Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Function TopologicalSpace Topology Set UniformSpace Uniformity
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
theorem cauchy_map_iff' {l : Filter β} [hl : NeBot l] {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans <| and_iff_right hl
theorem Cauchy.mono {f g : Filter α} [hg : NeBot g] (h_c : Cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (Filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
theorem Cauchy.mono' {f g : Filter α} (h_c : Cauchy f) (_ : NeBot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
theorem cauchy_nhds {a : α} : Cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_neBot, nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)⟩
theorem cauchy_pure {a : α} : Cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchy_map {l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma Cauchy.mono_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} (huv : u ≤ v)
(hF : Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F) : Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F :=
⟨hF.1, hF.2.trans huv⟩
lemma cauchy_inf_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u ⊓ v) F ↔
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F ∧ Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [inf_uniformity (u := u), le_inf_iff, and_and_left]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff, forall_and, forall_const]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace' {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
simp_rw [cauchy_iff_le (uniformSpace := _), iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff]
lemma cauchy_comap_uniformSpace {u : UniformSpace β} {α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := comap f u) l ↔ Cauchy (map f l) := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap]
rfl
lemma cauchy_prod_iff [UniformSpace β] {F : Filter (α × β)} :
Cauchy F ↔ Cauchy (map Prod.fst F) ∧ Cauchy (map Prod.snd F) := by
simp_rw [instUniformSpaceProd, ← cauchy_comap_uniformSpace, ← cauchy_inf_uniformSpace]
theorem Cauchy.prod [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} (hf : Cauchy f) (hg : Cauchy g) :
Cauchy (f ×ˢ g) := by
have := hf.1; have := hg.1
simpa [cauchy_prod_iff, hf.1] using ⟨hf, hg⟩
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`SequentiallyComplete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : Filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
intro s hs
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩
apply mem_of_superset t_mem
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact fun z hz => hU (prodMk_mem_compRel hxy (ht <| mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) (adhs : ClusterPt x f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s := (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs
use t, t_mem, ht
exact forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem))
theorem le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ClusterPt x f :=
⟨fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.map [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : UniformContinuous m) : Cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc
map m f ×ˢ map m f = map (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := Filter.prod_map_map_eq
_ ≤ Filter.map (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 α) := map_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := hm⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.comap [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) [NeBot (comap m f)] :
Cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc
comap m f ×ˢ comap m f = comap (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := prod_comap_comap_eq
_ ≤ comap (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 β) := comap_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 α := hm⟩
theorem Cauchy.comap' [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : Filter.comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(_ : NeBot (Filter.comap m f)) : Cauchy (Filter.comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def CauchySeq [Preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
Cauchy (atTop.map u)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_uniformity [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) := by
simpa only [Tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using h.right
theorem CauchySeq.nonempty [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : Nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_neBot _ _ <| (map_neBot_iff _).1 hu.1
theorem CauchySeq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V := by
haveI := h.nonempty
have := h.tendsto_uniformity; rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at this
simpa [MapsTo] using atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchySeq [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) : CauchySeq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
theorem cauchySeq_const [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (x : α) : CauchySeq fun _ : β => x :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchySeq
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans <| by simp only [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
theorem CauchySeq.comp_tendsto {γ} [Preorder β] [SemilatticeSup γ] [Nonempty γ] {f : β → α}
(hf : CauchySeq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) : CauchySeq (f ∘ g) :=
⟨inferInstance, le_trans (prod_le_prod.mpr ⟨Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg, Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg⟩) hf.2⟩
theorem CauchySeq.comp_injective [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] [Nonempty β] {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f : β → ℕ} (hf : Injective f) : CauchySeq (u ∘ f) :=
hu.comp_tendsto <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hf.tendsto_cofinite.mono_left atTop_le_cofinite
theorem Function.Bijective.cauchySeq_comp_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Bijective f) (u : ℕ → α) :
CauchySeq (u ∘ f) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp_injective hf.injective⟩
lift f to ℕ ≃ ℕ using hf
simpa only [Function.comp_def, f.apply_symm_apply] using H.comp_injective f.symm.injective
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto] at hu
exact ((hu.comp <| hf.prod_atTop hg).comp tendsto_atTop_diagonal).subseq_mem hV
-- todo: generalize this and other lemmas to a nonempty semilattice
theorem cauchySeq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, k ∈ Prod.map u u ⁻¹' V :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto
theorem cauchySeq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V := by
simp only [cauchySeq_iff', Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self', mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
theorem CauchySeq.prodMap {γ δ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq (Prod.map u v) := by
simpa only [CauchySeq, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using hu.prod hv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod_map := CauchySeq.prodMap
theorem CauchySeq.prodMk {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {u : γ → α} {v : γ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq fun x => (u x, v x) :=
haveI := hu.1.of_map
(Cauchy.prod hu hv).mono (tendsto_map.prodMk tendsto_map)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod := CauchySeq.prodMk
theorem CauchySeq.eventually_eventually [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, (u k, u l) ∈ V :=
eventually_atTop_curry <| hu.tendsto_uniformity hV
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_cauchySeq {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) {u : γ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : CauchySeq (f ∘ u) :=
hu.map hf
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V n := by
have : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ k, (u l, u k) ∈ V n := fun n => by
rw [cauchySeq_iff] at hu
rcases hu _ (hV n) with ⟨N, H⟩
exact ⟨N, fun k hk l hl => H _ (le_trans hk hl) _ hk⟩
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : StrictMono φ, hφ : ∀ n, ∀ l ≥ φ n, (u l, u <| φ n) ∈ V n⟩ :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually' this
exact ⟨φ, φ_extr, fun n => hφ _ _ (φ_extr <| Nat.lt_add_one n).le⟩
theorem Filter.Tendsto.subseq_mem_entourage {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
{a : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ (u (φ 0), a) ∈ V 0 ∧
∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V (n + 1) := by
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 (hu (ball_mem_nhds a (symm_le_uniformity <| hV 0))) with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases (hu.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat n)).cauchySeq.subseq_mem fun n => hV (n + 1) with
⟨φ, φ_mono, hφV⟩
exact ⟨fun k => φ k + n, φ_mono.add_const _, hn _ le_add_self, hφV⟩
/-- If a Cauchy sequence has a convergent subsequence, then it converges. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {p : Filter ι} [NeBot p] (hf : Tendsto f p atTop) {a : α}
(ha : Tendsto (u ∘ f) p (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hu (ha.mapClusterPt.of_comp hf)
/-- Any shift of a Cauchy sequence is also a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_shift {u : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : CauchySeq (fun n ↦ u (n + k)) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [cauchySeq_iff] at h ⊢
intro V mV
obtain ⟨N, h⟩ := h V mV
use N + k
intro a ha b hb
convert h (a - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le ha) (b - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le hb) <;> omega
· exact h.comp_tendsto (tendsto_add_atTop_nat k)
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {p : γ → Prop}
{s : γ → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ s i := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, ← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
refine (atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_iff h).trans ?_
simp only [exists_prop, true_and, MapsTo, preimage, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_Ici, and_imp, Prod.map, @forall_swap (_ ≤ _) β]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff' {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → Set (α × α)} (H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, (u n, u N) ∈ s i := by
refine H.cauchySeq_iff.trans ⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· exact (h i hi).imp fun N hN n hn => hN n hn N le_rfl
· rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity (H.mem_of_mem hi) with ⟨t, ht, ht', hts⟩
rcases H.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨j, hj, hjt⟩
refine (h j hj).imp fun N hN m hm n hn => hts ⟨u N, hjt ?_, ht' <| hjt ?_⟩
exacts [hN m hm, hN n hn]
theorem cauchySeq_of_controlled [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (U : β → Set (α × α))
(hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) {f : β → α}
(hf : ∀ ⦃N m n : β⦄, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto.2
(by
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets]
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hU s hs
refine ⟨(N, N), fun mn hmn => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, n⟩ := mn
exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2))
theorem isComplete_iff_clusterPt {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l, Cauchy l → l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l :=
forall₃_congr fun _ hl _ => exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ =>
le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy hl
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ↑l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine ⟨fun h l => h l, fun H => isComplete_iff_clusterPt.2 fun l hl hls => ?_⟩
haveI := hl.1
rcases H (Ultrafilter.of l) hl.ultrafilter_of ((Ultrafilter.of_le l).trans hls) with ⟨x, hxs, hxl⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, (ClusterPt.of_le_nhds hxl).mono (Ultrafilter.of_le l)⟩
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter' {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → s ∈ l → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
isComplete_iff_ultrafilter.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
protected theorem IsComplete.union {s t : Set α} (hs : IsComplete s) (ht : IsComplete t) :
IsComplete (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [isComplete_iff_ultrafilter', Ultrafilter.union_mem_iff, or_imp] at *
exact fun l hl =>
⟨fun hsl => (hs l hl hsl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inl hx.1, hx.2⟩, fun htl =>
(ht l hl htl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inr hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩
theorem isComplete_iUnion_separated {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, IsComplete (s i))
{U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) (hd : ∀ (i j : ι), ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s j, (x, y) ∈ U → i = j) :
IsComplete (⋃ i, s i) := by
set S := ⋃ i, s i
intro l hl hls
rw [le_principal_iff] at hls
obtain ⟨hl_ne, hl'⟩ := cauchy_iff.1 hl
obtain ⟨t, htS, htl, htU⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ S ∧ t ∈ l ∧ t ×ˢ t ⊆ U := by
rcases hl' U hU with ⟨t, htl, htU⟩
refine ⟨t ∩ S, inter_subset_right, inter_mem htl hls, Subset.trans ?_ htU⟩
gcongr <;> apply inter_subset_left
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, t ⊆ s i := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem htl with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hx) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, fun y hy => ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hy) with ⟨j, hj⟩
rwa [hd i j x hi y hj (htU <| mk_mem_prod hx hy)]
rcases hs i l hl (le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_of_superset htl hi) with ⟨x, hxs, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hxs⟩, hlx⟩
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class CompleteSpace (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Prop where
/-- In a complete uniform space, every Cauchy filter converges. -/
complete : ∀ {f : Filter α}, Cauchy f → ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem complete_univ {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompleteSpace α] :
IsComplete (univ : Set α) := fun f hf _ => by
rcases CompleteSpace.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_univ x, hx⟩
instance CompleteSpace.prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace α] [CompleteSpace β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_fst
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_snd
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod]; constructor <;> assumption⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.fst_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace α where
complete hf :=
let ⟨y⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.prod <| cauchy_pure (a := y)
⟨a, by simpa only [map_fst_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.fst) hab⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.snd_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty α] :
CompleteSpace β where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| (cauchy_pure (a := x)).prod hf
⟨b, by simpa only [map_snd_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.snd) hab⟩
lemma completeSpace_prod_of_nonempty [UniformSpace β] [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) ↔ CompleteSpace α ∧ CompleteSpace β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨.fst_of_prod (β := β), .snd_of_prod (α := α)⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ .prod⟩
@[to_additive]
instance CompleteSpace.mulOpposite [CompleteSpace α] : CompleteSpace αᵐᵒᵖ where
complete hf :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.exists.mpr <|
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete (hf.map MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop)
⟨x, (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hx).trans_eq <| MulOpposite.comap_unop_nhds _⟩
/-- If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
theorem completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ (h : IsComplete (univ : Set α)) : CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h _ hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top); ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ : CompleteSpace α ↔ IsComplete (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@complete_univ α _, completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_ultrafilter :
CompleteSpace α ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ∃ x : α, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, isComplete_iff_ultrafilter]
theorem cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∃ x, l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨CompleteSpace.complete, fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => cauchy_nhds.mono hx⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ ∃ x, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds
/-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete [Preorder β] [CompleteSpace α] {u : β → α}
(H : CauchySeq u) : ∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) :=
CompleteSpace.complete H
/-- If `K` is a complete subset, then any cauchy sequence in `K` converges to a point in `K` -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete [Preorder β] {K : Set α} (h₁ : IsComplete K)
{u : β → α} (h₂ : ∀ n, u n ∈ K) (h₃ : CauchySeq u) : ∃ v ∈ K, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 v) :=
h₁ _ h₃ <| le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_map_iff_exists_image.2
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [image_univ, range_subset_iff]⟩
theorem Cauchy.le_nhds_lim [CompleteSpace α] {f : Filter α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
haveI := hf.1.nonempty; f ≤ 𝓝 (lim f) :=
_root_.le_nhds_lim (CompleteSpace.complete hf)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_limUnder [Preorder β] [CompleteSpace α] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
haveI := h.1.nonempty; Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 <| limUnder atTop u) :=
h.le_nhds_lim
theorem IsClosed.isComplete [CompleteSpace α] {s : Set α} (h : IsClosed s) : IsComplete s :=
fun _ cf fs =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete cf
⟨x, isClosed_iff_clusterPt.mp h x (cf.left.mono (le_inf hx fs)), hx⟩
/-- A set `s` is totally bounded if for every entourage `d` there is a finite
set of points `t` such that every element of `s` is `d`-near to some element of `t`. -/
def TotallyBounded (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d }
theorem TotallyBounded.exists_subset {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) {U : Set (α × α)}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ U } := by
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hU with ⟨r, hr, rs, rU⟩
rcases hs r hr with ⟨k, fk, ks⟩
let u := k ∩ { y | ∃ x ∈ s, (x, y) ∈ r }
choose f hfs hfr using fun x : u => x.coe_prop.2
refine ⟨range f, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact range_subset_iff.2 hfs
· haveI : Fintype u := (fk.inter_of_left _).fintype
exact finite_range f
· intro x xs
obtain ⟨y, hy, xy⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 (ks xs)
rw [biUnion_range, mem_iUnion]
set z : ↥u := ⟨y, hy, ⟨x, xs, xy⟩⟩
exact ⟨z, rU <| mem_compRel.2 ⟨y, xy, rs (hfr z)⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff_subset {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔
∀ d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d } :=
⟨fun H _ hd ↦ H.exists_subset hd, fun H d hd ↦ let ⟨t, _, ht⟩ := H d hd; ⟨t, ht⟩⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.totallyBounded_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t : Set α, Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ U i } :=
H.forall_iff fun _ _ hUV h =>
h.imp fun _ ht => ⟨ht.1, ht.2.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ hy => hUV hy⟩
theorem totallyBounded_of_forall_symm {s : Set α}
(h : ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsSymmetricRel V → ∃ t : Set α, Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y V) :
TotallyBounded s :=
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.totallyBounded_iff.2 fun V hV => by
simpa only [ball_eq_of_symmetry hV.2] using h V hV.1 hV.2
theorem TotallyBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h : TotallyBounded s₂) :
TotallyBounded s₁ := fun d hd =>
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h d hd
⟨t, ht₁, Subset.trans hs ht₂⟩
/-- The closure of a totally bounded set is totally bounded. -/
theorem TotallyBounded.closure {s : Set α} (h : TotallyBounded s) : TotallyBounded (closure s) :=
uniformity_hasBasis_closed.totallyBounded_iff.2 fun V hV =>
let ⟨t, htf, hst⟩ := h V hV.1
⟨t, htf, closure_minimal hst <| htf.isClosed_biUnion fun _ _ => hV.2.preimage (.prodMk_left _)⟩
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_closure {s : Set α} : TotallyBounded (closure s) ↔ TotallyBounded s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.subset subset_closure, TotallyBounded.closure⟩
/-- A finite indexed union is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
TotallyBounded (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, TotallyBounded (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ h.subset (subset_iUnion _ _), fun h U hU ↦ ?_⟩
choose t htf ht using (h · U hU)
refine ⟨⋃ i, t i, finite_iUnion htf, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_iUnion]
gcongr; apply ht
/-- A union indexed by a finite set is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
lemma totallyBounded_biUnion {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set α} :
TotallyBounded (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, TotallyBounded (s i) := by
have := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, totallyBounded_iUnion, Subtype.forall]
/-- A union of a finite family of sets is totally bounded
if and only if each set of the family is totally bounded. -/
lemma totallyBounded_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) :
TotallyBounded (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, TotallyBounded s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, totallyBounded_biUnion hS]
/-- A finite set is totally bounded. -/
lemma Set.Finite.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : TotallyBounded s := fun _U hU ↦
⟨s, hs, fun _x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx <| refl_mem_uniformity hU⟩
/-- A subsingleton is totally bounded. -/
lemma Set.Subsingleton.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
TotallyBounded s :=
hs.finite.totallyBounded
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_singleton (a : α) : TotallyBounded {a} := (finite_singleton a).totallyBounded
@[simp]
theorem totallyBounded_empty : TotallyBounded (∅ : Set α) := finite_empty.totallyBounded
/-- The union of two sets is totally bounded
if and only if each of the two sets is totally bounded. -/
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_union {s t : Set α} :
TotallyBounded (s ∪ t) ↔ TotallyBounded s ∧ TotallyBounded t := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, totallyBounded_iUnion]
simp [and_comm]
/-- The union of two totally bounded sets is totally bounded. -/
protected lemma TotallyBounded.union {s t : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s) (ht : TotallyBounded t) :
TotallyBounded (s ∪ t) :=
totallyBounded_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
lemma totallyBounded_insert (a : α) {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded (insert a s) ↔ TotallyBounded s := by
simp_rw [← singleton_union, totallyBounded_union, totallyBounded_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, TotallyBounded.insert⟩ := totallyBounded_insert
/-- The image of a totally bounded set under a uniformly continuous map is totally bounded. -/
theorem TotallyBounded.image [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : TotallyBounded s)
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : TotallyBounded (f '' s) := fun t ht =>
have : { p : α × α | (f p.1, f p.2) ∈ t } ∈ 𝓤 α := hf ht
let ⟨c, hfc, hct⟩ := hs _ this
⟨f '' c, hfc.image f, by
simp only [mem_image, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and', iUnion_iUnion_eq_right, image_subset_iff,
preimage_iUnion, preimage_setOf_eq]
simp? [subset_def] at hct says
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, subset_def, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hct
intro x hx
simpa using hct x hx⟩
theorem Ultrafilter.cauchy_of_totallyBounded {s : Set α} (f : Ultrafilter α) (hs : TotallyBounded s)
(h : ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s) : Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
⟨f.neBot', fun _ ht =>
let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'_symm, ht'_t⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht
let ⟨i, hi, hs_union⟩ := hs t' ht'₁
have : (⋃ y ∈ i, { x | (x, y) ∈ t' }) ∈ f := mem_of_superset (le_principal_iff.mp h) hs_union
have : ∃ y ∈ i, { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ∈ f := (Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hi).1 this
let ⟨y, _, hif⟩ := this
have : { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ×ˢ { x | (x, y) ∈ t' } ⊆ compRel t' t' :=
fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨(h₁ : (_, y) ∈ t'), (h₂ : (_, y) ∈ t')⟩ => ⟨y, h₁, ht'_symm h₂⟩
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hif hif) (Subset.trans this ht'_t)⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff_filter {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ f, NeBot f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ c ≤ f, Cauchy c := by
constructor
· exact fun H f hf hfs => ⟨Ultrafilter.of f, Ultrafilter.of_le f,
(Ultrafilter.of f).cauchy_of_totallyBounded H ((Ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩
· intro H d hd
contrapose! H with hd_cover
set f := ⨅ t : Finset α, 𝓟 (s \ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d })
have hb : HasAntitoneBasis f fun t : Finset α ↦ s \ ⋃ y ∈ t, { x | (x, y) ∈ d } :=
.iInf_principal fun _ _ ↦ diff_subset_diff_right ∘ biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
have : Filter.NeBot f := hb.1.neBot_iff.2 fun _ ↦
diff_nonempty.2 <| hd_cover _ (Finset.finite_toSet _)
have : f ≤ 𝓟 s := iInf_le_of_le ∅ (by simp)
refine ⟨f, ‹_›, ‹_›, fun c hcf hc => ?_⟩
rcases mem_prod_same_iff.1 (hc.2 hd) with ⟨m, hm, hmd⟩
rcases hc.1.nonempty_of_mem hm with ⟨y, hym⟩
have : s \ {x | (x, y) ∈ d} ∈ c := by simpa using hcf (hb.mem {y})
rcases hc.1.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hm this) with ⟨z, hzm, -, hyz⟩
exact hyz (hmd ⟨hzm, hym⟩)
theorem totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter α, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → Cauchy (f : Filter α) := by
refine ⟨fun hs f => f.cauchy_of_totallyBounded hs, fun H => totallyBounded_iff_filter.2 ?_⟩
intro f hf hfs
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.of f, Ultrafilter.of_le f, H _ ((Ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩
theorem isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete {s : Set α} :
IsCompact s ↔ TotallyBounded s ∧ IsComplete s :=
⟨fun hs =>
⟨totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf =>
let ⟨_, _, fx⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.1 hs f hf
cauchy_nhds.mono fx,
fun f fc fs =>
let ⟨a, as, fa⟩ := @hs f fc.1 fs
⟨a, as, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp fc fa⟩⟩,
fun ⟨ht, hc⟩ =>
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2 fun f hf =>
hc _ (totallyBounded_iff_ultrafilter.1 ht f hf) hf⟩
protected theorem IsCompact.totallyBounded {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : TotallyBounded s :=
(isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 h).1
protected theorem IsCompact.isComplete {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : IsComplete s :=
(isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 h).2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) complete_of_compact {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompactSpace α] :
CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => by simpa using (isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete.1 isCompact_univ).2 _ hf⟩
theorem isCompact_of_totallyBounded_isClosed [CompleteSpace α] {s : Set α} (ht : TotallyBounded s)
(hc : IsClosed s) : IsCompact s :=
(@isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete α _ s).2 ⟨ht, hc.isComplete⟩
/-- Every Cauchy sequence over `ℕ` is totally bounded. -/
theorem CauchySeq.totallyBounded_range {s : ℕ → α} (hs : CauchySeq s) :
TotallyBounded (range s) := by
intro a ha
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cauchySeq_iff.1 hs a ha
refine ⟨s '' { k | k ≤ n }, (finite_le_nat _).image _, ?_⟩
rw [range_subset_iff, biUnion_image]
intro m
rw [mem_iUnion₂]
rcases le_total m n with hm | hm
exacts [⟨m, hm, refl_mem_uniformity ha⟩, ⟨n, le_refl n, hn m hm n le_rfl⟩]
/-- Given a family of points `xs n`, a family of entourages `V n` of the diagonal and a family of
natural numbers `u n`, the intersection over `n` of the `V n`-neighborhood of `xs 1, ..., xs (u n)`.
Designed to be relatively compact when `V n` tends to the diagonal. -/
def interUnionBalls (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) (V : ℕ → Set (α × α)) : Set α :=
⋂ n, ⋃ m ≤ u n, UniformSpace.ball (xs m) (Prod.swap ⁻¹' V n)
lemma totallyBounded_interUnionBalls {p : ℕ → Prop} {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)}
(H : (uniformity α).HasBasis p U) (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) :
TotallyBounded (interUnionBalls xs u U) := by
rw [Filter.HasBasis.totallyBounded_iff H]
intro i _
have h_subset : interUnionBalls xs u U
⊆ ⋃ m ≤ u i, UniformSpace.ball (xs m) (Prod.swap ⁻¹' U i) :=
fun x hx ↦ Set.mem_iInter.1 hx i
classical
refine ⟨Finset.image xs (Finset.range (u i + 1)), Finset.finite_toSet _, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_range, mem_image, mem_Iio, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and',
iUnion_iUnion_eq_right, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact h_subset hx
/-- The construction `interUnionBalls` is used to have a relatively compact set. -/
theorem isCompact_closure_interUnionBalls {p : ℕ → Prop} {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)}
(H : (uniformity α).HasBasis p U) [CompleteSpace α] (xs : ℕ → α) (u : ℕ → ℕ) :
IsCompact (closure (interUnionBalls xs u U)) := by
rw [isCompact_iff_totallyBounded_isComplete]
refine ⟨TotallyBounded.closure ?_, isClosed_closure.isComplete⟩
exact totallyBounded_interUnionBalls H xs u
/-!
### Sequentially complete space
In this section we prove that a uniform space is complete provided that it is sequentially complete
(i.e., any Cauchy sequence converges) and its uniformity filter admits a countable generating set.
In particular, this applies to (e)metric spaces, see the files `Topology/MetricSpace/EmetricSpace`
and `Topology/MetricSpace/Basic`.
More precisely, we assume that there is a sequence of entourages `U_n` such that any other
entourage includes one of `U_n`. Then any Cauchy filter `f` generates a decreasing sequence of
sets `s_n ∈ f` such that `s_n × s_n ⊆ U_n`. Choose a sequence `x_n∈s_n`. It is easy to show
that this is a Cauchy sequence. If this sequence converges to some `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/
namespace SequentiallyComplete
variable {f : Filter α} (hf : Cauchy f) {U : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α)
open Set Finset
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence of sets approximating a Cauchy filter. -/
def setSeqAux (n : ℕ) : { s : Set α // s ∈ f ∧ s ×ˢ s ⊆ U n } :=
Classical.indefiniteDescription _ <| (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 (U n) (U_mem n)
/-- Given a Cauchy filter `f` and a sequence `U` of entourages, `set_seq` provides
an antitone sequence of sets `s n ∈ f` such that `s n ×ˢ s n ⊆ U`. -/
def setSeq (n : ℕ) : Set α :=
⋂ m ∈ Set.Iic n, (setSeqAux hf U_mem m).val
theorem setSeq_mem (n : ℕ) : setSeq hf U_mem n ∈ f :=
(biInter_mem (finite_le_nat n)).2 fun m _ => (setSeqAux hf U_mem m).2.1
theorem setSeq_mono ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ setSeq hf U_mem m :=
biInter_subset_biInter_left <| Iic_subset_Iic.2 h
theorem setSeq_sub_aux (n : ℕ) : setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ setSeqAux hf U_mem n :=
biInter_subset_of_mem right_mem_Iic
theorem setSeq_prod_subset {N m n} (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) :
setSeq hf U_mem m ×ˢ setSeq hf U_mem n ⊆ U N := fun p hp => by
refine (setSeqAux hf U_mem N).2.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> apply setSeq_sub_aux
· exact setSeq_mono hf U_mem hm hp.1
· exact setSeq_mono hf U_mem hn hp.2
| /-- A sequence of points such that `seq n ∈ setSeq n`. Here `setSeq` is an antitone
sequence of sets `setSeq n ∈ f` with diameters controlled by a given sequence
of entourages. -/
def seq (n : ℕ) : α :=
(hf.1.nonempty_of_mem (setSeq_mem hf U_mem n)).choose
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 722 | 726 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Lean.Meta.CongrTheorems
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Lemmas about units in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
We also define `Ring.inverse`, a globally defined function on any ring
(in fact any `MonoidWithZero`), which inverts units and sends non-units to zero.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered Equiv Subtype.restrict Multiplicative
variable {α M₀ G₀ : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Units
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero monoid with zero represented as an element
of the monoid is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] (u : M₀ˣ) : (u : M₀) ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one u.mul_inv
-- We can't use `mul_eq_zero` + `Units.ne_zero` in the next two lemmas because we don't assume
-- `Nonzero M₀`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : a * u = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_left h ↑u⁻¹, fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h u⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : ↑u * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_right (↑u⁻¹) h, mul_eq_zero_of_right (u : M₀)⟩
end Units
namespace IsUnit
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] {a : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.ne_zero
theorem mul_right_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a * b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.mul_right_eq_zero
theorem mul_left_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (hb : IsUnit b) : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hb
hu ▸ u.mul_left_eq_zero
end IsUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_zero_iff : IsUnit (0 : M₀) ↔ (0 : M₀) = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, a, (a0 : 0 * a = 1), _⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [zero_mul] at a0, fun h =>
@isUnit_of_subsingleton _ _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) 0⟩
theorem not_isUnit_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : ¬IsUnit (0 : M₀) :=
mt isUnit_zero_iff.1 zero_ne_one
namespace Ring
open Classical in
/-- Introduce a function `inverse` on a monoid with zero `M₀`, which sends `x` to `x⁻¹` if `x` is
invertible and to `0` otherwise. This definition is somewhat ad hoc, but one needs a fully (rather
than partially) defined inverse function for some purposes, including for calculus.
Note that while this is in the `Ring` namespace for brevity, it requires the weaker assumption
`MonoidWithZero M₀` instead of `Ring M₀`. -/
noncomputable def inverse : M₀ → M₀ := fun x => if h : IsUnit x then ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) else 0
/-- By definition, if `x` is invertible then `inverse x = x⁻¹`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_unit (u : M₀ˣ) : inverse (u : M₀) = (u⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) := by
rw [inverse, dif_pos u.isUnit, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
theorem inverse_of_isUnit {x : M₀} (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x = ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) := dif_pos h
/-- By definition, if `x` is not invertible then `inverse x = 0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_non_unit (x : M₀) (h : ¬IsUnit x) : inverse x = 0 :=
dif_neg h
theorem mul_inverse_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * inverse x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.mul_inv]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.inv_mul]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * x * inverse x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * inverse x * x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * (inverse x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * (x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * y = z ↔ y = x * z :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_left _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_left _ _ h]⟩
theorem eq_mul_inverse_iff_mul_eq (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit z) : x = y * inverse z ↔ x * z = y :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_right _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_right _ _ h]⟩
variable (M₀)
@[simp]
theorem inverse_one : inverse (1 : M₀) = 1 :=
inverse_unit 1
@[simp]
theorem inverse_zero : inverse (0 : M₀) = 0 := by
nontriviality
exact inverse_non_unit _ not_isUnit_zero
variable {M₀}
end Ring
theorem IsUnit.ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit a → IsUnit (Ring.inverse a)
| ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ ⟨u⁻¹, (Ring.inverse_unit u).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias IsUnit.ring_inverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] protected alias Ring.IsUnit.ringInverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit (Ring.inverse a) ↔ IsUnit a :=
⟨fun h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial M₀
· convert h
· contrapose h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h]
exact not_isUnit_zero
,
IsUnit.ringInverse⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias isUnit_ring_inverse := isUnit_ringInverse
namespace Units
variable [GroupWithZero G₀]
/-- Embed a non-zero element of a `GroupWithZero` into the unit group.
By combining this function with the operations on units,
or the `/ₚ` operation, it is possible to write a division
as a partial function with three arguments. -/
def mk0 (a : G₀) (ha : a ≠ 0) : G₀ˣ :=
⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk0_one (h := one_ne_zero) : mk0 (1 : G₀) h = 1 := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_mk0 {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : (mk0 a h : G₀) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk0_val (u : G₀ˣ) (h : (u : G₀) ≠ 0) : mk0 (u : G₀) h = u :=
Units.ext rfl
theorem mul_inv' (u : G₀ˣ) : u * (u : G₀)⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
theorem inv_mul' (u : G₀ˣ) : (u⁻¹ : G₀) * u = 1 :=
inv_mul_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk0_inj {a b : G₀} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : Units.mk0 a ha = Units.mk0 b hb ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h => Units.ext h⟩
/-- In a group with zero, an existential over a unit can be rewritten in terms of `Units.mk0`. -/
theorem exists0 {p : G₀ˣ → Prop} : (∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g) ↔ ∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p (Units.mk0 g hg) :=
⟨fun ⟨g, pg⟩ => ⟨g, g.ne_zero, (g.mk0_val g.ne_zero).symm ▸ pg⟩,
fun ⟨g, hg, pg⟩ => ⟨Units.mk0 g hg, pg⟩⟩
/-- An alternative version of `Units.exists0`. This one is useful if Lean cannot
figure out `p` when using `Units.exists0` from right to left. -/
theorem exists0' {p : ∀ g : G₀, g ≠ 0 → Prop} :
(∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p g hg) ↔ ∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g g.ne_zero :=
Iff.trans (by simp_rw [val_mk0]) exists0.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_iff_ne_zero {p : G₀ → Prop} : (∃ u : G₀ˣ, p u) ↔ ∃ x ≠ 0, p x := by
simp [exists0]
theorem _root_.GroupWithZero.eq_zero_or_unit (a : G₀) : a = 0 ∨ ∃ u : G₀ˣ, a = u := by
simpa using em _
end Units
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b c : G₀} {m n : ℕ}
theorem IsUnit.mk0 (x : G₀) (hx : x ≠ 0) : IsUnit x :=
(Units.mk0 x hx).isUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff_ne_zero : IsUnit a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(Units.exists_iff_ne_zero (p := (· = a))).trans (by simp)
alias ⟨_, Ne.isUnit⟩ := isUnit_iff_ne_zero
-- Porting note: can't add this attribute?
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/740
-- attribute [protected] Ne.is_unit
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @fun a b h => by
contrapose! h
exact (Units.mk0 a h.1 * Units.mk0 b h.2).ne_zero }
-- Can't be put next to the other `mk0` lemmas because it depends on the
-- `NoZeroDivisors` instance, which depends on `mk0`.
@[simp]
theorem Units.mk0_mul (x y : G₀) (hxy) :
Units.mk0 (x * y) hxy =
Units.mk0 x (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hxy).1 * Units.mk0 y (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hxy).2 := by
ext; rfl
theorem div_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≠ 0 := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_ne_zero ha (inv_ne_zero hb)
@[simp]
theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem div_ne_zero_iff : a / b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
div_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
@[simp] lemma div_self (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := h.isUnit.div_self
lemma eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
hc.isUnit.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq
lemma eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
hb.isUnit.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq
lemma inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
ha.isUnit.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul
lemma mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
hb.isUnit.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
lemma mul_inv_eq_one₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := hb.isUnit.mul_inv_eq_one
lemma inv_mul_eq_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := ha.isUnit.inv_mul_eq_one
lemma mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ := hb.isUnit.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv
lemma mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := ha.isUnit.mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq
/-- A variant of `eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by
rwa [← eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀]; rintro rfl; simp [ha] at h
/-- A variant of `eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by
rwa [← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hb] at h
/-- A variant of `inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by
rwa [← inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hc.symm] at h
/-- A variant of `mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by
rwa [← mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hb.symm] at h
@[simp] lemma div_mul_cancel₀ (a : G₀) (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b = a := h.isUnit.div_mul_cancel _
lemma mul_one_div_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a * (1 / a) = 1 := h.isUnit.mul_one_div_cancel
lemma one_div_mul_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : 1 / a * a = 1 := h.isUnit.one_div_mul_cancel
lemma div_left_inj' (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c = b / c ↔ a = b := hc.isUnit.div_left_inj
@[field_simps] lemma div_eq_iff (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := hb.isUnit.div_eq_iff
@[field_simps] lemma eq_div_iff (hb : b ≠ 0) : c = a / b ↔ c * b = a := hb.isUnit.eq_div_iff
-- TODO: Swap RHS around
lemma div_eq_iff_mul_eq (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = c ↔ c * b = a := hb.isUnit.div_eq_iff.trans eq_comm
lemma eq_div_iff_mul_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) : a = b / c ↔ a * c = b := hc.isUnit.eq_div_iff
lemma div_eq_of_eq_mul (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = c * b → a / b = c := hb.isUnit.div_eq_of_eq_mul
lemma eq_div_of_mul_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c = b → a = b / c := hc.isUnit.eq_div_of_mul_eq
lemma div_eq_one_iff_eq (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b := hb.isUnit.div_eq_one_iff_eq
lemma div_mul_cancel_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : b / (a * b) = a⁻¹ :=
hb.isUnit.div_mul_cancel_right _
lemma mul_div_mul_right (a b : G₀) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c / (b * c) = a / b :=
hc.isUnit.mul_div_mul_right _ _
-- TODO: Duplicate of `mul_inv_cancel_right₀`
lemma mul_mul_div (a : G₀) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = a * b * (1 / b) := (hb.isUnit.mul_mul_div _).symm
lemma div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) (a b : G₀) : a / c / (b / c) = a / b := by
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
| lemma div_mul_div_cancel₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b * (b / c) = a / c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hb]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Basic.lean | 326 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The short complexes attached to homological complexes
In this file, we define a functor
`shortComplexFunctor C c i : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C`.
By definition, the image of a homological complex `K` by this functor
is the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`.
The homology `K.homology i` of a homological complex `K` in degree `i` is defined as
the homology of the short complex `(shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K`, which can be
abbreviated as `K.sc i`.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexFunctor' (i j k : ι) : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj K := ShortComplex.mk (K.d i j) (K.d j k) (K.d_comp_d i j k)
map f :=
{ τ₁ := f.f i
τ₂ := f.f j
τ₃ := f.f k }
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def shortComplexFunctor (i : ι) :=
shortComplexFunctor' C c (c.prev i) i (c.next i)
/-- The natural isomorphism `shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k`
when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def natIsoSc' (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => ShortComplex.isoMk (K.XIsoOfEq hi) (Iso.refl _) (K.XIsoOfEq hk)
(by simp) (by simp)) (by aesop_cat)
variable {C c}
variable (K L M : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M) (i j k : ι)
/-- The short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
abbrev sc' := (shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).obj K
/-- The short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
noncomputable abbrev sc := (shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoSc' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k := (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk).app K
/-- A homological complex `K` has homology in degree `i` if the associated
short complex `K.sc i` has. -/
abbrev HasHomology := (K.sc i).HasHomology
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The homology in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homology := (K.sc i).homology
/-- The cycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def cycles := (K.sc i).cycles
/-- The inclusion of the cycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : K.cycles i ⟶ K.X i := (K.sc i).iCycles
/-- The homology class map from cycles to the homology of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homologyπ : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i := (K.sc i).homologyπ
variable {i}
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def liftCycles {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
(K.sc i).liftCycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev liftCycles' {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel i j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
K.liftCycles k j (c.next_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_i {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ K.iCycles i = k := by
dsimp [liftCycles, iCycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def toCycles [K.HasHomology j] :
K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
K.liftCycles (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_d : K.iCycles i ≫ K.d i j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
exact (K.sc i).iCycles_g
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, comp_zero]
/-- `K.cycles i` is the kernel of `K.d i j` when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIsKernel (hj : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.iCycles i) (K.iCycles_d i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hj
exact (K.sc i).cyclesIsKernel
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.d i j :=
liftCycles_i _ _ _ _ _
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
instance : Mono (K.iCycles i) := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi (K.homologyπ i) := by
dsimp only [homologyπ]
infer_instance
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_toCycles [K.HasHomology k] :
K.d i j ≫ K.toCycles j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles k), assoc, toCycles_i, d_comp_d, zero_comp]
variable {i j} in
lemma toCycles_eq_zero [K.HasHomology j] (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.toCycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), toCycles_i, zero_comp, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
@[reassoc]
lemma comp_liftCycles {A' A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (α : A' ⟶ A) :
α ≫ K.liftCycles k j hj hk = K.liftCycles (α ≫ k) j hj (by rw [assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), assoc, liftCycles_i]
@[reassoc]
lemma liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι)
(hj : c.next i = j) {i' : ι} (x : A ⟶ K.X i') (hx : k = x ≫ K.d i' i) :
K.liftCycles k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) ≫ K.homologyπ i = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i' i
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : liftCycles K k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, comp_zero] at hx
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), zero_comp, liftCycles_i, hx]
rw [this, zero_comp]
end
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_comp_homologyπ [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.homologyπ j = 0 :=
K.liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology j` is the cokernel of `K.toCycles i j : K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j`
when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.homologyπ j) (K.toCycles_comp_homologyπ i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc j).homologyIsCokernel
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The opcycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def opcycles := (K.sc i).opcycles
/-- The projection to the opcycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : K.X i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).pOpcycles
/-- The inclusion map of the homology of a homological complex into its opcycles. -/
noncomputable def homologyι : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).homologyι
variable {i}
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
(K.sc i).descOpcycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev descOpcycles' {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel j i)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
K.descOpcycles k j (c.prev_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj hk = k := by
dsimp [descOpcycles, pOpcycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles :
K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j :=
K.descOpcycles (K.d i j) (c.prev i) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_pOpcycles [K.HasHomology j] : K.d i j ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' hij
exact (K.sc j).f_pOpcycles
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, zero_comp]
/-- `K.opcycles j` is the cokernel of `K.d i j` when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.pOpcycles j) (K.d_pOpcycles i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact (K.sc j).opcyclesIsCokernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = K.d i j :=
p_descOpcycles _ _ _ _ _
instance : Epi (K.pOpcycles i) := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono (K.homologyι i) := by
dsimp only [homologyι]
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_d :
K.fromOpcycles i j ≫ K.d j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles_assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
variable {i j} in
lemma fromOpcycles_eq_zero (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles, comp_zero, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
@[reassoc]
lemma descOpcycles_comp {A A' : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) (α : A ⟶ A') :
K.descOpcycles k j hj hk ≫ α = K.descOpcycles (k ≫ α) j hj
(by rw [reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_descOpcycles_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι)
(hj : c.prev i = j) {i' : ι} (x : K.X i' ⟶ A) (hx : k = K.d i i' ≫ x) :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i i'
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, zero_comp] at hx
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), comp_zero, p_descOpcycles, hx]
rw [this, comp_zero]
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 :=
K.homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) _ rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology i` is the kernel of `K.fromOpcycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j`
when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsKernel (hi : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.homologyι i) (K.homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc i).homologyIsKernel
variable {K L M}
variable [L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
/-- The map `K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def homologyMap : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.iCycles i = K.iCycles i ≫ φ.f i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_i _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : K.pOpcycles i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i = φ.f i ≫ L.pOpcycles i :=
ShortComplex.p_opcyclesMap _
instance [Mono (φ.f i)] : Mono (cyclesMap φ i) := mono_of_mono_fac (cyclesMap_i φ i)
instance [Epi (φ.f i)] : Epi (opcyclesMap φ i) := epi_of_epi_fac (p_opcyclesMap φ i)
variable (K)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_id : homologyMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id : cyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id : opcyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_id _
variable {K}
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyMap_comp : homologyMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = homologyMap φ i ≫ homologyMap ψ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.homologyMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp : cyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ cyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [cyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.cyclesMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp : opcyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = opcyclesMap φ i ≫ opcyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [opcyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_comp]
variable (K L)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_zero : homologyMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero : cyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero : opcyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_zero _ _
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_naturality :
K.homologyπ i ≫ homologyMap φ i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.homologyπ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyπ_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_naturality :
homologyMap φ i ≫ L.homologyι i = K.homologyι i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyι_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homology_π_ι :
K.homologyπ i ≫ K.homologyι i = K.iCycles i ≫ K.pOpcycles i :=
(K.sc i).homology_π_ι
variable {i}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : L.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : L.d j i ≫ k = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
opcyclesMap φ i ≫ L.descOpcycles k j hj hk = K.descOpcycles (φ.f i ≫ k) j hj
(by rw [← φ.comm_assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_opcyclesMap_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_comp_cyclesMap {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ cyclesMap φ i = L.liftCycles (k ≫ φ.f i) j hj
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm, reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (L.iCycles i), assoc, cyclesMap_i, liftCycles_i_assoc, liftCycles_i]
section
variable (C c i)
attribute [local simp] homologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- The `i`th homology functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.homology i
map f := homologyMap f i
/-- The homology functor to graded objects. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def gradedHomologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ GradedObject ι C where
obj K i := K.homology i
map f i := homologyMap f i
/-- The `i`th cycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.cycles i
map f := cyclesMap f i
/-- The `i`th opcycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.opcycles i
map f := opcyclesMap f i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyπ i : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyπ [CategoryWithHomology C] :
cyclesFunctor C c i ⟶ homologyFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyπ i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyι i : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyι [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyι i
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ (K.sc i).homology`
for all homological complexes `K`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ≅
shortComplexFunctor C c i ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
Iso.refl _
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology j ≅ (K.sc' i j k).homology`
for all homological complexes `K` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso' [CategoryWithHomology C]
(hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
homologyFunctor C c j ≅
shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
homologyFunctorIso C c j ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) _
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (homologyFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (opcyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (cyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
end
end
section
variable (hj : c.next i = j) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology i]
include hj h
lemma isIso_iCycles : IsIso (K.iCycles i) := by
subst hj
exact ShortComplex.isIso_iCycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles i ≅ K.X i` when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def iCyclesIso : K.cycles i ≅ K.X i :=
have := K.isIso_iCycles i j hj h
asIso (K.iCycles i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.iCycles i ≫ (K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv ≫ K.iCycles i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyι : IsIso (K.homologyι i) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyι _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i`
when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyι : K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i :=
have := K.isIso_homologyι i j hj h
asIso (K.homologyι i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyι i ≫ (K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv ≫ K.homologyι i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (hi : c.prev j = i) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology j]
include hi h
lemma isIso_pOpcycles : IsIso (K.pOpcycles j) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact ShortComplex.isIso_pOpcycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.X j ≅ K.opCycles j` when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def pOpcyclesIso : K.X j ≅ K.opcycles j :=
have := K.isIso_pOpcycles i j hi h
asIso (K.pOpcycles j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.pOpcycles j ≫ (K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyπ : IsIso (K.homologyπ j) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyπ _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j`
when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyπ : K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j :=
have := K.isIso_homologyπ i j hi h
asIso (K.homologyπ j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyπ j ≫ (K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv ≫ K.homologyπ j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable {K L}
lemma epi_homologyMap_of_epi_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [Epi (φ.f i)] (hi : ∀ j, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Epi (homologyMap φ i) :=
((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).2
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms.infer_property (opcyclesMap φ i))
lemma mono_homologyMap_of_mono_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (j : ι)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [Mono (φ.f j)] (hj : ∀ i, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Mono (homologyMap φ j) :=
((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).1
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms.infer_property (cyclesMap φ j))
end
/-- A homological complex `K` is exact at `i` if the short complex `K.sc i` is exact. -/
def ExactAt := (K.sc i).Exact
lemma exactAt_iff :
K.ExactAt i ↔ (K.sc i).Exact := by rfl
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.of_iso (hK : K.ExactAt i) {L : HomologicalComplex C c} (e : K ≅ L) :
L.ExactAt i := by
rw [exactAt_iff] at hK ⊢
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapIso e) hK
lemma exactAt_iff' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.ExactAt j ↔ (K.sc' i j k).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_iso (K.isoSc' i j k hi hk)
lemma exactAt_iff_isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ IsZero (K.homology i) := by
dsimp [homology]
rw [exactAt_iff, ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] (h : K.ExactAt i) :
IsZero (K.homology i) := by
rwa [← exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
/-- A homological complex `K` is acyclic if it is exact at `i` for any `i`. -/
def Acyclic := ∀ i, K.ExactAt i
lemma acyclic_iff :
K.Acyclic ↔ ∀ i, K.ExactAt i := by rfl
lemma acyclic_of_isZero (hK : IsZero K) :
K.Acyclic := by
rw [acyclic_iff]
intro i
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂
exact (eval _ _ i).map_isZero hK
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
|
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(K L : ChainComplex C ℕ) (φ : K ⟶ L) [K.HasHomology 0]
instance isIso_homologyι₀ :
IsIso (K.homologyι 0) :=
K.isIso_homologyι 0 _ rfl (by simp)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/HomologicalComplex.lean | 640 | 646 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-!
# Determinant of a matrix
This file defines the determinant of a matrix, `Matrix.det`, and its essential properties.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.det`: the determinant of a square matrix, as a sum over permutations
- `Matrix.detRowAlternating`: the determinant, as an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix
## Main results
- `det_mul`: the determinant of `A * B` is the product of determinants
- `det_zero_of_row_eq`: the determinant is zero if there is a repeated row
- `det_block_diagonal`: the determinant of a block diagonal matrix is a product
of the blocks' determinants
## Implementation notes
It is possible to configure `simp` to compute determinants. See the file
`MathlibTest/matrix.lean` for some examples.
-/
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
/-- `det` is an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix. -/
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
/-- The determinant of a matrix given by the Leibniz formula. -/
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
theorem det_eq_detp_sub_detp (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = M.detp 1 - M.detp (-1) := by
rw [det_apply, ← Equiv.sum_comp (Equiv.inv (Perm n)), ← ofSign_disjUnion, sum_disjUnion]
simp_rw [inv_apply, sign_inv, sub_eq_add_neg, detp, ← sum_neg_distrib]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) <;>
rw [mem_ofSign.mp hσ, ← Equiv.prod_comp σ] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
obtain ⟨x, h3⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2)
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
| ext
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 94 | 94 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Cat.AsSmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.StructuredArrow.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.IsConnected
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Grothendieck
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Filtered.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.PUnit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Grothendieck
/-!
# Final and initial functors
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is final if for every `d : D`,
the comma category of morphisms `d ⟶ F.obj c` is connected.
Dually, a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial if for every `d : D`,
the comma category of morphisms `F.obj c ⟶ d` is connected.
We show that right adjoints are examples of final functors, while
left adjoints are examples of initial functors.
For final functors, we prove that the following three statements are equivalent:
1. `F : C ⥤ D` is final.
2. Every functor `G : D ⥤ E` has a colimit if and only if `F ⋙ G` does,
and these colimits are isomorphic via `colimit.pre G F`.
3. `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit`.
Starting at 1. we show (in `coconesEquiv`) that
the categories of cocones over `G : D ⥤ E` and over `F ⋙ G` are equivalent.
(In fact, via an equivalence which does not change the cocone point.)
This readily implies 2., as `comp_hasColimit`, `hasColimit_of_comp`, and `colimitIso`.
From 2. we can specialize to `G = coyoneda.obj (op d)` to obtain 3., as `colimitCompCoyonedaIso`.
From 3., we prove 1. directly in `final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit`.
Dually, we prove that if a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial, then any functor `G : D ⥤ E` has a
limit if and only if `F ⋙ G` does, and these limits are isomorphic via `limit.pre G F`.
In the end of the file, we characterize the finality of some important induced functors on the
(co)structured arrow category (`StructuredArrow.pre` and `CostructuredArrow.pre`) and on the
Grothendieck construction (`Grothendieck.pre` and `Grothendieck.map`).
## Naming
There is some discrepancy in the literature about naming; some say 'cofinal' instead of 'final'.
The explanation for this is that the 'co' prefix here is *not* the usual category-theoretic one
indicating duality, but rather indicating the sense of "along with".
## See also
In `CategoryTheory.Filtered.Final` we give additional equivalent conditions in the case that
`C` is filtered.
## Future work
Dualise condition 3 above and the implications 2 ⇒ 3 and 3 ⇒ 1 to initial functors.
## References
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/09WN
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/final+functor
* Borceux, Handbook of Categorical Algebra I, Section 2.11.
(Note he reverses the roles of definition and main result relative to here!)
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Functor
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
section ArbitraryUniverse
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is final if for every `d : D`, the comma category of morphisms `d ⟶ F.obj c`
is connected. -/
@[stacks 04E6]
class Final (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
out (d : D) : IsConnected (StructuredArrow d F)
attribute [instance] Final.out
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is initial if for every `d : D`, the comma category of morphisms
`F.obj c ⟶ d` is connected.
-/
class Initial (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
out (d : D) : IsConnected (CostructuredArrow F d)
attribute [instance] Initial.out
instance final_op_of_initial (F : C ⥤ D) [Initial F] : Final F.op where
out d := isConnected_of_equivalent (costructuredArrowOpEquivalence F (unop d))
instance initial_op_of_final (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F] : Initial F.op where
out d := isConnected_of_equivalent (structuredArrowOpEquivalence F (unop d))
theorem final_of_initial_op (F : C ⥤ D) [Initial F.op] : Final F :=
{
out := fun d =>
@isConnected_of_isConnected_op _ _
(isConnected_of_equivalent (structuredArrowOpEquivalence F d).symm) }
theorem initial_of_final_op (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F.op] : Initial F :=
{
out := fun d =>
@isConnected_of_isConnected_op _ _
(isConnected_of_equivalent (costructuredArrowOpEquivalence F d).symm) }
attribute [local simp] Adjunction.homEquiv_unit Adjunction.homEquiv_counit
/-- If a functor `R : D ⥤ C` is a right adjoint, it is final. -/
theorem final_of_adjunction {L : C ⥤ D} {R : D ⥤ C} (adj : L ⊣ R) : Final R :=
{ out := fun c =>
let u : StructuredArrow c R := StructuredArrow.mk (adj.unit.app c)
@zigzag_isConnected _ _ ⟨u⟩ fun f g =>
Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag f u from
Or.inr ⟨StructuredArrow.homMk ((adj.homEquiv c f.right).symm f.hom) (by simp [u])⟩))
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag u g from
Or.inl ⟨StructuredArrow.homMk ((adj.homEquiv c g.right).symm g.hom) (by simp [u])⟩)) }
/-- If a functor `L : C ⥤ D` is a left adjoint, it is initial. -/
theorem initial_of_adjunction {L : C ⥤ D} {R : D ⥤ C} (adj : L ⊣ R) : Initial L :=
{ out := fun d =>
let u : CostructuredArrow L d := CostructuredArrow.mk (adj.counit.app d)
@zigzag_isConnected _ _ ⟨u⟩ fun f g =>
Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag f u from
Or.inl ⟨CostructuredArrow.homMk (adj.homEquiv f.left d f.hom) (by simp [u])⟩))
(Relation.ReflTransGen.single
(show Zag u g from
Or.inr ⟨CostructuredArrow.homMk (adj.homEquiv g.left d g.hom) (by simp [u])⟩)) }
instance (priority := 100) final_of_isRightAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsRightAdjoint F] : Final F :=
final_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint F)
instance (priority := 100) initial_of_isLeftAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint F] : Initial F :=
initial_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint F)
theorem final_of_natIso {F F' : C ⥤ D} [Final F] (i : F ≅ F') : Final F' where
out _ := isConnected_of_equivalent (StructuredArrow.mapNatIso i)
theorem final_natIso_iff {F F' : C ⥤ D} (i : F ≅ F') : Final F ↔ Final F' :=
⟨fun _ => final_of_natIso i, fun _ => final_of_natIso i.symm⟩
theorem initial_of_natIso {F F' : C ⥤ D} [Initial F] (i : F ≅ F') : Initial F' where
out _ := isConnected_of_equivalent (CostructuredArrow.mapNatIso i)
theorem initial_natIso_iff {F F' : C ⥤ D} (i : F ≅ F') : Initial F ↔ Initial F' :=
⟨fun _ => initial_of_natIso i, fun _ => initial_of_natIso i.symm⟩
namespace Final
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [Final F]
instance (d : D) : Nonempty (StructuredArrow d F) :=
IsConnected.is_nonempty
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/--
When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, we denote by `lift F d` an arbitrary choice of object in `C` such that
there exists a morphism `d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d)`.
-/
def lift (d : D) : C :=
(Classical.arbitrary (StructuredArrow d F)).right
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, we denote by `homToLift` an arbitrary choice of morphism
`d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d)`.
-/
def homToLift (d : D) : d ⟶ F.obj (lift F d) :=
(Classical.arbitrary (StructuredArrow d F)).hom
/-- We provide an induction principle for reasoning about `lift` and `homToLift`.
We want to perform some construction (usually just a proof) about
the particular choices `lift F d` and `homToLift F d`,
it suffices to perform that construction for some other pair of choices
(denoted `X₀ : C` and `k₀ : d ⟶ F.obj X₀` below),
and to show how to transport such a construction
*both* directions along a morphism between such choices.
-/
def induction {d : D} (Z : ∀ (X : C) (_ : d ⟶ F.obj X), Sort*)
(h₁ :
∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : d ⟶ F.obj X₁) (k₂ : d ⟶ F.obj X₂) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
k₁ ≫ F.map f = k₂ → Z X₁ k₁ → Z X₂ k₂)
(h₂ :
∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : d ⟶ F.obj X₁) (k₂ : d ⟶ F.obj X₂) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
k₁ ≫ F.map f = k₂ → Z X₂ k₂ → Z X₁ k₁)
{X₀ : C} {k₀ : d ⟶ F.obj X₀} (z : Z X₀ k₀) : Z (lift F d) (homToLift F d) := by
apply Nonempty.some
apply
@isPreconnected_induction _ _ _ (fun Y : StructuredArrow d F => Z Y.right Y.hom) _ _
(StructuredArrow.mk k₀) z
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₁ _ _ _ _ f.right _ a
convert f.w.symm
dsimp
simp
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₂ _ _ _ _ f.right _ a
convert f.w.symm
dsimp
simp
variable {F G}
/-- Given a cocone over `F ⋙ G`, we can construct a `Cocone G` with the same cocone point.
-/
@[simps]
def extendCocone : Cocone (F ⋙ G) ⥤ Cocone G where
obj c :=
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun X => G.map (homToLift F X) ≫ c.ι.app (lift F X)
naturality := fun X Y f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
-- This would be true if we'd chosen `lift F X` to be `lift F Y`
-- and `homToLift F X` to be `f ≫ homToLift F Y`.
apply
induction F fun Z k =>
G.map f ≫ G.map (homToLift F Y) ≫ c.ι.app (lift F Y) = G.map k ≫ c.ι.app Z
· intro Z₁ Z₂ k₁ k₂ g a z
rw [← a, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, c.w, z]
· intro Z₁ Z₂ k₁ k₂ g a z
rw [← a, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, c.w] at z
rw [z]
· rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc] } }
map f := { hom := f.hom }
/-- Alternative equational lemma for `(extendCocone c).ι.app` in case a lift of the object
is given explicitly. -/
lemma extendCocone_obj_ι_app' (c : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) {X : D} {Y : C} (f : X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
(extendCocone.obj c).ι.app X = G.map f ≫ c.ι.app Y := by
apply induction (k₀ := f) (z := rfl) F fun Z g =>
G.map g ≫ c.ι.app Z = G.map f ≫ c.ι.app Y
· intro _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
simp [← h₁, ← Functor.comp_map, c.ι.naturality, h₂]
· intro _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
simp [← h₂, ← h₁, ← Functor.comp_map, c.ι.naturality]
@[simp]
theorem colimit_cocone_comp_aux (s : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) (j : C) :
G.map (homToLift F (F.obj j)) ≫ s.ι.app (lift F (F.obj j)) = s.ι.app j := by
-- This point is that this would be true if we took `lift (F.obj j)` to just be `j`
-- and `homToLift (F.obj j)` to be `𝟙 (F.obj j)`.
apply induction F fun X k => G.map k ≫ s.ι.app X = (s.ι.app j :)
· intro j₁ j₂ k₁ k₂ f w h
rw [← w]
rw [← s.w f] at h
simpa using h
· intro j₁ j₂ k₁ k₂ f w h
rw [← w] at h
rw [← s.w f]
simpa using h
· exact s.w (𝟙 _)
variable (F G)
/-- If `F` is final,
the category of cocones on `F ⋙ G` is equivalent to the category of cocones on `G`,
for any `G : D ⥤ E`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconesEquiv : Cocone (F ⋙ G) ≌ Cocone G where
functor := extendCocone
inverse := Cocones.whiskering F
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun c => Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun c => Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
variable {G}
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, and `t : Cocone G` for some `G : D ⥤ E`,
`t.whisker F` is a colimit cocone exactly when `t` is.
-/
def isColimitWhiskerEquiv (t : Cocone G) : IsColimit (t.whisker F) ≃ IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (coconesEquiv F G).symm
/-- When `F` is final, and `t : Cocone (F ⋙ G)`,
`extendCocone.obj t` is a colimit cocone exactly when `t` is.
-/
def isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (t : Cocone (F ⋙ G)) :
IsColimit (extendCocone.obj t) ≃ IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (coconesEquiv F G)
/-- Given a colimit cocone over `G : D ⥤ E` we can construct a colimit cocone over `F ⋙ G`. -/
@[simps]
def colimitCoconeComp (t : ColimitCocone G) : ColimitCocone (F ⋙ G) where
cocone := _
isColimit := (isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm t.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) comp_hasColimit [HasColimit G] : HasColimit (F ⋙ G) :=
HasColimit.mk (colimitCoconeComp F (getColimitCocone G))
instance (priority := 100) comp_preservesColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[PreservesColimit G H] : PreservesColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
preserves {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (G := G ⋙ H) F (H.mapCocone c) ?_⟩
let hc' := isColimitOfPreserves H ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F c).symm hc)
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
instance (priority := 100) comp_reflectsColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[ReflectsColimit G H] : ReflectsColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
reflects {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F _ (isColimitOfReflects H ?_)⟩
let hc' := (isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv (G := G ⋙ H) F _).symm hc
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
instance (priority := 100) compCreatesColimit {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[CreatesColimit G H] : CreatesColimit (F ⋙ G) H where
lifts {c} hc := by
refine ⟨(liftColimit ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F (G := G ⋙ H) _).symm hc)).whisker F, ?_⟩
let i := liftedColimitMapsToOriginal ((isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F (G := G ⋙ H) _).symm hc)
exact (Cocones.whiskering F).mapIso i ≪≫ ((coconesEquiv F (G ⋙ H)).unitIso.app _).symm
instance colimit_pre_isIso [HasColimit G] : IsIso (colimit.pre G F) := by
rw [colimit.pre_eq (colimitCoconeComp F (getColimitCocone G)) (getColimitCocone G)]
erw [IsColimit.desc_self]
dsimp
infer_instance
section
variable (G)
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is final, and `G : D ⥤ E` has a colimit, then `F ⋙ G` has a colimit also and
`colimit (F ⋙ G) ≅ colimit G`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp, stacks 04E7]
def colimitIso [HasColimit G] : colimit (F ⋙ G) ≅ colimit G :=
asIso (colimit.pre G F)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimitIso_hom [HasColimit G] (X : C) :
colimit.ι (F ⋙ G) X ≫ (colimitIso F G).hom = colimit.ι G (F.obj X) := by
simp [colimitIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimitIso_inv [HasColimit G] (X : C) :
colimit.ι G (F.obj X) ≫ (colimitIso F G).inv = colimit.ι (F ⋙ G) X := by
simp [colimitIso]
/-- A pointfree version of `colimitIso`, stating that whiskering by `F` followed by taking the
colimit is isomorpic to taking the colimit on the codomain of `F`. -/
def colimIso [HasColimitsOfShape D E] [HasColimitsOfShape C E] :
(whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj F ⋙ colim ≅ colim (J := D) (C := E) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun G => colimitIso F G) fun f => by
simp only [comp_obj, whiskeringLeft_obj_obj, colim_obj, comp_map, whiskeringLeft_obj_map,
colim_map, colimitIso_hom]
ext
simp only [comp_obj, ι_colimMap_assoc, whiskerLeft_app, colimit.ι_pre, colimit.ι_pre_assoc,
ι_colimMap]
end
/-- Given a colimit cocone over `F ⋙ G` we can construct a colimit cocone over `G`. -/
@[simps]
def colimitCoconeOfComp (t : ColimitCocone (F ⋙ G)) : ColimitCocone G where
cocone := extendCocone.obj t.cocone
isColimit := (isColimitExtendCoconeEquiv F _).symm t.isColimit
/-- When `F` is final, and `F ⋙ G` has a colimit, then `G` has a colimit also.
We can't make this an instance, because `F` is not determined by the goal.
(Even if this weren't a problem, it would cause a loop with `comp_hasColimit`.)
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_comp [HasColimit (F ⋙ G)] : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk (colimitCoconeOfComp F (getColimitCocone (F ⋙ G)))
theorem preservesColimit_of_comp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[PreservesColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : PreservesColimit G H where
preserves {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _ ?_⟩
let hc' := isColimitOfPreserves H ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
theorem reflectsColimit_of_comp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[ReflectsColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : ReflectsColimit G H where
reflects {c} hc := by
refine ⟨isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _ (isColimitOfReflects H ?_)⟩
let hc' := (isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc' (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- If `F` is final and `F ⋙ G` creates colimits of `H`, then so does `G`. -/
def createsColimitOfComp {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] {H : E ⥤ B}
[CreatesColimit (F ⋙ G) H] : CreatesColimit G H where
reflects := (reflectsColimit_of_comp F).reflects
lifts {c} hc := by
refine ⟨(extendCocone (F := F)).obj (liftColimit ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)), ?_⟩
let i := liftedColimitMapsToOriginal (K := (F ⋙ G)) ((isColimitWhiskerEquiv F _).symm hc)
refine ?_ ≪≫ ((extendCocone (F := F)).mapIso i) ≪≫ ((coconesEquiv F (G ⋙ H)).counitIso.app _)
exact Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
include F in
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_final [HasColimitsOfShape C E] : HasColimitsOfShape D E where
has_colimit := fun _ => hasColimit_of_comp F
include F in
theorem preservesColimitsOfShape_of_final {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[PreservesColimitsOfShape C H] : PreservesColimitsOfShape D H where
preservesColimit := preservesColimit_of_comp F
include F in
theorem reflectsColimitsOfShape_of_final {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape C H] : ReflectsColimitsOfShape D H where
reflectsColimit := reflectsColimit_of_comp F
include F in
/-- If `H` creates colimits of shape `C` and `F : C ⥤ D` is final, then `H` creates colimits of
shape `D`. -/
def createsColimitsOfShapeOfFinal {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B] (H : E ⥤ B)
[CreatesColimitsOfShape C H] : CreatesColimitsOfShape D H where
CreatesColimit := createsColimitOfComp F
end Final
end ArbitraryUniverse
section LocallySmall
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
namespace Final
theorem zigzag_of_eqvGen_quot_rel {F : C ⥤ D} {d : D} {f₁ f₂ : Σ X, d ⟶ F.obj X}
(t : Relation.EqvGen (Types.Quot.Rel.{v, v} (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d))) f₁ f₂) :
Zigzag (StructuredArrow.mk f₁.2) (StructuredArrow.mk f₂.2) := by
induction t with
| rel x y r =>
obtain ⟨f, w⟩ := r
fconstructor
swap
· fconstructor
left; fconstructor
exact StructuredArrow.homMk f
| refl => fconstructor
| symm x y _ ih =>
apply zigzag_symmetric
exact ih
| trans x y z _ _ ih₁ ih₂ =>
apply Relation.ReflTransGen.trans
· exact ih₁
· exact ih₂
end Final
/-- If `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit` for all `d : D`, then `F` is final.
-/
theorem final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit
(I : ∀ d, colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit) : Final F :=
⟨fun d => by
have : Nonempty (StructuredArrow d F) := by
have := (I d).inv PUnit.unit
obtain ⟨j, y, rfl⟩ := Limits.Types.jointly_surjective'.{v, v} this
exact ⟨StructuredArrow.mk y⟩
apply zigzag_isConnected
rintro ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, X₁, f₁⟩ ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, X₂, f₂⟩
let y₁ := colimit.ι (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) X₁ f₁
let y₂ := colimit.ι (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) X₂ f₂
have e : y₁ = y₂ := by
apply (I d).toEquiv.injective
ext
have t := Types.colimit_eq.{v, v} e
clear e y₁ y₂
exact Final.zigzag_of_eqvGen_quot_rel t⟩
/-- A variant of `final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit` where we bind the various claims
about `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (Opposite.op d))` for each `d : D` into a single claim about
the presheaf `colimit (F ⋙ yoneda)`. -/
theorem final_of_isTerminal_colimit_comp_yoneda
(h : IsTerminal (colimit (F ⋙ yoneda))) : Final F := by
refine final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit _ (fun d => ?_)
refine Types.isTerminalEquivIsoPUnit _ ?_
let b := IsTerminal.isTerminalObj ((evaluation _ _).obj (Opposite.op d)) _ h
exact b.ofIso <| preservesColimitIso ((evaluation _ _).obj (Opposite.op d)) (F ⋙ yoneda)
/-- If the universal morphism `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ⟶ colimit (coyoneda.obj (op d))`
is an isomorphism (as it always is when `F` is final),
then `colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit`
(simply because `colimit (coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit`).
-/
def Final.colimitCompCoyonedaIso (d : D) [IsIso (colimit.pre (coyoneda.obj (op d)) F)] :
colimit (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op d)) ≅ PUnit :=
asIso (colimit.pre (coyoneda.obj (op d)) F) ≪≫ Coyoneda.colimitCoyonedaIso (op d)
end LocallySmall
section SmallCategory
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type v} [Category.{v} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
theorem final_iff_isIso_colimit_pre : Final F ↔ ∀ G : D ⥤ Type v, IsIso (colimit.pre G F) :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance,
fun _ => final_of_colimit_comp_coyoneda_iso_pUnit _ fun _ => Final.colimitCompCoyonedaIso _ _⟩
end SmallCategory
namespace Initial
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D) [Initial F]
instance (d : D) : Nonempty (CostructuredArrow F d) :=
IsConnected.is_nonempty
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/--
When `F : C ⥤ D` is initial, we denote by `lift F d` an arbitrary choice of object in `C` such that
there exists a morphism `F.obj (lift F d) ⟶ d`.
-/
def lift (d : D) : C :=
(Classical.arbitrary (CostructuredArrow F d)).left
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is initial, we denote by `homToLift` an arbitrary choice of morphism
`F.obj (lift F d) ⟶ d`.
-/
def homToLift (d : D) : F.obj (lift F d) ⟶ d :=
(Classical.arbitrary (CostructuredArrow F d)).hom
/-- We provide an induction principle for reasoning about `lift` and `homToLift`.
We want to perform some construction (usually just a proof) about
the particular choices `lift F d` and `homToLift F d`,
it suffices to perform that construction for some other pair of choices
(denoted `X₀ : C` and `k₀ : F.obj X₀ ⟶ d` below),
and to show how to transport such a construction
*both* directions along a morphism between such choices.
-/
def induction {d : D} (Z : ∀ (X : C) (_ : F.obj X ⟶ d), Sort*)
(h₁ :
∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : F.obj X₁ ⟶ d) (k₂ : F.obj X₂ ⟶ d) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
F.map f ≫ k₂ = k₁ → Z X₁ k₁ → Z X₂ k₂)
(h₂ :
| ∀ (X₁ X₂) (k₁ : F.obj X₁ ⟶ d) (k₂ : F.obj X₂ ⟶ d) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂),
F.map f ≫ k₂ = k₁ → Z X₂ k₂ → Z X₁ k₁)
{X₀ : C} {k₀ : F.obj X₀ ⟶ d} (z : Z X₀ k₀) : Z (lift F d) (homToLift F d) := by
apply Nonempty.some
apply
@isPreconnected_induction _ _ _ (fun Y : CostructuredArrow F d => Z Y.left Y.hom) _ _
(CostructuredArrow.mk k₀) z
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₁ _ _ _ _ f.left _ a
convert f.w
dsimp
simp
· intro j₁ j₂ f a
fapply h₂ _ _ _ _ f.left _ a
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Final.lean | 548 | 561 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.KummerExtension
/-!
# More results on primitive roots of unity
(We put these in a separate file because of the `KummerExtension` import.)
Assume that `μ` is a primitive `n`th root of unity in an integral domain `R`. Then
$$ \prod_{k=1}^{n-1} (1 - \mu^k) = n \,; $$
see `IsPrimitiveRoot.prod_one_sub_pow_eq_order` and its variant
`IsPrimitiveRoot.prod_pow_sub_one_eq_order` in terms of `∏ (μ^k - 1)`.
We use this to deduce that `n` is divisible by `(μ - 1)^k` in `ℤ[μ] ⊆ R` when `k < n`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
open Finset Polynomial
/-- If `μ` is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`, then `∏(1≤k<n) (1-μ^k) = n`.
(Stated with `n+1` in place of `n` to avoid the condition `n ≠ 0`.) -/
lemma prod_one_sub_pow_eq_order {n : ℕ} {μ : R} (hμ : IsPrimitiveRoot μ (n + 1)) :
∏ k ∈ range n, (1 - μ ^ (k + 1)) = n + 1 := by
have := X_pow_sub_C_eq_prod hμ n.zero_lt_succ (one_pow (n + 1))
rw [C_1, ← mul_geom_sum, prod_range_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, mul_comm, eq_comm] at this
replace this := mul_right_cancel₀ (Polynomial.X_sub_C_ne_zero 1) this
apply_fun Polynomial.eval 1 at this
simpa only [mul_one, map_pow, eval_prod, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_pow, eval_C, eval_geom_sum,
one_pow, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] using this
/-- If `μ` is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`, then `(-1)^(n-1) * ∏(1≤k<n) (μ^k-1) = n`.
| (Stated with `n+1` in place of `n` to avoid the condition `n ≠ 0`.) -/
lemma prod_pow_sub_one_eq_order {n : ℕ} {μ : R} (hμ : IsPrimitiveRoot μ (n + 1)) :
(-1) ^ n * ∏ k ∈ range n, (μ ^ (k + 1) - 1) = n + 1 := by
have : (-1 : R) ^ n = ∏ k ∈ range n, -1 := by rw [prod_const, card_range]
simp only [this, ← prod_mul_distrib, neg_one_mul, neg_sub, ← prod_one_sub_pow_eq_order hμ]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Lemmas.lean | 39 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
open AffineSubspace
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
theorem existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] {ps : Set P} (hnps : ps.Nonempty) {p : P} (hps : ps ⊆ s)
(hp : p ∉ s) (hu : ∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ s ∧ ps ⊆ (cs : Set P)) :
∃! cs₂ : Sphere P,
cs₂.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (s : Set P)) ∧ insert p ps ⊆ (cs₂ : Set P) := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.Nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps)
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩
simp only at hcc hcr hcccru
let x := dist cc (orthogonalProjection s p)
let y := dist p (orthogonalProjection s p)
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonalProjection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y)
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ cc
let cr₂ := √(cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂)
use ⟨cc₂, cr₂⟩
simp -zeta -proj only
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ (orthogonalProjection s p : P) :=
by simp
constructor
· constructor
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc))
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonalProjection_mem _)))
· intro p₁ hp₁
rw [Sphere.mem_coe, mem_sphere, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))]
rcases hp₁ with hp₁ | hp₁
· rw [hp₁]
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [div_div, sub_div', one_mul, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, add_div', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff, ycc₂]
ring
· rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp₁),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc, Subtype.coe_mk,
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp₁ hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hy0, abs_mul_abs_self]
· rintro ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩
simp only at hcc₃ hcr₃
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ, ∃ p0 ∈ s, cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonalProjection s) p)) +ᵥ p0 := by
rwa [mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)] at hcc₃
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p₁ ∈ ps, dist p₁ cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, fun p₁ hp₁ => dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp₁) hcr₃⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃'
obtain ⟨cr₃', hcr₃'⟩ := hcr₃'
have hu := hcccru ⟨cc₃', cr₃'⟩
simp only at hu
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩
-- Porting note: was
-- cases' hu with hucc hucr
-- substs hucc hucr
cases hu
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = √(cr * cr + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)) := by
obtain ⟨p0, hp0⟩ := hnps
have h' : ↑(⟨cc, hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc := rfl
rw [← dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0) hcr₃, hcc₃'', ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp0),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃', h',
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp0 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ |t₃|, ← mul_assoc,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
replace hcr₃ := dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert _ _) hcr₃
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃
rw [show
x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) = x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)
by ring,
add_left_inj] at hcr₃
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y := by field_simp [ycc₂, ← hcr₃, hy0]
subst ht₃
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃''
congr
rw [hcr₃val]
congr 2
field_simp [hy0]
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
theorem _root_.AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq {ι : Type*} [hne : Nonempty ι] [Finite ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent ℝ p) :
∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range p) ∧ Set.range p ⊆ (cs : Set P) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with m hm generalizing ι
· exfalso
have h := Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne
rw [hn] at h
exact lt_irrefl 0 h
· rcases m with - | m
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_one_iff] at hn
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn
haveI : Unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩
use ⟨p i, 0⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton]
constructor
· simp_rw [hi default, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨⟨⟩, by simp only [Metric.sphere_zero, Set.mem_singleton_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨cc, cr⟩
simp only
rintro ⟨rfl, hdist⟩
simp? [Set.singleton_subset_iff] at hdist says
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, Metric.mem_sphere, dist_self] at hdist
rw [hi default, hdist]
· have i := hne.some
let ι2 := { x // x ≠ i }
classical
have hc : Fintype.card ι2 = m + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype {x | x ≠ i}]
· rw [Finset.filter_not]
-- Porting note: removed `simp_rw [eq_comm]` and used `filter_eq'` instead of `filter_eq`
rw [Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _),
Finset.card_sdiff (Finset.subset_univ _), Finset.card_singleton, Finset.card_univ, hn]
simp
· simp
haveI : Nonempty ι2 := Fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
have ha2 : AffineIndependent ℝ fun i2 : ι2 => p i2 := ha.subtype _
replace hm := hm ha2 _ hc
have hr : Set.range p = insert (p i) (Set.range fun i2 : ι2 => p i2) := by
change _ = insert _ (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2)
rw [← Set.image_eq_range, ← Set.image_univ, ← Set.image_insert_eq]
congr with j
simp [Classical.em]
rw [hr, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
refine existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert (Set.range_nonempty _) (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) ?_ hm
convert ha.not_mem_affineSpan_diff i Set.univ
change (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2) = _
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
congr with j
simp
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The circumsphere of a simplex. -/
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
/-- The property satisfied by the circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
/-- The center of the circumsphere is the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The radius of the circumsphere is the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- All points lie in the circumsphere. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.2
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumsphere. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
/-- If there exists a distance that a point has from all vertices of a
simplex, the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace
spanned by that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter := by
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (fun x => dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr
have hr : ∃ (r : ℝ), ∀ (a : P),
a ∈ Set.range (fun (i : Fin (n + 1)) => s.points i) → dist a p = r := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
use r
refine Set.forall_mem_range.mpr ?_
exact hr
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) p] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq (orthogonalProjection_mem p) fun i => hr _ (Set.mem_range_self i)
/-- If a point has the same distance from all vertices of a simplex,
the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace spanned by
that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P} {r : ℝ}
(hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The orthogonal projection of the circumcenter onto a face is the
circumcenter of that face. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : #fs = m + 1) :
↑((s.face h).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) = (s.face h).circumcenter :=
haveI hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r := by
use s.circumradius
simp [face_points]
orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.circumcenter = s₂.circumcenter := by
have hs : s₁.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s₂.points) :=
h ▸ s₁.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have hr : ∀ i, dist (s₂.points i) s₁.circumcenter = s₁.circumradius := by
intro i
have hi : s₂.points i ∈ Set.range s₂.points := Set.mem_range_self _
rw [← h, Set.mem_range] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj⟩
rw [← hj, s₁.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius j]
exact s₂.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hs hr
/-- An index type for the vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter.
This is for use in calculations where it is convenient to work with
affine combinations of vertices together with the circumcenter. (An
equivalent form sometimes used in the literature is placing the
circumcenter at the origin and working with vectors for the vertices.) -/
inductive PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n : ℕ)
| pointIndex : Fin (n + 1) → PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
| circumcenterIndex : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
deriving Fintype
open PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
instance pointsWithCircumcenterIndexInhabited (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n) :=
⟨circumcenterIndex⟩
/-- `pointIndex` as an embedding. -/
def pointIndexEmbedding (n : ℕ) : Fin (n + 1) ↪ PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n :=
⟨fun i => pointIndex i, fun _ _ h => by injection h⟩
/-- The sum of a function over `PointsWithCircumcenterIndex`. -/
theorem sum_pointsWithCircumcenter {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] {n : ℕ}
(f : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → α) :
∑ i, f i = (∑ i : Fin (n + 1), f (pointIndex i)) + f circumcenterIndex := by
classical
have h : univ = insert circumcenterIndex (univ.map (pointIndexEmbedding n)) := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun _ => mem_univ _⟩
obtain i | - := x
· exact mem_insert_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ i))
· exact mem_insert_self _ _
change _ = (∑ i, f (pointIndexEmbedding n i)) + _
rw [add_comm, h, ← sum_map, sum_insert]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, not_exists]
rintro x ⟨_, h⟩
injection h
/-- The vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter. -/
def pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → P
| pointIndex i => s.points i
| circumcenterIndex => s.circumcenter
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to a `pointIndex` value,
equals `points` applied to that value. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_point {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (pointIndex i) = s.points i :=
rfl
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to `circumcenterIndex`, equals the
circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter circumcenterIndex = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The weights for a single vertex of a simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex j => if j = i then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
∑ j, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i j = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ (pointIndex i) (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- A single vertex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
symm
refine
affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _)
(by simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]) ?_
intro i hi hn
cases i
· have h : _ ≠ i := fun h => hn (h ▸ rfl)
simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter, h]
· rfl
/-- The weights for the centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i ∈ fs then (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1, if the `Finset` is nonempty. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))} (h : fs.Nonempty) :
∑ i, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, add_zero, ←
fs.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty ℝ h, ← sum_indicator_subset _ fs.subset_univ]
rcongr
/-- The centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
fs.centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs) := by
simp_rw [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, zero_smul, add_zero, centroidWeights,
← sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero (Function.const (Fin (n + 1)) (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹)
(fun i wi => wi • (s.points i -ᵥ Classical.choice AddTorsor.nonempty)) fs.subset_univ fun _ =>
zero_smul ℝ _,
Set.indicator_apply]
congr
/-- The weights for the circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => 0
| circumcenterIndex => 1
/-- `circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ circumcenterIndex (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
symm
refine affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _) rfl ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ _ hn <;> tauto
/-- The weights for the reflection of the circumcenter in an edge of a
simplex. This definition is only valid with `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -1
/-- `reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_ite,
sum_const, filter_or, filter_eq']
rw [card_union_of_disjoint]
· set_option simprocs false in simp
· simpa only [if_true, mem_univ, disjoint_singleton] using h
/-- The reflection of the circumcenter of a simplex in an edge, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem reflection_circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
reflection (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
have hc : #{i₁, i₂} = 2 := by simp [h]
-- Making the next line a separate definition helps the elaborator:
set W : AffineSubspace ℝ P := affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})
have h_faces :
(orthogonalProjection W s.circumcenter : P) =
↑((s.face hc).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) := by
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_subspace
simp [W]
rw [EuclideanGeometry.reflection_apply, h_faces, s.orthogonalProjection_circumcenter hc,
circumcenter_eq_centroid, s.face_centroid_eq_centroid hc,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
affineCombination_vsub, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, affineCombination_vsub,
weightedVSub_apply, sum_pointsWithCircumcenter]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_smul, add_smul, sub_smul,
centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, ite_smul, zero_smul, sub_zero,
apply_ite₂ (· + ·), add_zero, ← add_smul, hc, zero_sub, neg_smul, sub_self, add_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert sum_const_zero`
rw [← sum_const_zero]
congr
norm_num
end Simplex
end Affine
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Affine AffineSubspace Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is complete,
that contains a set of points, those points are cospherical if and
only if they are equidistant from some point in that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] [s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, hcr⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq h c] at hcr
exact ⟨orthogonalProjection s c, orthogonalProjection_mem _, hcr⟩
· exact fun ⟨c, _, hd⟩ => ⟨c, hd⟩
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is
finite-dimensional, that contains a set of points, those points are
cospherical if and only if they are equidistant from some point in
that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete h
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use r
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use c
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
exact ⟨⟨c, r⟩, fun sx hsx => Sphere.ext (hc sx hsx) (hr sx hsx)⟩
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- Suppose all distances from `p₁` and `p₂` to the points of a
simplex are equal, and that `p₁` and `p₂` lie in the affine span of
`p` with the vertices of that simplex. Then `p₁` and `p₂` are equal
or reflections of each other in the affine span of the vertices of the
simplex. -/
theorem eq_or_eq_reflection_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Simplex ℝ P n} {p p₁ p₂ : P} {r : ℝ}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points)))
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points))) (h₁ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₂ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₂ = r) :
p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₁ = reflection (affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) p₂ := by
set span_s := affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
have h₁' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₁
have h₂' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₂
rw [← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)]
at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨r₁, p₁o, hp₁o, hp₁⟩ := hp₁
obtain ⟨r₂, p₂o, hp₂o, hp₂⟩ := hp₂
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = p₁o := by
subst hp₁
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₁o
rw [h₁'] at hp₁
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₂) = p₂o := by
subst hp₂
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₂o
rw [h₂'] at hp₂
have h : s.points 0 ∈ span_s := mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_range_self _)
have hd₁ :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₁ h₁' h
have hd₂ :
dist p₂ s.circumcenter * dist p₂ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₂ h₂' h
rw [← hd₂, hp₁, hp₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter,
vadd_vsub, vadd_vsub, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right, real_inner_smul_right, ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at hd₁
by_cases hp : p = s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p
· rw [Simplex.orthogonalProjectionSpan] at hp
rw [hp₁, hp₂, ← hp]
simp only [true_or, eq_self_iff_true, smul_zero, vsub_self]
· have hz : ⟪p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p, p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p⟫ ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, inner_self_eq_zero] using hp
rw [mul_left_inj' hz, mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff] at hd₁
rw [hp₁, hp₂]
rcases hd₁ with hd₁ | hd₁
· left
rw [hd₁]
· right
rw [hd₁, reflection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection p r₂ s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan,
neg_smul]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 899 | 943 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Divisibility over ℤ
This file collects results for the integers that use ring theory in their proofs or
cases of ℤ being examples of structures in ring theory.
## Main statements
* `Int.Prime.dvd_mul'`: A prime number dividing a product in ℤ divides at least one factor.
* `Int.exists_prime_and_dvd`: Every non-unit integer has a prime divisor.
* `Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime`: Primality in ℤ corresponds to primality of its absolute value in ℕ.
* `Int.span_natAbs`: The principal ideal generated by `a.natAbs` is equal to that of `a`.
## Tags
prime, irreducible, integers, normalization monoid, gcd monoid, greatest common divisor
-/
namespace Int
@[deprecated "use `isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.symm` instead" (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem gcd_eq_one_iff_coprime {a b : ℤ} : Int.gcd a b = 1 ↔ IsCoprime a b :=
isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.symm
theorem isCoprime_iff_nat_coprime {a b : ℤ} : IsCoprime a b ↔ Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, gcd_eq_natAbs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_iff_nat_coprime := isCoprime_iff_nat_coprime
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) ≠ 1`, then `gcd a m ≠ 1` or `gcd a n ≠ 1`. -/
theorem gcd_ne_one_iff_gcd_mul_right_ne_one {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} :
a.gcd (m * n) ≠ 1 ↔ a.gcd m ≠ 1 ∨ a.gcd n ≠ 1 := by
simp only [← isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, ← not_and_or, not_iff_not, IsCoprime.mul_right_iff]
theorem sq_of_gcd_eq_one {a b c : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd a b = 1) (heq : a * b = c ^ 2) :
∃ a0 : ℤ, a = a0 ^ 2 ∨ a = -a0 ^ 2 := by
have h' : IsUnit (GCDMonoid.gcd a b) := by
rw [← coe_gcd, h, Int.ofNat_one]
exact isUnit_one
obtain ⟨d, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩ := exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow h' heq
use d
rw [← hu]
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with hu' | hu' <;>
· rw [hu']
simp
theorem sq_of_isCoprime {a b c : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime a b) (heq : a * b = c ^ 2) :
∃ a0 : ℤ, a = a0 ^ 2 ∨ a = -a0 ^ 2 :=
sq_of_gcd_eq_one (isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mp h) heq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias sq_of_coprime := sq_of_isCoprime
theorem natAbs_euclideanDomain_gcd (a b : ℤ) :
Int.natAbs (EuclideanDomain.gcd a b) = Int.gcd a b := by
apply Nat.dvd_antisymm <;> rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
· rw [Int.natAbs_dvd]
exact Int.dvd_coe_gcd (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· rw [Int.dvd_natAbs]
exact EuclideanDomain.dvd_gcd Int.gcd_dvd_left Int.gcd_dvd_right
end Int
theorem Int.Prime.dvd_mul {m n : ℤ} {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (h : (p : ℤ) ∣ m * n) :
| p ∣ m.natAbs ∨ p ∣ n.natAbs := by
rwa [← hp.dvd_mul, ← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd]
theorem Int.Prime.dvd_mul' {m n : ℤ} {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (h : (p : ℤ) ∣ m * n) :
(p : ℤ) ∣ m ∨ (p : ℤ) ∣ n := by
rw [Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd]
exact Int.Prime.dvd_mul hp h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Int/Basic.lean | 77 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
/-!
# Termination of a hydra game
This file deals with the following version of the hydra game: each head of the hydra is
labelled by an element in a type `α`, and when you cut off one head with label `a`, it
grows back an arbitrary but finite number of heads, all labelled by elements smaller than
`a` with respect to a well-founded relation `r` on `α`. We show that no matter how (in
what order) you choose cut off the heads, the game always terminates, i.e. all heads will
eventually be cut off (but of course it can last arbitrarily long, i.e. takes an
arbitrary finite number of steps).
This result is stated as the well-foundedness of the `CutExpand` relation defined in
this file: we model the heads of the hydra as a multiset of elements of `α`, and the
valid "moves" of the game are modelled by the relation `CutExpand r` on `Multiset α`:
`CutExpand r s' s` is true iff `s'` is obtained by removing one head `a ∈ s` and
adding back an arbitrary multiset `t` of heads such that all `a' ∈ t` satisfy `r a' a`.
We follow the proof by Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine at https://mathoverflow.net/a/229084/3332.
TODO: formalize the relations corresponding to more powerful (e.g. Kirby–Paris and Buchholz)
hydras, and prove their well-foundedness.
-/
namespace Relation
open Multiset Prod
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The relation that specifies valid moves in our hydra game. `CutExpand r s' s`
means that `s'` is obtained by removing one head `a ∈ s` and adding back an arbitrary
multiset `t` of heads such that all `a' ∈ t` satisfy `r a' a`.
This is most directly translated into `s' = s.erase a + t`, but `Multiset.erase` requires
`DecidableEq α`, so we use the equivalent condition `s' + {a} = s + t` instead, which
is also easier to verify for explicit multisets `s'`, `s` and `t`.
We also don't include the condition `a ∈ s` because `s' + {a} = s + t` already
guarantees `a ∈ s + t`, and if `r` is irreflexive then `a ∉ t`, which is the
case when `r` is well-founded, the case we are primarily interested in.
The lemma `Relation.cutExpand_iff` below converts between this convenient definition
and the direct translation when `r` is irreflexive. -/
def CutExpand (r : α → α → Prop) (s' s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
∃ (t : Multiset α) (a : α), (∀ a' ∈ t, r a' a) ∧ s' + {a} = s + t
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem cutExpand_le_invImage_lex [DecidableEq α] [IsIrrefl α r] :
CutExpand r ≤ InvImage (Finsupp.Lex (rᶜ ⊓ (· ≠ ·)) (· < ·)) toFinsupp := by
rintro s t ⟨u, a, hr, he⟩
replace hr := fun a' ↦ mt (hr a')
classical
refine ⟨a, fun b h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp_rw [toFinsupp_apply]
· apply_fun count b at he
simpa only [count_add, count_singleton, if_neg h.2, add_zero, count_eq_zero.2 (hr b h.1)]
using he
· apply_fun count a at he
simp only [count_add, count_singleton_self, count_eq_zero.2 (hr _ (irrefl_of r a)),
add_zero] at he
exact he ▸ Nat.lt_succ_self _
theorem cutExpand_singleton {s x} (h : ∀ x' ∈ s, r x' x) : CutExpand r s {x} :=
⟨s, x, h, add_comm s _⟩
theorem cutExpand_singleton_singleton {x' x} (h : r x' x) : CutExpand r {x'} {x} :=
cutExpand_singleton fun a h ↦ by rwa [mem_singleton.1 h]
theorem cutExpand_add_left {t u} (s) : CutExpand r (s + t) (s + u) ↔ CutExpand r t u :=
exists₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ and_congr Iff.rfl <| by rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, add_left_cancel_iff]
lemma cutExpand_add_right {s' s} (t) : CutExpand r (s' + t) (s + t) ↔ CutExpand r s' s := by
convert cutExpand_add_left t using 2 <;> apply add_comm
theorem cutExpand_add_single {a' a : α} (s : Multiset α) (h : r a' a) :
CutExpand r (s + {a'}) (s + {a}) :=
(cutExpand_add_left s).2 <| cutExpand_singleton_singleton h
| theorem cutExpand_single_add {a' a : α} (h : r a' a) (s : Multiset α) :
CutExpand r ({a'} + s) ({a} + s) :=
| Mathlib/Logic/Hydra.lean | 89 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.HasseDeriv
/-!
# Taylor expansions of polynomials
## Main declarations
* `Polynomial.taylor`: the Taylor expansion of the polynomial `f` at `r`
* `Polynomial.taylor_coeff`: the `k`th coefficient of `taylor r f` is
`(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`
* `Polynomial.eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero`:
the identity principle: a polynomial is 0 iff all its Hasse derivatives are zero
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X])
/-- The Taylor expansion of a polynomial `f` at `r`. -/
def taylor (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun f := f.comp (X + C r)
map_add' _ _ := add_comp
map_smul' c f := by simp only [smul_eq_C_mul, C_mul_comp, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem taylor_apply : taylor r f = f.comp (X + C r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem taylor_X : taylor r X = X + C r := by simp only [taylor_apply, X_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_C (x : R) : taylor r (C x) = C x := by simp only [taylor_apply, C_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_zero' : taylor (0 : R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp only [taylor_apply, add_zero, comp_X, map_zero, LinearMap.id_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp]
theorem taylor_zero (f : R[X]) : taylor 0 f = f := by rw [taylor_zero', LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_one : taylor r (1 : R[X]) = C 1 := by rw [← C_1, taylor_C]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_monomial (i : ℕ) (k : R) : taylor r (monomial i k) = C k * (X + C r) ^ i := by
simp [taylor_apply]
/-- The `k`th coefficient of `Polynomial.taylor r f` is `(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`. -/
theorem taylor_coeff (n : ℕ) : (taylor r f).coeff n = (hasseDeriv n f).eval r :=
show (lcoeff R n).comp (taylor r) f = (leval r).comp (hasseDeriv n) f by
congr 1; clear! f; ext i
simp only [leval_apply, mul_one, one_mul, eval_monomial, LinearMap.comp_apply, coeff_C_mul,
hasseDeriv_monomial, taylor_apply, monomial_comp, C_1, (commute_X (C r)).add_pow i,
map_sum]
simp only [lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_natCast, mul_assoc, ← C_pow, ← C_mul, coeff_mul_C,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, coeff_X_pow, boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_range]
split_ifs with h; · rfl
push_neg at h; rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_zero : (taylor r f).coeff 0 = f.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_zero, LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_one : (taylor r f).coeff 1 = f.derivative.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_one]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_taylor (p : R[X]) (r : R) : natDegree (taylor r p) = natDegree p := by
refine map_natDegree_eq_natDegree _ ?_
nontriviality R
intro n c c0
simp [taylor_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero, natDegree_pow_X_add_C, c0]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_mul {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (p q : R[X]) :
taylor r (p * q) = taylor r p * taylor r q := by simp only [taylor_apply, mul_comp]
/-- `Polynomial.taylor` as an `AlgHom` for commutative semirings -/
@[simps!]
def taylorAlgHom {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one r) (taylor_mul r)
theorem taylor_taylor {R} [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (r s : R) :
taylor r (taylor s f) = taylor (r + s) f := by
simp only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, map_add, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_add, add_assoc]
theorem taylor_eval {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval s = f.eval (s + r) := by
simp only [taylor_apply, eval_comp, eval_C, eval_X, eval_add]
theorem taylor_eval_sub {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval (s - r) = f.eval s := by rw [taylor_eval, sub_add_cancel]
theorem taylor_injective {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) : Function.Injective (taylor r) := by
intro f g h
apply_fun taylor (-r) at h
simpa only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_neg, neg_add_cancel_right,
comp_X] using h
theorem eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R)
(h : ∀ k, (hasseDeriv k f).eval r = 0) : f = 0 := by
apply taylor_injective r
rw [LinearMap.map_zero]
ext k
simp only [taylor_coeff, h, coeff_zero]
| /-- Taylor's formula. -/
theorem sum_taylor_eq {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R) :
((taylor r f).sum fun i a => C a * (X - C r) ^ i) = f := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Taylor.lean | 121 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Topological groups
This file defines the following typeclasses:
* `IsTopologicalGroup`, `IsTopologicalAddGroup`: multiplicative and additive topological groups,
i.e., groups with continuous `(*)` and `(⁻¹)` / `(+)` and `(-)`;
* `ContinuousSub G` means that `G` has a continuous subtraction operation.
There is an instance deducing `ContinuousSub` from `IsTopologicalGroup` but we use a separate
typeclass because, e.g., `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0` have continuous subtraction but are not additive groups.
We also define `Homeomorph` versions of several `Equiv`s: `Homeomorph.mulLeft`,
`Homeomorph.mulRight`, `Homeomorph.inv`, and prove a few facts about neighbourhood filters in
groups.
## Tags
topological space, group, topological group
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function Topology MulOpposite Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {G : Type w} {H : Type x} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### Groups with continuous multiplication
In this section we prove a few statements about groups with continuous `(*)`.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Multiplication from the left in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the left in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulLeft (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.coe_mulLeft (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulLeft a) = (a * ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulLeft_symm (a : G) : (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).symm = Homeomorph.mulLeft a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.left_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_left x _ h
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.left_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_left x _ h
/-- Multiplication from the right in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the right in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulRight (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulRight a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_mulRight (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulRight a) = (· * a) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulRight_symm (a : G) :
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).symm = Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.right_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (op x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.right_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (op x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one (h : IsOpen ({1} : Set G)) :
DiscreteTopology G := by
rw [← singletons_open_iff_discrete]
intro g
suffices {g} = (g⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' {1} by
rw [this]
exact (continuous_mul_left g⁻¹).isOpen_preimage _ h
simp only [mul_one, Set.preimage_mul_left_singleton, eq_self_iff_true, inv_inv,
Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_iff_isOpen_singleton_one : DiscreteTopology G ↔ IsOpen ({1} : Set G) :=
⟨fun h => forall_open_iff_discrete.mpr h {1}, discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one⟩
end ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### `ContinuousInv` and `ContinuousNeg`
-/
section ContinuousInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [ContinuousInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.induced {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [Group α]
[DivisionMonoid β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [ContinuousInv β] (f : F) :
@ContinuousInv α (tβ.induced f) _ := by
let _tα := tβ.induced f
refine ⟨continuous_induced_rng.2 ?_⟩
simp only [Function.comp_def, map_inv]
fun_prop
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.inv {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : (x⁻¹) ⤳ (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.inv {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) : Inseparable (x⁻¹) (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : ∀ m : ℤ, (x ^ m) ⤳ (y ^ m)
| .ofNat n => by simpa using h.pow n
| .negSucc n => by simpa using (h.pow (n + 1)).inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) (m : ℤ) :
Inseparable (x ^ m) (y ^ m) :=
(h.specializes.zpow m).antisymm (h.specializes'.zpow m)
@[to_additive]
instance : ContinuousInv (ULift G) :=
⟨continuous_uliftUp.comp (continuous_inv.comp continuous_uliftDown)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_inv {s : Set G} : ContinuousOn Inv.inv s :=
continuous_inv.continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inv {s : Set G} {x : G} : ContinuousWithinAt Inv.inv s x :=
continuous_inv.continuousWithinAt
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_inv {x : G} : ContinuousAt Inv.inv x :=
continuous_inv.continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv (a : G) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instContinuousInv : ContinuousInv Gᵒᵈ := ‹ContinuousInv G›
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.continuousInv [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] :
ContinuousInv (G × H) :=
⟨continuous_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_inv.snd'⟩
variable {ι : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.continuousInv {C : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (C i)] [∀ i, Inv (C i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousInv (C i)] : ContinuousInv (∀ i, C i) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
/-- A version of `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. It is needed because sometimes
Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions. It is needed
because sometimes Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions."]
instance Pi.has_continuous_inv' : ContinuousInv (ι → G) :=
Pi.continuousInv
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) continuousInv_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H]
[DiscreteTopology H] : ContinuousInv H :=
⟨continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩
section PointwiseLimits
variable (G₁ G₂ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G₂] [T2Space G₂]
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosed_setOf_map_inv [Inv G₁] [Inv G₂] [ContinuousInv G₂] :
IsClosed { f : G₁ → G₂ | ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹ } := by
simp only [setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_eq (continuous_apply _) (continuous_apply _).inv
end PointwiseLimits
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] : ContinuousNeg (Additive H) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv H _ _ _
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Neg H] [ContinuousNeg H] : ContinuousInv (Multiplicative H) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg H _ _ _
end ContinuousInv
section ContinuousInvolutiveInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] {s : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.inv (hs : IsCompact s) : IsCompact s⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv_eq_inv]
exact hs.image continuous_inv
variable (G)
/-- Inversion in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Negation in a topological group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.inv (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G]
[ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.inv G with
continuous_toFun := continuous_inv
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_inv {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] :
⇑(Homeomorph.inv G) = Inv.inv := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_inv (a : G) : 𝓝 a⁻¹ = (𝓝 a)⁻¹ :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq a).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_inv : IsOpenMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_inv : IsClosedMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isClosedMap
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOpen.inv (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem IsClosed.inv (hs : IsClosed s) : IsClosed s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_closure : ∀ s : Set G, (closure s)⁻¹ = closure s⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).preimage_closure
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuous_inv_iff : Continuous f⁻¹ ↔ Continuous f := (Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuous_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousAt_inv_iff : ContinuousAt f⁻¹ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousAt_iff _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousOn_inv_iff : ContinuousOn f⁻¹ s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Continuous.of_inv, _⟩ := continuous_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousAt.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousAt_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousOn.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousOn_inv_iff
end ContinuousInvolutiveInv
section LatticeOps
variable {ι' : Sort*} [Inv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @ContinuousInv G t _) : @ContinuousInv G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ continuous_inv :=
continuous_sInf_rng.2 fun t ht =>
continuous_sInf_dom ht (@ContinuousInv.continuous_inv G t _ (h t ht)) }
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_iInf {ts' : ι' → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @ContinuousInv G (ts' i) _) : @ContinuousInv G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact continuousInv_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @ContinuousInv G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @ContinuousInv G t₂ _) : @ContinuousInv G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine continuousInv_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
@[to_additive]
theorem Topology.IsInducing.continuousInv {G H : Type*} [Inv G] [Inv H] [TopologicalSpace G]
[TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousInv H] {f : G → H} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hf_inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) : ContinuousInv G :=
⟨hf.continuous_iff.2 <| by simpa only [Function.comp_def, hf_inv] using hf.continuous.inv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.continuousInv := IsInducing.continuousInv
section IsTopologicalGroup
/-!
### Topological groups
A topological group is a group in which the multiplication and inversion operations are
continuous. Topological additive groups are defined in the same way. Equivalently, we can require
that the division operation `x y ↦ x * y⁻¹` (resp., subtraction) is continuous.
-/
section Conj
instance ConjAct.units_continuousConstSMul {M} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] : ContinuousConstSMul (ConjAct Mˣ) M :=
⟨fun _ => (continuous_const.mul continuous_id).mul continuous_const⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [Mul G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `mul` and `inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive continuous_addConj_prod
"Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj_prod [ContinuousInv G] :
Continuous fun g : G × G => g.fst * g.snd * g.fst⁻¹ :=
continuous_mul.mul (continuous_inv.comp continuous_fst)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_conj_sum := IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_addConj_prod
/-- Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `mul` is continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `add` is continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj (g : G) : Continuous fun h : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right g⁻¹).comp (continuous_mul_left g)
/-- Conjugation acting on fixed element of the group is continuous when both `mul` and
`inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation acting on fixed element of the additive group is continuous when both
`add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj' [ContinuousInv G] (h : G) :
Continuous fun g : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right h).mul continuous_inv
end Conj
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G}
{s : Set α} {x : α}
instance : IsTopologicalGroup (ULift G) where
section ZPow
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem continuous_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, Continuous fun a : G => a ^ z
| Int.ofNat n => by simpa using continuous_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => by simpa using (continuous_pow (n + 1)).inv
instance AddGroup.continuousConstSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousConstSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_zsmul⟩
instance AddGroup.continuousSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_prod_of_discrete_left.mpr continuous_zsmul⟩
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem Continuous.zpow {f : α → G} (h : Continuous f) (z : ℤ) : Continuous fun b => f b ^ z :=
(continuous_zpow z).comp h
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_zpow {s : Set G} (z : ℤ) : ContinuousOn (fun x => x ^ z) s :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_zpow (x : G) (z : ℤ) : ContinuousAt (fun x => x ^ z) x :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.zpow {α} {l : Filter α} {f : α → G} {x : G} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(z : ℤ) : Tendsto (fun x => f x ^ z) l (𝓝 (x ^ z)) :=
(continuousAt_zpow _ _).tendsto.comp hf
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(z : ℤ) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ z) s x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x ^ z) x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousOn.zpow {f : α → G} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ z) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).zpow z
end ZPow
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [CommGroup H] [PartialOrder H] [IsOrderedMonoid H] [ContinuousInv H]
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) (𝓝[<] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) (𝓝[>] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a) (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a) (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≤] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≥] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv
end OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instIsTopologicalGroup [TopologicalSpace H] [Group H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] :
IsTopologicalGroup (G × H) where
continuous_inv := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instIsTopologicalGroup : IsTopologicalGroup Gᵒᵈ where
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.topologicalGroup {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, TopologicalSpace (C b)] [∀ b, Group (C b)]
[∀ b, IsTopologicalGroup (C b)] : IsTopologicalGroup (∀ b, C b) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] [ContinuousInv α] : ContinuousInv αᵐᵒᵖ :=
opHomeomorph.symm.isInducing.continuousInv unop_inv
/-- If multiplication is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[to_additive "If addition is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵃᵒᵖ`."]
instance [Group α] [IsTopologicalGroup α] : IsTopologicalGroup αᵐᵒᵖ where
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm : comap Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).comap_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm' : map Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_nhds_one {S : Set G} (hS : S ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G)) : S⁻¹ ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
rwa [← nhds_one_symm'] at hS
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x * y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping."]
protected def Homeomorph.shearMulRight : G × G ≃ₜ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
continuous_toFun := by dsimp; fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by dsimp; fun_prop }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G) = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_symm_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G).symm = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2) :=
rfl
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.topologicalGroup {F : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : IsInducing f) : IsTopologicalGroup H :=
{ toContinuousMul := hf.continuousMul _
toContinuousInv := hf.continuousInv (map_inv f) }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.topologicalGroup := IsInducing.topologicalGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_induced {F : Type*} [Group H] [FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G]
(f : F) :
@IsTopologicalGroup H (induced f ‹_›) _ :=
letI := induced f ‹_›
IsInducing.topologicalGroup f ⟨rfl⟩
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance (S : Subgroup G) : IsTopologicalGroup S :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.topologicalGroup S.subtype
end Subgroup
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subgroup of a topological group is
itself a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The (topological-space) closure of an additive subgroup of an additive topological group is
itself an additive subgroup."]
def Subgroup.topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
carrier := _root_.closure (s : Set G)
inv_mem' := fun {g} hg => by simpa only [← Set.mem_inv, inv_closure, inv_coe_set] using hg }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe {s : Subgroup G} :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.le_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
_root_.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set G) := isClosed_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Subgroup G) {t : Subgroup G} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set G)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
@[to_additive]
theorem DenseRange.topologicalClosure_map_subgroup [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[IsTopologicalGroup H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Continuous f) (hf' : DenseRange f) {s : Subgroup G}
(hs : s.topologicalClosure = ⊤) : (s.map f).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff] at hs ⊢
simp only [Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe, Subgroup.coe_top, ← dense_iff_closure_eq] at hs ⊢
exact hf'.dense_image hf hs
/-- The topological closure of a normal subgroup is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The topological closure of a normal additive subgroup is normal."]
theorem Subgroup.is_normal_topologicalClosure {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] :
(Subgroup.topologicalClosure N).Normal where
conj_mem n hn g := by
apply map_mem_closure (IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj g) hn
exact fun m hm => Subgroup.Normal.conj_mem inferInstance m hm g
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G]
[ContinuousMul G] {g h : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G))
(hh : h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) : g * h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [connectedComponent_eq hg]
have hmul : g ∈ connectedComponent (g * h) := by
apply Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset (continuous_mul_left g)
rw [← connectedComponent_eq hh]
exact ⟨(1 : G), mem_connectedComponent, by simp only [mul_one]⟩
simpa [← connectedComponent_eq hmul] using mem_connectedComponent
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [DivisionMonoid G]
[ContinuousInv G] {g : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) :
g⁻¹ ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [← inv_one]
exact
Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset continuous_inv _
((Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩)
/-- The connected component of 1 is a subgroup of `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The connected component of 0 is a subgroup of `G`."]
def Subgroup.connectedComponentOfOne (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] : Subgroup G where
carrier := connectedComponent (1 : G)
one_mem' := mem_connectedComponent
mul_mem' hg hh := mul_mem_connectedComponent_one hg hh
inv_mem' hg := inv_mem_connectedComponent_one hg
/-- If a subgroup of a topological group is commutative, then so is its topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"If a subgroup of an additive topological group is commutative, then so is its
topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]."]
abbrev Subgroup.commGroupTopologicalClosure [T2Space G] (s : Subgroup G)
(hs : ∀ x y : s, x * y = y * x) : CommGroup s.topologicalClosure :=
{ s.topologicalClosure.toGroup, s.toSubmonoid.commMonoidTopologicalClosure hs with }
variable (G) in
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.coe_topologicalClosure_bot :
((⊥ : Subgroup G).topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure ({1} : Set G) := by simp
@[to_additive exists_nhds_half_neg]
theorem exists_nhds_split_inv {s : Set G} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), ∀ v ∈ V, ∀ w ∈ V, v / w ∈ s := by
have : (fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2⁻¹) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 ((1, 1) : G × G) :=
continuousAt_fst.mul continuousAt_snd.inv (by simpa)
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_self_iff, prod_subset_iff, mem_preimage] using
this
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_mul_inv (x : G) : comap (· * x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight x⁻¹).comap_nhds_eq 1).trans <| show 𝓝 (1 * x⁻¹⁻¹) = 𝓝 x by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds (x y : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (x * y) :=
(Homeomorph.mulLeft x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds_one (x : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds (x y : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (y * x) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds_one (x : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_of_one {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set G}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓝 1 : Filter G) p s) (x : G) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) p fun i => { y | y / x ∈ s i } := by
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv]
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hb.comap _
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_one {x : G} {s : Set G} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ U ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G), ∃ y ∈ s, y / x ∈ U := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis ((𝓝 1 : Filter G).basis_sets.nhds_of_one x)]
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, id]
/-- A monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements `MonoidHomClass`) from a
topological group to a topological monoid is continuous provided that it is continuous at one. See
also `uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements
`AddMonoidHomClass`) from an additive topological group to an additive topological monoid is
continuous provided that it is continuous at zero. See also
`uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero`."]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one {M hom : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [FunLike hom G M] [MonoidHomClass hom G M] (f : hom)
(hf : ContinuousAt f 1) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def,
map_mul, map_one, mul_one] using hf.tendsto.const_mul (f x)
@[to_additive continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one₂ {H M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] (f : G →* H →* M)
(hf : ContinuousAt (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) (1, 1))
(hl : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (f x) 1) (hr : ∀ y, ContinuousAt (f · y) 1) :
Continuous (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) := continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun (x, y) => by
simp only [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one y,
prod_map_map_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, map_mul, MonoidHom.mul_apply] at *
refine ((tendsto_const_nhds.mul ((hr y).comp tendsto_fst)).mul
(((hl x).comp tendsto_snd).mul hf)).mono_right (le_of_eq ?_)
simp only [map_one, mul_one, MonoidHom.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsTopologicalGroup.isInducing_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] {F : Type*}
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
Topology.IsInducing f ↔ 𝓝 (1 : G) = (𝓝 (1 : H)).comap f := by
rw [Topology.isInducing_iff_nhds]
refine ⟨(map_one f ▸ · 1), fun hf x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv, ← nhds_translation_mul_inv (f x), Filter.comap_comap, hf,
Filter.comap_comap]
congr 1
ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma TopologicalGroup.isOpenMap_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousConstSMul H H]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ 𝓝 1 ≤ .map f (𝓝 1) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ map_one f ▸ H.nhds_le 1, fun h ↦ IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_⟩
have : Filter.map (f x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (f x) := by
simpa [-Homeomorph.map_nhds_eq, Units.smul_def] using
(Homeomorph.smul ((toUnits x).map (MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom f))).map_nhds_eq (1 : H)
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def, ← this]
refine (Filter.map_mono h).trans ?_
simp [Function.comp_def]
-- TODO: unify with `QuotientGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk`
/-- Let `A` and `B` be topological groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous surjective group
homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map. -/
@[to_additive "Let `A` and `B` be topological additive groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous
surjective additive group homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map."]
lemma MonoidHom.isOpenQuotientMap_of_isQuotientMap {A : Type*} [Group A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A] {B : Type*} [Group B] [TopologicalSpace B]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [MonoidHomClass F A B] {φ : F}
(hφ : IsQuotientMap φ) : IsOpenQuotientMap φ where
surjective := hφ.surjective
continuous := hφ.continuous
isOpenMap := by
-- We need to check that if `U ⊆ A` is open then `φ⁻¹ (φ U)` is open.
intro U hU
rw [← hφ.isOpen_preimage]
-- It suffices to show that `φ⁻¹ (φ U) = ⋃ (U * k⁻¹)` as `k` runs through the kernel of `φ`,
-- as `U * k⁻¹` is open because `x ↦ x * k` is continuous.
-- Remark: here is where we use that we have groups not monoids (you cannot avoid
-- using both `k` and `k⁻¹` at this point).
suffices ⇑φ ⁻¹' (⇑φ '' U) = ⋃ k ∈ ker (φ : A →* B), (fun x ↦ x * k) ⁻¹' U by
exact this ▸ isOpen_biUnion (fun k _ ↦ Continuous.isOpen_preimage (by fun_prop) _ hU)
ext x
-- But this is an elementary calculation.
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hyU, hyx⟩
apply Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem (x⁻¹ * y)
simp_all
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, _, ⟨(hk : φ k = 1), rfl⟩, hx⟩
use x * k, hx
rw [map_mul, hk, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _)
(h : @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1) : t = t' :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t _ _ x, ← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t' _ _ x, ← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _) :
t = t' ↔ @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, tg.ext tg'⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one {G : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x : G => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (fun x : G => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : ContinuousInv G := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x₀ => ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x => x₀⁻¹ * (x₀ * x⁻¹ * x₀⁻¹)) (𝓝 1) (map (x₀⁻¹ * ·) (𝓝 1)) :=
(tendsto_map.comp <| hconj x₀).comp hinv
simpa only [ContinuousAt, hleft x₀, hleft x₀⁻¹, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_left] using this
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hright : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x * x₀) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
{ toContinuousMul := ContinuousMul.of_nhds_one hmul hleft hright
toContinuousInv :=
ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one hinv hleft fun x₀ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [show (fun x => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) = (fun x => x * x₀⁻¹) ∘ fun x => x₀ * x from rfl, ←
map_map, ← hleft, hright, map_map]
simp [(· ∘ ·)]) }
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G := by
refine IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' hmul hinv hleft fun x₀ => ?_
replace hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, map (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 1 :=
fun x₀ => map_eq_of_inverse (x₀⁻¹ * · * x₀⁻¹⁻¹) (by ext; simp [mul_assoc]) (hconj _) (hconj _)
rw [← hconj x₀]
simpa [Function.comp_def] using hleft _
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_comm_of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [CommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one hmul hinv hleft (by simpa using tendsto_id)
variable (G) in
/-- Any first countable topological group has an antitone neighborhood basis `u : ℕ → Set G` for
which `(u (n + 1)) ^ 2 ⊆ u n`. The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for
`QuotientGroup.completeSpace` -/
@[to_additive
"Any first countable topological additive group has an antitone neighborhood basis
`u : ℕ → set G` for which `u (n + 1) + u (n + 1) ⊆ u n`.
The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace`"]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.exists_antitone_basis_nhds_one [FirstCountableTopology G] :
∃ u : ℕ → Set G, (𝓝 1).HasAntitoneBasis u ∧ ∀ n, u (n + 1) * u (n + 1) ⊆ u n := by
rcases (𝓝 (1 : G)).exists_antitone_basis with ⟨u, hu, u_anti⟩
have :=
((hu.prod_nhds hu).tendsto_iff hu).mp
(by simpa only [mul_one] using continuous_mul.tendsto ((1, 1) : G × G))
simp only [and_self_iff, mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, exists_true_left, Prod.exists,
forall_true_left] at this
| have event_mul : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ m in atTop, u m * u m ⊆ u n := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 887 | 887 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
/-!
# The ideal class group
This file defines the ideal class group `ClassGroup R` of fractional ideals of `R`
inside its field of fractions.
## Main definitions
- `toPrincipalIdeal` sends an invertible `x : K` to an invertible fractional ideal
- `ClassGroup` is the quotient of invertible fractional ideals modulo `toPrincipalIdeal.range`
- `ClassGroup.mk0` sends a nonzero integral ideal in a Dedekind domain to its class
## Main results
- `ClassGroup.mk0_eq_mk0_iff` shows the equivalence with the "classical" definition,
where `I ~ J` iff `x I = y J` for `x y ≠ (0 : R)`
## Implementation details
The definition of `ClassGroup R` involves `FractionRing R`. However, the API should be completely
identical no matter the choice of field of fractions for `R`.
-/
variable {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open IsLocalization IsFractionRing FractionalIdeal Units
section
variable (R K)
/-- `toPrincipalIdeal R K x` sends `x ≠ 0 : K` to the fractional `R`-ideal generated by `x` -/
irreducible_def toPrincipalIdeal : Kˣ →* (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ :=
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨spanSingleton _ x, spanSingleton _ x⁻¹, by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.mul_inv', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton], by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.inv_mul', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]⟩
map_mul' := fun x y =>
ext (by simp only [Units.val_mk, Units.val_mul, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton])
map_one' := ext (by simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.val_mk, Units.val_one]) }
variable {R K}
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPrincipalIdeal (x : Kˣ) :
(toPrincipalIdeal R K x : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = spanSingleton _ (x : K) := by
simp only [toPrincipalIdeal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPrincipalIdeal_eq_iff {I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ} {x : Kˣ} :
toPrincipalIdeal R K x = I ↔ spanSingleton R⁰ (x : K) = I := by
simp only [toPrincipalIdeal]; exact Units.ext_iff
theorem mem_principal_ideals_iff {I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ} :
I ∈ (toPrincipalIdeal R K).range ↔ ∃ x : K, spanSingleton R⁰ x = I := by
simp only [MonoidHom.mem_range, toPrincipalIdeal_eq_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
· exact ⟨x, hx⟩
| · refine ⟨Units.mk0 x ?_, hx⟩
rintro rfl
simp [I.ne_zero.symm] at hx
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ClassGroup.lean | 67 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six (f : Fin 6 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven (f : Fin 7 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight (f : Fin 8 → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_const (n : ℕ) (x : M) : ∏ _i : Fin n, x = x ^ n := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_zero {v : Fin n.succ → M} :
∏ i ∈ Ioi 0, v i = ∏ j : Fin n, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_zero_eq_map, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) (v : Fin n.succ → M) :
∏ j ∈ Ioi i.succ, v j = ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, v j.succ := by
rw [← map_succEmb_Ioi, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_congr' {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin b → M) (h : a = b) :
(∏ i : Fin a, f (i.cast h)) = ∏ i : Fin b, f i := by
subst h
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_add {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = (∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i)) * ∏ i : Fin b, f (natAdd a i) := by
rw [Fintype.prod_equiv finSumFinEquiv.symm f fun i => f (finSumFinEquiv.toFun i)]
· apply Fintype.prod_sum_type
· intro x
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_trunc {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) (hf : ∀ j : Fin b, f (natAdd a j) = 1) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = ∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i) := by
rw [prod_univ_add, Fintype.prod_eq_one _ hf, mul_one]
end CommMonoid
theorem sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (a b : R) :
(∑ s : Finset (Fin n), a ^ s.card * b ^ (n - s.card)) = (a + b) ^ n := by
simpa using Fintype.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow (Fin n) a b
lemma sum_neg_one_pow (R : Type*) [Ring R] (m : ℕ) :
(∑ n : Fin m, (-1) ^ n.1 : R) = if Even m then 0 else 1 := by
induction m with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
| simp only [Fin.sum_univ_castSucc, Fin.coe_castSucc, IH, Fin.val_last,
Nat.even_add_one, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· simp [*]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 200 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
| -- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 445 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Geißer, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DiophantineApproximation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
/-!
# Pell's Equation
*Pell's Equation* is the equation $x^2 - d y^2 = 1$, where $d$ is a positive integer
that is not a square, and one is interested in solutions in integers $x$ and $y$.
In this file, we aim at providing all of the essential theory of Pell's Equation for general $d$
(as opposed to the contents of `NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic`, which is specific to the case
$d = a^2 - 1$ for some $a > 1$).
We begin by defining a type `Pell.Solution₁ d` for solutions of the equation,
show that it has a natural structure as an abelian group, and prove some basic
properties.
We then prove the following
**Theorem.** Let $d$ be a positive integer that is not a square. Then the equation
$x^2 - d y^2 = 1$ has a nontrivial (i.e., with $y \ne 0$) solution in integers.
See `Pell.exists_of_not_isSquare` and `Pell.Solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare`.
We then define the *fundamental solution* to be the solution
with smallest $x$ among all solutions satisfying $x > 1$ and $y > 0$.
We show that every solution is a power (in the sense of the group structure mentioned above)
of the fundamental solution up to a (common) sign,
see `Pell.IsFundamental.eq_zpow_or_neg_zpow`, and that a (positive) solution has this property
if and only if it is fundamental, see `Pell.pos_generator_iff_fundamental`.
## References
* [K. Ireland, M. Rosen, *A classical introduction to modern number theory*
(Section 17.5)][IrelandRosen1990]
## Tags
Pell's equation
## TODO
* Extend to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = -1` and further generalizations.
* Connect solutions to the continued fraction expansion of `√d`.
-/
namespace Pell
/-!
### Group structure of the solution set
We define a structure of a commutative multiplicative group with distributive negation
on the set of all solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
The type of such solutions is `Pell.Solution₁ d`. It corresponds to a pair of integers `x` and `y`
and a proof that `(x, y)` is indeed a solution.
The multiplication is given by `(x, y) * (x', y') = (x*y' + d*y*y', x*y' + y*x')`.
This is obtained by mapping `(x, y)` to `x + y*√d` and multiplying the results.
In fact, we define `Pell.Solution₁ d` to be `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))` and transport
the "commutative group with distributive negation" structure from `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))`.
We then set up an API for `Pell.Solution₁ d`.
-/
open CharZero Zsqrtd
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm one (i.e., `a.re^2 - d*a.im^2 = 1`) if and only if
it is contained in the submonoid of unitary elements.
TODO: merge this result with `Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary`. -/
theorem is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} :
a.re ^ 2 - d * a.im ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary, norm_def, sq, sq, ← mul_assoc]
-- We use `solution₁ d` to allow for a more general structure `solution d m` that
-- encodes solutions to `x^2 - d*y^2 = m` to be added later.
/-- `Pell.Solution₁ d` is the type of solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
We define this in terms of elements of `ℤ√d` of norm one.
-/
def Solution₁ (d : ℤ) : Type :=
↥(unitary (ℤ√d))
namespace Solution₁
variable {d : ℤ}
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (CommGroup (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance instHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (HasDistribNeg (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance : Coe (Solution₁ d) (ℤ√d) where coe := Subtype.val
/-- The `x` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def x (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).re
/-- The `y` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def y (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).im
/-- The proof that `a` is a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
theorem prop (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 - d * a.y ^ 2 = 1 :=
is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mpr a.property
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `x^2`. -/
theorem prop_x (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 = 1 + d * a.y ^ 2 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `d * y^2`. -/
theorem prop_y (a : Solution₁ d) : d * a.y ^ 2 = a.x ^ 2 - 1 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
/-- Two solutions are equal if their `x` and `y` components are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : Solution₁ d} (hx : a.x = b.x) (hy : a.y = b.y) : a = b :=
Subtype.ext <| Zsqrtd.ext hx hy
/-- Construct a solution from `x`, `y` and a proof that the equation is satisfied. -/
def mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : Solution₁ d where
val := ⟨x, y⟩
property := is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mp prop
@[simp]
theorem x_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).y = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (↑(mk x y prop) : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, y⟩ :=
Zsqrtd.ext (x_mk x y prop) (y_mk x y prop)
@[simp]
theorem x_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).x = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).y = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).x = a.x * b.x + d * (a.y * b.y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).y = a.x * b.y + a.y * b.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.x = a.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.y = -a.y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).x = -a.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).y = -a.y :=
rfl
/-- When `d` is negative, then `x` or `y` must be zero in a solution. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_d_neg (h₀ : d < 0) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x = 0 ∨ a.y = 0 := by
have h := a.prop
contrapose! h
have h1 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.1
have h2 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.2
nlinarith
/-- A solution has `x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem x_ne_zero (h₀ : 0 ≤ d) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx
have h : 0 ≤ d * a.y ^ 2 := mul_nonneg h₀ (sq_nonneg _)
rw [a.prop_y, hx, sq, zero_mul, zero_sub] at h
exact not_le.mpr (neg_one_lt_zero : (-1 : ℤ) < 0) h
/-- A solution with `x > 1` must have `y ≠ 0`. -/
theorem y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : a.y ≠ 0 := by
intro hy
have prop := a.prop
rw [hy, sq (0 : ℤ), zero_mul, mul_zero, sub_zero] at prop
exact lt_irrefl _ (((one_lt_sq_iff₀ <| zero_le_one.trans ha.le).mpr ha).trans_eq prop)
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is positive. -/
theorem d_pos_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : 0 < d := by
refine pos_of_mul_pos_left ?_ (sq_nonneg a.y)
rw [a.prop_y, sub_pos]
exact one_lt_pow₀ ha two_ne_zero
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is not a square. -/
theorem d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : ¬IsSquare d := by
have hp := a.prop
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← sq, ← mul_pow, sq_sub_sq, Int.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_one_or_neg_one] at hp
omega
/-- A solution with `x = 1` is trivial. -/
theorem eq_one_of_x_eq_one (h₀ : d ≠ 0) {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : a.x = 1) : a = 1 := by
have prop := a.prop_y
rw [ha, one_pow, sub_self, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right h₀, sq_eq_zero_iff] at prop
exact ext ha prop
/-- A solution is `1` or `-1` if and only if `y = 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one_iff_y_eq_zero {a : Solution₁ d} : a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ↔ a.y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.elim (fun h => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h], fun H => ?_⟩
have prop := a.prop
rw [H, sq (0 : ℤ), mul_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, sq_eq_one_iff] at prop
exact prop.imp (fun h => ext h H) fun h => ext h H
/-- The set of solutions with `x > 0` is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem x_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (ha : 0 < a.x) (hb : 0 < b.x) : 0 < (a * b).x := by
simp only [x_mul]
refine neg_lt_iff_pos_add'.mp (abs_lt.mp ?_).1
rw [← abs_of_pos ha, ← abs_of_pos hb, ← abs_mul, ← sq_lt_sq, mul_pow a.x, a.prop_x, b.prop_x, ←
sub_pos]
ring_nf
rcases le_or_lt 0 d with h | h
· positivity
· rw [(eq_zero_of_d_neg h a).resolve_left ha.ne', (eq_zero_of_d_neg h b).resolve_left hb.ne']
simp
/-- The set of solutions with `x` and `y` positive is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem y_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (hbx : 0 < b.x)
(hby : 0 < b.y) : 0 < (a * b).y := by
simp only [y_mul]
positivity
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers with natural exponents
have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_pow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℕ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, x_one, zero_lt_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ]; exact x_mul_pos ih hax
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
natural exponents have positive `y`. -/
theorem y_pow_succ_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (n : ℕ) :
0 < (a ^ n.succ).y := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_one, hay]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ']; exact y_mul_pos hax hay (x_pow_pos hax _) ih
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
exponents have positive `y`. -/
theorem y_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) :
0 < (a ^ n).y := by
lift n to ℕ using hn.le
norm_cast at hn ⊢
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
exact y_pow_succ_pos hax hay _
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℤ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
cases n with
| ofNat n =>
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact x_pow_pos hax n
| negSucc n =>
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact x_pow_pos hax (n + 1)
| /-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then the `y` component of any power
has the same sign as the exponent. -/
theorem sign_y_zpow_eq_sign_of_x_pos_of_y_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y)
(n : ℤ) : (a ^ n).y.sign = n.sign := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Pell.lean | 281 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,385 | 3,387 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
| (add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 934 | 935 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Egorov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Complete
/-!
# Convergence in measure
We define convergence in measure which is one of the many notions of convergence in probability.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to converge in measure to some function `g`
if for all `ε > 0`, the measure of the set `{x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}` tends to 0 as `i`
converges along some given filter `l`.
Convergence in measure is most notably used in the formulation of the weak law of large numbers
and is also useful in theorems such as the Vitali convergence theorem. This file provides some
basic lemmas for working with convergence in measure and establishes some relations between
convergence in measure and other notions of convergence.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.TendstoInMeasure (μ : Measure α) (f : ι → α → E) (g : α → E)`: `f` converges
in `μ`-measure to `g`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae`: convergence almost everywhere in a finite
measure space implies convergence in measure.
* `MeasureTheory.TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae`: if `f` is a sequence of functions
which converges in measure to `g`, then `f` has a subsequence which convergence almost
everywhere to `g`.
* `MeasureTheory.exists_seq_tendstoInMeasure_atTop_iff`: for a sequence of functions `f`,
convergence in measure is equivalent to the fact that every subsequence has another subsequence
that converges almost surely.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_eLpNorm`: convergence in Lp implies convergence
in measure.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α ι κ E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- A sequence of functions `f` is said to converge in measure to some function `g` if for all
`ε > 0`, the measure of the set `{x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}` tends to 0 as `i` converges along
some given filter `l`. -/
def TendstoInMeasure [Dist E] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : ι → α → E) (l : Filter ι)
(g : α → E) : Prop :=
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }) l (𝓝 0)
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_norm [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → α → E}
{g : α → E} :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g ↔
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ ‖f i x - g x‖ }) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [TendstoInMeasure, dist_eq_norm]
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_toNNReal [Dist E] [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} {g : α → E} :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g ↔
∀ ε, 0 < ε → Tendsto (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }).toNNReal) l (𝓝 0) := by
have hfin ε i : μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) } ≠ ⊤ :=
measure_ne_top μ {x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)}
refine ⟨fun h ε hε ↦ ?_, fun h ε hε ↦ ?_⟩
· have hf : (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) }).toNNReal) =
ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ (fun i => (μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) })) := rfl
rw [hf, ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal_iff' (hfin ε)]
exact h ε hε
· rw [← ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal_iff ENNReal.zero_ne_top (hfin ε)]
exact h ε hε
lemma TendstoInMeasure.mono [Dist E] {f : ι → α → E} {g : α → E} {u v : Filter ι} (huv : v ≤ u)
(hg : TendstoInMeasure μ f u g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f v g :=
fun ε hε => (hg ε hε).mono_left huv
lemma TendstoInMeasure.comp [Dist E] {f : ι → α → E} {g : α → E} {u : Filter ι}
{v : Filter κ} {ns : κ → ι} (hg : TendstoInMeasure μ f u g) (hns : Tendsto ns v u) :
TendstoInMeasure μ (f ∘ ns) v g := fun ε hε ↦ (hg ε hε).comp hns
namespace TendstoInMeasure
variable [Dist E] {l : Filter ι} {f f' : ι → α → E} {g g' : α → E}
protected theorem congr' (h_left : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_right : g =ᵐ[μ] g')
(h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g' := by
intro ε hε
suffices
(fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f' i x) (g' x) }) =ᶠ[l] fun i => μ { x | ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x) } by
rw [tendsto_congr' this]
exact h_tendsto ε hε
filter_upwards [h_left] with i h_ae_eq
refine measure_congr ?_
filter_upwards [h_ae_eq, h_right] with x hxf hxg
rw [eq_iff_iff]
change ε ≤ dist (f' i x) (g' x) ↔ ε ≤ dist (f i x) (g x)
rw [hxg, hxf]
protected theorem congr (h_left : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_right : g =ᵐ[μ] g')
(h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) : TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g' :=
TendstoInMeasure.congr' (Eventually.of_forall h_left) h_right h_tendsto
theorem congr_left (h : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] f' i) (h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f' l g :=
h_tendsto.congr h EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem congr_right (h : g =ᵐ[μ] g') (h_tendsto : TendstoInMeasure μ f l g) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f l g' :=
h_tendsto.congr (fun _ => EventuallyEq.rfl) h
end TendstoInMeasure
section ExistsSeqTendstoAe
variable [MetricSpace E]
variable {f : ℕ → α → E} {g : α → E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae`. -/
theorem tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae_of_stronglyMeasurable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g := by
refine fun ε hε => ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero.mpr fun δ hδ => ?_
by_cases hδi : δ = ∞
· simp only [hδi, imp_true_iff, le_top, exists_const]
lift δ to ℝ≥0 using hδi
rw [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.coe_pos, ← NNReal.coe_pos] at hδ
obtain ⟨t, _, ht, hunif⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' hf hg hfg hδ
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] at ht
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at hunif
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 (hunif ε hε)
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
suffices { x : α | ε ≤ dist (f n x) (g x) } ⊆ t from (measure_mono this).trans ht
rw [← Set.compl_subset_compl]
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.nmem_setOf_iff, dist_comm, not_le]
exact hN n hn x hx
/-- Convergence a.e. implies convergence in measure in a finite measure space. -/
| theorem tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g := by
have hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ := aestronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto_ae _ hf hfg
refine TendstoInMeasure.congr (fun i => (hf i).ae_eq_mk.symm) hg.ae_eq_mk.symm ?_
refine tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_ae_of_stronglyMeasurable
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConvergenceInMeasure.lean | 143 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by
simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hr, coe_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ h0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b * b⁻¹ = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b⁻¹ * b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b / b = a := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' hb₀ hb
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b / b = a :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' ha₀ ha
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' ha₀ ha]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
protected alias ⟨_, Finiteness.inv_ne_top⟩ := ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1.lt_top (inv_ne_top.mpr h2).lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
protected theorem inv_mul_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ 0) (h2 : x ≠ ∞) :
x⁻¹ * y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ x * z := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left h1 h2, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h1 h2, one_mul]
protected theorem mul_inv_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x * y⁻¹ ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.inv_mul_le_iff h1 h2, mul_comm]
protected theorem div_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem div_le_iff' {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ y * z := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
protected theorem inv_div {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (htop : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) (hzero : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
(a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_zero] at htop
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_top] at hzero
rw [ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.mul_inv htop hzero, mul_comm, inv_inv]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
/-- The inverse map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is an order isomorphism between `ℝ≥0∞` and its `OrderDual` -/
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
@[simp] protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
@[simp] protected lemma mul_inv_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := ENNReal.div_self_le_one
@[simp] protected lemma inv_mul_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≤ 1 := by simp [mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top one_ne_top a.mul_inv_le_one
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≠ ⊤ := by simp [mul_comm]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
theorem le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
exact h r hr
lemma eq_of_forall_nnreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x ↔ ↑r ≤ y) : x = y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).1 hr.le)
(le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).2 hr.le)
theorem le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r → ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
(zero_le r).eq_or_lt.elim (fun h => h ▸ zero_le _) fun h0 => h r h0 hr
theorem eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique <| le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r _ => h r
protected theorem add_div : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
right_distrib a b c⁻¹
protected theorem div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
| ENNReal.add_div.symm
protected theorem div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 450 | 452 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
| (s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 1,139 | 1,140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FintypeCat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.SingleObj
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
/-!
# Matrices over a category.
When `C` is a preadditive category, `Mat_ C` is the preadditive category
whose objects are finite tuples of objects in `C`, and
whose morphisms are matrices of morphisms from `C`.
There is a functor `Mat_.embedding : C ⥤ Mat_ C` sending morphisms to one-by-one matrices.
`Mat_ C` has finite biproducts.
## The additive envelope
We show that this construction is the "additive envelope" of `C`,
in the sense that any additive functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a category `D` with biproducts
lifts to a functor `Mat_.lift F : Mat_ C ⥤ D`,
Moreover, this functor is unique (up to natural isomorphisms) amongst functors `L : Mat_ C ⥤ D`
such that `embedding C ⋙ L ≅ F`.
(As we don't have 2-category theory, we can't explicitly state that `Mat_ C` is
the initial object in the 2-category of categories under `C` which have biproducts.)
As a consequence, when `C` already has finite biproducts we have `Mat_ C ≌ C`.
## Future work
We should provide a more convenient `Mat R`, when `R` is a ring,
as a category with objects `n : FinType`,
and whose morphisms are matrices with components in `R`.
Ideally this would conveniently interact with both `Mat_` and `Matrix`.
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Preadditive
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [Preadditive C]
/-- An object in `Mat_ C` is a finite tuple of objects in `C`.
-/
structure Mat_ where
/-- The index type `ι` -/
ι : Type
[fintype : Fintype ι]
/-- The map from `ι` to objects in `C` -/
X : ι → C
attribute [instance] Mat_.fintype
namespace Mat_
variable {C}
/-- A morphism in `Mat_ C` is a dependently typed matrix of morphisms. -/
def Hom (M N : Mat_ C) : Type v₁ :=
DMatrix M.ι N.ι fun i j => M.X i ⟶ N.X j
namespace Hom
open scoped Classical in
/-- The identity matrix consists of identity morphisms on the diagonal, and zeros elsewhere. -/
def id (M : Mat_ C) : Hom M M := fun i j => if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0
/-- Composition of matrices using matrix multiplication. -/
def comp {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N K) : Hom M K := fun i k =>
∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k
end Hom
section
attribute [local simp] Hom.id Hom.comp
instance : Category.{v₁} (Mat_ C) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp f g := f.comp g
id_comp f := by
classical
simp +unfoldPartialApp [dite_comp]
comp_id f := by
classical
simp +unfoldPartialApp [comp_dite]
assoc f g h := by
apply DMatrix.ext
intros
simp_rw [Hom.comp, sum_comp, comp_sum, Category.assoc]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {M N : Mat_ C} (f g : M ⟶ N) (H : ∀ i j, f i j = g i j) : f = g :=
DMatrix.ext_iff.mp H
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_def (M : Mat_ C) :
(𝟙 M : Hom M M) = fun i j => if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0 :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_apply (M : Mat_ C) (i j : M.ι) :
(𝟙 M : Hom M M) i j = if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_self (M : Mat_ C) (i : M.ι) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M) i i = 𝟙 _ := by simp [id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_of_ne (M : Mat_ C) (i j : M.ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M) i j = 0 := by
simp [id_apply, h]
theorem comp_def {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
f ≫ g = fun i k => ∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) (i k) :
(f ≫ g) i k = ∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k :=
| rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Mat.lean | 141 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Vincent Beffara. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Vincent Beffara, Stefan Kebekus
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DSlope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Uniqueness
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.EventuallyConst
import Mathlib.Topology.Perfect
/-!
# Principle of isolated zeros
This file proves the fact that the zeros of a non-constant analytic function of one variable are
isolated. It also introduces a little bit of API in the `HasFPowerSeriesAt` namespace that is useful
in this setup.
## Main results
* `AnalyticAt.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero` is the main statement that if a function is
analytic at `z₀`, then either it is identically zero in a neighborhood of `z₀`, or it does not
vanish in a punctured neighborhood of `z₀`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd.eqOn_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq` is the identity theorem for analytic
functions: if a function `f` is analytic on a connected set `U` and is zero on a set with an
accumulation point in `U` then `f` is identically `0` on `U`.
## Applications
* Vanishing of products of analytic functions, `eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero`: If `f, g` are
analytic on a neighbourhood of the preconnected open set `U`, and `f • g = 0` on `U`, then either
`f = 0` on `U` or `g = 0` on `U`.
* Preimages of codiscrete sets, `AnalyticOnNhd.preimage_mem_codiscreteWithin`: if `f` is analytic
on a neighbourhood of `U` and not locally constant, then the preimage of any subset codiscrete
within `f '' U` is codiscrete within `U`.
-/
open Filter Function Nat FormalMultilinearSeries EMetric Set
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {s : E} {p q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 𝕜 E} {f g : 𝕜 → E} {n : ℕ} {z z₀ : 𝕜}
namespace HasSum
variable {a : ℕ → E}
theorem hasSum_at_zero (a : ℕ → E) : HasSum (fun n => (0 : 𝕜) ^ n • a n) (a 0) := by
convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 fun b h ↦ _ <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero (hs : HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a m) s)
(ha : ∀ k < n, a k = 0) : ∃ t : E, z ^ n • t = s ∧ HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a (m + n)) t := by
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· simpa
by_cases h : z = 0
· have : s = 0 := hs.unique (by simpa [ha 0 hn, h] using hasSum_at_zero a)
exact ⟨a n, by simp [h, hn.ne', this], by simpa [h] using hasSum_at_zero fun m => a (m + n)⟩
· refine ⟨(z ^ n)⁻¹ • s, by field_simp [smul_smul], ?_⟩
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, z ^ i • a i = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun k hk => by simp [ha k (Finset.mem_range.mp hk)]
have h2 : HasSum (fun m => z ^ (m + n) • a (m + n)) s := by
simpa [h1] using (hasSum_nat_add_iff' n).mpr hs
convert h2.const_smul (z⁻¹ ^ n) using 1
· field_simp [pow_add, smul_smul]
· simp only [inv_pow]
end HasSum
namespace HasFPowerSeriesAt
theorem has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (dslope f z₀) p.fslope z₀ := by
have hpd : deriv f z₀ = p.coeff 1 := hp.deriv
have hp0 : p.coeff 0 = f z₀ := hp.coeff_zero 1
simp only [hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff, apply_eq_pow_smul_coeff, coeff_fslope] at hp ⊢
refine hp.mono fun x hx => ?_
by_cases h : x = 0
· convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 _ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
· have hxx : ∀ n : ℕ, x⁻¹ * x ^ (n + 1) = x ^ n := fun n => by field_simp [h, _root_.pow_succ]
suffices HasSum (fun n => x⁻¹ • x ^ (n + 1) • p.coeff (n + 1)) (x⁻¹ • (f (z₀ + x) - f z₀)) by
simpa [dslope, slope, h, smul_smul, hxx] using this
simpa [hp0] using ((hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr hx).const_smul x⁻¹
theorem has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope (n : ℕ) (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt ((swap dslope z₀)^[n] f) (fslope^[n] p) z₀ := by
induction n generalizing f p with
| zero => exact hp
| succ n ih => simpa using ih (has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope hp)
theorem iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) :
(swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z₀ ≠ 0 := by
rw [← coeff_zero (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp) 1]
simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_order_ne_zero h
theorem eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = (z - z₀) ^ p.order • (swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z := by
have hq := hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff'.mp (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp)
filter_upwards [hq, hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff'.mp hp] with x hx1 hx2
have : ∀ k < p.order, p.coeff k = 0 := fun k hk => by
simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_eq_zero_of_lt_order hk
obtain ⟨s, hs1, hs2⟩ := HasSum.exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero hx2 this
convert hs1.symm
simp only [coeff_iterate_fslope] at hx1
exact hx1.unique hs2
| theorem locally_ne_zero (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ 0 := by
rw [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff]
have h2 := (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp).continuousAt
have h3 := h2.eventually_ne (iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero hp h)
filter_upwards [eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope hp, h3] with z e1 e2 e3
simpa [e1, e2, e3] using pow_ne_zero p.order (sub_ne_zero.mpr e3)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/IsolatedZeros.lean | 108 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Density
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Graph uniformity and uniform partitions
In this file we define uniformity of a pair of vertices in a graph and uniformity of a partition of
vertices of a graph. Both are also known as ε-regularity.
Finsets of vertices `s` and `t` are `ε`-uniform in a graph `G` if their edge density is at most
`ε`-far from the density of any big enough `s'` and `t'` where `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t`.
The definition is pretty technical, but it amounts to the edges between `s` and `t` being "random"
The literature contains several definitions which are equivalent up to scaling `ε` by some constant
when the partition is equitable.
A partition `P` of the vertices is `ε`-uniform if the proportion of non `ε`-uniform pairs of parts
is less than `ε`.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsUniform`: Graph uniformity of a pair of finsets of vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness`: `G.nonuniformWitness ε s t` and `G.nonuniformWitness ε t s`
together witness the non-uniformity of `s` and `t`.
* `Finpartition.nonUniforms`: Non uniform pairs of parts of a partition.
* `Finpartition.IsUniform`: Uniformity of a partition.
* `Finpartition.nonuniformWitnesses`: For each non-uniform pair of parts of a partition, pick
witnesses of non-uniformity and dump them all together.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset
variable {α 𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
/-! ### Graph uniformity -/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : 𝕜) {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- A pair of finsets of vertices is `ε`-uniform (aka `ε`-regular) iff their edge density is close
to the density of any big enough pair of subsets. Intuitively, the edges between them are
random-like. -/
def IsUniform (s t : Finset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s'⦄, s' ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃t'⦄, t' ⊆ t → (#s : 𝕜) * ε ≤ #s' →
(#t : 𝕜) * ε ≤ #t' → |(G.edgeDensity s' t' : 𝕜) - (G.edgeDensity s t : 𝕜)| < ε
variable {G ε}
instance IsUniform.instDecidableRel : DecidableRel (G.IsUniform ε) := by
unfold IsUniform; infer_instance
theorem IsUniform.mono {ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') (hε : IsUniform G ε s t) : IsUniform G ε' s t :=
fun s' hs' t' ht' hs ht => by
refine (hε hs' ht' (le_trans ?_ hs) (le_trans ?_ ht)).trans_le h <;> gcongr
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem IsUniform.symm : Symmetric (IsUniform G ε) := fun s t h t' ht' s' hs' ht hs => by
rw [edgeDensity_comm _ t', edgeDensity_comm _ t]
exact h hs' ht' hs ht
variable (G)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem isUniform_comm : IsUniform G ε s t ↔ IsUniform G ε t s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm, fun h => h.symm⟩
lemma isUniform_one : G.IsUniform (1 : 𝕜) s t := by
intro s' hs' t' ht' hs ht
rw [mul_one] at hs ht
rw [eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs' (Nat.cast_le.1 hs),
eq_of_subset_of_card_le ht' (Nat.cast_le.1 ht), sub_self, abs_zero]
exact zero_lt_one
variable {G}
lemma IsUniform.pos (hG : G.IsUniform ε s t) : 0 < ε :=
not_le.1 fun hε ↦ (hε.trans <| abs_nonneg _).not_lt <| hG (empty_subset _) (empty_subset _)
(by simpa using mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (Nat.cast_nonneg _) hε)
(by simpa using mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (Nat.cast_nonneg _) hε)
@[simp] lemma isUniform_singleton : G.IsUniform ε {a} {b} ↔ 0 < ε := by
refine ⟨IsUniform.pos, fun hε s' hs' t' ht' hs ht ↦ ?_⟩
rw [card_singleton, Nat.cast_one, one_mul] at hs ht
obtain rfl | rfl := Finset.subset_singleton_iff.1 hs'
· replace hs : ε ≤ 0 := by simpa using hs
exact (hε.not_le hs).elim
obtain rfl | rfl := Finset.subset_singleton_iff.1 ht'
· replace ht : ε ≤ 0 := by simpa using ht
exact (hε.not_le ht).elim
· rwa [sub_self, abs_zero]
theorem not_isUniform_zero : ¬G.IsUniform (0 : 𝕜) s t := fun h =>
(abs_nonneg _).not_lt <| h (empty_subset _) (empty_subset _) (by simp) (by simp)
theorem not_isUniform_iff :
¬G.IsUniform ε s t ↔ ∃ s', s' ⊆ s ∧ ∃ t', t' ⊆ t ∧ #s * ε ≤ #s' ∧
#t * ε ≤ #t' ∧ ε ≤ |G.edgeDensity s' t' - G.edgeDensity s t| := by
unfold IsUniform
simp only [not_forall, not_lt, exists_prop, exists_and_left, Rat.cast_abs, Rat.cast_sub]
variable (G)
/-- An arbitrary pair of subsets witnessing the non-uniformity of `(s, t)`. If `(s, t)` is uniform,
returns `(s, t)`. Witnesses for `(s, t)` and `(t, s)` don't necessarily match. See
`SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness`. -/
noncomputable def nonuniformWitnesses (ε : 𝕜) (s t : Finset α) : Finset α × Finset α :=
if h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t then
((not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose, (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose)
else (s, t)
theorem left_nonuniformWitnesses_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 ⊆ s := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.1
theorem left_nonuniformWitnesses_card (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
#s * ε ≤ #(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.1
theorem right_nonuniformWitnesses_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2 ⊆ t := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.1
theorem right_nonuniformWitnesses_card (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
#t * ε ≤ #(G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2 := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.2.1
theorem nonuniformWitnesses_spec (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
ε ≤
|G.edgeDensity (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).2 -
G.edgeDensity s t| := by
rw [nonuniformWitnesses, dif_pos h]
exact (not_isUniform_iff.1 h).choose_spec.2.choose_spec.2.2.2
open scoped Classical in
/-- Arbitrary witness of non-uniformity. `G.nonuniformWitness ε s t` and
`G.nonuniformWitness ε t s` form a pair of subsets witnessing the non-uniformity of `(s, t)`. If
`(s, t)` is uniform, returns `s`. -/
noncomputable def nonuniformWitness (ε : 𝕜) (s t : Finset α) : Finset α :=
if WellOrderingRel s t then (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε s t).1 else (G.nonuniformWitnesses ε t s).2
theorem nonuniformWitness_subset (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) : G.nonuniformWitness ε s t ⊆ s := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
split_ifs
· exact G.left_nonuniformWitnesses_subset h
· exact G.right_nonuniformWitnesses_subset fun i => h i.symm
theorem le_card_nonuniformWitness (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) :
#s * ε ≤ #(G.nonuniformWitness ε s t) := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
split_ifs
· exact G.left_nonuniformWitnesses_card h
· exact G.right_nonuniformWitnesses_card fun i => h i.symm
theorem nonuniformWitness_spec (h₁ : s ≠ t) (h₂ : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) : ε ≤ |G.edgeDensity
(G.nonuniformWitness ε s t) (G.nonuniformWitness ε t s) - G.edgeDensity s t| := by
unfold nonuniformWitness
rcases trichotomous_of WellOrderingRel s t with (lt | rfl | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt, if_neg (asymm lt)]
exact G.nonuniformWitnesses_spec h₂
· cases h₁ rfl
· rw [if_neg (asymm gt), if_pos gt, edgeDensity_comm, edgeDensity_comm _ s]
apply G.nonuniformWitnesses_spec fun i => h₂ i.symm
end SimpleGraph
/-! ### Uniform partitions -/
variable [DecidableEq α] {A : Finset α} (P : Finpartition A) (G : SimpleGraph α)
[DecidableRel G.Adj] {ε δ : 𝕜} {u v : Finset α}
namespace Finpartition
/-- The pairs of parts of a partition `P` which are not `ε`-dense in a graph `G`. Note that we
dismiss the diagonal. We do not care whether `s` is `ε`-dense with itself. -/
def sparsePairs (ε : 𝕜) : Finset (Finset α × Finset α) :=
P.parts.offDiag.filter fun (u, v) ↦ G.edgeDensity u v < ε
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
@[simp]
lemma mk_mem_sparsePairs (u v : Finset α) (ε : 𝕜) :
(u, v) ∈ P.sparsePairs G ε ↔ u ∈ P.parts ∧ v ∈ P.parts ∧ u ≠ v ∧ G.edgeDensity u v < ε := by
rw [sparsePairs, mem_filter, mem_offDiag, and_assoc, and_assoc]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
lemma sparsePairs_mono {ε ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') : P.sparsePairs G ε ⊆ P.sparsePairs G ε' :=
monotone_filter_right _ fun _ ↦ h.trans_lt'
/-- The pairs of parts of a partition `P` which are not `ε`-uniform in a graph `G`. Note that we
dismiss the diagonal. We do not care whether `s` is `ε`-uniform with itself. -/
def nonUniforms (ε : 𝕜) : Finset (Finset α × Finset α) :=
P.parts.offDiag.filter fun (u, v) ↦ ¬G.IsUniform ε u v
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
@[simp] lemma mk_mem_nonUniforms :
(u, v) ∈ P.nonUniforms G ε ↔ u ∈ P.parts ∧ v ∈ P.parts ∧ u ≠ v ∧ ¬G.IsUniform ε u v := by
rw [nonUniforms, mem_filter, mem_offDiag, and_assoc, and_assoc]
theorem nonUniforms_mono {ε ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') : P.nonUniforms G ε' ⊆ P.nonUniforms G ε :=
monotone_filter_right _ fun _ => mt <| SimpleGraph.IsUniform.mono h
theorem nonUniforms_bot (hε : 0 < ε) : (⊥ : Finpartition A).nonUniforms G ε = ∅ := by
rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
rintro ⟨u, v⟩
simp only [mk_mem_nonUniforms, parts_bot, mem_map, not_and,
Classical.not_not, exists_imp]; dsimp
rintro x ⟨_, rfl⟩ y ⟨_,rfl⟩ _
rwa [SimpleGraph.isUniform_singleton]
/-- A finpartition of a graph's vertex set is `ε`-uniform (aka `ε`-regular) iff the proportion of
its pairs of parts that are not `ε`-uniform is at most `ε`. -/
def IsUniform (ε : 𝕜) : Prop :=
(#(P.nonUniforms G ε) : 𝕜) ≤ (#P.parts * (#P.parts - 1) : ℕ) * ε
lemma bot_isUniform (hε : 0 < ε) : (⊥ : Finpartition A).IsUniform G ε := by
rw [Finpartition.IsUniform, Finpartition.card_bot, nonUniforms_bot _ hε, Finset.card_empty,
Nat.cast_zero]
exact mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg _) hε.le
lemma isUniform_one : P.IsUniform G (1 : 𝕜) := by
rw [IsUniform, mul_one, Nat.cast_le]
refine (card_filter_le _
(fun uv => ¬SimpleGraph.IsUniform G 1 (Prod.fst uv) (Prod.snd uv))).trans ?_
rw [offDiag_card, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_one]
variable {P G}
theorem IsUniform.mono {ε ε' : 𝕜} (hP : P.IsUniform G ε) (h : ε ≤ ε') : P.IsUniform G ε' :=
((Nat.cast_le.2 <| card_le_card <| P.nonUniforms_mono G h).trans hP).trans <| by gcongr
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem isUniformOfEmpty (hP : P.parts = ∅) : P.IsUniform G ε := by
simp [IsUniform, hP, nonUniforms]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem nonempty_of_not_uniform (h : ¬P.IsUniform G ε) : P.parts.Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_ne_empty fun h₁ => h <| isUniformOfEmpty h₁
variable (P G ε) (s : Finset α)
/-- A choice of witnesses of non-uniformity among the parts of a finpartition. -/
noncomputable def nonuniformWitnesses : Finset (Finset α) :=
{t ∈ P.parts | s ≠ t ∧ ¬G.IsUniform ε s t}.image (G.nonuniformWitness ε s)
variable {P G ε s} {t : Finset α}
theorem nonuniformWitness_mem_nonuniformWitnesses (h : ¬G.IsUniform ε s t) (ht : t ∈ P.parts)
(hst : s ≠ t) : G.nonuniformWitness ε s t ∈ P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε s :=
mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_filter.2 ⟨ht, hst, h⟩
/-! ### Equipartitions -/
open SimpleGraph in
lemma IsEquipartition.card_interedges_sparsePairs_le' (hP : P.IsEquipartition)
(hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
#((P.sparsePairs G ε).biUnion fun (U, V) ↦ G.interedges U V) ≤ ε * (#A + #P.parts) ^ 2 := by
calc
_ ≤ ∑ UV ∈ P.sparsePairs G ε, (#(G.interedges UV.1 UV.2) : 𝕜) := mod_cast card_biUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑ UV ∈ P.sparsePairs G ε, ε * (#UV.1 * #UV.2) := ?_
_ ≤ _ := sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (filter_subset _ _) fun i _ _ ↦ by positivity
_ = _ := (mul_sum _ _ _).symm
_ ≤ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ hε
· gcongr with UV hUV
obtain ⟨U, V⟩ := UV
simp [mk_mem_sparsePairs, ← card_interedges_div_card] at hUV
refine ((div_lt_iff₀ ?_).1 hUV.2.2.2).le
exact mul_pos (Nat.cast_pos.2 (P.nonempty_of_mem_parts hUV.1).card_pos)
(Nat.cast_pos.2 (P.nonempty_of_mem_parts hUV.2.1).card_pos)
norm_cast
calc
(_ : ℕ) ≤ _ := sum_le_card_nsmul P.parts.offDiag (fun i ↦ #i.1 * #i.2)
((#A / #P.parts + 1)^2 : ℕ) ?_
_ ≤ (#P.parts * (#A / #P.parts) + #P.parts) ^ 2 := ?_
_ ≤ _ := Nat.pow_le_pow_left (add_le_add_right (Nat.mul_div_le _ _) _) _
· simp only [Prod.forall, Finpartition.mk_mem_nonUniforms, and_imp, mem_offDiag, sq]
rintro U V hU hV -
exact_mod_cast Nat.mul_le_mul (hP.card_part_le_average_add_one hU)
(hP.card_part_le_average_add_one hV)
· rw [smul_eq_mul, offDiag_card, Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, ← sq, ← mul_pow, mul_add_one (α := ℕ)]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
lemma IsEquipartition.card_interedges_sparsePairs_le (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
#((P.sparsePairs G ε).biUnion fun (U, V) ↦ G.interedges U V) ≤ 4 * ε * #A ^ 2 := by
calc
_ ≤ _ := hP.card_interedges_sparsePairs_le' hε
_ ≤ ε * (#A + #A)^2 := by gcongr; exact P.card_parts_le_card
_ = _ := by ring
private lemma aux {i j : ℕ} (hj : 0 < j) : j * (j - 1) * (i / j + 1) ^ 2 < (i + j) ^ 2 := by
have : j * (j - 1) < j ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]; exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (Nat.sub_lt hj zero_lt_one) hj
apply (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right this <| pow_pos Nat.succ_pos' _).trans_le
rw [← mul_pow]
exact Nat.pow_le_pow_left (add_le_add_right (Nat.mul_div_le i j) _) _
lemma IsEquipartition.card_biUnion_offDiag_le' (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
(#(P.parts.biUnion offDiag) : 𝕜) ≤ #A * (#A + #P.parts) / #P.parts := by
obtain h | h := P.parts.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [h]
calc
_ ≤ (#P.parts : 𝕜) * (↑(#A / #P.parts) * ↑(#A / #P.parts + 1)) :=
mod_cast card_biUnion_le_card_mul _ _ _ fun U hU ↦ ?_
_ = #P.parts * ↑(#A / #P.parts) * ↑(#A / #P.parts + 1) := by rw [mul_assoc]
_ ≤ #A * (#A / #P.parts + 1) :=
mul_le_mul (mod_cast Nat.mul_div_le _ _) ?_ (by positivity) (by positivity)
_ = _ := by rw [← div_add_same (mod_cast h.card_pos.ne'), mul_div_assoc]
· simpa using Nat.cast_div_le
suffices (#U - 1) * #U ≤ #A / #P.parts * (#A / #P.parts + 1) by
rwa [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, one_mul, ← offDiag_card] at this
have := hP.card_part_le_average_add_one hU
refine Nat.mul_le_mul ((Nat.sub_le_sub_right this 1).trans ?_) this
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, card_univ, le_rfl]
lemma IsEquipartition.card_biUnion_offDiag_le (hε : 0 < ε) (hP : P.IsEquipartition)
(hP' : 4 / ε ≤ #P.parts) : #(P.parts.biUnion offDiag) ≤ ε / 2 * #A ^ 2 := by
| obtain rfl | hA : A = ⊥ ∨ _ := A.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Subsingleton.elim P ⊥]
apply hP.card_biUnion_offDiag_le'.trans
rw [div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 (P.parts_nonempty hA.ne_empty).card_pos)]
have : (#A : 𝕜) + #P.parts ≤ 2 * #A := by
rw [two_mul]; exact add_le_add_left (Nat.cast_le.2 P.card_parts_le_card) _
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Uniform.lean | 334 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Circulant matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about circulant matrices.
Given a vector `v : n → α` indexed by a type that is endowed with subtraction,
`Matrix.circulant v` is the matrix whose `(i, j)`th entry is `v (i - j)`.
## Main results
- `Matrix.circulant`: the circulant matrix generated by a given vector `v : n → α`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul`: the product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul_comm`: multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do.
## Implementation notes
`Matrix.Fin.foo` is the `Fin n` version of `Matrix.foo`.
Namely, the index type of the circulant matrices in discussion is `Fin n`.
## Tags
circulant, matrix
-/
variable {α β n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
/-- Given the condition `[Sub n]` and a vector `v : n → α`,
we define `circulant v` to be the circulant matrix generated by `v` of type `Matrix n n α`.
The `(i,j)`th entry is defined to be `v (i - j)`. -/
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
theorem circulant_injective [SubtractionMonoid n] :
Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
@[simp]
theorem circulant_inj [SubtractionMonoid n] {v w : n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
circulant_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Fin.circulant_inj {n} {v w : Fin n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
(Fin.circulant_injective n).eq_iff
theorem transpose_circulant [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i) := by ext; simp
theorem conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i)) := by ext; simp
theorem Fin.transpose_circulant : ∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.transpose_circulant
theorem Fin.conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] :
∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i))
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.conjTranspose_circulant
theorem map_circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) (f : α → β) :
(circulant v).map f = circulant fun i => f (v i) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_neg [Neg α] [Sub n] (v : n → α) : circulant (-v) = -circulant v :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_zero (α n) [Zero α] [Sub n] : circulant 0 = (0 : Matrix n n α) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_add [Add α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v + w) = circulant v + circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_sub [Sub α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v - w) = circulant v - circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`. -/
theorem circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [Fintype n] [AddGroup n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w) := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, mulVec, circulant_apply, dotProduct]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.subRight j) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.subRight_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Fin.circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul
/-- Multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do. -/
theorem circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] [Fintype n] [AddCommGroup n]
(v w : n → α) : circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, circulant_apply, mul_comm]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv ((Equiv.subLeft i).trans (Equiv.addRight j)) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.subLeft_apply, Equiv.coe_addRight, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_comm]
congr 2
abel
theorem Fin.circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul_comm
/-- `k • circulant v` is another circulant matrix `circulant (k • v)`. -/
theorem circulant_smul [Sub n] [SMul R α] (k : R) (v : n → α) :
circulant (k • v) = k • circulant v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single_one (α n) [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] :
circulant (Pi.single 0 1 : n → α) = (1 : Matrix n n α) := by
ext i j
simp [one_apply, Pi.single_apply, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single (n) [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] [Fintype n] (a : α) :
circulant (Pi.single 0 a : n → α) = scalar n a := by
ext i j
simp [Pi.single_apply, diagonal_apply, sub_eq_zero]
/-- Note we use `↑i = 0` instead of `i = 0` as `Fin 0` has no `0`.
This means that we cannot state this with `Pi.single` as we did with `Matrix.circulant_single`. -/
theorem Fin.circulant_ite (α) [Zero α] [One α] :
∀ n, circulant (fun i => ite (i.1 = 0) 1 0 : Fin n → α) = 1
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| n + 1 => by
rw [← circulant_single_one]
congr with j
simp [Pi.single_apply]
/-- A circulant of `v` is symmetric iff `v` equals its reverse. -/
theorem circulant_isSymm_iff [SubtractionMonoid n] {v : n → α} :
(circulant v).IsSymm ↔ ∀ i, v (-i) = v i := by
rw [IsSymm, transpose_circulant, circulant_inj, funext_iff]
theorem Fin.circulant_isSymm_iff : ∀ {n} {v : Fin n → α}, (circulant v).IsSymm ↔ ∀ i, v (-i) = v i
| 0 => by simp [IsSymm.ext_iff, IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_isSymm_iff
|
/-- If `circulant v` is symmetric, `∀ i j : I, v (- i) = v i`. -/
theorem circulant_isSymm_apply [SubtractionMonoid n] {v : n → α} (h : (circulant v).IsSymm)
(i : n) : v (-i) = v i :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 174 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
|
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 458 | 459 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
|
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 163 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 639 | 642 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,654 | 2,655 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
(hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α]
(hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
theorem cycleOf_one [DecidableRel (1 : Perm α).SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf 1 x = 1 := (cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (hx : f x ≠ x) :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
theorem pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % orderOf (cycleOf f x))) x = (f ^ n) x := by
rw [← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self f, pow_mod_orderOf]
theorem cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
[DecidableRel (f * g).SameCycle]
(h : Commute f g) (x : α) (hx : g x = x) : (f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x := by
ext y
by_cases hxy : (f * g).SameCycle x y
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self]
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy, cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle]
contrapose! hxy
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hxy
refine ⟨z, ?_⟩
simp [h.mul_zpow, zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hx]
theorem Disjoint.cycleOf_mul_distrib [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableRel g.SameCycle]
[DecidableRel (f * g).SameCycle] [DecidableRel (g * f).SameCycle] (h : f.Disjoint g) (x : α) :
(f * g).cycleOf x = f.cycleOf x * g.cycleOf x := by
rcases (disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq.mp h) x with hfx | hgx
· simp [h.commute.eq, cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.symm.commute, hfx]
· simp [cycleOf_mul_of_apply_right_eq_self h.commute, hgx]
private theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y ∧ x ∈ support f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [(cycleOf_eq_one_iff _).mpr hx]
simp [hx]
· rw [mem_support, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hy
· simp only [hx, hy, Ne, not_false_iff, and_self_iff, mem_support]
rcases hy with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [← not_mem_support]
simpa using hx
· simpa [hx] using hy
private theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux (hx : f x ≠ x)
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux, and_iff_left (mem_support.2 hx)]
/-- `x` is in the support of `f` iff `Equiv.Perm.cycle_of f x` is a cycle. -/
theorem isCycle_cycleOf_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, f.isCycle_cycleOf⟩
rw [Ne, ← cycleOf_eq_one_iff f]
exact hx.ne_one
private theorem isCycleOn_support_cycleOf_aux [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α)
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : f.IsCycleOn (f.cycleOf x).support :=
⟨f.bijOn <| by
refine fun _ ↦
⟨fun h ↦ mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.2 ?_, fun h ↦ mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.2 ?_⟩
· exact ⟨sameCycle_apply_right.1 (mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).1,
(mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).2⟩
· exact ⟨sameCycle_apply_right.2 (mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).1,
(mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux.1 h).2⟩
, fun a ha b hb =>
by
rw [mem_coe, mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux] at ha hb
exact ha.1.symm.trans hb.1⟩
private theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support_aux {f} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
[DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : x ∈ f.support) :
∃ i < #(f.cycleOf x).support, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rw [mem_support] at hx
exact Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn.exists_pow_eq (b := y) (f.isCycleOn_support_cycleOf_aux x)
(by rw [mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx]) (by rwa [mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx])
instance instDecidableRelSameCycle [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (y ∈ List.iterate f x (Fintype.card α)) <| by
simp only [List.mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, _, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hn⟩
· intro hxy
by_cases hx : x ∈ f.support
case pos =>
-- we can't invoke the aux lemmas above without obtaining the decidable instance we are
-- already building; but now we've left the data, so we can do this non-constructively
-- without sacrificing computability.
let _inst (f : Perm α) : DecidableRel (SameCycle f) := Classical.decRel _
rcases hxy.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support_aux hx with ⟨i, hixy, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le hixy (card_le_univ _), hi⟩
case neg =>
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨x⟩
rw [not_mem_support] at hx
exact ⟨0, Fintype.card_pos, hxy.eq_of_left hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
2 ≤ #(cycleOf f x).support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simpa using (isCycle_cycleOf _ h).two_le_card_support⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at h
simp [h]
@[simp] lemma support_cycleOf_nonempty [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
(cycleOf f x).support.Nonempty ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [← two_le_card_support_cycleOf_iff, ← card_pos, ← Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => Or.resolve_left h.eq_or_lt (card_support_ne_one _).symm, zero_lt_two.trans_le⟩
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
| y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y ∧ x ∈ support f :=
mem_support_cycleOf_iff_aux
theorem mem_support_cycleOf_iff' (hx : f x ≠ x) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] :
y ∈ support (f.cycleOf x) ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
mem_support_cycleOf_iff'_aux hx
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 269 | 274 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Outer measures from functions
Given an arbitrary function `m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞` that sends `∅` to `0` we can define an outer
measure on `α` that on `s` is defined to be the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (sᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`sᵢ` that cover `s`. This is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most the given function.
Given an outer measure `m`, the Carathéodory-measurable sets are the sets `s` such that
for all sets `t` we have `m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. This forms a measurable space.
## Main definitions and statements
* `OuterMeasure.boundedBy` is the greatest outer measure that is at most the given function.
If you know that the given function sends `∅` to `0`, then `OuterMeasure.ofFunction` is a
special case.
* `sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen` is a characterization of the infimum of outer measures.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carath%C3%A9odory%27s_criterion>
## Tags
outer measure, Carathéodory-measurable, Carathéodory's criterion
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
section OfFunction
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets satisfying `m ∅ = 0`, there is
a unique maximal outer measure `μ` satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. -/
protected def ofFunction (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) : OuterMeasure α :=
let μ s := ⨅ (f : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, f i), ∑' i, m (f i)
{ measureOf := μ
empty :=
le_antisymm
((iInf_le_of_le fun _ => ∅) <| iInf_le_of_le (empty_subset _) <| by simp [m_empty])
(zero_le _)
mono := fun {_ _} hs => iInf_mono fun _ => iInf_mono' fun hb => ⟨hs.trans hb, le_rfl⟩
iUnion_nat := fun s _ =>
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add <| by
intro ε hε (hb : (∑' i, μ (s i)) < ∞)
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', hε', hl⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hl) _)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_add]
choose f hf using
show ∀ i, ∃ f : ℕ → Set α, (s i ⊆ ⋃ i, f i) ∧ (∑' i, m (f i)) < μ (s i) + ε' i by
intro i
have : μ (s i) < μ (s i) + ε' i :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb.ne <| ENNReal.le_tsum _)
(by simpa using (hε' i).ne')
rcases iInf_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨t, ht⟩
exists t
contrapose! ht
exact le_iInf ht
refine le_trans ?_ (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => le_of_lt (hf i).2)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_prod, ← Nat.pairEquiv.symm.tsum_eq]
refine iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf_le _ ?_)
apply iUnion_subset
intro i
apply Subset.trans (hf i).1
apply iUnion_subset
simp only [Nat.pairEquiv_symm_apply]
rw [iUnion_unpair]
intro j
apply subset_iUnion₂ i }
variable (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0)
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`. -/
theorem ofFunction_apply (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t), ∑' n, m (t n) :=
rfl
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`, with all `tᵢ` satisfying a predicate `P` such that `m` is infinite for sets
that don't satisfy `P`.
This is similar to `ofFunction_apply`, except that the sets `tᵢ` satisfy `P`.
The hypothesis `m_top` applies in particular to a function of the form `extend m'`. -/
theorem ofFunction_eq_iInf_mem {P : Set α → Prop} (m_top : ∀ s, ¬ P s → m s = ∞) (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s =
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : ∀ i, P (t i)) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i), ∑' i, m (t i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.ofFunction_apply]
apply le_antisymm
· exact le_iInf fun t ↦ le_iInf fun _ ↦ le_iInf fun h ↦ iInf₂_le _ (by exact h)
· simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
refine fun t ht_subset ↦ iInf_le_of_le t ?_
by_cases ht : ∀ i, P (t i)
· exact iInf_le_of_le ht (iInf_le_of_le ht_subset le_rfl)
· simp only [ht, not_false_eq_true, iInf_neg, top_le_iff]
push_neg at ht
obtain ⟨i, hti_not_mem⟩ := ht
have hfi_top : m (t i) = ∞ := m_top _ hti_not_mem
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨i, hfi_top⟩
variable {m m_empty}
theorem ofFunction_le (s : Set α) : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s ≤ m s :=
let f : ℕ → Set α := fun i => Nat.casesOn i s fun _ => ∅
iInf_le_of_le f <|
iInf_le_of_le (subset_iUnion f 0) <|
le_of_eq <| tsum_eq_single 0 <| by
rintro (_ | i)
· simp
· simp [f, m_empty]
theorem ofFunction_eq (s : Set α) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : Set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α, m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, m (s i)) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = m s :=
le_antisymm (ofFunction_le s) <|
le_iInf fun f => le_iInf fun hf => le_trans (m_mono hf) (m_subadd f)
theorem le_ofFunction {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s :=
⟨fun H s => le_trans (H s) (ofFunction_le s), fun H _ =>
le_iInf fun f =>
le_iInf fun hs =>
le_trans (μ.mono hs) <| le_trans (measure_iUnion_le f) <| ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => H _⟩
theorem isGreatest_ofFunction :
IsGreatest { μ : OuterMeasure α | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) :=
⟨fun _ => ofFunction_le _, fun _ => le_ofFunction.2⟩
theorem ofFunction_eq_sSup : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty = sSup { μ | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } :=
(@isGreatest_ofFunction α m m_empty).isLUB.sSup_eq.symm
/-- If `m u = ∞` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `m u = ∞` on any set of diameter `≥ r`, then this lemma
implies that `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s`
and `y ∈ t`. -/
theorem ofFunction_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter {s t : Set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (t ∩ u).Nonempty → m u = ∞) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty (s ∪ t) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s + OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_union_le _ _) (le_iInf₂ fun f hf ↦ ?_)
set μ := OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, (s ∩ f i).Nonempty ∧ (t ∩ f i).Nonempty) with (⟨i, hs, ht⟩ | he)
· calc
μ s + μ t ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ = m (f i) := (h (f i) hs ht).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.le_tsum i
set I := fun s => { i : ℕ | (s ∩ f i).Nonempty }
have hd : Disjoint (I s) (I t) := disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun i hi => he ⟨i, hi⟩
have hI : ∀ u ⊆ s ∪ t, μ u ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := fun u hu =>
calc
μ u ≤ μ (⋃ i : I u, f i) :=
μ.mono fun x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hf (hu hx))
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨i, ⟨x, hx, hi⟩⟩, hi⟩
_ ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := measure_iUnion_le _
calc
μ s + μ t ≤ (∑' i : I s, μ (f i)) + ∑' i : I t, μ (f i) :=
add_le_add (hI _ subset_union_left) (hI _ subset_union_right)
_ = ∑' i : ↑(I s ∪ I t), μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun i => μ (f i)) hd ENNReal.summable).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable)
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => ofFunction_le _
theorem comap_ofFunction {β} (f : β → α) (h : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) :
comap f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f '' s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_ofFunction.2 fun s => ?_) fun s => ?_
· rw [comap_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
· rw [comap_apply, ofFunction_apply, ofFunction_apply]
refine iInf_mono' fun t => ⟨fun k => f ⁻¹' t k, ?_⟩
refine iInf_mono' fun ht => ?_
rw [Set.image_subset_iff, preimage_iUnion] at ht
refine ⟨ht, ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_⟩
rcases h with hl | hr
exacts [hl (image_preimage_subset _ _), (congr_arg m (hr.image_preimage (t n))).le]
theorem map_ofFunction_le {β} (f : α → β) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) ≤
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty :=
le_ofFunction.2 fun s => by
rw [map_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
theorem map_ofFunction {β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty := by
refine (map_ofFunction_le _).antisymm fun s => ?_
simp only [ofFunction_apply, map_apply, le_iInf_iff]
intro t ht
refine iInf_le_of_le (fun n => (range f)ᶜ ∪ f '' t n) (iInf_le_of_le ?_ ?_)
· rw [← union_iUnion, ← inter_subset, ← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_iUnion]
exact image_subset _ ht
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => le_of_eq ?_
simp [hf.preimage_image]
-- TODO (kmill): change `m (t ∩ s)` to `m (s ∩ t)`
theorem restrict_ofFunction (s : Set α) (hm : Monotone m) :
restrict s (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun t => m (t ∩ s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
rw [restrict]
simp only [inter_comm _ s, LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [comap_ofFunction _ (Or.inl hm)]
simp only [map_ofFunction Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
theorem smul_ofFunction {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : c • OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (c • m) (by simp [m_empty]) := by
ext1 s
haveI : Nonempty { t : ℕ → Set α // s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i } := ⟨⟨fun _ => s, subset_iUnion (fun _ => s) 0⟩⟩
simp only [smul_apply, ofFunction_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
iInf_subtype']
rw [ENNReal.mul_iInf fun h => (hc h).elim]
end OfFunction
section BoundedBy
variable {α : Type*} (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets, there is a unique maximal outer measure `μ`
satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. This is the same as `OuterMeasure.ofFunction`,
except that it doesn't require `m ∅ = 0`. -/
def boundedBy : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) (by simp [Set.not_nonempty_empty])
variable {m}
theorem boundedBy_le (s : Set α) : boundedBy m s ≤ m s :=
(ofFunction_le _).trans iSup_const_le
| theorem boundedBy_eq_ofFunction (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (s : Set α) :
boundedBy m s = OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s := by
have : (fun s : Set α => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) = m := by
ext1 t
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/OfFunction.lean | 254 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 3,532 | 3,533 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Pointwise convergence of indicator functions
In this file, we prove the equivalence of three different ways to phrase that the indicator
functions of sets converge pointwise.
## Main results
For `A` a set, `(Asᵢ)` an indexed collection of sets, under mild conditions, the following are
equivalent:
(a) the indicator functions of `Asᵢ` tend to the indicator function of `A` pointwise;
(b) for every `x`, we eventually have that `x ∈ Asᵢ` holds iff `x ∈ A` holds;
(c) `Tendsto As _ <| Filter.pi (pure <| · ∈ A)`.
The results stating these in the case when the indicators take values in a Fréchet space are:
* `tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually` is the equivalence (a) ↔ (b);
* `tendsto_indicator_const_iff_tendsto_pi_pure` is the equivalence (a) ↔ (c).
-/
open Filter Topology
variable {α : Type*} {A : Set α}
variable {β : Type*} [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β]
variable {ι : Type*} (L : Filter ι) {As : ι → Set α}
lemma tendsto_ite {β : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {q : Prop} [Decidable q]
{a b : β} {F G : Filter β}
(haG : {a}ᶜ ∈ G) (hbF : {b}ᶜ ∈ F) (haF : principal {a} ≤ F) (hbG : principal {b} ≤ G) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ if p i then a else b) L (if q then F else G) ↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, p i ↔ q := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases hq : q
· simp only [hq, ite_true] at h
filter_upwards [mem_map.mp (h hbF)] with i hi
simp only [Set.preimage_compl, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
ite_eq_right_iff, not_forall, exists_prop] at hi
tauto
· simp only [hq, ite_false] at h
filter_upwards [mem_map.mp (h haG)] with i hi
simp only [Set.preimage_compl, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
ite_eq_left_iff, not_forall, exists_prop] at hi
tauto
· have obs : (fun _ ↦ if q then a else b) =ᶠ[L] (fun i ↦ if p i then a else b) := by
filter_upwards [h] with i hi
simp only [hi]
apply Tendsto.congr' obs
by_cases hq : q
· simp only [hq, iff_true, ite_true]
apply le_trans _ haF
simp only [principal_singleton, le_pure_iff, mem_map, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
Set.preimage_const_of_mem, univ_mem]
· simp only [hq, ite_false]
apply le_trans _ hbG
simp only [principal_singleton, le_pure_iff, mem_map, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
Set.preimage_const_of_mem, univ_mem]
lemma tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' (b : β)
(nhd_b : {0}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 b) (nhd_o : {b}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 0) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x))
↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
classical
have heart := @tendsto_ite ι L β (fun i ↦ x ∈ As i) _ (x ∈ A) _ b 0 (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (0 : β))
nhd_o nhd_b ?_ ?_
· convert heart
by_cases hxA : x ∈ A <;> simp [hxA]
· simp only [principal_singleton, le_def, mem_pure]
exact fun s s_nhd ↦ mem_of_mem_nhds s_nhd
· simp only [principal_singleton, le_def, mem_pure]
exact fun s s_nhd ↦ mem_of_mem_nhds s_nhd
lemma tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually'
(b : β) (nhd_b : {0}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 b) (nhd_o : {b}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)))
↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
simp_rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
apply forall_congr'
exact tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' L b nhd_b nhd_o
|
/-- The indicator functions of `Asᵢ` evaluated at `x` tend to the indicator function of `A`
evaluated at `x` if and only if we eventually have the equivalence `x ∈ Asᵢ ↔ x ∈ A`. -/
@[simp] lemma tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually [T1Space β] (b : β) [NeZero b]
(x : α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x))
↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
apply tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' _ b
· simp only [compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff, ne_eq, NeZero.ne, not_false_eq_true]
| Mathlib/Topology/IndicatorConstPointwise.lean | 90 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arsinh
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Inversion.Basic
/-!
# Metric on the upper half-plane
In this file we define a `MetricSpace` structure on the `UpperHalfPlane`. We use hyperbolic
(Poincaré) distance given by
`dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))` instead of the induced
Euclidean distance because the hyperbolic distance is invariant under holomorphic automorphisms of
the upper half-plane. However, we ensure that the projection to `TopologicalSpace` is
definitionally equal to the induced topological space structure.
We also prove that a metric ball/closed ball/sphere in Poincaré metric is a Euclidean ball/closed
ball/sphere with another center and radius.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Metric Real Set Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane ComplexConjugate NNReal Topology MatrixGroups
variable {z w : ℍ} {r : ℝ}
namespace UpperHalfPlane
instance : Dist ℍ :=
⟨fun z w => 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))⟩
theorem dist_eq (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im))) :=
rfl
theorem sinh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
sinh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [dist_eq, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (arsinh _) two_ne_zero, sinh_arsinh]
theorem cosh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
cosh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) (conj (w : ℂ)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, cosh_sq', sinh_half_dist, div_pow, div_pow, one_add_div, mul_pow, sq_sqrt]
· congr 1
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, Complex.normSq_sub, Complex.normSq_conj,
Complex.conj_conj, Complex.mul_re, Complex.conj_re, Complex.conj_im, coe_im]
ring
all_goals positivity
theorem tanh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
tanh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w) := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_div_div_comm, div_self, div_one]
positivity
theorem exp_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
exp (dist z w / 2) = (dist (z : ℂ) w + dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sinh_add_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, add_div]
theorem cosh_dist (z w : ℍ) : cosh (dist z w) = 1 + dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_eq, cosh_two_mul, cosh_sq', add_assoc, ← two_mul, sinh_arsinh, div_pow, mul_pow,
sq_sqrt, sq (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left] <;> positivity
theorem sinh_half_dist_add_dist (a b c : ℍ) : sinh ((dist a b + dist b c) / 2) =
(dist (a : ℂ) b * dist (c : ℂ) (conj ↑b) + dist (b : ℂ) c * dist (a : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) /
(2 * √(a.im * c.im) * dist (b : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) := by
simp only [add_div _ _ (2 : ℝ), sinh_add, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_mul_div_comm]
rw [← add_div, Complex.dist_self_conj, coe_im, abs_of_pos b.im_pos, mul_comm (dist (b : ℂ) _),
dist_comm (b : ℂ), Complex.dist_conj_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ _ b.im]
congr 2
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, mul_comm (√a.im), mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_self_sqrt,
mul_comm] <;> exact (im_pos _).le
protected theorem dist_comm (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = dist w z := by
simp only [dist_eq, dist_comm (z : ℂ), mul_comm]
theorem dist_le_iff_le_sinh :
dist z w ≤ r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) ≤ sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (zero_lt_two' ℝ), ← sinh_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) = sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_left_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sinh_inj, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sq_sinh (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (4 * z.im * w.im) = sinh (r / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh, ← sq_eq_sq₀, div_pow, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, mul_assoc]
· norm_num
all_goals positivity
protected theorem dist_triangle (a b c : ℍ) : dist a c ≤ dist a b + dist b c := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist_add_dist, div_mul_eq_div_div _ _ (dist _ _), le_div_iff₀,
div_mul_eq_mul_div]
· gcongr
exact EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist (a : ℂ) b c (conj (b : ℂ))
· rw [dist_comm, dist_pos, Ne, Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact b.im_ne_zero
theorem dist_le_dist_coe_div_sqrt (z w : ℍ) : dist z w ≤ dist (z : ℂ) w / √(z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, ← div_mul_eq_div_div_swap, self_le_sinh_iff]
positivity
/-- An auxiliary `MetricSpace` instance on the upper half-plane. This instance has bad projection
to `TopologicalSpace`. We replace it later. -/
def metricSpaceAux : MetricSpace ℍ where
dist := dist
dist_self z := by rw [dist_eq, dist_self, zero_div, arsinh_zero, mul_zero]
dist_comm := UpperHalfPlane.dist_comm
dist_triangle := UpperHalfPlane.dist_triangle
eq_of_dist_eq_zero {z w} h := by
simpa [dist_eq, Real.sqrt_eq_zero', (mul_pos z.im_pos w.im_pos).not_le, Set.ext_iff] using h
open Complex
theorem cosh_dist' (z w : ℍ) :
Real.cosh (dist z w) = ((z.re - w.re) ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2 + w.im ^ 2) / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
field_simp [cosh_dist, Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply]
ring
/-- Euclidean center of the circle with center `z` and radius `r` in the hyperbolic metric. -/
def center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : ℍ :=
⟨⟨z.re, z.im * Real.cosh r⟩, by positivity⟩
@[simp]
theorem center_re (z r) : (center z r).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_im (z r) : (center z r).im = z.im * Real.cosh r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_zero (z : ℍ) : center z 0 = z :=
ext' rfl <| by rw [center_im, Real.cosh_zero, mul_one]
theorem dist_coe_center_sq (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) ^ 2 =
2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2 := by
have H : 2 * z.im * w.im ≠ 0 := by positivity
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply, coe_re, coe_im, center_re, center_im,
cosh_dist', mul_div_cancel₀ _ H, sub_sq z.im, mul_pow, Real.cosh_sq, sub_re, sub_im, mul_sub, ←
sq]
ring
theorem dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) =
√(2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq dist_nonneg, dist_coe_center_sq]
theorem cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
cmp (dist z w) r = cmp (dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r)) (w.im * Real.sinh r) := by
letI := metricSpaceAux
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with hr₀ | hr₀
· trans Ordering.gt
exacts [(hr₀.trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt,
((mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg w.im_pos (sinh_neg_iff.2 hr₀)).trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt.symm]
have hr₀' : 0 ≤ w.im * Real.sinh r := by positivity
have hzw₀ : 0 < 2 * z.im * w.im := by positivity
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
we need to give Lean the hint `(y := w.im * Real.sinh r)`. -/
simp only [← cosh_strictMonoOn.cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg hr₀,
← (pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ two_ne_zero).cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg (y := w.im * Real.sinh r) hr₀',
dist_coe_center_sq]
rw [← cmp_mul_pos_left hzw₀, ← cmp_sub_zero, ← mul_sub, ← cmp_add_right, zero_add]
theorem dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) = w.im * Real.sinh r :=
eq_iff_eq_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
@[simp]
theorem dist_self_center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
dist (z : ℂ) (z.center r) = z.im * (Real.cosh r - 1) := by
rw [dist_of_re_eq (z.center_re r).symm, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, mul_sub, mul_one]
exact abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 <| le_mul_of_one_le_right z.im_pos.le (one_le_cosh _))
@[simp]
theorem dist_center_dist (z w : ℍ) :
dist (z : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) = w.im * Real.sinh (dist z w) :=
dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq.1 rfl
theorem dist_lt_iff_dist_coe_center_lt :
dist z w < r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) < w.im * Real.sinh r :=
lt_iff_lt_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
theorem lt_dist_iff_lt_dist_coe_center :
r < dist z w ↔ w.im * Real.sinh r < dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) :=
lt_iff_lt_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_eq_cmp_symm.1 <| cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
theorem dist_le_iff_dist_coe_center_le :
dist z w ≤ r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) ≤ w.im * Real.sinh r :=
le_iff_le_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
theorem le_dist_iff_le_dist_coe_center :
r < dist z w ↔ w.im * Real.sinh r < dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) :=
lt_iff_lt_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_eq_cmp_symm.1 <| cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
/-- For two points on the same vertical line, the distance is equal to the distance between the
logarithms of their imaginary parts. -/
nonrec theorem dist_of_re_eq (h : z.re = w.re) : dist z w = dist (log z.im) (log w.im) := by
have h₀ : 0 < z.im / w.im := by positivity
rw [dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq, Real.dist_eq, ← abs_sinh, ← log_div z.im_ne_zero w.im_ne_zero,
sinh_log h₀, dist_of_re_eq, coe_im, coe_im, center_im, cosh_abs, cosh_log h₀, inv_div] <;>
[skip; exact h]
nth_rw 4 [← abs_of_pos w.im_pos]
simp only [← _root_.abs_mul, coe_im, Real.dist_eq]
congr 1
field_simp
ring
/-- Hyperbolic distance between two points is greater than or equal to the distance between the
logarithms of their imaginary parts. -/
theorem dist_log_im_le (z w : ℍ) : dist (log z.im) (log w.im) ≤ dist z w :=
calc
dist (log z.im) (log w.im) = dist (mk ⟨0, z.im⟩ z.im_pos) (mk ⟨0, w.im⟩ w.im_pos) :=
Eq.symm <| dist_of_re_eq rfl
_ ≤ dist z w := by
simp_rw [dist_eq]
dsimp only [coe_mk, mk_im]
gcongr
simpa [sqrt_sq_eq_abs] using Complex.abs_im_le_norm (z - w)
theorem im_le_im_mul_exp_dist (z w : ℍ) : z.im ≤ w.im * Real.exp (dist z w) := by
rw [← div_le_iff₀' w.im_pos, ← exp_log z.im_pos, ← exp_log w.im_pos, ← Real.exp_sub, exp_le_exp]
exact (le_abs_self _).trans (dist_log_im_le z w)
theorem im_div_exp_dist_le (z w : ℍ) : z.im / Real.exp (dist z w) ≤ w.im :=
(div_le_iff₀ (exp_pos _)).2 (im_le_im_mul_exp_dist z w)
/-- An upper estimate on the complex distance between two points in terms of the hyperbolic distance
and the imaginary part of one of the points. -/
theorem dist_coe_le (z w : ℍ) : dist (z : ℂ) w ≤ w.im * (Real.exp (dist z w) - 1) :=
calc
dist (z : ℂ) w ≤ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) + dist (w : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ = w.im * (Real.exp (dist z w) - 1) := by
rw [dist_center_dist, dist_self_center, ← mul_add, ← add_sub_assoc, Real.sinh_add_cosh]
/-- An upper estimate on the complex distance between two points in terms of the hyperbolic distance
and the imaginary part of one of the points. -/
theorem le_dist_coe (z w : ℍ) : w.im * (1 - Real.exp (-dist z w)) ≤ dist (z : ℂ) w :=
calc
w.im * (1 - Real.exp (-dist z w)) =
dist (z : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) - dist (w : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) := by
rw [dist_center_dist, dist_self_center, ← Real.cosh_sub_sinh]; ring
_ ≤ dist (z : ℂ) w := sub_le_iff_le_add.2 <| dist_triangle _ _ _
/-- The hyperbolic metric on the upper half plane. We ensure that the projection to
`TopologicalSpace` is definitionally equal to the subtype topology. -/
instance : MetricSpace ℍ :=
metricSpaceAux.replaceTopology <| by
refine le_antisymm (continuous_id_iff_le.1 ?_) ?_
· refine (@continuous_iff_continuous_dist ℍ ℍ metricSpaceAux.toPseudoMetricSpace _ _).2 ?_
have : ∀ x : ℍ × ℍ, 2 * √(x.1.im * x.2.im) ≠ 0 := fun x => by positivity
| -- `continuity` fails to apply `Continuous.div`
apply_rules [Continuous.div, Continuous.mul, continuous_const, Continuous.arsinh,
Continuous.dist, continuous_coe.comp, continuous_fst, continuous_snd,
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Metric.lean | 254 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Predicate
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
/-!
# Localization of product categories
In this file, it is shown that if functors `L₁ : C₁ ⥤ D₁` and `L₂ : C₂ ⥤ D₂`
are localization functors for morphisms properties `W₁` and `W₂`, then
the product functor `C₁ × C₂ ⥤ D₁ × D₂` is a localization functor for
`W₁.prod W₂ : MorphismProperty (C₁ × C₂)`, at least if both `W₁` and `W₂`
contain identities. This main result is the instance `Functor.IsLocalization.prod`.
The proof proceeds by showing first `Localization.Construction.prodIsLocalization`,
which asserts that this holds for the localization functors `W₁.Q` and `W₂.Q` to
the constructed localized categories: this is done by showing that the product
functor `W₁.Q.prod W₂.Q : C₁ × C₂ ⥤ W₁.Localization × W₂.Localization` satisfies
the strict universal property of the localization for `W₁.prod W₂`. The general
case follows by transporting this result through equivalences of categories.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ v₅ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄ u₅
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C₁ : Type u₁} {C₂ : Type u₂} {D₁ : Type u₃} {D₂ : Type u₄}
[Category.{v₁} C₁] [Category.{v₂} C₂] [Category.{v₃} D₁] [Category.{v₄} D₂]
(L₁ : C₁ ⥤ D₁) {W₁ : MorphismProperty C₁}
(L₂ : C₂ ⥤ D₂) {W₂ : MorphismProperty C₂}
namespace Localization
namespace StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget
variable {E : Type u₅} [Category.{v₅} E] (F : C₁ × C₂ ⥤ E)
lemma prod_uniq (F₁ F₂ : (W₁.Localization × W₂.Localization ⥤ E))
(h : (W₁.Q.prod W₂.Q) ⋙ F₁ = (W₁.Q.prod W₂.Q) ⋙ F₂) :
F₁ = F₂ := by
apply Functor.curry_obj_injective
apply Construction.uniq
apply Functor.flip_injective
apply Construction.uniq
apply Functor.flip_injective
apply Functor.uncurry_obj_injective
simpa only [Functor.uncurry_obj_curry_obj_flip_flip] using h
/-- Auxiliary definition for `prodLift`. -/
noncomputable def prodLift₁ [W₂.ContainsIdentities]
(hF : (W₁.prod W₂).IsInvertedBy F) :
W₁.Localization ⥤ C₂ ⥤ E :=
Construction.lift (curry.obj F) (fun _ _ f₁ hf₁ => by
haveI : ∀ (X₂ : C₂), IsIso (((curry.obj F).map f₁).app X₂) :=
fun X₂ => hF _ ⟨hf₁, MorphismProperty.id_mem _ _⟩
apply NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app)
variable (hF : (W₁.prod W₂).IsInvertedBy F)
lemma prod_fac₁ [W₂.ContainsIdentities] :
W₁.Q ⋙ prodLift₁ F hF = curry.obj F :=
Construction.fac _ _
variable [W₁.ContainsIdentities] [W₂.ContainsIdentities]
/-- The lifting of a functor `F : C₁ × C₂ ⥤ E` inverting `W₁.prod W₂` to a functor
`W₁.Localization × W₂.Localization ⥤ E` -/
noncomputable def prodLift :
W₁.Localization × W₂.Localization ⥤ E := by
refine uncurry.obj (Construction.lift (prodLift₁ F hF).flip ?_).flip
intro _ _ f₂ hf₂
haveI : ∀ (X₁ : W₁.Localization),
IsIso (((Functor.flip (prodLift₁ F hF)).map f₂).app X₁) := fun X₁ => by
obtain ⟨X₁, rfl⟩ := (Construction.objEquiv W₁).surjective X₁
exact ((MorphismProperty.isomorphisms E).arrow_mk_iso_iff
| (((Functor.mapArrowFunctor _ _).mapIso
(eqToIso (Functor.congr_obj (prod_fac₁ F hF) X₁))).app (Arrow.mk f₂))).2
(hF _ ⟨MorphismProperty.id_mem _ _, hf₂⟩)
apply NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app
lemma prod_fac₂ :
W₂.Q ⋙ (curry.obj (prodLift F hF)).flip = (prodLift₁ F hF).flip := by
simp only [prodLift, Functor.curry_obj_uncurry_obj, Functor.flip_flip]
apply Construction.fac
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Prod.lean | 81 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.MappingCone
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplexShift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Functor
/-! The pretriangulated structure on the homotopy category of complexes
In this file, we define the pretriangulated structure on the homotopy
category `HomotopyCategory C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` of an additive category `C`.
The distinguished triangles are the triangles that are isomorphic to the
image in the homotopy category of the standard triangle
`K ⟶ L ⟶ mappingCone φ ⟶ K⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧` for some morphism of
cochain complexes `φ : K ⟶ L`.
This result first appeared in the Liquid Tensor Experiment. In the LTE, the
formalization followed the Stacks Project: in particular, the distinguished
triangles were defined using degreewise-split short exact sequences of cochain
complexes. Here, we follow the original definitions in [Verdiers's thesis, I.3][verdier1996]
(with the better sign conventions from the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000]).
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/014P
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits CochainComplex.HomComplex Pretriangulated
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
[Preadditive C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
[Preadditive D] [HasBinaryBiproducts D]
{K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : K ⟶ L)
namespace CochainComplex
namespace mappingCone
/-- The standard triangle `K ⟶ L ⟶ mappingCone φ ⟶ K⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧` in `CochainComplex C ℤ`
attached to a morphism `φ : K ⟶ L`. It involves `φ`, `inr φ : L ⟶ mappingCone φ` and
the morphism induced by the `1`-cocycle `-mappingCone.fst φ`. -/
@[simps! obj₁ obj₂ obj₃ mor₁ mor₂]
noncomputable def triangle : Triangle (CochainComplex C ℤ) :=
Triangle.mk φ (inr φ) (Cocycle.homOf ((-fst φ).rightShift 1 0 (zero_add 1)))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q hpq ≫ (triangle φ).mor₃.f q =
-(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso 1 q p (by rw [← hpq, neg_add_cancel_right])).inv := by
dsimp [triangle]
-- the following list of lemmas was obtained by doing
-- simp? [Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 (zero_add 1) q q (add_zero q) p (by omega)]
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, Cochain.rightShift_neg, Cochain.neg_v, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 (zero_add 1) q q (add_zero q) p (by omega), shiftFunctor_obj_X,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, Preadditive.comp_neg, inl_v_fst_v_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_triangle_mor₃_f (p : ℤ) : (inr φ).f p ≫ (triangle φ).mor₃.f p = 0 := by
dsimp [triangle]
-- the following list of lemmas was obtained by doing
-- simp? [Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 _ p p (add_zero p) (p+1) rfl]
simp only [Cochain.rightShift_neg, Cochain.neg_v, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 _ p p (add_zero p) (p + 1) rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id,
Preadditive.comp_neg, inr_f_fst_v, neg_zero]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_triangleδ : inr φ ≫ (triangle φ).mor₃ = 0 := by ext; dsimp; simp
/-- The (distinguished) triangle in the homotopy category that is associated to
a morphism `φ : K ⟶ L` in the category `CochainComplex C ℤ`. -/
noncomputable abbrev triangleh : Triangle (HomotopyCategory C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)) :=
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).mapTriangle.obj (triangle φ)
variable (K) in
/-- The mapping cone of the identity is contractible. -/
noncomputable def homotopyToZeroOfId : Homotopy (𝟙 (mappingCone (𝟙 K))) 0 :=
descHomotopy (𝟙 K) _ _ 0 (inl _) (by simp) (by simp)
section mapOfHomotopy
variable {K₁ L₁ K₂ L₂ K₃ L₃ : CochainComplex C ℤ} {φ₁ : K₁ ⟶ L₁} {φ₂ : K₂ ⟶ L₂}
{a : K₁ ⟶ K₂} {b : L₁ ⟶ L₂} (H : Homotopy (φ₁ ≫ b) (a ≫ φ₂))
/-- The morphism `mappingCone φ₁ ⟶ mappingCone φ₂` that is induced by a square that
is commutative up to homotopy. -/
noncomputable def mapOfHomotopy :
mappingCone φ₁ ⟶ mappingCone φ₂ :=
desc φ₁ ((Cochain.ofHom a).comp (inl φ₂) (zero_add _) +
((Cochain.equivHomotopy _ _) H).1.comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ₂)) (add_zero _))
(b ≫ inr φ₂) (by simp)
@[reassoc]
lemma triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₂ :
inr φ₁ ≫ mapOfHomotopy H = b ≫ inr φ₂ := by
simp [mapOfHomotopy]
@[reassoc]
lemma triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₃ :
mapOfHomotopy H ≫ (triangle φ₂).mor₃ = (triangle φ₁).mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' := by
ext p
dsimp [mapOfHomotopy, triangle]
-- the following list of lemmas as been obtained by doing
-- simp? [ext_from_iff _ _ _ rfl, Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 _ p p _ (p + 1) rfl]
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, Cochain.rightShift_neg, Cochain.neg_v, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
Cochain.rightShift_v _ 1 0 _ p p _ (p + 1) rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X, shiftFunctorObjXIso,
HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, Preadditive.comp_neg,
Preadditive.neg_comp, ext_from_iff _ _ _ rfl, inl_v_desc_f_assoc, Cochain.add_v,
Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v, Preadditive.add_comp,
assoc, inl_v_fst_v, inr_f_fst_v, comp_zero, add_zero, inl_v_fst_v_assoc, inr_f_desc_f_assoc,
HomologicalComplex.comp_f, neg_zero, inr_f_fst_v_assoc, zero_comp, and_self]
/-- The morphism `triangleh φ₁ ⟶ triangleh φ₂` that is induced by a square that
is commutative up to homotopy. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def trianglehMapOfHomotopy :
triangleh φ₁ ⟶ triangleh φ₂ where
hom₁ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map a
hom₂ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map b
hom₃ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map (mapOfHomotopy H)
comm₁ := by
dsimp
simp only [← Functor.map_comp]
exact HomotopyCategory.eq_of_homotopy _ _ H
comm₂ := by
dsimp
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₂]
comm₃ := by
dsimp
rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc, triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₃, Functor.map_comp, assoc, assoc]
simp
end mapOfHomotopy
section map
variable {K₁ L₁ K₂ L₂ K₃ L₃ : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ₁ : K₁ ⟶ L₁) (φ₂ : K₂ ⟶ L₂) (φ₃ : K₃ ⟶ L₃)
(a : K₁ ⟶ K₂) (b : L₁ ⟶ L₂)
/-- The morphism `mappingCone φ₁ ⟶ mappingCone φ₂` that is induced by a commutative square. -/
noncomputable def map (comm : φ₁ ≫ b = a ≫ φ₂) : mappingCone φ₁ ⟶ mappingCone φ₂ :=
desc φ₁ ((Cochain.ofHom a).comp (inl φ₂) (zero_add _)) (b ≫ inr φ₂)
(by simp [reassoc_of% comm])
variable (comm : φ₁ ≫ b = a ≫ φ₂)
lemma map_eq_mapOfHomotopy : map φ₁ φ₂ a b comm = mapOfHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq comm) := by
simp [map, mapOfHomotopy]
lemma map_id : map φ φ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by rw [id_comp, comp_id]) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext n
simp [ext_from_iff _ (n + 1) n rfl, map]
variable (a' : K₂ ⟶ K₃) (b' : L₂ ⟶ L₃)
@[reassoc]
lemma map_comp (comm' : φ₂ ≫ b' = a' ≫ φ₃) :
map φ₁ φ₃ (a ≫ a') (b ≫ b') (by rw [reassoc_of% comm, comm', assoc]) =
map φ₁ φ₂ a b comm ≫ map φ₂ φ₃ a' b' comm' := by
ext n
simp [ext_from_iff _ (n+1) n rfl, map]
/-- The morphism `triangle φ₁ ⟶ triangle φ₂` that is induced by a commutative square. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def triangleMap :
triangle φ₁ ⟶ triangle φ₂ where
hom₁ := a
hom₂ := b
hom₃ := map φ₁ φ₂ a b comm
comm₁ := comm
comm₂ := by
dsimp
rw [map_eq_mapOfHomotopy, triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₂]
comm₃ := by
dsimp
rw [map_eq_mapOfHomotopy, triangleMapOfHomotopy_comm₃]
end map
section Rotate
/-- Given `φ : K ⟶ L`, `K⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧` is homotopy equivalent to
the mapping cone of `inr φ : L ⟶ mappingCone φ`. -/
noncomputable def rotateHomotopyEquiv :
HomotopyEquiv (K⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) (mappingCone (inr φ)) where
hom := lift (inr φ) (-(Cocycle.ofHom φ).leftShift 1 1 (zero_add 1))
(-(inl φ).leftShift 1 0 (neg_add_cancel 1)) (by
-- the following list of lemmas has been obtained by doing
-- simp? [Cochain.δ_leftShift _ 1 0 1 (neg_add_cancel 1) 0 (zero_add 1)]
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, δ_neg,
Cochain.δ_leftShift _ 1 0 1 (neg_add_cancel 1) 0 (zero_add 1),
Int.negOnePow_one, δ_inl, Cochain.ofHom_comp, Cochain.leftShift_comp_zero_cochain,
Units.neg_smul, one_smul, neg_neg, Cocycle.coe_neg, Cocycle.leftShift_coe,
Cocycle.ofHom_coe, Cochain.neg_comp, add_neg_cancel])
inv := desc (inr φ) 0 (triangle φ).mor₃
(by simp only [δ_zero, inr_triangleδ, Cochain.ofHom_zero])
homotopyHomInvId := Homotopy.ofEq (by
ext n
-- the following list of lemmas has been obtained by doing
-- simp? [lift_desc_f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rfl,
-- (inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 _ _ n _ (n + 1) (by simp only [add_neg_cancel_right])]
simp only [shiftFunctor_obj_X', Int.reduceNeg, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
lift_desc_f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rfl, Cocycle.coe_neg, Cocycle.leftShift_coe,
Cocycle.ofHom_coe, Cochain.neg_v, Cochain.zero_v,
comp_zero, (inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 _ _ n _ (n + 1) (by simp only [add_neg_cancel_right]),
shiftFunctor_obj_X, mul_zero, sub_self, Int.zero_ediv, add_zero, Int.negOnePow_zero,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, id_comp, one_smul,
Preadditive.neg_comp, inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f, Iso.refl_inv, neg_neg, zero_add,
HomologicalComplex.id_f])
homotopyInvHomId := (Cochain.equivHomotopy _ _).symm
⟨-(snd (inr φ)).comp ((snd φ).comp (inl (inr φ)) (zero_add (-1))) (zero_add (-1)), by
ext n
-- the following list of lemmas has been obtained by doing
-- simp? [ext_to_iff _ _ (n + 1) rfl, ext_from_iff _ (n + 1) _ rfl,
-- δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
-- (inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) n n (add_zero n) (n + 1) (by omega),
-- (Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) n (n + 1) rfl (n + 1) (by omega),
-- Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) n (n + 1) n rfl (by omega)]
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, Cochain.ofHom_comp, ofHom_desc, ofHom_lift, Cocycle.coe_neg,
Cocycle.leftShift_coe, Cocycle.ofHom_coe, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v,
shiftFunctor_obj_X', δ_neg, δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1), δ_inl,
Int.negOnePow_neg, Int.negOnePow_one, δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, smul_neg, Units.neg_smul, one_smul,
neg_neg, Cochain.comp_add, inr_snd_assoc, neg_add_rev, Cochain.add_v, Cochain.neg_v,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) n (n + 1) n rfl (by omega),
Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f,
ext_to_iff _ _ (n + 1) rfl, assoc, liftCochain_v_fst_v,
(Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) n (n + 1) rfl (n + 1) (by omega),
shiftFunctor_obj_X, mul_one, sub_self, mul_zero, Int.zero_ediv, add_zero,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, id_comp,
Preadditive.add_comp, Preadditive.neg_comp, inl_v_fst_v, comp_id, inr_f_fst_v, comp_zero,
neg_zero, neg_add_cancel_comm, ext_from_iff _ (n + 1) _ rfl, inl_v_descCochain_v_assoc,
Cochain.zero_v, zero_comp, Preadditive.comp_neg, inl_v_snd_v_assoc,
inr_f_descCochain_v_assoc, inr_f_snd_v_assoc, inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f_assoc, triangle_obj₁,
Iso.refl_inv, inl_v_fst_v_assoc, inr_f_triangle_mor₃_f_assoc, inr_f_fst_v_assoc, and_self,
liftCochain_v_snd_v,
(inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) n n (add_zero n) (n + 1) (by omega),
Int.negOnePow_zero, inl_v_snd_v, inr_f_snd_v, zero_add, inl_v_descCochain_v,
inr_f_descCochain_v, inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f, inr_f_triangle_mor₃_f, neg_add_cancel]⟩
/-- Auxiliary definition for `rotateTrianglehIso`. -/
noncomputable def rotateHomotopyEquivComm₂Homotopy :
Homotopy ((triangle φ).mor₃ ≫ (rotateHomotopyEquiv φ).hom)
(inr (CochainComplex.mappingCone.inr φ)) := (Cochain.equivHomotopy _ _).symm
⟨-(snd φ).comp (inl (inr φ)) (zero_add (-1)), by
ext p
dsimp [rotateHomotopyEquiv]
-- the following list of lemmas has been obtained by doing
-- simp? [ext_from_iff _ _ _ rfl, ext_to_iff _ _ _ rfl,
-- (inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) p p (add_zero p) (p + 1) (by omega),
-- δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
-- Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p (p + 1) p rfl (by omega),
-- (Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) p (p + 1) rfl (p + 1) (by omega)]⟩
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, Cochain.ofHom_comp, ofHom_lift, Cocycle.coe_neg,
Cocycle.leftShift_coe, Cocycle.ofHom_coe, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v,
shiftFunctor_obj_X', Cochain.ofHom_v, δ_neg, δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_inl, Int.negOnePow_neg, Int.negOnePow_one, δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, smul_neg, Units.neg_smul, one_smul, neg_neg,
neg_add_rev, Cochain.add_v, Cochain.neg_v,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p (p + 1) p rfl (by omega),
Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, ext_from_iff _ _ _ rfl, inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f_assoc,
triangle_obj₁, shiftFunctor_obj_X, shiftFunctorObjXIso, HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl,
Iso.refl_inv, Preadditive.neg_comp, id_comp, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.comp_neg,
inl_v_fst_v_assoc, inl_v_snd_v_assoc, zero_comp, neg_zero, add_zero, ext_to_iff _ _ _ rfl,
liftCochain_v_fst_v,
(Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) p (p + 1) rfl (p + 1) (by omega), mul_one,
sub_self, mul_zero, Int.zero_ediv, Iso.refl_hom, Preadditive.add_comp, assoc, inl_v_fst_v,
comp_id, inr_f_fst_v, comp_zero, liftCochain_v_snd_v,
(inl φ).leftShift_v 1 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) p p (add_zero p) (p + 1) (by omega),
Int.negOnePow_zero, inl_v_snd_v, inr_f_snd_v, zero_add, and_self,
inr_f_triangle_mor₃_f_assoc, inr_f_fst_v_assoc, inr_f_snd_v_assoc, neg_add_cancel]⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rotateHomotopyEquiv_comm₂ :
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _ ).map (triangle φ).mor₃ ≫
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _ ).map (rotateHomotopyEquiv φ).hom =
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _ ).map (inr (inr φ)) := by
simpa only [Functor.map_comp]
using HomotopyCategory.eq_of_homotopy _ _ (rotateHomotopyEquivComm₂Homotopy φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rotateHomotopyEquiv_comm₃ :
(rotateHomotopyEquiv φ).hom ≫ (triangle (inr φ)).mor₃ = -φ⟦1⟧' := by
ext p
dsimp [rotateHomotopyEquiv]
-- the following list of lemmas has been obtained by doing
-- simp? [lift_f _ _ _ _ _ (p + 1) rfl,
-- (Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) p (p + 1) rfl (p + 1) (by omega)]
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, lift_f _ _ _ _ _ (p + 1) rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X', Cocycle.coe_neg,
Cocycle.leftShift_coe, Cocycle.ofHom_coe, Cochain.neg_v,
(Cochain.ofHom φ).leftShift_v 1 1 (zero_add 1) p (p + 1) rfl (p + 1) (by omega),
shiftFunctor_obj_X, mul_one, sub_self, mul_zero, Int.zero_ediv, add_zero, Int.negOnePow_one,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, Cochain.ofHom_v, id_comp,
Units.neg_smul, one_smul, neg_neg, Preadditive.neg_comp, Preadditive.add_comp, assoc,
inl_v_triangle_mor₃_f, Iso.refl_inv, Preadditive.comp_neg, comp_id, inr_f_triangle_mor₃_f,
comp_zero, neg_zero]
/-- The canonical isomorphism of triangles `(triangleh φ).rotate ≅ (triangleh (inr φ))`. -/
noncomputable def rotateTrianglehIso :
(triangleh φ).rotate ≅ (triangleh (inr φ)) :=
Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(((HomotopyCategory.quotient C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).commShiftIso (1 : ℤ)).symm.app K ≪≫
HomotopyCategory.isoOfHomotopyEquiv (rotateHomotopyEquiv φ))
(by dsimp; simp) (by dsimp; simp) (by
dsimp
rw [CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id, comp_id, assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
rotateHomotopyEquiv_comm₃, Functor.map_neg, Preadditive.neg_comp,
Functor.commShiftIso_hom_naturality, Preadditive.comp_neg,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc])
end Rotate
section Shift
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(mappingCone φ)⟦n⟧ ≅ mappingCone (φ⟦n⟧')`. -/
noncomputable def shiftIso (n : ℤ) : (mappingCone φ)⟦n⟧ ≅ mappingCone (φ⟦n⟧') where
hom := lift _ (n.negOnePow • (fst φ).shift n) ((snd φ).shift n) (by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [Cochain.δ_shift, δ_snd, Cochain.shift_neg, smul_neg, Cochain.neg_v,
shiftFunctor_obj_X', Cochain.units_smul_v, Cochain.shift_v', Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v,
Cochain.ofHom_v, Cochain.units_smul_comp, shiftFunctor_map_f', neg_add_cancel])
inv := desc _ (n.negOnePow • (inl φ).shift n) ((inr φ)⟦n⟧') (by
ext p
dsimp
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, δ_units_smul, Cochain.δ_shift, δ_inl, Cochain.ofHom_comp, smul_smul,
Int.units_mul_self, one_smul, Cochain.shift_v', Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v,
Cochain.ofHom_v, shiftFunctor_obj_X', shiftFunctor_map_f'])
hom_inv_id := by
ext p
dsimp
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, lift_desc_f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (p + 1) rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
Cocycle.coe_units_smul, Cocycle.shift_coe, Cochain.units_smul_v, Cochain.shift_v',
Linear.comp_units_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp, smul_smul, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul,
shiftFunctor_map_f', id_X]
inv_hom_id := by
ext p
dsimp
simp only [Int.reduceNeg, ext_from_iff _ (p + 1) _ rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
inl_v_desc_f_assoc, Cochain.units_smul_v, Cochain.shift_v', Linear.units_smul_comp, comp_id,
ext_to_iff _ _ (p + 1) rfl, assoc, lift_f_fst_v,
Cocycle.coe_units_smul, Cocycle.shift_coe, Linear.comp_units_smul, inl_v_fst_v, smul_smul,
Int.units_mul_self, one_smul, lift_f_snd_v, inl_v_snd_v, smul_zero, and_self,
inr_f_desc_f_assoc, shiftFunctor_map_f', inr_f_fst_v, inr_f_snd_v]
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(triangle φ)⟦n⟧ ≅ triangle (φ⟦n⟧')`. -/
noncomputable def shiftTriangleIso (n : ℤ) :
(Triangle.shiftFunctor _ n).obj (triangle φ) ≅ triangle (φ⟦n⟧') := by
refine Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) (n.negOnePow • Iso.refl _) (shiftIso φ n) ?_ ?_ ?_
· dsimp
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, comp_id, id_comp, smul_smul,
Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
· ext p
dsimp
simp only [Units.smul_def, shiftIso, Int.reduceNeg, Linear.smul_comp, id_comp,
ext_to_iff _ _ (p + 1) rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X', assoc, lift_f_fst_v, Cocycle.coe_smul,
Cocycle.shift_coe, Cochain.smul_v, Cochain.shift_v', Linear.comp_smul, inr_f_fst_v,
smul_zero, lift_f_snd_v, inr_f_snd_v, and_true]
· ext p
dsimp
simp only [triangle, Triangle.mk_mor₃, Cocycle.homOf_f, Cocycle.rightShift_coe,
Cocycle.coe_neg, Cochain.rightShift_neg, Cochain.neg_v, shiftFunctor_obj_X',
(fst φ).1.rightShift_v 1 0 (zero_add 1) (p + n) (p + n) (add_zero (p + n)) (p + 1 + n)
(by omega),
shiftFunctor_obj_X, shiftFunctorObjXIso, shiftFunctorComm_hom_app_f, Preadditive.neg_comp,
assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id, smul_neg, Units.smul_def, shiftIso, Int.reduceNeg,
(fst (φ⟦n⟧')).1.rightShift_v 1 0 (zero_add 1) p p (add_zero p) (p + 1) rfl,
HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_inv, Preadditive.comp_neg, lift_f_fst_v,
Cocycle.coe_smul, Cocycle.shift_coe, Cochain.smul_v, Cochain.shift_v']
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(triangleh φ)⟦n⟧ ≅ triangleh (φ⟦n⟧')`. -/
noncomputable def shiftTrianglehIso (n : ℤ) :
(Triangle.shiftFunctor _ n).obj (triangleh φ) ≅ triangleh (φ⟦n⟧') :=
((HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).mapTriangle.commShiftIso n).symm.app _ ≪≫
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).mapTriangle.mapIso (shiftTriangleIso φ n)
end Shift
section
open Preadditive
variable (G : C ⥤ D) [G.Additive]
lemma map_δ :
| (G.mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).map (triangle φ).mor₃ ≫
NatTrans.app ((Functor.mapHomologicalComplex G (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).commShiftIso 1).hom K =
(mapHomologicalComplexIso φ G).hom ≫
(triangle ((G.mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).map φ)).mor₃ := by
ext n
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/Pretriangulated.lean | 393 | 397 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.OpenCover
/-!
# Sober spaces
A quasi-sober space is a topological space where every irreducible closed subset has a generic
point.
A sober space is a quasi-sober space where every irreducible closed subset
has a *unique* generic point. This is if and only if the space is T0, and thus sober spaces can be
stated via `[QuasiSober α] [T0Space α]`.
## Main definition
* `IsGenericPoint` : `x` is the generic point of `S` if `S` is the closure of `x`.
* `QuasiSober` : A space is quasi-sober if every irreducible closed subset has a generic point.
* `genericPoints` : The set of generic points of irreducible components.
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
section genericPoint
/-- `x` is a generic point of `S` if `S` is the closure of `x`. -/
def IsGenericPoint (x : α) (S : Set α) : Prop :=
closure ({x} : Set α) = S
theorem isGenericPoint_def {x : α} {S : Set α} : IsGenericPoint x S ↔ closure ({x} : Set α) = S :=
Iff.rfl
theorem IsGenericPoint.def {x : α} {S : Set α} (h : IsGenericPoint x S) :
closure ({x} : Set α) = S :=
h
theorem isGenericPoint_closure {x : α} : IsGenericPoint x (closure ({x} : Set α)) :=
refl _
variable {x y : α} {S U Z : Set α}
theorem isGenericPoint_iff_specializes : IsGenericPoint x S ↔ ∀ y, x ⤳ y ↔ y ∈ S := by
simp only [specializes_iff_mem_closure, IsGenericPoint, Set.ext_iff]
namespace IsGenericPoint
theorem specializes_iff_mem (h : IsGenericPoint x S) : x ⤳ y ↔ y ∈ S :=
isGenericPoint_iff_specializes.1 h y
protected theorem specializes (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (h' : y ∈ S) : x ⤳ y :=
h.specializes_iff_mem.2 h'
protected theorem mem (h : IsGenericPoint x S) : x ∈ S :=
h.specializes_iff_mem.1 specializes_rfl
protected theorem isClosed (h : IsGenericPoint x S) : IsClosed S :=
h.def ▸ isClosed_closure
protected theorem isIrreducible (h : IsGenericPoint x S) : IsIrreducible S :=
h.def ▸ isIrreducible_singleton.closure
protected theorem inseparable (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (h' : IsGenericPoint y S) :
Inseparable x y :=
(h.specializes h'.mem).antisymm (h'.specializes h.mem)
/-- In a T₀ space, each set has at most one generic point. -/
protected theorem eq [T0Space α] (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (h' : IsGenericPoint y S) : x = y :=
(h.inseparable h').eq
theorem mem_open_set_iff (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (hU : IsOpen U) : x ∈ U ↔ (S ∩ U).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h' => ⟨x, h.mem, h'⟩, fun ⟨_y, hyS, hyU⟩ => (h.specializes hyS).mem_open hU hyU⟩
theorem disjoint_iff (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (hU : IsOpen U) : Disjoint S U ↔ x ∉ U := by
rw [h.mem_open_set_iff hU, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.not_not]
theorem mem_closed_set_iff (h : IsGenericPoint x S) (hZ : IsClosed Z) : x ∈ Z ↔ S ⊆ Z := by
rw [← h.def, hZ.closure_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
protected theorem image (h : IsGenericPoint x S) {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsGenericPoint (f x) (closure (f '' S)) := by
rw [isGenericPoint_def, ← h.def, ← image_singleton, closure_image_closure hf]
end IsGenericPoint
theorem isGenericPoint_iff_forall_closed (hS : IsClosed S) (hxS : x ∈ S) :
IsGenericPoint x S ↔ ∀ Z : Set α, IsClosed Z → x ∈ Z → S ⊆ Z := by
have : closure {x} ⊆ S := closure_minimal (singleton_subset_iff.2 hxS) hS
simp_rw [IsGenericPoint, subset_antisymm_iff, this, true_and, closure, subset_sInter_iff,
mem_setOf_eq, and_imp, singleton_subset_iff]
end genericPoint
section Sober
/-- A space is sober if every irreducible closed subset has a generic point. -/
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSober (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
sober : ∀ {S : Set α}, IsIrreducible S → IsClosed S → ∃ x, IsGenericPoint x S
/-- A generic point of the closure of an irreducible space. -/
noncomputable def IsIrreducible.genericPoint [QuasiSober α] {S : Set α} (hS : IsIrreducible S) :
α :=
(QuasiSober.sober hS.closure isClosed_closure).choose
theorem IsIrreducible.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure
[QuasiSober α] {S : Set α} (hS : IsIrreducible S) :
IsGenericPoint hS.genericPoint (closure S) :=
(QuasiSober.sober hS.closure isClosed_closure).choose_spec
theorem IsIrreducible.isGenericPoint_genericPoint [QuasiSober α] {S : Set α}
(hS : IsIrreducible S) (hS' : IsClosed S) :
IsGenericPoint hS.genericPoint S := by
convert hS.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure; exact hS'.closure_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem IsIrreducible.genericPoint_closure_eq [QuasiSober α] {S : Set α} (hS : IsIrreducible S) :
closure ({hS.genericPoint} : Set α) = closure S :=
hS.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure
theorem IsIrreducible.closure_genericPoint [QuasiSober α] {S : Set α}
(hS : IsIrreducible S) (hS' : IsClosed S) :
closure ({hS.genericPoint} : Set α) = S :=
hS.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure.trans hS'.closure_eq
variable (α)
/-- A generic point of a sober irreducible space. -/
noncomputable def genericPoint [QuasiSober α] [IrreducibleSpace α] : α :=
(IrreducibleSpace.isIrreducible_univ α).genericPoint
theorem genericPoint_spec [QuasiSober α] [IrreducibleSpace α] :
IsGenericPoint (genericPoint α) univ := by
simpa using (IrreducibleSpace.isIrreducible_univ α).isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure
@[simp]
theorem genericPoint_closure [QuasiSober α] [IrreducibleSpace α] :
closure ({genericPoint α} : Set α) = univ :=
genericPoint_spec α
variable {α}
theorem genericPoint_specializes [QuasiSober α] [IrreducibleSpace α] (x : α) : genericPoint α ⤳ x :=
(IsIrreducible.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure _).specializes (by simp)
attribute [local instance] specializationOrder
/-- The closed irreducible subsets of a sober space bijects with the points of the space. -/
noncomputable def irreducibleSetEquivPoints [QuasiSober α] [T0Space α] :
TopologicalSpace.IrreducibleCloseds α ≃o α where
toFun s := s.2.genericPoint
invFun x := ⟨closure ({x} : Set α), isIrreducible_singleton.closure, isClosed_closure⟩
left_inv s := by
refine TopologicalSpace.IrreducibleCloseds.ext ?_
simp only [IsIrreducible.genericPoint_closure_eq, TopologicalSpace.IrreducibleCloseds.coe_mk,
closure_eq_iff_isClosed.mpr s.3]
rfl
right_inv x := isIrreducible_singleton.closure.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure.eq
(by rw [closure_closure]; exact isGenericPoint_closure)
map_rel_iff' := by
rintro ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩ ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩
refine specializes_iff_closure_subset.trans ?_
simp [hs'.closure_eq, ht'.closure_eq]
rfl
lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.quasiSober {f : α → β} (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) [QuasiSober β] :
QuasiSober α where
sober hS hS' := by
have hS'' := hS.image f hf.continuous.continuousOn
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := QuasiSober.sober hS'' (hf.isClosedMap _ hS')
obtain ⟨y, -, rfl⟩ := hx.mem
use y
apply image_injective.mpr hf.injective
rw [← hx.def, ← hf.closure_image_eq, image_singleton]
theorem Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.quasiSober {f : α → β} (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) [QuasiSober β] :
QuasiSober α where
sober hS hS' := by
have hS'' := hS.image f hf.continuous.continuousOn
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := QuasiSober.sober hS''.closure isClosed_closure
obtain ⟨T, hT, rfl⟩ := hf.isInducing.isClosed_iff.mp hS'
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range] at hx hS''
have hxT : x ∈ T := by
rw [← hT.closure_eq]
exact closure_mono inter_subset_left hx.mem
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ : x ∈ range f := by
rw [hx.mem_open_set_iff hf.isOpen_range]
refine Nonempty.mono ?_ hS''.1
simpa using subset_closure
use y
change _ = _
rw [hf.isEmbedding.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, image_singleton, show _ = _ from hx]
apply image_injective.mpr hf.injective
ext z
simp only [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, mem_inter_iff, and_congr_left_iff]
exact fun hy => ⟨fun h => hT.closure_eq ▸ closure_mono inter_subset_left h,
fun h => subset_closure ⟨h, hy⟩⟩
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover.quasiSober_iff_forall {ι : Type*} {U : ι → Opens α}
(hU : TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover U) : QuasiSober α ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSober (U i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (U i).isOpenEmbedding'.quasiSober, fun hU' ↦ (quasiSober_iff _).mpr ?_⟩
· rintro t ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h⟩ h'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hU.exists_mem x
have H : IsIrreducible ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set (U i)) :=
⟨⟨⟨x, hi⟩, hx⟩, h.preimage (U i).isOpenEmbedding'⟩
use H.genericPoint
apply le_antisymm
· simpa [h'.closure_subset_iff, h'.closure_eq] using
continuous_subtype_val.closure_preimage_subset _ H.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure.mem
rw [← image_singleton, ← closure_image_closure continuous_subtype_val,
H.isGenericPoint_genericPoint_closure.def]
| refine (subset_closure_inter_of_isPreirreducible_of_isOpen h (U i).isOpen ⟨x, ⟨hx, hi⟩⟩).trans
(closure_mono ?_)
simpa only [inter_comm t, ← Subtype.image_preimage_coe] using Set.image_subset _ subset_closure
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover.quasiSober {ι : Type*} {U : ι → Opens α}
(hU : TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover U) [∀ i, QuasiSober (U i)] : QuasiSober α :=
hU.quasiSober_iff_forall.mpr ‹_›
/-- A space is quasi-sober if it can be covered by open quasi-sober subsets. -/
theorem quasiSober_of_open_cover (S : Set (Set α)) (hS : ∀ s : S, IsOpen (s : Set α))
[∀ s : S, QuasiSober s] (hS' : ⋃₀ S = ⊤) : QuasiSober α :=
TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover.quasiSober (U := fun s : S ↦ ⟨s, hS s⟩) <| by
simpa [TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover, ← SetLike.coe_set_eq, sUnion_eq_iUnion] using hS'
/-- Any Hausdorff space is a quasi-sober space because any irreducible set is a singleton. -/
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.quasiSober [T2Space α] : QuasiSober α where
sober h _ := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := isIrreducible_iff_singleton.mp h
exact ⟨x, closure_singleton⟩
end Sober
section genericPoints
| Mathlib/Topology/Sober.lean | 218 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Quaternions
In this file we define quaternions `ℍ[R]` over a commutative ring `R`, and define some
algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`.
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra R a b c`, `ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
[Bourbaki, *Algebra I*][bourbaki1989] with coefficients `a`, `b`, `c`
(Many other references such as Wikipedia assume $\operatorname{char} R ≠ 2$ therefore one can
complete the square and WLOG assume $b = 0$.)
* `Quaternion R`, `ℍ[R]` : the space of quaternions, a.k.a.
`QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)`;
* `Quaternion.normSq` : square of the norm of a quaternion;
We also define the following algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`:
* `Ring ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, `StarRing ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
for any commutative ring `R`;
* `Ring ℍ[R]`, `StarRing ℍ[R]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R]` : for any commutative ring `R`;
* `IsDomain ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered commutative ring `R`;
* `DivisionRing ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered field `R`.
## Notation
The following notation is available with `open Quaternion` or `open scoped Quaternion`.
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ c₂ c₃`
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ 0 c₂`
* `ℍ[R]` : quaternions over `R`.
## Implementation notes
We define quaternions over any ring `R`, not just `ℝ` to be able to deal with, e.g., integer
or rational quaternions without using real numbers. In particular, all definitions in this file
are computable.
## Tags
quaternion
-/
/-- Quaternion algebra over a type with fixed coefficients where $i^2 = a + bi$ and $j^2 = c$,
denoted as `ℍ[R,a,b]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `imI`, `imJ`, and `imK`. -/
@[ext]
structure QuaternionAlgebra (R : Type*) (a b c : R) where
/-- Real part of a quaternion. -/
re : R
/-- First imaginary part (i) of a quaternion. -/
imI : R
/-- Second imaginary part (j) of a quaternion. -/
imJ : R
/-- Third imaginary part (k) of a quaternion. -/
imK : R
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "," c "]" =>
QuaternionAlgebra R a b c
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "]" => QuaternionAlgebra R a 0 b
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps]
def equivProd {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ R × R × R × R where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2.1, a.2.2.1, a.2.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def equivTuple {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) where
toFun a := ![a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4]
invFun a := ⟨a 0, a 1, a 2, a 3⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext ⟨_, _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivTuple_apply {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk.eta {R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃} (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : mk a.1 a.2 a.3 a.4 = a := rfl
variable {S T R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R} (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).subsingleton
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).surjective.nontrivial
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion.
Note that unless `c₂ = 0`, this definition is not particularly well-behaved;
for instance, `QuaternionAlgebra.star_im` only says that the star of an imaginary quaternion
is imaginary under this condition. -/
def im (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨0, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK⟩
@[simp]
theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im :=
rfl
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`. -/
@[coe] def coe (x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨x, 0, 0, 0⟩
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨coe⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := fun _ _ h => congr_arg re h
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually.
-- Should adjust `simps` to name properly, i.e. as `zero_re` rather than `instZero_zero_re`.
instance : Zero ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 0 := rfl
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨0⟩
section One
variable [One R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : One ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨1, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 1 := rfl
end One
end Zero
section Add
variable [Add R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Add ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2, a.3 + b.3, a.4 + b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_add_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) + mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ + b₁) (a₂ + b₂) (a₃ + b₃) (a₄ + b₄) :=
rfl
end Add
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass R]
@[simp] theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (zero_add _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x + y := by ext <;> simp
end AddZeroClass
section Neg
variable [Neg R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Neg ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨fun a => ⟨-a.1, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : -(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨-a₁, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ :=
rfl
end Neg
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup R]
@[simp] theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = -x := by ext <;> simp
instance : Sub ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 - b.1, a.2 - b.2, a.3 - b.3, a.4 - b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sub_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) - mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ - b₁) (a₂ - b₂) (a₃ - b₃) (a₄ - b₄) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (add_zero _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_re : a - a.re = a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_self _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _)
end AddGroup
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Multiplication is given by
* `1 * x = x * 1 = x`;
* `i * i = c₁ + c₂ * i`;
* `j * j = c₃`;
* `i * j = k`, `j * i = c₂ * j - k`;
* `k * k = - c₁ * c₃`;
* `i * k = c₁ * j + c₂ * k`, `k * i = -c₁ * j`;
* `j * k = c₂ * c₃ - c₃ * i`, `k * j = c₃ * i`. -/
instance : Mul ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b =>
⟨a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 + c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4,
a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 + c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3,
a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 + c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2,
a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 + c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 +
c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) * mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk
(a₁ * b₁ + c₁ * a₂ * b₂ + c₃ * a₃ * b₃ + c₂ * c₃ * a₃ * b₄ - c₁ * c₃ * a₄ * b₄)
(a₁ * b₂ + a₂ * b₁ + c₂ * a₂ * b₂ - c₃ * a₃ * b₄ + c₃ * a₄ * b₃)
(a₁ * b₃ + c₁ * a₂ * b₄ + a₃ * b₁ + c₂ * a₃ * b₂ - c₁ * a₄ * b₂)
(a₁ * b₄ + a₂ * b₃ + c₂ * a₂ * b₄ - a₃ * b₂ + a₄ * b₁) :=
rfl
end Ring
section SMul
variable [SMul S R] [SMul T R] (s : S)
instance : SMul S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where smul s a := ⟨s • a.1, s • a.2, s • a.3, s • a.4⟩
instance [SMul S T] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_assoc s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_assoc _ _ _
instance [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_comm s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp] theorem smul_re : (s • a).re = s • a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_im {S} [CommRing R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (smul_zero s).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk (re im_i im_j im_k : R) :
s • (⟨re, im_i, im_j, im_k⟩ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨s • re, s • im_i, s • im_j, s • im_k⟩ :=
rfl
end SMul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Zero R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) :
(↑(s • r) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = s • (r : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext rfl (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
(equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃).injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R]
instance : AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
natCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := by simp
intCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
intCast_ofNat _ := congr_arg coe (Int.cast_natCast _)
intCast_negSucc n := by
change coe _ = -coe _
rw [Int.cast_negSucc, coe_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = z :=
rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imI (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imJ (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imK (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
-- For the remainder of the file we assume `CommRing R`.
variable [CommRing R]
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
zero_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_zero _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
one_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_one _ := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x * y := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
lemma coe_ofNat {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]:
((ofNat(n) : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := by
rfl
-- TODO: add weaker `MulAction`, `DistribMulAction`, and `Module` instances (and repeat them
-- for `ℍ[R]`)
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap :=
{ toFun s := coe (algebraMap S R s)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, coe_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, coe_zero]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [map_mul, coe_mul]
map_add' x y := by simp only [map_add, coe_add] }
smul_def' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.commutes]
theorem algebraMap_eq (r : R) : algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] r = ⟨r, 0, 0, 0⟩ :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] : _ → _).Injective :=
fun _ _ ↦ by simp [algebraMap_eq]
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨by
rintro t ⟨a, b, c, d⟩ h
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro ht
simpa [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, ht] using h⟩
section
variable (c₁ c₂ c₃)
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.re` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def reₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := re
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imI` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imIₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imI
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imJ` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imJₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imJ
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imK` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imKₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imK
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple` as a linear equivalence. -/
def linearEquivTuple : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₗ[R] Fin 4 → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm -- proofs are not `rfl` in the forward direction
{ (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm with
toFun := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm
invFun := equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃) = equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple_symm :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm = (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm := rfl
/-- `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` has a basis over `R` given by `1`, `i`, `j`, and `k`. -/
noncomputable def basisOneIJK : Basis (Fin 4) R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
.ofEquivFun <| linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisOneIJK_repr (q : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
((basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃).repr q) = ![q.re, q.imI, q.imJ, q.imK] :=
rfl
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [rank_eq_card_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃), Fintype.card_fin]
norm_num
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [Module.finrank, rank_eq_four, Cardinal.toNat_ofNat]
/-- There is a natural equivalence when swapping the first and third coefficients of a
quaternion algebra if `c₂` is 0. -/
@[simps]
def swapEquiv : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₃,0,c₁] where
toFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
map_mul' _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
map_add' _ _ := by ext <;> simp [add_comm]
commutes' _ := by simp [algebraMap_eq]
end
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x - y :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_sub x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) ^ n :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_pow x n
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
Algebra.commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
(Algebra.smul_def r a).symm
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a := by rw [← coe_commutes, coe_mul_eq_smul]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ↑(x * y) := by rw [coe_mul, coe_mul_eq_smul]
/-- Quaternion conjugate. -/
instance instStarQuaternionAlgebra : Star ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where star a :=
⟨a.1 + c₂ * a.2, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩
@[simp] theorem re_star : (star a).re = a.re + c₂ * a.imI := rfl
@[simp]
theorem imI_star : (star a).imI = -a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imJ_star : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imK_star : (star a).imK = -a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_star : (star a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : star (mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) =
⟨a₁ + c₂ * a₂, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ := rfl
instance instStarRing : StarRing ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
star_involutive x := by simp [Star.star]
star_add a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm] ; ring
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by ext <;> simp [two_mul]; ring
theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by simp [self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star]
theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) - a :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 a.star_add_self'
lemma comm (r : R) (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]) : r * x = x * r := by
ext <;> simp [mul_comm]
instance : IsStarNormal a :=
⟨by
rw [commute_iff_eq, a.star_eq_two_re_sub];
ext <;> simp <;> ring⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x := by ext <;> simp
@[simp] theorem star_im : star a.im = -a.im + c₂ * a.imI := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [SMulCommClass S R R]
(s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
(by simp [mul_smul_comm]) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
/-- A version of `star_smul` for the special case when `c₂ = 0`, without `SMulCommClass S R R`. -/
theorem star_smul' [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (by simp) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re := by rw [h, coe_re]
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} :
a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨a.re, h.symm⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => eq_re_of_eq_coe h.symm⟩
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {c₁ c₂ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re := by
simp_all [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero]
theorem star_eq_neg {c₁ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
end CharZero
-- Can't use `rw ← star_eq_self` in the proof without additional assumptions
theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re := by
rw [← star_comm_self']
exact a.star_mul_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ starAddEquiv.trans opAddEquiv with
toFun := op ∘ star
invFun := star ∘ unop
map_mul' := fun x y => by simp
commutes' := fun r => by simp }
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] _) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
end QuaternionAlgebra
/-- Space of quaternions over a type, denoted as `ℍ[R]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `im_i`, `im_j`, and `im_k`. -/
def Quaternion (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] :=
QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "]" => Quaternion R
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps!]
def Quaternion.equivProd (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ R × R × R × R :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd _ _ _
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def Quaternion.equivTuple (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem Quaternion.equivTuple_apply (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] (x : ℍ[R]) :
Quaternion.equivTuple R x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Subsingleton <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
namespace Quaternion
variable {S T R : Type*} [CommRing R] (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R])
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R]`. -/
@[coe] def coe : R → ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.coe
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R] := ⟨coe⟩
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instRing
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S R] : SMul S ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| SMul S ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S T] [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
protected instance algebra [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra S ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Star ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarQuaternionAlgebra
instance : StarRing ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarRing
instance : IsStarNormal a := inferInstanceAs <| IsStarNormal (R := ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]) a
@[ext]
theorem ext : a.re = b.re → a.imI = b.imI → a.imJ = b.imJ → a.imK = b.imK → a = b :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion. -/
nonrec def im (x : ℍ[R]) : ℍ[R] := x.im
@[simp] theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a := a.re_add_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re := a.sub_self_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_re : a - ↑a.re = a.im := a.sub_self_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im := a.add_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x + y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_add x y
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im := a.neg_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R]) = -x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_neg x
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im := a.sub_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x - y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_sub x y
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.re * b.re - a.imI * b.imI - a.imJ * b.imJ - a.imK * b.imK :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_re a b).trans <| by simp [one_mul, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.re * b.imI + a.imI * b.re + a.imJ * b.imK - a.imK * b.imJ :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imI a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.re * b.imJ - a.imI * b.imK + a.imJ * b.re + a.imK * b.imI :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imJ a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.re * b.imK + a.imI * b.imJ - a.imJ * b.imI + a.imK * b.re :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imK a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x * y := QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ n :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_pow x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).re = z := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R]) := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem smul_re [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).re = s • a.re :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
nonrec theorem smul_im [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
a.smul_im s
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : (↑(s • r) : ℍ[R]) = s • (r : ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_smul _ _
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commute r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul_eq_smul r a
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.mul_coe_eq_smul r a
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_def : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R] : _ → _).Injective :=
QuaternionAlgebra.algebraMap_injective
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R]) = ↑(x * y) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.smul_coe x y
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Finite R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Free R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.rank_eq_four _ _ _
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.finrank_eq_four _ _ _
@[simp] theorem star_re : (star a).re = a.re := by
rw [QuaternionAlgebra.re_star, zero_mul, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem star_imI : (star a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imJ : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imK : (star a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_im : (star a).im = -a.im := a.im_star
nonrec theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.self_add_star', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.self_add_star, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.star_add_self', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.star_add_self, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re) - a := by
simp [a.star_eq_two_re_sub, Quaternion.coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R]) = x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_coe x
@[simp]
theorem im_star : star a.im = -a.im := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a := QuaternionAlgebra.star_smul' s a
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_of_eq_coe h
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R]} : a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_neg {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_neg
end CharZero
nonrec theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re :=
a.star_mul_eq_coe
nonrec theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re :=
a.mul_star_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
QuaternionAlgebra.starAe
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
/-- Square of the norm. -/
def normSq : ℍ[R] →*₀ R where
toFun a := (a * star a).re
map_zero' := by simp only [star_zero, zero_mul, zero_re]
map_one' := by simp only [star_one, one_mul, one_re]
map_mul' x y := coe_injective <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_star_eq_coe, star_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc y, y.mul_star_eq_coe,
coe_commutes, ← mul_assoc, x.mul_star_eq_coe, ← coe_mul]
theorem normSq_def : normSq a = (a * star a).re := rfl
theorem normSq_def' : normSq a = a.1 ^ 2 + a.2 ^ 2 + a.3 ^ 2 + a.4 ^ 2 := by
simp only [normSq_def, sq, mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, mul_re, star_re, star_imI, star_imJ,
star_imK]
theorem normSq_coe : normSq (x : ℍ[R]) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [normSq_def, star_coe, ← coe_mul, coe_re, sq]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_star : normSq (star a) = normSq a := by simp [normSq_def']
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_natCast (n : ℕ) : normSq (n : ℍ[R]) = (n : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_natCast, normSq_coe]
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_intCast (z : ℤ) : normSq (z : ℍ[R]) = (z : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_intCast, normSq_coe]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_neg : normSq (-a) = normSq a := by simp only [normSq_def, star_neg, neg_mul_neg]
theorem self_mul_star : a * star a = normSq a := by rw [mul_star_eq_coe, normSq_def]
theorem star_mul_self : star a * a = normSq a := by rw [star_comm_self, self_mul_star]
theorem im_sq : a.im ^ 2 = -normSq a.im := by
simp_rw [sq, ← star_mul_self, im_star, neg_mul, neg_neg]
theorem coe_normSq_add : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + a * star b + b * star a + normSq b := by
simp only [star_add, ← self_mul_star, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem normSq_smul (r : R) (q : ℍ[R]) : normSq (r • q) = r ^ 2 * normSq q := by
simp only [normSq_def', smul_re, smul_imI, smul_imJ, smul_imK, mul_pow, mul_add, smul_eq_mul]
theorem normSq_add (a b : ℍ[R]) : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re :=
calc
normSq (a + b) = normSq a + (a * star b).re + ((b * star a).re + normSq b) := by
simp_rw [normSq_def, star_add, add_mul, mul_add, add_re]
_ = normSq a + normSq b + ((a * star b).re + (b * star a).re) := by abel
_ = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re := by
rw [← add_re, ← star_mul_star a b, self_add_star', coe_re]
end Quaternion
namespace Quaternion
variable {R : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a : ℍ[R]}
@[simp]
theorem normSq_eq_zero : normSq a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ normSq.map_zero⟩
rw [normSq_def', add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg]
at h
· exact ext a 0 (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.1) (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.2)
all_goals apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
theorem normSq_ne_zero : normSq a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := normSq_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem normSq_nonneg : 0 ≤ normSq a := by
rw [normSq_def']
apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_le_zero : normSq a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
normSq_nonneg.le_iff_eq.trans normSq_eq_zero
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℍ[R] where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, mt (congr_arg QuaternionAlgebra.re) zero_ne_one⟩
instance : NoZeroDivisors ℍ[R] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab :=
have : normSq a * normSq b = 0 := by rwa [← map_mul, normSq_eq_zero]
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).imp normSq_eq_zero.1 normSq_eq_zero.1
instance : IsDomain ℍ[R] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
theorem sq_eq_normSq : a ^ 2 = normSq a ↔ a = a.re := by
rw [← star_eq_self, ← star_mul_self, sq, mul_eq_mul_right_iff, eq_comm]
exact or_iff_left_of_imp fun ha ↦ ha.symm ▸ star_zero _
theorem sq_eq_neg_normSq : a ^ 2 = -normSq a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp_rw [← star_eq_neg]
obtain rfl | hq0 := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp
· rw [← star_mul_self, ← mul_neg, ← neg_sq, sq, mul_left_inj' (neg_ne_zero.mpr hq0), eq_comm]
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section Field
variable [Field R] (a b : ℍ[R])
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℍ[R] where nnratCast q := (q : R)
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℍ[R] where ratCast q := (q : R)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma re_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma im_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imI_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imJ_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imK_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imI (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imJ (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imK (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
variable [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (a b : ℍ[R])
@[simps -isSimp]
instance instInv : Inv ℍ[R] :=
⟨fun a => (normSq a)⁻¹ • star a⟩
instance instGroupWithZero : GroupWithZero ℍ[R] :=
{ Quaternion.instNontrivial with
inv := Inv.inv
inv_zero := by rw [instInv_inv, star_zero, smul_zero]
mul_inv_cancel := fun a ha => by
rw [instInv_inv, Algebra.mul_smul_comm (normSq a)⁻¹ a (star a), self_mul_star, smul_coe,
inv_mul_cancel₀ (normSq_ne_zero.2 ha), coe_one] }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_inv (x : R) : ((x⁻¹ : R) : ℍ[R]) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) _
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_div (x y : R) : ((x / y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x / y :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_zpow (x : R) (z : ℤ) : ((x ^ z : R) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x z
instance instDivisionRing : DivisionRing ℍ[R] where
__ := Quaternion.instRing
__ := Quaternion.instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_natCast, coe_natCast]
ratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_intCast, coe_natCast]
nnqsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact NNRat.smul_def ..
qsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact Rat.smul_def ..
theorem normSq_inv : normSq a⁻¹ = (normSq a)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq _
theorem normSq_div : normSq (a / b) = normSq a / normSq b :=
map_div₀ normSq a b
theorem normSq_zpow (z : ℤ) : normSq (a ^ z) = normSq a ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ normSq a z
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_ratCast (q : ℚ) : normSq (q : ℍ[R]) = (q : ℍ[R]) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_ratCast, normSq_coe, coe_pow]
end Field
end Quaternion
namespace Cardinal
open Quaternion
section QuaternionAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R)
private theorem pow_four [Infinite R] : #R ^ 4 = #R :=
power_nat_eq (aleph0_le_mk R) <| by decide
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a type. -/
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_congr (QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃)]
simp only [mk_prod, lift_id]
ring
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by
rw [mk_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_univ, mk_quaternionAlgebra]
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] :
#(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by rw [mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- Show the quaternion ⟨w, x, y, z⟩ as a string "{ re := w, imI := x, imJ := y, imK := z }".
For the typical case of quaternions over ℝ, each component will show as a Cauchy sequence due to
the way Real numbers are represented.
-/
instance [Repr R] {a b c : R} : Repr ℍ[R, a, b, c] where
reprPrec q _ :=
s!"\{ re := {repr q.re}, imI := {repr q.imI}, imJ := {repr q.imJ}, imK := {repr q.imK} }"
end QuaternionAlgebra
section Quaternion
variable (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R]
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a type. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternion : #(ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
theorem mk_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R]) = #R :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite _ _ _
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternion : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
theorem mk_univ_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R :=
mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite _ _ _
end Quaternion
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quaternion.lean | 1,337 | 1,337 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.List
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Enum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
/-!
# Fixed points of normal functions
We prove various statements about the fixed points of normal ordinal functions. We state them in
three forms: as statements about type-indexed families of normal functions, as statements about
ordinal-indexed families of normal functions, and as statements about a single normal function. For
the most part, the first case encompasses the others.
Moreover, we prove some lemmas about the fixed points of specific normal functions.
## Main definitions and results
* `nfpFamily`, `nfp`: the next fixed point of a (family of) normal function(s).
* `not_bddAbove_fp_family`, `not_bddAbove_fp`: the (common) fixed points of a (family of) normal
function(s) are unbounded in the ordinals.
* `deriv_add_eq_mul_omega0_add`: a characterization of the derivative of addition.
* `deriv_mul_eq_opow_omega0_mul`: a characterization of the derivative of multiplication.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Function Order
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Fixed points of type-indexed families of ordinals -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}}
/-- The next common fixed point, at least `a`, for a family of normal functions.
This is defined for any family of functions, as the supremum of all values reachable by applying
finitely many functions in the family to `a`.
`Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp` shows this is a fixed point, `Ordinal.le_nfpFamily` shows it's at
least `a`, and `Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp` shows this is the least ordinal with these properties. -/
def nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal :=
⨆ i, List.foldr f a i
theorem foldr_le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a l) :
List.foldr f a l ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
Ordinal.le_iSup _ _
theorem le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a) : a ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
foldr_le_nfpFamily f a []
theorem lt_nfpFamily_iff [Small.{u} ι] {a b} : a < nfpFamily f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr f b l :=
Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")]
alias lt_nfpFamily := lt_nfpFamily_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le_iff [Small.{u} ι] {a b} : nfpFamily f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b :=
Ordinal.iSup_le_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le {a b} : (∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b) → nfpFamily f a ≤ b :=
Ordinal.iSup_le
theorem nfpFamily_monotone [Small.{u} ι] (hf : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) : Monotone (nfpFamily f) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ nfpFamily_le <| fun l ↦ (List.foldr_monotone hf l h).trans (foldr_le_nfpFamily _ _ l)
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b}
(hb : b < nfpFamily f a) (i) : f i b < nfpFamily f a :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily_iff.1 hb
lt_nfpFamily_iff.2 ⟨i::l, (H i).strictMono hl⟩
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff [Nonempty ι] [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b < nfpFamily f a) ↔ b < nfpFamily f a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, apply_lt_nfpFamily H⟩
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily_iff.1 (h (Classical.arbitrary ι))
exact lt_nfpFamily_iff.2 <| ⟨l, (H _).le_apply.trans_lt hl⟩
theorem nfpFamily_le_apply [Nonempty ι] [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∃ i, nfpFamily f a ≤ f i b) ↔ nfpFamily f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff H
theorem nfpFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ i, f i b ≤ b) :
nfpFamily f a ≤ b := by
apply Ordinal.iSup_le
intro l
induction' l with i l IH generalizing a
· exact ab
· exact (H i (IH ab)).trans (h i)
theorem nfpFamily_fp [Small.{u} ι] {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (a) :
f i (nfpFamily f a) = nfpFamily f a := by
rw [nfpFamily, H.map_iSup]
apply le_antisymm <;> refine Ordinal.iSup_le fun l => ?_
· exact Ordinal.le_iSup _ (i::l)
· exact H.le_apply.trans (Ordinal.le_iSup _ _)
theorem apply_le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] [hι : Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b ≤ nfpFamily f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpFamily f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := hι
exact (H i).le_apply.trans (h i)
· rw [← nfpFamily_fp (H i)]
exact (H i).monotone h
theorem nfpFamily_eq_self [Small.{u} ι] {a} (h : ∀ i, f i a = a) : nfpFamily f a = a := by
apply (Ordinal.iSup_le ?_).antisymm (le_nfpFamily f a)
intro l
rw [List.foldr_fixed' h l]
-- Todo: This is actually a special case of the fact the intersection of club sets is a club set.
/-- A generalization of the fixed point lemma for normal functions: any family of normal functions
has an unbounded set of common fixed points. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_fp_family [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
¬ BddAbove (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [not_bddAbove_iff]
refine fun a ↦ ⟨nfpFamily f (succ a), ?_, (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_nfpFamily f _)⟩
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact nfpFamily_fp (H i) _
/-- The derivative of a family of normal functions is the sequence of their common fixed points.
This is defined for all functions such that `Ordinal.derivFamily_zero`,
`Ordinal.derivFamily_succ`, and `Ordinal.derivFamily_limit` are satisfied. -/
def derivFamily (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
limitRecOn o (nfpFamily f 0) (fun _ IH => nfpFamily f (succ IH))
fun a _ g => ⨆ b : Set.Iio a, g _ b.2
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_zero (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivFamily f 0 = nfpFamily f 0 :=
limitRecOn_zero ..
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_succ (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o) :
derivFamily f (succ o) = nfpFamily f (succ (derivFamily f o)) :=
limitRecOn_succ ..
theorem derivFamily_limit (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) {o} :
IsLimit o → derivFamily f o = ⨆ b : Set.Iio o, derivFamily f b :=
limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _
theorem isNormal_derivFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
IsNormal (derivFamily f) := by
refine ⟨fun o ↦ ?_, fun o h a ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [derivFamily_succ, ← succ_le_iff]
exact le_nfpFamily _ _
· simp_rw [derivFamily_limit _ h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall, Set.mem_Iio]
theorem derivFamily_strictMono [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
StrictMono (derivFamily f) :=
(isNormal_derivFamily f).strictMono
theorem derivFamily_fp [Small.{u} ι] {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (o : Ordinal) :
f i (derivFamily f o) = derivFamily f o := by
induction' o using limitRecOn with o _ o l IH
· rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_fp H 0
· rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_fp H _
· have : Nonempty (Set.Iio o) := ⟨0, l.pos⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, H.map_iSup]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
refine forall_congr' fun a ↦ ?_
rw [IH _ a.2]
| theorem le_iff_derivFamily [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily f o = a :=
⟨fun ha => by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPoint.lean | 178 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Homogeneous.Ideal
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Projective spectrum of a graded ring
The projective spectrum of a graded commutative ring is the subtype of all homogeneous ideals that
are prime and do not contain the irrelevant ideal.
It is naturally endowed with a topology: the Zariski topology.
## Notation
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
## Main definitions
* `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜`: The projective spectrum of a graded ring `A`, or equivalently, the set of
all homogeneous ideals of `A` that is both prime and relevant i.e. not containing irrelevant
ideal. Henceforth, we call elements of projective spectrum *relevant homogeneous prime ideals*.
* `ProjectiveSpectrum.zeroLocus 𝒜 s`: The zero locus of a subset `s` of `A`
is the subset of `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜` consisting of all relevant homogeneous prime ideals that
contain `s`.
* `ProjectiveSpectrum.vanishingIdeal t`: The vanishing ideal of a subset `t` of
`ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜` is the intersection of points in `t` (viewed as relevant homogeneous prime
ideals).
* `ProjectiveSpectrum.Top`: the topological space of `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜` endowed with the
Zariski topology.
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum Pointwise SetLike TopCat TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
variable {R A : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
/-- The projective spectrum of a graded commutative ring is the subtype of all homogeneous ideals
that are prime and do not contain the irrelevant ideal. -/
@[ext]
structure ProjectiveSpectrum where
asHomogeneousIdeal : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜
isPrime : asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.IsPrime
not_irrelevant_le : ¬HomogeneousIdeal.irrelevant 𝒜 ≤ asHomogeneousIdeal
attribute [instance] ProjectiveSpectrum.isPrime
namespace ProjectiveSpectrum
instance (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) : Ideal.IsPrime x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal := x.isPrime
/-- The zero locus of a set `s` of elements of a commutative ring `A` is the set of all relevant
homogeneous prime ideals of the ring that contain the set `s`.
An element `f` of `A` can be thought of as a dependent function on the projective spectrum of `𝒜`.
At a point `x` (a homogeneous prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the
quotient ring `A` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `zeroLocus s` is exactly the subset
of `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜` where all "functions" in `s` vanish simultaneously. -/
def zeroLocus (s : Set A) : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :=
{ x | s ⊆ x.asHomogeneousIdeal }
@[simp]
theorem mem_zeroLocus (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) (s : Set A) :
x ∈ zeroLocus 𝒜 s ↔ s ⊆ x.asHomogeneousIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_span (s : Set A) : zeroLocus 𝒜 (Ideal.span s) = zeroLocus 𝒜 s := by
ext x
exact (Submodule.gi _ _).gc s x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal
variable {𝒜}
/-- The vanishing ideal of a set `t` of points of the projective spectrum of a commutative ring `R`
is the intersection of all the relevant homogeneous prime ideals in the set `t`.
An element `f` of `A` can be thought of as a dependent function on the projective spectrum of `𝒜`.
At a point `x` (a homogeneous prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the
quotient ring `A` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `vanishingIdeal t` is exactly the
ideal of `A` consisting of all "functions" that vanish on all of `t`. -/
def vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜 :=
⨅ (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) (_ : x ∈ t), x.asHomogeneousIdeal
theorem coe_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
(vanishingIdeal t : Set A) =
{ f | ∀ x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asHomogeneousIdeal } := by
ext f
rw [vanishingIdeal, SetLike.mem_coe, ← HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff, HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_iInf,
Submodule.mem_iInf]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
rw [HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_iInf, Submodule.mem_iInf, HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff]
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) (f : A) :
f ∈ vanishingIdeal t ↔ ∀ x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asHomogeneousIdeal := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_vanishingIdeal, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_singleton (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
vanishingIdeal ({x} : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) = x.asHomogeneousIdeal := by
simp [vanishingIdeal]
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) (I : Ideal A) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 I ↔ I ≤ (vanishingIdeal t).toIdeal :=
⟨fun h _ k => (mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mpr fun _ j => (mem_zeroLocus _ _ _).mpr (h j) k, fun h =>
fun x j =>
(mem_zeroLocus _ _ _).mpr (le_trans h fun _ h => ((mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mp h) x j)⟩
variable (𝒜)
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc_ideal :
@GaloisConnection (Ideal A) (Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜))ᵒᵈ _ _
(fun I => zeroLocus 𝒜 I) fun t => (vanishingIdeal t).toIdeal :=
fun I t => subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal t I
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc_set :
@GaloisConnection (Set A) (Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜))ᵒᵈ _ _
(fun s => zeroLocus 𝒜 s) fun t => vanishingIdeal t := by
have ideal_gc : GaloisConnection Ideal.span _ := (Submodule.gi A _).gc
simpa [zeroLocus_span, Function.comp_def] using GaloisConnection.compose ideal_gc (gc_ideal 𝒜)
theorem gc_homogeneousIdeal :
@GaloisConnection (HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) (Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜))ᵒᵈ _ _
(fun I => zeroLocus 𝒜 I) fun t => vanishingIdeal t :=
fun I t => by
simpa [show I.toIdeal ≤ (vanishingIdeal t).toIdeal ↔ I ≤ vanishingIdeal t from Iff.rfl] using
subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal t I.toIdeal
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) (s : Set A) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 s ↔ s ⊆ vanishingIdeal t :=
(gc_set _) s t
theorem subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (s : Set A) : s ⊆ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus 𝒜 s) :=
(gc_set _).le_u_l s
theorem ideal_le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal A) :
I ≤ (vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus 𝒜 I)).toIdeal :=
(gc_ideal _).le_u_l I
theorem homogeneousIdeal_le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) :
I ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus 𝒜 I) :=
(gc_homogeneousIdeal _).le_u_l I
theorem subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 (vanishingIdeal t) :=
(gc_ideal _).l_u_le t
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono {s t : Set A} (h : s ⊆ t) : zeroLocus 𝒜 t ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 s :=
(gc_set _).monotone_l h
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal {s t : Ideal A} (h : s ≤ t) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 (t : Set A) ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 (s : Set A) :=
(gc_ideal _).monotone_l h
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono_homogeneousIdeal {s t : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} (h : s ≤ t) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 (t : Set A) ⊆ zeroLocus 𝒜 (s : Set A) :=
(gc_homogeneousIdeal _).monotone_l h
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono {s t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
vanishingIdeal t ≤ vanishingIdeal s :=
(gc_ideal _).monotone_u h
theorem zeroLocus_bot : zeroLocus 𝒜 ((⊥ : Ideal A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
(gc_ideal 𝒜).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_zero : zeroLocus 𝒜 ({0} : Set A) = Set.univ :=
zeroLocus_bot _
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_empty : zeroLocus 𝒜 (∅ : Set A) = Set.univ :=
(gc_set 𝒜).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_univ : vanishingIdeal (∅ : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) = ⊤ := by
simpa using (gc_ideal _).u_top
theorem zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem {s : Set A} (h : (1 : A) ∈ s) : zeroLocus 𝒜 s = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun x hx =>
(inferInstance : x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.IsPrime).ne_top <|
x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.eq_top_iff_one.mpr <| hx h
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_one : zeroLocus 𝒜 ({1} : Set A) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem 𝒜 (Set.mem_singleton (1 : A))
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_univ : zeroLocus 𝒜 (Set.univ : Set A) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem _ (Set.mem_univ 1)
theorem zeroLocus_sup_ideal (I J : Ideal A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ((I ⊔ J : Ideal A) : Set A) = zeroLocus _ I ∩ zeroLocus _ J :=
(gc_ideal 𝒜).l_sup
theorem zeroLocus_sup_homogeneousIdeal (I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ((I ⊔ J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : Set A) = zeroLocus _ I ∩ zeroLocus _ J :=
(gc_homogeneousIdeal 𝒜).l_sup
theorem zeroLocus_union (s s' : Set A) : zeroLocus 𝒜 (s ∪ s') = zeroLocus _ s ∩ zeroLocus _ s' :=
(gc_set 𝒜).l_sup
theorem vanishingIdeal_union (t t' : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
vanishingIdeal (t ∪ t') = vanishingIdeal t ⊓ vanishingIdeal t' := by
ext1; exact (gc_ideal 𝒜).u_inf
theorem zeroLocus_iSup_ideal {γ : Sort*} (I : γ → Ideal A) :
zeroLocus _ ((⨆ i, I i : Ideal A) : Set A) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus 𝒜 (I i) :=
(gc_ideal 𝒜).l_iSup
theorem zeroLocus_iSup_homogeneousIdeal {γ : Sort*} (I : γ → HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) :
zeroLocus _ ((⨆ i, I i : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : Set A) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus 𝒜 (I i) :=
(gc_homogeneousIdeal 𝒜).l_iSup
theorem zeroLocus_iUnion {γ : Sort*} (s : γ → Set A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 (⋃ i, s i) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus 𝒜 (s i) :=
(gc_set 𝒜).l_iSup
theorem zeroLocus_bUnion (s : Set (Set A)) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 (⋃ s' ∈ s, s' : Set A) = ⋂ s' ∈ s, zeroLocus 𝒜 s' := by
simp only [zeroLocus_iUnion]
theorem vanishingIdeal_iUnion {γ : Sort*} (t : γ → Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
vanishingIdeal (⋃ i, t i) = ⨅ i, vanishingIdeal (t i) :=
HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective <| by
convert (gc_ideal 𝒜).u_iInf; exact HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_iInf _
theorem zeroLocus_inf (I J : Ideal A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ((I ⊓ J : Ideal A) : Set A) = zeroLocus 𝒜 I ∪ zeroLocus 𝒜 J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.isPrime.inf_le
theorem union_zeroLocus (s s' : Set A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 s ∪ zeroLocus 𝒜 s' = zeroLocus 𝒜 (Ideal.span s ⊓ Ideal.span s' : Ideal A) := by
rw [zeroLocus_inf]
simp
theorem zeroLocus_mul_ideal (I J : Ideal A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ((I * J : Ideal A) : Set A) = zeroLocus 𝒜 I ∪ zeroLocus 𝒜 J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.isPrime.mul_le
theorem zeroLocus_mul_homogeneousIdeal (I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ((I * J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : Set A) = zeroLocus 𝒜 I ∪ zeroLocus 𝒜 J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.isPrime.mul_le
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_mul (f g : A) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ({f * g} : Set A) = zeroLocus 𝒜 {f} ∪ zeroLocus 𝒜 {g} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.isPrime.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_pow (f : A) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 ({f ^ n} : Set A) = zeroLocus 𝒜 {f} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.isPrime.pow_mem_iff_mem n hn
theorem sup_vanishingIdeal_le (t t' : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
vanishingIdeal t ⊔ vanishingIdeal t' ≤ vanishingIdeal (t ∩ t') := by
intro r
rw [← HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff, HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_sup, mem_vanishingIdeal,
Submodule.mem_sup]
rintro ⟨f, hf, g, hg, rfl⟩ x ⟨hxt, hxt'⟩
rw [HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff, mem_vanishingIdeal] at hf hg
apply Submodule.add_mem <;> solve_by_elim
theorem mem_compl_zeroLocus_iff_not_mem {f : A} {I : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜} :
I ∈ (zeroLocus 𝒜 {f} : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜))ᶜ ↔ f ∉ I.asHomogeneousIdeal := by
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_zeroLocus, Set.singleton_subset_iff]; rfl
/-- The Zariski topology on the prime spectrum of a commutative ring is defined via the closed sets
of the topology: they are exactly those sets that are the zero locus of a subset of the ring. -/
instance zariskiTopology : TopologicalSpace (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :=
TopologicalSpace.ofClosed (Set.range (ProjectiveSpectrum.zeroLocus 𝒜)) ⟨Set.univ, by simp⟩
(by
intro Zs h
rw [Set.sInter_eq_iInter]
let f : Zs → Set _ := fun i => Classical.choose (h i.2)
have H : (Set.iInter fun i ↦ zeroLocus 𝒜 (f i)) ∈ Set.range (zeroLocus 𝒜) :=
⟨_, zeroLocus_iUnion 𝒜 _⟩
convert H using 2
funext i
exact (Classical.choose_spec (h i.2)).symm)
(by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, (union_zeroLocus 𝒜 s t).symm⟩)
/-- The underlying topology of `Proj` is the projective spectrum of graded ring `A`. -/
def top : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) : IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s, Uᶜ = zeroLocus 𝒜 s := by
simp only [@eq_comm _ Uᶜ]; rfl
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus (Z : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ s, Z = zeroLocus 𝒜 s := by rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, compl_compl]
theorem isClosed_zeroLocus (s : Set A) : IsClosed (zeroLocus 𝒜 s) := by
rw [isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
zeroLocus 𝒜 (vanishingIdeal t : Set A) = closure t := by
apply Set.Subset.antisymm
· rintro x hx t' ⟨ht', ht⟩
obtain ⟨fs, rfl⟩ : ∃ s, t' = zeroLocus 𝒜 s := by rwa [isClosed_iff_zeroLocus] at ht'
rw [subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal] at ht
exact Set.Subset.trans ht hx
· rw [(isClosed_zeroLocus _ _).closure_subset_iff]
exact subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal 𝒜 t
theorem vanishingIdeal_closure (t : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :
vanishingIdeal (closure t) = vanishingIdeal t := by
have : (vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus 𝒜 (vanishingIdeal t))).toIdeal = _ := (gc_ideal 𝒜).u_l_u_eq_u t
ext1
rw [zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure 𝒜 t] at this
exact this
section BasicOpen
/-- `basicOpen r` is the open subset containing all prime ideals not containing `r`. -/
def basicOpen (r : A) : TopologicalSpace.Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) where
carrier := { x | r ∉ x.asHomogeneousIdeal }
is_open' := ⟨{r}, Set.ext fun _ => Set.singleton_subset_iff.trans <| Classical.not_not.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_basicOpen (f : A) (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
x ∈ basicOpen 𝒜 f ↔ f ∉ x.asHomogeneousIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_coe_basicOpen (f : A) (x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
x ∈ (↑(basicOpen 𝒜 f) : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) ↔ f ∉ x.asHomogeneousIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_basicOpen {a : A} : IsOpen (basicOpen 𝒜 a : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :=
(basicOpen 𝒜 a).isOpen
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl (r : A) :
(basicOpen 𝒜 r : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) = (zeroLocus 𝒜 {r})ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_zeroLocus, Set.singleton_subset_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_one : basicOpen 𝒜 (1 : A) = ⊤ :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_zero : basicOpen 𝒜 (0 : A) = ⊥ :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp
theorem basicOpen_mul (f g : A) : basicOpen 𝒜 (f * g) = basicOpen 𝒜 f ⊓ basicOpen 𝒜 g :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp [zeroLocus_singleton_mul]
theorem basicOpen_mul_le_left (f g : A) : basicOpen 𝒜 (f * g) ≤ basicOpen 𝒜 f := by
rw [basicOpen_mul 𝒜 f g]
exact inf_le_left
theorem basicOpen_mul_le_right (f g : A) : basicOpen 𝒜 (f * g) ≤ basicOpen 𝒜 g := by
rw [basicOpen_mul 𝒜 f g]
exact inf_le_right
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_pow (f : A) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : basicOpen 𝒜 (f ^ n) = basicOpen 𝒜 f :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simpa using zeroLocus_singleton_pow 𝒜 f n hn
theorem basicOpen_eq_union_of_projection (f : A) :
basicOpen 𝒜 f = ⨆ i : ℕ, basicOpen 𝒜 (GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i f) :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <|
Set.ext fun z => by
rw [mem_coe_basicOpen, mem_coe, iSup, TopologicalSpace.Opens.mem_sSup]
constructor <;> intro hz
· rcases show ∃ i, GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i f ∉ z.asHomogeneousIdeal by
contrapose! hz with H
classical
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 f]
apply Ideal.sum_mem _ fun i _ => H i with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨basicOpen 𝒜 (GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i f), ⟨i, rfl⟩, by rwa [mem_basicOpen]⟩
· obtain ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hz⟩ := hz
exact fun rid => hz (z.1.2 i rid)
theorem isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens :
TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis
(Set.range fun r : A => (basicOpen 𝒜 r : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜))) := by
apply TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro _ ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact isOpen_basicOpen 𝒜
· rintro p U hp ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [← compl_compl U, Set.mem_compl_iff, ← hs, mem_zeroLocus, Set.not_subset] at hp
obtain ⟨f, hfs, hfp⟩ := hp
refine ⟨basicOpen 𝒜 f, ⟨f, rfl⟩, hfp, ?_⟩
rw [← Set.compl_subset_compl, ← hs, basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl, compl_compl]
exact zeroLocus_anti_mono 𝒜 (Set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr hfs)
end BasicOpen
section Order
/-!
## The specialization order
We endow `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜` with a partial order,
where `x ≤ y` if and only if `y ∈ closure {x}`.
-/
instance : PartialOrder (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :=
PartialOrder.lift asHomogeneousIdeal fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _⟩ => by simp only [mk.injEq, imp_self]
@[simp]
theorem as_ideal_le_as_ideal (x y : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
x.asHomogeneousIdeal ≤ y.asHomogeneousIdeal ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem as_ideal_lt_as_ideal (x y : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
x.asHomogeneousIdeal < y.asHomogeneousIdeal ↔ x < y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_mem_closure (x y : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜) :
x ≤ y ↔ y ∈ closure ({x} : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) := by
| rw [← as_ideal_le_as_ideal, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, mem_zeroLocus,
vanishingIdeal_singleton]
simp only [as_ideal_le_as_ideal, coe_subset_coe]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/Topology.lean | 426 | 428 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Equitable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Finite equipartitions
This file defines finite equipartitions, the partitions whose parts all are the same size up to a
difference of `1`.
## Main declarations
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition`: Predicate for a `Finpartition` to be an equipartition.
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition.exists_partPreservingEquiv`: part-preserving enumeration of a finset
equipped with an equipartition. Indices of elements in the same part are congruent modulo
the number of parts.
-/
open Finset Fintype
namespace Finpartition
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s)
/-- An equipartition is a partition whose parts are all the same size, up to a difference of `1`. -/
def IsEquipartition : Prop :=
(P.parts : Set (Finset α)).EquitableOn card
theorem isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average :
P.IsEquipartition ↔
∀ a : Finset α, a ∈ P.parts → #a = #s / #P.parts ∨ #a = #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
simp_rw [IsEquipartition, Finset.equitableOn_iff, P.sum_card_parts]
variable {P}
lemma not_isEquipartition :
¬P.IsEquipartition ↔ ∃ a ∈ P.parts, ∃ b ∈ P.parts, #b + 1 < #a := Set.not_equitableOn
theorem _root_.Set.Subsingleton.isEquipartition (h : (P.parts : Set (Finset α)).Subsingleton) :
P.IsEquipartition :=
Set.Subsingleton.equitableOn h _
theorem IsEquipartition.card_parts_eq_average (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ∨ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1 :=
P.isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average.1 hP _ ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_eq_average_iff (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ↔ #t ≠ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
have a := hP.card_parts_eq_average ht
have b : ¬(#t = #s / #P.parts ∧ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1) := by
by_contra h; exact absurd (h.1 ▸ h.2) (lt_add_one _).ne
tauto
theorem IsEquipartition.average_le_card_part (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#s / #P.parts ≤ #t := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le hP ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_le_average_add_one (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t ≤ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le_add_one hP ht
theorem IsEquipartition.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
{p ∈ P.parts | ¬#p = #s / #P.parts + 1} = {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts} := by
ext p
simp only [mem_filter, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hp ↦ (hP.card_part_eq_average_iff hp).symm
/-- An equipartition of a finset with `n` elements into `k` parts has
`n % k` parts of size `n / k + 1`. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.card_large_parts_eq_mod (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
#{p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts + 1} = #s % #P.parts := by
have z := P.sum_card_parts
rw [← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not (s := P.parts) (p := fun x ↦ #x = #s / #P.parts + 1),
hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average, sum_const_nat (m := #s / #P.parts + 1) (by simp),
sum_const_nat (m := #s / #P.parts) (by simp), ← hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average,
mul_add, add_comm, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_one, add_comm #_,
filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card, add_comm] at z
rw [← add_left_inj, Nat.mod_add_div, z]
/-- An equipartition of a finset with `n` elements into `k` parts has
`n - n % k` parts of size `n / k`. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.card_small_parts_eq_mod (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
#{p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts} = #P.parts - #s % #P.parts := by
conv_rhs =>
arg 1
rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (p := fun p ↦ #p = #s / #P.parts + 1)]
rw [hP.card_large_parts_eq_mod, add_tsub_cancel_left, hP.filter_ne_average_add_one_eq_average]
/-- There exists an enumeration of an equipartition's parts where
larger parts map to smaller numbers and vice versa. -/
theorem IsEquipartition.exists_partsEquiv (hP : P.IsEquipartition) :
∃ f : P.parts ≃ Fin #P.parts, ∀ t, #t.1 = #s / #P.parts + 1 ↔ f t < #s % #P.parts := by
let el := {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts + 1}.equivFin
| let es := {p ∈ P.parts | #p = #s / #P.parts}.equivFin
simp_rw [mem_filter, hP.card_large_parts_eq_mod] at el
simp_rw [mem_filter, hP.card_small_parts_eq_mod] at es
let sneg :
{x // x ∈ P.parts ∧ ¬#x = #s / #P.parts + 1} ≃ {x // x ∈ P.parts ∧ #x = #s / #P.parts} := by
apply (Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv
simp only [Equiv.refl_apply, and_congr_right_iff]
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Equipartition.lean | 104 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
/-! # Functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-σ-algebra
A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different.
We define `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ`, the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to an `m`-strongly
measurable function.
## Main statements
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of `lpMeas`.
`Lp.induction_stronglyMeasurable` (see also `MemLp.induction_stronglyMeasurable`):
To prove something for an `Lp` function a.e. strongly measurable with respect to a
sub-σ-algebra `m` in a normed space, it suffices to show that
* the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions which are measurable w.r.t. `m`;
* is closed under addition;
* the set of functions in `Lp` strongly measurable w.r.t. `m` for which the property holds is
closed.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different. -/
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable (since := "2025-01-23")]
def AEStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (m : MeasurableSpace α)
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Prop := AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ
namespace AEStronglyMeasurable'
variable {α β 𝕜 : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace β]
{f g : α → β}
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.congr (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem congr (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ := AEStronglyMeasurable.congr hf hfg
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.mono (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem mono {m'} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hm : m ≤ m') :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m'] f μ := AEStronglyMeasurable.mono hm hf
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.add (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem add [Add β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (f + g) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.add hf hg
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.neg (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem neg [Neg β] [ContinuousNeg β] {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) :
| AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (-f) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hfm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.sub (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem sub [AddGroup β] [IsTopologicalAddGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/AEMeasurable.lean | 71 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.Criterion
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.ScaleRoots
/-!
# Eisenstein polynomials
Given an ideal `𝓟` of a commutative semiring `R`, we say that a polynomial `f : R[X]` is
*Eisenstein at `𝓟`* if `f.leadingCoeff ∉ 𝓟`, `∀ n, n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟` and
`f.coeff 0 ∉ 𝓟 ^ 2`. In this file we gather miscellaneous results about Eisenstein polynomials.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.IsEisensteinAt f 𝓟`: the property of being Eisenstein at `𝓟`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.IsEisensteinAt.irreducible`: if a primitive `f` satisfies `f.IsEisensteinAt 𝓟`,
where `𝓟.IsPrime`, then `f` is irreducible.
## Implementation details
We also define a notion `IsWeaklyEisensteinAt` requiring only that
`∀ n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟`. This makes certain results slightly more general and it is
useful since it is sometimes better behaved (for example it is stable under `Polynomial.map`).
-/
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u}
open Ideal Algebra Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
/-- Given an ideal `𝓟` of a commutative semiring `R`, we say that a polynomial `f : R[X]`
is *weakly Eisenstein at `𝓟`* if `∀ n, n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsWeaklyEisensteinAt [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (𝓟 : Ideal R) : Prop where
mem : ∀ {n}, n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟
/-- Given an ideal `𝓟` of a commutative semiring `R`, we say that a polynomial `f : R[X]`
is *Eisenstein at `𝓟`* if `f.leadingCoeff ∉ 𝓟`, `∀ n, n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟` and
`f.coeff 0 ∉ 𝓟 ^ 2`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsEisensteinAt [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (𝓟 : Ideal R) : Prop where
leading : f.leadingCoeff ∉ 𝓟
mem : ∀ {n}, n < f.natDegree → f.coeff n ∈ 𝓟
not_mem : f.coeff 0 ∉ 𝓟 ^ 2
namespace IsWeaklyEisensteinAt
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {𝓟 : Ideal R} {f : R[X]}
theorem map (hf : f.IsWeaklyEisensteinAt 𝓟) {A : Type v} [CommSemiring A] (φ : R →+* A) :
(f.map φ).IsWeaklyEisensteinAt (𝓟.map φ) := by
refine (isWeaklyEisensteinAt_iff _ _).2 fun hn => ?_
rw [coeff_map]
exact mem_map_of_mem _ (hf.mem (lt_of_lt_of_le hn natDegree_map_le))
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {𝓟 : Ideal R} {f : R[X]}
variable {S : Type v} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
section Principal
variable {p : R}
theorem exists_mem_adjoin_mul_eq_pow_natDegree {x : S} (hx : aeval x f = 0) (hmo : f.Monic)
(hf : f.IsWeaklyEisensteinAt (Submodule.span R {p})) : ∃ y ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set S),
(algebraMap R S) p * y = x ^ (f.map (algebraMap R S)).natDegree := by
rw [aeval_def, Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map, eval_eq_sum_range, range_add_one,
sum_insert not_mem_range_self, sum_range, (hmo.map (algebraMap R S)).coeff_natDegree,
| one_mul] at hx
replace hx := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hx
have : ∀ n < f.natDegree, p ∣ f.coeff n := by
intro n hn
exact mem_span_singleton.1 (by simpa using hf.mem hn)
choose! φ hφ using this
conv_rhs at hx =>
congr
congr
· skip
ext i
rw [coeff_map, hφ i.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 natDegree_map_le),
RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc]
rw [hx, ← mul_sum, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, ← mul_assoc (-1 : S), mul_comm (-1 : S), mul_assoc]
refine
⟨-1 * ∑ i : Fin (f.map (algebraMap R S)).natDegree, (algebraMap R S) (φ i.1) * x ^ i.1, ?_, rfl⟩
exact
Subalgebra.mul_mem _ (Subalgebra.neg_mem _ (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
(Subalgebra.sum_mem _ fun i _ =>
Subalgebra.mul_mem _ (Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _)
(Subalgebra.pow_mem _ (subset_adjoin (Set.mem_singleton x)) _))
theorem exists_mem_adjoin_mul_eq_pow_natDegree_le {x : S} (hx : aeval x f = 0) (hmo : f.Monic)
(hf : f.IsWeaklyEisensteinAt (Submodule.span R {p})) :
∀ i, (f.map (algebraMap R S)).natDegree ≤ i →
∃ y ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set S), (algebraMap R S) p * y = x ^ i := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Eisenstein/Basic.lean | 83 | 108 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.RelativeCellComplex.AttachCells
/-!
# Construction for the small object argument
Given a family of morphisms `f i : A i ⟶ B i` in a category `C`,
we define a functor
`SmallObject.functor f : Arrow S ⥤ Arrow S` which sends
an object given by arrow `πX : X ⟶ S` to the pushout `functorObj f πX`:
```
∐ functorObjSrcFamily f πX ⟶ X
| |
| |
v v
∐ functorObjTgtFamily f πX ⟶ functorObj f πX
```
where the morphism on the left is a coproduct (of copies of maps `f i`)
indexed by a type `FunctorObjIndex f πX` which parametrizes the
diagrams of the form
```
A i ⟶ X
| |
| |
v v
B i ⟶ S
```
The morphism `ιFunctorObj f πX : X ⟶ functorObj f πX` is part of
a natural transformation `SmallObject.ε f : 𝟭 (Arrow C) ⟶ functor f S`.
The main idea in this construction is that for any commutative square
as above, there may not exist a lifting `B i ⟶ X`, but the construction
provides a tautological morphism `B i ⟶ functorObj f πX`
(see `SmallObject.ιFunctorObj_extension`).
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/small+object+argument
-/
universe t w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits HomotopicalAlgebra
namespace SmallObject
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {I : Type w} {A B : I → C} (f : ∀ i, A i ⟶ B i)
section
variable {S X : C} (πX : X ⟶ S)
/-- Given a family of morphisms `f i : A i ⟶ B i` and a morphism `πX : X ⟶ S`,
this type parametrizes the commutative squares with a morphism `f i` on the left
and `πX` in the right. -/
structure FunctorObjIndex where
/-- an element in the index type -/
i : I
/-- the top morphism in the square -/
t : A i ⟶ X
/-- the bottom morphism in the square -/
b : B i ⟶ S
w : t ≫ πX = f i ≫ b
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] FunctorObjIndex.w
variable [HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete (FunctorObjIndex f πX)) C]
/-- The family of objects `A x.i` parametrized by `x : FunctorObjIndex f πX`. -/
abbrev functorObjSrcFamily (x : FunctorObjIndex f πX) : C := A x.i
/-- The family of objects `B x.i` parametrized by `x : FunctorObjIndex f πX`. -/
abbrev functorObjTgtFamily (x : FunctorObjIndex f πX) : C := B x.i
/-- The family of the morphisms `f x.i : A x.i ⟶ B x.i`
parametrized by `x : FunctorObjIndex f πX`. -/
abbrev functorObjLeftFamily (x : FunctorObjIndex f πX) :
functorObjSrcFamily f πX x ⟶ functorObjTgtFamily f πX x := f x.i
/-- The top morphism in the pushout square in the definition of `pushoutObj f πX`. -/
noncomputable abbrev functorObjTop : ∐ functorObjSrcFamily f πX ⟶ X :=
Limits.Sigma.desc (fun x => x.t)
/-- The left morphism in the pushout square in the definition of `pushoutObj f πX`. -/
noncomputable abbrev functorObjLeft :
∐ functorObjSrcFamily f πX ⟶ ∐ functorObjTgtFamily f πX :=
Limits.Sigma.map (functorObjLeftFamily f πX)
variable [HasPushout (functorObjTop f πX) (functorObjLeft f πX)]
/-- The functor `SmallObject.functor f : Arrow C ⥤ Arrow C` that is part of
the small object argument for a family of morphisms `f`, on an object given
as a morphism `πX : X ⟶ S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev functorObj : C :=
pushout (functorObjTop f πX) (functorObjLeft f πX)
/-- The canonical morphism `X ⟶ functorObj f πX`. -/
noncomputable abbrev ιFunctorObj : X ⟶ functorObj f πX := pushout.inl _ _
/-- The canonical morphism `∐ (functorObjTgtFamily f πX) ⟶ functorObj f πX`. -/
noncomputable abbrev ρFunctorObj : ∐ functorObjTgtFamily f πX ⟶ functorObj f πX := pushout.inr _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma functorObj_comm :
functorObjTop f πX ≫ ιFunctorObj f πX = functorObjLeft f πX ≫ ρFunctorObj f πX :=
pushout.condition
lemma functorObj_isPushout :
IsPushout (functorObjTop f πX) (functorObjLeft f πX) (ιFunctorObj f πX) (ρFunctorObj f πX) :=
IsPushout.of_hasPushout _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma FunctorObjIndex.comm (x : FunctorObjIndex f πX) :
f x.i ≫ Sigma.ι (functorObjTgtFamily f πX) x ≫ ρFunctorObj f πX = x.t ≫ ιFunctorObj f πX := by
simpa using (Sigma.ι (functorObjSrcFamily f πX) x ≫= functorObj_comm f πX).symm
/-- The canonical projection on the base object. -/
noncomputable abbrev π'FunctorObj : ∐ functorObjTgtFamily f πX ⟶ S := Sigma.desc (fun x => x.b)
/-- The canonical projection on the base object. -/
noncomputable def πFunctorObj : functorObj f πX ⟶ S :=
pushout.desc πX (π'FunctorObj f πX) (by ext; simp [π'FunctorObj])
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ρFunctorObj_π : ρFunctorObj f πX ≫ πFunctorObj f πX = π'FunctorObj f πX := by
simp [πFunctorObj]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιFunctorObj_πFunctorObj : ιFunctorObj f πX ≫ πFunctorObj f πX = πX := by
simp [ιFunctorObj, πFunctorObj]
/-- The morphism `ιFunctorObj f πX : X ⟶ functorObj f πX` is obtained by
attaching `f`-cells. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def attachCellsιFunctorObj :
AttachCells.{max v w} f (ιFunctorObj f πX) where
ι := FunctorObjIndex f πX
π x := x.i
isColimit₁ := coproductIsCoproduct _
isColimit₂ := coproductIsCoproduct _
m := functorObjLeft f πX
g₁ := functorObjTop f πX
g₂ := ρFunctorObj f πX
isPushout := IsPushout.of_hasPushout (functorObjTop f πX) (functorObjLeft f πX)
cofan₁ := _
cofan₂ := _
section Small
variable [LocallySmall.{t} C] [Small.{t} I]
instance : Small.{t} (FunctorObjIndex f πX) := by
let φ (x : FunctorObjIndex f πX) :
Σ (i : Shrink.{t} I),
Shrink.{t} ((A ((equivShrink _).symm i) ⟶ X) ×
(B ((equivShrink _).symm i) ⟶ S)) :=
⟨equivShrink _ x.i, equivShrink _
⟨eqToHom (by simp) ≫ x.t, eqToHom (by simp) ≫ x.b⟩⟩
have hφ : Function.Injective φ := by
rintro ⟨i₁, t₁, b₁, _⟩ ⟨i₂, t₂, b₂, _⟩ h
obtain rfl : i₁ = i₂ := by simpa [φ] using congr_arg Sigma.fst h
simpa [cancel_epi, φ] using h
exact small_of_injective hφ
instance : Small.{t} (attachCellsιFunctorObj f πX).ι := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- The morphism `ιFunctorObj f πX : X ⟶ functorObj f πX` is obtained by
attaching `f`-cells, and the index type can be chosen to be in `Type t`
if the category is `t`-locally small and the index type for `f`
is `t`-small. -/
noncomputable def attachCellsιFunctorObjOfSmall :
AttachCells.{t} f (ιFunctorObj f πX) :=
(attachCellsιFunctorObj f πX).reindex (equivShrink.{t} _).symm
end Small
section
variable {S T X Y : C} {πX : X ⟶ S} {πY : Y ⟶ T} (τ : Arrow.mk πX ⟶ Arrow.mk πY)
[HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete (FunctorObjIndex f πX)) C]
[HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete (FunctorObjIndex f πY)) C]
|
/-- The canonical morphism `∐ (functorObjSrcFamily f πX) ⟶ ∐ (functorObjSrcFamily f πY)`
induced by a morphism `Arrow.mk πX ⟶ Arrow.mk πY`. -/
noncomputable def functorMapSrc :
∐ (functorObjSrcFamily f πX) ⟶ ∐ functorObjSrcFamily f πY :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/SmallObject/Construction.lean | 194 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : #σ.support < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_mul {f g : Perm α} (h : f.Disjoint g) :
(f * g).cycleType = f.cycleType + g.cycleType := by
simp only [Perm.cycleType]
rw [h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union]
simp only [Finset.union_val, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _, Multiset.map_add]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_val, Disjoint.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j))
(hs' : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j) :=
hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute)) :
(s.noncommProd k hs').cycleType = s.sum fun i ↦ (k i).cycleType := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.sum_insert hi]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rwa [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, Multiset.singleton_inj] at h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : #σ.support ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
theorem isConj_iff_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.cycleType = τ.cycleType :=
⟨fun h => by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 h
rw [cycleType_conj], isConj_of_cycleType_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_extendDomain {β : Type*} [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] {p : β → Prop}
[DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
cycleType (g.extendDomain f) = cycleType g := by
induction g using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => rw [extendDomain_one, cycleType_one, cycleType_one]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
rw [(hσ.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ.cycleType, card_support_extend_domain]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ =>
rw [hd.cycleType, ← extendDomain_mul, (hd.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ, hτ]
theorem cycleType_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {g : Perm (Subtype p)} :
cycleType (ofSubtype g) = cycleType g :=
cycleType_extendDomain (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
theorem mem_cycleType_iff {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} :
n ∈ cycleType σ ↔ ∃ c τ, σ = c * τ ∧ Disjoint c τ ∧ IsCycle c ∧ c.support.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hlc, hld⟩ := truncCycleFactors σ
rw [cycleType_eq _ rfl hlc hld, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨c, cl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [(List.perm_cons_erase cl).pairwise_iff @(Disjoint.symmetric)] at hld
refine ⟨c, (l.erase c).prod, ?_, ?_, hlc _ cl, rfl⟩
· rw [← List.prod_cons, (List.perm_cons_erase cl).symm.prod_eq' (hld.imp Disjoint.commute)]
· exact disjoint_prod_right _ fun g => List.rel_of_pairwise_cons hld
· rintro ⟨c, t, rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩
simp [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType]
theorem le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} (h : n ∈ cycleType σ) :
n ≤ #σ.support :=
(le_sum_of_mem h).trans (le_of_eq σ.sum_cycleType)
theorem cycleType_of_card_le_mem_cycleType_add_two {n : ℕ} {g : Perm α}
(hn2 : Fintype.card α < n + 2) (hng : n ∈ g.cycleType) : g.cycleType = {n} := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 hng
suffices g'1 : g' = 1 by
rw [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType, g'1, cycleType_one, add_zero]
contrapose! hn2 with g'1
apply le_trans _ (c * g').support.card_le_univ
rw [hd.card_support_mul]
exact add_le_add_left (two_le_card_support_of_ne_one g'1) _
end CycleType
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
open Function in
/-- The number of fixed points of a `p ^ n`-th root of the identity function over a finite set
and the set's cardinality have the same residue modulo `p`, where `p` is a prime. -/
theorem card_fixedPoints_modEq [DecidableEq α] {f : Function.End α} {p n : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hf : f ^ p ^ n = 1) :
Fintype.card α ≡ Fintype.card f.fixedPoints [MOD p] := by
let σ : α ≃ α := ⟨f, f ^ (p ^ n - 1),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_sub_mul_pow f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_mul_pow_sub f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf)⟩
have hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1 := by
rw [DFunLike.ext'_iff, coe_pow]
exact (hom_coe_pow (fun g : Function.End α ↦ g) rfl (fun g h ↦ rfl) f (p ^ n)).symm.trans hf
suffices Fintype.card f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ.card from
this ▸ (card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm
suffices f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ by
simp only [this]; apply Fintype.card_coe
simp [σ, Set.ext_iff, IsFixedPt]
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : ¬p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : ∃ a : α, σ a = a := by
classical
contrapose! hα
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hα
exact Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((congr_arg _ (Finset.card_eq_zero.2 (compl_eq_bot.2 hα))).mp
(card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm)
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime' {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) {a : α} (ha : σ a = a) : ∃ b : α, σ b = b ∧ b ≠ a := by
classical
have h : ∀ b : α, b ∈ σ.supportᶜ ↔ σ b = b := fun b => by
rw [Finset.mem_compl, mem_support, Classical.not_not]
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := Finset.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hp.out.one_lt.trans_le
(Nat.le_of_dvd (Finset.card_pos.mpr ⟨a, (h a).mpr ha⟩) (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp
((card_compl_support_modEq hσ).trans (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr hα))))) a
exact ⟨b, (h b).mp hb1, hb2⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : Fintype.card α < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
classical exact isCycle_of_prime_order h1 (lt_of_le_of_lt σ.support.card_le_univ h2)
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order'' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h2 : orderOf σ = Fintype.card α) : σ.IsCycle :=
isCycle_of_prime_order' ((congr_arg Nat.Prime h2).mpr h1) <| by
rw [← one_mul (Fintype.card α), ← h2, mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ)]
exact one_lt_two
section Cauchy
variable (G : Type*) [Group G] (n : ℕ)
/-- The type of vectors with terms from `G`, length `n`, and product equal to `1:G`. -/
def vectorsProdEqOne : Set (List.Vector G n) :=
{ v | v.toList.prod = 1 }
namespace VectorsProdEqOne
theorem mem_iff {n : ℕ} (v : List.Vector G n) : v ∈ vectorsProdEqOne G n ↔ v.toList.prod = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem zero_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 0 = {Vector.nil} :=
Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨Eq.refl (1 : G), fun v _ => v.eq_nil⟩
theorem one_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 1 = {Vector.nil.cons 1} := by
simp_rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_iff, List.Vector.toList_singleton,
List.prod_singleton, List.Vector.head_cons, true_and]
exact fun v hv => v.cons_head_tail.symm.trans (congr_arg₂ Vector.cons hv v.tail.eq_nil)
instance zeroUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) := by
rw [zero_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton Vector.nil
instance oneUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 1) := by
rw [one_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton (Vector.nil.cons 1)
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n`, make a vector of length `n + 1` whose product is `1`,
by appending the inverse of the product of `v`. -/
@[simps]
def vectorEquiv : List.Vector G n ≃ vectorsProdEqOne G (n + 1) where
toFun v := ⟨v.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v, by
rw [mem_iff, Vector.toList_cons, List.prod_cons, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
invFun v := v.1.tail
left_inv v := v.tail_cons v.toList.prod⁻¹
right_inv v := Subtype.ext <|
calc
v.1.tail.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v.1.tail = v.1.head ::ᵥ v.1.tail :=
congr_arg (· ::ᵥ v.1.tail) <| Eq.symm <| eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by
rw [← List.prod_cons, ← Vector.toList_cons, v.1.cons_head_tail]
exact v.2
_ = v.1 := v.1.cons_head_tail
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n` whose product is 1, make a vector of length `n - 1`,
by deleting the last entry of `v`. -/
def equivVector : ∀ n, vectorsProdEqOne G n ≃ List.Vector G (n - 1)
| 0 => (ofUnique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) (vectorsProdEqOne G 1)).trans (vectorEquiv G 0).symm
| (n + 1) => (vectorEquiv G n).symm
instance [Fintype G] : Fintype (vectorsProdEqOne G n) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (List.Vector G (n - 1)) (equivVector G n).symm
theorem card [Fintype G] : Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G n) = Fintype.card G ^ (n - 1) :=
(Fintype.card_congr (equivVector G n)).trans (card_vector (n - 1))
variable {G n} {g : G}
variable (v : vectorsProdEqOne G n) (j k : ℕ)
/-- Rotate a vector whose product is 1. -/
def rotate : vectorsProdEqOne G n :=
⟨⟨_, (v.1.1.length_rotate k).trans v.1.2⟩, List.prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one v.2 k⟩
theorem rotate_zero : rotate v 0 = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext v.1.1.rotate_zero)
theorem rotate_rotate : rotate (rotate v j) k = rotate v (j + k) :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (v.1.1.rotate_rotate j k))
theorem rotate_length : rotate v n = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext ((congr_arg _ v.1.2.symm).trans v.1.1.rotate_length))
|
end VectorsProdEqOne
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G` there exists an element of order
`p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem. -/
theorem _root_.exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Fintype.card G) : ∃ x : G, orderOf x = p := by
have hp' : p - 1 ≠ 0 := mt tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt hp.out.one_lt)
have Scard :=
calc
p ∣ Fintype.card G ^ (p - 1) := hdvd.trans (dvd_pow (dvd_refl _) hp')
_ = Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G p) := (VectorsProdEqOne.card G p).symm
let f : ℕ → vectorsProdEqOne G p → vectorsProdEqOne G p := fun k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate v k
have hf1 : ∀ v, f 0 v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_zero
have hf2 : ∀ j k v, f k (f j v) = f (j + k) v := fun j k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_rotate v j k
have hf3 : ∀ v, f p v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_length
let σ :=
Equiv.mk (f 1) (f (p - 1)) (fun s => by rw [hf2, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3])
fun s => by rw [hf2, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3]
have hσ : ∀ k v, (σ ^ k) v = f k v := fun k =>
Nat.rec (fun v => (hf1 v).symm) (fun k hk v => by
rw [pow_succ, Perm.mul_apply, hk (σ v), Nat.succ_eq_one_add, ← hf2 1 k]
simp only [σ, coe_fn_mk]) k
replace hσ : σ ^ p ^ 1 = 1 := Perm.ext fun v => by rw [pow_one, hσ, hf3, one_apply]
let v₀ : vectorsProdEqOne G p :=
⟨List.Vector.replicate p 1, (List.prod_replicate p 1).trans (one_pow p)⟩
have hv₀ : σ v₀ = v₀ := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (List.rotate_replicate (1 : G) p 1))
obtain ⟨v, hv1, hv2⟩ := exists_fixed_point_of_prime' Scard hσ hv₀
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 474 | 504 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.NatCast
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Ordered rings and semirings
This file develops the basics of ordered (semi)rings.
Each typeclass here comprises
* an algebraic class (`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`)
* an order class (`PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`)
* assumptions on how both interact ((strict) monotonicity, canonicity)
For short,
* "`+` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of addition"
* "`+` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of addition"
* "`*` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of multiplication by a nonnegative number".
* "`*` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of multiplication by a positive number".
## Typeclasses
* `OrderedSemiring`: Semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect `≤`.
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respects
`<`.
* `OrderedCommSemiring`: Commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect
`≤`.
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+`
and `*` respect `<`.
* `OrderedRing`: Ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `OrderedCommRing`: Commutative ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such that `+`
respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedRing`: Nontrivial ring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*`
respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`: Nontrivial commutative ring with a linear order such that `+` respects
`≤` and `*` respects `<`.
## Hierarchy
The hardest part of proving order lemmas might be to figure out the correct generality and its
corresponding typeclass. Here's an attempt at demystifying it. For each typeclass, we list its
immediate predecessors and what conditions are added to each of them.
* `OrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `≤`
- `Semiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `≤`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommSemiring`
- `OrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `CommSemiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedRing`
- `OrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommRing`
- `OrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `StrictOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommRing` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & nontriviality & `*` respects `<`
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
* `LinearOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
open Function
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered semiring is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R where
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
/-- A strict ordered semiring is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
class IsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the left
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `c * a < c * b`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the right
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `a * c < b * c`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial
lemma IsOrderedRing.of_mul_nonneg [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] (mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b) :
IsOrderedRing R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ hc (sub_nonneg.2 ab)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ (sub_nonneg.2 ab) hc
lemma IsStrictOrderedRing.of_mul_pos [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [Nontrivial R] (mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b) :
IsStrictOrderedRing R where
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ hc (sub_pos.2 ab)
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ (sub_pos.2 ab) hc
section IsOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toPosMulMono : PosMulMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ h x.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toMulPosMono : MulPosMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ h x.2
end IsOrderedRing
/-- Turn an ordered domain into a strict ordered ring. -/
lemma IsOrderedRing.toIsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*)
[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
IsStrictOrderedRing R :=
.of_mul_pos fun _ _ ap bp ↦ (mul_nonneg ap.le bp.le).lt_of_ne' (mul_ne_zero ap.ne' bp.ne')
section IsStrictOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toPosMulStrictMono : PosMulStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toMulPosStrictMono : MulPosStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing R where
__ := ‹IsStrictOrderedRing R›
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toCharZero :
CharZero R where
cast_injective :=
(strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply lt_add_one).injective
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder R :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a + 1, lt_add_of_pos_right _ one_pos⟩⟩
end IsStrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrder
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors R where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab := by
contrapose! hab
obtain ha | ha := hab.1.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hab.2.lt_or_lt
exacts [(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha hb).ne', (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha hb).ne,
(mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ha hb).ne, (mul_pos ha hb).ne']
-- Note that we can't use `NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain` since we are merely in a semiring.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain : IsDomain R where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero {a b c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_left ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_left_of_pos ha).injective h]
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero {b a c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_right ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_right_of_pos ha).injective h]
end LinearOrder
/-! Note that `OrderDual` does not satisfy any of the ordered ring typeclasses due to the
`zero_le_one` field. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedSemiring` is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedAddCommMonoid R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered semiring. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends OrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ha hc :=
-- parentheses ensure this generates an `optParam` rather than an `autoParam`
(by simpa only [mul_comm] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ha hc)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered ring. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of non-negative elements is non-negative. -/
protected mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone
and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends OrderedRing R, CommRing R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid R,
Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- Left multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- Right multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that
addition is strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is strictly monotone
and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered ring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of two positive elements is positive. -/
protected mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommRing (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedRing R, CommRing R
/- It's not entirely clear we should assume `Nontrivial` at this point; it would be reasonable to
explore changing this, but be warned that the instances involving `Domain` may cause typeclass
search loops. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that
addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` is a nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such
that addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedCommSemiring R,
LinearOrderedSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedRing` is a ring with a linear order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedRing R, LinearOrder R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a linear order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends LinearOrderedRing R, CommMonoid R
attribute [nolint docBlame]
StrictOrderedSemiring.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
StrictOrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
LinearOrderedSemiring.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedRing.toLinearOrder
OrderedSemiring.toOrderedAddCommMonoid
OrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
StrictOrderedCommRing.toCommRing
OrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
OrderedCommRing.toCommRing
StrictOrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
LinearOrderedCommSemiring.toLinearOrderedSemiring
LinearOrderedCommRing.toCommMonoid
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b c : R}
lemma one_add_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : a + b + b * c ≤ c) : 1 + a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_add_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : a + c + b * c ≤ b) : 1 + a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : b + b * c ≤ a + c) : 1 - a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm c]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : c + b * c ≤ a + b) : 1 - a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm b]
gcongr
end OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs.lean | 1,176 | 1,176 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Robin Carlier
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.OfChosenFiniteProducts.Symmetric
/-!
# Categories with chosen finite products
We introduce a class, `ChosenFiniteProducts`, which bundles explicit choices
for a terminal object and binary products in a category `C`.
This is primarily useful for categories which have finite products with good
definitional properties, such as the category of types.
Given a category with such an instance, we also provide the associated
symmetric monoidal structure so that one can write `X ⊗ Y` for the explicit
binary product and `𝟙_ C` for the explicit terminal object.
## Implementation notes
For cartesian monoidal categories, the oplax-monoidal/monoidal/braided structure of a functor `F`
preserving finite products is uniquely determined. See the `ofChosenFiniteProducts` declarations.
We however develop the theory for any `F.OplaxMonoidal`/`F.Monoidal`/`F.Braided` instance instead of
requiring it to be the `ofChosenFiniteProducts` one. This is to avoid diamonds: Consider
eg `𝟭 C` and `F ⋙ G`.
In applications requiring a finite preserving functor to be oplax-monoidal/monoidal/braided,
avoid `attribute [local instance] ofChosenFiniteProducts` but instead turn on the corresponding
`ofChosenFiniteProducts` declaration for that functor only.
# Projects
- Construct an instance of chosen finite products in the category of affine scheme, using
the tensor product.
- Construct chosen finite products in other categories appearing "in nature".
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
/--
An instance of `ChosenFiniteProducts C` bundles an explicit choice of a binary
product of two objects of `C`, and a terminal object in `C`.
Users should use the monoidal notation: `X ⊗ Y` for the product and `𝟙_ C` for
the terminal object.
-/
class ChosenFiniteProducts (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] where
/-- A choice of a limit binary fan for any two objects of the category. -/
product : (X Y : C) → Limits.LimitCone (Limits.pair X Y)
/-- A choice of a terminal object. -/
terminal : Limits.LimitCone (Functor.empty.{0} C)
namespace ChosenFiniteProducts
instance (priority := 100) (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :
MonoidalCategory C :=
monoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts terminal product
instance (priority := 100) (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :
SymmetricCategory C :=
symmetricOfChosenFiniteProducts _ _
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C]
open MonoidalCategory
theorem braiding_eq_braiding (X Y : C) :
(β_ X Y) = Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (product X Y).isLimit (product Y X).isLimit := rfl
/--
The unique map to the terminal object.
-/
def toUnit (X : C) : X ⟶ 𝟙_ C :=
terminal.isLimit.lift <| .mk _ <| .mk (fun x => x.as.elim) fun x => x.as.elim
instance (X : C) : Unique (X ⟶ 𝟙_ C) where
default := toUnit _
uniq _ := terminal.isLimit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => j.elim
/--
This lemma follows from the preexisting `Unique` instance, but
it is often convenient to use it directly as `apply toUnit_unique` forcing
lean to do the necessary elaboration.
-/
lemma toUnit_unique {X : C} (f g : X ⟶ 𝟙_ _) : f = g :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| theorem comp_toUnit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ toUnit Y = toUnit X :=
toUnit_unique _ _
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/ChosenFiniteProducts.lean | 98 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.GeometryOfNumbers
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.VolumeOfBalls
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
/-!
# Convex Bodies
The file contains the definitions of several convex bodies lying in the mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`
associated to a number field of signature `K` and proves several existence theorems by applying
*Minkowski Convex Body Theorem* to those.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodyLT`: The set of points `x` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w` with `f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodySum`: The set of points `x` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal of `K`.
Assume that `f` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)`, then there exists a
nonzero algebraic number `a` in `I` such that `w a < f w` for all infinite places `w`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal
of `K`. Assume that `B` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodySum K B)` (see
`convexBodySum_volume` for the computation of this volume), then there exists a nonzero algebraic
number `a` in `I` such that `|Norm a| < (B / d) ^ d` where `d` is the degree of `K`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace Module
section convexBodyLT
open Metric NNReal
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0)
/-- The convex body defined by `f`: the set of points `x : E` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w`. -/
abbrev convexBodyLT : Set (mixedSpace K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } => ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } => ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) ↔ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x < f w := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, mem_ball_zero_iff, Pi.ringHom_apply, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, Subtype.forall, ← forall₂_or_left, ← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, em,
forall_true_left, norm_embedding_eq]
theorem convexBodyLT_neg_mem (x : mixedSpace K) (hx : x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) := by
simp only [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg] at hx ⊢
exact hx
theorem convexBodyLT_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT K f) :=
Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _))
open Fintype MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure ENNReal
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLT`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodyLTFactor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K * NNReal.pi ^ nrComplexPlaces K
theorem convexBodyLTFactor_ne_zero : convexBodyLTFactor K ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero) (pow_ne_zero _ pi_ne_zero)
theorem one_le_convexBodyLTFactor : 1 ≤ convexBodyLTFactor K :=
one_le_mul (one_le_pow₀ one_le_two) (one_le_pow₀ (one_le_two.trans Real.two_le_pi))
open scoped Classical in
/-- The volume of `(ConvexBodyLt K f)` where `convexBodyLT K f` is the set of points `x`
such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all infinite places `w`. -/
theorem convexBodyLT_volume :
volume (convexBodyLT K f) = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
calc
_ = (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (2 * (f x.val))) *
∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2 * NNReal.pi := by
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_ball, Complex.volume_ball]
_ = ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K
* (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val)))
* ((∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) *
NNReal.pi ^ nrComplexPlaces K) := by
simp_rw [ofReal_mul (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)), Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_univ, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_ofNat]
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ((∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, .ofReal (f x.val)) *
(∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [convexBodyLTFactor, coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow]
ring
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_mul_prod, coe_mul, coe_finset_prod, mult_isReal, mult_isComplex,
pow_one, ENNReal.coe_pow, ofReal_coe_nnreal]
variable {f}
/-- This is a technical result: quite often, we want to impose conditions at all infinite places
but one and choose the value at the remaining place so that we can apply
`exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt`. -/
theorem adjust_f {w₁ : InfinitePlace K} (B : ℝ≥0) (hf : ∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → f w ≠ 0) :
∃ g : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0, (∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → g w = f w) ∧ ∏ w, (g w) ^ mult w = B := by
classical
let S := ∏ w ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₁, (f w) ^ mult w
refine ⟨Function.update f w₁ ((B * S⁻¹) ^ (mult w₁ : ℝ)⁻¹), ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun w hw => Function.update_of_ne hw _ f
· rw [← Finset.mul_prod_erase Finset.univ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₁), Function.update_self,
Finset.prod_congr rfl fun w hw => by rw [Function.update_of_ne (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw)],
← NNReal.rpow_natCast, ← NNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀, NNReal.rpow_one, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀, mul_one]
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
exact fun w hw => pow_ne_zero _ (hf w (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw))
· rw [mult]; split_ifs <;> norm_num
end convexBodyLT
section convexBodyLT'
open Metric ENNReal NNReal
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0) (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
open scoped Classical in
/-- A version of `convexBodyLT` with an additional condition at a fixed complex place. This is
needed to ensure the element constructed is not real, see for example
`exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isComplex`.
-/
abbrev convexBodyLT' : Set (mixedSpace K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } ↦ ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } ↦
if w = w₀ then {x | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < (f w : ℝ) ^ 2} else ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT'_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ ↔
(∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w ≠ w₀ → w x < f w) ∧
|(w₀.val.embedding x).re| < 1 ∧ |(w₀.val.embedding x).im| < (f w₀ : ℝ) ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Pi.ringHom_apply, mem_ball_zero_iff, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, norm_embedding_eq, Subtype.forall]
refine ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w h_ne ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w hw ↦ ?_, fun w hw ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· by_cases hw : IsReal w
· exact norm_embedding_eq w _ ▸ h₁ w hw
· specialize h₂ w (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw)
rw [apply_ite (w.embedding x ∈ ·), Set.mem_setOf_eq,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_embedding_eq] at h₂
rwa [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)] at h₂
· simpa [if_true] using h₂ w₀.val w₀.prop
· exact h₁ w (ne_of_isReal_isComplex hw w₀.prop)
· by_cases h_ne : w = w₀
· simpa [h_ne]
· rw [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)]
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_embedding_eq]
exact h₁ w h_ne
theorem convexBodyLT'_neg_mem (x : mixedSpace K) (hx : x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀) :
-x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ := by
simp only [Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, mem_ball, dist_zero_right, Real.norm_eq_abs,
true_implies, Subtype.forall, Prod.fst_neg, Pi.neg_apply, norm_neg, Prod.snd_neg] at hx ⊢
convert hx using 3
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem convexBodyLT'_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT' K f w₀) := by
refine Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => ?_))
split_ifs
· simp_rw [abs_lt]
refine Convex.inter ((convex_halfSpace_re_gt _).inter (convex_halfSpace_re_lt _))
((convex_halfSpace_im_gt _).inter (convex_halfSpace_im_lt _))
· exact convex_ball _ _
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLT'`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodyLT'Factor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ (nrRealPlaces K + 2) * NNReal.pi ^ (nrComplexPlaces K - 1)
theorem convexBodyLT'Factor_ne_zero : convexBodyLT'Factor K ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero) (pow_ne_zero _ pi_ne_zero)
theorem one_le_convexBodyLT'Factor : 1 ≤ convexBodyLT'Factor K :=
one_le_mul (one_le_pow₀ one_le_two) (one_le_pow₀ (one_le_two.trans Real.two_le_pi))
open scoped Classical in
theorem convexBodyLT'_volume :
volume (convexBodyLT' K f w₀) = convexBodyLT'Factor K * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
have vol_box : ∀ B : ℝ≥0, volume {x : ℂ | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < B^2} = 4*B^2 := by
intro B
rw [← (Complex.volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm).measure_preimage]
· simp_rw [Set.preimage_setOf_eq, Complex.measurableEquivRealProd_symm_apply]
rw [show {a : ℝ × ℝ | |a.1| < 1 ∧ |a.2| < B ^ 2} =
Set.Ioo (-1 : ℝ) (1 : ℝ) ×ˢ Set.Ioo (- (B : ℝ) ^ 2) ((B : ℝ) ^ 2) by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_Ioo, abs_lt]]
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, Real.volume_Ioo, sub_neg_eq_add, one_add_one_eq_two,
← two_mul, ofReal_mul zero_le_two, ofReal_pow (coe_nonneg B), ofReal_ofNat,
ofReal_coe_nnreal, ← mul_assoc, show (2 : ℝ≥0∞) * 2 = 4 by norm_num]
· refine (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_).nullMeasurableSet
· exact measurableSet_lt (measurable_norm.comp Complex.measurable_re) measurable_const
· exact measurableSet_lt (measurable_norm.comp Complex.measurable_im) measurable_const
calc
_ = (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (2 * (f x.val))) *
((∏ x ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₀, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2 * pi) *
(4 * (f w₀) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_ball]
rw [← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀)]
congr 2
· refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun w' hw' ↦ ?_)
rw [if_neg (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw'), Complex.volume_ball]
· simpa only [ite_true] using vol_box (f w₀)
_ = ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K *
(∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val))) *
((∏ x ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₀, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) *
↑pi ^ (nrComplexPlaces K - 1) * (4 * (f w₀) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [ofReal_mul (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)), Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_erase_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _), Finset.card_univ, ofReal_ofNat,
ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_ofNat]
_ = convexBodyLT'Factor K * (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val))
* (∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) := by
rw [show (4 : ℝ≥0∞) = (2 : ℝ≥0) ^ 2 by norm_num, convexBodyLT'Factor, pow_add,
← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₀), ofReal_coe_nnreal]
simp_rw [coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow]
ring
_ = convexBodyLT'Factor K * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_mul_prod, coe_mul, coe_finset_prod, mult_isReal, mult_isComplex,
pow_one, ENNReal.coe_pow, ofReal_coe_nnreal, mul_assoc]
end convexBodyLT'
section convexBodySum
open ENNReal MeasureTheory Fintype
open scoped Real NNReal
variable [NumberField K] (B : ℝ)
variable {K}
/-- The function that sends `x : mixedSpace K` to `∑ w, ‖x.1 w‖ + 2 * ∑ w, ‖x.2 w‖`. It defines a
norm and it used to define `convexBodySum`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodySumFun (x : mixedSpace K) : ℝ := ∑ w, mult w * normAtPlace w x
theorem convexBodySumFun_apply (x : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun x = ∑ w, mult w * normAtPlace w x := rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem convexBodySumFun_apply' (x : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun x = ∑ w, ‖x.1 w‖ + 2 * ∑ w, ‖x.2 w‖ := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun_apply, sum_eq_sum_add_sum, mult_isReal, mult_isComplex,
Nat.cast_one, one_mul, Nat.cast_ofNat, normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal (Subtype.prop _),
normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex (Subtype.prop _), Finset.mul_sum]
theorem convexBodySumFun_nonneg (x : mixedSpace K) :
0 ≤ convexBodySumFun x :=
Finset.sum_nonneg (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _))
theorem convexBodySumFun_neg (x : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun (- x) = convexBodySumFun x := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_neg]
theorem convexBodySumFun_add_le (x y : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun (x + y) ≤ convexBodySumFun x + convexBodySumFun y := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← mul_add]
exact Finset.sum_le_sum
fun _ _ ↦ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (normAtPlace_add_le _ x y) (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le
theorem convexBodySumFun_smul (c : ℝ) (x : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun (c • x) = |c| * convexBodySumFun x := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_smul, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
theorem convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff (x : mixedSpace K) :
convexBodySumFun x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← forall_normAtPlace_eq_zero_iff, convexBodySumFun, Finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
fun _ _ ↦ mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _)]
conv =>
enter [1, w, hw]
rw [mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr mult_ne_zero)]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_univ, true_implies]
open scoped Classical in
theorem norm_le_convexBodySumFun (x : mixedSpace K) : ‖x‖ ≤ convexBodySumFun x := by
rw [norm_eq_sup'_normAtPlace]
refine (Finset.sup'_le_iff _ _).mpr fun w _ ↦ ?_
rw [convexBodySumFun_apply, ← Finset.univ.add_sum_erase _ (Finset.mem_univ w)]
refine le_add_of_le_of_nonneg ?_ ?_
· exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (normAtPlace_nonneg w x) one_le_mult
· exact Finset.sum_nonneg (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_pos.mpr mult_pos).le
(normAtPlace_nonneg _ _))
variable (K)
theorem convexBodySumFun_continuous :
Continuous (convexBodySumFun : mixedSpace K → ℝ) := by
refine continuous_finset_sum Finset.univ fun w ↦ ?_
obtain hw | hw := isReal_or_isComplex w
all_goals
· simp only [normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal, normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex, hw]
fun_prop
/-- The convex body equal to the set of points `x : mixedSpace K` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`. -/
abbrev convexBodySum : Set (mixedSpace K) := { x | convexBodySumFun x ≤ B }
open scoped Classical in
theorem convexBodySum_volume_eq_zero_of_le_zero {B} (hB : B ≤ 0) :
volume (convexBodySum K B) = 0 := by
obtain hB | hB := lt_or_eq_of_le hB
· suffices convexBodySum K B = ∅ by rw [this, measure_empty]
ext x
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun h => h.elim⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at hx
linarith [convexBodySumFun_nonneg x]
· suffices convexBodySum K B = { 0 } by rw [this, measure_singleton]
ext
rw [convexBodySum, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_singleton_iff, hB, ← convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff]
exact (convexBodySumFun_nonneg _).le_iff_eq
theorem convexBodySum_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodySum K B) ↔
∑ w : InfinitePlace K, (mult w) * w.val x ≤ B := by
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, convexBodySumFun, normAtPlace_apply]
rfl
theorem convexBodySum_neg_mem {x : mixedSpace K} (hx : x ∈ (convexBodySum K B)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodySum K B) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf, convexBodySumFun_neg]
exact hx
theorem convexBodySum_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodySum K B) := by
refine Convex_subadditive_le (fun _ _ => convexBodySumFun_add_le _ _) (fun c x h => ?_) B
convert le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul c x)
exact (abs_eq_self.mpr h).symm
theorem convexBodySum_isBounded : Bornology.IsBounded (convexBodySum K B) := by
classical
refine Metric.isBounded_iff.mpr ⟨B + B, fun x hx y hy => ?_⟩
refine le_trans (norm_sub_le x y) (add_le_add ?_ ?_)
· exact le_trans (norm_le_convexBodySumFun x) hx
· exact le_trans (norm_le_convexBodySumFun y) hy
theorem convexBodySum_compact : IsCompact (convexBodySum K B) := by
classical
rw [Metric.isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded]
refine ⟨?_, convexBodySum_isBounded K B⟩
convert IsClosed.preimage (convexBodySumFun_continuous K) (isClosed_Icc : IsClosed (Set.Icc 0 B))
ext
simp [convexBodySumFun_nonneg]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLt`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodySumFactor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K * (NNReal.pi / 2) ^ nrComplexPlaces K / (finrank ℚ K).factorial
theorem convexBodySumFactor_ne_zero : convexBodySumFactor K ≠ 0 := by
refine div_ne_zero ?_ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)
exact mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero)
(pow_ne_zero _ (div_ne_zero NNReal.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero))
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Real in
open scoped Classical in
theorem convexBodySum_volume :
volume (convexBodySum K B) = (convexBodySumFactor K) * (.ofReal B) ^ (finrank ℚ K) := by
obtain hB | hB := le_or_lt B 0
· rw [convexBodySum_volume_eq_zero_of_le_zero K hB, ofReal_eq_zero.mpr hB, zero_pow, mul_zero]
exact finrank_pos.ne'
· suffices volume (convexBodySum K 1) = (convexBodySumFactor K) by
rw [mul_comm]
convert addHaar_smul volume B (convexBodySum K 1)
· simp_rw [← Set.preimage_smul_inv₀ (ne_of_gt hB), Set.preimage_setOf_eq, convexBodySumFun,
normAtPlace_smul, abs_inv, abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt hB), ← mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc,
← Finset.mul_sum, inv_mul_le_iff₀ hB, mul_one]
· rw [abs_pow, ofReal_pow (abs_nonneg _), abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt hB),
mixedEmbedding.finrank]
· exact this.symm
rw [MeasureTheory.measure_le_eq_lt _ ((convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff 0).mpr rfl)
convexBodySumFun_neg convexBodySumFun_add_le
(fun hx => (convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff _).mp hx)
(fun r x => le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul r x))]
rw [measure_lt_one_eq_integral_div_gamma (g := fun x : (mixedSpace K) => convexBodySumFun x)
volume ((convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff 0).mpr rfl) convexBodySumFun_neg convexBodySumFun_add_le
(fun hx => (convexBodySumFun_eq_zero_iff _).mp hx)
(fun r x => le_of_eq (convexBodySumFun_smul r x)) zero_lt_one]
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.finrank, div_one, Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ofReal_div_of_pos
(Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.factorial_pos _)), Real.rpow_one, ofReal_natCast]
suffices ∫ x : mixedSpace K, exp (-convexBodySumFun x) =
| (2 : ℝ) ^ nrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ nrComplexPlaces K by
rw [this, convexBodySumFactor, ofReal_mul (by positivity), ofReal_pow zero_le_two,
ofReal_pow (by positivity), ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, ofReal_ofNat,
← NNReal.coe_real_pi, ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_div (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr
(Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)), coe_mul, coe_pow, coe_pow, coe_ofNat, coe_div two_ne_zero,
coe_ofNat, coe_natCast]
calc
_ = (∫ x : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ, ∏ w, exp (- ‖x w‖)) *
(∫ x : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ, ∏ w, exp (- 2 * ‖x w‖)) := by
simp_rw [convexBodySumFun_apply', neg_add, ← neg_mul, Finset.mul_sum,
← Finset.sum_neg_distrib, exp_add, exp_sum, ← integral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
_ = (∫ x : ℝ, exp (-|x|)) ^ nrRealPlaces K *
(∫ x : ℂ, Real.exp (-2 * ‖x‖)) ^ nrComplexPlaces K := by
rw [integral_fintype_prod_eq_pow _ (fun x => exp (- ‖x‖)), integral_fintype_prod_eq_pow _
(fun x => exp (- 2 * ‖x‖))]
simp_rw [norm_eq_abs]
_ = (2 * Gamma (1 / 1 + 1)) ^ nrRealPlaces K *
(π * (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(2 : ℝ) / 1) * Gamma (2 / 1 + 1)) ^ nrComplexPlaces K := by
rw [integral_comp_abs (f := fun x => exp (- x)), ← integral_exp_neg_rpow zero_lt_one,
← Complex.integral_exp_neg_mul_rpow le_rfl zero_lt_two]
simp_rw [Real.rpow_one]
_ = (2 : ℝ) ^ nrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ nrComplexPlaces K := by
simp_rw [div_one, one_add_one_eq_two, Gamma_add_one two_ne_zero, Gamma_two, mul_one,
mul_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add_one two_ne_zero, show (-2 : ℝ) + 1 = -1 by norm_num,
Real.rpow_neg_one, div_eq_mul_inv]
end convexBodySum
section minkowski
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Module ZSpan Real Submodule
open scoped ENNReal NNReal nonZeroDivisors IntermediateField
variable [NumberField K] (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The bound that appears in **Minkowski Convex Body theorem**, see
`MeasureTheory.exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure`. See
`NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_idealLatticeBasis_eq` and
`NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis` for the computation of
`volume (fundamentalDomain (idealLatticeBasis K))`. -/
noncomputable def minkowskiBound : ℝ≥0∞ :=
volume (fundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) *
(2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (finrank ℝ (mixedSpace K))
open scoped Classical in
theorem volume_fundamentalDomain_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I)) =
.ofReal (FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1) * volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) := by
let e : (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I) ≃ (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/ConvexBody.lean | 401 | 451 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ExtensiveTopology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.SheafComparison
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LocallySurjective
/-!
# Locally surjective morphisms of coherent sheaves
This file characterises locally surjective morphisms of presheaves for the coherent, regular
and extensive topologies.
## Main results
* `regularTopology.isLocallySurjective_iff` A morphism of presheaves `f : F ⟶ G` is locally
surjective for the regular topology iff for every object `X` of `C`, and every `y : G(X)`, there
is an effective epimorphism `φ : X' ⟶ X` and an `x : F(X)` such that `f_{X'}(x) = G(φ)(y)`.
* `coherentTopology.isLocallySurjective_iff` a morphism of sheaves for the coherent topology on a
preregular finitary extensive category is locally surjective if and only if it is
locally surjective for the regular topology.
* `extensiveTopology.isLocallySurjective_iff` a morphism of sheaves for the extensive topology on a
finitary extensive category is locally surjective iff it is objectwise surjective.
-/
universe w
open CategoryTheory Sheaf Limits Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type*} (D : Type*) [Category C] [Category D] {FD : D → D → Type*} {CD : D → Type w}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (CD X) (CD Y)] [ConcreteCategory.{w} D FD]
lemma regularTopology.isLocallySurjective_iff [Preregular C] {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (f : F ⟶ G) :
| Presheaf.IsLocallySurjective (regularTopology C) f ↔
∀ (X : C) (y : ToType (G.obj ⟨X⟩)), (∃ (X' : C) (φ : X' ⟶ X) (_ : EffectiveEpi φ)
(x : ToType (F.obj ⟨X'⟩)),
f.app ⟨X'⟩ x = G.map ⟨φ⟩ y) := by
constructor
· intro ⟨h⟩ X y
specialize h y
rw [regularTopology.mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi] at h
obtain ⟨X', π, h, h'⟩ := h
exact ⟨X', π, h, h'⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨fun y ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨X', π, h, h'⟩ := h _ y
rw [regularTopology.mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi]
exact ⟨X', π, h, h'⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/LocallySurjective.lean | 40 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.InjSurj
/-!
# Pulling back rings along injective maps, and pushing them forward along surjective maps
-/
variable {R S : Type*}
namespace Function.Injective
variable (f : S → R) (hf : Injective f)
include hf
variable [Add S] [Mul S]
/-- Pullback a `LeftDistribClass` instance along an injective function. -/
theorem leftDistribClass [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : LeftDistribClass S where
left_distrib x y z := hf <| by simp only [*, left_distrib]
/-- Pullback a `RightDistribClass` instance along an injective function. -/
theorem rightDistribClass [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : RightDistribClass S where
right_distrib x y z := hf <| by simp only [*, right_distrib]
variable [Zero S] [One S] [Neg S] [Sub S] [SMul ℕ S] [SMul ℤ S]
[Pow S ℕ] [NatCast S] [IntCast S]
/-- Pullback a `Distrib` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev distrib [Distrib R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : Distrib S where
__ := hf.leftDistribClass f add mul
__ := hf.rightDistribClass f add mul
/-- A type endowed with `-` and `*` has distributive negation, if it admits an injective map that
preserves `-` and `*` to a type which has distributive negation. -/
-- -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev hasDistribNeg (f : S → R) (hf : Injective f) [Mul R] [HasDistribNeg R]
(neg : ∀ a, f (-a) = -f a)
(mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : HasDistribNeg S :=
{ hf.involutiveNeg _ neg, ‹Mul S› with
neg_mul := fun x y => hf <| by rw [neg, mul, neg, neg_mul, mul],
mul_neg := fun x y => hf <| by rw [neg, mul, neg, mul_neg, mul] }
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (zero : f 0 = 0)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S where
toAddCommMonoid := hf.addCommMonoid f zero add (swap nsmul)
__ := hf.distrib f add mul
__ := hf.mulZeroClass f zero mul
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalSemiring [NonUnitalSemiring R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) :
NonUnitalSemiring S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
__ := hf.semigroupWithZero f zero mul
/-- Pullback a `NonAssocSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonAssocSemiring [NonAssocSemiring R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) : NonAssocSemiring S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
__ := hf.mulZeroOneClass f zero one mul
__ := hf.addMonoidWithOne f zero one add nsmul natCast
/-- Pullback a `Semiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev semiring [Semiring R] (zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1)
(add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) (npow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) : Semiring S where
toNonUnitalSemiring := hf.nonUnitalSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
__ := hf.nonAssocSemiring f zero one add mul nsmul natCast
__ := hf.monoidWithZero f zero one mul npow
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalNonAssocRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalNonAssocRing [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] (f : S → R)
(hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x)
(sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing S where
toAddCommGroup := hf.addCommGroup f zero add neg sub (swap nsmul) (swap zsmul)
__ := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalRing [NonUnitalRing R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) :
NonUnitalRing S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocRing f zero add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul
__ := hf.nonUnitalSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
/-- Pullback a `NonAssocRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonAssocRing [NonAssocRing R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x)
(sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) (natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n)
(intCast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) : NonAssocRing S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocRing f zero add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul
__ := hf.nonAssocSemiring f zero one add mul nsmul natCast
__ := hf.addCommGroupWithOne f zero one add neg sub nsmul zsmul natCast intCast
/-- Pullback a `Ring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev ring [Ring R] (zero : f 0 = 0)
(one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n)
(intCast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) : Ring S where
toSemiring := hf.semiring f zero one add mul nsmul npow natCast
__ := hf.addGroupWithOne f zero one add neg sub nsmul zsmul natCast intCast
__ := hf.addCommGroup f zero add neg sub (swap nsmul) (swap zsmul)
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring [NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) :
NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
__ := hf.commMagma f mul
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalCommSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalCommSemiring [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] (f : S → R)
(hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) :
NonUnitalCommSemiring S where
toNonUnitalSemiring := hf.nonUnitalSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
__ := hf.commSemigroup f mul
-- `NonAssocCommSemiring` currently doesn't exist
/-- Pullback a `CommSemiring` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev commSemiring [CommSemiring R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(npow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) (natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) :
CommSemiring S where
toSemiring := hf.semiring f zero one add mul nsmul npow natCast
__ := hf.commSemigroup f mul
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalNonAssocCommRing [NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R] (f : S → R)
(hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x)
(sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) : NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing S where
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocRing f zero add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul
__ := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring f zero add mul nsmul
/-- Pullback a `NonUnitalCommRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev nonUnitalCommRing [NonUnitalCommRing R] (f : S → R)
(hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x)
(sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) : NonUnitalCommRing S where
toNonUnitalRing := hf.nonUnitalRing f zero add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul
__ := hf.nonUnitalNonAssocCommRing f zero add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul
/-- Pullback a `CommRing` instance along an injective function. -/
-- -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev commRing [CommRing R]
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (neg : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x)
(sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(zsmul : ∀ (n : ℤ) (x), f (n • x) = n • f x) (npow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) (intCast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) : CommRing S where
toRing := hf.ring f zero one add mul neg sub nsmul zsmul npow natCast intCast
__ := hf.commMonoid f one mul npow
end Function.Injective
namespace Function.Surjective
variable (f : R → S) (hf : Surjective f)
include hf
variable [Add S] [Mul S]
/-- Pushforward a `LeftDistribClass` instance along a surjective function. -/
theorem leftDistribClass [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : LeftDistribClass S where
left_distrib := hf.forall₃.2 fun x y z => by simp only [← add, ← mul, left_distrib]
/-- Pushforward a `RightDistribClass` instance along a surjective function. -/
theorem rightDistribClass [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : RightDistribClass S where
right_distrib := hf.forall₃.2 fun x y z => by simp only [← add, ← mul, right_distrib]
/-- Pushforward a `Distrib` instance along a surjective function. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected abbrev distrib [Distrib R] (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
| (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : Distrib S where
__ := hf.leftDistribClass f add mul
__ := hf.rightDistribClass f add mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/InjSurj.lean | 216 | 218 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Separably Closed Field
In this file we define the typeclass for separably closed fields and separable closures,
and prove some of their properties.
## Main Definitions
- `IsSepClosed k` is the typeclass saying `k` is a separably closed field, i.e. every separable
polynomial in `k` splits.
- `IsSepClosure k K` is the typeclass saying `K` is a separable closure of `k`, where `k` is a
field. This means that `K` is separably closed and separable over `k`.
- `IsSepClosed.lift` is a map from a separable extension `L` of `K`, into any separably
closed extension `M` of `K`.
- `IsSepClosure.equiv` is a proof that any two separable closures of the
same field are isomorphic.
- `IsSepClosure.isAlgClosure_of_perfectField`, `IsSepClosure.of_isAlgClosure_of_perfectField`:
if `k` is a perfect field, then its separable closure coincides with its algebraic closure.
## Tags
separable closure, separably closed
## Related
- `separableClosure`: maximal separable subextension of `K/k`, consisting of all elements of `K`
which are separable over `k`.
- `separableClosure.isSepClosure`: if `K` is a separably closed field containing `k`, then the
maximal separable subextension of `K/k` is a separable closure of `k`.
- In particular, a separable closure (`SeparableClosure`) exists.
- `Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isPurelyInseparable_of_isSepClosed`: an algebraic extension of a separably
closed field is purely inseparable.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
variable (k : Type u) [Field k] (K : Type v) [Field K]
/-- Typeclass for separably closed fields.
To show `Polynomial.Splits p f` for an arbitrary ring homomorphism `f`,
see `IsSepClosed.splits_codomain` and `IsSepClosed.splits_domain`.
-/
class IsSepClosed : Prop where
splits_of_separable : ∀ p : k[X], p.Separable → (p.Splits <| RingHom.id k)
/-- An algebraically closed field is also separably closed. -/
instance IsSepClosed.of_isAlgClosed [IsAlgClosed k] : IsSepClosed k :=
⟨fun p _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits p⟩
variable {k} {K}
/-- Every separable polynomial splits in the field extension `f : k →+* K` if `K` is
separably closed.
See also `IsSepClosed.splits_domain` for the case where `k` is separably closed.
-/
theorem IsSepClosed.splits_codomain [IsSepClosed K] {f : k →+* K}
(p : k[X]) (h : p.Separable) : p.Splits f := by
convert IsSepClosed.splits_of_separable (p.map f) (Separable.map h); simp [splits_map_iff]
/-- Every separable polynomial splits in the field extension `f : k →+* K` if `k` is
separably closed.
See also `IsSepClosed.splits_codomain` for the case where `k` is separably closed.
-/
theorem IsSepClosed.splits_domain [IsSepClosed k] {f : k →+* K}
(p : k[X]) (h : p.Separable) : p.Splits f :=
Polynomial.splits_of_splits_id _ <| IsSepClosed.splits_of_separable _ h
namespace IsSepClosed
theorem exists_root [IsSepClosed k] (p : k[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) (hsep : p.Separable) :
∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
exists_root_of_splits _ (IsSepClosed.splits_of_separable p hsep) hp
/-- If `n ≥ 2` equals zero in a separably closed field `k`, `b ≠ 0`,
then there exists `x` in `k` such that `a * x ^ n + b * x + c = 0`. -/
theorem exists_root_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C
[IsSepClosed k] {n : ℕ} (a b c : k) (hn : (n : k) = 0) (hn' : 2 ≤ n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ x, a * x ^ n + b * x + c = 0 := by
let f : k[X] := C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c
have hdeg : f.degree ≠ 0 := degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne <| by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· suffices f.natDegree = 1 from this ▸ one_ne_zero
simp_rw [f, ha, map_zero, zero_mul, zero_add]
compute_degree!
· suffices f.natDegree = n from this ▸ (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_two hn').ne'
simp_rw [f]
have h0 : n ≠ 0 := by linarith only [hn']
have h1 : n ≠ 1 := by linarith only [hn']
have : 1 ≤ n := le_trans one_le_two hn'
compute_degree!
simp [h0, h1, ha]
have hsep : f.Separable := separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C a b c hn hb.isUnit
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root f hdeg hsep
exact ⟨x, by simpa [f] using hx⟩
/-- If a separably closed field `k` is of characteristic `p`, `n ≥ 2` is such that `p ∣ n`, `b ≠ 0`,
then there exists `x` in `k` such that `a * x ^ n + b * x + c = 0`. -/
theorem exists_root_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C'
[IsSepClosed k] (p n : ℕ) (a b c : k) [CharP k p] (hn : p ∣ n) (hn' : 2 ≤ n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ x, a * x ^ n + b * x + c = 0 :=
exists_root_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C a b c ((CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff k p n).2 hn) hn' hb
variable (k) in
/-- A separably closed perfect field is also algebraically closed. -/
instance (priority := 100) isAlgClosed_of_perfectField [IsSepClosed k] [PerfectField k] :
IsAlgClosed k :=
IsAlgClosed.of_exists_root k fun p _ h ↦ exists_root p ((degree_pos_of_irreducible h).ne')
(PerfectField.separable_of_irreducible h)
theorem exists_pow_nat_eq [IsSepClosed k] (x : k) (n : ℕ) [hn : NeZero (n : k)] :
∃ z, z ^ n = x := by
have hn' : 0 < n := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => by
rw [h, Nat.cast_zero] at hn
exact hn.out rfl
have : degree (X ^ n - C x) ≠ 0 := by
rw [degree_X_pow_sub_C hn' x]
exact (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 hn').ne'
by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact ⟨0, by rw [hx, pow_eq_zero_iff hn'.ne']⟩
· obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := exists_root _ this <| separable_X_pow_sub_C x hn.out hx
use z
simpa [eval_C, eval_X, eval_pow, eval_sub, IsRoot.def, sub_eq_zero] using hz
theorem exists_eq_mul_self [IsSepClosed k] (x : k) [h2 : NeZero (2 : k)] : ∃ z, x = z * z := by
rcases exists_pow_nat_eq x 2 with ⟨z, rfl⟩
| exact ⟨z, sq z⟩
theorem roots_eq_zero_iff [IsSepClosed k] {p : k[X]} (hsep : p.Separable) :
p.roots = 0 ↔ p = Polynomial.C (p.coeff 0) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hp => by rw [hp, roots_C]⟩
rcases le_or_lt (degree p) 0 with hd | hd
· exact eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hd
· obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsSepClosed.exists_root p hd.ne' hsep
rw [← mem_roots (ne_zero_of_degree_gt hd), h] at hz
simp at hz
theorem exists_eval₂_eq_zero [IsSepClosed K] (f : k →+* K)
(p : k[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) (hsep : p.Separable) :
∃ x, p.eval₂ f x = 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root (p.map f) (by rwa [degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective])
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsSepClosed.lean | 146 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
theorem measure_eq_iInf' (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = ⨅ t : { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t }, μ t := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_and, ← measure_eq_iInf]
theorem measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ s = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
theorem toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ.toOuterMeasure = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
theorem measure_eq_extend (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ s = extend (fun t (_ht : MeasurableSet t) => μ t) s := by
rw [extend_eq]
exact hs
theorem nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
theorem measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ∞) : μ s₂ = ∞ :=
top_unique <| h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_left : μ s ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_left
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_right : μ t ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_right
/-- For every set there exists a measurable superset of the same measure. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using μ.toOuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim s
/-- For every set `s` and a countable collection of measures `μ i` there exists a measurable
superset `t ⊇ s` such that each measure `μ i` takes the same value on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ ∀ i, μ i t = μ i s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using
OuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset₂ (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s ∧ ν t = ν s := by
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool.trans and_comm] using
exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq (fun b => cond b μ ν) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_of_null (h : μ s = 0) : ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
h ▸ exists_measurable_superset μ s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero :
(∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_t, hst, _, ht⟩ => measure_mono_null hst ht, exists_measurable_superset_of_null⟩
theorem measure_biUnion_lt_top {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Finite)
(hfin : ∀ i ∈ s, μ (f i) < ∞) : μ (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) < ∞ := by
convert (measure_biUnion_finset_le (μ := μ) hs.toFinset f).trans_lt _ using 3
· ext
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset]
· simpa only [ENNReal.sum_lt_top, Finite.mem_toFinset]
theorem measure_union_lt_top (hs : μ s < ∞) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ :=
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hs, ht⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_lt_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ ↔ μ s < ∞ ∧ μ t < ∞ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => measure_union_lt_top h.1 h.2⟩
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_left).trans_lt h
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_right).trans_lt h
theorem measure_union_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_union_lt_top hs.lt_top ht.lt_top).ne
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem measure_symmDiff_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top (measure_union_ne_top hs ht) <| measure_mono symmDiff_subset_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_eq_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = ∞ ↔ μ s = ∞ ∨ μ t = ∞ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simp only [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ← Ne.eq_def, not_or, measure_union_lt_top_iff]
theorem exists_measure_pos_of_not_measure_iUnion_null [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : μ (⋃ n, s n) ≠ 0) : ∃ n, 0 < μ (s n) := by
contrapose! hs
exact measure_iUnion_null fun n => nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (hs n)
theorem measure_lt_top_of_subset (hst : t ⊆ s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono hst) hs.lt_top
theorem measure_ne_top_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_lt_top_of_subset h ht).ne
theorem measure_inter_lt_top_of_left_ne_top (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ :=
measure_lt_top_of_subset inter_subset_left hs_finite
theorem measure_inter_lt_top_of_right_ne_top (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ :=
measure_lt_top_of_subset inter_subset_right ht_finite
theorem measure_inter_null_of_null_right (S : Set α) {T : Set α} (h : μ T = 0) : μ (S ∩ T) = 0 :=
measure_mono_null inter_subset_right h
theorem measure_inter_null_of_null_left {S : Set α} (T : Set α) (h : μ S = 0) : μ (S ∩ T) = 0 :=
measure_mono_null inter_subset_left h
/-! ### The almost everywhere filter -/
section ae
| /-- Given a predicate on `β` and `Set α` where both `α` and `β` are measurable spaces, if the
predicate holds for almost every `x : β` and
- `∅ : Set α`
- a family of sets generating the σ-algebra of `α`
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 273 | 276 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Units
/-!
# Ordered monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines morphisms between (additive) ordered monoids.
## Types of morphisms
* `OrderAddMonoidHom`: Ordered additive monoid homomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidHom`: Ordered monoid homomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`: Ordered monoid with zero homomorphisms.
* `OrderAddMonoidIso`: Ordered additive monoid isomorphisms.
* `OrderMonoidIso`: Ordered monoid isomorphisms.
## Notation
* `→+o`: Bundled ordered additive monoid homs. Also use for additive group homs.
* `→*o`: Bundled ordered monoid homs. Also use for group homs.
* `→*₀o`: Bundled ordered monoid with zero homs. Also use for group with zero homs.
* `≃+o`: Bundled ordered additive monoid isos. Also use for additive group isos.
* `≃*o`: Bundled ordered monoid isos. Also use for group isos.
* `≃*₀o`: Bundled ordered monoid with zero isos. Also use for group with zero isos.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical notation is to use the bundled hom as
a function via this coercion.
There is no `OrderGroupHom` -- the idea is that `OrderMonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `OrderMonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well as `map_mul`; a separate
constructor `OrderMonoidHom.mk'` will construct ordered group homs (i.e. ordered monoid homs
between ordered groups) given only a proof that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `OrderMonoidHom`. When
they can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
### Removed typeclasses
This file used to define typeclasses for order-preserving (additive) monoid homomorphisms:
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass`, `OrderMonoidHomClass`, and `OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass`.
In https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10544 we migrated from these typeclasses
to assumptions like `[FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N]`,
making some definitions and lemmas irrelevant.
## Tags
ordered monoid, ordered group, monoid with zero
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
section AddMonoid
/-- `α →+o β` is the type of monotone functions `α → β` that preserve the `OrderedAddCommMonoid`
structure.
`OrderAddMonoidHom` is also used for ordered group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →+o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderAddMonoidHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α]
[AddZeroClass β] extends α →+ β where
/-- An `OrderAddMonoidHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderAddMonoidHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →+o " => OrderAddMonoidHom
/-- `α ≃+o β` is the type of monotone isomorphisms `α ≃ β` that preserve the `OrderedAddCommMonoid`
structure.
`OrderAddMonoidIso` is also used for ordered group isomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α ≃+o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [AddEquivClass F M N] [OrderIsoClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderAddMonoidIso (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Add α] [Add β]
extends α ≃+ β where
/-- An `OrderAddMonoidIso` respects `≤`. -/
map_le_map_iff' {a b : α} : toFun a ≤ toFun b ↔ a ≤ b
/-- Infix notation for `OrderAddMonoidIso`. -/
infixr:25 " ≃+o " => OrderAddMonoidIso
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end AddMonoid
section Monoid
/-- `α →*o β` is the type of functions `α → β` that preserve the `OrderedCommMonoid` structure.
`OrderMonoidHom` is also used for ordered group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →*o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure OrderMonoidHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α]
[MulOneClass β] extends α →* β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →*o " => OrderMonoidHom
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `MonoidHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →*o β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `AddMonoidHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderAddMonoidHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →+o β`."]
def OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
α →*o β :=
{ (f : α →* β) with monotone' := OrderHomClass.monotone f }
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidHom` via
`OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidHom` via
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass.toOrderAddMonoidHom`"]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom⟩
/-- `α ≃*o β` is the type of isomorphisms `α ≃ β` that preserve the `OrderedCommMonoid` structure.
`OrderMonoidIso` is also used for ordered group isomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α ≃*o β)`,
you should parametrize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] [OrderIsoClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure OrderMonoidIso (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Mul α] [Mul β]
extends α ≃* β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidIso` respects `≤`. -/
map_le_map_iff' {a b : α} : toFun a ≤ toFun b ↔ a ≤ b
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidIso`. -/
infixr:25 " ≃*o " => OrderMonoidIso
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderIsoClass F α β` and `MulEquivClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidIso`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃*o β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderIsoClass F α β` and `AddEquivClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderAddMonoidIso`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃+o β`."]
def OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
[MulEquivClass F α β] (f : F) :
α ≃*o β :=
{ (f : α ≃* β) with map_le_map_iff' := OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f }
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidHom` via
`OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidHom` via
`OrderAddMonoidHomClass.toOrderAddMonoidHom`"]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidHomClass.toOrderMonoidHom⟩
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderMonoidIsoClass` can be cast into `OrderMonoidIso` via
`OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `OrderAddMonoidIsoClass` can be cast into `OrderAddMonoidIso` via
`OrderAddMonoidIsoClass.toOrderAddMonoidIso`"]
instance [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃*o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidIsoClass.toOrderMonoidIso⟩
end Monoid
section MonoidWithZero
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulZeroOneClass α] [MulZeroOneClass β]
/-- `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom α β` is the type of functions `α → β` that preserve
the `MonoidWithZero` structure.
`OrderMonoidWithZeroHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : α →+ β)`,
you should parameterize over
`(F : Type*) [FunLike F M N] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F M N] [OrderHomClass F M N] (f : F)`. -/
structure OrderMonoidWithZeroHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulZeroOneClass α]
[MulZeroOneClass β] extends α →*₀ β where
/-- An `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom` is a monotone function. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Infix notation for `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →*₀o " => OrderMonoidWithZeroHom
section
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F`
satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` and `MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β`
into an actual `OrderMonoidWithZeroHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →+*₀o β`. -/
@[coe]
def OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass.toOrderMonoidWithZeroHom [OrderHomClass F α β]
[MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] (f : F) : α →*₀o β :=
{ (f : α →*₀ β) with monotone' := OrderHomClass.monotone f }
end
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance [OrderHomClass F α β] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α →*₀o β) :=
⟨OrderMonoidWithZeroHomClass.toOrderMonoidWithZeroHom⟩
end MonoidWithZero
section OrderedZero
variable [FunLike F α β]
variable [Preorder α] [Zero α] [Preorder β] [Zero β] [OrderHomClass F α β]
[ZeroHomClass F α β] (f : F) {a : α}
/-- See also `NonnegHomClass.apply_nonneg`. -/
theorem map_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ f a := by
rw [← map_zero f]
exact OrderHomClass.mono _ ha
theorem map_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : f a ≤ 0 := by
rw [← map_zero f]
exact OrderHomClass.mono _ ha
end OrderedZero
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
[AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [i : FunLike F α β]
variable (f : F)
theorem monotone_iff_map_nonneg [iamhc : AddMonoidHomClass F α β] :
Monotone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ f a :=
⟨fun h a => by
rw [← map_zero f]
apply h, fun h a b hl => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel b a, map_add f]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (h _ <| sub_nonneg.2 hl)⟩
variable [iamhc : AddMonoidHomClass F α β]
theorem antitone_iff_map_nonpos : Antitone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 ≤ a → f a ≤ 0 :=
monotone_toDual_comp_iff.symm.trans <| monotone_iff_map_nonneg (β := βᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem monotone_iff_map_nonpos : Monotone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a ≤ 0, f a ≤ 0 :=
antitone_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| antitone_iff_map_nonpos (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem antitone_iff_map_nonneg : Antitone (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a ≤ 0, 0 ≤ f a :=
monotone_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| monotone_iff_map_nonneg (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictMono_iff_map_pos :
StrictMono (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 < a → 0 < f a := by
refine ⟨fun h a => ?_, fun h a b hl => ?_⟩
· rw [← map_zero f]
apply h
· rw [← sub_add_cancel b a, map_add f]
exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (h _ <| sub_pos.2 hl)
theorem strictAnti_iff_map_neg : StrictAnti (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a, 0 < a → f a < 0 :=
strictMono_toDual_comp_iff.symm.trans <| strictMono_iff_map_pos (β := βᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictMono_iff_map_neg : StrictMono (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a < 0, f a < 0 :=
strictAnti_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| strictAnti_iff_map_neg (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
theorem strictAnti_iff_map_pos : StrictAnti (f : α → β) ↔ ∀ a < 0, 0 < f a :=
strictMono_comp_ofDual_iff.symm.trans <| strictMono_iff_map_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) (iamhc := iamhc) _
end OrderedAddCommGroup
namespace OrderMonoidHom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β]
[MulOneClass γ] [MulOneClass δ] {f g : α →*o β}
@[to_additive]
instance : FunLike (α →*o β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
initialize_simps_projections OrderAddMonoidHom (toFun → apply, -toAddMonoidHom)
initialize_simps_projections OrderMonoidHom (toFun → apply, -toMonoidHom)
@[to_additive]
instance : OrderHomClass (α →*o β) α β where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[to_additive]
instance : MonoidHomClass (α →*o β) α β where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
-- Other lemmas should be accessed through the `FunLike` API
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[to_additive]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : α →*o β) : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_mk (f : α →* β) (h) : (OrderMonoidHom.mk f h : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_coe (f : α →*o β) (h) : OrderMonoidHom.mk (f : α →* β) h = f := by
ext
rfl
/-- Reinterpret an ordered monoid homomorphism as an order homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Reinterpret an ordered additive monoid homomorphism as an order homomorphism."]
def toOrderHom (f : α →*o β) : α →o β :=
{ f with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_monoidHom (f : α →*o β) : ((f : α →* β) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_orderHom (f : α →*o β) : ((f : α →o β) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem toMonoidHom_injective : Injective (toMonoidHom : _ → α →* β) := fun f g h =>
ext <| by convert DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h using 0
@[to_additive]
theorem toOrderHom_injective : Injective (toOrderHom : _ → α →o β) := fun f g h =>
ext <| by convert DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h using 0
/-- Copy of an `OrderMonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
@[to_additive "Copy of an `OrderAddMonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def copy (f : α →*o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : α →*o β :=
{ f.toMonoidHom.copy f' h with toFun := f', monotone' := h.symm.subst f.monotone' }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (f : α →*o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (f : α →*o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- The identity map as an ordered monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The identity map as an ordered additive monoid homomorphism."]
protected def id : α →*o α :=
{ MonoidHom.id α, OrderHom.id with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(OrderMonoidHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (α →*o α) :=
⟨OrderMonoidHom.id α⟩
variable {α}
/-- Composition of `OrderMonoidHom`s as an `OrderMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `OrderAddMonoidHom`s as an `OrderAddMonoidHom`"]
def comp (f : β →*o γ) (g : α →*o β) : α →*o γ :=
{ f.toMonoidHom.comp (g : α →* β), f.toOrderHom.comp (g : α →o β) with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comp (f : β →*o γ) (g : α →*o β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_apply (f : β →*o γ) (g : α →*o β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_comp_monoidHom (f : β →*o γ) (g : α →*o β) :
(f.comp g : α →* γ) = (f : β →* γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_comp_orderHom (f : β →*o γ) (g : α →*o β) :
(f.comp g : α →o γ) = (f : β →o γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_assoc (f : γ →*o δ) (g : β →*o γ) (h : α →*o β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_id (f : α →*o β) : f.comp (OrderMonoidHom.id α) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem id_comp (f : α →*o β) : (OrderMonoidHom.id β).comp f = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : β →*o γ} {f : α →*o β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun _ => by congr⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem cancel_left {g : β →*o γ} {f₁ f₂ : α →*o β} (hg : Function.Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
/-- `1` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `0`."]
instance : One (α →*o β) :=
⟨{ (1 : α →* β) with monotone' := monotone_const }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : α →*o β) = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_apply (a : α) : (1 : α →*o β) a = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_comp (f : α →*o β) : (1 : β →*o γ).comp f = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_one (f : β →*o γ) : f.comp (1 : α →*o β) = 1 :=
ext fun _ => map_one f
end Preorder
section Mul
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α]
[CommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
[CommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ]
/-- For two ordered monoid morphisms `f` and `g`, their product is the ordered monoid morphism
sending `a` to `f a * g a`. -/
@[to_additive "For two ordered additive monoid morphisms `f` and `g`, their product is the ordered
additive monoid morphism sending `a` to `f a + g a`."]
instance [IsOrderedMonoid β] : Mul (α →*o β) :=
⟨fun f g => { (f * g : α →* β) with monotone' := f.monotone'.mul' g.monotone' }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_mul [IsOrderedMonoid β] (f g : α →*o β) : ⇑(f * g) = f * g :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_apply [IsOrderedMonoid β] (f g : α →*o β) (a : α) : (f * g) a = f a * g a :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comp [IsOrderedMonoid γ] (g₁ g₂ : β →*o γ) (f : α →*o β) :
(g₁ * g₂).comp f = g₁.comp f * g₂.comp f :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mul [IsOrderedMonoid β] [IsOrderedMonoid γ] (g : β →*o γ) (f₁ f₂ : α →*o β) :
g.comp (f₁ * f₂) = g.comp f₁ * g.comp f₂ :=
ext fun _ => map_mul g _ _
end Mul
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable {_ : Preorder α} {_ : Preorder β} {_ : MulOneClass α} {_ : MulOneClass β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toMonoidHom_eq_coe (f : α →*o β) : f.toMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toOrderHom_eq_coe (f : α →*o β) : f.toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
end OrderedCommMonoid
section OrderedCommGroup
variable {_ : CommGroup α} {_ : PartialOrder α} {_ : CommGroup β} {_ : PartialOrder β}
/-- Makes an ordered group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive
"Makes an ordered additive group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves
addition."]
def mk' (f : α → β) (hf : Monotone f) (map_mul : ∀ a b : α, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : α →*o β :=
{ MonoidHom.mk' f map_mul with monotone' := hf }
end OrderedCommGroup
end OrderMonoidHom
namespace OrderMonoidIso
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] [Mul α] [Mul β]
[Mul γ] [Mul δ] {f g : α ≃*o β}
@[to_additive]
instance : EquivLike (α ≃*o β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
@[to_additive]
instance : OrderIsoClass (α ≃*o β) α β where
map_le_map_iff f := f.map_le_map_iff'
@[to_additive]
instance : MulEquivClass (α ≃*o β) α β where
map_mul f := map_mul f.toMulEquiv
-- Other lemmas should be accessed through the `FunLike` API
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[to_additive]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : α ≃*o β) : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_mk (f : α ≃* β) (h) : (OrderMonoidIso.mk f h : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_coe (f : α ≃*o β) (h) : OrderMonoidIso.mk (f : α ≃* β) h = f := rfl
/-- Reinterpret an ordered monoid isomorphism as an order isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Reinterpret an ordered additive monoid isomomorphism as an order isomomorphism."]
def toOrderIso (f : α ≃*o β) : α ≃o β :=
{ f with
map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff f }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_mulEquiv (f : α ≃*o β) : ((f : α ≃* β) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_orderIso (f : α ≃*o β) : ((f : α →o β) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem toMulEquiv_injective : Injective (toMulEquiv : _ → α ≃* β) := fun f g h =>
ext <| by convert DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h using 0
@[to_additive]
theorem toOrderIso_injective : Injective (toOrderIso : _ → α ≃o β) := fun f g h =>
ext <| by convert DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h using 0
variable (α)
/-- The identity map as an ordered monoid isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The identity map as an ordered additive monoid isomorphism."]
protected def refl : α ≃*o α :=
{ MulEquiv.refl α with map_le_map_iff' := by simp }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(OrderMonoidIso.refl α) = id :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (α ≃*o α) :=
⟨OrderMonoidIso.refl α⟩
variable {α}
/-- Transitivity of multiplication-preserving order isomorphisms -/
@[to_additive (attr := trans) "Transitivity of addition-preserving order isomorphisms"]
def trans (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) : α ≃*o γ :=
{ (f : α ≃* β).trans g with map_le_map_iff' := by simp }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) : (f.trans g : α → γ) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_trans_mulEquiv (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) :
(f.trans g : α ≃* γ) = (f : α ≃* β).trans g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_trans_orderIso (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) :
(f.trans g : α ≃o γ) = (f : α ≃o β).trans g :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem trans_assoc (f : α ≃*o β) (g : β ≃*o γ) (h : γ ≃*o δ) :
(f.trans g).trans h = f.trans (g.trans h) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem trans_refl (f : α ≃*o β) : f.trans (OrderMonoidIso.refl β) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem refl_trans (f : α ≃*o β) : (OrderMonoidIso.refl α).trans f = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : α ≃*o β} {f : β ≃*o γ} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
g₁.trans f = g₂.trans f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext fun a => hf <| by rw [← trans_apply, h, trans_apply], by rintro rfl; rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem cancel_left {g : α ≃*o β} {f₁ f₂ : β ≃*o γ} (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
g.trans f₁ = g.trans f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hg.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun _ => by congr⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toMulEquiv_eq_coe (f : α ≃*o β) : f.toMulEquiv = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toOrderIso_eq_coe (f : α ≃*o β) : f.toOrderIso = f :=
rfl
/-- The inverse of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive (attr := symm) "The inverse of an order isomorphism is an order isomorphism."]
def symm (f : α ≃*o β) : β ≃*o α :=
⟨f.toMulEquiv.symm, f.toOrderIso.symm.map_rel_iff⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
@[to_additive "See Note [custom simps projection]."]
def Simps.apply (h : α ≃*o β) : α → β :=
h
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
@[to_additive "See Note [custom simps projection]."]
def Simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃*o β) : β → α :=
h.symm
| initialize_simps_projections OrderAddMonoidIso (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
initialize_simps_projections OrderMonoidIso (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Hom/Monoid.lean | 666 | 668 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
section
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom :
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (X Y : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv ≫ ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y) = X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom := by
rw [← triangle, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).hom = X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (X Y : C) :
(X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv) ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv = (ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y)]
/-- We state it as a simp lemma, which is regarded as an involved version of
`id_whiskerRight X Y : 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y)`.
-/
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).hom ▷ Y = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom ≫ (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).inv ▷ Y = (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (X ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv = (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv ≫ (λ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = (λ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv := by simp
end
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ g) ⊗ h) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem associator_conjugation {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g) ⊗ h = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv := by
rw [associator_inv_naturality, hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_conjugation {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
f ⊗ g ⊗ h = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ g) ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').hom := by
rw [associator_naturality, inv_hom_id_assoc]
-- TODO these next two lemmas aren't so fundamental, and perhaps could be removed
-- (replacing their usages by their proofs).
@[reassoc]
theorem id_tensor_associator_naturality {X Y Z Z' : C} (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (𝟙 X ⊗ 𝟙 Y ⊗ h) := by
rw [← tensor_id, associator_naturality]
@[reassoc]
theorem id_tensor_associator_inv_naturality {X Y Z X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
| (f ⊗ 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z)) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ 𝟙 Y) ⊗ 𝟙 Z) := by
rw [← tensor_id, associator_inv_naturality]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 639 | 640 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Archimedean
/-!
# Relations on types with a `SuccOrder`
This file contains properties about relations on types with a `SuccOrder`
and their closure operations (like the transitive closure).
-/
open Function Order Relation Set
section PartialSucc
variable {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] [IsSuccArchimedean α]
/-- For `n ≤ m`, `(n, m)` is in the reflexive-transitive closure of `~` if `i ~ succ i`
for all `i` between `n` and `m`. -/
theorem reflTransGen_of_succ_of_le (r : α → α → Prop) {n m : α} (h : ∀ i ∈ Ico n m, r i (succ i))
(hnm : n ≤ m) : ReflTransGen r n m := by
revert h; refine Succ.rec ?_ ?_ hnm
| · intro _
exact ReflTransGen.refl
· intro m hnm ih h
have : ReflTransGen r n m := ih fun i hi => h i ⟨hi.1, hi.2.trans_le <| le_succ m⟩
rcases (le_succ m).eq_or_lt with hm | hm
· rwa [← hm]
exact this.tail (h m ⟨hnm, hm⟩)
/-- For `m ≤ n`, `(n, m)` is in the reflexive-transitive closure of `~` if `succ i ~ i`
for all `i` between `n` and `m`. -/
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Relation.lean | 26 | 35 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
/-!
# Japanese Bracket
In this file, we show that Japanese bracket $(1 + \|x\|^2)^{1/2}$ can be estimated from above
and below by $1 + \|x\|$.
The functions $(1 + \|x\|^2)^{-r/2}$ and $(1 + |x|)^{-r}$ are integrable provided that `r` is larger
than the dimension.
## Main statements
* `integrable_one_add_norm`: the function $(1 + |x|)^{-r}$ is integrable
* `integrable_jap` the Japanese bracket is integrable
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Filter Topology ENNReal
open Asymptotics Filter Set Real MeasureTheory Module
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem sqrt_one_add_norm_sq_le (x : E) : √((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ≤ 1 + ‖x‖ := by
rw [sqrt_le_left (by positivity)]
simp [add_sq]
theorem one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt (x : E) :
(1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ≤ √2 * √(1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_mul zero_le_two]
have := sq_nonneg (‖x‖ - 1)
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
linarith
theorem rpow_neg_one_add_norm_sq_le {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ^ (-r / 2) ≤ (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) :=
calc
((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ^ (-r / 2)
= (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * ((√2 * √((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2)) ^ r)⁻¹ := by
rw [rpow_div_two_eq_sqrt, rpow_div_two_eq_sqrt, mul_rpow, mul_inv, rpow_neg,
mul_inv_cancel_left₀] <;> positivity
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * ((1 + ‖x‖) ^ r)⁻¹ := by
gcongr
apply one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt
_ = (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) := by rw [rpow_neg]; positivity
theorem le_rpow_one_add_norm_iff_norm_le {r t : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ht : 0 < t) (x : E) :
t ≤ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', neg_inv]
exact (Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (by positivity) ht (neg_lt_zero.mpr hr)).symm
variable (E)
theorem closedBall_rpow_sub_one_eq_empty_aux {r t : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ht : 1 < t) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : E) (t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) = ∅ := by
rw [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty, sub_neg]
exact Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg ht (by simp only [hr, Right.neg_neg_iff, inv_pos])
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
| variable {E}
theorem finite_integral_rpow_sub_one_pow_aux {r : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (hnr : (n : ℝ) < r) :
(∫⁻ x : ℝ in Ioc 0 1, ENNReal.ofReal ((x ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) ^ n)) < ∞ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/JapaneseBracket.lean | 70 | 73 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Levenshtein distances
We define the Levenshtein edit distance `levenshtein C xy ys` between two `List α`,
with a customizable cost structure `C` for the `delete`, `insert`, and `substitute` operations.
As an auxiliary function, we define `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`, which gives the list of distances
from each suffix of `xs` to `ys`.
This is defined by recursion on `ys`, using the internal function `Levenshtein.impl`,
which computes `suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys)` using `xs`, `y`, and `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`.
(This corresponds to the usual algorithm
using the last two rows of the matrix of distances between suffixes.)
After setting up these definitions, we prove lemmas specifying their behaviour,
particularly
```
theorem suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1 = xs.tails.map fun xs' => levenshtein C xs' ys := ...
```
and
```
theorem levenshtein_cons_cons :
levenshtein C (x :: xs) (y :: ys) =
min (C.delete x + levenshtein C xs (y :: ys))
(min (C.insert y + levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys)
(C.substitute x y + levenshtein C xs ys)) := ...
```
-/
variable {α β δ : Type*} [AddZeroClass δ] [Min δ]
namespace Levenshtein
/-- A cost structure for Levenshtein edit distance. -/
structure Cost (α β δ : Type*) where
/-- Cost to delete an element from a list. -/
delete : α → δ
/-- Cost in insert an element into a list. -/
insert : β → δ
/-- Cost to substitute one element for another in a list. -/
substitute : α → β → δ
/-- The default cost structure, for which all operations cost `1`. -/
@[simps]
def defaultCost [DecidableEq α] : Cost α α ℕ where
delete _ := 1
insert _ := 1
substitute a b := if a = b then 0 else 1
instance [DecidableEq α] : Inhabited (Cost α α ℕ) := ⟨defaultCost⟩
/--
Cost structure given by a function.
Delete and insert cost the same, and substitution costs the greater value.
-/
@[simps]
def weightCost (f : α → ℕ) : Cost α α ℕ where
delete a := f a
insert b := f b
substitute a b := max (f a) (f b)
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost String.length
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the log base 2 length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLogLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost fun s => Nat.log2 (s.length + 1)
variable (C : Cost α β δ)
/--
(Implementation detail for `levenshtein`)
Given a list `xs` and the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to some other list `ys`,
compute the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to `y :: ys`.
(Note that we don't actually need to know `ys` itself here, so it is not an argument.)
The return value is a list of length `x.length + 1`,
and it is convenient for the recursive calls that we bundle this list
with a proof that it is non-empty.
-/
def impl
(xs : List α) (y : β) (d : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length}) : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length} :=
let ⟨ds, w⟩ := d
xs.zip (ds.zip ds.tail) |>.foldr
(init := ⟨[C.insert y + ds.getLast (List.length_pos_iff.mp w)], by simp⟩)
(fun ⟨x, d₀, d₁⟩ ⟨r, w⟩ =>
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d₀) (C.substitute x y + d₁)) :: r, by simp⟩)
variable {C}
variable (x : α) (xs : List α) (y : β) (d : δ) (ds : List δ) (w : 0 < (d :: ds).length)
-- Note this lemma has an unspecified proof `w'` on the right-hand-side,
| -- which will become an extra goal when rewriting.
theorem impl_cons (w' : 0 < List.length ds) :
impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩ =
let ⟨r, w⟩ := impl C xs y ⟨ds, w'⟩
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d) (C.substitute x y + ds[0])) :: r, by simp⟩ :=
| Mathlib/Data/List/EditDistance/Defs.lean | 111 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
/-!
# Iterate maps and comaps of submodules
Some preliminary work for establishing the strong rank condition for noetherian rings.
Given two linear maps `f i : N →ₗ[R] M` and a submodule `K : Submodule R N`, we can define
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i n K : Submodule R N` to be `f⁻¹(i(⋯(f⁻¹(i(K)))))` (`n` times).
If `f(K) ≤ i(K)`, then this sequence is non-decreasing (`LinearMap.iterateMapComap_le_succ`).
On the other hand, if `f` is surjective, `i` is injective, and there exists some `m` such that
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i m K = LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i (m + 1) K`,
then for any `n`,
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i n K = LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i (n + 1) K`.
In particular, by taking `n = 0`, the kernel of `f` is contained in `K`
(`LinearMap.ker_le_of_iterateMapComap_eq_succ`),
which is a consequence of `LinearMap.ker_le_comap`.
As a special case, if one can take `K` to be zero,
then `f` is injective. This is the key result for establishing the strong rank condition
for noetherian rings.
The construction here is adapted from the proof in Djoković's paper
*Epimorphisms of modules which must be isomorphisms* [djokovic1973].
-/
open Function Submodule
namespace LinearMap
variable {R N M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
[AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f i : N →ₗ[R] M)
/-- The `LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i n K : Submodule R N` is
`f⁻¹(i(⋯(f⁻¹(i(K)))))` (`n` times). -/
def iterateMapComap (n : ℕ) := (fun K : Submodule R N ↦ (K.map i).comap f)^[n]
/-- If `f(K) ≤ i(K)`, then `LinearMap.iterateMapComap` is not decreasing. -/
theorem iterateMapComap_le_succ (K : Submodule R N) (h : K.map f ≤ K.map i) (n : ℕ) :
f.iterateMapComap i n K ≤ f.iterateMapComap i (n + 1) K := by
nth_rw 2 [iterateMapComap]
rw [iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply, ← iterateMapComap, ← map_le_iff_le_comap]
induction n with
| zero => exact h
| succ n ih =>
simp_rw [iterateMapComap, iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply]
calc
_ ≤ (f.iterateMapComap i n K).map i := map_comap_le _ _
_ ≤ (((f.iterateMapComap i n K).map f).comap f).map i := map_mono (le_comap_map _ _)
_ ≤ _ := map_mono (comap_mono ih)
/-- If `f` is surjective, `i` is injective, and there exists some `m` such that
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i m K = LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i (m + 1) K`,
then for any `n`,
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i n K = LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i (n + 1) K`.
In particular, by taking `n = 0`, the kernel of `f` is contained in `K`
(`LinearMap.ker_le_of_iterateMapComap_eq_succ`),
which is a consequence of `LinearMap.ker_le_comap`. -/
theorem iterateMapComap_eq_succ (K : Submodule R N)
(m : ℕ) (heq : f.iterateMapComap i m K = f.iterateMapComap i (m + 1) K)
(hf : Surjective f) (hi : Injective i) (n : ℕ) :
f.iterateMapComap i n K = f.iterateMapComap i (n + 1) K := by
induction n with
| zero =>
contrapose! heq
induction m with
| zero => exact heq
| succ m ih =>
rw [iterateMapComap, iterateMapComap, iterate_succ', iterate_succ']
exact fun H ↦ ih (map_injective_of_injective hi (comap_injective_of_surjective hf H))
| succ n ih =>
rw [iterateMapComap, iterateMapComap, iterate_succ', iterate_succ',
Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, ← iterateMapComap, ← iterateMapComap, ih]
/-- If `f` is surjective, `i` is injective, and there exists some `m` such that
`LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i m K = LinearMap.iterateMapComap f i (m + 1) K`,
then the kernel of `f` is contained in `K`.
This is a corollary of `LinearMap.iterateMapComap_eq_succ` and `LinearMap.ker_le_comap`.
As a special case, if one can take `K` to be zero,
then `f` is injective. This is the key result for establishing the strong rank condition
for noetherian rings. -/
| theorem ker_le_of_iterateMapComap_eq_succ (K : Submodule R N)
(m : ℕ) (heq : f.iterateMapComap i m K = f.iterateMapComap i (m + 1) K)
(hf : Surjective f) (hi : Injective i) : LinearMap.ker f ≤ K := by
rw [show K = _ from f.iterateMapComap_eq_succ i K m heq hf hi 0]
exact f.ker_le_comap
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/IterateMapComap.lean | 88 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.UnitaryGroup
import Mathlib.Util.Superscript
/-!
# `L²` inner product space structure on finite products of inner product spaces
The `L²` norm on a finite product of inner product spaces is compatible with an inner product
$$
\langle x, y\rangle = \sum \langle x_i, y_i \rangle.
$$
This is recorded in this file as an inner product space instance on `PiLp 2`.
This file develops the notion of a finite dimensional Hilbert space over `𝕜 = ℂ, ℝ`, referred to as
`E`. We define an `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι E` as a linear isometric equivalence
between `E` and `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`. Then `stdOrthonormalBasis` shows that such an equivalence
always exists if `E` is finite dimensional. We provide language for converting between a basis
that is orthonormal and an orthonormal basis (e.g. `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`). We show that
orthonormal bases for each summand in a direct sum of spaces can be combined into an orthonormal
basis for the whole sum in `DirectSum.IsInternal.subordinateOrthonormalBasis`. In
the last section, various properties of matrices are explored.
## Main definitions
- `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n`: defined to be `PiLp 2 (n → 𝕜)` for any `Fintype n`, i.e., the space
from functions to `n` to `𝕜` with the `L²` norm. We register several instances on it (notably
that it is a finite-dimensional inner product space), and provide a `!ₚ[]` notation (for numeric
subscripts like `₂`) for the case when the indexing type is `Fin n`.
- `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι`: defined to be an isometry to Euclidean space from a given
finite-dimensional inner product space, `E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`.
- `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`: constructs an `OrthonormalBasis` for a finite-dimensional
Euclidean space from a `Basis` which is `Orthonormal`.
- `Orthonormal.exists_orthonormalBasis_extension`: provides an existential result of an
`OrthonormalBasis` extending a given orthonormal set
- `exists_orthonormalBasis`: provides an orthonormal basis on a finite dimensional vector space
- `stdOrthonormalBasis`: provides an arbitrarily-chosen `OrthonormalBasis` of a given finite
dimensional inner product space
For consequences in infinite dimension (Hilbert bases, etc.), see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.L2Space`.
-/
open Real Set Filter RCLike Submodule Function Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal
ComplexConjugate DirectSum
noncomputable section
variable {ι ι' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F']
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-
If `ι` is a finite type and each space `f i`, `i : ι`, is an inner product space,
then `Π i, f i` is an inner product space as well. Since `Π i, f i` is endowed with the sup norm,
we use instead `PiLp 2 f` for the product space, which is endowed with the `L^2` norm.
-/
instance PiLp.innerProductSpace {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → Type*)
[∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (PiLp 2 f) where
inner x y := ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i)
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by
simp only [PiLp.norm_sq_eq_of_L2, map_sum, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, one_div]
conj_inner_symm := by
intro x y
unfold inner
rw [map_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
rintro z -
apply inner_conj_symm
add_left x y z :=
show (∑ i, inner (x i + y i) (z i)) = (∑ i, inner (x i) (z i)) + ∑ i, inner (y i) (z i) by
simp only [inner_add_left, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
smul_left x y r :=
show (∑ i : ι, inner (r • x i) (y i)) = conj r * ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i) by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, inner_smul_left]
@[simp]
theorem PiLp.inner_apply {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)]
[∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] (x y : PiLp 2 f) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ∑ i, ⟪x i, y i⟫ :=
rfl
/-- The standard real/complex Euclidean space, functions on a finite type. For an `n`-dimensional
space use `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 (Fin n)`.
For the case when `n = Fin _`, there is `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation for building elements of this type,
analogous to `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (n : Type*) : Type _ :=
PiLp 2 fun _ : n => 𝕜
section Notation
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Mathlib.Tactic (subscriptTerm)
/-- Notation for vectors in Lp space. `!₂[x, y, ...]` is a shorthand for
`(WithLp.equiv 2 _ _).symm ![x, y, ...]`, of type `EuclideanSpace _ (Fin _)`.
This also works for other subscripts. -/
syntax (name := PiLp.vecNotation) "!" noWs subscriptTerm noWs "[" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules | `(!$p:subscript[$e:term,*]) => do
-- override the `Fin n.succ` to a literal
let n := e.getElems.size
`((WithLp.equiv $p <| ∀ _ : Fin $(quote n), _).symm ![$e,*])
/-- Unexpander for the `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def EuclideanSpace.delabVecNotation : Delab :=
whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 6 do
-- check that the `(WithLp.equiv _ _).symm` is present
let p : Term ← withAppFn <| withAppArg do
let_expr Equiv.symm _ _ e := ← getExpr | failure
let_expr WithLp.equiv _ _ := e | failure
withNaryArg 2 <| withNaryArg 0 <| delab
-- to be conservative, only allow subscripts which are numerals
guard <| p matches `($_:num)
let `(![$elems,*]) := ← withAppArg delab | failure
`(!$p[$elems,*])
|
end Notation
theorem EuclideanSpace.nnnorm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : ‖x‖₊ = NNReal.sqrt (∑ i, ‖x i‖₊ ^ 2) :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/PiL2.lean | 134 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.CoreAttrs
/-!
# Ordered scalar product
In this file we define
* `OrderedSMul R M` : an ordered additive commutative monoid `M` is an `OrderedSMul`
over an `OrderedSemiring` `R` if the scalar product respects the order relation on the
monoid and on the ring. There is a correspondence between this structure and convex cones,
which is proven in `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone.lean`.
## Implementation notes
* We choose to define `OrderedSMul` as a `Prop`-valued mixin, so that it can be
used for actions, modules, and algebras
(the axioms for an "ordered algebra" are exactly that the algebra is ordered as a module).
* To get ordered modules and ordered vector spaces, it suffices to replace the
`OrderedAddCommMonoid` and the `OrderedSemiring` as desired.
## TODO
This file is now mostly useless. We should try deleting `OrderedSMul`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_vector_space
## Tags
ordered module, ordered scalar, ordered smul, ordered action, ordered vector space
-/
/-- The ordered scalar product property is when an ordered additive commutative monoid
with a partial order has a scalar multiplication which is compatible with the order. Note that this
is different from `IsOrderedSMul`, which uses `≤`, has no semiring assumption, and has no positivity
constraint on the defining conditions.
-/
class OrderedSMul (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R]
[AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [SMulWithZero R M] :
Prop where
/-- Scalar multiplication by positive elements preserves the order. -/
protected smul_lt_smul_of_pos : ∀ {a b : M}, ∀ {c : R}, a < b → 0 < c → c • a < c • b
/-- If `c • a < c • b` for some positive `c`, then `a < b`. -/
protected lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos : ∀ {a b : M}, ∀ {c : R}, c • a < c • b → 0 < c → a < b
variable {ι 𝕜 R M N : Type*}
section OrderedSMul
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M]
[SMulWithZero R M] [OrderedSMul R M]
instance OrderedSMul.toPosSMulStrictMono : PosSMulStrictMono R M where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := OrderedSMul.smul_lt_smul_of_pos hb ha
instance OrderedSMul.toPosSMulReflectLT : PosSMulReflectLT R M :=
PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos fun _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h ↦ OrderedSMul.lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos h ha
instance OrderDual.instOrderedSMul : OrderedSMul R Mᵒᵈ where
smul_lt_smul_of_pos := OrderedSMul.smul_lt_smul_of_pos (M := M)
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos := OrderedSMul.lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos (M := M)
end OrderedSMul
/-- To prove that a linear ordered monoid is an ordered module, it suffices to verify only the first
axiom of `OrderedSMul`. -/
theorem OrderedSMul.mk'' [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [SMulWithZero 𝕜 M]
(h : ∀ ⦃c : 𝕜⦄, 0 < c → StrictMono fun a : M => c • a) : OrderedSMul 𝕜 M :=
{ smul_lt_smul_of_pos := fun hab hc => h hc hab
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos := fun hab hc => (h hc).lt_iff_lt.1 hab }
instance Nat.orderedSMul [AddCommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid M] :
OrderedSMul ℕ M :=
OrderedSMul.mk'' fun n hn a b hab => by
cases n with
| zero => cases hn
| succ n =>
induction n with
| zero => dsimp; rwa [one_nsmul, one_nsmul]
| succ n ih => simp only [succ_nsmul _ n.succ, _root_.add_lt_add (ih n.succ_pos) hab]
instance Int.orderedSMul [AddCommGroup M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedAddMonoid M] :
OrderedSMul ℤ M :=
OrderedSMul.mk'' fun n hn => by
cases n
· simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_pos, natCast_zsmul] at hn ⊢
exact strictMono_smul_left_of_pos hn
· cases (Int.negSucc_not_pos _).1 hn
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- TODO: `LinearOrderedField M → OrderedSMul ℚ M`
instance LinearOrderedSemiring.toOrderedSMul : OrderedSMul R R :=
OrderedSMul.mk'' fun _ => strictMono_mul_left_of_pos
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M]
[AddCommMonoid N] [PartialOrder N]
[MulActionWithZero 𝕜 M] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 N]
/-- To prove that a vector space over a linear ordered field is ordered, it suffices to verify only
the first axiom of `OrderedSMul`. -/
theorem OrderedSMul.mk' (h : ∀ ⦃a b : M⦄ ⦃c : 𝕜⦄, a < b → 0 < c → c • a ≤ c • b) :
OrderedSMul 𝕜 M := by
have hlt' : ∀ (a b : M) (c : 𝕜), a < b → 0 < c → c • a < c • b := by
refine fun a b c hab hc => (h hab hc).lt_of_ne ?_
rw [Ne, hc.ne'.isUnit.smul_left_cancel]
exact hab.ne
refine ⟨fun {a b c} => hlt' a b c, fun {a b c hab hc} => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hc.ne'.isUnit
rw [← inv_smul_smul c a, ← inv_smul_smul c b]
refine hlt' _ _ _ hab (pos_of_mul_pos_right ?_ hc.le)
simp only [c.mul_inv, zero_lt_one]
instance [OrderedSMul 𝕜 M] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 N] : OrderedSMul 𝕜 (M × N) :=
OrderedSMul.mk' fun _ _ _ h hc =>
⟨smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h.1.1 hc.le, smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h.1.2 hc.le⟩
instance Pi.orderedSMul {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, PartialOrder (M i)]
[∀ i, MulActionWithZero 𝕜 (M i)] [∀ i, OrderedSMul 𝕜 (M i)] : OrderedSMul 𝕜 (∀ i, M i) :=
OrderedSMul.mk' fun _ _ _ h hc i => smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (h.le i) hc.le
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section Invertible
variable (α : Type*) {β : Type*}
variable [Semiring α] [Invertible (2 : α)] [Lattice β] [AddCommGroup β] [Module α β]
[AddLeftMono β]
lemma inf_eq_half_smul_add_sub_abs_sub (x y : β) : x ⊓ y = (⅟2 : α) • (x + y - |y - x|) := by
rw [← two_nsmul_inf_eq_add_sub_abs_sub x y, two_smul, ← two_smul α,
smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
lemma sup_eq_half_smul_add_add_abs_sub (x y : β) : x ⊔ y = (⅟2 : α) • (x + y + |y - x|) := by
rw [← two_nsmul_sup_eq_add_add_abs_sub x y, two_smul, ← two_smul α,
smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
end Invertible
section DivisionSemiring
variable (α : Type*) {β : Type*}
variable [DivisionSemiring α] [NeZero (2 : α)] [Lattice β] [AddCommGroup β] [Module α β]
[AddLeftMono β]
lemma inf_eq_half_smul_add_sub_abs_sub' (x y : β) : x ⊓ y = (2⁻¹ : α) • (x + y - |y - x|) := by
letI := invertibleOfNonzero (two_ne_zero' α)
exact inf_eq_half_smul_add_sub_abs_sub α x y
lemma sup_eq_half_smul_add_add_abs_sub' (x y : β) : x ⊔ y = (2⁻¹ : α) • (x + y + |y - x|) := by
letI := invertibleOfNonzero (two_ne_zero' α)
| exact sup_eq_half_smul_add_add_abs_sub α x y
end DivisionSemiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Module/OrderedSMul.lean | 165 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,351 | 2,352 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.ExtendFrom
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
# Lemmas about `extendFrom` in an order topology.
-/
open Filter Set Topology
variable {α β : Type*}
theorem continuousOn_Icc_extendFrom_Ioo [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α]
[OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [RegularSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {la lb : β}
(hab : a ≠ b) (hf : ContinuousOn f (Ioo a b)) (ha : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 la))
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 lb)) : ContinuousOn (extendFrom (Ioo a b) f) (Icc a b) := by
apply continuousOn_extendFrom
· rw [closure_Ioo hab]
· intro x x_in
rcases eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc x_in with (rfl | rfl | h)
· exact ⟨la, ha.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
· exact ⟨lb, hb.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ Ioo_subset_Iio_self⟩
· exact ⟨f x, hf x h⟩
theorem eq_lim_at_left_extendFrom_Ioo [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α]
[OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {la : β} (hab : a < b)
(ha : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 la)) : extendFrom (Ioo a b) f a = la := by
apply extendFrom_eq
· rw [closure_Ioo hab.ne]
simp only [le_of_lt hab, left_mem_Icc, right_mem_Icc]
· simpa [hab]
theorem eq_lim_at_right_extendFrom_Ioo [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α]
[OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {lb : β} (hab : a < b)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 lb)) : extendFrom (Ioo a b) f b = lb := by
apply extendFrom_eq
| · rw [closure_Ioo hab.ne]
simp only [le_of_lt hab, left_mem_Icc, right_mem_Icc]
· simpa [hab]
theorem continuousOn_Ico_extendFrom_Ioo [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α]
[OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [RegularSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b : α} {la : β}
(hab : a < b) (hf : ContinuousOn f (Ioo a b)) (ha : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 la)) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/ExtendFrom.lean | 41 | 47 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Data.Vector3
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic
/-!
# Diophantine functions and Matiyasevic's theorem
Hilbert's tenth problem asked whether there exists an algorithm which for a given integer polynomial
determines whether this polynomial has integer solutions. It was answered in the negative in 1970,
the final step being completed by Matiyasevic who showed that the power function is Diophantine.
Here a function is called Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine as a set. A subset `S ⊆ ℕ ^ α` in
turn is called Diophantine if there exists an integer polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff
there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
## Main definitions
* `IsPoly`: a predicate stating that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
* `Poly`: the type of multivariate integer polynomial functions.
* `Dioph`: a predicate stating that a set is Diophantine, i.e. a set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is
Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there
exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
* `DiophFn`: a predicate on a function stating that it is Diophantine in the sense that its graph
is Diophantine as a set.
## Main statements
* `pell_dioph` states that solutions to Pell's equation form a Diophantine set.
* `pow_dioph` states that the power function is Diophantine, a version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevic's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
## TODO
* Finish the solution of Hilbert's tenth problem.
* Connect `Poly` to `MvPolynomial`
-/
open Fin2 Function Nat Sum
local infixr:67 " ::ₒ " => Option.elim'
local infixr:65 " ⊗ " => Sum.elim
universe u
/-!
### Multivariate integer polynomials
Note that this duplicates `MvPolynomial`.
-/
section Polynomials
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A predicate asserting that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
(We are being a bit lazy here by allowing many representations for multiplication,
rather than only allowing monomials and addition, but the definition is equivalent
and this is easier to use.) -/
inductive IsPoly : ((α → ℕ) → ℤ) → Prop
| proj : ∀ i, IsPoly fun x : α → ℕ => x i
| const : ∀ n : ℤ, IsPoly fun _ : α → ℕ => n
| sub : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x - g x
| mul : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x * g x
theorem IsPoly.neg {f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} : IsPoly f → IsPoly (-f) := by
rw [← zero_sub]; exact (IsPoly.const 0).sub
theorem IsPoly.add {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} (hf : IsPoly f) (hg : IsPoly g) : IsPoly (f + g) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add]; exact hf.sub hg.neg
/-- The type of multivariate integer polynomials -/
def Poly (α : Type u) := { f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ // IsPoly f }
namespace Poly
section
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Poly α) (α → ℕ) ℤ :=
⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
/-- The underlying function of a `Poly` is a polynomial -/
protected theorem isPoly (f : Poly α) : IsPoly f := f.2
/-- Extensionality for `Poly α` -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Poly α} : (∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g := DFunLike.ext _ _
/-- The `i`th projection function, `x_i`. -/
def proj (i : α) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.proj i⟩
@[simp]
theorem proj_apply (i : α) (x) : proj i x = x i := rfl
/-- The constant function with value `n : ℤ`. -/
def const (n : ℤ) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.const n⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (n) (x : α → ℕ) : const n x = n := rfl
instance : Zero (Poly α) := ⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (Poly α) := ⟨const 1⟩
instance : Neg (Poly α) := ⟨fun f => ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
instance : Add (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
instance : Sub (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f - g, f.2.sub g.2⟩⟩
instance : Mul (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Poly α) = const 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : Poly α) = const 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : Poly α) : ⇑(-f) = -f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f * g) = f * g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x) : (0 : Poly α) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (x) : (1 : Poly α) x = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : Poly α) (x) : (-f) x = -f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f * g) x = f x * g x := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Inhabited (Poly α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : AddCommGroup (Poly α) where
add := ((· + ·) : Poly α → Poly α → Poly α)
neg := (Neg.neg : Poly α → Poly α)
sub := Sub.sub
zero := 0
nsmul := @nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, add_zero]
zero_add _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, zero_add]
add_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, add_comm]
add_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, ← add_assoc]
neg_add_cancel _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, neg_apply, neg_add_cancel, zero_apply]
instance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α) :=
{ (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α)) with
one := 1
natCast := fun n => Poly.const n
intCast := Poly.const }
instance : CommRing (Poly α) where
__ := (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α))
__ := (inferInstance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α))
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec _ ⟨(1 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, one_mul]
mul_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply mul_add
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp only [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply add_mul
theorem induction {C : Poly α → Prop} (H1 : ∀ i, C (proj i)) (H2 : ∀ n, C (const n))
(H3 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f - g)) (H4 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f * g)) (f : Poly α) : C f := by
obtain ⟨f, pf⟩ := f
induction pf with
| proj => apply H1
| const => apply H2
| sub _ _ ihf ihg => apply H3 _ _ ihf ihg
| mul _ _ ihf ihg => apply H4 _ _ ihf ihg
/-- The sum of squares of a list of polynomials. This is relevant for
Diophantine equations, because it means that a list of equations
can be encoded as a single equation: `x = 0 ∧ y = 0 ∧ z = 0` is
equivalent to `x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0`. -/
def sumsq : List (Poly α) → Poly α
| [] => 0
| p::ps => p * p + sumsq ps
theorem sumsq_nonneg (x : α → ℕ) : ∀ l, 0 ≤ sumsq l x
| [] => le_refl 0
| p::ps => by
rw [sumsq]
exact add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (sumsq_nonneg _ ps)
theorem sumsq_eq_zero (x) : ∀ l, sumsq l x = 0 ↔ l.Forall fun a : Poly α => a x = 0
| [] => eq_self_iff_true _
| | p::ps => by
rw [List.forall_cons, ← sumsq_eq_zero _ ps]; rw [sumsq]
exact
⟨fun h : p x * p x + sumsq ps x = 0 =>
have : p x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero <|
le_antisymm
(by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Dioph.lean | 225 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
/-!
# The length function, reduced words, and descents
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
Given any element $w \in W$, its *length* (`CoxeterSystem.length`), denoted $\ell(w)$, is the
minimum number $\ell$ such that $w$ can be written as a product of a sequence of $\ell$ simple
reflections:
$$w = s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}.$$
We prove for all $w_1, w_2 \in W$ that $\ell (w_1 w_2) \leq \ell (w_1) + \ell (w_2)$
and that $\ell (w_1 w_2)$ has the same parity as $\ell (w_1) + \ell (w_2)$.
We define a *reduced word* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReduced`) for an element $w \in W$ to be a way of
writing $w$ as a product of exactly $\ell(w)$ simple reflections. Every element of $W$ has a reduced
word.
We say that $i \in B$ is a *left descent* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftDescent`) of $w \in W$ if
$\ell(s_i w) < \ell(w)$. We show that if $i$ is a left descent of $w$, then
$\ell(s_i w) + 1 = \ell(w)$. On the other hand, if $i$ is not a left descent of $w$, then
$\ell(s_i w) = \ell(w) + 1$. We similarly define right descents (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightDescent`) and
prove analogous results.
## Main definitions
* `cs.length`
* `cs.IsReduced`
* `cs.IsLeftDescent`
* `cs.IsRightDescent`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
/-! ### Length -/
private theorem exists_word_with_prod (w : W) : ∃ n ω, ω.length = n ∧ π ω = w := by
rcases cs.wordProd_surjective w with ⟨ω, rfl⟩
use ω.length, ω
open scoped Classical in
/-- The length of `w`; i.e., the minimum number of simple reflections that
must be multiplied to form `w`. -/
noncomputable def length (w : W) : ℕ := Nat.find (cs.exists_word_with_prod w)
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
theorem exists_reduced_word (w : W) : ∃ ω, ω.length = ℓ w ∧ w = π ω := by
classical
have := Nat.find_spec (cs.exists_word_with_prod w)
tauto
open scoped Classical in
theorem length_wordProd_le (ω : List B) : ℓ (π ω) ≤ ω.length :=
Nat.find_min' (cs.exists_word_with_prod (π ω)) ⟨ω, by tauto⟩
@[simp] theorem length_one : ℓ (1 : W) = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (cs.length_wordProd_le [])
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {w : W} : ℓ w = 0 ↔ w = 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
have : ω = [] := eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (hω.trans h)
rw [this, wordProd_nil]
· rintro rfl
exact cs.length_one
@[simp]
theorem length_inv (w : W) : ℓ (w⁻¹) = ℓ w := by
apply Nat.le_antisymm
· rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (List.reverse ω)
rwa [wordProd_reverse, length_reverse, hω] at this
· rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w⁻¹ with ⟨ω, hω, h'ω⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (List.reverse ω)
rwa [wordProd_reverse, length_reverse, ← h'ω, hω, inv_inv] at this
theorem length_mul_le (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ (w₁ * w₂) ≤ ℓ w₁ + ℓ w₂ := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w₁ with ⟨ω₁, hω₁, rfl⟩
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w₂ with ⟨ω₂, hω₂, rfl⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω₁ ++ ω₂)
simpa [hω₁, hω₂, wordProd_append] using this
theorem length_mul_ge_length_sub_length (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ w₁ - ℓ w₂ ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) := by
simpa [Nat.sub_le_of_le_add] using cs.length_mul_le (w₁ * w₂) w₂⁻¹
theorem length_mul_ge_length_sub_length' (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ w₂ - ℓ w₁ ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) := by
simpa [Nat.sub_le_of_le_add, add_comm] using cs.length_mul_le w₁⁻¹ (w₁ * w₂)
theorem length_mul_ge_max (w₁ w₂ : W) :
max (ℓ w₁ - ℓ w₂) (ℓ w₂ - ℓ w₁) ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) :=
max_le_iff.mpr ⟨length_mul_ge_length_sub_length _ _ _, length_mul_ge_length_sub_length' _ _ _⟩
/-- The homomorphism that sends each element `w : W` to the parity of the length of `w`.
(See `lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length`.) -/
def lengthParity : W →* Multiplicative (ZMod 2) := cs.lift ⟨fun _ ↦ Multiplicative.ofAdd 1, by
simp_rw [CoxeterMatrix.IsLiftable, ← ofAdd_add, (by decide : (1 + 1 : ZMod 2) = 0)]
simp⟩
theorem lengthParity_simple (i : B) :
cs.lengthParity (s i) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 := cs.lift_apply_simple _ _
theorem lengthParity_comp_simple :
cs.lengthParity ∘ cs.simple = fun _ ↦ Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 := funext cs.lengthParity_simple
theorem lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length (w : W) :
cs.lengthParity w = Multiplicative.ofAdd (↑(ℓ w)) := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
rw [← hω, wordProd, map_list_prod, List.map_map, lengthParity_comp_simple, map_const',
prod_replicate, ← ofAdd_nsmul, nsmul_one]
theorem length_mul_mod_two (w₁ w₂ : W) : ℓ (w₁ * w₂) % 2 = (ℓ w₁ + ℓ w₂) % 2 := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff', Nat.cast_add]
simpa only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, ofAdd_add] using map_mul cs.lengthParity w₁ w₂
@[simp]
theorem length_simple (i : B) : ℓ (s i) = 1 := by
apply Nat.le_antisymm
· simpa using cs.length_wordProd_le [i]
· by_contra! length_lt_one
have : cs.lengthParity (s i) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 0 := by
rw [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, Nat.lt_one_iff.mp length_lt_one, Nat.cast_zero]
have : Multiplicative.ofAdd (0 : ZMod 2) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 :=
this.symm.trans (cs.lengthParity_simple i)
contradiction
theorem length_eq_one_iff {w : W} : ℓ w = 1 ↔ ∃ i : B, w = s i := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
rcases List.length_eq_one_iff.mp (hω.trans h) with ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, cs.wordProd_singleton i⟩
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact cs.length_simple i
theorem length_mul_simple_ne (w : W) (i : B) : ℓ (w * s i) ≠ ℓ w := by
intro eq
have length_mod_two := cs.length_mul_mod_two w (s i)
rw [eq, length_simple] at length_mod_two
rcases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (ℓ w) with even | odd
· rw [even, Nat.succ_mod_two_eq_one_iff.mpr even] at length_mod_two
contradiction
· rw [odd, Nat.succ_mod_two_eq_zero_iff.mpr odd] at length_mod_two
contradiction
theorem length_simple_mul_ne (w : W) (i : B) : ℓ (s i * w) ≠ ℓ w := by
convert cs.length_mul_simple_ne w⁻¹ i using 1
· convert cs.length_inv ?_ using 2
simp
· simp
theorem length_mul_simple (w : W) (i : B) :
ℓ (w * s i) = ℓ w + 1 ∨ ℓ (w * s i) + 1 = ℓ w := by
rcases Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne (cs.length_mul_simple_ne w i) with lt | gt
· -- lt : ℓ (w * s i) < ℓ w
right
have length_ge := cs.length_mul_ge_length_sub_length w (s i)
simp only [length_simple, tsub_le_iff_right] at length_ge
-- length_ge : ℓ w ≤ ℓ (w * s i) + 1
omega
· -- gt : ℓ w < ℓ (w * s i)
left
have length_le := cs.length_mul_le w (s i)
simp only [length_simple] at length_le
-- length_le : ℓ (w * s i) ≤ ℓ w + 1
omega
theorem length_simple_mul (w : W) (i : B) :
ℓ (s i * w) = ℓ w + 1 ∨ ℓ (s i * w) + 1 = ℓ w := by
have := cs.length_mul_simple w⁻¹ i
rwa [(by simp : w⁻¹ * (s i) = ((s i) * w)⁻¹), length_inv, length_inv] at this
/-! ### Reduced words -/
/-- The proposition that `ω` is reduced; that is, it has minimal length among all words that
represent the same element of `W`. -/
def IsReduced (ω : List B) : Prop := ℓ (π ω) = ω.length
@[simp]
theorem isReduced_reverse_iff (ω : List B) : cs.IsReduced (ω.reverse) ↔ cs.IsReduced ω := by
simp [IsReduced]
theorem IsReduced.reverse {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B}
(hω : cs.IsReduced ω) : cs.IsReduced (ω.reverse) :=
(cs.isReduced_reverse_iff ω).mpr hω
theorem exists_reduced_word' (w : W) : ∃ ω : List B, cs.IsReduced ω ∧ w = π ω := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
use ω
tauto
private theorem isReduced_take_and_drop {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.take j) ∧ cs.IsReduced (ω.drop j) := by
have h₁ : ℓ (π (ω.take j)) ≤ (ω.take j).length := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω.take j)
have h₂ : ℓ (π (ω.drop j)) ≤ (ω.drop j).length := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω.drop j)
have h₃ := calc
(ω.take j).length + (ω.drop j).length
_ = ω.length := by rw [← List.length_append, ω.take_append_drop j]
_ = ℓ (π ω) := hω.symm
_ = ℓ (π (ω.take j) * π (ω.drop j)) := by rw [← cs.wordProd_append, ω.take_append_drop j]
_ ≤ ℓ (π (ω.take j)) + ℓ (π (ω.drop j)) := cs.length_mul_le _ _
unfold IsReduced
omega
theorem IsReduced.take {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.take j) :=
(isReduced_take_and_drop _ hω _).1
theorem IsReduced.drop {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.drop j) :=
(isReduced_take_and_drop _ hω _).2
theorem not_isReduced_alternatingWord (i i' : B) {m : ℕ} (hM : M i i' ≠ 0) (hm : m > M i i') :
¬cs.IsReduced (alternatingWord i i' m) := by
induction' hm with m _ ih
· -- Base case; m = M i i' + 1
suffices h : ℓ (π (alternatingWord i i' (M i i' + 1))) < M i i' + 1 by
unfold IsReduced
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, length_alternatingWord]
omega
have : M i i' + 1 ≤ M i i' * 2 := by linarith [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hM]
rw [cs.prod_alternatingWord_eq_prod_alternatingWord_sub i i' _ this]
have : M i i' * 2 - (M i i' + 1) = M i i' - 1 := by omega
rw [this]
calc
ℓ (π (alternatingWord i' i (M i i' - 1)))
_ ≤ (alternatingWord i' i (M i i' - 1)).length := cs.length_wordProd_le _
_ = M i i' - 1 := length_alternatingWord _ _ _
_ ≤ M i i' := Nat.sub_le _ _
_ < M i i' + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
· -- Inductive step
contrapose! ih
rw [alternatingWord_succ'] at ih
apply IsReduced.drop (j := 1) at ih
simpa using ih
/-! ### Descents -/
/-- The proposition that `i` is a left descent of `w`; that is, $\ell(s_i w) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsLeftDescent (w : W) (i : B) : Prop := ℓ (s i * w) < ℓ w
/-- The proposition that `i` is a right descent of `w`; that is, $\ell(w s_i) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsRightDescent (w : W) (i : B) : Prop := ℓ (w * s i) < ℓ w
| theorem not_isLeftDescent_one (i : B) : ¬cs.IsLeftDescent 1 i := by simp [IsLeftDescent]
theorem not_isRightDescent_one (i : B) : ¬cs.IsRightDescent 1 i := by simp [IsRightDescent]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean | 277 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,769 | 1,771 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Basic
/-!
# p-adic norm
This file defines the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ`.
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` is the difference of the multiplicities of `p` in the numerator and
denominator of `q`. This function obeys the standard properties of a valuation, with the appropriate
assumptions on `p`.
The valuation induces a norm on `ℚ`. This norm is a nonarchimedean absolute value.
It takes values in {0} ∪ {1/p^k | k ∈ ℤ}.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation
-/
/-- If `q ≠ 0`, the `p`-adic norm of a rational `q` is `p ^ (-padicValRat p q)`.
If `q = 0`, the `p`-adic norm of `q` is `0`. -/
def padicNorm (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) : ℚ :=
if q = 0 then 0 else (p : ℚ) ^ (-padicValRat p q)
namespace padicNorm
open padicValRat
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- Unfolds the definition of the `p`-adic norm of `q` when `q ≠ 0`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem eq_zpow_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
padicNorm p q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-padicValRat p q) := by simp [hq, padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm is nonnegative. -/
protected theorem nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ padicNorm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq, padicNorm]
else by
unfold padicNorm
split_ifs
apply zpow_nonneg
exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `0` is `0`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicNorm p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `1` is `1`. -/
protected theorem one : padicNorm p 1 = 1 := by simp [padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is `p⁻¹` if `p > 1`.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_of_prime` for a version assuming `p` is prime. -/
theorem padicNorm_p (hp : 1 < p) : padicNorm p p = (p : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
simp [padicNorm, (pos_of_gt hp).ne', padicValNat.self hp]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is `p⁻¹` if `p` is prime.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p` for a version assuming `1 < p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem padicNorm_p_of_prime [Fact p.Prime] : padicNorm p p = (p : ℚ)⁻¹ :=
padicNorm_p <| Nat.Prime.one_lt Fact.out
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `q` is `1` if `q` is prime and not equal to `p`. -/
theorem padicNorm_of_prime_of_ne {q : ℕ} [p_prime : Fact p.Prime] [q_prime : Fact q.Prime]
(neq : p ≠ q) : padicNorm p q = 1 := by
have p : padicValRat p q = 0 := mod_cast padicValNat_primes neq
rw [padicNorm, p]
simp [q_prime.1.ne_zero]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is less than `1` if `1 < p`.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_lt_one_of_prime` for a version assuming `p` is prime. -/
theorem padicNorm_p_lt_one (hp : 1 < p) : padicNorm p p < 1 := by
rw [padicNorm_p hp, inv_lt_one_iff₀]
exact mod_cast Or.inr hp
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is less than `1` if `p` is prime.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_lt_one` for a version assuming `1 < p`. -/
theorem padicNorm_p_lt_one_of_prime [Fact p.Prime] : padicNorm p p < 1 :=
padicNorm_p_lt_one <| Nat.Prime.one_lt Fact.out
/-- `padicNorm p q` takes discrete values `p ^ -z` for `z : ℤ`. -/
protected theorem values_discrete {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, padicNorm p q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) :=
⟨padicValRat p q, by simp [padicNorm, hq]⟩
/-- `padicNorm p` is symmetric. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem neg (q : ℚ) : padicNorm p (-q) = padicNorm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq] else by simp [padicNorm, hq]
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- If `q ≠ 0`, then `padicNorm p q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : padicNorm p q ≠ 0 := by
rw [padicNorm.eq_zpow_of_nonzero hq]
apply zpow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast ne_of_gt hp.1.pos
/-- If the `p`-adic norm of `q` is 0, then `q` is `0`. -/
theorem zero_of_padicNorm_eq_zero {q : ℚ} (h : padicNorm p q = 0) : q = 0 := by
apply by_contradiction; intro hq
unfold padicNorm at h; rw [if_neg hq] at h
apply absurd h
apply zpow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero
/-- The `p`-adic norm is multiplicative. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem mul (q r : ℚ) : padicNorm p (q * r) = padicNorm p q * padicNorm p r :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq]
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else by
have : (p : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by simp [hp.1.ne_zero]
simp [padicNorm, *, padicValRat.mul, zpow_add₀ this, mul_comm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm respects division. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem div (q r : ℚ) : padicNorm p (q / r) = padicNorm p q / padicNorm p r :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else eq_div_of_mul_eq (padicNorm.nonzero hr) (by rw [← padicNorm.mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr])
/-- The `p`-adic norm of an integer is at most `1`. -/
protected theorem of_int (z : ℤ) : padicNorm p z ≤ 1 := by
obtain rfl | hz := eq_or_ne z 0
· simp
· rw [padicNorm, if_neg (mod_cast hz)]
exact zpow_le_one_of_nonpos₀ (mod_cast hp.1.one_le) (by simp)
private theorem nonarchimedean_aux {q r : ℚ} (h : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p r) :
padicNorm p (q + r) ≤ max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) :=
have hnqp : padicNorm p q ≥ 0 := padicNorm.nonneg _
have hnrp : padicNorm p r ≥ 0 := padicNorm.nonneg _
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq, max_eq_right hnrp, le_max_right]
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr, max_eq_left hnqp, le_max_left]
else
| if hqr : q + r = 0 then le_trans (by simpa [hqr] using hnqp) (le_max_left _ _)
else by
unfold padicNorm; split_ifs
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNorm.lean | 158 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DeleteEdges
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
/-!
# Subgraphs of a simple graph
A subgraph of a simple graph consists of subsets of the graph's vertices and edges such that the
endpoints of each edge are present in the vertex subset. The edge subset is formalized as a
sub-relation of the adjacency relation of the simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `Subgraph G` is the type of subgraphs of a `G : SimpleGraph V`.
* `Subgraph.neighborSet`, `Subgraph.incidenceSet`, and `Subgraph.degree` are like their
`SimpleGraph` counterparts, but they refer to vertices from `G` to avoid subtype coercions.
* `Subgraph.coe` is the coercion from a `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`.
(In Lean 3 this could not be a `Coe` instance since the destination type depends on `G'`.)
* `Subgraph.IsSpanning` for whether a subgraph is a spanning subgraph and
`Subgraph.IsInduced` for whether a subgraph is an induced subgraph.
* Instances for `Lattice (Subgraph G)` and `BoundedOrder (Subgraph G)`.
* `SimpleGraph.toSubgraph`: If a `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another, then you can turn it
into a member of the larger graph's `SimpleGraph.Subgraph` type.
* Graph homomorphisms from a subgraph to a graph (`Subgraph.map_top`) and between subgraphs
(`Subgraph.map`).
## Implementation notes
* Recall that subgraphs are not determined by their vertex sets, so `SetLike` does not apply to
this kind of subobject.
## TODO
* Images of graph homomorphisms as subgraphs.
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- A subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` is a subset of vertices along with a restriction of the adjacency
relation that is symmetric and is supported by the vertex subset. They also form a bounded lattice.
Thinking of `V → V → Prop` as `Set (V × V)`, a set of darts (i.e., half-edges), then
`Subgraph.adj_sub` is that the darts of a subgraph are a subset of the darts of `G`. -/
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
/-- Vertices of the subgraph -/
verts : Set V
/-- Edges of the subgraph -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
/-- The one-vertex subgraph. -/
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
/-- The one-edge subgraph. -/
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {H : G.Subgraph} {u v w x : V} (h2 : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) :
H.Adj u v ↔ H.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h2
rcases h2 with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, Subgraph.adj_comm]
/-- Coercion from `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`. -/
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
instance (G : SimpleGraph V) (H : Subgraph G) [DecidableRel H.Adj] : DecidableRel H.coe.Adj :=
fun a b ↦ ‹DecidableRel H.Adj› _ _
/-- A subgraph is called a *spanning subgraph* if it contains all the vertices of `G`. -/
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
protected alias ⟨IsSpanning.verts_eq_univ, _⟩ := isSpanning_iff
/-- Coercion from `Subgraph G` to `SimpleGraph V`. If `G'` is a spanning
subgraph, then `G'.spanningCoe` yields an isomorphic graph.
In general, this adds in all vertices from `V` as isolated vertices. -/
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
lemma spanningCoe_le (G' : G.Subgraph) : G'.spanningCoe ≤ G := fun _ _ ↦ G'.3
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
lemma mem_of_adj_spanningCoe {v w : V} {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s)
(hadj : G.spanningCoe.Adj v w) : v ∈ s := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma spanningCoe_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hadj : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hadj).spanningCoe = fromEdgeSet {s(v, w)} := by
ext v w
aesop
/-- `spanningCoe` is equivalent to `coe` for a subgraph that `IsSpanning`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph is called an *induced subgraph* if vertices of `G'` are adjacent if
they are adjacent in `G`. -/
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ G'.verts → ∀ ⦃w⦄, w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
@[simp] protected lemma IsInduced.adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (hG' : G'.IsInduced) {a b : G'.verts} :
G'.Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
⟨coe_adj_sub _ _ _, hG' a.2 b.2⟩
/-- `H.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in the subgraph `H`. -/
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
/-- `G'.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G'`. -/
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph as a graph has equivalent neighbor sets. -/
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The edge set of `G'` consists of a subset of edges of `G`. -/
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := .rfl
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_coe {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.edgeSet = Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' G'.edgeSet := by
ext e; induction e using Sym2.ind; simp
lemma image_coe_edgeSet_coe (G' : G.Subgraph) : Sym2.map (↑) '' G'.coe.edgeSet = G'.edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_coe, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
rintro e he
induction e using Sym2.ind with | h a b =>
rw [Subgraph.mem_edgeSet] at he
exact ⟨s(⟨a, edge_vert _ he⟩, ⟨b, edge_vert _ he.symm⟩), Sym2.map_pair_eq ..⟩
theorem mem_verts_of_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
induction e
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
/-- The `incidenceSet` is the set of edges incident to a given vertex. -/
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
/-- Give a vertex as an element of the subgraph's vertex type. -/
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
/--
Create an equal copy of a subgraph (see `copy_eq`) with possibly different definitional equalities.
See Note [range copy pattern].
-/
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext hV hadj
/-- The union of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Max G.Subgraph where
max G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The intersection of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Min G.Subgraph where
min G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The `top` subgraph is `G` as a subgraph of itself. -/
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
/-- The `bot` subgraph is the subgraph with no vertices or edges. -/
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem verts_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).verts = ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sInf s).verts = ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_iSup {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).verts = ⋃ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem verts_iInf {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).verts = ⋂ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iInf]
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).coe = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma IsInduced.top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).IsInduced := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ id
/-- The graph isomorphism between the top element of `G.subgraph` and `G`. -/
def topIso : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).coe ≃g G where
toFun := (↑)
invFun a := ⟨a, Set.mem_univ _⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eta ..
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := .rfl
theorem verts_spanningCoe_injective :
(fun G' : Subgraph G => (G'.verts, G'.spanningCoe)).Injective := by
intro G₁ G₂ h
rw [Prod.ext_iff] at h
exact Subgraph.ext h.1 (spanningCoe_inj.1 h.2)
/-- For subgraphs `G₁`, `G₂`, `G₁ ≤ G₂` iff `G₁.verts ⊆ G₂.verts` and
`∀ a b, G₁.adj a b → G₂.adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ show DistribLattice G.Subgraph from
verts_spanningCoe_injective.distribLattice _
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun x y => x.verts ⊆ y.verts ∧ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w }
instance : BoundedOrder (Subgraph G) where
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top x := ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => x.adj_sub⟩
bot_le _ := ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- Note that subgraphs do not form a Boolean algebra, because of `verts`. -/
def completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms : CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms G.Subgraph :=
{ Subgraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top := fun G' => ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => G'.adj_sub⟩
bot_le := fun _ => ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
sSup := sSup
-- Porting note: needed `apply` here to modify elaboration; previously the term itself was fine.
le_sSup := fun s G' hG' => ⟨by apply Set.subset_iUnion₂ G' hG', fun _ _ hab => ⟨G', hG', hab⟩⟩
sSup_le := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, by
rintro a b ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact (hG' _ hH).2 hab⟩
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun _ G' hG' => ⟨Set.iInter₂_subset G' hG', fun _ _ hab => hab.1 hG'⟩
le_sInf := fun _ G' hG' =>
⟨Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, fun _ _ hab =>
⟨fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).2 hab, G'.adj_sub hab⟩⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => Subgraph.ext (by simpa using iInf_iSup_eq)
(by ext; simp [Classical.skolem]) }
instance : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
.ofMinimalAxioms completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms
@[gcongr] lemma verts_mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (h : H ≤ H') : H.verts ⊆ H'.verts := h.1
lemma verts_monotone : Monotone (verts : G.Subgraph → Set V) := fun _ _ h ↦ h.1
@[simps]
instance subgraphInhabited : Inhabited (Subgraph G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sup {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊔ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∪ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_inf {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊓ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∩ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_top (v : V) : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_bot (v : V) : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sSup s).neighborSet v = ⋃ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sInf s).neighborSet v = (⋂ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨆ i, f i).neighborSet v = ⋃ i, (f i).neighborSet v := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨅ i, f i).neighborSet v = (⋂ i, (f i).neighborSet v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = G.edgeSet := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊓ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∩ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∪ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).edgeSet = ⋃ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G' := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) :
(sInf s).edgeSet = (⋂ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G') ∩ G.edgeSet := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨆ i, f i).edgeSet = ⋃ i, (f i).edgeSet := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨅ i, f i).edgeSet = (⋂ i, (f i).edgeSet) ∩ G.edgeSet := by
simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = ⊥ := rfl
/-- Turn a subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` into a member of its subgraph type. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) : G.Subgraph where
verts := Set.univ
Adj := H.Adj
adj_sub e := h e
edge_vert _ := Set.mem_univ _
symm := H.symm
theorem support_mono {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.support ⊆ H'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h.2
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) :
(toSubgraph H h).IsSpanning :=
Set.mem_univ
theorem spanningCoe_le_of_le {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.spanningCoe ≤ H'.spanningCoe :=
h.2
@[simp]
lemma sup_spanningCoe (H H' : Subgraph G) :
(H ⊔ H').spanningCoe = H.spanningCoe ⊔ H'.spanningCoe := rfl
/-- The top of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the graph itself. -/
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g G where
toFun v := ↑v
invFun v := ⟨v, trivial⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- The bottom of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the empty graph on the empty
vertex type. -/
def botEquiv : (⊥ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g (⊥ : SimpleGraph Empty) where
toFun v := v.property.elim
invFun v := v.elim
left_inv := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.elim
right_inv v := v.elim
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
theorem edgeSet_mono {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.edgeSet ≤ H₂.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind h.2
theorem _root_.Disjoint.edgeSet {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Disjoint H₁.edgeSet H₂.edgeSet :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by simpa using edgeSet_mono h.le_bot
section map
variable {G' : SimpleGraph W} {f : G →g G'}
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a covariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) : G'.Subgraph where
verts := f '' H.verts
Adj := Relation.Map H.Adj f f
adj_sub := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact f.map_rel (H.adj_sub h)
edge_vert := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (H.edge_vert h)
symm := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨v, u, H.symm h, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id (H : G.Subgraph) : H.map Hom.id = H := by ext <;> simp
lemma map_comp {U : Type*} {G'' : SimpleGraph U} (H : G.Subgraph) (f : G →g G') (g : G' →g G'') :
H.map (g.comp f) = (H.map f).map g := by ext <;> simp [Subgraph.map]
@[gcongr] lemma map_mono {H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph} (hH : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.map f ≤ H₂.map f := by
constructor
· intro
simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro v hv rfl
exact ⟨_, hH.1 hv, rfl⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, hH.2 ha, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_monotone : Monotone (Subgraph.map f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_mono
theorem map_sup (f : G →g G') (H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph) : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).map f = H₁.map f ⊔ H₂.map f := by
ext <;> simp [Set.image_union, map_adj, sup_adj, Relation.Map, or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp] lemma map_iso_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (e : G ≃g H) : Subgraph.map e.toHom ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp [Relation.Map, e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, ← e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) :
(H.map f).edgeSet = Sym2.map f '' H.edgeSet := Sym2.fromRel_relationMap ..
end map
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a contravariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G'.Subgraph) : G.Subgraph where
verts := f ⁻¹' H.verts
Adj u v := G.Adj u v ∧ H.Adj (f u) (f v)
adj_sub h := h.1
edge_vert h := Set.mem_preimage.1 (H.edge_vert h.2)
symm _ _ h := ⟨G.symm h.1, H.symm h.2⟩
theorem comap_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.comap f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
apply h.1
· intro v w
simp +contextual only [comap_adj, and_imp, true_and]
intro
apply h.2
@[simp] lemma comap_equiv_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g H) : Subgraph.comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [f.map_adj]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) (H' : G'.Subgraph) :
H.map f ≤ H' ↔ H ≤ H'.comap f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun v hv ↦ ?_, fun v w hvw ↦ ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨fun v ↦ ?_, fun v w ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
exact h.1 ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
· simp only [H.adj_sub hvw, comap_adj, true_and]
exact h.2 ⟨v, w, hvw, rfl, rfl⟩
· simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro w hw rfl
exact h.1 hw
· simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro u u' hu rfl rfl
exact (h.2 hu).2
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.Subgraph := by
refine .ofBijective
(α := {H : Finset V × (V → V → Bool) //
(∀ a b, H.2 a b → G.Adj a b) ∧ (∀ a b, H.2 a b → a ∈ H.1) ∧ ∀ a b, H.2 a b = H.2 b a})
(fun H ↦ ⟨H.1.1, fun a b ↦ H.1.2 a b, @H.2.1, @H.2.2.1, by simp [Symmetric, H.2.2.2]⟩)
⟨?_, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩
simp [funext_iff]
· classical
exact ⟨⟨(H.verts.toFinset, fun a b ↦ H.Adj a b), fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.adj_sub,
fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.edge_vert, by simp [H.adj_comm]⟩, by simp⟩
instance [Finite V] : Finite G.Subgraph := by classical cases nonempty_fintype V; infer_instance
/-- Given two subgraphs, one a subgraph of the other, there is an induced injective homomorphism of
the subgraphs as graphs. -/
@[simps]
def inclusion {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : x.coe →g y.coe where
toFun v := ⟨↑v, And.left h v.property⟩
map_rel' hvw := h.2 hvw
theorem inclusion.injective {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := by
intro v w h
rw [inclusion, DFunLike.coe, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at h
exact Subtype.ext h
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` into `G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def hom (x : Subgraph G) : x.coe →g G where
toFun v := v
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
@[simp] lemma coe_hom (x : Subgraph G) :
(x.hom : x.verts → V) = (fun (v : x.verts) => (v : V)) := rfl
theorem hom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.hom :=
fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.ext
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias hom.injective := hom_injective
@[simp] lemma map_hom_top (G' : G.Subgraph) : Subgraph.map G'.hom ⊤ = G' := by
aesop (add unfold safe Relation.Map, unsafe G'.edge_vert, unsafe Adj.symm)
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` as
a spanning subgraph into `G`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningHom (x : Subgraph G) : x.spanningCoe →g G where
toFun := id
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
theorem spanningHom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.spanningHom :=
fun _ _ ↦ id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias spanningHom.injective := spanningHom_injective
theorem neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) (v : V) :
x.neighborSet v ⊆ y.neighborSet v :=
fun _ h' ↦ h.2 h'
instance neighborSet.decidablePred (G' : Subgraph G) [h : DecidableRel G'.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v) :=
h v
/-- If a graph is locally finite at a vertex, then so is a subgraph of that graph. -/
instance finiteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [DecidableRel G'.Adj]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G.neighborSet v) (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
/-- If a subgraph is locally finite at a vertex, then so are subgraphs of that subgraph.
This is not an instance because `G''` cannot be inferred. -/
def finiteAtOfSubgraph {G' G'' : Subgraph G} [DecidableRel G'.Adj] (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : G'.verts)
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G''.neighborSet v) (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
instance (G' : Subgraph G) [Fintype G'.verts] (v : V) [DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset G'.verts (neighborSet_subset_verts G' v)
instance coeFiniteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (coeNeighborSetEquiv v).symm
theorem IsSpanning.card_verts [Fintype V] {G' : Subgraph G} [Fintype G'.verts] (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.verts.toFinset.card = Fintype.card V := by
simp only [isSpanning_iff.1 h, Set.toFinset_univ]
congr
/-- The degree of a vertex in a subgraph. It's zero for vertices outside the subgraph. -/
def degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : ℕ :=
Fintype.card (G'.neighborSet v)
theorem finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
(G'.neighborSet v).toFinset.card = G'.degree v := by
rw [degree, Set.toFinset_card]
theorem degree_le (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
theorem degree_le' (G' G'' : Subgraph G) (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G''.degree v :=
Set.card_le_card (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
@[simp]
theorem coe_degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : G'.coe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Fintype.card_congr (coeNeighborSetEquiv v)
@[simp]
theorem degree_spanningCoe {G' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.spanningCoe.neighborSet v)] : G'.spanningCoe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Subgraph.degree]
congr!
theorem degree_eq_one_iff_unique_adj {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
G'.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃! w : V, G'.Adj v w := by
rw [← finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Finset.card_eq_one, Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem]
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, mem_neighborSet]
lemma neighborSet_eq_of_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
H.neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := by
lift H.neighborSet v to Finset V using h.set_finite_iff.mp hfin with s hs
lift G.neighborSet v to Finset V using hfin with t ht
refine congrArg _ <| Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le ?_ (Finset.card_eq_of_equiv h).le
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, hs, ht]
exact H.neighborSet_subset _
lemma adj_iff_of_neighborSet_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
∀ {w}, H.Adj v w ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (neighborSet_eq_of_equiv h hfin) _
end Subgraph
section MkProperties
/-! ### Properties of `singletonSubgraph` and `subgraphOfAdj` -/
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph W}
instance nonempty_singletonSubgraph_verts (v : V) : Nonempty (G.singletonSubgraph v).verts :=
⟨⟨v, Set.mem_singleton v⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singletonSubgraph_le_iff (v : V) (H : G.Subgraph) :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ H ↔ v ∈ H.verts := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.1 (Set.mem_singleton v), ?_⟩
intro h
constructor
· rwa [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
· exact fun _ _ ↦ False.elim
@[simp]
theorem map_singletonSubgraph (f : G →g G') {v : V} :
Subgraph.map f (G.singletonSubgraph v) = G'.singletonSubgraph (f v) := by
ext <;> simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply,
exists_and_left, and_iff_left_iff_imp, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Subgraph.map_verts,
singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.image_singleton]
exact False.elim
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_singletonSubgraph (v w : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).neighborSet w = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_singletonSubgraph (v : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
theorem eq_singletonSubgraph_iff_verts_eq (H : G.Subgraph) {v : V} :
H = G.singletonSubgraph v ↔ H.verts = {v} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts], fun h ↦ ?_⟩
ext
· rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts]
· simp only [Prop.bot_eq_false, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply, iff_false]
intro ha
have ha1 := ha.fst_mem
have ha2 := ha.snd_mem
rw [h, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha1 ha2
subst_vars
exact ha.ne rfl
instance nonempty_subgraphOfAdj_verts {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Nonempty (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).verts :=
⟨⟨v, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).edgeSet = {s(v, w)} := by
ext e
refine e.ind ?_
simp only [eq_comm, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subgraph.mem_edgeSet, subgraphOfAdj_adj,
forall₂_true_iff]
lemma subgraphOfAdj_le_of_adj {v w : V} (H : G.Subgraph) (h : H.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj (H.adj_sub h) ≤ H := by
constructor
· intro x
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
· simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
rintro _ _ (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩) <;> simp [h, h.symm]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_symm {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm = G.subgraphOfAdj hvw := by
ext <;> simp [or_comm, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem map_subgraphOfAdj (f : G →g G') {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Subgraph.map f (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw) = G'.subgraphOfAdj (f.map_adj hvw) := by
ext
· simp only [Subgraph.map_verts, subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_insert_iff,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl | rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· use v
simp
· use w
simp
· simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· use v, w
simp
· use w, v
simp
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_subset {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u ⊆ {v, w} :=
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet_subset_verts _
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet v = {w} := by
ext u
suffices w = u ↔ u = w by simpa [hvw.ne.symm] using this
rw [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_snd_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet w = {v} := by
rw [subgraphOfAdj_symm hvw.symm]
exact neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_of_ne_of_ne {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) (hv : u ≠ v)
(hw : u ≠ w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u = ∅ := by
ext
simp [hv.symm, hw.symm]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u =
(if u = v then {w} else ∅) ∪ if u = w then {v} else ∅ := by
split_ifs <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
theorem singletonSubgraph_fst_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph u ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
theorem singletonSubgraph_snd_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
@[simp]
lemma support_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj h).support = {u , v} := by
ext
rw [Subgraph.mem_support]
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.elim (fun hl ↦ ⟨v, .inl ⟨hl.symm, rfl⟩⟩) fun hr ↦ ⟨u, .inr ⟨rfl, hr.symm⟩⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, hw⟩
exact hw.elim (fun h1 ↦ .inl h1.1.symm) fun hr ↦ .inr hr.2.symm
end MkProperties
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V}
/-! ### Subgraphs of subgraphs -/
/-- Given a subgraph of a subgraph of `G`, construct a subgraph of `G`. -/
protected abbrev coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.map G'.hom
/-- Given a subgraph of `G`, restrict it to being a subgraph of another subgraph `G'` by
taking the portion of `G` that intersects `G'`. -/
protected abbrev restrict {G' : G.Subgraph} : G.Subgraph → G'.coe.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.comap G'.hom
@[simp]
lemma verts_coeSubgraph {G' : Subgraph G} (G'' : Subgraph G'.coe) :
(Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'').verts = (G''.verts : Set V) := rfl
lemma coeSubgraph_adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) (v w : V) :
(G'.coeSubgraph G'').Adj v w ↔
∃ (hv : v ∈ G'.verts) (hw : w ∈ G'.verts), G''.Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
simp [Relation.Map]
lemma restrict_adj {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} (v w : G'.verts) :
(G'.restrict G'').Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ G''.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem restrict_coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.restrict (Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'') = G'' := by
ext
· simp
· rw [restrict_adj, coeSubgraph_adj]
simpa using G''.adj_sub
theorem coeSubgraph_injective (G' : G.Subgraph) :
Function.Injective (Subgraph.coeSubgraph : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective restrict_coeSubgraph
lemma coeSubgraph_le {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : H.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph H' ≤ H := by
constructor
· simp
· rintro v w ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact H'.adj_sub h
lemma coeSubgraph_restrict_eq {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : G.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph (H.restrict H') = H ⊓ H' := by
ext
· simp [and_comm]
· simp_rw [coeSubgraph_adj, restrict_adj]
simp only [exists_and_left, exists_prop, inf_adj, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
/-! ### Edge deletion -/
/-- Given a subgraph `G'` and a set of vertex pairs, remove all of the corresponding edges
from its edge set, if present.
See also: `SimpleGraph.deleteEdges`. -/
def deleteEdges (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) : G.Subgraph where
verts := G'.verts
Adj := G'.Adj \ Sym2.ToRel s
adj_sub h' := G'.adj_sub h'.1
edge_vert h' := G'.edge_vert h'.1
symm a b := by simp [G'.adj_comm, Sym2.eq_swap]
section DeleteEdges
variable {G' : G.Subgraph} (s : Set (Sym2 V))
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_verts : (G'.deleteEdges s).verts = G'.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_adj (v w : V) : (G'.deleteEdges s).Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ ¬s(v, w) ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_deleteEdges (s s' : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).deleteEdges s' = G'.deleteEdges (s ∪ s') := by
ext <;> simp [and_assoc, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_empty_eq : G'.deleteEdges ∅ = G' := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_spanningCoe_eq :
G'.spanningCoe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe := by
ext
simp
theorem deleteEdges_coe_eq (s : Set (Sym2 G'.verts)) :
G'.coe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) '' s)).coe := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_adj, coe_adj, deleteEdges_adj, Set.mem_image, not_exists,
not_and, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor
· intro hs
refine Sym2.ind ?_
rintro ⟨v', hv'⟩ ⟨w', hw'⟩
simp only [Sym2.map_pair_eq, Sym2.eq]
contrapose!
rintro (_ | _) <;> simpa only [Sym2.eq_swap]
· intro h' hs
exact h' _ hs rfl
theorem coe_deleteEdges_eq (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).coe = G'.coe.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' s) := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp
theorem deleteEdges_le : G'.deleteEdges s ≤ G' := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [subset_rfl]
theorem deleteEdges_le_of_le {s s' : Set (Sym2 V)} (h : s ⊆ s') :
G'.deleteEdges s' ≤ G'.deleteEdges s := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual only [deleteEdges_verts, deleteEdges_adj,
true_and, and_imp, subset_rfl]
exact fun _ _ _ hs' hs ↦ hs' (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_left_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (G'.edgeSet ∩ s) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_right_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (s ∩ G'.edgeSet) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
theorem coe_deleteEdges_le : (G'.deleteEdges s).coe ≤ (G'.coe : SimpleGraph G'.verts) := by
intro v w
simp +contextual
theorem spanningCoe_deleteEdges_le (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe ≤ G'.spanningCoe :=
spanningCoe_le_of_le (deleteEdges_le s)
end DeleteEdges
/-! ### Induced subgraphs -/
/- Given a subgraph, we can change its vertex set while removing any invalid edges, which
gives induced subgraphs. See also `SimpleGraph.induce` for the `SimpleGraph` version, which,
unlike for subgraphs, results in a graph with a different vertex type. -/
/-- The induced subgraph of a subgraph. The expectation is that `s ⊆ G'.verts` for the usual
notion of an induced subgraph, but, in general, `s` is taken to be the new vertex set and edges
are induced from the subgraph `G'`. -/
@[simps]
def induce (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := s
Adj u v := u ∈ s ∧ v ∈ s ∧ G'.Adj u v
adj_sub h := G'.adj_sub h.2.2
edge_vert h := h.1
symm _ _ h := ⟨h.2.1, h.1, G'.symm h.2.2⟩
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.induce_eq_coe_induce_top (s : Set V) :
G.induce s = ((⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce s).coe := by
ext
simp
section Induce
variable {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} {s s' : Set V}
theorem induce_mono (hg : G' ≤ G'') (hs : s ⊆ s') : G'.induce s ≤ G''.induce s' := by
constructor
· simp [hs]
· simp +contextual only [induce_adj, and_imp]
intro v w hv hw ha
exact ⟨hs hv, hs hw, hg.2 ha⟩
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem induce_mono_left (hg : G' ≤ G'') : G'.induce s ≤ G''.induce s :=
induce_mono hg subset_rfl
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem induce_mono_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : G'.induce s ≤ G'.induce s' :=
induce_mono le_rfl hs
@[simp]
theorem induce_empty : G'.induce ∅ = ⊥ := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem induce_self_verts : G'.induce G'.verts = G' := by
ext
· simp
· constructor <;>
simp +contextual only [induce_adj, imp_true_iff, and_true]
exact fun ha ↦ ⟨G'.edge_vert ha, G'.edge_vert ha.symm⟩
lemma le_induce_top_verts : G' ≤ (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce G'.verts :=
calc G' = G'.induce G'.verts := Subgraph.induce_self_verts.symm
_ ≤ (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce G'.verts := Subgraph.induce_mono_left le_top
lemma le_induce_union : G'.induce s ⊔ G'.induce s' ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
constructor
· simp only [verts_sup, induce_verts, Set.Subset.rfl]
· simp only [sup_adj, induce_adj, Set.mem_union]
rintro v w (h | h) <;> simp [h]
lemma le_induce_union_left : G'.induce s ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
exact (sup_le_iff.mp le_induce_union).1
lemma le_induce_union_right : G'.induce s' ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
exact (sup_le_iff.mp le_induce_union).2
theorem singletonSubgraph_eq_induce {v : V} :
G.singletonSubgraph v = (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {v} := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [-Set.bot_eq_empty, Prop.bot_eq_false]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_eq_induce {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj hvw = (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {v, w} := by
ext
· simp
· constructor
· intro h
| simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff] at h
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h <;> simp [hvw, hvw.symm]
· intro h
simp only [induce_adj, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, top_adj] at h
obtain ⟨rfl | rfl, rfl | rfl, ha⟩ := h <;> first |exact (ha.ne rfl).elim|simp
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 1,194 | 1,199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Sean Leather
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Instances
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Lemmas
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Endomorphism
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Types
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.KleisliCat
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# List folds generalized to `Traversable`
Informally, we can think of `foldl` as a special case of `traverse` where we do not care about the
reconstructed data structure and, in a state monad, we care about the final state.
The obvious way to define `foldl` would be to use the state monad but it
is nicer to reason about a more abstract interface with `foldMap` as a
primitive and `foldMap_hom` as a defining property.
```
def foldMap {α ω} [One ω] [Mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω := ...
lemma foldMap_hom (α β) [Monoid α] [Monoid β] (f : α →* β) (g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (foldMap g x) = foldMap (f ∘ g) x :=
...
```
`foldMap` uses a monoid ω to accumulate a value for every element of
a data structure and `foldMap_hom` uses a monoid homomorphism to
substitute the monoid used by `foldMap`. The two are sufficient to
define `foldl`, `foldr` and `toList`. `toList` permits the
formulation of specifications in terms of operations on lists.
Each fold function can be defined using a specialized
monoid. `toList` uses a free monoid represented as a list with
concatenation while `foldl` uses endofunctions together with function
composition.
The definition through monoids uses `traverse` together with the
applicative functor `const m` (where `m` is the monoid). As an
implementation, `const` guarantees that no resource is spent on
reconstructing the structure during traversal.
A special class could be defined for `foldable`, similarly to Haskell,
but the author cannot think of instances of `foldable` that are not also
`Traversable`.
-/
universe u v
open ULift CategoryTheory MulOpposite
namespace Monoid
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m]
variable {α β : Type u}
/-- For a list, foldl f x [y₀,y₁] reduces as follows:
```
calc foldl f x [y₀,y₁]
= foldl f (f x y₀) [y₁] : rfl
... = foldl f (f (f x y₀) y₁) [] : rfl
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
```
with
```
f : α → β → α
x : α
[y₀,y₁] : List β
```
We can view the above as a composition of functions:
```
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
... = flip f y₁ (flip f y₀ x) : rfl
... = (flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀) x : rfl
```
We can use traverse and const to construct this composition:
```
calc const.run (traverse (fun y ↦ const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₀,y₁]) x
= const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*>
traverse (fun y ↦ const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₁]) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*>
( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> traverse (fun y ↦ const.mk' (flip f y)) [] )) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*>
( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure [] )) x
... = const.run ( ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure []) ∘
((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀)) ) x
... = const.run ( const.mk' (flip f y₁) ∘ const.mk' (flip f y₀) ) x
... = const.run ( flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀ ) x
... = f (f x y₀) y₁
```
And this is how `const` turns a monoid into an applicative functor and
how the monoid of endofunctions define `Foldl`.
-/
abbrev Foldl (α : Type u) : Type u :=
(End α)ᵐᵒᵖ
def Foldl.mk (f : α → α) : Foldl α :=
op f
def Foldl.get (x : Foldl α) : α → α :=
unop x
@[simps]
def Foldl.ofFreeMonoid (f : β → α → β) : FreeMonoid α →* Monoid.Foldl β where
toFun xs := op <| flip (List.foldl f) (FreeMonoid.toList xs)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by
intros
simp only [FreeMonoid.toList_mul, unop_op, List.foldl_append, op_inj, Function.flip_def]
rfl
abbrev Foldr (α : Type u) : Type u :=
End α
def Foldr.mk (f : α → α) : Foldr α :=
f
def Foldr.get (x : Foldr α) : α → α :=
x
@[simps]
def Foldr.ofFreeMonoid (f : α → β → β) : FreeMonoid α →* Monoid.Foldr β where
toFun xs := flip (List.foldr f) (FreeMonoid.toList xs)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := funext fun _ => List.foldr_append
abbrev foldlM (m : Type u → Type u) [Monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u :=
MulOpposite <| End <| KleisliCat.mk m α
def foldlM.mk (f : α → m α) : foldlM m α :=
op f
def foldlM.get (x : foldlM m α) : α → m α :=
unop x
@[simps]
def foldlM.ofFreeMonoid [LawfulMonad m] (f : β → α → m β) : FreeMonoid α →* Monoid.foldlM m β where
toFun xs := op <| flip (List.foldlM f) (FreeMonoid.toList xs)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; apply unop_injective; funext; apply List.foldlM_append
abbrev foldrM (m : Type u → Type u) [Monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u :=
End <| KleisliCat.mk m α
def foldrM.mk (f : α → m α) : foldrM m α :=
f
def foldrM.get (x : foldrM m α) : α → m α :=
x
@[simps]
def foldrM.ofFreeMonoid [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β → m β) : FreeMonoid α →* Monoid.foldrM m β where
toFun xs := flip (List.foldrM f) (FreeMonoid.toList xs)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; funext; apply List.foldrM_append
end Monoid
namespace Traversable
open Monoid Functor
section Defs
variable {α β : Type u} {t : Type u → Type u} [Traversable t]
def foldMap {α ω} [One ω] [Mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω :=
traverse (Const.mk' ∘ f)
def foldl (f : α → β → α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : α :=
(foldMap (Foldl.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : β :=
(foldMap (Foldr.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
/-- Conceptually, `toList` collects all the elements of a collection
in a list. This idea is formalized by
`lemma toList_spec (x : t α) : toList x = foldMap FreeMonoid.mk x`.
The definition of `toList` is based on `foldl` and `List.cons` for
speed. It is faster than using `foldMap FreeMonoid.mk` because, by
using `foldl` and `List.cons`, each insertion is done in constant
time. As a consequence, `toList` performs in linear.
On the other hand, `foldMap FreeMonoid.mk` creates a singleton list
around each element and concatenates all the resulting lists. In
`xs ++ ys`, concatenation takes a time proportional to `length xs`. Since
the order in which concatenation is evaluated is unspecified, nothing
prevents each element of the traversable to be appended at the end
`xs ++ [x]` which would yield a `O(n²)` run time. -/
def toList : t α → List α :=
List.reverse ∘ foldl (flip List.cons) []
def length (xs : t α) : ℕ :=
down <| foldl (fun l _ => up <| l.down + 1) (up 0) xs
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m]
def foldlm (f : α → β → m α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : m α :=
(foldMap (foldlM.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def foldrm (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : m β :=
(foldMap (foldrM.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
end Defs
section ApplicativeTransformation
variable {α β γ : Type u}
open Function hiding const
def mapFold [Monoid α] [Monoid β] (f : α →* β) : ApplicativeTransformation (Const α) (Const β) where
app _ := f
preserves_seq' := by intros; simp only [Seq.seq, map_mul]
preserves_pure' := by intros; simp only [map_one, pure]
theorem Free.map_eq_map (f : α → β) (xs : List α) :
f <$> xs = (FreeMonoid.toList (FreeMonoid.map f (FreeMonoid.ofList xs))) :=
rfl
theorem foldl.unop_ofFreeMonoid (f : β → α → β) (xs : FreeMonoid α) (a : β) :
unop (Foldl.ofFreeMonoid f xs) a = List.foldl f a (FreeMonoid.toList xs) :=
rfl
variable {t : Type u → Type u} [Traversable t] [LawfulTraversable t]
open LawfulTraversable
theorem foldMap_hom [Monoid α] [Monoid β] (f : α →* β) (g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (foldMap g x) = foldMap (f ∘ g) x :=
calc
f (foldMap g x) = f (traverse (Const.mk' ∘ g) x) := rfl
_ = (mapFold f).app _ (traverse (Const.mk' ∘ g) x) := rfl
_ = traverse ((mapFold f).app _ ∘ Const.mk' ∘ g) x := naturality (mapFold f) _ _
_ = foldMap (f ∘ g) x := rfl
theorem foldMap_hom_free [Monoid β] (f : FreeMonoid α →* β) (x : t α) :
f (foldMap FreeMonoid.of x) = foldMap (f ∘ FreeMonoid.of) x :=
foldMap_hom f _ x
end ApplicativeTransformation
section Equalities
open LawfulTraversable
open List (cons)
variable {α β γ : Type u}
variable {t : Type u → Type u} [Traversable t] [LawfulTraversable t]
@[simp]
theorem foldl.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of (f : α → β → α) :
Foldl.ofFreeMonoid f ∘ FreeMonoid.of = Foldl.mk ∘ flip f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of (f : β → α → α) :
Foldr.ofFreeMonoid f ∘ FreeMonoid.of = Foldr.mk ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldlm.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of {m} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β → m α) :
foldlM.ofFreeMonoid f ∘ FreeMonoid.of = foldlM.mk ∘ flip f := by
ext1 x
simp only [foldlM.ofFreeMonoid, Function.flip_def, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk,
Function.comp_apply, FreeMonoid.toList_of, List.foldlM_cons, List.foldlM_nil, bind_pure,
foldlM.mk, op_inj]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldrm.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of {m} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : β → α → m α) :
foldrM.ofFreeMonoid f ∘ FreeMonoid.of = foldrM.mk ∘ f := by
ext
simp [(· ∘ ·), foldrM.ofFreeMonoid, foldrM.mk, Function.flip_def]
theorem toList_spec (xs : t α) : toList xs = FreeMonoid.toList (foldMap FreeMonoid.of xs) :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
FreeMonoid.toList (foldMap FreeMonoid.of xs) =
FreeMonoid.toList (foldMap FreeMonoid.of xs).reverse.reverse := by
simp only [FreeMonoid.reverse_reverse]
_ = (List.foldr cons [] (foldMap FreeMonoid.of xs).toList.reverse).reverse := by simp
_ = (unop (Foldl.ofFreeMonoid (flip cons) (foldMap FreeMonoid.of xs)) []).reverse := by
simp [Function.flip_def, List.foldr_reverse, Foldl.ofFreeMonoid, unop_op]
_ = toList xs := by
rw [foldMap_hom_free (Foldl.ofFreeMonoid (flip <| @cons α))]
simp only [toList, foldl, List.reverse_inj, Foldl.get, foldl.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem foldMap_map [Monoid γ] (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (xs : t α) :
foldMap g (f <$> xs) = foldMap (g ∘ f) xs := by
simp only [foldMap, traverse_map, Function.comp_def]
theorem foldl_toList (f : α → β → α) (xs : t β) (x : α) :
foldl f x xs = List.foldl f x (toList xs) := by
rw [← FreeMonoid.toList_ofList (toList xs), ← foldl.unop_ofFreeMonoid]
simp only [foldl, toList_spec, foldMap_hom_free, foldl.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of, Foldl.get,
FreeMonoid.ofList_toList]
theorem foldr_toList (f : α → β → β) (xs : t α) (x : β) :
foldr f x xs = List.foldr f x (toList xs) := by
change _ = Foldr.ofFreeMonoid _ (FreeMonoid.ofList <| toList xs) _
rw [toList_spec, foldr, Foldr.get, FreeMonoid.ofList_toList, foldMap_hom_free,
foldr.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of]
theorem toList_map (f : α → β) (xs : t α) : toList (f <$> xs) = f <$> toList xs := by
simp only [toList_spec, Free.map_eq_map, foldMap_hom, foldMap_map, FreeMonoid.ofList_toList,
FreeMonoid.map_of, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldl f a (g <$> l) = foldl (fun x y => f x (g y)) a l := by
simp only [foldl, foldMap_map, Function.comp_def, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldr f a (g <$> l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l := by
simp only [foldr, foldMap_map, Function.comp_def, flip]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_self {xs : List α} : toList xs = xs := by
simp only [toList_spec, foldMap, traverse]
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => (conv_rhs => rw [← ih]); rfl
theorem length_toList {xs : t α} : length xs = List.length (toList xs) := by
unfold length
rw [foldl_toList]
generalize toList xs = ys
rw [← Nat.add_zero ys.length]
generalize 0 = n
induction ys generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp +arith [ih]
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldlm_toList {f : α → β → m α} {x : α} {xs : t β} :
foldlm f x xs = List.foldlM f x (toList xs) :=
calc foldlm f x xs
_ = unop (foldlM.ofFreeMonoid f (FreeMonoid.ofList <| toList xs)) x := by
simp only [foldlm, toList_spec, foldMap_hom_free (foldlM.ofFreeMonoid f),
foldlm.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of, foldlM.get, FreeMonoid.ofList_toList]
_ = List.foldlM f x (toList xs) := by simp [foldlM.ofFreeMonoid, unop_op, flip]
theorem foldrm_toList (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) :
foldrm f x xs = List.foldrM f x (toList xs) := by
change _ = foldrM.ofFreeMonoid f (FreeMonoid.ofList <| toList xs) x
simp only [foldrm, toList_spec, foldMap_hom_free (foldrM.ofFreeMonoid f),
foldrm.ofFreeMonoid_comp_of, foldrM.get, FreeMonoid.ofList_toList]
@[simp]
theorem foldlm_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldlm f a (g <$> l) = foldlm (fun x y => f x (g y)) a l := by
simp only [foldlm, foldMap_map, Function.comp_def, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem foldrm_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldrm f a (g <$> l) = foldrm (f ∘ g) a l := by
simp only [foldrm, foldMap_map, Function.comp_def, flip]
end Equalities
end Traversable
| Mathlib/Control/Fold.lean | 418 | 422 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
| coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 402 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject.Unitor
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
/-!
# The monoidal category structures on graded objects
Assuming that `C` is a monoidal category and that `I` is an additive monoid,
we introduce a partially defined tensor product on the category `GradedObject I C`:
given `X₁` and `X₂` two objects in `GradedObject I C`, we define
`GradedObject.Monoidal.tensorObj X₁ X₂` under the assumption `HasTensor X₁ X₂`
that the coproduct of `X₁ i ⊗ X₂ j` for `i + j = n` exists for any `n : I`.
Under suitable assumptions about the existence of coproducts and the
preservation of certain coproducts by the tensor products in `C`, we
obtain a monoidal category structure on `GradedObject I C`.
In particular, if `C` has finite coproducts to which the tensor
product commutes, we obtain a monoidal category structure on `GradedObject ℕ C`.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits MonoidalCategory Category
variable {I : Type u} [AddMonoid I] {C : Type*} [Category C] [MonoidalCategory C]
namespace GradedObject
/-- The tensor product of two graded objects `X₁` and `X₂` exists if for any `n`,
the coproduct of the objects `X₁ i ⊗ X₂ j` for `i + j = n` exists. -/
abbrev HasTensor (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) : Prop :=
HasMap (((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj X₁).obj X₂) (fun ⟨i, j⟩ => i + j)
lemma hasTensor_of_iso {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C}
(e₁ : X₁ ≅ Y₁) (e₂ : X₂ ≅ Y₂) [HasTensor X₁ X₂] :
HasTensor Y₁ Y₂ := by
let e : ((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj X₁).obj X₂ ≅
((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj Y₁).obj Y₂ := isoMk _ _
(fun ⟨i, j⟩ ↦ (eval i).mapIso e₁ ⊗ (eval j).mapIso e₂)
exact hasMap_of_iso e _
namespace Monoidal
/-- The tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable abbrev tensorObj (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) [HasTensor X₁ X₂] :
GradedObject I C :=
mapBifunctorMapObj (curriedTensor C) (fun ⟨i, j⟩ => i + j) X₁ X₂
section
variable (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) [HasTensor X₁ X₂]
/-- The inclusion of a summand in a tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable def ιTensorObj (i₁ i₂ i₁₂ : I) (h : i₁ + i₂ = i₁₂) :
X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ tensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁₂ :=
ιMapBifunctorMapObj (curriedTensor C) _ _ _ _ _ _ h
variable {X₁ X₂}
@[ext]
lemma tensorObj_ext {A : C} {j : I} (f g : tensorObj X₁ X₂ j ⟶ A)
(h : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (hi : i₁ + i₂ = j),
ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ j hi ≫ f = ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ j hi ≫ g) : f = g := by
apply mapObj_ext
rintro ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ hi
exact h i₁ i₂ hi
/-- Constructor for morphisms from a tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable def tensorObjDesc {A : C} {k : I}
(f : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (_ : i₁ + i₂ = k), X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ A) : tensorObj X₁ X₂ k ⟶ A :=
mapBifunctorMapObjDesc f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_tensorObjDesc {A : C} {k : I}
(f : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (_ : i₁ + i₂ = k), X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ A) (i₁ i₂ : I) (hi : i₁ + i₂ = k) :
ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ k hi ≫ tensorObjDesc f = f i₁ i₂ hi := by
apply ι_mapBifunctorMapObjDesc
end
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X₁ Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y₂` induced by morphisms of graded
objects `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂`. -/
noncomputable def tensorHom {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X₁ Y₁] [HasTensor X₂ Y₂] :
tensorObj X₁ Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y₂ :=
mapBifunctorMapMap _ _ f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_tensorHom {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X₁ Y₁] [HasTensor X₂ Y₂] (i₁ i₂ i₁₂ : I) (h : i₁ + i₂ = i₁₂) :
ιTensorObj X₁ Y₁ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h ≫ tensorHom f g i₁₂ =
(f i₁ ⊗ g i₂) ≫ ιTensorObj X₂ Y₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h := by
rw [MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def, assoc]
apply ι_mapBifunctorMapMap
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂` induced by a morphism of graded objects
`φ : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂`. -/
noncomputable abbrev whiskerLeft (X : GradedObject I C) {Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (φ : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X Y₁] [HasTensor X Y₂] : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂ :=
| tensorHom (𝟙 X) φ
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y` induced by a morphism of graded objects
`φ : X₁ ⟶ X₂`. -/
noncomputable abbrev whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C} (φ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : GradedObject I C)
[HasTensor X₁ Y] [HasTensor X₂ Y] : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y :=
tensorHom φ (𝟙 Y)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GradedObject/Monoidal.lean | 107 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Order properties of cast of integers
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`),
particularly results involving algebraic homomorphisms or the order structure on `ℤ`
which were not available in the import dependencies of `Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Basic`.
## TODO
Move order lemmas about `Nat.cast`, `Rat.cast`, `NNRat.cast` here.
-/
open Function Nat
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Int
section OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftMono R]
variable [ZeroLEOneClass R]
lemma cast_mono : Monotone (Int.cast : ℤ → R) := by
intro m n h
rw [← sub_nonneg] at h
lift n - m to ℕ using h with k hk
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, ← hk, cast_natCast]
exact k.cast_nonneg'
@[gcongr] protected lemma GCongr.intCast_mono {m n : ℤ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : (m : R) ≤ n := cast_mono hmn
variable [NeZero (1 : R)] {m n : ℤ}
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : ∀ {n : ℤ}, (0 : R) ≤ n ↔ 0 ≤ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp
| -[n+1] => by
have : -(n : R) < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) zero_lt_one
simpa [(negSucc_lt_zero n).not_le, ← sub_eq_add_neg, le_neg] using this.not_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (m : R) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, cast_nonneg, sub_nonneg]
lemma cast_strictMono : StrictMono (fun x : ℤ => (x : R)) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => cast_le.symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (m : R) < n ↔ m < n := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.intCast_strictMono⟩ := Int.cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (n : R) ≤ 0 ↔ n ≤ 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_le]
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : R) < n ↔ 0 < n := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (n : R) < 0 ↔ n < 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
| end OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Cast.lean | 66 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
| /-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 497 | 500 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Laurent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials
We give methods for computing coefficients of the characteristic polynomial.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.charpoly_degree_eq_dim` proves that the degree of the characteristic polynomial
over a nonzero ring is the dimension of the matrix
- `Matrix.det_eq_sign_charpoly_coeff` proves that the determinant is the constant term of the
characteristic polynomial, up to sign.
- `Matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff` proves that the trace is the negative of the (d-1)th
coefficient of the characteristic polynomial, where d is the dimension of the matrix.
For a nonzero ring, this is the second-highest coefficient.
- `Matrix.charpolyRev` the reverse of the characteristic polynomial.
- `Matrix.reverse_charpoly` characterises the reverse of the characteristic polynomial.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w z
open Finset Matrix Polynomial
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {n G : Type v} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable {α β : Type v} [DecidableEq α]
variable {M : Matrix n n R}
namespace Matrix
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree [Nontrivial R] (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree = ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h, ← degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.succ_pos 0)]
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree ≤ ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, natDegree_X_le]
variable (M)
theorem charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt :
(M.charpoly - ∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree < ↑(Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly, det_apply', ← insert_erase (mem_univ (Equiv.refl n)),
sum_insert (not_mem_erase (Equiv.refl n) univ), add_comm]
simp only [charmatrix_apply_eq, one_mul, Equiv.Perm.sign_refl, id, Int.cast_one,
Units.val_one, add_sub_cancel_right, Equiv.coe_refl]
rw [← mem_degreeLT]
apply Submodule.sum_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1))
intro c hc; rw [← C_eq_intCast, C_mul']
apply Submodule.smul_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1)) ↑↑(Equiv.Perm.sign c)
rw [mem_degreeLT]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree _
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one (ne_of_mem_erase hc))
apply le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le univ fun i : n => charmatrix M (c i) i) _
rw [card_eq_sum_ones]; rw [sum_filter]; apply sum_le_sum
intros
apply charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le
theorem charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le {k : ℕ} (h : Fintype.card n - 1 ≤ k) :
M.charpoly.coeff k = (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).coeff k := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero; rw [← coeff_sub]
apply Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_le]; apply h
theorem det_of_card_zero (h : Fintype.card n = 0) (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at h
suffices M = 1 by simp [this]
ext i
exact h.elim i
theorem charpoly_degree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.degree = Fintype.card n := by
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [h]
unfold charpoly
rw [det_of_card_zero]
· simp
· assumption
rw [← sub_add_cancel M.charpoly (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i)))]
-- Porting note: added `↑` in front of `Fintype.card n`
have h1 : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree = ↑(Fintype.card n) := by
rw [degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h), natDegree_prod']
· simp_rw [natDegree_X_sub_C]
rw [← Finset.card_univ, sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
simp_rw [(monic_X_sub_C _).leadingCoeff]
simp
rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt]
· exact h1
rw [h1]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
@[simp] theorem charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.natDegree = Fintype.card n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (charpoly_degree_eq_dim M)
theorem charpoly_monic (M : Matrix n n R) : M.charpoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [charpoly, det_of_card_zero h]
apply monic_one
have mon : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic univ fun i : n => X - C (M i i)
simp [monic_X_sub_C]
rw [← sub_add_cancel (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))) M.charpoly] at mon
rw [Monic] at *
| rwa [leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt] at mon
rw [charpoly_degree_eq_dim]
rw [← neg_sub]
rw [degree_neg]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
/-- See also `Matrix.coeff_charpolyRev_eq_neg_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff [Nonempty n] (M : Matrix n n R) :
trace M = -M.charpoly.coeff (Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le _ le_rfl, Fintype.card,
prod_X_sub_C_coeff_card_pred univ (fun i : n => M i i) Fintype.card_pos, neg_neg, trace]
simp_rw [diag_apply]
theorem matPolyEquiv_symm_map_eval (M : (Matrix n n R)[X]) (r : R) :
(matPolyEquiv.symm M).map (eval r) = M.eval (scalar n r) := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Coeff.lean | 127 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
/-!
# Complements
In this file we define the complement of a subgroup.
## Main definitions
- `Subgroup.IsComplement S T` where `S` and `T` are subsets of `G` states that every `g : G` can be
written uniquely as a product `s * t` for `s ∈ S`, `t ∈ T`.
- `H.LeftTransversal` where `H` is a subgroup of `G` is the type of all left-complements of `H`,
i.e. the set of all `S : Set G` that contain exactly one element of each left coset of `H`.
- `H.RightTransversal` where `H` is a subgroup of `G` is the set of all right-complements of `H`,
i.e. the set of all `T : Set G` that contain exactly one element of each right coset of `H`.
## Main results
- `isComplement'_of_coprime` : Subgroups of coprime order are complements.
-/
open Function Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H K : Subgroup G) (S T : Set G)
/-- `S` and `T` are complements if `(*) : S × T → G` is a bijection.
This notion generalizes left transversals, right transversals, and complementary subgroups. -/
@[to_additive "`S` and `T` are complements if `(+) : S × T → G` is a bijection"]
def IsComplement : Prop :=
Function.Bijective fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1
/-- `H` and `K` are complements if `(*) : H × K → G` is a bijection -/
@[to_additive "`H` and `K` are complements if `(+) : H × K → G` is a bijection"]
abbrev IsComplement' :=
IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G)
/-- The set of left-complements of `T : Set G` -/
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement (since := "2024-12-18"))
"The set of left-complements of `T : Set G`"]
def leftTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ S : Set G | IsComplement S T }
/-- The set of right-complements of `S : Set G` -/
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement (since := "2024-12-18"))
"The set of right-complements of `S : Set G`"]
def rightTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ T : Set G | IsComplement S T }
variable {H K S T}
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_def : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G) :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_iff_existsUnique :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique _
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement.existsUnique (h : IsComplement S T) (g : G) :
∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
isComplement_iff_existsUnique.mp h g
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement'.symm (h : IsComplement' H K) : IsComplement' K H := by
let ϕ : H × K ≃ K × H :=
Equiv.mk (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩) (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩)
(fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)) fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)
let ψ : G ≃ G := Equiv.mk (fun g : G => g⁻¹) (fun g : G => g⁻¹) inv_inv inv_inv
suffices hf : (ψ ∘ fun x : H × K => x.1.1 * x.2.1) = (fun x : K × H => x.1.1 * x.2.1) ∘ ϕ by
rw [isComplement'_def, IsComplement, ← Equiv.bijective_comp ϕ]
apply (congr_arg Function.Bijective hf).mp -- Porting note: This was a `rw` in mathlib3
rwa [ψ.comp_bijective]
exact funext fun x => mul_inv_rev _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_comm : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement' K H :=
⟨IsComplement'.symm, IsComplement'.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_singleton {g : G} : IsComplement (univ : Set G) {g} :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ h => Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (mul_right_cancel h)) rfl, fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨x * g⁻¹, ⟨⟩⟩, g, rfl⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right x g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_univ {g : G} : IsComplement ({g} : Set G) univ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ h => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext (mul_left_cancel h)), fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨g, rfl⟩, g⁻¹ * x, ⟨⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left g x⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_left {g : G} : IsComplement {g} S ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => (congr_arg _ h).mpr isComplement_singleton_univ⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟨z, rfl : z = g⟩, y, _⟩, hy⟩ := h.2 (g * x)
rwa [← mul_left_cancel hy]
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_right {g : G} : IsComplement S {g} ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => h ▸ isComplement_univ_singleton⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h.2 (x * g)
conv_rhs at hy => rw [← show y.2.1 = g from y.2.2]
rw [← mul_right_cancel hy]
exact y.1.2
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_left : IsComplement univ S ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.2.1, a.2.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩ : (⊤ : Set G) × S) = ⟨⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((inv_mul_cancel a).trans (inv_mul_cancel b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).2
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_right : IsComplement S univ ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.1.1, a.1.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩⟩ : S × (⊤ : Set G)) = ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((mul_inv_cancel a).trans (mul_inv_cancel b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).1
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.mul_eq (h : IsComplement S T) : S * T = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x ↦ by simpa [mem_mul] using (h.existsUnique x).exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma not_isComplement_empty_left : ¬ IsComplement ∅ T :=
fun h ↦ by simpa [eq_comm (a := ∅)] using h.mul_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma not_isComplement_empty_right : ¬ IsComplement S ∅ :=
fun h ↦ by simpa [eq_comm (a := ∅)] using h.mul_eq
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.nonempty_left (hst : IsComplement S T) : S.Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst; simp [hst]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.nonempty_right (hst : IsComplement S T) : T.Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst; simp [hst]
@[to_additive] lemma IsComplement.pairwiseDisjoint_smul (hst : IsComplement S T) :
S.PairwiseDisjoint (· • T) := fun a ha b hb hab ↦ disjoint_iff_forall_ne.2 <| by
rintro _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
exact hst.1.ne (a₁ := (⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨c, hc⟩)) (a₂:= (⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨d, hd⟩)) (by simp [hab])
@[to_additive AddSubgroup.IsComplement.card_mul_card]
lemma IsComplement.card_mul_card (h : IsComplement S T) : Nat.card S * Nat.card T = Nat.card G :=
(Nat.card_prod _ _).symm.trans <| Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.ofBijective _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_top_bot : IsComplement' (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_bot_top : IsComplement' (⊥ : Subgroup G) ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_left : IsComplement' ⊥ H ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_left.trans coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_right : IsComplement' H ⊥ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_right.trans coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_left : IsComplement' ⊤ H ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_left.trans coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_right : IsComplement' H ⊤ ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_right.trans coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T := by
convert isComplement_iff_existsUnique with g
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· exact ⟨(x, ⟨_, hx⟩), by simp, by aesop⟩
· exact ⟨x.1, by simp [← hx], fun y hy ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 <| by simpa using hx' (y, ⟨_, hy⟩)).1⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem :
S ∈ leftTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T := by
rw [leftTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.1, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.2.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨y, (↑y)⁻¹ * g, hy⟩ (mul_inv_cancel_left ↑y g))).1⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨x, (↑x)⁻¹ * g, h1⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left (↑x) g, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.1 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.2.2)
exact Prod.ext hf (Subtype.ext (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy)))
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g, ∃! t : T, g * (t : G)⁻¹ ∈ S := by
convert isComplement_iff_existsUnique with g
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· exact ⟨(⟨_, hx⟩, x), by simp, by aesop⟩
· exact ⟨x.2, by simp [← hx], fun y hy ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 <| by simpa using hx' (⟨_, hy⟩, y)).2⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem :
S ∈ rightTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, g * (s : G)⁻¹ ∈ T := by
rw [rightTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.2, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.1.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨⟨g * (↑y)⁻¹, hy⟩, y⟩ (inv_mul_cancel_right g y))).2⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨⟨g * (↑x)⁻¹, h1⟩, x⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right g x, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.2 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.1.2)
exact Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy))) hf
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_existsUnique_quotientGroupMk :
IsComplement S H ↔ ∀ q : G ⧸ H, ∃! s : S, QuotientGroup.mk s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ← QuotientGroup.eq,
QuotientGroup.forall_mk]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_existsUnique_quotientGroupMk
(since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq :
S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.leftRel H), ∃! s : S, Quotient.mk'' s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ←
QuotientGroup.eq]
exact ⟨fun h q => Quotient.inductionOn' q h, fun h g => h (Quotient.mk'' g)⟩
set_option linter.docPrime false in
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_existsUnique_quotientMk'' :
IsComplement H T ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H), ∃! t : T, Quotient.mk'' t.1 = q := by
simp_rw [isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem, SetLike.mem_coe,
← QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply, ← Quotient.eq'', Quotient.forall]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_existsUnique_quotientMk''
(since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq :
S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H), ∃! s : S, Quotient.mk'' s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ←
QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply, ← Quotient.eq'']
exact ⟨fun h q => Quotient.inductionOn' q h, fun h g => h (Quotient.mk'' g)⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_bijective :
IsComplement S H ↔ Bijective (S.restrict (QuotientGroup.mk : G → G ⧸ H)) :=
isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_existsUnique_quotientGroupMk.trans
(bijective_iff_existsUnique (S.restrict QuotientGroup.mk)).symm
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_bijective (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective :
S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
Function.Bijective (S.restrict (Quotient.mk'' : G → Quotient (QuotientGroup.leftRel H))) :=
mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq.trans
(Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique (S.restrict Quotient.mk'')).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_bijective :
IsComplement H T ↔
Bijective (T.restrict (Quotient.mk'' : G → Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H))) :=
isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_existsUnique_quotientMk''.trans
(bijective_iff_existsUnique (T.restrict Quotient.mk'')).symm
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_bijective (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective :
S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
Function.Bijective (S.restrict (Quotient.mk'' : G → Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H))) :=
mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq.trans
(Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique (S.restrict Quotient.mk'')).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.card_left (h : IsComplement S H) : Nat.card S = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <| .ofBijective _ <| isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_bijective.mp h
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement.card_left (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem card_left_transversal (h : S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G)) : Nat.card S = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.ofBijective _ <| mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective.mp h
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.card_right (h : IsComplement H T) : Nat.card T = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <| (Equiv.ofBijective _ <| isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_bijective.mp h).trans <|
QuotientGroup.quotientRightRelEquivQuotientLeftRel H
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement.card_right (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem card_right_transversal (h : S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G)) : Nat.card S = H.index :=
Nat.card_congr <|
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective.mp h).trans <|
QuotientGroup.quotientRightRelEquivQuotientLeftRel H
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_range_left {f : G ⧸ H → G} (hf : ∀ q, ↑(f q) = q) :
IsComplement (range f) H := by
rw [isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_bijective]
refine ⟨?_, fun q ↦ ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated isComplement_range_left (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem range_mem_leftTransversals {f : G ⧸ H → G} (hf : ∀ q, ↑(f q) = q) :
Set.range f ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) :=
mem_leftTransversals_iff_bijective.mpr
⟨by rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂),
fun q => ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_range_right {f : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) → G}
(hf : ∀ q, Quotient.mk'' (f q) = q) : IsComplement H (range f) := by
rw [isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_bijective]
refine ⟨?_, fun q ↦ ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated isComplement_range_right (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem range_mem_rightTransversals {f : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) → G}
(hf : ∀ q, Quotient.mk'' (f q) = q) : Set.range f ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G) :=
mem_rightTransversals_iff_bijective.mpr
⟨by rintro ⟨-, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨-, q₂, rfl⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext <| congr_arg f <| ((hf q₁).symm.trans h).trans (hf q₂),
fun q => ⟨⟨f q, q, rfl⟩, hf q⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_isComplement_left (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) : ∃ S, IsComplement S H ∧ g ∈ S := by
classical
refine ⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out _ g), isComplement_range_left fun q ↦ ?_,
QuotientGroup.mk g, Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out)
· refine Function.update_of_ne ?_ g Quotient.out ▸ q.out_eq'
exact hq
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated exists_isComplement_left (since := "2024-12-18"))]
lemma exists_left_transversal (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G), g ∈ S := by
classical
refine
⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out _ g), range_mem_leftTransversals fun q => ?_,
Quotient.mk'' g, Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out)
· refine (Function.update_of_ne ?_ g Quotient.out) ▸ q.out_eq'
exact hq
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_isComplement_right (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ T, IsComplement H T ∧ g ∈ T := by
classical
refine ⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out _ g), isComplement_range_right fun q ↦ ?_,
Quotient.mk'' g, Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out)
· refine Function.update_of_ne ?_ g Quotient.out ▸ q.out_eq'
exact hq
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated exists_isComplement_right (since := "2024-12-18"))]
lemma exists_right_transversal (H : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ S ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G), g ∈ S := by
classical
refine
⟨Set.range (Function.update Quotient.out _ g), range_mem_rightTransversals fun q => ?_,
Quotient.mk'' g, Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out⟩
by_cases hq : q = Quotient.mk'' g
· exact hq.symm ▸ congr_arg _ (Function.update_self (Quotient.mk'' g) g Quotient.out)
· exact Eq.trans (congr_arg _ (Function.update_of_ne hq g Quotient.out)) q.out_eq'
/-- Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a left transversal to `H'` inside `H`. -/
@[to_additive "Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a transversal to `H'` inside `H`"]
lemma exists_left_transversal_of_le {H' H : Subgroup G} (h : H' ≤ H) :
∃ S : Set G, S * H' = H ∧ Nat.card S * Nat.card H' = Nat.card H := by
let H'' : Subgroup H := H'.comap H.subtype
have : H' = H''.map H.subtype := by simp [H'', h]
rw [this]
obtain ⟨S, cmem, -⟩ := H''.exists_isComplement_left 1
refine ⟨H.subtype '' S, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : H.subtype '' (S * H'') = H.subtype '' S * H''.map H.subtype := image_mul H.subtype
rw [← this, cmem.mul_eq]
simp [Set.ext_iff]
· rw [← cmem.card_mul_card]
refine congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_ <;>
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.image _ _ <| subtype_injective H).symm
/-- Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a right transversal to `H'` inside `H`. -/
@[to_additive "Given two subgroups `H' ⊆ H`, there exists a transversal to `H'` inside `H`"]
lemma exists_right_transversal_of_le {H' H : Subgroup G} (h : H' ≤ H) :
∃ S : Set G, H' * S = H ∧ Nat.card H' * Nat.card S = Nat.card H := by
let H'' : Subgroup H := H'.comap H.subtype
have : H' = H''.map H.subtype := by simp [H'', h]
rw [this]
obtain ⟨S, cmem, -⟩ := H''.exists_isComplement_right 1
refine ⟨H.subtype '' S, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : H.subtype '' (H'' * S) = H''.map H.subtype * H.subtype '' S := image_mul H.subtype
rw [← this, cmem.mul_eq]
simp [Set.ext_iff]
· have : Nat.card H'' * Nat.card S = Nat.card H := cmem.card_mul_card
rw [← this]
refine congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_ <;>
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.image _ _ <| subtype_injective H).symm
namespace IsComplement
/-- The equivalence `G ≃ S × T`, such that the inverse is `(*) : S × T → G` -/
noncomputable def equiv {S T : Set G} (hST : IsComplement S T) : G ≃ S × T :=
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1) hST).symm
variable (hST : IsComplement S T) (hHT : IsComplement H T) (hSK : IsComplement S K)
@[simp] theorem equiv_symm_apply (x : S × T) : (hST.equiv.symm x : G) = x.1.1 * x.2.1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).fst * (hST.equiv g).snd = g :=
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1) hST).right_inv g
theorem equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).fst = g * ((hST.equiv g).snd : G)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (hST.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g)
theorem equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul (g : G) : ↑(hST.equiv g).snd = ((hST.equiv g).fst : G)⁻¹ * g :=
eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (hST.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g)
theorem equiv_fst_eq_iff_leftCosetEquivalence {g₁ g₂ : G} :
(hSK.equiv g₁).fst = (hSK.equiv g₂).fst ↔ LeftCosetEquivalence K g₁ g₂ := by
rw [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← hSK.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₂, ← hSK.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₁, ← h,
mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right, ← coe_inv, ← coe_mul]
exact Subtype.property _
· intro h
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem.1 hSK g₁).unique
· -- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp
· rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← mul_mem_cancel_right h]
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_assoc]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_iff_rightCosetEquivalence {g₁ g₂ : G} :
(hHT.equiv g₁).snd = (hHT.equiv g₂).snd ↔ RightCosetEquivalence H g₁ g₂ := by
rw [RightCosetEquivalence, rightCoset_eq_iff]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← hHT.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₂, ← hHT.equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd g₁, ← h,
mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, ← coe_inv, ← coe_mul]
exact Subtype.property _
· intro h
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.1 hHT g₁).unique
· -- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]; simp
· rw [SetLike.mem_coe, ← mul_mem_cancel_left h]
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, mul_assoc]; simp
theorem leftCosetEquivalence_equiv_fst (g : G) :
LeftCosetEquivalence K g ((hSK.equiv g).fst : G) := by
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv]; simp [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff]
theorem rightCosetEquivalence_equiv_snd (g : G) :
RightCosetEquivalence H g ((hHT.equiv g).snd : G) := by
-- This used to be `simp [...]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [RightCosetEquivalence, rightCoset_eq_iff, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]; simp
theorem equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) (hg : g ∈ S) :
(hST.equiv g).fst = ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
have : hST.equiv.symm (⟨g, hg⟩, ⟨1, h1⟩) = g := by
rw [equiv, Equiv.ofBijective]; simp
conv_lhs => rw [← this, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) (hg : g ∈ T) :
(hST.equiv g).snd = ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
have : hST.equiv.symm (⟨1, h1⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩) = g := by
rw [equiv, Equiv.ofBijective]; simp
conv_lhs => rw [← this, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) (hg : g ∈ S) :
(hST.equiv g).snd = ⟨1, h1⟩ := by
ext
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem _ h1 hg, inv_mul_cancel]
theorem equiv_fst_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) (hg : g ∈ T) :
(hST.equiv g).fst = ⟨1, h1⟩ := by
ext
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem _ h1 hg, mul_inv_cancel]
theorem equiv_mul_right (g : G) (k : K) :
hSK.equiv (g * k) = ((hSK.equiv g).fst, (hSK.equiv g).snd * k) := by
have : (hSK.equiv (g * k)).fst = (hSK.equiv g).fst :=
hSK.equiv_fst_eq_iff_leftCosetEquivalence.2
(by simp [LeftCosetEquivalence, leftCoset_eq_iff])
ext
· rw [this]
· rw [coe_mul, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, this, equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, mul_assoc]
theorem equiv_mul_right_of_mem {g k : G} (h : k ∈ K) :
hSK.equiv (g * k) = ((hSK.equiv g).fst, (hSK.equiv g).snd * ⟨k, h⟩) :=
equiv_mul_right _ g ⟨k, h⟩
theorem equiv_mul_left (h : H) (g : G) :
hHT.equiv (h * g) = (h * (hHT.equiv g).fst, (hHT.equiv g).snd) := by
have : (hHT.equiv (h * g)).2 = (hHT.equiv g).2 := hHT.equiv_snd_eq_iff_rightCosetEquivalence.2 ?_
· ext
· rw [coe_mul, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, this, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
· rw [this]
· simp [RightCosetEquivalence, ← smul_smul]
theorem equiv_mul_left_of_mem {h g : G} (hh : h ∈ H) :
hHT.equiv (h * g) = (⟨h, hh⟩ * (hHT.equiv g).fst, (hHT.equiv g).snd) :=
equiv_mul_left _ ⟨h, hh⟩ g
theorem equiv_one (hs1 : 1 ∈ S) (ht1 : 1 ∈ T) :
hST.equiv 1 = (⟨1, hs1⟩, ⟨1, ht1⟩) := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]; simp [equiv]
theorem equiv_fst_eq_self_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) :
((hST.equiv g).fst : G) = g ↔ g ∈ S := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact Subtype.prop _
· intro h
rw [hST.equiv_fst_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem h1 h]
theorem equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) :
((hST.equiv g).snd : G) = g ↔ g ∈ T := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact Subtype.prop _
· intro h
rw [hST.equiv_snd_eq_self_of_mem_of_one_mem h1 h]
theorem coe_equiv_fst_eq_one_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ S) :
((hST.equiv g).fst : G) = 1 ↔ g ∈ T := by
rw [equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, eq_comm, equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem _ h1]
theorem coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem {g : G} (h1 : 1 ∈ T) :
((hST.equiv g).snd : G) = 1 ↔ g ∈ S := by
rw [equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, inv_mul_eq_one, equiv_fst_eq_self_iff_mem _ h1]
/-- A left transversal is in bijection with left cosets. -/
@[to_additive "A left transversal is in bijection with left cosets."]
noncomputable def leftQuotientEquiv (hS : IsComplement S H) : G ⧸ H ≃ S :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ (isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_bijective.mp hS)).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.toEquiv := leftQuotientEquiv
/-- A left transversal is finite iff the subgroup has finite index. -/
@[to_additive "A left transversal is finite iff the subgroup has finite index."]
theorem finite_left_iff (h : IsComplement S H) : Finite S ↔ H.FiniteIndex := by
rw [← h.leftQuotientEquiv.finite_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ ↦ finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient, fun _ ↦ finite_quotient_of_finiteIndex⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.finite_iff := finite_left_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma finite_left [H.FiniteIndex] (hS : IsComplement S H) : S.Finite := hS.finite_left_iff.2 ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem quotientGroupMk_leftQuotientEquiv (hS : IsComplement S H) (q : G ⧸ H) :
Quotient.mk'' (leftQuotientEquiv hS q : G) = q :=
hS.leftQuotientEquiv.symm_apply_apply q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.mk''_toEquiv := quotientGroupMk_leftQuotientEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem leftQuotientEquiv_apply {f : G ⧸ H → G} (hf : ∀ q, (f q : G ⧸ H) = q) (q : G ⧸ H) :
(leftQuotientEquiv (isComplement_range_left hf) q : G) = f q := by
refine (Subtype.ext_iff.mp ?_).trans (Subtype.coe_mk (f q) ⟨q, rfl⟩)
exact (leftQuotientEquiv (isComplement_range_left hf)).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.mpr (hf q).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.toEquiv_apply := leftQuotientEquiv_apply
/-- A left transversal can be viewed as a function mapping each element of the group
to the chosen representative from that left coset. -/
@[to_additive "A left transversal can be viewed as a function mapping each element of the group
to the chosen representative from that left coset."]
noncomputable def toLeftFun (hS : IsComplement S H) : G → S := leftQuotientEquiv hS ∘ Quotient.mk''
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.toFun := toLeftFun
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_toLeftFun_mul_mem (hS : IsComplement S H) (g : G) :
(toLeftFun hS g : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ H :=
QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply.mp <| Quotient.exact' <| quotientGroupMk_leftQuotientEquiv _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.inv_toFun_mul_mem := inv_toLeftFun_mul_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_toLeftFun_mem (hS : IsComplement S H) (g : G) :
g⁻¹ * toLeftFun hS g ∈ H :=
(congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [mul_inv_rev, inv_inv])).mp (H.inv_mem (inv_toLeftFun_mul_mem hS g))
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemLeftTransversals.inv_mul_toFun_mem := inv_mul_toLeftFun_mem
/-- A right transversal is in bijection with right cosets. -/
@[to_additive "A right transversal is in bijection with right cosets."]
noncomputable def rightQuotientEquiv (hT : IsComplement H T) :
Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) ≃ T :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ (isComplement_subgroup_left_iff_bijective.mp hT)).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemRightTransversals.toEquiv := rightQuotientEquiv
/-- A right transversal is finite iff the subgroup has finite index. -/
@[to_additive "A right transversal is finite iff the subgroup has finite index."]
theorem finite_right_iff (h : IsComplement H T) : Finite T ↔ H.FiniteIndex := by
rw [← h.rightQuotientEquiv.finite_iff,
(QuotientGroup.quotientRightRelEquivQuotientLeftRel H).finite_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ ↦ finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient, fun _ ↦ finite_quotient_of_finiteIndex⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemRightTransversals.finite_iff := finite_right_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma finite_right [H.FiniteIndex] (hT : IsComplement H T) : T.Finite := hT.finite_right_iff.2 ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem mk''_rightQuotientEquiv (hT : IsComplement H T)
(q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H)) : Quotient.mk'' (rightQuotientEquiv hT q : G) = q :=
(rightQuotientEquiv hT).symm_apply_apply q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemRightTransversals.mk''_toEquiv := mk''_rightQuotientEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightQuotientEquiv_apply {f : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) → G}
(hf : ∀ q, Quotient.mk'' (f q) = q) (q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H)) :
(rightQuotientEquiv (isComplement_range_right hf) q : G) = f q := by
refine (Subtype.ext_iff.mp ?_).trans (Subtype.coe_mk (f q) ⟨q, rfl⟩)
exact (rightQuotientEquiv (isComplement_range_right hf)).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 (hf q).symm
| @[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias _root_.Subgroup.MemRightTransversals.toEquiv_apply := rightQuotientEquiv_apply
/-- A right transversal can be viewed as a function mapping each element of the group
to the chosen representative from that right coset. -/
@[to_additive "A right transversal can be viewed as a function mapping each element of the group
to the chosen representative from that right coset."]
noncomputable def toRightFun (hT : IsComplement H T) : G → T := rightQuotientEquiv hT ∘ .mk''
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Complement.lean | 679 | 688 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-!
# Towers of algebras
In this file we prove basic facts about towers of algebra.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `Algebra A S`,
`Algebra R S`, `Algebra R A` and `IsScalarTower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
An important definition is `toAlgHom R S A`, the canonical `R`-algebra homomorphism `S →ₐ[R] A`.
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁ v₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁) (M : Type v₁)
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [Module B M]
variable [IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower R B M] [SMulCommClass A B M]
variable {A}
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A → End (M)` corresponding to the representation of the algebra `A`
on the `B`-module `M`.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toLinearMap`, and could also have been
called `Algebra.toModuleEnd`.
The typeclasses correspond to the situation where the types act on each other as
```
R ----→ B
| ⟍ |
| ⟍ |
↓ ↘ ↓
A ----→ M
```
where the diagram commutes, the action by `R` commutes with everything, and the action by `A` and
`B` on `M` commute.
Typically this is most useful with `B = R` as `Algebra.lsmul R R A : A →ₐ[R] Module.End R M`.
However this can be used to get the fact that left-multiplication by `A` is right `A`-linear, and
vice versa, as
```lean
example : A →ₐ[R] Module.End Aᵐᵒᵖ A := Algebra.lsmul R Aᵐᵒᵖ A
example : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₐ[R] Module.End A A := Algebra.lsmul R A A
```
respectively; though `LinearMap.mulLeft` and `LinearMap.mulRight` can also be used here.
-/
def lsmul : A →ₐ[R] Module.End B M where
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap B M
map_one' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => one_smul A _
map_mul' a b := LinearMap.ext <| smul_assoc a b
map_zero' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => zero_smul A _
map_add' _a _b := LinearMap.ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _
commutes' r := LinearMap.ext <| algebraMap_smul A r
@[simp]
theorem lsmul_coe (a : A) : (lsmul R B M a : M → M) = (a • ·) := rfl
end Algebra
namespace IsScalarTower
section Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [MulAction A M]
variable {R} {M}
theorem algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R A M] (r : R) (x : M) :
algebraMap R A r • x = r • x := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
variable {A} in
theorem of_algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] (h : ∀ (r : R) (x : M), algebraMap R A r • x = r • x) :
IsScalarTower R A M where
smul_assoc r a x := by rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul, h]
variable (R M) in
theorem of_compHom : letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); IsScalarTower R A M :=
letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); of_algebraMap_smul fun _ _ ↦ rfl
end Module
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable {R S A}
theorem of_algebraMap_eq [Algebra R A]
(h : ∀ x, algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
⟨fun x y z => by simp_rw [Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, h]⟩
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem of_algebraMap_eq' [Algebra R A]
(h : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq <| RingHom.ext_iff.1 h
variable (R S A)
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S) :=
RingHom.ext fun x => by
simp_rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_apply (x : R) : algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x) := by
rw [algebraMap_eq R S A, RingHom.comp_apply]
@[ext]
theorem Algebra.ext {S : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] (h1 h2 : Algebra S A)
(h : ∀ (r : S) (x : A), (by have I := h1; exact r • x) = r • x) : h1 = h2 :=
Algebra.algebra_ext _ _ fun r => by
simpa only [@Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h1, @Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h2, mul_one] using h r 1
/-- In a tower, the canonical map from the middle element to the top element is an
algebra homomorphism over the bottom element. -/
def toAlgHom : S →ₐ[R] A :=
{ algebraMap S A with commutes' := fun _ => (algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm }
theorem toAlgHom_apply (y : S) : toAlgHom R S A y = algebraMap S A y := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom : ↑(toAlgHom R S A) = algebraMap S A :=
RingHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom' : (toAlgHom R S A : S → A) = algebraMap S A := rfl
variable {R S A B}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_algebraMap (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (r : R) :
f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r := by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A r, f.commutes, ← algebraMap_apply R S B]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower (f : A →ₐ[S] B) :
(f : A →+* B).comp (algebraMap R A) = algebraMap R B :=
RingHom.ext (AlgHom.map_algebraMap f)
-- conflicts with IsScalarTower.Subalgebra
instance (priority := 999) subsemiring (U : Subsemiring S) : IsScalarTower U S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq fun _x => rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12096): removed @[nolint instance_priority], linter not ported yet
instance (priority := 999) of_algHom {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A]
[CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
@IsScalarTower R A B _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra.toSMul _ :=
letI := (f : A →+* B).toAlgebra
of_algebraMap_eq fun x => (f.commutes x).symm
end Semiring
end IsScalarTower
section Homs
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
variable {A S B}
open IsScalarTower
namespace AlgHom
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def restrictScalars (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →+* B) with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A, algebraMap_apply R S B]
exact f.commutes (algebraMap R S r) }
theorem restrictScalars_apply (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A →+* B) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars' (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : (restrictScalars R f : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A →ₐ[S] B) → A →ₐ[R] B) := fun _ _ h =>
AlgHom.ext (AlgHom.congr_fun h :)
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def restrictScalars (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃+* B) with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A, algebraMap_apply R S B]
exact f.commutes (algebraMap R S r) }
theorem restrictScalars_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A ≃+* B) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars' (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : (restrictScalars R f : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A ≃ₐ[S] B) → A ≃ₐ[R] B) := fun _ _ h =>
AlgEquiv.ext (AlgEquiv.congr_fun h :)
end AlgEquiv
end Homs
namespace Submodule
variable {M}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
/-- If `A` is an `R`-algebra such that the induced morphism `R →+* A` is surjective, then the
`R`-module generated by a set `X` equals the `A`-module generated by `X`. -/
theorem restrictScalars_span (hsur : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R A)) (X : Set M) :
restrictScalars R (span A X) = span R X := by
refine ((span_le_restrictScalars R A X).antisymm fun m hm => ?_).symm
refine span_induction subset_span (zero_mem _) (fun _ _ _ _ => add_mem) (fun a m _ hm => ?_) hm
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hsur a
simpa [algebraMap_smul] using smul_mem _ r hm
theorem coe_span_eq_span_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R A)) (s : Set M) :
(Submodule.span A s : Set M) = Submodule.span R s :=
congr_arg ((↑) : Submodule R M → Set M) (Submodule.restrictScalars_span R A h s)
end Submodule
section Semiring
variable {R S A}
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Module R S] [Module S A] [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
open IsScalarTower
theorem smul_mem_span_smul_of_mem {s : Set S} {t : Set A} {k : S} (hks : k ∈ span R s) {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ t) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) :=
span_induction (fun _ hc => subset_span <| Set.smul_mem_smul hc hx)
(by rw [zero_smul]; exact zero_mem _)
(fun c₁ c₂ _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => by rw [add_smul]; exact add_mem ih₁ ih₂)
(fun b c _ hc => by rw [IsScalarTower.smul_assoc]; exact smul_mem _ _ hc) hks
theorem span_smul_of_span_eq_top {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) (t : Set A) :
span R (s • t) = (span S t).restrictScalars R :=
le_antisymm
(span_le.2 fun _x ⟨p, _hps, _q, hqt, hpqx⟩ ↦ hpqx ▸ (span S t).smul_mem p (subset_span hqt))
fun _ hp ↦ closure_induction (hx := hp) (zero_mem _) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ add_mem) fun s0 y hy ↦ by
refine span_induction (fun x hx ↦ subset_span <| by exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_
(hs ▸ mem_top : s0 ∈ span R s)
· rw [zero_smul]; apply zero_mem
· intro _ _ _ _; rw [add_smul]; apply add_mem
· intro r s0 _ hy; rw [IsScalarTower.smul_assoc]; exact smul_mem _ r hy
-- The following two lemmas were originally used to prove `span_smul_of_span_eq_top`
-- but are now not needed.
theorem smul_mem_span_smul' {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : Set A} {k : S} {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ span R (s • t)) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) := by
rw [span_smul_of_span_eq_top hs] at hx ⊢; exact (span S t).smul_mem k hx
theorem smul_mem_span_smul {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : Set A} {k : S} {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ span R t) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) := by
rw [span_smul_of_span_eq_top hs]
exact (span S t).smul_mem k (span_le_restrictScalars R S t hx)
end Module
section Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Algebra R S] [Module S A] [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- A variant of `Submodule.span_image` for `algebraMap`. -/
theorem span_algebraMap_image (a : Set R) :
| Submodule.span R (algebraMap R S '' a) = (Submodule.span R a).map (Algebra.linearMap R S) :=
(Submodule.span_image <| Algebra.linearMap R S).trans rfl
theorem span_algebraMap_image_of_tower {S T : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring T] [Module R S]
[Algebra R T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] (a : Set S) :
Submodule.span R (algebraMap S T '' a) =
(Submodule.span R a).map ((Algebra.linearMap S T).restrictScalars R) :=
(Submodule.span_image <| (Algebra.linearMap S T).restrictScalars R).trans rfl
theorem map_mem_span_algebraMap_image {S T : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring T] [Algebra R S]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Tower.lean | 304 | 313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : g • a ≤ a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (pow_smul_le h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm h key
end FiniteGroup
section PowIsSubgroup
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative monoid is a submonoid -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative add monoid is a submonoid"]
def submonoidOfIdempotent {M : Type*} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [Finite M] (S : Set M)
(hS1 : S.Nonempty) (hS2 : S * S = S) : Submonoid M :=
have pow_mem (a : M) (ha : a ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) ∈ S := by
induction n with
| zero => rwa [zero_add, pow_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [← hS2, pow_succ]
exact Set.mul_mem_mul ih ha
{ carrier := S
one_mem' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS1
rw [← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt (orderOf_pos a))]
exact pow_mem a ha (orderOf a - 1)
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => (congr_arg₂ (· ∈ ·) rfl hS2).mp (Set.mul_mem_mul ha hb) }
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite group is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite add group is a subgroup"]
def subgroupOfIdempotent {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (S : Set G) (hS1 : S.Nonempty)
(hS2 : S * S = S) : Subgroup G :=
{ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 with
carrier := S
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show a⁻¹ ∈ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 by
rw [← one_mul a⁻¹, ← pow_one a, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← pow_sub a (orderOf_pos a)]
exact pow_mem ha (orderOf a - 1) }
/-- If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite group `G`, then `S ^ |G|` is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) smulCardAddSubgroup
"If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite add group `G`, then `|G| • S` is a subgroup"]
def powCardSubgroup {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (S : Set G) (hS : S.Nonempty) : Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ S ^ Fintype.card G := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS
rw [← pow_card_eq_one]
exact Set.pow_mem_pow ha
subgroupOfIdempotent (S ^ Fintype.card G) ⟨1, one_mem⟩ <| by
classical
apply (Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_mul_left _ one_mem) (ge_of_eq _)).symm
simp_rw [← pow_add,
Group.card_pow_eq_card_pow_card_univ S (Fintype.card G + Fintype.card G) le_add_self]
end PowIsSubgroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_one (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, ha⟩ := ha.exists_pow_eq_one
| exact (pow_eq_one_iff_of_nonneg ha₀ hn.ne').1 ha
end LinearOrderedSemiring
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 1,055 | 1,057 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# Lebesgue measure on the real line and on `ℝⁿ`
We show that the Lebesgue measure on the real line (constructed as a particular case of additive
Haar measure on inner product spaces) coincides with the Stieltjes measure associated
to the function `x ↦ x`. We deduce properties of this measure on `ℝ`, and then of the product
Lebesgue measure on `ℝⁿ`. In particular, we prove that they are translation invariant.
We show that, on `ℝⁿ`, a linear map acts on Lebesgue measure by rescaling it through the absolute
value of its determinant, in `Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`.
More properties of the Lebesgue measure are deduced from this in
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean`, where they are proved more generally for any
additive Haar measure on a finite-dimensional real vector space.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-!
### Definition of the Lebesgue measure and lengths of intervals
-/
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The volume on the real line (as a particular case of the volume on a finite-dimensional
inner product space) coincides with the Stieltjes measure coming from the identity function. -/
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ico a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ico_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ico a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Icc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Icc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Icc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioo a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioo_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioo a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_ball {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : volume.real (Metric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_closedBall {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume.real (Metric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [Metric.emetric_ball_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal, volume_ball, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_closedBall (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [EMetric.closedBall_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal, volume_closedBall, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
instance noAtoms_volume : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun _ => volume_singleton⟩
@[simp]
theorem volume_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume (uIcc a b) = ofReal |b - a| := by
rw [← Icc_min_max, volume_Icc, max_sub_min_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (uIcc a b) = |b - a| := by
simp [measureReal_def]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioi {a : ℝ} : volume (Ioi a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo a (a + n)) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Ioi a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ici {a : ℝ} : volume (Ici a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Ioi_ae_eq_Ici]; simp
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iio {a : ℝ} : volume (Iio a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo (a - n) a) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Iio a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iic {a : ℝ} : volume (Iic a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Iio_ae_eq_Iic]; simp
instance locallyFinite_volume : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun x =>
⟨Ioo (x - 1) (x + 1),
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one, lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one⟩, by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]⟩⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Icc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ico x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioo x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
theorem volume_le_diam (s : Set ℝ) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s := by
by_cases hs : Bornology.IsBounded s
· rw [Real.ediam_eq hs, ← volume_Icc]
exact volume.mono hs.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup
· rw [Metric.ediam_of_unbounded hs]; exact le_top
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real {p : ℝ → Prop} {a : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < volume { x | p x } := by
rcases h.exists_Ioo_subset with ⟨l, u, hx, hs⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hs)
simpa [-mem_Ioo] using hx.1.trans hx.2
/-!
### Volume of a box in `ℝⁿ`
-/
theorem volume_Icc_pi {a b : ι → ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, volume_pi_pi]
simp only [Real.volume_Icc]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc_pi_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (Icc a b)).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_Icc_pi, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioo, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ico {a b : ι → ℝ} :
| volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 251 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.AkraBazzi.GrowsPolynomially
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
/-!
# Divide-and-conquer recurrences and the Akra-Bazzi theorem
A divide-and-conquer recurrence is a function `T : ℕ → ℝ` that satisfies a recurrence relation of
the form `T(n) = ∑_{i=0}^{k-1} a_i T(r_i(n)) + g(n)` for large enough `n`, where `r_i(n)` is some
function where `‖r_i(n) - b_i n‖ ∈ o(n / (log n)^2)` for every `i`, the `a_i`'s are some positive
coefficients, and the `b_i`'s are reals `∈ (0,1)`. (Note that this can be improved to
`O(n / (log n)^(1+ε))`, this is left as future work.) These recurrences arise mainly in the
analysis of divide-and-conquer algorithms such as mergesort or Strassen's algorithm for matrix
multiplication. This class of algorithms works by dividing an instance of the problem of size `n`,
into `k` smaller instances, where the `i`'th instance is of size roughly `b_i n`, and calling itself
recursively on those smaller instances. `T(n)` then represents the running time of the algorithm,
and `g(n)` represents the running time required to actually divide up the instance and process the
answers that come out of the recursive calls. Since virtually all such algorithms produce instances
that are only approximately of size `b_i n` (they have to round up or down at the very least), we
allow the instance sizes to be given by some function `r_i(n)` that approximates `b_i n`.
The Akra-Bazzi theorem gives the asymptotic order of such a recurrence: it states that
`T(n) ∈ Θ(n^p (1 + ∑_{u=0}^{n-1} g(n) / u^{p+1}))`,
where `p` is the unique real number such that `∑ a_i b_i^p = 1`.
## Main definitions and results
* `AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r`: the predicate stating that `T : ℕ → ℝ` satisfies an Akra-Bazzi
recurrence with parameters `g`, `a`, `b` and `r` as above.
* `GrowsPolynomially`: The growth condition that `g` must satisfy for the theorem to apply.
It roughly states that
`c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for u between b*n and n for any constant `b ∈ (0,1)`.
* `sumTransform`: The transformation which turns a function `g` into
`n^p * ∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p+1)`.
* `asympBound`: The asymptotic bound satisfied by an Akra-Bazzi recurrence, namely
`n^p (1 + ∑ g(u) / u^(p+1))`
* `isTheta_asympBound`: The main result stating that
`T(n) ∈ Θ(n^p (1 + ∑_{u=0}^{n-1} g(n) / u^{p+1}))`
## Implementation
Note that the original version of the theorem has an integral rather than a sum in the above
expression, and first considers the `T : ℝ → ℝ` case before moving on to `ℕ → ℝ`. We prove the
above version with a sum, as it is simpler and more relevant for algorithms.
## TODO
* Specialize this theorem to the very common case where the recurrence is of the form
`T(n) = ℓT(r_i(n)) + g(n)`
where `g(n) ∈ Θ(n^t)` for some `t`. (This is often called the "master theorem" in the literature.)
* Add the original version of the theorem with an integral instead of a sum.
## References
* Mohamad Akra and Louay Bazzi, On the solution of linear recurrence equations
* Tom Leighton, Notes on better master theorems for divide-and-conquer recurrences
* Manuel Eberl, Asymptotic reasoning in a proof assistant
-/
open Finset Real Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Topology
/-!
#### Definition of Akra-Bazzi recurrences
This section defines the predicate `AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r` which states that `T`
satisfies the recurrence
`T(n) = ∑_{i=0}^{k-1} a_i T(r_i(n)) + g(n)`
with appropriate conditions on the various parameters.
-/
/-- An Akra-Bazzi recurrence is a function that satisfies the recurrence
`T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n`. -/
structure AkraBazziRecurrence {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [Nonempty α]
(T : ℕ → ℝ) (g : ℝ → ℝ) (a : α → ℝ) (b : α → ℝ) (r : α → ℕ → ℕ) where
/-- Point below which the recurrence is in the base case -/
n₀ : ℕ
/-- `n₀` is always `> 0` -/
n₀_gt_zero : 0 < n₀
/-- The `a`'s are nonzero -/
a_pos : ∀ i, 0 < a i
/-- The `b`'s are nonzero -/
b_pos : ∀ i, 0 < b i
/-- The b's are less than 1 -/
b_lt_one : ∀ i, b i < 1
/-- `g` is nonnegative -/
g_nonneg : ∀ x ≥ 0, 0 ≤ g x
/-- `g` grows polynomially -/
g_grows_poly : AkraBazziRecurrence.GrowsPolynomially g
/-- The actual recurrence -/
h_rec (n : ℕ) (hn₀ : n₀ ≤ n) : T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n
/-- Base case: `T(n) > 0` whenever `n < n₀` -/
T_gt_zero' (n : ℕ) (hn : n < n₀) : 0 < T n
/-- The `r`'s always reduce `n` -/
r_lt_n : ∀ i n, n₀ ≤ n → r i n < n
/-- The `r`'s approximate the `b`'s -/
dist_r_b : ∀ i, (fun n => (r i n : ℝ) - b i * n) =o[atTop] fun n => n / (log n) ^ 2
namespace AkraBazziRecurrence
section min_max
variable {α : Type*} [Finite α] [Nonempty α]
/-- Smallest `b i` -/
noncomputable def min_bi (b : α → ℝ) : α :=
Classical.choose <| Finite.exists_min b
/-- Largest `b i` -/
noncomputable def max_bi (b : α → ℝ) : α :=
Classical.choose <| Finite.exists_max b
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma min_bi_le {b : α → ℝ} (i : α) : b (min_bi b) ≤ b i :=
Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_min b) i
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma max_bi_le {b : α → ℝ} (i : α) : b i ≤ b (max_bi b) :=
Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_max b) i
end min_max
lemma isLittleO_self_div_log_id :
(fun (n : ℕ) => n / log n ^ 2) =o[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ)) := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) / log n ^ 2) = fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) * ((log n) ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
_ =o[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) * 1⁻¹ := by
refine IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _) ?_
refine IsLittleO.inv_rev ?main ?zero
case zero => simp
case main => calc
_ = (fun (_ : ℕ) => ((1 : ℝ) ^ 2)) := by simp
_ =o[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) => (log n)^2) :=
IsLittleO.pow (IsLittleO.natCast_atTop
<| isLittleO_const_log_atTop) (by norm_num)
_ = (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ)) := by ext; simp
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {T : ℕ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : α → ℝ} {r : α → ℕ → ℕ}
variable [Nonempty α] (R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r)
section
include R
lemma dist_r_b' : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i, ‖(r i n : ℝ) - b i * n‖ ≤ n / log n ^ 2 := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
simpa using IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (R.dist_r_b i)
lemma eventually_b_le_r : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (b i : ℝ) * n - (n / log n ^ 2) ≤ r i n := by
filter_upwards [R.dist_r_b'] with n hn
intro i
have h₁ : 0 ≤ b i := le_of_lt <| R.b_pos _
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
calc (b i : ℝ) * n - r i n = ‖b i * n‖ - ‖(r i n : ℝ)‖ := by
simp only [norm_mul, RCLike.norm_natCast, sub_left_inj,
Nat.cast_eq_zero, Real.norm_of_nonneg h₁]
_ ≤ ‖(b i * n : ℝ) - r i n‖ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
_ = ‖(r i n : ℝ) - b i * n‖ := norm_sub_rev _ _
_ ≤ n / log n ^ 2 := hn i
lemma eventually_r_le_b : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n ≤ (b i : ℝ) * n + (n / log n ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [R.dist_r_b'] with n hn
intro i
calc r i n = b i * n + (r i n - b i * n) := by ring
_ ≤ b i * n + ‖r i n - b i * n‖ := by gcongr; exact Real.le_norm_self _
_ ≤ b i * n + n / log n ^ 2 := by gcongr; exact hn i
lemma eventually_r_lt_n : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n < n := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop R.n₀] with n hn
exact fun i => R.r_lt_n i n hn
lemma eventually_bi_mul_le_r : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (b (min_bi b) / 2) * n ≤ r i n := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
have hlo := isLittleO_self_div_log_id
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hlo
have hlo' := hlo (by positivity : 0 < b (min_bi b) / 2)
filter_upwards [hlo', R.eventually_b_le_r] with n hn hn'
intro i
simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))] at hn
calc b (min_bi b) / 2 * n = b (min_bi b) * n - b (min_bi b) / 2 * n := by ring
_ ≤ b (min_bi b) * n - ‖n / log n ^ 2‖ := by gcongr
_ ≤ b i * n - ‖n / log n ^ 2‖ := by gcongr; aesop
_ = b i * n - n / log n ^ 2 := by
congr
exact Real.norm_of_nonneg <| by positivity
_ ≤ r i n := hn' i
lemma bi_min_div_two_lt_one : b (min_bi b) / 2 < 1 := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
calc b (min_bi b) / 2 < b (min_bi b) := by aesop (add safe apply div_two_lt_of_pos)
_ < 1 := R.b_lt_one _
lemma bi_min_div_two_pos : 0 < b (min_bi b) / 2 := div_pos (R.b_pos _) (by norm_num)
lemma exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r :
∃ c ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, c * n ≤ r i n := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
exact ⟨b (min_bi b) / 2, ⟨⟨by positivity, R.bi_min_div_two_lt_one⟩, R.eventually_bi_mul_le_r⟩⟩
lemma eventually_r_ge (C : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, C ≤ r i n := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := R.exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop ⌈C / c⌉₊, hc] with n hn₁ hn₂
have h₁ := hc_mem.1
intro i
calc C = c * (C / c) := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc]
exact (mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (by positivity)).symm
_ ≤ c * ⌈C / c⌉₊ := by gcongr; simp [Nat.le_ceil]
_ ≤ c * n := by gcongr
_ ≤ r i n := hn₂ i
lemma tendsto_atTop_r (i : α) : Tendsto (r i) atTop atTop := by
rw [tendsto_atTop]
intro b
have := R.eventually_r_ge b
rw [Filter.eventually_all] at this
exact_mod_cast this i
lemma tendsto_atTop_r_real (i : α) : Tendsto (fun n => (r i n : ℝ)) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop (R.tendsto_atTop_r i)
lemma exists_eventually_r_le_const_mul :
∃ c ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n ≤ c * n := by
let c := b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2
have h_max_bi_pos : 0 < b (max_bi b) := R.b_pos _
have h_max_bi_lt_one : 0 < 1 - b (max_bi b) := by
have : b (max_bi b) < 1 := R.b_lt_one _
linarith
have hc_pos : 0 < c := by positivity
have h₁ : 0 < (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 := by positivity
have hc_lt_one : c < 1 :=
calc b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 = b (max_bi b) * (1 / 2) + 1 / 2 := by ring
_ < 1 * (1 / 2) + 1 / 2 := by
gcongr
exact R.b_lt_one _
_ = 1 := by norm_num
refine ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc_lt_one⟩, ?_⟩
have hlo := isLittleO_self_div_log_id
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hlo
have hlo' := hlo h₁
filter_upwards [hlo', R.eventually_r_le_b] with n hn hn'
intro i
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)] at hn
simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))] at hn
calc r i n ≤ b i * n + n / log n ^ 2 := by exact hn' i
_ ≤ b i * n + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 * n := by gcongr
_ = (b i + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2) * n := by ring
_ ≤ (b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2) * n := by gcongr; exact max_bi_le _
lemma eventually_r_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < r i n := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
exact fun i => (R.tendsto_atTop_r i).eventually_gt_atTop 0
lemma eventually_log_b_mul_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < log (b i * n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
have h : Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => log (b i * n)) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.comp tendsto_log_atTop
<| Tendsto.const_mul_atTop (b_pos R i) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
exact h.eventually_gt_atTop 0
@[aesop safe apply] lemma T_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < T n := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n h_ind =>
cases lt_or_le n R.n₀ with
| inl hn => exact R.T_gt_zero' n hn -- n < R.n₀
| inr hn => -- R.n₀ ≤ n
rw [R.h_rec n hn]
have := R.g_nonneg
refine add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_pos ?sum_elems univ_nonempty) (by aesop)
exact fun i _ => mul_pos (R.a_pos i) <| h_ind _ (R.r_lt_n i _ hn)
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma T_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ T n := le_of_lt <| R.T_pos n
end
/-!
#### Smoothing function
We define `ε` as the "smoothing function" `fun n => 1 / log n`, which will be used in the form of a
factor of `1 ± ε n` needed to make the induction step go through.
This is its own definition to make it easier to switch to a different smoothing function.
For example, choosing `1 / log n ^ δ` for a suitable choice of `δ` leads to a slightly tighter
theorem at the price of a more complicated proof.
This part of the file then proves several properties of this function that will be needed later in
the proof.
-/
/-- The "smoothing function" is defined as `1 / log n`. This is defined as an `ℝ → ℝ` function
as opposed to `ℕ → ℝ` since this is more convenient for the proof, where we need to e.g. take
derivatives. -/
noncomputable def smoothingFn (n : ℝ) : ℝ := 1 / log n
local notation "ε" => smoothingFn
lemma one_add_smoothingFn_le_two {x : ℝ} (hx : exp 1 ≤ x) : 1 + ε x ≤ 2 := by
simp only [smoothingFn, ← one_add_one_eq_two]
gcongr
have : 1 < x := by
calc 1 = exp 0 := by simp
_ < exp 1 := by simp
_ ≤ x := hx
rw [div_le_one (log_pos this)]
calc 1 = log (exp 1) := by simp
_ ≤ log x := log_le_log (exp_pos _) hx
lemma isLittleO_smoothingFn_one : ε =o[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) := by
unfold smoothingFn
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun _ h => False.elim <| one_ne_zero h) ?_
simp only [one_div, div_one]
exact Tendsto.inv_tendsto_atTop Real.tendsto_log_atTop
lemma isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one : (fun x => 1 + ε x) ~[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :=
IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO IsEquivalent.refl isLittleO_smoothingFn_one
lemma isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one : (fun x => 1 - ε x) ~[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :=
IsEquivalent.sub_isLittleO IsEquivalent.refl isLittleO_smoothingFn_one
lemma growsPolynomially_one_sub_smoothingFn : GrowsPolynomially fun x => 1 - ε x :=
GrowsPolynomially.of_isEquivalent_const isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one
lemma growsPolynomially_one_add_smoothingFn : GrowsPolynomially fun x => 1 + ε x :=
GrowsPolynomially.of_isEquivalent_const isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real (c : ℝ) (hc : c < 1) :
∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, c < 1 - ε x := by
have h₁ : Tendsto (fun x => 1 - ε x) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
rw [← isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto one_ne_zero]
exact isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one
rw [tendsto_order] at h₁
exact h₁.1 c hc
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const (c : ℝ) (hc : c < 1) :
∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, c < 1 - ε n :=
Eventually.natCast_atTop (p := fun n => c < 1 - ε n)
<| eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real c hc
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos_real : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 < 1 - ε x :=
eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real 0 zero_lt_one
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 < 1 - ε n :=
| (eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos_real).natCast_atTop
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_nonneg : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 ≤ 1 - ε n := by
| Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/AkraBazzi.lean | 351 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Monad
import Mathlib.Control.ULiftable
/-!
# Specific Constructions of Probability Mass Functions
This file gives a number of different `PMF` constructions for common probability distributions.
`map` and `seq` allow pushing a `PMF α` along a function `f : α → β` (or distribution of
functions `f : PMF (α → β)`) to get a `PMF β`.
`ofFinset` and `ofFintype` simplify the construction of a `PMF α` from a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`,
by allowing the "sum equals 1" constraint to be in terms of `Finset.sum` instead of `tsum`.
`normalize` constructs a `PMF α` by normalizing a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` by its sum,
and `filter` uses this to filter the support of a `PMF` and re-normalize the new distribution.
`bernoulli` represents the bernoulli distribution on `Bool`.
-/
universe u v
namespace PMF
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open NNReal ENNReal Finset MeasureTheory
section Map
/-- The functorial action of a function on a `PMF`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) : PMF β :=
bind p (pure ∘ f)
variable (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) (b : β)
theorem monad_map_eq_map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (p : PMF α) : f <$> p = p.map f := rfl
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem map_apply : (map f p) b = ∑' a, if b = f a then p a else 0 := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem support_map : (map f p).support = f '' p.support :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [map, @eq_comm β b]
theorem mem_support_map_iff : b ∈ (map f p).support ↔ ∃ a ∈ p.support, f a = b := by simp
theorem bind_pure_comp : bind p (pure ∘ f) = map f p := rfl
theorem map_id : map id p = p :=
bind_pure _
theorem map_comp (g : β → γ) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g ∘ f) := by simp [map, Function.comp_def]
theorem pure_map (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
pure_bind _ _
theorem map_bind (q : α → PMF β) (f : β → γ) : (p.bind q).map f = p.bind fun a => (q a).map f :=
bind_bind _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind_map (p : PMF α) (f : α → β) (q : β → PMF γ) : (p.map f).bind q = p.bind (q ∘ f) :=
(bind_bind _ _ _).trans (congr_arg _ (funext fun _ => pure_bind _ _))
@[simp]
theorem map_const : p.map (Function.const α b) = pure b := by
simp only [map, Function.comp_def, bind_const, Function.const]
section Measure
variable (s : Set β)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_map_apply : (p.map f).toOuterMeasure s = p.toOuterMeasure (f ⁻¹' s) := by
simp [map, Set.indicator, toOuterMeasure_apply p (f ⁻¹' s)]
rfl
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_map_apply (hf : Measurable f)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (p.map f).toMeasure s = p.toMeasure (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ s hs,
toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ (f ⁻¹' s) (measurableSet_preimage hf hs)]
exact toOuterMeasure_map_apply f p s
@[simp]
lemma toMeasure_map (p : PMF α) (hf : Measurable f) : p.toMeasure.map f = (p.map f).toMeasure := by
ext s hs : 1; rw [PMF.toMeasure_map_apply _ _ _ hf hs, Measure.map_apply hf hs]
end Measure
end Map
section Seq
/-- The monadic sequencing operation for `PMF`. -/
def seq (q : PMF (α → β)) (p : PMF α) : PMF β :=
q.bind fun m => p.bind fun a => pure (m a)
variable (q : PMF (α → β)) (p : PMF α) (b : β)
theorem monad_seq_eq_seq {α β : Type u} (q : PMF (α → β)) (p : PMF α) : q <*> p = q.seq p := rfl
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem seq_apply : (seq q p) b = ∑' (f : α → β) (a : α), if b = f a then q f * p a else 0 := by
simp only [seq, mul_boole, bind_apply, pure_apply]
refine tsum_congr fun f => ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm.trans (tsum_congr fun a => ?_)
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_ite (b = f a) (q f) (p a) 0
@[simp]
theorem support_seq : (seq q p).support = ⋃ f ∈ q.support, f '' p.support :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [-mem_support_iff, seq, @eq_comm β b]
theorem mem_support_seq_iff : b ∈ (seq q p).support ↔ ∃ f ∈ q.support, b ∈ f '' p.support := by simp
end Seq
instance : LawfulFunctor PMF where
map_const := rfl
id_map := bind_pure
comp_map _ _ _ := (map_comp _ _ _).symm
instance : LawfulMonad PMF := LawfulMonad.mk'
(bind_pure_comp := fun _ _ => rfl)
(id_map := id_map)
(pure_bind := pure_bind)
(bind_assoc := bind_bind)
/--
This instance allows `do` notation for `PMF` to be used across universes, for instance as
```lean4
example {R : Type u} [Ring R] (x : PMF ℕ) : PMF R := do
let ⟨n⟩ ← ULiftable.up x
pure n
```
where `x` is in universe `0`, but the return value is in universe `u`.
-/
instance : ULiftable PMF.{u} PMF.{v} where
congr e :=
{ toFun := map e, invFun := map e.symm
left_inv := fun a => by simp [map_comp, map_id]
right_inv := fun a => by simp [map_comp, map_id] }
section OfFinset
/-- Given a finset `s` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with sum `1` on `s`,
such that `f a = 0` for `a ∉ s`, we get a `PMF`. -/
def ofFinset (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset α) (h : ∑ a ∈ s, f a = 1)
(h' : ∀ (a) (_ : a ∉ s), f a = 0) : PMF α :=
⟨f, h ▸ hasSum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero h'⟩
variable {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Finset α} (h : ∑ a ∈ s, f a = 1) (h' : ∀ (a) (_ : a ∉ s), f a = 0)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinset_apply (a : α) : ofFinset f s h h' a = f a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinset : (ofFinset f s h h').support = ↑s ∩ Function.support f :=
Set.ext fun a => by simpa [mem_support_iff] using mt (h' a)
theorem mem_support_ofFinset_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (ofFinset f s h h').support ↔ a ∈ s ∧ f a ≠ 0 := by
simp
theorem ofFinset_apply_of_not_mem {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : ofFinset f s h h' a = 0 :=
h' a ha
section Measure
variable (t : Set α)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_ofFinset_apply :
(ofFinset f s h h').toOuterMeasure t = ∑' x, t.indicator f x :=
toOuterMeasure_apply (ofFinset f s h h') t
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_ofFinset_apply [MeasurableSpace α] (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(ofFinset f s h h').toMeasure t = ∑' x, t.indicator f x :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ t ht).trans (toOuterMeasure_ofFinset_apply h h' t)
end Measure
end OfFinset
section OfFintype
/-- Given a finite type `α` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with sum 1, we get a `PMF`. -/
def ofFintype [Fintype α] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : ∑ a, f a = 1) : PMF α :=
ofFinset f Finset.univ h fun a ha => absurd (Finset.mem_univ a) ha
variable [Fintype α] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∑ a, f a = 1)
@[simp]
theorem ofFintype_apply (a : α) : ofFintype f h a = f a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFintype : (ofFintype f h).support = Function.support f := rfl
theorem mem_support_ofFintype_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (ofFintype f h).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := Iff.rfl
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
lemma map_ofFintype [Fintype β] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : ∑ a, f a = 1) (g : α → β) :
(ofFintype f h).map g = ofFintype (fun b ↦ ∑ a with g a = b, f a)
(by simpa [Finset.sum_fiberwise_eq_sum_filter univ univ g f]) := by
ext b : 1
simp only [sum_filter, eq_comm, map_apply, ofFintype_apply]
exact tsum_eq_sum fun _ h ↦ (h <| mem_univ _).elim
section Measure
variable (s : Set α)
@[simp high]
theorem toOuterMeasure_ofFintype_apply : (ofFintype f h).toOuterMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator f x :=
toOuterMeasure_apply (ofFintype f h) s
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_ofFintype_apply [MeasurableSpace α] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(ofFintype f h).toMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator f x :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ s hs).trans (toOuterMeasure_ofFintype_apply h s)
end Measure
end OfFintype
section normalize
/-- Given an `f` with non-zero and non-infinite sum, get a `PMF` by normalizing `f` by its `tsum`.
-/
def normalize (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf0 : tsum f ≠ 0) (hf : tsum f ≠ ∞) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a => f a * (∑' x, f x)⁻¹,
ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2 (ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.trans (ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hf0 hf))⟩
variable {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf0 : tsum f ≠ 0) (hf : tsum f ≠ ∞)
@[simp]
theorem normalize_apply (a : α) : (normalize f hf0 hf) a = f a * (∑' x, f x)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_normalize : (normalize f hf0 hf).support = Function.support f :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [hf, mem_support_iff]
theorem mem_support_normalize_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (normalize f hf0 hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by simp
end normalize
section Filter
/-- Create new `PMF` by filtering on a set with non-zero measure and normalizing. -/
def filter (p : PMF α) (s : Set α) (h : ∃ a ∈ s, a ∈ p.support) : PMF α :=
PMF.normalize (s.indicator p) (by simpa using h) (p.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top s)
variable {p : PMF α} {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, a ∈ p.support)
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply (a : α) :
(p.filter s h) a = s.indicator p a * (∑' a', (s.indicator p) a')⁻¹ := by
rw [filter, normalize_apply]
theorem filter_apply_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : (p.filter s h) a = 0 := by
rw [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero.mpr fun ha' => absurd ha' ha, zero_mul]
theorem mem_support_filter_iff {a : α} : a ∈ (p.filter s h).support ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ p.support :=
(mem_support_normalize_iff _ _ _).trans Set.indicator_apply_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_filter : (p.filter s h).support = s ∩ p.support :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_support_filter_iff _
theorem filter_apply_eq_zero_iff (a : α) : (p.filter s h) a = 0 ↔ a ∉ s ∨ a ∉ p.support := by
rw [apply_eq_zero_iff, support_filter, Set.mem_inter_iff, not_and_or]
theorem filter_apply_ne_zero_iff (a : α) : (p.filter s h) a ≠ 0 ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ p.support := by
rw [Ne, filter_apply_eq_zero_iff, not_or, Classical.not_not, Classical.not_not]
end Filter
section bernoulli
/-- A `PMF` which assigns probability `p` to `true` and `1 - p` to `false`. -/
def bernoulli (p : ℝ≥0∞) (h : p ≤ 1) : PMF Bool :=
ofFintype (fun b => cond b p (1 - p)) (by simp [h])
| variable {p : ℝ≥0∞} (h : p ≤ 1) (b : Bool)
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Constructions.lean | 296 | 297 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
- Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : α ⊕ (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {f : t.varFinset → β}
{v : β → M} (v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(t.restrictVar f).realize v = t.realize v' := by
induction t with
| var => simp [restrictVar, hv']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i ((by simp [Function.comp_apply, hv'])))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar' [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v :=
realize_restrictVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)}
{f : t.varFinsetLeft → β}
{xs : β ⊕ γ → M} (xs' : α → M) (hxs' : ∀ a, xs (Sum.inl (f a)) = xs' a) :
(t.restrictVarLeft f).realize xs = t.realize (Sum.elim xs' (xs ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
induction t with
| var a => cases a <;> simp [restrictVarLeft, hxs']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (by simp [hxs']))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVarLeft`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft' [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
realize_restrictVarLeft _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => simp
| @func n f ts ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· obtain - | f := f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (α ⊕ β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction t with
| var ab => rcases ab with a | b <;> simp [Language.con]
| func f ts ih =>
simp only [realize, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, ih, varsToConstants]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem HomClass.realize_term {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N]
(g : F) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, HomClass.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, max, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
apply realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction φ with
| falsum => simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
| @all k _ ih3 =>
have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
split_ifs <;> dsimp; omega
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
{f : φ.freeVarFinset → β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(φ.restrictFreeVar f).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v' xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_2]
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv']), realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| rel =>
simp only [Realize, freeVarFinset.eq_3, Finset.biUnion_val, restrictFreeVar]
congr!
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_4]
rw [ih1, ih2] <;> simp [hv']
| all _ ih3 =>
simp only [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
refine forall_congr' (fun _ => ?_)
rw [ih3]; simp [hv']
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictFreeVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar' [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs :=
realize_restrictFreeVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [← (lhomWithConstants L α).map_onRelation
(Equiv.sumEmpty (L.Relations n) ((constantsOn α).Relations n) R) xs]
rcongr
obtain - | R := R
· simp
· exact isEmptyElim R
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabelEquiv {g : α ≃ β} {k} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α k} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin k → M} : (relabelEquiv g φ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) xs := by
simp only [relabelEquiv, mapTermRelEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl]
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => ?_) fun _ _ _ => rfl
simp only [relabelEquiv_apply, Term.realize_relabel]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext (i | i) <;> rfl
variable [Nonempty M]
theorem realize_all_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).all.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
inhabit M
simp only [realize_all, realize_liftAt_one_self]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a => ?_⟩
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp (h default)
simp
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp h
simp
end BoundedFormula
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_onBoundedFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] {n : ℕ}
(ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.onBoundedFormula ψ).Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs := by
induction ψ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_bdEqual, realize_onTerm]; rfl
| rel =>
simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_rel, LHom.map_onRelation,
Function.comp_apply, realize_onTerm]
rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih1, ih2, realize_imp]
| all _ ih3 => simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih3, realize_all]
end LHom
namespace Formula
/-- A formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
nonrec def Realize (φ : L.Formula α) (v : α → M) : Prop :=
φ.Realize v default
variable {φ ψ : L.Formula α} {v : α → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v ↔ ¬φ.Realize v :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ True :=
BoundedFormula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∧ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v → ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term α} :
(R.formula ts).Realize v ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_rel.trans (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₁ t).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∨ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v ↔ (φ.Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v) :=
BoundedFormula.realize_iff
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {φ : L.Formula α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) := by
rw [Realize, Realize, relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, iff_eq_eq, Fin.castAdd_zero]
exact congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)
theorem realize_relabel_sumInr (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) {v : Empty → M} {x : Fin n → M} :
(BoundedFormula.relabel Sum.inr φ).Realize v x ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, Sum.elim_comp_inr, Fin.castAdd_zero,
cast_refl, Function.comp_id,
Subsingleton.elim (x ∘ (natAdd n : Fin 0 → Fin n)) default]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias realize_relabel_sum_inr := realize_relabel_sumInr
@[simp]
theorem realize_equal {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {x : α → M} :
(t₁.equal t₂).Realize x ↔ t₁.realize x = t₂.realize x := by simp [Term.equal, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_graph {f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} {y : M} :
(Formula.graph f).Realize (Fin.cons y x : _ → M) ↔ funMap f x = y := by
simp only [Formula.graph, Term.realize, realize_equal, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
rw [eq_comm]
theorem boundedFormula_realize_eq_realize (φ : L.Formula α) (x : α → M) (y : Fin 0 → M) :
BoundedFormula.Realize φ x y ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext i; exact Fin.elim0 i
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (ψ : L.Formula α)
{v : α → M} : (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v :=
φ.realize_onBoundedFormula ψ
@[simp]
theorem LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Formula α) : (setOf (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize : Set (α → M)) = setOf ψ.Realize := by
ext
simp
variable (M)
/-- A sentence can be evaluated as true or false in a structure. -/
nonrec def Sentence.Realize (φ : L.Sentence) : Prop :=
φ.Realize (default : _ → M)
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Sentence.Realize]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Sentence.Realize
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_not {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ φ.not ↔ ¬M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
namespace Formula
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm_con [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M] (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) :
((equivSentence.symm φ).Realize fun a => (L.con a : M)) ↔ φ.Realize M := by
simp only [equivSentence, _root_.Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.coe_trans, Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv, Function.comp]
refine _root_.trans ?_ BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
rw [iff_iff_eq]
congr with (_ | a)
· simp
· cases a
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence [L[[α]].Structure M] [(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M]
(φ : L.Formula α) : (equivSentence φ).Realize M ↔ φ.Realize fun a => (L.con a : M) := by
rw [← realize_equivSentence_symm_con M (equivSentence φ), _root_.Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) (v : α → M) :
(equivSentence.symm φ).Realize v ↔
@Sentence.Realize _ M (@Language.withConstantsStructure L M _ α (constantsOn.structure v))
φ :=
letI := constantsOn.structure v
realize_equivSentence_symm_con M φ
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onSentence [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ.onSentence ψ ↔ M ⊨ ψ :=
φ.realize_onFormula ψ
variable (L)
/-- The complete theory of a structure `M` is the set of all sentences `M` satisfies. -/
def completeTheory : L.Theory :=
{ φ | M ⊨ φ }
variable (N)
/-- Two structures are elementarily equivalent when they satisfy the same sentences. -/
def ElementarilyEquivalent : Prop :=
L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent]
scoped[FirstOrder]
notation:25 A " ≅[" L "] " B:50 => FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
@[simp]
theorem mem_completeTheory {φ : Sentence L} : φ ∈ L.completeTheory M ↔ M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem elementarilyEquivalent_iff : M ≅[L] N ↔ ∀ φ : L.Sentence, M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
simp only [ElementarilyEquivalent, Set.ext_iff, completeTheory, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
variable (M)
/-- A model of a theory is a structure in which every sentence is realized as true. -/
class Theory.Model (T : L.Theory) : Prop where
realize_of_mem : ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Theory.Model]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Theory.Model
variable {M} (T : L.Theory)
@[simp default - 10]
theorem Theory.model_iff : M ⊨ T ↔ ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ :=
⟨fun h => h.realize_of_mem, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem [M ⊨ T] {φ : L.Sentence} (h : φ ∈ T) : M ⊨ φ :=
Theory.Model.realize_of_mem φ h
@[simp]
theorem LHom.onTheory_model [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (T : L.Theory) :
M ⊨ φ.onTheory T ↔ M ⊨ T := by simp [Theory.model_iff, LHom.onTheory]
variable {T}
instance model_empty : M ⊨ (∅ : L.Theory) :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (Set.not_mem_empty φ hφ).elim⟩
namespace Theory
theorem Model.mono {T' : L.Theory} (_h : M ⊨ T') (hs : T ⊆ T') : M ⊨ T :=
⟨fun _φ hφ => T'.realize_sentence_of_mem (hs hφ)⟩
theorem Model.union {T' : L.Theory} (h : M ⊨ T) (h' : M ⊨ T') : M ⊨ T ∪ T' := by
simp only [model_iff, Set.mem_union] at *
exact fun φ hφ => hφ.elim (h _) (h' _)
@[simp]
theorem model_union_iff {T' : L.Theory} : M ⊨ T ∪ T' ↔ M ⊨ T ∧ M ⊨ T' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono Set.subset_union_left, h.mono Set.subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem model_singleton_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ ({φ} : L.Theory) ↔ M ⊨ φ := by simp
theorem model_insert_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ insert φ T ↔ M ⊨ φ ∧ M ⊨ T := by
rw [Set.insert_eq, model_union_iff, model_singleton_iff]
theorem model_iff_subset_completeTheory : M ⊨ T ↔ T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
T.model_iff
theorem completeTheory.subset [MT : M ⊨ T] : T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
model_iff_subset_completeTheory.1 MT
end Theory
instance model_completeTheory : M ⊨ L.completeTheory M :=
Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory.2 (subset_refl _)
variable (M N)
theorem realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory [N ⊨ L.completeTheory M] (φ : L.Sentence) :
N ⊨ φ ↔ M ⊨ φ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← Sentence.realize_not] at *
exact (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem (mem_completeTheory.2 h)
variable {M N}
namespace BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_alls {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.alls.Realize v ↔ ∀ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.forall_iff.symm
· simp only [alls, ih, Realize]
exact ⟨fun h xs => Fin.snoc_init_self xs ▸ h _ _, fun h xs x => h (Fin.snoc xs x)⟩
@[simp]
theorem realize_exs {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.exs.Realize v ↔ ∃ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.exists_iff.symm
· simp only [BoundedFormula.exs, ih, realize_ex]
constructor
· rintro ⟨xs, x, h⟩
exact ⟨_, h⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
rw [← Fin.snoc_init_self xs] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iAlls
[Finite β] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ β)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iAlls β).Realize v ↔
∀ (i : β → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i a) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin β))
rw [Formula.iAlls]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_alls, realize_relabel, Function.comp_def,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iAlls [Finite β] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ β)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iAlls β) v v' ↔
∀ (i : β → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i a) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iAlls, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExs
[Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iExs γ).Realize v ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iExs]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_exs, realize_relabel, Function.comp_def,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.exists_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp_def]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iExs [Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExs γ) v v' ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iExs, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem realize_toFormula (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (v : α ⊕ (Fin n) → M) :
φ.toFormula.Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ Sum.inl) (v ∘ Sum.inr) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
| rel => simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_imp, ← Formula.Realize, ih1, ← Formula.Realize, ih2,
realize_imp]
| all _ ih3 =>
rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_all, realize_all]
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_
have h := ih3 (Sum.elim (v ∘ Sum.inl) (snoc (v ∘ Sum.inr) a))
simp only [Sum.elim_comp_inl, Sum.elim_comp_inr] at h
rw [← h, realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
simp only [Function.comp_def]
congr with x
· rcases x with _ | x
· simp
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ x
· rw [Sum.elim_inr, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_last, Sum.map_inr, Sum.elim_inr]
simp [Fin.snoc]
· simp only [castSucc, Function.comp_apply, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_apply_castAdd, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
rw [← castSucc]
simp
· exact Fin.elim0 x
@[simp]
theorem realize_iSup [Finite β] {f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n}
{v : α → M} {v' : Fin n → M} :
(iSup f).Realize v v' ↔ ∃ b, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iSup, realize_foldr_sup, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList, Finset.mem_univ, true_and,
exists_exists_eq_and]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iInf [Finite β] {f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n}
{v : α → M} {v' : Fin n → M} :
(iInf f).Realize v v' ↔ ∀ b, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iInf, realize_foldr_inf, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList, Finset.mem_univ, true_and,
forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExsUnique [Finite γ]
{φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} : (φ.iExsUnique γ).Realize v ↔
∃! (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [Formula.iExsUnique, ExistsUnique]
simp only [Formula.realize_iExs, Formula.realize_inf, Formula.realize_iAlls, Formula.realize_imp,
Formula.realize_relabel]
simp only [Formula.Realize, Function.comp_def, Term.equal, Term.relabel, realize_iInf,
realize_bdEqual, Term.realize_var, Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, funext_iff]
refine exists_congr (fun i => and_congr_right' (forall_congr' (fun y => ?_)))
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x
cases x <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem realize_iExsUnique [Finite γ] {φ : L.Formula (α ⊕ γ)} {v : α → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExsUnique γ) v v' ↔
∃! (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (Sum.elim v i) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iExsUnique, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end BoundedFormula
namespace StrongHomClass
variable {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [StrongHomClass L F M N] (g : F)
@[simp]
theorem realize_boundedFormula (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : φ.Realize (g ∘ v) (g ∘ xs) ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, HomClass.realize_term,
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq g]
| rel =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, HomClass.realize_term]
exact StrongHomClass.map_rel g _ _
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, ih1, ih2, BoundedFormula.Realize]
| all _ ih3 =>
rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, BoundedFormula.Realize]
constructor
· intro h a
have h' := h (g a)
rw [← Fin.comp_snoc, ih3] at h'
exact h'
· intro h a
have h' := h (EquivLike.inv g a)
rw [← ih3, Fin.comp_snoc, EquivLike.apply_inv_apply g] at h'
exact h'
@[simp]
theorem realize_formula (φ : L.Formula α) {v : α → M} :
φ.Realize (g ∘ v) ↔ φ.Realize v := by
rw [Formula.Realize, Formula.Realize, ← realize_boundedFormula g φ, iff_eq_eq,
Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
include g
theorem realize_sentence (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
rw [Sentence.Realize, Sentence.Realize, ← realize_formula g,
Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
theorem theory_model [M ⊨ T] : N ⊨ T :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (realize_sentence g φ).1 (Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem T hφ)⟩
theorem elementarilyEquivalent : M ≅[L] N :=
elementarilyEquivalent_iff.2 (realize_sentence g)
end StrongHomClass
namespace Relations
open BoundedFormula
variable {r : L.Relations 2}
@[simp]
theorem realize_reflexive : M ⊨ r.reflexive ↔ Reflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_irreflexive : M ⊨ r.irreflexive ↔ Irreflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_congr realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_symmetric : M ⊨ r.symmetric ↔ Symmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_antisymmetric :
M ⊨ r.antisymmetric ↔ AntiSymmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ Iff.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem realize_transitive : M ⊨ r.transitive ↔ Transitive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
@[simp]
theorem realize_total : M ⊨ r.total ↔ Total fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_sup.trans (or_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
end Relations
section Cardinality
variable (L)
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_cardGe (n) : M ⊨ Sentence.cardGe L n ↔ ↑n ≤ #M := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_le.{0}, lift_lift, lift_mk_le, Sentence.cardGe, Sentence.Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_exs]
simp_rw [BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, List.mem_map, Prod.exists, Ne, List.mem_product,
List.mem_finRange, forall_exists_index, and_imp, List.mem_filter, true_and]
refine ⟨?_, fun xs => ⟨xs.some, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨xs, fun i j ij => ?_⟩⟩
contrapose! ij
have hij := h _ i j (by simpa using ij) rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.realize_not, Term.realize, BoundedFormula.realize_bdEqual,
Sum.elim_inr] at hij
exact hij
· rintro _ i j ij rfl
simpa using ij
@[simp]
theorem model_infiniteTheory_iff : M ⊨ L.infiniteTheory ↔ Infinite M := by
simp [infiniteTheory, infinite_iff, aleph0_le]
instance model_infiniteTheory [h : Infinite M] : M ⊨ L.infiniteTheory :=
L.model_infiniteTheory_iff.2 h
@[simp]
theorem model_nonemptyTheory_iff : M ⊨ L.nonemptyTheory ↔ Nonempty M := by
simp only [nonemptyTheory, Theory.model_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq,
Sentence.realize_cardGe, Nat.cast_one, one_le_iff_ne_zero, mk_ne_zero_iff]
instance model_nonempty [h : Nonempty M] : M ⊨ L.nonemptyTheory :=
L.model_nonemptyTheory_iff.2 h
theorem model_distinctConstantsTheory {M : Type w} [L[[α]].Structure M] (s : Set α) :
M ⊨ L.distinctConstantsTheory s ↔ Set.InjOn (fun i : α => (L.con i : M)) s := by
simp only [distinctConstantsTheory, Theory.model_iff, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_inter,
Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_compl, Prod.exists, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
refine ⟨fun h a as b bs ab => ?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose! ab
have h' := h _ a b ⟨⟨as, bs⟩, ab⟩ rfl
simp only [Sentence.Realize, Formula.realize_not, Formula.realize_equal,
Term.realize_constants] at h'
exact h'
· rintro h φ a b ⟨⟨as, bs⟩, ab⟩ rfl
simp only [Sentence.Realize, Formula.realize_not, Formula.realize_equal, Term.realize_constants]
exact fun contra => ab (h as bs contra)
theorem card_le_of_model_distinctConstantsTheory (s : Set α) (M : Type w) [L[[α]].Structure M]
[h : M ⊨ L.distinctConstantsTheory s] : Cardinal.lift.{w} #s ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u'} #M :=
lift_mk_le'.2 ⟨⟨_, Set.injOn_iff_injective.1 ((L.model_distinctConstantsTheory s).1 h)⟩⟩
end Cardinality
namespace ElementarilyEquivalent
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (h : M ≅[L] N) : N ≅[L] M :=
h.symm
@[trans]
nonrec theorem trans (MN : M ≅[L] N) (NP : N ≅[L] P) : M ≅[L] P :=
MN.trans NP
theorem completeTheory_eq (h : M ≅[L] N) : L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N :=
h
theorem realize_sentence (h : M ≅[L] N) (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ :=
(elementarilyEquivalent_iff.1 h) φ
theorem theory_model_iff (h : M ≅[L] N) : M ⊨ T ↔ N ⊨ T := by
rw [Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory, Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory,
h.completeTheory_eq]
theorem theory_model [MT : M ⊨ T] (h : M ≅[L] N) : N ⊨ T :=
h.theory_model_iff.1 MT
theorem nonempty_iff (h : M ≅[L] N) : Nonempty M ↔ Nonempty N :=
(model_nonemptyTheory_iff L).symm.trans (h.theory_model_iff.trans (model_nonemptyTheory_iff L))
theorem nonempty [Mn : Nonempty M] (h : M ≅[L] N) : Nonempty N :=
h.nonempty_iff.1 Mn
theorem infinite_iff (h : M ≅[L] N) : Infinite M ↔ Infinite N :=
(model_infiniteTheory_iff L).symm.trans (h.theory_model_iff.trans (model_infiniteTheory_iff L))
theorem infinite [Mi : Infinite M] (h : M ≅[L] N) : Infinite N :=
h.infinite_iff.1 Mi
end ElementarilyEquivalent
end Language
end FirstOrder
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 1,119 | 1,120 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Iic_inter_Ici, inter_inter_inter_comm, Iic_inter_Ici]
simp [hab, hbc]
lemma Icc_eq_Icc_iff {d : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
Icc a b = Icc c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
refine ⟨fun heq ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
have h' : c ≤ d := by
by_contra contra; rw [Icc_eq_empty_iff.mpr contra, Icc_eq_empty_iff] at heq; contradiction
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_Icc] at heq
obtain ⟨-, h₁⟩ := (heq b).mp ⟨h, le_refl _⟩
obtain ⟨h₂, -⟩ := (heq a).mp ⟨le_refl _, h⟩
obtain ⟨h₃, -⟩ := (heq c).mpr ⟨le_refl _, h'⟩
obtain ⟨-, h₄⟩ := (heq d).mpr ⟨h', le_refl _⟩
exact ⟨le_antisymm h₃ h₂, le_antisymm h₁ h₄⟩
end PartialOrder
section OrderTop
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} :=
isMax_top.Ici_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_top : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ :=
isMax_top.Ioi_eq
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ :=
isTop_top.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top : Icc a ⊤ = Ici a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top : Ioc a ⊤ = Ioi a := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} :=
isMin_bot.Iic_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_bot : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ :=
isMin_bot.Iio_eq
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ :=
isBot_bot.Ici_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot : Icc ⊥ a = Iic a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot : Ico ⊥ a = Iio a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
end OrderBot
theorem Icc_bot_top [Preorder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
section Lattice
section Inf
variable [SemilatticeInf α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_inter_Iic {a b : α} : Iic a ∩ Iic b = Iic (a ⊓ b) := by
ext x
simp [Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_inter_Iic (a b c : α) : Ioc a b ∩ Iic c = Ioc a (b ⊓ c) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_assoc, Iic_inter_Iic]
end Inf
section Sup
variable [SemilatticeSup α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_inter_Ici {a b : α} : Ici a ∩ Ici b = Ici (a ⊔ b) := by
ext x
simp [Ici]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ici (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ici c = Ico (a ⊔ c) b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Ici, inter_right_comm]
end Sup
section Both
variable [Lattice α] {a b c a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
theorem Icc_inter_Icc : Icc a₁ b₁ ∩ Icc a₂ b₂ = Icc (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) := by
simp only [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, Ici_inter_Ici.symm, Iic_inter_Iic.symm]; ac_rfl
end Both
end Lattice
/-! ### Closed intervals in `α × β` -/
section Prod
variable {β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_prod_Iic (a : α) (b : β) : Iic a ×ˢ Iic b = Iic (a, b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ici_prod_Ici (a : α) (b : β) : Ici a ×ˢ Ici b = Ici (a, b) :=
rfl
theorem Ici_prod_eq (a : α × β) : Ici a = Ici a.1 ×ˢ Ici a.2 :=
rfl
theorem Iic_prod_eq (a : α × β) : Iic a = Iic a.1 ×ˢ Iic a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_prod_Icc (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : Icc a₁ a₂ ×ˢ Icc b₁ b₂ = Icc (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
theorem Icc_prod_eq (a b : α × β) : Icc a b = Icc a.1 b.1 ×ˢ Icc a.2 b.2 := by simp
end Prod
end Set
/-! ### Lemmas about intervals in dense orders -/
section Dense
variable (α) [Preorder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {x y : α}
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioo x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₁ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁, hb₂.trans ha₂⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioc x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₁ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁, hb₂.le.trans ha₂⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioi x) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Ioo x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₂ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, ha₁.trans hb₁, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Ico x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₂ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, ha₁.trans hb₁.le, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Iio x) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
end Dense
/-! ### Intervals in `Prop` -/
namespace Set
@[simp] lemma Iic_False : Iic False = {False} := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Iic_True : Iic True = univ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Ici_False : Ici False = univ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Ici_True : Ici True = {True} := by aesop
lemma Iio_False : Iio False = ∅ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Iio_True : Iio True = {False} := by aesop (add simp [Ioi, lt_iff_le_not_le])
@[simp] lemma Ioi_False : Ioi False = {True} := by aesop (add simp [Ioi, lt_iff_le_not_le])
lemma Ioi_True : Ioi True = ∅ := by aesop
end Set
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 1,845 | 1,847 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 1,620 | 1,621 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ULift
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.CharZero
/-!
# Further basic results about `Algebra`.
This file could usefully be split further.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
open Function
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type w}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
section PUnit
instance _root_.PUnit.algebra : Algebra R PUnit.{v + 1} where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun _ := PUnit.unit
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
commutes' _ _ := rfl
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_pUnit (r : R) : algebraMap R PUnit r = PUnit.unit :=
rfl
end PUnit
section ULift
instance _root_.ULift.algebra : Algebra R (ULift A) :=
{ ULift.module' with
algebraMap :=
{ (ULift.ringEquiv : ULift A ≃+* A).symm.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) with
toFun := fun r => ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) }
commutes' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.commutes r x.down
smul_def' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.smul_def' r x.down }
theorem _root_.ULift.algebraMap_eq (r : R) :
algebraMap R (ULift A) r = ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ULift.down_algebraMap (r : R) : (algebraMap R (ULift A) r).down = algebraMap R A r :=
rfl
end ULift
/-- Algebra over a subsemiring. This builds upon `Subsemiring.module`. -/
instance ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subsemiring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : (algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring_apply (S : Subsemiring R) (x : S) : algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Algebra over a subring. This builds upon `Subring.module`. -/
instance ofSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (S : Subring R) :
Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) (x : S) :
algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Explicit characterization of the submonoid map in the case of an algebra.
`S` is made explicit to help with type inference -/
def algebraMapSubmonoid (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) : Submonoid S :=
M.map (algebraMap R S)
theorem mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {M : Submonoid R}
(x : M) : algebraMap R S x ∈ algebraMapSubmonoid S M :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem (algebraMap R S) x.2
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) = (x - algebraMap R A r) * x := by rw [mul_sub, ← commutes, sub_mul]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_pow_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n = (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n * x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes, mul_assoc, ih, ← mul_assoc]
end CommSemiring
| section Ring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Basic.lean | 137 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Ring
/-!
# Internally-graded rings and algebras
This file defines the typeclass `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, for working with an algebra `A` that is
internally graded by a collection of submodules `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A`.
See the docstring of that typeclass for more information.
## Main definitions
* `GradedRing 𝒜`: the typeclass, which is a combination of `SetLike.GradedMonoid`, and
`DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`: A convenience alias for `GradedRing` when `𝒜` is a family of submodules.
* `DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `DirectSum.decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i` is the linear map from `A` to its degree `i : ι` component, such that
`proj 𝒜 i x = decompose 𝒜 x i`.
## Implementation notes
For now, we do not have internally-graded semirings and internally-graded rings; these can be
represented with `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℕ A` and `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℤ A` respectively, since all
`Semiring`s are ℕ-algebras via `Semiring.toNatAlgebra`, and all `Ring`s are `ℤ`-algebras via
`Ring.toIntAlgebra`.
## Tags
graded algebra, graded ring, graded semiring, decomposition
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι R A σ : Type*}
section GradedRing
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
open DirectSum
/-- An internally-graded `R`-algebra `A` is one that can be decomposed into a collection
of `Submodule R A`s indexed by `ι` such that the canonical map `A → ⨁ i, 𝒜 i` is bijective and
respects multiplication, i.e. the product of an element of degree `i` and an element of degree `j`
is an element of degree `i + j`.
Note that the fact that `A` is internally-graded, `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, implies an externally-graded
algebra structure `DirectSum.GAlgebra R (fun i ↦ ↥(𝒜 i))`, which in turn makes available an
`Algebra R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i)` instance.
-/
class GradedRing (𝒜 : ι → σ) extends SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜, DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜
variable [GradedRing 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
a ring to a direct sum of components. -/
def decomposeRingEquiv : A ≃+* ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
RingEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := (coeRingHom 𝒜).map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem decompose_one : decompose 𝒜 (1 : A) = 1 :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜)
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_one : (decompose 𝒜).symm 1 = (1 : A) :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm
@[simp]
theorem decompose_mul (x y : A) : decompose 𝒜 (x * y) = decompose 𝒜 x * decompose 𝒜 y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜) x y
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_mul (x y : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (x * y) = (decompose 𝒜).symm x * (decompose 𝒜).symm y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm x y
end DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of a graded ring -/
def GradedRing.proj (i : ι) : A →+ A :=
(AddSubmonoidClass.subtype (𝒜 i)).comp <|
(DFinsupp.evalAddMonoidHom i).comp <|
RingHom.toAddMonoidHom <| RingEquiv.toRingHom <| DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜
@[simp]
theorem GradedRing.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedRing.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (DirectSum.of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedRing.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedRing.mem_support_iff [∀ (i) (x : 𝒜 i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedRing
section AddCancelMonoid
open DirectSum
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Semiring A] [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable {i j : ι}
namespace DirectSum
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_add]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 j) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 j using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_add]
theorem decompose_mul_add_left [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] (a : 𝒜 i) {b : A} :
decompose 𝒜 (↑a * b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ a (decompose 𝒜 b j) :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem 𝒜 a.2
theorem decompose_mul_add_right [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a : A} (b : 𝒜 j) :
decompose 𝒜 (a * ↑b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ (decompose 𝒜 a i) b :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem 𝒜 b.2
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) j : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 0 using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_mem_zero]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) i : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 0 using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_mem_zero]
end DirectSum
end AddCancelMonoid
section GradedAlgebra
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A)
/-- A special case of `GradedRing` with `σ = Submodule R A`. This is useful both because it
can avoid typeclass search, and because it provides a more concise name. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra :=
GradedRing 𝒜
/-- A helper to construct a `GradedAlgebra` when the `SetLike.GradedMonoid` structure is already
available. This makes the `left_inv` condition easier to prove, and phrases the `right_inv`
condition in a way that allows custom `@[ext]` lemmas to apply.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra.ofAlgHom [SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜] (decompose : A →ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i)
(right_inv : (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜).comp decompose = AlgHom.id R A)
(left_inv : ∀ i (x : 𝒜 i), decompose (x : A) = DirectSum.of (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) i x) :
GradedAlgebra 𝒜 where
decompose' := decompose
left_inv := AlgHom.congr_fun right_inv
right_inv := by
suffices decompose.comp (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜) = AlgHom.id _ _ from AlgHom.congr_fun this
ext i x : 2
exact (decompose.congr_arg <| DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of _ _ _).trans (left_inv i x)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
an algebra to a direct sum of components. -/
-- Porting note: deleted [simps] and added the corresponding lemmas by hand
def decomposeAlgEquiv : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
AlgEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := map_mul (coeAlgHom 𝒜)
commutes' := (coeAlgHom 𝒜).commutes }
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_apply (a : A) :
decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 a = decompose 𝒜 a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_symm_apply (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm a = (decompose 𝒜).symm a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decompose_algebraMap (r : R) :
decompose 𝒜 (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).commutes r
@[simp]
lemma decompose_symm_algebraMap (r : R) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r) = algebraMap R A r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm.commutes r
end DirectSum
open DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of graded algebra -/
def GradedAlgebra.proj (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜] (i : ι) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(𝒜 i).subtype.comp <| (DFinsupp.lapply i).comp <| (decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).toAlgHom.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedAlgebra.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedAlgebra.mem_support_iff [DecidableEq A] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans Submodule.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedAlgebra
section CanonicalOrder
open SetLike.GradedMonoid DirectSum
variable [Semiring A] [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [PartialOrder ι] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd ι]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ) [GradedRing 𝒜]
/-- If `A` is graded by a canonically ordered add monoid, then the projection map `x ↦ x₀` is a ring
homomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def GradedRing.projZeroRingHom : A →+* A where
toFun a := decompose 𝒜 a 0
map_one' :=
-- Porting note: qualified `one_mem`
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 SetLike.GradedOne.one_mem
map_zero' := by
simp only -- Porting note: added
rw [decompose_zero]
rfl
map_add' _ _ := by
simp only -- Porting note: added
rw [decompose_add]
rfl
map_mul' := by
refine DirectSum.Decomposition.inductionOn 𝒜 (fun x => ?_) ?_ ?_
· simp only [zero_mul, decompose_zero, zero_apply, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
· rintro i ⟨c, hc⟩
refine DirectSum.Decomposition.inductionOn 𝒜 ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [mul_zero, decompose_zero, zero_apply, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
· rintro j ⟨c', hc'⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk]
by_cases h : i + j = 0
· rw [decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜
(show c * c' ∈ 𝒜 0 from h ▸ SetLike.GradedMul.mul_mem hc hc'),
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 (show c ∈ 𝒜 0 from (add_eq_zero.mp h).1 ▸ hc),
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 (show c' ∈ 𝒜 0 from (add_eq_zero.mp h).2 ▸ hc')]
· rw [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 (SetLike.GradedMul.mul_mem hc hc') h]
rcases show i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 by rwa [add_eq_zero, not_and_or] at h with h' | h'
· simp only [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 hc h', zero_mul]
· simp only [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 hc' h', mul_zero]
· intro _ _ hd he
simp only at hd he -- Porting note: added
simp only [mul_add, decompose_add, add_apply, AddMemClass.coe_add, hd, he]
· rintro _ _ ha hb _
simp only at ha hb -- Porting note: added
simp only [add_mul, decompose_add, add_apply, AddMemClass.coe_add, ha, hb]
section GradeZero
/-- The ring homomorphism from `A` to `𝒜 0` sending every `a : A` to `a₀`. -/
def GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' : A →+* 𝒜 0 :=
((GradedRing.projZeroRingHom 𝒜).codRestrict _ fun _x => SetLike.coe_mem _ :
A →+* SetLike.GradeZero.subsemiring 𝒜)
@[simp] lemma GradedRing.coe_projZeroRingHom'_apply (a : A) :
(GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜 a : A) = GradedRing.projZeroRingHom 𝒜 a := rfl
@[simp] lemma GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_apply_coe (a : 𝒜 0) :
GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜 a = a := by
ext; simp only [coe_projZeroRingHom'_apply, projZeroRingHom_apply, decompose_coe, of_eq_same]
/-- The ring homomorphism `GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜` is surjective. -/
lemma GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_surjective :
Function.Surjective (GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective (GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_apply_coe 𝒜)
end GradeZero
variable {a b : A} {n i : ι}
namespace DirectSum
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_of_not_le (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = 0 := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_of_not_le (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = 0 := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le]
variable [Sub ι] [OrderedSub ι] [AddLeftReflectLE ι]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_of_le (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b (n - i) := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_of_le (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = decompose 𝒜 a (n - i) * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem (n) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = if i ≤ n then a * decompose 𝒜 b (n - i) else 0 := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem (n) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = if i ≤ n then decompose 𝒜 a (n - i) * b else 0 := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply]
end DirectSum
end CanonicalOrder
namespace DirectSum.IsInternal
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι]
variable {M : ι → Submodule R A} [SetLike.GradedMonoid M]
-- The following lines were given on Zulip by Adam Topaz
/-- The canonical isomorphism of an internal direct sum with the ambient algebra -/
noncomputable def coeAlgEquiv (hM : DirectSum.IsInternal M) :
| (DirectSum ι fun i => ↥(M i)) ≃ₐ[R] A :=
{ RingEquiv.ofBijective (DirectSum.coeAlgHom M) hM with commutes' := fun r => by simp }
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A` and a family `ι → Submodule R A` of submodules
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/Basic.lean | 358 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
/-!
# Casts for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the canonical injection from ℚ into an arbitrary division ring and prove various
casting lemmas showing the well-behavedness of this injection.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom, cast, coercion, casting
-/
assert_not_exists MulAction OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace NNRat
variable [DivisionSemiring α] {q r : ℚ≥0}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℚ≥0) : α) = n := by simp [cast_def]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : ℚ≥0) = (ofNat(n) : α) := cast_natCast _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : α) = 0 := (cast_natCast _).trans Nat.cast_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : α) = 1 := (cast_natCast _).trans Nat.cast_one
lemma cast_commute (q : ℚ≥0) (a : α) : Commute (↑q) a := by
simpa only [cast_def] using (q.num.cast_commute a).div_left (q.den.cast_commute a)
lemma commute_cast (a : α) (q : ℚ≥0) : Commute a q := (cast_commute ..).symm
lemma cast_comm (q : ℚ≥0) (a : α) : q * a = a * q := cast_commute _ _
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_divNat_of_ne_zero (a : ℕ) {b : ℕ} (hb : (b : α) ≠ 0) :
divNat a b = (a / b : α) := by
rcases e : divNat a b with ⟨⟨n, d, h, c⟩, hn⟩
rw [← Rat.num_nonneg] at hn
lift n to ℕ using hn
have hd : (d : α) ≠ 0 := by
refine fun hd ↦ hb ?_
have : Rat.divInt a b = _ := congr_arg NNRat.cast e
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : d ∣ b := by simpa [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, this] using Rat.den_dvd a b
simp [*]
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact hb Nat.cast_zero
have hd' : d ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact hd Nat.cast_zero
simp_rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, mk_divInt, divNat_inj hb' hd'] at e
rw [cast_def]
dsimp
rw [Commute.div_eq_div_iff _ hd hb]
· norm_cast
rw [e]
exact b.commute_cast _
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_add_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q + r) = (q + r : α) := by
rw [add_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, mul_comm _ q.den,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_add_div (Nat.commute_cast _ _) hq hr]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_mul_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q * r) = (q * r : α) := by
rw [mul_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Nat.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_inv_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.num : α) ≠ 0) : (q⁻¹ : ℚ≥0) = (q⁻¹ : α) := by
rw [inv_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero _ hq, cast_def, inv_div]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_div_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.num : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q / r) = (q / r : α) := by
rw [div_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, div_eq_mul_inv (_ / _),
inv_div, (Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Nat.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
end NNRat
namespace Rat
variable [DivisionRing α] {p q : ℚ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℚ) : α) = n :=
(cast_def _).trans <| show (n / (1 : ℕ) : α) = n by rw [Nat.cast_one, div_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℚ) : α) = n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, cast_intCast, Int.cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℚ) : α) = (ofNat(n) : α) := by
simp [cast_def]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℚ) : α) = 0 :=
(cast_intCast _).trans Int.cast_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one : ((1 : ℚ) : α) = 1 :=
(cast_intCast _).trans Int.cast_one
theorem cast_commute (r : ℚ) (a : α) : Commute (↑r) a := by
simpa only [cast_def] using (r.1.cast_commute a).div_left (r.2.cast_commute a)
theorem cast_comm (r : ℚ) (a : α) : (r : α) * a = a * r :=
(cast_commute r a).eq
theorem commute_cast (a : α) (r : ℚ) : Commute a r :=
(r.cast_commute a).symm
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_divInt_of_ne_zero (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (b0 : (b : α) ≠ 0) : (a /. b : α) = a / b := by
have b0' : b ≠ 0 := by
refine mt ?_ b0
simp +contextual
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
have d0 : (d : α) ≠ 0 := by
intro d0
have dd := den_dvd a b
rcases show (d : ℤ) ∣ b by rwa [e] at dd with ⟨k, ke⟩
have : (b : α) = (d : α) * (k : α) := by rw [ke, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [d0, zero_mul] at this
contradiction
rw [mk'_eq_divInt] at e
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℤ → α)
((divInt_eq_iff b0' <| ne_of_gt <| Int.natCast_pos.2 h.bot_lt).1 e)
rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast] at this
rw [eq_comm, cast_def, div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq d0, mul_assoc, (d.commute_cast _).eq,
← mul_assoc, this, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ b0, mul_one]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero (a : ℤ) {b : ℕ} (hb : (b : α) ≠ 0) : (mkRat a b : α) = a / b := by
rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, cast_divInt_of_ne_zero, Int.cast_natCast]; rwa [Int.cast_natCast]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_add_of_ne_zero {q r : ℚ} (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
(q + r : ℚ) = (q + r : α) := by
rw [add_def', cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, mul_comm r.num,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).div_add_div (Nat.commute_cast _ _) hq hr]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_neg (q : ℚ) : ↑(-q) = (-q : α) := by simp [cast_def, neg_div]
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_sub_of_ne_zero (hp : (p.den : α) ≠ 0) (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(p - q) = (p - q : α) := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_add_of_ne_zero, hp, hq]
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_mul_of_ne_zero (hp : (p.den : α) ≠ 0) (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(p * q) = (p * q : α) := by
rw [mul_eq_mkRat, cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Int.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hp hq
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_inv_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.num : α) ≠ 0) : ↑(q⁻¹) = (q⁻¹ : α) := by
rw [inv_def', cast_divInt_of_ne_zero _ hq, cast_def, inv_div, Int.cast_natCast]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Defs.lean | 190 | 190 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
/-!
# The submodule of elements `x : M` such that `f x = g x`
## Main declarations
* `LinearMap.eqLocus`: the submodule of elements `x : M` such that `f x = g x`
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module
-/
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*}
/-! ### Properties of linear maps -/
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
open Submodule
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- A linear map version of `AddMonoidHom.eqLocusM` -/
def eqLocus (f g : F) : Submodule R M :=
{ (f : M →+ M₂).eqLocusM g with
carrier := { x | f x = g x }
smul_mem' := fun {r} {x} (hx : _ = _) => show _ = _ by
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simpa only [map_smulₛₗ _] using congr_arg (τ₁₂ r • ·) hx }
@[simp]
theorem mem_eqLocus {x : M} {f g : F} : x ∈ eqLocus f g ↔ f x = g x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eqLocus_toAddSubmonoid (f g : F) :
(eqLocus f g).toAddSubmonoid = (f : M →+ M₂).eqLocusM g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqLocus_eq_top {f g : F} : eqLocus f g = ⊤ ↔ f = g := by
simp [SetLike.ext_iff, DFunLike.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eqLocus_same (f : F) : eqLocus f f = ⊤ := eqLocus_eq_top.2 rfl
|
theorem le_eqLocus {f g : F} {S : Submodule R M} : S ≤ eqLocus f g ↔ Set.EqOn f g S := Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/EqLocus.lean | 64 | 65 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Gabin Kolly
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.FinitelyGenerated
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Quotients
import Mathlib.Order.DirectedInverseSystem
/-!
# Direct Limits of First-Order Structures
This file constructs the direct limit of a directed system of first-order embeddings.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit G f` is the direct limit of the directed system `f` of
first-order embeddings between the structures indexed by `G`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.lift` is the universal property of the direct limit: maps
from the components to another module that respect the directed system structure give rise to
a unique map out of the direct limit.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.equiv_lift` is the equivalence between limits of
isomorphic direct systems.
-/
universe v w w' u₁ u₂
open FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure Set
variable {L : Language} {ι : Type v} [Preorder ι]
variable {G : ι → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G i)]
variable (f : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → G i ↪[L] G j)
namespace DirectedSystem
alias map_self := DirectedSystem.map_self'
alias map_map := DirectedSystem.map_map'
variable {G' : ℕ → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G' i)] (f' : ∀ n : ℕ, G' n ↪[L] G' (n + 1))
/-- Given a chain of embeddings of structures indexed by `ℕ`, defines a `DirectedSystem` by
composing them. -/
def natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : G' m ↪[L] G' n :=
Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k g => (f' k).comp g) (Embedding.refl L _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(natLERec f' m n h : G' m → G' n) = Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k => f' k) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
ext x
induction' k with k ih
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_self, Embedding.refl_apply, Nat.leRecOn_self]
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, ← natLERec,
Embedding.comp_apply, ih]
instance natLERec.directedSystem : DirectedSystem G' fun i j h => natLERec f' i j h :=
⟨fun _ _ => congr (congr rfl (Nat.leRecOn_self _)) rfl,
fun _ _ _ hij hjk => by simp [Nat.leRecOn_trans hij hjk]⟩
end DirectedSystem
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Alias for `Σ i, G i`.
Instead of `Σ i, G i`, we use the alias `Language.Structure.Sigma` which depends on `f`.
This way, Lean can infer what `L` and `f` are in the `Setoid` instance.
Otherwise we have a "cannot find synthesization order" error.
See also the discussion at
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/local.20instance.20cannot.20find.20synthesization.20order.20in.20porting
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
protected abbrev Structure.Sigma (f : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → G i ↪[L] G j) := Σ i, G i
local notation "Σˣ" => Structure.Sigma
/-- Constructor for `FirstOrder.Language.Structure.Sigma` alias. -/
abbrev Structure.Sigma.mk (i : ι) (x : G i) : Σˣ f := ⟨i, x⟩
namespace DirectLimit
/-- Raises a family of elements in the `Σ`-type to the same level along the embeddings. -/
def unify {α : Type*} (x : α → Σˣ f) (i : ι) (h : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x)))
(a : α) : G i :=
f (x a).1 i (h (mem_range_self a)) (x a).2
variable [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h]
@[simp]
theorem unify_sigma_mk_self {α : Type*} {i : ι} {x : α → G i} :
(unify f (fun a => .mk f i (x a)) i fun _ ⟨_, hj⟩ =>
_root_.trans (le_of_eq hj.symm) (refl _)) = x := by
ext a
rw [unify]
apply DirectedSystem.map_self
theorem comp_unify {α : Type*} {x : α → Σˣ f} {i j : ι} (ij : i ≤ j)
(h : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
f i j ij ∘ unify f x i h = unify f x j
fun k hk => _root_.trans (mem_upperBounds.1 h k hk) ij := by
ext a
simp [unify, DirectedSystem.map_map]
end DirectLimit
variable (G)
namespace DirectLimit
/-- The directed limit glues together the structures along the embeddings. -/
def setoid [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] : Setoid (Σˣ f) where
r := fun ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ => ∃ (k : ι) (ik : i ≤ k) (jk : j ≤ k), f i k ik x = f j k jk y
iseqv :=
⟨fun ⟨i, _⟩ => ⟨i, refl i, refl i, rfl⟩, @fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨k, ik, jk, h⟩ =>
⟨k, jk, ik, h.symm⟩,
@fun ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ ⟨k, z⟩ ⟨ij, hiij, hjij, hij⟩ ⟨jk, hjjk, hkjk, hjk⟩ => by
obtain ⟨ijk, hijijk, hjkijk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) ij jk
refine ⟨ijk, le_trans hiij hijijk, le_trans hkjk hjkijk, ?_⟩
rw [← DirectedSystem.map_map, hij, DirectedSystem.map_map]
· symm
rw [← DirectedSystem.map_map, ← hjk, DirectedSystem.map_map]
assumption
assumption⟩
/-- The structure on the `Σ`-type which becomes the structure on the direct limit after quotienting.
-/
noncomputable def sigmaStructure [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Nonempty ι] : L.Structure (Σˣ f) where
funMap F x :=
⟨_,
funMap F
(unify f x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1))
(Classical.choose_spec (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)))⟩
RelMap R x :=
RelMap R
(unify f x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1))
(Classical.choose_spec (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)))
end DirectLimit
/-- The direct limit of a directed system is the structures glued together along the embeddings. -/
def DirectLimit [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] :=
Quotient (DirectLimit.setoid G f)
attribute [local instance] DirectLimit.setoid DirectLimit.sigmaStructure
instance [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Inhabited ι]
[Inhabited (G default)] : Inhabited (DirectLimit G f) :=
⟨⟦⟨default, default⟩⟧⟩
namespace DirectLimit
variable [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h]
theorem equiv_iff {x y : Σˣ f} {i : ι} (hx : x.1 ≤ i) (hy : y.1 ≤ i) :
x ≈ y ↔ (f x.1 i hx) x.2 = (f y.1 i hy) y.2 := by
cases x
cases y
refine ⟨fun xy => ?_, fun xy => ⟨i, hx, hy, xy⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j, _, _, h⟩ := xy
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
have h := congr_arg (f j k jk) h
apply (f i k ik).injective
rw [DirectedSystem.map_map, DirectedSystem.map_map] at *
exact h
theorem funMap_unify_equiv {n : ℕ} (F : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i j : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) (hj : j ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
Structure.Sigma.mk f i (funMap F (unify f x i hi)) ≈ .mk f j (funMap F (unify f x j hj)) := by
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
refine ⟨k, ik, jk, ?_⟩
rw [(f i k ik).map_fun, (f j k jk).map_fun, comp_unify, comp_unify]
theorem relMap_unify_equiv {n : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i j : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) (hj : j ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
RelMap R (unify f x i hi) = RelMap R (unify f x j hj) := by
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
rw [← (f i k ik).map_rel, comp_unify, ← (f j k jk).map_rel, comp_unify]
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem exists_unify_eq {α : Type*} [Finite α] {x y : α → Σˣ f} (xy : x ≈ y) :
∃ (i : ι) (hx : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x)))
(hy : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ y))), unify f x i hx = unify f y i hy := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Finite.bddAbove_range (Sum.elim (fun a => (x a).1) fun a => (y a).1)
rw [Sum.elim_range, upperBounds_union] at hi
simp_rw [← Function.comp_apply (f := Sigma.fst)] at hi
exact ⟨i, hi.1, hi.2, funext fun a => (equiv_iff G f _ _).1 (xy a)⟩
theorem funMap_equiv_unify {n : ℕ} (F : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
funMap F x ≈ .mk f _ (funMap F (unify f x i hi)) :=
funMap_unify_equiv G f F x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)) i _ hi
theorem relMap_equiv_unify {n : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
RelMap R x = RelMap R (unify f x i hi) :=
relMap_unify_equiv G f R x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)) i _ hi
/-- The direct limit `setoid` respects the structure `sigmaStructure`, so quotienting by it
gives rise to a valid structure. -/
noncomputable instance prestructure : L.Prestructure (DirectLimit.setoid G f) where
toStructure := sigmaStructure G f
fun_equiv {n} {F} x y xy := by
obtain ⟨i, hx, hy, h⟩ := exists_unify_eq G f xy
refine
Setoid.trans (funMap_equiv_unify G f F x i hx)
(Setoid.trans ?_ (Setoid.symm (funMap_equiv_unify G f F y i hy)))
rw [h]
rel_equiv {n} {R} x y xy := by
obtain ⟨i, hx, hy, h⟩ := exists_unify_eq G f xy
refine _root_.trans (relMap_equiv_unify G f R x i hx)
(_root_.trans ?_ (symm (relMap_equiv_unify G f R y i hy)))
rw [h]
/-- The `L.Structure` on a direct limit of `L.Structure`s. -/
noncomputable instance instStructureDirectLimit : L.Structure (DirectLimit G f) :=
Language.quotientStructure
@[simp]
theorem funMap_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk' {n : ℕ} {F : L.Functions n} {i : ι} {x : Fin n → G i} :
funMap F (fun a => (⟦.mk f i (x a)⟧ : DirectLimit G f)) = ⟦.mk f i (funMap F x)⟧ := by
simp only [funMap_quotient_mk', Quotient.eq]
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ :=
directed_of (· ≤ ·) i (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun _ : Fin n => i))
refine ⟨k, jk, ik, ?_⟩
simp only [Embedding.map_fun, comp_unify]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relMap_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk' {n : ℕ} {R : L.Relations n} {i : ι} {x : Fin n → G i} :
RelMap R (fun a => (⟦.mk f i (x a)⟧ : DirectLimit G f)) = RelMap R x := by
rw [relMap_quotient_mk']
obtain ⟨k, _, _⟩ :=
directed_of (· ≤ ·) i (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun _ : Fin n => i))
rw [relMap_equiv_unify G f R (fun a => .mk f i (x a)) i]
rw [unify_sigma_mk_self]
theorem exists_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk'_eq {α : Type*} [Finite α] (x : α → DirectLimit G f) :
∃ (i : ι) (y : α → G i), x = fun a => ⟦.mk f i (y a)⟧ := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).out.1
refine ⟨i, unify f (Quotient.out ∘ x) i hi, ?_⟩
ext a
rw [Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out, unify]
generalize_proofs r
change _ ≈ Structure.Sigma.mk f i (f (Quotient.out (x a)).fst i r (Quotient.out (x a)).snd)
have : (.mk f i (f (Quotient.out (x a)).fst i r (Quotient.out (x a)).snd) : Σˣ f).fst ≤ i :=
le_rfl
rw [equiv_iff G f (i := i) (hi _) this]
· simp only [DirectedSystem.map_self]
exact ⟨a, rfl⟩
variable (L ι)
/-- The canonical map from a component to the direct limit. -/
def of (i : ι) : G i ↪[L] DirectLimit G f where
toFun := fun a => ⟦.mk f i a⟧
inj' x y h := by
rw [Quotient.eq] at h
obtain ⟨j, h1, _, h3⟩ := h
exact (f i j h1).injective h3
map_fun' F x := by
rw [← funMap_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk']
rfl
map_rel' := by
intro n R x
change RelMap R (fun a => (⟦.mk f i (x a)⟧ : DirectLimit G f)) ↔ _
simp only [relMap_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk']
variable {L ι G f}
@[simp]
theorem of_apply {i : ι} {x : G i} : of L ι G f i x = ⟦.mk f i x⟧ :=
rfl
-- This is not a simp-lemma because it is not in simp-normal form,
-- but the simp-normal version of this theorem would not be useful.
theorem of_f {i j : ι} {hij : i ≤ j} {x : G i} : of L ι G f j (f i j hij x) = of L ι G f i x := by
rw [of_apply, of_apply, Quotient.eq]
refine Setoid.symm ⟨j, hij, refl j, ?_⟩
simp only [DirectedSystem.map_self]
/-- Every element of the direct limit corresponds to some element in
some component of the directed system. -/
theorem exists_of (z : DirectLimit G f) : ∃ i x, of L ι G f i x = z :=
⟨z.out.1, z.out.2, by simp⟩
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn {C : DirectLimit G f → Prop} (z : DirectLimit G f)
(ih : ∀ i x, C (of L ι G f i x)) : C z :=
let ⟨i, x, h⟩ := exists_of z
h ▸ ih i x
theorem iSup_range_of_eq_top : ⨆ i, (of L ι G f i).toHom.range = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 (fun x _ ↦ DirectLimit.inductionOn x
(fun i _ ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ Hom.range (Embedding.toHom (of L ι G f i))) i (mem_range_self _)))
/-- Every finitely generated substructure of the direct limit corresponds to some
substructure in some component of the directed system. -/
theorem exists_fg_substructure_in_Sigma (S : L.Substructure (DirectLimit G f)) (S_fg : S.FG) :
∃ i, ∃ T : L.Substructure (G i), T.map (of L ι G f i).toHom = S := by
let ⟨A, A_closure⟩ := S_fg
let ⟨i, y, eq_y⟩ := exists_quotient_mk'_sigma_mk'_eq G _ (fun a : A ↦ a.1)
use i
use Substructure.closure L (range y)
rw [Substructure.map_closure]
simp only [Embedding.coe_toHom, of_apply]
rw [← image_univ, image_image, image_univ, ← eq_y,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, A_closure]
variable {P : Type u₁} [L.Structure P]
variable (L ι G f) in
/-- The universal property of the direct limit: maps from the components to another module
that respect the directed system structure (i.e. make some diagram commute) give rise
to a unique map out of the direct limit. -/
def lift (g : ∀ i, G i ↪[L] P) (Hg : ∀ i j hij x, g j (f i j hij x) = g i x) :
DirectLimit G f ↪[L] P where
toFun :=
Quotient.lift (fun x : Σˣ f => (g x.1) x.2) fun x y xy => by
simp only
obtain ⟨i, hx, hy⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) x.1 y.1
| rw [← Hg x.1 i hx, ← Hg y.1 i hy]
exact congr_arg _ ((equiv_iff ..).1 xy)
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/DirectLimit.lean | 334 | 335 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
In the above, the pairing function is primitive recursive by definition.
This deviates from the textbook definition of primitive recursive functions,
which instead work with *`n`-ary* functions. We formalize the textbook
definition in `Nat.Primrec'`. `Nat.Primrec'.prim_iff` then proves it is
equivalent to our chosen formulation. For more discussionn of this and
other design choices in this formalization, see [carneiro2019].
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions `f : ℕ → ℕ`
- `Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Primcodable α`: well-behaved encoding of `α` into `ℕ`, i.e. one such that roundtripping through
the encoding functions adds no computational power
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is, essentially, an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive.
However, such a definition is circular.
Instead, we ask that the composition of `decode : ℕ → Option α` with
`encode : Option α → ℕ` is primitive recursive. Said composition is
the identity function, restricted to the image of `encode`.
Thus, in a way, the added requirement ensures that no predicates
can be smuggled in through a cunning choice of the subset of `ℕ` into
which the type is encoded. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e.symm :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 (show Primrec fun a => encode (e (e.symm a)) by simp [Primrec.encode])
theorem of_equiv_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → β} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv_symm.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv_symm_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e.symm (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv_symm.comp⟩
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance prod {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primcodable (α × β) :=
⟨((casesOn' zero ((casesOn' zero .succ).comp (pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1; · simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem fst {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.fst α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp left)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem snd {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.snd α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp right)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem pair {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => (f a, g a) :=
((casesOn1 0
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp <|
.pair (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf) (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hg))).comp
(@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq
fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem unpair : Primrec Nat.unpair :=
(pair (nat_iff.2 .left) (nat_iff.2 .right)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem list_getElem?₁ : ∀ l : List α, Primrec (l[·]? : ℕ → Option α)
| [] => dom_denumerable.2 zero
| a :: l =>
dom_denumerable.2 <|
(casesOn1 (encode a).succ <| dom_denumerable.1 <| list_getElem?₁ l).of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get?₁ := list_getElem?₁
end Primrec
/-- `Primrec₂ f` means `f` is a binary primitive recursive function.
This is technically unnecessary since we can always curry all
the arguments together, but there are enough natural two-arg
functions that it is convenient to express this directly. -/
def Primrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- `PrimrecPred p` means `p : α → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive predicate, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :=
Primrec fun a => decide (p a)
/-- `PrimrecRel p` means `p : α → β → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive relation, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → β → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecRel {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (s : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] :=
Primrec₂ fun a b => decide (s a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Primrec₂ f := hf
theorem of_eq {f g : α → β → σ} (hg : Primrec₂ f) (H : ∀ a b, f a b = g a b) : Primrec₂ g :=
(by funext a b; apply H : f = g) ▸ hg
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (_ : β) => x :=
Primrec.const _
protected theorem pair : Primrec₂ (@Prod.mk α β) :=
Primrec.pair .fst .snd
theorem left : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (_ : β) => a :=
.fst
theorem right : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (b : β) => b :=
.snd
theorem natPair : Primrec₂ Nat.pair := by simp [Primrec₂, Primrec]; constructor
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ → α} : Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.comp natPair, fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} : Nat.Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
theorem encode_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => encode (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.encode_iff
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => some (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.option_some_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β σ} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔ Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => f (ofNat α m) (ofNat β n) :=
(Primrec.ofNat_iff.trans <| by simp).trans unpaired
theorem uncurry {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec (Function.uncurry f) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
rw [show Function.uncurry f = fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 from funext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => rfl]; rfl
theorem curry {f : α × β → σ} : Primrec₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ Primrec f := by
rw [← uncurry, Function.uncurry_curry]
end Primrec₂
section Comp
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem Primrec.comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem Primrec₂.comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec h) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
Primrec.comp hf (hg.pair hh)
theorem Primrec₂.comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Primrec₂ f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
theorem PrimrecPred.comp {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α → β} :
PrimrecPred p → Primrec f → PrimrecPred fun a => p (f a) :=
Primrec.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp {R : β → γ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec f → Primrec g → PrimrecPred fun a => R (f a) (g a) :=
Primrec₂.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp₂ {R : γ → δ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β → γ}
{g : α → β → δ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec₂ f → Primrec₂ g → PrimrecRel fun a b => R (f a b) (g a b) :=
PrimrecRel.comp
end Comp
theorem PrimrecPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : PrimrecPred q :=
Primrec.of_eq hp fun a => Bool.decide_congr (H a)
theorem PrimrecRel.of_eq {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {r s : α → β → Prop}
[∀ a b, Decidable (r a b)] [∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] (hr : PrimrecRel r)
(H : ∀ a b, r a b ↔ s a b) : PrimrecRel s :=
Primrec₂.of_eq hr fun a b => Bool.decide_congr (H a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem swap {f : α → β → σ} (h : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec₂ (swap f) :=
h.comp₂ Primrec₂.right Primrec₂.left
theorem nat_iff {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ Nat.Primrec
(.unpaired fun m n => encode <| (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) := by
have :
∀ (a : Option α) (b : Option β),
Option.map (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2)
(Option.bind a fun a : α => Option.map (Prod.mk a) b) =
Option.bind a fun a => Option.map (f a) b := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
simp [Primrec₂, Primrec, this]
theorem nat_iff' {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔
Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => Option.map (f a) (@decode β _ n) :=
nat_iff.trans <| unpaired'.trans encode_iff
end Primrec₂
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun _ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ × β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => n.rec (motive := fun _ => β) (f a) fun n IH => g a (n, IH) :=
Primrec₂.nat_iff.2 <|
((Nat.Primrec.casesOn' .zero <|
(Nat.Primrec.prec hf <|
.comp hg <|
Nat.Primrec.left.pair <|
(Nat.Primrec.left.comp .right).pair <|
Nat.Primrec.pred.comp <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp .right).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.right.pair <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp Nat.Primrec.left).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.id.pair <| (@Primcodable.prim α).comp Nat.Primrec.left).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, id_eq, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val, decode_nat,
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map, Option.map_some']
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one, encode_some, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, encodek, Option.map_some',
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map]
induction' n.unpair.2 with m <;> simp [encodek]
simp [*, encodek]
theorem nat_rec' {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ × β → β}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).rec (motive := fun _ => β) (g a) fun n IH => h a (n, IH) :=
(nat_rec hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_rec₁ {f : ℕ → α → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec (Nat.rec a f) :=
nat_rec' .id (const a) <| comp₂ hf Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn (f a) (g a) : β) :=
nat_rec hf <| hg.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| comp₂ fst Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => ((f a).casesOn (g a) (h a) : β) :=
(nat_casesOn' hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_casesOn₁ {f : ℕ → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec f) :
Primrec (fun (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn a f : α)) :=
nat_casesOn .id (const a) (comp₂ hf .right)
theorem nat_iterate {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => (h a)^[f a] (g a) :=
(nat_rec' hf hg (hh.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq fun a => by
induction f a <;> simp [*, -Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Primrec o)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
encode_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (encode_iff.2 hf) <|
pred.comp₂ <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.2 <|
(Primrec₂.nat_iff'.1 hg).comp₂ ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp fst).to₂
Primrec₂.right).of_eq
fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_bind₁ {f : α → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun o => Option.bind o f :=
option_bind .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)).of_eq fun x => by cases f x <;> rfl
theorem option_map₁ {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec (Option.map f) :=
option_map .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_iget [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@Option.iget α _) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const <| @default α _) .right).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_isSome : Primrec (@Option.isSome α) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const false) (const true).to₂).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_getD : Primrec₂ (@Option.getD α) :=
Primrec.of_eq (option_casesOn Primrec₂.left Primrec₂.right .right) fun ⟨o, a⟩ => by
cases o <;> rfl
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).bind (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [encodek] using h.comp fst ((@Primrec.encode β _).comp snd), fun h =>
option_bind (Primrec.decode.comp snd) <| h.comp (fst.comp fst) snd⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
simp only [Option.map_eq_bind]
exact bind_decode_iff.trans Primrec₂.option_some_iff
theorem nat_add : Primrec₂ ((· + ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.add
theorem nat_sub : Primrec₂ ((· - ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.sub
theorem nat_mul : Primrec₂ ((· * ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.mul
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Primrec c) (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => bif (c a) then (f a) else (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem ite {c : α → Prop} [DecidablePred c] {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : PrimrecPred c)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => if c a then f a else g a := by
simpa [Bool.cond_decide] using cond hc hf hg
theorem nat_le : PrimrecRel ((· ≤ ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_casesOn nat_sub (const true) (const false).to₂).of_eq fun p => by
dsimp [swap]
rcases e : p.1 - p.2 with - | n
· simp [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 e]
· simp [not_le.2 (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e)]
theorem nat_min : Primrec₂ (@min ℕ _) :=
ite nat_le fst snd
theorem nat_max : Primrec₂ (@max ℕ _) :=
ite (nat_le.comp fst snd) snd fst
theorem dom_bool (f : Bool → α) : Primrec f :=
(cond .id (const (f true)) (const (f false))).of_eq fun b => by cases b <;> rfl
theorem dom_bool₂ (f : Bool → Bool → α) : Primrec₂ f :=
(cond fst ((dom_bool (f true)).comp snd) ((dom_bool (f false)).comp snd)).of_eq fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
cases a <;> rfl
protected theorem not : Primrec not :=
dom_bool _
protected theorem and : Primrec₂ and :=
dom_bool₂ _
protected theorem or : Primrec₂ or :=
dom_bool₂ _
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.not {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) :
PrimrecPred fun a => ¬p a :=
(Primrec.not.comp hp).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.and {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∧ q a :=
(Primrec.and.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.or {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∨ q a :=
(Primrec.or.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem beq [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@BEq.beq α _) :=
have : PrimrecRel fun a b : ℕ => a = b :=
(PrimrecPred.and nat_le nat_le.swap).of_eq fun a => by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
(this.comp₂ (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
fun _ _ => encode_injective.eq_iff
protected theorem eq [DecidableEq α] : PrimrecRel (@Eq α) := Primrec.beq
theorem nat_lt : PrimrecRel ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_le.comp snd fst).not.of_eq fun p => by simp
theorem option_guard {p : α → β → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (p a b)] (hp : PrimrecRel p) {f : α → β}
(hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun a => Option.guard (p a) (f a) :=
ite (hp.comp Primrec.id hf) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (const none)
theorem option_orElse : Primrec₂ ((· <|> ·) : Option α → Option α → Option α) :=
(option_casesOn fst snd (fst.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun ⟨o₁, o₂⟩ => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> rfl
protected theorem decode₂ : Primrec (decode₂ α) :=
option_bind .decode <|
option_guard (Primrec.beq.comp₂ (by exact encode_iff.mpr snd) (by exact fst.comp fst)) snd
theorem list_findIdx₁ {p : α → β → Bool} (hp : Primrec₂ p) :
∀ l : List β, Primrec fun a => l.findIdx (p a)
| [] => const 0
| a :: l => (cond (hp.comp .id (const a)) (const 0) (succ.comp (list_findIdx₁ hp l))).of_eq fun n =>
by simp [List.findIdx_cons]
theorem list_idxOf₁ [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) : Primrec fun a => l.idxOf a :=
list_findIdx₁ (.swap .beq) l
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf₁ := list_idxOf₁
theorem dom_fintype [Finite α] (f : α → σ) : Primrec f :=
let ⟨l, _, m⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
option_some_iff.1 <| by
haveI := decidableEqOfEncodable α
refine ((list_getElem?₁ (l.map f)).comp (list_idxOf₁ l)).of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_idxOf (m a), Option.map_some']
-- Porting note: These are new lemmas
-- I added it because it actually simplified the proofs
-- and because I couldn't understand the original proof
/-- A function is `PrimrecBounded` if its size is bounded by a primitive recursive function -/
def PrimrecBounded (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → ℕ, Primrec g ∧ ∀ x, encode (f x) ≤ g x
theorem nat_findGreatest {f : α → ℕ} {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x n, Decidable (p x n)]
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : PrimrecRel p) : Primrec fun x => (f x).findGreatest (p x) :=
(nat_rec' (h := fun x nih => if p x (nih.1 + 1) then nih.1 + 1 else nih.2)
hf (const 0) (ite (hp.comp fst (snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp))
(snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp) (snd.comp snd))).of_eq fun x => by
induction f x <;> simp [Nat.findGreatest, *]
/-- To show a function `f : α → ℕ` is primitive recursive, it is enough to show that the function
is bounded by a primitive recursive function and that its graph is primitive recursive -/
theorem of_graph {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : PrimrecBounded f)
(h₂ : PrimrecRel fun a b => f a = b) : Primrec f := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨g, pg, hg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x⟩
refine (nat_findGreatest pg h₂).of_eq fun n => ?_
exact (Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun b => f n = b) (hg n) rfl).symm
-- We show that division is primitive recursive by showing that the graph is
theorem nat_div : Primrec₂ ((· / ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) := by
refine of_graph ⟨_, fst, fun p => Nat.div_le_self _ _⟩ ?_
have : PrimrecRel fun (a : ℕ × ℕ) (b : ℕ) => (a.2 = 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨
(0 < a.2 ∧ b * a.2 ≤ a.1 ∧ a.1 < (b + 1) * a.2) :=
PrimrecPred.or
(.and (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp (fst |> snd.comp)) (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp snd))
(.and (nat_lt.comp (const 0) (fst |> snd.comp)) <|
.and (nat_le.comp (nat_mul.comp snd (fst |> snd.comp)) (fst |> fst.comp))
(nat_lt.comp (fst.comp fst) (nat_mul.comp (Primrec.succ.comp snd) (snd.comp fst))))
refine this.of_eq ?_
rintro ⟨a, k⟩ q
if H : k = 0 then simp [H, eq_comm]
else
have : q * k ≤ a ∧ a < (q + 1) * k ↔ q = a / k := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← (@Nat.lt_succ _ q), Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H),
Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H)]
simpa [H, zero_lt_iff, eq_comm (b := q)]
theorem nat_mod : Primrec₂ ((· % ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
(nat_sub.comp fst (nat_mul.comp snd nat_div)).to₂.of_eq fun m n => by
apply Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add
simp [add_comm (m % n), Nat.div_add_mod]
theorem nat_bodd : Primrec Nat.bodd :=
(Primrec.beq.comp (nat_mod.comp .id (const 2)) (const 1)).of_eq fun n => by
cases H : n.bodd <;> simp [Nat.mod_two_of_bodd, H]
theorem nat_div2 : Primrec Nat.div2 :=
(nat_div.comp .id (const 2)).of_eq fun n => n.div2_val.symm
theorem nat_double : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n) :=
nat_mul.comp (const _) Primrec.id
theorem nat_double_succ : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n + 1) :=
nat_double |> Primrec.succ.comp
end Primrec
section
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
variable (H : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (@decode (List β) _ n))
open Primrec
private def prim : Primcodable (List β) := ⟨H⟩
private theorem list_casesOn' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
letI := prim H
have :
@Primrec _ (Option σ) _ _ fun a =>
(@decode (Option (β × List β)) _ (encode (f a))).map fun o => Option.casesOn o (g a) (h a) :=
((@map_decode_iff _ (Option (β × List β)) _ _ _ _ _).2 <|
to₂ <|
option_casesOn snd (hg.comp fst) (hh.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) Primrec₂.right)).comp
.id (encode_iff.2 hf)
option_some_iff.1 <| this.of_eq fun a => by rcases f a with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [encodek]
private theorem list_foldl' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) := by
letI := prim H
let G (a : α) (IH : σ × List β) : σ × List β := List.casesOn IH.2 IH fun b l => (h a (IH.1, b), l)
have hG : Primrec₂ G := list_casesOn' H (snd.comp snd) snd <|
to₂ <|
pair (hh.comp (fst.comp fst) <| pair ((fst.comp snd).comp fst) (fst.comp snd))
(snd.comp snd)
let F := fun (a : α) (n : ℕ) => (G a)^[n] (g a, f a)
have hF : Primrec fun a => (F a (encode (f a))).1 :=
(fst.comp <|
nat_iterate (encode_iff.2 hf) (pair hg hf) <|
hG)
suffices ∀ a n, F a n = (((f a).take n).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a), (f a).drop n) by
refine hF.of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [this, List.take_of_length_le (length_le_encode _)]
introv
dsimp only [F]
generalize f a = l
generalize g a = x
induction n generalizing l x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n IH =>
simp only [iterate_succ, comp_apply]
rcases l with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [G, IH]
private theorem list_cons' : (haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ (@List.cons β)) :=
letI := prim H
encode_iff.1 (succ.comp <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 fst) (encode_iff.2 snd))
private theorem list_reverse' :
haveI := prim H
Primrec (@List.reverse β) :=
letI := prim H
(list_foldl' H .id (const []) <| to₂ <| ((list_cons' H).comp snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
(suffices ∀ l r, List.foldl (fun (s : List β) (b : β) => b :: s) r l = List.reverseAux l r from
fun l => this l []
fun l => by induction l <;> simp [*, List.reverseAux])
end
namespace Primcodable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β]
open Primrec
instance sum : Primcodable (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨Primrec.nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2
(cond nat_bodd
(((@Primrec.decode β _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double_succ.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd))
(((@Primrec.decode α _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd)))).of_eq
fun n =>
show _ = encode (decodeSum n) by
simp only [decodeSum, Nat.boddDiv2_eq]
cases Nat.bodd n <;> simp [decodeSum]
· cases @decode α _ n.div2 <;> rfl
· cases @decode β _ n.div2 <;> rfl⟩
instance list : Primcodable (List α) :=
⟨letI H := @Primcodable.prim (List ℕ) _
have : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (o : Option (List ℕ)) => o.map (List.cons (encode a)) :=
option_map snd <| (list_cons' H).comp ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp (fst.comp fst)) snd
have :
Primrec fun n =>
(ofNat (List ℕ) n).reverse.foldl
(fun o m => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => o.map (List.cons (encode a))) (some []) :=
list_foldl' H ((list_reverse' H).comp (.ofNat (List ℕ))) (const (some []))
(Primrec.comp₂ (bind_decode_iff.2 <| .swap this) Primrec₂.right)
nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2 this).of_eq fun n => by
rw [List.foldl_reverse]
apply Nat.case_strong_induction_on n; · simp
intro n IH; simp
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq, Option.some_bind, Option.map_some']
suffices ∀ (o : Option (List ℕ)) (p), encode o = encode p →
encode (Option.map (List.cons (encode a)) o) = encode (Option.map (List.cons a) p) from
this _ _ (IH _ (Nat.unpair_right_le n))
intro o p IH
cases o <;> cases p
· rfl
· injection IH
· injection IH
· exact congr_arg (fun k => (Nat.pair (encode a) k).succ.succ) (Nat.succ.inj IH)⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem sumInl : Primrec (@Sum.inl α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double.comp Primrec.encode
theorem sumInr : Primrec (@Sum.inr α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double_succ.comp Primrec.encode
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Primrec.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Primrec.sumInr
theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by rcases f a with b | c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val, encodek]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := Primrec.sumCasesOn
theorem list_cons : Primrec₂ (@List.cons α) :=
list_cons' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_casesOn {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g →
Primrec₂ h → @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
list_casesOn' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_foldl {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g → Primrec₂ h → Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) :=
list_foldl' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_reverse : Primrec (@List.reverse α) :=
list_reverse' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_foldr {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldr (fun b s => h a (b, s)) (g a) :=
(list_foldl (list_reverse.comp hf) hg <| to₂ <| hh.comp fst <| (pair snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
fun a => by simp [List.foldl_reverse]
theorem list_head? : Primrec (@List.head? α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const none) (option_some_iff.2 <| fst.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by
cases l <;> rfl
theorem list_headI [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@List.headI α _) :=
(option_iget.comp list_head?).of_eq fun l => l.head!_eq_head?.symm
theorem list_tail : Primrec (@List.tail α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const []) (snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
theorem list_rec {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH) :=
let F (a : α) := (f a).foldr (fun (b : β) (s : List β × σ) => (b :: s.1, h a (b, s))) ([], g a)
have : Primrec F :=
list_foldr hf (pair (const []) hg) <|
to₂ <| pair ((list_cons.comp fst (fst.comp snd)).comp snd) hh
(snd.comp this).of_eq fun a => by
suffices F a = (f a, List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH)) by rw [this]
dsimp [F]
induction' f a with b l IH <;> simp [*]
theorem list_getElem? : Primrec₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
let F (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :=
l.foldl
(fun (s : ℕ ⊕ α) (a : α) =>
Sum.casesOn s (@Nat.casesOn (fun _ => ℕ ⊕ α) · (Sum.inr a) Sum.inl) Sum.inr)
(Sum.inl n)
have hF : Primrec₂ F :=
(list_foldl fst (sumInl.comp snd)
((sumCasesOn fst (nat_casesOn snd (sumInr.comp <| snd.comp fst) (sumInl.comp snd).to₂).to₂
(sumInr.comp snd).to₂).comp
snd).to₂).to₂
have :
@Primrec _ (Option α) _ _ fun p : List α × ℕ => Sum.casesOn (F p.1 p.2) (fun _ => none) some :=
sumCasesOn hF (const none).to₂ (option_some.comp snd).to₂
this.to₂.of_eq fun l n => by
dsimp; symm
induction' l with a l IH generalizing n; · rfl
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [F]
clear IH
induction' l with _ l IH <;> simp_all
· simpa using IH ..
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_getD (d : α) : Primrec₂ fun l n => List.getD l n d := by
simp only [List.getD_eq_getElem?_getD]
exact option_getD.comp₂ list_getElem? (const _)
theorem list_getI [Inhabited α] : Primrec₂ (@List.getI α _) :=
list_getD _
theorem list_append : Primrec₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
(list_foldr fst snd <| to₂ <| comp (@list_cons α _) snd).to₂.of_eq fun l₁ l₂ => by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
theorem list_concat : Primrec₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
list_append.comp fst (list_cons.comp snd (const []))
theorem list_map {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const []) <|
to₂ <| list_cons.comp (hg.comp fst (fst.comp snd)) (snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem list_range : Primrec List.range :=
(nat_rec' .id (const []) ((list_concat.comp snd fst).comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun n => by
simp; induction n <;> simp [*, List.range_succ]
theorem list_flatten : Primrec (@List.flatten α) :=
(list_foldr .id (const []) <| to₂ <| comp (@list_append α _) snd).of_eq fun l => by
dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem list_flatMap {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → List σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec (fun a => (f a).flatMap (g a)) := list_flatten.comp (list_map hf hg)
theorem optionToList : Primrec (Option.toList : Option α → List α) :=
(option_casesOn Primrec.id (const [])
((list_cons.comp Primrec.id (const [])).comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
(fun o => by rcases o <;> simp)
theorem listFilterMap {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → Option σ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) : Primrec fun a => (f a).filterMap (g a) :=
(list_flatMap hf (comp₂ optionToList hg)).of_eq
fun _ ↦ Eq.symm <| List.filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList _ _
theorem list_length : Primrec (@List.length α) :=
(list_foldr (@Primrec.id (List α) _) (const 0) <| to₂ <| (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq
fun l => by dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem list_findIdx {f : α → List β} {p : α → β → Bool}
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : Primrec₂ p) : Primrec fun a => (f a).findIdx (p a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const 0) <|
to₂ <| cond (hp.comp fst <| fst.comp snd) (const 0) (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by dsimp; induction f a <;> simp [List.findIdx_cons, *]
theorem list_idxOf [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@List.idxOf α _) :=
to₂ <| list_findIdx snd <| Primrec.beq.comp₂ snd.to₂ (fst.comp fst).to₂
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf := list_idxOf
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = some (f a n)) : Primrec₂ f :=
suffices Primrec₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a n => by
simp [List.getElem?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self n)]
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec (const (some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a n => by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n IH => simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
theorem listLookup [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (List.lookup : α → List (α × β) → Option β) :=
(to₂ <| list_rec snd (const none) <|
to₂ <|
cond (Primrec.beq.comp (fst.comp fst) (fst.comp <| fst.comp snd))
(option_some.comp <| snd.comp <| fst.comp snd)
(snd.comp <| snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a ps => by
induction' ps with p ps ih <;> simp [List.lookup, *]
cases ha : a == p.1 <;> simp [ha]
theorem nat_omega_rec' (f : β → σ) {m : β → ℕ} {l : β → List β} {g : β → List σ → Option σ}
(hm : Primrec m) (hl : Primrec l) (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(Ord : ∀ b, ∀ b' ∈ l b, m b' < m b)
(H : ∀ b, g b ((l b).map f) = some (f b)) : Primrec f := by
haveI : DecidableEq β := Encodable.decidableEqOfEncodable β
let mapGraph (M : List (β × σ)) (bs : List β) : List σ := bs.flatMap (Option.toList <| M.lookup ·)
let bindList (b : β) : ℕ → List β := fun n ↦ n.rec [b] fun _ bs ↦ bs.flatMap l
let graph (b : β) : ℕ → List (β × σ) := fun i ↦ i.rec [] fun i ih ↦
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' ↦ (g b' <| mapGraph ih (l b')).map (b', ·)
have mapGraph_primrec : Primrec₂ mapGraph :=
to₂ <| list_flatMap snd <| optionToList.comp₂ <| listLookup.comp₂ .right (fst.comp₂ .left)
have bindList_primrec : Primrec₂ (bindList) :=
nat_rec' snd
(list_cons.comp fst (const []))
(to₂ <| list_flatMap (snd.comp snd) (hl.comp₂ .right))
have graph_primrec : Primrec₂ (graph) :=
to₂ <| nat_rec' snd (const []) <|
to₂ <| listFilterMap
(bindList_primrec.comp
(fst.comp fst)
(nat_sub.comp (hm.comp <| fst.comp fst) (fst.comp snd))) <|
to₂ <| option_map
(hg.comp snd (mapGraph_primrec.comp (snd.comp <| snd.comp fst) (hl.comp snd)))
(Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (snd.comp₂ .left) .right)
have : Primrec (fun b => (graph b (m b + 1))[0]?.map Prod.snd) :=
option_map (list_getElem?.comp (graph_primrec.comp Primrec.id (succ.comp hm)) (const 0))
(snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)
exact option_some_iff.mp <| this.of_eq <| fun b ↦ by
have graph_eq_map_bindList (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ m b + 1) :
graph b i = (bindList b (m b + 1 - i)).map fun x ↦ (x, f x) := by
have bindList_eq_nil : bindList b (m b + 1) = [] :=
have bindList_m_lt (k : ℕ) : ∀ b' ∈ bindList b k, m b' < m b + 1 - k := by
induction' k with k ih <;> simp [bindList]
intro a₂ a₁ ha₁ ha₂
have : k ≤ m b :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by simpa using Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub <| Nat.zero_lt_of_lt (ih a₁ ha₁))
have : m a₁ ≤ m b - k :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by rw [← Nat.succ_sub this]; simpa using ih a₁ ha₁)
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Ord a₁ a₂ ha₂) this
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr
(by intro b' ha'; by_contra; simpa using bindList_m_lt (m b + 1) b' ha')
have mapGraph_graph {bs bs' : List β} (has : bs' ⊆ bs) :
mapGraph (bs.map <| fun x => (x, f x)) bs' = bs'.map f := by
induction' bs' with b bs' ih <;> simp [mapGraph]
· have : b ∈ bs ∧ bs' ⊆ bs := by simpa using has
rcases this with ⟨ha, has'⟩
simpa [List.lookup_graph f ha] using ih has'
have graph_succ : ∀ i, graph b (i + 1) =
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' =>
(g b' <| mapGraph (graph b i) (l b')).map (b', ·) := fun _ => rfl
have bindList_succ : ∀ i, bindList b (i + 1) = (bindList b i).flatMap l := fun _ => rfl
induction' i with i ih
· symm; simpa [graph] using bindList_eq_nil
· simp only [graph_succ, ih (Nat.le_of_lt hi), Nat.succ_sub (Nat.lt_succ.mp hi),
Nat.succ_eq_add_one, bindList_succ, Nat.reduceSubDiff]
apply List.filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some.mpr
intro b' ha'; simp; rw [mapGraph_graph]
· exact H b'
· exact (List.infix_flatMap_of_mem ha' l).subset
simp [graph_eq_map_bindList (m b + 1) (Nat.le_refl _), bindList]
theorem nat_omega_rec (f : α → β → σ) {m : α → β → ℕ}
{l : α → β → List β} {g : α → β × List σ → Option σ}
(hm : Primrec₂ m) (hl : Primrec₂ l) (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(Ord : ∀ a b, ∀ b' ∈ l a b, m a b' < m a b)
(H : ∀ a b, g a (b, (l a b).map (f a)) = some (f a b)) : Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec₂.uncurry.mp <|
nat_omega_rec' (Function.uncurry f)
(Primrec₂.uncurry.mpr hm)
(list_map (hl.comp fst snd) (Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ .left) .right))
(hg.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ .left) (Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (snd.comp₂ .left) .right))
(by simpa using Ord) (by simpa [Function.comp] using H)
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Primrec
/-- A subtype of a primitive recursive predicate is `Primcodable`. -/
def subtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) : Primcodable (Subtype p) :=
⟨have : Primrec fun n => (@decode α _ n).bind fun a => Option.guard p a :=
option_bind .decode (option_guard (hp.comp snd).to₂ snd)
nat_iff.1 <| (encode_iff.2 this).of_eq fun n =>
show _ = encode ((@decode α _ n).bind fun _ => _) by
rcases @decode α _ n with - | a; · rfl
dsimp [Option.guard]
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]; rfl⟩
instance fin {n} : Primcodable (Fin n) :=
@ofEquiv _ _ (subtype <| nat_lt.comp .id (const n)) Fin.equivSubtype
instance vector {n} : Primcodable (List.Vector α n) :=
subtype ((@Primrec.eq ℕ _ _).comp list_length (const _))
instance finArrow {n} : Primcodable (Fin n → α) :=
ofEquiv _ (Equiv.vectorEquivFin _ _).symm
section ULower
attribute [local instance] Encodable.decidableRangeEncode Encodable.decidableEqOfEncodable
theorem mem_range_encode : PrimrecPred (fun n => n ∈ Set.range (encode : α → ℕ)) :=
have : PrimrecPred fun n => Encodable.decode₂ α n ≠ none :=
.not
(Primrec.eq.comp
(.option_bind .decode
(.ite (Primrec.eq.comp (Primrec.encode.comp .snd) .fst)
(Primrec.option_some.comp .snd) (.const _)))
(.const _))
this.of_eq fun _ => decode₂_ne_none_iff
instance ulower : Primcodable (ULower α) :=
Primcodable.subtype mem_range_encode
end ULower
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
Primrec (@Subtype.val α p) := by
letI := Primcodable.subtype hp
refine (@Primcodable.prim (Subtype p)).of_eq fun n => ?_
rcases @decode (Subtype p) _ n with (_ | ⟨a, h⟩) <;> rfl
theorem subtype_val_iff {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} {f : α → Subtype p} :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
(Primrec fun a => (f a).1) ↔ Primrec f := by
letI := Primcodable.subtype hp
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hf => subtype_val.comp hf⟩
refine Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => ?_
rcases @decode α _ n with - | a; · rfl
simp; rfl
theorem subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} {f : α → β}
{h : ∀ a, p (f a)} (hf : Primrec f) :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
Primrec fun a => @Subtype.mk β p (f a) (h a) :=
subtype_val_iff.1 hf
theorem option_get {f : α → Option β} {h : ∀ a, (f a).isSome} :
Primrec f → Primrec fun a => (f a).get (h a) := by
intro hf
refine (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => ?_
generalize hx : @decode α _ n = x
cases x <;> simp
theorem ulower_down : Primrec (ULower.down : α → ULower α) :=
letI : ∀ a, Decidable (a ∈ Set.range (encode : α → ℕ)) := decidableRangeEncode _
subtype_mk .encode
theorem ulower_up : Primrec (ULower.up : ULower α → α) :=
letI : ∀ a, Decidable (a ∈ Set.range (encode : α → ℕ)) := decidableRangeEncode _
option_get (Primrec.decode₂.comp subtype_val)
theorem fin_val_iff {n} {f : α → Fin n} : (Primrec fun a => (f a).1) ↔ Primrec f := by
letI : Primcodable { a // id a < n } := Primcodable.subtype (nat_lt.comp .id (const _))
exact (Iff.trans (by rfl) subtype_val_iff).trans (of_equiv_iff _)
theorem fin_val {n} : Primrec (fun (i : Fin n) => (i : ℕ)) :=
fin_val_iff.2 .id
theorem fin_succ {n} : Primrec (@Fin.succ n) :=
fin_val_iff.1 <| by simp [succ.comp fin_val]
theorem vector_toList {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.toList α n) :=
subtype_val
theorem vector_toList_iff {n} {f : α → List.Vector β n} :
(Primrec fun a => (f a).toList) ↔ Primrec f :=
subtype_val_iff
theorem vector_cons {n} : Primrec₂ (@List.Vector.cons α n) :=
vector_toList_iff.1 <| by simpa using list_cons.comp fst (vector_toList_iff.2 snd)
theorem vector_length {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.length α n) :=
const _
theorem vector_head {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.head α n) :=
option_some_iff.1 <| (list_head?.comp vector_toList).of_eq fun ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem vector_tail {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.tail α n) :=
vector_toList_iff.1 <| (list_tail.comp vector_toList).of_eq fun ⟨l, h⟩ => by cases l <;> rfl
theorem vector_get {n} : Primrec₂ (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (vector_toList.comp fst) (fin_val.comp snd)).of_eq fun a => by
simp [Vector.get_eq_get_toList]
theorem list_ofFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ}, (∀ i, Primrec (f i)) → Primrec fun a => List.ofFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => by simp only [List.ofFn_zero]; exact const []
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simpa [List.ofFn_succ] using list_cons.comp (hf 0) (list_ofFn fun i => hf i.succ)
theorem vector_ofFn {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ} (hf : ∀ i, Primrec (f i)) :
Primrec fun a => List.Vector.ofFn fun i => f i a :=
vector_toList_iff.1 <| by simp [list_ofFn hf]
theorem vector_get' {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
of_equiv_symm
theorem vector_ofFn' {n} : Primrec (@List.Vector.ofFn α n) :=
of_equiv
theorem fin_app {n} : Primrec₂ (@id (Fin n → σ)) :=
(vector_get.comp (vector_ofFn'.comp fst) snd).of_eq fun ⟨v, i⟩ => by simp
theorem fin_curry₁ {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ ∀ i, Primrec (f i) :=
⟨fun h i => h.comp (const i) .id, fun h =>
(vector_get.comp ((vector_ofFn h).comp snd) fst).of_eq fun a => by simp⟩
theorem fin_curry {n} {f : α → Fin n → σ} : Primrec f ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => fin_app.comp (h.comp fst) snd, fun h =>
(vector_get'.comp
(vector_ofFn fun i => show Primrec fun a => f a i from h.comp .id (const i))).of_eq
fun a => by funext i; simp⟩
end Primrec
namespace Nat
open List.Vector
/-- An alternative inductive definition of `Primrec` which
does not use the pairing function on ℕ, and so has to
work with n-ary functions on ℕ instead of unary functions.
We prove that this is equivalent to the regular notion
in `to_prim` and `of_prim`. -/
inductive Primrec' : ∀ {n}, (List.Vector ℕ n → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : @Primrec' 0 fun _ => 0
| succ : @Primrec' 1 fun v => succ v.head
| get {n} (i : Fin n) : Primrec' fun v => v.get i
| comp {m n f} (g : Fin n → List.Vector ℕ m → ℕ) :
Primrec' f → (∀ i, Primrec' (g i)) → Primrec' fun a => f (List.Vector.ofFn fun i => g i a)
| prec {n f g} :
@Primrec' n f →
@Primrec' (n + 2) g →
Primrec' fun v : List.Vector ℕ (n + 1) =>
v.head.rec (f v.tail) fun y IH => g (y ::ᵥ IH ::ᵥ v.tail)
end Nat
namespace Nat.Primrec'
open List.Vector Primrec
theorem to_prim {n f} (pf : @Nat.Primrec' n f) : Primrec f := by
induction pf with
| zero => exact .const 0
| succ => exact _root_.Primrec.succ.comp .vector_head
| get i => exact Primrec.vector_get.comp .id (.const i)
| comp _ _ _ hf hg => exact hf.comp (.vector_ofFn fun i => hg i)
| @prec n f g _ _ hf hg =>
exact
.nat_rec' .vector_head (hf.comp Primrec.vector_tail)
(hg.comp <|
Primrec.vector_cons.comp (Primrec.fst.comp .snd) <|
Primrec.vector_cons.comp (Primrec.snd.comp .snd) <|
(@Primrec.vector_tail _ _ (n + 1)).comp .fst).to₂
theorem of_eq {n} {f g : List.Vector ℕ n → ℕ} (hf : Primrec' f) (H : ∀ i, f i = g i) :
Primrec' g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const {n} : ∀ m, @Primrec' n fun _ => m
| 0 => zero.comp Fin.elim0 fun i => i.elim0
| m + 1 => succ.comp _ fun _ => const m
theorem head {n : ℕ} : @Primrec' n.succ head :=
(get 0).of_eq fun v => by simp [get_zero]
theorem tail {n f} (hf : @Primrec' n f) : @Primrec' n.succ fun v => f v.tail :=
(hf.comp _ fun i => @get _ i.succ).of_eq fun v => by
rw [← ofFn_get v.tail]; congr; funext i; simp
/-- A function from vectors to vectors is primitive recursive when all of its projections are. -/
def Vec {n m} (f : List.Vector ℕ n → List.Vector ℕ m) : Prop :=
∀ i, Primrec' fun v => (f v).get i
protected theorem nil {n} : @Vec n 0 fun _ => nil := fun i => i.elim0
protected theorem cons {n m f g} (hf : @Primrec' n f) (hg : @Vec n m g) :
Vec fun v => f v ::ᵥ g v := fun i => Fin.cases (by simp [*]) (fun i => by simp [hg i]) i
theorem idv {n} : @Vec n n id :=
get
theorem comp' {n m f g} (hf : @Primrec' m f) (hg : @Vec n m g) : Primrec' fun v => f (g v) :=
(hf.comp _ hg).of_eq fun v => by simp
theorem comp₁ (f : ℕ → ℕ) (hf : @Primrec' 1 fun v => f v.head) {n g} (hg : @Primrec' n g) :
Primrec' fun v => f (g v) :=
hf.comp _ fun _ => hg
theorem comp₂ (f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) (hf : @Primrec' 2 fun v => f v.head v.tail.head) {n g h}
(hg : @Primrec' n g) (hh : @Primrec' n h) : Primrec' fun v => f (g v) (h v) := by
simpa using hf.comp' (hg.cons <| hh.cons Primrec'.nil)
theorem prec' {n f g h} (hf : @Primrec' n f) (hg : @Primrec' n g) (hh : @Primrec' (n + 2) h) :
@Primrec' n fun v => (f v).rec (g v) fun y IH : ℕ => h (y ::ᵥ IH ::ᵥ v) := by
simpa using comp' (prec hg hh) (hf.cons idv)
theorem pred : @Primrec' 1 fun v => v.head.pred :=
(prec' head (const 0) head).of_eq fun v => by simp; cases v.head <;> rfl
theorem add : @Primrec' 2 fun v => v.head + v.tail.head :=
(prec head (succ.comp₁ _ (tail head))).of_eq fun v => by
simp; induction v.head <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem sub : @Primrec' 2 fun v => v.head - v.tail.head := by
have : @Primrec' 2 fun v ↦ (fun a b ↦ b - a) v.head v.tail.head := by
refine (prec head (pred.comp₁ _ (tail head))).of_eq fun v => ?_
simp; induction v.head <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
simpa using comp₂ (fun a b => b - a) this (tail head) head
theorem mul : @Primrec' 2 fun v => v.head * v.tail.head :=
(prec (const 0) (tail (add.comp₂ _ (tail head) head))).of_eq fun v => by
simp; induction v.head <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_mul]; rw [add_comm]
theorem if_lt {n a b f g} (ha : @Primrec' n a) (hb : @Primrec' n b) (hf : @Primrec' n f)
(hg : @Primrec' n g) : @Primrec' n fun v => if a v < b v then f v else g v :=
(prec' (sub.comp₂ _ hb ha) hg (tail <| tail hf)).of_eq fun v => by
cases e : b v - a v
· simp [not_lt.2 (Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp e)]
· simp [Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e]
theorem natPair : @Primrec' 2 fun v => v.head.pair v.tail.head :=
if_lt head (tail head) (add.comp₂ _ (tail <| mul.comp₂ _ head head) head)
(add.comp₂ _ (add.comp₂ _ (mul.comp₂ _ head head) head) (tail head))
protected theorem encode : ∀ {n}, @Primrec' n encode
| 0 => (const 0).of_eq fun v => by rw [v.eq_nil]; rfl
| _ + 1 =>
(succ.comp₁ _ (natPair.comp₂ _ head (tail Primrec'.encode))).of_eq fun ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem sqrt : @Primrec' 1 fun v => v.head.sqrt := by
suffices H : ∀ n : ℕ, n.sqrt =
n.rec 0 fun x y => if x.succ < y.succ * y.succ then y else y.succ by
simp only [H, succ_eq_add_one]
have :=
@prec' 1 _ _
(fun v => by
have x := v.head; have y := v.tail.head
exact if x.succ < y.succ * y.succ then y else y.succ)
head (const 0) ?_
· exact this
have x1 : @Primrec' 3 fun v => v.head.succ := succ.comp₁ _ head
have y1 : @Primrec' 3 fun v => v.tail.head.succ := succ.comp₁ _ (tail head)
exact if_lt x1 (mul.comp₂ _ y1 y1) (tail head) y1
introv; symm
induction' n with n IH; · simp
dsimp; rw [IH]; split_ifs with h
· exact le_antisymm (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt (Nat.le_succ _)) (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 <| Nat.sqrt_lt.2 h)
· exact
Nat.eq_sqrt.2 ⟨not_lt.1 h, Nat.sqrt_lt.1 <| Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| Nat.sqrt_succ_le_succ_sqrt _⟩
theorem unpair₁ {n f} (hf : @Primrec' n f) : @Primrec' n fun v => (f v).unpair.1 := by
have s := sqrt.comp₁ _ hf
| have fss := sub.comp₂ _ hf (mul.comp₂ _ s s)
refine (if_lt fss s fss s).of_eq fun v => ?_
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 1,379 | 1,380 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,721 | 1,740 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Variance
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
/-!
# Identically distributed random variables
Two random variables defined on two (possibly different) probability spaces but taking value in
the same space are *identically distributed* if their distributions (i.e., the image probability
measures on the target space) coincide. We define this concept and establish its basic properties
in this file.
## Main definitions and results
* `IdentDistrib f g μ ν` registers that the image of `μ` under `f` coincides with the image of `ν`
under `g` (and that `f` and `g` are almost everywhere measurable, as otherwise the image measures
don't make sense). The measures can be kept implicit as in `IdentDistrib f g` if the spaces
are registered as measure spaces.
* `IdentDistrib.comp`: being identically distributed is stable under composition with measurable
maps.
There are two main kinds of lemmas, under the assumption that `f` and `g` are identically
distributed: lemmas saying that two quantities computed for `f` and `g` are the same, and lemmas
saying that if `f` has some property then `g` also has it. The first kind is registered as
`IdentDistrib.foo_fst`, the second one as `IdentDistrib.foo_snd` (in the latter case, to deduce
a property of `f` from one of `g`, use `h.symm.foo_snd` where `h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν`). For
instance:
* `IdentDistrib.measure_mem_eq`: if `f` and `g` are identically distributed, then the probabilities
that they belong to a given measurable set are the same.
* `IdentDistrib.integral_eq`: if `f` and `g` are identically distributed, then their integrals
are the same.
* `IdentDistrib.variance_eq`: if `f` and `g` are identically distributed, then their variances
are the same.
* `IdentDistrib.aestronglyMeasurable_snd`: if `f` and `g` are identically distributed and `f`
is almost everywhere strongly measurable, then so is `g`.
* `IdentDistrib.memLp_snd`: if `f` and `g` are identically distributed and `f`
belongs to `ℒp`, then so does `g`.
We also register several dot notation shortcuts for convenience.
For instance, if `h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν`, then `h.sq` states that `f^2` and `g^2` are
identically distributed, and `h.norm` states that `‖f‖` and `‖g‖` are identically distributed, and
so on.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ]
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-- Two functions defined on two (possibly different) measure spaces are identically distributed if
their image measures coincide. This only makes sense when the functions are ae measurable
(as otherwise the image measures are not defined), so we require this as well in the definition. -/
structure IdentDistrib (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac)
(ν : Measure β := by volume_tac) : Prop where
aemeasurable_fst : AEMeasurable f μ
aemeasurable_snd : AEMeasurable g ν
map_eq : Measure.map f μ = Measure.map g ν
namespace IdentDistrib
open TopologicalSpace
variable {μ : Measure α} {ν : Measure β} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
protected theorem refl (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : IdentDistrib f f μ μ :=
{ aemeasurable_fst := hf
aemeasurable_snd := hf
map_eq := rfl }
protected theorem symm (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) : IdentDistrib g f ν μ :=
{ aemeasurable_fst := h.aemeasurable_snd
aemeasurable_snd := h.aemeasurable_fst
map_eq := h.map_eq.symm }
protected theorem trans {ρ : Measure δ} {h : δ → γ} (h₁ : IdentDistrib f g μ ν)
(h₂ : IdentDistrib g h ν ρ) : IdentDistrib f h μ ρ :=
{ aemeasurable_fst := h₁.aemeasurable_fst
aemeasurable_snd := h₂.aemeasurable_snd
map_eq := h₁.map_eq.trans h₂.map_eq }
protected theorem comp_of_aemeasurable {u : γ → δ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν)
(hu : AEMeasurable u (Measure.map f μ)) : IdentDistrib (u ∘ f) (u ∘ g) μ ν :=
{ aemeasurable_fst := hu.comp_aemeasurable h.aemeasurable_fst
aemeasurable_snd := by rw [h.map_eq] at hu; exact hu.comp_aemeasurable h.aemeasurable_snd
map_eq := by
rw [← AEMeasurable.map_map_of_aemeasurable hu h.aemeasurable_fst, ←
AEMeasurable.map_map_of_aemeasurable _ h.aemeasurable_snd, h.map_eq]
rwa [← h.map_eq] }
protected theorem comp {u : γ → δ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (hu : Measurable u) :
IdentDistrib (u ∘ f) (u ∘ g) μ ν :=
h.comp_of_aemeasurable hu.aemeasurable
protected theorem of_ae_eq {g : α → γ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (heq : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
IdentDistrib f g μ μ :=
{ aemeasurable_fst := hf
aemeasurable_snd := hf.congr heq
map_eq := Measure.map_congr heq }
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEMeasurable.identDistrib_mk
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : IdentDistrib f (hf.mk f) μ μ :=
IdentDistrib.of_ae_eq hf hf.ae_eq_mk
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.identDistrib_mk
[TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] [BorelSpace γ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : IdentDistrib f (hf.mk f) μ μ :=
IdentDistrib.of_ae_eq hf.aemeasurable hf.ae_eq_mk
theorem measure_mem_eq (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ν (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable h.aemeasurable_fst hs, ←
Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable h.aemeasurable_snd hs, h.map_eq]
alias measure_preimage_eq := measure_mem_eq
theorem ae_snd (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {p : γ → Prop} (pmeas : MeasurableSet {x | p x})
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x)) : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p (g x) := by
apply (ae_map_iff h.aemeasurable_snd pmeas).1
rw [← h.map_eq]
exact (ae_map_iff h.aemeasurable_fst pmeas).2 hp
theorem ae_mem_snd (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {t : Set γ} (tmeas : MeasurableSet t)
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t) : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, g x ∈ t :=
h.ae_snd tmeas ht
/-- In a second countable topology, the first function in an identically distributed pair is a.e.
strongly measurable. So is the second function, but use `h.symm.aestronglyMeasurable_fst` as
`h.aestronglyMeasurable_snd` has a different meaning. -/
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_fst [TopologicalSpace γ] [MetrizableSpace γ] [OpensMeasurableSpace γ]
[SecondCountableTopology γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
h.aemeasurable_fst.aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `f` and `g` are identically distributed and `f` is a.e. strongly measurable, so is `g`. -/
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_snd [TopologicalSpace γ] [MetrizableSpace γ] [BorelSpace γ]
(h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν := by
refine aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.2 ⟨h.aemeasurable_snd, ?_⟩
rcases (aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.1 hf).2 with ⟨t, t_sep, ht⟩
refine ⟨closure t, t_sep.closure, ?_⟩
apply h.ae_mem_snd isClosed_closure.measurableSet
filter_upwards [ht] with x hx using subset_closure hx
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_iff [TopologicalSpace γ] [MetrizableSpace γ] [BorelSpace γ]
(h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable g ν :=
⟨fun hf => h.aestronglyMeasurable_snd hf, fun hg => h.symm.aestronglyMeasurable_snd hg⟩
theorem essSup_eq [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OpensMeasurableSpace γ]
[OrderClosedTopology γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) : essSup f μ = essSup g ν := by
have I : ∀ a, μ {x : α | a < f x} = ν {x : β | a < g x} := fun a =>
h.measure_mem_eq measurableSet_Ioi
simp_rw [essSup_eq_sInf, I]
theorem lintegral_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, g x ∂ν := by
change ∫⁻ x, id (f x) ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, id (g x) ∂ν
rw [← lintegral_map' aemeasurable_id h.aemeasurable_fst, ←
lintegral_map' aemeasurable_id h.aemeasurable_snd, h.map_eq]
theorem integral_eq [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [NormedSpace ℝ γ] [BorelSpace γ]
(h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂ν := by
by_cases hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ
· have A : AEStronglyMeasurable id (Measure.map f μ) := by
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
rcases (aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.1 hf).2 with ⟨t, t_sep, ht⟩
refine ⟨aemeasurable_id, ⟨closure t, t_sep.closure, ?_⟩⟩
rw [ae_map_iff h.aemeasurable_fst]
· filter_upwards [ht] with x hx using subset_closure hx
· exact isClosed_closure.measurableSet
change ∫ x, id (f x) ∂μ = ∫ x, id (g x) ∂ν
rw [← integral_map h.aemeasurable_fst A]
rw [h.map_eq] at A
rw [← integral_map h.aemeasurable_snd A, h.map_eq]
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hf]
rw [h.aestronglyMeasurable_iff] at hf
rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hf]
theorem eLpNorm_eq [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [OpensMeasurableSpace γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν)
(p : ℝ≥0∞) : eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p ν := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm, eLpNormEssSup, ENNReal.top_ne_zero, eq_self_iff_true, if_true,
if_false]
apply essSup_eq
exact h.comp (measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal.comp measurable_nnnorm)
simp only [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', one_div]
congr 1
apply lintegral_eq
exact h.comp (Measurable.pow_const (measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal.comp measurable_nnnorm)
p.toReal)
theorem memLp_snd [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] {p : ℝ≥0∞} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν)
(hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp g p ν := by
refine ⟨h.aestronglyMeasurable_snd hf.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [← h.eLpNorm_eq]
exact hf.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_snd := memLp_snd
theorem memLp_iff [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] {p : ℝ≥0∞} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
MemLp f p μ ↔ MemLp g p ν :=
⟨fun hf => h.memLp_snd hf, fun hg => h.symm.memLp_snd hg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_iff := memLp_iff
theorem integrable_snd [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν)
(hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable g ν := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact h.memLp_snd hf
theorem integrable_iff [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g ν :=
⟨fun hf => h.integrable_snd hf, fun hg => h.symm.integrable_snd hg⟩
protected theorem norm [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) μ ν :=
h.comp measurable_norm
protected theorem nnnorm [NormedAddCommGroup γ] [BorelSpace γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) (fun x => ‖g x‖₊) μ ν :=
h.comp measurable_nnnorm
protected theorem pow [Pow γ ℕ] [MeasurablePow γ ℕ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {n : ℕ} :
IdentDistrib (fun x => f x ^ n) (fun x => g x ^ n) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_id.pow_const n)
protected theorem sq [Pow γ ℕ] [MeasurablePow γ ℕ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => f x ^ 2) (fun x => g x ^ 2) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_id.pow_const 2)
protected theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0} {g : β → ℝ≥0} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) (fun x => (g x : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ν :=
h.comp measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_const [Mul γ] [MeasurableMul γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (c : γ) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => f x * c) (fun x => g x * c) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_mul_const c)
@[to_additive]
theorem const_mul [Mul γ] [MeasurableMul γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (c : γ) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => c * f x) (fun x => c * g x) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_const_mul c)
@[to_additive]
theorem div_const [Div γ] [MeasurableDiv γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (c : γ) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => f x / c) (fun x => g x / c) μ ν :=
h.comp (MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const c)
@[to_additive]
theorem const_div [Div γ] [MeasurableDiv γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) (c : γ) :
IdentDistrib (fun x => c / f x) (fun x => c / g x) μ ν :=
h.comp (MeasurableDiv.measurable_const_div c)
@[to_additive]
lemma inv [Inv γ] [MeasurableInv γ] (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
IdentDistrib f⁻¹ g⁻¹ μ ν := h.comp measurable_inv
theorem evariance_eq {f : α → ℝ} {g : β → ℝ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
evariance f μ = evariance g ν := by
convert (h.sub_const (∫ x, f x ∂μ)).nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal.sq.lintegral_eq
rw [h.integral_eq]
rfl
theorem variance_eq {f : α → ℝ} {g : β → ℝ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) :
variance f μ = variance g ν := by rw [variance, h.evariance_eq]; rfl
end IdentDistrib
section UniformIntegrable
open TopologicalSpace
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [BorelSpace E]
{μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MemLp.uniformIntegrable_of_identDistrib` which only requires
`AEStronglyMeasurable`. -/
theorem MemLp.uniformIntegrable_of_identDistrib_aux {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → E} {j : ι} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hℒp : MemLp (f j) p μ) (hfmeas : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i))
(hf : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (f i) (f j) μ μ) : UniformIntegrable f p μ := by
refine uniformIntegrable_of' hp hp' hfmeas fun ε hε => ?_
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
swap; · exact ⟨0, fun i => False.elim (hι <| Nonempty.intro i)⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC₁, hC₂⟩ := hℒp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le (hfmeas _) hε
refine ⟨⟨C, hC₁.le⟩, fun i => le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) hC₂⟩
have : {x | (⟨C, hC₁.le⟩ : ℝ≥0) ≤ ‖f i x‖₊} = {x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖} := by
ext x
| simp_rw [← norm_toNNReal]
exact Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, ← eLpNorm_norm, ← eLpNorm_norm (Set.indicator _ _)]
simp_rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, coe_nnnorm]
let F : E → ℝ := (fun x : E => if (⟨C, hC₁.le⟩ : ℝ≥0) ≤ ‖x‖₊ then ‖x‖ else 0)
| Mathlib/Probability/IdentDistrib.lean | 304 | 308 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Alena Gusakov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Grade
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Shadows
This file defines shadows of a set family. The shadow of a set family is the set family of sets we
get by removing any element from any set of the original family. If one pictures `Finset α` as a big
hypercube (each dimension being membership of a given element), then taking the shadow corresponds
to projecting each finset down once in all available directions.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.shadow`: The shadow of a set family. Everything we can get by removing a new element from
some set.
* `Finset.upShadow`: The upper shadow of a set family. Everything we can get by adding an element
to some set.
## Notation
We define notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `∂ 𝒜`: Shadow of `𝒜`.
* `∂⁺ 𝒜`: Upper shadow of `𝒜`.
We also maintain the convention that `a, b : α` are elements of the ground type, `s, t : Finset α`
are finsets, and `𝒜, ℬ : Finset (Finset α)` are finset families.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
* http://discretemath.imp.fu-berlin.de/DMII-2015-16/kruskal.pdf
## Tags
shadow, set family
-/
open Finset Nat
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Shadow
variable [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α} {a : α} {k r : ℕ}
/-- The shadow of a set family `𝒜` is all sets we can get by removing one element from any set in
`𝒜`, and the (`k` times) iterated shadow (`shadow^[k]`) is all sets we can get by removing `k`
elements from any set in `𝒜`. -/
def shadow (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
𝒜.sup fun s => s.image (erase s)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FinsetFamily] notation:max "∂ " => Finset.shadow
open FinsetFamily
/-- The shadow of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem shadow_empty : ∂ (∅ : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma shadow_iterate_empty (k : ℕ) : ∂^[k] (∅ : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ := by
induction k <;> simp [*, shadow_empty]
@[simp]
theorem shadow_singleton_empty : ∂ ({∅} : Finset (Finset α)) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem shadow_singleton (a : α) : ∂ {{a}} = {∅} := by
simp [shadow]
/-- The shadow is monotone. -/
@[mono]
theorem shadow_monotone : Monotone (shadow : Finset (Finset α) → Finset (Finset α)) := fun _ _ =>
sup_mono
@[gcongr] lemma shadow_mono (h𝒜ℬ : 𝒜 ⊆ ℬ) : ∂ 𝒜 ⊆ ∂ ℬ := shadow_monotone h𝒜ℬ
/-- `t` is in the shadow of `𝒜` iff there is a `s ∈ 𝒜` from which we can remove one element to
get `t`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, ∃ a ∈ s, erase s a = t := by
simp only [shadow, mem_sup, mem_image]
theorem erase_mem_shadow (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) (ha : a ∈ s) : erase s a ∈ ∂ 𝒜 :=
mem_shadow_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩
/-- `t ∈ ∂𝒜` iff `t` is exactly one element less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ #(s \ t) = 1 := by
simp_rw [mem_shadow_iff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_erase]
/-- `t` is in the shadow of `𝒜` iff we can add an element to it so that the resulting finset is in
`𝒜`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ a ∉ t, insert a t ∈ 𝒜 := by
simp_rw [mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff, ← covBy_iff_card_sdiff_eq_one, covBy_iff_exists_insert]
aesop
/-- `s ∈ ∂ 𝒜` iff `s` is exactly one element less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add_one : t ∈ ∂ 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ #s = #t + 1 := by
refine mem_shadow_iff_exists_sdiff.trans <| exists_congr fun t ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦
and_congr_right fun hst ↦ ?_
rw [card_sdiff hst, tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le, add_comm]
exact card_mono hst
lemma mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_card :
t ∈ ∂^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ u : Finset α, #u = k ∧ Disjoint t u ∧ t ∪ u ∈ 𝒜 := by
induction k generalizing t with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [mem_shadow_iff_insert_mem, ih, Function.iterate_succ_apply', card_eq_succ]
aesop
|
/-- `t ∈ ∂^k 𝒜` iff `t` is exactly `k` elements less than something from `𝒜`.
See also `Finset.mem_shadow_iff_exists_mem_card_add`. -/
lemma mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_sdiff : t ∈ ∂^[k] 𝒜 ↔ ∃ s ∈ 𝒜, t ⊆ s ∧ #(s \ t) = k := by
rw [mem_shadow_iterate_iff_exists_card]
constructor
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Shadow.lean | 124 | 130 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`K.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = K.orthogonalProjection u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `K.reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `K.reflection u` to satisfy
`u + (K.reflection u) = 2 • K.orthogonalProjection u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open InnerProductSpace
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Finsupp
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- **Existence of minimizers**, aka the **Hilbert projection theorem**.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`. -/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
exact le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
namespace Submodule
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superseded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply RCLike.ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).2 this
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if every vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
K.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases K.exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← K.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero hwK]
instance [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map f.toLinearIsometry).HasOrthogonalProjection :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E).HasOrthogonalProjection := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u), K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ +
‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ := by
set p := K.orthogonalProjectionFn v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [K.orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq x]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
K.orthogonalProjectionFn v = (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) :=
rfl
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - K.orthogonalProjection v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u : E) = u - K.orthogonalProjection u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (K.orthogonalProjection u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u =
⟨u - K.orthogonalProjection u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (y : E) :
‖y - U.orthogonalProjection y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [U.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K'.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = (K'.orthogonalProjection u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : K.orthogonalProjection v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker K.orthogonalProjection = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection]
(x : E) : f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f.toLinearMap).orthogonalProjection (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f).HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f).orthogonalProjection (f x) :=
have : (p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
((p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).orthogonalProjection x : E') =
f (p.orthogonalProjection (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonalProjection = 0 := by ext
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖K.orthogonalProjection‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • ((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -map_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp K.orthogonalProjection.toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ K.reflectionLinearEquiv with
norm_map' := by
intro x
let w : K := K.orthogonalProjection x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : K.reflection p = 2 • (K.orthogonalProjection p : E) - p :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : K.reflection.symm = K.reflection :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : K.reflection⁻¹ = K.reflection :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : K.reflection (K.reflection p) = p :=
K.reflection.left_inv p
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive K.reflection :=
K.reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
K.reflection.trans K.reflection = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : K.reflection * K.reflection = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -K.reflection v := by
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
theorem reflection_orthogonal : Kᗮ.reflection = .trans K.reflection (.neg _) := by
ext; apply reflection_orthogonal_apply
variable {K}
theorem reflection_singleton_apply (u v : E) :
reflection (𝕜 ∙ u) v = 2 • (⟪u, v⟫ / ((‖u‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2)) • u - v := by
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_singleton, ofReal_pow]
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the subspace. -/
theorem reflection_eq_self_iff (x : E) : K.reflection x = x ↔ x ∈ K := by
rw [← orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← two_smul 𝕜,
two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul 𝕜]
refine (smul_right_injective E ?_).eq_iff
exact two_ne_zero
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self {x : E} (hx : x ∈ K) : K.reflection x = x :=
(reflection_eq_self_iff x).mpr hx
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x = f (K.reflection (f.symm x)) := by
simp [two_smul, reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_map_apply f K x]
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) = f.symm.trans (K.reflection.trans f) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_map_apply f K
/-- Reflection through the trivial subspace {0} is just negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_bot : reflection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg 𝕜 := by
ext; simp [reflection_apply]
end reflection
end Submodule
section Orthogonal
namespace Submodule
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
[K₁.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K₁ ⊔ K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ = K₂ := by
ext x
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
let v : K₁ := orthogonalProjection K₁ x
have hvm : x - v ∈ K₁ᗮ := sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2
· exact fun hx => ⟨v, v.prop, x - v, ⟨hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h v.prop)⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable {K} in
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := by
convert Submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) using 2
simp
/-- If `K` is complete, any `v` in `E` can be expressed as a sum of elements of `K` and `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (v : E) :
∃ y ∈ K, ∃ z ∈ Kᗮ, v = y + z :=
⟨K.orthogonalProjection v, Subtype.coe_prop _, v - K.orthogonalProjection v,
sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _, by simp⟩
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, then the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal
complement is itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮᗮ = K := by
ext v
constructor
· obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := K.exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal v
intro hv
have hz' : z = 0 := by
have hyz : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by simp [hz y hy, inner_eq_zero_symm]
simpa [inner_add_right, hyz] using hv z hz
simp [hy, hz']
· intro hv w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact hw v hv
/-- In a Hilbert space, the orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement of a subspace `K`
is the topological closure of `K`.
|
Note that the completeness assumption is necessary. Let `E` be the space `ℕ →₀ ℝ` with inner space
structure inherited from `PiLp 2 (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℝ)`. Let `K` be the subspace of sequences with the sum
of all elements equal to zero. Then `Kᗮ = ⊥`, `Kᗮᗮ = ⊤`. -/
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure [CompleteSpace E] :
Kᗮᗮ = K.topologicalClosure := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· convert Submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone K.le_topologicalClosure using 1
rw [K.topologicalClosure.orthogonal_orthogonal]
· exact K.topologicalClosure_minimal K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal Kᗮ.isClosed_orthogonal
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 781 | 790 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 382 | 382 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
lemma disjoint_edgeFinset : Disjoint G₁.edgeFinset G₂.edgeFinset ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.disjoint_coe, coe_edgeFinset, disjoint_edgeSet]
lemma edgeFinset_eq_empty : G.edgeFinset = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by
rw [← edgeFinset_bot, edgeFinset_inj]
lemma edgeFinset_nonempty : G.edgeFinset.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeFinset_eq_empty.ne]
theorem edgeFinset_card : #G.edgeFinset = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : #(univ : Finset G.edgeSet) = #G.edgeFinset :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ({e | ¬e.IsDiag} : Finset _) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
#(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : #G.edgeFinset ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ := #(G.neighborFinset v)
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : #(G.neighborFinset v) = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
theorem degree_pos_iff_mem_support : 0 < G.degree v ↔ v ∈ G.support := by
rw [G.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj v, mem_support]
theorem degree_eq_zero_iff_not_mem_support : G.degree v = 0 ↔ v ∉ G.support := by
rw [← G.degree_pos_iff_mem_support v, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, not_ne_iff]
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] : #(G.incidenceFinset v) = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = {e ∈ G.edgeFinset | v ∈ e} := by
ext e
induction e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
variable {G v}
/-- If `G ≤ H` then `G.degree v ≤ H.degree v` for any vertex `v`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_le {H : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype (H.neighborSet v)] (hle : G ≤ H) :
G.degree v ≤ H.degree v := by
simp_rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card fun v hv => hle hv
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ (· ∈ G.neighborSet v)
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = ({w | G.Adj v w} : Finset _) := by ext; simp
theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem complete_graph_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, top_adj, filter_ne]
rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ v), card_univ]
theorem bot_degree (v : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = 0 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, bot_adj, filter_False]
exact Finset.card_empty
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1) := by
intro v
simp
/-- The minimum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_minimal_degree_vertex`, `minDegree_le_degree`
and `le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree`. -/
def minDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
WithTop.untopD 0 (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).min
/-- There exists a vertex of minimal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_minimal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.minDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := min_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
obtain ⟨v, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp (mem_of_min ht)
exact ⟨v, by simp [minDegree, ht]⟩
/-- The minimum degree in the graph is at most the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem minDegree_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.minDegree ≤ G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Finset.min_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.min_le_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [minDegree, ht]
/-- In a nonempty graph, if `k` is at most the degree of every vertex, it is at most the minimum
degree. Note the assumption that the graph is nonempty is necessary as long as `G.minDegree` is
defined to be a natural. -/
theorem le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] (k : ℕ)
(h : ∀ v, k ≤ G.degree v) : k ≤ G.minDegree := by
rcases G.exists_minimal_degree_vertex with ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [hv]
apply h
/-- If there are no vertices then the `minDegree` is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma minDegree_of_isEmpty [DecidableRel G.Adj] [IsEmpty V] : G.minDegree = 0 := by
rw [minDegree, WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff]
simp
variable {G} in
/-- If `G` is a subgraph of `H` then `G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree`. -/
lemma minDegree_le_minDegree {H : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
(hle : G ≤ H) : G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree := by
by_cases hne : Nonempty V
· apply le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree
exact fun v ↦ (G.minDegree_le_degree v).trans (G.degree_le_of_le hle)
· rw [not_nonempty_iff] at hne
simp
/-- The maximum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_maximal_degree_vertex`, `degree_le_maxDegree`
and `maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le`. -/
def maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
Option.getD (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).max 0
/-- There exists a vertex of maximal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_maximal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.maxDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := max_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
have ht₂ := mem_of_max ht
simp only [mem_image, mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true] at ht₂
rcases ht₂ with ⟨v, _, rfl⟩
refine ⟨v, ?_⟩
rw [maxDegree, ht]
rfl
/-- The maximum degree in the graph is at least the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem degree_le_maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v ≤ G.maxDegree := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := Finset.max_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.le_max_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [maxDegree, ht]
/-- In a graph, if `k` is at least the degree of every vertex, then it is at least the maximum
degree. -/
theorem maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le [DecidableRel G.Adj] (k : ℕ) (h : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ k) :
G.maxDegree ≤ k := by
by_cases hV : (univ : Finset V).Nonempty
· haveI : Nonempty V := univ_nonempty_iff.mp hV
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := G.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
rw [hv]
apply h
· rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hV
rw [maxDegree, hV, image_empty]
exact k.zero_le
theorem degree_lt_card_verts [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v < Fintype.card V := by
classical
apply Finset.card_lt_card
rw [Finset.ssubset_iff]
exact ⟨v, by simp, Finset.subset_univ _⟩
/--
The maximum degree of a nonempty graph is less than the number of vertices. Note that the assumption
that `V` is nonempty is necessary, as otherwise this would assert the existence of a
natural number less than zero. -/
theorem maxDegree_lt_card_verts [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
G.maxDegree < Fintype.card V := by
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := G.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
rw [hv]
| apply G.degree_lt_card_verts v
theorem card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v w : V) :
Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 383 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Integration
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
/-!
# Variance of random variables
We define the variance of a real-valued random variable as `Var[X] = 𝔼[(X - 𝔼[X])^2]` (in the
`ProbabilityTheory` locale).
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.evariance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as an extended
non-negative real.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as a real number.
## Main results
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_expectation_sq`: the inequality `Var[X] ≤ 𝔼[X^2]`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality, i.e.,
`ℙ {ω | c ≤ |X ω - 𝔼[X]|} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Var[X] / c ^ 2)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality formulated with
`evariance` without requiring the random variables to be L².
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_add`: the variance of the sum of two independent
random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_sum`: the variance of a finite sum of pairwise
independent random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sub_mul_sub`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most `(b - 𝔼 X) * (𝔼 X - a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sq_of_bounded`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most`((b - a) / 2) ^ 2`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {μ : Measure Ω}
variable (X μ) in
-- Porting note: Consider if `evariance` or `eVariance` is better. Also,
-- consider `eVariationOn` in `Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation`.
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined as the Lebesgue integral of
`‖X - 𝔼[X]‖^2`. -/
def evariance : ℝ≥0∞ := ∫⁻ ω, ‖X ω - μ[X]‖ₑ ^ 2 ∂μ
variable (X μ) in
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined by applying `ENNReal.toReal`
to `evariance`. -/
def variance : ℝ := (evariance X μ).toReal
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.evariance X μ
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume
measure.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "]" => eVar[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.variance X μ
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume measure.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "]" => Var[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
theorem evariance_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ < ∞ := by
have := ENNReal.pow_lt_top (hX.sub <| memLp_const <| μ[X]).2 (n := 2)
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.toReal_one, one_div] at this
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_one] at this
simp_rw [ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
exact this
lemma evariance_ne_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ ≠ ∞ :=
(evariance_lt_top hX).ne
theorem evariance_eq_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hXm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) (hX : ¬MemLp X 2 μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ := by
by_contra h
rw [← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h
have : MemLp (fun ω => X ω - μ[X]) 2 μ := by
refine ⟨hXm.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.rpow_two, Ne]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by linarith) h.ne
refine hX ?_
convert this.add (memLp_const μ[X])
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, sub_add_cancel]
theorem evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ < ∞ ↔ MemLp X 2 μ where
mp := by contrapose!; rw [top_le_iff]; exact evariance_eq_top hX
mpr := evariance_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias evariance_lt_top_iff_memℒp := evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp
lemma evariance_eq_top_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ ↔ ¬ MemLp X 2 μ := by simp [← evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp hX]
theorem ofReal_variance [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) :
.ofReal (variance X μ) = evariance X μ := by
rw [variance, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact evariance_ne_top hX
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.evariance_lt_top := evariance_lt_top
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.evariance_ne_top := evariance_ne_top
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.ofReal_variance_eq := ofReal_variance
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_lt_top := evariance_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_ne_top := evariance_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal_variance_eq := ofReal_variance
variable (X μ) in
theorem evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal :
evariance X μ = ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal ((X ω - μ[X]) ^ 2) ∂μ := by
simp [evariance, ← enorm_pow, Real.enorm_of_nonneg (sq_nonneg _)]
lemma variance_eq_integral (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) : Var[X; μ] = ∫ ω, (X ω - μ[X]) ^ 2 ∂μ := by
simp [variance, evariance, toReal_enorm, ← integral_toReal ((hX.sub_const _).enorm.pow_const _) <|
.of_forall fun _ ↦ ENNReal.pow_lt_top enorm_lt_top]
lemma variance_of_integral_eq_zero (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) (hXint : μ[X] = 0) :
variance X μ = ∫ ω, X ω ^ 2 ∂μ := by
simp [variance_eq_integral hX, hXint]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq := variance_eq_integral
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq_of_integral_eq_zero := variance_of_integral_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem evariance_zero : evariance 0 μ = 0 := by simp [evariance]
theorem evariance_eq_zero_iff (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = 0 ↔ X =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => μ[X] := by
simp [evariance, lintegral_eq_zero_iff' ((hX.sub_const _).enorm.pow_const _), EventuallyEq,
sub_eq_zero]
theorem evariance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
evariance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (c ^ 2) * evariance X μ := by
rw [evariance, evariance, ← lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top.ne]
congr with ω
rw [integral_const_mul, ← mul_sub, enorm_mul, mul_pow, ← enorm_pow,
Real.enorm_of_nonneg (sq_nonneg _)]
@[simp]
theorem variance_zero (μ : Measure Ω) : variance 0 μ = 0 := by
simp only [variance, evariance_zero, ENNReal.toReal_zero]
theorem variance_nonneg (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) : 0 ≤ variance X μ :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem variance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
variance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = c ^ 2 * variance X μ := by
rw [variance, evariance_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sq_nonneg _)]
rfl
theorem variance_smul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
variance (c • X) μ = c ^ 2 * variance X μ :=
variance_mul c X μ
theorem variance_smul' {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra A ℝ] (c : A) (X : Ω → ℝ)
(μ : Measure Ω) : variance (c • X) μ = c ^ 2 • variance X μ := by
convert variance_smul (algebraMap A ℝ c) X μ using 1
· congr; simp only [algebraMap_smul]
· simp only [Algebra.smul_def, map_pow]
theorem variance_def' [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) :
variance X μ = μ[X ^ 2] - μ[X] ^ 2 := by
simp only [variance_eq_integral hX.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable, sub_sq']
rw [integral_sub, integral_add]; rotate_left
· exact hX.integrable_sq
· apply integrable_const
· apply hX.integrable_sq.add
apply integrable_const
· exact ((hX.integrable one_le_two).const_mul 2).mul_const' _
simp only [integral_const, measureReal_univ_eq_one, smul_eq_mul, one_mul, integral_mul_const,
integral_const_mul, Pi.pow_apply]
ring
theorem variance_le_expectation_sq [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ}
(hm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) : variance X μ ≤ μ[X ^ 2] := by
by_cases hX : MemLp X 2 μ
· rw [variance_def' hX]
simp only [sq_nonneg, sub_le_self_iff]
rw [variance, evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal, ← integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
· by_cases hint : Integrable X μ; swap
· simp only [integral_undef hint, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_zero]
exact le_rfl
· rw [integral_undef]
· exact integral_nonneg fun a => sq_nonneg _
intro h
have A : MemLp (X - fun ω : Ω => μ[X]) 2 μ :=
(memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq (hint.aestronglyMeasurable.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const)).2 h
have B : MemLp (fun _ : Ω => μ[X]) 2 μ := memLp_const _
apply hX
convert A.add B
simp
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => sq_nonneg _
· exact (AEMeasurable.pow_const (hm.aemeasurable.sub_const _) _).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem evariance_def' [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = (∫⁻ ω, ‖X ω‖ₑ ^ 2 ∂μ) - ENNReal.ofReal (μ[X] ^ 2) := by
by_cases hℒ : MemLp X 2 μ
· rw [← ofReal_variance hℒ, variance_def' hℒ, ENNReal.ofReal_sub _ (sq_nonneg _)]
congr
simp_rw [← enorm_pow, enorm]
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral]
· simp
· simpa using hℒ.abs.integrable_sq
· symm
rw [evariance_eq_top hX hℒ, ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff]
refine ⟨?_, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top⟩
rw [MemLp, not_and] at hℒ
specialize hℒ hX
simp only [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, not_lt, top_le_iff,
ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, one_div, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, inv_lt_zero, inv_pos, and_true,
or_iff_not_imp_left, not_and_or, zero_lt_two] at hℒ
exact mod_cast hℒ fun _ => zero_le_two
/-- **Chebyshev's inequality** for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) {c : ℝ≥0}
(hc : c ≠ 0) : μ {ω | ↑c ≤ |X ω - μ[X]|} ≤ evariance X μ / c ^ 2 := by
have A : (c : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have B : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun _ : Ω => μ[X]) μ := aestronglyMeasurable_const
convert meas_ge_le_mul_pow_eLpNorm μ two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top (hX.sub B) A using 1
· congr
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← coe_nnnorm,
NNReal.coe_le_coe, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
· rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
simp only [show ENNReal.ofNNReal (c ^ 2) = (ENNReal.ofNNReal c) ^ 2 by norm_cast,
ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, one_div, Pi.sub_apply]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow, mul_comm, ENNReal.rpow_two]
congr
simp_rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_two,
ENNReal.rpow_one, evariance]
/-- **Chebyshev's inequality**: one can control the deviation probability of a real random variable
from its expectation in terms of the variance. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) {c : ℝ}
(hc : 0 < c) : μ {ω | c ≤ |X ω - μ[X]|} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (variance X μ / c ^ 2) := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hc.ne.symm), hX.ofReal_variance_eq]
convert @meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq _ _ _ _ hX.1 c.toNNReal (by simp [hc]) using 1
· simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', max_le_iff, abs_nonneg, and_true]
· rw [ENNReal.ofReal_pow hc.le]
rfl
-- Porting note: supplied `MeasurableSpace Ω` argument of `h` by unification
/-- The variance of the sum of two independent random variables is the sum of the variances. -/
theorem IndepFun.variance_add [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ)
(hY : MemLp Y 2 μ) (h : IndepFun X Y μ) : variance (X + Y) μ = variance X μ + variance Y μ :=
calc
variance (X + Y) μ = μ[fun a => X a ^ 2 + Y a ^ 2 + 2 * X a * Y a] - μ[X + Y] ^ 2 := by
simp [variance_def' (hX.add hY), add_sq']
_ = μ[X ^ 2] + μ[Y ^ 2] + (2 : ℝ) * μ[X * Y] - (μ[X] + μ[Y]) ^ 2 := by
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.mul_apply, mul_assoc]
rw [integral_add, integral_add, integral_add, integral_const_mul]
· exact hX.integrable one_le_two
· exact hY.integrable one_le_two
· exact hX.integrable_sq
· exact hY.integrable_sq
· exact hX.integrable_sq.add hY.integrable_sq
· apply Integrable.const_mul
exact h.integrable_mul (hX.integrable one_le_two) (hY.integrable one_le_two)
_ = μ[X ^ 2] + μ[Y ^ 2] + 2 * (μ[X] * μ[Y]) - (μ[X] + μ[Y]) ^ 2 := by
congr
exact h.integral_mul_of_integrable (hX.integrable one_le_two) (hY.integrable one_le_two)
_ = variance X μ + variance Y μ := by simp only [variance_def', hX, hY, Pi.pow_apply]; ring
-- Porting note: supplied `MeasurableSpace Ω` argument of `hs`, `h` by unification
/-- The variance of a finite sum of pairwise independent random variables is the sum of the
variances. -/
theorem IndepFun.variance_sum [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Ω → ℝ}
{s : Finset ι} (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, MemLp (X i) 2 μ)
(h : Set.Pairwise ↑s fun i j => IndepFun (X i) (X j) μ) :
variance (∑ i ∈ s, X i) μ = ∑ i ∈ s, variance (X i) μ := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with k s ks IH
· simp only [Finset.sum_empty, variance_zero]
rw [variance_def' (memLp_finset_sum' _ hs), sum_insert ks, sum_insert ks]
simp only [add_sq']
calc
μ[(X k ^ 2 + (∑ i ∈ s, X i) ^ 2 + 2 * X k * ∑ i ∈ s, X i : Ω → ℝ)] - μ[X k + ∑ i ∈ s, X i] ^ 2 =
μ[X k ^ 2] + μ[(∑ i ∈ s, X i) ^ 2] + μ[2 * X k * ∑ i ∈ s, X i] -
(μ[X k] + μ[∑ i ∈ s, X i]) ^ 2 := by
rw [integral_add', integral_add', integral_add']
· exact MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _))
· apply integrable_finset_sum' _ fun i hi => ?_
exact MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi))
| · exact MemLp.integrable_sq (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _))
· apply MemLp.integrable_sq
exact memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i hi => hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· apply Integrable.add
· exact MemLp.integrable_sq (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _))
· apply MemLp.integrable_sq
exact memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i hi => hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· rw [mul_assoc]
apply Integrable.const_mul _ (2 : ℝ)
rw [mul_sum, sum_fn]
apply integrable_finset_sum _ fun i hi => ?_
apply IndepFun.integrable_mul _ (MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _)))
(MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi)))
apply h (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
exact fun hki => ks (hki.symm ▸ hi)
_ = variance (X k) μ + variance (∑ i ∈ s, X i) μ +
(μ[2 * X k * ∑ i ∈ s, X i] - 2 * μ[X k] * μ[∑ i ∈ s, X i]) := by
rw [variance_def' (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _)),
variance_def' (memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i hi => hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi))]
ring
_ = variance (X k) μ + variance (∑ i ∈ s, X i) μ := by
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.ofNat_apply, sum_apply, mul_sum, mul_assoc,
add_eq_left]
rw [integral_finset_sum s fun i hi => ?_]; swap
· apply Integrable.const_mul _ (2 : ℝ)
apply IndepFun.integrable_mul _ (MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _)))
(MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi)))
apply h (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
exact fun hki => ks (hki.symm ▸ hi)
rw [integral_finset_sum s fun i hi =>
MemLp.integrable one_le_two (hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi)),
mul_sum, mul_sum, ← sum_sub_distrib]
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => ?_
rw [integral_const_mul, IndepFun.integral_mul', sub_self]
· apply h (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi)
exact fun hki => ks (hki.symm ▸ hi)
· exact MemLp.aestronglyMeasurable (hs _ (mem_insert_self _ _))
· exact MemLp.aestronglyMeasurable (hs _ (mem_insert_of_mem hi))
_ = variance (X k) μ + ∑ i ∈ s, variance (X i) μ := by
rw [IH (fun i hi => hs i (mem_insert_of_mem hi))
(h.mono (by simp only [coe_insert, Set.subset_insert]))]
/-- **The Bhatia-Davis inequality on variance**
The variance of a random variable `X` satisfying `a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most
`(b - 𝔼 X) * (𝔼 X - a)`. -/
lemma variance_le_sub_mul_sub [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {a b : ℝ} {X : Ω → ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, X ω ∈ Set.Icc a b) (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) :
variance X μ ≤ (b - μ[X]) * (μ[X] - a) := by
have ha : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, a ≤ X ω := h.mono fun ω h => h.1
have hb : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, X ω ≤ b := h.mono fun ω h => h.2
have hX_int₂ : Integrable (fun ω ↦ -X ω ^ 2) μ :=
(memLp_of_bounded h hX.aestronglyMeasurable 2).integrable_sq.neg
have hX_int₁ : Integrable (fun ω ↦ (a + b) * X ω) μ :=
((integrable_const (max |a| |b|)).mono' hX.aestronglyMeasurable
(by filter_upwards [ha, hb] with ω using abs_le_max_abs_abs)).const_mul (a + b)
have h0 : 0 ≤ - μ[X ^ 2] + (a + b) * μ[X] - a * b :=
calc
| Mathlib/Probability/Variance.lean | 312 | 369 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
/-!
# Balanced Core and Balanced Hull
## Main definitions
* `balancedCore`: The largest balanced subset of a set `s`.
* `balancedHull`: The smallest balanced superset of a set `s`.
## Main statements
* `balancedCore_eq_iInter`: Characterization of the balanced core as an intersection over subsets.
* `nhds_basis_closed_balanced`: The closed balanced sets form a basis of the neighborhood filter.
## Implementation details
The balanced core and hull are implemented differently: for the core we take the obvious definition
of the union over all balanced sets that are contained in `s`, whereas for the hull, we take the
union over `r • s`, for `r` the scalars with `‖r‖ ≤ 1`. We show that `balancedHull` has the
defining properties of a hull in `Balanced.balancedHull_subset_of_subset` and `subset_balancedHull`.
For the core we need slightly stronger assumptions to obtain a characterization as an intersection,
this is `balancedCore_eq_iInter`.
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
## Tags
balanced
-/
open Set Pointwise Topology Filter
variable {𝕜 E ι : Type*}
section balancedHull
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E} {x : E}
/-- The largest balanced subset of `s`. -/
def balancedCore (s : Set E) :=
⋃₀ { t : Set E | Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s }
/-- Helper definition to prove `balanced_core_eq_iInter` -/
def balancedCoreAux (s : Set E) :=
⋂ (r : 𝕜) (_ : 1 ≤ ‖r‖), r • s
/-- The smallest balanced superset of `s`. -/
def balancedHull (s : Set E) :=
⋃ (r : 𝕜) (_ : ‖r‖ ≤ 1), r • s
variable {𝕜}
theorem balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) : balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ ht => ht.2
theorem balancedCore_empty : balancedCore 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty (balancedCore_subset _)
theorem mem_balancedCore_iff : x ∈ balancedCore 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ t, Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [balancedCore, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc]
theorem smul_balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) {a : 𝕜} (ha : ‖a‖ ≤ 1) :
a • balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 s := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [mem_balancedCore_iff] at hy
| rcases hy with ⟨t, ht1, ht2, hy⟩
exact ⟨t, ⟨ht1, ht2⟩, ht1 a ha (smul_mem_smul_set hy)⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/BalancedCoreHull.lean | 81 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Outer Measures
An outer measure is a function `μ : Set α → ℝ≥0∞`, from the powerset of a type to the extended
nonnegative real numbers that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is monotone;
3. `μ` is countably subadditive. This means that the outer measure of a countable union is at most
the sum of the outer measure on the individual sets.
Note that we do not need `α` to be measurable to define an outer measure.
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section OuterMeasureClass
variable {α ι F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α]
{μ : F} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
theorem measure_empty : μ ∅ = 0 := OuterMeasureClass.measure_empty μ
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem measure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : μ s ≤ μ t :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_mono μ h
theorem measure_mono_null (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ s = 0 :=
eq_bot_mono (measure_mono h) ht
lemma measure_eq_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s = ∞) : μ t = ∞ := eq_top_mono (measure_mono h) hs
lemma measure_lt_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono h).trans_lt ht
theorem measure_pos_of_superset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s ≠ 0) : 0 < μ t :=
hs.bot_lt.trans_le (measure_mono h)
theorem measure_iUnion_le [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) : μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, μ (s i) := by
refine rel_iSup_tsum μ measure_empty (· ≤ ·) (fun t ↦ ?_) _
calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) = μ (⋃ i, disjointed t i) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (disjointed t i) :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_iUnion_nat_le _ _ (disjoint_disjointed _)
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (t i) := by gcongr; exact disjointed_subset ..
theorem measure_biUnion_le {I : Set ι} (μ : F) (hI : I.Countable) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑' i : I, μ (s i) := by
have := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply measure_iUnion_le
theorem measure_biUnion_finset_le (I : Finset ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) :=
(measure_biUnion_le μ I.countable_toSet s).trans_eq <| I.tsum_subtype (μ <| s ·)
theorem measure_iUnion_fintype_le [Fintype ι] (μ : F) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑ i, μ (s i) := by
simpa using measure_biUnion_finset_le Finset.univ s
theorem measure_union_le (s t : Set α) : μ (s ∪ t) ≤ μ s + μ t := by
simpa [union_eq_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_fintype_le μ (cond · s t)
lemma measure_univ_le_add_compl (s : Set α) : μ univ ≤ μ s + μ sᶜ :=
s.union_compl_self ▸ measure_union_le s sᶜ
theorem measure_le_inter_add_diff (μ : F) (s t : Set α) : μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := by
simpa using measure_union_le (s ∩ t) (s \ t)
theorem measure_diff_null (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
(measure_mono diff_subset).antisymm <| calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ t + μ (s \ t) := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = μ (s \ t) := by simp [ht]
theorem measure_biUnion_null_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Countable) {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, μ (s i) = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h i hi ↦ measure_mono_null (subset_biUnion_of_mem hi) h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
have _ := hI.to_subtype
simpa [h] using measure_iUnion_le (μ := μ) fun x : I ↦ s x
theorem measure_sUnion_null_iff {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Countable) :
μ (⋃₀ S) = 0 ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = 0 := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion_null_iff hS]
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_null_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ (s i) = 0 := by
rw [← sUnion_range, measure_sUnion_null_iff (countable_range s), forall_mem_range]
alias ⟨_, measure_iUnion_null⟩ := measure_iUnion_null_iff
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_null_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 ∧ μ t = 0 := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem measure_union_null (hs : μ s = 0) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 := by simp [*]
lemma measure_null_iff_singleton (hs : s.Countable) : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ {x} = 0 := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_null_iff hs, biUnion_of_singleton]
/-- Let `μ` be an (outer) measure; let `s : ι → Set α` be a sequence of sets, `S = ⋃ n, s n`.
If `μ (S \ s n)` tends to zero along some nontrivial filter (usually `Filter.atTop` on `ι = ℕ`),
then `μ S = ⨆ n, μ (s n)`. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_of_tendsto_zero {ι} (μ : F) {s : ι → Set α} (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l]
(h0 : Tendsto (fun k => μ ((⋃ n, s n) \ s k)) l (𝓝 0)) : μ (⋃ n, s n) = ⨆ n, μ (s n) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| iSup_le fun n ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
set S := ⋃ n, s n
| set M := ⨆ n, μ (s n)
have A : ∀ k, μ S ≤ M + μ (S \ s k) := fun k ↦ calc
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Basic.lean | 132 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
(l.zipWith ((fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) (List.range l.length)).sum =
b * (l.zipWith (fun a i => a * b ^ i) (List.range l.length)).sum := by
suffices
l.zipWith (fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) (List.range l.length) =
l.zipWith (fun a i=> b * (a * b ^ i)) (List.range l.length)
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, List.zipIdx_eq_zip_range', List.map_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr, ← List.range_eq_range']
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_right, ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux] using
Or.inl hl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
@[norm_cast]
| theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 199 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.AddChar
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# The Fourier transform
We set up the Fourier transform for complex-valued functions on finite-dimensional spaces.
## Design choices
In namespace `VectorFourier`, we define the Fourier integral in the following context:
* `𝕜` is a commutative ring.
* `V` and `W` are `𝕜`-modules.
* `e` is a unitary additive character of `𝕜`, i.e. an `AddChar 𝕜 Circle`.
* `μ` is a measure on `V`.
* `L` is a `𝕜`-bilinear form `V × W → 𝕜`.
* `E` is a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space.
With these definitions, we define `fourierIntegral` to be the map from functions `V → E` to
functions `W → E` that sends `f` to
`fun w ↦ ∫ v in V, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ`,
This includes the cases `W` is the dual of `V` and `L` is the canonical pairing, or `W = V` and `L`
is a bilinear form (e.g. an inner product).
In namespace `Fourier`, we consider the more familiar special case when `V = W = 𝕜` and `L` is the
multiplication map (but still allowing `𝕜` to be an arbitrary ring equipped with a measure).
The most familiar case of all is when `V = W = 𝕜 = ℝ`, `L` is multiplication, `μ` is volume, and
`e` is `Real.fourierChar`, i.e. the character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we
introduced the notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`).
Another familiar case (which generalizes the previous one) is when `V = W` is an inner product space
over `ℝ` and `L` is the scalar product. We introduce two notations `𝓕` for the Fourier transform in
this case and `𝓕⁻ f (v) = 𝓕 f (-v)` for the inverse Fourier transform. These notations make
in particular sense for `V = W = ℝ`.
## Main results
At present the only nontrivial lemma we prove is `fourierIntegral_continuous`, stating that the
Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous (under mild assumptions).
-/
noncomputable section
local notation "𝕊" => Circle
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on general vector spaces -/
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V]
{W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module 𝕜 W]
{E F G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℂ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℂ G]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : V → E`, with respect to a bilinear form `L : V × W → 𝕜`
and an additive character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V) (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E)
(w : W) : E :=
∫ v, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ
theorem fourierIntegral_const_smul (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ L f := by
ext1 w
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, smul_comm _ r, integral_smul]
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier integral of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
‖fourierIntegral e μ L f w‖ ≤ ∫ v : V, ‖f v‖ ∂μ := by
refine (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
simp_rw [Circle.norm_smul]
/-- The Fourier integral converts right-translation into scalar multiplication by a phase factor. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_comp_add_right [MeasurableAdd V] (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
[μ.IsAddRightInvariant] (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (v₀ : V) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f ∘ fun v ↦ v + v₀) =
fun w ↦ e (L v₀ w) • fourierIntegral e μ L f w := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [fourierIntegral, Function.comp_apply, Circle.smul_def]
conv in L _ => rw [← add_sub_cancel_right v v₀]
rw [integral_add_right_eq_self fun v : V ↦ (e (-L (v - v₀) w) : ℂ) • f v, ← integral_smul]
congr 1 with v
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← Circle.coe_mul, ← e.map_add_eq_mul, ← LinearMap.neg_apply,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.map_sub, neg_sub]
end Defs
section Continuous
/-! In this section we assume 𝕜, `V`, `W` have topologies,
and `L`, `e` are continuous (but `f` needn't be).
This is used to ensure that `e (-L v w)` is (a.e. strongly) measurable. We could get away with
imposing only a measurable-space structure on 𝕜 (it doesn't have to be the Borel sigma-algebra of
a topology); but it seems hard to imagine cases where this extra generality would be useful, and
allowing it would complicate matters in the most important use cases.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [IsTopologicalRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace W] {e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊} {μ : Measure V} {L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜}
/-- For any `w`, the Fourier integral is convergent iff `f` is integrable. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_convergent_iff (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) {f : V → E} (w : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v w) • f v) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
-- first prove one-way implication
have aux {g : V → E} (hg : Integrable g μ) (x : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v x) • g v) μ := by
have c : Continuous fun v ↦ e (-L v x) := he.comp (hL.comp (.prodMk_left _)).neg
simp_rw [← integrable_norm_iff (c.aestronglyMeasurable.smul hg.1), Circle.norm_smul]
exact hg.norm
-- then use it for both directions
| refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ aux hf w⟩
have := aux hf (-w)
simp_rw [← mul_smul (e _) (e _) (f _), ← e.map_add_eq_mul, LinearMap.map_neg, neg_add_cancel,
e.map_zero_eq_one, one_smul] at this -- the `(e _)` speeds up elaboration considerably
exact this
theorem fourierIntegral_add (he : Continuous e) (hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2)
{f g : V → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f + g) = fourierIntegral e μ L f + fourierIntegral e μ L g := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [Pi.add_apply, fourierIntegral]
simp_rw [smul_add]
rw [integral_add]
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL w).2 hf
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL w).2 hg
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransform.lean | 132 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
| theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 555 | 556 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
/-!
# Integrals involving the Gamma function
In this file, we collect several integrals over `ℝ` or `ℂ` that evaluate in terms of the
`Real.Gamma` function.
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
section real
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : -1 < q) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p) = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / p * x ^ (1 / p - 1)) • ((x ^ (1 / p)) ^ q * exp (-x)) := by
rw [← integral_comp_rpow_Ioi _ (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp)),
abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt (one_div_pos.mpr hp))]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx) _ p, one_div_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hp), rpow_one]
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, 1 / p * exp (-x) * x ^ (1 / p - 1 + q / p) := by
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul, rpow_add hx]
ring_nf
_ = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral (div_pos (neg_lt_iff_pos_add.mp hq) hp)]
simp_rw [show 1 / p - 1 + q / p = (q + 1) / p - 1 by field_simp; ring, ← integral_const_mul,
← mul_assoc]
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p q b : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : -1 < q) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- b * x ^ p) =
b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * ((b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ q * rexp (-(b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ p)) := by
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_mul,
inv_mul_cancel₀, rpow_one, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_add, neg_mul p⁻¹, neg_add_cancel,
rpow_zero, one_mul, neg_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = (b ^ p⁻¹)⁻¹ * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * rexp (-x ^ p)) := by
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x => b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p))) 0,
mul_zero, smul_eq_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [integral_const_mul, integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow _ hq, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_add]
· congr; ring
all_goals positivity
theorem integral_exp_neg_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), exp (- x ^ p) = Gamma (1 / p + 1) := by
convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hp neg_one_lt_zero) using 1
· simp_rw [rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Gamma_add_one (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp))]
theorem integral_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p b : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), exp (- b * x ^ p) = b ^ (- 1 / p) * Gamma (1 / p + 1) := by
convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow hp neg_one_lt_zero hb) using 1
· simp_rw [rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Gamma_add_one (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp)), mul_assoc]
end real
section complex
theorem Complex.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p q : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hq : -2 < q) :
∫ x : ℂ, ‖x‖ ^ q * rexp (- ‖x‖ ^ p) = (2 * π / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ) ×ˢ Ioo (-π) π, x.1 * (|x.1| ^ q * rexp (-|x.1| ^ p)) := by
rw [← Complex.integral_comp_polarCoord_symm, polarCoord_target]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_polarCoord_symm, smul_eq_mul]
_ = (∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (-|x| ^ p)) * ∫ _ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
simp_rw [mul_one]
congr! 2; ring
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (-|x| ^ p) := by
simp_rw [integral_const, measureReal_restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
volume_real_Ioo_of_le (a := -π) (b := π) (by linarith [pi_nonneg]),
sub_neg_eq_add, ← two_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm]
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ (q + 1) * rexp (-x ^ p) := by
congr 1
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx.le, rpow_add hx, rpow_one]
ring
_ = (2 * Real.pi / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
rw [_root_.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow (by linarith) (by linarith), add_assoc,
one_add_one_eq_two]
ring
|
theorem Complex.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p q b : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hq : -2 < q)
(hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x : ℂ, ‖x‖ ^ q * rexp (- b * ‖x‖ ^ p) = (2 * π / p) *
b ^ (-(q + 2) / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ) ×ˢ Ioo (-π) π, x.1 * (|x.1| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x.1| ^ p)) := by
rw [← Complex.integral_comp_polarCoord_symm, polarCoord_target]
simp_rw [Complex.norm_polarCoord_symm, smul_eq_mul]
_ = (∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x| ^ p)) * ∫ _ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul, volume_eq_prod]
simp_rw [mul_one]
congr! 2; ring
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x * |x| ^ q * rexp (- b * |x| ^ p) := by
simp_rw [integral_const, measureReal_restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
volume_real_Ioo_of_le (a := -π) (b := π) (by linarith [pi_nonneg]),
sub_neg_eq_add, ← two_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm]
_ = 2 * π * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ (q + 1) * rexp (-b * x ^ p) := by
congr 1
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx.le, rpow_add hx, rpow_one]
ring
_ = (2 * π / p) * b ^ (-(q + 2) / p) * Real.Gamma ((q + 2) / p) := by
rw [_root_.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow (by linarith) (by linarith) hb, add_assoc,
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Gamma.lean | 99 | 123 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.