']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, h.1, diff_diff_cancel_left h.2⟩,
fun ⟨B', hB', h⟩ ↦ ⟨?_,h.symm.trans_subset diff_subset⟩⟩
rwa [← h, diff_diff_cancel_left hB'.subset_ground]
@[simp] theorem dual_dual (M : Matroid α) : M✶✶ = M :=
ext_isBase rfl (fun B (h : B ⊆ M.E) ↦
by rw [dual_isBase_iff, dual_isBase_iff, dual_ground, diff_diff_cancel_left h])
|
theorem dual_involutive : Function.Involutive (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) := dual_dual
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 158 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Products and coproducts in the category of topological spaces
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits Set TopologicalSpace Topology
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
/-- The projection from the product as a bundled continuous map. -/
abbrev piπ {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) ⟶ α i :=
ofHom ⟨fun f => f i, continuous_apply i⟩
/-- The explicit fan of a family of topological spaces given by the pi type. -/
@[simps! pt π_app]
def piFan {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : Fan α :=
Fan.mk (TopCat.of (∀ i, α i)) (piπ.{v,u} α)
/-- The constructed fan is indeed a limit -/
def piFanIsLimit {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : IsLimit (piFan α) where
lift S := ofHom
{ toFun := fun s i => S.π.app ⟨i⟩ s
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi (fun i => (S.π.app ⟨i⟩).hom.2) }
uniq := by
intro S m h
ext x
funext i
simp [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ← h ⟨i⟩]
fac _ _ := rfl
/-- The product is homeomorphic to the product of the underlying spaces,
equipped with the product topology.
-/
def piIsoPi {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : ∏ᶜ α ≅ TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (piFanIsLimit.{v, u} α)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) :
(piIsoPi α).inv ≫ Pi.π α i = piπ α i := by simp [piIsoPi]
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
(Pi.π α i :) ((piIsoPi α).inv x) = x i :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (piIsoPi_inv_π α i) x
theorem piIsoPi_hom_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι)
(x : (∏ᶜ α : TopCat.{max v u})) : (piIsoPi α).hom x i = (Pi.π α i :) x := by
have := piIsoPi_inv_π α i
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq] at this
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom this x
/-- The inclusion to the coproduct as a bundled continuous map. -/
abbrev sigmaι {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : α i ⟶ TopCat.of (Σi, α i) := by
| refine ofHom (ContinuousMap.mk ?_ ?_)
· dsimp
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Products.lean | 71 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,484 | 1,488 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogBounds
/-!
# Complex arctangent
This file defines the complex arctangent `Complex.arctan` as
$$\arctan z = -\frac i2 \log \frac{1 + zi}{1 - zi}$$
and shows that it extends `Real.arctan` to the complex plane. Its Taylor series expansion
$$\arctan z = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n + 1} z^{2n + 1},\ |z|<1$$
is proved in `Complex.hasSum_arctan`.
-/
namespace Complex
open scoped Real
/-- The complex arctangent, defined via the complex logarithm. -/
noncomputable def arctan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := -I / 2 * log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I))
theorem tan_arctan {z : ℂ} (h₁ : z ≠ I) (h₂ : z ≠ -I) : tan (arctan z) = z := by
unfold tan sin cos
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
-- multiply top and bottom by `exp (arctan z * I)`
← mul_div_mul_right _ _ (exp_ne_zero (arctan z * I)), sub_mul, add_mul,
← exp_add, neg_mul, neg_add_cancel, exp_zero, ← exp_add, ← two_mul]
have z₁ : 1 + z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₁
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg] at h₁
exact h₁.symm
have z₂ : 1 - z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₂
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, one_mul] at h₂
exact h₂.symm
have key : exp (2 * (arctan z * I)) = (1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I) := by
rw [arctan, ← mul_rotate, ← mul_assoc,
show 2 * (I * (-I / 2)) = 1 by field_simp, one_mul, exp_log]
· exact div_ne_zero z₁ z₂
-- multiply top and bottom by `1 - z * I`
rw [key, ← mul_div_mul_right _ _ z₂, sub_mul, add_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ z₂, one_mul,
show _ / _ * I = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
/-- `cos z` is nonzero when the bounds in `arctan_tan` are met (`z` lies in the vertical strip
`-π / 2 < z.re < π / 2` and `z ≠ π / 2`). -/
lemma cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re)
(h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) : cos z ≠ 0 := by
refine cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun k ↦ ?_)
rw [ne_eq, Complex.ext_iff, not_and_or] at h₀ ⊢
norm_cast at h₀ ⊢
rcases h₀ with nr | ni
· left; contrapose! nr
rw [nr, mul_div_assoc, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₁
rw [nr, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₂
norm_cast at h₁ h₂
change -1 < _ at h₁
rwa [show 2 * k + 1 = 1 by omega, Int.cast_one, one_mul] at nr
· exact Or.inr ni
theorem arctan_tan {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re) (h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) :
arctan (tan z) = z := by
have h := cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds h₀ h₁ h₂
unfold arctan tan
-- multiply top and bottom by `cos z`
rw [← mul_div_mul_right (1 + _) _ h, add_mul, sub_mul, one_mul, ← mul_rotate, mul_div_cancel₀ _ h]
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, 1, 2]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← sin_neg, ← cos_neg]
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I, ← exp_sub, show z * I - -z * I = 2 * (I * z) by ring, log_exp,
show -I / 2 * (2 * (I * z)) = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
all_goals norm_num
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' two_pos, neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' two_pos]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_arctan (x : ℝ) : (Real.arctan x : ℂ) = arctan x := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Real.tan_arctan x]
rw [ofReal_tan, arctan_tan]
all_goals norm_cast
· rw [← ne_eq]; exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).ne
· exact Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan _
· exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).le
| /-- The argument of `1 + z` for `z` in the open unit disc is always in `(-π / 2, π / 2)`. -/
lemma arg_one_add_mem_Ioo {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) : (1 + z).arg ∈ Set.Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [Set.mem_Ioo, ← abs_lt, abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, add_re, one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add']
exact Or.inl (abs_lt.mp ((abs_re_le_norm z).trans_lt hz)).1
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arctan.lean | 88 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Utensil Song
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Isometry
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
/-!
# Clifford Algebras
We construct the Clifford algebra of a module `M` over a commutative ring `R`, equipped with
a quadratic form `Q`.
## Notation
The Clifford algebra of the `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic form `Q` is
an `R`-algebra denoted `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
Given a linear morphism `f : M → A` from a module `M` to another `R`-algebra `A`, such that
`cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)`, there is a (unique) lift of `f` to an `R`-algebra
morphism from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A`, which is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.lift Q f cond`.
The canonical linear map `M → CliffordAlgebra Q` is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.ι Q`.
## Theorems
The main theorems proved ensure that `CliffordAlgebra Q` satisfies the universal property
of the Clifford algebra.
1. `ι_comp_lift` is the fact that the composition of `ι Q` with `lift Q f cond` agrees with `f`.
2. `lift_unique` ensures the uniqueness of `lift Q f cond` with respect to 1.
## Implementation details
The Clifford algebra of `M` is constructed as a quotient of the tensor algebra, as follows.
1. We define a relation `CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q` on `TensorAlgebra R M`.
This is the smallest relation which identifies squares of elements of `M` with `Q m`.
2. The Clifford algebra is the quotient of the tensor algebra by this relation.
This file is almost identical to `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/ExteriorAlgebra/Basic.lean`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
open TensorAlgebra
/-- `Rel` relates each `ι m * ι m`, for `m : M`, with `Q m`.
The Clifford algebra of `M` is defined as the quotient modulo this relation.
-/
inductive Rel : TensorAlgebra R M → TensorAlgebra R M → Prop
| of (m : M) : Rel (ι R m * ι R m) (algebraMap R _ (Q m))
end CliffordAlgebra
/-- The Clifford algebra of an `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic_form `Q`.
-/
def CliffordAlgebra :=
RingQuot (CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
-- The `Inhabited, Semiring, Algebra` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instInhabited _
instance instRing : Ring (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instRing _
instance (priority := 900) instAlgebra' {R A M} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Module R M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] :
Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instAlgebra _
-- verify there are no diamonds
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Ring.toIntAlgebra _ : Algebra ℤ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- shortcut instance, as the other instance is slow
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := instAlgebra' _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] :
SMulCommClass R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instSMulCommClass _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[SMul R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] [IsScalarTower R S A] (Q : QuadraticForm A M) :
IsScalarTower R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instIsScalarTower _
/-- The canonical linear map `M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q`.
-/
def ι : M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(RingQuot.mkAlgHom R _).toLinearMap.comp (TensorAlgebra.ι R)
/-- As well as being linear, `ι Q` squares to the quadratic form -/
@[simp]
theorem ι_sq_scalar (m : M) : ι Q m * ι Q m = algebraMap R _ (Q m) := by
rw [ι]
erw [LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, ← map_mul (RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel Q)),
RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel R (Rel.of m), AlgHom.commutes]
rfl
variable {Q} {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[simp]
theorem comp_ι_sq_scalar (g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) (m : M) :
g (ι Q m) * g (ι Q m) = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) := by
rw [← map_mul, ι_sq_scalar, AlgHom.commutes]
variable (Q) in
/-- Given a linear map `f : M →ₗ[R] A` into an `R`-algebra `A`, which satisfies the condition:
`cond : ∀ m : M, f m * f m = Q(m)`, this is the canonical lift of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras
from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A`.
-/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift :
{ f : M →ₗ[R] A // ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) } ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) where
toFun f :=
RingQuot.liftAlgHom R
⟨TensorAlgebra.lift R (f : M →ₗ[R] A), fun x y (h : Rel Q x y) => by
induction h
rw [AlgHom.commutes, map_mul, TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, f.prop]⟩
invFun F :=
⟨F.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q), fun m => by
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, comp_ι_sq_scalar]⟩
left_inv f := by
ext x
exact (RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ x)
right_inv F :=
RingQuot.ringQuot_ext' _ _ _ <|
TensorAlgebra.hom_ext <|
LinearMap.ext fun x ↦
(RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)) :
(lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩).toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = f :=
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mp <| (lift Q).symm_apply_apply ⟨f, cond⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)) (x) :
lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩ (ι Q x) = f x :=
(LinearMap.ext_iff.mp <| ι_comp_lift f cond) x
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m : M, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m))
(g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) : g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = f ↔ g = lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩ := by
convert (lift Q : _ ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A)).symm_apply_eq
rw [lift_symm_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι (g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) :
lift Q ⟨g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q), comp_ι_sq_scalar _⟩ = g := by
exact (lift Q : _ ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A)).apply_symm_apply g
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A} :
f.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) → f = g := by
intro h
apply (lift Q).symm.injective
rw [lift_symm_apply, lift_symm_apply]
simp only [h]
-- This proof closely follows `TensorAlgebra.induction`
/-- If `C` holds for the `algebraMap` of `r : R` into `CliffordAlgebra Q`, the `ι` of `x : M`,
and is preserved under addition and multiplication, then it holds for all of `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
| See also the stronger `CliffordAlgebra.left_induction` and `CliffordAlgebra.right_induction`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction {C : CliffordAlgebra Q → Prop}
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Basic.lean | 183 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableSequence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
/-!
# Borel sigma algebras on spaces with orders
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx` (where Ixx is one of {Iio, Ioi, Iic, Ici, Ico, Ioc}):
The Borel sigma algebra of a linear order topology is generated by intervals of the given kind.
* `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem`, `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem`:
The Borel sigma algebra of a dense linear order topology is generated by intervals of a given
kind, with endpoints from dense subsets.
* `ext_of_Ico`, `ext_of_Ioc`:
A locally finite Borel measure on a second countable conditionally complete linear order is
characterized by the measures of intervals of the given kind.
* `ext_of_Iic`, `ext_of_Ici`:
A finite Borel measure on a second countable linear order is characterized by the measures of
intervals of the given kind.
* `UpperSemicontinuous.measurable`, `LowerSemicontinuous.measurable`:
Semicontinuous functions are measurable.
* `Measurable.iSup`, `Measurable.iInf`, `Measurable.sSup`, `Measurable.sInf`:
Countable supremums and infimums of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
* `Measurable.liminf`, `Measurable.limsup`:
Countable liminfs and limsups of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section OrderTopology
variable (α)
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio : borel α = .generateFrom (range Iio) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le ?_)
· rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_of_subbasis (@OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _)]
letI : MeasurableSpace α := MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iio)
have H : ∀ a : α, MeasurableSet (Iio a) := fun a => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases em (∃ b, a ⋖ b) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hcovBy
· rw [hb.Ioi_eq, ← compl_Iio]
exact (H _).compl
· rcases isOpen_biUnion_countable (Ioi a) Ioi fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_Ioi with ⟨t, hat, htc, htU⟩
have : Ioi a = ⋃ b ∈ t, Ici b := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ <| iUnion₂_subset fun b hb ↦ Ici_subset_Ioi.2 (hat hb)
refine Subset.trans ?_ <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self
simpa [CovBy, htU, subset_def] using hcovBy
simp only [this, ← compl_Iio]
exact .biUnion htc <| fun _ _ ↦ (H _).compl
· apply H
· rw [forall_mem_range]
intro a
exact GenerateMeasurable.basic _ isOpen_Iio
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi : borel α = .generateFrom (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio αᵒᵈ _ (by infer_instance : SecondCountableTopology α) _ _
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic :
borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iic) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Ioi]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici : borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Ici) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end OrderTopology
section Orders
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable {mδ : MeasurableSpace δ}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a) :=
isClosed_Ici.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ici : NullMeasurableSet (Ici a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ici.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a) :=
isClosed_Iic.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iic : NullMeasurableSet (Iic a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iic.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Icc a b) :=
isClosed_Icc.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Icc : NullMeasurableSet (Icc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Icc.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ici b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ici.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iic b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iic.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[Icc a b] x) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, nhdsWithin_inter]
infer_instance
instance atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atTop : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atBot : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance [R1Space α] : IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α) where
exists_measurable_subset := by
intro _ hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := mem_cocompact.mp hs
exact ⟨(closure t)ᶜ, ht.closure.compl_mem_cocompact, isClosed_closure.measurableSet.compl,
(compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure).trans hts⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {a b : α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le' : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_le'
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
-- we open this locale only here to avoid issues with list being treated as intervals above
open Interval
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iio : MeasurableSet (Iio a) :=
isOpen_Iio.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iio : NullMeasurableSet (Iio a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iio.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi a) :=
isOpen_Ioi.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioi : NullMeasurableSet (Ioi a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo a b) :=
isOpen_Ioo.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioo : NullMeasurableSet (Ioo a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioo.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioi.inter measurableSet_Iic
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioc : NullMeasurableSet (Ioc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ico : MeasurableSet (Ico a b) :=
measurableSet_Ici.inter measurableSet_Iio
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ico : NullMeasurableSet (Ico a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ico.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ioi b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iio b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iio.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[[[a, b]]] x) :=
nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
(isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ} {f g : δ → α}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : NullMeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure (α × α)} :
NullMeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } μ :=
measurableSet_lt'.nullMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_le [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ}
{f g : δ → α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_le'
theorem Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet (h : OrdConnected s) : MeasurableSet s := by
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y
have huopen : IsOpen u := isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_Ioo
have humeas : MeasurableSet u := huopen.measurableSet
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo
have : u ⊆ s := iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => iUnion₂_subset fun y hy =>
Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy)
rw [← union_diff_cancel this]
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurableSet
theorem IsPreconnected.measurableSet (h : IsPreconnected s) : MeasurableSet s :=
h.ordConnected.measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderClosedTopology α] (s t : Set α) :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ t, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
≤ borel α := by
apply generateFrom_le
borelize α
rintro _ ⟨a, -, b, -, -, rfl⟩
exact measurableSet_Ico
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → y ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
set S : Set (Set α) := { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel _ _)
letI : MeasurableSpace α := generateFrom S
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine generateFrom_le (forall_mem_range.2 fun a => ?_)
rcases hd.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top with ⟨t, hts, hc, htd, htb, -⟩
by_cases ha : ∀ b < a, (Ioo b a).Nonempty
· convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (u ∈ t) (_ : l < u) (_ : u ≤ a), Ico l u)
· ext y
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Ico]
constructor
· intro hy
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) y with ⟨l, hlt, hly⟩
rcases htd.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioo (ha y hy) with ⟨u, hut, hyu, hua⟩
exact ⟨l, hlt, u, hut, hly.trans_lt hyu, hua.le, hly, hyu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, -, u, -, -, hua, -, hyu⟩
exact hyu.trans_le hua
· refine MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun a ha => MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun b hb => ?_
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hab => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨a, hts ha, b, hts hb, hab, mem_singleton _⟩
· simp only [not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at ha
replace ha : a ∈ s := hIoo ha.choose a ha.choose_spec.fst ha.choose_spec.snd
convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (_ : l < a), Ico l a)
· symm
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, inter_eq_right, subset_def, mem_iUnion,
mem_Ici, mem_Iio]
intro x hx
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) x with ⟨z, hzt, hzx⟩
exact ⟨z, hzt, hzx.trans_lt hx, hzx⟩
· refine .biUnion hc fun x hx => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hlt => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨x, hts hx, a, ha, hlt, mem_singleton _⟩
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (by simp) fun _ _ hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
| theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ (l u : α), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Order.lean | 305 | 310 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.Grade
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
/-!
# Finsets and multisets form a graded order
This file characterises atoms, coatoms and the covering relation in finsets and multisets. It also
proves that they form a `ℕ`-graded order.
## Main declarations
* `Multiset.instGradeMinOrder_nat`: Multisets are `ℕ`-graded
* `Finset.instGradeMinOrder_nat`: Finsets are `ℕ`-graded
-/
open Order
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
variable {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma covBy_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ⋖ a ::ₘ s :=
⟨lt_cons_self _ _, fun t hst hts ↦ (covBy_succ _).2 (card_lt_card hst) <| by
simpa using card_lt_card hts⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_multiset_cons (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a, a ::ₘ s = t :=
(lt_iff_cons_le.1 h.lt).imp fun _a ha ↦ ha.eq_of_not_lt <| h.2 <| lt_cons_self _ _
lemma covBy_iff : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a, a ::ₘ s = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_multiset_cons, by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact covBy_cons _ _⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.card_multiset (h : s ⋖ t) : card s ⋖ card t := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := h.exists_multiset_cons; rw [card_cons]; exact covBy_succ _
lemma isAtom_iff : IsAtom s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by simp [← bot_covBy_iff, covBy_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma isAtom_singleton (a : α) : IsAtom ({a} : Multiset α) := isAtom_iff.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
instance instGradeMinOrder : GradeMinOrder ℕ (Multiset α) where
grade := card
grade_strictMono := card_strictMono
covBy_grade _ _ := CovBy.card_multiset
isMin_grade s hs := by rw [isMin_iff_eq_bot.1 hs]; exact isMin_bot
@[simp] lemma grade_eq (m : Multiset α) : grade ℕ m = card m := rfl
end Multiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
/-- Finsets form an order-connected suborder of multisets. -/
lemma ordConnected_range_val : Set.OrdConnected (Set.range val : Set <| Multiset α) :=
⟨by rintro _ _ _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ t ht; exact ⟨⟨t, Multiset.nodup_of_le ht.2 s.2⟩, rfl⟩⟩
/-- Finsets form an order-connected suborder of sets. -/
lemma ordConnected_range_coe : Set.OrdConnected (Set.range ((↑) : Finset α → Set α)) :=
⟨by rintro _ _ _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ t ht; exact ⟨_, (s.finite_toSet.subset ht.2).coe_toFinset⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma val_wcovBy_val : s.1 ⩿ t.1 ↔ s ⩿ t :=
ordConnected_range_val.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ⟨⟨_, val_injective⟩, val_le_iff⟩
@[simp] lemma val_covBy_val : s.1 ⋖ t.1 ↔ s ⋖ t :=
ordConnected_range_val.apply_covBy_apply_iff ⟨⟨_, val_injective⟩, val_le_iff⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_wcovBy_coe : (s : Set α) ⩿ t ↔ s ⩿ t :=
ordConnected_range_coe.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ⟨⟨_, coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_covBy_coe : (s : Set α) ⋖ t ↔ s ⋖ t :=
ordConnected_range_coe.apply_covBy_apply_iff ⟨⟨_, coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.WCovBy.finset_val⟩ := val_wcovBy_val
alias ⟨_, _root_.CovBy.finset_val⟩ := val_covBy_val
alias ⟨_, _root_.WCovBy.finset_coe⟩ := coe_wcovBy_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.CovBy.finset_coe⟩ := coe_covBy_coe
@[simp] lemma covBy_cons (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ s.cons a ha := by simp [← val_covBy_val]
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_finset_cons (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a, ∃ ha : a ∉ s, s.cons a ha = t :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssuperset <| h.2 <| ssubset_cons _).symm⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_cons : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a, ∃ ha : a ∉ s, s.cons a ha = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_finset_cons, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact covBy_cons _⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.card_finset (h : s ⋖ t) : s.card ⋖ t.card := (val_covBy_val.2 h).card_multiset
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] lemma wcovBy_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s ⩿ insert a s := by simp [← coe_wcovBy_coe]
@[simp] lemma erase_wcovBy (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⩿ s := by simp [← coe_wcovBy_coe]
lemma covBy_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ insert a s :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).covBy_of_lt <| ssubset_insert ha
@[simp] lemma erase_covBy (ha : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⋖ s := ⟨erase_ssubset ha, (erase_wcovBy _ _).2⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_finset_insert (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t := by
simpa using h.exists_finset_cons
| lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_finset_erase (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∈ t, t.erase a = s := by
simpa only [← coe_inj, coe_erase] using h.finset_coe.exists_set_sdiff_singleton
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Grade.lean | 110 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
| ### recursion and induction principles
-/
end Rec
open scoped Relator in
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,359 | 1,365 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = #{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} = {i ∈ Icc 1 b | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
∏ p ∈ range m with p.Prime, p ^ padicValNat p n = n := by
nth_rw 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
obtain ⟨hp1, hp2⟩ := Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
/-! ### Lemmas about factorizations of particular functions -/
-- TODO: Port lemmas from `Data/Nat/Multiplicity` to here, re-written in terms of `factorization`
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `[1, n]` are multiples of `p`.
See `Nat.card_multiples'` for an alternative spelling of the statement. -/
theorem card_multiples (n p : ℕ) : #{e ∈ range n | p ∣ e + 1} = n / p := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, Finset.range_succ, filter_insert, apply_ite card,
card_insert_of_not_mem, hn]
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `(0, n]` are multiples of `p`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card_eq_div (n p : ℕ) : #{x ∈ Ioc 0 n | p ∣ x} = n / p := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
-- TODO: Golf away `h1` after Yaël PRs a lemma asserting this
have h1 : Ioc 0 n.succ = insert n.succ (Ioc 0 n) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
simp_rw [← Ico_succ_succ, Ico_insert_right (succ_le_succ hn.le), Ico_succ_right]
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, h1, filter_insert, apply_ite card, card_insert_eq_ite, IH,
Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ioc, not_le.2 (lt_add_one n)]
/-- There are exactly `⌊N/n⌋` positive multiples of `n` that are `≤ N`.
See `Nat.card_multiples` for a "shifted-by-one" version. -/
lemma card_multiples' (N n : ℕ) : #{k ∈ range N.succ | k ≠ 0 ∧ n ∣ k} = N / n := by
induction N with
| zero => simp [Finset.filter_false_of_mem]
| succ N ih =>
rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
by_cases h : n ∣ N.succ
· simp [h, succ_div_of_dvd, ih]
· simp [h, succ_div_of_not_dvd, ih]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 912 | 927 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
| · obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 257 | 267 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (monomial 0) add fun n a _h =>
by rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; exact monomial _ _
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem support_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.erase n) = (support p).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [support, erase_def, Finsupp.support_erase]
theorem monomial_add_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : monomial n (coeff p n) + p.erase n = p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_erase, coeff]
exact Finsupp.single_add_erase _ _
theorem coeff_erase (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) :
(p.erase n).coeff i = if i = n then 0 else p.coeff i := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def, coeff]
exact ite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem erase_zero (n : ℕ) : (0 : R[X]).erase n = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_monomial {n : ℕ} {a : R} : erase n (monomial n a) = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.erase n) n = 0 := by simp [coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem erase_ne (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) (h : i ≠ n) : coeff (p.erase n) i = coeff p i := by
simp [coeff_erase, h]
section Update
/-- Replace the coefficient of a `p : R[X]` at a given degree `n : ℕ`
by a given value `a : R`. If `a = 0`, this is equal to `p.erase n`
If `p.natDegree < n` and `a ≠ 0`, this increases the degree to `n`. -/
def update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.ofFinsupp (p.toFinsupp.update n a)
theorem coeff_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(p.update n a).coeff = Function.update p.coeff n a := by
ext
cases p
simp only [coeff, update, Function.update_apply, coe_update]
theorem coeff_update_apply (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) (i : ℕ) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = if i = n then a else p.coeff i := by
rw [coeff_update, Function.update_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_update_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (p.update n a).coeff n = a := by
rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_update_ne (p : R[X]) {n : ℕ} (a : R) {i : ℕ} (h : i ≠ n) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = p.coeff i := by rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem update_zero_eq_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : p.update n 0 = p.erase n := by
ext
rw [coeff_update_apply, coeff_erase]
theorem support_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) [Decidable (a = 0)] :
support (p.update n a) = if a = 0 then p.support.erase n else insert n p.support := by
classical
cases p
simp only [support, update, Finsupp.support_update]
congr
theorem support_update_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.update n 0) = p.support.erase n := by
rw [update_zero_eq_erase, support_erase]
theorem support_update_ne_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
support (p.update n a) = insert n p.support := by classical rw [support_update, if_neg ha]
end Update
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : R[X]) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image (fun n => p.coeff n) p.support
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : R[X]) = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem mem_coeffs_iff {p : R[X]} {c : R} : c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
theorem coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : R[X]) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
simp_rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
theorem coeff_mem_coeffs (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.coeff n ∈ p.coeffs := by
classical
simp only [coeffs, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_image, Ne]
exact ⟨n, h, rfl⟩
theorem coeffs_monomial (n : ℕ) {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (monomial n c).coeffs = {c} := by
rw [coeffs, support_monomial n hc]
simp
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% { Function.Injective.commSemigroup toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_mul with
toSemiring := Polynomial.semiring }
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
instance instZSMul : SMul ℤ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zsmul (a : ℤ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zsmul (a : ℤ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
instance instIntCast : IntCast R[X] where intCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : R[X]) = z := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : R[X]).toFinsupp = z := rfl
instance ring : Ring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.ring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective (toFinsupp_zero (R := R))
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add
toFinsupp_mul toFinsupp_neg toFinsupp_sub (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _)
(fun _ _ => toFinsupp_zsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,099 | 1,099 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_toList : x ∈ s.toList ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [RelSeries.toList, List.mem_ofFn', RelSeries.mem_def]
theorem subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero (hs : s.length = 0) : {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩
congr!
exact finCongr (by rw [hs, zero_add]) |>.injective <| Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _
theorem length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : s.length ≠ 0 :=
fun hs ↦ h.not_subsingleton <| subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs
theorem length_pos_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial h
theorem length_ne_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length ≠ 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨s 0, by simp [mem_def], s 1, by simp [mem_def], fun rid ↦ irrefl (s 0) ?_⟩,
length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial⟩
nth_rw 2 [rid]
convert s.step ⟨0, by omega⟩
ext
simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem length_pos (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : 0 < s.length ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| length_ne_zero irrefl
lemma length_eq_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length = 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_ne_iff, length_ne_zero irrefl, Set.not_nontrivial_iff]
/-- Start of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its head is `a₀`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def head (x : RelSeries r) : α := x 0
/-- End of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its last element is `aₙ`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def last (x : RelSeries r) : α := x <| Fin.last _
lemma apply_last (x : RelSeries r) : x (Fin.last <| x.length) = x.last := rfl
lemma head_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.head ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
lemma last_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.last ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma head_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).head = x := by simp [singleton, head]
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).last = x := by simp [singleton, last]
end
variable {r s}
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and `b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ` are two strict series
such that `r aₙ b₀`, then there is a chain of length `n + m + 1` given by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ`.
-/
@[simps length]
def append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length + 1
toFun := Fin.append p q ∘ Fin.cast (by omega)
step i := by
obtain hi | rfl | hi :=
lt_trichotomy i (Fin.castLE (by omega) (Fin.last _ : Fin (p.length + 1)))
· convert p.step ⟨i.1, hi⟩ <;> convert Fin.append_left p q _ <;> rfl
· convert connect
· convert Fin.append_left p q _
· convert Fin.append_right p q _; rfl
· set x := _; set y := _
change r (Fin.append p q x) (Fin.append p q y)
have hx : x = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <|
i.2.trans <| by omega⟩ := by
ext; dsimp [x, y]; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel']; exact hi
have hy : y = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - p.length, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (le_of_lt hi)
(by exact i.2)⟩ := by
ext
dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm p.length 1, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel' <| le_of_lt (show p.length < i.1 from hi), add_comm]
rfl
rw [hx, Fin.append_right, hy, Fin.append_right]
convert q.step ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <| by omega⟩
rw [Fin.succ_mk, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_of_lt hi : p.length ≤ i),
Nat.add_assoc _ 1, add_comm 1, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
exact hi
lemma append_apply_left (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect ((i.castAdd (q.length + 1)).cast (by dsimp; omega)) = p i := by
delta append
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_left _ _ _
lemma append_apply_right (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (q.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect (i.natAdd p.length + 1) = q i := by
delta append
simp only [Fin.coe_natAdd, Nat.cast_add, Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_right _ _ _
ext
simp only [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_natAdd]
conv_rhs => rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, ← add_assoc]
change _ % _ = _
simp only [Nat.add_mod_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_succ_eq_iff_lt]
omega
@[simp] lemma head_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).head = p.head :=
append_apply_left p q connect 0
@[simp] lemma last_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).last = q.last := by
delta last
convert append_apply_right p q connect (Fin.last _)
ext
change _ = _ % _
simp only [append_length, Fin.val_last, Fin.natAdd_last, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod,
Nat.mod_succ]
/--
For two types `α, β` and relation on them `r, s`, if `f : α → β` preserves relation `r`, then an
`r`-series can be pushed out to an `s`-series by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ ↦ f a₀ -s→ f a₁ -s→ ... -s→ f aₙ`
-/
@[simps length]
def map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : RelSeries s where
length := p.length
toFun := f.1.comp p
step := (f.2 <| p.step ·)
@[simp] lemma map_apply (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.map f i = f (p i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma head_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).head = f p.head := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).last = f p.last := rfl
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` is an `r`-series and `a` is such that
`aᵢ -r→ a -r→ a_ᵢ₊₁`, then
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aᵢ -r→ a -r→ aᵢ₊₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`
is another `r`-series
-/
@[simps]
def insertNth (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin p.length) (a : α)
(prev_connect : r (p (Fin.castSucc i)) a) (connect_next : r a (p i.succ)) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + 1
toFun := (Fin.castSucc i.succ).insertNth a p
step m := by
set x := _; set y := _; change r x y
obtain hm | hm | hm := lt_trichotomy m.1 i.1
· convert p.step ⟨m, hm.trans i.2⟩
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· change m.1 + 1 < i.1 + 1; rwa [add_lt_add_iff_right]
simp; rfl
· rw [show x = p m from show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _ by
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· show m.1 < i.1 + 1; exact hm ▸ lt_add_one _
simp]
convert prev_connect
· ext; exact hm
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.succ = i.succ.castSucc by ext; change _ + 1 = _ + 1; rw [hm],
Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
obtain hm | hm := hm
· convert p.step ⟨m.1 - 1, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add (by omega) m.2⟩
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above (h := hm)]
aesop
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp only [Fin.val_succ, Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant, Fin.succ_mk]
congr
exact Fin.ext <| Eq.symm <| Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) hm)
· convert connect_next
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.castSucc = i.succ.castSucc from Fin.ext hm.symm, Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· change i.1 + 1 < m.1 + 1; omega
simp only [Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant]
congr; ext; exact hm.symm
/--
A relation series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` of `r` gives a relation series of the reverse of `r`
by reversing the series `aₙ ←r- aₙ₋₁ ←r- ... ←r- a₁ ←r- a₀`.
-/
@[simps length]
def reverse (p : RelSeries r) : RelSeries (fun (a b : α) ↦ r b a) where
length := p.length
toFun := p ∘ Fin.rev
step i := by
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have hi : i.1 + 1 ≤ p.length := by omega
convert p.step ⟨p.length - (i.1 + 1), Nat.sub_lt_self (by omega) hi⟩
· ext; simp
· ext
simp only [Fin.val_rev, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ]
omega
@[simp] lemma reverse_apply (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.reverse i = p i.rev := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.last = p.head := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma head_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.head = p.last := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse {r : Rel α α} (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
ext <;> simp
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `a₀ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a -r→ a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) : RelSeries r :=
(singleton r newHead).append p rel
@[simp] lemma head_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).head = newHead := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).last = p.last := by
delta cons
rw [last_append]
lemma cons_cast_succ (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r a s.head) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.cons a h) (.cast (by simp) (.succ i)) = s i := by
dsimp [cons]
convert append_apply_right (singleton r a) s h i
ext
show i.1 + 1 = _ % _
simpa using (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by simp)).symm
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `aₙ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ a`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) : RelSeries r :=
p.append (singleton r newLast) rel
@[simp] lemma head_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).head = p.head := by
delta snoc; rw [head_append]
@[simp] lemma last_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).last = newLast := last_append _ _ _
| lemma snoc_cast_castSucc (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r s.last a) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.snoc a h) (.cast (by simp) (.castSucc i)) = s i :=
append_apply_left s (singleton r a) h i
-- This lemma is useful because `last_snoc` is about `Fin.last (p.snoc _ _).length`, but we often
-- see `Fin.last (p.length + 1)` in practice. They are equal by definition, but sometimes simplifier
-- does not pick up `last_snoc`
@[simp] lemma last_snoc' (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 449 | 456 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
/-!
# Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers are a sequence of rational numbers that frequently show up in
number theory.
## Mathematical overview
The Bernoulli numbers $(B_0, B_1, B_2, \ldots)=(1, -1/2, 1/6, 0, -1/30, \ldots)$ are
a sequence of rational numbers. They show up in the formula for the sums of $k$th
powers. They are related to the Taylor series expansions of $x/\tan(x)$ and
of $\coth(x)$, and also show up in the values that the Riemann Zeta function
takes both at both negative and positive integers (and hence in the
theory of modular forms). For example, if $1 \leq n$ then
$$\zeta(2n)=\sum_{t\geq1}t^{-2n}=(-1)^{n+1}\frac{(2\pi)^{2n}B_{2n}}{2(2n)!}.$$
This result is formalised in Lean: `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`.
The Bernoulli numbers can be formally defined using the power series
$$\sum B_n\frac{t^n}{n!}=\frac{t}{1-e^{-t}}$$
although that happens to not be the definition in mathlib (this is an *implementation
detail* and need not concern the mathematician).
Note that $B_1=-1/2$, meaning that we are using the $B_n^-$ of
[from Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number).
## Implementation detail
The Bernoulli numbers are defined using well-founded induction, by the formula
$$B_n=1-\sum_{k\lt n}\frac{\binom{n}{k}}{n-k+1}B_k.$$
This formula is true for all $n$ and in particular $B_0=1$. Note that this is the definition
for positive Bernoulli numbers, which we call `bernoulli'`. The negative Bernoulli numbers are
then defined as `bernoulli := (-1)^n * bernoulli'`.
## Main theorems
`sum_bernoulli : ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli k = if n = 1 then 1 else 0`
-/
open Nat Finset Finset.Nat PowerSeries
variable (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra ℚ A]
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- The Bernoulli numbers:
the $n$-th Bernoulli number $B_n$ is defined recursively via
$$B_n = 1 - \sum_{k < n} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_k}{n+1-k}$$ -/
def bernoulli' : ℕ → ℚ :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.lt_wfRel.wf fun n bernoulli' =>
1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k k.2
theorem bernoulli'_def' (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k :=
WellFounded.fix_eq _ _ _
theorem bernoulli'_def (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k ∈ range n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k := by
rw [bernoulli'_def', ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
theorem bernoulli'_spec (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose (n - k) : ℚ) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) = 1 := by
rw [sum_range_succ_comm, bernoulli'_def n, tsub_self, choose_zero_right, sub_self, zero_add,
div_one, cast_one, one_mul, sub_add, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_sub_cancel_left,
neg_eq_zero]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x hx => by rw [choose_symm (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx)), sub_self])
theorem bernoulli'_spec' (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ antidiagonal n, ((k.1 + k.2).choose k.2 : ℚ) / (k.2 + 1) * bernoulli' k.1) = 1 := by
refine ((sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk _ n).trans ?_).trans (bernoulli'_spec n)
refine sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_of_le, mem_range_succ_iff.mp hx, cast_sub]
/-! ### Examples -/
| section Examples
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_zero : bernoulli' 0 = 1 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Bernoulli.lean | 91 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
| · rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 883 | 885 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Cardinalities of finite types
This file defines the cardinality `Fintype.card α` as the number of elements in `(univ : Finset α)`.
We also include some elementary results on the values of `Fintype.card` on specific types.
## Main declarations
* `Fintype.card α`: Cardinality of a fintype. Equal to `Finset.univ.card`.
* `Finite.surjective_of_injective`: an injective function from a finite type to
itself is also surjective.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function
namespace Fintype
/-- `card α` is the number of elements in `α`, defined when `α` is a fintype. -/
def card (α) [Fintype α] : ℕ :=
(@univ α _).card
theorem subtype_card {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
@card { x // p x } (Fintype.subtype s H) = #s :=
Multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
theorem card_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
[Fintype { x // p x }] : card { x // p x } = #s := by
rw [← subtype_card s H]
congr!
@[simp]
theorem card_ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@Fintype.card p (ofFinset s H) = #s :=
Fintype.subtype_card s H
theorem card_of_finset' {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) [Fintype p] :
Fintype.card p = #s := by rw [← card_ofFinset s H]; congr!
end Fintype
namespace Fintype
theorem ofEquiv_card [Fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : @card β (ofEquiv α f) = card α :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
theorem card_congr {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (f : α ≃ β) : card α = card β := by
rw [← ofEquiv_card f]; congr!
@[congr]
theorem card_congr' {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (h : α = β) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (by rw [h])
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofSubsingleton`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use either `Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton` or
`Fintype.card_unique`. -/
theorem card_ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : @Fintype.card _ (ofSubsingleton a) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Unique α] [h : Fintype α] : Fintype.card α = 1 :=
Subsingleton.elim (ofSubsingleton default) h ▸ card_ofSubsingleton _
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofIsEmpty`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use `Fintype.card_eq_zero`. -/
theorem card_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : @Fintype.card α Fintype.ofIsEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
end Fintype
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
-- We use an arbitrary `[Fintype s]` instance here,
-- not necessarily coming from a `[Fintype α]`.
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_card {α : Type*} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinset.card = Fintype.card s :=
Multiset.card_map Subtype.val Finset.univ.val
end Set
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_univ [Fintype α] : #(univ : Finset α) = Fintype.card α := rfl
theorem Finset.eq_univ_of_card [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) (hs : #s = Fintype.card α) :
s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _) <| by rw [hs, Finset.card_univ]
theorem Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = univ :=
⟨s.eq_univ_of_card, by
rintro rfl
exact Finset.card_univ⟩
theorem Finset.card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
card_le_card (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem [Fintype α] {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hx : x ∉ s) :
#s < Fintype.card α :=
card_lt_card ⟨subset_univ s, not_forall.2 ⟨x, fun hx' => hx (hx' <| mem_univ x)⟩⟩
theorem Finset.card_lt_iff_ne_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s < Fintype.card α ↔ s ≠ Finset.univ :=
s.card_le_univ.lt_iff_ne.trans (not_congr s.card_eq_iff_eq_univ)
theorem Finset.card_compl_lt_iff_nonempty [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ < Fintype.card α ↔ s.Nonempty :=
sᶜ.card_lt_iff_ne_univ.trans s.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty
theorem Finset.card_univ_diff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#(univ \ s) = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_sdiff (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #sᶜ = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_univ_diff s
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_add_card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s + #sᶜ = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Finset.card_compl, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (card_le_univ s), Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_compl_add_card [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ + #s = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_add_card_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_compl_set [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype (↥sᶜ : Sort _)] :
Fintype.card (↥sᶜ : Sort _) = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card s := by
classical rw [← Set.toFinset_card, ← Set.toFinset_card, ← Finset.card_compl, Set.toFinset_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq (y : α) [Fintype { x // x = y }] :
Fintype.card { x // x = y } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq' (y : α) [Fintype { x // y = x }] :
Fintype.card { x // y = x } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_empty : Fintype.card Empty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_pempty : Fintype.card PEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_unit : Fintype.card Unit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_punit : Fintype.card PUnit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_bool : Fintype.card Bool = 2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_ulift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (ULift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_plift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (PLift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_orderDual (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card αᵒᵈ = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_lex (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (Lex α) = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
-- Note: The extra hypothesis `h` is there so that the rewrite lemma applies,
-- no matter what instance of `Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)` is used.
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_setUniv [Fintype α] {h : Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)} :
Fintype.card (Set.univ : Set α) = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_true [Fintype α] {h : Fintype {_a : α // True}} :
@Fintype.card {_a // True} h = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_subtype
simp
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inl` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `α` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumLeft {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) Sum.inl_injective
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inr` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `β` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumRight {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype β :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) Sum.inr_injective
theorem Finite.exists_univ_list (α) [Finite α] : ∃ l : List α, l.Nodup ∧ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨l, e⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep (@univ α _).1
have := And.intro (@univ α _).2 (@mem_univ_val α _)
exact ⟨_, by rwa [← e] at this⟩
theorem List.Nodup.length_le_card {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) :
l.length ≤ Fintype.card α := by
classical exact List.toFinset_card_of_nodup h ▸ l.toFinset.card_le_univ
namespace Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
theorem card_le_of_injective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : card α ≤ card β :=
Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn f (fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem card_le_of_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : card α ≤ card β :=
card_le_of_injective f f.2
theorem card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f) {b : β}
(w : b ∉ Set.range f) : card α < card β :=
calc
card α = (univ.map ⟨f, h⟩).card := (card_map _).symm
_ < card β :=
Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem (x := b) <| by
rwa [← mem_coe, coe_map, coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
theorem card_lt_of_injective_not_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f)
(h' : ¬Function.Surjective f) : card α < card β :=
let ⟨_y, hy⟩ := not_forall.1 h'
card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem f h hy
theorem card_le_of_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Surjective f) : card β ≤ card α :=
card_le_of_injective _ (Function.injective_surjInv h)
theorem card_range_le {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) [Fintype α] [Fintype (Set.range f)] :
Fintype.card (Set.range f) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective (fun a => ⟨f a, by simp⟩) fun ⟨_, a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, by simpa using ha⟩
theorem card_range {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [EmbeddingLike F α β] (f : F) [Fintype α]
[Fintype (Set.range f)] : Fintype.card (Set.range f) = Fintype.card α :=
Eq.symm <| Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.ofInjective _ <| EmbeddingLike.injective f
theorem card_eq_zero_iff : card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
rw [card, Finset.card_eq_zero, univ_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero [IsEmpty α] : card α = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
alias card_of_isEmpty := card_eq_zero
/-- A `Fintype` with cardinality zero is equivalent to `Empty`. -/
def cardEqZeroEquivEquivEmpty : card α = 0 ≃ (α ≃ Empty) :=
(Equiv.ofIff card_eq_zero_iff).trans (Equiv.equivEmptyEquiv α).symm
theorem card_pos_iff : 0 < card α ↔ Nonempty α :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_iff_comm.mp <| not_nonempty_iff.trans card_eq_zero_iff.symm
theorem card_pos [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < card α :=
card_pos_iff.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_ne_zero [Nonempty α] : card α ≠ 0 :=
_root_.ne_of_gt card_pos
instance [Nonempty α] : NeZero (card α) := ⟨card_ne_zero⟩
theorem existsUnique_iff_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(∃! a : α, p a) ↔ #{x | p x} = 1 := by
rw [Finset.card_eq_one]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
simp only [forall_true_left, Subset.antisymm_iff, subset_singleton_iff', singleton_subset_iff,
true_and, and_comm, mem_univ, mem_filter]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_iff_card_one := existsUnique_iff_card_one
nonrec theorem two_lt_card_iff : 2 < card α ↔ ∃ a b c : α, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
simp_rw [← Finset.card_univ, two_lt_card_iff, mem_univ, true_and]
theorem card_of_bijective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Fintype
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem surjective_of_injective {f : α → α} (hinj : Injective f) : Surjective f := by
intro x
have := Classical.propDecidable
cases nonempty_fintype α
have h₁ : image f univ = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _)
((card_image_of_injective univ hinj).symm ▸ le_rfl)
have h₂ : x ∈ image f univ := h₁.symm ▸ mem_univ x
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_image.1 h₂
exact ⟨y, h.2⟩
theorem injective_iff_surjective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨surjective_of_injective, fun hsurj =>
HasLeftInverse.injective ⟨surjInv hsurj, leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse
(surjective_of_injective (injective_surjInv _))
(rightInverse_surjInv _)⟩⟩
theorem injective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem surjective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Surjective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv {f : α → β} (e : α ≃ β) : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
have : Injective (e.symm ∘ f) ↔ Surjective (e.symm ∘ f) := injective_iff_surjective
⟨fun hinj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.surjective.comp (this.1 (e.symm.injective.comp hinj)),
fun hsurj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.injective.comp (this.2 (e.symm.surjective.comp hsurj))⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := injective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := surjective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.surjective_of_fintype,
_root_.Function.Surjective.injective_of_fintype⟩ :=
injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv
end Finite
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_coe (s : Finset α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = #s :=
@Fintype.card_of_finset' _ _ _ (fun _ => Iff.rfl) (id _)
/-- We can inflate a set `s` to any bigger size. -/
lemma Finset.exists_superset_card_eq [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} (hsn : #s ≤ n)
(hnα : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ #t = n := by simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.subset_univ hsn hnα
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_prop : Fintype.card Prop = 2 :=
rfl
theorem set_fintype_card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype s)
theorem set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = Set.univ := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ, ← Set.toFinset_univ, Set.toFinset_inj]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_le [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
lemma Fintype.card_subtype_lt [Fintype α] {p : α → Prop} [Fintype {a // p a}] {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) :
Fintype.card { x // p x } < Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (b := x) (↑) Subtype.coe_injective <| by
rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } = #{x | p x} := by
refine Fintype.card_of_subtype _ ?_
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_compl [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card { x // p x } := by
classical
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype (Set.toFinset { x | p x }ᶜ), Set.toFinset_compl,
Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_of_subtype] <;>
· intro
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_mono (p q : α → Prop) (h : p ≤ q) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // q x }] : Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card { x // q x } :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ h)
/-- If two subtypes of a fintype have equal cardinality, so do their complements. -/
theorem Fintype.card_compl_eq_card_compl [Finite α] (p q : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] [Fintype { x // q x }] [Fintype { x // ¬q x }]
(h : Fintype.card { x // p x } = Fintype.card { x // q x }) :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card { x // ¬q x } := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
simp only [Fintype.card_subtype_compl, h]
theorem Fintype.card_quotient_le [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α)
[DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] : Fintype.card (Quotient s) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ Quotient.mk'_surjective
theorem univ_eq_singleton_of_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (x : α) (h : Fintype.card α = 1) :
(univ : Finset α) = {x} := by
symm
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ {x})
apply le_of_eq
simp [h, Finset.card_univ]
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] [IsIrrefl α r] :
WellFounded r := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
have (x y) (hxy : r x y) : #{z | r z x} < #{z | r z y} :=
Finset.card_lt_card <| by
simp only [Finset.lt_iff_ssubset.symm, lt_iff_le_not_le, Finset.le_iff_subset,
Finset.subset_iff, mem_filter, true_and, mem_univ, hxy]
exact
⟨fun z hzx => _root_.trans hzx hxy,
not_forall_of_exists_not ⟨x, Classical.not_imp.2 ⟨hxy, irrefl x⟩⟩⟩
exact Subrelation.wf (this _ _) (measure _).wf
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedLT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedLT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedGT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedGT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
end Finite
-- Shortcut instances to make sure those are found even in the presence of other instances
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/WellFoundedLT.20Prop.20is.20not.20found.20when.20importing.20too.20much
instance Bool.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Bool := inferInstance
instance Bool.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Bool := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Prop := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Prop := inferInstance
section Trunc
/-- A `Fintype` with positive cardinality constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfCardPos {α} [Fintype α] (h : 0 < Fintype.card α) : Trunc α :=
letI := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp h
truncOfNonemptyFintype α
end Trunc
/-- A custom induction principle for fintypes. The base case is a subsingleton type,
and the induction step is for non-trivial types, and one can assume the hypothesis for
smaller types (via `Fintype.card`).
The major premise is `Fintype α`, so to use this with the `induction` tactic you have to give a name
to that instance and use that name.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Fintype.induction_subsingleton_or_nontrivial {P : ∀ (α) [Fintype α], Prop} (α : Type*)
[Fintype α] (hbase : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Subsingleton α], P α)
(hstep : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Nontrivial α],
(∀ (β) [Fintype β], Fintype.card β < Fintype.card α → P β) → P α) :
P α := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, Fintype.card α = n := ⟨Fintype.card α, rfl⟩
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih generalizing α
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with hsing | hnontriv
· apply hbase
· apply hstep
intro β _ hlt
rw [hn] at hlt
exact ih (Fintype.card β) hlt _ rfl
section Fin
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_fin (n : ℕ) : Fintype.card (Fin n) = n :=
List.length_finRange
theorem Fintype.card_fin_lt_of_le {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
Fintype.card {i : Fin n // i < m} = m := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Fintype.card_fin m]
apply Fintype.card_congr
exact { toFun := fun ⟨⟨i, _⟩, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi⟩
invFun := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hi h⟩, hi⟩
left_inv := fun i ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun i ↦ rfl }
theorem Finset.card_fin (n : ℕ) : #(univ : Finset (Fin n)) = n := by simp
/-- `Fin` as a map from `ℕ` to `Type` is injective. Note that since this is a statement about
equality of types, using it should be avoided if possible. -/
theorem fin_injective : Function.Injective Fin := fun m n h =>
(Fintype.card_fin m).symm.trans <| (Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.cast h).trans (Fintype.card_fin n)
theorem Fin.val_eq_val_of_heq {k l : ℕ} {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} (h : HEq i j) :
(i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) :=
(Fin.heq_ext_iff (fin_injective (type_eq_of_heq h))).1 h
/-- A reversed version of `Fin.cast_eq_cast` that is easier to rewrite with. -/
theorem Fin.cast_eq_cast' {n m : ℕ} (h : Fin n = Fin m) :
_root_.cast h = Fin.cast (fin_injective h) := by
cases fin_injective h
rfl
theorem card_finset_fin_le {n : ℕ} (s : Finset (Fin n)) : #s ≤ n := by
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using s.card_le_univ
end Fin
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Card.lean | 663 | 664 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
/-!
# Sections of a multiset
-/
assert_not_exists Ring
namespace Multiset
variable {α : Type*}
section Sections
/-- The sections of a multiset of multisets `s` consists of all those multisets
which can be put in bijection with `s`, so each element is a member of the corresponding multiset.
-/
def Sections (s : Multiset (Multiset α)) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Multiset.recOn s {0} (fun s _ c => s.bind fun a => c.map (Multiset.cons a)) fun a₀ a₁ _ pi => by
simp [map_bind, bind_bind a₀ a₁, cons_swap]
@[simp]
theorem sections_zero : Sections (0 : Multiset (Multiset α)) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sections_cons (s : Multiset (Multiset α)) (m : Multiset α) :
Sections (m ::ₘ s) = m.bind fun a => (Sections s).map (Multiset.cons a) :=
recOn_cons m s
theorem coe_sections :
∀ l : List (List α),
Sections (l.map fun l : List α => (l : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α)) =
(l.sections.map fun l : List α => (l : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α))
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.sections]
rw [← cons_coe, sections_cons, bind_map_comm, coe_sections l]
simp [List.sections, Function.comp_def, List.flatMap]
@[simp]
theorem sections_add (s t : Multiset (Multiset α)) :
Sections (s + t) = (Sections s).bind fun m => (Sections t).map (m + ·) :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun a s ih => by
simp [ih, bind_assoc, map_bind, bind_map]
theorem mem_sections {s : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
∀ {a}, a ∈ Sections s ↔ s.Rel (fun s a => a ∈ s) a := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, rel_cons_left, eq_comm]
theorem card_sections {s : Multiset (Multiset α)} : card (Sections s) = prod (s.map card) :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp +contextual)
end Sections
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Sections.lean | 67 | 68 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s - 1 / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
simp_rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, if_true]
/-- The modified completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s) + 1 / s + 1 / (1 - s)` is entire. -/
theorem differentiable_completedZeta₀ : Differentiable ℂ completedRiemannZeta₀ :=
differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_completedZeta {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ completedRiemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 (Or.inl hs) hs'
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ₀`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ₀(1 - s) = Λ₀ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta₀ (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero, ← completedCosZeta₀_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub]
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ (1 - s) = Λ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero, ← completedCosZeta_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub]
/-- The residue of `Λ(s)` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedRiemannZeta_residue_one :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedRiemannZeta s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one 0
/-!
## The un-completed Riemann zeta function
-/
/-- The Riemann zeta function `ζ(s)`. -/
def riemannZeta := hurwitzZetaEven 0
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZetaEven_zero : hurwitzZetaEven 0 = riemannZeta := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.cosZeta_zero : cosZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
simp_rw [cosZeta, riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, if_true, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero,
completedCosZeta_zero]
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZeta_zero : hurwitzZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
simpa [hurwitzZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_zero] using hurwitzZetaOdd_neg 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.expZeta_zero : expZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
rw [expZeta, cosZeta_zero, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro I_ne_zero, false_or,
← eq_neg_self_iff, ← sinZeta_neg, neg_zero]
/-- The Riemann zeta function is differentiable away from `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_riemannZeta {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ riemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven _ hs'
/-- We have `ζ(0) = -1 / 2`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_zero : riemannZeta 0 = -1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_self, if_true]
lemma riemannZeta_def_of_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
riemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne hs, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the zeta function. -/
theorem riemannZeta_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (n : ℕ) : riemannZeta (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 :=
hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one 0 n
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `ζ`: if `1 - s ∉ ℕ`, then we have
`ζ (1 - s) = 2 ^ (1 - s) * π ^ (-s) * Γ s * sin (π * (1 - s) / 2) * ζ s`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_one_sub {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ n : ℕ, s ≠ -n) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
riemannZeta (1 - s) = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s * cos (π * s / 2) * riemannZeta s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_one_sub 0 hs (Or.inr hs'), cosZeta_zero, hurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- A formal statement of the **Riemann hypothesis** – constructing a term of this type is worth a
million dollars. -/
def RiemannHypothesis : Prop :=
∀ (s : ℂ) (_ : riemannZeta s = 0) (_ : ¬∃ n : ℕ, s = -2 * (n + 1)) (_ : s ≠ 1), s.re = 1 / 2
/-!
## Relating the Mellin transform to the Dirichlet series
-/
theorem completedZeta_eq_tsum_of_one_lt_re {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
completedRiemannZeta s =
(π : ℂ) ^ (-s / 2) * Gamma (s / 2) * ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ s := by
have := (hasSum_nat_completedCosZeta 0 hs).tsum_eq.symm
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, completedCosZeta_zero] at this
simp only [this, Gammaℝ_def, mul_zero, zero_mul, Real.cos_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, mul_one_div,
← tsum_mul_left]
congr 1 with n
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, Nat.cast_zero, zero_cpow (Complex.ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs), div_zero]
· rfl
/-- The Riemann zeta function agrees with the naive Dirichlet-series definition when the latter
converges. (Note that this is false without the assumption: when `re s ≤ 1` the sum is divergent,
and we use a different definition to obtain the analytic continuation to all `s`.) -/
theorem zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_cpow {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
| riemannZeta s = ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ s := by
simpa only [QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, cosZeta_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, Real.cos_zero,
ofReal_one] using (hasSum_nat_cosZeta 0 hs).tsum_eq.symm
/-- Alternate formulation of `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_cpow` with a `+ 1` (to avoid relying
on mathlib's conventions for `0 ^ s`). -/
theorem zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
riemannZeta s = ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℂ) ^ s := by
have := zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_cpow hs
rw [Summable.tsum_eq_zero_add] at this
· simpa [zero_cpow (Complex.ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs)]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 179 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.LatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
/-! # Subtypes of conditionally complete linear orders
In this file we give conditions on a subset of a conditionally complete linear order, to ensure that
the subtype is itself conditionally complete.
We check that an `OrdConnected` set satisfies these conditions.
## TODO
Add appropriate instances for all `Set.Ixx`. This requires a refactor that will allow different
default values for `sSup` and `sInf`.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} (s : Set α)
section SupSet
variable [Preorder α] [SupSet α]
open Classical in
/-- `SupSet` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of a preorder with `SupSet`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder` structure. -/
noncomputable def subsetSupSet [Inhabited s] : SupSet s where
sSup t :=
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove t ∧ sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default
attribute [local instance] subsetSupSet
open Classical in
@[simp]
theorem subset_sSup_def [Inhabited s] :
@sSup s _ = fun t =>
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove t ∧ sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default :=
rfl
theorem subset_sSup_of_within [Inhabited s] {t : Set s}
(h' : t.Nonempty) (h'' : BddAbove t) (h : sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s) :
sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) = (@sSup s _ t : α) := by simp [dif_pos, h, h', h'']
theorem subset_sSup_emptyset [Inhabited s] :
sSup (∅ : Set s) = default := by
simp [sSup]
theorem subset_sSup_of_not_bddAbove [Inhabited s] {t : Set s} (ht : ¬BddAbove t) :
sSup t = default := by
simp [sSup, ht]
end SupSet
section InfSet
variable [Preorder α] [InfSet α]
open Classical in
/-- `InfSet` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of a preorder with `InfSet`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder` structure. -/
noncomputable def subsetInfSet [Inhabited s] : InfSet s where
sInf t :=
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow t ∧ sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default
attribute [local instance] subsetInfSet
open Classical in
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInf_def [Inhabited s] :
@sInf s _ = fun t =>
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow t ∧ sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩ else
default :=
rfl
theorem subset_sInf_of_within [Inhabited s] {t : Set s}
(h' : t.Nonempty) (h'' : BddBelow t) (h : sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s) :
sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) = (@sInf s _ t : α) := by simp [dif_pos, h, h', h'']
theorem subset_sInf_emptyset [Inhabited s] :
sInf (∅ : Set s) = default := by
simp [sInf]
theorem subset_sInf_of_not_bddBelow [Inhabited s] {t : Set s} (ht : ¬BddBelow t) :
sInf t = default := by
simp [sInf, ht]
end InfSet
section OrdConnected
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
attribute [local instance] subsetSupSet
attribute [local instance] subsetInfSet
/-- For a nonempty subset of a conditionally complete linear order to be a conditionally complete
linear order, it suffices that it contain the `sSup` of all its nonempty bounded-above subsets, and
the `sInf` of all its nonempty bounded-below subsets.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
noncomputable abbrev subsetConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder [Inhabited s]
(h_Sup : ∀ {t : Set s} (_ : t.Nonempty) (_h_bdd : BddAbove t), sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s)
(h_Inf : ∀ {t : Set s} (_ : t.Nonempty) (_h_bdd : BddBelow t), sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s) :
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder s :=
{ subsetSupSet s, subsetInfSet s, DistribLattice.toLattice, (inferInstance : LinearOrder s) with
le_csSup := by
rintro t c h_bdd hct
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, ← subset_sSup_of_within s ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd (h_Sup ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd)]
exact (Subtype.mono_coe _).le_csSup_image hct h_bdd
csSup_le := by
rintro t B ht hB
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, ← subset_sSup_of_within s ht ⟨B, hB⟩ (h_Sup ht ⟨B, hB⟩)]
exact (Subtype.mono_coe s).csSup_image_le ht hB
le_csInf := by
intro t B ht hB
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, ← subset_sInf_of_within s ht ⟨B, hB⟩ (h_Inf ht ⟨B, hB⟩)]
exact (Subtype.mono_coe s).le_csInf_image ht hB
csInf_le := by
rintro t c h_bdd hct
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, ← subset_sInf_of_within s ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd (h_Inf ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd)]
exact (Subtype.mono_coe s).csInf_image_le hct h_bdd
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun t ht ↦ by simp [ht]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun t ht ↦ by simp [ht] }
/-- The `sSup` function on a nonempty `OrdConnected` set `s` in a conditionally complete linear
order takes values within `s`, for all nonempty bounded-above subsets of `s`. -/
theorem sSup_within_of_ordConnected {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] ⦃t : Set s⦄ (ht : t.Nonempty)
(h_bdd : BddAbove t) : sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨c, hct⟩ : ∃ c, c ∈ t := ht
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ : ∃ B, B ∈ upperBounds t := h_bdd
refine hs.out c.2 B.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact (Subtype.mono_coe s).le_csSup_image hct ⟨B, hB⟩
| · exact (Subtype.mono_coe s).csSup_image_le ⟨c, hct⟩ hB
/-- The `sInf` function on a nonempty `OrdConnected` set `s` in a conditionally complete linear
order takes values within `s`, for all nonempty bounded-below subsets of `s`. -/
theorem sInf_within_of_ordConnected {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] ⦃t : Set s⦄ (ht : t.Nonempty)
(h_bdd : BddBelow t) : sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨c, hct⟩ : ∃ c, c ∈ t := ht
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteLatticeIntervals.lean | 151 | 157 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
| simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 427 | 430 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Monad operations on `MvPolynomial`
This file defines two monadic operations on `MvPolynomial`. Given `p : MvPolynomial σ R`,
* `MvPolynomial.bind₁` and `MvPolynomial.join₁` operate on the variable type `σ`.
* `MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` operate on the coefficient type `R`.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₁ f φ` with `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`,
is the polynomial `φ(f 1, ..., f i, ...) : MvPolynomial τ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₁ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by evaluating `φ` under the map `X f ↦ f` for `f : MvPolynomial σ R`.
In other words, if you have a polynomial `φ` in a set of variables indexed by a polynomial ring,
you evaluate the polynomial in these indexing polynomials.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₂ f φ` with `f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`
is the `MvPolynomial σ S` obtained from `φ` by mapping the coefficients of `φ` through `f`
and considering the resulting polynomial as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₂ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R)` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by considering `φ` as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
These operations themselves have algebraic structure: `MvPolynomial.bind₁`
and `MvPolynomial.join₁` are algebra homs and
`MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` are ring homs.
They interact in convenient ways with `MvPolynomial.rename`, `MvPolynomial.map`,
`MvPolynomial.vars`, and other polynomial operations.
Indeed, `MvPolynomial.rename` is the "map" operation for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair,
whereas `MvPolynomial.map` is the "map" operation for the other pair.
## Implementation notes
We add a `LawfulMonad` instance for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair.
The second pair cannot be instantiated as a `Monad`,
since it is not a monad in `Type` but in `CommRingCat` (or rather `CommSemiRingCat`).
-/
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T]
/--
`bind₁` is the "left hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`, operating on the variable type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and a map `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` taking variables
in `p` to polynomials in the variable type `τ`, `bind₁ f p` replaces each variable in `p` with
its value under `f`, producing a new polynomial in `τ`. The coefficient type remains the same.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval f
/-- `bind₂` is the "right hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`,
operating on the coefficient type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and
a map `f : R → MvPolynomial σ S` taking coefficients in `p` to polynomials over a new ring `S`,
`bind₂ f p` replaces each coefficient in `p` with its value under `f`,
producing a new polynomial over `S`.
The variable type remains the same. This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S :=
eval₂Hom f X
/--
`join₁` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₁`. Given a polynomial `p`
with coefficients in `R` whose variables are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₁ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def join₁ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval id
/--
`join₂` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₂`. Given a polynomial `p`
with variables in `σ` whose coefficients are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₂ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def join₂ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R) →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : aeval f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : eval₂Hom C f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : eval₂Hom f X = bind₂ f :=
rfl
section
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_id_eq_join₁ : aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ :=
rfl
theorem eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂Hom C id φ = join₁ φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂ : eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ :=
rfl
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
attribute [-simp]
aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂Hom_X' f X i
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) = AlgHom.id R _ := by
ext1 i
simp
variable (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R)
theorem bind₁_C_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (x) : bind₁ f (C x) = C x := algHom_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (r : R) : bind₂ f (C r) = f r :=
eval₂Hom_C f X r
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_left : bind₂ (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id _ := by ext : 2 <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_comp_C (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : (bind₂ f).comp C = f :=
RingHom.ext <| bind₂_C_right _
@[simp]
theorem join₂_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₂ (map f φ) = bind₂ f φ := by simp only [join₂, bind₂, eval₂Hom_map_hom, RingHom.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₂_comp_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : join₂.comp (map f) = bind₂ f :=
RingHom.ext <| join₂_map _
theorem aeval_id_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval id (rename f p) = aeval f p := by rw [aeval_rename, Function.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₁_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₁ (rename f φ) = bind₁ f φ :=
aeval_id_rename _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_id : bind₁ (@id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_id : bind₂ (RingHom.id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₂ :=
rfl
theorem bind₁_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₁ g) (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => bind₁ g (f i)) φ := by
simp [bind₁, ← comp_aeval]
theorem bind₁_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) :
(bind₁ g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i => bind₁ g (f i) := by
ext1
apply bind₁_bind₁
theorem bind₂_comp_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T) :
(bind₂ g).comp (bind₂ f) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) := by ext : 2 <;> simp
theorem bind₂_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₂ g) (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) φ :=
RingHom.congr_fun (bind₂_comp_bind₂ f g) φ
theorem rename_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) :
(rename g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i => rename g <| f i := by
ext1 i
simp
theorem rename_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => rename g <| f i) φ :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (rename_comp_bind₁ f g) φ
theorem map_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* T) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map g (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((map g).comp f) φ := by
simp only [bind₂, eval₂_comp_right, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_map]
congr 1 with : 1
simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_X]
theorem bind₁_comp_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) :
(bind₁ f).comp (rename g) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) := by
ext1 i
simp
theorem bind₁_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
bind₁ f (rename g φ) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) φ :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (bind₁_comp_rename f g) φ
theorem bind₂_map (f : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T) (g : R →+* S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
bind₂ f (map g φ) = bind₂ (f.comp g) φ := by simp [bind₂]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_C (f : R →+* S) : (map f).comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = C.comp f := by
ext1
apply map_C
-- mixing the two monad structures
theorem hom_bind₁ (f : MvPolynomial τ R →+* S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
f (bind₁ g φ) = eval₂Hom (f.comp C) (fun i => f (g i)) φ := by
rw [bind₁, map_aeval, algebraMap_eq]
theorem map_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (bind₁ g φ) = bind₁ (fun i : σ => (map f) (g i)) (map f φ) := by
rw [hom_bind₁, map_comp_C, ← eval₂Hom_map_hom]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_comp_C (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → S) : (eval₂Hom f g).comp C = f := by
ext1 r
exact eval₂_C f g r
theorem eval₂Hom_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : τ → S) (h : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
eval₂Hom f g (bind₁ h φ) = eval₂Hom f (fun i => eval₂Hom f g (h i)) φ := by
rw [hom_bind₁, eval₂Hom_comp_C]
theorem aeval_bind₁ [Algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₁ g φ) = aeval (fun i => aeval f (g i)) φ :=
eval₂Hom_bind₁ _ _ _ _
theorem aeval_comp_bind₁ [Algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) :
(aeval f).comp (bind₁ g) = aeval fun i => aeval f (g i) := by
ext1
apply aeval_bind₁
theorem eval₂Hom_comp_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) :
(eval₂Hom f g).comp (bind₂ h) = eval₂Hom ((eval₂Hom f g).comp h) g := by ext : 2 <;> simp
theorem eval₂Hom_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval₂Hom f g (bind₂ h φ) = eval₂Hom ((eval₂Hom f g).comp h) g φ :=
RingHom.congr_fun (eval₂Hom_comp_bind₂ f g h) φ
theorem aeval_bind₂ [Algebra S T] (f : σ → T) (g : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₂ g φ) = eval₂Hom ((↑(aeval f : _ →ₐ[S] _) : _ →+* _).comp g) f φ :=
eval₂Hom_bind₂ _ _ _ _
alias eval₂Hom_C_left := eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁
theorem bind₁_monomial (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₁ f (monomial d r) = C r * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_mul, bind₁_C_right, Finsupp.prod, map_prod,
map_pow, bind₁_X_right]
theorem bind₂_monomial (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₂ f (monomial d r) = f r * monomial d 1 := by
simp only [monomial_eq, RingHom.map_mul, bind₂_C_right, Finsupp.prod, map_prod,
map_pow, bind₂_X_right, C_1, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_monomial_one (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
bind₂ f (monomial d 1) = monomial d 1 := by rw [bind₂_monomial, f.map_one, one_mul]
section
theorem vars_bind₁ [DecidableEq τ] (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(bind₁ f φ).vars ⊆ φ.vars.biUnion fun i => (f i).vars := by
calc (bind₁ f φ).vars
_ = (φ.support.sum fun x : σ →₀ ℕ => (bind₁ f) (monomial x (coeff x φ))).vars := by
rw [← map_sum, ← φ.as_sum]
_ ≤ φ.support.biUnion fun i : σ →₀ ℕ => ((bind₁ f) (monomial i (coeff i φ))).vars :=
(vars_sum_subset _ _)
_ = φ.support.biUnion fun d : σ →₀ ℕ => vars (C (coeff d φ) * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i) := by
simp only [bind₁_monomial]
_ ≤ φ.support.biUnion fun d : σ →₀ ℕ => d.support.biUnion fun i => vars (f i) := ?_
-- proof below
_ ≤ φ.vars.biUnion fun i : σ => vars (f i) := ?_
-- proof below
· apply Finset.biUnion_mono
intro d _hd
calc
vars (C (coeff d φ) * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i) ≤
(C (coeff d φ)).vars ∪ (∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i).vars :=
vars_mul _ _
_ ≤ (∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i).vars := by
simp only [Finset.empty_union, vars_C, Finset.le_iff_subset, Finset.Subset.refl]
_ ≤ d.support.biUnion fun i : σ => vars (f i ^ d i) := vars_prod _
_ ≤ d.support.biUnion fun i : σ => (f i).vars := ?_
apply Finset.biUnion_mono
intro i _hi
apply vars_pow
· intro j
simp_rw [Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro ⟨d, hd, ⟨i, hi, hj⟩⟩
exact ⟨i, (mem_vars _).mpr ⟨d, hd, hi⟩, hj⟩
end
theorem mem_vars_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) {j : τ}
(h : j ∈ (bind₁ f φ).vars) : ∃ i : σ, i ∈ φ.vars ∧ j ∈ (f i).vars := by
classical
simpa only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_biUnion, mem_support_iff, Ne] using vars_bind₁ f φ h
instance monad : Monad fun σ => MvPolynomial σ R where
map f p := rename f p
pure := X
bind p f := bind₁ f p
instance lawfulFunctor : LawfulFunctor fun σ => MvPolynomial σ R where
map_const := by intros; rfl
-- Porting note: I guess `map_const` no longer has a default implementation?
id_map := by intros; simp [(· <$> ·)]
comp_map := by intros; simp [(· <$> ·)]
instance lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad fun σ => MvPolynomial σ R where
pure_bind := by intros; simp [pure, bind]
bind_assoc := by intros; simp [bind, ← bind₁_comp_bind₁]
seqLeft_eq := by intros; simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Seq.seq, (· <$> ·), bind₁_rename]; rfl
seqRight_eq := by intros; simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Seq.seq, (· <$> ·), bind₁_rename]; rfl
pure_seq := by intros; simp [(· <$> ·), pure, Seq.seq]
bind_pure_comp := by aesop
bind_map := by aesop
|
/-
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Monad.lean | 346 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Hom
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subsemiring.Basic
/-!
# Centroid homomorphisms
Let `A` be a (non unital, non associative) algebra. The centroid of `A` is the set of linear maps
`T` on `A` such that `T` commutes with left and right multiplication, that is to say, for all `a`
and `b` in `A`,
$$
T(ab) = (Ta)b, T(ab) = a(Tb).
$$
In mathlib we call elements of the centroid "centroid homomorphisms" (`CentroidHom`) in keeping
with `AddMonoidHom` etc.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `CentroidHom`: Maps which preserve left and right multiplication.
## Typeclasses
* `CentroidHomClass`
## References
* [Jacobson, Structure of Rings][Jacobson1956]
* [McCrimmon, A taste of Jordan algebras][mccrimmon2004]
## Tags
centroid
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function
variable {F M N R α : Type*}
/-- The type of centroid homomorphisms from `α` to `α`. -/
structure CentroidHom (α : Type*) [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] extends α →+ α where
/-- Commutativity of centroid homomorphims with left multiplication. -/
map_mul_left' (a b : α) : toFun (a * b) = a * toFun b
/-- Commutativity of centroid homomorphims with right multiplication. -/
map_mul_right' (a b : α) : toFun (a * b) = toFun a * b
attribute [nolint docBlame] CentroidHom.toAddMonoidHom
/-- `CentroidHomClass F α` states that `F` is a type of centroid homomorphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `CentroidHom`. -/
class CentroidHomClass (F : Type*) (α : outParam Type*)
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [FunLike F α α] : Prop extends AddMonoidHomClass F α α where
/-- Commutativity of centroid homomorphims with left multiplication. -/
map_mul_left (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a * b) = a * f b
/-- Commutativity of centroid homomorphims with right multiplication. -/
map_mul_right (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a * b) = f a * b
export CentroidHomClass (map_mul_left map_mul_right)
instance [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [FunLike F α α] [CentroidHomClass F α] :
CoeTC F (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨fun f ↦
{ (f : α →+ α) with
toFun := f
map_mul_left' := map_mul_left f
map_mul_right' := map_mul_right f }⟩
/-! ### Centroid homomorphisms -/
namespace CentroidHom
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
instance : FunLike (CentroidHom α) α α where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr with x
exact congrFun h x
instance : CentroidHomClass (CentroidHom α) α where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_mul_left f := f.map_mul_left'
map_mul_right f := f.map_mul_right'
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : CentroidHom α} : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CentroidHom α} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom (f : CentroidHom α) : ⇑(f : α →+ α) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAddMonoidHom_eq_coe (f : CentroidHom α) : f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom_injective : Injective ((↑) : CentroidHom α → α →+ α) :=
fun _f _g h => ext fun a ↦
haveI := DFunLike.congr_fun h a
this
/-- Turn a centroid homomorphism into an additive monoid endomorphism. -/
def toEnd (f : CentroidHom α) : AddMonoid.End α :=
(f : α →+ α)
theorem toEnd_injective : Injective (CentroidHom.toEnd : CentroidHom α → AddMonoid.End α) :=
coe_toAddMonoidHom_injective
/-- Copy of a `CentroidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : CentroidHom α) (f' : α → α) (h : f' = f) : CentroidHom α :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.copy f' <| h with
toFun := f'
map_mul_left' := fun a b ↦ by simp_rw [h, map_mul_left]
map_mul_right' := fun a b ↦ by simp_rw [h, map_mul_right] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : CentroidHom α) (f' : α → α) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : CentroidHom α) (f' : α → α) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `CentroidHom`. -/
protected def id : CentroidHom α :=
{ AddMonoidHom.id α with
map_mul_left' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_mul_right' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
instance : Inhabited (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨CentroidHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(CentroidHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toAddMonoidHom_id : (CentroidHom.id α : α →+ α) = AddMonoidHom.id α :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : CentroidHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `CentroidHom`s as a `CentroidHom`. -/
def comp (g f : CentroidHom α) : CentroidHom α :=
{ g.toAddMonoidHom.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
map_mul_left' := fun _a _b ↦ (congr_arg g <| f.map_mul_left' _ _).trans <| g.map_mul_left' _ _
map_mul_right' := fun _a _b ↦
(congr_arg g <| f.map_mul_right' _ _).trans <| g.map_mul_right' _ _ }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comp (g f : CentroidHom α) : ⇑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (g f : CentroidHom α) (a : α) : g.comp f a = g (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comp_addMonoidHom (g f : CentroidHom α) : (g.comp f : α →+ α) = (g : α →+ α).comp f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (h g f : CentroidHom α) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : CentroidHom α) : f.comp (CentroidHom.id α) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : CentroidHom α) : (CentroidHom.id α).comp f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ f : CentroidHom α} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun a ↦ congrFun (congrArg comp a) f⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g f₁ f₂ : CentroidHom α} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ ext fun a ↦ hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨{ (0 : α →+ α) with
map_mul_left' := fun _a _b ↦ (mul_zero _).symm
map_mul_right' := fun _a _b ↦ (zero_mul _).symm }⟩
instance : One (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨CentroidHom.id α⟩
instance : Add (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨fun f g ↦
{ (f + g : α →+ α) with
map_mul_left' := fun a b ↦ by
show f (a * b) + g (a * b) = a * (f b + g b)
simp [map_mul_left, mul_add]
map_mul_right' := fun a b ↦ by
show f (a * b) + g (a * b) = (f a + g a) * b
simp [map_mul_right, add_mul] }⟩
instance : Mul (CentroidHom α) :=
⟨comp⟩
variable [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [Semiring R]
variable [DistribMulAction M α] [SMulCommClass M α α] [IsScalarTower M α α]
variable [DistribMulAction N α] [SMulCommClass N α α] [IsScalarTower N α α]
variable [Module R α] [SMulCommClass R α α] [IsScalarTower R α α]
instance instSMul : SMul M (CentroidHom α) where
smul n f :=
{ (n • f : α →+ α) with
map_mul_left' := fun a b ↦ by
| change n • f (a * b) = a * n • f b
rw [map_mul_left f, ← mul_smul_comm]
map_mul_right' := fun a b ↦ by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/CentroidHom.lean | 241 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,094 | 1,099 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.MvPolynomial
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Cramer's rule and adjugate matrices
The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
It is calculated with Cramer's rule, which we introduce first.
The vectors returned by Cramer's rule are given by the linear map `cramer`,
which sends a matrix `A` and vector `b` to the vector consisting of the
determinant of replacing the `i`th column of `A` with `b` at index `i`
(written as `(A.update_column i b).det`).
Using Cramer's rule, we can compute for each matrix `A` the matrix `adjugate A`.
The entries of the adjugate are the minors of `A`.
Instead of defining a minor by deleting row `i` and column `j` of `A`, we
replace the `i`th row of `A` with the `j`th basis vector; the resulting matrix
has the same determinant but more importantly equals Cramer's rule applied
to `A` and the `j`th basis vector, simplifying the subsequent proofs.
We prove the adjugate behaves like `det A • A⁻¹`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.cramer A b`: the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
* `Matrix.adjugate A`: the adjugate (or classical adjoint) of the matrix `A`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u v w
variable {m : Type u} {n : Type v} {α : Type w}
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [CommRing α]
open Matrix Polynomial Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
section Cramer
/-!
### `cramer` section
Introduce the linear map `cramer` with values defined by `cramerMap`.
After defining `cramerMap` and showing it is linear,
we will restrict our proofs to using `cramer`.
-/
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α)
/-- `cramerMap A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramerMap A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramerMap A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramerMap` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramerMap (i : n) : α :=
(A.updateCol i b).det
theorem cramerMap_is_linear (i : n) : IsLinearMap α fun b => cramerMap A b i :=
{ map_add := det_updateCol_add _ _
map_smul := det_updateCol_smul _ _ }
theorem cramer_is_linear : IsLinearMap α (cramerMap A) := by
constructor <;> intros <;> ext i
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).1
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).2
/-- `cramer A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramer A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramer A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramer` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramer (A : Matrix n n α) : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (n → α) :=
IsLinearMap.mk' (cramerMap A) (cramer_is_linear A)
theorem cramer_apply (i : n) : cramer A b i = (A.updateCol i b).det :=
rfl
theorem cramer_transpose_apply (i : n) : cramer Aᵀ b i = (A.updateRow i b).det := by
rw [cramer_apply, updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
theorem cramer_transpose_row_self (i : n) : Aᵀ.cramer (A i) = Pi.single i A.det := by
ext j
rw [cramer_apply, Pi.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· -- i = j: this entry should be `A.det`
subst h
simp only [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose, updateRow_eq_self]
· -- i ≠ j: this entry should be 0
rw [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
apply det_zero_of_row_eq h
rw [updateRow_self, updateRow_ne (Ne.symm h)]
theorem cramer_row_self (i : n) (h : ∀ j, b j = A j i) : A.cramer b = Pi.single i A.det := by
rw [← transpose_transpose A, det_transpose]
convert cramer_transpose_row_self Aᵀ i
exact funext h
@[simp]
theorem cramer_one : cramer (1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext i j
convert congr_fun (cramer_row_self (1 : Matrix n n α) (Pi.single i 1) i _) j
· simp
· intro j
rw [Matrix.one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm]
theorem cramer_smul (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α) :
cramer (r • A) = r ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • cramer A :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => funext fun _ => det_updateCol_smul_left _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem cramer_subsingleton_apply [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (i : n) :
cramer A b i = b i := by rw [cramer_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i, updateCol_self]
theorem cramer_zero [Nontrivial n] : cramer (0 : Matrix n n α) = 0 := by
ext i j
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j'
intro j''
simp [updateCol_ne hj']
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` to take it out of a summation. -/
theorem sum_cramer {β} (s : Finset β) (f : β → n → α) :
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (f x)) = cramer A (∑ x ∈ s, f x) :=
(map_sum (cramer A) ..).symm
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` and vector evaluation to take `cramer A _ i` out of a summation. -/
theorem sum_cramer_apply {β} (s : Finset β) (f : n → β → α) (i : n) :
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (fun j => f j x) i) = cramer A (fun j : n => ∑ x ∈ s, f j x) i :=
calc
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (fun j => f j x) i) = (∑ x ∈ s, cramer A fun j => f j x) i :=
(Finset.sum_apply i s _).symm
_ = cramer A (fun j : n => ∑ x ∈ s, f j x) i := by
rw [sum_cramer, cramer_apply, cramer_apply]
simp only [updateCol]
congr with j
congr
apply Finset.sum_apply
theorem cramer_submatrix_equiv (A : Matrix m m α) (e : n ≃ m) (b : n → α) :
cramer (A.submatrix e e) b = cramer A (b ∘ e.symm) ∘ e := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, cramer_apply, updateCol_submatrix_equiv,
det_submatrix_equiv_self e, Function.comp_def]
theorem cramer_reindex (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m α) (b : n → α) :
cramer (reindex e e A) b = cramer A (b ∘ e) ∘ e.symm :=
cramer_submatrix_equiv _ _ _
end Cramer
section Adjugate
/-!
### `adjugate` section
Define the `adjugate` matrix and a few equations.
These will hold for any matrix over a commutative ring.
-/
/-- The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
Typically, the cofactor matrix is defined by taking minors,
i.e. the determinant of the matrix with a row and column removed.
However, the proof of `mul_adjugate` becomes a lot easier if we use the
matrix replacing a column with a basis vector, since it allows us to use
facts about the `cramer` map.
-/
def adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i => cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single i 1)
theorem adjugate_def (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A = of fun i => cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single i 1) :=
rfl
theorem adjugate_apply (A : Matrix n n α) (i j : n) :
adjugate A i j = (A.updateRow j (Pi.single i 1)).det := by
rw [adjugate_def, of_apply, cramer_apply, updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
theorem adjugate_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) : (adjugate A)ᵀ = adjugate Aᵀ := by
ext i j
rw [transpose_apply, adjugate_apply, adjugate_apply, updateRow_transpose, det_transpose]
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro σ _
congr 1
by_cases h : i = σ j
· -- Everything except `(i , j)` (= `(σ j , j)`) is given by A, and the rest is a single `1`.
congr
ext j'
subst h
have : σ j' = σ j ↔ j' = j := σ.injective.eq_iff
rw [updateRow_apply, updateCol_apply]
simp_rw [this]
rw [← dite_eq_ite, ← dite_eq_ite]
congr 1 with rfl
rw [Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same]
· -- Otherwise, we need to show that there is a `0` somewhere in the product.
have : (∏ j' : n, updateCol A j (Pi.single i 1) (σ j') j') = 0 := by
apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ j)
rw [updateCol_self, Pi.single_eq_of_ne' h]
rw [this]
apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ (σ⁻¹ i))
erw [apply_symm_apply σ i, updateRow_self]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne
intro h'
exact h ((symm_apply_eq σ).mp h')
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_submatrix_equiv_self (e : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m α) :
adjugate (A.submatrix e e) = (adjugate A).submatrix e e := by
ext i j
have : (fun j ↦ Pi.single i 1 <| e.symm j) = Pi.single (e i) 1 :=
Function.update_comp_equiv (0 : n → α) e.symm i 1
rw [adjugate_apply, submatrix_apply, adjugate_apply, ← det_submatrix_equiv_self e,
updateRow_submatrix_equiv, this]
theorem adjugate_reindex (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m α) :
adjugate (reindex e e A) = reindex e e (adjugate A) :=
adjugate_submatrix_equiv_self _ _
/-- Since the map `b ↦ cramer A b` is linear in `b`, it must be multiplication by some matrix. This
matrix is `A.adjugate`. -/
theorem cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) :
cramer A b = A.adjugate *ᵥ b := by
nth_rw 2 [← A.transpose_transpose]
rw [← adjugate_transpose, adjugate_def]
have : b = ∑ i, b i • (Pi.single i 1 : n → α) := by
refine (pi_eq_sum_univ b).trans ?_
congr with j
simp [Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
conv_lhs =>
rw [this]
ext k
simp [mulVec, dotProduct, mul_comm]
theorem mul_adjugate_apply (A : Matrix n n α) (i j k) :
A i k * adjugate A k j = cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single k (A i k)) j := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, adjugate, of_apply, ← Pi.smul_apply, ← LinearMap.map_smul, ← Pi.single_smul',
smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem mul_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : A * adjugate A = A.det • (1 : Matrix n n α) := by
ext i j
rw [mul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_boole]
simp [mul_adjugate_apply, sum_cramer_apply, cramer_transpose_row_self, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
theorem adjugate_mul (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A * A = A.det • (1 : Matrix n n α) :=
calc
adjugate A * A = (Aᵀ * adjugate Aᵀ)ᵀ := by
rw [← adjugate_transpose, ← transpose_mul, transpose_transpose]
_ = _ := by rw [mul_adjugate Aᵀ, det_transpose, transpose_smul, transpose_one]
theorem adjugate_smul (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α) :
adjugate (r • A) = r ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • adjugate A := by
rw [adjugate, adjugate, transpose_smul, cramer_smul]
rfl
/-- A stronger form of **Cramer's rule** that allows us to solve some instances of `A * x = b` even
if the determinant is not a unit. A sufficient (but still not necessary) condition is that `A.det`
divides `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) : A *ᵥ cramer A b = A.det • b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, mul_adjugate, smul_mulVec_assoc, one_mulVec]
theorem adjugate_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [Subsingleton.elim i j, adjugate_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i, one_apply]
theorem adjugate_eq_one_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n α} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) :
adjugate A = 1 :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
adjugate_subsingleton _
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_zero [Nontrivial n] : adjugate (0 : Matrix n n α) = 0 := by
ext i j
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j'
intro j''
simp [updateCol_ne hj']
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_one : adjugate (1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext
simp [adjugate_def, Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_diagonal (v : n → α) :
adjugate (diagonal v) = diagonal fun i => ∏ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, v j := by
ext i j
simp only [adjugate_def, cramer_apply, diagonal_transpose, of_apply]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq, diagonal_updateCol_single, det_diagonal,
prod_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, one_mul]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij]
refine det_eq_zero_of_row_eq_zero j fun k => ?_
obtain rfl | hjk := eq_or_ne k j
· rw [updateCol_self, Pi.single_eq_of_ne' hij]
· rw [updateCol_ne hjk, diagonal_apply_ne' _ hjk]
theorem _root_.RingHom.map_adjugate {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S)
(M : Matrix n n R) : f.mapMatrix M.adjugate = Matrix.adjugate (f.mapMatrix M) := by
ext i k
have : Pi.single i (1 : S) = f ∘ Pi.single i 1 := by
rw [← f.map_one]
exact Pi.single_op (fun _ => f) (fun _ => f.map_zero) i (1 : R)
rw [adjugate_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, map_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, this, ←
map_updateRow, ← RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, ← RingHom.map_det, ← adjugate_apply]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_adjugate {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (M : Matrix n n A) :
f.mapMatrix M.adjugate = Matrix.adjugate (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_adjugate _
theorem det_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : (adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) := by
-- get rid of the `- 1`
rcases (Fintype.card n).eq_zero_or_pos with h_card | h_card
· haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h_card
rw [h_card, Nat.zero_sub, pow_zero, adjugate_subsingleton, det_one]
replace h_card := tsub_add_cancel_of_le h_card.nat_succ_le
-- express `A` as an evaluation of a polynomial in n^2 variables, and solve in the polynomial ring
-- where `A'.det` is non-zero.
let A' := mvPolynomialX n n ℤ
suffices A'.adjugate.det = A'.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) by
rw [← mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval ℤ A, ← AlgHom.map_adjugate, ← AlgHom.map_det, ←
AlgHom.map_det, ← map_pow, this]
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (show A'.det ≠ 0 from det_mvPolynomialX_ne_zero n ℤ)
calc
A'.det * A'.adjugate.det = (A' * adjugate A').det := (det_mul _ _).symm
_ = A'.det ^ Fintype.card n := by rw [mul_adjugate, det_smul, det_one, mul_one]
_ = A'.det * A'.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) := by rw [← pow_succ', h_card]
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_zero (A : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 0) α) : adjugate A = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_one (A : Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 1) α) : adjugate A = 1 :=
adjugate_subsingleton A
theorem adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) α) (i j) :
adjugate A i j = (-1) ^ (j + i : ℕ) * det (A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove) := by
simp_rw [adjugate_apply, det_succ_row _ j, updateRow_self, submatrix_updateRow_succAbove]
rw [Fintype.sum_eq_single i fun h hjk => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same, mul_one]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hjk, mul_zero, zero_mul]
theorem adjugate_fin_two (A : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) :
adjugate A = !![A 1 1, -A 0 1; -A 1 0, A 0 0] := by
ext i j
rw [adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_two_of (a b c d : α) : adjugate !![a, b; c, d] = !![d, -b; -c, a] :=
adjugate_fin_two _
theorem adjugate_fin_three (A : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) :
adjugate A =
!![A 1 1 * A 2 2 - A 1 2 * A 2 1,
-(A 0 1 * A 2 2) + A 0 2 * A 2 1,
A 0 1 * A 1 2 - A 0 2 * A 1 1;
-(A 1 0 * A 2 2) + A 1 2 * A 2 0,
A 0 0 * A 2 2 - A 0 2 * A 2 0,
-(A 0 0 * A 1 2) + A 0 2 * A 1 0;
A 1 0 * A 2 1 - A 1 1 * A 2 0,
-(A 0 0 * A 2 1) + A 0 1 * A 2 0,
A 0 0 * A 1 1 - A 0 1 * A 1 0] := by
ext i j
rw [adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix, det_fin_two]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [updateRow, Fin.succAbove, Fin.lt_def] <;> ring
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_three_of (a b c d e f g h i : α) :
adjugate !![a, b, c; d, e, f; g, h, i] =
!![ e * i - f * h, -(b * i) + c * h, b * f - c * e;
-(d * i) + f * g, a * i - c * g, -(a * f) + c * d;
d * h - e * g, -(a * h) + b * g, a * e - b * d] :=
adjugate_fin_three _
theorem det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_row (A : Matrix n n α) (i : n) :
det A = ∑ j : n, A i j * adjugate A j i := by
haveI : Nonempty n := ⟨i⟩
obtain ⟨n', hn'⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Fintype.card_ne_zero : Fintype.card n ≠ 0)
obtain ⟨e⟩ := Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq hn'
let A' := reindex e e A
suffices det A' = ∑ j : Fin n'.succ, A' (e i) j * adjugate A' j (e i) by
simp_rw [A', det_reindex_self, adjugate_reindex, reindex_apply, submatrix_apply, ← e.sum_comp,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at this
exact this
rw [det_succ_row A' (e i)]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm _ (A' _ _), ← adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
theorem det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_col (A : Matrix n n α) (j : n) :
det A = ∑ i : n, A i j * adjugate A j i := by
simpa only [det_transpose, ← adjugate_transpose] using det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_row Aᵀ j
theorem adjugate_conjTranspose [StarRing α] (A : Matrix n n α) : A.adjugateᴴ = adjugate Aᴴ := by
dsimp only [conjTranspose]
have : Aᵀ.adjugate.map star = adjugate (Aᵀ.map star) := (starRingEnd α).map_adjugate Aᵀ
rw [A.adjugate_transpose, this]
theorem isRegular_of_isLeftRegular_det {A : Matrix n n α} (hA : IsLeftRegular A.det) :
IsRegular A := by
constructor
· intro B C h
refine hA.matrix ?_
simp only at h ⊢
rw [← Matrix.one_mul B, ← Matrix.one_mul C, ← Matrix.smul_mul, ← Matrix.smul_mul, ←
adjugate_mul, Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, h]
· intro B C (h : B * A = C * A)
refine hA.matrix ?_
simp only
rw [← Matrix.mul_one B, ← Matrix.mul_one C, ← Matrix.mul_smul, ← Matrix.mul_smul, ←
mul_adjugate, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, h]
theorem adjugate_mul_distrib_aux (A B : Matrix n n α) (hA : IsLeftRegular A.det)
(hB : IsLeftRegular B.det) : adjugate (A * B) = adjugate B * adjugate A := by
have hAB : IsLeftRegular (A * B).det := by
rw [det_mul]
exact hA.mul hB
refine (isRegular_of_isLeftRegular_det hAB).left ?_
simp only
rw [mul_adjugate, Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc B, mul_adjugate,
smul_mul, Matrix.one_mul, mul_smul, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, mul_comm, ← det_mul]
/-- Proof follows from "The trace Cayley-Hamilton theorem" by Darij Grinberg, Section 5.3
-/
theorem adjugate_mul_distrib (A B : Matrix n n α) : adjugate (A * B) = adjugate B * adjugate A := by
let g : Matrix n n α → Matrix n n α[X] := fun M =>
M.map Polynomial.C + (Polynomial.X : α[X]) • (1 : Matrix n n α[X])
let f' : Matrix n n α[X] →+* Matrix n n α := (Polynomial.evalRingHom 0).mapMatrix
have f'_inv : ∀ M, f' (g M) = M := by
intro
ext
simp [f', g]
have f'_adj : ∀ M : Matrix n n α, f' (adjugate (g M)) = adjugate M := by
intro
rw [RingHom.map_adjugate, f'_inv]
have f'_g_mul : ∀ M N : Matrix n n α, f' (g M * g N) = M * N := by
intros M N
rw [RingHom.map_mul, f'_inv, f'_inv]
have hu : ∀ M : Matrix n n α, IsRegular (g M).det := by
intro M
refine Polynomial.Monic.isRegular ?_
simp only [g, Polynomial.Monic.def, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff_det_X_one_add_C M, add_comm]
rw [← f'_adj, ← f'_adj, ← f'_adj, ← f'.map_mul, ←
adjugate_mul_distrib_aux _ _ (hu A).left (hu B).left, RingHom.map_adjugate,
RingHom.map_adjugate, f'_inv, f'_g_mul]
@[simp]
| theorem adjugate_pow (A : Matrix n n α) (k : ℕ) : adjugate (A ^ k) = adjugate A ^ k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k IH => rw [pow_succ', adjugate_mul_distrib, IH, pow_succ]
theorem det_smul_adjugate_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) :
det A • adjugate (adjugate A) = det A ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • A := by
have : A * (A.adjugate * A.adjugate.adjugate) =
A * (A.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • (1 : Matrix n n α)) := by
rw [← adjugate_mul_distrib, adjugate_mul, adjugate_smul, adjugate_one]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_adjugate, Matrix.mul_smul, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.smul_mul,
Matrix.one_mul] at this
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Adjugate.lean | 468 | 480 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Ainsley Pahljina
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
/-!
# The Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne primes.
We define `lucasLehmerResidue : Π p : ℕ, ZMod (2^p - 1)`, and
prove `lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 → Prime (mersenne p)`.
We construct a `norm_num` extension to calculate this residue to certify primality of Mersenne
primes using `lucas_lehmer_sufficiency`.
## TODO
- Show reverse implication.
- Speed up the calculations using `n ≡ (n % 2^p) + (n / 2^p) [MOD 2^p - 1]`.
- Find some bigger primes!
## History
This development began as a student project by Ainsley Pahljina,
and was then cleaned up for mathlib by Kim Morrison.
The tactic for certified computation of Lucas-Lehmer residues was provided by Mario Carneiro.
This tactic was ported by Thomas Murrills to Lean 4, and then it was converted to a `norm_num`
extension and made to use kernel reductions by Kyle Miller.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
/-- The Mersenne numbers, 2^p - 1. -/
def mersenne (p : ℕ) : ℕ :=
2 ^ p - 1
theorem strictMono_mersenne : StrictMono mersenne := fun m n h ↦
(Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right <| Nat.one_le_pow _ _ two_pos).2 <| by gcongr; norm_num1
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_lt_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p < mersenne q ↔ p < q :=
strictMono_mersenne.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_lt_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_lt_mersenne
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_le_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p ≤ mersenne q ↔ p ≤ q :=
strictMono_mersenne.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_le_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_le_mersenne
@[simp] theorem mersenne_zero : mersenne 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mersenne_odd : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Odd (mersenne p) ↔ p ≠ 0
| 0 => by simp
| p + 1 => by
simpa using Nat.Even.sub_odd (one_le_pow₀ one_le_two)
(even_two.pow_of_ne_zero p.succ_ne_zero) odd_one
@[simp] theorem mersenne_pos {p : ℕ} : 0 < mersenne p ↔ 0 < p := mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 0)
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
alias ⟨_, mersenne_pos_of_pos⟩ := mersenne_pos
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `mersenne`. -/
@[positivity mersenne _]
def evalMersenne : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℕ), ~q(mersenne $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(mersenne_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => pure (.nonnegative q(Nat.zero_le (mersenne $a)))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not mersenne"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_mersenne {p : ℕ} : 1 < mersenne p ↔ 1 < p :=
mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 1)
@[simp]
theorem succ_mersenne (k : ℕ) : mersenne k + 1 = 2 ^ k := by
rw [mersenne, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num)
namespace LucasLehmer
open Nat
/-!
We now define three(!) different versions of the recurrence
`s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2`.
These versions take values either in `ℤ`, in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`, or
in `ℤ` but applying `% (2^p - 1)` at each step.
They are each useful at different points in the proof,
so we take a moment setting up the lemmas relating them.
-/
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ℤ`. -/
def s : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => s i ^ 2 - 2
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def sZMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => sZMod p i ^ 2 - 2
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = ((s i)^2 - 2) % (2^p - 1)` in `ℤ`. -/
def sMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4 % (2 ^ p - 1)
| i + 1 => (sMod p i ^ 2 - 2) % (2 ^ p - 1)
theorem mersenne_int_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) : (0 : ℤ) < 2 ^ p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 <| mod_cast Nat.one_lt_two_pow hp
theorem mersenne_int_ne_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) ≠ 0 :=
(mersenne_int_pos hp).ne'
theorem sMod_nonneg (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : 0 ≤ sMod p i := by
cases i <;> dsimp [sMod]
· exact sup_eq_right.mp rfl
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
exact mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp
theorem sMod_mod (p i : ℕ) : sMod p i % (2 ^ p - 1) = sMod p i := by cases i <;> simp [sMod]
theorem sMod_lt (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : sMod p i < 2 ^ p - 1 := by
rw [← sMod_mod]
refine (Int.emod_lt_abs _ (mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp)).trans_eq ?_
exact abs_of_nonneg (mersenne_int_pos hp).le
theorem sZMod_eq_s (p' : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod (p' + 2) i = (s i : ZMod (2 ^ (p' + 2) - 1)) := by
induction i with
| zero => dsimp [s, sZMod]; norm_num
| succ i ih => push_cast [s, sZMod, ih]; rfl
-- These next two don't make good `norm_cast` lemmas.
theorem Int.natCast_pow_pred (b p : ℕ) (w : 0 < b) : ((b ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (b : ℤ) ^ p - 1 := by
have : 1 ≤ b ^ p := Nat.one_le_pow p b w
norm_cast
theorem Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred (p : ℕ) : ((2 ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) :=
Int.natCast_pow_pred 2 p (by decide)
theorem sZMod_eq_sMod (p : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod p i = (sMod p i : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)) := by
induction i <;> push_cast [← Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred p, sMod, sZMod, *] <;> rfl
/-- The Lucas-Lehmer residue is `s p (p-2)` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def lucasLehmerResidue (p : ℕ) : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1) :=
sZMod p (p - 2)
theorem residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero (p : ℕ) (w : 1 < p) :
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 ↔ sMod p (p - 2) = 0 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue]
rw [sZMod_eq_sMod p]
constructor
· -- We want to use that fact that `0 ≤ s_mod p (p-2) < 2^p - 1`
-- and `lucas_lehmer_residue p = 0 → 2^p - 1 ∣ s_mod p (p-2)`.
intro h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, ofNat_pos, pow_pos, cast_pred,
cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
apply Int.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt _ _ h <;> clear h
· exact sMod_nonneg _ (by positivity) _
· exact sMod_lt _ (by positivity) _
· intro h
rw [h]
simp
/-- **Lucas-Lehmer Test**: a Mersenne number `2^p-1` is prime if and only if
the Lucas-Lehmer residue `s p (p-2) % (2^p - 1)` is zero.
-/
def LucasLehmerTest (p : ℕ) : Prop :=
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0
/-- `q` is defined as the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, bundled as an `ℕ+`. -/
def q (p : ℕ) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.minFac (mersenne p), Nat.minFac_pos (mersenne p)⟩
-- It would be nice to define this as (ℤ/qℤ)[x] / (x^2 - 3),
-- obtaining the ring structure for free,
-- but that seems to be more trouble than it's worth;
-- if it were easy to make the definition,
-- cardinality calculations would be somewhat more involved, too.
/-- We construct the ring `X q` as ℤ/qℤ + √3 ℤ/qℤ. -/
def X (q : ℕ+) : Type :=
ZMod q × ZMod q
namespace X
variable {q : ℕ+}
instance : Inhabited (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : Fintype (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : DecidableEq (X q) := inferInstanceAs (DecidableEq (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : AddCommGroup (X q) := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (ZMod q × ZMod q))
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : X q} (h₁ : x.1 = y.1) (h₂ : x.2 = y.2) : x = y := by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[simp] theorem zero_fst : (0 : X q).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_snd : (0 : X q).2 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_fst (x y : X q) : (x + y).1 = x.1 + y.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_snd (x y : X q) : (x + y).2 = x.2 + y.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_fst (x : X q) : (-x).1 = -x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_snd (x : X q) : (-x).2 = -x.2 :=
rfl
instance : Mul (X q) where mul x y := (x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2, x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1)
@[simp]
theorem mul_fst (x y : X q) : (x * y).1 = x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_snd (x y : X q) : (x * y).2 = x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1 :=
rfl
instance : One (X q) where one := ⟨1, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_fst : (1 : X q).1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_snd : (1 : X q).2 = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Monoid (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Mul (X q)), inferInstanceAs (One (X q)) with
mul_assoc := fun x y z => by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
one_mul := fun x => by ext <;> simp
mul_one := fun x => by ext <;> simp }
instance : NatCast (X q) where
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
@[simp] theorem fst_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_fst (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : X q).fst = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_snd (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : X q).snd = 0 :=
rfl
instance : AddGroupWithOne (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (NatCast (X q)) with
natCast_zero := by ext <;> simp
natCast_succ := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
intCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by ext <;> simp
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by ext <;> simp }
theorem left_distrib (x y z : X q) : x * (y + z) = x * y + x * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
theorem right_distrib (x y z : X q) : (x + y) * z = x * z + y * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
instance : Ring (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddGroupWithOne (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)) with
left_distrib := left_distrib
right_distrib := right_distrib
mul_zero := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
zero_mul := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp }
instance : CommRing (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Ring (X q)) with
mul_comm := fun _ _ ↦ by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring }
instance [Fact (1 < (q : ℕ))] : Nontrivial (X q) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, ne_of_apply_ne Prod.fst zero_ne_one⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem fst_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (n m : ℤ) : ((n * m : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) * (m : X q) := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) := by ext <;> simp
/-- The cardinality of `X` is `q^2`. -/
theorem card_eq : Fintype.card (X q) = q ^ 2 := by
dsimp [X]
rw [Fintype.card_prod, ZMod.card q, sq]
/-- There are strictly fewer than `q^2` units, since `0` is not a unit. -/
nonrec theorem card_units_lt (w : 1 < q) : Fintype.card (X q)ˣ < q ^ 2 := by
have : Fact (1 < (q : ℕ)) := ⟨w⟩
convert card_units_lt (X q)
rw [card_eq]
/-- We define `ω = 2 + √3`. -/
def ω : X q := (2, 1)
/-- We define `ωb = 2 - √3`, which is the inverse of `ω`. -/
def ωb : X q := (2, -1)
theorem ω_mul_ωb (q : ℕ+) : (ω : X q) * ωb = 1 := by
dsimp [ω, ωb]
ext <;> simp; ring
theorem ωb_mul_ω (q : ℕ+) : (ωb : X q) * ω = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, ω_mul_ωb]
/-- A closed form for the recurrence relation. -/
theorem closed_form (i : ℕ) : (s i : X q) = (ω : X q) ^ 2 ^ i + (ωb : X q) ^ 2 ^ i := by
induction i with
| zero =>
dsimp [s, ω, ωb]
ext <;> norm_num
| succ i ih =>
calc
(s (i + 1) : X q) = (s i ^ 2 - 2 : ℤ) := rfl
_ = (s i : X q) ^ 2 - 2 := by push_cast; rfl
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i + ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 - 2 := by rw [ih]
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + 2 * (ωb ^ 2 ^ i * ω ^ 2 ^ i) - 2 := by ring
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 := by
rw [← mul_pow ωb ω, ωb_mul_ω, one_pow, mul_one, add_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ω ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) + ωb ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) := by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul, _root_.pow_succ]
end X
open X
/-!
Here and below, we introduce `p' = p - 2`, in order to avoid using subtraction in `ℕ`.
-/
/-- If `1 < p`, then `q p`, the smallest prime factor of `mersenne p`, is more than 2. -/
theorem two_lt_q (p' : ℕ) : 2 < q (p' + 2) := by
refine (minFac_prime (one_lt_mersenne.2 ?_).ne').two_le.lt_of_ne' ?_
· exact le_add_left _ _
· rw [Ne, minFac_eq_two_iff, mersenne, Nat.pow_succ']
exact Nat.two_not_dvd_two_mul_sub_one Nat.one_le_two_pow
theorem ω_pow_formula (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
∃ k : ℤ,
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) =
k * mersenne (p' + 2) * (ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ p' - 1 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue] at h
rw [sZMod_eq_s p'] at h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_right, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, ofNat_pos,
pow_pos, cast_pred, cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
obtain ⟨k, h⟩ := h
use k
replace h := congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (n : X (q (p' + 2)))) h
-- coercion from ℤ to X q
dsimp at h
rw [closed_form] at h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x => ω ^ 2 ^ p' * x) h
dsimp at h
have t : 2 ^ p' + 2 ^ p' = 2 ^ (p' + 1) := by ring
rw [mul_add, ← pow_add ω, t, ← mul_pow ω ωb (2 ^ p'), ω_mul_ωb, one_pow] at h
rw [mul_comm, coe_mul] at h
rw [mul_comm _ (k : X (q (p' + 2)))] at h
replace h := eq_sub_of_add_eq h
have : 1 ≤ 2 ^ (p' + 2) := Nat.one_le_pow _ _ (by decide)
exact mod_cast h
/-- `q` is the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, so `M p = 0` in `X q`. -/
theorem mersenne_coe_X (p : ℕ) : (mersenne p : X (q p)) = 0 := by
ext <;> simp [mersenne, q, ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, -pow_pos]
apply Nat.minFac_dvd
theorem ω_pow_eq_neg_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) = -1 := by
obtain ⟨k, w⟩ := ω_pow_formula p' h
rw [mersenne_coe_X] at w
simpa using w
theorem ω_pow_eq_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = 1 :=
calc
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = (ω ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1)) ^ 2 := by
rw [← pow_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ]
_ = (-1) ^ 2 := by rw [ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h]
_ = 1 := by simp
/-- `ω` as an element of the group of units. -/
def ωUnit (p : ℕ) : Units (X (q p)) where
val := ω
inv := ωb
val_inv := ω_mul_ωb _
inv_val := ωb_mul_ω _
@[simp]
theorem ωUnit_coe (p : ℕ) : (ωUnit p : X (q p)) = ω :=
rfl
/-- The order of `ω` in the unit group is exactly `2^p`. -/
theorem order_ω (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
orderOf (ωUnit (p' + 2)) = 2 ^ (p' + 2) := by
apply Nat.eq_prime_pow_of_dvd_least_prime_pow
-- the order of ω divides 2^p
· exact Nat.prime_two
· intro o
have ω_pow := orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.1 o
replace ω_pow :=
congr_arg (Units.coeHom (X (q (p' + 2))) : Units (X (q (p' + 2))) → X (q (p' + 2))) ω_pow
simp? at ω_pow says
simp only [Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, ωUnit_coe, Units.val_one] at ω_pow
have h : (1 : ZMod (q (p' + 2))) = -1 :=
congr_arg Prod.fst (ω_pow.symm.trans (ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h))
haveI : Fact (2 < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ)) := ⟨two_lt_q _⟩
apply ZMod.neg_one_ne_one h.symm
· apply orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.2
apply Units.ext
push_cast
exact ω_pow_eq_one p' h
theorem order_ineq (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
2 ^ (p' + 2) < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ) ^ 2 :=
calc
2 ^ (p' + 2) = orderOf (ωUnit (p' + 2)) := (order_ω p' h).symm
_ ≤ Fintype.card (X (q (p' + 2)))ˣ := orderOf_le_card_univ
_ < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ) ^ 2 := card_units_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt (two_lt_q _))
| end LucasLehmer
export LucasLehmer (LucasLehmerTest lucasLehmerResidue)
open LucasLehmer
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LucasLehmer.lean | 457 | 461 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
/-!
# Higher differentiability over `ℝ` or `ℂ`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped NNReal Topology
section Real
/-!
### Results over `ℝ` or `ℂ`
The results in this section rely on the Mean Value Theorem, and therefore hold only over `ℝ` (and
its extension fields such as `ℂ`).
-/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {𝕂 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕂] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕂 E'] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕂 F']
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least 1, then at points in the interior of the
domain of definition, the term of order 1 of this series is a strict derivative of `f`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.hasStrictFDerivAt {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{s : Set E'} {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
{p : E' → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕂 E' F'} (hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : HasStrictFDerivAt f ((continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕂 E' F') (p x 1)) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt (hf.eventually_hasFDerivAt hn hs) <|
(continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕂 E' F').continuousAt.comp <| (hf.cont 1 hn).continuousAt hs
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt' {f : E' → F'} {f' : E' →L[𝕂] F'} {x : E'}
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hf' : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
rcases hf.of_le hn 1 le_rfl with ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩
simp only [nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, insert_eq_of_mem] at H
have := hp.hasStrictFDerivAt le_rfl H
rwa [hf'.unique this.hasFDerivAt]
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt' {f : 𝕂 → F'} {f' : F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x)
(hf' : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' (hf.differentiableAt hn).hasFDerivAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt hn).hasStrictDerivAt
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiff.hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : ContDiff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.contDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiff.hasStrictDerivAt {f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
hf.contDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt hn
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
and `‖p x 1‖₊ < K`, then `f` is `K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt {E F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ E F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (K : ℝ≥0)
(hK : ‖p x 1‖₊ < K) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t := by
set f' := fun y => continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 ℝ E F (p y 1)
have hder : ∀ y ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y := fun y hy =>
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt le_rfl (subset_insert x s hy)).mono (subset_insert x s)
| have hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x :=
(continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 ℝ E F).continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
((hf.cont _ le_rfl _ (mem_insert _ _)).mono (subset_insert x s))
replace hK : ‖f' x‖₊ < K := by simpa only [f', LinearIsometryEquiv.nnnorm_map]
exact
hs.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt
(eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| Eventually.of_forall hder) hcont K hK
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
then `f` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.exists_lipschitzOnWith {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ E F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : Convex ℝ s) :
∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/RCLike.lean | 87 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
|
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 299 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
|
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 369 | 372 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
| ‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 870 | 886 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.CancelLeads
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
/-!
# GCD structures on polynomials
Definitions and basic results about polynomials over GCD domains, particularly their contents
and primitive polynomials.
## Main Definitions
Let `p : R[X]`.
- `p.content` is the `gcd` of the coefficients of `p`.
- `p.IsPrimitive` indicates that `p.content = 1`.
## Main Results
- `Polynomial.content_mul`:
If `p q : R[X]`, then `(p * q).content = p.content * q.content`.
- `Polynomial.NormalizedGcdMonoid`:
The polynomial ring of a GCD domain is itself a GCD domain.
## Note
This has nothing to do with minimal polynomials of primitive elements in finite fields.
-/
namespace Polynomial
section Primitive
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A polynomial is primitive when the only constant polynomials dividing it are units.
Note: This has nothing to do with minimal polynomials of primitive elements in finite fields. -/
def IsPrimitive (p : R[X]) : Prop :=
∀ r : R, C r ∣ p → IsUnit r
theorem isPrimitive_iff_isUnit_of_C_dvd {p : R[X]} : p.IsPrimitive ↔ ∀ r : R, C r ∣ p → IsUnit r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isPrimitive_one : IsPrimitive (1 : R[X]) := fun _ h =>
isUnit_C.mp (isUnit_of_dvd_one h)
theorem Monic.isPrimitive {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.IsPrimitive := by
rintro r ⟨q, h⟩
exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one r (q.coeff p.natDegree) (by rwa [← coeff_C_mul, ← h])
theorem IsPrimitive.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.IsPrimitive) : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact (hp 0 (dvd_zero (C 0))).ne_zero rfl
theorem isPrimitive_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (hp : IsPrimitive p) (hq : q ∣ p) : IsPrimitive q :=
fun a ha => isPrimitive_iff_isUnit_of_C_dvd.mp hp a (dvd_trans ha hq)
/-- An irreducible nonconstant polynomial over a domain is primitive. -/
theorem _root_.Irreducible.isPrimitive [NoZeroDivisors R]
{p : Polynomial R} (hp : Irreducible p) (hp' : p.natDegree ≠ 0) : p.IsPrimitive := by
rintro r ⟨q, hq⟩
suffices ¬IsUnit q by simpa using ((hp.2 hq).resolve_right this).map Polynomial.constantCoeff
intro H
have hr : r ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp_all
obtain ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ := Polynomial.isUnit_iff.mp H
simp [hq, Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul hr] at hp'
end Primitive
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
section NormalizedGCDMonoid
variable [NormalizedGCDMonoid R]
/-- `p.content` is the `gcd` of the coefficients of `p`. -/
def content (p : R[X]) : R :=
p.support.gcd p.coeff
theorem content_dvd_coeff {p : R[X]} (n : ℕ) : p.content ∣ p.coeff n := by
by_cases h : n ∈ p.support
· apply Finset.gcd_dvd h
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not] at h
rw [h]
apply dvd_zero
@[simp]
theorem content_C {r : R} : (C r).content = normalize r := by
rw [content]
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· simp [h0]
have h : (C r).support = {0} := support_monomial _ h0
simp [h]
@[simp]
| theorem content_zero : content (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by rw [← C_0, content_C, normalize_zero]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Content.lean | 102 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
/-!
# Flows and invariant sets
This file defines a flow on a topological space `α` by a topological
monoid `τ` as a continuous monoid-action of `τ` on `α`. Anticipating the
cases where `τ` is one of `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℝ⁺`, or `ℝ`, we use additive
notation for the monoids, though the definition does not require
commutativity.
A subset `s` of `α` is invariant under a family of maps `ϕₜ : α → α`
if `ϕₜ s ⊆ s` for all `t`. In many cases `ϕ` will be a flow on
`α`. For the cases where `ϕ` is a flow by an ordered (additive,
commutative) monoid, we additionally define forward invariance, where
`t` ranges over those elements which are nonnegative.
Additionally, we define such constructions as the restriction of a
flow onto an invariant subset, and the time-reversal of a flow by a
group.
-/
open Set Function Filter
/-!
### Invariant sets
-/
section Invariant
variable {τ : Type*} {α : Type*}
/-- A set `s ⊆ α` is invariant under `ϕ : τ → α → α` if
`ϕ t s ⊆ s` for all `t` in `τ`. -/
def IsInvariant (ϕ : τ → α → α) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, MapsTo (ϕ t) s s
variable (ϕ : τ → α → α) (s : Set α)
theorem isInvariant_iff_image : IsInvariant ϕ s ↔ ∀ t, ϕ t '' s ⊆ s := by
simp_rw [IsInvariant, mapsTo']
/-- A set `s ⊆ α` is forward-invariant under `ϕ : τ → α → α` if
`ϕ t s ⊆ s` for all `t ≥ 0`. -/
def IsFwInvariant [Preorder τ] [Zero τ] (ϕ : τ → α → α) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t⦄, 0 ≤ t → MapsTo (ϕ t) s s
theorem IsInvariant.isFwInvariant [Preorder τ] [Zero τ] {ϕ : τ → α → α} {s : Set α}
(h : IsInvariant ϕ s) : IsFwInvariant ϕ s := fun t _ht => h t
/-- If `τ` is a `CanonicallyOrderedAdd` monoid (e.g., `ℕ` or `ℝ≥0`), then the notions
`IsFwInvariant` and `IsInvariant` are equivalent. -/
theorem IsFwInvariant.isInvariant [AddMonoid τ] [PartialOrder τ] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd τ]
{ϕ : τ → α → α} {s : Set α}
(h : IsFwInvariant ϕ s) : IsInvariant ϕ s := fun t => h (zero_le t)
/-- If `τ` is a `CanonicallyOrderedAdd` monoid (e.g., `ℕ` or `ℝ≥0`), then the notions
`IsFwInvariant` and `IsInvariant` are equivalent. -/
theorem isFwInvariant_iff_isInvariant [AddMonoid τ] [PartialOrder τ] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd τ]
{ϕ : τ → α → α} {s : Set α} :
IsFwInvariant ϕ s ↔ IsInvariant ϕ s :=
⟨IsFwInvariant.isInvariant, IsInvariant.isFwInvariant⟩
end Invariant
/-!
### Flows
-/
/-- A flow on a topological space `α` by an additive topological
monoid `τ` is a continuous monoid action of `τ` on `α`. -/
structure Flow (τ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace τ] [AddMonoid τ] [ContinuousAdd τ] (α : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace α] where
/-- The map `τ → α → α` underlying a flow of `τ` on `α`. -/
toFun : τ → α → α
cont' : Continuous (uncurry toFun)
map_add' : ∀ t₁ t₂ x, toFun (t₁ + t₂) x = toFun t₁ (toFun t₂ x)
map_zero' : ∀ x, toFun 0 x = x
namespace Flow
variable {τ : Type*} [AddMonoid τ] [TopologicalSpace τ] [ContinuousAdd τ]
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] (ϕ : Flow τ α)
instance : Inhabited (Flow τ α) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ x => x
cont' := continuous_snd
map_add' := fun _ _ _ => rfl
map_zero' := fun _ => rfl }⟩
instance : CoeFun (Flow τ α) fun _ => τ → α → α := ⟨Flow.toFun⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {ϕ₁ ϕ₂ : Flow τ α}, (∀ t x, ϕ₁ t x = ϕ₂ t x) → ϕ₁ = ϕ₂
| ⟨f₁, _, _, _⟩, ⟨f₂, _, _, _⟩, h => by
congr
funext
exact h _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected theorem continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {t : β → τ} (ht : Continuous t)
{f : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x => ϕ (t x) (f x) :=
ϕ.cont'.comp (ht.prodMk hf)
alias _root_.Continuous.flow := Flow.continuous
theorem map_add (t₁ t₂ : τ) (x : α) : ϕ (t₁ + t₂) x = ϕ t₁ (ϕ t₂ x) := ϕ.map_add' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : ϕ 0 = id := funext ϕ.map_zero'
theorem map_zero_apply (x : α) : ϕ 0 x = x := ϕ.map_zero' x
/-- Iterations of a continuous function from a topological space `α`
to itself defines a semiflow by `ℕ` on `α`. -/
def fromIter {g : α → α} (h : Continuous g) : Flow ℕ α where
toFun n x := g^[n] x
cont' := continuous_prod_of_discrete_left.mpr (Continuous.iterate h)
map_add' := iterate_add_apply _
map_zero' _x := rfl
/-- Restriction of a flow onto an invariant set. -/
def restrict {s : Set α} (h : IsInvariant ϕ s) : Flow τ (↥s) where
toFun t := (h t).restrict _ _ _
cont' := (ϕ.continuous continuous_fst continuous_subtype_val.snd').subtype_mk _
map_add' _ _ _ := Subtype.ext (map_add _ _ _ _)
map_zero' _ := Subtype.ext (map_zero_apply _ _)
end Flow
namespace Flow
variable {τ : Type*} [AddCommGroup τ] [TopologicalSpace τ] [IsTopologicalAddGroup τ]
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] (ϕ : Flow τ α)
theorem isInvariant_iff_image_eq (s : Set α) : IsInvariant ϕ s ↔ ∀ t, ϕ t '' s = s :=
(isInvariant_iff_image _ _).trans
(Iff.intro
(fun h t => Subset.antisymm (h t) fun _ hx => ⟨_, h (-t) ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩, by simp [← map_add]⟩)
fun h t => by rw [h t])
/-- The time-reversal of a flow `ϕ` by a (commutative, additive) group
is defined `ϕ.reverse t x = ϕ (-t) x`. -/
def reverse : Flow τ α where
toFun t := ϕ (-t)
cont' := ϕ.continuous continuous_fst.neg continuous_snd
map_add' _ _ _ := by rw [neg_add, map_add]
map_zero' _ := by rw [neg_zero, map_zero_apply]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
| theorem continuous_toFun (t : τ) : Continuous (ϕ.toFun t) := by
fun_prop
/-- The map `ϕ t` as a homeomorphism. -/
def toHomeomorph (t : τ) : (α ≃ₜ α) where
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Flow.lean | 158 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Indexed product measures
In this file we define and prove properties about finite products of measures
(and at some point, countable products of measures).
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`: The product of finitely many σ-finite measures.
Given `μ : (i : ι) → Measure (α i)` for `[Fintype ι]` it has type `Measure ((i : ι) → α i)`.
To apply Fubini's theorem or Tonelli's theorem along some subset, we recommend using the marginal
construction `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` and (todo) `MeasureTheory.marginal`. This allows you to
apply the theorems without any bookkeeping with measurable equivalences.
## Implementation Notes
We define `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`, the product of finitely many outer measures, as the
maximal outer measure `n` with the property that `n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`,
where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets `{s i | i : ι}`.
We then show that this induces a product of measures, called `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
For a collection of σ-finite measures `μ` and a collection of measurable sets `s` we show that
`Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i)`. To do this, we follow the following steps:
* We know that there is some ordering on `ι`, given by an element of `[Countable ι]`.
* Using this, we have an equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd` between
`∀ ι, α i` and an iterated product of `α i`, called `List.tprod α l` for some list `l`.
* On this iterated product we can easily define a product measure `MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod`
by iterating `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`
* Using the previous two steps we construct `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` on `(i : ι) → α i` for
countable `ι`.
* We know that `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` sends products of sets to products of measures, and
since `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` is the maximal such measure (or at least, it comes from an outer
measure which is the maximal such outer measure), we get the same rule for
`MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
## Tags
finitary product measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure Filter MeasurableSpace Encodable
open scoped Topology ENNReal
universe u v
variable {ι ι' : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [Fintype ι] {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)}
/-- An upper bound for the measure in a finite product space.
It is defined to by taking the image of the set under all projections, and taking the product
of the measures of these images.
For measurable boxes it is equal to the correct measure. -/
@[simp]
def piPremeasure (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : Set (∀ i, α i)) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∏ i, m i (eval i '' s)
theorem piPremeasure_pi {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (hs : (pi univ s).Nonempty) :
piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by simp [hs, piPremeasure]
theorem piPremeasure_pi' {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} : piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [piPremeasure]
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· rcases univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩
have : ∃ i, m i (s i) = 0 := ⟨i, by simp [hi]⟩
simpa [h, Finset.card_univ, zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero, @eq_comm _ (0 : ℝ≥0∞),
Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, piPremeasure]
· simp [h, piPremeasure]
theorem piPremeasure_pi_mono {s t : Set (∀ i, α i)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
piPremeasure m s ≤ piPremeasure m t :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => measure_mono (image_subset _ h)
theorem piPremeasure_pi_eval {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
piPremeasure m (pi univ fun i => eval i '' s) = piPremeasure m s := by
simp only [eval, piPremeasure_pi']; rfl
namespace OuterMeasure
/-- `OuterMeasure.pi m` is the finite product of the outer measures `{m i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be the maximal outer measure `n` with the property that
`n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`, where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets
`{s i | i : ι}`. -/
protected def pi (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i) :=
boundedBy (piPremeasure m)
theorem pi_pi_le (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
OuterMeasure.pi m (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
exact (boundedBy_le _).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi h)
theorem le_pi {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)} {n : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i)} :
n ≤ OuterMeasure.pi m ↔
∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (pi univ s).Nonempty → n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.pi, le_boundedBy']; constructor
· intro h s hs; refine (h _ hs).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi hs)
· intro h s hs; refine le_trans (n.mono <| subset_pi_eval_image univ s) (h _ ?_)
simp [univ_pi_nonempty_iff, hs]
end OuterMeasure
namespace Measure
variable [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i))
section Tprod
open List
variable {δ : Type*} {X : δ → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (X i)]
-- for some reason the equation compiler doesn't like this definition
/-- A product of measures in `tprod α l`. -/
protected def tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) : Measure (TProd X l) := by
induction' l with i l ih
· exact dirac PUnit.unit
· exact (μ i).prod (α := X i) ih
@[simp]
theorem tprod_nil (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) : Measure.tprod [] μ = dirac PUnit.unit :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tprod_cons (i : δ) (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) :
Measure.tprod (i :: l) μ = (μ i).prod (Measure.tprod l μ) :=
rfl
instance sigmaFinite_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
SigmaFinite (Measure.tprod l μ) := by
induction l with
| nil => rw [tprod_nil]; infer_instance
| cons i l ih => rw [tprod_cons]; exact @prod.instSigmaFinite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih
theorem tprod_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (X i)) :
Measure.tprod l μ (Set.tprod l s) = (l.map fun i => (μ i) (s i)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [tprod_cons, Set.tprod]
dsimp only [foldr_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
rw [prod_prod, ih]
end Tprod
section Encodable
open List MeasurableEquiv
variable [Encodable ι]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The product measure on an encodable finite type, defined by mapping `Measure.tprod` along the
equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd`.
The definition `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` should be used instead of this one. -/
def pi' : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
Measure.map (TProd.elim' mem_sortedUniv) (Measure.tprod (sortedUniv ι) μ)
theorem pi'_pi [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi' μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
classical
rw [pi']
rw [← MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, MeasurableEquiv.map_apply,
MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, elim_preimage_pi, tprod_tprod _ μ, ←
List.prod_toFinset, sortedUniv_toFinset] <;>
exact sortedUniv_nodup ι
end Encodable
theorem pi_caratheodory :
MeasurableSpace.pi ≤ (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure).caratheodory := by
refine iSup_le ?_
intro i s hs
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
apply boundedBy_caratheodory
intro t
simp_rw [piPremeasure]
refine Finset.prod_add_prod_le' (Finset.mem_univ i) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp [image_inter_preimage, image_diff_preimage, measure_inter_add_diff _ hs, le_refl]
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply diff_subset
/-- `Measure.pi μ` is the finite product of the measures `{μ i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be measure corresponding to `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`. -/
protected irreducible_def pi : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
toMeasure (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) (pi_caratheodory μ)
instance _root_.MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.pi {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] :
MeasureSpace (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨Measure.pi fun _ => volume⟩
theorem pi_pi_aux [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Measure.pi, toMeasure_apply _ _ (MeasurableSet.pi countable_univ fun i _ => hs i)]
apply OuterMeasure.pi_pi_le
· haveI : Encodable ι := Fintype.toEncodable ι
simp_rw [← pi'_pi μ s, Measure.pi,
toMeasure_apply _ _ (MeasurableSet.pi countable_univ fun i _ => hs i)]
suffices (pi' μ).toOuterMeasure ≤ OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure by exact this _
clear hs s
rw [OuterMeasure.le_pi]
intro s _
exact (pi'_pi μ s).le
variable {μ}
/-- `Measure.pi μ` has finite spanning sets in rectangles of finite spanning sets. -/
def FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hμ : ∀ i, (μ i).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (C i)) :
(Measure.pi μ).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
haveI := fun i => (hμ i).sigmaFinite
haveI := Fintype.toEncodable ι
refine ⟨fun n => Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set ((@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget i),
fun n => ?_, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- TODO (kmill) If this let comes before the refine, while the noncomputability checker
-- correctly sees this definition is computable, the Lean VM fails to see the binding is
-- computationally irrelevant. The `noncomputable section` doesn't help because all it does
-- is insert `noncomputable` for you when necessary.
let e : ℕ → ι → ℕ := fun n => (@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget
· refine mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => (hμ i).set_mem _
· calc
Measure.pi μ (Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set (e n i)) ≤
Measure.pi μ (Set.pi univ fun i => toMeasurable (μ i) ((hμ i).set (e n i))) :=
measure_mono (pi_mono fun i _ => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = ∏ i, μ i (toMeasurable (μ i) ((hμ i).set (e n i))) :=
(pi_pi_aux μ _ fun i => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = ∏ i, μ i ((hμ i).set (e n i)) := by simp only [measure_toMeasurable]
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.prod_lt_top fun i _ => (hμ i).finite _
· simp_rw [(surjective_decode_iget (ι → ℕ)).iUnion_comp fun x =>
Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set (x i),
iUnion_univ_pi fun i => (hμ i).set, (hμ _).spanning, Set.pi_univ]
/-- A measure on a finite product space equals the product measure if they are equal on rectangles
with as sides sets that generate the corresponding σ-algebras. -/
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hC : ∀ i, generateFrom (C i) = by apply_assumption) (h2C : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i))
(h3C : ∀ i, (μ i).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (C i)) {μν : Measure (∀ i, α i)}
(h₁ : ∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, s i ∈ C i) → μν (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ = μν := by
have h4C : ∀ (i) (s : Set (α i)), s ∈ C i → MeasurableSet s := by
intro i s hs; rw [← hC]; exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
refine
(FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi h3C).ext
(generateFrom_eq_pi hC fun i => (h3C i).isCountablySpanning).symm (IsPiSystem.pi h2C) ?_
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
rw [mem_univ_pi] at hs
haveI := fun i => (h3C i).sigmaFinite
simp_rw [h₁ s hs, pi_pi_aux μ s fun i => h4C i _ (hs i)]
variable [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
/-- A measure on a finite product space equals the product measure if they are equal on
rectangles. -/
theorem pi_eq {μ' : Measure (∀ i, α i)}
(h : ∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) → μ' (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ = μ' :=
pi_eq_generateFrom (fun _ => generateFrom_measurableSet) (fun _ => isPiSystem_measurableSet)
(fun i => (μ i).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn) h
variable (μ)
theorem pi'_eq_pi [Encodable ι] : pi' μ = Measure.pi μ :=
Eq.symm <| pi_eq fun s _ => pi'_pi μ s
@[simp]
theorem pi_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
haveI : Encodable ι := Fintype.toEncodable ι
rw [← pi'_eq_pi, pi'_pi]
nonrec theorem pi_univ : Measure.pi μ univ = ∏ i, μ i univ := by rw [← pi_univ, pi_pi μ]
theorem pi_ball [∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
Measure.pi μ (Metric.ball x r) = ∏ i, μ i (Metric.ball (x i) r) := by rw [ball_pi _ hr, pi_pi]
theorem pi_closedBall [∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Measure.pi μ (Metric.closedBall x r) = ∏ i, μ i (Metric.closedBall (x i) r) := by
rw [closedBall_pi _ hr, pi_pi]
instance pi.sigmaFinite : SigmaFinite (Measure.pi μ) :=
(FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi fun i => (μ i).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn).sigmaFinite
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] :
SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.sigmaFinite _
instance pi.instIsFiniteMeasure [∀ i, IsFiniteMeasure (μ i)] :
IsFiniteMeasure (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨Measure.pi_univ μ ▸ ENNReal.prod_lt_top (fun i _ ↦ measure_lt_top (μ i) _)⟩
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (α i))] :
IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.instIsFiniteMeasure _
instance pi.instIsProbabilityMeasure [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μ i)] :
IsProbabilityMeasure (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨by simp only [Measure.pi_univ, measure_univ, Finset.prod_const_one]⟩
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure (α i))] :
IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.instIsProbabilityMeasure _
theorem pi_of_empty {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [IsEmpty α] {β : α → Type*}
{m : ∀ a, MeasurableSpace (β a)} (μ : ∀ a : α, Measure (β a)) (x : ∀ a, β a := isEmptyElim) :
Measure.pi μ = dirac x := by
haveI : ∀ a, SigmaFinite (μ a) := isEmptyElim
refine pi_eq fun s _ => ?_
rw [Fintype.prod_empty, dirac_apply_of_mem]
exact isEmptyElim (α := α)
lemma volume_pi_eq_dirac {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [IsEmpty ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ a, α a := isEmptyElim) :
(volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) = Measure.dirac x :=
Measure.pi_of_empty _ _
@[simp]
theorem pi_empty_univ {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [IsEmpty α] {β : α → Type*}
{m : ∀ α, MeasurableSpace (β α)} (μ : ∀ a : α, Measure (β a)) :
Measure.pi μ (Set.univ) = 1 := by
rw [pi_of_empty, measure_univ]
theorem pi_eval_preimage_null {i : ι} {s : Set (α i)} (hs : μ i s = 0) :
Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' s) = 0 := by
classical
-- WLOG, `s` is measurable
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs with ⟨t, hst, _, hμt⟩
suffices Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' t) = 0 from measure_mono_null (preimage_mono hst) this
-- Now rewrite it as `Set.pi`, and apply `pi_pi`
rw [← univ_pi_update_univ, pi_pi]
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ i)
simp [hμt]
theorem pi_hyperplane (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] (x : α i) :
Measure.pi μ { f : ∀ i, α i | f i = x } = 0 :=
show Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 from pi_eval_preimage_null _ (measure_singleton x)
theorem ae_eval_ne (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] (x : α i) : ∀ᵐ y : ∀ i, α i ∂Measure.pi μ, y i ≠ x :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.2 (pi_hyperplane μ i x)
theorem restrict_pi_pi (s : (i : ι) → Set (α i)) :
(Measure.pi μ).restrict (Set.univ.pi fun i ↦ s i) = .pi (fun i ↦ (μ i).restrict (s i)) := by
refine (pi_eq fun _ h ↦ ?_).symm
simp_rw [restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.univ_pi h), restrict_apply (h _),
← Set.pi_inter_distrib, pi_pi]
variable {μ}
theorem tendsto_eval_ae_ae {i : ι} : Tendsto (eval i) (ae (Measure.pi μ)) (ae (μ i)) := fun _ hs =>
pi_eval_preimage_null μ hs
theorem ae_pi_le_pi : ae (Measure.pi μ) ≤ Filter.pi fun i => ae (μ i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.le_comap
theorem ae_eq_pi {β : ι → Type*} {f f' : ∀ i, α i → β i} (h : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ i] f' i) :
(fun (x : ∀ i, α i) i => f i (x i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] fun x i => f' i (x i) :=
(eventually_all.2 fun i => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i)).mono fun _ hx => funext hx
theorem ae_le_pi {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (β i)] {f f' : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(h : ∀ i, f i ≤ᵐ[μ i] f' i) :
(fun (x : ∀ i, α i) i => f i (x i)) ≤ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] fun x i => f' i (x i) :=
(eventually_all.2 fun i => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i)).mono fun _ hx => hx
theorem ae_le_set_pi {I : Set ι} {s t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (h : ∀ i ∈ I, s i ≤ᵐ[μ i] t i) :
Set.pi I s ≤ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Set.pi I t :=
((eventually_all_finite I.toFinite).2 fun i hi => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i hi)).mono
fun _ hst hx i hi => hst i hi <| hx i hi
theorem ae_eq_set_pi {I : Set ι} {s t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (h : ∀ i ∈ I, s i =ᵐ[μ i] t i) :
Set.pi I s =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Set.pi I t :=
(ae_le_set_pi fun i hi => (h i hi).le).antisymm (ae_le_set_pi fun i hi => (h i hi).symm.le)
lemma pi_map_piCongrLeft [hι' : Fintype ι'] (e : ι ≃ ι') {β : ι' → Type*}
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (β i)] (μ : (i : ι') → Measure (β i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
(Measure.pi fun i ↦ μ (e i)).map (MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft (fun i ↦ β i) e)
= Measure.pi μ := by
let e_meas : ((b : ι) → β (e b)) ≃ᵐ ((a : ι') → β a) :=
MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft (fun i ↦ β i) e
refine Measure.pi_eq (fun s _ ↦ ?_) |>.symm
rw [e_meas.measurableEmbedding.map_apply]
let s' : (i : ι) → Set (β (e i)) := fun i ↦ s (e i)
have : e_meas ⁻¹' pi univ s = pi univ s' := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_pi, mem_univ, forall_true_left, s']
refine (e.forall_congr ?_).symm
intro i
rw [MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft_apply_apply e x i]
rw [this, pi_pi, Finset.prod_equiv e.symm]
· simp only [Finset.mem_univ, implies_true]
intro i _
simp only [s']
congr
all_goals rw [e.apply_symm_apply]
lemma pi_map_piOptionEquivProd {β : Option ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (β i)]
(μ : (i : Option ι) → Measure (β i)) [∀ (i : Option ι), SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
((Measure.pi fun i ↦ μ (some i)).prod (μ none)).map
(MeasurableEquiv.piOptionEquivProd β).symm = Measure.pi μ := by
refine pi_eq (fun s _ ↦ ?_) |>.symm
let e_meas : ((i : ι) → β (some i)) × β none ≃ᵐ ((i : Option ι) → β i) :=
MeasurableEquiv.piOptionEquivProd β |>.symm
have me := MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding e_meas
have : e_meas ⁻¹' pi univ s = (pi univ (fun i ↦ s (some i))) ×ˢ (s none) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_pi, mem_univ, forall_true_left, mem_prod]
refine ⟨by tauto, fun _ i ↦ ?_⟩
rcases i <;> tauto
simp only [e_meas, me.map_apply, univ_option, le_eq_subset, Finset.prod_insertNone, this,
prod_prod, pi_pi, mul_comm]
section Intervals
variable [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)] [∀ i, NoAtoms (μ i)]
theorem pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic {s : Set ι} {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Iio (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Iic (f i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Iio_ae_eq_Iic
theorem pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici {s : Set ι} {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioi (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Ici (f i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioi_ae_eq_Ici
theorem univ_pi_Iio_ae_eq_Iic {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Iio (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Iic f := by
rw [← pi_univ_Iic]; exact pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic
theorem univ_pi_Ioi_ae_eq_Ici {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioi (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Ici f := by
rw [← pi_univ_Ici]; exact pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici
theorem pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
theorem pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Ioc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc
theorem univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc
theorem pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc
theorem pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ico (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ico_ae_eq_Icc
theorem univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ico (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc
end Intervals
/-- If one of the measures `μ i` has no atoms, them `Measure.pi µ`
has no atoms. The instance below assumes that all `μ i` have no atoms. -/
theorem pi_noAtoms (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] : NoAtoms (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨fun x => flip measure_mono_null (pi_hyperplane μ i (x i)) (singleton_subset_iff.2 rfl)⟩
instance pi_noAtoms' [h : Nonempty ι] [∀ i, NoAtoms (μ i)] : NoAtoms (Measure.pi μ) :=
h.elim fun i => pi_noAtoms i
instance {α : ι → Type*} [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] [∀ i, NoAtoms (volume : Measure (α i))] :
NoAtoms (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi_noAtoms'
instance pi.isLocallyFiniteMeasure
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (μ i)] :
IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun x => ?_⟩
choose s hxs ho hμ using fun i => (μ i).exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top (x i)
refine ⟨pi univ s, set_pi_mem_nhds finite_univ fun i _ => IsOpen.mem_nhds (ho i) (hxs i), ?_⟩
rw [pi_pi]
exact ENNReal.prod_lt_top fun i _ => hμ i
instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))]
[∀ i, IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (X i))] :
IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, X i)) :=
pi.isLocallyFiniteMeasure
variable (μ)
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isMulLeftInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)]
[∀ i, IsMulLeftInvariant (μ i)] : IsMulLeftInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun v => (pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
rw [map_apply (measurable_const_mul _) (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs),
show (v * ·) ⁻¹' univ.pi s = univ.pi fun i => (v i * ·) ⁻¹' s i by rfl, pi_pi]
simp_rw [measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))] [∀ i, IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isMulLeftInvariant _
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isMulRightInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)]
[∀ i, IsMulRightInvariant (μ i)] : IsMulRightInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun v => (pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const _) (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs),
show (· * v) ⁻¹' univ.pi s = univ.pi fun i => (· * v i) ⁻¹' s i by rfl, pi_pi]
simp_rw [measure_preimage_mul_right]
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))]
[∀ i, IsMulRightInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsMulRightInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isMulRightInvariant _
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isInvInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableInv (α i)]
[∀ i, IsInvInvariant (μ i)] : IsInvInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨(Measure.pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
have A : Inv.inv ⁻¹' pi univ s = Set.pi univ fun i => Inv.inv ⁻¹' s i := by ext; simp
simp_rw [Measure.inv, Measure.map_apply measurable_inv (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs), A, pi_pi,
measure_preimage_inv]
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableInv (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))] [∀ i, IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isInvInvariant _
instance pi.isOpenPosMeasure [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsOpenPosMeasure (μ i)] :
IsOpenPosMeasure (MeasureTheory.Measure.pi μ) := by
constructor
rintro U U_open ⟨a, ha⟩
obtain ⟨s, ⟨hs, hsU⟩⟩ := isOpen_pi_iff'.1 U_open a ha
refine ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hsU))
simp only [pi_pi]
rw [CanonicallyOrderedAdd.prod_pos]
intro i _
apply (hs i).1.measure_pos (μ i) ⟨a i, (hs i).2⟩
instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure (X i))] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))] :
IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, X i)) :=
pi.isOpenPosMeasure _
instance pi.isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (μ i)] :
IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (MeasureTheory.Measure.pi μ) := by
constructor
intro K hK
suffices Measure.pi μ (Set.univ.pi fun j => Function.eval j '' K) < ⊤ by
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (univ.subset_pi_eval_image K)) this
rw [Measure.pi_pi]
refine WithTop.prod_lt_top ?_
exact fun i _ => IsCompact.measure_lt_top (IsCompact.image hK (continuous_apply i))
| instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))]
[∀ i, IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure (X i))] :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Pi.lean | 583 | 585 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-!
# Cantor Normal Form
The Cantor normal form of an ordinal is generally defined as its base `ω` expansion, with its
non-zero exponents in decreasing order. Here, we more generally define a base `b` expansion
`Ordinal.CNF` in this manner, which is well-behaved for any `b ≥ 2`.
# Implementation notes
We implement `Ordinal.CNF` as an association list, where keys are exponents and values are
coefficients. This is because this structure intrinsically reflects two key properties of the Cantor
normal form:
- It is ordered.
- It has finitely many entries.
# Todo
- Add API for the coefficients of the Cantor normal form.
- Prove the basic results relating the CNF to the arithmetic operations on ordinals.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open List
namespace Ordinal
/-- Inducts on the base `b` expansion of an ordinal. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def CNFRec (b : Ordinal) {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) (o : Ordinal) : C o :=
if h : o = 0 then h ▸ H0 else H o h (CNFRec b H0 H (o % b ^ log b o))
termination_by o
decreasing_by exact mod_opow_log_lt_self b h
@[simp]
theorem CNFRec_zero {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (b : Ordinal) (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) : CNFRec b H0 H 0 = H0 := by
rw [CNFRec, dif_pos rfl]
theorem CNFRec_pos (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (ho : o ≠ 0) (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) :
CNFRec b H0 H o = H o ho (@CNFRec b C H0 H _) := by
rw [CNFRec, dif_neg]
/-- The Cantor normal form of an ordinal `o` is the list of coefficients and exponents in the
base-`b` expansion of `o`.
We special-case `CNF 0 o = CNF 1 o = [(0, o)]` for `o ≠ 0`.
`CNF b (b ^ u₁ * v₁ + b ^ u₂ * v₂) = [(u₁, v₁), (u₂, v₂)]` -/
@[pp_nodot]
def CNF (b o : Ordinal) : List (Ordinal × Ordinal) :=
CNFRec b [] (fun o _ IH ↦ (log b o, o / b ^ log b o)::IH) o
@[simp]
theorem CNF_zero (b : Ordinal) : CNF b 0 = [] :=
CNFRec_zero b _ _
/-- Recursive definition for the Cantor normal form. -/
theorem CNF_ne_zero {b o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) :
CNF b o = (log b o, o / b ^ log b o)::CNF b (o % b ^ log b o) :=
CNFRec_pos b ho _ _
theorem zero_CNF {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : CNF 0 o = [(0, o)] := by simp [CNF_ne_zero ho]
theorem one_CNF {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : CNF 1 o = [(0, o)] := by simp [CNF_ne_zero ho]
theorem CNF_of_le_one {b o : Ordinal} (hb : b ≤ 1) (ho : o ≠ 0) : CNF b o = [(0, o)] := by
rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [zero_CNF ho, one_CNF ho]
theorem CNF_of_lt {b o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) (hb : o < b) : CNF b o = [(0, o)] := by
rw [CNF_ne_zero ho, log_eq_zero hb, opow_zero, div_one, mod_one, CNF_zero]
/-- Evaluating the Cantor normal form of an ordinal returns the ordinal. -/
theorem CNF_foldr (b o : Ordinal) : (CNF b o).foldr (fun p r ↦ b ^ p.1 * p.2 + r) 0 = o := by
refine CNFRec b ?_ ?_ o
· rw [CNF_zero, foldr_nil]
· intro o ho IH
rw [CNF_ne_zero ho, foldr_cons, IH, div_add_mod]
/-- Every exponent in the Cantor normal form `CNF b o` is less or equal to `log b o`. -/
theorem CNF_fst_le_log {b o : Ordinal.{u}} {x : Ordinal × Ordinal} :
x ∈ CNF b o → x.1 ≤ log b o := by
refine CNFRec b ?_ (fun o ho H ↦ ?_) o
· simp
· rw [CNF_ne_zero ho, mem_cons]
rintro (rfl | h)
· rfl
· exact (H h).trans (log_mono_right _ (mod_opow_log_lt_self b ho).le)
/-- Every coefficient in a Cantor normal form is positive. -/
theorem CNF_lt_snd {b o : Ordinal.{u}} {x : Ordinal × Ordinal} : x ∈ CNF b o → 0 < x.2 := by
refine CNFRec b (by simp) (fun o ho IH ↦ ?_) o
rw [CNF_ne_zero ho]
rintro (h | ⟨_, h⟩)
· exact div_opow_log_pos b ho
· exact IH h
/-- Every coefficient in the Cantor normal form `CNF b o` is less than `b`. -/
| theorem CNF_snd_lt {b o : Ordinal.{u}} (hb : 1 < b) {x : Ordinal × Ordinal} :
x ∈ CNF b o → x.2 < b := by
refine CNFRec b ?_ (fun o ho IH ↦ ?_) o
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/CantorNormalForm.lean | 114 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Riccardo Brasca, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Norm.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Eval
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Expand
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Primitive roots in cyclotomic fields
If `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B`, we define an element `zeta n A B : B` that is a primitive
`n`th-root of unity in `B` and we study its properties. We also prove related theorems under the
more general assumption of just being a primitive root, for reasons described in the implementation
details section.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.zeta n A B`: if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B`, than `zeta n A B`
is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `B`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.powerBasis`: if `K` and `L` are fields such that
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`, then `IsPrimitiveRoot.powerBasis`
gives a `K`-power basis for `L` given a primitive root `ζ`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.embeddingsEquivPrimitiveRoots`: the equivalence between `L →ₐ[K] A`
and `primitiveroots n A` given by the choice of `ζ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.zeta_spec`: `zeta n A B` is a primitive `n`-th root of unity.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.finrank`: if `Irreducible (cyclotomic n K)` (in particular for
`K = ℚ`), then the `finrank` of a cyclotomic extension is `n.totient`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.norm_eq_one`: if `Irreducible (cyclotomic n K)` (in particular for `K = ℚ`),
the norm of a primitive root is `1` if `n ≠ 2`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.sub_one_norm_eq_eval_cyclotomic`: if `Irreducible (cyclotomic n K)`
(in particular for `K = ℚ`), then the norm of `ζ - 1` is `eval 1 (cyclotomic n ℤ)`, for a
primitive root `ζ`. We also prove the analogous of this result for `zeta`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.norm_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two` : if
`Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) K)` (in particular for `K = ℚ`) and `p` is a prime,
then the norm of `ζ ^ (p ^ s) - 1` is `p ^ (p ^ s)` `p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2`. See the following
lemmas for similar results. We also prove the analogous of this result for `zeta`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two` : if `Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) K)`
(in particular for `K = ℚ`) and `p` is an odd prime, then the norm of `ζ - 1` is `p`. We also
prove the analogous of this result for `zeta`.
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.embeddingsEquivPrimitiveRoots`: the equivalence between `L →ₐ[K] A`
and `primitiveRoots n A` given by the choice of `ζ`.
## Implementation details
`zeta n A B` is defined as any primitive root of unity in `B`, - this must exist, by definition of
`IsCyclotomicExtension`. It is not true in general that it is a root of `cyclotomic n B`,
but this holds if `isDomain B` and `NeZero (↑n : B)`.
`zeta n A B` is defined using `Exists.choose`, which means we cannot control it.
For example, in normal mathematics, we can demand that `(zeta p ℤ ℤ[ζₚ] : ℚ(ζₚ))` is equal to
`zeta p ℚ ℚ(ζₚ)`, as we are just choosing "an arbitrary primitive root" and we can internally
specify that our choices agree. This is not the case here, and it is indeed impossible to prove that
these two are equal. Therefore, whenever possible, we prove our results for any primitive root,
and only at the "final step", when we need to provide an "explicit" primitive root, we use `zeta`.
-/
open Polynomial Algebra Finset Module IsCyclotomicExtension Nat PNat Set
open scoped IntermediateField
universe u v w z
variable {p n : ℕ+} (A : Type w) (B : Type z) (K : Type u) {L : Type v} (C : Type w)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B]
section Zeta
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
variable (n)
/-- If `B` is an `n`-th cyclotomic extension of `A`, then `zeta n A B` is a primitive root of
unity in `B`. -/
noncomputable def zeta : B :=
(exists_prim_root A <| Set.mem_singleton n : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n).choose
/-- `zeta n A B` is a primitive `n`-th root of unity. -/
@[simp]
theorem zeta_spec : IsPrimitiveRoot (zeta n A B) n :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_prim_root A (Set.mem_singleton n) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n)
theorem aeval_zeta [IsDomain B] [NeZero ((n : ℕ) : B)] :
aeval (zeta n A B) (cyclotomic n A) = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, ← IsRoot.def, map_cyclotomic, isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
exact zeta_spec n A B
|
theorem zeta_isRoot [IsDomain B] [NeZero ((n : ℕ) : B)] : IsRoot (cyclotomic n B) (zeta n A B) := by
convert aeval_zeta n A B using 0
rw [IsRoot.def, aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_cyclotomic]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/PrimitiveRoots.lean | 92 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.GroupRingAction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Invariant
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Defs
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
/-!
# Fixed field under a group action.
This is the basis of the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Given a (finite) group `G` that acts on a field `F`, we define `FixedPoints.subfield G F`,
the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every element of `G`.
This subfield is then normal and separable, and in addition if `G` acts faithfully on `F`
then `finrank (FixedPoints.subfield G F) F = Fintype.card G`.
## Main Definitions
- `FixedPoints.subfield G F`, the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every
element of `G`, where `G` is a group that acts on `F`.
-/
noncomputable section
open MulAction Finset Module
universe u v w
variable {M : Type u} [Monoid M]
variable (G : Type u) [Group G]
variable (F : Type v) [Field F] [MulSemiringAction M F] [MulSemiringAction G F] (m : M)
/-- The subfield of F fixed by the field endomorphism `m`. -/
def FixedBy.subfield : Subfield F where
carrier := fixedBy F m
zero_mem' := smul_zero m
add_mem' hx hy := (smul_add m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
neg_mem' hx := (smul_neg m _).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
one_mem' := smul_one m
mul_mem' hx hy := (smul_mul' m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
inv_mem' x hx := (smul_inv'' m x).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
section InvariantSubfields
variable (M) {F}
/-- A typeclass for subrings invariant under a `MulSemiringAction`. -/
class IsInvariantSubfield (S : Subfield F) : Prop where
smul_mem : ∀ (m : M) {x : F}, x ∈ S → m • x ∈ S
variable (S : Subfield F)
instance IsInvariantSubfield.toMulSemiringAction [IsInvariantSubfield M S] :
MulSemiringAction M S where
smul m x := ⟨m • x.1, IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem m x.2⟩
one_smul s := Subtype.eq <| one_smul M s.1
mul_smul m₁ m₂ s := Subtype.eq <| mul_smul m₁ m₂ s.1
smul_add m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_add m s₁.1 s₂.1
smul_zero m := Subtype.eq <| smul_zero m
smul_one m := Subtype.eq <| smul_one m
smul_mul m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_mul' m s₁.1 s₂.1
instance [IsInvariantSubfield M S] : IsInvariantSubring M S.toSubring where
smul_mem := IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem
end InvariantSubfields
namespace FixedPoints
variable (M)
-- we use `Subfield.copy` so that the underlying set is `fixedPoints M F`
/-- The subfield of fixed points by a monoid action. -/
def subfield : Subfield F :=
Subfield.copy (⨅ m : M, FixedBy.subfield F m) (fixedPoints M F)
(by ext z; simp [fixedPoints, FixedBy.subfield, iInf, Subfield.mem_sInf]; rfl)
instance : IsInvariantSubfield M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) where
smul_mem g x hx g' := by rw [hx, hx]
instance : SMulCommClass M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F where
smul_comm m f f' := show m • (↑f * f') = f * m • f' by rw [smul_mul', f.prop m]
instance smulCommClass' : SMulCommClass (FixedPoints.subfield M F) M F :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul (m : M) (x : FixedPoints.subfield M F) : m • x = x :=
Subtype.eq <| x.2 m
-- Why is this so slow?
@[simp]
theorem smul_polynomial (m : M) (p : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield M F)) : m • p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [Polynomial.smul_C, smul])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [smul_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [smul_mul', Polynomial.smul_C, smul, smul_pow', Polynomial.smul_X]
instance : Algebra (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F := by infer_instance
theorem coe_algebraMap :
algebraMap (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F = Subfield.subtype (FixedPoints.subfield M F) :=
rfl
theorem linearIndependent_smul_of_linearIndependent {s : Finset F} :
(LinearIndepOn (FixedPoints.subfield G F) id (s : Set F)) →
LinearIndepOn F (MulAction.toFun G F) s := by
classical
have : IsEmpty ((∅ : Finset F) : Set F) := by simp
refine Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => linearIndependent_empty_type) fun a s has ih hs => ?_
rw [coe_insert] at hs ⊢
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)] at hs
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)]; refine ⟨ih hs.1, fun ha => ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination] at ha; rcases ha with ⟨l, hl, hla⟩
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply_of_mem_supported F hl] at hla
suffices ∀ i ∈ s, l i ∈ FixedPoints.subfield G F by
replace hla := (sum_apply _ _ fun i => l i • toFun G F i).symm.trans (congr_fun hla 1)
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, toFun_apply, one_smul] at hla
refine hs.2 (hla ▸ Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c hcs => ?_)
change (⟨l c, this c hcs⟩ : FixedPoints.subfield G F) • c ∈ _
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| Submodule.subset_span <| by simpa
intro i his g
refine
eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(linearIndependent_iff'.1 (ih hs.1) s.attach (fun i => g • l i - l i) ?_ ⟨i, his⟩
(mem_attach _ _) :
_)
refine (sum_attach s fun i ↦ (g • l i - l i) • MulAction.toFun G F i).trans ?_
ext g'; dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
rw [sum_apply]
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [Pi.smul_apply, sub_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [sum_sub_distrib, Pi.zero_apply, sub_eq_zero]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext x
rw [toFun_apply, ← mul_inv_cancel_left g g', mul_smul, ← smul_mul', ← toFun_apply _ x]
show
(∑ x ∈ s, g • (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x (g⁻¹ * g')) =
∑ x ∈ s, (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x g'
rw [← smul_sum, ← sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y, ←
sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y]
rw [hla, toFun_apply, toFun_apply, smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype G] (x : F)
/-- `minpoly G F x` is the minimal polynomial of `(x : F)` over `FixedPoints.subfield G F`. -/
def minpoly : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F) :=
(prodXSubSMul G F x).toSubring (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring fun _ hc g =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := Polynomial.mem_coeffs_iff.1 hc
hn.symm ▸ prodXSubSMul.coeff G F x g n
namespace minpoly
theorem monic : (minpoly G F x).Monic := by
simp only [minpoly]
rw [Polynomial.monic_toSubring]
exact prodXSubSMul.monic G F x
theorem eval₂ :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subring.subtype <| (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring) x (minpoly G F x) =
0 := by
rw [← prodXSubSMul.eval G F x, Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp only [minpoly, Polynomial.map_toSubring]
theorem eval₂' :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F) x (minpoly G F x) = 0 :=
eval₂ G F x
theorem ne_one : minpoly G F x ≠ (1 : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F)) := fun H =>
have := eval₂ G F x
(one_ne_zero : (1 : F) ≠ 0) <| by rwa [H, Polynomial.eval₂_one] at this
theorem of_eval₂ (f : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F))
(hf : Polynomial.eval₂ (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F) x f = 0) :
minpoly G F x ∣ f := by
classical
rw [← Polynomial.map_dvd_map' (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F), minpoly,
← Subfield.toSubring_subtype_eq_subtype, Polynomial.map_toSubring _ _, prodXSubSMul]
refine
| Fintype.prod_dvd_of_coprime
(Polynomial.pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C <| MulAction.injective_ofQuotientStabilizer G x) fun y =>
QuotientGroup.induction_on y fun g => ?_
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Fixed.lean | 197 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x : Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
rcases destruct (f a) with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
rcases destruct c with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp
· simpa using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
simpa using bind_pure id s
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp only [BisimO, ret_bind]; generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· rcases destruct (g t) with b | cb <;> simp
· simpa [BisimO] using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
obtain ⟨m', h⟩ := of_results_think h1
obtain ⟨h1, e⟩ := h
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction k generalizing s with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _
<;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· simp only [think_bind, results_think_iff] at h
let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH h
rw [e']
exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h
let ⟨a, _, _, h1, h2, _⟩ := of_results_bind h
⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : s ~> a)
(h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b := fun b' bB => by
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩
rw [← h1 a's] at ba'; exact h2 ba'
instance monad : Monad Computation where
map := @map
pure := @pure
bind := @bind
instance : LawfulMonad Computation := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := @map_id)
(bind_pure_comp := @bind_pure)
(pure_bind := @ret_bind)
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : Computation α) : f <$> c = map f c :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a) : (return a : Computation α) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_pure' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> pure a = pure (f a) :=
map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (s), f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) :=
map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : Computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s := by
rw [← bind_pure]; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
rw [← bind_pure] at h
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
exact ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) [Terminates s] : Terminates (map f s) := by
rw [← bind_pure]; exact terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (α := β) (f (get s))))
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) : Terminates (map f s) ↔ Terminates s :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨_, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@Computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orElse (c₁ : Computation α) (c₂ : Unit → Computation α) : Computation α :=
@Computation.corec α (Computation α × Computation α)
(fun ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ =>
match destruct c₁ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₁' =>
match destruct c₂ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₂' => Sum.inr (c₁', c₂'))
(c₁, c₂ ())
instance instAlternativeComputation : Alternative Computation :=
{ Computation.monad with
orElse := @orElse
failure := @empty }
@[simp]
theorem ret_orElse (a : α) (c₂ : Computation α) : (pure a <|> c₂) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_pure (c₁ : Computation α) (a : α) : (think c₁ <|> pure a) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_think (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : (think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem empty_orElse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_empty (c : Computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def Equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : Prop :=
∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
/-- equivalence relation for computations -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~ " => Equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl (s : Computation α) : s ~ s := fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm {s t : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s := fun h a => (h a).symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans {s t u : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u := fun h1 h2 a =>
(h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : Computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t := fun a' =>
⟨fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h1]; exact h2, fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h2]; exact h1⟩
theorem terminates_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) : Terminates c₁ ↔ Terminates c₂ := by
simp only [terminates_iff, exists_congr h]
theorem promises_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) (a) : c₁ ~> a ↔ c₂ ~> a :=
forall_congr' fun a' => imp_congr (h a') Iff.rfl
theorem get_equiv {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) [Terminates c₁] [Terminates c₂] :
get c₁ = get c₂ :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (h _).2 <| get_mem _
theorem think_equiv (s : Computation α) : think s ~ s := fun _ => ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩
theorem thinkN_equiv (s : Computation α) (n) : thinkN s n ~ s := fun _ => thinkN_mem n
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : Computation α} {f1 f2 : α → Computation β} (h1 : s1 ~ s2)
(h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 := fun b =>
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).1 ha) ((h2 a b).1 hb),
fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).2 ha) ((h2 a b).2 hb)⟩
theorem equiv_pure_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : s ~ pure a :=
equiv_of_mem h (ret_mem _)
/-- `LiftRel R ca cb` is a generalization of `Equiv` to relations other than
equality. It asserts that if `ca` terminates with `a`, then `cb` terminates with
some `b` such that `R a b`, and if `cb` terminates with `b` then `ca` terminates
with some `a` such that `R a b`. -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) : Prop :=
(∀ {a}, a ∈ ca → ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b) ∧ ∀ {b}, b ∈ cb → ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel (swap R) cb ca ↔ LiftRel R ca cb :=
@and_comm _ _
theorem lift_eq_iff_equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : LiftRel (· = ·) c₁ c₂ ↔ c₁ ~ c₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ a =>
⟨fun a1 => by let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := h1 a1; rwa [ab],
fun a2 => by let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := h2 a2; rwa [← ab]⟩,
fun e => ⟨fun {a} a1 => ⟨a, (e _).1 a1, rfl⟩, fun {a} a2 => ⟨a, (e _).2 a2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun _ =>
⟨fun {a} as => ⟨a, as, H a⟩, fun {b} bs => ⟨b, bs, H b⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a2 =>
let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := r a2
⟨b, b1, H ab⟩,
fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l a1
⟨b, b2, H ab⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ _ ⟨l1, r1⟩ ⟨l2, r2⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨_, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1
let ⟨c, c3, bc⟩ := l2 b2
⟨c, c3, H ab bc⟩,
fun {_} c3 =>
let ⟨_, b2, bc⟩ := r2 c3
let ⟨a, a1, ab⟩ := r1 b2
⟨a, a1, H ab bc⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @LiftRel.symm _ R @symm, @LiftRel.trans _ R @trans⟩
theorem LiftRel.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) (s t) :
LiftRel R s t → LiftRel S s t
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} as =>
let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as
⟨b, bt, H ab⟩,
fun {_} bt =>
let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt
⟨a, as, H ab⟩⟩
theorem terminates_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} :
LiftRel R s t → (Terminates s ↔ Terminates t)
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, as⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨b, bt, _⟩ := l as
⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩,
fun ⟨⟨_, bt⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨a, as, _⟩ := r bt
⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩⟩
theorem rel_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
LiftRel R ca cb → ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b
| ⟨l, _⟩, a, b, ma, mb => by
let ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩ := l ma
rw [mem_unique mb mb']; exact ab'
theorem liftRel_of_mem {R : α → β → Prop} {a b ca cb} (ma : a ∈ ca) (mb : b ∈ cb) (ab : R a b) :
LiftRel R ca cb :=
⟨fun {a'} ma' => by rw [mem_unique ma' ma]; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩, fun {b'} mb' => by
rw [mem_unique mb' mb]; exact ⟨a, ma, ab⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (H : LiftRel R ca cb) {a} (h : a ∈ ca) :
∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
H.left h
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (H : LiftRel R ca cb) {b} (h : b ∈ cb) :
∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
H.right h
theorem liftRel_def {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
LiftRel R ca cb ↔ (Terminates ca ↔ Terminates cb) ∧ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨terminates_of_liftRel h, fun {a b} ma mb => by
let ⟨b', mb', ab⟩ := h.left ma
rwa [mem_unique mb mb']⟩,
fun ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} ma =>
let ⟨⟨b, mb⟩⟩ := l.1 ⟨⟨_, ma⟩⟩
⟨b, mb, r ma mb⟩,
fun {_} mb =>
let ⟨⟨a, ma⟩⟩ := l.2 ⟨⟨_, mb⟩⟩
⟨a, ma, r ma mb⟩⟩⟩
theorem liftRel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : Computation α}
{s2 : Computation β} {f1 : α → Computation γ} {f2 : β → Computation δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2)
(h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → LiftRel S (f1 a) (f2 b)) : LiftRel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
let ⟨l1, r1⟩ := h1
⟨fun {_} cB =>
let ⟨_, a1, c₁⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind cB
let ⟨_, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1
let ⟨l2, _⟩ := h2 ab
let ⟨_, d2, cd⟩ := l2 c₁
⟨_, mem_bind b2 d2, cd⟩,
fun {_} dB =>
let ⟨_, b1, d1⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind dB
let ⟨_, a2, ab⟩ := r1 b1
let ⟨_, r2⟩ := h2 ab
let ⟨_, c₂, cd⟩ := r2 d1
⟨_, mem_bind a2 c₂, cd⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_pure_left (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R (pure a) cb ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
⟨fun ⟨l, _⟩ => l (ret_mem _), fun ⟨b, mb, ab⟩ =>
⟨fun {a'} ma' => by rw [eq_of_pure_mem ma']; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩, fun {b'} mb' =>
⟨_, ret_mem _, by rw [mem_unique mb' mb]; exact ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_pure_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (b : β) :
LiftRel R ca (pure b) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b := by rw [LiftRel.swap, liftRel_pure_left]
theorem liftRel_pure (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
LiftRel R (pure a) (pure b) ↔ R a b := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R (think ca) cb ↔ LiftRel R ca cb :=
and_congr (forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ Iff.rfl)
(forall_congr' fun _ =>
imp_congr Iff.rfl <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ Iff.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R ca (think cb) ↔ LiftRel R ca cb := by
rw [← LiftRel.swap R, ← LiftRel.swap R]; apply liftRel_think_left
theorem liftRel_mem_cases {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (Ha : ∀ a ∈ ca, LiftRel R ca cb)
(Hb : ∀ b ∈ cb, LiftRel R ca cb) : LiftRel R ca cb :=
⟨fun {_} ma => (Ha _ ma).left ma, fun {_} mb => (Hb _ mb).right mb⟩
theorem liftRel_congr {R : α → β → Prop} {ca ca' : Computation α} {cb cb' : Computation β}
(ha : ca ~ ca') (hb : cb ~ cb') : LiftRel R ca cb ↔ LiftRel R ca' cb' :=
and_congr
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr (ha _) <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr (hb _) Iff.rfl)
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr (hb _) <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr (ha _) Iff.rfl)
theorem liftRel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : Computation α}
{s2 : Computation β} {f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2)
(h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b)) : LiftRel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) := by
rw [← bind_pure, ← bind_pure]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h1; simpa
theorem map_congr {s1 s2 : Computation α} {f : α → β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) : map f s1 ~ map f s2 := by
rw [← lift_eq_iff_equiv]
exact liftRel_map Eq _ ((lift_eq_iff_equiv _ _).2 h1) fun {a} b => congr_arg _
/-- Alternate definition of `LiftRel` over relations between `Computation`s -/
def LiftRelAux (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) :
α ⊕ (Computation α) → β ⊕ (Computation β) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl b => R a b
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr cb => ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b
| Sum.inr ca, Sum.inl b => ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
| Sum.inr ca, Sum.inr cb => C ca cb
variable {R : α → β → Prop} {C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop}
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inl_inl {a : α} {b : β} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inl b) = R a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inl_inr {a : α} {cb} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inr cb) = ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inr_inl {b : β} {ca} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inr ca) (Sum.inl b) = ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inr_inr {ca cb} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inr ca) (Sum.inr cb) = C ca cb :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LiftRelAux.ret_left (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) (a cb) :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (destruct cb) ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b := by
apply cb.recOn (fun b => _) fun cb => _
· intro b
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨_, ret_mem _, h⟩, fun ⟨b', mb, h⟩ => by rw [mem_unique (ret_mem _) mb]; exact h⟩
· intro
rw [destruct_think]
exact ⟨fun ⟨b, h, r⟩ => ⟨b, think_mem h, r⟩, fun ⟨b, h, r⟩ => ⟨b, of_think_mem h, r⟩⟩
theorem LiftRelAux.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) (a b) :
LiftRelAux (swap R) (swap C) b a = LiftRelAux R C a b := by
rcases a with a | ca <;> rcases b with b | cb <;> simp only [LiftRelAux]
@[simp]
theorem LiftRelAux.ret_right (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) (b ca) :
LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (Sum.inl b) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b := by
rw [← LiftRelAux.swap, LiftRelAux.ret_left]
theorem LiftRelRec.lem {R : α → β → Prop} (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb)) (ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) (a)
(ha : a ∈ ca) : LiftRel R ca cb := by
revert cb
refine memRecOn (C := (fun ca ↦ ∀ (cb : Computation β), C ca cb → LiftRel R ca cb))
ha ?_ (fun ca' IH => ?_) <;> intro cb Hc <;> have h := H Hc
· simp only [destruct_pure, LiftRelAux.ret_left] at h
simp [h]
· simp only [liftRel_think_left]
revert h
apply cb.recOn (fun b => _) fun cb' => _ <;> intros _ h
· simpa using h
· simpa [h] using IH _ h
theorem liftRel_rec {R : α → β → Prop} (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb)) (ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) :
LiftRel R ca cb :=
liftRel_mem_cases (LiftRelRec.lem C (@H) ca cb Hc) fun b hb =>
(LiftRel.swap _ _ _).2 <|
LiftRelRec.lem (swap C) (fun {_ _} h => cast (LiftRelAux.swap _ _ _ _).symm <| H h) cb ca Hc b
hb
end Computation
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 1,259 | 1,261 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Cardinalities of finite types
This file defines the cardinality `Fintype.card α` as the number of elements in `(univ : Finset α)`.
We also include some elementary results on the values of `Fintype.card` on specific types.
## Main declarations
* `Fintype.card α`: Cardinality of a fintype. Equal to `Finset.univ.card`.
* `Finite.surjective_of_injective`: an injective function from a finite type to
itself is also surjective.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function
namespace Fintype
/-- `card α` is the number of elements in `α`, defined when `α` is a fintype. -/
def card (α) [Fintype α] : ℕ :=
(@univ α _).card
theorem subtype_card {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
@card { x // p x } (Fintype.subtype s H) = #s :=
Multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
theorem card_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
[Fintype { x // p x }] : card { x // p x } = #s := by
rw [← subtype_card s H]
congr!
@[simp]
theorem card_ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@Fintype.card p (ofFinset s H) = #s :=
Fintype.subtype_card s H
theorem card_of_finset' {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) [Fintype p] :
Fintype.card p = #s := by rw [← card_ofFinset s H]; congr!
end Fintype
namespace Fintype
theorem ofEquiv_card [Fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : @card β (ofEquiv α f) = card α :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
theorem card_congr {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (f : α ≃ β) : card α = card β := by
rw [← ofEquiv_card f]; congr!
@[congr]
theorem card_congr' {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (h : α = β) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (by rw [h])
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofSubsingleton`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use either `Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton` or
`Fintype.card_unique`. -/
theorem card_ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : @Fintype.card _ (ofSubsingleton a) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Unique α] [h : Fintype α] : Fintype.card α = 1 :=
Subsingleton.elim (ofSubsingleton default) h ▸ card_ofSubsingleton _
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofIsEmpty`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use `Fintype.card_eq_zero`. -/
theorem card_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : @Fintype.card α Fintype.ofIsEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
end Fintype
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
-- We use an arbitrary `[Fintype s]` instance here,
-- not necessarily coming from a `[Fintype α]`.
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_card {α : Type*} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinset.card = Fintype.card s :=
Multiset.card_map Subtype.val Finset.univ.val
end Set
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_univ [Fintype α] : #(univ : Finset α) = Fintype.card α := rfl
theorem Finset.eq_univ_of_card [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) (hs : #s = Fintype.card α) :
s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _) <| by rw [hs, Finset.card_univ]
theorem Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = univ :=
⟨s.eq_univ_of_card, by
rintro rfl
exact Finset.card_univ⟩
theorem Finset.card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
card_le_card (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem [Fintype α] {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hx : x ∉ s) :
#s < Fintype.card α :=
card_lt_card ⟨subset_univ s, not_forall.2 ⟨x, fun hx' => hx (hx' <| mem_univ x)⟩⟩
theorem Finset.card_lt_iff_ne_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s < Fintype.card α ↔ s ≠ Finset.univ :=
s.card_le_univ.lt_iff_ne.trans (not_congr s.card_eq_iff_eq_univ)
theorem Finset.card_compl_lt_iff_nonempty [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ < Fintype.card α ↔ s.Nonempty :=
sᶜ.card_lt_iff_ne_univ.trans s.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty
theorem Finset.card_univ_diff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#(univ \ s) = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_sdiff (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #sᶜ = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_univ_diff s
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_add_card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s + #sᶜ = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Finset.card_compl, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (card_le_univ s), Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_compl_add_card [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ + #s = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_add_card_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_compl_set [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype (↥sᶜ : Sort _)] :
Fintype.card (↥sᶜ : Sort _) = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card s := by
classical rw [← Set.toFinset_card, ← Set.toFinset_card, ← Finset.card_compl, Set.toFinset_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq (y : α) [Fintype { x // x = y }] :
Fintype.card { x // x = y } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq' (y : α) [Fintype { x // y = x }] :
Fintype.card { x // y = x } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_empty : Fintype.card Empty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_pempty : Fintype.card PEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_unit : Fintype.card Unit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_punit : Fintype.card PUnit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_bool : Fintype.card Bool = 2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_ulift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (ULift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_plift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (PLift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_orderDual (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card αᵒᵈ = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_lex (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (Lex α) = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
-- Note: The extra hypothesis `h` is there so that the rewrite lemma applies,
-- no matter what instance of `Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)` is used.
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_setUniv [Fintype α] {h : Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)} :
Fintype.card (Set.univ : Set α) = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_true [Fintype α] {h : Fintype {_a : α // True}} :
@Fintype.card {_a // True} h = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_subtype
simp
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inl` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `α` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumLeft {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) Sum.inl_injective
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inr` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `β` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumRight {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype β :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) Sum.inr_injective
theorem Finite.exists_univ_list (α) [Finite α] : ∃ l : List α, l.Nodup ∧ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨l, e⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep (@univ α _).1
have := And.intro (@univ α _).2 (@mem_univ_val α _)
exact ⟨_, by rwa [← e] at this⟩
theorem List.Nodup.length_le_card {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) :
l.length ≤ Fintype.card α := by
classical exact List.toFinset_card_of_nodup h ▸ l.toFinset.card_le_univ
namespace Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
theorem card_le_of_injective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : card α ≤ card β :=
Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn f (fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem card_le_of_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : card α ≤ card β :=
card_le_of_injective f f.2
theorem card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f) {b : β}
(w : b ∉ Set.range f) : card α < card β :=
calc
card α = (univ.map ⟨f, h⟩).card := (card_map _).symm
_ < card β :=
Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem (x := b) <| by
rwa [← mem_coe, coe_map, coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
theorem card_lt_of_injective_not_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f)
(h' : ¬Function.Surjective f) : card α < card β :=
let ⟨_y, hy⟩ := not_forall.1 h'
card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem f h hy
theorem card_le_of_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Surjective f) : card β ≤ card α :=
card_le_of_injective _ (Function.injective_surjInv h)
theorem card_range_le {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) [Fintype α] [Fintype (Set.range f)] :
Fintype.card (Set.range f) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective (fun a => ⟨f a, by simp⟩) fun ⟨_, a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, by simpa using ha⟩
theorem card_range {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [EmbeddingLike F α β] (f : F) [Fintype α]
[Fintype (Set.range f)] : Fintype.card (Set.range f) = Fintype.card α :=
Eq.symm <| Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.ofInjective _ <| EmbeddingLike.injective f
theorem card_eq_zero_iff : card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
rw [card, Finset.card_eq_zero, univ_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero [IsEmpty α] : card α = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
alias card_of_isEmpty := card_eq_zero
/-- A `Fintype` with cardinality zero is equivalent to `Empty`. -/
def cardEqZeroEquivEquivEmpty : card α = 0 ≃ (α ≃ Empty) :=
(Equiv.ofIff card_eq_zero_iff).trans (Equiv.equivEmptyEquiv α).symm
theorem card_pos_iff : 0 < card α ↔ Nonempty α :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_iff_comm.mp <| not_nonempty_iff.trans card_eq_zero_iff.symm
theorem card_pos [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < card α :=
card_pos_iff.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_ne_zero [Nonempty α] : card α ≠ 0 :=
_root_.ne_of_gt card_pos
instance [Nonempty α] : NeZero (card α) := ⟨card_ne_zero⟩
theorem existsUnique_iff_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(∃! a : α, p a) ↔ #{x | p x} = 1 := by
rw [Finset.card_eq_one]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
simp only [forall_true_left, Subset.antisymm_iff, subset_singleton_iff', singleton_subset_iff,
true_and, and_comm, mem_univ, mem_filter]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_iff_card_one := existsUnique_iff_card_one
nonrec theorem two_lt_card_iff : 2 < card α ↔ ∃ a b c : α, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
simp_rw [← Finset.card_univ, two_lt_card_iff, mem_univ, true_and]
theorem card_of_bijective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Fintype
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem surjective_of_injective {f : α → α} (hinj : Injective f) : Surjective f := by
intro x
have := Classical.propDecidable
cases nonempty_fintype α
have h₁ : image f univ = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _)
((card_image_of_injective univ hinj).symm ▸ le_rfl)
have h₂ : x ∈ image f univ := h₁.symm ▸ mem_univ x
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_image.1 h₂
exact ⟨y, h.2⟩
theorem injective_iff_surjective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨surjective_of_injective, fun hsurj =>
HasLeftInverse.injective ⟨surjInv hsurj, leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse
(surjective_of_injective (injective_surjInv _))
(rightInverse_surjInv _)⟩⟩
theorem injective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem surjective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Surjective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv {f : α → β} (e : α ≃ β) : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
have : Injective (e.symm ∘ f) ↔ Surjective (e.symm ∘ f) := injective_iff_surjective
⟨fun hinj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.surjective.comp (this.1 (e.symm.injective.comp hinj)),
fun hsurj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.injective.comp (this.2 (e.symm.surjective.comp hsurj))⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := injective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := surjective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.surjective_of_fintype,
_root_.Function.Surjective.injective_of_fintype⟩ :=
injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv
end Finite
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_coe (s : Finset α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = #s :=
@Fintype.card_of_finset' _ _ _ (fun _ => Iff.rfl) (id _)
/-- We can inflate a set `s` to any bigger size. -/
lemma Finset.exists_superset_card_eq [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} (hsn : #s ≤ n)
(hnα : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ #t = n := by simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.subset_univ hsn hnα
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_prop : Fintype.card Prop = 2 :=
rfl
theorem set_fintype_card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype s)
theorem set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = Set.univ := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ, ← Set.toFinset_univ, Set.toFinset_inj]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_le [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
lemma Fintype.card_subtype_lt [Fintype α] {p : α → Prop} [Fintype {a // p a}] {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) :
Fintype.card { x // p x } < Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (b := x) (↑) Subtype.coe_injective <| by
rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } = #{x | p x} := by
refine Fintype.card_of_subtype _ ?_
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_compl [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card { x // p x } := by
classical
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype (Set.toFinset { x | p x }ᶜ), Set.toFinset_compl,
Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_of_subtype] <;>
· intro
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_mono (p q : α → Prop) (h : p ≤ q) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // q x }] : Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card { x // q x } :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ h)
/-- If two subtypes of a fintype have equal cardinality, so do their complements. -/
theorem Fintype.card_compl_eq_card_compl [Finite α] (p q : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] [Fintype { x // q x }] [Fintype { x // ¬q x }]
(h : Fintype.card { x // p x } = Fintype.card { x // q x }) :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card { x // ¬q x } := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
simp only [Fintype.card_subtype_compl, h]
theorem Fintype.card_quotient_le [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α)
[DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] : Fintype.card (Quotient s) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ Quotient.mk'_surjective
theorem univ_eq_singleton_of_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (x : α) (h : Fintype.card α = 1) :
(univ : Finset α) = {x} := by
symm
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ {x})
apply le_of_eq
simp [h, Finset.card_univ]
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] [IsIrrefl α r] :
WellFounded r := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
have (x y) (hxy : r x y) : #{z | r z x} < #{z | r z y} :=
Finset.card_lt_card <| by
simp only [Finset.lt_iff_ssubset.symm, lt_iff_le_not_le, Finset.le_iff_subset,
Finset.subset_iff, mem_filter, true_and, mem_univ, hxy]
exact
⟨fun z hzx => _root_.trans hzx hxy,
not_forall_of_exists_not ⟨x, Classical.not_imp.2 ⟨hxy, irrefl x⟩⟩⟩
exact Subrelation.wf (this _ _) (measure _).wf
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedLT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedLT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedGT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedGT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
end Finite
-- Shortcut instances to make sure those are found even in the presence of other instances
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/WellFoundedLT.20Prop.20is.20not.20found.20when.20importing.20too.20much
instance Bool.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Bool := inferInstance
instance Bool.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Bool := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Prop := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Prop := inferInstance
section Trunc
/-- A `Fintype` with positive cardinality constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfCardPos {α} [Fintype α] (h : 0 < Fintype.card α) : Trunc α :=
letI := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp h
truncOfNonemptyFintype α
end Trunc
/-- A custom induction principle for fintypes. The base case is a subsingleton type,
and the induction step is for non-trivial types, and one can assume the hypothesis for
smaller types (via `Fintype.card`).
The major premise is `Fintype α`, so to use this with the `induction` tactic you have to give a name
to that instance and use that name.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Fintype.induction_subsingleton_or_nontrivial {P : ∀ (α) [Fintype α], Prop} (α : Type*)
[Fintype α] (hbase : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Subsingleton α], P α)
(hstep : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Nontrivial α],
(∀ (β) [Fintype β], Fintype.card β < Fintype.card α → P β) → P α) :
P α := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, Fintype.card α = n := ⟨Fintype.card α, rfl⟩
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih generalizing α
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with hsing | hnontriv
· apply hbase
· apply hstep
intro β _ hlt
rw [hn] at hlt
exact ih (Fintype.card β) hlt _ rfl
section Fin
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_fin (n : ℕ) : Fintype.card (Fin n) = n :=
List.length_finRange
theorem Fintype.card_fin_lt_of_le {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
Fintype.card {i : Fin n // i < m} = m := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Fintype.card_fin m]
apply Fintype.card_congr
exact { toFun := fun ⟨⟨i, _⟩, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi⟩
invFun := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hi h⟩, hi⟩
left_inv := fun i ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun i ↦ rfl }
theorem Finset.card_fin (n : ℕ) : #(univ : Finset (Fin n)) = n := by simp
/-- `Fin` as a map from `ℕ` to `Type` is injective. Note that since this is a statement about
equality of types, using it should be avoided if possible. -/
theorem fin_injective : Function.Injective Fin := fun m n h =>
(Fintype.card_fin m).symm.trans <| (Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.cast h).trans (Fintype.card_fin n)
theorem Fin.val_eq_val_of_heq {k l : ℕ} {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} (h : HEq i j) :
(i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) :=
(Fin.heq_ext_iff (fin_injective (type_eq_of_heq h))).1 h
/-- A reversed version of `Fin.cast_eq_cast` that is easier to rewrite with. -/
theorem Fin.cast_eq_cast' {n m : ℕ} (h : Fin n = Fin m) :
_root_.cast h = Fin.cast (fin_injective h) := by
cases fin_injective h
rfl
theorem card_finset_fin_le {n : ℕ} (s : Finset (Fin n)) : #s ≤ n := by
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using s.card_le_univ
end Fin
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Card.lean | 537 | 538 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
/-!
# Essentially small categories.
A category given by `(C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]` is `w`-essentially small
if there exists a `SmallModel C : Type w` equipped with `[SmallCategory (SmallModel C)]` and an
equivalence `C ≌ SmallModel C`.
A category is `w`-locally small if every hom type is `w`-small.
The main theorem here is that a category is `w`-essentially small iff
the type `Skeleton C` is `w`-small, and `C` is `w`-locally small.
-/
universe w w' v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A category is `EssentiallySmall.{w}` if there exists
an equivalence to some `S : Type w` with `[SmallCategory S]`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
class EssentiallySmall (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- An essentially small category is equivalent to some small category. -/
equiv_smallCategory : ∃ (S : Type w) (_ : SmallCategory S), Nonempty (C ≌ S)
/-- Constructor for `EssentiallySmall C` from an explicit small category witness. -/
theorem EssentiallySmall.mk' {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {S : Type w} [SmallCategory S]
(e : C ≌ S) : EssentiallySmall.{w} C :=
⟨⟨S, _, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩
/-- An arbitrarily chosen small model for an essentially small category.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
def SmallModel (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [EssentiallySmall.{w} C] : Type w :=
Classical.choose (@EssentiallySmall.equiv_smallCategory C _ _)
noncomputable instance smallCategorySmallModel (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
[EssentiallySmall.{w} C] : SmallCategory (SmallModel C) :=
Classical.choose (Classical.choose_spec (@EssentiallySmall.equiv_smallCategory C _ _))
/-- The (noncomputable) categorical equivalence between
an essentially small category and its small model.
-/
noncomputable def equivSmallModel (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [EssentiallySmall.{w} C] :
C ≌ SmallModel C :=
Nonempty.some
(Classical.choose_spec (Classical.choose_spec (@EssentiallySmall.equiv_smallCategory C _ _)))
instance (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [EssentiallySmall.{w} C] : EssentiallySmall.{w} Cᵒᵖ :=
EssentiallySmall.mk' (equivSmallModel C).op
theorem essentiallySmall_congr {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
(e : C ≌ D) : EssentiallySmall.{w} C ↔ EssentiallySmall.{w} D := by
fconstructor
· rintro ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨f⟩⟩
exact EssentiallySmall.mk' (e.symm.trans f)
· rintro ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨f⟩⟩
exact EssentiallySmall.mk' (e.trans f)
theorem Discrete.essentiallySmallOfSmall {α : Type u} [Small.{w} α] :
EssentiallySmall.{w} (Discrete α) :=
⟨⟨Discrete (Shrink α), ⟨inferInstance, ⟨Discrete.equivalence (equivShrink _)⟩⟩⟩⟩
theorem essentiallySmallSelf : EssentiallySmall.{max w v u} C :=
EssentiallySmall.mk' (AsSmall.equiv : C ≌ AsSmall.{w} C)
/-- A category is `w`-locally small if every hom set is `w`-small.
See `ShrinkHoms C` for a category instance where every hom set has been replaced by a small model.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class LocallySmall (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- A locally small category has small hom-types. -/
hom_small : ∀ X Y : C, Small.{w} (X ⟶ Y) := by infer_instance
instance (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [LocallySmall.{w} C] (X Y : C) : Small.{w, v} (X ⟶ Y) :=
LocallySmall.hom_small X Y
instance (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [LocallySmall.{w} C] : LocallySmall.{w} Cᵒᵖ where
hom_small X Y := small_of_injective (opEquiv X Y).injective
theorem locallySmall_of_faithful {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Faithful] [LocallySmall.{w} D] : LocallySmall.{w} C where
hom_small {_ _} := small_of_injective F.map_injective
theorem locallySmall_congr {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
(e : C ≌ D) : LocallySmall.{w} C ↔ LocallySmall.{w} D :=
⟨fun _ => locallySmall_of_faithful e.inverse, fun _ => locallySmall_of_faithful e.functor⟩
instance (priority := 100) locallySmall_self (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] :
LocallySmall.{v} C where
instance (priority := 100) locallySmall_of_univLE (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [UnivLE.{v, w}] :
LocallySmall.{w} C where
theorem locallySmall_max {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] : LocallySmall.{max v w} C where
hom_small _ _ := small_max.{w} _
instance (priority := 100) locallySmall_of_essentiallySmall (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
[EssentiallySmall.{w} C] : LocallySmall.{w} C :=
(locallySmall_congr (equivSmallModel C)).mpr (CategoryTheory.locallySmall_self _)
/-- We define a type alias `ShrinkHoms C` for `C`. When we have `LocallySmall.{w} C`,
we'll put a `Category.{w}` instance on `ShrinkHoms C`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ShrinkHoms (C : Type u) :=
C
namespace ShrinkHoms
section
variable {C' : Type*}
-- a fresh variable with no category instance attached
/-- Help the typechecker by explicitly translating from `C` to `ShrinkHoms C`. -/
def toShrinkHoms {C' : Type*} (X : C') : ShrinkHoms C' :=
X
/-- Help the typechecker by explicitly translating from `ShrinkHoms C` to `C`. -/
def fromShrinkHoms {C' : Type*} (X : ShrinkHoms C') : C' :=
X
@[simp]
theorem to_from (X : C') : fromShrinkHoms (toShrinkHoms X) = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem from_to (X : ShrinkHoms C') : toShrinkHoms (fromShrinkHoms X) = X :=
rfl
end
variable [LocallySmall.{w} C]
@[simps]
noncomputable instance : Category.{w} (ShrinkHoms C) where
Hom X Y := Shrink (fromShrinkHoms X ⟶ fromShrinkHoms Y)
id X := equivShrink _ (𝟙 (fromShrinkHoms X))
comp f g := equivShrink _ ((equivShrink _).symm f ≫ (equivShrink _).symm g)
/-- Implementation of `ShrinkHoms.equivalence`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def functor : C ⥤ ShrinkHoms C where
obj X := toShrinkHoms X
map {X Y} f := equivShrink (X ⟶ Y) f
/-- Implementation of `ShrinkHoms.equivalence`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def inverse : ShrinkHoms C ⥤ C where
obj X := fromShrinkHoms X
map {X Y} f := (equivShrink (fromShrinkHoms X ⟶ fromShrinkHoms Y)).symm f
/-- The categorical equivalence between `C` and `ShrinkHoms C`, when `C` is locally small.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def equivalence : C ≌ ShrinkHoms C where
functor := functor C
inverse := inverse C
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
instance : (functor C).IsEquivalence := (equivalence C).isEquivalence_functor
instance : (inverse C).IsEquivalence := (equivalence C).isEquivalence_inverse
end ShrinkHoms
namespace Shrink
noncomputable instance [Small.{w} C] : Category.{v} (Shrink.{w} C) :=
InducedCategory.category (equivShrink C).symm
/-- The categorical equivalence between `C` and `Shrink C`, when `C` is small. -/
noncomputable def equivalence [Small.{w} C] : C ≌ Shrink.{w} C :=
(Equivalence.induced _).symm
instance [Small.{w'} C] [LocallySmall.{w} C] :
LocallySmall.{w} (Shrink.{w'} C) :=
locallySmall_of_faithful.{w} (equivalence.{w'} C).inverse
end Shrink
/-- A category is essentially small if and only if
the underlying type of its skeleton (i.e. the "set" of isomorphism classes) is small,
and it is locally small.
-/
theorem essentiallySmall_iff (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] :
EssentiallySmall.{w} C ↔ Small.{w} (Skeleton C) ∧ LocallySmall.{w} C := by
-- This theorem is the only bit of real work in this file.
fconstructor
· intro h
fconstructor
· rcases h with ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨e⟩⟩
refine ⟨⟨Skeleton S, ⟨?_⟩⟩⟩
exact e.skeletonEquiv
| · infer_instance
· rintro ⟨⟨S, ⟨e⟩⟩, L⟩
let e' := (ShrinkHoms.equivalence C).skeletonEquiv.symm
letI : Category S := InducedCategory.category (e'.trans e).symm
refine ⟨⟨S, this, ⟨?_⟩⟩⟩
refine (ShrinkHoms.equivalence C).trans <|
(skeletonEquivalence (ShrinkHoms C)).symm.trans
((inducedFunctor (e'.trans e).symm).asEquivalence.symm)
theorem essentiallySmall_of_small_of_locallySmall [Small.{w} C] [LocallySmall.{w} C] :
EssentiallySmall.{w} C :=
(essentiallySmall_iff C).2 ⟨small_of_surjective Quotient.exists_rep, by infer_instance⟩
section FullSubcategory
instance locallySmall_fullSubcategory [LocallySmall.{w} C] (P : ObjectProperty C) :
LocallySmall.{w} P.FullSubcategory :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/EssentiallySmall.lean | 212 | 228 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Continuous
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Dual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfLIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ring
/-! # From equality of integrals to equality of functions
This file provides various statements of the general form "if two functions have the same integral
on all sets, then they are equal almost everywhere".
The different lemmas use various hypotheses on the class of functions, on the target space or on the
possible finiteness of the measure.
This file is about Bochner integrals. See the file `AEEqOfLIntegral` for Lebesgue integrals.
## Main statements
All results listed below apply to two functions `f, g`, together with two main hypotheses,
* `f` and `g` are integrable on all measurable sets with finite measure,
* for all measurable sets `s` with finite measure, `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ`.
The conclusion is then `f =ᵐ[μ] g`. The main lemmas are:
* `ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite`: case of a sigma-finite measure.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for functions which are
`AEFinStronglyMeasurable`.
* `Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for elements of `Lp`, for `0 < p < ∞`.
* `Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for integrable functions.
For each of these results, we also provide a lemma about the equality of one function and 0. For
example, `Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero`.
Generally useful lemmas which are not related to integrals:
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner`: if for all constants `c`, `fun x => inner c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then
`f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual`: if for all constants `c` in the dual space,
`fun x => c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then `f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
-/
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace NormedSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
section AeEqOfForall
variable {α E 𝕜 : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [RCLike 𝕜]
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : E, (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let s := denseSeq E
have hs : DenseRange s := denseRange_denseSeq E
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, inner (s n) (f x) = (0 : 𝕜) := ae_all_iff.mpr fun n => hf (s n)
refine hf'.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have h_closed : IsClosed {c : E | inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)} :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.inner continuous_const) continuous_const
exact @isClosed_property ℕ E _ s (fun c => inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)) hs h_closed hx _
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => y x
variable (𝕜)
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{t : Set E} (ht : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) {f : α → E}
(hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) (h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
| rcases ht with ⟨d, d_count, hd⟩
haveI : Encodable d := d_count.toEncodable
have : ∀ x : d, ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ‖g‖ ≤ 1 ∧ g x = ‖(x : E)‖ :=
fun x => exists_dual_vector'' 𝕜 (x : E)
choose s hs using this
have A : ∀ a : E, a ∈ t → (∀ x, ⟪a, s x⟫ = (0 : 𝕜)) → a = 0 := by
intro a hat ha
contrapose! ha
have a_pos : 0 < ‖a‖ := by simp only [ha, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
have a_mem : a ∈ closure d := hd hat
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : d, dist a x < ‖a‖ / 2 := by
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 a_mem (‖a‖ / 2) (half_pos a_pos) with ⟨x, h'x, hx⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h'x⟩, hx⟩
use x
have I : ‖a‖ / 2 < ‖(x : E)‖ := by
have : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖(x : E)‖ + ‖a - x‖ := norm_le_insert' _ _
have : ‖a - x‖ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rwa [dist_eq_norm] at hx
linarith
intro h
apply lt_irrefl ‖s x x‖
calc
‖s x x‖ = ‖s x (x - a)‖ := by simp only [h, sub_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_sub]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖(x : E) - a‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (hs x).1 _
_ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rw [one_mul]; rwa [dist_eq_norm'] at hx
_ < ‖(x : E)‖ := I
_ = ‖s x x‖ := by rw [(hs x).2, RCLike.norm_coe_norm]
have hfs : ∀ y : d, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := fun y => hf (s y)
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ y : d, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := by rwa [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [hf', h't] with x hx h'x
exact A (f x) h'x hx
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqOfIntegral.lean | 75 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 François Sunatori. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: François Sunatori
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Basic
/-!
# Isometries of the Complex Plane
The lemma `linear_isometry_complex` states the classification of isometries in the complex plane.
Specifically, isometries with rotations but without translation.
The proof involves:
1. creating a linear isometry `g` with two fixed points, `g(0) = 0`, `g(1) = 1`
2. applying `linear_isometry_complex_aux` to `g`
The proof of `linear_isometry_complex_aux` is separated in the following parts:
1. show that the real parts match up: `LinearIsometry.re_apply_eq_re`
2. show that I maps to either I or -I
3. every z is a linear combination of a + b * I
## References
* [Isometries of the Complex Plane](http://helmut.knaust.info/mediawiki/images/b/b5/Iso.pdf)
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex
open CharZero
open ComplexConjugate
local notation "|" x "|" => Complex.abs x
/-- An element of the unit circle defines a `LinearIsometryEquiv` from `ℂ` to itself, by
rotation. -/
def rotation : Circle →* ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ where
toFun a :=
{ DistribMulAction.toLinearEquiv ℝ ℂ a with
norm_map' x := show ‖a * x‖ = ‖x‖ by
rw [norm_mul, Circle.norm_coe, one_mul] }
map_one' := LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| by simp
map_mul' a b := LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| mul_smul a b
@[simp]
theorem rotation_apply (a : Circle) (z : ℂ) : rotation a z = a * z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (a : Circle) : (rotation a).symm = rotation a⁻¹ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (a b : Circle) : (rotation a).trans (rotation b) = rotation (b * a) := by
ext1
| simp
theorem rotation_ne_conjLIE (a : Circle) : rotation a ≠ conjLIE := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Isometry.lean | 60 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :
Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace IsCauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] {f g : ℕ → β}
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
--@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := by
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij k ik => ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) ?_)
rw [abv_sub abv]; exact hi _ ik
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0
⟨i, fun _ ij _ jk => H _ (le_trans ij jk) _ ij⟩
lemma bounded (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := by
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hf _ zero_lt_one
set R : ℕ → α := @Nat.rec (fun _ => α) (abv (f 0)) fun i c => max c (abv (f i.succ)) with hR
have : ∀ i, ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R i := by
refine Nat.rec (by simp [hR]) ?_
rintro i hi j (rfl | hj)
· simp [R]
· exact (hi j hj).trans (le_max_left _ _)
refine ⟨R i + 1, fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain hji | hij := le_total j i
· exact (this i _ hji).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· simpa using (abv_add abv _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this i _ le_rfl) (h _ hij)
lemma bounded' (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := hf.bounded
⟨max r (x + 1), (lt_add_one x).trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
fun i ↦ (h i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩
lemma const (x : β) : IsCauSeq abv fun _ ↦ x :=
fun ε ε0 ↦ ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero] using ε0⟩
theorem add (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f + g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
lemma mul (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f * g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, _, hF⟩ := hf.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, _, hG⟩ := hg.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun j ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
@[simp] lemma _root_.isCauSeq_neg : IsCauSeq abv (-f) ↔ IsCauSeq abv f := by
simp only [IsCauSeq, Pi.neg_apply, ← neg_sub', abv_neg]
protected alias ⟨of_neg, neg⟩ := isCauSeq_neg
end IsCauSeq
/-- `CauSeq β abv` is the type of `β`-valued Cauchy sequences, with respect to the absolute value
function `abv`. -/
def CauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) : Type _ :=
{ f : ℕ → β // IsCauSeq abv f }
namespace CauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section Ring
variable [Ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : CoeFun (CauSeq β abv) fun _ => ℕ → β :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g := Subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem isCauSeq (f : CauSeq β abv) : IsCauSeq abv f :=
f.2
theorem cauchy (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∀ {ε}, 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := @f.2
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f`, create a Cauchy sequence from a sequence `g` with
the same values as `f`. -/
def ofEq (f : CauSeq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨g, fun ε => by rw [show g = f from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} :
0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} : 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded
theorem bounded' (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded' x
instance : Add (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f + g) = (f : ℕ → β) + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem add_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i :=
rfl
variable (abv) in
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : CauSeq β abv := ⟨fun _ ↦ x, IsCauSeq.const _⟩
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_const (x : β) : (const x : ℕ → β) = Function.const ℕ x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x :=
rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : CauSeq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => congr_arg (fun f : CauSeq β abv => (f : ℕ → β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : CauSeq β abv) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CauSeq β abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : CauSeq β abv) i = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : CauSeq β abv) i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_zero : const 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_one : const 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
rfl
instance : Mul (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f g ↦ ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f * g) = (f : ℕ → β) * g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i :=
rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
rfl
instance : Neg (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f ↦ ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem neg_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i :=
rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ofEq (f + -g) (fun x => f x - g x) fun i => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f - g) = (f : ℕ → β) - g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i :=
rfl
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β]
instance : SMul G (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f => (ofEq (const (a • (1 : β)) * f) (a • (f : ℕ → β))) fun _ => smul_one_mul _ _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(a • f) = a • (f : ℕ → β) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem smul_apply (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (a • f) i = a • f i :=
rfl
theorem const_smul (a : G) (x : β) : const (a • x) = a • const x :=
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower G (CauSeq β abv) (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f g => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc a (f : ℕ → β) (g : ℕ → β)⟩
end SMul
instance addGroup : AddGroup (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instNatCast : NatCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroupWithOne Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl
coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
instance : Pow (CauSeq β abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n =>
(ofEq (npowRec n f) fun i => f i ^ n) <| by induction n <;> simp [*, npowRec, pow_succ]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (f : CauSeq β abv) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (f : ℕ → β) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pow_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (n i : ℕ) : (f ^ n) i = f i ^ n :=
rfl
theorem const_pow (x : β) (n : ℕ) : const (x ^ n) = const x ^ n :=
rfl
instance ring : Ring (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.ring Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl coe_add coe_mul coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) coe_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] : CommRing (CauSeq β abv) :=
{ CauSeq.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b => ext fun n => by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- `LimZero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def LimZero {abv : β → α} (f : CauSeq β abv) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f + g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ <| half_pos ε0) (hg _ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_limZero_right (f : CauSeq β abv) {g} (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 F0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt <| hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem mul_limZero_left {f} (g : CauSeq β abv) (hg : LimZero f) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 G0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _)
rwa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem neg_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) : LimZero (-f) := by
rw [← neg_one_mul f]
exact mul_limZero_right _ hf
theorem sub_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f - g) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_limZero hf (neg_limZero hg)
theorem limZero_sub_rev {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hfg : LimZero (f - g)) : LimZero (g - f) := by
simpa using neg_limZero hfg
theorem zero_limZero : LimZero (0 : CauSeq β abv)
| ε, ε0 => ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_limZero {x : β} : LimZero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun H =>
(abv_eq_zero abv).1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _)) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, hi⟩ := H _ ε0
le_of_lt <| hi _ le_rfl,
fun e => e.symm ▸ zero_limZero⟩
instance equiv : Setoid (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => LimZero (f - g),
⟨fun f => by simp [zero_limZero],
fun f ε hε => by simpa using neg_limZero f ε hε,
fun fg gh => by simpa using add_limZero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem add_equiv_add {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 + g1 ≈ f2 + g2 := by simpa only [← add_sub_add_comm] using add_limZero hf hg
theorem neg_equiv_neg {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f ≈ g) : -f ≈ -g := by
simpa only [neg_sub'] using neg_limZero hf
theorem sub_equiv_sub {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 - g1 ≈ f2 - g2 := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_equiv_add hf (neg_equiv_neg hg)
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ <| half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij k jk => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk))
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem limZero_congr {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : LimZero f ↔ LimZero g :=
⟨fun l => by simpa using add_limZero (Setoid.symm h) l, fun l => by simpa using add_limZero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
by_contra nk
refine hf fun ε ε0 => ?_
simp? [not_forall] at nk says
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ge_iff_le, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp,
not_le] at nk
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0)
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩
refine ⟨j, fun k jk => ?_⟩
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj)
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : CauSeq β abv) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) :
IsCauSeq abv f
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (h _ (half_pos <| half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)
⟨i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl; rw [abv_sub abv] at h₁
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁)
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij))
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this⟩
theorem not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ¬LimZero f := by
intro h
have : LimZero (f - 0) := by simp [h]
exact hf this
theorem mul_equiv_zero (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (g * f) := mul_limZero_right _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (g * f - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_equiv_zero' (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (f * g) := mul_limZero_left _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (f * g - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : ¬f * g ≈ 0 :=
fun (this : LimZero (f * g - 0)) => by
have hlz : LimZero (f * g) := by simpa
have hf' : ¬LimZero f := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (f - 0) from hf
have hg' : ¬LimZero g := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (g - 0) from hg
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩
have : 0 < a1 * a2 := mul_pos ha1 ha2
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hlz _ this
let i := max N (max N1 N2)
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _)
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
apply not_le_of_lt hN'
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _)
rw [abv_mul abv]
gcongr
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show LimZero _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_limZero, sub_eq_zero]
theorem mul_equiv_mul {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 * g1 ≈ f2 * g2 := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
using add_limZero (mul_limZero_left g1 hf) (mul_limZero_right f2 hg)
theorem smul_equiv_smul {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β] {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (c : G)
(hf : f1 ≈ f2) : c • f1 ≈ c • f2 := by
simpa [const_smul, smul_one_mul _ _] using
mul_equiv_mul (const_equiv.mpr <| Eq.refl <| c • (1 : β)) hf
theorem pow_equiv_pow {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (n : ℕ) : f1 ^ n ≈ f2 ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, Setoid.refl]
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ'] using mul_equiv_mul hf ih
end Ring
section IsDomain
variable [Ring β] [IsDomain β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem one_not_equiv_zero : ¬const abv 1 ≈ const abv 0 := fun h =>
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, i ≤ k → abv (1 - 0) < ε := h
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt fun h2 : 0 < abv 1 =>
(Exists.elim (this _ h2)) fun i hi => lt_irrefl (abv 1) <| by simpa using hi _ le_rfl
have h2 : 0 ≤ abv 1 := abv_nonneg abv _
have : abv 1 = 0 := le_antisymm h1 h2
have : (1 : β) = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).mp this
absurd this one_ne_zero
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε
| _, ε0 =>
let ⟨_, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f` with nonzero limit, create a Cauchy sequence with values equal to
the inverses of the values of `f`. -/
def inv (f : CauSeq β abv) (hf : ¬LimZero f) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : ⇑(inv f hf) = (f : ℕ → β)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem inv_apply {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : f * inv f hf ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
const abv x⁻¹ = inv (const abv x) (by rwa [const_limZero]) :=
rfl
end DivisionRing
section Abs
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def Pos (f : CauSeq α abs) : Prop :=
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_limZero_of_pos {f : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → ¬LimZero f
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0)
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ le_rfl
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : Pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨fun ⟨_, K0, _, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ le_rfl), fun h => ⟨x, h, 0, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → LimZero g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0))
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h j ij
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this⟩
protected theorem mul_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f * g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, mul_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : CauSeq α abs) : Pos f ∨ LimZero f ∨ Pos (-f) := by
rcases Classical.em (LimZero f) with h | h <;> simp [*]
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp ?_ ?_ <;>
refine fun h => ⟨K, K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩ <;>
have := (hi _ ij).1 <;>
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl
· rwa [abs_of_nonneg] at this
rw [abs_of_nonneg h] at h₁
exact
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ <| neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).1)
· rwa [abs_of_nonpos] at this
rw [abs_of_nonpos h] at h₁
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub]
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).2) h₁
instance : LT (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => Pos (g - f)⟩
instance : LE (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert pos_add_limZero fg (neg_limZero gh) using 1
simp
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h := by
have := pos_add_limZero gh (neg_limZero fg)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert add_pos fg gh using 1
simp
theorem lt_irrefl {f : CauSeq α abs} : ¬f < f
| h => not_limZero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_limZero])
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (Or.inl ∘ CauSeq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg) (Or.inr ∘ Setoid.trans hfg)
theorem le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (fun h => Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh)) fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.trans h hgh)
instance : Preorder (CauSeq α abs) where
lt := (· < ·)
le f g := f < g ∨ f ≈ g
le_refl _ := Or.inr (Setoid.refl _)
le_trans _ _ _ fg gh :=
match fg, gh with
| Or.inl fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_trans fg gh
| Or.inl fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inr <| Setoid.trans fg gh
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Or.inl h, not_or_intro (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_limZero_of_pos h)⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₁.resolve_right (mt (fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩
theorem le_antisymm {f g : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right fun h =>
h.imp (fun h => Setoid.symm h) fun h => by rwa [neg_sub] at h
theorem le_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or_assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right Or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show Pos _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq]; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
theorem le_of_exists {f g : CauSeq α abs} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
(or_assoc.2 (CauSeq.lt_total f g)).elim id fun hgf =>
False.elim
(let ⟨_, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _)))))
theorem exists_gt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, fun i _ => by
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt
⟨-a, show Pos _ by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_sup_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊔ a₂ - b₁ ⊔ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_inf_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊓ a₂ - b₁ ⊓ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
instance : Max (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_sup_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
instance : Min (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊓ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_inf_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊔ g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊓ g :=
rfl
theorem sup_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊔ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_sup_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.1), sup_lt_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.2, H₂.2⟩⟩
theorem inf_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊓ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.1, H₂.1⟩, inf_lt_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.2)⟩
theorem sup_equiv_sup {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊔ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊔ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
theorem inf_equiv_inf {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊓ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊓ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
protected theorem sup_lt {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a < c) (hb : b < c) : a ⊔ b < c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εa, εa0, ia, ha⟩, ⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩⟩ := ha, hb
refine ⟨εa ⊓ εb, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εa0, εb0⟩, ia ⊔ ib, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (ha _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_left _ _ _)
protected theorem lt_inf {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (hb : a < b) (hc : a < c) : a < b ⊓ c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩, ⟨εc, εc0, ic, hc⟩⟩ := hb, hc
refine ⟨εb ⊓ εc, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εb0, εc0⟩, ib ⊔ ic, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hc _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_right _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_idem (a : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ a = a := Subtype.ext (sup_idem _)
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_idem (a : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ a = a := Subtype.ext (inf_idem _)
protected theorem sup_comm (a b : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a := Subtype.ext (sup_comm _ _)
protected theorem inf_comm (a b : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a := Subtype.ext (inf_comm _ _)
protected theorem sup_eq_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b ≈ b := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0 : _ < _, i, h⟩ | h := h
· intro _ _
refine ⟨i, fun j hj => ?_⟩
dsimp
rw [← max_sub_sub_right]
rwa [sub_self, max_eq_right, abs_zero]
rw [sub_nonpos, ← sub_nonneg]
exact ε0.le.trans (h _ hj)
· refine Setoid.trans (sup_equiv_sup h (Setoid.refl _)) ?_
rw [CauSeq.sup_idem]
protected theorem inf_eq_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⊓ b ≈ b := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0 : _ < _, i, h⟩ | h := h
· intro _ _
refine ⟨i, fun j hj => ?_⟩
dsimp
rw [← min_sub_sub_right]
rwa [sub_self, min_eq_right, abs_zero]
exact ε0.le.trans (h _ hj)
· refine Setoid.trans (inf_equiv_inf (Setoid.symm h) (Setoid.refl _)) ?_
rw [CauSeq.inf_idem]
protected theorem sup_eq_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⊔ b ≈ a := by
simpa only [CauSeq.sup_comm] using CauSeq.sup_eq_right h
protected theorem inf_eq_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊓ b ≈ a := by
simpa only [CauSeq.inf_comm] using CauSeq.inf_eq_right h
protected theorem le_sup_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => le_sup_left⟩
protected theorem inf_le_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ⊓ b ≤ a :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => inf_le_left⟩
protected theorem le_sup_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} : b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => le_sup_right⟩
protected theorem inf_le_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ⊓ b ≤ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => inf_le_right⟩
protected theorem sup_le {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a ≤ c) (hb : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c := by
obtain ha | ha := ha
· obtain hb | hb := hb
· exact Or.inl (CauSeq.sup_lt ha hb)
· replace ha := le_of_le_of_eq ha.le (Setoid.symm hb)
refine le_of_le_of_eq (Or.inr ?_) hb
exact CauSeq.sup_eq_right ha
· replace hb := le_of_le_of_eq hb (Setoid.symm ha)
refine le_of_le_of_eq (Or.inr ?_) ha
exact CauSeq.sup_eq_left hb
protected theorem le_inf {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (hb : a ≤ b) (hc : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ⊓ c := by
obtain hb | hb := hb
· obtain hc | hc := hc
· exact Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_inf hb hc)
· replace hb := le_of_eq_of_le (Setoid.symm hc) hb.le
refine le_of_eq_of_le hc (Or.inr ?_)
exact Setoid.symm (CauSeq.inf_eq_right hb)
· replace hc := le_of_eq_of_le (Setoid.symm hb) hc
refine le_of_eq_of_le hb (Or.inr ?_)
exact Setoid.symm (CauSeq.inf_eq_left hc)
/-! Note that `DistribLattice (CauSeq α abs)` is not true because there is no `PartialOrder`. -/
protected theorem sup_inf_distrib_left (a b c : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ b ⊓ c = (a ⊔ b) ⊓ (a ⊔ c) :=
ext fun _ ↦ max_min_distrib_left _ _ _
protected theorem sup_inf_distrib_right (a b c : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ b ⊔ c = (a ⊔ c) ⊓ (b ⊔ c) :=
ext fun _ ↦ max_min_distrib_right _ _ _
end Abs
end CauSeq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 945 | 946 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,033 | 2,034 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Cat.AsSmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.StructuredArrow.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.IsConnected
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Grothendieck
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Filtered.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.PUnit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Grothendieck
/-!
# Final and initial functors
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is final if for every `d : D`,
the comma category of morphisms `d ⟶ F.obj c` is connected.
Dually, a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial if for every `d : D`,
the comma category of morphisms `F.obj c ⟶ d` is connected.
We show that right adjoints are examples of final functors, while
left adjoints are examples of initial functors.
For final functors, we prove that the following three statements are equivalent:
1. `F : C ⥤ D` is final.
2. Every functor `G : D ⥤ E` has a colimit if and only if `F ⋙ G` does,
and these colimits are isomorphic via `colimit.pre G F`.
3. `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit`.
Starting at 1. we show (in `coconesEquiv`) that
the categories of cocones over `G : D ⥤ E` and over `F ⋙ G` are equivalent.
(In fact, via an equivalence which does not change the cocone point.)
This readily implies 2., as `comp_hasColimit`, `hasColimit_of_comp`, and `colimitIso`.
From 2. we can specialize to `G = coyoneda.obj (op d)` to obtain 3., as `colimitCompCoyonedaIso`.
From 3., we prove 1. directly in `final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit`.
Dually, we prove that if a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial, then any functor `G : D ⥤ E` has a
limit if and only if `F ⋙ G` does, and these limits are isomorphic via `limit.pre G F`.
In the end of the file, we characterize the finality of some important induced functors on the
(co)structured arrow category (`StructuredArrow.pre` and `CostructuredArrow.pre`) and on the
Grothendieck construction (`Grothendieck.pre` and `Grothendieck.map`).
## Naming
There is some discrepancy in the literature about naming; some say 'cofinal' instead of 'final'.
The explanation for this is that the 'co' prefix here is *not* the usual category-theoretic one
indicating duality, but rather indicating the sense of "along with".
## See also
In `CategoryTheory.Filtered.Final` we give additional equivalent conditions in the case that
`C` is filtered.
## Future work
Dualise condition 3 above and the implications 2 ⇒ 3 and 3 ⇒ 1 to initial functors.
## References
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/09WN
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/final+functor
* Borceux, Handbook of Categorical Algebra I, Section 2.11.
(Note he reverses the roles of definition and main result relative to here!)
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Functor
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
section ArbitraryUniverse
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is final if for every `d : D`, the comma category of morphisms `d ⟶ F.obj c`
is connected. -/
@[stacks 04E6]
class Final (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
out (d : D) : IsConnected (StructuredArrow d F)
attribute [instance] Final.out
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial if for every `d : D`, the comma category of morphisms
`F.obj c ⟶ d` is connected.
-/
class Initial (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
out (d : D) : IsConnected (CostructuredArrow F d)
attribute [instance] Initial.out
instance final_op_of_initial (F : C ⥤ D) [Initial F] : Final F.op where
out d := isConnected_of_equivalent (costructuredArrowOpEquivalence F (unop d))
instance initial_op_of_final (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F] : Initial F.op where
out d := isConnected_of_equivalent (structuredArrowOpEquivalence F (unop d))
theorem final_of_initial_op (F : C ⥤ D) [Initial F.op] : Final F :=
{
out := fun d =>
@isConnected_of_isConnected_op _ _
(isConnected_of_equivalent (structuredArrowOpEquivalence F d).symm) }
theorem initial_of_final_op (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F.op] : Initial F :=
{
out := fun d =>
@isConnected_of_isConnected_op _ _
(isConnected_of_equivalent (costructuredArrowOpEquivalence F d).symm) }
attribute [local simp] Adjunction.homEquiv_unit Adjunction.homEquiv_counit
/-- If a functor `R : D ⥤ C` is a right adjoint, it is final. -/
theorem final_of_adjunction {L : C ⥤ D} {R : D ⥤ C} (adj : L ⊣ R) : Final R :=
{ out := fun c =>
let u : StructuredArrow c R := StructuredArrow.mk (adj.unit.app c)
@zigzag_isConnected _ _ ⟨u⟩ fun f g =>
Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag f u from
Or.inr ⟨StructuredArrow.homMk ((adj.homEquiv c f.right).symm f.hom) (by simp [u])⟩))
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag u g from
Or.inl ⟨StructuredArrow.homMk ((adj.homEquiv c g.right).symm g.hom) (by simp [u])⟩)) }
/-- If a functor `L : C ⥤ D` is a left adjoint, it is initial. -/
theorem initial_of_adjunction {L : C ⥤ D} {R : D ⥤ C} (adj : L ⊣ R) : Initial L :=
{ out := fun d =>
let u : CostructuredArrow L d := CostructuredArrow.mk (adj.counit.app d)
@zigzag_isConnected _ _ ⟨u⟩ fun f g =>
Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag f u from
Or.inl ⟨CostructuredArrow.homMk (adj.homEquiv f.left d f.hom) (by simp [u])⟩))
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag u g from
Or.inr ⟨CostructuredArrow.homMk (adj.homEquiv g.left d g.hom) (by simp [u])⟩)) }
instance (priority := 100) final_of_isRightAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsRightAdjoint F] : Final F :=
final_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint F)
instance (priority := 100) initial_of_isLeftAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint F] : Initial F :=
initial_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint F)
theorem final_of_natIso {F F' : C ⥤ D} [Final F] (i : F ≅ F') : Final F' where
out _ := isConnected_of_equivalent (StructuredArrow.mapNatIso i)
theorem final_natIso_iff {F F' : C ⥤ D} (i : F ≅ F') : Final F ↔ Final F' :=
⟨fun _ => final_of_natIso i, fun _ => final_of_natIso i.symm⟩
theorem initial_of_natIso {F F' : C ⥤ D} [Initial F] (i : F ≅ F') : Initial F' where
out _ := isConnected_of_equivalent (CostructuredArrow.mapNatIso i)
theorem initial_natIso_iff {F F' : C ⥤ D} (i : F ≅ F') : Initial F ↔ Initial F' :=
⟨fun _ => initial_of_natIso i, fun _ => initial_of_natIso i.symm⟩
namespace Final
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F]
instance (d : D) : Nonempty (StructuredArrow d F) :=
IsConnected.is_nonempty
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/--
When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, we denote by `lift F d` an arbitrary choice of object in `C` such that
there exists a morphism `d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d)`.
-/
def lift (d : D) : C :=
(Classical.arbitrary (StructuredArrow d F)).right
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, we denote by `homToLift` an arbitrary choice of morphism
`d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d)`.
-/
def homToLift (d : D) : d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d) :=
(Classical.arbitrary (StructuredArrow d F)).hom
/-- We provide an induction principle for reasoning about `lift` and `homToLift`.
We want to perform some construction (usually just a proof) about
the particular choices `lift F d` and `homToLift F d`,
it suffices to perform that construction for some other pair of choices
(denoted `X₀ : C` and `k₀ : d ⟶ F.obj X₀` below),
and to show how to transport such a construction
*both* directions along a morphism between such choices.
-/
def induction {d : D} (Z : ∀ (X : C) (_ : d ⟶ F.obj X), Sort*)
(h₁ :
∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : d ⟶ F.obj X₁) (k₂ : d ⟶ F.obj X₂) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
k₁ ≫ F.map f = k₂ → Z X₁ k₁ → Z X₂ k₂)
(h₂ :
∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : d ⟶ F.obj X₁) (k₂ : d ⟶ F.obj X₂) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
k₁ ≫ F.map f = k₂ → Z X₂ k₂ → Z X₁ k₁)
{X₀ : C} {k₀ : d ⟶ F.obj X₀} (z : Z X₀ k₀) : Z (lift F d) (homToLift F d) := by
apply Nonempty.some
apply
@isPreconnected_induction _ _ _ (fun Y : StructuredArrow d F => Z Y.right Y.hom) _ _
(StructuredArrow.mk k₀) z
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₁ _ _ _ _ f.right _ a
convert f.w.symm
dsimp
simp
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₂ _ _ _ _ f.right _ a
convert f.w.symm
dsimp
simp
variable {F G}
/-- Given a cocone over `F ⋙ G`, we can construct a `Cocone G` with the same cocone point.
-/
@[simps]
def extendCocone : Cocone (F ⋙ G) ⥤ Cocone G where
obj c :=
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun X => G.map (homToLift F X) ≫ c.ι.app (lift F X)
naturality := fun X Y f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
-- This would be true if we'd chosen `lift F X` to be `lift F Y`
-- and `homToLift F X` to be `f ≫ homToLift F Y`.
apply
induction F fun Z k =>
G.map f ≫ G.map (homToLift F Y) ≫ c.ι.app (lift F Y) = G.map k ≫ c.ι.app Z
· intro Z₁ Z₂ k₁ k₂ g a z
rw [← a, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, c.w, z]
· intro Z₁ Z₂ k₁ k₂ g a z
rw [← a, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, c.w] at z
rw [z]
· rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc] } }
map f := { hom := f.hom }
/-- Alternative equational lemma for `(extendCocone c).ι.app` in case a lift of the object
is given explicitly. -/
lemma extendCocone_obj_ι_app' (c : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) {X : D} {Y : C} (f : X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
(extendCocone.obj c).ι.app X = G.map f ≫ c.ι.app Y := by
apply induction (k₀ := f) (z := rfl) F fun Z g =>
G.map g ≫ c.ι.app Z = G.map f ≫ c.ι.app Y
· intro _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
simp [← h₁, ← Functor.comp_map, c.ι.naturality, h₂]
· intro _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
simp [← h₂, ← h₁, ← Functor.comp_map, c.ι.naturality]
@[simp]
theorem colimit_cocone_comp_aux (s : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) (j : C) :
G.map (homToLift F (F.obj j)) ≫ s.ι.app (lift F (F.obj j)) = s.ι.app j := by
-- This point is that this would be true if we took `lift (F.obj j)` to just be `j`
-- and `homToLift (F.obj j)` to be `𝟙 (F.obj j)`.
apply induction F fun X k => G.map k ≫ s.ι.app X = (s.ι.app j :)
· intro j₁ j₂ k₁ k₂ f w h
rw [← w]
rw [← s.w f] at h
simpa using h
· intro j₁ j₂ k₁ k₂ f w h
rw [← w] at h
rw [← s.w f]
simpa using h
· exact s.w (𝟙 _)
variable (F G)
/-- If `F` is final,
the category of cocones on `F ⋙ G` is equivalent to the category of cocones on `G`,
for any `G : D ⥤ E`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconesEquiv : Cocone (F ⋙ G) ≌ Cocone G where
functor := extendCocone
inverse := Cocones.whiskering F
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun c => Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun c => Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
variable {G}
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, and `t : Cocone G` for some `G : D ⥤ E`,
`t.whisker F` is a colimit cocone exactly when `t` is.
-/
def isColimitWhiskerEquiv (t : Cocone G) : IsColimit (t.whisker F) ≃ IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (coconesEquiv F G).symm
/-- When `F` is final, and `t : Cocone (F ⋙ G)`,
`extendCocone.obj t` is a colimit cocone exactly when `t` is.
-/
def isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (t : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) :
IsColimit (extendCocone.obj t) ≃ IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (coconesEquiv F G)
/-- Given a colimit cocone over `G : D ⥤ E` we can construct a colimit cocone over `F ⋙ G`. -/
@[simps]
def colimitCoconeComp (t : ColimitCocone G) : ColimitCocone (F ⋙ G) where
cocone := _
isColimit := (isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm t.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) comp_hasColimit [HasColimit G] : HasColimit (F ⋙ G) :=
HasColimit.mk (colimitCoconeComp F (getColimitCocone G))
instance (priority := 100) comp_preservesColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[PreservesColimit G H] : PreservesColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
preserves {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (G := G ⋙ H) F (H.mapCocone c) ?_⟩
let hc' := isColimitOfPreserves H ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F c).symm hc)
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
instance (priority := 100) comp_reflectsColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[ReflectsColimit G H] : ReflectsColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
reflects {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F _ (isColimitOfReflects H ?_)⟩
let hc' := (isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (G := G ⋙ H) F _).symm hc
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
instance (priority := 100) compCreatesColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[CreatesColimit G H] : CreatesColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
lifts {c} hc := by
refine ⟨(liftColimit ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F (G := G ⋙ H) _).symm hc)).whisker F, ?_⟩
let i := liftedColimitMapsToOriginal ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F (G := G ⋙ H) _).symm hc)
exact (Cocones.whiskering F).mapIso i ≪≫ ((coconesEquiv F (G ⋙ H)).unitIso.app _).symm
instance colimit_pre_isIso [HasColimit G] : IsIso (colimit.pre G F) := by
rw [colimit.pre_eq (colimitCoconeComp F (getColimitCocone G)) (getColimitCocone G)]
erw [IsColimit.desc_self]
dsimp
infer_instance
section
variable (G)
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, and `G : D ⥤ E` has a colimit, then `F ⋙ G` has a colimit also and
`colimit (F ⋙ G) ≅ colimit G`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp, stacks 04E7]
def colimitIso [HasColimit G] : colimit (F ⋙ G) ≅ colimit G :=
asIso (colimit.pre G F)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimitIso_hom [HasColimit G] (X : C) :
colimit.ι (F ⋙ G) X ≫ (colimitIso F G).hom = colimit.ι G (F.obj X) := by
simp [colimitIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimitIso_inv [HasColimit G] (X : C) :
colimit.ι G (F.obj X) ≫ (colimitIso F G).inv = colimit.ι (F ⋙ G) X := by
simp [colimitIso]
/-- A pointfree version of `colimitIso`, stating that whiskering by `F` followed by taking the
colimit is isomorpic to taking the colimit on the codomain of `F`. -/
def colimIso [HasColimitsOfShape D E] [HasColimitsOfShape C E] :
(whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj F ⋙ colim ≅ colim (J := D) (C := E) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun G => colimitIso F G) fun f => by
simp only [comp_obj, whiskeringLeft_obj_obj, colim_obj, comp_map, whiskeringLeft_obj_map,
colim_map, colimitIso_hom]
ext
simp only [comp_obj, ι_colimMap_assoc, whiskerLeft_app, colimit.ι_pre, colimit.ι_pre_assoc,
ι_colimMap]
end
/-- Given a colimit cocone over `F ⋙ G` we can construct a colimit cocone over `G`. -/
@[simps]
def colimitCoconeOfComp (t : ColimitCocone (F ⋙ G)) : ColimitCocone G where
cocone := extendCocone.obj t.cocone
isColimit := (isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F _).symm t.isColimit
/-- When `F` is final, and `F ⋙ G` has a colimit, then `G` has a colimit also.
We can't make this an instance, because `F` is not determined by the goal.
(Even if this weren't a problem, it would cause a loop with `comp_hasColimit`.)
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_comp [HasColimit (F ⋙ G)] : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk (colimitCoconeOfComp F (getColimitCocone (F ⋙ G)))
theorem preservesColimit_of_comp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[PreservesColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : PreservesColimit G H where
preserves {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _ ?_⟩
let hc' := isColimitOfPreserves H ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
theorem reflectsColimit_of_comp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[ReflectsColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : ReflectsColimit G H where
reflects {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _ (isColimitOfReflects H ?_)⟩
let hc' := (isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- If `F` is final and `F ⋙ G` creates colimits of `H`, then so does `G`. -/
def createsColimitOfComp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[CreatesColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : CreatesColimit G H where
reflects := (reflectsColimit_of_comp F).reflects
lifts {c} hc := by
refine ⟨(extendCocone (F := F)).obj (liftColimit ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)), ?_⟩
let i := liftedColimitMapsToOriginal (K := (F ⋙ G)) ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)
refine ?_ ≪≫ ((extendCocone (F := F)).mapIso i) ≪≫ ((coconesEquiv F (G ⋙ H)).counitIso.app _)
exact Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
include F in
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_final [HasColimitsOfShape C E] : HasColimitsOfShape D E where
has_colimit := fun _ => hasColimit_of_comp F
include F in
theorem preservesColimitsOfShape_of_final {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[PreservesColimitsOfShape C H] : PreservesColimitsOfShape D H where
preservesColimit := preservesColimit_of_comp F
include F in
theorem reflectsColimitsOfShape_of_final {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape C H] : ReflectsColimitsOfShape D H where
reflectsColimit := reflectsColimit_of_comp F
include F in
/-- If `H` creates colimits of shape `C` and `F : C ⥤ D` is final, then `H` creates colimits of
shape `D`. -/
def createsColimitsOfShapeOfFinal {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[CreatesColimitsOfShape C H] : CreatesColimitsOfShape D H where
CreatesColimit := createsColimitOfComp F
end Final
end ArbitraryUniverse
|
section LocallySmall
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
namespace Final
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Final.lean | 433 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Discrete.Basic
/-!
# Categorical (co)products
This file defines (co)products as special cases of (co)limits.
A product is the categorical generalization of the object `Π i, f i` where `f : ι → C`. It is a
limit cone over the diagram formed by `f`, implemented by converting `f` into a functor
`Discrete ι ⥤ C`.
A coproduct is the dual concept.
## Main definitions
* a `Fan` is a cone over a discrete category
* `Fan.mk` constructs a fan from an indexed collection of maps
* a `Pi` is a `limit (Discrete.functor f)`
Each of these has a dual.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' w₂ w₃ v v₂ u u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {β : Type w} {α : Type w₂} {γ : Type w₃}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
-- We don't need an analogue of `Pair` (for binary products), `ParallelPair` (for equalizers),
-- or `(Co)span`, since we already have `Discrete.functor`.
/-- A fan over `f : β → C` consists of a collection of maps from an object `P` to every `f b`. -/
abbrev Fan (f : β → C) :=
Cone (Discrete.functor f)
/-- A cofan over `f : β → C` consists of a collection of maps from every `f b` to an object `P`. -/
abbrev Cofan (f : β → C) :=
Cocone (Discrete.functor f)
/-- A fan over `f : β → C` consists of a collection of maps from an object `P` to every `f b`. -/
@[simps! pt π_app]
def Fan.mk {f : β → C} (P : C) (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : Fan f where
pt := P
π := Discrete.natTrans (fun X => p X.as)
/-- A cofan over `f : β → C` consists of a collection of maps from every `f b` to an object `P`. -/
@[simps! pt ι_app]
def Cofan.mk {f : β → C} (P : C) (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : Cofan f where
pt := P
ι := Discrete.natTrans (fun X => p X.as)
/-- Get the `j`th "projection" in the fan.
(Note that the initial letter of `proj` matches the greek letter in `Cone.π`.) -/
def Fan.proj {f : β → C} (p : Fan f) (j : β) : p.pt ⟶ f j :=
p.π.app (Discrete.mk j)
/-- Get the `j`th "injection" in the cofan.
(Note that the initial letter of `inj` matches the greek letter in `Cocone.ι`.) -/
def Cofan.inj {f : β → C} (p : Cofan f) (j : β) : f j ⟶ p.pt :=
p.ι.app (Discrete.mk j)
@[simp]
theorem fan_mk_proj {f : β → C} (P : C) (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : (Fan.mk P p).proj = p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cofan_mk_inj {f : β → C} (P : C) (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : (Cofan.mk P p).inj = p :=
rfl
/-- An abbreviation for `HasLimit (Discrete.functor f)`. -/
abbrev HasProduct (f : β → C) :=
HasLimit (Discrete.functor f)
/-- An abbreviation for `HasColimit (Discrete.functor f)`. -/
abbrev HasCoproduct (f : β → C) :=
HasColimit (Discrete.functor f)
lemma hasCoproduct_of_equiv_of_iso (f : α → C) (g : β → C)
[HasCoproduct f] (e : β ≃ α) (iso : ∀ j, g j ≅ f (e j)) : HasCoproduct g := by
have : HasColimit ((Discrete.equivalence e).functor ⋙ Discrete.functor f) :=
hasColimit_equivalence_comp _
have α : Discrete.functor g ≅ (Discrete.equivalence e).functor ⋙ Discrete.functor f :=
Discrete.natIso (fun ⟨j⟩ => iso j)
exact hasColimit_of_iso α
lemma hasProduct_of_equiv_of_iso (f : α → C) (g : β → C)
[HasProduct f] (e : β ≃ α) (iso : ∀ j, g j ≅ f (e j)) : HasProduct g := by
have : HasLimit ((Discrete.equivalence e).functor ⋙ Discrete.functor f) :=
hasLimitEquivalenceComp _
have α : Discrete.functor g ≅ (Discrete.equivalence e).functor ⋙ Discrete.functor f :=
Discrete.natIso (fun ⟨j⟩ => iso j)
exact hasLimit_of_iso α.symm
/-- Make a fan `f` into a limit fan by providing `lift`, `fac`, and `uniq` --
just a convenience lemma to avoid having to go through `Discrete` -/
@[simps]
def mkFanLimit {f : β → C} (t : Fan f) (lift : ∀ s : Fan f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ (s : Fan f) (j : β), lift s ≫ t.proj j = s.proj j := by aesop_cat)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Fan f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : ∀ j : β, m ≫ t.proj j = s.proj j),
m = lift s := by aesop_cat) :
IsLimit t :=
{ lift }
/-- Constructor for morphisms to the point of a limit fan. -/
def Fan.IsLimit.desc {F : β → C} {c : Fan F} (hc : IsLimit c) {A : C}
(f : ∀ i, A ⟶ F i) : A ⟶ c.pt :=
hc.lift (Fan.mk A f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Fan.IsLimit.fac {F : β → C} {c : Fan F} (hc : IsLimit c) {A : C}
(f : ∀ i, A ⟶ F i) (i : β) :
Fan.IsLimit.desc hc f ≫ c.proj i = f i :=
hc.fac (Fan.mk A f) ⟨i⟩
lemma Fan.IsLimit.hom_ext {I : Type*} {F : I → C} {c : Fan F} (hc : IsLimit c) {A : C}
(f g : A ⟶ c.pt) (h : ∀ i, f ≫ c.proj i = g ≫ c.proj i) : f = g :=
hc.hom_ext (fun ⟨i⟩ => h i)
/-- Make a cofan `f` into a colimit cofan by providing `desc`, `fac`, and `uniq` --
just a convenience lemma to avoid having to go through `Discrete` -/
@[simps]
def mkCofanColimit {f : β → C} (s : Cofan f) (desc : ∀ t : Cofan f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ (t : Cofan f) (j : β), s.inj j ≫ desc t = t.inj j := by aesop_cat)
(uniq : ∀ (t : Cofan f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : ∀ j : β, s.inj j ≫ m = t.inj j),
m = desc t := by aesop_cat) :
IsColimit s :=
{ desc }
/-- Constructor for morphisms from the point of a colimit cofan. -/
def Cofan.IsColimit.desc {F : β → C} {c : Cofan F} (hc : IsColimit c) {A : C}
(f : ∀ i, F i ⟶ A) : c.pt ⟶ A :=
hc.desc (Cofan.mk A f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Cofan.IsColimit.fac {F : β → C} {c : Cofan F} (hc : IsColimit c) {A : C}
(f : ∀ i, F i ⟶ A) (i : β) :
c.inj i ≫ Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc f = f i :=
hc.fac (Cofan.mk A f) ⟨i⟩
lemma Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {I : Type*} {F : I → C} {c : Cofan F} (hc : IsColimit c) {A : C}
(f g : c.pt ⟶ A) (h : ∀ i, c.inj i ≫ f = c.inj i ≫ g) : f = g :=
hc.hom_ext (fun ⟨i⟩ => h i)
section
variable (C)
/-- An abbreviation for `HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete f)`. -/
abbrev HasProductsOfShape (β : Type v) :=
HasLimitsOfShape.{v} (Discrete β)
/-- An abbreviation for `HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete f)`. -/
abbrev HasCoproductsOfShape (β : Type v) :=
HasColimitsOfShape.{v} (Discrete β)
end
/-- `piObj f` computes the product of a family of elements `f`.
(It is defined as an abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`,
so for most facts about `piObj f`, you will just use general facts about limits.) -/
abbrev piObj (f : β → C) [HasProduct f] :=
limit (Discrete.functor f)
/-- `sigmaObj f` computes the coproduct of a family of elements `f`.
(It is defined as an abbreviation for `colimit (Discrete.functor f)`,
so for most facts about `sigmaObj f`, you will just use general facts about colimits.) -/
abbrev sigmaObj (f : β → C) [HasCoproduct f] :=
colimit (Discrete.functor f)
/-- notation for categorical products. We need `ᶜ` to avoid conflict with `Finset.prod`. -/
notation "∏ᶜ " f:60 => piObj f
/-- notation for categorical coproducts -/
notation "∐ " f:60 => sigmaObj f
/-- The `b`-th projection from the pi object over `f` has the form `∏ᶜ f ⟶ f b`. -/
abbrev Pi.π (f : β → C) [HasProduct f] (b : β) : ∏ᶜ f ⟶ f b :=
limit.π (Discrete.functor f) (Discrete.mk b)
/-- The `b`-th inclusion into the sigma object over `f` has the form `f b ⟶ ∐ f`. -/
abbrev Sigma.ι (f : β → C) [HasCoproduct f] (b : β) : f b ⟶ ∐ f :=
colimit.ι (Discrete.functor f) (Discrete.mk b)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added the next two lemmas to ease automation; without these lemmas,
-- `limit.hom_ext` would be applied, but the goal would involve terms
-- in `Discrete β` rather than `β` itself
@[ext 1050]
lemma Pi.hom_ext {f : β → C} [HasProduct f] {X : C} (g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ ∏ᶜ f)
(h : ∀ (b : β), g₁ ≫ Pi.π f b = g₂ ≫ Pi.π f b) : g₁ = g₂ :=
limit.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ => h j)
@[ext 1050]
lemma Sigma.hom_ext {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] {X : C} (g₁ g₂ : ∐ f ⟶ X)
(h : ∀ (b : β), Sigma.ι f b ≫ g₁ = Sigma.ι f b ≫ g₂) : g₁ = g₂ :=
colimit.hom_ext (fun ⟨j⟩ => h j)
/-- The fan constructed of the projections from the product is limiting. -/
def productIsProduct (f : β → C) [HasProduct f] : IsLimit (Fan.mk _ (Pi.π f)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit (Discrete.functor f)) (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _))
/-- The cofan constructed of the inclusions from the coproduct is colimiting. -/
def coproductIsCoproduct (f : β → C) [HasCoproduct f] : IsColimit (Cofan.mk _ (Sigma.ι f)) :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor f)) (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _))
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `Pi.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem Pi.π_comp_eqToHom {J : Type*} (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
Pi.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = Pi.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `Sigma.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem Sigma.eqToHom_comp_ι {J : Type*} (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ Sigma.ι f j' = Sigma.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
/-- A collection of morphisms `P ⟶ f b` induces a morphism `P ⟶ ∏ᶜ f`. -/
abbrev Pi.lift {f : β → C} [HasProduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ∏ᶜ f :=
limit.lift _ (Fan.mk P p)
theorem Pi.lift_π {β : Type w} {f : β → C} [HasProduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (b : β) :
Pi.lift p ≫ Pi.π f b = p b := by
simp only [limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_pt, Fan.mk_π_app]
/-- A version of `Cones.ext` for `Fan`s. -/
@[simps!]
def Fan.ext {f : β → C} {c₁ c₂ : Fan f} (e : c₁.pt ≅ c₂.pt)
(w : ∀ (b : β), c₁.proj b = e.hom ≫ c₂.proj b := by aesop_cat) : c₁ ≅ c₂ :=
Cones.ext e (fun ⟨j⟩ => w j)
/-- A collection of morphisms `f b ⟶ P` induces a morphism `∐ f ⟶ P`. -/
abbrev Sigma.desc {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ∐ f ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc _ (Cofan.mk P p)
theorem Sigma.ι_desc {β : Type w} {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (b : β) :
Sigma.ι f b ≫ Sigma.desc p = p b := by
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app]
instance {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] : IsIso (Sigma.desc (fun a ↦ Sigma.ι f a)) := by
convert IsIso.id _
ext
simp
/-- A version of `Cocones.ext` for `Cofan`s. -/
@[simps!]
def Cofan.ext {f : β → C} {c₁ c₂ : Cofan f} (e : c₁.pt ≅ c₂.pt)
(w : ∀ (b : β), c₁.inj b ≫ e.hom = c₂.inj b := by aesop_cat) : c₁ ≅ c₂ :=
Cocones.ext e (fun ⟨j⟩ => w j)
/-- A cofan `c` on `f` such that the induced map `∐ f ⟶ c.pt` is an iso, is a coproduct. -/
def Cofan.isColimitOfIsIsoSigmaDesc {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] (c : Cofan f)
[hc : IsIso (Sigma.desc c.inj)] : IsColimit c :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor f))
(Cofan.ext (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ hc) (fun _ => colimit.ι_desc _ _))
lemma Cofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_sigmaDesc {f : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] (c : Cofan f) :
IsIso (Sigma.desc c.inj) ↔ Nonempty (IsColimit c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨isColimitOfIsIsoSigmaDesc c⟩, fun ⟨hc⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have : IsIso (((coproductIsCoproduct f).coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc).hom ≫ hc.desc c) := by
simp; infer_instance
convert this
ext
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, mk_pt, mk_ι_app, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso,
coproductIsCoproduct, colimit.cocone_x, Functor.mapIso_hom, IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso_hom,
Cocones.forget_map, IsColimit.descCoconeMorphism_hom, IsColimit.ofIsoColimit_desc,
Cocones.ext_inv_hom, Iso.refl_inv, colimit.isColimit_desc, Category.id_comp,
IsColimit.desc_self, Category.comp_id]
rfl
/-- A coproduct of coproducts is a coproduct -/
def Cofan.isColimitTrans {X : α → C} (c : Cofan X) (hc : IsColimit c)
{β : α → Type*} {Y : (a : α) → β a → C} (π : (a : α) → (b : β a) → Y a b ⟶ X a)
(hs : ∀ a, IsColimit (Cofan.mk (X a) (π a))) :
IsColimit (Cofan.mk (f := fun ⟨a,b⟩ => Y a b) c.pt
(fun (⟨a, b⟩ : Σ a, _) ↦ π a b ≫ c.inj a)) := by
refine mkCofanColimit _ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun t ↦ hc.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun a ↦ (hs a).desc (Cofan.mk t.pt (fun b ↦ t.inj ⟨a, b⟩)))
· intro t ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [mk_pt, cofan_mk_inj, Category.assoc]
erw [hc.fac, (hs a).fac]
rfl
· intro t m h
refine hc.hom_ext fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ (hs a).hom_ext fun ⟨b⟩ ↦ ?_
erw [hc.fac, (hs a).fac]
simpa using h ⟨a, b⟩
/-- Construct a morphism between categorical products (indexed by the same type)
from a family of morphisms between the factors.
-/
abbrev Pi.map {f g : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) : ∏ᶜ f ⟶ ∏ᶜ g :=
limMap (Discrete.natTrans fun X => p X.as)
@[simp]
lemma Pi.map_id {f : α → C} [HasProduct f] : Pi.map (fun a => 𝟙 (f a)) = 𝟙 (∏ᶜ f) := by
ext; simp
lemma Pi.map_comp_map {f g h : α → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] [HasProduct h]
(q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g a) (q' : ∀ (a : α), g a ⟶ h a) :
Pi.map q ≫ Pi.map q' = Pi.map (fun a => q a ≫ q' a) := by
ext; simp
instance Pi.map_mono {f g : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b)
[∀ i, Mono (p i)] : Mono <| Pi.map p :=
@Limits.limMap_mono _ _ _ _ (Discrete.functor f) (Discrete.functor g) _ _
(Discrete.natTrans fun X => p X.as) (by dsimp; infer_instance)
/-- Construct a morphism between categorical products from a family of morphisms between the
factors. -/
def Pi.map' {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] (p : β → α)
(q : ∀ (b : β), f (p b) ⟶ g b) : ∏ᶜ f ⟶ ∏ᶜ g :=
Pi.lift (fun a => Pi.π _ _ ≫ q a)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Pi.map'_comp_π {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] (p : β → α)
(q : ∀ (b : β), f (p b) ⟶ g b) (b : β) : Pi.map' p q ≫ Pi.π g b = Pi.π f (p b) ≫ q b :=
limit.lift_π _ _
lemma Pi.map'_id_id {f : α → C} [HasProduct f] : Pi.map' id (fun a => 𝟙 (f a)) = 𝟙 (∏ᶜ f) := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma Pi.map'_id {f g : α → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
Pi.map' id p = Pi.map p :=
rfl
lemma Pi.map'_comp_map' {f : α → C} {g : β → C} {h : γ → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g]
[HasProduct h] (p : β → α) (p' : γ → β) (q : ∀ (b : β), f (p b) ⟶ g b)
(q' : ∀ (c : γ), g (p' c) ⟶ h c) :
Pi.map' p q ≫ Pi.map' p' q' = Pi.map' (p ∘ p') (fun c => q (p' c) ≫ q' c) := by
ext; simp
lemma Pi.map'_comp_map {f : α → C} {g h : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] [HasProduct h]
(p : β → α) (q : ∀ (b : β), f (p b) ⟶ g b) (q' : ∀ (b : β), g b ⟶ h b) :
Pi.map' p q ≫ Pi.map q' = Pi.map' p (fun b => q b ≫ q' b) := by
ext; simp
lemma Pi.map_comp_map' {f g : α → C} {h : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] [HasProduct h]
(p : β → α) (q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g a) (q' : ∀ (b : β), g (p b) ⟶ h b) :
Pi.map q ≫ Pi.map' p q' = Pi.map' p (fun b => q (p b) ≫ q' b) := by
ext; simp
lemma Pi.map'_eq {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] {p p' : β → α}
{q : ∀ (b : β), f (p b) ⟶ g b} {q' : ∀ (b : β), f (p' b) ⟶ g b} (hp : p = p')
(hq : ∀ (b : β), eqToHom (hp ▸ rfl) ≫ q b = q' b) : Pi.map' p q = Pi.map' p' q' := by
aesop_cat
/-- Construct an isomorphism between categorical products (indexed by the same type)
from a family of isomorphisms between the factors.
-/
abbrev Pi.mapIso {f g : β → C} [HasProductsOfShape β C] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) : ∏ᶜ f ≅ ∏ᶜ g :=
lim.mapIso (Discrete.natIso fun X => p X.as)
instance Pi.map_isIso {f g : β → C} [HasProductsOfShape β C] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b)
[∀ b, IsIso <| p b] : IsIso <| Pi.map p :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (Pi.mapIso (fun b ↦ asIso (p b))).hom)
section
/- In this section, we provide some API for products when we are given a functor
`Discrete α ⥤ C` instead of a map `α → C`. -/
variable (X : Discrete α ⥤ C) [HasProduct (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))]
/-- A limit cone for `X : Discrete α ⥤ C` that is given
by `∏ᶜ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))`. -/
@[simps]
def Pi.cone : Cone X where
pt := ∏ᶜ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))
π := Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => Pi.π _ _)
/-- The cone `Pi.cone X` is a limit cone. -/
def productIsProduct' :
IsLimit (Pi.cone X) where
lift s := Pi.lift (fun j => s.π.app ⟨j⟩)
fac s := by simp
uniq s m hm := by
dsimp
ext
simp only [limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_pt, Fan.mk_π_app]
apply hm
variable [HasLimit X]
/-- The isomorphism `∏ᶜ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j)) ≅ limit X`. -/
def Pi.isoLimit :
∏ᶜ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j)) ≅ limit X :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (productIsProduct' X) (limit.isLimit X)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Pi.isoLimit_inv_π (j : α) :
(Pi.isoLimit X).inv ≫ Pi.π _ j = limit.π _ (Discrete.mk j) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Pi.isoLimit_hom_π (j : α) :
(Pi.isoLimit X).hom ≫ limit.π _ (Discrete.mk j) = Pi.π _ j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
end
/-- Construct a morphism between categorical coproducts (indexed by the same type)
from a family of morphisms between the factors.
-/
abbrev Sigma.map {f g : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
∐ f ⟶ ∐ g :=
colimMap (Discrete.natTrans fun X => p X.as)
@[simp]
lemma Sigma.map_id {f : α → C} [HasCoproduct f] : Sigma.map (fun a => 𝟙 (f a)) = 𝟙 (∐ f) := by
ext; simp
lemma Sigma.map_comp_map {f g h : α → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] [HasCoproduct h]
(q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g a) (q' : ∀ (a : α), g a ⟶ h a) :
Sigma.map q ≫ Sigma.map q' = Sigma.map (fun a => q a ≫ q' a) := by
ext; simp
instance Sigma.map_epi {f g : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b)
[∀ i, Epi (p i)] : Epi <| Sigma.map p :=
@Limits.colimMap_epi _ _ _ _ (Discrete.functor f) (Discrete.functor g) _ _
(Discrete.natTrans fun X => p X.as) (by dsimp; infer_instance)
/-- Construct a morphism between categorical coproducts from a family of morphisms between the
factors. -/
def Sigma.map' {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] (p : α → β)
(q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p a)) : ∐ f ⟶ ∐ g :=
Sigma.desc (fun a => q a ≫ Sigma.ι _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Sigma.ι_comp_map' {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g]
(p : α → β) (q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p a)) (a : α) :
Sigma.ι f a ≫ Sigma.map' p q = q a ≫ Sigma.ι g (p a) :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
lemma Sigma.map'_id_id {f : α → C} [HasCoproduct f] :
Sigma.map' id (fun a => 𝟙 (f a)) = 𝟙 (∐ f) := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma Sigma.map'_id {f g : α → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
Sigma.map' id p = Sigma.map p :=
rfl
lemma Sigma.map'_comp_map' {f : α → C} {g : β → C} {h : γ → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g]
[HasCoproduct h] (p : α → β) (p' : β → γ) (q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p a))
(q' : ∀ (b : β), g b ⟶ h (p' b)) :
Sigma.map' p q ≫ Sigma.map' p' q' = Sigma.map' (p' ∘ p) (fun a => q a ≫ q' (p a)) := by
ext; simp
lemma Sigma.map'_comp_map {f : α → C} {g h : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g]
[HasCoproduct h] (p : α → β) (q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p a)) (q' : ∀ (b : β), g b ⟶ h b) :
Sigma.map' p q ≫ Sigma.map q' = Sigma.map' p (fun a => q a ≫ q' (p a)) := by
ext; simp
lemma Sigma.map_comp_map' {f g : α → C} {h : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g]
[HasCoproduct h] (p : α → β) (q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g a) (q' : ∀ (a : α), g a ⟶ h (p a)) :
Sigma.map q ≫ Sigma.map' p q' = Sigma.map' p (fun a => q a ≫ q' a) := by
ext; simp
lemma Sigma.map'_eq {f : α → C} {g : β → C} [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g]
{p p' : α → β} {q : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p a)} {q' : ∀ (a : α), f a ⟶ g (p' a)}
(hp : p = p') (hq : ∀ (a : α), q a ≫ eqToHom (hp ▸ rfl) = q' a) :
Sigma.map' p q = Sigma.map' p' q' := by
aesop_cat
/-- Construct an isomorphism between categorical coproducts (indexed by the same type)
from a family of isomorphisms between the factors.
-/
abbrev Sigma.mapIso {f g : β → C} [HasCoproductsOfShape β C] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) : ∐ f ≅ ∐ g :=
colim.mapIso (Discrete.natIso fun X => p X.as)
instance Sigma.map_isIso {f g : β → C} [HasCoproductsOfShape β C] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b)
[∀ b, IsIso <| p b] : IsIso (Sigma.map p) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (Sigma.mapIso (fun b ↦ asIso (p b))).hom)
section
/- In this section, we provide some API for coproducts when we are given a functor
`Discrete α ⥤ C` instead of a map `α → C`. -/
variable (X : Discrete α ⥤ C) [HasCoproduct (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))]
/-- A colimit cocone for `X : Discrete α ⥤ C` that is given
by `∐ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))`. -/
@[simps]
def Sigma.cocone : Cocone X where
pt := ∐ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j))
ι := Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => Sigma.ι (fun j ↦ X.obj ⟨j⟩) _)
/-- The cocone `Sigma.cocone X` is a colimit cocone. -/
def coproductIsCoproduct' :
IsColimit (Sigma.cocone X) where
desc s := Sigma.desc (fun j => s.ι.app ⟨j⟩)
fac s := by simp
uniq s m hm := by
dsimp
ext
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app]
apply hm
variable [HasColimit X]
/-- The isomorphism `∐ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j)) ≅ colimit X`. -/
def Sigma.isoColimit :
∐ (fun j => X.obj (Discrete.mk j)) ≅ colimit X :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (coproductIsCoproduct' X) (colimit.isColimit X)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Sigma.ι_isoColimit_hom (j : α) :
Sigma.ι _ j ≫ (Sigma.isoColimit X).hom = colimit.ι _ (Discrete.mk j) :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (coproductIsCoproduct' X) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Sigma.ι_isoColimit_inv (j : α) :
colimit.ι _ ⟨j⟩ ≫ (Sigma.isoColimit X).inv = Sigma.ι (fun j ↦ X.obj ⟨j⟩) _ :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv _ _ _
end
/-- Two products which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
-/
@[simps]
def Pi.whiskerEquiv {J K : Type*} {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasProduct f] [HasProduct g] : ∏ᶜ f ≅ ∏ᶜ g where
hom := Pi.map' e.symm fun k => (w (e.symm k)).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp)
inv := Pi.map' e fun j => (w j).hom
/-- Two coproducts which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
-/
@[simps]
def Sigma.whiskerEquiv {J K : Type*} {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct g] : ∐ f ≅ ∐ g where
hom := Sigma.map' e fun j => (w j).inv
inv := Sigma.map' e.symm fun k => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (w (e.symm k)).hom
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The last proof was previously by `aesop_cat`. -/
instance {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasProduct (g i)] [HasProduct fun i => ∏ᶜ g i] :
HasProduct fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2 where
exists_limit := Nonempty.intro
{ cone := Fan.mk (∏ᶜ fun i => ∏ᶜ g i) (fun X => Pi.π (fun i => ∏ᶜ g i) X.1 ≫ Pi.π (g X.1) X.2)
isLimit := mkFanLimit _ (fun s => Pi.lift fun b => Pi.lift fun c => s.proj ⟨b, c⟩)
(by simp)
(by intro s m w; simp only [Fan.mk_pt]; symm; ext i x; simp_all [Sigma.forall]) }
/-- An iterated product is a product over a sigma type. -/
@[simps]
def piPiIso {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasProduct (g i)] [HasProduct fun i => ∏ᶜ g i] :
(∏ᶜ fun i => ∏ᶜ g i) ≅ (∏ᶜ fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) where
hom := Pi.lift fun ⟨i, x⟩ => Pi.π _ i ≫ Pi.π _ x
inv := Pi.lift fun i => Pi.lift fun x => Pi.π _ (⟨i, x⟩ : Σ i, f i)
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The last proof was previously by `aesop_cat`. -/
instance {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasCoproduct (g i)] [HasCoproduct fun i => ∐ g i] :
HasCoproduct fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2 where
exists_colimit := Nonempty.intro
{ cocone := Cofan.mk (∐ fun i => ∐ g i)
(fun X => Sigma.ι (g X.1) X.2 ≫ Sigma.ι (fun i => ∐ g i) X.1)
isColimit := mkCofanColimit _
(fun s => Sigma.desc fun b => Sigma.desc fun c => s.inj ⟨b, c⟩)
(by simp)
(by intro s m w; simp only [Cofan.mk_pt]; symm; ext i x; simp_all [Sigma.forall]) }
/-- An iterated coproduct is a coproduct over a sigma type. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaSigmaIso {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasCoproduct (g i)] [HasCoproduct fun i => ∐ g i] :
(∐ fun i => ∐ g i) ≅ (∐ fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) where
hom := Sigma.desc fun i => Sigma.desc fun x => Sigma.ι (fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) ⟨i, x⟩
inv := Sigma.desc fun ⟨i, x⟩ => Sigma.ι (g i) x ≫ Sigma.ι (fun i => ∐ g i) i
section Comparison
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (G : C ⥤ D)
variable (f : β → C)
/-- The comparison morphism for the product of `f`. This is an iso iff `G` preserves the product
of `f`, see `PreservesProduct.ofIsoComparison`. -/
def piComparison [HasProduct f] [HasProduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] :
G.obj (∏ᶜ f) ⟶ ∏ᶜ fun b => G.obj (f b) :=
Pi.lift fun b => G.map (Pi.π f b)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem piComparison_comp_π [HasProduct f] [HasProduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] (b : β) :
piComparison G f ≫ Pi.π _ b = G.map (Pi.π f b) :=
limit.lift_π _ (Discrete.mk b)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_lift_piComparison [HasProduct f] [HasProduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] (P : C)
(g : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) : G.map (Pi.lift g) ≫ piComparison G f = Pi.lift fun j => G.map (g j) := by
ext j
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, Category.assoc, piComparison_comp_π, ← G.map_comp,
limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_pt, Fan.mk_π_app]
/-- The comparison morphism for the coproduct of `f`. This is an iso iff `G` preserves the coproduct
of `f`, see `PreservesCoproduct.ofIsoComparison`. -/
def sigmaComparison [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] :
∐ (fun b => G.obj (f b)) ⟶ G.obj (∐ f) :=
Sigma.desc fun b => G.map (Sigma.ι f b)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_comp_sigmaComparison [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] (b : β) :
Sigma.ι _ b ≫ sigmaComparison G f = G.map (Sigma.ι f b) :=
colimit.ι_desc _ (Discrete.mk b)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem sigmaComparison_map_desc [HasCoproduct f] [HasCoproduct fun b => G.obj (f b)] (P : C)
(g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ P) :
sigmaComparison G f ≫ G.map (Sigma.desc g) = Sigma.desc fun j => G.map (g j) := by
ext j
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, ι_comp_sigmaComparison_assoc, ← G.map_comp, colimit.ι_desc,
Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app]
end Comparison
variable (C)
/-- An abbreviation for `Π J, HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete J) C` -/
abbrev HasProducts :=
∀ J : Type w, HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete J) C
/-- An abbreviation for `Π J, HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete J) C` -/
abbrev HasCoproducts :=
∀ J : Type w, HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete J) C
variable {C}
lemma hasProducts_shrink [HasProducts.{max w w'} C] : HasProducts.{w} C := fun J =>
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.equivalence Equiv.ulift : Discrete (ULift.{w'} J) ≌ _)
lemma hasCoproducts_shrink [HasCoproducts.{max w w'} C] : HasCoproducts.{w} C := fun J =>
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.equivalence Equiv.ulift : Discrete (ULift.{w'} J) ≌ _)
theorem has_smallest_products_of_hasProducts [HasProducts.{w} C] : HasProducts.{0} C :=
hasProducts_shrink
theorem has_smallest_coproducts_of_hasCoproducts [HasCoproducts.{w} C] : HasCoproducts.{0} C :=
hasCoproducts_shrink
theorem hasProducts_of_limit_fans (lf : ∀ {J : Type w} (f : J → C), Fan f)
(lf_isLimit : ∀ {J : Type w} (f : J → C), IsLimit (lf f)) : HasProducts.{w} C :=
fun _ : Type w =>
{ has_limit := fun F =>
HasLimit.mk
⟨(Cones.postcompose Discrete.natIsoFunctor.inv).obj (lf fun j => F.obj ⟨j⟩),
(IsLimit.postcomposeInvEquiv _ _).symm (lf_isLimit _)⟩ }
instance (priority := 100) hasProductsOfShape_of_hasProducts [HasProducts.{w} C] (J : Type w) :
HasProductsOfShape J C := inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproductsOfShape_of_hasCoproducts [HasCoproducts.{w} C]
(J : Type w) : HasCoproductsOfShape J C := inferInstance
open Opposite in
/-- The functor sending `(X, n)` to the product of copies of `X` indexed by `n`. -/
@[simps]
def piConst [Limits.HasProducts.{w} C] : C ⥤ Type wᵒᵖ ⥤ C where
obj X := { obj n := ∏ᶜ fun _ : (unop n) ↦ X, map f := Limits.Pi.map' f.unop fun _ ↦ 𝟙 _ }
map f := { app n := Limits.Pi.map fun _ ↦ f }
/-- `n ↦ ∏ₙ X` is left adjoint to `Hom(-, X)`. -/
def piConstAdj [Limits.HasProducts.{v} C] (X : C) :
(piConst.obj X).rightOp ⊣ yoneda.obj X where
unit := { app n i := Limits.Pi.π (fun _ : n ↦ X) i }
counit :=
{ app Y := (Limits.Pi.lift id).op,
naturality _ _ _ := by apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj; aesop_cat }
left_triangle_components _ := by apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj; aesop_cat
/-- The functor sending `(X, n)` to the coproduct of copies of `X` indexed by `n`. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaConst [Limits.HasCoproducts.{w} C] : C ⥤ Type w ⥤ C where
obj X := { obj n := ∐ fun _ : n ↦ X, map f := Limits.Sigma.map' f fun _ ↦ 𝟙 _ }
map f := { app n := Limits.Sigma.map fun _ ↦ f }
/-- `n ↦ ∐ₙ X` is left adjoint to `Hom(X, -)`. -/
def sigmaConstAdj [Limits.HasCoproducts.{v} C] (X : C) :
sigmaConst.obj X ⊣ coyoneda.obj (Opposite.op X) where
unit := { app n i := Limits.Sigma.ι (fun _ : n ↦ X) i }
counit := { app Y := Limits.Sigma.desc id }
/-!
(Co)products over a type with a unique term.
-/
section Unique
/-- The limit cone for the product over an index type with exactly one term. -/
@[simps]
def limitConeOfUnique [Unique β] (f : β → C) : LimitCone (Discrete.functor f) where
cone :=
{ pt := f default
π := Discrete.natTrans (fun ⟨j⟩ => eqToHom (by
dsimp
congr
subsingleton)) }
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => s.π.app default
fac := fun s j => by
have h := Subsingleton.elim j default
subst h
simp
uniq := fun s m w => by
specialize w default
simpa using w }
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_unique [Nonempty β] [Subsingleton β] (f : β → C) :
HasProduct f :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_unique β; HasLimit.mk (limitConeOfUnique f)
/-- A product over an index type with exactly one term is just the object over that term. -/
@[simps!]
def productUniqueIso [Unique β] (f : β → C) : ∏ᶜ f ≅ f default :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (limitConeOfUnique f).isLimit
/-- The colimit cocone for the coproduct over an index type with exactly one term. -/
@[simps]
def colimitCoconeOfUnique [Unique β] (f : β → C) : ColimitCocone (Discrete.functor f) where
cocone :=
{ pt := f default
ι := Discrete.natTrans (fun ⟨j⟩ => eqToHom (by
dsimp
congr
subsingleton)) }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => s.ι.app default
fac := fun s j => by
have h := Subsingleton.elim j default
subst h
apply Category.id_comp
uniq := fun s m w => by
specialize w default
erw [Category.id_comp] at w
exact w }
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_unique [Nonempty β] [Subsingleton β] (f : β → C) :
HasCoproduct f :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_unique β; HasColimit.mk (colimitCoconeOfUnique f)
/-- A coproduct over an index type with exactly one term is just the object over that term. -/
@[simps!]
def coproductUniqueIso [Unique β] (f : β → C) : ∐ f ≅ f default :=
| IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) (colimitCoconeOfUnique f).isColimit
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Products.lean | 773 | 774 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.PrimePow
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Nat
/-!
# Lemmas about squarefreeness of natural numbers
A number is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares except the squares of units.
## Main Results
- `Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList`: A positive natural number `x` is squarefree iff
the list `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
theorem squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ n.primeFactorsList.Nodup := by
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors h0, Nat.factors_eq]
simp
end Nat
theorem Squarefree.nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) : n.primeFactorsList.Nodup :=
(Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn.ne_zero).mp hn
namespace Nat
variable {s : Finset ℕ} {m n p : ℕ}
theorem squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ ∀ x, Prime x → ¬x * x ∣ n :=
squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible ⟨_, prime_two⟩
theorem _root_.Squarefree.natFactorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : Squarefree n) :
n.factorization p ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn')
· simp
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one] at hn
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have := hn p
rw [← multiplicity_eq_factorization hp hn']
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff, hp.ne_one, or_false] at this
exact multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le this
· rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
exact zero_le_one
lemma factorization_eq_one_of_squarefree (hn : Squarefree n) (hp : p.Prime) (hpn : p ∣ n) :
factorization n p = 1 :=
(hn.natFactorization_le_one _).antisymm <| (hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero).1 hpn
theorem squarefree_of_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hn' : ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1) :
Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn, List.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
intro a
rw [primeFactorsList_count_eq]
apply hn'
theorem squarefree_iff_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1 :=
⟨fun hn => hn.natFactorization_le_one, squarefree_of_factorization_le_one hn⟩
theorem Squarefree.ext_iff {n m : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hm : Squarefree m) :
n = m ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → (p ∣ n ↔ p ∣ m) := by
refine ⟨by rintro rfl; simp, fun h => eq_of_factorization_eq hn.ne_zero hm.ne_zero fun p => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have h₁ := h _ hp
rw [← not_iff_not, hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff,
hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hm.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff] at h₁
have h₂ := hn.natFactorization_le_one p
have h₃ := hm.natFactorization_le_one p
omega
rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp, factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
theorem squarefree_pow_iff {n k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Squarefree (n ^ k) ↔ Squarefree n ∧ k = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by rintro ⟨hn, rfl⟩; simpa⟩
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | -)
· simp [zero_pow hk] at h
refine ⟨h.squarefree_of_dvd (dvd_pow_self _ hk), by_contradiction fun h₁ => ?_⟩
have : 2 ≤ k := k.two_le_iff.mpr ⟨hk, h₁⟩
apply hn (Nat.isUnit_iff.1 (h _ _))
rw [← sq]
exact pow_dvd_pow _ this
theorem squarefree_and_prime_pow_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ∧ IsPrimePow n ↔ Prime n := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hn => ⟨hn.squarefree, hn.isPrimePow⟩⟩
rw [isPrimePow_nat_iff]
rintro ⟨h, p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk.ne'] at h
rwa [h.2, pow_one]
/-- Assuming that `n` has no factors less than `k`, returns the smallest prime `p` such that
`p^2 ∣ n`. -/
def minSqFacAux : ℕ → ℕ → Option ℕ
| n, k =>
if h : n < k * k then none
else
have : Nat.sqrt n - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k := by
exact Nat.minFac_lemma n k h
if k ∣ n then
let n' := n / k
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt <| Nat.div_le_self _ _) k) this
if k ∣ n' then some k else minSqFacAux n' (k + 2)
else minSqFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by n k => sqrt n + 2 - k
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor `p` of `n` such that `p^2 ∣ n`, or `none` if there is no
such `p` (that is, `n` is squarefree). See also `Nat.squarefree_iff_minSqFac`. -/
def minSqFac (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then
let n' := n / 2
if 2 ∣ n' then some 2 else minSqFacAux n' 3
else minSqFacAux n 3
/-- The correctness property of the return value of `minSqFac`.
* If `none`, then `n` is squarefree;
* If `some d`, then `d` is a minimal square factor of `n` -/
def MinSqFacProp (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ → Prop
| none => Squarefree n
| some d => Prime d ∧ d * d ∣ n ∧ ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → d ≤ p
theorem minSqFacProp_div (n) {k} (pk : Prime k) (dk : k ∣ n) (dkk : ¬k * k ∣ n) {o}
(H : MinSqFacProp (n / k) o) : MinSqFacProp n o := by
have : ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → k * (p * p) ∣ n := fun p pp dp =>
have :=
(coprime_primes pk pp).2 fun e => by
subst e
contradiction
(coprime_mul_iff_right.2 ⟨this, this⟩).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd dk dp
rcases o with - | d
· rw [MinSqFacProp, squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree] at H ⊢
exact fun p pp dp => H p pp ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 (this _ pp dp))
· obtain ⟨H1, H2, H3⟩ := H
simp only [dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk] at H2 H3
exact ⟨H1, dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) H2, fun p pp dp => H3 _ pp (this _ pp dp)⟩
theorem minSqFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (k) (n0 : 0 < n) (i) (e : k = 2 * i + 3)
(ih : ∀ m, Prime m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFacAux n k) := by
rw [minSqFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp only [h, ↓reduceDIte]
· refine squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.2 fun p pp d => ?_
have := ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)
have := Nat.mul_le_mul this this
exact not_le_of_lt h (le_trans this (le_of_dvd n0 d))
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by omega
have k0 : 0 < k := lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) k2
have IH : ∀ n', n' ∣ n → ¬k ∣ n' → MinSqFacProp n' (n'.minSqFacAux (k + 2)) := by
intro n' nd' nk
have hn' := le_of_dvd n0 nd'
refine
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt hn') _) (Nat.minFac_lemma n k h)
@minSqFacAux_has_prop n' (k + 2) (pos_of_dvd_of_pos nd' n0) (i + 1)
(by simp [e, left_distrib]) fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (ih m m2 (dvd_trans d nd')) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
change 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n' at d
have := ih _ prime_two (dvd_trans (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d) nd')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by omega)
have pk : k ∣ n → Prime k := by
refine fun dk => prime_def_minFac.2 ⟨k2, le_antisymm (minFac_le k0) ?_⟩
exact ih _ (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt k2)) (dvd_trans (minFac_dvd _) dk)
split_ifs with dk dkk
· exact ⟨pk dk, (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).1 dkk, fun p pp d => ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)⟩
· specialize IH (n / k) (div_dvd_of_dvd dk) dkk
exact minSqFacProp_div _ (pk dk) dk (mt (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 dkk) IH
· exact IH n (dvd_refl _) dk
termination_by n.sqrt + 2 - k
theorem minSqFac_has_prop (n : ℕ) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFac n) := by
dsimp only [minSqFac]; split_ifs with d2 d4
· exact ⟨prime_two, (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).1 d4, fun p pp _ => pp.two_le⟩
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d4 (by decide)
refine minSqFacProp_div _ prime_two d2 (mt (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).2 d4) ?_
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop 3 (Nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd n0 d2) (by decide)) 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d2 (by decide)
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop _ n0 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
theorem minSqFac_prime {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : Prime d := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.1
theorem minSqFac_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : d * d ∣ n := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.2.1
theorem minSqFac_le_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) {m} (m2 : 2 ≤ m) (md : m * m ∣ n) :
d ≤ m := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n; rw [h] at this
have fd := minFac_dvd m
exact
le_trans (this.2.2 _ (minFac_prime <| ne_of_gt m2) (dvd_trans (mul_dvd_mul fd fd) md))
(minFac_le <| lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) m2)
theorem squarefree_iff_minSqFac {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ n.minSqFac = none := by
| have := minSqFac_has_prop n
constructor <;> intro H
· rcases e : n.minSqFac with - | d
· rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Squarefree.lean | 223 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.MapComap
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Convergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.PartitionFiltration
/-!
# Kernel density
Let `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `ν : Kernel α γ` be two finite kernels with `Kernel.fst κ ≤ ν`,
where `γ` has a countably generated σ-algebra (true in particular for standard Borel spaces).
We build a function `density κ ν : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` jointly measurable in the first two arguments
such that for all `a : α` and all measurable sets `s : Set β` and `A : Set γ`,
`∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s)`.
There are two main applications of this construction.
* Disintegration of kernels: for `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)`, we want to build a kernel
`η : Kernel (α × γ) β` such that `κ = fst κ ⊗ₖ η`. For `β = ℝ`, we can use the density of `κ`
with respect to `fst κ` for intervals to build a kernel cumulative distribution function for `η`.
The construction can then be extended to `β` standard Borel.
* Radon-Nikodym theorem for kernels: for `κ ν : Kernel α γ`, we can use the density to build a
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `κ` with respect to `ν`. We don't need `β` here but we can apply the
density construction to `β = Unit`. The derivative construction will use `density` but will not
be exactly equal to it because we will want to remove the `fst κ ≤ ν` assumption.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.density`: for `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `ν : Kernel α γ` two finite
kernels, `Kernel.density κ ν` is a function `α → γ → Set β → ℝ`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.setIntegral_density`: for all measurable sets `A : Set γ` and
`s : Set β`, `∫ x in A, Kernel.density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurable_density`: the function
`p : α × γ ↦ Kernel.density κ ν p.1 p.2 s` is measurable.
## Construction of the density
If we were interested only in a fixed `a : α`, then we could use the Radon-Nikodym derivative to
build the density function `density κ ν`, as follows.
```
def density' (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : kernel a γ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) : ℝ :=
(((κ a).restrict (univ ×ˢ s)).fst.rnDeriv (ν a) x).toReal
```
However, we can't turn those functions for each `a` into a measurable function of the pair `(a, x)`.
In order to obtain measurability through countability, we use the fact that the measurable space `γ`
is countably generated. For each `n : ℕ`, we define (in the file
`Mathlib.Probability.Process.PartitionFiltration`) a finite partition of `γ`, such that those
partitions are finer as `n` grows, and the σ-algebra generated by the union of all partitions is the
σ-algebra of `γ`. For `x : γ`, `countablePartitionSet n x` denotes the set in the partition such
that `x ∈ countablePartitionSet n x`.
For a given `n`, the function `densityProcess κ ν n : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` defined by
`fun a x s ↦ (κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)).toReal` has
the desired property that `∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a (A ×ˢ s)).toReal` for
all `A` in the σ-algebra generated by the partition at scale `n` and is measurable in `(a, x)`.
`countableFiltration γ` is the filtration of those σ-algebras for all `n : ℕ`.
The functions `densityProcess κ ν n` described here are a bounded `ν`-martingale for the filtration
`countableFiltration γ`. By Doob's martingale L1 convergence theorem, that martingale converges to
a limit, which has a product-measurable version and satisfies the integral equality for all `A` in
`⨆ n, countableFiltration γ n`. Finally, the partitions were chosen such that that supremum is equal
to the σ-algebra on `γ`, hence the equality holds for all measurable sets.
We have obtained the desired density function.
## References
The construction of the density process in this file follows the proof of Theorem 9.27 in
[O. Kallenberg, Foundations of modern probability][kallenberg2021], adapted to use a countably
generated hypothesis instead of specializing to `ℝ`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
[CountablyGenerated γ] {κ : Kernel α (γ × β)} {ν : Kernel α γ}
section DensityProcess
/-- An `ℕ`-indexed martingale that is a density for `κ` with respect to `ν` on the sets in
`countablePartition γ n`. Used to define its limit `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.density`, which is
a density for those kernels for all measurable sets. -/
noncomputable
def densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
ℝ :=
(κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)).toReal
lemma densityProcess_def (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
(fun t ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a t s)
= fun t ↦ (κ a (countablePartitionSet n t ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n t)).toReal :=
rfl
lemma measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
(n : ℕ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)] (fun (p : α × γ) ↦
κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) := by
change Measurable[mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)]
((fun (p : α × countablePartition γ n) ↦ κ p.1 (↑p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 p.2)
∘ (fun (p : α × γ) ↦ (p.1, ⟨countablePartitionSet n p.2, countablePartitionSet_mem n p.2⟩)))
have h1 : @Measurable _ _ (mα.prod ⊤) _
(fun p : α × countablePartition γ n ↦ κ p.1 (↑p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 p.2) := by
refine Measurable.div ?_ ?_
· refine measurable_from_prod_countable (fun t ↦ ?_)
exact Kernel.measurable_coe _ ((measurableSet_countablePartition _ t.prop).prod hs)
· refine measurable_from_prod_countable ?_
rintro ⟨t, ht⟩
exact Kernel.measurable_coe _ (measurableSet_countablePartition _ ht)
refine h1.comp (measurable_fst.prodMk ?_)
change @Measurable (α × γ) (countablePartition γ n) (mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)) ⊤
((fun c ↦ ⟨countablePartitionSet n c, countablePartitionSet_mem n c⟩) ∘ (fun p : α × γ ↦ p.2))
exact (measurable_countablePartitionSet_subtype n ⊤).comp measurable_snd
lemma measurable_densityProcess_aux (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × γ) ↦
κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) := by
refine Measurable.mono (measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux κ ν n hs) ?_ le_rfl
exact sup_le_sup le_rfl (comap_mono ((countableFiltration γ).le _))
lemma measurable_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × γ) ↦ densityProcess κ ν n p.1 p.2 s) :=
(measurable_densityProcess_aux κ ν n hs).ennreal_toReal
-- The following two lemmas also work without the `( :)`, but they are slow.
lemma measurable_densityProcess_left (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(x : γ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun a ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
((measurable_densityProcess κ ν n hs).comp (measurable_id.prodMk measurable_const):)
lemma measurable_densityProcess_right (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
((measurable_densityProcess κ ν n hs).comp (measurable_const.prodMk measurable_id):)
lemma measurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[countableFiltration γ n] (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) := by
refine @Measurable.ennreal_toReal _ (countableFiltration γ n) _ ?_
exact (measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux κ ν n hs).comp measurable_prodMk_left
lemma stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable[countableFiltration γ n] (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
(measurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν n a hs).stronglyMeasurable
lemma adapted_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (a : α)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Adapted (countableFiltration γ) (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
fun n ↦ stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν n a hs
lemma densityProcess_nonneg (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
0 ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
lemma meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
(s : Set β) :
κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) := by
calc κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s)
≤ fst κ a (countablePartitionSet n x) := by
rw [fst_apply' _ _ (measurableSet_countablePartitionSet _ _)]
refine measure_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
_ ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) := hκν a _
lemma densityProcess_le_one (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ 1 := by
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal zero_le_one (ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul]
exact meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s
lemma eLpNorm_densityProcess_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
eLpNorm (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) 1 (ν a) ≤ ν a univ := by
refine (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound (C := 1) (ae_of_all _ (fun x ↦ ?_))).trans ?_
· simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (densityProcess_nonneg κ ν n a x s),
densityProcess_le_one hκν n a x s]
· simp
lemma integrable_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν] (n : ℕ)
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a) := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
refine ⟨Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable ?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_densityProcess_right κ ν n a hs
· exact (eLpNorm_densityProcess_le hκν n a s).trans_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess_of_mem (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [hν : IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {u : Set γ}
(hu : u ∈ countablePartition γ n) :
∫ x in u, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (u ×ˢ s) := by
have : IsFiniteKernel κ := isFiniteKernel_of_isFiniteKernel_fst (h := isFiniteKernel_of_le hκν)
have hu_meas : MeasurableSet u := measurableSet_countablePartition n hu
simp_rw [densityProcess]
rw [integral_toReal]
rotate_left
· refine Measurable.aemeasurable ?_
change Measurable ((fun (p : α × _) ↦ κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s)
/ ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) ∘ (fun x ↦ (a, x)))
exact (measurable_densityProcess_aux κ ν n hs).comp measurable_prodMk_left
· refine ae_of_all _ (fun x ↦ ?_)
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· suffices κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) = 0 by simp [h0, this]
have h0' : fst κ a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((hκν a _).trans h0.le) zero_le'
rw [fst_apply' _ _ (measurableSet_countablePartitionSet _ _)] at h0'
refine measure_mono_null (fun x ↦ ?_) h0'
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
· exact ENNReal.div_lt_top (measure_ne_top _ _) h0
congr
have : ∫⁻ x in u, κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) ∂(ν a)
= ∫⁻ _ in u, κ a (u ×ˢ s) / ν a u ∂(ν a) := by
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hu_meas (ae_of_all _ (fun t ht ↦ ?_))
rw [countablePartitionSet_of_mem hu ht]
rw [this]
simp only [MeasureTheory.lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
by_cases h0 : ν a u = 0
· simp only [h0, mul_zero]
have h0' : fst κ a u = 0 := le_antisymm ((hκν a _).trans h0.le) zero_le'
rw [fst_apply' _ _ hu_meas] at h0'
refine (measure_mono_null ?_ h0').symm
intro p
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0, mul_one]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {A : Set γ}
(hA : MeasurableSet[countableFiltration γ n] A) :
∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s) := by
have : IsFiniteKernel κ := isFiniteKernel_of_isFiniteKernel_fst (h := isFiniteKernel_of_le hκν)
obtain ⟨S, hS_subset, rfl⟩ := (measurableSet_generateFrom_countablePartition_iff _ _).mp hA
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
have h_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun i : S ↦ (i : Set γ)) := by
intro u v huv
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16
Previously `Function.onFun` unfolded in the following `simp only`,
but now needs a `rw`.
This may be a bug: a no import minimization may be required.
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Function.onFun] -/
rw [Function.onFun]
refine disjoint_countablePartition (hS_subset (by simp)) (hS_subset (by simp)) ?_
rwa [ne_eq, ← Subtype.ext_iff]
rw [integral_iUnion, iUnion_prod_const, measureReal_def, measure_iUnion,
ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq (fun _ ↦ measure_ne_top _ _)]
· congr with u
rw [setIntegral_densityProcess_of_mem hκν _ _ hs (hS_subset (by simp))]
rfl
· intro u v huv
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Set.disjoint_prod, disjoint_self, bot_eq_empty]
exact Or.inl (h_disj huv)
· exact fun _ ↦ (measurableSet_countablePartition n (hS_subset (by simp))).prod hs
· exact fun _ ↦ measurableSet_countablePartition n (hS_subset (by simp))
· exact h_disj
· exact (integrable_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs).integrableOn
lemma integral_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (univ ×ˢ s) := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs MeasurableSet.univ]
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess_of_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν)
[IsFiniteKernel ν] {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{A : Set γ} (hA : MeasurableSet[countableFiltration γ n] A) :
∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν m a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s) :=
setIntegral_densityProcess hκν m a hs ((countableFiltration γ).mono hnm A hA)
lemma condExp_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i ≤ j) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(ν a)[fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν j a x s | countableFiltration γ i]
=ᵐ[ν a] fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν i a x s := by
refine (ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· exact integrable_densityProcess hκν j a hs
· exact fun _ _ _ ↦ (integrable_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs).integrableOn
· intro x hx _
rw [setIntegral_densityProcess hκν i a hs hx,
setIntegral_densityProcess_of_le hκν hij a hs hx]
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν i a hs)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_densityProcess := condExp_densityProcess
lemma martingale_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Martingale (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (countableFiltration γ) (ν a) :=
⟨adapted_densityProcess κ ν a hs, fun _ _ h ↦ condExp_densityProcess hκν h a hs⟩
lemma densityProcess_mono_set (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
{s s' : Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s' := by
unfold densityProcess
obtain h₀ | h₀ := eq_or_ne (ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)) 0
· simp [h₀]
· gcongr
simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h₀, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
exact eq_top_mono (meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s')
lemma densityProcess_mono_kernel_left {κ' : Kernel α (γ × β)} (hκκ' : κ ≤ κ')
(hκ'ν : fst κ' ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ' ν n a x s := by
unfold densityProcess
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· rw [h0, ENNReal.toReal_div, ENNReal.toReal_div]
simp
have h_le : κ' a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) :=
meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκ'ν n a x s
gcongr
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h0, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
exact fun h_top ↦ eq_top_mono h_le h_top
· apply hκκ'
lemma densityProcess_antitone_kernel_right {ν' : Kernel α γ}
(hνν' : ν ≤ ν') (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν' n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s := by
unfold densityProcess
have h_le : κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) :=
meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· simp [le_antisymm (h_le.trans h0.le) zero_le', h0]
gcongr
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h0, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
exact fun h_top ↦ eq_top_mono h_le h_top
· apply hνν'
@[simp]
lemma densityProcess_empty (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x ∅ = 0 := by
simp [densityProcess]
lemma tendsto_densityProcess_atTop_empty_of_antitone (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
[IsFiniteKernel κ] (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
(seq : ℕ → Set β) (hseq : Antitone seq) (hseq_iInter : ⋂ i, seq i = ∅)
(hseq_meas : ∀ m, MeasurableSet (seq m)) :
Tendsto (fun m ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x (seq m)) atTop
(𝓝 (densityProcess κ ν n a x ∅)) := by
simp_rw [densityProcess]
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· simp_rw [h0, ENNReal.toReal_div]
simp
refine (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal ?_).comp ?_
· rw [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top]
push_neg
simp
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const ?_ (.inr h0)
have : Tendsto (fun m ↦ κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ seq m)) atTop
(𝓝 ((κ a) (⋂ n_1, countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ seq n_1))) := by
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop
· measurability
· exact fun _ _ h ↦ prod_mono_right <| hseq h
· exact ⟨0, measure_ne_top _ _⟩
simpa only [← prod_iInter, hseq_iInter] using this
lemma tendsto_densityProcess_atTop_of_antitone (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
[IsFiniteKernel κ] (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
(seq : ℕ → Set β) (hseq : Antitone seq) (hseq_iInter : ⋂ i, seq i = ∅)
(hseq_meas : ∀ m, MeasurableSet (seq m)) :
Tendsto (fun m ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x (seq m)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← densityProcess_empty κ ν n a x]
exact tendsto_densityProcess_atTop_empty_of_antitone κ ν n a x seq hseq hseq_iInter hseq_meas
lemma tendsto_densityProcess_limitProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν)
[IsFiniteKernel ν] (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂(ν a), Tendsto (fun n ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) atTop
(𝓝 ((countableFiltration γ).limitProcess
(fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a) x)) := by
refine Submartingale.ae_tendsto_limitProcess (martingale_densityProcess hκν a hs).submartingale
(R := (ν a univ).toNNReal) (fun n ↦ ?_)
refine (eLpNorm_densityProcess_le hκν n a s).trans_eq ?_
rw [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
lemma memL1_limitProcess_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp ((countableFiltration γ).limitProcess
(fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a)) 1 (ν a) := by
refine Submartingale.memLp_limitProcess (martingale_densityProcess hκν a hs).submartingale
(R := (ν a univ).toNNReal) (fun n ↦ ?_)
refine (eLpNorm_densityProcess_le hκν n a s).trans_eq ?_
rw [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
lemma tendsto_eLpNorm_one_densityProcess_limitProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ eLpNorm ((fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s)
- (countableFiltration γ).limitProcess (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a))
1 (ν a)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine Submartingale.tendsto_eLpNorm_one_limitProcess ?_ ?_
· exact (martingale_densityProcess hκν a hs).submartingale
· refine uniformIntegrable_of le_rfl ENNReal.one_ne_top ?_ ?_
· exact fun n ↦ (measurable_densityProcess_right κ ν n a hs).aestronglyMeasurable
· refine fun ε _ ↦ ⟨2, fun n ↦ le_of_eq_of_le ?_ (?_ : 0 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε)⟩
· suffices {x | 2 ≤ ‖densityProcess κ ν n a x s‖₊} = ∅ by simp [this]
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
refine (?_ : _ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0)).trans_lt one_lt_two
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (densityProcess_nonneg _ _ _ _ _ _)]
exact mod_cast (densityProcess_le_one hκν _ _ _ _)
· simp
lemma tendsto_eLpNorm_one_restrict_densityProcess_limitProcess [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (A : Set γ) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ eLpNorm ((fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s)
- (countableFiltration γ).limitProcess (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a))
1 ((ν a).restrict A)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_eLpNorm_one_densityProcess_limitProcess hκν a hs) (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ eLpNorm_restrict_le _ _ _ _)
end DensityProcess
section Density
/-- Density of the kernel `κ` with respect to `ν`. This is a function `α → γ → Set β → ℝ` which
is measurable on `α × γ` for all measurable sets `s : Set β` and satisfies that
`∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s)` for all measurable `A : Set γ`. -/
noncomputable
def density (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) : ℝ :=
limsup (fun n ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) atTop
lemma density_ae_eq_limitProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(fun x ↦ density κ ν a x s)
=ᵐ[ν a] (countableFiltration γ).limitProcess
(fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a) := by
filter_upwards [tendsto_densityProcess_limitProcess hκν a hs] with t ht using ht.limsup_eq
lemma tendsto_m_density (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂(ν a),
Tendsto (fun n ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) atTop (𝓝 (density κ ν a x s)) := by
filter_upwards [tendsto_densityProcess_limitProcess hκν a hs, density_ae_eq_limitProcess hκν a hs]
with t h1 h2 using h2 ▸ h1
lemma measurable_density (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × γ) ↦ density κ ν p.1 p.2 s) :=
.limsup (fun n ↦ measurable_densityProcess κ ν n hs)
lemma measurable_density_left (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (x : γ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun a ↦ density κ ν a x s) := by
change Measurable ((fun (p : α × γ) ↦ density κ ν p.1 p.2 s) ∘ (fun a ↦ (a, x)))
exact (measurable_density κ ν hs).comp measurable_prodMk_right
lemma measurable_density_right (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x ↦ density κ ν a x s) := by
change Measurable ((fun (p : α × γ) ↦ density κ ν p.1 p.2 s) ∘ (fun x ↦ (a, x)))
exact (measurable_density κ ν hs).comp measurable_prodMk_left
lemma density_mono_set (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) (x : γ) {s s' : Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
density κ ν a x s ≤ density κ ν a x s' := by
refine limsup_le_limsup ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ densityProcess_mono_set hκν n a x h)
· exact isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le atTop (fun i ↦ densityProcess_nonneg _ _ _ _ _ _)
· exact isBoundedUnder_of ⟨1, fun n ↦ densityProcess_le_one hκν _ _ _ _⟩
lemma density_nonneg (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
0 ≤ density κ ν a x s := by
refine le_limsup_of_frequently_le ?_ ?_
· exact Frequently.of_forall (fun n ↦ densityProcess_nonneg _ _ _ _ _ _)
· exact isBoundedUnder_of ⟨1, fun n ↦ densityProcess_le_one hκν _ _ _ _⟩
lemma density_le_one (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
density κ ν a x s ≤ 1 := by
refine limsup_le_of_le ?_ ?_
· exact isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le atTop (fun i ↦ densityProcess_nonneg _ _ _ _ _ _)
· exact Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ densityProcess_le_one hκν _ _ _ _)
section Integral
lemma eLpNorm_density_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
eLpNorm (fun x ↦ density κ ν a x s) 1 (ν a) ≤ ν a univ := by
refine (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound (C := 1) (ae_of_all _ (fun t ↦ ?_))).trans ?_
· simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (density_nonneg hκν a t s),
density_le_one hκν a t s]
· simp
lemma integrable_density (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ density κ ν a x s) (ν a) := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
refine ⟨Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable ?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_density_right κ ν hs a
· exact (eLpNorm_density_le hκν a s).trans_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν)
[IsFiniteKernel ν] (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (A : Set γ) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν i a x s ∂(ν a)) atTop
(𝓝 (∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a))) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' (μ := ν a) (fun x ↦ density κ ν a x s)
(integrable_density hκν a hs) (F := fun i x ↦ densityProcess κ ν i a x s) (l := atTop)
(Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ integrable_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs)) ?_ A
refine (tendsto_congr fun n ↦ ?_).mp (tendsto_eLpNorm_one_densityProcess_limitProcess hκν a hs)
refine eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_
exact EventuallyEq.rfl.sub (density_ae_eq_limitProcess hκν a hs).symm
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `setIntegral_density`. -/
lemma setIntegral_density_of_measurableSet (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν)
[IsFiniteKernel ν] (n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {A : Set γ}
(hA : MeasurableSet[countableFiltration γ n] A) :
∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s) := by
suffices ∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = ∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) by
exact this ▸ setIntegral_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs hA
suffices ∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a)
= limsup (fun i ↦ ∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν i a x s ∂(ν a)) atTop by
rw [this, ← limsup_const (α := ℕ) (f := atTop) (∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a)),
limsup_congr]
simp only [eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm ↦ ?_⟩
rw [setIntegral_densityProcess_of_le hκν hnm _ hs hA,
setIntegral_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs hA]
| -- use L1 convergence
have h := tendsto_setIntegral_densityProcess hκν a hs A
rw [h.limsup_eq]
lemma integral_density (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (univ ×ˢ s) := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_density_of_measurableSet hκν 0 a hs MeasurableSet.univ]
lemma setIntegral_density (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Density.lean | 526 | 535 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
| theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 949 | 950 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
theorem setToL1_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← (setToL1 hT).map_sub]
exact setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
theorem norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) * ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by
refine
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_extend_le (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) (coeToLp α E ℝ)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) fun x => le_of_eq ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
simp [coeToLp]
_ = ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le hT hC) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hC
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le' hT) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem norm_setToL1_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC)
theorem norm_setToL1_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT)
theorem setToL1_lipschitz (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) (setToL1 hT) :=
(setToL1 hT).lipschitz.weaken (norm_setToL1_le' hT)
/-- If `fs i → f` in `L1`, then `setToL1 hT (fs i) → setToL1 hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) {ι}
(fs : ι → α →₁[μ] E) {l : Filter ι} (hfs : Tendsto fs l (𝓝 f)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToL1 hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToL1 hT f) :=
((setToL1 hT).continuous.tendsto _).comp hfs
end SetToL1
end L1
section Function
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ} {f g : α → E}
variable (μ T)
open Classical in
/-- Extend `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α → E) → F` (for integrable functions `α → E`). We set it to
0 if the function is not integrable. -/
def setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) else 0
variable {μ T}
theorem setToFun_eq (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) :=
dif_pos hf
theorem L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (L1.integrable_coeFn f), Integrable.toL1_coeFn]
theorem setToFun_undef (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
theorem setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_undef hT (not_and_of_not_left _ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias setToFun_non_aEStronglyMeasurable := setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem setToFun_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left' T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (T + T') (hT.add hT') f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left hT hT']
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T'' hT'' f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (fun s => c • T s) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left hT c]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T' hT' f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left' hT hT' c h_smul]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
rw [Pi.zero_def, setToFun_eq hT (integrable_zero _ _ _)]
simp only [← Pi.zero_def]
rw [Integrable.toL1_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero_left {hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C} :
setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left hT _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left' hT h_zero _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (hf.add hg), setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hg, Integrable.toL1_add,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_add]
theorem setToFun_finset_sum' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
classical
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro _
simp only [setToFun_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
rw [setToFun_add hT (hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)) _]
· rw [ih fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
· convert integrable_finset_sum s fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) with x
simp
theorem setToFun_finset_sum (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
convert setToFun_finset_sum' hT s hf with a; simp
theorem setToFun_neg (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT (-f) = -setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hf.neg, Integrable.toL1_neg,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_neg]
· rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT, neg_zero]
rwa [← integrable_neg_iff] at hf
theorem setToFun_sub (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, setToFun_add hT hf hg.neg, setToFun_neg hT g]
theorem setToFun_smul [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT, Integrable.toL1_smul',
L1.setToL1_smul hT h_smul c _]
· by_cases hr : c = 0
· rw [hr]; simp
· have hf' : ¬Integrable (c • f) μ := by rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT hf', smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_congr_ae (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· have hgi : Integrable g μ := hfi.congr h
rw [setToFun_eq hT hfi, setToFun_eq hT hgi, (Integrable.toL1_eq_toL1_iff f g hfi hgi).2 h]
· have hgi : ¬Integrable g μ := by rw [integrable_congr h] at hfi; exact hfi
rw [setToFun_undef hT hfi, setToFun_undef hT hgi]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : μ = 0) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by simp [h, EventuallyEq]
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT this, setToFun_zero]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → μ s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_zero_left' hT fun s hs hμs => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero hs (h s hs hμs)
theorem setToFun_toL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (hf.toL1 f) = setToFun μ T hT f :=
setToFun_congr_ae hT hf.coeFn_toL1
theorem setToFun_indicator_const (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToFun μ T hT (s.indicator fun _ => x) = T s x := by
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ hs hμs x).symm]
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]
exact L1.setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT hs hμs x
theorem setToFun_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun _ => x) = T univ x := by
have : (fun _ : α => x) = Set.indicator univ fun _ => x := (indicator_univ _).symm
rw [this]
exact setToFun_indicator_const hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToFun_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf]; exact L1.setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' hTT' _
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f :=
setToFun_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToFun_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α → G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hfi]
refine L1.setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg ?_
rw [← Lp.coeFn_le]
have h0 := Lp.coeFn_zero G' 1 μ
have h := Integrable.coeFn_toL1 hfi
filter_upwards [h0, h, hf] with _ h0a ha hfa
rw [h0a, ha]
exact hfa
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hfi, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α → G'}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← setToFun_sub hT hg hf]
refine setToFun_nonneg hT hT_nonneg (hfg.mono fun a ha => ?_)
rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ha
end Order
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ T hT f := by
simp_rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]; exact ContinuousLinearMap.continuous _
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `setToFun μ T hT (F i) → setToFun μ T hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (f : α → E)
(hfi : Integrable f μ) {fs : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} (hfsi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (fs i) μ)
(hfs : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖fs i x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
classical
let f_lp := hfi.toL1 f
let F_lp i := if hFi : Integrable (fs i) μ then hFi.toL1 (fs i) else 0
have tendsto_L1 : Tendsto F_lp l (𝓝 f_lp) := by
rw [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm']
simp_rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp hfs
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hi.coeFn_toL1, hfi.coeFn_toL1] with x hxi hxf
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi, hxi, f_lp, hxf]
suffices Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (F_lp i)) l (𝓝 (setToFun μ T hT f)) by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp this
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
| suffices h_ae_eq : F_lp i =ᵐ[μ] fs i from setToFun_congr_ae hT h_ae_eq
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi]
exact hi.coeFn_toL1
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT hfi.coeFn_toL1.symm]
exact ((continuous_setToFun hT).tendsto f_lp).comp tendsto_L1
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 854 | 860 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basis
/-!
# Rank of various constructions
## Main statements
- `rank_quotient_add_rank_le` : `rank M/N + rank N ≤ rank M`.
- `lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod`: `rank M × N ≤ rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_span_le_of_finite`: `rank (span s) ≤ #s` for finite `s`.
For free modules, we have
- `rank_prod` : `rank M × N = rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_finsupp` : `rank (ι →₀ M) = #ι * rank M`
- `rank_directSum`: `rank (⨁ Mᵢ) = ∑ rank Mᵢ`
- `rank_tensorProduct`: `rank (M ⊗ N) = rank M * rank N`.
Lemmas for ranks of submodules and subalgebras are also provided.
We have finrank variants for most lemmas as well.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u u' v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type u'} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Basis Cardinal DirectSum Function Module Set Submodule
section Quotient
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M]
theorem LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
{M' : Submodule R M} {ι₁ ι₂} {f : ι₁ → M'} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) (g : ι₂ → M)
(hg : LinearIndependent R (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := M') ∘ g)) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (f · : ι₁ → M) g) := by
refine .sum_type (hf.map' M'.subtype M'.ker_subtype) (.of_comp M'.mkQ hg) ?_
refine disjoint_def.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
have : x ∈ M' := span_le.mpr (Set.range_subset_iff.mpr fun i ↦ (f i).prop) h₁
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp.mp h₂
simp_rw [← Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← mkQ_apply, map_finsuppSum, map_smul, mkQ_apply] at this
rw [linearIndependent_iff.mp hg _ this, Finsupp.sum_zero_index]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias LinearIndependent.sum_elim_of_quotient := LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_of_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t) : LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
apply hs.union ht.of_comp
convert (Submodule.range_ker_disjoint ht).symm
· simp
aesop
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient {M' : Submodule R M}
{s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ M') (hs' : LinearIndepOn R id s) {t : Set M}
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ M') t) : LinearIndepOn R id (s ∪ t) :=
hs'.union_of_quotient <| by
rw [image_id]
exact ht.of_comp ((span R s).mapQ M' (LinearMap.id) (span_le.2 hs))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient :=
LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient
theorem linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) ↔
LinearIndepOn R f s ∧ LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.union_of_quotient h.2⟩
· exact h.mono subset_union_left
apply (h.mono subset_union_right).map
simpa [← image_eq_range] using ((linearIndepOn_union_iff hst).1 h).2.2.symm
theorem LinearIndepOn.quotient_iff_union {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t ↔ LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
rw [linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient hst, and_iff_right hs]
theorem rank_quotient_add_rank_le [Nontrivial R] (M' : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ M') + Module.rank R M' ≤ Module.rank R M := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R (M ⧸ M')
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M'
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
refine ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ?_
choose f hf using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective M'
simpa [add_comm] using (LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient ht (fun (i : s) ↦ f i)
(by simpa [Function.comp_def, hf] using hs)).cardinal_le_rank
theorem rank_quotient_le (p : Submodule R M) : Module.rank R (M ⧸ p) ≤ Module.rank R M :=
(mkQ p).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_quotient_le [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Finite R M]
(s : Submodule R M) : finrank R (M ⧸ s) ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat ((Submodule.mkQ s).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
end Quotient
variable [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
variable [Module R M]
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem rank_ulift : Module.rank R (ULift.{w} M) = Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) :=
Cardinal.lift_injective.{v} <| Eq.symm <| (lift_lift _).trans ULift.moduleEquiv.symm.lift_rank_eq
@[simp]
theorem finrank_ulift : finrank R (ULift M) = finrank R M := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_ulift, toNat_lift]
end ULift
section Prod
variable (R M M')
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M']
theorem rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ ≤ Module.rank R (M × M₁) := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M₁
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦
(linearIndependent_inl_union_inr' hs ht).cardinal_le_rank
theorem lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') ≤ Module.rank R (M × M') := by
rw [← rank_ulift, ← rank_ulift]
exact (rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod R _).trans_eq
(ULift.moduleEquiv.prodCongr ULift.moduleEquiv).rank_eq
variable {R M M'}
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M'] [Module.Free R M₁]
open Module.Free
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free, then the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M).lift + (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_prod : Module.rank R (M × M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} (Module.rank R M') := by
simpa [rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M', lift_umax]
using ((chooseBasis R M).prod (chooseBasis R M')).mk_eq_rank.symm
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free (and lie in the same universe), the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M) + (Module.rank R M')`. -/
theorem rank_prod' : Module.rank R (M × M₁) = Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ := by simp
/-- The finrank of `M × M'` is `(finrank R M) + (finrank R M')`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_prod [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M'] :
finrank R (M × M') = finrank R M + finrank R M' := by
simp [finrank, rank_lt_aleph0 R M, rank_lt_aleph0 R M']
end Prod
section Finsupp
variable (R M M')
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
open Module.Free
@[simp]
theorem rank_finsupp (ι : Type w) :
Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι * Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bs⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← bs.mk_eq_rank'', ← (Finsupp.basis fun _ : ι => bs).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_sigma,
Cardinal.sum_const]
theorem rank_finsupp' (ι : Type v) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = #ι * Module.rank R M := by
simp [rank_finsupp]
/-- The rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `(#ι).lift`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self (ι : Type w) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} #ι := by
simp
/-- If `R` and `ι` lie in the same universe, the rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `# ι`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self' {ι : Type u} : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = #ι := by simp
/-- The rank of the direct sum is the sum of the ranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_directSum {ι : Type v} (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] :
Module.rank R (⨁ i, M i) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (M i) := by
let B i := chooseBasis R (M i)
let b : Basis _ R (⨁ i, M i) := DFinsupp.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(#m).lift * (#n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_matrix_module (m : Type w) (n : Type w') [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v w'} #m * lift.{max v w} #n * lift.{max w w'} (Module.rank R M) := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
cases nonempty_fintype n
obtain ⟨I, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← (b.matrix m n).mk_eq_rank'']
simp only [mk_prod, lift_mul, lift_lift, ← mul_assoc, b.mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a
module `M` is `(#m * #n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp high]
theorem rank_matrix_module' (m n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v} (#m * #n) * lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, lift_mul, lift_umax.{w, v}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices is `(#m).lift * (#n).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix (m : Type v) (n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) =
Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, v} #m * Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, w} #n := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, rank_self, lift_one, mul_one, ← lift_lift.{v, max u w}, lift_id,
← lift_lift.{w, max u v}, lift_id]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices is
`(#n * #m).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix' (m n : Type v) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (#m * #n) := by
rw [rank_matrix, lift_mul, lift_umax.{v, u}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe as `R`, the rank of `m × n` matrices
is `# m * # n`. -/
theorem rank_matrix'' (m n : Type u) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = #m * #n := by simp
open Fintype
namespace Module
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ M) = card ι * finrank R M := by
rw [finrank, finrank, rank_finsupp, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_mul, toNat_lift, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp_self {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ R) = card ι := by
rw [finrank, rank_finsupp_self, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of the direct sum is the sum of the finranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_directSum {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Finite R (M i)] :
finrank R (⨁ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simp only [finrank, fun i => rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R (M i), rank_directSum, ← mk_sigma,
mk_toNat_eq_card, card_sigma]
/-- If `m` and `n` are `Fintype`, the finrank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(Fintype.card m) * (Fintype.card n) * finrank R M`. -/
theorem finrank_matrix (m n : Type*) [Fintype m] [Fintype n] :
finrank R (Matrix m n M) = card m * card n * finrank R M := by simp [finrank]
end Module
end Finsupp
section Pi
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (φ i)] [∀ i, Module R (φ i)] [∀ i, Module.Free R (φ i)]
open Module.Free
open LinearMap
/-- The rank of a finite product of free modules is the sum of the ranks. -/
-- this result is not true without the freeness assumption
@[simp]
theorem rank_pi [Finite η] : Module.rank R (∀ i, φ i) =
Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (φ i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype η
let B i := chooseBasis R (φ i)
let b : Basis _ R (∀ i, φ i) := Pi.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
variable (R)
/-- The finrank of `(ι → R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_pi {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] :
finrank R (ι → R) = Fintype.card ι := by
simp [finrank]
--TODO: this should follow from `LinearEquiv.finrank_eq`, that is over a field.
/-- The finrank of a finite product is the sum of the finranks. -/
theorem Module.finrank_pi_fintype
{ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] {M : ι → Type w} [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Finite R (M i)] :
finrank R (∀ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simp only [finrank, fun i => rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R (M i), rank_pi, ← mk_sigma,
mk_toNat_eq_card, Fintype.card_sigma]
variable {R}
variable [Fintype η]
theorem rank_fun {M η : Type u} [Fintype η] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] :
Module.rank R (η → M) = Fintype.card η * Module.rank R M := by
rw [rank_pi, Cardinal.sum_const', Cardinal.mk_fintype]
theorem rank_fun_eq_lift_mul : Module.rank R (η → M) =
(Fintype.card η : Cardinal.{max u₁' v}) * Cardinal.lift.{u₁'} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_pi, Cardinal.sum_const, Cardinal.mk_fintype, Cardinal.lift_natCast]
theorem rank_fun' : Module.rank R (η → R) = Fintype.card η := by
rw [rank_fun_eq_lift_mul, rank_self, Cardinal.lift_one, mul_one]
theorem rank_fin_fun (n : ℕ) : Module.rank R (Fin n → R) = n := by simp [rank_fun']
variable (R)
/-- The vector space of functions on a `Fintype ι` has finrank equal to the cardinality of `ι`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_fintype_fun_eq_card : finrank R (η → R) = Fintype.card η :=
finrank_eq_of_rank_eq rank_fun'
/-- The vector space of functions on `Fin n` has finrank equal to `n`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_fin_fun {n : ℕ} : finrank R (Fin n → R) = n := by simp
variable {R}
-- TODO: merge with the `Finrank` content
/-- An `n`-dimensional `R`-vector space is equivalent to `Fin n → R`. -/
def finDimVectorspaceEquiv (n : ℕ) (hn : Module.rank R M = n) : M ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
have : Cardinal.lift.{u} (n : Cardinal.{v}) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (n : Cardinal.{u}) := by simp
have hn := Cardinal.lift_inj.{v, u}.2 hn
rw [this] at hn
rw [← @rank_fin_fun R _ _ n] at hn
haveI : Module.Free R (Fin n → R) := Module.Free.pi _ _
exact Classical.choice (nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq hn)
end Pi
section TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [StrongRankCondition S]
variable [Module S M] [Module S M'] [Module.Free S M']
variable [Module S M₁] [Module.Free S M₁]
variable [Algebra S R] [IsScalarTower S R M] [Module.Free R M]
open Module.Free
/-- The `S`-rank of `M ⊗[R] M'` is `(Module.rank S M).lift * (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_tensorProduct :
Module.rank R (M ⊗[S] M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) * Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank S M') := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bM⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
| obtain ⟨⟨_, bN⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := S) (M := M')
rw [← bM.mk_eq_rank'', ← bN.mk_eq_rank'', ← (bM.tensorProduct bN).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_prod]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 370 | 371 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ImageToKernel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Exact sequences in abelian categories
In an abelian category, we get several interesting results related to exactness which are not
true in more general settings.
## Main results
* A short complex `S` is exact iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
* If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` has the universal property of the kernel of `g`.
* `f` is a monomorphism iff `kernel.ι f = 0` iff `Exact 0 f`, and `f` is an epimorphism iff
`cokernel.π = 0` iff `Exact f 0`.
* A faithful functor between abelian categories that preserves zero morphisms reflects exact
sequences.
* `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ 0` is exact if and only if the second map is a cokernel of the first, and
`0 ⟶ X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z` is exact if and only if the first map is a kernel of the second.
* A functor `F` such that for all `S`, we have `S.Exact → (S.map F).Exact` preserves both
finite limits and colimits.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace ShortComplex
variable (S : ShortComplex C)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel' : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift]
have : factorThruImage S.f ≫ imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero = kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (kernel.ι _), kernel.lift_ι, imageToKernel',
Category.assoc, image.fac]
constructor
· intro
exact epi_of_epi_fac this
· intro
rw [← this]
apply epi_comp
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel']
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (imageSubobjectIso S.f).symm (kernelSubobjectIso S.g).symm
theorem exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ IsIso (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
apply isIso_of_mono_of_epi
· intro
infer_instance
/-- In an abelian category, a short complex `S` is exact
iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
-/
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : S.Exact ↔ imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g := by
rw [exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
exact Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ S.zero)) (by simp)
· intro h
exact ⟨Subobject.ofLE _ _ h.ge, by ext; simp, by ext; simp⟩
theorem exact_iff_of_forks {cg : KernelFork S.g} (hg : IsLimit cg) {cf : CokernelCofork S.f}
(hf : IsColimit cf) : S.Exact ↔ cg.ι ≫ cf.π = 0 := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero]
let e₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg
let e₂ := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf
have : cg.ι ≫ cf.π = e₁.inv ≫ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f ≫ e₂.hom := by
have eq₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg (.zero)
have eq₂ := IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf (.one)
dsimp at eq₁ eq₂
rw [← eq₁, ← eq₂, Category.assoc]
rw [this, IsIso.comp_left_eq_zero e₁.inv, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero _ e₂.hom]
variable {S}
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.image.ι S.f` is a kernel of `S.g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Abelian.image.ι S.f)
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
exact KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun u hu ↦ kernel.lift (cokernel.π S.f) u
(by rw [← kernel.lift_ι S.g u hu, Category.assoc, h, comp_zero])) (by simp)
(fun _ _ _ hm => by rw [← cancel_mono (Abelian.image.ι S.f), hm, kernel.lift_ι])
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` is a kernel of `g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage' (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Limits.image.ι S.f)
(image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _ h.isLimitImage (Abelian.imageIsoImage S.f).symm <| IsImage.lift_fac _ _
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.coimage.π g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitCoimage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit
(CokernelCofork.ofπ (Abelian.coimage.π S.g) (Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero) :
CokernelCofork S.f) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
refine CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun u hu => cokernel.desc (kernel.ι S.g) u
(by rw [← cokernel.π_desc S.f u hu, ← Category.assoc, h, zero_comp]))
(by simp) ?_
intros _ _ _ _ hm
ext
rw [hm, cokernel.π_desc]
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `factorThruImage g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.factorThruImage S.g)
(comp_factorThruImage_eq_zero S.zero)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _ h.isColimitCoimage (Abelian.coimageIsoImage' S.g) <|
(cancel_mono (Limits.image.ι S.g)).1 <| by simp
theorem exact_kernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk (kernel.ι f) f (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ (kernelIsKernel f)
theorem exact_cokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk f (cokernel.π f) (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f)
variable (S)
theorem exact_iff_exact_image_ι :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk (Abelian.image.ι S.f) S.g
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := Abelian.factorThruImage S.f
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
theorem exact_iff_exact_coimage_π :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk S.f (Abelian.coimage.π S.g)
(Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact := by
symm
exact ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := Abelian.factorThruCoimage S.g }
end ShortComplex
section
|
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Mono f, kernel.ι f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk (0 : Z ⟶ X) f zero_comp).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := mono_of_kernel_ι_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 168 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Pointwise.Stabilizer
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-! # Blocks
Given `SMul G X`, an action of a type `G` on a type `X`, we define
- the predicate `MulAction.IsBlock G B` states that `B : Set X` is a block,
which means that the sets `g • B`, for `g ∈ G`, are equal or disjoint.
Under `Group G` and `MulAction G X`, this is equivalent to the classical
definition `MulAction.IsBlock.def_one`
- a bunch of lemmas that give examples of “trivial” blocks : ⊥, ⊤, singletons,
and non trivial blocks: orbit of the group, orbit of a normal subgroup…
The non-existence of nontrivial blocks is the definition of primitive actions.
## Results for actions on finite sets
- `MulAction.IsBlock.ncard_block_mul_ncard_orbit_eq` : The cardinality of a block
multiplied by the number of its translates is the cardinal of the ambient type
- `MulAction.IsBlock.eq_univ_of_card_lt` : a too large block is equal to `Set.univ`
- `MulAction.IsBlock.subsingleton_of_card_lt` : a too small block is a subsingleton
- `MulAction.IsBlock.of_subset` : the intersections of the translates of a finite subset
that contain a given point is a block
- `MulAction.BlockMem` : the type of blocks containing a given element
- `MulAction.BlockMem.instBoundedOrder` :
the type of blocks containing a given element is a bounded order.
## References
We follow [Wielandt-1964].
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
section orbits
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.eq_or_disjoint (a b : X) :
orbit G a = orbit G b ∨ Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b) := by
apply (em (Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b))).symm.imp _ id
simp +contextual
only [Set.not_disjoint_iff, ← orbit_eq_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp, eq_comm, implies_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.pairwiseDisjoint :
(Set.range fun x : X => orbit G x).PairwiseDisjoint id := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩ t ⟨y, rfl⟩ h
contrapose! h
exact (orbit.eq_or_disjoint x y).resolve_right h
/-- Orbits of an element form a partition -/
@[to_additive "Orbits of an element form a partition"]
theorem IsPartition.of_orbits :
Setoid.IsPartition (Set.range fun a : X => orbit G a) := by
apply orbit.pairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty
· intro x
exact ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_orbit_self x⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha : orbit G a = ∅⟩
exact (MulAction.orbit_nonempty a).ne_empty ha
end orbits
section SMul
variable (G : Type*) {X : Type*} [SMul G X] {B : Set X} {a : X}
-- Change terminology to IsFullyInvariant?
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g • B = B` for all `g : G`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g +ᵥ B = B` for all `g : G`."]
def IsFixedBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B = B
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g • B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
"A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g +ᵥ B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. "]
def IsInvariantBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B ⊆ B
section IsTrivialBlock
/-- A trivial block is a `Set X` which is either a subsingleton or `univ`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
"A trivial block is a `Set X` which is either a subsingleton or `univ`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group."]
def IsTrivialBlock (B : Set X) := B.Subsingleton ∨ B = univ
variable {M α N β : Type*}
section monoid
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.image {φ : M → N} {f : α →ₑ[φ] β}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) {B : Set α} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) :
IsTrivialBlock (f '' B) := by
obtain hB | hB := hB
· apply Or.intro_left; apply Set.Subsingleton.image hB
· apply Or.intro_right; rw [hB]
simp only [Set.top_eq_univ, Set.image_univ, Set.range_eq_univ, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.preimage {φ : M → N} {f : α →ₑ[φ] β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {B : Set β} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) :
IsTrivialBlock (f ⁻¹' B) := by
obtain hB | hB := hB
· apply Or.intro_left; exact Set.Subsingleton.preimage hB hf
· apply Or.intro_right; simp only [hB, Set.top_eq_univ]; apply Set.preimage_univ
end monoid
variable [Group M] [MulAction M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.smul {B : Set α} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) (g : M) :
IsTrivialBlock (g • B) := by
cases hB with
| inl h =>
left
exact (Function.Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (MulAction.injective g)).mpr h
| inr h =>
right
rw [h, ← Set.image_smul, Set.image_univ_of_surjective (MulAction.surjective g)]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.smul_iff {B : Set α} (g : M) :
IsTrivialBlock (g • B) ↔ IsTrivialBlock B := by
constructor
· intro H
convert IsTrivialBlock.smul H g⁻¹
simp only [inv_smul_smul]
· intro H
exact IsTrivialBlock.smul H g
end IsTrivialBlock
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-block iff the sets of the form `g • B` are pairwise equal or disjoint. -/
@[to_additive
"A set `B` is a `G`-block iff the sets of the form `g +ᵥ B` are pairwise equal or disjoint. "]
def IsBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ ⦃g₁ g₂ : G⦄, g₁ • B ≠ g₂ • B → Disjoint (g₁ • B) (g₂ • B)
variable {G} {s : Set G} {g g₁ g₂ : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_smul_eq_smul_of_nonempty :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ ⦃g₁ g₂ : G⦄, (g₁ • B ∩ g₂ • B).Nonempty → g₁ • B = g₂ • B := by
simp_rw [IsBlock, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_pairwiseDisjoint_range_smul :
IsBlock G B ↔ (range fun g : G ↦ g • B).PairwiseDisjoint id := pairwiseDisjoint_range_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_smul_eq_smul_or_disjoint :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ g₁ g₂ : G, g₁ • B = g₂ • B ∨ Disjoint (g₁ • B) (g₂ • B) :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ or_iff_not_imp_left.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.smul_eq_smul_of_subset (hB : IsBlock G B) (hg : g₁ • B ⊆ g₂ • B) :
g₁ • B = g₂ • B := by
by_contra! hg'
obtain rfl : B = ∅ := by simpa using (hB hg').eq_bot_of_le hg
simp at hg'
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.not_smul_set_ssubset_smul_set (hB : IsBlock G B) : ¬ g₁ • B ⊂ g₂ • B :=
fun hab ↦ hab.ne <| hB.smul_eq_smul_of_subset hab.subset
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.disjoint_smul_set_smul (hB : IsBlock G B) (hgs : ¬ g • B ⊆ s • B) :
Disjoint (g • B) (s • B) := by
rw [← iUnion_smul_set, disjoint_iUnion₂_right]
exact fun b hb ↦ hB fun h ↦ hgs <| h.trans_subset <| smul_set_subset_smul hb
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.disjoint_smul_smul_set (hB : IsBlock G B) (hgs : ¬ g • B ⊆ s • B) :
Disjoint (s • B) (g • B) := (hB.disjoint_smul_set_smul hgs).symm
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨IsBlock.smul_eq_smul_of_nonempty, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_smul_eq_smul_of_nonempty
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨IsBlock.pairwiseDisjoint_range_smul, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_pairwiseDisjoint_range_smul
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨IsBlock.smul_eq_smul_or_disjoint, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_smul_eq_smul_or_disjoint
/-- A fixed block is a block. -/
@[to_additive "A fixed block is a block."]
lemma IsFixedBlock.isBlock (hfB : IsFixedBlock G B) : IsBlock G B := by simp [IsBlock, hfB _]
/-- The empty set is a block. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The empty set is a block."]
lemma IsBlock.empty : IsBlock G (∅ : Set X) := by simp [IsBlock]
/-- A singleton is a block. -/
@[to_additive "A singleton is a block."]
lemma IsBlock.singleton : IsBlock G ({a} : Set X) := by simp [IsBlock]
/-- Subsingletons are (trivial) blocks. -/
@[to_additive "Subsingletons are (trivial) blocks."]
lemma IsBlock.of_subsingleton (hB : B.Subsingleton) : IsBlock G B :=
hB.induction_on .empty fun _ ↦ .singleton
/-- A fixed block is an invariant block. -/
@[to_additive "A fixed block is an invariant block."]
lemma IsFixedBlock.isInvariantBlock (hB : IsFixedBlock G B) : IsInvariantBlock G B :=
fun _ ↦ (hB _).le
end SMul
section Monoid
variable {M X : Type*} [Monoid M] [MulAction M X] {B : Set X} {s : Set M}
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.disjoint_smul_right (hB : IsBlock M B) (hs : ¬ B ⊆ s • B) : Disjoint B (s • B) := by
simpa using hB.disjoint_smul_set_smul (g := 1) (by simpa using hs)
@[to_additive]
lemma IsBlock.disjoint_smul_left (hB : IsBlock M B) (hs : ¬ B ⊆ s • B) : Disjoint (s • B) B :=
(hB.disjoint_smul_right hs).symm
end Monoid
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {X : Type*} [MulAction G X] {B : Set X}
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_disjoint_smul_of_ne :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ ⦃g : G⦄, g • B ≠ B → Disjoint (g • B) B := by
refine ⟨fun hB g ↦ by simpa using hB (g₂ := 1), fun hB g₁ g₂ h ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [disjoint_smul_set_right, ne_eq, ← inv_smul_eq_iff, smul_smul] at h ⊢
exact hB h
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_smul_eq_of_nonempty :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ ⦃g : G⦄, (g • B ∩ B).Nonempty → g • B = B := by
simp_rw [isBlock_iff_disjoint_smul_of_ne, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_smul_eq_or_disjoint :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ g : G, g • B = B ∨ Disjoint (g • B) B :=
isBlock_iff_disjoint_smul_of_ne.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ or_iff_not_imp_left.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma isBlock_iff_smul_eq_of_mem :
IsBlock G B ↔ ∀ ⦃g : G⦄ ⦃a : X⦄, a ∈ B → g • a ∈ B → g • B = B := by
simp [isBlock_iff_smul_eq_of_nonempty, Set.Nonempty, mem_smul_set]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsBlock.disjoint_smul_of_ne, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_disjoint_smul_of_ne
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsBlock.smul_eq_of_nonempty, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_smul_eq_of_nonempty
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsBlock.smul_eq_or_disjoint, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_smul_eq_or_disjoint
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsBlock.smul_eq_of_mem, _⟩ := isBlock_iff_smul_eq_of_mem
|
-- TODO: Generalise to `SubgroupClass`
/-- If `B` is a `G`-block, then it is also a `H`-block for any subgroup `H` of `G`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `B` is a `G`-block, then it is also a `H`-block for any subgroup `H` of `G`."]
lemma IsBlock.subgroup {H : Subgroup G} (hB : IsBlock G B) : IsBlock H B := fun _ _ h ↦ hB h
/-- A block of a group action is invariant iff it is fixed. -/
@[to_additive "A block of a group action is invariant iff it is fixed."]
lemma isInvariantBlock_iff_isFixedBlock : IsInvariantBlock G B ↔ IsFixedBlock G B :=
⟨fun hB g ↦ (hB g).antisymm <| subset_smul_set_iff.2 <| hB _, IsFixedBlock.isInvariantBlock⟩
/-- An invariant block of a group action is a fixed block. -/
@[to_additive "An invariant block of a group action is a fixed block."]
alias ⟨IsInvariantBlock.isFixedBlock, _⟩ := isInvariantBlock_iff_isFixedBlock
/-- An invariant block of a group action is a block. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Blocks.lean | 280 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
/-!
# Prime powers
This file deals with prime powers: numbers which are positive integer powers of a single prime.
-/
assert_not_exists Nat.divisors
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (n p : R) (k : ℕ)
/-- `n` is a prime power if there is a prime `p` and a positive natural `k` such that `n` can be
written as `p^k`. -/
def IsPrimePow : Prop :=
∃ (p : R) (k : ℕ), Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n
theorem isPrimePow_def : IsPrimePow n ↔ ∃ (p : R) (k : ℕ), Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An equivalent definition for prime powers: `n` is a prime power iff there is a prime `p` and a
natural `k` such that `n` can be written as `p^(k+1)`. -/
theorem isPrimePow_iff_pow_succ : IsPrimePow n ↔ ∃ (p : R) (k : ℕ), Prime p ∧ p ^ (k + 1) = n :=
(isPrimePow_def _).trans
⟨fun ⟨p, k, hp, hk, hn⟩ => ⟨p, k - 1, hp, by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel hk]⟩, fun ⟨_, _, hp, hn⟩ =>
⟨_, _, hp, Nat.succ_pos', hn⟩⟩
theorem not_isPrimePow_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] : ¬IsPrimePow (0 : R) := by
simp only [isPrimePow_def, not_exists, not_and', and_imp]
intro x n _hn hx
rw [pow_eq_zero hx]
simp
theorem IsPrimePow.not_unit {n : R} (h : IsPrimePow n) : ¬IsUnit n :=
let ⟨_p, _k, hp, hk, hn⟩ := h
hn ▸ (isUnit_pow_iff hk.ne').not.mpr hp.not_unit
theorem IsUnit.not_isPrimePow {n : R} (h : IsUnit n) : ¬IsPrimePow n := fun h' => h'.not_unit h
theorem not_isPrimePow_one : ¬IsPrimePow (1 : R) :=
isUnit_one.not_isPrimePow
theorem Prime.isPrimePow {p : R} (hp : Prime p) : IsPrimePow p :=
⟨p, 1, hp, zero_lt_one, by simp⟩
theorem IsPrimePow.pow {n : R} (hn : IsPrimePow n) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : IsPrimePow (n ^ k) :=
let ⟨p, k', hp, hk', hn⟩ := hn
⟨p, k * k', hp, mul_pos hk.bot_lt hk', by rw [pow_mul', hn]⟩
theorem IsPrimePow.ne_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : R} (h : IsPrimePow n) : n ≠ 0 := fun t =>
| not_isPrimePow_zero (t ▸ h)
| Mathlib/Algebra/IsPrimePow.lean | 57 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
theorem self_subset_gauge_le_one : s ⊆ { x | gauge s x ≤ 1 } := fun _ => gauge_le_one_of_mem
theorem Convex.gauge_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
Convex ℝ { x | gauge s x ≤ a } := by
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a
· rw [gauge_le_eq hs h₀ absorbs ha]
exact convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter fun _ => hs.smul _
· convert convex_empty (𝕜 := ℝ)
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ha <| (gauge_nonneg _).trans hx
theorem Balanced.starConvex (hs : Balanced ℝ s) : StarConvex ℝ 0 s :=
starConvex_zero_iff.2 fun _ hx a ha₀ ha₁ =>
hs _ (by rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg ha₀]) (smul_mem_smul_set hx)
theorem le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₀ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ a • s) :
a ≤ gauge s x := by
rw [starConvex_zero_iff] at hs₀
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := hs₂.exists_pos
refine le_csInf ⟨r, hr, singleton_subset_iff.1 <| h _ (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le).ge⟩ ?_
rintro b ⟨hb, x, hx', rfl⟩
refine not_lt.1 fun hba => hx ?_
have ha := hb.trans hba
refine ⟨(a⁻¹ * b) • x, hs₀ hx' (by positivity) ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ hba.le ha.le
· dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ ha.ne']
theorem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₁ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ s) :
1 ≤ gauge s x :=
le_gauge_of_not_mem hs₁ hs₂ <| by rwa [one_smul]
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
[MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ]
theorem gauge_smul_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [IsScalarTower α ℝ (Set E)] {s : Set E} {a : α}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (x : E) : gauge s (a • x) = a • gauge s x := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul, gauge_zero, zero_smul]
rw [gauge_def', gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr
refine ⟨a⁻¹ • r, ⟨this, ?_⟩, smul_inv_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc,
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (inv_ne_zero ha'.ne'), inv_inv]
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos ha' hr
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc]
exact smul_mem_smul_set hx
theorem gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
gauge (a • s) = a⁻¹ • gauge s := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [inv_zero, zero_smul, gauge_of_subset_zero (zero_smul_set_subset _)]
ext x
rw [gauge_def', Pi.smul_apply, gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 ha)]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, y, hy, h⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨a • r, ⟨smul_pos ha' hr, ?_⟩, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, ← h, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne']
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr, r⁻¹ • x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, inv_inv]
theorem gauge_smul_left [Module α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (a : α) :
gauge (a • s) = |a|⁻¹ • gauge s := by
rw [← gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg a)]
obtain h | h := abs_choice a
· rw [h]
· rw [h, Set.neg_smul_set, ← Set.smul_set_neg]
-- Porting note: was congr
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
ext y
refine ⟨symmetric _, fun hy => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_neg y]
exact symmetric _ hy
end LinearOrderedField
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem gauge_norm_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) :
gauge s (‖r‖ • x) = gauge s (r • x) := by
unfold gauge
congr with θ
rw [@RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul 𝕜]
refine and_congr_right fun hθ => (hs.smul _).smul_mem_iff ?_
rw [RCLike.norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
/-- If `s` is balanced, then the Minkowski functional is ℂ-homogeneous. -/
theorem gauge_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) : gauge s (r • x) = ‖r‖ * gauge s x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← gauge_smul_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg r), gauge_norm_smul hs]
end RCLike
open Filter
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le (ha : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) ≤ 𝓝 0 := fun u hu ↦ by
rcases (hb hu).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap (gt_mem_nhds (inv_pos.2 hr₀))] with x (hx : gauge s x < r⁻¹)
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt ha hx with ⟨c, hc₀, hcr, y, hy, rfl⟩
have hrc := (lt_inv_comm₀ hr₀ hc₀).2 hcr
rcases hr c⁻¹ (hrc.le.trans (le_abs_self _)) hy with ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
simpa only [smul_inv_smul₀ hc₀.ne']
variable [T1Space E]
theorem gauge_eq_zero (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
gauge s x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h₀ ↦ by_contra fun (hne : x ≠ 0) ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ gauge_zero⟩
have : {x}ᶜ ∈ comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) :=
comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le hs hb (isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hne.symm)
rcases ((nhds_basis_zero_abs_lt _).comap _).mem_iff.1 this with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
exact hr (by simpa [h₀]) rfl
theorem gauge_pos (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
0 < gauge s x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp only [(gauge_nonneg _).gt_iff_ne, Ne, gauge_eq_zero hs hb]
end TopologicalSpace
section ContinuousSMul
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E]
open Filter in
theorem interior_subset_gauge_lt_one (s : Set E) : interior s ⊆ { x | gauge s x < 1 } := by
intro x hx
have H₁ : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ ↦ r⁻¹ • x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ)⁻¹ • x)) :=
((tendsto_id.inv₀ one_ne_zero).smul tendsto_const_nhds).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [inv_one, one_smul] at H₁
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[<] (1 : ℝ), x ∈ r • s ∧ 0 < r ∧ r < 1 := by
filter_upwards [H₁ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hx), Ioo_mem_nhdsLT one_pos] with r h₁ h₂
exact ⟨(mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ h₂.1.ne' _ _).2 h₁, h₂⟩
rcases H₂.exists with ⟨r, hxr, hr₀, hr₁⟩
exact (gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hxr).trans_lt hr₁
theorem gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_isOpen (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } = s := by
refine (gauge_lt_one_subset_self hs₁ ‹_› <| absorbent_nhds_zero <| hs₂.mem_nhds hs₀).antisymm ?_
convert interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s
exact hs₂.interior_eq.symm
theorem gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen (hs₂ : IsOpen s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) :
gauge s x < 1 :=
interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s <| by rwa [hs₂.interior_eq]
theorem gauge_lt_of_mem_smul (x : E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ ε • s) :
gauge s x < ε := by
have : ε⁻¹ • x ∈ s := by rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hε.ne']
have h_gauge_lt := gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen hs₂ this
rwa [gauge_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hε.le), smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_lt_iff₀ hε, mul_one]
at h_gauge_lt
theorem mem_closure_of_gauge_le_one (hc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : 0 ∈ s) (ha : Absorbent ℝ s)
(h : gauge s x ≤ 1) : x ∈ closure s := by
have : ∀ᶠ r : ℝ in 𝓝[<] 1, r • x ∈ s := by
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsLT one_pos] with r ⟨hr₀, hr₁⟩
apply gauge_lt_one_subset_self hc hs₀ ha
| rw [mem_setOf_eq, gauge_smul_of_nonneg hr₀]
exact mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left hr₀ hr₁ h
refine mem_closure_of_tendsto ?_ this
exact Filter.Tendsto.mono_left (Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (one_smul _ _))
inf_le_left
theorem mem_frontier_of_gauge_eq_one (hc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : 0 ∈ s) (ha : Absorbent ℝ s)
(h : gauge s x = 1) : x ∈ frontier s :=
⟨mem_closure_of_gauge_le_one hc hs₀ ha h.le, fun h' ↦
(interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s h').out.ne h⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 377 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
/-!
# Congruences modulo a natural number
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [MOD n]` on the natural numbers,
and proves basic properties about it such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem
`modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul`.
## Notations
`a ≡ b [MOD n]` is notation for `nat.ModEq n a b`, which is defined to mean `a % n = b % n`.
## Tags
ModEq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Function.support
namespace Nat
/-- Modular equality. `n.ModEq a b`, or `a ≡ b [MOD n]`, means that `a - b` is a multiple of `n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℕ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [MOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℕ}
-- Since `ModEq` is semi-reducible, we need to provide the decidable instance manually
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (a % n = b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl]
protected theorem refl (a : ℕ) : a ≡ a [MOD n] := rfl
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [MOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ c [MOD n] → a ≡ c [MOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : Trans (ModEq n) (ModEq n) (ModEq n) where
trans := Nat.ModEq.trans
protected theorem comm : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
end ModEq
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by rw [ModEq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_nat (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_nat (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [MOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_nat.symm
theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (n : ℤ) ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mod,
Int.emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero, Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
alias ⟨ModEq.dvd, modEq_of_dvd⟩ := modEq_iff_dvd
/-- A variant of `modEq_iff_dvd` with `Nat` divisibility -/
theorem modEq_iff_dvd' (h : a ≤ b) : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.ofNat_sub h]
theorem mod_modEq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [MOD n] :=
mod_mod _ _
namespace ModEq
lemma of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
modEq_of_dvd <| Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr d |>.trans h.dvd
protected theorem mul_left' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * n] := by
unfold ModEq at *; rw [mul_mod_mul_left, mul_mod_mul_left, h]
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD n] :=
(h.mul_left' _).of_dvd (dvd_mul_left _ _)
protected theorem mul_right' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n * c] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left' c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact h.mul_left c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD n] :=
(h₂.mul_left _).trans (h₁.mul_right _)
@[gcongr]
protected theorem pow (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ^ m ≡ b ^ m [MOD n] := by
induction m with
| zero => rfl
| succ d hd =>
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ]
exact hd.mul h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_add, add_sub_add_comm]
exact Int.dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n] :=
h.add ModEq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
c ≡ d [MOD n] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add] at *
rw [add_sub_add_comm] at h₂
convert Int.dvd_sub h₂ h₁ using 1
rw [add_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂
exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
/-- Cancel left multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_left`. -/
protected theorem mul_left_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.mul_sub]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_left_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_left_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_left' _⟩
/-- Cancel right multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_right`. -/
protected theorem mul_right_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.sub_mul]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_right_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_right_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_right' _⟩
/-- Cancel left multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_left_cancel'`. -/
lemma of_mul_left (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd] at *
exact (dvd_mul_left (n : ℤ) (m : ℤ)).trans h
/-- Cancel right multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_right_cancel'`. -/
| lemma of_mul_right (m : ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD n * m] → a ≡ b [MOD n] := mul_comm m n ▸ of_mul_left _
theorem of_div (h : a / c ≡ b / c [MOD m / c]) (ha : c ∣ a) (ha : c ∣ b) (ha : c ∣ m) :
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ModEq.lean | 186 | 188 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
/-!
# Properties about the powers of the norm
In this file we prove that `x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p` is continuously differentiable for
an inner product space and for a real number `p > 1`.
## TODO
* `x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p` should be `C^n` for `p > n`.
-/
section ContDiffNormPow
open Asymptotics Real Topology
open scoped NNReal
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
theorem hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow (x : E) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) ((p * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 2)) • innerSL ℝ x) x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, norm_zero, map_zero, smul_zero]
have h2p : 0 < p - 1 := sub_pos.mpr hp
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO]
calc (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p - ‖(0 : E)‖ ^ p - 0)
= (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) := by simp [zero_lt_one.trans hp |>.ne']
_ = (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 1)) := by
ext x
rw [← rpow_one_add' (norm_nonneg x) (by positivity)]
ring_nf
_ =o[𝓝 0] (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ * 1) := by
refine (isBigO_refl _ _).mul_isLittleO <| (isLittleO_const_iff <| by norm_num).mpr ?_
convert continuousAt_id.norm.rpow_const (.inr h2p.le) |>.tendsto
simp [h2p.ne']
_ =O[𝓝 0] (fun (x : E) ↦ x - 0) := by
simp_rw [mul_one, isBigO_norm_left (f' := fun x ↦ x), sub_zero, isBigO_refl]
· apply HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq x).rpow_const (p := p / 2) (by simp [hx]) using 0
simp_rw [← Real.rpow_natCast_mul (norm_nonneg _), ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℝ, smul_smul]
ring_nf
theorem differentiable_norm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) :=
fun x ↦ hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow x hp |>.differentiableAt
theorem hasDerivAt_norm_rpow (x : ℝ) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) (p * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 2) * x) x := by
convert hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow x hp |>.hasDerivAt using 1; simp
theorem hasDerivAt_abs_rpow (x : ℝ) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ ↦ |x| ^ p) (p * |x| ^ (p - 2) * x) x := by
simpa using hasDerivAt_norm_rpow x hp
theorem fderiv_norm_rpow (x : E) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) x = (p * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 2)) • innerSL ℝ x :=
hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow x hp |>.fderiv
theorem Differentiable.fderiv_norm_rpow {f : F → E} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
{x : F} {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ ^ p) x =
(p * ‖f x‖ ^ (p - 2)) • (innerSL ℝ (f x)).comp (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow (f x) hp |>.comp x (hf x).hasFDerivAt |>.fderiv
theorem norm_fderiv_norm_rpow_le {f : F → E} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) {x : F}
{p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ ^ p) x‖ ≤ p * ‖f x‖ ^ (p - 1) * ‖fderiv ℝ f x‖ := by
rw [hf.fderiv_norm_rpow hp, norm_smul, norm_mul]
simp_rw [norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm, norm_eq_abs,
abs_eq_self.mpr <| zero_le_one.trans hp.le, mul_assoc]
gcongr _ * ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_comp_le ..) (by positivity)
|>.trans_eq ?_
rw [innerSL_apply_norm, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add_one' (by positivity) (by linarith)]
ring_nf
theorem norm_fderiv_norm_id_rpow (x : E) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) x‖ = p * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 1) := by
rw [fderiv_norm_rpow x hp, norm_smul, norm_mul]
simp_rw [norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm, norm_eq_abs,
abs_eq_self.mpr <| zero_le_one.trans hp.le, mul_assoc, innerSL_apply_norm]
rw [← Real.rpow_add_one' (by positivity) (by linarith)]
ring_nf
theorem nnnorm_fderiv_norm_rpow_le {f : F → E} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
{x : F} {p : ℝ≥0} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ ^ (p : ℝ)) x‖₊ ≤ p * ‖f x‖₊ ^ ((p : ℝ) - 1) * ‖fderiv ℝ f x‖₊ :=
norm_fderiv_norm_rpow_le hf hp
lemma enorm_fderiv_norm_rpow_le {f : F → E} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
{x : F} {p : ℝ≥0} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖fderiv ℝ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ ^ (p : ℝ)) x‖ₑ ≤ p * ‖f x‖ₑ ^ ((p : ℝ) - 1) * ‖fderiv ℝ f x‖ₑ := by
| simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (sub_nonneg.2 <| NNReal.one_le_coe.2 hp.le),
← ENNReal.coe_mul] using nnnorm_fderiv_norm_rpow_le hf hp
theorem contDiff_norm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) : ContDiff ℝ 1 (fun x : E ↦ ‖x‖ ^ p) := by
rw [contDiff_one_iff_fderiv]
refine ⟨fun x ↦ hasFDerivAt_norm_rpow x hp |>.differentiableAt, ?_⟩
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp_rw [hx, ContinuousAt, fderiv_norm_rpow (0 : E) hp, norm_zero, map_zero, smul_zero]
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le (tendsto_const_nhds) ?_
(fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun _ ↦ norm_fderiv_norm_id_rpow _ hp |>.le)
suffices ContinuousAt (fun x : E ↦ p * ‖x‖ ^ (p - 1)) 0 by
simpa [ContinuousAt, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hp.ne'] using this
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/NormPow.lean | 101 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Left Homology of short complexes
Given a short complex `S : ShortComplex C`, which consists of two composable
maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`, we shall define
here the "left homology" `S.leftHomology` of `S`. For this, we introduce the
notion of "left homology data". Such an `h : S.LeftHomologyData` consists of the
data of morphisms `i : K ⟶ X₂` and `π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies
`K` with the kernel of `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃`, and that `π` identifies `H` with the cokernel
of the induced map `f' : X₁ ⟶ K`.
When such a `S.LeftHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasLeftHomology]`
and we define `S.leftHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen left homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.cycles` to be the `K` field.
The dual notion is defined in `RightHomologyData.lean`. In `Homology.lean`,
when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data (i.e. they give
the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define `[S.HasHomology]`
and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` and
`π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies `K` to the kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`,
and that `π` identifies `H` to the cokernel of the induced map `f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
structure LeftHomologyData where
/-- a choice of kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
K : C
/-- a choice of cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
H : C
/-- the inclusion of cycles in `S.X₂` -/
i : K ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the projection from cycles to the (left) homology -/
π : K ⟶ H
/-- the kernel condition for `i` -/
wi : i ≫ S.g = 0
/-- `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` is a kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi)
/-- the cokernel condition for `π` -/
wπ : hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι _ S.zero) ≫ π = 0
/-- `π : K ⟶ H` is a cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ π wπ)
initialize_simps_projections LeftHomologyData (-hi, -hπ)
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- The chosen kernels and cokernels of the limits API give a `LeftHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kernel S.g
H := cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)
i := kernel.ι _
π := cokernel.π _
wi := kernel.condition _
hi := kernelIsKernel _
wπ := cokernel.condition _
hπ := cokernelIsCokernel _
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wi wπ
variable {S}
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Mono h.i := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hi⟩
instance : Epi h.π := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hπ⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` that is a cycle (i.e. `k ≫ S.g = 0`) lifts
to a morphism `A ⟶ K` -/
def liftK (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.K := h.hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftK_i (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : h.liftK k hk ≫ h.i = k :=
h.hi.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.zero
/-- The (left) homology class `A ⟶ H` attached to a cycle `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` -/
@[simp]
def liftH (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.H := h.liftK k hk ≫ h.π
/-- Given `h : LeftHomologyData S`, this is morphism `S.X₁ ⟶ h.K` induced
by `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the fact that `h.K` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K := h.liftK S.f S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_i : h.f' ≫ h.i = S.f := liftK_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_π : h.f' ≫ h.π = 0 := h.wπ
| @[reassoc]
lemma liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
h.liftK k (by rw [hx, assoc, S.zero, comp_zero]) ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = (x ≫ h.f') ≫ h.π by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, hx, liftK_i, assoc, f'_i]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/LeftHomology.lean | 109 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
/-!
# Freiman homomorphisms
In this file, we define Freiman homomorphisms and isomorphism.
An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` such that `f '' A ⊆ B` and
`f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ` for all `x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A` such that
`x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ`. In particular, any `MulHom` is a Freiman homomorphism.
Note a `0`- or `1`-Freiman homomorphism is simply a map, thus a `2`-Freiman homomorphism is the
first interesting case (and the most common). As `n` increases further, the property of being
an `n`-Freiman homomorphism between abelian groups becomes increasingly stronger.
An `n`-Freiman isomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` bijective between `A` and `B`
such that `f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ ↔ x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ` for all
`x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A`. In particular, any `MulEquiv` is a Freiman isomorphism.
They are of interest in additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `IsMulFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsMulFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman isomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman isomorphism.
## Main results
* `isMulFreimanHom_two`: Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms.
* `IsMulFreimanHom.mono`: If `m ≤ n` and `f` is an `n`-Freiman homomorphism, then it is also an
`m`-Freiman homomorphism.
## Implementation notes
In the context of combinatorics, we are interested in Freiman homomorphisms over sets which are not
necessarily closed under addition/multiplication. This means we must parametrize them with a set in
an `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` instead of the `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` itself.
## References
[Yufei Zhao, *18.225: Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics*](https://yufeizhao.com/gtac/)
## TODO
* `MonoidHomClass.isMulFreimanHom` could be relaxed to `MulHom.toFreimanHom` by proving
`(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod` directly by induction instead of going through `f s.prod`.
* Affine maps are Freiman homs.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
open Multiset Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {A A₁ A₂ : Set α}
{B B₁ B₂ : Set β} {C : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {n : ℕ}
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves sums
of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanHom [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.sum = t.sum) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanHom (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.prod = t.prod) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a bijective map which
preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanIso [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum ↔ s.sum = t.sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanIso (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod ↔ s.prod = t.prod
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.isMulFreimanHom (hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f) : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f where
mapsTo := hf.bijOn.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod _s _t hsA htA hs ht := (hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht).2
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₂ where
mapsTo := hf₁.mapsTo.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h' := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (hsA hx)).symm, map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (htA hx)).symm,
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h']
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₂ where
bijOn := hf₁.bijOn.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (hsA hx), map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (htA hx),
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.mul_eq_mul (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 A B f) {a b c d : α}
(ha : a ∈ A) (hb : b ∈ A) (hc : c ∈ A) (hd : d ∈ A) (h : a * b = c * d) :
f a * f b = f c * f d := by
simp_rw [← prod_pair] at h ⊢
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (card_pair _ _) (card_pair _ _) h <;> simp [ha, hb, hc, hd]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.mul_eq_mul (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 A B f) {a b c d : α}
(ha : a ∈ A) (hb : b ∈ A) (hc : c ∈ A) (hd : d ∈ A) :
f a * f b = f c * f d ↔ a * b = c * d := by
simp_rw [← prod_pair]
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (card_pair _ _) (card_pair _ _) <;> simp [ha, hb, hc, hd]
/-- Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_two :
IsMulFreimanHom 2 A B f ↔ MapsTo f A B ∧ ∀ a ∈ A, ∀ b ∈ A, ∀ c ∈ A, ∀ d ∈ A,
a * b = c * d → f a * f b = f c * f d where
mp hf := ⟨hf.mapsTo, fun _ ha _ hb _ hc _ hd ↦ hf.mul_eq_mul ha hb hc hd⟩
mpr hf := ⟨hf.1, by aesop (add simp card_eq_two)⟩
/-- Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homs. -/
@[to_additive "Characterisation of `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma isMulFreimanIso_two :
IsMulFreimanIso 2 A B f ↔ BijOn f A B ∧ ∀ a ∈ A, ∀ b ∈ A, ∀ c ∈ A, ∀ d ∈ A,
f a * f b = f c * f d ↔ a * b = c * d where
mp hf := ⟨hf.bijOn, fun _ ha _ hb _ hc _ hd => hf.mul_eq_mul ha hb hc hd⟩
mpr hf := ⟨hf.1, by aesop (add simp card_eq_two)⟩
@[to_additive] lemma isMulFreimanHom_id (hA : A₁ ⊆ A₂) : IsMulFreimanHom n A₁ A₂ id where
mapsTo := hA
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ h := by simpa using h
@[to_additive] lemma isMulFreimanIso_id : IsMulFreimanIso n A A id where
bijOn := bijOn_id _
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.comp (hg : IsMulFreimanHom n B C g)
(hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f) : IsMulFreimanHom n A C (g ∘ f) where
mapsTo := hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h := by
rw [← map_map, ← map_map]
refine hg.map_prod_eq_map_prod ?_ ?_ (by rwa [card_map]) (by rwa [card_map])
(hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.mapsTo (hsA h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.mapsTo (htA h)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanIso.comp (hg : IsMulFreimanIso n B C g)
(hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f) : IsMulFreimanIso n A C (g ∘ f) where
bijOn := hg.bijOn.comp hf.bijOn
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
rw [← map_map, ← map_map]
rw [hg.map_prod_eq_map_prod _ _ (by rwa [card_map]) (by rwa [card_map]),
hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht]
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.bijOn.mapsTo (hsA h)
· simpa using fun a h ↦ hf.bijOn.mapsTo (htA h)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.subset (hA : A₁ ⊆ A₂) (hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A₂ B₂ f)
(hf' : MapsTo f A₁ B₁) : IsMulFreimanHom n A₁ B₁ f where
mapsTo := hf'
__ := hf.comp (isMulFreimanHom_id hA)
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.superset (hB : B₁ ⊆ B₂) (hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A B₁ f) :
IsMulFreimanHom n A B₂ f := (isMulFreimanHom_id hB).comp hf
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanIso.subset (hA : A₁ ⊆ A₂) (hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A₂ B₂ f)
(hf' : BijOn f A₁ B₁) : IsMulFreimanIso n A₁ B₁ f where
bijOn := hf'
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod (fun a ha ↦ hA (hsA ha)) (fun a ha ↦ hA (htA ha)) hs ht
@[to_additive]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_const {b : β} (hb : b ∈ B) : IsMulFreimanHom n A B fun _ ↦ b where
mapsTo _ _ := hb
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ hs ht _ := by simp only [map_const', hs, prod_replicate, ht]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_zero_iff : IsMulFreimanHom 0 A B f ↔ MapsTo f A B :=
⟨fun h => h.mapsTo, fun h => ⟨h, by aesop⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isMulFreimanIso_zero_iff : IsMulFreimanIso 0 A B f ↔ BijOn f A B :=
⟨fun h => h.bijOn, fun h => ⟨h, by aesop⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp) isAddFreimanHom_one_iff]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_one_iff : IsMulFreimanHom 1 A B f ↔ MapsTo f A B :=
⟨fun h => h.mapsTo, fun h => ⟨h, by aesop (add simp card_eq_one)⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp) isAddFreimanIso_one_iff]
lemma isMulFreimanIso_one_iff : IsMulFreimanIso 1 A B f ↔ BijOn f A B :=
⟨fun h => h.bijOn, fun h => ⟨h, by aesop (add simp [card_eq_one, BijOn])⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isMulFreimanHom_empty : IsMulFreimanHom n (∅ : Set α) B f where
mapsTo := mapsTo_empty f B
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t := by aesop (add simp eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isMulFreimanIso_empty : IsMulFreimanIso n (∅ : Set α) (∅ : Set β) f where
bijOn := bijOn_empty _
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hs ht := by
simp [eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem hs, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem ht]
@[to_additive] lemma IsMulFreimanHom.mul (h₁ : IsMulFreimanHom n A B₁ f₁)
(h₂ : IsMulFreimanHom n A B₂ f₂) : IsMulFreimanHom n A (B₁ * B₂) (f₁ * f₂) where
mapsTo := h₁.mapsTo.mul h₂.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h := by
rw [Pi.mul_def, prod_map_mul, prod_map_mul, h₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h,
h₂.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h]
@[to_additive] lemma MonoidHomClass.isMulFreimanHom [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] (f : F)
(hfAB : MapsTo f A B) : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f where
mapsTo := hfAB
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ h := by rw [← map_multiset_prod, h, map_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive] lemma MulEquivClass.isMulFreimanIso [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β] (f : F)
(hfAB : BijOn f A B) : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f where
bijOn := hfAB
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t _ _ _ _ := by
rw [← map_multiset_prod, ← map_multiset_prod, EquivLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.subtypeVal {S : Type*} [SetLike S α] [SubmonoidClass S α] {s : S} :
IsMulFreimanHom n (univ : Set s) univ Subtype.val :=
MonoidHomClass.isMulFreimanHom (SubmonoidClass.subtype s) (mapsTo_univ ..)
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CancelCommMonoid β] {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.mono (hmn : m ≤ n) (hf : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f) :
IsMulFreimanHom m A B f where
mapsTo := hf.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h := by
obtain rfl | hm := m.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [card_eq_zero] at hs ht
rw [hs, ht]
simp only [← hs, card_pos_iff_exists_mem] at hm
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hm
suffices ((s + replicate (n - m) a).map f).prod = ((t + replicate (n - m) a).map f).prod by
| simp_rw [Multiset.map_add, prod_add] at this
exact mul_right_cancel this
replace ha := hsA ha
refine hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a ha ↦ ?_) ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.mem_add] at ha
obtain ha | ha := ha
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/FreimanHom.lean | 276 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,379 | 1,381 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
/-!
# "Mirror" of a univariate polynomial
In this file we define `Polynomial.mirror`, a variant of `Polynomial.reverse`. The difference
between `reverse` and `mirror` is that `reverse` will decrease the degree if the polynomial is
divisible by `X`.
## Main definitions
- `Polynomial.mirror`
## Main results
- `Polynomial.mirror_mul_of_domain`: `mirror` preserves multiplication.
- `Polynomial.irreducible_of_mirror`: an irreducibility criterion involving `mirror`
-/
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (p q : R[X])
/-- mirror of a polynomial: reverses the coefficients while preserving `Polynomial.natDegree` -/
noncomputable def mirror :=
p.reverse * X ^ p.natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem mirror_zero : (0 : R[X]).mirror = 0 := by simp [mirror]
theorem mirror_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (monomial n a).mirror = monomial n a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, monomial_zero_right, mirror_zero]
· rw [mirror, reverse, natDegree_monomial n a, if_neg ha, natTrailingDegree_monomial ha, ←
C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, revAt_le (le_refl n), tsub_self, pow_zero,
mul_one]
theorem mirror_C (a : R) : (C a).mirror = C a :=
mirror_monomial 0 a
theorem mirror_X : X.mirror = (X : R[X]) :=
mirror_monomial 1 (1 : R)
theorem mirror_natDegree : p.mirror.natDegree = p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, mirror_zero]
nontriviality R
rw [mirror, natDegree_mul', reverse_natDegree, natDegree_X_pow,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le p.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree]
rwa [leadingCoeff_X_pow, mul_one, reverse_leadingCoeff, Ne, trailingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem mirror_natTrailingDegree : p.mirror.natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, mirror_zero]
· rw [mirror, natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow ((mt reverse_eq_zero.mp) hp),
natTrailingDegree_reverse, zero_add]
theorem coeff_mirror (n : ℕ) :
p.mirror.coeff n = p.coeff (revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n) := by
by_cases h2 : p.natDegree < n
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (by rwa [mirror_natDegree])]
by_cases h1 : n ≤ p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree
· rw [revAt_le h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree]
exact (tsub_lt_iff_left h1).mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_right h2 _)
· rw [← revAtFun_eq, revAtFun, if_neg h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt h2]
rw [not_lt] at h2
rw [revAt_le (h2.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
by_cases h3 : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ n
· rw [← tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h2, ← tsub_tsub_assoc h2 h3, mirror, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos h3,
coeff_reverse, revAt_le (tsub_le_self.trans h2)]
rw [not_le] at h3
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_tsub_iff_right.mpr (Nat.add_lt_add_left h3 _))]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree (by rwa [mirror_natTrailingDegree])
--TODO: Extract `Finset.sum_range_rev_at` lemma.
theorem mirror_eval_one : p.mirror.eval 1 = p.eval 1 := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_range, one_pow, mul_one, mirror_natDegree]
refine Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun n _ _ => revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n
· intro n hn hp
rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at *
rw [revAt_le (hn.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right, ← mirror_natTrailingDegree]
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hp
· exact fun n₁ _ _ _ _ _ h => by rw [← @revAt_invol _ n₁, h, revAt_invol]
· intro n hn hp
use revAt (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) n
refine ⟨?_, ?_, revAt_invol⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at *
rw [revAt_le (hn.trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))]
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hp
· change p.mirror.coeff _ ≠ 0
rwa [coeff_mirror, revAt_invol]
· exact fun n _ _ => p.coeff_mirror n
theorem mirror_mirror : p.mirror.mirror = p :=
Polynomial.ext fun n => by
rw [coeff_mirror, coeff_mirror, mirror_natDegree, mirror_natTrailingDegree, revAt_invol]
variable {p q}
theorem mirror_involutive : Function.Involutive (mirror : R[X] → R[X]) :=
mirror_mirror
theorem mirror_eq_iff : p.mirror = q ↔ p = q.mirror :=
mirror_involutive.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem mirror_inj : p.mirror = q.mirror ↔ p = q :=
mirror_involutive.injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem mirror_eq_zero : p.mirror = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← p.mirror_mirror, h, mirror_zero], fun h => by rw [h, mirror_zero]⟩
variable (p q)
@[simp]
theorem mirror_trailingCoeff : p.mirror.trailingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, trailingCoeff, mirror_natTrailingDegree, coeff_mirror,
revAt_le (Nat.le_add_left _ _), add_tsub_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem mirror_leadingCoeff : p.mirror.leadingCoeff = p.trailingCoeff := by
rw [← p.mirror_mirror, mirror_trailingCoeff, p.mirror_mirror]
theorem coeff_mul_mirror :
(p * p.mirror).coeff (p.natDegree + p.natTrailingDegree) = p.sum fun _ => (· ^ 2) := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk]
refine
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun n hn => ?_).trans
(p.sum_eq_of_subset (fun _ ↦ (· ^ 2)) (fun _ ↦ zero_pow two_ne_zero) fun n hn ↦
Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr
((le_natDegree_of_mem_supp n hn).trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _))).symm
rw [coeff_mirror, ← revAt_le (Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hn), revAt_invol, ← sq]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
| theorem natDegree_mul_mirror : (p * p.mirror).natDegree = 2 * p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, zero_mul, natDegree_zero, mul_zero]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Mirror.lean | 151 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.ZMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Cardinal
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Cardinality
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.TranscendenceBasis
/-!
# Classification of Algebraically closed fields
This file contains results related to classifying algebraically closed fields.
## Main statements
* `IsAlgClosed.equivOfTranscendenceBasis` Two algebraically closed fields with the same
characteristic and the same cardinality of transcendence basis are isomorphic.
* `IsAlgClosed.ringEquivOfCardinalEqOfCharEq` Two uncountable algebraically closed fields
are isomorphic if they have the same characteristic and the same cardinality.
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Cardinal Polynomial
open Cardinal
namespace IsAlgClosed
section Classification
noncomputable section
variable {R L K : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Field K] [Algebra R K]
variable [Field L] [Algebra R L]
variable {ι : Type*} (v : ι → K)
variable {κ : Type*} (w : κ → L)
variable (hv : AlgebraicIndependent R v)
theorem isAlgClosure_of_transcendence_basis [IsAlgClosed K] (hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v) :
IsAlgClosure (Algebra.adjoin R (Set.range v)) K :=
letI := RingHom.domain_nontrivial (algebraMap R K)
{ isAlgClosed := by infer_instance
isAlgebraic := hv.isAlgebraic }
variable (hw : AlgebraicIndependent R w)
/-- setting `R` to be `ZMod (ringChar R)` this result shows that if two algebraically
closed fields have equipotent transcendence bases and the same characteristic then they are
isomorphic. -/
def equivOfTranscendenceBasis [IsAlgClosed K] [IsAlgClosed L] (e : ι ≃ κ)
(hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v) (hw : IsTranscendenceBasis R w) : K ≃+* L := by
letI := isAlgClosure_of_transcendence_basis v hv
letI := isAlgClosure_of_transcendence_basis w hw
have e : Algebra.adjoin R (Set.range v) ≃+* Algebra.adjoin R (Set.range w) := by
refine hv.1.aevalEquiv.symm.toRingEquiv.trans ?_
refine (AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.rename e)
(MvPolynomial.rename e.symm) ?_ ?_).toRingEquiv.trans ?_
· ext; simp
· ext; simp
exact hw.1.aevalEquiv.toRingEquiv
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfEquiv K L e
end
end Classification
section Cardinal
variable {R : Type u} {K : Type v} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsAlgClosed K]
variable {ι : Type w} (v : ι → K)
variable {K' : Type u} [Field K'] [Algebra R K'] [IsAlgClosed K']
variable {ι' : Type u} (v' : ι' → K')
/-- The cardinality of an algebraically closed `R`-algebra is less than or equal to
the maximum of of the cardinality of `R`, the cardinality of a transcendence basis and
`ℵ₀`
For a simpler, but less universe-polymorphic statement, see
`IsAlgClosed.cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis'` -/
theorem cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis (hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v) :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #K ≤ max (max (Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #R)
(Cardinal.lift.{max u v} #ι)) ℵ₀ :=
calc
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #K ≤ Cardinal.lift.{max u w}
(max #(Algebra.adjoin R (Set.range v)) ℵ₀) := by
letI := isAlgClosure_of_transcendence_basis v hv
simpa using Algebra.IsAlgebraic.cardinalMk_le_max (Algebra.adjoin R (Set.range v)) K
_ = Cardinal.lift.{v} (max #(MvPolynomial ι R) ℵ₀) := by
rw [lift_max, ← Cardinal.lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨hv.1.aevalEquiv.toEquiv⟩, lift_aleph0,
← lift_aleph0.{max u v w, max u w}, ← lift_max, lift_umax.{max u w, v}]
_ ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (max (max (max (Cardinal.lift #R) (Cardinal.lift #ι)) ℵ₀) ℵ₀) :=
lift_le.2 (max_le_max MvPolynomial.cardinalMk_le_max_lift le_rfl)
_ = _ := by simp
/-- The cardinality of an algebraically closed `R`-algebra is less than or equal to
the maximum of of the cardinality of `R`, the cardinality of a transcendence basis and
`ℵ₀`
A less-universe polymorphic, but simpler statement of
`IsAlgClosed.cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis` -/
theorem cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis' (hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v') :
#K' ≤ max (max #R #ι') ℵ₀ := by
simpa using cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis v' hv
/-- If `K` is an uncountable algebraically closed field, then its
cardinality is the same as that of a transcendence basis.
For a simpler, but less universe-polymorphic statement, see
`IsAlgClosed.cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt'` -/
theorem cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt [Nontrivial R]
(hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v) (hR : #R ≤ ℵ₀) (hK : ℵ₀ < #K) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} #K = Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι :=
have : ℵ₀ ≤ Cardinal.lift.{max u v} #ι := le_of_not_lt fun h => not_le_of_gt
(show ℵ₀ < Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #K by simpa) <|
calc
Cardinal.lift.{max u w, v} #K ≤ max (max (Cardinal.lift.{max v w, u} #R)
(Cardinal.lift.{max u v, w} #ι)) ℵ₀ := cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis v hv
_ ≤ _ := max_le (max_le (by simpa) (by simpa using le_of_lt h)) le_rfl
suffices Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #K = Cardinal.lift.{max u v} #ι
from Cardinal.lift_injective.{u, max v w} (by simpa)
le_antisymm
(calc
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #K ≤ max (max
(Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #R) (Cardinal.lift.{max u v} #ι)) ℵ₀ :=
cardinal_le_max_transcendence_basis v hv
_ = Cardinal.lift #ι := by
rw [max_eq_left, max_eq_right]
· exact le_trans (by simpa using hR) this
· exact le_max_of_le_right this)
(lift_mk_le.2 ⟨⟨v, hv.1.injective⟩⟩)
/-- If `K` is an uncountable algebraically closed field, then its
cardinality is the same as that of a transcendence basis.
This is a simpler, but less general statement of
`cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt`. -/
theorem cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt' [Nontrivial R]
(hv : IsTranscendenceBasis R v') (hR : #R ≤ ℵ₀) (hK : ℵ₀ < #K') : #K' = #ι' := by
simpa using cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt v' hv hR hK
end Cardinal
variable {K : Type u} {L : Type v} [Field K] [Field L] [IsAlgClosed K] [IsAlgClosed L]
/-- Two uncountable algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero are isomorphic
if they have the same cardinality. -/
theorem ringEquiv_of_equiv_of_charZero [CharZero K] [CharZero L] (hK : ℵ₀ < #K)
(hKL : Nonempty (K ≃ L)) : Nonempty (K ≃+* L) := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis ℤ K
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis ℤ L
have hL : ℵ₀ < #L := by
rwa [← aleph0_lt_lift.{v, u}, ← lift_mk_eq'.2 hKL, aleph0_lt_lift]
have : Cardinal.lift.{v} #s = Cardinal.lift.{u} #t := by
rw [← lift_injective (cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt _
hs (le_of_eq mk_int) hK),
← lift_injective (cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt _
ht (le_of_eq mk_int) hL)]
exact Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'.2 hKL
obtain ⟨e⟩ := Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'.1 this
| exact ⟨equivOfTranscendenceBasis _ _ e hs ht⟩
private theorem ringEquiv_of_Cardinal_eq_of_charP (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] [CharP K p] [CharP L p]
(hK : ℵ₀ < #K) (hKL : Nonempty (K ≃ L)) : Nonempty (K ≃+* L) := by
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) K := ZMod.algebra _ _
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) L := ZMod.algebra _ _
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis (ZMod p) K
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis (ZMod p) L
have hL : ℵ₀ < #L := by
rwa [← aleph0_lt_lift.{v, u}, ← lift_mk_eq'.2 hKL, aleph0_lt_lift]
have : Cardinal.lift.{v} #s = Cardinal.lift.{u} #t := by
rw [← lift_injective (cardinal_eq_cardinal_transcendence_basis_of_aleph0_lt _
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsAlgClosed/Classification.lean | 168 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 288 | 289 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Fold
/-!
# Big operators on a multiset in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of multiset big operators with ordered
groups.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → 1 ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl => by simpa using List.one_le_prod_of_one_le hl
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl x hx => by simpa using List.single_le_prod hl x hx
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_le_pow_card (s : Multiset α) (n : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ n) : s.prod ≤ n ^ card s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
| simpa using List.prod_le_pow_card _ _ h
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/Multiset.lean | 39 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,780 | 1,781 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `Finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
- `Finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd_def` and `lcm_def`, which relate `Finset.gcd`
and `Finset.lcm` to `Multiset.gcd` and `Multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `Data.Finset.Lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
| lcm_dvd_iff.2
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 62 | 65 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Continuous
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Dual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfLIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ring
/-! # From equality of integrals to equality of functions
This file provides various statements of the general form "if two functions have the same integral
on all sets, then they are equal almost everywhere".
The different lemmas use various hypotheses on the class of functions, on the target space or on the
possible finiteness of the measure.
This file is about Bochner integrals. See the file `AEEqOfLIntegral` for Lebesgue integrals.
## Main statements
All results listed below apply to two functions `f, g`, together with two main hypotheses,
* `f` and `g` are integrable on all measurable sets with finite measure,
* for all measurable sets `s` with finite measure, `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ`.
The conclusion is then `f =ᵐ[μ] g`. The main lemmas are:
* `ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite`: case of a sigma-finite measure.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for functions which are
`AEFinStronglyMeasurable`.
* `Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for elements of `Lp`, for `0 < p < ∞`.
* `Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for integrable functions.
For each of these results, we also provide a lemma about the equality of one function and 0. For
example, `Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero`.
Generally useful lemmas which are not related to integrals:
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner`: if for all constants `c`, `fun x => inner c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then
`f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual`: if for all constants `c` in the dual space,
`fun x => c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then `f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
-/
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace NormedSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
section AeEqOfForall
variable {α E 𝕜 : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [RCLike 𝕜]
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : E, (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let s := denseSeq E
have hs : DenseRange s := denseRange_denseSeq E
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, inner (s n) (f x) = (0 : 𝕜) := ae_all_iff.mpr fun n => hf (s n)
refine hf'.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have h_closed : IsClosed {c : E | inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)} :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.inner continuous_const) continuous_const
exact @isClosed_property ℕ E _ s (fun c => inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)) hs h_closed hx _
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => y x
variable (𝕜)
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{t : Set E} (ht : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) {f : α → E}
(hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) (h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases ht with ⟨d, d_count, hd⟩
haveI : Encodable d := d_count.toEncodable
have : ∀ x : d, ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ‖g‖ ≤ 1 ∧ g x = ‖(x : E)‖ :=
fun x => exists_dual_vector'' 𝕜 (x : E)
choose s hs using this
have A : ∀ a : E, a ∈ t → (∀ x, ⟪a, s x⟫ = (0 : 𝕜)) → a = 0 := by
intro a hat ha
contrapose! ha
have a_pos : 0 < ‖a‖ := by simp only [ha, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
have a_mem : a ∈ closure d := hd hat
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : d, dist a x < ‖a‖ / 2 := by
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 a_mem (‖a‖ / 2) (half_pos a_pos) with ⟨x, h'x, hx⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h'x⟩, hx⟩
use x
have I : ‖a‖ / 2 < ‖(x : E)‖ := by
have : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖(x : E)‖ + ‖a - x‖ := norm_le_insert' _ _
have : ‖a - x‖ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rwa [dist_eq_norm] at hx
linarith
intro h
apply lt_irrefl ‖s x x‖
calc
‖s x x‖ = ‖s x (x - a)‖ := by simp only [h, sub_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_sub]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖(x : E) - a‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (hs x).1 _
_ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rw [one_mul]; rwa [dist_eq_norm'] at hx
_ < ‖(x : E)‖ := I
_ = ‖s x x‖ := by rw [(hs x).2, RCLike.norm_coe_norm]
have hfs : ∀ y : d, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := fun y => hf (s y)
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ y : d, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := by rwa [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [hf', h't] with x hx h'x
exact A (f x) h'x hx
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable 𝕜 (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hf
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_univ _)
variable {𝕜}
end AeEqOfForall
variable {α E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section AeEqOfForallSetIntegralEq
section Real
variable {f : α → ℝ}
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
simp_rw [EventuallyLE, Pi.zero_apply]
rw [ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero]
intro b hb_neg
let s := {x | f x ≤ b}
have hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ := nullMeasurableSet_le hf.1.aemeasurable aemeasurable_const
have mus : μ s < ∞ := Integrable.measure_le_lt_top hf hb_neg
have h_int_gt : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ b * μ.real s := by
have h_const_le : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ _ in s, b ∂μ := by
refine setIntegral_mono_ae_restrict hf.integrableOn (integrableOn_const.mpr (Or.inr mus)) ?_
rw [EventuallyLE, ae_restrict_iff₀ (hs.mono μ.restrict_le_self)]
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x hxs => hxs
rwa [setIntegral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm] at h_const_le
contrapose! h_int_gt with H
calc
b * μ.real s < 0 := mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hb_neg <| ENNReal.toReal_pos H mus.ne
_ ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← μ.restrict_toMeasurable mus.ne]
exact hf_zero _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable ..) (by rwa [measure_toMeasurable])
theorem ae_le_of_forall_setIntegral_le {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf_le : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← eventually_sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hg.sub hf) fun s hs => ?_
rw [integral_sub' hg.integrableOn hf.integrableOn, sub_nonneg]
exact hf_le s hs
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter {f : α → ℝ} {t : Set α}
(hf : IntegrableOn f t μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ) :
0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf fun s hs h's => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
apply hf_zero s hs
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at h's
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
apply ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict
intro t t_meas t_lt_top
apply ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter (hf_int_finite t t_meas t_lt_top)
intro s s_meas _
exact
hf_zero _ (s_meas.inter t_meas)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (Set.inter_subset_right)) t_lt_top)
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl.symm.le
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite (fun s hs hμts => ?_) fun s hs hμts => ?_
· rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_int_finite (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
· rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter
(hf_int_finite t ht (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)) fun s hs _ => ?_
refine hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter ht) ?_
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_right).trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
suffices h_and : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 ∧ 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
h_and.1.mp (h_and.2.mono fun x hx1 hx2 => le_antisymm hx2 hx1)
refine
⟨?_,
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf_int_finite
(fun s hs hμs => (hf_zero s hs hμs).symm.le) ht hμt⟩
suffices h_neg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] -f by
refine h_neg.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.neg_apply] at hx
simpa using hx
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (fun s hs hμs => (hf_int_finite s hs hμs).neg)
(fun s hs hμs => ?_) ht hμt
simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply]
rw [integral_neg, neg_nonneg]
exact (hf_zero s hs hμs).le
end Real
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
rcases (hf_int_finite t ht hμt.lt_top).aestronglyMeasurable.isSeparable_ae_range with
⟨u, u_sep, hu⟩
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable ℝ u_sep (fun c => ?_) hu
refine ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real ?_ ?_ ht hμt
· intro s hs hμs
exact ContinuousLinearMap.integrable_comp c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs)
· intro s hs hμs
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs), hf_zero s hs hμs]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero _
theorem ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg' : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)]
exact sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_zero s hs hμs)
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg' ht hμt
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let S := spanningSets μ
rw [← @Measure.restrict_univ _ _ μ, ← iUnion_spanningSets μ, EventuallyEq, ae_iff,
Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion (measurableSet_spanningSets μ))]
rw [Set.inter_iUnion, measure_iUnion_null_iff]
intro n
have h_meas_n : MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets μ n
have hμn : μ (S n) < ∞ := measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n
rw [← Measure.restrict_apply' h_meas_n]
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero h_meas_n hμn.ne
theorem ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite hfg_int hfg
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEFinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact (hf.sub hg).ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg
theorem Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (f : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
theorem Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (f g : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hf_int_finite hg_int_finite hfg
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_finStronglyMeasurable_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
obtain ⟨t, ht_meas, htf_zero, htμ⟩ := hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite
haveI : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict t).trim hm) := by rwa [restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas] at htμ
have htf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0 := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' (MeasurableSet.compl (hm _ ht_meas))]
exact Eventually.of_forall htf_zero
have hf_meas_m : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := hf.stronglyMeasurable
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this htf_zero
refine measure_eq_zero_of_trim_eq_zero hm ?_
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
unfold IntegrableOn
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
refine Integrable.trim hm ?_ hf_meas_m
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
rw [← integral_trim hm hf_meas_m]
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
theorem Integrable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
have hf_Lp : MemLp f 1 μ := memLp_one_iff_integrable.mpr hf
let f_Lp := hf_Lp.toLp f
have hf_f_Lp : f =ᵐ[μ] f_Lp := (MemLp.coeFn_toLp hf_Lp).symm
refine hf_f_Lp.trans ?_
refine Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero f_Lp one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top ?_ ?_
· exact fun s _ _ => Integrable.integrableOn (L1.integrable_coeFn _)
· intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae hf_f_Lp.symm)]
exact hf_zero s hs hμs
theorem Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (f g : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ)
(hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg' : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' hf.integrableOn hg.integrableOn]
exact sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg s hs hμs)
exact Integrable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (hf.sub hg) hfg'
variable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
/-- If an integrable function has zero integral on all closed sets, then it is zero
almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isClosed_eq_zero {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsClosed s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
suffices ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 from
hf.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (fun s hs _ ↦ this s hs)
have A : ∀ (t : Set β), MeasurableSet t → ∫ (x : β) in t, f x ∂μ = 0
→ ∫ (x : β) in tᶜ, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
intro t t_meas ht
have I : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by rw [← setIntegral_univ]; exact h'f _ isClosed_univ
simpa [ht, I] using integral_add_compl t_meas hf
intro s hs
induction s, hs using MeasurableSet.induction_on_open with
| isOpen U hU => exact compl_compl U ▸ A _ hU.measurableSet.compl (h'f _ hU.isClosed_compl)
| compl s hs ihs => exact A s hs ihs
| iUnion g g_disj g_meas hg => simp [integral_iUnion g_meas g_disj hf.integrableOn, hg]
/-- If an integrable function has zero integral on all compact sets in a sigma-compact space, then
it is zero almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero
[SigmaCompactSpace β] [R1Space β] {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsCompact s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
apply ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isClosed_eq_zero hf (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
let t : ℕ → Set β := fun n ↦ closure (compactCovering β n) ∩ s
suffices H : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x in t n, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) by
have A : ∀ n, ∫ x in t n, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
fun n ↦ h'f _ ((isCompact_compactCovering β n).closure.inter_right hs)
simp_rw [A, tendsto_const_nhds_iff] at H
exact H.symm
have B : s = ⋃ n, t n := by
rw [← Set.iUnion_inter, iUnion_closure_compactCovering, Set.univ_inter]
rw [B]
apply tendsto_setIntegral_of_monotone
· intros n
exact (isClosed_closure.inter hs).measurableSet
· intros m n hmn
simp only [t, Set.le_iff_subset]
gcongr
· exact hf.integrableOn
/-- If a locally integrable function has zero integral on all compact sets in a sigma-compact space,
then it is zero almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero'
[SigmaCompactSpace β] [R1Space β] {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsCompact s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← μ.restrict_univ, ← iUnion_closure_compactCovering]
apply (ae_restrict_iUnion_iff _ _).2 (fun n ↦ ?_)
apply ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero
· exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact (isCompact_compactCovering β n).closure
· intro s hs
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict' measurableSet_closure]
exact h'f _ (hs.inter_right isClosed_closure)
end AeEqOfForallSetIntegralEq
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqOfIntegral.lean | 609 | 619 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
| exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 216 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.Coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := fun con => by simp_all [Prod.ext_iff]
simp [y1ne]
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y₂ ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp_all
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul] }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
neg_add_cancel := neg_add_cancel
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [MulAction R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
lemma pmul_assoc [SemigroupWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos), coe_mk]
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
end MonoidWithZero
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp [hf]
| insert _ _ has ih =>
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
theorem map_div_of_coprime [GroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {l d : ℕ} (hdl : d ∣ l) (hl : (l / d).Coprime d) (hd : f d ≠ 0) :
f (l / d) = f l / f d := by
apply (div_eq_of_eq_mul hd ..).symm
rw [← hf.right hl, Nat.div_mul_cancel hdl]
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_intro ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk_inj] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
Nat.multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f := f) (g := g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ∪ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
theorem map_gcd [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_lcm : f (x.lcm y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y / f (x.lcm y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hf_lcm]
theorem map_lcm [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_gcd : f (x.gcd y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.lcm y) = f x * f y / f (x.gcd y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hf_gcd]
theorem eq_zero_of_squarefree_of_dvd_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {m n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hmn : m ∣ n)
(h_zero : f m = 0) :
f n = 0 := by
rcases hmn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
simp only [MulZeroClass.zero_mul, eq_self_iff_true, hf.map_mul_of_coprime
(coprime_of_squarefree_mul hn), h_zero]
end IsMultiplicative
section SpecialFunctions
/-- The identity on `ℕ` as an `ArithmeticFunction`. -/
def id : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨_root_.id, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem id_apply {x : ℕ} : id x = x :=
rfl
/-- `pow k n = n ^ k`, except `pow 0 0 = 0`. -/
def pow (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
id.ppow k
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply {k n : ℕ} : pow k n = if k = 0 ∧ n = 0 then 0 else n ^ k := by
cases k <;> simp [pow]
theorem pow_zero_eq_zeta : pow 0 = ζ := by
ext n
simp
/-- `σ k n` is the sum of the `k`th powers of the divisors of `n` -/
def sigma (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.sigma] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
theorem sigma_apply {k n : ℕ} : σ k n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k :=
rfl
theorem sigma_apply_prime_pow {k p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ k (p ^ i) = ∑ j ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ (j * k) := by
simp [sigma_apply, divisors_prime_pow hp, Nat.pow_mul]
theorem sigma_one_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 1 n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_one_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ 1 (p ^ i) = ∑ k ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ k := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem sigma_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 0 n = #n.divisors := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : σ 0 (p ^ i) = i + 1 := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma {k : ℕ} : ζ * pow k = σ k := by
ext
rw [sigma, zeta_mul_apply]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [pow_apply, if_neg (not_and_of_not_right _ _)]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_one [MonoidWithZero R] : IsMultiplicative (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2
⟨by simp, by
intro m n hm _hn hmn
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with (rfl | hm')
· simp
rw [one_apply_ne, one_apply_ne hm', zero_mul]
rw [Ne, mul_eq_one, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl hm'⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_zeta : IsMultiplicative ζ :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2 ⟨by simp, by simp +contextual⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_id : IsMultiplicative ArithmeticFunction.id :=
⟨rfl, fun {_ _} _ => rfl⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem IsMultiplicative.ppow [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
{k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (f.ppow k) := by
induction k with
| zero => exact isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
| succ k hi => rw [ppow_succ']; apply hf.pmul hi
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_pow {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (pow k) :=
isMultiplicative_id.ppow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_sigma {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (σ k) := by
rw [← zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma]
apply isMultiplicative_zeta.mul isMultiplicative_pow
/-- `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Omega] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
theorem cardFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : Ω n = n.primeFactorsList.length :=
rfl
lemma cardFactors_zero : Ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem cardFactors_one : Ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardFactors_apply]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Ω n = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => List.length_eq_one_iff.2 ⟨n, primeFactorsList_prime h⟩⟩
cases n with | zero => simp at h | succ n =>
rcases List.length_eq_one_iff.1 h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← prod_primeFactorsList n.add_one_ne_zero, hx, List.prod_singleton]
apply prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
rw [hx, List.mem_singleton]
theorem cardFactors_mul {m n : ℕ} (m0 : m ≠ 0) (n0 : n ≠ 0) : Ω (m * n) = Ω m + Ω n := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← factors_eq,
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_mul m0 n0, factors_eq, factors_eq,
Multiset.card_add, Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_card]
theorem cardFactors_multiset_prod {s : Multiset ℕ} (h0 : s.prod ≠ 0) :
Ω s.prod = (Multiset.map Ω s).sum := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons ih => simp_all [cardFactors_mul, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω p = 1 :=
cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime.2 hp
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω (p ^ k) = k := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.length_replicate]
/-- `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardDistinctFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.omega] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
theorem cardDistinctFactors_zero : ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_one : ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardDistinctFactors]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : ω n = n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem cardDistinctFactors_eq_cardFactors_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
ω n = Ω n ↔ Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList h0, cardDistinctFactors_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← n.primeFactorsList.dedup_sublist.eq_of_length h]
apply List.nodup_dedup
· simp [h.dedup, cardFactors]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
ω (p ^ k) = 1 := by
rw [cardDistinctFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.replicate_dedup hk,
List.length_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : ω p = 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow hp one_ne_zero]
/-- `μ` is the Möbius function. If `n` is squarefree with an even number of distinct prime factors,
`μ n = 1`. If `n` is squarefree with an odd number of distinct prime factors, `μ n = -1`.
If `n` is not squarefree, `μ n = 0`. -/
def moebius : ArithmeticFunction ℤ :=
⟨fun n => if Squarefree n then (-1) ^ cardFactors n else 0, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Moebius] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[simp]
theorem moebius_apply_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : Squarefree n) : μ n = (-1) ^ cardFactors n :=
if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬Squarefree n) : μ n = 0 :=
if_neg h
theorem moebius_apply_one : μ 1 = 1 := by simp
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ Squarefree n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· simp [h, pow_ne_zero]
theorem moebius_eq_or (n : ℕ) : μ n = 0 ∨ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
simp only [moebius, coe_mk]
split_ifs
· right
exact neg_one_pow_eq_or ..
· left
rfl
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
have := moebius_eq_or n
aesop
theorem moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : μ l ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, neg_one_sq, one_pow]
theorem abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : |μ l| = 1 := by
simp only [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, abs_pow, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
theorem moebius_sq {n : ℕ} :
μ n ^ 2 = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree h
| · simp only [pow_eq_zero_iff, moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h,
zero_pow (show 2 ≠ 0 by norm_num)]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 1,000 | 1,001 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
| (hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 79 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Infinite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file contains some results about prime numbers which depend on finiteness of sets.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable {a b k m n p : ℕ}
/-- A version of `Nat.exists_infinite_primes` using the `Set.Infinite` predicate. -/
theorem infinite_setOf_prime : { p | Prime p }.Infinite :=
Set.infinite_of_not_bddAbove not_bddAbove_setOf_prime
instance Primes.infinite : Infinite Primes := infinite_setOf_prime.to_subtype
instance Primes.countable : Countable Primes := ⟨⟨coeNat.coe, coe_nat_injective⟩⟩
/-- The prime factors of a natural number as a finset. -/
def primeFactors (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := n.primeFactorsList.toFinset
@[simp] lemma toFinset_factors (n : ℕ) : n.primeFactorsList.toFinset = n.primeFactors := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_primeFactors : p ∈ n.primeFactors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [← toFinset_factors, List.mem_toFinset, mem_primeFactorsList']
lemma mem_primeFactors_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∈ n.primeFactors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by
simp [hn]
lemma primeFactors_mono (hmn : m ∣ n) (hn : n ≠ 0) : primeFactors m ⊆ primeFactors n := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_primeFactors, and_imp]
exact fun p hp hpm _ ↦ ⟨hp, hpm.trans hmn, hn⟩
lemma mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList : p ∈ n.primeFactors ↔ p ∈ n.primeFactorsList := by
simp only [primeFactors, List.mem_toFinset]
lemma prime_of_mem_primeFactors (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactors) : p.Prime := (mem_primeFactors.1 hp).1
lemma dvd_of_mem_primeFactors (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactors) : p ∣ n := (mem_primeFactors.1 hp).2.1
lemma pos_of_mem_primeFactors (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactors) : 0 < p :=
(prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp).pos
lemma le_of_mem_primeFactors (h : p ∈ n.primeFactors) : p ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd (mem_primeFactors.1 h).2.2.bot_lt <| dvd_of_mem_primeFactors h
@[simp] lemma primeFactors_zero : primeFactors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp] lemma primeFactors_one : primeFactors 1 = ∅ := by
ext
simpa using Prime.ne_one
@[simp] lemma primeFactors_eq_empty : n.primeFactors = ∅ ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
constructor
· contrapose!
rintro hn
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpn⟩ := exists_prime_and_dvd hn.2
exact Nonempty.ne_empty <| ⟨_, mem_primeFactors.2 ⟨hp, hpn, hn.1⟩⟩
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_primeFactors {n : ℕ} : n.primeFactors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, primeFactors_eq_empty, not_lt,
Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one]
@[simp] protected lemma Prime.primeFactors (hp : p.Prime) : p.primeFactors = {p} := by
simp [Nat.primeFactors, primeFactorsList_prime hp]
lemma primeFactors_mul (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).primeFactors = a.primeFactors ∪ b.primeFactors := by
ext; simp only [Finset.mem_union, mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList,
mem_primeFactorsList_mul ha hb]
lemma Coprime.primeFactors_mul {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).primeFactors = a.primeFactors ∪ b.primeFactors :=
(List.toFinset.ext <| mem_primeFactorsList_mul_of_coprime hab).trans <| List.toFinset_union _ _
lemma primeFactors_gcd (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.gcd b).primeFactors = a.primeFactors ∩ b.primeFactors := by
ext; simp [dvd_gcd_iff, ha, hb, gcd_ne_zero_left ha]; aesop
@[simp] lemma disjoint_primeFactors (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
Disjoint a.primeFactors b.primeFactors ↔ Coprime a b := by
simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, ← primeFactors_gcd, gcd_ne_zero_left,
| ha, hb]
protected lemma Coprime.disjoint_primeFactors (hab : Coprime a b) :
Disjoint a.primeFactors b.primeFactors :=
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PrimeFin.lean | 97 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Connectivity of subgraphs and induced graphs
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Preconnected` and `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected` give subgraphs
connectivity predicates via `SimpleGraph.subgraph.coe`.
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
/-- A subgraph is preconnected if it is preconnected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
/-- A subgraph is connected if it is connected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
protected lemma Connected.preconnected {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.Preconnected := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.1
protected lemma Connected.nonempty {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.2
theorem singletonSubgraph_connected {v : V} : (G.singletonSubgraph v).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
subst_vars
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_connected {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
obtain rfl | rfl := ha <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hb <;>
first | rfl | (apply Adj.reachable; simp)
lemma top_induce_pair_connected_of_adj {u v : V} (huv : G.Adj u v) :
((⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {u, v}).Connected := by
rw [← subgraphOfAdj_eq_induce huv]
exact subgraphOfAdj_connected huv
@[mono]
protected lemma Connected.mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (hle : H ≤ H') (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
rw [← Subgraph.copy_eq H' H.verts hv H'.Adj rfl]
refine ⟨h.coe.mono ?_⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ hvw
exact hle.2 hvw
protected lemma Connected.mono' {H H' : G.Subgraph}
(hle : ∀ v w, H.Adj v w → H'.Adj v w) (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
exact h.mono ⟨hv.le, hle⟩ hv
protected lemma Connected.sup {H K : G.Subgraph}
(hH : H.Connected) (hK : K.Connected) (hn : (H ⊓ K).verts.Nonempty) :
(H ⊔ K).Connected := by
rw [Subgraph.connected_iff', connected_iff_exists_forall_reachable]
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := hn
exists ⟨u, Or.inl hu⟩
rintro ⟨v, (hv|hv)⟩
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_left : H ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hH ⟨u, hu⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_right : K ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hK ⟨u, hu'⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
/--
This lemma establishes a condition under which a subgraph is the same as a connected component.
Note the asymmetry in the hypothesis `h`: `v` is in `H.verts`, but `w` is not required to be.
-/
lemma Connected.exists_verts_eq_connectedComponentSupp {H : Subgraph G}
(hc : H.Connected) (h : ∀ v ∈ H.verts, ∀ w, G.Adj v w → H.Adj v w) :
∃ c : G.ConnectedComponent, H.verts = c.supp := by
rw [SimpleGraph.ConnectedComponent.exists]
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hc.nonempty
use v
ext w
simp only [ConnectedComponent.mem_supp_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact ⟨fun hw ↦ by simpa using (hc ⟨w, hw⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩).map H.hom,
fun a ↦ a.symm.mem_subgraphVerts h hv⟩
end Subgraph
/-! ### Walks as subgraphs -/
namespace Walk
variable {u v w : V}
/-- The subgraph consisting of the vertices and edges of the walk. -/
@[simp]
protected def toSubgraph {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Subgraph
| nil => G.singletonSubgraph u
| cons h p => G.subgraphOfAdj h ⊔ p.toSubgraph
theorem toSubgraph_cons_nil_eq_subgraphOfAdj (h : G.Adj u v) :
(cons h nil).toSubgraph = G.subgraphOfAdj h := by simp
theorem mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : w ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts ↔ w ∈ p.support := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons h p' ih =>
rename_i x y z
have : w = y ∨ w ∈ p'.support ↔ w ∈ p'.support :=
⟨by rintro (rfl | h) <;> simp [*], by simp +contextual⟩
simp [ih, or_assoc, this]
lemma not_nil_of_adj_toSubgraph {u v} {x : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hadj : p.toSubgraph.Adj w x) :
¬p.Nil := by
cases p <;> simp_all
lemma start_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
lemma end_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
@[simp]
theorem verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.verts = { w | w ∈ p.support } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_verts_toSubgraph
theorem mem_edges_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) {e : Sym2 V} :
e ∈ p.toSubgraph.edgeSet ↔ e ∈ p.edges := by induction p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.edgeSet = { e | e ∈ p.edges } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_edges_toSubgraph
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_append (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph ⊔ q.toSubgraph := by induction p <;> simp [*, sup_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_reverse (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ _ =>
simp only [*, Walk.toSubgraph, reverse_cons, toSubgraph_append, subgraphOfAdj_symm]
rw [sup_comm]
congr
ext <;> simp [-Set.bot_eq_empty]
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_rotate [DecidableEq V] (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).toSubgraph = c.toSubgraph := by
rw [rotate, toSubgraph_append, sup_comm, ← toSubgraph_append, take_spec]
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_map (f : G →g G') (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.map f).toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph.map f := by induction p <;> simp [*, Subgraph.map_sup]
lemma adj_toSubgraph_mapLe {G' : SimpleGraph V} {w x : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : G ≤ G') :
(p.mapLe h).toSubgraph.Adj w x ↔ p.toSubgraph.Adj w x := by
simp only [toSubgraph_map, Subgraph.map_adj]
nth_rewrite 1 [← Hom.ofLE_apply h w, ← Hom.ofLE_apply h x]
simp
| @[simp]
theorem finite_neighborSet_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : (p.toSubgraph.neighborSet w).Finite := by
induction p with
| nil =>
rw [Walk.toSubgraph, neighborSet_singletonSubgraph]
apply Set.toFinite
| cons ha _ ih =>
rw [Walk.toSubgraph, Subgraph.neighborSet_sup]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 198 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 59 | 59 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]
rfl
theorem even_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (s : Stream' α) : even (a₁::a₂::s) = a₁::even s := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem even_tail (s : Stream' α) : even (tail s) = odd s :=
rfl
theorem even_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : even (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁' s₁ => ∃ s₂, s₁' = even (s₁ ⋈ s₂))
(fun s₁' s₁ ⟨s₂, h₁⟩ => by
rw [h₁]
constructor
· rfl
· exact ⟨tail s₂, by rw [interleave_eq, even_cons_cons, tail_cons]⟩)
(Exists.intro s₂ rfl)
theorem interleave_even_odd (s₁ : Stream' α) : even s₁ ⋈ odd s₁ = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s' s => s' = even s ⋈ odd s)
(fun s' s (h : s' = even s ⋈ odd s) => by
rw [h]; constructor
· rfl
· simp [odd_eq, odd_eq, tail_interleave, tail_even])
rfl
theorem get_even : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (even s) n = get s (2 * n)
| 0, _ => rfl
| succ n, s => by
change get (even s) (succ n) = get s (succ (succ (2 * n)))
rw [get_succ, get_succ, tail_even, get_even n]; rfl
theorem get_odd : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (odd s) n = get s (2 * n + 1) := fun n s => by
rw [odd_eq, get_even]; rfl
theorem mem_of_mem_even (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ even s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_even])
theorem mem_of_mem_odd (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ odd s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_odd])
@[simp] theorem nil_append_stream (s : Stream' α) : appendStream' [] s = s :=
rfl
theorem cons_append_stream (a : α) (l : List α) (s : Stream' α) :
appendStream' (a::l) s = a::appendStream' l s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem append_append_stream : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : List α) (s : Stream' α),
l₁ ++ l₂ ++ₛ s = l₁ ++ₛ (l₂ ++ₛ s)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| List.cons a l₁, l₂, s => by
rw [List.cons_append, cons_append_stream, cons_append_stream, append_append_stream l₁]
| lemma get_append_left (h : n < x.length) : (x ++ₛ a).get n = x[n] := by
induction' x with b x ih generalizing n
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 454 | 455 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.Basic
/-!
# Legendre symbol
This file contains results about Legendre symbols.
We define the Legendre symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$ as `legendreSym p a`.
Note the order of arguments! The advantage of this form is that then `legendreSym p`
is a multiplicative map.
The Legendre symbol is used to define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a`
and (odd) natural numbers `b`, which extends the Legendre symbol.
## Main results
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `-1`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_neg_one` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff` for `-1`.
See `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity` for the conditions when `2` and `-2`
are squares:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2`,
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol
-/
open Nat
section Euler
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- Euler's Criterion: A unit `x` of `ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion_units (x : (ZMod p)ˣ) : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ x ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
by_cases hc : p = 2
| · subst hc
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
· have h₀ := FiniteField.unit_isSquare_iff (by rwa [ringChar_zmod_n]) x
have hs : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ IsSquare x := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq x]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
rw [hs]
rwa [card p] at h₀
/-- Euler's Criterion: a nonzero `a : ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/Basic.lean | 48 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
/-!
# Witt polynomials
To endow `WittVector p R` with a ring structure,
we need to study the so-called Witt polynomials.
Fix a base value `p : ℕ`.
The `p`-adic Witt polynomials are an infinite family of polynomials
indexed by a natural number `n`, taking values in an arbitrary ring `R`.
The variables of these polynomials are represented by natural numbers.
The variable set of the `n`th Witt polynomial contains at most `n+1` elements `{0, ..., n}`,
with exactly these variables when `R` has characteristic `0`.
These polynomials are used to define the addition and multiplication operators
on the type of Witt vectors. (While this type itself is not complicated,
the ring operations are what make it interesting.)
When the base `p` is invertible in `R`, the `p`-adic Witt polynomials
form a basis for `MvPolynomial ℕ R`, equivalent to the standard basis.
## Main declarations
* `WittPolynomial p R n`: the `n`-th Witt polynomial, viewed as polynomial over the ring `R`
* `xInTermsOfW p R n`: if `p` is invertible, the polynomial `X n` is contained in the subalgebra
generated by the Witt polynomials. `xInTermsOfW p R n` is the explicit polynomial,
which upon being bound to the Witt polynomials yields `X n`.
* `bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW`: the proof of the claim that
`bind₁ (xInTermsOfW p R) (W_ R n) = X n`
* `bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial`: the converse of the above statement
## Notation
In this file we use the following notation
* `p` is a natural number, typically assumed to be prime.
* `R` and `S` are commutative rings
* `W n` (and `W_ R n` when the ring needs to be explicit) denotes the `n`th Witt polynomial
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open MvPolynomial
open Finset hiding map
open Finsupp (single)
--attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂_hom
variable (p : ℕ)
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `wittPolynomial p R n` is the `n`-th Witt polynomial
with respect to a prime `p` with coefficients in a commutative ring `R`.
It is defined as:
`∑_{i ≤ n} p^i X_i^{p^{n-i}} ∈ R[X_0, X_1, X_2, …]`. -/
noncomputable def wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ R :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), monomial (single i (p ^ (n - i))) ((p : R) ^ i)
theorem wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
wittPolynomial p R n = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), C ((p : R) ^ i) * X i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i -
rw [monomial_eq, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
rw [pow_zero]
/-! We set up notation locally to this file, to keep statements short and comprehensible.
This allows us to simply write `W n` or `W_ ℤ n`. -/
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
open Witt
open MvPolynomial
/-! The first observation is that the Witt polynomial doesn't really depend on the coefficient ring.
If we map the coefficients through a ring homomorphism, we obtain the corresponding Witt polynomial
over the target ring. -/
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map_wittPolynomial (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) : map f (W n) = W n := by
rw [wittPolynomial, map_sum, wittPolynomial]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [map_monomial, RingHom.map_pow, map_natCast]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, map_sum, constantCoeff_monomial]
rw [sum_eq_zero]
rintro i _
| rw [if_neg]
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_gt (pow_pos hp.1.pos _)
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_zero : wittPolynomial p R 0 = X 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, X, sum_singleton, range_one, pow_zero, zero_add, tsub_self]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/WittPolynomial.lean | 125 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
| open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 65 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
| theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 206 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,409 | 1,410 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Spectrum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Rank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Hermitian
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
/-! # Spectral theory of hermitian matrices
This file proves the spectral theorem for matrices. The proof of the spectral theorem is based on
the spectral theorem for linear maps (`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis_apply_self_apply`).
## Tags
spectral theorem, diagonalization theorem -/
namespace Matrix
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
variable {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
namespace IsHermitian
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (hA : A.IsHermitian)
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, indexed by `Fin (Fintype.card n)` where `n` is the index
type of the matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues₀ : Fin (Fintype.card n) → ℝ :=
(isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).eigenvalues finrank_euclideanSpace
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, reusing the index `n` of the matrix entries. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues : n → ℝ := fun i =>
hA.eigenvalues₀ <| (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _)).symm i
/-- A choice of an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvectorBasis : OrthonormalBasis n 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) :=
((isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).eigenvectorBasis finrank_euclideanSpace).reindex
(Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _))
lemma mulVec_eigenvectorBasis (j : n) :
A *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) = (hA.eigenvalues j) • ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) := by
simpa only [eigenvectorBasis, OrthonormalBasis.reindex_apply, toEuclideanLin_apply,
RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul (K := 𝕜)] using
congr(⇑$((isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).apply_eigenvectorBasis
finrank_euclideanSpace ((Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _)).symm j)))
/-- The spectrum of a Hermitian matrix `A` coincides with the spectrum of `toEuclideanLin A`. -/
theorem spectrum_toEuclideanLin : spectrum 𝕜 (toEuclideanLin A) = spectrum 𝕜 A :=
AlgEquiv.spectrum_eq (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv (PiLp.basisFun 2 𝕜 n)) _
/-- Eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix A are in the ℝ spectrum of A. -/
theorem eigenvalues_mem_spectrum_real (i : n) : hA.eigenvalues i ∈ spectrum ℝ A := by
apply spectrum.of_algebraMap_mem 𝕜
rw [← spectrum_toEuclideanLin]
exact LinearMap.IsSymmetric.hasEigenvalue_eigenvalues _ _ _ |>.mem_spectrum
/-- Unitary matrix whose columns are `Matrix.IsHermitian.eigenvectorBasis`. -/
noncomputable def eigenvectorUnitary {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*}
[Fintype n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} [DecidableEq n] (hA : Matrix.IsHermitian A) :
Matrix.unitaryGroup n 𝕜 :=
⟨(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis.toMatrix (hA.eigenvectorBasis).toBasis,
(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toMatrix_orthonormalBasis_mem_unitary (eigenvectorBasis hA)⟩
lemma eigenvectorUnitary_coe {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} [DecidableEq n] (hA : Matrix.IsHermitian A) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA =
(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis.toMatrix (hA.eigenvectorBasis).toBasis :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_transpose_apply (j : n) :
(eigenvectorUnitary hA)ᵀ j = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_apply (i j : n) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA i j = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) i :=
rfl
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec (j : n) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA *ᵥ Pi.single j 1 = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) := by
simp_rw [mulVec_single_one, eigenvectorUnitary_transpose_apply]
theorem star_eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec (j : n) :
(star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) = Pi.single j 1 := by
rw [← eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, unitary.coe_star_mul_self, one_mulVec]
/-- Unitary diagonalization of a Hermitian matrix. -/
theorem star_mul_self_mul_eq_diagonal :
(star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) * A * (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)
= diagonal (RCLike.ofReal ∘ hA.eigenvalues) := by
apply Matrix.toEuclideanLin.injective
apply Basis.ext (EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis
intro i
simp only [toEuclideanLin_apply, OrthonormalBasis.coe_toBasis, EuclideanSpace.basisFun_apply,
WithLp.equiv_single, ← mulVec_mulVec, eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, ← mulVec_mulVec,
mulVec_eigenvectorBasis, Matrix.diagonal_mulVec_single, mulVec_smul,
star_eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul (K := 𝕜), WithLp.equiv_symm_smul,
WithLp.equiv_symm_single, Function.comp_apply, mul_one, WithLp.equiv_symm_single]
apply PiLp.ext
intro j
simp only [PiLp.smul_apply, EuclideanSpace.single_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero]
/-- **Diagonalization theorem**, **spectral theorem** for matrices; A hermitian matrix can be
diagonalized by a change of basis. For the spectral theorem on linear maps, see
`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis_apply_self_apply`. -/
theorem spectral_theorem :
A = (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜) * diagonal (RCLike.ofReal ∘ hA.eigenvalues)
* (star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) := by
rw [← star_mul_self_mul_eq_diagonal, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
(Matrix.mem_unitaryGroup_iff).mp (eigenvectorUnitary hA).2, mul_one,
← mul_assoc, (Matrix.mem_unitaryGroup_iff).mp (eigenvectorUnitary hA).2, one_mul]
theorem eigenvalues_eq (i : n) :
(hA.eigenvalues i) = RCLike.re (dotProduct (star ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis i))
(A *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis i))) := by
rw [dotProduct_comm]
simp only [mulVec_eigenvectorBasis, smul_dotProduct, ← EuclideanSpace.inner_eq_star_dotProduct,
inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, RCLike.smul_re, hA.eigenvectorBasis.orthonormal.1 i,
mul_one, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow, RCLike.one_re]
/-- The determinant of a hermitian matrix is the product of its eigenvalues. -/
theorem det_eq_prod_eigenvalues : det A = ∏ i, (hA.eigenvalues i : 𝕜) := by
convert congr_arg det hA.spectral_theorem
rw [det_mul_right_comm]
simp
/-- rank of a hermitian matrix is the rank of after diagonalization by the eigenvector unitary -/
lemma rank_eq_rank_diagonal : A.rank = (Matrix.diagonal hA.eigenvalues).rank := by
conv_lhs => rw [hA.spectral_theorem, ← unitary.coe_star]
simp [-isUnit_iff_ne_zero, -unitary.coe_star, rank_diagonal]
/-- rank of a hermitian matrix is the number of nonzero eigenvalues of the hermitian matrix -/
lemma rank_eq_card_non_zero_eigs : A.rank = Fintype.card {i // hA.eigenvalues i ≠ 0} := by
rw [rank_eq_rank_diagonal hA, Matrix.rank_diagonal]
end DecidableEq
/-- A nonzero Hermitian matrix has an eigenvector with nonzero eigenvalue. -/
lemma exists_eigenvector_of_ne_zero (hA : IsHermitian A) (h_ne : A ≠ 0) :
∃ (v : n → 𝕜) (t : ℝ), t ≠ 0 ∧ v ≠ 0 ∧ A *ᵥ v = t • v := by
classical
have : hA.eigenvalues ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h_ne
have := hA.spectral_theorem
rwa [h_ne, Pi.comp_zero, RCLike.ofReal_zero, (by rfl : Function.const n (0 : 𝕜) = fun _ ↦ 0),
diagonal_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Function.ne_iff.mp this
exact ⟨_, _, hi, hA.eigenvectorBasis.orthonormal.ne_zero i, hA.mulVec_eigenvectorBasis i⟩
| end IsHermitian
end Matrix
/-The following were removed as a result of the refactor, since they either were
unused in the library, followed as immediate consequences of, or were replaced by
above results (e.g. results about inverses don't need replacement because their unitary
analogues have replaced them). -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Spectrum.lean | 159 | 169 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lawrence Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lawrence Wu
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Bounding of integrals by asymptotics
We establish integrability of `f` from `f = O(g)`.
## Main results
* `Asymptotics.IsBigO.integrableAtFilter`: If `f = O[l] g` on measurably generated `l`,
`f` is strongly measurable at `l`, and `g` is integrable at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_cocompact`: If `f` is locally integrable,
and `f =O[cocompact] g` for some `g` integrable at `cocompact`, then `f` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atBot_atTop`: If `f` is locally integrable,
and `f =O[atBot] g`, `f =O[atTop] g'` for some `g`, `g'` integrable `atBot` and `atTop`
respectively, then `f` is integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atTop_of_norm_isNegInvariant`:
If `f` is locally integrable, `‖f(-x)‖ = ‖f(x)‖`, and `f =O[atTop] g` for some
`g` integrable `atTop`, then `f` is integrable.
-/
open Asymptotics MeasureTheory Set Filter
variable {α E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {a : α} {l : Filter α}
namespace Asymptotics
section Basic
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {μ : Measure α}
/-- If `f = O[l] g` on measurably generated `l`, `f` is strongly measurable at `l`,
and `g` is integrable at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
theorem IsBigO.integrableAtFilter [IsMeasurablyGenerated l]
(hf : f =O[l] g) (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hf.bound
obtain ⟨s, hsl, hsm, hfg, hf, hg⟩ :=
(hC.smallSets.and <| hfm.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists_measurable_mem_of_smallSets
refine ⟨s, hsl, (hg.norm.const_mul C).mono hf ?_⟩
refine (ae_restrict_mem hsm).mono fun x hx ↦ ?_
exact (hfg x hx).trans (le_abs_self _)
/-- Variant of `MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono` taking `f =O[⊤] (g)` instead of `‖f(x)‖ ≤ ‖g(x)‖` -/
theorem IsBigO.integrable (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : f =O[⊤] g) (hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable f μ := by
rewrite [← integrableAtFilter_top] at *
exact hf.integrableAtFilter ⟨univ, univ_mem, hfm.restrict⟩ hg
end Basic
variable {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace ι] {f : ι × α → E} {s : Set ι} {μ : Measure ι}
/-- Let `f : X x Y → Z`. If as `y` tends to `l`, `f(x, y) = O(g(y))` uniformly on `s : Set X`
of finite measure, then f is eventually (as `y` tends to `l`) integrable along `s`. -/
theorem IsBigO.eventually_integrableOn [Norm F]
(hf : f =O[𝓟 s ×ˢ l] (g ∘ Prod.snd))
(hfm : ∀ᶠ x in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun i ↦ f (i, x)) (μ.restrict s))
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμ : μ s < ⊤) :
∀ᶠ x in l, IntegrableOn (fun i ↦ f (i, x)) s μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hf.bound
obtain ⟨t, htl, ht⟩ := hC.exists_mem
obtain ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huv⟩ := Filter.mem_prod_iff.mp htl
obtain ⟨w, hwl, hw⟩ := hfm.exists_mem
refine eventually_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨w ∩ v, inter_mem hwl hv, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
haveI : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨Measure.restrict_apply_univ s ▸ hμ⟩
refine Integrable.mono' (integrable_const (C * ‖g x‖)) (hw x hx.1) ?_
filter_upwards [MeasureTheory.self_mem_ae_restrict hs]
intro y hy
exact ht (y, x) <| huv ⟨hu hy, hx.2⟩
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
/-- Let `f : X x Y → Z`. If as `y` tends to `l`, `f(x, y) = O(g(y))` uniformly on `s : Set X`
| of finite measure, then the integral of `f` along `s` is `O(g(y))`. -/
theorem IsBigO.set_integral_isBigO
(hf : f =O[𝓟 s ×ˢ l] (g ∘ Prod.snd)) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμ : μ s < ⊤) :
(fun x ↦ ∫ i in s, f (i, x) ∂μ) =O[l] g := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hf.bound
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Asymptotics.lean | 81 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Submonoid.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Semiring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction.Pointwise
/-!
# Multiplication and division of submodules of an algebra.
An interface for multiplication and division of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A is developed.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or semiring) and let `A` be an `R`-algebra.
* `1 : Submodule R A` : the R-submodule R of the R-algebra A
* `Mul (Submodule R A)` : multiplication of two sub-R-modules M and N of A is defined to be
the smallest submodule containing all the products `m * n`.
* `Div (Submodule R A)` : `I / J` is defined to be the submodule consisting of all `a : A` such
that `a • J ⊆ I`
It is proved that `Submodule R A` is a semiring, and also an algebra over `Set A`.
Additionally, in the `Pointwise` locale we promote `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction` to a
`MulSemiringAction` as `Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction`.
When `R` is not necessarily commutative, and `A` is merely a `R`-module with a ring structure
such that `IsScalarTower R A A` holds (equivalent to the data of a ring homomorphism `R →+* A`
by `ringHomEquivModuleIsScalarTower`), we can still define `1 : Submodule R A` and
`Mul (Submodule R A)`, but `1` is only a left identity, not necessarily a right one.
## Tags
multiplication of submodules, division of submodules, submodule semiring
-/
universe uι u v
open Algebra Set MulOpposite
open Pointwise
namespace SubMulAction
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) :=
⟨r, (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm⟩
theorem mem_one' {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
end SubMulAction
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Module R A]
-- TODO: Why is this in a file about `Algebra`?
-- TODO: potentially change this back to `LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A)`
-- once a version of `Algebra` without the `commutes'` field is introduced.
-- See issue https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/18110.
/-- `1 : Submodule R A` is the submodule `R ∙ 1` of `A`.
-/
instance one : One (Submodule R A) :=
⟨LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R A 1)⟩
theorem one_eq_span : (1 : Submodule R A) = R ∙ 1 :=
(LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range _ _ _).symm
theorem le_one_toAddSubmonoid : 1 ≤ (1 : Submodule R A).toAddSubmonoid := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, show (n : R) • (1 : A) = n by rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul, nsmul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubMulAction_one : (1 : Submodule R A).toSubMulAction = 1 :=
SetLike.ext fun _ ↦ by rw [one_eq_span, SubMulAction.mem_one]; exact mem_span_singleton
theorem one_eq_span_one_set : (1 : Submodule R A) = span R 1 :=
one_eq_span
@[simp]
theorem one_le {P : Submodule R A} : (1 : Submodule R A) ≤ P ↔ (1 : A) ∈ P := by
simp [one_eq_span]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
instance : SMul (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) where
smul A' M' :=
{ __ := A'.toAddSubmonoid • M'.toAddSubmonoid
smul_mem' := fun r m hm ↦ AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on hm
(fun a ha m hm ↦ by rw [← smul_assoc]; exact AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul (A'.smul_mem r ha) hm)
fun m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ ↦ by rw [smul_add]; exact (A'.1 • M'.1).add_mem h₁ h₂ }
section
variable {I J : Submodule R A} {N P : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_toAddSubmonoid : (I • N).toAddSubmonoid = I.toAddSubmonoid • N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul hr hn
theorem smul_le : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, r • n ∈ P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_set_smul : (I : Set A) • N = I • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(fun _ _ hr hx ↦ smul_mem_smul hr hx)
(smul_le.mpr fun _ hr _ hx ↦ mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem hr hx)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N) (smul : ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, p (r • n))
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) : p x :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on H smul add
/-- Dependent version of `Submodule.smul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on' {x : M} (hx : x ∈ I • N) {p : ∀ x, x ∈ I • N → Prop}
(smul : ∀ (r : A) (hr : r ∈ I) (n : M) (hn : n ∈ N), p (r • n) (smul_mem_smul hr hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (h : x ∈ I • N) (H : p x h) ↦ H
exact smul_induction_on hx (fun a ha x hx ↦ ⟨_, smul _ ha _ hx⟩)
fun x y ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le_smul hij hnp
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h le_rfl
instance : CovariantClass (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) HSMul.hSMul LE.le :=
⟨fun _ _ => smul_mono le_rfl⟩
variable (I J N P)
@[simp]
theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : Submodule R A) • N = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp <| smul_le.mpr <| by rintro _ rfl _ _; rw [zero_smul]; exact zero_mem _
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, sup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_sup]
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun mn hmn p hp ↦ by
obtain ⟨m, hm, n, hn, rfl⟩ := mem_sup.mp hmn
rw [add_smul]; exact add_mem_sup (smul_mem_smul hm hp) <| smul_mem_smul hn hp)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left) <| smul_mono_left le_sup_right)
protected theorem smul_assoc {B} [Semiring B] [Module R B] [Module A B] [Module B M]
[IsScalarTower R A B] [IsScalarTower R B M] [IsScalarTower A B M]
(I : Submodule R A) (J : Submodule R B) (N : Submodule R M) :
(I • J) • N = I • J • N :=
le_antisymm
(smul_le.2 fun _ hrsij t htn ↦ smul_induction_on hrsij
(fun r hr s hs ↦ smul_assoc r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
fun x y ↦ (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ add_mem)
(smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hsn ↦ smul_induction_on hsn
(fun j hj n hn ↦ (smul_assoc r j n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hj) hn)
fun m₁ m₂ ↦ (smul_add r m₁ m₂) ▸ add_mem)
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {I : Submodule R A} {t : ι → Submodule R M} :
I • (⨆ i, t i)= ⨆ i, I • t i :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, iSup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.smul_iSup]
theorem iSup_smul {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → Submodule R A} {N : Submodule R M} :
(⨆ i, t i) • N = ⨆ i, t i • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun t ht s hs ↦ iSup_induction _ (motive := (· • s ∈ _)) ht
(fun i t ht ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| smul_mem_smul ht hs)
(by simp_rw [zero_smul]; apply zero_mem) fun x y ↦ by simp_rw [add_smul]; apply add_mem)
(iSup_le fun i ↦ Submodule.smul_mono_left <| le_iSup _ i)
protected theorem one_smul : (1 : Submodule R A) • N = N := by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun r hr m hm ↦ ?_) fun m hm ↦ ?_
· obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply, smul_one_smul]; exact N.smul_mem r hm
· rw [← one_smul A m]; exact smul_mem_smul (one_le.mp le_rfl) hm
theorem smul_subset_smul : (↑I : Set A) • (↑N : Set M) ⊆ (↑(I • N) : Set M) :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_subset_smul
end
variable [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- Multiplication of sub-R-modules of an R-module A that is also a semiring. The submodule `M * N`
consists of finite sums of elements `m * n` for `m ∈ M` and `n ∈ N`. -/
instance mul : Mul (Submodule R A) where
mul := (· • ·)
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem mul_mem_mul (hm : m ∈ M) (hn : n ∈ N) : m * n ∈ M * N :=
smul_mem_smul hm hn
theorem mul_le : M * N ≤ P ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, m * n ∈ P :=
smul_le
theorem mul_toAddSubmonoid (M N : Submodule R A) :
(M * N).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid * N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on {C : A → Prop} {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N)
(hm : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, C (m * n)) (ha : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C r :=
smul_induction_on hr hm ha
/-- A dependent version of `mul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on' {C : ∀ r, r ∈ M * N → Prop}
(mem_mul_mem : ∀ m (hm : m ∈ M) n (hn : n ∈ N), C (m * n) (mul_mem_mul hm hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N) :
C r hr :=
smul_induction_on' hr mem_mul_mem add
variable (M)
@[simp]
theorem mul_bot : M * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * M = ⊥ :=
bot_smul _
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : Submodule R A) * M = M :=
Submodule.one_smul _
variable {M}
@[mono]
theorem mul_le_mul (hmp : M ≤ P) (hnq : N ≤ Q) : M * N ≤ P * Q :=
smul_mono hmp hnq
theorem mul_le_mul_left (h : M ≤ N) : M * P ≤ N * P :=
smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_le_mul_right (h : N ≤ P) : M * N ≤ M * P :=
smul_mono_right _ h
theorem mul_comm_of_commute (h : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, Commute m n) : M * N = N * M :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.mul_comm_of_commute h
variable (M N P)
theorem mul_sup : M * (N ⊔ P) = M * N ⊔ M * P :=
smul_sup _ _ _
theorem sup_mul : (M ⊔ N) * P = M * P ⊔ N * P :=
sup_smul _ _ _
theorem mul_subset_mul : (↑M : Set A) * (↑N : Set A) ⊆ (↑(M * N) : Set A) :=
smul_subset_smul _ _
lemma restrictScalars_mul {A B C} [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Semiring C]
[SMul A B] [Module A C] [Module B C] [IsScalarTower A C C] [IsScalarTower B C C]
[IsScalarTower A B C] {I J : Submodule B C} :
(I * J).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A * J.restrictScalars A :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort uι}
theorem iSup_mul (s : ι → Submodule R A) (t : Submodule R A) : (⨆ i, s i) * t = ⨆ i, s i * t :=
iSup_smul
theorem mul_iSup (t : Submodule R A) (s : ι → Submodule R A) : (t * ⨆ i, s i) = ⨆ i, t * s i :=
smul_iSup
/-- Sub-`R`-modules of an `R`-module form an idempotent semiring. -/
instance : NonUnitalSemiring (Submodule R A) where
__ := toAddSubmonoid_injective.semigroup _ mul_toAddSubmonoid
zero_mul := bot_mul
mul_zero := mul_bot
left_distrib := mul_sup
right_distrib := sup_mul
instance : Pow (Submodule R A) ℕ where
pow s n := npowRec n s
theorem pow_eq_npowRec {n : ℕ} : M ^ n = npowRec n M := rfl
protected theorem pow_zero : M ^ 0 = 1 := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ {n : ℕ} : M ^ (n + 1) = M ^ n * M := rfl
protected theorem pow_add {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : M ^ (m + n) = M ^ m * M ^ n :=
npowRec_add m n h _ M.one_mul
protected theorem pow_one : M ^ 1 = M := by
rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.one_mul]
/-- `Submodule.pow_succ` with the right hand side commuted. -/
protected theorem pow_succ' {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : M ^ (n + 1) = M * M ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, M.pow_add h, Submodule.pow_one]
theorem pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => exact (h rfl).elim
| succ n ih =>
rw [Submodule.pow_succ, pow_succ, mul_toAddSubmonoid]
cases n with
| zero => rw [Submodule.pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul, ← mul_toAddSubmonoid, Submodule.one_mul]
| succ n => rw [ih n.succ_ne_zero]
theorem le_pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} : M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n ≤ (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid := by
obtain rfl | hn := Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, pow_zero]
exact le_one_toAddSubmonoid
· exact (pow_toAddSubmonoid M hn).ge
theorem pow_subset_pow {n : ℕ} : (↑M : Set A) ^ n ⊆ ↑(M ^ n : Submodule R A) :=
trans AddSubmonoid.pow_subset_pow (le_pow_toAddSubmonoid M)
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : A} (hx : x ∈ M) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ M ^ n :=
pow_subset_pow _ <| Set.pow_mem_pow hx
lemma restrictScalars_pow {A B C : Type*} [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Semiring C] [SMul A B] [Module A C] [Module B C]
[IsScalarTower A C C] [IsScalarTower B C C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
{I : Submodule B C} :
∀ {n : ℕ}, (hn : n ≠ 0) → (I ^ n).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A ^ n
| 1, _ => by simp [Submodule.pow_one]
| n + 2, _ => by
simp [Submodule.pow_succ (n := n + 1), restrictScalars_mul, restrictScalars_pow n.succ_ne_zero]
end Module
variable {ι : Sort uι}
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R]
section AlgebraSemiring
variable {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem one_eq_range : (1 : Submodule R A) = LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A) := by
rw [one_eq_span, LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_eq_algebra_linearMap]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) := by
simp [one_eq_range]
@[simp]
theorem mem_one {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x := by
simp [one_eq_range]
protected theorem map_one {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
map f.toLinearMap (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem map_op_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext x
induction x
simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_op_one :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem map_unop_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by
rw [← comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, comap_op_one]
@[simp]
theorem comap_unop_one :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
rw [← map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_op_one]
theorem mul_eq_map₂ : M * N = map₂ (LinearMap.mul R A) M N :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ mul_mem_mul hm)
variable (R M N)
theorem span_mul_span : span R S * span R T = span R (S * T) := by
rw [mul_eq_map₂]; apply map₂_span_span
lemma mul_def : M * N = span R (M * N : Set A) := by simp [← span_mul_span]
variable {R} (P Q)
protected theorem mul_one : M * 1 = M := by
conv_lhs => rw [one_eq_span, ← span_eq M]
rw [span_mul_span]
simp
protected theorem map_mul {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
map f.toLinearMap (M * N) = map f.toLinearMap M * map f.toLinearMap N :=
calc
map f.toLinearMap (M * N) = ⨆ i : M, (N.map (LinearMap.mul R A i)).map f.toLinearMap := by
rw [mul_eq_map₂]; apply map_iSup
_ = map f.toLinearMap M * map f.toLinearMap N := by
rw [mul_eq_map₂]
apply congr_arg sSup
ext S
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
· use ⟨f y, mem_map.mpr ⟨y.1, y.2, rfl⟩⟩
refine Eq.trans ?_ hy
ext
simp
· obtain ⟨y', hy', fy_eq⟩ := mem_map.mp y.2
use ⟨y', hy'⟩
refine Eq.trans ?_ hy
rw [f.toLinearMap_apply] at fy_eq
ext
simp [fy_eq]
theorem map_op_mul :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M * N) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) N *
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M := by
apply le_antisymm
· simp_rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
refine mul_le.2 fun m hm n hn => ?_
rw [mem_comap, map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_equiv_eq_comap_symm]
show op n * op m ∈ _
exact mul_mem_mul hn hm
· refine mul_le.2 (MulOpposite.rec' fun m hm => MulOpposite.rec' fun n hn => ?_)
rw [Submodule.mem_map_equiv] at hm hn ⊢
exact mul_mem_mul hn hm
theorem comap_unop_mul :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M * N) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) N *
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M := by
simp_rw [← map_equiv_eq_comap_symm, map_op_mul]
theorem map_unop_mul (M N : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (M * N) =
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) N *
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) M :=
have : Function.Injective (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) :=
LinearEquiv.injective _
map_injective_of_injective this <| by
rw [← map_comp, map_op_mul, ← map_comp, ← map_comp, LinearEquiv.comp_coe,
LinearEquiv.symm_trans_self, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap, map_id, map_id, map_id]
| theorem comap_op_mul (M N : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (M * N) =
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) N *
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) M := by
simp_rw [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_unop_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Operations.lean | 462 | 466 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
fun h x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_map.1 hx
exact h _ hy⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (x : s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) = f '' s :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_map, Set.mem_image, implies_true])
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.map f) = f '' s := coe_map f s
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem map_perm {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : s.map (σ : α ↪ α) = s :=
coe_injective <| (coe_map _ _).trans <| Set.image_perm hs
theorem map_toFinset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.map f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_map, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : s.map (Embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem map_cast_heq {α β} (h : α = β) (s : Finset α) :
HEq (s.map (Equiv.cast h).toEmbedding) s := by
subst h
simp
theorem map_map (f : α ↪ β) (g : β ↪ γ) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
theorem map_comm {β'} {f : β ↪ γ} {g : α ↪ β} {f' : α ↪ β'} {g' : β' ↪ γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.map g).map f = (s.map f').map g' := by
simp_rw [map_map, Embedding.trans, Function.comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_map {f : α ↪ β} {ga : α ↪ α} {gb : β ↪ β}
| (h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) := fun _ =>
map_comm h
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 130 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# `Tendsto` for relations and partial functions
This file generalizes `Filter` definitions from functions to partial functions and relations.
## Considering functions and partial functions as relations
A function `f : α → β` can be considered as the relation `Rel α β` which relates `x` and `f x` for
all `x`, and nothing else. This relation is called `Function.Graph f`.
A partial function `f : α →. β` can be considered as the relation `Rel α β` which relates `x` and
`f x` for all `x` for which `f x` exists, and nothing else. This relation is called
`PFun.Graph' f`.
In this regard, a function is a relation for which every element in `α` is related to exactly one
element in `β` and a partial function is a relation for which every element in `α` is related to at
most one element in `β`.
This file leverages this analogy to generalize `Filter` definitions from functions to partial
functions and relations.
## Notes
`Set.preimage` can be generalized to relations in two ways:
* `Rel.preimage` returns the image of the set under the inverse relation.
* `Rel.core` returns the set of elements that are only related to those in the set.
Both generalizations are sensible in the context of filters, so `Filter.comap` and `Filter.Tendsto`
get two generalizations each.
We first take care of relations. Then the definitions for partial functions are taken as special
cases of the definitions for relations.
-/
universe u v w
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Filter
/-! ### Relations -/
/-- The forward map of a filter under a relation. Generalization of `Filter.map` to relations. Note
that `Rel.core` generalizes `Set.preimage`. -/
def rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | r.core s ∈ l }
univ_sets := by simp
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs (Rel.core_mono _ st)
inter_sets hs ht := by
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
convert inter_mem hs ht
rw [← Rel.core_inter]
theorem rmap_sets (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : (l.rmap r).sets = r.core ⁻¹' l.sets :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) (s : Set β) : s ∈ l.rmap r ↔ r.core s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem rmap_rmap (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter α) :
rmap s (rmap r l) = rmap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq <| by simp [rmap_sets, Set.preimage, Rel.core_comp]
@[simp]
theorem rmap_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rmap s ∘ rmap r = rmap (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rmap_rmap _ _
/-- Generic "limit of a relation" predicate. `RTendsto r l₁ l₂` asserts that for every
`l₂`-neighborhood `a`, the `r`-core of `a` is an `l₁`-neighborhood. One generalization of
`Filter.Tendsto` to relations. -/
def RTendsto (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁.rmap r ≤ l₂
theorem rtendsto_def (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.core s ∈ l₁ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- One way of taking the inverse map of a filter under a relation. One generalization of
`Filter.comap` to relations. Note that `Rel.core` generalizes `Set.preimage`. -/
def rcomap (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := Rel.image (fun s t => r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨Set.univ, univ_mem, Set.subset_univ _⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, (r.core_inter a' b').subset.trans (Set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩
theorem rcomap_sets (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) :
(rcomap r f).sets = Rel.image (fun s t => r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets :=
rfl
theorem rcomap_rcomap (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter γ) :
rcomap r (rcomap s l) = rcomap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq <| by
ext t; simp only [rcomap_sets, Rel.image, Filter.mem_sets, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Rel.core_comp]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨v, vsets, Set.Subset.trans (Rel.core_mono _ hv) h⟩
rintro ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩
exact ⟨Rel.core s t, ⟨t, tsets, Set.Subset.rfl⟩, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem rcomap_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rcomap r ∘ rcomap s = rcomap (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rcomap_rcomap _ _
theorem rtendsto_iff_le_rcomap (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap r := by
rw [rtendsto_def]
simp_rw [← l₂.mem_sets]
constructor
· simpa [Filter.le_def, rcomap, Rel.mem_image] using fun h s t tl₂ => mem_of_superset (h t tl₂)
· simpa [Filter.le_def, rcomap, Rel.mem_image] using fun h t tl₂ => h _ t tl₂ Set.Subset.rfl
-- Interestingly, there does not seem to be a way to express this relation using a forward map.
-- Given a filter `f` on `α`, we want a filter `f'` on `β` such that `r.preimage s ∈ f` if
-- and only if `s ∈ f'`. But the intersection of two sets satisfying the lhs may be empty.
/-- One way of taking the inverse map of a filter under a relation. Generalization of `Filter.comap`
to relations. -/
def rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) : Filter α where
sets := Rel.image (fun s t => r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets
univ_sets := ⟨Set.univ, univ_mem, Set.subset_univ _⟩
sets_of_superset := fun ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab => ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩
inter_sets := fun ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩ =>
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁,
(@Rel.preimage_inter _ _ r _ _).trans (Set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter β) (s : Set α) :
s ∈ l.rcomap' r ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, r.preimage t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rcomap'_sets (r : Rel α β) (f : Filter β) :
(rcomap' r f).sets = Rel.image (fun s t => r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rcomap'_rcomap' (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter γ) :
rcomap' r (rcomap' s l) = rcomap' (r.comp s) l :=
Filter.ext fun t => by
simp only [mem_rcomap', Rel.preimage_comp]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨v, vsets, (Rel.preimage_mono _ hv).trans h⟩
rintro ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩
exact ⟨s.preimage t, ⟨t, tsets, Set.Subset.rfl⟩, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem rcomap'_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rcomap' r ∘ rcomap' s = rcomap' (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rcomap'_rcomap' _ _
/-- Generic "limit of a relation" predicate. `RTendsto' r l₁ l₂` asserts that for every
`l₂`-neighborhood `a`, the `r`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁`-neighborhood. One generalization of
`Filter.Tendsto` to relations. -/
def RTendsto' (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :=
l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap' r
theorem rtendsto'_def (r : Rel α β) (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) :
RTendsto' r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.preimage s ∈ l₁ := by
unfold RTendsto' rcomap'; constructor
· simpa [le_def, Rel.mem_image] using fun h s hs => h _ _ hs Set.Subset.rfl
· simpa [le_def, Rel.mem_image] using fun h s t ht => mem_of_superset (h t ht)
theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ RTendsto (Function.graph f) l₁ l₂ := by
simp [tendsto_def, Function.graph, rtendsto_def, Rel.core, Set.preimage]
theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto' (l₁ : Filter α) (l₂ : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
Tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ RTendsto' (Function.graph f) l₁ l₂ := by
simp [tendsto_def, Function.graph, rtendsto'_def, Rel.preimage_def, Set.preimage]
/-! ### Partial functions -/
/-- The forward map of a filter under a partial function. Generalization of `Filter.map` to partial
functions. -/
def pmap (f : α →. β) (l : Filter α) : Filter β :=
Filter.rmap f.graph' l
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap (f : α →. β) (l : Filter α) (s : Set β) : s ∈ l.pmap f ↔ f.core s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
| /-- Generic "limit of a partial function" predicate. `PTendsto r l₁ l₂` asserts that for every
`l₂`-neighborhood `a`, the `p`-core of `a` is an `l₁`-neighborhood. One generalization of
`Filter.Tendsto` to partial function. -/
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Partial.lean | 195 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
| theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 586 | 601 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
end Liftp'
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_diag {α} : dropFun (@prod.diag (n + 1) α) = prod.diag := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (subtypeVal p) = subtypeVal _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (subtypeVal p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (toSubtype p) = toSubtype _ := by
ext i
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (toSubtype p) = _root_.id := by
ext i : 2
induction i; simp [dropFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (ofSubtype p) = ofSubtype _ := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (ofSubtype p) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_RelLast' {α : TypeVec n} {β} (R : β → β → Prop) :
dropFun (RelLast' α R) = repeatEq α :=
rfl
attribute [simp] drop_append1'
open MvFunctor
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
dropFun (f ⊗' f') = (dropFun f ⊗' dropFun f') := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
lastFun (f ⊗' f') = Prod.map (lastFun f) (lastFun f') := by
ext i : 1
induction i; simp [lastFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
dropFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
lastFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_id {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : dropFun (@TypeVec.id _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_id {α β : TypeVec n} : (@TypeVec.id _ α ⊗' @TypeVec.id _ β) = id := by
ext i x : 2
induction i <;> simp only [TypeVec.prod.map, *, dropFun_id]
cases x
· rfl
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeVal_diagSub {α : TypeVec n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp [comp, diagSub, subtypeVal, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih =>
simp only [comp, subtypeVal, diagSub, prod.diag] at *
apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype_of_subtype {α : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
toSubtype p ⊚ ofSubtype p = id := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [id, toSubtype, comp, ofSubtype] at *
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem subtypeVal_toSubtype {α : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
subtypeVal p ⊚ toSubtype p = fun _ => Subtype.val := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [toSubtype, comp, subtypeVal] at *
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype_of_subtype_assoc
{α β : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (f : β ⟹ Subtype_ p) :
@toSubtype n _ p ⊚ ofSubtype _ ⊚ f = f := by
rw [← comp_assoc, toSubtype_of_subtype]; simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype'_of_subtype' {α : TypeVec n} (r : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
toSubtype' r ⊚ ofSubtype' r = id := by
ext i x
induction i
<;> dsimp only [id, toSubtype', comp, ofSubtype'] at *
<;> simp [Subtype.eta, *]
theorem subtypeVal_toSubtype' {α : TypeVec n} (r : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
subtypeVal r ⊚ toSubtype' r = fun i x => prod.mk i x.1.fst x.1.snd := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [id, toSubtype', comp, subtypeVal, prod.mk] at *
simp [*]
end TypeVec
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 730 | 733 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.EquivalenceGroupAddGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
/-!
# Monomorphisms and epimorphisms in `Group`
In this file, we prove monomorphisms in the category of groups are injective homomorphisms and
epimorphisms are surjective homomorphisms.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
namespace MonoidHom
open QuotientGroup
variable {A : Type u} {B : Type v}
section
variable [Group A] [Group B]
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_cancel {f : A →* B} (h : ∀ u v : f.ker →* A, f.comp u = f.comp v → u = v) :
f.ker = ⊥ := by simpa using congr_arg range (h f.ker.subtype 1 (by aesop_cat))
end
section
variable [CommGroup A] [CommGroup B]
@[to_additive]
theorem range_eq_top_of_cancel {f : A →* B}
(h : ∀ u v : B →* B ⧸ f.range, u.comp f = v.comp f → u = v) : f.range = ⊤ := by
specialize h 1 (QuotientGroup.mk' _) _
· ext1 x
simp only [one_apply, coe_comp, coe_mk', Function.comp_apply]
rw [show (1 : B ⧸ f.range) = (1 : B) from QuotientGroup.mk_one _, QuotientGroup.eq, inv_one,
one_mul]
exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
replace h : (QuotientGroup.mk' f.range).ker = (1 : B →* B ⧸ f.range).ker := by rw [h]
rwa [ker_one, QuotientGroup.ker_mk'] at h
end
end MonoidHom
section
open CategoryTheory
namespace Grp
variable {A B : Grp.{u}} (f : A ⟶ B)
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_mono [Mono f] : f.hom.ker = ⊥ :=
MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_of_cancel fun u v h => ConcreteCategory.ext_iff.mp <|
(@cancel_mono _ _ _ _ _ f _ (ofHom u) (ofHom v)).1 <| ConcreteCategory.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem mono_iff_ker_eq_bot : Mono f ↔ f.hom.ker = ⊥ :=
⟨fun _ => ker_eq_bot_of_mono f, fun h =>
ConcreteCategory.mono_of_injective _ <| (MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff f.hom).1 h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mono_iff_injective : Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f :=
Iff.trans (mono_iff_ker_eq_bot f) <| MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff f.hom
namespace SurjectiveOfEpiAuxs
local notation3 "X" => Set.range (· • (f.hom.range : Set B) : B → Set B)
/-- Define `X'` to be the set of all left cosets with an extra point at "infinity".
-/
inductive XWithInfinity
| fromCoset : X → XWithInfinity
| infinity : XWithInfinity
open XWithInfinity Equiv.Perm
local notation "X'" => XWithInfinity f
local notation "∞" => XWithInfinity.infinity
local notation "SX'" => Equiv.Perm X'
instance : SMul B X' where
smul b x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => fromCoset ⟨b • y, by
rw [← y.2.choose_spec, leftCoset_assoc]
let b' : B := y.2.choose
use b * b'⟩
| ∞ => ∞
theorem mul_smul (b b' : B) (x : X') : (b * b') • x = b • b' • x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => by
change fromCoset _ = fromCoset _
simp only [leftCoset_assoc]
| ∞ => rfl
theorem one_smul (x : X') : (1 : B) • x = x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => by
change fromCoset _ = fromCoset _
simp only [one_leftCoset, Subtype.ext_iff_val]
| ∞ => rfl
theorem fromCoset_eq_of_mem_range {b : B} (hb : b ∈ f.hom.range) :
fromCoset ⟨b • ↑f.hom.range, b, rfl⟩ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
congr
nth_rw 2 [show (f.hom.range : Set B) = (1 : B) • f.hom.range from (one_leftCoset _).symm]
rw [leftCoset_eq_iff, mul_one]
exact Subgroup.inv_mem _ hb
example (G : Type) [Group G] (S : Subgroup G) : Set G := S
theorem fromCoset_ne_of_nin_range {b : B} (hb : b ∉ f.hom.range) :
fromCoset ⟨b • ↑f.hom.range, b, rfl⟩ ≠ fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
intro r
simp only [fromCoset.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq] at r
nth_rw 2 [show (f.hom.range : Set B) = (1 : B) • f.hom.range from (one_leftCoset _).symm] at r
rw [leftCoset_eq_iff, mul_one] at r
exact hb (inv_inv b ▸ Subgroup.inv_mem _ r)
instance : DecidableEq X' :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- Let `τ` be the permutation on `X'` exchanging `f.hom.range` and the point at infinity.
-/
noncomputable def tau : SX' :=
Equiv.swap (fromCoset ⟨↑f.hom.range, ⟨1, one_leftCoset _⟩⟩) ∞
local notation "τ" => tau f
theorem τ_apply_infinity : τ ∞ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ :=
Equiv.swap_apply_right _ _
theorem τ_apply_fromCoset : τ (fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩) = ∞ :=
Equiv.swap_apply_left _ _
theorem τ_apply_fromCoset' (x : B) (hx : x ∈ f.hom.range) :
τ (fromCoset ⟨x • ↑f.hom.range, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩) = ∞ :=
(fromCoset_eq_of_mem_range _ hx).symm ▸ τ_apply_fromCoset _
theorem τ_symm_apply_fromCoset :
Equiv.symm τ (fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩) = ∞ := by
rw [tau, Equiv.symm_swap, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
theorem τ_symm_apply_infinity :
Equiv.symm τ ∞ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
rw [tau, Equiv.symm_swap, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
/-- Let `g : B ⟶ S(X')` be defined as such that, for any `β : B`, `g(β)` is the function sending
point at infinity to point at infinity and sending coset `y` to `β • y`.
-/
def g : B →* SX' where
toFun β :=
{ toFun := fun x => β • x
invFun := fun x => β⁻¹ • x
left_inv := fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]
right_inv := fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel, one_smul] }
map_one' := by
ext
simp [one_smul]
map_mul' b1 b2 := by
ext
simp [mul_smul]
local notation "g" => g f
/-- Define `h : B ⟶ S(X')` to be `τ g τ⁻¹`
-/
def h : B →* SX' where
toFun β := ((τ).symm.trans (g β)).trans τ
map_one' := by
ext
simp
map_mul' b1 b2 := by
| ext
simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/EpiMono.lean | 199 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# (Lax) monoidal functors
A lax monoidal functor `F` between monoidal categories `C` and `D`
is a functor between the underlying categories equipped with morphisms
* `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` (called the unit morphism)
* `μ X Y : (F.obj X) ⊗ (F.obj Y) ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)` (called the tensorator, or strength).
satisfying various axioms. This is implemented as a typeclass `F.LaxMonoidal`.
Similarly, we define the typeclass `F.OplaxMonoidal`. For these oplax monoidal functors,
we have similar data `η` and `δ`, but with morphisms in the opposite direction.
A monoidal functor (`F.Monoidal`) is defined here as the combination of `F.LaxMonoidal`
and `F.OplaxMonoidal`, with the additional conditions that `ε`/`η` and `μ`/`δ` are
inverse isomorphisms.
We show that the composition of (lax) monoidal functors gives a (lax) monoidal functor.
See `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation` for monoidal natural transformations.
We show in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_` that lax monoidal functors take monoid objects
to monoid objects.
## References
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFL>.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₁' u₁ u₂ u₃ u₁'
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Functor MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
{D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
{E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] [MonoidalCategory.{v₃} E]
{C' : Type u₁'} [Category.{v₁'} C']
(F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
namespace Functor
-- The direction of `left_unitality` and `right_unitality` as simp lemmas may look strange:
-- remember the rule of thumb that component indices of natural transformations
-- "weigh more" than structural maps.
-- (However by this argument `associativity` is currently stated backwards!)
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories is lax monoidal if it is
equipped with morphisms `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` and `μ X Y : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
@[ext]
class LaxMonoidal where
/-- unit morphism -/
ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)
/-- tensorator -/
μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)
μ'_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ' Y X' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
aesop_cat
μ'_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ' X' Y = μ' X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
aesop_cat
/-- associativity of the tensorator -/
associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
μ' X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ' Y Z ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε' ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε' ≫ μ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
namespace LaxMonoidal
section
variable [F.LaxMonoidal]
/-- the unit morphism of a lax monoidal functor -/
def ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C) := ε'
/-- the tensorator of a lax monoidal functor -/
def μ (X Y : C) : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y) := μ' X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C) :
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ F Y X' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
apply μ'_natural_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_right {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ F X' Y = μ F X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
apply μ'_natural_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma associativity (X Y Z : C) :
μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
apply associativity'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma left_unitality (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
apply left_unitality'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma right_unitality (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
apply right_unitality'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_natural {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ F Y Y' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem left_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X = F.map (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, left_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem right_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) = F.map (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, right_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem associativity_inv (X Y Z : C) :
F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).inv ≫ μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, ← associativity_assoc, ← F.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id,
F.map_id, comp_id]
end
section
variable {F}
/- unit morphism -/
(ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C))
/- tensorator -/
(μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y))
(μ'_natural :
∀ {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y'),
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ' Y Y' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
aesop_cat)
/- associativity of the tensorator -/
(associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(μ' X Y ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj Z)) ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ μ' Y Z) ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat)
/- unitality -/
(left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (ε' ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj X)) ≫ μ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
(right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ ε') ≫ μ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
/--
A constructor for lax monoidal functors whose axioms are described by `tensorHom` instead of
`whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight`.
-/
def ofTensorHom : F.LaxMonoidal where
ε' := ε'
μ' := μ'
μ'_natural_left := fun f X' => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← F.map_id, μ'_natural]
μ'_natural_right := fun X' f => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← F.map_id, μ'_natural]
associativity' := fun X Y Z => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom, associativity']
left_unitality' := fun X => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, left_unitality']
right_unitality' := fun X => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, right_unitality']
lemma ofTensorHom_ε :
letI := (ofTensorHom ε' μ' μ'_natural associativity' left_unitality' right_unitality')
ε F = ε' := rfl
lemma ofTensorHom_μ :
letI := (ofTensorHom ε' μ' μ'_natural associativity' left_unitality' right_unitality')
μ F = μ' := rfl
end
instance id : (𝟭 C).LaxMonoidal where
ε' := 𝟙 _
μ' _ _ := 𝟙 _
@[simp]
lemma id_ε : ε (𝟭 C) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma id_μ (X Y : C) : μ (𝟭 C) X Y = 𝟙 _ := rfl
section
variable [F.LaxMonoidal] [G.LaxMonoidal]
instance comp : (F ⋙ G).LaxMonoidal where
ε' := ε G ≫ G.map (ε F)
μ' X Y := μ G _ _ ≫ G.map (μ F X Y)
μ'_natural_left _ _ := by
simp_rw [comp_obj, F.comp_map, μ_natural_left_assoc, assoc, ← G.map_comp, μ_natural_left]
μ'_natural_right _ _ := by
simp_rw [comp_obj, F.comp_map, μ_natural_right_assoc, assoc, ← G.map_comp, μ_natural_right]
associativity' _ _ _ := by
dsimp
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc, ← associativity_assoc, ← G.map_comp, associativity]
@[simp]
lemma comp_ε : ε (F ⋙ G) = ε G ≫ G.map (ε F) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_μ (X Y : C) : μ (F ⋙ G) X Y = μ G _ _ ≫ G.map (μ F X Y) := rfl
end
end LaxMonoidal
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories is oplax monoidal if it is
equipped with morphisms `η : F.obj (𝟙_ C) ⟶ 𝟙 _D` and `δ X Y : F.obj (X ⊗ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
@[ext]
class OplaxMonoidal where
/-- counit morphism -/
η' : F.obj (𝟙_ C) ⟶ 𝟙_ D
/-- cotensorator -/
δ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj (X ⊗ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y
δ'_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
δ' X X' ≫ F.map f ▷ F.obj X' = F.map (f ▷ X') ≫ δ' Y X' := by
aesop_cat
δ'_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
δ' X' X ≫ F.obj X' ◁ F.map f = F.map (X' ◁ f) ≫ δ' X' Y := by
aesop_cat
/-- associativity of the tensorator -/
oplax_associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
δ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ δ' X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ (α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom =
F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ δ' X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.obj X ◁ δ' Y Z := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
oplax_left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).inv = F.map (λ_ X).inv ≫ δ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ η' ▷ F.obj X := by
aesop_cat
oplax_right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv = F.map (ρ_ X).inv ≫ δ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.obj X ◁ η' := by
aesop_cat
namespace OplaxMonoidal
section
variable [F.OplaxMonoidal]
/-- the counit morphism of a lax monoidal functor -/
def η : F.obj (𝟙_ C) ⟶ 𝟙_ D := η'
/-- the cotensorator of an oplax monoidal functor -/
def δ (X Y : C) : F.obj (X ⊗ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y := δ' X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma δ_natural_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C) :
δ F X X' ≫ F.map f ▷ F.obj X' = F.map (f ▷ X') ≫ δ F Y X' := by
apply δ'_natural_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma δ_natural_right {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
δ F X' X ≫ F.obj X' ◁ F.map f = F.map (X' ◁ f) ≫ δ F X' Y := by
apply δ'_natural_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma associativity (X Y Z : C) :
δ F (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ δ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ (α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom =
F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ δ F X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.obj X ◁ δ F Y Z := by
apply oplax_associativity'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma left_unitality (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv = F.map (λ_ X).inv ≫ δ F (𝟙_ C) X ≫ η F ▷ F.obj X := by
apply oplax_left_unitality'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma right_unitality (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv = F.map (ρ_ X).inv ≫ δ F X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.obj X ◁ η F := by
apply oplax_right_unitality'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_natural {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
δ F X X' ≫ (F.map f ⊗ F.map g) = F.map (f ⊗ g) ≫ δ F Y Y' := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem left_unitality_hom (X : C) :
δ F (𝟙_ C) X ≫ η F ▷ F.obj X ≫ (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Iso.eq_comp_inv, left_unitality, ← Category.assoc,
← F.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem right_unitality_hom (X : C) :
δ F X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.obj X ◁ η F ≫ (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Iso.eq_comp_inv, right_unitality, ← Category.assoc,
← F.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem associativity_inv (X Y Z : C) :
δ F X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.obj X ◁ δ F Y Z ≫ (α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).inv =
F.map (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ δ F (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ δ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z := by
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, associativity,
← Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, F.map_id, id_comp]
end
instance id : (𝟭 C).OplaxMonoidal where
η' := 𝟙 _
δ' _ _ := 𝟙 _
@[simp]
lemma id_η : η (𝟭 C) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma id_δ (X Y : C) : δ (𝟭 C) X Y = 𝟙 _ := rfl
section
variable [F.OplaxMonoidal] [G.OplaxMonoidal]
instance comp : (F ⋙ G).OplaxMonoidal where
η' := G.map (η F) ≫ η G
δ' X Y := G.map (δ F X Y) ≫ δ G _ _
δ'_natural_left {X Y} f X' := by
dsimp
rw [assoc, δ_natural_left, ← G.map_comp_assoc, δ_natural_left, map_comp, assoc]
δ'_natural_right _ _ := by
dsimp
rw [assoc, δ_natural_right, ← G.map_comp_assoc, δ_natural_right, map_comp, assoc]
oplax_associativity' X Y Z := by
dsimp
rw [comp_whiskerRight, assoc, assoc, assoc, δ_natural_left_assoc, associativity,
← G.map_comp_assoc, ← G.map_comp_assoc, assoc, associativity, map_comp, map_comp,
assoc, assoc, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, δ_natural_right_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma comp_η : η (F ⋙ G) = G.map (η F) ≫ η G := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_δ (X Y : C) : δ (F ⋙ G) X Y = G.map (δ F X Y) ≫ δ G _ _ := rfl
end
end OplaxMonoidal
open LaxMonoidal OplaxMonoidal
/-- A functor between monoidal categories is monoidal if it is lax and oplax monoidals,
and both data give inverse isomorphisms. -/
@[ext]
class Monoidal extends F.LaxMonoidal, F.OplaxMonoidal where
ε_η : ε F ≫ η F = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
η_ε : η F ≫ ε F = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
μ_δ (X Y : C) : μ F X Y ≫ δ F X Y = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
δ_μ (X Y : C) : δ F X Y ≫ μ F X Y = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
namespace Monoidal
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ε_η η_ε μ_δ δ_μ
| section
variable [F.Monoidal]
/-- The isomorphism `𝟙_ D ≅ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` when `F` is a monoidal functor. -/
@[simps]
def εIso : 𝟙_ D ≅ F.obj (𝟙_ C) where
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Functor.lean | 390 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Reid Barton, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Opens
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.KanExtension.Adjunction
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Presheaves on a topological space
We define `TopCat.Presheaf C X` simply as `(TopologicalSpace.Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C`,
and inherit the category structure with natural transformations as morphisms.
We define
* Given `{X Y : TopCat.{w}}` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we define
`TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward C f : X.Presheaf C ⥤ Y.Presheaf C`,
with notation `f _* ℱ` for `ℱ : X.Presheaf C`.
and for `ℱ : X.Presheaf C` provide the natural isomorphisms
* `TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id : (𝟙 X) _* ℱ ≅ ℱ`
* `TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.comp : (f ≫ g) _* ℱ ≅ g _* (f _* ℱ)`
along with their `@[simp]` lemmas.
We also define the functors `pullback C f : Y.Presheaf C ⥤ X.Presheaf c`,
and provide their adjunction at
`TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardPullbackAdjunction`.
-/
universe w v u
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
namespace TopCat
/-- The category of `C`-valued presheaves on a (bundled) topological space `X`. -/
def Presheaf (X : TopCat.{w}) : Type max u v w :=
(Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C
instance (X : TopCat.{w}) : Category (Presheaf.{w, v, u} C X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Category ((Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C : Type max u v w))
variable {C}
namespace Presheaf
@[simp] theorem comp_app {X : TopCat} {U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} {P Q R : Presheaf C X}
(f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(f ≫ g).app U = f.app U ≫ g.app U := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {X : TopCat} {P Q : Presheaf C X} {f g : P ⟶ Q}
(w : ∀ U : Opens X, f.app (op U) = g.app (op U)) :
f = g := by
apply NatTrans.ext
ext U
induction U with | _ U => ?_
apply w
/-- attribute `sheaf_restrict` to mark lemmas related to restricting sheaves -/
macro "sheaf_restrict" : attr =>
`(attr|aesop safe 50 apply (rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute [sheaf_restrict] bot_le le_top le_refl inf_le_left inf_le_right
le_sup_left le_sup_right
/-- `restrict_tac` solves relations among subsets (copied from `aesop cat`) -/
macro (name := restrict_tac) "restrict_tac" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | assumption |
aesop $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
/-- `restrict_tac?` passes along `Try this` from `aesop` -/
macro (name := restrict_tac?) "restrict_tac?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false
maxRuleApplications := 300 })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute[aesop 10% (rule_sets := [Restrict])] le_trans
attribute[aesop safe destruct (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Eq.trans_le
attribute[aesop safe -50 (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Aesop.BuiltinRules.assumption
example {X} [CompleteLattice X] (v : Nat → X) (w x y z : X) (e : v 0 = v 1) (_ : v 1 = v 2)
(h₀ : v 1 ≤ x) (_ : x ≤ z ⊓ w) (h₂ : x ≤ y ⊓ z) : v 0 ≤ y := by
restrict_tac
variable {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type*}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)] [ConcreteCategory C FC]
/-- The restriction of a section along an inclusion of open sets.
For `x : F.obj (op V)`, we provide the notation `x |_ₕ i` (`h` stands for `hom`) for `i : U ⟶ V`,
and the notation `x |_ₗ U ⟪i⟫` (`l` stands for `le`) for `i : U ≤ V`.
-/
def restrict {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) {U : Opens X} (h : U ⟶ V) : ToType (F.obj (op U)) :=
F.map h.op x
/-- restriction of a section along an inclusion -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ₕ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrict
/-- restriction of a section along a subset relation -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation:80 x " |_ₗ " U " ⟪" e "⟫ " =>
@TopCat.Presheaf.restrict _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ x U (@homOfLE (Opens _) _ U _ e)
open AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The restriction of a section along an inclusion of open sets.
For `x : F.obj (op V)`, we provide the notation `x |_ U`, where the proof `U ≤ V` is inferred by
the tactic `Top.presheaf.restrict_tac'` -/
abbrev restrictOpen {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) (U : Opens X)
(e : U ≤ V := by restrict_tac) :
ToType (F.obj (op U)) :=
x |_ₗ U ⟪e⟫
/-- restriction of a section to open subset -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen
theorem restrict_restrict
{F : X.Presheaf C} {U V W : Opens X} (e₁ : U ≤ V) (e₂ : V ≤ W) (x : ToType (F.obj (op W))) :
x |_ V |_ U = x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
theorem map_restrict
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (e : F ⟶ G) {U V : Opens X} (h : U ≤ V) (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) :
e.app _ (x |_ U) = e.app _ x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (C)
/-- The pushforward functor. -/
@[simps!]
def pushforward {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : X.Presheaf C ⥤ Y.Presheaf C :=
(whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj (Opens.map f).op
/-- push forward of a presheaf -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation f:80 " _* " P:81 =>
Prefunctor.obj (Functor.toPrefunctor (TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward _ f)) P
@[simp]
theorem pushforward_map_app' {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ℱ 𝒢 : X.Presheaf C} (α : ℱ ⟶ 𝒢)
{U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ} : ((pushforward C f).map α).app U = α.app (op <| (Opens.map f).obj U.unop) :=
rfl
lemma id_pushforward (X : TopCat.{w}) : pushforward C (𝟙 X) = 𝟭 (X.Presheaf C) := rfl
variable {C}
namespace Pushforward
/-- The natural isomorphism between the pushforward of a presheaf along the identity continuous map
and the original presheaf. -/
def id {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) : 𝟙 X _* ℱ ≅ ℱ := Iso.refl _
@[simp]
theorem id_hom_app {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) : (id ℱ).hom.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_inv_app {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(id ℱ).inv.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
theorem id_eq {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) : 𝟙 X _* ℱ = ℱ := rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between
the pushforward of a presheaf along the composition of two continuous maps and
the corresponding pushforward of a pushforward. -/
def comp {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
(f ≫ g) _* ℱ ≅ g _* (f _* ℱ) := Iso.refl _
theorem comp_eq {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
(f ≫ g) _* ℱ = g _* (f _* ℱ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom_app {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(comp f g ℱ).hom.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_inv_app {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(comp f g ℱ).inv.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
end Pushforward
/--
An equality of continuous maps induces a natural isomorphism between the pushforwards of a presheaf
along those maps.
-/
def pushforwardEq {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ ≅ g _* ℱ :=
isoWhiskerRight (NatIso.op (Opens.mapIso f g h).symm) ℱ
theorem pushforward_eq' {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ = g _* ℱ := by rw [h]
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardEq_hom_app {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y}
(h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(pushforwardEq h ℱ).hom.app U = ℱ.map (eqToHom (by aesop_cat)) := by
simp [pushforwardEq]
variable (C)
section Iso
/-- A homeomorphism of spaces gives an equivalence of categories of presheaves. -/
@[simps!]
def presheafEquivOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H : X ≅ Y) : X.Presheaf C ≌ Y.Presheaf C :=
Equivalence.congrLeft (Opens.mapMapIso H).symm.op
variable {C}
/-- If `H : X ≅ Y` is a homeomorphism,
then given an `H _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢`, we may obtain an `ℱ ⟶ H ⁻¹ _* 𝒢`.
-/
def toPushforwardOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : X.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : Y.Presheaf C}
(α : H.hom _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢) : ℱ ⟶ H.inv _* 𝒢 :=
(presheafEquivOfIso _ H).toAdjunction.homEquiv ℱ 𝒢 α
@[simp]
theorem toPushforwardOfIso_app {X Y : TopCat} (H₁ : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : X.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : Y.Presheaf C}
(H₂ : H₁.hom _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢) (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) :
(toPushforwardOfIso H₁ H₂).app U =
ℱ.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_preimage])) ≫
H₂.app (op ((Opens.map H₁.inv).obj (unop U))) := by
simp [toPushforwardOfIso, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit]
/-- If `H : X ≅ Y` is a homeomorphism,
then given an `H _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢`, we may obtain an `ℱ ⟶ H ⁻¹ _* 𝒢`.
-/
def pushforwardToOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H₁ : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : Y.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : X.Presheaf C}
(H₂ : ℱ ⟶ H₁.hom _* 𝒢) : H₁.inv _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢 :=
((presheafEquivOfIso _ H₁.symm).toAdjunction.homEquiv ℱ 𝒢).symm H₂
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardToOfIso_app {X Y : TopCat} (H₁ : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : Y.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : X.Presheaf C}
(H₂ : ℱ ⟶ H₁.hom _* 𝒢) (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) :
(pushforwardToOfIso H₁ H₂).app U =
H₂.app (op ((Opens.map H₁.inv).obj (unop U))) ≫
𝒢.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_preimage])) := by
simp [pushforwardToOfIso, Equivalence.toAdjunction, Adjunction.homEquiv_counit]
end Iso
variable [HasColimits C]
noncomputable section
/-- Pullback a presheaf on `Y` along a continuous map `f : X ⟶ Y`, obtaining a presheaf
on `X`. -/
def pullback {X Y : TopCat.{v}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Y.Presheaf C ⥤ X.Presheaf C :=
(Opens.map f).op.lan
/-- The pullback and pushforward along a continuous map are adjoint to each other. -/
def pushforwardPullbackAdjunction {X Y : TopCat.{v}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
pullback C f ⊣ pushforward C f :=
Functor.lanAdjunction _ _
/-- Pulling back along a homeomorphism is the same as pushing forward along its inverse. -/
def pullbackHomIsoPushforwardInv {X Y : TopCat.{v}} (H : X ≅ Y) :
pullback C H.hom ≅ pushforward C H.inv :=
Adjunction.leftAdjointUniq (pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C H.hom)
(presheafEquivOfIso C H.symm).toAdjunction
/-- Pulling back along the inverse of a homeomorphism is the same as pushing forward along it. -/
def pullbackInvIsoPushforwardHom {X Y : TopCat.{v}} (H : X ≅ Y) :
pullback C H.inv ≅ pushforward C H.hom :=
Adjunction.leftAdjointUniq (pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C H.inv)
(presheafEquivOfIso C H).toAdjunction
variable {C}
/-- If `f '' U` is open, then `f⁻¹ℱ U ≅ ℱ (f '' U)`. -/
def pullbackObjObjOfImageOpen {X Y : TopCat.{v}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : Y.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X)
(H : IsOpen (f '' SetLike.coe U)) : ((pullback C f).obj ℱ).obj (op U) ≅ ℱ.obj (op ⟨_, H⟩) := by
let x : CostructuredArrow (Opens.map f).op (op U) := CostructuredArrow.mk
(@homOfLE _ _ _ ((Opens.map f).obj ⟨_, H⟩) (Set.image_preimage.le_u_l _)).op
have hx : IsTerminal x :=
{ lift := fun s ↦ by
fapply CostructuredArrow.homMk
| · change op (unop _) ⟶ op (⟨_, H⟩ : Opens _)
refine (homOfLE ?_).op
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Presheaf.lean | 295 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.LocallyConnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
/-!
# Locally constant functions
This file sets up the theory of locally constant function from a topological space to a type.
## Main definitions and constructions
* `IsLocallyConstant f` : a map `f : X → Y` where `X` is a topological space is locally
constant if every set in `Y` has an open preimage.
* `LocallyConstant X Y` : the type of locally constant maps from `X` to `Y`
* `LocallyConstant.map` : push-forward of locally constant maps
* `LocallyConstant.comap` : pull-back of locally constant maps
-/
variable {X Y Z α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology
/-- A function between topological spaces is locally constant if the preimage of any set is open. -/
def IsLocallyConstant (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
∀ s : Set Y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s)
namespace IsLocallyConstant
open List in
protected theorem tfae (f : X → Y) :
TFAE [IsLocallyConstant f,
∀ x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' = f x,
∀ x, IsOpen { x' | f x' = f x },
∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {y}),
∀ x, ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ ∀ x' ∈ U, f x' = f x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4 := fun h y => h {y}
tfae_have 4 → 3 := fun h x => h (f x)
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h x => IsOpen.mem_nhds (h x) rfl
tfae_have 2 → 5
| h, x => by
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 (h x) with ⟨U, eq, hU, hx⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, hx, eq⟩
tfae_have 5 → 1
| h, s => by
refine isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_
rcases h x with ⟨U, hU, hxU, eq⟩
exact ⟨U, fun x' hx' => mem_preimage.2 <| (eq x' hx').symm ▸ hx, hU, hxU⟩
tfae_finish
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (f : X → Y) : IsLocallyConstant f := fun _ =>
isOpen_discrete _
theorem isOpen_fiber {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (y : Y) : IsOpen { x | f x = y } :=
hf {y}
theorem isClosed_fiber {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (y : Y) : IsClosed { x | f x = y } :=
⟨hf {y}ᶜ⟩
theorem isClopen_fiber {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (y : Y) : IsClopen { x | f x = y } :=
⟨isClosed_fiber hf _, isOpen_fiber hf _⟩
theorem iff_exists_open (f : X → Y) :
IsLocallyConstant f ↔ ∀ x, ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ ∀ x' ∈ U, f x' = f x :=
(IsLocallyConstant.tfae f).out 0 4
theorem iff_eventually_eq (f : X → Y) : IsLocallyConstant f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y = f x :=
(IsLocallyConstant.tfae f).out 0 1
theorem exists_open {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (x : X) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ ∀ x' ∈ U, f x' = f x :=
(iff_exists_open f).1 hf x
protected theorem eventually_eq {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y = f x :=
(iff_eventually_eq f).1 hf x
theorem iff_isOpen_fiber_apply {f : X → Y} : IsLocallyConstant f ↔ ∀ x, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {f x}) :=
(IsLocallyConstant.tfae f).out 0 2
theorem iff_isOpen_fiber {f : X → Y} : IsLocallyConstant f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {y}) :=
(IsLocallyConstant.tfae f).out 0 3
protected theorem continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) :
Continuous f :=
⟨fun _ _ => hf _⟩
theorem iff_continuous {_ : TopologicalSpace Y} [DiscreteTopology Y] (f : X → Y) :
IsLocallyConstant f ↔ Continuous f :=
⟨IsLocallyConstant.continuous, fun h s => h.isOpen_preimage s (isOpen_discrete _)⟩
theorem of_constant (f : X → Y) (h : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : IsLocallyConstant f :=
(iff_eventually_eq f).2 fun _ => Eventually.of_forall fun _ => h _ _
protected theorem const (y : Y) : IsLocallyConstant (Function.const X y) :=
of_constant _ fun _ _ => rfl
protected theorem comp {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (g : Y → Z) :
IsLocallyConstant (g ∘ f) := fun s => by
rw [Set.preimage_comp]
exact hf _
theorem prodMk {Y'} {f : X → Y} {f' : X → Y'} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f)
(hf' : IsLocallyConstant f') : IsLocallyConstant fun x => (f x, f' x) :=
(iff_eventually_eq _).2 fun x =>
(hf.eventually_eq x).mp <| (hf'.eventually_eq x).mono fun _ hf' hf => Prod.ext hf hf'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias prod_mk := prodMk
theorem comp₂ {Y₁ Y₂ Z : Type*} {f : X → Y₁} {g : X → Y₂} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f)
(hg : IsLocallyConstant g) (h : Y₁ → Y₂ → Z) : IsLocallyConstant fun x => h (f x) (g x) :=
(hf.prodMk hg).comp fun x : Y₁ × Y₂ => h x.1 x.2
theorem comp_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : Y → Z} {f : X → Y} (hg : IsLocallyConstant g)
(hf : Continuous f) : IsLocallyConstant (g ∘ f) := fun s => by
rw [Set.preimage_comp]
exact hf.isOpen_preimage _ (hg _)
/-- A locally constant function is constant on any preconnected set. -/
theorem apply_eq_of_isPreconnected {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) {s : Set X}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {x y : X} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y := by
let U := f ⁻¹' {f y}
suffices x ∉ Uᶜ from Classical.not_not.1 this
intro hxV
specialize hs U Uᶜ (hf {f y}) (hf {f y}ᶜ) _ ⟨y, ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩ ⟨x, ⟨hx, hxV⟩⟩
· simp only [union_compl_self, subset_univ]
· simp only [inter_empty, Set.not_nonempty_empty, inter_compl_self] at hs
theorem apply_eq_of_preconnectedSpace [PreconnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f)
(x y : X) : f x = f y :=
hf.apply_eq_of_isPreconnected isPreconnected_univ trivial trivial
theorem eq_const [PreconnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (x : X) :
f = Function.const X (f x) :=
funext fun y => hf.apply_eq_of_preconnectedSpace y x
theorem exists_eq_const [PreconnectedSpace X] [Nonempty Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) :
∃ y, f = Function.const X y := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty X with h | h
· exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary Y, funext <| h.elim⟩
· exact ⟨f (Classical.arbitrary X), hf.eq_const _⟩
theorem iff_is_const [PreconnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} : IsLocallyConstant f ↔ ∀ x y, f x = f y :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h.apply_eq_of_isPreconnected isPreconnected_univ trivial trivial, of_constant _⟩
theorem range_finite [CompactSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) :
(Set.range f).Finite := by
letI : TopologicalSpace Y := ⊥; haveI := discreteTopology_bot Y
exact (isCompact_range hf.continuous).finite_of_discrete
@[to_additive]
theorem one [One Y] : IsLocallyConstant (1 : X → Y) := IsLocallyConstant.const 1
@[to_additive]
theorem inv [Inv Y] ⦃f : X → Y⦄ (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) : IsLocallyConstant f⁻¹ :=
hf.comp fun x => x⁻¹
@[to_additive]
theorem mul [Mul Y] ⦃f g : X → Y⦄ (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (hg : IsLocallyConstant g) :
IsLocallyConstant (f * g) :=
hf.comp₂ hg (· * ·)
@[to_additive]
theorem div [Div Y] ⦃f g : X → Y⦄ (hf : IsLocallyConstant f) (hg : IsLocallyConstant g) :
IsLocallyConstant (f / g) :=
hf.comp₂ hg (· / ·)
/-- If a composition of a function `f` followed by an injection `g` is locally
constant, then the locally constant property descends to `f`. -/
theorem desc {α β : Type*} (f : X → α) (g : α → β) (h : IsLocallyConstant (g ∘ f))
(inj : Function.Injective g) : IsLocallyConstant f := fun s => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s inj, preimage_preimage]
exact h (g '' s)
theorem of_constant_on_connected_components [LocallyConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(h : ∀ x, ∀ y ∈ connectedComponent x, f y = f x) : IsLocallyConstant f :=
(iff_exists_open _).2 fun x =>
⟨connectedComponent x, isOpen_connectedComponent, mem_connectedComponent, h x⟩
theorem of_constant_on_connected_clopens [LocallyConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(h : ∀ U : Set X, IsConnected U → IsClopen U → ∀ x ∈ U, ∀ y ∈ U, f y = f x) :
IsLocallyConstant f :=
of_constant_on_connected_components fun x =>
h (connectedComponent x) isConnected_connectedComponent isClopen_connectedComponent x
mem_connectedComponent
theorem of_constant_on_preconnected_clopens [LocallyConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(h : ∀ U : Set X, IsPreconnected U → IsClopen U → ∀ x ∈ U, ∀ y ∈ U, f y = f x) :
IsLocallyConstant f :=
of_constant_on_connected_clopens fun U hU ↦ h U hU.isPreconnected
end IsLocallyConstant
/-- A (bundled) locally constant function from a topological space `X` to a type `Y`. -/
structure LocallyConstant (X Y : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] where
/-- The underlying function. -/
protected toFun : X → Y
/-- The map is locally constant. -/
protected isLocallyConstant : IsLocallyConstant toFun
namespace LocallyConstant
instance [Inhabited Y] : Inhabited (LocallyConstant X Y) :=
⟨⟨_, IsLocallyConstant.const default⟩⟩
instance : FunLike (LocallyConstant X Y) X Y where
coe := LocallyConstant.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ _; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projections]. -/
def Simps.apply (f : LocallyConstant X Y) : X → Y := f
initialize_simps_projections LocallyConstant (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : LocallyConstant X Y) : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : X → Y) (h) : ⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : LocallyConstant X Y) = f :=
rfl
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : LocallyConstant X Y} (h : f = g) (x : X) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
protected theorem congr_arg (f : LocallyConstant X Y) {x y : X} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (LocallyConstant X Y) (X → Y) (↑) := fun _ _ =>
DFunLike.ext'
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : LocallyConstant X Y} : (f : X → Y) = g ↔ f = g :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : LocallyConstant X Y⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
section CodomainTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace Y] (f : LocallyConstant X Y)
protected theorem continuous : Continuous f :=
f.isLocallyConstant.continuous
/-- We can turn a locally-constant function into a bundled `ContinuousMap`. -/
@[coe] def toContinuousMap : C(X, Y) :=
⟨f, f.continuous⟩
/-- As a shorthand, `LocallyConstant.toContinuousMap` is available as a coercion -/
instance : Coe (LocallyConstant X Y) C(X, Y) := ⟨toContinuousMap⟩
-- Porting note: became a syntactic `rfl`
@[simp] theorem coe_continuousMap : ((f : C(X, Y)) : X → Y) = (f : X → Y) := rfl
theorem toContinuousMap_injective :
Function.Injective (toContinuousMap : LocallyConstant X Y → C(X, Y)) := fun _ _ h =>
ext (ContinuousMap.congr_fun h)
end CodomainTopologicalSpace
/-- The constant locally constant function on `X` with value `y : Y`. -/
def const (X : Type*) {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (y : Y) : LocallyConstant X Y :=
⟨Function.const X y, IsLocallyConstant.const _⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (y : Y) : (const X y : X → Y) = Function.const X y :=
rfl
/-- Evaluation/projection as a locally constant function. -/
@[simps]
def eval {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] (i : ι) [DiscreteTopology (X i)] :
LocallyConstant (Π i, X i) (X i) where
toFun := fun f ↦ f i
isLocallyConstant := (IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous _).mpr <| continuous_apply i
/-- The locally constant function to `Fin 2` associated to a clopen set. -/
def ofIsClopen {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {U : Set X} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ U)]
(hU : IsClopen U) : LocallyConstant X (Fin 2) where
toFun x := if x ∈ U then 0 else 1
isLocallyConstant := by
refine IsLocallyConstant.iff_isOpen_fiber.2 <| Fin.forall_fin_two.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· convert hU.2 using 1
ext
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, Fin.one_eq_zero_iff, mem_preimage, ite_eq_left_iff,
Nat.succ_succ_ne_one]
tauto
· rw [← isClosed_compl_iff]
convert hU.1
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem ofIsClopen_fiber_zero {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {U : Set X} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ U)]
(hU : IsClopen U) : ofIsClopen hU ⁻¹' ({0} : Set (Fin 2)) = U := by
ext
simp only [ofIsClopen, mem_singleton_iff, Fin.one_eq_zero_iff, coe_mk, mem_preimage,
ite_eq_left_iff, Nat.succ_succ_ne_one]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem ofIsClopen_fiber_one {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {U : Set X} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ U)]
(hU : IsClopen U) : ofIsClopen hU ⁻¹' ({1} : Set (Fin 2)) = Uᶜ := by
ext
simp only [ofIsClopen, mem_singleton_iff, coe_mk, Fin.zero_eq_one_iff, mem_preimage,
ite_eq_right_iff, mem_compl_iff, Nat.succ_succ_ne_one]
theorem locallyConstant_eq_of_fiber_zero_eq {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
(f g : LocallyConstant X (Fin 2)) (h : f ⁻¹' ({0} : Set (Fin 2)) = g ⁻¹' {0}) : f = g := by
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage] at h
ext1 x
exact Fin.fin_two_eq_of_eq_zero_iff (h x)
theorem range_finite [CompactSpace X] (f : LocallyConstant X Y) : (Set.range f).Finite :=
f.isLocallyConstant.range_finite
theorem apply_eq_of_isPreconnected (f : LocallyConstant X Y) {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
{x y : X} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y :=
f.isLocallyConstant.apply_eq_of_isPreconnected hs hx hy
theorem apply_eq_of_preconnectedSpace [PreconnectedSpace X] (f : LocallyConstant X Y) (x y : X) :
f x = f y :=
f.isLocallyConstant.apply_eq_of_isPreconnected isPreconnected_univ trivial trivial
theorem eq_const [PreconnectedSpace X] (f : LocallyConstant X Y) (x : X) : f = const X (f x) :=
ext fun _ => apply_eq_of_preconnectedSpace f _ _
theorem exists_eq_const [PreconnectedSpace X] [Nonempty Y] (f : LocallyConstant X Y) :
∃ y, f = const X y := by
rcases Classical.em (Nonempty X) with (⟨⟨x⟩⟩ | hX)
· exact ⟨f x, f.eq_const x⟩
· exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary Y, ext fun x => (hX ⟨x⟩).elim⟩
/-- Push forward of locally constant maps under any map, by post-composition. -/
def map (f : Y → Z) (g : LocallyConstant X Y) : LocallyConstant X Z :=
⟨f ∘ g, g.isLocallyConstant.comp f⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (f : Y → Z) (g : LocallyConstant X Y) : ⇑(map f g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : @map X Y Y _ id = id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : Type*} (g : Y₂ → Y₃) (f : Y₁ → Y₂) :
@map X _ _ _ g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := rfl
/-- Given a locally constant function to `α → β`, construct a family of locally constant
functions with values in β indexed by α. -/
def flip {X α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (f : LocallyConstant X (α → β)) (a : α) :
LocallyConstant X β :=
f.map fun f => f a
/-- If α is finite, this constructs a locally constant function to `α → β` given a
family of locally constant functions with values in β indexed by α. -/
def unflip {X α β : Type*} [Finite α] [TopologicalSpace X] (f : α → LocallyConstant X β) :
LocallyConstant X (α → β) where
toFun x a := f a x
| isLocallyConstant := IsLocallyConstant.iff_isOpen_fiber.2 fun g => by
have : (fun (x : X) (a : α) => f a x) ⁻¹' {g} = ⋂ a : α, f a ⁻¹' {g a} := by
ext; simp [funext_iff]
rw [this]
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite fun a => (f a).isLocallyConstant _
| Mathlib/Topology/LocallyConstant/Basic.lean | 371 | 375 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Geißer, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DiophantineApproximation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
/-!
# Pell's Equation
*Pell's Equation* is the equation $x^2 - d y^2 = 1$, where $d$ is a positive integer
that is not a square, and one is interested in solutions in integers $x$ and $y$.
In this file, we aim at providing all of the essential theory of Pell's Equation for general $d$
(as opposed to the contents of `NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic`, which is specific to the case
$d = a^2 - 1$ for some $a > 1$).
We begin by defining a type `Pell.Solution₁ d` for solutions of the equation,
show that it has a natural structure as an abelian group, and prove some basic
properties.
We then prove the following
**Theorem.** Let $d$ be a positive integer that is not a square. Then the equation
$x^2 - d y^2 = 1$ has a nontrivial (i.e., with $y \ne 0$) solution in integers.
See `Pell.exists_of_not_isSquare` and `Pell.Solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare`.
We then define the *fundamental solution* to be the solution
with smallest $x$ among all solutions satisfying $x > 1$ and $y > 0$.
We show that every solution is a power (in the sense of the group structure mentioned above)
of the fundamental solution up to a (common) sign,
see `Pell.IsFundamental.eq_zpow_or_neg_zpow`, and that a (positive) solution has this property
if and only if it is fundamental, see `Pell.pos_generator_iff_fundamental`.
## References
* [K. Ireland, M. Rosen, *A classical introduction to modern number theory*
(Section 17.5)][IrelandRosen1990]
## Tags
Pell's equation
## TODO
* Extend to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = -1` and further generalizations.
* Connect solutions to the continued fraction expansion of `√d`.
-/
namespace Pell
/-!
### Group structure of the solution set
We define a structure of a commutative multiplicative group with distributive negation
on the set of all solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
The type of such solutions is `Pell.Solution₁ d`. It corresponds to a pair of integers `x` and `y`
and a proof that `(x, y)` is indeed a solution.
The multiplication is given by `(x, y) * (x', y') = (x*y' + d*y*y', x*y' + y*x')`.
This is obtained by mapping `(x, y)` to `x + y*√d` and multiplying the results.
In fact, we define `Pell.Solution₁ d` to be `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))` and transport
the "commutative group with distributive negation" structure from `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))`.
We then set up an API for `Pell.Solution₁ d`.
-/
open CharZero Zsqrtd
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm one (i.e., `a.re^2 - d*a.im^2 = 1`) if and only if
it is contained in the submonoid of unitary elements.
TODO: merge this result with `Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary`. -/
theorem is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} :
a.re ^ 2 - d * a.im ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
| rw [← norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary, norm_def, sq, sq, ← mul_assoc]
-- We use `solution₁ d` to allow for a more general structure `solution d m` that
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Pell.lean | 83 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Tropical.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Tropicalization of finitary operations
This file provides the "big-op" or notation-based finitary operations on tropicalized types.
This allows easy conversion between sums to Infs and prods to sums. Results here are important
for expressing that evaluation of tropical polynomials are the minimum over a finite piecewise
collection of linear functions.
## Main declarations
* `untrop_sum`
## Implementation notes
No concrete (semi)ring is used here, only ones with inferable order/lattice structure, to support
`Real`, `Rat`, `EReal`, and others (`ERat` is not yet defined).
Minima over `List α` are defined as producing a value in `WithTop α` so proofs about lists do not
directly transfer to minima over multisets or finsets.
-/
variable {R S : Type*}
open Tropical Finset
theorem List.trop_sum [AddMonoid R] (l : List R) : trop l.sum = List.prod (l.map trop) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simp [← IH]
theorem Multiset.trop_sum [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Multiset R) :
trop s.sum = Multiset.prod (s.map trop) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by simpa using List.trop_sum)
theorem trop_sum [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Finset S) (f : S → R) :
trop (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, trop (f i) := by
convert Multiset.trop_sum (s.val.map f)
simp only [Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
theorem List.untrop_prod [AddMonoid R] (l : List (Tropical R)) :
untrop l.prod = List.sum (l.map untrop) := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simp [← IH]
|
theorem Multiset.untrop_prod [AddCommMonoid R] (s : Multiset (Tropical R)) :
untrop s.prod = Multiset.sum (s.map untrop) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by simpa using List.untrop_prod)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Tropical/BigOperators.lean | 58 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl (p q : Submodule R E) (h : IsCompl p q)`:
the projection of a module `E` to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`;
it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `Submodule.isComplEquivProj p`: equivalence between submodules `q`
such that `IsCompl p q` and projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by rw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotientEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (E ⧸ p) ≃ₗ[R] q :=
LinearEquiv.symm <|
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.mkQ.comp q.subtype)
⟨by rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_comp, ker_mkQ, disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot.1 h.symm.disjoint], by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_comp, range_subtype, map_mkQ_eq_top, h.sup_eq_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
-- Porting note: type ascriptions needed on the RHS
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (Quotient.mk x : E ⧸ p) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h (Quotient.mk x) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E ⧸ p) :
(Quotient.mk (quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h x) : E ⧸ p) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_apply x
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (p × q) ≃ₗ[R] E := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype)
constructor
· rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range, ker_subtype, ker_subtype, prod_bot]
rw [range_subtype, range_subtype]
exact h.1
· rw [← range_eq_top, ← sup_eq_range, h.sup_eq_top]
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h : p × q →ₗ[R] E) = p.subtype.coprod q.subtype := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p × q) :
prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h x = x.1 + x.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (x, 0) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (0, x) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).1 = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_left _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).2 = 0 ↔ x ∈ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
LinearEquiv.prodComm R q p ≪≫ₗ prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h = prodEquivOfIsCompl q p h.symm :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => add_comm _ _
/-- Projection to a submodule along a complement.
See also `LinearMap.linearProjOfIsCompl`. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : E →ₗ[R] p :=
LinearMap.fst R p q ∘ₗ ↑(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = x := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_range (h : IsCompl p q) : range (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_of_proj (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_surjective (h : IsCompl p q) :
Function.Surjective (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) :=
range_eq_top.mp (linearProjOfIsCompl_range h)
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
(linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h).2 hx
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' h x x.2
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_ker (h : IsCompl p q) : ker (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = q :=
ext fun _ => mem_ker.trans (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype (h : IsCompl p q) :
(linearProjOfIsCompl p q h).comp p.subtype = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃! u : p × q, (u.fst : E) + u.snd = x :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hc).toEquiv.bijective.existsUnique _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃ (u : p) (v : q), (u : E) + v = x ∧ ∀ (r : p) (s : q), (r : E) + s = x → r = u ∧ s = v :=
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod hc x
⟨u.1, u.2, hu₁, fun r s hrs => Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 (hu₂ ⟨r, s⟩ hrs)⟩
theorem linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self (hpq : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
(p.linearProjOfIsCompl q hpq x + q.linearProjOfIsCompl p hpq.symm x : E) = x := by
dsimp only [linearProjOfIsCompl]
rw [← prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq]
exact (prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq).apply_symm_apply x
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/-- Projection to the image of an injection along a complement.
This has an advantage over `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl` in that it allows the user better
definitional control over the type. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
(LinearEquiv.ofInjective i hi).symm ∘ₗ (LinearMap.range i).linearProjOfIsCompl q h
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) (x : F) :
linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h (i x) = x := by
let ix : LinearMap.range i := ⟨i x, mem_range_self i x⟩
change linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h ix = x
rw [linearProjOfIsCompl, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left, Subtype.ext_iff,
LinearEquiv.ofInjective_apply]
/-- Given linear maps `φ` and `ψ` from complement submodules, `LinearMap.ofIsCompl` is
the induced linear map over the entire module. -/
def ofIsCompl {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q) (φ : p →ₗ[R] F) (ψ : q →ₗ[R] F) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
LinearMap.coprod φ ψ ∘ₗ ↑(Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_left_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (u : p) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (u : E) = φ u := by simp [ofIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_right_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (v : q) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (v : E) = ψ v := by simp [ofIsCompl]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : ∀ u, φ u = χ u) (hψ : ∀ u, ψ u = χ u) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ := by
ext x
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
simp [ofIsCompl, hφ, hψ]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq' (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : φ = χ.comp p.subtype) (hψ : ψ = χ.comp q.subtype) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ :=
ofIsCompl_eq h (fun _ => hφ.symm ▸ rfl) fun _ => hψ.symm ▸ rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_zero (h : IsCompl p q) : (ofIsCompl h 0 0 : E →ₗ[R] F) = 0 :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_add (h : IsCompl p q) {φ₁ φ₂ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ₁ ψ₂ : q →ₗ[R] F} :
ofIsCompl h (φ₁ + φ₂) (ψ₁ + ψ₂) = ofIsCompl h φ₁ ψ₁ + ofIsCompl h φ₂ ψ₂ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
{F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q)
{φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (c : R) : ofIsCompl h (c • φ) (c • ψ) = c • ofIsCompl h φ ψ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
section
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Module R₁ E] [Module R₁ F]
/-- The linear map from `(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)` to `E →ₗ[R₁] F`. -/
def ofIsComplProd {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q) :
(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F) →ₗ[R₁] E →ₗ[R₁] F where
toFun φ := ofIsCompl h φ.1 φ.2
map_add' := by intro φ ψ; rw [Prod.snd_add, Prod.fst_add, ofIsCompl_add]
map_smul' := by intro c φ; simp [Prod.smul_snd, Prod.smul_fst, ofIsCompl_smul]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsComplProd_apply {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q)
(φ : (p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)) : ofIsComplProd h φ = ofIsCompl h φ.1 φ.2 :=
rfl
/-- The natural linear equivalence between `(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)` and `E →ₗ[R₁] F`. -/
def ofIsComplProdEquiv {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q) :
((p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)) ≃ₗ[R₁] E →ₗ[R₁] F :=
{ ofIsComplProd h with
invFun := fun φ => ⟨φ.domRestrict p, φ.domRestrict q⟩
left_inv := fun φ ↦ by
ext x
· exact ofIsCompl_left_apply h x
· exact ofIsCompl_right_apply h x
right_inv := fun φ ↦ by
ext x
obtain ⟨a, b, hab, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
rw [← hab]; simp }
end
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_of_proj (f : E →ₗ[R] p) (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
p.linearProjOfIsCompl (ker f) (isCompl_of_proj hf) = f := by
ext x
have : x ∈ p ⊔ (ker f) := by simp only [(isCompl_of_proj hf).sup_eq_top, mem_top]
rcases mem_sup'.1 this with ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
simp [hf]
/-- If `f : E →ₗ[R] F` and `g : E →ₗ[R] G` are two surjective linear maps and
their kernels are complement of each other, then `x ↦ (f x, g x)` defines
a linear equivalence `E ≃ₗ[R] F × G`. -/
def equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ[R] G) (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : IsCompl (ker f) (ker g)) : E ≃ₗ[R] F × G :=
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (f.prod g)
| ⟨by simp [← ker_eq_bot, hfg.inf_eq_bot], by
rw [← range_eq_top]
simp [range_prod_eq hfg.sup_eq_top, *]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl {f : E →ₗ[R] F} {g : E →ₗ[R] G} (hf : range f = ⊤)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 308 | 313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
/-!
# Inequalities on iterates
In this file we prove some inequalities comparing `f^[n] x` and `g^[n] x` where `f` and `g` are
two self-maps that commute with each other.
Current selection of inequalities is motivated by formalization of the rotation number of
a circle homeomorphism.
-/
open Function
open Function (Commute)
namespace Monotone
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α] {f : α → α} {x y : ℕ → α}
/-!
### Comparison of two sequences
If $f$ is a monotone function, then $∀ k, x_{k+1} ≤ f(x_k)$ implies that $x_k$ grows slower than
$f^k(x_0)$, and similarly for the reversed inequalities. If $x_k$ and $y_k$ are two sequences such
that $x_{k+1} ≤ f(x_k)$ and $y_{k+1} ≥ f(y_k)$ for all $k < n$, then $x_0 ≤ y_0$ implies
$x_n ≤ y_n$, see `Monotone.seq_le_seq`.
If some of the inequalities in this lemma are strict, then we have $x_n < y_n$. The rest of the
lemmas in this section formalize this fact for different inequalities made strict.
-/
theorem seq_le_seq (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) (h₀ : x 0 ≤ y 0) (hx : ∀ k < n, x (k + 1) ≤ f (x k))
(hy : ∀ k < n, f (y k) ≤ y (k + 1)) : x n ≤ y n := by
induction n with
| zero => exact h₀
| succ n ihn =>
refine (hx _ n.lt_succ_self).trans ((hf <| ihn ?_ ?_).trans (hy _ n.lt_succ_self))
· exact fun k hk => hx _ (hk.trans n.lt_succ_self)
· exact fun k hk => hy _ (hk.trans n.lt_succ_self)
theorem seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le (hf : Monotone f) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h₀ : x 0 ≤ y 0)
(hx : ∀ k < n, x (k + 1) < f (x k)) (hy : ∀ k < n, f (y k) ≤ y (k + 1)) : x n < y n := by
induction n with
| zero => exact hn.false.elim
| succ n ihn =>
suffices x n ≤ y n from (hx n n.lt_succ_self).trans_le ((hf this).trans <| hy n n.lt_succ_self)
cases n with
| zero => exact h₀
| succ n =>
refine (ihn n.zero_lt_succ (fun k hk => hx _ ?_) fun k hk => hy _ ?_).le <;>
exact hk.trans n.succ.lt_succ_self
theorem seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt (hf : Monotone f) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h₀ : x 0 ≤ y 0)
(hx : ∀ k < n, x (k + 1) ≤ f (x k)) (hy : ∀ k < n, f (y k) < y (k + 1)) : x n < y n :=
hf.dual.seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn h₀ hy hx
theorem seq_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) (h₀ : x 0 < y 0)
(hx : ∀ k < n, x (k + 1) < f (x k)) (hy : ∀ k < n, f (y k) ≤ y (k + 1)) : x n < y n := by
cases n
exacts [h₀, hf.seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) h₀.le hx hy]
theorem seq_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) (h₀ : x 0 < y 0)
(hx : ∀ k < n, x (k + 1) ≤ f (x k)) (hy : ∀ k < n, f (y k) < y (k + 1)) : x n < y n :=
hf.dual.seq_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le n h₀ hy hx
/-!
### Iterates of two functions
In this section we compare the iterates of a monotone function `f : α → α` to iterates of any
function `g : β → β`. If `h : β → α` satisfies `h ∘ g ≤ f ∘ h`, then `h (g^[n] x)` grows slower
than `f^[n] (h x)`, and similarly for the reversed inequality.
Then we specialize these two lemmas to the case `β = α`, `h = id`.
-/
variable {β : Type*} {g : β → β} {h : β → α}
open Function
theorem le_iterate_comp_of_le (hf : Monotone f) (H : h ∘ g ≤ f ∘ h) (n : ℕ) :
h ∘ g^[n] ≤ f^[n] ∘ h := fun x => by
apply hf.seq_le_seq n <;> intros <;>
simp [iterate_succ', -iterate_succ, comp_apply, id_eq, le_refl]
case hx => exact H _
theorem iterate_comp_le_of_le (hf : Monotone f) (H : f ∘ h ≤ h ∘ g) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] ∘ h ≤ h ∘ g^[n] :=
hf.dual.le_iterate_comp_of_le H n
/-- If `f ≤ g` and `f` is monotone, then `f^[n] ≤ g^[n]`. -/
theorem iterate_le_of_le {g : α → α} (hf : Monotone f) (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
hf.iterate_comp_le_of_le h n
/-- If `f ≤ g` and `g` is monotone, then `f^[n] ≤ g^[n]`. -/
theorem le_iterate_of_le {g : α → α} (hg : Monotone g) (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
hg.dual.iterate_le_of_le h n
end Monotone
/-!
### Comparison of iterations and the identity function
If $f(x) ≤ x$ for all $x$ (we express this as `f ≤ id` in the code), then the same is true for
any iterate of $f$, and similarly for the reversed inequality.
-/
namespace Function
section Preorder
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α] {f : α → α}
/-- If $x ≤ f x$ for all $x$ (we write this as `id ≤ f`), then the same is true for any iterate
`f^[n]` of `f`. -/
theorem id_le_iterate_of_id_le (h : id ≤ f) (n : ℕ) : id ≤ f^[n] := by
simpa only [iterate_id] using monotone_id.iterate_le_of_le h n
theorem iterate_le_id_of_le_id (h : f ≤ id) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ id :=
@id_le_iterate_of_id_le αᵒᵈ _ f h n
theorem monotone_iterate_of_id_le (h : id ≤ f) : Monotone fun m => f^[m] :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n x => by
rw [iterate_succ_apply']
exact h _
theorem antitone_iterate_of_le_id (h : f ≤ id) : Antitone fun m => f^[m] := fun m n hmn =>
@monotone_iterate_of_id_le αᵒᵈ _ f h m n hmn
end Preorder
/-!
### Iterates of commuting functions
If `f` and `g` are monotone and commute, then `f x ≤ g x` implies `f^[n] x ≤ g^[n] x`, see
`Function.Commute.iterate_le_of_map_le`. We also prove two strict inequality versions of this lemma,
as well as `iff` versions.
-/
namespace Commute
section Preorder
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α] {f g : α → α}
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le (h : Commute f g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) {x}
(hx : f x ≤ g x) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] x ≤ g^[n] x := by
apply hf.seq_le_seq n
· rfl
· intros; rw [iterate_succ_apply']
· intros; simp [h.iterate_right _ _, hg.iterate _ hx]
theorem iterate_pos_lt_of_map_lt (h : Commute f g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : StrictMono g) {x}
(hx : f x < g x) {n} (hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x < g^[n] x := by
apply hf.seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn
· rfl
· intros; rw [iterate_succ_apply']
· intros; simp [h.iterate_right _ _, hg.iterate _ hx]
theorem iterate_pos_lt_of_map_lt' (h : Commute f g) (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : Monotone g) {x}
(hx : f x < g x) {n} (hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x < g^[n] x :=
@iterate_pos_lt_of_map_lt αᵒᵈ _ g f h.symm hg.dual hf.dual x hx n hn
end Preorder
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {f g : α → α}
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt (h : Commute f g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : StrictMono g) {x n}
(hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x < g^[n] x ↔ f x < g x := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (f x) (g x) with (H | H | H)
· simp only [*, iterate_pos_lt_of_map_lt]
· simp only [*, h.iterate_eq_of_map_eq, lt_irrefl]
· simp only [lt_asymm H, lt_asymm (h.symm.iterate_pos_lt_of_map_lt' hg hf H hn)]
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt' (h : Commute f g) (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : Monotone g) {x n}
(hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x < g^[n] x ↔ f x < g x :=
@iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h.symm hg.dual hf.dual x n hn
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le (h : Commute f g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : StrictMono g) {x n}
(hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x ≤ g^[n] x ↔ f x ≤ g x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (h.symm.iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt' hg hf hn)
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le' (h : Commute f g) (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : Monotone g) {x n}
(hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x ≤ g^[n] x ↔ f x ≤ g x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (h.symm.iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt hg hf hn)
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq (h : Commute f g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : StrictMono g) {x n}
(hn : 0 < n) : f^[n] x = g^[n] x ↔ f x = g x := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, h.iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le hf hg hn,
h.symm.iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le' hg hf hn]
end Commute
end Function
namespace Monotone
|
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α] {f : α → α} {x : α}
| Mathlib/Order/Iterate.lean | 207 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : Fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives coefficients of a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : Fin 2 → Fin 2 → α`.
In later files we introduce `!![a, b; c, d]` as notation for `Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Main definitions
* `vecEmpty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vecCons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section MatrixNotation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α :=
Fin.elim0
/-- `vecCons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vecHead` and `vecTail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vecCons a (vecCons b ...)`.
-/
def vecCons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : Fin n → α) : Fin n.succ → α :=
Fin.cons h t
/-- `![...]` notation is used to construct a vector `Fin n → α` using `Matrix.vecEmpty` and
`Matrix.vecCons`.
For instance, `![a, b, c] : Fin 3` is syntax for `vecCons a (vecCons b (vecCons c vecEmpty))`.
Note that this should not be used as syntax for `Matrix` as it generates a term with the wrong type.
The `!![a, b; c, d]` syntax (provided by `Matrix.matrixNotation`) should be used instead.
-/
syntax (name := vecNotation) "![" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(![$term:term, $terms:term,*]) => `(vecCons $term ![$terms,*])
| `(![$term:term]) => `(vecCons $term ![])
| `(![]) => `(vecEmpty)
/-- Unexpander for the `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecCons]
def vecConsUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $term ![$term2, $terms,*]) => `(![$term, $term2, $terms,*])
| `($_ $term ![$term2]) => `(![$term, $term2])
| `($_ $term ![]) => `(![$term])
| _ => throw ()
/-- Unexpander for the `![]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecEmpty]
def vecEmptyUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_:ident) => `(![])
| _ => throw ()
/-- `vecHead v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vecHead {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
/-- `vecTail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vecTail {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : Fin n → α :=
v ∘ Fin.succ
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `Fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance _root_.PiFin.hasRepr [Repr α] : Repr (Fin n → α) where
reprPrec f _ :=
Std.Format.bracket "![" (Std.Format.joinSep
((List.finRange n).map fun n => repr (f n)) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
end MatrixNotation
variable {m n o : ℕ}
theorem empty_eq (v : Fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
section Val
@[simp]
theorem head_fin_const (a : α) : (vecHead fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u 0 = x :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (i : Fin m) : vecCons x u i.succ = u i := by
simp [vecCons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecCons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := by
simp only [vecCons, Fin.cons, Fin.cases_succ']
section simprocs
open Lean Qq
/-- Parses a chain of `Matrix.vecCons` calls into elements, leaving everything else in the tail.
`let ⟨xs, tailn, tail⟩ ← matchVecConsPrefix n e` decomposes `e : Fin n → _` in the form
`vecCons x₀ <| ... <| vecCons xₙ <| tail` where `tail : Fin tailn → _`. -/
partial def matchVecConsPrefix (n : Q(Nat)) (e : Expr) : MetaM <| List Expr × Q(Nat) × Expr := do
match_expr ← Meta.whnfR e with
| Matrix.vecCons _ n x xs => do
let (elems, n', tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix n xs
return (x :: elems, n', tail)
| _ =>
return ([], n, e)
open Qq in
/-- A simproc that handles terms of the form `Matrix.vecCons a f i` where `i` is a numeric literal.
In practice, this is most effective at handling `![a, b, c] i`-style terms. -/
dsimproc cons_val (Matrix.vecCons _ _ _) := fun e => do
let_expr Matrix.vecCons α en x xs' ei := ← Meta.whnfR e | return .continue
let some i := ei.int? | return .continue
let (xs, etailn, tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix en xs'
let xs := x :: xs
-- Determine if the tail is a numeral or only an offset.
let (tailn, variadic, etailn) ← do
let etailn_whnf : Q(ℕ) ← Meta.whnfD etailn
if let Expr.lit (.natVal length) := etailn_whnf then
pure (length, false, q(OfNat.ofNat $etailn_whnf))
else if let .some ((base : Q(ℕ)), offset) ← (Meta.isOffset? etailn_whnf).run then
let offset_e : Q(ℕ) := mkNatLit offset
pure (offset, true, q($base + $offset))
else
pure (0, true, etailn)
-- Wrap the index if possible, and abort if not
let wrapped_i ←
if variadic then
-- can't wrap as we don't know the length
unless 0 ≤ i ∧ i < xs.length + tailn do return .continue
pure i.toNat
else
pure (i % (xs.length + tailn)).toNat
if h : wrapped_i < xs.length then
return .continue xs[wrapped_i]
else
-- Within the `tail`
let _ ← synthInstanceQ q(NeZero $etailn)
have i_lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (wrapped_i - xs.length)
return .continue (.some <| .app tail q(OfNat.ofNat $i_lit : Fin $etailn))
end simprocs
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecHead (vecCons x u) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecTail (vecCons x u) = u := by
ext
simp [vecTail]
theorem empty_val' {n' : Type*} (j : n') : (fun i => (![] : Fin 0 → n' → α) i j) = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_head_tail (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons (vecHead u) (vecTail u) = u :=
Fin.cons_self_tail _
@[simp]
theorem range_cons (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) : Set.range (vecCons x u) = {x} ∪ Set.range u :=
Set.ext fun y => by simp [Fin.exists_fin_succ, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem range_empty (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range u = ∅ :=
Set.range_eq_empty _
theorem range_cons_empty (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range (Matrix.vecCons x u) = {x} := by
rw [range_cons, range_empty, Set.union_empty]
-- simp can prove this (up to commutativity)
theorem range_cons_cons_empty (x y : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) :
Set.range (vecCons x <| vecCons y u) = {x, y} := by
rw [range_cons, range_cons_empty, Set.singleton_union]
theorem vecCons_const (a : α) : (vecCons a fun _ : Fin n => a) = fun _ => a :=
funext <| Fin.forall_iff_succ.2 ⟨rfl, cons_val_succ _ _⟩
theorem vec_single_eq_const (a : α) : ![a] = fun _ => a :=
let _ : Unique (Fin 1) := inferInstance
funext <| Unique.forall_iff.2 rfl
/-- `![a, b, ...] 1` is equal to `b`.
The simplifier needs a special lemma for length `≥ 2`, in addition to
`cons_val_succ`, because `1 : Fin 1 = 0 : Fin 1`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_one (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons x u 1 = u 0 :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_two (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ → α) : vecCons x u 2 = vecHead (vecTail u) := rfl
lemma cons_val_three (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 3 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail u)) :=
rfl
lemma cons_val_four (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 4 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail (vecTail u))) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_fin_one (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : ∀ (i : Fin 1), vecCons x u i = x := by
rw [Fin.forall_fin_one]
rfl
theorem cons_fin_one (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : vecCons x u = fun _ => x :=
funext (cons_val_fin_one x u)
open Lean Qq in
/-- `mkVecLiteralQ ![x, y, z]` produces the term `q(![$x, $y, $z])`. -/
def _root_.PiFin.mkLiteralQ {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {n : ℕ} (elems : Fin n → Q($α)) :
Q(Fin $n → $α) :=
loop 0 (Nat.zero_le _) q(vecEmpty)
where
loop (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n) (rest : Q(Fin $i → $α)) : let i' : Nat := i + 1; Q(Fin $(i') → $α) :=
if h : i < n then
loop (i + 1) h q(vecCons $(elems (Fin.rev ⟨i, h⟩)) $rest)
else
rest
attribute [nolint docBlame] _root_.PiFin.mkLiteralQ.loop
open Lean Qq in
protected instance _root_.PiFin.toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToExpr α] (n : ℕ) : ToExpr (Fin n → α) :=
have lu := toLevel.{u}
have eα : Q(Type $lu) := toTypeExpr α
let toTypeExpr := q(Fin $n → $eα)
{ toTypeExpr, toExpr v := PiFin.mkLiteralQ fun i => show Q($eα) from toExpr (v i) }
/-! ### `bit0` and `bit1` indices
The following definitions and `simp` lemmas are used to allow
numeral-indexed element of a vector given with matrix notation to
be extracted by `simp` in Lean 3 (even when the numeral is larger than the
number of elements in the vector, which is taken modulo that number
of elements by virtue of the semantics of `bit0` and `bit1` and of
addition on `Fin n`).
-/
/-- `vecAppend ho u v` appends two vectors of lengths `m` and `n` to produce
one of length `o = m + n`. This is a variant of `Fin.append` with an additional `ho` argument,
which provides control of definitional equality for the vector length.
This turns out to be helpful when providing simp lemmas to reduce `![a, b, c] n`, and also means
that `vecAppend ho u v 0` is valid. `Fin.append u v 0` is not valid in this case because there is
no `Zero (Fin (m + n))` instance. -/
def vecAppend {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o = m + n) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) : Fin o → α :=
Fin.append u v ∘ Fin.cast ho
theorem vecAppend_eq_ite {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o = m + n) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAppend ho u v = fun i : Fin o =>
if h : (i : ℕ) < m then u ⟨i, h⟩ else v ⟨(i : ℕ) - m, by omega⟩ := by
ext i
rw [vecAppend, Fin.append, Function.comp_apply, Fin.addCases]
congr with hi
simp only [eq_rec_constant]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecAppend_apply_zero {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o + 1 = m + 1 + n) (u : Fin (m + 1) → α)
(v : Fin n → α) : vecAppend ho u v 0 = u 0 :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecAppend (v : Fin n → α) : vecAppend n.zero_add.symm ![] v = v := by
ext
simp [vecAppend_eq_ite]
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecAppend (ho : o + 1 = m + 1 + n) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAppend ho (vecCons x u) v = vecCons x (vecAppend (by omega) u v) := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecAppend_eq_ite]
split_ifs with h
· rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· simp
· simp only [Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right, Fin.val_mk] at h
simp [h]
· rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· simp at h
· rw [not_lt, Fin.val_mk, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right] at h
simp [h, not_lt.2 h]
/-- `vecAlt0 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (even-numbered). -/
def vecAlt0 (hm : m = n + n) (v : Fin m → α) (k : Fin n) : α := v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k, by omega⟩
/-- `vecAlt1 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (odd-numbered). -/
def vecAlt1 (hm : m = n + n) (v : Fin m → α) (k : Fin n) : α :=
v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k + 1, hm.symm ▸ Nat.add_succ_lt_add k.2 k.2⟩
section bits
theorem vecAlt0_vecAppend (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAlt0 rfl (vecAppend rfl v v) = v ∘ (fun n ↦ n + n) := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp, vecAlt0, vecAppend_eq_ite]
split_ifs with h <;> congr
· rw [Fin.val_mk] at h
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
· rw [Fin.val_mk, not_lt] at h
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_mk, Nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h]
refine (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt ?_).symm
omega
theorem vecAlt1_vecAppend (v : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
vecAlt1 rfl (vecAppend rfl v v) = v ∘ (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp, vecAlt1, vecAppend_eq_ite]
cases n with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := i
simp only [Nat.zero_add, Nat.lt_one_iff] at hi; subst i; rfl
| succ n =>
split_ifs with h <;> congr
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, h]
· rw [Fin.val_mk, not_lt] at h
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_mk, Nat.mod_add_mod, Fin.val_one,
Nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h, show 1 % (n + 2) = 1 from Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]
refine (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt ?_).symm
omega
@[simp]
theorem vecHead_vecAlt0 (hm : m + 2 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (v : Fin (m + 2) → α) :
vecHead (vecAlt0 hm v) = v 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecHead_vecAlt1 (hm : m + 2 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (v : Fin (m + 2) → α) :
vecHead (vecAlt1 hm v) = v 1 := by simp [vecHead, vecAlt1]
theorem cons_vec_bit0_eq_alt0 (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
vecCons x u (i + i) = vecAlt0 rfl (vecAppend rfl (vecCons x u) (vecCons x u)) i := by
rw [vecAlt0_vecAppend]; rfl
theorem cons_vec_bit1_eq_alt1 (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
vecCons x u ((i + i) + 1) = vecAlt1 rfl (vecAppend rfl (vecCons x u) (vecCons x u)) i := by
rw [vecAlt1_vecAppend]; rfl
end bits
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecAlt0 (h : m + 1 + 1 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (x y : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecAlt0 h (vecCons x (vecCons y u)) = vecCons x (vecAlt0 (by omega) u) := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecAlt0]
rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· rfl
· simp only [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm, cons_val_succ',
cons_vecAppend, Nat.add_eq, vecAlt0]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecAlt0 (α) {h} : vecAlt0 h (![] : Fin 0 → α) = ![] := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecAlt1 (h : m + 1 + 1 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (x y : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecAlt1 h (vecCons x (vecCons y u)) = vecCons y (vecAlt1 (by omega) u) := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecAlt1]
rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· rfl
· simp [vecAlt1, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecAlt1 (α) {h} : vecAlt1 h (![] : Fin 0 → α) = ![] := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end Val
lemma const_fin1_eq (x : α) : (fun _ : Fin 1 => x) = ![x] :=
(cons_fin_one x _).symm
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/VecNotation.lean | 455 | 458 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
/-!
# Nontrivial types
A type is *nontrivial* if it contains at least two elements. This is useful in particular for rings
(where it is equivalent to the fact that zero is different from one) and for vector spaces
(where it is equivalent to the fact that the dimension is positive).
We introduce a typeclass `Nontrivial` formalizing this property.
Basic results about nontrivial types are in `Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that a type is not reduced to a single element. In rings,
this is equivalent to `0 ≠ 1`. In vector spaces, this is equivalent to positive dimension. -/
class Nontrivial (α : Type*) : Prop where
/-- In a nontrivial type, there exists a pair of distinct terms. -/
exists_pair_ne : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.exists_pair_ne, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem exists_pair_ne (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
Nontrivial.exists_pair_ne
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.exists_ne [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨y, y', h⟩
by_cases hx : x = y
· rw [← hx] at h
exact ⟨y', h.symm⟩
· exact ⟨y, Ne.symm hx⟩
open Classical in
theorem exists_ne [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := Decidable.exists_ne x
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
theorem nontrivial_of_ne (x y : α) (h : x ≠ y) : Nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (x : α) : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ y, y ≠ x :=
⟨fun h ↦ @exists_ne α h x, fun ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ nontrivial_of_ne _ _ hy⟩
instance : Nontrivial Prop :=
⟨⟨True, False, true_ne_false⟩⟩
/-- See Note [lower instance priority]
Note that since this and `instNonemptyOfInhabited` are the most "obvious" way to find a nonempty
instance if no direct instance can be found, we give this a higher priority than the usual `100`.
-/
instance (priority := 500) Nontrivial.to_nonempty [Nontrivial α] : Nonempty α :=
let ⟨x, _⟩ := _root_.exists_pair_ne α
⟨x⟩
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton α ↔ ∀ x y : α, x = y :=
⟨by
intro h
exact Subsingleton.elim, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton : ¬Nontrivial α ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [nontrivial_iff, subsingleton_iff, not_exists, Classical.not_not]
theorem not_nontrivial (α) [Subsingleton α] : ¬Nontrivial α :=
fun ⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩ ↦ h <| Subsingleton.elim x y
theorem not_subsingleton (α) [Nontrivial α] : ¬Subsingleton α :=
fun _ => not_nontrivial _ ‹_›
lemma not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial : ¬ Subsingleton α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
/-- A type is either a subsingleton or nontrivial. -/
theorem subsingleton_or_nontrivial (α : Type*) : Subsingleton α ∨ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, or_comm]
exact Classical.em _
theorem false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] [Subsingleton α] : False :=
not_nontrivial _ ‹_›
/-- Pullback a `Nontrivial` instance along a surjective function. -/
protected theorem Function.Surjective.nontrivial [Nontrivial β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Nontrivial α := by
rcases exists_pair_ne β with ⟨x, y, h⟩
rcases hf x with ⟨x', hx'⟩
| rcases hf y with ⟨y', hy'⟩
have : x' ≠ y' := by
| Mathlib/Logic/Nontrivial/Defs.lean | 95 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.UnitBall
/-!
# The circle
This file defines `circle` to be the metric sphere (`Metric.sphere`) in `ℂ` centred at `0` of
radius `1`. We equip it with the following structure:
* a submonoid of `ℂ`
* a group
* a topological group
We furthermore define `Circle.exp` to be the natural map `fun t ↦ exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to
`circle`, and show that this map is a group homomorphism.
We define two additive characters onto the circle:
* `Real.fourierChar`: The character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we introduce the
notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`). This uses the analyst convention that there is a
`2 * π` in the exponent.
* `Real.probChar`: The character `fun x ↦ exp (x * I)`, which uses the probabilist convention that
there is no `2 * π` in the exponent.
## Implementation notes
Because later (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Sphere`) one wants to equip the circle with a smooth
manifold structure borrowed from `Metric.sphere`, the underlying set is
`{z : ℂ | abs (z - 0) = 1}`. This prevents certain algebraic facts from working definitionally --
for example, the circle is not defeq to `{z : ℂ | abs z = 1}`, which is the kernel of `Complex.abs`
considered as a homomorphism from `ℂ` to `ℝ`, nor is it defeq to `{z : ℂ | normSq z = 1}`, which
is the kernel of the homomorphism `Complex.normSq` from `ℂ` to `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Function Metric
open ComplexConjugate
/-- The unit circle in `ℂ`. -/
def Circle : Type := Submonoid.unitSphere ℂ
deriving TopologicalSpace
namespace Circle
variable {x y : Circle}
instance instCoeOut : CoeOut Circle ℂ := subtypeCoe
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup Circle := Metric.sphere.instCommGroup
instance instMetricSpace : MetricSpace Circle := Subtype.metricSpace
@[ext] lemma ext : (x : ℂ) = y → x = y := Subtype.ext
lemma coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : Circle → ℂ) := fun _ _ ↦ ext
-- Not simp because `SetLike.coe_eq_coe` already proves it
lemma coe_inj : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := coe_injective.eq_iff
| lemma norm_coe (z : Circle) : ‖(z : ℂ)‖ = 1 := mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.1 z.2
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Circle.lean | 66 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.List.Zip
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Range
/-!
# The powerset of a multiset
-/
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### powerset -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: Write a more efficient version
/-- A helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` as multisets. -/
def powersetAux (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists l).map (↑)
theorem powersetAux_eq_map_coe {l : List α} : powersetAux l = (sublists l).map (↑) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetAux {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetAux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp [powersetAux_eq_map_coe, Subperm, and_comm]
/-- Helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` (using `sublists'`), as multisets. -/
def powersetAux' (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists' l).map (↑)
theorem powersetAux_perm_powersetAux' {l : List α} : powersetAux l ~ powersetAux' l := by
rw [powersetAux_eq_map_coe]; exact (sublists_perm_sublists' _).map _
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_nil : powersetAux' (@nil α) = [0] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
powersetAux' (a :: l) = powersetAux' l ++ List.map (cons a) (powersetAux' l) := by
simp [powersetAux']
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux' l₁ ~ powersetAux' l₂ := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ IH =>
simp only [powersetAux'_cons]
exact IH.append (IH.map _)
| swap a b =>
simp only [powersetAux'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_assoc]
apply Perm.append_left
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
| trans _ _ IH₁ IH₂ => exact IH₁.trans IH₂
theorem powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux l₁ ~ powersetAux l₂ :=
powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.trans <|
(powerset_aux'_perm p).trans powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.symm
--Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11083): slightly slower implementation due to `map ofList`
/-- The power set of a multiset. -/
def powerset (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s
(fun l => (powersetAux l : Multiset (Multiset α)))
(fun _ _ h => Quot.sound (powersetAux_perm h))
theorem powerset_coe (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
congr_arg ((↑) : List (Multiset α) → Multiset (Multiset α)) powersetAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem powerset_coe' (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists' l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
Quot.sound powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
@[simp]
theorem powerset_zero : @powerset α 0 = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powerset_cons (a : α) (s) : powerset (a ::ₘ s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {s t : Multiset α} : s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t <| by simp [Subperm, and_comm]
theorem map_single_le_powerset (s : Multiset α) : s.map singleton ≤ powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [powerset_coe, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_le, map_coe]
show l.map (((↑) : List α → Multiset α) ∘ pure) <+~ (sublists l).map (↑)
rw [← List.map_map]
exact ((map_pure_sublist_sublists _).map _).subperm
@[simp]
theorem card_powerset (s : Multiset α) : card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp
theorem revzip_powersetAux {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux l)) : x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux_eq_map_coe, ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists _ _ _ h)
theorem revzip_powersetAux' {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux' l)) :
x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux', ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists' _ _ _ h)
theorem revzip_powersetAux_lemma {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {l' : List (Multiset α)}
(H : ∀ ⦃x : _ × _⦄, x ∈ revzip l' → x.1 + x.2 = ↑l) :
revzip l' = l'.map fun x => (x, (l : Multiset α) - x) := by
have :
Forall₂ (fun (p : Multiset α × Multiset α) (s : Multiset α) => p = (s, ↑l - s)) (revzip l')
((revzip l').map Prod.fst) := by
rw [forall₂_map_right_iff, forall₂_same]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ h
dsimp
rw [← H h, add_tsub_cancel_left]
rw [← forall₂_eq_eq_eq, forall₂_map_right_iff]
simpa using this
theorem revzip_powersetAux_perm_aux' {l : List α} :
revzip (powersetAux l) ~ revzip (powersetAux' l) := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux']
exact powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.map _
theorem revzip_powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
revzip (powersetAux l₁) ~ revzip (powersetAux l₂) := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
simp only [fun l : List α => revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, coe_eq_coe.2 p]
exact (powersetAux_perm p).map _
/-! ### powersetCard -/
/-- Helper function for `powersetCard`. Given a list `l`, `powersetCardAux n l` is the list
of sublists of length `n`, as multisets. -/
def powersetCardAux (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
sublistsLenAux n l (↑) []
theorem powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe {n} {l : List α} :
powersetCardAux n l = (sublistsLen n l).map (↑) := by
rw [powersetCardAux, sublistsLenAux_eq, append_nil]
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetCardAux {n} {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetCardAux n l ↔ s ≤ ↑l ∧ card s = n :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe, List.mem_map, mem_sublistsLen,
coe_eq_coe, coe_le, Subperm, exists_prop, coe_card]
exact fun l₁ =>
⟨fun ⟨l₂, ⟨s, e⟩, p⟩ => ⟨⟨_, p, s⟩, p.symm.length_eq.trans e⟩,
fun ⟨⟨l₂, p, s⟩, e⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨s, p.length_eq.trans e⟩, p⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem powersetCardAux_zero (l : List α) : powersetCardAux 0 l = [0] := by
simp [powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe]
@[simp]
theorem powersetCardAux_nil (n : ℕ) : powersetCardAux (n + 1) (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powersetCardAux_cons (n : ℕ) (a : α) (l : List α) :
powersetCardAux (n + 1) (a :: l) =
powersetCardAux (n + 1) l ++ List.map (cons a) (powersetCardAux n l) := by
simp [powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe]
theorem powersetCardAux_perm {n} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powersetCardAux n l₁ ~ powersetCardAux n l₂ := by
induction' n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂
· simp
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ p IH =>
simp only [powersetCardAux_cons]
exact IH.append ((IHn p).map _)
| swap a b =>
simp only [powersetCardAux_cons, append_assoc]
apply Perm.append_left
cases n
· simp [Perm.swap]
simp only [powersetCardAux_cons, map_append, List.map_map]
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
| trans _ _ IH₁ IH₂ => exact IH₁.trans IH₂
/-- `powersetCard n s` is the multiset of all submultisets of `s` of length `n`. -/
def powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (powersetCardAux n l : Multiset (Multiset α))) fun _ _ h =>
Quot.sound (powersetCardAux_perm h)
theorem powersetCard_coe' (n) (l : List α) : @powersetCard α n l = powersetCardAux n l :=
rfl
theorem powersetCard_coe (n) (l : List α) :
@powersetCard α n l = ((sublistsLen n l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
congr_arg ((↑) : List (Multiset α) → Multiset (Multiset α)) powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem powersetCard_zero_left (s : Multiset α) : powersetCard 0 s = {0} :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [powersetCard_coe']
theorem powersetCard_zero_right (n : ℕ) : @powersetCard α (n + 1) 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powersetCard_cons (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s) :
powersetCard (n + 1) (a ::ₘ s) = powersetCard (n + 1) s + map (cons a) (powersetCard n s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [powersetCard_coe']
theorem powersetCard_one (s : Multiset α) : powersetCard 1 s = s.map singleton :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by
simp [powersetCard_coe, sublistsLen_one, map_reverse, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetCard {n : ℕ} {s t : Multiset α} : s ∈ powersetCard n t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ card s = n :=
Quotient.inductionOn t fun l => by simp [powersetCard_coe']
@[simp]
theorem card_powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Multiset α) :
card (powersetCard n s) = Nat.choose (card s) n :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp [powersetCard_coe]
theorem powersetCard_le_powerset (n : ℕ) (s : Multiset α) : powersetCard n s ≤ powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, powersetCard_coe, powerset_coe', coe_le]
exact ((sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _).subperm
theorem powersetCard_mono (n : ℕ) {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) :
powersetCard n s ≤ powersetCard n t :=
leInductionOn h fun {l₁ l₂} h => by
| simp only [powersetCard_coe, coe_le]
exact ((sublistsLen_sublist_of_sublist _ h).map _).subperm
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Powerset.lean | 246 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Constructions
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.OpenImmersion
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.LimitsOfProductsAndEqualizers
/-!
# Colimits of LocallyRingedSpace
We construct the explicit coproducts and coequalizers of `LocallyRingedSpace`.
It then follows that `LocallyRingedSpace` has all colimits, and
`forgetToSheafedSpace` preserves them.
-/
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w' w v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
attribute [local instance] Opposite.small
namespace SheafedSpace
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {J : Type w} [Category.{w'} J] [Small.{v} J] (F : J ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C)
theorem isColimit_exists_rep [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) (x : c.pt) :
∃ (i : J) (y : F.obj i), (c.ι.app i).base y = x :=
Concrete.isColimit_exists_rep (F ⋙ forget C) (isColimitOfPreserves (forget C) hc) x
-- Porting note: argument `C` of colimit need to be made explicit, odd
theorem colimit_exists_rep [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C] (x : colimit (C := SheafedSpace C) F) :
∃ (i : J) (y : F.obj i), (colimit.ι F i).base y = x :=
Concrete.isColimit_exists_rep (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C)
(isColimitOfPreserves (SheafedSpace.forget _) (colimit.isColimit F)) x
instance [HasLimits C] {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : Epi (coequalizer.π f g).base := by
rw [← show _ = (coequalizer.π f g).base from
ι_comp_coequalizerComparison f g (SheafedSpace.forget C),
← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom]
apply epi_comp
end SheafedSpace
namespace LocallyRingedSpace
section HasCoproducts
variable {ι : Type v} [Small.{u} ι] (F : Discrete ι ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
/-- The explicit coproduct for `F : discrete ι ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
noncomputable def coproduct : LocallyRingedSpace where
toSheafedSpace := colimit (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace)
isLocalRing x := by
obtain ⟨i, y, ⟨⟩⟩ := SheafedSpace.colimit_exists_rep (F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) x
haveI : IsLocalRing (((F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace).obj i).presheaf.stalk y) :=
(F.obj i).isLocalRing _
exact
(asIso ((colimit.ι (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) i :).stalkMap y)).symm.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.isLocalRing
/-- The explicit coproduct cofan for `F : discrete ι ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
noncomputable def coproductCofan : Cocone F where
pt := coproduct F
ι :=
{ app := fun j => ⟨colimit.ι (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) j, inferInstance⟩
naturality := fun ⟨j⟩ ⟨j'⟩ ⟨⟨(f : j = j')⟩⟩ => by subst f; simp }
/-- The explicit coproduct cofan constructed in `coproduct_cofan` is indeed a colimit. -/
noncomputable def coproductCofanIsColimit : IsColimit (coproductCofan F) where
desc s :=
⟨colimit.desc (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) (forgetToSheafedSpace.mapCocone s), by
intro x
obtain ⟨i, y, ⟨⟩⟩ := SheafedSpace.colimit_exists_rep (F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) x
have := PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp
(colimit.ι (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) i)
(colimit.desc (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(F ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace) (forgetToSheafedSpace.mapCocone s)) y
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
erw [← this,
PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(colimit.ι_desc (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u})
(forgetToSheafedSpace.mapCocone s) i :)]
haveI :
IsLocalHom
(((forgetToSheafedSpace.mapCocone s).ι.app i).stalkMap y).hom :=
(s.ι.app i).2 y
infer_instance⟩
fac _ _ := LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(colimit.ι_desc (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u}) _ _)
uniq s f h :=
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(IsColimit.uniq _ (forgetToSheafedSpace.mapCocone s) f.toShHom fun j =>
congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom (h j))
instance : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete ι) LocallyRingedSpace.{u} :=
⟨fun F => ⟨⟨⟨_, coproductCofanIsColimit F⟩⟩⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : PreservesColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{v} ι) forgetToSheafedSpace.{u} :=
⟨fun {G} =>
preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone (coproductCofanIsColimit G)
((colimit.isColimit (C := SheafedSpace.{u+1, u, u} CommRingCat.{u}) _).ofIsoColimit
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun _ => Category.comp_id _))⟩
end HasCoproducts
section HasCoequalizer
variable {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace.{v}} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
namespace HasCoequalizer
@[instance]
theorem coequalizer_π_app_isLocalHom
(U : TopologicalSpace.Opens (coequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom).carrier) :
IsLocalHom ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom :).c.app (op U)).hom := by
have := ι_comp_coequalizerComparison f.toShHom g.toShHom SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
rw [← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom] at this
erw [SheafedSpace.congr_app this.symm (op U)]
rw [PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, ← PresheafedSpace.colimitPresheafObjIsoComponentwiseLimit_hom_π]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10754): this instance has to be manually added
haveI : IsIso (PreservesCoequalizer.iso
SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace f.toShHom g.toShHom).hom.c :=
PresheafedSpace.c_isIso_of_iso _
-- Had to add this instance too.
have := CommRingCat.equalizer_ι_isLocalHom' (PresheafedSpace.componentwiseDiagram _
((Opens.map
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace (Hom.toShHom f)
(Hom.toShHom g)).hom.base).obj
(unop (op U))))
infer_instance
/-!
We roughly follow the construction given in [MR0302656]. Given a pair `f, g : X ⟶ Y` of morphisms
of locally ringed spaces, we want to show that the stalk map of
`π = coequalizer.π f g` (as sheafed space homs) is a local ring hom. It then follows that
`coequalizer f g` is indeed a locally ringed space, and `coequalizer.π f g` is a morphism of
locally ringed space.
Given a germ `⟨U, s⟩` of `x : coequalizer f g` such that `π꙳ x : Y` is invertible, we ought to show
that `⟨U, s⟩` is invertible. That is, there exists an open set `U' ⊆ U` containing `x` such that the
restriction of `s` onto `U'` is invertible. This `U'` is given by `π '' V`, where `V` is the
basic open set of `π⋆x`.
Since `f ⁻¹' V = Y.basic_open (f ≫ π)꙳ x = Y.basic_open (g ≫ π)꙳ x = g ⁻¹' V`, we have
`π ⁻¹' (π '' V) = V` (as the underlying set map is merely the set-theoretic coequalizer).
This shows that `π '' V` is indeed open, and `s` is invertible on `π '' V` as the components of `π꙳`
are local ring homs.
-/
variable (U : Opens (coequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom).carrier)
variable (s : (coequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom).presheaf.obj (op U))
/-- (Implementation). The basic open set of the section `π꙳ s`. -/
noncomputable def imageBasicOpen : Opens Y :=
Y.toRingedSpace.basicOpen
(show Y.presheaf.obj (op (unop _)) from ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).c.app (op U)) s)
theorem imageBasicOpen_image_preimage :
(coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base ⁻¹' ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base ''
(imageBasicOpen f g U s).1) = (imageBasicOpen f g U s).1 := by
fapply Types.coequalizer_preimage_image_eq_of_preimage_eq f.base
-- Porting note: Type of `f.base` and `g.base` needs to be explicit
(g.base : X.carrier.1 ⟶ Y.carrier.1)
· ext
simp_rw [types_comp_apply, ← TopCat.comp_app, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base]
congr 3
exact coequalizer.condition f.toShHom g.toShHom
· apply isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit (forget TopCat)
apply isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit (SheafedSpace.forget _)
exact coequalizerIsCoequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom
· suffices
(TopologicalSpace.Opens.map f.base).obj (imageBasicOpen f g U s) =
(TopologicalSpace.Opens.map g.base).obj (imageBasicOpen f g U s)
by injection this
delta imageBasicOpen
rw [preimage_basicOpen f, preimage_basicOpen g]
dsimp only [Functor.op, unop_op]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): change `rw` to `erw`
erw [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← SheafedSpace.comp_c_app', ← CommRingCat.comp_apply,
← SheafedSpace.comp_c_app',
SheafedSpace.congr_app (coequalizer.condition f.toShHom g.toShHom),
CommRingCat.comp_apply, X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen_res]
apply inf_eq_right.mpr
refine (RingedSpace.basicOpen_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [coequalizer.condition f.toShHom g.toShHom]
theorem imageBasicOpen_image_open :
IsOpen ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base '' (imageBasicOpen f g U s).1) := by
rw [← (TopCat.homeoOfIso (PreservesCoequalizer.iso (SheafedSpace.forget _) f.toShHom
g.toShHom)).isOpen_preimage, TopCat.coequalizer_isOpen_iff, ← Set.preimage_comp]
erw [← TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom, ι_comp_coequalizerComparison]
dsimp only [SheafedSpace.forget]
rw [imageBasicOpen_image_preimage]
exact (imageBasicOpen f g U s).2
@[instance]
theorem coequalizer_π_stalk_isLocalHom (x : Y) :
IsLocalHom ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom :).stalkMap x).hom := by
constructor
rintro a ha
rcases TopCat.Presheaf.germ_exist _ _ a with ⟨U, hU, s, rfl⟩
rw [-- Manually apply `elementwise_of%` to generate a `ConcreteCategory` lemma
elementwise_of% PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ
(coequalizer.π (C := SheafedSpace _) f.toShHom g.toShHom) U _ hU] at ha
let V := imageBasicOpen f g U s
have hV : (coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base ⁻¹'
((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base '' V.1) = V.1 :=
imageBasicOpen_image_preimage f g U s
have hV' : V = ⟨(coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base ⁻¹'
((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base '' V.1), hV.symm ▸ V.2⟩ :=
SetLike.ext' hV.symm
have V_open : IsOpen ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base '' V.1) :=
imageBasicOpen_image_open f g U s
have VleU : ⟨(coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base '' V.1, V_open⟩ ≤ U :=
Set.image_subset_iff.mpr (Y.toRingedSpace.basicOpen_le _)
have hxV : x ∈ V := ⟨hU, ha⟩
rw [← (coequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom).presheaf.germ_res_apply (homOfLE VleU) _
(@Set.mem_image_of_mem _ _ (coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base x V.1 hxV) s]
apply RingHom.isUnit_map
rw [← isUnit_map_iff ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom :).c.app _).hom,
← CommRingCat.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, CommRingCat.comp_apply,
← isUnit_map_iff (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom hV').op).hom]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): change `rw` to `erw`
erw [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
convert @RingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen Y.toRingedSpace (unop _)
(((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).c.app (op U)) s)
end HasCoequalizer
/-- The coequalizer of two locally ringed space in the category of sheafed spaces is a locally
ringed space. -/
noncomputable def coequalizer : LocallyRingedSpace where
toSheafedSpace := Limits.coequalizer f.toShHom g.toShHom
isLocalRing x := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ :=
(TopCat.epi_iff_surjective (coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base).mp inferInstance x
exact ((coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom :).stalkMap y).hom.domain_isLocalRing
/-- The explicit coequalizer cofork of locally ringed spaces. -/
noncomputable def coequalizerCofork : Cofork f g :=
@Cofork.ofπ _ _ _ _ f g (coequalizer f g) ⟨coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom,
-- Porting note: this used to be automatic
HasCoequalizer.coequalizer_π_stalk_isLocalHom _ _⟩
(LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext' (coequalizer.condition f.toShHom g.toShHom))
theorem isLocalHom_stalkMap_congr {X Y : RingedSpace} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (H : f = g) (x)
(h : IsLocalHom (f.stalkMap x).hom) :
IsLocalHom (g.stalkMap x).hom := by
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _ H.symm x]; infer_instance
/-- The cofork constructed in `coequalizer_cofork` is indeed a colimit cocone. -/
noncomputable def coequalizerCoforkIsColimit : IsColimit (coequalizerCofork f g) := by
apply Cofork.IsColimit.mk'
intro s
have e : f.toShHom ≫ s.π.toShHom = g.toShHom ≫ s.π.toShHom := by injection s.condition
refine ⟨⟨coequalizer.desc s.π.toShHom e, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x
rcases (TopCat.epi_iff_surjective
(coequalizer.π f.toShHom g.toShHom).base).mp inferInstance x with ⟨y, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply isLocalHom_of_comp _ (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap ...)`, this
-- used to allow you to provide the proof that `... ≫ ...` is a local ring homomorphism later,
| -- but this is no longer possible
set h := _
change IsLocalHom h
suffices _ : IsLocalHom (((coequalizerCofork f g).π.1.stalkMap _).hom.comp h) by
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/LocallyRingedSpace/HasColimits.lean | 276 | 279 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.