Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Continuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Normed groups are uniform groups
This file proves lipschitzness of normed group operations and shows that normed groups are uniform
groups.
-/
variable {𝓕 E F : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] {s : Set E} {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_right : IsIsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
| for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Uniform.lean | 93 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.LinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Finite and free modules using matrices
We provide some instances for finite and free modules involving matrices.
## Main results
* `Module.Free.linearMap` : if `M` and `N` are finite and free, then `M →ₗ[R] N` is free.
* `Module.Finite.ofBasis` : A free module with a basis indexed by a `Fintype` is finite.
* `Module.Finite.linearMap` : if `M` and `N` are finite and free, then `M →ₗ[R] N`
is finite.
-/
universe u u' v w
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type u') (M : Type v) (N : Type w)
open Module.Free (chooseBasis ChooseBasisIndex)
open Module (finrank)
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
private noncomputable def linearMapEquivFun : (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[S] ChooseBasisIndex R M → N :=
(chooseBasis R M).repr.congrLeft N S ≪≫ₗ (Finsupp.lsum S).symm ≪≫ₗ
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun _ ↦ LinearMap.ringLmapEquivSelf R S N
instance Module.Free.linearMap [Module.Free S N] : Module.Free S (M →ₗ[R] N) :=
Module.Free.of_equiv (linearMapEquivFun R S M N).symm
instance Module.Finite.linearMap [Module.Finite S N] : Module.Finite S (M →ₗ[R] N) :=
Module.Finite.equiv (linearMapEquivFun R S M N).symm
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [StrongRankCondition S] [Module.Free S N]
open Cardinal
theorem Module.rank_linearMap :
Module.rank S (M →ₗ[R] N) = lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) * lift.{v} (Module.rank S N) := by
rw [(linearMapEquivFun R S M N).rank_eq, rank_fun_eq_lift_mul,
← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, ← finrank_eq_rank R, lift_natCast]
/-- The finrank of `M →ₗ[R] N` as an `S`-module is `(finrank R M) * (finrank S N)`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_linearMap :
finrank S (M →ₗ[R] N) = finrank R M * finrank S N := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_linearMap, toNat_mul, toNat_lift]
variable [Module R S] [SMulCommClass R S S]
theorem Module.rank_linearMap_self :
Module.rank S (M →ₗ[R] S) = lift.{u'} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_linearMap, rank_self, lift_one, mul_one]
theorem Module.finrank_linearMap_self : finrank S (M →ₗ[R] S) = finrank R M := by
rw [finrank_linearMap, finrank_self, mul_one]
end Ring
|
section AlgHom
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FreeModule/Finite/Matrix.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
/-!
# Product of homotopies
In this file, we introduce definitions for the product of
homotopies. We show that the products of relative homotopies
are still relative homotopies. Finally, we specialize to the case
of path homotopies, and provide the definition for the product of path classes.
We show various lemmas associated with these products, such as the fact that
path products commute with path composition, and that projection is the inverse
of products.
## Definitions
### General homotopies
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi homotopies`: Let f and g be a family of functions
indexed on I, such that for each i ∈ I, fᵢ and gᵢ are maps from A to Xᵢ.
Let `homotopies` be a family of homotopies from fᵢ to gᵢ for each i.
Then `Homotopy.pi homotopies` is the canonical homotopy
from ∏ f to ∏ g, where ∏ f is the product map from A to Πi, Xᵢ,
and similarly for ∏ g.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi homotopies`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod F G` is the product of homotopies F and G,
where F is a homotopy between f₀ and f₁, G is a homotopy between g₀ and g₁.
The result F × G is a homotopy between (f₀ × g₀) and (f₁ × g₁).
Again, all homotopies are done relative to S.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod F G`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
### Path products
- `Path.Homotopic.pi` The product of a family of path classes, where a path class is an equivalence
class of paths up to path homotopy.
- `Path.Homotopic.prod` The product of two path classes.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
open ContinuousMap
section Pi
variable {I A : Type*} {X : I → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [TopologicalSpace A]
{f g : ∀ i, C(A, X i)} {S : Set A}
/-- The relative product homotopy of `homotopies` between functions `f` and `g` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.pi (homotopies : ∀ i : I, HomotopyRel (f i) (g i) S) :
HomotopyRel (pi f) (pi g) S :=
{ Homotopy.pi fun i => (homotopies i).toHomotopy with
prop' := by
intro t x hx
dsimp only [coe_mk, pi_eval, toFun_eq_coe, HomotopyWith.coe_toContinuousMap]
simp only [funext_iff, ← forall_and]
intro i
exact (homotopies i).prop' t x hx }
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {A : Type*} [TopologicalSpace A]
{f₀ f₁ : C(A, α)} {g₀ g₁ : C(A, β)} {S : Set A}
/-- The product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps]
def Homotopy.prod (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (G : Homotopy g₀ g₁) :
Homotopy (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₀ g₀) (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₁ g₁) where
toFun t := (F t, G t)
map_zero_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_zero]
map_one_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_one]
/-- The relative product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.prod (F : HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S) (G : HomotopyRel g₀ g₁ S) :
HomotopyRel (prodMk f₀ g₀) (prodMk f₁ g₁) S where
toHomotopy := Homotopy.prod F.toHomotopy G.toHomotopy
prop' t x hx := Prod.ext (F.prop' t x hx) (G.prop' t x hx)
end Prod
end ContinuousMap
namespace Path.Homotopic
attribute [local instance] Path.Homotopic.setoid
local infixl:70 " ⬝ " => Quotient.comp
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, X i}
/-- The product of a family of path homotopies. This is just a specialization of `HomotopyRel`. -/
def piHomotopy (γ₀ γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (H : ∀ i, Path.Homotopy (γ₀ i) (γ₁ i)) :
Path.Homotopy (Path.pi γ₀) (Path.pi γ₁) :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi H
/-- The product of a family of path homotopy classes. -/
def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs :=
(Quotient.map Path.pi fun x y hxy =>
Nonempty.map (piHomotopy x y) (Classical.nonempty_pi.mpr hxy)) (Quotient.choice γ)
theorem pi_lift (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) :
(Path.Homotopic.pi fun i => ⟦γ i⟧) = ⟦Path.pi γ⟧ := by unfold pi; simp
/-- Composition and products commute.
This is `Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans` descended to path homotopy classes. -/
theorem comp_pi_eq_pi_comp (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i))
(γ₁ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (bs i) (cs i)) : pi γ₀ ⬝ pi γ₁ = pi fun i ↦ γ₀ i ⬝ γ₁ i := by
induction γ₁ using Quotient.induction_on_pi with | _ a =>
induction γ₀ using Quotient.induction_on_pi
simp only [pi_lift]
rw [← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans, ← pi_lift]
rfl
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the ith coordinate. -/
abbrev proj (i : ι) (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i) :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_apply i⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of pi. -/
@[simp]
theorem proj_pi (i : ι) (paths : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) :
proj i (pi paths) = paths i := by
induction paths using Quotient.induction_on_pi
rw [proj, pi_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem pi_proj (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : (pi fun i => proj i p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp_rw [proj, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
erw [pi_lift]
congr
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {a₁ a₂ a₃ : α} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : β}
{p₁ p₁' : Path a₁ a₂} {p₂ p₂' : Path b₁ b₂} (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂)
(q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂)
/-- The product of homotopies h₁ and h₂.
This is `HomotopyRel.prod` specialized for path homotopies. -/
def prodHomotopy (h₁ : Path.Homotopy p₁ p₁') (h₂ : Path.Homotopy p₂ p₂') :
Path.Homotopy (p₁.prod p₂) (p₁'.prod p₂') :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod h₁ h₂
/-- The product of path classes q₁ and q₂. This is `Path.prod` descended to the quotient. -/
def prod (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂) (q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂) :
Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) :=
Quotient.map₂ Path.prod (fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ => Nonempty.map2 prodHomotopy h₁ h₂) q₁ q₂
variable (p₁ p₁' p₂ p₂')
theorem prod_lift : prod ⟦p₁⟧ ⟦p₂⟧ = ⟦p₁.prod p₂⟧ :=
rfl
variable (r₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₂ a₃) (r₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₂ b₃)
/-- Products commute with path composition.
This is `trans_prod_eq_prod_trans` descended to the quotient. -/
theorem comp_prod_eq_prod_comp : prod q₁ q₂ ⬝ prod r₁ r₂ = prod (q₁ ⬝ r₁) (q₂ ⬝ r₂) := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
induction r₁, r₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
simp only [prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans]
variable {c₁ c₂ : α × β}
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the left coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projLeft (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.1 c₂.1 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_fst⟩
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the right coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.2 c₂.2 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_snd⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of product. -/
@[simp]
theorem projLeft_prod : projLeft (prod q₁ q₂) = q₁ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projLeft, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem projRight_prod : projRight (prod q₁ q₂) = q₂ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projRight, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem prod_projLeft_projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)) :
prod (projLeft p) (projRight p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp only [projLeft, projRight, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift, prod_lift]
congr
end Prod
end Path.Homotopic
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Product.lean | 229 | 234 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
/-!
# Power basis for `Algebra.adjoin R {x}`
This file defines the canonical power basis on `Algebra.adjoin R {x}`,
where `x` is an integral element over `R`.
-/
variable {K S : Type*} [Field K] [CommRing S] [Algebra K S]
namespace Algebra
open Polynomial
open PowerBasis
/-- The elements `1, x, ..., x ^ (d - 1)` for a basis for the `K`-module `K[x]`,
where `d` is the degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. -/
noncomputable def adjoin.powerBasisAux {x : S} (hx : IsIntegral K x) :
Basis (Fin (minpoly K x).natDegree) K (adjoin K ({x} : Set S)) := by
have hST : Function.Injective (algebraMap (adjoin K ({x} : Set S)) S) := Subtype.coe_injective
have hx' :
IsIntegral K (⟨x, subset_adjoin (Set.mem_singleton x)⟩ : adjoin K ({x} : Set S)) := by
apply (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff hST).mp
convert hx
apply Basis.mk (v := fun i : Fin _ ↦ ⟨x, subset_adjoin (Set.mem_singleton x)⟩ ^ (i : ℕ))
· have : LinearIndependent K _ := linearIndependent_pow
(⟨x, self_mem_adjoin_singleton _ _⟩ : adjoin K {x})
rwa [← minpoly.algebraMap_eq hST] at this
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ _
have := hx'.mem_span_pow (y := ⟨y, hy⟩)
rw [← minpoly.algebraMap_eq hST] at this
apply this
rw [adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval] at hy
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := (aeval x).mem_range.mp hy
use f
ext
exact aeval_algebraMap_apply S (⟨x, _⟩ : adjoin K {x}) _
/-- The power basis `1, x, ..., x ^ (d - 1)` for `K[x]`,
where `d` is the degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. See `Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis'` for
a version over a more general base ring. -/
@[simps gen dim]
noncomputable def adjoin.powerBasis {x : S} (hx : IsIntegral K x) :
PowerBasis K (adjoin K ({x} : Set S)) where
gen := ⟨x, subset_adjoin (Set.mem_singleton x)⟩
dim := (minpoly K x).natDegree
basis := adjoin.powerBasisAux hx
basis_eq_pow i := by rw [adjoin.powerBasisAux, Basis.mk_apply]
end Algebra
open Algebra
/-- The power basis given by `x` if `B.gen ∈ adjoin K {x}`. See `PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin'`
for a version over a more general base ring. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin {x : S} (B : PowerBasis K S) (hint : IsIntegral K x)
(hx : B.gen ∈ adjoin K ({x} : Set S)) : PowerBasis K S :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis hint).map <|
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ <| PowerBasis.adjoin_eq_top_of_gen_mem_adjoin hx).trans
Subalgebra.topEquiv
section IsIntegral
namespace PowerBasis
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R K] [IsScalarTower R K S]
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] {B : PowerBasis S A}
/-- If `B : PowerBasis S A` is such that `IsIntegral R B.gen`, then
`IsIntegral R (B.basis.repr (B.gen ^ n) i)` for all `i` if
`minpoly S B.gen = (minpoly R B.gen).map (algebraMap R S)`. This is the case if `R` is a GCD domain
and `S` is its fraction ring. -/
theorem repr_gen_pow_isIntegral (hB : IsIntegral R B.gen)
(hmin : minpoly S B.gen = (minpoly R B.gen).map (algebraMap R S)) (n : ℕ) :
∀ i, IsIntegral R (B.basis.repr (B.gen ^ n) i) := by
intro i
nontriviality S
let Q := X ^ n %ₘ minpoly R B.gen
have : B.gen ^ n = aeval B.gen Q := by
rw [← @aeval_X_pow R _ _ _ _ B.gen, ← modByMonic_add_div (X ^ n) (minpoly.monic hB)]
simp [Q]
| by_cases hQ : Q = 0
· simp [this, hQ, isIntegral_zero]
have hlt : Q.natDegree < B.dim := by
rw [← B.natDegree_minpoly, hmin, (minpoly.monic hB).natDegree_map,
natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hQ]
letI : Nontrivial R := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hQ
exact degree_modByMonic_lt _ (minpoly.monic hB)
rw [this, aeval_eq_sum_range' hlt]
simp only [map_sum, LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, Finset.sum_apply']
refine IsIntegral.sum _ fun j hj => ?_
replace hj := Finset.mem_range.1 hj
rw [← Fin.val_mk hj, ← B.basis_eq_pow, Algebra.smul_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S A, ←
Algebra.smul_def, LinearEquiv.map_smul]
simp only [algebraMap_smul, Finsupp.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, B.basis.repr_self_apply]
by_cases hij : (⟨j, hj⟩ : Fin _) = i
· simp only [hij, eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
exact isIntegral_algebraMap
· simp [hij, isIntegral_zero]
/-- Let `B : PowerBasis S A` be such that `IsIntegral R B.gen`, and let `x y : A` be elements with
integral coordinates in the base `B.basis`. Then `IsIntegral R ((B.basis.repr (x * y) i)` for all
`i` if `minpoly S B.gen = (minpoly R B.gen).map (algebraMap R S)`. This is the case if `R` is a GCD
domain and `S` is its fraction ring. -/
theorem repr_mul_isIntegral (hB : IsIntegral R B.gen) {x y : A}
(hx : ∀ i, IsIntegral R (B.basis.repr x i)) (hy : ∀ i, IsIntegral R (B.basis.repr y i))
(hmin : minpoly S B.gen = (minpoly R B.gen).map (algebraMap R S)) :
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Adjoin/PowerBasis.lean | 97 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.MeasureComp
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.CondDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
/-!
# Kernel associated with a conditional expectation
We define `condExpKernel μ m`, a kernel from `Ω` to `Ω` such that for all integrable functions `f`,
`μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
This kernel is defined if `Ω` is a standard Borel space. In general, `μ⟦s | m⟧` maps a measurable
set `s` to a function `Ω → ℝ≥0∞`, and for all `s` that map is unique up to a `μ`-null set. For all
`a`, the map from sets to `ℝ≥0∞` that we obtain that way verifies some of the properties of a
measure, but the fact that the `μ`-null set depends on `s` can prevent us from finding versions of
the conditional expectation that combine into a true measure. The standard Borel space assumption
on `Ω` allows us to do so.
## Main definitions
* `condExpKernel μ m`: kernel such that `μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
## Main statements
* `condExp_ae_eq_integral_condExpKernel`: `μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section AuxLemmas
variable {Ω F : Type*} {m mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Ω → F}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_snd_map_prod_id [TopologicalSpace F]
(hm : m ≤ mΩ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m.prod mΩ] (fun x : Ω × Ω => f x.2)
(@Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω => (id ω, id ω)) μ) := by
rw [← aestronglyMeasurable_comp_snd_map_prodMk_iff (measurable_id'' hm)] at hf
simp_rw [id] at hf ⊢
exact hf
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_snd_map_prod_id [NormedAddCommGroup F] (hm : m ≤ mΩ)
(hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun x : Ω × Ω => f x.2)
(@Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω => (id ω, id ω)) μ) := by
rw [← integrable_comp_snd_map_prodMk_iff (measurable_id'' hm)] at hf
simp_rw [id] at hf ⊢
exact hf
end AuxLemmas
variable {Ω F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} [mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω]
[StandardBorelSpace Ω] {μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
open Classical in
/-- Kernel associated with the conditional expectation with respect to a σ-algebra. It satisfies
`μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
It is defined as the conditional distribution of the identity given the identity, where the second
identity is understood as a map from `Ω` with the σ-algebra `mΩ` to `Ω` with σ-algebra `m ⊓ mΩ`.
We use `m ⊓ mΩ` instead of `m` to ensure that it is a sub-σ-algebra of `mΩ`. We then use
`Kernel.comap` to get a kernel from `m` to `mΩ` instead of from `m ⊓ mΩ` to `mΩ`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def condExpKernel (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(m : MeasurableSpace Ω) : @Kernel Ω Ω m mΩ :=
if _h : Nonempty Ω then
Kernel.comap (@condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _) id
(measurable_id'' (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m))
else 0
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpKernel := condExpKernel
lemma condExpKernel_eq (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : Nonempty Ω]
(m : MeasurableSpace Ω) :
condExpKernel (mΩ := mΩ) μ m = Kernel.comap (@condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _) id
(measurable_id'' (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m)) := by
simp [condExpKernel, h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpKernel_eq := condExpKernel_eq
lemma condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib [Nonempty Ω] {ω : Ω} :
condExpKernel μ m ω = @condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _ (id ω) := by
simp [condExpKernel_eq, Kernel.comap_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib := condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib
instance : IsMarkovKernel (condExpKernel μ m) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty Ω with h | h
· exact ⟨fun a ↦ (IsEmpty.false a).elim⟩
· simp [condExpKernel, h]; infer_instance
lemma compProd_trim_condExpKernel (hm : m ≤ mΩ) :
(μ.trim hm) ⊗ₘ condExpKernel μ m
= @Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω ↦ (id ω, id ω)) μ := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty Ω with h | h
· simp [Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty μ]
rw [condExpKernel_eq]
have : m ⊓ mΩ = m := inf_of_le_left hm
have h := compProd_map_condDistrib (mβ := m) (μ := μ) (X := id) measurable_id.aemeasurable
rw [← h, trim_eq_map hm]
congr 1
ext a s hs
simp only [Kernel.coe_comap, Function.comp_apply, id_eq]
congr
lemma condExpKernel_comp_trim (hm : m ≤ mΩ) : condExpKernel μ m ∘ₘ μ.trim hm = μ := by
rw [← Measure.snd_compProd, compProd_trim_condExpKernel, @Measure.snd_map_prodMk, Measure.map_id]
exact measurable_id'' hm
section Measurability
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : Ω → F}
theorem measurable_condExpKernel {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[m] fun ω => condExpKernel μ m ω s := by
nontriviality Ω
simp_rw [condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib]
refine Measurable.mono ?_ (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m) le_rfl
convert measurable_condDistrib (μ := μ) hs
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_id]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias measurable_condexpKernel := measurable_condExpKernel
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] fun ω => condExpKernel μ m ω s :=
Measurable.stronglyMeasurable (measurable_condExpKernel hs)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_condexpKernel := stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel' [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable[m ⊓ mΩ] (fun ω ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂condExpKernel μ m ω) := by
nontriviality Ω
simp_rw [condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib]
exact (hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd).integral_condDistrib
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] (fun ω ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂condExpKernel μ m ω) :=
hf.integral_condExpKernel'.mono inf_le_left
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂condExpKernel μ m ω) μ := by
nontriviality Ω
simp_rw [condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_condDistrib
(aemeasurable_id'' μ (inf_le_right : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ mΩ)) aemeasurable_id
(hf.comp_snd_map_prod_id inf_le_right)
|
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_condexpKernel :=
_root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Condexp.lean | 159 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
/-!
# Partial Equivalences
In this file, we define partial equivalences `PEquiv`, which are a bijection between a subset of `α`
and a subset of `β`. Notationally, a `PEquiv` is denoted by "`≃.`" (note that the full stop is part
of the notation). The way we store these internally is with two functions `f : α → Option β` and
the reverse function `g : β → Option α`, with the condition that if `f a` is `some b`,
then `g b` is `some a`.
## Main results
- `PEquiv.ofSet`: creates a `PEquiv` from a set `s`,
which sends an element to itself if it is in `s`.
- `PEquiv.single`: given two elements `a : α` and `b : β`, create a `PEquiv` that sends them to
each other, and ignores all other elements.
- `PEquiv.injective_of_forall_ne_isSome`/`injective_of_forall_isSome`: If the domain of a `PEquiv`
is all of `α` (except possibly one point), its `toFun` is injective.
## Canonical order
`PEquiv` is canonically ordered by inclusion; that is, if a function `f` defined on a subset `s`
is equal to `g` on that subset, but `g` is also defined on a larger set, then `f ≤ g`. We also have
a definition of `⊥`, which is the empty `PEquiv` (sends all to `none`), which in the end gives us a
`SemilatticeInf` with an `OrderBot` instance.
## Tags
pequiv, partial equivalence
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u v w x
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
structure PEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
/-- The underlying partial function of a `PEquiv` -/
toFun : α → Option β
/-- The partial inverse of `toFun` -/
invFun : β → Option α
/-- `invFun` is the partial inverse of `toFun` -/
inv : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a ∈ invFun b ↔ b ∈ toFun a
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
infixr:25 " ≃. " => PEquiv
namespace PEquiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
open Function Option
instance : FunLike (α ≃. β) α (Option β) :=
{ coe := toFun
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨f₁, f₂, hf⟩ ⟨g₁, g₂, hg⟩ (rfl : f₁ = g₁)
congr with y x
simp only [hf, hg] }
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ h) : (mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) = f₁ :=
rfl
theorem coe_mk_apply (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ : β → Option α) (h) (x : α) :
(PEquiv.mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : α ≃. β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- The identity map as a partial equivalence. -/
@[refl]
protected def refl (α : Type*) : α ≃. α where
toFun := some
invFun := some
inv _ _ := eq_comm
/-- The inverse partial equivalence. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (f : α ≃. β) : β ≃. α where
toFun := f.2
invFun := f.1
inv _ _ := (f.inv _ _).symm
theorem mem_iff_mem (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, a ∈ f.symm b ↔ b ∈ f a :=
f.3 _ _
theorem eq_some_iff (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, f.symm b = some a ↔ f a = some b :=
f.3 _ _
/-- Composition of partial equivalences `f : α ≃. β` and `g : β ≃. γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) :
α ≃. γ where
toFun a := (f a).bind g
invFun a := (g.symm a).bind f.symm
inv a b := by simp_all [and_comm, eq_some_iff f, eq_some_iff g, bind_eq_some_iff]
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (a : α) : PEquiv.refl α a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_refl : (PEquiv.refl α).symm = PEquiv.refl α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (f : α ≃. β) : f.symm.symm = f := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (PEquiv.symm : (α ≃. β) → β ≃. α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
theorem symm_injective : Function.Injective (@PEquiv.symm α β) :=
symm_bijective.injective
theorem trans_assoc (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (h : γ ≃. δ) :
(f.trans g).trans h = f.trans (g.trans h) :=
ext fun _ => Option.bind_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
c ∈ f.trans g a ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ f a ∧ c ∈ g b :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_some (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
f.trans g a = some c ↔ ∃ b, f a = some b ∧ g b = some c :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_none (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) :
f.trans g a = none ↔ ∀ b c, b ∉ f a ∨ c ∉ g b := by
simp only [eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_trans, imp_iff_not_or.symm]
push_neg
exact forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (f : α ≃. β) : (PEquiv.refl α).trans f = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (f : α ≃. β) : f.trans (PEquiv.refl β) = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; simp
protected theorem inj (f : α ≃. β) {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} (h₁ : b ∈ f a₁) (h₂ : b ∈ f a₂) :
a₁ = a₂ := by rw [← mem_iff_mem] at *; cases h : f.symm b <;> simp_all
/-- If the domain of a `PEquiv` is `α` except a point, its forward direction is injective. -/
| theorem injective_of_forall_ne_isSome (f : α ≃. β) (a₂ : α)
(h : ∀ a₁ : α, a₁ ≠ a₂ → isSome (f a₁)) : Injective f :=
HasLeftInverse.injective
⟨fun b => Option.recOn b a₂ fun b' => Option.recOn (f.symm b') a₂ id, fun x => by
classical
| Mathlib/Data/PEquiv.lean | 161 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Transferring `Traversable` instances along isomorphisms
This file allows to transfer `Traversable` instances along isomorphisms.
## Main declarations
* `Equiv.map`: Turns functorially a function `α → β` into a function `t' α → t' β` using the functor
`t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `Equiv.functor`: `Equiv.map` as a functor.
* `Equiv.traverse`: Turns traversably a function `α → m β` into a function `t' α → m (t' β)` using
the traversable functor `t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `Equiv.traversable`: `Equiv.traverse` as a traversable functor.
* `Equiv.isLawfulTraversable`: `Equiv.traverse` as a lawful traversable functor.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
section Functor
-- Porting note: `parameter` doesn't seem to work yet.
variable {t t' : Type u → Type u} (eqv : ∀ α, t α ≃ t' α)
variable [Functor t]
open Functor
/-- Given a functor `t`, a function `t' : Type u → Type u`, and
equivalences `t α ≃ t' α` for all `α`, then every function `α → β` can
be mapped to a function `t' α → t' β` functorially (see
`Equiv.functor`). -/
protected def map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (x : t' α) : t' β :=
eqv β <| map f ((eqv α).symm x)
/-- The function `Equiv.map` transfers the functoriality of `t` to
`t'` using the equivalences `eqv`. -/
protected def functor : Functor t' where map := Equiv.map eqv
variable [LawfulFunctor t]
protected theorem id_map {α : Type u} (x : t' α) : Equiv.map eqv id x = x := by
simp [Equiv.map, id_map]
protected theorem comp_map {α β γ : Type u} (g : α → β) (h : β → γ) (x : t' α) :
Equiv.map eqv (h ∘ g) x = Equiv.map eqv h (Equiv.map eqv g x) := by
simp [Equiv.map, Function.comp_def]
protected theorem lawfulFunctor : @LawfulFunctor _ (Equiv.functor eqv) :=
-- Porting note: why is `_inst` required here?
let _inst := Equiv.functor eqv; {
map_const := fun {_ _} => rfl
id_map := Equiv.id_map eqv
comp_map := Equiv.comp_map eqv }
protected theorem lawfulFunctor' [F : Functor t']
(h₀ : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β), Functor.map f = Equiv.map eqv f)
(h₁ : ∀ {α β} (f : β), Functor.mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f) :
LawfulFunctor t' := by
have : F = Equiv.functor eqv := by
cases F
dsimp [Equiv.functor]
congr <;> ext <;> dsimp only <;> [rw [← h₀]; rw [← h₁]] <;> rfl
subst this
exact Equiv.lawfulFunctor eqv
end Functor
section Traversable
variable {t t' : Type u → Type u} (eqv : ∀ α, t α ≃ t' α)
variable [Traversable t]
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Applicative m]
variable {α β : Type u}
/-- Like `Equiv.map`, a function `t' : Type u → Type u` can be given
the structure of a traversable functor using a traversable functor
`t'` and equivalences `t α ≃ t' α` for all α. See `Equiv.traversable`. -/
protected def traverse (f : α → m β) (x : t' α) : m (t' β) :=
eqv β <$> traverse f ((eqv α).symm x)
theorem traverse_def (f : α → m β) (x : t' α) :
Equiv.traverse eqv f x = eqv β <$> traverse f ((eqv α).symm x) :=
rfl
/-- The function `Equiv.traverse` transfers a traversable functor
instance across the equivalences `eqv`. -/
protected def traversable : Traversable t' where
toFunctor := Equiv.functor eqv
traverse := Equiv.traverse eqv
end Traversable
section Equiv
variable {t t' : Type u → Type u} (eqv : ∀ α, t α ≃ t' α)
-- Is this to do with the fact it lives in `Type (u+1)` not `Prop`?
variable [Traversable t] [LawfulTraversable t]
variable {F G : Type u → Type u} [Applicative F] [Applicative G]
variable [LawfulApplicative F] [LawfulApplicative G]
variable (η : ApplicativeTransformation F G)
variable {α β γ : Type u}
open LawfulTraversable Functor
protected theorem id_traverse (x : t' α) : Equiv.traverse eqv (pure : α → Id α) x = x := by
rw [Equiv.traverse, id_traverse, Id.map_eq, apply_symm_apply]
protected theorem traverse_eq_map_id (f : α → β) (x : t' α) :
Equiv.traverse eqv ((pure : β → Id β) ∘ f) x = pure (Equiv.map eqv f x) := by
simp only [Equiv.traverse, traverse_eq_map_id, Id.map_eq, Id.pure_eq]; rfl
protected theorem comp_traverse (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : t' α) :
Equiv.traverse eqv (Comp.mk ∘ Functor.map f ∘ g) x =
Comp.mk (Equiv.traverse eqv f <$> Equiv.traverse eqv g x) := by
rw [traverse_def, comp_traverse, Comp.map_mk]
simp only [map_map, Function.comp_def, traverse_def, symm_apply_apply]
protected theorem naturality (f : α → F β) (x : t' α) :
η (Equiv.traverse eqv f x) = Equiv.traverse eqv (@η _ ∘ f) x := by
simp only [Equiv.traverse, functor_norm]
| /-- The fact that `t` is a lawful traversable functor carries over the
equivalences to `t'`, with the traversable functor structure given by
`Equiv.traversable`. -/
| Mathlib/Control/Traversable/Equiv.lean | 133 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
· exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
· simp only [← ih]
exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
theorem lcs_le_self : N.lcs k ≤ N := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih).trans (N.lie_le_right ⊤)
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap : lowerCentralSeries R L N k = (N.lcs k).comap N.incl := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at ih ⊢
have : N.lcs k ≤ N.incl.range := by
rw [N.range_incl]
apply lcs_le_self
rw [ih, LieSubmodule.comap_bracket_eq _ N.incl _ N.ker_incl this]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs : (lowerCentralSeries R L N k).map N.incl = N.lcs k := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.map_comap_incl, inf_eq_right]
apply lcs_le_self
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot:
lowerCentralSeries R L N k = ⊥ ↔ lcs k N = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← N.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs, ← LieModuleHom.le_ker_iff_map]
simpa
· rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, comap_incl_eq_bot]
simp [h]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable {M₂ : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (R L M)
theorem antitone_lowerCentralSeries : Antitone <| lowerCentralSeries R L M := by
intro l k
induction k generalizing l with
| zero => exact fun h ↦ (Nat.le_zero.mp h).symm ▸ le_rfl
| succ k ih =>
intro h
rcases Nat.of_le_succ h with (hk | hk)
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (ih hk)).trans (LieSubmodule.lie_le_right _ _)
· exact hk.symm ▸ le_rfl
theorem eventually_iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq [IsArtinian R M] :
∀ᶠ l in Filter.atTop, ⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = lowerCentralSeries R L M l := by
have h_wf : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ :=
LieSubmodule.wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → lowerCentralSeries R L M n = lowerCentralSeries R L M m⟩ :=
h_wf.monotone_chain_condition ⟨_, antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M⟩
refine Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun l hl ↦ le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun m ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases le_or_lt l m with h | h
· rw [← hn _ hl, ← hn _ (hl.trans h)]
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (le_of_lt h)
theorem trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot : IsTrivial L M ↔ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp
· rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] at h; apply IsTrivial.mk; intro x m; apply h
apply LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
simp only [LieSubmodule.top_coe, Subtype.exists, LieSubmodule.mem_top, exists_prop, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf]
exact ⟨x, m, rfl⟩
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries (x : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x)^[k] m ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Function.iterate_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ',
toEnd_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ih
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ (x y : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y)^[k] m ∈
lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hk : 2 * k.succ = (2 * k + 1) + 1 := rfl
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ', hk,
toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ?_
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top y) ih
variable {R L M}
theorem map_lowerCentralSeries_le (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [lowerCentralSeries_zero, le_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih
lemma map_lowerCentralSeries_eq {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f = lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
apply le_antisymm (map_lowerCentralSeries_le k f)
induction k with
| zero =>
rwa [lowerCentralSeries_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, top_le_iff, f.map_top,
f.range_eq_top]
| succ =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
apply LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
assumption
end
open LieAlgebra
theorem derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries (k : ℕ) :
derivedSeries R L k ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L L k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero]
| succ k h =>
have h' : derivedSeries R L k ≤ ⊤ := by simp only [le_top]
rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie h' h
/-- A Lie module is nilpotent if its lower central series reaches 0 (in a finite number of
steps). -/
@[mk_iff isNilpotent_iff_int]
class IsNilpotent : Prop where
mk_int ::
nilpotent_int : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- See also `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top`. -/
lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent L M ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [isNilpotent_iff_int, SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
lemma IsNilpotent.nilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mp ‹_›
variable {R L} in
lemma IsNilpotent.mk {k : ℕ} (h : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥) : IsNilpotent L M :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mpr ⟨k, h⟩
@[deprecated IsNilpotent.nilpotent (since := "2025-01-07")]
theorem exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
@[simp] lemma iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact iInf_le _ _
end
section
variable {R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem _root_.LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L N ↔ ∃ k, N.lcs k = ⊥ := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L N]
refine exists_congr fun k => ?_
rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap k, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot,
inf_eq_right.mpr (N.lcs_le_self k)]
variable (R L M)
instance (priority := 100) trivialIsNilpotent [IsTrivial L M] : IsNilpotent L M :=
⟨by use 1; simp⟩
instance instIsNilpotentSup (M₁ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) [IsNilpotent L M₁] [IsNilpotent L M₂] :
IsNilpotent L (M₁ ⊔ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₁
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₂
let lcs_eq_bot {m n} (N : LieSubmodule R L M) (le : m ≤ n) (hn : lowerCentralSeries R L N m = ⊥) :
lowerCentralSeries R L N n = ⊥ := by
simpa [hn] using antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L N le
have h₁ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₁ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₁ (Nat.le_max_left k l) hk
have h₂ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₂ (Nat.le_max_right k l) hl
refine (isNilpotent_iff R L (M₁ + M₂)).mpr ⟨k ⊔ l, ?_⟩
simp [LieSubmodule.add_eq_sup, (M₁ ⊔ M₂).lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.lcs_sup,
(M₁.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₁,
(M₂.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₂, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot]
theorem exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k : ℕ, ∀ x : L, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
use k
intro x; ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @LieSubmodule.mem_bot R L M, ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R L M x m k
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x) := by
change ∃ k, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0
have := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
tauto
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ [IsNilpotent L M] (x y : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y) := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
replace hM : lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hM]; exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (by omega)
use k
ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← LieSubmodule.mem_bot (R := R) (L := L), ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ R L M x y m k
@[simp] lemma maxGenEigenSpace_toEnd_eq_top [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
((toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace 0) = ⊤ := by
ext m
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul, sub_zero, Submodule.mem_top,
iff_true]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
exact ⟨k, by simp [hk x]⟩
/-- If the quotient of a Lie module `M` by a Lie submodule on which the Lie algebra acts trivially
is nilpotent then `M` is nilpotent.
This is essentially the Lie module equivalent of the fact that a central
extension of nilpotent Lie algebras is nilpotent. See `LieAlgebra.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient`
below for the corresponding result for Lie algebras. -/
theorem nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient {N : LieSubmodule R L M} (h₁ : N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M)
(h₂ : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) : IsNilpotent L M := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L] at h₂ ⊢
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
use k + 1
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
suffices lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N by
replace this := LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (le_trans this h₁)
rwa [ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, ← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact map_lowerCentralSeries_le k (LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' N)
theorem isNilpotent_quotient_iff :
IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N) ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L]
refine exists_congr fun k ↦ ?_
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, map_lowerCentralSeries_eq k
(LieSubmodule.Quotient.surjective_mk' N)]
theorem iInf_lcs_le_of_isNilpotent_quot (h : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (isNilpotent_quotient_iff R L M N).mp h
exact iInf_le_of_le k hk
end
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series `M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is
the natural number `k` (the number of inclusions).
For a non-nilpotent module, we use the junk value 0. -/
noncomputable def nilpotencyLength : ℕ :=
sInf {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff [IsNilpotent L M] :
nilpotencyLength L M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M := by
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
have hs : s.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent ℤ L M
exact ⟨k, hk⟩
change sInf s = 0 ↔ _
rw [← LieSubmodule.subsingleton_iff ℤ L M, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ←
lowerCentralSeries_zero, @eq_comm (LieSubmodule ℤ L M)]
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ Nat.sInf_mem hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
exact Or.inl h
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff (k : ℕ) :
nilpotencyLength L M = k + 1 ↔
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⊥ ∧ lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≠ ⊥ := by
have aux (k : ℕ) : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ ↔ lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
rw [aux, ne_eq, aux]
change sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s
have hs : ∀ k₁ k₂, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s := by
rintro k₁ k₂ h₁₂ (h₁ : lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k₁ = ⊥)
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (h₁ ▸ antitone_lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M h₁₂)
exact Nat.sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff hs k
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff [Nontrivial M] :
nilpotencyLength L M = 1 ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff ℤ, ← trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot]
simp
theorem isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one [IsNilpotent L M] (h : nilpotencyLength L M ≤ 1) :
IsTrivial L M := by
nontriviality M
rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.mp h with h | h
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff] at h; infer_instance
· rwa [nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff] at h
end
/-- Given a non-trivial nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series
`M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is the `k-1`th term in the lower central series (the last
non-trivial term).
For a trivial or non-nilpotent module, this is the bottom submodule, `⊥`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCentralSeriesLast : LieSubmodule R L M :=
match nilpotencyLength L M with
| 0 => ⊥
| k + 1 => lowerCentralSeries R L M k
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv [LieModule R L M] :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
rcases h : nilpotencyLength L M with - | k
· exact bot_le
· rw [le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot]
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff R, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at h
exact h.1
theorem nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast [LieModule R L M] [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent L M] :
Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) := by
rw [LieSubmodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, lowerCentralSeriesLast]
cases h : nilpotencyLength L M
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton] at h
contradiction
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff R] at h
exact h.2
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial [IsNilpotent L M] (h : ¬ IsTrivial L M) :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
replace h : 1 < nilpotencyLength L M := by
by_contra contra
have := isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one L M (not_lt.mp contra)
contradiction
rcases hk : nilpotencyLength L M with - | k <;> rw [hk] at h
· contradiction
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries _ _ _ (Nat.lt_succ.mp h)
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- For a nilpotent Lie module `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, the first term in the lower central series
of `M` contains a non-zero element on which `L` acts trivially unless the entire action is trivial.
Taking `M = L`, this provides a useful characterisation of Abelian-ness for nilpotent Lie
algebras. -/
lemma disjoint_lowerCentralSeries_maxTrivSubmodule_iff [IsNilpotent L M] :
Disjoint (lowerCentralSeries R L M 1) (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp⟩
nontriviality M
by_contra contra
have : lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 ⊓ maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
le_inf_iff.mpr ⟨lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial R L M contra,
lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M⟩
suffices ¬ Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) by
exact this (nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
rw [h.eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
exact this ▸ not_nontrivial _
theorem nontrivial_max_triv_of_isNilpotent [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent L M] :
Nontrivial (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) :=
Set.nontrivial_mono (lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M)
(nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
@[simp]
theorem coe_lcs_range_toEnd_eq (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k : Submodule R M) =
lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', ←
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k).mem_toSubmodule, ih]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨-, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact
⟨⟨toEnd R L M x, LieHom.mem_range_self _ x⟩, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isNilpotent_range_toEnd_iff :
IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M).range M ↔ IsNilpotent L M := by
simp only [isNilpotent_iff R _ M]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ <;> use k <;>
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj] at hk ⊢ <;>
simpa using hk
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- The upper (aka ascending) central series.
See also `LieSubmodule.lcs`. -/
def ucs (k : ℕ) : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
normalizer^[k]
| @[simp]
theorem ucs_zero : N.ucs 0 = N :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 543 | 545 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.IsFreeGroup
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# The coproduct (a.k.a. the free product) of groups or monoids
Given an `ι`-indexed family `M` of monoids,
we define their coproduct (a.k.a. free product) `Monoid.CoprodI M`.
As usual, we use the suffix `I` for an indexed (co)product,
leaving `Coprod` for the coproduct of two monoids.
When `ι` and all `M i` have decidable equality,
the free product bijects with the type `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` of reduced words.
This bijection is constructed
by defining an action of `Monoid.CoprodI M` on `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
When `M i` are all groups, `Monoid.CoprodI M` is also a group
(and the coproduct in the category of groups).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.CoprodI M`: the free product, defined as a quotient of a free monoid.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.of {i} : M i →* Monoid.CoprodI M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift : (∀ {i}, M i →* N) ≃ (Monoid.CoprodI M →* N)`: the universal property.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`: the type of reduced words.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word.equiv M : Monoid.CoprodI M ≃ word M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.NeWord M i j`: an inductive description of non-empty words
with first letter from `M i` and last letter from `M j`,
together with an API (`singleton`, `append`, `head`, `tail`, `to_word`, `Prod`, `inv`).
Used in the proof of the Ping-Pong-lemma.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift_injective_of_ping_pong`: The Ping-Pong-lemma,
proving injectivity of the `lift`. See the documentation of that theorem for more information.
## Remarks
There are many answers to the question "what is the coproduct of a family `M` of monoids?",
and they are all equivalent but not obviously equivalent.
We provide two answers.
The first, almost tautological answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI M`,
which is a quotient of the type of words in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`.
It's straightforward to define and easy to prove its universal property.
But this answer is not completely satisfactory,
because it's difficult to tell when two elements `x y : Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct
since `Monoid.CoprodI M` is defined as a quotient.
The second, maximally efficient answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
An element of `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` is a word in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
where the letter `⟨i, 1⟩` doesn't occur and no adjacent letters share an index `i`.
Since we only work with reduced words, there is no need for quotienting,
and it is easy to tell when two elements are distinct.
However it's not obvious that this is even a monoid!
We prove that every element of `Monoid.CoprodI M` can be represented by a unique reduced word,
i.e. `Monoid.CoprodI M` and `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` are equivalent types.
This means that `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` can be given a monoid structure,
and it lets us tell when two elements of `Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct.
There is also a completely tautological, maximally inefficient answer
given by `MonCat.Colimits.ColimitType`.
Whereas `Monoid.CoprodI M` at least ensures that
(any instance of) associativity holds by reflexivity,
in this answer associativity holds because of quotienting.
Yet another answer, which is constructively more satisfying,
could be obtained by showing that `Monoid.CoprodI.Rel` is confluent.
## References
[van der Waerden, *Free products of groups*][MR25465]
-/
open Set
variable {ι : Type*} (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Monoid (M i)]
/-- A relation on the free monoid on alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
relating `⟨i, 1⟩` with `1` and `⟨i, x⟩ * ⟨i, y⟩` with `⟨i, x * y⟩`. -/
inductive Monoid.CoprodI.Rel : FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → Prop
| of_one (i : ι) : Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, 1⟩) 1
| of_mul {i : ι} (x y : M i) :
Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x⟩ * FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, y⟩) (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x * y⟩)
/-- The free product (categorical coproduct) of an indexed family of monoids. -/
def Monoid.CoprodI : Type _ := (conGen (Monoid.CoprodI.Rel M)).Quotient
-- The `Monoid` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Monoid (Monoid.CoprodI M) := by
delta Monoid.CoprodI; infer_instance
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.CoprodI M) :=
⟨1⟩
namespace Monoid.CoprodI
/-- The type of reduced words. A reduced word cannot contain a letter `1`, and no two adjacent
letters can come from the same summand. -/
@[ext]
structure Word where
/-- A `Word` is a `List (Σ i, M i)`, such that `1` is not in the list, and no
two adjacent letters are from the same summand -/
toList : List (Σi, M i)
/-- A reduced word does not contain `1` -/
ne_one : ∀ l ∈ toList, Sigma.snd l ≠ 1
/-- Adjacent letters are not from the same summand. -/
chain_ne : toList.Chain' fun l l' => Sigma.fst l ≠ Sigma.fst l'
variable {M}
/-- The inclusion of a summand into the free product. -/
def of {i : ι} : M i →* CoprodI M where
toFun x := Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i x)
map_one' := (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_one i))
map_mul' x y := Eq.symm <| (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_mul x y))
theorem of_apply {i} (m : M i) : of m = Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i m) :=
rfl
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
-- Porting note: higher `ext` priority
@[ext 1100]
theorem ext_hom (f g : CoprodI M →* N) (h : ∀ i, f.comp (of : M i →* _) = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
FreeMonoid.hom_eq fun ⟨i, x⟩ => by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← of_apply]
unfold CoprodI
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h]
/-- A map out of the free product corresponds to a family of maps out of the summands. This is the
universal property of the free product, characterizing it as a categorical coproduct. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift : (∀ i, M i →* N) ≃ (CoprodI M →* N) where
toFun fi :=
Con.lift _ (FreeMonoid.lift fun p : Σi, M i => fi p.fst p.snd) <|
Con.conGen_le <| by
simp_rw [Con.ker_rel]
rintro _ _ (i | ⟨x, y⟩) <;> simp
invFun f _ := f.comp of
left_inv := by
intro fi
ext i x
rfl
right_inv := by
intro f
ext i x
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) i : (lift fi).comp of = fi i :=
congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_apply fi) i
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) {i} (m : M i) : lift fi (of m) = fi i m :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_of ..) m
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of' {N} [Monoid N] (f : CoprodI M →* N) :
lift (fun i ↦ f.comp (of (i := i))) = f :=
lift.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem lift_of' : lift (fun i ↦ (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = .id (CoprodI M) :=
lift_comp_of' (.id _)
theorem of_leftInverse [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Function.LeftInverse (lift <| Pi.mulSingle i (MonoidHom.id (M i))) of := fun x => by
simp only [lift_of, Pi.mulSingle_eq_same, MonoidHom.id_apply]
theorem of_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (of : M i →* _) := by
classical exact (of_leftInverse i).injective
theorem mrange_eq_iSup {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) = ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) := by
rw [lift, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Con.lift_range, FreeMonoid.mrange_lift,
range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
simp only [MonoidHom.mclosure_range]
theorem lift_mrange_le {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) {s : Submonoid N} :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) ≤ s ↔ ∀ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) ≤ s := by
simp [mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mrange_of : ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (of : M i →* CoprodI M) = ⊤ := by
simp [← mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem mclosure_iUnion_range_of :
Submonoid.closure (⋃ i, Set.range (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = ⊤ := by
simp [Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_left {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(mul : ∀ {i} (m : M i) x, motive x → motive (of m * x)) : motive m := by
induction m using Submonoid.induction_of_closure_eq_top_left mclosure_iUnion_range_of with
| one => exact one
| mul x hx y ihy =>
obtain ⟨i, m, rfl⟩ : ∃ (i : ι) (m : M i), of m = x := by simpa using hx
exact mul m y ihy
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(of : ∀ (i) (m : M i), motive (of m))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive m := by
induction m using CoprodI.induction_left with
| one => exact one
| mul m x hx => exact mul _ _ (of _ _) hx
section Group
variable (G : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Group (G i)]
instance : Inv (CoprodI G) where
inv :=
MulOpposite.unop ∘ lift fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom
theorem inv_def (x : CoprodI G) :
x⁻¹ =
MulOpposite.unop
(lift (fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom) x) :=
rfl
instance : Group (CoprodI G) :=
{ inv_mul_cancel := by
intro m
rw [inv_def]
induction m using CoprodI.induction_on with
| one => rw [MonoidHom.map_one, MulOpposite.unop_one, one_mul]
| of m ih =>
change of _⁻¹ * of _ = 1
rw [← of.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel, of.map_one]
| mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [MonoidHom.map_mul, MulOpposite.unop_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc _ x y, ihx, one_mul,
ihy] }
theorem lift_range_le {N} [Group N] (f : ∀ i, G i →* N) {s : Subgroup N}
(h : ∀ i, (f i).range ≤ s) : (lift f).range ≤ s := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using CoprodI.induction_on with
| one => exact s.one_mem
| of i x =>
simp only [lift_of, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact h i (Set.mem_range_self x)
| mul x y hx hy =>
simp only [map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact s.mul_mem hx hy
theorem range_eq_iSup {N} [Group N] (f : ∀ i, G i →* N) : (lift f).range = ⨆ i, (f i).range := by
apply le_antisymm (lift_range_le _ f fun i => le_iSup (fun i => MonoidHom.range (f i)) i)
apply iSup_le _
rintro i _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨of x, by simp only [lift_of]⟩
end Group
namespace Word
/-- The empty reduced word. -/
@[simps]
def empty : Word M where
toList := []
ne_one := by simp
chain_ne := List.chain'_nil
instance : Inhabited (Word M) :=
⟨empty⟩
/-- A reduced word determines an element of the free product, given by multiplication. -/
def prod (w : Word M) : CoprodI M :=
List.prod (w.toList.map fun l => of l.snd)
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : prod (empty : Word M) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- `fstIdx w` is `some i` if the first letter of `w` is `⟨i, m⟩` with `m : M i`. If `w` is empty
then it's `none`. -/
def fstIdx (w : Word M) : Option ι :=
w.toList.head?.map Sigma.fst
theorem fstIdx_ne_iff {w : Word M} {i} :
fstIdx w ≠ some i ↔ ∀ l ∈ w.toList.head?, i ≠ Sigma.fst l :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by simp [fstIdx]
variable (M)
/-- Given an index `i : ι`, `Pair M i` is the type of pairs `(head, tail)` where `head : M i` and
`tail : Word M`, subject to the constraint that first letter of `tail` can't be `⟨i, m⟩`.
By prepending `head` to `tail`, one obtains a new word. We'll show that any word can be uniquely
obtained in this way. -/
@[ext]
structure Pair (i : ι) where
/-- An element of `M i`, the first letter of the word. -/
head : M i
/-- The remaining letters of the word, excluding the first letter -/
tail : Word M
/-- The index first letter of tail of a `Pair M i` is not equal to `i` -/
fstIdx_ne : fstIdx tail ≠ some i
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair M i) :=
⟨⟨1, empty, by tauto⟩⟩
variable {M}
/-- Construct a new `Word` without any reduction. The underlying list of
`cons m w _ _` is `⟨_, m⟩::w` -/
@[simps]
def cons {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) (h1 : m ≠ 1) : Word M :=
{ toList := ⟨i, m⟩ :: w.toList,
ne_one := by
simp only [List.mem_cons]
rintro l (rfl | hl)
· exact h1
· exact w.ne_one l hl
chain_ne := w.chain_ne.cons' (fstIdx_ne_iff.mp hmw) }
@[simp]
theorem fstIdx_cons {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) (h1 : m ≠ 1) :
fstIdx (cons m w hmw h1) = some i := by simp [cons, fstIdx]
@[simp]
theorem prod_cons (i) (m : M i) (w : Word M) (h1 : m ≠ 1) (h2 : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) :
prod (cons m w h2 h1) = of m * prod w := by
simp [cons, prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
section
variable [∀ i, DecidableEq (M i)]
/-- Given a pair `(head, tail)`, we can form a word by prepending `head` to `tail`, except if `head`
is `1 : M i` then we have to just return `Word` since we need the result to be reduced. -/
def rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : Word M :=
if h : p.head = 1 then p.tail
else cons p.head p.tail p.fstIdx_ne h
@[simp]
theorem prod_rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : prod (rcons p) = of p.head * prod p.tail :=
if hm : p.head = 1 then by rw [rcons, dif_pos hm, hm, MonoidHom.map_one, one_mul]
else by rw [rcons, dif_neg hm, cons, prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, prod]
theorem rcons_inj {i} : Function.Injective (rcons : Pair M i → Word M) := by
rintro ⟨m, w, h⟩ ⟨m', w', h'⟩ he
by_cases hm : m = 1 <;> by_cases hm' : m' = 1
· simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_pos hm'] at he
aesop
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_neg hm'] at he
rw [he] at h
exact h rfl
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm', dif_neg hm] at he
rw [← he] at h'
exact h' rfl
· have : m = m' ∧ w.toList = w'.toList := by
simpa [cons, rcons, dif_neg hm, dif_neg hm', eq_self_iff_true, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
heq_iff_eq, ← Subtype.ext_iff_val] using he
rcases this with ⟨rfl, h⟩
congr
exact Word.ext h
theorem mem_rcons_iff {i j : ι} (p : Pair M i) (m : M j) :
⟨_, m⟩ ∈ (rcons p).toList ↔ ⟨_, m⟩ ∈ p.tail.toList ∨
m ≠ 1 ∧ (∃ h : i = j, m = h ▸ p.head) := by
simp only [rcons, cons, ne_eq]
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst i
by_cases hm : m = p.head
· subst m
split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all [Ne.symm hij]
end
/-- Induct on a word by adding letters one at a time without reduction,
effectively inducting on the underlying `List`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consRecOn {motive : Word M → Sort*} (w : Word M) (empty : motive empty)
(cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
motive w := by
rcases w with ⟨w, h1, h2⟩
induction w with
| nil => exact empty
| cons m w ih =>
refine cons m.1 m.2 ⟨w, fun _ hl => h1 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hl), h2.tail⟩ ?_ ?_ (ih _ _)
· rw [List.chain'_cons'] at h2
simp only [fstIdx, ne_eq, Option.map_eq_some_iff,
Sigma.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_exists]
intro m' hm'
exact h2.1 _ hm' rfl
· exact h1 _ List.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_empty {motive : Word M → Sort*} (h_empty : motive empty)
(h_cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn empty h_empty h_cons = h_empty := rfl
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_cons {motive : Word M → Sort*} (i) (m : M i) (w : Word M) h1 h2
(h_empty : motive empty)
(h_cons : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w) h1 h2, motive w → motive (cons m w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn (cons m w h1 h2) h_empty h_cons = h_cons i m w h1 h2
(consRecOn w h_empty h_cons) := rfl
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (M i)]
-- This definition is computable but not very nice to look at. Thankfully we don't have to inspect
-- it, since `rcons` is known to be injective.
/-- Given `i : ι`, any reduced word can be decomposed into a pair `p` such that `w = rcons p`. -/
private def equivPairAux (i) (w : Word M) : { p : Pair M i // rcons p = w } :=
consRecOn w ⟨⟨1, .empty, by simp [fstIdx, empty]⟩, by simp [rcons]⟩ <|
fun j m w h1 h2 _ =>
if ij : i = j then
{ val :=
{ head := ij ▸ m
tail := w
fstIdx_ne := ij ▸ h1 }
property := by subst ij; simp [rcons, h2] }
else ⟨⟨1, cons m w h1 h2, by simp [cons, fstIdx, Ne.symm ij]⟩, by simp [rcons]⟩
/-- The equivalence between words and pairs. Given a word, it decomposes it as a pair by removing
the first letter if it comes from `M i`. Given a pair, it prepends the head to the tail. -/
def equivPair (i) : Word M ≃ Pair M i where
toFun w := (equivPairAux i w).val
invFun := rcons
left_inv w := (equivPairAux i w).property
right_inv _ := rcons_inj (equivPairAux i _).property
theorem equivPair_symm (i) (p : Pair M i) : (equivPair i).symm p = rcons p :=
rfl
theorem equivPair_eq_of_fstIdx_ne {i} {w : Word M} (h : fstIdx w ≠ some i) :
equivPair i w = ⟨1, w, h⟩ :=
(equivPair i).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.mpr <| Eq.symm (dif_pos rfl)
theorem mem_equivPair_tail_iff {i j : ι} {w : Word M} (m : M i) :
(⟨i, m⟩ ∈ (equivPair j w).tail.toList) ↔ ⟨i, m⟩ ∈ w.toList.tail
∨ i ≠ j ∧ ∃ h : w.toList ≠ [], w.toList.head h = ⟨i, m⟩ := by
simp only [equivPair, equivPairAux, ne_eq, Equiv.coe_fn_mk]
induction w using consRecOn with
| empty => simp
| cons k g tail h1 h2 ih =>
simp only [consRecOn_cons]
split_ifs with h
· subst k
by_cases hij : j = i <;> simp_all
· by_cases hik : i = k
· subst i; simp_all [@eq_comm _ m g, @eq_comm _ k j, or_comm]
· simp [hik, Ne.symm hik]
theorem mem_of_mem_equivPair_tail {i j : ι} {w : Word M} (m : M i) :
(⟨i, m⟩ ∈ (equivPair j w).tail.toList) → ⟨i, m⟩ ∈ w.toList := by
rw [mem_equivPair_tail_iff]
rintro (h | h)
· exact List.mem_of_mem_tail h
· revert h; cases w.toList <;> simp +contextual
theorem equivPair_head {i : ι} {w : Word M} :
(equivPair i w).head =
if h : ∃ (h : w.toList ≠ []), (w.toList.head h).1 = i
then h.snd ▸ (w.toList.head h.1).2
else 1 := by
simp only [equivPair, equivPairAux]
induction w using consRecOn with
| empty => simp
| cons head =>
by_cases hi : i = head
· subst hi; simp
· simp [hi, Ne.symm hi]
instance summandAction (i) : MulAction (M i) (Word M) where
smul m w := rcons { equivPair i w with head := m * (equivPair i w).head }
one_smul w := by
apply (equivPair i).symm_apply_eq.mpr
simp [equivPair]
mul_smul m m' w := by
dsimp [instHSMul]
simp [mul_assoc, ← equivPair_symm, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
instance : MulAction (CoprodI M) (Word M) :=
MulAction.ofEndHom (lift fun _ => MulAction.toEndHom)
theorem smul_def {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) :
m • w = rcons { equivPair i w with head := m * (equivPair i w).head } :=
rfl
theorem of_smul_def (i) (w : Word M) (m : M i) :
of m • w = rcons { equivPair i w with head := m * (equivPair i w).head } :=
rfl
theorem equivPair_smul_same {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) :
equivPair i (of m • w) = ⟨m * (equivPair i w).head, (equivPair i w).tail,
(equivPair i w).fstIdx_ne⟩ := by
rw [of_smul_def, ← equivPair_symm]
simp
@[simp]
theorem equivPair_tail {i} (p : Pair M i) :
equivPair i p.tail = ⟨1, p.tail, p.fstIdx_ne⟩ :=
equivPair_eq_of_fstIdx_ne _
theorem smul_eq_of_smul {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) :
m • w = of m • w := rfl
theorem mem_smul_iff {i j : ι} {m₁ : M i} {m₂ : M j} {w : Word M} :
⟨_, m₁⟩ ∈ (of m₂ • w).toList ↔
(¬i = j ∧ ⟨i, m₁⟩ ∈ w.toList)
∨ (m₁ ≠ 1 ∧ ∃ (hij : i = j),(⟨i, m₁⟩ ∈ w.toList.tail) ∨
(∃ m', ⟨j, m'⟩ ∈ w.toList.head? ∧ m₁ = hij ▸ (m₂ * m')) ∨
(w.fstIdx ≠ some j ∧ m₁ = hij ▸ m₂)) := by
rw [of_smul_def, mem_rcons_iff, mem_equivPair_tail_iff, equivPair_head, or_assoc]
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst i
simp only [not_true, ne_eq, false_and, exists_prop, true_and, false_or]
by_cases hw : ⟨j, m₁⟩ ∈ w.toList.tail
· simp [hw, show m₁ ≠ 1 from w.ne_one _ (List.mem_of_mem_tail hw)]
· simp only [hw, false_or, Option.mem_def, ne_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hm1
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with ⟨hnil, rfl⟩
simp only [List.head?_eq_head hnil, Option.some.injEq, ne_eq]
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨_, h, rfl⟩ | hm')
· simp only [Sigma.ext_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and] at h
subst h
rfl
· simp only [fstIdx, Option.map_eq_some_iff, Sigma.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_exists, ne_eq] at hm'
exact (hm'.1 (w.toList.head hnil).2 (by rw [List.head?_eq_head])).elim
· revert h
rw [fstIdx]
cases w.toList
· simp
· simp +contextual [Sigma.ext_iff]
· rcases w with ⟨_ | _, _, _⟩ <;>
simp [or_comm, hij, Ne.symm hij]; rw [eq_comm]
|
theorem mem_smul_iff_of_ne {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) {m₁ : M i} {m₂ : M j} {w : Word M} :
⟨_, m₁⟩ ∈ (of m₂ • w).toList ↔ ⟨i, m₁⟩ ∈ w.toList := by
simp [mem_smul_iff, *]
theorem cons_eq_smul {i} {m : M i} {ls h1 h2} :
cons m ls h1 h2 = of m • ls := by
rw [of_smul_def, equivPair_eq_of_fstIdx_ne _]
· simp [cons, rcons, h2]
· exact h1
theorem rcons_eq_smul {i} (p : Pair M i) :
rcons p = of p.head • p.tail := by
simp [of_smul_def]
@[simp]
theorem equivPair_head_smul_equivPair_tail {i : ι} (w : Word M) :
of (equivPair i w).head • (equivPair i w).tail = w := by
rw [← rcons_eq_smul, ← equivPair_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)]
[∀ i, DecidableEq (G i)] {i} (w : Word G) :
(equivPair i w).tail = (of (equivPair i w).head)⁻¹ • w :=
Eq.symm <| inv_smul_eq_iff.2 (equivPair_head_smul_equivPair_tail w).symm
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction {motive : Word M → Prop} (empty : motive empty)
(smul : ∀ (i) (m : M i) (w), motive w → motive (of m • w)) (w : Word M) : motive w := by
induction w using consRecOn with
| empty => exact empty
| cons _ _ _ _ _ ih =>
rw [cons_eq_smul]
exact smul _ _ _ ih
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CoprodI.lean | 549 | 582 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Star-convex sets
This files defines star-convex sets (aka star domains, star-shaped set, radially convex set).
A set is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in the set is contained in the set.
This is the prototypical example of a contractible set in homotopy theory (by scaling every point
towards `x`), but has wider uses.
Note that this has nothing to do with star rings, `Star` and co.
## Main declarations
* `StarConvex 𝕜 x s`: `s` is star-convex at `x` with scalars `𝕜`.
## Implementation notes
Instead of saying that a set is star-convex, we say a set is star-convex *at a point*. This has the
advantage of allowing us to talk about convexity as being "everywhere star-convexity" and of making
the union of star-convex sets be star-convex.
Incidentally, this choice means we don't need to assume a set is nonempty for it to be star-convex.
Concretely, the empty set is star-convex at every point.
## TODO
Balanced sets are star-convex.
The closure of a star-convex set is star-convex.
Star-convex sets are contractible.
A nonempty open star-convex set in `ℝ^n` is diffeomorphic to the entire space.
-/
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (x : E) (s : Set E)
/-- Star-convexity of sets. `s` is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in `s` is
contained in `s`. -/
def StarConvex (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] (x : E) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s
variable {𝕜 x s} {t : Set E}
theorem starConvex_iff_segment_subset : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro h y hy z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h hy ha hb hab
· rintro h y hy a b ha hb hab
exact h hy ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
theorem StarConvex.segment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) : [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hy
theorem StarConvex.openSegment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hy)
/-- Alternative definition of star-convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
theorem starConvex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • {x} + b • s ⊆ s := by
refine
⟨?_, fun h y hy a b ha hb hab =>
h ha hb hab (add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set <| mem_singleton _) ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, rfl : u = x, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hv ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_empty (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x ∅ := fun _ hy => hy.elim
theorem starConvex_univ (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x univ := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => trivial
theorem StarConvex.inter (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => ⟨hs hy.left ha hb hab, ht hy.right ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab s hs => h s hs (hy s hs) ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ starConvex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem starConvex_iInter₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iInter fun i => starConvex_iInter (h i)
theorem StarConvex.union (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∪ t) := by
rintro y (hy | hy) a b ha hb hab
· exact Or.inl (hs hy ha hb hab)
· exact Or.inr (ht hy ha hb hab)
theorem starConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hs : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hy⟩ := hy
exact ⟨i, hs i hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_iUnion₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iUnion fun i => starConvex_iUnion (h i)
theorem starConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact starConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
theorem StarConvex.prod {y : F} {s : Set E} {t : Set F} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s)
(ht : StarConvex 𝕜 y t) : StarConvex 𝕜 (x, y) (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
⟨hs hy.1 ha hb hab, ht hy.2 ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (E i)] [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)]
{x : ∀ i, E i} {s : Set ι} {t : ∀ i, Set (E i)} (ht : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → StarConvex 𝕜 (x i) (t i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s.pi t) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab i hi => ht hi (hy i hi) ha hb hab
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {x y z : E} {s : Set E}
theorem StarConvex.mem [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h
convert hs hy zero_le_one le_rfl (add_zero 1)
rw [one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
theorem starConvex_iff_forall_pos (hx : x ∈ s) : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔
∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h y hy a b ha hb hab => h hy ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
intro h y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
rwa [hab, one_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
obtain rfl | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
rwa [hab, one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
exact h hy ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_iff_forall_ne_pos (hx : x ∈ s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔
∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hy ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
intro h y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
rwa [hab, zero_smul, one_smul, zero_add]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
rwa [hab, zero_smul, one_smul, add_zero]
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rwa [Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hy hxy ha' hb' hab
theorem starConvex_iff_openSegment_subset [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hx : x ∈ s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.trans <|
forall₂_congr fun _ hy => (openSegment_subset_iff_segment_subset hx hy).symm
theorem starConvex_singleton (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x {x} := by
rintro y (rfl : y = x) a b _ _ hab
exact Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem StarConvex.linear_image (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
exact ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hy ha hb hab, by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StarConvex.is_linear_image (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image <| hf.mk' f
theorem StarConvex.linear_preimage {s : Set F} (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]
exact hs hy ha hb hab
theorem StarConvex.is_linear_preimage {s : Set F} {f : E → F} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) s)
(hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (preimage f s) :=
hs.linear_preimage <| hf.mk' f
theorem StarConvex.add {t : Set E} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 y t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (x + y) (s + t) := by
rw [← add_image_prod]
exact (hs.prod ht).is_linear_image IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_add
theorem StarConvex.add_left (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (z : E) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (z + x) ((fun x => z + x) '' s) := by
intro y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩ := hy
refine ⟨a • x + b • y', hs hy' ha hb hab, ?_⟩
match_scalars <;> simp [hab]
theorem StarConvex.add_right (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (z : E) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (x + z) ((fun x => x + z) '' s) := by
intro y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩ := hy
refine ⟨a • x + b • y', hs hy' ha hb hab, ?_⟩
match_scalars <;> simp [hab]
/-- The translation of a star-convex set is also star-convex. -/
theorem StarConvex.preimage_add_right (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (z + x) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x ((fun x => z + x) ⁻¹' s) := by
intro y hy a b ha hb hab
have h := hs hy ha hb hab
rwa [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, ← add_smul, hab, one_smul] at h
/-- The translation of a star-convex set is also star-convex. -/
theorem StarConvex.preimage_add_left (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (x + z) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x ((fun x => x + z) ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [add_comm] at hs
simpa only [add_comm] using hs.preimage_add_right
end Module
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {x y : E}
theorem StarConvex.sub' {s : Set (E × E)} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (x, y) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (x - y) ((fun x : E × E => x.1 - x.2) '' s) :=
hs.is_linear_image IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_sub
end AddCommGroup
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {x : E} {s : Set E}
theorem StarConvex.smul (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (c : 𝕜) : StarConvex 𝕜 (c • x) (c • s) :=
hs.linear_image <| LinearMap.lsmul _ _ c
theorem StarConvex.zero_smul (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 0 s) (c : 𝕜) : StarConvex 𝕜 0 (c • s) := by
simpa using hs.smul c
theorem StarConvex.preimage_smul {c : 𝕜} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (c • x) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x ((fun z => c • z) ⁻¹' s) :=
hs.linear_preimage (LinearMap.lsmul _ _ c)
theorem StarConvex.affinity (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (z : E) (c : 𝕜) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (z + c • x) ((fun x => z + c • x) '' s) := by
have h := (hs.smul c).add_left z
rwa [← image_smul, image_image] at h
end AddCommMonoid
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddRightMono 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [SMulWithZero 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
theorem starConvex_zero_iff :
StarConvex 𝕜 0 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → a ≤ 1 → a • x ∈ s := by
refine
forall_congr' fun x => forall_congr' fun _ => ⟨fun h a ha₀ ha₁ => ?_, fun h a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
· simpa only [sub_add_cancel, eq_self_iff_true, forall_true_left, zero_add, smul_zero] using
h (sub_nonneg_of_le ha₁) ha₀
· rw [smul_zero, zero_add]
exact h hb (by rw [← hab]; exact le_add_of_nonneg_left ha)
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
section AddRightMono
variable [AddRightMono 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
{x y : E} {s t : Set E}
theorem StarConvex.add_smul_mem (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (hy : x + y ∈ s) {t : 𝕜} (ht₀ : 0 ≤ t)
(ht₁ : t ≤ 1) : x + t • y ∈ s := by
have h : x + t • y = (1 - t) • x + t • (x + y) := by
rw [smul_add, ← add_assoc, ← add_smul, sub_add_cancel, one_smul]
rw [h]
exact hs hy (sub_nonneg_of_le ht₁) ht₀ (sub_add_cancel _ _)
theorem StarConvex.smul_mem (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 0 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {t : 𝕜} (ht₀ : 0 ≤ t)
(ht₁ : t ≤ 1) : t • x ∈ s := by simpa using hs.add_smul_mem (by simpa using hx) ht₀ ht₁
theorem StarConvex.add_smul_sub_mem (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (hy : y ∈ s) {t : 𝕜} (ht₀ : 0 ≤ t)
(ht₁ : t ≤ 1) : x + t • (y - x) ∈ s := by
apply hs.segment_subset hy
rw [segment_eq_image']
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨ht₀, ht₁⟩
end AddRightMono
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
/-- The preimage of a star-convex set under an affine map is star-convex. -/
theorem StarConvex.affine_preimage (f : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set F} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_preimage, Convex.combo_affine_apply hab]
exact hs hy ha hb hab
/-- The image of a star-convex set under an affine map is star-convex. -/
theorem StarConvex.affine_image (f : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set E} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) (f '' s) := by
rintro y ⟨y', ⟨hy', hy'f⟩⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨a • x + b • y', ⟨hs hy' ha hb hab, ?_⟩⟩
rw [Convex.combo_affine_apply hab, hy'f]
theorem StarConvex.neg (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) : StarConvex 𝕜 (-x) (-s) := by
rw [← image_neg_eq_neg]
exact hs.is_linear_image IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_neg
theorem StarConvex.sub (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 y t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (x - y) (s - t) := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hs.add ht.neg
end AddCommGroup
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E]
{x y : E}
/-- If `x < y`, then `(Set.Iic x)ᶜ` is star convex at `y`. -/
lemma starConvex_compl_Iic (h : x < y) : StarConvex 𝕜 y (Iic x)ᶜ := by
refine (starConvex_iff_forall_pos <| by simp [h.not_le]).mpr fun z hz a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_
rw [mem_compl_iff, mem_Iic] at hz ⊢
contrapose! hz
refine (lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left ?_ hb.le).le
calc
b • z ≤ (a + b) • x - a • y := by rwa [le_sub_iff_add_le', hab, one_smul]
_ < b • x := by
rw [add_smul, sub_lt_iff_lt_add']
gcongr
/-- If `x < y`, then `(Set.Ici y)ᶜ` is star convex at `x`. -/
lemma starConvex_compl_Ici (h : x < y) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (Ici y)ᶜ :=
starConvex_compl_Iic (E := Eᵒᵈ) h
end OrderedAddCommGroup
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {x : E} {s : Set E}
/-- Alternative definition of star-convexity, using division. -/
theorem starConvex_iff_div : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s →
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b → (a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y ∈ s :=
⟨fun h y hy a b ha hb hab => by
apply h hy
· positivity
· positivity
· rw [← add_div]
exact div_self hab.ne',
fun h y hy a b ha hb hab => by
have h' := h hy ha hb
rw [hab, div_one, div_one] at h'
exact h' zero_lt_one⟩
theorem StarConvex.mem_smul (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 0 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {t : 𝕜} (ht : 1 ≤ t) :
x ∈ t • s := by
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (zero_lt_one.trans_le ht).ne']
exact hs.smul_mem hx (by positivity) (inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ ht)
end AddCommGroup
end LinearOrderedField
|
/-!
#### Star-convex sets in an ordered space
Relates `starConvex` and `Set.ordConnected`.
-/
section OrdConnected
/-- If `s` is an order-connected set in an ordered module over an ordered semiring
and all elements of `s` are comparable with `x ∈ s`, then `s` is `StarConvex` at `x`. -/
theorem Set.OrdConnected.starConvex [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Star.lean | 414 | 425 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Convergence
/-!
# Dirichlet convolution of sequences and products of L-series
We define the *Dirichlet convolution* `f ⍟ g` of two sequences `f g : ℕ → R` with values in a
semiring `R` by `(f ⍟ g) n = ∑ (k * m = n), f k * g m` when `n ≠ 0` and `(f ⍟ g) 0 = 0`.
Technically, this is done by transporting the existing definition for `ArithmeticFunction R`;
see `LSeries.convolution`. We show that these definitions agree (`LSeries.convolution_def`).
We then consider the case `R = ℂ` and show that `L (f ⍟ g) = L f * L g` on the common domain
of convergence of the L-series `L f` and `L g` of `f` and `g`; see `LSeries_convolution`
and `LSeries_convolution'`.
-/
open scoped LSeries.notation
open Complex LSeries
/-!
### Dirichlet convolution of two functions
-/
open Nat
/-- We turn any function `ℕ → R` into an `ArithmeticFunction R` by setting its value at `0`
to be zero. -/
def toArithmeticFunction {R : Type*} [Zero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun n := if n = 0 then 0 else f n
map_zero' := rfl
| lemma toArithmeticFunction_congr {R : Type*} [Zero R] {f f' : ℕ → R}
(h : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → f n = f' n) :
toArithmeticFunction f = toArithmeticFunction f' := by
ext
simp_all [toArithmeticFunction]
/-- If we consider an arithmetic function just as a function and turn it back into an
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Convolution.lean | 40 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Density
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Graph uniformity and uniform partitions
In this file we define uniformity of a pair of vertices in a graph and uniformity of a partition of
vertices of a graph. Both are also known as ε-regularity.
Finsets of vertices `s` and `t` are `ε`-uniform in a graph `G` if their edge density is at most
`ε`-far from the density of any big enough `s'` and `t'` where `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t`.
The definition is pretty technical, but it amounts to the edges between `s` and `t` being "random"
The literature contains several definitions which are equivalent up to scaling `ε` by some constant
when the partition is equitable.
A partition `P` of the vertices is `ε`-uniform if the proportion of non `ε`-uniform pairs of parts
is less than `ε`.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsUniform`: Graph uniformity of a pair of finsets of vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.nonuniformWitness`: `G.nonuniformWitness ε s t` and `G.nonuniformWitness ε t s`
together witness the non-uniformity of `s` and `t`.
* `Finpartition.nonUniforms`: Non uniform pairs of parts of a partition.
* `Finpartition.IsUniform`: Uniformity of a partition.
* `Finpartition.nonuniformWitnesses`: For each non-uniform pair of parts of a partition, pick
witnesses of non-uniformity and dump them all together.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset
variable {α 𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
/-! ### Graph uniformity -/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : 𝕜) {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- A pair of finsets of vertices is `ε`-uniform (aka `ε`-regular) iff their edge density is close
to the density of any big enough pair of subsets. Intuitively, the edges between them are
random-like. -/
def IsUniform (s t : Finset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s'⦄, s' ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃t'⦄, t' ⊆ t → (#s : 𝕜) * ε ≤ #s' →
(#t : 𝕜) * ε ≤ #t' → |(G.edgeDensity s' t' : 𝕜) - (G.edgeDensity s t : 𝕜)| < ε
variable {G ε}
instance IsUniform.instDecidableRel : DecidableRel (G.IsUniform ε) := by
unfold IsUniform; infer_instance
theorem IsUniform.mono {ε' : 𝕜} (h : ε ≤ ε') (hε : IsUniform G ε s t) : IsUniform G ε' s t :=
fun s' hs' t' ht' hs ht => by
refine (hε hs' ht' (le_trans ?_ hs) (le_trans ?_ ht)).trans_le h <;> gcongr
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem IsUniform.symm : Symmetric (IsUniform G ε) := fun s t h t' ht' s' hs' ht hs => by
rw [edgeDensity_comm _ t', edgeDensity_comm _ t]
exact h hs' ht' hs ht
variable (G)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem isUniform_comm : IsUniform G ε s t ↔ IsUniform G ε t s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm, fun h => h.symm⟩
lemma isUniform_one : G.IsUniform (1 : 𝕜) s t := by
intro s' hs' t' ht' hs ht
rw [mul_one] at hs ht
rw [eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs' (Nat.cast_le.1 hs),
| eq_of_subset_of_card_le ht' (Nat.cast_le.1 ht), sub_self, abs_zero]
exact zero_lt_one
variable {G}
lemma IsUniform.pos (hG : G.IsUniform ε s t) : 0 < ε :=
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Uniform.lean | 85 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 691 | 693 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Stevens. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Stevens, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Central binomial coefficients
This file proves properties of the central binomial coefficients (that is, `Nat.choose (2 * n) n`).
## Main definition and results
* `Nat.centralBinom`: the central binomial coefficient, `(2 * n).choose n`.
* `Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ`: the inductive relationship between successive central binomial
coefficients.
* `Nat.four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom`: an exponential lower bound on the central binomial
coefficient.
* `succ_dvd_centralBinom`: The result that `n+1 ∣ n.centralBinom`, ensuring that the explicit
definition of the Catalan numbers is integer-valued.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- The central binomial coefficient, `Nat.choose (2 * n) n`.
-/
def centralBinom (n : ℕ) :=
(2 * n).choose n
theorem centralBinom_eq_two_mul_choose (n : ℕ) : centralBinom n = (2 * n).choose n :=
rfl
theorem centralBinom_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < centralBinom n :=
choose_pos (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ zero_lt_two)
theorem centralBinom_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : centralBinom n ≠ 0 :=
(centralBinom_pos n).ne'
@[simp]
theorem centralBinom_zero : centralBinom 0 = 1 :=
choose_zero_right _
/-- The central binomial coefficient is the largest binomial coefficient.
-/
theorem choose_le_centralBinom (r n : ℕ) : choose (2 * n) r ≤ centralBinom n :=
calc
(2 * n).choose r ≤ (2 * n).choose (2 * n / 2) := choose_le_middle r (2 * n)
_ = (2 * n).choose n := by rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left n zero_lt_two]
theorem two_le_centralBinom (n : ℕ) (n_pos : 0 < n) : 2 ≤ centralBinom n :=
calc
2 ≤ 2 * n := Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ n_pos
_ = (2 * n).choose 1 := (choose_one_right (2 * n)).symm
_ ≤ centralBinom n := choose_le_centralBinom 1 n
/-- An inductive property of the central binomial coefficient.
-/
theorem succ_mul_centralBinom_succ (n : ℕ) :
(n + 1) * centralBinom (n + 1) = 2 * (2 * n + 1) * centralBinom n :=
calc
(n + 1) * (2 * (n + 1)).choose (n + 1) = (2 * n + 2).choose (n + 1) * (n + 1) := mul_comm _ _
_ = (2 * n + 1).choose n * (2 * n + 2) := by rw [choose_succ_right_eq, choose_mul_succ_eq]
_ = 2 * ((2 * n + 1).choose n * (n + 1)) := by ring
_ = 2 * ((2 * n + 1).choose n * (2 * n + 1 - n)) := by rw [two_mul n, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
_ = 2 * ((2 * n).choose n * (2 * n + 1)) := by rw [choose_mul_succ_eq]
_ = 2 * (2 * n + 1) * (2 * n).choose n := by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (2 * n + 1)]
/-- An exponential lower bound on the central binomial coefficient.
This bound is of interest because it appears in
[Tochiori's refinement of Erdős's proof of Bertrand's postulate](tochiori_bertrand).
-/
theorem four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom (n : ℕ) (n_big : 4 ≤ n) : 4 ^ n < n * centralBinom n := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rcases lt_trichotomy n 4 with (hn | rfl | hn)
· clear IH; exact False.elim ((not_lt.2 n_big) hn)
· norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_zero_of_lt hn)
calc
4 ^ (n + 1) < 4 * (n * centralBinom n) := lt_of_eq_of_lt pow_succ' <|
(mul_lt_mul_left <| zero_lt_four' ℕ).mpr (IH n n.lt_succ_self (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn))
_ ≤ 2 * (2 * n + 1) * centralBinom n := by rw [← mul_assoc]; linarith
_ = (n + 1) * centralBinom (n + 1) := (succ_mul_centralBinom_succ n).symm
/-- An exponential lower bound on the central binomial coefficient.
This bound is weaker than `Nat.four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom`, but it is of historical interest
because it appears in Erdős's proof of Bertrand's postulate.
-/
theorem four_pow_le_two_mul_self_mul_centralBinom :
∀ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), 4 ^ n ≤ 2 * n * centralBinom n
| 0, pr => (Nat.not_lt_zero _ pr).elim
| 1, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| 2, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| 3, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| n + 4, _ =>
calc
4 ^ (n+4) ≤ (n+4) * centralBinom (n+4) := (four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom _ le_add_self).le
_ ≤ 2 * (n+4) * centralBinom (n+4) := by
rw [mul_assoc]; refine Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ zero_lt_two
|
theorem two_dvd_centralBinom_succ (n : ℕ) : 2 ∣ centralBinom (n + 1) := by
use (n + 1 + n).choose n
rw [centralBinom_eq_two_mul_choose, two_mul, ← add_assoc,
choose_succ_succ' (n + 1 + n) n, choose_symm_add, ← two_mul]
theorem two_dvd_centralBinom_of_one_le {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : 2 ∣ centralBinom n := by
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h]
exact two_dvd_centralBinom_succ n.pred
/-- A crucial lemma to ensure that Catalan numbers can be defined via their explicit formula
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Central.lean | 105 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
/-!
# Limits in concrete categories
In this file, we combine the description of limits in `Types` and the API about
the preservation of products and pullbacks in order to describe these limits in a
concrete category `C`.
If `F : J → C` is a family of objects in `C`, we define a bijection
`Limits.Concrete.productEquiv F : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)`.
Similarly, if `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S` are two morphisms, the elements
in `pullback f₁ f₂` are identified by `Limits.Concrete.pullbackEquiv`
to compatible tuples of elements in `X₁ × X₂`.
Some results are also obtained for the terminal object, binary products,
wide-pullbacks, wide-pushouts, multiequalizers and cokernels.
-/
universe w w' v u t r
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section Products
section ProductEquiv
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type max w v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w v} C FC] {J : Type w} (F : J → C)
[HasProduct F] [PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor F) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)` if `F : J → C` is a family of objects
in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def productEquiv : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j) :=
((PreservesProduct.iso (forget C) F) ≪≫ (Types.productIso.{w, v} fun j => ToType (F j))).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_apply_apply (x : ToType (∏ᶜ F)) (j : J) :
productEquiv F x j = Pi.π F j x :=
congr_fun (piComparison_comp_π (forget C) F j) x
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_symm_apply_π (x : ∀ j, ToType (F j)) (j : J) :
Pi.π F j ((productEquiv F).symm x) = x j := by
rw [← productEquiv_apply_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
end ProductEquiv
section ProductExt
variable {J : Type w} (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] {D : Type t} [Category.{r} D]
variable {FD : D → D → Type*} {DD : D → Type max w r} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (DD X) (DD Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w r} D FD] (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor f) F]
[HasProduct fun j => F.obj (f j)]
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan (forget D)]
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor fun b ↦ F.toPrefunctor.obj (f b)) (forget D)]
lemma Pi.map_ext (x y : ToType (F.obj (∏ᶜ f : C)))
(h : ∀ i, F.map (Pi.π f i) x = F.map (Pi.π f i) y) : x = y := by
apply ConcreteCategory.injective_of_mono_of_preservesPullback (PreservesProduct.iso F f).hom
apply Concrete.limit_ext _ (piComparison F _ x) (piComparison F _ y)
intro ⟨j⟩
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, piComparison_comp_π]
exact h j
end ProductExt
end Products
section Terminal
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves terminals and `X` is terminal, then `ToType X` is a
singleton. -/
noncomputable def uniqueOfTerminalOfPreserves [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : IsTerminal X) : Unique (ToType X) :=
Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X) <| IsTerminal.isTerminalObj (forget C) X h
/-- If `forget C` reflects terminals and `ToType X` is a singleton, then `X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def terminalOfUniqueOfReflects [ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : Unique (ToType X)) : IsTerminal X :=
IsTerminal.isTerminalOfObj (forget C) X <| (Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X)).symm h
/-- The equivalence `IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X)` if the forgetful functor
preserves and reflects terminals. -/
noncomputable def terminalIffUnique [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X) :=
(IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (forget C) X).trans <| Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
variable (C)
variable [HasTerminal C] [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit` when `C` is a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def terminalEquiv : ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit :=
(PreservesTerminal.iso (forget C) ≪≫ Types.terminalIso).toEquiv
noncomputable instance : Unique (ToType (⊤_ C)) where
default := (terminalEquiv C).symm PUnit.unit
uniq _ := (terminalEquiv C).injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end Terminal
section Initial
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves initials and `X` is initial, then `ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma empty_of_initial_of_preserves [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : Nonempty (IsInitial X)) : IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty]
exact Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialObj (forget C) _) h
/-- If `forget C` reflects initials and `ToType X` is empty, then `X` is initial. -/
lemma initial_of_empty_of_reflects [ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : IsEmpty (ToType X)) : Nonempty (IsInitial X) :=
Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialOfObj (forget C) _) <|
(Types.initial_iff_empty (ToType X)).mpr h
/-- If `forget C` preserves and reflects initials, then `X` is initial if and only if
`ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma initial_iff_empty_of_preserves_of_reflects [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
Nonempty (IsInitial X) ↔ IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty, (IsInitial.isInitialIffObj (forget C) X).nonempty_congr]
rfl
end Initial
section BinaryProducts
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC] (X₁ X₂ : C) [HasBinaryProduct X₁ X₂]
[PreservesLimit (pair X₁ X₂) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ (ToType X₁) × (ToType X₂)`
if `X₁` and `X₂` are objects in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def prodEquiv : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ :=
(PreservesLimitPair.iso (forget C) X₁ X₂ ≪≫ Types.binaryProductIso _ _).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_fst (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).fst = (Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_fst (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_snd (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).snd = (Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_snd (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_fst (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.1 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_snd (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.2 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
end BinaryProducts
section Pullbacks
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable {X₁ X₂ S : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S)
[HasPullback f₁ f₂] [PreservesLimit (cospan f₁ f₂) (forget C)]
/-- In a concrete category `C`, given two morphisms `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S`,
the elements in `pullback f₁ f₁` can be identified to compatible tuples of
elements in `X₁` and `X₂`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackEquiv :
ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) ≃ { p : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ // f₁ p.1 = f₂ p.2 } :=
(PreservesPullback.iso (forget C) f₁ f₂ ≪≫
Types.pullbackIsoPullback ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁) ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)).toEquiv
/-- Constructor for elements in a pullback in a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def pullbackMk (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) :=
(pullbackEquiv f₁ f₂).symm ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, h⟩
lemma pullbackMk_surjective (x : ToType (pullback f₁ f₂)) :
∃ (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂), x = pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, h⟩, rfl⟩ := (pullbackEquiv f₁ f₂).symm.surjective x
exact ⟨x₁, x₂, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma pullbackMk_fst (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
pullback.fst f₁ f₂ (pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h) = x₁ :=
(congr_fun (PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst (forget C) f₁ f₂) _).trans
(congr_fun (Types.pullbackIsoPullback_inv_fst ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁)
⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)) _)
@[simp]
lemma pullbackMk_snd (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
pullback.snd f₁ f₂ (pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h) = x₂ :=
(congr_fun (PreservesPullback.iso_inv_snd (forget C) f₁ f₂) _).trans
(congr_fun (Types.pullbackIsoPullback_inv_snd ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁)
⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)) _)
end Pullbacks
section WidePullback
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type (max v w)} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max v w} C FC]
open WidePullback
open WidePullbackShape
theorem widePullback_ext {B : C} {ι : Type w} {X : ι → C} (f : ∀ j : ι, X j ⟶ B)
[HasWidePullback B X f] [PreservesLimit (wideCospan B X f) (forget C)]
(x y : ToType (widePullback B X f)) (h₀ : base f x = base f y) (h : ∀ j, π f j x = π f j y) :
x = y := by
| apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | j)
· exact h₀
· apply h
theorem widePullback_ext' {B : C} {ι : Type w} [Nonempty ι] {X : ι → C}
(f : ∀ j : ι, X j ⟶ B) [HasWidePullback.{w} B X f]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ConcreteCategory.lean | 239 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
infer_instance
/-- Prefer `imageToKernel`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) (h) :
Subobject.ofLE (imageSubobject f) (kernelSubobject g) h = imageToKernel f g w :=
rfl
attribute [local instance] HasForget.instFunLike
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
-- a more suitable lemma is added below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageToKernel_arrow (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [imageToKernel]
@[simp]
lemma imageToKernel_arrow_apply {FV : V → V → Type*} {CV : V → Type*}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FV X Y) (CV X) (CV Y)] [ConcreteCategory V FV] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(x : ToType (Subobject.underlying.obj (imageSubobject f))) :
(kernelSubobject g).arrow (imageToKernel f g w x) =
(imageSubobject f).arrow x := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, imageToKernel_arrow]
-- This is less useful as a `simp` lemma than it initially appears,
-- as it "loses" the information the morphism factors through the image.
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ imageToKernel f g w = factorThruKernelSubobject g f w := by
ext
simp
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C)
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_zero_left [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] {w} :
imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g w = 0 := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_zero_right [HasImages V] {w} :
imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) w =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ inv (kernelSubobject (0 : B ⟶ C)).arrow := by
ext
simp
section
variable [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_right {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]) =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le g h) := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_comp_left {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g (by simp [w]) =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_mono {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) [Mono h] (w) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) w =
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simpa using w : (f ≫ g) ≫ h = 0 ≫ h)) ≫
(Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_mono g h)).inv := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_epi_comp {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) [Epi h] (w) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g w =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using w : h ≫ f ≫ g = h ≫ 0)) := by
ext
simp
end
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp [HasEqualizers V] [HasImages V] {Z : V} {i : B ≅ Z} (w) :
imageToKernel (f ≫ i.hom) (i.inv ≫ g) w =
(imageSubobjectCompIso _ _).hom ≫
imageToKernel f g (by simpa using w) ≫ (kernelSubobjectIsoComp i.inv g).inv := by
ext
simp
open ZeroObject
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --0--> B --g--> C`, where `g` is a mono is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] [Mono g] :
Epi (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g (by simp)) :=
epi_of_target_iso_zero _ (kernelSubobjectIso g ≪≫ kernel.ofMono g)
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --f--> B --0--> C`, where `g` is an epi is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero [HasImages V] [Epi f] :
Epi (imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) (by simp)) := by
simp only [imageToKernel_zero_right]
haveI := epi_image_of_epi f
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
infer_instance
end
section imageToKernel'
/-!
We provide a variant `imageToKernel' : image f ⟶ kernel g`,
and use this to give alternative formulas for `homology f g w`.
-/
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C) (w : f ≫ g = 0) [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
/-- While `imageToKernel f g w` provides a morphism
`imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g`
in terms of the subobject API,
this variant provides a morphism
`image f ⟶ kernel g`,
which is sometimes more convenient.
-/
def imageToKernel' (w : f ≫ g = 0) : image f ⟶ kernel g :=
kernel.lift g (image.ι f) <| by
ext
simpa using w
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobjectIso_imageToKernel' (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
(imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ imageToKernel' f g w =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso g).hom := by
ext
simp [imageToKernel']
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel'_kernelSubobjectIso (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel' f g w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso g).inv =
(imageSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp [imageToKernel']
end imageToKernel'
end
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 315 | 321 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# The complex numbers
The complex numbers are modelled as ℝ^2 in the obvious way and it is shown that they form a field
of characteristic zero. The result that the complex numbers are algebraically closed, see
`FieldTheory.AlgebraicClosure`.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset Algebra
open Set Function
/-! ### Definition and basic arithmetic -/
/-- Complex numbers consist of two `Real`s: a real part `re` and an imaginary part `im`. -/
structure Complex : Type where
/-- The real part of a complex number. -/
re : ℝ
/-- The imaginary part of a complex number. -/
im : ℝ
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℂ" => Complex
namespace Complex
open ComplexConjugate
noncomputable instance : DecidableEq ℂ :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- The equivalence between the complex numbers and `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivRealProd : ℂ ≃ ℝ × ℝ where
toFun z := ⟨z.re, z.im⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, p.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ z : ℂ, Complex.mk z.re z.im = z
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
-- We only mark this lemma with `ext` *locally* to avoid it applying whenever terms of `ℂ` appear.
theorem ext : ∀ {z w : ℂ}, z.re = w.re → z.im = w.im → z = w
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
attribute [local ext] Complex.ext
lemma «forall» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
lemma «exists» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
theorem re_surjective : Surjective re := fun x => ⟨⟨x, 0⟩, rfl⟩
theorem im_surjective : Surjective im := fun y => ⟨⟨0, y⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_re : range re = univ :=
re_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_im : range im = univ :=
im_surjective.range_eq
/-- The natural inclusion of the real numbers into the complex numbers. -/
@[coe]
def ofReal (r : ℝ) : ℂ :=
⟨r, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℝ ℂ :=
⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_re (r : ℝ) : Complex.re (r : ℂ) = r :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_im (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem ofReal_def (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ) = ⟨r, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = w ↔ z = w :=
⟨congrArg re, by apply congrArg⟩
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) := fun _ _ => congrArg re
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℝ (↑) fun z => z.im = 0 where
prf z hz := ⟨z.re, ext rfl hz.symm⟩
/-- The product of a set on the real axis and a set on the imaginary axis of the complex plane,
denoted by `s ×ℂ t`. -/
def reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : Set ℂ :=
re ⁻¹' s ∩ im ⁻¹' t
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-03")] protected alias Set.reProdIm := reProdIm
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:72 " ×ℂ " => reProdIm
theorem mem_reProdIm {z : ℂ} {s t : Set ℝ} : z ∈ s ×ℂ t ↔ z.re ∈ s ∧ z.im ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
instance : Zero ℂ :=
⟨(0 : ℝ)⟩
instance : Inhabited ℂ :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℂ).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_zero
instance : One ℂ :=
⟨(1 : ℝ)⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℂ).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 1 ↔ z = 1 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 1 ↔ z ≠ 1 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_one
instance : Add ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re + w.re, z.im + w.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
-- replaced by `re_ofNat`
-- replaced by `im_ofNat`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r + s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
-- replaced by `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`
instance : Neg ℂ :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.re, -z.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℂ) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℂ) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : ℂ) = -r :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
instance : Sub ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re - w.re, z.im - w.im⟩⟩
instance : Mul ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im, z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r * s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).re = r * z.re := by simp [ofReal]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).im = r * z.im := by simp [ofReal]
lemma re_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).re = z.re * r := by simp [ofReal]
lemma im_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).im = z.im * r := by simp [ofReal]
theorem ofReal_mul' (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : ↑r * z = ⟨r * z.re, r * z.im⟩ :=
ext (re_ofReal_mul _ _) (im_ofReal_mul _ _)
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
def I : ℂ :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem I_re : I.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_im : I.im = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_mul_I : I * I = -1 :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
theorem I_mul (z : ℂ) : I * z = ⟨-z.im, z.re⟩ :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
@[simp] lemma I_ne_zero : (I : ℂ) ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) zero_ne_one.symm
theorem mk_eq_add_mul_I (a b : ℝ) : Complex.mk a b = a + b * I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im (z : ℂ) : (z.re : ℂ) + z.im * I = z :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem mul_I_re (z : ℂ) : (z * I).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem mul_I_im (z : ℂ) : (z * I).im = z.re := by simp
theorem I_mul_re (z : ℂ) : (I * z).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem I_mul_im (z : ℂ) : (I * z).im = z.re := by simp
@[simp]
theorem equivRealProd_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) : equivRealProd.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * I := by
ext <;> simp [Complex.equivRealProd, ofReal]
/-- The natural `AddEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs apply symm_apply_re symm_apply_im]
def equivRealProdAddHom : ℂ ≃+ ℝ × ℝ :=
{ equivRealProd with map_add' := by simp }
theorem equivRealProdAddHom_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) :
equivRealProdAddHom.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * I := equivRealProd_symm_apply p
/-! ### Commutative ring instance and lemmas -/
/- We use a nonstandard formula for the `ℕ` and `ℤ` actions to make sure there is no
diamond from the other actions they inherit through the `ℝ`-action on `ℂ` and action transitivity
defined in `Data.Complex.Module`. -/
instance : Nontrivial ℂ :=
domain_nontrivial re rfl rfl
namespace SMul
-- The useless `0` multiplication in `smul` is to make sure that
-- `RestrictScalars.module ℝ ℂ ℂ = Complex.module` definitionally.
-- instance made scoped to avoid situations like instance synthesis
-- of `SMul ℂ ℂ` trying to proceed via `SMul ℂ ℝ`.
/-- Scalar multiplication by `R` on `ℝ` extends to `ℂ`. This is used here and in
`Matlib.Data.Complex.Module` to transfer instances from `ℝ` to `ℂ`, but is not
needed outside, so we make it scoped. -/
scoped instance instSMulRealComplex {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ] : SMul R ℂ where
smul r x := ⟨r • x.re - 0 * x.im, r • x.im + 0 * x.re⟩
end SMul
open scoped SMul
section SMul
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ]
theorem smul_re (r : R) (z : ℂ) : (r • z).re = r • z.re := by simp [(· • ·), SMul.smul]
theorem smul_im (r : R) (z : ℂ) : (r • z).im = r • z.im := by simp [(· • ·), SMul.smul]
@[simp]
theorem real_smul {x : ℝ} {z : ℂ} : x • z = x * z :=
rfl
end SMul
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup ℂ :=
{ zero := (0 : ℂ)
add := (· + ·)
neg := Neg.neg
sub := Sub.sub
nsmul := fun n z => n • z
zsmul := fun n z => n • z
zsmul_zero' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im]
nsmul_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im]
nsmul_succ := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
zsmul_succ' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
zsmul_neg' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
add_assoc := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
zero_add := by intros; ext <;> simp
add_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp
add_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
neg_add_cancel := by intros; ext <;> simp }
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne ℂ :=
{ Complex.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
natCast_zero := by
ext <;> simp [Nat.cast, AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero]
natCast_succ := fun _ => by ext <;> simp [Nat.cast, AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ]
intCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun _ => by ext <;> rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by
ext
· simp [AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc]
show -(1 : ℝ) + (-n) = -(↑(n + 1))
simp [Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
· simp [AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc]
show im ⟨n, 0⟩ = 0
rfl
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing ℂ :=
{ addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec _ ⟨(1 : ℂ)⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
add_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
left_distrib := by intros; ext <;> simp [mul_re, mul_im] <;> ring
right_distrib := by intros; ext <;> simp [mul_re, mul_im] <;> ring
zero_mul := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_assoc := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
one_mul := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_one := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring }
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `Ring` via the noncomputable `Complex.field`
instance. -/
instance : Ring ℂ := by infer_instance
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `CommSemiring` via the noncomputable
`Complex.field` instance. -/
instance : CommSemiring ℂ :=
inferInstance
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `Semiring` via the noncomputable
`Complex.field` instance. -/
instance : Semiring ℂ :=
inferInstance
/-- The "real part" map, considered as an additive group homomorphism. -/
def reAddGroupHom : ℂ →+ ℝ where
toFun := re
map_zero' := zero_re
map_add' := add_re
@[simp]
theorem coe_reAddGroupHom : (reAddGroupHom : ℂ → ℝ) = re :=
rfl
/-- The "imaginary part" map, considered as an additive group homomorphism. -/
def imAddGroupHom : ℂ →+ ℝ where
toFun := im
map_zero' := zero_im
map_add' := add_im
@[simp]
theorem coe_imAddGroupHom : (imAddGroupHom : ℂ → ℝ) = im :=
rfl
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℂ where nnratCast q := ofReal q
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℂ where ratCast q := ofReal q
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofReal ofNat(n) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ofReal n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ofReal n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ofReal q = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ofReal q = q := rfl
@[simp]
lemma re_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℂ).re = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℂ).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℂ).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma re_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℂ).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma im_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : (q : ℂ).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : (q : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
lemma re_nsmul (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).re = n • z.re := smul_re ..
lemma im_nsmul (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).im = n • z.im := smul_im ..
lemma re_zsmul (n : ℤ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).re = n • z.re := smul_re ..
lemma im_zsmul (n : ℤ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).im = n • z.im := smul_im ..
@[simp] lemma re_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).re = q • z.re := smul_re ..
@[simp] lemma im_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).im = q • z.im := smul_im ..
@[simp] lemma re_qsmul (q : ℚ) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).re = q • z.re := smul_re ..
@[simp] lemma im_qsmul (q : ℚ) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).im = q • z.im := smul_im ..
@[norm_cast] lemma ofReal_nsmul (n : ℕ) (r : ℝ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℂ) := by simp
@[norm_cast] lemma ofReal_zsmul (n : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℂ) := by simp
/-! ### Complex conjugation -/
/-- This defines the complex conjugate as the `star` operation of the `StarRing ℂ`. It
is recommended to use the ring endomorphism version `starRingEnd`, available under the
notation `conj` in the locale `ComplexConjugate`. -/
instance : StarRing ℂ where
star z := ⟨z.re, -z.im⟩
star_involutive x := by simp only [eta, neg_neg]
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm] <;> ring
star_add a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem conj_re (z : ℂ) : (conj z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conj_im (z : ℂ) : (conj z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : ℂ) = r :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [star]
@[simp]
theorem conj_I : conj I = -I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
theorem conj_natCast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : ℂ) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = I := by simp
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = r :=
⟨fun h => ⟨z.re, ext rfl <| eq_zero_of_neg_eq (congr_arg im h)⟩, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => by
rw [e, conj_ofReal]⟩
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ (z.re : ℂ) = z :=
conj_eq_iff_real.trans ⟨by rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp [ofReal], fun h => ⟨_, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ z.im = 0 :=
⟨fun h => add_self_eq_zero.mp (neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg im h)), fun h =>
ext rfl (neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero.mpr (add_self_eq_zero.mpr h))⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : ℂ → ℂ) = conj :=
rfl
/-! ### Norm squared -/
/-- The norm squared function. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def normSq : ℂ →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' z w := by
dsimp
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : ℂ) : normSq z = z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im :=
| rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Basic.lean | 500 | 500 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- The equivalence between monic polynomials of degree `n` and polynomials of degree less than
`n`, formed by adding a term `X ^ n`. -/
def monicEquivDegreeLT [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
{ p : R[X] // p.Monic ∧ p.natDegree = n } ≃ degreeLT R n where
toFun p := ⟨p.1.eraseLead, by
rcases p with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_degreeLT]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ degree_le_natDegree
exact degree_eraseLead_lt (ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic one_ne_zero hp)⟩
invFun := fun p =>
⟨X^n + p.1, monic_X_pow_add (mem_degreeLT.1 p.2), by
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 p.2]⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
ext1
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow p]
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, add_comm]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only
rw [eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 hp]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp +contextual only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp +contextual only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coe_subtype]
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem degree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).natDegree = p.natDegree := by simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_toSubring : Monic (toSubring p T hp) ↔ Monic p := by
simp_rw [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_toSubring, ← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_zero : toSubring (0 : R[X]) T (by simp [coeffs]) = 0 := by
ext i
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_one :
toSubring (1 : R[X]) T
(Set.Subset.trans coeffs_one <| Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 T.one_mem) =
1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by
rw [coeff_toSubring', coeff_one, coeff_one, apply_ite Subtype.val, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero,
OneMemClass.coe_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_toSubring : (p.toSubring T hp).map (Subring.subtype T) = p := by
ext n
simp [coeff_map]
end ToSubring
variable (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial whose coefficients are in some subring, return
the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in the ambient ring. -/
def ofSubring (p : T[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i : R)
theorem coeff_ofSubring (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (ofSubring T p) n = (coeff p n : T) := by
simp only [ofSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
ite_eq_right_iff, Ne, ite_not, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro h
rw [h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_ofSubring {p : T[X]} : (↑(p.ofSubring T).coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [coeffs, Set.mem_image, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_coe,
(Finset.coe_image)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨n, _, h'n⟩
rw [← h'n, coeff_ofSubring]
exact Subtype.mem (coeff p n : T)
end Ring
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- Transport an ideal of `R[X]` to an `R`-submodule of `R[X]`. -/
def ofPolynomial (I : Ideal R[X]) : Submodule R R[X] where
carrier := I.carrier
zero_mem' := I.zero_mem
add_mem' := I.add_mem
smul_mem' c x H := by
rw [← C_mul']
exact I.mul_mem_left _ H
variable {I : Ideal R[X]}
theorem mem_ofPolynomial (x) : x ∈ I.ofPolynomial ↔ x ∈ I :=
Iff.rfl
variable (I)
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the `R`-submodule of `I`
consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
Polynomial.degreeLE R n ⊓ I.ofPolynomial
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of
leading coefficients of polynomials in `I` with degree ≤ `n`. -/
def leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) : Ideal R :=
(I.degreeLE n).map <| lcoeff R n
/-- Given an ideal `I` in `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of the
leading coefficients in `I`. -/
def leadingCoeff : Ideal R :=
⨆ n : ℕ, I.leadingCoeffNth n
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S]
/-- If every coefficient of a polynomial is in an ideal `I`, then so is the polynomial itself -/
theorem polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal (I : Ideal R[X]) (p : R[X])
(hp : ∀ n : ℕ, p.coeff n ∈ I.comap (C : R →+* R[X])) : p ∈ I :=
sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p ▸ Submodule.sum_mem I fun n _ => I.mul_mem_right _ (hp n)
/-- The push-forward of an ideal `I` of `R` to `R[X]` via inclusion
is exactly the set of polynomials whose coefficients are in `I` -/
theorem mem_map_C_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R[X]} :
f ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, f.coeff n ∈ I := by
constructor
· intro hf
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hf
· intro f hf n
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hf
rw [← hx.right, coeff_C]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simpa [h] using hx.left
· simp [h]
· simp
· exact fun f g _ _ hf hg n => by simp [I.add_mem (hf n) (hg n)]
· refine fun f g _ hg n => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul]
exact I.sum_mem fun c _ => I.mul_mem_left (f.coeff c.fst) (hg c.snd)
· intro hf
rw [← sum_monomial_eq f]
refine (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).sum_mem fun n _ => ?_
simp only [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ne_eq]
rw [mul_comm]
exact (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).mul_mem_left _ (mem_map_of_mem _ (hf n))
theorem _root_.Polynomial.ker_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) :
RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom f) = (RingHom.ker f).map (C : R →+* R[X]) := by
ext
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom]
rw [mem_map_C_iff, Polynomial.ext_iff]
simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable (I : Ideal R[X])
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) (x) :
x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth n ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, degree p ≤ n ∧ p.leadingCoeff = x := by
simp only [leadingCoeffNth, degreeLE, Submodule.mem_map, lcoeff_apply, Submodule.mem_inf,
mem_degreeLE]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, ⟨hpdeg, hpI⟩, rfl⟩
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hpdeg with hpdeg | hpdeg
· refine ⟨0, I.zero_mem, bot_le, ?_⟩
rw [leadingCoeff_zero, eq_comm]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hpdeg
· refine ⟨p, hpI, le_of_eq hpdeg, ?_⟩
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, hpdeg, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
· rintro ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
have : natDegree p + (n - natDegree p) = n :=
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg)
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - natDegree p), ⟨?_, I.mul_mem_right _ hpI⟩, ?_⟩
· apply le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) _
apply le_trans (add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_X_pow_le _)) _
rw [← Nat.cast_add, this]
· rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow p (n - natDegree p), this]
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth_zero (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth 0 ↔ C x ∈ I :=
(mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _ _).trans
⟨fun ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, hpx⟩ => by
rwa [← hpx, Polynomial.leadingCoeff,
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg), ← eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpdeg],
fun hx => ⟨C x, hx, degree_C_le, leadingCoeff_C x⟩⟩
theorem leadingCoeffNth_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : I.leadingCoeffNth m ≤ I.leadingCoeffNth n := by
intro r hr
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_leadingCoeffNth] at hr ⊢
rcases hr with ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - m), I.mul_mem_right _ hpI, ?_, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow⟩
refine le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) ?_
refine le_trans (add_le_add hpdeg (degree_X_pow_le _)) ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le H]
theorem mem_leadingCoeff (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeff ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, Polynomial.leadingCoeff p = x := by
rw [leadingCoeff, Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed]
· simp only [mem_leadingCoeffNth]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, p, hpI, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p, p, hpI, degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩
intro i j
exact
⟨i + j, I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_right _ _),
I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩
/-- If `I` is an ideal, and `pᵢ` is a finite family of polynomials each satisfying
`∀ k, (pᵢ)ₖ ∈ Iⁿⁱ⁻ᵏ` for some `nᵢ`, then `p = ∏ pᵢ` also satisfies `∀ k, pₖ ∈ Iⁿ⁻ᵏ` with `n = ∑ nᵢ`.
-/
theorem _root_.Polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(I : Ideal R) (n : ι → ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ (k), (f i).coeff k ∈ I ^ (n i - k)) (k : ℕ) :
(s.prod f).coeff k ∈ I ^ (s.sum n - k) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s ha hs generalizing k
· rw [sum_empty, prod_empty, coeff_one, zero_tsub, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· rw [sum_insert ha, prod_insert ha, coeff_mul]
apply sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ e
obtain rfl : i + j = k := mem_antidiagonal.mp e
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub
rw [pow_add]
exact
Ideal.mul_mem_mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inl rfl) _)
(hs (fun i hi k => h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inr hi) _) j)
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- `R[X]` is never a field for any ring `R`. -/
theorem polynomial_not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro hR
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel X_ne_zero
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hp
have := degree_lt_degree_mul_X hp0
rw [← X_mul, congr_arg degree hp, degree_one, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot] at this
exact hp0 this
/-- The only constant in a maximal ideal over a field is `0`. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal (hR : IsField R) (I : Ideal R[X]) [hI : I.IsMaximal]
(x : R) (hx : C x ∈ I) : x = 0 := by
refine Classical.by_contradiction fun hx0 => hI.ne_top ((eq_top_iff_one I).2 ?_)
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel hx0
convert I.mul_mem_left (C y) hx
rw [← C.map_mul, hR.mul_comm y x, hy, RingHom.map_one]
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime (P : Ideal R) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) ↔ IsPrime P := by
-- Note: the following proof avoids quotient rings
-- It can be golfed substantially by using something like
-- `(Quotient.isDomain_iff_prime (map C P : Ideal R[X]))`
constructor
· intro H
have := comap_isPrime C (map C P)
convert this using 1
ext x
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map_C_iff]
constructor
· rintro h (- | n)
· rwa [coeff_C_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro h
simpa only [coeff_C_zero] using h 0
· intro h
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_top_iff_one, mem_map_C_iff, not_forall]
use 0
rw [coeff_one_zero, ← eq_top_iff_one]
exact h.1
· intro f g
simp only [mem_map_C_iff]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
classical
let m := Nat.find hf
let n := Nat.find hg
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.insert_erase ((Finset.mem_antidiagonal (a := (m,n))).mpr rfl),
Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _), (P.add_mem_iff_left _).not]
· apply mt h.2
rw [not_or]
exact ⟨Nat.find_spec hf, Nat.find_spec hg⟩
apply P.sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hij
simp only [Ne, Prod.mk_inj, not_and_or] at hij
obtain hi | hj : i < m ∨ j < n := by
omega
· rw [mul_comm]
apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hf hi)
· apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hg hj)
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime {P : Ideal R} (H : IsPrime P) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) :=
(isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime P).mpr H
theorem is_fg_degreeLE [IsNoetherianRing R] (I : Ideal R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
Submodule.FG (I.degreeLE n) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
isNoetherian_submodule_left.1
(isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨_, degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow.symm⟩) _
end CommRing
end Ideal
section Ideal
open Submodule Set
variable [Semiring R] {f : R[X]} {I : Ideal R[X]}
/-- If the coefficients of a polynomial belong to an ideal, then that ideal contains
the ideal spanned by the coefficients of the polynomial. -/
theorem span_le_of_C_coeff_mem (cf : ∀ i : ℕ, C (f.coeff i) ∈ I) :
Ideal.span { g | ∃ i, g = C (f.coeff i) } ≤ I := by
simp only [@eq_comm _ _ (C _)]
exact (Ideal.span_le.trans range_subset_iff).mpr cf
theorem mem_span_C_coeff : f ∈ Ideal.span { g : R[X] | ∃ i : ℕ, g = C (coeff f i) } := by
let p := Ideal.span { g : R[X] | ∃ i : ℕ, g = C (coeff f i) }
nth_rw 2 [(sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq f).symm]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun n _hn => ?_
dsimp
have : C (coeff f n) ∈ p := by
apply subset_span
rw [mem_setOf_eq]
use n
have : monomial n (1 : R) • C (coeff f n) ∈ p := p.smul_mem _ this
convert this using 1
simp only [monomial_mul_C, one_mul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
theorem exists_C_coeff_not_mem : f ∉ I → ∃ i : ℕ, C (coeff f i) ∉ I :=
Not.imp_symm fun cf => span_le_of_C_coeff_mem (not_exists_not.mp cf) mem_span_C_coeff
end Ideal
variable {σ : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
section Prime
variable (σ) {r : R}
namespace Polynomial
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C (evalRingHom (0 : R)) fun _ => eval_C, fun hr => by
have := hr.1
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_prime] at hr ⊢
· rw [← Set.image_singleton, ← Ideal.map_span]
apply Ideal.isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime hr
· intro h; apply (this (C_eq_zero.mp h))
· assumption⟩
end Polynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
private theorem prime_C_iff_of_fintype {R : Type u} (σ : Type v) {r : R} [CommRing R] [Fintype σ] :
Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r := by
rw [← MulEquiv.prime_iff (renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ))]
convert_to Prime (C r) ↔ _
· congr!
simp only [renameEquiv_apply, algHom_C, algebraMap_eq]
· induction' Fintype.card σ with d hd
· exact MulEquiv.prime_iff (isEmptyAlgEquiv R (Fin 0)).symm (p := r)
· convert MulEquiv.prime_iff (finSuccEquiv R d).symm (p := Polynomial.C (C r))
· simp [← finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C]
· simp [← hd, Polynomial.prime_C_iff]
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C constantCoeff (constantCoeff_C _), fun hr =>
⟨fun h => hr.1 <| by
rw [← C_inj, h]
simp,
fun h =>
hr.2.1 <| by
rw [← constantCoeff_C _ r]
exact h.map _,
fun a b hd => by
obtain ⟨s, a', b', rfl, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename₂ a b
rw [← algebraMap_eq] at hd
have : algebraMap R _ r ∣ a' * b' := by
convert killCompl Subtype.coe_injective |>.toRingHom.map_dvd hd <;> simp
rw [← rename_C ((↑) : s → σ)]
let f := (rename (R := R) ((↑) : s → σ)).toRingHom
exact (((prime_C_iff_of_fintype s).2 hr).2.2 a' b' this).imp f.map_dvd f.map_dvd⟩⟩
variable {σ}
theorem prime_rename_iff (s : Set σ) {p : MvPolynomial s R} :
Prime (rename ((↑) : s → σ) p) ↔ Prime (p : MvPolynomial s R) := by
classical
symm
let eqv :=
(sumAlgEquiv R (↥sᶜ) s).symm.trans
(renameEquiv R <| (Equiv.sumComm (↥sᶜ) s).trans <| Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
have : (rename (↑)).toRingHom = eqv.toAlgHom.toRingHom.comp C := by
apply ringHom_ext
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_C,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_C, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply]
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_X,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_X, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply, Sum.swap_inr,
Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inl]
apply_fun (· p) at this
simp only [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply] at this
rw [this, MulEquiv.prime_iff, prime_C_iff]
end MvPolynomial
end Prime
/-- **Hilbert basis theorem**: a polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring. -/
protected theorem Polynomial.isNoetherianRing [inst : IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing R[X] :=
isNoetherianRing_iff.2
⟨fun I : Ideal R[X] =>
let M := inst.wf.min (Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth) ⟨_, ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
have hm : M ∈ Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth := WellFounded.min_mem _ _ _
let ⟨N, HN⟩ := hm
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := I.is_fg_degreeLE N
have hm2 : ∀ k, I.leadingCoeffNth k ≤ M := fun k =>
Or.casesOn (le_or_lt k N) (fun h => HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono h) fun h _ hx =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hxm =>
haveI : IsNoetherian R R := inst
have : ¬M < I.leadingCoeffNth k := by
refine WellFounded.not_lt_min inst.wf _ _ ?_; exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
this ⟨HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (le_of_lt h), fun H => hxm (H hx)⟩
have hs2 : ∀ {x}, x ∈ I.degreeLE N → x ∈ Ideal.span (↑s : Set R[X]) :=
hs ▸ fun hx =>
Submodule.span_induction (hx := hx) (fun _ hx => Ideal.subset_span hx) (Ideal.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ _ _ => Ideal.add_mem _) fun c f _ hf => f.C_mul' c ▸ Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hf
⟨s, le_antisymm (Ideal.span_le.2 fun x hx =>
have : x ∈ I.degreeLE N := hs ▸ Submodule.subset_span hx
this.2) <| by
have : Submodule.span R[X] ↑s = Ideal.span ↑s := rfl
rw [this]
intro p hp
generalize hn : p.natDegree = k
induction' k using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ih generalizing p
rcases le_or_lt k N with h | h
· subst k
refine hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2
(le_trans Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 h), hp⟩
· have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
cases hn
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ h
have : (0 : R) ≠ 1 := by
intro h
apply hp0
ext i
refine (mul_one _).symm.trans ?_
rw [← h, mul_zero]
rfl
haveI : Nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, this⟩⟩
have : p.leadingCoeff ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth N := by
rw [HN]
exact hm2 k ((I.mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _).2
⟨_, hp, hn ▸ Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩)
rw [I.mem_leadingCoeffNth] at this
rcases this with ⟨q, hq, hdq, hlqp⟩
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := by
intro H
rw [← Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
rw [hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
exact hp0 H
have h1 : p.degree = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).degree := by
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul', Polynomial.degree_X_pow]
· rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hq0]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le, hn]
· refine le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le hdq) (le_of_lt h)
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow, mul_one]
exact mt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hq0
have h2 : p.leadingCoeff = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).leadingCoeff := by
rw [← hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow]
have := Polynomial.degree_sub_lt h1 hp0 h2
rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0] at this
rw [← sub_add_cancel p (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree))]
convert (Ideal.span ↑s).add_mem _ ((Ideal.span (s : Set R[X])).mul_mem_right _ _)
· by_cases hpq : p - q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree) = 0
· rw [hpq]
exact Ideal.zero_mem _
refine ih _ ?_ (I.sub_mem hp (I.mul_mem_right _ hq)) rfl
rwa [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hpq, Nat.cast_lt, hn] at this
exact hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2 hdq, hq⟩⟩⟩
attribute [instance] Polynomial.isNoetherianRing
namespace Polynomial
theorem linearIndependent_powers_iff_aeval (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v : M) :
(LinearIndependent R fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) v) ↔ ∀ p : R[X], aeval f p v = 0 → p = 0 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff]
simp only [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, aeval_endomorphism, forall_iff_forall_finsupp, Sum,
support, coeff, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_ker_aeval_of_isCoprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
Disjoint (LinearMap.ker (aeval f p)) (LinearMap.ker (aeval f q)) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro v hv
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
simpa [LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).1,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).2] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias disjoint_ker_aeval_of_coprime := disjoint_ker_aeval_of_isCoprime
theorem sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_isCoprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.range (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.range (aeval f q) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
intro v _
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
use aeval f (p * p') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f p' v, by simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
use aeval f (q * q') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f q' v, by simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
simpa only [mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q', aeval_one, aeval_add] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_coprime := sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_isCoprime
theorem sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul {f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p q : R[X]} :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) ≤ LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by
intro v hv
rcases Submodule.mem_sup.1 hv with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
have h_eval_x : aeval f (p * q) x = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm, aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hx, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval_y : aeval f (p * q) y = 0 := by
rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hy, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, ← hxy, LinearMap.map_add, h_eval_x, h_eval_y, add_zero]
theorem sup_ker_aeval_eq_ker_aeval_mul_of_coprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]}
(hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) = LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by
apply le_antisymm sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul
intro v hv
| rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
have h_eval₂_qpp' :=
calc
aeval f (q * (p * p')) v = aeval f (p' * (p * q)) v := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm q p]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval₂_pqq' :=
calc
aeval f (p * (q * q')) v = aeval f (q' * (p * q)) v := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [aeval_mul] at h_eval₂_qpp' h_eval₂_pqq'
refine
⟨aeval f (q * q') v, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_pqq', aeval f (p * p') v,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_qpp', ?_⟩
rw [add_comm, mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q']
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, aeval_one] using congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
end Polynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
lemma aeval_natDegree_le {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {m n : ℕ}
(F : MvPolynomial σ R) (hF : F.totalDegree ≤ m)
(f : σ → Polynomial R) (hf : ∀ i, (f i).natDegree ≤ n) :
(MvPolynomial.aeval f F).natDegree ≤ m * n := by
rw [MvPolynomial.aeval_def, MvPolynomial.eval₂]
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_sum_le _ _).trans
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, ← C_eq_algebraMap]
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_le _ _).trans
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le _ _).trans
have : ∑ i ∈ d.support, (d i) * n ≤ m * n := by
rw [← Finset.sum_mul]
apply mul_le_mul' (.trans _ hF) le_rfl
rw [MvPolynomial.totalDegree]
exact Finset.le_sup_of_le hd le_rfl
apply (Finset.sum_le_sum _).trans this
rintro i -
apply Polynomial.natDegree_pow_le.trans
exact mul_le_mul' le_rfl (hf i)
theorem isNoetherianRing_fin_0 [IsNoetherianRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin 0) R) := by
apply isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv R
symm; apply MvPolynomial.isEmptyRingEquiv R (Fin 0)
theorem isNoetherianRing_fin [IsNoetherianRing R] :
∀ {n : ℕ}, IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)
| 0 => isNoetherianRing_fin_0
| n + 1 =>
@isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv (Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) _ _ _
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv _ n).toRingEquiv.symm
(@Polynomial.isNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) _ isNoetherianRing_fin)
/-- The multivariate polynomial ring in finitely many variables over a noetherian ring
is itself a noetherian ring. -/
instance isNoetherianRing [Finite σ] [IsNoetherianRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial σ R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype σ
exact
@isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv (MvPolynomial (Fin (Fintype.card σ)) R) _ _ _
(renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ).symm).toRingEquiv isNoetherianRing_fin
/-- Auxiliary lemma:
Multivariate polynomials over an integral domain
with variables indexed by `Fin n` form an integral domain.
This fact is proven inductively,
and then used to prove the general case without any finiteness hypotheses.
See `MvPolynomial.noZeroDivisors` for the general case. -/
theorem noZeroDivisors_fin (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 953 | 1,026 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.PreservesHomology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Injective.Basic
/-!
# Exact short complexes
When `S : ShortComplex C`, this file defines a structure
`S.Exact` which expresses the exactness of `S`, i.e. there
exists a homology data `h : S.HomologyData` such that
`h.left.H` is zero. When `[S.HasHomology]`, it is equivalent
to the assertion `IsZero S.homology`.
Almost by construction, this notion of exactness is self dual,
see `Exact.op` and `Exact.unop`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits ZeroObject Preadditive
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace ShortComplex
section
variable
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The assertion that the short complex `S : ShortComplex C` is exact. -/
structure Exact : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists an homology data whose `left.H` field is zero -/
condition : ∃ (h : S.HomologyData), IsZero h.left.H
variable {S}
lemma Exact.hasHomology (h : S.Exact) : S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' h.condition.choose
lemma Exact.hasZeroObject (h : S.Exact) : HasZeroObject C :=
⟨h.condition.choose.left.H, h.condition.choose_spec⟩
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_homology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.homology := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨h', z⟩⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso z h'.left.homologyIso
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_leftHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.leftHomology :=
LeftHomologyData.exact_iff _
lemma exact_iff_isZero_rightHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.rightHomology :=
RightHomologyData.exact_iff _
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.left.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact LeftHomologyData.exact_iff h.left
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff' (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.right.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact RightHomologyData.exact_iff h.right
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_homology_iso_zero [S.HasHomology] [HasZeroObject C] :
S.Exact ↔ Nonempty (S.homology ≅ 0) := by
rw [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isoZero⟩
· rintro ⟨e⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso (isZero_zero C) e
lemma exact_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : S₁.Exact) : S₂.Exact := by
obtain ⟨⟨h, z⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨HomologyData.ofIso e h, z⟩⟩
lemma exact_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact :=
⟨exact_of_iso e, exact_of_iso e.symm⟩
lemma exact_and_mono_f_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Mono S₁.f ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Mono S₂.f := by
have : Mono S₁.f ↔ Mono S₂.f :=
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₁.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₁₂)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_and_epi_g_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Epi S₁.g ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Epi S₂.g := by
have : Epi S₁.g ↔ Epi S₂.g :=
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₃.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₂₃)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_of_isZero_X₂ (h : IsZero S.X₂) : S.Exact := by
rw [(HomologyData.ofZeros S (IsZero.eq_of_tgt h _ _) (IsZero.eq_of_src h _ _)).exact_iff]
exact h
lemma exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, z₁⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁, z₁⟩
· rintro ⟨h₂, z₂⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h₂, z₂⟩
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff_i_p_zero (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h.left.i ≫ h.right.p = 0 := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
rw [h.left.exact_iff, ← h.comm]
constructor
· intro z
rw [IsZero.eq_of_src z h.iso.hom 0, zero_comp, comp_zero]
· intro eq
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.iso.hom, id_comp, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι,
← cancel_epi h.left.π, eq, zero_comp, comp_zero]
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_i_p_zero [S.HasHomology] (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h₁.i ≫ h₂.p = 0 :=
(HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂).exact_iff_i_p_zero
lemma exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 :=
S.exact_iff_i_p_zero _ _
lemma exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero [S.HasHomology]
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
haveI := HasLeftHomology.hasCokernel S
haveI := HasRightHomology.hasKernel S
exact S.exact_iff_i_p_zero (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
(RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
variable {S}
|
lemma Exact.op (h : S.Exact) : S.op.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.op, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).op⟩⟩
lemma Exact.unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.Exact) : S.unop.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.unop, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).unop⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Exact.lean | 176 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
theorem logb_zero_left : logb 0 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_zero, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_zero_left_eq_zero : logb 0 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_zero_left, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem logb_one_left : logb 1 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_one, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_one_left_eq_zero : logb 1 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_one_left, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
@[simp]
theorem logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x := by
rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
theorem logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
@[simp]
theorem logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b x⁻¹ = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
theorem inv_logb (a b : ℝ) : (logb a b)⁻¹ = logb b a := by simp_rw [logb, inv_div]
theorem inv_logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a * b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_mul h₁ h₂
theorem inv_logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a / b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_div h₁ h₂
theorem logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a * b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_mul_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a / b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_div_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem mul_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) (h₃ : b ≠ -1) :
logb a b * logb b c = logb a c := by
unfold logb
rw [mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel₀ (log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)]
theorem div_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ 1) (h₃ : c ≠ -1) :
logb a c / logb b c = logb a b :=
div_div_div_cancel_left' _ _ <| log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem logb_rpow_eq_mul_logb_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : logb b (x ^ y) = y * logb b x := by
rw [logb, log_rpow hx, logb, mul_div_assoc]
theorem logb_pow (b x : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : logb b (x ^ k) = k * logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, log_pow, mul_div_assoc]
section BPosAndNeOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_ne_one : b ≠ 1)
include b_pos b_ne_one
private theorem log_b_ne_zero : log b ≠ 0 := by
have b_ne_zero : b ≠ 0 := by linarith
have b_ne_minus_one : b ≠ -1 := by linarith
simp [b_ne_one, b_ne_zero, b_ne_minus_one]
@[simp]
theorem logb_rpow : logb b (b ^ x) = x := by
rw [logb, div_eq_iff, log_rpow b_pos]
exact log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one
theorem rpow_logb_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ logb b x = |x| := by
apply log_injOn_pos
· simp only [Set.mem_Ioi]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· simp only [abs_pos, mem_Ioi, Ne, hx, not_false_iff]
rw [log_rpow b_pos, logb, log_abs]
field_simp [log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_logb (hx : 0 < x) : b ^ logb b x = x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem rpow_logb_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : b ^ logb b x = -x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem logb_eq_iff_rpow_eq (hy : 0 < y) : logb b y = x ↔ b ^ x = y := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· exact rpow_logb b_pos b_ne_one hy
· exact logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one
theorem surjOn_logb : SurjOn (logb b) (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨b ^ x, rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
theorem logb_surjective : Surjective (logb b) := fun x => ⟨b ^ x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_logb : range (logb b) = univ :=
(logb_surjective b_pos b_ne_one).range_eq
theorem surjOn_logb' : SurjOn (logb b) (Iio 0) univ := by
intro x _
use -b ^ x
constructor
· simp only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Set.mem_Iio]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· rw [logb_neg_eq_logb, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one]
end BPosAndNeOne
section OneLtB
variable (hb : 1 < b)
include hb
private theorem b_pos : 0 < b := by linarith
-- Name has a prime added to avoid clashing with `b_ne_one` further down the file
private theorem b_ne_one' : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb), log_le_log_iff h h₁]
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_le (h : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y :=
(logb_le_logb hb h (by linarith)).mpr hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_lt_logb (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b x < logb b y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : logb b x < logb b y ↔ x < y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hx hy
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ x < b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ b ^ x ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ b ^ x < y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
theorem logb_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b]
rw [logb_lt_logb_iff hb zero_lt_one hx]
theorem logb_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff hb (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
exact hx
theorem logb_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← logb_one]
exact logb_lt_logb_iff hb h zero_lt_one
theorem logb_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff hb h0).2 h1
theorem logb_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff hb hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ logb b x :=
(logb_nonneg_iff hb (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem logb_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff hb hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact logb_nonpos_iff hb hx
theorem logb_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : logb b x ≤ 0 :=
(logb_nonpos_iff' hb hx).2 h'x
theorem strictMonoOn_logb : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb hb hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_logb : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb hb (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem logb_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictMonoOn_logb hb).injOn
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos hb (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
theorem logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero hb hx_pos) hx
theorem tendsto_logb_atTop : Tendsto (logb b) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.atTop_div_const (log_pos hb) tendsto_log_atTop
end OneLtB
section BPosAndBLtOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_lt_one : b < 1)
include b_lt_one
private theorem b_ne_one : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
include b_pos
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one), log_le_log_iff h₁ h]
theorem logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b y < logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
logb b x < logb b y ↔ y < x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hy hx
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ b ^ y ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ b ^ y < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ y < b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
theorem logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one zero_lt_one hx]
theorem logb_pos_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x < 1) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
theorem logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one h zero_lt_one]
theorem logb_neg_of_base_lt_one (h1 : 1 < x) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (lt_trans zero_lt_one h1)).2 h1
theorem logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) : 0 ≤ logb b x := by
rw [logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
theorem logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
theorem strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx hxy
theorem strictMonoOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one).injOn
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one)
| (h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 336 | 337 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, we then define `NormedLatticeAddCommGroup` as a
lattice with a covariant normed group addition satisfying the solid axiom.
## Main statements
We show that a normed lattice ordered group is a topological lattice with respect to the norm
topology.
## References
* [Meyer-Nieberg, Banach lattices][MeyerNieberg1991]
## Tags
normed, lattice, ordered, group
-/
/-!
### Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, this section introduces normed lattice ordered groups.
-/
section SolidNorm
/-- Let `α` be an `AddCommGroup` with a `Lattice` structure. A norm on `α` is *solid* if, for `a`
and `b` in `α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`.
-/
class HasSolidNorm (α : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] : Prop where
solid : ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, |x| ≤ |y| → ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α]
theorem norm_le_norm_of_abs_le_abs {a b : α} (h : |a| ≤ |b|) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ :=
HasSolidNorm.solid h
/-- If `α` has a solid norm, then the balls centered at the origin of `α` are solid sets. -/
theorem LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.isSolid_ball (r : ℝ) :
LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.IsSolid (Metric.ball (0 : α) r) := fun _ hx _ hxy =>
mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr ((HasSolidNorm.solid hxy).trans_lt (mem_ball_zero_iff.mp hx))
instance : HasSolidNorm ℝ := ⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : HasSolidNorm ℚ := ⟨fun _ _ _ => by simpa only [norm, ← Rat.cast_abs, Rat.cast_le]⟩
end SolidNorm
/--
Let `α` be a normed commutative group equipped with a partial order covariant with addition, with
respect which `α` forms a lattice. Suppose that `α` is *solid*, that is to say, for `a` and `b` in
`α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`. Then `α` is
said to be a normed lattice ordered group.
-/
@[deprecated
"Use `[NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure NormedLatticeAddCommGroup (α : Type*) extends
NormedAddCommGroup α, Lattice α, HasSolidNorm α where
add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
instance Int.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℤ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Int.norm_cast_real, ← Int.cast_abs] using h
instance Rat.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℚ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Rat.norm_cast_real, ← Rat.cast_abs] using h
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
open HasSolidNorm
theorem dual_solid (a b : α) (h : b ⊓ -b ≤ a ⊓ -a) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ := by
apply solid
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg a]
rw [← neg_inf]
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg b]
rwa [← neg_inf, neg_le_neg_iff, inf_comm _ b, inf_comm _ a]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group, then the order dual is also a
normed lattice ordered group.
-/
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.instHasSolidNorm :
HasSolidNorm αᵒᵈ :=
{ solid := dual_solid (α := α) }
theorem norm_abs_eq_norm (a : α) : ‖|a|‖ = ‖a‖ :=
(solid (abs_abs a).le).antisymm (solid (abs_abs a).symm.le)
theorem norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| = |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b + (c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b| + |c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [inf_comm c, inf_comm c]
exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_sup_sub_sup_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| = |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b + (c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b| + |c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [sup_comm c, sup_comm c]
exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_inf_le_add (x y : α) : ‖x ⊓ y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
have h : ‖x ⊓ y - 0 ⊓ 0‖ ≤ ‖x - 0‖ + ‖y - 0‖ := norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm x y 0 0
simpa only [inf_idem, sub_zero] using h
theorem norm_sup_le_add (x y : α) : ‖x ⊔ y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
have h : ‖x ⊔ y - 0 ⊔ 0‖ ≤ ‖x - 0‖ + ‖y - 0‖ := norm_sup_sub_sup_le_add_norm x y 0 0
simpa only [sup_idem, sub_zero] using h
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group. Then the infimum is jointly continuous.
-/
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.continuousInf : ContinuousInf α := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun q => tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero.2 <| ?_⟩
have : ∀ p : α × α, ‖p.1 ⊓ p.2 - q.1 ⊓ q.2‖ ≤ ‖p.1 - q.1‖ + ‖p.2 - q.2‖ := fun _ =>
norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm _ _ _ _
refine squeeze_zero (fun e => norm_nonneg _) this ?_
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto q).sub <| tendsto_const_nhds).norm.add
((continuous_snd.tendsto q).sub <| tendsto_const_nhds).norm
simp
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.continuousSup {α : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] : ContinuousSup α :=
OrderDual.continuousSup αᵒᵈ
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/--
Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group. Then `α` is a topological lattice in the norm topology.
-/
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.toTopologicalLattice : TopologicalLattice α :=
TopologicalLattice.mk
theorem norm_abs_sub_abs (a b : α) : ‖|a| - |b|‖ ≤ ‖a - b‖ := solid (abs_abs_sub_abs_le _ _)
theorem norm_sup_sub_sup_le_norm (x y z : α) : ‖x ⊔ z - y ⊔ z‖ ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
solid (abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs x y z)
theorem norm_inf_sub_inf_le_norm (x y z : α) : ‖x ⊓ z - y ⊓ z‖ ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
solid (abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs x y z)
theorem lipschitzWith_sup_right (z : α) : LipschitzWith 1 fun x => x ⊔ z :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
exact norm_sup_sub_sup_le_norm x y z
lemma lipschitzWith_posPart : LipschitzWith 1 (posPart : α → α) :=
lipschitzWith_sup_right 0
lemma lipschitzWith_negPart : LipschitzWith 1 (negPart : α → α) := by
simpa [Function.comp] using lipschitzWith_posPart.comp LipschitzWith.id.neg
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_posPart : Continuous (posPart : α → α) := lipschitzWith_posPart.continuous
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_negPart : Continuous (negPart : α → α) := lipschitzWith_negPart.continuous
lemma isClosed_nonneg : IsClosed {x : α | 0 ≤ x} := by
have : {x : α | 0 ≤ x} = negPart ⁻¹' {0} := by ext; simp [negPart_eq_zero]
rw [this]
exact isClosed_singleton.preimage continuous_negPart
theorem isClosed_le_of_isClosed_nonneg {G}
[AddCommGroup G] [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousSub G] (h : IsClosed { x : G | 0 ≤ x }) :
IsClosed { p : G × G | p.fst ≤ p.snd } := by
have : { p : G × G | p.fst ≤ p.snd } = (fun p : G × G => p.snd - p.fst) ⁻¹' { x : G | 0 ≤ x } :=
by ext1 p; simp only [sub_nonneg, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
rw [this]
exact IsClosed.preimage (continuous_snd.sub continuous_fst) h
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.orderClosedTopology {E}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [Lattice E] [HasSolidNorm E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] :
OrderClosedTopology E :=
⟨isClosed_le_of_isClosed_nonneg isClosed_nonneg⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/Lattice.lean | 215 | 218 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
/-!
# Cauchy sequences and big operators
This file proves some more lemmas about basic Cauchy sequences that involve finite sums.
-/
open Finset IsAbsoluteValue
namespace IsCauSeq
variable {α β : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{f g : ℕ → β} {a : ℕ → α}
lemma of_abv_le (n : ℕ) (hm : ∀ m, n ≤ m → abv (f m) ≤ a m) :
IsCauSeq abs (fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, a i) → IsCauSeq abv fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i := by
intro hg ε ε0
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg (ε / 2) (div_pos ε0 (by norm_num))
exists max n i
intro j ji
have hi₁ := hi j (le_trans (le_max_right n i) ji)
have hi₂ := hi (max n i) (le_max_right n i)
have sub_le :=
abs_sub_le (∑ k ∈ range j, a k) (∑ k ∈ range i, a k) (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k)
have := add_lt_add hi₁ hi₂
rw [abs_sub_comm (∑ k ∈ range (max n i), a k), add_halves ε] at this
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (le_trans ?_ (le_abs_self _)) sub_le) this
generalize hk : j - max n i = k
clear this hi₂ hi₁ hi ε0 ε hg sub_le
rw [tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le ji] at hk
rw [hk]
dsimp only
clear hk ji j
induction' k with k' hi
· simp [abv_zero abv]
simp only [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Finset.sum_range_succ_comm]
simp only [add_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at hi
exact add_le_add (hm _ (le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (Nat.zero_le _) (le_max_left _ _))) hi
lemma of_abv (hf : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n)) :
IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, f n :=
hf.of_abv_le 0 fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl
theorem _root_.cauchy_product (ha : IsCauSeq abs fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, abv (f n))
(hb : IsCauSeq abv fun m ↦ ∑ n ∈ range m, g n) (ε : α) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i : ℕ, ∀ j ≥ i,
abv ((∑ k ∈ range j, f k) * ∑ k ∈ range j, g k -
∑ n ∈ range j, ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), f m * g (n - m)) < ε := by
let ⟨P, hP⟩ := ha.bounded
let ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := hb.bounded
have hP0 : 0 < P := lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (hP 0)
have hPε0 : 0 < ε / (2 * P) := div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (2 : α) > 0 by norm_num) hP0)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := hb.cauchy₂ hPε0
have hQε0 : 0 < ε / (4 * Q) :=
div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (0 : α) < 4 by norm_num) (lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)))
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := ha.cauchy₂ hQε0
refine ⟨2 * (max N M + 1), fun K hK ↦ ?_⟩
have h₁ :
(∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ k ∈ range (m + 1), f k * g (m - k)) =
∑ m ∈ range K, ∑ n ∈ range (K - m), f m * g n := by
simpa using sum_range_diag_flip K fun m n ↦ f m * g n
have h₂ :
(fun i ↦ ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), f i * g k) = fun i ↦ f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k := by
simp [Finset.mul_sum]
have h₃ :
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k =
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * (∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k) +
∑ i ∈ range K, f i * ∑ k ∈ range K, g k := by
rw [← sum_add_distrib]; simp [(mul_add _ _ _).symm]
have two_mul_two : (4 : α) = 2 * 2 := by norm_num
have hQ0 : Q ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by simp [h, lt_irrefl] at hQε0
have h2Q0 : 2 * Q ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero hQ0
have hε : ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) = ε := by
rw [← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hP0)), two_mul_two, mul_assoc, ← div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ h2Q0, add_halves]
have hNMK : max N M + 1 < K :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by rw [two_mul]; exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (Nat.succ_pos _)) hK
have hKN : N < K :=
calc
N ≤ max N M := le_max_left _ _
_ < max N M + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
_ < K := hNMK
have hsumlesum :
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f i) * (ε / (2 * P)) := by
gcongr with m hmJ
refine le_of_lt <| hN (K - m) (le_tsub_of_add_le_left <| hK.trans' ?_) K hKN.le
rw [two_mul]
gcongr
· exact (mem_range.1 hmJ).le
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_left _ _)
have hsumltP : (∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) < P :=
calc
(∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)) = |∑ n ∈ range (max N M + 1), abv (f n)| :=
Eq.symm (abs_of_nonneg (sum_nonneg fun x _ ↦ abv_nonneg abv (f x)))
_ < P := hP (max N M + 1)
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, sum_mul, ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub, abv_neg abv]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _) ?_
suffices
(∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) +
((∑ i ∈ range K, abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) -
∑ i ∈ range (max N M + 1),
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) <
ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) by
rw [hε] at this
simpa [abv_mul abv] using this
gcongr
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt hsumlesum
(by rw [← sum_mul, mul_comm]; gcongr)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
calc
(∑ i ∈ range K with max N M + 1 ≤ i,
abv (f i) * abv ((∑ k ∈ range (K - i), g k) - ∑ k ∈ range K, g k)) ≤
∑ i ∈ range K with max N M + 1 ≤ i, abv (f i) * (2 * Q) := by
gcongr
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) ?_
rw [two_mul, abv_neg abv]
gcongr <;> exact le_of_lt (hQ _)
_ < ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) := by
rw [← sum_mul, ← sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)]
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0)
gcongr
exact (le_abs_self _).trans_lt <|
hM _ ((Nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_right _ _)).trans hNMK.le) _ <|
Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _
variable [Archimedean α]
lemma of_decreasing_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, |f n| ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n.succ ≤ f n) : IsCauSeq abs f := fun ε ε0 ↦ by
classical
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Archimedean.arch a ε0
have h : ∃ l, ∀ n ≥ m, a - l • ε < f n :=
⟨k + k + 1, fun n hnm ↦
lt_of_lt_of_le (show a - (k + (k + 1)) • ε < -|f n| from
lt_neg.1 <| (ham n hnm).trans_lt
(by
rw [neg_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt, add_nsmul, add_nsmul, one_nsmul]
exact add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hk (lt_of_le_of_lt hk (lt_add_of_pos_right _ ε0))))
(neg_le.2 <| abs_neg (f n) ▸ le_abs_self _)⟩
let l := Nat.find h
have hl : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≥ m → f n > a - l • ε := Nat.find_spec h
have hl0 : l ≠ 0 := fun hl0 ↦
not_lt_of_ge (ham m le_rfl)
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by have := hl m (le_refl m); simpa [hl0] using this) (le_abs_self (f m)))
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.1 (Nat.find_min h (Nat.pred_lt hl0))
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_lt] at hi
exists i
intro j hj
have hfij : f j ≤ f i := (Nat.rel_of_forall_rel_succ_of_le_of_le (· ≥ ·) hnm hi.1 hj).le
rw [abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 hfij), neg_sub, sub_lt_iff_lt_add']
calc
f i ≤ a - Nat.pred l • ε := hi.2
_ = a - l • ε + ε := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hl0), succ_nsmul, sub_add,
add_sub_cancel_right]
_ < f j + ε := add_lt_add_right (hl j (le_trans hi.1 hj)) _
lemma of_mono_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, |f n| ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n ≤ f n.succ) : IsCauSeq abs f :=
(of_decreasing_bounded (-f) (a := a) (m := m) (by simpa using ham) <| by simpa using hnm).of_neg
| lemma geo_series [Nontrivial β] (x : β) (hx1 : abv x < 1) :
IsCauSeq abv fun n ↦ ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m := by
have hx1' : abv x ≠ 1 := fun h ↦ by simp [h, lt_irrefl] at hx1
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/BigOperators.lean | 179 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Rev
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
## Main declarations
There are three (main) ways to consider `Fin n` as a subtype of `Fin (n + 1)`, hence three (main)
ways to move between tuples of length `n` and of length `n + 1` by adding/removing an entry.
### Adding at the start
* `Fin.succ`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function for
all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `0` and for `i.succ` for all `i : Fin n`.
This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cons`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.cons a f : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the start. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ` and `a : α 0`. This is a special case of
`Fin.cases`.
* `Fin.tail`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.tail f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.tail f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ`.
### Adding at the end
* `Fin.castSucc`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.lastCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function
for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `last n` and for `i.castSucc` for all
`i : Fin n`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.snoc`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the end. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc` and `a : α (last n)`. This is a
special case of `Fin.lastCases`.
* `Fin.init`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.init f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.init f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc`.
### Adding in the middle
For a **pivot** `p : Fin (n + 1)`,
* `Fin.succAbove`: Send `i : Fin n` to
* `i : Fin (n + 1)` if `i < p`,
* `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)` if `p ≤ i`.
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a
function for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `p` and for `p.succAbove i`
for all `i : Fin n`.
* `Fin.insertNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.insertNth f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` in position `p`. In general, tuples can be
dependent functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (p.succAbove i)` and `a : α p`. This is a
special case of `Fin.succAboveCases`.
* `Fin.removeNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.removeNth p f : Fin n → α`
by forgetting the `p`-th value. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.removeNth f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (succAbove p i)`.
`p = 0` means we add at the start. `p = last n` means we add at the end.
### Miscellaneous
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Sort*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_of_ne h', update_of_ne this, cons_succ]
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the first element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.cons` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def consEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α 0 × (∀ i, α (succ i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := cons f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f 0, tail f)
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Sort*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => consCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail]
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
theorem comp_cons {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
theorem comp_tail {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
end Preorder
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
section Append
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
@[simp]
theorem append_left (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
@[simp]
theorem append_right (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
theorem append_right_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_left_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (i.cast (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
theorem append_castAdd_natAdd {f : Fin (m + n) → α} :
append (fun i ↦ f (castAdd n i)) (fun i ↦ f (natAdd m i)) = f := by
unfold append addCases
simp
end Append
section Repeat
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
def «repeat» (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (x.cast (Nat.zero_mul _)).elim0
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
theorem repeat_succ (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ Fin.cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
theorem repeat_rev (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (i : Fin n) (y : α i.castSucc) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α i.castSucc :=
q i.castSucc
theorem init_def {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.castSucc :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x i.castSucc = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {α : Sort*} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
lemma snoc_zero {α : Sort*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Sort*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α i.castSucc)
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (snoc_cast_add _ _)
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.castSucc y := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases with
| cast j => rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
| last => simp [Ne.symm]
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases <;> simp
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.snoc` is injective. -/
theorem snoc_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@snoc n α) := fun x y xₙ yₙ h ↦
⟨funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (castSucc i), by simpa using congr_fun h (last n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem snoc_inj {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc} {xₙ yₙ : α (last n)} :
snoc x xₙ = snoc y yₙ ↔ x = y ∧ xₙ = yₙ :=
snoc_injective2.eq_iff
theorem snoc_right_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) :
Function.Injective (snoc x) :=
snoc_injective2.right _
theorem snoc_left_injective (xₙ : α (last n)) : Function.Injective (snoc · xₙ) :=
snoc_injective2.left _
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp only [init, snoc, h, cast_eq, dite_true, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q := by
ext j
simp [init, Fin.ne_of_lt]
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_castSucc : init (update q i.castSucc y) = update (init q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [init]
· simp [init, h, castSucc_inj]
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Sort*} (q : Fin (n + 2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) := by
ext i
simp [tail, init, castSucc_fin_succ]
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Sort*} (a : β) (q : Fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (fun _ ↦ β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = 0
· simp [h, snoc, castLT]
set j := pred i h with ji
have : i = j.succ := by rw [ji, succ_pred]
rw [this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j.val < n
· set k := castLT j h' with jk
have : j = castSucc k := by rw [jk, castSucc_castLT]
rw [this, ← castSucc_fin_succ, snoc]
simp [pred, snoc, cons]
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last]
simp
theorem comp_snoc {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ snoc q y = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp [h, snoc, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the right is the same as `Fin.snoc`. -/
theorem append_right_eq_snoc {α : Sort*} {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) :
Fin.append x x₀ = Fin.snoc x (x₀ 0) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_left]
exact (@snoc_castSucc _ (fun _ => α) _ _ i).symm
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_right]
exact (@snoc_last _ (fun _ => α) _ _).symm
/-- `Fin.snoc` is the same as appending a one-tuple -/
theorem snoc_eq_append {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) :
snoc xs x = append xs (cons x Fin.elim0) :=
(append_right_eq_snoc xs (cons x Fin.elim0)).symm
theorem append_left_snoc {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs x) ys =
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons x ys) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..) := by
rw [snoc_eq_append, append_assoc, append_left_eq_cons, append_cast_right]; rfl
theorem append_right_cons {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (y : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons y ys) =
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs y) ys ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..).symm := by
rw [append_left_snoc]; rfl
theorem append_cons {α : Sort*} (a : α) (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (cons a as) bs
= cons a (Fin.append as bs) ∘ (Fin.cast <| Nat.add_right_comm n 1 m) := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, -⟩
simp only [append, addCases, cons, castLT, cast, comp_apply]
rcases i with - | i
· simp
· split_ifs with h
· have : i < n := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [addCases, this]
· have : ¬i < n := Nat.not_le.mpr <| Nat.lt_succ.mp <| Nat.not_le.mp h
simp [addCases, this]
theorem append_snoc {α : Sort*} (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) (b : α) :
Fin.append as (snoc bs b) = snoc (Fin.append as bs) b := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, isLt⟩
simp only [append, addCases, castLT, cast_mk, subNat_mk, natAdd_mk, cast, snoc.eq_1,
cast_eq, eq_rec_constant, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, castLT_mk]
split_ifs with lt_n lt_add sub_lt nlt_add lt_add <;> (try rfl)
· have := Nat.lt_add_right m lt_n
contradiction
· obtain rfl := Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (Nat.not_lt.mp nlt_add) isLt
simp [Nat.add_comm n m] at sub_lt
· have := Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (Nat.not_lt.mp lt_n) lt_add
contradiction
theorem comp_init {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ init q = init (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [init]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the last element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.snoc` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def snocEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α (last n) × (∀ i, α (castSucc i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f _ := Fin.snoc f.2 f.1 _
invFun f := ⟨f _, Fin.init f⟩
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it its initial `n`-tuple and its last element. -/
@[elab_as_elim, inline]
def snocCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort*}
(h : ∀ xs x, P (Fin.snoc xs x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [Fin.snoc_init_self]) <| h (Fin.init x) (x <| Fin.last _)
@[simp] lemma snocCases_snoc
{P : (∀ i : Fin (n+1), α i) → Sort*} (h : ∀ x x₀, P (Fin.snoc x x₀))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n, (Fin.init α) i) (x₀ : α (Fin.last _)) :
snocCases h (Fin.snoc x x₀) = h x x₀ := by
rw [snocCases, cast_eq_iff_heq, Fin.init_snoc, Fin.snoc_last]
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.snoc`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def snocInduction {α : Sort*}
{P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort*}
(h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀), P x → P (Fin.snoc x x₀)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => snocCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| snocInduction h0 h _) x
end TupleRight
section InsertNth
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {β : Sort*}
/- Porting note: Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
/-- Define a function on `Fin (n + 1)` from a value on `i : Fin (n + 1)` and values on each
`Fin.succAbove i j`, `j : Fin n`. This version is elaborated as eliminator and works for
propositions, see also `Fin.insertNth` for a version without an `@[elab_as_elim]`
attribute. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def succAboveCases {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) : α j :=
if hj : j = i then Eq.rec x hj.symm
else
if hlt : j < i then @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hlt) (p _)
else @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ <|
(Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne hj).resolve_left hlt) (p _)
-- This is a duplicate of `Fin.exists_fin_succ` in Core. We should upstream the name change.
alias forall_iff_succ := forall_fin_succ
-- This is a duplicate of `Fin.exists_fin_succ` in Core. We should upstream the name change.
alias exists_iff_succ := exists_fin_succ
lemma forall_iff_castSucc {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P (last n) ∧ ∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ lastCases h.1 h.2⟩
lemma exists_iff_castSucc {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P (last n) ∨ ∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc where
mp := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
induction' i using lastCases
· exact .inl hi
· exact .inr ⟨_, hi⟩
mpr := by rintro (h | ⟨i, hi⟩) <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩
theorem forall_iff_succAbove {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P p ∧ ∀ i, P (p.succAbove i) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ succAboveCases p h.1 h.2⟩
lemma exists_iff_succAbove {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P p ∨ ∃ i, P (p.succAbove i) where
mp := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
induction' i using p.succAboveCases
· exact .inl hi
· exact .inr ⟨_, hi⟩
mpr := by rintro (h | ⟨i, hi⟩) <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩
/-- Analogue of `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ` for `succAbove`. -/
theorem eq_self_or_eq_succAbove (p i : Fin (n + 1)) : i = p ∨ ∃ j, i = p.succAbove j :=
succAboveCases p (.inl rfl) (fun j => .inr ⟨j, rfl⟩) i
/-- Remove the `p`-th entry of a tuple. -/
def removeNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (f : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i) := fun i ↦ f (p.succAbove i)
/-- Insert an element into a tuple at a given position. For `i = 0` see `Fin.cons`,
for `i = Fin.last n` see `Fin.snoc`. See also `Fin.succAboveCases` for a version elaborated
as an eliminator. -/
def insertNth (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
α j :=
succAboveCases i x p j
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_same (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
insertNth i x p i = x := by simp [insertNth, succAboveCases]
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j))
(j : Fin n) : insertNth i x p (i.succAbove j) = p j := by
simp only [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (succAbove_ne _ _), succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt]
split_ifs with hlt
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : castPred ((succAbove i) j) H₁ = k
rw [castPred_succAbove _ _ hlt] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
· generalize_proofs H₀ H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : pred (succAbove i j) H₁ = k
rw [pred_succAbove _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 hlt)] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
@[simp]
theorem succAbove_cases_eq_insertNth : @succAboveCases = @insertNth :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma removeNth_insertNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (a : α p) (f : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)) :
removeNth p (insertNth p a f) = f := by ext; unfold removeNth; simp
@[simp] lemma removeNth_zero (f : ∀ i, α i) : removeNth 0 f = tail f := by
ext; simp [tail, removeNth]
@[simp] lemma removeNth_last {α : Type*} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) : removeNth (last n) f = init f := by
ext; simp [init, removeNth]
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_comp_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) :
insertNth i x p ∘ i.succAbove = p :=
funext (insertNth_apply_succAbove i _ _)
theorem insertNth_eq_iff {p : Fin (n + 1)} {a : α p} {f : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)} {g : ∀ j, α j} :
insertNth p a f = g ↔ a = g p ∧ f = removeNth p g := by
simp [funext_iff, forall_iff_succAbove p, removeNth]
theorem eq_insertNth_iff {p : Fin (n + 1)} {a : α p} {f : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)} {g : ∀ j, α j} :
g = insertNth p a f ↔ g p = a ∧ removeNth p g = f := by
simpa [eq_comm] using insertNth_eq_iff
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.insertNth` is injective. -/
theorem insertNth_injective2 {p : Fin (n + 1)} :
Function.Injective2 (@insertNth n α p) := fun xₚ yₚ x y h ↦
⟨by simpa using congr_fun h p, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (succAbove p i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_inj {p : Fin (n + 1)} {x y : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)} {xₚ yₚ : α p} :
insertNth p xₚ x = insertNth p yₚ y ↔ xₚ = yₚ ∧ x = y :=
insertNth_injective2.eq_iff
theorem insertNth_left_injective {p : Fin (n + 1)} (x : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)) :
Function.Injective (insertNth p · x) :=
insertNth_injective2.left _
theorem insertNth_right_injective {p : Fin (n + 1)} (x : α p) :
Function.Injective (insertNth p x) :=
insertNth_injective2.right _
/- Porting note: Once again, Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
theorem insertNth_apply_below {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j < i) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ k, α (i.succAbove k)) :
i.insertNth x p j = @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _
(succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h) (p <| j.castPred _) := by
rw [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (Fin.ne_of_lt h), dif_pos h]
/- Porting note: Once again, Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
theorem insertNth_apply_above {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ k, α (i.succAbove k)) :
i.insertNth x p j = @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _
(succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h) (p <| j.pred _) := by
rw [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (Fin.ne_of_gt h), dif_neg (Fin.lt_asymm h)]
theorem insertNth_zero (x : α 0) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (succAbove 0 j)) :
insertNth 0 x p =
cons x fun j ↦ _root_.cast (congr_arg α (congr_fun succAbove_zero j)) (p j) := by
refine insertNth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, ?_⟩
ext j
convert (cons_succ x p j).symm
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_zero' (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) : @insertNth _ (fun _ ↦ β) 0 x p = cons x p := by
simp [insertNth_zero]
theorem insertNth_last (x : α (last n)) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α ((last n).succAbove j)) :
insertNth (last n) x p =
snoc (fun j ↦ _root_.cast (congr_arg α (succAbove_last_apply j)) (p j)) x := by
refine insertNth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, ?_⟩
ext j
apply eq_of_heq
trans snoc (fun j ↦ _root_.cast (congr_arg α (succAbove_last_apply j)) (p j)) x j.castSucc
· rw [snoc_castSucc]
exact (cast_heq _ _).symm
· apply congr_arg_heq
rw [succAbove_last]
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_last' (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) :
@insertNth _ (fun _ ↦ β) (last n) x p = snoc p x := by simp [insertNth_last]
lemma insertNth_rev {α : Sort*} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
insertNth (α := fun _ ↦ α) i a f (rev j) = insertNth (α := fun _ ↦ α) i.rev a (f ∘ rev) j := by
induction j using Fin.succAboveCases
· exact rev i
· simp
· simp [rev_succAbove]
theorem insertNth_comp_rev {α} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α) (p : Fin n → α) :
(Fin.insertNth i x p) ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.insertNth (Fin.rev i) x (p ∘ Fin.rev) := by
funext x
apply insertNth_rev
theorem cons_rev {α n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) (i : Fin <| n + 1) :
cons (α := fun _ => α) a f i.rev = snoc (α := fun _ => α) (f ∘ Fin.rev : Fin _ → α) a i := by
simpa using insertNth_rev 0 a f i
theorem cons_comp_rev {α n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) :
Fin.cons a f ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.snoc (f ∘ Fin.rev) a := by
funext i; exact cons_rev ..
theorem snoc_rev {α n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) (i : Fin <| n + 1) :
snoc (α := fun _ => α) f a i.rev = cons (α := fun _ => α) a (f ∘ Fin.rev : Fin _ → α) i := by
simpa using insertNth_rev (last n) a f i
theorem snoc_comp_rev {α n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) :
Fin.snoc f a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.cons a (f ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| snoc_rev a f
theorem insertNth_binop (op : ∀ j, α j → α j → α j) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x y : α i)
(p q : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
(i.insertNth (op i x y) fun j ↦ op _ (p j) (q j)) = fun j ↦
op j (i.insertNth x p j) (i.insertNth y q j) :=
insertNth_eq_iff.2 <| by unfold removeNth; simp
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)]
theorem insertNth_le_iff {i : Fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)} {q : ∀ j, α j} :
i.insertNth x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q i ∧ p ≤ fun j ↦ q (i.succAbove j) := by
simp [Pi.le_def, forall_iff_succAbove i]
theorem le_insertNth_iff {i : Fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)} {q : ∀ j, α j} :
q ≤ i.insertNth x p ↔ q i ≤ x ∧ (fun j ↦ q (i.succAbove j)) ≤ p := by
simp [Pi.le_def, forall_iff_succAbove i]
end Preorder
open Set
@[simp] lemma removeNth_update (p : Fin (n + 1)) (x) (f : ∀ j, α j) :
removeNth p (update f p x) = removeNth p f := by ext i; simp [removeNth, succAbove_ne]
@[simp] lemma insertNth_removeNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (x) (f : ∀ j, α j) :
insertNth p x (removeNth p f) = update f p x := by simp [Fin.insertNth_eq_iff]
lemma insertNth_self_removeNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (f : ∀ j, α j) :
insertNth p (f p) (removeNth p f) = f := by simp
@[simp]
theorem update_insertNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (x y : α p) (f : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)) :
update (p.insertNth x f) p y = p.insertNth y f := by
ext i
cases i using p.succAboveCases <;> simp [succAbove_ne]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the `p`-th element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.insertNth` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def insertNthEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
α p × (∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := insertNth p f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f p, removeNth p f)
left_inv f := by ext <;> simp
right_inv f := by simp
@[simp] lemma insertNthEquiv_zero (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : insertNthEquiv α 0 = consEquiv α :=
Equiv.symm_bijective.injective <| by ext <;> rfl
/-- Note this lemma can only be written about non-dependent tuples as `insertNth (last n) = snoc` is
not a definitional equality. -/
@[simp] lemma insertNthEquiv_last (n : ℕ) (α : Type*) :
insertNthEquiv (fun _ ↦ α) (last n) = snocEquiv (fun _ ↦ α) := by ext; simp
end InsertNth
section Find
/-- `find p` returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied. -/
def find : ∀ {n : ℕ} (p : Fin n → Prop) [DecidablePred p], Option (Fin n)
| 0, _p, _ => none
| n + 1, p, _ => by
exact
| Option.casesOn (@find n (fun i ↦ p (i.castLT (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2))) _)
(if _ : p (Fin.last n) then some (Fin.last n) else none) fun i ↦
some (i.castLT (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt i.2))
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 991 | 993 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
theorem of_mul_ratCast (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_rat := of_mul_ratCast
theorem mul_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_ratCast q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq, cast_one, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_rat := mul_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_ratCast q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_mul := of_ratCast_mul
theorem ratCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_ratCast hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_mul := ratCast_mul
theorem of_mul_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_ratCast m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_int := of_mul_intCast
theorem of_intCast_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_mul := of_intCast_mul
theorem mul_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
| rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_int := mul_intCast
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 366 | 370 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convolution
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.EulerSineProd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
/-!
# The Beta function, and further properties of the Gamma function
In this file we define the Beta integral, relate Beta and Gamma functions, and prove some
refined properties of the Gamma function using these relations.
## Results on the Beta function
* `Complex.betaIntegral`: the Beta function `Β(u, v)`, where `u`, `v` are complex with positive
real part.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`: the formula
`Gamma u * Gamma v = Gamma (u + v) * betaIntegral u v`.
## Results on the Gamma function
* `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}` we have `Γ s ≠ 0`.
* `Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`: for all `s`, the limit as `n → ∞` of the sequence
`n ↦ n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))` is `Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`: Euler's reflection formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (1 - s) = π / sin π s`.
* `Complex.differentiable_one_div_Gamma`: the function `1 / Γ(s)` is differentiable everywhere.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: Legendre's duplication formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (s + 1 / 2) = Gamma (2 * s) * 2 ^ (1 - 2 * s) * √π`.
* `Real.Gamma_ne_zero`, `Real.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`,
`Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`, `Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: real versions of the above.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat Topology Real
section BetaIntegral
/-! ## The Beta function -/
namespace Complex
/-- The Beta function `Β (u, v)`, defined as `∫ x:ℝ in 0..1, x ^ (u - 1) * (1 - x) ^ (v - 1)`. -/
noncomputable def betaIntegral (u v : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `betaIntegral_convergent`, showing convergence at the left endpoint. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent_left {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (v : ℂ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 (1 / 2) := by
apply IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2)] at hx
apply ContinuousAt.cpow
· exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
· exact continuousAt_const
· norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| by linarith only [hx.2]
/-- The Beta integral is convergent for all `u, v` of positive real part. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 1 := by
refine (betaIntegral_convergent_left hu v).trans ?_
rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg]
convert ((betaIntegral_convergent_left hv u).comp_add_right 1).symm using 1
· ext1 x
conv_lhs => rw [mul_comm]
congr 2 <;> · push_cast; ring
· norm_num
· norm_num
theorem betaIntegral_symm (u v : ℂ) : betaIntegral v u = betaIntegral u v := by
rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_add (a := 0) (b := 1) (c := -1)
(fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) neg_one_lt_zero.ne 1
rw [inv_neg, inv_one, neg_one_smul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_symm] at this
simp? at this says
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_add, ofReal_neg, ofReal_one, sub_add_cancel_right, neg_neg,
mul_one, neg_add_cancel, mul_zero, zero_add] at this
conv_lhs at this => arg 1; intro x; rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
exact this
theorem betaIntegral_eval_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) : betaIntegral u 1 = 1 / u := by
simp_rw [betaIntegral, sub_self, cpow_zero, mul_one]
rw [integral_cpow (Or.inl _)]
· rw [ofReal_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, zero_cpow, sub_zero, sub_add_cancel]
rw [sub_add_cancel]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
· rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← sub_pos, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_cancel]
|
theorem betaIntegral_scaled (s t : ℂ) {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
∫ x in (0)..a, (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * ((a : ℂ) - x) ^ (t - 1) =
(a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) * betaIntegral s t := by
have ha' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha.ne'
rw [betaIntegral]
have A : (a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) = a * ((a : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (a : ℂ) ^ (t - 1)) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean | 105 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ToNat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Finite Cardinality Functions
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`.
* `ENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `ENat.card α = ⊤`.
* `PartENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number
(using the legacy definition `PartENat := Part ℕ`). If `α` is infinite, `PartENat.card α = ⊤`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Cardinal Function
noncomputable section
variable {α β : Type*}
universe u v
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`. -/
protected def card (α : Type*) : ℕ :=
toNat (mk α)
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_fintype_card [Fintype α] : Nat.card α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card
/-- Because this theorem takes `Fintype α` as a non-instance argument, it can be used in particular
when `Fintype.card` ends up with different instance than the one found by inference -/
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_eq_nat_card {_ : Fintype α} : Fintype.card α = Nat.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card.symm
lemma card_eq_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : Nat.card s = s.card := by
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
lemma card_eq_card_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Nat.card s = s.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, s.mem_toFinset]
lemma card_eq_card_finite_toFinset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card s = hs.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, hs.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem card_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Nat.card α = 0 := by simp [Nat.card]
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite α] : Nat.card α = 0 := mk_toNat_of_infinite
lemma cast_card [Finite α] : (Nat.card α : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk α := by
rw [Nat.card, Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0]
exact Cardinal.lt_aleph0_of_finite _
lemma _root_.Set.Infinite.card_eq_zero {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : Nat.card s = 0 :=
@card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype
lemma card_eq_zero : Nat.card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Infinite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
lemma card_ne_zero : Nat.card α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by simp [card_eq_zero, not_or]
lemma card_pos_iff : 0 < Nat.card α ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, mk_lt_aleph0_iff]
@[simp] lemma card_pos [Nonempty α] [Finite α] : 0 < Nat.card α := card_pos_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
theorem finite_of_card_ne_zero (h : Nat.card α ≠ 0) : Finite α := (card_ne_zero.1 h).2
theorem card_congr (f : α ≃ β) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr f
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite β] (f : α → β)
(hf : Injective f) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β := by
simpa using toNat_le_toNat (lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective hf) (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
lemma card_le_card_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite α] (f : α → β)
(hf : Surjective f) : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α := by
have : lift.{u} #β ≤ lift.{v} #α := mk_le_of_surjective (ULift.map_surjective.2 hf)
simpa using toNat_le_toNat this (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Bijective f) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
protected theorem bijective_iff_injective_and_card [Finite β] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Injective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
rw [Bijective, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite β
have := Fintype.ofInjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, ← Bijective,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card]
protected theorem bijective_iff_surjective_and_card [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Surjective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
classical
rw [_root_.and_comm, Bijective, and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofSurjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_left_iff, ← Bijective, ← and_comm,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite β] {f : α → β}
(inj : Injective f) (hc : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_injective_and_card f).mpr
⟨inj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_injective f inj) |>.symm⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite α] {f : α → β}
(surj : Surjective f) (hc : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card f).mpr
⟨surj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_surjective f surj)⟩
theorem card_eq_of_equiv_fin {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (f : α ≃ Fin n) : Nat.card α = n := by
simpa only [card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_fin] using card_congr f
section Set
open Set
variable {s t : Set α}
lemma card_mono (ht : t.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t) : Nat.card s ≤ Nat.card t :=
toNat_le_toNat (mk_le_mk_of_subset h) ht.lt_aleph0
lemma card_image_le {f : α → β} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card (f '' s) ≤ Nat.card s :=
have := hs.to_subtype; card_le_card_of_surjective (imageFactorization f s) surjective_onto_image
lemma card_image_of_injOn {f : α → β} (hf : s.InjOn f) : Nat.card (f '' s) = Nat.card s := by
classical
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := hs.fintype
have := fintypeImage s f
simp_rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Set.card_image_of_inj_on hf]
· have := hs.to_subtype
have := (hs.image hf).to_subtype
simp [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
lemma card_image_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
Nat.card (f '' s) = Nat.card s := card_image_of_injOn hf.injOn
lemma card_image_equiv (e : α ≃ β) : Nat.card (e '' s) = Nat.card s :=
Nat.card_congr (e.image s).symm
lemma card_preimage_of_injOn {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).InjOn f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
Nat.card (f ⁻¹' s) = Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_image_of_injOn hf, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 hsf]
lemma card_preimage_of_injective {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
Nat.card (f ⁻¹' s) = Nat.card s := card_preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn hsf
@[simp] lemma card_univ : Nat.card (univ : Set α) = Nat.card α :=
card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
lemma card_range_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Nat.card (range f) = Nat.card α := by
rw [← Nat.card_preimage_of_injective hf le_rfl]
simp
end Set
/-- If the cardinality is positive, that means it is a finite type, so there is
an equivalence between `α` and `Fin (Nat.card α)`. See also `Finite.equivFin`. -/
def equivFinOfCardPos {α : Type*} (h : Nat.card α ≠ 0) : α ≃ Fin (Nat.card α) := by
cases fintypeOrInfinite α
· simpa only [card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.equivFin α
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at h
theorem card_of_subsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : Nat.card α = 1 := by
letI := Fintype.ofSubsingleton a
rw [card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton a]
theorem card_eq_one_iff_unique : Nat.card α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
Cardinal.toNat_eq_one_iff_unique
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : Nat.card α = 1 := by
simp [card_eq_one_iff_unique, *]
|
theorem card_eq_one_iff_exists : Nat.card α = 1 ↔ ∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y = x := by
rw [card_eq_one_iff_unique]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Finite.lean | 191 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
|
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 321 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_right.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_right : b ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, le_symmDiff_iff_left, disjoint_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_left :
a ∆ b ∆ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ b \ c ⊔ c \ a ∆ b := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ (c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ c ⊓ a ⊓ b) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (c ⊓ a ⊓ b), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ b ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c \ a := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ (b \ (c ⊔ a) ⊔ c \ (b ⊔ a)) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (a ⊓ b ⊓ c), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_assoc : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ (b ∆ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_symmDiff_left, symmDiff_symmDiff_right]
instance symmDiff_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_assoc⟩
theorem symmDiff_left_comm : a ∆ (b ∆ c) = b ∆ (a ∆ c) := by
simp_rw [← symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_right_comm : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ c ∆ b := by simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b ∆ (c ∆ d) = a ∆ c ∆ (b ∆ d) := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left : a ∆ (a ∆ b) = b := by simp [← symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right : b ∆ a ∆ a = b := by simp [symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_self' : a ∆ b ∆ a = b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left]
theorem symmDiff_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ∆ a) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right _
theorem symmDiff_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ∆ ·) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left _
theorem symmDiff_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_left_involutive a)
theorem symmDiff_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_left_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_right_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
variable {a b c}
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_left_inj : a ∆ b = c ∆ b ↔ a = c :=
(symmDiff_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_right_inj : a ∆ b = a ∆ c ↔ b = c :=
(symmDiff_right_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_left : a ∆ b = a ↔ b = ⊥ :=
calc
a ∆ b = a ↔ a ∆ b = a ∆ ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_bot]
_ ↔ b = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_right : a ∆ b = b ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_eq_left]
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_left (ha : Disjoint a c) (hb : Disjoint b c) :
Disjoint (a ∆ b) c := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact (ha.sup_left hb).disjoint_sdiff_left
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_right (ha : Disjoint a b) (hb : Disjoint a c) :
Disjoint a (b ∆ c) :=
(ha.symm.symmDiff_left hb.symm).symm
theorem symmDiff_eq_iff_sdiff_eq (ha : a ≤ c) : a ∆ b = c ↔ c \ a = b := by
rw [← symmDiff_of_le ha]
exact ((symmDiff_right_involutive a).toPerm _).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.trans eq_comm
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
/-! `CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` isn't actually a typeclass, but the lemmas in here are dual to
the `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` ones -/
section CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp_bihimp : a ⇔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b :=
@sup_sdiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_bihimp_sup : Codisjoint (a ⇔ b) (a ⊔ b) :=
@disjoint_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_left : a ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_right : b ⇨ a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_left : a ⇔ b ⇨ a = a ⊔ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_right : a ⇔ b ⇨ b = a ⊔ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_le_iff_left : a ⇔ b ≤ a ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@le_symmDiff_iff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_le_iff_right : a ⇔ b ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@le_symmDiff_iff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_assoc : a ⇔ b ⇔ c = a ⇔ (b ⇔ c) :=
@symmDiff_assoc αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
instance bihimp_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_assoc⟩
theorem bihimp_left_comm : a ⇔ (b ⇔ c) = b ⇔ (a ⇔ c) := by simp_rw [← bihimp_assoc, bihimp_comm]
theorem bihimp_right_comm : a ⇔ b ⇔ c = a ⇔ c ⇔ b := by simp_rw [bihimp_assoc, bihimp_comm]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b ⇔ (c ⇔ d) = a ⇔ c ⇔ (b ⇔ d) := by
simp_rw [bihimp_assoc, bihimp_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left : a ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = b := by simp [← bihimp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_cancel_right : b ⇔ a ⇔ a = b := by simp [bihimp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_self : a ⇔ b ⇔ a = b := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left]
theorem bihimp_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ⇔ a) :=
bihimp_bihimp_cancel_right _
theorem bihimp_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ⇔ ·) :=
bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left _
theorem bihimp_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ⇔ a) :=
@symmDiff_left_injective αᵒᵈ _ _
| theorem bihimp_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ⇔ ·) :=
@symmDiff_right_injective αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem bihimp_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ⇔ a) :=
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 548 | 551 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we prove various lemmas about upper/lower bounds of a set:
monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`,
and provide formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {γ : Type v}
section
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
theorem isLUB_congr (h : upperBounds s = upperBounds t) : IsLUB s a ↔ IsLUB t a := by
rw [IsLUB, IsLUB, h]
theorem isGLB_congr (h : lowerBounds s = lowerBounds t) : IsGLB s a ↔ IsGLB t a := by
rw [IsGLB, IsGLB, h]
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i | hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense hy⟩
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
@[simp] theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
@[simp] theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
@[simp] theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ | h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
@[simp]
theorem NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoTopOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
not_isTop b fun x => hb (mem_univ x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ := NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoBotOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ := NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoTopOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoBotOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoBotOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_isBot a fun _ => hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoTopOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddAbove.insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddAbove s → BddAbove (insert a s) :=
bddAbove_insert.2
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddBelow (insert a s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddBelow_union, bddBelow_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddBelow.insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddBelow s → BddBelow (insert a s) :=
bddBelow_insert.2
protected theorem IsLUB.insert [SemilatticeSup γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLUB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGLB.insert [SemilatticeInf γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGLB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGreatest.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGreatest s b) :
IsGreatest (insert a s) (max a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGreatest_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsLeast.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLeast s b) :
IsLeast (insert a s) (min a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLeast_singleton.union hs
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
upperBounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upperBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, upperBounds_union, upperBounds_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
lowerBounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lowerBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, lowerBounds_union, lowerBounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderTop.bddAbove [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : BddAbove s :=
⟨⊤, fun a _ => OrderTop.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderBot.bddBelow [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : BddBelow s :=
⟨⊥, fun a _ => OrderBot.bot_le a⟩
/-- Sets are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `bddDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hA : BddAbove A := by bddDefault)`. -/
macro "bddDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply OrderTop.bddAbove
| apply OrderBot.bddBelow)
/-!
#### Pair
-/
theorem isLUB_pair [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} : IsLUB {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
isLUB_singleton.insert _
theorem isGLB_pair [SemilatticeInf γ] {a b : γ} : IsGLB {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
isGLB_singleton.insert _
theorem isLeast_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsLeast {a, b} (min a b) :=
isLeast_singleton.insert _
theorem isGreatest_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsGreatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
isGreatest_singleton.insert _
/-!
#### Lower/upper bounds
-/
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_lowerBounds : IsLUB (lowerBounds s) a ↔ IsGLB s a :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ hx => H.2 <| subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s hx, H.1⟩, IsGreatest.isLUB⟩
@[simp]
theorem isGLB_upperBounds : IsGLB (upperBounds s) a ↔ IsLUB s a :=
@isLUB_lowerBounds αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lowerBounds_le_upperBounds (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) :
s.Nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨_, hc⟩ => le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
theorem isGLB_le_isLUB (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lowerBounds_le_upperBounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
theorem isLUB_lt_iff (ha : IsLUB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upperBounds s, c < b :=
⟨fun hb => ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, fun ⟨_, hcs, hcb⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
theorem lt_isGLB_iff (ha : IsGLB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lowerBounds s, b < c :=
isLUB_lt_iff ha.dual
theorem le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB {x y} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ b := hb.1 hx
_ ≤ a := hab
_ ≤ y := ha.1 hy
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem IsLeast.unique (Ha : IsLeast s a) (Hb : IsLeast s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
theorem IsLeast.isLeast_iff_eq (Ha : IsLeast s a) : IsLeast s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsGreatest.unique (Ha : IsGreatest s a) (Hb : IsGreatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
theorem IsGreatest.isGreatest_iff_eq (Ha : IsGreatest s a) : IsGreatest s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsLUB.unique (Ha : IsLUB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) : a = b :=
IsLeast.unique Ha Hb
theorem IsGLB.unique (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsGLB s b) : a = b :=
IsGreatest.unique Ha Hb
theorem Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
le_antisymm (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hx hy) (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hy hx)
theorem isGLB_lt_isLUB_of_ne (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) {x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s)
(Hxy : x ≠ y) : a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lowerBounds_le_upperBounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩, fun hab =>
Hxy <| Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_isLUB_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c := by
simp_rw [← not_le, isLUB_le_iff h, mem_upperBounds, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem isGLB_lt_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff h.dual
theorem IsLUB.exists_between (h : IsLUB s a) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
theorem IsLUB.exists_between' (h : IsLUB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac ▸ hcs⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between (h : IsGLB s a) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between' (h : IsGLB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end LinearOrder
theorem isGreatest_himp [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsGreatest {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} (a ⇨ b) := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds]
theorem isLeast_sdiff [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsLeast {w | a ≤ b ⊔ w} (a \ b) := by
simp [IsLeast, mem_lowerBounds]
theorem isGreatest_compl [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsGreatest {w | Disjoint w a} (aᶜ) := by
simpa only [himp_bot, disjoint_iff_inf_le] using isGreatest_himp a ⊥
theorem isLeast_hnot [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsLeast {w | Codisjoint a w} (￢a) := by
simpa only [CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup] using isLeast_sdiff ⊤ a
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 1,596 | 1,610 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Defs
/-!
# Algebras over commutative semirings
In this file we define associative unital `Algebra`s over commutative (semi)rings.
* algebra homomorphisms `AlgHom` are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom`;
* algebra equivalences `AlgEquiv` are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv`;
* `Subalgebra`s are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra`;
* The category `AlgebraCat R` of `R`-algebras is defined in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Algebra.Basic`.
See the implementation notes for remarks about non-associative and non-unital algebras.
## Main definitions:
* `Algebra R A`: the algebra typeclass.
* `algebraMap R A : R →+* A`: the canonical map from `R` to `A`, as a `RingHom`. This is the
preferred spelling of this map, it is also available as:
* `Algebra.linearMap R A : R →ₗ[R] A`, a `LinearMap`.
* `Algebra.ofId R A : R →ₐ[R] A`, an `AlgHom` (defined in a later file).
## Implementation notes
Given a commutative (semi)ring `R`, there are two ways to define an `R`-algebra structure on a
(possibly noncommutative) (semi)ring `A`:
* By endowing `A` with a morphism of rings `R →+* A` denoted `algebraMap R A` which lands in the
center of `A`.
* By requiring `A` be an `R`-module such that the action associates and commutes with multiplication
as `r • (a₁ * a₂) = (r • a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * (r • a₂)`.
We define `Algebra R A` in a way that subsumes both definitions, by extending `SMul R A` and
requiring that this scalar action `r • x` must agree with left multiplication by the image of the
structure morphism `algebraMap R A r * x`.
As a result, there are two ways to talk about an `R`-algebra `A` when `A` is a semiring:
1. ```lean
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
variable [Algebra R A]
```
2. ```lean
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
```
The first approach implies the second via typeclass search; so any lemma stated with the second set
of arguments will automatically apply to the first set. Typeclass search does not know that the
second approach implies the first, but this can be shown with:
```lean
example {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] : Algebra R A :=
Algebra.ofModule smul_mul_assoc mul_smul_comm
```
The advantage of the first approach is that `algebraMap R A` is available, and `AlgHom R A B` and
`Subalgebra R A` can be used. For concrete `R` and `A`, `algebraMap R A` is often definitionally
convenient.
The advantage of the second approach is that `CommSemiring R`, `Semiring A`, and `Module R A` can
all be relaxed independently; for instance, this allows us to:
* Replace `Semiring A` with `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A` in order to describe non-unital and/or
non-associative algebras.
* Replace `CommSemiring R` and `Module R A` with `CommGroup R'` and `DistribMulAction R' A`,
which when `R' = Rˣ` lets us talk about the "algebra-like" action of `Rˣ` on an
`R`-algebra `A`.
While `AlgHom R A B` cannot be used in the second approach, `NonUnitalAlgHom R A B` still can.
You should always use the first approach when working with associative unital algebras, and mimic
the second approach only when you need to weaken a condition on either `R` or `A`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Finset Module.End
universe u v w u₁ v₁
section Prio
/-- An associative unital `R`-algebra is a semiring `A` equipped with a map into its center `R → A`.
See the implementation notes in this file for discussion of the details of this definition.
-/
class Algebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] extends SMul R A where
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `Algebra` structure.
Use `algebraMap` from the root namespace instead. -/
protected algebraMap : R →+* A
commutes' : ∀ r x, algebraMap r * x = x * algebraMap r
smul_def' : ∀ r x, r • x = algebraMap r * x
end Prio
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `Algebra` structure. -/
def algebraMap (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : R →+* A :=
Algebra.algebraMap
/-- Coercion from a commutative semiring to an algebra over this semiring. -/
@[coe, reducible]
def Algebra.cast {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : R → A :=
algebraMap R A
namespace algebraMap
scoped instance coeHTCT (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
CoeHTCT R A :=
⟨Algebra.cast⟩
section CommSemiringSemiring
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : R) : A) = 0 :=
map_zero (algebraMap R A)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : R) : A) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap R A)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (a : ℕ) : (↑(a : R) : A) = a :=
map_natCast (algebraMap R A) a
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (a b : R) : (↑(a + b : R) : A) = ↑a + ↑b :=
map_add (algebraMap R A) a b
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (a b : R) : (↑(a * b : R) : A) = ↑a * ↑b :=
map_mul (algebraMap R A) a b
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (↑(a ^ n : R) : A) = (a : A) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap R A) _ _
end CommSemiringSemiring
section CommRingRing
variable {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : R) : (↑(-x : R) : A) = -↑x :=
map_neg (algebraMap R A) x
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (a b : R) :
(↑(a - b : R) : A) = ↑a - ↑b :=
map_sub (algebraMap R A) a b
end CommRingRing
end algebraMap
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to the center of a semiring.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev RingHom.toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) : Algebra R S where
smul c x := i c * x
commutes' := h
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
algebraMap := i
-- just simple lemmas for a declaration that is itself primed, no need for docstrings
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem RingHom.smul_toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) (r : R) (s : S) :
let _ := RingHom.toAlgebra' i h
r • s = i r * s := rfl
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) :
@algebraMap R S _ _ (i.toAlgebra' h) = i :=
rfl
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to a commutative semiring.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev RingHom.toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S) : Algebra R S :=
i.toAlgebra' fun _ => mul_comm _
theorem RingHom.smul_toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(r : R) (s : S) :
let _ := RingHom.toAlgebra i
r • s = i r * s := rfl
theorem RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S) :
@algebraMap R S _ _ i.toAlgebra = i :=
rfl
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w} {B : Type*}
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `Module R` structure.
If `(r • 1) * x = x * (r • 1) = r • x` for all `r : R` and `x : A`, then `A` is an `Algebra`
over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev ofModule' [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), r • (1 : A) * x = r • x)
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), x * r • (1 : A) = r • x) : Algebra R A where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun r := r • (1 : A)
map_one' := one_smul _ _
map_mul' r₁ r₂ := by simp only [h₁, mul_smul]
map_zero' := zero_smul _ _
map_add' r₁ r₂ := add_smul r₁ r₂ 1 }
commutes' r x := by simp [h₁, h₂]
smul_def' r x := by simp [h₁]
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `Module R` structure.
If `(r • x) * y = x * (r • y) = r • (x * y)` for all `r : R` and `x y : A`, then `A`
is an `Algebra` over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev ofModule [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), r • x * y = r • (x * y))
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), x * r • y = r • (x * y)) : Algebra R A :=
ofModule' (fun r x => by rw [h₁, one_mul]) fun r x => by rw [h₂, mul_one]
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
-- We'll later use this to show `Algebra ℤ M` is a subsingleton.
/-- To prove two algebra structures on a fixed `[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]` agree,
it suffices to check the `algebraMap`s agree.
-/
@[ext]
theorem algebra_ext {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {A : Type*} [Semiring A] (P Q : Algebra R A)
(h : ∀ r : R, (haveI := P; algebraMap R A r) = haveI := Q; algebraMap R A r) :
P = Q := by
replace h : P.algebraMap = Q.algebraMap := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
have h' : (haveI := P; (· • ·) : R → A → A) = (haveI := Q; (· • ·) : R → A → A) := by
funext r a
rw [P.smul_def', Q.smul_def', h]
rcases P with @⟨⟨P⟩⟩
rcases Q with @⟨⟨Q⟩⟩
congr
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) toModule {R A} {_ : CommSemiring R} {_ : Semiring A} [Algebra R A] :
Module R A where
one_smul _ := by simp [smul_def']
mul_smul := by simp [smul_def', mul_assoc]
smul_add := by simp [smul_def', mul_add]
smul_zero := by simp [smul_def']
add_smul := by simp [smul_def', add_mul]
zero_smul := by simp [smul_def']
theorem smul_def (r : R) (x : A) : r • x = algebraMap R A r * x :=
Algebra.smul_def' r x
theorem algebraMap_eq_smul_one (r : R) : algebraMap R A r = r • (1 : A) :=
calc
algebraMap R A r = algebraMap R A r * 1 := (mul_one _).symm
_ = r • (1 : A) := (Algebra.smul_def r 1).symm
theorem algebraMap_eq_smul_one' : ⇑(algebraMap R A) = fun r => r • (1 : A) :=
funext algebraMap_eq_smul_one
/-- `mul_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem commutes (r : R) (x : A) : algebraMap R A r * x = x * algebraMap R A r :=
Algebra.commutes' r x
lemma commute_algebraMap_left (r : R) (x : A) : Commute (algebraMap R A r) x :=
Algebra.commutes r x
lemma commute_algebraMap_right (r : R) (x : A) : Commute x (algebraMap R A r) :=
(Algebra.commutes r x).symm
/-- `mul_left_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem left_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
x * (algebraMap R A r * y) = algebraMap R A r * (x * y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← commutes, mul_assoc]
/-- `mul_right_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem right_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
x * algebraMap R A r * y = x * y * algebraMap R A r := by
rw [mul_assoc, commutes, ← mul_assoc]
instance _root_.IsScalarTower.right : IsScalarTower R A A :=
⟨fun x y z => by rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_def, smul_def, mul_assoc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.RingHom.smulOneHom_eq_algebraMap : RingHom.smulOneHom = algebraMap R A :=
RingHom.ext fun r => (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm
-- TODO: set up `IsScalarTower.smulCommClass` earlier so that we can actually prove this using
-- `mul_smul_comm s x y`.
/-- This is just a special case of the global `mul_smul_comm` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
@[simp]
protected theorem mul_smul_comm (s : R) (x y : A) : x * s • y = s • (x * y) := by
rw [smul_def, smul_def, left_comm]
/-- This is just a special case of the global `smul_mul_assoc` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
@[simp]
protected theorem smul_mul_assoc (r : R) (x y : A) : r • x * y = r • (x * y) :=
smul_mul_assoc r x y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.smul_algebraMap {α : Type*} [Monoid α] [MulDistribMulAction α A]
[SMulCommClass α R A] (a : α) (r : R) : a • algebraMap R A r = algebraMap R A r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_comm a r (1 : A), smul_one]
section compHom
variable (A) (f : S →+* R)
/--
Compose an `Algebra` with a `RingHom`, with action `f s • m`.
This is the algebra version of `Module.compHom`.
-/
abbrev compHom : Algebra S A where
smul s a := f s • a
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp f
commutes' _ _ := Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ _ := Algebra.smul_def _ _
theorem compHom_smul_def (s : S) (x : A) :
letI := compHom A f
s • x = f s • x := rfl
theorem compHom_algebraMap_eq :
letI := compHom A f
algebraMap S A = (algebraMap R A).comp f := rfl
theorem compHom_algebraMap_apply (s : S) :
letI := compHom A f
algebraMap S A s = (algebraMap R A) (f s) := rfl
end compHom
variable (R A)
| /-- The canonical ring homomorphism `algebraMap R A : R →+* A` for any `R`-algebra `A`,
packaged as an `R`-linear map.
-/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Defs.lean | 352 | 354 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a * 0 = 0`
* `a * (b₁ + b₂) = (a * b₁) + (a * b₂)`
-/
def evalMul₁ {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul {d : R} (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
/-- Multiplies two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 * b = 0`
* `(a₁ + a₂) * b = (a₁ * b) + (a₂ * b)`
-/
def evalMul {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by simp
theorem natCast_mul {a₁ a₃ : ℕ} (a₂) (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁)
(_ : ((a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₃) : ((a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ ^ a₂ * b₃ := by
subst_vars; simp
theorem natCast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 := Nat.cast_zero
theorem natCast_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ}
(_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) : ((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
mutual
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* An atom `e` causes `↑e` to be allocated as a new atom.
* A sum delegates to `ExSum.evalNatCast`.
-/
partial def ExBase.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
| .sum va => do
let ⟨_, vc, p⟩ ← va.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .sum vc, p⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat monomial to produce a monomial in `α`.
* `↑c = c` if `c` is a numeric literal
* `↑(a ^ n * b) = ↑a ^ n * ↑b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .const c hc =>
have n : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
pure ⟨q(Nat.rawCast $n), .const c hc, (q(natCast_nat (R := $α) $n) : Expr)⟩
| | .mul (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 532 | 533 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,294 | 1,295 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Partrec
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
/-!
# Gödel Numbering for Partial Recursive Functions.
This file defines `Nat.Partrec.Code`, an inductive datatype describing code for partial
recursive functions on ℕ. It defines an encoding for these codes, and proves that the constructors
are primitive recursive with respect to the encoding.
It also defines the evaluation of these codes as partial functions using `PFun`, and proves that a
function is partially recursive (as defined by `Nat.Partrec`) if and only if it is the evaluation
of some code.
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.Partrec.Code`: Inductive datatype for partial recursive codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`: A (computable) encoding of codes as natural numbers.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode`: The inverse of this encoding.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`: The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
## Main Results
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_computable`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.smn`: The $S_n^m$ theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.exists_code`: Partial recursiveness is equivalent to being the eval of a code.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_prim`: `evaln` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point`: Roger's fixed point theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point₂`: Kleene's second recursion theorem.
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open Encodable Denumerable
namespace Nat.Partrec
theorem rfind' {f} (hf : Nat.Partrec f) :
Nat.Partrec
(Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)) :=
Partrec₂.unpaired'.2 <| by
refine
Partrec.map
((@Partrec₂.unpaired' fun a b : ℕ =>
Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + b))).1
?_)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst).to_comp.to₂
have : Nat.Partrec (fun a => Nat.rfind (fun n => (fun m => decide (m = 0)) <$>
Nat.unpaired (fun a b => f (Nat.pair (Nat.unpair a).1 (b + (Nat.unpair a).2)))
(Nat.pair a n))) :=
rfind
(Partrec₂.unpaired'.2
((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hf).comp
(Primrec₂.pair.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd
(Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst))).to_comp))
simpa
/-- Code for partial recursive functions from ℕ to ℕ.
See `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval` for the interpretation of these constructors.
-/
inductive Code : Type
| zero : Code
| succ : Code
| left : Code
| right : Code
| pair : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| prec : Code → Code → Code
| rfind' : Code → Code
compile_inductive% Code
end Nat.Partrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
instance instInhabited : Inhabited Code :=
⟨zero⟩
/-- Returns a code for the constant function outputting a particular natural. -/
protected def const : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => comp succ (Code.const n)
theorem const_inj : ∀ {n₁ n₂}, Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₁ = Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₂ → n₁ = n₂
| 0, 0, _ => by simp
| n₁ + 1, n₂ + 1, h => by
dsimp [Nat.Partrec.Code.const] at h
injection h with h₁ h₂
simp only [const_inj h₂]
/-- A code for the identity function. -/
protected def id : Code :=
pair left right
/-- Given a code `c` taking a pair as input, returns a code using `n` as the first argument to `c`.
-/
def curry (c : Code) (n : ℕ) : Code :=
comp c (pair (Code.const n) Code.id)
/-- An encoding of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a ℕ. -/
def encodeCode : Code → ℕ
| zero => 0
| succ => 1
| left => 2
| right => 3
| pair cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 4
| comp cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg) + 1) + 4
| prec cf cg => (2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 1) + 4
| rfind' cf => (2 * (2 * encodeCode cf + 1) + 1) + 4
/--
A decoder for `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`, taking any ℕ to the `Nat.Partrec.Code` it represents.
-/
def ofNatCode : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| 1 => succ
| 2 => left
| 3 => right
| n + 4 =>
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
match n.bodd, n.div2.bodd with
| false, false => pair (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| false, true => comp (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , false => prec (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , true => rfind' (ofNatCode m)
/-- Proof that `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode` is the inverse of `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode` -/
private theorem encode_ofNatCode : ∀ n, encodeCode (ofNatCode n) = n
| 0 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 1 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 2 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 3 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| n + 4 => by
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
have IH := encode_ofNatCode m
have IH1 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.1
have IH2 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.2
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.bit_decomp n, ← Nat.bit_decomp n.div2]
simp only [ofNatCode.eq_5]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;>
simp [m, encodeCode, ofNatCode, IH, IH1, IH2, Nat.bit_val]
instance instDenumerable : Denumerable Code :=
mk'
⟨encodeCode, ofNatCode, fun c => by
induction c <;> simp [encodeCode, ofNatCode, Nat.div2_val, *],
encode_ofNatCode⟩
theorem encodeCode_eq : encode = encodeCode :=
rfl
theorem ofNatCode_eq : ofNat Code = ofNatCode :=
rfl
theorem encode_lt_pair (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (pair cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (pair cf cg) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (Nat.pair cf.encodeCode cg.encodeCode) (by decide : 1 ≤ 2 * 2)
rw [one_mul, mul_assoc] at this
have := lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (by decide : 0 < 4))
exact ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.left_le_pair _ _) this, lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.right_le_pair _ _) this⟩
theorem encode_lt_comp (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (comp cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (comp cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (comp cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_prec (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (prec cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (prec cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (prec cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_rfind' (cf) : encode cf < encode (rfind' cf) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
omega
end Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Primrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
theorem pair_prim : Primrec₂ pair :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem comp_prim : Primrec₂ comp :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double_succ.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem prec_prim : Primrec₂ prec :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem rfind_prim : Primrec rfind' :=
ofNat_iff.2 <|
encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <| nat_double_succ.comp <|
encode_iff.2 <| Primrec.ofNat Code)
(const 4)
theorem rec_prim' {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Primrec₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Primrec₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Primrec (fun a => F a (c a) : α → σ) := by
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
IH[m]?.bind fun s =>
IH[m.unpair.1]?.bind fun s₁ =>
IH[m.unpair.2]?.map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Primrec G₁ :=
option_bind (list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk <|
option_bind ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk <|
option_map ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk <|
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Primrec.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Primrec₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
iterate 4 rcases n with - | n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁, m, List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive. -/
theorem rec_prim {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpr : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pr a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{co : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hco : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => co a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{pc : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pc a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{rf : α → Code → σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec fun a : α × Code × σ => rf a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2) :
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (pr a) (co a) (pc a) (rf a)
Primrec fun a => F a (c a) :=
rec_prim' hc hz hs hl hr
(pr := fun a b => pr a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpr)
(co := fun a b => co a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hco)
(pc := fun a b => pc a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpc)
(rf := fun a b => rf a b.1 b.2) (.mk hrf)
end Nat.Partrec.Code
end
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Computable
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable. -/
theorem rec_computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Computable c)
{z : α → σ} (hz : Computable z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Computable s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Computable l)
{r : α → σ} (hr : Computable r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Computable₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Computable₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Computable₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Computable₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Computable fun a => F a (c a) := by
-- TODO(Mario): less copy-paste from previous proof
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
IH[m]?.bind fun s =>
IH[m.unpair.1]?.bind fun s₁ =>
IH[m.unpair.2]?.map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Computable G₁ := by
refine option_bind (list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk ?_
refine option_bind ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk ?_
refine option_map ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk ?_
exact
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Computable.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Computable₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
iterate 4 rcases n with - | n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁, m, List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
end
/-- The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.zero`: The constant zero function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.succ`: The successor function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.left`: Left unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.right`: Right unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.pair`: Pairs the outputs of argument codes using `Nat.pair`.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.comp`: Composition of two argument codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.prec`: Primitive recursion. Given an argument of the form `Nat.pair a n`:
* If `n = 0`, returns `eval cf a`.
* If `n = succ k`, returns `eval cg (pair a (pair k (eval (prec cf cg) (pair a k))))`
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rfind'`: Minimization. For `f` an argument of the form `Nat.pair a m`,
`rfind' f m` returns the least `a` such that `f a m = 0`, if one exists and `f b m` terminates
for `b < a`
-/
def eval : Code → ℕ →. ℕ
| zero => pure 0
| succ => Nat.succ
| left => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair cf cg => fun n => Nat.pair <$> eval cf n <*> eval cg n
| comp cf cg => fun n => eval cg n >>= eval cf
| prec cf cg =>
Nat.unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (eval cf a) fun y IH => do
let i ← IH
eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| rfind' cf =>
Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> eval cf (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the base case. -/
@[simp]
theorem eval_prec_zero (cf cg : Code) (a : ℕ) : eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a 0) = eval cf a := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp (config := { Lean.Meta.Simp.neutralConfig with proj := true }) only []
rw [Nat.rec_zero]
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the recursive case. -/
theorem eval_prec_succ (cf cg : Code) (a k : ℕ) :
eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a (Nat.succ k)) =
do {let ih ← eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a k); eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair k ih))} := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Part.bind_eq_bind, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp
instance : Membership (ℕ →. ℕ) Code :=
⟨fun c f => eval c = f⟩
@[simp]
theorem eval_const : ∀ n m, eval (Code.const n) m = Part.some n
| 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, m => by simp! [eval_const n m]
@[simp]
theorem eval_id (n) : eval Code.id n = Part.some n := by simp! [Seq.seq, Code.id]
@[simp]
theorem eval_curry (c n x) : eval (curry c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) := by simp! [Seq.seq, curry]
theorem const_prim : Primrec Code.const :=
(_root_.Primrec.id.nat_iterate (_root_.Primrec.const zero)
(comp_prim.comp (_root_.Primrec.const succ) Primrec.snd).to₂).of_eq
fun n => by simp; induction n <;>
simp [*, Code.const, Function.iterate_succ', -Function.iterate_succ]
theorem curry_prim : Primrec₂ curry :=
comp_prim.comp Primrec.fst <| pair_prim.comp (const_prim.comp Primrec.snd)
(_root_.Primrec.const Code.id)
theorem curry_inj {c₁ c₂ n₁ n₂} (h : curry c₁ n₁ = curry c₂ n₂) : c₁ = c₂ ∧ n₁ = n₂ :=
⟨by injection h, by
injection h with h₁ h₂
injection h₂ with h₃ h₄
exact const_inj h₃⟩
/--
The $S_n^m$ theorem: There is a computable function, namely `Nat.Partrec.Code.curry`, that takes a
program and a ℕ `n`, and returns a new program using `n` as the first argument.
-/
theorem smn :
∃ f : Code → ℕ → Code, Computable₂ f ∧ ∀ c n x, eval (f c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) :=
⟨curry, Primrec₂.to_comp curry_prim, eval_curry⟩
/-- A function is partial recursive if and only if there is a code implementing it. Therefore,
`eval` is a **universal partial recursive function**. -/
theorem exists_code {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec f ↔ ∃ c : Code, eval c = f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· induction h with
| zero => exact ⟨zero, rfl⟩
| succ => exact ⟨succ, rfl⟩
| left => exact ⟨left, rfl⟩
| right => exact ⟨right, rfl⟩
| pair pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨pair cf cg, rfl⟩
| comp pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨comp cf cg, rfl⟩
| prec pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨prec cf cg, rfl⟩
| rfind pf hf =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩
refine ⟨comp (rfind' cf) (pair Code.id zero), ?_⟩
simp [eval, Seq.seq, pure, PFun.pure, Part.map_id']
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
induction c with
| zero => exact Nat.Partrec.zero
| succ => exact Nat.Partrec.succ
| left => exact Nat.Partrec.left
| right => exact Nat.Partrec.right
| pair cf cg pf pg => exact pf.pair pg
| comp cf cg pf pg => exact pf.comp pg
| prec cf cg pf pg => exact pf.prec pg
| rfind' cf pf => exact pf.rfind'
/-- A modified evaluation for the code which returns an `Option ℕ` instead of a `Part ℕ`. To avoid
undecidability, `evaln` takes a parameter `k` and fails if it encounters a number ≥ k in the course
of its execution. Other than this, the semantics are the same as in `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`.
-/
def evaln : ℕ → Code → ℕ → Option ℕ
| 0, _ => fun _ => Option.none
| k + 1, zero => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return 0
| k + 1, succ => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return (Nat.succ n)
| k + 1, left => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return n.unpair.1
| k + 1, right => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
pure n.unpair.2
| k + 1, pair cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
Nat.pair <$> evaln (k + 1) cf n <*> evaln (k + 1) cg n
| k + 1, comp cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cg n
evaln (k + 1) cf x
| k + 1, prec cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a n =>
n.casesOn (evaln (k + 1) cf a) fun y => do
let i ← evaln k (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a y)
evaln (k + 1) cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| k + 1, rfind' cf => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a m => do
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cf (Nat.pair a m)
if x = 0 then
pure m
else
evaln k (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair a (m + 1))
theorem evaln_bound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → n < k
| 0, c, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
suffices ∀ {o : Option ℕ}, x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o } → n < k + 1 by
cases c <;> rw [evaln] at h <;> exact this h
simpa [Option.bind_eq_some_iff] using Nat.lt_succ_of_le
theorem evaln_mono : ∀ {k₁ k₂ c n x}, k₁ ≤ k₂ → x ∈ evaln k₁ c n → x ∈ evaln k₂ c n
| 0, k₂, c, n, x, _, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, k₂ + 1, c, n, x, hl, h => by
have hl' := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hl
have :
∀ {k k₂ n x : ℕ} {o₁ o₂ : Option ℕ},
k ≤ k₂ → (x ∈ o₁ → x ∈ o₂) →
x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o₁ } → x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k₂); o₂ } := by
simp only [Option.mem_def, bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff, Option.guard_eq_some',
exists_and_left, exists_const, and_imp]
introv h h₁ h₂ h₃
exact ⟨le_trans h₂ h, h₁ h₃⟩
simp? at h ⊢ says simp only [Option.mem_def] at h ⊢
induction c generalizing x n <;> rw [evaln] at h ⊢ <;> refine this hl' (fun h => ?_) h
iterate 4 exact h
case pair cf cg hf hg _ =>
simp? [Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [Seq.seq, Option.map_eq_map, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff,
Option.map_eq_some', exists_exists_and_eq_and] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hf _ _) <| Exists.imp fun b => And.imp_left (hg _ _)
case comp cf cg hf hg _ =>
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [bind, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hg _ _) (hf _ _)
case prec cf cg hf hg _ =>
revert h
simp only [unpaired, bind, Option.mem_def]
induction n.unpair.2 <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· apply hf
· exact fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, evaln_mono hl' h₁, hg _ _ h₂⟩
case rfind' cf hf _ =>
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [unpaired, bind, pair_unpair, Option.pure_def, Option.mem_def,
Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
refine h.imp fun x => And.imp (hf _ _) ?_
by_cases x0 : x = 0 <;> simp [x0]
exact evaln_mono hl'
theorem evaln_sound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → x ∈ eval c n
| 0, _, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
induction c generalizing x n <;> simp [eval, evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff, Seq.seq] at h ⊢ <;>
obtain ⟨_, h⟩ := h
iterate 4 simpa [pure, PFun.pure, eq_comm] using h
case pair cf cg hf hg _ =>
rcases h with ⟨y, ef, z, eg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf _ _ ef, _, hg _ _ eg, rfl⟩
case comp cf cg hf hg _ =>
rcases h with ⟨y, eg, ef⟩
exact ⟨_, hg _ _ eg, hf _ _ ef⟩
case prec cf cg hf hg _ =>
revert h
induction' n.unpair.2 with m IH generalizing x <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· apply hf
· refine fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, IH _ ?_, ?_⟩
· have := evaln_mono k.le_succ h₁
simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at this
exact this.2
· exact hg _ _ h₂
case rfind' cf hf _ =>
rcases h with ⟨m, h₁, h₂⟩
by_cases m0 : m = 0 <;> simp [m0] at h₂
· exact
⟨0, ⟨by simpa [m0] using hf _ _ h₁, fun {m} => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim⟩, by simp [h₂]⟩
· have := evaln_sound h₂
simp [eval] at this
rcases this with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
refine
⟨y + 1, ⟨by simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁, fun {i} im => ?_⟩, by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
rcases i with - | i
· exact ⟨m, by simpa using hf _ _ h₁, m0⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ im) with ⟨z, hz, z0⟩
exact ⟨z, by simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm] using hz, z0⟩
theorem evaln_complete {c n x} : x ∈ eval c n ↔ ∃ k, x ∈ evaln k c n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨k, h⟩ => evaln_sound h⟩
rsuffices ⟨k, h⟩ : ∃ k, x ∈ evaln (k + 1) c n
· exact ⟨k + 1, h⟩
induction c generalizing n x with
simp [eval, evaln, pure, PFun.pure, Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
| pair cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
rcases hf hx with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hg hy with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
refine
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂, rfl⟩
| comp cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rcases hg hy with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hf hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
exact
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
| prec cf cg hf hg =>
revert h
generalize n.unpair.1 = n₁; generalize n.unpair.2 = n₂
induction' n₂ with m IH generalizing x n <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· intro h
rcases hf h with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, le_max_left _ _, evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk⟩
· intro y hy hx
rcases IH hy with ⟨k₁, nk₁, hk₁⟩
rcases hg hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine
⟨(max k₁ k₂).succ,
Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <|
le_trans (le_max_left _ (Nat.pair n₁ m)) nk₁, y,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) ?_,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
simp only [evaln.eq_8, bind, unpaired, unpair_pair, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff,
Option.guard_eq_some', exists_and_left, exists_const]
exact ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) nk₁, hk₁⟩
| rfind' cf hf =>
rcases h with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
suffices ∃ k, y + n.unpair.2 ∈ evaln (k + 1) (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2) by
simpa [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
revert hy₁ hy₂
generalize n.unpair.2 = m
intro hy₁ hy₂
induction' y with y IH generalizing m <;> simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· simp at hy₁
rcases hf hy₁ with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk, _, hk, by simp⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.succ_pos _) with ⟨a, ha, a0⟩
rcases hf ha with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩
rcases IH m.succ (by simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁)
fun {i} hi => by
simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
hy₂ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hi) with
⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
use (max k₁ k₂).succ
rw [zero_add] at hk₁
use Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁
use a
use evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁
simpa [a0, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂
| _ => exact ⟨⟨_, le_rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
section
open Primrec
private def lup (L : List (List (Option ℕ))) (p : ℕ × Code) (n : ℕ) := do
let l ← L[encode p]?
let o ← l[n]?
o
private theorem hlup : Primrec fun p : _ × (_ × _) × _ => lup p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 :=
Primrec.option_bind
(Primrec.list_getElem?.comp Primrec.fst (Primrec.encode.comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd))
(Primrec.option_bind (Primrec.list_getElem?.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp <|
Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst) Primrec.snd)
private def G (L : List (List (Option ℕ))) : Option (List (Option ℕ)) :=
Option.some <|
let a := ofNat (ℕ × Code) L.length
let k := a.1
let c := a.2
(List.range k).map fun n =>
k.casesOn Option.none fun k' =>
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c
(some 0) -- zero
(some (Nat.succ n))
(some n.unpair.1)
(some n.unpair.2)
(fun cf cg _ _ => do
let x ← lup L (k, cf) n
let y ← lup L (k, cg) n
some (Nat.pair x y))
(fun cf cg _ _ => do
let x ← lup L (k, cg) n
lup L (k, cf) x)
(fun cf cg _ _ =>
let z := n.unpair.1
n.unpair.2.casesOn (lup L (k, cf) z) fun y => do
let i ← lup L (k', c) (Nat.pair z y)
lup L (k, cg) (Nat.pair z (Nat.pair y i)))
(fun cf _ =>
let z := n.unpair.1
let m := n.unpair.2
do
let x ← lup L (k, cf) (Nat.pair z m)
x.casesOn (some m) fun _ => lup L (k', c) (Nat.pair z (m + 1)))
private theorem hG : Primrec G := by
have a := (Primrec.ofNat (ℕ × Code)).comp (Primrec.list_length (α := List (Option ℕ)))
have k := Primrec.fst.comp a
refine Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.list_map (Primrec.list_range.comp k) (?_ : Primrec _))
replace k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have n := Primrec.snd (α := List (List (Option ℕ))) (β := ℕ)
refine Primrec.nat_casesOn k (_root_.Primrec.const Option.none) (?_ : Primrec _)
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have k' := Primrec.snd (α := List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) (β := ℕ)
have c := Primrec.snd.comp (a.comp <| (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ)).comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ)))
apply
Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim c
(_root_.Primrec.const (some 0))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp n))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp n))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp n))
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
refine Primrec.option_bind (hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair n) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
conv =>
congr
· ext p
dsimp only []
erw [Option.bind_eq_bind, ← Option.map_eq_bind]
refine Primrec.option_map ((hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cg).pair n).comp Primrec.fst) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
exact Primrec₂.natPair.comp (Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst) Primrec.snd
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
refine Primrec.option_bind (hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cg).pair n) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
have h :=
hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <| ((k.pair cf).comp Primrec.fst).pair Primrec.snd)
exact h
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have z := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
refine
Primrec.nat_casesOn (Primrec.snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n))
(hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair z)
(?_ : Primrec _)
have L := L.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have z := z.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have y := Primrec.snd
(α := ((List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ) × Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ) (β := ℕ)
have h₁ := hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (((k'.pair c).comp Primrec.fst).comp Primrec.fst).pair
(Primrec₂.natPair.comp z y)
refine Primrec.option_bind h₁ (?_ : Primrec _)
have z := z.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have y := y.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have i := Primrec.snd
(α := (((List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ) × Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := ℕ)
have h₂ := hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
((k.pair cg).comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp z <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp y i)
exact h₂
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Option ℕ))
have z := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
have m := Primrec.snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
have h₁ := hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair (Primrec₂.natPair.comp z m)
refine Primrec.option_bind h₁ (?_ : Primrec _)
have m := m.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
refine Primrec.nat_casesOn Primrec.snd (Primrec.option_some.comp m) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
exact (hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
((k'.pair c).comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).pair
(Primrec₂.natPair.comp (z.comp Primrec.fst) (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp m)))).comp
Primrec.fst
private theorem evaln_map (k c n) :
((List.range k)[n]?.bind fun a ↦ evaln k c a) = evaln k c n := by
by_cases kn : n < k
· simp [List.getElem?_range kn]
· rw [List.getElem?_eq_none]
· cases e : evaln k c n
· rfl
exact kn.elim (evaln_bound e)
simpa using kn
/-- The `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln` function is primitive recursive. -/
theorem evaln_prim : Primrec fun a : (ℕ × Code) × ℕ => evaln a.1.1 a.1.2 a.2 :=
have :
Primrec₂ fun (_ : Unit) (n : ℕ) =>
let a := ofNat (ℕ × Code) n
(List.range a.1).map (evaln a.1 a.2) :=
Primrec.nat_strong_rec _ (hG.comp Primrec.snd).to₂ fun _ p => by
simp only [G, prod_ofNat_val, ofNat_nat, List.length_map, List.length_range,
Nat.pair_unpair, Option.some_inj]
refine List.map_congr_left fun n => ?_
have : List.range p = List.range (Nat.pair p.unpair.1 (encode (ofNat Code p.unpair.2))) := by
simp
rw [this]
generalize p.unpair.1 = k
generalize ofNat Code p.unpair.2 = c
intro nk
rcases k with - | k'
· simp [evaln]
let k := k' + 1
simp only [show k'.succ = k from rfl]
simp? [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at nk says simp only [List.mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at nk
have hg :
∀ {k' c' n},
Nat.pair k' (encode c') < Nat.pair k (encode c) →
lup ((List.range (Nat.pair k (encode c))).map fun n =>
(List.range n.unpair.1).map (evaln n.unpair.1 (ofNat Code n.unpair.2))) (k', c') n =
evaln k' c' n := by
intro k₁ c₁ n₁ hl
simp [lup, List.getElem?_range hl, evaln_map, Bind.bind, Option.bind_map]
obtain - | - | - | - | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | cf := c <;>
simp [evaln, nk, Bind.bind, Functor.map, Seq.seq, pure]
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_pair cf cg
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf), hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lg)]
cases evaln k cf n
· rfl
cases evaln k cg n <;> rfl
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_comp cf cg
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lg)]
cases evaln k cg n
· rfl
simp [k, hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf)]
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_prec cf cg
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf)]
cases n.unpair.2
· rfl
simp only [decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq]
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_left _ k'.lt_succ_self)]
cases evaln k' _ _
· rfl
simp [k, hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lg)]
· have lf := encode_lt_rfind' cf
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf)]
rcases evaln k cf n with - | x
· rfl
simp only [decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq, Option.some_bind]
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_left _ k'.lt_succ_self)]
(Primrec.option_bind
(Primrec.list_getElem?.comp (this.comp (_root_.Primrec.const ())
(Primrec.encode_iff.2 Primrec.fst)) Primrec.snd) Primrec.snd.to₂).of_eq
fun ⟨⟨k, c⟩, n⟩ => by simp [evaln_map, Option.bind_map]
end
section
open Partrec Computable
theorem eval_eq_rfindOpt (c n) : eval c n = Nat.rfindOpt fun k => evaln k c n :=
Part.ext fun x => by
refine evaln_complete.trans (Nat.rfindOpt_mono ?_).symm
intro a m n hl; apply evaln_mono hl
theorem eval_part : Partrec₂ eval :=
(Partrec.rfindOpt
(evaln_prim.to_comp.comp ((Computable.snd.pair (fst.comp fst)).pair (snd.comp fst))).to₂).of_eq
fun a => by simp [eval_eq_rfindOpt]
/-- **Roger's fixed-point theorem**: any total, computable `f` has a fixed point.
That is, under the interpretation given by `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`, there is a code `c`
such that `c` and `f c` have the same evaluation.
-/
theorem fixed_point {f : Code → Code} (hf : Computable f) : ∃ c : Code, eval (f c) = eval c :=
let g (x y : ℕ) : Part ℕ := eval (ofNat Code x) x >>= fun b => eval (ofNat Code b) y
have : Partrec₂ g :=
(eval_part.comp ((Computable.ofNat _).comp fst) fst).bind
(eval_part.comp ((Computable.ofNat _).comp snd) (snd.comp fst)).to₂
let ⟨cg, eg⟩ := exists_code.1 this
have eg' : ∀ a n, eval cg (Nat.pair a n) = Part.map encode (g a n) := by simp [eg]
let F (x : ℕ) : Code := f (curry cg x)
have : Computable F :=
hf.comp (curry_prim.comp (_root_.Primrec.const cg) _root_.Primrec.id).to_comp
let ⟨cF, eF⟩ := exists_code.1 this
have eF' : eval cF (encode cF) = Part.some (encode (F (encode cF))) := by simp [eF]
⟨curry cg (encode cF),
funext fun n =>
show eval (f (curry cg (encode cF))) n = eval (curry cg (encode cF)) n by
simp [F, g, eg', eF', Part.map_id']⟩
/-- **Kleene's second recursion theorem** -/
theorem fixed_point₂ {f : Code → ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec₂ f) : ∃ c : Code, eval c = f c :=
let ⟨cf, ef⟩ := exists_code.1 hf
(fixed_point (curry_prim.comp (_root_.Primrec.const cf) Primrec.encode).to_comp).imp fun c e =>
funext fun n => by simp [e.symm, ef, Part.map_id']
end
/-- There are only countably many partial recursive partial functions `ℕ →. ℕ`. -/
instance : Countable {f : ℕ →. ℕ // _root_.Partrec f} := by
apply Function.Surjective.countable (f := fun c => ⟨eval c, eval_part.comp (.const c) .id⟩)
intro ⟨f, hf⟩; simpa using exists_code.1 hf
/-- There are only countably many computable functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
instance : Countable {f : ℕ → ℕ // Computable f} :=
@Function.Injective.countable {f : ℕ → ℕ // Computable f} {f : ℕ →. ℕ // _root_.Partrec f} _
(fun f => ⟨f.val, f.2⟩)
(fun _ _ h => Subtype.val_inj.1 (PFun.lift_injective (by simpa using h)))
end Nat.Partrec.Code
| Mathlib/Computability/PartrecCode.lean | 1,041 | 1,056 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_eq_left]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_neg_cancel, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
zsmul_left_inj hp]
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, zsmul_left_inj hp]
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_left_mono hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_left_strictMono hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
end
/-!
### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
section Circular
open AddCommGroup
private theorem toIxxMod_iff (x₁ x₂ x₃ : α) : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp 0 (x₂ - x₁) + toIcoMod hp 0 (x₁ - x₃) ≤ p := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_sub, toIocMod_eq_sub _ x₁, add_le_add_iff_right, ← neg_sub x₁ x₃, toIocMod_neg,
neg_zero, le_sub_iff_add_le]
private theorem toIxxMod_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} (h : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃) :
toIcoMod hp x₂ x₃ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₁ := by
let x₂' := toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂
let x₃' := toIcoMod hp x₂' x₃
have h : x₂' ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' := by simpa [x₃']
have h₂₁ : x₂' < x₁ + p := toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _
have h₃₂ : x₃' - p < x₂' := sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _)
suffices hequiv : x₃' ≤ toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ by
obtain ⟨z, hd⟩ : ∃ z : ℤ, x₂ = x₂' + z • p := ((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).1 rfl).2
simpa [hd, toIocMod_add_zsmul', toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_le_add_iff_right]
rcases le_or_lt x₃' (x₁ + p) with h₃₁ | h₁₃
· suffices hIoc₂₁ : toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ = x₁ + p from hIoc₂₁.symm.trans_ge h₃₁
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨h₂₁, by simp [x₂', left_le_toIcoMod]⟩, -1, by simp⟩
have hIoc₁₃ : toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' = x₃' - p := by
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 h₁₃, le_of_lt (h₃₂.trans h₂₁)⟩, 1, by simp⟩
have not_h₃₂ := (h.trans hIoc₁₃.le).not_lt
contradiction
private theorem toIxxMod_antisymm (h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c)
(h₁₃₂ : toIcoMod hp a c ≤ toIocMod hp a b) :
b ≡ a [PMOD p] ∨ c ≡ b [PMOD p] ∨ a ≡ c [PMOD p] := by
by_contra! h
rw [modEq_comm] at h
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.2.2] at h₁₂₃
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.1] at h₁₃₂
exact h.2.1 ((toIcoMod_inj _).1 <| h₁₃₂.antisymm h₁₂₃)
private theorem toIxxMod_total' (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp b a ≤ toIocMod hp b c ∨ toIcoMod hp b c ≤ toIocMod hp b a := by
/- an essential ingredient is the lemma saying {a-b} + {b-a} = period if a ≠ b (and = 0 if a = b).
Thus if a ≠ b and b ≠ c then ({a-b} + {b-c}) + ({c-b} + {b-a}) = 2 * period, so one of
`{a-b} + {b-c}` and `{c-b} + {b-a}` must be `≤ period` -/
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp a b) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp c b)
simp only [add_add_add_comm] at this
rw [_root_.add_comm (toIocMod _ _ _), add_add_add_comm, ← two_nsmul] at this
replace := min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul this.le
rw [min_le_iff] at this
rw [toIxxMod_iff, toIxxMod_iff]
refine this.imp (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _) (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _)
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
| · apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 768 | 769 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Pythagorean Triples
The main result is the classification of Pythagorean triples. The final result is for general
Pythagorean triples. It follows from the more interesting relatively prime case. We use the
"rational parametrization of the circle" method for the proof. The parametrization maps the point
`(x / z, y / z)` to the slope of the line through `(-1 , 0)` and `(x / z, y / z)`. This quickly
shows that `(x / z, y / z) = (2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2), (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))` where
`m / n` is the slope. In order to identify numerators and denominators we now need results showing
that these are coprime. This is easy except for the prime 2. In order to deal with that we have to
analyze the parity of `x`, `y`, `m` and `n` and eliminate all the impossible cases. This takes up
the bulk of the proof below.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
noncomputable section
/-- Three integers `x`, `y`, and `z` form a Pythagorean triple if `x * x + y * y = z * z`. -/
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
/-- Pythagorean triples are interchangeable, i.e `x * x + y * y = y * y + x * x = z * z`.
This comes from additive commutativity. -/
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
/-- The zeroth Pythagorean triple is all zeros. -/
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ}
theorem eq (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
/-- A triple is still a triple if you multiply `x`, `y` and `z`
by a constant `k`. -/
theorem mul (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
/-- `(k*x, k*y, k*z)` is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
`(x, y, z)` is also a triple. -/
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
/-- A Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is “classified” if there exist integers `k, m, n` such that
either
* `x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)` and `y = k * (2 * m * n)`, or
* `x = k * (2 * m * n)` and `y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
/-- A primitive Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is a Pythagorean triple with `x` and `y` coprime.
Such a triple is “primitively classified” if there exist coprime integers `m, n` such that either
* `x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2` and `y = 2 * m * n`, or
* `x = 2 * m * n` and `y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
variable (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
include h
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx | hx <;>
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy | hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
obtain ⟨x0, hx2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hx)
obtain ⟨y0, hy2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hy)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
omega
theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
theorem ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 := by
suffices 0 < z * z by
rintro rfl
norm_num at this
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq]
have hc' : Int.gcd x y ≠ 0 := by
rw [hc]
exact one_ne_zero
rcases Int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz | hyz
· apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hxz) (sq_nonneg y)
· apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hyz)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hx : x = 0) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
subst x
change Nat.gcd 0 (Int.natAbs y) = 1 at hc
rw [Nat.gcd_zero_left (Int.natAbs y)] at hc
rcases Int.natAbs_eq y with hy | hy
· use 1, 0
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_right]
decide
· use 0, 1
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_left]
decide
theorem coprime_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : Int.gcd y z = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpy, hpz⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← hc]
apply Nat.dvd_gcd (Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp _ _) hpy
rw [sq, eq_sub_of_add_eq h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hpy hpz
exact dvd_sub (hpz.mul_right _) (hpy.mul_right _)
end PythagoreanTriple
section circleEquivGen
/-!
### A parametrization of the unit circle
For the classification of Pythagorean triples, we will use a parametrization of the unit circle.
-/
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- A parameterization of the unit circle that is useful for classifying Pythagorean triples.
(To be applied in the case where `K = ℚ`.) -/
def circleEquivGen (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
K ≃ { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } where
toFun x :=
⟨⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩, by
field_simp [hk x, div_pow]
ring, by
simp only [Ne, div_eq_iff (hk x), neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_inj]
simpa only [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, one_pow] using hk 1⟩
invFun p := (p : K × K).1 / ((p : K × K).2 + 1)
left_inv x := by
have h2 : (1 + 1 : K) = 2 := by norm_num
have h3 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2, h2]
field_simp [hk x, h2, add_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_cancel, mul_comm]
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, hy⟩ => by
change x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 at hxy
have h2 : y + 1 ≠ 0 := mt eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hy
have h3 : (y + 1) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 = 2 * (y + 1) := by
rw [(add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm).symm]
ring
have h4 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2]
ring
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
constructor
· field_simp [h3]
ring
· field_simp [h3]
rw [← add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm]
ring
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) (x : K) :
(circleEquivGen hk x : K × K) = ⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_symm_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0)
(v : { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 }) :
(circleEquivGen hk).symm v = (v : K × K).1 / ((v : K × K).2 + 1) :=
rfl
end circleEquivGen
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have h2m : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * m ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_add hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have h2n : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * n ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have hmc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs m := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2m
have hnc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs n := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2n
by_cases h2 : p = 2
· have h3 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 1 := by
simp only [sq, Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn, dvd_refl, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd]
decide
have h4 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 0 := by
apply Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
rwa [h2] at hp2
rw [h4] at h3
exact zero_ne_one h3
· apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Or.resolve_left hmc h2) (Or.resolve_left hnc h2)
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2), add_comm]
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have hnp : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ Int.gcd m n := by
rw [h]
norm_cast
exact mt Nat.dvd_one.mp (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp)
rcases Int.Prime.dvd_mul hp hp2 with hp2m | hpn
· rw [Int.natAbs_mul] at hp2m
rcases (Nat.Prime.dvd_mul hp).mp hp2m with hp2 | hpm
· have hp2' : p = 2 := (Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two hp2).antisymm hp.two_le
revert hp1
rw [hp2']
apply mt Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
simp only [sq, Nat.cast_ofNat, Int.sub_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn,
mul_zero, EuclideanDomain.zero_mod, mul_one, zero_sub]
decide
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpm)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : n * n = -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + m * m)]
exact hp1.neg_right.add ((Int.natCast_dvd.2 hpm).mul_right _)
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hnp
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : m * m = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 + n * n)]
apply dvd_add hp1
exact (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn).mul_right n
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : 2 * m * n = 2 * n * m), (by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2)]
apply coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(hmn : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) :
Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rcases hmn with h1 | h2
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd h h1.left h1.right
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even h h2.left h2.right
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨m0, hm2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hm)
obtain ⟨n0, hn2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hn)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hm2 hn2
subst m
subst n
have h1 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 + (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 + n0 ^ 2 + m0 + n0) + 1) := by
ring
have h2 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 - n0 ^ 2 + m0 - n0)) := by ring
have h3 : ((m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 := by
rw [h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left, Int.mul_emod_right]
decide
refine ⟨⟨_, h1⟩, ⟨_, h2⟩, h3, ?_⟩
have h20 : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by decide
rw [h1, h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20]
by_contra h4
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp h4
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
apply Nat.dvd_gcd
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_add hp1 hp2
ring
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1
ring
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_aux (hc : x.gcd y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) {m n : ℤ}
(hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) (hv2 : (x : ℚ) / z = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(hw2 : (y : ℚ) / z = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(H : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1) (co : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(pp : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
have hz : z ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hzpos
have h2 : y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos hm2n2 (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) H
rw [hw2]
norm_cast
use m, n
apply And.intro _ (And.intro co pp)
right
refine ⟨?_, h2.left⟩
rw [← Rat.coe_int_inj _ _, ← div_left_inj' ((mt (Rat.coe_int_inj z 0).mp) hz), hv2, h2.right]
norm_cast
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hyo : y % 2 = 1)
(hzpos : 0 < z) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases h0 : x = 0
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left hc h0
let v := (x : ℚ) / z
let w := (y : ℚ) / z
have hq : v ^ 2 + w ^ 2 = 1 := by
field_simp [v, w, sq]
norm_cast
have hvz : v ≠ 0 := by
field_simp [v]
exact h0
have hw1 : w ≠ -1 := by
contrapose! hvz with hw1
rw [hw1, neg_sq, one_pow, add_eq_right] at hq
exact pow_eq_zero hq
have hQ : ∀ x : ℚ, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by
intro q
apply ne_of_gt
exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg q)
have hp : (⟨v, w⟩ : ℚ × ℚ) ∈ { p : ℚ × ℚ | p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } := ⟨hq, hw1⟩
let q := (circleEquivGen hQ).symm ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩
have ht4 : v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) ∧ w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by
apply Prod.mk.inj
exact congr_arg Subtype.val ((circleEquivGen hQ).apply_symm_apply ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩).symm
let m := (q.den : ℤ)
let n := q.num
have hm0 : m ≠ 0 := by
-- Added to adapt to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734.
-- Without `unfold`, `norm_cast` can't see the coercion.
-- One might try `zeta := true` in `Tactic.NormCast.derive`,
-- but that seems to break many other things.
unfold m
norm_cast
apply Rat.den_nz q
have hq2 : q = n / m := (Rat.num_div_den q).symm
have hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by positivity
have hm2n20 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have hx1 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
(1 - (j / k) ^ 2) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = (k ^ 2 - j ^ 2) / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) := by
field_simp
have hw2 : w = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.2
_ = (1 - (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx1 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hx2 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
2 * (j / k) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = 2 * k * j / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) :=
have h₃ : k * (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero h₁ h₂
by field_simp; ring
have hv2 : v = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.1
_ = 2 * (n / m) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx2 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hnmcp : Int.gcd n m = 1 := q.reduced
have hmncp : Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd_comm]
exact hnmcp
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with hm2 | hm2 <;>
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with hn2 | hn2
· -- m even, n even
exfalso
have h1 : 2 ∣ (Int.gcd n m : ℤ) :=
Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hn2) (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hm2)
rw [hnmcp] at h1
revert h1
decide
· -- m even, n odd
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_left
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
· apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n even
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_right
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n odd
exfalso
have h1 :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 :=
coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
have h2 : y = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 ∧ z = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos _ (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) h1.2.2.2
· show w = _
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← Rat.divInt_mul_right (by norm_num : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0)]
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.2.1, hw2, Rat.divInt_eq_div]
norm_cast
· apply (mul_lt_mul_right (by norm_num : 0 < (2 : ℤ))).mp
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, zero_mul]
exact hm2n2
norm_num [h2.1, h1.2.2.1] at hyo
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
rcases h.even_odd_of_coprime hc with h1 | h2
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h1.right hzpos
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hc
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.symm.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h2.left hzpos
use m, n; tauto
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases hz : 0 < z
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc hz
have h' : PythagoreanTriple x y (-z) := by simpa [PythagoreanTriple, neg_mul_neg] using h.eq
apply h'.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc
apply lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h'.ne_zero_of_coprime hc).symm
exact le_neg.mp (not_lt.mp hz)
theorem classified : h.IsClassified := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
use 0, 1, 0
field_simp [hx, hy]
apply h.isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified
apply h.normalize.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime
apply Int.gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
theorem coprime_classification :
PythagoreanTriple x y z ∧ Int.gcd x y = 1 ↔
∃ m n,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
(z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∨ z = -(m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.left.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime h.right
use m, n
rcases H with ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co, pp⟩
· refine ⟨Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· delta PythagoreanTriple
rintro ⟨m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl, co, pp⟩ <;>
first
| constructor; ring; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
| constructor; ring; rw [Int.gcd_comm]; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
/-- By assuming `x` is odd and `z` is positive we get a slightly more precise classification of
the Pythagorean triple `x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = z ^ 2`. -/
theorem coprime_classification' {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
(h_coprime : Int.gcd x y = 1) (h_parity : x % 2 = 1) (h_pos : 0 < z) :
∃ m n,
x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
y = 2 * m * n ∧
z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) ∧ 0 ≤ m := by
obtain ⟨m, n, ht1, ht2, ht3, ht4⟩ :=
PythagoreanTriple.coprime_classification.mp (And.intro h h_coprime)
rcases le_or_lt 0 m with hm | hm
· use m, n
rcases ht1 with h_odd | h_even
· apply And.intro h_odd.1
apply And.intro h_odd.2
rcases ht2 with h_pos | h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos (And.intro ht3 (And.intro ht4 hm))
· exfalso
revert h_pos
rw [h_neg]
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m) (sq_nonneg n))))
exfalso
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_emod_right] at h_parity
exact zero_ne_one h_parity
· use -m, -n
rcases ht1 with h_odd | h_even
· rw [neg_sq m]
rw [neg_sq n]
apply And.intro h_odd.1
constructor
· rw [h_odd.2]
ring
rcases ht2 with h_pos | h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos
constructor
· delta Int.gcd
rw [Int.natAbs_neg, Int.natAbs_neg]
exact ht3
· rw [Int.neg_emod_two, Int.neg_emod_two]
apply And.intro ht4
omega
· exfalso
| revert h_pos
rw [h_neg]
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m) (sq_nonneg n))))
exfalso
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_emod_right] at h_parity
exact zero_ne_one h_parity
/-- **Formula for Pythagorean Triples** -/
theorem classification :
PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔
∃ k m n,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
(z = k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ∨ z = -k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨k, m, n, H⟩ := h.classified
use k, m, n
rcases H with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· refine ⟨Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· rintro ⟨k, m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl⟩ <;> delta PythagoreanTriple <;> ring
end PythagoreanTriple
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 629 | 677 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
/-!
# Orthogonal complements of submodules
In this file, the `orthogonal` complement of a submodule `K` is defined, and basic API established.
Some of the more subtle results about the orthogonal complement are delayed to
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection`.
See also `BilinForm.orthogonal` for orthogonality with respect to a general bilinear form.
## Notation
The orthogonal complement of a submodule `K` is denoted by `Kᗮ`.
The proposition that two submodules are orthogonal, `Submodule.IsOrtho`, is denoted by `U ⟂ V`.
Note this is not the same unicode symbol as `⊥` (`Bot`).
-/
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
namespace Submodule
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- The subspace of vectors orthogonal to a given subspace, denoted `Kᗮ`. -/
def orthogonal : Submodule 𝕜 E where
carrier := { v | ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 }
zero_mem' _ _ := inner_zero_right _
add_mem' hx hy u hu := by rw [inner_add_right, hx u hu, hy u hu, add_zero]
smul_mem' c x hx u hu := by rw [inner_smul_right, hx u hu, mul_zero]
@[inherit_doc]
notation:1200 K "ᗮ" => orthogonal K
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`, with the inner product the
other way round. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal' (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 := by
simp_rw [mem_orthogonal, inner_eq_zero_symm]
variable {K}
/-- A vector in `K` is orthogonal to one in `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal v).1 hv u hu
/-- A vector in `Kᗮ` is orthogonal to one in `K`. -/
theorem inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]; exact inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal hu hv
/-- A vector is in `(𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ` iff it is orthogonal to `u`. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right {u v : E} : v ∈ (𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ ↔ ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 := by
refine ⟨inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (mem_span_singleton_self u), ?_⟩
| intro hv w hw
rw [mem_span_singleton] at hw
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Orthogonal.lean | 68 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
/-!
# Pointwise instances on `Submonoid`s and `AddSubmonoid`s
This file provides:
* `Submonoid.inv`
* `AddSubmonoid.neg`
and the actions
* `Submonoid.pointwiseMulAction`
* `AddSubmonoid.pointwiseAddAction`
which matches the action of `Set.mulActionSet`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the lemmas in this file are direct copies of lemmas from
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Basic` and `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic`.
While the statements of these lemmas are defeq, we repeat them here due to them not being
syntactically equal. Before adding new lemmas here, consider if they would also apply to the action
on `Set`s.
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
open Set Pointwise
variable {α G M R A S : Type*}
variable [Monoid M] [AddMonoid A]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma coe_mul_coe [SetLike S M] [SubmonoidClass S M] (H : S) : H * H = (H : Set M) := by
aesop (add simp mem_mul)
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_set_pow [SetLike S M] [SubmonoidClass S M] :
∀ {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (H : S), (H ^ n : Set M) = H
| 1, _, H => by simp
| n + 2, _, H => by rw [pow_succ, coe_set_pow n.succ_ne_zero, coe_mul_coe]
/-! Some lemmas about pointwise multiplication and submonoids. Ideally we put these in
`GroupTheory.Submonoid.Basic`, but currently we cannot because that file is imported by this. -/
namespace Submonoid
variable {s t u : Set M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset {S : Submonoid M} (hs : s ⊆ S) (ht : t ⊆ S) : s * t ⊆ S :=
mul_subset_iff.2 fun _x hx _y hy ↦ mul_mem (hs hx) (ht hy)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_closure (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : s * t ⊆ Submonoid.closure u :=
mul_subset (Subset.trans hs Submonoid.subset_closure) (Subset.trans ht Submonoid.subset_closure)
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_mul_self_eq (s : Submonoid M) : (s : Set M) * s = s := by
ext x
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨x, h, 1, s.one_mem, mul_one x⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact s.mul_mem ha hb
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_mul_le (S T : Set M) : closure (S * T) ≤ closure S ⊔ closure T :=
sInf_le fun _x ⟨_s, hs, _t, ht, hx⟩ => hx ▸
(closure S ⊔ closure T).mul_mem (SetLike.le_def.mp le_sup_left <| subset_closure hs)
(SetLike.le_def.mp le_sup_right <| subset_closure ht)
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_pow_le : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → closure (s ^ n) ≤ closure s
| 1, _ => by simp
| n + 2, _ =>
calc
closure (s ^ (n + 2))
_ = closure (s ^ (n + 1) * s) := by rw [pow_succ]
_ ≤ closure (s ^ (n + 1)) ⊔ closure s := closure_mul_le ..
_ ≤ closure s ⊔ closure s := by gcongr ?_ ⊔ _; exact closure_pow_le n.succ_ne_zero
_ = closure s := sup_idem _
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_pow {n : ℕ} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (hn : n ≠ 0) : closure (s ^ n) = closure s :=
(closure_pow_le hn).antisymm <| by gcongr; exact subset_pow hs hn
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_eq_closure_mul (H K : Submonoid M) : H ⊔ K = closure ((H : Set M) * (K : Set M)) :=
le_antisymm
(sup_le (fun h hh => subset_closure ⟨h, hh, 1, K.one_mem, mul_one h⟩) fun k hk =>
subset_closure ⟨1, H.one_mem, k, hk, one_mul k⟩)
((closure_mul_le _ _).trans <| by rw [closure_eq, closure_eq])
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_smul_mem_closure_smul {N : Type*} [CommMonoid N] [MulAction M N] [IsScalarTower M N N]
(r : M) (s : Set N) {x : N} (hx : x ∈ closure s) : ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n • x ∈ closure (r • s) := by
induction hx using closure_induction with
| mem x hx => exact ⟨1, subset_closure ⟨_, hx, by rw [pow_one]⟩⟩
| one => exact ⟨0, by simpa using one_mem _⟩
| mul x y _ _ hx hy =>
obtain ⟨⟨nx, hx⟩, ⟨ny, hy⟩⟩ := And.intro hx hy
use ny + nx
rw [pow_add, mul_smul, ← smul_mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← smul_mul_assoc]
exact mul_mem hy hx
variable [Group G]
/-- The submonoid with every element inverted. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid with every element negated."]
protected def inv : Inv (Submonoid G) where
inv S :=
{ carrier := (S : Set G)⁻¹
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => by rw [mem_inv, mul_inv_rev]; exact mul_mem hb ha
one_mem' := mem_inv.2 <| by rw [inv_one]; exact S.one_mem' }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submonoid.inv AddSubmonoid.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inv (S : Submonoid G) : ↑S⁻¹ = (S : Set G)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inv {g : G} {S : Submonoid G} : g ∈ S⁻¹ ↔ g⁻¹ ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Inversion is involutive on submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Inversion is involutive on additive submonoids."]
def involutiveInv : InvolutiveInv (Submonoid G) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.involutiveInv _ fun _ => rfl
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submonoid.involutiveInv AddSubmonoid.involutiveNeg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_inv (S T : Submonoid G) : S⁻¹ ≤ T⁻¹ ↔ S ≤ T :=
SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans Set.inv_subset_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le (S T : Submonoid G) : S⁻¹ ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T⁻¹ :=
SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans Set.inv_subset
/-- Pointwise inversion of submonoids as an order isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "Pointwise negation of additive submonoids as an order isomorphism"]
def invOrderIso : Submonoid G ≃o Submonoid G where
toEquiv := Equiv.inv _
map_rel_iff' := inv_le_inv _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_inv (s : Set G) : closure s⁻¹ = (closure s)⁻¹ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [closure_le, coe_inv, ← Set.inv_subset, inv_inv]
exact subset_closure
· rw [inv_le, closure_le, coe_inv, ← Set.inv_subset]
exact subset_closure
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_closure_inv (s : Set G) (x : G) : x ∈ closure s⁻¹ ↔ x⁻¹ ∈ closure s := by
rw [closure_inv, mem_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inf (S T : Submonoid G) : (S ⊓ T)⁻¹ = S⁻¹ ⊓ T⁻¹ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.inter_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_sup (S T : Submonoid G) : (S ⊔ T)⁻¹ = S⁻¹ ⊔ T⁻¹ :=
(invOrderIso : Submonoid G ≃o Submonoid G).map_sup S T
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Submonoid G)⁻¹ = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| (Set.inv_singleton 1).trans <| congr_arg _ inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Submonoid G)⁻¹ = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.inv_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_iInf {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submonoid G) : (⨅ i, S i)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (S i)⁻¹ :=
(invOrderIso : Submonoid G ≃o Submonoid G).map_iInf _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_iSup {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submonoid G) : (⨆ i, S i)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (S i)⁻¹ :=
(invOrderIso : Submonoid G ≃o Submonoid G).map_iSup _
end Submonoid
namespace Submonoid
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [MulDistribMulAction α M]
-- todo: add `to_additive`?
/-- The action on a submonoid corresponding to applying the action to every element.
This is available as an instance in the `Pointwise` locale. -/
protected def pointwiseMulAction : MulAction α (Submonoid M) where
smul a S := S.map (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidEnd _ M a)
one_smul S := by
change S.map _ = S
simpa only [map_one] using S.map_id
mul_smul _ _ S :=
(congr_arg (fun f : Monoid.End M => S.map f) (MonoidHom.map_mul _ _ _)).trans
(S.map_map _ _).symm
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submonoid.pointwiseMulAction
@[simp]
theorem coe_pointwise_smul (a : α) (S : Submonoid M) : ↑(a • S) = a • (S : Set M) :=
rfl
theorem smul_mem_pointwise_smul (m : M) (a : α) (S : Submonoid M) : m ∈ S → a • m ∈ a • S :=
(Set.smul_mem_smul_set : _ → _ ∈ a • (S : Set M))
instance : CovariantClass α (Submonoid M) HSMul.hSMul LE.le :=
⟨fun _ _ => image_subset _⟩
theorem mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists (m : M) (a : α) (S : Submonoid M) :
m ∈ a • S ↔ ∃ s : M, s ∈ S ∧ a • s = m :=
(Set.mem_smul_set : m ∈ a • (S : Set M) ↔ _)
@[simp]
theorem smul_bot (a : α) : a • (⊥ : Submonoid M) = ⊥ :=
map_bot _
theorem smul_sup (a : α) (S T : Submonoid M) : a • (S ⊔ T) = a • S ⊔ a • T :=
map_sup _ _ _
theorem smul_closure (a : α) (s : Set M) : a • closure s = closure (a • s) :=
MonoidHom.map_mclosure _ _
lemma pointwise_isCentralScalar [MulDistribMulAction αᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar α M] :
IsCentralScalar α (Submonoid M) :=
⟨fun _ S => (congr_arg fun f : Monoid.End M => S.map f) <| MonoidHom.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul _⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Submonoid.pointwise_isCentralScalar
end Monoid
section Group
variable [Group α] [MulDistribMulAction α M]
@[simp]
theorem smul_mem_pointwise_smul_iff {a : α} {S : Submonoid M} {x : M} : a • x ∈ a • S ↔ x ∈ S :=
smul_mem_smul_set_iff
theorem mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem {a : α} {S : Submonoid M} {x : M} :
x ∈ a • S ↔ a⁻¹ • x ∈ S :=
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem
theorem mem_inv_pointwise_smul_iff {a : α} {S : Submonoid M} {x : M} : x ∈ a⁻¹ • S ↔ a • x ∈ S :=
mem_inv_smul_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem pointwise_smul_le_pointwise_smul_iff {a : α} {S T : Submonoid M} : a • S ≤ a • T ↔ S ≤ T :=
smul_set_subset_smul_set_iff
theorem pointwise_smul_subset_iff {a : α} {S T : Submonoid M} : a • S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ a⁻¹ • T :=
smul_set_subset_iff_subset_inv_smul_set
theorem subset_pointwise_smul_iff {a : α} {S T : Submonoid M} : S ≤ a • T ↔ a⁻¹ • S ≤ T :=
subset_smul_set_iff
end Group
end Submonoid
namespace Set.IsPWO
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α] {s : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem submonoid_closure (hpos : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → 1 ≤ x) (h : s.IsPWO) :
IsPWO (Submonoid.closure s : Set α) := by
rw [Submonoid.closure_eq_image_prod]
refine (h.partiallyWellOrderedOn_sublistForall₂ (· ≤ ·)).image_of_monotone_on ?_
exact fun l1 _ l2 hl2 h12 => h12.prod_le_prod' fun x hx => hpos x <| hl2 x hx
end Set.IsPWO
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Submonoid/Pointwise.lean | 677 | 679 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
/-!
# Braided and symmetric monoidal categories
The basic definitions of braided monoidal categories, and symmetric monoidal categories,
as well as braided functors.
## Implementation note
We make `BraidedCategory` another typeclass, but then have `SymmetricCategory` extend this.
The rationale is that we are not carrying any additional data, just requiring a property.
## Future work
* Construct the Drinfeld center of a monoidal category as a braided monoidal category.
* Say something about pseudo-natural transformations.
## References
* [Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, Victor Ostrik, *Tensor categories*][egno15]
-/
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category MonoidalCategory Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal Functor.Monoidal
/-- A braided monoidal category is a monoidal category equipped with a braiding isomorphism
`β_ X Y : X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X`
which is natural in both arguments,
and also satisfies the two hexagon identities.
-/
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
/-- The braiding natural isomorphism. -/
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
/-- The first hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
/-- The second hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ Z X Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ Y Z X).hom ≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫
(β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (braiding Y Y').hom = (braiding X X').hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by
rw [tensorHom_def' f g, tensorHom_def g f]
simp_rw [Category.assoc, braiding_naturality_left, braiding_naturality_right_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_right (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
X ◁ f ≫ (β_ Z X).inv = (β_ Y X).inv ≫ f ▷ X :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_left f X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ (β_ Z Y).inv = (β_ Z X).inv ≫ Z ◁ f :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_right Z f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (β_ Y' Y).inv = (β_ X' X).inv ≫ (g ⊗ f) :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality g f
/-- In a braided monoidal category, the functors `tensorLeft X` and
`tensorRight X` are isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def tensorLeftIsoTensorRight (X : C) :
tensorLeft X ≅ tensorRight X where
hom := { app Y := (β_ X Y).hom }
inv := { app Y := (β_ X Y).inv }
@[reassoc]
theorem yang_baxter (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X ≫ (α_ Z Y X).hom =
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom := by
rw [← braiding_tensor_right_assoc X Y Z, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).inv]
repeat rw [assoc]
rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, ← braiding_naturality_right, braiding_tensor_right]
theorem yang_baxter' (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ⊗≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X =
𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ⊗≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).hom]
convert yang_baxter X Y Z using 1
all_goals monoidal
theorem yang_baxter_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) ≪≫ (α_ Y Z X).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ Y Z) X ≪≫ (α_ Z Y X) =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y ≪≫ α_ Z X Y ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Z (β_ X Y) := Iso.ext (yang_baxter X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_forward_iso (X Y Z : C) :
α_ X Y Z ≪≫ β_ X (Y ⊗ Z) ≪≫ α_ Y Z X =
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_forward X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_reverse_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≪≫ (α_ Z X Y).symm =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_reverse X Y Z)
@[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_forward_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_reverse_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ (β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv := by
simp
end BraidedCategory
/--
Verifying the axioms for a braiding by checking that the candidate braiding is sent to a braiding
by a faithful monoidal functor.
-/
def braidedCategoryOfFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [MonoidalCategory C]
[MonoidalCategory D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Monoidal] [F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D]
(β : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X)
(w : ∀ X Y, μ F _ _ ≫ F.map (β X Y).hom = (β_ _ _).hom ≫ μ F _ _) : BraidedCategory C where
braiding := β
braiding_naturality_left := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (μ F ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← μ_natural_left_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_left_assoc, μ_natural_right]
braiding_naturality_right := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (μ F ?_ ?_)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, ← μ_natural_right_assoc, w, Functor.map_comp,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc, μ_natural_left]
hexagon_forward := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (μ F _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (μ F _ _ ▷ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
μ_natural_left_assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w,
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity_assoc,
Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity_assoc, ← μ_natural_right, ←
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
reassoc_of% w, braiding_naturality_right_assoc,
Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity, hexagon_forward_assoc]
hexagon_reverse := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
refine (cancel_epi (μ F _ _)).1 ?_
refine (cancel_epi (_ ◁ μ F _ _)).1 ?_
rw [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_comp, ←
μ_natural_right_assoc, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, w,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity_inv_assoc,
Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity_inv_assoc, ← μ_natural_left,
← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, w, comp_whiskerRight_assoc, reassoc_of% w,
braiding_naturality_left_assoc, Functor.LaxMonoidal.associativity_inv, hexagon_reverse_assoc]
/-- Pull back a braiding along a fully faithful monoidal functor. -/
noncomputable def braidedCategoryOfFullyFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
[MonoidalCategory C] [MonoidalCategory D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Monoidal] [F.Full]
[F.Faithful] [BraidedCategory D] : BraidedCategory C :=
braidedCategoryOfFaithful F
(fun X Y => F.preimageIso
((μIso F _ _).symm ≪≫ β_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) ≪≫ (μIso F _ _)))
(by simp)
section
/-!
We now establish how the braiding interacts with the unitors.
I couldn't find a detailed proof in print, but this is discussed in:
* Proposition 1 of André Joyal and Ross Street,
"Braided monoidal categories", Macquarie Math Reports 860081 (1986).
* Proposition 2.1 of André Joyal and Ross Street,
"Braided tensor categories" , Adv. Math. 102 (1993), 20–78.
* Exercise 8.1.6 of Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
"Tensor categories", vol 25, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs (2015), AMS.
-/
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [BraidedCategory C]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv) ≫ (α_ _ X _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ _) =
((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv := by
monoidal
theorem braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C :=
calc
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) =
((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
monoidal
_ = ((β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).hom) ≫
(_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (β_ X _).inv) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫
((λ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ ((λ_ _).hom ▷ X) ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
rw [braiding_leftUnitor_aux₁]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (β_ X _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_right]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (λ_ _).hom) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ 𝟙_ C := by rw [triangle]
@[reassoc]
theorem braiding_leftUnitor (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ (λ_ X).hom = (ρ_ X).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, braiding_leftUnitor_aux₂]
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₁ (X : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫
((β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv ▷ 𝟙_ C) ≫ (α_ _ X _).hom ≫ (_ ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv := by
monoidal
theorem braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂ (X : C) :
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom :=
calc
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) =
(𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
monoidal
_ = (𝟙_ C ◁ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).hom ▷ _) ≫
((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((β_ _ X).inv ▷ _) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (ρ_ X).hom) := by
(slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← hexagon_reverse]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (β_ _ _).hom ≫ (X ◁ (ρ_ _).hom) ≫ (β_ _ X).inv := by simp
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) ≫ (β_ _ X).hom ≫ (β_ _ _).inv := by
(slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← braiding_naturality_left]); simp only [assoc]
_ = (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((ρ_ _).hom ▷ _) := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
_ = 𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X).hom := by rw [triangle_assoc_comp_right]
@[reassoc]
theorem braiding_rightUnitor (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).hom = (λ_ X).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, braiding_rightUnitor_aux₂]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_tensorUnit_left (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
simp [← braiding_rightUnitor]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_inv_tensorUnit_left (X : C) : (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).inv = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_ext]
rw [braiding_tensorUnit_left]
monoidal
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_braiding (X : C) : (λ_ X).inv ≫ (β_ (𝟙_ C) X).hom = (ρ_ X).inv := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_braiding (X : C) : (ρ_ X).inv ≫ (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom = (λ_ X).inv := by
apply (cancel_mono (λ_ X).hom).1
simp only [assoc, braiding_leftUnitor, Iso.inv_hom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_tensorUnit_right (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ (λ_ X).inv := by
simp [← rightUnitor_inv_braiding]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem braiding_inv_tensorUnit_right (X : C) : (β_ X (𝟙_ C)).inv = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_ext]
rw [braiding_tensorUnit_right]
monoidal
end
/--
A symmetric monoidal category is a braided monoidal category for which the braiding is symmetric. -/
@[stacks 0FFW]
class SymmetricCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] extends
BraidedCategory.{v} C where
-- braiding symmetric:
symmetry : ∀ X Y : C, (β_ X Y).hom ≫ (β_ Y X).hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] SymmetricCategory.symmetry
lemma SymmetricCategory.braiding_swap_eq_inv_braiding {C : Type u₁}
[Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [SymmetricCategory C] (X Y : C) :
(β_ Y X).hom = (β_ X Y).inv := Iso.inv_ext' (symmetry X Y)
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C] [BraidedCategory C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory D] [BraidedCategory D]
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] [MonoidalCategory E] [BraidedCategory E]
/-- A lax braided functor between braided monoidal categories is a lax monoidal functor
which preserves the braiding.
-/
class Functor.LaxBraided (F : C ⥤ D) extends F.LaxMonoidal where
braided : ∀ X Y : C, μ F X Y ≫ F.map (β_ X Y).hom =
(β_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)).hom ≫ μ F Y X := by aesop_cat
namespace Functor.LaxBraided
attribute [reassoc] braided
instance id : (𝟭 C).LaxBraided where
instance (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [F.LaxBraided] [G.LaxBraided] :
(F ⋙ G).LaxBraided where
braided X Y := by
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp, braided, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [braided]
simp only [Category.assoc]
end Functor.LaxBraided
section
variable (C D)
/-- Bundled version of lax braided functors. -/
structure LaxBraidedFunctor extends C ⥤ D where
laxBraided : toFunctor.LaxBraided := by infer_instance
namespace LaxBraidedFunctor
variable {C D}
attribute [instance] laxBraided
/-- Constructor for `LaxBraidedFunctor C D`. -/
@[simps toFunctor]
def of (F : C ⥤ D) [F.LaxBraided] : LaxBraidedFunctor C D where
toFunctor := F
/-- The lax monoidal functor induced by a lax braided functor. -/
@[simps toFunctor]
def toLaxMonoidalFunctor (F : LaxBraidedFunctor C D) : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D where
toFunctor := F.toFunctor
instance : Category (LaxBraidedFunctor C D) :=
InducedCategory.category (toLaxMonoidalFunctor)
@[simp]
lemma id_hom (F : LaxBraidedFunctor C D) : LaxMonoidalFunctor.Hom.hom (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma comp_hom {F G H : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) :
(α ≫ β).hom = α.hom ≫ β.hom := rfl
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} {α β : F ⟶ G} (h : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
LaxMonoidalFunctor.hom_ext h
/-- Constructor for morphisms in the category `LaxBraiededFunctor C D`. -/
@[simps]
def homMk {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} (f : F.toFunctor ⟶ G.toFunctor) [NatTrans.IsMonoidal f] :
F ⟶ G := ⟨f, inferInstance⟩
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in the category `LaxBraidedFunctor C D`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} (e : F.toFunctor ≅ G.toFunctor)
[NatTrans.IsMonoidal e.hom] :
F ≅ G where
hom := homMk e.hom
inv := homMk e.inv
/-- The forgetful functor from lax braided functors to lax monoidal functors. -/
@[simps! obj map]
def forget : LaxBraidedFunctor C D ⥤ LaxMonoidalFunctor C D :=
inducedFunctor _
/-- The forgetful functor from lax braided functors to lax monoidal functors
is fully faithful. -/
def fullyFaithfulForget : (forget (C := C) (D := D)).FullyFaithful :=
fullyFaithfulInducedFunctor _
section
variable {F G : LaxBraidedFunctor C D} (e : ∀ X, F.obj X ≅ G.obj X)
(naturality : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), F.map f ≫ (e Y).hom = (e X).hom ≫ G.map f := by
aesop_cat)
(unit : ε F.toFunctor ≫ (e (𝟙_ C)).hom = ε G.toFunctor := by aesop_cat)
(tensor : ∀ X Y, μ F.toFunctor X Y ≫ (e (X ⊗ Y)).hom =
((e X).hom ⊗ (e Y).hom) ≫ μ G.toFunctor X Y := by aesop_cat)
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms between lax braided functors. -/
def isoOfComponents :
F ≅ G :=
fullyFaithfulForget.preimageIso
(LaxMonoidalFunctor.isoOfComponents e naturality unit tensor)
@[simp]
lemma isoOfComponents_hom_hom_app (X : C) :
(isoOfComponents e naturality unit tensor).hom.hom.app X = (e X).hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma isoOfComponents_inv_hom_app (X : C) :
(isoOfComponents e naturality unit tensor).inv.hom.app X = (e X).inv := rfl
end
end LaxBraidedFunctor
end
/-- A braided functor between braided monoidal categories is a monoidal functor
which preserves the braiding.
-/
@[ext]
class Functor.Braided (F : C ⥤ D) extends F.Monoidal, F.LaxBraided where
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Functor.map_braiding (F : C ⥤ D) (X Y : C) [F.Braided] :
F.map (β_ X Y).hom =
δ F X Y ≫ (β_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)).hom ≫ μ F Y X := by
rw [← Functor.Braided.braided, δ_μ_assoc]
/--
A braided category with a faithful braided functor to a symmetric category is itself symmetric.
-/
def symmetricCategoryOfFaithful {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [MonoidalCategory C]
[MonoidalCategory D] [BraidedCategory C] [SymmetricCategory D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Braided]
[F.Faithful] : SymmetricCategory C where
symmetry X Y := F.map_injective (by simp)
namespace Functor.Braided
instance : (𝟭 C).Braided where
instance (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [F.Braided] [G.Braided] : (F ⋙ G).Braided where
lemma toMonoidal_injective (F : C ⥤ D) : Function.Injective
(@Braided.toMonoidal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ : F.Braided → F.Monoidal) := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ rfl; rfl
end Functor.Braided
section CommMonoid
variable (M : Type u) [CommMonoid M]
instance : BraidedCategory (Discrete M) where
braiding X Y := Discrete.eqToIso (mul_comm X.as Y.as)
variable {M} {N : Type u} [CommMonoid N]
/-- A multiplicative morphism between commutative monoids gives a braided functor between
the corresponding discrete braided monoidal categories.
-/
instance Discrete.monoidalFunctorBraided (F : M →* N) :
(Discrete.monoidalFunctor F).Braided where
end CommMonoid
namespace MonoidalCategory
section Tensor
/-- Swap the second and third objects in `(X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⊗ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂)`. This is used to strength the
tensor product functor from `C × C` to `C` as a monoidal functor. -/
def tensorμ (X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C) : (X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⊗ Y₁ ⊗ Y₂ ⟶ (X₁ ⊗ Y₁) ⊗ X₂ ⊗ Y₂ :=
(α_ X₁ X₂ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂)).hom ≫
(X₁ ◁ (α_ X₂ Y₁ Y₂).inv) ≫
(X₁ ◁ (β_ X₂ Y₁).hom ▷ Y₂) ≫
(X₁ ◁ (α_ Y₁ X₂ Y₂).hom) ≫ (α_ X₁ Y₁ (X₂ ⊗ Y₂)).inv
/-- The inverse of `tensorμ`. -/
def tensorδ (X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C) : (X₁ ⊗ Y₁) ⊗ X₂ ⊗ Y₂ ⟶ (X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⊗ Y₁ ⊗ Y₂ :=
(α_ X₁ Y₁ (X₂ ⊗ Y₂)).hom ≫
(X₁ ◁ (α_ Y₁ X₂ Y₂).inv) ≫
(X₁ ◁ (β_ X₂ Y₁).inv ▷ Y₂) ≫
(X₁ ◁ (α_ X₂ Y₁ Y₂).hom) ≫
(α_ X₁ X₂ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂)).inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma tensorμ_tensorδ (X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C) :
tensorμ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ ≫ tensorδ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ = 𝟙 _ := by
simp only [tensorμ, tensorδ, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
hom_inv_whiskerRight_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.inv_hom_id,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma tensorδ_tensorμ (X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C) :
tensorδ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ ≫ tensorμ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ = 𝟙 _ := by
simp only [tensorμ, tensorδ, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
inv_hom_whiskerRight_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.hom_inv_id,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorμ_natural {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ U₁ U₂ V₁ V₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : U₁ ⟶ V₁)
(g₂ : U₂ ⟶ V₂) :
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ g₁ ⊗ g₂) ≫ tensorμ Y₁ Y₂ V₁ V₂ =
tensorμ X₁ X₂ U₁ U₂ ≫ ((f₁ ⊗ g₁) ⊗ f₂ ⊗ g₂) := by
dsimp only [tensorμ]
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, associator_inv_naturality, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← tensor_comp, ← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, comp_id g₂, ← id_comp g₂,
braiding_naturality, tensor_comp, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 4 5 => rw [← tensor_comp, comp_id f₁, ← id_comp f₁, associator_naturality, tensor_comp]
slice_lhs 5 6 => rw [associator_inv_naturality]
simp only [assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorμ_natural_left {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (Z₁ Z₂ : C) :
(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ▷ (Z₁ ⊗ Z₂) ≫ tensorμ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂ =
tensorμ X₁ X₂ Z₁ Z₂ ≫ (f₁ ▷ Z₁ ⊗ f₂ ▷ Z₂) := by
convert tensorμ_natural f₁ f₂ (𝟙 Z₁) (𝟙 Z₂) using 1 <;> simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorμ_natural_right (Z₁ Z₂ : C) {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
(Z₁ ⊗ Z₂) ◁ (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ tensorμ Z₁ Z₂ Y₁ Y₂ =
tensorμ Z₁ Z₂ X₁ X₂ ≫ (Z₁ ◁ f₁ ⊗ Z₂ ◁ f₂) := by
convert tensorμ_natural (𝟙 Z₁) (𝟙 Z₂) f₁ f₂ using 1 <;> simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_left_unitality (X₁ X₂ : C) :
(λ_ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom =
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ▷ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)) ≫
tensorμ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) X₁ X₂ ≫ ((λ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (λ_ X₂).hom) := by
dsimp only [tensorμ]
have :
((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv ▷ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)) ≫
(α_ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom ≫ (𝟙_ C ◁ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X₁ X₂).inv) =
𝟙_ C ◁ (λ_ X₁).inv ▷ X₂ := by
monoidal
slice_rhs 1 3 => rw [this]
clear this
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ← comp_whiskerRight,
leftUnitor_inv_braiding]
simp [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom, tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_right_unitality (X₁ X₂ : C) :
(ρ_ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom =
((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ◁ (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv) ≫
tensorμ X₁ X₂ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) ≫ ((ρ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (ρ_ X₂).hom) := by
dsimp only [tensorμ]
have :
((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ◁ (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv) ≫
(α_ X₁ X₂ (𝟙_ C ⊗ 𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ (X₁ ◁ (α_ X₂ (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C)).inv) =
(α_ X₁ X₂ (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ (X₁ ◁ (ρ_ X₂).inv ▷ 𝟙_ C) := by
monoidal
slice_rhs 1 3 => rw [this]
clear this
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ← comp_whiskerRight,
rightUnitor_inv_braiding]
simp [tensorHom_id, id_tensorHom, tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_associativity (X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂ : C) :
(tensorμ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ ▷ (Z₁ ⊗ Z₂)) ≫
tensorμ (X₁ ⊗ Y₁) (X₂ ⊗ Y₂) Z₁ Z₂ ≫ ((α_ X₁ Y₁ Z₁).hom ⊗ (α_ X₂ Y₂ Z₂).hom) =
(α_ (X₁ ⊗ X₂) (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) (Z₁ ⊗ Z₂)).hom ≫
((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ◁ tensorμ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂) ≫ tensorμ X₁ X₂ (Y₁ ⊗ Z₁) (Y₂ ⊗ Z₂) := by
dsimp only [tensor_obj, prodMonoidal_tensorObj, tensorμ]
simp only [braiding_tensor_left, braiding_tensor_right]
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫
X₁ ◁ ((β_ X₂ Y₁).hom ▷ (Y₂ ⊗ Z₁) ≫ (Y₁ ⊗ X₂) ◁ (β_ Y₂ Z₁).hom) ▷ Z₂ ⊗≫
X₁ ◁ Y₁ ◁ (β_ X₂ Z₁).hom ▷ Y₂ ▷ Z₂ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by monoidal
_ = _ := by rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
instance tensorMonoidal : (tensor C).Monoidal :=
Functor.CoreMonoidal.toMonoidal
{ εIso := (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).symm
μIso := fun X Y ↦
{ hom := tensorμ X.1 X.2 Y.1 Y.2
inv := tensorδ X.1 X.2 Y.1 Y.2 }
μIso_hom_natural_left := fun f Z ↦ tensorμ_natural_left f.1 f.2 Z.1 Z.2
μIso_hom_natural_right := fun Z f ↦ tensorμ_natural_right Z.1 Z.2 f.1 f.2
associativity := fun X Y Z ↦ tensor_associativity X.1 X.2 Y.1 Y.2 Z.1 Z.2
left_unitality := fun ⟨X₁, X₂⟩ ↦ tensor_left_unitality X₁ X₂
right_unitality := fun ⟨X₁, X₂⟩ ↦ tensor_right_unitality X₁ X₂ }
@[simp] lemma tensor_ε : ε (tensor C) = (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).inv := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensor_η : η (tensor C) = (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensor_μ (X Y : C × C) : μ (tensor C) X Y = tensorμ X.1 X.2 Y.1 Y.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensor_δ (X Y : C × C) : δ (tensor C) X Y = tensorδ X.1 X.2 Y.1 Y.2 := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_monoidal (X₁ X₂ : C) :
(λ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (λ_ X₂).hom =
tensorμ (𝟙_ C) X₁ (𝟙_ C) X₂ ≫ ((λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom ▷ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)) ≫ (λ_ (X₁ ⊗ X₂)).hom := by
| dsimp only [tensorμ]
have :
(λ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (λ_ X₂).hom =
(α_ (𝟙_ C) X₁ (𝟙_ C ⊗ X₂)).hom ≫
(𝟙_ C ◁ (α_ X₁ (𝟙_ C) X₂).inv) ≫ (λ_ ((X₁ ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ X₂)).hom ≫ ((ρ_ X₁).hom ▷ X₂) := by
monoidal
rw [this]; clear this
rw [← braiding_leftUnitor]
monoidal
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_monoidal (X₁ X₂ : C) :
(ρ_ X₁).hom ⊗ (ρ_ X₂).hom =
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 666 | 678 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Luke Kershaw. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Kershaw, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.TriangleShift
/-!
# Pretriangulated Categories
This file contains the definition of pretriangulated categories and triangulated functors
between them.
## Implementation Notes
We work under the assumption that pretriangulated categories are preadditive categories,
but not necessarily additive categories, as is assumed in some sources.
TODO: generalise this to n-angulated categories as in https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4592
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Preadditive Limits
universe v v₀ v₁ v₂ u u₀ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Pretriangulated ZeroObject
/-
We work in a preadditive category `C` equipped with an additive shift.
-/
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C]
/-- A preadditive category `C` with an additive shift, and a class of "distinguished triangles"
relative to that shift is called pretriangulated if the following hold:
* Any triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is also distinguished.
* Any triangle of the form `(X,X,0,id,0,0)` is distinguished.
* For any morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` there exists a distinguished triangle of the form `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)`.
* The triangle `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)` is distinguished if and only if `(Y,Z,X⟦1⟧,g,h,-f⟦1⟧)` is.
* Given a diagram:
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
│ │ │
│a │b │a⟦1⟧'
V V V
X' ───> Y' ───> Z' ───> X'⟦1⟧
f' g' h'
```
where the left square commutes, and whose rows are distinguished triangles,
there exists a morphism `c : Z ⟶ Z'` such that `(a,b,c)` is a triangle morphism.
-/
@[stacks 0145]
class Pretriangulated [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (shiftFunctor C n)] where
/-- a class of triangle which are called `distinguished` -/
distinguishedTriangles : Set (Triangle C)
/-- a triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is distinguished -/
isomorphic_distinguished :
∀ T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles, ∀ (T₂) (_ : T₂ ≅ T₁), T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- obvious triangles `X ⟶ X ⟶ 0 ⟶ X⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
contractible_distinguished : ∀ X : C, contractibleTriangle X ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- any morphism `X ⟶ Y` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
distinguished_cocone_triangle :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y),
∃ (Z : C) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- a triangle is distinguished iff it is so after rotating it -/
rotate_distinguished_triangle :
∀ T : Triangle C, T ∈ distinguishedTriangles ↔ T.rotate ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- given two distinguished triangle, a commutative square
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism :
∀ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C) (_ : T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles) (_ : T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles)
(a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂) (_ : T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁),
∃ c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃, T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ ∧ T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃
namespace Pretriangulated
variable [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n)] [hC : Pretriangulated C]
-- Porting note: increased the priority so that we can write `T ∈ distTriang C`, and
-- not just `T ∈ (distTriang C)`
/-- distinguished triangles in a pretriangulated category -/
notation:60 "distTriang " C => @distinguishedTriangles C _ _ _ _ _ _
variable {C}
lemma distinguished_iff_of_iso {T₁ T₂ : Triangle C} (e : T₁ ≅ T₂) :
(T₁ ∈ distTriang C) ↔ T₂ ∈ distTriang C :=
⟨fun hT₁ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₁ _ e.symm,
fun hT₂ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₂ _ e⟩
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) : T.rotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T).mp H
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.inv_rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem inv_rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.invRotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T.invRotate).mpr
(isomorphic_distinguished T H T.invRotate.rotate (invRotCompRot.app T))
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `f ≫ g = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ (T) (H : T ∈ (distTriang C)) : T.mor₁ ≫ T.mor₂ = 0 := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ :=
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _ (contractible_distinguished T.obj₁) H (𝟙 T.obj₁)
T.mor₁ rfl
simpa only [contractibleTriangle_mor₂, zero_comp] using hc.left.symm
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `g ≫ h = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₂₃ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₂ ≫ T.mor₃ = 0 :=
comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `h ≫ f⟦1⟧ = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₃₁ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₃ ≫ T.mor₁⟦1⟧' = 0 := by
have H₂ := rot_of_distTriang T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
simpa using comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate.rotate H₂
/-- The short complex `T.obj₁ ⟶ T.obj₂ ⟶ T.obj₃` attached to a distinguished triangle. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangle (T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) : ShortComplex C :=
ShortComplex.mk T.mor₁ T.mor₂ (comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ _ hT)
/-- The isomorphism between the short complex attached to
two isomorphic distinguished triangles. -/
@[simps!]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangleIsoOfIso {T T' : Triangle C} (e : T ≅ T') (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) :
shortComplexOfDistTriangle T hT ≅ shortComplexOfDistTriangle T'
(isomorphic_distinguished _ hT _ e.symm) :=
ShortComplex.isoMk (Triangle.π₁.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₂.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₃.mapIso e)
/-- Any morphism `Y ⟶ Z` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₁ {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
∃ (X : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨X', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle g
exact ⟨_, _, _, inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem⟩
/-- Any morphism `Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₂ {Z X : C} (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) :
∃ (Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨Y', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle h
let T' := (Triangle.mk h f' g').invRotate.invRotate
refine ⟨T'.obj₂, ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X).hom ≫ T'.mor₁, T'.mor₂,
isomorphic_distinguished _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem)) _ ?_⟩
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
(by dsimp; simp only [shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app, id_comp])
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₂` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₁ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂) :
∃ (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧
T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) b c comm
refine ⟨(shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).preimage a, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· apply (shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).map_injective
dsimp at ha₂
rw [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] at ha₂
simpa only [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_preimage] using ha₂
| · simpa only [Functor.map_preimage] using ha₁
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₃` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₂ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃) :
∃ (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧ T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) (c⟦(-1 : ℤ)⟧') a (by
dsimp
simp only [neg_comp, comp_neg, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, ← comm,
Functor.map_comp, shift_shift_neg', Functor.id_obj, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_id])
refine ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ?_⟩⟩
dsimp only [Triangle.invRotate, Triangle.mk] at ha₂
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/Pretriangulated.lean | 192 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
| @[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 871 | 872 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Base
/-!
# Akra-Bazzi theorem: The polynomial growth condition
This file defines and develops an API for the polynomial growth condition that appears in the
statement of the Akra-Bazzi theorem: for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to hold, the function `g` must
satisfy the condition that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for u between b*n and n for any constant
`b ∈ (0,1)`.
## Implementation notes
Our definition states that the condition must hold for any `b ∈ (0,1)`. This is equivalent to
only requiring it for `b = 1/2` or any other particular value between 0 and 1. While this
could in principle make it harder to prove that a particular function grows polynomially,
this issue doesn't seem to arise in practice.
-/
open Finset Real Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Topology
namespace AkraBazziRecurrence
/-- The growth condition that the function `g` must satisfy for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to apply.
It roughly states that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for `u` between `b*n` and `n` for any
constant `b ∈ (0,1)`. -/
def GrowsPolynomially (f : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1, ∃ c₁ > 0, ∃ c₂ > 0,
∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (f x)) (c₂ * f x)
namespace GrowsPolynomially
lemma congr_of_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) (hg : GrowsPolynomially g) :
GrowsPolynomially f := by
intro b hb
have hg' := hg b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hg'⟩ := hg'
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hg', (tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hfg, hfg]
with x hx₁ hx₂ hx₃
intro u hu
rw [hx₂ u hu.1, hx₃]
exact hx₁ u hu
lemma iff_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (h : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) :
GrowsPolynomially f ↔ GrowsPolynomially g :=
⟨fun hf => congr_of_eventuallyEq h.symm hf, fun hg => congr_of_eventuallyEq h hg⟩
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ}
lemma eventually_atTop_le {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ≤ c * f x := by
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, hc₂, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂, hc₂, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).2
lemma eventually_atTop_le_nat {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * n) n, f u ≤ c * f n := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := hf.eventually_atTop_le hb
exact ⟨c, hc_mem, hc.natCast_atTop⟩
lemma eventually_atTop_ge {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, c * f x ≤ f u := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁, c₂, _, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).1
lemma eventually_atTop_ge_nat {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * n) n, c * f n ≤ f u := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := hf.eventually_atTop_ge hb
exact ⟨c, hc_mem, hc.natCast_atTop⟩
lemma eventually_zero_of_frequently_zero (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) (hf' : ∃ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0) :
∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0 := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf (1/2) (by norm_num)
rw [frequently_atTop] at hf'
filter_upwards [eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr hf, eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx hx_pos
obtain ⟨x₀, hx₀_ge, hx₀⟩ := hf' (max x 1)
have x₀_pos := calc
0 < 1 := by norm_num
_ ≤ x₀ := le_of_max_le_right hx₀_ge
have hmain : ∀ (m : ℕ) (z : ℝ), x ≤ z →
z ∈ Set.Icc ((2 : ℝ)^(-(m : ℤ) -1) * x₀) ((2 : ℝ)^(-(m : ℤ)) * x₀) → f z = 0 := by
intro m
induction m with
| zero =>
simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, neg_zero, zero_sub, zpow_zero, one_mul] at *
specialize hx x₀ (le_of_max_le_left hx₀_ge)
simp only [hx₀, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
refine fun z _ hz => hx _ ?_
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one] at hz
simp only [one_div, hz]
| succ k ih =>
intro z hxz hz
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at *
have hx' : x ≤ (2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀ := by
calc x ≤ z := hxz
_ ≤ _ := by simp only [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hz; exact hz.2
specialize hx ((2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀) hx' z
specialize ih ((2 : ℝ)^(-(k : ℤ) - 1) * x₀) hx' ?ineq
case ineq =>
rw [Set.left_mem_Icc]
gcongr
· norm_num
· omega
simp only [ih, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
refine hx ⟨?lb₁, ?ub₁⟩
case lb₁ =>
rw [one_div, ← zpow_neg_one, ← mul_assoc, ← zpow_add₀ (by norm_num)]
have h₁ : (-1 : ℤ) + (-k - 1) = -k - 2 := by ring
have h₂ : -(k + (1 : ℤ)) - 1 = -k - 2 := by ring
rw [h₁]
rw [h₂] at hz
exact hz.1
case ub₁ =>
have := hz.2
simp only [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at this
exact this
refine hmain ⌊-logb 2 (x / x₀)⌋₊ x le_rfl ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
rw [← le_div_iff₀ x₀_pos]
refine (logb_le_logb (b := 2) (by norm_num) (zpow_pos (by norm_num) _)
(by positivity)).mp ?_
rw [← rpow_intCast, logb_rpow (by norm_num) (by norm_num), ← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp only [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_one, neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add]
calc -logb 2 (x/x₀) ≤ ⌈-logb 2 (x/x₀)⌉₊ := Nat.le_ceil (-logb 2 (x / x₀))
_ ≤ _ := by rw [add_comm]; exact_mod_cast Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one _
case ub =>
rw [← div_le_iff₀ x₀_pos]
refine (logb_le_logb (b := 2) (by norm_num) (by positivity)
(zpow_pos (by norm_num) _)).mp ?_
rw [← rpow_intCast, logb_rpow (by norm_num) (by norm_num), ← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp only [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, neg_neg]
have : 0 ≤ -logb 2 (x / x₀) := by
rw [neg_nonneg]
refine logb_nonpos (by norm_num) (by positivity) ?_
rw [div_le_one x₀_pos]
exact le_of_max_le_left hx₀_ge
exact_mod_cast Nat.floor_le this
lemma eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 ≤ f x) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x ≤ 0) := by
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, _, h⟩ := hf (1/2) (by norm_num)
match lt_trichotomy c₁ c₂ with
| .inl hlt => -- c₁ < c₂
left
filter_upwards [h, eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hx hx_nonneg
have h' : 3 / 4 * x ∈ Set.Icc (1 / 2 * x) x := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
exact ⟨by gcongr ?_ * x; norm_num, by linarith⟩
have hu := hx (3/4 * x) h'
have hu := Set.nonempty_of_mem hu
rw [Set.nonempty_Icc] at hu
have hu' : 0 ≤ (c₂ - c₁) * f x := by linarith
exact nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right hu' (by linarith)
| .inr (.inr hgt) => -- c₂ < c₁
right
filter_upwards [h, eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hx hx_nonneg
have h' : 3 / 4 * x ∈ Set.Icc (1 / 2 * x) x := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
exact ⟨by gcongr ?_ * x; norm_num, by linarith⟩
have hu := hx (3/4 * x) h'
have hu := Set.nonempty_of_mem hu
rw [Set.nonempty_Icc] at hu
have hu' : (c₁ - c₂) * f x ≤ 0 := by linarith
exact nonpos_of_mul_nonpos_right hu' (by linarith)
| .inr (.inl heq) => -- c₁ = c₂
have hmain : ∃ c, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = c := by
simp only [heq, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff, one_mul] at h
rw [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ := h
refine ⟨f (max n₀ 2), ?_⟩
rw [eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨max n₀ 2, ?_⟩
refine Real.induction_Ico_mul _ 2 (by norm_num) (by positivity) ?base ?step
case base =>
intro x ⟨hxlb, hxub⟩
have h₁ := calc n₀ ≤ 1 * max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ 2 * max n₀ 2 := by gcongr; norm_num
have h₂ := hn₀ (2 * max n₀ 2) h₁ (max n₀ 2) ⟨by simp [hxlb], by linarith⟩
rw [h₂]
exact hn₀ (2 * max n₀ 2) h₁ x ⟨by simp [hxlb], le_of_lt hxub⟩
case step =>
intro n hn hyp_ind z hz
have z_nonneg : 0 ≤ z := by
calc (0 : ℝ) ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := by
exact mul_nonneg (pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _) (by norm_num)
_ ≤ z := by exact_mod_cast hz.1
have le_2n : max n₀ 2 ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← one_mul (max n₀ 2)]
gcongr
exact one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) ≤ 2)
have n₀_le_z : n₀ ≤ z := by
calc n₀ ≤ max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ)^n * max n₀ 2 := le_2n
_ ≤ _ := by exact_mod_cast hz.1
have fz_eq_c₂fz : f z = c₂ * f z := hn₀ z n₀_le_z z ⟨by linarith, le_rfl⟩
have z_to_half_z' : f (1/2 * z) = c₂ * f z := hn₀ z n₀_le_z (1/2 * z) ⟨le_rfl, by linarith⟩
have z_to_half_z : f (1/2 * z) = f z := by rwa [← fz_eq_c₂fz] at z_to_half_z'
have half_z_to_base : f (1/2 * z) = f (max n₀ 2) := by
refine hyp_ind (1/2 * z) ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
calc max n₀ 2 ≤ ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ) ^ 1 * max n₀ 2 := by simp
_ ≤ ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ) ^ n * max n₀ 2 := by gcongr; norm_num
_ ≤ _ := by rw [mul_assoc]; gcongr; exact_mod_cast hz.1
case ub =>
have h₁ : (2 : ℝ)^n = ((1 : ℝ)/(2 : ℝ)) * (2 : ℝ)^(n+1) := by
rw [one_div, pow_add, pow_one]
ring
rw [h₁, mul_assoc]
gcongr
exact_mod_cast hz.2
rw [← z_to_half_z, half_z_to_base]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hmain
cases le_or_lt 0 c with
| inl hpos =>
exact Or.inl <| by filter_upwards [hc] with _ hc; simpa only [hc]
| inr hneg =>
right
filter_upwards [hc] with x hc
exact le_of_lt <| by simpa only [hc]
lemma eventually_atTop_zero_or_pos_or_neg (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
(∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 < f x) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x < 0) := by
if h : ∃ᶠ x in atTop, f x = 0 then
exact Or.inl <| eventually_zero_of_frequently_zero hf h
else
rw [not_frequently] at h
push_neg at h
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hf with
| inl h' =>
refine Or.inr (Or.inl ?_)
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [eventually_and]
exact ⟨h', by filter_upwards [h] with x hx; exact hx.symm⟩
| inr h' =>
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ?_)
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [eventually_and]
exact ⟨h', h⟩
protected lemma neg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) : GrowsPolynomially (-f) := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂, hc₂_mem, c₁, hc₁_mem, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
intro u hu
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, Set.neg_mem_Icc_iff, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_neg]
exact hx u hu
protected lemma neg_iff {f : ℝ → ℝ} : GrowsPolynomially f ↔ GrowsPolynomially (-f) :=
⟨fun hf => hf.neg, fun hf => by rw [← neg_neg f]; exact hf.neg⟩
protected lemma abs (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) : GrowsPolynomially (fun x => |f x|) := by
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hf with
| inl hf' =>
have hmain : f =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => |f x| := by
filter_upwards [hf'] with x hx
rw [abs_of_nonneg hx]
rw [← iff_eventuallyEq hmain]
exact hf
| inr hf' =>
have hmain : -f =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => |f x| := by
filter_upwards [hf'] with x hx
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, abs_of_nonpos hx]
rw [← iff_eventuallyEq hmain]
exact hf.neg
protected lemma norm (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) : GrowsPolynomially (fun x => ‖f x‖) := by
simp only [norm_eq_abs]
exact hf.abs
end GrowsPolynomially
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ}
lemma growsPolynomially_const {c : ℝ} : GrowsPolynomially (fun _ => c) := by
refine fun _ _ => ⟨1, by norm_num, 1, by norm_num, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [] with x
simp
lemma growsPolynomially_id : GrowsPolynomially (fun x => x) := by
intro b hb
refine ⟨b, hb.1, ?_⟩
refine ⟨1, by norm_num, ?_⟩
filter_upwards with x u hu
simp only [one_mul, gt_iff_lt, not_le, Set.mem_Icc]
exact ⟨hu.1, hu.2⟩
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.mul {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hg : GrowsPolynomially g) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => f x * g x := by
suffices GrowsPolynomially fun x => |f x| * |g x| by
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hf with
| inl hf' =>
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hg with
| inl hg' =>
have hmain : (fun x => f x * g x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => |f x| * |g x| := by
filter_upwards [hf', hg'] with x hx₁ hx₂
rw [abs_of_nonneg hx₁, abs_of_nonneg hx₂]
rwa [iff_eventuallyEq hmain]
| inr hg' =>
have hmain : (fun x => f x * g x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -|f x| * |g x| := by
filter_upwards [hf', hg'] with x hx₁ hx₂
simp [abs_of_nonneg hx₁, abs_of_nonpos hx₂]
simp only [iff_eventuallyEq hmain, neg_mul]
exact this.neg
| inr hf' =>
cases eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos hg with
| inl hg' =>
have hmain : (fun x => f x * g x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -|f x| * |g x| := by
filter_upwards [hf', hg'] with x hx₁ hx₂
rw [abs_of_nonpos hx₁, abs_of_nonneg hx₂, neg_neg]
simp only [iff_eventuallyEq hmain, neg_mul]
exact this.neg
| inr hg' =>
have hmain : (fun x => f x * g x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => |f x| * |g x| := by
filter_upwards [hf', hg'] with x hx₁ hx₂
simp [abs_of_nonpos hx₁, abs_of_nonpos hx₂]
simp only [iff_eventuallyEq hmain, neg_mul]
exact this
intro b hb
have hf := hf.abs b hb
have hg := hg.abs b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨c₃, hc₃_mem, c₄, hc₄_mem, hg⟩ := hg
refine ⟨c₁ * c₃, by show 0 < c₁ * c₃; positivity, ?_⟩
refine ⟨c₂ * c₄, by show 0 < c₂ * c₄; positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hf hg
intro u hu
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb => calc
c₁ * c₃ * (|f x| * |g x|) = (c₁ * |f x|) * (c₃ * |g x|) := by ring
_ ≤ |f u| * |g u| := by
gcongr
· exact (hf u hu).1
· exact (hg u hu).1
case ub => calc
|f u| * |g u| ≤ (c₂ * |f x|) * (c₄ * |g x|) := by
gcongr
· exact (hf u hu).2
· exact (hg u hu).2
_ = c₂ * c₄ * (|f x| * |g x|) := by ring
lemma GrowsPolynomially.const_mul {f : ℝ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
GrowsPolynomially fun x => c * f x :=
GrowsPolynomially.mul growsPolynomially_const hf
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.add {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hg : GrowsPolynomially g) (hf' : 0 ≤ᶠ[atTop] f) (hg' : 0 ≤ᶠ[atTop] g) :
GrowsPolynomially fun x => f x + g x := by
intro b hb
have hf := hf b hb
have hg := hg b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨c₃, hc₃_mem, c₄, _, hg⟩ := hg
refine ⟨min c₁ c₃, by show 0 < min c₁ c₃; positivity, ?_⟩
refine ⟨max c₂ c₄, by show 0 < max c₂ c₄; positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf, hg,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf',
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hg',
eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hf hg hf' hg' hx_pos
intro u hu
have hbx : b * x ≤ x := calc
b * x ≤ 1 * x := by gcongr; exact le_of_lt hb.2
_ = x := by ring
have fx_nonneg : 0 ≤ f x := hf' x hbx
have gx_nonneg : 0 ≤ g x := hg' x hbx
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb => calc
min c₁ c₃ * (f x + g x) = min c₁ c₃ * f x + min c₁ c₃ * g x := by simp only [mul_add]
_ ≤ c₁ * f x + c₃ * g x := by
gcongr
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact min_le_right _ _
_ ≤ f u + g u := by
gcongr
· exact (hf u hu).1
· exact (hg u hu).1
case ub => calc
max c₂ c₄ * (f x + g x) = max c₂ c₄ * f x + max c₂ c₄ * g x := by simp only [mul_add]
_ ≥ c₂ * f x + c₄ * g x := by gcongr
· exact le_max_left _ _
· exact le_max_right _ _
_ ≥ f u + g u := by gcongr
· exact (hf u hu).2
· exact (hg u hu).2
lemma GrowsPolynomially.add_isLittleO {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hfg : g =o[atTop] f) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => f x + g x := by
intro b hb
have hb_ub := hb.2
rw [isLittleO_iff] at hfg
cases hf.eventually_atTop_nonneg_or_nonpos with
| inl hf' => -- f is eventually non-negative
have hf := hf b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁, c₂, hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂, hf⟩ := hf
specialize hfg (c := 1/2) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨c₁ / 3, by positivity, 3*c₂, by positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hfg,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf',
eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hf₁ hfg' hf₂ hx_nonneg
have hbx : b * x ≤ x := by nth_rewrite 2 [← one_mul x]; gcongr
have hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ 1/2 * f x := by
calc ‖g x‖ ≤ 1/2 * ‖f x‖ := hfg' x hbx
_ = 1/2 * f x := by congr; exact norm_of_nonneg (hf₂ _ hbx)
have hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 3/2 * f x := by
calc _ ≤ f x + ‖g x‖ := by gcongr; exact le_norm_self (g x)
_ ≤ f x + 1/2 * f x := by gcongr
_ = 3/2 * f x := by ring
have hx_lb : 1/2 * f x ≤ f x + g x := by
calc f x + g x ≥ f x - ‖g x‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le (g x)
_ ≥ f x - 1/2 * f x := by gcongr
_ = 1/2 * f x := by ring
intro u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩
have hfu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u := hf₂ _ hu_lb
have hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ 1/2 * f u := by
calc ‖g u‖ ≤ 1/2 * ‖f u‖ := hfg' _ hu_lb
_ = 1/2 * f u := by congr; simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self, hfu_nonneg]
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
calc f u + g u ≥ f u - ‖g u‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le _
_ ≥ f u - 1/2 * f u := by gcongr
_ = 1/2 * f u := by ring
_ ≥ 1/2 * (c₁ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).1
_ = c₁/3 * (3/2 * f x) := by ring
_ ≥ c₁/3 * (f x + g x) := by gcongr
case ub =>
calc _ ≤ f u + ‖g u‖ := by gcongr; exact le_norm_self (g u)
_ ≤ f u + 1/2 * f u := by gcongr
_ = 3/2 * f u := by ring
_ ≤ 3/2 * (c₂ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).2
_ = 3*c₂ * (1/2 * f x) := by ring
_ ≤ 3*c₂ * (f x + g x) := by gcongr
| inr hf' => -- f is eventually nonpos
have hf := hf b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁, c₂, hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂, hf⟩ := hf
specialize hfg (c := 1/2) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨3*c₁, by positivity, c₂/3, by positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hfg,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf',
eventually_ge_atTop 0] with x hf₁ hfg' hf₂ hx_nonneg
have hbx : b * x ≤ x := by nth_rewrite 2 [← one_mul x]; gcongr
have hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ -1/2 * f x := by
calc ‖g x‖ ≤ 1/2 * ‖f x‖ := hfg' x hbx
_ = 1/2 * (-f x) := by congr; exact norm_of_nonpos (hf₂ x hbx)
_ = _ := by ring
have hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 1/2 * f x := by
calc _ ≤ f x + ‖g x‖ := by gcongr; exact le_norm_self (g x)
_ ≤ f x + (-1/2 * f x) := by gcongr
_ = 1/2 * f x := by ring
have hx_lb : 3/2 * f x ≤ f x + g x := by
calc f x + g x ≥ f x - ‖g x‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le (g x)
_ ≥ f x + 1/2 * f x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
gcongr
refine le_of_neg_le_neg ?bc.a
rwa [neg_neg, ← neg_mul, ← neg_div]
_ = 3/2 * f x := by ring
intro u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩
have hfu_nonpos : f u ≤ 0 := hf₂ _ hu_lb
have hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ -1/2 * f u := by
calc ‖g u‖ ≤ 1/2 * ‖f u‖ := hfg' _ hu_lb
_ = 1/2 * (-f u) := by congr; exact norm_of_nonpos hfu_nonpos
_ = -1/2 * f u := by ring
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
calc f u + g u ≥ f u - ‖g u‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le _
_ ≥ f u + 1/2 * f u := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
gcongr
refine le_of_neg_le_neg ?_
rwa [neg_neg, ← neg_mul, ← neg_div]
_ = 3/2 * f u := by ring
_ ≥ 3/2 * (c₁ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).1
_ = 3*c₁ * (1/2 * f x) := by ring
_ ≥ 3*c₁ * (f x + g x) := by gcongr
case ub =>
calc _ ≤ f u + ‖g u‖ := by gcongr; exact le_norm_self (g u)
_ ≤ f u - 1/2 * f u := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
gcongr
rwa [← neg_mul, ← neg_div]
_ = 1/2 * f u := by ring
_ ≤ 1/2 * (c₂ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).2
_ = c₂/3 * (3/2 * f x) := by ring
_ ≤ c₂/3 * (f x + g x) := by gcongr
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.inv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
GrowsPolynomially fun x => (f x)⁻¹ := by
cases hf.eventually_atTop_zero_or_pos_or_neg with
| inl hf' =>
refine fun b hb => ⟨1, by simp, 1, by simp, ?_⟩
have hb_pos := hb.1
filter_upwards [hf', (tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf']
with x hx hx'
intro u hu
simp only [hx, inv_zero, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff, hx' u hu.1]
| inr hf_pos_or_neg =>
suffices GrowsPolynomially fun x => |(f x)⁻¹| by
cases hf_pos_or_neg with
| inl hf' =>
have hmain : (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => |(f x)⁻¹| := by
filter_upwards [hf'] with x hx₁
rw [abs_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx₁))]
rwa [iff_eventuallyEq hmain]
| inr hf' =>
have hmain : (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -|(f x)⁻¹| := by
filter_upwards [hf'] with x hx₁
simp [abs_of_nonpos (inv_nonpos.mpr (le_of_lt hx₁))]
rw [iff_eventuallyEq hmain]
exact this.neg
have hf' : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, f x ≠ 0 := by
cases hf_pos_or_neg with
| inl H => filter_upwards [H] with _ hx; exact (ne_of_lt hx).symm
| inr H => filter_upwards [H] with _ hx; exact (ne_of_gt hx).symm
simp only [abs_inv]
have hf := hf.abs
intro b hb
have hb_pos := hb.1
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hf⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂⁻¹, by show 0 < c₂⁻¹; positivity, ?_⟩
refine ⟨c₁⁻¹, by show 0 < c₁⁻¹; positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hf, hf', (tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf']
with x hx hx' hx''
intro u hu
have h₁ : 0 < |f u| := by rw [abs_pos]; exact hx'' u hu.1
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb =>
rw [← mul_inv]
gcongr
exact (hx u hu).2
case ub =>
rw [← mul_inv]
gcongr
exact (hx u hu).1
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.div {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hg : GrowsPolynomially g) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => f x / g x := by
have : (fun x => f x / g x) = fun x => f x * (g x)⁻¹ := by ext; rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [this]
exact GrowsPolynomially.mul hf (GrowsPolynomially.inv hg)
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.rpow (p : ℝ) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hf_nonneg : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 ≤ f x) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => (f x) ^ p := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, (hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁), c₂, hc₂_mem, hfnew⟩ := hf b hb
have hc₁p : 0 < c₁ ^ p := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hc₁_mem _
have hc₂p : 0 < c₂ ^ p := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hc₂_mem _
cases le_or_lt 0 p with
| inl => -- 0 ≤ p
refine ⟨c₁^p, hc₁p, ?_⟩
refine ⟨c₂^p, hc₂p, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0, hfnew, hf_nonneg,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hf_nonneg]
with x _ hf₁ hf_nonneg hf_nonneg₂
intro u hu
have fu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u := hf_nonneg₂ u hu.1
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb => calc
c₁^p * (f x)^p = (c₁ * f x)^p := by rw [mul_rpow (le_of_lt hc₁_mem) hf_nonneg]
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u hu).1
case ub => calc
(f u)^p ≤ (c₂ * f x)^p := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u hu).2
_ = _ := by rw [← mul_rpow (le_of_lt hc₂_mem) hf_nonneg]
| inr hp => -- p < 0
match hf.eventually_atTop_zero_or_pos_or_neg with
| .inl hzero => -- eventually zero
refine ⟨1, by norm_num, 1, by norm_num, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hzero, hfnew] with x hx hx'
intro u hu
simp only [hx, ne_eq, zero_rpow (ne_of_lt hp), mul_zero, le_refl, not_true, lt_self_iff_false,
Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
simp only [hx, mul_zero, Set.Icc_self, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx'
rw [hx' u hu, zero_rpow (ne_of_lt hp)]
| .inr (.inl hpos) => -- eventually positive
refine ⟨c₂^p, hc₂p, ?_⟩
refine ⟨c₁^p, hc₁p, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0, hfnew, hpos,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hpos]
with x _ hf₁ hf_pos hf_pos₂
intro u hu
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb => calc
c₂^p * (f x)^p = (c₂ * f x)^p := by rw [mul_rpow (le_of_lt hc₂_mem) (le_of_lt hf_pos)]
_ ≤ _ := rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos (hf_pos₂ u hu.1) (hf₁ u hu).2 (le_of_lt hp)
case ub => calc
(f u)^p ≤ (c₁ * f x)^p := by
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos (by positivity) (hf₁ u hu).1 (le_of_lt hp)
_ = _ := by rw [← mul_rpow (le_of_lt hc₁_mem) (le_of_lt hf_pos)]
| .inr (.inr hneg) => -- eventually negative (which is impossible)
have : ∀ᶠ (_ : ℝ) in atTop, False := by
filter_upwards [hf_nonneg, hneg] with x hx hx'; linarith
rw [Filter.eventually_false_iff_eq_bot] at this
exact False.elim <| (atTop_neBot).ne this
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.pow (p : ℕ) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hf_nonneg : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 ≤ f x) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => (f x) ^ p := by
simp_rw [← rpow_natCast]
exact hf.rpow p hf_nonneg
protected lemma GrowsPolynomially.zpow (p : ℤ) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
(hf_nonneg : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, 0 ≤ f x) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => (f x) ^ p := by
simp_rw [← rpow_intCast]
exact hf.rpow p hf_nonneg
lemma growsPolynomially_rpow (p : ℝ) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => x ^ p :=
(growsPolynomially_id).rpow p (eventually_ge_atTop 0)
lemma growsPolynomially_pow (p : ℕ) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => x ^ p :=
(growsPolynomially_id).pow p (eventually_ge_atTop 0)
lemma growsPolynomially_zpow (p : ℤ) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => x ^ p :=
(growsPolynomially_id).zpow p (eventually_ge_atTop 0)
|
lemma growsPolynomially_log : GrowsPolynomially Real.log := by
intro b hb
have hb₀ : 0 < b := hb.1
refine ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, ?_⟩
refine ⟨1, by norm_num, ?_⟩
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => 1 / 2 * Real.log x) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.const_mul_atTop (by norm_num) Real.tendsto_log_atTop
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1,
(tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
<| h_tendsto.eventually (eventually_gt_atTop (-Real.log b)) ] with x hx_pos hx
intro u hu
refine ⟨?lb, ?ub⟩
case lb => calc
1 / 2 * Real.log x = Real.log x + (-1 / 2) * Real.log x := by ring
_ ≤ Real.log x + Real.log b := by
gcongr
rw [neg_div, neg_mul, ← neg_le]
refine le_of_lt (hx x ?_)
calc b * x ≤ 1 * x := by gcongr; exact le_of_lt hb.2
_ = x := by rw [one_mul]
_ = Real.log (b * x) := by rw [← Real.log_mul (by positivity) (by positivity), mul_comm]
_ ≤ Real.log u := by gcongr; exact hu.1
case ub =>
rw [one_mul]
gcongr
· calc 0 < b * x := by positivity
_ ≤ u := by exact hu.1
| Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/GrowsPolynomially.lean | 633 | 660 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma pow_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, a ^ n = 0 → a = 0
| 0, ha => by simpa using congr_arg (a * ·) ha
| n + 1, ha => by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_zero] at ha; exact ha.elim pow_eq_zero id
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨pow_eq_zero, by rintro rfl; exact zero_pow hn⟩
lemma pow_ne_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (pow_eq_zero_iff hn).not
@[field_simps]
lemma pow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h
instance NeZero.pow [NeZero a] : NeZero (a ^ n) := ⟨pow_ne_zero n NeZero.out⟩
lemma sq_eq_zero_iff : a ^ 2 = 0 ↔ a = 0 := pow_eq_zero_iff two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff' [Nontrivial M₀] : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_right_inv_of_exists_left_inv {α} [MonoidWithZero α]
(h : ∀ a : α, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : α, b * a = 1) {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ b : α, a * b = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ := subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· exact ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h b (left_ne_zero_of_mul <| hb.trans_ne one_ne_zero)
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← one_mul (a * b), ← hc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc b, hb, one_mul, hc]
end MonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) CancelMonoidWithZero.to_noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors M₀ :=
⟨fun ab0 => or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ha => mul_left_cancel₀ ha <|
ab0.trans (mul_zero _).symm⟩
| @[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_right_iff : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b ∨ c = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 209 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 907 | 908 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Injective
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.AddCircle
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
/-!
# Character module of a module
For commutative ring `R` and an `R`-module `M` and an injective module `D`, its character module
`M⋆` is defined to be `R`-linear maps `M ⟶ D`.
`M⋆` also has an `R`-module structure given by `(r • f) m = f (r • m)`.
## Main results
- `CharacterModuleFunctor` : the contravariant functor of `R`-modules where `M ↦ M⋆` and
an `R`-linear map `l : M ⟶ N` induces an `R`-linear map `l⋆ : f ↦ f ∘ l` where `f : N⋆`.
- `LinearMap.dual_surjective_of_injective` : If `l` is injective then `l⋆` is surjective,
in another word taking character module as a functor sends monos to epis.
- `CharacterModule.homEquiv` : there is a bijection between linear map `Hom(N, M⋆)` and
`(N ⊗ M)⋆` given by `curry` and `uncurry`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
universe uR uA uB
variable (R : Type uR) [CommRing R]
variable (A : Type uA) [AddCommGroup A]
variable (A' : Type*) [AddCommGroup A']
variable (B : Type uB) [AddCommGroup B]
/--
The character module of an abelian group `A` in the unit rational circle is `A⋆ := Hom_ℤ(A, ℚ ⧸ ℤ)`.
-/
def CharacterModule : Type uA := A →+ AddCircle (1 : ℚ)
namespace CharacterModule
instance : FunLike (CharacterModule A) A (AddCircle (1 : ℚ)) where
coe c := c.toFun
coe_injective' _ _ _ := by aesop
instance : LinearMapClass (CharacterModule A) ℤ A (AddCircle (1 : ℚ)) where
map_add _ _ _ := by rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add]
map_smulₛₗ _ _ _ := by rw [AddMonoidHom.map_zsmul, RingHom.id_apply]
instance : AddCommGroup (CharacterModule A) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (A →+ _))
@[ext] theorem ext {c c' : CharacterModule A} (h : ∀ x, c x = c' x) : c = c' := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
section module
variable [Module R A] [Module R A'] [Module R B]
instance : Module R (CharacterModule A) :=
Module.compHom (A →+ _) (RingEquiv.toOpposite _ |>.toRingHom : R →+* Rᵈᵐᵃ)
variable {R A B}
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (c : CharacterModule A) (r : R) (a : A) : (r • c) a = c (r • a) := rfl
/--
Given an abelian group homomorphism `f : A → B`, `f⋆(L) := L ∘ f` defines a linear map
from `B⋆` to `A⋆`.
-/
@[simps] def dual (f : A →ₗ[R] B) : CharacterModule B →ₗ[R] CharacterModule A where
toFun L := L.comp f.toAddMonoidHom
map_add' := by aesop
map_smul' r c := by ext x; exact congr(c $(f.map_smul r x)).symm
@[simp]
lemma dual_zero : dual (0 : A →ₗ[R] B) = 0 := by
ext f
exact map_zero f
lemma dual_comp {C : Type*} [AddCommGroup C] [Module R C] (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (g : B →ₗ[R] C) :
dual (g.comp f) = (dual f).comp (dual g) := by
ext
rfl
lemma dual_injective_of_surjective (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Injective (dual f) := by
intro φ ψ eq
ext x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
change (dual f) φ _ = (dual f) ψ _
rw [eq]
lemma dual_surjective_of_injective (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Surjective (dual f) :=
(Module.Baer.of_divisible _).extension_property_addMonoidHom _ hf
/--
Two isomorphic modules have isomorphic character modules.
-/
def congr (e : A ≃ₗ[R] B) : CharacterModule A ≃ₗ[R] CharacterModule B :=
.ofLinear (dual e.symm) (dual e)
(by ext c _; exact congr(c $(e.right_inv _)))
(by ext c _; exact congr(c $(e.left_inv _)))
open TensorProduct
/--
Any linear map `L : A → B⋆` induces a character in `(A ⊗ B)⋆` by `a ⊗ b ↦ L a b`.
-/
@[simps] noncomputable def uncurry :
(A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) →ₗ[R] CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) where
toFun c := TensorProduct.liftAddHom c.toAddMonoidHom fun r a b ↦ congr($(c.map_smul r a) b)
map_add' c c' := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by refine x.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
map_smul' r c := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ x.induction_on
(by simp_rw [map_zero]) (fun a b ↦ congr($(c.map_smul r a) b).symm) (by aesop)
/--
Any character `c` in `(A ⊗ B)⋆` induces a linear map `A → B⋆` by `a ↦ b ↦ c (a ⊗ b)`.
-/
@[simps] noncomputable def curry :
CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) where
toFun c :=
{ toFun := (c.comp <| TensorProduct.mk R A B ·)
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ DFunLike.ext _ _ fun b ↦
congr(c <| $(map_add (mk R A B) _ _) b).trans (c.map_add _ _)
map_smul' := fun r a ↦ by ext; exact congr(c $(TensorProduct.tmul_smul _ _ _)).symm }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' r c := by ext; exact congr(c $(TensorProduct.tmul_smul _ _ _)).symm
/--
Linear maps into a character module are exactly characters of the tensor product.
-/
@[simps!] noncomputable def homEquiv :
(A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) ≃ₗ[R] CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) :=
.ofLinear uncurry curry (by ext _ z; refine z.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop) (by aesop)
theorem dual_rTensor_conj_homEquiv (f : A →ₗ[R] A') :
homEquiv.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ dual (f.rTensor B) ∘ₗ homEquiv.toLinearMap = f.lcomp R _ := rfl
end module
/--
`ℤ⋆`, the character module of `ℤ` in the unit rational circle.
-/
protected abbrev int : Type := CharacterModule ℤ
/-- Given `n : ℕ`, the map `m ↦ m / n`. -/
protected abbrev int.divByNat (n : ℕ) : CharacterModule.int :=
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℤ _ (QuotientAddGroup.mk (n : ℚ)⁻¹) |>.toAddMonoidHom
protected lemma int.divByNat_self (n : ℕ) :
int.divByNat n n = 0 := by
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne n 0
· apply map_zero
exact (AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff _).mpr
⟨1, by simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (Nat.cast_ne_zero (R := ℚ).mpr h0)]⟩
variable {A}
/-- The `ℤ`-submodule spanned by a single element `a` is isomorphic to the quotient of `ℤ`
by the ideal generated by the order of `a`. -/
@[simps!] noncomputable def intSpanEquivQuotAddOrderOf (a : A) :
(ℤ ∙ a) ≃ₗ[ℤ] ℤ ⧸ Ideal.span {(addOrderOf a : ℤ)} :=
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ (LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range ℤ A a) ≪≫ₗ
(LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange <| LinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℤ A a).symm ≪≫ₗ
Submodule.quotEquivOfEq _ _ (by
ext1 x
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, addOrderOf_dvd_iff_zsmul_eq_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker,
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply])
lemma intSpanEquivQuotAddOrderOf_apply_self (a : A) :
intSpanEquivQuotAddOrderOf a ⟨a, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self a⟩ =
Submodule.Quotient.mk 1 :=
(LinearEquiv.eq_symm_apply _).mp <| Subtype.ext (one_zsmul _).symm
/--
For an abelian group `A` and an element `a ∈ A`, there is a character `c : ℤ ∙ a → ℚ ⧸ ℤ` given by
`m • a ↦ m / n` where `n` is the smallest positive integer such that `n • a = 0` and when such `n`
does not exist, `c` is defined by `m • a ↦ m / 2`.
-/
noncomputable def ofSpanSingleton (a : A) : CharacterModule (ℤ ∙ a) :=
let l : ℤ ⧸ Ideal.span {(addOrderOf a : ℤ)} →ₗ[ℤ] AddCircle (1 : ℚ) :=
Submodule.liftQSpanSingleton _
(CharacterModule.int.divByNat <|
if addOrderOf a = 0 then 2 else addOrderOf a).toIntLinearMap <| by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, Nat.cast_zero, map_zero]
· apply CharacterModule.int.divByNat_self
l ∘ₗ intSpanEquivQuotAddOrderOf a |>.toAddMonoidHom
lemma eq_zero_of_ofSpanSingleton_apply_self (a : A)
(h : ofSpanSingleton a ⟨a, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self a⟩ = 0) : a = 0 := by
erw [ofSpanSingleton, LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe, LinearMap.comp_apply,
intSpanEquivQuotAddOrderOf_apply_self, Submodule.liftQSpanSingleton_apply,
AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap, int.divByNat, LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one,
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨n, hn⟩
apply_fun Rat.den at hn
rw [zsmul_one, Rat.den_intCast, Rat.inv_natCast_den_of_pos] at hn
| · split_ifs at hn
· cases hn
· rwa [eq_comm, AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff] at hn
· split_ifs with h
· norm_num
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/CharacterModule.lean | 205 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Martin Zinkevich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Martin Zinkevich, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
/-!
# Induction principles for measurable sets, related to π-systems and λ-systems.
## Main statements
* The main theorem of this file is Dynkin's π-λ theorem, which appears
here as an induction principle `induction_on_inter`. Suppose `s` is a
collection of subsets of `α` such that the intersection of two members
of `s` belongs to `s` whenever it is nonempty. Let `m` be the σ-algebra
generated by `s`. In order to check that a predicate `C` holds on every
member of `m`, it suffices to check that `C` holds on the members of `s` and
that `C` is preserved by complementation and *disjoint* countable
unions.
* The proof of this theorem relies on the notion of `IsPiSystem`, i.e., a collection of sets
which is closed under binary non-empty intersections. Note that this is a small variation around
the usual notion in the literature, which often requires that a π-system is non-empty, and closed
also under disjoint intersections. This variation turns out to be convenient for the
formalization.
* The proof of Dynkin's π-λ theorem also requires the notion of `DynkinSystem`, i.e., a collection
of sets which contains the empty set, is closed under complementation and under countable union
of pairwise disjoint sets. The disjointness condition is the only difference with `σ`-algebras.
* `generatePiSystem g` gives the minimal π-system containing `g`.
This can be considered a Galois insertion into both measurable spaces and sets.
* `generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq` proves that if you start from a collection of sets `g`,
take the generated π-system, and then the generated σ-algebra, you get the same result as
the σ-algebra generated from `g`. This is useful because there are connections between
independent sets that are π-systems and the generated independent spaces.
* `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim` and `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'` show that any
element of the π-system generated from the union of a set of π-systems can be
represented as the intersection of a finite number of elements from these sets.
* `piiUnionInter` defines a new π-system from a family of π-systems `π : ι → Set (Set α)` and a
set of indices `S : Set ι`. `piiUnionInter π S` is the set of sets that can be written
as `⋂ x ∈ t, f x` for some finset `t ∈ S` and sets `f x ∈ π x`.
## Implementation details
* `IsPiSystem` is a predicate, not a type. Thus, we don't explicitly define the galois
insertion, nor do we define a complete lattice. In theory, we could define a complete
lattice and galois insertion on the subtype corresponding to `IsPiSystem`.
-/
open MeasurableSpace Set
open MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A π-system is a collection of subsets of `α` that is closed under binary intersection of
non-disjoint sets. Usually it is also required that the collection is nonempty, but we don't do
that here. -/
def IsPiSystem (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∀ᵉ (s ∈ C) (t ∈ C), (s ∩ t : Set α).Nonempty → s ∩ t ∈ C
namespace MeasurableSpace
theorem isPiSystem_measurableSet {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } := fun _ hs _ ht _ => hs.inter ht
end MeasurableSpace
theorem IsPiSystem.singleton (S : Set α) : IsPiSystem ({S} : Set (Set α)) := by
intro s h_s t h_t _
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_s, Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_t, Set.inter_self,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_empty {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert ∅ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· simp [hs]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert Set.univ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· rcases ht with ht | ht <;> simp [hs, ht]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [hs, ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.comap {α β} {S : Set (Set β)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) (f : α → β) :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | ∃ t ∈ S, f ⁻¹' t = s } := by
rintro _ ⟨s, hs_mem, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, ht_mem, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← Set.preimage_inter] at hst ⊢
exact ⟨s ∩ t, h_pi s hs_mem t ht_mem (nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hst), rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le {α ι} (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) p) :
IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) := by
intro t1 ht1 t2 ht2 h
rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ht1 ht2 ⊢
obtain ⟨n, ht1⟩ := ht1
obtain ⟨m, ht2⟩ := ht2
obtain ⟨k, hpnk, hpmk⟩ : ∃ k, p n ≤ p k ∧ p m ≤ p k := hp_directed n m
exact ⟨k, hp_pi k t1 (hpnk ht1) t2 (hpmk ht2) h⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone {α ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_mono : Monotone p) : IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) :=
isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le p hp_pi (Monotone.directed_le hp_mono)
/-- Rectangles formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
lemma IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C) (hD : IsPiSystem D) :
IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
section Order
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} [LinearOrder α]
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iio (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iio '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iio_inter_Iio.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iio : IsPiSystem (range Iio : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iio ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iio univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ioi (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ioi '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iio αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ioi : IsPiSystem (range Ioi : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ioi ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ioi univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iic (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iic '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iic_inter_Iic.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iic : IsPiSystem (range Iic : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iic ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iic univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ici (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ici '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iic αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ici : IsPiSystem (range Ici : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ici ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ici univ
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx_mem {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), p l u ∧ Ixx l u = S } := by
rintro _ ⟨l₁, hls₁, u₁, hut₁, _, rfl⟩ _ ⟨l₂, hls₂, u₂, hut₂, _, rfl⟩
simp only [Hi]
exact fun H => ⟨l₁ ⊔ l₂, sup_ind l₁ l₂ hls₁ hls₂, u₁ ⊓ u₂, inf_ind u₁ u₂ hut₁ hut₂, Hne H, rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (f : ι → α)
(g : ι' → α) : @IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, p (f i) (g j) ∧ Ixx (f i) (g j) = S } := by
simpa only [exists_range_iff] using isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (@Hne) (@Hi) (range f) (range g)
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioo l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ l u, f l < g u ∧ Ioo (f l) (g u) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ioc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ico_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ico (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ico (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico f g
theorem isPiSystem_Icc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l ≤ u ∧ Icc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) s t
theorem isPiSystem_Icc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i ≤ g j ∧ Icc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) f g
end Order
/-- Given a collection `S` of subsets of `α`, then `generatePiSystem S` is the smallest
π-system containing `S`. -/
inductive generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : Set (Set α)
| base {s : Set α} (h_s : s ∈ S) : generatePiSystem S s
| inter {s t : Set α} (h_s : generatePiSystem S s) (h_t : generatePiSystem S t)
(h_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : generatePiSystem S (s ∩ t)
theorem isPiSystem_generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : IsPiSystem (generatePiSystem S) :=
fun _ h_s _ h_t h_nonempty => generatePiSystem.inter h_s h_t h_nonempty
theorem subset_generatePiSystem_self (S : Set (Set α)) : S ⊆ generatePiSystem S := fun _ =>
generatePiSystem.base
theorem generatePiSystem_subset_self {S : Set (Set α)} (h_S : IsPiSystem S) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ S := fun x h => by
induction h with
| base h_s => exact h_s
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact h_S _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_eq {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) : generatePiSystem S = S :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (generatePiSystem_subset_self h_pi) (subset_generatePiSystem_self S)
theorem generatePiSystem_mono {S T : Set (Set α)} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ generatePiSystem T := fun t ht => by
induction ht with
| base h_s => exact generatePiSystem.base (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hST h_s)
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact isPiSystem_generatePiSystem T _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_measurableSet [M : MeasurableSpace α] {S : Set (Set α)}
(h_meas_S : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) (h_in_pi : t ∈ generatePiSystem S) :
MeasurableSet t := by
induction h_in_pi with
| base h_s => apply h_meas_S _ h_s
| inter _ _ _ h_s h_u => apply MeasurableSet.inter h_s h_u
theorem generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem {g : Set (Set α)} (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ generatePiSystem g) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom g] t :=
@generatePiSystem_measurableSet α (generateFrom g) g
(fun _ h_s_in_g => measurableSet_generateFrom h_s_in_g) t ht
theorem generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq {g : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (generatePiSystem g) = generateFrom g := by
apply le_antisymm <;> apply generateFrom_le
· exact fun t h_t => generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem t h_t
· exact fun t h_t => measurableSet_generateFrom (generatePiSystem.base h_t)
/-- Every element of the π-system generated by the union of a family of π-systems
is a finite intersection of elements from the π-systems.
For an indexed union version, see `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'`. -/
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} (h_pi : ∀ b, IsPiSystem (g b))
(t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
classical
induction h_t with
| @base s h_s =>
rcases h_s with ⟨t', ⟨⟨b, rfl⟩, h_s_in_t'⟩⟩
refine ⟨{b}, fun _ => s, ?_⟩
simpa using h_s_in_t'
| inter h_gen_s h_gen_t' h_nonempty h_s h_t' =>
rcases h_t' with ⟨T_t', ⟨f_t', ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
rcases h_s with ⟨T_s, ⟨f_s, ⟨rfl, h_s⟩⟩⟩
use T_s ∪ T_t', fun b : β =>
if b ∈ T_s then if b ∈ T_t' then f_s b ∩ f_t' b else f_s b
else if b ∈ T_t' then f_t' b else (∅ : Set α)
constructor
· ext a
simp_rw [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union, or_imp]
rw [← forall_and]
constructor <;> intro h1 b <;> by_cases hbs : b ∈ T_s <;> by_cases hbt : b ∈ T_t' <;>
specialize h1 b <;>
simp only [hbs, hbt, if_true, if_false, true_imp_iff, and_self_iff, false_imp_iff] at h1 ⊢
all_goals exact h1
intro b h_b
split_ifs with hbs hbt hbt
· refine h_pi b (f_s b) (h_s b hbs) (f_t' b) (h_t' b hbt) (Set.Nonempty.mono ?_ h_nonempty)
exact Set.inter_subset_inter (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbs) (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbt)
· exact h_s b hbs
· exact h_t' b hbt
· rw [Finset.mem_union] at h_b
apply False.elim (h_b.elim hbs hbt)
/-- Every element of the π-system generated by an indexed union of a family of π-systems
is a finite intersection of elements from the π-systems.
For a total union version, see `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim`. -/
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim' {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} {s : Set β}
(h_pi : ∀ b ∈ s, IsPiSystem (g b)) (t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b ∈ s, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), ↑T ⊆ s ∧ (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
classical
have : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b) := by
suffices h1 : ⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b = ⋃ b ∈ s, g b by rwa [h1]
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
rfl
rcases @mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim α (Subtype s) (g ∘ Subtype.val)
(fun b => h_pi b.val b.property) t this with
⟨T, ⟨f, ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
refine
⟨T.image (fun x : s => (x : β)),
Function.extend (fun x : s => (x : β)) f fun _ : β => (∅ : Set α), by simp, ?_, ?_⟩
· ext a
constructor <;>
· simp -proj only
[Set.mem_iInter, Subtype.forall, Finset.set_biInter_finset_image]
intro h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
have h2 := h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
revert h2
rw [Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply id
· intros b h_b
simp_rw [Finset.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
at h_b
obtain ⟨h_b_w, h_b_h⟩ := h_b
have h_b_alt : b = (Subtype.mk b h_b_w).val := rfl
rw [h_b_alt, Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply h_t'
apply h_b_h
section UnionInter
variable {α ι : Type*}
/-! ### π-system generated by finite intersections of sets of a π-system family -/
/-- From a set of indices `S : Set ι` and a family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set α)`,
define the set of sets that can be written as `⋂ x ∈ t, f x` for some finset `t ⊆ S` and sets
`f x ∈ π x`. If `π` is a family of π-systems, then it is a π-system. -/
def piiUnionInter (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (S : Set ι) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s : Set α |
∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S) (f : ι → Set α) (_ : ∀ x, x ∈ t → f x ∈ π x), s = ⋂ x ∈ t, f x }
theorem piiUnionInter_singleton (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (i : ι) :
piiUnionInter π {i} = π i ∪ {univ} := by
ext1 s
simp only [piiUnionInter, exists_prop, mem_union]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨t, hti, f, hfπ, rfl⟩
simp only [subset_singleton_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hti
by_cases hi : i ∈ t
· have ht_eq_i : t = {i} := by
ext1 x
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => hti x h, fun h => h.symm ▸ hi⟩
simp only [ht_eq_i, Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
exact Or.inl (hfπ i hi)
· have ht_empty : t = ∅ := by
ext1 x
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false]
exact fun hx => hi (hti x hx ▸ hx)
simp [ht_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, Set.mem_singleton univ]
· rcases h with hs | hs
· refine ⟨{i}, ?_, fun _ => s, ⟨fun x hx => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
· rw [Finset.mem_singleton] at hx
rwa [hx]
· simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
· refine ⟨∅, ?_⟩
simpa only [Finset.coe_empty, subset_singleton_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff,
imp_true_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, true_and,
exists_const] using hs
theorem piiUnionInter_singleton_left (s : ι → Set α) (S : Set ι) :
piiUnionInter (fun i => ({s i} : Set (Set α))) S =
{ s' : Set α | ∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S), s' = ⋂ i ∈ t, s i } := by
ext1 s'
simp_rw [piiUnionInter, Set.mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, htS, h_eq⟩ => ⟨t, htS, s, fun _ _ => rfl, h_eq⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, htS, f, hft_eq, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨t, htS, ?_⟩
congr! 3
apply hft_eq
assumption
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_singleton_left (s : ι → Set α) (S : Set ι) :
generateFrom (piiUnionInter (fun k => {s k}) S) = generateFrom { t | ∃ k ∈ S, s k = t } := by
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_mono ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨I, hI, f, hf, rfl⟩
refine Finset.measurableSet_biInter _ fun m hm => measurableSet_generateFrom ?_
exact ⟨m, hI hm, (hf m hm).symm⟩
· rintro _ ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
refine ⟨{k}, fun m hm => ?_, s, fun i _ => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_singleton] at hm
rwa [hm]
· exact Set.mem_singleton _
· simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left]
/-- If `π` is a family of π-systems, then `piiUnionInter π S` is a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_piiUnionInter (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (hpi : ∀ x, IsPiSystem (π x)) (S : Set ι) :
IsPiSystem (piiUnionInter π S) := by
classical
rintro t1 ⟨p1, hp1S, f1, hf1m, ht1_eq⟩ t2 ⟨p2, hp2S, f2, hf2m, ht2_eq⟩ h_nonempty
simp_rw [piiUnionInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
let g n := ite (n ∈ p1) (f1 n) Set.univ ∩ ite (n ∈ p2) (f2 n) Set.univ
have hp_union_ss : ↑(p1 ∪ p2) ⊆ S := by
simp only [hp1S, hp2S, Finset.coe_union, union_subset_iff, and_self_iff]
use p1 ∪ p2, hp_union_ss, g
have h_inter_eq : t1 ∩ t2 = ⋂ i ∈ p1 ∪ p2, g i := by
rw [ht1_eq, ht2_eq]
simp_rw [← Set.inf_eq_inter]
ext1 x
simp only [g, inf_eq_inter, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union]
refine ⟨fun h i _ => ?_, fun h => ⟨fun i hi1 => ?_, fun i hi2 => ?_⟩⟩
· split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [⟨h.1 i h_1, h.2 i h_2⟩, ⟨h.1 i h_1, Set.mem_univ _⟩, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, h.2 i h_2⟩,
⟨Set.mem_univ _, Set.mem_univ _⟩]
· specialize h i (Or.inl hi1)
rw [if_pos hi1] at h
exact h.1
· specialize h i (Or.inr hi2)
rw [if_pos hi2] at h
exact h.2
refine ⟨fun n hn => ?_, h_inter_eq⟩
simp only [g]
split_ifs with hn1 hn2 h
· refine hpi n (f1 n) (hf1m n hn1) (f2 n) (hf2m n hn2) (Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h => ?_)
rw [h_inter_eq] at h_nonempty
suffices h_empty : ⋂ i ∈ p1 ∪ p2, g i = ∅ from
(Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mpr h_empty) h_nonempty
refine le_antisymm (Set.iInter_subset_of_subset n ?_) (Set.empty_subset _)
refine Set.iInter_subset_of_subset hn ?_
simp_rw [g, if_pos hn1, if_pos hn2]
exact h.subset
· simp [hf1m n hn1]
· simp [hf2m n h]
· exact absurd hn (by simp [hn1, h])
theorem piiUnionInter_mono_left {π π' : ι → Set (Set α)} (h_le : ∀ i, π i ⊆ π' i) (S : Set ι) :
piiUnionInter π S ⊆ piiUnionInter π' S := fun _ ⟨t, ht_mem, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩ =>
⟨t, ht_mem, ft, fun x hxt => h_le x (hft_mem_pi x hxt), h_eq⟩
theorem piiUnionInter_mono_right {π : ι → Set (Set α)} {S T : Set ι} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
piiUnionInter π S ⊆ piiUnionInter π T := fun _ ⟨t, ht_mem, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩ =>
⟨t, ht_mem.trans hST, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_le {m : MeasurableSpace α} (π : ι → Set (Set α))
(h : ∀ n, generateFrom (π n) ≤ m) (S : Set ι) : generateFrom (piiUnionInter π S) ≤ m := by
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro t ⟨ht_p, _, ft, hft_mem_pi, rfl⟩
refine Finset.measurableSet_biInter _ fun x hx_mem => (h x) _ ?_
exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hft_mem_pi x hx_mem)
theorem subset_piiUnionInter {π : ι → Set (Set α)} {S : Set ι} {i : ι} (his : i ∈ S) :
π i ⊆ piiUnionInter π S := by
have h_ss : {i} ⊆ S := by
intro j hj
rw [mem_singleton_iff] at hj
rwa [hj]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (piiUnionInter_mono_right h_ss)
rw [piiUnionInter_singleton]
exact subset_union_left
theorem mem_piiUnionInter_of_measurableSet (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) {S : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hiS : i ∈ S) (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet[m i] s) :
s ∈ piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S :=
subset_piiUnionInter hiS hs
theorem le_generateFrom_piiUnionInter {π : ι → Set (Set α)} (S : Set ι) {x : ι} (hxS : x ∈ S) :
generateFrom (π x) ≤ generateFrom (piiUnionInter π S) :=
generateFrom_mono (subset_piiUnionInter hxS)
theorem measurableSet_iSup_of_mem_piiUnionInter (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) (S : Set ι) (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S) :
MeasurableSet[⨆ i ∈ S, m i] t := by
rcases ht with ⟨pt, hpt, ft, ht_m, rfl⟩
refine pt.measurableSet_biInter fun i hi => ?_
suffices h_le : m i ≤ ⨆ i ∈ S, m i from h_le (ft i) (ht_m i hi)
have hi' : i ∈ S := hpt hi
exact le_iSup₂ (f := fun i (_ : i ∈ S) => m i) i hi'
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_measurableSet (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) (S : Set ι) :
generateFrom (piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S) = ⨆ i ∈ S, m i := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← @generateFrom_measurableSet α (⨆ i ∈ S, m i)]
exact generateFrom_mono (measurableSet_iSup_of_mem_piiUnionInter m S)
· refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => ?_
rw [← @generateFrom_measurableSet α (m i)]
exact generateFrom_mono (mem_piiUnionInter_of_measurableSet m hi)
end UnionInter
namespace MeasurableSpace
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ## Dynkin systems and Π-λ theorem -/
/-- A Dynkin system is a collection of subsets of a type `α` that contains the empty set,
is closed under complementation and under countable union of pairwise disjoint sets.
The disjointness condition is the only difference with `σ`-algebras.
The main purpose of Dynkin systems is to provide a powerful induction rule for σ-algebras
generated by a collection of sets which is stable under intersection.
A Dynkin system is also known as a "λ-system" or a "d-system".
-/
structure DynkinSystem (α : Type*) where
/-- Predicate saying that a given set is contained in the Dynkin system. -/
Has : Set α → Prop
/-- A Dynkin system contains the empty set. -/
has_empty : Has ∅
/-- A Dynkin system is closed under complementation. -/
has_compl : ∀ {a}, Has a → Has aᶜ
/-- A Dynkin system is closed under countable union of pairwise disjoint sets. Use a more general
`MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_iUnion` instead. -/
has_iUnion_nat : ∀ {f : ℕ → Set α}, Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → (∀ i, Has (f i)) → Has (⋃ i, f i)
namespace DynkinSystem
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {d₁ d₂ : DynkinSystem α}, (∀ s : Set α, d₁.Has s ↔ d₂.Has s) → d₁ = d₂
| ⟨s₁, _, _, _⟩, ⟨s₂, _, _, _⟩, h => by
have : s₁ = s₂ := funext fun x => propext <| h x
subst this
rfl
variable (d : DynkinSystem α)
theorem has_compl_iff {a} : d.Has aᶜ ↔ d.Has a :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using d.has_compl h, fun h => d.has_compl h⟩
theorem has_univ : d.Has univ := by simpa using d.has_compl d.has_empty
theorem has_iUnion {β} [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(h : ∀ i, d.Has (f i)) : d.Has (⋃ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
rw [← Encodable.iUnion_decode₂]
exact
d.has_iUnion_nat (Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hd) fun n =>
Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_cases d.has_empty h
theorem has_union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : d.Has s₁) (h₂ : d.Has s₂) (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
d.Has (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]
exact d.has_iUnion (pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
theorem has_diff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : d.Has s₁) (h₂ : d.Has s₂) (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
d.Has (s₁ \ s₂) := by
apply d.has_compl_iff.1
simp only [diff_eq, compl_inter, compl_compl]
exact d.has_union (d.has_compl h₁) h₂ (disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h)
instance instLEDynkinSystem : LE (DynkinSystem α) where le m₁ m₂ := m₁.Has ≤ m₂.Has
theorem le_def {a b : DynkinSystem α} : a ≤ b ↔ a.Has ≤ b.Has :=
Iff.rfl
instance : PartialOrder (DynkinSystem α) :=
{ DynkinSystem.instLEDynkinSystem with
le_refl := fun _ _ => le_rfl
le_trans := fun _ _ _ hab hbc => le_def.mpr (le_trans hab hbc)
le_antisymm := fun _ _ h₁ h₂ => ext fun s => ⟨h₁ s, h₂ s⟩ }
/-- Every measurable space (σ-algebra) forms a Dynkin system -/
def ofMeasurableSpace (m : MeasurableSpace α) : DynkinSystem α where
Has := m.MeasurableSet'
has_empty := m.measurableSet_empty
has_compl {a} := m.measurableSet_compl a
has_iUnion_nat {f} _ hf := m.measurableSet_iUnion f hf
theorem ofMeasurableSpace_le_ofMeasurableSpace_iff {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α} :
ofMeasurableSpace m₁ ≤ ofMeasurableSpace m₂ ↔ m₁ ≤ m₂ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The least Dynkin system containing a collection of basic sets.
This inductive type gives the underlying collection of sets. -/
inductive GenerateHas (s : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ t ∈ s, GenerateHas s t
| empty : GenerateHas s ∅
| compl : ∀ {a}, GenerateHas s a → GenerateHas s aᶜ
| iUnion : ∀ {f : ℕ → Set α},
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → (∀ i, GenerateHas s (f i)) → GenerateHas s (⋃ i, f i)
theorem generateHas_compl {C : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} : GenerateHas C sᶜ ↔ GenerateHas C s := by
refine ⟨?_, GenerateHas.compl⟩
intro h
convert GenerateHas.compl h
simp
/-- The least Dynkin system containing a collection of basic sets. -/
def generate (s : Set (Set α)) : DynkinSystem α where
Has := GenerateHas s
has_empty := GenerateHas.empty
has_compl {_} := GenerateHas.compl
has_iUnion_nat {_} := GenerateHas.iUnion
theorem generateHas_def {C : Set (Set α)} : (generate C).Has = GenerateHas C :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (DynkinSystem α) :=
⟨generate univ⟩
/-- If a Dynkin system is closed under binary intersection, then it forms a `σ`-algebra. -/
def toMeasurableSpace (h_inter : ∀ s₁ s₂, d.Has s₁ → d.Has s₂ → d.Has (s₁ ∩ s₂)) :
MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' := d.Has
measurableSet_empty := d.has_empty
measurableSet_compl _ h := d.has_compl h
measurableSet_iUnion f hf := by
rw [← iUnion_disjointed]
exact
d.has_iUnion (disjoint_disjointed _) fun n =>
disjointedRec (fun (t : Set α) i h => h_inter _ _ h <| d.has_compl <| hf i) (hf n)
theorem ofMeasurableSpace_toMeasurableSpace
(h_inter : ∀ s₁ s₂, d.Has s₁ → d.Has s₂ → d.Has (s₁ ∩ s₂)) :
ofMeasurableSpace (d.toMeasurableSpace h_inter) = d :=
ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
/-- If `s` is in a Dynkin system `d`, we can form the new Dynkin system `{s ∩ t | t ∈ d}`. -/
def restrictOn {s : Set α} (h : d.Has s) : DynkinSystem α where
Has t := d.Has (t ∩ s)
has_empty := by simp [d.has_empty]
has_compl {t} hts := by
have : tᶜ ∩ s = (t ∩ s)ᶜ \ sᶜ := Set.ext fun x => by by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h]
simp_rw [this]
exact
d.has_diff (d.has_compl hts) (d.has_compl h)
(compl_subset_compl.mpr inter_subset_right)
has_iUnion_nat {f} hd hf := by
rw [iUnion_inter]
refine d.has_iUnion_nat ?_ hf
exact hd.mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inter_subset_left inter_subset_left
theorem generate_le {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ∀ t ∈ s, d.Has t) : generate s ≤ d := fun _ ht =>
ht.recOn h d.has_empty (fun {_} _ h => d.has_compl h) fun {_} hd _ hf => d.has_iUnion hd hf
theorem generate_has_subset_generate_measurable {C : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
(hs : (generate C).Has s) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom C] s :=
generate_le (ofMeasurableSpace (generateFrom C)) (fun _ => measurableSet_generateFrom) s hs
theorem generate_inter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsPiSystem s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α}
(ht₁ : (generate s).Has t₁) (ht₂ : (generate s).Has t₂) : (generate s).Has (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
have : generate s ≤ (generate s).restrictOn ht₂ :=
generate_le _ fun s₁ hs₁ =>
have : (generate s).Has s₁ := GenerateHas.basic s₁ hs₁
have : generate s ≤ (generate s).restrictOn this :=
generate_le _ fun s₂ hs₂ =>
show (generate s).Has (s₂ ∩ s₁) from
(s₂ ∩ s₁).eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ GenerateHas.empty) fun h =>
GenerateHas.basic _ <| hs _ hs₂ _ hs₁ h
have : (generate s).Has (t₂ ∩ s₁) := this _ ht₂
show (generate s).Has (s₁ ∩ t₂) by rwa [inter_comm]
this _ ht₁
/-- **Dynkin's π-λ theorem**:
Given a collection of sets closed under binary intersections, then the Dynkin system it
generates is equal to the σ-algebra it generates.
This result is known as the π-λ theorem.
A collection of sets closed under binary intersection is called a π-system (often requiring
additionally that it is non-empty, but we drop this condition in the formalization).
-/
theorem generateFrom_eq {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsPiSystem s) :
generateFrom s = (generate s).toMeasurableSpace fun _ _ => generate_inter hs :=
le_antisymm (generateFrom_le fun t ht => GenerateHas.basic t ht)
(ofMeasurableSpace_le_ofMeasurableSpace_iff.mp <| by
rw [ofMeasurableSpace_toMeasurableSpace]
exact generate_le _ fun t ht => measurableSet_generateFrom ht)
end DynkinSystem
/-- Induction principle for measurable sets.
If `s` is a π-system that generates the product `σ`-algebra on `α`
and a predicate `C` defined on measurable sets is true
- on the empty set;
- on each set `t ∈ s`;
- on the complement of a measurable set that satisfies `C`;
- on the union of a sequence of pairwise disjoint measurable sets that satisfy `C`,
then it is true on all measurable sets in `α`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_inter {m : MeasurableSpace α} {C : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → Prop}
{s : Set (Set α)} (h_eq : m = generateFrom s) (h_inter : IsPiSystem s)
(empty : C ∅ .empty) (basic : ∀ t (ht : t ∈ s), C t <| h_eq ▸ .basic t ht)
(compl : ∀ t (htm : MeasurableSet t), C t htm → C tᶜ htm.compl)
(iUnion : ∀ (f : ℕ → Set α), Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → ∀ (hfm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
(∀ i, C (f i) (hfm i)) → C (⋃ i, f i) (.iUnion hfm)) :
∀ t (ht : MeasurableSet t), C t ht := by
have eq : MeasurableSet = DynkinSystem.GenerateHas s := by
rw [h_eq, DynkinSystem.generateFrom_eq h_inter]
rfl
suffices ∀ t (ht : DynkinSystem.GenerateHas s t), C t (eq ▸ ht) from
fun t ht ↦ this t (eq ▸ ht)
intro t ht
induction ht with
| basic u hu => exact basic u hu
| empty => exact empty
| @compl u hu ihu => exact compl _ (eq ▸ hu) ihu
| @iUnion f hfd hf ihf => exact iUnion f hfd (eq ▸ hf) ihf
|
end MeasurableSpace
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/PiSystem.lean | 697 | 709 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
/-!
# Congruences modulo an integer
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` on the integers, similarly to how
`Data.Nat.ModEq` defines them for the natural numbers. The notation is short for `n.ModEq a b`,
which is defined to be `a % n = b % n` for integers `a b n`.
## Tags
modeq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo, integers
-/
namespace Int
/-- `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` when `a % n = b % n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℤ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [ZMOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℤ}
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := decEq (a % n) (b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl, simp]
protected theorem refl (a : ℤ) : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
@rfl _ _
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ c [ZMOD n] → a ≡ c [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : IsTrans ℤ (ModEq n) where
trans := @Int.ModEq.trans n
protected theorem eq : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → a % n = b % n := id
end ModEq
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [ZMOD n] := ⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
theorem natCast_modEq_iff {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
unfold ModEq Nat.ModEq; rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]; simp [natCast_mod]
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by
rw [ModEq, zero_emod, dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_int (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_int (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_int.symm
theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm]
simp [emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero, dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
theorem modEq_iff_add_fac {a b n : ℤ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ ∃ t, b = a + n * t := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd]
exact exists_congr fun t => sub_eq_iff_eq_add'
alias ⟨ModEq.dvd, modEq_of_dvd⟩ := modEq_iff_dvd
theorem mod_modEq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
emod_emod _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, (by omega : -b - -a = -(b - a)), Int.dvd_neg]
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [ZMOD -n] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by simp [modEq_iff_dvd]
namespace ModEq
protected theorem of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD m] :=
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| d.trans h.dvd
protected theorem mul_left' (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD c * n] := by
obtain hc | rfl | hc := lt_trichotomy c 0
· rw [← neg_modEq_neg, ← modEq_neg, ← Int.neg_mul, ← Int.neg_mul, ← Int.neg_mul]
simp only [ModEq, mul_emod_mul_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos.2 hc), h.eq]
· simp only [Int.zero_mul, ModEq.rfl]
· simp only [ModEq, mul_emod_mul_of_pos _ _ hc, h.eq]
protected theorem mul_right' (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD n * c] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left'
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by convert Int.dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd using 1; omega
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_left (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add h
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_right (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [ZMOD n] :=
h.add ModEq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
c ≡ d [ZMOD n] :=
have : d - c = b + d - (a + c) - (b - a) := by omega
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by
rw [this]
exact Int.dvd_sub h₂.dvd h₁.dvd
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℤ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂
exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℤ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
@[gcongr] protected theorem neg (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : -a ≡ -b [ZMOD n] :=
h.add_left_cancel (by simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self]; rfl)
@[gcongr]
protected theorem sub (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a - c ≡ b - d [ZMOD n] := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact h₁.add h₂.neg
@[gcongr] protected theorem sub_left (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c - a ≡ c - b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.sub h
@[gcongr] protected theorem sub_right (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a - c ≡ b - c [ZMOD n] :=
h.sub ModEq.rfl
@[gcongr] protected theorem mul_left (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD n] :=
h.mul_left'.of_dvd <| dvd_mul_left _ _
@[gcongr] protected theorem mul_right (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD n] :=
h.mul_right'.of_dvd <| dvd_mul_right _ _
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [ZMOD n] :=
(h₂.mul_left _).trans (h₁.mul_right _)
@[gcongr] protected theorem pow (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a ^ m ≡ b ^ m [ZMOD n] := by
induction' m with d hd; · rfl
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact hd.mul h
lemma of_mul_left (m : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd] at *; exact (dvd_mul_left n m).trans h
lemma of_mul_right (m : ℤ) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n * m] → a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
mul_comm m n ▸ of_mul_left _
/-- To cancel a common factor `c` from a `ModEq` we must divide the modulus `m` by `gcd m c`. -/
theorem cancel_right_div_gcd (hm : 0 < m) (h : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD m]) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD m / gcd m c] := by
letI d := gcd m c
rw [modEq_iff_dvd] at h ⊢
refine Int.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one (?_ : m / d ∣ c / d * (b - a)) ?_
· rw [mul_comm, ← Int.mul_ediv_assoc (b - a) gcd_dvd_right, Int.sub_mul]
exact Int.ediv_dvd_ediv gcd_dvd_left h
· rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_natCast,
Nat.div_self (gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left c hm.ne')]
/-- To cancel a common factor `c` from a `ModEq` we must divide the modulus `m` by `gcd m c`. -/
theorem cancel_left_div_gcd (hm : 0 < m) (h : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD m]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD m / gcd m c] :=
cancel_right_div_gcd hm <| by simpa [mul_comm] using h
theorem of_div (h : a / c ≡ b / c [ZMOD m / c]) (ha : c ∣ a) (ha : c ∣ b) (ha : c ∣ m) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD m] := by convert h.mul_left' <;> rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
end ModEq
theorem modEq_one : a ≡ b [ZMOD 1] :=
modEq_of_dvd (one_dvd _)
theorem modEq_sub (a b : ℤ) : a ≡ b [ZMOD a - b] :=
(modEq_of_dvd dvd_rfl).symm
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero_iff : a ≡ b [ZMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by rw [ModEq, emod_zero, emod_zero]
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_left : n + a ≡ a [ZMOD n] := ModEq.symm <| modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_right : a + n ≡ a [ZMOD n] := ModEq.symm <| modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp
theorem modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul {a b m n : ℤ} (hmn : m.natAbs.Coprime n.natAbs) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD m] ∧ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD m * n] :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, modEq_iff_dvd] at h
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, ← natAbs_dvd, ← dvd_natAbs, natCast_dvd_natCast, natAbs_mul]
refine hmn.mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd ?_ ?_ <;>
rw [← natCast_dvd_natCast, natAbs_dvd, dvd_natAbs] <;>
tauto,
fun h => ⟨h.of_mul_right _, h.of_mul_left _⟩⟩
theorem gcd_a_modEq (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℤ) * Nat.gcdA a b ≡ Nat.gcd a b [ZMOD b] := by
rw [← add_zero ((a : ℤ) * _), Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab]
exact (dvd_mul_right _ _).zero_modEq_int.add_left _
theorem modEq_add_fac {a b n : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (ha : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a + n * c ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
calc
a + n * c ≡ b + n * c [ZMOD n] := ha.add_right _
_ ≡ b + 0 [ZMOD n] := (dvd_mul_right _ _).modEq_zero_int.add_left _
_ ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by rw [add_zero]
theorem modEq_sub_fac {a b n : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (ha : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a - n * c ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
convert Int.modEq_add_fac (-c) ha using 1; rw [Int.mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem modEq_add_fac_self {a t n : ℤ} : a + n * t ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_add_fac _ ModEq.rfl
theorem mod_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Nat.Coprime a b) : ∃ y : ℤ, a * y ≡ 1 [ZMOD b] :=
⟨Nat.gcdA a b,
have hgcd : Nat.gcd a b = 1 := Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one hab
calc
↑a * Nat.gcdA a b ≡ ↑a * Nat.gcdA a b + ↑b * Nat.gcdB a b [ZMOD ↑b] :=
ModEq.symm <| modEq_add_fac _ <| ModEq.refl _
_ ≡ 1 [ZMOD ↑b] := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, hgcd]; rfl
⟩
theorem existsUnique_equiv (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) :
∃ z : ℤ, 0 ≤ z ∧ z < b ∧ z ≡ a [ZMOD b] :=
⟨a % b, emod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hb),
by
have : a % b < |b| := emod_lt_abs _ (ne_of_gt hb)
rwa [abs_of_pos hb] at this, by simp [ModEq]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_equiv := existsUnique_equiv
theorem existsUnique_equiv_nat (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) : ∃ z : ℕ, ↑z < b ∧ ↑z ≡ a [ZMOD b] :=
let ⟨z, hz1, hz2, hz3⟩ := existsUnique_equiv a hb
⟨z.natAbs, by
constructor <;> rw [natAbs_of_nonneg hz1] <;> assumption⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_equiv_nat := existsUnique_equiv_nat
| Mathlib/Data/Int/ModEq.lean | 260 | 260 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
protected theorem ofNat [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) [d.AtLeastTwo] :
PosSemidef (ofNat(d) : Matrix n n R) :=
.natCast d
protected theorem intCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℤ) (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_intCast _, fun x => by
simp only [intCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul]
exact zsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) hd⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_intCast_iff
[StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial R] (d : ℤ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) ↔ 0 ≤ d :=
posSemidef_diagonal_iff.trans <| by simp [Pi.le_def]
protected lemma pow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (k : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (M ^ k) :=
match k with
| 0 => .one
| 1 => by simpa using hM
| (k + 2) => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
simpa only [hM.isHermitian.eq] using (hM.pow k).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same M
protected lemma inv [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M⁻¹.PosSemidef := by
by_cases h : IsUnit M.det
· have := (conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM M⁻¹).conjTranspose
rwa [mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right _ _ h, conjTranspose_conjTranspose] at this
· rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
exact .zero
protected lemma zpow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (z : ℤ) :
(M ^ z).PosSemidef := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· simpa using hM.pow n
· simpa using (hM.pow n).inv
|
protected lemma add [AddLeftMono R] {A : Matrix m m R} {B : Matrix m m R}
(hA : A.PosSemidef) (hB : B.PosSemidef) : (A + B).PosSemidef :=
⟨hA.isHermitian.add hB.isHermitian, fun x => by
rw [add_mulVec, dotProduct_add]
exact add_nonneg (hA.2 x) (hB.2 x)⟩
/-- The eigenvalues of a positive semi-definite matrix are non-negative -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 160 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
theorem isSquare_iff {q : ℚ} : IsSquare q ↔ IsSquare q.num ∧ IsSquare q.den := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨qr, rfl⟩
rw [Rat.mul_self_num, mul_self_den]
simp only [IsSquare.mul_self, and_self]
· rintro ⟨⟨nr, hnr⟩, ⟨dr, hdr⟩⟩
refine ⟨nr / dr, ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_div_comm, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← hnr, ← hdr, num_div_den]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : IsSquare (n : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare n := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, num_natCast, den_natCast, IsSquare.one, and_true, Int.isSquare_natCast_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} : IsSquare (z : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare z := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, intCast_num, intCast_den, IsSquare.one, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem isSquare_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsSquare (ofNat(n) : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
isSquare_natCast_iff
section Casts
theorem exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).den :=
haveI : (n : ℚ) / d = Rat.divInt n d := by rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div]
Rat.num_den_mk d_ne_zero this
theorem mul_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q * r).num * q.den * r.den = q.num * r.num * (q * r).den := by
let s := q.num * r.num /. (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.num) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
rw [Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_mul_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h, mul_comm, ← Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul, ← divInt_eq_div]
| theorem add_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q + r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) * (q + r).den := by
let s := divInt (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
repeat rw [Int.mul_assoc]
apply mul_eq_mul_left_iff.2
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_add_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 154 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels
In a category with zero morphisms, the kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is
the equalizer of `f` and `0 : X ⟶ Y`. (Similarly the cokernel is the coequalizer.)
The basic definitions are
* `kernel : (X ⟶ Y) → C`
* `kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X`
* `kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0` and
* `kernel.lift (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f` (as well as the dual versions)
## Main statements
Besides the definition and lifts, we prove
* `kernel.ιZeroIsIso`: a kernel map of a zero morphism is an isomorphism
* `kernel.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel`: if `kernel.ι f` is an epimorphism, then `f = 0`
* `kernel.ofMono`: the kernel of a monomorphism is the zero object
* `kernel.liftMono`: the lift of a monomorphism `k : W ⟶ X` such that `k ≫ f = 0`
is still a monomorphism
* `kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone`: if our category has a zero object, then the map from the zero
object is a kernel map of any monomorphism
* `kernel.ιOfZero`: `kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)` is an isomorphism
and the corresponding dual statements.
## Future work
* TODO: connect this with existing work in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₂ u u' u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- A morphism `f` has a kernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasKernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)
/-- A morphism `f` has a cokernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
section
/-- A kernel fork is just a fork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev KernelFork :=
Fork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem KernelFork.condition (s : KernelFork f) : Fork.ι s ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [Fork.condition, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem KernelFork.app_one (s : KernelFork f) : s.π.app one = 0 := by
simp [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
/-- A morphism `ι` satisfying `ι ≫ f = 0` determines a kernel fork over `f`. -/
abbrev KernelFork.ofι {Z : C} (ι : Z ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) : KernelFork f :=
Fork.ofι ι <| by rw [w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
@[simp]
theorem KernelFork.ι_ofι {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) :
Fork.ι (KernelFork.ofι ι w) = ι := rfl
section
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy nor case_bash
/-- Every kernel fork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `fork.ofι (fork.ι s) _`. -/
def isoOfι (s : Fork f 0) : s ≅ Fork.ofι (Fork.ι s) (Fork.condition s) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by rintro ⟨j⟩ <;> simp
/-- If `ι = ι'`, then `fork.ofι ι _` and `fork.ofι ι' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofιCongr {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} {w : ι ≫ f = 0} (h : ι = ι') :
KernelFork.ofι ι w ≅ KernelFork.ofι ι' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
/-- If `F` is an equivalence, then applying `F` to a diagram indexing a (co)kernel of `f` yields
the diagram indexing the (co)kernel of `F.map f`. -/
def compNatIso {D : Type u'} [Category.{v} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.IsEquivalence] :
parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F ≅ parallelPair (F.map f) 0 :=
let app (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F).obj j ≅ (parallelPair (F.map f) 0).obj j :=
match j with
| zero => Iso.refl _
| one => Iso.refl _
NatIso.ofComponents app <| by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ <;> intro g <;> cases g <;> simp [app]
end
/-- If `s` is a limit kernel fork and `k : W ⟶ X` satisfies `k ≫ f = 0`, then there is some
`l : W ⟶ s.X` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a kernel fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : KernelFork f) (lift : ∀ s : KernelFork f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : KernelFork f, lift s ≫ t.ι = s.ι)
(uniq : ∀ (s : KernelFork f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· exact fac s
· simp
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.zero) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` constructed using
`KernelFork.ofι` is a limit cone.
-/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (eq : g ≫ f = 0)
(lift : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (_ : g' ≫ f = 0), W' ⟶ W)
(fac : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0), lift g' eq' ≫ g = g')
(uniq :
∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0) (m : W' ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ g = g'), m = lift g' eq') :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι g eq) :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => lift s.ι s.condition) (fun s => fac s.ι s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.ι s.condition
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` of the form
`KernelFork.ofι i _` is a limit cone when we know that `i` is a monomorphism. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι' {X Y K : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (i : K ⟶ X) (w : i ≫ f = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : A ⟶ X) (_ : k ≫ f = 0), { l : A ⟶ K // l ≫ i = k}) [hi : Mono i] :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i w) :=
ofι _ _ (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_mono i, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every kernel of `f` induces a kernel of `f ≫ g` if `g` is mono. -/
def isKernelCompMono {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g] {h : X ⟶ Z}
(hh : h = f ≫ g) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι (by simp [hh]) : KernelFork h) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : KernelFork f := Fork.ofι s.ι (by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp [← hh, s.condition])
let l := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' i s'.ι s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
theorem isKernelCompMono_lift {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g]
{h : X ⟶ Z} (hh : h = f ≫ g) (s : KernelFork h) :
(isKernelCompMono i g hh).lift s = i.lift (Fork.ofι s.ι (by
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) := rfl
/-- Every kernel of `f ≫ g` is also a kernel of `f`, as long as `c.ι ≫ f` vanishes. -/
def isKernelOfComp {W : C} (g : Y ⟶ W) (h : X ⟶ W) {c : KernelFork h} (i : IsLimit c)
(hf : c.ι ≫ f = 0) (hfg : f ≫ g = h) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι hf) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => i.lift (KernelFork.ofι s.ι (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι]) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; simpa using h
/-- `X` identifies to the kernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (𝟙 X) (show 𝟙 X ≫ f = 0 by rw [hf, comp_zero])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.comp_id _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.comp_id])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the kernel of a given monomorphisms. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hf : Mono f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsLimit c :=
isLimitAux _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [zero_comp, ← cancel_mono f, zero_comp, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_tgt _ _)
lemma KernelFork.IsLimit.isIso_ι {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hc : IsLimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.ι := by
let e : c.pt ≅ X := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : e.inv ≫ c.ι = 𝟙 X := Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hc
haveI : IsIso (e.inv ≫ c.ι) := by
rw [eq]
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left e.inv c.ι
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, `e : X ≅ X'` and `g' : X' ⟶ Y` is a morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{X' Y' : C} (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (e : X ≅ X')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') (c.ι ≫ e.hom) (by simp [← iff])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun s hs ↦ hc.lift (KernelFork.ofι (ι := s ≫ e.inv)
(by rw [iff, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, hs])))
(fun s hs ↦ by simp [← cancel_mono e.inv])
(fun s hs m hm ↦ Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by simpa [← cancel_mono e.hom] using hm))
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, and `g' : X ⟶ Y'` is a another morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff' {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{Y' : C} (g' : X ⟶ Y')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') c.ι (by simp [← iff])) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff hc g' (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using iff))
(Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
end
namespace KernelFork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of kernel forks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsLimit (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ⟶ kf'.pt :=
hf'.lift (KernelFork.ofι (kf.ι ≫ φ.left) (by simp))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapOfIsLimit_ι (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ ≫ kf'.ι = kf.ι ≫ φ.left :=
hf'.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit kernel forks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsLimit {kf : KernelFork f} {kf' : KernelFork f'}
(hf : IsLimit kf) (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ≅ kf'.pt where
hom := kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ.hom
inv := kf'.mapOfIsLimit hf φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end KernelFork
section
variable [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism, expressed as the equalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev kernel (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] : C :=
equalizer f 0
/-- The map from `kernel f` into the source of `f`. -/
abbrev kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X :=
equalizer.ι f 0
@[simp]
theorem equalizer_as_kernel : equalizer.ι f 0 = kernel.ι f := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0 :=
KernelFork.condition _
/-- The kernel built from `kernel.ι f` is limiting. -/
def kernelIsKernel : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (kernel.ι f) ((kernel.condition f).trans comp_zero.symm)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- Given any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0`, `k` factors through `kernel.ι f`
via `kernel.lift : W ⟶ kernel f`. -/
abbrev kernel.lift {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f :=
(kernelIsKernel f).lift (KernelFork.ofι k h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.lift_ι {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : kernel.lift f k h ≫ kernel.ι f = k :=
(kernelIsKernel f).fac (KernelFork.ofι k h) WalkingParallelPair.zero
@[simp]
theorem kernel.lift_zero {W : C} {h} : kernel.lift f (0 : W ⟶ X) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
instance kernel.lift_mono {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) [Mono k] : Mono (kernel.lift f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := w =≫ kernel.ι f
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.lift_ι] at w
exact (cancel_mono k).1 w⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ kernel f` such that
`l ≫ kernel.ι f = k`. -/
def kernel.lift' {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ kernel f // l ≫ kernel.ι f = k } :=
⟨kernel.lift f k h, kernel.lift_ι _ _ _⟩
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of kernels. -/
abbrev kernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : kernel f ⟶ kernel f' :=
kernel.lift f' (kernel.ι f ≫ p) (by simp [← w])
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
X ---> kernel g
| |
| | kernel.map
| |
v v
X' --> kernel g'
-/
theorem kernel.lift_map {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(f' : X' ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') [HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
kernel.lift g f w ≫ kernel.map g g' q r h₂ = p ≫ kernel.lift g' f' w' := by
ext; simp [h₁]
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of kernels. -/
@[simps]
def kernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : kernel f ≅ kernel f' where
hom := kernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv :=
kernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv
(by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
/-- Every kernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance kernel.ι_zero_isIso : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
theorem eq_zero_of_epi_kernel [Epi (kernel.ι f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_epi (kernel.ι f)).1 (by simp)
/-- The kernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def kernelZeroIsoSource : kernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ X :=
equalizer.isoSourceOfSelf 0
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_hom : kernelZeroIsoSource.hom = kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_inv :
kernelZeroIsoSource.inv = kernel.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 X) (by simp) := by
ext
simp [kernelZeroIsoSource]
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their kernels are isomorphic. -/
def kernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g :=
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : kernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (kernel f) := by
ext
simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
/- Porting note: induction on Eq is trying instantiate another g... -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ kernel.ι g = kernel.ι f := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ kernel.ι _ = kernel.ι _ := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).hom = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).inv = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] [HasKernel h] (w₁ : f = g)
(w₂ : g = h) : kernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ kernelIsoOfEq w₂ = kernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
variable {f}
theorem kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : ¬Epi (kernel.ι f) := fun _ =>
w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
theorem kernel_not_iso_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso (kernel.ι f) → False := fun _ =>
kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero w inferInstance
instance hasKernel_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] :
HasKernel (f ≫ g) :=
⟨⟨{ cone := _
isLimit := isKernelCompMono (limit.isLimit _) g rfl }⟩⟩
/-- When `g` is a monomorphism, the kernel of `f ≫ g` is isomorphic to the kernel of `f`.
-/
@[simps]
def kernelCompMono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel f] [Mono g] :
kernel (f ≫ g) ≅ kernel f where
hom :=
kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _)
(by
rw [← cancel_mono g]
simp)
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _) (by simp)
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The `symm` wasn't previously necessary. -/
instance hasKernel_iso_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [HasKernel g] :
HasKernel (f ≫ g) where
exists_limit :=
⟨{ cone := KernelFork.ofι (kernel.ι g ≫ inv f) (by simp)
isLimit := isLimitAux _ (fun s => kernel.lift _ (s.ι ≫ f) (by simp))
(by simp) fun s m w => by
simp_rw [← w]
symm
apply equalizer.hom_ext
simp }⟩
/-- When `f` is an isomorphism, the kernel of `f ≫ g` is isomorphic to the kernel of `g`.
-/
@[simps]
def kernelIsIsoComp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [HasKernel g] :
kernel (f ≫ g) ≅ kernel g where
hom := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _ ≫ f) (by simp)
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _ ≫ inv f) (by simp)
/-- Equal maps have isomorphic kernels. -/
@[simps] def kernel.congr {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g]
(h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g where
hom := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι f) (by simp [← h])
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι g) (by simp [h])
end
section HasZeroObject
variable [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
/-- The morphism from the zero object determines a cone on a kernel diagram -/
def kernel.zeroKernelFork : KernelFork f where
pt := 0
π := { app := fun _ => 0 }
/-- The map from the zero object is a kernel of a monomorphism -/
def kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone [Mono f] : IsLimit (kernel.zeroKernelFork f) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun _ => 0)
(fun s => by
rw [zero_comp]
refine (zero_of_comp_mono f ?_).symm
exact KernelFork.condition _)
fun _ _ _ => zero_of_to_zero _
/-- The kernel of a monomorphism is isomorphic to the zero object -/
def kernel.ofMono [HasKernel f] [Mono f] : kernel f ≅ 0 :=
Functor.mapIso (Cones.forget _) <|
IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit (parallelPair f 0)) (kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone f)
/-- The kernel morphism of a monomorphism is a zero morphism -/
theorem kernel.ι_of_mono [HasKernel f] [Mono f] : kernel.ι f = 0 :=
zero_of_source_iso_zero _ (kernel.ofMono f)
/-- If `g ≫ f = 0` implies `g = 0` for all `g`, then `0 : 0 ⟶ X` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def zeroKernelOfCancelZero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(hf : ∀ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (_ : g ≫ f = 0), g = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (0 : 0 ⟶ X) (show 0 ≫ f = 0 by simp)) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [hf _ _ (KernelFork.condition s), zero_comp])
fun s m _ => by dsimp; apply HasZeroObject.to_zero_ext
end HasZeroObject
section Transport
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `l ≫ i.hom = f`, any kernel of `f` is a kernel of `l`. -/
def IsKernel.ofCompIso {Z : C} (l : X ⟶ Z) (i : Z ≅ Y) (h : l ≫ i.hom = f) {s : KernelFork f}
(hs : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (Fork.ι s) <| show Fork.ι s ≫ l = 0 by simp [← i.comp_inv_eq.2 h.symm]) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι (Fork.ι s) <| by simp [← h])
(fun s => by simp) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hs
simpa using h
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `l ≫ i.hom = f`, the kernel of `f` is a kernel of `l`. -/
def kernel.ofCompIso [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (l : X ⟶ Z) (i : Z ≅ Y) (h : l ≫ i.hom = f) :
IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (kernel.ι f) <| show kernel.ι f ≫ l = 0 by simp [← i.comp_inv_eq.2 h.symm]) :=
IsKernel.ofCompIso f l i h <| limit.isLimit _
/-- If `s` is any limit kernel cone over `f` and if `i` is an isomorphism such that
`i.hom ≫ s.ι = l`, then `l` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def IsKernel.isoKernel {Z : C} (l : Z ⟶ X) {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) (i : Z ≅ s.pt)
(h : i.hom ≫ Fork.ι s = l) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι l <| show l ≫ f = 0 by simp [← h]) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hs <|
Cones.ext i.symm fun j => by
cases j
· exact (Iso.eq_inv_comp i).2 h
· dsimp; rw [← h]; simp
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `i.hom ≫ kernel.ι f = l`, then `l` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def kernel.isoKernel [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (l : Z ⟶ X) (i : Z ≅ kernel f)
(h : i.hom ≫ kernel.ι f = l) :
IsLimit (@KernelFork.ofι _ _ _ _ _ f _ l <| by simp [← h]) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel f l (limit.isLimit _) i h
end Transport
section
variable (X Y)
/-- The kernel morphism of a zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
theorem kernel.ι_of_zero : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
end
section
/-- A cokernel cofork is just a cofork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev CokernelCofork :=
Cofork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem CokernelCofork.condition (s : CokernelCofork f) : f ≫ s.π = 0 := by
rw [Cofork.condition, zero_comp]
theorem CokernelCofork.π_eq_zero (s : CokernelCofork f) : s.ι.app zero = 0 := by
simp [Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right]
/-- A morphism `π` satisfying `f ≫ π = 0` determines a cokernel cofork on `f`. -/
abbrev CokernelCofork.ofπ {Z : C} (π : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ π = 0) : CokernelCofork f :=
Cofork.ofπ π <| by rw [w, zero_comp]
@[simp]
theorem CokernelCofork.π_ofπ {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = 0) :
Cofork.π (CokernelCofork.ofπ π w) = π :=
rfl
/-- Every cokernel cofork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `cofork.ofπ (cofork.π s) _`. -/
def isoOfπ (s : Cofork f 0) : s ≅ Cofork.ofπ (Cofork.π s) (Cofork.condition s) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases j <;> aesop_cat
/-- If `π = π'`, then `CokernelCofork.of_π π _` and `CokernelCofork.of_π π' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofπCongr {P : C} {π π' : Y ⟶ P} {w : f ≫ π = 0} (h : π = π') :
CokernelCofork.ofπ π w ≅ CokernelCofork.ofπ π' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases j <;> aesop_cat
/-- If `s` is a colimit cokernel cofork, then every `k : Y ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ k = 0` induces
`l : s.X ⟶ W` such that `cofork.π s ≫ l = k`. -/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' {s : CokernelCofork f} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = 0) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // Cofork.π s ≫ l = k } :=
⟨hs.desc <| CokernelCofork.ofπ _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a cokernel cofork is a colimit cocone.
It only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isColimitAux (t : CokernelCofork f) (desc : ∀ s : CokernelCofork f, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : CokernelCofork f, t.π ≫ desc s = s.π)
(uniq : ∀ (s : CokernelCofork f) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt) (_ : t.π ≫ m = s.π), m = desc s) :
IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· simp
· exact fac s
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.one) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `CokernelCofork` constructed using
`CokernelCofork.ofπ` is a limit cone.
-/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ {Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (eq : f ≫ g = 0)
(desc : ∀ {Z' : C} (g' : Y ⟶ Z') (_ : f ≫ g' = 0), Z ⟶ Z')
(fac : ∀ {Z' : C} (g' : Y ⟶ Z') (eq' : f ≫ g' = 0), g ≫ desc g' eq' = g')
(uniq :
∀ {Z' : C} (g' : Y ⟶ Z') (eq' : f ≫ g' = 0) (m : Z ⟶ Z') (_ : g ≫ m = g'), m = desc g' eq') :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ g eq) :=
isColimitAux _ (fun s => desc s.π s.condition) (fun s => fac s.π s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.π s.condition
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `CokernelCofork` of the form
`CokernelCofork.ofπ p _` is a colimit cocone when we know that `p` is an epimorphism. -/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ' {X Y Q : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (p : Y ⟶ Q) (w : f ≫ p = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : Y ⟶ A) (_ : f ≫ k = 0), { l : Q ⟶ A // p ≫ l = k}) [hp : Epi p] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ p w) :=
ofπ _ _ (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_epi p, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every cokernel of `f` induces a cokernel of `g ≫ f` if `g` is epi. -/
def isCokernelEpiComp {c : CokernelCofork f} (i : IsColimit c) {W} (g : W ⟶ X) [hg : Epi g]
{h : W ⟶ Y} (hh : h = g ≫ f) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ c.π (by rw [hh]; simp) : CokernelCofork h) :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : CokernelCofork f :=
Cofork.ofπ s.π
(by
apply hg.left_cancellation
rw [← Category.assoc, ← hh, s.condition]
simp)
let l := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' i s'.π s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext i; rw [Cofork.π_ofπ] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCokernelEpiComp_desc {c : CokernelCofork f} (i : IsColimit c) {W} (g : W ⟶ X) [hg : Epi g]
{h : W ⟶ Y} (hh : h = g ≫ f) (s : CokernelCofork h) :
(isCokernelEpiComp i g hh).desc s =
i.desc
(Cofork.ofπ s.π
(by
rw [← cancel_epi g, ← Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) :=
rfl
/-- Every cokernel of `g ≫ f` is also a cokernel of `f`, as long as `f ≫ c.π` vanishes. -/
def isCokernelOfComp {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) {c : CokernelCofork h} (i : IsColimit c)
(hf : f ≫ c.π = 0) (hfg : g ≫ f = h) : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ c.π hf) :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => i.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ s.π (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc]) fun s m h => by
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext i
simpa using h
/-- `Y` identifies to the cokernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (𝟙 Y) (show f ≫ 𝟙 Y = 0 by rw [hf, zero_comp])) :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.id_comp _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.id_comp])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the cokernel of a given epimorphisms. -/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : CokernelCofork f)
(hf : Epi f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsColimit c :=
isColimitAux _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [comp_zero, ← cancel_epi f, comp_zero, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_src _ _)
lemma CokernelCofork.IsColimit.isIso_π {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : CokernelCofork f)
(hc : IsColimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.π := by
let e : c.pt ≅ Y := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : c.π ≫ e.hom = 𝟙 Y := Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hc
haveI : IsIso (c.π ≫ e.hom) := by
rw [eq]
dsimp
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right c.π e.hom
/-- If `c` is a colimit cokernel cofork for `f : X ⟶ Y`, `e : Y ≅ Y'` and `f' : X' ⟶ Y` is a
morphism, then there is a colimit cokernel cofork for `f'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : Y ⟶ W`, there is an equivalence `f ≫ φ = 0 ↔ f' ≫ e.hom ≫ φ = 0`. -/
def CokernelCofork.isColimitOfIsColimitOfIff {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {c : CokernelCofork f}
(hc : IsColimit c) {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (e : Y' ≅ Y)
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : Y ⟶ W), f ≫ φ = 0 ↔ f' ≫ e.hom ≫ φ = 0) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (f := f') (e.hom ≫ c.π) (by simp [← iff])) :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun s hs ↦ hc.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ (π := e.inv ≫ s)
(by rw [iff, e.hom_inv_id_assoc, hs])))
(fun s hs ↦ by simp [← cancel_epi e.inv])
(fun s hs m hm ↦ Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simpa [← cancel_epi e.hom] using hm))
/-- If `c` is a colimit cokernel cofork for `f : X ⟶ Y`, and `f' : X' ⟶ Y is another
morphism, then there is a colimit cokernel cofork for `f'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : Y ⟶ W`, there is an equivalence `f ≫ φ = 0 ↔ f' ≫ φ = 0`. -/
def CokernelCofork.isColimitOfIsColimitOfIff' {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {c : CokernelCofork f}
(hc : IsColimit c) {X' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y)
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : Y ⟶ W), f ≫ φ = 0 ↔ f' ≫ φ = 0) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (f := f') c.π (by simp [← iff])) :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (isColimitOfIsColimitOfIff hc f' (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using iff))
(Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
end
namespace CokernelCofork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of cokernel coforks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsColimit {cc : CokernelCofork f} (hf : IsColimit cc) (cc' : CokernelCofork f')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : cc.pt ⟶ cc'.pt :=
hf.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ (φ.right ≫ cc'.π) (by
erw [← Arrow.w_assoc φ, condition, comp_zero]))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_mapOfIsColimit {cc : CokernelCofork f} (hf : IsColimit cc) (cc' : CokernelCofork f')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
cc.π ≫ mapOfIsColimit hf cc' φ = φ.right ≫ cc'.π :=
hf.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit cokernel coforks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsColimit {cc : CokernelCofork f} {cc' : CokernelCofork f'}
(hf : IsColimit cc) (hf' : IsColimit cc')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : cc.pt ≅ cc'.pt where
hom := mapOfIsColimit hf cc' φ.hom
inv := mapOfIsColimit hf' cc φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end CokernelCofork
section
variable [HasCokernel f]
/-- The cokernel of a morphism, expressed as the coequalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev cokernel : C :=
coequalizer f 0
/-- The map from the target of `f` to `cokernel f`. -/
abbrev cokernel.π : Y ⟶ cokernel f :=
coequalizer.π f 0
@[simp]
theorem coequalizer_as_cokernel : coequalizer.π f 0 = cokernel.π f :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem cokernel.condition : f ≫ cokernel.π f = 0 :=
CokernelCofork.condition _
/-- The cokernel built from `cokernel.π f` is colimiting. -/
def cokernelIsCokernel :
IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ (cokernel.π f) ((cokernel.condition f).trans zero_comp.symm)) :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit _) (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
/-- Given any morphism `k : Y ⟶ W` such that `f ≫ k = 0`, `k` factors through `cokernel.π f`
via `cokernel.desc : cokernel f ⟶ W`. -/
abbrev cokernel.desc {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W) (h : f ≫ k = 0) : cokernel f ⟶ W :=
(cokernelIsCokernel f).desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem cokernel.π_desc {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W) (h : f ≫ k = 0) :
cokernel.π f ≫ cokernel.desc f k h = k :=
(cokernelIsCokernel f).fac (CokernelCofork.ofπ k h) WalkingParallelPair.one
-- Porting note: added to ease the port of `Abelian.Exact`
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma colimit_ι_zero_cokernel_desc {C : Type*} [Category C]
[HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : f ≫ g = 0) [HasCokernel f] :
colimit.ι (parallelPair f 0) WalkingParallelPair.zero ≫ cokernel.desc f g h = 0 := by
rw [(colimit.w (parallelPair f 0) WalkingParallelPairHom.left).symm]
simp
@[simp]
theorem cokernel.desc_zero {W : C} {h} : cokernel.desc f (0 : Y ⟶ W) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
instance cokernel.desc_epi {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W) (h : f ≫ k = 0) [Epi k] :
Epi (cokernel.desc f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := cokernel.π f ≫= w
simp only [cokernel.π_desc_assoc] at w
exact (cancel_epi k).1 w⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : Y ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ k = 0` induces `l : cokernel f ⟶ W` such that
`cokernel.π f ≫ l = k`. -/
def cokernel.desc' {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W) (h : f ≫ k = 0) :
{ l : cokernel f ⟶ W // cokernel.π f ≫ l = k } :=
⟨cokernel.desc f k h, cokernel.π_desc _ _ _⟩
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of cokernels. -/
abbrev cokernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasCokernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : cokernel f ⟶ cokernel f' :=
cokernel.desc f (q ≫ cokernel.π f') (by
have : f ≫ q ≫ π f' = p ≫ f' ≫ π f' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc]
apply congrArg (· ≫ π f') w
simp [this])
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
cokernel f ---> Z
| |
| cokernel.map |
| |
v v
cokernel f' --> Z'
-/
theorem cokernel.map_desc {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasCokernel f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : f ≫ g = 0) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasCokernel f'] (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X')
(q : Y ⟶ Y') (r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
cokernel.map f f' p q h₁ ≫ cokernel.desc f' g' w' = cokernel.desc f g w ≫ r := by
ext; simp [h₂]
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of cokernels. -/
@[simps]
def cokernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasCokernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : cokernel f ≅ cokernel f' where
hom := cokernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv := cokernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv (by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
/-- The cokernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance cokernel.π_zero_isIso : IsIso (cokernel.π (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
coequalizer.π_of_self _
theorem eq_zero_of_mono_cokernel [Mono (cokernel.π f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_mono (cokernel.π f)).1 (by simp)
/-- The cokernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the target. -/
def cokernelZeroIsoTarget : cokernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ Y :=
coequalizer.isoTargetOfSelf 0
@[simp]
theorem cokernelZeroIsoTarget_hom :
cokernelZeroIsoTarget.hom = cokernel.desc (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 Y) (by simp) := by
ext; simp [cokernelZeroIsoTarget]
@[simp]
theorem cokernelZeroIsoTarget_inv : cokernelZeroIsoTarget.inv = cokernel.π (0 : X ⟶ Y) :=
rfl
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their cokernels are isomorphic. -/
def cokernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] (h : f = g) :
cokernel f ≅ cokernel g :=
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (by simp [h]; rfl)
@[simp]
theorem cokernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : cokernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (cokernel f) := by
ext; simp [cokernelIsoOfEq]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem π_comp_cokernelIsoOfEq_hom {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] (h : f = g) :
cokernel.π f ≫ (cokernelIsoOfEq h).hom = cokernel.π g := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem π_comp_cokernelIsoOfEq_inv {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] (h : f = g) :
cokernel.π _ ≫ (cokernelIsoOfEq h).inv = cokernel.π _ := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem cokernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_desc {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Y ⟶ Z) (he) :
(cokernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ cokernel.desc _ e he = cokernel.desc _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem cokernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_desc {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Y ⟶ Z) (he) :
(cokernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ cokernel.desc _ e he = cokernel.desc _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[simp]
theorem cokernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasCokernel f] [HasCokernel g] [HasCokernel h]
(w₁ : f = g) (w₂ : g = h) :
cokernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ cokernelIsoOfEq w₂ = cokernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [cokernelIsoOfEq]
variable {f}
theorem cokernel_not_mono_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : ¬Mono (cokernel.π f) := fun _ =>
w (eq_zero_of_mono_cokernel f)
theorem cokernel_not_iso_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso (cokernel.π f) → False := fun _ =>
cokernel_not_mono_of_nonzero w inferInstance
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
| The `symm` wasn't previously necessary. -/
-- TODO the remainder of this section has obvious generalizations to `HasCoequalizer f g`.
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 885 | 886 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Preorder.Chain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linter.DeprecatedModule
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Order/Chain.lean | 128 | 134 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Pi
/-!
# Injectivity of `Int.Cast` into characteristic zero rings and fields.
-/
open Nat Set
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_div_charZero {k : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [CharZero k] {m n : ℤ} (n_dvd : n ∣ m) :
| ((m / n : ℤ) : k) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp [Int.ediv_zero]
· exact cast_div n_dvd (cast_ne_zero.mpr hn)
| Mathlib/Data/Int/CharZero.lean | 24 | 28 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
| rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 312 | 314 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PurelyInseparable.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PerfectClosure
/-!
# `IsPerfectClosure` predicate
This file contains `IsPerfectClosure` which asserts that `L` is a perfect closure of `K` under a
ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L`, as well as its basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `pNilradical`: given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`).
- `IsPRadical`: a ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L` of characteristic `p` rings is called `p`-radical,
if or any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`,
and the kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
A generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields.
- `IsPerfectClosure`: if `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a
perfect closure of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite.
- `PerfectRing.lift`: if a `p`-radical ring homomorphism `K →+* L` is given, `M` is a perfect ring,
then any ring homomorphism `K →+* M` can be lifted to `L →+* M`.
This is similar to `IsAlgClosed.lift` and `IsSepClosed.lift`.
- `PerfectRing.liftEquiv`: `K →+* M` is one-to-one correspondence to `L →+* M`,
given by `PerfectRing.lift`. This is a generalization to `PerfectClosure.lift`.
- `IsPerfectClosure.equiv`: perfect closures of a ring are isomorphic.
## Main results
- `IsPRadical.trans`: composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical.
- `PerfectClosure.isPRadical`: the absolute perfect closure `PerfectClosure` is a `p`-radical
extension over the base ring, in particular, it is a perfect closure of the base ring.
- `IsPRadical.isPurelyInseparable`, `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical`: `p`-radical and
purely inseparable are equivalent for fields.
- The (relative) perfect closure `perfectClosure` is a perfect closure
(inferred from `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical` automatically by Lean).
## Tags
perfect ring, perfect closure, purely inseparable
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
/-- Given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`). -/
def pNilradical (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Ideal R := if 1 < p then nilradical R else ⊥
theorem pNilradical_le_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} :
pNilradical R p ≤ nilradical R := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
simp_rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp, bot_le]
theorem pNilradical_eq_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := by rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬ 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := by rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot' {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≤ 1) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot (not_lt.2 hp)
theorem pNilradical_prime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp.one_lt
theorem pNilradical_one {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] :
pNilradical R 1 = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot' rfl.le
theorem mem_pNilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} {x : R} :
x ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = 0 := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, ?_⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨p ^ n, h⟩⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel ((n.lt_pow_self hp).le), pow_add, h, mul_zero]
rw [pNilradical_eq_bot hp, Ideal.mem_bot]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨0, by rw [pow_zero, pow_one, h]⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 (not_lt.1 hp) with hp | hp
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rwa [hn, pow_zero, pow_one] at h
rw [hp, zero_pow hn, pow_zero] at h
subsingleton [subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h.symm]
rwa [hp, one_pow, pow_one] at h
theorem sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [ExpChar R p]
{x y : R} : x - y ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = y ^ p ^ n := by
simp_rw [mem_pNilradical, sub_pow_expChar_pow, sub_eq_zero]
theorem pow_expChar_pow_inj_of_pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : pNilradical R p = ⊥) (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun x : R ↦ x ^ p ^ n := fun _ _ H ↦
sub_eq_zero.1 <| Ideal.mem_bot.1 <| h ▸ sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq.2 ⟨n, H⟩
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : Function.Injective (frobenius R p)) : pNilradical R p = ⊥ := bot_unique fun x ↦ by
rw [mem_pNilradical, Ideal.mem_bot]
exact fun ⟨n, _⟩ ↦ h.iterate n (by rwa [← coe_iterateFrobenius, map_zero])
theorem PerfectRing.pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
[PerfectRing R p] : pNilradical R p = ⊥ :=
pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj R p (injective_frobenius R p)
section IsPerfectClosure
variable {K L M N : Type*}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring K] [CommSemiring L] [CommSemiring M]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (f : L →+* M) (p : ℕ)
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a ring homomorphism of characteristic `p` rings, then it is called
`p`-radical if the following conditions are satisfied:
- For any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`.
- The kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
It is a generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsPRadical : Prop where
pow_mem' : ∀ x : L, ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n
ker_le' : RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p
theorem IsPRadical.pow_mem [IsPRadical i p] (x : L) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n := pow_mem' x
theorem IsPRadical.ker_le [IsPRadical i p] :
RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p := ker_le'
theorem IsPRadical.comap_pNilradical [IsPRadical i p] :
(pNilradical L p).comap i = pNilradical K p := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x h ↦ mem_pNilradical.2 ?_) (fun x h ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| Ideal.mem_comap.1 h
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| ker_le i p ((map_pow i x _).symm ▸ h)
exact ⟨n + m, by rwa [pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
simp only [Ideal.mem_comap, mem_pNilradical] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨n, by simpa only [map_pow, map_zero] using congr(i $h)⟩
variable (K) in
instance IsPRadical.of_id : IsPRadical (RingHom.id K) p where
pow_mem' x := ⟨0, x, by simp⟩
ker_le' x h := by convert Ideal.zero_mem _
/-- Composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical. -/
theorem IsPRadical.trans [IsPRadical i p] [IsPRadical f p] :
IsPRadical (f.comp i) p where
pow_mem' x := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hy⟩ := pow_mem f p x
obtain ⟨m, z, hz⟩ := pow_mem i p y
exact ⟨n + m, z, by rw [RingHom.comp_apply, hz, map_pow, hy, pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
ker_le' x h := by
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.comp_apply, ← RingHom.mem_ker] at h
simpa only [← Ideal.mem_comap, comap_pNilradical] using ker_le f p h
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a perfect closure
of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
In this case the kernel of `i` is equal to the `p`-nilradical of `K`
(see `IsPerfectClosure.ker_eq`).
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
abbrev IsPerfectClosure [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] := IsPRadical i p
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a ring homomorphism of exponential characteristic `p` rings, such that `L`
is perfect, then the `p`-nilradical of `K` is contained in the kernel of `i`. -/
theorem RingHom.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] :
pNilradical K p ≤ RingHom.ker i := fun x h ↦ by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 h
replace h := congr((iterateFrobeniusEquiv L p n).symm (i $h))
rwa [map_pow, ← iterateFrobenius_def, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
map_zero, map_zero] at h
variable [ExpChar L p] in
theorem IsPerfectClosure.ker_eq [PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p] :
RingHom.ker i = pNilradical K p :=
IsPRadical.ker_le'.antisymm (i.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing p)
namespace PerfectRing
/- NOTE: To define `PerfectRing.lift_aux`, only the `IsPRadical.pow_mem` is required, but not
`IsPRadical.ker_le`. But in order to use typeclass, here we require the whole `IsPRadical`. -/
variable [ExpChar M p] [PerfectRing M p] [IsPRadical i p]
theorem lift_aux (x : L) : ∃ y : ℕ × K, i y.2 = x ^ p ^ y.1 := by
obtain ⟨n, y, h⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x
exact ⟨(n, y), h⟩
/-- If `i : K →+* L` and `j : K →+* M` are ring homomorphisms of characteristic `p` rings, such that
`i` is `p`-radical (in fact only the `IsPRadical.pow_mem` is required) and `M` is a perfect ring,
then one can define a map `L → M` which maps an element `x` of `L` to `y ^ (p ^ -n)` if
`x ^ (p ^ n)` is equal to some element `y` of `K`. -/
def liftAux (x : L) : M := (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).1).symm
(j (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).2)
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_self_apply [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] (x : L) : liftAux i i p x = x := by
rw [liftAux, Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux i p x), ← iterateFrobenius_def,
← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_self [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] : liftAux i i p = id :=
funext (liftAux_self_apply i p)
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_id_apply (x : K) : liftAux (RingHom.id K) j p x = j x := by
have := RingHom.id_apply _ ▸ Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux (RingHom.id K) p x)
rw [liftAux, this, map_pow, ← iterateFrobenius_def, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply,
RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_id : liftAux (RingHom.id K) j p = j := funext (liftAux_id_apply j p)
end PerfectRing
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [CommRing L] [CommRing M] [CommRing N]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (k : K →+* N) (f : L →+* M) (g : L →+* N)
(p : ℕ) [ExpChar M p]
namespace IsPRadical
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical, then for any ring `M` of exponential charactistic `p` whose
`p`-nilradical is zero, the map `(L →+* M) → (K →+* M)` induced by `i` is injective. -/
theorem injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot [IsPRadical i p] (h : pNilradical M p = ⊥) :
Function.Injective fun f : L →+* M ↦ f.comp i := fun f g heq ↦ by
ext x
obtain ⟨n, y, hx⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x
apply_fun _ using pow_expChar_pow_inj_of_pNilradical_eq_bot M p h n
simpa only [← map_pow, ← hx] using congr($(heq) y)
variable (M)
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical, then for any reduced ring `M` of exponential charactistic `p`,
the map `(L →+* M) → (K →+* M)` induced by `i` is injective.
A special case of `IsPRadical.injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot`
and a generalization of `IsPurelyInseparable.injective_comp_algebraMap`. -/
theorem injective_comp [IsPRadical i p] [IsReduced M] :
Function.Injective fun f : L →+* M ↦ f.comp i :=
injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot i p <| bot_unique <|
pNilradical_le_nilradical.trans (nilradical_eq_zero M).le
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical, then for any perfect ring `M` of exponential charactistic `p`,
the map `(L →+* M) → (K →+* M)` induced by `i` is injective.
A special case of `IsPRadical.injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot`. -/
theorem injective_comp_of_perfect [IsPRadical i p] [PerfectRing M p] :
Function.Injective fun f : L →+* M ↦ f.comp i :=
injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot i p (PerfectRing.pNilradical_eq_bot M p)
end IsPRadical
namespace PerfectRing
variable [ExpChar K p] [PerfectRing M p] [IsPRadical i p]
/-- If `i : K →+* L` and `j : K →+* M` are ring homomorphisms of characteristic `p` rings, such that
`i` is `p`-radical, and `M` is a perfect ring, then `PerfectRing.liftAux` is well-defined. -/
theorem liftAux_apply (x : L) (n : ℕ) (y : K) (h : i y = x ^ p ^ n) :
| liftAux i j p x = (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p n).symm (j y) := by
rw [liftAux]
have h' := Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux i p x)
set n' := (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).1
replace h := congr($(h.symm) ^ p ^ n')
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, ← h', ← map_pow, ← map_pow, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub,
← RingHom.mem_ker] at h
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 (IsPRadical.ker_le i p h)
refine (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p (m + n + n')).injective ?_
conv_lhs => rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n n', ← add_assoc,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply (m := m + n'), RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def,
← sub_eq_zero, ← map_pow, ← map_pow, ← map_sub,
add_comm m, add_comm m, pow_add, pow_mul, pow_add, pow_mul, ← sub_pow_expChar_pow, h, map_zero]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsPerfectClosure.lean | 289 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Equiv
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Simps.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Substs
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we define two types:
* `Equiv α β` a.k.a. `α ≃ β`: a bijective map `α → β` bundled with its inverse map; we use this (and
not equality!) to express that various `Type`s or `Sort`s are equivalent.
* `Equiv.Perm α`: the group of permutations `α ≃ α`. More lemmas about `Equiv.Perm` can be found in
`Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm`.
Then we define
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.refl α` is the identity map interpreted as `α ≃ α`;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.symm e : β ≃ α` is the inverse of `e : α ≃ β`;
- `Equiv.trans e₁ e₂ : α ≃ γ` is the composition of `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ` (note the order
of the arguments!);
* definitions that transfer some instances along an equivalence. By convention, we transfer
instances from right to left.
- `Equiv.inhabited` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Inhabited β]` and returns `Inhabited α`;
- `Equiv.unique` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Unique β]` and returns `Unique α`;
- `Equiv.decidableEq` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[DecidableEq β]` and returns `DecidableEq α`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
Many more such isomorphisms and operations are defined in `Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic`.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
open Function
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
/-- `α ≃ β` is the type of functions from `α → β` with a two-sided inverse. -/
structure Equiv (α : Sort*) (β : Sort _) where
protected toFun : α → β
protected invFun : β → α
protected left_inv : LeftInverse invFun toFun
protected right_inv : RightInverse invFun toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ " => Equiv
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `EquivLike F α β` into an actual
`Equiv`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃ β`. -/
@[coe]
def EquivLike.toEquiv {F} [EquivLike F α β] (f : F) : α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := EquivLike.inv f
left_inv := EquivLike.left_inv f
right_inv := EquivLike.right_inv f
/-- Any type satisfying `EquivLike` can be cast into `Equiv` via `EquivLike.toEquiv`. -/
instance {F} [EquivLike F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃ β) :=
⟨EquivLike.toEquiv⟩
/-- `Perm α` is the type of bijections from `α` to itself. -/
abbrev Equiv.Perm (α : Sort*) :=
Equiv α α
namespace Equiv
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
inv := Equiv.invFun
left_inv := Equiv.left_inv
right_inv := Equiv.right_inv
coe_injective' e₁ e₂ h₁ h₂ := by cases e₁; cases e₂; congr
/-- Helper instance when inference gets stuck on following the normal chain
`EquivLike → FunLike`.
TODO: this instance doesn't appear to be necessary: remove it (after benchmarking?)
-/
instance : FunLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_coe {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
((e : α ≃ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : (Equiv.mk f g l r : α → β) = f :=
rfl
/-- The map `(r ≃ s) → (r → s)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : @Function.Injective (α ≃ β) (α → β) (fun e => e) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective'
protected theorem coe_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ β} : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
@DFunLike.coe_fn_eq _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : Equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := DFunLike.ext f g H
protected theorem congr_arg {f : Equiv α β} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : Equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[ext] theorem Perm.ext {σ τ : Equiv.Perm α} (H : ∀ x, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ := Equiv.ext H
protected theorem Perm.congr_arg {f : Equiv.Perm α} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
Equiv.congr_arg
protected theorem Perm.congr_fun {f g : Equiv.Perm α} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
Equiv.congr_fun h x
/-- Any type is equivalent to itself. -/
@[refl] protected def refl (α : Sort*) : α ≃ α := ⟨id, id, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (α ≃ α) := ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩
/-- Inverse of an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.invFun, e.toFun, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) : β → α := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections Equiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.left_inv` in terms of `Function.LeftInverse`. -/
theorem left_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e := e.left_inv
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.right_inv` in terms of `Function.RightInverse`. -/
theorem right_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e := e.right_inv
/-- Composition of equivalences `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : α ≃ γ :=
⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm, e₂.left_inv.comp e₁.left_inv, e₂.right_inv.comp e₁.right_inv⟩
@[simps]
instance : Trans Equiv Equiv Equiv where
trans := Equiv.trans
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem toFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.toFun = e := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem invFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.invFun = e.symm := rfl
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ β) : Injective e := EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ β) : Surjective e := EquivLike.surjective e
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ β) : Bijective e := EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem subsingleton (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton α :=
e.injective.subsingleton
protected theorem subsingleton.symm (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton β :=
e.symm.injective.subsingleton
theorem subsingleton_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Subsingleton α ↔ Subsingleton β :=
⟨fun _ => e.symm.subsingleton, fun _ => e.subsingleton⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun f _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ (Equiv.subsingleton.symm f) _ _⟩
instance permUnique [Subsingleton α] : Unique (Perm α) :=
uniqueOfSubsingleton (Equiv.refl α)
theorem Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : e = Equiv.refl α :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
protected theorem nontrivial {α β} (e : α ≃ β) [Nontrivial β] : Nontrivial α :=
e.surjective.nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_congr {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : Nontrivial α ↔ Nontrivial β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ e.symm.nontrivial, fun _ ↦ e.nontrivial⟩
/-- Transfer `DecidableEq` across an equivalence. -/
protected def decidableEq (e : α ≃ β) [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq α :=
e.injective.decidableEq
theorem nonempty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Nonempty α ↔ Nonempty β := Nonempty.congr e e.symm
protected theorem nonempty (e : α ≃ β) [Nonempty β] : Nonempty α := e.nonempty_congr.mpr ‹_›
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is inhabited, then so is `α`. -/
protected def inhabited [Inhabited β] (e : α ≃ β) : Inhabited α := ⟨e.symm default⟩
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is a singleton type, then so is `α`. -/
protected def unique [Unique β] (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α := e.symm.surjective.unique
/-- Equivalence between equal types. -/
protected def cast {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : α ≃ β :=
⟨cast h, cast h.symm, fun _ => by cases h; rfl, fun _ => by cases h; rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : ((Equiv.mk f g l r).symm : β → α) = g := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_refl : (Equiv.refl α : α → α) = id := rfl
/-- This cannot be a `simp` lemmas as it incorrectly matches against `e : α ≃ synonym α`, when
`synonym α` is semireducible. This makes a mess of `Multiplicative.ofAdd` etc. -/
theorem Perm.coe_subsingleton {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : (e : α → α) = id := by
rw [Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl e, coe_refl]
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : Equiv.refl α x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) : (f.trans g : α → γ) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x := e.right_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.apply_coe_symm_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : β) :
e ((e : α ≃ β).symm x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_apply_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : α) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm (e x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_apply_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_comp_self {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm ∘ e = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_comp_self
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.self_comp_coe_symm {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
e ∘ (e : α ≃ β).symm = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : γ) :
(f.trans g).symm a = f.symm (g.symm a) := rfl
theorem symm_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (b : α) : f.symm.symm b = f b := rfl
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (f : α ≃ β) {x y : α} : f x = f y ↔ x = y := EquivLike.apply_eq_iff_eq f
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply {x : α} {y : β} (f : α ≃ β) : f x = y ↔ x = f.symm y := by
conv_lhs => rw [← apply_symm_apply f y]
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp] theorem cast_apply {α β} (h : α = β) (x : α) : Equiv.cast h x = cast h x := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_symm {α β} (h : α = β) : (Equiv.cast h).symm = Equiv.cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {α} (h : α = α := rfl) : Equiv.cast h = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {α β γ} (h : α = β) (h2 : β = γ) :
(Equiv.cast h).trans (Equiv.cast h2) = Equiv.cast (h.trans h2) :=
ext fun x => by substs h h2; rfl
theorem cast_eq_iff_heq {α β} (h : α = β) {a : α} {b : β} : Equiv.cast h a = b ↔ HEq a b := by
subst h; simp [coe_refl]
theorem symm_apply_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_symm_apply {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
(eq_comm.trans e.symm_apply_eq).trans eq_comm
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Equiv.symm : (α ≃ β) → β ≃ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] theorem trans_refl (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans (Equiv.refl β) = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_symm : (Equiv.refl α).symm = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_trans (e : α ≃ β) : (Equiv.refl α).trans e = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.trans e = Equiv.refl β := ext <| by simp
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans e.symm = Equiv.refl α := ext <| by simp
theorem trans_assoc {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.trans bc).trans cd = ab.trans (bc.trans cd) := Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem leftInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : LeftInverse f.symm f := f.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : Function.RightInverse f.symm f := f.right_inv
theorem injective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Injective (f ∘ e) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.injective_comp e f
theorem comp_injective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Injective (e ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.comp_injective f e
theorem surjective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Surjective (f ∘ e) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.surjective_comp e f
theorem comp_surjective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Surjective (e ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.comp_surjective f e
theorem bijective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Bijective (f ∘ e) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.bijective_comp e f
theorem comp_bijective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Bijective (e ∘ f) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.comp_bijective f e
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and `γ` is equivalent to `δ`, then the type of equivalences `α ≃ γ`
is equivalent to the type of equivalences `β ≃ δ`. -/
def equivCongr {δ : Sort*} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) : (α ≃ γ) ≃ (β ≃ δ) where
toFun ac := (ab.symm.trans ac).trans cd
invFun bd := ab.trans <| bd.trans <| cd.symm
left_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl {α β} :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α ≃ β) := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_symm {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.equivCongr cd).symm = ab.symm.equivCongr cd.symm := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_trans {δ ε ζ} (ab : α ≃ β) (de : δ ≃ ε) (bc : β ≃ γ) (ef : ε ≃ ζ) :
(ab.equivCongr de).trans (bc.equivCongr ef) = (ab.trans bc).equivCongr (de.trans ef) := by
ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_left {α β γ} (bg : β ≃ γ) (e : α ≃ β) :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr bg e = e.trans bg := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_right {α β} (ab e : α ≃ β) :
ab.equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) e = ab.symm.trans e := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_apply_apply {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) (e : α ≃ γ) (x) :
ab.equivCongr cd e x = cd (e (ab.symm x)) := rfl
section permCongr
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : α' ≃ β')
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Perm α` is equivalent to `Perm β`. -/
def permCongr : Perm α' ≃ Perm β' := equivCongr e e
theorem permCongr_def (p : Equiv.Perm α') : e.permCongr p = (e.symm.trans p).trans e := rfl
@[simp] theorem permCongr_refl : e.permCongr (Equiv.refl _) = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [permCongr_def]
@[simp] theorem permCongr_symm : e.permCongr.symm = e.symm.permCongr := rfl
@[simp] theorem permCongr_apply (p : Equiv.Perm α') (x) : e.permCongr p x = e (p (e.symm x)) := rfl
theorem permCongr_symm_apply (p : Equiv.Perm β') (x) :
e.permCongr.symm p x = e.symm (p (e x)) := rfl
theorem permCongr_trans (p p' : Equiv.Perm α') :
(e.permCongr p).trans (e.permCongr p') = e.permCongr (p.trans p') := by
ext; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, permCongr_apply, symm_apply_apply]
end permCongr
/-- Two empty types are equivalent. -/
def equivOfIsEmpty (α β : Sort*) [IsEmpty α] [IsEmpty β] : α ≃ β :=
⟨isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim⟩
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `Empty` type. -/
def equivEmpty (α : Sort u) [IsEmpty α] : α ≃ Empty := equivOfIsEmpty α _
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `PEmpty` type in any universe. -/
def equivPEmpty (α : Sort v) [IsEmpty α] : α ≃ PEmpty.{u} := equivOfIsEmpty α _
/-- `α` is equivalent to an empty type iff `α` is empty. -/
def equivEmptyEquiv (α : Sort u) : α ≃ Empty ≃ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e => Function.isEmpty e, @equivEmpty α, fun e => ext fun x => (e x).elim, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- The `Sort` of proofs of a false proposition is equivalent to `PEmpty`. -/
def propEquivPEmpty {p : Prop} (h : ¬p) : p ≃ PEmpty := @equivPEmpty p <| IsEmpty.prop_iff.2 h
/-- If both `α` and `β` have a unique element, then `α ≃ β`. -/
def ofUnique (α β : Sort _) [Unique.{u} α] [Unique.{v} β] : α ≃ β where
toFun := default
invFun := default
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-26")] alias equivOfUnique := ofUnique
/-- If `α` has a unique element, then it is equivalent to any `PUnit`. -/
def equivPUnit (α : Sort u) [Unique α] : α ≃ PUnit.{v} := ofUnique α _
/-- The `Sort` of proofs of a true proposition is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def propEquivPUnit {p : Prop} (h : p) : p ≃ PUnit.{0} := @equivPUnit p <| uniqueProp h
/-- `ULift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
protected def ulift {α : Type v} : ULift.{u} α ≃ α :=
⟨ULift.down, ULift.up, ULift.up_down, ULift.down_up.{v, u}⟩
/-- `PLift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
protected def plift : PLift α ≃ α := ⟨PLift.down, PLift.up, PLift.up_down, PLift.down_up⟩
/-- equivalence of propositions is the same as iff -/
def ofIff {P Q : Prop} (h : P ↔ Q) : P ≃ Q := ⟨h.mp, h.mpr, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- If `α₁` is equivalent to `α₂` and `β₁` is equivalent to `β₂`, then the type of maps `α₁ → β₁`
is equivalent to the type of maps `α₂ → β₂`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : (α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) where
toFun f := e₂ ∘ f ∘ e₁.symm
invFun f := e₂.symm ∘ f ∘ e₁
left_inv f := funext fun x => by simp only [comp_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := funext fun x => by simp only [comp_apply, apply_symm_apply]
theorem arrowCongr_comp {α₁ β₁ γ₁ α₂ β₂ γ₂ : Sort*} (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) (ec : γ₁ ≃ γ₂)
(f : α₁ → β₁) (g : β₁ → γ₁) :
arrowCongr ea ec (g ∘ f) = arrowCongr eb ec g ∘ arrowCongr ea eb f := by
ext; simp only [comp, arrowCongr_apply, eb.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_refl {α β : Sort*} :
arrowCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_trans {α₁ α₂ α₃ β₁ β₂ β₃ : Sort*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_symm {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(arrowCongr e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm := rfl
/-- A version of `Equiv.arrowCongr` in `Type`, rather than `Sort`.
The `equiv_rw` tactic is not able to use the default `Sort` level `Equiv.arrowCongr`,
because Lean's universe rules will not unify `?l_1` with `imax (1 ?m_1)`.
-/
@[simps! apply]
def arrowCongr' {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (hα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (hβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : (α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) :=
Equiv.arrowCongr hα hβ
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr'_refl {α β : Type*} :
arrowCongr' (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr'_trans {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ α₃ β₃ : Type*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
| arrowCongr' (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr' e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr' e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean | 464 | 466 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jake Levinson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jake Levinson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Basic
/-!
# Young diagrams
A Young diagram is a finite set of up-left justified boxes:
```text
□□□□□
□□□
□□□
□
```
This Young diagram corresponds to the [5, 3, 3, 1] partition of 12.
We represent it as a lower set in `ℕ × ℕ` in the product partial order. We write `(i, j) ∈ μ`
to say that `(i, j)` (in matrix coordinates) is in the Young diagram `μ`.
## Main definitions
- `YoungDiagram` : Young diagrams
- `YoungDiagram.card` : the number of cells in a Young diagram (its *cardinality*)
- `YoungDiagram.instDistribLatticeYoungDiagram` : a distributive lattice instance for Young diagrams
ordered by containment, with `(⊥ : YoungDiagram)` the empty diagram.
- `YoungDiagram.row` and `YoungDiagram.rowLen`: rows of a Young diagram and their lengths
- `YoungDiagram.col` and `YoungDiagram.colLen`: columns of a Young diagram and their lengths
## Notation
In "English notation", a Young diagram is drawn so that (i1, j1) ≤ (i2, j2)
means (i1, j1) is weakly up-and-left of (i2, j2). This terminology is used
below, e.g. in `YoungDiagram.up_left_mem`.
## Tags
Young diagram
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_tableau>
-/
open Function
/-- A Young diagram is a finite collection of cells on the `ℕ × ℕ` grid such that whenever
a cell is present, so are all the ones above and to the left of it. Like matrices, an `(i, j)` cell
is a cell in row `i` and column `j`, where rows are enumerated downward and columns rightward.
Young diagrams are modeled as finite sets in `ℕ × ℕ` that are lower sets with respect to the
standard order on products. -/
@[ext]
structure YoungDiagram where
/-- A finite set which represents a finite collection of cells on the `ℕ × ℕ` grid. -/
cells : Finset (ℕ × ℕ)
/-- Cells are up-left justified, witnessed by the fact that `cells` is a lower set in `ℕ × ℕ`. -/
isLowerSet : IsLowerSet (cells : Set (ℕ × ℕ))
namespace YoungDiagram
instance : SetLike YoungDiagram (ℕ × ℕ) where
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: figure out how to do this correctly
coe y := y.cells
coe_injective' μ ν h := by rwa [YoungDiagram.ext_iff, ← Finset.coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem mem_cells {μ : YoungDiagram} (c : ℕ × ℕ) : c ∈ μ.cells ↔ c ∈ μ :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk (c : ℕ × ℕ) (cells) (isLowerSet) :
c ∈ YoungDiagram.mk cells isLowerSet ↔ c ∈ cells :=
Iff.rfl
instance decidableMem (μ : YoungDiagram) : DecidablePred (· ∈ μ) :=
inferInstanceAs (DecidablePred (· ∈ μ.cells))
/-- In "English notation", a Young diagram is drawn so that (i1, j1) ≤ (i2, j2)
means (i1, j1) is weakly up-and-left of (i2, j2). -/
theorem up_left_mem (μ : YoungDiagram) {i1 i2 j1 j2 : ℕ} (hi : i1 ≤ i2) (hj : j1 ≤ j2)
(hcell : (i2, j2) ∈ μ) : (i1, j1) ∈ μ :=
μ.isLowerSet (Prod.mk_le_mk.mpr ⟨hi, hj⟩) hcell
section DistribLattice
@[simp]
theorem cells_subset_iff {μ ν : YoungDiagram} : μ.cells ⊆ ν.cells ↔ μ ≤ ν :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cells_ssubset_iff {μ ν : YoungDiagram} : μ.cells ⊂ ν.cells ↔ μ < ν :=
Iff.rfl
instance : Max YoungDiagram where
max μ ν :=
{ cells := μ.cells ∪ ν.cells
isLowerSet := by
rw [Finset.coe_union]
exact μ.isLowerSet.union ν.isLowerSet }
@[simp]
theorem cells_sup (μ ν : YoungDiagram) : (μ ⊔ ν).cells = μ.cells ∪ ν.cells :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (μ ν : YoungDiagram) : ↑(μ ⊔ ν) = (μ ∪ ν : Set (ℕ × ℕ)) :=
Finset.coe_union _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {μ ν : YoungDiagram} {x : ℕ × ℕ} : x ∈ μ ⊔ ν ↔ x ∈ μ ∨ x ∈ ν :=
Finset.mem_union
instance : Min YoungDiagram where
min μ ν :=
{ cells := μ.cells ∩ ν.cells
isLowerSet := by
rw [Finset.coe_inter]
exact μ.isLowerSet.inter ν.isLowerSet }
@[simp]
theorem cells_inf (μ ν : YoungDiagram) : (μ ⊓ ν).cells = μ.cells ∩ ν.cells :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (μ ν : YoungDiagram) : ↑(μ ⊓ ν) = (μ ∩ ν : Set (ℕ × ℕ)) :=
Finset.coe_inter _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {μ ν : YoungDiagram} {x : ℕ × ℕ} : x ∈ μ ⊓ ν ↔ x ∈ μ ∧ x ∈ ν :=
Finset.mem_inter
/-- The empty Young diagram is (⊥ : young_diagram). -/
instance : OrderBot YoungDiagram where
bot :=
{ cells := ∅
isLowerSet := by
intros a b _ h
simp only [Finset.coe_empty, Set.mem_empty_iff_false]
simp only [Finset.coe_empty, Set.mem_empty_iff_false] at h }
bot_le _ _ := by
intro y
simp only [mem_mk, Finset.not_mem_empty] at y
@[simp]
theorem cells_bot : (⊥ : YoungDiagram).cells = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot (x : ℕ × ℕ) : x ∉ (⊥ : YoungDiagram) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty x
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : (⊥ : YoungDiagram) = (∅ : Set (ℕ × ℕ)) := by
ext; simp
instance : Inhabited YoungDiagram :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance : DistribLattice YoungDiagram :=
Function.Injective.distribLattice YoungDiagram.cells (fun μ ν h => by rwa [YoungDiagram.ext_iff])
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
end DistribLattice
/-- Cardinality of a Young diagram -/
protected abbrev card (μ : YoungDiagram) : ℕ :=
μ.cells.card
section Transpose
/-- The `transpose` of a Young diagram is obtained by swapping i's with j's. -/
def transpose (μ : YoungDiagram) : YoungDiagram where
cells := (Equiv.prodComm _ _).finsetCongr μ.cells
isLowerSet _ _ h := by
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Equiv.finsetCongr_apply, Finset.mem_map_equiv]
intro hcell
apply μ.isLowerSet _ hcell
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_transpose {μ : YoungDiagram} {c : ℕ × ℕ} : c ∈ μ.transpose ↔ c.swap ∈ μ := by
simp [transpose]
@[simp]
theorem transpose_transpose (μ : YoungDiagram) : μ.transpose.transpose = μ := by
ext x
simp
theorem transpose_eq_iff_eq_transpose {μ ν : YoungDiagram} : μ.transpose = ν ↔ μ = ν.transpose := by
constructor <;>
· rintro rfl
simp
@[simp]
theorem transpose_eq_iff {μ ν : YoungDiagram} : μ.transpose = ν.transpose ↔ μ = ν := by
rw [transpose_eq_iff_eq_transpose]
simp
-- This is effectively both directions of `transpose_le_iff` below.
protected theorem le_of_transpose_le {μ ν : YoungDiagram} (h_le : μ.transpose ≤ ν) :
μ ≤ ν.transpose := fun c hc => by
simp only [mem_cells, mem_transpose]
apply h_le
simpa
@[simp]
theorem transpose_le_iff {μ ν : YoungDiagram} : μ.transpose ≤ ν.transpose ↔ μ ≤ ν :=
⟨fun h => by
convert YoungDiagram.le_of_transpose_le h
simp, fun h => by
rw [← transpose_transpose μ] at h
exact YoungDiagram.le_of_transpose_le h ⟩
@[mono]
protected theorem transpose_mono {μ ν : YoungDiagram} (h_le : μ ≤ ν) : μ.transpose ≤ ν.transpose :=
transpose_le_iff.mpr h_le
/-- Transposing Young diagrams is an `OrderIso`. -/
@[simps]
def transposeOrderIso : YoungDiagram ≃o YoungDiagram :=
⟨⟨transpose, transpose, fun _ => by simp, fun _ => by simp⟩, by simp⟩
end Transpose
section Rows
/-! ### Rows and row lengths of Young diagrams.
This section defines `μ.row` and `μ.rowLen`, with the following API:
1. `(i, j) ∈ μ ↔ j < μ.rowLen i`
2. `μ.row i = {i} ×ˢ (Finset.range (μ.rowLen i))`
3. `μ.rowLen i = (μ.row i).card`
4. `∀ {i1 i2}, i1 ≤ i2 → μ.rowLen i2 ≤ μ.rowLen i1`
Note: #3 is not convenient for defining `μ.rowLen`; instead, `μ.rowLen` is defined
as the smallest `j` such that `(i, j) ∉ μ`. -/
/-- The `i`-th row of a Young diagram consists of the cells whose first coordinate is `i`. -/
def row (μ : YoungDiagram) (i : ℕ) : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
μ.cells.filter fun c => c.fst = i
theorem mem_row_iff {μ : YoungDiagram} {i : ℕ} {c : ℕ × ℕ} : c ∈ μ.row i ↔ c ∈ μ ∧ c.fst = i := by
simp [row]
theorem mk_mem_row_iff {μ : YoungDiagram} {i j : ℕ} : (i, j) ∈ μ.row i ↔ (i, j) ∈ μ := by simp [row]
protected theorem exists_not_mem_row (μ : YoungDiagram) (i : ℕ) : ∃ j, (i, j) ∉ μ := by
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ :=
Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset
(μ.cells.preimage (Prod.mk i) fun _ _ _ _ h => by
cases h
rfl)
rw [Finset.mem_preimage] at hj
exact ⟨j, hj⟩
/-- Length of a row of a Young diagram -/
def rowLen (μ : YoungDiagram) (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
Nat.find <| μ.exists_not_mem_row i
theorem mem_iff_lt_rowLen {μ : YoungDiagram} {i j : ℕ} : (i, j) ∈ μ ↔ j < μ.rowLen i := by
rw [rowLen, Nat.lt_find_iff]
push_neg
exact ⟨fun h _ hmj => μ.up_left_mem (by rfl) hmj h, fun h => h _ (by rfl)⟩
theorem row_eq_prod {μ : YoungDiagram} {i : ℕ} : μ.row i = {i} ×ˢ Finset.range (μ.rowLen i) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_product, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_range, mem_row_iff,
mem_iff_lt_rowLen, and_comm, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro rfl
rfl
theorem rowLen_eq_card (μ : YoungDiagram) {i : ℕ} : μ.rowLen i = (μ.row i).card := by
simp [row_eq_prod]
@[mono]
theorem rowLen_anti (μ : YoungDiagram) (i1 i2 : ℕ) (hi : i1 ≤ i2) : μ.rowLen i2 ≤ μ.rowLen i1 := by
by_contra! h_lt
rw [← lt_self_iff_false (μ.rowLen i1)]
| rw [← mem_iff_lt_rowLen] at h_lt ⊢
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Young/YoungDiagram.lean | 289 | 289 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
dsimp only [zero]
subsingleton
instance [HasZeroObject V] : HasZeroObject (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨⟨zero, isZero_zero⟩⟩
noncomputable instance [HasZeroObject V] : Inhabited (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨zero⟩
theorem congr_hom {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} {f g : C ⟶ D} (w : f = g) (i : ι) :
f.f i = g.f i :=
congr_fun (congr_arg Hom.f w) i
lemma mono_of_mono_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)) : Mono φ where
right_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_mono (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
lemma epi_of_epi_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Epi (φ.f i)) : Epi φ where
left_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_epi (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
section
variable (V c)
/-- The functor picking out the `i`-th object of a complex. -/
@[simps]
def eval (i : ι) : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ V where
obj C := C.X i
map f := f.f i
instance (i : ι) : (eval V c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
/-- The functor forgetting the differential in a complex, obtaining a graded object. -/
@[simps]
def forget : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ GradedObject ι V where
obj C := C.X
map f := f.f
instance : (forget V c).Faithful where
map_injective h := by
ext i
exact congr_fun h i
/-- Forgetting the differentials than picking out the `i`-th object is the same as
just picking out the `i`-th object. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetEval (i : ι) : forget V c ⋙ GradedObject.eval i ≅ eval V c i :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
end
noncomputable section
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ φ.f n' := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n' ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ φ.f n := by subst h; simp
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i j'` are both allowed, then we must have `j = j'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem d_comp_eqToHom {i j j' : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i j') :
C.d i j' ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.next_eq rij' rij)) = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i' j` are both allowed, then we must have `i = i'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem eqToHom_comp_d {i i' j : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i' j) :
eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.prev_eq rij rij')) ≫ C.d i' j = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
theorem kernel_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j j' : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) (r' : c.Rel i j') :
kernelSubobject (C.d i j) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j') := by
rw [← d_comp_eqToHom C r r']
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i i' j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j)
(r' : c.Rel i' j) : imageSubobject (C.d i j) = imageSubobject (C.d i' j) := by
rw [← eqToHom_comp_d C r r']
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
section
/-- Either `C.X i`, if there is some `i` with `c.Rel i j`, or `C.X j`. -/
abbrev xPrev (j : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.prev j)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xPrevIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.prev_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `i` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xPrevIsoSelf {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.prev]
rw [dif_neg]
push_neg; intro i hi
have : c.prev j = i := c.prev_eq' hi
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- Either `C.X j`, if there is some `j` with `c.rel i j`, or `C.X i`. -/
abbrev xNext (i : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.next i)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.next_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `j` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.next]
rw [dif_neg]; rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
have : c.next i = j := c.next_eq' hj
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- The differential mapping into `C.X j`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dTo (j : ι) : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j :=
C.d (c.prev j) j
/-- The differential mapping out of `C.X i`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dFrom (i : ι) : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i :=
C.d i (c.next i)
theorem dTo_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dTo j = (C.xPrevIso r).hom ≫ C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' r
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dTo_eq_zero {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.dTo j = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
theorem dFrom_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dFrom i = C.d i j ≫ (C.xNextIso r).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' r
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dFrom_eq_zero {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.dFrom i = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIso_comp_dTo {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : (C.xPrevIso r).inv ≫ C.dTo j = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dTo_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIsoSelf_comp_dTo {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) :
(C.xPrevIsoSelf h).inv ≫ C.dTo j = 0 := by simp [h]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIso r).hom = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dFrom_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIsoSelf h).hom = 0 := by simp [h]
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem dTo_comp_dFrom (j : ι) : C.dTo j ≫ C.dFrom j = 0 :=
C.d_comp_d _ _ _
theorem kernel_from_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
kernelSubobject (C.dFrom i) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dFrom_eq r]
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_to_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
imageSubobject (C.dTo j) = imageSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dTo_eq r]
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
end
namespace Hom
variable {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c}
/-- The `i`-th component of an isomorphism of chain complexes. -/
@[simps!]
def isoApp (f : C₁ ≅ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i :=
(eval V c i).mapIso f
/-- Construct an isomorphism of chain complexes from isomorphism of the objects
which commute with the differentials. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfComponents (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom := by aesop_cat) :
C₁ ≅ C₂ where
hom :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).hom
comm' := hf }
inv :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).inv
comm' := fun i j hij =>
calc
(f i).inv ≫ C₁.d i j = (f i).inv ≫ (C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) ≫ (f j).inv := by simp
_ = (f i).inv ≫ ((f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j) ≫ (f j).inv := by rw [hf i j hij]
_ = C₂.d i j ≫ (f j).inv := by simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem isoOfComponents_app (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) (i : ι) :
isoApp (isoOfComponents f hf) i = f i := by
ext
simp
theorem isIso_of_components (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) [∀ n : ι, IsIso (f.f n)] : IsIso f :=
(HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents fun n => asIso (f.f n)).isIso_hom
/-! Lemmas relating chain maps and `dTo`/`dFrom`. -/
/-- `f.prev j` is `f.f i` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev prev (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : C₁.xPrev j ⟶ C₂.xPrev j :=
f.f _
theorem prev_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.prev j = (C₁.xPrevIso w).hom ≫ f.f i ≫ (C₂.xPrevIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
simp only [xPrevIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
/-- `f.next i` is `f.f j` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev next (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.xNext i ⟶ C₂.xNext i :=
f.f _
theorem next_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.next i = (C₁.xNextIso w).hom ≫ f.f j ≫ (C₂.xNextIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
simp only [xNextIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc, elementwise]
theorem comm_from (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : f.f i ≫ C₂.dFrom i = C₁.dFrom i ≫ f.next i :=
f.comm _ _
attribute [simp] comm_from_apply
@[reassoc, elementwise]
theorem comm_to (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : f.prev j ≫ C₂.dTo j = C₁.dTo j ≫ f.f j :=
f.comm _ _
attribute [simp] comm_to_apply
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials out of each object.
-/
def sqFrom (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dFrom i) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dFrom i) :=
Arrow.homMk _ _ (f.comm_from i)
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).left = f.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).right = f.next i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_id (C₁ : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : sqFrom (𝟙 C₁) i = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_comp (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
sqFrom (f ≫ g) i = sqFrom f i ≫ sqFrom g i :=
rfl
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials into each object.
-/
def sqTo (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dTo j) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dTo j) :=
Arrow.homMk _ _ (f.comm_to j)
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).left = f.prev j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).right = f.f j :=
rfl
end Hom
end
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
section Of
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
/-- Construct an `α`-indexed chain complex from a dependently-typed differential.
-/
def of (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0) : ChainComplex V α :=
{ X := X
d := fun i j => if h : i = j + 1 then eqToHom (by rw [h]) ≫ d j else 0
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp
rw [dif_neg (Ne.symm w)]
d_comp_d' := fun i j k hij hjk => by
dsimp at hij hjk
substs hij hjk
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, sq] }
variable (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0)
@[simp]
theorem of_x (n : α) : (of X d sq).X n = X n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_d (j : α) : (of X d sq).d (j + 1) j = d j := by
dsimp [of]
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
theorem of_d_ne {i j : α} (h : i ≠ j + 1) : (of X d sq).d i j = 0 := by
dsimp [of]
rw [dif_neg h]
end Of
section OfHom
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
variable (X : α → V) (d_X : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq_X : ∀ n, d_X (n + 1) ≫ d_X n = 0) (Y : α → V)
(d_Y : ∀ n, Y (n + 1) ⟶ Y n) (sq_Y : ∀ n, d_Y (n + 1) ≫ d_Y n = 0)
/-- A constructor for chain maps between `α`-indexed chain complexes built using `ChainComplex.of`,
from a dependently typed collection of morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : ∀ i : α, X i ⟶ Y i) (comm : ∀ i : α, f (i + 1) ≫ d_Y i = d_X i ≫ f i) :
of X d_X sq_X ⟶ of Y d_Y sq_Y :=
{ f
comm' := fun n m => by
by_cases h : n = m + 1
· subst h
simpa using comm m
· rw [of_d_ne X _ _ h, of_d_ne Y _ _ h]
simp }
end OfHom
section Mk
variable {V}
variable (X₀ X₁ X₂ : V) (d₀ : X₁ ⟶ X₀) (d₁ : X₂ ⟶ X₁) (s : d₁ ≫ d₀ = 0)
(succ : ∀ (S : ShortComplex V), Σ' (X₃ : V) (d₂ : X₃ ⟶ S.X₁), d₂ ≫ S.f = 0)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mk`. -/
def mkAux : ℕ → ShortComplex V
| 0 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ s
| n + 1 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ (succ (mkAux n)).2.2
/-- An inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first two differentials,
then a function which takes two differentials and the fact they compose to zero,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
See also `mk'`, which only sees the previous differential in the inductive step.
-/
def mk : ChainComplex V ℕ :=
of (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).X₃) (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).g)
fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_2 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 2 = X₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_1_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 1 0 = d₀ := by
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (𝟙 X₁ ≫ d₀) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_2_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 2 1 = d₁ := by
change ite (2 = 1 + 1) (𝟙 X₂ ≫ d₁) 0 = d₁
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
-- TODO simp lemmas for the inductive steps? It's not entirely clear that they are needed.
/-- A simpler inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first differential,
then a function which takes a differential,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
-/
def mk' (X₀ X₁ : V) (d : X₁ ⟶ X₀)
(succ' : ∀ {X₀ X₁ : V} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₀), Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : X₂ ⟶ X₁), d ≫ f = 0) :
ChainComplex V ℕ :=
mk _ _ _ _ _ (succ' d).2.2 (fun S => succ' S.f)
variable (succ' : ∀ {X₀ X₁ : V} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₀), Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : X₂ ⟶ X₁), d ≫ f = 0)
@[simp]
theorem mk'_X_0 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_X_1 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_d_1_0 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').d 1 0 = d₀ := by
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (𝟙 X₁ ≫ d₀) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
/- Porting note:
Downstream constructions using `mk'` (e.g. in `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Projective`)
have very slow proofs, because of bad simp lemmas.
It would be better to write good lemmas here if possible, such as
```
theorem mk'_X_succ (j : ℕ) :
(mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').X (j + 2) = (succ' ⟨_, _, (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').d (j + 1) j⟩).1 := by
sorry
theorem mk'_d_succ {i j : ℕ} :
(mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').d (j + 2) (j + 1) =
eqToHom (mk'_X_succ X₀ X₁ d₀ succ' j) ≫
(succ' ⟨_, _, (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').d (j + 1) j⟩).2.1 :=
sorry
```
These are already tricky, and it may be better to write analogous lemmas for `mk` first.
-/
end Mk
section MkHom
variable {V}
variable (P Q : ChainComplex V ℕ) (zero : P.X 0 ⟶ Q.X 0) (one : P.X 1 ⟶ Q.X 1)
(one_zero_comm : one ≫ Q.d 1 0 = P.d 1 0 ≫ zero)
(succ :
∀ (n : ℕ)
(p :
Σ' (f : P.X n ⟶ Q.X n) (f' : P.X (n + 1) ⟶ Q.X (n + 1)),
f' ≫ Q.d (n + 1) n = P.d (n + 1) n ≫ f),
Σ' f'' : P.X (n + 2) ⟶ Q.X (n + 2), f'' ≫ Q.d (n + 2) (n + 1) = P.d (n + 2) (n + 1) ≫ p.2.1)
/-- An auxiliary construction for `mkHom`.
Here we build by induction a family of commutative squares,
but don't require at the type level that these successive commutative squares actually agree.
They do in fact agree, and we then capture that at the type level (i.e. by constructing a chain map)
in `mkHom`.
-/
def mkHomAux :
∀ n,
Σ' (f : P.X n ⟶ Q.X n) (f' : P.X (n + 1) ⟶ Q.X (n + 1)),
f' ≫ Q.d (n + 1) n = P.d (n + 1) n ≫ f
| 0 => ⟨zero, one, one_zero_comm⟩
| n + 1 => ⟨(mkHomAux n).2.1, (succ n (mkHomAux n)).1, (succ n (mkHomAux n)).2⟩
/-- A constructor for chain maps between `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes,
working by induction on commutative squares.
You need to provide the components of the chain map in degrees 0 and 1,
show that these form a commutative square,
and then give a construction of each component,
and the fact that it forms a commutative square with the previous component,
using as an inductive hypothesis the data (and commutativity) of the previous two components.
-/
def mkHom : P ⟶ Q where
f n := (mkHomAux P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ n).1
comm' n m := by
rintro (rfl : m + 1 = n)
exact (mkHomAux P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ m).2.2
@[simp]
theorem mkHom_f_0 : (mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).f 0 = zero :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkHom_f_1 : (mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).f 1 = one :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkHom_f_succ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).f (n + 2) =
(succ n
⟨(mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).f n,
(mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).f (n + 1),
(mkHom P Q zero one one_zero_comm succ).comm (n + 1) n⟩).1 := by
dsimp [mkHom, mkHomAux]
end MkHom
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
section Of
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
/-- Construct an `α`-indexed cochain complex from a dependently-typed differential.
-/
def of (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X n ⟶ X (n + 1)) (sq : ∀ n, d n ≫ d (n + 1) = 0) :
CochainComplex V α :=
{ X := X
d := fun i j => if h : i + 1 = j then d _ ≫ eqToHom (by rw [h]) else 0
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp
rw [dif_neg]
exact w
d_comp_d' := fun i j k => by
dsimp
split_ifs with h h' h'
· substs h h'
simp [sq]
all_goals simp }
variable (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X n ⟶ X (n + 1)) (sq : ∀ n, d n ≫ d (n + 1) = 0)
@[simp]
theorem of_x (n : α) : (of X d sq).X n = X n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_d (j : α) : (of X d sq).d j (j + 1) = d j := by
dsimp [of]
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.comp_id]
theorem of_d_ne {i j : α} (h : i + 1 ≠ j) : (of X d sq).d i j = 0 := by
dsimp [of]
rw [dif_neg h]
end Of
section OfHom
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
variable (X : α → V) (d_X : ∀ n, X n ⟶ X (n + 1)) (sq_X : ∀ n, d_X n ≫ d_X (n + 1) = 0) (Y : α → V)
(d_Y : ∀ n, Y n ⟶ Y (n + 1)) (sq_Y : ∀ n, d_Y n ≫ d_Y (n + 1) = 0)
/--
A constructor for chain maps between `α`-indexed cochain complexes built using `CochainComplex.of`,
from a dependently typed collection of morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : ∀ i : α, X i ⟶ Y i) (comm : ∀ i : α, f i ≫ d_Y i = d_X i ≫ f (i + 1)) :
of X d_X sq_X ⟶ of Y d_Y sq_Y :=
{ f
comm' := fun n m => by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· subst h
simpa using comm n
· rw [of_d_ne X _ _ h, of_d_ne Y _ _ h]
simp }
end OfHom
section Mk
variable {V}
variable (X₀ X₁ X₂ : V) (d₀ : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (d₁ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (s : d₀ ≫ d₁ = 0)
(succ : ∀ (S : ShortComplex V), Σ' (X₄ : V) (d₂ : S.X₃ ⟶ X₄), S.g ≫ d₂ = 0)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mk`. -/
def mkAux : ℕ → ShortComplex V
| 0 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ s
| n + 1 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ (succ (mkAux n)).2.2
/-- An inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed cochain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first two differentials,
then a function which takes two differentials and the fact they compose to zero,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
See also `mk'`, which only sees the previous differential in the inductive step.
-/
def mk : CochainComplex V ℕ :=
of (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).X₁) (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).f)
fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_2 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 2 = X₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_1_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 0 1 = d₀ := by
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (d₀ ≫ 𝟙 X₁) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_2_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 1 2 = d₁ := by
change ite (2 = 1 + 1) (d₁ ≫ 𝟙 X₂) 0 = d₁
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.comp_id]
-- TODO simp lemmas for the inductive steps? It's not entirely clear that they are needed.
/-- A simpler inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed cochain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first differential,
then a function which takes a differential,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
-/
def mk' (X₀ X₁ : V) (d : X₀ ⟶ X₁)
-- (succ' : ∀ : ΣX₀ X₁ : V, X₀ ⟶ X₁, Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : t.2.1 ⟶ X₂), t.2.2 ≫ d = 0) :
(succ' : ∀ {X₀ X₁ : V} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁), Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : X₁ ⟶ X₂), f ≫ d = 0) :
CochainComplex V ℕ :=
mk _ _ _ _ _ (succ' d).2.2 (fun S => succ' S.g)
variable (succ' : ∀ {X₀ X₁ : V} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁), Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : X₁ ⟶ X₂), f ≫ d = 0)
@[simp]
theorem mk'_X_0 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_X_1 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_d_1_0 : (mk' X₀ X₁ d₀ succ').d 0 1 = d₀ := by
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (d₀ ≫ 𝟙 X₁) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.comp_id]
-- TODO simp lemmas for the inductive steps? It's not entirely clear that they are needed.
end Mk
section MkHom
variable {V}
| variable (P Q : CochainComplex V ℕ) (zero : P.X 0 ⟶ Q.X 0) (one : P.X 1 ⟶ Q.X 1)
(one_zero_comm : zero ≫ Q.d 0 1 = P.d 0 1 ≫ one)
(succ : ∀ (n : ℕ) (p : Σ' (f : P.X n ⟶ Q.X n) (f' : P.X (n + 1) ⟶ Q.X (n + 1)),
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 965 | 967 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
end AddZeroClass
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instNatSMul : SMul ℕ (α →₀ M) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (nsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
end AddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid M] : AddCommMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid
DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add (fun _ _ => rfl)
instance instNeg [NegZeroClass G] : Neg (α →₀ G) :=
⟨mapRange Neg.neg neg_zero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
theorem neg_apply [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (-g) a = -g a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_neg [NegZeroClass G] [NegZeroClass H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (v : α →₀ G) : mapRange f hf (-v) = -mapRange f hf v :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', neg_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_neg' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (-v) = -mapRange f (map_zero f) v :=
mapRange_neg (map_neg f) v
instance instSub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] : Sub (α →₀ G) :=
⟨zipWith Sub.sub (sub_zero _)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ := rfl
theorem sub_apply [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (g₁ - g₂) a = g₁ a - g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] [SubNegZeroMonoid H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ - mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', sub_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_sub' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ - mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_sub (map_sub f) v₁ v₂
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instIntSMul [AddGroup G] : SMul ℤ (α →₀ G) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (zsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup G] : AddGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup G] : AddCommGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_neg [AddGroup G] (f : α →₀ G) : support (-f) = support f :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm support_mapRange
(calc
support f = support (- -f) := congr_arg support (neg_neg _).symm
_ ⊆ support (-f) := support_mapRange
)
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq α] [AddGroup G] {f g : α →₀ G} :
support (f - g) ⊆ support f ∪ support g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← support_neg g]
exact support_add
end Finsupp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 668 | 671 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ToNat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Finite Cardinality Functions
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`.
* `ENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `ENat.card α = ⊤`.
* `PartENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number
(using the legacy definition `PartENat := Part ℕ`). If `α` is infinite, `PartENat.card α = ⊤`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Cardinal Function
noncomputable section
variable {α β : Type*}
universe u v
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`. -/
protected def card (α : Type*) : ℕ :=
toNat (mk α)
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_fintype_card [Fintype α] : Nat.card α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card
/-- Because this theorem takes `Fintype α` as a non-instance argument, it can be used in particular
when `Fintype.card` ends up with different instance than the one found by inference -/
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_eq_nat_card {_ : Fintype α} : Fintype.card α = Nat.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card.symm
lemma card_eq_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : Nat.card s = s.card := by
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
lemma card_eq_card_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Nat.card s = s.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, s.mem_toFinset]
lemma card_eq_card_finite_toFinset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card s = hs.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, hs.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem card_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Nat.card α = 0 := by simp [Nat.card]
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite α] : Nat.card α = 0 := mk_toNat_of_infinite
lemma cast_card [Finite α] : (Nat.card α : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk α := by
rw [Nat.card, Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0]
exact Cardinal.lt_aleph0_of_finite _
| lemma _root_.Set.Infinite.card_eq_zero {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : Nat.card s = 0 :=
@card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Finite.lean | 67 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
| @[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 69 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Over
/-!
# Restriction of Schemes and Morphisms
## Main definition
- `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrict`: The restriction of a scheme along an open embedding.
The map `X.restrict f ⟶ X` is `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.ofRestrict`.
`U : X.Opens` has a coercion to `Scheme` and `U.ι` is a shorthand
for `X.restrict U.open_embedding : U ⟶ X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.morphism_restrict`: The restriction of `X ⟶ Y` to `X ∣_ᵤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U ⟶ Y ∣_ᵤ U`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe v v₁ v₂ u u₁
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens)
namespace Scheme.Opens
/-- Open subset of a scheme as a scheme. -/
@[coe]
def toScheme {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) : Scheme.{u} :=
X.restrict U.isOpenEmbedding
instance : CoeOut X.Opens Scheme := ⟨toScheme⟩
/-- The restriction of a scheme to an open subset. -/
def ι : ↑U ⟶ X := X.ofRestrict _
@[simp]
lemma ι_base_apply (x : U) : U.ι.base x = x.val := rfl
instance : IsOpenImmersion U.ι := inferInstanceAs (IsOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict _))
@[simps! over] instance : U.toScheme.CanonicallyOver X where
hom := U.ι
instance (U : X.Opens) : U.ι.IsOver X where
lemma toScheme_carrier : (U : Type u) = (U : Set X) := rfl
lemma toScheme_presheaf_obj (V) : Γ(U, V) = Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ V) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toScheme_presheaf_map {V W} (i : V ⟶ W) :
U.toScheme.presheaf.map i = X.presheaf.map (U.ι.opensFunctor.map i.unop).op := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ι_app (V) : U.ι.app V = X.presheaf.map
(homOfLE (x := U.ι ''ᵁ U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V) (Set.image_preimage_subset _ _)).op :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma ι_appTop :
U.ι.appTop = X.presheaf.map (homOfLE (x := U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤) le_top).op :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma ι_appLE (V W e) :
U.ι.appLE V W e =
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE (x := U.ι ''ᵁ W) (Set.image_subset_iff.mpr ‹_›)).op := by
simp only [Hom.appLE, ι_app, Functor.op_obj, Opens.carrier_eq_coe, toScheme_presheaf_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Hom.opensFunctor_map_homOfLE, Opens.coe_inclusion', ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma ι_appIso (V) : U.ι.appIso V = Iso.refl _ :=
X.ofRestrict_appIso _ _
@[simp]
lemma opensRange_ι : U.ι.opensRange = U :=
Opens.ext Subtype.range_val
@[simp]
lemma range_ι : Set.range U.ι.base = U :=
Subtype.range_val
lemma ι_image_top : U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤ = U :=
U.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top
lemma ι_image_le (W : U.toScheme.Opens) : U.ι ''ᵁ W ≤ U := by
simp_rw [← U.ι_image_top]
exact U.ι.image_le_image_of_le le_top
@[simp]
lemma ι_preimage_self : U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ U = ⊤ :=
Opens.inclusion'_map_eq_top _
instance ι_appLE_isIso :
IsIso (U.ι.appLE U ⊤ U.ι_preimage_self.ge) := by
simp only [ι, ofRestrict_appLE]
show IsIso (X.presheaf.map (eqToIso U.ι_image_top).hom.op)
infer_instance
lemma ι_app_self : U.ι.app U = X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (X := U.ι ''ᵁ _) (by simp)).op := rfl
lemma eq_presheaf_map_eqToHom {V W : Opens U} (e : U.ι ''ᵁ V = U.ι ''ᵁ W) :
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom e).op =
U.toScheme.presheaf.map (eqToHom <| U.isOpenEmbedding.functor_obj_injective e).op := rfl
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_iff : Nonempty U.toScheme ↔ (U : Set X).Nonempty := by
simp only [toScheme_carrier, SetLike.coe_sort_coe, nonempty_subtype]
rfl
attribute [-simp] eqToHom_op in
/-- The global sections of the restriction is isomorphic to the sections on the open set. -/
@[simps!]
def topIso : Γ(U, ⊤) ≅ Γ(X, U) :=
X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso U.ι_image_top.symm).op
/-- The stalks of an open subscheme are isomorphic to the stalks of the original scheme. -/
def stalkIso {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) (x : U) :
U.toScheme.presheaf.stalk x ≅ X.presheaf.stalk x.1 :=
X.restrictStalkIso (Opens.isOpenEmbedding _) _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germ_stalkIso_hom {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens)
{V : U.toScheme.Opens} (x : U) (hx : x ∈ V) :
U.toScheme.presheaf.germ V x hx ≫ (U.stalkIso x).hom =
X.presheaf.germ (U.ι ''ᵁ V) x.1 ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
PresheafedSpace.restrictStalkIso_hom_eq_germ _ U.isOpenEmbedding _ _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma germ_stalkIso_inv {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) (V : U.toScheme.Opens) (x : U)
(hx : x ∈ V) : X.presheaf.germ (U.ι ''ᵁ V) x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ≫
(U.stalkIso x).inv = U.toScheme.presheaf.germ V x hx :=
PresheafedSpace.restrictStalkIso_inv_eq_germ X.toPresheafedSpace U.isOpenEmbedding V x hx
lemma stalkIso_inv {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) (x : U) :
(U.stalkIso x).inv = U.ι.stalkMap x := by
rw [← Category.comp_id (U.stalkIso x).inv, Iso.inv_comp_eq]
apply TopCat.Presheaf.stalk_hom_ext
intro W hxW
simp only [Category.comp_id, U.germ_stalkIso_hom_assoc]
convert (Scheme.stalkMap_germ U.ι (U.ι ''ᵁ W) x ⟨_, hxW, rfl⟩).symm
refine (U.toScheme.presheaf.germ_res (homOfLE ?_) _ _).symm
exact (Set.preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective).le
end Scheme.Opens
/-- If `U` is a family of open sets that covers `X`, then `X.restrict U` forms an `X.open_cover`. -/
@[simps! J obj map]
def Scheme.openCoverOfISupEqTop {s : Type*} (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : s → X.Opens)
(hU : ⨆ i, U i = ⊤) : X.OpenCover where
J := s
obj i := U i
map i := (U i).ι
f x :=
haveI : x ∈ ⨆ i, U i := hU.symm ▸ show x ∈ (⊤ : X.Opens) by trivial
(Opens.mem_iSup.mp this).choose
covers x := by
erw [Subtype.range_coe]
have : x ∈ ⨆ i, U i := hU.symm ▸ show x ∈ (⊤ : X.Opens) by trivial
exact (Opens.mem_iSup.mp this).choose_spec
/-- The open sets of an open subscheme corresponds to the open sets containing in the subset. -/
@[simps!]
def opensRestrict :
Scheme.Opens U ≃ { V : X.Opens // V ≤ U } :=
(IsOpenImmersion.opensEquiv (U.ι)).trans (Equiv.subtypeEquivProp (by simp))
instance ΓRestrictAlgebra {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
Algebra (Γ(X, ⊤)) Γ(U, ⊤) :=
U.ι.appTop.hom.toAlgebra
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen (r : Γ(U, ⊤)) :
U.ι ''ᵁ U.toScheme.basicOpen r = X.basicOpen
(X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op r) := by
refine (Scheme.image_basicOpen (X.ofRestrict U.isOpenEmbedding) r).trans ?_
rw [← Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq _ _ (eqToHom U.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top).op]
rw [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eqToHom_trans,
eqToHom_refl, op_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id]
congr
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-23")] alias Scheme.map_basicOpen' := Scheme.map_basicOpen
lemma Scheme.Opens.ι_image_basicOpen (r : Γ(U, ⊤)) :
U.ι ''ᵁ U.toScheme.basicOpen r = X.basicOpen r := by
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen, Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen_map (r : Γ(X, U)) :
U.ι ''ᵁ (U.toScheme.basicOpen <| U.topIso.inv r) = X.basicOpen r := by
simp only [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_obj]
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen, Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq, Scheme.Opens.topIso_inv,
Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq X]
/-- If `U ≤ V`, then `U` is also a subscheme of `V`. -/
protected noncomputable
def Scheme.homOfLE (X : Scheme.{u}) {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) : (U : Scheme.{u}) ⟶ V :=
IsOpenImmersion.lift V.ι U.ι (by simpa using e)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.homOfLE_ι (X : Scheme.{u}) {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) :
X.homOfLE e ≫ V.ι = U.ι :=
IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac _ _ _
instance {U V : X.Opens} (h : U ≤ V) : (X.homOfLE h).IsOver X where
@[simp]
lemma Scheme.homOfLE_rfl (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : X.Opens) : X.homOfLE (refl U) = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_mono U.ι, Scheme.homOfLE_ι, Category.id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.homOfLE_homOfLE (X : Scheme.{u}) {U V W : X.Opens} (e₁ : U ≤ V) (e₂ : V ≤ W) :
X.homOfLE e₁ ≫ X.homOfLE e₂ = X.homOfLE (e₁.trans e₂) := by
rw [← cancel_mono W.ι, Category.assoc, Scheme.homOfLE_ι, Scheme.homOfLE_ι, Scheme.homOfLE_ι]
theorem Scheme.homOfLE_base {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) :
(X.homOfLE e).base = (Opens.toTopCat _).map (homOfLE e) := by
ext a; refine Subtype.ext ?_ -- Porting note: `ext` did not pick up `Subtype.ext`
exact congr($(X.homOfLE_ι e).base a)
@[simp]
theorem Scheme.homOfLE_apply {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) (x : U) :
((X.homOfLE e).base x).1 = x := by
rw [homOfLE_base]
rfl
theorem Scheme.ι_image_homOfLE_le_ι_image {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) (W : Opens V) :
U.ι ''ᵁ (X.homOfLE e ⁻¹ᵁ W) ≤ V.ι ''ᵁ W := by
simp only [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, Set.image_subset_iff,
Scheme.homOfLE_base, Opens.map_coe, Opens.inclusion'_hom_apply]
rintro _ h
exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Scheme.homOfLE_app {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) (W : Opens V) :
(X.homOfLE e).app W =
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE <| X.ι_image_homOfLE_le_ι_image e W).op := by
have e₁ := Scheme.congr_app (X.homOfLE_ι e) (V.ι ''ᵁ W)
have : V.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V.ι ''ᵁ W = W := W.map_functor_eq (U := V)
have e₂ := (X.homOfLE e).naturality (eqToIso this).hom.op
have e₃ := e₂.symm.trans e₁
dsimp at e₃ ⊢
rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv, ← Functor.map_inv, ← Functor.map_comp] at e₃
rw [e₃, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr 1
theorem Scheme.homOfLE_appTop {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) :
(X.homOfLE e).appTop =
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE <| X.ι_image_homOfLE_le_ι_image e ⊤).op :=
homOfLE_app ..
instance (X : Scheme.{u}) {U V : X.Opens} (e : U ≤ V) : IsOpenImmersion (X.homOfLE e) := by
delta Scheme.homOfLE
infer_instance
variable (X) in
/-- The functor taking open subsets of `X` to open subschemes of `X`. -/
@[simps! obj_left obj_hom map_left]
def Scheme.restrictFunctor : X.Opens ⥤ Over X where
obj U := Over.mk U.ι
map {U V} i := Over.homMk (X.homOfLE i.le) (by simp)
map_id U := by
ext1
exact Scheme.homOfLE_rfl _ _
map_comp {U V W} i j := by
ext1
exact (X.homOfLE_homOfLE i.le j.le).symm
/-- The functor that restricts to open subschemes and then takes global section is
isomorphic to the structure sheaf. -/
@[simps!]
def Scheme.restrictFunctorΓ : X.restrictFunctor.op ⋙ (Over.forget X).op ⋙ Scheme.Γ ≅ X.presheaf :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun U => X.presheaf.mapIso ((eqToIso (unop U).isOpenEmbedding_obj_top).symm.op :))
(by
intro U V i
dsimp
rw [X.homOfLE_appTop, ← Functor.map_comp, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr 1)
/-- `X ∣_ U ∣_ V` is isomorphic to `X ∣_ V ∣_ U` -/
noncomputable
def Scheme.restrictRestrictComm (X : Scheme.{u}) (U V : X.Opens) :
(U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V).toScheme ≅ V.ι ⁻¹ᵁ U :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (Opens.ι _ ≫ U.ι) (Opens.ι _ ≫ V.ι) <| by
simp only [comp_coeBase, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp, Opens.range_ι, Opens.map_coe,
Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.inter_comm (U : Set X)]
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, then for any `U : X.Opens`,
we have the isomorphism `U ≅ f ''ᵁ U`. -/
noncomputable
def Scheme.Hom.isoImage
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] (U : X.Opens) :
U.toScheme ≅ f ''ᵁ U :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (Opens.ι _ ≫ f) (Opens.ι _) (by simp [Set.range_comp])
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Hom.isoImage_hom_ι
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] (U : X.Opens) :
(f.isoImage U).hom ≫ (f ''ᵁ U).ι = U.ι ≫ f :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_hom_fac _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Hom.isoImage_inv_ι
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] (U : X.Opens) :
(f.isoImage U).inv ≫ U.ι ≫ f = (f ''ᵁ U).ι :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac _ _ _
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, then `X` is isomorphic to its image in `Y`. -/
def Scheme.Hom.isoOpensRange {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
X ≅ f.opensRange :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq f f.opensRange.ι (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Hom.isoOpensRange_hom_ι {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
f.isoOpensRange.hom ≫ f.opensRange.ι = f := by
simp [isoOpensRange]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Hom.isoOpensRange_inv_comp {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
f.isoOpensRange.inv ≫ f = f.opensRange.ι := by
simp [isoOpensRange]
/-- `(⊤ : X.Opens)` as a scheme is isomorphic to `X`. -/
| @[simps hom]
def Scheme.topIso (X : Scheme) : ↑(⊤ : X.Opens) ≅ X where
hom := Scheme.Opens.ι _
inv := ⟨X.restrictTopIso.inv⟩
hom_inv_id := Hom.ext' X.restrictTopIso.hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := Hom.ext' X.restrictTopIso.inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.toIso_inv_ι (X : Scheme.{u}) : X.topIso.inv ≫ Opens.ι _ = 𝟙 _ :=
X.topIso.inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.ι_toIso_inv (X : Scheme.{u}) : Opens.ι _ ≫ X.topIso.inv = 𝟙 _ :=
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Restrict.lean | 341 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Exterior
/-!
# Alexandrov-discrete topological spaces
This file defines Alexandrov-discrete spaces, aka finitely generated spaces.
A space is Alexandrov-discrete if the (arbitrary) intersection of open sets is open. As such,
the intersection of all neighborhoods of a set is a neighborhood itself. Hence every set has a
minimal neighborhood, which we call the *exterior* of the set.
## Main declarations
* `AlexandrovDiscrete`: Prop-valued typeclass for a topological space to be Alexandrov-discrete
## Notes
The "minimal neighborhood of a set" construction is not named in the literature. We chose the name
"exterior" with analogy to the interior. `interior` and `exterior` have the same properties up to
## TODO
Finite product of Alexandrov-discrete spaces is Alexandrov-discrete.
## Tags
Alexandroff, discrete, finitely generated, fg space
-/
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
/-- A topological space is **Alexandrov-discrete** or **finitely generated** if the intersection of
a family of open sets is open. -/
class AlexandrovDiscrete (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The intersection of a family of open sets is an open set. Use `isOpen_sInter` in the root
namespace instead. -/
protected isOpen_sInter : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) → IsOpen (⋂₀ S)
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {α β : Type*}
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
instance DiscreteTopology.toAlexandrovDiscrete [DiscreteTopology α] : AlexandrovDiscrete α where
isOpen_sInter _ _ := isOpen_discrete _
instance Finite.toAlexandrovDiscrete [Finite α] : AlexandrovDiscrete α where
isOpen_sInter S := (toFinite S).isOpen_sInter
section AlexandrovDiscrete
variable [AlexandrovDiscrete α] {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α}
lemma isOpen_sInter : (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) → IsOpen (⋂₀ S) := AlexandrovDiscrete.isOpen_sInter _
lemma isOpen_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋂ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma isOpen_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsOpen (f i j)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, ⋂ j, f i j) :=
isOpen_iInter fun _ ↦ isOpen_iInter <| hf _
lemma isClosed_sUnion (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClosed s) : IsClosed (⋃₀ S) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sUnion] at hS ⊢; exact isOpen_sInter <| forall_mem_image.2 hS
lemma isClosed_iUnion (hf : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋃ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma isClosed_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClosed (f i j)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, ⋃ j, f i j) :=
isClosed_iUnion fun _ ↦ isClosed_iUnion <| hf _
lemma isClopen_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClopen s) : IsClopen (⋂₀ S) :=
⟨isClosed_sInter fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).1, isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsClopen (f i)) : IsClopen (⋂ i, f i) :=
⟨isClosed_iInter fun i ↦ (hf i).1, isOpen_iInter fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClopen (f i j)) :
IsClopen (⋂ i, ⋂ j, f i j) :=
isClopen_iInter fun _ ↦ isClopen_iInter <| hf _
lemma isClopen_sUnion (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClopen s) : IsClopen (⋃₀ S) :=
⟨isClosed_sUnion fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).1, isOpen_sUnion fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iUnion (hf : ∀ i, IsClopen (f i)) : IsClopen (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨isClosed_iUnion fun i ↦ (hf i).1, isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClopen (f i j)) :
IsClopen (⋃ i, ⋃ j, f i j) :=
isClopen_iUnion fun _ ↦ isClopen_iUnion <| hf _
lemma interior_iInter (f : ι → Set α) : interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) :=
(interior_maximal (iInter_mono fun _ ↦ interior_subset) <| isOpen_iInter fun _ ↦
isOpen_interior).antisymm' <| subset_iInter fun _ ↦ interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
lemma interior_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
simp_rw [sInter_eq_biInter, interior_iInter]
lemma closure_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) : closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) :=
compl_injective <| by
simpa only [← interior_compl, compl_iUnion] using interior_iInter fun i ↦ (f i)ᶜ
lemma closure_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, closure_iUnion]
end AlexandrovDiscrete
lemma Topology.IsInducing.alexandrovDiscrete [AlexandrovDiscrete α] {f : β → α} (h : IsInducing f) :
AlexandrovDiscrete β where
isOpen_sInter S hS := by
simp_rw [h.isOpen_iff] at hS ⊢
choose U hU htU using hS
refine ⟨_, isOpen_iInter₂ hU, ?_⟩
simp_rw [preimage_iInter, htU, sInter_eq_biInter]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.alexandrovDiscrete := IsInducing.alexandrovDiscrete
end
lemma AlexandrovDiscrete.sup {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} (_ : @AlexandrovDiscrete α t₁)
(_ : @AlexandrovDiscrete α t₂) :
@AlexandrovDiscrete α (t₁ ⊔ t₂) :=
@AlexandrovDiscrete.mk α (t₁ ⊔ t₂) fun _S hS ↦
⟨@isOpen_sInter _ t₁ _ _ fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).1, isOpen_sInter fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).2⟩
lemma alexandrovDiscrete_iSup {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} (_ : ∀ i, @AlexandrovDiscrete α (t i)) :
@AlexandrovDiscrete α (⨆ i, t i) :=
@AlexandrovDiscrete.mk α (⨆ i, t i)
fun _S hS ↦ isOpen_iSup_iff.2
fun i ↦ @isOpen_sInter _ (t i) _ _
fun _s hs ↦ isOpen_iSup_iff.1 (hS _ hs) _
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [AlexandrovDiscrete α] [AlexandrovDiscrete β]
{s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma isOpen_exterior : IsOpen (exterior s) := by
rw [exterior_def]; exact isOpen_sInter fun _ ↦ And.left
lemma exterior_mem_nhdsSet : exterior s ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := isOpen_exterior.mem_nhdsSet.2 subset_exterior
@[simp] lemma exterior_eq_iff_isOpen : exterior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ isOpen_exterior, IsOpen.exterior_eq⟩
@[simp] lemma exterior_subset_iff_isOpen : exterior s ⊆ s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [exterior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, subset_exterior, and_true]
lemma exterior_subset_iff : exterior s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨exterior s, isOpen_exterior, subset_exterior, h⟩,
fun ⟨_U, hU, hsU, hUt⟩ ↦ (exterior_minimal hsU hU).trans hUt⟩
lemma exterior_subset_iff_mem_nhdsSet : exterior s ⊆ t ↔ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
exterior_subset_iff.trans mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists.symm
lemma exterior_singleton_subset_iff_mem_nhds : exterior {a} ⊆ t ↔ t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
simp [exterior_subset_iff_mem_nhdsSet]
lemma gc_exterior_interior : GaloisConnection (exterior : Set α → Set α) interior :=
fun s t ↦ by simp [exterior_subset_iff, subset_interior_iff]
@[simp] lemma principal_exterior (s : Set α) : 𝓟 (exterior s) = 𝓝ˢ s := by
rw [← nhdsSet_exterior, isOpen_exterior.nhdsSet_eq]
lemma isOpen_iff_forall_specializes : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x y, x ⤳ y → y ∈ s → x ∈ s := by
simp only [← exterior_subset_iff_isOpen, Set.subset_def, mem_exterior_iff_specializes, exists_imp,
and_imp, @forall_swap (_ ⤳ _)]
lemma alexandrovDiscrete_coinduced {β : Type*} {f : α → β} :
@AlexandrovDiscrete β (coinduced f ‹_›) :=
@AlexandrovDiscrete.mk β (coinduced f ‹_›) fun S hS ↦ by
rw [isOpen_coinduced, preimage_sInter]; exact isOpen_iInter₂ hS
instance AlexandrovDiscrete.toFirstCountable : FirstCountableTopology α where
nhds_generated_countable a := ⟨{exterior {a}}, countable_singleton _, by simp⟩
instance AlexandrovDiscrete.toLocallyCompactSpace : LocallyCompactSpace α where
local_compact_nhds a _U hU := ⟨exterior {a},
isOpen_exterior.mem_nhds <| subset_exterior <| mem_singleton _,
exterior_singleton_subset_iff_mem_nhds.2 hU, isCompact_singleton.exterior⟩
instance Subtype.instAlexandrovDiscrete {p : α → Prop} : AlexandrovDiscrete {a // p a} :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.alexandrovDiscrete
instance Quotient.instAlexandrovDiscrete {s : Setoid α} : AlexandrovDiscrete (Quotient s) :=
alexandrovDiscrete_coinduced
instance Sum.instAlexandrovDiscrete : AlexandrovDiscrete (α ⊕ β) :=
alexandrovDiscrete_coinduced.sup alexandrovDiscrete_coinduced
instance Sigma.instAlexandrovDiscrete {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
[∀ i, AlexandrovDiscrete (π i)] : AlexandrovDiscrete (Σ i, π i) :=
alexandrovDiscrete_iSup fun _ ↦ alexandrovDiscrete_coinduced
end
| Mathlib/Topology/AlexandrovDiscrete.lean | 205 | 211 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels
In a category with zero morphisms, the kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is
the equalizer of `f` and `0 : X ⟶ Y`. (Similarly the cokernel is the coequalizer.)
The basic definitions are
* `kernel : (X ⟶ Y) → C`
* `kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X`
* `kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0` and
* `kernel.lift (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f` (as well as the dual versions)
## Main statements
Besides the definition and lifts, we prove
* `kernel.ιZeroIsIso`: a kernel map of a zero morphism is an isomorphism
* `kernel.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel`: if `kernel.ι f` is an epimorphism, then `f = 0`
* `kernel.ofMono`: the kernel of a monomorphism is the zero object
* `kernel.liftMono`: the lift of a monomorphism `k : W ⟶ X` such that `k ≫ f = 0`
is still a monomorphism
* `kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone`: if our category has a zero object, then the map from the zero
object is a kernel map of any monomorphism
* `kernel.ιOfZero`: `kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)` is an isomorphism
and the corresponding dual statements.
## Future work
* TODO: connect this with existing work in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₂ u u' u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- A morphism `f` has a kernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasKernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)
/-- A morphism `f` has a cokernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
section
/-- A kernel fork is just a fork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev KernelFork :=
Fork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem KernelFork.condition (s : KernelFork f) : Fork.ι s ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [Fork.condition, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem KernelFork.app_one (s : KernelFork f) : s.π.app one = 0 := by
simp [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
/-- A morphism `ι` satisfying `ι ≫ f = 0` determines a kernel fork over `f`. -/
abbrev KernelFork.ofι {Z : C} (ι : Z ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) : KernelFork f :=
Fork.ofι ι <| by rw [w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
@[simp]
theorem KernelFork.ι_ofι {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) :
Fork.ι (KernelFork.ofι ι w) = ι := rfl
section
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy nor case_bash
/-- Every kernel fork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `fork.ofι (fork.ι s) _`. -/
def isoOfι (s : Fork f 0) : s ≅ Fork.ofι (Fork.ι s) (Fork.condition s) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by rintro ⟨j⟩ <;> simp
/-- If `ι = ι'`, then `fork.ofι ι _` and `fork.ofι ι' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofιCongr {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} {w : ι ≫ f = 0} (h : ι = ι') :
KernelFork.ofι ι w ≅ KernelFork.ofι ι' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
/-- If `F` is an equivalence, then applying `F` to a diagram indexing a (co)kernel of `f` yields
the diagram indexing the (co)kernel of `F.map f`. -/
def compNatIso {D : Type u'} [Category.{v} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.IsEquivalence] :
parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F ≅ parallelPair (F.map f) 0 :=
let app (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F).obj j ≅ (parallelPair (F.map f) 0).obj j :=
match j with
| zero => Iso.refl _
| one => Iso.refl _
NatIso.ofComponents app <| by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ <;> intro g <;> cases g <;> simp [app]
end
/-- If `s` is a limit kernel fork and `k : W ⟶ X` satisfies `k ≫ f = 0`, then there is some
`l : W ⟶ s.X` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a kernel fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : KernelFork f) (lift : ∀ s : KernelFork f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : KernelFork f, lift s ≫ t.ι = s.ι)
(uniq : ∀ (s : KernelFork f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· exact fac s
· simp
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.zero) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` constructed using
`KernelFork.ofι` is a limit cone.
-/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (eq : g ≫ f = 0)
(lift : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (_ : g' ≫ f = 0), W' ⟶ W)
(fac : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0), lift g' eq' ≫ g = g')
(uniq :
∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0) (m : W' ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ g = g'), m = lift g' eq') :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι g eq) :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => lift s.ι s.condition) (fun s => fac s.ι s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.ι s.condition
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` of the form
`KernelFork.ofι i _` is a limit cone when we know that `i` is a monomorphism. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι' {X Y K : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (i : K ⟶ X) (w : i ≫ f = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : A ⟶ X) (_ : k ≫ f = 0), { l : A ⟶ K // l ≫ i = k}) [hi : Mono i] :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i w) :=
ofι _ _ (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_mono i, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every kernel of `f` induces a kernel of `f ≫ g` if `g` is mono. -/
def isKernelCompMono {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g] {h : X ⟶ Z}
(hh : h = f ≫ g) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι (by simp [hh]) : KernelFork h) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : KernelFork f := Fork.ofι s.ι (by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp [← hh, s.condition])
let l := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' i s'.ι s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
theorem isKernelCompMono_lift {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g]
{h : X ⟶ Z} (hh : h = f ≫ g) (s : KernelFork h) :
(isKernelCompMono i g hh).lift s = i.lift (Fork.ofι s.ι (by
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) := rfl
/-- Every kernel of `f ≫ g` is also a kernel of `f`, as long as `c.ι ≫ f` vanishes. -/
def isKernelOfComp {W : C} (g : Y ⟶ W) (h : X ⟶ W) {c : KernelFork h} (i : IsLimit c)
(hf : c.ι ≫ f = 0) (hfg : f ≫ g = h) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι hf) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => i.lift (KernelFork.ofι s.ι (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι]) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; simpa using h
/-- `X` identifies to the kernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (𝟙 X) (show 𝟙 X ≫ f = 0 by rw [hf, comp_zero])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.comp_id _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.comp_id])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the kernel of a given monomorphisms. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hf : Mono f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsLimit c :=
isLimitAux _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [zero_comp, ← cancel_mono f, zero_comp, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_tgt _ _)
lemma KernelFork.IsLimit.isIso_ι {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hc : IsLimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.ι := by
let e : c.pt ≅ X := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : e.inv ≫ c.ι = 𝟙 X := Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hc
haveI : IsIso (e.inv ≫ c.ι) := by
rw [eq]
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left e.inv c.ι
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, `e : X ≅ X'` and `g' : X' ⟶ Y` is a morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{X' Y' : C} (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (e : X ≅ X')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') (c.ι ≫ e.hom) (by simp [← iff])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun s hs ↦ hc.lift (KernelFork.ofι (ι := s ≫ e.inv)
(by rw [iff, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, hs])))
(fun s hs ↦ by simp [← cancel_mono e.inv])
(fun s hs m hm ↦ Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by simpa [← cancel_mono e.hom] using hm))
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, and `g' : X ⟶ Y'` is a another morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff' {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{Y' : C} (g' : X ⟶ Y')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') c.ι (by simp [← iff])) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff hc g' (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using iff))
(Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
end
namespace KernelFork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of kernel forks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsLimit (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ⟶ kf'.pt :=
hf'.lift (KernelFork.ofι (kf.ι ≫ φ.left) (by simp))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapOfIsLimit_ι (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ ≫ kf'.ι = kf.ι ≫ φ.left :=
hf'.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit kernel forks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsLimit {kf : KernelFork f} {kf' : KernelFork f'}
(hf : IsLimit kf) (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ≅ kf'.pt where
hom := kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ.hom
inv := kf'.mapOfIsLimit hf φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end KernelFork
section
variable [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism, expressed as the equalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev kernel (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] : C :=
equalizer f 0
/-- The map from `kernel f` into the source of `f`. -/
abbrev kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X :=
equalizer.ι f 0
@[simp]
theorem equalizer_as_kernel : equalizer.ι f 0 = kernel.ι f := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0 :=
KernelFork.condition _
/-- The kernel built from `kernel.ι f` is limiting. -/
def kernelIsKernel : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (kernel.ι f) ((kernel.condition f).trans comp_zero.symm)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- Given any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0`, `k` factors through `kernel.ι f`
via `kernel.lift : W ⟶ kernel f`. -/
abbrev kernel.lift {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f :=
(kernelIsKernel f).lift (KernelFork.ofι k h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.lift_ι {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : kernel.lift f k h ≫ kernel.ι f = k :=
(kernelIsKernel f).fac (KernelFork.ofι k h) WalkingParallelPair.zero
@[simp]
theorem kernel.lift_zero {W : C} {h} : kernel.lift f (0 : W ⟶ X) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
instance kernel.lift_mono {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) [Mono k] : Mono (kernel.lift f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := w =≫ kernel.ι f
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.lift_ι] at w
exact (cancel_mono k).1 w⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ kernel f` such that
`l ≫ kernel.ι f = k`. -/
def kernel.lift' {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ kernel f // l ≫ kernel.ι f = k } :=
⟨kernel.lift f k h, kernel.lift_ι _ _ _⟩
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of kernels. -/
abbrev kernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : kernel f ⟶ kernel f' :=
kernel.lift f' (kernel.ι f ≫ p) (by simp [← w])
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
X ---> kernel g
| |
| | kernel.map
| |
v v
X' --> kernel g'
-/
theorem kernel.lift_map {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(f' : X' ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') [HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
kernel.lift g f w ≫ kernel.map g g' q r h₂ = p ≫ kernel.lift g' f' w' := by
ext; simp [h₁]
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of kernels. -/
@[simps]
def kernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : kernel f ≅ kernel f' where
hom := kernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv :=
kernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv
(by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
/-- Every kernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance kernel.ι_zero_isIso : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
theorem eq_zero_of_epi_kernel [Epi (kernel.ι f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_epi (kernel.ι f)).1 (by simp)
/-- The kernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def kernelZeroIsoSource : kernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ X :=
equalizer.isoSourceOfSelf 0
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_hom : kernelZeroIsoSource.hom = kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_inv :
kernelZeroIsoSource.inv = kernel.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 X) (by simp) := by
ext
simp [kernelZeroIsoSource]
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their kernels are isomorphic. -/
def kernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g :=
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : kernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (kernel f) := by
ext
simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
/- Porting note: induction on Eq is trying instantiate another g... -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ kernel.ι g = kernel.ι f := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ kernel.ι _ = kernel.ι _ := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).hom = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).inv = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] [HasKernel h] (w₁ : f = g)
(w₂ : g = h) : kernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ kernelIsoOfEq w₂ = kernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
variable {f}
theorem kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : ¬Epi (kernel.ι f) := fun _ =>
w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
theorem kernel_not_iso_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso (kernel.ι f) → False := fun _ =>
kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero w inferInstance
instance hasKernel_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] :
HasKernel (f ≫ g) :=
⟨⟨{ cone := _
isLimit := isKernelCompMono (limit.isLimit _) g rfl }⟩⟩
/-- When `g` is a monomorphism, the kernel of `f ≫ g` is isomorphic to the kernel of `f`.
-/
@[simps]
def kernelCompMono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel f] [Mono g] :
kernel (f ≫ g) ≅ kernel f where
hom :=
kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _)
(by
rw [← cancel_mono g]
simp)
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _) (by simp)
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The `symm` wasn't previously necessary. -/
instance hasKernel_iso_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [HasKernel g] :
HasKernel (f ≫ g) where
exists_limit :=
⟨{ cone := KernelFork.ofι (kernel.ι g ≫ inv f) (by simp)
isLimit := isLimitAux _ (fun s => kernel.lift _ (s.ι ≫ f) (by simp))
(by simp) fun s m w => by
simp_rw [← w]
symm
apply equalizer.hom_ext
simp }⟩
/-- When `f` is an isomorphism, the kernel of `f ≫ g` is isomorphic to the kernel of `g`.
-/
@[simps]
def kernelIsIsoComp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [HasKernel g] :
kernel (f ≫ g) ≅ kernel g where
hom := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _ ≫ f) (by simp)
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι _ ≫ inv f) (by simp)
/-- Equal maps have isomorphic kernels. -/
@[simps] def kernel.congr {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g]
(h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g where
hom := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι f) (by simp [← h])
inv := kernel.lift _ (kernel.ι g) (by simp [h])
end
section HasZeroObject
variable [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
/-- The morphism from the zero object determines a cone on a kernel diagram -/
def kernel.zeroKernelFork : KernelFork f where
pt := 0
π := { app := fun _ => 0 }
/-- The map from the zero object is a kernel of a monomorphism -/
def kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone [Mono f] : IsLimit (kernel.zeroKernelFork f) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun _ => 0)
(fun s => by
rw [zero_comp]
refine (zero_of_comp_mono f ?_).symm
exact KernelFork.condition _)
fun _ _ _ => zero_of_to_zero _
/-- The kernel of a monomorphism is isomorphic to the zero object -/
def kernel.ofMono [HasKernel f] [Mono f] : kernel f ≅ 0 :=
Functor.mapIso (Cones.forget _) <|
IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit (parallelPair f 0)) (kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone f)
/-- The kernel morphism of a monomorphism is a zero morphism -/
theorem kernel.ι_of_mono [HasKernel f] [Mono f] : kernel.ι f = 0 :=
zero_of_source_iso_zero _ (kernel.ofMono f)
/-- If `g ≫ f = 0` implies `g = 0` for all `g`, then `0 : 0 ⟶ X` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def zeroKernelOfCancelZero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(hf : ∀ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (_ : g ≫ f = 0), g = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (0 : 0 ⟶ X) (show 0 ≫ f = 0 by simp)) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [hf _ _ (KernelFork.condition s), zero_comp])
fun s m _ => by dsimp; apply HasZeroObject.to_zero_ext
end HasZeroObject
section Transport
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `l ≫ i.hom = f`, any kernel of `f` is a kernel of `l`. -/
def IsKernel.ofCompIso {Z : C} (l : X ⟶ Z) (i : Z ≅ Y) (h : l ≫ i.hom = f) {s : KernelFork f}
(hs : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (Fork.ι s) <| show Fork.ι s ≫ l = 0 by simp [← i.comp_inv_eq.2 h.symm]) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι (Fork.ι s) <| by simp [← h])
(fun s => by simp) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hs
simpa using h
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `l ≫ i.hom = f`, the kernel of `f` is a kernel of `l`. -/
def kernel.ofCompIso [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (l : X ⟶ Z) (i : Z ≅ Y) (h : l ≫ i.hom = f) :
IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (kernel.ι f) <| show kernel.ι f ≫ l = 0 by simp [← i.comp_inv_eq.2 h.symm]) :=
IsKernel.ofCompIso f l i h <| limit.isLimit _
/-- If `s` is any limit kernel cone over `f` and if `i` is an isomorphism such that
`i.hom ≫ s.ι = l`, then `l` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def IsKernel.isoKernel {Z : C} (l : Z ⟶ X) {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) (i : Z ≅ s.pt)
(h : i.hom ≫ Fork.ι s = l) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι l <| show l ≫ f = 0 by simp [← h]) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hs <|
Cones.ext i.symm fun j => by
cases j
· exact (Iso.eq_inv_comp i).2 h
· dsimp; rw [← h]; simp
/-- If `i` is an isomorphism such that `i.hom ≫ kernel.ι f = l`, then `l` is a kernel of `f`. -/
def kernel.isoKernel [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (l : Z ⟶ X) (i : Z ≅ kernel f)
(h : i.hom ≫ kernel.ι f = l) :
IsLimit (@KernelFork.ofι _ _ _ _ _ f _ l <| by simp [← h]) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel f l (limit.isLimit _) i h
end Transport
section
variable (X Y)
/-- The kernel morphism of a zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
theorem kernel.ι_of_zero : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
end
section
/-- A cokernel cofork is just a cofork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev CokernelCofork :=
Cofork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem CokernelCofork.condition (s : CokernelCofork f) : f ≫ s.π = 0 := by
rw [Cofork.condition, zero_comp]
theorem CokernelCofork.π_eq_zero (s : CokernelCofork f) : s.ι.app zero = 0 := by
simp [Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right]
/-- A morphism `π` satisfying `f ≫ π = 0` determines a cokernel cofork on `f`. -/
abbrev CokernelCofork.ofπ {Z : C} (π : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ π = 0) : CokernelCofork f :=
Cofork.ofπ π <| by rw [w, zero_comp]
@[simp]
theorem CokernelCofork.π_ofπ {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = 0) :
Cofork.π (CokernelCofork.ofπ π w) = π :=
rfl
/-- Every cokernel cofork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `cofork.ofπ (cofork.π s) _`. -/
def isoOfπ (s : Cofork f 0) : s ≅ Cofork.ofπ (Cofork.π s) (Cofork.condition s) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases j <;> aesop_cat
/-- If `π = π'`, then `CokernelCofork.of_π π _` and `CokernelCofork.of_π π' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofπCongr {P : C} {π π' : Y ⟶ P} {w : f ≫ π = 0} (h : π = π') :
CokernelCofork.ofπ π w ≅ CokernelCofork.ofπ π' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases j <;> aesop_cat
/-- If `s` is a colimit cokernel cofork, then every `k : Y ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ k = 0` induces
`l : s.X ⟶ W` such that `cofork.π s ≫ l = k`. -/
def CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' {s : CokernelCofork f} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = 0) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // Cofork.π s ≫ l = k } :=
⟨hs.desc <| CokernelCofork.ofπ _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a cokernel cofork is a colimit cocone.
| It only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isColimitAux (t : CokernelCofork f) (desc : ∀ s : CokernelCofork f, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 576 | 577 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
|
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 727 | 730 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
/-!
# Congruences modulo a natural number
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [MOD n]` on the natural numbers,
and proves basic properties about it such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem
`modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul`.
## Notations
`a ≡ b [MOD n]` is notation for `nat.ModEq n a b`, which is defined to mean `a % n = b % n`.
## Tags
ModEq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Function.support
namespace Nat
/-- Modular equality. `n.ModEq a b`, or `a ≡ b [MOD n]`, means that `a - b` is a multiple of `n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℕ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [MOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℕ}
-- Since `ModEq` is semi-reducible, we need to provide the decidable instance manually
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (a % n = b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl]
protected theorem refl (a : ℕ) : a ≡ a [MOD n] := rfl
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [MOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ c [MOD n] → a ≡ c [MOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : Trans (ModEq n) (ModEq n) (ModEq n) where
trans := Nat.ModEq.trans
protected theorem comm : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
end ModEq
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by rw [ModEq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_nat (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_nat (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [MOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_nat.symm
theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (n : ℤ) ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mod,
Int.emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero, Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
alias ⟨ModEq.dvd, modEq_of_dvd⟩ := modEq_iff_dvd
/-- A variant of `modEq_iff_dvd` with `Nat` divisibility -/
theorem modEq_iff_dvd' (h : a ≤ b) : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.ofNat_sub h]
theorem mod_modEq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [MOD n] :=
mod_mod _ _
namespace ModEq
lemma of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
modEq_of_dvd <| Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr d |>.trans h.dvd
protected theorem mul_left' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * n] := by
unfold ModEq at *; rw [mul_mod_mul_left, mul_mod_mul_left, h]
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD n] :=
(h.mul_left' _).of_dvd (dvd_mul_left _ _)
protected theorem mul_right' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n * c] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left' c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact h.mul_left c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD n] :=
(h₂.mul_left _).trans (h₁.mul_right _)
@[gcongr]
protected theorem pow (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ^ m ≡ b ^ m [MOD n] := by
induction m with
| zero => rfl
| succ d hd =>
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ]
exact hd.mul h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_add, add_sub_add_comm]
exact Int.dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n] :=
h.add ModEq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
c ≡ d [MOD n] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add] at *
rw [add_sub_add_comm] at h₂
convert Int.dvd_sub h₂ h₁ using 1
rw [add_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂
exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
/-- Cancel left multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_left`. -/
protected theorem mul_left_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.mul_sub]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_left_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_left_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_left' _⟩
/-- Cancel right multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_right`. -/
protected theorem mul_right_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.sub_mul]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_right_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_right_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_right' _⟩
/-- Cancel left multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_left_cancel'`. -/
lemma of_mul_left (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd] at *
exact (dvd_mul_left (n : ℤ) (m : ℤ)).trans h
/-- Cancel right multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_right_cancel'`. -/
lemma of_mul_right (m : ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD n * m] → a ≡ b [MOD n] := mul_comm m n ▸ of_mul_left _
theorem of_div (h : a / c ≡ b / c [MOD m / c]) (ha : c ∣ a) (ha : c ∣ b) (ha : c ∣ m) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] := by convert h.mul_left' c <;> rwa [Nat.mul_div_cancel']
end ModEq
lemma modEq_sub (h : b ≤ a) : a ≡ b [MOD a - b] := (modEq_of_dvd <| by rw [Int.ofNat_sub h]).symm
lemma modEq_one : a ≡ b [MOD 1] := modEq_of_dvd <| one_dvd _
@[simp] lemma modEq_zero_iff : a ≡ b [MOD 0] ↔ a = b := by rw [ModEq, mod_zero, mod_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_modEq_left : n + a ≡ a [MOD n] := by rw [ModEq, add_mod_left]
@[simp] lemma add_modEq_right : a + n ≡ a [MOD n] := by rw [ModEq, add_mod_right]
namespace ModEq
theorem le_of_lt_add (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b + m) : a ≤ b :=
(le_total a b).elim id fun h3 =>
Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero
(eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt ((modEq_iff_dvd' h3).mp h1.symm) (by omega))
theorem add_le_of_lt (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b) : a + m ≤ b :=
le_of_lt_add (add_modEq_right.trans h1) (by omega)
theorem dvd_iff (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (hdm : d ∣ m) : d ∣ a ↔ d ∣ b := by
simp only [← modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
replace h := h.of_dvd hdm
exact ⟨h.symm.trans, h.trans⟩
theorem gcd_eq (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) : gcd a m = gcd b m := by
have h1 := gcd_dvd_right a m
have h2 := gcd_dvd_right b m
exact
dvd_antisymm (dvd_gcd ((h.dvd_iff h1).mp (gcd_dvd_left a m)) h1)
(dvd_gcd ((h.dvd_iff h2).mpr (gcd_dvd_left b m)) h2)
lemma eq_of_abs_lt (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : |(b : ℤ) - a| < m) : a = b := by
apply Int.ofNat.inj
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]
exact Int.eq_zero_of_abs_lt_dvd h.dvd h2
lemma eq_of_lt_of_lt (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (ha : a < m) (hb : b < m) : a = b :=
h.eq_of_abs_lt <| Int.abs_sub_lt_of_lt_lt ha hb
/-- To cancel a common factor `c` from a `ModEq` we must divide the modulus `m` by `gcd m c` -/
lemma cancel_left_div_gcd (hm : 0 < m) (h : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD m]) : a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] := by
let d := gcd m c
have hmd := gcd_dvd_left m c
have hcd := gcd_dvd_right m c
| rw [modEq_iff_dvd]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ModEq.lean | 238 | 238 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
/-!
# Minimum and maximum w.r.t. a filter and on a set
## Main Definitions
This file defines six predicates of the form `isAB`, where `A` is `Min`, `Max`, or `Extr`,
and `B` is `Filter` or `On`.
* `isMinFilter f l a` means that `f a ≤ f x` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a`;
* `isMaxFilter f l a` means that `f x ≤ f a` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a`;
* `isExtrFilter f l a` means `isMinFilter f l a` or `isMaxFilter f l a`.
Similar predicates with `on` suffix are particular cases for `l = 𝓟 s`.
## Main statements
### Change of the filter (set) argument
* `is*Filter.filter_mono` : replace the filter with a smaller one;
* `is*Filter.filter_inf` : replace a filter `l` with `l ⊓ l'`;
* `is*On.on_subset` : restrict to a smaller set;
* `is*Pn.inter` : replace a set `s` with `s ∩ t`.
### Composition
* `is**.comp_mono` : if `x` is an extremum for `f` and `g` is a monotone function,
then `x` is an extremum for `g ∘ f`;
* `is**.comp_antitone` : similarly for the case of antitone `g`;
* `is**.bicomp_mono` : if `x` is an extremum of the same type for `f` and `g`
and a binary operation `op` is monotone in both arguments, then `x` is an extremum
of the same type for `fun x => op (f x) (g x)`.
* `is*Filter.comp_tendsto` : if `g x` is an extremum for `f` w.r.t. `l'` and `Tendsto g l l'`,
then `x` is an extremum for `f ∘ g` w.r.t. `l`.
* `is*On.on_preimage` : if `g x` is an extremum for `f` on `s`, then `x` is an extremum
for `f ∘ g` on `g ⁻¹' s`.
### Algebraic operations
* `is**.add` : if `x` is an extremum of the same type for two functions,
then it is an extremum of the same type for their sum;
* `is**.neg` : if `x` is an extremum for `f`, then it is an extremum
of the opposite type for `-f`;
* `is**.sub` : if `x` is a minimum for `f` and a maximum for `g`,
then it is a minimum for `f - g` and a maximum for `g - f`;
* `is**.max`, `is**.min`, `is**.sup`, `is**.inf` : similarly for `is**.add`
for pointwise `max`, `min`, `sup`, `inf`, respectively.
### Miscellaneous definitions
* `is**_const` : any point is both a minimum and maximum for a constant function;
* `isMin/Max*.isExt` : any minimum/maximum point is an extremum;
* `is**.dual`, `is**.undual`: conversion between codomains `α` and `dual α`;
## Missing features (TODO)
* Multiplication and division;
* `is**.bicompl` : if `x` is a minimum for `f`, `y` is a minimum for `g`, and `op` is a monotone
binary operation, then `(x, y)` is a minimum for `uncurry (bicompl op f g)`. From this point
of view, `is**.bicomp` is a composition
* It would be nice to have a tactic that specializes `comp_(anti)mono` or `bicomp_mono`
based on a proof of monotonicity of a given (binary) function. The tactic should maintain a `meta`
list of known (anti)monotone (binary) functions with their names, as well as a list of special
types of filters, and define the missing lemmas once one of these two lists grows.
-/
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
open Set Filter Relator
open Filter
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
variable (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (l : Filter α) (a : α)
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- `IsMinFilter f l a` means that `f a ≤ f x` for all `x` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a` -/
def IsMinFilter : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f a ≤ f x
/-- `is_maxFilter f l a` means that `f x ≤ f a` for all `x` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a` -/
def IsMaxFilter : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ f a
/-- `IsExtrFilter f l a` means `IsMinFilter f l a` or `IsMaxFilter f l a` -/
def IsExtrFilter : Prop :=
IsMinFilter f l a ∨ IsMaxFilter f l a
/-- `IsMinOn f s a` means that `f a ≤ f x` for all `x ∈ s`. Note that we do not assume `a ∈ s`. -/
def IsMinOn :=
IsMinFilter f (𝓟 s) a
/-- `IsMaxOn f s a` means that `f x ≤ f a` for all `x ∈ s`. Note that we do not assume `a ∈ s`. -/
def IsMaxOn :=
IsMaxFilter f (𝓟 s) a
/-- `IsExtrOn f s a` means `IsMinOn f s a` or `IsMaxOn f s a` -/
def IsExtrOn : Prop :=
IsExtrFilter f (𝓟 s) a
variable {f s a l} {t : Set α} {l' : Filter α}
theorem IsExtrOn.elim {p : Prop} : IsExtrOn f s a → (IsMinOn f s a → p) → (IsMaxOn f s a → p) → p :=
Or.elim
theorem isMinOn_iff : IsMinOn f s a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f a ≤ f x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isMaxOn_iff : IsMaxOn f s a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ f a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isMinOn_univ_iff : IsMinOn f univ a ↔ ∀ x, f a ≤ f x :=
univ_subset_iff.trans eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem isMaxOn_univ_iff : IsMaxOn f univ a ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ f a :=
univ_subset_iff.trans eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem IsMinFilter.tendsto_principal_Ici (h : IsMinFilter f l a) : Tendsto f l (𝓟 <| Ici (f a)) :=
tendsto_principal.2 h
theorem IsMaxFilter.tendsto_principal_Iic (h : IsMaxFilter f l a) : Tendsto f l (𝓟 <| Iic (f a)) :=
tendsto_principal.2 h
/-! ### Conversion to `IsExtr*` -/
theorem IsMinFilter.isExtr : IsMinFilter f l a → IsExtrFilter f l a :=
Or.inl
theorem IsMaxFilter.isExtr : IsMaxFilter f l a → IsExtrFilter f l a :=
Or.inr
theorem IsMinOn.isExtr (h : IsMinOn f s a) : IsExtrOn f s a :=
IsMinFilter.isExtr h
theorem IsMaxOn.isExtr (h : IsMaxOn f s a) : IsExtrOn f s a :=
IsMaxFilter.isExtr h
/-! ### Constant function -/
theorem isMinFilter_const {b : β} : IsMinFilter (fun _ => b) l a :=
univ_mem' fun _ => le_rfl
theorem isMaxFilter_const {b : β} : IsMaxFilter (fun _ => b) l a :=
univ_mem' fun _ => le_rfl
theorem isExtrFilter_const {b : β} : IsExtrFilter (fun _ => b) l a :=
isMinFilter_const.isExtr
theorem isMinOn_const {b : β} : IsMinOn (fun _ => b) s a :=
isMinFilter_const
theorem isMaxOn_const {b : β} : IsMaxOn (fun _ => b) s a :=
isMaxFilter_const
theorem isExtrOn_const {b : β} : IsExtrOn (fun _ => b) s a :=
isExtrFilter_const
/-! ### Order dual -/
open OrderDual (toDual)
theorem isMinFilter_dual_iff : IsMinFilter (toDual ∘ f) l a ↔ IsMaxFilter f l a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isMaxFilter_dual_iff : IsMaxFilter (toDual ∘ f) l a ↔ IsMinFilter f l a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isExtrFilter_dual_iff : IsExtrFilter (toDual ∘ f) l a ↔ IsExtrFilter f l a :=
or_comm
alias ⟨IsMinFilter.undual, IsMaxFilter.dual⟩ := isMinFilter_dual_iff
alias ⟨IsMaxFilter.undual, IsMinFilter.dual⟩ := isMaxFilter_dual_iff
alias ⟨IsExtrFilter.undual, IsExtrFilter.dual⟩ := isExtrFilter_dual_iff
theorem isMinOn_dual_iff : IsMinOn (toDual ∘ f) s a ↔ IsMaxOn f s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isMaxOn_dual_iff : IsMaxOn (toDual ∘ f) s a ↔ IsMinOn f s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isExtrOn_dual_iff : IsExtrOn (toDual ∘ f) s a ↔ IsExtrOn f s a :=
or_comm
alias ⟨IsMinOn.undual, IsMaxOn.dual⟩ := isMinOn_dual_iff
alias ⟨IsMaxOn.undual, IsMinOn.dual⟩ := isMaxOn_dual_iff
alias ⟨IsExtrOn.undual, IsExtrOn.dual⟩ := isExtrOn_dual_iff
/-! ### Operations on the filter/set -/
theorem IsMinFilter.filter_mono (h : IsMinFilter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) : IsMinFilter f l' a :=
hl h
theorem IsMaxFilter.filter_mono (h : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) : IsMaxFilter f l' a :=
hl h
theorem IsExtrFilter.filter_mono (h : IsExtrFilter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) : IsExtrFilter f l' a :=
h.elim (fun h => (h.filter_mono hl).isExtr) fun h => (h.filter_mono hl).isExtr
theorem IsMinFilter.filter_inf (h : IsMinFilter f l a) (l') : IsMinFilter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IsMaxFilter.filter_inf (h : IsMaxFilter f l a) (l') : IsMaxFilter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IsExtrFilter.filter_inf (h : IsExtrFilter f l a) (l') : IsExtrFilter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IsMinOn.on_subset (hf : IsMinOn f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : IsMinOn f s a :=
hf.filter_mono <| principal_mono.2 h
theorem IsMaxOn.on_subset (hf : IsMaxOn f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : IsMaxOn f s a :=
hf.filter_mono <| principal_mono.2 h
theorem IsExtrOn.on_subset (hf : IsExtrOn f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : IsExtrOn f s a :=
hf.filter_mono <| principal_mono.2 h
theorem IsMinOn.inter (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (t) : IsMinOn f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset inter_subset_left
theorem IsMaxOn.inter (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (t) : IsMaxOn f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset inter_subset_left
theorem IsExtrOn.inter (hf : IsExtrOn f s a) (t) : IsExtrOn f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset inter_subset_left
/-! ### Composition with (anti)monotone functions -/
theorem IsMinFilter.comp_mono (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsMinFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
mem_of_superset hf fun _x hx => hg hx
theorem IsMaxFilter.comp_mono (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsMaxFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
mem_of_superset hf fun _x hx => hg hx
theorem IsExtrFilter.comp_mono (hf : IsExtrFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsExtrFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.elim (fun hf => (hf.comp_mono hg).isExtr) fun hf => (hf.comp_mono hg).isExtr
theorem IsMinFilter.comp_antitone (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsMaxFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono fun _ _ h => hg h
theorem IsMaxFilter.comp_antitone (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsMinFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono fun _ _ h => hg h
theorem IsExtrFilter.comp_antitone (hf : IsExtrFilter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsExtrFilter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono fun _ _ h => hg h
theorem IsMinOn.comp_mono (hf : IsMinOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsMinOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsMinFilter.comp_mono hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.comp_mono (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsMaxOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.comp_mono hf hg
theorem IsExtrOn.comp_mono (hf : IsExtrOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Monotone g) :
IsExtrOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsExtrFilter.comp_mono hf hg
theorem IsMinOn.comp_antitone (hf : IsMinOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsMaxOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsMinFilter.comp_antitone hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.comp_antitone (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsMinOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.comp_antitone hf hg
theorem IsExtrOn.comp_antitone (hf : IsExtrOn f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : Antitone g) :
IsExtrOn (g ∘ f) s a :=
IsExtrFilter.comp_antitone hf hg
theorem IsMinFilter.bicomp_mono [Preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ}
(hop : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) op op) (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) {g : α → γ}
(hg : IsMinFilter g l a) : IsMinFilter (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l a :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hf hg) fun _x ⟨hfx, hgx⟩ => hop hfx hgx
theorem IsMaxFilter.bicomp_mono [Preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ}
(hop : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) op op) (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) {g : α → γ}
(hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) : IsMaxFilter (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l a :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hf hg) fun _x ⟨hfx, hgx⟩ => hop hfx hgx
-- No `Extr` version because we need `hf` and `hg` to be of the same kind
theorem IsMinOn.bicomp_mono [Preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ}
(hop : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) op op) (hf : IsMinOn f s a) {g : α → γ}
(hg : IsMinOn g s a) : IsMinOn (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) s a :=
IsMinFilter.bicomp_mono hop hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.bicomp_mono [Preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ}
(hop : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) op op) (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) {g : α → γ}
(hg : IsMaxOn g s a) : IsMaxOn (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.bicomp_mono hop hf hg
/-! ### Composition with `Tendsto` -/
theorem IsMinFilter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : Filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : IsMinFilter f l (g b))
(hg : Tendsto g l' l) : IsMinFilter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hg hf
theorem IsMaxFilter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : Filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : IsMaxFilter f l (g b))
(hg : Tendsto g l' l) : IsMaxFilter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hg hf
theorem IsExtrFilter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : Filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : IsExtrFilter f l (g b))
(hg : Tendsto g l' l) : IsExtrFilter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hf.elim (fun hf => (hf.comp_tendsto hg).isExtr) fun hf => (hf.comp_tendsto hg).isExtr
theorem IsMinOn.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : IsMinOn f s (g b)) :
IsMinOn (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.comp_tendsto (tendsto_principal_principal.mpr <| Subset.refl _)
theorem IsMaxOn.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : IsMaxOn f s (g b)) :
IsMaxOn (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.comp_tendsto (tendsto_principal_principal.mpr <| Subset.refl _)
theorem IsExtrOn.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : IsExtrOn f s (g b)) :
IsExtrOn (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.elim (fun hf => (hf.on_preimage g).isExtr) fun hf => (hf.on_preimage g).isExtr
theorem IsMinOn.comp_mapsTo {t : Set δ} {g : δ → α} {b : δ} (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : MapsTo g t s)
(ha : g b = a) : IsMinOn (f ∘ g) t b := fun y hy => by
simpa only [ha, (· ∘ ·)] using hf (hg hy)
theorem IsMaxOn.comp_mapsTo {t : Set δ} {g : δ → α} {b : δ} (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : MapsTo g t s)
(ha : g b = a) : IsMaxOn (f ∘ g) t b :=
hf.dual.comp_mapsTo hg ha
theorem IsExtrOn.comp_mapsTo {t : Set δ} {g : δ → α} {b : δ} (hf : IsExtrOn f s a)
(hg : MapsTo g t s) (ha : g b = a) : IsExtrOn (f ∘ g) t b :=
hf.elim (fun h => Or.inl <| h.comp_mapsTo hg ha) fun h => Or.inr <| h.comp_mapsTo hg ha
end Preorder
/-! ### Pointwise addition -/
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
{f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsMinFilter.add (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => f x + g x) l a :=
show IsMinFilter (fun x => f x + g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => add_le_add hx hy) hg
theorem IsMaxFilter.add (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x + g x) l a :=
show IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x + g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => add_le_add hx hy) hg
theorem IsMinOn.add (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : IsMinOn g s a) : IsMinOn (fun x => f x + g x) s a :=
IsMinFilter.add hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.add (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : IsMaxOn g s a) : IsMaxOn (fun x => f x + g x) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.add hf hg
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
/-! ### Pointwise negation and subtraction -/
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
{f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsMinFilter.neg (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) : IsMaxFilter (fun x => -f x) l a :=
hf.comp_antitone fun _x _y hx => neg_le_neg hx
theorem IsMaxFilter.neg (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) : IsMinFilter (fun x => -f x) l a :=
hf.comp_antitone fun _x _y hx => neg_le_neg hx
theorem IsExtrFilter.neg (hf : IsExtrFilter f l a) : IsExtrFilter (fun x => -f x) l a :=
hf.elim (fun hf => hf.neg.isExtr) fun hf => hf.neg.isExtr
theorem IsMinOn.neg (hf : IsMinOn f s a) : IsMaxOn (fun x => -f x) s a :=
hf.comp_antitone fun _x _y hx => neg_le_neg hx
theorem IsMaxOn.neg (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) : IsMinOn (fun x => -f x) s a :=
hf.comp_antitone fun _x _y hx => neg_le_neg hx
theorem IsExtrOn.neg (hf : IsExtrOn f s a) : IsExtrOn (fun x => -f x) s a :=
hf.elim (fun hf => hf.neg.isExtr) fun hf => hf.neg.isExtr
theorem IsMinFilter.sub (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => f x - g x) l a := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem IsMaxFilter.sub (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x - g x) l a := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem IsMinOn.sub (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : IsMaxOn g s a) :
IsMinOn (fun x => f x - g x) s a := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem IsMaxOn.sub (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : IsMinOn g s a) :
IsMaxOn (fun x => f x - g x) s a := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
end OrderedAddCommGroup
/-! ### Pointwise `sup`/`inf` -/
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsMinFilter.sup (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) l a :=
show IsMinFilter (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => sup_le_sup hx hy) hg
theorem IsMaxFilter.sup (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) l a :=
show IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => sup_le_sup hx hy) hg
theorem IsMinOn.sup (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : IsMinOn g s a) : IsMinOn (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) s a :=
IsMinFilter.sup hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.sup (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : IsMaxOn g s a) : IsMaxOn (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.sup hf hg
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsMinFilter.inf (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) l a :=
show IsMinFilter (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => inf_le_inf hx hy) hg
theorem IsMaxFilter.inf (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) l a :=
show IsMaxFilter (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => inf_le_inf hx hy) hg
theorem IsMinOn.inf (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : IsMinOn g s a) : IsMinOn (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) s a :=
IsMinFilter.inf hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.inf (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : IsMaxOn g s a) : IsMaxOn (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.inf hf hg
end SemilatticeInf
/-! ### Pointwise `min`/`max` -/
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsMinFilter.min (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => min (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show IsMinFilter (fun x => Min.min (f x) (g x)) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => min_le_min hx hy) hg
theorem IsMaxFilter.min (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => min (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show IsMaxFilter (fun x => Min.min (f x) (g x)) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => min_le_min hx hy) hg
theorem IsMinOn.min (hf : IsMinOn f s a) (hg : IsMinOn g s a) :
IsMinOn (fun x => min (f x) (g x)) s a :=
IsMinFilter.min hf hg
theorem IsMaxOn.min (hf : IsMaxOn f s a) (hg : IsMaxOn g s a) :
IsMaxOn (fun x => min (f x) (g x)) s a :=
IsMaxFilter.min hf hg
theorem IsMinFilter.max (hf : IsMinFilter f l a) (hg : IsMinFilter g l a) :
IsMinFilter (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show IsMinFilter (fun x => Max.max (f x) (g x)) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => max_le_max hx hy) hg
theorem IsMaxFilter.max (hf : IsMaxFilter f l a) (hg : IsMaxFilter g l a) :
IsMaxFilter (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) l a :=
| show IsMaxFilter (fun x => Max.max (f x) (g x)) l a from
hf.bicomp_mono (fun _x _x' hx _y _y' hy => max_le_max hx hy) hg
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Extr.lean | 511 | 513 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 835 | 837 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Besicovitch
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
/-!
# Satellite configurations for Besicovitch covering lemma in vector spaces
The Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a number `N`
such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families, each made of
disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
A key tool in the proof of this theorem is the notion of a satellite configuration, i.e., a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This is a technical notion, but it shows
up naturally in the proof of the Besicovitch theorem (which goes through a greedy algorithm): to
ensure that in the end one needs at most `N` families of balls, the crucial property of the
underlying metric space is that there should be no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points.
This file is devoted to the study of this property in vector spaces: we prove the main result
of [Füredi and Loeb, On the best constant for the Besicovitch covering theorem][furedi-loeb1994],
which shows that the optimal such `N` in a vector space coincides with the maximal number
of points one can put inside the unit ball of radius `2` under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
In particular, this number is bounded by `5 ^ dim` by a straightforward measure argument.
## Main definitions and results
* `multiplicity E` is the maximal number of points one can put inside the unit ball
of radius `2` in the vector space `E`, under the condition that their distances
are bounded below by `1`.
* `multiplicity_le E` shows that `multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ (dim E)`.
* `good_τ E` is a constant `> 1`, but close enough to `1` that satellite configurations
with this parameter `τ` are not worst than for `τ = 1`.
* `isEmpty_satelliteConfig_multiplicity` is the main theorem, saying that there are
no satellite configurations of `(multiplicity E) + 1` points, for the parameter `goodτ E`.
-/
universe u
open Metric Set Module MeasureTheory Filter Fin
open scoped ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Besicovitch
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
/-- Rescaling a satellite configuration in a vector space, to put the basepoint at `0` and the base
radius at `1`. -/
def centerAndRescale : SatelliteConfig E N τ where
c i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ • (a.c i - a.c (last N))
r i := (a.r (last N))⁻¹ * a.r i
rpos i := by positivity
h i j hij := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
rcases a.h hij with (⟨H₁, H₂⟩ | ⟨H₁, H₂⟩) <;> [left; right] <;> constructor <;> gcongr
hlast i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, dist_sub_right, mul_left_comm τ,
Real.norm_of_nonneg]
have ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := a.hlast i hi
constructor <;> gcongr
inter i hi := by
simp (disch := positivity) only [dist_smul₀, ← mul_add, dist_sub_right, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
gcongr
exact a.inter i hi
theorem centerAndRescale_center : a.centerAndRescale.c (last N) = 0 := by
simp [SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale]
theorem centerAndRescale_radius {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ) :
a.centerAndRescale.r (last N) = 1 := by
simp [SatelliteConfig.centerAndRescale, inv_mul_cancel₀ (a.rpos _).ne']
end SatelliteConfig
/-! ### Disjoint balls of radius close to `1` in the radius `2` ball. -/
/-- The maximum cardinality of a `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2`. This is also the
optimal number of families in the Besicovitch covering theorem. -/
def multiplicity (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] :=
sSup {N | ∃ s : Finset E, s.card = N ∧ (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) ∧ ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖}
section
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- Any `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` has cardinality at most `5 ^ dim`. This is
useful to show that the supremum in the definition of `Besicovitch.multiplicity E` is
well behaved. -/
theorem card_le_of_separated (s : Finset E) (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
/- We consider balls of radius `1/2` around the points in `s`. They are disjoint, and all
contained in the ball of radius `5/2`. A volume argument gives `s.card * (1/2)^dim ≤ (5/2)^dim`,
i.e., `s.card ≤ 5^dim`. -/
borelize E
let μ : Measure E := Measure.addHaar
let δ : ℝ := (1 : ℝ) / 2
let ρ : ℝ := (5 : ℝ) / 2
have ρpos : 0 < ρ := by norm_num
set A := ⋃ c ∈ s, ball (c : E) δ with hA
have D : Set.Pairwise (s : Set E) (Disjoint on fun c => ball (c : E) δ) := by
rintro c hc d hd hcd
apply ball_disjoint_ball
rw [dist_eq_norm]
convert h c hc d hd hcd
norm_num
have A_subset : A ⊆ ball (0 : E) ρ := by
refine iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => ?_
apply ball_subset_ball'
calc
δ + dist x 0 ≤ δ + 2 := by rw [dist_zero_right]; exact add_le_add le_rfl (hs x hx)
_ = 5 / 2 := by norm_num
have I :
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) :=
calc
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) = μ A := by
rw [hA, measure_biUnion_finset D fun c _ => measurableSet_ball]
have I : 0 < δ := by norm_num
simp only [div_pow, μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ I]
simp only [one_div, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ μ (ball (0 : E) ρ) := measure_mono A_subset
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
simp only [μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ ρpos]
have J : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) :=
(ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right (measure_ball_pos _ _ zero_lt_one).ne' measure_ball_lt_top.ne).1 I
have K : (s.card : ℝ) ≤ (5 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℝ E := by
have := ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (pow_nonneg ρpos.le _) J
simpa [ρ, δ, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow] using this
exact mod_cast K
theorem multiplicity_le : multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
apply csSup_le
· refine ⟨0, ⟨∅, by simp⟩⟩
· rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
theorem card_le_multiplicity {s : Finset E} (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by
apply le_csSup
· refine ⟨5 ^ finrank ℝ E, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
exact ⟨s, rfl, hs, h's⟩
variable (E)
/-- If `δ` is small enough, a `(1-δ)`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` also has cardinality
at most `multiplicity E`. -/
theorem exists_goodδ :
∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ δ < 1 ∧ ∀ s : Finset E, (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) →
(∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - δ ≤ ‖c - d‖) → s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by
classical
/- This follows from a compactness argument: otherwise, one could extract a converging
subsequence, to obtain a `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` with cardinality
`N = multiplicity E + 1`. To formalize this, we work with functions `Fin N → E`.
-/
by_contra! h
set N := multiplicity E + 1 with hN
have :
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧
Pairwise fun i j => 1 - δ ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
intro δ hδ
rcases lt_or_le δ 1 with (hδ' | hδ')
· rcases h δ hδ hδ' with ⟨s, hs, h's, s_card⟩
obtain ⟨f, f_inj, hfs⟩ : ∃ f : Fin N → E, Function.Injective f ∧ range f ⊆ ↑s := by
have : Fintype.card (Fin N) ≤ s.card := by simp only [Fintype.card_fin]; exact s_card
rcases Function.Embedding.exists_of_card_le_finset this with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f, f.injective, hf⟩
simp only [range_subset_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hfs
exact ⟨f, fun i => hs _ (hfs i), fun i j hij => h's _ (hfs i) _ (hfs j) (f_inj.ne hij)⟩
· exact
⟨fun _ => 0, by simp, fun i j _ => by
simpa only [norm_zero, sub_nonpos, sub_self]⟩
-- For `δ > 0`, `F δ` is a function from `Fin N` to the ball of radius `2` for which two points
-- in the image are separated by `1 - δ`.
choose! F hF using this
-- Choose a converging subsequence when `δ → 0`.
have : ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
obtain ⟨u, _, zero_lt_u, hu⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → u n < u m) ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have A : ∀ n, F (u n) ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2 := by
intro n
simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right,
(hF (u n) (zero_lt_u n)).left, forall_const]
obtain ⟨f, fmem, φ, φ_mono, hf⟩ :
∃ f ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2,
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ Tendsto ((F ∘ u) ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 f) :=
IsCompact.tendsto_subseq (isCompact_closedBall _ _) A
refine ⟨f, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
· simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right] at fmem
exact fmem i
· have A : Tendsto (fun n => ‖F (u (φ n)) i - F (u (φ n)) j‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖f i - f j‖) :=
((hf.apply_nhds i).sub (hf.apply_nhds j)).norm
have B : Tendsto (fun n => 1 - u (φ n)) atTop (𝓝 (1 - 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.sub (hu.comp φ_mono.tendsto_atTop)
rw [sub_zero] at B
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' B A fun n => (hF (u (φ n)) (zero_lt_u _)).2 hij
rcases this with ⟨f, hf, h'f⟩
-- the range of `f` contradicts the definition of `multiplicity E`.
have finj : Function.Injective f := by
intro i j hij
by_contra h
have : 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := h'f h
simp only [hij, norm_zero, sub_self] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ (this.trans_lt zero_lt_one)
let s := Finset.image f Finset.univ
have s_card : s.card = N := by rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ finj]; exact Finset.card_fin N
have hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2 := by
simp only [s, hf, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_const, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ,
Finset.mem_image, true_and]
have h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖ := by
simp only [s, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_image,
Ne, exists_true_left, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_true_left, true_and]
intro i j hij
have : i ≠ j := fun h => by rw [h] at hij; exact hij rfl
exact h'f this
have : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := card_le_multiplicity hs h's
rw [s_card, hN] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ ((Nat.lt_succ_self (multiplicity E)).trans_le this)
/-- A small positive number such that any `1 - δ`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` has
cardinality at most `Besicovitch.multiplicity E`. -/
def goodδ : ℝ :=
(exists_goodδ E).choose
theorem goodδ_lt_one : goodδ E < 1 :=
(exists_goodδ E).choose_spec.2.1
/-- A number `τ > 1`, but chosen close enough to `1` so that the construction in the Besicovitch
covering theorem using this parameter `τ` will give the smallest possible number of covering
families. -/
def goodτ : ℝ :=
1 + goodδ E / 4
theorem one_lt_goodτ : 1 < goodτ E := by
dsimp [goodτ, goodδ]; linarith [(exists_goodδ E).choose_spec.1]
variable {E}
theorem card_le_multiplicity_of_δ {s : Finset E} (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ multiplicity E :=
(Classical.choose_spec (exists_goodδ E)).2.2 s hs h's
theorem le_multiplicity_of_δ_of_fin {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → E) (h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2)
(h' : Pairwise fun i j => 1 - goodδ E ≤ ‖f i - f j‖) : n ≤ multiplicity E := by
| classical
have finj : Function.Injective f := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/BesicovitchVectorSpace.lean | 266 | 267 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Martin Dvorak. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Language
/-!
# Context-Free Grammars
This file contains the definition of a context-free grammar, which is a grammar that has a single
nonterminal symbol on the left-hand side of each rule.
We restrict nonterminals of a context-free grammar to `Type` because universe polymorphism would be
cumbersome and unnecessary; we can always restrict a context-free grammar to the finitely many
nonterminal symbols that are referred to by its finitely many rules.
## Main definitions
* `ContextFreeGrammar`: A context-free grammar.
* `ContextFreeGrammar.language`: A language generated by a given context-free grammar.
## Main theorems
* `Language.IsContextFree.reverse`: The class of context-free languages is closed under reversal.
-/
open Function
/-- Rule that rewrites a single nonterminal to any string (a list of symbols). -/
@[ext]
structure ContextFreeRule (T N : Type*) where
/-- Input nonterminal a.k.a. left-hand side. -/
input : N
/-- Output string a.k.a. right-hand side. -/
output : List (Symbol T N)
deriving DecidableEq, Repr
/-- Context-free grammar that generates words over the alphabet `T` (a type of terminals). -/
structure ContextFreeGrammar (T : Type*) where
/-- Type of nonterminals. -/
NT : Type
/-- Initial nonterminal. -/
initial : NT
/-- Rewrite rules. -/
rules : Finset (ContextFreeRule T NT)
variable {T : Type*}
namespace ContextFreeRule
variable {N : Type*} {r : ContextFreeRule T N} {u v : List (Symbol T N)}
/-- Inductive definition of a single application of a given context-free rule `r` to a string `u`;
`r.Rewrites u v` means that the `r` sends `u` to `v` (there may be multiple such strings `v`). -/
inductive Rewrites (r : ContextFreeRule T N) : List (Symbol T N) → List (Symbol T N) → Prop
/-- The replacement is at the start of the remaining string. -/
| head (s : List (Symbol T N)) :
r.Rewrites (Symbol.nonterminal r.input :: s) (r.output ++ s)
/-- There is a replacement later in the string. -/
| cons (x : Symbol T N) {s₁ s₂ : List (Symbol T N)} (hrs : Rewrites r s₁ s₂) :
r.Rewrites (x :: s₁) (x :: s₂)
lemma Rewrites.exists_parts (hr : r.Rewrites u v) :
∃ p q : List (Symbol T N),
u = p ++ [Symbol.nonterminal r.input] ++ q ∧ v = p ++ r.output ++ q := by
induction hr with
| head s =>
use [], s
simp
| cons x _ ih =>
rcases ih with ⟨p', q', rfl, rfl⟩
use x :: p', q'
simp
lemma Rewrites.input_output : r.Rewrites [.nonterminal r.input] r.output := by
simpa using head []
lemma rewrites_of_exists_parts (r : ContextFreeRule T N) (p q : List (Symbol T N)) :
r.Rewrites (p ++ [Symbol.nonterminal r.input] ++ q) (p ++ r.output ++ q) := by
induction p with
| nil => exact Rewrites.head q
| cons d l ih => exact Rewrites.cons d ih
/-- Rule `r` rewrites string `u` is to string `v` iff they share both a prefix `p` and postfix `q`
such that the remaining middle part of `u` is the input of `r` and the remaining middle part
of `u` is the output of `r`. -/
theorem rewrites_iff :
r.Rewrites u v ↔ ∃ p q : List (Symbol T N),
u = p ++ [Symbol.nonterminal r.input] ++ q ∧ v = p ++ r.output ++ q :=
⟨Rewrites.exists_parts, by rintro ⟨p, q, rfl, rfl⟩; apply rewrites_of_exists_parts⟩
lemma Rewrites.nonterminal_input_mem : r.Rewrites u v → .nonterminal r.input ∈ u := by
simp +contextual [rewrites_iff, List.append_assoc]
/-- Add extra prefix to context-free rewriting. -/
lemma Rewrites.append_left (hvw : r.Rewrites u v) (p : List (Symbol T N)) :
r.Rewrites (p ++ u) (p ++ v) := by
rw [rewrites_iff] at *
rcases hvw with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
use p ++ x, y
simp_all
/-- Add extra postfix to context-free rewriting. -/
lemma Rewrites.append_right (hvw : r.Rewrites u v) (p : List (Symbol T N)) :
r.Rewrites (u ++ p) (v ++ p) := by
rw [rewrites_iff] at *
rcases hvw with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
use x, y ++ p
simp_all
end ContextFreeRule
namespace ContextFreeGrammar
/-- Given a context-free grammar `g` and strings `u` and `v`
`g.Produces u v` means that one step of a context-free transformation by a rule from `g` sends
`u` to `v`. -/
def Produces (g : ContextFreeGrammar T) (u v : List (Symbol T g.NT)) : Prop :=
∃ r ∈ g.rules, r.Rewrites u v
/-- Given a context-free grammar `g` and strings `u` and `v`
`g.Derives u v` means that `g` can transform `u` to `v` in some number of rewriting steps. -/
abbrev Derives (g : ContextFreeGrammar T) :
List (Symbol T g.NT) → List (Symbol T g.NT) → Prop :=
Relation.ReflTransGen g.Produces
/-- Given a context-free grammar `g` and a string `s`
`g.Generates s` means that `g` can transform its initial nonterminal to `s` in some number of
rewriting steps. -/
def Generates (g : ContextFreeGrammar T) (s : List (Symbol T g.NT)) : Prop :=
g.Derives [Symbol.nonterminal g.initial] s
/-- The language (set of words) that can be generated by a given context-free grammar `g`. -/
def language (g : ContextFreeGrammar T) : Language T :=
{ w : List T | g.Generates (w.map Symbol.terminal) }
/-- A given word `w` belongs to the language generated by a given context-free grammar `g` iff
`g` can derive the word `w` (wrapped as a string) from the initial nonterminal of `g` in some
number of steps. -/
@[simp]
lemma mem_language_iff (g : ContextFreeGrammar T) (w : List T) :
w ∈ g.language ↔ g.Derives [Symbol.nonterminal g.initial] (w.map Symbol.terminal) := by
rfl
variable {g : ContextFreeGrammar T}
@[refl]
lemma Derives.refl (w : List (Symbol T g.NT)) : g.Derives w w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.refl
lemma Produces.single {v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} (hvw : g.Produces v w) : g.Derives v w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.single hvw
@[trans]
lemma Derives.trans {u v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} (huv : g.Derives u v) (hvw : g.Derives v w) :
g.Derives u w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.trans huv hvw
lemma Derives.trans_produces {u v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(huv : g.Derives u v) (hvw : g.Produces v w) :
g.Derives u w :=
huv.trans hvw.single
lemma Produces.trans_derives {u v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(huv : g.Produces u v) (hvw : g.Derives v w) :
g.Derives u w :=
huv.single.trans hvw
lemma Derives.eq_or_head {u w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} (huw : g.Derives u w) :
u = w ∨ ∃ v : List (Symbol T g.NT), g.Produces u v ∧ g.Derives v w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_head huw
lemma derives_iff_eq_or_head {u w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} :
g.Derives u w ↔ u = w ∨ ∃ v : List (Symbol T g.NT), g.Produces u v ∧ g.Derives v w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_head_iff
lemma Derives.eq_or_tail {u w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} (huw : g.Derives u w) :
w = u ∨ ∃ v : List (Symbol T g.NT), g.Derives u v ∧ g.Produces v w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_tail huw
lemma derives_iff_eq_or_tail {u w : List (Symbol T g.NT)} :
g.Derives u w ↔ w = u ∨ ∃ v : List (Symbol T g.NT), g.Derives u v ∧ g.Produces v w :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff g.Produces u w
/-- Add extra prefix to context-free producing. -/
lemma Produces.append_left {v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(hvw : g.Produces v w) (p : List (Symbol T g.NT)) :
g.Produces (p ++ v) (p ++ w) :=
match hvw with | ⟨r, hrmem, hrvw⟩ => ⟨r, hrmem, hrvw.append_left p⟩
/-- Add extra postfix to context-free producing. -/
lemma Produces.append_right {v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(hvw : g.Produces v w) (p : List (Symbol T g.NT)) :
g.Produces (v ++ p) (w ++ p) :=
match hvw with | ⟨r, hrmem, hrvw⟩ => ⟨r, hrmem, hrvw.append_right p⟩
/-- Add extra prefix to context-free deriving. -/
lemma Derives.append_left {v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(hvw : g.Derives v w) (p : List (Symbol T g.NT)) :
g.Derives (p ++ v) (p ++ w) := by
induction hvw with
| refl => rfl
| tail _ last ih => exact ih.trans_produces <| last.append_left p
/-- Add extra postfix to context-free deriving. -/
lemma Derives.append_right {v w : List (Symbol T g.NT)}
(hvw : g.Derives v w) (p : List (Symbol T g.NT)) :
g.Derives (v ++ p) (w ++ p) := by
induction hvw with
| refl => rfl
| tail _ last ih => exact ih.trans_produces <| last.append_right p
lemma Produces.exists_nonterminal_input_mem {u v : List (Symbol T g.NT)} (hguv : g.Produces u v) :
∃ r ∈ g.rules, .nonterminal r.input ∈ u := by
obtain ⟨w, l, r⟩ := hguv
exact ⟨w, l, r.nonterminal_input_mem⟩
lemma derives_nonterminal {t : g.NT} (hgt : ∀ r ∈ g.rules, r.input ≠ t)
(s : List (Symbol T g.NT)) (hs : s ≠ [.nonterminal t]) :
¬g.Derives [.nonterminal t] s := by
rw [derives_iff_eq_or_head]
push_neg
refine ⟨hs.symm, fun _ hx ↦ ?_⟩
have hxr := hx.exists_nonterminal_input_mem
simp_rw [List.mem_singleton, Symbol.nonterminal.injEq] at hxr
tauto
lemma language_eq_zero_of_forall_input_ne_initial (hg : ∀ r ∈ g.rules, r.input ≠ g.initial) :
g.language = 0 := by ext; simp +contextual [derives_nonterminal, hg]
end ContextFreeGrammar
/-- Context-free languages are defined by context-free grammars. -/
def Language.IsContextFree (L : Language T) : Prop :=
∃ g : ContextFreeGrammar T, g.language = L
section closure_reversal
|
namespace ContextFreeRule
variable {N : Type*} {r : ContextFreeRule T N} {u v : List (Symbol T N)}
/-- Rules for a grammar for a reversed language. -/
| Mathlib/Computability/ContextFreeGrammar.lean | 236 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.PartialEquiv
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# Partial homeomorphisms
This file defines homeomorphisms between open subsets of topological spaces. An element `e` of
`PartialHomeomorph X Y` is an extension of `PartialEquiv X Y`, i.e., it is a pair of functions
`e.toFun` and `e.invFun`, inverse of each other on the sets `e.source` and `e.target`.
Additionally, we require that these sets are open, and that the functions are continuous on them.
Equivalently, they are homeomorphisms there.
As in equivs, we register a coercion to functions, and we use `e x` and `e.symm x` throughout
instead of `e.toFun x` and `e.invFun x`.
## Main definitions
* `Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph`: associating a partial homeomorphism to a homeomorphism, with
`source = target = Set.univ`;
* `PartialHomeomorph.symm`: the inverse of a partial homeomorphism
* `PartialHomeomorph.trans`: the composition of two partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.refl`: the identity partial homeomorphism
* `PartialHomeomorph.const`: a partial homeomorphism which is a constant map,
whose source and target are necessarily singleton sets
* `PartialHomeomorph.ofSet`: the identity on a set `s`
* `PartialHomeomorph.restr s`: restrict a partial homeomorphism `e` to `e.source ∩ interior s`
* `PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource`: equivalence relation describing the "right" notion of equality
for partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.prod`: the product of two partial homeomorphisms,
as a partial homeomorphism on the product space
* `PartialHomeomorph.pi`: the product of a finite family of partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.disjointUnion`: combine two partial homeomorphisms with disjoint sources
and disjoint targets
* `PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding`: extend a partial homeomorphism `X → Y`
under an open embedding `X → X'`, to a partial homeomorphism `X' → Z`.
(This is used to define the disjoint union of charted spaces.)
## Implementation notes
Most statements are copied from their `PartialEquiv` versions, although some care is required
especially when restricting to subsets, as these should be open subsets.
For design notes, see `PartialEquiv.lean`.
### Local coding conventions
If a lemma deals with the intersection of a set with either source or target of a `PartialEquiv`,
then it should use `e.source ∩ s` or `e.target ∩ t`, not `s ∩ e.source` or `t ∩ e.target`.
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
variable {X X' : Type*} {Y Y' : Type*} {Z Z' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X'] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y']
[TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace Z']
/-- Partial homeomorphisms, defined on open subsets of the space -/
structure PartialHomeomorph (X : Type*) (Y : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] extends PartialEquiv X Y where
open_source : IsOpen source
open_target : IsOpen target
continuousOn_toFun : ContinuousOn toFun source
continuousOn_invFun : ContinuousOn invFun target
namespace PartialHomeomorph
variable (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y)
/-! Basic properties; inverse (symm instance) -/
section Basic
/-- Coercion of a partial homeomorphisms to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is
actually `e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`.
While we may want to switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' : X → Y := e.toFun
/-- Coercion of a `PartialHomeomorph` to function.
Note that a `PartialHomeomorph` is not `DFunLike`. -/
instance : CoeFun (PartialHomeomorph X Y) fun _ => X → Y :=
⟨fun e => e.toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse of a partial homeomorphism -/
@[symm]
protected def symm : PartialHomeomorph Y X where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquiv.symm
open_source := e.open_target
open_target := e.open_source
continuousOn_toFun := e.continuousOn_invFun
continuousOn_invFun := e.continuousOn_toFun
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : X → Y := e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : Y → X := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections PartialHomeomorph (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
protected theorem continuousOn : ContinuousOn e e.source :=
e.continuousOn_toFun
theorem continuousOn_symm : ContinuousOn e.symm e.target :=
e.continuousOn_invFun
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (a b c d) : (PartialHomeomorph.mk e a b c d : X → Y) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe_symm (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (a b c d) :
((PartialHomeomorph.mk e a b c d).symm : Y → X) = e.symm :=
rfl
theorem toPartialEquiv_injective :
Injective (toPartialEquiv : PartialHomeomorph X Y → PartialEquiv X Y)
| ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
/- Register a few simp lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts the application of a local
homeomorphism in its normal form, i.e., in terms of its coercion to a function. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : e.toFun = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem invFun_eq_coe (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe : (e.toPartialEquiv : X → Y) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe_symm : (e.toPartialEquiv.symm : Y → X) = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem map_source {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e x ∈ e.target :=
e.map_source' h
/-- Variant of `map_source`, stated for images of subsets of `source`. -/
lemma map_source'' : e '' e.source ⊆ e.target :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, hex⟩ ↦ mem_of_eq_of_mem (id hex.symm) (e.map_source' hx)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem map_target {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e.symm x ∈ e.source :=
e.map_target' h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem left_inv {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.left_inv' h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem right_inv {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.right_inv' h
theorem eq_symm_apply {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : y ∈ e.target) :
x = e.symm y ↔ e x = y :=
e.toPartialEquiv.eq_symm_apply hx hy
protected theorem mapsTo : MapsTo e e.source e.target := fun _ => e.map_source
protected theorem symm_mapsTo : MapsTo e.symm e.target e.source :=
e.symm.mapsTo
protected theorem leftInvOn : LeftInvOn e.symm e e.source := fun _ => e.left_inv
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn e.symm e e.target := fun _ => e.right_inv
protected theorem invOn : InvOn e.symm e e.source e.target :=
⟨e.leftInvOn, e.rightInvOn⟩
protected theorem injOn : InjOn e e.source :=
e.leftInvOn.injOn
protected theorem bijOn : BijOn e e.source e.target :=
e.invOn.bijOn e.mapsTo e.symm_mapsTo
protected theorem surjOn : SurjOn e e.source e.target :=
e.bijOn.surjOn
end Basic
/-- Interpret a `Homeomorph` as a `PartialHomeomorph` by restricting it
to an open set `s` in the domain and to `t` in the codomain. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied apply symm_apply toPartialEquiv,
simps! -isSimp source target]
def _root_.Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorphOfImageEq (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s)
(t : Set Y) (h : e '' s = t) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquivOfImageEq s t h
open_source := hs
open_target := by simpa [← h]
continuousOn_toFun := e.continuous.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := e.symm.continuous.continuousOn
/-- A homeomorphism induces a partial homeomorphism on the whole space -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg)]
def _root_.Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph (e : X ≃ₜ Y) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
e.toPartialHomeomorphOfImageEq univ isOpen_univ univ <| by rw [image_univ, e.surjective.range_eq]
/-- Replace `toPartialEquiv` field to provide better definitional equalities. -/
def replaceEquiv (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (e' : PartialEquiv X Y) (h : e.toPartialEquiv = e') :
PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e'
open_source := h ▸ e.open_source
open_target := h ▸ e.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := h ▸ e.continuousOn_toFun
continuousOn_invFun := h ▸ e.continuousOn_invFun
theorem replaceEquiv_eq_self (e' : PartialEquiv X Y)
(h : e.toPartialEquiv = e') : e.replaceEquiv e' h = e := by
cases e
subst e'
rfl
theorem source_preimage_target : e.source ⊆ e ⁻¹' e.target :=
e.mapsTo
theorem eventually_left_inverse {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e.symm (e y) = y :=
(e.open_source.eventually_mem hx).mono e.left_inv'
theorem eventually_left_inverse' {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e.symm x), e.symm (e y) = y :=
e.eventually_left_inverse (e.map_target hx)
theorem eventually_right_inverse {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e (e.symm y) = y :=
(e.open_target.eventually_mem hx).mono e.right_inv'
theorem eventually_right_inverse' {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), e (e.symm y) = y :=
e.eventually_right_inverse (e.map_source hx)
theorem eventually_ne_nhdsWithin {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[≠] x, e x' ≠ e x :=
eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <|
(e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun x' hx' =>
mt fun h => by rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← e.left_inv hx, ← h, hx']
theorem nhdsWithin_source_inter {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set X) : 𝓝[e.source ∩ s] x = 𝓝[s] x :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| IsOpen.mem_nhds e.open_source hx)
theorem nhdsWithin_target_inter {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) (s : Set Y) : 𝓝[e.target ∩ s] x = 𝓝[s] x :=
e.symm.nhdsWithin_source_inter hx s
theorem image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage {s : Set X} (h : s ⊆ e.source) :
e '' s = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage h
theorem image_source_inter_eq' (s : Set X) : e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_inter_eq' s
theorem image_source_inter_eq (s : Set X) :
e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e.source ∩ s) :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_inter_eq s
theorem symm_image_eq_source_inter_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : s ⊆ e.target) :
e.symm '' s = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s :=
e.symm.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage h
theorem symm_image_target_inter_eq (s : Set Y) :
e.symm '' (e.target ∩ s) = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ s) :=
e.symm.image_source_inter_eq _
theorem source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage (s : Set X) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = e.source ∩ s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage s
theorem target_inter_inv_preimage_preimage (s : Set Y) :
e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = e.target ∩ s :=
e.symm.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage _
theorem source_inter_preimage_target_inter (s : Set Y) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ s) = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.source_inter_preimage_target_inter s
theorem image_source_eq_target : e '' e.source = e.target :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target
theorem symm_image_target_eq_source : e.symm '' e.target = e.source :=
e.symm.image_source_eq_target
/-- Two partial homeomorphisms are equal when they have equal `toFun`, `invFun` and `source`.
It is not sufficient to have equal `toFun` and `source`, as this only determines `invFun` on
the target. This would only be true for a weaker notion of equality, arguably the right one,
called `EqOnSource`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext (e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x)
(hinv : ∀ x, e.symm x = e'.symm x) (hs : e.source = e'.source) : e = e' :=
toPartialEquiv_injective (PartialEquiv.ext h hinv hs)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_toPartialEquiv : e.symm.toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.symm :=
rfl
-- The following lemmas are already simp via `PartialEquiv`
theorem symm_source : e.symm.source = e.target :=
rfl
theorem symm_target : e.symm.target = e.source :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective
(PartialHomeomorph.symm : PartialHomeomorph X Y → PartialHomeomorph Y X) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
/-- A partial homeomorphism is continuous at any point of its source -/
protected theorem continuousAt {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : ContinuousAt e x :=
(e.continuousOn x h).continuousAt (e.open_source.mem_nhds h)
/-- A partial homeomorphism inverse is continuous at any point of its target -/
theorem continuousAt_symm {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : ContinuousAt e.symm x :=
e.symm.continuousAt h
theorem tendsto_symm {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : Tendsto e.symm (𝓝 (e x)) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, e.left_inv hx] using e.continuousAt_symm (e.map_source hx)
theorem map_nhds_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : map e (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (e x) :=
le_antisymm (e.continuousAt hx) <|
le_map_of_right_inverse (e.eventually_right_inverse' hx) (e.tendsto_symm hx)
theorem symm_map_nhds_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : map e.symm (𝓝 (e x)) = 𝓝 x :=
(e.symm.map_nhds_eq <| e.map_source hx).trans <| by rw [e.left_inv hx]
theorem image_mem_nhds {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : e '' s ∈ 𝓝 (e x) :=
e.map_nhds_eq hx ▸ Filter.image_mem_map hs
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set X) :
map e (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e x :=
calc
map e (𝓝[s] x) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] x) :=
congr_arg (map e) (e.nhdsWithin_source_inter hx _).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e x :=
(e.leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq (e.left_inv hx)
(e.continuousAt_symm (e.map_source hx)).continuousWithinAt
(e.continuousAt hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set Y) :
map e (𝓝[e ⁻¹' s] x) = 𝓝[s] e x := by
rw [e.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, e.image_source_inter_eq', e.target_inter_inv_preimage_preimage,
e.nhdsWithin_target_inter (e.map_source hx)]
theorem eventually_nhds {x : X} (p : Y → Prop) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p (e x) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [e.map_nhds_eq hx]) eventually_map
theorem eventually_nhds' {x : X} (p : X → Prop) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), p (e.symm y)) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x := by
rw [e.eventually_nhds _ hx]
refine eventually_congr ((e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun y hy => ?_)
rw [hy]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin {x : X} (p : Y → Prop) {s : Set X}
(hx : x ∈ e.source) : (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[e.symm ⁻¹' s] e x, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x, p (e x) := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ eventually_map
rw [e.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, e.image_source_inter_eq', e.nhdsWithin_target_inter (e.mapsTo hx)]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin' {x : X} (p : X → Prop) {s : Set X}
(hx : x ∈ e.source) : (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[e.symm ⁻¹' s] e x, p (e.symm y)) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x, p x := by
rw [e.eventually_nhdsWithin _ hx]
refine eventually_congr <|
(eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds <| e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy]
/-- This lemma is useful in the manifold library in the case that `e` is a chart. It states that
locally around `e x` the set `e.symm ⁻¹' s` is the same as the set intersected with the target
of `e` and some other neighborhood of `f x` (which will be the source of a chart on `Z`). -/
theorem preimage_eventuallyEq_target_inter_preimage_inter {e : PartialHomeomorph X Y} {s : Set X}
{t : Set Z} {x : X} {f : X → Z} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hxe : x ∈ e.source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) :
e.symm ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[𝓝 (e x)] (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) : Set Y) := by
rw [eventuallyEq_set, e.eventually_nhds _ hxe]
filter_upwards [e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe,
mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually.mp (hf.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin ht)]
intro y hy hyu
simp_rw [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_inter_iff, e.mapsTo hy, true_and, iff_self_and,
e.left_inv hy, iff_true_intro hyu]
theorem isOpen_inter_preimage {s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen (e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s) :=
e.continuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_source hs
theorem isOpen_inter_preimage_symm {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s) :=
e.symm.continuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_target hs
/-- A partial homeomorphism is an open map on its source:
the image of an open subset of the source is open. -/
lemma isOpen_image_of_subset_source {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) (hse : s ⊆ e.source) :
IsOpen (e '' s) := by
rw [(image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage (e := e) hse)]
exact e.continuousOn_invFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_target hs
/-- The image of the restriction of an open set to the source is open. -/
theorem isOpen_image_source_inter {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (e '' (e.source ∩ s)) :=
e.isOpen_image_of_subset_source (e.open_source.inter hs) inter_subset_left
/-- The inverse of a partial homeomorphism `e` is an open map on `e.target`. -/
lemma isOpen_image_symm_of_subset_target {t : Set Y} (ht : IsOpen t) (hte : t ⊆ e.target) :
IsOpen (e.symm '' t) :=
isOpen_image_of_subset_source e.symm ht (e.symm_source ▸ hte)
lemma isOpen_symm_image_iff_of_subset_target {t : Set Y} (hs : t ⊆ e.target) :
IsOpen (e.symm '' t) ↔ IsOpen t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ e.symm.isOpen_image_of_subset_source h hs⟩
have hs' : e.symm '' t ⊆ e.source := by
rw [e.symm_image_eq_source_inter_preimage hs]
apply Set.inter_subset_left
rw [← e.image_symm_image_of_subset_target hs]
exact e.isOpen_image_of_subset_source h hs'
theorem isOpen_image_iff_of_subset_source {s : Set X} (hs : s ⊆ e.source) :
IsOpen (e '' s) ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← e.symm.isOpen_symm_image_iff_of_subset_target hs, e.symm_symm]
section IsImage
/-!
### `PartialHomeomorph.IsImage` relation
We say that `t : Set Y` is an image of `s : Set X` under a partial homeomorphism `e` if any of the
following equivalent conditions hold:
* `e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ t`;
* `e.source ∩ e ⁻¹ t = e.source ∩ s`;
* `∀ x ∈ e.source, e x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s` (this one is used in the definition).
This definition is a restatement of `PartialEquiv.IsImage` for partial homeomorphisms.
In this section we transfer API about `PartialEquiv.IsImage` to partial homeomorphisms and
add a few `PartialHomeomorph`-specific lemmas like `PartialHomeomorph.IsImage.closure`.
-/
/-- We say that `t : Set Y` is an image of `s : Set X` under a partial homeomorphism `e`
if any of the following equivalent conditions hold:
* `e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ t`;
* `e.source ∩ e ⁻¹ t = e.source ∩ s`;
* `∀ x ∈ e.source, e x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s` (this one is used in the definition).
-/
def IsImage (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ e.source → (e x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s)
namespace IsImage
variable {e} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
theorem toPartialEquiv (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.toPartialEquiv.IsImage s t :=
h
theorem apply_mem_iff (h : e.IsImage s t) (hx : x ∈ e.source) : e x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
h hx
protected theorem symm (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.symm.IsImage t s :=
h.toPartialEquiv.symm
theorem symm_apply_mem_iff (h : e.IsImage s t) (hy : y ∈ e.target) : e.symm y ∈ s ↔ y ∈ t :=
h.symm hy
@[simp]
theorem symm_iff : e.symm.IsImage t s ↔ e.IsImage s t :=
⟨fun h => h.symm, fun h => h.symm⟩
protected theorem mapsTo (h : e.IsImage s t) : MapsTo e (e.source ∩ s) (e.target ∩ t) :=
h.toPartialEquiv.mapsTo
theorem symm_mapsTo (h : e.IsImage s t) : MapsTo e.symm (e.target ∩ t) (e.source ∩ s) :=
h.symm.mapsTo
theorem image_eq (h : e.IsImage s t) : e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ t :=
h.toPartialEquiv.image_eq
theorem symm_image_eq (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.symm '' (e.target ∩ t) = e.source ∩ s :=
h.symm.image_eq
theorem iff_preimage_eq : e.IsImage s t ↔ e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' t = e.source ∩ s :=
PartialEquiv.IsImage.iff_preimage_eq
alias ⟨preimage_eq, of_preimage_eq⟩ := iff_preimage_eq
theorem iff_symm_preimage_eq : e.IsImage s t ↔ e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s = e.target ∩ t :=
symm_iff.symm.trans iff_preimage_eq
alias ⟨symm_preimage_eq, of_symm_preimage_eq⟩ := iff_symm_preimage_eq
theorem iff_symm_preimage_eq' :
e.IsImage s t ↔ e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ t := by
rw [iff_symm_preimage_eq, ← image_source_inter_eq, ← image_source_inter_eq']
alias ⟨symm_preimage_eq', of_symm_preimage_eq'⟩ := iff_symm_preimage_eq'
theorem iff_preimage_eq' : e.IsImage s t ↔ e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ t) = e.source ∩ s :=
symm_iff.symm.trans iff_symm_preimage_eq'
alias ⟨preimage_eq', of_preimage_eq'⟩ := iff_preimage_eq'
theorem of_image_eq (h : e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ t) : e.IsImage s t :=
PartialEquiv.IsImage.of_image_eq h
theorem of_symm_image_eq (h : e.symm '' (e.target ∩ t) = e.source ∩ s) : e.IsImage s t :=
PartialEquiv.IsImage.of_symm_image_eq h
protected theorem compl (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.IsImage sᶜ tᶜ := fun _ hx => (h hx).not
protected theorem inter {s' t'} (h : e.IsImage s t) (h' : e.IsImage s' t') :
e.IsImage (s ∩ s') (t ∩ t') := fun _ hx => (h hx).and (h' hx)
protected theorem union {s' t'} (h : e.IsImage s t) (h' : e.IsImage s' t') :
e.IsImage (s ∪ s') (t ∪ t') := fun _ hx => (h hx).or (h' hx)
protected theorem diff {s' t'} (h : e.IsImage s t) (h' : e.IsImage s' t') :
e.IsImage (s \ s') (t \ t') :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem leftInvOn_piecewise {e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)]
[∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] (h : e.IsImage s t) (h' : e'.IsImage s t) :
LeftInvOn (t.piecewise e.symm e'.symm) (s.piecewise e e') (s.ite e.source e'.source) :=
h.toPartialEquiv.leftInvOn_piecewise h'
theorem inter_eq_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn {e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e.IsImage s t)
(h' : e'.IsImage s t) (hs : e.source ∩ s = e'.source ∩ s) (Heq : EqOn e e' (e.source ∩ s)) :
e.target ∩ t = e'.target ∩ t :=
h.toPartialEquiv.inter_eq_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn h' hs Heq
theorem symm_eqOn_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn {e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e.IsImage s t)
(hs : e.source ∩ s = e'.source ∩ s) (Heq : EqOn e e' (e.source ∩ s)) :
EqOn e.symm e'.symm (e.target ∩ t) :=
h.toPartialEquiv.symm_eq_on_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn hs Heq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (h : e.IsImage s t) (hx : x ∈ e.source) : map e (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[t] e x := by
rw [e.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, h.image_eq, e.nhdsWithin_target_inter (e.map_source hx)]
protected theorem closure (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.IsImage (closure s) (closure t) := fun x hx => by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, ← h.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, map_neBot_iff]
protected theorem interior (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.IsImage (interior s) (interior t) := by
simpa only [closure_compl, compl_compl] using h.compl.closure.compl
protected theorem frontier (h : e.IsImage s t) : e.IsImage (frontier s) (frontier t) :=
h.closure.diff h.interior
theorem isOpen_iff (h : e.IsImage s t) : IsOpen (e.source ∩ s) ↔ IsOpen (e.target ∩ t) :=
⟨fun hs => h.symm_preimage_eq' ▸ e.symm.isOpen_inter_preimage hs, fun hs =>
h.preimage_eq' ▸ e.isOpen_inter_preimage hs⟩
/-- Restrict a `PartialHomeomorph` to a pair of corresponding open sets. -/
@[simps toPartialEquiv]
def restr (h : e.IsImage s t) (hs : IsOpen (e.source ∩ s)) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := h.toPartialEquiv.restr
open_source := hs
open_target := h.isOpen_iff.1 hs
continuousOn_toFun := e.continuousOn.mono inter_subset_left
continuousOn_invFun := e.symm.continuousOn.mono inter_subset_left
end IsImage
theorem isImage_source_target : e.IsImage e.source e.target :=
e.toPartialEquiv.isImage_source_target
theorem isImage_source_target_of_disjoint (e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y)
(hs : Disjoint e.source e'.source) (ht : Disjoint e.target e'.target) :
e.IsImage e'.source e'.target :=
e.toPartialEquiv.isImage_source_target_of_disjoint e'.toPartialEquiv hs ht
/-- Preimage of interior or interior of preimage coincide for partial homeomorphisms,
when restricted to the source. -/
theorem preimage_interior (s : Set Y) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' interior s = e.source ∩ interior (e ⁻¹' s) :=
(IsImage.of_preimage_eq rfl).interior.preimage_eq
theorem preimage_closure (s : Set Y) : e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' closure s = e.source ∩ closure (e ⁻¹' s) :=
(IsImage.of_preimage_eq rfl).closure.preimage_eq
theorem preimage_frontier (s : Set Y) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' frontier s = e.source ∩ frontier (e ⁻¹' s) :=
(IsImage.of_preimage_eq rfl).frontier.preimage_eq
end IsImage
/-- A `PartialEquiv` with continuous open forward map and open source is a `PartialHomeomorph`. -/
def ofContinuousOpenRestrict (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (hc : ContinuousOn e e.source)
(ho : IsOpenMap (e.source.restrict e)) (hs : IsOpen e.source) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e
open_source := hs
open_target := by simpa only [range_restrict, e.image_source_eq_target] using ho.isOpen_range
continuousOn_toFun := hc
continuousOn_invFun := e.image_source_eq_target ▸ ho.continuousOn_image_of_leftInvOn e.leftInvOn
/-- A `PartialEquiv` with continuous open forward map and open source is a `PartialHomeomorph`. -/
def ofContinuousOpen (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (hc : ContinuousOn e e.source) (ho : IsOpenMap e)
(hs : IsOpen e.source) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
ofContinuousOpenRestrict e hc (ho.restrict hs) hs
/-- Restricting a partial homeomorphism `e` to `e.source ∩ s` when `s` is open.
This is sometimes hard to use because of the openness assumption, but it has the advantage that
when it can be used then its `PartialEquiv` is defeq to `PartialEquiv.restr`. -/
protected def restrOpen (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
(@IsImage.of_symm_preimage_eq X Y _ _ e s (e.symm ⁻¹' s) rfl).restr
(IsOpen.inter e.open_source hs)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem restrOpen_toPartialEquiv (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) :
(e.restrOpen s hs).toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.restr s :=
rfl
-- Already simp via `PartialEquiv`
theorem restrOpen_source (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) : (e.restrOpen s hs).source = e.source ∩ s :=
rfl
/-- Restricting a partial homeomorphism `e` to `e.source ∩ interior s`. We use the interior to make
sure that the restriction is well defined whatever the set s, since partial homeomorphisms are by
definition defined on open sets. In applications where `s` is open, this coincides with the
restriction of partial equivalences -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg) apply symm_apply, simps! -isSimp source target]
protected def restr (s : Set X) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
e.restrOpen (interior s) isOpen_interior
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem restr_toPartialEquiv (s : Set X) :
(e.restr s).toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.restr (interior s) :=
rfl
theorem restr_source' (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) : (e.restr s).source = e.source ∩ s := by
rw [e.restr_source, hs.interior_eq]
theorem restr_toPartialEquiv' (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) :
(e.restr s).toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.restr s := by
rw [e.restr_toPartialEquiv, hs.interior_eq]
theorem restr_eq_of_source_subset {e : PartialHomeomorph X Y} {s : Set X} (h : e.source ⊆ s) :
e.restr s = e :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <| PartialEquiv.restr_eq_of_source_subset <|
interior_maximal h e.open_source
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem restr_univ {e : PartialHomeomorph X Y} : e.restr univ = e :=
restr_eq_of_source_subset (subset_univ _)
theorem restr_source_inter (s : Set X) : e.restr (e.source ∩ s) = e.restr s := by
refine PartialHomeomorph.ext _ _ (fun x => rfl) (fun x => rfl) ?_
simp [e.open_source.interior_eq, ← inter_assoc]
/-- The identity on the whole space as a partial homeomorphism. -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg) apply, simps! -isSimp source target]
protected def refl (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : PartialHomeomorph X X :=
(Homeomorph.refl X).toPartialHomeomorph
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem refl_partialEquiv : (PartialHomeomorph.refl X).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl X :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem refl_symm : (PartialHomeomorph.refl X).symm = PartialHomeomorph.refl X :=
rfl
/-! const: `PartialEquiv.const` as a partial homeomorphism -/
section const
variable {a : X} {b : Y}
/--
This is `PartialEquiv.single` as a partial homeomorphism: a constant map,
whose source and target are necessarily singleton sets.
-/
def const (ha : IsOpen {a}) (hb : IsOpen {b}) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.single a b
open_source := ha
open_target := hb
continuousOn_toFun := by simp
continuousOn_invFun := by simp
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma const_apply (ha : IsOpen {a}) (hb : IsOpen {b}) (x : X) : (const ha hb) x = b := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma const_source (ha : IsOpen {a}) (hb : IsOpen {b}) : (const ha hb).source = {a} := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma const_target (ha : IsOpen {a}) (hb : IsOpen {b}) : (const ha hb).target = {b} := rfl
end const
/-! ofSet: the identity on a set `s` -/
section ofSet
variable {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
/-- The identity partial equivalence on a set `s` -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg) apply, simps! -isSimp source target]
def ofSet (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s) : PartialHomeomorph X X where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.ofSet s
open_source := hs
open_target := hs
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_id.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_id.continuousOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem ofSet_toPartialEquiv : (ofSet s hs).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.ofSet s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem ofSet_symm : (ofSet s hs).symm = ofSet s hs :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem ofSet_univ_eq_refl : ofSet univ isOpen_univ = PartialHomeomorph.refl X := by ext <;> simp
end ofSet
/-! `trans`: composition of two partial homeomorphisms -/
section trans
variable (e' : PartialHomeomorph Y Z)
/-- Composition of two partial homeomorphisms when the target of the first and the source of
the second coincide. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply toPartialEquiv, simps! -isSimp source target]
protected def trans' (h : e.target = e'.source) : PartialHomeomorph X Z where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.trans' e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv h
open_source := e.open_source
open_target := e'.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := e'.continuousOn.comp e.continuousOn <| h ▸ e.mapsTo
continuousOn_invFun := e.continuousOn_symm.comp e'.continuousOn_symm <| h.symm ▸ e'.symm_mapsTo
/-- Composing two partial homeomorphisms, by restricting to the maximal domain where their
composition is well defined.
Within the `Manifold` namespace, there is the notation `e ≫ₕ f` for this. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans : PartialHomeomorph X Z :=
PartialHomeomorph.trans' (e.symm.restrOpen e'.source e'.open_source).symm
(e'.restrOpen e.target e.open_target) (by simp [inter_comm])
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trans_toPartialEquiv :
(e.trans e').toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.trans e'.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_trans : (e.trans e' : X → Z) = e' ∘ e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_trans_symm : ((e.trans e').symm : Z → X) = e.symm ∘ e'.symm :=
rfl
theorem trans_apply {x : X} : (e.trans e') x = e' (e x) :=
rfl
theorem trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm : (e.trans e').symm = e'.symm.trans e.symm := rfl
/- This could be considered as a simp lemma, but there are many situations where it makes something
simple into something more complicated. -/
theorem trans_source : (e.trans e').source = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' e'.source :=
PartialEquiv.trans_source e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv
theorem trans_source' : (e.trans e').source = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ e'.source) :=
PartialEquiv.trans_source' e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv
theorem trans_source'' : (e.trans e').source = e.symm '' (e.target ∩ e'.source) :=
PartialEquiv.trans_source'' e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv
theorem image_trans_source : e '' (e.trans e').source = e.target ∩ e'.source :=
PartialEquiv.image_trans_source e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv
theorem trans_target : (e.trans e').target = e'.target ∩ e'.symm ⁻¹' e.target :=
rfl
theorem trans_target' : (e.trans e').target = e'.target ∩ e'.symm ⁻¹' (e'.source ∩ e.target) :=
trans_source' e'.symm e.symm
theorem trans_target'' : (e.trans e').target = e' '' (e'.source ∩ e.target) :=
trans_source'' e'.symm e.symm
theorem inv_image_trans_target : e'.symm '' (e.trans e').target = e'.source ∩ e.target :=
image_trans_source e'.symm e.symm
theorem trans_assoc (e'' : PartialHomeomorph Z Z') :
(e.trans e').trans e'' = e.trans (e'.trans e'') :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <| e.1.trans_assoc _ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trans_refl : e.trans (PartialHomeomorph.refl Y) = e :=
toPartialEquiv_injective e.1.trans_refl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem refl_trans : (PartialHomeomorph.refl X).trans e = e :=
toPartialEquiv_injective e.1.refl_trans
theorem trans_ofSet {s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : e.trans (ofSet s hs) = e.restr (e ⁻¹' s) :=
PartialHomeomorph.ext _ _ (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) <| by
rw [trans_source, restr_source, ofSet_source, ← preimage_interior, hs.interior_eq]
theorem trans_of_set' {s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) :
e.trans (ofSet s hs) = e.restr (e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s) := by rw [trans_ofSet, restr_source_inter]
theorem ofSet_trans {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : (ofSet s hs).trans e = e.restr s :=
PartialHomeomorph.ext _ _ (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) <| by simp [hs.interior_eq, inter_comm]
theorem ofSet_trans' {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
(ofSet s hs).trans e = e.restr (e.source ∩ s) := by
rw [ofSet_trans, restr_source_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem ofSet_trans_ofSet {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) {s' : Set X} (hs' : IsOpen s') :
(ofSet s hs).trans (ofSet s' hs') = ofSet (s ∩ s') (IsOpen.inter hs hs') := by
rw [(ofSet s hs).trans_ofSet hs']
ext <;> simp [hs'.interior_eq]
theorem restr_trans (s : Set X) : (e.restr s).trans e' = (e.trans e').restr s :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <|
PartialEquiv.restr_trans e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv (interior s)
end trans
/-! `EqOnSource`: equivalence on their source -/
section EqOnSource
/-- `EqOnSource e e'` means that `e` and `e'` have the same source, and coincide there. They
should really be considered the same partial equivalence. -/
def EqOnSource (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : Prop :=
e.source = e'.source ∧ EqOn e e' e.source
theorem eqOnSource_iff (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) :
EqOnSource e e' ↔ PartialEquiv.EqOnSource e.toPartialEquiv e'.toPartialEquiv :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `EqOnSource` is an equivalence relation. -/
instance eqOnSourceSetoid : Setoid (PartialHomeomorph X Y) :=
{ PartialEquiv.eqOnSourceSetoid.comap toPartialEquiv with r := EqOnSource }
theorem eqOnSource_refl : e ≈ e := Setoid.refl _
/-- If two partial homeomorphisms are equivalent, so are their inverses. -/
theorem EqOnSource.symm' {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') : e.symm ≈ e'.symm :=
PartialEquiv.EqOnSource.symm' h
/-- Two equivalent partial homeomorphisms have the same source. -/
theorem EqOnSource.source_eq {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') : e.source = e'.source :=
h.1
/-- Two equivalent partial homeomorphisms have the same target. -/
theorem EqOnSource.target_eq {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') : e.target = e'.target :=
h.symm'.1
/-- Two equivalent partial homeomorphisms have coinciding `toFun` on the source -/
theorem EqOnSource.eqOn {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') : EqOn e e' e.source :=
h.2
/-- Two equivalent partial homeomorphisms have coinciding `invFun` on the target -/
theorem EqOnSource.symm_eqOn_target {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') :
EqOn e.symm e'.symm e.target :=
h.symm'.2
/-- Composition of partial homeomorphisms respects equivalence. -/
theorem EqOnSource.trans' {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} {f f' : PartialHomeomorph Y Z}
(he : e ≈ e') (hf : f ≈ f') : e.trans f ≈ e'.trans f' :=
PartialEquiv.EqOnSource.trans' he hf
/-- Restriction of partial homeomorphisms respects equivalence -/
theorem EqOnSource.restr {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (he : e ≈ e') (s : Set X) :
e.restr s ≈ e'.restr s :=
PartialEquiv.EqOnSource.restr he _
/-- Two equivalent partial homeomorphisms are equal when the source and target are `univ`. -/
theorem Set.EqOn.restr_eqOn_source {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y}
(h : EqOn e e' (e.source ∩ e'.source)) : e.restr e'.source ≈ e'.restr e.source := by
constructor
· rw [e'.restr_source' _ e.open_source]
rw [e.restr_source' _ e'.open_source]
exact Set.inter_comm _ _
· rw [e.restr_source' _ e'.open_source]
refine (EqOn.trans ?_ h).trans ?_ <;> simp only [mfld_simps, eqOn_refl]
/-- Composition of a partial homeomorphism and its inverse is equivalent to the restriction of the
identity to the source -/
theorem self_trans_symm : e.trans e.symm ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.source e.open_source :=
PartialEquiv.self_trans_symm _
theorem symm_trans_self : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
e.symm.self_trans_symm
theorem eq_of_eqOnSource_univ {e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y} (h : e ≈ e') (s : e.source = univ)
(t : e.target = univ) : e = e' :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <| PartialEquiv.eq_of_eqOnSource_univ _ _ h s t
end EqOnSource
/-! product of two partial homeomorphisms -/
section Prod
/-- The product of two partial homeomorphisms, as a partial homeomorphism on the product space. -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg) toPartialEquiv apply,
simps! -isSimp source target symm_apply]
def prod (eX : PartialHomeomorph X X') (eY : PartialHomeomorph Y Y') :
PartialHomeomorph (X × Y) (X' × Y') where
open_source := eX.open_source.prod eY.open_source
open_target := eX.open_target.prod eY.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := eX.continuousOn.prodMap eY.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := eX.continuousOn_symm.prodMap eY.continuousOn_symm
toPartialEquiv := eX.toPartialEquiv.prod eY.toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem prod_symm (eX : PartialHomeomorph X X') (eY : PartialHomeomorph Y Y') :
(eX.prod eY).symm = eX.symm.prod eY.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_prod_refl :
(PartialHomeomorph.refl X).prod (PartialHomeomorph.refl Y) = PartialHomeomorph.refl (X × Y) :=
PartialHomeomorph.ext _ _ (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) univ_prod_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem prod_trans (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (f : PartialHomeomorph Y Z)
(e' : PartialHomeomorph X' Y') (f' : PartialHomeomorph Y' Z') :
(e.prod e').trans (f.prod f') = (e.trans f).prod (e'.trans f') :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <| e.1.prod_trans ..
theorem prod_eq_prod_of_nonempty {eX eX' : PartialHomeomorph X X'} {eY eY' : PartialHomeomorph Y Y'}
(h : (eX.prod eY).source.Nonempty) : eX.prod eY = eX'.prod eY' ↔ eX = eX' ∧ eY = eY' := by
obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, -⟩ := id h
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
haveI : Nonempty X' := ⟨eX x⟩
haveI : Nonempty Y := ⟨y⟩
haveI : Nonempty Y' := ⟨eY y⟩
simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.ext_iff, prod_apply, prod_symm_apply, prod_source, Prod.ext_iff,
Set.prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h, forall_and, Prod.forall, forall_const,
and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem prod_eq_prod_of_nonempty'
{eX eX' : PartialHomeomorph X X'} {eY eY' : PartialHomeomorph Y Y'}
(h : (eX'.prod eY').source.Nonempty) : eX.prod eY = eX'.prod eY' ↔ eX = eX' ∧ eY = eY' := by
rw [eq_comm, prod_eq_prod_of_nonempty h, eq_comm, @eq_comm _ eY']
end Prod
/-! finite product of partial homeomorphisms -/
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] (ei : ∀ i, PartialHomeomorph (X i) (Y i))
/-- The product of a finite family of `PartialHomeomorph`s. -/
@[simps! toPartialEquiv apply symm_apply source target]
def pi : PartialHomeomorph (∀ i, X i) (∀ i, Y i) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (ei i).toPartialEquiv
open_source := isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (ei i).open_source
open_target := isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (ei i).open_target
continuousOn_toFun := continuousOn_pi.2 fun i =>
(ei i).continuousOn.comp (continuous_apply _).continuousOn fun _f hf => hf i trivial
continuousOn_invFun := continuousOn_pi.2 fun i =>
(ei i).continuousOn_symm.comp (continuous_apply _).continuousOn fun _f hf => hf i trivial
end Pi
/-! combining two partial homeomorphisms using `Set.piecewise` -/
section Piecewise
/-- Combine two `PartialHomeomorph`s using `Set.piecewise`. The source of the new
`PartialHomeomorph` is `s.ite e.source e'.source = e.source ∩ s ∪ e'.source \ s`, and similarly for
target. The function sends `e.source ∩ s` to `e.target ∩ t` using `e` and
`e'.source \ s` to `e'.target \ t` using `e'`, and similarly for the inverse function.
To ensure the maps `toFun` and `invFun` are inverse of each other on the new `source` and `target`,
the definition assumes that the sets `s` and `t` are related both by `e.is_image` and `e'.is_image`.
To ensure that the new maps are continuous on `source`/`target`, it also assumes that `e.source` and
`e'.source` meet `frontier s` on the same set and `e x = e' x` on this intersection. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied toPartialEquiv apply]
def piecewise (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)]
[∀ y, Decidable (y ∈ t)] (H : e.IsImage s t) (H' : e'.IsImage s t)
(Hs : e.source ∩ frontier s = e'.source ∩ frontier s)
(Heq : EqOn e e' (e.source ∩ frontier s)) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquiv.piecewise e'.toPartialEquiv s t H H'
open_source := e.open_source.ite e'.open_source Hs
open_target :=
e.open_target.ite e'.open_target <| H.frontier.inter_eq_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn H'.frontier Hs Heq
continuousOn_toFun := continuousOn_piecewise_ite e.continuousOn e'.continuousOn Hs Heq
continuousOn_invFun :=
continuousOn_piecewise_ite e.continuousOn_symm e'.continuousOn_symm
(H.frontier.inter_eq_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn H'.frontier Hs Heq)
(H.frontier.symm_eqOn_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn Hs Heq)
@[simp]
theorem symm_piecewise (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y}
[∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] [∀ y, Decidable (y ∈ t)] (H : e.IsImage s t) (H' : e'.IsImage s t)
(Hs : e.source ∩ frontier s = e'.source ∩ frontier s)
(Heq : EqOn e e' (e.source ∩ frontier s)) :
(e.piecewise e' s t H H' Hs Heq).symm =
e.symm.piecewise e'.symm t s H.symm H'.symm
(H.frontier.inter_eq_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn H'.frontier Hs Heq)
(H.frontier.symm_eqOn_of_inter_eq_of_eqOn Hs Heq) :=
rfl
/-- Combine two `PartialHomeomorph`s with disjoint sources and disjoint targets. We reuse
`PartialHomeomorph.piecewise` then override `toPartialEquiv` to `PartialEquiv.disjointUnion`.
This way we have better definitional equalities for `source` and `target`. -/
def disjointUnion (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ e.source)]
[∀ y, Decidable (y ∈ e.target)] (Hs : Disjoint e.source e'.source)
(Ht : Disjoint e.target e'.target) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
(e.piecewise e' e.source e.target e.isImage_source_target
(e'.isImage_source_target_of_disjoint e Hs.symm Ht.symm)
(by rw [e.open_source.inter_frontier_eq, (Hs.symm.frontier_right e'.open_source).inter_eq])
(by
rw [e.open_source.inter_frontier_eq]
exact eqOn_empty _ _)).replaceEquiv
(e.toPartialEquiv.disjointUnion e'.toPartialEquiv Hs Ht)
(PartialEquiv.disjointUnion_eq_piecewise _ _ _ _).symm
end Piecewise
section Continuity
/-- Continuity within a set at a point can be read under right composition with a local
homeomorphism, if the point is in its target -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right {f : Y → Z} {s : Set Y} {x : Y}
(h : x ∈ e.target) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, ← @tendsto_map'_iff _ _ _ _ e,
e.map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq (e.map_target h), (· ∘ ·), e.right_inv h]
/-- Continuity at a point can be read under right composition with a partial homeomorphism, if the
point is in its target -/
theorem continuousAt_iff_continuousAt_comp_right {f : Y → Z} {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ e) (e.symm x) := by
rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ, e.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right h,
preimage_univ, continuousWithinAt_univ]
/-- A function is continuous on a set if and only if its composition with a partial homeomorphism
on the right is continuous on the corresponding set. -/
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuousOn_comp_right {f : Y → Z} {s : Set Y} (h : s ⊆ e.target) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ContinuousOn (f ∘ e) (e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← e.symm_image_eq_source_inter_preimage h, ContinuousOn, forall_mem_image]
refine forall₂_congr fun x hx => ?_
rw [e.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right (h hx),
e.symm_image_eq_source_inter_preimage h, inter_comm, continuousWithinAt_inter]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds e.open_source (e.map_target (h hx))
/-- Continuity within a set at a point can be read under left composition with a local
homeomorphism if a neighborhood of the initial point is sent to the source of the local
homeomorphism -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_left {f : Z → X} {s : Set Z} {x : Z}
(hx : f x ∈ e.source) (h : f ⁻¹' e.source ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (e ∘ f) s x := by
refine ⟨(e.continuousAt hx).comp_continuousWithinAt, fun fe_cont => ?_⟩
rw [← continuousWithinAt_inter' h] at fe_cont ⊢
have : ContinuousWithinAt (e.symm ∘ e ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' e.source) x :=
haveI : ContinuousWithinAt e.symm univ (e (f x)) :=
(e.continuousAt_symm (e.map_source hx)).continuousWithinAt
ContinuousWithinAt.comp this fe_cont (subset_univ _)
exact this.congr (fun y hy => by simp [e.left_inv hy.2]) (by simp [e.left_inv hx])
/-- Continuity at a point can be read under left composition with a partial homeomorphism if a
neighborhood of the initial point is sent to the source of the partial homeomorphism -/
theorem continuousAt_iff_continuousAt_comp_left {f : Z → X} {x : Z} (h : f ⁻¹' e.source ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (e ∘ f) x := by
have hx : f x ∈ e.source := (mem_of_mem_nhds h :)
have h' : f ⁻¹' e.source ∈ 𝓝[univ] x := by rwa [nhdsWithin_univ]
rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ, ← continuousWithinAt_univ,
e.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_left hx h']
/-- A function is continuous on a set if and only if its composition with a partial homeomorphism
on the left is continuous on the corresponding set. -/
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuousOn_comp_left {f : Z → X} {s : Set Z} (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' e.source) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ContinuousOn (e ∘ f) s :=
forall₂_congr fun _x hx =>
e.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_left (h hx)
(mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin h)
/-- A function is continuous if and only if its composition with a partial homeomorphism
on the left is continuous and its image is contained in the source. -/
theorem continuous_iff_continuous_comp_left {f : Z → X} (h : f ⁻¹' e.source = univ) :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous (e ∘ f) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
exact e.continuousOn_iff_continuousOn_comp_left (Eq.symm h).subset
end Continuity
/-- The homeomorphism obtained by restricting a `PartialHomeomorph` to a subset of the source. -/
@[simps]
def homeomorphOfImageSubsetSource {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (ht : e '' s = t) :
s ≃ₜ t :=
have h₁ : MapsTo e s t := mapsTo'.2 ht.subset
have h₂ : t ⊆ e.target := ht ▸ e.image_source_eq_target ▸ image_subset e hs
have h₃ : MapsTo e.symm t s := ht ▸ forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx =>
(e.left_inv (hs hx)).symm ▸ hx
{ toFun := MapsTo.restrict e s t h₁
invFun := MapsTo.restrict e.symm t s h₃
left_inv := fun a => Subtype.ext (e.left_inv (hs a.2))
right_inv := fun b => Subtype.eq <| e.right_inv (h₂ b.2)
continuous_toFun := (e.continuousOn.mono hs).restrict_mapsTo h₁
continuous_invFun := (e.continuousOn_symm.mono h₂).restrict_mapsTo h₃ }
/-- A partial homeomorphism defines a homeomorphism between its source and target. -/
@[simps!]
def toHomeomorphSourceTarget : e.source ≃ₜ e.target :=
e.homeomorphOfImageSubsetSource subset_rfl e.image_source_eq_target
theorem secondCountableTopology_source [SecondCountableTopology Y] :
SecondCountableTopology e.source :=
e.toHomeomorphSourceTarget.secondCountableTopology
theorem nhds_eq_comap_inf_principal {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
𝓝 x = comap e (𝓝 (e x)) ⊓ 𝓟 e.source := by
lift x to e.source using hx
rw [← e.open_source.nhdsWithin_eq x.2, ← map_nhds_subtype_val, ← map_comap_setCoe_val,
e.toHomeomorphSourceTarget.nhds_eq_comap, nhds_subtype_eq_comap]
simp only [Function.comp_def, toHomeomorphSourceTarget_apply_coe, comap_comap]
/-- If a partial homeomorphism has source and target equal to univ, then it induces a homeomorphism
between the whole spaces, expressed in this definition. -/
@[simps (config := mfld_cfg) apply symm_apply]
-- TODO: add a `PartialEquiv` version
def toHomeomorphOfSourceEqUnivTargetEqUniv (h : e.source = (univ : Set X)) (h' : e.target = univ) :
X ≃ₜ Y where
toFun := e
invFun := e.symm
left_inv x :=
e.left_inv <| by
rw [h]
exact mem_univ _
right_inv x :=
e.right_inv <| by
rw [h']
exact mem_univ _
continuous_toFun := by
simpa only [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ, h] using e.continuousOn
continuous_invFun := by
simpa only [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ, h'] using e.continuousOn_symm
theorem isOpenEmbedding_restrict : IsOpenEmbedding (e.source.restrict e) := by
refine .of_continuous_injective_isOpenMap (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous
continuous_subtype_val Subtype.prop) e.injOn.injective fun V hV ↦ ?_
rw [Set.restrict_eq, Set.image_comp]
exact e.isOpen_image_of_subset_source (e.open_source.isOpenMap_subtype_val V hV)
fun _ ⟨x, _, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ x.2
/-- A partial homeomorphism whose source is all of `X` defines an open embedding of `X` into `Y`.
The converse is also true; see `IsOpenEmbedding.toPartialHomeomorph`. -/
theorem to_isOpenEmbedding (h : e.source = Set.univ) : IsOpenEmbedding e :=
e.isOpenEmbedding_restrict.comp
((Homeomorph.setCongr h).trans <| Homeomorph.Set.univ X).symm.isOpenEmbedding
end PartialHomeomorph
namespace Homeomorph
variable (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (e' : Y ≃ₜ Z)
/- Register as simp lemmas that the fields of a partial homeomorphism built from a homeomorphism
correspond to the fields of the original homeomorphism. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem refl_toPartialHomeomorph :
(Homeomorph.refl X).toPartialHomeomorph = PartialHomeomorph.refl X :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_toPartialHomeomorph : e.symm.toPartialHomeomorph = e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trans_toPartialHomeomorph :
(e.trans e').toPartialHomeomorph = e.toPartialHomeomorph.trans e'.toPartialHomeomorph :=
PartialHomeomorph.toPartialEquiv_injective <| Equiv.trans_toPartialEquiv _ _
/-- Precompose a partial homeomorphism with a homeomorphism.
We modify the source and target to have better definitional behavior. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def transPartialHomeomorph (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (f' : PartialHomeomorph Y Z) : PartialHomeomorph X Z where
toPartialEquiv := e.toEquiv.transPartialEquiv f'.toPartialEquiv
open_source := f'.open_source.preimage e.continuous
open_target := f'.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := f'.continuousOn.comp e.continuous.continuousOn fun _ => id
continuousOn_invFun := e.symm.continuous.comp_continuousOn f'.symm.continuousOn
theorem transPartialHomeomorph_eq_trans (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (f' : PartialHomeomorph Y Z) :
e.transPartialHomeomorph f' = e.toPartialHomeomorph.trans f' :=
PartialHomeomorph.toPartialEquiv_injective <| Equiv.transPartialEquiv_eq_trans _ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem transPartialHomeomorph_trans (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (f : PartialHomeomorph Y Z)
(f' : PartialHomeomorph Z Z') :
(e.transPartialHomeomorph f).trans f' = e.transPartialHomeomorph (f.trans f') := by
simp only [transPartialHomeomorph_eq_trans, PartialHomeomorph.trans_assoc]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trans_transPartialHomeomorph (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (e' : Y ≃ₜ Z) (f'' : PartialHomeomorph Z Z') :
(e.trans e').transPartialHomeomorph f'' =
e.transPartialHomeomorph (e'.transPartialHomeomorph f'') := by
simp only [transPartialHomeomorph_eq_trans, PartialHomeomorph.trans_assoc,
trans_toPartialHomeomorph]
end Homeomorph
namespace Topology.IsOpenEmbedding
variable (f : X → Y) (h : IsOpenEmbedding f)
/-- An open embedding of `X` into `Y`, with `X` nonempty, defines a partial homeomorphism
whose source is all of `X`. The converse is also true; see
`PartialHomeomorph.to_isOpenEmbedding`. -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg) apply source target]
noncomputable def toPartialHomeomorph [Nonempty X] : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
PartialHomeomorph.ofContinuousOpen (h.isEmbedding.injective.injOn.toPartialEquiv f univ)
h.continuous.continuousOn h.isOpenMap isOpen_univ
variable [Nonempty X]
lemma toPartialHomeomorph_left_inv {x : X} : (h.toPartialHomeomorph f).symm (f x) = x := by
rw [← congr_fun (h.toPartialHomeomorph_apply f), PartialHomeomorph.left_inv]
exact Set.mem_univ _
lemma toPartialHomeomorph_right_inv {x : Y} (hx : x ∈ Set.range f) :
f ((h.toPartialHomeomorph f).symm x) = x := by
rw [← congr_fun (h.toPartialHomeomorph_apply f), PartialHomeomorph.right_inv]
rwa [toPartialHomeomorph_target]
end Topology.IsOpenEmbedding
/-! inclusion of an open set in a topological space -/
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
/- `Nonempty s` is not a type class argument because `s`, being a subset, rarely comes with a type
class instance. Then we'd have to manually provide the instance every time we use the following
lemmas, tediously using `haveI := ...` or `@foobar _ _ _ ...`. -/
variable (s : Opens X) (hs : Nonempty s)
/-- The inclusion of an open subset `s` of a space `X` into `X` is a partial homeomorphism from the
subtype `s` to `X`. -/
noncomputable def partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe : PartialHomeomorph s X :=
IsOpenEmbedding.toPartialHomeomorph _ s.2.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe_coe : (s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs : s → X) = (↑) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe_source : (s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs).source = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe_target : (s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs).target = s := by
simp only [partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mfld_simps]
rfl
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/- post-compose with a partial homeomorphism -/
section transHomeomorph
/-- Postcompose a partial homeomorphism with a homeomorphism.
We modify the source and target to have better definitional behavior. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def transHomeomorph (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (f' : Y ≃ₜ Z) : PartialHomeomorph X Z where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquiv.transEquiv f'.toEquiv
open_source := e.open_source
open_target := e.open_target.preimage f'.symm.continuous
continuousOn_toFun := f'.continuous.comp_continuousOn e.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := e.symm.continuousOn.comp f'.symm.continuous.continuousOn fun _ => id
theorem transHomeomorph_eq_trans (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (f' : Y ≃ₜ Z) :
e.transHomeomorph f' = e.trans f'.toPartialHomeomorph :=
toPartialEquiv_injective <| PartialEquiv.transEquiv_eq_trans _ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem transHomeomorph_transHomeomorph (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (f' : Y ≃ₜ Z) (f'' : Z ≃ₜ Z') :
(e.transHomeomorph f').transHomeomorph f'' = e.transHomeomorph (f'.trans f'') := by
simp only [transHomeomorph_eq_trans, trans_assoc, Homeomorph.trans_toPartialHomeomorph]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trans_transHomeomorph (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (e' : PartialHomeomorph Y Z)
(f'' : Z ≃ₜ Z') :
(e.trans e').transHomeomorph f'' = e.trans (e'.transHomeomorph f'') := by
simp only [transHomeomorph_eq_trans, trans_assoc, Homeomorph.trans_toPartialHomeomorph]
end transHomeomorph
/-! `subtypeRestr`: restriction to a subtype -/
section subtypeRestr
open TopologicalSpace
variable (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y)
variable {s : Opens X} (hs : Nonempty s)
/-- The restriction of a partial homeomorphism `e` to an open subset `s` of the domain type
produces a partial homeomorphism whose domain is the subtype `s`. -/
noncomputable def subtypeRestr : PartialHomeomorph s Y :=
(s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs).trans e
theorem subtypeRestr_def : e.subtypeRestr hs = (s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs).trans e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem subtypeRestr_coe :
((e.subtypeRestr hs : PartialHomeomorph s Y) : s → Y) = Set.restrict ↑s (e : X → Y) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem subtypeRestr_source : (e.subtypeRestr hs).source = (↑) ⁻¹' e.source := by
simp only [subtypeRestr_def, mfld_simps]
theorem map_subtype_source {x : s} (hxe : (x : X) ∈ e.source) :
e x ∈ (e.subtypeRestr hs).target := by
refine ⟨e.map_source hxe, ?_⟩
rw [s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe_target, mem_preimage, e.leftInvOn hxe]
exact x.prop
/-- This lemma characterizes the transition functions of an open subset in terms of the transition
functions of the original space. -/
theorem subtypeRestr_symm_trans_subtypeRestr (f f' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) :
(f.subtypeRestr hs).symm.trans (f'.subtypeRestr hs) ≈
(f.symm.trans f').restr (f.target ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [subtypeRestr_def, trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm]
have openness₁ : IsOpen (f.target ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' s) := f.isOpen_inter_preimage_symm s.2
rw [← ofSet_trans _ openness₁, ← trans_assoc, ← trans_assoc]
refine EqOnSource.trans' ?_ (eqOnSource_refl _)
-- f' has been eliminated !!!
have set_identity : f.symm.source ∩ (f.target ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' s) = f.symm.source ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' s := by
mfld_set_tac
have openness₂ : IsOpen (s : Set X) := s.2
rw [ofSet_trans', set_identity, ← trans_of_set' _ openness₂, trans_assoc]
refine EqOnSource.trans' (eqOnSource_refl _) ?_
-- f has been eliminated !!!
refine Setoid.trans (symm_trans_self (s.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hs)) ?_
simp only [mfld_simps, Setoid.refl]
theorem subtypeRestr_symm_eqOn {U : Opens X} (hU : Nonempty U) :
EqOn e.symm (Subtype.val ∘ (e.subtypeRestr hU).symm) (e.subtypeRestr hU).target := by
intro y hy
rw [eq_comm, eq_symm_apply _ _ hy.1]
· change restrict _ e _ = _
rw [← subtypeRestr_coe, (e.subtypeRestr hU).right_inv hy]
· have := map_target _ hy; rwa [subtypeRestr_source] at this
theorem subtypeRestr_symm_eqOn_of_le {U V : Opens X} (hU : Nonempty U) (hV : Nonempty V)
(hUV : U ≤ V) : EqOn (e.subtypeRestr hV).symm (Set.inclusion hUV ∘ (e.subtypeRestr hU).symm)
(e.subtypeRestr hU).target := by
set i := Set.inclusion hUV
intro y hy
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.subtypeRestr_def] at hy ⊢
have hyV : e.symm y ∈ (V.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hV).target := by
rw [Opens.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe_target] at hy ⊢
exact hUV hy.2
refine (V.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hV).injOn ?_ trivial ?_
· rw [← PartialHomeomorph.symm_target]
apply PartialHomeomorph.map_source
rw [PartialHomeomorph.symm_source]
exact hyV
· rw [(V.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hV).right_inv hyV]
show _ = U.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hU _
rw [(U.partialHomeomorphSubtypeCoe hU).right_inv hy.2]
end subtypeRestr
variable {X X' Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X'] [TopologicalSpace Z]
[Nonempty Z] {f : X → X'}
/-- Extend a partial homeomorphism `e : X → Z` to `X' → Z`, using an open embedding `ι : X → X'`.
On `ι(X)`, the extension is specified by `e`; its value elsewhere is arbitrary (and uninteresting).
-/
noncomputable def lift_openEmbedding (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
PartialHomeomorph X' Z where
toFun := extend f e (fun _ ↦ (Classical.arbitrary Z))
invFun := f ∘ e.invFun
source := f '' e.source
target := e.target
map_source' := by
rintro x ⟨x₀, hx₀, hxx₀⟩
rw [← hxx₀, hf.injective.extend_apply e]
exact e.map_source' hx₀
map_target' z hz := mem_image_of_mem f (e.map_target' hz)
left_inv' := by
intro x ⟨x₀, hx₀, hxx₀⟩
rw [← hxx₀, hf.injective.extend_apply e, comp_apply]
congr
exact e.left_inv' hx₀
right_inv' z hz := by simpa only [comp_apply, hf.injective.extend_apply e] using e.right_inv' hz
open_source := hf.isOpenMap _ e.open_source
open_target := e.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := by
by_cases Nonempty X; swap
· intro x hx; simp_all
set F := (extend f e (fun _ ↦ (Classical.arbitrary Z))) with F_eq
have heq : EqOn F (e ∘ (hf.toPartialHomeomorph).symm) (f '' e.source) := by
intro x ⟨x₀, hx₀, hxx₀⟩
rw [← hxx₀, F_eq, hf.injective.extend_apply e, comp_apply, hf.toPartialHomeomorph_left_inv]
have : ContinuousOn (e ∘ (hf.toPartialHomeomorph).symm) (f '' e.source) := by
apply e.continuousOn_toFun.comp; swap
· intro x' ⟨x, hx, hx'x⟩
rw [← hx'x, hf.toPartialHomeomorph_left_inv]; exact hx
have : ContinuousOn (hf.toPartialHomeomorph).symm (f '' univ) :=
(hf.toPartialHomeomorph).continuousOn_invFun
exact this.mono <| image_mono <| subset_univ _
exact ContinuousOn.congr this heq
continuousOn_invFun := hf.continuous.comp_continuousOn e.continuousOn_invFun
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_toFun (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf) = extend f e (fun _ ↦ (Classical.arbitrary Z)) := rfl
lemma lift_openEmbedding_apply (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {x : X} :
(lift_openEmbedding e hf) (f x) = e x := by
simp_rw [e.lift_openEmbedding_toFun]
apply hf.injective.extend_apply
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_source (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).source = f '' e.source := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_target (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).target = e.target := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_symm (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).symm = f ∘ e.symm := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_symm_source (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).symm.source = e.target := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_symm_target (e : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).symm.target = f '' e.source := by
rw [PartialHomeomorph.symm_target, e.lift_openEmbedding_source]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_trans_apply
(e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) (z : Z) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).symm.trans (e'.lift_openEmbedding hf) z = (e.symm.trans e') z := by
simp [hf.injective.extend_apply e']
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma lift_openEmbedding_trans (e e' : PartialHomeomorph X Z) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
(e.lift_openEmbedding hf).symm.trans (e'.lift_openEmbedding hf) = e.symm.trans e' := by
ext z
· exact e.lift_openEmbedding_trans_apply e' hf z
· simp [hf.injective.extend_apply e]
· simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.trans_source, e.lift_openEmbedding_symm_source, e.symm_source,
e.lift_openEmbedding_symm, e'.lift_openEmbedding_source]
refine ⟨fun ⟨hx, ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨hx, ?_⟩, fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ ↦ ⟨hx, mem_image_of_mem f hx'⟩⟩
rw [mem_preimage]; rw [comp_apply] at hxy
exact (hf.injective hxy) ▸ hy
end PartialHomeomorph
| Mathlib/Topology/PartialHomeomorph.lean | 1,486 | 1,487 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a ⊤ = Ici a := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a ⊤ = Ioi a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioi a = Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ici a = Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iio a = Iio (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iic a = Iic (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iic, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top a)]
theorem image_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Icc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ico a b = Ico (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ico, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ico_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioc a b = Ioc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioo, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
end WithTop
/-! ### `WithBot` -/
namespace WithBot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' {⊥} = (∅ : Set α) :=
@WithTop.preimage_coe_top αᵒᵈ
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithBot α) = Ioi ⊥ :=
@WithTop.range_coe αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioi ⊥ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioc ⊥ a = Iic a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioo ⊥ a = Iio a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Iio a = Ioo (⊥ : WithBot α) a := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Iic a = Ioc (⊥ : WithBot α) a := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iic, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ioi a = Ioi (a : WithBot α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ioi_subset_Ioi bot_le)]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ici a = Ici (a : WithBot α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 <| bot_lt_coe a)]
theorem image_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Icc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 <| bot_lt_coe a)]
theorem image_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ioc a b = Ioc (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
| inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Ioi_self <| Ioi_subset_Ioi bot_le)]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 183 | 184 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.CompTypeclasses
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
/-!
# Propositional typeclasses on several monoid homs
This file contains typeclasses used in the definition of equivariant maps,
in the spirit what was initially developed by Frédéric Dupuis and Heather Macbeth for linear maps.
However, we do not expect that all maps should be guessed automatically,
as it happens for linear maps.
If `φ`, `ψ`… are monoid homs and `M`, `N`… are monoids, we add two instances:
* `MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ χ`, which expresses that `ψ.comp φ = χ`
* `MonoidHom.IsId φ`, which expresses that `φ = id`
Some basic lemmas are proved:
* `MonoidHom.CompTriple.comp` asserts `MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ (ψ.comp φ)`
* `MonoidHom.CompTriple.id_comp` asserts `MonoidHom.CompTriple φ ψ ψ`
in the presence of `MonoidHom.IsId φ`
* its variant `MonoidHom.CompTriple.comp_id`
TODO :
* align with RingHomCompTriple
* probably rename MonoidHom.CompTriple as MonoidHomCompTriple
(or, on the opposite, rename RingHomCompTriple as RingHom.CompTriple)
* does one need AddHom.CompTriple ?
-/
section MonoidHomCompTriple
namespace MonoidHom
/-- Class of composing triples -/
class CompTriple {M N P : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [Monoid P]
(φ : M →* N) (ψ : N →* P) (χ : outParam (M →* P)) : Prop where
/-- The maps form a commuting triangle -/
comp_eq : ψ.comp φ = χ
attribute [simp] CompTriple.comp_eq
namespace CompTriple
variable {M N P : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [Monoid P]
/-- Class of Id maps -/
class IsId (σ : M →* M) : Prop where
eq_id : σ = MonoidHom.id M
instance instIsId {M : Type*} [Monoid M] : IsId (MonoidHom.id M) where
eq_id := rfl
instance {σ : M →* M} [h : _root_.CompTriple.IsId σ] : IsId σ where
eq_id := by ext; exact congr_fun h.eq_id _
instance instComp_id {N P : Type*} [Monoid N] [Monoid P]
{φ : N →* N} [IsId φ] {ψ : N →* P} :
CompTriple φ ψ ψ where
comp_eq := by simp only [IsId.eq_id, MonoidHom.comp_id]
instance instId_comp {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N]
{φ : M →* N} {ψ : N →* N} [IsId ψ] :
CompTriple φ ψ φ where
comp_eq := by simp only [IsId.eq_id, MonoidHom.id_comp]
lemma comp_inv {φ : M →* N} {ψ : N →* M} (h : Function.RightInverse φ ψ)
{χ : M →* M} [IsId χ] :
CompTriple φ ψ χ where
comp_eq := by simp only [IsId.eq_id, ← DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, coe_comp, h.id, coe_id]
instance instRootCompTriple {φ : M →* N} {ψ : N →* P} {χ : M →* P} [κ : CompTriple φ ψ χ] :
_root_.CompTriple φ ψ χ where
comp_eq := by rw [← MonoidHom.coe_comp, κ.comp_eq]
/-- `φ`, `ψ` and `ψ.comp φ` form a `MonoidHom.CompTriple`
(to be used with care, because no simplification is done) -/
theorem comp {φ : M →* N} {ψ : N →* P} :
CompTriple φ ψ (ψ.comp φ) where
comp_eq := rfl
lemma comp_apply
{φ : M →* N} {ψ : N →* P} {χ : M →* P} (h : CompTriple φ ψ χ) (x : M) :
ψ (φ x) = χ x := by
| rw [← h.comp_eq, MonoidHom.comp_apply]
theorem comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [Monoid Q]
{φ₁ : M →* N} {φ₂ : N →* P} {φ₁₂ : M →* P}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/CompTypeclasses.lean | 92 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Init
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.StacksAttribute
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
/-!
# Categories
Defines a category, as a type class parametrised by the type of objects.
## Notations
Introduces notations in the `CategoryTheory` scope
* `X ⟶ Y` for the morphism spaces (type as `\hom`),
* `𝟙 X` for the identity morphism on `X` (type as `\b1`),
* `f ≫ g` for composition in the 'arrows' convention (type as `\gg`).
Users may like to add `g ⊚ f` for composition in the standard convention, using
```lean
local notation:80 g " ⊚ " f:80 => CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct.comp f g -- type as \oo
```
-/
library_note "CategoryTheory universes"
/--
The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C : Type u`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are independent, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`.
Typically any concrete example will either be a `SmallCategory`, where `v = u`,
which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type u} [SmallCategory C]
```
or a `LargeCategory`, where `u = v+1`, which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type (u+1)} [LargeCategory C]
```
In order for the library to handle these cases uniformly,
we generally work with the unconstrained `Category.{v u}`,
for which objects live in `Type u` and morphisms live in `Type v`.
Because the universe parameter `u` for the objects can be inferred from `C`
when we write `Category C`, while the universe parameter `v` for the morphisms
can not be automatically inferred, through the category theory library
we introduce universe parameters with morphism levels listed first,
as in
```
universe v u
```
or
```
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
```
when multiple independent universes are needed.
This has the effect that we can simply write `Category.{v} C`
(that is, only specifying a single parameter) while `u` will be inferred.
Often, however, it's not even necessary to include the `.{v}`.
(Although it was in earlier versions of Lean.)
If it is omitted a "free" universe will be used.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A preliminary structure on the way to defining a category,
containing the data, but none of the axioms. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
class CategoryStruct (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends Quiver.{v + 1} obj where
/-- The identity morphism on an object. -/
id : ∀ X : obj, Hom X X
/-- Composition of morphisms in a category, written `f ≫ g`. -/
comp : ∀ {X Y Z : obj}, (X ⟶ Y) → (Y ⟶ Z) → (X ⟶ Z)
initialize_simps_projections CategoryStruct (-toQuiver_Hom)
/-- Notation for the identity morphism in a category. -/
scoped notation "𝟙" => CategoryStruct.id -- type as \b1
/-- Notation for composition of morphisms in a category. -/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫ " => CategoryStruct.comp -- type as \gg
/-- Close the main goal with `sorry` if its type contains `sorry`, and fail otherwise. -/
syntax (name := sorryIfSorry) "sorry_if_sorry" : tactic
open Lean Meta Elab.Tactic in
@[tactic sorryIfSorry, inherit_doc sorryIfSorry] def evalSorryIfSorry : Tactic := fun _ => do
let goalType ← getMainTarget
if goalType.hasSorry then
closeMainGoal `sorry_if_sorry (← mkSorry goalType true)
else
throwError "The goal does not contain `sorry`"
/--
`rfl_cat` is a macro for `intros; rfl` which is attempted in `aesop_cat` before
doing the more expensive `aesop` tactic.
This gives a speedup because `simp` (called by `aesop`) is too slow.
There is a fix for this slowness in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7428.
So, when that is resolved, the performance impact of `rfl_cat` should be measured again.
Implementation notes:
* `refine id ?_`:
In some cases it is important that the type of the proof matches the expected type exactly.
e.g. if the goal is `2 = 1 + 1`, the `rfl` tactic will give a proof of type `2 = 2`.
Starting a proof with `refine id ?_` is a trick to make sure that the proof has exactly
the expected type, in this case `2 = 1 + 1`. See also https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/changing.20a.20proof.20can.20break.20a.20later.20proof
* `apply_rfl`:
`rfl` is a macro that attempts both `eq_refl` and `apply_rfl`. Since `apply_rfl`
subsumes `eq_refl`, we can use `apply_rfl` instead. This fails twice as fast as `rfl`.
-/
macro (name := rfl_cat) "rfl_cat" : tactic => do `(tactic| (refine id ?_; intros; apply_rfl))
/--
A thin wrapper for `aesop` which adds the `CategoryTheory` rule set and
allows `aesop` to look through semireducible definitions when calling `intros`.
This tactic fails when it is unable to solve the goal, making it suitable for
use in auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat) "aesop_cat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | rfl_cat |
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
We also use `aesop_cat?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_cat`
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat?) "aesop_cat?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | try_this rfl_cat |
aesop? $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_cat` which does not fail when it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal `aesop` is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat_nonterminal) "aesop_cat_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Subsingleton.elim
/-- The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are unconstrained, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`. (See also `LargeCategory` and `SmallCategory`.) -/
@[pp_with_univ, stacks 0014]
class Category (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends CategoryStruct.{v} obj where
/-- Identity morphisms are left identities for composition. -/
id_comp : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Identity morphisms are right identities for composition. -/
comp_id : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition in a category is associative. -/
assoc : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z), (f ≫ g) ≫ h = f ≫ g ≫ h := by
aesop_cat
attribute [simp] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id Category.assoc
attribute [trans] CategoryStruct.comp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by simp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by simp
/-- A `LargeCategory` has objects in one universe level higher than the universe level of
the morphisms. It is useful for examples such as the category of types, or the category
of groups, etc.
-/
abbrev LargeCategory (C : Type (u + 1)) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
/-- A `SmallCategory` has objects and morphisms in the same universe level.
-/
abbrev SmallCategory (C : Type u) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
section
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
initialize_simps_projections Category (-Hom)
/-- postcompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem eq_whisker {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f = g) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ h = g ≫ h := by rw [w]
/-- precompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem whisker_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : g = h) : f ≫ g = f ≫ h := by rw [w]
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the right).
If `f g : X ⟶ Y` and `w : f = g` and `h : Y ⟶ Z`, then `w =≫ h : f ≫ h = g ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " =≫ " => eq_whisker
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the left).
If `g h : Y ⟶ Z` and `w : g = h` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `f ≫= w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫= " => whisker_eq
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq {f g : Y ⟶ Z} (w : ∀ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq' (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : (fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => f ≫ h) = fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => g ≫ h) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_left_eq @fun Z h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w Z) h
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq' (f g : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : (fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ f) = fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ g) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_right_eq @fun X h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w X) h
theorem id_of_comp_left_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ g = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
theorem id_of_comp_right_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : Y ⟶ X), g ≫ f = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
theorem comp_ite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ if P then g else g') = if P then f ≫ g else f ≫ g' := by aesop
theorem ite_comp {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {X Y Z : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(if P then f else f') ≫ g = if P then f ≫ g else f' ≫ g := by aesop
theorem comp_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
(f ≫ if h : P then g h else g' h) = if h : P then f ≫ g h else f ≫ g' h := by aesop
theorem dite_comp {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ≫ g = if h : P then f h ≫ g else f' h ≫ g := by aesop
/-- A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if it can be cancelled when precomposed:
`f ≫ g = f ≫ h` implies `g = h`. -/
@[stacks 003B]
class Epi (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if it can be cancelled when precomposed. -/
left_cancellation : ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ g = f ≫ h → g = h
/-- A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if it can be cancelled when postcomposed:
`g ≫ f = h ≫ f` implies `g = h`. -/
@[stacks 003B]
class Mono (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if it can be cancelled when postcomposed. -/
right_cancellation : ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X), g ≫ f = h ≫ f → g = h
instance (X : C) : Epi (𝟙 X) :=
⟨fun g h w => by aesop⟩
|
instance (X : C) : Mono (𝟙 X) :=
⟨fun g h w => by aesop⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Category/Basic.lean | 270 | 272 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basis
/-!
# Rank of various constructions
## Main statements
- `rank_quotient_add_rank_le` : `rank M/N + rank N ≤ rank M`.
- `lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod`: `rank M × N ≤ rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_span_le_of_finite`: `rank (span s) ≤ #s` for finite `s`.
For free modules, we have
- `rank_prod` : `rank M × N = rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_finsupp` : `rank (ι →₀ M) = #ι * rank M`
- `rank_directSum`: `rank (⨁ Mᵢ) = ∑ rank Mᵢ`
- `rank_tensorProduct`: `rank (M ⊗ N) = rank M * rank N`.
Lemmas for ranks of submodules and subalgebras are also provided.
We have finrank variants for most lemmas as well.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u u' v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type u'} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Basis Cardinal DirectSum Function Module Set Submodule
section Quotient
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M]
theorem LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
{M' : Submodule R M} {ι₁ ι₂} {f : ι₁ → M'} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) (g : ι₂ → M)
(hg : LinearIndependent R (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := M') ∘ g)) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (f · : ι₁ → M) g) := by
refine .sum_type (hf.map' M'.subtype M'.ker_subtype) (.of_comp M'.mkQ hg) ?_
refine disjoint_def.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
have : x ∈ M' := span_le.mpr (Set.range_subset_iff.mpr fun i ↦ (f i).prop) h₁
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp.mp h₂
simp_rw [← Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← mkQ_apply, map_finsuppSum, map_smul, mkQ_apply] at this
rw [linearIndependent_iff.mp hg _ this, Finsupp.sum_zero_index]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias LinearIndependent.sum_elim_of_quotient := LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_of_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t) : LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
apply hs.union ht.of_comp
convert (Submodule.range_ker_disjoint ht).symm
· simp
aesop
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient {M' : Submodule R M}
{s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ M') (hs' : LinearIndepOn R id s) {t : Set M}
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ M') t) : LinearIndepOn R id (s ∪ t) :=
hs'.union_of_quotient <| by
rw [image_id]
exact ht.of_comp ((span R s).mapQ M' (LinearMap.id) (span_le.2 hs))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient :=
LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient
theorem linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) ↔
LinearIndepOn R f s ∧ LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.union_of_quotient h.2⟩
· exact h.mono subset_union_left
apply (h.mono subset_union_right).map
simpa [← image_eq_range] using ((linearIndepOn_union_iff hst).1 h).2.2.symm
theorem LinearIndepOn.quotient_iff_union {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t ↔ LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
rw [linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient hst, and_iff_right hs]
theorem rank_quotient_add_rank_le [Nontrivial R] (M' : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ M') + Module.rank R M' ≤ Module.rank R M := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R (M ⧸ M')
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M'
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
refine ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ?_
choose f hf using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective M'
simpa [add_comm] using (LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient ht (fun (i : s) ↦ f i)
(by simpa [Function.comp_def, hf] using hs)).cardinal_le_rank
theorem rank_quotient_le (p : Submodule R M) : Module.rank R (M ⧸ p) ≤ Module.rank R M :=
(mkQ p).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_quotient_le [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Finite R M]
(s : Submodule R M) : finrank R (M ⧸ s) ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat ((Submodule.mkQ s).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
end Quotient
variable [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
variable [Module R M]
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem rank_ulift : Module.rank R (ULift.{w} M) = Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) :=
Cardinal.lift_injective.{v} <| Eq.symm <| (lift_lift _).trans ULift.moduleEquiv.symm.lift_rank_eq
@[simp]
theorem finrank_ulift : finrank R (ULift M) = finrank R M := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_ulift, toNat_lift]
end ULift
section Prod
variable (R M M')
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M']
theorem rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ ≤ Module.rank R (M × M₁) := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M₁
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦
(linearIndependent_inl_union_inr' hs ht).cardinal_le_rank
theorem lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') ≤ Module.rank R (M × M') := by
rw [← rank_ulift, ← rank_ulift]
exact (rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod R _).trans_eq
(ULift.moduleEquiv.prodCongr ULift.moduleEquiv).rank_eq
variable {R M M'}
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M'] [Module.Free R M₁]
open Module.Free
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free, then the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M).lift + (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_prod : Module.rank R (M × M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} (Module.rank R M') := by
simpa [rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M', lift_umax]
using ((chooseBasis R M).prod (chooseBasis R M')).mk_eq_rank.symm
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free (and lie in the same universe), the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M) + (Module.rank R M')`. -/
theorem rank_prod' : Module.rank R (M × M₁) = Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ := by simp
/-- The finrank of `M × M'` is `(finrank R M) + (finrank R M')`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_prod [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M'] :
finrank R (M × M') = finrank R M + finrank R M' := by
simp [finrank, rank_lt_aleph0 R M, rank_lt_aleph0 R M']
end Prod
section Finsupp
variable (R M M')
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
| open Module.Free
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 178 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
infer_instance
/-- Prefer `imageToKernel`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) (h) :
Subobject.ofLE (imageSubobject f) (kernelSubobject g) h = imageToKernel f g w :=
rfl
attribute [local instance] HasForget.instFunLike
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
-- a more suitable lemma is added below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageToKernel_arrow (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [imageToKernel]
@[simp]
lemma imageToKernel_arrow_apply {FV : V → V → Type*} {CV : V → Type*}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FV X Y) (CV X) (CV Y)] [ConcreteCategory V FV] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(x : ToType (Subobject.underlying.obj (imageSubobject f))) :
(kernelSubobject g).arrow (imageToKernel f g w x) =
(imageSubobject f).arrow x := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, imageToKernel_arrow]
-- This is less useful as a `simp` lemma than it initially appears,
-- as it "loses" the information the morphism factors through the image.
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ imageToKernel f g w = factorThruKernelSubobject g f w := by
ext
simp
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C)
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_zero_left [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] {w} :
imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g w = 0 := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_zero_right [HasImages V] {w} :
imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) w =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ inv (kernelSubobject (0 : B ⟶ C)).arrow := by
ext
simp
section
variable [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_right {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]) =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le g h) := by
ext
simp
theorem imageToKernel_comp_left {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g (by simp [w]) =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_mono {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) [Mono h] (w) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) w =
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simpa using w : (f ≫ g) ≫ h = 0 ≫ h)) ≫
(Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_mono g h)).inv := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_epi_comp {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) [Epi h] (w) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g w =
| Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using w : h ≫ f ≫ g = h ≫ 0)) := by
ext
simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 119 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We also define versions of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `AnalyticAt`, and `AnalyticOnNhd` restricted to
a set, similar to `ContinuousWithinAt`. See `Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within` for basic properties.
* `AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` means a power series at `x` converges to `f` on `𝓝[s ∪ {x}] x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s t` means `∀ x ∈ t, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal Set Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum
fun_prop
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => h.le_tsum' _
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
/-- `0` has infinite radius of convergence -/
@[simp] lemma zero_radius : (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F).radius = ∞ := by
rw [← constFormalMultilinearSeries_zero]
exact constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
rw [← div_lt_one this] at rt
refine ⟨_, rt, C, Or.inr zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
calc
|‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n| = ‖p n‖ * (t : ℝ) ^ n * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by
field_simp [mul_right_comm, abs_mul]
_ ≤ C * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by gcongr; apply hC
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = o(1)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
(fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (fun _ => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) :=
let ⟨_, ha, hp⟩ := p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h
hp.trans <| (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left ha.1.le ha.2).congr (fun _ => rfl) one_pow
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1` and `C > 0`, `‖p n‖ * r ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n`. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 5).mp
(p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h)
rcases this with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, H⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (H n)⟩
/-- If `r ≠ 0` and `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(aⁿ)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then `r < p.radius`. -/
theorem lt_radius_of_isBigO (h₀ : r ≠ 0) {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1)
(hp : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] (a ^ ·)) : ↑r < p.radius := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 2 5)
rcases this.mp ⟨a, ha, hp⟩ with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← NNReal.coe_pos] at h₀
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.1.le
have : (r : ℝ) < r / a := by
simpa only [div_one] using (div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left h₀ zero_lt_one ha.1).2 ha.2
norm_cast at this
rw [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at this
refine this.trans_le (p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => ?_)
rw [NNReal.coe_div, div_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, div_le_iff₀ (pow_pos ha.1 n)]
exact (le_abs_self _).trans (hp n)
|
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨_, ha, C, hC, h⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => (h n).trans <| mul_le_of_le_one_right hC.lt.le (pow_le_one₀ ha.1.le ha.2.le)⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 220 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm _ _ := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := abs_sub_le _ _ _
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
|
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 1,056 | 1,058 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,072 | 2,074 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Egorov theorem
This file contains the Egorov theorem which states that an almost everywhere convergent
sequence on a finite measure space converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
This theorem is useful for the Vitali convergence theorem as well as theorems regarding
convergence in measure.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto`: Egorov's theorem which shows that a sequence of
almost everywhere convergent functions converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MetricSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
namespace Egorov
/-- Given a sequence of functions `f` and a function `g`, `notConvergentSeq f g n j` is the
set of elements such that `f k x` and `g x` are separated by at least `1 / (n + 1)` for some
`k ≥ j`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def notConvergentSeq [Preorder ι] (f : ι → α → β) (g : α → β) (n : ℕ) (j : ι) : Set α :=
⋃ (k) (_ : j ≤ k), { x | 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) }
variable {n : ℕ} {j : ι} {s : Set α} {ε : ℝ} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem mem_notConvergentSeq_iff [Preorder ι] {x : α} :
x ∈ notConvergentSeq f g n j ↔ ∃ k ≥ j, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) := by
simp_rw [notConvergentSeq, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_setOf]
theorem notConvergentSeq_antitone [Preorder ι] : Antitone (notConvergentSeq f g n) :=
fun _ _ hjk => Set.iUnion₂_mono' fun l hl => ⟨l, le_trans hjk hl, Set.Subset.rfl⟩
theorem measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
μ (s ∩ ⋂ j, notConvergentSeq f g n j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_atTop, ae_iff] at hfg
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← hfg]
refine measure_mono fun x => ?_
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, mem_notConvergentSeq_iff]
push_neg
rintro ⟨hmem, hx⟩
refine ⟨hmem, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ), Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat, fun N => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩ := hx N
exact ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂.le⟩
theorem notConvergentSeq_measurableSet [Preorder ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable[m] (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
MeasurableSet (notConvergentSeq f g n j) :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ =>
StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_lt stronglyMeasurable_const <| (hf k).dist hg
theorem measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· have : (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) = fun j => 0 := by
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [this]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
rw [← measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero hfg n, Set.inter_iInter]
refine tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop
(fun n ↦ (hsm.inter <| notConvergentSeq_measurableSet hf hg).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun k l hkl => Set.inter_subset_inter_right _ <| notConvergentSeq_antitone hkl)
⟨h.some, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hs (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)⟩
variable [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
theorem exists_notConvergentSeq_lt (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
∃ j : ι, μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n) := by
have ⟨N, hN⟩ := (ENNReal.tendsto_atTop ENNReal.zero_ne_top).1
(measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero hf hg hsm hs hfg n) (ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n)) (by
rw [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact mul_pos hε (pow_pos (by norm_num) n))
rw [zero_add] at hN
exact ⟨N, (hN N le_rfl).2⟩
/-- Given some `ε > 0`, `notConvergentSeqLTIndex` provides the index such that
`notConvergentSeq` (intersected with a set of finite measure) has measure less than
`ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def notConvergentSeqLTIndex (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) : ι :=
Classical.choose <| exists_notConvergentSeq_lt hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n
theorem notConvergentSeqLTIndex_spec (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n (notConvergentSeqLTIndex hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n)) ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n) :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_notConvergentSeq_lt hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n
/-- Given some `ε > 0`, `iUnionNotConvergentSeq` is the union of `notConvergentSeq` with
specific indices such that `iUnionNotConvergentSeq` has measure less equal than `ε`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def iUnionNotConvergentSeq (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : Set α :=
⋃ n, s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n (notConvergentSeqLTIndex (half_pos hε) hf hg hsm hs hfg n)
theorem iUnionNotConvergentSeq_measurableSet (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
MeasurableSet <| iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => hsm.inter <| notConvergentSeq_measurableSet hf hg
theorem measure_iUnionNotConvergentSeq (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
μ (iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
refine le_trans (measure_iUnion_le _) (le_trans
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum <| notConvergentSeqLTIndex_spec (half_pos hε) hf hg hsm hs hfg) ?_)
simp_rw [ENNReal.ofReal_mul (half_pos hε).le]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ← ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg, inv_eq_one_div, tsum_geometric_two,
← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (half_pos hε).le, div_mul_cancel₀ ε two_ne_zero]
· intro n; positivity
· rw [inv_eq_one_div]
exact summable_geometric_two
theorem iUnionNotConvergentSeq_subset (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg ⊆ s := by
rw [iUnionNotConvergentSeq, ← Set.inter_iUnion]
exact Set.inter_subset_left
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_diff_iUnionNotConvergentSeq (hε : 0 < ε)
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOn f g atTop (s \ Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg) := by
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff]
intro δ hδ
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt hδ
rw [eventually_atTop]
refine ⟨Egorov.notConvergentSeqLTIndex (half_pos hε) hf hg hsm hs hfg N, fun n hn x hx => ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_diff, Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq, not_exists, Set.mem_iUnion,
Set.mem_inter_iff, not_and, exists_and_left] at hx
obtain ⟨hxs, hx⟩ := hx
specialize hx hxs N
rw [Egorov.mem_notConvergentSeq_iff] at hx
push_neg at hx
rw [dist_comm]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (hx n hn) hN
end Egorov
variable [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} {s : Set α}
/-- **Egorov's theorem**: If `f : ι → α → β` is a sequence of strongly measurable functions that
converges to `g : α → β` almost everywhere on a measurable set `s` of finite measure,
then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a subset `t ⊆ s` such that `μ t ≤ ε` and `f` converges to `g`
uniformly on `s \ t`. We require the index type `ι` to be countable, and usually `ι = ℕ`.
In other words, a sequence of almost everywhere convergent functions converges uniformly except on
an arbitrarily small set. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε ∧ TendstoUniformlyOn f g atTop (s \ t) :=
⟨Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg,
Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq_subset hε hf hg hsm hs hfg,
Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq_measurableSet hε hf hg hsm hs hfg,
Egorov.measure_iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg,
Egorov.tendstoUniformlyOn_diff_iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg⟩
/-- Egorov's theorem for finite measure spaces. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε ∧ TendstoUniformlyOn f g atTop tᶜ := by
have ⟨t, _, ht, htendsto⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto hf hg MeasurableSet.univ
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ) (by filter_upwards [hfg] with _ htendsto _ using htendsto) hε
refine ⟨_, ht, ?_⟩
rwa [Set.compl_eq_univ_diff]
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Egorov.lean | 211 | 218 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
| variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 484 | 486 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
end equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
theorem mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal := mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage (hf : MapsTo f s t) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := hf
theorem mapsTo_iff_subset_preimage : MapsTo f s t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn => simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
lemma MapsTo.insert (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : α) : MapsTo f (insert x s) (insert (f x) t) := by
simpa [← singleton_union] using h.mono_right subset_union_right
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
end MapsTo
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
lemma InjOn.of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn f s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq ↦ h hx hy (by simp [heq])
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s ↔ InjOn g (f '' s) :=
⟨image_of_comp, fun h ↦ InjOn.comp h hf <| mapsTo_image f s⟩
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
theorem _root_.Set.InjOn.injective_iff (s : Set β) (h : InjOn g s) (hs : range f ⊆ s) :
Injective (g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨(·.of_comp), fun h _ ↦ by aesop⟩
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun _ hs _ ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (hB hs) (hB ht)).1 hst
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
lemma InjOn.image (h : s.InjOn f) : s.powerset.InjOn (image f) :=
fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ h' ↦ by rw [← h.preimage_image_inter hs₁, h', h.preimage_image_inter hs₂]
theorem InjOn.image_eq_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ = f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
h.image.eq_iff h₁ h₂
lemma InjOn.image_subset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊆ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ?_, image_subset _⟩
rw [← h.preimage_image_inter h₁, ← h.preimage_image_inter h₂]
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono h')
lemma InjOn.image_ssubset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊂ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := by
simp_rw [ssubset_def, h.image_subset_image_iff h₁ h₂, h.image_subset_image_iff h₂ h₁]
-- TODO: can this move to a better place?
theorem _root_.Disjoint.image {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : Disjoint s t) (hf : u.InjOn f)
(hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [← hf.image_inter hs ht, h, image_empty]
lemma InjOn.image_diff {t : Set α} (h : s.InjOn f) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' (s ∩ t) := by
refine subset_antisymm (subset_diff.2 ⟨image_subset f diff_subset, ?_⟩)
(diff_subset_iff.2 (by rw [← image_union, inter_union_diff]))
exact Disjoint.image disjoint_sdiff_inter h diff_subset inter_subset_left
lemma InjOn.image_diff_subset {f : α → β} {t : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t := by
rw [h.image_diff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
alias image_diff_of_injOn := InjOn.image_diff_subset
theorem InjOn.imageFactorization_injective (h : InjOn f s) :
Injective (s.imageFactorization f) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h' ↦ by simpa [imageFactorization, h.eq_iff hx hy] using h'
@[simp] theorem imageFactorization_injective_iff : Injective (s.imageFactorization f) ↔ InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ ↦ by simpa using @h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ (by simpa [imageFactorization]),
InjOn.imageFactorization_injective⟩
end injOn
section graphOn
variable {x : α × β}
lemma graphOn_univ_inj {g : α → β} : univ.graphOn f = univ.graphOn g ↔ f = g := by simp
lemma graphOn_univ_injective : Injective (univ.graphOn : (α → β) → Set (α × β)) :=
fun _f _g ↦ graphOn_univ_inj.1
lemma exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f : α → β, s = graphOn f (Prod.fst '' s)) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
rw [hf]
exact InjOn.image_of_comp <| injOn_id _
· have : ∀ x ∈ Prod.fst '' s, ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s := forall_mem_image.2 fun (x, y) h ↦ ⟨y, h⟩
choose! f hf using this
rw [forall_mem_image] at hf
use f
rw [graphOn, image_image, EqOn.image_eq_self]
exact fun x hx ↦ h (hf hx) hx rfl
lemma exists_eq_graphOn [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f t, s = graphOn f t) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s :=
.trans ⟨fun ⟨f, t, hs⟩ ↦ ⟨f, by rw [hs, image_fst_graphOn]⟩, fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨f, _, hf⟩⟩
exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst
end graphOn
/-! ### Surjectivity on a set -/
section surjOn
theorem SurjOn.subset_range (h : SurjOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
Subset.trans h <| image_subset_range f s
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype :
SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ (t' : Set β) (g : s → t'), t ⊆ t' ∧ Surjective g ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨_, (mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s _, h, surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _, fun _ => rfl⟩,
fun ⟨t', g, htt', hg, hfg⟩ y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hg ⟨y, htt' hy⟩
⟨x, x.2, by rw [hfg, hx, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩⟩
theorem surjOn_empty (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s ∅ :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem surjOn_empty_iff : SurjOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ := by
simp [SurjOn, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma surjOn_singleton : SurjOn f s {b} ↔ b ∈ f '' s := singleton_subset_iff
theorem surjOn_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s (f '' s) :=
Subset.rfl
theorem SurjOn.comap_nonempty (h : SurjOn f s t) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(ht.mono h).of_image
theorem SurjOn.congr (h : SurjOn f₁ s t) (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₂ s t := by
rwa [SurjOn, ← H.image_eq]
theorem EqOn.surjOn_iff (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₁ s t ↔ SurjOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun H => H.congr h, fun H => H.congr h.symm⟩
theorem SurjOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (hf : SurjOn f s₁ t₂) : SurjOn f s₂ t₁ :=
Subset.trans ht <| Subset.trans hf <| image_subset _ hs
theorem SurjOn.union (h₁ : SurjOn f s t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s t₂) : SurjOn f s (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => h₁ hx) fun hx => h₂ hx
theorem SurjOn.union_union (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
(h₁.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl _)).union
(h₂.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl _))
theorem SurjOn.inter_inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
intro y hy
rcases h₁ hy.1 with ⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ hy.2 with ⟨x₂, hx₂, heq⟩
obtain rfl : x₁ = x₂ := h (Or.inl hx₁) (Or.inr hx₂) heq.symm
exact mem_image_of_mem f ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem SurjOn.inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) t :=
inter_self t ▸ h₁.inter_inter h₂ h
lemma surjOn_id (s : Set α) : SurjOn id s s := by simp [SurjOn]
theorem SurjOn.comp (hg : SurjOn g t p) (hf : SurjOn f s t) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
Subset.trans hg <| Subset.trans (image_subset g hf) <| image_comp g f s ▸ Subset.refl _
lemma SurjOn.of_comp (h : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p) (hr : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn g t p := by
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := h hz
exact ⟨f x, hr hx, rfl⟩
lemma surjOn_comp_iff : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ SurjOn g (f '' s) p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_comp <| mapsTo_image f s, fun h ↦ h.comp <| surjOn_image _ _⟩
lemma SurjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : SurjOn f s s) : ∀ n, SurjOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => surjOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma SurjOn.comp_left (hf : SurjOn f s t) (g : β → γ) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) := by
rw [SurjOn, image_comp g f]; exact image_subset _ hf
lemma SurjOn.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := by
rwa [SurjOn, image_comp g f, image_preimage_eq _ hf]
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : t.Nonempty → s.Nonempty) :
SurjOn f s t :=
fun _ ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| (h ⟨_, ha⟩).image _
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s s :=
surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem surjective_iff_surjOn_univ : Surjective f ↔ SurjOn f univ univ := by
simp [Surjective, SurjOn, subset_def]
theorem SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo (h₁ : SurjOn f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset h₂.image_subset h₁
theorem image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo : f '' s = t ↔ s.SurjOn f t ∧ s.MapsTo f t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.2⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.surjOn_image f, s.mapsTo_image f⟩
lemma SurjOn.image_preimage (h : Set.SurjOn f s t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : f '' (f ⁻¹' t₁) = t₁ :=
image_preimage_eq_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ mem_range_of_mem_image f s <| h <| ht hx
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_compl (h : SurjOn f s t) (h' : Injective f) : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ :=
fun _ hs ht =>
let ⟨_, hx', HEq⟩ := h ht
hs <| h' HEq ▸ hx'
theorem MapsTo.surjOn_compl (h : MapsTo f s t) (h' : Surjective f) : SurjOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
h'.forall.2 fun _ ht => (mem_image_of_mem _) fun hs => ht (h hs)
theorem EqOn.cancel_right (hf : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f)) (hf' : s.SurjOn f t) : t.EqOn g₁ g₂ := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf' hb
exact hf ha
theorem SurjOn.cancel_right (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ t.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_right hf, fun h => h.comp_right hf'⟩
theorem eqOn_comp_right_iff : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ (f '' s).EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
(s.surjOn_image f).cancel_right <| s.mapsTo_image f
theorem SurjOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
(∀ y ∈ t, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
⟨fun H x hx ↦ H (f x) (hf' hx), fun H _y hy ↦ let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := hf hy; hxy ▸ H x hx⟩
end surjOn
/-! ### Bijectivity -/
section bijOn
theorem BijOn.mapsTo (h : BijOn f s t) : MapsTo f s t :=
h.left
theorem BijOn.injOn (h : BijOn f s t) : InjOn f s :=
h.right.left
theorem BijOn.surjOn (h : BijOn f s t) : SurjOn f s t :=
h.right.right
theorem BijOn.mk (h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : InjOn f s) (h₃ : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem bijOn_empty (f : α → β) : BijOn f ∅ ∅ :=
⟨mapsTo_empty f ∅, injOn_empty f, surjOn_empty f ∅⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_left : BijOn f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.mapsTo, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_right : BijOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.surjOn, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] lemma bijOn_singleton : BijOn f {a} {b} ↔ f a = b := by simp [BijOn, eq_comm]
theorem BijOn.inter_mapsTo (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s₂) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun _ hy =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h₁.surjOn hy.1
⟨x, ⟨hx, h₃ ⟨hx, hxy.symm.subst hy.2⟩⟩, hxy⟩⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter_bijOn (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₂ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s₁) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
inter_comm s₂ s₁ ▸ inter_comm t₂ t₁ ▸ h₂.inter_mapsTo h₁ h₃
theorem BijOn.inter (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left,
h₁.surjOn.inter_inter h₂.surjOn h⟩
theorem BijOn.union (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.union_union h₂.mapsTo, h, h₁.surjOn.union_union h₂.surjOn⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_range (h : BijOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
h.surjOn.subset_range
theorem InjOn.bijOn_image (h : InjOn f s) : BijOn f s (f '' s) :=
BijOn.mk (mapsTo_image f s) h (Subset.refl _)
theorem BijOn.congr (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₂ s t :=
BijOn.mk (h₁.mapsTo.congr h) (h₁.injOn.congr h) (h₁.surjOn.congr h)
theorem EqOn.bijOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₁ s t ↔ BijOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem BijOn.image_eq (h : BijOn f s t) : f '' s = t :=
h.surjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.mapsTo
lemma BijOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∀ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp h _ ha := h _ <| hf.mapsTo ha
mpr h b hb := by obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact h _ ha
lemma BijOn.exists {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∃ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp := by rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact ⟨a, ha, h⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨a, ha, h⟩; exact ⟨f a, hf.mapsTo ha, h⟩
lemma _root_.Equiv.image_eq_iff_bijOn (e : α ≃ β) : e '' s = t ↔ BijOn e s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨(mapsTo_image e s).mono_right h.subset, e.injective.injOn, h ▸ surjOn_image e s⟩,
BijOn.image_eq⟩
lemma bijOn_id (s : Set α) : BijOn id s s := ⟨s.mapsTo_id, s.injOn_id, s.surjOn_id⟩
theorem BijOn.comp (hg : BijOn g t p) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
BijOn.mk (hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo) (hg.injOn.comp hf.injOn hf.mapsTo) (hg.surjOn.comp hf.surjOn)
/-- If `f : α → β` and `g : β → γ` and if `f` is injective on `s`, then `f ∘ g` is a bijection
on `s` iff `g` is a bijection on `f '' s`. -/
theorem bijOn_comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ BijOn g (f '' s) p := by
simp only [BijOn, InjOn.comp_iff, surjOn_comp_iff, mapsTo_image_iff, hf]
/--
If we have a commutative square
```
α --f--> β
| |
p₁ p₂
| |
\/ \/
γ --g--> δ
```
and `f` induces a bijection from `s : Set α` to `t : Set β`, then `g`
induces a bijection from the image of `s` to the image of `t`, as long as `g` is
is injective on the image of `s`.
-/
theorem bijOn_image_image {p₁ : α → γ} {p₂ : β → δ} {g : γ → δ} (comm : ∀ a, p₂ (f a) = g (p₁ a))
(hbij : BijOn f s t) (hinj: InjOn g (p₁ '' s)) : BijOn g (p₁ '' s) (p₂ '' t) := by
obtain ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩ := hbij
refine ⟨?_, hinj, ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f a, h1 ha, by rw [comm a]⟩
· rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h3 hb
rw [← image_comp, comm]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
lemma BijOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n, BijOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => s.bijOn_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty ↔ t.Nonempty) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ h.1, injOn_of_subsingleton _ _, surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ h.2⟩
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : BijOn f s s :=
bijOn_of_subsingleton' _ Iff.rfl
theorem BijOn.bijective (h : BijOn f s t) : Bijective (h.mapsTo.restrict f s t) :=
⟨fun x y h' => Subtype.ext <| h.injOn x.2 y.2 <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h', fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h.surjOn hy
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.eq hxy⟩⟩
theorem bijective_iff_bijOn_univ : Bijective f ↔ BijOn f univ univ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨mapsTo_univ f _, inj.injOn, Iff.mp surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩)
fun h =>
let ⟨_map, inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨Iff.mpr injective_iff_injOn_univ inj, Iff.mpr surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ, _⟩ := bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
theorem BijOn.compl (hst : BijOn f s t) (hf : Bijective f) : BijOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
⟨hst.surjOn.mapsTo_compl hf.1, hf.1.injOn, hst.mapsTo.surjOn_compl hf.2⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_right {r : Set β} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrt : r ⊆ t) :
BijOn f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' r) r := by
refine ⟨inter_subset_right, hf.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn (hrt hx)
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_left {r : Set α} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
BijOn f r (f '' r) :=
(hf.injOn.mono hrs).bijOn_image
theorem BijOn.insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) (hfa : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) ↔ BijOn f s t where
mp h := by
have := congrArg (· \ {f a}) (image_insert_eq ▸ h.image_eq)
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, insert_diff_of_mem] at this
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hfa, diff_singleton_eq_self] at this
· exact ⟨by simp [← this, mapsTo'], h.injOn.mono (subset_insert ..),
by simp [← this, surjOn_image]⟩
simp only [mem_image, not_exists, not_and]
intro x hx
rw [h.injOn.eq_iff (by simp [hx]) (by simp)]
exact ha ∘ (· ▸ hx)
mpr h := by
repeat rw [insert_eq]
refine (bijOn_singleton.mpr rfl).union h ?_
simp only [singleton_union, injOn_insert fun x ↦ (hfa (h.mapsTo x)), h.injOn, mem_image,
not_exists, not_and, true_and]
exact fun _ hx h₂ ↦ hfa (h₂ ▸ h.mapsTo hx)
theorem BijOn.insert (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) :=
(insert_iff (h₂ <| h₁.mapsTo ·) h₂).mpr h₁
theorem BijOn.sdiff_singleton (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : a ∈ s) :
BijOn f (s \ {a}) (t \ {f a}) := by
convert h₁.subset_left diff_subset
simp [h₁.injOn.image_diff, h₁.image_eq, h₂, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
end bijOn
/-! ### left inverse -/
namespace LeftInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : EqOn (f' ∘ f) id s :=
h
theorem eq (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : f' (f x) = x :=
h hx
theorem congr_left (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) {t : Set β} (h₁' : MapsTo f s t)
(heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) : LeftInvOn f₂' f s := fun _ hx => heq (h₁' hx) ▸ h₁ hx
theorem congr_right (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f₁ s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : LeftInvOn f₁' f₂ s :=
fun _ hx => heq hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem injOn (h : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) : InjOn f s := fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ heq =>
calc
x₁ = f₁' (f x₁) := Eq.symm <| h h₁
_ = f₁' (f x₂) := congr_arg f₁' heq
_ = x₂ := h h₂
theorem surjOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn f' t s := fun x hx =>
⟨f x, hf hx, h hx⟩
theorem mapsTo (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
MapsTo f' t s := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hs, hx⟩ := hf hy
rwa [← hx, h hs]
lemma _root_.Set.leftInvOn_id (s : Set α) : LeftInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf' : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hg' : LeftInvOn g' g t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
LeftInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s := fun x h =>
calc
(f' ∘ g') ((g ∘ f) x) = f' (f x) := congr_arg f' (hg' (hf h))
_ = x := hf' h
theorem mono (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s) : LeftInvOn f' f s₁ := fun _ hx =>
hf (ht hx)
theorem image_inter' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' s₁ ∩ f '' s := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨by rwa [mem_preimage, hf h], mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩
· rintro _ ⟨h₁, ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨by rwa [← hf h], h⟩
theorem image_inter (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) :
f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' (s₁ ∩ s) ∩ f '' s := by
rw [hf.image_inter']
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono inter_subset_left))
rintro _ ⟨h₁, x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, by rwa [hf hx]⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
theorem image_image (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f' '' (f '' s) = s := by
rw [Set.image_image, image_congr hf, image_id']
theorem image_image' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f' '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).image_image
end LeftInvOn
/-! ### Right inverse -/
section RightInvOn
namespace RightInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : RightInvOn f' f t) : EqOn (f ∘ f') id t :=
h
theorem eq (h : RightInvOn f' f t) {y} (hy : y ∈ t) : f (f' y) = y :=
h hy
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : RightInvOn f' f (f '' s) :=
fun _y ⟨_x, hx, heq⟩ => heq ▸ (congr_arg f <| h.eq hx)
theorem congr_left (h₁ : RightInvOn f₁' f t) (heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) :
RightInvOn f₂' f t :=
h₁.congr_right heq
theorem congr_right (h₁ : RightInvOn f' f₁ t) (hg : MapsTo f' t s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) :
RightInvOn f' f₂ t :=
LeftInvOn.congr_left h₁ hg heq
theorem surjOn (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : SurjOn f s t :=
LeftInvOn.surjOn hf hf'
theorem mapsTo (h : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf : SurjOn f' t s) : MapsTo f s t :=
LeftInvOn.mapsTo h hf
lemma _root_.Set.rightInvOn_id (s : Set α) : RightInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hg : RightInvOn g' g p) (g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
RightInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) p :=
LeftInvOn.comp hg hf g'pt
theorem mono (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : RightInvOn f' f t₁ :=
LeftInvOn.mono hf ht
end RightInvOn
theorem InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn (hf : InjOn f s) (hf' : LeftInvOn f f' t)
(h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f' t s) : RightInvOn f f' s := fun _ h =>
hf (h₂ <| h₁ h) h (hf' (h₁ h))
theorem eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) (h₂ : RightInvOn f₂' f t)
(h : MapsTo f₂' t s) : EqOn f₁' f₂' t := fun y hy =>
calc
f₁' y = (f₁' ∘ f ∘ f₂') y := congr_arg f₁' (h₂ hy).symm
_ = f₂' y := h₁ (h hy)
theorem SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hf' : RightInvOn f f' s) :
LeftInvOn f f' t := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hx, heq⟩ := hf hy
rw [← heq, hf' hx]
end RightInvOn
/-! ### Two-side inverses -/
namespace InvOn
lemma _root_.Set.invOn_id (s : Set α) : InvOn id id s s := ⟨s.leftInvOn_id, s.rightInvOn_id⟩
lemma comp (hf : InvOn f' f s t) (hg : InvOn g' g t p) (fst : MapsTo f s t)
(g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
InvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s p :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 fst, hf.2.comp hg.2 g'pt⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : InvOn f' f s t) : InvOn f f' t s :=
⟨h.right, h.left⟩
theorem mono (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : InvOn f' f s₁ t₁ :=
⟨h.1.mono hs, h.2.mono ht⟩
/-- If functions `f'` and `f` are inverse on `s` and `t`, `f` maps `s` into `t`, and `f'` maps `t`
into `s`, then `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`. The `mapsTo` arguments can be deduced from
`surjOn` statements using `LeftInvOn.mapsTo` and `RightInvOn.mapsTo`. -/
theorem bijOn (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨hf, h.left.injOn, h.right.surjOn hf'⟩
end InvOn
end Set
/-! ### `invFunOn` is a left/right inverse -/
namespace Function
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange`. -/
noncomputable def invFunOn [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (b : β) : α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then Classical.choose h else Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α›
variable [Nonempty α]
theorem invFunOn_pos (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s ∧ f (invFunOn f s b) = b := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
theorem invFunOn_mem (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s :=
(invFunOn_pos h).left
theorem invFunOn_eq (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : f (invFunOn f s b) = b :=
(invFunOn_pos h).right
theorem invFunOn_neg (h : ¬∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b = Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α› := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem invFunOn_apply_mem (h : a ∈ s) : invFunOn f s (f a) ∈ s :=
invFunOn_mem ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
theorem invFunOn_apply_eq (h : a ∈ s) : f (invFunOn f s (f a)) = f a :=
invFunOn_eq ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
end Function
open Function
namespace Set
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun _a ha => h (invFunOn_apply_mem ha) ha (invFunOn_apply_eq ha)
theorem InjOn.invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s₂) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
invFunOn f s₂ '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
h.leftInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' ht
theorem _root_.Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image [Nonempty α]
(h : s ⊆ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s)) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h hx
rw [invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self [Nonempty α] :
InjOn f s ↔ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) = s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.invFunOn_image Subset.rfl, fun h ↦
(Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image h.symm.subset).injOn⟩
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_injOn_image [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Set.InjOn (invFunOn f s) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ he
rw [← invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx, he, invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_image_image_subset [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
(invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) ⊆ s := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨x,hx,rfl⟩, rfl⟩; exact invFunOn_apply_mem hx
theorem SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
RightInvOn (invFunOn f s) f t := fun _y hy => invFunOn_eq <| h hy
theorem BijOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : BijOn f s t) : InvOn (invFunOn f s) f s t :=
⟨h.injOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn, h.surjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
theorem SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
InvOn (invFunOn f s) f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine ⟨?_, h.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : MapsTo (invFunOn f s) t s :=
fun _y hy => mem_preimage.2 <| invFunOn_mem <| h hy
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image'`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image_of_subset [Nonempty α] {r : Set β} (hf : SurjOn f s t)
(hrt : r ⊆ t) : f '' (f.invFunOn s '' r) = r :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' hrt
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
f '' (f.invFunOn s '' t) = t :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image
theorem SurjOn.bijOn_subset [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine h.invOn_invFunOn.bijOn ?_ (mapsTo_image _ _)
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rwa [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset : SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' t := by
constructor
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with (rfl | ht)
· exact fun _ => ⟨∅, empty_subset _, bijOn_empty f⟩
· intro h
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨Classical.choose (h.comap_nonempty ht)⟩
exact ⟨_, h.mapsTo_invFunOn.image_subset, h.bijOn_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨s', hs', hfs'⟩
exact hfs'.surjOn.mono hs' (Subset.refl _)
alias ⟨SurjOn.exists_bijOn_subset, _⟩ := Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
variable (f s)
lemma exists_subset_bijOn : ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' (f '' s) :=
surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset.mp (surjOn_image f s)
lemma exists_image_eq_and_injOn : ∃ u, f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u :=
let ⟨u, _, hfu⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn s f
⟨u, hfu.image_eq, hfu.injOn⟩
variable {f s}
lemma exists_image_eq_injOn_of_subset_range (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
∃ s, f '' s = t ∧ InjOn f s :=
image_preimage_eq_of_subset ht ▸ exists_image_eq_and_injOn _ _
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t` and a set `t'` is contained in the image of some `s₁ ⊇ s`,
then `s₁` has a subset containing `s` that `f` maps bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend_of_subset {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (hss₁ : s ⊆ s₁) (htt' : t ⊆ t')
(ht' : SurjOn f s₁ t') : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ s₁ ∧ Set.BijOn f s' t' := by
obtain ⟨r, hrss, hbij⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn ((s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t') \ f ⁻¹' t) f
rw [image_diff_preimage, image_inter_preimage] at hbij
refine ⟨s ∪ r, subset_union_left, ?_, ?_, ?_, fun y hyt' ↦ ?_⟩
· exact union_subset hss₁ <| hrss.trans <| diff_subset.trans inter_subset_left
· rw [mapsTo', image_union, hbij.image_eq, h.image_eq, union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨htt', diff_subset.trans inter_subset_right⟩
· rw [injOn_union, and_iff_right h.injOn, and_iff_right hbij.injOn]
· refine fun x hxs y hyr hxy ↦ (hrss hyr).2 ?_
rw [← h.image_eq]
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
exact (subset_diff.1 hrss).2.symm.mono_left h.mapsTo
rw [image_union, h.image_eq, hbij.image_eq, union_diff_self]
exact .inr ⟨ht' hyt', hyt'⟩
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t`, and `t'` is a superset of `t` contained in the range of `f`,
then `f` maps some superset of `s` bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (htt' : t ⊆ t') (ht' : t' ⊆ range f) :
∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ BijOn f s' t' := by
simpa using h.exists_extend_of_subset (subset_univ s) htt' (by simpa [SurjOn])
theorem InjOn.exists_subset_injOn_subset_range_eq {r : Set α} (hinj : InjOn f r) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
∃ u : Set α, r ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hru, hus, h⟩ := hinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hrs
(image_subset f hrs) Subset.rfl
exact ⟨u, hru, hus, h.image_eq, h.injOn⟩
theorem preimage_invFun_of_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∈ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [mem_preimage, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, mem_range_self, not_true, or_false,
leftInverse_invFun hf _, hf.mem_set_image]
· simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, hx, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, not_false_iff, or_true]
theorem preimage_invFun_of_not_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∉ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· rw [mem_preimage, leftInverse_invFun hf, hf.mem_set_image]
· have : x ∉ f '' s := fun h' => hx (image_subset_range _ _ h')
simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, this]
lemma BijOn.symm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn g t s :=
⟨h.2.mapsTo hf.surjOn, h.1.injOn, h.2.surjOn hf.mapsTo⟩
lemma bijOn_comm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) : BijOn f s t ↔ BijOn g t s :=
⟨BijOn.symm h, BijOn.symm h.symm⟩
end Set
namespace Function
open Set
variable {fa : α → α} {fb : β → β} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {s t : Set α}
theorem Injective.comp_injOn (hg : Injective g) (hf : s.InjOn f) : s.InjOn (g ∘ f) :=
hg.injOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem Surjective.surjOn (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : SurjOn f univ s :=
(surjective_iff_surjOn_univ.1 hf).mono (Subset.refl _) (subset_univ _)
theorem LeftInverse.leftInvOn {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) (s : Set β) : LeftInvOn f g s :=
fun x _ => h x
theorem RightInverse.rightInvOn {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) (s : Set α) :
RightInvOn f g s := fun x _ => h x
theorem LeftInverse.rightInvOn_range {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
RightInvOn f g (range g) :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun i => congr_arg g (h i)
namespace Semiconj
theorem mapsTo_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : MapsTo fa s t) : MapsTo fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
fun _y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨fa x, ha hx, h x⟩
theorem mapsTo_image_right {t : Set β} (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
MapsTo f (fa '' s) (fb '' t) :=
mapsTo_image_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hst hx, (h x).symm⟩
theorem mapsTo_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) : MapsTo fb (range f) (range f) := fun _y ⟨x, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨fa x, h x⟩
theorem surjOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : SurjOn fa s t) : SurjOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rintro y ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rcases ha hxt with ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩
rw [h x]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxs)
theorem surjOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Surjective fa) :
SurjOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.surjOn_image (ha.surjOn univ)
theorem injOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : InjOn fa s) (hf : InjOn f (fa '' s)) :
InjOn fb (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ H
simp only [← h.eq] at H
exact congr_arg f (ha hx hy <| hf (mem_image_of_mem fa hx) (mem_image_of_mem fa hy) H)
theorem injOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Injective fa) (hf : InjOn f (range fa)) :
InjOn fb (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ] at *
exact h.injOn_image ha.injOn hf
theorem bijOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : BijOn fa s t) (hf : InjOn f t) :
BijOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo_image ha.mapsTo, h.injOn_image ha.injOn (ha.image_eq.symm ▸ hf),
h.surjOn_image ha.surjOn⟩
theorem bijOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Bijective fa) (hf : Injective f) :
BijOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.bijOn_image (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.1 ha) hf.injOn
theorem mapsTo_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s t : Set β} (hb : MapsTo fb s t) :
MapsTo fa (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := fun x hx => by simp only [mem_preimage, h x, hb hx]
theorem injOn_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s : Set β} (hb : InjOn fb s)
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : InjOn fa (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy H
have := congr_arg f H
rw [h.eq, h.eq] at this
exact hf hx hy (hb hx hy this)
end Semiconj
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : β → Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : ∀ b, γ b) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ i) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) :
(fun j => update g i a (f j)) = fun j => g (f j) :=
(update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' _ _) fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : β → γ) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' g a h
theorem insert_injOn (s : Set α) : sᶜ.InjOn fun a => insert a s := fun _a ha _ _ =>
(insert_inj ha).1
lemma apply_eq_of_range_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {b : β} (h : range f = {b}) (a : α) :
f a = b := by
simpa only [h, mem_singleton_iff] using mem_range_self (f := f) a
end Function
/-! ### Equivalences, permutations -/
namespace Set
variable {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} {g g₁ g₂ : Perm α} {s t : Set α}
protected lemma MapsTo.extendDomain (h : MapsTo g s t) :
MapsTo (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, h ha, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma SurjOn.extendDomain (h : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := h ha
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hb, rfl⟩, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma BijOn.extendDomain (h : BijOn g s t) :
BijOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo.extendDomain, (g.extendDomain f).injective.injOn, h.surjOn.extendDomain⟩
protected lemma LeftInvOn.extendDomain (h : LeftInvOn g₁ g₂ s) :
LeftInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma RightInvOn.extendDomain (h : RightInvOn g₁ g₂ t) :
RightInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma InvOn.extendDomain (h : InvOn g₁ g₂ s t) :
InvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.1.extendDomain, h.2.extendDomain⟩
end Set
namespace Set
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} {s₁ : Set α₁} {s₂ : Set α₂} {t₁ : Set β₁} {t₂ : Set β₂}
{f₁ : α₁ → β₁} {f₂ : α₂ → β₂} {g₁ : β₁ → α₁} {g₂ : β₂ → α₂}
lemma InjOn.prodMap (h₁ : s₁.InjOn f₁) (h₂ : s₂.InjOn f₂) :
(s₁ ×ˢ s₂).InjOn fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2) :=
fun x hx y hy ↦ by simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]; exact And.imp (h₁ hx.1 hy.1) (h₂ hx.2 hy.2)
lemma SurjOn.prodMap (h₁ : SurjOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨a₁, ha₁, hx₁⟩ := h₁ hx.1
obtain ⟨a₂, ha₂, hx₂⟩ := h₂ hx.2
exact ⟨(a₁, a₂), ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, Prod.ext hx₁ hx₂⟩
lemma MapsTo.prodMap (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f₂ s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
lemma BijOn.prodMap (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
BijOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.prodMap h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.prodMap h₂.injOn, h₁.surjOn.prodMap h₂.surjOn⟩
lemma LeftInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : LeftInvOn g₁ f₁ s₁) (h₂ : LeftInvOn g₂ f₂ s₂) :
LeftInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma RightInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : RightInvOn g₁ f₁ t₁) (h₂ : RightInvOn g₂ f₂ t₂) :
RightInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma InvOn.prodMap (h₁ : InvOn g₁ f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : InvOn g₂ f₂ s₂ t₂) :
InvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.1.prodMap h₂.1, h₁.2.prodMap h₂.2⟩
end Set
namespace Equiv
open Set
variable (e : α ≃ β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
lemma bijOn' (h₁ : MapsTo e s t) (h₂ : MapsTo e.symm t s) : BijOn e s t :=
⟨h₁, e.injective.injOn, fun b hb ↦ ⟨e.symm b, h₂ hb, apply_symm_apply _ _⟩⟩
protected lemma bijOn (h : ∀ a, e a ∈ t ↔ a ∈ s) : BijOn e s t :=
e.bijOn' (fun _ ↦ (h _).2) fun b hb ↦ (h _).1 <| by rwa [apply_symm_apply]
lemma invOn : InvOn e e.symm t s :=
⟨e.rightInverse_symm.leftInvOn _, e.leftInverse_symm.leftInvOn _⟩
lemma bijOn_image : BijOn e s (e '' s) := e.injective.injOn.bijOn_image
lemma bijOn_symm_image : BijOn e.symm (e '' s) s := e.bijOn_image.symm e.invOn
variable {e}
@[simp] lemma bijOn_symm : BijOn e.symm t s ↔ BijOn e s t := bijOn_comm e.symm.invOn
alias ⟨_root_.Set.BijOn.of_equiv_symm, _root_.Set.BijOn.equiv_symm⟩ := bijOn_symm
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b : α}
lemma bijOn_swap (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : BijOn (swap a b) s s :=
(swap a b).bijOn fun x ↦ by
obtain rfl | hxa := eq_or_ne x a <;>
obtain rfl | hxb := eq_or_ne x b <;>
simp [*, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 1,362 | 1,363 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Topological study of spaces `Π (n : ℕ), E n`
When `E n` are topological spaces, the space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` is naturally a topological space
(with the product topology). When `E n` are uniform spaces, it also inherits a uniform structure.
However, it does not inherit a canonical metric space structure of the `E n`. Nevertheless, one
can put a noncanonical metric space structure (or rather, several of them). This is done in this
file.
## Main definitions and results
One can define a combinatorial distance on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, as follows:
* `PiNat.cylinder x n` is the set of points `y` with `x i = y i` for `i < n`.
* `PiNat.firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x i ≠ y i`.
* `PiNat.dist x y` is equal to `(1/2) ^ (firstDiff x y)`. It defines a distance
on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, compatible with the topology when the `E n` have the discrete topology.
* `PiNat.metricSpace`: the metric space structure, given by this distance. Not registered as an
instance. This space is a complete metric space.
* `PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity`: the same metric space structure, but adjusting the
uniformity defeqness when the `E n` already have the discrete uniformity. Not registered as an
instance
* `PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat`: the particular case of `ℕ → ℕ`, not registered as an instance.
These results are used to construct continuous functions on `Π n, E n`:
* `PiNat.exists_retraction_of_isClosed`: given a nonempty closed subset `s` of `Π (n : ℕ), E n`,
there exists a retraction onto `s`, i.e., a continuous map from the whole space to `s`
restricting to the identity on `s`.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace`: given any nonempty complete metric
space with second-countable topology, there exists a continuous surjection from `ℕ → ℕ` onto
this space.
One can also put distances on `Π (i : ι), E i` when the spaces `E i` are metric spaces (not discrete
in general), and `ι` is countable.
* `PiCountable.dist` is the distance on `Π i, E i` given by
`dist x y = ∑' i, min (1/2)^(encode i) (dist (x i) (y i))`.
* `PiCountable.metricSpace` is the corresponding metric space structure, adjusted so that
the uniformity is definitionally the product uniformity. Not registered as an instance.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ one_lt_two inv_le_inv₀ zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
/-! ### The firstDiff function -/
open Classical in
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, then `firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x` and `y`
differ. If `x = y`, then by convention we set `firstDiff x x = 0`. -/
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
classical
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
classical
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
/-! ### Cylinders -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, the cylinder set of length `n` around `x`, denoted
`cylinder x n`, is the set of sequences `y` that coincide with `x` on the first `n` symbols, i.e.,
such that `y i = x i` for all `i < n`.
-/
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
section Res
variable {α : Type*}
open List
/-- In the case where `E` has constant value `α`,
the cylinder `cylinder x n` can be identified with the element of `List α`
consisting of the first `n` entries of `x`. See `cylinder_eq_res`.
We call this list `res x n`, the restriction of `x` to `n`. -/
def res (x : ℕ → α) : ℕ → List α
| 0 => nil
| Nat.succ n => x n :: res x n
@[simp]
theorem res_zero (x : ℕ → α) : res x 0 = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_succ (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : res x n.succ = x n :: res x n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_length (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : (res x n).length = n := by induction n <;> simp [*]
/-- The restrictions of `x` and `y` to `n` are equal if and only if `x m = y m` for all `m < n`. -/
theorem res_eq_res {x y : ℕ → α} {n : ℕ} :
res x n = res y n ↔ ∀ ⦃m⦄, m < n → x m = y m := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
intro m hm
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq] at h
rcases hm with hm | hm
· exact ih h.2 hm
rw [hm]
exact h.1
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨h (Nat.lt_succ_self _), ih fun m hm => ?_⟩
exact h (hm.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
theorem res_injective : Injective (@res α) := by
intro x y h
ext n
apply res_eq_res.mp _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
rw [h]
/-- `cylinder x n` is equal to the set of sequences `y` with the same restriction to `n` as `x`. -/
theorem cylinder_eq_res (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = { y | res y n = res x n } := by
ext y
dsimp [cylinder]
rw [res_eq_res]
end Res
/-!
### A distance function on `Π n, E n`
We define a distance function on `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is the first
index at which `x` and `y` differ. When each `E n` has the discrete topology, this distance will
define the right topology on the product space. We do not record a global `Dist` instance nor
a `MetricSpace` instance, as other distances may be used on these spaces, but we register them as
local instances in this section.
-/
open Classical in
/-- The distance function on a product space `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is
the first index at which `x` and `y` differ. -/
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
classical
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv₀, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right₀, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
suffices (∀ i : ℕ, i < n → y i = x i) ↔ n ≤ firstDiff y x by simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
constructor
· intro hy
by_contra! H
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (hy _ H)
· intro h i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le h)
theorem apply_eq_of_dist_lt {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (h : dist x y < (1 / 2) ^ n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ≤ n) : x i = y i := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· rfl
have : n < firstDiff x y := by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne, inv_lt_inv₀, pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀, one_lt_two] using h
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_lt this)
/-- A function to a pseudo-metric-space is `1`-Lipschitz if and only if points in the same cylinder
of length `n` are sent to points within distance `(1/2)^n`.
Not expressed using `LipschitzWith` as we don't have a metric space structure -/
theorem lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder {α : Type*}
[PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : (∀ n, E n) → α} :
(∀ x y : ∀ n, E n, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) ↔
∀ x y n, y ∈ cylinder x n → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro H x y n hxy
apply (H x y).trans
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hxy
· intro H x y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rw [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
apply H x y (firstDiff x y)
rw [firstDiff_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_firstDiff _ _
variable (E)
variable [∀ n, TopologicalSpace (E n)] [∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n)]
theorem isOpen_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : IsOpen (cylinder x n) := by
rw [PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi]
exact isOpen_set_pi (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun a _ => isOpen_discrete _
theorem isTopologicalBasis_cylinders :
IsTopologicalBasis { s : Set (∀ n, E n) | ∃ (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n } := by
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u ⟨x, n, rfl⟩
apply isOpen_cylinder
· intro x u hx u_open
obtain ⟨v, ⟨U, F, -, rfl⟩, xU, Uu⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { S : Set (∀ i : ℕ, E i) | ∃ (U : ∀ i : ℕ, Set (E i)) (F : Finset ℕ),
(∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → U i ∈ { s : Set (E i) | IsOpen s }) ∧ S = (F : Set ℕ).pi U },
x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
(isTopologicalBasis_pi fun n : ℕ => isTopologicalBasis_opens).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx
u_open
rcases Finset.bddAbove F with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨cylinder x (n + 1), ⟨x, n + 1, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder _ _, Subset.trans ?_ Uu⟩
intro y hy
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → y i ∈ U i by simpa
intro i hi
have : y i = x i := mem_cylinder_iff.1 hy i ((hn hi).trans_lt (lt_add_one n))
rw [this]
simp only [Set.mem_pi, Finset.mem_coe] at xU
exact xU i hi
variable {E}
theorem isOpen_iff_dist (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs x hx
| obtain ⟨v, ⟨y, n, rfl⟩, h'x, h's⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { s | ∃ (x : ∀ n : ℕ, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n }, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ s :=
(isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx hs
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 360 | 362 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Alex Keizer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
/-!
This file establishes a `snoc : Vector α n → α → Vector α (n+1)` operation, that appends a single
element to the back of a vector.
It provides a collection of lemmas that show how different `Vector` operations reduce when their
argument is `snoc xs x`.
Also, an alternative, reverse, induction principle is added, that breaks down a vector into
`snoc xs x` for its inductive case. Effectively doing induction from right-to-left
-/
namespace List
namespace Vector
variable {α β σ φ : Type*} {n : ℕ} {x : α} {s : σ} (xs : Vector α n)
/-- Append a single element to the end of a vector -/
def snoc : Vector α n → α → Vector α (n+1) :=
fun xs x => append xs (x ::ᵥ Vector.nil)
/-! ## Simplification lemmas -/
section Simp
variable {y : α}
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cons : (x ::ᵥ xs).snoc y = x ::ᵥ (xs.snoc y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snoc_nil : (nil.snoc x) = x ::ᵥ nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons : reverse (x ::ᵥ xs) = (reverse xs).snoc x := by
cases xs
simp only [reverse, cons, toList_mk, List.reverse_cons, snoc]
congr
|
@[simp]
theorem reverse_snoc : reverse (xs.snoc x) = x ::ᵥ (reverse xs) := by
cases xs
simp only [reverse, snoc, cons, toList_mk]
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Snoc.lean | 48 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 178 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Homotopies
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Study of face maps for the Dold-Kan correspondence
In this file, we obtain the technical lemmas that are used in the file
`Projections.lean` in order to get basic properties of the endomorphisms
`P q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` with respect to face maps (see `Homotopies.lean` for the
role of these endomorphisms in the overall strategy of proof).
The main lemma in this file is `HigherFacesVanish.induction`. It is based
on two technical lemmas `HigherFacesVanish.comp_Hσ_eq` and
`HigherFacesVanish.comp_Hσ_eq_zero`.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Category
CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject Simplicial
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable {X : SimplicialObject C}
/-- A morphism `φ : Y ⟶ X _⦋n+1⦌` satisfies `HigherFacesVanish q φ`
when the compositions `φ ≫ X.δ j` are `0` for `j ≥ max 1 (n+2-q)`. When `q ≤ n+1`,
it basically means that the composition `φ ≫ X.δ j` are `0` for the `q` highest
possible values of a nonzero `j`. Otherwise, when `q ≥ n+2`, all the compositions
`φ ≫ X.δ j` for nonzero `j` vanish. See also the lemma `comp_P_eq_self_iff` in
`Projections.lean` which states that `HigherFacesVanish q φ` is equivalent to
the identity `φ ≫ (P q).f (n+1) = φ`. -/
def HigherFacesVanish {Y : C} {n : ℕ} (q : ℕ) (φ : Y ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌) : Prop :=
∀ j : Fin (n + 1), n + 1 ≤ (j : ℕ) + q → φ ≫ X.δ j.succ = 0
namespace HigherFacesVanish
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_δ_eq_zero {Y : C} {n : ℕ} {q : ℕ} {φ : Y ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌} (v : HigherFacesVanish q φ)
(j : Fin (n + 2)) (hj₁ : j ≠ 0) (hj₂ : n + 2 ≤ (j : ℕ) + q) : φ ≫ X.δ j = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := Fin.eq_succ_of_ne_zero hj₁
| apply v i
simp only [Fin.val_succ] at hj₂
omega
theorem of_succ {Y : C} {n q : ℕ} {φ : Y ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌} (v : HigherFacesVanish (q + 1) φ) :
HigherFacesVanish q φ := fun j hj => v j (by simpa only [← add_assoc] using le_add_right hj)
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Faces.lean | 53 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
/-!
# Maps (semi)conjugating a shift to a shift
Denote by $S^1$ the unit circle `UnitAddCircle`.
A common way to study a self-map $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree `1`
is to lift it to a map $\tilde f\colon \mathbb R\to \mathbb R$
such that $\tilde f(x + 1) = \tilde f(x)+1$ for all `x`.
In this file we define a structure and a typeclass
for bundled maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
We use parameters `a` and `b` instead of `1` to accommodate for two use cases:
- maps between circles of different lengths;
- self-maps $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree other than one,
including orientation-reversing maps.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Function Set
/-- A bundled map `f : G → H` such that `f (x + a) = f x + b` for all `x`,
denoted as `f: G →+c[a, b] H`.
One can think about `f` as a lift to `G` of a map between two `AddCircle`s. -/
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
/-- The underlying function of an `AddConstMap`.
Use automatic coercion to function instead. -/
protected toFun : G → H
/-- An `AddConstMap` satisfies `f (x + a) = f x + b`. Use `map_add_const` instead. -/
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
/-- Typeclass for maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
Note that `a` and `b` are `outParam`s,
so one should not add instances like
`[AddConstMapClass F G H a b] : AddConstMapClass F G H (-a) (-b)`. -/
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) [FunLike F G H] : Prop where
/-- A map of `AddConstMapClass` class semiconjugates shift by `a` to the shift by `b`:
`∀ x, f (x + a) = f x + b`. -/
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
/-!
### Properties of `AddConstMapClass` maps
In this section we prove properties like `f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b`.
-/
scoped [AddConstMapClass] attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} [FunLike F G H] {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by simp [← map_add_nsmul]
theorem map_add_one [AddMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x + 1) = f x + b := map_add_const f x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + ofNat(n)) = f x + (ofNat(n) : ℕ) • b :=
map_add_nat' f x n
theorem map_add_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_add_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + ofNat(n)) = f x + ofNat(n) := map_add_nat f x n
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_const [AddZeroClass G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
f a = f 0 + b := by
simpa using map_add_const f 0
theorem map_one [AddZeroClass G] [One G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b] (f : F) :
f 1 = f 0 + b :=
map_const f
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_nsmul_const [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nsmul f 0 n
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nat' f 0 n
theorem map_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (ofNat(n)) = f 0 + (ofNat(n) : ℕ) • b :=
map_nat' f n
theorem map_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n := by simp
theorem map_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f ofNat(n) = f 0 + ofNat(n) := map_nat f n
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_const_add [AddCommMagma G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (a + x) = f x + b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_const]
theorem map_one_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (1 + x) = f x + b := map_const_add f x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_nsmul_add [AddCommMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (n • a + x) = f x + n • b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_nsmul]
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_nat_add' [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using map_nsmul_add f n x
theorem map_ofNat_add' [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (x : G) :
f (ofNat(n) + x) = f x + ofNat(n) • b :=
map_nat_add' f n x
theorem map_nat_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_ofNat_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (x : G) :
f (ofNat(n) + x) = f x + ofNat(n) :=
map_nat_add f n x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_sub_nsmul [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n • a) = f x - n • b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sub_add_cancel x (n • a), map_add_nsmul, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_sub_const [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x - a) = f x - b := by
simpa using map_sub_nsmul f x 1
theorem map_sub_one [AddGroup G] [One G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x - 1) = f x - b :=
map_sub_const f x
| @[scoped simp]
theorem map_sub_nat' [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n • b := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 175 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Bhavik Mehta, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Absorbs
/-!
# Local convexity
This file defines absorbent and balanced sets.
An absorbent set is one that "surrounds" the origin. The idea is made precise by requiring that any
point belongs to all large enough scalings of the set. This is the vector world analog of a
topological neighborhood of the origin.
A balanced set is one that is everywhere around the origin. This means that `a • s ⊆ s` for all `a`
of norm less than `1`.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Absorbs`: A set `s` absorbs a set `t` if all large scalings of `s` contain `t`.
* `Absorbent`: A set `s` is absorbent if every point eventually belongs to all large scalings of
`s`.
* `Balanced`: A set `s` is balanced if `a • s ⊆ s` for all `a` of norm less than `1`.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
absorbent, balanced, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
open Set
open Pointwise Topology
variable {𝕜 𝕝 E F : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] {s A B : Set E}
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A set `A` is balanced if `a • A` is contained in `A` whenever `a` has norm at most `1`. -/
def Balanced (A : Set E) :=
∀ a : 𝕜, ‖a‖ ≤ 1 → a • A ⊆ A
lemma absorbs_iff_norm : Absorbs 𝕜 A B ↔ ∃ r, ∀ c : 𝕜, r ≤ ‖c‖ → B ⊆ c • A :=
Filter.atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm.eventually_iff.trans <| by simp only [true_and]; rfl
alias ⟨_, Absorbs.of_norm⟩ := absorbs_iff_norm
lemma Absorbs.exists_pos (h : Absorbs 𝕜 A B) : ∃ r > 0, ∀ c : 𝕜, r ≤ ‖c‖ → B ⊆ c • A :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr⟩ := (Filter.atTop_basis' 1).cobounded_of_norm.eventually_iff.1 h
⟨r, one_pos.trans_le hr₁, hr⟩
theorem balanced_iff_smul_mem : Balanced 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃a : 𝕜⦄, ‖a‖ ≤ 1 → ∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ s → a • x ∈ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _a _ha => smul_set_subset_iff
alias ⟨Balanced.smul_mem, _⟩ := balanced_iff_smul_mem
theorem balanced_iff_closedBall_smul : Balanced 𝕜 s ↔ Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) 1 • s ⊆ s := by
simp [balanced_iff_smul_mem, smul_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem balanced_empty : Balanced 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ _ => by rw [smul_set_empty]
@[simp]
theorem balanced_univ : Balanced 𝕜 (univ : Set E) := fun _a _ha => subset_univ _
theorem Balanced.union (hA : Balanced 𝕜 A) (hB : Balanced 𝕜 B) : Balanced 𝕜 (A ∪ B) := fun _a ha =>
smul_set_union.subset.trans <| union_subset_union (hA _ ha) <| hB _ ha
theorem Balanced.inter (hA : Balanced 𝕜 A) (hB : Balanced 𝕜 B) : Balanced 𝕜 (A ∩ B) := fun _a ha =>
smul_set_inter_subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter (hA _ ha) <| hB _ ha
theorem balanced_iUnion {f : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, Balanced 𝕜 (f i)) : Balanced 𝕜 (⋃ i, f i) :=
fun _a ha => (smul_set_iUnion _ _).subset.trans <| iUnion_mono fun _ => h _ _ ha
theorem balanced_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set E} (h : ∀ i j, Balanced 𝕜 (f i j)) :
Balanced 𝕜 (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
balanced_iUnion fun _ => balanced_iUnion <| h _
theorem Balanced.sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, Balanced 𝕜 s) : Balanced 𝕜 (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ => (smul_set_sInter_subset ..).trans (fun _ _ => by aesop)
theorem balanced_iInter {f : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, Balanced 𝕜 (f i)) : Balanced 𝕜 (⋂ i, f i) :=
fun _a ha => (smul_set_iInter_subset _ _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => h _ _ ha
theorem balanced_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set E} (h : ∀ i j, Balanced 𝕜 (f i j)) :
Balanced 𝕜 (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
balanced_iInter fun _ => balanced_iInter <| h _
theorem Balanced.mulActionHom_preimage [SMul 𝕜 F] {s : Set F} (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s)
(f : E →[𝕜] F) : Balanced 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) := fun a ha x ⟨y,⟨hy₁,hy₂⟩⟩ => by
rw [mem_preimage, ← hy₂, map_smul]
exact hs a ha (smul_mem_smul_set hy₁)
variable [SMul 𝕝 E] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕝 E]
theorem Balanced.smul (a : 𝕝) (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) : Balanced 𝕜 (a • s) := fun _b hb =>
(smul_comm _ _ _).subset.trans <| smul_set_mono <| hs _ hb
end SMul
section Module
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
theorem Balanced.neg : Balanced 𝕜 s → Balanced 𝕜 (-s) :=
forall₂_imp fun _ _ h => (smul_set_neg _ _).subset.trans <| neg_subset_neg.2 h
@[simp]
theorem balanced_neg : Balanced 𝕜 (-s) ↔ Balanced 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg s ▸ h.neg, fun h ↦ h.neg⟩
theorem Balanced.neg_mem_iff [NormOneClass 𝕜] (h : Balanced 𝕜 s) {x : E} : -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun hx ↦ by simpa using h.smul_mem (a := -1) (by simp) hx,
fun hx ↦ by simpa using h.smul_mem (a := -1) (by simp) hx⟩
theorem Balanced.neg_eq [NormOneClass 𝕜] (h : Balanced 𝕜 s) : -s = s :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ h.neg_mem_iff
theorem Balanced.add (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (ht : Balanced 𝕜 t) : Balanced 𝕜 (s + t) := fun _a ha =>
(smul_add _ _ _).subset.trans <| add_subset_add (hs _ ha) <| ht _ ha
theorem Balanced.sub (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (ht : Balanced 𝕜 t) : Balanced 𝕜 (s - t) := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hs.add ht.neg
theorem balanced_zero : Balanced 𝕜 (0 : Set E) := fun _a _ha => (smul_zero _).subset
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section NormedDivisionRing
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
theorem absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero :
Absorbs 𝕜 s t ↔ ∀ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝[≠] 0, MapsTo (c • ·) t s := by
rw [absorbs_iff_eventually_cobounded_mapsTo, ← Filter.inv_cobounded₀]; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")]
alias absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsWithin_zero := absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero
alias ⟨Absorbs.eventually_nhdsNE_zero, _⟩ := absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")]
alias Absorbs.eventually_nhdsWithin_zero := Absorbs.eventually_nhdsNE_zero
theorem absorbent_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero :
Absorbent 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ x : E, ∀ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝[≠] 0, c • x ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun x ↦ by simp only [absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero, mapsTo_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")]
alias absorbent_iff_eventually_nhdsWithin_zero := absorbent_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero
alias ⟨Absorbent.eventually_nhdsNE_zero, _⟩ := absorbent_iff_eventually_nhdsWithin_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")]
alias Absorbent.eventually_nhdsWithin_zero := Absorbent.eventually_nhdsNE_zero
theorem absorbs_iff_eventually_nhds_zero (h₀ : 0 ∈ s) :
Absorbs 𝕜 s t ↔ ∀ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, MapsTo (c • ·) t s := by
rw [← nhdsNE_sup_pure, Filter.eventually_sup, Filter.eventually_pure,
← absorbs_iff_eventually_nhdsNE_zero, and_iff_left]
intro x _
simpa only [zero_smul]
theorem Absorbs.eventually_nhds_zero (h : Absorbs 𝕜 s t) (h₀ : 0 ∈ s) :
∀ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, MapsTo (c • ·) t s :=
(absorbs_iff_eventually_nhds_zero h₀).1 h
variable [NormedRing 𝕝] [Module 𝕜 𝕝] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 𝕝] [SMulWithZero 𝕝 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕝 E]
{a b : 𝕜} {x : E}
/-- Scalar multiplication (by possibly different types) of a balanced set is monotone. -/
theorem Balanced.smul_mono (hs : Balanced 𝕝 s) {a : 𝕝} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖) : a • s ⊆ b • s := by
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· rw [norm_zero, norm_le_zero_iff] at h
simp only [h, ← image_smul, zero_smul, Subset.rfl]
· calc
a • s = b • (b⁻¹ • a) • s := by rw [smul_assoc, smul_inv_smul₀ hb]
_ ⊆ b • s := smul_set_mono <| hs _ <| by
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ h (norm_nonneg _)
theorem Balanced.smul_mem_mono [SMulCommClass 𝕝 𝕜 E] (hs : Balanced 𝕝 s) {b : 𝕝}
(ha : a • x ∈ s) (hba : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖) : b • x ∈ s := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha₀
· simp_all
· calc
(a⁻¹ • b) • a • x ∈ s := by
refine hs.smul_mem ?_ ha
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ hba (norm_nonneg _)
(a⁻¹ • b) • a • x = b • x := by rw [smul_comm, smul_assoc, smul_inv_smul₀ ha₀]
theorem Balanced.subset_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (ha : 1 ≤ ‖a‖) : s ⊆ a • s := by
rw [← @norm_one 𝕜] at ha; simpa using hs.smul_mono ha
theorem Balanced.smul_congr (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (h : ‖a‖ = ‖b‖) : a • s = b • s :=
(hs.smul_mono h.le).antisymm (hs.smul_mono h.ge)
theorem Balanced.smul_eq (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (ha : ‖a‖ = 1) : a • s = s :=
(hs _ ha.le).antisymm <| hs.subset_smul ha.ge
/-- A balanced set absorbs itself. -/
theorem Balanced.absorbs_self (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) : Absorbs 𝕜 s s :=
.of_norm ⟨1, fun _ => hs.subset_smul⟩
end NormedDivisionRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s A : Set E} {x : E} {a b : 𝕜}
theorem Balanced.smul_mem_iff (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (h : ‖a‖ = ‖b‖) : a • x ∈ s ↔ b • x ∈ s :=
⟨(hs.smul_mem_mono · h.ge), (hs.smul_mem_mono · h.le)⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- Every neighbourhood of the origin is absorbent. -/
theorem absorbent_nhds_zero (hA : A ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E)) : Absorbent 𝕜 A :=
absorbent_iff_inv_smul.2 fun x ↦ Filter.tendsto_inv₀_cobounded.smul tendsto_const_nhds <| by
rwa [zero_smul]
/-- The union of `{0}` with the interior of a balanced set is balanced. -/
theorem Balanced.zero_insert_interior (hA : Balanced 𝕜 A) :
Balanced 𝕜 (insert 0 (interior A)) := by
intro a ha
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_smul_set]
exacts [subset_union_left, ⟨0, Or.inl rfl⟩]
· rw [← image_smul, image_insert_eq, smul_zero]
apply insert_subset_insert
exact ((isOpenMap_smul₀ h).mapsTo_interior <| hA.smul_mem ha).image_subset
/-- The interior of a balanced set is balanced if it contains the origin. -/
protected theorem Balanced.interior (hA : Balanced 𝕜 A) (h : (0 : E) ∈ interior A) :
Balanced 𝕜 (interior A) := by
rw [← insert_eq_self.2 h]
exact hA.zero_insert_interior
protected theorem Balanced.closure (hA : Balanced 𝕜 A) : Balanced 𝕜 (closure A) := fun _a ha =>
(image_closure_subset_closure_image <| continuous_const_smul _).trans <|
closure_mono <| hA _ ha
end NormedField
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
variable [Module ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
protected theorem Balanced.convexHull (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) : Balanced 𝕜 (convexHull ℝ s) := by
suffices Convex ℝ { x | ∀ a : 𝕜, ‖a‖ ≤ 1 → a • x ∈ convexHull ℝ s } by
rw [balanced_iff_smul_mem] at hs ⊢
refine fun a ha x hx => convexHull_min ?_ this hx a ha
exact fun y hy a ha => subset_convexHull ℝ s (hs ha hy)
intro x hx y hy u v hu hv huv a ha
simp only [smul_add, ← smul_comm]
exact convex_convexHull ℝ s (hx a ha) (hy a ha) hu hv huv
end NontriviallyNormedField
section Real
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E] {s : Set E}
theorem balanced_iff_neg_mem (hs : Convex ℝ s) : Balanced ℝ s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h x => h.neg_mem_iff.2, fun h a ha => smul_set_subset_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_le] at ha
rw [show a = -((1 - a) / 2) + (a - -1) / 2 by ring, add_smul, neg_smul, ← smul_neg]
exact hs (h hx) hx (div_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le ha.2) zero_le_two)
(div_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le ha.1) zero_le_two) (by ring)
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Basic.lean | 306 | 311 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Free constructions
## Main definitions
* `FreeMagma α`: free magma (structure with binary operation without any axioms) over alphabet `α`,
defined inductively, with traversable instance and decidable equality.
* `MagmaAssocQuotient α`: quotient of a magma `α` by the associativity equivalence relation.
* `FreeSemigroup α`: free semigroup over alphabet `α`, defined as a structure with two fields
`head : α` and `tail : List α` (i.e. nonempty lists), with traversable instance and decidable
equality.
* `FreeMagmaAssocQuotientEquiv α`: isomorphism between `MagmaAssocQuotient (FreeMagma α)` and
`FreeSemigroup α`.
* `FreeMagma.lift`: the universal property of the free magma, expressing its adjointness.
-/
universe u v l
-- Disable generation of `sizeOf_spec` and `injEq`,
-- which are not needed and the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
set_option genInjectivity false in
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAddMagma α` is the free additive magma generated by `α`.
This is an additive magma equipped with a function `FreeAddMagma.of : α → FreeAddMagma α` which has
the following universal property: if `M` is any magma, and `f : α → M` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeAddMagma.of` and a unique additive homomorphism
`FreeAddMagma.lift f : FreeAddMagma α →ₙ+ M`.
A typical element of `FreeAddMagma α` is a formal non-associative sum of
elements of `α`. For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x + ((y + y) + x)` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAddMagma α`.
One can think of `FreeAddMagma α` as the type of binary trees with leaves labelled by `α`.
In general, no pair of distinct elements in `FreeAddMagma α` will commute.
-/
inductive FreeAddMagma (α : Type u) : Type u
| of : α → FreeAddMagma α
| add : FreeAddMagma α → FreeAddMagma α → FreeAddMagma α
deriving DecidableEq
compile_inductive% FreeAddMagma
-- Disable generation of `sizeOf_spec` and `injEq`,
-- which are not needed and the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
set_option genInjectivity false in
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeMagma α` is the free magma generated by `α`.
This is a magma equipped with a function `FreeMagma.of : α → FreeMagma α` which has
the following universal property: if `M` is any magma, and `f : α → M` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeMagma.of` and a unique multiplicative homomorphism
`FreeMagma.lift f : FreeMagma α →ₙ* M`.
A typical element of `FreeMagma α` is a formal non-associative product of
elements of `α`. For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x * ((y * y) * x)` is a
"typical" element of `FreeMagma α`.
One can think of `FreeMagma α` as the type of binary trees with leaves labelled by `α`.
In general, no pair of distinct elements in `FreeMagma α` will commute.
-/
@[to_additive]
inductive FreeMagma (α : Type u) : Type u
| of : α → FreeMagma α
| mul : FreeMagma α → FreeMagma α → FreeMagma α
deriving DecidableEq
compile_inductive% FreeMagma
namespace FreeMagma
variable {α : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (FreeMagma α) := ⟨of default⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (FreeMagma α) := ⟨FreeMagma.mul⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq (x y : FreeMagma α) : mul x y = x * y := rfl
/-- Recursor for `FreeMagma` using `x * y` instead of `FreeMagma.mul x y`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator)
"Recursor for `FreeAddMagma` using `x + y` instead of `FreeAddMagma.add x y`."]
def recOnMul {C : FreeMagma α → Sort l} (x) (ih1 : ∀ x, C (of x))
(ih2 : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C x :=
FreeMagma.recOn x ih1 ih2
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100)]
theorem hom_ext {β : Type v} [Mul β] {f g : FreeMagma α →ₙ* β} (h : f ∘ of = g ∘ of) : f = g :=
(DFunLike.ext _ _) fun x ↦ recOnMul x (congr_fun h) <| by intros; simp only [map_mul, *]
end FreeMagma
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to a magma homomorphism `FreeMagma α → β` given a magma `β`. -/
def FreeMagma.liftAux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Mul β] (f : α → β) : FreeMagma α → β
| FreeMagma.of x => f x
| x * y => liftAux f x * liftAux f y
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to an additive magma homomorphism `FreeAddMagma α → β` given
an additive magma `β`. -/
def FreeAddMagma.liftAux {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Add β] (f : α → β) : FreeAddMagma α → β
| FreeAddMagma.of x => f x
| x + y => liftAux f x + liftAux f y
attribute [to_additive existing] FreeMagma.liftAux
namespace FreeMagma
section lift
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Mul β] (f : α → β)
/-- The universal property of the free magma expressing its adjointness. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply)
"The universal property of the free additive magma expressing its adjointness."]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ (FreeMagma α →ₙ* β) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := liftAux f
map_mul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
invFun F := F ∘ of
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv F := by ext; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of (x) : lift f (of x) = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of : lift f ∘ of = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of' (f : FreeMagma α →ₙ* β) : lift (f ∘ of) = f := lift.apply_symm_apply f
end lift
section Map
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
/-- The unique magma homomorphism `FreeMagma α →ₙ* FreeMagma β` that sends
each `of x` to `of (f x)`. -/
@[to_additive "The unique additive magma homomorphism `FreeAddMagma α → FreeAddMagma β` that sends
each `of x` to `of (f x)`."]
def map (f : α → β) : FreeMagma α →ₙ* FreeMagma β := lift (of ∘ f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_of (x) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
end Map
section Category
variable {α β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Monad FreeMagma where
pure := of
bind x f := lift f x
/-- Recursor on `FreeMagma` using `pure` instead of `of`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "Recursor on `FreeAddMagma` using `pure` instead of `of`."]
protected def recOnPure {C : FreeMagma α → Sort l} (x) (ih1 : ∀ x, C (pure x))
(ih2 : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C x :=
FreeMagma.recOnMul x ih1 ih2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (x) : (f <$> pure x : FreeMagma β) = pure (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul' (f : α → β) (x y : FreeMagma α) : f <$> (x * y) = f <$> x * f <$> y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_bind (f : α → FreeMagma β) (x) : pure x >>= f = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_bind (f : α → FreeMagma β) (x y : FreeMagma α) : x * y >>= f = (x >>= f) * (y >>= f) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_seq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {x : FreeMagma α} : pure f <*> x = f <$> x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_seq {α β : Type u} {f g : FreeMagma (α → β)} {x : FreeMagma α} :
f * g <*> x = (f <*> x) * (g <*> x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance instLawfulMonad : LawfulMonad FreeMagma.{u} := LawfulMonad.mk'
(pure_bind := fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g ↦ FreeMagma.recOnPure x (fun _ ↦ rfl) fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [mul_bind, mul_bind, mul_bind, ih1, ih2])
(id_map := fun x ↦ FreeMagma.recOnPure x (fun _ ↦ rfl) fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [map_mul', ih1, ih2])
end Category
end FreeMagma
/-- `FreeMagma` is traversable. -/
protected def FreeMagma.traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [Applicative m] {α β : Type u}
(F : α → m β) : FreeMagma α → m (FreeMagma β)
| FreeMagma.of x => FreeMagma.of <$> F x
| x * y => (· * ·) <$> x.traverse F <*> y.traverse F
/-- `FreeAddMagma` is traversable. -/
protected def FreeAddMagma.traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [Applicative m] {α β : Type u}
(F : α → m β) : FreeAddMagma α → m (FreeAddMagma β)
| FreeAddMagma.of x => FreeAddMagma.of <$> F x
| x + y => (· + ·) <$> x.traverse F <*> y.traverse F
attribute [to_additive existing] FreeMagma.traverse
namespace FreeMagma
variable {α : Type u}
section Category
variable {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Traversable FreeMagma := ⟨@FreeMagma.traverse⟩
variable {m : Type u → Type u} [Applicative m] (F : α → m β)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem traverse_pure (x) : traverse F (pure x : FreeMagma α) = pure <$> F x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem traverse_pure' : traverse F ∘ pure = fun x ↦ (pure <$> F x : m (FreeMagma β)) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem traverse_mul (x y : FreeMagma α) :
traverse F (x * y) = (· * ·) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem traverse_mul' :
Function.comp (traverse F) ∘ (HMul.hMul : FreeMagma α → FreeMagma α → FreeMagma α) = fun x y ↦
(· * ·) <$> traverse F x <*> traverse F y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem traverse_eq (x) : FreeMagma.traverse F x = traverse F x := rfl
-- This is not a simp lemma because the left-hand side is not in simp normal form.
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_map_seq (x y : FreeMagma α) :
((· * ·) <$> x <*> y : Id (FreeMagma α)) = (x * y : FreeMagma α) := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : LawfulTraversable FreeMagma.{u} :=
{ instLawfulMonad with
id_traverse := fun x ↦
FreeMagma.recOnPure x (fun _ ↦ rfl) fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, mul_map_seq]
comp_traverse := fun f g x ↦
FreeMagma.recOnPure x
(fun x ↦ by simp only [Function.comp_def, traverse_pure, traverse_pure', functor_norm])
(fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, traverse_mul]
simp [Functor.Comp.map_mk, Functor.map_map, Function.comp_def, Comp.seq_mk, seq_map_assoc,
map_seq, traverse_mul])
naturality := fun η α β f x ↦
FreeMagma.recOnPure x
(fun x ↦ by simp only [traverse_pure, functor_norm, Function.comp_apply])
(fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by simp only [traverse_mul, functor_norm, ih1, ih2])
traverse_eq_map_id := fun f x ↦
FreeMagma.recOnPure x (fun _ ↦ rfl) fun x y ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [traverse_mul, ih1, ih2, map_mul', mul_map_seq]; rfl }
end Category
end FreeMagma
/-- Representation of an element of a free magma. -/
protected def FreeMagma.repr {α : Type u} [Repr α] : FreeMagma α → Lean.Format
| FreeMagma.of x => repr x
| x * y => "( " ++ x.repr ++ " * " ++ y.repr ++ " )"
/-- Representation of an element of a free additive magma. -/
protected def FreeAddMagma.repr {α : Type u} [Repr α] : FreeAddMagma α → Lean.Format
| FreeAddMagma.of x => repr x
| x + y => "( " ++ x.repr ++ " + " ++ y.repr ++ " )"
attribute [to_additive existing] FreeMagma.repr
@[to_additive]
instance {α : Type u} [Repr α] : Repr (FreeMagma α) := ⟨fun o _ => FreeMagma.repr o⟩
/-- Length of an element of a free magma. -/
def FreeMagma.length {α : Type u} : FreeMagma α → ℕ
| FreeMagma.of _x => 1
| x * y => x.length + y.length
/-- Length of an element of a free additive magma. -/
def FreeAddMagma.length {α : Type u} : FreeAddMagma α → ℕ
| FreeAddMagma.of _x => 1
| x + y => x.length + y.length
attribute [to_additive existing (attr := simp)] FreeMagma.length
/-- The length of an element of a free magma is positive. -/
@[to_additive "The length of an element of a free additive magma is positive."]
lemma FreeMagma.length_pos {α : Type u} (x : FreeMagma α) : 0 < x.length :=
match x with
| FreeMagma.of _ => Nat.succ_pos 0
| mul y z => Nat.add_pos_left (length_pos y) z.length
/-- Associativity relations for an additive magma. -/
inductive AddMagma.AssocRel (α : Type u) [Add α] : α → α → Prop
| intro : ∀ x y z, AddMagma.AssocRel α (x + y + z) (x + (y + z))
| left : ∀ w x y z, AddMagma.AssocRel α (w + (x + y + z)) (w + (x + (y + z)))
/-- Associativity relations for a magma. -/
@[to_additive AddMagma.AssocRel "Associativity relations for an additive magma."]
inductive Magma.AssocRel (α : Type u) [Mul α] : α → α → Prop
| intro : ∀ x y z, Magma.AssocRel α (x * y * z) (x * (y * z))
| left : ∀ w x y z, Magma.AssocRel α (w * (x * y * z)) (w * (x * (y * z)))
namespace Magma
/-- Semigroup quotient of a magma. -/
@[to_additive AddMagma.FreeAddSemigroup "Additive semigroup quotient of an additive magma."]
def AssocQuotient (α : Type u) [Mul α] : Type u :=
Quot <| AssocRel α
namespace AssocQuotient
variable {α : Type u} [Mul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem quot_mk_assoc (x y z : α) : Quot.mk (AssocRel α) (x * y * z) = Quot.mk _ (x * (y * z)) :=
Quot.sound (AssocRel.intro _ _ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem quot_mk_assoc_left (x y z w : α) :
Quot.mk (AssocRel α) (x * (y * z * w)) = Quot.mk _ (x * (y * (z * w))) :=
Quot.sound (AssocRel.left _ _ _ _)
@[to_additive]
instance : Semigroup (AssocQuotient α) where
mul x y := by
refine Quot.liftOn₂ x y (fun x y ↦ Quot.mk _ (x * y)) ?_ ?_
· rintro a b₁ b₂ (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩) <;> simp only
· exact quot_mk_assoc_left _ _ _ _
· rw [← quot_mk_assoc, quot_mk_assoc_left, quot_mk_assoc]
· rintro a₁ a₂ b (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩) <;> simp only
· simp only [quot_mk_assoc, quot_mk_assoc_left]
· rw [quot_mk_assoc, quot_mk_assoc, quot_mk_assoc_left, quot_mk_assoc_left,
quot_mk_assoc_left, ← quot_mk_assoc c d, ← quot_mk_assoc c d, quot_mk_assoc_left]
mul_assoc x y z :=
Quot.induction_on₃ x y z fun a b c ↦ quot_mk_assoc a b c
/-- Embedding from magma to its free semigroup. -/
@[to_additive "Embedding from additive magma to its free additive semigroup."]
def of : α →ₙ* AssocQuotient α where toFun := Quot.mk _; map_mul' _x _y := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (AssocQuotient α) := ⟨of default⟩
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator)]
protected theorem induction_on {C : AssocQuotient α → Prop} (x : AssocQuotient α)
(ih : ∀ x, C (of x)) : C x := Quot.induction_on x ih
section lift
variable {β : Type v} [Semigroup β] (f : α →ₙ* β)
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100)]
theorem hom_ext {f g : AssocQuotient α →ₙ* β} (h : f.comp of = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(DFunLike.ext _ _) fun x => AssocQuotient.induction_on x <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- Lifts a magma homomorphism `α → β` to a semigroup homomorphism `Magma.AssocQuotient α → β`
given a semigroup `β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply) "Lifts an additive magma homomorphism `α → β` to an
additive semigroup homomorphism `AddMagma.AssocQuotient α → β` given an additive semigroup `β`."]
def lift : (α →ₙ* β) ≃ (AssocQuotient α →ₙ* β) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦
Quot.liftOn x f <| by rintro a b (⟨c, d, e⟩ | ⟨c, d, e, f⟩) <;> simp only [map_mul, mul_assoc]
map_mul' := fun x y ↦ Quot.induction_on₂ x y (map_mul f) }
invFun f := f.comp of
left_inv _ := (DFunLike.ext _ _) fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv _ := hom_ext <| (DFunLike.ext _ _) fun _ ↦ rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of : (lift f).comp of = f := lift.symm_apply_apply f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of' (f : AssocQuotient α →ₙ* β) : lift (f.comp of) = f := lift.apply_symm_apply f
end lift
variable {β : Type v} [Mul β] (f : α →ₙ* β)
/-- From a magma homomorphism `α →ₙ* β` to a semigroup homomorphism
`Magma.AssocQuotient α →ₙ* Magma.AssocQuotient β`. -/
@[to_additive "From an additive magma homomorphism `α → β` to an additive semigroup homomorphism
`AddMagma.AssocQuotient α → AddMagma.AssocQuotient β`."]
def map : AssocQuotient α →ₙ* AssocQuotient β := lift (of.comp f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_of (x) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
end AssocQuotient
end Magma
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAddSemigroup α` is the free additive semigroup generated by `α`.
This is an additive semigroup equipped with a function
`FreeAddSemigroup.of : α → FreeAddSemigroup α` which has the following universal property:
if `M` is any additive semigroup, and `f : α → M` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeAddSemigroup.of` and a unique semigroup homomorphism
`FreeAddSemigroup.lift f : FreeAddSemigroup α →ₙ+ M`.
A typical element of `FreeAddSemigroup α` is a nonempty formal sum of elements of `α`.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x + y + y + x` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAddSemigroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAddSemigroup α` is also empty, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAddSemigroup α` is isomorphic to `ℕ+`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeAddSemigroup α` is not commutative.
One can think of `FreeAddSemigroup α` as the type of nonempty lists of `α`, with addition
given by concatenation.
-/
structure FreeAddSemigroup (α : Type u) where
/-- The head of the element -/
head : α
/-- The tail of the element -/
tail : List α
compile_inductive% FreeAddSemigroup
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeSemigroup α` is the free semigroup generated by `α`.
This is a semigroup equipped with a function `FreeSemigroup.of : α → FreeSemigroup α` which has
the following universal property: if `M` is any semigroup, and `f : α → M` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeSemigroup.of` and a unique semigroup homomorphism
`FreeSemigroup.lift f : FreeSemigroup α →ₙ* M`.
A typical element of `FreeSemigroup α` is a nonempty formal product of elements of `α`.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x * y * y * x` is a
"typical" element of `FreeSemigroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeSemigroup α` is also empty, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeSemigroup α` is isomorphic to `Multiplicative ℕ+`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeSemigroup α` is not commutative.
One can think of `FreeSemigroup α` as the type of nonempty lists of `α`, with multiplication
given by concatenation.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
structure FreeSemigroup (α : Type u) where
/-- The head of the element -/
head : α
/-- The tail of the element -/
tail : List α
compile_inductive% FreeSemigroup
namespace FreeSemigroup
variable {α : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Semigroup (FreeSemigroup α) where
mul L1 L2 := ⟨L1.1, L1.2 ++ L2.1 :: L2.2⟩
mul_assoc _L1 _L2 _L3 := FreeSemigroup.ext rfl <| List.append_assoc _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem head_mul (x y : FreeSemigroup α) : (x * y).1 = x.1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tail_mul (x y : FreeSemigroup α) : (x * y).2 = x.2 ++ y.1 :: y.2 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_mul_mk (x y : α) (L1 L2 : List α) : mk x L1 * mk y L2 = mk x (L1 ++ y :: L2) := rfl
/-- The embedding `α → FreeSemigroup α`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The embedding `α → FreeAddSemigroup α`."]
def of (x : α) : FreeSemigroup α := ⟨x, []⟩
/-- Length of an element of free semigroup. -/
@[to_additive "Length of an element of free additive semigroup"]
def length (x : FreeSemigroup α) : ℕ := x.tail.length + 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem length_mul (x y : FreeSemigroup α) : (x * y).length = x.length + y.length := by
simp [length, Nat.add_right_comm, List.length, List.length_append]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem length_of (x : α) : (of x).length = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (FreeSemigroup α) := ⟨of default⟩
/-- Recursor for free semigroup using `of` and `*`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator)
"Recursor for free additive semigroup using `of` and `+`."]
protected def recOnMul {C : FreeSemigroup α → Sort l} (x) (ih1 : ∀ x, C (of x))
(ih2 : ∀ x y, C (of x) → C y → C (of x * y)) : C x :=
FreeSemigroup.recOn x fun f s ↦
List.recOn s ih1 (fun hd tl ih f ↦ ih2 f ⟨hd, tl⟩ (ih1 f) (ih hd)) f
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100)]
theorem hom_ext {β : Type v} [Mul β] {f g : FreeSemigroup α →ₙ* β} (h : f ∘ of = g ∘ of) : f = g :=
(DFunLike.ext _ _) fun x ↦
FreeSemigroup.recOnMul x (congr_fun h) fun x y hx hy ↦ by simp only [map_mul, *]
section lift
variable {β : Type v} [Semigroup β] (f : α → β)
/-- Lifts a function `α → β` to a semigroup homomorphism `FreeSemigroup α → β` given
a semigroup `β`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply) "Lifts a function `α → β` to an additive semigroup
homomorphism `FreeAddSemigroup α → β` given an additive semigroup `β`."]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ (FreeSemigroup α →ₙ* β) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ x.2.foldl (fun a b ↦ a * f b) (f x.1)
map_mul' := fun x y ↦ by
simp [head_mul, tail_mul, ← List.foldl_map, List.foldl_append, List.foldl_cons,
List.foldl_assoc] }
invFun f := f ∘ of
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := hom_ext rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of : lift f ∘ of = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_of' (f : FreeSemigroup α →ₙ* β) : lift (f ∘ of) = f := hom_ext rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_of_mul (x y) : lift f (of x * y) = f x * lift f y := by rw [map_mul, lift_of]
end lift
section Map
variable {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
/-- The unique semigroup homomorphism that sends `of x` to `of (f x)`. -/
@[to_additive "The unique additive semigroup homomorphism that sends `of x` to `of (f x)`."]
def map : FreeSemigroup α →ₙ* FreeSemigroup β :=
lift <| of ∘ f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_of (x) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem length_map (x) : (map f x).length = x.length :=
FreeSemigroup.recOnMul x (fun _ ↦ rfl) (fun x y hx hy ↦ by simp only [map_mul, length_mul, *])
end Map
section Category
variable {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Monad FreeSemigroup where
pure := of
bind x f := lift f x
/-- Recursor that uses `pure` instead of `of`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "Recursor that uses `pure` instead of `of`."]
def recOnPure {C : FreeSemigroup α → Sort l} (x) (ih1 : ∀ x, C (pure x))
(ih2 : ∀ x y, C (pure x) → C y → C (pure x * y)) : C x :=
FreeSemigroup.recOnMul x ih1 ih2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (x) : (f <$> pure x : FreeSemigroup β) = pure (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| theorem map_mul' (f : α → β) (x y : FreeSemigroup α) : f <$> (x * y) = f <$> x * f <$> y :=
map_mul (map f) _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Free.lean | 585 | 586 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 374 | 374 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Partial sums of geometric series
This file determines the values of the geometric series $\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i$ and
$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i y^{n-1-i}$ and variants thereof. We also provide some bounds on the
"geometric" sum of `a/b^i` where `a b : ℕ`.
## Main statements
* `geom_sum_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^i=\frac{x^n-x^m}{x-1}$ in a division ring.
* `geom_sum₂_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^iy^{n - 1 - i}=\frac{x^n-y^{n-m}x^m}{x-y}$
in a field.
Several variants are recorded, generalising in particular to the case of a noncommutative ring in
which `x` and `y` commute. Even versions not using division or subtraction, valid in each semiring,
are recorded.
-/
variable {R K : Type*}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
theorem geom_sum_one (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem geom_sum_two {x : R} : ∑ i ∈ range 2, x ^ i = x + 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem zero_geom_sum : ∀ {n}, ∑ i ∈ range n, (0 : R) ^ i = if n = 0 then 0 else 1
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [geom_sum_succ']
simp [zero_geom_sum]
theorem one_geom_sum (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, (1 : R) ^ i = n := by simp
theorem op_geom_sum (x : R) (n : ℕ) : op (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, op x ^ i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum₂ (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ (n - 1 - i) * op x ^ i =
∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ i * op x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at j_in
congr
apply tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right j_in
theorem geom_sum₂_with_one (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * 1 ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i _ => by rw [one_pow, mul_one]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n := by
let f : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun m i : ℕ => (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i)
change (∑ i ∈ range n, (f n) i) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n
| induction n with
| zero => rw [range_zero, sum_empty, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
have f_last : f (n + 1) n = (x + y) ^ n := by
dsimp only [f]
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, Nat.add_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one]
have f_succ : ∀ i, i ∈ range n → f (n + 1) i = y * f n i := fun i hi => by
dsimp only [f]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 88 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (k * i) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (i * k) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (k * j) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (j * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a m = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_left {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd m = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right a m n
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a n = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_right {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd n = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right a n m
theorem gcd_eq_left {i j : ℤ} (H : i ∣ j) : gcd i j = natAbs i :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H))
theorem gcd_eq_right {i j : ℤ} (H : j ∣ i) : gcd i j = natAbs j := by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
theorem ne_zero_of_gcd {x y : ℤ} (hc : gcd x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
rw [hc.left, hc.right, gcd_zero_right, natAbs_zero]
theorem exists_gcd_one {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n' : ℤ, gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd H, (Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_left).symm,
(Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_right).symm⟩
theorem exists_gcd_one' {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ (g : ℕ) (m' n' : ℤ), 0 < g ∧ gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_gcd_one H
⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {m n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) : m ^ k ∣ n ^ k ↔ m ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rwa [← natAbs_dvd_natAbs, ← Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff k0, ← Int.natAbs_pow, ← Int.natAbs_pow,
natAbs_dvd_natAbs]
theorem gcd_dvd_iff {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : gcd a b ∣ n ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, Int.ofNat_mul, gcd_eq_gcd_ab, Int.add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, h]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_left _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right y)
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℤ} (hd_pos : 0 ≤ d) (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℤ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = gcd a b :=
dvd_antisymm hd_pos (ofNat_zero_le (gcd a b)) (dvd_coe_gcd hda hdb)
(hd _ gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a c = 1` then `a ∣ b`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a c = 1) :
a ∣ b := by
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab a c
simp only [hab, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add] at this
have : b * a * gcdA a c + b * c * gcdB a c = b := by simp [mul_assoc, ← Int.mul_add, ← this]
rw [← this]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left a b) _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left habc _)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a b = 1` then `a ∣ c`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a b = 1) :
a ∣ c := by
rw [mul_comm] at habc
exact dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one habc hab
/-- For nonzero integers `a` and `b`, `gcd a b` is the smallest positive natural number that can be
written in the form `a * x + b * y` for some pair of integers `x` and `y` -/
theorem gcd_least_linear {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsLeast { n : ℕ | 0 < n ∧ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y } (a.gcd b) := by
simp_rw [← gcd_dvd_iff]
constructor
· simpa [and_true, dvd_refl, Set.mem_setOf_eq] using gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left b ha
· simp only [lowerBounds, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun n hn_pos hn => Nat.le_of_dvd hn_pos hn
/-! ### lcm -/
theorem lcm_comm (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = lcm j i := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm]
exact Nat.lcm_comm _ _
theorem lcm_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : lcm (lcm i j) k = lcm i (lcm j k) := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]
apply Nat.lcm_assoc
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 0 i = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 0 = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 1 i = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 1 = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_right
theorem coe_lcm_dvd {i j k : ℤ} : i ∣ k → j ∣ k → (lcm i j : ℤ) ∣ k := by
rw [Int.lcm]
intro hi hj
exact natCast_dvd.mpr (Nat.lcm_dvd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hi) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hj))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias lcm_dvd := coe_lcm_dvd
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = natAbs m * n.lcm k := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * natAbs n := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_right]
end Int
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_gcd_eq_one {M : Type*} [Monoid M] (x : M) {m n : ℕ} (hm : x ^ m = 1) (hn : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m.gcd n = 1 := by
rcases m with (rfl | m); · simp [hn]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := IsUnit.of_pow_eq_one hm m.succ_ne_zero
rw [← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, ← Units.val_one (α := M), ← zpow_natCast, ← Units.ext_iff] at *
rw [Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, hn, hm, one_zpow, one_zpow, one_mul]
variable {α : Type*}
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
protected lemma Commute.pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime (hab : Commute a b) (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
a ^ m = b ^ n ↔ ∃ c, a = c ^ n ∧ b = c ^ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩; rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul']⟩
by_cases m = 0; · aesop
by_cases n = 0; · aesop
by_cases hb : b = 0; · exact ⟨0, by aesop⟩
by_cases ha : a = 0; · exact ⟨0, by have := h.symm; aesop⟩
refine ⟨a ^ Nat.gcdB m n * b ^ Nat.gcdA m n, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· refine (pow_one _).symm.trans ?_
conv_lhs => rw [← zpow_natCast, ← hmn, Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab]
simp only [zpow_add₀ ha, zpow_add₀ hb, ← zpow_natCast, (hab.zpow_zpow₀ _ _).mul_zpow,
← zpow_mul, mul_comm (Nat.gcdB m n), mul_comm (Nat.gcdA m n)]
simp only [zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, h]
exact ((Commute.pow_pow (by aesop) _ _).zpow_zpow₀ _ _).symm
end GroupWithZero
section CommGroupWithZero
variable [CommGroupWithZero α] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime (hmn : m.Coprime n) : a ^ m = b ^ n ↔ ∃ c, a = c ^ n ∧ b = c ^ m :=
(Commute.all _ _).pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime hmn
lemma pow_mem_range_pow_of_coprime (hmn : m.Coprime n) (a : α) :
a ^ m ∈ Set.range (· ^ n : α → α) ↔ a ∈ Set.range (· ^ n : α → α) := by
simp [pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime hmn.symm]; aesop
end CommGroupWithZero
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 491 | 493 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Lemmas
/-!
# Smooth bump functions on a smooth manifold
In this file we define `SmoothBumpFunction I c` to be a bundled smooth "bump" function centered at
`c`. It is a structure that consists of two real numbers `0 < rIn < rOut` with small enough `rOut`.
We define a coercion to function for this type, and for `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the function
`⇑f` written in the extended chart at `c` has the following properties:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The actual statements involve (pre)images under `extChartAt I f` and are given as lemmas in the
`SmoothBumpFunction` namespace.
## Tags
manifold, smooth bump function
-/
universe uE uF uH uM
variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M]
open Function Filter Module Set Metric
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
noncomputable section
/-!
### Smooth bump function
In this section we define a structure for a bundled smooth bump function and prove its properties.
-/
variable (I) in
/-- Given a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional space `E`,
`f : SmoothBumpFunction I M` is a smooth function on `M` such that in the extended chart `e` at
`f.c`:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `f.c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `f.c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The structure contains data required to construct a function with these properties. The function is
available as `⇑f` or `f x`. Formal statements of the properties listed above involve some
(pre)images under `extChartAt I f.c` and are given as lemmas in the `SmoothBumpFunction`
namespace. -/
structure SmoothBumpFunction (c : M) extends ContDiffBump (extChartAt I c c) where
closedBall_subset : closedBall (extChartAt I c c) rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target
namespace SmoothBumpFunction
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
/-- The function defined by `f : SmoothBumpFunction c`. Use automatic coercion to function
instead. -/
@[coe] def toFun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c)
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpFunction I c) fun _ => M → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
theorem coe_def : ⇑f = indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) :=
rfl
end FiniteDimensional
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
theorem rOut_pos : 0 < f.rOut :=
f.toContDiffBump.rOut_pos
theorem ball_subset : ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target :=
Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall) f.closedBall_subset
theorem ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target :
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I =
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ (extChartAt I c).target :=
(subset_inter inter_subset_left f.ball_subset).antisymm <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <|
extChartAt_target_subset_range _
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem eqOn_source : EqOn f (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) (chartAt H c).source :=
eqOn_indicator
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c :=
f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <| (chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds hx
theorem one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) ≤ f.rIn) : f x = 1 := by
simp only [f.eqOn_source hs, (· ∘ ·), f.one_of_mem_closedBall hd]
theorem support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f = (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut := by
rw [coe_def, support_indicator, support_comp_eq_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', ← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
f.support_eq]
theorem isOpen_support : IsOpen (support f) := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball
theorem support_eq_symm_image :
support f = (extChartAt I c).symm '' (ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', inter_comm,
ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target]
theorem support_subset_source : support f ⊆ (chartAt H c).source := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I]; exact inter_subset_left
theorem image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support {s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
extChartAt I c '' s =
closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ∩ (extChartAt I c).symm ⁻¹' s := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← extChartAt_source I, ← image_subset_iff] at hs
obtain ⟨hse, hsf⟩ := hs
apply Subset.antisymm
· refine subset_inter (subset_inter (hsf.trans ball_subset_closedBall) ?_) ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, -, rfl⟩; exact mem_range_self _
· rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
exact inter_subset_right
· refine Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ f.closedBall_subset) ?_
rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
theorem mem_Icc : f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
have : f x = 0 ∨ f x = _ := indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _ _
rcases this with h | h <;> rw [h]
exacts [left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, ⟨f.nonneg, f.le_one⟩]
theorem nonneg : 0 ≤ f x :=
f.mem_Icc.1
theorem le_one : f x ≤ 1 :=
f.mem_Icc.2
theorem eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) < f.rIn) : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 := by
filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball) ⟨hs, hd⟩]
rintro z ⟨hzs, hzd⟩
exact f.one_of_dist_le hzs <| le_of_lt hzd
theorem eventuallyEq_one : f =ᶠ[𝓝 c] 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (mem_chart_source _ _) <| by rw [dist_self]; exact f.rIn_pos
@[simp]
theorem eq_one : f c = 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.eq_of_nhds
theorem support_mem_nhds : support f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.mono fun x hx => by rw [hx]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem tsupport_mem_nhds : tsupport f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
mem_of_superset f.support_mem_nhds subset_closure
theorem c_mem_support : c ∈ support f :=
mem_of_mem_nhds f.support_mem_nhds
theorem nonempty_support : (support f).Nonempty :=
⟨c, f.c_mem_support⟩
theorem isCompact_symm_image_closedBall :
IsCompact ((extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I)) :=
((isCompact_closedBall _ _).inter_right I.isClosed_range).image_of_continuousOn <|
(continuousOn_extChartAt_symm _).mono f.closedBall_subset
end FiniteDimensional
/-- Given a smooth bump function `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the closed ball of radius `f.R` is
known to include the support of `f`. These closed balls (in the model normed space `E`) intersected
with `Set.range I` form a basis of `𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I c c)`. -/
theorem nhdsWithin_range_basis :
(𝓝[range I] extChartAt I c c).HasBasis (fun _ : SmoothBumpFunction I c => True) fun f =>
closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I := by
refine ((nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closedBall _).restrict_subset
(extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin _)).to_hasBasis' ?_ ?_
· rintro R ⟨hR0, hsub⟩
exact ⟨⟨⟨R / 2, R, half_pos hR0, half_lt_self hR0⟩, hsub⟩, trivial, Subset.rfl⟩
· exact fun f _ => inter_mem (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ f.rOut_pos)
self_mem_nhdsWithin
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem isClosed_image_of_isClosed {s : Set M} (hsc : IsClosed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
IsClosed (extChartAt I c '' s) := by
rw [f.image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support hs]
refine ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed
((continuousOn_extChartAt_symm _).mono f.closedBall_subset) ?_ hsc
exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closedBall I.isClosed_range
/-- If `f` is a smooth bump function and `s` closed subset of the support of `f` (i.e., of the open
ball of radius `f.rOut`), then there exists `0 < r < f.rOut` such that `s` is a subset of the open
ball of radius `r`. Formally, `s ⊆ e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (ball (e c) r)`, where `e = extChartAt I c`. -/
theorem exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball {s : Set M} (hsc : IsClosed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
∃ r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut,
s ⊆ (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) r := by
set e := extChartAt I c
have : IsClosed (e '' s) := f.isClosed_image_of_isClosed hsc hs
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← image_subset_iff] at hs
rcases exists_pos_lt_subset_ball f.rOut_pos this hs.2 with ⟨r, hrR, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hrR, subset_inter hs.1 (image_subset_iff.1 hr)⟩
/-- Replace `rIn` with another value in the interval `(0, f.rOut)`. -/
@[simps rOut rIn]
def updateRIn (r : ℝ) (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut) : SmoothBumpFunction I c :=
⟨⟨r, f.rOut, hr.1, hr.2⟩, f.closedBall_subset⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_updateRIn {r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut) :
support (f.updateRIn r hr) = support f := by
simp only [support_eq_inter_preimage, updateRIn_rOut]
-- Porting note: was an `Inhabited` instance
instance : Nonempty (SmoothBumpFunction I c) := nhdsWithin_range_basis.nonempty
variable [T2Space M]
theorem isClosed_symm_image_closedBall :
IsClosed ((extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I)) :=
f.isCompact_symm_image_closedBall.isClosed
theorem tsupport_subset_symm_image_closedBall :
tsupport f ⊆ (extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [tsupport, support_eq_symm_image]
| exact closure_minimal (image_subset _ <| inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall)
f.isClosed_symm_image_closedBall
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/BumpFunction.lean | 246 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Finset
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
/-!
# Stabilizer of a set under a pointwise action
This file characterises the stabilizer of a set/finset under the pointwise action of a group.
-/
open Function MulOpposite Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
variable {G H α : Type*}
/-! ### Stabilizer of a set -/
section Set
section Group
variable [Group G] [Group H] [MulAction G α] {a : G} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_empty : stabilizer G (∅ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
Subgroup.coe_eq_univ.1 <| eq_univ_of_forall fun _a ↦ smul_set_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_univ : stabilizer G (Set.univ : Set α) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_singleton (b : α) : stabilizer G ({b} : Set α) = stabilizer G b := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_stabilizer_set {s : Set α} : a ∈ stabilizer G s ↔ ∀ b, a • b ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s := by
refine mem_stabilizer_iff.trans ⟨fun h b ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← (smul_mem_smul_set_iff : a • b ∈ _ ↔ _), h]
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
exact ((MulAction.toPerm a).forall_congr' <| by simp [Iff.comm]).1 h
@[to_additive]
lemma map_stabilizer_le (f : G →* H) (s : Set G) :
(stabilizer G s).map f ≤ stabilizer H (f '' s) := by
rintro a
simp only [Subgroup.mem_map, mem_stabilizer_iff, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro a ha rfl
rw [← image_smul_distrib, ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_mul_self (s : Set G) : (stabilizer G s : Set G) * s = s := by
ext
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨_, (stabilizer G s).one_mem, _, h, one_mul _⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← mem_stabilizer_iff.1 ha]
exact smul_mem_smul_set hb
@[to_additive]
lemma stabilizer_inf_stabilizer_le_stabilizer_apply₂ {f : Set α → Set α → Set α}
(hf : ∀ a : G, a • f s t = f (a • s) (a • t)) :
stabilizer G s ⊓ stabilizer G t ≤ stabilizer G (f s t) := by aesop (add simp [SetLike.le_def])
| @[to_additive]
lemma stabilizer_inf_stabilizer_le_stabilizer_union :
stabilizer G s ⊓ stabilizer G t ≤ stabilizer G (s ∪ t) :=
stabilizer_inf_stabilizer_le_stabilizer_apply₂ fun _ ↦ smul_set_union
| Mathlib/Algebra/Pointwise/Stabilizer.lean | 68 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.EquivalenceGroupAddGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
/-!
# Monomorphisms and epimorphisms in `Group`
In this file, we prove monomorphisms in the category of groups are injective homomorphisms and
epimorphisms are surjective homomorphisms.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
namespace MonoidHom
open QuotientGroup
variable {A : Type u} {B : Type v}
section
variable [Group A] [Group B]
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_cancel {f : A →* B} (h : ∀ u v : f.ker →* A, f.comp u = f.comp v → u = v) :
f.ker = ⊥ := by simpa using congr_arg range (h f.ker.subtype 1 (by aesop_cat))
end
section
variable [CommGroup A] [CommGroup B]
@[to_additive]
theorem range_eq_top_of_cancel {f : A →* B}
(h : ∀ u v : B →* B ⧸ f.range, u.comp f = v.comp f → u = v) : f.range = ⊤ := by
specialize h 1 (QuotientGroup.mk' _) _
· ext1 x
simp only [one_apply, coe_comp, coe_mk', Function.comp_apply]
rw [show (1 : B ⧸ f.range) = (1 : B) from QuotientGroup.mk_one _, QuotientGroup.eq, inv_one,
one_mul]
exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
replace h : (QuotientGroup.mk' f.range).ker = (1 : B →* B ⧸ f.range).ker := by rw [h]
rwa [ker_one, QuotientGroup.ker_mk'] at h
end
end MonoidHom
section
open CategoryTheory
namespace Grp
variable {A B : Grp.{u}} (f : A ⟶ B)
@[to_additive]
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_mono [Mono f] : f.hom.ker = ⊥ :=
MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_of_cancel fun u v h => ConcreteCategory.ext_iff.mp <|
(@cancel_mono _ _ _ _ _ f _ (ofHom u) (ofHom v)).1 <| ConcreteCategory.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem mono_iff_ker_eq_bot : Mono f ↔ f.hom.ker = ⊥ :=
⟨fun _ => ker_eq_bot_of_mono f, fun h =>
ConcreteCategory.mono_of_injective _ <| (MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff f.hom).1 h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mono_iff_injective : Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f :=
Iff.trans (mono_iff_ker_eq_bot f) <| MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff f.hom
namespace SurjectiveOfEpiAuxs
local notation3 "X" => Set.range (· • (f.hom.range : Set B) : B → Set B)
/-- Define `X'` to be the set of all left cosets with an extra point at "infinity".
-/
inductive XWithInfinity
| fromCoset : X → XWithInfinity
| infinity : XWithInfinity
open XWithInfinity Equiv.Perm
local notation "X'" => XWithInfinity f
local notation "∞" => XWithInfinity.infinity
local notation "SX'" => Equiv.Perm X'
instance : SMul B X' where
smul b x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => fromCoset ⟨b • y, by
rw [← y.2.choose_spec, leftCoset_assoc]
let b' : B := y.2.choose
use b * b'⟩
| ∞ => ∞
theorem mul_smul (b b' : B) (x : X') : (b * b') • x = b • b' • x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => by
change fromCoset _ = fromCoset _
simp only [leftCoset_assoc]
| ∞ => rfl
theorem one_smul (x : X') : (1 : B) • x = x :=
match x with
| fromCoset y => by
change fromCoset _ = fromCoset _
simp only [one_leftCoset, Subtype.ext_iff_val]
| ∞ => rfl
theorem fromCoset_eq_of_mem_range {b : B} (hb : b ∈ f.hom.range) :
fromCoset ⟨b • ↑f.hom.range, b, rfl⟩ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
congr
nth_rw 2 [show (f.hom.range : Set B) = (1 : B) • f.hom.range from (one_leftCoset _).symm]
rw [leftCoset_eq_iff, mul_one]
exact Subgroup.inv_mem _ hb
example (G : Type) [Group G] (S : Subgroup G) : Set G := S
theorem fromCoset_ne_of_nin_range {b : B} (hb : b ∉ f.hom.range) :
fromCoset ⟨b • ↑f.hom.range, b, rfl⟩ ≠ fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
intro r
simp only [fromCoset.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq] at r
nth_rw 2 [show (f.hom.range : Set B) = (1 : B) • f.hom.range from (one_leftCoset _).symm] at r
rw [leftCoset_eq_iff, mul_one] at r
exact hb (inv_inv b ▸ Subgroup.inv_mem _ r)
instance : DecidableEq X' :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- Let `τ` be the permutation on `X'` exchanging `f.hom.range` and the point at infinity.
-/
noncomputable def tau : SX' :=
Equiv.swap (fromCoset ⟨↑f.hom.range, ⟨1, one_leftCoset _⟩⟩) ∞
local notation "τ" => tau f
theorem τ_apply_infinity : τ ∞ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ :=
Equiv.swap_apply_right _ _
theorem τ_apply_fromCoset : τ (fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩) = ∞ :=
Equiv.swap_apply_left _ _
theorem τ_apply_fromCoset' (x : B) (hx : x ∈ f.hom.range) :
τ (fromCoset ⟨x • ↑f.hom.range, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩) = ∞ :=
(fromCoset_eq_of_mem_range _ hx).symm ▸ τ_apply_fromCoset _
theorem τ_symm_apply_fromCoset :
Equiv.symm τ (fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩) = ∞ := by
rw [tau, Equiv.symm_swap, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
theorem τ_symm_apply_infinity :
Equiv.symm τ ∞ = fromCoset ⟨f.hom.range, 1, one_leftCoset _⟩ := by
rw [tau, Equiv.symm_swap, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
/-- Let `g : B ⟶ S(X')` be defined as such that, for any `β : B`, `g(β)` is the function sending
point at infinity to point at infinity and sending coset `y` to `β • y`.
-/
def g : B →* SX' where
toFun β :=
{ toFun := fun x => β • x
invFun := fun x => β⁻¹ • x
left_inv := fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]
right_inv := fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel, one_smul] }
map_one' := by
ext
simp [one_smul]
map_mul' b1 b2 := by
ext
simp [mul_smul]
local notation "g" => g f
/-- Define `h : B ⟶ S(X')` to be `τ g τ⁻¹`
-/
def h : B →* SX' where
toFun β := ((τ).symm.trans (g β)).trans τ
| map_one' := by
ext
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/EpiMono.lean | 195 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Indexed product of uniform spaces
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Uniformity Topology
open Filter UniformSpace Function Set
universe u
variable {ι ι' β : Type*} (α : ι → Type u) [U : ∀ i, UniformSpace (α i)] [UniformSpace β]
instance Pi.uniformSpace : UniformSpace (∀ i, α i) :=
UniformSpace.ofCoreEq (⨅ i, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i)).toCore
Pi.topologicalSpace <|
Eq.symm toTopologicalSpace_iInf
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_eq :
Pi.uniformSpace α = ⨅ i, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i) := by
ext : 1; rfl
theorem Pi.uniformity :
𝓤 (∀ i, α i) = ⨅ i : ι, (Filter.comap fun a => (a.1 i, a.2 i)) (𝓤 (α i)) :=
iInf_uniformity
variable {α}
instance [Countable ι] [∀ i, IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α i))] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (∀ i, α i)) := by
rw [Pi.uniformity]
infer_instance
theorem uniformContinuous_pi {β : Type*} [UniformSpace β] {f : β → ∀ i, α i} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous fun x => f x i := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, Pi.uniformity, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
variable (α)
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_proj (i : ι) : UniformContinuous fun a : ∀ i : ι, α i => a i :=
uniformContinuous_pi.1 uniformContinuous_id i
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformContinuous (fun (f : (∀ i, α i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
uniformContinuous_pi.mpr fun j ↦ uniformContinuous_proj α (φ j)
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformContinuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → β) → (ι' → β)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' _ φ
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp' {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, UniformSpace (β i)]
{g : ∀ i, α i → β i} (hg : ∀ i, UniformContinuous (g i)) :
UniformContinuous (fun (f : (∀ i, α i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
uniformContinuous_pi.mpr fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| uniformContinuous_proj α i
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp {α : Type*} [UniformSpace α] {g : α → β}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (g ∘ · : (ι → α) → (ι → β)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp' _ fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_precomp' (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (fun g i' ↦ g (φ i')) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun i' ↦ α (φ i'))) =
⨅ i', UniformSpace.comap (eval (φ i')) (U (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, UniformSpace.comap_iInf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap, comp_def]
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_precomp (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (· ∘ φ) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun _ ↦ β)) =
⨅ i', UniformSpace.comap (eval (φ i')) ‹UniformSpace β› :=
uniformSpace_comap_precomp' (fun _ ↦ β) φ
lemma Pi.uniformContinuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
UniformContinuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, α i) → (∀ i : S, α i)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' _ ((↑) : S → ι)
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_restrict (S : Set ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (S.restrict) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun i : S ↦ α i)) =
⨅ i ∈ S, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp
[← iInf_subtype'', ← uniformSpace_comap_precomp' _ ((↑) : S → ι), Set.restrict]
lemma cauchy_pi_iff [Nonempty ι] {l : Filter (∀ i, α i)} :
Cauchy l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (map (eval i) l) := by
simp_rw [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace, cauchy_comap_uniformSpace]
lemma cauchy_pi_iff' {l : Filter (∀ i, α i)} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (map (eval i) l) := by
simp_rw [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace', cauchy_comap_uniformSpace]
|
lemma Cauchy.pi [Nonempty ι] {l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)} (hl : ∀ i, Cauchy (l i)) :
Cauchy (Filter.pi l) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Pi.lean | 95 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
|
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 144 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
· cases h1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· exact (h2 (Monotone.map_bddBelow coe_mono h's)).elim
· rw [preimage_image_eq]
exact Option.some_injective _
theorem WithTop.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
change _ = ite _ _ _
rw [if_neg, preimage_image_eq, if_pos hs]
· exact Option.some_injective _
· rintro ⟨x, _, ⟨⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem WithBot.sSup_empty [SupSet α] : sSup (∅ : Set (WithBot α)) = ⊥ :=
WithTop.sInf_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sInf' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sSup' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
end
instance ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] :
LinearOrder α :=
{ ‹ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α› with
min_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂]
max_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of sInf and sSup in a complete lattice. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice α :=
{ ‹CompleteLattice α› with
le_csSup := by intros; apply le_sSup; assumption
csSup_le := by intros; apply sSup_le; assumption
csInf_le := by intros; apply sInf_le; assumption
le_csInf := by intros; apply le_sInf; assumption }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot {α : Type*}
[h : CompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α :=
{ CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice, h with
csSup_empty := sSup_empty
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderTop.bddAbove s)).elim
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderBot.bddBelow s)).elim }
namespace OrderDual
instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instInf α, OrderDual.instSup α, OrderDual.instLattice α with
le_csSup := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le (α := α)
csSup_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf (α := α)
le_csInf := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le (α := α)
csInf_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup (α := α) }
instance (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instConditionallyCompleteLattice α, OrderDual.instLinearOrder α with
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow (α := α)
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove (α := α) }
end OrderDual
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_csSup (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ sSup s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_le (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ sInf s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csSup_of_le (hs : BddAbove s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_csSup hs hb)
theorem csInf_le_of_le (hs : BddBelow s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (csInf_le hs hb) h
theorem csSup_le_csSup (ht : BddAbove t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
csSup_le hs fun _ ha => le_csSup ht (h ha)
theorem csInf_le_csInf (ht : BddBelow t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_csInf hs fun _ ha => csInf_le ht (h ha)
theorem le_csSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le hs hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem csInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_csInf hs hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => csInf_le h⟩
theorem isLUB_csSup (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ => le_csSup H, fun _ => csSup_le ne⟩
theorem isGLB_csInf (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => csInf_le H, fun _ => le_csInf ne⟩
theorem IsLUB.csSup_eq (H : IsLUB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sSup s = a :=
(isLUB_csSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_eq (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s = a :=
H.isLUB.csSup_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_mem (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s ∈ s :=
H.csSup_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem IsGLB.csInf_eq (H : IsGLB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = a :=
(isGLB_csInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
theorem IsLeast.csInf_eq (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s = a :=
H.isGLB.csInf_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsLeast.csInf_mem (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s ∈ s :=
H.csInf_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem subset_Icc_csInf_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) : s ⊆ Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
fun _ hx => ⟨csInf_le hb hx, le_csSup ha hx⟩
theorem csSup_le_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup hs hb)
theorem le_csInf_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_csInf hs hb)
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sSup (lowerBounds s) = sInf s :=
(isLUB_csSup h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isGLB_csInf hs h).isLUB
theorem csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sInf (upperBounds s) = sSup s :=
(isGLB_csInf h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isLUB_csSup hs h).isGLB
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddBelow (range f)) :
sSup (lowerBounds (range f)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem csInf_upperBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
sInf (upperBounds (range f)) = ⨆ i, f i :=
csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) (hs : BddBelow s) : x ∉ s :=
fun hx => lt_irrefl _ (h.trans_le (csInf_le hs hx))
theorem not_mem_of_csSup_lt {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : sSup s < x) (hs : BddAbove s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (hs : s.Nonempty) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(H' : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(eq_of_le_of_not_lt (csSup_le hs H)) fun hb =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := H' _ hb
lt_irrefl _ <| ha'.trans_le <| le_csSup ⟨b, H⟩ ha
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
s.Nonempty → (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- `b < sSup s` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, when `s` is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem lt_csSup_of_lt (hs : BddAbove s) (ha : a ∈ s) (h : b < a) : b < sSup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_csSup hs ha)
/-- `sInf s < b` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, when `s` is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem csInf_lt_of_lt : BddBelow s → a ∈ s → a < b → sInf s < b :=
lt_csSup_of_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
theorem exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.Nonempty) (tne : t.Nonempty)
(hst : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : (upperBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t).Nonempty :=
⟨sInf t, fun x hx => le_csInf tne <| hst x hx, fun _ hy => csInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/-- The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_singleton (a : α) : sSup {a} = a :=
isGreatest_singleton.csSup_eq
/-- The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_singleton (a : α) : sInf {a} = a :=
isLeast_singleton.csInf_eq
theorem csSup_pair (a b : α) : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair _ _ a b).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
theorem csInf_pair (a b : α) : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair _ _ a b).csInf_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
/-- If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum. -/
theorem csInf_le_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_csInf ne hb) (isLUB_csSup ne ha) ne
/-- The `sSup` of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the
assumptions that all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_union (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddAbove t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).union (isLUB_csSup tne ht)).csSup_eq sne.inl
/-- The `sInf` of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem csInf_union (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddBelow t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
csSup_union (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne ht tne
/-- The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_inter_le (hs : BddAbove s) (ht : BddAbove t) (hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
(csSup_le hst) fun _ hx => le_inf (le_csSup hs hx.1) (le_csSup ht hx.2)
/-- The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem le_csInf_inter :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
csSup_inter_le (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- The supremum of `insert a s` is the maximum of `a` and the supremum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded above. -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_insert (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).insert a).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of `insert a s` is the minimum of `a` and the infimum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded below. -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_insert (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
csSup_insert (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sInf (Icc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ici : sInf (Ici a) = a :=
isLeast_Ici.csInf_eq
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ico (h : a < b) : sInf (Ico a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioc [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sInf (Ioi a) = a :=
csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt nonempty_Ioi (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioo h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sSup (Icc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ico [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ico a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ico h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iic : sSup (Iic a) = a :=
isGreatest_Iic.csSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iio [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sSup (Iio a) = a :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt nonempty_Iio (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioo h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that
1) `b` is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound `b'` satisfies `b ≤ b'`. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_is_forall_le_of_forall_le_imp_ge (hs : s.Nonempty) (h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h_b_le_ub : ∀ ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → b ≤ ub) : sSup s = b :=
(csSup_le hs h_is_ub).antisymm ((h_b_le_ub _) fun _ => le_csSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
lemma sup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] (h : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_csSup (OrderTop.bddAbove s) h
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] (h : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
instance Pi.conditionallyCompleteLattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, ConditionallyCompleteLattice (α i)] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (∀ i, α i) :=
{ Pi.instLattice, Pi.supSet, Pi.infSet with
le_csSup := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
le_csSup ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
csSup_le := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(csSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i
csInf_le := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
csInf_le ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
le_csInf := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(le_csInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i }
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- When `b < sSup s`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : b < sSup s) : ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := by
contrapose! hb
exact csSup_le hs hb
/-- When `sInf s < b`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_csInf_lt (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : sInf s < b) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) hs hb
theorem lt_csSup_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_csSup hs hb
theorem csInf_lt_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_csInf hs hb
@[simp] lemma csSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs
@[simp] lemma ciSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup ∅ :=
csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
lemma csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup univ := by
rw [csSup_of_not_bddAbove hs, csSup_of_not_bddAbove (s := univ)]
contrapose! hs
exact hs.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma ciSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove hf
@[simp] lemma csInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs
@[simp] lemma ciInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf ∅ :=
csInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
lemma csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
lemma ciInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf univ :=
csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same supremum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup s = sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|s_ne
· have : t = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun y yt ↦ by simpa using ht y yt)
rw [this]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with rfl|t_ne
· have : s = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x xs ↦ by simpa using hs x xs)
rw [this]
by_cases B : BddAbove s ∨ BddAbove t
· have Bs : BddAbove s := by
rcases B with hB|⟨b, hb⟩
· exact hB
· refine ⟨b, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (hb hy)
have Bt : BddAbove t := by
rcases B with ⟨b, hb⟩|hB
· refine ⟨b, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, hx, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (hb hx)
· exact hB
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le s_ne (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (le_csSup Bt yt)
· apply csSup_le t_ne (fun y hy ↦ ?_)
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, xs, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (le_csSup Bs xs)
· simp [csSup_of_not_bddAbove, (not_or.1 B).1, (not_or.1 B).2]
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same infimum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csInf_eq_csInf_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf s = sInf t :=
csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ht
lemma sSup_iUnion_Iic (f : ι → α) : sSup (⋃ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = ⨆ i, f i := by
apply csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le
· rintro x ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, hi⟩
· rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_iUnion_of_mem i le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
lemma sInf_iUnion_Ici (f : ι → α) : sInf (⋃ (i : ι), Ici (f i)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
sSup_iUnion_Iic (α := αᵒᵈ) f
theorem csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) hs
theorem csSup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
open Function
variable [WellFoundedLT α]
theorem sInf_eq_argmin_on (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = argminOn id s hs :=
IsLeast.csInf_eq ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun _ ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem isLeast_csInf (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLeast s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_argmin_on hs]
exact ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun a ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff' (hs : s.Nonempty) : b ≤ sInf s ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
le_isGLB_iff (isLeast_csInf hs).isGLB
theorem csInf_mem (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isLeast_csInf hs).1
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
theorem Monotone.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Lemmas about a conditionally complete linear order with bottom element
In this case we have `Sup ∅ = ⊥`, so we can drop some `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions.
-/
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
@[simp]
theorem csInf_univ [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [OrderBot α] : sInf (univ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.csInf_eq
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : (sSup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.csSup_empty
theorem isLUB_csSup' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [csSup_empty, isLUB_empty]
· exact isLUB_csSup hne hs
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `csSup_le_iff`. -/
theorem csSup_le_iff' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) {a : α} : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup' hs)
theorem csSup_le' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ upperBounds s) : sSup s ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' ⟨a, h⟩).2 h
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `lt_csSup_iff`. -/
theorem lt_csSup_iff' (hb : BddAbove s) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simpa only [not_le, not_forall₂, exists_prop] using (csSup_le_iff' hb).not
theorem le_csSup_iff' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : BddAbove s) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le' hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff'' {s : Set α} {a : α} (ne : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b : α, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
le_csInf_iff (OrderBot.bddBelow _) ne
theorem csInf_le' (h : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a := csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) h
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a < sSup s) : ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
contrapose! h
exact csSup_le' h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf' {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf h (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem csInf_le_csInf' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : t.Nonempty) (h₂ : t ⊆ s) : sInf s ≤ sInf t :=
csInf_le_csInf (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le_csSup' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove t) (h₂ : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl | h
· rw [csSup_empty]
exact bot_le
· exact csSup_le_csSup h₁ h h₂
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
namespace WithTop
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α]
/-- The `sSup` of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isLUB_sSup' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· contradiction
apply coe_le_coe.2
exact le_csSup h₂ ha
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact False.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h₁))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exact absurd hb h₁
· exact ⟨b, hb⟩
· intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_rfl
· exfalso
apply h₂
use b
intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs
· simp [sSup]
· exact isLUB_sSup' hs
/-- The `sInf` of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isGLB_sInf' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro a ha
exact top_le_iff.2 (Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csInf_le ?_ ha)
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exfalso
apply h
intro c hc
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← top_le_iff]
exact hb hc
use b
intro c hc
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb hc)
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exfalso
apply h
intro b hb
exact Set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb))
· refine coe_le_coe.2 (le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· classical
contrapose! h
rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact mem_singleton ⊤
· exact (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim
· intro b hb
rw [← coe_le_coe]
exact ha hb
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
by_cases hs : BddBelow s
· exact isGLB_sInf' hs
· exfalso
apply hs
use ⊥
intro _ _
exact bot_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop α) where
__ := linearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra
le_sSup s := (isLUB_sSup s).1
sSup_le s := (isLUB_sSup s).2
le_sInf s := (isGLB_sInf s).2
sInf_le s := (isGLB_sInf s).1
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sSup'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set α} (hb : BddAbove s) : ↑(sSup s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sSup' hb, sSup_image]
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sInf'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sInf' hs h's, sInf_image]
end WithTop
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : Monotone f)
include h_mono
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`sSup` and `sInf`. -/
theorem le_csSup_image {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddAbove s) :
f c ≤ sSup (f '' s) :=
le_csSup (map_bddAbove h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
theorem csSup_image_le {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ upperBounds s) :
sSup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
csSup_le (Nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upperBounds_image hB)
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem csInf_image_le {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddBelow s) :
sInf (f '' s) ≤ f c := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact le_csSup_image (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hcs h_bdd
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem le_csInf_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ lowerBounds s) :
f B ≤ sInf (f '' s) := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact csSup_image_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hs hB
end Monotone
lemma MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddBelow (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf (f '' s) = sInf (f '' t) := by
obtain rfl | hs := Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· obtain rfl : t = ∅ := by simpa [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] using h
rfl
apply le_antisymm _ (csInf_le_csInf ht (hs.image _) (image_subset _ hst))
refine le_csInf ((hs.mono hst).image f) ?_
simp only [mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro a ha
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hxa⟩ := h a ha
exact csInf_le_of_le (ht.mono (image_subset _ hst)) ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩ (hf (hst hxs) ha hxa)
lemma MonotoneOn.csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddAbove (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup (f '' s) = sSup (f '' t) :=
MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) ht hf.dual hst h
/-!
### Supremum/infimum of `Set.image2`
A collection of lemmas showing what happens to the suprema/infima of `s` and `t` when mapped under
a binary function whose partial evaluations are lower/upper adjoints of Galois connections.
-/
section
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
variable {l u : α → β → γ} {l₁ u₁ : β → γ → α} {l₂ u₂ : α → γ → β}
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s)
(ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddAbove t) : sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sSup t) := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [csSup_le_iff (hs₁.image2 (fun _ => (h₁ _).monotone_l) (fun _ => (h₂ _).monotone_l) ht₁)
(hs₀.image2 ht₀),
forall_mem_image2, forall₂_swap, (h₂ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff ht₁ ht₀]
simp_rw [← (h₂ _).le_iff_le, (h₁ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff hs₁ hs₀]
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (u₁ := l₁) (u₂ := l₂)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) fun _ => (h₂ _).dual
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end
section WithTopBot
/-!
### Complete lattice structure on `WithTop (WithBot α)`
If `α` is a `ConditionallyCompleteLattice`, then we show that `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
also inherit the structure of conditionally complete lattices. Furthermore, we show
that `WithTop (WithBot α)` and `WithBot (WithTop α)` naturally inherit the structure of a
complete lattice. Note that for `α` a conditionally complete lattice, `sSup` and `sInf` both return
junk values for sets which are empty or unbounded. The extension of `sSup` to `WithTop α` fixes
the unboundedness problem and the extension to `WithBot α` fixes the problem with
the empty set.
This result can be used to show that the extended reals `[-∞, ∞]` are a complete linear order.
-/
/-- Adding a top element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithTop α) :=
{ lattice, instSupSet, instInfSet with
le_csSup := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
csSup_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' hS).2 haS
csInf_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' hS).1 haS
le_csInf := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
/-- Adding a bottom element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithBot.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.lattice with
le_csSup := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csInf_le
csSup_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csInf
csInf_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csSup
le_csInf := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csSup_le }
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, boundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
sSup_le := fun S a ha => by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· show ite _ _ _ ≤ a
simp [h]
· exact (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' h).2 ha
sInf_le := fun S a haS =>
show ite _ _ _ ≤ a by
simp only [OrderBot.bddBelow, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h₁
· cases a
· exact le_rfl
cases h₁ haS
· cases a
· exact le_top
· apply WithTop.coe_le_coe.2
refine csInf_le ?_ haS
use ⊥
intro b _
exact bot_le
le_sInf := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
-- FIXME: Spread notation doesn't work
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, instBoundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf_le
sSup_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sInf
sInf_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sSup
le_sInf := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup_le }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end WithTopBot
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 1,247 | 1,249 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.SmoothNumbers
/-!
# Euler Products
The main result in this file is `EulerProduct.eulerProduct_hasProd`, which says that
if `f : ℕ → R` is norm-summable, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring and `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments with `f 0 = 0`, then
`∏' p : Primes, ∑' e : ℕ, f (p^e)` converges to `∑' n, f n`.
`ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_hasProd` is a version
for multiplicative arithmetic functions in the sense of
`ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative`.
There is also a version `EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_hasProd`,
which states that `∏' p : Primes, (1 - f p)⁻¹` converges to `∑' n, f n`
when `f` is completely multiplicative with values in a complete normed field `F`
(implemented as `f : ℕ →*₀ F`).
There are variants stating the equality of the infinite product and the infinite sum
(`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_tprod`, `ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_tprod`,
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_tprod`) and also variants stating
the convergence of the sequence of partial products over primes `< n`
(`EulerProduct.eulerProduct`, `ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct`,
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative`.)
An intermediate step is `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum`
(and its variant `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric`),
which relates the finite product over primes `p ∈ s` to the sum of `f n` over `s`-factored `n`,
for `s : Finset ℕ`.
## Tags
Euler product, multiplicative function
-/
/-- If `f` is multiplicative and summable, then its values at natural numbers `> 1`
have norm strictly less than `1`. -/
lemma Summable.norm_lt_one {F : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing F] [CompleteSpace F] {f : ℕ →* F}
(hsum : Summable f) {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖f p‖ < 1 := by
refine summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one.mp ?_
simp_rw [← map_pow]
exact hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp
open scoped Topology
open Nat Finset
section General
/-!
### General Euler Products
In this section we consider multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions `f : ℕ → R`,
where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring. The main result is `EulerProduct.eulerProduct`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [NormedCommRing R] {f : ℕ → R}
-- local instance to speed up typeclass search
@[local instance] private lemma instT0Space : T0Space R := MetricSpace.instT0Space
variable [CompleteSpace R]
namespace EulerProduct
variable (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) (hmul : ∀ {m n}, Nat.Coprime m n → f (m * n) = f m * f n)
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- We relate a finite product over primes in `s` to an infinite sum over `s`-factored numbers. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum
(hsum : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖)) (s : Finset ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ f m)
(∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n)) := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
rw [factoredNumbers_empty]
simp only [not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, filter_true_of_mem, prod_empty]
exact ⟨(Set.finite_singleton 1).summable (‖f ·‖), hf₁ ▸ hasSum_singleton 1 f⟩
| insert p s hp ih =>
rw [filter_insert]
split_ifs with hpp
· constructor
· simp only [← (equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hpp hp).summable_iff, Function.comp_def,
equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply', factoredNumbers.map_prime_pow_mul hmul hpp hp]
refine Summable.of_nonneg_of_le (fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun _ ↦ norm_mul_le ..) ?_
apply Summable.mul_of_nonneg (hsum hpp) ih.1 <;> exact fun n ↦ norm_nonneg _
· have hp' : p ∉ {p ∈ s | p.Prime} := mt (mem_of_mem_filter p) hp
rw [prod_insert hp', ← (equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hpp hp).hasSum_iff, Function.comp_def]
conv =>
enter [1, x]
rw [equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply', factoredNumbers.map_prime_pow_mul hmul hpp hp]
have : T3Space R := instT3Space -- speeds up the following
apply (hsum hpp).of_norm.hasSum.mul ih.2
-- `exact summable_mul_of_summable_norm (hsum hpp) ih.1` gives a time-out
apply summable_mul_of_summable_norm (hsum hpp) ih.1
· rwa [factoredNumbers_insert s hpp]
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- A version of `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum`
in terms of the value of the series. -/
lemma prod_filter_prime_tsum_eq_tsum_factoredNumbers (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (s : Finset ℕ) :
∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∑' m : factoredNumbers s, f m :=
(summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum hf₁ hmul
(fun hp ↦ hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt) _).2.tsum_eq.symm
/-- The following statement says that summing over `s`-factored numbers such that
`s` contains `primesBelow N` for large enough `N` gets us arbitrarily close to the sum
over all natural numbers (assuming `f` is summable and `f 0 = 0`; the latter since
`0` is not `s`-factored). -/
lemma norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt (hsum : Summable f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) {ε : ℝ}
(εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ N : ℕ, ∀ s : Finset ℕ, primesBelow N ≤ s →
‖(∑' m : ℕ, f m) - ∑' m : factoredNumbers s, f m‖ < ε := by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ :=
summable_iff_nat_tsum_vanishing.mp hsum (Metric.ball 0 ε) <| Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 εpos
simp_rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at hN
refine ⟨N, fun s hs ↦ ?_⟩
have := hN _ <| factoredNumbers_compl hs
rwa [← hsum.tsum_subtype_add_tsum_subtype_compl (factoredNumbers s),
add_sub_cancel_left, tsum_eq_tsum_diff_singleton (factoredNumbers s)ᶜ hf₀]
-- Versions of the three lemmas above for `smoothNumbers N`
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- We relate a finite product over primes to an infinite sum over smooth numbers. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum
(hsum : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖)) (N : ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : N.smoothNumbers ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : N.smoothNumbers ↦ f m) (∏ p ∈ N.primesBelow, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n)) := by
rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, primesBelow]
exact summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum hf₁ hmul hsum _
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- A version of `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum`
in terms of the value of the series. -/
lemma prod_primesBelow_tsum_eq_tsum_smoothNumbers (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (N : ℕ) :
∏ p ∈ N.primesBelow, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∑' m : N.smoothNumbers, f m :=
(summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum hf₁ hmul
(fun hp ↦ hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt) _).2.tsum_eq.symm
/-- The following statement says that summing over `N`-smooth numbers
for large enough `N` gets us arbitrarily close to the sum over all natural numbers
(assuming `f` is norm-summable and `f 0 = 0`; the latter since `0` is not smooth). -/
lemma norm_tsum_smoothNumbers_sub_tsum_lt (hsum : Summable f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
{ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ N₀ : ℕ, ∀ N ≥ N₀, ‖(∑' m : ℕ, f m) - ∑' m : N.smoothNumbers, f m‖ < ε := by
conv => enter [1, N₀, N]; rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers]
obtain ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩ := norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt hsum hf₀ εpos
refine ⟨N₀, fun N hN ↦ hN₀ (range N) fun p hp ↦ ?_⟩
exact mem_range.mpr <| (lt_of_mem_primesBelow hp).trans_le hN
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. This version is stated using `HasProd`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_hasProd (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
HasProd (fun p : Primes ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) := by
let F : ℕ → R := fun n ↦ ∑' e, f (n ^ e)
change HasProd (F ∘ Subtype.val) _
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator,
show Set.mulIndicator (fun p : ℕ ↦ Irreducible p) = {p | Nat.Prime p}.mulIndicator from rfl,
HasProd, Metric.tendsto_atTop]
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩ := norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt hsum.of_norm hf₀ hε
refine ⟨range N₀, fun s hs ↦ ?_⟩
have : ∏ p ∈ s, {p | Nat.Prime p}.mulIndicator F p = ∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, F p :=
prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter s (fun _ ↦ F) _ id
rw [this, dist_eq_norm, prod_filter_prime_tsum_eq_tsum_factoredNumbers hf₁ hmul hsum,
norm_sub_rev]
exact hN₀ s fun p hp ↦ hs <| mem_range.mpr <| lt_of_mem_primesBelow hp
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` i
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : ℕ, if p.Prime then ∑' e, f (p ^ e) else 1 = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated using `HasProd` and `Set.mulIndicator`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_hasProd_mulIndicator (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
HasProd (Set.mulIndicator {p | Nat.Prime p} fun p ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) := by
rw [← hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator]
exact eulerProduct_hasProd hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀
open Filter in
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : {p : ℕ | p.Prime}, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This is a version using convergence of finite partial products. -/
theorem eulerProduct (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
have := (eulerProduct_hasProd_mulIndicator hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀).tendsto_prod_nat
let F : ℕ → R := fun p ↦ ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e)
have H (n : ℕ) : ∏ i ∈ range n, Set.mulIndicator {p | Nat.Prime p} F i =
∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e) :=
prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (range n) (fun _ ↦ F) (fun _ ↦ {p | Nat.Prime p}) id
simpa only [F, H]
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : {p : ℕ | p.Prime}, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_tprod (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
∏' p : Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n :=
(eulerProduct_hasProd hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀).tprod_eq
end EulerProduct
/-!
### Versions for arithmetic functions
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open EulerProduct
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated in terms of `HasProd`. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_hasProd {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
HasProd (fun p : Primes ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) :=
eulerProduct_hasProd hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
open Filter in
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated in the form of convergence of finite partial products. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) :=
eulerProduct hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_tprod {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
∏' p : Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n :=
eulerProduct_tprod hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
end ArithmeticFunction
end General
section CompletelyMultiplicative
/-!
### Euler Products for completely multiplicative functions
We now assume that `f` is completely multiplicative and has values in a complete normed field `F`.
Then we can use the formula for geometric series to simplify the statement. This leads to
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_hasProd` and variants.
-/
variable {F : Type*} [NormedField F] [CompleteSpace F]
namespace EulerProduct
-- a helper lemma that is useful below
lemma one_sub_inv_eq_geometric_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ →*₀ F} {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime)
(hsum : Summable fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) :
(1 - f p)⁻¹ = ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e) := by
simp only [map_pow]
refine (tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one <| summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one.mp ?_).symm
refine Summable.of_norm ?_
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_pow]
using hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt
/-- Given a (completely) multiplicative function `f : ℕ → F`, where `F` is a normed field,
such that `‖f p‖ < 1` for all primes `p`, we can express the sum of `f n` over all `s`-factored
positive integers `n` as a product of `(1 - f p)⁻¹` over the primes `p ∈ s`. At the same time,
we show that the sum involved converges absolutely. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric {f : ℕ →* F}
(h : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → ‖f p‖ < 1) (s : Finset ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ f m) (∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, (1 - f p)⁻¹) := by
| have hmul {m n} (_ : Nat.Coprime m n) := f.map_mul m n
have H₁ :
∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, (1 - f p)⁻¹ := by
refine prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ ?_
simp only [map_pow]
exact tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one <| h (mem_filter.mp hp).2
have H₂ : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable fun n ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖ := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/EulerProduct/Basic.lean | 298 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
/-!
# Characteristic polynomial
We define the characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`, where `M` is a finite and
free `R`-module. The proof that `f.charpoly` is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix of `f`
in any basis is in `LinearAlgebra/Charpoly/ToMatrix`.
## Main definition
* `LinearMap.charpoly f` : the characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`.
-/
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M)
open Matrix Polynomial
noncomputable section
open Module.Free Polynomial Matrix
namespace LinearMap
section Basic
/-- The characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def charpoly : R[X] :=
(toMatrix (chooseBasis R M) (chooseBasis R M) f).charpoly
theorem charpoly_def : f.charpoly = (toMatrix (chooseBasis R M) (chooseBasis R M) f).charpoly :=
rfl
end Basic
section Coeff
theorem charpoly_monic : f.charpoly.Monic :=
Matrix.charpoly_monic _
open Module in
lemma charpoly_natDegree [Nontrivial R] [StrongRankCondition R] :
natDegree (charpoly f) = finrank R M := by
rw [charpoly, Matrix.charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
end Coeff
section CayleyHamilton
/-- The **Cayley-Hamilton Theorem**, that the characteristic polynomial of a linear map, applied
to the linear map itself, is zero.
See `Matrix.aeval_self_charpoly` for the equivalent statement about matrices. -/
theorem aeval_self_charpoly : aeval f f.charpoly = 0 := by
apply (LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff (algEquivMatrix (chooseBasis R M)).toLinearEquiv).1
rw [AlgEquiv.toLinearEquiv_apply, ← AlgEquiv.coe_algHom, ← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply _ _ _,
charpoly_def]
exact Matrix.aeval_self_charpoly _
theorem isIntegral : IsIntegral R f :=
⟨f.charpoly, ⟨charpoly_monic f, aeval_self_charpoly f⟩⟩
theorem minpoly_dvd_charpoly {K : Type u} {M : Type v} [Field K] [AddCommGroup M] [Module K M]
[FiniteDimensional K M] (f : M →ₗ[K] M) : minpoly K f ∣ f.charpoly :=
minpoly.dvd _ _ (aeval_self_charpoly f)
/-- Any endomorphism polynomial `p` is equivalent under evaluation to `p %ₘ f.charpoly`; that is,
`p` is equivalent to a polynomial with degree less than the dimension of the module. -/
theorem aeval_eq_aeval_mod_charpoly (p : R[X]) : aeval f p = aeval f (p %ₘ f.charpoly) :=
(aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root f.charpoly_monic f.aeval_self_charpoly).symm
/-- Any endomorphism power can be computed as the sum of endomorphism powers less than the
dimension of the module. -/
theorem pow_eq_aeval_mod_charpoly (k : ℕ) : f ^ k = aeval f (X ^ k %ₘ f.charpoly) := by
rw [← aeval_eq_aeval_mod_charpoly, map_pow, aeval_X]
variable {f}
theorem minpoly_coeff_zero_of_injective [Nontrivial R] (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(minpoly R f).coeff 0 ≠ 0 := by
intro h
| obtain ⟨P, hP⟩ := X_dvd_iff.2 h
have hdegP : P.degree < (minpoly R f).degree := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Charpoly/Basic.lean | 95 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,572 | 2,574 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
| apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 150 | 185 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.