Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.BernoulliPolynomials
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
/-!
# Critical values of the Riemann zeta function
In this file we prove formulae for the critical values of `ζ(s)`, and more generally of Hurwitz
zeta functions, in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
## Main results:
* `hasSum_zeta_nat`: the final formula for zeta values,
$$\zeta(2k) = \frac{(-1)^{(k + 1)} 2 ^ {2k - 1} \pi^{2k} B_{2 k}}{(2 k)!}.$$
* `hasSum_zeta_two` and `hasSum_zeta_four`: special cases given explicitly.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), cos (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 2` even.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_sin`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), sin (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 3` odd.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat Real Interval
open Complex MeasureTheory Set intervalIntegral
local notation "𝕌" => UnitAddCircle
section BernoulliFunProps
/-! Simple properties of the Bernoulli polynomial, as a function `ℝ → ℝ`. -/
/-- The function `x ↦ Bₖ(x) : ℝ → ℝ`. -/
def bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli k)).eval x
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_zero (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 0 = bernoulli k := by
rw [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_zero_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 1) :
bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_zero, bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one,
bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one hk, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_one (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 + ite (k = 1) 1 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun, bernoulliFun_eval_zero, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, bernoulli_one, bernoulli'_one, eq_ratCast]
push_cast; ring
· rw [bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one h, add_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (bernoulliFun k) (k * bernoulliFun (k - 1) x) x := by
convert ((Polynomial.bernoulli k).map <| algebraMap ℚ ℝ).hasDerivAt x using 1
simp only [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.derivative_map, Polynomial.derivative_bernoulli k,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.eval_mul, Polynomial.eval_natCast]
theorem antideriv_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => bernoulliFun (k + 1) x / (k + 1)) (bernoulliFun k x) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k + 1) x).div_const _ using 1
field_simp [Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero k]
theorem integral_bernoulliFun_eq_zero {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, bernoulliFun k x = 0 := by
rw [integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x _ => antideriv_bernoulliFun k x)
((Polynomial.continuous _).intervalIntegrable _ _)]
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· exfalso; exact hk (Nat.succ_inj.mp h)
· simp
|
end BernoulliFunProps
section BernoulliFourierCoeffs
/-! Compute the Fourier coefficients of the Bernoulli functions via integration by parts. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ZetaValues.lean | 80 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FintypeCat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.SingleObj
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
/-!
# Matrices over a category.
When `C` is a preadditive category, `Mat_ C` is the preadditive category
whose objects are finite tuples of objects in `C`, and
whose morphisms are matrices of morphisms from `C`.
There is a functor `Mat_.embedding : C ⥤ Mat_ C` sending morphisms to one-by-one matrices.
`Mat_ C` has finite biproducts.
## The additive envelope
We show that this construction is the "additive envelope" of `C`,
in the sense that any additive functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a category `D` with biproducts
lifts to a functor `Mat_.lift F : Mat_ C ⥤ D`,
Moreover, this functor is unique (up to natural isomorphisms) amongst functors `L : Mat_ C ⥤ D`
such that `embedding C ⋙ L ≅ F`.
(As we don't have 2-category theory, we can't explicitly state that `Mat_ C` is
the initial object in the 2-category of categories under `C` which have biproducts.)
As a consequence, when `C` already has finite biproducts we have `Mat_ C ≌ C`.
## Future work
We should provide a more convenient `Mat R`, when `R` is a ring,
as a category with objects `n : FinType`,
and whose morphisms are matrices with components in `R`.
Ideally this would conveniently interact with both `Mat_` and `Matrix`.
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Preadditive
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [Preadditive C]
/-- An object in `Mat_ C` is a finite tuple of objects in `C`.
-/
structure Mat_ where
/-- The index type `ι` -/
ι : Type
[fintype : Fintype ι]
/-- The map from `ι` to objects in `C` -/
X : ι → C
attribute [instance] Mat_.fintype
namespace Mat_
variable {C}
/-- A morphism in `Mat_ C` is a dependently typed matrix of morphisms. -/
def Hom (M N : Mat_ C) : Type v₁ :=
DMatrix M.ι N.ι fun i j => M.X i ⟶ N.X j
namespace Hom
open scoped Classical in
/-- The identity matrix consists of identity morphisms on the diagonal, and zeros elsewhere. -/
def id (M : Mat_ C) : Hom M M := fun i j => if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0
/-- Composition of matrices using matrix multiplication. -/
def comp {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N K) : Hom M K := fun i k =>
∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k
end Hom
section
attribute [local simp] Hom.id Hom.comp
instance : Category.{v₁} (Mat_ C) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp f g := f.comp g
id_comp f := by
classical
simp +unfoldPartialApp [dite_comp]
comp_id f := by
classical
simp +unfoldPartialApp [comp_dite]
assoc f g h := by
apply DMatrix.ext
intros
simp_rw [Hom.comp, sum_comp, comp_sum, Category.assoc]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {M N : Mat_ C} (f g : M ⟶ N) (H : ∀ i j, f i j = g i j) : f = g :=
DMatrix.ext_iff.mp H
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_def (M : Mat_ C) :
(𝟙 M : Hom M M) = fun i j => if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0 :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_apply (M : Mat_ C) (i j : M.ι) :
(𝟙 M : Hom M M) i j = if h : i = j then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_self (M : Mat_ C) (i : M.ι) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M) i i = 𝟙 _ := by simp [id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_of_ne (M : Mat_ C) (i j : M.ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M) i j = 0 := by
simp [id_apply, h]
theorem comp_def {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
f ≫ g = fun i k => ∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {M N K : Mat_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) (i k) :
(f ≫ g) i k = ∑ j : N.ι, f i j ≫ g j k :=
rfl
instance (M N : Mat_ C) : Inhabited (M ⟶ N) :=
⟨fun i j => (0 : M.X i ⟶ N.X j)⟩
end
-- Porting note: to ease the construction of the preadditive structure, the `AddCommGroup`
-- was introduced separately and the lemma `add_apply` was moved upwards
instance (M N : Mat_ C) : AddCommGroup (M ⟶ N) := by
change AddCommGroup (DMatrix M.ι N.ι _)
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {M N : Mat_ C} (f g : M ⟶ N) (i j) : (f + g) i j = f i j + g i j :=
rfl
instance : Preadditive (Mat_ C) where
add_comp M N K f f' g := by ext; simp [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
comp_add M N K f g g' := by ext; simp [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open scoped Classical in
/-- We now prove that `Mat_ C` has finite biproducts.
Be warned, however, that `Mat_ C` is not necessarily Krull-Schmidt,
and so the internal indexing of a biproduct may have nothing to do with the external indexing,
even though the construction we give uses a sigma type.
See however `isoBiproductEmbedding`.
-/
instance hasFiniteBiproducts : HasFiniteBiproducts (Mat_ C) where
out n :=
{ has_biproduct := fun f =>
hasBiproduct_of_total
{ pt := ⟨Σ j, (f j).ι, fun p => (f p.1).X p.2⟩
π := fun j x y => by
refine if h : x.1 = j then ?_ else 0
refine if h' : @Eq.ndrec (Fin n) x.1 (fun j => (f j).ι) x.2 _ h = y then ?_ else 0
apply eqToHom
substs h h'
rfl
-- Notice we were careful not to use `subst` until we had a goal in `Prop`.
ι := fun j x y => by
refine if h : y.1 = j then ?_ else 0
refine if h' : @Eq.ndrec _ y.1 (fun j => (f j).ι) y.2 _ h = x then ?_ else 0
apply eqToHom
substs h h'
rfl
ι_π := fun j j' => by
ext x y
dsimp
simp_rw [dite_comp, comp_dite]
simp only [ite_self, dite_eq_ite, Limits.comp_zero, Limits.zero_comp,
eqToHom_trans, Finset.sum_congr]
erw [Finset.sum_sigma]
dsimp
simp only [if_true, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.mem_univ,
Finset.sum_const_zero, Finset.sum_congr, Finset.sum_dite_eq']
split_ifs with h h'
· substs h h'
simp only [CategoryTheory.eqToHom_refl, CategoryTheory.Mat_.id_apply_self]
· subst h
rw [eqToHom_refl, id_apply_of_ne _ _ _ h']
· rfl }
(by
dsimp
ext1 ⟨i, j⟩
rintro ⟨i', j'⟩
rw [Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_apply]
dsimp
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i]; rotate_left
· intro b _ hb
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro x _
rw [dif_neg hb.symm, zero_comp]
· intro hi
simp at hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single j]; rotate_left
· intro b _ hb
rw [dif_pos rfl, dif_neg, zero_comp]
simp only
tauto
· intro hj
simp at hj
simp only [eqToHom_refl, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, Category.id_comp, ne_eq,
Sigma.mk.inj_iff, not_and, id_def]
by_cases h : i' = i
· subst h
rw [dif_pos rfl]
simp only [heq_eq_eq, true_and]
by_cases h : j' = j
· subst h
simp
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (Ne.symm h)]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg]
tauto) }
end Mat_
namespace Functor
variable {C} {D : Type*} [Category.{v₁} D] [Preadditive D]
attribute [local simp] Mat_.id_apply eqToHom_map
/-- A functor induces a functor of matrix categories.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMat_ (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] : Mat_ C ⥤ Mat_ D where
obj M := ⟨M.ι, fun i => F.obj (M.X i)⟩
map f i j := F.map (f i j)
/-- The identity functor induces the identity functor on matrix categories.
-/
@[simps!]
def mapMatId : (𝟭 C).mapMat_ ≅ 𝟭 (Mat_ C) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun M => eqToIso (by cases M; rfl)) fun {M N} f => by
classical
ext
cases M; cases N
simp [comp_dite, dite_comp]
/-- Composite functors induce composite functors on matrix categories.
-/
@[simps!]
def mapMatComp {E : Type*} [Category.{v₁} E] [Preadditive E] (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F]
(G : D ⥤ E) [Functor.Additive G] : (F ⋙ G).mapMat_ ≅ F.mapMat_ ⋙ G.mapMat_ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun M => eqToIso (by cases M; rfl)) fun {M N} f => by
classical
ext
cases M; cases N
simp [comp_dite, dite_comp]
end Functor
namespace Mat_
/-- The embedding of `C` into `Mat_ C` as one-by-one matrices.
(We index the summands by `PUnit`.) -/
@[simps]
def embedding : C ⥤ Mat_ C where
obj X := ⟨PUnit, fun _ => X⟩
map f _ _ := f
map_id _ := by ext ⟨⟩; simp
map_comp _ _ := by ext ⟨⟩; simp
namespace Embedding
instance : (embedding C).Faithful where
map_injective h := congr_fun (congr_fun h PUnit.unit) PUnit.unit
instance : (embedding C).Full where map_surjective f := ⟨f PUnit.unit PUnit.unit, rfl⟩
instance : Functor.Additive (embedding C) where
end Embedding
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Mat_ C) :=
⟨(embedding C).obj default⟩
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Every object in `Mat_ C` is isomorphic to the biproduct of its summands.
-/
@[simps]
def isoBiproductEmbedding (M : Mat_ C) : M ≅ ⨁ fun i => (embedding C).obj (M.X i) where
hom := biproduct.lift fun i j _ => if h : j = i then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0
inv := biproduct.desc fun i _ k => if h : i = k then eqToHom (congr_arg M.X h) else 0
hom_inv_id := by
simp only [biproduct.lift_desc]
funext i j
dsimp [id_def]
rw [Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_eq_single i]; rotate_left
· intro b _ hb
dsimp
rw [Fintype.univ_ofSubsingleton, Finset.sum_singleton, dif_neg hb.symm, zero_comp]
· intro h
simp at h
simp
inv_hom_id := by
apply biproduct.hom_ext
intro i
apply biproduct.hom_ext'
intro j
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc,
biproduct.ι_π]
ext ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp only [embedding, comp_apply, comp_dite, dite_comp, comp_zero, zero_comp,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· rfl
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D] [Preadditive D]
-- Porting note: added because it was not found automatically
instance (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] (M : Mat_ C) :
HasBiproduct (fun i => F.obj ((embedding C).obj (M.X i))) :=
F.hasBiproduct_of_preserves _
-- Porting note: removed the @[simps] attribute as the automatically generated lemmas
-- are not very useful; two more useful lemmas have been added just after this
-- definition in order to ease the proof of `additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality`
/-- Every `M` is a direct sum of objects from `C`, and `F` preserves biproducts. -/
def additiveObjIsoBiproduct (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] (M : Mat_ C) :
F.obj M ≅ ⨁ fun i => F.obj ((embedding C).obj (M.X i)) :=
F.mapIso (isoBiproductEmbedding M) ≪≫ F.mapBiproduct _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma additiveObjIsoBiproduct_hom_π (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] (M : Mat_ C) (i : M.ι) :
(additiveObjIsoBiproduct F M).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ i =
F.map (M.isoBiproductEmbedding.hom ≫ biproduct.π _ i) := by
dsimp [additiveObjIsoBiproduct]
rw [biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc]
erw [biproduct.lift_π, ← F.map_comp]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_additiveObjIsoBiproduct_inv (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] (M : Mat_ C) (i : M.ι) :
biproduct.ι _ i ≫ (additiveObjIsoBiproduct F M).inv =
F.map (biproduct.ι _ i ≫ M.isoBiproductEmbedding.inv) := by
dsimp [additiveObjIsoBiproduct, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [biproduct.ι_desc, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, ← F.map_comp]
variable [HasFiniteBiproducts D]
@[reassoc]
theorem additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] {M N : Mat_ C}
(f : M ⟶ N) :
F.map f ≫ (additiveObjIsoBiproduct F N).hom =
(additiveObjIsoBiproduct F M).hom ≫
biproduct.matrix fun i j => F.map ((embedding C).map (f i j)) := by
classical
ext i : 1
simp only [Category.assoc, additiveObjIsoBiproduct_hom_π, isoBiproductEmbedding_hom,
embedding_obj_ι, embedding_obj_X, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.matrix_π,
← cancel_epi (additiveObjIsoBiproduct F M).inv, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
ext j : 1
simp only [ι_additiveObjIsoBiproduct_inv_assoc, isoBiproductEmbedding_inv,
biproduct.ι_desc, ← F.map_comp]
congr 1
funext ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp [comp_apply, dite_comp, comp_dite]
@[reassoc]
theorem additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality' (F : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] {M N : Mat_ C}
(f : M ⟶ N) :
(additiveObjIsoBiproduct F M).inv ≫ F.map f =
biproduct.matrix (fun i j => F.map ((embedding C).map (f i j)) :) ≫
(additiveObjIsoBiproduct F N).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality]
attribute [local simp] biproduct.lift_desc
/-- Any additive functor `C ⥤ D` to a category `D` with finite biproducts extends to
a functor `Mat_ C ⥤ D`. -/
@[simps]
def lift (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] : Mat_ C ⥤ D where
obj X := ⨁ fun i => F.obj (X.X i)
map f := biproduct.matrix fun i j => F.map (f i j)
map_id X := by
ext i j
by_cases h : j = i
· subst h; simp
· simp [h]
instance lift_additive (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] : Functor.Additive (lift F) where
/-- An additive functor `C ⥤ D` factors through its lift to `Mat_ C ⥤ D`. -/
@[simps!]
def embeddingLiftIso (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] : embedding C ⋙ lift F ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun X =>
{ hom := biproduct.desc fun _ => 𝟙 (F.obj X)
inv := biproduct.lift fun _ => 𝟙 (F.obj X) })
/-- `Mat_.lift F` is the unique additive functor `L : Mat_ C ⥤ D` such that `F ≅ embedding C ⋙ L`.
-/
def liftUnique (F : C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive F] (L : Mat_ C ⥤ D) [Functor.Additive L]
(α : embedding C ⋙ L ≅ F) : L ≅ lift F :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun M =>
additiveObjIsoBiproduct L M ≪≫
(biproduct.mapIso fun i => α.app (M.X i)) ≪≫
(biproduct.mapIso fun i => (embeddingLiftIso F).symm.app (M.X i)) ≪≫
(additiveObjIsoBiproduct (lift F) M).symm)
fun f => by
dsimp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom]
simp only [additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality_assoc]
simp only [biproduct.matrix_map_assoc, Category.assoc]
simp only [additiveObjIsoBiproduct_naturality']
simp only [biproduct.map_matrix_assoc, Category.assoc]
congr 3
ext j k
apply biproduct.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟩
dsimp
simpa using α.hom.naturality (f j k)
-- TODO is there some uniqueness statement for the natural isomorphism in `liftUnique`?
/-- Two additive functors `Mat_ C ⥤ D` are naturally isomorphic if
their precompositions with `embedding C` are naturally isomorphic as functors `C ⥤ D`. -/
def ext {F G : Mat_ C ⥤ D} [Functor.Additive F] [Functor.Additive G]
(α : embedding C ⋙ F ≅ embedding C ⋙ G) : F ≅ G :=
liftUnique (embedding C ⋙ G) _ α ≪≫ (liftUnique _ _ (Iso.refl _)).symm
/-- Natural isomorphism needed in the construction of `equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts`.
-/
def equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproductsAux [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
embedding C ⋙ 𝟭 (Mat_ C) ≅ embedding C ⋙ lift (𝟭 C) ⋙ embedding C :=
Functor.rightUnitor _ ≪≫
(Functor.leftUnitor _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (embeddingLiftIso _).symm _ ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _
/--
A preadditive category that already has finite biproducts is equivalent to its additive envelope.
Note that we only prove this for a large category;
otherwise there are universe issues that I haven't attempted to sort out.
-/
def equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts (C : Type (u₁ + 1)) [LargeCategory C] [Preadditive C]
[HasFiniteBiproducts C] : Mat_ C ≌ C :=
Equivalence.mk
(-- I suspect this is already an adjoint equivalence, but it seems painful to verify.
lift
(𝟭 C))
(embedding C) (ext equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproductsAux) (embeddingLiftIso (𝟭 C))
@[simp]
theorem equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts_functor {C : Type (u₁ + 1)} [LargeCategory C]
[Preadditive C] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
(equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts C).functor = lift (𝟭 C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts_inverse {C : Type (u₁ + 1)} [LargeCategory C]
[Preadditive C] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
(equivalenceSelfOfHasFiniteBiproducts C).inverse = embedding C :=
rfl
end Mat_
universe u
/-- A type synonym for `Fintype`, which we will equip with a category structure
where the morphisms are matrices with components in `R`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Mat (_ : Type u) :=
FintypeCat.{u}
instance (R : Type u) : Inhabited (Mat R) := by
dsimp [Mat]
infer_instance
instance (R : Type u) : CoeSort (Mat R) (Type u) :=
FintypeCat.instCoeSort
open Matrix
open scoped Classical in
instance (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : Category (Mat R) where
Hom X Y := Matrix X Y R
id X := (1 : Matrix X X R)
comp {X Y Z} f g := (show Matrix X Y R from f) * (show Matrix Y Z R from g)
assoc := by intros; simp [Matrix.mul_assoc]
namespace Mat
section
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {X Y : Mat R} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : ∀ i j, f i j = g i j) : f = g :=
Matrix.ext_iff.mp h
variable (R)
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_def (M : Mat R) : 𝟙 M = fun i j => if i = j then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem id_apply (M : Mat R) (i j : M) : (𝟙 M : Matrix M M R) i j = if i = j then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_self (M : Mat R) (i : M) : (𝟙 M : Matrix M M R) i i = 1 := by simp [id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_of_ne (M : Mat R) (i j : M) (h : i ≠ j) : (𝟙 M : Matrix M M R) i j = 0 := by
simp [id_apply, h]
theorem comp_def {M N K : Mat R} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
f ≫ g = fun i k => ∑ j : N, f i j * g j k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {M N K : Mat R} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) (i k) :
(f ≫ g) i k = ∑ j : N, f i j * g j k :=
rfl
instance (M N : Mat R) : Inhabited (M ⟶ N) :=
⟨fun (_ : M) (_ : N) => (0 : R)⟩
end
variable (R : Type) [Ring R]
open Opposite
/-- Auxiliary definition for `CategoryTheory.Mat.equivalenceSingleObj`. -/
@[simps]
def equivalenceSingleObjInverse : Mat_ (SingleObj Rᵐᵒᵖ) ⥤ Mat R where
obj X := FintypeCat.of X.ι
map f i j := MulOpposite.unop (f i j)
map_id X := by
ext
simp only [Mat_.id_def, id_def]
split_ifs <;> rfl
map_comp f g := by
-- Porting note: this proof was automatic in mathlib3
ext
simp only [Mat_.comp_apply, comp_apply]
apply Finset.unop_sum
instance : (equivalenceSingleObjInverse R).Faithful where
map_injective w := by
ext
apply_fun MulOpposite.unop using MulOpposite.unop_injective
exact congr_fun (congr_fun w _) _
instance : (equivalenceSingleObjInverse R).Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨fun i j => MulOpposite.op (f i j), rfl⟩
instance : (equivalenceSingleObjInverse R).EssSurj where
mem_essImage X :=
⟨{ ι := X
X := fun _ => PUnit.unit }, ⟨eqToIso (by cases X; congr)⟩⟩
instance : (equivalenceSingleObjInverse R).IsEquivalence where
/-- The categorical equivalence between the category of matrices over a ring,
| and the category of matrices over that ring considered as a single-object category. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Mat.lean | 589 | 589 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
/-!
# `init` and `tail`
Given a Witt vector `x`, we are sometimes interested
in its components before and after an index `n`.
This file defines those operations, proves that `init` is polynomial,
and shows how that polynomial interacts with `MvPolynomial.bind₁`.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.init n x`: the first `n` coefficients of `x`, as a Witt vector. All coefficients at
indices ≥ `n` are 0.
* `WittVector.tail n x`: the complementary part to `init`. All coefficients at indices < `n` are 0,
otherwise they are the same as in `x`.
* `WittVector.coeff_add_of_disjoint`: if `x` and `y` are Witt vectors such that for every `n`
the `n`-th coefficient of `x` or of `y` is `0`, then the coefficients of `x + y`
are just `x.coeff n + y.coeff n`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
-- type as `\bbW`
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
namespace WittVector
open MvPolynomial
noncomputable section
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- `WittVector.select P x`, for a predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` is the Witt vector
whose `n`-th coefficient is `x.coeff n` if `P n` is true, and `0` otherwise.
-/
def select (P : ℕ → Prop) (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => if P n then x.coeff n else 0
section Select
variable (P : ℕ → Prop)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The polynomial that witnesses that `WittVector.select` is a polynomial function.
`selectPoly n` is `X n` if `P n` holds, and `0` otherwise. -/
def selectPoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if P n then X n else 0
theorem coeff_select (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(select P x).coeff n = aeval x.coeff (selectPoly P n) := by
dsimp [select, selectPoly]
split_ifs with hi
· rw [aeval_X, mk]; simp only [hi, if_true]
· rw [map_zero, mk]; simp only [hi, if_false]
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`. Made the argument `P` implicit in doing so.
instance select_isPoly {P : ℕ → Prop} : IsPoly p fun _ _ x => select P x := by
use selectPoly P
rintro R _Rcr x
funext i
apply coeff_select
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem select_add_select_not : ∀ x : 𝕎 R, select P x + select (fun i => ¬P i) x = x := by
-- Porting note: TC search was insufficient to find this instance, even though all required
-- instances exist. See zulip: [https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/WittVector.20saga/near/370073526]
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ select P x + select (fun i ↦ ¬P i) x :=
IsPoly₂.diag (hf := IsPoly₂.comp)
ghost_calc x
intro n
simp only [RingHom.map_add]
suffices
(bind₁ (selectPoly P)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) +
(bind₁ (selectPoly fun i => ¬P i)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) =
wittPolynomial p ℤ n by
apply_fun aeval x.coeff at this
simpa only [map_add, aeval_bind₁, ← coeff_select]
simp only [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, selectPoly, map_sum, map_pow, map_mul,
bind₁_X_right, bind₁_C_right, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← mul_add]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
refine fun m _ => mul_eq_mul_left_iff.mpr (Or.inl ?_)
rw [ite_pow, zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero)]
by_cases Pm : P m
· rw [if_pos Pm, if_neg <| not_not_intro Pm, zero_pow Fin.pos'.ne', add_zero]
· rwa [if_neg Pm, if_pos, zero_add]
theorem coeff_add_of_disjoint (x y : 𝕎 R) (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = 0 ∨ y.coeff n = 0) :
(x + y).coeff n = x.coeff n + y.coeff n := by
let P : ℕ → Prop := fun n => y.coeff n = 0
haveI : DecidablePred P := Classical.decPred P
set z := mk p fun n => if P n then x.coeff n else y.coeff n
have hx : select P z = x := by
ext1 n; rw [select, coeff_mk, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hn
· rfl
· rw [(h n).resolve_right hn]
have hy : select (fun i => ¬P i) z = y := by
ext1 n; rw [select, coeff_mk, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hn
· exact hn.symm
· rfl
calc
(x + y).coeff n = z.coeff n := by rw [← hx, ← hy, select_add_select_not P z]
_ = x.coeff n + y.coeff n := by
simp only [z, mk.eq_1]
split_ifs with y0
· rw [y0, add_zero]
· rw [h n |>.resolve_right y0, zero_add]
end Select
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- `WittVector.init n x` is the Witt vector of which the first `n` coefficients are those from `x`
and all other coefficients are `0`.
See `WittVector.tail` for the complementary part.
-/
def init (n : ℕ) : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R :=
select fun i => i < n
/-- `WittVector.tail n x` is the Witt vector of which the first `n` coefficients are `0`
and all other coefficients are those from `x`.
See `WittVector.init` for the complementary part. -/
def tail (n : ℕ) : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R :=
select fun i => n ≤ i
@[simp]
theorem init_add_tail (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n x + tail n x = x := by
simp only [init, tail, ← not_lt, select_add_select_not]
end
/--
`init_ring` is an auxiliary tactic that discharges goals factoring `init` over ring operations.
-/
syntax (name := initRing) "init_ring" (" using " term)? : tactic
-- Porting note: this tactic requires that we turn hygiene off (note the free `n`).
-- TODO: make this tactic hygienic.
open Lean Elab Tactic in
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| init_ring $[ using $a:term]?) => withMainContext <| set_option hygiene false in do
evalTactic <|← `(tactic|(
rw [WittVector.ext_iff]
intro i
simp only [WittVector.init, WittVector.select, WittVector.coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi <;> try {rfl}
))
if let some e := a then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic|(
simp only [WittVector.add_coeff, WittVector.mul_coeff, WittVector.neg_coeff,
WittVector.sub_coeff, WittVector.nsmul_coeff, WittVector.zsmul_coeff, WittVector.pow_coeff]
apply MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_congr' (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
rintro ⟨b, k⟩ h -
replace h := $e:term p _ h
simp only [Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_product, true_and, Finset.mem_univ] at h
have hk : k < n := by omega
fin_cases b <;> simp only [Function.uncurry, Matrix.cons_val_zero, Matrix.head_cons,
WittVector.coeff_mk, Matrix.cons_val_one, WittVector.mk, Fin.mk_zero, Matrix.cons_val',
Matrix.empty_val', Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
hk, if_true]
))
-- Porting note: `by init_ring` should suffice; this patches over an issue with `split_ifs`.
-- See zulip: [https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.60split_ifs.60.20boxes.20itself.20into.20a.20corner]
@[simp]
theorem init_init (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (init n x) = init n x := by
rw [WittVector.ext_iff]
intro i
simp only [WittVector.init, WittVector.select, WittVector.coeff_mk]
by_cases hi : i < n <;> simp [hi]
section
| variable [Fact p.Prime]
theorem init_add (x y : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (x + y) = init n (init n x + init n y) := by
init_ring using wittAdd_vars
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/InitTail.lean | 194 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
@[gcongr, bound]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
@[bound]
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx).le).2 hx
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
@[bound]
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
@[bound]
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx.le, not_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-16")]
alias log_nonpos_iff' := log_nonpos_iff
@[bound]
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff hx).2 h'x
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
· rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
lemma one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 - x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
simpa [add_comm] using log_le_sub_one_of_pos (inv_pos.2 hx)
/-- See `Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma log_le_self (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := hx.eq_or_lt
· simp
· exact (log_le_sub_one_of_pos hx).trans (by linarith)
/-- See `Real.one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma neg_inv_le_log (hx : 0 ≤ x) : -x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
rw [neg_le, ← log_inv]; exact log_le_self <| inv_nonneg.2 hx
/-- Bound for `|log x * x|` in the interval `(0, 1]`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_lt (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) : |log x * x| < 1 := by
have : 0 < 1 / x := by simpa only [one_div, inv_pos] using h1
replace := log_le_sub_one_of_pos this
replace : log (1 / x) < 1 / x := by linarith
rw [log_div one_ne_zero h1.ne', log_one, zero_sub, lt_div_iff₀ h1] at this
have aux : 0 ≤ -log x * x := by
refine mul_nonneg ?_ h1.le
rw [← log_inv]
apply log_nonneg
rw [← le_inv_comm₀ h1 zero_lt_one, inv_one]
exact h2
rw [← abs_of_nonneg aux, neg_mul, abs_neg] at this
exact this
/-- The real logarithm function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_log_atTop : Tendsto log atTop atTop :=
tendsto_comp_exp_atTop.1 <| by simpa only [log_exp] using tendsto_id
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[>] 0) atBot := by
simpa [← tendsto_comp_exp_atBot] using tendsto_id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_right := tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[≠] 0) atBot := by
simpa [comp_def] using tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero.comp tendsto_abs_nhdsNE_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero := tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsLT_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[<] 0) atBot :=
tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _ h ↦ ne_of_lt h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_left := tendsto_log_nhdsLT_zero
theorem continuousOn_log : ContinuousOn log {0}ᶜ := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict,
restrict]
conv in log _ => rw [log_of_ne_zero (show (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 from x.2)]
| exact expOrderIso.symm.continuous.comp (continuous_subtype_val.norm.subtype_mk _)
/-- The real logarithm is continuous as a function from nonzero reals. -/
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 347 | 350 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,431 | 2,432 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
/-!
# Probability mass functions
This file is about probability mass functions or discrete probability measures:
a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` such that the values have (infinite) sum `1`.
Construction of monadic `pure` and `bind` is found in `ProbabilityMassFunction/Monad.lean`,
other constructions of `PMF`s are found in `ProbabilityMassFunction/Constructions.lean`.
Given `p : PMF α`, `PMF.toOuterMeasure` constructs an `OuterMeasure` on `α`,
by assigning each set the sum of the probabilities of each of its elements.
Under this outer measure, every set is Carathéodory-measurable,
so we can further extend this to a `Measure` on `α`, see `PMF.toMeasure`.
`PMF.toMeasure.isProbabilityMeasure` shows this associated measure is a probability measure.
Conversely, given a probability measure `μ` on a measurable space `α` with all singleton sets
measurable, `μ.toPMF` constructs a `PMF` on `α`, setting the probability mass of a point `x`
to be the measure of the singleton set `{x}`.
## Tags
probability mass function, discrete probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
variable {α : Type*}
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
/-- A probability mass function, or discrete probability measures is a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` such
that the values have (infinite) sum `1`. -/
def PMF.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : α → ℝ≥0∞ // HasSum f 1 }
namespace PMF
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PMF α) α ℝ≥0∞ where
coe p a := p.1 a
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq h
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {p q : PMF α} (h : ∀ x, p x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
theorem hasSum_coe_one (p : PMF α) : HasSum p 1 :=
p.2
@[simp]
theorem tsum_coe (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a = 1 :=
p.hasSum_coe_one.tsum_eq
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a ≠ ∞ :=
p.tsum_coe.symm ▸ ENNReal.one_ne_top
theorem tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top (p : PMF α) (s : Set α) : ∑' a, s.indicator p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum (fun _ => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl))
(lt_of_le_of_ne le_top p.tsum_coe_ne_top))
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_zero (p : PMF α) : ⇑p ≠ 0 := fun hp =>
zero_ne_one ((tsum_zero.symm.trans (tsum_congr fun x => symm (congr_fun hp x))).trans p.tsum_coe)
/-- The support of a `PMF` is the set where it is nonzero. -/
def support (p : PMF α) : Set α :=
Function.support p
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : a ∈ p.support ↔ p a ≠ 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty (p : PMF α) : p.support.Nonempty :=
Function.support_nonempty_iff.2 p.coe_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_countable (p : PMF α) : p.support.Countable :=
Summable.countable_support_ennreal (tsum_coe_ne_top p)
theorem apply_eq_zero_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 0 ↔ a ∉ p.support := by
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not]
theorem apply_pos_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : 0 < p a ↔ a ∈ p.support :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans (p.mem_support_iff a).symm
theorem apply_eq_one_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 1 ↔ p.support = {a} := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.Subset.antisymm (fun a' ha' => by_contra fun ha => ?_)
fun a' ha' => ha'.symm ▸ (p.mem_support_iff a).2 fun ha => zero_ne_one <| ha.symm.trans h,
fun h => _root_.trans (symm <| tsum_eq_single a
fun a' ha' => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a').2 (h.symm ▸ ha')) p.tsum_coe⟩
suffices 1 < ∑' a, p a from ne_of_lt this p.tsum_coe.symm
classical
have : 0 < ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := lt_of_le_of_ne' zero_le'
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_ne_zero_iff.2
⟨a', ite_ne_left_iff.2 ⟨ha, Ne.symm <| (p.mem_support_iff a').2 ha'⟩⟩)
calc
1 = 1 + 0 := (add_zero 1).symm
_ < p a + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) :=
(ENNReal.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ENNReal.one_ne_top (le_of_eq h.symm) this)
_ = ite (a = a) (p a) 0 + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by rw [eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
_ = (∑' b, ite (b = a) (p b) 0) + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by
congr
exact symm (tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => if_neg hb)
_ = ∑' b, (ite (b = a) (p b) 0 + ite (b = a) 0 (p b)) := ENNReal.tsum_add.symm
_ = ∑' b, p b := tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_add, add_zero, le_rfl]
theorem coe_le_one (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≤ 1 := by
classical
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) (hasSum_ite_eq a (p a)) (hasSum_coe_one p)
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h, zero_le', le_rfl]
theorem apply_ne_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (p.coe_le_one a) ENNReal.one_lt_top)
theorem apply_lt_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (p.apply_ne_top a)
section OuterMeasure
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure
/-- Construct an `OuterMeasure` from a `PMF`, by assigning measure to each set `s : Set α` equal
to the sum of `p x` for each `x ∈ α`. -/
def toOuterMeasure (p : PMF α) : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.sum fun x : α => p x • dirac x
variable (p : PMF α) (s : Set α)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator p x :=
tsum_congr fun x => smul_dirac_apply (p x) x s
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_caratheodory : p.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.2 <| le_trans (le_sInf fun x hx => ?_) (le_sum_caratheodory _)
have ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
exact
((le_of_eq (dirac_caratheodory y).symm).trans (le_smul_caratheodory _ _)).trans (le_of_eq hy)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_finset (s : Finset α) : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑ x ∈ s, p x := by
refine (toOuterMeasure_apply p s).trans ((tsum_eq_sum (s := s) ?_).trans ?_)
· exact fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_not_mem (Finset.mem_coe.not.2 hx) _
· exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hx) _
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton (a : α) : p.toOuterMeasure {a} = p a := by
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply {a}).trans ((tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => ?_).trans ?_)
· classical exact ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun hb' => False.elim <| hb hb'
· classical exact ite_eq_left_iff.2 fun ha' => False.elim <| ha' rfl
theorem toOuterMeasure_injective : (toOuterMeasure : PMF α → OuterMeasure α).Injective :=
fun p q h => PMF.ext fun x => (p.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x).symm.trans
((congr_fun (congr_arg _ h) _).trans <| q.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_inj {p q : PMF α} : p.toOuterMeasure = q.toOuterMeasure ↔ p = q :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.eq_iff
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 0 ↔ Disjoint p.support s := by
rw [toOuterMeasure_apply, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero]
exact funext_iff.symm.trans Set.indicator_eq_zero'
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_one_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 1 ↔ p.support ⊆ s := by
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply s).symm ▸ ⟨fun h a hap => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine by_contra fun hs => ne_of_lt ?_ (h.trans p.tsum_coe.symm)
have hs' : s.indicator p a = 0 := Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hs' => False.elim <| hs hs'
have hsa : s.indicator p a < p a := hs'.symm ▸ (p.apply_pos_iff a).2 hap
exact ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum (p.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top s)
(fun x => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl) hsa
· classical suffices ∀ (x) (_ : x ∉ s), p x = 0 from
_root_.trans (tsum_congr
fun a => (Set.indicator_apply s p a).trans
(ite_eq_left_iff.2 <| symm ∘ this a)) p.tsum_coe
exact fun a ha => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a).2 <| Set.not_mem_subset h ha
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_inter_support :
p.toOuterMeasure (s ∩ p.support) = p.toOuterMeasure s := by
simp only [toOuterMeasure_apply, PMF.support, Set.indicator_inter_support]
/-- Slightly stronger than `OuterMeasure.mono` having an intersection with `p.support`. -/
theorem toOuterMeasure_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ p.support ⊆ t) :
p.toOuterMeasure s ≤ p.toOuterMeasure t :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (toOuterMeasure_apply_inter_support p s).symm) (p.toOuterMeasure.mono h)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_of_inter_support_eq {s t : Set α}
(h : s ∩ p.support = t ∩ p.support) : p.toOuterMeasure s = p.toOuterMeasure t :=
le_antisymm (p.toOuterMeasure_mono (h.symm ▸ Set.inter_subset_left))
| (p.toOuterMeasure_mono (h ▸ Set.inter_subset_left))
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Basic.lean | 196 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.MeasurableEquiv
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Regular measures
A measure is `OuterRegular` if the measure of any measurable set `A` is the infimum of `μ U` over
all open sets `U` containing `A`.
A measure is `WeaklyRegular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to closed sets: the measure of any open set `U`
is the supremum of `μ F` over all closed sets `F` contained in `U`.
A measure is `Regular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is finite on compact sets;
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to compacts closed sets: the measure of any open
set `U` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact sets `K` contained in `U`.
A measure is `InnerRegular` if it is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact
sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact
sets contained in `s`.
A measure is `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` if it is inner regular for measurable sets of finite
measure with respect to compact sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum
of `μ K` over all compact sets contained in `s`.
There is a reason for this zoo of regularity classes:
* A finite measure on a metric space is always weakly regular. Therefore, in probability theory,
weakly regular measures play a prominent role.
* In locally compact topological spaces, there are two competing notions of Radon measures: the
ones that are regular, and the ones that are inner regular. For any of these two notions, there is
a Riesz representation theorem, and an existence and uniqueness statement for the Haar measure in
locally compact topological groups. The two notions coincide in sigma-compact spaces, but they
differ in general, so it is worth having the two of them.
* Both notions of Haar measure satisfy the weaker notion `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`, so it is worth
trying to express theorems using this weaker notion whenever possible, to make sure that it
applies to both Haar measures simultaneously.
While traditional textbooks on measure theory on locally compact spaces emphasize regular measures,
more recent textbooks emphasize that inner regular Haar measures are better behaved than regular
Haar measures, so we will develop both notions.
The five conditions above are registered as typeclasses for a measure `μ`, and implications between
them are recorded as instances. For example, in a Hausdorff topological space, regularity implies
weak regularity. Also, regularity or inner regularity both imply `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`.
In a regular locally compact finite measure space, then regularity, inner regularity
and `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` are all equivalent.
In order to avoid code duplication, we also define a measure `μ` to be `InnerRegularWRT` for sets
satisfying a predicate `q` with respect to sets satisfying a predicate `p` if for any set
`U ∈ {U | q U}` and a number `r < μ U` there exists `F ⊆ U` such that `p F` and `r < μ F`.
There are two main nontrivial results in the development below:
* `InnerRegularWRT.measurableSet_of_isOpen` shows that, for an outer regular measure, inner
regularity for open sets with respect to compact sets or closed sets implies inner regularity for
all measurable sets of finite measure (with respect to compact sets or closed sets respectively).
* `InnerRegularWRT.weaklyRegular_of_finite` shows that a finite measure which is inner regular for
open sets with respect to closed sets (for instance a finite measure on a metric space) is weakly
regular.
All other results are deduced from these ones.
Here is an example showing how regularity and inner regularity may differ even on locally compact
spaces. Consider the group `ℝ × ℝ` where the first factor has the discrete topology and the second
one the usual topology. It is a locally compact Hausdorff topological group, with Haar measure equal
to Lebesgue measure on each vertical fiber. Let us consider the regular version of Haar measure.
Then the set `ℝ × {0}` has infinite measure (by outer regularity), but any compact set it contains
has zero measure (as it is finite). In fact, this set only contains subset with measure zero or
infinity. The inner regular version of Haar measure, on the other hand, gives zero mass to the
set `ℝ × {0}`.
Another interesting example is the sum of the Dirac masses at rational points in the real line.
It is a σ-finite measure on a locally compact metric space, but it is not outer regular: for
outer regularity, one needs additional locally finite assumptions. On the other hand, it is
inner regular.
Several authors require both regularity and inner regularity for their measures. We have opted
for the more fine grained definitions above as they apply more generally.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is outer regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a topological
space is regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is weakly regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT μ p q`: a non-typeclass predicate saying that a measure `μ`
is inner regular for sets satisfying `q` with respect to sets satisfying `p`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact sets.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ`
on a topological space is inner regular for measurable sets of finite measure with respect to
compact sets.
## Main results
### Outer regular measures
* `Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, the measure of a
set is the infimum of the measure of open sets containing it.
* `Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, for every set `s`
and `r > μ s` there exists an open superset `U ⊇ s` of measure less than `r`.
* push forward of an outer regular measure is outer regular, and scalar multiplication of a regular
measure by a finite number is outer regular.
### Weakly regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isClosed`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a closed `F ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isClosed_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isClosed_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a closed subset (stated as
`r < μ F` and `μ s < μ F + ε`, respectively).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_of_isFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a finite measure on a metric space is weakly regular (in fact, a pseudo
metrizable space is enough);
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_secondCountable_of_locallyFinite`
is an instance registering that a locally finite measure on a second countable metric space (or
even a pseudo metrizable space) is weakly regular.
### Regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isCompact`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a compact `K ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular.of_sigmaCompactSpace_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space is regular (in
fact, an emetric space is enough).
### Inner regular measures
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of a measurable set is the
supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact`: for a measurable set `s` and `r < μ s`, there exists a
compact `K ⊆ s` of measure greater than `r`;
### Inner regular measures for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isCompact_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a compact subset (stated as
`r < μ K` and `μ s < μ K + ε`, respectively).
## Implementation notes
The main nontrivial statement is `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular.weaklyRegular_of_finite`,
expressing that in a finite measure space, if every open set can be approximated from inside by
closed sets, then the measure is in fact weakly regular. To prove that we show that any measurable
set can be approximated from inside by closed sets and from outside by open sets. This statement is
proved by measurable induction, starting from open sets and checking that it is stable by taking
complements (this is the point of this condition, being symmetrical between inside and outside) and
countable disjoint unions.
Once this statement is proved, one deduces results for `σ`-finite measures from this statement, by
restricting them to finite measure sets (and proving that this restriction is weakly regular, using
again the same statement).
For non-Hausdorff spaces, one may argue whether the right condition for inner regularity is with
respect to compact sets, or to compact closed sets. For instance,
[Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 4, 411J)][fremlin_vol4] considers measures which are inner
regular with respect to compact closed sets (and calls them *tight*). However, since most of the
literature uses mere compact sets, we have chosen to follow this convention. It doesn't make a
difference in Hausdorff spaces, of course. In locally compact topological groups, the two
conditions coincide, since if a compact set `k` is contained in a measurable set `u`, then the
closure of `k` is a compact closed set still contained in `u`, see
`IsCompact.closure_subset_of_measurableSet_of_group`.
## References
[Halmos, Measure Theory, §52][halmos1950measure]. Note that Halmos uses an unusual definition of
Borel sets (for him, they are elements of the `σ`-algebra generated by compact sets!), so his
proofs or statements do not apply directly.
[Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures][billingsley1999]
[Bogachev, Measure Theory, volume 2, Theorem 7.11.1][bogachev2007]
-/
open Set Filter ENNReal NNReal TopologicalSpace
open scoped symmDiff Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- We say that a measure `μ` is *inner regular* with respect to predicates `p q : Set α → Prop`,
if for every `U` such that `q U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a subset `K ⊆ U` satisfying `p K`
of measure greater than `r`.
This definition is used to prove some facts about regular and weakly regular measures without
repeating the proofs. -/
def InnerRegularWRT {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (p q : Set α → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃U⦄, q U → ∀ r < μ U, ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ r < μ K
namespace InnerRegularWRT
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {p q : Set α → Prop} {U : Set α}
{ε : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem measure_eq_iSup (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (hU : q U) :
μ U = ⨆ (K) (_ : K ⊆ U) (_ : p K), μ K := by
refine
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun r hr => ?_) (iSup₂_le fun K hK => iSup_le fun _ => μ.mono hK)
simpa only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using H hU r hr
theorem exists_subset_lt_add (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (h0 : p ∅) (hU : q U) (hμU : μ U ≠ ∞)
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ μ U < μ K + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ U) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· refine ⟨∅, empty_subset _, h0, ?_⟩
rwa [measure_empty, h₀, zero_add, pos_iff_ne_zero]
· rcases H hU _ (ENNReal.sub_lt_self hμU h₀ hε) with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKU, hKc, ENNReal.lt_add_of_sub_lt_right (Or.inl hμU) hrK⟩
protected theorem map {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
{μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K))
(hB₂ : ∀ U, qb U → MeasurableSet U) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf (hB₂ _ hU)] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
exact hK.trans_le (le_map_apply_image hf _)
theorem map' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) (f : α ≃ᵐ β) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K)) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [f.map_apply U] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
rwa [f.map_apply, f.preimage_image]
theorem smul (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : InnerRegularWRT (c • μ) p q := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [smul_apply, H.measure_eq_iSup hU, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iSup, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using hr
theorem trans {q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (H' : InnerRegularWRT μ q q') :
InnerRegularWRT μ p q' := by
intro U hU r hr
rcases H' hU r hr with ⟨F, hFU, hqF, hF⟩; rcases H hqF _ hF with ⟨K, hKF, hpK, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKF.trans hFU, hpK, hrK⟩
theorem rfl {p : Set α → Prop} : InnerRegularWRT μ p p :=
fun U hU _r hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, hU, hr⟩
theorem of_imp (h : ∀ s, q s → p s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p q :=
fun U hU _ hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, h U hU, hr⟩
theorem mono {p' q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q)
(h : ∀ s, q' s → q s) (h' : ∀ s, p s → p' s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p' q' :=
of_imp h' |>.trans H |>.trans (of_imp h)
end InnerRegularWRT
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
section Classes
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- A measure `μ` is outer regular if `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for a measurable set `A`.
This definition implies the same equality for any (not necessarily measurable) set, see
`Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen`. -/
class OuterRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected outerRegular :
∀ ⦃A : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet A → ∀ r > μ A, ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r
/-- A measure `μ` is regular if
- it is finite on all compact sets;
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using compact sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ U compact}` for `U` open. -/
class Regular (μ : Measure α) : Prop extends IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ, OuterRegular μ where
innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsOpen
/-- A measure `μ` is weakly regular if
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using closed sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(F) | F ⊆ U closed}` for `U` open. -/
class WeaklyRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop extends OuterRegular μ where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular if, for any measurable set `s`, then
`μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`. -/
class InnerRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact MeasurableSet
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets:
for any measurable set `s` with finite measure, then `μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`.
The main interest of this class is that it is satisfied for both natural Haar measures (the
regular one and the inner regular one). -/
class InnerRegularCompactLTTop (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A regular measure is weakly regular in an R₁ space. -/
instance (priority := 100) Regular.weaklyRegular [R1Space α] [Regular μ] :
WeaklyRegular μ where
innerRegular := fun _U hU r hr ↦
let ⟨K, KU, K_comp, hK⟩ := Regular.innerRegular hU r hr
⟨closure K, K_comp.closure_subset_of_isOpen hU KU, isClosed_closure,
hK.trans_le (measure_mono subset_closure)⟩
end Classes
namespace OuterRegular
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
instance zero : OuterRegular (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨fun A _ _r hr => ⟨univ, subset_univ A, isOpen_univ, hr⟩⟩
/-- Given `r` larger than the measure of a set `A`, there exists an open superset of `A` with
measure less than `r`. -/
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : μ A < r) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r := by
rcases OuterRegular.outerRegular (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ A) r
(by rwa [measure_toMeasurable]) with
⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, (subset_toMeasurable _ _).trans hAU, hUo, hU⟩
/-- For an outer regular measure, the measure of a set is the infimum of the measures of open sets
containing it. -/
theorem _root_.Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
μ A = ⨅ (U : Set α) (_ : A ⊆ U) (_ : IsOpen U), μ U := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun s hs => le_iInf fun _ => μ.mono hs) ?_
refine le_of_forall_lt' fun r hr => ?_
simpa only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt r hr
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (hA : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ A + ε :=
A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ (ENNReal.lt_add_right hA hε)
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_le_add (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ A + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ A) ∞ with (H | H)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, isOpen_univ, by simp only [H, _root_.top_add, le_top]⟩
· rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add H hε with ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU.le⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt [OuterRegular μ] {A : Set α}
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hA' : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ A) < ε := by
rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add hA' hε with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
use U, hAU, hUo, hU.trans_le le_top
exact measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hA.nullMeasurableSet hAU hA' hU
protected theorem map [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (f : α ≃ₜ β) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
(Measure.map f μ).OuterRegular := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply f.measurable hA, ← f.image_symm] at hr
rcases Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ r hr with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
have : IsOpen (f.symm ⁻¹' U) := hUo.preimage f.symm.continuous
refine ⟨f.symm ⁻¹' U, image_subset_iff.1 hAU, this, ?_⟩
rwa [map_apply f.measurable this.measurableSet, f.preimage_symm, f.preimage_image]
protected theorem smul (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ∞) :
(x • μ).OuterRegular := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0)
· rw [zero_smul]
exact OuterRegular.zero
· refine ⟨fun A _ r hr => ?_⟩
rw [smul_apply, A.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne h0 hx, gt_iff_lt, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using hr
instance smul_nnreal (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] (c : ℝ≥0) :
OuterRegular (c • μ) :=
OuterRegular.smul μ coe_ne_top
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If the restrictions of a measure to countably many open sets covering the space are
outer regular, then the measure itself is outer regular. -/
lemma of_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h : ∀ n, OuterRegular (μ.restrict (s n))) (h' : ∀ n, IsOpen (s n)) (h'' : univ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n) :
OuterRegular μ := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
have HA : μ A < ∞ := lt_of_lt_of_le hr le_top
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n) := fun n => (h' n).measurableSet
-- Note that `A = ⋃ n, A ∩ disjointed s n`. We replace `A` with this sequence.
obtain ⟨A, hAm, hAs, hAd, rfl⟩ :
∃ A' : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (A' n)) ∧
(∀ n, A' n ⊆ s n) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on A') ∧ A = ⋃ n, A' n := by
refine
⟨fun n => A ∩ disjointed s n, fun n => hA.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hm _), fun n =>
inter_subset_right.trans (disjointed_subset _ _),
(disjoint_disjointed s).mono fun k l hkl => hkl.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_disjointed, univ_subset_iff.mp h'', inter_univ]
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, add_comm] at hδε
have : ∀ n, ∃ U ⊇ A n, IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ (A n) + δ n := by
intro n
have H₁ : ∀ t, μ.restrict (s n) t = μ (t ∩ s n) := fun t => restrict_apply' (hm n)
have Ht : μ.restrict (s n) (A n) ≠ ∞ := by
rw [H₁]
exact ((measure_mono (inter_subset_left.trans (subset_iUnion A n))).trans_lt HA).ne
rcases (A n).exists_isOpen_lt_add Ht (δ0 n).ne' with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
rw [H₁, H₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (hAs _)] at hU
exact ⟨U ∩ s n, subset_inter hAU (hAs _), hUo.inter (h' n), hU⟩
choose U hAU hUo hU using this
refine ⟨⋃ n, U n, iUnion_mono hAU, isOpen_iUnion hUo, ?_⟩
calc
μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (μ (A n) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => (hU n).le
_ = ∑' n, μ (A n) + ∑' n, δ n := ENNReal.tsum_add
_ = μ (⋃ n, A n) + ∑' n, δ n := (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (measure_iUnion hAd hAm).symm rfl)
_ < r := hδε
/-- See also `IsCompact.measure_closure` for a version
that assumes the `σ`-algebra to be the Borel `σ`-algebra but makes no assumptions on `μ`. -/
lemma measure_closure_eq_of_isCompact [R1Space α] [OuterRegular μ]
{k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k) : μ (closure k) = μ k := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (measure_mono subset_closure)
simp only [measure_eq_iInf_isOpen k, le_iInf_iff]
intro u ku u_open
exact measure_mono (hk.closure_subset_of_isOpen u_open ku)
end OuterRegular
/-- If a measure `μ` admits finite spanning open sets such that the restriction of `μ` to each set
is outer regular, then the original measure is outer regular as well. -/
protected theorem FiniteSpanningSetsIn.outerRegular
[TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
(s : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn { U | IsOpen U ∧ OuterRegular (μ.restrict U) }) :
OuterRegular μ :=
OuterRegular.of_restrict (s := fun n ↦ s.set n) (fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).2)
(fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).1) s.spanning.symm.subset
namespace InnerRegularWRT
variable {p : Set α → Prop}
/-- If the restrictions of a measure to a monotone sequence of sets covering the space are
inner regular for some property `p` and all measurable sets, then the measure itself is
inner regular. -/
lemma of_restrict {μ : Measure α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h : ∀ n, InnerRegularWRT (μ.restrict (s n)) p MeasurableSet)
(hs : univ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n) (hmono : Monotone s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p MeasurableSet := by
intro F hF r hr
have hBU : ⋃ n, F ∩ s n = F := by rw [← inter_iUnion, univ_subset_iff.mp hs, inter_univ]
have : μ F = ⨆ n, μ (F ∩ s n) := by
rw [← (monotone_const.inter hmono).measure_iUnion, hBU]
rw [this] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [← restrict_apply hF] at hn
rcases h n hF _ hn with ⟨K, KF, hKp, hK⟩
exact ⟨K, KF, hKp, hK.trans_le (restrict_apply_le _ _)⟩
/-- If `μ` is inner regular for measurable finite measure sets with respect to some class of sets,
then its restriction to any set is also inner regular for measurable finite measure sets, with
respect to the same class of sets. -/
lemma restrict (h : InnerRegularWRT μ p (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞)) (A : Set α) :
InnerRegularWRT (μ.restrict A) p (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ.restrict A s ≠ ∞) := by
rintro s ⟨s_meas, hs⟩ r hr
rw [restrict_apply s_meas] at hs
obtain ⟨K, K_subs, pK, rK⟩ : ∃ K, K ⊆ (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ A)) ∩ s ∧ p K ∧ r < μ K := by
have : r < μ ((toMeasurable μ (s ∩ A)) ∩ s) := by
apply hr.trans_le
rw [restrict_apply s_meas]
exact measure_mono <| subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable μ (s ∩ A)) inter_subset_left
refine h ⟨(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter s_meas, ?_⟩ _ this
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt _ hs.lt_top).ne
rw [← measure_toMeasurable (s ∩ A)]
exact measure_mono inter_subset_left
refine ⟨K, K_subs.trans inter_subset_right, pK, ?_⟩
calc
r < μ K := rK
_ = μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ A)) K := by
rw [restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ (s ∩ A))]
congr
apply (inter_eq_left.2 ?_).symm
exact K_subs.trans inter_subset_left
_ = μ.restrict (s ∩ A) K := by rwa [restrict_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ μ.restrict A K := Measure.le_iff'.1 (restrict_mono inter_subset_right le_rfl) K
/-- If `μ` is inner regular for measurable finite measure sets with respect to some class of sets,
then its restriction to any finite measure set is also inner regular for measurable sets with
respect to the same class of sets. -/
lemma restrict_of_measure_ne_top (h : InnerRegularWRT μ p (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞))
{A : Set α} (hA : μ A ≠ ∞) :
InnerRegularWRT (μ.restrict A) p (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s) := by
have : Fact (μ A < ∞) := ⟨hA.lt_top⟩
exact (restrict h A).trans (of_imp (fun s hs ↦ ⟨hs, measure_ne_top _ _⟩))
/-- Given a σ-finite measure, any measurable set can be approximated from inside by a measurable
set of finite measure. -/
lemma of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] :
InnerRegularWRT μ (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞) (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s) := by
intro s hs r hr
set B : ℕ → Set α := spanningSets μ
have hBU : ⋃ n, s ∩ B n = s := by rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets, inter_univ]
have : μ s = ⨆ n, μ (s ∩ B n) := by
rw [← (monotone_const.inter (monotone_spanningSets μ)).measure_iUnion, hBU]
rw [this] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ B n, inter_subset_left, ⟨hs.inter (measurableSet_spanningSets μ n), ?_⟩, hn⟩
exact ((measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt (measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n)).ne
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- If a measure is inner regular (using closed or compact sets) for open sets, then every
measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a (closed or compact) subset. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_isOpen [OuterRegular μ] (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p IsOpen)
(hd : ∀ ⦃s U⦄, p s → IsOpen U → p (s \ U)) :
InnerRegularWRT μ p fun s => MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞ := by
rintro s ⟨hs, hμs⟩ r hr
have h0 : p ∅ := by
have : 0 < μ univ := (bot_le.trans_lt hr).trans_le (measure_mono (subset_univ _))
obtain ⟨K, -, hK, -⟩ : ∃ K, K ⊆ univ ∧ p K ∧ 0 < μ K := H isOpen_univ _ this
simpa using hd hK isOpen_univ
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hεs, rfl⟩ : ∃ ε ≠ 0, ε + ε ≤ μ s ∧ r = μ s - (ε + ε) := by
use (μ s - r) / 2
simp [*, hr.le, ENNReal.add_halves, ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel, le_add_right, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
rcases hs.exists_isOpen_diff_lt hμs hε with ⟨U, hsU, hUo, hUt, hμU⟩
rcases (U \ s).exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ hμU with ⟨U', hsU', hU'o, hμU'⟩
replace hsU' := diff_subset_comm.1 hsU'
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add h0 hUo hUt.ne hε with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hKr⟩
refine ⟨K \ U', fun x hx => hsU' ⟨hKU hx.1, hx.2⟩, hd hKc hU'o, ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add hεs ?_⟩
calc
μ s ≤ μ U := μ.mono hsU
_ < μ K + ε := hKr
_ ≤ μ (K \ U') + μ U' + ε := add_le_add_right (tsub_le_iff_right.1 le_measure_diff) _
_ ≤ μ (K \ U') + ε + ε := by gcongr
_ = μ (K \ U') + (ε + ε) := add_assoc _ _ _
open Finset in
/-- In a finite measure space, assume that any open set can be approximated from inside by closed
sets. Then the measure is weakly regular. -/
theorem weaklyRegular_of_finite [BorelSpace α] (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen) : WeaklyRegular μ := by
have hfin : ∀ {s}, μ s ≠ ∞ := @(measure_ne_top μ)
suffices ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → ∀ ε, ε ≠ 0 → ∃ F, F ⊆ s ∧ ∃ U, U ⊇ s ∧
IsClosed F ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ s ≤ μ F + ε ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε by
refine
{ outerRegular := fun s hs r hr => ?_
innerRegular := H }
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hsr', hr'r⟩
rcases this s hs _ (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hsr').ne' with ⟨-, -, U, hsU, -, hUo, -, H⟩
refine ⟨U, hsU, hUo, ?_⟩
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le hsr'.le] at H
exact H.trans_lt hr'r
apply MeasurableSet.induction_on_open
/- The proof is by measurable induction: we should check that the property is true for the empty
set, for open sets, and is stable by taking the complement and by taking countable disjoint
unions. The point of the property we are proving is that it is stable by taking complements
(exchanging the roles of closed and open sets and thanks to the finiteness of the measure). -/
-- check for open set
· intro U hU ε hε
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add isClosed_empty hU hfin hε with ⟨F, hsF, hFc, hF⟩
exact ⟨F, hsF, U, Subset.rfl, hFc, hU, hF.le, le_self_add⟩
-- check for complements
· rintro s hs H ε hε
rcases H ε hε with ⟨F, hFs, U, hsU, hFc, hUo, hF, hU⟩
refine
⟨Uᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hsU, Fᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hFs, hUo.isClosed_compl,
hFc.isOpen_compl, ?_⟩
simp only [measure_compl_le_add_iff, *, hUo.measurableSet, hFc.measurableSet, true_and]
-- check for disjoint unions
· intro s hsd hsm H ε ε0
have ε0' : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne'
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' ε0' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩
choose F hFs U hsU hFc hUo hF hU using fun n => H n (δ n) (δ0 n).ne'
-- the approximating closed set is constructed by considering finitely many sets `s i`, which
-- cover all the measure up to `ε/2`, approximating each of these by a closed set `F i`, and
-- taking the union of these (finitely many) `F i`.
have : Tendsto (fun t => (∑ k ∈ t, μ (s k)) + ε / 2) atTop (𝓝 <| μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε / 2) := by
rw [measure_iUnion hsd hsm]
exact Tendsto.add ENNReal.summable.hasSum tendsto_const_nhds
rcases (this.eventually <| lt_mem_nhds <| ENNReal.lt_add_right hfin ε0').exists with ⟨t, ht⟩
-- the approximating open set is constructed by taking for each `s n` an approximating open set
-- `U n` with measure at most `μ (s n) + δ n` for a summable `δ`, and taking the union of these.
refine
⟨⋃ k ∈ t, F k, iUnion_mono fun k => iUnion_subset fun _ => hFs _, ⋃ n, U n, iUnion_mono hsU,
isClosed_biUnion_finset fun k _ => hFc k, isOpen_iUnion hUo, ht.le.trans ?_, ?_⟩
· calc
(∑ k ∈ t, μ (s k)) + ε / 2 ≤ ((∑ k ∈ t, μ (F k)) + ∑ k ∈ t, δ k) + ε / 2 := by
rw [← sum_add_distrib]
gcongr
apply hF
_ ≤ (∑ k ∈ t, μ (F k)) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := by
gcongr
| exact (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _).trans hδε.le
_ = μ (⋃ k ∈ t, F k) + ε := by
rw [measure_biUnion_finset, add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
exacts [fun k _ n _ hkn => (hsd hkn).mono (hFs k) (hFs n),
fun k _ => (hFc k).measurableSet]
· calc
μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (μ (s n) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hU
_ = μ (⋃ n, s n) + ∑' n, δ n := by rw [measure_iUnion hsd hsm, ENNReal.tsum_add]
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε := add_le_add_left (hδε.le.trans ENNReal.half_le_self) _
/-- In a metrizable space (or even a pseudo metrizable space), an open set can be approximated from
inside by closed sets. -/
theorem of_pseudoMetrizableSpace {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [PseudoMetrizableSpace X]
[MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X) : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen := by
let A : PseudoMetricSpace X := TopologicalSpace.pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric X
intro U hU r hr
rcases hU.exists_iUnion_isClosed with ⟨F, F_closed, -, rfl, F_mono⟩
rw [F_mono.measure_iUnion] at hr
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨F n, subset_iUnion _ _, F_closed n, hn⟩
/-- In a `σ`-compact space, any closed set can be approximated by a compact subset. -/
theorem isCompact_isClosed {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [SigmaCompactSpace X]
[MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X) : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsClosed := by
intro F hF r hr
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Regular.lean | 602 | 627 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Ralf Stephan
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
/-!
# Smooth numbers
For `s : Finset ℕ` we define the set `Nat.factoredNumbers s` of "`s`-factored numbers"
consisting of the positive natural numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`, and
we provide some API for this.
We then define the set `Nat.smoothNumbers n` consisting of the positive natural numbers all of
whose prime factors are strictly less than `n`. This is the special case `s = Finset.range n`
of the set of `s`-factored numbers.
We also define the finite set `Nat.primesBelow n` to be the set of prime numbers less than `n`.
The main definition `Nat.equivProdNatSmoothNumbers` establishes the bijection between
`ℕ × (smoothNumbers p)` and `smoothNumbers (p+1)` given by sending `(e, n)` to `p^e * n`.
Here `p` is a prime number. It is obtained from the more general bijection between
`ℕ × (factoredNumbers s)` and `factoredNumbers (s ∪ {p})`; see `Nat.equivProdNatFactoredNumbers`.
Additionally, we define `Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo N n` as the `Finset` of `n`-smooth numbers
up to and including `N`, and similarly `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo` for its complement in `{1, ..., N}`,
and we provide some API, in particular bounds for their cardinalities; see
`Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo_card_le` and `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo_card_le`.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Nat
/-- `primesBelow n` is the set of primes less than `n` as a `Finset`. -/
def primesBelow (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := {p ∈ Finset.range n | p.Prime}
@[simp]
lemma primesBelow_zero : primesBelow 0 = ∅ := by
rw [primesBelow, Finset.range_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
lemma mem_primesBelow {k n : ℕ} :
n ∈ primesBelow k ↔ n < k ∧ n.Prime := by simp [primesBelow]
lemma prime_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p.Prime :=
(Finset.mem_filter.mp h).2
lemma lt_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p < n :=
Finset.mem_range.mp <| Finset.mem_of_mem_filter p h
lemma primesBelow_succ (n : ℕ) :
primesBelow (n + 1) = if n.Prime then insert n (primesBelow n) else primesBelow n := by
rw [primesBelow, primesBelow, Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
lemma not_mem_primesBelow (n : ℕ) : n ∉ primesBelow n :=
fun hn ↦ (lt_of_mem_primesBelow hn).false
/-!
### `s`-factored numbers
-/
/-- `factoredNumbers s`, for a finite set `s` of natural numbers, is the set of positive natural
numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`. -/
def factoredNumbers (s : Finset ℕ) : Set ℕ := {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
lemma mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Membership in `Nat.factoredNumbers n` is decidable. -/
instance (s : Finset ℕ) : DecidablePred (· ∈ factoredNumbers s) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun x ↦ x ∈ {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
/-- A number that divides an `s`-factored number is itself `s`-factored. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_of_dvd {s : Finset ℕ} {m k : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s)
(h' : k ∣ m) :
k ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h
have hk := ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero h₁ h'
refine ⟨hk, fun p hp ↦ h₂ p ?_⟩
rw [mem_primeFactorsList <| by assumption] at hp ⊢
exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.trans h'⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if `m` is nonzero and all prime divisors `≤ m` of `m`
are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ≤ m, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
simp_rw [mem_factoredNumbers, mem_primeFactorsList']
exact ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ ⟨H₀, fun p _ hp₂ hp₃ ↦ H₁ p ⟨hp₂, hp₃, H₀⟩⟩,
fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦
⟨H₀, fun p ⟨hp₁, hp₂, hp₃⟩ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp₃) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂⟩⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if all prime divisors of `m` are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers' {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ ∀ p, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := exists_infinite_primes (1 + Finset.sup s id)
rw [mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le]
refine ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ fun p hp₁ hp₂ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H₀) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂,
fun H ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ lt_irrefl p ?_, fun p _ ↦ H p⟩⟩
calc
p ≤ s.sup id := Finset.le_sup (f := @id ℕ) <| H p hp₂ <| h.symm ▸ dvd_zero p
_ < 1 + s.sup id := lt_one_add _
_ ≤ p := hp₁
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) : m ≠ 0 :=
h.1
/-- The `Finset` of prime factors of an `s`-factored number is contained in `s`. -/
lemma primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ}
(hm : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
m.primeFactors ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_factoredNumbers] at hm
exact fun n hn ↦ hm.2 n (mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.mp hn)
/-- If `m ≠ 0` and the `Finset` of prime factors of `m` is contained in `s`, then `m`
is `s`-factored. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0)
(hp : m.primeFactors ⊆ s) :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
rw [mem_factoredNumbers]
exact ⟨hm, fun p hp' ↦ hp <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.mpr hp'⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if `m ≠ 0` and its `Finset` of prime factors
is contained in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_iff_primeFactors_subset {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ m.primeFactors ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨ne_zero_of_mem_factoredNumbers h, primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers h⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp]
lemma factoredNumbers_empty : factoredNumbers ∅ = {1} := by
ext m
simp only [mem_factoredNumbers, Finset.not_mem_empty, ← List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem,
primeFactorsList_eq_nil, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, ne_and_eq_iff_right zero_ne_one,
false_or, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
/-- The product of two `s`-factored numbers is again `s`-factored. -/
lemma mul_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m n : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ factoredNumbers s)
(hn : n ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
m * n ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
have hm' := primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers hm
have hn' := primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers hn
exact mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset (mul_ne_zero hm.1 hn.1)
<| primeFactors_mul hm.1 hn.1 ▸ Finset.union_subset hm' hn'
/-- The product of the prime factors of `n` that are in `s` is an `s`-factored number. -/
lemma prod_mem_factoredNumbers (s : Finset ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
(n.primeFactorsList.filter (· ∈ s)).prod ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
have h₀ : (n.primeFactorsList.filter (· ∈ s)).prod ≠ 0 :=
List.prod_ne_zero fun h ↦ (pos_of_mem_primeFactorsList (List.mem_of_mem_filter h)).false
refine ⟨h₀, fun p hp ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := (mem_primeFactorsList h₀).mp hp
simpa only [decide_eq_true_eq] using List.of_mem_filter <| mem_list_primes_of_dvd_prod H₁.prime
(fun _ hq ↦ (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList (List.mem_of_mem_filter hq)).prime) H₂
/-- The sets of `s`-factored and of `s ∪ {N}`-factored numbers are the same when `N` is not prime.
See `Nat.equivProdNatFactoredNumbers` for when `N` is prime. -/
lemma factoredNumbers_insert (s : Finset ℕ) {N : ℕ} (hN : ¬ N.Prime) :
factoredNumbers (insert N s) = factoredNumbers s := by
ext m
refine ⟨fun hm ↦ ⟨hm.1, fun p hp ↦ ?_⟩,
fun hm ↦ ⟨hm.1, fun p hp ↦ Finset.mem_insert_of_mem <| hm.2 p hp⟩⟩
exact Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hm.2 p hp)
fun h ↦ hN <| h ▸ prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp
@[gcongr] lemma factoredNumbers_mono {s t : Finset ℕ} (hst : s ≤ t) :
factoredNumbers s ⊆ factoredNumbers t :=
fun _ hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, fun p hp ↦ hst <| hx.2 p hp⟩
/-- The non-zero non-`s`-factored numbers are `≥ N` when `s` contains all primes less than `N`. -/
lemma factoredNumbers_compl {N : ℕ} {s : Finset ℕ} (h : primesBelow N ≤ s) :
(factoredNumbers s)ᶜ \ {0} ⊆ {n | N ≤ n} := by
intro n hn
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_factoredNumbers, Set.mem_diff, ne_eq, not_and, not_forall,
not_lt, exists_prop, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hn
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := hn.1 hn.2
have : N ≤ p := by
contrapose! hp₂
exact h <| mem_primesBelow.mpr ⟨hp₂, prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp₁⟩
exact this.trans <| le_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp₁
/-- If `p` is a prime and `n` is `s`-factored, then every product `p^e * n`
is `s ∪ {p}`-factored. -/
lemma pow_mul_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {p n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (e : ℕ)
(hn : n ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
p ^ e * n ∈ factoredNumbers (insert p s) := by
have hp' := pow_ne_zero e hp.ne_zero
refine ⟨mul_ne_zero hp' hn.1, fun q hq ↦ ?_⟩
rcases (mem_primeFactorsList_mul hp' hn.1).mp hq with H | H
· rw [mem_primeFactorsList hp'] at H
rw [(prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq H.1 hp).mp <| H.1.dvd_of_dvd_pow H.2]
exact Finset.mem_insert_self p s
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem <| hn.2 _ H
/-- If `p ∉ s` is a prime and `n` is `s`-factored, then `p` and `n` are coprime. -/
lemma Prime.factoredNumbers_coprime {s : Finset ℕ} {p n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hs : p ∉ s)
(hn : n ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
Nat.Coprime p n := by
rw [hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd, ← mem_primeFactorsList_iff_dvd hn.1 hp]
exact fun H ↦ hs <| hn.2 p H
/-- If `f : ℕ → F` is multiplicative on coprime arguments, `p ∉ s` is a prime and `m`
is `s`-factored, then `f (p^e * m) = f (p^e) * f m`. -/
lemma factoredNumbers.map_prime_pow_mul {F : Type*} [Mul F] {f : ℕ → F}
(hmul : ∀ {m n}, Coprime m n → f (m * n) = f m * f n) {s : Finset ℕ} {p : ℕ}
(hp : p.Prime) (hs : p ∉ s) (e : ℕ) {m : factoredNumbers s} :
f (p ^ e * m) = f (p ^ e) * f m :=
hmul <| Coprime.pow_left _ <| hp.factoredNumbers_coprime hs <| Subtype.mem m
open List Perm in
/-- We establish the bijection from `ℕ × factoredNumbers s` to `factoredNumbers (s ∪ {p})`
given by `(e, n) ↦ p^e * n` when `p ∉ s` is a prime. See `Nat.factoredNumbers_insert` for
when `p` is not prime. -/
def equivProdNatFactoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hs : p ∉ s) :
ℕ × factoredNumbers s ≃ factoredNumbers (insert p s) where
toFun := fun ⟨e, n⟩ ↦ ⟨p ^ e * n, pow_mul_mem_factoredNumbers hp e n.2⟩
invFun := fun ⟨m, _⟩ ↦ (m.factorization p,
⟨(m.primeFactorsList.filter (· ∈ s)).prod, prod_mem_factoredNumbers ..⟩)
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨e, m, hm₀, hm⟩
simp (config := { etaStruct := .all }) only
[Set.coe_setOf, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
constructor
· rw [factorization_mul (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp <| Nat.pow_pos hp.pos) hm₀]
simp only [factorization_pow, Finsupp.coe_add, Finsupp.coe_smul, nsmul_eq_mul,
Pi.natCast_def, cast_id, Pi.add_apply, Pi.mul_apply, hp.factorization_self,
mul_one, add_eq_left]
rw [← primeFactorsList_count_eq, count_eq_zero]
exact fun H ↦ hs (hm p H)
· nth_rewrite 2 [← prod_primeFactorsList hm₀]
refine prod_eq <|
(filter _ <| perm_primeFactorsList_mul (pow_ne_zero e hp.ne_zero) hm₀).trans ?_
rw [filter_append, hp.primeFactorsList_pow,
filter_eq_nil_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ by rw [mem_replicate] at hq; simp [hq.2, hs],
nil_append, filter_eq_self.mpr fun q hq ↦ by simp only [hm q hq, decide_true]]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨m, hm₀, hm⟩
simp only [Set.coe_setOf, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
rw [← primeFactorsList_count_eq, ← prod_replicate, ← prod_append]
nth_rewrite 3 [← prod_primeFactorsList hm₀]
have : m.primeFactorsList.filter (· = p) = m.primeFactorsList.filter (¬ · ∈ s) := by
refine (filter_congr fun q hq ↦ ?_).symm
simp only [decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not, decide_eq_true_eq]
rcases Finset.mem_insert.mp <| hm _ hq with h | h
· simp only [h, hs, decide_false, Bool.not_false, decide_true]
· simp only [h, decide_true, Bool.not_true, false_eq_decide_iff]
exact fun H ↦ hs <| H ▸ h
refine prod_eq <| (filter_eq p).symm ▸ this ▸ perm_append_comm.trans ?_
simp only [decide_not]
exact filter_append_perm (· ∈ s) (primeFactorsList m)
@[simp]
lemma equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply {s : Finset ℕ} {p e m : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hs : p ∉ s)
(hm : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hp hs (e, ⟨m, hm⟩) = p ^ e * m := rfl
@[simp]
lemma equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply' {s : Finset ℕ} {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hs : p ∉ s)
(x : ℕ × factoredNumbers s) :
equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hp hs x = p ^ x.1 * x.2 := rfl
/-!
### `n`-smooth numbers
-/
/-- `smoothNumbers n` is the set of *`n`-smooth positive natural numbers*, i.e., the
positive natural numbers all of whose prime factors are less than `n`. -/
def smoothNumbers (n : ℕ) : Set ℕ := {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p < n}
lemma mem_smoothNumbers {n m : ℕ} : m ∈ smoothNumbers n ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p < n :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The `n`-smooth numbers agree with the `Finset.range n`-factored numbers. -/
lemma smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers (n : ℕ) :
smoothNumbers n = factoredNumbers (Finset.range n) := by
simp only [smoothNumbers, ne_eq, mem_primeFactorsList', and_imp, factoredNumbers,
Finset.mem_range]
/-- The `n`-smooth numbers agree with the `primesBelow n`-factored numbers. -/
lemma smmoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers_primesBelow (n : ℕ) :
smoothNumbers n = factoredNumbers n.primesBelow := by
rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers]
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (fun m hm ↦ ?_) <| factoredNumbers_mono Finset.mem_of_mem_filter
simp_rw [mem_factoredNumbers'] at hm ⊢
exact fun p hp hp' ↦ mem_primesBelow.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.mp <| hm p hp hp', hp⟩
/-- Membership in `Nat.smoothNumbers n` is decidable. -/
instance (n : ℕ) : DecidablePred (· ∈ smoothNumbers n) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun x ↦ x ∈ {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p < n}
/-- A number that divides an `n`-smooth number is itself `n`-smooth. -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers_of_dvd {n m k : ℕ} (h : m ∈ smoothNumbers n) (h' : k ∣ m) :
k ∈ smoothNumbers n := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers] at h ⊢
exact mem_factoredNumbers_of_dvd h h'
/-- `m` is `n`-smooth if and only if `m` is nonzero and all prime divisors `≤ m` of `m`
are less than `n`. -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers_iff_forall_le {n m : ℕ} :
m ∈ smoothNumbers n ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ≤ m, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p < n := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le, Finset.mem_range]
/-- `m` is `n`-smooth if and only if all prime divisors of `m` are less than `n`. -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers' {n m : ℕ} : m ∈ smoothNumbers n ↔ ∀ p, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p < n := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, mem_factoredNumbers', Finset.mem_range]
/-- The `Finset` of prime factors of an `n`-smooth number is contained in the `Finset`
of primes below `n`. -/
lemma primeFactors_subset_of_mem_smoothNumbers {m n : ℕ} (hms : m ∈ n.smoothNumbers) :
m.primeFactors ⊆ n.primesBelow :=
primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers <|
smmoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers_primesBelow n ▸ hms
/-- `m` is an `n`-smooth number if the `Finset` of its prime factors consists of numbers `< n`. -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset {m n : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0)
(hp : m.primeFactors ⊆ Finset.range n) : m ∈ n.smoothNumbers :=
smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers n ▸ mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset hm hp
/-- `m` is an `n`-smooth number if and only if `m ≠ 0` and the `Finset` of its prime factors
is contained in the `Finset` of primes below `n` -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers_iff_primeFactors_subset {m n : ℕ} :
m ∈ n.smoothNumbers ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ m.primeFactors ⊆ n.primesBelow :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, primeFactors_subset_of_mem_smoothNumbers h⟩,
fun h ↦ mem_smoothNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset h.1 <| h.2.trans <| Finset.filter_subset ..⟩
/-- Zero is never a smooth number -/
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_smoothNumbers {n m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ smoothNumbers n) : m ≠ 0 := h.1
@[simp]
lemma smoothNumbers_zero : smoothNumbers 0 = {1} := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, Finset.range_zero, factoredNumbers_empty]
/-- The product of two `n`-smooth numbers is an `n`-smooth number. -/
theorem mul_mem_smoothNumbers {m₁ m₂ n : ℕ}
(hm1 : m₁ ∈ n.smoothNumbers) (hm2 : m₂ ∈ n.smoothNumbers) : m₁ * m₂ ∈ n.smoothNumbers := by
rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers] at hm1 hm2 ⊢
exact mul_mem_factoredNumbers hm1 hm2
/-- The product of the prime factors of `n` that are less than `N` is an `N`-smooth number. -/
lemma prod_mem_smoothNumbers (n N : ℕ) :
(n.primeFactorsList.filter (· < N)).prod ∈ smoothNumbers N := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, ← Finset.mem_range, prod_mem_factoredNumbers]
/-- The sets of `N`-smooth and of `(N+1)`-smooth numbers are the same when `N` is not prime.
See `Nat.equivProdNatSmoothNumbers` for when `N` is prime. -/
lemma smoothNumbers_succ {N : ℕ} (hN : ¬ N.Prime) : (N + 1).smoothNumbers = N.smoothNumbers := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, Finset.range_succ, factoredNumbers_insert _ hN]
@[simp] lemma smoothNumbers_one : smoothNumbers 1 = {1} := by
simp +decide only [not_false_eq_true, smoothNumbers_succ, smoothNumbers_zero]
@[gcongr] lemma smoothNumbers_mono {N M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M) : N.smoothNumbers ⊆ M.smoothNumbers :=
fun _ hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, fun p hp => (hx.2 p hp).trans_le hNM⟩
/-- All `m`, `0 < m < n` are `n`-smooth numbers -/
lemma mem_smoothNumbers_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) (hmn : m < n) : m ∈ n.smoothNumbers :=
smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers _ ▸ ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hm,
fun _ h => Finset.mem_range.mpr <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_mem_primeFactorsList h) hmn⟩
/-- The non-zero non-`N`-smooth numbers are `≥ N`. -/
lemma smoothNumbers_compl (N : ℕ) : (N.smoothNumbers)ᶜ \ {0} ⊆ {n | N ≤ n} := by
simpa only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers]
using factoredNumbers_compl <| Finset.filter_subset _ (Finset.range N)
/-- If `p` is positive and `n` is `p`-smooth, then every product `p^e * n` is `(p+1)`-smooth. -/
lemma pow_mul_mem_smoothNumbers {p n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) (e : ℕ) (hn : n ∈ smoothNumbers p) :
p ^ e * n ∈ smoothNumbers (succ p) := by
-- This cannot be easily reduced to `pow_mul_mem_factoredNumbers`, as there `p.Prime` is needed.
have : NoZeroDivisors ℕ := inferInstance -- this is needed twice --> speed-up
have hp' := pow_ne_zero e hp
refine ⟨mul_ne_zero hp' hn.1, fun q hq ↦ ?_⟩
rcases (mem_primeFactorsList_mul hp' hn.1).mp hq with H | H
· rw [mem_primeFactorsList hp'] at H
exact lt_succ.mpr <| le_of_dvd hp.bot_lt <| H.1.dvd_of_dvd_pow H.2
· exact (hn.2 q H).trans <| lt_succ_self p
/-- If `p` is a prime and `n` is `p`-smooth, then `p` and `n` are coprime. -/
lemma Prime.smoothNumbers_coprime {p n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hn : n ∈ smoothNumbers p) :
Nat.Coprime p n := by
simp only [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers] at hn
exact hp.factoredNumbers_coprime Finset.not_mem_range_self hn
/-- If `f : ℕ → F` is multiplicative on coprime arguments, `p` is a prime and `m` is `p`-smooth,
then `f (p^e * m) = f (p^e) * f m`. -/
lemma map_prime_pow_mul {F : Type*} [Mul F] {f : ℕ → F}
(hmul : ∀ {m n}, Nat.Coprime m n → f (m * n) = f m * f n) {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (e : ℕ)
{m : p.smoothNumbers} :
f (p ^ e * m) = f (p ^ e) * f m :=
hmul <| Coprime.pow_left _ <| hp.smoothNumbers_coprime <| Subtype.mem m
open List Perm Equiv in
/-- We establish the bijection from `ℕ × smoothNumbers p` to `smoothNumbers (p+1)`
given by `(e, n) ↦ p^e * n` when `p` is a prime. See `Nat.smoothNumbers_succ` for
when `p` is not prime. -/
def equivProdNatSmoothNumbers {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
ℕ × smoothNumbers p ≃ smoothNumbers (p + 1) :=
((prodCongrRight fun _ ↦ setCongr <| smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers p).trans <|
equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hp Finset.not_mem_range_self).trans <|
setCongr <| (smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers (p + 1)) ▸ Finset.range_succ ▸ rfl
@[simp]
lemma equivProdNatSmoothNumbers_apply {p e m : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hm : m ∈ p.smoothNumbers) :
equivProdNatSmoothNumbers hp (e, ⟨m, hm⟩) = p ^ e * m := rfl
@[simp]
lemma equivProdNatSmoothNumbers_apply' {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (x : ℕ × p.smoothNumbers) :
equivProdNatSmoothNumbers hp x = p ^ x.1 * x.2 := rfl
/-!
### Smooth and rough numbers up to a bound
We consider the sets of smooth and non-smooth ("rough") positive natural numbers `≤ N`
and prove bounds for their sizes.
-/
/-- The `k`-smooth numbers up to and including `N` as a `Finset` -/
def smoothNumbersUpTo (N k : ℕ) : Finset ℕ :=
{n ∈ Finset.range (N + 1) | n ∈ smoothNumbers k}
lemma mem_smoothNumbersUpTo {N k n : ℕ} :
n ∈ smoothNumbersUpTo N k ↔ n ≤ N ∧ n ∈ smoothNumbers k := by
simp [smoothNumbersUpTo, lt_succ]
/-- The positive non-`k`-smooth (so "`k`-rough") numbers up to and including `N` as a `Finset` -/
def roughNumbersUpTo (N k : ℕ) : Finset ℕ :=
{n ∈ Finset.range (N + 1) | n ≠ 0 ∧ n ∉ smoothNumbers k}
lemma smoothNumbersUpTo_card_add_roughNumbersUpTo_card (N k : ℕ) :
#(smoothNumbersUpTo N k) + #(roughNumbersUpTo N k) = N := by
rw [smoothNumbersUpTo, roughNumbersUpTo,
← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint <| Finset.disjoint_filter.mpr fun n _ hn₂ h ↦ h.2 hn₂,
Finset.filter_union_right]
suffices #{x ∈ Finset.range (N + 1) | x ≠ 0} = N by
have hn' (n) : n ∈ smoothNumbers k ∨ n ≠ 0 ∧ n ∉ smoothNumbers k ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
have : n ∈ smoothNumbers k → n ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mem_smoothNumbers
refine ⟨fun H ↦ Or.elim H this fun H ↦ H.1, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [ne_eq, H, not_false_eq_true, true_and, or_not]
rwa [Finset.filter_congr (s := Finset.range (succ N)) fun n _ ↦ hn' n]
rw [Finset.filter_ne', Finset.card_erase_of_mem <| Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr <| zero_le N]
simp only [Finset.card_range, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero]
/-- A `k`-smooth number can be written as a square times a product of distinct primes `< k`. -/
lemma eq_prod_primes_mul_sq_of_mem_smoothNumbers {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∈ smoothNumbers k) :
∃ s ∈ k.primesBelow.powerset, ∃ m, n = m ^ 2 * (s.prod id) := by
obtain ⟨l, m, H₁, H₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree n
have hl : l ∈ smoothNumbers k := mem_smoothNumbers_of_dvd h (Dvd.intro_left (m ^ 2) H₁)
refine ⟨l.primeFactorsList.toFinset, ?_, m, ?_⟩
· simp only [toFinset_factors, Finset.mem_powerset]
refine fun p hp ↦ mem_primesBelow.mpr ⟨?_, (mem_primeFactors.mp hp).1⟩
rw [mem_primeFactors] at hp
exact mem_smoothNumbers'.mp hl p hp.1 hp.2.1
rw [← H₁]
| congr
simp only [toFinset_factors]
exact (prod_primeFactors_of_squarefree H₂).symm
/-- The set of `k`-smooth numbers `≤ N` is contained in the set of numbers of the form `m^2 * P`,
where `m ≤ √N` and `P` is a product of distinct primes `< k`. -/
lemma smoothNumbersUpTo_subset_image (N k : ℕ) :
smoothNumbersUpTo N k ⊆ Finset.image (fun (s, m) ↦ m ^ 2 * (s.prod id))
(k.primesBelow.powerset ×ˢ (Finset.range (N.sqrt + 1)).erase 0) := by
intro n hn
obtain ⟨hn₁, hn₂⟩ := mem_smoothNumbersUpTo.mp hn
obtain ⟨s, hs, m, hm⟩ := eq_prod_primes_mul_sq_of_mem_smoothNumbers hn₂
simp only [id_eq, Finset.mem_range, zero_lt_succ, not_true_eq_false, Finset.mem_image,
Finset.mem_product, Finset.mem_powerset, Finset.mem_erase, Prod.exists]
refine ⟨s, m, ⟨Finset.mem_powerset.mp hs, ?_, ?_⟩, hm.symm⟩
· have := hm ▸ ne_zero_of_mem_smoothNumbers hn₂
simp only [ne_eq, _root_.mul_eq_zero, sq_eq_zero_iff, not_or] at this
exact this.1
· rw [lt_succ, le_sqrt']
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SmoothNumbers.lean | 458 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
/-!
# W types
Given `α : Type` and `β : α → Type`, the W type determined by this data, `WType β`, is the
inductively defined type of trees where the nodes are labeled by elements of `α` and the children of
a node labeled `a` are indexed by elements of `β a`.
This file is currently a stub, awaiting a full development of the theory. Currently, the main result
is that if `α` is an encodable fintype and `β a` is encodable for every `a : α`, then `WType β` is
encodable. This can be used to show the encodability of other inductive types, such as those that
are commonly used to formalize syntax, e.g. terms and expressions in a given language. The strategy
is illustrated in the example found in the file `prop_encodable` in the `archive/examples` folder of
mathlib.
## Implementation details
While the name `WType` is somewhat verbose, it is preferable to putting a single character
identifier `W` in the root namespace.
-/
-- For "W_type"
/--
Given `β : α → Type*`, `WType β` is the type of finitely branching trees where nodes are labeled by
elements of `α` and the children of a node labeled `a` are indexed by elements of `β a`.
-/
inductive WType {α : Type*} (β : α → Type*)
| mk (a : α) (f : β a → WType β) : WType β
instance : Inhabited (WType fun _ : Unit => Empty) :=
⟨WType.mk Unit.unit Empty.elim⟩
namespace WType
variable {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
/-- The canonical map to the corresponding sigma type, returning the label of a node as an
element `a` of `α`, and the children of the node as a function `β a → WType β`. -/
def toSigma : WType β → Σa : α, β a → WType β
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
/-- The canonical map from the sigma type into a `WType`. Given a node `a : α`, and
its children as a function `β a → WType β`, return the corresponding tree. -/
def ofSigma : (Σa : α, β a → WType β) → WType β
| ⟨a, f⟩ => WType.mk a f
@[simp]
theorem ofSigma_toSigma : ∀ w : WType β, ofSigma (toSigma w) = w
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSigma_ofSigma : ∀ s : Σa : α, β a → WType β, toSigma (ofSigma s) = s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
variable (β) in
/-- The canonical bijection with the sigma type, showing that `WType` is a fixed point of
the polynomial functor `X ↦ Σ a : α, β a → X`. -/
@[simps]
def equivSigma : WType β ≃ Σa : α, β a → WType β where
toFun := toSigma
invFun := ofSigma
left_inv := ofSigma_toSigma
right_inv := toSigma_ofSigma
/-- The canonical map from `WType β` into any type `γ` given a map `(Σ a : α, β a → γ) → γ`. -/
def elim (γ : Type*) (fγ : (Σ a : α, β a → γ) → γ) : WType β → γ
| ⟨a, f⟩ => fγ ⟨a, fun b => elim γ fγ (f b)⟩
theorem elim_injective (γ : Type*) (fγ : (Σ a : α, β a → γ) → γ)
(fγ_injective : Function.Injective fγ) : Function.Injective (elim γ fγ)
| ⟨a₁, f₁⟩, ⟨a₂, f₂⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨rfl, h⟩ := Sigma.mk.inj_iff.mp (fγ_injective h)
congr with x
exact elim_injective γ fγ fγ_injective (congr_fun (eq_of_heq h) x :)
instance [hα : IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (WType β) :=
⟨fun w => WType.recOn w (IsEmpty.elim hα)⟩
theorem infinite_of_nonempty_of_isEmpty (a b : α) [ha : Nonempty (β a)] [he : IsEmpty (β b)] :
Infinite (WType β) :=
⟨by
intro hf
have hba : b ≠ a := fun h => ha.elim (IsEmpty.elim' (show IsEmpty (β a) from h ▸ he))
refine
not_injective_infinite_finite
(fun n : ℕ =>
show WType β from Nat.recOn n ⟨b, IsEmpty.elim' he⟩ fun _ ih => ⟨a, fun _ => ih⟩)
?_
intro n m h
induction' n with n ih generalizing m
· rcases m with - | m <;> simp_all
· rcases m with - | m
· simp_all
· refine congr_arg Nat.succ (ih ?_)
| simp_all [funext_iff]⟩
variable [∀ a : α, Fintype (β a)]
/-- The depth of a finitely branching tree. -/
def depth : WType β → ℕ
| ⟨_, f⟩ => (Finset.sup Finset.univ fun n => depth (f n)) + 1
theorem depth_pos (t : WType β) : 0 < t.depth := by
cases t
apply Nat.succ_pos
theorem depth_lt_depth_mk (a : α) (f : β a → WType β) (i : β a) : depth (f i) < depth ⟨a, f⟩ :=
Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Finset.le_sup (f := (depth <| f ·)) (Finset.mem_univ i))
/-
Show that W types are encodable when `α` is an encodable fintype and for every `a : α`, `β a` is
| Mathlib/Data/W/Basic.lean | 103 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Neighborhoods to the left and to the right on an `OrderTopology`
We've seen some properties of left and right neighborhood of a point in an `OrderClosedTopology`.
In an `OrderTopology`, such neighborhoods can be characterized as the sets containing suitable
intervals to the right or to the left of `a`. We give now these characterizations. -/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
section OrderTopology
variable [OrderTopology α]
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`;
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`;
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`;
3. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`;
4. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a`.
-/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsGT {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[>] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] a,
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ioo a u ⊆ s,
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun ⟨u, umem, hu⟩ => ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩
tfae_have 5 → 1
| ⟨u, hau, hu⟩ => mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hau) hu
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, au, fun x hx => hv ⟨hu ⟨le_of_lt hx.1, hx.2⟩, hx.1⟩⟩
tfae_finish
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := TFAE_mem_nhdsGT
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioc a u', Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 3
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 4
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset'
theorem nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt {a : α} (h : ∃ b, a < b) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis' := nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt
lemma nhdsGT_basis [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt <| exists_gt a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis := nhdsGT_basis
theorem nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff {a : α} : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ ↔ IsTop a ∨ ∃ b, a ⋖ b := by
by_cases ha : IsTop a
· simp [ha, ha.isMax.Ioi_eq]
· simp only [ha, false_or]
rw [isTop_iff_isMax, not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp only [(nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt ha).eq_bot_iff, covBy_iff_Ioo_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_eq_bot_iff := nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_u', hu'⟩ := exists_gt a
mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hu'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the right is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_right [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[>] x = ⊥ }.Countable := by
simp only [nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff, setOf_or]
exact (subsingleton_isTop α).countable.union countable_setOf_covBy_right
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the left is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_left [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[<] x = ⊥ }.Countable :=
countable_setOf_isolated_right (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioc a u ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
rcases exists_between au with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, hv.1, fun x hx => as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
exact ⟨u, au, Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self as⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b` -/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsLT {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[<] b,-- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] b,-- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] b,-- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioo l b ⊆ s,-- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioo l b ⊆ s] := by-- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b`
simpa using TFAE_mem_nhdsGT h.dual (ofDual ⁻¹' s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := TFAE_mem_nhdsLT
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLT hl' s).out 0 3
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLT hl' s).out 0 4
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_lt a
mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ico_subset [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ico l a ⊆ s := by
have : ofDual ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[>] toDual a ↔ _ := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
simpa using this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ico_subset
theorem nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt {a : α} (h : ∃ b, b < a) : (𝓝[<] a).HasBasis (· < a) (Ioo · a) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_basis' := nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt
theorem nhdsLT_basis [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[<] a).HasBasis (· < a) (Ioo · a) :=
nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt <| exists_lt a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_basis := nhdsLT_basis
theorem nhdsLT_eq_bot_iff {a : α} : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ ↔ IsBot a ∨ ∃ b, b ⋖ a := by
convert (config := { preTransparency := .default }) nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff (a := OrderDual.toDual a)
using 4
exact ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_eq_bot_iff := nhdsLT_eq_bot_iff
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)`;
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b]`;
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b)`;
3. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`;
4. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u > a`.
-/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsGE {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] a,
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ico a u ⊆ s,
∃ u ∈ Ioi a , Ico a u ⊆ s] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 5 := (nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt ⟨b, hab⟩).mem_iff
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun ⟨u, umem, hu⟩ => ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩
tfae_have 5 → 4
| ⟨u, hua, hus⟩ => ⟨min u b, ⟨lt_min hua hab, min_le_right _ _⟩,
(Ico_subset_Ico_right <| min_le_left _ _).trans hus⟩
tfae_finish
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := TFAE_mem_nhdsGE
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioc a u', Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGE hu' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset' {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGE hu' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_, hu'⟩ := exists_gt a
mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset' hu'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset
theorem nhdsGE_basis_Ico [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) (Ico a) :=
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis_Ico := nhdsGE_basis_Ico
/-- The filter of right neighborhoods has a basis of closed intervals. -/
theorem nhdsGE_basis_Icc [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} :
(𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Icc a) :=
(nhdsGE_basis _).to_hasBasis
(fun _u hu ↦ (exists_between hu).imp fun _v hv ↦ hv.imp_right Icc_subset_Ico_right) fun u hu ↦
⟨u, hu, Ico_subset_Icc_self⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis_Icc := nhdsGE_basis_Icc
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Icc_subset [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u, a < u ∧ Icc a u ⊆ s :=
nhdsGE_basis_Icc.mem_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Icc_subset
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
3. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b` -/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsLE {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[≤] b,-- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] b,-- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] b,-- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioc l b ⊆ s,-- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioc l b ⊆ s] := by-- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b`
simpa using TFAE_mem_nhdsGE h.dual (ofDual ⁻¹' s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := TFAE_mem_nhdsLE
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLE hl' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLE hl' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
| alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightNhds.lean | 330 | 332 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we prove various lemmas about upper/lower bounds of a set:
monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`,
and provide formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {γ : Type v}
section
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
theorem isLUB_congr (h : upperBounds s = upperBounds t) : IsLUB s a ↔ IsLUB t a := by
rw [IsLUB, IsLUB, h]
theorem isGLB_congr (h : lowerBounds s = lowerBounds t) : IsGLB s a ↔ IsGLB t a := by
rw [IsGLB, IsGLB, h]
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i | hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense hy⟩
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
@[simp] theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
@[simp] theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
@[simp] theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ | h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
@[simp]
theorem NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoTopOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
not_isTop b fun x => hb (mem_univ x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ := NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoBotOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ := NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoTopOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoBotOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoBotOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_isBot a fun _ => hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoTopOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddAbove.insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddAbove s → BddAbove (insert a s) :=
bddAbove_insert.2
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddBelow (insert a s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddBelow_union, bddBelow_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddBelow.insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddBelow s → BddBelow (insert a s) :=
bddBelow_insert.2
protected theorem IsLUB.insert [SemilatticeSup γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLUB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGLB.insert [SemilatticeInf γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGLB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGreatest.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGreatest s b) :
IsGreatest (insert a s) (max a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGreatest_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsLeast.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLeast s b) :
IsLeast (insert a s) (min a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLeast_singleton.union hs
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
upperBounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upperBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, upperBounds_union, upperBounds_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
lowerBounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lowerBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, lowerBounds_union, lowerBounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderTop.bddAbove [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : BddAbove s :=
⟨⊤, fun a _ => OrderTop.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderBot.bddBelow [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : BddBelow s :=
⟨⊥, fun a _ => OrderBot.bot_le a⟩
/-- Sets are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `bddDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hA : BddAbove A := by bddDefault)`. -/
macro "bddDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply OrderTop.bddAbove
| apply OrderBot.bddBelow)
/-!
#### Pair
-/
theorem isLUB_pair [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} : IsLUB {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
isLUB_singleton.insert _
theorem isGLB_pair [SemilatticeInf γ] {a b : γ} : IsGLB {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
isGLB_singleton.insert _
theorem isLeast_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsLeast {a, b} (min a b) :=
isLeast_singleton.insert _
theorem isGreatest_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsGreatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
isGreatest_singleton.insert _
/-!
#### Lower/upper bounds
-/
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_lowerBounds : IsLUB (lowerBounds s) a ↔ IsGLB s a :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ hx => H.2 <| subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s hx, H.1⟩, IsGreatest.isLUB⟩
@[simp]
theorem isGLB_upperBounds : IsGLB (upperBounds s) a ↔ IsLUB s a :=
@isLUB_lowerBounds αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lowerBounds_le_upperBounds (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) :
s.Nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨_, hc⟩ => le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
theorem isGLB_le_isLUB (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lowerBounds_le_upperBounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
theorem isLUB_lt_iff (ha : IsLUB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upperBounds s, c < b :=
⟨fun hb => ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, fun ⟨_, hcs, hcb⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
theorem lt_isGLB_iff (ha : IsGLB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lowerBounds s, b < c :=
isLUB_lt_iff ha.dual
theorem le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB {x y} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ b := hb.1 hx
_ ≤ a := hab
_ ≤ y := ha.1 hy
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem IsLeast.unique (Ha : IsLeast s a) (Hb : IsLeast s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
theorem IsLeast.isLeast_iff_eq (Ha : IsLeast s a) : IsLeast s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsGreatest.unique (Ha : IsGreatest s a) (Hb : IsGreatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
theorem IsGreatest.isGreatest_iff_eq (Ha : IsGreatest s a) : IsGreatest s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsLUB.unique (Ha : IsLUB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) : a = b :=
IsLeast.unique Ha Hb
theorem IsGLB.unique (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsGLB s b) : a = b :=
IsGreatest.unique Ha Hb
theorem Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
le_antisymm (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hx hy) (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hy hx)
theorem isGLB_lt_isLUB_of_ne (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) {x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s)
(Hxy : x ≠ y) : a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lowerBounds_le_upperBounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩, fun hab =>
Hxy <| Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_isLUB_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c := by
simp_rw [← not_le, isLUB_le_iff h, mem_upperBounds, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem isGLB_lt_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff h.dual
theorem IsLUB.exists_between (h : IsLUB s a) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
theorem IsLUB.exists_between' (h : IsLUB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac ▸ hcs⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between (h : IsGLB s a) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between' (h : IsGLB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end LinearOrder
theorem isGreatest_himp [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsGreatest {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} (a ⇨ b) := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds]
theorem isLeast_sdiff [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsLeast {w | a ≤ b ⊔ w} (a \ b) := by
simp [IsLeast, mem_lowerBounds]
theorem isGreatest_compl [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsGreatest {w | Disjoint w a} (aᶜ) := by
simpa only [himp_bot, disjoint_iff_inf_le] using isGreatest_himp a ⊥
theorem isLeast_hnot [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsLeast {w | Codisjoint a w} (￢a) := by
simpa only [CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup] using isLeast_sdiff ⊤ a
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 1,451 | 1,454 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Fold
/-!
# Big operators on a multiset in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of multiset big operators with ordered
groups.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → 1 ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl => by simpa using List.one_le_prod_of_one_le hl
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl x hx => by simpa using List.single_le_prod hl x hx
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_le_pow_card (s : Multiset α) (n : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ n) : s.prod ≤ n ^ card s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simpa using List.prod_le_pow_card _ _ h
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one :
(∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → s.prod = 1 → ∀ x ∈ s, x = (1 : α) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, prod_coe, mem_coe]
exact fun l => List.all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_le_prod_of_rel_le (h : s.Rel (· ≤ ·) t) : s.prod ≤ t.prod := by
induction h with
| zero => rfl
| cons rh _ rt =>
rw [prod_cons, prod_cons]
exact mul_le_mul' rh rt
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_le_prod_map {s : Multiset ι} (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ≤ g i) :
(s.map f).prod ≤ (s.map g).prod :=
prod_le_prod_of_rel_le <| rel_map.2 <| rel_refl_of_refl_on h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_le_prod (f : α → α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≤ x) : (s.map f).prod ≤ s.prod :=
prod_le_prod_of_rel_le <| rel_map_left.2 <| rel_refl_of_refl_on h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_le_prod_map (f : α → α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ≤ f x) : s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
prod_map_le_prod (α := αᵒᵈ) f h
@[to_additive card_nsmul_le_sum]
lemma pow_card_le_prod (h : ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x) : a ^ card s ≤ s.prod := by
rw [← Multiset.prod_replicate, ← Multiset.map_const]
exact prod_map_le_prod _ h
end OrderedCommMonoid
section
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β]
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred]
lemma le_prod_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : α → β)
(p : α → Prop) (h_one : f 1 = 1) (hp_one : p 1)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (hp_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b))
(s : Multiset α) (hps : ∀ a, a ∈ s → p a) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod := by
revert s
refine Multiset.induction ?_ ?_
· simp [le_of_eq h_one]
intro a s hs hpsa
have hps : ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := fun x hx => hpsa x (mem_cons_of_mem hx)
have hp_prod : p s.prod := prod_induction p s hp_mul hp_one hps
rw [prod_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
exact (h_mul a s.prod (hpsa a (mem_cons_self a s)) hp_prod).trans (mul_le_mul_left' (hs hps) _)
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive]
lemma le_prod_of_submultiplicative (f : α → β) (h_one : f 1 = 1)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (s : Multiset α) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
le_prod_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f (fun _ => True) h_one trivial (fun x y _ _ => h_mul x y)
(by simp) s (by simp)
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive_on_pred]
lemma le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (hp_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b))
(s : Multiset α) (hs_nonempty : s ≠ ∅) (hs : ∀ a, a ∈ s → p a) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod := by
revert s
refine Multiset.induction ?_ ?_
· simp
rintro a s hs - hsa_prop
rw [prod_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
by_cases hs_empty : s = ∅
· simp [hs_empty]
have hsa_restrict : ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := fun x hx => hsa_prop x (mem_cons_of_mem hx)
have hp_sup : p s.prod := prod_induction_nonempty p hp_mul hs_empty hsa_restrict
have hp_a : p a := hsa_prop a (mem_cons_self a s)
exact (h_mul a _ hp_a hp_sup).trans (mul_le_mul_left' (hs hs_empty hsa_restrict) _)
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive]
lemma le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative (f : α → β) (h_mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b)
(s : Multiset α) (hs_nonempty : s ≠ ∅) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f (fun _ => True) (by simp [h_mul]) (by simp) s
hs_nonempty (by simp)
end
section OrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α] {s : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α}
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum]
lemma prod_lt_prod' (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) (hlt : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
(s.map f).prod < (s.map g).prod := by
obtain ⟨l⟩ := s
simp only [Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'', Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
exact List.prod_lt_prod' f g hle hlt
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty]
lemma prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' (hs : s ≠ ∅) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
(s.map f).prod < (s.map g).prod := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_zero hs
exact prod_lt_prod' (fun i hi => le_of_lt (hfg i hi)) ⟨i, hi, hfg i hi⟩
end OrderedCancelCommMonoid
section CanonicallyOrderedMul
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedMul α] {m : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive] lemma prod_eq_one_iff [IsOrderedMonoid α] : m.prod = 1 ↔ ∀ x ∈ m, x = (1 : α) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun l ↦ by simpa using List.prod_eq_one_iff
@[to_additive] lemma le_prod_of_mem (ha : a ∈ m) : a ≤ m.prod := by
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem ha
rw [prod_cons]
exact _root_.le_mul_right (le_refl a)
end CanonicallyOrderedMul
lemma max_le_of_forall_le {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] (l : Multiset α)
(n : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ n) : l.fold max ⊥ ≤ n := by
induction l using Quotient.inductionOn
simpa using List.max_le_of_forall_le _ _ h
@[to_additive]
lemma max_prod_le [CommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
{s : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α} :
max (s.map f).prod (s.map g).prod ≤ (s.map fun i ↦ max (f i) (g i)).prod := by
obtain ⟨l⟩ := s
simp_rw [Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'', Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
apply List.max_prod_le
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_min_le [CommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
{s : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α} :
(s.map fun i ↦ min (f i) (g i)).prod ≤ min (s.map f).prod (s.map g).prod := by
obtain ⟨l⟩ := s
simp_rw [Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'', Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
apply List.prod_min_le
lemma abs_sum_le_sum_abs [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] {s : Multiset α} :
|s.sum| ≤ (s.map abs).sum :=
le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/Multiset.lean | 182 | 185 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, comp_neg]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : R) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul]
@[simp]
lemma comp_units_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : Rˣ) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.comp_smul
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_id {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) :
z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G)) (add_zero n) = z₁ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_zero_cochain_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_comp (φ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), G.X p ⟶ K.X p) :
(ofHoms φ).comp (ofHoms ψ) (zero_add 0) = ofHoms (fun p => φ p ≫ ψ p) := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_comp (f : F ⟶ G) (g : G ⟶ K) :
ofHom (f ≫ g) = (ofHom f).comp (ofHom g) (zero_add 0) := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.comp_f, ofHoms_comp]
variable (K)
/-- The differential on a cochain complex, as a cochain of degree `1`. -/
def diff : Cochain K K 1 := Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => K.d p q)
@[simp]
lemma diff_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) : (diff K).v p q hpq = K.d p q := rfl
end Cochain
variable {F G}
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes. -/
def δ (z : Cochain F G n) : Cochain F G m :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z.v p (p + n) rfl ≫ G.d (p + n) q +
m.negOnePow • F.d p (p + m - n) ≫ z.v (p + m - n) q (by rw [hpq, sub_add_cancel]))
/-! Similarly as for the composition of cochains, if `z : Cochain F G n`,
we usually need to carefully select intermediate indices with
good definitional properties in order to obtain a suitable expansion of the
morphisms which constitute `δ n m z : Cochain F G m` (when `n + 1 = m`, otherwise
it shall be zero). The basic equational lemma is `δ_v` below. -/
lemma δ_v (hnm : n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + m = q) (q₁ q₂ : ℤ)
(hq₁ : q₁ = q - 1) (hq₂ : p + 1 = q₂) : (δ n m z).v p q hpq =
z.v p q₁ (by rw [hq₁, ← hpq, ← hnm, ← add_assoc, add_sub_cancel_right]) ≫ G.d q₁ q
+ m.negOnePow • F.d p q₂ ≫ z.v q₂ q
(by rw [← hq₂, add_assoc, add_comm 1, hnm, hpq]) := by
obtain rfl : q₁ = p + n := by omega
obtain rfl : q₂ = p + m - n := by omega
rfl
lemma δ_shape (hnm : ¬ n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m z = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp only [δ]
rw [Cochain.mk_v, Cochain.zero_v, F.shape, G.shape, comp_zero, zero_add, zero_comp, smul_zero]
all_goals
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel]
exact fun _ => hnm (by omega)
variable (F G) (R)
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes, as a linear map. -/
@[simps!]
def δ_hom : Cochain F G n →ₗ[R] Cochain F G m where
toFun := δ n m
map_add' α β := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.add_v, add_comp, comp_add, smul_add]
abel
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, add_zero]
map_smul' r a := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.smul_v, Linear.comp_smul,
Linear.smul_comp, smul_add, add_right_inj, smul_comm m.negOnePow r]
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, smul_zero]
variable {F G R}
@[simp] lemma δ_add (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ + z₂) = δ n m z₁ + δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_add z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_sub (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ - z₂) = δ n m z₁ - δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_sub z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_zero : δ n m (0 : Cochain F G n) = 0 := (δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_zero
@[simp] lemma δ_neg (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (-z) = - δ n m z :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_neg z
@[simp] lemma δ_smul (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
(δ_hom R F G n m).map_smul k z
@[simp] lemma δ_units_smul (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
δ_smul ..
lemma δ_δ (n₀ n₁ n₂ : ℤ) (z : Cochain F G n₀) : δ n₁ n₂ (δ n₀ n₁ z) = 0 := by
by_cases h₁₂ : n₁ + 1 = n₂; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₁₂]
by_cases h₀₁ : n₀ + 1 = n₁; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₀₁, δ_zero]
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n₁ n₂ h₁₂ _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z p (q-1) (by omega) (q-2) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z (p+1) q (by omega) _ (p+2) rfl (by omega),
← h₁₂, Int.negOnePow_succ, add_comp, assoc,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, comp_zero, zero_add, comp_add,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero,
add_zero, add_neg_cancel, Units.neg_smul,
| Linear.units_smul_comp, Linear.comp_units_smul]
lemma δ_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(m₁ m₂ m₁₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : n₁₂ + 1 = m₁₂) (h₁ : n₁ + 1 = m₁) (h₂ : n₂ + 1 = m₂) :
δ n₁₂ m₁₂ (z₁.comp z₂ h) = z₁.comp (δ n₂ m₂ z₂) (by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₂, ← h, add_assoc]) +
n₂.negOnePow • (δ n₁ m₁ z₁).comp z₂
(by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc]) := by
subst h₁₂ h₁ h₂ h
ext p q hpq
dsimp
rw [z₁.comp_v _ (add_assoc n₁ n₂ 1).symm p _ q rfl (by omega),
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show n₁ + 1 + n₂ = n₁ + n₂ + 1 by omega) p (p+n₁+1) q
(by omega) (by omega),
δ_v (n₁ + n₂) _ rfl (z₁.comp z₂ rfl) p q hpq (p + n₁ + n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl p _ _ rfl rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl (p+1) (p+n₁+1) q (by omega) (by omega),
δ_v n₂ (n₂+1) rfl z₂ (p+n₁) q (by omega) (p+n₁+n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₁ (n₁+1) rfl z₁ p (p+n₁+1) (by omega) (p+n₁) _ (by omega) rfl]
simp only [assoc, comp_add, add_comp, Int.negOnePow_succ, Int.negOnePow_add n₁ n₂,
Units.neg_smul, comp_neg, neg_comp, smul_neg, smul_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 484 | 503 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : g • a ≤ a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (pow_smul_le h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm h key
end FiniteGroup
section PowIsSubgroup
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative monoid is a submonoid -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative add monoid is a submonoid"]
def submonoidOfIdempotent {M : Type*} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [Finite M] (S : Set M)
(hS1 : S.Nonempty) (hS2 : S * S = S) : Submonoid M :=
have pow_mem (a : M) (ha : a ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) ∈ S := by
induction n with
| zero => rwa [zero_add, pow_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [← hS2, pow_succ]
exact Set.mul_mem_mul ih ha
{ carrier := S
one_mem' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS1
rw [← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt (orderOf_pos a))]
exact pow_mem a ha (orderOf a - 1)
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => (congr_arg₂ (· ∈ ·) rfl hS2).mp (Set.mul_mem_mul ha hb) }
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite group is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite add group is a subgroup"]
def subgroupOfIdempotent {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (S : Set G) (hS1 : S.Nonempty)
(hS2 : S * S = S) : Subgroup G :=
{ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 with
carrier := S
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show a⁻¹ ∈ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 by
rw [← one_mul a⁻¹, ← pow_one a, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← pow_sub a (orderOf_pos a)]
exact pow_mem ha (orderOf a - 1) }
/-- If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite group `G`, then `S ^ |G|` is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) smulCardAddSubgroup
"If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite add group `G`, then `|G| • S` is a subgroup"]
def powCardSubgroup {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (S : Set G) (hS : S.Nonempty) : Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ S ^ Fintype.card G := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS
rw [← pow_card_eq_one]
exact Set.pow_mem_pow ha
subgroupOfIdempotent (S ^ Fintype.card G) ⟨1, one_mem⟩ <| by
classical
apply (Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_mul_left _ one_mem) (ge_of_eq _)).symm
simp_rw [← pow_add,
Group.card_pow_eq_card_pow_card_univ S (Fintype.card G + Fintype.card G) le_add_self]
end PowIsSubgroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_one (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, ha⟩ := ha.exists_pow_eq_one
exact (pow_eq_one_iff_of_nonneg ha₀ hn.ne').1 ha
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a x : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_neg_one (ha₀ : a ≤ 0) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = -1 :=
(sq_eq_one_iff.1 <| ha.pow.eq_one <| sq_nonneg a).resolve_left <| by
rintro rfl; exact one_pos.not_le ha₀
theorem orderOf_abs_ne_one (h : |x| ≠ 1) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
intro n hn hx
replace hx : |x| ^ n = 1 := by simpa only [abs_one, abs_pow] using congr_arg abs hx
rcases h.lt_or_lt with h | h
· exact ((pow_lt_one₀ (abs_nonneg x) h hn.ne').ne hx).elim
· exact ((one_lt_pow₀ h hn.ne').ne' hx).elim
theorem LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two : orderOf x ≤ 2 := by
rcases ne_or_eq |x| 1 with h | h
· simp [orderOf_abs_ne_one h]
rcases eq_or_eq_neg_of_abs_eq h with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
exact orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one zero_lt_two (by simp)
end LinearOrderedRing
section Prod
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {x : α × β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[to_additive]
| protected theorem Prod.orderOf (x : α × β) : orderOf x = (orderOf x.1).lcm (orderOf x.2) :=
minimalPeriod_prodMap _ _ _
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 1,089 | 1,091 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
/-!
# L-series
Given a sequence `f: ℕ → ℂ`, we define the corresponding L-series.
## Main Definitions
* `LSeries.term f s n` is the `n`th term of the L-series of the sequence `f` at `s : ℂ`.
We define it to be zero when `n = 0`.
* `LSeries f` is the L-series with a given sequence `f` as its
coefficients. This is not the analytic continuation (which does not necessarily exist),
just the sum of the infinite series if it exists and zero otherwise.
* `LSeriesSummable f s` indicates that the L-series of `f` converges at `s : ℂ`.
* `LSeriesHasSum f s a` expresses that the L-series of `f` converges (absolutely)
at `s : ℂ` to `a : ℂ`.
## Main Results
* `LSeriesSummable_of_isBigO_rpow`: the `LSeries` of a sequence `f` such that
`f = O(n^(x-1))` converges at `s` when `x < s.re`.
* `LSeriesSummable.isBigO_rpow`: if the `LSeries` of `f` is summable at `s`,
then `f = O(n^(re s))`.
## Notation
We introduce `L` as notation for `LSeries` and `↗f` as notation for `fun n : ℕ ↦ (f n : ℂ)`,
both scoped to `LSeries.notation`. The latter makes it convenient to use arithmetic functions
or Dirichlet characters (or anything that coerces to a function `N → R`, where `ℕ` coerces
to `N` and `R` coerces to `ℂ`) as arguments to `LSeries` etc.
## Reference
For some background on the design decisions made when implementing L-series in Mathlib
(and applications motivating the development), see the paper
[Formalizing zeta and L-functions in Lean](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00959)
by David Loeffler and Michael Stoll.
## Tags
L-series
-/
open Complex
/-!
### The terms of an L-series
We define the `n`th term evaluated at a complex number `s` of the L-series associated
to a sequence `f : ℕ → ℂ`, `LSeries.term f s n`, and provide some basic API.
We set `LSeries.term f s 0 = 0`, and for positive `n`, `LSeries.term f s n = f n / n ^ s`.
-/
namespace LSeries
/-- The `n`th term of the L-series of `f` evaluated at `s`. We set it to zero when `n = 0`. -/
noncomputable
def term (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : ℂ :=
if n = 0 then 0 else f n / n ^ s
lemma term_def (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term f s n = if n = 0 then 0 else f n / n ^ s :=
rfl
/-- An alternate spelling of `term_def` for the case `f 0 = 0`. -/
lemma term_def₀ {f : ℕ → ℂ} (hf : f 0 = 0) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
LSeries.term f s n = f n * (n : ℂ) ^ (- s) := by
rw [LSeries.term]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, hf, cpow_neg, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma term_zero (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term f s 0 = 0 := rfl
-- We put `hn` first for convnience, so that we can write `rw [LSeries.term_of_ne_zero hn]` etc.
@[simp]
lemma term_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) :
term f s n = f n / n ^ s :=
if_neg hn
/--
If `s ≠ 0`, then the `if .. then .. else` construction in `LSeries.term` isn't needed, since
`0 ^ s = 0`.
-/
lemma term_of_ne_zero' {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (f : ℕ → ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term f s n = f n / n ^ s := by
| rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· rw [term_zero, Nat.cast_zero, zero_cpow hs, div_zero]
· rw [term_of_ne_zero hn]
lemma term_congr {f g : ℕ → ℂ} (h : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → f n = g n) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term f s n = term g s n := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Basic.lean | 99 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# Lebesgue measure on the real line and on `ℝⁿ`
We show that the Lebesgue measure on the real line (constructed as a particular case of additive
Haar measure on inner product spaces) coincides with the Stieltjes measure associated
to the function `x ↦ x`. We deduce properties of this measure on `ℝ`, and then of the product
Lebesgue measure on `ℝⁿ`. In particular, we prove that they are translation invariant.
We show that, on `ℝⁿ`, a linear map acts on Lebesgue measure by rescaling it through the absolute
value of its determinant, in `Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`.
More properties of the Lebesgue measure are deduced from this in
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean`, where they are proved more generally for any
additive Haar measure on a finite-dimensional real vector space.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-!
### Definition of the Lebesgue measure and lengths of intervals
-/
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The volume on the real line (as a particular case of the volume on a finite-dimensional
inner product space) coincides with the Stieltjes measure coming from the identity function. -/
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ico a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ico_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ico a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Icc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Icc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Icc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioo a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioo_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioo a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_ball {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : volume.real (Metric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_closedBall {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume.real (Metric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [Metric.emetric_ball_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal, volume_ball, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_closedBall (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [EMetric.closedBall_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal, volume_closedBall, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
instance noAtoms_volume : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun _ => volume_singleton⟩
@[simp]
theorem volume_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume (uIcc a b) = ofReal |b - a| := by
rw [← Icc_min_max, volume_Icc, max_sub_min_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (uIcc a b) = |b - a| := by
simp [measureReal_def]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioi {a : ℝ} : volume (Ioi a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo a (a + n)) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Ioi a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ici {a : ℝ} : volume (Ici a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Ioi_ae_eq_Ici]; simp
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iio {a : ℝ} : volume (Iio a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo (a - n) a) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Iio a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iic {a : ℝ} : volume (Iic a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Iio_ae_eq_Iic]; simp
instance locallyFinite_volume : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun x =>
⟨Ioo (x - 1) (x + 1),
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one, lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one⟩, by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]⟩⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Icc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ico x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioo x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
theorem volume_le_diam (s : Set ℝ) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s := by
by_cases hs : Bornology.IsBounded s
· rw [Real.ediam_eq hs, ← volume_Icc]
exact volume.mono hs.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup
· rw [Metric.ediam_of_unbounded hs]; exact le_top
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real {p : ℝ → Prop} {a : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < volume { x | p x } := by
rcases h.exists_Ioo_subset with ⟨l, u, hx, hs⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hs)
simpa [-mem_Ioo] using hx.1.trans hx.2
/-!
### Volume of a box in `ℝⁿ`
-/
theorem volume_Icc_pi {a b : ι → ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, volume_pi_pi]
simp only [Real.volume_Icc]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc_pi_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (Icc a b)).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_Icc_pi, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioo, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ico {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ico_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ico, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_ball (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
volume (Metric.ball a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_ball a hr, volume_ball, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr.le) _).symm
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_closedBall (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_closedBall a hr, volume_closedBall, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr) _).symm
theorem volume_pi_le_prod_diam (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) :
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
calc
volume s ≤ volume (pi univ fun i => closure (Function.eval i '' s)) :=
volume.mono <|
Subset.trans (subset_pi_eval_image univ s) <| pi_mono fun _ _ => subset_closure
_ = ∏ i, volume (closure <| Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_pi _
_ ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => (volume_le_diam _).trans_eq (EMetric.diam_closure _)
theorem volume_pi_le_diam_pow (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι :=
calc
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_le_prod_diam s
_ ≤ ∏ _i : ι, (1 : ℝ≥0) * EMetric.diam s :=
(Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => (LipschitzWith.eval i).ediam_image_le s)
_ = EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι := by
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, Finset.prod_const, Fintype.card]
/-!
### Images of the Lebesgue measure under multiplication in ℝ
-/
theorem smul_map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal |a| • Measure.map (a * ·) volume = volume := by
refine (Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => ?_).symm
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt <| neg_pos.2 h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, neg_sub_neg, neg_mul,
preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg _ _ h, abs_of_neg h, mul_sub, smul_eq_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_lt h)]
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, preimage_const_mul_Ioo _ _ h,
abs_of_pos h, mul_sub, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt h), smul_eq_mul]
theorem map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (a * ·) volume = ENNReal.ofReal |a⁻¹| • volume := by
| conv_rhs =>
rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left h, smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ←
abs_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 308 | 312 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts.
Binary biproducts are defined in `CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts`.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
open scoped Classical in
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp] theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
@[simp] theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [simp] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
noncomputable def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`. -/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`. -/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasProductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasProductsOfShape J C where
has_limit _ := hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasCoproductsOfShape J C where
has_colimit _ := hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit. -/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
colimit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoCoproduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).hom = biproduct.desc (Sigma.ι f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => by simp [← Iso.eq_comp_inv]
/-- If a category has biproducts of a shape `J`, its `colim` and `lim` functor on diagrams over `J`
are isomorphic. -/
@[simps!]
def HasBiproductsOfShape.colimIsoLim [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
colim (J := Discrete J) (C := C) ≅ lim :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun F => (Sigma.isoColimit F).symm ≪≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).symm ≪≫ biproduct.isoProduct _ ≪≫ Pi.isoLimit F)
fun η => colimit.hom_ext fun ⟨i⟩ => limit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => by
classical
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp_all [h, Sigma.isoColimit, Pi.isoLimit, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc]
theorem biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p := by
classical
ext
dsimp
simp only [Discrete.natTrans_app, Limits.IsColimit.ι_map_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.map_π,
Category.assoc, ← Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk, ← biproduct.bicone_π, ← Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk,
← biproduct.bicone_ι]
dsimp
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_π {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.π g j = biproduct.π f j ≫ p j :=
Limits.IsLimit.map_π _ _ _ (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.map p = p j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
rw [biproduct.map_eq_map']
apply
Limits.IsColimit.ι_map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as) (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_desc {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
{P : C} (k : ∀ j, g j ⟶ P) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.desc k = biproduct.desc fun j => p j ≫ k j := by
ext; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] {P : C}
(k : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j) :
biproduct.lift k ≫ biproduct.map p = biproduct.lift fun j => k j ≫ p j := by
ext; simp
/-- Given a collection of isomorphisms between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain an isomorphism between the biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.mapIso {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) :
⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).hom
inv := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).inv
instance biproduct.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (biproduct.map p) := by
classical
have : biproduct.map p =
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom ≫ Sigma.map p ≫ (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv := by
ext
simp only [map_π, isoCoproduct_hom, isoCoproduct_inv, Category.assoc, ι_desc_assoc,
ι_colimMap_assoc, Discrete.functor_obj_eq_as, Discrete.natTrans_app, colimit.ι_desc_assoc,
Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app, ι_π, ι_π_assoc]
split
all_goals simp_all
rw [this]
infer_instance
instance Pi.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (Pi.map p) := by
rw [show Pi.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
instance biproduct.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (biproduct.map p) := by
rw [show biproduct.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).hom ≫ Pi.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).inv by aesop]
infer_instance
instance Sigma.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (Sigma.map p) := by
rw [show Sigma.map p = (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
/-- Two biproducts which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
Unfortunately there are two natural ways to define each direction of this isomorphism
(because it is true for both products and coproducts separately).
We give the alternative definitions as lemmas below. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.whiskerEquiv {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] : ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.desc fun j => (w j).inv ≫ biproduct.ι g (e j)
inv := biproduct.desc fun k => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (w (e.symm k)).hom ≫ biproduct.ι f _
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_hom_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).hom =
biproduct.lift fun k => biproduct.π f (e.symm k) ≫ (w _).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_hom]
ext k j
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· rintro rfl
simp at h
· exact Ne.symm h
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_inv_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).inv =
biproduct.lift fun j => biproduct.π g (e j) ≫ (w j).hom := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_inv]
| ext j k
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp only [ι_desc_assoc, ← eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality_assoc w (e.symm_apply_apply j).symm,
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 656 | 659 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
/-!
# Semidirect product
This file defines semidirect products of groups, and the canonical maps in and out of the
semidirect product. The semidirect product of `N` and `G` given a hom `φ` from
`G` to the automorphism group of `N` is the product of sets with the group
`⟨n₁, g₁⟩ * ⟨n₂, g₂⟩ = ⟨n₁ * φ g₁ n₂, g₁ * g₂⟩`
## Key definitions
There are two homs into the semidirect product `inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G` and
`inr : G →* N ⋊[φ] G`, and `lift` can be used to define maps `N ⋊[φ] G →* H`
out of the semidirect product given maps `fn : N →* H` and `fg : G →* H` that satisfy the
condition `∀ n g, fn (φ g n) = fg g * fn n * fg g⁻¹`
## Notation
This file introduces the global notation `N ⋊[φ] G` for `SemidirectProduct N G φ`
## Tags
group, semidirect product
-/
open Subgroup
variable (N : Type*) (G : Type*) {H : Type*} [Group N] [Group G] [Group H]
-- Don't generate sizeOf and injectivity lemmas, which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- The semidirect product of groups `N` and `G`, given a map `φ` from `G` to the automorphism
group of `N`. It the product of sets with the group operation
`⟨n₁, g₁⟩ * ⟨n₂, g₂⟩ = ⟨n₁ * φ g₁ n₂, g₁ * g₂⟩` -/
@[ext]
structure SemidirectProduct (φ : G →* MulAut N) where
/-- The element of N -/
left : N
/-- The element of G -/
right : G
deriving DecidableEq
-- Porting note: unknown attribute
-- attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] SemidirectProduct
@[inherit_doc]
notation:35 N " ⋊[" φ:35 "] " G:35 => SemidirectProduct N G φ
namespace SemidirectProduct
variable {N G}
variable {φ : G →* MulAut N}
instance : Mul (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
mul a b := ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩
lemma mul_def (a b : SemidirectProduct N G φ) : a * b = ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_left (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).left = a.left * φ a.right b.left := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_right (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).right = a.right * b.right := rfl
instance : One (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where one := ⟨1, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_left : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_right : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
instance : Inv (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
inv x := ⟨φ x.2⁻¹ x.1⁻¹, x.2⁻¹⟩
@[simp]
theorem inv_left (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.left = φ a.right⁻¹ a.left⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem inv_right (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.right = a.right⁻¹ := rfl
instance : Group (N ⋊[φ] G) where
mul_assoc a b c := SemidirectProduct.ext (by simp [mul_assoc]) (by simp [mul_assoc])
one_mul a := SemidirectProduct.ext (by simp) (one_mul a.2)
mul_one a := SemidirectProduct.ext (by simp) (mul_one _)
inv_mul_cancel a := SemidirectProduct.ext (by simp) (by simp)
instance : Inhabited (N ⋊[φ] G) := ⟨1⟩
/-- The canonical map `N →* N ⋊[φ] G` sending `n` to `⟨n, 1⟩` -/
def inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun n := ⟨n, 1⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;>
simp only [mul_left, map_one, MulAut.one_apply, mul_right, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem left_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).left = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem right_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl : N → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨left, left_inl⟩
@[simp]
theorem inl_inj {n₁ n₂ : N} : (inl n₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n₂ ↔ n₁ = n₂ :=
inl_injective.eq_iff
/-- The canonical map `G →* N ⋊[φ] G` sending `g` to `⟨1, g⟩` -/
def inr : G →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun g := ⟨1, g⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem left_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem right_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).right = g := rfl
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr : G → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨right, right_inr⟩
@[simp]
theorem inr_inj {g₁ g₂ : G} : (inr g₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g₂ ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
inr_injective.eq_iff
theorem inl_aut (g : G) (n : N) : (inl (φ g n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g * inl n * inr g⁻¹ := by
ext <;> simp
theorem inl_aut_inv (g : G) (n : N) : (inl ((φ g)⁻¹ n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g⁻¹ * inl n * inr g := by
rw [← MonoidHom.map_inv, inl_aut, inv_inv]
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_inl_mul_inr (g : G) (n : N) : (⟨n, g⟩ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n * inr g := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem inl_left_mul_inr_right (x : N ⋊[φ] G) : inl x.left * inr x.right = x := by ext <;> simp
/-- The canonical projection map `N ⋊[φ] G →* G`, as a group hom. -/
def rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G where
toFun := SemidirectProduct.right
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_eq_right : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) = right := rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inl : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inl = 1 := by ext; simp [rightHom]
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inr : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inr = MonoidHom.id _ := by
ext; simp [rightHom]
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inl (n : N) : rightHom (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G) = 1 := by simp [rightHom]
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inr (g : G) : rightHom (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G) = g := by simp [rightHom]
theorem rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) :=
Function.surjective_iff_hasRightInverse.2 ⟨inr, rightHom_inr⟩
theorem range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : (inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G).range = rightHom.ker :=
le_antisymm (fun _ ↦ by simp +contextual [MonoidHom.mem_ker, eq_comm])
fun x hx ↦ ⟨x.left, by ext <;> simp_all [MonoidHom.mem_ker]⟩
/-- The bijection between the semidirect product and the product. -/
@[simps]
def equivProd : N ⋊[φ] G ≃ N × G where
toFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The group isomorphism between a semidirect product with respect to the trivial map
and the product. -/
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := .default })]
def mulEquivProd : N ⋊[1] G ≃* N × G :=
{ equivProd with map_mul' _ _ := rfl }
section lift
variable (fn : N →* H) (fg : G →* H)
(h : ∀ g, fn.comp (φ g).toMonoidHom = (MulAut.conj (fg g)).toMonoidHom.comp fn)
/-- Define a group hom `N ⋊[φ] G →* H`, by defining maps `N →* H` and `G →* H` -/
def lift : N ⋊[φ] G →* H where
toFun a := fn a.1 * fg a.2
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' a b := by
have := fun n g ↦ DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (h n) g
simp only [MulAut.conj_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom] at this
simp only [mul_left, mul_right, map_mul, this, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem lift_inl (n : N) : lift fn fg h (inl n) = fn n := by simp [lift]
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_inl : (lift fn fg h).comp inl = fn := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_inr (g : G) : lift fn fg h (inr g) = fg g := by simp [lift]
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_inr : (lift fn fg h).comp inr = fg := by ext; simp
theorem lift_unique (F : N ⋊[φ] G →* H) :
F = lift (F.comp inl) (F.comp inr) fun _ ↦ by ext; simp [inl_aut] := by
rw [DFunLike.ext_iff]
simp only [lift, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, ← map_mul,
inl_left_mul_inr_right, forall_const]
/-- Two maps out of the semidirect product are equal if they're equal after composition
with both `inl` and `inr` -/
theorem hom_ext {f g : N ⋊[φ] G →* H} (hl : f.comp inl = g.comp inl)
(hr : f.comp inr = g.comp inr) : f = g := by
rw [lift_unique f, lift_unique g]
simp only [*]
/-- The homomorphism from a semidirect product of subgroups to the ambient group. -/
@[simps!]
def monoidHomSubgroup {H K : Subgroup G} (h : K ≤ H.normalizer) :
H ⋊[(H.normalizerMonoidHom).comp (inclusion h)] K →* G :=
lift H.subtype K.subtype (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
/-- The isomorphism from a semidirect product of complementary subgroups to the ambient group. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def mulEquivSubgroup {H K : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] (h : H.IsComplement' K) :
H ⋊[(H.normalizerMonoidHom).comp (inclusion (H.normalizer_eq_top ▸ le_top))] K ≃* G :=
MulEquiv.ofBijective (monoidHomSubgroup _) ((equivProd.bijective_comp _).mpr h)
end lift
section Map
variable {N₁ G₁ N₂ G₂ : Type*} [Group N₁] [Group G₁] [Group N₂] [Group G₂]
{φ₁ : G₁ →* MulAut N₁} {φ₂ : G₂ →* MulAut N₂}
(fn : N₁ →* N₂) (fg : G₁ →* G₂)
(h : ∀ g : G₁, fn.comp (φ₁ g).toMonoidHom = (φ₂ (fg g)).toMonoidHom.comp fn)
/-- Define a map from `N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁` to `N₂ ⋊[φ₂] G₂` given maps `N₁ →* N₂` and `G₁ →* G₂` that
satisfy a commutativity condition `∀ n g, fn (φ₁ g n) = φ₂ (fg g) (fn n)`. -/
def map : N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁ →* N₂ ⋊[φ₂] G₂ where
toFun x := ⟨fn x.1, fg x.2⟩
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by
replace h := DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (h x.right) y.left
ext <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_left (g : N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁) : (map fn fg h g).left = fn g.left := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_right (g : N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁) : (map fn fg h g).right = fg g.right := rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_map : rightHom.comp (map fn fg h) = fg.comp rightHom := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_inl (n : N₁) : map fn fg h (inl n) = inl (fn n) := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_inl : (map fn fg h).comp inl = inl.comp fn := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_inr (g : G₁) : map fn fg h (inr g) = inr (fg g) := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_inr : (map fn fg h).comp inr = inr.comp fg := by ext <;> simp [map]
end Map
section Congr
variable {N₁ G₁ N₂ G₂ : Type*} [Group N₁] [Group G₁] [Group N₂] [Group G₂]
{φ₁ : G₁ →* MulAut N₁} {φ₂ : G₂ →* MulAut N₂}
(fn : N₁ ≃* N₂) (fg : G₁ ≃* G₂)
(h : ∀ g : G₁, (φ₁ g).trans fn = fn.trans (φ₂ (fg g)))
/-- Define an isomorphism from `N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁` to `N₂ ⋊[φ₂] G₂` given isomorphisms `N₁ ≃* N₂` and
`G₁ ≃* G₂` that satisfy a commutativity condition `∀ n g, fn (φ₁ g n) = φ₂ (fg g) (fn n)`. -/
@[simps]
def congr : N₁ ⋊[φ₁] G₁ ≃* N₂ ⋊[φ₂] G₂ where
toFun x := ⟨fn x.1, fg x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨fn.symm x.1, fg.symm x.2⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
map_mul' x y := by
replace h := DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (h x.right) y.left
ext <;> simp_all
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SemidirectProduct.lean | 300 | 300 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Floor
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Group
/-!
# Topological facts about `Int.floor`, `Int.ceil` and `Int.fract`
This file proves statements about limits and continuity of functions involving `floor`, `ceil` and
`fract`.
## Main declarations
* `tendsto_floor_atTop`, `tendsto_floor_atBot`, `tendsto_ceil_atTop`, `tendsto_ceil_atBot`:
`Int.floor` and `Int.ceil` tend to +-∞ in +-∞.
* `continuousOn_floor`: `Int.floor` is continuous on `Ico n (n + 1)`, because constant.
* `continuousOn_ceil`: `Int.ceil` is continuous on `Ioc n (n + 1)`, because constant.
* `continuousOn_fract`: `Int.fract` is continuous on `Ico n (n + 1)`.
* `ContinuousOn.comp_fract`: Precomposing a continuous function satisfying `f 0 = f 1` with
`Int.fract` yields another continuous function.
-/
open Filter Function Int Set Topology
namespace FloorSemiring
open scoped Nat
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [FloorSemiring K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
theorem tendsto_mul_pow_div_factorial_sub_atTop (a c : K) (d : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ a * c ^ n / (n - d)!) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_order]
constructor
all_goals
intro ε hε
filter_upwards [eventually_mul_pow_lt_factorial_sub (a * ε⁻¹) c d] with n h
rw [mul_right_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv] at h
· rw [div_lt_iff_of_neg hε] at h
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.factorial_pos _))]
· rw [div_lt_iff₀ hε] at h
rwa [div_lt_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.factorial_pos _))]
theorem tendsto_pow_div_factorial_atTop (c : K) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ c ^ n / n !) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert tendsto_mul_pow_div_factorial_sub_atTop 1 c 0
rw [one_mul]
end FloorSemiring
variable {α β γ : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [FloorRing α]
section
variable [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
-- TODO: move to `Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Floor`
theorem tendsto_floor_atTop : Tendsto (floor : α → ℤ) atTop atTop :=
floor_mono.tendsto_atTop_atTop fun b =>
⟨(b + 1 : ℤ), by rw [floor_intCast]; exact (lt_add_one _).le⟩
theorem tendsto_floor_atBot : Tendsto (floor : α → ℤ) atBot atBot :=
floor_mono.tendsto_atBot_atBot fun b => ⟨b, (floor_intCast _).le⟩
theorem tendsto_ceil_atTop : Tendsto (ceil : α → ℤ) atTop atTop :=
ceil_mono.tendsto_atTop_atTop fun b => ⟨b, (ceil_intCast _).ge⟩
theorem tendsto_ceil_atBot : Tendsto (ceil : α → ℤ) atBot atBot :=
ceil_mono.tendsto_atBot_atBot fun b =>
⟨(b - 1 : ℤ), by rw [ceil_intCast]; exact (sub_one_lt _).le⟩
end
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
theorem continuousOn_floor (n : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => floor x : α → α) (Ico n (n + 1) : Set α) :=
(continuousOn_congr <| floor_eq_on_Ico' n).mpr continuousOn_const
theorem continuousOn_ceil [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ceil x : α → α) (Ioc (n - 1) n : Set α) :=
(continuousOn_congr <| ceil_eq_on_Ioc' n).mpr continuousOn_const
section OrderClosedTopology
|
variable [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [OrderClosedTopology α]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 90 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# Homological complexes supported in a single degree
We define `single V j c : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c`,
which constructs complexes in `V` of shape `c`, supported in degree `j`.
In `ChainComplex.toSingle₀Equiv` we characterize chain maps to an
`ℕ`-indexed complex concentrated in degree 0; they are equivalent to
`{ f : C.X 0 ⟶ X // C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0 }`.
(This is useful translating between a projective resolution and
an augmented exact complex of projectives.)
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
universe v u
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] [HasZeroObject V]
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c` creating a chain complex supported in a single degree.
-/
noncomputable def single (j : ι) : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c where
obj A :=
{ X := fun i => if i = j then A else 0
d := fun _ _ => 0 }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) ≫ f ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) else 0 }
map_id A := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-07
the previous sensible proof `rw [if_neg h]; simp` fails with "motive not type correct".
The following is horrible. -/
convert (id_zero (C := V)).symm
all_goals simp [if_neg h]
map_comp f g := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
variable {V}
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_X_self (j : ι) (A : V) :
((single V c j).obj A).X j = A := if_pos rfl
lemma isZero_single_obj_X (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single V c j).obj A).X i) := by
dsimp [single]
rw [if_neg hi]
exact Limits.isZero_zero V
/-- The object in degree `i` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A` when `i = j`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXIsoOfEq (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i = j) :
((single V c j).obj A).X i ≅ A :=
eqToIso (by subst hi; simp [single])
/-- The object in degree `j` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXSelf (j : ι) (A : V) : ((single V c j).obj A).X j ≅ A :=
singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A j rfl
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_d (j : ι) (A : V) (k l : ι) :
((single V c j).obj A).d k l = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem single_map_f_self (j : ι) {A B : V} (f : A ⟶ B) :
((single V c j).map f).f j = (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom ≫
f ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv := by
dsimp [single]
rw [dif_pos rfl]
| rfl
variable (V)
/-- The natural isomorphism `single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V`. -/
@[simps!]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Single.lean | 91 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject.Unitor
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
/-!
# The monoidal category structures on graded objects
Assuming that `C` is a monoidal category and that `I` is an additive monoid,
we introduce a partially defined tensor product on the category `GradedObject I C`:
given `X₁` and `X₂` two objects in `GradedObject I C`, we define
`GradedObject.Monoidal.tensorObj X₁ X₂` under the assumption `HasTensor X₁ X₂`
that the coproduct of `X₁ i ⊗ X₂ j` for `i + j = n` exists for any `n : I`.
Under suitable assumptions about the existence of coproducts and the
preservation of certain coproducts by the tensor products in `C`, we
obtain a monoidal category structure on `GradedObject I C`.
In particular, if `C` has finite coproducts to which the tensor
product commutes, we obtain a monoidal category structure on `GradedObject ℕ C`.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits MonoidalCategory Category
variable {I : Type u} [AddMonoid I] {C : Type*} [Category C] [MonoidalCategory C]
namespace GradedObject
/-- The tensor product of two graded objects `X₁` and `X₂` exists if for any `n`,
the coproduct of the objects `X₁ i ⊗ X₂ j` for `i + j = n` exists. -/
abbrev HasTensor (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) : Prop :=
HasMap (((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj X₁).obj X₂) (fun ⟨i, j⟩ => i + j)
lemma hasTensor_of_iso {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C}
(e₁ : X₁ ≅ Y₁) (e₂ : X₂ ≅ Y₂) [HasTensor X₁ X₂] :
HasTensor Y₁ Y₂ := by
let e : ((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj X₁).obj X₂ ≅
((mapBifunctor (curriedTensor C) I I).obj Y₁).obj Y₂ := isoMk _ _
(fun ⟨i, j⟩ ↦ (eval i).mapIso e₁ ⊗ (eval j).mapIso e₂)
exact hasMap_of_iso e _
namespace Monoidal
/-- The tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable abbrev tensorObj (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) [HasTensor X₁ X₂] :
GradedObject I C :=
mapBifunctorMapObj (curriedTensor C) (fun ⟨i, j⟩ => i + j) X₁ X₂
section
variable (X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C) [HasTensor X₁ X₂]
/-- The inclusion of a summand in a tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable def ιTensorObj (i₁ i₂ i₁₂ : I) (h : i₁ + i₂ = i₁₂) :
X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ tensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁₂ :=
ιMapBifunctorMapObj (curriedTensor C) _ _ _ _ _ _ h
variable {X₁ X₂}
@[ext]
lemma tensorObj_ext {A : C} {j : I} (f g : tensorObj X₁ X₂ j ⟶ A)
(h : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (hi : i₁ + i₂ = j),
ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ j hi ≫ f = ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ j hi ≫ g) : f = g := by
apply mapObj_ext
rintro ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ hi
exact h i₁ i₂ hi
/-- Constructor for morphisms from a tensor product of two graded objects. -/
noncomputable def tensorObjDesc {A : C} {k : I}
(f : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (_ : i₁ + i₂ = k), X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ A) : tensorObj X₁ X₂ k ⟶ A :=
mapBifunctorMapObjDesc f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_tensorObjDesc {A : C} {k : I}
(f : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : I) (_ : i₁ + i₂ = k), X₁ i₁ ⊗ X₂ i₂ ⟶ A) (i₁ i₂ : I) (hi : i₁ + i₂ = k) :
ιTensorObj X₁ X₂ i₁ i₂ k hi ≫ tensorObjDesc f = f i₁ i₂ hi := by
apply ι_mapBifunctorMapObjDesc
end
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X₁ Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y₂` induced by morphisms of graded
objects `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂`. -/
noncomputable def tensorHom {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X₁ Y₁] [HasTensor X₂ Y₂] :
tensorObj X₁ Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y₂ :=
mapBifunctorMapMap _ _ f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_tensorHom {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X₁ Y₁] [HasTensor X₂ Y₂] (i₁ i₂ i₁₂ : I) (h : i₁ + i₂ = i₁₂) :
ιTensorObj X₁ Y₁ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h ≫ tensorHom f g i₁₂ =
(f i₁ ⊗ g i₂) ≫ ιTensorObj X₂ Y₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h := by
rw [MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def, assoc]
apply ι_mapBifunctorMapMap
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂` induced by a morphism of graded objects
`φ : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂`. -/
noncomputable abbrev whiskerLeft (X : GradedObject I C) {Y₁ Y₂ : GradedObject I C} (φ : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂)
[HasTensor X Y₁] [HasTensor X Y₂] : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂ :=
tensorHom (𝟙 X) φ
/-- The morphism `tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y` induced by a morphism of graded objects
`φ : X₁ ⟶ X₂`. -/
noncomputable abbrev whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : GradedObject I C} (φ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : GradedObject I C)
[HasTensor X₁ Y] [HasTensor X₂ Y] : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y :=
tensorHom φ (𝟙 Y)
@[simp]
| lemma tensor_id (X Y : GradedObject I C) [HasTensor X Y] :
tensorHom (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorHom, mapBifunctorMapMap]
simp only [Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app, comp_id, mapMap_id]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GradedObject/Monoidal.lean | 116 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# The partial recursive functions
The partial recursive functions are defined similarly to the primitive
recursive functions, but now all functions are partial, implemented
using the `Part` monad, and there is an additional operation, called
μ-recursion, which performs unbounded minimization: `μ f` returns the
least natural number `n` for which `f n = 0`, or diverges if such `n` doesn't exist.
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for functions `f : ℕ →. ℕ`
- `Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for partial functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Computable f`: `f` is partial recursive, for total functions between `Primcodable` types
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable Part
attribute [-simp] not_forall
namespace Nat
section Rfind
variable (p : ℕ →. Bool)
private def lbp (m n : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n + 1 ∧ ∀ k ≤ n, false ∈ p k
private def wf_lbp (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom) : WellFounded (lbp p) :=
⟨by
let ⟨n, pn⟩ := H
suffices ∀ m k, n ≤ k + m → Acc (lbp p) k by exact fun a => this _ _ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
intro m k kn
induction' m with m IH generalizing k <;> refine ⟨_, fun y r => ?_⟩ <;> rcases r with ⟨rfl, a⟩
· injection mem_unique pn.1 (a _ kn)
· exact IH _ (by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; exact kn)⟩
variable (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a subtype. -/
def rfindX : { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } :=
suffices ∀ k, (∀ n < k, false ∈ p n) → { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } from
this 0 fun _ => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim
@WellFounded.fix _ _ (lbp p) (wf_lbp p H)
(by
intro m IH al
have pm : (p m).Dom := by
rcases H with ⟨n, h₁, h₂⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h₃ | h₃ | h₃)
· exact h₂ _ h₃
· rw [h₃]
exact h₁.fst
· injection mem_unique h₁ (al _ h₃)
cases e : (p m).get pm
· suffices ∀ᵉ k ≤ m, false ∈ p k from IH _ ⟨rfl, this⟩ fun n h => this _ (le_of_lt_succ h)
intro n h
rcases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h | h
· exact al _ h
· rw [h]
exact ⟨_, e⟩
· exact ⟨m, ⟨_, e⟩, al⟩)
end Rfind
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfind (p : ℕ →. Bool) : Part ℕ :=
⟨_, fun h => (rfindX p h).1⟩
theorem rfind_spec {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : true ∈ p n :=
h.snd ▸ (rfindX p h.fst).2.1
theorem rfind_min {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
@(h.snd ▸ @((rfindX p h.fst).2.2))
@[simp]
theorem rfind_dom {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → (p m).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rfind_dom' {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m ≤ n → (p m).Dom :=
exists_congr fun _ =>
and_congr_right fun pn =>
⟨fun H _ h => (Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le h).elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ pn.fst) (H _), fun H _ h =>
H (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rfind {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} :
n ∈ rfind p ↔ true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
⟨fun h => ⟨rfind_spec h, @rfind_min _ _ h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨_, h₁, fun {m} mn => (h₂ mn).fst⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | h | h)
· injection mem_unique (h₂ h) (rfind_spec hm)
· rwa [← h]
· injection mem_unique h₁ (rfind_min hm h)⟩
theorem rfind_min' {p : ℕ → Bool} {m : ℕ} (pm : p m) : ∃ n ∈ rfind p, n ≤ m :=
have : true ∈ (p : ℕ →. Bool) m := ⟨trivial, pm⟩
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨m, this, fun {_} _ => ⟨⟩⟩
⟨n, hn, not_lt.1 fun h => by injection mem_unique this (rfind_min hn h)⟩
theorem rfind_zero_none (p : ℕ →. Bool) (p0 : p 0 = Part.none) : rfind p = Part.none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h =>
let ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := rfind_dom'.1 h.fst
(p0 ▸ h₂ (zero_le _) : (@Part.none Bool).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `f n`, where all `f k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfindOpt {α} (f : ℕ → Option α) : Part α :=
(rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).bind fun n => f n
theorem rfindOpt_spec {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} {a} (h : a ∈ rfindOpt f) : ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
let ⟨n, _, h₂⟩ := mem_bind_iff.1 h
⟨n, mem_coe.1 h₂⟩
theorem rfindOpt_dom {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} : (rfindOpt f).Dom ↔ ∃ n a, a ∈ f n :=
⟨fun h => (rfindOpt_spec ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp fun _ h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun h => by
have h' : ∃ n, (f n).isSome := h.imp fun n => Option.isSome_iff_exists.2
have s := Nat.find_spec h'
have fd : (rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).Dom :=
⟨Nat.find h', by simpa using s.symm, fun _ _ => trivial⟩
refine ⟨fd, ?_⟩
have := rfind_spec (get_mem fd)
simpa using this⟩
theorem rfindOpt_mono {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} (H : ∀ {a m n}, m ≤ n → a ∈ f m → a ∈ f n) {a} :
a ∈ rfindOpt f ↔ ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
⟨rfindOpt_spec, fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
have h' := rfindOpt_dom.2 ⟨_, _, h⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := rfindOpt_spec ⟨h', rfl⟩
have := (H (le_max_left _ _) h).symm.trans (H (le_max_right _ _) hk)
simp at this; simp [this, get_mem]⟩
/-- `Partrec f` means that the partial function `f : ℕ → ℕ` is partially recursive. -/
inductive Partrec : (ℕ →. ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Partrec (pure 0)
| succ : Partrec succ
| left : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => pair <$> f n <*> g n
| comp {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => g n >>= f
| prec {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec (unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (f a) fun y IH => do let i ← IH; g (pair a (pair y i)))
| rfind {f} : Partrec f → Partrec fun a => rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (pair a n)
namespace Partrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : ℕ →. ℕ} {g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Partrec g :=
hf.of_eq fun n => eq_some_iff.2 (H n)
theorem of_primrec {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Partrec f := by
induction hf with
| zero => exact zero
| succ => exact succ
| left => exact left
| right => exact right
| pair _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.pair pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp [Seq.seq]
| comp _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.comp pg).of_eq_tot fun n => (by simp)
| prec _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.prec pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp only [unpaired, PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind]
induction n.unpair.2 with
| zero => simp
| succ m IH =>
simp only [mem_bind_iff, mem_some_iff]
exact ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩
protected theorem some : Partrec some :=
of_primrec Primrec.id
theorem none : Partrec fun _ => none :=
(of_primrec (Nat.Primrec.const 1)).rfind.of_eq fun _ =>
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => by simp at h
theorem prec' {f g h} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) (hh : Partrec h) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind fun n => n.rec (g a)
fun y IH => do {let i ← IH; h (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))} :=
((prec hg hh).comp (pair Partrec.some hf)).of_eq fun a =>
ext fun s => by simp [Seq.seq]
theorem ppred : Partrec fun n => ppred n :=
have : Primrec₂ fun n m => if n = Nat.succ m then 0 else 1 :=
(Primrec.ite
(@PrimrecRel.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Primrec.eq Primrec.fst (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp Primrec.snd))
(_root_.Primrec.const 0) (_root_.Primrec.const 1)).to₂
(of_primrec (Primrec₂.unpaired'.2 this)).rfind.of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
· exact
eq_none_iff.2 fun a ⟨⟨m, h, _⟩, _⟩ => by
simp [show 0 ≠ m.succ by intro h; injection h] at h
· refine eq_some_iff.2 ?_
simp only [mem_rfind, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff, decide_true, mem_some_iff,
false_eq_decide_iff, true_and]
intro m h
simp [ne_of_gt h]
end Partrec
end Nat
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α →. σ) :=
Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := α) n) fun a => (f a).map encode
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β →. σ) :=
Partrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- Computable functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types:
a function is computable if and only if it is partially recursive (as a partial function) -/
def Computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → σ) :=
Partrec (f : α →. σ)
/-- Computable functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Computable₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
theorem Primrec.to_comp {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) :
Computable f :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp (Nat.Partrec.of_primrec hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp; cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
nonrec theorem Primrec₂.to_comp {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Computable₂ f :=
hf.to_comp
protected theorem Computable.partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ}
(hf : Computable f) : Partrec (f : α →. σ) :=
hf
protected theorem Computable₂.partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) : Partrec₂ fun a => (f a : β →. σ) :=
hf
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Computable f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Computable g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (s : σ) : Computable fun _ : α => s :=
(Primrec.const _).to_comp
theorem ofOption {f : α → Option β} (hf : Computable f) : Partrec fun a => (f a : Part β) :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => by
rcases decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp
rcases f a with - | b <;> simp
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Computable f) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
protected theorem id : Computable (@id α) :=
Primrec.id.to_comp
theorem fst : Computable (@Prod.fst α β) :=
Primrec.fst.to_comp
theorem snd : Computable (@Prod.snd α β) :=
Primrec.snd.to_comp
nonrec theorem pair {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a, g a) :=
(hf.pair hg).of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp [Seq.seq]
theorem unpair : Computable Nat.unpair :=
Primrec.unpair.to_comp
theorem succ : Computable Nat.succ :=
Primrec.succ.to_comp
theorem pred : Computable Nat.pred :=
Primrec.pred.to_comp
theorem nat_bodd : Computable Nat.bodd :=
Primrec.nat_bodd.to_comp
theorem nat_div2 : Computable Nat.div2 :=
Primrec.nat_div2.to_comp
theorem sumInl : Computable (@Sum.inl α β) :=
Primrec.sumInl.to_comp
theorem sumInr : Computable (@Sum.inr α β) :=
Primrec.sumInr.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Computable.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Computable.sumInr
theorem list_cons : Computable₂ (@List.cons α) :=
Primrec.list_cons.to_comp
theorem list_reverse : Computable (@List.reverse α) :=
Primrec.list_reverse.to_comp
theorem list_getElem? : Computable₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
Primrec.list_getElem?.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_append : Computable₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
Primrec.list_append.to_comp
theorem list_concat : Computable₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
Primrec.list_concat.to_comp
theorem list_length : Computable (@List.length α) :=
Primrec.list_length.to_comp
theorem vector_cons {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.cons α n) :=
Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp
theorem vector_toList {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.toList α n) :=
Primrec.vector_toList.to_comp
theorem vector_length {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.length α n) :=
Primrec.vector_length.to_comp
theorem vector_head {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.head α n) :=
Primrec.vector_head.to_comp
theorem vector_tail {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.tail α n) :=
Primrec.vector_tail.to_comp
theorem vector_get {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
Primrec.vector_get.to_comp
theorem vector_ofFn' {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.ofFn α n) :=
Primrec.vector_ofFn'.to_comp
theorem fin_app {n} : Computable₂ (@id (Fin n → σ)) :=
Primrec.fin_app.to_comp
protected theorem encode : Computable (@encode α _) :=
Primrec.encode.to_comp
protected theorem decode : Computable (decode (α := α)) :=
Primrec.decode.to_comp
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Computable (ofNat α) :=
(Primrec.ofNat _).to_comp
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem option_some : Computable (@Option.some α) :=
Primrec.option_some.to_comp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem of_eq {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : α →. σ} {g : α → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Computable g :=
hf.of_eq fun a => eq_some_iff.2 (H a)
theorem none : Partrec fun _ : α => @Part.none σ :=
Nat.Partrec.none.of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
protected theorem some : Partrec (@Part.some α) :=
Computable.id
theorem _root_.Decidable.Partrec.const' (s : Part σ) [Decidable s.Dom] : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
(Computable.ofOption (const (toOption s))).of_eq fun _ => of_toOption s
theorem const' (s : Part σ) : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
haveI := Classical.dec s.Dom
Decidable.Partrec.const' s
protected theorem bind {f : α →. β} {g : α → β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(hg.comp (Nat.Partrec.some.pair hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp [Seq.seq]; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem map {f : α →. β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
simpa [bind_some_eq_map] using Partrec.bind (g := fun a x => some (g a x)) hf hg
theorem to₂ {f : α × β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α →. σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ →. σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec g)
(hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).rec (g a) fun y IH => IH.bind fun i => h a (y, i) :=
(Nat.Partrec.prec' hf hg hh).of_eq fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e]
induction' f a with m IH <;> simp
rw [IH, Part.bind_map]
congr; funext s
simp [encodek]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β →. σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable g) :
Partrec fun a => f (g a) :=
(hf.comp hg).of_eq fun n => by simp; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec f := by simp [Partrec, map_id']
theorem map_encode_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map encode) ↔ Partrec f :=
Iff.rfl
end Partrec
namespace Partrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ →. α} : Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using Partrec.comp (g := fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.1, p.2)) h Primrec₂.pair.to_comp,
fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair.to_comp⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
Partrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ →. σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Partrec₂ f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable h) : Partrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ →. σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Partrec₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Partrec₂
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => f (g a) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
end Computable
namespace Computable₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Computable₂ f := hf
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Computable h) : Computable fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Computable₂
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem rfind {p : α → ℕ →. Bool} (hp : Partrec₂ p) : Partrec fun a => Nat.rfind (p a) :=
(Nat.Partrec.rfind <|
hp.map ((Primrec.dom_bool fun b => cond b 0 1).comp Primrec.snd).to₂.to_comp).of_eq
fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, Nat.rfind_zero_none, map_id']
congr; funext n
simp only [map_map, Function.comp]
refine map_id' (fun b => ?_) _
cases b <;> rfl
theorem rfindOpt {f : α → ℕ → Option σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) :
Partrec fun a => Nat.rfindOpt (f a) :=
(rfind (Primrec.option_isSome.to_comp.comp hf).partrec.to₂).bind (ofOption hf)
theorem nat_casesOn_right {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).casesOn (some (g a)) (h a) :=
(nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst (pred.comp <| hf.comp fst)).to₂).of_eq fun a => by
simp only [PFun.coe_val, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]; rcases f a with - | n <;> simp
refine ext fun b => ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· rcases mem_bind_iff.1 H with ⟨c, _, h₂⟩
exact h₂
· have : ∀ m, (Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => Part σ)
(Part.some (g a)) (fun y IH => IH.bind fun _ => h a n) m).Dom := by
intro m
induction m <;> simp [*, H.fst]
exact ⟨⟨this n, H.fst⟩, H.snd⟩
theorem bind_decode₂_iff {f : α →. σ} :
Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode₂ α n) fun a => (f a).map encode :=
⟨fun hf =>
nat_iff.1 <|
(Computable.ofOption Primrec.decode₂.to_comp).bind <|
(map hf (Computable.encode.comp snd).to₂).comp snd,
fun h =>
map_encode_iff.1 <| by simpa [encodek₂] using (nat_iff.2 h).comp (@Computable.encode α _)⟩
theorem vector_mOfFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α →. σ},
(∀ i, Partrec (f i)) → Partrec fun a : α => Vector.mOfFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => const _
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [Vector.mOfFn, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, pure_eq_some, bind_eq_bind]
exact
(hf 0).bind
(Partrec.bind ((vector_mOfFn fun i => hf i.succ).comp fst)
(Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))
end Partrec
@[simp]
theorem Vector.mOfFn_part_some {α n} :
∀ f : Fin n → α,
(List.Vector.mOfFn fun i => Part.some (f i)) = Part.some (List.Vector.ofFn f) :=
Vector.mOfFn_pure
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => Option.some (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| Primrec.pred.to_comp.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).bind (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f :=
⟨fun hf =>
Nat.Partrec.of_eq
(((Partrec.nat_iff.2
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp <| Nat.Partrec.of_primrec <| Primcodable.prim (α := β))).comp
snd).bind
(Computable.comp hf fst).to₂.partrec₂)
fun n => by
simp only [decode_prod_val, decode_nat, Option.map_some', PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind,
bind_some, Part.map_bind, map_some]
cases decode (α := α) n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases decode (α := β) n.unpair.2 <;> simp,
fun hf => by
have :
Partrec fun a : α × ℕ =>
(encode (decode (α := β) a.2)).casesOn (some Option.none)
fun n => Part.map (f a.1) (decode (α := β) n) :=
Partrec.nat_casesOn_right
(h := fun (a : α × ℕ) (n : ℕ) ↦ map (fun b ↦ f a.1 b) (Part.ofOption (decode n)))
(Primrec.encdec.to_comp.comp snd) (const Option.none)
((ofOption (Computable.decode.comp snd)).map (hf.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd).to₂)
refine this.of_eq fun a => ?_
simp; cases decode (α := β) a.2 <;> simp [encodek]⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).map (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f := by
convert (bind_decode_iff (f := fun a => Option.some ∘ f a)).trans option_some_iff
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => σ) (g a) (fun y IH => h a (y, IH)) (f a) :=
(Partrec.nat_rec hf hg hh.partrec₂).of_eq fun a => by simp; induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.casesOn (motive := fun _ => σ) (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst <| fst.comp snd).to₂
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Computable c) (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) : Computable fun a => cond (c a) (f a) (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (map_decode_iff.2 hg)).of_eq fun a => by
cases o a <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) : Computable fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const Option.none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
convert option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem option_getD {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).getD (g a) :=
(Computable.option_casesOn hf hg (show Computable₂ fun _ b => b from Computable.snd)).of_eq
fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem subtype_mk {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {h : ∀ a, p (f a)}
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hf : Computable f) :
@Computable _ _ _ (Primcodable.subtype hp) fun a => (⟨f a, h a⟩ : Subtype p) :=
hf
theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by
rcases f a with b | c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := sumCasesOn
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Computable₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = Option.some (f a n)) : Computable₂ f :=
suffices Computable₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a => by
simp [List.getElem?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self a.2)]
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec snd (const (Option.some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a => by
induction' a.2 with n IH; · rfl
simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
theorem list_ofFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ},
(∀ i, Computable (f i)) → Computable fun a => List.ofFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => by
simp only [List.ofFn_zero]
exact const []
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [List.ofFn_succ]
exact list_cons.comp (hf 0) (list_ofFn fun i => hf i.succ)
theorem vector_ofFn {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ} (hf : ∀ i, Computable (f i)) :
Computable fun a => List.Vector.ofFn fun i => f i a :=
(Partrec.vector_mOfFn hf).of_eq fun a => by simp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem option_some_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map Option.some) ↔ Partrec f :=
⟨fun h => (Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp [Part.bind_assoc, bind_some_eq_map],
fun hf => hf.map (option_some.comp snd).to₂⟩
theorem optionCasesOn_right {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β →. σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
@Partrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (Part.some (f a)) (g a) :=
have :
Partrec fun a : α =>
Nat.casesOn (encode (o a)) (Part.some (f a)) (fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := β) n) (g a)) :=
nat_casesOn_right (h := fun a n ↦ Part.bind (ofOption (decode n)) fun b ↦ g a b)
| (encode_iff.2 ho) hf.partrec <|
((@Computable.decode β _).comp snd).ofOption.bind (hg.comp (fst.comp fst) snd).to₂
this.of_eq fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
| Mathlib/Computability/Partrec.lean | 689 | 691 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 235 | 255 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic with cardinals
This file collects results about the cardinality of different ordinal operations.
-/
universe u v
open Cardinal Ordinal Set
/-! ### Cardinal operations with ordinal indices -/
namespace Cardinal
/-- Bounds the cardinal of an ordinal-indexed union of sets. -/
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le {β : Type v} {o : Ordinal.{u}} {c : Cardinal.{v}}
(ho : lift.{v} o.card ≤ lift.{u} c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
simp_rw [← mem_Iio, biUnion_eq_iUnion, iUnion, iSup, ← o.enumIsoToType.symm.surjective.range_comp]
rw [← lift_le.{u}]
apply ((mk_iUnion_le_lift _).trans _).trans_eq (mul_eq_self (aleph0_le_lift.2 hc))
rw [mk_toType]
refine mul_le_mul' ho (ciSup_le' ?_)
intro i
simpa using hA _ (o.enumIsoToType.symm i).2
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le {β : Type*} {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal}
(ho : o.card ≤ c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
apply mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le _ hc A hA
rwa [Cardinal.lift_le]
end Cardinal
@[deprecated mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le (since := "2024-11-02")]
alias Ordinal.Cardinal.mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le := mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
theorem lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} [Small.{v} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f i).card := by
simp_rw [← mk_toType]
rw [← mk_sigma, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v} #(Σ _, _), ← Cardinal.lift_umax.{v, u}]
apply lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective (f := enumIsoToType _ ∘ (⟨(enumIsoToType _).symm ·.2,
(mem_Iio.mp ((enumIsoToType _).symm _).2).trans_le (Ordinal.le_iSup _ _)⟩))
rw [EquivLike.comp_surjective]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff.mp hx
exact ⟨⟨i, enumIsoToType _ ⟨x, hi⟩⟩, by simp⟩
theorem card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun i ↦ (f i).card) := by
have := lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card f
rwa [Cardinal.lift_id'] at this
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f ((enumIsoToType o).symm i)).card := by
apply le_of_eq_of_le (congr_arg _ _).symm (card_iSup_le_sum_card _)
simpa using (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ f x)
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} o.card * ⨆ a : Iio o, (f a).card := by
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card f).trans
convert ← sum_le_iSup_lift _
· exact mk_toType o
· exact (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ (f x).card)
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left {a : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (b : Ordinal) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
refine limitRecOn b ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa using one_lt_omega0.le.trans ha
· intro b IH
rw [opow_succ, card_mul, card_succ, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply (max_le_max_left _ IH).trans
rw [← max_assoc, max_self]
exact max_le_max_left _ le_self_add
· rw [ne_eq, card_eq_zero, opow_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨rfl, -⟩
cases omega0_pos.not_le ha
· rwa [aleph0_le_card]
· intro b hb IH
rw [(isNormal_opow (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)).apply_of_isLimit hb]
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup _).trans
rw [Cardinal.lift_id, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply max_le _ (le_max_right _ _)
apply ciSup_le'
intro c
exact (IH c.1 c.2).trans (max_le_max_left _ (card_le_card c.2.le))
· simpa using hb.pos.ne'
· refine le_ciSup_of_le ?_ ⟨1, one_lt_omega0.trans_le <| omega0_le_of_isLimit hb⟩ ?_
· exact Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small _
· simpa
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· apply (card_le_card <| opow_le_opow_left b (nat_lt_omega0 n).le).trans
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl _).trans
simp [hb]
· exact card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b
theorem card_opow_le (a b : Ordinal) : (a ^ b).card ≤ max ℵ₀ (max a.card b.card) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ | hb := eq_nat_or_omega0_le b
· rw [← natCast_opow, card_nat]
exact le_max_of_le_left (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right _ hb).trans (le_max_right _ _)
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha _).trans (le_max_right _ _)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a hb
· exact right_le_opow b (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right a hb).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a (omega0_pos.trans_le hb)
· exact right_le_opow b ha
theorem card_omega0_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : card (ω ^ a) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl h.bot_lt, card_omega0]
theorem card_opow_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : card (a ^ ω) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right h le_rfl, card_omega0, max_comm]
theorem principal_opow_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· ^ ·) (ω_ o) := by
obtain rfl | ho := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos o
· rw [omega_zero]
exact principal_opow_omega0
· intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_omega_iff_card_lt] at ha hb ⊢
apply (card_opow_le a b).trans_lt (max_lt _ (max_lt ha hb))
rwa [← aleph_zero, aleph_lt_aleph]
theorem IsInitial.principal_opow {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· ^ ·) o := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := mem_range_omega_iff.2 ⟨ho, h⟩
exact principal_opow_omega a
theorem principal_opow_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· ^ ·) c.ord := by
apply (isInitial_ord c).principal_opow
rwa [omega0_le_ord]
/-! ### Initial ordinals are principal -/
theorem principal_add_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· + ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_add] at *
exact add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_add {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· + ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_add_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_add_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_add (omega0_le_omega o)
theorem principal_mul_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· * ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_mul] at *
exact mul_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_mul {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· * ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_mul_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_mul_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· * ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_mul (omega0_le_omega o)
@[deprecated principal_add_omega (since := "2024-11-08")]
theorem _root_.Cardinal.principal_add_aleph (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ℵ_ o).ord :=
principal_add_ord <| aleph0_le_aleph o
end Ordinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean | 975 | 992 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
/-!
# The plus construction for presheaves.
This file contains the construction of `P⁺`, for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`
where `C` is endowed with a grothendieck topology `J`.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00W1> for details.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open Opposite
universe w v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {D : Type w} [Category.{max v u} D]
noncomputable section
variable [∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D)
/-- The diagram whose colimit defines the values of `plus`. -/
@[simps]
def diagram (X : C) : (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj S := multiequalizer (S.unop.index P)
map {S _} f :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) (I.map f.unop))
(fun I => Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) (Cover.Relation.mk' (I.r.map f.unop)))
/-- A helper definition used to define the morphisms for `plus`. -/
@[simps]
def diagramPullback {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : J.diagram P Y ⟶ (J.pullback f).op ⋙ J.diagram P X where
app S :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) I.base) fun I =>
Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) (Cover.Relation.mk' I.r.base)
naturality S T f := Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => by dsimp; simp; rfl)
/-- A natural transformation `P ⟶ Q` induces a natural transformation
between diagrams whose colimits define the values of `plus`. -/
@[simps]
def diagramNatTrans {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (X : C) : J.diagram P X ⟶ J.diagram Q X where
app W :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun _ => Multiequalizer.ι _ _ ≫ η.app _) (fun i => by
dsimp only
erw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← η.naturality, ← η.naturality,
Multiequalizer.condition_assoc]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_id (X : C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (𝟙 P) X = 𝟙 (J.diagram P X) := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
simp
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_zero [Preadditive D] (X : C) (P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (0 : P ⟶ Q) X = 0 := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
simp
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_comp {P Q R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (γ : Q ⟶ R) (X : C) :
J.diagramNatTrans (η ≫ γ) X = J.diagramNatTrans η X ≫ J.diagramNatTrans γ X := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
simp
variable (D) in
/-- `J.diagram P`, as a functor in `P`. -/
@[simps]
def diagramFunctor (X : C) : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) ⥤ (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj P := J.diagram P X
map η := J.diagramNatTrans η X
variable [∀ X : C, HasColimitsOfShape (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ D]
/-- The plus construction, associating a presheaf to any presheaf.
See `plusFunctor` below for a functorial version. -/
def plusObj : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj X := colimit (J.diagram P X.unop)
map f := colimMap (J.diagramPullback P f.unop) ≫ colimit.pre _ _
map_id := by
intro X
refine colimit.hom_ext (fun S => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [diagramPullback_app, colimit.ι_pre, ι_colimMap_assoc, Category.comp_id]
let e := S.unop.pullbackId
dsimp only [Functor.op, pullback_obj]
rw [← colimit.w _ e.inv.op, ← Category.assoc]
convert Category.id_comp (colimit.ι (diagram J P (unop X)) S)
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
dsimp [Cover.Arrow.map, Cover.Arrow.base]
cases I
congr
simp
map_comp := by
intro X Y Z f g
refine colimit.hom_ext (fun S => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [diagramPullback_app, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre, ι_colimMap_assoc,
Category.assoc]
let e := S.unop.pullbackComp g.unop f.unop
dsimp only [Functor.op, pullback_obj]
rw [← colimit.w _ e.inv.op, ← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Category.assoc]
cases I
dsimp only [Cover.Arrow.base, Cover.Arrow.map]
congr 2
simp
/-- An auxiliary definition used in `plus` below. -/
def plusMap {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) : J.plusObj P ⟶ J.plusObj Q where
app X := colimMap (J.diagramNatTrans η X.unop)
naturality := by
intro X Y f
dsimp [plusObj]
ext
simp only [diagramPullback_app, ι_colimMap, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
ι_colimMap_assoc, Category.assoc]
simp_rw [← Category.assoc]
congr 1
exact Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => by dsimp; simp)
@[simp]
theorem plusMap_id (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : J.plusMap (𝟙 P) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext : 2
dsimp only [plusMap, plusObj]
rw [J.diagramNatTrans_id, NatTrans.id_app]
ext
dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem plusMap_zero [Preadditive D] (P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : J.plusMap (0 : P ⟶ Q) = 0 := by
ext : 2
refine colimit.hom_ext (fun S => ?_)
erw [comp_zero, colimit.ι_map, J.diagramNatTrans_zero, zero_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem plusMap_comp {P Q R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (γ : Q ⟶ R) :
J.plusMap (η ≫ γ) = J.plusMap η ≫ J.plusMap γ := by
ext : 2
refine colimit.hom_ext (fun S => ?_)
simp [plusMap, J.diagramNatTrans_comp]
variable (D) in
/-- The plus construction, a functor sending `P` to `J.plusObj P`. -/
@[simps]
def plusFunctor : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj P := J.plusObj P
map η := J.plusMap η
/-- The canonical map from `P` to `J.plusObj P`.
See `toPlusNatTrans` for a functorial version. -/
def toPlus : P ⟶ J.plusObj P where
app X := Cover.toMultiequalizer (⊤ : J.Cover X.unop) P ≫ colimit.ι (J.diagram P X.unop) (op ⊤)
naturality := by
intro X Y f
| dsimp [plusObj]
delta Cover.toMultiequalizer
simp only [diagramPullback_app, colimit.ι_pre, ι_colimMap_assoc, Category.assoc]
dsimp only [Functor.op, unop_op]
let e : (J.pullback f.unop).obj ⊤ ⟶ ⊤ := homOfLE (OrderTop.le_top _)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Plus.lean | 182 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.EuclideanDist
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.NormPow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Interval
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegralEqImproper
/-!
# Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality
In this file we prove the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
This states that for compactly supported `C¹`-functions between finite dimensional vector spaces,
we can bound the `L^p`-norm of `u` by the `L^q` norm of the derivative of `u`.
The bound is up to a constant that is independent of the function `u`.
Let `n` be the dimension of the domain.
The main step in the proof, which we dubbed the "grid-lines lemma" below, is a complicated
inductive argument that involves manipulating an `n+1`-fold iterated integral and a product of
`n+2` factors. In each step, one pushes one of the integral inside (all but one of)
the factors of the product using Hölder's inequality. The precise formulation of the induction
hypothesis (`MeasureTheory.GridLines.T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton`) is tricky,
and none of the 5 sources we referenced stated it.
In the formalization we use the operation `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` to work with the iterated
integrals, and use `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'` to conveniently push one of the integrals
inside. The Hölder's inequality step is done using `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le`.
The conclusions of the main results below are an estimation up to a constant multiple.
We don't really care about this constant, other than that it only depends on some pieces of data,
typically `E`, `μ`, `p` and sometimes also the codomain of `u` or the support of `u`.
We state these constants as separate definitions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq`:
The bound holds for `1 ≤ p`, `0 < n` and `q⁻¹ = p⁻¹ - n⁻¹`
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_le`:
The bound holds when `1 ≤ p < n`, `0 ≤ q` and `p⁻¹ - n⁻¹ ≤ q⁻¹`.
Note that in this case the constant depends on the support of `u`.
Potentially also useful:
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_one`: this is the inequality for `q = 1`.
In this version, the codomain can be an arbitrary Banach space.
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq_inner`: in this version,
the codomain is assumed to be a Hilbert space, without restrictions on its dimension.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open Set Function Finset MeasureTheory Measure Filter
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*}
local prefix:max "#" => Fintype.card
/-! ## The grid-lines lemma -/
variable {A : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (A i)]
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (A i))
namespace MeasureTheory
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
namespace GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines operation" (not a standard name) which is central in the inductive proof of the
Sobolev inequality.
For a finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, a finite set `s` of
indices from `ι`, and a (later assumed nonnegative) real number `p`, this operation acts on a
function `f` from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The operation is to partially
integrate, in the `s` co-ordinates, the function whose value at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by
multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each co-ordinate `i` in `s`, of a certain
power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i` direction through `x`.
We are most interested in this operation when the set `s` is the universe in `ι`, but as a proxy for
"induction on dimension" we define it for a general set `s` of co-ordinates: the `s`-grid-lines
operation on a function `f` which is constant along the co-ordinates in `sᶜ` is morally (that is, up
to type-theoretic nonsense) the same thing as the universe-grid-lines operation on the associated
function on the "lower-dimensional" space `Π i : s, A i`. -/
def T (p : ℝ) (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ
variable {p : ℝ}
@[simp] lemma T_univ [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f univ x =
∫⁻ (x : ∀ i, A i), (f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ i : ι, (∫⁻ t : A i, f (update x i t) ∂(μ i)) ^ p) ∂(.pi μ) := by
simp [T, lmarginal_singleton]
@[simp] lemma T_empty (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f ∅ x = f x ^ (1 + p) := by
simp [T]
/-- The main inductive step in the grid-lines lemma for the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
The grid-lines operation `GridLines.T` on a nonnegative function on a finitary product type is
less than or equal to the grid-lines operation of its partial integral in one co-ordinate
(the latter intuitively considered as a function on a space "one dimension down"). -/
theorem T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (s : Finset ι)
(hp : (s.card : ℝ) * p ≤ 1)
(i : ι) (hi : i ∉ s) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
T μ p f (insert i s) ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := by
/- The proof is a tricky computation that relies on Hölder's inequality at its heart.
The left-hand-side is an `|s|+1`-times iterated integral. Let `xᵢ` denote the `i`-th variable.
We first push the integral over the `i`-th variable as the
innermost integral. This is done in a single step with `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'`,
but in fact hides a repeated application of Fubini's theorem.
The integrand is a product of `|s|+2` factors, in `|s|+1` of them we integrate over one
additional variable. We split of the factor that integrates over `xᵢ`,
and apply Hölder's inequality to the remaining factors (whose powers sum exactly to 1).
After reordering factors, and combining two factors into one we obtain the right-hand side. -/
calc T μ p f (insert i s)
= ∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s,
f ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p) * ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ := by
-- unfold `T` and reformulate the exponents
simp_rw [T, card_insert_of_not_mem hi]
congr!
push_cast
ring
_ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ (t : A i),
(f (update x i t) ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (update x i t) ^ p) ∂ (μ i)) ∂μ := by
-- pull out the integral over `xᵢ`
rw [lmarginal_insert' _ _ hi]
· congr! with x t
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
· change Measurable (fun x ↦ _)
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
refine (hf.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ ?_
exact fun _ _ ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.pow_const _
_ ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := lmarginal_mono (s := s) (fun x ↦ ?_)
-- The remainder of the computation happens within an `|s|`-fold iterated integral
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
set X := update x i
have hF₁ : ∀ {j : ι}, Measurable fun t ↦ (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) :=
fun {_} ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.comp <| measurable_update _
have hF₀ : Measurable fun t ↦ f (X t) := hf.comp <| measurable_update _
let k : ℝ := s.card
have hk' : 0 ≤ 1 - k * p := by linarith only [hp]
calc ∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p ∂ (μ i)
= ∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p * (f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p)) ∂(μ i) := by
-- rewrite integrand so that `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) ^ p` comes first
clear_value X
congr! 2 with t
simp_rw [prod_insert hi]
ring_nf
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t)) ^ p ∂(μ i) := by
-- pull out this constant factor
have : ∀ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x := by
intro t
rw [lmarginal_update_of_mem]
exact Iff.mpr Finset.mem_singleton rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_const_mul]
exact (hF₀.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ fun _ _ ↦ hF₁.pow_const _
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⁻ t, f (X t) ∂μ i) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ∂μ i) ^ p) := by
-- apply Hölder's inequality
gcongr
apply ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le
· exact hF₀.aemeasurable
· intros
exact hF₁.aemeasurable
· simp only [sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
ring
· exact hk'
· exact fun _ _ ↦ hp₀
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p) := by
-- absorb the newly-created integrals into `∫⋯∫`
congr! 2
· rw [lmarginal_singleton]
refine prod_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
have hi' : i ∉ ({j} : Finset ι) := by
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj ⊢
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
rw [lmarginal_insert _ hf hi']
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (p + (1 - k * p)) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- combine two `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) x` terms
rw [ENNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg]
· ring
· exact hp₀
· exact hk'
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) *
∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- identify the result with the RHS integrand
congr! 2 with j hj
· ring
· congr! 1
rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· congr
rw [Finset.union_comm]
rfl
· rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
/-- Auxiliary result for the grid-lines lemma. Given a nonnegative function on a finitary product
type indexed by `ι`, and a set `s` in `ι`, consider partially integrating over the variables in
`sᶜ` and performing the "grid-lines operation" (see `GridLines.T`) to the resulting function in the
variables `s`. This theorem states that this operation decreases as the number of grid-lines taken
increases. -/
theorem T_lmarginal_antitone [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Antitone (fun s ↦ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_sᶜ, f ∂μ) s) := by
-- Reformulate (by induction): a function is decreasing on `Finset ι` if it decreases under the
-- insertion of any element to any set.
rw [Finset.antitone_iff_forall_insert_le]
intro s i hi
-- apply the lemma designed to encapsulate the inductive step
convert T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton μ hp₀ s ?_ i hi (hf.lmarginal μ) using 2
· rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· rw [← insert_compl_insert hi]
rfl
rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton_left, not_mem_compl]
exact mem_insert_self i s
· -- the main nontrivial point is to check that an exponent `p` satisfying `0 ≤ p` and
-- `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1` is in the valid range for the inductive-step lemma
refine le_trans ?_ hp
gcongr
suffices (s.card : ℝ) + 1 ≤ #ι by linarith
rw [← card_add_card_compl s]
norm_cast
gcongr
have hi' : sᶜ.Nonempty := ⟨i, by rwa [Finset.mem_compl]⟩
rwa [← card_pos] at hi'
end GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines lemma" (not a standard name), stated with a general parameter `p` as the
exponent. Compare with `lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le`.
For any finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, for any
nonnegative real number `p` such that `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1`, for any function `f` from `Π i, A i` into
the extended nonnegative reals, we consider an associated "grid-lines quantity", the integral of an
associated function from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The value of this function
at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each
co-ordinate `i`, of a certain power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i`
| direction through `x`.
This lemma bounds the Lebesgue integral of the grid-lines quantity by a power of the Lebesgue
integral of `f`. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le
[Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] {p : ℝ} (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p)
(hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i : ι, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, f (update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ^ p ∂.pi μ
≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂.pi μ) ^ (1 + p) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/FunctionalSpaces/SobolevInequality.lean | 253 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Multilinear maps
We define multilinear maps as maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are linear in each
coordinate. Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type
(although some statements will require it to be a fintype). This space, denoted by
`MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂`, inherits a module structure by pointwise addition and multiplication.
## Main definitions
* `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of multilinear maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`.
* `f.map_update_smul` is the multiplicativity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_update_add` is the additivity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_smul_univ` expresses the multiplicativity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`.
* `f.map_add_univ` expresses the additivity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time, writing
`f (m + m')` as the sum over all subsets `s` of `ι` of `f (s.piecewise m m')`.
* `f.map_sum` expresses `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` as the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all possible functions.
See `Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry` for the currying of multilinear maps.
## Implementation notes
Expressing that a map is linear along the `i`-th coordinate when all other coordinates are fixed
can be done in two (equivalent) different ways:
* fixing a vector `m : ∀ (j : ι - i), M₁ j.val`, and then choosing separately the `i`-th coordinate
* fixing a vector `m : ∀j, M₁ j`, and then modifying its `i`-th coordinate
The second way is more artificial as the value of `m` at `i` is not relevant, but it has the
advantage of avoiding subtype inclusion issues. This is the definition we use, based on
`Function.update` that allows to change the value of `m` at `i`.
Note that the use of `Function.update` requires a `DecidableEq ι` term to appear somewhere in the
statement of `MultilinearMap.map_update_add'` and `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul'`.
Three possible choices are:
1. Requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `MultilinearMap` (as we did originally).
2. Using `Classical.decEq ι` in the statement of `map_add'` and `map_smul'`.
3. Quantifying over all possible `DecidableEq ι` instances in the statement of `map_add'` and
`map_smul'`.
Option 1 works fine, but puts unnecessary constraints on the user
(the zero map certainly does not need decidability).
Option 2 looks great at first, but in the common case when `ι = Fin n`
it introduces non-defeq decidability instance diamonds
within the context of proving `map_update_add'` and `map_update_smul'`,
of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = Classical.decEq (Fin n)`.
Option 3 of course does something similar, but of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = _inst`,
which is much easier to clean up since `_inst` is a free variable
and so the equality can just be substituted.
-/
open Fin Function Finset Set
universe uR uS uι v v' v₁ v₂ v₃
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS} {ι : Type uι} {n : ℕ}
{M : Fin n.succ → Type v} {M₁ : ι → Type v₁} {M₂ : Type v₂} {M₃ : Type v₃} {M' : Type v'}
-- Don't generate injectivity lemmas, which the `simpNF` linter will time out on.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- Multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules
over `R`. -/
structure MultilinearMap (R : Type uR) {ι : Type uι} (M₁ : ι → Type v₁) (M₂ : Type v₂) [Semiring R]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] where
/-- The underlying multivariate function of a multilinear map. -/
toFun : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂
/-- A multilinear map is additive in every argument. -/
map_update_add' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (x + y)) = toFun (update m i x) + toFun (update m i y)
/-- A multilinear map is compatible with scalar multiplication in every argument. -/
map_update_smul' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (c • x)) = c • toFun (update m i x)
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[Module R M₃] [Module R M'] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : FunLike (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; cases h; rfl
initialize_simps_projections MultilinearMap (toFun → apply)
/-- Constructor for `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` when the
index type `ι` is already endowed with a `DecidableEq` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' [DecidableEq ι] (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂)
(h₁ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) := by aesop)
(h₂ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) := by aesop) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' m i x y := by convert h₁ m i x y
map_update_smul' m i c x := by convert h₂ m i c x
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) (h₁ h₂) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (h : f = g) (x : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
nonrec theorem congr_arg (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {x y : ∀ i, M₁ i} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} : (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add' := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
/-- Earlier, this name was used by what is now called `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul_left`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul' := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 := by
classical
have : (0 : R) • (0 : M₁ i) = 0 := by simp
rw [← update_eq_self i m, h, ← this, f.map_update_smul, zero_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_update_zero [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ Set.univ := Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty ι
exact map_coord_zero f i rfl
instance : Add (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' =>
⟨fun x => f x + f' x, fun m i x y => by simp [add_left_comm, add_assoc], fun m i c x => by
simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
instance : Zero (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 0, fun _ _ _ _ => by simp, fun _ _ c _ => by simp⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [DistribSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
instance : SMul S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f =>
⟨fun m => c • f m, fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add], fun l i x d => by
simp [← smul_comm x c (_ : M₂)]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (c : S) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
theorem coe_smul (c : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ⇑(c • f) = c • (⇑ f) := rfl
end SMul
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Coercion of a multilinear map to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def coeAddMonoidHom : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ (((i : ι) → M₁ i) → M₂) where
toFun := DFunLike.coe; map_zero' := rfl; map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(f a) :=
map_sum coeAddMonoidHom f s
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) {s : Finset α} :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m := by simp
/-- If `f` is a multilinear map, then `f.toLinearMap m i` is the linear map obtained by fixing all
coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the `i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps]
def toLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun x := f (update m i x)
map_add' x y := by simp
map_smul' c x := by simp
/-- The cartesian product of two multilinear maps, as a multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun m := (f m, g m)
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
/-- Combine a family of multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
@[simps]
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, MultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : MultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun m i := f i m
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_add _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_smul _ _ _ _
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- Equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃` and one-multilinear maps. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f (x i)
map_update_add' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton]
map_update_smul' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f fun _ ↦ x
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_add 0 i x y
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_smul 0 i c x }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext x; refine congr_arg f ?_; exact (eq_const_of_subsingleton _ _).symm
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := Function.const _ m
map_update_add' _ := isEmptyElim
map_update_smul' _ := isEmptyElim
end
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset `s` of `k`
of these variables, one gets a new multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying these variables, and fixing
the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by `f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit identification between `Fin k` and `s` that
we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => M') M₂) (s : Finset (Fin n))
(hk : #s = k) (z : M') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin k => M') M₂ where
toFun v := f fun j => if h : j ∈ s then v ((s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm ⟨j, h⟩) else z
/- Porting note: The proofs of the following two lemmas used to only use `erw` followed by `simp`,
but it seems `erw` no longer unfolds or unifies well enough to work without more help. -/
map_update_add' v i x y := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
map_update_smul' v i c x := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `snoc`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (x y : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (x + y)) = f (snoc m x) + f (snoc m y) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_snoc_last]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (c : R)
(x : M (last n)) : f (snoc m (c • x)) = c • f (snoc m x) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_snoc_last]
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)]
variable {M₁'' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁'' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁'' i)]
/-- If `g` is a multilinear map and `f` is a collection of linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a multilinear map, that we call
`g.compLinearMap f`. -/
def compLinearMap (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun m := g fun i => f i (m i)
map_update_add' m i x y := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_apply (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : g.compLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i (m i) :=
rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map twice with a linear map in each argument is
the same as composing with their composition. -/
theorem compLinearMap_assoc (g : MultilinearMap R M₁'' M₂) (f₁ : ∀ i, M₁' i →ₗ[R] M₁'' i)
(f₂ : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap f₁).compLinearMap f₂ = g.compLinearMap fun i => f₁ i ∘ₗ f₂ i :=
rfl
/-- Composing the zero multilinear map with a linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_compLinearMap (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(0 : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂).compLinearMap f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map with the identity linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_id (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) :
(g.compLinearMap fun _ => LinearMap.id) = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing with a family of surjective linear maps is injective. -/
theorem compLinearMap_injective (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) :
Injective fun g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ => g.compLinearMap f := fun g₁ g₂ h =>
ext fun x => by
simpa [fun i => surjInv_eq (hf i)]
using MultilinearMap.ext_iff.mp h fun i => surjInv (hf i) (x i)
theorem compLinearMap_inj (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i))
(g₁ g₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) : g₁.compLinearMap f = g₂.compLinearMap f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
(compLinearMap_injective _ hf).eq_iff
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear equiv on each argument gives the zero map
if and only if the multilinear map is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem comp_linearEquiv_eq_zero_iff (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i ≃ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)) = 0 ↔ g = 0 := by
set f' := fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
rw [← zero_compLinearMap f', compLinearMap_inj f' fun i => (f i).surjective]
end
/-- If one adds to a vector `m'` another vector `m`, but only for coordinates in a finset `t`, then
the image under a multilinear map `f` is the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` along all subsets `s` of
`t`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when `t = univ`, given in
`map_add_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not require the index set `ι`
to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
revert m'
refine Finset.induction_on t (by simp) ?_
intro i t hit Hrec m'
have A : (insert i t).piecewise (m + m') m' = update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i + m' i) :=
t.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m' i) = t.piecewise (m + m') m' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [hit]
· simp [h]
let m'' := update m' i (m i)
have C : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i) = t.piecewise (m + m'') m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ t <;> simp [m'', h, hit, h']
rw [A, f.map_update_add, B, C, Finset.sum_powerset_insert hit, Hrec, Hrec, add_comm (_ : M₂)]
congr 1
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun s hs => ?_
have : (insert i s).piecewise m m' = s.piecewise m m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', Finset.not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem hs hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [m'', h, h']
rw [this]
/-- Additivity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
simpa using f.map_piecewise_add m m' Finset.univ
section ApplySum
variable {α : ι → Type*} (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
open Fintype Finset
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. Here, we give an auxiliary statement tailored for an inductive proof. Use instead
`map_sum_finset`. -/
theorem map_sum_finset_aux [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ} (h : (∑ i, #(A i)) = n) :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
letI := fun i => Classical.decEq (α i)
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing A with | h n IH =>
-- If one of the sets is empty, then all the sums are zero
by_cases Ai_empty : ∃ i, A i = ∅
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j = 0 := Ai_empty.imp fun i hi ↦ by simp [hi]
have hpi : piFinset A = ∅ := by simpa
rw [f.map_coord_zero i hi, hpi, Finset.sum_empty]
push_neg at Ai_empty
-- Otherwise, if all sets are at most singletons, then they are exactly singletons and the result
-- is again straightforward
by_cases Ai_singleton : ∀ i, #(A i) ≤ 1
· have Ai_card : ∀ i, #(A i) = 1 := by
intro i
have pos : #(A i) ≠ 0 := by simp [Finset.card_eq_zero, Ai_empty i]
have : #(A i) ≤ 1 := Ai_singleton i
exact le_antisymm this (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (_root_.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr pos))
have :
∀ r : ∀ i, α i, r ∈ piFinset A → (f fun i => g i (r i)) = f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j := by
intro r hr
congr with i
have : ∀ j ∈ A i, g i j = g i (r i) := by
intro j hj
congr
apply Finset.card_le_one_iff.1 (Ai_singleton i) hj
exact mem_piFinset.mp hr i
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.sum_const, Ai_card i, one_nsmul]
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Ai_card, card_piFinset, prod_const_one, one_nsmul,
Finset.sum_const]
-- Remains the interesting case where one of the `A i`, say `A i₀`, has cardinality at least 2.
-- We will split into two parts `B i₀` and `C i₀` of smaller cardinality, let `B i = C i = A i`
-- for `i ≠ i₀`, apply the inductive assumption to `B` and `C`, and add up the corresponding
-- parts to get the sum for `A`.
push_neg at Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ : ∃ i, 1 < #(A i) := Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨j₁, j₂, _, hj₂, _⟩ : ∃ j₁ j₂, j₁ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₂ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₁ ≠ j₂ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.1 hi₀
let B := Function.update A i₀ (A i₀ \ {j₂})
let C := Function.update A i₀ {j₂}
have B_subset_A : ∀ i, B i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [B, sdiff_subset, update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
have C_subset_A : ∀ i, C i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [C, hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
-- split the sum at `i₀` as the sum over `B i₀` plus the sum over `C i₀`, to use additivity.
have A_eq_BC :
(fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) =
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀
((∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) + ∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi, update_self]
have : A i₀ = B i₀ ∪ C i₀ := by
simp only [B, C, Function.update_self, Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
symm
simp only [hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.union_eq_left]
rw [this]
refine Finset.sum_union <| Finset.disjoint_right.2 fun j hj => ?_
have : j = j₂ := by
simpa [C] using hj
rw [this]
simp only [B, mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, not_false_iff, Finset.mem_singleton,
update_self, and_false]
· simp [hi]
have Beq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ B i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
have Ceq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ C i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- Express the inductive assumption for `B`
have Brec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ B i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset B, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : ∑ i, #(B i) < ∑ i, #(A i) := by
refine sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => card_le_card (B_subset_A i)) ⟨i₀, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
have : {j₂} ⊆ A i₀ := by simp [hj₂]
simp only [B, Finset.card_sdiff this, Function.update_self, Finset.card_singleton]
exact Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one hi₀))
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this B rfl
-- Express the inductive assumption for `C`
have Crec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ C i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset C, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : (∑ i, #(C i)) < ∑ i, #(A i) :=
Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => Finset.card_le_card (C_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp [C, hi₀]⟩
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this C rfl
have D : Disjoint (piFinset B) (piFinset C) :=
haveI : Disjoint (B i₀) (C i₀) := by simp [B, C]
piFinset_disjoint_of_disjoint B C this
have pi_BC : piFinset A = piFinset B ∪ piFinset C := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm
· intro r hr
by_cases hri₀ : r i₀ = j₂
· apply Finset.mem_union_right
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ C i₀ := by simp [C, hri₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [C, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· apply Finset.mem_union_left
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ B i₀ := by simp [B, hri₀, mem_piFinset.1 hr i₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [B, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· exact
Finset.union_subset (piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => B_subset_A i)
(piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => C_subset_A i)
rw [A_eq_BC]
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, Beq, Ceq, Brec, Crec, pi_BC]
rw [← Finset.sum_union D]
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset_aux _ _ rfl
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset g fun _ => Finset.univ
theorem map_update_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (t : Finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M₁ i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f (update m i (∑ a ∈ t, g a)) = ∑ a ∈ t, f (update m i (g a)) := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, ih]
end ApplySum
/-- Restrict the codomain of a multilinear map to a submodule.
This is the multilinear version of `LinearMap.codRestrict`. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ p where
toFun v := ⟨f v, h v⟩
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_add _ _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_smul _ _ _ _ _
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' := f.map_update_add
map_update_smul' m i := (f.toLinearMap m i).map_smul_of_tower
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
section
variable {ι₁ ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
/-- Transfer the arguments to a map along an equivalence between argument indices.
The naming is derived from `Finsupp.domCongr`, noting that here the permutation applies to the
domain of the domain. -/
@[simps apply]
def domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun v := m fun i => v (σ i)
map_update_add' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_smul]
theorem domDomCongr_trans (σ₁ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (σ₂ : ι₂ ≃ ι₃)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₁.trans σ₂) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
theorem domDomCongr_mul (σ₁ : Equiv.Perm ι₁) (σ₂ : Equiv.Perm ι₁)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₂ * σ₁) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as an equivalence.
This is declared separately because it does not work with dot notation. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrEquiv (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
right_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
/-- The results of applying `domDomCongr` to two maps are equal if
and only if those maps are. -/
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_iff (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (f g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
f.domDomCongr σ = g.domDomCongr σ ↔ f = g :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : _ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ => M₂) M₃).apply_eq_iff_eq
end
/-! If `{a // P a}` is a subtype of `ι` and if we fix an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`,
then a multilinear map on `M₁` defines a multilinear map on the restriction of `M₁` to
`{a // P a}`, by fixing the arguments out of `{a // P a}` equal to the values of `z`. -/
lemma domDomRestrict_aux {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then Function.update x i c ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h, Function.update_self]
simp only [i.2, update_self, dite_true]
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h]
by_cases h' : P j
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_true]
have h'' : ¬ ⟨j, h'⟩ = i :=
fun he => by apply_fun (fun x => x.1) at he; exact h he
rw [Function.update_of_ne h'']
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_false]
lemma domDomRestrict_aux_right {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // ¬ P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else Function.update z i c ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
simpa only [dite_not] using domDomRestrict_aux _ z (fun j ↦ x ⟨j.1, not_not.mp j.2⟩) i c
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `(i : ι) → M i`, a (decidable) predicate `P` on `ι` and
an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`, construct a multilinear map on
`(i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i)` whose value at `x` is `f` evaluated at the vector with `i`th coordinate
`x i` if `P i` and `z i` otherwise.
The naming is similar to `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`: here we are applying the restriction to the
domain of the domain.
For a linear map version, see `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrictₗ`.
-/
def domDomRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
(z : (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂ where
toFun x := f (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩)
map_update_add' x i a b := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' z i c a := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul]
@[simp]
lemma domDomRestrict_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred P] (x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
f.domDomRestrict P z x = f (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) := rfl
-- TODO: Should add a ref here when available.
/-- The "derivative" of a multilinear map, as a linear map from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`.
For continuous multilinear maps, this will indeed be the derivative. -/
def linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) : ((i : ι) → M₁ i) →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
∑ i : ι, (f.toLinearMap x i).comp (LinearMap.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x y : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_proj, Finset.sum_apply,
Function.comp_apply, Function.eval, toLinearMap_apply]
end Semiring
end MultilinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear map gives again a multilinear map. -/
def compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g ∘ f
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
⇑(g.compMultilinearMap f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_apply (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compMultilinearMap f m = g (f m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_zero (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
g.compMultilinearMap (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = 0 :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_zero g
@[simp]
theorem zero_compMultilinearMap (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).compMultilinearMap f = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_add (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (f₁ + f₂) = g.compMultilinearMap f₁ + g.compMultilinearMap f₂ :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_add g _ _
@[simp]
theorem add_compMultilinearMap (g₁ g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).compMultilinearMap f = g₁.compMultilinearMap f + g₂.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_smul [DistribSMul S M₂] [DistribSMul S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (s • f) = s • g.compMultilinearMap f :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => g.map_smul_of_tower _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul_compMultilinearMap [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(s • g).compMultilinearMap f = s • g.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.subtype_comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem subtype_compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(h) : p.subtype.compMultilinearMap (f.codRestrict p h) = f :=
rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(p : Submodule R M₃) (h) :
(g.codRestrict p h).compMultilinearMap f =
(g.compMultilinearMap f).codRestrict p fun v => h (f v) :=
rfl
variable {ι₁ ι₂ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M') M₂) :
(g.compMultilinearMap f).domDomCongr σ = g.compMultilinearMap (f.domDomCongr σ) := by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr]
end LinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [(i : ι) → AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [(i : ι) → Module R (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [Module R M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] :
DistribMulAction S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.distribMulAction coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
section Module
variable [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.module _ coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors S M₂] : NoZeroSMulDivisors S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ rfl coe_smul
variable [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module S M₃] [Module R M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
variable (S) in
/-- `LinearMap.compMultilinearMap` as an `S`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.LinearMap.compMultilinearMapₗ [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g.compMultilinearMap
map_add' := g.compMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := g.compMultilinearMap_smul
variable (R S M₁ M₂ M₃)
section OfSubsingleton
/-- Linear equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃`
and one-multilinear maps `MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def ofSubsingletonₗ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ :=
{ ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
end OfSubsingleton
/-- The dependent version of `MultilinearMap.domDomCongrLinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv' {ι' : Type*} (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun i => M₁ (σ.symm i)) M₂ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ (σ.piCongrLeft' M₁).symm
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_smul] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ σ.piCongrLeft' M₁
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_smul] }
map_add' f₁ f₂ := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
left_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The space of constant maps is equivalent to the space of maps that are multilinear with respect
to an empty family. -/
@[simps]
def constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f := f 0
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := ext fun _ => MultilinearMap.congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv {ι₁ ι₂} (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ :=
{ (domDomCongrEquiv σ :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃) with
map_smul' := fun c f => by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr] }
end Module
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [Π i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [Π i, Module R (M₁' i)]
/-- Given a predicate `P`, one may associate to a multilinear map `f` a multilinear map
from the elements satisfying `P` to the multilinear maps on elements not satisfying `P`.
In other words, splitting the variables into two subsets one gets a multilinear map into
multilinear maps.
This is a linear map version of the function `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrict`. -/
def domDomRestrictₗ (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) => M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦ domDomRestrict f P z
map_update_add' := by
intro h m i x y
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
map_update_smul' := by
intro h m i c x
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
lemma iteratedFDeriv_aux {ι} {M₁ : ι → Type*} {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
(s : Set ι) [DecidableEq { x // x ∈ s }] (e : α ≃ s)
(m : α → ((i : ι) → M₁ i)) (a : α) (z : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
(fun i ↦ update m a z (e.symm i) i) =
(fun i ↦ update (fun j ↦ m (e.symm j) j) (e a) (z (e a)) i) := by
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne a (e.symm i) with rfl | hne
· rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply e i, update_self, update_self]
· rw [update_of_ne hne.symm, update_of_ne fun h ↦ (Equiv.symm_apply_apply .. ▸ h ▸ hne) rfl]
/-- One of the components of the iterated derivative of a multilinear map. Given a bijection `e`
between a type `α` (typically `Fin k`) and a subset `s` of `ι`, this component is a multilinear map
of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ`, mapping them to `f (x₁, (v_{e.symm 2})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at
indices `i` in `s` one uses the `i`-th coordinate of the vector `v_{e.symm i}` and otherwise one
uses the `i`-th coordinate of a reference vector `x`.
This is multilinear in the components of `x` outside of `s`, and in the `v_j`. -/
noncomputable def iteratedFDerivComponent {α : Type*}
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {s : Set ι} (e : α ≃ s) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // a ∉ s}) ↦ M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : α) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦
{ toFun := fun v ↦ domDomRestrictₗ f (fun i ↦ i ∈ s) z (fun i ↦ v (e.symm i) i)
map_update_add' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux]
map_update_smul' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux] }
map_update_add' := by intros; ext; simp
map_update_smul' := by intros; ext; simp
open Classical in
/-- The `k`-th iterated derivative of a multilinear map `f` at the point `x`. It is a multilinear
map of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ` (with the same type as `x`), mapping them
to `∑ f (x₁, (v_{i₁})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at each index `j` one uses either `xⱼ` or one
of the `(vᵢ)ⱼ`, and each `vᵢ` has to be used exactly once.
The sum is parameterized by the embeddings of `Fin k` in the index type `ι` (or, equivalently,
by the subsets `s` of `ι` of cardinality `k` and then the bijections between `Fin k` and `s`).
For the continuous version, see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv`. -/
protected noncomputable def iteratedFDeriv [Fintype ι]
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (k : ℕ) (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : Fin k) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂ :=
∑ e : Fin k ↪ ι, iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange (fun i ↦ x i)
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapₗ (f : Π (i : ι), M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := fun g ↦ g.compLinearMap f
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g` and multilinear in
`f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapMultilinear :
@MultilinearMap R ι (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
((MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) _ _ _
(fun _ ↦ LinearMap.module) _ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.compLinearMapₗ
map_update_add' := by
intro _ f i f₁ f₂
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (f₁ + f₂) j <| x j) =
(g fun j ↦ update f i f₁ j <|x j) + g fun j ↦ update f i f₂ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (f₁ + f₂) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₁ j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₂ j
map_update_smul' := by
intro _ f i a f₀
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (a • f₀) j <| x j) = a • g fun j ↦ update f i f₀ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (a • f₀) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₀ j
/--
Let `M₁ᵢ` and `M₁ᵢ'` be two families of `R`-modules and `M₂` an `R`-module.
Let us denote `Π i, M₁ᵢ` and `Π i, M₁ᵢ'` by `M` and `M'` respectively.
If `g` is a multilinear map `M' → M₂`, then `g` can be reinterpreted as a multilinear
map from `Π i, M₁ᵢ ⟶ M₁ᵢ'` to `M ⟶ M₂` via `(fᵢ) ↦ v ↦ g(fᵢ vᵢ)`.
-/
@[simps!] def piLinearMap :
MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ →ₗ[R]
MultilinearMap R (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) where
toFun g := (LinearMap.applyₗ g).compMultilinearMap compLinearMapMultilinear
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
end
/-- If one multiplies by `c i` the coordinates in a finset `s`, then the image under a multilinear
map is multiplied by `∏ i ∈ s, c i`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when
`s = univ`, given in `map_smul_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not
require the index set `ι` to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m := by
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro j s j_not_mem_s Hrec
have A :
Function.update (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) j (m j) =
s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· rw [h]
simp [j_not_mem_s]
· simp [h]
rw [s.piecewise_insert, f.map_update_smul, A, Hrec]
simp [j_not_mem_s, mul_smul]
/-- Multiplicativity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m := by
classical simpa using map_piecewise_smul f c m Finset.univ
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul_left [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update (c • m) i x) = c ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) • f (update m i x) := by
have :
f ((Finset.univ.erase i).piecewise (c • update m i x) (update m i x)) =
(∏ _i ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, c) • f (update m i x) :=
map_piecewise_smul f _ _ _
simpa [← Function.update_smul c m] using this
section
variable (R ι)
variable (A : Type*) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Fintype ι]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebra` is the multilinear map on `A^ι` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin` for a version that works with a non-commutative
algebra `A` but requires `ι = Fin n`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
toFun m := ∏ i, m i
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem, add_mul]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem]
variable {R A ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end
section
variable (R n)
variable (A : Type*) [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebraFin` is the multilinear map on `A^n` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra` for a version that assumes `[CommSemiring A]` but works
for `A^ι` with any finite type `ι`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => A) A :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun m ↦ (List.ofFn m).prod)
(fun m i x y ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, add_mul, this,
mul_add, add_mul])
(fun m i c x ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, this])
variable {R A n}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply_const (a : A) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A fun _ => a) = a ^ n := by simp
end
/-- Given an `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
def smulRight (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ :=
(LinearMap.smulRight LinearMap.id z).compMultilinearMap f
@[simp]
theorem smulRight_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f.smulRight z m = f m • z :=
rfl
variable (R ι)
/-- The canonical multilinear map on `R^ι` when `ι` is finite, associating to `m` the product of
all the `m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module). See also
`mkPiAlgebra` for a more general version. -/
protected def mkPiRing [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ :=
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
variable {R ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) (m : ι → R) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M₂) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f := by
ext m
have : m = fun i => m i • (1 : R) := by
ext j
simp
conv_rhs => rw [this, f.map_smul_univ]
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff [Fintype ι] {z₁ z₂ : M₂} :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔ z₁ = z₂ := by
simp_rw [MultilinearMap.ext_iff, mkPiRing_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using h fun _ => 1
· intro x
simp [h]
theorem mkPiRing_zero [Fintype ι] : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M₂) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, MultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommSemiring
section RangeAddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : Neg (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun m => -f m, fun m i x y => by simp [add_comm], fun m i c x => by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨fun m => f m - g m, fun m i x y => by
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
abel,
fun m i c x => by simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul, smul_sub]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - g) m = f m - g m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
{ MultilinearMap.addCommMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
sub_eq_add_neg := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => sub_eq_add_neg _ _
zsmul := fun n f =>
{ toFun := fun m => n • f m
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add]
map_update_smul' := fun l i x d => by simp [← smul_comm x n (_ : M₂)] }
zsmul_zero' := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_zero' _
zsmul_succ' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_succ' _ _
zsmul_neg' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_neg' _ _ }
end RangeAddCommGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_neg [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (-x)) = -f (update m i x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← MultilinearMap.map_update_add, neg_add_cancel, f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_neg := MultilinearMap.map_update_neg
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, MultilinearMap.map_update_add, map_update_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_sub := MultilinearMap.map_update_sub
lemma map_update [DecidableEq ι] (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (i : ι) (v : M₁ i) :
f (update x i v) = f x - f (update x i (x i - v)) := by
rw [map_update_sub, update_eq_self, sub_sub_cancel]
open Finset in
lemma map_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f a - f (s.piecewise b a) =
∑ i ∈ s, f (fun j ↦ if j ∈ s → j < i then a j else if i = j then a j - b j else b j) := by
refine s.induction_on_min ?_ fun k s hk ih ↦ ?_
· rw [Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_empty, sub_self]
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert, map_update, ← sub_add, ih,
add_comm, sum_insert (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
simp_rw [s.mem_insert]
congr 1
· congr; ext i; split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [update_of_ne, Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
· exact fun h ↦ (hk i h).not_lt (h₁ <| .inr h)
· exact fun h ↦ (h₁ <| .inl h).ne h
· cases h₂
rw [update_self, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
· push_neg at h₁
rw [update_of_ne (Ne.symm h₂), s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ (h₁.1.resolve_left <| Ne.symm h₂)]
· apply sum_congr rfl; intro i hi; congr; ext j; congr 1; apply propext
simp_rw [imp_iff_not_or, not_or]; apply or_congr_left'
intro h; rw [and_iff_right]; rintro rfl; exact h (hk i hi)
/-- This calculates the differences between the values of a multilinear map at
two arguments that differ on a finset `s` of `ι`. It requires a
linear order on `ι` in order to express the result. -/
lemma map_piecewise_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b v : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise a v) - f (s.piecewise b v) = ∑ i ∈ s, f
fun j ↦ if j ∈ s then if j < i then a j else if j = i then a j - b j else b j else v j := by
rw [← s.piecewise_idem_right b a, map_sub_map_piecewise]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg f <| funext fun j ↦ ?_
by_cases hjs : j ∈ s
· rw [if_pos hjs]; by_cases hji : j < i
· rw [if_pos fun _ ↦ hji, if_pos hji, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hjs]
rw [if_neg (Classical.not_imp.mpr ⟨hjs, hji⟩), if_neg hji]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [if_pos rfl, if_pos rfl, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hi]
· rw [if_neg hij, if_neg hij.symm]
· rw [if_neg hjs, if_pos fun h ↦ (hjs h).elim, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ hjs]
open Finset in
lemma map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) = f x + f.linearDeriv x h + ∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, f (s.piecewise h x) := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_univ, ← Finset.powerset_univ,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not _ (2 ≤ #·)]
simp_rw [not_le, Nat.lt_succ, le_iff_lt_or_eq (b := 1), Nat.lt_one_iff, filter_or,
← powersetCard_eq_filter, sum_union (univ.pairwise_disjoint_powersetCard zero_ne_one),
powersetCard_zero, powersetCard_one, sum_singleton, Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_map,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Finset.piecewise_singleton, linearDeriv_apply, add_comm]
open Finset in
/-- This expresses the difference between the values of a multilinear map
at two points "close to `x`" in terms of the "derivative" of the multilinear map at `x`
and of "second-order" terms. -/
lemma map_add_sub_map_add_sub_linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h h' : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) - f (x + h') - f.linearDeriv x (h - h') =
| ∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, (f (s.piecewise h x) - f (s.piecewise h' x)) := by
simp_rw [map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, sub_self, zero_add,
← LinearMap.map_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, sum_sub_distrib]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,341 | 1,343 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
(by simp [IH'])).1
refine ⟨f, A, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
conv_rhs => rw [hf]
rw [seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
apply
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)))) (by simp [A])).2
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
symmetric relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m ≠ n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
[IsSymm α r] (h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ Pairwise (r on f) := by
rcases exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists P r h with ⟨f, hf, hf'⟩
refine ⟨f, hf, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | rfl | h)
· exact hf' m n h
· exact (hmn rfl).elim
· unfold Function.onFun
apply symm
exact hf' n m h
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 1,284 | 1,293 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Defs
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported dependent functions
Let `N : α → Type*` be a type family, assume that `N a` has a `0` for all `a : α` and let
`f g : Π₀ a, N a` be finitely supported dependent functions.
## Main definition
* `DFinsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N a` is an additive group for all `a`, `DFinsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`DFinsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {N : α → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, Zero (N a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : Π₀ a, N a) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x ↦ f x ≠ g x
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } :=
Set.ext fun _x ↦ mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h ↦
ext fun a ↦ not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h ↦ h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
| @[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : Π₀ a, N a).neLocus f = f.support :=
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/NeLocus.lean | 67 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,393 | 1,398 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Preservation of biproducts
We define the image of a (binary) bicone under a functor that preserves zero morphisms and define
classes `PreservesBiproduct` and `PreservesBinaryBiproduct`. We then
* show that a functor that preserves biproducts of a two-element type preserves binary biproducts,
* construct the comparison morphisms between the image of a biproduct and the biproduct of the
images and show that the biproduct is preserved if one of them is an isomorphism,
* give the canonical isomorphism between the image of a biproduct and the biproduct of the images
in case that the biproduct is preserved.
-/
universe w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
namespace Functor
section Map
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁}
/-- The image of a bicone under a functor. -/
@[simps]
def mapBicone {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) : Bicone (F.obj ∘ f) where
pt := F.obj b.pt
π j := F.map (b.π j)
ι j := F.map (b.ι j)
ι_π j j' := by
rw [← F.map_comp]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp only [bicone_ι_π_self, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id, eqToHom_refl]; dsimp
· rw [bicone_ι_π_ne _ h, F.map_zero]
theorem mapBicone_whisker {K : Type w₂} {g : K ≃ J} {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) :
F.mapBicone (c.whisker g) = (F.mapBicone c).whisker g :=
rfl
end Bicone
/-- The image of a binary bicone under a functor. -/
@[simps!]
def mapBinaryBicone {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y) : BinaryBicone (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
(BinaryBicones.functoriality _ _ F).obj b
end Map
end Functor
open CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace Limits
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁} {K : Type w₂}
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of `f` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over `f` to a
bilimit bicone over `F.obj ∘ f`. -/
class PreservesBiproduct (f : J → C) (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {b : Bicone f}, b.IsBilimit → Nonempty (F.mapBicone b).IsBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproduct] PreservesBiproduct.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of `f` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over `f` to a
bilimit bicone over `F.obj ∘ f`. -/
def isBilimitOfPreserves {f : J → C} (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproduct f F]
{b : Bicone f} (hb : b.IsBilimit) : (F.mapBicone b).IsBilimit :=
(PreservesBiproduct.preserves hb).some
variable (J)
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts of shape `J` if it preserves biproducts of `f` for every
`f : J → C`. -/
class PreservesBiproductsOfShape (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {f : J → C}, PreservesBiproduct f F
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproductsOfShape] PreservesBiproductsOfShape.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBiproductsOfShape.preserves
end Bicone
/-- A functor `F` preserves finite biproducts if it preserves biproducts of shape `J`
whenever `J` is a finite type. -/
class PreservesFiniteBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {J : Type} [Finite J], PreservesBiproductsOfShape J F
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesFiniteBiproducts] PreservesFiniteBiproducts.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesFiniteBiproducts.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves biproducts if it preserves biproducts of any shape `J` of size `w`.
The usual notion of preservation of biproducts is recovered by choosing `w` to be the universe
of the morphisms of `C`. -/
class PreservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {J : Type w₁}, PreservesBiproductsOfShape J F
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBiproducts] PreservesBiproducts.preserves
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBiproducts.preserves
/-- Preserving biproducts at a bigger universe level implies preserving biproducts at a
smaller universe level. -/
lemma preservesBiproducts_shrink (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBiproducts.{max w₁ w₂} F] : PreservesBiproducts.{w₁} F :=
⟨fun {_} =>
⟨fun {_} =>
⟨fun {b} ib =>
⟨((F.mapBicone b).whiskerIsBilimitIff _).toFun
(isBilimitOfPreserves F ((b.whiskerIsBilimitIff Equiv.ulift.{w₂}).invFun ib))⟩⟩⟩⟩
instance (priority := 100) preservesFiniteBiproductsOfPreservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproducts.{w₁} F] : PreservesFiniteBiproducts F where
preserves {J} _ := by letI := preservesBiproducts_shrink.{0} F; infer_instance
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts of `X` and `Y` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over
`X` and `Y` to a bilimit bicone over `F.obj X` and `F.obj Y`. -/
class PreservesBinaryBiproduct (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {b : BinaryBicone X Y}, b.IsBilimit → Nonempty ((F.mapBinaryBicone b).IsBilimit)
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBinaryBiproduct] PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts of `X` and `Y` if `F` maps every bilimit bicone over
`X` and `Y` to a bilimit bicone over `F.obj X` and `F.obj Y`. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfPreserves {X Y : C} (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F] {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (hb : b.IsBilimit) :
(F.mapBinaryBicone b).IsBilimit :=
(PreservesBinaryBiproduct.preserves hb).some
/-- A functor `F` preserves binary biproducts if it preserves the binary biproduct of `X` and `Y`
for all `X` and `Y`. -/
class PreservesBinaryBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C}, PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F := by infer_instance
attribute [inherit_doc PreservesBinaryBiproducts] PreservesBinaryBiproducts.preserves
/-- A functor that preserves biproducts of a pair preserves binary biproducts. -/
lemma preservesBinaryBiproduct_of_preservesBiproduct (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesZeroMorphisms F] (X Y : C) [PreservesBiproduct (pairFunction X Y) F] :
PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F where
preserves {b} hb := ⟨{
isLimit :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit
((IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoPair _) _).symm
(isBilimitOfPreserves F (b.toBiconeIsBilimit.symm hb)).isLimit) <|
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
isColimit :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit
((IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (diagramIsoPair _) _).symm
(isBilimitOfPreserves F (b.toBiconeIsBilimit.symm hb)).isColimit) <|
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }⟩
/-- A functor that preserves biproducts of a pair preserves binary biproducts. -/
lemma preservesBinaryBiproducts_of_preservesBiproducts (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
[PreservesBiproductsOfShape WalkingPair F] : PreservesBinaryBiproducts F where
preserves {X} Y := preservesBinaryBiproduct_of_preservesBiproduct F X Y
attribute [instance 100] PreservesBinaryBiproducts.preserves
end Limits
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace Functor
section Bicone
variable {J : Type w₁} (F : C ⥤ D) (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f]
section
variable [HasBiproduct (F.obj ∘ f)]
/-- As for products, any functor between categories with biproducts gives rise to a morphism
`F.obj (⨁ f) ⟶ ⨁ (F.obj ∘ f)`. -/
def biproductComparison : F.obj (⨁ f) ⟶ ⨁ F.obj ∘ f :=
biproduct.lift fun j => F.map (biproduct.π f j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproductComparison_π (j : J) :
biproductComparison F f ≫ biproduct.π _ j = F.map (biproduct.π f j) :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
/-- As for coproducts, any functor between categories with biproducts gives rise to a morphism
`⨁ (F.obj ∘ f) ⟶ F.obj (⨁ f)` -/
def biproductComparison' : ⨁ F.obj ∘ f ⟶ F.obj (⨁ f) :=
biproduct.desc fun j => F.map (biproduct.ι f j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_biproductComparison' (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ biproductComparison' F f = F.map (biproduct.ι f j) :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- The composition in the opposite direction is equal to the identity if and only if `F` preserves
the biproduct, see `preservesBiproduct_of_monoBiproductComparison`. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproductComparison'_comp_biproductComparison :
biproductComparison' F f ≫ biproductComparison F f = 𝟙 (⨁ F.obj ∘ f) := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, ← Functor.map_comp, eqToHom_map]
/-- `biproduct_comparison F f` is a split epimorphism. -/
@[simps]
def splitEpiBiproductComparison : SplitEpi (biproductComparison F f) where
section_ := biproductComparison' F f
id := by simp
instance : IsSplitEpi (biproductComparison F f) :=
IsSplitEpi.mk' (splitEpiBiproductComparison F f)
/-- `biproduct_comparison' F f` is a split monomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def splitMonoBiproductComparison' : SplitMono (biproductComparison' F f) where
retraction := biproductComparison F f
id := by simp
instance : IsSplitMono (biproductComparison' F f) :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (splitMonoBiproductComparison' F f)
end
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBiproduct f F]
instance hasBiproduct_of_preserves : HasBiproduct (F.obj ∘ f) :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := F.mapBicone (biproduct.bicone f)
isBilimit := isBilimitOfPreserves _ (biproduct.isBilimit _) }
/-- If `F` preserves a biproduct, we get a definitionally nice isomorphism
`F.obj (⨁ f) ≅ ⨁ (F.obj ∘ f)`. -/
abbrev mapBiproduct : F.obj (⨁ f) ≅ ⨁ F.obj ∘ f :=
biproduct.uniqueUpToIso _ (isBilimitOfPreserves _ (biproduct.isBilimit _))
theorem mapBiproduct_hom :
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
(mapBiproduct F f).hom = biproduct.lift fun j => F.map (biproduct.π f j) := rfl
theorem mapBiproduct_inv :
haveI : HasBiproduct fun j => F.obj (f j) := hasBiproduct_of_preserves F f
(mapBiproduct F f).inv = biproduct.desc fun j => F.map (biproduct.ι f j) := rfl
end Bicone
variable (F : C ⥤ D) (X Y : C) [HasBinaryBiproduct X Y]
section
variable [HasBinaryBiproduct (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)]
/-- As for products, any functor between categories with binary biproducts gives rise to a
morphism `F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y`. -/
def biprodComparison : F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y :=
biprod.lift (F.map biprod.fst) (F.map biprod.snd)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison_fst : biprodComparison F X Y ≫ biprod.fst = F.map biprod.fst :=
biprod.lift_fst _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison_snd : biprodComparison F X Y ≫ biprod.snd = F.map biprod.snd :=
biprod.lift_snd _ _
/-- As for coproducts, any functor between categories with binary biproducts gives rise to a
morphism `F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊞ Y)`. -/
def biprodComparison' : F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊞ Y) :=
biprod.desc (F.map biprod.inl) (F.map biprod.inr)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_biprodComparison' : biprod.inl ≫ biprodComparison' F X Y = F.map biprod.inl :=
biprod.inl_desc _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_biprodComparison' : biprod.inr ≫ biprodComparison' F X Y = F.map biprod.inr :=
biprod.inr_desc _ _
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- The composition in the opposite direction is equal to the identity if and only if `F` preserves
the biproduct, see `preservesBinaryBiproduct_of_monoBiprodComparison`. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprodComparison'_comp_biprodComparison :
biprodComparison' F X Y ≫ biprodComparison F X Y = 𝟙 (F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y) := by
ext <;> simp [← Functor.map_comp]
/-- `biprodComparison F X Y` is a split epi. -/
@[simps]
def splitEpiBiprodComparison : SplitEpi (biprodComparison F X Y) where
section_ := biprodComparison' F X Y
id := by simp
instance : IsSplitEpi (biprodComparison F X Y) :=
IsSplitEpi.mk' (splitEpiBiprodComparison F X Y)
/-- `biprodComparison' F X Y` is a split mono. -/
@[simps]
def splitMonoBiprodComparison' : SplitMono (biprodComparison' F X Y) where
retraction := biprodComparison F X Y
id := by simp
instance : IsSplitMono (biprodComparison' F X Y) :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (splitMonoBiprodComparison' F X Y)
end
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] [PreservesBinaryBiproduct X Y F]
instance hasBinaryBiproduct_of_preserves : HasBinaryBiproduct (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := F.mapBinaryBicone (BinaryBiproduct.bicone X Y)
isBilimit := isBinaryBilimitOfPreserves F (BinaryBiproduct.isBilimit _ _) }
/-- If `F` preserves a binary biproduct, we get a definitionally nice isomorphism
`F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ≅ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y`. -/
abbrev mapBiprod : F.obj (X ⊞ Y) ≅ F.obj X ⊞ F.obj Y :=
biprod.uniqueUpToIso _ _ (isBinaryBilimitOfPreserves F (BinaryBiproduct.isBilimit _ _))
|
theorem mapBiprod_hom : (mapBiprod F X Y).hom = biprod.lift (F.map biprod.fst) (F.map biprod.snd) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 349 | 351 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
|
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 595 | 599 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c)
(hc' : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < cof c) (hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} (ha : a < c) :
nfpFamily f a < c := by
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift ((Cardinal.lift_le.2 (mk_list_le_max ι)).trans_lt ?_) fun l => ?_
· rw [lift_max]
apply max_lt _ hc'
rwa [Cardinal.lift_aleph0]
· induction' l with i l H
· exact ha
· exact hf _ _ H
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hc' : #ι < cof c)
(hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} : a < c → nfpFamily.{u, u} f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id]) hf
theorem nfp_lt_ord {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hf : ∀ i < c, f i < c) {a} :
a < c → nfp f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by simpa using Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0.trans hc) fun _ => hf
theorem exists_blsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ f : ∀ a < (cof o).ord, Ordinal, blsub.{u, u} _ f = o := by
rcases exists_lsub_cof o with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
rw [← hι, hι']
exact ⟨_, hf⟩
theorem le_cof_iff_blsub {b : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof b ↔ ∀ {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), blsub.{u, u} o f = b → a ≤ o.card :=
le_cof_iff_lsub.trans
⟨fun H o f hf => by simpa using H _ hf, fun H ι f hf => by
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
simpa using H _ hf⟩
theorem cof_blsub_le_lift {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) :
cof (blsub.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← mk_toType o]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift _
theorem cof_blsub_le {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : cof (blsub.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift f
theorem blsub_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, v} o f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (blsub_le hf) fun h =>
ho.not_le (by simpa [← iSup_ord, hf, h] using cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f)
theorem blsub_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, u} o f < c :=
blsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id]) hf
theorem cof_bsup_le_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} (H : ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, v} o f) :
cof (bsup.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f
theorem cof_bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, u} o f) → cof (bsup.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_bsup_le_lift
theorem bsup_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : bsup.{u, v} o f < c :=
(bsup_le_blsub f).trans_lt (blsub_lt_ord_lift ho hf)
theorem bsup_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof) :
(∀ i hi, f i hi < c) → bsup.{u, u} o f < c :=
bsup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id])
/-! ### Basic results -/
@[simp]
theorem cof_zero : cof 0 = 0 := by
refine LE.le.antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.zero_le _)
rw [← card_zero]
exact cof_le_card 0
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_zero {o} : cof o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨inductionOn o fun _ r _ z =>
let ⟨_, hl, e⟩ := cof_eq r
type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty.2 <|
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨_, h, _⟩ := hl a
(mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (e.trans z)).elim' ⟨_, h⟩⟩,
fun e => by simp [e]⟩
theorem cof_ne_zero {o} : cof o ≠ 0 ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
cof_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem cof_succ (o) : cof (succ o) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine inductionOn o fun α r _ => ?_
change cof (type _) ≤ _
rw [← (_ : #_ = 1)]
· apply cof_type_le
refine fun a => ⟨Sum.inr PUnit.unit, Set.mem_singleton _, ?_⟩
rcases a with (a | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> simp [EmptyRelation]
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Set.card_singleton]
simp
· rw [← Cardinal.succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Cardinal.zero_le] using fun h =>
succ_ne_zero o (cof_eq_zero.1 (Eq.symm h))
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ {o} : cof.{u} o = 1 ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨inductionOn o fun α r _ z => by
rcases cof_eq r with ⟨S, hl, e⟩; rw [z] at e
obtain ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 (by rw [e]; exact one_ne_zero)
refine
⟨typein r a,
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ fun x y => ?_) fun x => ?_⟩⟩
· apply Sum.rec <;> [exact Subtype.val; exact fun _ => a]
· rcases x with (x | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> rcases y with (y | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;>
simp [Subrel, Order.Preimage, EmptyRelation]
exact x.2
· suffices r x a ∨ ∃ _ : PUnit.{u}, ↑a = x by
convert this
dsimp [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone]; simp
rcases trichotomous_of r x a with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨PUnit.unit, h.symm⟩
· rcases hl x with ⟨a', aS, hn⟩
refine absurd h ?_
convert hn
change (a : α) = ↑(⟨a', aS⟩ : S)
have := le_one_iff_subsingleton.1 (le_of_eq e)
congr!,
fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp [e]⟩
/-! ### Fundamental sequences -/
-- TODO: move stuff about fundamental sequences to their own file.
/-- A fundamental sequence for `a` is an increasing sequence of length `o = cof a` that converges at
`a`. We provide `o` explicitly in order to avoid type rewrites. -/
def IsFundamentalSequence (a o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}) : Prop :=
o ≤ a.cof.ord ∧ (∀ {i j} (hi hj), i < j → f i hi < f j hj) ∧ blsub.{u, u} o f = a
namespace IsFundamentalSequence
variable {a o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}}
protected theorem cof_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : a.cof.ord = o :=
hf.1.antisymm' <| by
rw [← hf.2.2]
exact (ord_le_ord.2 (cof_blsub_le f)).trans (ord_card_le o)
protected theorem strict_mono (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j} :
∀ hi hj, i < j → f i hi < f j hj :=
hf.2.1
theorem blsub_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : blsub.{u, u} o f = a :=
hf.2.2
theorem ord_cof (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) :
IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord fun i hi => f i (hi.trans_le (by rw [hf.cof_eq])) := by
have H := hf.cof_eq
subst H
exact hf
theorem id_of_le_cof (h : o ≤ o.cof.ord) : IsFundamentalSequence o o fun a _ => a :=
⟨h, @fun _ _ _ _ => id, blsub_id o⟩
protected theorem zero {f : ∀ b < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal} : IsFundamentalSequence 0 0 f :=
⟨by rw [cof_zero, ord_zero], @fun i _ hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim, blsub_zero f⟩
protected theorem succ : IsFundamentalSequence (succ o) 1 fun _ _ => o := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j hi hj h => ?_, blsub_const Ordinal.one_ne_zero o⟩
· rw [cof_succ, ord_one]
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at hi hj
rw [hi, hj] at h
exact h.false.elim
protected theorem monotone (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j : Ordinal} (hi : i < o)
(hj : j < o) (hij : i ≤ j) : f i hi ≤ f j hj := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hij with (hij | rfl)
· exact (hf.2.1 hi hj hij).le
· rfl
theorem trans {a o o' : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f)
{g : ∀ b < o', Ordinal.{u}} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence o o' g) :
IsFundamentalSequence a o' fun i hi =>
f (g i hi) (by rw [← hg.2.2]; apply lt_blsub) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.2.1 _ _ (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rw [hf.cof_eq]
exact hg.1.trans (ord_cof_le o)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} o _ f (@IsFundamentalSequence.monotone _ _ f hf)]
· exact hf.2.2
· exact hg.2.2
protected theorem lt {a o : Ordinal} {s : Π p < o, Ordinal}
(h : IsFundamentalSequence a o s) {p : Ordinal} (hp : p < o) : s p hp < a :=
h.blsub_eq ▸ lt_blsub s p hp
end IsFundamentalSequence
/-- Every ordinal has a fundamental sequence. -/
theorem exists_fundamental_sequence (a : Ordinal.{u}) :
∃ f, IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord f := by
suffices h : ∃ o f, IsFundamentalSequence a o f by
rcases h with ⟨o, f, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.ord_cof⟩
rcases exists_lsub_cof a with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases ord_eq ι with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
let r' := Subrel r fun i ↦ ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
let hrr' : r' ↪r r := Subrel.relEmbedding _ _
haveI := hrr'.isWellOrder
refine
⟨_, _, hrr'.ordinal_type_le.trans ?_, @fun i j _ h _ => (enum r' ⟨j, h⟩).prop _ ?_,
le_antisymm (blsub_le fun i hi => lsub_le_iff.1 hf.le _) ?_⟩
· rw [← hι, hr]
· change r (hrr'.1 _) (hrr'.1 _)
rwa [hrr'.2, @enum_lt_enum _ r']
· rw [← hf, lsub_le_iff]
intro i
suffices h : ∃ i' hi', f i ≤ bfamilyOfFamily' r' (fun i => f i) i' hi' by
rcases h with ⟨i', hi', hfg⟩
exact hfg.trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ _)
by_cases h : ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
· refine ⟨typein r' ⟨i, h⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
rw [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
· push_neg at h
obtain ⟨hji, hij⟩ := wo.wf.min_mem _ h
refine ⟨typein r' ⟨_, fun k hkj => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hij⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
· by_contra! H
exact (wo.wf.not_lt_min _ h ⟨IsTrans.trans _ _ _ hkj hji, H⟩) hkj
· rwa [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
@[simp]
theorem cof_cof (a : Ordinal.{u}) : cof (cof a).ord = cof a := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a.cof.ord
exact ord_injective (hf.trans hg).cof_eq.symm
protected theorem IsNormal.isFundamentalSequence {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsNormal f)
{a o} (ha : IsLimit a) {g} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence a o g) :
IsFundamentalSequence (f a) o fun b hb => f (g b hb) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rcases exists_lsub_cof (f a) with ⟨ι, f', hf', hι⟩
rw [← hg.cof_eq, ord_le_ord, ← hι]
suffices (lsub.{u, u} fun i => sInf { b : Ordinal | f' i ≤ f b }) = a by
rw [← this]
apply cof_lsub_le
have H : ∀ i, ∃ b < a, f' i ≤ f b := fun i => by
have := lt_lsub.{u, u} f' i
rw [hf', ← IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha, lt_blsub_iff] at this
simpa using this
refine (lsub_le fun i => ?_).antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun b hb => ?_)
· rcases H i with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (csInf_le' hb') hb
· have := hf.strictMono hb
rw [← hf', lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
rcases H i with ⟨b, _, hb⟩
exact
((le_csInf_iff'' ⟨b, by exact hb⟩).2 fun c hc =>
hf.strictMono.le_iff_le.1 (hi.trans hc)).trans_lt (lt_lsub _ i)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} a _ (fun b _ => f b) (@fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono.monotone h) g
hg.2.2]
exact IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha
theorem IsNormal.cof_eq {f} (hf : IsNormal f) {a} (ha : IsLimit a) : cof (f a) = cof a :=
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
ord_injective (hf.isFundamentalSequence ha hg).cof_eq
theorem IsNormal.cof_le {f} (hf : IsNormal f) (a) : cof a ≤ cof (f a) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit a with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | ha)
· rw [cof_zero]
exact zero_le _
· rw [cof_succ, Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero, cof_ne_zero, ← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact (Ordinal.zero_le (f b)).trans_lt (hf.1 b)
· rw [hf.cof_eq ha]
@[simp]
theorem cof_add (a b : Ordinal) : b ≠ 0 → cof (a + b) = cof b := fun h => by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨c, rfl⟩ | hb)
· contradiction
· rw [add_succ, cof_succ, cof_succ]
· exact (isNormal_add_right a).cof_eq hb
theorem aleph0_le_cof {o} : ℵ₀ ≤ cof o ↔ IsLimit o := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit o with (rfl | ⟨o, rfl⟩ | l)
· simp [not_zero_isLimit, Cardinal.aleph0_ne_zero]
· simp [not_succ_isLimit, Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0]
· simp only [l, iff_true]
refine le_of_not_lt fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨n, e⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.1 h
have := cof_cof o
rw [e, ord_nat] at this
cases n
· simp at e
simp [e, not_zero_isLimit] at l
· rw [natCast_succ, cof_succ] at this
rw [← this, cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ] at e
rcases e with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact not_succ_isLimit _ l
@[simp]
theorem cof_preOmega {o : Ordinal} (ho : IsSuccPrelimit o) : (preOmega o).cof = o.cof := by
by_cases h : IsMin o
· simp [h.eq_bot]
· exact isNormal_preOmega.cof_eq ⟨h, ho⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) : (ω_ o).cof = o.cof :=
isNormal_omega.cof_eq ho
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega0 : cof ω = ℵ₀ :=
(aleph0_le_cof.2 isLimit_omega0).antisymm' <| by
rw [← card_omega0]
apply cof_le_card
theorem cof_eq' (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (h : IsLimit (type r)) :
∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
let ⟨S, H, e⟩ := cof_eq r
⟨S, fun a =>
let a' := enum r ⟨_, h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r a)⟩
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a'
⟨b, h,
(IsOrderConnected.conn a b a' <|
(typein_lt_typein r).1
(by
rw [typein_enum]
exact lt_succ (typein _ _))).resolve_right
ab⟩,
e⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_univ : cof univ.{u, v} = Cardinal.univ.{u, v} :=
le_antisymm (cof_le_card _)
(by
refine le_of_forall_lt fun c h => ?_
rcases lt_univ'.1 h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases @cof_eq Ordinal.{u} (· < ·) _ with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
rw [univ, ← lift_cof, ← Cardinal.lift_lift.{u+1, v, u}, Cardinal.lift_lt, ← Se]
refine lt_of_not_ge fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le h
refine Quotient.inductionOn a (fun α e => ?_) e
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact e
have f := Equiv.ulift.symm.trans f
let g a := (f a).1
let o := succ (iSup g)
rcases H o with ⟨b, h, l⟩
refine l (lt_succ_iff.2 ?_)
rw [← show g (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩) = b by simp [g]]
apply Ordinal.le_iSup)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
/-! ### Results on sets -/
theorem mk_bounded_subset {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) {r : α → α → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (#α).ord = type r) : #{ s : Set α // Bounded r s } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· rw [ha]
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 ha
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
exact (not_unbounded_iff s).2 hs (unbounded_of_isEmpty s)
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
have ha := h'.aleph0_le
apply le_antisymm
· have : { s : Set α | Bounded r s } = ⋃ i, 𝒫{ j | r j i } := setOf_exists _
rw [← coe_setOf, this]
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans ((sum_le_iSup (fun i => #(𝒫{ j | r j i }))).trans
((mul_le_max_of_aleph0_le_left ha).trans ?_))
rw [max_eq_left]
apply ciSup_le' _
intro i
rw [mk_powerset]
apply (h'.two_power_lt _).le
rw [coe_setOf, card_typein, ← lt_ord, hr]
apply typein_lt_type
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· apply bounded_singleton
rw [← hr]
apply isLimit_ord ha
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
theorem mk_subset_mk_lt_cof {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) :
#{ s : Set α // #s < cof (#α).ord } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· simp [ha]
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
apply le_antisymm
· conv_rhs => rw [← mk_bounded_subset h hr]
apply mk_le_mk_of_subset
intro s hs
rw [hr] at hs
exact lt_cof_type hs
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.trans_le (aleph0_le_cof.2 (isLimit_ord h'.aleph0_le))
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] {s : Set (Set α)}
(h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃₀ s) (h₂ : #s < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) : ∃ x ∈ s, Unbounded r x := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [not_unbounded_iff] at h
let f : s → α := fun x : s => wo.wf.sup x (h x.1 x.2)
refine h₂.not_le (le_trans (csInf_le' ⟨range f, fun x => ?_, rfl⟩) mk_range_le)
rcases h₁ x with ⟨y, ⟨c, hc, hy⟩, hxy⟩
exact ⟨f ⟨c, hc⟩, mem_range_self _, fun hxz => hxy (Trans.trans (wo.wf.lt_sup _ hy) hxz)⟩
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_iUnion {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(s : β → Set α) (h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃ x, s x) (h₂ : #β < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) :
∃ x : β, Unbounded r (s x) := by
rw [← sUnion_range] at h₁
rcases unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion r h₁ (mk_range_le.trans_lt h₂) with ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, u⟩
exact ⟨x, u⟩
/-! ### Consequences of König's lemma -/
theorem lt_power_cof {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ c → c < c ^ c.ord.cof :=
Cardinal.inductionOn c fun α h => by
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, re⟩
have := isLimit_ord h
rw [re] at this ⊢
rcases cof_eq' r this with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
have := sum_lt_prod (fun a : S => #{ x // r x a }) (fun _ => #α) fun i => ?_
· simp only [Cardinal.prod_const, Cardinal.lift_id, ← Se, ← mk_sigma, power_def] at this ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ this
refine ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun x => x.2.1
· exact fun a =>
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a
⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩, _, ab⟩, rfl⟩
· have := typein_lt_type r i
rwa [← re, lt_ord] at this
theorem lt_cof_power {a b : Cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (b1 : 1 < b) : a < (b ^ a).ord.cof := by
have b0 : b ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans b1).ne'
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (power_le_power_left <| power_ne_zero a b0)
rw [← power_mul, mul_eq_self ha]
exact lt_power_cof (ha.trans <| (cantor' _ b1).le)
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 1,088 | 1,091 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
/-!
# Probability density function
This file defines the probability density function of random variables, by which we mean
measurable functions taking values in a Borel space. The probability density function is defined
as the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the law of `X`. In particular, a measurable function `f`
is said to the probability density function of a random variable `X` if for all measurable
sets `S`, `ℙ(X ∈ S) = ∫ x in S, f x dx`. Probability density functions are one way of describing
the distribution of a random variable, and are useful for calculating probabilities and
finding moments (although the latter is better achieved with moment generating functions).
This file also defines the continuous uniform distribution and proves some properties about
random variables with this distribution.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.HasPDF` : A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to `HasPDF` with
respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E` if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X`
is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ` and they `HaveLebesgueDecomposition`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf` : If `X` is a random variable that `HasPDF X ℙ μ`, then `pdf X`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform` : A random variable `X` is said to follow the uniform
distribution if it has a constant probability density function with a compact, non-null support.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_pdf_smul` : Law of the unconscious statistician,
i.e. if a random variable `X : Ω → E` has pdf `f`, then `𝔼(g(X)) = ∫ x, f x • g x dx` for
all measurable `g : E → F`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_mul_eq_integral` : A real-valued random variable `X` with
pdf `f` has expectation `∫ x, x * f x dx`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.integral_eq` : If `X` follows the uniform distribution with
its pdf having support `s`, then `X` has expectation `(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x dx` where `λ`
is the Lebesgue measure.
## TODO
Ultimately, we would also like to define characteristic functions to describe distributions as
it exists for all random variables. However, to define this, we will need Fourier transforms
which we currently do not have.
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E]
/-- A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to have a probability density function (`HasPDF`)
with respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E`
if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`
and they have a Lebesgue decomposition (`HaveLebesgueDecomposition`). -/
class HasPDF {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
Prop where
protected aemeasurable' : AEMeasurable X ℙ
protected haveLebesgueDecomposition' : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
protected absolutelyContinuous' : map X ℙ ≪ μ
section HasPDF
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X Y : Ω → E} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
theorem hasPDF_iff :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩⟩
theorem hasPDF_iff_of_aemeasurable (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hasPDF_iff]
simp only [hX, true_and]
variable (X ℙ μ) in
@[measurability]
theorem HasPDF.aemeasurable [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : AEMeasurable X ℙ := HasPDF.aemeasurable' μ
instance HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ :=
HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition'
theorem HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : map X ℙ ≪ μ := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous'
/-- A random variable that `HasPDF` is quasi-measure preserving. -/
theorem HasPDF.quasiMeasurePreserving_of_measurable (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E)
[HasPDF X ℙ μ] (h : Measurable X) : QuasiMeasurePreserving X ℙ μ :=
{ measurable := h
absolutelyContinuous := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous .. }
theorem HasPDF.congr (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] : HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨(HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ).congr hXY, ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.haveLebesgueDecomposition,
ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.absolutelyContinuous⟩
theorem HasPDF.congr_iff (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY, fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias HasPDF.congr' := HasPDF.congr_iff
/-- X `HasPDF` if there is a pdf `f` such that `map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f`. -/
theorem hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) (f : E → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨hX, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [h]
· rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
exact haveLebesgueDecomposition_withDensity μ hf.measurable_mk
· exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f
end HasPDF
/-- If `X` is a random variable, then `pdf X ℙ μ`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`. -/
def pdf {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
E → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ
theorem pdf_def {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
pdf X ℙ μ = (map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ := rfl
theorem pdf_of_not_aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
{X : Ω → E} (hX : ¬AEMeasurable X ℙ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [pdf_def, map_of_not_aemeasurable hX]
exact rnDeriv_zero μ
theorem pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
{μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} (h : ¬(map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ) : pdf X ℙ μ = 0 :=
rnDeriv_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition h
theorem aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
(X : Ω → E) (h : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
contrapose! h
exact pdf_of_not_aemeasurable h
theorem hasPDF_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E}
(hac : map X ℙ ≪ μ) (hpdf : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, hac⟩
· exact aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero X hpdf
· contrapose! hpdf
have := pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition hpdf
filter_upwards using congrFun this
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : Measurable (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
exact measurable_rnDeriv _ _
theorem withDensity_pdf_le_map {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : μ.withDensity (pdf X ℙ μ) ≤ map X ℙ :=
| withDensity_rnDeriv_le _ _
theorem setLIntegral_pdf_le_map {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) (s : Set E) :
∫⁻ x in s, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ ≤ map X ℙ s := by
apply (withDensity_apply_le _ s).trans
exact withDensity_pdf_le_map _ _ _ s
| Mathlib/Probability/Density.lean | 158 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Kevin Klinge, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.DistribMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
/-!
# Localization over left Ore sets.
This file proves results on the localization of rings (monoids with zeros) over a left Ore set.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization>
* [Zoran Škoda, *Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry*][skoda2006]
## Tags
localization, Ore, non-commutative
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u
open OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
section MonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv' (s : S) : (0 : R) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp [Submonoid.smul_def]⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
zero_mul x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_mul_char 0 r 1 s 0 1 (by simp), zero_mul, one_mul]
mul_zero x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, mul_div_one, mul_zero, zero_oreDiv', zero_oreDiv']
end MonoidWithZero
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
instance : CommMonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid R[S⁻¹])
end CommMonoidWithZero
section DistribMulAction
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S] {X : Type*} [AddMonoid X]
variable [DistribMulAction R X]
private def add'' (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
(oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₁ + oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₂) /ₒ (oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ * s₁)
private theorem add''_char (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(hb : sb * s₁ = rb * s₂) (h : sb * s₁ ∈ S) :
add'' r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = (sb • r₁ + rb • r₂) /ₒ ⟨sb * s₁, h⟩ := by
simp only [add'']
have ha := ore_eq (s₁ : R) s₂
generalize oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ = ra at *
generalize oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ = sa at *
rw [oreDiv_eq_iff]
rcases oreCondition sb sa with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
have : sc * rb * s₂ = rc * ra * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc rc, ← ha, ← mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hb]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ s₂ this with ⟨sd, hd⟩
use sd * sc
use sd * rc
simp only [smul_add, smul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul]
constructor
· rw [mul_assoc _ _ rb, hd, mul_assoc, hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (sc : R), hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
attribute [local instance] OreLocalization.oreEqv
private def add' (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
(--plus tilde
Quotient.lift
fun r₁s₁ : X × S => add'' r₁s₁.1 r₁s₁.2 r₂ s₂) <| by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` & `noncomm_ring` were not ported yet
rintro ⟨r₁', s₁'⟩ ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
-- s*, r*
rcases oreCondition (s₁' : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
--s~~, r~~
rcases oreCondition rb sc with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
-- s#, r#
dsimp at *
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₁').2]
have : sd * sb * s₁ = rd * rc * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc, hb', ← mul_assoc, hd, mul_assoc, hc, ← mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ (rd * rc : R) (sd * sb) this (sd * sb * s₁).2]
rw [mul_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def sb, hb, smul_smul, hd, oreDiv_eq_iff]
use 1
use rd
simp only [mul_smul, smul_add, one_smul, OneMemClass.coe_one, one_mul, true_and]
rw [this, hc, mul_assoc]
/-- The addition on the Ore localization. -/
@[irreducible]
private def add : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := fun x =>
Quotient.lift (fun rs : X × S => add' rs.1 rs.2 x)
(by
rintro ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
induction' x with r₃ s₃
show add'' _ _ _ _ = add'' _ _ _ _
dsimp only at *
rcases oreCondition (s₃ : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
rcases oreCondition rc sb with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
have : rd * rb * s₁ = sd * sc * s₃ := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← hb', ← mul_assoc, ← hd, mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₃).2]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ _ _ this.symm (sd * sc * s₃).2]
refine oreDiv_eq_iff.mpr ?_
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, smul_add]
use sd, 1
simp only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_smul, ← hb, Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_assoc, and_true]
simp only [smul_smul, hd])
instance : Add X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨add⟩
theorem oreDiv_add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s s' : S} :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' =
(oreDenom (s : R) s' • r + oreNum (s : R) s' • r') /ₒ (oreDenom (s : R) s' * s) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
theorem oreDiv_add_char' {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(h : sb * s = rb * s') (h' : sb * s ∈ S) :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ ⟨sb * s, h'⟩ := by
with_unfolding_all exact add''_char r s r' s' rb sb h h'
/-- A characterization of the addition on the Ore localizaion, allowing for arbitrary Ore
numerator and Ore denominator. -/
theorem oreDiv_add_char {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : S) (h : sb * s = rb * s') :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ (sb * s) :=
oreDiv_add_char' s s' rb sb h (sb * s).2
/-- Another characterization of the addition on the Ore localization, bundling up all witnesses
and conditions into a sigma type. -/
def oreDivAddChar' (r r' : X) (s s' : S) :
Σ'r'' : R,
Σ's'' : S, s'' * s = r'' * s' ∧ r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (s'' • r + r'' • r') /ₒ (s'' * s) :=
⟨oreNum (s : R) s', oreDenom (s : R) s', ore_eq (s : R) s', oreDiv_add_oreDiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s : S} : r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s = (r + r') /ₒ s := by
simp [oreDiv_add_char s s 1 1 (by simp)]
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'
rcases oreDivAddChar' (sa • r₁ + ra • r₂) r₃ (sa * s₁) s₃ with ⟨rc, sc, hc, q⟩; rw [q]; clear q
simp only [smul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
simp_rw [← add_oreDiv, ← OreLocalization.expand']
congr 2
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (ha.symm ▸ (sa * s₁).2)]; congr; ext; exact ha
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₃ s₃ rc (hc.symm ▸ (sc * (sa * s₁)).2)]; congr; ext; exact hc
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv (s : S) : (0 : X) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp⟩
protected theorem zero_add (x : X[S⁻¹]) : 0 + x = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
protected theorem add_zero (x : X[S⁻¹]) : x + 0 = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
@[irreducible]
private def nsmul : ℕ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := nsmulRec
instance : AddMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_assoc := OreLocalization.add_assoc
zero_add := OreLocalization.zero_add
add_zero := OreLocalization.add_zero
nsmul := nsmul
nsmul_zero _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
nsmul_succ _ _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem smul_zero (x : R[S⁻¹]) : x • (0 : X[S⁻¹]) = 0 := by
induction' x with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, smul_div_one, smul_zero, zero_oreDiv, zero_oreDiv]
protected theorem smul_add (z : R[S⁻¹]) (x y : X[S⁻¹]) :
z • (x + y) = z • x + z • y := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'; norm_cast at ha
rw [OreLocalization.expand' r₁ s₁ sa]
rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (by rw [← ha]; apply SetLike.coe_mem)]
rw [← Subtype.coe_eq_of_eq_mk ha]
repeat rw [oreDiv_smul_oreDiv]
simp only [smul_add, add_oreDiv]
instance : DistribMulAction R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero := OreLocalization.smul_zero
smul_add := OreLocalization.smul_add
instance {R₀} [Monoid R₀] [MulAction R₀ X] [MulAction R₀ R]
[IsScalarTower R₀ R X] [IsScalarTower R₀ R R] :
DistribMulAction R₀ X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero _ := by rw [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_zero]
smul_add _ _ _ := by simp only [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_add]
end DistribMulAction
section AddCommMonoid
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommMonoid X] [DistribMulAction R X]
protected theorem add_comm (x y : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y = y + x := by
induction' x with r s
induction' y with r' s'
rcases oreDivAddChar' r r' s s' with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩
rw [ha', oreDiv_add_char' s' s _ _ ha.symm (ha ▸ (sa * s).2), add_comm]
congr; ext; exact ha
instance instAddCommMonoidOreLocalization : AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_comm := OreLocalization.add_comm
end AddCommMonoid
section AddGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
/-- Negation on the Ore localization is defined via negation on the numerator. -/
@[irreducible]
protected def neg : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand (fun (r : X) (s : S) => -r /ₒ s) fun r t s ht => by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [← smul_neg, ← OreLocalization.expand]
instance instNegOreLocalization : Neg X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.neg⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem neg_def (r : X) (s : S) : -(r /ₒ s) = -r /ₒ s := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem neg_add_cancel (x : X[S⁻¹]) : -x + x = 0 := by
induction' x with r s; simp
/-- `zsmul` of `OreLocalization` -/
@[irreducible]
protected def zsmul : ℤ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := zsmulRec
unseal OreLocalization.zsmul in
instance instAddGroupOreLocalization : AddGroup X[S⁻¹] where
neg_add_cancel := OreLocalization.neg_add_cancel
zsmul := OreLocalization.zsmul
end AddGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
instance : AddCommGroup X[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddGroup X[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹])
end AddCommGroup
end OreLocalization
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OreLocalization/Basic.lean | 426 | 427 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
| exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 912 | 914 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.WellPowered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.LocallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Comma
/-!
# Subobjects in the category of structured arrows
We compute the subobjects of an object `A` in the category `StructuredArrow S T` for `T : C ⥤ D`
and `S : D` as a subtype of the subobjects of `A.right`. We deduce that `StructuredArrow S T` is
well-powered if `C` is.
## Main declarations
* `StructuredArrow.subobjectEquiv`: the order-equivalence between `Subobject A` and a subtype of
`Subobject A.right`.
## Implementation notes
Our computation requires that `C` has all limits and `T` preserves all limits. Furthermore, we
require that the morphisms of `C` and `D` are in the same universe. It is possible that both of
these requirements can be relaxed by refining the results about limits in comma categories.
We also provide the dual results. As usual, we use `Subobject (op A)` for the quotient objects of
`A`.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace StructuredArrow
variable {S : D} {T : C ⥤ D}
/-- Every subobject of a structured arrow can be projected to a subobject of the underlying
object. -/
def projectSubobject [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T] {A : StructuredArrow S T} :
Subobject A → Subobject A.right := by
refine Subobject.lift (fun P f hf => Subobject.mk f.right) ?_
intro P Q f g hf hg i hi
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ ((proj S T).mapIso i) ?_
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.right hi
@[simp]
theorem projectSubobject_mk [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T]
{A P : StructuredArrow S T}
(f : P ⟶ A) [Mono f] : projectSubobject (Subobject.mk f) = Subobject.mk f.right :=
rfl
theorem projectSubobject_factors [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T]
{A : StructuredArrow S T} :
∀ P : Subobject A, ∃ q, q ≫ T.map (projectSubobject P).arrow = A.hom :=
Subobject.ind _ fun P f hf =>
⟨P.hom ≫ T.map (Subobject.underlyingIso _).inv, by
dsimp
simp [← T.map_comp]⟩
/-- A subobject of the underlying object of a structured arrow can be lifted to a subobject of
the structured arrow, provided that there is a morphism making the subobject into a structured
arrow. -/
@[simp]
def liftSubobject {A : StructuredArrow S T} (P : Subobject A.right) {q}
(hq : q ≫ T.map P.arrow = A.hom) : Subobject A :=
Subobject.mk (homMk P.arrow hq : mk q ⟶ A)
/-- Projecting and then lifting a subobject recovers the original subobject, because there is at
most one morphism making the projected subobject into a structured arrow. -/
theorem lift_projectSubobject [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T]
{A : StructuredArrow S T} :
∀ (P : Subobject A) {q} (hq : q ≫ T.map (projectSubobject P).arrow = A.hom),
liftSubobject (projectSubobject P) hq = P :=
Subobject.ind _
(by
intro P f hf q hq
fapply Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm
· fapply isoMk
· exact Subobject.underlyingIso _
· exact (cancel_mono (T.map f.right)).1 (by dsimp; simpa [← T.map_comp] using hq)
· exact ext _ _ (by dsimp; simp))
/-- If `A : S → T.obj B` is a structured arrow for `S : D` and `T : C ⥤ D`, then we can explicitly
describe the subobjects of `A` as the subobjects `P` of `B` in `C` for which `A.hom` factors
through the image of `P` under `T`. -/
def subobjectEquiv [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T] (A : StructuredArrow S T) :
Subobject A ≃o { P : Subobject A.right // ∃ q, q ≫ T.map P.arrow = A.hom } where
toFun P := ⟨projectSubobject P, projectSubobject_factors P⟩
invFun P := liftSubobject P.val P.prop.choose_spec
left_inv _ := lift_projectSubobject _ _
right_inv P := Subtype.ext (by simp only [liftSubobject, homMk_right, projectSubobject_mk,
Subobject.mk_arrow, Subtype.coe_eta])
map_rel_iff' := by
apply Subobject.ind₂
intro P Q f g hf hg
refine ⟨fun h => Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm ?_ ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· exact homMk (Subobject.ofMkLEMk _ _ h)
((cancel_mono (T.map g.right)).1 (by simp [← T.map_comp]))
· simp
· refine Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (Subobject.ofMkLEMk _ _ h).right ?_
exact congr_arg CommaMorphism.right (Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp h)
/-- If `C` is well-powered and complete and `T` preserves limits, then `StructuredArrow S T` is
well-powered. -/
instance wellPowered_structuredArrow [LocallySmall.{w} C]
[WellPowered.{w} C] [HasFiniteLimits C] [PreservesFiniteLimits T] :
WellPowered.{w} (StructuredArrow S T) where
subobject_small X := small_map (subobjectEquiv X).toEquiv
end StructuredArrow
namespace CostructuredArrow
variable {S : C ⥤ D} {T : D}
/-- Every quotient of a costructured arrow can be projected to a quotient of the underlying
object. -/
def projectQuotient [HasFiniteColimits C] [PreservesFiniteColimits S] {A : CostructuredArrow S T} :
Subobject (op A) → Subobject (op A.left) := by
refine Subobject.lift (fun P f hf => Subobject.mk f.unop.left.op) ?_
intro P Q f g hf hg i hi
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ ((proj S T).mapIso i.unop).op (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
have := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop hi
simpa using congr_arg CommaMorphism.left this
@[simp]
theorem projectQuotient_mk [HasFiniteColimits C] [PreservesFiniteColimits S]
{A : CostructuredArrow S T}
{P : (CostructuredArrow S T)ᵒᵖ} (f : P ⟶ op A) [Mono f] :
projectQuotient (Subobject.mk f) = Subobject.mk f.unop.left.op :=
rfl
theorem projectQuotient_factors [HasFiniteColimits C] [PreservesFiniteColimits S]
{A : CostructuredArrow S T} :
∀ P : Subobject (op A), ∃ q, S.map (projectQuotient P).arrow.unop ≫ q = A.hom :=
Subobject.ind _ fun P f hf =>
⟨S.map (Subobject.underlyingIso _).unop.inv ≫ P.unop.hom, by
dsimp
rw [← Category.assoc, ← S.map_comp, ← unop_comp]
simp⟩
/-- A quotient of the underlying object of a costructured arrow can be lifted to a quotient of
the costructured arrow, provided that there is a morphism making the quotient into a
costructured arrow. -/
@[simp]
def liftQuotient {A : CostructuredArrow S T} (P : Subobject (op A.left)) {q}
(hq : S.map P.arrow.unop ≫ q = A.hom) : Subobject (op A) :=
Subobject.mk (homMk P.arrow.unop hq : A ⟶ mk q).op
/-- Technical lemma for `lift_projectQuotient`. -/
@[simp]
theorem unop_left_comp_underlyingIso_hom_unop {A : CostructuredArrow S T}
{P : (CostructuredArrow S T)ᵒᵖ} (f : P ⟶ op A) [Mono f.unop.left.op] :
f.unop.left ≫ (Subobject.underlyingIso f.unop.left.op).hom.unop =
(Subobject.mk f.unop.left.op).arrow.unop := by
conv_lhs =>
congr
rw [← Quiver.Hom.unop_op f.unop.left]
rw [← unop_comp, Subobject.underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk]
/-- Projecting and then lifting a quotient recovers the original quotient, because there is at most
one morphism making the projected quotient into a costructured arrow. -/
theorem lift_projectQuotient [HasFiniteColimits C] [PreservesFiniteColimits S]
{A : CostructuredArrow S T} :
∀ (P : Subobject (op A)) {q} (hq : S.map (projectQuotient P).arrow.unop ≫ q = A.hom),
liftQuotient (projectQuotient P) hq = P :=
Subobject.ind _
(by
intro P f hf q hq
fapply Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm
· refine (Iso.op (isoMk ?_ ?_) : _ ≅ op (unop P))
· exact (Subobject.underlyingIso f.unop.left.op).unop
· refine (cancel_epi (S.map f.unop.left)).1 ?_
simpa [← Category.assoc, ← S.map_comp] using hq
· exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp))
/-- Technical lemma for `quotientEquiv`. -/
theorem unop_left_comp_ofMkLEMk_unop {A : CostructuredArrow S T} {P Q : (CostructuredArrow S T)ᵒᵖ}
{f : P ⟶ op A} {g : Q ⟶ op A} [Mono f.unop.left.op] [Mono g.unop.left.op]
(h : Subobject.mk f.unop.left.op ≤ Subobject.mk g.unop.left.op) :
g.unop.left ≫ (Subobject.ofMkLEMk f.unop.left.op g.unop.left.op h).unop = f.unop.left := by
conv_lhs =>
congr
rw [← Quiver.Hom.unop_op g.unop.left]
rw [← unop_comp]
simp only [Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op]
/-- If `A : S.obj B ⟶ T` is a costructured arrow for `S : C ⥤ D` and `T : D`, then we can
| explicitly describe the quotients of `A` as the quotients `P` of `B` in `C` for which `A.hom`
factors through the image of `P` under `S`. -/
def quotientEquiv [HasFiniteColimits C] [PreservesFiniteColimits S] (A : CostructuredArrow S T) :
Subobject (op A) ≃o { P : Subobject (op A.left) // ∃ q, S.map P.arrow.unop ≫ q = A.hom } where
toFun P := ⟨projectQuotient P, projectQuotient_factors P⟩
invFun P := liftQuotient P.val P.prop.choose_spec
left_inv _ := lift_projectQuotient _ _
right_inv P := Subtype.ext (by simp only [liftQuotient, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, homMk_left,
Quiver.Hom.op_unop, projectQuotient_mk, Subobject.mk_arrow])
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Comma.lean | 199 | 207 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Chain
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
/-!
# Zorn's lemmas
This file proves several formulations of Zorn's Lemma.
## Variants
The primary statement of Zorn's lemma is `exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded`. Then it is specialized
to particular relations:
* `(≤)` with `zorn_le`
* `(⊆)` with `zorn_subset`
* `(⊇)` with `zorn_superset`
Lemma names carry modifiers:
* `₀`: Quantifies over a set, as opposed to over a type.
* `_nonempty`: Doesn't ask to prove that the empty chain is bounded and lets you give an element
that will be smaller than the maximal element found (the maximal element is no smaller than any
other element, but it can also be incomparable to some).
## How-to
This file comes across as confusing to those who haven't yet used it, so here is a detailed
walkthrough:
1. Know what relation on which type/set you're looking for. See Variants above. You can discharge
some conditions to Zorn's lemma directly using a `_nonempty` variant.
2. Write down the definition of your type/set, put a `suffices ∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m by ...`
(or whatever you actually need) followed by an `apply some_version_of_zorn`.
3. Fill in the details. This is where you start talking about chains.
A typical proof using Zorn could look like this
```lean
lemma zorny_lemma : zorny_statement := by
let s : Set α := {x | whatever x}
suffices ∃ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, y ⊆ x → y = x by -- or with another operator xxx
proof_post_zorn
apply zorn_subset -- or another variant
rintro c hcs hc
obtain rfl | hcnemp := c.eq_empty_or_nonempty -- you might need to disjunct on c empty or not
· exact ⟨edge_case_construction,
proof_that_edge_case_construction_respects_whatever,
proof_that_edge_case_construction_contains_all_stuff_in_c⟩
· exact ⟨construction,
proof_that_construction_respects_whatever,
proof_that_construction_contains_all_stuff_in_c⟩
```
## Notes
Originally ported from Isabelle/HOL. The
[original file](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/library/HOL/HOL/Zorn.html) was written by Jacques D.
Fleuriot, Tobias Nipkow, Christian Sternagel.
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {c : Set α}
/-- Local notation for the relation being considered. -/
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => r
/-- **Zorn's lemma**
If every chain has an upper bound, then there exists a maximal element. -/
theorem exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded (h : ∀ c, IsChain r c → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≺ ub)
(trans : ∀ {a b c}, a ≺ b → b ≺ c → a ≺ c) : ∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m :=
have : ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ maxChain r, a ≺ ub := h _ <| maxChain_spec.left
let ⟨ub, (hub : ∀ a ∈ maxChain r, a ≺ ub)⟩ := this
⟨ub, fun a ha =>
have : IsChain r (insert a <| maxChain r) :=
maxChain_spec.1.insert fun b hb _ => Or.inr <| trans (hub b hb) ha
hub a <| by
rw [maxChain_spec.right this (subset_insert _ _)]
exact mem_insert _ _⟩
/-- A variant of Zorn's lemma. If every nonempty chain of a nonempty type has an upper bound, then
there is a maximal element.
-/
theorem exists_maximal_of_nonempty_chains_bounded [Nonempty α]
(h : ∀ c, IsChain r c → c.Nonempty → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≺ ub)
(trans : ∀ {a b c}, a ≺ b → b ≺ c → a ≺ c) : ∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m :=
exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded
(fun c hc =>
(eq_empty_or_nonempty c).elim
(fun h => ⟨Classical.arbitrary α, fun x hx => (h ▸ hx : x ∈ (∅ : Set α)).elim⟩) (h c hc))
trans
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem zorn_le (h : ∀ c : Set α, IsChain (· ≤ ·) c → BddAbove c) : ∃ m : α, IsMax m :=
exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded h le_trans
theorem zorn_le_nonempty [Nonempty α]
(h : ∀ c : Set α, IsChain (· ≤ ·) c → c.Nonempty → BddAbove c) : ∃ m : α, IsMax m :=
exists_maximal_of_nonempty_chains_bounded h le_trans
theorem zorn_le₀ (s : Set α) (ih : ∀ c ⊆ s, IsChain (· ≤ ·) c → ∃ ub ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ c, z ≤ ub) :
∃ m, Maximal (· ∈ s) m :=
let ⟨⟨m, hms⟩, h⟩ :=
@zorn_le s _ fun c hc =>
let ⟨ub, hubs, hub⟩ :=
ih (Subtype.val '' c) (fun _ ⟨⟨_, hx⟩, _, h⟩ => h ▸ hx)
(by
rintro _ ⟨p, hpc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨q, hqc, rfl⟩ hpq
exact hc hpc hqc fun t => hpq (Subtype.ext_iff.1 t))
⟨⟨ub, hubs⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ hc => hub _ ⟨_, hc, rfl⟩⟩
⟨m, hms, fun z hzs hmz => @h ⟨z, hzs⟩ hmz⟩
theorem zorn_le_nonempty₀ (s : Set α)
(ih : ∀ c ⊆ s, IsChain (· ≤ ·) c → ∀ y ∈ c, ∃ ub ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ c, z ≤ ub) (x : α) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
∃ m, x ≤ m ∧ Maximal (· ∈ s) m := by
have H := zorn_le₀ ({ y ∈ s | x ≤ y }) fun c hcs hc => ?_
· rcases H with ⟨m, ⟨hms, hxm⟩, hm⟩
exact ⟨m, hxm, hms, fun z hzs hmz => @hm _ ⟨hzs, hxm.trans hmz⟩ hmz⟩
· rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩)
· exact ⟨x, ⟨hxs, le_rfl⟩, fun z => False.elim⟩
· rcases ih c (fun z hz => (hcs hz).1) hc y hy with ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩
exact ⟨z, ⟨hzs, (hcs hy).2.trans <| hz _ hy⟩, hz⟩
theorem zorn_le_nonempty_Ici₀ (a : α)
(ih : ∀ c ⊆ Ici a, IsChain (· ≤ ·) c → ∀ y ∈ c, ∃ ub, ∀ z ∈ c, z ≤ ub) (x : α) (hax : a ≤ x) :
∃ m, x ≤ m ∧ IsMax m := by
let ⟨m, hxm, ham, hm⟩ := zorn_le_nonempty₀ (Ici a) (fun c hca hc y hy ↦ ?_) x hax
· exact ⟨m, hxm, fun z hmz => hm (ham.trans hmz) hmz⟩
· have ⟨ub, hub⟩ := ih c hca hc y hy
exact ⟨ub, (hca hy).trans (hub y hy), hub⟩
end Preorder
theorem zorn_subset (S : Set (Set α))
(h : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub) : ∃ m, Maximal (· ∈ S) m :=
zorn_le₀ S h
theorem zorn_subset_nonempty (S : Set (Set α))
(H : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → c.Nonempty → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub) (x) (hx : x ∈ S) :
∃ m, x ⊆ m ∧ Maximal (· ∈ S) m :=
zorn_le_nonempty₀ _ (fun _ cS hc y yc => H _ cS hc ⟨y, yc⟩) _ hx
theorem zorn_superset (S : Set (Set α))
(h : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → ∃ lb ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, lb ⊆ s) : ∃ m, Minimal (· ∈ S) m :=
(@zorn_le₀ (Set α)ᵒᵈ _ S) fun c cS hc => h c cS hc.symm
theorem zorn_superset_nonempty (S : Set (Set α))
(H : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → c.Nonempty → ∃ lb ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, lb ⊆ s) (x) (hx : x ∈ S) :
∃ m, m ⊆ x ∧ Minimal (· ∈ S) m :=
@zorn_le_nonempty₀ (Set α)ᵒᵈ _ S (fun _ cS hc y yc => H _ cS hc.symm ⟨y, yc⟩) _ hx
/-- Every chain is contained in a maximal chain. This generalizes Hausdorff's maximality principle.
-/
theorem IsChain.exists_maxChain (hc : IsChain r c) : ∃ M, @IsMaxChain _ r M ∧ c ⊆ M := by
have H := zorn_subset_nonempty { s | c ⊆ s ∧ IsChain r s } ?_ c ⟨Subset.rfl, hc⟩
· obtain ⟨M, hcM, hM⟩ := H
exact ⟨M, ⟨hM.prop.2, fun d hd hMd ↦ hM.eq_of_subset ⟨hcM.trans hMd, hd⟩ hMd⟩, hcM⟩
rintro cs hcs₀ hcs₁ ⟨s, hs⟩
refine
⟨⋃₀cs, ⟨fun _ ha => Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem ((hcs₀ hs).left ha) hs, ?_⟩, fun _ =>
Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem⟩
rintro y ⟨sy, hsy, hysy⟩ z ⟨sz, hsz, hzsz⟩ hyz
obtain rfl | hsseq := eq_or_ne sy sz
· exact (hcs₀ hsy).right hysy hzsz hyz
rcases hcs₁ hsy hsz hsseq with h | h
· exact (hcs₀ hsz).right (h hysy) hzsz hyz
· exact (hcs₀ hsy).right hysy (h hzsz) hyz
/-! ### Flags -/
namespace Flag
variable [Preorder α] {c : Set α} {s : Flag α} {a b : α}
lemma _root_.IsChain.exists_subset_flag (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c) : ∃ s : Flag α, c ⊆ s :=
let ⟨s, hs, hcs⟩ := hc.exists_maxChain; ⟨ofIsMaxChain s hs, hcs⟩
lemma exists_mem (a : α) : ∃ s : Flag α, a ∈ s :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := Set.subsingleton_singleton (a := a).isChain.exists_subset_flag
⟨s, hs rfl⟩
lemma exists_mem_mem (hab : a ≤ b) : ∃ s : Flag α, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
simpa [Set.insert_subset_iff] using (IsChain.pair hab).exists_subset_flag
instance : Nonempty (Flag α) := ⟨.ofIsMaxChain _ maxChain_spec⟩
end Flag
| Mathlib/Order/Zorn.lean | 212 | 229 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.CommShift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
/-! Shifted morphisms
Given a category `C` endowed with a shift by an additive monoid `M` and two
objects `X` and `Y` in `C`, we consider the types `ShiftedHom X Y m`
defined as `X ⟶ (Y⟦m⟧)` for all `m : M`, and the composition on these
shifted hom.
## TODO
* redefine Ext-groups in abelian categories using `ShiftedHom` in the derived category.
* study the `R`-module structures on `ShiftedHom` when `C` is `R`-linear
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D] {E : Type*} [Category E]
{M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [HasShift C M] [HasShift D M] [HasShift E M]
/-- In a category `C` equipped with a shift by an additive monoid,
this is the type of morphisms `X ⟶ (Y⟦n⟧)` for `m : M`. -/
def ShiftedHom (X Y : C) (m : M) : Type _ := X ⟶ (Y⟦m⟧)
instance [Preadditive C] (X Y : C) (n : M) : AddCommGroup (ShiftedHom X Y n) := by
dsimp only [ShiftedHom]
infer_instance
namespace ShiftedHom
variable {X Y Z T : C}
/-- The composition of `f : X ⟶ Y⟦a⟧` and `g : Y ⟶ Z⟦b⟧`, as a morphism `X ⟶ Z⟦c⟧`
when `b + a = c`. -/
noncomputable def comp {a b c : M} (f : ShiftedHom X Y a) (g : ShiftedHom Y Z b) (h : b + a = c) :
ShiftedHom X Z c :=
f ≫ g⟦a⟧' ≫ (shiftFunctorAdd' C b a c h).inv.app _
lemma comp_assoc {a₁ a₂ a₃ a₁₂ a₂₃ a : M}
(α : ShiftedHom X Y a₁) (β : ShiftedHom Y Z a₂) (γ : ShiftedHom Z T a₃)
(h₁₂ : a₂ + a₁ = a₁₂) (h₂₃ : a₃ + a₂ = a₂₃) (h : a₃ + a₂ + a₁ = a) :
(α.comp β h₁₂).comp γ (show a₃ + a₁₂ = a by rw [← h₁₂, ← add_assoc, h]) =
α.comp (β.comp γ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, h]) := by
simp only [comp, assoc, Functor.map_comp,
shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc_inv_app a₃ a₂ a₁ a₂₃ a₁₂ a h₂₃ h₁₂ h,
← NatTrans.naturality_assoc, Functor.comp_map]
/-! In degree `0 : M`, shifted hom `ShiftedHom X Y 0` identify to morphisms `X ⟶ Y`.
We generalize this to `m₀ : M` such that `m₀ : 0` as it shall be convenient when we
apply this with `M := ℤ` and `m₀` the coercion of `0 : ℕ`. -/
/-- The element of `ShiftedHom X Y m₀` (when `m₀ = 0`) attached to a morphism `X ⟶ Y`. -/
noncomputable def mk₀ (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) (f : X ⟶ Y) : ShiftedHom X Y m₀ :=
f ≫ (shiftFunctorZero' C m₀ hm₀).inv.app Y
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Y) ≃ ShiftedHom X Y m₀` when `m₀ = 0`. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def homEquiv (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ ShiftedHom X Y m₀ where
toFun f := mk₀ m₀ hm₀ f
invFun g := g ≫ (shiftFunctorZero' C m₀ hm₀).hom.app Y
left_inv f := by simp [mk₀]
right_inv g := by simp [mk₀]
| lemma mk₀_comp (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) (f : X ⟶ Y) {a : M} (g : ShiftedHom Y Z a) :
(mk₀ m₀ hm₀ f).comp g (by rw [hm₀, add_zero]) = f ≫ g := by
subst hm₀
simp [comp, mk₀, shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_inv_app, shiftFunctorZero']
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Shift/ShiftedHom.lean | 73 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Joey van Langen, Casper Putz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.ValMinAbs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
/-!
# Finite fields
This file contains basic results about finite fields.
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
See `RingTheory.IntegralDomain` for the fact that the unit group of a finite field is a
cyclic group, as well as the fact that every finite integral domain is a field
(`Fintype.fieldOfDomain`).
## Main results
1. `Fintype.card_units`: The unit group of a finite field has cardinality `q - 1`.
2. `sum_pow_units`: The sum of `x^i`, where `x` ranges over the units of `K`, is
- `q-1` if `q-1 ∣ i`
- `0` otherwise
3. `FiniteField.card`: The cardinality `q` is a power of the characteristic of `K`.
See `FiniteField.card'` for a variant.
## Notation
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
## Implementation notes
While `Fintype Kˣ` can be inferred from `Fintype K` in the presence of `DecidableEq K`,
in this file we take the `Fintype Kˣ` argument directly to reduce the chance of typeclass
diamonds, as `Fintype` carries data.
-/
variable {K : Type*} {R : Type*}
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
open Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace FiniteField
section Polynomial
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
open Polynomial
/-- The cardinality of a field is at most `n` times the cardinality of the image of a degree `n`
polynomial -/
theorem card_image_polynomial_eval [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] {p : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p.degree) :
Fintype.card R ≤ natDegree p * #(univ.image fun x => eval x p) :=
Finset.card_le_mul_card_image _ _ (fun a _ =>
calc
_ = #(p - C a).roots.toFinset :=
congr_arg card (by simp [Finset.ext_iff, ← mem_roots_sub_C hp])
_ ≤ Multiset.card (p - C a).roots := Multiset.toFinset_card_le _
_ ≤ _ := card_roots_sub_C' hp)
/-- If `f` and `g` are quadratic polynomials, then the `f.eval a + g.eval b = 0` has a solution. -/
theorem exists_root_sum_quadratic [Fintype R] {f g : R[X]} (hf2 : degree f = 2) (hg2 : degree g = 2)
(hR : Fintype.card R % 2 = 1) : ∃ a b, f.eval a + g.eval b = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
suffices ¬Disjoint (univ.image fun x : R => eval x f)
(univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_image] at this
push_neg at this
rcases this with ⟨x, ⟨a, _, ha⟩, ⟨b, _, hb⟩⟩
exact ⟨a, b, by rw [ha, ← hb, eval_neg, neg_add_cancel]⟩
fun hd : Disjoint _ _ =>
lt_irrefl (2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g))) <|
calc 2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g))
≤ 2 * Fintype.card R := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Finset.card_le_univ _)
_ = Fintype.card R + Fintype.card R := two_mul _
_ < natDegree f * #(univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) +
natDegree (-g) * #(univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(lt_of_le_of_ne (card_image_polynomial_eval (by rw [hf2]; decide))
(mt (congr_arg (· % 2)) (by simp [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hf2, hR])))
(card_image_polynomial_eval (by rw [degree_neg, hg2]; decide)))
_ = 2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) := by
rw [card_union_of_disjoint hd]
simp [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hf2, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hg2, mul_add]
end Polynomial
theorem prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Fintype Kˣ] :
∏ x : Kˣ, x = (-1 : Kˣ) := by
classical
have : (∏ x ∈ (@univ Kˣ _).erase (-1), x) = 1 :=
prod_involution (fun x _ => x⁻¹) (by simp)
(fun a => by simp +contextual [Units.inv_eq_self_iff])
(fun a => by simp [@inv_eq_iff_eq_inv _ _ a]) (by simp)
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ (-1 : Kˣ)), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), this, mul_one]
theorem card_cast_subgroup_card_ne_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K] [Nontrivial K]
(G : Subgroup Kˣ) [Fintype G] : (Fintype.card G : K) ≠ 0 := by
let n := Fintype.card G
intro nzero
have ⟨p, char_p⟩ := CharP.exists K
have hd : p ∣ n := (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K p n).mp nzero
cases CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero K p with
| inr pzero =>
exact (Fintype.card_pos).ne' <| Nat.eq_zero_of_zero_dvd <| pzero ▸ hd
| inl pprime =>
have fact_pprime := Fact.mk pprime
-- G has an element x of order p by Cauchy's theorem
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hd
-- F has an element u (= ↑↑x) of order p
let u := ((x : Kˣ) : K)
have hu : orderOf u = p := by rwa [orderOf_units, Subgroup.orderOf_coe]
-- u ^ p = 1 implies (u - 1) ^ p = 0 and hence u = 1 ...
have h : u = 1 := by
rw [← sub_left_inj, sub_self 1]
apply pow_eq_zero (n := p)
rw [sub_pow_char_of_commute, one_pow, ← hu, pow_orderOf_eq_one, sub_self]
exact Commute.one_right u
-- ... meaning x didn't have order p after all, contradiction
apply pprime.one_lt.ne
rw [← hu, h, orderOf_one]
/-- The sum of a nontrivial subgroup of the units of a field is zero. -/
theorem sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] (hg : G ≠ ⊥) :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = 0 := by
rw [Subgroup.ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨a, ha⟩
-- The action of a on G as an embedding
let a_mul_emb : G ↪ G := mulLeftEmbedding a
-- ... and leaves G unchanged
have h_unchanged : Finset.univ.map a_mul_emb = Finset.univ := by simp
-- Therefore the sum of x over a G is the sum of a x over G
have h_sum_map := Finset.univ.sum_map a_mul_emb fun x => ((x : Kˣ) : K)
-- ... and the former is the sum of x over G.
-- By algebraic manipulation, we have Σ G, x = ∑ G, a x = a ∑ G, x
simp only [h_unchanged, mulLeftEmbedding_apply, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, ← mul_sum,
a_mul_emb] at h_sum_map
-- thus one of (a - 1) or ∑ G, x is zero
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) - 1) = 0 ∨ ∑ x : ↥G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) = 0 := by
rw [← mul_eq_zero, sub_mul, ← h_sum_map, one_mul, sub_self]
apply Or.resolve_left hzero
contrapose! ha
ext
rwa [← sub_eq_zero]
/-- The sum of a subgroup of the units of a field is 1 if the subgroup is trivial and 1 otherwise -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_units [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] [Decidable (G = ⊥)] :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = if G = ⊥ then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases G_bot : G = ⊥
· subst G_bot
simp only [univ_unique, sum_singleton, ↓reduceIte, Units.val_eq_one, OneMemClass.coe_eq_one]
rw [Set.default_coe_singleton]
rfl
· simp only [G_bot, ite_false]
exact sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero G_bot
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_pow_eq_zero [CommRing K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) :
∑ x : G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at k_lt_card_G
nontriviality K
have := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain K
rcases (exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic k_pos k_lt_card_G) with ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
have h_multiset_map :
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) =
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) := by
simp_rw [← mul_pow]
have as_comp :
(fun x : ↥G => (((x : Kˣ) : K) * ((a : Kˣ) : K)) ^ k)
= (fun x : ↥G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) ∘ fun x : ↥G => x * a := by
funext x
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul]
rw [as_comp, ← Multiset.map_map]
congr
rw [eq_comm]
exact Multiset.map_univ_val_equiv (Equiv.mulRight a)
have h_multiset_map_sum : (Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum =
(Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum := by
rw [h_multiset_map]
rw [Multiset.sum_map_mul_right] at h_multiset_map_sum
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k - 1 : K)
* (Multiset.map (fun i : G => (i.val : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum = 0 := by
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm, ← h_multiset_map_sum, one_mul, sub_self]
rw [mul_eq_zero] at hzero
refine hzero.resolve_left fun h => ha ?_
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
simp_rw [SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, OneMemClass.coe_one, Units.val_one, h]
section
variable [GroupWithZero K] [Fintype K]
theorem pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ^ (q - 1) = 1 := by
calc
a ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) = (Units.mk0 a ha ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) : Kˣ).1 := by
rw [Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_mk0]
_ = 1 := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_units, pow_card_eq_one]
rfl
theorem pow_card (a : K) : a ^ q = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [h]; apply zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Fintype.card_pos, pow_succ, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one,
pow_card_sub_one_eq_one a h, one_mul]
theorem pow_card_pow (n : ℕ) (a : K) : a ^ q ^ n = a := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [pow_succ, pow_mul, ih, pow_card]
end
variable (K) [Field K] [Fintype K]
/-- The cardinality `q` is a power of the characteristic of `K`. -/
@[stacks 09HY "first part"]
theorem card (p : ℕ) [CharP K p] : ∃ n : ℕ+, Nat.Prime p ∧ q = p ^ (n : ℕ) := by
haveI hp : Fact p.Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime K p⟩
letI : Module (ZMod p) K := { (ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl K : ZMod p →+* _).toModule with }
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := VectorSpace.card_fintype (ZMod p) K
rw [ZMod.card] at h
refine ⟨⟨n, ?_⟩, hp.1, h⟩
apply Or.resolve_left (Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n)
rintro rfl
rw [pow_zero] at h
have : (0 : K) = 1 := by apply Fintype.card_le_one_iff.mp (le_of_eq h)
exact absurd this zero_ne_one
-- this statement doesn't use `q` because we want `K` to be an explicit parameter
theorem card' : ∃ (p : ℕ), CharP K p ∧ ∃ (n : ℕ+), Nat.Prime p ∧ Fintype.card K = p ^ (n : ℕ) :=
let ⟨p, hc⟩ := CharP.exists K
⟨p, hc, @FiniteField.card K _ _ p hc⟩
lemma isPrimePow_card : IsPrimePow (Fintype.card K) := by
obtain ⟨p, _, n, hp, hn⟩ := card' K
exact ⟨p, n, Nat.prime_iff.mp hp, n.prop, hn.symm⟩
theorem cast_card_eq_zero : (q : K) = 0 := by
simp
theorem forall_pow_eq_one_iff (i : ℕ) : (∀ x : Kˣ, x ^ i = 1) ↔ q - 1 ∣ i := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := Kˣ)
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Nat.card_units, ← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hx,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h; apply h
· intro h y
simp_rw [← mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers] at hx
rcases hx y with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]
/-- The sum of `x ^ i` as `x` ranges over the units of a finite field of cardinality `q`
is equal to `0` unless `(q - 1) ∣ i`, in which case the sum is `q - 1`. -/
theorem sum_pow_units [DecidableEq K] (i : ℕ) :
(∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K)) = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
let φ : Kˣ →* K :=
{ toFun := fun x => x ^ i
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by intros; simp [mul_pow] }
have : Decidable (φ = 1) := by classical infer_instance
calc (∑ x : Kˣ, φ x) = if φ = 1 then Fintype.card Kˣ else 0 := sum_hom_units φ
_ = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
suffices q - 1 ∣ i ↔ φ = 1 by
simp only [this]
split_ifs; swap
· exact Nat.cast_zero
· rw [Fintype.card_units, Nat.cast_sub,
cast_card_eq_zero, Nat.cast_one, zero_sub]
show 1 ≤ q; exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨0⟩
rw [← forall_pow_eq_one_iff, DFunLike.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'; intro x; simp [φ, Units.ext_iff]
/-- The sum of `x ^ i` as `x` ranges over a finite field of cardinality `q`
is equal to `0` if `i < q - 1`. -/
theorem sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one (i : ℕ) (h : i < q - 1) : ∑ x : K, x ^ i = 0 := by
by_cases hi : i = 0
· simp only [hi, nsmul_one, sum_const, pow_zero, card_univ, cast_card_eq_zero]
classical
have hiq : ¬q - 1 ∣ i := by contrapose! h; exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi) h
let φ : Kˣ ↪ K := ⟨fun x ↦ x, Units.ext⟩
have : univ.map φ = univ \ {0} := by
ext x
simpa only [mem_map, mem_univ, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, true_and, mem_sdiff,
mem_singleton, φ] using isUnit_iff_ne_zero
calc
∑ x : K, x ^ i = ∑ x ∈ univ \ {(0 : K)}, x ^ i := by
rw [← sum_sdiff ({0} : Finset K).subset_univ, sum_singleton, zero_pow hi, add_zero]
_ = ∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K) := by simp [φ, ← this, univ.sum_map φ]
_ = 0 := by rw [sum_pow_units K i, if_neg]; exact hiq
section frobenius
variable (R) [CommRing R] [Algebra K R]
/-- If `R` is an algebra over a finite field `K`, the Frobenius `K`-algebra endomorphism of `R` is
given by raising every element of `R` to its `#K`-th power. -/
@[simps!] def frobeniusAlgHom : R →ₐ[K] R where
__ := powMonoidHom q
map_zero' := zero_pow Fintype.card_pos.ne'
map_add' _ _ := by
obtain ⟨p, _, _, hp, card_eq⟩ := card' K
nontriviality R
have : CharP R p := charP_of_injective_algebraMap' K R p
have : ExpChar R p := .prime hp
simp only [OneHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe, powMonoidHom_apply, card_eq]
exact add_pow_expChar_pow ..
commutes' _ := by simp [← RingHom.map_pow, pow_card]
theorem coe_frobeniusAlgHom : ⇑(frobeniusAlgHom K R) = (· ^ q) := rfl
/-- If `R` is a perfect ring and an algebra over a finite field `K`, the Frobenius `K`-algebra
endomorphism of `R` is an automorphism. -/
@[simps!] noncomputable def frobeniusAlgEquiv (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] [PerfectRing R p] : R ≃ₐ[K] R :=
.ofBijective (frobeniusAlgHom K R) <| by
obtain ⟨p', _, n, hp, card_eq⟩ := card' K
rw [coe_frobeniusAlgHom, card_eq]
have : ExpChar K p' := ExpChar.prime hp
nontriviality R
have := ExpChar.eq ‹_› (expChar_of_injective_algebraMap (algebraMap K R).injective p')
subst this
apply bijective_iterateFrobenius
variable (L : Type*) [Field L] [Algebra K L]
/-- If `L/K` is an algebraic extension of a finite field, the Frobenius `K`-algebra endomorphism
of `L` is an automorphism. -/
@[simps!] noncomputable def frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] : L ≃ₐ[K] L :=
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L).symm (frobeniusAlgHom K L)
theorem coe_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] :
⇑(frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L) = (· ^ q) := rfl
variable [Finite L]
open Polynomial in
theorem orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom : orderOf (frobeniusAlgHom K L) = Module.finrank K L :=
(orderOf_eq_iff Module.finrank_pos).mpr <| by
have := Fintype.ofFinite L
refine ⟨DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ ?_, fun m lt pos eq ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [AlgHom.coe_pow, coe_frobeniusAlgHom, pow_iterate, AlgHom.one_apply,
← Module.card_eq_pow_finrank, pow_card]
have := card_le_degree_of_subset_roots (R := L) (p := X ^ q ^ m - X) (Z := univ) fun x _ ↦ by
simp_rw [mem_roots', IsRoot, eval_sub, eval_pow, eval_X]
have := DFunLike.congr_fun eq x
rw [AlgHom.coe_pow, coe_frobeniusAlgHom, pow_iterate, AlgHom.one_apply, ← sub_eq_zero] at this
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, this⟩
simpa [if_neg (Nat.one_lt_pow pos.ne' Fintype.one_lt_card).ne] using congr_arg (coeff · 1) h
refine this.not_lt (((natDegree_sub_le ..).trans_eq ?_).trans_lt <|
(Nat.pow_lt_pow_right Fintype.one_lt_card lt).trans_eq Module.card_eq_pow_finrank.symm)
simp [Nat.one_le_pow _ _ Fintype.card_pos]
theorem orderOf_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic :
orderOf (frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L) = Module.finrank K L := by
simpa [orderOf_eq_iff Module.finrank_pos, DFunLike.ext_iff] using orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L
theorem bijective_frobeniusAlgHom_pow :
Function.Bijective fun n : Fin (Module.finrank K L) ↦ frobeniusAlgHom K L ^ n.1 :=
let e := (finCongr <| orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L).symm.trans <|
finEquivPowers (orderOf_pos_iff.mp <| orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L ▸ Module.finrank_pos)
(Subtype.val_injective.comp e.injective).bijective_of_nat_card_le
((card_algHom_le_finrank K L L).trans_eq <| by simp)
theorem bijective_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic_pow :
Function.Bijective fun n : Fin (Module.finrank K L) ↦ frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L ^ n.1 :=
((Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L).bijective.of_comp_iff' _).mp <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_pow] using bijective_frobeniusAlgHom_pow K L
instance (K L) [Finite L] [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] : IsCyclic (L ≃ₐ[K] L) where
exists_zpow_surjective :=
have := Finite.of_injective _ (algebraMap K L).injective
have := Fintype.ofFinite K
⟨frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L,
fun f ↦ have ⟨n, hn⟩ := (bijective_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic_pow K L).2 f; ⟨n, hn⟩⟩
end frobenius
|
open Polynomial
section
variable [Fintype K] (K' : Type*) [Field K'] {p n : ℕ}
theorem X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p := by
have h1 : (X : K'[X]).degree < (X ^ p : K'[X]).degree := by
rw [degree_X_pow, degree_X]
exact mod_cast hp
rw [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt h1), natDegree_X_pow]
theorem X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : 1 < p) :
(X ^ p ^ n - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p ^ n :=
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Basic.lean | 401 | 415 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
| theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 209 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
/-!
# Lemmas about division (semi)rings and (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
universe u
variable {K L : Type*}
section DivisionSemiring
variable [DivisionSemiring K] {a b c d : K}
theorem add_div (a b c : K) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_mul]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
(add_div _ _ _).symm
theorem same_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : (b + a) / b = 1 + a / b := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem div_add_same (h : b ≠ 0) : (a + b) / b = a / b + 1 := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem one_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 + a / b = (b + a) / b :=
(same_add_div h).symm
theorem div_add_one (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b + 1 = (a + b) / b :=
(div_add_same h).symm
/-- See `inv_add_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_add_inv' (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (a + b) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_add_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (a + b) * (1 / b) = 1 / a + 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_add_inv' ha hb).symm
theorem add_div_eq_mul_add_div (a b : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a + b / c = (a * c + b) / c :=
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq hc).2 <| by rw [right_distrib, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem add_div' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b + a / c = (b * c + a) / c := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c + b = (a + b * c) / c := by
rwa [add_comm, add_div', add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.div_add_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_mul_right _ b hd, hbc.eq, hbd.eq, mul_div_mul_right c d hb]
protected theorem Commute.one_div_add_one_div (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [(Commute.one_right a).div_add_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.inv_add_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, hab.one_div_add_one_div ha hb]
variable [NeZero (2 : K)]
@[simp] lemma add_self_div_two (a : K) : (a + a) / 2 = a := by
rw [← mul_two, mul_div_cancel_right₀ a two_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_halves (a : K) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by rw [← add_div, add_self_div_two]
end DivisionSemiring
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K] {a b c d : K}
@[simp]
theorem div_neg_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / -a = -1 := by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self h]
@[simp]
theorem neg_div_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : -a / a = -1 := by rw [neg_div, div_self h]
theorem div_sub_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c - b / c = (a - b) / c := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_div, div_add_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem same_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (b - a) / b = 1 - a / b := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same b a b).symm
theorem one_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 - a / b = (b - a) / b :=
(same_sub_div h).symm
theorem div_sub_same {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (a - b) / b = a / b - 1 := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same a b b).symm
theorem div_sub_one {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b - 1 = (a - b) / b :=
(div_sub_same h).symm
theorem sub_div (a b c : K) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
(div_sub_div_same _ _ _).symm
/-- See `inv_sub_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_sub_inv' {a b : K} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (b - a) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_sub_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_sub_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (b - a) * (1 / b) = 1 / a - 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_sub_inv' ha hb).symm
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isDomain : IsDomain K :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
protected theorem Commute.div_sub_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b - c / d = (a * d - b * c) / (b * d) := by
simpa only [mul_neg, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using hbc.neg_right.div_add_div hbd hb hd
protected theorem Commute.inv_sub_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = (b - a) / (a * b) := by
simp only [inv_eq_one_div, (Commute.one_right a).div_sub_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one]
variable [NeZero (2 : K)]
lemma sub_half (a : K) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_halves]
lemma half_sub (a : K) : a / 2 - a = -(a / 2) := by rw [← neg_sub, sub_half]
end DivisionRing
section Semifield
variable [Semifield K] {a b d : K}
theorem div_add_div (a : K) (c : K) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) :=
(Commute.all b _).div_add_div (Commute.all _ _) hb hd
theorem one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : 1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
(Commute.all a _).one_div_add_one_div ha hb
theorem inv_add_inv (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
(Commute.all a _).inv_add_inv ha hb
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean | 151 | 151 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
| theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 202 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
/-! # Interactions between `R[X]` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`
This file contains the basic API for "pushing through" the isomorphism
`opRingEquiv : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`. It allows going back and forth between a polynomial ring
over a semiring and the polynomial ring over the opposite semiring. -/
open Polynomial
open Polynomial MulOpposite
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]` sending each coefficient of a polynomial
to the corresponding element of the opposite ring. -/
def opRingEquiv (R : Type*) [Semiring R] : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X] :=
((toFinsuppIso R).op.trans AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv).trans (toFinsuppIso _).symm
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `opRingEquiv R` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
opRingEquiv R (op (monomial n r : R[X])) = monomial n (op r) := by
simp only [opRingEquiv, RingEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.op_apply_apply, toFinsuppIso_apply, unop_op,
toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.mapRange_single, toFinsuppIso_symm_apply, ofFinsupp_single]
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C (a : R) : opRingEquiv R (op (C a)) = C (op a) :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 0 a
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_X : opRingEquiv R (op (X : R[X])) = X :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 1 1
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
opRingEquiv R (op (C r * X ^ n : R[X])) = C (op r) * X ^ n := by
simp only [X_pow_mul, op_mul, op_pow, map_mul, map_pow, opRingEquiv_op_X, opRingEquiv_op_C]
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `(opRingEquiv R).symm` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (monomial n r) = op (monomial n (unop r)) :=
(opRingEquiv R).injective (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C (a : Rᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R).symm (C a) = op (C (unop a)) :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 0 a
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_X : (opRingEquiv R).symm (X : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op X :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 1 1
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C_mul_X_pow (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (C r * X ^ n : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op (C (unop r) * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, opRingEquiv_symm_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
/-! Lemmas about more global properties of polynomials and opposites. -/
@[simp]
theorem coeff_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) :
(opRingEquiv R p).coeff n = op ((unop p).coeff n) := by
induction' p with p
cases p
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R p).support = (unop p).support := by
induction' p with p
cases p
exact Finsupp.support_mapRange_of_injective (map_zero _) _ op_injective
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R p).natDegree = (unop p).natDegree := by
by_cases p0 : p = 0
· simp only [p0, map_zero, natDegree_zero, unop_zero]
· simp only [p0, natDegree_eq_support_max', Ne, EmbeddingLike.map_eq_zero_iff, not_false_iff,
support_opRingEquiv, unop_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) :
(opRingEquiv R p).leadingCoeff = op (unop p).leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, coeff_opRingEquiv, natDegree_opRingEquiv, leadingCoeff]
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Opposites.lean | 103 | 106 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.RightHomology
/-!
# Homology of short complexes
In this file, we shall define the homology of short complexes `S`, i.e. diagrams
`f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`. We shall say that
`[S.HasHomology]` when there exists `h : S.HomologyData`. A homology data
for `S` consists of compatible left/right homology data `left` and `right`. The
left homology data `left` involves an object `left.H` that is a cokernel of the canonical
map `S.X₁ ⟶ K` where `K` is a kernel of `g`. On the other hand, the dual notion `right.H`
is a kernel of the canonical morphism `Q ⟶ S.X₃` when `Q` is a cokernel of `f`.
The compatibility that is required involves an isomorphism `left.H ≅ right.H` which
makes a certain pentagon commute. When such a homology data exists, `S.homology`
shall be defined as `h.left.H` for a chosen `h : S.HomologyData`.
This definition requires very little assumption on the category (only the existence
of zero morphisms). We shall prove that in abelian categories, all short complexes
have homology data.
Note: This definition arose by the end of the Liquid Tensor Experiment which
contained a structure `has_homology` which is quite similar to `S.HomologyData`.
After the category `ShortComplex C` was introduced by J. Riou, A. Topaz suggested
such a structure could be used as a basis for the *definition* of homology.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ S₄ : ShortComplex C}
namespace ShortComplex
/-- A homology data for a short complex consists of two compatible left and
right homology data -/
structure HomologyData where
/-- a left homology data -/
left : S.LeftHomologyData
/-- a right homology data -/
right : S.RightHomologyData
/-- the compatibility isomorphism relating the two dual notions of
`LeftHomologyData` and `RightHomologyData` -/
iso : left.H ≅ right.H
/-- the pentagon relation expressing the compatibility of the left
and right homology data -/
comm : left.π ≫ iso.hom ≫ right.ι = left.i ≫ right.p := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] HomologyData.comm
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData)
/-- A homology map data for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` where both `S₁` and `S₂` are
equipped with homology data consists of left and right homology map data. -/
structure HomologyMapData where
/-- a left homology map data -/
left : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁.left h₂.left
/-- a right homology map data -/
right : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁.right h₂.right
namespace HomologyMapData
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma comm (h : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
h.left.φH ≫ h₂.iso.hom = h₁.iso.hom ≫ h.right.φH := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.left.π, ← cancel_mono h₂.right.ι, assoc,
LeftHomologyMapData.commπ_assoc, HomologyData.comm, LeftHomologyMapData.commi_assoc,
RightHomologyMapData.commι, HomologyData.comm_assoc, RightHomologyMapData.commp]
instance : Subsingleton (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
rintro ⟨left₁, right₁⟩ ⟨left₂, right₂⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, and_self]⟩
instance : Inhabited (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance : Unique (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable (φ h₁ h₂)
/-- A choice of the (unique) homology map data associated with a morphism
`φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` where both short complexes `S₁` and `S₂` are equipped with
homology data. -/
def homologyMapData : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_left_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) :
γ₁.left.φH = γ₂.left.φH := by rw [eq]
end HomologyMapData
namespace HomologyData
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc
right := RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel (hf : S.f = 0) [HasKernel S.g] :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernel S hf
right := RightHomologyData.ofHasKernel S hf
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc
right := RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel (hg : S.g = 0) [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofHasCokernel S hg
right := RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernel S hg
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a homology data on S -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg
right := RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a homology data for `S₁` induces a homology data for `S₂`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HomologyData S₂ where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.left
right := RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.right
iso := h.iso
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a homology data for `S₂` induces a homology data for `S₁`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₂)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HomologyData S₁ where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.left
right := RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.right
iso := h.iso
/-- If `e : S₁ ≅ S₂` is an isomorphism of short complexes and `h₁ : HomologyData S₁`,
this is the homology data for `S₂` deduced from the isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁) :=
h.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono e.hom
variable {S}
/-- A homology data for a short complex `S` induces a homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.HomologyData) : S.op.HomologyData where
left := h.right.op
right := h.left.op
iso := h.iso.op
comm := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.HomologyData) : S.unop.HomologyData where
left := h.right.unop
right := h.left.unop
iso := h.iso.unop
comm := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
end HomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has homology when there exists a `S.HomologyData` -/
class HasHomology : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists a homology data -/
condition : Nonempty S.HomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.HomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has homology -/
noncomputable def homologyData [HasHomology S] :
S.HomologyData := HasHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
lemma HasHomology.mk' (h : S.HomologyData) : HasHomology S :=
⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance [HasHomology S] : HasHomology S.op :=
HasHomology.mk' S.homologyData.op
instance (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) [HasHomology S] : HasHomology S.unop :=
HasHomology.mk' S.homologyData.unop
instance hasLeftHomology_of_hasHomology [S.HasHomology] : S.HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' S.homologyData.left
instance hasRightHomology_of_hasHomology [S.HasHomology] : S.HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' S.homologyData.right
instance hasHomology_of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance hasHomology_of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance hasHomology_of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
lemma hasHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₁]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasHomology S₂ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ S₁.homologyData)
lemma hasHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₂]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasHomology S₁ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ S₂.homologyData)
lemma hasHomology_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [HasHomology S₁] : HasHomology S₂ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofIso e S₁.homologyData)
namespace HomologyMapData
/-- The homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.HomologyData) : HomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.id h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.id h.right
/-- The homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
HomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁.left h₂.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁.right h₂.right
/-- The composition of homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.HomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : HomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
HomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
left := ψ.left.comp ψ'.left
right := ψ.right.comp ψ'.right
/-- A homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def op {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
HomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
left := ψ.right.op
right := ψ.left.op
/-- A homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
HomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
left := ψ.right.unop
right := ψ.left.unop
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁) (HomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofZeros φ hf₁ hg₁ hf₂ hg₂
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofZeros φ hf₁ hg₁ hf₂ hg₂
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork φ hg₁ c₁ hc₁ hg₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork φ hg₁ c₁ hc₁ hg₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofIsLimitKernelFork φ hf₁ c₁ hc₁ hf₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofIsLimitKernelFork φ hf₁ c₁ hc₁ hf₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
HomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork S hf hg c hc
right := RightHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork S hf hg c hc
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the homology data
`HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
HomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork S hf hg c hc
right := RightHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork S hf hg c hc
/-- This homology map data expresses compatibilities of the homology data
constructed by `HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono` -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
HomologyMapData φ h (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.right
/-- This homology map data expresses compatibilities of the homology data
constructed by `HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'` -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₂)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h) h where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.right
end HomologyMapData
variable (S)
/-- The homology of a short complex is the `left.H` field of a chosen homology data. -/
noncomputable def homology [HasHomology S] : C := S.homologyData.left.H
/-- When a short complex has homology, this is the canonical isomorphism
`S.leftHomology ≅ S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] : S.leftHomology ≅ S.homology :=
leftHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- When a short complex has homology, this is the canonical isomorphism
`S.rightHomology ≅ S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] : S.rightHomology ≅ S.homology :=
rightHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _ ≪≫ S.homologyData.iso.symm
variable {S}
/-- When a short complex has homology, its homology can be computed using
any left homology data. -/
noncomputable def LeftHomologyData.homologyIso (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [S.HasHomology] :
S.homology ≅ h.H := S.leftHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ h.leftHomologyIso
/-- When a short complex has homology, its homology can be computed using
any right homology data. -/
noncomputable def RightHomologyData.homologyIso (h : S.RightHomologyData) [S.HasHomology] :
S.homology ≅ h.H := S.rightHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ h.rightHomologyIso
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_leftHomologyData [S.HasHomology] :
S.leftHomologyData.homologyIso = S.leftHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [homologyIso, leftHomologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso]
rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma RightHomologyData.homologyIso_rightHomologyData [S.HasHomology] :
S.rightHomologyData.homologyIso = S.rightHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
simp [homologyIso, rightHomologyIso]
variable {S}
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced homology map `h₁.left.H ⟶ h₁.left.H`. -/
def homologyMap' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
h₁.left.H ⟶ h₂.left.H := leftHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The homology map `S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def homologyMap (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₁] [HasHomology S₂] :
S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology :=
homologyMap' φ _ _
namespace HomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(γ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma homologyMap'_eq : homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.left.φH :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma cyclesMap'_eq : cyclesMap' φ h₁.left h₂.left = γ.left.φK :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φK (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma opcyclesMap'_eq : opcyclesMap' φ h₁.right h₂.right = γ.right.φQ :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φQ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end HomologyMapData
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
lemma homologyMap_eq :
homologyMap φ = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [homologyMap, LeftHomologyData.homologyIso, leftHomologyIso,
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, homologyMap']
simp only [← γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
lemma homologyMap_comm :
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.homologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end LeftHomologyMapData
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
lemma homologyMap_eq :
homologyMap φ = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [homologyMap, homologyMap', RightHomologyData.homologyIso,
rightHomologyIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso]
have γ' : HomologyMapData φ S₁.homologyData S₂.homologyData := default
simp only [← γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, assoc, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp_assoc,
id_comp, comp_id, γ'.left.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ'.right.rightHomologyMap'_eq, ← γ'.comm_assoc,
Iso.hom_inv_id]
lemma homologyMap_comm :
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.homologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end RightHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_id (h : S.HomologyData) :
homologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(HomologyMapData.id h).homologyMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_id [HasHomology S] :
homologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
homologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
homologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(HomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).homologyMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_zero [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] :
homologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
homologyMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
lemma homologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.HomologyData) :
homologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = homologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
homologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ :=
leftHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_comp [HasHomology S₁] [HasHomology S₂] [HasHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
homologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = homologyMap φ₁ ≫ homologyMap φ₂ :=
homologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given an isomorphism `S₁ ≅ S₂` of short complexes and homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced homology isomorphism `h₁.left.H ≅ h₁.left.H`. -/
@[simps]
def homologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) : h₁.left.H ≅ h₂.left.H where
hom := homologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := homologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← homologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, homologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← homologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, homologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_homologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
IsIso (homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (homologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The homology isomorphism `S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology` induced by an isomorphism
`S₁ ≅ S₂` of short complexes. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology]
[S₂.HasHomology] : S₁.homology ≅ S₂.homology where
hom := homologyMap e.hom
inv := homologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← homologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, homologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← homologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, homologyMap_id]
instance isIso_homologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasHomology]
[S₂.HasHomology] :
IsIso (homologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (homologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
section
variable (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
/-- If a short complex `S` has both a left homology data `h₁` and a right homology data `h₂`,
this is the canonical morphism `h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H`. -/
def leftRightHomologyComparison' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H :=
h₂.liftH (h₁.descH (h₁.i ≫ h₂.p) (by simp))
(by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.π, LeftHomologyData.π_descH_assoc, assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g', LeftHomologyData.wi, comp_zero])
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq_liftH :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ =
h₂.liftH (h₁.descH (h₁.i ≫ h₂.p) (by simp))
(by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.π, LeftHomologyData.π_descH_assoc, assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g', LeftHomologyData.wi, comp_zero]) := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι :
h₁.π ≫ leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.i ≫ h₂.p := by
simp only [leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq_liftH,
RightHomologyData.liftH_ι, LeftHomologyData.π_descH]
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq_descH :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ =
h₁.descH (h₂.liftH (h₁.i ≫ h₂.p) (by simp))
(by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.ι, assoc, RightHomologyData.liftH_ι,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, RightHomologyData.wp, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h₂.ι, ← cancel_epi h₁.π, π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι,
LeftHomologyData.π_descH_assoc, RightHomologyData.liftH_ι]
end
variable (S)
/-- If a short complex `S` has both a left and right homology,
this is the canonical morphism `S.leftHomology ⟶ S.rightHomology`. -/
noncomputable def leftRightHomologyComparison [S.HasLeftHomology] [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.leftHomology ⟶ S.rightHomology :=
leftRightHomologyComparison' _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_leftRightHomologyComparison_ι [S.HasLeftHomology] [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ S.leftRightHomologyComparison ≫ S.rightHomologyι =
S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles :=
π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₁' : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₂' : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₁' ≫ leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁' h₂' =
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ ≫ rightHomologyMap' φ h₂ h₂' := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.π, ← cancel_mono h₂'.ι, assoc,
leftHomologyπ_naturality'_assoc, rightHomologyι_naturality',
π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι, π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι_assoc,
cyclesMap'_i_assoc, p_opcyclesMap']
variable {S}
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_compatibility (h₁ h₁' : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ h₂' : S.RightHomologyData) :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ = leftHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h₁ h₁' ≫
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁' h₂' ≫ rightHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) _ _ := by
rw [leftRightHomologyComparison'_naturality_assoc (𝟙 S) h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂',
← rightHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id, rightHomologyMap'_id, comp_id]
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison_eq [S.HasLeftHomology] [S.HasRightHomology]
(h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.leftRightHomologyComparison = h₁.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.inv :=
leftRightHomologyComparison'_compatibility _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma HomologyData.leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq (h : S.HomologyData) :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h.left h.right = h.iso.hom := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.left.π, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι, assoc,
π_leftRightHomologyComparison'_ι, comm]
instance isIso_leftRightHomologyComparison'_of_homologyData (h : S.HomologyData) :
IsIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' h.left h.right) := by
rw [h.leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq]
infer_instance
instance isIso_leftRightHomologyComparison' [S.HasHomology]
(h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂) := by
rw [leftRightHomologyComparison'_compatibility h₁ S.homologyData.left h₂
S.homologyData.right]
infer_instance
instance isIso_leftRightHomologyComparison [S.HasHomology] :
IsIso S.leftRightHomologyComparison := by
dsimp only [leftRightHomologyComparison]
infer_instance
namespace HomologyData
/-- This is the homology data for a short complex `S` that is obtained
from a left homology data `h₁` and a right homology data `h₂` when the comparison
morphism `leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H` is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison'
(h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
[IsIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂)] :
S.HomologyData where
left := h₁
right := h₂
iso := asIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂)
end HomologyData
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq_leftHomologpMap'_comp_iso_hom_comp_rightHomologyMap'
(h : S.HomologyData) (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ =
leftHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h₁ h.left ≫ h.iso.hom ≫ rightHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h.right h₂ := by
simpa only [h.leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq] using
leftRightHomologyComparison'_compatibility h₁ h.left h₂ h.right
@[reassoc]
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison'_fac (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
[S.HasHomology] :
leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂ = h₁.homologyIso.inv ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom := by
rw [leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq_leftHomologpMap'_comp_iso_hom_comp_rightHomologyMap'
S.homologyData h₁ h₂]
dsimp only [LeftHomologyData.homologyIso, LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso,
Iso.symm, Iso.trans, Iso.refl, leftHomologyMapIso', leftHomologyIso,
RightHomologyData.homologyIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso,
rightHomologyMapIso', rightHomologyIso]
simp only [assoc, ← leftHomologyMap'_comp_assoc, id_comp, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp]
variable (S)
@[reassoc]
lemma leftRightHomologyComparison_fac [S.HasHomology] :
S.leftRightHomologyComparison = S.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫ S.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
simpa only [LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_leftHomologyData, Iso.symm_inv,
RightHomologyData.homologyIso_rightHomologyData, Iso.symm_hom] using
leftRightHomologyComparison'_fac S.leftHomologyData S.rightHomologyData
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.right_homologyIso_eq_left_homologyIso_trans_iso
(h : S.HomologyData) [S.HasHomology] :
h.right.homologyIso = h.left.homologyIso ≪≫ h.iso := by
suffices h.iso = h.left.homologyIso.symm ≪≫ h.right.homologyIso by
rw [this, Iso.self_symm_id_assoc]
ext
dsimp
rw [← leftRightHomologyComparison'_fac, leftRightHomologyComparison'_eq]
lemma hasHomology_of_isIso_leftRightHomologyComparison'
(h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
[IsIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂)] :
S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂)
lemma hasHomology_of_isIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison [S.HasLeftHomology]
[S.HasRightHomology] [h : IsIso S.leftRightHomologyComparison] :
S.HasHomology := by
haveI : IsIso (leftRightHomologyComparison' S.leftHomologyData S.rightHomologyData) := h
exact hasHomology_of_isIso_leftRightHomologyComparison' S.leftHomologyData S.rightHomologyData
section
variable [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
@[reassoc]
lemma LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_hom_naturality
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ =
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom := by
dsimp [homologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso, homologyMap, homologyMap', leftHomologyIso]
simp only [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_inv_naturality
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
h₁.homologyIso.inv ≫ homologyMap φ =
leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [homologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso, homologyMap, homologyMap', leftHomologyIso]
simp only [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyIso_hom_naturality :
S₁.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫ homologyMap φ =
leftHomologyMap φ ≫ S₂.leftHomologyIso.hom := by
simpa only [LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_leftHomologyData, Iso.symm_inv] using
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_inv_naturality φ S₁.leftHomologyData S₂.leftHomologyData
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyIso_inv_naturality :
S₁.leftHomologyIso.inv ≫ leftHomologyMap φ =
homologyMap φ ≫ S₂.leftHomologyIso.inv := by
simpa only [LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_leftHomologyData, Iso.symm_inv] using
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_hom_naturality φ S₁.leftHomologyData S₂.leftHomologyData
@[reassoc]
lemma RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_hom_naturality
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ =
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom := by
rw [← cancel_epi h₁.homologyIso.inv, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
← cancel_epi (leftRightHomologyComparison' S₁.leftHomologyData h₁),
← leftRightHomologyComparison'_naturality φ S₁.leftHomologyData h₁ S₂.leftHomologyData h₂,
← cancel_epi (S₁.leftHomologyData.homologyIso.hom),
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_hom_naturality_assoc,
leftRightHomologyComparison'_fac, leftRightHomologyComparison'_fac, assoc,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
lemma RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_inv_naturality
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
h₁.homologyIso.inv ≫ homologyMap φ =
rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h₂.homologyIso.hom, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, comp_id,
← RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_hom_naturality φ h₁ h₂, Iso.inv_hom_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma rightHomologyIso_hom_naturality :
S₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ homologyMap φ =
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ S₂.rightHomologyIso.hom := by
simpa only [RightHomologyData.homologyIso_rightHomologyData, Iso.symm_inv] using
RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_inv_naturality φ S₁.rightHomologyData S₂.rightHomologyData
@[reassoc]
lemma rightHomologyIso_inv_naturality :
S₁.rightHomologyIso.inv ≫ rightHomologyMap φ =
homologyMap φ ≫ S₂.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
simpa only [RightHomologyData.homologyIso_rightHomologyData, Iso.symm_inv] using
RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_hom_naturality φ S₁.rightHomologyData S₂.rightHomologyData
end
variable (C)
/-- We shall say that a category `C` is a category with homology when all short complexes
have homology. -/
class _root_.CategoryTheory.CategoryWithHomology : Prop where
hasHomology : ∀ (S : ShortComplex C), S.HasHomology
attribute [instance] CategoryWithHomology.hasHomology
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : CategoryWithHomology Cᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun S => HasHomology.mk' S.unop.homologyData.op⟩
/-- The homology functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C` for a category `C` with homology. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] :
ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.homology
map f := homologyMap f
variable {C}
instance isIso_homologyMap'_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
IsIso (homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) := by
dsimp only [homologyMap']
infer_instance
lemma isIso_homologyMap_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
(h₁ : Epi φ.τ₁) (h₂ : IsIso φ.τ₂) (h₃ : Mono φ.τ₃) :
IsIso (homologyMap φ) := by
dsimp only [homologyMap]
infer_instance
instance isIso_homologyMap_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
IsIso (homologyMap φ) :=
isIso_homologyMap_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono' φ inferInstance inferInstance inferInstance
instance isIso_homologyFunctor_map_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [CategoryWithHomology C]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
IsIso ((homologyFunctor C).map φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (homologyMap φ))
instance isIso_homologyMap_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] [IsIso φ] :
IsIso (homologyMap φ) := by
dsimp only [homologyMap, homologyMap']
infer_instance
section
variable (S) {A : C}
variable [HasHomology S]
/-- The canonical morphism `S.cycles ⟶ S.homology` for a short complex `S` that has homology. -/
noncomputable def homologyπ : S.cycles ⟶ S.homology :=
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ S.leftHomologyIso.hom
/-- The canonical morphism `S.homology ⟶ S.opcycles` for a short complex `S` that has homology. -/
noncomputable def homologyι : S.homology ⟶ S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyIso.inv ≫ S.rightHomologyι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv :
S.homologyπ ≫ S.leftHomologyIso.inv = S.leftHomologyπ := by
dsimp only [homologyπ]
simp only [assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_homologyι :
S.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ S.homologyι = S.rightHomologyι := by
dsimp only [homologyι]
simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_comp_homologyπ :
S.toCycles ≫ S.homologyπ = 0 := by
dsimp only [homologyπ]
simp only [toCycles_comp_leftHomologyπ_assoc, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles :
S.homologyι ≫ S.fromOpcycles = 0 := by
dsimp only [homologyι]
simp only [assoc, rightHomologyι_comp_fromOpcycles, comp_zero]
/-- The homology `S.homology` of a short complex is
the cokernel of the morphism `S.toCycles : S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsCokernel :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.homologyπ S.toCycles_comp_homologyπ) :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit S.leftHomologyIsCokernel
(Cofork.ext S.leftHomologyIso rfl)
/-- The homology `S.homology` of a short complex is
the kernel of the morphism `S.fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsKernel :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.homologyι S.homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit S.rightHomologyIsKernel
(Fork.ext S.rightHomologyIso (by simp))
instance : Epi S.homologyπ :=
Limits.epi_of_isColimit_cofork (S.homologyIsCokernel)
instance : Mono S.homologyι :=
Limits.mono_of_isLimit_fork (S.homologyIsKernel)
/-- Given a morphism `k : S.cycles ⟶ A` such that `S.toCycles ≫ k = 0`, this is the
induced morphism `S.homology ⟶ A`. -/
noncomputable def descHomology (k : S.cycles ⟶ A) (hk : S.toCycles ≫ k = 0) :
S.homology ⟶ A :=
S.homologyIsCokernel.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
/-- Given a morphism `k : A ⟶ S.opcycles` such that `k ≫ S.fromOpcycles = 0`, this is the
induced morphism `A ⟶ S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def liftHomology (k : A ⟶ S.opcycles) (hk : k ≫ S.fromOpcycles = 0) :
A ⟶ S.homology :=
S.homologyIsKernel.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_descHomology (k : S.cycles ⟶ A) (hk : S.toCycles ≫ k = 0) :
S.homologyπ ≫ S.descHomology k hk = k :=
Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc S.homologyIsCokernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftHomology_ι (k : A ⟶ S.opcycles) (hk : k ≫ S.fromOpcycles = 0) :
S.liftHomology k hk ≫ S.homologyι = k :=
Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι S.homologyIsKernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] :
S₁.homologyπ ≫ homologyMap φ = cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.homologyπ := by
simp only [← cancel_mono S₂.leftHomologyIso.inv, assoc, ← leftHomologyIso_inv_naturality φ,
homologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv]
simp only [homologyπ, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, leftHomologyπ_naturality]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] :
homologyMap φ ≫ S₂.homologyι = S₁.homologyι ≫ S₁.opcyclesMap φ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi S₁.rightHomologyIso.hom, rightHomologyIso_hom_naturality_assoc φ,
rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_homologyι, rightHomologyι_naturality]
simp only [homologyι, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homology_π_ι :
S.homologyπ ≫ S.homologyι = S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp only [homologyπ, homologyι]
simpa only [assoc, S.leftRightHomologyComparison_fac] using S.π_leftRightHomologyComparison_ι
/-- The homology of a short complex `S` identifies to the kernel of the induced morphism
`cokernel S.f ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsoKernelDesc [HasCokernel S.f]
[HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.homology ≅ kernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero) :=
S.rightHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ S.rightHomologyIsoKernelDesc
/-- The homology of a short complex `S` identifies to the cokernel of the induced morphism
`S.X₁ ⟶ kernel S.g`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsoCokernelLift [HasKernel S.g]
[HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.homology ≅ cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero) :=
S.leftHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ S.leftHomologyIsoCokernelLift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma LeftHomologyData.homologyπ_comp_homologyIso_hom (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.homologyπ ≫ h.homologyIso.hom = h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.π := by
dsimp only [homologyπ, homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
leftHomologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_hom]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma LeftHomologyData.π_comp_homologyIso_inv (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.π ≫ h.homologyIso.inv = h.cyclesIso.inv ≫ S.homologyπ := by
dsimp only [homologyπ, homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, Iso.symm_inv, π_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma RightHomologyData.homologyIso_inv_comp_homologyι (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.homologyIso.inv ≫ S.homologyι = h.ι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp only [homologyι, homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, Iso.symm_inv, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma RightHomologyData.homologyIso_hom_comp_ι (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.homologyIso.hom ≫ h.ι = S.homologyι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom := by
dsimp only [homologyι, homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, assoc, rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_ι]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_hom_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.homologyIso.hom ≫ h.leftHomologyIso.inv = S.leftHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp only [homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso_hom_comp_homologyIso_inv (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫ h.homologyIso.inv = S.leftHomologyIso.hom := by
dsimp only [homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, Iso.symm_inv, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma RightHomologyData.homologyIso_hom_comp_rightHomologyIso_inv (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.homologyIso.hom ≫ h.rightHomologyIso.inv = S.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp only [homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_homologyIso_inv (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ h.homologyIso.inv = S.rightHomologyIso.hom := by
dsimp only [homologyIso]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, Iso.symm_inv, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
lemma comp_homologyMap_comp [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
h₁.π ≫ h₁.homologyIso.inv ≫ homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom ≫ h₂.ι =
h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p := by
dsimp only [LeftHomologyData.homologyIso, RightHomologyData.homologyIso,
Iso.symm, Iso.trans, Iso.refl, leftHomologyIso, rightHomologyIso,
leftHomologyMapIso', rightHomologyMapIso',
LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso, RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso,
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso,
homologyMap, homologyMap']
simp only [assoc, rightHomologyι_naturality', rightHomologyι_naturality'_assoc,
leftHomologyπ_naturality'_assoc, HomologyData.comm_assoc, p_opcyclesMap'_assoc,
id_τ₂, p_opcyclesMap', id_comp, cyclesMap'_i_assoc]
@[reassoc]
lemma π_homologyMap_ι [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) :
S₁.homologyπ ≫ homologyMap φ ≫ S₂.homologyι = S₁.iCycles ≫ φ.τ₂ ≫ S₂.pOpcycles := by
simp only [homologyι_naturality, homology_π_ι_assoc, p_opcyclesMap]
end
variable (S)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `S.op.homology ≅ Opposite.op S.homology` when a short
complex `S` has homology. -/
noncomputable def homologyOpIso [S.HasHomology] :
S.op.homology ≅ Opposite.op S.homology :=
S.op.leftHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ S.leftHomologyOpIso ≪≫ S.rightHomologyIso.symm.op
lemma homologyMap'_op : (homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂).op =
h₂.iso.inv.op ≫ homologyMap' (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op ≫ h₁.iso.hom.op :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by
dsimp
have γ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.homologyMap'_eq, γ.op.homologyMap'_eq, HomologyData.op_left,
HomologyMapData.op_left, RightHomologyMapData.op_φH, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, assoc,
← γ.comm_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id])
lemma homologyMap_op [HasHomology S₁] [HasHomology S₂] :
(homologyMap φ).op =
(S₂.homologyOpIso).inv ≫ homologyMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.homologyOpIso).hom := by
dsimp only [homologyMap, homologyOpIso]
rw [homologyMap'_op]
dsimp only [Iso.symm, Iso.trans, Iso.op, Iso.refl, rightHomologyIso, leftHomologyIso,
leftHomologyOpIso, leftHomologyMapIso', rightHomologyMapIso',
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, homologyMap']
simp only [assoc, rightHomologyMap'_op, op_comp, ← leftHomologyMap'_comp_assoc, id_comp,
opMap_id, comp_id, HomologyData.op_left]
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyOpIso_hom_naturality [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] :
homologyMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.homologyOpIso).hom =
S₂.homologyOpIso.hom ≫ (homologyMap φ).op := by
simp [homologyMap_op]
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyOpIso_inv_naturality [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] :
(homologyMap φ).op ≫ (S₁.homologyOpIso).inv =
S₂.homologyOpIso.inv ≫ homologyMap (opMap φ) := by
simp [homologyMap_op]
variable (C)
/-- The natural isomorphism `(homologyFunctor C).op ≅ opFunctor C ⋙ homologyFunctor Cᵒᵖ`
which relates the homology in `C` and in `Cᵒᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorOpNatIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
(homologyFunctor C).op ≅ opFunctor C ⋙ homologyFunctor Cᵒᵖ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun S => S.unop.homologyOpIso.symm)
(fun _ ↦ homologyOpIso_inv_naturality _)
|
variable {C} {A : C}
lemma liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary [S.HasHomology]
(k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Homology.lean | 1,058 | 1,062 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle
/-!
# Closure, interior, and frontier of preimages under `re` and `im`
In this fact we use the fact that `ℂ` is naturally homeomorphic to `ℝ × ℝ` to deduce some
topological properties of `Complex.re` and `Complex.im`.
## Main statements
Each statement about `Complex.re` listed below has a counterpart about `Complex.im`.
* `Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re`: `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial
topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`;
* `Complex.isOpenMap_re`, `Complex.isQuotientMap_re`: in particular, `Complex.re` is an open map
and is a quotient map;
* `Complex.interior_preimage_re`, `Complex.closure_preimage_re`, `Complex.frontier_preimage_re`:
formulas for `interior (Complex.re ⁻¹' s)` etc;
* `Complex.interior_setOf_re_le` etc: particular cases of the above formulas in the cases when `s`
is one of the infinite intervals `Set.Ioi a`, `Set.Ici a`, `Set.Iio a`, and `Set.Iic a`,
formulated as `interior {z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a} = {z | z.re < a}` etc.
## Tags
complex, real part, imaginary part, closure, interior, frontier
-/
open Set Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
/-- `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ re :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- `Complex.im` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ im :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.trans (Homeomorph.prodComm ℝ ℝ), fun _ => rfl⟩
theorem isOpenMap_re : IsOpenMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isOpenMap_im : IsOpenMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isQuotientMap_re : IsQuotientMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_re := isQuotientMap_re
theorem isQuotientMap_im : IsQuotientMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_im := isQuotientMap_im
theorem interior_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : interior (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem interior_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : interior (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : closure (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : closure (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_im _).symm
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | a < z.re } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | a < z.im } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | a ≤ z.re } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | a ≤ z.im } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_im (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_im (Ioi a)
theorem closure_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : closure (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_closure] using @closure_prod_eq _ _ _ _ s t
theorem interior_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : interior (s ×ℂ t) = interior s ×ℂ interior t := by
rw [reProdIm, reProdIm, interior_inter, interior_preimage_re, interior_preimage_im]
theorem frontier_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) :
frontier (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_frontier] using frontier_prod_eq s t
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_le_im (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ b ≤ im z } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ b ≤ im z } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, frontier_Ici] using frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Ici b)
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_im_le (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z ≤ b } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ im z ≤ b } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, closure_Iic, frontier_Ici, frontier_Iic] using
frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Iic b)
end Complex
open Complex Metric
variable {s t : Set ℝ}
theorem IsOpen.reProdIm (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ℂ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_re).inter (ht.preimage continuous_im)
theorem IsClosed.reProdIm (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ×ℂ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_re).inter (ht.preimage continuous_im)
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.reProdIm (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s ×ℂ t) :=
antilipschitz_equivRealProd.isBounded_preimage (hs.prod ht)
section continuity
variable {α ι : Type*}
protected lemma TendstoUniformlyOn.re {f : ι → α → ℂ} {p : Filter ι} {g : α → ℂ} {K : Set α}
(hf : TendstoUniformlyOn f g p K) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n x => (f n x).re) (fun y => (g y).re) p K := by
apply UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn uniformlyContinuous_re hf
| protected lemma TendstoUniformly.re {f : ι → α → ℂ} {p : Filter ι} {g : α → ℂ}
(hf : TendstoUniformly f g p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n x => (f n x).re) (fun y => (g y).re) p := by
apply UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly uniformlyContinuous_re hf
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/ReImTopology.lean | 193 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, Doga Can Sertbas
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Schnirelmann density
We define the Schnirelmann density of a set `A` of natural numbers as
$inf_{n > 0} |A ∩ {1,...,n}| / n$. As this density is very sensitive to changes in small values,
we must exclude `0` from the infimum, and from the intersection.
## Main statements
* Simple bounds on the Schnirelmann density, that it is between 0 and 1 are given in
`schnirelmannDensity_nonneg` and `schnirelmannDensity_le_one`.
* `schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem`: If `k ∉ A`, the density can be easily upper-bounded by
`1 - k⁻¹`
## Implementation notes
Despite the definition being noncomputable, we include a decidable instance argument, since this
makes the definition easier to use in explicit cases.
Further, we use `Finset.Ioc` rather than a set intersection since the set is finite by construction,
which reduces the proof obligations later that would arise with `Nat.card`.
## TODO
* Give other calculations of the density, for example powers and their sumsets.
* Define other densities like the lower and upper asymptotic density, and the natural density,
and show how these relate to the Schnirelmann density.
* Show that if the sum of two densities is at least one, the sumset covers the positive naturals.
* Prove Schnirelmann's theorem and Mann's theorem on the subadditivity of this density.
## References
* [Ruzsa, Imre, *Sumsets and structure*][ruzsa2009]
-/
open Finset
/-- The Schnirelmann density is defined as the infimum of |A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n as n ranges over
the positive naturals. -/
noncomputable def schnirelmannDensity (A : Set ℕ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] : ℝ :=
⨅ n : {n : ℕ // 0 < n}, #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n
section
variable {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_nonneg : 0 ≤ schnirelmannDensity A :=
Real.iInf_nonneg (fun _ => by positivity)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_div {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩ (⟨n, hn.bot_lt⟩ : {n : ℕ // 0 < n})
/--
For any natural `n`, the Schnirelmann density multiplied by `n` is bounded by `|A ∩ {1, ..., n}|`.
Note this property fails for the natural density.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_mul_le_card_filter {n : ℕ} :
schnirelmannDensity A * n ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
exact (le_div_iff₀ (by positivity)).1 (schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn)
/--
To show the Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `x`, it suffices to show
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n ≤ x`, for any chosen positive value of `n`.
We provide `n` explicitly here to make this lemma more easily usable in `apply` or `refine`.
This lemma is analogous to `ciInf_le_of_le`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hx : #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n ≤ x) : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x :=
(schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn).trans hx
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_one : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 :=
schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le 1 one_ne_zero <|
by rw [Nat.cast_one, div_one, Nat.cast_le_one]; exact card_filter_le _ _
/--
If `k` is omitted from the set, its Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `1 - k⁻¹`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem {k : ℕ} (hk : k ∉ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 - (k⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hk'
· simpa using schnirelmannDensity_le_one
apply schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le k hk'.ne'
rw [← one_div, one_sub_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hk').ne']
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pred hk', Nat.cast_le]
suffices {a ∈ Ioc 0 k | a ∈ A} ⊆ Ioo 0 k from (card_le_card this).trans_eq (by simp)
rw [← Ioo_insert_right hk', filter_insert, if_neg hk]
exact filter_subset _ _
/-- The Schnirelmann density of a set not containing `1` is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (h : 1 ∉ A) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 :=
((schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem h).trans (by simp)).antisymm schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
/-- The Schnirelmann density is increasing with the set. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_subset {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A ⊆ B) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ schnirelmannDensity B :=
ciInf_mono ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ by positivity⟩ fun _ ↦ by
gcongr; exact h
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` is `1` if and only if `A` contains all the positive naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff : schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ {0}ᶜ ⊆ A := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_right schnirelmannDensity_le_one]
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not, not_le]
simp only [Set.not_subset, forall_exists_index, true_and, and_imp, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
intro x hx hx'
apply (schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem hx').trans_lt
simpa only [one_div, sub_lt_self_iff, inv_pos, Nat.cast_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero] using hx
· intro h
refine le_ciInf fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => ?_
rw [one_le_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), Nat.cast_le, filter_true_of_mem, Nat.card_Ioc, Nat.sub_zero]
rintro x hx
exact h (mem_Ioc.1 hx).1.ne'
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` containing `0` is `1` if and only if `A` is the naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (hA : 0 ∈ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ A = Set.univ := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· refine fun h => Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· exact hA
· exact h hx
· rintro rfl
exact Set.subset_univ {0}ᶜ
lemma le_schnirelmannDensity_iff {x : ℝ} :
x ≤ schnirelmannDensity A ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
(le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩).trans Subtype.forall
lemma schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A < x ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x := by
rw [← not_le, le_schnirelmannDensity_iff]; simp
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x ↔
∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr' {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)]
(h : ∀ n > 0, n ∈ A ↔ n ∈ B) : schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity, schnirelmannDensity]; congr; ext ⟨n, hn⟩; congr 3; ext x; aesop
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by adding `0`. -/
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_insert_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ insert 0 A)] :
schnirelmannDensity (insert 0 A) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by removing `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_diff_singleton_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ A \ {0})] :
schnirelmannDensity (A \ {0}) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A = B) :
schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/--
If the Schnirelmann density is `0`, there is a positive natural for which
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n < ε`, for any positive `ε`.
Note this cannot be improved to `∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop`, as can be seen by `A = {1}ᶜ`.
-/
lemma exists_of_schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hA : schnirelmannDensity A = 0) :
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < ε := by
by_contra! h
rw [← le_schnirelmannDensity_iff] at h
linarith
end
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_empty : schnirelmannDensity ∅ = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (by simp)
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finset is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finset (A : Finset ℕ) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall, zero_add]
intro ε hε
wlog hε₁ : ε ≤ 1 generalizing ε
· obtain ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ := this 1 zero_lt_one le_rfl
exact ⟨n, hn, hn'.trans_le (le_of_not_le hε₁)⟩
let n : ℕ := ⌊#A / ε⌋₊ + 1
have hn : 0 < n := Nat.succ_pos _
use n, hn
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), ← div_lt_iff₀' hε, Nat.cast_add_one]
exact (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).trans_le' <| by gcongr; simp [subset_iff]
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finite set is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finite {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] (hA : A.Finite) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by simpa using schnirelmannDensity_finset hA.toFinset
| @[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_univ : schnirelmannDensity Set.univ = 1 :=
(schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (by simp)).2 (by simp)
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Schnirelmann.lean | 206 | 207 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.NoZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-! # Formal power series - Inverses
If the constant coefficient of a formal (univariate) power series is invertible,
then this formal power series is invertible.
(See the discussion in `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` for
the construction.)
Formal (univariate) power series over a local ring form a local ring.
Formal (univariate) power series over a field form a discrete valuation ring, and a normalization
monoid. The definition `residueFieldOfPowerSeries` provides the isomorphism between the residue
field of `k⟦X⟧` and `k`, when `k` is a field.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Auxiliary function used for computing inverse of a power series -/
protected def inv.aux : R → R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.inv.aux
theorem coeff_inv_aux (n : ℕ) (a : R) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) =
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 := by
rw [coeff, inv.aux, MvPowerSeries.coeff_inv_aux]
simp only [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
split_ifs; · rfl
congr 1
symm
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun (a, b) ↦ (single () a, single () b))
fun (f, g) ↦ (f (), g ())
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _hij
obtain H | H := le_or_lt n j
· aesop
rw [if_pos H, if_pos]
· rfl
refine ⟨?_, fun hh ↦ H.not_le ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟩
simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using le_of_lt H
· simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using hh ()
/-- A formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible. -/
def invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit φ u
theorem coeff_invOfUnit (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
coeff R n (invOfUnit φ u) =
if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹
else
-↑u⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (invOfUnit φ u) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹ : R) φ
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
constantCoeff R (invOfUnit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invOfUnit, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff R φ = u) :
φ * invOfUnit φ u = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_invOfUnit φ u <| h
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_mul (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff R φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u * φ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_mul φ u h
theorem isUnit_iff_constantCoeff {φ : R⟦X⟧} :
IsUnit φ ↔ IsUnit (constantCoeff R φ) :=
MvPowerSeries.isUnit_iff_constantCoeff
/-- Two ways of removing the constant coefficient of a power series are the same. -/
theorem sub_const_eq_shift_mul_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ - C R (constantCoeff R φ) = (mk fun p ↦ coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_shift_mul_X_add_const φ)
theorem sub_const_eq_X_mul_shift (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ - C R (constantCoeff R φ) = X * mk fun p ↦ coeff R (p + 1) φ :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_X_mul_shift_add_const φ)
end Ring
section Field
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
/-- The inverse 1/f of a power series f defined over a field -/
protected def inv : k⟦X⟧ → k⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.inv
instance : Inv k⟦X⟧ := ⟨PowerSeries.inv⟩
theorem inv_eq_inv_aux (φ : k⟦X⟧) : φ⁻¹ = inv.aux (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ φ :=
rfl
theorem coeff_inv (n) (φ : k⟦X⟧) :
coeff k n φ⁻¹ =
if n = 0 then (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹
else
-(constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff k x.1 φ * coeff k x.2 φ⁻¹ else 0 := by
rw [inv_eq_inv_aux, coeff_inv_aux n (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ φ]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_inv (φ : k⟦X⟧) : constantCoeff k φ⁻¹ = (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_inv φ
theorem inv_eq_zero {φ : k⟦X⟧} : φ⁻¹ = 0 ↔ constantCoeff k φ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_zero
theorem zero_inv : (0 : k⟦X⟧)⁻¹ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.zero_inv
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) :
invOfUnit φ (Units.mk0 _ h) = φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq' (φ : k⟦X⟧) (u : Units k) (h : constantCoeff k φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u = φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_eq' φ _ h
@[simp]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) : φ * φ⁻¹ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_cancel φ h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) : φ⁻¹ * φ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_mul_cancel φ h
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq {φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k φ₃ ≠ 0) :
φ₁ = φ₂ * φ₃⁻¹ ↔ φ₁ * φ₃ = φ₂ :=
MvPowerSeries.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq h
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
φ = ψ⁻¹ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one h
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
ψ⁻¹ = φ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one h
protected theorem mul_inv_rev (φ ψ : k⟦X⟧) : (φ * ψ)⁻¹ = ψ⁻¹ * φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_rev _ _
instance : InvOneClass k⟦X⟧ :=
{ inferInstanceAs <| InvOneClass <| MvPowerSeries Unit k with }
@[simp]
theorem C_inv (r : k) : (C k r)⁻¹ = C k r⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.C_inv _
@[simp]
theorem X_inv : (X : k⟦X⟧)⁻¹ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_inv _
theorem smul_inv (r : k) (φ : k⟦X⟧) : (r • φ)⁻¹ = r⁻¹ • φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.smul_inv _ _
/-- `firstUnitCoeff` is the non-zero coefficient whose index is `f.order`, seen as a unit of the
field. It is obtained using `divided_by_X_pow_order`, defined in `PowerSeries.Order`. -/
def firstUnitCoeff {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) : kˣ :=
have : Invertible (constantCoeff k (divXPowOrder f)) := by
apply invertibleOfNonzero
simpa [constantCoeff_divXPowOrder_eq_zero_iff.not]
unitOfInvertible (constantCoeff k (divXPowOrder f))
/-- `Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order` is the inverse of the element obtained by diving a non-zero power
series by the largest power of `X` dividing it. Useful to create a term of type `Units`, done in
`Unit_divided_by_X_pow_order` -/
def Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) : k⟦X⟧ :=
invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf)
@[simp]
theorem Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_rightInv {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
divXPowOrder f * Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf = 1 :=
mul_invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf) rfl
@[simp]
theorem Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_leftInv {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf * divXPowOrder f = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf) rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- `Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order` is the unit power series obtained by dividing a non-zero
power series by the largest power of `X` that divides it. -/
def Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order (f : k⟦X⟧) : k⟦X⟧ˣ :=
if hf : f = 0 then 1
else
{ val := divXPowOrder f
inv := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf
val_inv := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_rightInv hf
inv_val := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_leftInv hf }
theorem isUnit_divided_by_X_pow_order {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (divXPowOrder f) :=
⟨Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f,
by simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_neg hf, Units.val_mk]⟩
theorem Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order_nonzero {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
↑(Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f) = divXPowOrder f := by
simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_neg hf, Units.val_mk]
@[simp]
theorem Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order_zero : Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order (0 : k⟦X⟧) = 1 := by
simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_pos]
theorem eq_divided_by_X_pow_order_Iff_Unit {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f = divXPowOrder f ↔ IsUnit f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h]; exact isUnit_divided_by_X_pow_order hf, fun h ↦ by
have : f.order = 0 := by
simp [order_zero_of_unit h]
conv_lhs => rw [← X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder (f := f), this, ENat.toNat_zero,
pow_zero, one_mul]⟩
end Field
section IsLocalRing
variable {S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S) [IsLocalHom f]
@[instance]
theorem map.isLocalHom : IsLocalHom (map f) :=
MvPowerSeries.map.isLocalHom f
variable [IsLocalRing R]
instance : IsLocalRing R⟦X⟧ :=
{ inferInstanceAs <| IsLocalRing <| MvPowerSeries Unit R with }
end IsLocalRing
section IsDiscreteValuationRing
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
open IsDiscreteValuationRing
theorem hasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization :
HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization k⟦X⟧ :=
⟨X, And.intro X_irreducible
(by
intro f hf
use f.order.toNat
use Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f
simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order_nonzero hf]
exact X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder)⟩
instance : UniqueFactorizationMonoid k⟦X⟧ :=
hasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization.toUniqueFactorizationMonoid
instance : IsDiscreteValuationRing k⟦X⟧ :=
ofHasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization hasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
instance isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing k⟦X⟧ :=
PrincipalIdealRing.isNoetherianRing
/-- The maximal ideal of `k⟦X⟧` is generated by `X`. -/
theorem maximalIdeal_eq_span_X : IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (k⟦X⟧) = Ideal.span {X} := by
have hX : (Ideal.span {(X : k⟦X⟧)}).IsMaximal := by
rw [Ideal.isMaximal_iff]
constructor
· rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact Prime.not_dvd_one X_prime
· intro I f hI hfX hfI
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, X_dvd_iff] at hfX
have hfI0 : C k (f 0) ∈ I := by
have : C k (f 0) = f - (f - C k (f 0)) := by rw [sub_sub_cancel]
rw [this]
apply Ideal.sub_mem I hfI
| apply hI
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, X_dvd_iff, map_sub, constantCoeff_C, ←
coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, sub_eq_zero, coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
rfl
rw [← Ideal.eq_top_iff_one]
apply Ideal.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem I hfI0 (IsUnit.map (C k) (Ne.isUnit hfX))
rw [IsLocalRing.eq_maximalIdeal hX]
instance : NormalizationMonoid k⟦X⟧ where
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Inverse.lean | 315 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
variable {K}
lemma den_mem_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(algebraMap R₁ K) (I.den : R₁) ∈ I⁻¹ := by
rw [mem_inv_iff hI]
intro i hi
rw [← Algebra.smul_def (I.den : R₁) i, ← mem_coe, coe_one]
suffices Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) I.num ≤ 1 from
this <| (den_mul_self_eq_num I).symm ▸ smul_mem_pointwise_smul i I.den I.coeToSubmodule hi
apply le_trans <| map_mono (show I.num ≤ 1 by simp only [Ideal.one_eq_top, le_top, bot_eq_zero])
rw [Ideal.one_eq_top, Submodule.map_top, one_eq_range]
lemma num_le_mul_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I.num ≤ I * I⁻¹ := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, num_zero_eq <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K, zero_mul, zero_eq_bot,
coeIdeal_bot]
· rw [mul_comm, ← den_mul_self_eq_num']
exact mul_right_mono I <| spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.2 (den_mem_inv hI)
lemma bot_lt_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < I * I⁻¹ :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (coeIdeal_ne_zero.2 (hI ∘ num_eq_zero_iff.1)).bot_lt I.num_le_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : IsIdempotentElem I := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, adjoinIntegral_coe, I]
rw [(Algebra.adjoin A {x}).isIdempotentElem_toSubmodule]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
include h
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
((P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) this
_ = M := ?_
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne,
one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
· rw [← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul]
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebraMap _ _ y` for some `y`.
intro x hx
have le_one : (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ 1 := by
rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A)).mpr hM.le)
obtain ⟨y, _hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp (le_one hx)
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt hM
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := mul_mem_mul (mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal A⁰).mp zy_mem
rw [IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A) zy_eq] at hzy
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ (Or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)⟩
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`IsDedekindDomainInv` and `IsDedekindDomain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain : IsDedekindDomain A :=
{ h.isNoetherianRing, h.dimensionLEOne, h.integrallyClosed with }
end IsDedekindDomainInv
end IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable {A K}
theorem one_mem_inv_coe_ideal [IsDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI)]
intro y hy
rw [one_mul]
exact FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_le_one hy
/-- Specialization of `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : Ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
theorem exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [IsDedekindDomain A] (hNF : ¬IsField A)
{I M : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.IsMaximal] :
∃ Z : Multiset (PrimeSpectrum A),
(M ::ₘ Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧
¬Multiset.prod (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal) ≤ I := by
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := PrimeSpectrum.exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ :=
wellFounded_lt.has_min
{Z | (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥}
⟨Z₀, hZ₀.1, hZ₀.2⟩
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := hM.isPrime.multiset_prod_le.mp (hZI.trans hIM)
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ'
classical
have := Multiset.map_erase PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal (fun _ _ => PrimeSpectrum.ext) P Z
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.asIdeal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥ := by
rwa [Ne, ← Multiset.cons_erase hPZ', Multiset.prod_cons, Ideal.mul_eq_bot, not_or, ←
this] at hprodZ
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (P.isPrime.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM
subst hPM'
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert hZI
rw [this, Multiset.cons_erase hPZ']
· refine fun h => h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, ?_⟩ (Multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ)
exact hZP0
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
lemma not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A}
(hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ¬(I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) ≤ 1 := by
have hNF : ¬IsField A := fun h ↦ letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).elim hI0 hI1
wlog hM : I.IsMaximal generalizing I
· rcases I.exists_le_maximal hI1 with ⟨M, hmax, hIM⟩
have hMbot : M ≠ ⊥ := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne'
refine mt (le_trans <| inv_anti_mono ?_ ?_ ?_) (this hMbot hmax.ne_top hmax) <;>
simpa only [coeIdeal_ne_zero, coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal]
have hI0 : ⊥ < I := I.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF
obtain ⟨⟨a, haI⟩, ha0⟩ := Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt hI0
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0
let J : Ideal A := Ideal.span {a}
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0
have hJI : J ≤ I := I.span_singleton_le_iff_mem.2 haI
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJI
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := SetLike.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle
have hnz_fa : algebraMap A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) a) ha0
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine Set.not_subset.2 ⟨algebraMap A K b * (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff ?_).mpr ?_, ?_⟩
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0.ne'
· rintro y₀ hy₀
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy₀
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J := by
apply hle
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at h_yb
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hnz_fa, mul_one]
apply coe_mem_one
· refine mt (mem_one_iff _).mp ?_
rintro ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← RingHom.map_mul] at h₂_abs
have := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', IsFractionRing.injective A K h₂_abs⟩
contradiction
theorem exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x ∉ (1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :=
Set.not_subset.1 <| not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot hI0 hI1
theorem mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI : (I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1) : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ J : Ideal A, (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) = I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp mul_one_div_le_one
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥
· subst hJ0
refine absurd ?_ hI0
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K, hJ]
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤
· rw [← hJ, hJ1, coeIdeal_top]
exact (not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot (K := K) hJ0 hJ1 (hJ ▸ hI)).elim
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
theorem coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : IsDedekindDomain A] (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0
by_cases hJ0 : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0
· rw [hJ0, inv_zero']; exact zero_le _
intro x hx
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices x ∈ integralClosure A K by
rwa [IsIntegrallyClosed.integralClosure_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range,
← mem_one_iff] at this
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw [mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg]
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
intro b hb
rw [mem_inv_iff (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0)]
dsimp only at hx
rw [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ0] at hx
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at hx ⊢
intro y hy
exact hx _ (mul_mem_mul hy hb)
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : A[X]` works.
refine ⟨AlgHom.range (Polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
isNoetherian_submodule.mp (isNoetherian (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) _ fun y hy => ?_,
⟨Polynomial.X, Polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (AlgHom.mem_range _).mp hy
rw [Polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ?_
clear hi
induction' i with i ih
· rw [pow_zero]; exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0
· show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)
rw [pow_succ']; exact x_mul_mem _ ih
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : Ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
suffices h₂ : I * (spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) = 1 by
rw [mul_inv_cancel_iff]
exact ⟨spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹, h₂⟩
subst hJ
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
· exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap A K)).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) _) ha
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne)
theorem mul_right_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' := by
intro I I'
constructor
· intro h
convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h <;> dsimp only <;>
rw [mul_assoc, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
· exact fun h => mul_right_mono J h
theorem mul_left_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} :
J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' := by convert mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
theorem mul_right_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (· * I) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm
theorem mul_left_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (I * ·) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm
/-- This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem div_eq_mul_inv [IsDedekindDomain A] (I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero]
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp ?_) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr ?_)
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le]
intro x hx y hy
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx
exact hx y hy
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
end FractionalIdeal
/-- `IsDedekindDomain` and `IsDedekindDomainInv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv [IsDomain A] :
IsDedekindDomain A ↔ IsDedekindDomainInv A :=
⟨fun _h _I hI => FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hI, fun h => h.isDedekindDomain⟩
end Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
#adaptation_note /-- 2025-03-29 for lean4#7717 had to add `mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero` field.
TODO(kmill) There is trouble calculating the type of the `IsLeftCancelMulZero` parent. -/
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`FractionalIdeal.semifield`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := mul_left_cancel₀
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel₀ hI']
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h)
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hI', one_mul]⟩
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wf := by
have : WellFoundedGT (Ideal A) := inferInstance
convert this.wf
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_isUnit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_isUnit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_intro x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) := .ofUniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`. -/
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_inj_of_not_isUnit (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top) hP).mp i.succ_ne_self)
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
/-- Strengthening of `IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hy
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x _ hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
section Gcd
namespace Ideal
/-! ### GCD and LCM of ideals in a Dedekind domain
We show that the gcd of two ideals in a Dedekind domain is just their supremum,
and the lcm is their infimum, and use this to instantiate `NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)`.
-/
|
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_inf (I J : Ideal A) : (I ⊔ J) * (I ⊓ J) = I * J := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 799 | 801 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Brendan Murphy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Brendan Murphy
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Flat.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.AssociatedPrime.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotSMulTop
/-!
# Lemmas about the `IsSMulRegular` Predicate
For modules over a ring the proposition `IsSMulRegular r M` is equivalent to
`r` being a *non zero-divisor*, i.e. `r • x = 0` only if `x = 0` for `x ∈ M`.
This specific result is `isSMulRegular_iff_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero`.
Lots of results starting from this, especially ones about quotients (which
don't make sense without some algebraic assumptions), are in this file.
We don't pollute the `Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul` file with these because
it's supposed to import a minimal amount of the algebraic hierarchy.
## Tags
module, regular element, commutative algebra
-/
section Congr
variable {R S M N} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {σ : R →+* S} {σ' : S →+* R}
[RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
lemma LinearEquiv.isSMulRegular_congr' [AddCommMonoid N] [Module S N]
(e : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] N) (r : R) : IsSMulRegular M r ↔ IsSMulRegular N (σ r) :=
e.toEquiv.isSMulRegular_congr (e.map_smul' r)
lemma LinearEquiv.isSMulRegular_congr [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
(e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (r : R) : IsSMulRegular M r ↔ IsSMulRegular N r :=
e.isSMulRegular_congr' r
end Congr
variable {R S M M' M'' : Type*}
lemma IsSMulRegular.submodule [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
(N : Submodule R M) (r : R) (h : IsSMulRegular M r) : IsSMulRegular N r :=
h.of_injective N.subtype N.injective_subtype
section TensorProduct
open scoped TensorProduct
variable (M) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M']
[Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module.Flat R M] {r : R}
(h : IsSMulRegular M' r)
include h
lemma IsSMulRegular.lTensor : IsSMulRegular (M ⊗[R] M') r :=
have h1 := congrArg DFunLike.coe (LinearMap.lTensor_smul_action M M' r)
h1.subst (Module.Flat.lTensor_preserves_injective_linearMap _ h)
lemma IsSMulRegular.rTensor : IsSMulRegular (M' ⊗[R] M) r :=
have h1 := congrArg DFunLike.coe (LinearMap.rTensor_smul_action M M' r)
h1.subst (Module.Flat.rTensor_preserves_injective_linearMap _ h)
end TensorProduct
lemma isSMulRegular_algebraMap_iff [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
[AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) :
IsSMulRegular M (algebraMap R S r) ↔ IsSMulRegular M r :=
(Equiv.refl M).isSMulRegular_congr (algebraMap_smul S r)
section Ring
variable (M) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [AddCommGroup M''] [Module R M'']
(N : Submodule R M) (r : R)
lemma isSMulRegular_iff_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero :
IsSMulRegular M r ↔ ∀ x : M, r • x = 0 → x = 0 :=
Iff.trans (Module.toAddMonoidEnd R M r).ker_eq_bot_iff.symm
<| AddSubgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall _
lemma isSMulRegular_iff_mem_nonZeroSMulDivisors :
IsSMulRegular M r ↔ r ∈ nonZeroSMulDivisors R M :=
isSMulRegular_iff_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero M r
variable {M r}
lemma isSMulRegular_of_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero
(h : ∀ x : M, r • x = 0 → x = 0) : IsSMulRegular M r :=
(isSMulRegular_iff_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero M r).mpr h
variable (r)
|
lemma isSMulRegular_on_submodule_iff_mem_imp_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero :
IsSMulRegular N r ↔ ∀ x ∈ N, r • x = 0 → x = 0 :=
Iff.trans (isSMulRegular_iff_smul_eq_zero_imp_eq_zero N r) <|
Iff.trans Subtype.forall <| by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Regular/IsSMulRegular.lean | 94 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untopD_zero_mul a b
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe _
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
map_zero' := toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, toReal_top, mul_zero]
theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
theorem toReal_eq_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal = b.toReal ↔ a = b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simp only [coe_inj, NNReal.coe_inj, coe_toReal]
protected theorem trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal := by
simpa only [or_iff_not_imp_left] using toReal_pos
protected theorem trichotomy₂ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 ∨
p = 0 ∧ q = ∞ ∨
p = 0 ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∨
p = ∞ ∧ q = ∞ ∨
0 < p.toReal ∧ q = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∧ p.toReal ≤ q.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (bot_le : 0 ≤ p) with ((rfl : 0 = p) | (hp : 0 < p))
· simpa using q.trichotomy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_top : q ≤ ∞) with (rfl | hq)
· simpa using p.trichotomy
repeat' right
have hq' : 0 < q := lt_of_lt_of_le hp hpq
have hp' : p < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt hpq hq
simp [ENNReal.toReal_mono hq.ne hpq, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff, hp, hp', hq', hq]
protected theorem dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal :=
haveI : p = ⊤ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
simpa using ENNReal.trichotomy₂ (Fact.out : 1 ≤ p)
this.imp_right fun h => h.2
theorem toReal_pos_iff_ne_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : 0 < p.toReal ↔ p ≠ ∞ :=
⟨fun h hp =>
have : (0 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := toReal_top ▸ (hp ▸ h.ne : 0 ≠ ∞.toReal)
this rfl,
fun h => zero_lt_one.trans_le (p.dichotomy.resolve_left h)⟩
end Real
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, toNNReal_top, NNReal.iInf_empty]
· lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [← coe_iInf, toNNReal_coe]
theorem toNNReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toNNReal = sInf (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sInf_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iInf hf)
theorem toNNReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toNNReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [toNNReal_coe]
by_cases h : BddAbove (range f)
· rw [← coe_iSup h, toNNReal_coe]
· rw [NNReal.iSup_of_not_bddAbove h, iSup_coe_eq_top.2 h, toNNReal_top]
theorem toNNReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toNNReal = sSup (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sSup_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iSup hf)
theorem toReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iInf hf, NNReal.coe_iInf]
theorem toReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toReal = sInf (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sInf s hf, NNReal.coe_sInf, Set.image_image]
theorem toReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iSup hf, NNReal.coe_iSup]
theorem toReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toReal = sSup (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sSup s hf, NNReal.coe_sSup, Set.image_image]
@[simp] lemma ofReal_iInf [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ | h := em (∃ i, f i ≤ 0)
· rw [(iInf_eq_bot _).2 fun _ _ ↦ ⟨i, by simpa [ofReal_of_nonpos hi]⟩]
simp [Real.iInf_nonpos' ⟨i, hi⟩]
replace h i : 0 ≤ f i := le_of_not_le fun hi ↦ h ⟨i, hi⟩
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a ↦ ?_
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ∞
· simp
rw [le_iInf_iff, le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha, le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds]⟩]
· exact forall_congr' fun i ↦ (le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha (h _)).symm
· exact Real.iInf_nonneg h
theorem iInf_add : iInf f + a = ⨅ i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => add_le_add (iInf_le _ _) <| le_rfl)
(tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iInf fun _ => tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iInf_le _ _)
theorem iSup_sub : (⨆ i, f i) - a = ⨆ i, f i - a :=
le_antisymm (tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iSup_le fun i => tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iSup (f · - a) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (le_iSup _ _) (le_refl a))
theorem sub_iInf : (a - ⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a - f i := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm, iInf_add]
simp [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
theorem sInf_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} : sInf s + a = ⨅ b ∈ s, b + a := by simp [sInf_eq_iInf, iInf_add]
| theorem add_iInf {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a + iInf f = ⨅ b, a + f b := by
rw [add_comm, iInf_add]; simp [add_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 442 | 444 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
/-!
# Freiman homomorphisms
In this file, we define Freiman homomorphisms and isomorphism.
An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` such that `f '' A ⊆ B` and
`f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ` for all `x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A` such that
`x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ`. In particular, any `MulHom` is a Freiman homomorphism.
Note a `0`- or `1`-Freiman homomorphism is simply a map, thus a `2`-Freiman homomorphism is the
first interesting case (and the most common). As `n` increases further, the property of being
an `n`-Freiman homomorphism between abelian groups becomes increasingly stronger.
An `n`-Freiman isomorphism from `A` to `B` is a function `f : α → β` bijective between `A` and `B`
such that `f x₁ * ... * f xₙ = f y₁ * ... * f yₙ ↔ x₁ * ... * xₙ = y₁ * ... * yₙ` for all
`x₁, ..., xₙ, y₁, ..., yₙ ∈ A`. In particular, any `MulEquiv` is a Freiman isomorphism.
They are of interest in additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `IsMulFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanHom`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman homomorphism.
* `IsMulFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be a multiplicative Freiman isomorphism.
* `IsAddFreimanIso`: Predicate for a function to be an additive Freiman isomorphism.
## Main results
* `isMulFreimanHom_two`: Characterisation of `2`-Freiman homomorphisms.
* `IsMulFreimanHom.mono`: If `m ≤ n` and `f` is an `n`-Freiman homomorphism, then it is also an
`m`-Freiman homomorphism.
## Implementation notes
In the context of combinatorics, we are interested in Freiman homomorphisms over sets which are not
necessarily closed under addition/multiplication. This means we must parametrize them with a set in
an `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` instead of the `AddMonoid`/`Monoid` itself.
## References
[Yufei Zhao, *18.225: Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics*](https://yufeizhao.com/gtac/)
## TODO
* `MonoidHomClass.isMulFreimanHom` could be relaxed to `MulHom.toFreimanHom` by proving
`(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod` directly by induction instead of going through `f s.prod`.
* Affine maps are Freiman homs.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
open Multiset Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {A A₁ A₂ : Set α}
{B B₁ B₂ : Set β} {C : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {n : ℕ}
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves sums
of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanHom [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.sum = t.sum) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanHom (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
mapsTo : MapsTo f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) (h : s.prod = t.prod) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a bijective map which
preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
structure IsAddFreimanIso [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β)
(f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An additive `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves sums of `n` elements. -/
map_sum_eq_map_sum ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).sum = (t.map f).sum ↔ s.sum = t.sum
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism from a set `A` to a set `B` is a map which preserves products of `n`
elements. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulFreimanIso (n : ℕ) (A : Set α) (B : Set β) (f : α → β) : Prop where
bijOn : BijOn f A B
/-- An `n`-Freiman homomorphism preserves products of `n` elements. -/
map_prod_eq_map_prod ⦃s t : Multiset α⦄ (hsA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ A) (htA : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t → x ∈ A)
(hs : Multiset.card s = n) (ht : Multiset.card t = n) :
(s.map f).prod = (t.map f).prod ↔ s.prod = t.prod
@[to_additive]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.isMulFreimanHom (hf : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f) : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f where
mapsTo := hf.bijOn.mapsTo
map_prod_eq_map_prod _s _t hsA htA hs ht := (hf.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht).2
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanHom n A B f₂ where
mapsTo := hf₁.mapsTo.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht h' := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (hsA hx)).symm, map_congr rfl fun x hx => (h (htA hx)).symm,
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht h']
|
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.congr (hf₁ : IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₁) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ A) :
IsMulFreimanIso n A B f₂ where
bijOn := hf₁.bijOn.congr h
map_prod_eq_map_prod s t hsA htA hs ht := by
rw [map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (hsA hx), map_congr rfl fun x hx => h.symm (htA hx),
hf₁.map_prod_eq_map_prod hsA htA hs ht]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/FreimanHom.lean | 125 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
theorem setToL1_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← (setToL1 hT).map_sub]
exact setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
theorem norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) * ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by
refine
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_extend_le (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) (coeToLp α E ℝ)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) fun x => le_of_eq ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
simp [coeToLp]
_ = ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le hT hC) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hC
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le' hT) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem norm_setToL1_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC)
theorem norm_setToL1_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT)
theorem setToL1_lipschitz (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) (setToL1 hT) :=
(setToL1 hT).lipschitz.weaken (norm_setToL1_le' hT)
/-- If `fs i → f` in `L1`, then `setToL1 hT (fs i) → setToL1 hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) {ι}
(fs : ι → α →₁[μ] E) {l : Filter ι} (hfs : Tendsto fs l (𝓝 f)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToL1 hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToL1 hT f) :=
((setToL1 hT).continuous.tendsto _).comp hfs
end SetToL1
end L1
section Function
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ} {f g : α → E}
variable (μ T)
open Classical in
/-- Extend `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α → E) → F` (for integrable functions `α → E`). We set it to
0 if the function is not integrable. -/
def setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) else 0
variable {μ T}
theorem setToFun_eq (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) :=
dif_pos hf
theorem L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (L1.integrable_coeFn f), Integrable.toL1_coeFn]
theorem setToFun_undef (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
theorem setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_undef hT (not_and_of_not_left _ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias setToFun_non_aEStronglyMeasurable := setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem setToFun_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left' T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (T + T') (hT.add hT') f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left hT hT']
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T'' hT'' f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (fun s => c • T s) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left hT c]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T' hT' f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left' hT hT' c h_smul]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
rw [Pi.zero_def, setToFun_eq hT (integrable_zero _ _ _)]
simp only [← Pi.zero_def]
rw [Integrable.toL1_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero_left {hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C} :
setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left hT _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left' hT h_zero _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (hf.add hg), setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hg, Integrable.toL1_add,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_add]
theorem setToFun_finset_sum' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
classical
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro _
simp only [setToFun_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
rw [setToFun_add hT (hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)) _]
· rw [ih fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
· convert integrable_finset_sum s fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) with x
simp
theorem setToFun_finset_sum (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
convert setToFun_finset_sum' hT s hf with a; simp
theorem setToFun_neg (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT (-f) = -setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hf.neg, Integrable.toL1_neg,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_neg]
· rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT, neg_zero]
rwa [← integrable_neg_iff] at hf
theorem setToFun_sub (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, setToFun_add hT hf hg.neg, setToFun_neg hT g]
theorem setToFun_smul [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT, Integrable.toL1_smul',
L1.setToL1_smul hT h_smul c _]
· by_cases hr : c = 0
· rw [hr]; simp
· have hf' : ¬Integrable (c • f) μ := by rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT hf', smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_congr_ae (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· have hgi : Integrable g μ := hfi.congr h
rw [setToFun_eq hT hfi, setToFun_eq hT hgi, (Integrable.toL1_eq_toL1_iff f g hfi hgi).2 h]
· have hgi : ¬Integrable g μ := by rw [integrable_congr h] at hfi; exact hfi
rw [setToFun_undef hT hfi, setToFun_undef hT hgi]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : μ = 0) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by simp [h, EventuallyEq]
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT this, setToFun_zero]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → μ s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_zero_left' hT fun s hs hμs => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero hs (h s hs hμs)
theorem setToFun_toL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (hf.toL1 f) = setToFun μ T hT f :=
setToFun_congr_ae hT hf.coeFn_toL1
theorem setToFun_indicator_const (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToFun μ T hT (s.indicator fun _ => x) = T s x := by
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ hs hμs x).symm]
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]
exact L1.setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT hs hμs x
theorem setToFun_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun _ => x) = T univ x := by
have : (fun _ : α => x) = Set.indicator univ fun _ => x := (indicator_univ _).symm
rw [this]
exact setToFun_indicator_const hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToFun_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf]; exact L1.setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' hTT' _
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f :=
setToFun_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToFun_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α → G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hfi]
refine L1.setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg ?_
rw [← Lp.coeFn_le]
have h0 := Lp.coeFn_zero G' 1 μ
have h := Integrable.coeFn_toL1 hfi
filter_upwards [h0, h, hf] with _ h0a ha hfa
rw [h0a, ha]
exact hfa
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hfi, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α → G'}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← setToFun_sub hT hg hf]
refine setToFun_nonneg hT hT_nonneg (hfg.mono fun a ha => ?_)
rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ha
end Order
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ T hT f := by
simp_rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]; exact ContinuousLinearMap.continuous _
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `setToFun μ T hT (F i) → setToFun μ T hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (f : α → E)
(hfi : Integrable f μ) {fs : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} (hfsi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (fs i) μ)
(hfs : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖fs i x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
classical
let f_lp := hfi.toL1 f
let F_lp i := if hFi : Integrable (fs i) μ then hFi.toL1 (fs i) else 0
have tendsto_L1 : Tendsto F_lp l (𝓝 f_lp) := by
rw [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm']
simp_rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp hfs
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hi.coeFn_toL1, hfi.coeFn_toL1] with x hxi hxf
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi, hxi, f_lp, hxf]
suffices Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (F_lp i)) l (𝓝 (setToFun μ T hT f)) by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp this
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
suffices h_ae_eq : F_lp i =ᵐ[μ] fs i from setToFun_congr_ae hT h_ae_eq
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi]
exact hi.coeFn_toL1
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT hfi.coeFn_toL1.symm]
exact ((continuous_setToFun hT).tendsto f_lp).comp tendsto_L1
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E} {s : Set E} [SeparableSpace s]
(hfi : Integrable f μ) (hfm : Measurable f) (hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E}
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) (h₀i : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f hfm s y₀ h₀ n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) :=
tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 hT _ hfi
(Eventually.of_forall (SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn hfm hfi h₀ h₀i))
(SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm hfm _ hs (hfi.sub h₀i).2)
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) (s : Set E) [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas s 0 (hs <| by simp) n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
refine tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable hT hf fmeas ?_ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _)
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => subset_closure (hs (Set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `setToFun_congr_measure`: the function sending `f : α →₁[μ] G` to
`f : α →₁[μ'] G` is continuous when `μ' ≤ c' • μ` for `c' ≠ ∞`. -/
theorem continuous_L1_toL1 {μ' : Measure α} (c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f := by
by_cases hc'0 : c' = 0
· have hμ'0 : μ' = 0 := by rw [← Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero']; refine hμ'_le.trans ?_; simp [hc'0]
have h_im_zero :
(fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f) =
0 := by
ext1 f; ext1; simp_rw [hμ'0]; simp only [ae_zero, EventuallyEq, eventually_bot]
rw [h_im_zero]
exact continuous_zero
rw [Metric.continuous_iff]
intro f ε hε_pos
use ε / 2 / c'.toReal
refine ⟨div_pos (half_pos hε_pos) (toReal_pos hc'0 hc'), ?_⟩
intro g hfg
rw [Lp.dist_def] at hfg ⊢
let h_int := fun f' : α →₁[μ] G => (L1.integrable_coeFn f').of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le
have :
eLpNorm (⇑(Integrable.toL1 g (h_int g)) - ⇑(Integrable.toL1 f (h_int f))) 1 μ' =
eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ' :=
eLpNorm_congr_ae ((Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _).sub (Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _))
rw [this]
have h_eLpNorm_ne_top : eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ ≠ ∞ := by
rw [← eLpNorm_congr_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _)]; exact Lp.eLpNorm_ne_top _
calc
(eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ').toReal ≤ (c' * eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ).toReal := by
refine toReal_mono (ENNReal.mul_ne_top hc' h_eLpNorm_ne_top) ?_
refine (eLpNorm_mono_measure (⇑g - ⇑f) hμ'_le).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero hc'0, smul_eq_mul]
simp
_ = c'.toReal * (eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ).toReal := toReal_mul
_ ≤ c'.toReal * (ε / 2 / c'.toReal) := by gcongr
_ = ε / 2 := by
refine mul_div_cancel₀ (ε / 2) ?_; rw [Ne, toReal_eq_zero_iff]; simp [hc', hc'0]
_ < ε := half_lt_self hε_pos
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable {μ' : Measure α} (c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞)
(hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (f : α → E) (hfμ : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f := by
-- integrability for `μ` implies integrability for `μ'`.
have h_int : ∀ g : α → E, Integrable g μ → Integrable g μ' := fun g hg =>
Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le hg
-- We use `Integrable.induction`
apply hfμ.induction (P := fun f => setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f)
· intro c s hs hμs
have hμ's : μ' s ≠ ∞ := by
refine ((hμ'_le s).trans_lt ?_).ne
rw [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc'.lt_top hμs
rw [setToFun_indicator_const hT hs hμs.ne, setToFun_indicator_const hT' hs hμ's]
· intro f₂ g₂ _ hf₂ hg₂ h_eq_f h_eq_g
rw [setToFun_add hT hf₂ hg₂, setToFun_add hT' (h_int f₂ hf₂) (h_int g₂ hg₂), h_eq_f, h_eq_g]
· refine isClosed_eq (continuous_setToFun hT) ?_
have :
(fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ' T hT' f) = fun f : α →₁[μ] E =>
setToFun μ' T hT' ((h_int f (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f) := by
ext1 f; exact setToFun_congr_ae hT' (Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _).symm
rw [this]
exact (continuous_setToFun hT').comp (continuous_L1_toL1 c' hc' hμ'_le)
· intro f₂ g₂ hfg _ hf_eq
have hfg' : f₂ =ᵐ[μ'] g₂ := (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul hμ'_le).ae_eq hfg
rw [← setToFun_congr_ae hT hfg, hf_eq, setToFun_congr_ae hT' hfg']
theorem setToFun_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (c c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞)
(hμ_le : μ ≤ c • μ') (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· exact setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable c' hc' hμ'_le hT hT' f hf
· -- if `f` is not integrable, both `setToFun` are 0.
have h_int : ∀ g : α → E, ¬Integrable g μ → ¬Integrable g μ' := fun g =>
mt fun h => h.of_measure_le_smul hc hμ_le
simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, setToFun_undef _ (h_int f hf)]
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_right {μ' : Measure α}
(hT_add : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + μ') T C') (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + μ')) :
setToFun (μ + μ') T hT_add f = setToFun μ T hT f := by
refine setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable 1 one_ne_top ?_ hT_add hT f hf
rw [one_smul]
nth_rw 1 [← add_zero μ]
exact add_le_add le_rfl bot_le
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_left {μ' : Measure α}
(hT_add : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + μ') T C') (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C)
(f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + μ')) :
setToFun (μ + μ') T hT_add f = setToFun μ' T hT f := by
refine setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable 1 one_ne_top ?_ hT_add hT f hf
rw [one_smul]
nth_rw 1 [← zero_add μ']
exact add_le_add_right bot_le μ'
theorem setToFun_top_smul_measure (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (∞ • μ) T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun (∞ • μ) T hT f = 0 := by
refine setToFun_measure_zero' hT fun s _ hμs => ?_
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hμs
simp only [true_and, Measure.smul_apply, ENNReal.mul_eq_top, eq_self_iff_true,
top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff, not_or, Classical.not_not, smul_eq_mul] at hμs
simp only [hμs.right, Measure.smul_apply, mul_zero, smul_eq_mul]
theorem setToFun_congr_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT_smul : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T C')
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun (c • μ) T hT_smul f := by
by_cases hc0 : c = 0
· simp [hc0] at hT_smul
have h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0 := fun s hs _ => hT_smul.eq_zero hs
rw [setToFun_zero_left' _ h, setToFun_measure_zero]
simp [hc0]
refine setToFun_congr_measure c⁻¹ c ?_ hc_ne_top (le_of_eq ?_) le_rfl hT hT_smul f
· simp [hc0]
· rw [smul_smul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hc0 hc_ne_top, one_smul]
theorem norm_setToFun_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC f
theorem norm_setToFun_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ := by
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT f
theorem norm_setToFun_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖hf.toL1 f‖ := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC _
theorem norm_setToFun_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖hf.toL1 f‖ := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT _
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem provides sufficient conditions under which almost
everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies the convergence of their image by
`setToFun`.
We could weaken the condition `bound_integrable` to require `HasFiniteIntegral bound μ` instead
(i.e. not requiring that `bound` is measurable), but in all applications proving integrability
is easier. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
{fs : ℕ → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(fs_measurable : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => fs n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (fs n)) atTop (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
-- `f` is a.e.-measurable, since it is the a.e.-pointwise limit of a.e.-measurable functions.
have f_measurable : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
aestronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto_ae _ fs_measurable h_lim
-- all functions we consider are integrable
have fs_int : ∀ n, Integrable (fs n) μ := fun n =>
bound_integrable.mono' (fs_measurable n) (h_bound _)
have f_int : Integrable f μ :=
⟨f_measurable,
hasFiniteIntegral_of_dominated_convergence bound_integrable.hasFiniteIntegral h_bound
h_lim⟩
-- it suffices to prove the result for the corresponding L1 functions
suffices
Tendsto (fun n => L1.setToL1 hT ((fs_int n).toL1 (fs n))) atTop
(𝓝 (L1.setToL1 hT (f_int.toL1 f))) by
convert this with n
· exact setToFun_eq hT (fs_int n)
· exact setToFun_eq hT f_int
-- the convergence of setToL1 follows from the convergence of the L1 functions
refine L1.tendsto_setToL1 hT _ _ ?_
-- up to some rewriting, what we need to prove is `h_lim`
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
have lintegral_norm_tendsto_zero :
Tendsto (fun n => ENNReal.toReal <| ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖fs n a - f a‖ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_toReal zero_ne_top).comp
(tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence fs_measurable
bound_integrable.hasFiniteIntegral h_bound h_lim)
convert lintegral_norm_tendsto_zero with n
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
rw [← Integrable.toL1_sub]
refine ((fs_int n).sub f_int).coeFn_toL1.mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hx, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι}
{l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {fs : ι → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => fs n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (fs n)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl : ∀ s ∈ l, ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, x b ∈ s := by rwa [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
have h :
{ x : ι | (fun n => AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ) x } ∩
{ x : ι | (fun n => ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a) x } ∈ l :=
inter_mem hfs_meas h_bound
obtain ⟨k, h⟩ := hxl _ h
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ?_ bound_integrable ?_ ?_
· exact fun n => (h _ (self_le_add_left _ _)).1
· exact fun n => (h _ (self_le_add_left _ _)).2
· filter_upwards [h_lim]
refine fun a h_lin => @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) (fun n => fs n a) _ _ _ h_lin ?_
rwa [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
{fs : X → α → E} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => fs x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) s x₀ :=
tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ‹_› ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
theorem continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} (hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => fs x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) x₀ :=
tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ‹_› ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
theorem continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X} (hfs_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => fs x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) s := by
intro x hx
refine continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated hT ?_ ?_ bound_integrable ?_
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx using hfs_meas x hx
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx using h_bound x hx
· filter_upwards [h_cont] with a ha using ha x hx
theorem continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{bound : α → ℝ} (hfs_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => fs x a) : Continuous fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun _ =>
continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated hT (Eventually.of_forall hfs_meas)
(Eventually.of_forall h_bound) ‹_› <|
h_cont.mono fun _ => Continuous.continuousAt
end Function
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 1,496 | 1,498 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Subfield.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleRing.Basic
/-!
# Fraction ring / fraction field Frac(R) as localization
## Main definitions
* `IsFractionRing R K` expresses that `K` is a field of fractions of `R`, as an abbreviation of
`IsLocalization (NonZeroDivisors R) K`
## Main results
* `IsFractionRing.field`: a definition (not an instance) stating the localization of an integral
domain `R` at `R \ {0}` is a field
* `Rat.isFractionRing` is an instance stating `ℚ` is the field of fractions of `ℤ`
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] (K : Type*)
-- TODO: should this extend `Algebra` instead of assuming it?
/-- `IsFractionRing R K` states `K` is the ring of fractions of a commutative ring `R`. -/
abbrev IsFractionRing [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] :=
IsLocalization (nonZeroDivisors R) K
instance {R : Type*} [Field R] : IsFractionRing R R :=
IsLocalization.at_units _ (fun _ ↦ isUnit_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors)
/-- The cast from `Int` to `Rat` as a `FractionRing`. -/
instance Rat.isFractionRing : IsFractionRing ℤ ℚ where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero] at hx
simpa only [eq_intCast, isUnit_iff_ne_zero, Int.cast_eq_zero, Ne, Subtype.coe_mk] using hx
surj' := by
rintro ⟨n, d, hd, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, ⟨d, ?_⟩⟩, Rat.mul_den_eq_num _⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos]
exact Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hd
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [eq_intCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_inj]
rintro rfl
use 1
namespace IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
theorem of_field [Field K] [Algebra R K] [FaithfulSMul R K]
(surj : ∀ z : K, ∃ x y, z = algebraMap R K x / algebraMap R K y) :
IsFractionRing R K :=
have inj := FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R K
have := inj.noZeroDivisors _ (map_zero _) (map_mul _)
have := Module.nontrivial R K
{ map_units' x :=
.mk0 _ <| (map_ne_zero_iff _ inj).mpr <| mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp x.2
surj' z := by
have ⟨x, y, eq⟩ := surj z
obtain rfl | hy := eq_or_ne y 0
· obtain rfl : z = 0 := by simpa using eq
exact ⟨(0, 1), by simp⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, y, mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hy⟩,
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq <| (map_ne_zero_iff _ inj).mpr hy).mp eq⟩
exists_of_eq eq := ⟨1, by simpa using inj eq⟩ }
variable {R K}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
theorem to_map_eq_zero_iff {x : R} : algebraMap R K x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_eq_zero_iff _ le_rfl
variable (R K)
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap R K) :=
IsLocalization.injective _ (le_of_eq rfl)
instance (priority := 100) : FaithfulSMul R K :=
(faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective R K).mpr <| IsFractionRing.injective R K
variable {R K}
@[norm_cast, simp]
-- Porting note: using `↑` didn't work, so I needed to explicitly put in the cast myself
theorem coe_inj {a b : R} : (Algebra.cast a : K) = Algebra.cast b ↔ a = b :=
(IsFractionRing.injective R K).eq_iff
protected theorem to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors [Nontrivial R] {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) : algebraMap R K x ≠ 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ le_rfl hx
variable (A) [IsDomain A]
include A in
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is an
integral domain. -/
protected theorem isDomain : IsDomain K :=
isDomain_of_le_nonZeroDivisors _ (le_refl (nonZeroDivisors A))
/-- The inverse of an element in the field of fractions of an integral domain. -/
protected noncomputable irreducible_def inv (z : K) : K := open scoped Classical in
if h : z = 0 then 0
else
mk' K ↑(sec (nonZeroDivisors A) z).2
⟨(sec _ z).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
h <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) z) h0⟩
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (x : K) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x * IsFractionRing.inv A x = 1 := by
rw [IsFractionRing.inv, dif_neg hx, ←
IsUnit.mul_left_inj
(map_units K
⟨(sec _ x).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
hx <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) x) h0⟩),
one_mul, mul_assoc]
rw [mk'_spec, ← eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq]
exact (mk'_sec _ x).symm
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is a field.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[stacks 09FJ]
noncomputable abbrev toField : Field K where
__ := IsFractionRing.isDomain A
inv := IsFractionRing.inv A
mul_inv_cancel := IsFractionRing.mul_inv_cancel A
inv_zero := show IsFractionRing.inv A (0 : K) = 0 by rw [IsFractionRing.inv]; exact dif_pos rfl
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
lemma surjective_iff_isField [IsDomain R] : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R K) ↔ IsField R where
mp h := (RingEquiv.ofBijective (algebraMap R K)
⟨IsFractionRing.injective R K, h⟩).toMulEquiv.isField _ (IsFractionRing.toField R).toIsField
mpr h :=
letI := h.toField
(IsLocalization.atUnits R _ (S := K)
(fun _ hx ↦ Ne.isUnit (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hx))).surjective
end CommRing
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDomain B] [Field K] {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra A K]
[IsFractionRing A K] {g : A →+* L}
theorem mk'_mk_eq_div {r s} (hs : s ∈ nonZeroDivisors A) :
mk' K r ⟨s, hs⟩ = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
haveI := (algebraMap A K).domain_nontrivial
mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <|
(div_mul_cancel₀ (algebraMap A K r)
(IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hs)).symm
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_div {r} (s : nonZeroDivisors A) : mk' K r s = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
mk'_mk_eq_div s.2
theorem div_surjective (z : K) :
∃ x y : A, y ∈ nonZeroDivisors A ∧ algebraMap _ _ x / algebraMap _ _ y = z :=
let ⟨x, ⟨y, hy⟩, h⟩ := mk'_surjective (nonZeroDivisors A) z
⟨x, y, hy, by rwa [mk'_eq_div] at h⟩
theorem isUnit_map_of_injective (hg : Function.Injective g) (y : nonZeroDivisors A) :
IsUnit (g y) :=
haveI := g.domain_nontrivial
IsUnit.mk0 (g y) <|
show g.toMonoidWithZeroHom y ≠ 0 from map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors g hg y.2
theorem mk'_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] {x : R} {y : nonZeroDivisors R} :
mk' K x y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
haveI := (algebraMap R K).domain_nontrivial
simp [nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero]
theorem mk'_eq_one_iff_eq {x : A} {y : nonZeroDivisors A} : mk' K x y = 1 ↔ x = y := by
haveI := (algebraMap A K).domain_nontrivial
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => by rw [hxy, mk'_self']⟩
intro hxy
have hy : (algebraMap A K) ↑y ≠ (0 : K) :=
IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors y.property
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_one_iff_eq hy] at hxy
exact IsFractionRing.injective A K hxy
section Subfield
variable (A K) in
/-- If `A` is a commutative ring with fraction field `K`, then the subfield of `K` generated by
the image of `algebraMap A K` is equal to the whole field `K`. -/
theorem closure_range_algebraMap : Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap A K)) = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun z _ ↦ by
obtain ⟨_, _, -, rfl⟩ := div_surjective (A := A) z
apply div_mem <;> exact Subfield.subset_closure ⟨_, rfl⟩
variable {L : Type*} [Field L] {g : A →+* L} {f : K →+* L}
/-- If `A` is a commutative ring with fraction field `K`, `L` is a field, `g : A →+* L` lifts to
`f : K →+* L`, then the image of `f` is the subfield generated by the image of `g`. -/
theorem ringHom_fieldRange_eq_of_comp_eq (h : RingHom.comp f (algebraMap A K) = g) :
f.fieldRange = Subfield.closure g.range := by
rw [f.fieldRange_eq_map, ← closure_range_algebraMap A K,
f.map_field_closure, ← Set.range_comp, ← f.coe_comp, h, g.coe_range]
/-- If `A` is a commutative ring with fraction field `K`, `L` is a field, `g : A →+* L` lifts to
`f : K →+* L`, `s` is a set such that the image of `g` is the subring generated by `s`,
then the image of `f` is the subfield generated by `s`. -/
theorem ringHom_fieldRange_eq_of_comp_eq_of_range_eq (h : RingHom.comp f (algebraMap A K) = g)
{s : Set L} (hs : g.range = Subring.closure s) : f.fieldRange = Subfield.closure s := by
rw [ringHom_fieldRange_eq_of_comp_eq h, hs]
ext
simp_rw [Subfield.mem_closure_iff, Subring.closure_eq]
end Subfield
open Function
/-- Given a commutative ring `A` with field of fractions `K`,
and an injective ring hom `g : A →+* L` where `L` is a field, we get a
field hom sending `z : K` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : A × (NonZeroDivisors A)` are
such that `z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
noncomputable def lift (hg : Injective g) : K →+* L :=
IsLocalization.lift fun y : nonZeroDivisors A => isUnit_map_of_injective hg y
theorem lift_unique (hg : Function.Injective g) {f : K →+* L}
(hf1 : ∀ x, f (algebraMap A K x) = g x) : IsFractionRing.lift hg = f :=
IsLocalization.lift_unique _ hf1
/-- Another version of unique to give two lift maps should be equal -/
theorem ringHom_ext {f1 f2 : K →+* L}
(hf : ∀ x : A, f1 (algebraMap A K x) = f2 (algebraMap A K x)) : f1 = f2 := by
ext z
obtain ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩ := IsFractionRing.div_surjective (A := A) z
rw [map_div₀, map_div₀, hf, hf]
theorem injective_comp_algebraMap :
Function.Injective fun (f : K →+* L) => f.comp (algebraMap A K) :=
fun _ _ h => ringHom_ext (fun x => RingHom.congr_fun h x)
section liftAlgHom
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R K] [IsScalarTower R A K] [Algebra R L]
{g : A →ₐ[R] L} (hg : Injective g) (x : K)
include hg
/-- `AlgHom` version of `IsFractionRing.lift`. -/
noncomputable def liftAlgHom : K →ₐ[R] L :=
IsLocalization.liftAlgHom fun y : nonZeroDivisors A => isUnit_map_of_injective hg y
| theorem liftAlgHom_toRingHom : (liftAlgHom hg : K →ₐ[R] L).toRingHom = lift hg := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftAlgHom : ⇑(liftAlgHom hg : K →ₐ[R] L) = lift hg := rfl
theorem liftAlgHom_apply : liftAlgHom hg x = lift hg x := rfl
end liftAlgHom
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/FractionRing.lean | 268 | 275 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
/-!
# Properties of cyclic permutations constructed from lists/cycles
In the following, `{α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]`.
## Main definitions
* `Cycle.formPerm`: the cyclic permutation created by looping over a `Cycle α`
* `Equiv.Perm.toList`: the list formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`: the cycle formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`: the equivalence between cyclic permutations `f : Perm α`
and the terms of `Cycle α` that correspond to them
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'`: the same equivalence as `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`
but with evaluation via choosing over fintypes
* The notation `c[1, 2, 3]` to emulate notation of cyclic permutations `(1 2 3)`
* A `Repr` instance for any `Perm α`, by representing the `Finset` of
`Cycle α` that correspond to the cycle factors.
## Main results
* `List.isCycle_formPerm`: a nontrivial list without duplicates, when interpreted as
a permutation, is cyclic
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle`: there is only one nontrivial `Cycle α`
corresponding to each cyclic `f : Perm α`
## Implementation details
The forward direction of `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'` uses `Fintype.choose` of the uniqueness
result, relying on the `Fintype` instance of a `Cycle.Nodup` subtype.
It is unclear if this works faster than the `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`, which relies
on recursion over `Finset.univ`.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ mem_cons_self]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem this
use k
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk]
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
theorem cycleType_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
cycleType l.attach.formPerm = {l.length} := by
rw [← length_attach] at hn
rw [← nodup_attach] at hl
rw [cycleType_eq [l.attach.formPerm]]
· simp only [map, Function.comp_apply]
rw [support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hl, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hl]
· simp
· intro x h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hn
· simp
· simpa using isCycle_formPerm hl hn
· simp
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (hl : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
formPerm l x = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [next_getElem _ hl, formPerm_apply_getElem _ hl]
end List
namespace Cycle
variable [DecidableEq α] (s : Cycle α)
/-- A cycle `s : Cycle α`, given `Nodup s` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α`
where each element in the list is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`.
-/
def formPerm : ∀ s : Cycle α, Nodup s → Equiv.Perm α :=
fun s => Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => List.formPerm l) fun l₁ l₂ (h : l₁ ~r l₂) => by
apply Function.hfunext
· ext
exact h.nodup_iff
· intro h₁ h₂ _
exact heq_of_eq (formPerm_eq_of_isRotated h₁ h)
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_coe (l : List α) (hl : l.Nodup) : formPerm (l : Cycle α) hl = l.formPerm :=
rfl
theorem formPerm_subsingleton (s : Cycle α) (h : Subsingleton s) : formPerm s h.nodup = 1 := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
simp only [formPerm_coe, mk_eq_coe]
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe] at h
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := s
· simp
· simp only [length_eq_zero_iff, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, List.length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h
simp [h]
theorem isCycle_formPerm (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
IsCycle (formPerm s h) := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.isCycle_formPerm h (length_nontrivial hn)
theorem support_formPerm [Fintype α] (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
support (formPerm s h) = s.toFinset := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup s h ?_
rintro _ rfl
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using length_nontrivial hn
theorem formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
formPerm s h x = x := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ hx
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
formPerm s h x = next s h x hx := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next h _ (by simp_all)
nonrec theorem formPerm_reverse (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) :
formPerm s.reverse (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr h) = (formPerm s h)⁻¹ := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using formPerm_reverse _
nonrec theorem formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s s' : Cycle α} {hs : s.Nodup}
{hs' : s'.Nodup} :
s.formPerm hs = s'.formPerm hs' ↔ s = s' ∨ s.Subsingleton ∧ s'.Subsingleton := by
rw [Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff, Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff]
revert s s'
intro s s'
apply @Quotient.inductionOn₂' _ _ _ _ _ s s'
intro l l' hl hl'
simpa using formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff hl hl'
end Cycle
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
/-- `Equiv.Perm.toList (f : Perm α) (x : α)` generates the list `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]`
until looping. That means when `f x = x`, `toList f x = []`.
-/
def toList : List α :=
List.iterate p x (cycleOf p x).support.card
@[simp]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil_iff {p : Perm α} {x} : toList p x = [] ↔ x ∉ p.support := by simp [toList]
@[simp]
theorem length_toList : length (toList p x) = (cycleOf p x).support.card := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_ne_singleton (y : α) : toList p x ≠ [y] := by
intro H
simpa [card_support_ne_one] using congr_arg length H
theorem two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support {p : Perm α} {x : α} :
2 ≤ length (toList p x) ↔ x ∈ p.support := by simp
theorem length_toList_pos_of_mem_support (h : x ∈ p.support) : 0 < length (toList p x) :=
zero_lt_two.trans_le (two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support.mpr h)
theorem getElem_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x)[n] = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated getElem_toList (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem get_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_getElem_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x)[0]'(length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h) = x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated toList_getElem_zero (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem toList_get_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).get ⟨0, (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h)⟩ = x := by simp [toList]
variable {p} {x}
theorem mem_toList_iff {y : α} : y ∈ toList p x ↔ SameCycle p x y ∧ x ∈ p.support := by
simp only [toList, mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hx, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx
rw [← support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨h, hx⟩
simpa using h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
theorem nodup_toList (p : Perm α) (x : α) : Nodup (toList p x) := by
by_cases hx : p x = x
· rw [← not_mem_support, ← toList_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
have hc : IsCycle (cycleOf p x) := isCycle_cycleOf p hx
rw [nodup_iff_injective_getElem]
intro ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
rw [length_toList, ← hc.orderOf] at hm hn
rw [← cycleOf_apply_self, ← Ne, ← mem_support] at hx
simp only [Fin.mk.injEq]
rw [getElem_toList, getElem_toList, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x n, ←
cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x m]
rcases n with - | n <;> rcases m with - | m
· simp
· rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf m.zero_lt_succ hm, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
simp [hx.symm]
| · rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf n.zero_lt_succ hn, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 259 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SumOverResidueClass
/-!
# Convergence of `p`-series
In this file we prove that the series `∑' k in ℕ, 1 / k ^ p` converges if and only if `p > 1`.
The proof is based on the
[Cauchy condensation test](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_condensation_test): `∑ k, f k`
converges if and only if so does `∑ k, 2 ^ k f (2 ^ k)`. We prove this test in
`NNReal.summable_condensed_iff` and `summable_condensed_iff_of_nonneg`, then use it to prove
`summable_one_div_rpow`. After this transformation, a `p`-series turns into a geometric series.
## Tags
p-series, Cauchy condensation test
-/
/-!
### Schlömilch's generalization of the Cauchy condensation test
In this section we prove the Schlömilch's generalization of the Cauchy condensation test:
for a strictly increasing `u : ℕ → ℕ` with ratio of successive differences bounded and an
antitone `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0` or `f : ℕ → ℝ`, `∑ k, f k` converges if and only if
so does `∑ k, (u (k + 1) - u k) * f (u k)`. Instead of giving a monolithic proof, we split it
into a series of lemmas with explicit estimates of partial sums of each series in terms of the
partial sums of the other series.
-/
/--
A sequence `u` has the property that its ratio of successive differences is bounded
when there is a positive real number `C` such that, for all n ∈ ℕ,
(u (n + 2) - u (n + 1)) ≤ C * (u (n + 1) - u n)
-/
def SuccDiffBounded (C : ℕ) (u : ℕ → ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ n : ℕ, u (n + 2) - u (n + 1) ≤ C • (u (n + 1) - u n)
namespace Finset
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedAddMonoid M]
{f : ℕ → M} {u : ℕ → ℕ}
theorem le_sum_schlomilch' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (h_pos : ∀ n, 0 < u n)
(hu : Monotone u) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ Ico (u 0) (u n), f k) ≤ ∑ k ∈ range n, (u (k + 1) - u k) • f (u k) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ihn =>
suffices (∑ k ∈ Ico (u n) (u (n + 1)), f k) ≤ (u (n + 1) - u n) • f (u n) by
rw [sum_range_succ, ← sum_Ico_consecutive]
· exact add_le_add ihn this
exacts [hu n.zero_le, hu n.le_succ]
have : ∀ k ∈ Ico (u n) (u (n + 1)), f k ≤ f (u n) := fun k hk =>
hf (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (h_pos n)) (mem_Ico.mp hk).1
convert sum_le_sum this
simp [pow_succ, mul_two]
theorem le_sum_condensed' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ Ico 1 (2 ^ n), f k) ≤ ∑ k ∈ range n, 2 ^ k • f (2 ^ k) := by
convert le_sum_schlomilch' hf (fun n => pow_pos zero_lt_two n)
(fun m n hm => pow_right_mono₀ one_le_two hm) n using 2
simp [pow_succ, mul_two, two_mul]
theorem le_sum_schlomilch (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (h_pos : ∀ n, 0 < u n)
(hu : Monotone u) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range (u n), f k) ≤
∑ k ∈ range (u 0), f k + ∑ k ∈ range n, (u (k + 1) - u k) • f (u k) := by
convert add_le_add_left (le_sum_schlomilch' hf h_pos hu n) (∑ k ∈ range (u 0), f k)
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ (hu n.zero_le)]
theorem le_sum_condensed (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
| (∑ k ∈ range (2 ^ n), f k) ≤ f 0 + ∑ k ∈ range n, 2 ^ k • f (2 ^ k) := by
convert add_le_add_left (le_sum_condensed' hf n) (f 0)
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ n.one_le_two_pow, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero, zero_add]
| Mathlib/Analysis/PSeries.lean | 78 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE (ℤ√d) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
· exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro _ h))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· dsimp
rw [add_comm, add_comm (y : ℤ)]
exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : Nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show _ ↔ Nonneg _ by simp
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show Nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩ from
match z - x, w - y, Int.le.dest_sub xz, Int.le.dest_sub yw with
| _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => trivial
open Int in
protected theorem nonneg_total : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Nonneg a ∨ Nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ => Or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨(_ + 1 : ℕ), -[_+1]⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
| ⟨-[_+1], (_ + 1 : ℕ)⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
have t := (b - a).nonneg_total
rwa [neg_sub] at t
instance preorder : Preorder (ℤ√d) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := show Nonneg (a - a) by simp only [sub_self]; trivial
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by simpa [sub_add_sub_cancel'] using hab.add hbc
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := (and_iff_right_of_imp (Zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm
open Int in
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃ n : ℕ, a ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ : ∃ x y : ℕ, Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a) :=
match -a with
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨0, 0, by trivial⟩
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨0, y + 1, by simp [add_def, Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨x + 1, 0, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨x + 1, y + 1, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
refine ⟨x + d * y, h.trans ?_⟩
change Nonneg ⟨↑x + d * y - ↑x, 0 - ↑y⟩
rcases y with - | y
· simp
trivial
have h : ∀ y, SqLe y d (d * y) 1 := fun y => by
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (Nat.le_mul_self d)
rw [show (x : ℤ) + d * Nat.succ y - x = d * Nat.succ y by simp]
exact h (y + 1)
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show Nonneg _ by rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]; exact ab
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b := by
simpa using Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b := fun h' =>
h (Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg ((n : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast n]
exact
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => by rw [smul_val]; trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val, mul_neg]
apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val]
apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) := by
have : (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = (x : ℤ√d) * a + sqrtd * ((y : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [this]
exact (nonneg_smul ha).add (nonneg_muld <| nonneg_smul ha)
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _, _ => trivial
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2
(sqLe_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b := by
simp_rw [← nonneg_iff_zero_le]
exact nonneg_mul
theorem not_sqLe_succ (c d y) (h : 0 < c) : ¬SqLe (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt <| mul_pos (mul_pos h <| Nat.succ_pos _) <| Nat.succ_pos _
-- Porting note: renamed field and added theorem to make `x` explicit
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class Nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop where
ns' : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n
theorem Nonsquare.ns (x : ℕ) [Nonsquare x] : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n := ns'
variable [dnsq : Nonsquare d]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) <| Ne.symm <| Nonsquare.ns d 0
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y
Or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(fun H => ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩) fun gpos =>
False.elim <| by
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime _ _
rw [hx, hy] at h
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_pos gpos gpos).ne' ?_
-- Porting note: was `simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h`
calc
g * g * (m * m)
_ = m * g * (m * g) := by ring
_ = d * (n * g) * (n * g) := h
_ = g * g * (d * (n * n)) := by ring
have co2 :=
let co1 := co.mul_right co
co1.mul co1
exact
Nonsquare.ns d m
(Nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw [this]; apply dvd_mul_right) <|
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <| by simp [this])
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero_z {x y : ℤ} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natCast_mul, ← mul_assoc] at h
exact
let ⟨h1, h2⟩ := divides_sq_eq_zero (Int.ofNat.inj h)
⟨Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h1, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h2⟩
theorem not_divides_sq (x y) : (x + 1) * (x + 1) ≠ d * (y + 1) * (y + 1) := fun e => by
have t := (divides_sq_eq_zero e).left
contradiction
open Int in
theorem nonneg_antisymm : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → Nonneg (-a) → a = 0
| ⟨0, 0⟩, _, _ => rfl
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => False.elim xy
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => False.elim yx
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), 0⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨0, (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨(x + 1 : Nat), -[y+1]⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm yx xy
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
| ⟨-[x+1], (y + 1 : Nat)⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm xy yx
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℤ√d} (ab : a ≤ b) (ba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| nonneg_antisymm ba (by rwa [neg_sub])
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.preorder with
le_antisymm := fun _ _ => Zsqrtd.le_antisymm
le_total := Zsqrtd.le_total
toDecidableLE := Zsqrtd.decidableLE
toDecidableEq := inferInstance }
protected theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : ℤ√d}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
| ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨z, w⟩, h => by
injection h with h1 h2
have h1 : x * z = -(d * y * w) := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left h1
have h2 : x * w = -(y * z) := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left h2
have fin : x * x = d * y * y → (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = 0 := fun e =>
match x, y, divides_sq_eq_zero_z e with
| _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
exact
if z0 : z = 0 then
if w0 : w = 0 then
Or.inr
(match z, w, z0, w0 with
| _, _, rfl, rfl => rfl)
else
Or.inl <|
fin <|
mul_right_cancel₀ w0 <|
calc
x * x * w = -y * (x * z) := by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
_ = d * y * y * w := by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
else
Or.inl <|
fin <|
mul_right_cancel₀ z0 <|
calc
x * x * z = d * -y * (x * w) := by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
_ = d * y * y * z := by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
instance : NoZeroDivisors (ℤ√d) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := Zsqrtd.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
instance : IsDomain (ℤ√d) :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
protected theorem mul_pos (a b : ℤ√d) (a0 : 0 < a) (b0 : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := fun ab =>
Or.elim
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
(le_antisymm ab (Zsqrtd.mul_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt a0) (le_of_lt b0))))
(fun e => ne_of_gt a0 e) fun e => ne_of_gt b0 e
instance : ZeroLEOneClass (ℤ√d) :=
{ zero_le_one := by trivial }
instance : IsOrderedAddMonoid (ℤ√d) :=
{ add_le_add_left := Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left }
instance : IsStrictOrderedRing (ℤ√d) :=
.of_mul_pos Zsqrtd.mul_pos
end
theorem norm_eq_zero {d : ℤ} (h_nonsquare : ∀ n : ℤ, d ≠ n * n) (a : ℤ√d) : norm a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun ha => Zsqrtd.ext_iff.mpr ?_, fun h => by rw [h, norm_zero]⟩
dsimp only [norm] at ha
rw [sub_eq_zero] at ha
by_cases h : 0 ≤ d
· obtain ⟨d', rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le h
haveI : Nonsquare d' := ⟨fun n h => h_nonsquare n <| mod_cast h⟩
exact divides_sq_eq_zero_z ha
· push_neg at h
suffices a.re * a.re = 0 by
rw [eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero this] at ha ⊢
simpa only [true_and, or_self_right, zero_re, zero_im, eq_self_iff_true, zero_eq_mul,
mul_zero, mul_eq_zero, h.ne, false_or, or_self_iff] using ha
apply _root_.le_antisymm _ (mul_self_nonneg _)
rw [ha, mul_assoc]
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg h.le (mul_self_nonneg _)
variable {R : Type}
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext [NonAssocRing R] {d : ℤ} (f g : ℤ√d →+* R) (h : f sqrtd = g sqrtd) : f = g := by
ext ⟨x_re, x_im⟩
simp [decompose, h]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- The unique `RingHom` from `ℤ√d` to a ring `R`, constructed by replacing `√d` with the provided
root. Conversely, this associates to every mapping `ℤ√d →+* R` a value of `√d` in `R`. -/
@[simps]
def lift {d : ℤ} : { r : R // r * r = ↑d } ≃ (ℤ√d →+* R) where
toFun r :=
{ toFun := fun a => a.1 + a.2 * (r : R)
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := fun a b => by
simp only [add_re, Int.cast_add, add_im]
ring
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun a b => by
have :
(a.re + a.im * r : R) * (b.re + b.im * r) =
a.re * b.re + (a.re * b.im + a.im * b.re) * r + a.im * b.im * (r * r) := by
ring
simp only [mul_re, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, mul_im, this, r.prop]
ring }
invFun f := ⟨f sqrtd, by rw [← f.map_mul, dmuld, map_intCast]⟩
left_inv r := by simp
right_inv f := by
ext
simp
/-- `lift r` is injective if `d` is non-square, and R has characteristic zero (that is, the map from
`ℤ` into `R` is injective). -/
theorem lift_injective [CharZero R] {d : ℤ} (r : { r : R // r * r = ↑d })
(hd : ∀ n : ℤ, d ≠ n * n) : Function.Injective (lift r) :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero (lift r)).mpr fun a ha => by
have h_inj : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℤ → R) := Int.cast_injective
suffices lift r a.norm = 0 by
simp only [intCast_re, add_zero, lift_apply_apply, intCast_im, Int.cast_zero,
zero_mul] at this
rwa [← Int.cast_zero, h_inj.eq_iff, norm_eq_zero hd] at this
rw [norm_eq_mul_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ha, zero_mul]
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm equal to `1` if and only if it is contained in the submonoid
of unitary elements. -/
theorem norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} : a.norm = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [unitary.mem_iff_self_mul_star, ← norm_eq_mul_conj]
norm_cast
/-- The kernel of the norm map on `ℤ√d` equals the submonoid of unitary elements. -/
theorem mker_norm_eq_unitary {d : ℤ} : MonoidHom.mker (@normMonoidHom d) = unitary (ℤ√d) :=
Submonoid.ext fun _ => norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary
|
end Zsqrtd
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 931 | 932 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
protected theorem Involutive.preimage {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) : Involutive (preimage f) :=
hf.rightInverse.preimage_preimage
end Function
namespace EquivLike
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} {E : Type*} [EquivLike E ι ι']
@[simp] lemma range_comp {α : Type*} (f : ι' → α) (e : E) : range (f ∘ e) = range f :=
(EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _
end EquivLike
/-! ### Image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace Subtype
variable {α : Type*}
theorem coe_image {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} :
(↑) '' s = { x | ∃ h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun a =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩ => h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩, fun ⟨ha, in_s⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : (↑) '' { x : ↥s | ↑x ∈ t } = t := by
ext x
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', hx⟩ => hx ▸ hx', fun hx => ⟨⟨x, h hx⟩, hx, rfl⟩⟩
theorem range_coe {s : Set α} : range ((↑) : s → α) = s := by
rw [← image_univ]
simp [-image_univ, coe_image]
/-- A variant of `range_coe`. Try to use `range_coe` if possible.
This version is useful when defining a new type that is defined as the subtype of something.
In that case, the coercion doesn't fire anymore. -/
theorem range_val {s : Set α} : range (Subtype.val : s → α) = s :=
range_coe
/-- We make this the simp lemma instead of `range_coe`. The reason is that if we write
for `s : Set α` the function `(↑) : s → α`, then the inferred implicit arguments of `(↑)` are
`↑α (fun x ↦ x ∈ s)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range ((↑) : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_self (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' s = univ := by
rw [← preimage_range, range_coe]
theorem range_val_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
theorem coe_image_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set s) : ((↑) : s → α) '' t ⊆ s :=
fun x ⟨y, _, yvaleq⟩ => by
rw [← yvaleq]; exact y.property
theorem coe_image_univ (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' Set.univ = s :=
image_univ.trans range_coe
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_coe (s t : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_eq_range_inter.trans <| congr_arg (· ∩ t) range_coe
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : Set α) : (Subtype.val : s → α) '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_coe s t
theorem preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff {s t u : Set α} :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe, coe_injective.image_injective.eq_iff]
theorem preimage_coe_self_inter (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, ← inter_assoc, inter_self]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_inter_self (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (t ∩ s) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_coe_self_inter]
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val : s → α) ⁻¹' t = Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff
lemma preimage_val_subset_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val ⁻¹' t : Set s) ⊆ Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u := by
constructor
· rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe]
exact image_subset _
· intro h x a
exact (h ⟨x.2, a⟩).2
theorem exists_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∃ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∃ s : Set α, s ⊆ t ∧ p s := by
rw [← exists_subset_range_and_iff, range_coe]
theorem forall_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∀ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s ⊆ t → p s := by
rw [← forall_subset_range_iff, range_coe]
theorem preimage_coe_nonempty {s t : Set α} :
(((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, image_nonempty]
theorem preimage_coe_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ∅ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, preimage_coe_nonempty]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_compl (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' sᶜ = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (inter_compl_self s)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_compl' (s : Set α) :
(fun x : (sᶜ : Set α) => (x : α)) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (compl_inter_self s)
end Subtype
/-! ### Images and preimages on `Option` -/
open Set
namespace Option
theorem injective_iff {α β} {f : Option α → β} :
Injective f ↔ Injective (f ∘ some) ∧ f none ∉ range (f ∘ some) := by
simp only [mem_range, not_exists, (· ∘ ·)]
refine
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.comp (Option.some_injective _), fun x => hf.ne <| Option.some_ne_none _⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h_some, h_none⟩ (_ | a) (_ | b) hab
exacts [rfl, (h_none _ hab.symm).elim, (h_none _ hab).elim, congr_arg some (h_some hab)]
theorem range_eq {α β} (f : Option α → β) : range f = insert (f none) (range (f ∘ some)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => Option.exists.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
end Option
namespace Set
open Function
/-! ### Injectivity and surjectivity lemmas for image and preimage -/
section ImagePreimage
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem image_surjective : Surjective (image f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h y => ?_, Surjective.image_surjective⟩
rcases h {y} with ⟨s, hs⟩
have := mem_singleton y; rw [← hs] at this; rcases this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_injective : Injective (image f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x x' hx => ?_, Injective.image_injective⟩
rw [← singleton_eq_singleton_iff]; apply h
rw [image_singleton, image_singleton, hx]
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
f ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = f '' t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ f '' s = t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
end ImagePreimage
end Set
/-! ### Disjoint lemmas for image and preimage -/
section Disjoint
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem Disjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx => h.le_bot hx
lemma Codisjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Codisjoint s t) :
Codisjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff_le_sup, Set.sup_eq_union, top_le_iff, ← Set.preimage_union] at h ⊢
rw [h]; rfl
lemma IsCompl.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : IsCompl s t) :
IsCompl (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
⟨h.1.preimage f, h.2.preimage f⟩
namespace Set
theorem disjoint_image_image {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ}
| (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, f b ≠ g c) : Disjoint (f '' s) (g '' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by rintro a ⟨⟨b, hb, eq⟩, c, hc, rfl⟩; exact h b hb c hc eq
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,333 | 1,334 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
|
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 73 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
| rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 728 | 729 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
- Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : α ⊕ (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {f : t.varFinset → β}
{v : β → M} (v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(t.restrictVar f).realize v = t.realize v' := by
induction t with
| var => simp [restrictVar, hv']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i ((by simp [Function.comp_apply, hv'])))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar' [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v :=
realize_restrictVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)}
{f : t.varFinsetLeft → β}
{xs : β ⊕ γ → M} (xs' : α → M) (hxs' : ∀ a, xs (Sum.inl (f a)) = xs' a) :
(t.restrictVarLeft f).realize xs = t.realize (Sum.elim xs' (xs ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
induction t with
| var a => cases a <;> simp [restrictVarLeft, hxs']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (by simp [hxs']))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVarLeft`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft' [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
realize_restrictVarLeft _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => simp
| @func n f ts ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· obtain - | f := f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (α ⊕ β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction t with
| var ab => rcases ab with a | b <;> simp [Language.con]
| func f ts ih =>
simp only [realize, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, ih, varsToConstants]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem HomClass.realize_term {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N]
(g : F) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, HomClass.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, max, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
| theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 323 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LocalExtr.Basic
/-!
# Darboux's theorem
In this file we prove that the derivative of a differentiable function on an interval takes all
intermediate values. The proof is based on the
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darboux%27s_theorem_(analysis)) page about this theorem.
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Topology
variable {a b : ℝ} {f f' : ℝ → ℝ}
/-- **Darboux's theorem**: if `a ≤ b` and `f' a < m < f' b`, then `f' c = m` for some
`c ∈ (a, b)`. -/
theorem exists_hasDerivWithinAt_eq_of_gt_of_lt (hab : a ≤ b)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x) {m : ℝ} (hma : f' a < m)
(hmb : m < f' b) : m ∈ f' '' Ioo a b := by
rcases hab.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hab')
· exact (lt_asymm hma hmb).elim
set g : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => f x - m * x
have hg : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x - m) (Icc a b) x := by
intro x hx
simpa using (hf x hx).sub ((hasDerivWithinAt_id x _).const_mul m)
obtain ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Icc a b, IsMinOn g (Icc a b) c :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMinOn (nonempty_Icc.2 <| hab) fun x hx => (hg x hx).continuousWithinAt
have cmem' : c ∈ Ioo a b := by
rcases cmem.1.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hac)
-- Show that `c` can't be equal to `a`
· refine absurd (sub_nonneg.1 <| nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right ?_ (sub_pos.2 hab'))
(not_le_of_lt hma)
have : b - a ∈ posTangentConeAt (Icc a b) a :=
sub_mem_posTangentConeAt_of_segment_subset (segment_eq_Icc hab ▸ Subset.rfl)
simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply]
using hc.localize.hasFDerivWithinAt_nonneg (hg a (left_mem_Icc.2 hab)) this
rcases cmem.2.eq_or_gt with (rfl | hcb)
-- Show that `c` can't be equal to `b`
· refine absurd (sub_nonpos.1 <| nonpos_of_mul_nonneg_right ?_ (sub_lt_zero.2 hab'))
(not_le_of_lt hmb)
have : a - b ∈ posTangentConeAt (Icc a b) b :=
sub_mem_posTangentConeAt_of_segment_subset (by rw [segment_symm, segment_eq_Icc hab])
simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply]
using hc.localize.hasFDerivWithinAt_nonneg (hg b (right_mem_Icc.2 hab)) this
exact ⟨hac, hcb⟩
use c, cmem'
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
have : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 c := by rwa [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_Icc]
exact (hc.isLocalMin this).hasDerivAt_eq_zero ((hg c cmem).hasDerivAt this)
/-- **Darboux's theorem**: if `a ≤ b` and `f' b < m < f' a`, then `f' c = m` for some `c ∈ (a, b)`.
-/
theorem exists_hasDerivWithinAt_eq_of_lt_of_gt (hab : a ≤ b)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x) {m : ℝ} (hma : m < f' a)
(hmb : f' b < m) : m ∈ f' '' Ioo a b :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ :=
exists_hasDerivWithinAt_eq_of_gt_of_lt hab (fun x hx => (hf x hx).neg) (neg_lt_neg hma)
(neg_lt_neg hmb)
⟨c, cmem, neg_injective hc⟩
/-- **Darboux's theorem**: the image of a `Set.OrdConnected` set under `f'` is a `Set.OrdConnected`
set, `HasDerivWithinAt` version. -/
theorem Set.OrdConnected.image_hasDerivWithinAt {s : Set ℝ} (hs : OrdConnected s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) : OrdConnected (f' '' s) := by
apply ordConnected_of_Ioo
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ - m ⟨hma, hmb⟩
| rcases le_total a b with hab | hab
· have : Icc a b ⊆ s := hs.out ha hb
rcases exists_hasDerivWithinAt_eq_of_gt_of_lt hab (fun x hx => (hf x <| this hx).mono this) hma
hmb with
⟨c, cmem, hc⟩
exact ⟨c, this <| Ioo_subset_Icc_self cmem, hc⟩
· have : Icc b a ⊆ s := hs.out hb ha
rcases exists_hasDerivWithinAt_eq_of_lt_of_gt hab (fun x hx => (hf x <| this hx).mono this) hmb
hma with
⟨c, cmem, hc⟩
exact ⟨c, this <| Ioo_subset_Icc_self cmem, hc⟩
/-- **Darboux's theorem**: the image of a `Set.OrdConnected` set under `f'` is a `Set.OrdConnected`
set, `derivWithin` version. -/
theorem Set.OrdConnected.image_derivWithin {s : Set ℝ} (hs : OrdConnected s)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Darboux.lean | 76 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
/-!
# Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Inv MeasureTheory.Measure Module Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/- The instance `MeasureTheory.Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure.noAtoms` applies in particular to show that
an additive Haar measure on a nontrivial finite-dimensional real vector space has no atom. -/
example {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [Nontrivial E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] : NoAtoms μ := by
infer_instance
section LinearEquiv
variable {𝕜 G H : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace H] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace H] [AddCommGroup G] [AddCommGroup H]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup H] [Module 𝕜 G] [Module 𝕜 H] (μ : Measure G)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] [BorelSpace G] [BorelSpace H]
[CompleteSpace 𝕜] [T2Space G] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 G]
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 H] [T2Space H]
instance MapLinearEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure (e : G ≃ₗ[𝕜] H) : IsAddHaarMeasure (μ.map e) :=
e.toContinuousLinearEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map _
end LinearEquiv
section SeminormedGroup
variable {G H : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] [BorelSpace G] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
[MeasurableSpace H] [SeminormedGroup H] [OpensMeasurableSpace H]
-- TODO: This could be streamlined by proving that inner regular measures always exist
open Metric Bornology in
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.MonoidHom.exists_nhds_isBounded (f : G →* H) (hf : Measurable f) (x : G) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, IsBounded (f '' s) := by
let K : PositiveCompacts G := Classical.arbitrary _
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < haar (interior K ∩ f ⁻¹' ball 1 n) := by
by_contra!
simp_rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← measure_iUnion_null_iff, ← inter_iUnion, ← preimage_iUnion,
iUnion_ball_nat, preimage_univ, inter_univ] at this
exact this.not_gt <| isOpen_interior.measure_pos _ K.interior_nonempty
rw [← one_mul x, ← op_smul_eq_mul]
refine ⟨_, smul_mem_nhds_smul _ <| div_mem_nhds_one_of_haar_pos_ne_top haar _
(isOpen_interior.measurableSet.inter <| hf measurableSet_ball) hn <|
mt (measure_mono_top <| inter_subset_left.trans interior_subset) K.isCompact.measure_ne_top,
?_⟩
have : Bornology.IsBounded (f '' (interior K ∩ f ⁻¹' ball 1 n)) :=
isBounded_ball.subset <| (image_mono inter_subset_right).trans <| image_preimage_subset _ _
rw [image_op_smul_distrib, image_div]
exact (this.div this).smul _
end SeminormedGroup
/-- A Borel-measurable group hom from a locally compact normed group to a real normed space is
continuous. -/
lemma AddMonoidHom.continuous_of_measurable {G H : Type*}
[SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup H] [MeasurableSpace H] [OpensMeasurableSpace H] [NormedSpace ℝ H]
(f : G →+ H) (hf : Measurable f) : Continuous f :=
let ⟨_s, hs, hbdd⟩ := f.exists_nhds_isBounded hf 0; f.continuous_of_isBounded_nhds_zero hs hbdd
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The integral of `f (R • x)` with respect to an additive Haar measure is a multiple of the
integral of `f`. The formula we give works even when `f` is not integrable or `R = 0`
thanks to the convention that a non-integrable function has integral zero. -/
theorem integral_comp_smul (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) :
∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hF : CompleteSpace F; swap
· simp [integral, hF]
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with (rfl | hR)
· simp only [zero_smul, integral_const]
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (finrank ℝ E) with (hE | hE)
· have : Subsingleton E := finrank_zero_iff.1 hE
have : f = fun _ => f 0 := by ext x; rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0]
conv_rhs => rw [this]
simp only [hE, pow_zero, inv_one, abs_one, one_smul, integral_const]
· have : Nontrivial E := finrank_pos_iff.1 hE
simp [zero_pow hE.ne', measure_univ_of_isAddLeftInvariant, measureReal_def]
· calc
(∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ) = ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map (fun x => R • x) μ :=
(integral_map_equiv (Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hR).unit).toMeasurableEquiv
f).symm
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [map_addHaar_smul μ hR, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal, abs_nonneg]
/-- The integral of `f (R • x)` with respect to an additive Haar measure is a multiple of the
integral of `f`. The formula we give works even when `f` is not integrable or `R = 0`
thanks to the convention that a non-integrable function has integral zero. -/
theorem integral_comp_smul_of_nonneg (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) {hR : 0 ≤ R} :
∫ x, f (R • x) ∂μ = (R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_smul μ f R, abs_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (pow_nonneg hR _))]
/-- The integral of `f (R⁻¹ • x)` with respect to an additive Haar measure is a multiple of the
integral of `f`. The formula we give works even when `f` is not integrable or `R = 0`
thanks to the convention that a non-integrable function has integral zero. -/
theorem integral_comp_inv_smul (f : E → F) (R : ℝ) :
∫ x, f (R⁻¹ • x) ∂μ = |R ^ finrank ℝ E| • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_smul μ f R⁻¹, inv_pow, inv_inv]
/-- The integral of `f (R⁻¹ • x)` with respect to an additive Haar measure is a multiple of the
integral of `f`. The formula we give works even when `f` is not integrable or `R = 0`
thanks to the convention that a non-integrable function has integral zero. -/
theorem integral_comp_inv_smul_of_nonneg (f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) :
∫ x, f (R⁻¹ • x) ∂μ = R ^ finrank ℝ E • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_comp_inv_smul μ f R, abs_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg hR _)]
theorem setIntegral_comp_smul (f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (s : Set E) (hR : R ≠ 0) :
∫ x in s, f (R • x) ∂μ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x in R • s, f x ∂μ := by
let e : E ≃ᵐ E := (Homeomorph.smul (Units.mk0 R hR)).toMeasurableEquiv
calc
∫ x in s, f (R • x) ∂μ
= ∫ x in e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s), f (e x) ∂μ := by simp [← preimage_comp]; rfl
_ = ∫ y in e.symm ⁻¹' s, f y ∂map (fun x ↦ R • x) μ := (setIntegral_map_equiv _ _ _).symm
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ y in e.symm ⁻¹' s, f y ∂μ := by
simp [map_addHaar_smul μ hR, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal, abs_nonneg]
_ = |(R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹| • ∫ x in R • s, f x ∂μ := by
congr
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hR]
rfl
theorem setIntegral_comp_smul_of_pos (f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (s : Set E) (hR : 0 < R) :
∫ x in s, f (R • x) ∂μ = (R ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹ • ∫ x in R • s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_comp_smul μ f s hR.ne', abs_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (pow_nonneg hR.le _))]
theorem integral_comp_mul_left (g : ℝ → F) (a : ℝ) :
(∫ x : ℝ, g (a * x)) = |a⁻¹| • ∫ y : ℝ, g y := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_mul, Measure.integral_comp_smul, Module.finrank_self, pow_one]
theorem integral_comp_inv_mul_left (g : ℝ → F) (a : ℝ) :
(∫ x : ℝ, g (a⁻¹ * x)) = |a| • ∫ y : ℝ, g y := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_mul, Measure.integral_comp_inv_smul, Module.finrank_self, pow_one]
theorem integral_comp_mul_right (g : ℝ → F) (a : ℝ) :
(∫ x : ℝ, g (x * a)) = |a⁻¹| • ∫ y : ℝ, g y := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using integral_comp_mul_left g a
theorem integral_comp_inv_mul_right (g : ℝ → F) (a : ℝ) :
(∫ x : ℝ, g (x * a⁻¹)) = |a| • ∫ y : ℝ, g y := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using integral_comp_inv_mul_left g a
theorem integral_comp_div (g : ℝ → F) (a : ℝ) : (∫ x : ℝ, g (x / a)) = |a| • ∫ y : ℝ, g y :=
integral_comp_inv_mul_right g a
end Measure
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem integrable_comp_smul_iff {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(f : E → F) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Integrable (fun x => f (R • x)) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
-- reduce to one-way implication
suffices
∀ {g : E → F} (_ : Integrable g μ) {S : ℝ} (_ : S ≠ 0), Integrable (fun x => g (S • x)) μ by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf => this hf hR⟩
convert this hf (inv_ne_zero hR)
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hR, one_smul]
-- now prove
intro g hg S hS
let t := ((Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hS).unit).toMeasurableEquiv : E ≃ᵐ E)
refine (integrable_map_equiv t g).mp (?_ : Integrable g (map (S • ·) μ))
rwa [map_addHaar_smul μ hS, integrable_smul_measure _ ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, abs_pos] using inv_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hS)
| theorem Integrable.comp_smul {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] {μ : Measure E} [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
{f : E → F} (hf : Integrable f μ) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Integrable (fun x => f (R • x)) μ :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/NormedSpace.lean | 186 | 188 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cyclic groups
A group `G` is called cyclic if there exists an element `g : G` such that every element of `G` is of
the form `g ^ n` for some `n : ℕ`. This file only deals with the predicate on a group to be cyclic.
For the concrete cyclic group of order `n`, see `Data.ZMod.Basic`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclic` is a predicate on a group stating that the group is cyclic.
## Main statements
* `isCyclic_of_prime_card` proves that a finite group of prime order is cyclic.
* `isSimpleGroup_of_prime_card`, `IsSimpleGroup.isCyclic`,
and `IsSimpleGroup.prime_card` classify finite simple abelian groups.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_card`: For a finite cyclic group `G`, the exponent is equal to
the group's cardinality.
* `IsCyclic.exponent_eq_zero_of_infinite`: Infinite cyclic groups have exponent zero.
* `IsCyclic.iff_exponent_eq_card`: A finite commutative group is cyclic iff its exponent
is equal to its cardinality.
## Tags
cyclic group
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
variable {α G G' : Type*} {a : α}
section Cyclic
open Subgroup
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.exists_generator [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g :=
exists_zpow_surjective α
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top [Group α] : IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, zpowers g = ⊤ := by
simp only [eq_top_iff', mem_zpowers_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Subgroup.isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top [Group α] (H : Subgroup α) :
IsCyclic H ↔ ∃ g : α, Subgroup.zpowers g = H := by
rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top]
simp_rw [← (map_injective H.subtype_injective).eq_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_map,
H.range_subtype, MonoidHom.map_zpowers, Subtype.exists, coe_subtype, exists_prop]
exact exists_congr fun g ↦ and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦ h ▸ mem_zpowers g
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) isCyclic_of_subsingleton [Group α] [Subsingleton α] : IsCyclic α :=
⟨⟨1, fun _ => ⟨0, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCyclic_multiplicative_iff [SubNegMonoid α] :
IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) ↔ IsAddCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isCyclic_multiplicative [AddGroup α] [IsAddCyclic α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) :=
isCyclic_multiplicative_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem isAddCyclic_additive_iff [DivInvMonoid α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) ↔ IsCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isAddCyclic_additive [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) :=
isAddCyclic_additive_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[to_additive]
instance IsCyclic.commutative [Group α] [IsCyclic α] :
Std.Commutative (· * · : α → α → α) where
comm x y :=
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
let ⟨_, hx⟩ := hg x
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hg y
hy ▸ hx ▸ zpow_mul_comm _ _ _
/-- A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have a better
proof of `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have
a better proof of `AddCommGroup`."]
def IsCyclic.commGroup [hg : Group α] [IsCyclic α] : CommGroup α :=
{ hg with mul_comm := commutative.comm }
instance [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [IsCyclic H] : IsMulCommutative H :=
⟨IsCyclic.commutative⟩
variable [Group α] [Group G] [Group G']
/-- A non-cyclic multiplicative group is non-trivial. -/
@[to_additive "A non-cyclic additive group is non-trivial."]
theorem Nontrivial.of_not_isCyclic (nc : ¬IsCyclic α) : Nontrivial α := by
contrapose! nc
exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton _ _ (not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp nc)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_cyclic [h : IsCyclic G] (σ : G →* G) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ g : G, σ g = g ^ m := by
obtain ⟨h, hG⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hG (σ h)
refine ⟨m, fun g => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hG g
rw [MonoidHom.map_zpow, ← hm, ← zpow_mul, ← zpow_mul']
@[to_additive]
lemma isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard [Finite α] :
IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
simp_rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_zpowers_eq_top, ← card_eq_iff_eq_top, Nat.card_zpowers]
@[to_additive]
lemma isCyclic_iff_exists_natCard_le_orderOf [Finite α] :
IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, Nat.card α ≤ orderOf g := by
rw [isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard]
apply exists_congr
intro g
exact ⟨Eq.ge, le_antisymm orderOf_le_card⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias isCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard := isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias isAddCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard := isAddCyclic_iff_exists_addOrderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias IsCyclic.iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard_of_Fintype :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias IsAddCyclic.iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard_of_Fintype :=
isAddCyclic_iff_exists_addOrderOf_eq_natCard
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card [Finite α] (x : α) (hx : orderOf x = Nat.card α) :
IsCyclic α :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_orderOf_eq_natCard.mpr ⟨x, hx⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_card_le_orderOf [Finite α] (x : α) (hx : Nat.card α ≤ orderOf x) :
IsCyclic α :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_natCard_le_orderOf.mpr ⟨x, hx⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
(H : Subgroup G) [hp : Fact (Nat.card G).Prime] : H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero hp.1.ne_zero
have := card_subgroup_dvd_card H
rwa [Nat.dvd_prime hp.1, ← eq_bot_iff_card, card_eq_iff_eq_top] at this
/-- Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group. -/
@[to_additive "Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group."]
theorem zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Nat.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : zpowers g = ⊤ := by
subst h
have := (zpowers g).eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
rwa [zpowers_eq_bot, or_iff_right hg] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_zpowers_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ zpowers g := by
simp_rw [zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card h hg, Subgroup.mem_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ Submonoid.powers g := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (h ▸ hp.1.ne_zero)
rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg
@[to_additive]
theorem powers_eq_top_of_prime_card {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Nat.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : Submonoid.powers g = ⊤ := by
ext x
simp [mem_powers_of_prime_card h hg]
/-- A finite group of prime order is cyclic. -/
@[to_additive "A finite group of prime order is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_prime_card {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card α = p) : IsCyclic α := by
have : Finite α := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (h ▸ hp.1.ne_zero)
have : Nontrivial α := Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp (h ▸ hp.1.one_lt)
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : α, g ≠ 1 := exists_ne 1
exact ⟨g, fun g' ↦ mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg⟩
/-- A finite group of order dividing a prime is cyclic. -/
@[to_additive "A finite group of order dividing a prime is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_card_dvd_prime {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Nat.card α ∣ p) : IsCyclic α := by
rcases (Nat.dvd_prime hp.out).mp h with h | h
· exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton α _ (Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mp h).1
· exact isCyclic_of_prime_card h
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_surjective {F : Type*} [hH : IsCyclic G']
[FunLike F G' G] [MonoidHomClass F G' G] (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
IsCyclic G := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hH
refine ⟨f x, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf a
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hx a
exact ⟨n, (map_zpow _ _ _).symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers {g : α} (hx : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) :
orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
rw [← Nat.card_zpowers, (zpowers g).eq_top_iff'.mpr hx, card_top]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-15")]
alias orderOf_generator_eq_natCard := orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-15")]
alias addOrderOf_generator_eq_natCard := addOrderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic [G_cyclic : IsCyclic G]
{k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Nat.card G) : ∃ a : G, a ^ k ≠ 1 := by
have : Finite G := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (Nat.ne_zero_of_lt k_lt_card_G)
rcases G_cyclic with ⟨a, ha⟩
use a
contrapose! k_lt_card_G
convert orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt k_lt_card_G
rw [← Nat.card_zpowers, eq_comm, card_eq_iff_eq_top, eq_top_iff]
exact fun x _ ↦ ha x
@[to_additive]
theorem Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Infinite α] {g : α}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) : orderOf g = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers h, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
@[to_additive]
instance Bot.isCyclic : IsCyclic (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => ⟨0, Subtype.eq <| (zpow_zero (1 : α)).trans <| Eq.symm (Subgroup.mem_bot.1 x.2)⟩⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Subgroup.isCyclic [IsCyclic α] (H : Subgroup α) : IsCyclic H :=
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
if hx : ∃ x : α, x ∈ H ∧ x ≠ (1 : α) then
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := hx
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ g ^ n ∈ H :=
⟨k.natAbs,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => hx₂ <| by
rw [← hk, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h, zpow_zero], by
rcases k with k | k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natAbs_cast k, ← zpow_natCast, ← Int.ofNat_eq_coe, hk]
exact hx₁
· rw [Int.natAbs_negSucc, ← Subgroup.inv_mem_iff H]; simp_all⟩
⟨⟨⟨g ^ Nat.find hex, (Nat.find_spec hex).2⟩, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hk₂ : g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) ∈ H := by
rw [zpow_mul]
apply H.zpow_mem
exact mod_cast (Nat.find_spec hex).2
have hk₃ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex : ℤ) ∈ H :=
(Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right H hk₂).1 <| by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.emod_add_ediv, hk]; exact hx
have hk₄ : k % Nat.find hex = (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs := by
rw [Int.natAbs_of_nonneg
(Int.emod_nonneg _ (Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))]
have hk₅ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs ∈ H := by rwa [← zpow_natCast, ← hk₄]
have hk₆ : (k % (Nat.find hex : ℤ)).natAbs = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h =>
Nat.find_min hex
(Int.ofNat_lt.1 <| by
rw [← hk₄]; exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))
⟨Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h, hk₅⟩
⟨k / (Nat.find hex : ℤ),
Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
(by
suffices g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) = x by simpa [zpow_mul]
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel'
(Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero (Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp hk₆)),
hk])⟩⟩⟩
else by
have : H = (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
Subgroup.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => by simp at *; tauto, fun h => by rw [Subgroup.mem_bot.1 h]; exact H.one_mem⟩
subst this; infer_instance
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_injective [IsCyclic G'] (f : G →* G') (hf : Function.Injective f) :
IsCyclic G :=
isCyclic_of_surjective (MonoidHom.ofInjective hf).symm (MonoidHom.ofInjective hf).symm.surjective
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.isCyclic_of_le {H H' : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ H') [IsCyclic H'] : IsCyclic H :=
isCyclic_of_injective (Subgroup.inclusion h) (Subgroup.inclusion_injective h)
open Finset Nat
section Classical
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive IsAddCyclic.card_nsmul_eq_zero_le]
theorem IsCyclic.card_pow_eq_one_le [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [IsCyclic α] {n : ℕ} (hn0 : 0 < n) :
#{a : α | a ^ n = 1} ≤ n :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
calc
#{a : α | a ^ n = 1} ≤
#(zpowers (g ^ (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α))) : Set α).toFinset :=
card_le_card fun x hx =>
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := show x ∈ Submonoid.powers g from mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.2 <| hg x
Set.mem_toFinset.2
⟨(m / (Fintype.card α / Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) : ℕ), by
dsimp at hm
have hgmn : g ^ (m * Nat.gcd n (Fintype.card α)) = 1 := by
rw [pow_mul, hm, ← pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff]; exact (mem_filter.1 hx).2
dsimp only
rw [zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left', hm]
refine Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (gcd_pos_of_pos_left (Fintype.card α) hn0) ?_
conv_lhs =>
rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg]
exact orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hgmn⟩
_ ≤ n := by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := Nat.gcd_dvd_right n (Fintype.card α)
have hm0 : 0 < m :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hm0 => by
rw [hm0, mul_zero, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hm
exact hm.elim' 1
simp only [Set.toFinset_card, SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers, orderOf_pow g, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg,
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
nth_rw 2 [hm]; nth_rw 3 [hm]
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ hn0), gcd_mul_left_left, hm,
Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hm0]
exact le_of_dvd hn0 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)
end Classical
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.exists_monoid_generator [Finite α] [IsCyclic α] :
∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y ∈ Submonoid.powers x := by
simp_rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact IsCyclic.exists_generator
@[to_additive]
lemma IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard [h : IsCyclic α] : ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h.exists_generator
use g
rw [← card_zpowers g, (eq_top_iff' (zpowers g)).mpr hg]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
variable (G) in
/-- A distributive action of a monoid on a finite cyclic group of order `n` factors through an
action on `ZMod n`. -/
noncomputable def MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHomZModOfIsCyclic (M : Type*) [Monoid M]
[IsCyclic G] [MulDistribMulAction M G] {n : ℕ} (hn : Nat.card G = n) : M →* ZMod n where
toFun m := (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G m).map_cyclic.choose
map_one' := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard (α := G)
rw [← Int.cast_one, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, ← hn, ← hg, ← zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq,
zpow_one, ← (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G 1).map_cyclic.choose_spec,
MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply, one_smul]
map_mul' m n := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard (α := G)
rw [← Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, ← hn, ← hg, ← zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq,
zpow_mul', ← (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G m).map_cyclic.choose_spec,
← (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G n).map_cyclic.choose_spec,
← (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G (m * n)).map_cyclic.choose_spec,
MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply, MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply,
MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply, mul_smul]
theorem MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHomZModOfIsCyclic_apply {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [IsCyclic G]
[MulDistribMulAction M G] {n : ℕ} (hn : Nat.card G = n) (m : M) (g : G) (k : ℤ)
(h : toMonoidHomZModOfIsCyclic G M hn m = k) : m • g = g ^ k := by
rw [← MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom_apply,
(MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidHom G m).map_cyclic.choose_spec g, zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq]
apply Int.ModEq.of_dvd (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.mpr (orderOf_dvd_natCard g))
rwa [hn, ← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
section
variable [Fintype α]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.unique_zpow_zmod (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) (x : α) :
∃! n : ZMod (Fintype.card α), x = a ^ n.val := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := ha x
refine ⟨n, (?_ : a ^ n = _), fun y (hy : a ^ n = _) ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← zpow_natCast, zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha,
Int.modEq_comm, Int.modEq_iff_add_fac, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← ZMod.intCast_eq_iff]
· rw [← zpow_natCast, zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha,
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff] at hy
simp [hy]
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.image_range_orderOf (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) :
Finset.image (fun i => a ^ i) (range (orderOf a)) = univ := by
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe] at ha
simp only [_root_.image_range_orderOf, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr ha, Set.toFinset_univ]
@[to_additive]
| theorem IsCyclic.image_range_card (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) :
Finset.image (fun i => a ^ i) (range (Nat.card α)) = univ := by
rw [← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha, IsCyclic.image_range_orderOf ha]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsCyclic.ext [Finite G] [IsCyclic G] {d : ℕ} {a b : ZMod d}
(hGcard : Nat.card G = d) (h : ∀ t : G, t ^ a.val = t ^ b.val) : a = b := by
have : NeZero (Nat.card G) := ⟨Nat.card_pos.ne'⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
specialize h g
subst hGcard
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg,
← ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff] at h
simpa [ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id'] using h
end
section Totient
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (hn : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → #{a : α | a ^ n = 1} ≤ n)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Cyclic.lean | 414 | 433 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
| theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 246 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.FLT.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PythagoreanTriples
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Fermat's Last Theorem for the case n = 4
There are no non-zero integers `a`, `b` and `c` such that `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 4`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
/-- Shorthand for three non-zero integers `a`, `b`, and `c` satisfying `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2`.
We will show that no integers satisfy this equation. Clearly Fermat's Last theorem for n = 4
follows. -/
def Fermat42 (a b c : ℤ) : Prop :=
a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2
namespace Fermat42
theorem comm {a b c : ℤ} : Fermat42 a b c ↔ Fermat42 b a c := by
delta Fermat42
rw [add_comm]
tauto
theorem mul {a b c k : ℤ} (hk0 : k ≠ 0) :
Fermat42 a b c ↔ Fermat42 (k * a) (k * b) (k ^ 2 * c) := by
delta Fermat42
constructor
· intro f42
constructor
· exact mul_ne_zero hk0 f42.1
constructor
· exact mul_ne_zero hk0 f42.2.1
· have H : a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2 := f42.2.2
linear_combination k ^ 4 * H
· intro f42
constructor
· exact right_ne_zero_of_mul f42.1
constructor
· exact right_ne_zero_of_mul f42.2.1
apply (mul_right_inj' (pow_ne_zero 4 hk0)).mp
linear_combination f42.2.2
theorem ne_zero {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) : c ≠ 0 := by
apply ne_zero_pow two_ne_zero _; apply ne_of_gt
rw [← h.2.2, (by ring : a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = (a ^ 2) ^ 2 + (b ^ 2) ^ 2)]
exact
add_pos (sq_pos_of_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 h.1)) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 h.2.1))
/-- We say a solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` is minimal if there is no other solution with
a smaller `c` (in absolute value). -/
def Minimal (a b c : ℤ) : Prop :=
Fermat42 a b c ∧ ∀ a1 b1 c1 : ℤ, Fermat42 a1 b1 c1 → Int.natAbs c ≤ Int.natAbs c1
/-- if we have a solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` then there must be a minimal one. -/
theorem exists_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) : ∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 := by
classical
let S : Set ℕ := { n | ∃ s : ℤ × ℤ × ℤ, Fermat42 s.1 s.2.1 s.2.2 ∧ n = Int.natAbs s.2.2 }
have S_nonempty : S.Nonempty := by
use Int.natAbs c
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
use ⟨a, ⟨b, c⟩⟩
let m : ℕ := Nat.find S_nonempty
have m_mem : m ∈ S := Nat.find_spec S_nonempty
rcases m_mem with ⟨s0, hs0, hs1⟩
use s0.1, s0.2.1, s0.2.2, hs0
intro a1 b1 c1 h1
rw [← hs1]
apply Nat.find_min'
use ⟨a1, ⟨b1, c1⟩⟩
/-- a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` must have `a` and `b` coprime. -/
theorem coprime_of_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Minimal a b c) : IsCoprime a b := by
apply Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mpr
by_contra hab
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpa, hpb⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp hab
obtain ⟨a1, rfl⟩ := Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpa
obtain ⟨b1, rfl⟩ := Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpb
have hpc : (p : ℤ) ^ 2 ∣ c := by
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, ← h.1.2.2]
apply Dvd.intro (a1 ^ 4 + b1 ^ 4)
ring
obtain ⟨c1, rfl⟩ := hpc
have hf : Fermat42 a1 b1 c1 :=
(Fermat42.mul (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.Prime.ne_zero hp))).mpr h.1
apply Nat.le_lt_asymm (h.2 _ _ _ hf)
rw [Int.natAbs_mul, lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left, Int.natAbs_pow, Int.natAbs_natCast]
· exact Nat.one_lt_pow two_ne_zero (Nat.Prime.one_lt hp)
· exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Int.natAbs_ne_zero.2 (ne_zero hf))
/-- We can swap `a` and `b` in a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2`. -/
theorem minimal_comm {a b c : ℤ} : Minimal a b c → Minimal b a c := fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨Fermat42.comm.mp h1, h2⟩
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has positive `c`. -/
theorem neg_of_minimal {a b c : ℤ} : Minimal a b c → Minimal a b (-c) := by
rintro ⟨⟨ha, hb, heq⟩, h2⟩
constructor
· apply And.intro ha (And.intro hb _)
rw [heq]
exact (neg_sq c).symm
rwa [Int.natAbs_neg c]
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has `a` odd. -/
theorem exists_odd_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) :
∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 ∧ a0 % 2 = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a0, b0, c0, hf⟩ := exists_minimal h
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one a0 with hap | hap
· rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one b0 with hbp | hbp
· exfalso
have h1 : 2 ∣ (Int.gcd a0 b0 : ℤ) :=
Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hap) (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hbp)
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mp (coprime_of_minimal hf)] at h1
revert h1
decide
· exact ⟨b0, ⟨a0, ⟨c0, minimal_comm hf, hbp⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨a0, ⟨b0, ⟨c0, hf, hap⟩⟩⟩
/-- We can assume that a minimal solution to `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2` has
`a` odd and `c` positive. -/
theorem exists_pos_odd_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Fermat42 a b c) :
∃ a0 b0 c0, Minimal a0 b0 c0 ∧ a0 % 2 = 1 ∧ 0 < c0 := by
obtain ⟨a0, b0, c0, hf, hc⟩ := exists_odd_minimal h
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 c0 with (h1 | h1 | h1)
· use a0, b0, c0
· exfalso
exact ne_zero hf.1 h1.symm
· use a0, b0, -c0, neg_of_minimal hf, hc
exact neg_pos.mpr h1
end Fermat42
theorem Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum {r s : ℤ} (h2 : IsCoprime s r) : IsCoprime (r ^ 2 + s ^ 2) r := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact (IsCoprime.mul_left h2 h2).mul_add_left_left r
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias Int.coprime_of_sq_sum := Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum
theorem Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum' {r s : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime r s) :
IsCoprime (r ^ 2 + s ^ 2) (r * s) := by
apply IsCoprime.mul_right (Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum (isCoprime_comm.mp h))
rw [add_comm]; apply Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias Int.coprime_of_sq_sum' := Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum'
namespace Fermat42
-- If we have a solution to a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2, we can construct a smaller one. This
-- implies there can't be a smallest solution.
theorem not_minimal {a b c : ℤ} (h : Minimal a b c) (ha2 : a % 2 = 1) (hc : 0 < c) : False := by
-- Use the fact that a ^ 2, b ^ 2, c form a pythagorean triple to obtain m and n such that
-- a ^ 2 = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2, b ^ 2 = 2 * m * n and c = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2
-- first the formula:
have ht : PythagoreanTriple (a ^ 2) (b ^ 2) c := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
linear_combination h.1.2.2
-- coprime requirement:
have h2 : Int.gcd (a ^ 2) (b ^ 2) = 1 :=
Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mp (coprime_of_minimal h).pow
-- in order to reduce the possibilities we get from the classification of pythagorean triples
-- it helps if we know the parity of a ^ 2 (and the sign of c):
have ha22 : a ^ 2 % 2 = 1 := by
rw [sq, Int.mul_emod, ha2]
decide
obtain ⟨m, n, ht1, ht2, ht3, ht4, ht5, ht6⟩ := ht.coprime_classification' h2 ha22 hc
-- Now a, n, m form a pythagorean triple and so we can obtain r and s such that
-- a = r ^ 2 - s ^ 2, n = 2 * r * s and m = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2
-- formula:
have htt : PythagoreanTriple a n m := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
linear_combination ht1
-- a and n are coprime, because a ^ 2 = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 and m and n are coprime.
have h3 : Int.gcd a n = 1 := by
apply Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mp
apply @IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left _ _ _ a
rw [← sq, ht1, (by ring : m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 = m ^ 2 + -n * n)]
exact (Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mpr ht4).pow_left.add_mul_right_left (-n)
-- m is positive because b is non-zero and b ^ 2 = 2 * m * n and we already have 0 ≤ m.
have hb20 : b ^ 2 ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h.1.2.1
have h4 : 0 < m := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne ht6
rintro rfl
revert hb20
rw [ht2]
simp
obtain ⟨r, s, _, htt2, htt3, htt4, htt5, htt6⟩ := htt.coprime_classification' h3 ha2 h4
-- Now use the fact that (b / 2) ^ 2 = m * r * s, and m, r and s are pairwise coprime to obtain
-- i, j and k such that m = i ^ 2, r = j ^ 2 and s = k ^ 2.
-- m and r * s are coprime because m = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 and r and s are coprime.
have hcp : Int.gcd m (r * s) = 1 := by
rw [htt3]
exact Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mp
(Int.isCoprime_of_sq_sum' (Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mpr htt4))
-- b is even because b ^ 2 = 2 * m * n.
have hb2 : 2 ∣ b := by
apply @Int.Prime.dvd_pow' _ 2 _ Nat.prime_two
rw [ht2, mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right 2 (m * n)
obtain ⟨b', hb2'⟩ := hb2
have hs : b' ^ 2 = m * (r * s) := by
apply (mul_right_inj' (by norm_num : (4 : ℤ) ≠ 0)).mp
linear_combination (-b - 2 * b') * hb2' + ht2 + 2 * m * htt2
have hrsz : r * s ≠ 0 := by
-- because b ^ 2 is not zero and (b / 2) ^ 2 = m * (r * s)
by_contra hrsz
revert hb20
rw [ht2, htt2, mul_assoc, @mul_assoc _ _ _ r s, hrsz]
simp
have h2b0 : b' ≠ 0 := by
apply ne_zero_pow two_ne_zero
rw [hs]
apply mul_ne_zero
· exact ne_of_gt h4
· exact hrsz
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Int.sq_of_gcd_eq_one hcp hs.symm
-- use m is positive to exclude m = - i ^ 2
have hi' : ¬m = -i ^ 2 := by
by_contra h1
have hit : -i ^ 2 ≤ 0 := neg_nonpos.mpr (sq_nonneg i)
rw [← h1] at hit
apply absurd h4 (not_lt.mpr hit)
replace hi : m = i ^ 2 := Or.resolve_right hi hi'
rw [mul_comm] at hs
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hcp
-- obtain d such that r * s = d ^ 2
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := Int.sq_of_gcd_eq_one hcp hs.symm
-- (b / 2) ^ 2 and m are positive so r * s is positive
have hd' : ¬r * s = -d ^ 2 := by
by_contra h1
rw [h1] at hs
have h2 : b' ^ 2 ≤ 0 := by
rw [hs, (by ring : -d ^ 2 * m = -(d ^ 2 * m))]
exact neg_nonpos.mpr ((mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right h4).mpr (sq_nonneg d))
have h2' : 0 ≤ b' ^ 2 := by apply sq_nonneg b'
exact absurd (lt_of_le_of_ne h2' (Ne.symm (pow_ne_zero _ h2b0))) (not_lt.mpr h2)
replace hd : r * s = d ^ 2 := Or.resolve_right hd hd'
-- r = +/- j ^ 2
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := Int.sq_of_gcd_eq_one htt4 hd
have hj0 : j ≠ 0 := by
intro h0
rw [h0, zero_pow two_ne_zero, neg_zero, or_self_iff] at hj
apply left_ne_zero_of_mul hrsz hj
rw [mul_comm] at hd
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at htt4
-- s = +/- k ^ 2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Int.sq_of_gcd_eq_one htt4 hd
have hk0 : k ≠ 0 := by
intro h0
rw [h0, zero_pow two_ne_zero, neg_zero, or_self_iff] at hk
apply right_ne_zero_of_mul hrsz hk
have hj2 : r ^ 2 = j ^ 4 := by
rcases hj with hjp | hjp <;>
· rw [hjp]
ring
have hk2 : s ^ 2 = k ^ 4 := by
rcases hk with hkp | hkp <;>
· rw [hkp]
ring
-- from m = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 we now get a new solution to a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2:
have hh : i ^ 2 = j ^ 4 + k ^ 4 := by rw [← hi, htt3, hj2, hk2]
have hn : n ≠ 0 := by
rw [ht2] at hb20
apply right_ne_zero_of_mul hb20
-- and it has a smaller c: from c = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 we see that m is smaller than c, and i ^ 2 = m.
have hic : Int.natAbs i < Int.natAbs c := by
apply Int.ofNat_lt.mp
rw [← Int.eq_natAbs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hc)]
apply gt_of_gt_of_ge _ (Int.natAbs_le_self_sq i)
rw [← hi, ht3]
apply gt_of_gt_of_ge _ (Int.le_self_sq m)
exact lt_add_of_pos_right (m ^ 2) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hn)
have hic' : Int.natAbs c ≤ Int.natAbs i := by
apply h.2 j k i
exact ⟨hj0, hk0, hh.symm⟩
apply absurd (not_le_of_lt hic) (not_not.mpr hic')
end Fermat42
theorem not_fermat_42 {a b c : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 ≠ c ^ 2 := by
intro h
obtain ⟨a0, b0, c0, ⟨hf, h2, hp⟩⟩ :=
Fermat42.exists_pos_odd_minimal (And.intro ha (And.intro hb h))
apply Fermat42.not_minimal hf h2 hp
/--
Fermat's Last Theorem for $n=4$: if `a b c : ℕ` are all non-zero
then `a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 ≠ c ^ 4`.
-/
| theorem fermatLastTheoremFour : FermatLastTheoremFor 4 := by
rw [fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_int]
intro a b c ha hb _ heq
apply @not_fermat_42 _ _ (c ^ 2) ha hb
rw [heq]; ring
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Four.lean | 298 | 302 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
div_lt_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
div_le_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
div_le_div₀ hc hac hd hbd
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀ hac hbd c0 d0
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀' (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀' hac hbd c0 d0
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
@[bound]
theorem div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_pos_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha hb₀ hb₁
theorem one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [le_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [div_le_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_comm₀ ha hb
theorem one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_comm₀ ha hb
theorem le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_comm₀ ha hb
theorem lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_comm₀ ha hb
@[bound] lemma Bound.one_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : b < a → 1 < a / b := (one_lt_div b0).mpr
@[bound] lemma Bound.div_lt_one_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : a < b → a / b < 1 := (div_lt_one b0).mpr
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using inv_anti₀ ha h
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
theorem le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
theorem lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
theorem one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
theorem one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [le_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
theorem half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
div_pos h zero_lt_two
theorem one_half_pos : (0 : α) < 1 / 2 :=
half_pos zero_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem half_le_self_iff : a / 2 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rw [div_le_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
@[simp]
theorem half_lt_self_iff : a / 2 < a ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
alias ⟨_, half_le_self⟩ := half_le_self_iff
alias ⟨_, half_lt_self⟩ := half_lt_self_iff
alias div_two_lt_of_pos := half_lt_self
theorem one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 :=
half_lt_self zero_lt_one
theorem two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 :=
(one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
theorem left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_thirds (a : α) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_add_div_same, div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, ← add_one_mul 2 a, two_add_one_eq_three,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ a three_ne_zero]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left ha, inv_pos]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_right (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right (inv_pos.2 hb)]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff₀ hc]
theorem div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
theorem exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a := by
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1 := div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inr zero_lt_one))
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, ?_⟩
rw [← lt_div_iff₀ this, div_div_cancel₀ h.ne']
exact lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| lt_add_one _)
theorem exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b;
⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff₀ hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone_div_right_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hbc ha
lemma strictMono_div_right_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : StrictMono (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_lt_div_of_pos_right hbc ha
theorem Monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 ≤ c) : Monotone fun x => f x / c := (monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).comp hf
theorem StrictMono.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : StrictMono f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 < c) : StrictMono fun x => f x / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedSemiField.toDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered α where
dense a₁ a₂ h :=
⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc
a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 := (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
_ < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_left h _) zero_lt_two
,
calc
(a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_right h _) zero_lt_two
_ = a₂ := add_self_div_two a₂
⟩
theorem min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_min.symm
theorem max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_max.symm
theorem one_div_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => 1 / x) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ x1 _ y1 xy => (one_div_lt_one_div (Set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (Set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
theorem one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_lt_one_div ?_ ?_).2 (pow_lt_pow_right₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
theorem one_div_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
theorem inv_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ hy xy =>
(inv_lt_inv₀ hy hx).2 xy
theorem inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
theorem inv_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
| theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_le_mul₀ {α : Type*}
[Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a ≤ b * ε := by
refine ⟨fun h _ hε ↦ h.trans <| le_mul_of_one_le_right hb hε.le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 272 | 275 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
· intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
apply AnalyticOn.comp _ _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
· exact ContinuousLinearEquiv.analyticOn _ _
· exact (h'p i).comp (g.analyticOn _) (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
((((hf.of_le hi).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap
g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl h's hx).symm
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear equiv. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
fderivWithin 𝕜
(ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft _ (fun _x : Fin i => g) ∘
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s ∘ g)) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
rw [this, ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx),
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', coe_coe, comp_apply, tail_def, tail_def]
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G →L[𝕜] E) {f : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : G) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x =
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ _) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)‖ := by
have : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f hs hx i
rw [this, ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F) (x : G)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ (g x)) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
constructor
· intro H
simpa [← preimage_comp, Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
· intro H
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H
exact H.comp_continuousLinearMap _
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffOn_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨fun H => by simpa [Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G),
fun H => H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e : G →L[𝕜] E)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ, ← contDiffOn_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffOn_comp_iff
end linear
/-! ### The Cartesian product of two C^n functions is C^n. -/
section prod
/-- If two functions `f` and `g` admit Taylor series `p` and `q` in a set `s`, then the cartesian
product of `f` and `g` admits the cartesian product of `p` and `q` as a Taylor series. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prodMk {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) {g : E → G}
{q : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E G} (hg : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n g q s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (fun y => (f y, g y)) (fun y k => (p y k).prod (q y k)) s := by
set L := fun m => ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin m => E) F G
constructor
· intro x hx; rw [← hf.zero_eq x hx, ← hg.zero_eq x hx]; rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (L m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx).prodMk (hg.fderivWithin m hm x hx))
· intro m hm
exact (L m).continuous.comp_continuousOn ((hf.cont m hm).prodMk (hg.cont m hm))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prod := HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point in a domain is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.prodMk {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨v, hv, q, hq, h'q⟩ := hg
refine ⟨u ∩ v, Filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono inter_subset_left).prodMk (hq.mono inter_subset_right), fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL _ _ _ _ (p x i, q x i)) (u ∩ v)
apply (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _).comp_analyticOn _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ((h'p i).mono inter_subset_left).prod ((h'q i).mono inter_subset_right)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩
exact ⟨u ∩ v, Filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono inter_subset_left).prodMk (hq.mono inter_subset_right)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.prod := ContDiffWithinAt.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.prodMk {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffOn.prod := ContDiffOn.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.prodMk {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) x :=
contDiffWithinAt_univ.1 <| hf.contDiffWithinAt.prodMk hg.contDiffWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffAt.prod := ContDiffAt.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.prodMk {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E => (f x, g x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| hf.contDiffOn.prodMk hg.contDiffOn
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiff.prod := ContDiff.prodMk
end prod
section comp
/-!
### Composition of `C^n` functions
We show that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. One way to do this would be to
use the following simple inductive proof. Assume it is done for `n`.
Then, to check it for `n+1`, one needs to check that the derivative of `g ∘ f` is `C^n`, i.e.,
that `Dg(f x) ⬝ Df(x)` is `C^n`. The term `Dg (f x)` is the composition of two `C^n` functions, so
it is `C^n` by the inductive assumption. The term `Df(x)` is also `C^n`. Then, the matrix
multiplication is the application of a bilinear map (which is `C^∞`, and therefore `C^n`) to
`x ↦ (Dg(f x), Df x)`. As the composition of two `C^n` maps, it is again `C^n`, and we are done.
There are two difficulties in this proof.
The first one is that it is an induction over all Banach
spaces. In Lean, this is only possible if they belong to a fixed universe. One could formalize this
by first proving the statement in this case, and then extending the result to general universes
by embedding all the spaces we consider in a common universe through `ULift`.
The second one is that it does not work cleanly for analytic maps: for this case, we need to
exhibit a whole sequence of derivatives which are all analytic, not just finitely many of them, so
an induction is never enough at a finite step.
Both these difficulties can be overcome with some cost. However, we choose a different path: we
write down an explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of `g ∘ f` in terms of derivatives of
`g` and `f` (this is the formula of Faa-Di Bruno) and use this formula to get a suitable Taylor
expansion for `g ∘ f`. Writing down the formula of Faa-Di Bruno is not easy as the formula is quite
intricate, but it is also useful for other purposes and once available it makes the proof here
essentially trivial.
-/
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (st : MapsTo f s t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
have h'f : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x := hf
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h'f
obtain ⟨v, hv, q, hq, h'q⟩ := hg
let w := insert x s ∩ (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := fun y hy => hy.2.2
have wu : w ⊆ u := fun y hy => hy.2.1
refine ⟨w, ?_, fun y ↦ (q (f y)).taylorComp (p y), hq.comp (hp.mono wu) wv, ?_⟩
· apply inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem hu ?_)
apply (continuousWithinAt_insert_self.2 hf.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ hv
simp only [image_insert_eq]
apply insert_subset_insert
exact image_subset_iff.mpr st
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f w := by
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f y)) w :=
((h'p 0).mono wu).congr fun y hy ↦ (hp.zero_eq' (wu hy)).symm
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F)
((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f y))) w :=
AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _ ) this
(mapsTo_univ _ _)
simpa using this
exact analyticOn_taylorComp h'q (fun n ↦ (h'p n).mono wu) this wv
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩
let w := insert x s ∩ (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := fun y hy => hy.2.2
have wu : w ⊆ u := fun y hy => hy.2.1
refine ⟨w, ?_, fun y ↦ (q (f y)).taylorComp (p y), hq.comp (hp.mono wu) wv⟩
apply inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem hu ?_)
apply (continuousWithinAt_insert_self.2 hf.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ hv
simp only [image_insert_eq]
apply insert_subset_insert
exact image_subset_iff.mpr st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (st : MapsTo f s t) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx ↦ ContDiffWithinAt.comp x (hg (f x) (st hx)) (hf x hx) st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_inter
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias ContDiffOn.comp' := ContDiffOn.comp_inter
/-- The composition of a `C^n` function on a domain with a `C^n` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
(contDiffOn_univ.2 hg).comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_contDiff {s : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : ContDiff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ] at *
exact hg.comp hf fun x _ => hs x
theorem ContDiffOn.image_comp_contDiff {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g (f '' s)) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.comp hf.contDiffOn (s.mapsTo_image f)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp (contDiffOn_univ.2 hg) (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) (subset_univ _)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_eq {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (st : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp x hf st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hs).comp x hf (subset_preimage_image f s)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image_of_eq
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image x hf hs
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_inter {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_inter_of_eq {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F}
(x : E) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_inter x hf
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.comp_inter x hf).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin hs)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin_of_eq
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin x hf hs
theorem ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x))
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt_of_eq {y : F} (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g y)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points is `C^n`. -/
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.comp (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x)) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffWithinAt {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) t x :=
haveI : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g univ (f x) := h.contDiffAt.contDiffWithinAt
this.comp x hf (subset_univ _)
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffAt {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt hf
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_of_eventually_mem {t : Set F}
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hxs : x ∈ s) (hst : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, f y ∈ t)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x) i := by
obtain ⟨u, hxu, huo, hfu, hgu⟩ : ∃ u, x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u ∧
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) (s ∩ u) ∧
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i g (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t) (f '' (s ∩ u)) := by
have hxt : f x ∈ t := hst.self_of_nhdsWithin hxs
have hf_tendsto : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] (f x)) :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff.mpr ⟨hf.continuousWithinAt, hst⟩
have H₁ : ∀ᶠ u in (𝓝[s] x).smallSets,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) u :=
hf.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn hs hxs hi
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ u in (𝓝[s] x).smallSets,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i g (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t) (f '' u) :=
hf_tendsto.image_smallSets.eventually (hg.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ht hxt hi)
rcases (nhdsWithin_basis_open _ _).smallSets.eventually_iff.mp (H₁.and H₂)
with ⟨u, ⟨hxu, huo⟩, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, hxu, huo, hu (by simp [inter_comm])⟩
exact .symm <| (hgu.comp hfu (mapsTo_image _ _)).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl
(hs.inter huo) ⟨hxs, hxu⟩ |>.trans <| iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open huo hxu
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_comp {t : Set F} (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x))
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hst : MapsTo f s t) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x) i :=
iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_of_eventually_mem hg hf ht hs hx (eventually_mem_nhdsWithin.mono hst) hi
theorem iteratedFDeriv_comp (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x)) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x =
(ftaylorSeries 𝕜 g (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeries 𝕜 f x) i := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← ftaylorSeriesWithin_univ]
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_comp hg.contDiffWithinAt hf.contDiffWithinAt
uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ _) (mapsTo_univ _ _) hi
end comp
/-!
### Smoothness of projections
-/
/-- The first projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_fst : ContDiff 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff IsBoundedLinearMap.fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.fst {f : E → F × G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).1 :=
contDiff_fst.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.fst' {f : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E × F => f x.1 :=
hf.comp contDiff_fst
/-- The first projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fst {s : Set (E × F)} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) s :=
ContDiff.contDiffOn contDiff_fst
theorem ContDiffOn.fst {f : E → F × G} {s : Set E} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).1) s :=
contDiff_fst.comp_contDiffOn hf
/-- The first projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_fst {p : E × F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) p :=
contDiff_fst.contDiffAt
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).1) x :=
contDiffAt_fst.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst' {f : E → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.1) (x, y) :=
ContDiffAt.comp (x, y) hf contDiffAt_fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst'' {f : E → G} {x : E × F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x.1) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.1) x :=
hf.comp x contDiffAt_fst
/-- The first projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_fst {s : Set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) s p :=
contDiff_fst.contDiffWithinAt
/-- The second projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_snd : ContDiff 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff IsBoundedLinearMap.snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.snd {f : E → F × G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).2 :=
contDiff_snd.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.snd' {f : F → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E × F => f x.2 :=
hf.comp contDiff_snd
/-- The second projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_snd {s : Set (E × F)} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) s :=
ContDiff.contDiffOn contDiff_snd
theorem ContDiffOn.snd {f : E → F × G} {s : Set E} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).2) s :=
contDiff_snd.comp_contDiffOn hf
/-- The second projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_snd {p : E × F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) p :=
contDiff_snd.contDiffAt
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).2) x :=
contDiffAt_snd.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd' {f : F → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f y) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.2) (x, y) :=
ContDiffAt.comp (x, y) hf contDiffAt_snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd'' {f : F → G} {x : E × F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x.2) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.2) x :=
hf.comp x contDiffAt_snd
/-- The second projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_snd {s : Set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) s p :=
contDiff_snd.contDiffWithinAt
section NAry
variable {E₁ E₂ E₃ : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E₁] [NormedAddCommGroup E₂] [NormedAddCommGroup E₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E₃]
theorem ContDiff.comp₂ {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf₁ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
hg.comp <| hf₁.prodMk hf₂
theorem ContDiffAt.comp₂ {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {x : F}
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f₁ x, f₂ x))
(hf₁ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₁ x) (hf₂ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₂ x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
hg.comp x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
theorem ContDiffAt.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂}
{s : Set F} {x : F} (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f₁ x, f₂ x))
(hf₁ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x) (hf₂ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₂ s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt₂ := ContDiffAt.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {x : F}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₁ x) (hf₂ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₂ x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
hg.contDiffAt.comp₂ hf₁ hf₂
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffAt₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂}
{s : Set F} {x : F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf₁ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x) (hf₂ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₂ s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
hg.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffWithinAt₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {s : Set F}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s) (hf₂ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s :=
hg.comp_contDiffOn <| hf₁.prodMk hf₂
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn
theorem ContDiff.comp₃ {g : E₁ × E₂ × E₃ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {f₃ : F → E₃}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) (hf₃ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₃) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x) :=
hg.comp₂ hf₁ <| hf₂.prodMk hf₃
theorem ContDiff.comp₃_contDiffOn {g : E₁ × E₂ × E₃ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {f₃ : F → E₃}
{s : Set F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s) (hf₂ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s)
(hf₃ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₃ s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x)) s :=
hg.comp₂_contDiffOn hf₁ <| hf₂.prodMk hf₃
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn₃ := ContDiff.comp₃_contDiffOn
end NAry
section SpecificBilinearMaps
theorem ContDiff.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (g x).comp (f x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.contDiff.comp₂ (g := fun p => p.1.comp p.2) hg hf
theorem ContDiffOn.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set X}
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) s :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (F := F) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hg hf
theorem ContDiffAt.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {x : X}
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hg hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set X} {x : X}
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hg hf
theorem ContDiff.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x) (g x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂ hf hg
theorem ContDiffOn.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) s :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hf hg
theorem ContDiffAt.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) x :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hf hg
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) s x :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hf hg
theorem ContDiff.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight.contDiff.comp₂ (g := fun p => p.1.smulRight p.2) hf hg
theorem ContDiffOn.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) s :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hf hg
theorem ContDiffAt.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hf hg
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hf hg
end SpecificBilinearMaps
section ClmApplyConst
/-- Application of a `ContinuousLinearMap` to a constant commutes with `iteratedFDerivWithin`. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_clm_apply_const_apply
{s : Set E} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {c : E → F →L[𝕜] G}
(hc : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n c s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) {u : F} {m : Fin i → E} :
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x) m = (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i c s x) m u := by
induction i generalizing x with
| zero => simp
| succ i ih =>
replace hi : (i : WithTop ℕ∞) < n := lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_cast; simp) hi
have h_deriv_apply : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s) s :=
(hc.clm_apply contDiffOn_const).differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hi hs
have h_deriv : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i c s) s :=
hc.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hi hs
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
rw [← fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv_apply x hx)]
rw [fderivWithin_congr' (fun x hx ↦ ih hi.le hx) hx]
rw [fderivWithin_clm_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv.continuousMultilinear_apply_const _ x hx)
(differentiableWithinAt_const u)]
rw [fderivWithin_const_apply]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero, zero_add]
rw [fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv x hx)]
/-- Application of a `ContinuousLinearMap` to a constant commutes with `iteratedFDeriv`. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_clm_apply_const_apply
{c : E → F →L[𝕜] G} (hc : ContDiff 𝕜 n c)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) {x : E} {u : F} {m : Fin i → E} :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) m = (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i c x) m u := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_clm_apply_const_apply uniqueDiffOn_univ hc.contDiffOn hi (mem_univ _)
end ClmApplyConst
/-- The natural equivalence `(E × F) × G ≃ E × (F × G)` is smooth.
Warning: if you think you need this lemma, it is likely that you can simplify your proof by
reformulating the lemma that you're applying next using the tips in
Note [continuity lemma statement]
-/
theorem contDiff_prodAssoc {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| Equiv.prodAssoc E F G :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.prodAssoc 𝕜 E F G).contDiff
/-- The natural equivalence `E × (F × G) ≃ (E × F) × G` is smooth.
Warning: see remarks attached to `contDiff_prodAssoc`
-/
theorem contDiff_prodAssoc_symm {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| (Equiv.prodAssoc E F G).symm :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.prodAssoc 𝕜 E F G).symm.contDiff
/-! ### Bundled derivatives are smooth -/
section bundled
/-- One direction of `contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt`, but where all derivatives are
taken within the same set. Version for partial derivatives / functions with parameters. If `f x` is
a `C^n+1` family of functions and `g x` is a `C^n` family of points, then the derivative of `f x` at
`g x` depends in a `C^n` way on `x`. We give a general version of this fact relative to sets which
may not have unique derivatives, in the following form. If `f : E × F → G` is `C^n+1` at
`(x₀, g(x₀))` in `(s ∪ {x₀}) × t ⊆ E × F` and `g : E → F` is `C^n` at `x₀` within some set `s ⊆ E`,
then there is a function `f' : E → F →L[𝕜] G` that is `C^n` at `x₀` within `s` such that for all `x`
sufficiently close to `x₀` within `s ∪ {x₀}` the function `y ↦ f x y` has derivative `f' x` at `g x`
within `t ⊆ F`. For convenience, we return an explicit set of `x`'s where this holds that is a
subset of `s ∪ {x₀}`. We need one additional condition, namely that `t` is a neighborhood of
`g(x₀)` within `g '' s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F} (hn : n ≠ ∞)
{x₀ : E} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) (uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x₀) (hgt : t ∈ 𝓝[g '' s] g x₀) :
∃ v ∈ 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, v ⊆ insert x₀ s ∧ ∃ f' : E → F →L[𝕜] G,
(∀ x ∈ v, HasFDerivWithinAt (f x) (f' x) t (g x)) ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => f' x) s x₀ := by
have hst : insert x₀ s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝[(fun x => (x, g x)) '' s] (x₀, g x₀) := by
refine nhdsWithin_mono _ ?_ (nhdsWithin_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin hgt)
simp_rw [image_subset_iff, mk_preimage_prod, preimage_id', subset_inter_iff, subset_insert,
true_and, subset_preimage_image]
obtain ⟨v, hv, hvs, f_an, f', hvf', hf'⟩ :=
(contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt' hn).mp hf
refine
⟨(fun z => (z, g z)) ⁻¹' v ∩ insert x₀ s, ?_, inter_subset_right, fun z =>
(f' (z, g z)).comp (ContinuousLinearMap.inr 𝕜 E F), ?_, ?_⟩
· refine inter_mem ?_ self_mem_nhdsWithin
have := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) hv
refine mem_nhdsWithin_insert.mpr ⟨this, ?_⟩
refine (continuousWithinAt_id.prodMk hg.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' ?_
rw [← nhdsWithin_le_iff] at hst hv ⊢
exact (hst.trans <| nhdsWithin_mono _ <| subset_insert _ _).trans hv
· intro z hz
have := hvf' (z, g z) hz.1
refine this.comp _ (hasFDerivAt_prodMk_right _ _).hasFDerivWithinAt ?_
exact mapsTo'.mpr (image_prodMk_subset_prod_right hz.2)
· exact (hf'.continuousLinearMap_comp <| (ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 F (E × F) G).flip
(ContinuousLinearMap.inr 𝕜 E F)).comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image x₀
(contDiffWithinAt_id.prodMk hg) hst
/-- The most general lemma stating that `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)` is `C^n`
at a point within a set.
To show that `x ↦ D_yf(x,y)g(x)` (taken within `t`) is `C^m` at `x₀` within `s`, we require that
* `f` is `C^n` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` within `(s ∪ {x₀}) × t` for `n ≥ m+1`.
* `g` is `C^m` at `x₀` within `s`;
* Derivatives are unique at `g(x)` within `t` for `x` sufficiently close to `x₀` within `s ∪ {x₀}`;
* `t` is a neighborhood of `g(x₀)` within `g '' s`; -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin'' {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀)
(ht : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t (g x)) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n)
(hgt : t ∈ 𝓝[g '' s] g x₀) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
have : ∀ k : ℕ, k ≤ m → ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 k (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
intro k hkm
obtain ⟨v, hv, -, f', hvf', hf'⟩ :=
(hf.of_le <| (add_le_add_right hkm 1).trans hmn).hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds (by simp)
(hg.of_le hkm) hgt
refine hf'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert ?_
filter_upwards [hv, ht]
exact fun y hy h2y => (hvf' y hy).fderivWithin h2y
match m with
| ω =>
obtain rfl : n = ω := by simpa using hmn
obtain ⟨v, hv, -, f', hvf', hf'⟩ := hf.hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds (by simp) hg hgt
refine hf'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert ?_
filter_upwards [hv, ht]
exact fun y hy h2y => (hvf' y hy).fderivWithin h2y
| ∞ =>
rw [contDiffWithinAt_infty]
exact fun k ↦ this k (by exact_mod_cast le_top)
| (m : ℕ) => exact this _ le_rfl
/-- A special case of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin''` where we require that `s ⊆ g⁻¹(t)`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin' {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀)
(ht : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t (g x)) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n)
(hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ :=
hf.fderivWithin'' hg ht hmn <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin <| image_subset_iff.mpr hst
/-- A special case of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin'` where we require that `x₀ ∈ s` and there
are unique derivatives everywhere within `t`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s)
(hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
rw [← insert_eq_self.mpr hx₀] at hf
refine hf.fderivWithin' hg ?_ hmn hst
rw [insert_eq_self.mpr hx₀]
exact eventually_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin fun x hx => ht _ (hst hx)
/-- `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x) (k x)` is smooth at a point within a set. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_apply {f : E → F → G} {g k : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀) (hk : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m k s x₀) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x) (k x)) s x₀ :=
(contDiff_fst.clm_apply contDiff_snd).contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x₀
((hf.fderivWithin hg ht hmn hx₀ hst).prodMk hk)
/-- `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s` is smooth at `x₀` within `s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x₀ :=
ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin
(ContDiffWithinAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffWithinAt_snd <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s s)
contDiffWithinAt_id hs hmn hx₀s (by rw [preimage_id'])
/-- `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x (k x)` is smooth at `x₀` within `s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right_apply
{f : F → G} {k : F → F} {s : Set F} {x₀ : F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀) (hk : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m k s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x (k x)) s x₀ :=
ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_apply
(ContDiffWithinAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffWithinAt_snd <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s s)
contDiffWithinAt_id hk hs hmn hx₀s (by rw [preimage_id'])
-- TODO: can we make a version of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin` for iterated derivatives?
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFDerivWithin_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + i ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x₀ := by
induction' i with i hi generalizing m
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, add_zero] at hmn
exact (hf.of_le hmn).continuousLinearMap_comp
((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm : _ →L[𝕜] E [×0]→L[𝕜] F)
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_comm _ 1, ← add_assoc] at hmn
exact ((hi hmn).fderivWithin_right hs le_rfl hx₀s).continuousLinearMap_comp
((continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin (i+1) ↦ E) F).symm :
_ →L[𝕜] E [×(i+1)]→L[𝕜] F)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-15")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFderivWithin_right := ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFDerivWithin_right
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is smooth at `x₀`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffAt.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (x₀, g x₀)) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m g x₀)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)) x₀ := by
simp_rw [← fderivWithin_univ]
refine (ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin hf.contDiffWithinAt hg.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ
hmn (mem_univ x₀) ?_).contDiffAt univ_mem
rw [preimage_univ]
/-- `fderiv 𝕜 f` is smooth at `x₀`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fderiv_right (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x₀) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (fderiv 𝕜 f) x₀ :=
ContDiffAt.fderiv (ContDiffAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffAt_snd) contDiffAt_id hmn
theorem ContDiffAt.iteratedFDeriv_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x₀)
(hmn : m + i ≤ n) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f) x₀ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hf.iteratedFDerivWithin_right uniqueDiffOn_univ hmn trivial
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is smooth. -/
protected theorem ContDiff.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 m <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hnm : n + 1 ≤ m) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _ => hf.contDiffAt.fderiv hg.contDiffAt hnm
/-- `fderiv 𝕜 f` is smooth. -/
theorem ContDiff.fderiv_right (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiff 𝕜 m (fderiv 𝕜 f) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _x => hf.contDiffAt.fderiv_right hmn
theorem ContDiff.iteratedFDeriv_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hmn : m + i ≤ n) : ContDiff 𝕜 m (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _x => hf.contDiffAt.iteratedFDeriv_right hmn
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is continuous. -/
theorem Continuous.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : Continuous g) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
Continuous fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) :=
(hf.fderiv (contDiff_zero.mpr hg) hn).continuous
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) (k x)` is smooth. -/
theorem ContDiff.fderiv_apply {f : E → F → G} {g k : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 m <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hk : ContDiff 𝕜 n k)
(hnm : n + 1 ≤ m) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) (k x) :=
(hf.fderiv hg hnm).clm_apply hk
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply {s : Set E} {f : E → F} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (fun p : E × E => (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2) (s ×ˢ univ) :=
((hf.fderivWithin hs hmn).comp contDiffOn_fst (prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _)).clm_apply
contDiffOn_snd
/-- If a function is at least `C^1`, its bundled derivative (mapping `(x, v)` to `Df(x) v`) is
continuous. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_fderivWithin_apply (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
ContinuousOn (fun p : E × E => (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s p.1 : E → F) p.2) (s ×ˢ univ) :=
(contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply (m := 0) hf hs hn).continuousOn
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.contDiff_fderiv_apply {f : E → F} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiff 𝕜 m fun p : E × E => (fderiv 𝕜 f p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2 := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ] at hf ⊢
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← univ_prod_univ]
exact contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply hf uniqueDiffOn_univ hmn
end bundled
section deriv
/-!
### One dimension
All results up to now have been expressed in terms of the general Fréchet derivative `fderiv`. For
maps defined on the field, the one-dimensional derivative `deriv` is often easier to use. In this
paragraph, we reformulate some higher smoothness results in terms of `deriv`.
-/
variable {f₂ : 𝕜 → F} {s₂ : Set 𝕜}
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `derivWithin`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ s₂ ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs, and_congr_right_iff]
intro _
constructor
· rintro ⟨h', h⟩
refine ⟨h', ?_⟩
have : derivWithin f₂ s₂ = (fun u : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F => u 1) ∘ fderivWithin 𝕜 f₂ s₂ := by
ext x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
apply ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn _ h
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.isBoundedLinearMap_left _).contDiff
· rintro ⟨h', h⟩
refine ⟨h', ?_⟩
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 f₂ s₂ = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) ∘ derivWithin f₂ s₂ := by
ext x; simp [derivWithin]
simp only [this]
apply ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn _ h
have : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 fun _ : (𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) × F => _ := isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight
exact (this.isBoundedLinearMap_right _).contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_derivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [show ∞ = ∞ + 1 by rfl, contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_derivWithin := contDiffOn_infty_iff_derivWithin
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on an open domain if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ s₂ ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn]
exact Iff.rfl.and (Iff.rfl.and (contDiffOn_congr fun _ => derivWithin_of_isOpen hs))
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_deriv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [show ∞ = ∞ + 1 by rfl, contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_deriv_of_isOpen := contDiffOn_infty_iff_deriv_of_isOpen
protected theorem ContDiffOn.derivWithin (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
((contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs).1 (hf.of_le hmn)).2.2
theorem ContDiffOn.deriv_of_isOpen (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : IsOpen s₂) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
(hf.derivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn hmn).congr fun _ hx => (derivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx).symm
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_derivWithin (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact ((contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuousOn
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_deriv_of_isOpen (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : IsOpen s₂)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact ((contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuousOn
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_succ_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ univ) ∧
ContDiff 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen, isOpen_univ,
differentiableOn_univ]
theorem contDiff_one_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 1 f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ Continuous (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl, contDiff_succ_iff_deriv]
simp
theorem contDiff_infty_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (∞ : WithTop ℕ∞) = ∞ + 1 from rfl, contDiff_succ_iff_deriv]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")] alias contDiff_top_iff_deriv := contDiff_infty_iff_deriv
theorem ContDiff.continuous_deriv (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : Continuous (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact (contDiff_succ_iff_deriv.mp (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuous
theorem ContDiff.iterate_deriv :
∀ (n : ℕ) {f₂ : 𝕜 → F}, ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ f₂ → ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ (deriv^[n] f₂)
| 0, _, hf => hf
| n + 1, _, hf => ContDiff.iterate_deriv n (contDiff_infty_iff_deriv.mp hf).2
theorem ContDiff.iterate_deriv' (n : ℕ) :
∀ (k : ℕ) {f₂ : 𝕜 → F}, ContDiff 𝕜 (n + k : ℕ) f₂ → ContDiff 𝕜 n (deriv^[k] f₂)
| 0, _, hf => hf
| k + 1, _, hf => ContDiff.iterate_deriv' _ k (contDiff_succ_iff_deriv.mp hf).2.2
end deriv
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 1,599 | 1,601 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
| variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 583 | 588 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
/-!
# Pullbacks and pushouts in the category of topological spaces
-/
open TopologicalSpace Topology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
/-- The first projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
/-- The second projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
/-- The explicit pullback cone of `X, Y` given by `{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }`. -/
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
simpa)
/-- The constructed cone is a limit. -/
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact ofHom
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop }
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· intro m h₁ h₂
ext x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be `ext x`.
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
/-- The pullback of two maps can be identified as a subspace of `X × Y`. -/
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.fst f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.snd f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ↑(pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨pullback.fst f g x, pullback.snd f g x⟩, by
simpa using CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst f g) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd f g) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.isInducing.eq_induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;>
-- This used to be `simp` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
aesop_cat
/-- The pullback along an embedding is (isomorphic to) the preimage. -/
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : IsEmbedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.injective
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_subtype_val.prodMk <| hg.isInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem isInducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsInducing <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨by simp [prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_pullback_to_prod := isInducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsEmbedding <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨isInducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_pullback_to_prod := isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod
/-- If the map `S ⟶ T` is mono, then there is a description of the image of `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`. -/
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩ (pullback.snd g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₁, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₂,
ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂,
← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, pullback.condition, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
| rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
· simp [hx₁, ← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl]
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 200 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| compl u hu ihu =>
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at ihu ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← ihu,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at ihf ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, ihf]
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
open scoped Interval in
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
open scoped Interval in
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
-- note that we cannot use `ae_restrict_iff` since we do not require measurability
refine hfg.filter_mono ?_
rw [Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous]
exact Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
(ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 (Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _ => id)
theorem ae_restrict_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
ae_restrict_mem₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_restrict_of_forall_mem {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
(ae_restrict_mem hs).mono h
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self)
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset {s t : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono <| Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ))
theorem ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl (t : Set α) {p : α → Prop}
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) (htc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict tᶜ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <|
calc
μ { x | ¬p x } ≤ μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ t) + μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ tᶜ) :=
measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict t { x | ¬p x } + μ.restrict tᶜ { x | ¬p x } :=
add_le_add (le_restrict_apply _ _) (le_restrict_apply _ _)
_ = 0 := by rw [ae_iff.1 ht, ae_iff.1 htc, zero_add]
theorem mem_map_restrict_ae_iff {β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map f (ae (μ.restrict s)) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply' hs]
theorem ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_comp' {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') (h2 : μ.map f ≪ ν) : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).mono_right h2.ae_le h
theorem Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf.aemeasurable h hf.absolutelyContinuous
theorem ae_eq_comp {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : g =ᵐ[μ.map f] g') :
g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf h AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ae_eq_one {β} [Group β] (f g : α → β) : f / g =ᵐ[μ] 1 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one] at hx
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive sub_nonneg_ae]
lemma one_le_div_ae {β : Type*} [Group β] [LE β] [MulRightMono β] (f g : α → β) :
1 ≤ᵐ[μ] g / f ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div'] at ha
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div']
theorem le_ae_restrict : ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ ae (μ.restrict s) := fun _s hs =>
eventually_inf_principal.2 (ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hs)
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ae (μ.restrict s) = ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext t
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_setOf,
Classical.not_imp, fun a => and_comm (a := a ∈ s) (b := ¬a ∈ t)]
rfl
lemma ae_restrict_le : ae (μ.restrict s) ≤ ae μ :=
ae_mono restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : ae (μ.restrict s) = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans restrict_eq_zero
theorem ae_restrict_neBot {s} : (ae <| μ.restrict s).NeBot ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans ae_restrict_eq_bot.not
theorem self_mem_ae_restrict {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (μ.restrict s) := by
simp only [ae_restrict_eq hs, exists_prop, mem_principal, mem_inf_iff]
exact ⟨_, univ_mem, s, Subset.rfl, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_congr_set {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x :=
⟨ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst, ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst.symm⟩
lemma NullMeasurable.measure_preimage_eq_measure_restrict_preimage_of_ae_compl_eq_const
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {b : β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(f_mble : NullMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hs : f =ᵐ[Measure.restrict μ sᶜ] (fun _ ↦ b))
{t : Set β} (t_mble : MeasurableSet t) (ht : b ∉ t) :
μ (f ⁻¹' t) = μ.restrict s (f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀ (f_mble t_mble)]
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply₀] at hs
· apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono inter_subset_left)
apply (measure_mono (Eq.symm (inter_union_compl (f ⁻¹' t) s)).le).trans
apply (measure_union_le _ _).trans
have obs : μ ((f ⁻¹' t) ∩ sᶜ) = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← hs]
apply measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ _)
intro x hx hfx
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_setOf_eq] at hx hfx
exact ht (hfx ▸ hx)
simp only [obs, add_zero, le_refl]
· exact NullMeasurableSet.of_null hs
namespace Measure
section Subtype
/-! ### Subtype of a measure space -/
section ComapAnyMeasure
theorem MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ := by
rw [Subtype.instMeasurableSpace, comap_eq_generateFrom] at ht
induction t, ht using generateFrom_induction with
| hC t' ht' =>
obtain ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩ := ht'
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter (hs'.nullMeasurableSet)
| empty => simp only [image_empty, nullMeasurableSet_empty]
| compl t' _ ht' =>
simp only [← range_diff_image Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
exact hs.diff ht'
| iUnion f _ hf =>
dsimp only []
rw [image_iUnion]
exact .iUnion hf
theorem NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.comap Subtype.val)) : NullMeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) μ :=
NullMeasurableSet.image _ μ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun _ => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) ht
theorem measure_subtype_coe_le_comap (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set s) :
μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) ≤ μ.comap Subtype.val t :=
le_comap_apply _ _ Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) _
theorem measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) {t : Set s}
(ht : μ.comap Subtype.val t = 0) : μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| (measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hs t).trans ht.le
end ComapAnyMeasure
section MeasureSpace
variable {u : Set δ} [MeasureSpace δ] {p : δ → Prop}
/-- In a measure space, one can restrict the measure to a subtype to get a new measure space.
Not registered as an instance, as there are other natural choices such as the normalized restriction
for a probability measure, or the subspace measure when restricting to a vector subspace. Enable
locally if needed with `attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace`. -/
noncomputable def Subtype.measureSpace : MeasureSpace (Subtype p) where
volume := Measure.comap Subtype.val volume
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem Subtype.volume_def : (volume : Measure u) = volume.comap Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem Subtype.volume_univ (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) : volume (univ : Set u) = volume u := by
rw [Subtype.volume_def, comap_apply₀ _ _ _ _ MeasurableSet.univ.nullMeasurableSet]
· congr
simp only [image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
· exact fun t => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hu
theorem volume_subtype_coe_le_volume (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) (t : Set u) :
volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) ≤ volume t :=
measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hu t
theorem volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) {t : Set u}
(ht : volume t = 0) : volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) = 0 :=
measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero hu ht
end MeasureSpace
end Subtype
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory Measure
namespace MeasurableEmbedding
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m1 : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
section
variable (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
include hf
theorem map_comap (μ : Measure β) : (comap f μ).map f = μ.restrict (range f) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [hf.map_apply, comap_apply f hf.injective hf.measurableSet_image' _ (hf.measurable ht),
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
theorem comap_apply (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
calc
comap f μ s = comap f μ (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := by rw [hf.injective.preimage_image]
_ = (comap f μ).map f (f '' s) := (hf.map_apply _ _).symm
_ = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset_range _ _)]
theorem comap_map (μ : Measure α) : (map f μ).comap f = μ := by
ext t _
rw [hf.comap_apply, hf.map_apply, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem ae_map_iff {p : β → Prop} {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) := by
simp only [ae_iff, hf.map_apply, preimage_setOf_eq]
theorem restrict_map (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
Measure.ext fun t ht => by simp [hf.map_apply, ht, hf.measurable ht]
protected theorem comap_preimage (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.map_apply, hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range]
lemma comap_restrict (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).comap f = (μ.comap f).restrict (f ⁻¹' s) := by
ext t ht
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, comap_apply hf, comap_apply hf,
Measure.restrict_apply (hf.measurableSet_image.2 ht), image_inter_preimage]
lemma restrict_comap (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) :
(μ.comap f).restrict s = (μ.restrict (f '' s)).comap f := by
rw [comap_restrict hf, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
end
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map e).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| e ⁻¹' s).map e :=
e.measurableEmbedding.restrict_map _ _
end MeasurableEmbedding
section Subtype
theorem comap_subtype_coe_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) (t : Set s) : comap (↑) μ t = μ ((↑) '' t) :=
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).comap_apply _ _
theorem map_comap_subtype_coe {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) : (comap (↑) μ).map ((↑) : s → α) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem ae_restrict_iff_subtype {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ (x : s) ∂comap ((↑) : s → α) μ, p x := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).ae_map_iff]
variable [MeasureSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-!
### Volume on `s : Set α`
Note the instance is provided earlier as `Subtype.measureSpace`.
-/
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem volume_set_coe_def (s : Set α) : (volume : Measure s) = comap ((↑) : s → α) volume :=
rfl
theorem MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
volume.map ((↑) : s → α) = restrict volume s := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap volume, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem volume_image_subtype_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) :
volume ((↑) '' t : Set α) = volume t :=
(comap_subtype_coe_apply hs volume t).symm
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_coe (hs : NullMeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
volume (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = volume (t ∩ s) := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def,
comap_apply₀ _ _ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun h => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs)
(measurable_subtype_coe ht).nullMeasurableSet,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
end Subtype
section Piecewise
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f g : α → β}
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs]
exact (piecewise_eqOn s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl]
exact (piecewise_eqOn_compl s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)]
(hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.piecewise f g =ᵐ[μ] t.piecewise f g :=
hst.mem_iff.mono fun x hx => by simp [piecewise, hx]
end Piecewise
section IndicatorFunction
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem [Zero β] {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∈ t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ t ∈ Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) := by
classical
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite]
simp_rw [Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0
simp only [ht, ← Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, compl_compl, Set.compl_union, if_true,
Set.preimage_const]
simp_rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right, Set.compl_inter_self s, Set.union_empty]
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem [Zero β] {t : Set β} (ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0 := by
classical
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite, Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0
simp only [ht, if_false, Set.compl_empty, Set.empty_diff, Set.inter_univ, Set.preimage_const]
theorem map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae [Zero β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) ≤ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) := by
intro t
by_cases ht : (0 : β) ∈ t
· rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem ht hs]
exact id
rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem ht, mem_map_restrict_ae_iff hs]
exact fun h => measure_mono_null (Set.inter_subset_left.trans Set.subset_union_left) h
variable [Zero β]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs.compl] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hx hxs, Pi.zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_zero_of_restrict_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, hx hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp [hx, hxs]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hst
theorem indicator_meas_zero (hs : μ s = 0) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
indicator_empty' f ▸ indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (ae_eq_empty.2 hs)
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iff_indicator_ae_eq {g : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g ↔ s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator g := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> filter_upwards [h] with x hx
· by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp [hxs, hx hxs]
· simp [hxs]
· intro hxs
simpa [hxs] using hx
end IndicatorFunction
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 1,062 | 1,064 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,931 | 2,937 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
/-!
# Regular elements
We introduce left-regular, right-regular and regular elements, along with their `to_additive`
analogues add-left-regular, add-right-regular and add-regular elements.
By definition, a regular element in a commutative ring is a non-zero divisor.
Lemma `isRegular_of_ne_zero` implies that every non-zero element of an integral domain is regular.
Since it assumes that the ring is a `CancelMonoidWithZero` it applies also, for instance, to `ℕ`.
The lemmas in Section `MulZeroClass` show that the `0` element is (left/right-)regular if and
only if the `MulZeroClass` is trivial. This is useful when figuring out stopping conditions for
regular sequences: if `0` is ever an element of a regular sequence, then we can extend the sequence
by adding one further `0`.
The final goal is to develop part of the API to prove, eventually, results about non-zero-divisors.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul R]
/-- A left-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c`
is injective. -/
@[to_additive "An add-left-regular element is an element `c` such that addition
on the left by `c` is injective."]
def IsLeftRegular (c : R) :=
(c * ·).Injective
/-- A right-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the right by `c`
is injective. -/
@[to_additive "An add-right-regular element is an element `c` such that addition
on the right by `c` is injective."]
def IsRightRegular (c : R) :=
(· * c).Injective
/-- An add-regular element is an element `c` such that addition by `c` both on the left and
on the right is injective. -/
structure IsAddRegular {R : Type*} [Add R] (c : R) : Prop where
/-- An add-regular element `c` is left-regular -/
left : IsAddLeftRegular c -- Porting note: It seems like to_additive is misbehaving
/-- An add-regular element `c` is right-regular -/
right : IsAddRightRegular c
/-- A regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication by `c` both on the left and
on the right is injective. -/
structure IsRegular (c : R) : Prop where
/-- A regular element `c` is left-regular -/
left : IsLeftRegular c
/-- A regular element `c` is right-regular -/
right : IsRightRegular c
attribute [simp] IsRegular.left IsRegular.right
attribute [to_additive] IsRegular
@[to_additive]
theorem isRegular_iff {c : R} : IsRegular c ↔ IsLeftRegular c ∧ IsRightRegular c :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => ⟨h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MulLECancellable.isLeftRegular [PartialOrder R] {a : R}
(ha : MulLECancellable a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
ha.Injective
theorem IsLeftRegular.right_of_commute {a : R}
(ca : ∀ b, Commute a b) (h : IsLeftRegular a) : IsRightRegular a :=
fun x y xy => h <| (ca x).trans <| xy.trans <| (ca y).symm
theorem IsRightRegular.left_of_commute {a : R}
(ca : ∀ b, Commute a b) (h : IsRightRegular a) : IsLeftRegular a := by
simp_rw [@Commute.symm_iff R _ a] at ca
exact fun x y xy => h <| (ca x).trans <| xy.trans <| (ca y).symm
theorem Commute.isRightRegular_iff {a : R} (ca : ∀ b, Commute a b) :
IsRightRegular a ↔ IsLeftRegular a :=
⟨IsRightRegular.left_of_commute ca, IsLeftRegular.right_of_commute ca⟩
theorem Commute.isRegular_iff {a : R} (ca : ∀ b, Commute a b) : IsRegular a ↔ IsLeftRegular a :=
⟨fun h => h.left, fun h => ⟨h, h.right_of_commute ca⟩⟩
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup R] {a b : R}
/-- In a semigroup, the product of left-regular elements is left-regular. -/
@[to_additive "In an additive semigroup, the sum of add-left-regular elements is add-left.regular."]
theorem IsLeftRegular.mul (lra : IsLeftRegular a) (lrb : IsLeftRegular b) : IsLeftRegular (a * b) :=
show Function.Injective (((a * b) * ·)) from comp_mul_left a b ▸ lra.comp lrb
/-- In a semigroup, the product of right-regular elements is right-regular. -/
@[to_additive "In an additive semigroup, the sum of add-right-regular elements is
add-right-regular."]
theorem IsRightRegular.mul (rra : IsRightRegular a) (rrb : IsRightRegular b) :
IsRightRegular (a * b) :=
show Function.Injective (· * (a * b)) from comp_mul_right b a ▸ rrb.comp rra
/-- In a semigroup, the product of regular elements is regular. -/
@[to_additive "In an additive semigroup, the sum of add-regular elements is add-regular."]
theorem IsRegular.mul (rra : IsRegular a) (rrb : IsRegular b) :
IsRegular (a * b) :=
⟨rra.left.mul rrb.left, rra.right.mul rrb.right⟩
/-- If an element `b` becomes left-regular after multiplying it on the left by a left-regular
element, then `b` is left-regular. -/
@[to_additive "If an element `b` becomes add-left-regular after adding to it on the left
an add-left-regular element, then `b` is add-left-regular."]
theorem IsLeftRegular.of_mul (ab : IsLeftRegular (a * b)) : IsLeftRegular b :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := (a * ·)) (by rwa [comp_mul_left a b])
/-- An element is left-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by a left-regular element
is left-regular. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An element is add-left-regular if and only if adding to it on the left
an add-left-regular element is add-left-regular."]
theorem mul_isLeftRegular_iff (b : R) (ha : IsLeftRegular a) :
IsLeftRegular (a * b) ↔ IsLeftRegular b :=
⟨fun ab => IsLeftRegular.of_mul ab, fun ab => IsLeftRegular.mul ha ab⟩
/-- If an element `b` becomes right-regular after multiplying it on the right by a right-regular
element, then `b` is right-regular. -/
@[to_additive "If an element `b` becomes add-right-regular after adding to it on the right
an add-right-regular element, then `b` is add-right-regular."]
theorem IsRightRegular.of_mul (ab : IsRightRegular (b * a)) : IsRightRegular b := by
refine fun x y xy => ab (?_ : x * (b * a) = y * (b * a))
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]
exact congr_arg (· * a) xy
/-- An element is right-regular if and only if multiplying it on the right with a right-regular
element is right-regular. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An element is add-right-regular if and only if adding it on the right to
an add-right-regular element is add-right-regular."]
theorem mul_isRightRegular_iff (b : R) (ha : IsRightRegular a) :
IsRightRegular (b * a) ↔ IsRightRegular b :=
⟨fun ab => IsRightRegular.of_mul ab, fun ab => IsRightRegular.mul ab ha⟩
/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are regular. -/
@[to_additive "Two elements `a` and `b` are add-regular if and only if both sums `a + b` and
`b + a` are add-regular."]
theorem isRegular_mul_and_mul_iff :
IsRegular (a * b) ∧ IsRegular (b * a) ↔ IsRegular a ∧ IsRegular b := by
| refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
exact
⟨⟨IsLeftRegular.of_mul ba.left, IsRightRegular.of_mul ab.right⟩,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Regular/Basic.lean | 159 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Ideal
/-!
# Ideal operations for Lie algebras
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, there is a natural action of the Lie ideals of `L`
on the Lie submodules of `M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, this
provides a pairing of Lie ideals which is especially important. For example, it can be used to
define solvability / nilpotency of a Lie algebra via the derived / lower-central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.hasBracket`
* `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span`
* `LieIdeal.map_bracket_le`
* `LieIdeal.comap_bracket_le`
## Notation
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` and a Lie
ideal `I ⊆ L`, we introduce the notation `⁅I, N⁆` for the Lie submodule of `M` corresponding to
the action defined in this file.
## Tags
lie algebra, ideal operation
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
theorem map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : Set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
theorem map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf
theorem le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : Set M).subset_preimage_image f
theorem comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact (N : Set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_incl : map N.incl (comap N.incl N') = N ⊓ N' := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj]
exact (N : Submodule R M).map_comap_subtype N'
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M₂] (I J : LieIdeal R L)
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the set of Lie ideals of `L` acts on the set
of submodules of `M`. -/
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }⟩
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } :=
rfl
/-- See also `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'` and
`LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_tensor_map_range`. -/
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' _ ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hm'
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ _ _ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' _ hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅x, n⁆ | (x ∈ I) (n ∈ N) } := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
theorem lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩
exact h x hx m hm
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply subset_lieSpan; use x, m
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
lie_coe_mem_lie ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
theorem lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ := by
suffices ∀ I J : LieIdeal R L, ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆ by exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I)
clear! I J; intro I J
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro x ⟨y, z, h⟩; rw [← h]
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← LieSubmodule.coe_neg]
apply lie_coe_mem_lie
theorem lie_le_right : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
exact N.lie_mem n.property
theorem lie_le_left : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I := by rw [lie_comm]; exact lie_le_right I J
theorem lie_le_inf : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I ⊓ J := by rw [le_inf_iff]; exact ⟨lie_le_left I J, lie_le_right J I⟩
@[simp]
theorem lie_bot : ⁅I, (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⁆ = ⊥ := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; apply lie_le_right
@[simp]
theorem bot_lie : ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ := by
suffices ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ ≤ ⊥ by exact le_bot_iff.mp this
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
change x ∈ (⊥ : LieIdeal R L) at hx; rw [mem_bot] at hx; simp [hx]
theorem lie_eq_bot_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅(x : L), m⁆ = 0 := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⁅x, m⁆ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h - ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩⟩
exact h x hx n hn
variable {I J N N'} in
theorem mono_lie (h₁ : I ≤ J) (h₂ : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N'⁆ := by
intro m h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan] at h; rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN; apply h; rintro m' ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, hm⟩; rw [← hm]; apply hN
use ⟨x, h₁ hx⟩, ⟨n, h₂ hn⟩
variable {I J} in
theorem mono_lie_left (h : I ≤ J) : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N⁆ :=
mono_lie h (le_refl N)
variable {N N'} in
theorem mono_lie_right (h : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N'⁆ :=
mono_lie (le_refl I) h
@[simp]
theorem lie_sup : ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_right <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
suffices ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
rintro m ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, h⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup] at hn ⊢
rcases hn with ⟨n₁, hn₁, n₂, hn₂, hn'⟩
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ : N')⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
simp [← h, ← hn']
@[simp]
theorem sup_lie : ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_left <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
suffices ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, h⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨x₁, hx₁, x₂, hx₂, hx'⟩
use ⁅((⟨x₁, hx₁⟩ : I) : L), (n : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
use ⁅((⟨x₂, hx₂⟩ : J) : L), (n : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
simp [← h, ← hx']
theorem lie_inf : ⁅I, N ⊓ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅I, N'⁆ := by
rw [le_inf_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_right <;> [exact inf_le_left; exact inf_le_right]
|
theorem inf_lie : ⁅I ⊓ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅J, N⁆ := by
rw [le_inf_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_left <;> [exact inf_le_left; exact inf_le_right]
theorem map_bracket_eq [LieModule R L M] : map f ⁅I, N⁆ = ⁅I, map f N⁆ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_map, lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span,
lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span, Submodule.map_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, hm⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 203 | 214 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
/-!
# Reverse of a univariate polynomial
The main definition is `reverse`. Applying `reverse` to a polynomial `f : R[X]` produces
the polynomial with a reversed list of coefficients, equivalent to `X^f.natDegree * f(1/X)`.
The main result is that `reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g`, provided the leading
coefficients of `f` and `g` do not multiply to zero.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAtFun N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
This is the map used by the embedding `revAt`.
-/
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAt N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
Essentially, this embedding is only used for `i ≤ N`.
The advantage of `revAt N i` over `N - i` is that `revAt` is an involution.
-/
def revAt (N : ℕ) : Function.Embedding ℕ ℕ where
toFun i := ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
inj' := revAtFun_inj
/-- We prefer to use the bundled `revAt` over unbundled `revAtFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem revAtFun_eq (N i : ℕ) : revAtFun N i = revAt N i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem revAt_invol {N i : ℕ} : (revAt N) (revAt N i) = i :=
revAtFun_invol
@[simp]
theorem revAt_le {N i : ℕ} (H : i ≤ N) : revAt N i = N - i :=
if_pos H
lemma revAt_eq_self_of_lt {N i : ℕ} (h : N < i) : revAt N i = i := by simp [revAt, Nat.not_le.mpr h]
theorem revAt_add {N O n o : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (ho : o ≤ O) :
revAt (N + O) (n + o) = revAt N n + revAt O o := by
rcases Nat.le.dest hn with ⟨n', rfl⟩
rcases Nat.le.dest ho with ⟨o', rfl⟩
repeat' rw [revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
rw [add_assoc, add_left_comm n' o, ← add_assoc, revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
repeat' rw [add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem revAt_zero (N : ℕ) : revAt N 0 = N := by simp
/-- `reflect N f` is the polynomial such that `(reflect N f).coeff i = f.coeff (revAt N i)`.
In other words, the terms with exponent `[0, ..., N]` now have exponent `[N, ..., 0]`.
In practice, `reflect` is only used when `N` is at least as large as the degree of `f`.
Eventually, it will be used with `N` exactly equal to the degree of `f`. -/
noncomputable def reflect (N : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f⟩
theorem reflect_support (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) :
(reflect N f).support = Finset.image (revAt N) f.support := by
rcases f with ⟨⟩
ext1
simp only [reflect, support_ofFinsupp, support_embDomain, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_reflect (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (i : ℕ) : coeff (reflect N f) i = f.coeff (revAt N i) := by
rcases f with ⟨f⟩
simp only [reflect, coeff]
calc
Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f i = Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f (revAt N (revAt N i)) := by
rw [revAt_invol]
_ = f (revAt N i) := Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem reflect_zero {N : ℕ} : reflect N (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reflect_eq_zero_iff {N : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : reflect N (f : R[X]) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [ofFinsupp_eq_zero, reflect, embDomain_eq_zero, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_add (f g : R[X]) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (f + g) = reflect N f + reflect N g := by
ext
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_reflect]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C_mul (f : R[X]) (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r * f) = C r * reflect N f := by
ext
simp only [coeff_reflect, coeff_C_mul]
theorem reflect_C_mul_X_pow (N n : ℕ) {c : R} : reflect N (C c * X ^ n) = C c * X ^ revAt N n := by
ext
rw [reflect_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow, coeff_reflect]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, revAt_invol, coeff_X_pow_self]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp]
intro a
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← C_1] at a
apply h
rw [← mem_support_C_mul_X_pow a, revAt_invol]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r) = C r * X ^ N := by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_one (C r), ← pow_zero X, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, revAt_zero]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_monomial (N n : ℕ) : reflect N ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = X ^ revAt N n := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← one_mul (X ^ revAt N n), ← C_1, reflect_C_mul_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma reflect_one_X : reflect 1 (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa using reflect_monomial 1 1 (R := R)
lemma reflect_map {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).reflect n = (p.reflect n).map f := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma reflect_one (n : ℕ) : (1 : R[X]).reflect n = Polynomial.X ^ n := by
rw [← C.map_one, reflect_C, map_one, one_mul]
theorem reflect_mul_induction (cf cg : ℕ) :
∀ N O : ℕ,
∀ f g : R[X],
#f.support ≤ cf.succ →
#g.support ≤ cg.succ →
f.natDegree ≤ N →
g.natDegree ≤ O → reflect (N + O) (f * g) = reflect N f * reflect O g := by
induction' cf with cf hcf
--first induction (left): base case
· induction' cg with cg hcg
-- second induction (right): base case
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cf, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cg]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ← pow_add (X : R[X]), reflect_C_mul,
reflect_monomial, add_comm, revAt_add Nf Og, mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ←
pow_add (X : R[X]), add_comm]
-- second induction (right): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases g0 : g = 0
· rw [g0, reflect_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow g, mul_add, reflect_add, reflect_add, mul_add, hcg, hcg] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le g.leadingCoeff g.natDegree) Og
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cg (eraseLead_support_card_lt g0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Og
--first induction (left): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases f0 : f = 0
· rw [f0, reflect_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow f, add_mul, reflect_add, reflect_add, add_mul, hcf, hcf] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le f.leadingCoeff f.natDegree) Nf
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cf (eraseLead_support_card_lt f0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Nf
@[simp]
theorem reflect_mul (f g : R[X]) {F G : ℕ} (Ff : f.natDegree ≤ F) (Gg : g.natDegree ≤ G) :
reflect (F + G) (f * g) = reflect F f * reflect G g :=
reflect_mul_induction _ _ F G f g f.support.card.le_succ g.support.card.le_succ Ff Gg
section Eval₂
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂_reflect_mul_pow (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f := by
refine
induction_with_natDegree_le (fun f => eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f) _ ?_ ?_
?_ f hf
· simp
· intro n r _ hnN
simp only [revAt_le hnN, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_C, eval₂_mul]
conv in x ^ N => rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hnN]
rw [pow_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc (i r), ← mul_pow, invOf_mul_self, one_pow, mul_one]
· intros
simp [*, add_mul]
theorem eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) = 0 ↔ eval₂ i x f = 0 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← eval₂_reflect_mul_pow i x N f hf]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h, zero_mul]
· intro h
rw [← mul_one (eval₂ i (⅟ x) _), ← one_pow N, ← mul_invOf_self x, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, h,
zero_mul]
end Eval₂
/-- The reverse of a polynomial f is the polynomial obtained by "reading f backwards".
Even though this is not the actual definition, `reverse f = f (1/X) * X ^ f.natDegree`. -/
noncomputable def reverse (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
reflect f.natDegree f
theorem coeff_reverse (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : f.reverse.coeff n = f.coeff (revAt f.natDegree n) := by
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_reverse (f : R[X]) : coeff (reverse f) 0 = leadingCoeff f := by
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt_le (zero_le f.natDegree), tsub_zero, leadingCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_zero : reverse (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_eq_zero : f.reverse = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp [reverse]
theorem reverse_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro n hn
rw [Nat.cast_lt] at hn
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, if_neg (not_le_of_gt hn),
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn]
theorem natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree (f : R[X]) :
f.natDegree = f.reverse.natDegree + f.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, reverse_zero, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
apply le_antisymm
· refine tsub_le_iff_right.mp ?_
apply le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect, ← revAt_le f.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree, revAt_invol]
exact trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr hf
· rw [← le_tsub_iff_left f.reverse_natDegree_le]
apply natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
have key := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp (mt reverse_eq_zero.mp hf)
rwa [leadingCoeff, coeff_reverse, revAt_le f.reverse_natDegree_le] at key
theorem reverse_natDegree (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natDegree = f.natDegree - f.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [f.natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem reverse_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.leadingCoeff = f.trailingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, reverse_natDegree, ← revAt_le f.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree,
coeff_reverse, revAt_invol, trailingCoeff]
theorem natTrailingDegree_reverse (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natTrailingDegree = 0 := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_zero, reverse_eq_zero, coeff_zero_reverse, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
exact eq_or_ne _ _
theorem reverse_trailingCoeff (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.trailingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
rw [trailingCoeff, natTrailingDegree_reverse, coeff_zero_reverse]
theorem reverse_mul {f g : R[X]} (fg : f.leadingCoeff * g.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g := by
unfold reverse
rw [natDegree_mul' fg, reflect_mul f g rfl.le rfl.le]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_mul_of_domain {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] (f g : R[X]) :
reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g := by
by_cases f0 : f = 0
· simp only [f0, zero_mul, reverse_zero]
by_cases g0 : g = 0
· rw [g0, mul_zero, reverse_zero, mul_zero]
simp [reverse_mul, *]
theorem trailingCoeff_mul {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] (p q : R[X]) :
(p * q).trailingCoeff = p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff := by
rw [← reverse_leadingCoeff, reverse_mul_of_domain, leadingCoeff_mul, reverse_leadingCoeff,
reverse_leadingCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_reverse (f : R[X]) : coeff (reverse f) 1 = nextCoeff f := by
rw [coeff_reverse, nextCoeff]
split_ifs with hf
· have : coeff f 1 = 0 := coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (by simp only [hf, zero_lt_one])
simp [*, revAt]
· rw [revAt_le]
exact Nat.succ_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hf)
@[simp] lemma reverse_C (t : R) :
reverse (C t) = C t := by
simp [reverse]
@[simp] lemma reverse_mul_X (p : R[X]) : reverse (p * X) = reverse p := by
nontriviality R
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp
· simp
· simp [reverse, hp]
@[simp] lemma reverse_X_mul (p : R[X]) : reverse (X * p) = reverse p := by
rw [commute_X p, reverse_mul_X]
@[simp] lemma reverse_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : reverse (p * X ^ n) = reverse p := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, reverse_mul_X, ih]
@[simp] lemma reverse_X_pow_mul (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : reverse (X ^ n * p) = reverse p := by
rw [commute_X_pow p, reverse_mul_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma reverse_add_C (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
reverse (p + C t) = reverse p + C t * X ^ p.natDegree := by
simp [reverse]
@[simp] lemma reverse_C_add (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
reverse (C t + p) = C t * X ^ p.natDegree + reverse p := by
rw [add_comm, reverse_add_C, add_comm]
section Eval₂
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂_reverse_mul_pow (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (f : R[X]) :
eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reverse f) * x ^ f.natDegree = eval₂ i x f :=
eval₂_reflect_mul_pow i _ _ f le_rfl
@[simp]
| theorem eval₂_reverse_eq_zero_iff (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (f : R[X]) :
eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reverse f) = 0 ↔ eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff i x _ _ le_rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 345 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Ineq
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
/-!
# Sign of a permutation
The main definition of this file is `Equiv.Perm.sign`,
associating a `ℤˣ` sign with a permutation.
Other lemmas have been moved to `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fintype`
-/
universe u v
open Equiv Function Fintype Finset
variable {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {β : Type v}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-- `modSwap i j` contains permutations up to swapping `i` and `j`.
We use this to partition permutations in `Matrix.det_zero_of_row_eq`, such that each partition
sums up to `0`.
-/
def modSwap (i j : α) : Setoid (Perm α) :=
⟨fun σ τ => σ = τ ∨ σ = swap i j * τ, fun σ => Or.inl (refl σ), fun {σ τ} h =>
Or.casesOn h (fun h => Or.inl h.symm) fun h => Or.inr (by rw [h, swap_mul_self_mul]),
fun {σ τ υ} hστ hτυ => by
rcases hστ with hστ | hστ <;> rcases hτυ with hτυ | hτυ <;>
(try rw [hστ, hτυ, swap_mul_self_mul]) <;>
simp [hστ, hτυ]⟩
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (i j : α) :
DecidableRel (modSwap i j).r :=
fun _ _ => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∨ _))
/-- Given a list `l : List α` and a permutation `f : Perm α` such that the nonfixed points of `f`
are in `l`, recursively factors `f` as a product of transpositions. -/
def swapFactorsAux :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α),
(∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) → { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g }
| [] => fun f h =>
⟨[],
Equiv.ext fun x => by
rw [List.prod_nil]
exact (Classical.not_not.1 (mt h List.not_mem_nil)).symm,
by simp⟩
| x::l => fun f h =>
if hfx : x = f x then
swapFactorsAux l f fun {y} hy =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h hy)
else
let m :=
swapFactorsAux l (swap x (f x) * f) fun {y} hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h this.1)
⟨swap x (f x)::m.1, by
rw [List.prod_cons, m.2.1, ← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap x (f x)), swap_swap, ← one_def,
one_mul],
fun {_} hg => ((List.mem_cons).1 hg).elim (fun h => ⟨x, f x, hfx, h⟩) (m.2.2 _)⟩
/-- `swapFactors` represents a permutation as a product of a list of transpositions.
The representation is non unique and depends on the linear order structure.
For types without linear order `truncSwapFactors` can be used. -/
def swapFactors [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] (f : Perm α) :
{ l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
swapFactorsAux ((@univ α _).sort (· ≤ ·)) f fun {_ _} => (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _)
/-- This computably represents the fact that any permutation can be represented as the product of
a list of transpositions. -/
def truncSwapFactors [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
Trunc { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (@univ α _).1 (fun l h => Trunc.mk (swapFactorsAux l f (h _)))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1 from fun _ _ => mem_univ _)
/-- An induction principle for permutations. If `P` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `P` holds for all permutations. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on [Finite α] {motive : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α)
(one : motive 1) (swap_mul : ∀ f x y, x ≠ y → motive f → motive (swap x y * f)) : motive f := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := (truncSwapFactors f).out
induction l generalizing f with
| nil =>
simp only [one, hl.left.symm, List.prod_nil, forall_true_iff]
| cons g l ih =>
rcases hl.2 g (by simp) with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [← hl.1, List.prod_cons, hxy.2]
exact swap_mul _ _ _ hxy.1 (ih _ ⟨rfl, fun v hv => hl.2 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv)⟩)
theorem mclosure_isSwap [Finite α] : Submonoid.closure { σ : Perm α | IsSwap σ } = ⊤ := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
refine top_unique fun x _ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := Subtype.mem (truncSwapFactors x).out
rw [← h1]
exact Submonoid.list_prod_mem _ fun y hy ↦ Submonoid.subset_closure (h2 y hy)
theorem closure_isSwap [Finite α] : Subgroup.closure { σ : Perm α | IsSwap σ } = ⊤ :=
Subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top mclosure_isSwap
/-- Every finite symmetric group is generated by transpositions of adjacent elements. -/
theorem mclosure_swap_castSucc_succ (n : ℕ) :
Submonoid.closure (Set.range fun i : Fin n ↦ swap i.castSucc i.succ) = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← mclosure_isSwap, Submonoid.closure_le]
rintro _ ⟨i, j, ne, rfl⟩
wlog lt : i < j generalizing i j
· rw [swap_comm]; exact this _ _ ne.symm (ne.lt_or_lt.resolve_left lt)
induction' j using Fin.induction with j ih
· cases lt
have mem : swap j.castSucc j.succ ∈ Submonoid.closure
(Set.range fun (i : Fin n) ↦ swap i.castSucc i.succ) := Submonoid.subset_closure ⟨_, rfl⟩
obtain rfl | lts := (Fin.le_castSucc_iff.mpr lt).eq_or_lt
· exact mem
rw [swap_comm, ← swap_mul_swap_mul_swap (y := Fin.castSucc j) lts.ne lt.ne]
exact mul_mem (mul_mem mem <| ih lts.ne lts) mem
/-- Like `swap_induction_on`, but with the composition on the right of `f`.
An induction principle for permutations. If `motive` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `motive` holds for all permutations. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on' [Finite α] {motive : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) (one : motive 1)
(mul_swap : ∀ f x y, x ≠ y → motive f → motive (f * swap x y)) : motive f :=
inv_inv f ▸ swap_induction_on f⁻¹ one fun f => mul_swap f⁻¹
theorem isConj_swap {w x y z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x) (hyz : y ≠ z) : IsConj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
isConj_iff.2
(have h :
∀ {y z : α},
y ≠ z → w ≠ z → swap w y * swap x z * swap w x * (swap w y * swap x z)⁻¹ = swap y z :=
fun {y z} hyz hwz => by
rw [mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, swap_inv, mul_assoc (swap w y), mul_assoc (swap w y), ←
mul_assoc _ (swap x z), swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwx hwz, ← mul_assoc,
swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwz.symm hyz.symm]
if hwz : w = z then
have hwy : w ≠ y := by rw [hwz]; exact hyz.symm
⟨swap w z * swap x y, by rw [swap_comm y z, h hyz.symm hwy]⟩
else ⟨swap w y * swap x z, h hyz hwz⟩)
/-- set of all pairs (⟨a, b⟩ : Σ a : fin n, fin n) such that b < a -/
def finPairsLT (n : ℕ) : Finset (Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) :=
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).sigma fun a => (range a).attachFin fun _ hm => (mem_range.1 hm).trans a.2
theorem mem_finPairsLT {n : ℕ} {a : Σ _ : Fin n, Fin n} : a ∈ finPairsLT n ↔ a.2 < a.1 := by
simp only [finPairsLT, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, true_and, mem_attachFin, mem_range, mem_univ,
mem_sigma]
/-- `signAux σ` is the sign of a permutation on `Fin n`, defined as the parity of the number of
pairs `(x₁, x₂)` such that `x₂ < x₁` but `σ x₁ ≤ σ x₂` -/
def signAux {n : ℕ} (a : Perm (Fin n)) : ℤˣ :=
∏ x ∈ finPairsLT n, if a x.1 ≤ a x.2 then -1 else 1
@[simp]
theorem signAux_one (n : ℕ) : signAux (1 : Perm (Fin n)) = 1 := by
unfold signAux
conv => rhs; rw [← @Finset.prod_const_one _ _ (finPairsLT n)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a ha => if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).not_le
/-- `signBijAux f ⟨a, b⟩` returns the pair consisting of `f a` and `f b` in decreasing order. -/
def signBijAux {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) (a : Σ _ : Fin n, Fin n) : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n :=
if _ : f a.2 < f a.1 then ⟨f a.1, f a.2⟩ else ⟨f a.2, f a.1⟩
theorem signBijAux_injOn {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
(finPairsLT n : Set (Σ _, Fin n)).InjOn (signBijAux f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ hb h
dsimp [signBijAux] at h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, mem_finPairsLT] at *
have : ¬b₁ < b₂ := hb.le.not_lt
split_ifs at h <;>
simp_all only [not_lt, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, (Equiv.injective f).eq_iff, heq_eq_eq]
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
theorem signBijAux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a ∈ finPairsLT n, ∃ b ∈ finPairsLT n, signBijAux f b = a :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha =>
if hxa : f⁻¹ a₂ < f⁻¹ a₁ then
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₁, f⁻¹ a₂⟩, mem_finPairsLT.2 hxa, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha)]⟩
else
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₂, f⁻¹ a₁⟩,
mem_finPairsLT.2 <|
(le_of_not_gt hxa).lt_of_ne fun h => by
simp [mem_finPairsLT, f⁻¹.injective h, lt_irrefl] at ha, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).le.not_lt]⟩
theorem signBijAux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n, a ∈ finPairsLT n → signBijAux f a ∈ finPairsLT n :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha => by
unfold signBijAux
split_ifs with h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2 h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2
((le_of_not_gt h).lt_of_ne fun h => (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).ne (f.injective h.symm))
@[simp]
theorem signAux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux f⁻¹ = signAux f :=
prod_nbij (signBijAux f⁻¹) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj fun ⟨a, b⟩ hab ↦
if h : f⁻¹ b < f⁻¹ a then by
simp_all [signBijAux, dif_pos h, if_neg h.not_le, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).not_le]
else by
simp_all [signBijAux, if_pos (le_of_not_gt h), dif_neg h, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).le]
theorem signAux_mul {n : ℕ} (f g : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux (f * g) = signAux f * signAux g := by
rw [← signAux_inv g]
unfold signAux
rw [← prod_mul_distrib]
refine prod_nbij (signBijAux g) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj ?_
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ hab
dsimp only [signBijAux]
rw [mul_apply, mul_apply]
rw [mem_finPairsLT] at hab
by_cases h : g b < g a
· rw [dif_pos h]
simp only [not_le_of_gt hab, mul_one, mul_ite, mul_neg, Perm.inv_apply_self, if_false]
· rw [dif_neg h, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self, if_pos hab.le]
by_cases h₁ : f (g b) ≤ f (g a)
· have : f (g b) ≠ f (g a) := by
rw [Ne, f.injective.eq_iff, g.injective.eq_iff]
exact ne_of_lt hab
rw [if_pos h₁, if_neg (h₁.lt_of_ne this).not_le]
rfl
· rw [if_neg h₁, if_pos (lt_of_not_ge h₁).le]
rfl
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one' (n : ℕ) : signAux (swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1) = -1 :=
show _ = ∏ x ∈ {(⟨1, 0⟩ : Σ _ : Fin (n + 2), Fin (n + 2))},
if (Equiv.swap 0 1) x.1 ≤ swap 0 1 x.2 then (-1 : ℤˣ) else 1 by
refine Eq.symm (prod_subset (fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ => by
simp +contextual [mem_finPairsLT, Fin.one_pos]) fun a ha₁ ha₂ => ?_)
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
replace ha₁ : a₂ < a₁ := mem_finPairsLT.1 ha₁
dsimp only
rcases a₁.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· exact absurd a₂.zero_le ha₁.not_le
rcases a₂.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H')
· simp only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, mem_singleton, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at ha₂
have : 1 < a₁ := lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.succ_le_of_lt ha₁)
(Ne.symm (by intro h; apply ha₂; simp [h]))
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 0 = 1 := by simp
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) ha₂, h01, if_neg this.not_le]
· have le : 1 ≤ a₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt H'
have lt : 1 < a₁ := le.trans_lt ha₁
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 1 = 0 := by simp only [swap_apply_right]
rcases le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | lt')
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne H.ne' lt.ne', h01, if_neg H.not_le]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) (ne_of_gt lt),
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H') (ne_of_gt lt'), if_neg ha₁.not_le]
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
signAux (swap (⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩ : Fin n) ⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩) =
-1 := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· norm_num at hn
· norm_num at hn
· exact signAux_swap_zero_one' n
theorem signAux_swap : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x y : Fin n} (_hxy : x ≠ y), signAux (swap x y) = -1
| 0, x, y => by intro; exact Fin.elim0 x
| 1, x, y => by
dsimp [signAux, swap, swapCore]
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, not_true, ite_true, le_refl, prod_const,
IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| n + 2, x, y => fun hxy => by
have h2n : 2 ≤ n + 2 := by exact le_add_self
rw [← isConj_iff_eq, ← signAux_swap_zero_one h2n]
exact (MonoidHom.mk' signAux signAux_mul).map_isConj
(isConj_swap hxy (by exact of_decide_eq_true rfl))
/-- When the list `l : List α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : Perm α`,
`signAux2 l f` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def signAux2 : List α → Perm α → ℤˣ
| [], _ => 1
| x::l, f => if x = f x then signAux2 l f else -signAux2 l (swap x (f x) * f)
theorem signAux_eq_signAux2 {n : ℕ} :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ Fin n) (_h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l),
signAux ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = signAux2 l f
| [], f, e, h => by
have : f = 1 := Equiv.ext fun y => Classical.not_not.1 (mt (h y) List.not_mem_nil)
rw [this, one_def, Equiv.trans_refl, Equiv.symm_trans_self, ← one_def, signAux_one, signAux2]
| x::l, f, e, h => by
rw [signAux2]
by_cases hfx : x = f x
· rw [if_pos hfx]
exact
signAux_eq_signAux2 l f _ fun y (hy : f y ≠ y) =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h y hy)
· have hy : ∀ y : α, (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y → y ∈ l := fun y hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h _ this.1)
have : (e.symm.trans (swap x (f x) * f)).trans e =
swap (e x) (e (f x)) * (e.symm.trans f).trans e := by
ext
rw [← Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def, Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def]
repeat (rw [trans_apply])
simp [swap, swapCore]
split_ifs <;> rfl
have hefx : e x ≠ e (f x) := mt e.injective.eq_iff.1 hfx
rw [if_neg hfx, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e hy, this, signAux_mul, signAux_swap hefx]
simp only [neg_neg, one_mul, neg_mul]
/-- When the multiset `s : Multiset α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : Perm α`,
`signAux2 f _` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def signAux3 [Finite α] (f : Perm α) {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → ℤˣ :=
Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => signAux2 l f) fun l₁ l₂ h ↦ by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
refine Function.hfunext (forall_congr fun _ ↦ propext h.mem_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _ ↦ ?_
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₁ _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₂ _]
theorem signAux3_mul_and_swap [Finite α] (f g : Perm α) (s : Multiset α) (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) :
signAux3 (f * g) hs = signAux3 f hs * signAux3 g hs ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux3 (swap x y) hs = -1 := by
obtain ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin α
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn with | _ l => ?_
show
signAux2 l (f * g) = signAux2 l f * signAux2 l g ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux2 l (swap x y) = -1
have hfg : (e.symm.trans (f * g)).trans e = (e.symm.trans f).trans e * (e.symm.trans g).trans e :=
Equiv.ext fun h => by simp [mul_apply]
constructor
· rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ←
signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _,
hfg, signAux_mul]
· intro x y hxy
rw [← e.injective.ne_iff] at hxy
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, symm_trans_swap_trans, signAux_swap hxy]
theorem signAux3_symm_trans_trans [Finite α] [DecidableEq β] [Finite β] (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ β)
{s : Multiset α} {t : Multiset β} (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) (ht : ∀ x, x ∈ t) :
signAux3 ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) ht = signAux3 f hs := by
induction' t, s using Quotient.inductionOn₂ with t s ht hs
show signAux2 _ _ = signAux2 _ _
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin β with ⟨n, ⟨e'⟩⟩
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e' fun _ _ => ht _,
← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ (e.trans e') fun _ _ => hs _]
exact congr_arg signAux
(Equiv.ext fun x => by simp [Equiv.coe_trans, apply_eq_iff_eq, symm_trans_apply])
/-- `SignType.sign` of a permutation returns the signature or parity of a permutation, `1` for even
permutations, `-1` for odd permutations. It is the unique surjective group homomorphism from
`Perm α` to the group with two elements. -/
def sign [Fintype α] : Perm α →* ℤˣ :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun f => signAux3 f mem_univ) fun f g => (signAux3_mul_and_swap f g _ mem_univ).1
section SignType.sign
variable [Fintype α]
@[simp]
theorem sign_mul (f g : Perm α) : sign (f * g) = sign f * sign g :=
MonoidHom.map_mul sign f g
@[simp]
theorem sign_trans (f g : Perm α) : sign (f.trans g) = sign g * sign f := by
rw [← mul_def, sign_mul]
@[simp]
theorem sign_one : sign (1 : Perm α) = 1 :=
MonoidHom.map_one sign
@[simp]
theorem sign_refl : sign (Equiv.refl α) = 1 :=
MonoidHom.map_one sign
@[simp]
theorem sign_inv (f : Perm α) : sign f⁻¹ = sign f := by
rw [MonoidHom.map_inv sign f, Int.units_inv_eq_self]
@[simp]
theorem sign_symm (e : Perm α) : sign e.symm = sign e :=
sign_inv e
theorem sign_swap {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : sign (swap x y) = -1 :=
(signAux3_mul_and_swap 1 1 _ mem_univ).2 h
@[simp]
theorem sign_swap' {x y : α} : sign (swap x y) = if x = y then 1 else -1 :=
if H : x = y then by simp [H, swap_self] else by simp [sign_swap H, H]
theorem IsSwap.sign_eq {f : Perm α} (h : f.IsSwap) : sign f = -1 :=
let ⟨_, _, hxy⟩ := h
hxy.2.symm ▸ sign_swap hxy.1
@[simp]
theorem sign_symm_trans_trans [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ β) :
sign ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = sign f :=
signAux3_symm_trans_trans f e mem_univ mem_univ
@[simp]
theorem sign_trans_trans_symm [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] (f : Perm β) (e : α ≃ β) :
sign ((e.trans f).trans e.symm) = sign f :=
sign_symm_trans_trans f e.symm
theorem sign_prod_list_swap {l : List (Perm α)} (hl : ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g) :
sign l.prod = (-1) ^ l.length := by
have h₁ : l.map sign = List.replicate l.length (-1) :=
List.eq_replicate_iff.2
⟨by simp, fun u hu =>
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := List.mem_map.1 hu
hg.2 ▸ (hl _ hg.1).sign_eq⟩
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← h₁, List.prod_hom _ (@sign α _ _)]
@[simp]
theorem sign_abs (f : Perm α) :
|(Equiv.Perm.sign f : ℤ)| = 1 := by
rw [Int.abs_eq_natAbs, Int.units_natAbs, Nat.cast_one]
variable (α) in
theorem sign_surjective [Nontrivial α] : Function.Surjective (sign : Perm α → ℤˣ) := fun a =>
(Int.units_eq_one_or a).elim (fun h => ⟨1, by simp [h]⟩) fun h =>
let ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne α
⟨swap x y, by rw [sign_swap hxy, h]⟩
theorem eq_sign_of_surjective_hom {s : Perm α →* ℤˣ} (hs : Surjective s) : s = sign :=
have : ∀ {f}, IsSwap f → s f = -1 := fun {f} ⟨x, y, hxy, hxy'⟩ =>
hxy'.symm ▸
by_contradiction fun h => by
have : ∀ f, IsSwap f → s f = 1 := fun f ⟨a, b, hab, hab'⟩ => by
rw [← isConj_iff_eq, ← Or.resolve_right (Int.units_eq_one_or _) h, hab']
exact s.map_isConj (isConj_swap hab hxy)
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hs (-1)
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := (truncSwapFactors g).out
have : ∀ a ∈ l.map s, a = (1 : ℤˣ) := fun a ha =>
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := List.mem_map.1 ha
hg.2 ▸ this _ (hl.2 _ hg.1)
have : s l.prod = 1 := by
rw [← l.prod_hom s, List.eq_replicate_length.2 this, List.prod_replicate, one_pow]
rw [hl.1, hg] at this
exact absurd this (by simp_all)
MonoidHom.ext fun f => by
let ⟨l, hl₁, hl₂⟩ := (truncSwapFactors f).out
have hsl : ∀ a ∈ l.map s, a = (-1 : ℤˣ) := fun a ha =>
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := List.mem_map.1 ha
hg.2 ▸ this (hl₂ _ hg.1)
rw [← hl₁, ← l.prod_hom s, List.eq_replicate_length.2 hsl, List.length_map, List.prod_replicate,
sign_prod_list_swap hl₂]
theorem sign_subtypePerm (f : Perm α) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h₁ : ∀ x, p x ↔ p (f x))
(h₂ : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → p x) : sign (subtypePerm f h₁) = sign f := by
let l := (truncSwapFactors (subtypePerm f h₁)).out
have hl' : ∀ g' ∈ l.1.map ofSubtype, IsSwap g' := fun g' hg' =>
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := List.mem_map.1 hg'
hg.2 ▸ (l.2.2 _ hg.1).of_subtype_isSwap
have hl'₂ : (l.1.map ofSubtype).prod = f := by
rw [l.1.prod_hom ofSubtype, l.2.1, ofSubtype_subtypePerm _ h₂]
conv =>
congr
rw [← l.2.1]
simp_rw [← hl'₂]
rw [sign_prod_list_swap l.2.2, sign_prod_list_swap hl', List.length_map]
theorem sign_eq_sign_of_equiv [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] (f : Perm α) (g : Perm β) (e : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀ x, e (f x) = g (e x)) : sign f = sign g := by
have hg : g = (e.symm.trans f).trans e := Equiv.ext <| by simp [h]
rw [hg, sign_symm_trans_trans]
theorem sign_bij [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] {f : Perm α} {g : Perm β} (i : ∀ x : α, f x ≠ x → β)
(h : ∀ x hx hx', i (f x) hx' = g (i x hx)) (hi : ∀ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂, i x₁ hx₁ = i x₂ hx₂ → x₁ = x₂)
(hg : ∀ y, g y ≠ y → ∃ x hx, i x hx = y) : sign f = sign g :=
calc
sign f = sign (subtypePerm f <| by simp : Perm { x // f x ≠ x }) :=
(sign_subtypePerm _ _ fun _ => id).symm
_ = sign (subtypePerm g <| by simp : Perm { x // g x ≠ x }) :=
sign_eq_sign_of_equiv _ _
(Equiv.ofBijective
(fun x : { x // f x ≠ x } =>
(⟨i x.1 x.2, by
have : f (f x) ≠ f x := mt (fun h => f.injective h) x.2
rw [← h _ x.2 this]
exact mt (hi _ _ this x.2) x.2⟩ :
{ y // g y ≠ y }))
⟨fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h => Subtype.eq (hi _ _ _ _ (Subtype.mk.inj h)), fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hfx, hx⟩ := hg y hy
⟨⟨x, hfx⟩, Subtype.eq hx⟩⟩)
fun ⟨x, _⟩ => Subtype.eq (h x _ _)
_ = sign g := sign_subtypePerm _ _ fun _ => id
/-- If we apply `prod_extendRight a (σ a)` for all `a : α` in turn,
we get `prod_congrRight σ`. -/
theorem prod_prodExtendRight {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (σ : α → Perm β) {l : List α}
(hl : l.Nodup) (mem_l : ∀ a, a ∈ l) :
(l.map fun a => prodExtendRight a (σ a)).prod = prodCongrRight σ := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
-- We'll use induction on the list of elements,
-- but we have to keep track of whether we already passed `a` in the list.
suffices a ∈ l ∧ (l.map fun a => prodExtendRight a (σ a)).prod (a, b) = (a, σ a b) ∨
a ∉ l ∧ (l.map fun a => prodExtendRight a (σ a)).prod (a, b) = (a, b) by
obtain ⟨_, prod_eq⟩ := Or.resolve_right this (not_and.mpr fun h _ => h (mem_l a))
rw [prod_eq, prodCongrRight_apply]
clear mem_l
induction' l with a' l ih
· refine Or.inr ⟨List.not_mem_nil, ?_⟩
rw [List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, one_apply]
rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_apply]
rcases ih (List.nodup_cons.mp hl).2 with (⟨mem_l, prod_eq⟩ | ⟨not_mem_l, prod_eq⟩) <;>
rw [prod_eq]
· refine Or.inl ⟨List.mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_l, ?_⟩
rw [prodExtendRight_apply_ne _ fun h : a = a' => (List.nodup_cons.mp hl).1 (h ▸ mem_l)]
by_cases ha' : a = a'
· rw [← ha'] at *
refine Or.inl ⟨l.mem_cons_self, ?_⟩
rw [prodExtendRight_apply_eq]
· refine Or.inr ⟨fun h => not_or_intro ha' not_mem_l ((List.mem_cons).mp h), ?_⟩
rw [prodExtendRight_apply_ne _ ha']
section congr
variable [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem sign_prodExtendRight (a : α) (σ : Perm β) : sign (prodExtendRight a σ) = sign σ :=
sign_bij (fun (ab : α × β) _ => ab.snd)
(fun ⟨a', b⟩ hab _ => by simp [eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne hab])
(fun ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ hab₁ hab₂ h => by
simpa [eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne hab₁, eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne hab₂] using h)
fun y hy => ⟨(a, y), by simpa, by simp⟩
theorem sign_prodCongrRight (σ : α → Perm β) : sign (prodCongrRight σ) = ∏ k, sign (σ k) := by
obtain ⟨l, hl, mem_l⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
have l_to_finset : l.toFinset = Finset.univ := by
apply eq_top_iff.mpr
intro b _
exact List.mem_toFinset.mpr (mem_l b)
rw [← prod_prodExtendRight σ hl mem_l, map_list_prod sign, List.map_map, ← l_to_finset,
List.prod_toFinset _ hl]
simp_rw [← fun a => sign_prodExtendRight a (σ a), Function.comp_def]
theorem sign_prodCongrLeft (σ : α → Perm β) : sign (prodCongrLeft σ) = ∏ k, sign (σ k) := by
refine (sign_eq_sign_of_equiv _ _ (prodComm β α) ?_).trans (sign_prodCongrRight σ)
rintro ⟨b, α⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sign_permCongr (e : α ≃ β) (p : Perm α) : sign (e.permCongr p) = sign p :=
sign_eq_sign_of_equiv _ _ e.symm (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem sign_sumCongr (σa : Perm α) (σb : Perm β) : sign (sumCongr σa σb) = sign σa * sign σb := by
suffices sign (sumCongr σa (1 : Perm β)) = sign σa ∧ sign (sumCongr (1 : Perm α) σb) = sign σb
by rw [← this.1, ← this.2, ← sign_mul, sumCongr_mul, one_mul, mul_one]
constructor
· induction σa using swap_induction_on with
| one => simp
| swap_mul σa' a₁ a₂ ha ih =>
rw [← one_mul (1 : Perm β), ← sumCongr_mul, sign_mul, sign_mul, ih, sumCongr_swap_one,
sign_swap ha, sign_swap (Sum.inl_injective.ne_iff.mpr ha)]
· induction σb using swap_induction_on with
| one => simp
| swap_mul σb' b₁ b₂ hb ih =>
rw [← one_mul (1 : Perm α), ← sumCongr_mul, sign_mul, sign_mul, ih, sumCongr_one_swap,
sign_swap hb, sign_swap (Sum.inr_injective.ne_iff.mpr hb)]
@[simp]
theorem sign_subtypeCongr {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (ep : Perm { a // p a })
(en : Perm { a // ¬p a }) : sign (ep.subtypeCongr en) = sign ep * sign en := by
simp [subtypeCongr]
@[simp]
theorem sign_extendDomain (e : Perm α) {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
Equiv.Perm.sign (e.extendDomain f) = Equiv.Perm.sign e := by
simp only [Equiv.Perm.extendDomain, sign_subtypeCongr, sign_permCongr, sign_refl, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem sign_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : Equiv.Perm (Subtype p)) :
sign (ofSubtype f) = sign f :=
sign_extendDomain f (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
end congr
end SignType.sign
@[simp]
theorem viaFintypeEmbedding_sign
[Fintype α] [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : α ↪ β) :
sign (e.viaFintypeEmbedding f) = sign e := by
simp [viaFintypeEmbedding]
section Finset
variable [Fintype α]
/-- Permutations of a given sign. -/
| def ofSign (s : ℤˣ) : Finset (Perm α) := univ.filter (sign · = s)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Sign.lean | 608 | 609 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
| end Differentials
section Cocycles
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 233 | 235 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yourong Zang
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
/-! # Real differentiability of complex-differentiable functions
`HasDerivAt.real_of_complex` expresses that, if a function on `ℂ` is differentiable (over `ℂ`),
then its restriction to `ℝ` is differentiable over `ℝ`, with derivative the real part of the
complex derivative.
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
section RealDerivOfComplex
/-! ### Differentiability of the restriction to `ℝ` of complex functions -/
open Complex
variable {e : ℂ → ℂ} {e' : ℂ} {z : ℝ}
/-- If a complex function is differentiable at a real point, then the induced real function is also
differentiable at this point, with a derivative equal to the real part of the complex derivative. -/
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.real_of_complex (h : HasStrictDerivAt e e' z) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x : ℝ => (e x).re) e'.re z := by
have A : HasStrictFDerivAt ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) ofRealCLM z := ofRealCLM.hasStrictFDerivAt
have B :
HasStrictFDerivAt e ((ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight 1 e' : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).restrictScalars ℝ)
(ofRealCLM z) :=
h.hasStrictFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
have C : HasStrictFDerivAt re reCLM (e (ofRealCLM z)) := reCLM.hasStrictFDerivAt
simpa using (C.comp z (B.comp z A)).hasStrictDerivAt
/-- If a complex function `e` is differentiable at a real point, then the function `ℝ → ℝ` given by
the real part of `e` is also differentiable at this point, with a derivative equal to the real part
of the complex derivative. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.real_of_complex (h : HasDerivAt e e' z) :
HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ => (e x).re) e'.re z := by
have A : HasFDerivAt ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) ofRealCLM z := ofRealCLM.hasFDerivAt
have B :
HasFDerivAt e ((ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight 1 e' : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).restrictScalars ℝ)
(ofRealCLM z) :=
h.hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
have C : HasFDerivAt re reCLM (e (ofRealCLM z)) := reCLM.hasFDerivAt
simpa using (C.comp z (B.comp z A)).hasDerivAt
theorem ContDiffAt.real_of_complex {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (h : ContDiffAt ℂ n e z) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x : ℝ => (e x).re) z := by
have A : ContDiffAt ℝ n ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) z := ofRealCLM.contDiff.contDiffAt
have B : ContDiffAt ℝ n e z := h.restrict_scalars ℝ
have C : ContDiffAt ℝ n re (e z) := reCLM.contDiff.contDiffAt
exact C.comp z (B.comp z A)
theorem ContDiff.real_of_complex {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (h : ContDiff ℂ n e) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x : ℝ => (e x).re :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun _ => h.contDiffAt.real_of_complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.complexToReal_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {x : ℂ} {f' : E}
(h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (reCLM.smulRight f' + I • imCLM.smulRight f') x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight'] using
h.hasStrictFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
theorem HasDerivAt.complexToReal_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {x : ℂ} {f' : E} (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f (reCLM.smulRight f' + I • imCLM.smulRight f') x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight'] using h.hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.complexToReal_fderiv' {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} {x : ℂ} {f' : E}
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (reCLM.smulRight f' + I • imCLM.smulRight f') s x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight'] using
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.restrictScalars ℝ
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.complexToReal_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight] using h.hasStrictFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
theorem HasDerivAt.complexToReal_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight] using h.hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.complexToReal_fderiv {f : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' x : ℂ}
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) s x := by
simpa only [Complex.restrictScalars_one_smulRight] using h.hasFDerivWithinAt.restrictScalars ℝ
/-- If a complex function `e` is differentiable at a real point, then its restriction to `ℝ` is
differentiable there as a function `ℝ → ℂ`, with the same derivative. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (hf : HasDerivAt e e' ↑z) : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => e ↑y) e' z := by
simpa only [ofRealCLM_apply, ofReal_one, mul_one] using hf.comp z ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt
/-- If a function `f : ℝ → ℝ` is differentiable at a (real) point `x`, then it is also
differentiable as a function `ℝ → ℂ`. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.ofReal_comp {f : ℝ → ℝ} {u : ℝ} (hf : HasDerivAt f u z) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => ↑(f y) : ℝ → ℂ) u z := by
simpa only [ofRealCLM_apply, ofReal_one, real_smul, mul_one] using
ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt.scomp z hf
end RealDerivOfComplex
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/RealDeriv.lean | 123 | 125 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.DivisionPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ComputeDegree
/-!
# Division polynomials of Weierstrass curves
This file computes the leading terms of certain polynomials associated to division polynomials of
Weierstrass curves defined in `Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.DivisionPolynomial.Basic`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring `R`. By strong induction,
* `preΨₙ` has leading coefficient `n / 2` and degree `(n² - 4) / 2` if `n` is even,
* `preΨₙ` has leading coefficient `n` and degree `(n² - 1) / 2` if `n` is odd,
* `ΨSqₙ` has leading coefficient `n²` and degree `n² - 1`, and
* `Φₙ` has leading coefficient `1` and degree `n²`.
In particular, when `R` is an integral domain of characteristic different from `n`, the univariate
polynomials `preΨₙ`, `ΨSqₙ`, and `Φₙ` all have their expected leading terms.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_preΨ_le`: the degree bound `d` of `preΨₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.coeff_preΨ`: the `d`-th coefficient of `preΨₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_preΨ`: the degree of `preΨₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.leadingCoeff_preΨ`: the leading coefficient of `preΨₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_ΨSq_le`: the degree bound `d` of `ΨSqₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.coeff_ΨSq`: the `d`-th coefficient of `ΨSqₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_ΨSq`: the degree of `ΨSqₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.leadingCoeff_ΨSq`: the leading coefficient of `ΨSqₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_Φ_le`: the degree bound `d` of `Φₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.coeff_Φ`: the `d`-th coefficient of `Φₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.natDegree_Φ`: the degree of `Φₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.leadingCoeff_Φ`: the leading coefficient of `Φₙ` when `n ≠ 0`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, division polynomial, torsion point
-/
open Polynomial
universe u
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Ψ₂Sq
lemma natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le : W.Ψ₂Sq.natDegree ≤ 3 := by
rw [Ψ₂Sq]
compute_degree
@[simp]
lemma coeff_Ψ₂Sq : W.Ψ₂Sq.coeff 3 = 4 := by
rw [Ψ₂Sq]
compute_degree!
lemma coeff_Ψ₂Sq_ne_zero (h : (4 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₂Sq.coeff 3 ≠ 0 := by
rwa [coeff_Ψ₂Sq]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_Ψ₂Sq (h : (4 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₂Sq.natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le <| W.coeff_Ψ₂Sq_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_pos (h : (4 : R) ≠ 0) : 0 < W.Ψ₂Sq.natDegree :=
W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq h ▸ three_pos
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_Ψ₂Sq (h : (4 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₂Sq.leadingCoeff = 4 := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq h, coeff_Ψ₂Sq]
lemma Ψ₂Sq_ne_zero (h : (4 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₂Sq ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_pos h
end Ψ₂Sq
section Ψ₃
lemma natDegree_Ψ₃_le : W.Ψ₃.natDegree ≤ 4 := by
rw [Ψ₃]
compute_degree
@[simp]
lemma coeff_Ψ₃ : W.Ψ₃.coeff 4 = 3 := by
rw [Ψ₃]
compute_degree!
lemma coeff_Ψ₃_ne_zero (h : (3 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₃.coeff 4 ≠ 0 := by
rwa [coeff_Ψ₃]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_Ψ₃ (h : (3 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₃.natDegree = 4 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero W.natDegree_Ψ₃_le <| W.coeff_Ψ₃_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_Ψ₃_pos (h : (3 : R) ≠ 0) : 0 < W.Ψ₃.natDegree :=
W.natDegree_Ψ₃ h ▸ four_pos
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_Ψ₃ (h : (3 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₃.leadingCoeff = 3 := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_Ψ₃ h, coeff_Ψ₃]
lemma Ψ₃_ne_zero (h : (3 : R) ≠ 0) : W.Ψ₃ ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| W.natDegree_Ψ₃_pos h
end Ψ₃
section preΨ₄
lemma natDegree_preΨ₄_le : W.preΨ₄.natDegree ≤ 6 := by
rw [preΨ₄]
compute_degree
@[simp]
lemma coeff_preΨ₄ : W.preΨ₄.coeff 6 = 2 := by
rw [preΨ₄]
compute_degree!
lemma coeff_preΨ₄_ne_zero (h : (2 : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ₄.coeff 6 ≠ 0 := by
rwa [coeff_preΨ₄]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_preΨ₄ (h : (2 : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ₄.natDegree = 6 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero W.natDegree_preΨ₄_le <| W.coeff_preΨ₄_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_preΨ₄_pos (h : (2 : R) ≠ 0) : 0 < W.preΨ₄.natDegree := by
linarith only [W.natDegree_preΨ₄ h]
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_preΨ₄ (h : (2 : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ₄.leadingCoeff = 2 := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_preΨ₄ h, coeff_preΨ₄]
lemma preΨ₄_ne_zero (h : (2 : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ₄ ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| W.natDegree_preΨ₄_pos h
end preΨ₄
section preΨ'
private def expDegree (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2
private lemma expDegree_cast {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
2 * (expDegree n : ℤ) = n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1 := by
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases n with _ | n
· contradiction
push_cast [expDegree, show (2 * (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * n * (n + 2)) + 4 by ring1, even_two_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ two_pos]
ring1
· push_cast [expDegree, show (2 * n + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * n * (n + 1)) + 1 by ring1,
n.not_even_two_mul_add_one, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ two_pos]
ring1
private lemma expDegree_rec (m : ℕ) :
(expDegree (2 * (m + 3)) = 2 * expDegree (m + 2) + expDegree (m + 3) + expDegree (m + 5) ∧
expDegree (2 * (m + 3)) = expDegree (m + 1) + expDegree (m + 3) + 2 * expDegree (m + 4)) ∧
(expDegree (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
expDegree (m + 4) + 3 * expDegree (m + 2) + (if Even m then 2 * 3 else 0) ∧
expDegree (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
expDegree (m + 1) + 3 * expDegree (m + 3) + (if Even m then 0 else 2 * 3)) := by
push_cast [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, ← mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (b := (expDegree _ : ℤ)) two_pos,
mul_add, mul_left_comm (2 : ℤ)]
repeat rw [expDegree_cast <| by omega]
push_cast [Nat.even_add_one, ite_not, even_two_mul]
constructor <;> constructor <;> split_ifs <;> ring1
private def expCoeff (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
if Even n then n / 2 else n
private lemma expCoeff_cast (n : ℕ) : (expCoeff n : ℚ) = if Even n then (n / 2 : ℚ) else n := by
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ <;> simp [expCoeff, n.not_even_two_mul_add_one]
private lemma expCoeff_rec (m : ℕ) :
(expCoeff (2 * (m + 3)) =
expCoeff (m + 2) ^ 2 * expCoeff (m + 3) * expCoeff (m + 5) -
expCoeff (m + 1) * expCoeff (m + 3) * expCoeff (m + 4) ^ 2) ∧
(expCoeff (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
expCoeff (m + 4) * expCoeff (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 4 ^ 2 else 1) -
expCoeff (m + 1) * expCoeff (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else 4 ^ 2)) := by
push_cast [← @Int.cast_inj ℚ, expCoeff_cast, even_two_mul, m.not_even_two_mul_add_one,
Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
constructor <;> split_ifs <;> ring1
private lemma natDegree_coeff_preΨ' (n : ℕ) :
(W.preΨ' n).natDegree ≤ expDegree n ∧ (W.preΨ' n).coeff (expDegree n) = expCoeff n := by
let dm {m n p q} : _ → _ → (p * q : R[X]).natDegree ≤ m + n := natDegree_mul_le_of_le
let dp {m n p} : _ → (p ^ n : R[X]).natDegree ≤ n * m := natDegree_pow_le_of_le n
let cm {m n p q} : _ → _ → (p * q : R[X]).coeff (m + n) = _ := coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le
let cp {m n p} : _ → (p ^ m : R[X]).coeff (m * n) = _ := coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le
induction n using normEDSRec with
| zero => simpa only [preΨ'_zero] using ⟨natDegree_zero.le, Int.cast_zero.symm⟩
| one => simpa only [preΨ'_one] using ⟨natDegree_one.le, coeff_one_zero.trans Int.cast_one.symm⟩
| two => simpa only [preΨ'_two] using ⟨natDegree_one.le, coeff_one_zero.trans Int.cast_one.symm⟩
| three => simpa only [preΨ'_three] using ⟨W.natDegree_Ψ₃_le, W.coeff_Ψ₃ ▸ Int.cast_three.symm⟩
| four => simpa only [preΨ'_four] using ⟨W.natDegree_preΨ₄_le, W.coeff_preΨ₄ ▸ Int.cast_two.symm⟩
| even m h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ =>
constructor
· nth_rw 1 [preΨ'_even, ← max_self <| expDegree _, (expDegree_rec m).1.1, (expDegree_rec m).1.2]
exact natDegree_sub_le_of_le (dm (dm (dp h₂.1) h₃.1) h₅.1) (dm (dm h₁.1 h₃.1) (dp h₄.1))
· nth_rw 1 [preΨ'_even, coeff_sub, (expDegree_rec m).1.1, cm (dm (dp h₂.1) h₃.1) h₅.1,
cm (dp h₂.1) h₃.1, cp h₂.1, h₂.2, h₃.2, h₅.2, (expDegree_rec m).1.2,
cm (dm h₁.1 h₃.1) (dp h₄.1), cm h₁.1 h₃.1, h₁.2, cp h₄.1, h₃.2, h₄.2, (expCoeff_rec m).1]
norm_cast
| odd m h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ =>
rw [preΨ'_odd]
constructor
· nth_rw 1 [← max_self <| expDegree _, (expDegree_rec m).2.1, (expDegree_rec m).2.2]
refine natDegree_sub_le_of_le (dm (dm h₄.1 (dp h₂.1)) ?_) (dm (dm h₁.1 (dp h₃.1)) ?_)
all_goals split_ifs <;>
simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, dp W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
· nth_rw 1 [coeff_sub, (expDegree_rec m).2.1, cm (dm h₄.1 (dp h₂.1)), cm h₄.1 (dp h₂.1),
h₄.2, cp h₂.1, h₂.2, apply_ite₂ coeff, cp W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le, coeff_Ψ₂Sq, coeff_one_zero,
(expDegree_rec m).2.2, cm (dm h₁.1 (dp h₃.1)), cm h₁.1 (dp h₃.1), h₁.2, cp h₃.1, h₃.2,
apply_ite₂ coeff, cp W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le, coeff_one_zero, coeff_Ψ₂Sq, (expCoeff_rec m).2]
· norm_cast
all_goals split_ifs <;>
simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, dp W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
lemma natDegree_preΨ'_le (n : ℕ) : (W.preΨ' n).natDegree ≤ (n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2 :=
(W.natDegree_coeff_preΨ' n).left
@[simp]
lemma coeff_preΨ' (n : ℕ) : (W.preΨ' n).coeff ((n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2) =
if Even n then n / 2 else n := by
convert (W.natDegree_coeff_preΨ' n).right using 1
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ <;> simp [expCoeff, n.not_even_two_mul_add_one]
lemma coeff_preΨ'_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ' n).coeff ((n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2) ≠ 0 := by
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [coeff_preΨ', if_pos <| even_two_mul n, n.mul_div_cancel_left two_pos]
exact right_ne_zero_of_mul <| by rwa [← Nat.cast_mul]
· rwa [coeff_preΨ', if_neg n.not_even_two_mul_add_one]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_preΨ' {n : ℕ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ' n).natDegree = (n ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (W.natDegree_preΨ'_le n) <| W.coeff_preΨ'_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_preΨ'_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) : 0 < (W.preΨ' n).natDegree := by
simp only [W.natDegree_preΨ' h, Nat.div_pos_iff, zero_lt_two, true_and]
split_ifs <;>
exact Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop.trans <| Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.pow_le_pow_left hn 2) _
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_preΨ' {n : ℕ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ' n).leadingCoeff = if Even n then n / 2 else n := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_preΨ' h, coeff_preΨ']
lemma preΨ'_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {n : ℕ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ' n ≠ 0 := by
by_cases hn : 2 < n
· exact ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| W.natDegree_preΨ'_pos hn h
· rcases n with _ | _ | _ <;> aesop
end preΨ'
section preΨ
lemma natDegree_preΨ_le (n : ℤ) : (W.preΨ n).natDegree ≤
(n.natAbs ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact_mod_cast W.preΨ_ofNat n ▸ W.natDegree_preΨ'_le n
| neg ih => simp only [preΨ_neg, natDegree_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, even_neg, ih]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_preΨ (n : ℤ) : (W.preΨ n).coeff ((n.natAbs ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2) =
if Even n then n / 2 else n := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact_mod_cast W.preΨ_ofNat n ▸ W.coeff_preΨ' n
| neg ih n =>
simp only [preΨ_neg, coeff_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, even_neg]
rcases ih n, n.even_or_odd' with ⟨ih, ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩⟩ <;>
push_cast [even_two_mul, Int.not_even_two_mul_add_one, Int.neg_ediv_of_dvd ⟨n, rfl⟩] at * <;>
rw [ih]
lemma coeff_preΨ_ne_zero {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ n).coeff ((n.natAbs ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2) ≠ 0 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => simpa only [preΨ_ofNat, Int.even_coe_nat]
using W.coeff_preΨ'_ne_zero <| by exact_mod_cast h
| neg ih n => simpa only [preΨ_neg, coeff_neg, neg_ne_zero, Int.natAbs_neg, even_neg]
using ih n <| neg_ne_zero.mp <| by exact_mod_cast h
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_preΨ {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ n).natDegree = (n.natAbs ^ 2 - if Even n then 4 else 1) / 2 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (W.natDegree_preΨ_le n) <| W.coeff_preΨ_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_preΨ_pos {n : ℤ} (hn : 2 < n.natAbs) (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
0 < (W.preΨ n).natDegree := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => simpa only [preΨ_ofNat] using W.natDegree_preΨ'_pos hn <| by exact_mod_cast h
| neg ih n => simpa only [preΨ_neg, natDegree_neg]
using ih n (by rwa [← Int.natAbs_neg]) <| neg_ne_zero.mp <| by exact_mod_cast h
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_preΨ {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.preΨ n).leadingCoeff = if Even n then n / 2 else n := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_preΨ h, coeff_preΨ]
lemma preΨ_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) : W.preΨ n ≠ 0 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => simpa only [preΨ_ofNat] using W.preΨ'_ne_zero <| by exact_mod_cast h
| neg ih n => simpa only [preΨ_neg, neg_ne_zero]
using ih n <| neg_ne_zero.mp <| by exact_mod_cast h
end preΨ
section ΨSq
private lemma natDegree_coeff_ΨSq_ofNat (n : ℕ) :
(W.ΨSq n).natDegree ≤ n ^ 2 - 1 ∧ (W.ΨSq n).coeff (n ^ 2 - 1) = (n ^ 2 : ℤ) := by
let dp {m n p} : _ → (p ^ n : R[X]).natDegree ≤ n * m := natDegree_pow_le_of_le n
let h {n} := W.natDegree_coeff_preΨ' n
rcases n with _ | n
· simp
have hd : (n + 1) ^ 2 - 1 = 2 * expDegree (n + 1) + if Even (n + 1) then 3 else 0 := by
push_cast [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, add_sq, expDegree_cast (by omega : n + 1 ≠ 0)]
split_ifs <;> ring1
have hc : (n + 1 : ℕ) ^ 2 = expCoeff (n + 1) ^ 2 * if Even (n + 1) then 4 else 1 := by
push_cast [← @Int.cast_inj ℚ, expCoeff_cast]
split_ifs <;> ring1
rw [ΨSq_ofNat, hd]
constructor
· refine natDegree_mul_le_of_le (dp h.1) ?_
split_ifs <;> simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
· rw [coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le (dp h.1), coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le h.1, h.2, apply_ite₂ coeff,
coeff_Ψ₂Sq, coeff_one_zero, hc]
· norm_cast
split_ifs <;> simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
lemma natDegree_ΨSq_le (n : ℤ) : (W.ΨSq n).natDegree ≤ n.natAbs ^ 2 - 1 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact (W.natDegree_coeff_ΨSq_ofNat n).left
| neg ih => simp only [ΨSq_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, ih]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_ΨSq (n : ℤ) : (W.ΨSq n).coeff (n.natAbs ^ 2 - 1) = n ^ 2 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact_mod_cast (W.natDegree_coeff_ΨSq_ofNat n).right
| neg ih => simp_rw [ΨSq_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, ← Int.cast_pow, neg_sq, Int.cast_pow, ih]
lemma coeff_ΨSq_ne_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.ΨSq n).coeff (n.natAbs ^ 2 - 1) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [coeff_ΨSq, pow_ne_zero_iff two_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_ΨSq [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.ΨSq n).natDegree = n.natAbs ^ 2 - 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (W.natDegree_ΨSq_le n) <| W.coeff_ΨSq_ne_zero h
lemma natDegree_ΨSq_pos [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : ℤ} (hn : 1 < n.natAbs) (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
0 < (W.ΨSq n).natDegree := by
rwa [W.natDegree_ΨSq h, Nat.sub_pos_iff_lt, Nat.one_lt_pow_iff two_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma leadingCoeff_ΨSq [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) :
(W.ΨSq n).leadingCoeff = n ^ 2 := by
rw [leadingCoeff, W.natDegree_ΨSq h, coeff_ΨSq]
lemma ΨSq_ne_zero [NoZeroDivisors R] {n : ℤ} (h : (n : R) ≠ 0) : W.ΨSq n ≠ 0 := by
by_cases hn : 1 < n.natAbs
· exact ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| W.natDegree_ΨSq_pos hn h
· rcases hm : n.natAbs with _ | m
· push_cast [Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp hm, ne_self_iff_false] at h
· rcases Int.natAbs_eq_iff.mp hm with rfl | rfl <;>
rw [hm, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.not_lt_eq, Nat.le_zero] at hn <;>
push_cast [hn, ΨSq_neg, ΨSq_one] <;>
exact fun h' => h <| C_injective <| by push_cast [hn, C_neg, C_1, h', neg_zero, C_0]; rfl
end ΨSq
section Φ
private lemma natDegree_coeff_Φ_ofNat (n : ℕ) :
(W.Φ n).natDegree ≤ n ^ 2 ∧ (W.Φ n).coeff (n ^ 2) = 1 := by
let dm {m n p q} : _ → _ → (p * q : R[X]).natDegree ≤ m + n := natDegree_mul_le_of_le
let dp {m n p} : _ → (p ^ n : R[X]).natDegree ≤ n * m := natDegree_pow_le_of_le n
let cm {m n p q} : _ → _ → (p * q : R[X]).coeff (m + n) = _ := coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le
let h {n} := W.natDegree_coeff_preΨ' n
rcases n with _ | _ | n
· simp
· simp [natDegree_X_le]
have hd : (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 = 1 + 2 * expDegree (n + 2) + if Even (n + 1) then 0 else 3 := by
push_cast [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, expDegree_cast (by omega : n + 2 ≠ 0), Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> ring1
have hd' : (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 =
expDegree (n + 3) + expDegree (n + 1) + if Even (n + 1) then 3 else 0 := by
push_cast [← @Nat.cast_inj ℤ, ← mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (b := (_ ^ 2 : ℤ)) two_pos, mul_add,
expDegree_cast (by omega : n + 3 ≠ 0), expDegree_cast (by omega : n + 1 ≠ 0),
Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> ring1
have hc : (1 : ℤ) = 1 * expCoeff (n + 2) ^ 2 * (if Even (n + 1) then 1 else 4) -
expCoeff (n + 3) * expCoeff (n + 1) * (if Even (n + 1) then 4 else 1) := by
push_cast [← @Int.cast_inj ℚ, expCoeff_cast, Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> ring1
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Φ_ofNat]
constructor
· nth_rw 1 [← max_self <| (_ + _) ^ 2, hd, hd']
refine natDegree_sub_le_of_le (dm (dm natDegree_X_le (dp h.1)) ?_) (dm (dm h.1 h.1) ?_)
all_goals split_ifs <;> simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
· nth_rw 1 [coeff_sub, hd, hd', cm (dm natDegree_X_le (dp h.1)), cm natDegree_X_le (dp h.1),
coeff_X_one, coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le h.1, h.2, apply_ite₂ coeff, coeff_one_zero, coeff_Ψ₂Sq,
cm (dm h.1 h.1), cm h.1 h.1, h.2, h.2, apply_ite₂ coeff, coeff_one_zero, coeff_Ψ₂Sq]
conv_rhs => rw [← Int.cast_one, hc]
· norm_cast
all_goals split_ifs <;> simp only [apply_ite natDegree, natDegree_one.le, W.natDegree_Ψ₂Sq_le]
lemma natDegree_Φ_le (n : ℤ) : (W.Φ n).natDegree ≤ n.natAbs ^ 2 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact (W.natDegree_coeff_Φ_ofNat n).left
| neg ih => simp only [Φ_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, ih]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_Φ (n : ℤ) : (W.Φ n).coeff (n.natAbs ^ 2) = 1 := by
induction n using Int.negInduction with
| nat n => exact (W.natDegree_coeff_Φ_ofNat n).right
| neg ih => simp only [Φ_neg, Int.natAbs_neg, ih]
lemma coeff_Φ_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (n : ℤ) : (W.Φ n).coeff (n.natAbs ^ 2) ≠ 0 :=
W.coeff_Φ n ▸ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_Φ [Nontrivial R] (n : ℤ) : (W.Φ n).natDegree = n.natAbs ^ 2 :=
| natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (W.natDegree_Φ_le n) <| W.coeff_Φ_ne_zero n
lemma natDegree_Φ_pos [Nontrivial R] {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < (W.Φ n).natDegree := by
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/DivisionPolynomial/Degree.lean | 436 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Orientation
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Oriented two-dimensional real inner product spaces
This file defines constructions specific to the geometry of an oriented two-dimensional real inner
product space `E`.
## Main declarations
* `Orientation.areaForm`: an antisymmetric bilinear form `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` (usual notation `ω`).
Morally, when `ω` is evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram
they span. (But mathlib does not yet have a construction of oriented area, and in fact the
construction of oriented area should pass through `ω`.)
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`: an isometric automorphism `E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E` (usual notation `J`).
This automorphism squares to -1. In a later file, rotations (`Orientation.rotation`) are defined,
in such a way that this automorphism is equal to rotation by 90 degrees.
* `Orientation.basisRightAngleRotation`: for a nonzero vector `x` in `E`, the basis `![x, J x]`
for `E`.
* `Orientation.kahler`: a complex-valued real-bilinear map `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ`. Its real part is the
inner product and its imaginary part is `Orientation.areaForm`. For vectors `x` and `y` in `E`,
the complex number `o.kahler x y` has modulus `‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. In a later file, oriented angles
(`Orientation.oangle`) are defined, in such a way that the argument of `o.kahler x y` is the
oriented angle from `x` to `y`.
## Main results
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation`: the identity `J (J x) = - x`
* `Orientation.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay`: `x`, `y` are in the same ray, if
and only if `0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫` and `ω x y = 0`
* `Orientation.kahler_mul`: the identity `o.kahler x a * o.kahler a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * o.kahler x y`
* `Complex.areaForm`, `Complex.rightAngleRotation`, `Complex.kahler`: the concrete
interpretations of `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` for the oriented real inner
product space `ℂ`
* `Orientation.areaForm_map_complex`, `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map_complex`,
`Orientation.kahler_map_complex`: given an orientation-preserving isometry from `E` to `ℂ`,
expressions for `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` as the pullback of their concrete
interpretations on `ℂ`
## Implementation notes
Notation `ω` for `Orientation.areaForm` and `J` for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation` should be
defined locally in each file which uses them, since otherwise one would need a more cumbersome
notation which mentions the orientation explicitly (something like `ω[o]`). Write
```
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
```
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
open Module
lemma FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two {K V : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Fact (finrank K V = 2)] : FiniteDimensional K V :=
.of_fact_finrank_eq_succ 1
attribute [local instance] FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [Fact (finrank ℝ E = 2)]
(o : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 2))
namespace Orientation
/-- An antisymmetric bilinear form on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 (usual
notation `ω`). When evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram they
span. -/
irreducible_def areaForm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := by
let z : E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
let y : E [⋀^Fin 1]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E (E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ℝ z ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap
exact y ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap (R' := ℝ) o.volumeForm
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
theorem areaForm_to_volumeForm (x y : E) : ω x y = o.volumeForm ![x, y] := by simp [areaForm]
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_apply_self (x : E) : ω x x = 0 := by
rw [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
refine o.volumeForm.map_eq_zero_of_eq ![x, x] ?_ (?_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· simp
· norm_num
theorem areaForm_swap (x y : E) : ω x y = -ω y x := by
simp only [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
convert o.volumeForm.map_swap ![y, x] (_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
· norm_num
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_neg_orientation : (-o).areaForm = -o.areaForm := by
ext x y
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
/-- Continuous linear map version of `Orientation.areaForm`, useful for calculus. -/
def areaForm' : E →L[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
(↑(LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ) ∘ₗ o.areaForm)
@[simp]
theorem areaForm'_apply (x : E) :
o.areaForm' x = LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (o.areaForm x) :=
rfl
theorem abs_areaForm_le (x y : E) : |ω x y| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.abs_volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
theorem areaForm_le (x y : E) : ω x y ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
theorem abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal {x y : E} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) : |ω x y| = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [o.areaForm_to_volumeForm, o.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal]
· simp [Fin.prod_univ_succ]
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
· simp_all
· simpa using h
· simpa [real_inner_comm] using h
· simp_all
theorem areaForm_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x y : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).areaForm x y =
o.areaForm (φ.symm x) (φ.symm y) := by
have : φ.symm ∘ ![x, y] = ![φ.symm x, φ.symm y] := by
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm, volumeForm_map, this]
/-- The area form is invariant under pullback by a positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x y : E) :
o.areaForm (φ x) (φ y) = o.areaForm x y := by
convert o.areaForm_map φ (φ x) (φ y)
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
| rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
· simp
· simp
/-- Auxiliary construction for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`, rotation by 90 degrees in an
oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. -/
irreducible_def rightAngleRotationAux₁ : E →ₗ[ℝ] E :=
let to_dual : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/TwoDim.lean | 162 | 169 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Ineq
/-!
# Lemmas for `linarith`.
Those in the `Linarith` namespace should stay here.
Those outside the `Linarith` namespace may be deleted as they are ported to mathlib4.
-/
namespace Linarith
universe u
theorem lt_irrefl {α : Type u} [Preorder α] {a : α} : ¬a < a := _root_.lt_irrefl a
theorem eq_of_eq_of_eq {α} [Semiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b = 0 := by
simp [*]
section Semiring
variable {α : Type u} [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α]
theorem zero_lt_one [IsStrictOrderedRing α] : (0:α) < 1 :=
_root_.zero_lt_one
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 := by
simp [*]
| theorem le_of_le_of_eq {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by
simp [*]
| Mathlib/Tactic/Linarith/Lemmas.lean | 42 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdjoinRoot
/-!
# Bivariate polynomials
This file introduces the notation `R[X][Y]` for the polynomial ring `R[X][X]` in two variables,
and the notation `Y` for the second variable, in the `Polynomial.Bivariate` scope.
It also defines `Polynomial.evalEval` for the evaluation of a bivariate polynomial at a point
on the affine plane, which is a ring homomorphism (`Polynomial.evalEvalRingHom`), as well as
the abbreviation `CC` to view a constant in the base ring `R` as a bivariate polynomial.
-/
/-- The notation `Y` for `X` in the `Polynomial` scope. -/
scoped[Polynomial.Bivariate] notation3:max "Y" => Polynomial.X (R := Polynomial _)
/-- The notation `R[X][Y]` for `R[X][X]` in the `Polynomial` scope. -/
scoped[Polynomial.Bivariate] notation3:max R "[X][Y]" => Polynomial (Polynomial R)
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
namespace Polynomial
noncomputable section
variable {R S : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `evalEval x y p` is the evaluation `p(x,y)` of a two-variable polynomial `p : R[X][Y]`. -/
abbrev evalEval (x y : R) (p : R[X][Y]) : R := eval x (eval (C y) p)
/-- A constant viewed as a polynomial in two variables. -/
abbrev CC (r : R) : R[X][Y] := C (C r)
lemma evalEval_C (x y : R) (p : R[X]) : (C p).evalEval x y = p.eval x := by
| rw [evalEval, eval_C]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Bivariate.lean | 44 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
/-!
# Ordered modules as affine spaces
In this file we prove some theorems about `slope` and `lineMap` in the case when the module `E`
acting on the codomain `PE` of a function is an ordered module over its domain `k`. We also prove
inequalities that can be used to link convexity of a function on an interval to monotonicity of the
slope, see section docstring below for details.
## Implementation notes
We do not introduce the notion of ordered affine spaces (yet?). Instead, we prove various theorems
for an ordered module interpreted as an affine space.
## Tags
affine space, ordered module, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*}
/-!
### Monotonicity of `lineMap`
In this section we prove that `lineMap a b r` is monotone (strictly or not) in its arguments if
other arguments belong to specific domains.
-/
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring k] [PartialOrder k] [IsOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
variable {a a' b b' : E} {r r' : k}
theorem lineMap_mono_left (ha : a ≤ a') (hr : r ≤ 1) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_right (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left ha (sub_nonneg.2 hr)) _
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_left (ha : a < a') (hr : r < 1) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_lt_add_right (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left ha (sub_pos.2 hr)) _
omit [IsOrderedRing k] in
theorem lineMap_mono_right (hb : b ≤ b') (hr : 0 ≤ r) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a b' r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_left (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb hr) _
omit [IsOrderedRing k] in
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_right (hb : b < b') (hr : 0 < r) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a b' r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_lt_add_left (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb hr) _
theorem lineMap_mono_endpoints (ha : a ≤ a') (hb : b ≤ b') (h₀ : 0 ≤ r) (h₁ : r ≤ 1) :
lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b' r :=
(lineMap_mono_left ha h₁).trans (lineMap_mono_right hb h₀)
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_endpoints (ha : a < a') (hb : b < b') (h₀ : 0 ≤ r) (h₁ : r ≤ 1) :
lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b' r := by
rcases h₀.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h₀); · simpa
exact (lineMap_mono_left ha.le h₁).trans_lt (lineMap_strict_mono_right hb h₀)
theorem lineMap_lt_lineMap_iff_of_lt (h : r < r') : lineMap a b r < lineMap a b r' ↔ a < b := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
rw [← lt_sub_iff_add_lt, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_smul, ← sub_smul,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left (sub_pos.2 h)]
theorem left_lt_lineMap_iff_lt (h : 0 < r) : a < lineMap a b r ↔ a < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [lineMap_apply_zero]) (lineMap_lt_lineMap_iff_of_lt h)
theorem lineMap_lt_left_iff_lt (h : 0 < r) : lineMap a b r < a ↔ b < a :=
left_lt_lineMap_iff_lt (E := Eᵒᵈ) h
theorem lineMap_lt_right_iff_lt (h : r < 1) : lineMap a b r < b ↔ a < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [lineMap_apply_one]) (lineMap_lt_lineMap_iff_of_lt h)
theorem right_lt_lineMap_iff_lt (h : r < 1) : b < lineMap a b r ↔ b < a :=
lineMap_lt_right_iff_lt (E := Eᵒᵈ) h
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring k] [LinearOrder k] [IsStrictOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
[Invertible (2 : k)] {a a' b b' : E} {r r' : k}
theorem midpoint_le_midpoint (ha : a ≤ a') (hb : b ≤ b') : midpoint k a b ≤ midpoint k a' b' :=
lineMap_mono_endpoints ha hb (invOf_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) <| invOf_le_one one_le_two
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field k] [LinearOrder k] [IsStrictOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E]
variable [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
section
variable {a b : E} {r r' : k}
theorem lineMap_le_lineMap_iff_of_lt (h : r < r') : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a b r' ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add', ← sub_smul, ← sub_smul,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left (sub_pos.2 h)]
theorem left_le_lineMap_iff_le (h : 0 < r) : a ≤ lineMap a b r ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [lineMap_apply_zero]) (lineMap_le_lineMap_iff_of_lt h)
@[simp]
theorem left_le_midpoint : a ≤ midpoint k a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
left_le_lineMap_iff_le <| inv_pos.2 zero_lt_two
theorem lineMap_le_left_iff_le (h : 0 < r) : lineMap a b r ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
left_le_lineMap_iff_le (E := Eᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_le_left : midpoint k a b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
lineMap_le_left_iff_le <| inv_pos.2 zero_lt_two
theorem lineMap_le_right_iff_le (h : r < 1) : lineMap a b r ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [lineMap_apply_one]) (lineMap_le_lineMap_iff_of_lt h)
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_le_right : midpoint k a b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := lineMap_le_right_iff_le two_inv_lt_one
theorem right_le_lineMap_iff_le (h : r < 1) : b ≤ lineMap a b r ↔ b ≤ a :=
lineMap_le_right_iff_le (E := Eᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem right_le_midpoint : b ≤ midpoint k a b ↔ b ≤ a := right_le_lineMap_iff_le two_inv_lt_one
end
/-!
### Convexity and slope
Given an interval `[a, b]` and a point `c ∈ (a, b)`, `c = lineMap a b r`, there are a few ways to
say that the point `(c, f c)` is above/below the segment `[(a, f a), (b, f b)]`:
* compare `f c` to `lineMap (f a) (f b) r`;
* compare `slope f a c` to `slope f a b`;
* compare `slope f c b` to `slope f a b`;
* compare `slope f a c` to `slope f c b`.
In this section we prove equivalence of these four approaches. In order to make the statements more
readable, we introduce local notation `c = lineMap a b r`. Then we prove lemmas like
```
lemma map_le_lineMap_iff_slope_le_slope_left (h : 0 < r * (b - a)) :
f c ≤ lineMap (f a) (f b) r ↔ slope f a c ≤ slope f a b :=
```
For each inequality between `f c` and `lineMap (f a) (f b) r` we provide 3 lemmas:
* `*_left` relates it to an inequality on `slope f a c` and `slope f a b`;
* `*_right` relates it to an inequality on `slope f a b` and `slope f c b`;
* no-suffix version relates it to an inequality on `slope f a c` and `slope f c b`.
These inequalities can be used to restate `convexOn` in terms of monotonicity of the slope.
-/
variable {f : k → E} {a b r : k}
local notation "c" => lineMap a b r
section
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing k]
/-- Given `c = lineMap a b r`, `a < c`, the point `(c, f c)` is non-strictly below the
segment `[(a, f a), (b, f b)]` if and only if `slope f a c ≤ slope f a b`. -/
theorem map_le_lineMap_iff_slope_le_slope_left (h : 0 < r * (b - a)) :
f c ≤ lineMap (f a) (f b) r ↔ slope f a c ≤ slope f a b := by
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, slope, slope, vsub_eq_sub, vsub_eq_sub, vsub_eq_sub,
vadd_eq_add, vadd_eq_add, smul_eq_mul, add_sub_cancel_right, smul_sub, smul_sub, smul_sub,
sub_le_iff_le_add, mul_inv_rev, mul_smul, mul_smul, ← smul_sub, ← smul_sub, ← smul_add,
smul_smul, ← mul_inv_rev, inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos h, smul_smul,
mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (right_ne_zero_of_mul h.ne'), smul_add,
smul_inv_smul₀ (left_ne_zero_of_mul h.ne')]
/-- Given `c = lineMap a b r`, `a < c`, the point `(c, f c)` is non-strictly above the
segment `[(a, f a), (b, f b)]` if and only if `slope f a b ≤ slope f a c`. -/
theorem lineMap_le_map_iff_slope_le_slope_left (h : 0 < r * (b - a)) :
lineMap (f a) (f b) r ≤ f c ↔ slope f a b ≤ slope f a c :=
map_le_lineMap_iff_slope_le_slope_left (E := Eᵒᵈ) (f := f) (a := a) (b := b) (r := r) h
/-- Given `c = lineMap a b r`, `a < c`, the point `(c, f c)` is strictly below the
segment `[(a, f a), (b, f b)]` if and only if `slope f a c < slope f a b`. -/
theorem map_lt_lineMap_iff_slope_lt_slope_left (h : 0 < r * (b - a)) :
f c < lineMap (f a) (f b) r ↔ slope f a c < slope f a b :=
| lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (lineMap_le_map_iff_slope_le_slope_left h)
(map_le_lineMap_iff_slope_le_slope_left h)
/-- Given `c = lineMap a b r`, `a < c`, the point `(c, f c)` is strictly above the
segment `[(a, f a), (b, f b)]` if and only if `slope f a b < slope f a c`. -/
theorem lineMap_lt_map_iff_slope_lt_slope_left (h : 0 < r * (b - a)) :
lineMap (f a) (f b) r < f c ↔ slope f a b < slope f a c :=
map_lt_lineMap_iff_slope_lt_slope_left (E := Eᵒᵈ) (f := f) (a := a) (b := b) (r := r) h
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Ordered.lean | 206 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Spectrum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Rank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Hermitian
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
/-! # Spectral theory of hermitian matrices
This file proves the spectral theorem for matrices. The proof of the spectral theorem is based on
the spectral theorem for linear maps (`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis_apply_self_apply`).
## Tags
spectral theorem, diagonalization theorem -/
namespace Matrix
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
variable {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
namespace IsHermitian
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (hA : A.IsHermitian)
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, indexed by `Fin (Fintype.card n)` where `n` is the index
type of the matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues₀ : Fin (Fintype.card n) → ℝ :=
(isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).eigenvalues finrank_euclideanSpace
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, reusing the index `n` of the matrix entries. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues : n → ℝ := fun i =>
hA.eigenvalues₀ <| (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _)).symm i
/-- A choice of an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvectorBasis : OrthonormalBasis n 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) :=
((isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).eigenvectorBasis finrank_euclideanSpace).reindex
(Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _))
lemma mulVec_eigenvectorBasis (j : n) :
A *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) = (hA.eigenvalues j) • ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) := by
simpa only [eigenvectorBasis, OrthonormalBasis.reindex_apply, toEuclideanLin_apply,
RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul (K := 𝕜)] using
congr(⇑$((isHermitian_iff_isSymmetric.1 hA).apply_eigenvectorBasis
finrank_euclideanSpace ((Fintype.equivOfCardEq (Fintype.card_fin _)).symm j)))
/-- The spectrum of a Hermitian matrix `A` coincides with the spectrum of `toEuclideanLin A`. -/
theorem spectrum_toEuclideanLin : spectrum 𝕜 (toEuclideanLin A) = spectrum 𝕜 A :=
AlgEquiv.spectrum_eq (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv (PiLp.basisFun 2 𝕜 n)) _
/-- Eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix A are in the ℝ spectrum of A. -/
theorem eigenvalues_mem_spectrum_real (i : n) : hA.eigenvalues i ∈ spectrum ℝ A := by
apply spectrum.of_algebraMap_mem 𝕜
rw [← spectrum_toEuclideanLin]
exact LinearMap.IsSymmetric.hasEigenvalue_eigenvalues _ _ _ |>.mem_spectrum
/-- Unitary matrix whose columns are `Matrix.IsHermitian.eigenvectorBasis`. -/
noncomputable def eigenvectorUnitary {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*}
[Fintype n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} [DecidableEq n] (hA : Matrix.IsHermitian A) :
Matrix.unitaryGroup n 𝕜 :=
⟨(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis.toMatrix (hA.eigenvectorBasis).toBasis,
(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toMatrix_orthonormalBasis_mem_unitary (eigenvectorBasis hA)⟩
lemma eigenvectorUnitary_coe {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} [DecidableEq n] (hA : Matrix.IsHermitian A) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA =
(EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis.toMatrix (hA.eigenvectorBasis).toBasis :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_transpose_apply (j : n) :
(eigenvectorUnitary hA)ᵀ j = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_apply (i j : n) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA i j = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) i :=
rfl
theorem eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec (j : n) :
eigenvectorUnitary hA *ᵥ Pi.single j 1 = ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) := by
simp_rw [mulVec_single_one, eigenvectorUnitary_transpose_apply]
theorem star_eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec (j : n) :
(star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis j) = Pi.single j 1 := by
rw [← eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, unitary.coe_star_mul_self, one_mulVec]
/-- Unitary diagonalization of a Hermitian matrix. -/
theorem star_mul_self_mul_eq_diagonal :
(star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) * A * (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)
= diagonal (RCLike.ofReal ∘ hA.eigenvalues) := by
apply Matrix.toEuclideanLin.injective
apply Basis.ext (EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜).toBasis
intro i
simp only [toEuclideanLin_apply, OrthonormalBasis.coe_toBasis, EuclideanSpace.basisFun_apply,
WithLp.equiv_single, ← mulVec_mulVec, eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, ← mulVec_mulVec,
mulVec_eigenvectorBasis, Matrix.diagonal_mulVec_single, mulVec_smul,
star_eigenvectorUnitary_mulVec, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul (K := 𝕜), WithLp.equiv_symm_smul,
WithLp.equiv_symm_single, Function.comp_apply, mul_one, WithLp.equiv_symm_single]
apply PiLp.ext
intro j
simp only [PiLp.smul_apply, EuclideanSpace.single_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero]
/-- **Diagonalization theorem**, **spectral theorem** for matrices; A hermitian matrix can be
diagonalized by a change of basis. For the spectral theorem on linear maps, see
`LinearMap.IsSymmetric.eigenvectorBasis_apply_self_apply`. -/
theorem spectral_theorem :
A = (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜) * diagonal (RCLike.ofReal ∘ hA.eigenvalues)
* (star (eigenvectorUnitary hA : Matrix n n 𝕜)) := by
rw [← star_mul_self_mul_eq_diagonal, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
(Matrix.mem_unitaryGroup_iff).mp (eigenvectorUnitary hA).2, mul_one,
← mul_assoc, (Matrix.mem_unitaryGroup_iff).mp (eigenvectorUnitary hA).2, one_mul]
theorem eigenvalues_eq (i : n) :
(hA.eigenvalues i) = RCLike.re (dotProduct (star ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis i))
(A *ᵥ ⇑(hA.eigenvectorBasis i))) := by
rw [dotProduct_comm]
simp only [mulVec_eigenvectorBasis, smul_dotProduct, ← EuclideanSpace.inner_eq_star_dotProduct,
inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, RCLike.smul_re, hA.eigenvectorBasis.orthonormal.1 i,
mul_one, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow, RCLike.one_re]
/-- The determinant of a hermitian matrix is the product of its eigenvalues. -/
theorem det_eq_prod_eigenvalues : det A = ∏ i, (hA.eigenvalues i : 𝕜) := by
convert congr_arg det hA.spectral_theorem
rw [det_mul_right_comm]
simp
/-- rank of a hermitian matrix is the rank of after diagonalization by the eigenvector unitary -/
lemma rank_eq_rank_diagonal : A.rank = (Matrix.diagonal hA.eigenvalues).rank := by
conv_lhs => rw [hA.spectral_theorem, ← unitary.coe_star]
simp [-isUnit_iff_ne_zero, -unitary.coe_star, rank_diagonal]
|
/-- rank of a hermitian matrix is the number of nonzero eigenvalues of the hermitian matrix -/
lemma rank_eq_card_non_zero_eigs : A.rank = Fintype.card {i // hA.eigenvalues i ≠ 0} := by
rw [rank_eq_rank_diagonal hA, Matrix.rank_diagonal]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Spectrum.lean | 140 | 143 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,281 | 1,282 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
| (Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 264 | 265 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Gabriel Ebner, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Conditionally complete linear order structure on `ℕ`
In this file we
* define a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` structure on `ℕ`;
* prove a few lemmas about `iSup`/`iInf`/`Set.iUnion`/`Set.iInter` and natural numbers.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true, eq_self_iff_true, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
/-- This combines `Nat.iInf_of_empty` with `ciInf_const`. -/
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ _ : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by
classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_sInf {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < sInf s) : m ∉ s := by
classical
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h; apply not_mem_empty
| inr h => rw [Nat.sInf_def h] at hm; exact Nat.find_min h hm
protected theorem sInf_le {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨m, hm⟩ hm
| theorem nonempty_of_pos_sInf {s : Set ℕ} (h : 0 < sInf s) : s.Nonempty := by
by_contra contra
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at contra
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 86 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
/-! # The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes
In this file, we study the homotopy cofiber `HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber`
of a morphism `φ : F ⟶ G` of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. In this case,
we redefine it as `CochainComplex.mappingCone φ`. The API involves definitions
- `mappingCone.inl φ : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1)`,
- `mappingCone.inr φ : G ⟶ mappingCone φ`,
- `mappingCone.fst φ : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1` and
- `mappingCone.snd φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup ι] [One ι]
{F G : CochainComplex C ι} (φ : F ⟶ G)
instance [∀ p, HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X (p + 1)) (G.X p)] :
HasHomotopyCofiber φ where
hasBinaryBiproduct := by
rintro i _ rfl
infer_instance
end
variable {F G : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G)
variable [HasHomotopyCofiber φ]
/-- The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable def mappingCone := homotopyCofiber φ
namespace mappingCone
open HomComplex
/-- The left inclusion in the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `-1`. -/
noncomputable def inl : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.inlX φ p q (by dsimp; omega))
/-- The right inclusion in the mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def inr : G ⟶ mappingCone φ := homotopyCofiber.inr φ
/-- The first projection from the mapping cone, as a cocyle of degree `1`. -/
noncomputable def fst : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.fstX φ p q hpq)) 2 (by omega) (by
ext p _ rfl
simp [δ_v 1 2 (by omega) _ p (p + 2) (by omega) (p + 1) (p + 1) (by omega) rfl,
homotopyCofiber.d_fstX φ p (p + 1) (p + 2) rfl, mappingCone,
show Int.negOnePow 2 = 1 by rfl])
/-- The second projection from the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `0`. -/
noncomputable def snd : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0 :=
Cochain.ofHoms (homotopyCofiber.sndX φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : q + 1 = p) :
(inl φ).v p q (by rw [← hpq, add_neg_cancel_right]) ≫
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v q p hpq = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inl, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_snd_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q hpq ≫ (snd φ).v q q (add_zero q) = 0 := by
simp [inl, snd]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = 0 := by
simp [inr, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_snd_v (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inr, snd]
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst :
(inl φ).comp (fst φ).1 (neg_add_cancel 1) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F) := by
ext p
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) p (p-1) p rfl (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd :
(inl φ).comp (snd φ) (add_zero (-1)) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero (-1)) p q q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add 1) p p q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G) := by aesop_cat
/-! In order to obtain identities of cochains involving `inl`, `inr`, `fst` and `snd`,
it is often convenient to use an `ext` lemma, and use simp lemmas like `inl_v_f_fst_v`,
but it is sometimes possible to get identities of cochains by using rewrites of
identities of cochains like `inl_fst`. Then, similarly as in category theory,
if we associate the compositions of cochains to the right as much as possible,
it is also interesting to have `reassoc` variants of lemmas, like `inl_fst_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d) (he : 1 + d = e) :
(inl φ).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) (by rw [← he, neg_add_cancel_left]) = γ := by
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) (by omega) (by omega), inl_fst,
Cochain.id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d)
(he : 0 + d = e) (hf : -1 + e = f) :
(inl φ).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = d := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, inl_snd, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d)
(he : 1 + d = e) (hf : 0 + e = f) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = f := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_fst, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d) (he : 0 + d = e) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) (by simp only [← he, zero_add]) = γ := by
obtain rfl : d = e := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_snd, Cochain.id_comp]
lemma ext_to (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i}
(h₁ : f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij)
(h₂ : f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i)) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_to_X φ i j hij h₁ (by simpa [snd] using h₂)
lemma ext_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} (f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) :
f = g ↔ f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij ∧
f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_to φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} {f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A}
(h₁ : (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g)
(h₂ : (inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} (f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) :
f = g ↔ (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g ∧
(inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_from φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma decomp_to {i : ℤ} {A : C} (f : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) (j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
∃ (a : A ⟶ F.X j) (b : A ⟶ G.X i), f = a ≫ (inl φ).v j i (by omega) + b ≫ (inr φ).f i :=
⟨f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij, f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i),
by apply ext_to φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma decomp_from {j : ℤ} {A : C} (f : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) (i : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) :
∃ (a : F.X i ⟶ A) (b : G.X j ⟶ A),
f = (fst φ).1.v j i hij ≫ a + (snd φ).v j j (add_zero j) ≫ b :=
⟨(inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f, (inr φ).f j ≫ f,
by apply ext_from φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma ext_cochain_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K (mappingCone φ) i} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔ γ₁.comp (fst φ).1 hij = γ₂.comp (fst φ).1 hij ∧
γ₁.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) = γ₂.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_to_iff φ q (q + 1) rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ p (q + 1) (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ _ p q (q + 1) hpq rfl] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma ext_cochain_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) K j} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔
(inl φ).comp γ₁ (show _ = i by omega) = (inl φ).comp γ₂ (by omega) ∧
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₁ (zero_add j) =
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₂ (zero_add j) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_from_iff φ (p + 1) p rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ (p + 1) q (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q (by omega)
simp only [Cochain.comp_v (inl φ) _ _ (p + 1) p q (by omega) hpq] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma id :
(fst φ).1.comp (inl φ) (add_neg_cancel 1) +
(snd φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 _) := by
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff φ (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1)]
lemma id_X (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ (inl φ).v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ (inr φ).f p = 𝟙 ((mappingCone φ).X p) := by
simpa only [Cochain.add_v, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, id_f,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p q p hpq (by omega)]
using Cochain.congr_v (id φ) p p (add_zero p)
@[reassoc]
lemma inl_v_d (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + (-1) = j) (hik : k + (-1) = i) :
(inl φ).v i j hij ≫ (mappingCone φ).d j i =
φ.f i ≫ (inr φ).f i - F.d i k ≫ (inl φ).v _ _ hik := by
dsimp [mappingCone, inl, inr]
rw [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d φ j i k (by dsimp; omega) (by dsimp; omega)]
abel
@[reassoc]
lemma inr_f_d (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f n₁ ≫ (mappingCone φ).d n₁ n₂ = G.d n₁ n₂ ≫ (inr φ).f n₂ := by
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma d_fst_v (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) (hjk : j + 1 = k) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (fst φ).1.v j k hjk =
-(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ F.d j k := by
apply homotopyCofiber.d_fstX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_fst_v' (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d (i - 1) i ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij =
-(fst φ).1.v (i - 1) i (by omega) ≫ F.d i j :=
d_fst_v φ (i - 1) i j (by omega) hij
@[reassoc]
lemma d_snd_v (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (snd φ).v j j (add_zero _) =
(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ φ.f j + (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) ≫ G.d i j := by
dsimp [mappingCone, snd, fst]
simp only [Cochain.ofHoms_v]
apply homotopyCofiber.d_sndX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_snd_v' (n : ℤ) :
(mappingCone φ).d (n - 1) n ≫ (snd φ).v n n (add_zero n) =
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v (n - 1) n (by omega) ≫ φ.f n +
(snd φ).v (n - 1) (n - 1) (add_zero _) ≫ G.d (n - 1) n := by
apply d_snd_v
@[simp]
lemma δ_inl :
δ (-1) 0 (inl φ) = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ inr φ) := by
ext p
simp [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) (inl φ) p p (add_zero p) _ _ rfl rfl,
inl_v_d φ p (p - 1) (p + 1) (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma δ_snd :
δ 0 1 (snd φ) = -(fst φ).1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) := by
ext p q hpq
simp [d_snd_v φ p q hpq]
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def descCochain (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n) :
Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n :=
(fst φ).1.comp α (by rw [← h, add_comm]) + (snd φ).comp β (zero_add n)
variable (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n)
@[simp]
lemma inl_descCochain :
(inl φ).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (by omega) = α := by
simp [descCochain]
@[simp]
lemma inr_descCochain :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (zero_add n) = β := by
simp [descCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + (-1) = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + n = p₃) :
(inl φ).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ =
α.v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂, ← h, add_comm m, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left]) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show -1 + n = m by omega) p₁ p₂ p₃
(by omega) (by omega)] using
Cochain.congr_v (inl_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(inr φ).f p₁ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add n) p₁ p₁ p₂ (add_zero p₁) h₁₂, Cochain.ofHom_v]
using Cochain.congr_v (inr_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_descCochain (n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + 1 = n') :
δ n n' (descCochain φ α β h) =
(fst φ).1.comp (δ m n α +
n'.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β (zero_add n)) (by omega) +
(snd φ).comp (δ n n' β) (zero_add n') := by
dsimp only [descCochain]
simp only [δ_add, Cochain.comp_add, δ_comp (fst φ).1 α _ 2 n n' hn' (by omega) (by omega),
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, smul_zero, add_zero,
δ_comp (snd φ) β (zero_add n) 1 n' n' hn' (zero_add 1) hn', δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
smul_neg, Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, Cochain.comp_units_smul, ← hn',
Int.negOnePow_succ, Units.neg_smul, Cochain.comp_neg]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cocycle F K n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def descCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cocycle G K n)
(h : m + 1 = n) (eq : δ m n α = n.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β.1 (zero_add n)) :
Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n :=
Cocycle.mk (descCochain φ α β.1 h) (n + 1) rfl
(by simp [δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ rfl, eq, Int.negOnePow_succ])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `mappingCone φ ⟶ K` that is constructed
from a cochain `α : Cochain F K (-1)` and a morphism `β : G ⟶ K` such that
`δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)`. -/
noncomputable def desc (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K)
(eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)) : mappingCone φ ⟶ K :=
Cocycle.homOf (descCocycle φ α (Cocycle.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) (by simp [eq]))
variable (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K) (eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β))
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_desc :
Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq) = descCochain φ α (Cochain.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_desc_f (p q : ℤ) (h : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q h ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f q = α.v p q h := by
simp [desc]
lemma inl_desc :
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq)) (add_zero _) = α := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_desc_f (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f p = β.f p := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_desc : inr φ ≫ desc φ α β eq = β := by aesop_cat
lemma desc_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(desc φ α β eq).f p = (fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ α.v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ β.f p := by
simp [ext_from_iff _ _ _ hpq]
end
/-- Constructor for homotopies between morphisms from a mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def descHomotopy {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (f₁ f₂ : mappingCone φ ⟶ K)
(γ₁ : Cochain F K (-2)) (γ₂ : Cochain G K (-1))
(h₁ : (inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₁) (add_zero (-1)) =
δ (-2) (-1) γ₁ + (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp γ₂ (zero_add (-1)) +
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₂) (add_zero (-1)))
(h₂ : Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₁) = δ (-1) 0 γ₂ + Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₂)) :
Homotopy f₁ f₂ :=
(Cochain.equivHomotopy f₁ f₂).symm ⟨descCochain φ γ₁ γ₂ (by norm_num), by
simp only [Cochain.ofHom_comp] at h₂
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1), h₁, h₂]⟩
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def liftCochain (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m) :
Cochain K (mappingCone φ) n :=
α.comp (inl φ) (by omega) + β.comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero n)
variable (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_fst :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (fst φ).1 h = α := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_snd :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (snd φ) (add_zero n) = β := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_fst_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + 1 = p₃) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (fst φ).1.v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ = α.v p₁ p₃ (by omega) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ h p₁ p₂ p₃ h₁₂ h₂₃]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_fst φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_snd_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (snd φ).v p₂ p₂ (add_zero p₂) = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero n) p₁ p₂ p₂ h₁₂ (add_zero p₂)]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_snd φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_liftCochain (m' : ℤ) (hm' : m + 1 = m') :
δ n m (liftCochain φ α β h) = -(δ m m' α).comp (inl φ) (by omega) +
(δ n m β + α.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m)).comp
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero m) := by
dsimp only [liftCochain]
simp only [δ_add, δ_comp α (inl φ) _ m' _ _ h hm' (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_comp_zero_cochain _ _ _ h, δ_inl, Cochain.ofHom_comp,
Int.negOnePow_neg, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.neg_smul, one_smul,
δ_ofHom, Cochain.comp_zero, zero_add, Cochain.add_comp,
Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain K F m` (with `n + 1 = m`) and `β : Cocycle K G n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def liftCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cocycle K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
(eq : δ n m β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m) = 0) :
Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n :=
Cocycle.mk (liftCochain φ α β h) m h (by
simp only [δ_liftCochain φ α β h (m+1) rfl, eq,
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, neg_zero, add_zero])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (α : Cocycle K F 1) (β : Cochain K G 0)
(eq : δ 0 1 β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) = 0)
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `K ⟶ mappingCone φ` that is constructed
from a cocycle `α : Cochain K F 1` and a cochain `β : Cochain K G 0`
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
noncomputable def lift :
K ⟶ mappingCone φ :=
Cocycle.homOf (liftCocycle φ α β (zero_add 1) eq)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_lift :
| Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq) = liftCochain φ α β (zero_add 1) := by
simp only [lift, Cocycle.cochain_ofHom_homOf_eq_coe, liftCocycle_coe]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/MappingCone.lean | 480 | 481 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
| end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 875 | 880 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Rev
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
## Main declarations
There are three (main) ways to consider `Fin n` as a subtype of `Fin (n + 1)`, hence three (main)
ways to move between tuples of length `n` and of length `n + 1` by adding/removing an entry.
### Adding at the start
* `Fin.succ`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function for
all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `0` and for `i.succ` for all `i : Fin n`.
This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cons`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.cons a f : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the start. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ` and `a : α 0`. This is a special case of
`Fin.cases`.
* `Fin.tail`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.tail f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.tail f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ`.
### Adding at the end
* `Fin.castSucc`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.lastCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function
for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `last n` and for `i.castSucc` for all
`i : Fin n`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.snoc`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the end. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc` and `a : α (last n)`. This is a
special case of `Fin.lastCases`.
* `Fin.init`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.init f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.init f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc`.
### Adding in the middle
For a **pivot** `p : Fin (n + 1)`,
* `Fin.succAbove`: Send `i : Fin n` to
* `i : Fin (n + 1)` if `i < p`,
* `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)` if `p ≤ i`.
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a
function for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `p` and for `p.succAbove i`
for all `i : Fin n`.
* `Fin.insertNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.insertNth f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` in position `p`. In general, tuples can be
dependent functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (p.succAbove i)` and `a : α p`. This is a
special case of `Fin.succAboveCases`.
* `Fin.removeNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.removeNth p f : Fin n → α`
by forgetting the `p`-th value. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.removeNth f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (succAbove p i)`.
`p = 0` means we add at the start. `p = last n` means we add at the end.
### Miscellaneous
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Sort*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_of_ne h', update_of_ne this, cons_succ]
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the first element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.cons` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def consEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α 0 × (∀ i, α (succ i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := cons f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f 0, tail f)
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Sort*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => consCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail]
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
theorem comp_cons {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
theorem comp_tail {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
end Preorder
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
section Append
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
@[simp]
theorem append_left (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
@[simp]
theorem append_right (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
theorem append_right_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_left_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (i.cast (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
theorem append_castAdd_natAdd {f : Fin (m + n) → α} :
append (fun i ↦ f (castAdd n i)) (fun i ↦ f (natAdd m i)) = f := by
unfold append addCases
simp
end Append
section Repeat
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
def «repeat» (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (x.cast (Nat.zero_mul _)).elim0
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
theorem repeat_succ (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ Fin.cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
theorem repeat_rev (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (i : Fin n) (y : α i.castSucc) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α i.castSucc :=
q i.castSucc
theorem init_def {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.castSucc :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x i.castSucc = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {α : Sort*} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
lemma snoc_zero {α : Sort*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Sort*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α i.castSucc)
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (snoc_cast_add _ _)
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.castSucc y := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases with
| cast j => rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
| last => simp [Ne.symm]
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases <;> simp
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.snoc` is injective. -/
theorem snoc_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@snoc n α) := fun x y xₙ yₙ h ↦
⟨funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (castSucc i), by simpa using congr_fun h (last n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem snoc_inj {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc} {xₙ yₙ : α (last n)} :
snoc x xₙ = snoc y yₙ ↔ x = y ∧ xₙ = yₙ :=
snoc_injective2.eq_iff
theorem snoc_right_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) :
Function.Injective (snoc x) :=
snoc_injective2.right _
theorem snoc_left_injective (xₙ : α (last n)) : Function.Injective (snoc · xₙ) :=
snoc_injective2.left _
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp only [init, snoc, h, cast_eq, dite_true, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q := by
ext j
simp [init, Fin.ne_of_lt]
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_castSucc : init (update q i.castSucc y) = update (init q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [init]
· simp [init, h, castSucc_inj]
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Sort*} (q : Fin (n + 2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) := by
ext i
simp [tail, init, castSucc_fin_succ]
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Sort*} (a : β) (q : Fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (fun _ ↦ β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = 0
· simp [h, snoc, castLT]
set j := pred i h with ji
have : i = j.succ := by rw [ji, succ_pred]
rw [this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j.val < n
· set k := castLT j h' with jk
have : j = castSucc k := by rw [jk, castSucc_castLT]
rw [this, ← castSucc_fin_succ, snoc]
simp [pred, snoc, cons]
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last]
simp
theorem comp_snoc {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ snoc q y = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp [h, snoc, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the right is the same as `Fin.snoc`. -/
theorem append_right_eq_snoc {α : Sort*} {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) :
Fin.append x x₀ = Fin.snoc x (x₀ 0) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_left]
exact (@snoc_castSucc _ (fun _ => α) _ _ i).symm
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_right]
exact (@snoc_last _ (fun _ => α) _ _).symm
/-- `Fin.snoc` is the same as appending a one-tuple -/
theorem snoc_eq_append {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) :
snoc xs x = append xs (cons x Fin.elim0) :=
(append_right_eq_snoc xs (cons x Fin.elim0)).symm
theorem append_left_snoc {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs x) ys =
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons x ys) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..) := by
rw [snoc_eq_append, append_assoc, append_left_eq_cons, append_cast_right]; rfl
|
theorem append_right_cons {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (y : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons y ys) =
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs y) ys ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..).symm := by
rw [append_left_snoc]; rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 652 | 657 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
|
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 39 | 40 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
/-- `p ∧ q` occurs frequently along the product of two filters
iff both `p` and `q` occur frequently along the corresponding filters. -/
theorem frequently_prod_and {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x.1 ∧ q x.2) ↔ (∃ᶠ a in f, p a) ∧ ∃ᶠ b in g, q b := by
simp only [frequently_iff_neBot, ← prod_neBot, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
rfl
theorem tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (x ×ˢ y) z ↔ ∀ W ∈ z, ∃ U ∈ x, ∃ V ∈ y, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop]
theorem tendsto_prod_iff' {g' : Filter γ} {s : α → β × γ} :
Tendsto s f (g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).1) f g ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).2) f g' := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, tendsto_inf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem le_prod {f : Filter (α × β)} {g : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
(f ≤ g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto Prod.fst f g ∧ Tendsto Prod.snd f g' :=
tendsto_prod_iff'
end Prod
/-! ### Coproducts of filters -/
section Coprod
variable {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.coprod f g = f ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g := by
rw [prod_top, top_prod]
rfl
theorem mem_coprod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f.coprod g ↔ (∃ t₁ ∈ f, Prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ t₂ ∈ g, Prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem bot_coprod (l : Filter β) : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod l = comap Prod.snd l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_bot (l : Filter α) : l.coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = comap Prod.fst l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
theorem bot_coprod_bot : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := by simp
theorem compl_mem_coprod {s : Set (α × β)} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
sᶜ ∈ la.coprod lb ↔ (Prod.fst '' s)ᶜ ∈ la ∧ (Prod.snd '' s)ᶜ ∈ lb := by
simp only [Filter.coprod, mem_sup, compl_mem_comap]
@[mono]
theorem coprod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ≤ f₂.coprod g₂ :=
sup_le_sup (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
theorem coprod_neBot_iff : (f.coprod g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β ∨ Nonempty α ∧ g.NeBot := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_left [NeBot f] [Nonempty β] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_right [NeBot g] [Nonempty α] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
| theorem coprod_inf_prod_le (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ≤ f₁ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ g₁ := calc
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 474 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Quotients of semirings
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := Relation.EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : Relation.EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
simpa only [pow_succ, mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] using
congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h))
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
theorem mul_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ := by
show mul r _ _ = _
rw [mul_def]
rfl
theorem pow_quot {a} {n : ℕ} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ ^ n : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a ^ n)⟩ := by
show npow r _ _ = _
rw [npow_def]
theorem neg_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ := by
show neg r _ = _
rw [neg_def]
rfl
theorem sub_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a b} :
(⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ - ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a - b)⟩ := by
show sub r _ _ = _
rw [sub_def]
rfl
theorem smul_quot [Algebra S R] {n : S} {a : R} :
(n • ⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (n • a)⟩ := by
show smul r _ _ = _
rw [smul]
rfl
instance instIsScalarTower [CommSemiring T] [SMul S T] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun s t ⟨a⟩ => Quot.inductionOn a fun a' => by simp only [RingQuot.smul_quot, smul_assoc]⟩
instance instSMulCommClass [CommSemiring T] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R] [SMulCommClass S T R] :
SMulCommClass S T (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun s t ⟨a⟩ => Quot.inductionOn a fun a' => by simp only [RingQuot.smul_quot, smul_comm]⟩
instance instAddCommMonoid (r : R → R → Prop) : AddCommMonoid (RingQuot r) where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_assoc := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [add_quot, add_assoc]
zero_add := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [add_quot, ← zero_quot, zero_add]
add_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [add_quot, ← zero_quot, add_zero]
add_comm := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [add_quot, add_comm]
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [smul_quot, zero_smul, zero_quot]
nsmul_succ := by
rintro n ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [smul_quot, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul,
add_comm, add_quot]
instance instMonoidWithZero (r : R → R → Prop) : MonoidWithZero (RingQuot r) where
mul_assoc := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, mul_assoc]
one_mul := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, ← one_quot, one_mul]
mul_one := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, ← one_quot, mul_one]
zero_mul := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, ← zero_quot, zero_mul]
mul_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, ← zero_quot, mul_zero]
npow n x := x ^ n
npow_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [pow_quot, ← one_quot, pow_zero]
npow_succ := by
rintro n ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [pow_quot, mul_quot, pow_succ]
instance instSemiring (r : R → R → Prop) : Semiring (RingQuot r) where
natCast := natCast r
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast, natCast, ← zero_quot]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, natCast, ← one_quot, add_quot]
left_distrib := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, add_quot, left_distrib]
right_distrib := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, add_quot, right_distrib]
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [smul_quot, zero_smul, zero_quot]
nsmul_succ := by
rintro n ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [smul_quot, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul,
add_comm, add_quot]
__ := instAddCommMonoid r
__ := instMonoidWithZero r
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℤ-algebras
private def intCast {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) (z : ℤ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ z⟩
instance instRing {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Ring (RingQuot r) :=
{ RingQuot.instSemiring r with
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [neg_quot, add_quot, ← zero_quot]
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [neg_quot, sub_quot, add_quot, sub_eq_add_neg]
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [smul_quot, ← zero_quot]
zsmul_succ' := by
rintro n ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [smul_quot, add_quot, add_mul, add_comm]
zsmul_neg' := by
rintro n ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [smul_quot, neg_quot, add_mul]
intCast := intCast r
intCast_ofNat := fun n => congrArg RingQuot.mk <| by
exact congrArg (Quot.mk _) (Int.cast_natCast _)
intCast_negSucc := fun n => congrArg RingQuot.mk <| by
simp_rw [neg_def]
exact congrArg (Quot.mk _) (Int.cast_negSucc n) }
instance instCommSemiring {R : Type uR} [CommSemiring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
CommSemiring (RingQuot r) :=
{ RingQuot.instSemiring r with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp [mul_quot, mul_comm] }
instance {R : Type uR} [CommRing R] (r : R → R → Prop) : CommRing (RingQuot r) :=
{ RingQuot.instCommSemiring r, RingQuot.instRing r with }
instance instInhabited (r : R → R → Prop) : Inhabited (RingQuot r) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAlgebra [Algebra S R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Algebra S (RingQuot r) where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap :=
{ toFun r := ⟨Quot.mk _ (algebraMap S R r)⟩
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot]
map_mul' := by simp [mul_quot]
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot]
map_add' := by simp [add_quot] }
commutes' r := by
rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩
simp [Algebra.commutes, mul_quot]
smul_def' r := by
rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩
simp [smul_quot, Algebra.smul_def, mul_quot]
/-- The quotient map from a ring to its quotient, as a homomorphism of rings.
-/
irreducible_def mkRingHom (r : R → R → Prop) : R →+* RingQuot r :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨Quot.mk _ x⟩
map_one' := by simp [← one_quot]
map_mul' := by simp [mul_quot]
map_zero' := by simp [← zero_quot]
map_add' := by simp [add_quot] }
theorem mkRingHom_rel {r : R → R → Prop} {x y : R} (w : r x y) : mkRingHom r x = mkRingHom r y := by
simp [mkRingHom_def, Quot.sound (Rel.of w)]
theorem mkRingHom_surjective (r : R → R → Prop) : Function.Surjective (mkRingHom r) := by
simp only [mkRingHom_def, RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk]
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringQuot_ext [NonAssocSemiring T] {r : R → R → Prop} (f g : RingQuot r →+* T)
(w : f.comp (mkRingHom r) = g.comp (mkRingHom r)) : f = g := by
ext x
rcases mkRingHom_surjective r x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact (RingHom.congr_fun w x :)
variable [Semiring T]
irreducible_def preLift {r : R → R → Prop} {f : R →+* T} (h : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y) :
RingQuot r →+* T :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ Quot.lift f
(by
rintro _ _ r
induction r with
| of r => exact h r
| add_left _ r' => rw [map_add, map_add, r']
| mul_left _ r' => rw [map_mul, map_mul, r']
| mul_right _ r' => rw [map_mul, map_mul, r'])
x.toQuot
map_zero' := by simp only [← zero_quot, f.map_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩
simp only [add_quot, f.map_add x y]
map_one' := by simp only [← one_quot, f.map_one]
map_mul' := by
rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, f.map_mul x y] }
/-- Any ring homomorphism `f : R →+* T` which respects a relation `r : R → R → Prop`
factors uniquely through a morphism `RingQuot r →+* T`.
-/
irreducible_def lift {r : R → R → Prop} :
{ f : R →+* T // ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y } ≃ (RingQuot r →+* T) :=
{ toFun := fun f ↦ preLift f.prop
invFun := fun F ↦ ⟨F.comp (mkRingHom r), fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg F (mkRingHom_rel h)⟩
left_inv := fun f ↦ by
ext
simp only [preLift_def, mkRingHom_def, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk,
OneHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply]
right_inv := fun F ↦ by
simp only [preLift_def]
ext
simp only [mkRingHom_def, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk,
Function.comp_apply, forall_const] }
@[simp]
theorem lift_mkRingHom_apply (f : R →+* T) {r : R → R → Prop} (w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y) (x) :
lift ⟨f, w⟩ (mkRingHom r x) = f x := by
simp_rw [lift_def, preLift_def, mkRingHom_def]
rfl
-- note this is essentially `lift.symm_apply_eq.mp h`
theorem lift_unique (f : R →+* T) {r : R → R → Prop} (w : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → f x = f y)
(g : RingQuot r →+* T) (h : g.comp (mkRingHom r) = f) : g = lift ⟨f, w⟩ := by
ext
simp [h]
theorem eq_lift_comp_mkRingHom {r : R → R → Prop} (f : RingQuot r →+* T) :
f = lift ⟨f.comp (mkRingHom r), fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg f (mkRingHom_rel h)⟩ := by
conv_lhs => rw [← lift.apply_symm_apply f]
rw [lift_def]
rfl
section CommRing
/-!
We now verify that in the case of a commutative ring, the `RingQuot` construction
agrees with the quotient by the appropriate ideal.
-/
variable {B : Type uR} [CommRing B]
/-- The universal ring homomorphism from `RingQuot r` to `B ⧸ Ideal.ofRel r`. -/
def ringQuotToIdealQuotient (r : B → B → Prop) : RingQuot r →+* B ⧸ Ideal.ofRel r :=
lift ⟨Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.ofRel r),
fun x y h ↦ Ideal.Quotient.eq.2 <| Submodule.mem_sInf.mpr
fun _ w ↦ w ⟨x, y, h, sub_add_cancel x y⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ringQuotToIdealQuotient_apply (r : B → B → Prop) (x : B) :
ringQuotToIdealQuotient r (mkRingHom r x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.ofRel r) x := by
simp_rw [ringQuotToIdealQuotient, lift_def, preLift_def, mkRingHom_def]
rfl
/-- The universal ring homomorphism from `B ⧸ Ideal.ofRel r` to `RingQuot r`. -/
def idealQuotientToRingQuot (r : B → B → Prop) : B ⧸ Ideal.ofRel r →+* RingQuot r :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift (Ideal.ofRel r) (mkRingHom r)
(by
refine fun x h ↦ Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ h
· rintro y ⟨a, b, h, su⟩
symm at su
rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at su
rw [← su, RingHom.map_sub, mkRingHom_rel h, sub_self]
· simp
· intro a b _ _ ha hb
simp [ha, hb]
· intro a x _ hx
simp [hx])
@[simp]
theorem idealQuotientToRingQuot_apply (r : B → B → Prop) (x : B) :
idealQuotientToRingQuot r (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ x) = mkRingHom r x :=
rfl
/-- The ring equivalence between `RingQuot r` and `(Ideal.ofRel r).quotient`
-/
def ringQuotEquivIdealQuotient (r : B → B → Prop) : RingQuot r ≃+* B ⧸ Ideal.ofRel r :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv (ringQuotToIdealQuotient r) (idealQuotientToRingQuot r)
(by
ext x
simp_rw [ringQuotToIdealQuotient, lift_def, preLift_def, mkRingHom_def]
change mkRingHom r x = _
rw [mkRingHom_def]
rfl)
(by
ext x
simp_rw [ringQuotToIdealQuotient, lift_def, preLift_def, mkRingHom_def]
change Quot.lift _ _ ((mkRingHom r) x).toQuot = _
rw [mkRingHom_def]
rfl)
end CommRing
section Algebra
variable (S)
/-- The quotient map from an `S`-algebra to its quotient, as a homomorphism of `S`-algebras.
-/
irreducible_def mkAlgHom (s : A → A → Prop) : A →ₐ[S] RingQuot s :=
{ mkRingHom s with
commutes' := fun _ ↦ by simp [mkRingHom_def]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mkAlgHom_coe (s : A → A → Prop) : (mkAlgHom S s : A →+* RingQuot s) = mkRingHom s := by
simp_rw [mkAlgHom_def, mkRingHom_def]
rfl
theorem mkAlgHom_rel {s : A → A → Prop} {x y : A} (w : s x y) :
mkAlgHom S s x = mkAlgHom S s y := by
simp [mkAlgHom_def, mkRingHom_def, Quot.sound (Rel.of w)]
theorem mkAlgHom_surjective (s : A → A → Prop) : Function.Surjective (mkAlgHom S s) := by
suffices Function.Surjective fun x ↦ (⟨.mk (Rel s) x⟩ : RingQuot s) by
simpa [mkAlgHom_def, mkRingHom_def]
rintro ⟨⟨a⟩⟩
use a
variable {B : Type u₄} [Semiring B] [Algebra S B]
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringQuot_ext' {s : A → A → Prop} (f g : RingQuot s →ₐ[S] B)
(w : f.comp (mkAlgHom S s) = g.comp (mkAlgHom S s)) : f = g := by
ext x
rcases mkAlgHom_surjective S s x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact AlgHom.congr_fun w x
irreducible_def preLiftAlgHom {s : A → A → Prop} {f : A →ₐ[S] B}
(h : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, s x y → f x = f y) : RingQuot s →ₐ[S] B :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ Quot.lift f
(by
rintro _ _ r
induction r with
| of r => exact h r
| add_left _ r' => simp only [map_add, r']
| mul_left _ r' => simp only [map_mul, r']
| mul_right _ r' => simp only [map_mul, r'])
x.toQuot
map_zero' := by simp only [← zero_quot, map_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩
simp only [add_quot, map_add _ x y]
map_one' := by simp only [← one_quot, map_one]
map_mul' := by
| rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y⟩⟩
simp only [mul_quot, map_mul _ x y]
commutes' := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 579 | 581 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
theorem mem_coclosedLindelof : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_iff, and_assoc]
theorem mem_coclosed_Lindelof' : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t := by
simp only [mem_coclosedLindelof, compl_subset_comm]
theorem coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof : coLindelof X ≤ coclosedLindelof X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
theorem IsLindeof.compl_mem_coclosedLindelof_of_isClosed (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
/-- X is a Lindelöf space iff every open cover has a countable subcover. -/
class LindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is a Lindelöf set. -/
isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.lindelofSpace [Subsingleton X] : LindelofSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isLindelof⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ_iff : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) ↔ LindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ [h : LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
h.isLindelof_univ
theorem cluster_point_of_Lindelof [LindelofSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f]
[CountableInterFilter f] : ∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by
simpa using isLindelof_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp)
theorem LindelofSpace.elim_nhds_subcover [LindelofSpace X] (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ := by
obtain ⟨t, tc, -, s⟩ := IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover isLindelof_univ U fun x _ => hU x
use t, tc
apply top_unique s
theorem lindelofSpace_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → ⋂ i, t i = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i = ∅) :
LindelofSpace X where
isLindelof_univ := isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed fun t => by simpa using h t
theorem IsClosed.isLindelof [LindelofSpace X] (h : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_univ.of_isClosed_subset h (subset_univ _)
/-- A compact set `s` is Lindelöf. -/
theorem IsCompact.isLindelof (hs : IsCompact s) :
IsLindelof s := by tauto
/-- A σ-compact set `s` is Lindelöf -/
theorem IsSigmaCompact.isLindelof (hs : IsSigmaCompact s) :
IsLindelof s := by
rw [IsSigmaCompact] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨K, ⟨hc, huniv⟩⟩
rw [← huniv]
have hl : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n) := fun n ↦ IsCompact.isLindelof (hc n)
exact isLindelof_iUnion hl
/-- A compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [CompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isCompact_univ.isLindelof}
/-- A sigma-compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [SigmaCompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isSigmaCompact_univ.isLindelof}
/-- `X` is a non-Lindelöf topological space if it is not a Lindelöf space. -/
class NonLindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a non-Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is not a Lindelöf set. -/
nonLindelof_univ : ¬IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
lemma nonLindelof_univ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [NonLindelofSpace X] :
¬IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
NonLindelofSpace.nonLindelof_univ
theorem IsLindelof.ne_univ [NonLindelofSpace X] (hs : IsLindelof s) : s ≠ univ := fun h ↦
nonLindelof_univ X (h ▸ hs)
instance [NonLindelofSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X) := by
refine hasBasis_coLindelof.neBot_iff.2 fun {s} hs => ?_
contrapose hs
rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, compl_empty_iff] at hs
rw [hs]
exact nonLindelof_univ X
@[simp]
theorem Filter.coLindelof_eq_bot [LindelofSpace X] : Filter.coLindelof X = ⊥ :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.eq_bot_iff.mpr ⟨Set.univ, isLindelof_univ, Set.compl_univ⟩
instance [NonLindelofSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coclosedLindelof X) :=
neBot_of_le coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof
theorem nonLindelofSpace_of_neBot (_ : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X)) : NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h' => (Filter.nonempty_of_mem h'.compl_mem_coLindelof).ne_empty compl_univ⟩
theorem Filter.coLindelof_neBot_iff : NeBot (Filter.coLindelof X) ↔ NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨nonLindelofSpace_of_neBot, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
theorem not_LindelofSpace_iff : ¬LindelofSpace X ↔ NonLindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h₁ => ⟨fun h₂ => h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩, fun ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ => h₁ h₂⟩
/-- A compact space `X` is Lindelöf. -/
instance (priority := 100) [CompactSpace X] : LindelofSpace X :=
{ isLindelof_univ := isCompact_univ.isLindelof}
theorem countable_of_Lindelof_of_discrete [LindelofSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : Countable X :=
countable_univ_iff.mp isLindelof_univ.countable_of_discrete
theorem countable_cover_nhds_interior [LindelofSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, interior (U x) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := isLindelof_univ.elim_countable_subcover (fun x => interior (U x))
(fun _ => isOpen_interior) fun x _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩
⟨t, ⟨ht.1, univ_subset_iff.1 ht.2⟩⟩
theorem countable_cover_nhds [LindelofSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := countable_cover_nhds_interior hU
⟨t, ⟨ht.1, univ_subset_iff.1 <| ht.2.symm.subset.trans <|
iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => interior_subset⟩⟩
/-- The comap of the coLindelöf filter on `Y` by a continuous function `f : X → Y` is less than or
equal to the coLindelöf filter on `X`.
This is a reformulation of the fact that images of Lindelöf sets are Lindelöf. -/
theorem Filter.comap_coLindelof_le {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
(Filter.coLindelof Y).comap f ≤ Filter.coLindelof X := by
rw [(hasBasis_coLindelof.comap f).le_basis_iff hasBasis_coLindelof]
intro t ht
refine ⟨f '' t, ht.image hf, ?_⟩
simpa using t.subset_preimage_image f
theorem isLindelof_range [LindelofSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (range f) := by rw [← image_univ]; exact isLindelof_univ.image hf
theorem isLindelof_diagonal [LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (diagonal X) :=
@range_diag X ▸ isLindelof_range (continuous_id.prodMk continuous_id)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is Lindelöf
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isLindelof_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun hs => hs.image hf.continuous, fun hs F F_ne_bot _ F_le => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, x_in : x ∈ s, rfl⟩, hx : ClusterPt (f x) (map f F)⟩ :=
hs ((map_mono F_le).trans_eq map_principal)
exact ⟨x, x_in, hf.mapClusterPt_iff.1 hx⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.isLindelof_iff := IsInducing.isLindelof_iff
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an embedding, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is Lindelöf
if and only if `s` is Lindelöf. -/
theorem Topology.IsEmbedding.isLindelof_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsEmbedding f) :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (f '' s) := hf.isInducing.isLindelof_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.isLindelof_iff := IsEmbedding.isLindelof_iff
/-- The preimage of a Lindelöf set under an inducing map is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isLindelof_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hf' : IsClosed (range f)) {K : Set Y} (hK : IsLindelof K) : IsLindelof (f ⁻¹' K) := by
replace hK := hK.inter_right hf'
rwa [hf.isLindelof_iff, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isLindelof_preimage := IsInducing.isLindelof_preimage
/-- The preimage of a Lindelöf set under a closed embedding is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.isLindelof_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f)
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsLindelof K) : IsLindelof (f ⁻¹' K) :=
hf.isInducing.isLindelof_preimage (hf.isClosed_range) hK
/-- A closed embedding is proper, ie, inverse images of Lindelöf sets are contained in Lindelöf.
Moreover, the preimage of a Lindelöf set is Lindelöf, see
`Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.isLindelof_preimage`. -/
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.tendsto_coLindelof {f : X → Y} (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) :
Tendsto f (Filter.coLindelof X) (Filter.coLindelof Y) :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun _K hK =>
(hf.isLindelof_preimage hK).compl_mem_coLindelof
/-- Sets of subtype are Lindelöf iff the image under a coercion is. -/
theorem Subtype.isLindelof_iff {p : X → Prop} {s : Set { x // p x }} :
IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof ((↑) '' s : Set X) :=
IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.isLindelof_iff
theorem isLindelof_iff_isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof s ↔ IsLindelof (univ : Set s) := by
rw [Subtype.isLindelof_iff, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem isLindelof_iff_LindelofSpace : IsLindelof s ↔ LindelofSpace s :=
isLindelof_iff_isLindelof_univ.trans isLindelof_univ_iff
lemma IsLindelof.of_coe [LindelofSpace s] : IsLindelof s := isLindelof_iff_LindelofSpace.mpr ‹_›
|
theorem IsLindelof.countable (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : DiscreteTopology s) : s.Countable :=
countable_coe_iff.mp
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 655 | 657 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
/-!
# Squares and even elements
This file defines square and even elements in a monoid.
## Main declarations
* `IsSquare a` means that there is some `r` such that `a = r * r`
* `Even a` means that there is some `r` such that `a = r + r`
## Note
* Many lemmas about `Even` / `IsSquare`, including important `simp` lemmas,
are in `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity`.
## TODO
* Try to generalize `IsSquare/Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas in
`Algebra.Ring.Parity` whose `Semiring` assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary.
* The "old" definition of `Even a` asked for the existence of an element `c` such that `a = 2 * c`.
For this reason, several fixes introduce an extra `two_mul` or `← two_mul`.
It might be the case that by making a careful choice of `simp` lemma, this can be avoided.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity` for the definition of odd elements as well as facts about
`Even` / `IsSquare` in rings.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul α]
/-- An element `a` of a type `α` with multiplication satisfies `IsSquare a` if `a = r * r`,
for some root `r : α`. -/
@[to_additive "An element `a` of a type `α` with addition satisfies `Even a` if `a = r + r`,
for some `r : α`."]
def IsSquare (a : α) : Prop := ∃ r, a = r * r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma IsSquare.mul_self (r : α) : IsSquare (r * r) := ⟨r, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isSquare_op_iff {a : α} : IsSquare (op a) ↔ IsSquare a :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ ↦ ⟨unop r, congr_arg unop hr⟩, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ ↦ ⟨op r, congr_arg op hr⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma isSquare_unop_iff {a : αᵐᵒᵖ} : IsSquare (unop a) ↔ IsSquare a := isSquare_op_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
instance [DecidablePred (IsSquare : α → Prop)] : DecidablePred (IsSquare : αᵐᵒᵖ → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ isSquare_unop_iff
@[simp]
lemma even_ofMul_iff {a : α} : Even (Additive.ofMul a) ↔ IsSquare a := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma isSquare_toMul_iff {a : Additive α} : IsSquare (a.toMul) ↔ Even a := Iff.rfl
instance Additive.instDecidablePredEven [DecidablePred (IsSquare : α → Prop)] :
DecidablePred (Even : Additive α → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ isSquare_toMul_iff
end Mul
section Add
variable [Add α]
@[simp] lemma isSquare_ofAdd_iff {a : α} : IsSquare (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) ↔ Even a := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma even_toAdd_iff {a : Multiplicative α} : Even a.toAdd ↔ IsSquare a := Iff.rfl
instance Multiplicative.instDecidablePredIsSquare [DecidablePred (Even : α → Prop)] :
DecidablePred (IsSquare : Multiplicative α → Prop) :=
fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ even_toAdd_iff
end Add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma IsSquare.one [MulOneClass α] : IsSquare (1 : α) := ⟨1, (mul_one _).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias isSquare_one := IsSquare.one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-27")] alias even_zero := Even.zero
section MonoidHom
| variable [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsSquare.map {a : α} (f : F) : IsSquare a → IsSquare (f a) :=
fun ⟨r, _⟩ => ⟨f r, by simp_all⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Even.lean | 100 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `Data.Matrix.Basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)` defined in
`Data.Fin.VecNotation`.
This also provides the new notation `!![a, b; c, d] = Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
This notation also works for empty matrices; `!![,,,] : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 3)` and
`!![;;;] : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 0)`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
This file provide notation `!![a, b; c, d]` for matrices, which corresponds to
`Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u uₘ uₙ uₒ
variable {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' : Type uₘ} {n' : Type uₙ} {o' : Type uₒ}
open Matrix
section toExpr
open Lean Qq
open Qq in
/-- `Matrix.mkLiteralQ !![a, b; c, d]` produces the term `q(!![$a, $b; $c, $d])`. -/
def mkLiteralQ {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {m n : Nat} (elems : Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) Q($α)) :
Q(Matrix (Fin $m) (Fin $n) $α) :=
let elems := PiFin.mkLiteralQ (α := q(Fin $n → $α)) fun i => PiFin.mkLiteralQ fun j => elems i j
q(Matrix.of $elems)
/-- Matrices can be reflected whenever their entries can. We insert a `Matrix.of` to
prevent immediate decay to a function. -/
protected instance toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToLevel.{uₘ}] [ToLevel.{uₙ}]
[Lean.ToExpr α] [Lean.ToExpr m'] [Lean.ToExpr n'] [Lean.ToExpr (m' → n' → α)] :
Lean.ToExpr (Matrix m' n' α) :=
have eα : Q(Type $(toLevel.{u})) := toTypeExpr α
have em' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₘ})) := toTypeExpr m'
have en' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₙ})) := toTypeExpr n'
{ toTypeExpr :=
q(Matrix $eα $em' $en')
toExpr := fun M =>
have eM : Q($em' → $en' → $eα) := toExpr (show m' → n' → α from M)
q(Matrix.of $eM) }
end toExpr
section Parser
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
/-- Notation for m×n matrices, aka `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α`.
For instance:
* `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is the matrix with two rows and three columns, of type
`Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 3) α`
* `!![a, b, c]` is a row vector of type `Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 3) α` (see also `Matrix.row`).
* `!![a; b; c]` is a column vector of type `Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 1) α` (see also `Matrix.col`).
This notation implements some special cases:
* `![,,]`, with `n` `,`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin n) α`
* `![;;]`, with `m` `;`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin 0) α`
* `![]` is the 0×0 matrix
Note that vector notation is provided elsewhere (by `Matrix.vecNotation`) as `![a, b, c]`.
Under the hood, `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is syntax for `Matrix.of ![![a, b, c], ![d, e, f]]`.
-/
syntax (name := matrixNotation)
"!![" ppRealGroup(sepBy1(ppGroup(term,+,?), ";", "; ", allowTrailingSep)) "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotationRx0) "!![" ";"+ "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotation0xC) "!![" ","* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(!![$[$[$rows],*];*]) => do
let m := rows.size
let n := if h : 0 < m then rows[0].size else 0
let rowVecs ← rows.mapM fun row : Array Term => do
unless row.size = n do
Macro.throwErrorAt (mkNullNode row) s!"\
Rows must be of equal length; this row has {row.size} items, \
the previous rows have {n}"
`(![$row,*])
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote m)) (Fin $(quote n)) _ ![$rowVecs,*])
| `(!![$[;%$semicolons]*]) => do
let emptyVec ← `(![])
let emptyVecs := semicolons.map (fun _ => emptyVec)
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote semicolons.size)) (Fin 0) _ ![$emptyVecs,*])
| `(!![$[,%$commas]*]) => `(@Matrix.of (Fin 0) (Fin $(quote commas.size)) _ ![])
/-- Delaborator for the `!![]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def delabMatrixNotation : Delab := whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
withOverApp 6 do
let mkApp3 (.const ``Matrix.of _) (.app (.const ``Fin _) em) (.app (.const ``Fin _) en) _ :=
(← getExpr).appFn!.appArg! | failure
let some m ← withNatValue em (pure ∘ some) | failure
let some n ← withNatValue en (pure ∘ some) | failure
withAppArg do
if m = 0 then
guard <| (← getExpr).isAppOfArity ``vecEmpty 1
let commas := .replicate n (mkAtom ",")
`(!![$[,%$commas]*])
else
if n = 0 then
let `(![$[![]%$evecs],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[;%$evecs]*])
else
let `(![$[![$[$melems],*]],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[$[$melems],*];*])
end Parser
variable (a b : ℕ)
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `Fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval !![1, 2; 3, 4] + !![3, 4; 5, 6] -- !![4, 6; 8, 10]
```
-/
instance repr [Repr α] : Repr (Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α) where
reprPrec f _p :=
(Std.Format.bracket "!![" · "]") <|
(Std.Format.joinSep · (";" ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange m).map fun i =>
Std.Format.fill <| -- wrap line in a single place rather than all at once
(Std.Format.joinSep · ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange n).map fun j => _root_.repr (f i j)
@[simp]
theorem cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : Fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vecCons v B i j = vecCons (v j) (fun i => B i j) i := by refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') : (vecHead fun i => B i j) = vecHead B j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
(vecTail fun i => B i j) = fun i => vecTail B i j := rfl
section DotProduct
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_empty (v w : Fin 0 → α) : dotProduct v w = 0 :=
Finset.sum_empty
@[simp]
theorem cons_dotProduct (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : Fin n.succ → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) w = x * vecHead w + dotProduct v (vecTail w) := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct v (vecCons x w) = vecHead v * x + dotProduct (vecTail v) w := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
theorem cons_dotProduct_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (y : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) (vecCons y w) = x * y + dotProduct v w := by simp
end DotProduct
section ColRow
variable {ι : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem replicateCol_empty (v : Fin 0 → α) : replicateCol ι v = vecEmpty :=
empty_eq _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_empty := replicateCol_empty
@[simp]
theorem replicateCol_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
replicateCol ι (vecCons x u) = of (vecCons (fun _ => x) (replicateCol ι u)) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [vecHead, vecTail]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_cons := replicateCol_cons
@[simp]
theorem replicateRow_empty : replicateRow ι (vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α) = of fun _ => vecEmpty := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias row_empty := replicateRow_empty
@[simp]
theorem replicateRow_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
replicateRow ι (vecCons x u) = of fun _ => vecCons x u :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias row_cons := replicateRow_cons
end ColRow
section Transpose
@[simp]
theorem transpose_empty_rows (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) : Aᵀ = of ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem transpose_empty_cols (A : Matrix (Fin 0) m' α) : Aᵀ = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_transpose (v : n' → α) (A : Matrix (Fin m) n' α) :
(of (vecCons v A))ᵀ = of fun i => vecCons (v i) (Aᵀ i) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ j <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head_transpose (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) :
vecHead (of.symm Aᵀ) = vecHead ∘ of.symm A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_transpose (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) : vecTail (of.symm Aᵀ) = (vecTail ∘ A)ᵀ := by
ext i j
rfl
end Transpose
section Mul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_mul [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin 0) n' α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) : A * B = of ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem empty_mul_empty (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) (B : Matrix (Fin 0) o' α) : A * B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_empty [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix m' n' α) (B : Matrix n' (Fin 0) α) :
A * B = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
theorem mul_val_succ [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin m.succ) n' α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) (i : Fin m)
(j : o') : (A * B) i.succ j = (of (vecTail (of.symm A)) * B) i j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_mul [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) :
of (vecCons v A) * B = of (vecCons (v ᵥ* B) (of.symm (of A * B))) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i
· rfl
simp [mul_val_succ]
end Mul
section VecMul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecMul (v : Fin 0 → α) (B : Matrix (Fin 0) o' α) : v ᵥ* B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecMul_empty [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (B : Matrix n' (Fin 0) α) : v ᵥ* B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecMul (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (B : Fin n.succ → o' → α) :
vecCons x v ᵥ* of B = x • vecHead B + v ᵥ* of (vecTail B) := by
ext i
simp [vecMul]
@[simp]
theorem vecMul_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (w : o' → α) (B : Fin n → o' → α) :
v ᵥ* of (vecCons w B) = vecHead v • w + vecTail v ᵥ* of B := by
ext i
simp [vecMul]
theorem cons_vecMul_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : o' → α) (B : Fin n → o' → α) :
vecCons x v ᵥ* of (vecCons w B) = x • w + v ᵥ* of B := by simp
end VecMul
section MulVec
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_mulVec [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin 0) n' α) (v : n' → α) : A *ᵥ v = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_empty (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) (v : Fin 0 → α) : A *ᵥ v = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_mulVec [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) (w : n' → α) :
(of <| vecCons v A) *ᵥ w = vecCons (dotProduct v w) (of A *ᵥ w) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [mulVec]
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_cons {α} [NonUnitalCommSemiring α] (A : m' → Fin n.succ → α) (x : α)
(v : Fin n → α) : (of A) *ᵥ (vecCons x v) = x • vecHead ∘ A + (of (vecTail ∘ A)) *ᵥ v := by
ext i
simp [mulVec, mul_comm]
end MulVec
section VecMulVec
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecMulVec (v : Fin 0 → α) (w : n' → α) : vecMulVec v w = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem vecMulVec_empty (v : m' → α) (w : Fin 0 → α) : vecMulVec v w = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecMulVec (x : α) (v : Fin m → α) (w : n' → α) :
vecMulVec (vecCons x v) w = vecCons (x • w) (vecMulVec v w) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [vecMulVec]
@[simp]
theorem vecMulVec_cons (v : m' → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
vecMulVec v (vecCons x w) = of fun i => v i • vecCons x w := rfl
end VecMulVec
section SMul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
theorem smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : Fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] :=
empty_eq _
theorem smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) :
x • vecCons v A = vecCons (x • v) (x • A) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
end SMul
section Submatrix
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_empty (A : Matrix m' n' α) (row : Fin 0 → m') (col : o' → n') :
submatrix A row col = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_cons_row (A : Matrix m' n' α) (i : m') (row : Fin m → m') (col : o' → n') :
submatrix A (vecCons i row) col = vecCons (fun j => A i (col j)) (submatrix A row col) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [submatrix]
/-- Updating a row then removing it is the same as removing it. -/
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_updateRow_succAbove (A : Matrix (Fin m.succ) n' α) (v : n' → α) (f : o' → n')
(i : Fin m.succ) : (A.updateRow i v).submatrix i.succAbove f = A.submatrix i.succAbove f :=
ext fun r s => (congr_fun (updateRow_ne (Fin.succAbove_ne i r) : _ = A _) (f s) :)
/-- Updating a column then removing it is the same as removing it. -/
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_updateCol_succAbove (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) (v : m' → α) (f : o' → m')
(i : Fin n.succ) : (A.updateCol i v).submatrix f i.succAbove = A.submatrix f i.succAbove :=
ext fun _r s => updateCol_ne (Fin.succAbove_ne i s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")]
alias submatrix_updateColumn_succAbove := submatrix_updateCol_succAbove
end Submatrix
section Vec2AndVec3
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
theorem one_fin_two : (1 : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) = !![1, 0; 0, 1] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem one_fin_three : (1 : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) = !![1, 0, 0; 0, 1, 0; 0, 0, 1] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
end One
section AddMonoidWithOne
variable [AddMonoidWithOne α]
theorem natCast_fin_two (n : ℕ) : (n : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) = !![↑n, 0; 0, ↑n] := by
| ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Notation.lean | 429 | 431 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
/-!
# Gaussian integral
We prove various versions of the formula for the Gaussian integral:
* `integral_gaussian`: for real `b` we have `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = √(π / b)`.
* `integral_gaussian_complex`: for complex `b` with `0 < re b` we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2)`.
* `integral_gaussian_Ioi` and `integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi`: variants for integrals over `Ioi 0`.
* `Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq`: the formula `Γ (1 / 2) = √π`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Real Topology
open Complex hiding exp abs_of_nonneg
theorem exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg {p b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (hp : 1 < p) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
suffices Tendsto (fun x => x * (b * x ^ (p - 1) + -1)) atTop atTop by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ this
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)) (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [rpow_sub_one hx.ne']
field_simp [hx.ne']
ring
apply tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop₀
refine tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop (-1 : ℝ) ?_
exact Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith))
theorem exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb one_lt_two
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg (s : ℝ) {b p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
apply ((isBigO_refl (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s) atTop).mul_isLittleO
(exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb hp)).trans
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO s
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg s one_lt_two hb
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) := by
obtain hp | hp := le_iff_lt_or_eq.mp hp
· have h_exp : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun x => exp (- x)) x := fun x => continuousAt_neg.rexp
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi zero_le_one, integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn ?_ ?_ isCompact_Icc
· refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow' hs
· intro x _
change ContinuousWithinAt ((fun x => exp (- x)) ∘ (fun x => x ^ p)) (Icc 0 1) x
refine ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt (h_exp _) ?_
exact continuousWithinAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr (le_of_lt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hp)))
· have h_rpow : ∀ (x r : ℝ), x ∈ Ici 1 → ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => x ^ r) (Ici 1) x := by
intro _ _ hx
refine continuousWithinAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inl ?_)
exact ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)
refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(ContinuousOn.mul (fun x hx => h_rpow x s hx) (fun x hx => ?_)) (IsLittleO.isBigO ?_)
· change ContinuousWithinAt ((fun x => exp (- x)) ∘ (fun x => x ^ p)) (Ici 1) x
exact ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt (h_exp _) (h_rpow x p hx)
· convert rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg s hp (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1) using 3
rw [neg_mul, one_mul]
· simp_rw [← hp, Real.rpow_one]
convert Real.GammaIntegral_convergent (by linarith : 0 < s + 1) using 2
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p s b : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hb : 0 < b) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) := by
have hib : 0 < b ^ (-p⁻¹) := rpow_pos_of_pos hb _
suffices IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ (b ^ (-p⁻¹)) ^ s * (x ^ s * exp (-x ^ p))) (Ioi 0) by
rw [show 0 = b ^ (-p⁻¹) * 0 by rw [mul_zero], ← integrableOn_Ioi_comp_mul_left_iff _ _ hib]
refine this.congr_fun (fun _ hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_rpow, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul (z := p), neg_mul, neg_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀,
rpow_neg_one, mul_inv_cancel_left₀]
all_goals linarith [mem_Ioi.mp hx]
refine Integrable.const_mul ?_ _
rw [← IntegrableOn]
exact integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hs hp
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) {s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2)) (Ioi 0) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow hs one_le_two hb
theorem integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) {s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
rw [← integrableOn_univ, ← @Iio_union_Ici _ _ (0 : ℝ), integrableOn_union,
integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi]
refine ⟨?_, integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb hs⟩
rw [← (Measure.measurePreserving_neg (volume : Measure ℝ)).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(Homeomorph.neg ℝ).measurableEmbedding]
simp only [Function.comp_def, neg_sq, neg_preimage, neg_Iio, neg_neg, neg_zero]
apply Integrable.mono' (integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb hs)
· apply Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
exact (measurable_id'.neg.pow measurable_const).mul
((measurable_id'.pow measurable_const).const_mul (-b)).exp
· have : MeasurableSet (Ioi (0 : ℝ)) := measurableSet_Ioi
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem this] with x hx
have h'x : 0 ≤ x := le_of_lt hx
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (exp_pos _).le
simpa [abs_of_nonneg h'x] using abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (-x) s
theorem integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
simpa using integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb (by norm_num : (-1 : ℝ) < 0)
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff {b : ℝ} :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) (Ioi 0) ↔ 0 < b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq h).integrableOn⟩
by_contra! hb
have : ∫⁻ _ : ℝ in Ioi 0, 1 ≤ ∫⁻ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ‖exp (-b * x ^ 2)‖₊ := by
apply lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ _)
simp only [neg_mul, ENNReal.one_le_coe_iff, ← toNNReal_one, toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, coe_nnnorm, one_le_exp_iff, Right.nonneg_neg_iff]
exact fun x ↦ mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hb (sq_nonneg x)
simpa using this.trans_lt h.2
theorem integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff {b : ℝ} :
(Integrable fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨fun h => integrableOn_Ioi_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff.mp h.integrableOn, integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq⟩
theorem integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x * exp (-b * x ^ 2) := by
simpa using integrable_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb (by norm_num : (-1 : ℝ) < 1)
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq (b : ℂ) (x : ℝ) :
‖Complex.exp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)‖ = exp (-b.re * x ^ 2) := by
rw [norm_exp, ← ofReal_pow, mul_comm (-b) _, re_ofReal_mul, neg_re, mul_comm]
theorem integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
refine ⟨(Complex.continuous_exp.comp
(continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2))).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq]
exact (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hb).2
theorem integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => ↑x * cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
refine ⟨(continuous_ofReal.mul (Complex.continuous_exp.comp ?_)).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
· exact continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2)
have := (integrable_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq hb).hasFiniteIntegral
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff] at this ⊢
convert this
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq b, norm_real, norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le]
theorem integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
∫ r : ℝ in Ioi 0, (r : ℂ) * cexp (-b * (r : ℂ) ^ 2) = (2 * b)⁻¹ := by
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re]
have A : ∀ x : ℂ, HasDerivAt (fun x => -(2 * b)⁻¹ * cexp (-b * x ^ 2))
(x * cexp (-b * x ^ 2)) x := by
intro x
convert ((hasDerivAt_pow 2 x).const_mul (-b)).cexp.const_mul (-(2 * b)⁻¹) using 1
field_simp [hb']
ring
have B : Tendsto (fun y : ℝ ↦ -(2 * b)⁻¹ * cexp (-b * (y : ℂ) ^ 2))
atTop (𝓝 (-(2 * b)⁻¹ * 0)) := by
refine Tendsto.const_mul _ (tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr ?_)
simp_rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq b]
exact tendsto_exp_atBot.comp
((tendsto_pow_atTop two_ne_zero).const_mul_atTop_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.2 hb))
convert integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ => (A ↑x).comp_ofReal)
(integrable_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb).integrableOn B using 1
simp only [mul_zero, ofReal_zero, zero_pow, Ne, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, reduceCtorEq]
/-- The *square* of the Gaussian integral `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2)` is equal to `π / b`. -/
theorem integral_gaussian_sq_complex {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < b.re) :
(∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) ^ 2 = π / b := by
/- We compute `(∫ exp (-b x^2))^2` as an integral over `ℝ^2`, and then make a polar change
of coordinates. We are left with `∫ r * exp (-b r^2)`, which has been computed in
`integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq` using the fact that this function has an obvious primitive. -/
calc
(∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) ^ 2 =
∫ p : ℝ × ℝ, cexp (-b * (p.1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * cexp (-b * (p.2 : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
rw [pow_two, ← integral_prod_mul]; rfl
_ = ∫ p : ℝ × ℝ, cexp (-b * ((p.1 : ℂ)^ 2 + (p.2 : ℂ) ^ 2)) := by
congr
ext1 p
rw [← Complex.exp_add, mul_add]
_ = ∫ p in polarCoord.target, p.1 •
cexp (-b * ((p.1 * Complex.cos p.2) ^ 2 + (p.1 * Complex.sin p.2) ^ 2)) := by
rw [← integral_comp_polarCoord_symm]
simp only [polarCoord_symm_apply, ofReal_mul, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin]
_ = (∫ r in Ioi (0 : ℝ), r * cexp (-b * (r : ℂ) ^ 2)) * ∫ θ in Ioo (-π) π, 1 := by
rw [← setIntegral_prod_mul]
congr with p : 1
rw [mul_one]
congr
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul ((p.1 : ℂ) ^ 2), ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq (p.2 : ℂ)]
ring
_ = ↑π / b := by
simp only [neg_mul, integral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, measureReal_restrict_apply,
univ_inter, real_smul, mul_one, ← neg_mul, integral_mul_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb]
rw [volume_real_Ioo_of_le (by linarith [pi_nonneg])]
field_simp [(by contrapose! hb; rw [hb, zero_re] : b ≠ 0)]
ring
theorem integral_gaussian (b : ℝ) : ∫ x : ℝ, exp (-b * x ^ 2) = √(π / b) := by
-- First we deal with the crazy case where `b ≤ 0`: then both sides vanish.
rcases le_or_lt b 0 with (hb | hb)
· rw [integral_undef, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
· exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos pi_pos.le hb
· simpa only [not_lt, integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq_iff] using hb
-- Assume now `b > 0`. Then both sides are non-negative and their squares agree.
refine (sq_eq_sq₀ (by positivity) (by positivity)).1 ?_
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_pow, ← coe_algebraMap, RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, ← integral_ofReal,
sq_sqrt (div_pos pi_pos hb).le, ← RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, coe_algebraMap, ofReal_div]
convert integral_gaussian_sq_complex (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (b : ℂ).re) with _ x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg]
theorem continuousAt_gaussian_integral (b : ℂ) (hb : 0 < re b) :
ContinuousAt (fun c : ℂ => ∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-c * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) b := by
let f : ℂ → ℝ → ℂ := fun (c : ℂ) (x : ℝ) => cexp (-c * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ := exists_between hb
have f_meas : ∀ c : ℂ, AEStronglyMeasurable (f c) volume := fun c => by
apply Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable
exact Complex.continuous_exp.comp (continuous_const.mul (continuous_ofReal.pow 2))
have f_cts : ∀ x : ℝ, ContinuousAt (fun c => f c x) b := fun x =>
(Complex.continuous_exp.comp (continuous_id'.neg.mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
have f_le_bd : ∀ᶠ c : ℂ in 𝓝 b, ∀ᵐ x : ℝ, ‖f c x‖ ≤ exp (-d * x ^ 2) := by
refine eventually_of_mem ((continuous_re.isOpen_preimage _ isOpen_Ioi).mem_nhds hd') ?_
intro c hc; filter_upwards with x
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq]
gcongr
exact le_of_lt hc
exact
continuousAt_of_dominated (Eventually.of_forall f_meas) f_le_bd (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq hd)
(ae_of_all _ f_cts)
theorem integral_gaussian_complex {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < re b) :
∫ x : ℝ, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) := by
have nv : ∀ {b : ℂ}, 0 < re b → b ≠ 0 := by intro b hb; contrapose! hb; rw [hb]; simp
apply
(convex_halfSpace_re_gt 0).isPreconnected.eq_of_sq_eq ?_ ?_ (fun c hc => ?_) (fun {c} hc => ?_)
(by simp : 0 < re (1 : ℂ)) ?_ hb
· -- integral is continuous
exact continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt continuousAt_gaussian_integral
· -- `(π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ)` is continuous
refine
continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun b hb =>
(continuousAt_cpow_const (Or.inl ?_)).comp (continuousAt_const.div continuousAt_id (nv hb))
rw [div_re, ofReal_im, ofReal_re, zero_mul, zero_div, add_zero]
exact div_pos (mul_pos pi_pos hb) (normSq_pos.mpr (nv hb))
· -- equality at 1
have : ∀ x : ℝ, cexp (-(1 : ℂ) * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = exp (-(1 : ℝ) * x ^ 2) := by
intro x
simp only [ofReal_exp, neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_neg, ofReal_pow]
simp_rw [this, ← coe_algebraMap, RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, integral_ofReal,
| ← RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal, coe_algebraMap]
conv_rhs =>
congr
· rw [← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_div]
· rw [← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_div]
rw [← ofReal_cpow, ofReal_inj]
· convert integral_gaussian (1 : ℝ) using 1
rw [sqrt_eq_rpow]
· rw [div_one]; exact pi_pos.le
· -- squares of both sides agree
dsimp only [Pi.pow_apply]
rw [integral_gaussian_sq_complex hc, sq]
conv_lhs => rw [← cpow_one (↑π / c)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (div_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero) (nv hc))]
norm_num
· -- RHS doesn't vanish
rw [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl (div_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero) (nv hc))
-- The Gaussian integral on the half-line, `∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-b * x^2)`, for complex `b`.
theorem integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi {b : ℂ} (hb : 0 < re b) :
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) / 2 := by
have full_integral := integral_gaussian_complex hb
have : MeasurableSet (Ioi (0 : ℝ)) := measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← integral_add_compl this (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb), compl_Ioi] at full_integral
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Iic 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) = ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) by
rw [this, ← mul_two] at full_integral
rwa [eq_div_iff]; exact two_ne_zero
have : ∀ c : ℝ, ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..c, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) =
∫ x in -c..0, cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2) := by
intro c
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_sub_left (a := 0) (b := c)
(fun x => cexp (-b * (x : ℂ) ^ 2)) 0
simpa [zero_sub, neg_sq, neg_zero] using this
have t1 :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq hb).integrableOn tendsto_id
have t2 :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/GaussianIntegral.lean | 272 | 308 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Complex
/-!
# Embeddings of number fields
This file defines the embeddings of a number field into an algebraic closed field.
## Main Definitions and Results
* `NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly`: let `x ∈ K` with `K` number field and
let `A` be an algebraic closed field of char. 0, then the images of `x` by the embeddings of `K`
in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`.
* `NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one`: an algebraic integer whose conjugates are
all of norm one is a root of unity.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace`: the type of infinite places of a number field `K`.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff`: two complex embeddings define the same infinite place iff
they are equal or complex conjugates.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm`: the infinite part of the product formula, that is
for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where the product is over the infinite place `w` and
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`.
## Tags
number field, embeddings, places, infinite places
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace NumberField.Embeddings
section Fintype
open Module
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
/-- There are finitely many embeddings of a number field. -/
noncomputable instance : Fintype (K →+* A) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (K →ₐ[ℚ] A) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm
variable [IsAlgClosed A]
/-- The number of embeddings of a number field is equal to its finrank. -/
theorem card : Fintype.card (K →+* A) = finrank ℚ K := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm, AlgHom.card]
instance : Nonempty (K →+* A) := by
rw [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, NumberField.Embeddings.card K A]
exact Module.finrank_pos
end Fintype
section Roots
open Set Polynomial
variable (K A : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [Field A] [Algebra ℚ A] [IsAlgClosed A] (x : K)
/-- Let `A` be an algebraically closed field and let `x ∈ K`, with `K` a number field.
The images of `x` by the embeddings of `K` in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of
the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`. -/
theorem range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly :
(range fun φ : K →+* A => φ x) = (minpoly ℚ x).rootSet A := by
convert (NumberField.isAlgebraic K).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly A x using 1
ext a
exact ⟨fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRatAlgHom, hφ⟩, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRingHom, hφ⟩⟩
end Roots
section Bounded
open Module Polynomial Set
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedField A] [IsAlgClosed A] [NormedAlgebra ℚ A]
theorem coeff_bdd_of_norm_le {B : ℝ} {x : K} (h : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B) (i : ℕ) :
‖(minpoly ℚ x).coeff i‖ ≤ max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2) := by
have hx := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral ℚ x
rw [← norm_algebraMap' A, ← coeff_map (algebraMap ℚ A)]
refine coeff_bdd_of_roots_le _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) (minpoly.natDegree_le x) (fun z hz => ?_) i
classical
rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hz
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly K A x).symm.subset hz
exact h φ
variable (K A)
/-- Let `B` be a real number. The set of algebraic integers in `K` whose conjugates are all
smaller in norm than `B` is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_norm_le (B : ℝ) : {x : K | IsIntegral ℤ x ∧ ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B}.Finite := by
classical
let C := Nat.ceil (max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2))
have := bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ K) (finrank ℚ K) (finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)
refine this.subset fun x hx => ?_; simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
have h_map_ℚ_minpoly := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx.1
refine ⟨_, ⟨?_, fun i => ?_⟩, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx.1, minpoly.aeval ℤ x⟩⟩
· rw [← (minpoly.monic hx.1).natDegree_map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ), ← h_map_ℚ_minpoly]
exact minpoly.natDegree_le x
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| coeff_bdd_of_norm_le hx.2 i).trans (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [h_map_ℚ_minpoly, coeff_map, eq_intCast, Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
/-- An algebraic integer whose conjugates are all of norm one is a root of unity. -/
theorem pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one {x : K} (hxi : IsIntegral ℤ x) (hx : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ = 1) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), x ^ n = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, habne, h⟩ :=
@Set.Infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo _ _ _ _ (x ^ · : ℕ → K) Set.infinite_univ
(by exact fun a _ => ⟨hxi.pow a, fun φ => by simp [hx φ]⟩) (finite_of_norm_le K A (1 : ℝ))
wlog hlt : b < a
· exact this K A hxi hx b a habne.symm h.symm (habne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
refine ⟨a - b, tsub_pos_of_lt hlt, ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le, pow_add, mul_left_eq_self₀] at h
refine h.resolve_right fun hp => ?_
specialize hx (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := ℚ)).toRingHom
rw [pow_eq_zero hp, map_zero, norm_zero] at hx; norm_num at hx
end Bounded
end NumberField.Embeddings
section Place
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {A : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing A] [Nontrivial A] (φ : K →+* A)
/-- An embedding into a normed division ring defines a place of `K` -/
def NumberField.place : AbsoluteValue K ℝ :=
(IsAbsoluteValue.toAbsoluteValue (norm : A → ℝ)).comp φ.injective
@[simp]
theorem NumberField.place_apply (x : K) : (NumberField.place φ) x = norm (φ x) := rfl
end Place
namespace NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
open Complex NumberField
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable (K) in
/--
A (random) lift of the complex embedding `φ : k →+* ℂ` to an extension `K` of `k`.
-/
noncomputable def lift [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := by
letI := φ.toAlgebra
exact (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := k)).toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_algebraMap [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) :
(lift K φ).comp (algebraMap k K) = φ := by
unfold lift
letI := φ.toAlgebra
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra']
@[simp]
theorem lift_algebraMap_apply [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) (x : k) :
lift K φ (algebraMap k K x) = φ x :=
RingHom.congr_fun (lift_comp_algebraMap φ) x
/-- The conjugate of a complex embedding as a complex embedding. -/
abbrev conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := star φ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_coe_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (conjugate φ) x = conj (φ x) := rfl
theorem place_conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : place (conjugate φ) = place φ := by
ext; simp only [place_apply, norm_conj, conjugate_coe_eq]
/-- An embedding into `ℂ` is real if it is fixed by complex conjugation. -/
abbrev IsReal (φ : K →+* ℂ) : Prop := IsSelfAdjoint φ
theorem isReal_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal φ ↔ conjugate φ = φ := isSelfAdjoint_iff
theorem isReal_conjugate_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal (conjugate φ) ↔ IsReal φ :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
/-- A real embedding as a ring homomorphism from `K` to `ℝ` . -/
def IsReal.embedding {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) : K →+* ℝ where
toFun x := (φ x).re
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_re]
map_mul' := by
simp only [Complex.conj_eq_iff_im.mp (RingHom.congr_fun hφ _), map_mul, mul_re,
mul_zero, tsub_zero, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, zero_re]
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, add_re, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem IsReal.coe_embedding_apply {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) (x : K) :
(hφ.embedding x : ℂ) = φ x := by
apply Complex.ext
· rfl
· rw [ofReal_im, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact RingHom.congr_fun hφ x
lemma IsReal.comp (f : k →+* K) {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) :
IsReal (φ.comp f) := by ext1 x; simpa using RingHom.congr_fun hφ (f x)
lemma isReal_comp_iff {f : k ≃+* K} {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (φ.comp (f : k →+* K)) ↔ IsReal φ :=
⟨fun H ↦ by convert H.comp f.symm.toRingHom; ext1; simp, IsReal.comp _⟩
lemma exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq [Algebra k K] [IsGalois k K] (φ ψ : K →+* ℂ)
(h : φ.comp (algebraMap k K) = ψ.comp (algebraMap k K)) :
∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, φ.comp σ.symm = ψ := by
letI := (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)).toAlgebra
letI := φ.toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower k K ℂ := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
let ψ' : K →ₐ[k] ℂ := { ψ with commutes' := fun r ↦ (RingHom.congr_fun h r).symm }
use (AlgHom.restrictNormal' ψ' K).symm
ext1 x
exact AlgHom.restrictNormal_commutes ψ' K x
variable [Algebra k K] (φ : K →+* ℂ) (σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K)
/--
`IsConj φ σ` states that `σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K` is the conjugation under the embedding `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
-/
def IsConj : Prop := conjugate φ = φ.comp σ
variable {φ σ}
lemma IsConj.eq (h : IsConj φ σ) (x) : φ (σ x) = star (φ x) := RingHom.congr_fun h.symm x
lemma IsConj.ext {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) (h₂ : IsConj φ σ₂) : σ₁ = σ₂ :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun x ↦ φ.injective ((h₁.eq x).trans (h₂.eq x).symm)
lemma IsConj.ext_iff {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) : σ₁ = σ₂ ↔ IsConj φ σ₂ :=
⟨fun e ↦ e ▸ h₁, h₁.ext⟩
lemma IsConj.isReal_comp (h : IsConj φ σ) : IsReal (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)) := by
ext1 x
simp only [conjugate_coe_eq, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ← h.eq,
starRingEnd_apply, AlgEquiv.commutes]
lemma isConj_one_iff : IsConj φ (1 : K ≃ₐ[k] K) ↔ IsReal φ := Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsReal.isConjGal_one⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.isConj_one_iff
lemma IsConj.symm (hσ : IsConj φ σ) :
IsConj φ σ.symm := RingHom.ext fun x ↦ by simpa using congr_arg star (hσ.eq (σ.symm x))
lemma isConj_symm : IsConj φ σ.symm ↔ IsConj φ σ :=
⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
end NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
section InfinitePlace
open NumberField
variable {k : Type*} [Field k] (K : Type*) [Field K] {F : Type*} [Field F]
/-- An infinite place of a number field `K` is a place associated to a complex embedding. -/
def NumberField.InfinitePlace := { w : AbsoluteValue K ℝ // ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, place φ = w }
instance [NumberField K] : Nonempty (NumberField.InfinitePlace K) := Set.instNonemptyRange _
variable {K}
/-- Return the infinite place defined by a complex embedding `φ`. -/
noncomputable def NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) : NumberField.InfinitePlace K :=
⟨place φ, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩
namespace NumberField.InfinitePlace
open NumberField
instance {K : Type*} [Field K] : FunLike (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
coe w x := w.1 x
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq (AbsoluteValue.ext fun x => congr_fun h x)
lemma coe_apply {K : Type*} [Field K] (v : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
v x = v.1 x := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {K : Type*} [Field K] (v₁ v₂ : InfinitePlace K) (h : ∀ k, v₁ k = v₂ k) : v₁ = v₂ :=
Subtype.ext <| AbsoluteValue.ext h
instance : MonoidWithZeroHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
map_mul w _ _ := w.1.map_mul _ _
map_one w := w.1.map_one
map_zero w := w.1.map_zero
instance : NonnegHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
apply_nonneg w _ := w.1.nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem apply (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (mk φ) x = ‖φ x‖ := rfl
/-- For an infinite place `w`, return an embedding `φ` such that `w = infinite_place φ` . -/
noncomputable def embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : K →+* ℂ := w.2.choose
@[simp]
theorem mk_embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : mk (embedding w) = w := Subtype.ext w.2.choose_spec
@[simp]
theorem mk_conjugate_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) : mk (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) = mk φ := by
refine DFunLike.ext _ _ (fun x => ?_)
rw [apply, apply, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq, Complex.norm_conj]
theorem norm_embedding_eq (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
‖(embedding w) x‖ = w x := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← mk_embedding w]
rfl
theorem eq_iff_eq (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x = r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ = r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
theorem le_iff_le (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x ≤ r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
theorem pos_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} {x : K} : 0 < w x ↔ x ≠ 0 := AbsoluteValue.pos_iff w.1
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_iff {φ ψ : K →+* ℂ} : mk φ = mk ψ ↔ φ = ψ ∨ ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ = ψ := by
constructor
· -- We prove that the map ψ ∘ φ⁻¹ between φ(K) and ℂ is uniform continuous, thus it is either the
-- inclusion or the complex conjugation using `Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj`
intro h₀
obtain ⟨j, hiφ⟩ := (φ.injective).hasLeftInverse
let ι := RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse hiφ
have hlip : LipschitzWith 1 (RingHom.comp ψ ι.symm.toRingHom) := by
change LipschitzWith 1 (ψ ∘ ι.symm)
apply LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul
intro x y
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, NormedField.dist_eq, Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply,
← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply le_of_eq
suffices ‖φ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ = ‖ψ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ by
rw [← this, ← RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse_apply hiφ _, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply ι _]
rfl
exact congrFun (congrArg (↑) h₀) _
cases
Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj φ.fieldRange hlip.uniformContinuous with
| inl h =>
left; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
| inr h =>
right; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
· rintro (⟨h⟩ | ⟨h⟩)
· exact congr_arg mk h
· rw [← mk_conjugate_eq]
exact congr_arg mk h
/-- An infinite place is real if it is defined by a real embedding. -/
def IsReal (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
/-- An infinite place is complex if it is defined by a complex (ie. not real) embedding. -/
def IsComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
theorem embedding_mk_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ ∨ embedding (mk φ) = ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ := by
rw [@eq_comm _ _ φ, @eq_comm _ _ (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ), ← mk_eq_iff, mk_embedding]
@[simp]
theorem embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ := by
have := embedding_mk_eq φ
rwa [ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp h, or_self] at this
theorem isReal_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsReal w ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ]
theorem isComplex_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsComplex w ↔ ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
contrapose! hφ
cases mk_eq_iff.mp (mk_embedding (mk φ)) with
| inl h => rwa [h] at hφ
| inr h => rwa [← ComplexEmbedding.isReal_conjugate_iff, h] at hφ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_embedding_eq_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) :
ComplexEmbedding.conjugate (embedding w) = embedding w :=
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mpr (isReal_iff.mp h)
@[simp]
theorem not_isReal_iff_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsReal w ↔ IsComplex w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff]
@[simp]
theorem not_isComplex_iff_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsComplex w ↔ IsReal w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff, not_not]
theorem isReal_or_isComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : IsReal w ∨ IsComplex w := by
rw [← not_isReal_iff_isComplex]; exact em _
theorem ne_of_isReal_isComplex {w w' : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) (h' : IsComplex w') :
w ≠ w' := fun h_eq ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr h' (h_eq ▸ h)
variable (K) in
theorem disjoint_isReal_isComplex :
Disjoint {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsReal w} {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsComplex w} :=
Set.disjoint_iff.2 <| fun _ hw ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.2 hw.2 hw.1
/-- The real embedding associated to a real infinite place. -/
noncomputable def embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) : K →+* ℝ :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.embedding (isReal_iff.mp hw)
@[simp]
theorem embedding_of_isReal_apply {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
((embedding_of_isReal hw) x : ℂ) = (embedding w) x :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.coe_embedding_apply (isReal_iff.mp hw) x
theorem norm_embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
‖embedding_of_isReal hw x‖ = w x := by
rw [← norm_embedding_eq, ← embedding_of_isReal_apply hw, Complex.norm_real]
@[simp]
theorem isReal_of_mk_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsReal (mk φ)) :
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by
contrapose! h
rw [not_isReal_iff_isComplex]
exact ⟨φ, h, rfl⟩
lemma isReal_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (mk φ) ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
⟨isReal_of_mk_isReal, fun H ↦ ⟨_, H, rfl⟩⟩
lemma isComplex_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsComplex (mk φ) ↔ ¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
not_isReal_iff_isComplex.symm.trans isReal_mk_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem not_isReal_of_mk_isComplex {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsComplex (mk φ)) :
¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by rwa [← isComplex_mk_iff]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of an infinite place, that is the number of distinct complex embeddings that
define it, see `card_filter_mk_eq`. -/
noncomputable def mult (w : InfinitePlace K) : ℕ := if (IsReal w) then 1 else 2
@[simp]
theorem mult_isReal (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
mult w.1 = 1 := by
rw [mult, if_pos w.prop]
@[simp]
theorem mult_isComplex (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
mult w.1 = 2 := by
rw [mult, if_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr w.prop)]
theorem mult_pos {w : InfinitePlace K} : 0 < mult w := by
rw [mult]
split_ifs <;> norm_num
@[simp]
theorem mult_ne_zero {w : InfinitePlace K} : mult w ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt mult_pos
theorem mult_coe_ne_zero {w : InfinitePlace K} : (mult w : ℝ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr mult_ne_zero
theorem one_le_mult {w : InfinitePlace K} : (1 : ℝ) ≤ mult w := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le]
exact mult_pos
open scoped Classical in
theorem card_filter_mk_eq [NumberField K] (w : InfinitePlace K) : #{φ | mk φ = w} = mult w := by
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; ext
rw [← mk_embedding w, mk_eq_iff, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate, star_involutive.eq_iff]
simp_rw [Finset.filter_or, Finset.filter_eq' _ (embedding w),
Finset.filter_eq' _ (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate (embedding w)),
Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, mult]
split_ifs with hw
· rw [ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp (isReal_iff.mp hw), Finset.union_idempotent,
Finset.card_singleton]
· refine Finset.card_pair ?_
rwa [Ne, eq_comm, ← ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff, ← isReal_iff]
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance NumberField.InfinitePlace.fintype [NumberField K] :
Fintype (InfinitePlace K) := Set.fintypeRange _
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_mul_prod {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] [NumberField K] (f : InfinitePlace K → α) :
∏ w, f w = (∏ w : {w // IsReal w}, f w.1) * (∏ w : {w // IsComplex w}, f w.1) := by
rw [← Equiv.prod_comp (Equiv.subtypeEquivRight (fun _ ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex))]
simp [Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype]
theorem sum_mult_eq [NumberField K] :
∑ w : InfinitePlace K, mult w = Module.finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [← Embeddings.card K ℂ, Fintype.card, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, ← Finset.univ.sum_fiberwise
(fun φ => InfinitePlace.mk φ)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl
(fun _ _ => by rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, card_filter_mk_eq])
/-- The map from real embeddings to real infinite places as an equiv -/
noncomputable def mkReal :
{ φ : K →+* ℂ // ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } ≃ { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } := by
refine (Equiv.ofBijective (fun φ => ⟨mk φ, ?_⟩) ⟨fun φ ψ h => ?_, fun w => ?_⟩)
· exact ⟨φ, φ.prop, rfl⟩
· rwa [Subtype.mk.injEq, mk_eq_iff, ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp φ.prop, or_self,
← Subtype.ext_iff] at h
· exact ⟨⟨embedding w, isReal_iff.mp w.prop⟩, by simp⟩
/-- The map from nonreal embeddings to complex infinite places -/
noncomputable def mkComplex :
{ φ : K →+* ℂ // ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } → { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } :=
Subtype.map mk fun φ hφ => ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mkReal_coe (φ : { φ : K →+* ℂ // ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ }) :
(mkReal φ : InfinitePlace K) = mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkComplex_coe (φ : { φ : K →+* ℂ // ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ }) :
(mkComplex φ : InfinitePlace K) = mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) := rfl
section NumberField
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The infinite part of the product formula : for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`. -/
theorem prod_eq_abs_norm (x : K) :
∏ w : InfinitePlace K, w x ^ mult w = abs (Algebra.norm ℚ x) := by
classical
convert (congr_arg (‖·‖) (@Algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings ℚ _ _ _ _ ℂ _ _ _ _ _ x)).symm
· rw [norm_prod, ← Fintype.prod_equiv RingHom.equivRatAlgHom (fun f => ‖f x‖)
(fun φ => ‖φ x‖) fun _ => by simp [RingHom.equivRatAlgHom_apply]]
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.univ mk (fun φ => ‖φ x‖)]
have (w : InfinitePlace K) (φ) (hφ : φ ∈ ({φ | mk φ = w} : Finset _)) :
‖φ x‖ = w x := by rw [← (Finset.mem_filter.mp hφ).2, apply]
simp_rw [Finset.prod_congr rfl (this _), Finset.prod_const, card_filter_mk_eq]
· rw [eq_ratCast, Rat.cast_abs, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← Complex.norm_real, Complex.ofReal_ratCast]
theorem one_le_of_lt_one {w : InfinitePlace K} {a : (𝓞 K)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ≠ w → z a < 1) : 1 ≤ w a := by
suffices (1 : ℝ) ≤ |Algebra.norm ℚ (a : K)| by
contrapose! this
rw [← InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm, ← Finset.prod_const_one]
refine Finset.prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty (fun _ _ ↦ ?_) (fun z _ ↦ ?_) Finset.univ_nonempty
· exact pow_pos (pos_iff.mpr ((Subalgebra.coe_eq_zero _).not.mpr ha)) _
· refine pow_lt_one₀ (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_ (by rw [mult]; split_ifs <;> norm_num)
by_cases hz : z = w
· rwa [hz]
· exact h hz
rw [← Algebra.coe_norm_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_abs, Rat.cast_intCast, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs (Algebra.norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha)
open scoped IntermediateField in
theorem _root_.NumberField.is_primitive_element_of_infinitePlace_lt {x : 𝓞 K}
{w : InfinitePlace K} (h₁ : x ≠ 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃w'⦄, w' ≠ w → w' x < 1)
(h₃ : IsReal w ∨ |(w.embedding x).re| < 1) : ℚ⟮(x : K)⟯ = ⊤ := by
rw [Field.primitive_element_iff_algHom_eq_of_eval ℚ ℂ ?_ _ w.embedding.toRatAlgHom]
· intro ψ hψ
have h : 1 ≤ w x := one_le_of_lt_one h₁ h₂
have main : w = InfinitePlace.mk ψ.toRingHom := by
simp at hψ
rw [← norm_embedding_eq, hψ] at h
contrapose! h
exact h₂ h.symm
rw [(mk_embedding w).symm, mk_eq_iff] at main
cases h₃ with
| inl hw =>
rw [conjugate_embedding_eq_of_isReal hw, or_self] at main
exact congr_arg RingHom.toRatAlgHom main
| inr hw =>
refine congr_arg RingHom.toRatAlgHom (main.resolve_right fun h' ↦ hw.not_le ?_)
have : (embedding w x).im = 0 := by
rw [← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
have := RingHom.congr_fun h' x
simp at this
rw [this]
exact hψ.symm
rwa [← norm_embedding_eq, ← Complex.re_add_im (embedding w x), this, Complex.ofReal_zero,
zero_mul, add_zero, Complex.norm_real] at h
· exact fun x ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain (minpoly ℚ x)
theorem _root_.NumberField.adjoin_eq_top_of_infinitePlace_lt {x : 𝓞 K} {w : InfinitePlace K}
(h₁ : x ≠ 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃w'⦄, w' ≠ w → w' x < 1) (h₃ : IsReal w ∨ |(w.embedding x).re| < 1) :
Algebra.adjoin ℚ {(x : K)} = ⊤ := by
rw [← IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral (IsIntegral.of_finite ℚ _)]
exact congr_arg IntermediateField.toSubalgebra <|
NumberField.is_primitive_element_of_infinitePlace_lt h₁ h₂ h₃
end NumberField
open Fintype Module
variable (K)
section NumberField
variable [NumberField K]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The number of infinite real places of the number field `K`. -/
noncomputable abbrev nrRealPlaces := card { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias NrRealPlaces := nrRealPlaces
open scoped Classical in
/-- The number of infinite complex places of the number field `K`. -/
noncomputable abbrev nrComplexPlaces := card { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias NrComplexPlaces := nrComplexPlaces
open scoped Classical in
theorem card_real_embeddings :
card { φ : K →+* ℂ // ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } = nrRealPlaces K := Fintype.card_congr mkReal
theorem card_eq_nrRealPlaces_add_nrComplexPlaces :
Fintype.card (InfinitePlace K) = nrRealPlaces K + nrComplexPlaces K := by
classical
convert Fintype.card_subtype_or_disjoint (IsReal (K := K)) (IsComplex (K := K))
(disjoint_isReal_isComplex K) using 1
exact (Fintype.card_of_subtype _ (fun w ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ isReal_or_isComplex w, fun _ ↦ by simp⟩)).symm
open scoped Classical in
theorem card_complex_embeddings :
card { φ : K →+* ℂ // ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } = 2 * nrComplexPlaces K := by
suffices ∀ w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w },
#{φ : {φ //¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ} | mkComplex φ = w} = 2 by
rw [Fintype.card, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, ← Finset.sum_fiberwise _ (fun φ => mkComplex φ)]
simp_rw [Finset.sum_const, this, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Fintype.card, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones,
Finset.mul_sum, Finset.sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rintro ⟨w, hw⟩
convert card_filter_mk_eq w
· rw [← Fintype.card_subtype, ← Fintype.card_subtype]
refine Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective ?_ ⟨fun _ _ h => ?_, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ?_⟩)
· exact fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.val, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff] at hφ⟩
· rwa [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← Subtype.ext_iff, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at h
· refine ⟨⟨⟨φ, not_isReal_of_mk_isComplex (hφ.symm ▸ hw)⟩, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, mkComplex_coe]
· simp_rw [mult, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw, ite_false]
theorem card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank :
nrRealPlaces K + 2 * nrComplexPlaces K = finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [← card_real_embeddings, ← card_complex_embeddings, Fintype.card_subtype_compl,
← Embeddings.card K ℂ, Nat.add_sub_of_le]
exact Fintype.card_subtype_le _
variable {K}
theorem nrComplexPlaces_eq_zero_of_finrank_eq_one (h : finrank ℚ K = 1) :
nrComplexPlaces K = 0 := by linarith [card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank K]
theorem nrRealPlaces_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_one (h : finrank ℚ K = 1) :
nrRealPlaces K = 1 := by
have := card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank K
rwa [nrComplexPlaces_eq_zero_of_finrank_eq_one h, h, mul_zero, add_zero] at this
theorem nrRealPlaces_pos_of_odd_finrank (h : Odd (finrank ℚ K)) :
0 < nrRealPlaces K := by
refine Nat.pos_of_ne_zero ?_
by_contra hc
refine (Nat.not_odd_iff_even.mpr ?_) h
rw [← card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank, hc, zero_add]
exact even_two_mul (nrComplexPlaces K)
/-- The restriction of an infinite place along an embedding. -/
def comap (w : InfinitePlace K) (f : k →+* K) : InfinitePlace k :=
⟨w.1.comp f.injective, w.embedding.comp f,
by { ext x; show _ = w.1 (f x); rw [← w.2.choose_spec]; rfl }⟩
end NumberField
variable {K}
@[simp]
lemma comap_mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) (f : k →+* K) : (mk φ).comap f = mk (φ.comp f) := rfl
lemma comap_id (w : InfinitePlace K) : w.comap (RingHom.id K) = w := rfl
lemma comap_comp (w : InfinitePlace K) (f : F →+* K) (g : k →+* F) :
w.comap (f.comp g) = (w.comap f).comap g := rfl
lemma comap_mk_lift [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) :
(mk (ComplexEmbedding.lift K φ)).comap (algebraMap k K) = mk φ := by simp
lemma IsReal.comap (f : k →+* K) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hφ : IsReal w) :
IsReal (w.comap f) := by
rw [← mk_embedding w, comap_mk, isReal_mk_iff]
rw [← mk_embedding w, isReal_mk_iff] at hφ
exact hφ.comp f
lemma isReal_comap_iff (f : k ≃+* K) {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsReal (w.comap (f : k →+* K)) ↔ IsReal w := by
rw [← mk_embedding w, comap_mk, isReal_mk_iff, isReal_mk_iff, ComplexEmbedding.isReal_comp_iff]
lemma comap_surjective [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] :
Function.Surjective (comap · (algebraMap k K)) := fun w ↦
⟨(mk (ComplexEmbedding.lift K w.embedding)), by simp⟩
lemma mult_comap_le (f : k →+* K) (w : InfinitePlace K) : mult (w.comap f) ≤ mult w := by
rw [mult, mult]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
pick_goal 3
· exact (h₁ (h₂.comap _)).elim
all_goals decide
variable [Algebra k K] (σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K) (w : InfinitePlace K)
variable (k K)
lemma card_mono [NumberField k] [NumberField K] :
card (InfinitePlace k) ≤ card (InfinitePlace K) :=
have := Module.Finite.of_restrictScalars_finite ℚ k K
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ comap_surjective
variable {k K}
/-- The action of the galois group on infinite places. -/
@[simps! smul_coe_apply]
instance : MulAction (K ≃ₐ[k] K) (InfinitePlace K) where
smul := fun σ w ↦ w.comap σ.symm
one_smul := fun _ ↦ rfl
mul_smul := fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl
lemma smul_eq_comap : σ • w = w.comap σ.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (x) : (σ • w) x = w (σ.symm x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) : σ • mk φ = mk (φ.comp σ.symm) := rfl
lemma comap_smul {f : F →+* K} : (σ • w).comap f = w.comap (RingHom.comp σ.symm f) := rfl
variable {σ w}
lemma isReal_smul_iff : IsReal (σ • w) ↔ IsReal w := isReal_comap_iff (f := σ.symm.toRingEquiv)
lemma isComplex_smul_iff : IsComplex (σ • w) ↔ IsComplex w := by
rw [← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, ← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, isReal_smul_iff]
lemma ComplexEmbedding.exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq [IsGalois k K] (φ ψ : K →+* ℂ)
(h : φ.comp (algebraMap k K) = ψ.comp (algebraMap k K)) :
∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, φ.comp σ.symm = ψ := by
letI := (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)).toAlgebra
letI := φ.toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower k K ℂ := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
let ψ' : K →ₐ[k] ℂ := { ψ with commutes' := fun r ↦ (RingHom.congr_fun h r).symm }
use (AlgHom.restrictNormal' ψ' K).symm
ext1 x
exact AlgHom.restrictNormal_commutes ψ' K x
lemma exists_smul_eq_of_comap_eq [IsGalois k K] {w w' : InfinitePlace K}
(h : w.comap (algebraMap k K) = w'.comap (algebraMap k K)) : ∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, σ • w = w' := by
rw [← mk_embedding w, ← mk_embedding w', comap_mk, comap_mk, mk_eq_iff] at h
cases h with
| inl h =>
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq w.embedding w'.embedding h
use σ
rw [← mk_embedding w, ← mk_embedding w', smul_mk, hσ]
| inr h =>
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq
((starRingEnd ℂ).comp (embedding w)) w'.embedding h
use σ
rw [← mk_embedding w, ← mk_embedding w', smul_mk, mk_eq_iff]
exact Or.inr hσ
lemma mem_orbit_iff [IsGalois k K] {w w' : InfinitePlace K} :
w' ∈ MulAction.orbit (K ≃ₐ[k] K) w ↔ w.comap (algebraMap k K) = w'.comap (algebraMap k K) := by
refine ⟨?_, exists_smul_eq_of_comap_eq⟩
| rintro ⟨σ, rfl : σ • w = w'⟩
rw [← mk_embedding w, comap_mk, smul_mk, comap_mk]
congr 1; ext1; simp
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Embeddings.lean | 776 | 779 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.WithTopBot
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
/-!
# Locally finite orders
This file defines locally finite orders.
A locally finite order is an order for which all bounded intervals are finite. This allows to make
sense of `Icc`/`Ico`/`Ioc`/`Ioo` as lists, multisets, or finsets.
Further, if the order is bounded above (resp. below), then we can also make sense of the
"unbounded" intervals `Ici`/`Ioi` (resp. `Iic`/`Iio`).
Many theorems about these intervals can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic`.
## Examples
Naturally occurring locally finite orders are `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, `α × β` the product of two
locally finite orders, `α →₀ β` the finitely supported functions to a locally finite order `β`...
## Main declarations
In a `LocallyFiniteOrder`,
* `Finset.Icc`: Closed-closed interval as a finset.
* `Finset.Ico`: Closed-open interval as a finset.
* `Finset.Ioc`: Open-closed interval as a finset.
* `Finset.Ioo`: Open-open interval as a finset.
* `Finset.uIcc`: Unordered closed interval as a finset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderTop`,
* `Finset.Ici`: Closed-infinite interval as a finset.
* `Finset.Ioi`: Open-infinite interval as a finset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderBot`,
* `Finset.Iic`: Infinite-open interval as a finset.
* `Finset.Iio`: Infinite-closed interval as a finset.
## Instances
A `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance can be built
* for a subtype of a locally finite order. See `Subtype.locallyFiniteOrder`.
* for the product of two locally finite orders. See `Prod.locallyFiniteOrder`.
* for any fintype (but not as an instance). See `Fintype.toLocallyFiniteOrder`.
* from a definition of `Finset.Icc` alone. See `LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc`.
* by pulling back `LocallyFiniteOrder β` through an order embedding `f : α →o β`. See
`OrderEmbedding.locallyFiniteOrder`.
Instances for concrete types are proved in their respective files:
* `ℕ` is in `Order.Interval.Finset.Nat`
* `ℤ` is in `Data.Int.Interval`
* `ℕ+` is in `Data.PNat.Interval`
* `Fin n` is in `Order.Interval.Finset.Fin`
* `Finset α` is in `Data.Finset.Interval`
* `Σ i, α i` is in `Data.Sigma.Interval`
Along, you will find lemmas about the cardinality of those finite intervals.
## TODO
Provide the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `α ×ₗ β` where `LocallyFiniteOrder α` and
`Fintype β`.
Provide the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `α →₀ β` where `β` is locally finite. Provide the
`LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `Π₀ i, β i` where all the `β i` are locally finite.
From `LinearOrder α`, `NoMaxOrder α`, `LocallyFiniteOrder α`, we can also define an
order isomorphism `α ≃ ℕ` or `α ≃ ℤ`, depending on whether we have `OrderBot α` or
`NoMinOrder α` and `Nonempty α`. When `OrderBot α`, we can match `a : α` to `#(Iio a)`.
We can provide `SuccOrder α` from `LinearOrder α` and `LocallyFiniteOrder α` using
```lean
lemma exists_min_greater [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x ub : α} (hx : x < ub) :
∃ lub, x < lub ∧ ∀ y, x < y → lub ≤ y := by
-- very non golfed
have h : (Finset.Ioc x ub).Nonempty := ⟨ub, Finset.mem_Ioc.2 ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩⟩
use Finset.min' (Finset.Ioc x ub) h
constructor
· exact (Finset.mem_Ioc.mp <| Finset.min'_mem _ h).1
rintro y hxy
obtain hy | hy := le_total y ub
· refine Finset.min'_le (Ioc x ub) y ?_
simp [*] at *
· exact (Finset.min'_le _ _ (Finset.mem_Ioc.2 ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩)).trans hy
```
Note that the converse is not true. Consider `{-2^z | z : ℤ} ∪ {2^z | z : ℤ}`. Any element has a
successor (and actually a predecessor as well), so it is a `SuccOrder`, but it's not locally finite
as `Icc (-1) 1` is infinite.
-/
open Finset Function
/-- This is a mixin class describing a locally finite order,
that is, is an order where bounded intervals are finite.
When you don't care too much about definitional equality, you can use `LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc` or
`LocallyFiniteOrder.ofFiniteIcc` to build a locally finite order from just `Finset.Icc`. -/
class LocallyFiniteOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Left-closed right-closed interval -/
finsetIcc : α → α → Finset α
/-- Left-closed right-open interval -/
finsetIco : α → α → Finset α
/-- Left-open right-closed interval -/
finsetIoc : α → α → Finset α
/-- Left-open right-open interval -/
finsetIoo : α → α → Finset α
/-- `x ∈ finsetIcc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b` -/
finset_mem_Icc : ∀ a b x : α, x ∈ finsetIcc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b
/-- `x ∈ finsetIco a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b` -/
finset_mem_Ico : ∀ a b x : α, x ∈ finsetIco a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b
/-- `x ∈ finsetIoc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b` -/
finset_mem_Ioc : ∀ a b x : α, x ∈ finsetIoc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b
/-- `x ∈ finsetIoo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b` -/
finset_mem_Ioo : ∀ a b x : α, x ∈ finsetIoo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b
/-- This mixin class describes an order where all intervals bounded below are finite. This is
slightly weaker than `LocallyFiniteOrder` + `OrderTop` as it allows empty types. -/
class LocallyFiniteOrderTop (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Left-open right-infinite interval -/
finsetIoi : α → Finset α
/-- Left-closed right-infinite interval -/
finsetIci : α → Finset α
/-- `x ∈ finsetIci a ↔ a ≤ x` -/
finset_mem_Ici : ∀ a x : α, x ∈ finsetIci a ↔ a ≤ x
/-- `x ∈ finsetIoi a ↔ a < x` -/
finset_mem_Ioi : ∀ a x : α, x ∈ finsetIoi a ↔ a < x
/-- This mixin class describes an order where all intervals bounded above are finite. This is
slightly weaker than `LocallyFiniteOrder` + `OrderBot` as it allows empty types. -/
class LocallyFiniteOrderBot (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Left-infinite right-open interval -/
finsetIio : α → Finset α
/-- Left-infinite right-closed interval -/
finsetIic : α → Finset α
/-- `x ∈ finsetIic a ↔ x ≤ a` -/
finset_mem_Iic : ∀ a x : α, x ∈ finsetIic a ↔ x ≤ a
/-- `x ∈ finsetIio a ↔ x < a` -/
finset_mem_Iio : ∀ a x : α, x ∈ finsetIio a ↔ x < a
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Icc` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc`, this one requires `DecidableLE` but
only `Preorder`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc' (α : Type*) [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α]
(finsetIcc : α → α → Finset α) (mem_Icc : ∀ a b x, x ∈ finsetIcc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b) :
LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc := finsetIcc
finsetIco a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | ¬b ≤ x}
finsetIoc a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | ¬x ≤ a}
finsetIoo a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | ¬x ≤ a ∧ ¬b ≤ x}
finset_mem_Icc := mem_Icc
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_assoc, lt_iff_le_not_le]
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_right_comm, lt_iff_le_not_le]
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_and_and_comm, lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_not_le]
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Icc` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc'`, this one requires `PartialOrder` but only
`DecidableEq`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [DecidableEq α]
(finsetIcc : α → α → Finset α) (mem_Icc : ∀ a b x, x ∈ finsetIcc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b) :
LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc := finsetIcc
finsetIco a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | x ≠ b}
finsetIoc a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | a ≠ x}
finsetIoo a b := {x ∈ finsetIcc a b | a ≠ x ∧ x ≠ b}
finset_mem_Icc := mem_Icc
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_assoc, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_right_comm, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
rw [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Icc, and_and_and_comm, lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Ici` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrderTop.ofIci`, this one requires `DecidableLE` but
only `Preorder`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrderTop.ofIci' (α : Type*) [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α]
(finsetIci : α → Finset α) (mem_Ici : ∀ a x, x ∈ finsetIci a ↔ a ≤ x) :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop α where
finsetIci := finsetIci
finsetIoi a := {x ∈ finsetIci a | ¬x ≤ a}
finset_mem_Ici := mem_Ici
finset_mem_Ioi a x := by rw [mem_filter, mem_Ici, lt_iff_le_not_le]
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Ici` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrderTop.ofIci'`, this one requires `PartialOrder` but
only `DecidableEq`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrderTop.ofIci (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [DecidableEq α]
(finsetIci : α → Finset α) (mem_Ici : ∀ a x, x ∈ finsetIci a ↔ a ≤ x) :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop α where
finsetIci := finsetIci
finsetIoi a := {x ∈ finsetIci a | a ≠ x}
finset_mem_Ici := mem_Ici
finset_mem_Ioi a x := by rw [mem_filter, mem_Ici, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Iic` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrderBot.ofIic`, this one requires `DecidableLE` but
only `Preorder`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrderBot.ofIic' (α : Type*) [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α]
(finsetIic : α → Finset α) (mem_Iic : ∀ a x, x ∈ finsetIic a ↔ x ≤ a) :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot α where
finsetIic := finsetIic
finsetIio a := {x ∈ finsetIic a | ¬a ≤ x}
finset_mem_Iic := mem_Iic
finset_mem_Iio a x := by rw [mem_filter, mem_Iic, lt_iff_le_not_le]
/-- A constructor from a definition of `Finset.Iic` alone, the other ones being derived by removing
the ends. As opposed to `LocallyFiniteOrderBot.ofIic'`, this one requires `PartialOrder` but
only `DecidableEq`. -/
def LocallyFiniteOrderBot.ofIic (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [DecidableEq α]
(finsetIic : α → Finset α) (mem_Iic : ∀ a x, x ∈ finsetIic a ↔ x ≤ a) :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot α where
finsetIic := finsetIic
finsetIio a := {x ∈ finsetIic a | x ≠ a}
finset_mem_Iic := mem_Iic
finset_mem_Iio a x := by rw [mem_filter, mem_Iic, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
variable {α β : Type*}
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- An empty type is locally finite.
This is not an instance as it would not be defeq to more specific instances. -/
protected abbrev IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrder [Preorder α] [IsEmpty α] : LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc := isEmptyElim
finsetIco := isEmptyElim
finsetIoc := isEmptyElim
finsetIoo := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Icc := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Ico := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Ioc := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Ioo := isEmptyElim
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- An empty type is locally finite.
This is not an instance as it would not be defeq to more specific instances. -/
protected abbrev IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop [Preorder α] [IsEmpty α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop α where
finsetIci := isEmptyElim
finsetIoi := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Ici := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Ioi := isEmptyElim
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- An empty type is locally finite.
This is not an instance as it would not be defeq to more specific instances. -/
protected abbrev IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot [Preorder α] [IsEmpty α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot α where
finsetIic := isEmptyElim
finsetIio := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Iic := isEmptyElim
finset_mem_Iio := isEmptyElim
/-! ### Intervals as finsets -/
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b x : α}
/-- The finset $[a, b]$ of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Icc a b` as a
finset. -/
def Icc (a b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finsetIcc a b
/-- The finset $[a, b)$ of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ico a b` as a
finset. -/
def Ico (a b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finsetIco a b
/-- The finset $(a, b]$ of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Ioc a b` as a
finset. -/
def Ioc (a b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finsetIoc a b
/-- The finset $(a, b)$ of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ioo a b` as a
finset. -/
def Ioo (a b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finsetIoo a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finset_mem_Icc a b x
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finset_mem_Ico a b x
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finset_mem_Ioc a b x
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.finset_mem_Ioo a b x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Icc (a b : α) : (Icc a b : Set α) = Set.Icc a b :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Icc
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Ico (a b : α) : (Ico a b : Set α) = Set.Ico a b :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Ico
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Ioc (a b : α) : (Ioc a b : Set α) = Set.Ioc a b :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Ioc
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Ioo (a b : α) : (Ioo a b : Set α) = Set.Ioo a b :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Icc (a b : α) [Fintype (Set.Icc a b)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = #(Icc a b) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Ico (a b : α) [Fintype (Set.Ico a b)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = #(Ico a b) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Ioc (a b : α) [Fintype (Set.Ioc a b)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = #(Ioc a b) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Ioo (a b : α) [Fintype (Set.Ioo a b)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = #(Ioo a b) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a x : α}
/-- The finset $[a, ∞)$ of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x`. Basically `Set.Ici a` as a finset. -/
def Ici (a : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrderTop.finsetIci a
/-- The finset $(a, ∞)$ of elements `x` such that `a < x`. Basically `Set.Ioi a` as a finset. -/
def Ioi (a : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrderTop.finsetIoi a
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
LocallyFiniteOrderTop.finset_mem_Ici _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
LocallyFiniteOrderTop.finset_mem_Ioi _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Ici (a : α) : (Ici a : Set α) = Set.Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Ici
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Ioi (a : α) : (Ioi a : Set α) = Set.Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Ici (a : α) [Fintype (Set.Ici a)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Ici a) = #(Ici a) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Ioi (a : α) [Fintype (Set.Ioi a)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Ioi a) = #(Ioi a) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a x : α}
/-- The finset $(-∞, b]$ of elements `x` such that `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Iic b` as a finset. -/
def Iic (b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrderBot.finsetIic b
/-- The finset $(-∞, b)$ of elements `x` such that `x < b`. Basically `Set.Iio b` as a finset. -/
def Iio (b : α) : Finset α :=
LocallyFiniteOrderBot.finsetIio b
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic a ↔ x ≤ a :=
LocallyFiniteOrderBot.finset_mem_Iic _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio a ↔ x < a :=
LocallyFiniteOrderBot.finset_mem_Iio _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a : Set α) = Set.Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Iic
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_Iio (a : α) : (Iio a : Set α) = Set.Iio a :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Iic (a : α) [Fintype (Set.Iic a)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Iic a) = #(Iic a) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_Iio (a : α) [Fintype (Set.Iio a)] :
Fintype.card (Set.Iio a) = #(Iio a) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a x : α}
-- See note [lower priority instance]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.LocallyFiniteOrder.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop α where
finsetIci b := Icc b ⊤
finsetIoi b := Ioc b ⊤
finset_mem_Ici a x := by rw [mem_Icc, and_iff_left le_top]
finset_mem_Ioi a x := by rw [mem_Ioc, and_iff_left le_top]
theorem Ici_eq_Icc (a : α) : Ici a = Icc a ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_eq_Ioc (a : α) : Ioi a = Ioc a ⊤ :=
rfl
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {b x : α}
-- See note [lower priority instance]
instance (priority := 100) LocallyFiniteOrder.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot α where
finsetIic := Icc ⊥
finsetIio := Ico ⊥
finset_mem_Iic a x := by rw [mem_Icc, and_iff_right bot_le]
finset_mem_Iio a x := by rw [mem_Ico, and_iff_right bot_le]
theorem Iic_eq_Icc : Iic = Icc (⊥ : α) :=
rfl
theorem Iio_eq_Ico : Iio = Ico (⊥ : α) :=
rfl
end OrderBot
end Preorder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b x : α}
/-- `Finset.uIcc a b` is the set of elements lying between `a` and `b`, with `a` and `b` included.
Note that we define it more generally in a lattice as `Finset.Icc (a ⊓ b) (a ⊔ b)`. In a
product type, `Finset.uIcc` corresponds to the bounding box of the two elements. -/
def uIcc (a b : α) : Finset α :=
Icc (a ⊓ b) (a ⊔ b)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetInterval] notation "[[" a ", " b "]]" => Finset.uIcc a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_uIcc : x ∈ uIcc a b ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ x ∧ x ≤ a ⊔ b :=
mem_Icc
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_uIcc (a b : α) : (Finset.uIcc a b : Set α) = Set.uIcc a b :=
coe_Icc _ _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_uIcc (a b : α) [Fintype (Set.uIcc a b)] :
Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = #(uIcc a b) :=
Fintype.card_of_finset' _ fun _ ↦ by simp [Set.uIcc]
end Lattice
end Finset
namespace Mathlib.Meta
open Lean Elab Term Meta Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Elaborate set builder notation for `Finset`.
* `{x ≤ a | p x}` is elaborated as `Finset.filter (fun x ↦ p x) (Finset.Iic a)` if the expected type
is `Finset ?α`.
* `{x ≥ a | p x}` is elaborated as `Finset.filter (fun x ↦ p x) (Finset.Ici a)` if the expected type
is `Finset ?α`.
* `{x < a | p x}` is elaborated as `Finset.filter (fun x ↦ p x) (Finset.Iio a)` if the expected type
is `Finset ?α`.
* `{x > a | p x}` is elaborated as `Finset.filter (fun x ↦ p x) (Finset.Ioi a)` if the expected type
is `Finset ?α`.
See also
* `Data.Set.Defs` for the `Set` builder notation elaborator that this elaborator partly overrides.
* `Data.Finset.Basic` for the `Finset` builder notation elaborator partly overriding this one for
syntax of the form `{x ∈ s | p x}`.
* `Data.Fintype.Basic` for the `Finset` builder notation elaborator handling syntax of the form
`{x | p x}`, `{x : α | p x}`, `{x ∉ s | p x}`, `{x ≠ a | p x}`.
TODO: Write a delaborator
-/
@[term_elab setBuilder]
def elabFinsetBuilderIxx : TermElab
| `({ $x:ident ≤ $a | $p }), expectedType? => do
-- If the expected type is not known to be `Finset ?α`, give up.
unless ← knownToBeFinsetNotSet expectedType? do throwUnsupportedSyntax
elabTerm (← `(Finset.filter (fun $x:ident ↦ $p) (Finset.Iic $a))) expectedType?
| `({ $x:ident ≥ $a | $p }), expectedType? => do
-- If the expected type is not known to be `Finset ?α`, give up.
unless ← knownToBeFinsetNotSet expectedType? do throwUnsupportedSyntax
elabTerm (← `(Finset.filter (fun $x:ident ↦ $p) (Finset.Ici $a))) expectedType?
| `({ $x:ident < $a | $p }), expectedType? => do
-- If the expected type is not known to be `Finset ?α`, give up.
unless ← knownToBeFinsetNotSet expectedType? do throwUnsupportedSyntax
elabTerm (← `(Finset.filter (fun $x:ident ↦ $p) (Finset.Iio $a))) expectedType?
| `({ $x:ident > $a | $p }), expectedType? => do
-- If the expected type is not known to be `Finset ?α`, give up.
unless ← knownToBeFinsetNotSet expectedType? do throwUnsupportedSyntax
elabTerm (← `(Finset.filter (fun $x:ident ↦ $p) (Finset.Ioi $a))) expectedType?
| _, _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
end Mathlib.Meta
/-! ### Finiteness of `Set` intervals -/
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] (a b : α)
instance instFintypeIcc : Fintype (Icc a b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Icc a b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Icc
instance instFintypeIco : Fintype (Ico a b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Ico a b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Ico
instance instFintypeIoc : Fintype (Ioc a b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Ioc a b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Ioc
instance instFintypeIoo : Fintype (Ioo a b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Ioo a b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Ioo
theorem finite_Icc : (Icc a b).Finite :=
(Icc a b).toFinite
theorem finite_Ico : (Ico a b).Finite :=
(Ico a b).toFinite
theorem finite_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Finite :=
(Ioc a b).toFinite
theorem finite_Ioo : (Ioo a b).Finite :=
(Ioo a b).toFinite
end Preorder
section OrderTop
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] (a : α)
instance instFintypeIci : Fintype (Ici a) := .ofFinset (Finset.Ici a) fun _ => Finset.mem_Ici
instance instFintypeIoi : Fintype (Ioi a) := .ofFinset (Finset.Ioi a) fun _ => Finset.mem_Ioi
theorem finite_Ici : (Ici a).Finite :=
(Ici a).toFinite
theorem finite_Ioi : (Ioi a).Finite :=
(Ioi a).toFinite
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] (b : α)
instance instFintypeIic : Fintype (Iic b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Iic b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Iic
instance instFintypeIio : Fintype (Iio b) := .ofFinset (Finset.Iio b) fun _ => Finset.mem_Iio
theorem finite_Iic : (Iic b).Finite :=
(Iic b).toFinite
theorem finite_Iio : (Iio b).Finite :=
(Iio b).toFinite
end OrderBot
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] (a b : α)
instance fintypeUIcc : Fintype (uIcc a b) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.uIcc a b) fun _ => Finset.mem_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem finite_interval : (uIcc a b).Finite := (uIcc _ _).toFinite
end Lattice
end Set
/-! ### Instances -/
open Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
/-- A noncomputable constructor from the finiteness of all closed intervals. -/
noncomputable def LocallyFiniteOrder.ofFiniteIcc (h : ∀ a b : α, (Set.Icc a b).Finite) :
LocallyFiniteOrder α :=
@LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc' α _ (Classical.decRel _) (fun a b => (h a b).toFinset) fun a b x => by
rw [Set.Finite.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_Icc]
/-- A fintype is a locally finite order.
This is not an instance as it would not be defeq to better instances such as
`Fin.locallyFiniteOrder`.
-/
abbrev Fintype.toLocallyFiniteOrder [Fintype α] [DecidableLT α] [DecidableLE α] :
LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc a b := (Set.Icc a b).toFinset
finsetIco a b := (Set.Ico a b).toFinset
finsetIoc a b := (Set.Ioc a b).toFinset
finsetIoo a b := (Set.Ioo a b).toFinset
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_Icc]
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_Ico]
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_Ioc]
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_Ioo]
instance : Subsingleton (LocallyFiniteOrder α) :=
Subsingleton.intro fun h₀ h₁ => by
obtain ⟨h₀_finset_Icc, h₀_finset_Ico, h₀_finset_Ioc, h₀_finset_Ioo,
h₀_finset_mem_Icc, h₀_finset_mem_Ico, h₀_finset_mem_Ioc, h₀_finset_mem_Ioo⟩ := h₀
obtain ⟨h₁_finset_Icc, h₁_finset_Ico, h₁_finset_Ioc, h₁_finset_Ioo,
h₁_finset_mem_Icc, h₁_finset_mem_Ico, h₁_finset_mem_Ioc, h₁_finset_mem_Ioo⟩ := h₁
have hIcc : h₀_finset_Icc = h₁_finset_Icc := by
ext a b x
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Icc, h₁_finset_mem_Icc]
have hIco : h₀_finset_Ico = h₁_finset_Ico := by
ext a b x
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Ico, h₁_finset_mem_Ico]
have hIoc : h₀_finset_Ioc = h₁_finset_Ioc := by
ext a b x
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Ioc, h₁_finset_mem_Ioc]
have hIoo : h₀_finset_Ioo = h₁_finset_Ioo := by
ext a b x
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Ioo, h₁_finset_mem_Ioo]
simp_rw [hIcc, hIco, hIoc, hIoo]
instance : Subsingleton (LocallyFiniteOrderTop α) :=
Subsingleton.intro fun h₀ h₁ => by
obtain ⟨h₀_finset_Ioi, h₀_finset_Ici, h₀_finset_mem_Ici, h₀_finset_mem_Ioi⟩ := h₀
obtain ⟨h₁_finset_Ioi, h₁_finset_Ici, h₁_finset_mem_Ici, h₁_finset_mem_Ioi⟩ := h₁
have hIci : h₀_finset_Ici = h₁_finset_Ici := by
ext a b
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Ici, h₁_finset_mem_Ici]
have hIoi : h₀_finset_Ioi = h₁_finset_Ioi := by
ext a b
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Ioi, h₁_finset_mem_Ioi]
simp_rw [hIci, hIoi]
instance : Subsingleton (LocallyFiniteOrderBot α) :=
Subsingleton.intro fun h₀ h₁ => by
obtain ⟨h₀_finset_Iio, h₀_finset_Iic, h₀_finset_mem_Iic, h₀_finset_mem_Iio⟩ := h₀
obtain ⟨h₁_finset_Iio, h₁_finset_Iic, h₁_finset_mem_Iic, h₁_finset_mem_Iio⟩ := h₁
have hIic : h₀_finset_Iic = h₁_finset_Iic := by
ext a b
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Iic, h₁_finset_mem_Iic]
have hIio : h₀_finset_Iio = h₁_finset_Iio := by
ext a b
rw [h₀_finset_mem_Iio, h₁_finset_mem_Iio]
simp_rw [hIic, hIio]
-- Should this be called `LocallyFiniteOrder.lift`?
/-- Given an order embedding `α ↪o β`, pulls back the `LocallyFiniteOrder` on `β` to `α`. -/
protected noncomputable def OrderEmbedding.locallyFiniteOrder [LocallyFiniteOrder β] (f : α ↪o β) :
LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc a b := (Icc (f a) (f b)).preimage f f.toEmbedding.injective.injOn
finsetIco a b := (Ico (f a) (f b)).preimage f f.toEmbedding.injective.injOn
finsetIoc a b := (Ioc (f a) (f b)).preimage f f.toEmbedding.injective.injOn
finsetIoo a b := (Ioo (f a) (f b)).preimage f f.toEmbedding.injective.injOn
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by rw [mem_preimage, mem_Icc, f.le_iff_le, f.le_iff_le]
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by rw [mem_preimage, mem_Ico, f.le_iff_le, f.lt_iff_lt]
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by rw [mem_preimage, mem_Ioc, f.lt_iff_lt, f.le_iff_le]
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by rw [mem_preimage, mem_Ioo, f.lt_iff_lt, f.lt_iff_lt]
/-! ### `OrderDual` -/
open OrderDual
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] (a b : α)
/-- Note we define `Icc (toDual a) (toDual b)` as `Icc α _ _ b a` (which has type `Finset α` not
`Finset αᵒᵈ`!) instead of `(Icc b a).map toDual.toEmbedding` as this means the
following is defeq:
```
lemma this : (Icc (toDual (toDual a)) (toDual (toDual b)) :) = (Icc a b :) := rfl
```
-/
instance OrderDual.instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder αᵒᵈ where
finsetIcc a b := @Icc α _ _ (ofDual b) (ofDual a)
finsetIco a b := @Ioc α _ _ (ofDual b) (ofDual a)
finsetIoc a b := @Ico α _ _ (ofDual b) (ofDual a)
finsetIoo a b := @Ioo α _ _ (ofDual b) (ofDual a)
finset_mem_Icc _ _ _ := (mem_Icc (α := α)).trans and_comm
finset_mem_Ico _ _ _ := (mem_Ioc (α := α)).trans and_comm
finset_mem_Ioc _ _ _ := (mem_Ico (α := α)).trans and_comm
finset_mem_Ioo _ _ _ := (mem_Ioo (α := α)).trans and_comm
lemma Finset.Icc_orderDual_def (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Icc a b = (Icc (ofDual b) (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ico_orderDual_def (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ico a b = (Ioc (ofDual b) (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioc_orderDual_def (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ioc a b = (Ico (ofDual b) (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioo_orderDual_def (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ioo a b = (Ioo (ofDual b) (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = (Icc b a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = (Ioc b a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = (Ico b a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = (Ioo b a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Icc_ofDual (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Icc (ofDual a) (ofDual b) = (Icc b a).map ofDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ico_ofDual (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ico (ofDual a) (ofDual b) = (Ioc b a).map ofDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioc_ofDual (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ioc (ofDual a) (ofDual b) = (Ico b a).map ofDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioo_ofDual (a b : αᵒᵈ) :
Ioo (ofDual a) (ofDual b) = (Ioo b a).map ofDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
/-- Note we define `Iic (toDual a)` as `Ici a` (which has type `Finset α` not `Finset αᵒᵈ`!)
instead of `(Ici a).map toDual.toEmbedding` as this means the following is defeq:
```
lemma this : (Iic (toDual (toDual a)) :) = (Iic a :) := rfl
```
-/
instance OrderDual.instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot αᵒᵈ where
finsetIic a := @Ici α _ _ (ofDual a)
finsetIio a := @Ioi α _ _ (ofDual a)
finset_mem_Iic _ _ := mem_Ici (α := α)
finset_mem_Iio _ _ := mem_Ioi (α := α)
lemma Iic_orderDual_def (a : αᵒᵈ) : Iic a = (Ici (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Iio_orderDual_def (a : αᵒᵈ) : Iio a = (Ioi (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Iic_toDual (a : α) : Iic (toDual a) = (Ici a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Iio_toDual (a : α) : Iio (toDual a) = (Ioi a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ici_ofDual (a : αᵒᵈ) : Ici (ofDual a) = (Iic a).map ofDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioi_ofDual (a : αᵒᵈ) : Ioi (ofDual a) = (Iio a).map ofDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
/-- Note we define `Ici (toDual a)` as `Iic a` (which has type `Finset α` not `Finset αᵒᵈ`!)
instead of `(Iic a).map toDual.toEmbedding` as this means the following is defeq:
```
lemma this : (Ici (toDual (toDual a)) :) = (Ici a :) := rfl
```
-/
instance OrderDual.instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : LocallyFiniteOrderTop αᵒᵈ where
finsetIci a := @Iic α _ _ (ofDual a)
finsetIoi a := @Iio α _ _ (ofDual a)
finset_mem_Ici _ _ := mem_Iic (α := α)
finset_mem_Ioi _ _ := mem_Iio (α := α)
lemma Ici_orderDual_def (a : αᵒᵈ) : Ici a = (Iic (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Ioi_orderDual_def (a : αᵒᵈ) : Ioi a = (Iio (ofDual a)).map toDual.toEmbedding := map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ici_toDual (a : α) : Ici (toDual a) = (Iic a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Ioi_toDual (a : α) : Ioi (toDual a) = (Iio a).map toDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Iic_ofDual (a : αᵒᵈ) : Iic (ofDual a) = (Ici a).map ofDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
lemma Finset.Iio_ofDual (a : αᵒᵈ) : Iio (ofDual a) = (Ioi a).map ofDual.toEmbedding :=
map_refl.symm
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
/-! ### `Prod` -/
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β] [DecidableLE (α × β)]
instance Prod.instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (α × β) :=
LocallyFiniteOrder.ofIcc' (α × β) (fun x y ↦ Icc x.1 y.1 ×ˢ Icc x.2 y.2) fun a b x => by
rw [mem_product, mem_Icc, mem_Icc, and_and_and_comm, le_def, le_def]
lemma Finset.Icc_prod_def (x y : α × β) : Icc x y = Icc x.1 y.1 ×ˢ Icc x.2 y.2 := rfl
lemma Finset.Icc_product_Icc (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
Icc a₁ a₂ ×ˢ Icc b₁ b₂ = Icc (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := rfl
lemma Finset.card_Icc_prod (x y : α × β) : #(Icc x y) = #(Icc x.1 y.1) * #(Icc x.2 y.2) :=
card_product ..
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop β] [DecidableLE (α × β)]
instance Prod.instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : LocallyFiniteOrderTop (α × β) :=
LocallyFiniteOrderTop.ofIci' (α × β) (fun x => Ici x.1 ×ˢ Ici x.2) fun a x => by
rw [mem_product, mem_Ici, mem_Ici, le_def]
lemma Finset.Ici_prod_def (x : α × β) : Ici x = Ici x.1 ×ˢ Ici x.2 := rfl
lemma Finset.Ici_product_Ici (a : α) (b : β) : Ici a ×ˢ Ici b = Ici (a, b) := rfl
lemma Finset.card_Ici_prod (x : α × β) : #(Ici x) = #(Ici x.1) * #(Ici x.2) :=
card_product _ _
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot β] [DecidableLE (α × β)]
instance Prod.instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot (α × β) :=
LocallyFiniteOrderBot.ofIic' (α × β) (fun x ↦ Iic x.1 ×ˢ Iic x.2) fun a x ↦ by
rw [mem_product, mem_Iic, mem_Iic, le_def]
lemma Finset.Iic_prod_def (x : α × β) : Iic x = Iic x.1 ×ˢ Iic x.2 := rfl
lemma Finset.Iic_product_Iic (a : α) (b : β) : Iic a ×ˢ Iic b = Iic (a, b) := rfl
lemma Finset.card_Iic_prod (x : α × β) : #(Iic x) = #(Iic x.1) * #(Iic x.2) := card_product ..
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end Preorder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β] [DecidableLE (α × β)]
lemma Finset.uIcc_prod_def (x y : α × β) : uIcc x y = uIcc x.1 y.1 ×ˢ uIcc x.2 y.2 := rfl
lemma Finset.uIcc_product_uIcc (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
uIcc a₁ a₂ ×ˢ uIcc b₁ b₂ = uIcc (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := rfl
lemma Finset.card_uIcc_prod (x y : α × β) : #(uIcc x y) = #(uIcc x.1 y.1) * #(uIcc x.2 y.2) :=
card_product ..
end Lattice
/-!
#### `WithTop`, `WithBot`
Adding a `⊤` to a locally finite `OrderTop` keeps it locally finite.
Adding a `⊥` to a locally finite `OrderBot` keeps it locally finite.
-/
namespace WithTop
/-- Given a finset on `α`, lift it to being a finset on `WithTop α`
using `WithTop.some` and then insert `⊤`. -/
def insertTop : Finset α ↪o Finset (WithTop α) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff
(fun s => cons ⊤ (s.map Embedding.coeWithTop) <| by simp)
(fun s t => by rw [le_iff_subset, cons_subset_cons, map_subset_map, le_iff_subset])
@[simp]
theorem some_mem_insertTop {s : Finset α} {a : α} : ↑a ∈ insertTop s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp [insertTop]
@[simp]
theorem top_mem_insertTop {s : Finset α} : ⊤ ∈ insertTop s := by
simp [insertTop]
variable (α) [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
instance locallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (WithTop α) where
finsetIcc a b :=
match a, b with
| ⊤, ⊤ => {⊤}
| ⊤, (b : α) => ∅
| (a : α), ⊤ => insertTop (Ici a)
| (a : α), (b : α) => (Icc a b).map Embedding.coeWithTop
finsetIco a b :=
match a, b with
| ⊤, _ => ∅
| (a : α), ⊤ => (Ici a).map Embedding.coeWithTop
| (a : α), (b : α) => (Ico a b).map Embedding.coeWithTop
finsetIoc a b :=
match a, b with
| ⊤, _ => ∅
| (a : α), ⊤ => insertTop (Ioi a)
| (a : α), (b : α) => (Ioc a b).map Embedding.coeWithTop
finsetIoo a b :=
match a, b with
| ⊤, _ => ∅
| (a : α), ⊤ => (Ioi a).map Embedding.coeWithTop
| (a : α), (b : α) => (Ioo a b).map Embedding.coeWithTop
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases x <;> simp
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases x <;> simp
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases x <;> simp
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases x <;> simp
variable (a b : α)
theorem Icc_coe_top : Icc (a : WithTop α) ⊤ = insertNone (Ici a) :=
rfl
theorem Icc_coe_coe : Icc (a : WithTop α) b = (Icc a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ico_coe_top : Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ = (Ici a).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ico_coe_coe : Ico (a : WithTop α) b = (Ico a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_coe_top : Ioc (a : WithTop α) ⊤ = insertNone (Ioi a) :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_coe_coe : Ioc (a : WithTop α) b = (Ioc a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_coe_top : Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ = (Ioi a).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_coe_coe : Ioo (a : WithTop α) b = (Ioo a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
end WithTop
namespace WithBot
/-- Given a finset on `α`, lift it to being a finset on `WithBot α`
using `WithBot.some` and then insert `⊥`. -/
def insertBot : Finset α ↪o Finset (WithBot α) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff
(fun s => cons ⊥ (s.map Embedding.coeWithBot) <| by simp)
(fun s t => by rw [le_iff_subset, cons_subset_cons, map_subset_map, le_iff_subset])
@[simp]
theorem some_mem_insertBot {s : Finset α} {a : α} : ↑a ∈ insertBot s ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp [insertBot]
@[simp]
theorem bot_mem_insertBot {s : Finset α} : ⊥ ∈ insertBot s := by
simp [insertBot]
variable (α) [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (WithBot α) :=
OrderDual.instLocallyFiniteOrder (α := WithTop αᵒᵈ)
variable (a b : α)
theorem Icc_bot_coe : Icc (⊥ : WithBot α) b = insertNone (Iic b) :=
rfl
theorem Icc_coe_coe : Icc (a : WithBot α) b = (Icc a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ico_bot_coe : Ico (⊥ : WithBot α) b = insertNone (Iio b) :=
rfl
theorem Ico_coe_coe : Ico (a : WithBot α) b = (Ico a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_bot_coe : Ioc (⊥ : WithBot α) b = (Iic b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_coe_coe : Ioc (a : WithBot α) b = (Ioc a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_bot_coe : Ioo (⊥ : WithBot α) b = (Iio b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_coe_coe : Ioo (a : WithBot α) b = (Ioo a b).map Embedding.some :=
rfl
end WithBot
namespace OrderIso
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
/-! #### Transfer locally finite orders across order isomorphisms -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Transfer `LocallyFiniteOrder` across an `OrderIso`. -/
abbrev locallyFiniteOrder [LocallyFiniteOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) : LocallyFiniteOrder α where
finsetIcc a b := (Icc (f a) (f b)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finsetIco a b := (Ico (f a) (f b)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finsetIoc a b := (Ioc (f a) (f b)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finsetIoo a b := (Ioo (f a) (f b)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finset_mem_Icc := by simp
finset_mem_Ico := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo := by simp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Transfer `LocallyFiniteOrderTop` across an `OrderIso`. -/
abbrev locallyFiniteOrderTop [LocallyFiniteOrderTop β] (f : α ≃o β) : LocallyFiniteOrderTop α where
finsetIci a := (Ici (f a)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finsetIoi a := (Ioi (f a)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finset_mem_Ici := by simp
finset_mem_Ioi := by simp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Transfer `LocallyFiniteOrderBot` across an `OrderIso`. -/
abbrev locallyFiniteOrderBot [LocallyFiniteOrderBot β] (f : α ≃o β) : LocallyFiniteOrderBot α where
finsetIic a := (Iic (f a)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finsetIio a := (Iio (f a)).map f.symm.toEquiv.toEmbedding
finset_mem_Iic := by simp
finset_mem_Iio := by simp
end OrderIso
/-! #### Subtype of a locally finite order -/
variable [Preorder α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
instance Subtype.instLocallyFiniteOrder [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
LocallyFiniteOrder (Subtype p) where
finsetIcc a b := (Icc (a : α) b).subtype p
finsetIco a b := (Ico (a : α) b).subtype p
finsetIoc a b := (Ioc (a : α) b).subtype p
finsetIoo a b := (Ioo (a : α) b).subtype p
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Icc, Subtype.coe_le_coe]
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Ico, Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Ioc, Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Ioo, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
instance Subtype.instLocallyFiniteOrderTop [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Subtype p) where
finsetIci a := (Ici (a : α)).subtype p
finsetIoi a := (Ioi (a : α)).subtype p
finset_mem_Ici a x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Ici, Subtype.coe_le_coe]
finset_mem_Ioi a x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Ioi, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
instance Subtype.instLocallyFiniteOrderBot [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Subtype p) where
finsetIic a := (Iic (a : α)).subtype p
finsetIio a := (Iio (a : α)).subtype p
finset_mem_Iic a x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Iic, Subtype.coe_le_coe]
finset_mem_Iio a x := by simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype, mem_Iio, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
namespace Finset
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] (a b : Subtype p)
theorem subtype_Icc_eq : Icc a b = (Icc (a : α) b).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem subtype_Ico_eq : Ico a b = (Ico (a : α) b).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem subtype_Ioc_eq : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : α) b).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem subtype_Ioo_eq : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : α) b).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Icc (hp : ∀ ⦃a b x⦄, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → p a → p b → p x):
(Icc a b).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Icc a b : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Icc_eq]
refine Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_Icc] at hx
exact hp hx.1 hx.2 a.prop b.prop
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ico (hp : ∀ ⦃a b x⦄, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → p a → p b → p x):
(Ico a b).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Ico a b : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Ico_eq]
refine Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_Ico] at hx
exact hp hx.1 hx.2.le a.prop b.prop
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ioc (hp : ∀ ⦃a b x⦄, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → p a → p b → p x):
(Ioc a b).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Ioc a b : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Ioc_eq]
refine Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_Ioc] at hx
exact hp hx.1.le hx.2 a.prop b.prop
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ioo (hp : ∀ ⦃a b x⦄, a ≤ x → x ≤ b → p a → p b → p x):
(Ioo a b).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Ioo a b : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Ioo_eq]
refine Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_Ioo] at hx
exact hp hx.1.le hx.2.le a.prop b.prop
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] (a : Subtype p)
theorem subtype_Ici_eq : Ici a = (Ici (a : α)).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem subtype_Ioi_eq : Ioi a = (Ioi (a : α)).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ici (hp : ∀ ⦃a x⦄, a ≤ x → p a → p x) :
(Ici a).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Ici a : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Ici_eq]
exact Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => hp (mem_Ici.1 hx) a.prop
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ioi (hp : ∀ ⦃a x⦄, a ≤ x → p a → p x) :
(Ioi a).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Ioi a : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Ioi_eq]
exact Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => hp (mem_Ioi.1 hx).le a.prop
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] (a : Subtype p)
theorem subtype_Iic_eq : Iic a = (Iic (a : α)).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem subtype_Iio_eq : Iio a = (Iio (a : α)).subtype p :=
rfl
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Iic (hp : ∀ ⦃a x⦄, x ≤ a → p a → p x) :
(Iic a).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Iic a : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Iic_eq]
exact Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => hp (mem_Iic.1 hx) a.prop
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Iio (hp : ∀ ⦃a x⦄, x ≤ a → p a → p x) :
(Iio a).map (Embedding.subtype p) = (Iio a : Finset α) := by
rw [subtype_Iio_eq]
exact Finset.subtype_map_of_mem fun x hx => hp (mem_Iio.1 hx).le a.prop
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end Finset
section Finite
variable {α : Type*} {s : Set α}
theorem BddBelow.finite_of_bddAbove [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
{s : Set α} (h₀ : BddBelow s) (h₁ : BddAbove s) :
s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₀
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := h₁
(Set.finite_Icc a b).subset fun _x hx ↦ ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
theorem Set.finite_iff_bddAbove [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [OrderBot α] :
s.Finite ↔ BddAbove s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.toFinset.sup id, fun _ hx ↦ Finset.le_sup (f := id) ((Finite.mem_toFinset h).mpr hx)⟩,
fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ↦ (Set.finite_Icc ⊥ m).subset (fun _ hx ↦ ⟨bot_le, hm hx⟩)⟩
theorem Set.finite_iff_bddBelow [SemilatticeInf α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [OrderTop α] :
s.Finite ↔ BddBelow s :=
finite_iff_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Set.finite_iff_bddBelow_bddAbove [Nonempty α] [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
s.Finite ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s := by
obtain (rfl | hs) := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp only [Set.finite_empty, bddBelow_empty, bddAbove_empty, and_self]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨h.toFinset.inf' ((Finite.toFinset_nonempty h).mpr hs) id,
fun x hx ↦ Finset.inf'_le id ((Finite.mem_toFinset h).mpr hx)⟩,
⟨h.toFinset.sup' ((Finite.toFinset_nonempty h).mpr hs) id, fun x hx ↦ Finset.le_sup' id
((Finite.mem_toFinset h).mpr hx)⟩⟩,
fun ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ ↦ BddBelow.finite_of_bddAbove h₀ h₁⟩
end Finite
/-! We make the instances below low priority
so when alternative constructions are available they are preferred. -/
variable {y : α}
instance (priority := low) [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop { x : α // x ≤ y } where
finsetIoi a := Finset.Ioc a ⟨y, by rfl⟩
finsetIci a := Finset.Icc a ⟨y, by rfl⟩
finset_mem_Ici a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_Icc, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
finset_mem_Ioi a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_Ioc, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
instance (priority := low) [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderTop { x : α // x < y } where
finsetIoi a := (Finset.Ioo ↑a y).subtype _
finsetIci a := (Finset.Ico ↑a y).subtype _
finset_mem_Ici a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_subtype, Finset.mem_Ico, Subtype.coe_le_coe, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
finset_mem_Ioi a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_subtype, Finset.mem_Ioo, Subtype.coe_lt_coe, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
instance (priority := low) [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot { x : α // y ≤ x } where
finsetIio a := Finset.Ico ⟨y, by rfl⟩ a
finsetIic a := Finset.Icc ⟨y, by rfl⟩ a
finset_mem_Iic a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_Icc, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
finset_mem_Iio a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
instance (priority := low) [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] :
LocallyFiniteOrderBot { x : α // y < x } where
finsetIio a := (Finset.Ioo y ↑a).subtype _
finsetIic a := (Finset.Ioc y ↑a).subtype _
finset_mem_Iic a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_subtype, Finset.mem_Ioc, Subtype.coe_le_coe, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
finset_mem_Iio a b := by
simp only [Finset.mem_subtype, Finset.mem_Ioo, Subtype.coe_lt_coe, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun _ => b.property
instance [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] : Finite { x : α // x ≤ y } := by
simpa only [coe_Iic] using (Finset.Iic y).finite_toSet
instance [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] : Finite { x : α // x < y } := by
simpa only [coe_Iio] using (Finset.Iio y).finite_toSet
instance [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] : Finite { x : α // y ≤ x } := by
simpa only [coe_Ici] using (Finset.Ici y).finite_toSet
instance [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] : Finite { x : α // y < x } := by
simpa only [coe_Ioi] using (Finset.Ioi y).finite_toSet
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp] lemma toFinset_Icc (a b : α) [Fintype (Icc a b)] : (Icc a b).toFinset = Finset.Icc a b := by
ext; simp
@[simp] lemma toFinset_Ico (a b : α) [Fintype (Ico a b)] : (Ico a b).toFinset = Finset.Ico a b := by
ext; simp
@[simp] lemma toFinset_Ioc (a b : α) [Fintype (Ioc a b)] : (Ioc a b).toFinset = Finset.Ioc a b := by
ext; simp
@[simp] lemma toFinset_Ioo (a b : α) [Fintype (Ioo a b)] : (Ioo a b).toFinset = Finset.Ioo a b := by
ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_Ici (a : α) [Fintype (Ici a)] : (Ici a).toFinset = Finset.Ici a := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_Ioi (a : α) [Fintype (Ioi a)] : (Ioi a).toFinset = Finset.Ioi a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_Iic (a : α) [Fintype (Iic a)] : (Iic a).toFinset = Finset.Iic a := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_Iio (a : α) [Fintype (Iio a)] : (Iio a).toFinset = Finset.Iio a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end Set
/-- A `LocallyFiniteOrder` can be transferred across an order isomorphism. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev LocallyFiniteOrder.ofOrderIsoClass {F M N : Type*} [Preorder M] [Preorder N]
[EquivLike F M N] [OrderIsoClass F M N] (f : F) [LocallyFiniteOrder N] :
LocallyFiniteOrder M where
finsetIcc x y := (finsetIcc (f x) (f y)).map ⟨EquivLike.inv f, (EquivLike.right_inv f).injective⟩
finsetIco x y := (finsetIco (f x) (f y)).map ⟨EquivLike.inv f, (EquivLike.right_inv f).injective⟩
finsetIoc x y := (finsetIoc (f x) (f y)).map ⟨EquivLike.inv f, (EquivLike.right_inv f).injective⟩
finsetIoo x y := (finsetIoo (f x) (f y)).map ⟨EquivLike.inv f, (EquivLike.right_inv f).injective⟩
finset_mem_Icc := by simp [finset_mem_Icc, EquivLike.inv_apply_eq_iff_eq_apply]
finset_mem_Ico := by
simp [finset_mem_Ico, EquivLike.inv_apply_eq_iff_eq_apply, map_lt_map_iff]
finset_mem_Ioc := by
simp [finset_mem_Ioc, EquivLike.inv_apply_eq_iff_eq_apply, map_lt_map_iff]
finset_mem_Ioo := by
simp [finset_mem_Ioo, EquivLike.inv_apply_eq_iff_eq_apply, map_lt_map_iff]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Defs.lean | 1,361 | 1,362 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
/-!
# Line derivatives
We define the line derivative of a function `f : E → F`, at a point `x : E` along a vector `v : E`,
as the element `f' : F` such that `f (x + t • v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` as `t` tends to `0` in
the scalar field `𝕜`, if it exists. It is denoted by `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`.
This notion is generally less well behaved than the full Fréchet derivative (for instance, the
composition of functions which are line-differentiable is not line-differentiable in general).
The Fréchet derivative should therefore be favored over this one in general, although the line
derivative may sometimes prove handy.
The line derivative in direction `v` is also called the Gateaux derivative in direction `v`,
although the term "Gateaux derivative" is sometimes reserved for the situation where there is
such a derivative in all directions, for the map `v ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` (which doesn't have to be
linear in general).
## Main definition and results
We mimic the definitions and statements for the Fréchet derivative and the one-dimensional
derivative. We define in particular the following objects:
* `LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v`
* `HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`
* `HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`
and develop about them a basic API inspired by the one for the Fréchet derivative.
We depart from the Fréchet derivative in two places, as the dependence of the following predicates
on the direction would make them barely usable:
* We do not define an analogue of the predicate `UniqueDiffOn`;
* We do not define `LineDifferentiableOn` nor `LineDifferentiable`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section Module
/-!
Results that do not rely on a topological structure on `E`
-/
variable (𝕜)
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v` in the set `s`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` in the set `s` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def LineDifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`. -/
def LineDifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v` within the set `s`, if it exists.
Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def lineDerivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
derivWithin (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
-/
def lineDeriv (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
deriv (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₁ : E → F} {f' f₀' f₁' : F} {s t : Set E} {x v : E}
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.mono hf (preimage_mono hst)
lemma HasLineDerivAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) (s : Set E) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v :=
HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt hf
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.lineDifferentiableWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt hf
theorem HasLineDerivAt.lineDifferentiableAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v :=
HasDerivAt.differentiableAt hf
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f (lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v) s x v :=
DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.hasLineDerivAt (h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f (lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v) x v :=
DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt h
@[simp] lemma hasLineDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' univ x v ↔ HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v := by
simp only [HasLineDerivWithinAt, HasLineDerivAt, preimage_univ, hasDerivWithinAt_univ]
theorem lineDerivWithin_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = 0 :=
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
theorem lineDeriv_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableAt (h : ¬LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = 0 :=
deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
theorem hasLineDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v ↔
(fun t : 𝕜 => f (x + t • v) - f x - t • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun t => t := by
simp only [HasLineDerivAt, hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, zero_add, zero_smul, add_zero]
theorem HasLineDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f₀' x v) (h₁ : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f₁' x v) :
f₀' = f₁' :=
HasDerivAt.unique h₀ h₁
protected theorem HasLineDerivAt.lineDeriv (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = f' := by
rw [h.unique h.lineDifferentiableAt.hasLineDerivAt]
theorem lineDifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x v ↔ LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v := by
simp only [LineDifferentiableWithinAt, LineDifferentiableAt, preimage_univ,
differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.lineDifferentiableWithinAt (h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
(differentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem lineDerivWithin_univ : lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f univ x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v := by
simp [lineDerivWithin, lineDeriv]
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v) (st : s ⊆ t) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.mono st).lineDifferentiableWithinAt
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' t x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h (fun _ hy ↦ ht hy) (by simpa using hx) (preimage_mono h₁)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr' (h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v)
(hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v :=
h.congr hs (hs hx)
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(ht : EqOn f₁ f t) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ t x v :=
(HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasLineDerivWithinAt ht hx h₁).differentiableWithinAt
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x v :=
LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v :=
derivWithin_congr (fun _ hy ↦ hs hy) (by simpa using hx)
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr' (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v :=
lineDerivWithin_congr hs (hs hx)
theorem hasLineDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v ↔
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 f') := by
simp only [HasLineDerivAt, hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero, zero_add,
zero_smul, add_zero]
alias ⟨HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero, _⟩ := hasLineDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero
theorem HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsGT_le_nhdsNE 0)
theorem HasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_left [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
Tendsto (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) (𝓝[<] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsLT_le_nhdsNE 0)
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt'
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : ∀ᶠ t : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x + t • v ∈ s) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v :=
h.hasDerivAt hs
end Module
section NormedSpace
/-!
Results that need a normed space structure on `E`
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{f f₀ f₁ : E → F} {f' : F} {s t : Set E} {x v : E} {L : E →L[𝕜] F}
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v := by
apply HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin h
apply ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' _ hst (by simp)
apply Continuous.continuousWithinAt; fun_prop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt
(h : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v :=
h.hasLineDerivAt' <| (Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) 0 _ (by simp)).eventually hs
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.lineDifferentiableAt (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivAt hs).lineDifferentiableAt
lemma HasFDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f L s x) (v : E) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f (L v) s x v := by
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
rw [show x = F (0 : 𝕜) by simp [F]] at hf
have A : HasDerivWithinAt F (0 + (1 : 𝕜) • v) (F ⁻¹' s) 0 :=
((hasDerivAt_const (0 : 𝕜) x).add ((hasDerivAt_id' (0 : 𝕜)).smul_const v)).hasDerivWithinAt
simp only [one_smul, zero_add] at A
exact hf.comp_hasDerivWithinAt (x := (0 : 𝕜)) A (mapsTo_preimage F s)
lemma HasFDerivAt.hasLineDerivAt (hf : HasFDerivAt f L x) (v : E) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f (L v) x v := by
rw [← hasLineDerivWithinAt_univ]
exact hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt v
lemma DifferentiableAt.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = fderiv 𝕜 f x v :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.hasLineDerivAt v).lineDeriv
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).lineDifferentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := LineDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem lineDerivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v := by
apply derivWithin_of_mem_nhds
apply (Continuous.continuousAt _).preimage_mem_nhds (by simpa using h)
fun_prop
theorem lineDerivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v :=
lineDerivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
theorem hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v ↔ HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v := by
apply hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
have B : ContinuousAt F 0 := by apply Continuous.continuousAt; fun_prop
have : s =ᶠ[𝓝 (F 0)] t := by convert h; simp [F]
exact B.preimage_mem_nhds this
theorem lineDifferentiableWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v ↔ LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x v :=
⟨fun h' ↦ ((hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set h).1
h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt,
fun h' ↦ ((hasLineDerivWithinAt_congr_set h.symm).1
h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem lineDerivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f t x v := by
apply derivWithin_congr_set
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
have B : ContinuousAt F 0 := by apply Continuous.continuousAt; fun_prop
have : s =ᶠ[𝓝 (F 0)] t := by convert h; simp [F]
exact B.preimage_mem_nhds this
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasLineDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f₀ f' x v ↔ HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f₁ f' x v := by
apply hasDerivAt_iff
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
have B : ContinuousAt F 0 := by apply Continuous.continuousAt; fun_prop
have : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 (F 0)] f₁ := by convert h; simp [F]
exact B.preimage_mem_nhds this
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDifferentiableAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₀ x v ↔ LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x v :=
⟨fun h' ↦ (h.hasLineDerivAt_iff.1 h'.hasLineDerivAt).lineDifferentiableAt,
fun h' ↦ (h.hasLineDerivAt_iff.2 h'.hasLineDerivAt).lineDifferentiableAt⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasLineDerivWithinAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ f' s x v ↔ HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v := by
apply hasDerivWithinAt_iff
· have A : Continuous (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v) := by fun_prop
exact A.continuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' h (by simp)
· simpa using hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasLineDerivWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ f' s x v ↔ HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v :=
h.hasLineDerivWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDifferentiableWithinAt_iff
(h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x v ↔ LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x v :=
⟨fun h' ↦ ((h.hasLineDerivWithinAt_iff hx).1 h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt,
fun h' ↦ ((h.hasLineDerivWithinAt_iff hx).2 h'.hasLineDerivWithinAt).lineDifferentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem
(h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x v ↔ LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x v :=
h.lineDifferentiableWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v)
(h'f : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ f' s x v := by
apply HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hf _ (by simp [hx])
have A : Continuous (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v) := by fun_prop
exact A.continuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' h'f (by simp)
theorem HasLineDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f₁ f' x v := by
apply HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
rw [show x = F 0 by simp [F]] at h₁
exact (Continuous.continuousAt (by fun_prop)).preimage_mem_nhds h₁
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x v :=
(h.hasLineDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx).differentiableWithinAt
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x v := by
apply DifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h
let F := fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v
rw [show x = F 0 by simp [F]] at hL
exact (Continuous.continuousAt (by fun_prop)).preimage_mem_nhds hL
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDerivWithin_eq (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v := by
apply derivWithin_eq ?_ (by simpa using hx)
have A : Continuous (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x + t • v) := by fun_prop
exact A.continuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' hs (by simp)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDerivWithin_eq_nhds (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x v = lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v :=
(h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds).lineDerivWithin_eq h.self_of_nhds
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.lineDeriv_eq (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f₁ x v = lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v := by
rw [← lineDerivWithin_univ, ← lineDerivWithin_univ, h.lineDerivWithin_eq_nhds]
/-- Converse to the mean value inequality: if `f` is line differentiable at `x₀` and `C`-lipschitz
on a neighborhood of `x₀` then its line derivative at `x₀` in the direction `v` has norm
bounded by `C * ‖v‖`. This version only assumes that `‖f x - f x₀‖ ≤ C * ‖x - x₀‖` in a
neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasLineDerivAt.le_of_lip' {f : E → F} {f' : F} {x₀ : E} (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x₀ v)
{C : ℝ} (hC₀ : 0 ≤ C) (hlip : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ‖f x - f x₀‖ ≤ C * ‖x - x₀‖) :
‖f'‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖ := by
apply HasDerivAt.le_of_lip' hf (by positivity)
have A : Continuous (fun (t : 𝕜) ↦ x₀ + t • v) := by fun_prop
| have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (x₀ + (0 : 𝕜) • v), ‖f x - f x₀‖ ≤ C * ‖x - x₀‖ := by simpa using hlip
filter_upwards [(A.continuousAt (x := 0)).preimage_mem_nhds this] with t ht
simp only [preimage_setOf_eq, add_sub_cancel_left, norm_smul, mem_setOf_eq, mul_comm (‖t‖)] at ht
simpa [mul_assoc] using ht
/-- Converse to the mean value inequality: if `f` is line differentiable at `x₀` and `C`-lipschitz
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LineDeriv/Basic.lean | 400 | 405 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.