Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
|
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 532 | 534 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
/-!
# Natural number multiplicity
This file contains lemmas about the multiplicity function (the maximum prime power dividing a
number) when applied to naturals, in particular calculating it for factorials and binomial
coefficients.
## Multiplicity calculations
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. The multiplicity of `p` in `n!` is
`n / p + ... + n / p ^ b` for any `b` such that `n / p ^ (b + 1) = 0`. See `padicValNat_factorial`
for this result stated in the language of `p`-adic valuations and
`sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial` for a related result.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial_mul`: The multiplicity of `p` in `(p * n)!` is `n` more than
that of `n!`.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_choose`: Kummer's Theorem. The multiplicity of `p` in `n.choose k` is the
number of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added in base `p`. See `padicValNat_choose` for the
same result but stated in the language of `p`-adic valuations and
`sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits` for a related result.
## Other declarations
* `Nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd`: The multiplicity of `m` in `n` is the number of positive
natural numbers `i` such that `m ^ i` divides `n`.
* `Nat.multiplicity_two_factorial_lt`: The multiplicity of `2` in `n!` is strictly less than `n`.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_something`: Specialization of `multiplicity.something` to a prime in the
naturals. Avoids having to provide `p ≠ 1` and other trivialities, along with translating between
`Prime` and `Nat.Prime`.
## Tags
Legendre, p-adic
-/
open Finset Nat
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- The multiplicity of `m` in `n` is the number of positive natural numbers `i` such that `m ^ i`
divides `n`. This set is expressed by filtering `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than
`log m n`. -/
theorem emultiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd {m n b : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) (hb : log m n < b) :
emultiplicity m n = #{i ∈ Ico 1 b | m ^ i ∣ n} :=
have fin := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨hm, hn⟩
| calc
emultiplicity m n = #(Ico 1 <| multiplicity m n + 1) := by
simp [fin.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
_ = #{i ∈ Ico 1 b | m ^ i ∣ n} :=
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg card <|
Finset.ext fun i => by
simp only [mem_Ico, Nat.lt_succ_iff,
fin.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, mem_filter,
and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, iff_and_self]
intro hi h
rw [← fin.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity] at h
rcases m with - | m
· rw [zero_pow, zero_dvd_iff] at h
exacts [(hn.ne' h).elim, one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hi]
refine LE.le.trans_lt ?_ hb
exact le_log_of_pow_le (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.2 ⟨m.succ_ne_zero, hm⟩)
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Multiplicity.lean | 61 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
/-!
# The rational numbers are a commutative ring
This file contains the commutative ring instance on the rational numbers.
See note [foundational algebra order theory].
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid Field PNat Nat.gcd_greatest IsDomain.toCancelMonoidWithZero
namespace Rat
/-! ### Instances -/
instance commRing : CommRing ℚ where
__ := addCommGroup
__ := commMonoid
zero_mul := Rat.zero_mul
mul_zero := Rat.mul_zero
left_distrib := Rat.mul_add
right_distrib := Rat.add_mul
intCast := fun n => n
natCast n := Int.cast n
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by
simp only [intCast_eq_divInt, divInt_add_divInt _ _ Int.one_ne_zero Int.one_ne_zero,
← divInt_one_one, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_one, mul_one]
instance commGroupWithZero : CommGroupWithZero ℚ :=
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, Rat.zero_ne_one⟩
inv_zero := by
change Rat.inv 0 = 0
rw [Rat.inv_def]
rfl
mul_inv_cancel := Rat.mul_inv_cancel
mul_zero := mul_zero
zero_mul := zero_mul }
instance isDomain : IsDomain ℚ := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
/-- The characteristic of `ℚ` is 0. -/
@[stacks 09FS "Second part."]
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ where cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
/-!
### Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
These also prevent non-computable instances being used to construct these instances non-computably.
-/
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring ℚ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℚ := by infer_instance
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
lemma mkRat_eq_div (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : mkRat n d = n / d := by
simp only [mkRat_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_div, Int.cast_natCast]
lemma divInt_div_divInt_cancel_left {x : ℤ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (n d : ℤ) :
n /. x / (d /. x) = n /. d := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_divInt', divInt_mul_divInt_cancel hx]
lemma divInt_div_divInt_cancel_right {x : ℤ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (n d : ℤ) :
x /. n / (x /. d) = d /. n := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_divInt', mul_comm, divInt_mul_divInt_cancel hx]
lemma num_div_den (r : ℚ) : (r.num : ℚ) / (r.den : ℚ) = r := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ← divInt_eq_div, num_divInt_den]
@[simp] lemma divInt_pow (num : ℕ) (den : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : (num /. den) ^ n = num ^ n /. den ^ n := by
simp [divInt_eq_div, div_pow, Int.natCast_pow]
@[simp] lemma mkRat_pow (num den : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : mkRat num den ^ n = mkRat (num ^ n) (den ^ n) := by
rw [mkRat_eq_divInt, mkRat_eq_divInt, divInt_pow, Int.natCast_pow]
lemma natCast_eq_divInt (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n /. 1 := by rw [← Int.cast_natCast, intCast_eq_divInt]
| @[simp] lemma mul_den_eq_num (q : ℚ) : q * q.den = q.num := by
suffices (q.num /. ↑q.den) * (↑q.den /. 1) = q.num /. 1 by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Rat.lean | 88 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Data.Vector3
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic
/-!
# Diophantine functions and Matiyasevic's theorem
Hilbert's tenth problem asked whether there exists an algorithm which for a given integer polynomial
determines whether this polynomial has integer solutions. It was answered in the negative in 1970,
the final step being completed by Matiyasevic who showed that the power function is Diophantine.
Here a function is called Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine as a set. A subset `S ⊆ ℕ ^ α` in
turn is called Diophantine if there exists an integer polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff
there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
## Main definitions
* `IsPoly`: a predicate stating that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
* `Poly`: the type of multivariate integer polynomial functions.
* `Dioph`: a predicate stating that a set is Diophantine, i.e. a set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is
Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there
exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
* `DiophFn`: a predicate on a function stating that it is Diophantine in the sense that its graph
is Diophantine as a set.
## Main statements
* `pell_dioph` states that solutions to Pell's equation form a Diophantine set.
* `pow_dioph` states that the power function is Diophantine, a version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevic's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
## TODO
* Finish the solution of Hilbert's tenth problem.
* Connect `Poly` to `MvPolynomial`
-/
open Fin2 Function Nat Sum
local infixr:67 " ::ₒ " => Option.elim'
local infixr:65 " ⊗ " => Sum.elim
universe u
/-!
### Multivariate integer polynomials
Note that this duplicates `MvPolynomial`.
-/
section Polynomials
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A predicate asserting that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
(We are being a bit lazy here by allowing many representations for multiplication,
rather than only allowing monomials and addition, but the definition is equivalent
and this is easier to use.) -/
inductive IsPoly : ((α → ℕ) → ℤ) → Prop
| proj : ∀ i, IsPoly fun x : α → ℕ => x i
| const : ∀ n : ℤ, IsPoly fun _ : α → ℕ => n
| sub : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x - g x
| mul : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x * g x
theorem IsPoly.neg {f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} : IsPoly f → IsPoly (-f) := by
rw [← zero_sub]; exact (IsPoly.const 0).sub
theorem IsPoly.add {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} (hf : IsPoly f) (hg : IsPoly g) : IsPoly (f + g) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add]; exact hf.sub hg.neg
/-- The type of multivariate integer polynomials -/
def Poly (α : Type u) := { f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ // IsPoly f }
namespace Poly
section
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Poly α) (α → ℕ) ℤ :=
⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
/-- The underlying function of a `Poly` is a polynomial -/
protected theorem isPoly (f : Poly α) : IsPoly f := f.2
/-- Extensionality for `Poly α` -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Poly α} : (∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g := DFunLike.ext _ _
/-- The `i`th projection function, `x_i`. -/
def proj (i : α) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.proj i⟩
@[simp]
theorem proj_apply (i : α) (x) : proj i x = x i := rfl
/-- The constant function with value `n : ℤ`. -/
def const (n : ℤ) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.const n⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (n) (x : α → ℕ) : const n x = n := rfl
instance : Zero (Poly α) := ⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (Poly α) := ⟨const 1⟩
instance : Neg (Poly α) := ⟨fun f => ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
instance : Add (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
instance : Sub (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f - g, f.2.sub g.2⟩⟩
instance : Mul (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Poly α) = const 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : Poly α) = const 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : Poly α) : ⇑(-f) = -f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f * g) = f * g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x) : (0 : Poly α) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (x) : (1 : Poly α) x = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : Poly α) (x) : (-f) x = -f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f * g) x = f x * g x := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Inhabited (Poly α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : AddCommGroup (Poly α) where
add := ((· + ·) : Poly α → Poly α → Poly α)
neg := (Neg.neg : Poly α → Poly α)
sub := Sub.sub
zero := 0
nsmul := @nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, add_zero]
zero_add _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, zero_add]
add_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, add_comm]
add_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, ← add_assoc]
neg_add_cancel _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, neg_apply, neg_add_cancel, zero_apply]
instance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α) :=
{ (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α)) with
one := 1
natCast := fun n => Poly.const n
intCast := Poly.const }
instance : CommRing (Poly α) where
__ := (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α))
__ := (inferInstance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α))
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec _ ⟨(1 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, one_mul]
mul_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply mul_add
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp only [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply add_mul
theorem induction {C : Poly α → Prop} (H1 : ∀ i, C (proj i)) (H2 : ∀ n, C (const n))
(H3 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f - g)) (H4 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f * g)) (f : Poly α) : C f := by
obtain ⟨f, pf⟩ := f
induction pf with
| proj => apply H1
| const => apply H2
| sub _ _ ihf ihg => apply H3 _ _ ihf ihg
| mul _ _ ihf ihg => apply H4 _ _ ihf ihg
/-- The sum of squares of a list of polynomials. This is relevant for
Diophantine equations, because it means that a list of equations
can be encoded as a single equation: `x = 0 ∧ y = 0 ∧ z = 0` is
equivalent to `x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0`. -/
def sumsq : List (Poly α) → Poly α
| [] => 0
| p::ps => p * p + sumsq ps
theorem sumsq_nonneg (x : α → ℕ) : ∀ l, 0 ≤ sumsq l x
| [] => le_refl 0
| p::ps => by
rw [sumsq]
exact add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (sumsq_nonneg _ ps)
theorem sumsq_eq_zero (x) : ∀ l, sumsq l x = 0 ↔ l.Forall fun a : Poly α => a x = 0
| [] => eq_self_iff_true _
| p::ps => by
rw [List.forall_cons, ← sumsq_eq_zero _ ps]; rw [sumsq]
exact
⟨fun h : p x * p x + sumsq ps x = 0 =>
have : p x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero <|
le_antisymm
(by
rw [← h]
have t := add_le_add_left (sumsq_nonneg x ps) (p x * p x)
rwa [add_zero] at t)
(mul_self_nonneg _)
⟨this, by simpa [this] using h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => by rw [add_apply, mul_apply, h1, h2]; rfl⟩
end
/-- Map the index set of variables, replacing `x_i` with `x_(f i)`. -/
def map {α β} (f : α → β) (g : Poly α) : Poly β :=
⟨fun v => g <| v ∘ f, Poly.induction (C := fun g => IsPoly (fun v => g (v ∘ f)))
(fun i => by simpa using IsPoly.proj _) (fun n => by simpa using IsPoly.const _)
(fun f g pf pg => by simpa using IsPoly.sub pf pg)
(fun f g pf pg => by simpa using IsPoly.mul pf pg) _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_apply {α β} (f : α → β) (g : Poly α) (v) : map f g v = g (v ∘ f) := rfl
end Poly
end Polynomials
/-! ### Diophantine sets -/
/-- A set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on
`α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`. -/
def Dioph {α : Type u} (S : Set (α → ℕ)) : Prop :=
∃ (β : Type u) (p : Poly (α ⊕ β)), ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0
namespace Dioph
section
variable {α β γ : Type u} {S S' : Set (α → ℕ)}
theorem ext (d : Dioph S) (H : ∀ v, v ∈ S ↔ v ∈ S') : Dioph S' := by rwa [← Set.ext H]
theorem of_no_dummies (S : Set (α → ℕ)) (p : Poly α) (h : ∀ v, S v ↔ p v = 0) : Dioph S :=
⟨PEmpty, ⟨p.map inl, fun v => (h v).trans ⟨fun h => ⟨PEmpty.elim, h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht⟩⟩⟩
theorem inject_dummies_lem (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ x, g (f x) = some x)
(p : Poly (α ⊕ β)) (v : α → ℕ) :
(∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0) ↔ ∃ t, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) (v ⊗ t) = 0 := by
dsimp; refine ⟨fun t => ?_, fun t => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := t
· have : (v ⊗ (0 ::ₒ t) ∘ g) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) = v ⊗ t :=
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> dsimp [(· ∘ ·)]; try rw [inv]; rfl
exact ⟨(0 ::ₒ t) ∘ g, by rwa [this]⟩
· have : v ⊗ t ∘ f = (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) := funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl
exact ⟨t ∘ f, by rwa [this]⟩
theorem inject_dummies (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ x, g (f x) = some x)
(p : Poly (α ⊕ β)) (h : ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0) :
∃ q : Poly (α ⊕ γ), ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, q (v ⊗ t) = 0 :=
⟨p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f), fun v => (h v).trans <| inject_dummies_lem f g inv _ _⟩
variable (β) in
theorem reindex_dioph (f : α → β) : Dioph S → Dioph {v | v ∘ f ∈ S}
| ⟨γ, p, pe⟩ => ⟨γ, p.map (inl ∘ f ⊗ inr), fun v =>
(pe _).trans <|
exists_congr fun t =>
suffices v ∘ f ⊗ t = (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ∘ f ⊗ inr) by simp [this]
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl⟩
theorem DiophList.forall (l : List (Set <| α → ℕ)) (d : l.Forall Dioph) :
Dioph {v | l.Forall fun S : Set (α → ℕ) => v ∈ S} := by
suffices ∃ (β : _) (pl : List (Poly (α ⊕ β))), ∀ v, List.Forall (fun S : Set _ => S v) l ↔
∃ t, List.Forall (fun p : Poly (α ⊕ β) => p (v ⊗ t) = 0) pl
from
let ⟨β, pl, h⟩ := this
⟨β, Poly.sumsq pl, fun v => (h v).trans <| exists_congr fun t => (Poly.sumsq_eq_zero _ _).symm⟩
induction l with | nil => exact ⟨ULift Empty, [], fun _ => by simp⟩ | cons S l IH =>
simp? at d says simp only [List.forall_cons] at d
exact
let ⟨⟨β, p, pe⟩, dl⟩ := d
let ⟨γ, pl, ple⟩ := IH dl
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl)::pl.map fun q => q.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr),
fun v => by
simp; exact
Iff.trans (and_congr (pe v) (ple v))
⟨fun ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m ⊗ n, by
rw [show (v ⊗ m ⊗ n) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) = v ⊗ m from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl]; exact hm, by
refine List.Forall.imp (fun q hq => ?_) hn; dsimp [Function.comp_def]
rw [show
(fun x : α ⊕ γ => (v ⊗ m ⊗ n) ((inl ⊗ fun x : γ => inr (inr x)) x)) = v ⊗ n
from funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl]; exact hq⟩,
fun ⟨t, hl, hr⟩ =>
⟨⟨t ∘ inl, by
rwa [show (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) = v ⊗ t ∘ inl from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl] at hl⟩,
⟨t ∘ inr, by
refine List.Forall.imp (fun q hq => ?_) hr; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at hq
rwa [show
(fun x : α ⊕ γ => (v ⊗ t) ((inl ⊗ fun x : γ => inr (inr x)) x)) =
v ⊗ t ∘ inr
from funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl] at hq ⟩⟩⟩⟩
/-- Diophantine sets are closed under intersection. -/
theorem inter (d : Dioph S) (d' : Dioph S') : Dioph (S ∩ S') := DiophList.forall [S, S'] ⟨d, d'⟩
/-- Diophantine sets are closed under union. -/
theorem union : ∀ (_ : Dioph S) (_ : Dioph S'), Dioph (S ∪ S')
| | ⟨β, p, pe⟩, ⟨γ, q, qe⟩ =>
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) * q.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr), fun v => by
refine
Iff.trans (or_congr ((pe v).trans ?_) ((qe v).trans ?_))
(exists_or.symm.trans
(exists_congr fun t =>
(@mul_eq_zero _ _ _ (p ((v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl)))
(q ((v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr)))).symm))
· -- Porting note: putting everything on the same line fails
refine inject_dummies_lem _ (some ⊗ fun _ => none) ?_ _ _
exact fun _ => by simp only [elim_inl]
· -- Porting note: putting everything on the same line fails
refine inject_dummies_lem _ ((fun _ => none) ⊗ some) ?_ _ _
exact fun _ => by simp only [elim_inr]⟩
/-- A partial function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def DiophPFun (f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ) : Prop :=
Dioph {v : Option α → ℕ | f.graph (v ∘ some, v none)}
/-- A function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def DiophFn (f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ) : Prop :=
Dioph {v : Option α → ℕ | f (v ∘ some) = v none}
theorem reindex_diophFn {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (g : α → β) (d : DiophFn f) :
DiophFn fun v => f (v ∘ g) := by convert reindex_dioph (Option β) (Option.map g) d
theorem ex_dioph {S : Set (α ⊕ β → ℕ)} : Dioph S → Dioph {v | ∃ x, v ⊗ x ∈ S}
| ⟨γ, p, pe⟩ =>
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map ((inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) ⊗ inr ∘ inr), fun v =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := (pe _).1 hx
⟨x ⊗ t, by
simp; rw [show (v ⊗ x ⊗ t) ∘ ((inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) ⊗ inr ∘ inr) = (v ⊗ x) ⊗ t from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> try { cases a <;> rfl }; rfl]
exact ht⟩,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Dioph.lean | 338 | 372 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.PartrecCode
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Computability theory and the halting problem
A universal partial recursive function, Rice's theorem, and the halting problem.
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable
namespace Nat.Partrec
open Computable Part
theorem merge' {f g} (hf : Nat.Partrec f) (hg : Nat.Partrec g) :
∃ h, Nat.Partrec h ∧
∀ a, (∀ x ∈ h a, x ∈ f a ∨ x ∈ g a) ∧ ((h a).Dom ↔ (f a).Dom ∨ (g a).Dom) := by
obtain ⟨cf, rfl⟩ := Code.exists_code.1 hf
obtain ⟨cg, rfl⟩ := Code.exists_code.1 hg
have : Nat.Partrec fun n => Nat.rfindOpt fun k => cf.evaln k n <|> cg.evaln k n :=
Partrec.nat_iff.1
(Partrec.rfindOpt <|
Primrec.option_orElse.to_comp.comp
(Code.evaln_prim.to_comp.comp <| (snd.pair (const cf)).pair fst)
(Code.evaln_prim.to_comp.comp <| (snd.pair (const cg)).pair fst))
refine ⟨_, this, fun n => ?_⟩
have : ∀ x ∈ rfindOpt fun k ↦ HOrElse.hOrElse (Code.evaln k cf n) fun _x ↦ Code.evaln k cg n,
x ∈ Code.eval cf n ∨ x ∈ Code.eval cg n := by
intro x h
obtain ⟨k, e⟩ := Nat.rfindOpt_spec h
revert e
simp only [Option.mem_def]
rcases e' : cf.evaln k n with - | y <;> simp <;> intro e
· exact Or.inr (Code.evaln_sound e)
· subst y
exact Or.inl (Code.evaln_sound e')
refine ⟨this, ⟨fun h => (this _ ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp Exists.fst Exists.fst, ?_⟩⟩
intro h
rw [Nat.rfindOpt_dom]
simp only [dom_iff_mem, Code.evaln_complete, Option.mem_def] at h
obtain ⟨x, k, e⟩ | ⟨x, k, e⟩ := h
· refine ⟨k, x, ?_⟩
simp only [e, Option.some_orElse, Option.mem_def]
· refine ⟨k, ?_⟩
rcases cf.evaln k n with - | y
· exact ⟨x, by simp only [e, Option.mem_def, Option.none_orElse]⟩
· exact ⟨y, by simp only [Option.some_orElse, Option.mem_def]⟩
end Nat.Partrec
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable Part
open Nat.Partrec (Code)
open Nat.Partrec.Code
theorem merge' {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) :
∃ k : α →. σ,
Partrec k ∧ ∀ a, (∀ x ∈ k a, x ∈ f a ∨ x ∈ g a) ∧ ((k a).Dom ↔ (f a).Dom ∨ (g a).Dom) := by
let ⟨k, hk, H⟩ := Nat.Partrec.merge' (bind_decode₂_iff.1 hf) (bind_decode₂_iff.1 hg)
let k' (a : α) := (k (encode a)).bind fun n => (decode (α := σ) n : Part σ)
refine
⟨k', ((nat_iff.2 hk).comp Computable.encode).bind (Computable.decode.ofOption.comp snd).to₂,
fun a => ?_⟩
have : ∀ x ∈ k' a, x ∈ f a ∨ x ∈ g a := by
intro x h'
simp only [k', exists_prop, mem_coe, mem_bind_iff, Option.mem_def] at h'
obtain ⟨n, hn, hx⟩ := h'
have := (H _).1 _ hn
simp only [decode₂_encode, coe_some, bind_some, mem_map_iff] at this
obtain ⟨a', ha, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', ha, rfl⟩ := this <;> simp only [encodek, Option.some_inj] at hx <;>
rw [hx] at ha
· exact Or.inl ha
· exact Or.inr ha
refine ⟨this, ⟨fun h => (this _ ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp Exists.fst Exists.fst, ?_⟩⟩
intro h
rw [bind_dom]
have hk : (k (encode a)).Dom :=
(H _).2.2 (by simpa only [encodek₂, bind_some, coe_some] using h)
exists hk
simp only [exists_prop, mem_map_iff, mem_coe, mem_bind_iff, Option.mem_def] at H
obtain ⟨a', _, y, _, e⟩ | ⟨a', _, y, _, e⟩ := (H _).1 _ ⟨hk, rfl⟩ <;>
simp only [e.symm, encodek, coe_some, some_dom]
theorem merge {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g)
(H : ∀ (a), ∀ x ∈ f a, ∀ y ∈ g a, x = y) :
∃ k : α →. σ, Partrec k ∧ ∀ a x, x ∈ k a ↔ x ∈ f a ∨ x ∈ g a :=
let ⟨k, hk, K⟩ := merge' hf hg
⟨k, hk, fun a x =>
⟨(K _).1 _, fun h => by
have : (k a).Dom := (K _).2.2 (h.imp Exists.fst Exists.fst)
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
rcases h with h | h <;> rcases (K _).1 _ ⟨this, rfl⟩ with h' | h'
· exact mem_unique h' h
· exact (H _ _ h _ h').symm
· exact H _ _ h' _ h
· exact mem_unique h' h⟩⟩
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α →. σ} {g : α →. σ} (hc : Computable c) (hf : Partrec f)
(hg : Partrec g) : Partrec fun a => cond (c a) (f a) (g a) :=
let ⟨cf, ef⟩ := exists_code.1 hf
let ⟨cg, eg⟩ := exists_code.1 hg
((eval_part.comp (Computable.cond hc (const cf) (const cg)) Computable.encode).bind
((@Computable.decode σ _).comp snd).ofOption.to₂).of_eq
fun a => by cases c a <;> simp [ef, eg, encodek]
nonrec theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β →. σ} {h : α → γ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Partrec₂ g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) : @Partrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (sumCasesOn hf (const true).to₂ (const false).to₂)
(sumCasesOn_left hf (option_some_iff.2 hg).to₂ (const Option.none).to₂)
(sumCasesOn_right hf (const Option.none).to₂ (option_some_iff.2 hh).to₂)).of_eq
fun a => by cases f a <;> simp only [Bool.cond_true, Bool.cond_false]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := Partrec.sumCasesOn
end Partrec
/-- A computable predicate is one whose indicator function is computable. -/
def ComputablePred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) :=
∃ _ : DecidablePred p, Computable fun a => decide (p a)
/-- A recursively enumerable predicate is one which is the domain of a computable partial function.
-/
def REPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) :=
Partrec fun a => Part.assert (p a) fun _ => Part.some ()
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")] alias RePred := REPred
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")] alias RePred.of_eq := RePred
theorem REPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} (hp : REPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) :
REPred q :=
(funext fun a => propext (H a) : p = q) ▸ hp
theorem Partrec.dom_re {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α →. β} (h : Partrec f) :
REPred fun a => (f a).Dom :=
(h.map (Computable.const ()).to₂).of_eq fun n => Part.ext fun _ => by simp [Part.dom_iff_mem]
theorem ComputablePred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} (hp : ComputablePred p)
(H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : ComputablePred q :=
(funext fun a => propext (H a) : p = q) ▸ hp
namespace ComputablePred
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Nat.Partrec (Code)
open Nat.Partrec.Code Computable
theorem computable_iff {p : α → Prop} :
ComputablePred p ↔ ∃ f : α → Bool, Computable f ∧ p = fun a => (f a : Prop) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ => ⟨_, h, funext fun _ => propext (Bool.decide_iff _).symm⟩, by
rintro ⟨f, h, rfl⟩; exact ⟨by infer_instance, by simpa using h⟩⟩
protected theorem not {p : α → Prop} (hp : ComputablePred p) : ComputablePred fun a => ¬p a := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ := computable_iff.1 hp
exact
⟨by infer_instance,
(cond hf (const false) (const true)).of_eq fun n => by
simp only [Bool.not_eq_true]
cases f n <;> rfl⟩
/-- The computable functions are closed under if-then-else definitions
with computable predicates. -/
theorem ite {f₁ f₂ : ℕ → ℕ} (hf₁ : Computable f₁) (hf₂ : Computable f₂)
{c : ℕ → Prop} [DecidablePred c] (hc : ComputablePred c) :
Computable fun k ↦ if c k then f₁ k else f₂ k := by
simp_rw [← Bool.cond_decide]
obtain ⟨inst, hc⟩ := hc
convert hc.cond hf₁ hf₂
theorem to_re {p : α → Prop} (hp : ComputablePred p) : REPred p := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ := computable_iff.1 hp
unfold REPred
dsimp only []
refine
(Partrec.cond hf (Decidable.Partrec.const' (Part.some ())) Partrec.none).of_eq fun n =>
Part.ext fun a => ?_
cases a; cases f n <;> simp
/-- **Rice's Theorem** -/
theorem rice (C : Set (ℕ →. ℕ)) (h : ComputablePred fun c => eval c ∈ C) {f g} (hf : Nat.Partrec f)
(hg : Nat.Partrec g) (fC : f ∈ C) : g ∈ C := by
obtain ⟨_, h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨c, e⟩ :=
fixed_point₂
(Partrec.cond (h.comp fst) ((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hg).comp snd).to₂
((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hf).comp snd).to₂).to₂
simp only [Bool.cond_decide] at e
by_cases H : eval c ∈ C
· simp only [H, if_true] at e
change (fun b => g b) ∈ C
rwa [← e]
· simp only [H, if_false] at e
rw [e] at H
contradiction
theorem rice₂ (C : Set Code) (H : ∀ cf cg, eval cf = eval cg → (cf ∈ C ↔ cg ∈ C)) :
(ComputablePred fun c => c ∈ C) ↔ C = ∅ ∨ C = Set.univ := by
classical exact
have hC : ∀ f, f ∈ C ↔ eval f ∈ eval '' C := fun f =>
⟨Set.mem_image_of_mem _, fun ⟨g, hg, e⟩ => (H _ _ e).1 hg⟩
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun C0 =>
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun cg =>
let ⟨cf, fC⟩ := Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 C0
(hC _).2 <|
rice (eval '' C) (h.of_eq hC)
(Partrec.nat_iff.1 <| eval_part.comp (const cf) Computable.id)
(Partrec.nat_iff.1 <| eval_part.comp (const cg) Computable.id) ((hC _).1 fC),
fun h => by {
obtain rfl | rfl := h <;> simpa [ComputablePred, Set.mem_empty_iff_false] using
Computable.const _}⟩
/-- The Halting problem is recursively enumerable -/
theorem halting_problem_re (n) : REPred fun c => (eval c n).Dom :=
(eval_part.comp Computable.id (Computable.const _)).dom_re
/-- The **Halting problem** is not computable -/
theorem halting_problem (n) : ¬ComputablePred fun c => (eval c n).Dom
| h => rice { f | (f n).Dom } h Nat.Partrec.zero Nat.Partrec.none trivial
-- Post's theorem on the equivalence of r.e., co-r.e. sets and
-- computable sets. The assumption that p is decidable is required
-- unless we assume Markov's principle or LEM.
-- @[nolint decidable_classical]
theorem computable_iff_re_compl_re {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
ComputablePred p ↔ REPred p ∧ REPred fun a => ¬p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.to_re, h.not.to_re⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
⟨‹_›, by
obtain ⟨k, pk, hk⟩ :=
Partrec.merge (h₁.map (Computable.const true).to₂) (h₂.map (Computable.const false).to₂)
(by
intro a x hx y hy
simp only [Part.mem_map_iff, Part.mem_assert_iff, Part.mem_some_iff, exists_prop,
and_true, exists_const] at hx hy
cases hy.1 hx.1)
refine Partrec.of_eq pk fun n => Part.eq_some_iff.2 ?_
rw [hk]
simp only [Part.mem_map_iff, Part.mem_assert_iff, Part.mem_some_iff, exists_prop, and_true,
true_eq_decide_iff, and_self, exists_const, false_eq_decide_iff]
apply Decidable.em⟩⟩
theorem computable_iff_re_compl_re' {p : α → Prop} :
ComputablePred p ↔ REPred p ∧ REPred fun a => ¬p a := by
classical exact computable_iff_re_compl_re
theorem halting_problem_not_re (n) : ¬REPred fun c => ¬(eval c n).Dom
| h => halting_problem _ <| computable_iff_re_compl_re'.2 ⟨halting_problem_re _, h⟩
end ComputablePred
namespace Nat
open Vector Part
/-- A simplified basis for `Partrec`. -/
inductive Partrec' : ∀ {n}, (List.Vector ℕ n →. ℕ) → Prop
| prim {n f} : @Primrec' n f → @Partrec' n f
| comp {m n f} (g : Fin n → List.Vector ℕ m →. ℕ) :
Partrec' f → (∀ i, Partrec' (g i)) →
Partrec' fun v => (List.Vector.mOfFn fun i => g i v) >>= f
| rfind {n} {f : List.Vector ℕ (n + 1) → ℕ} :
@Partrec' (n + 1) f → Partrec' fun v => rfind fun n => some (f (n ::ᵥ v) = 0)
end Nat
namespace Nat.Partrec'
open List.Vector Partrec Computable
open Nat.Partrec'
theorem to_part {n f} (pf : @Partrec' n f) : _root_.Partrec f := by
induction pf with
| prim hf => exact hf.to_prim.to_comp
| comp _ _ _ hf hg => exact (Partrec.vector_mOfFn hg).bind (hf.comp snd)
| rfind _ hf =>
have := hf.comp (vector_cons.comp snd fst)
have :=
((Primrec.eq.comp _root_.Primrec.id (_root_.Primrec.const 0)).to_comp.comp
this).to₂.partrec₂
exact _root_.Partrec.rfind this
theorem of_eq {n} {f g : List.Vector ℕ n →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec' f) (H : ∀ i, f i = g i) :
Partrec' g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_prim {n} {f : List.Vector ℕ n → ℕ} (hf : Primrec f) : @Partrec' n f :=
prim (Nat.Primrec'.of_prim hf)
theorem head {n : ℕ} : @Partrec' n.succ (@head ℕ n) :=
prim Nat.Primrec'.head
theorem tail {n f} (hf : @Partrec' n f) : @Partrec' n.succ fun v => f v.tail :=
(hf.comp _ fun i => @prim _ _ <| Nat.Primrec'.get i.succ).of_eq fun v => by
simp; rw [← ofFn_get v.tail]; congr; funext i; simp
protected theorem bind {n f g} (hf : @Partrec' n f) (hg : @Partrec' (n + 1) g) :
@Partrec' n fun v => (f v).bind fun a => g (a ::ᵥ v) :=
(@comp n (n + 1) g (fun i => Fin.cases f (fun i v => some (v.get i)) i) hg fun i => by
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i <;> simp [*]
exact prim (Nat.Primrec'.get _)).of_eq
fun v => by simp [mOfFn, Part.bind_assoc, pure]
protected theorem map {n f} {g : List.Vector ℕ (n + 1) → ℕ} (hf : @Partrec' n f)
(hg : @Partrec' (n + 1) g) : @Partrec' n fun v => (f v).map fun a => g (a ::ᵥ v) := by
simpa [(Part.bind_some_eq_map _ _).symm] using hf.bind hg
/-- Analogous to `Nat.Partrec'` for `ℕ`-valued functions, a predicate for partial recursive
vector-valued functions. -/
def Vec {n m} (f : List.Vector ℕ n → List.Vector ℕ m) :=
∀ i, Partrec' fun v => (f v).get i
nonrec theorem Vec.prim {n m f} (hf : @Nat.Primrec'.Vec n m f) : Vec f := fun i => prim <| hf i
protected theorem nil {n} : @Vec n 0 fun _ => nil := fun i => i.elim0
protected theorem cons {n m} {f : List.Vector ℕ n → ℕ} {g} (hf : @Partrec' n f)
(hg : @Vec n m g) : Vec fun v => f v ::ᵥ g v := fun i =>
Fin.cases (by simpa using hf) (fun i => by simp only [hg i, get_cons_succ]) i
|
theorem idv {n} : @Vec n n id :=
Vec.prim Nat.Primrec'.idv
| Mathlib/Computability/Halting.lean | 340 | 342 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `CancelCommMonoidWithZero`s, including `IsDomain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `NormalizationMonoid`
* `GCDMonoid`
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid`
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD`
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM`
For the `NormalizedGCDMonoid` instances on `ℕ` and `ℤ`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat`.
## Implementation Notes
* `NormalizationMonoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `normUnit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `GCDMonoid` contains the definitions of `gcd` and `lcm` with the usual properties. They are
both determined up to a unit.
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid` extends `NormalizationMonoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always
normalized. This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains,
and monoids without zero.
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `gcd` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `lcm` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `normUnit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- `normUnit` assigns to each element of the monoid a unit of the monoid. -/
normUnit : α → αˣ
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps `0` to the identity. -/
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` respects multiplication of non-zero elements. -/
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps units to their inverses. -/
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_one : normUnit (1 : α) = 1 :=
normUnit_coe_units 1
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `normUnit` -/
def normalize : α →*₀ α where
toFun x := x * normUnit x
map_zero' := by
simp only [normUnit_zero]
exact mul_one (0 : α)
map_one' := by rw [normUnit_one, one_mul]; rfl
map_mul' x y :=
(by_cases fun hx : x = 0 => by rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun hx =>
(by_cases fun hy : y = 0 => by rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) fun hy => by
simp only [normUnit_mul hx hy, Units.val_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y]
theorem associated_normalize (x : α) : Associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem normalize_associated (x : α) : Associated (normalize x) x :=
(associated_normalize _).symm
theorem associated_normalize_iff {x y : α} : Associated x (normalize y) ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (normalize_associated y), fun h => h.trans (associated_normalize y)⟩
theorem normalize_associated_iff {x y : α} : Associated (normalize x) y ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => (associated_normalize _).trans h, fun h => (normalize_associated _).trans h⟩
theorem Associates.mk_normalize (x : α) : Associates.mk (normalize x) = Associates.mk x :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (normalize_associated _)
theorem normalize_apply (x : α) : normalize x = x * normUnit x :=
rfl
theorem normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 :=
normalize.map_zero
theorem normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 :=
normalize.map_one
theorem normalize_coe_units (u : αˣ) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx => (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 <| hx ▸ associated_normalize _, by
rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
theorem normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun hx => isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_mul_normUnit (a : α) : normUnit (a * normUnit a) = 1 := by
nontriviality α using Subsingleton.elim a 0
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [normUnit_zero, zero_mul, normUnit_zero]
· rw [normUnit_mul h (Units.ne_zero _), normUnit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
@[simp]
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
normalize a = normalize b := by
nontriviality α
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩
refine by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 => ?_
suffices a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ by
simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, normUnit_mul ha u.ne_zero, normUnit_coe_units]
calc
a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹ := (Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [mul_right_comm a]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩, fun ⟨hxy, hyx⟩ =>
normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α} (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b)
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
theorem Associated.eq_of_normalized
{a b : α} (h : Associated a b) (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) :
a = b :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq ha hb h.dvd h.dvd'
@[simp]
theorem dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.dvd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.mul_right_dvd
end NormalizationMonoid
namespace Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
/-- Maps an element of `Associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : Associates α → α :=
(Quotient.lift (normalize : α → α)) fun a _ ⟨_, hu⟩ =>
hu ▸ normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (Units.mul_right_dvd.2 <| dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem out_mk (a : α) : (Associates.mk a).out = normalize a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem out_one : (1 : Associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
theorem out_mul (a b : Associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ => by
simp only [Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
theorem dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ Associates.mk a ≤ b :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
theorem out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ Associates.mk a :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
@[simp]
theorem out_top : (⊤ : Associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
@[simp]
theorem normalize_out (a : Associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn a normalize_idem
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk a.out = a :=
Quotient.inductionOn a mk_normalize
theorem out_injective : Function.Injective (Associates.out : _ → α) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective mk_out
end Associates
/-- GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with `gcd` (greatest common divisor) and
`lcm` (least common multiple) operations, determined up to a unit. The type class focuses on `gcd`
and we derive the corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- The greatest common divisor between two elements. -/
gcd : α → α → α
/-- The least common multiple between two elements. -/
lcm : α → α → α
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the first element. -/
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the second element. -/
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
/-- Any common divisor of both elements is a divisor of the GCD. -/
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
/-- The product of two elements is `Associated` with the product of their GCD and LCM. -/
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
/-- `0` is left-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
/-- `0` is right-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
/-- Normalized GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
/-- The GCD is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
/-- The LCM is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
@[simp]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_left [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_right [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
| theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique.
See `Nat.dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd` for a constructive version on `ℕ`. -/
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 468 | 479 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Path
/-!
# Path connectedness
Continuing from `Mathlib.Topology.Path`, this file defines path components and path-connected
spaces.
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
## Main theorems
* `Joined` is an equivalence relation, while `JoinedIn F` is at least symmetric and transitive.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
Furthermore, it is shown that continuous images and quotients of path-connected sets/spaces are
path-connected, and that every path-connected set/space is also connected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := h.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hxy.mem
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hyz.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
theorem JoinedIn.map_continuousOn (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := h
⟨γ.map' <| hf.mono (range_subset_iff.mpr hγ), fun t ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hγ t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.map (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
h.map_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem Topology.IsInducing.joinedIn_image {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (hx : x ∈ F)
(hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) ↔ JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨?_, (.map · hf.continuous)⟩
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ'F hγ' using hγ
have h₀ : x ⤳ γ' 0 := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.source]
have h₁ : γ' 1 ⤳ y := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.target]
have h : JoinedIn F (γ' 0) (γ' 1) := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'F⟩
simpa only [hf.continuous_iff, comp_def, hγ'] using map_continuous γ
exact (h₀.joinedIn hx (hγ'F _)).trans <| h.trans <| h₁.joinedIn (hγ'F _) hy
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.joinedIn_image := IsInducing.joinedIn_image
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
theorem mem_pathComponent_iff : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ Joined y x := .rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
theorem mem_pathComponentIn_self (h : x ∈ F) : x ∈ pathComponentIn x F :=
JoinedIn.refl h
theorem pathComponentIn_subset : pathComponentIn x F ⊆ F :=
fun _ hy ↦ hy.target_mem
theorem pathComponentIn_nonempty_iff : (pathComponentIn x F).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨γ, hγ⟩⟩ ↦ γ.source ▸ hγ 0, fun hx ↦ ⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self hx⟩⟩
theorem pathComponentIn_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponentIn y F) :
pathComponentIn x F = pathComponentIn y F := by
ext; exact ⟨h.trans, h.symm.trans⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem pathComponentIn_mono {G : Set X} (h : F ⊆ G) :
pathComponentIn x F ⊆ pathComponentIn x G :=
fun _ ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ ⟨γ, fun t ↦ h (hγ t)⟩
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (f '' F) :=
hF.image' hf.continuousOn
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
simp only [IsPathConnected, forall_mem_image, exists_mem_image]
refine exists_congr fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun hx ↦ forall₂_congr fun y hy ↦ ?_
rw [hf.joinedIn_image hx hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPathConnected_iff := IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.isInducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponentIn {s : Set X} (hs : IsPathConnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ pathComponentIn x F :=
fun y hys ↦ (hs.joinedIn x hxs y hys).mono hsF
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (h : x ∈ F) : IsPathConnected (pathComponentIn x F) :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self h, fun ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ by
refine ⟨γ, fun t ↦
⟨(γ.truncateOfLE t.2.1).cast (γ.extend_zero.symm) (γ.extend_extends' t).symm, fun t' ↦ ?_⟩⟩
dsimp [Path.truncateOfLE, Path.truncate]
exact γ.extend_extends' ⟨min (max t'.1 0) t.1, by simp [t.2.1, t.2.2]⟩ ▸ hγ _⟩
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponent : IsPathConnected (pathComponent x) := by
rw [← pathComponentIn_univ]
exact isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (mem_univ x)
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_val, inter_eq_right.2 hWU]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction n with
| zero =>
use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
| succ n hn =>
rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
apply union_subset hγ₀.2
rw [range_subset_iff]
exact hγ₁
have hpp' : ∀ k < n + 1, p k = p' k := by
intro k hk
simp only [p', hk, dif_pos]
congr
ext
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt hk]
use γ.cast (hpp' 0 n.zero_lt_succ) (hpp' n n.lt_succ_self)
simp only [γ.cast_coe]
refine And.intro hγ.2 ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
suffices p ⟨i, hi⟩ = p' i by convert hγ.1 i (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hi)
rw [← hpp' i hi]
suffices i = i % n.succ by congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), (∀ t, γ t ∈ s) ∧ ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
rcases h.exists_path_through_family p hp with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
rcases hγ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simp only [range, mem_setOf_eq] at h₂
rw [range_subset_iff] at h₁
choose! t ht using h₂
exact ⟨γ, t, h₁, ht⟩
/-! ### Path connected spaces -/
/-- A topological space is path-connected if it is non-empty and every two points can be
joined by a continuous path. -/
@[mk_iff]
class PathConnectedSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A path-connected space must be nonempty. -/
nonempty : Nonempty X
/-- Any two points in a path-connected space must be joined by a continuous path. -/
joined : ∀ x y : X, Joined x y
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy :
PathConnectedSpace X ↔ Nonempty (ZerothHomotopy X) ∧ Subsingleton (ZerothHomotopy X) := by
letI := pathSetoid X
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr h.1, ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quotient.sound (PathConnectedSpace.joined x y)
· unfold ZerothHomotopy
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
exact ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mp h, fun x y => Quotient.exact <| Subsingleton.elim ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧⟩
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
/-- Use path-connectedness to build a path between two points. -/
def somePath (x y : X) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some (joined x y)
end PathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff, isPathConnected_iff, nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
theorem isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace F := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, image_univ,
Subtype.range_val_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem isPathConnected_univ [PathConnectedSpace X] : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) :=
pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp inferInstance
theorem isPathConnected_range [PathConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact isPathConnected_univ.image hf
theorem Function.Surjective.pathConnectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : PathConnectedSpace Y := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isPathConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instPathConnectedSpace {s : Setoid X} [PathConnectedSpace X] :
PathConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.pathConnectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
/-- This is a special case of `NormedSpace.instPathConnectedSpace` (and
`IsTopologicalAddGroup.pathConnectedSpace`). It exists only to simplify dependencies. -/
instance Real.instPathConnectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace ℝ where
joined x y := ⟨⟨⟨fun (t : I) ↦ (1 - t) * x + t * y, by fun_prop⟩, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
nonempty := inferInstance
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_eq : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ∃ x : X, pathComponent x = univ := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, isPathConnected_iff_eq]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X] :
ConnectedSpace X := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent]
rcases isPathConnected_iff_eq.mp (pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp ‹_›) with ⟨x, _x_in, hx⟩
use x
rw [← univ_subset_iff]
exact (by simpa using hx : pathComponent x = univ) ▸ pathComponent_subset_component x
theorem IsPathConnected.isConnected (hF : IsPathConnected F) : IsConnected F := by
rw [isConnected_iff_connectedSpace]
rw [isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace] at hF
exact @PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace _ _ hF
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
theorem exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, h⟩
theorem exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family' p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, t, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, t, h⟩
end PathConnectedSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 725 | 727 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 1,075 | 1,079 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Defs
/-!
# Multiplicative action on the completion of a uniform space
In this file we define typeclasses `UniformContinuousConstVAdd` and
`UniformContinuousConstSMul` and prove that a multiplicative action on `X` with uniformly
continuous `(•) c` can be extended to a multiplicative action on `UniformSpace.Completion X`.
In later files once the additive group structure is set up, we provide
* `UniformSpace.Completion.DistribMulAction`
* `UniformSpace.Completion.MulActionWithZero`
* `UniformSpace.Completion.Module`
TODO: Generalise the results here from the concrete `Completion` to any `AbstractCompletion`.
-/
universe u v w x y
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w) (X : Type x) (Y : Type y) [UniformSpace X]
[UniformSpace Y]
/-- An additive action such that for all `c`, the map `fun x ↦ c +ᵥ x` is uniformly continuous. -/
class UniformContinuousConstVAdd [VAdd M X] : Prop where
uniformContinuous_const_vadd : ∀ c : M, UniformContinuous (c +ᵥ · : X → X)
/-- A multiplicative action such that for all `c`,
the map `fun x ↦ c • x` is uniformly continuous. -/
@[to_additive]
class UniformContinuousConstSMul [SMul M X] : Prop where
uniformContinuous_const_smul : ∀ c : M, UniformContinuous (c • · : X → X)
export UniformContinuousConstVAdd (uniformContinuous_const_vadd)
export UniformContinuousConstSMul (uniformContinuous_const_smul)
instance AddMonoid.uniformContinuousConstSMul_nat [AddGroup X] [IsUniformAddGroup X] :
UniformContinuousConstSMul ℕ X :=
⟨uniformContinuous_const_nsmul⟩
instance AddGroup.uniformContinuousConstSMul_int [AddGroup X] [IsUniformAddGroup X] :
UniformContinuousConstSMul ℤ X :=
⟨uniformContinuous_const_zsmul⟩
/-- A `DistribMulAction` that is continuous on a uniform group is uniformly continuous.
This can't be an instance due to it forming a loop with
`UniformContinuousConstSMul.to_continuousConstSMul` -/
theorem uniformContinuousConstSMul_of_continuousConstSMul [Monoid R] [AddGroup M]
[DistribMulAction R M] [UniformSpace M] [IsUniformAddGroup M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M] :
UniformContinuousConstSMul R M :=
⟨fun r =>
uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero (DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M r)
(Continuous.continuousAt (continuous_const_smul r))⟩
/-- The action of `Semiring.toModule` is uniformly continuous. -/
instance Ring.uniformContinuousConstSMul [Ring R] [UniformSpace R] [IsUniformAddGroup R]
[ContinuousMul R] : UniformContinuousConstSMul R R :=
uniformContinuousConstSMul_of_continuousConstSMul _ _
/-- The action of `Semiring.toOppositeModule` is uniformly continuous. -/
instance Ring.uniformContinuousConstSMul_op [Ring R] [UniformSpace R] [IsUniformAddGroup R]
[ContinuousMul R] : UniformContinuousConstSMul Rᵐᵒᵖ R :=
uniformContinuousConstSMul_of_continuousConstSMul _ _
section SMul
variable [SMul M X]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) UniformContinuousConstSMul.to_continuousConstSMul
[UniformContinuousConstSMul M X] : ContinuousConstSMul M X :=
⟨fun c => (uniformContinuous_const_smul c).continuous⟩
variable {M X Y}
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformContinuous.const_smul [UniformContinuousConstSMul M X] {f : Y → X}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (c : M) : UniformContinuous (c • f) :=
(uniformContinuous_const_smul c).comp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuousConstSMul [SMul M Y] [UniformContinuousConstSMul M Y]
{f : X → Y} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) (hsmul : ∀ (c : M) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
UniformContinuousConstSMul M X where
uniformContinuous_const_smul c := by
simpa only [hf.uniformContinuous_iff, Function.comp_def, hsmul]
using hf.uniformContinuous.const_smul c
/-- If a scalar action is central, then its right action is uniform continuous when its left action
is. -/
@[to_additive "If an additive action is central, then its right action is uniform
continuous when its left action is."]
| instance (priority := 100) UniformContinuousConstSMul.op [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X] [IsCentralScalar M X]
[UniformContinuousConstSMul M X] : UniformContinuousConstSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X :=
⟨MulOpposite.rec' fun c ↦ by simpa only [op_smul_eq_smul] using uniformContinuous_const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive]
instance MulOpposite.uniformContinuousConstSMul [UniformContinuousConstSMul M X] :
UniformContinuousConstSMul M Xᵐᵒᵖ :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/UniformMulAction.lean | 103 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Coprime elements of a ring or monoid
## Main definition
* `IsCoprime x y`: that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors (`IsRelPrime`) are not
necessarily coprime, e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime.
The two notions are equivalent in Bézout rings, see `isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime`.
This file also contains lemmas about `IsRelPrime` parallel to `IsCoprime`.
See also `RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas` for further development of coprime elements.
-/
universe u v
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (x y z : R)
/-- The proposition that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors are not necessarily coprime,
e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime. -/
def IsCoprime : Prop :=
∃ a b, a * x + b * y = 1
variable {x y z}
@[symm]
theorem IsCoprime.symm (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime y x :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H
⟨b, a, by rw [add_comm, H]⟩
theorem isCoprime_comm : IsCoprime x y ↔ IsCoprime y x :=
⟨IsCoprime.symm, IsCoprime.symm⟩
theorem isCoprime_self : IsCoprime x x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x (a + b) <| by rwa [mul_comm, add_mul], fun h =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h
⟨b, 0, by rwa [zero_mul, add_zero]⟩⟩
theorem isCoprime_zero_left : IsCoprime 0 x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, H⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x b <| by rwa [mul_zero, zero_add, mul_comm] at H, fun H =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 H
⟨1, b, by rwa [one_mul, zero_add]⟩⟩
theorem isCoprime_zero_right : IsCoprime x 0 ↔ IsUnit x :=
isCoprime_comm.trans isCoprime_zero_left
theorem not_isCoprime_zero_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬IsCoprime (0 : R) 0 :=
mt isCoprime_zero_right.mp not_isUnit_zero
lemma IsCoprime.intCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rcases h with ⟨u, v, H⟩
use u, v
rw_mod_cast [H]
exact Int.cast_one
/-- If a 2-vector `p` satisfies `IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)`, then `p ≠ 0`. -/
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {p : Fin 2 → R} (h : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (h : IsCoprime x y) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
apply not_or_of_imp
rintro rfl rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
theorem isCoprime_one_left : IsCoprime 1 x :=
⟨1, 0, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, add_zero]⟩
theorem isCoprime_one_right : IsCoprime x 1 :=
⟨0, 1, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]⟩
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ y := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← mul_one y, ← H, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ z := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← one_mul z, ← H, add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_assoc b]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : IsCoprime y z) : IsCoprime (x * y) z :=
let ⟨a, b, h1⟩ := H1
let ⟨c, d, h2⟩ := H2
⟨a * c, a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z,
calc a * c * (x * y) + (a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z) * z
_ = (a * x + b * z) * (c * y + d * z) := by ring
_ = 1 := by rw [h1, h2, mul_one]
⟩
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : IsCoprime x z) : IsCoprime x (y * z) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H1 H2 ⊢
exact H1.mul_left H2
theorem IsCoprime.mul_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (H1 : x ∣ z) (H2 : y ∣ z) : x * y ∣ z := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
rw [← mul_one z, ← h, mul_add]
apply dvd_add
· rw [mul_comm z, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2).mul_left _
· rw [mul_comm b, ← mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _).mul_right _
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime x z :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
⟨a * y, b, by rwa [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_right (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime y z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H ⊢
exact H.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left_iff : IsCoprime (x * y) z ↔ IsCoprime x z ∧ IsCoprime y z :=
⟨fun H => ⟨H.of_mul_left_left, H.of_mul_left_right⟩, fun ⟨H1, H2⟩ => H1.mul_left H2⟩
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right_iff : IsCoprime x (y * z) ↔ IsCoprime x y ∧ IsCoprime x z := by
rw [isCoprime_comm, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, isCoprime_comm, @isCoprime_comm _ _ z]
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left (h : IsCoprime y z) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime x z := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := hdvd
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left h
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_right (h : IsCoprime z y) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime z x :=
(h.symm.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left hdvd).symm
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (d : x ∣ y) : IsUnit x :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := d
isCoprime_self.1 <| IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left <| show IsCoprime x (x * k) from hk ▸ H
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' {a b x : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) (ha : x ∣ a) (hb : x ∣ b) :
IsUnit x :=
(h.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left ha).isUnit_of_dvd hb
theorem IsCoprime.isRelPrime {a b : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) : IsRelPrime a b :=
fun _ ↦ h.isUnit_of_dvd'
| theorem IsCoprime.map (H : IsCoprime x y) {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) :
IsCoprime (f x) (f y) :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Basic.lean | 163 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
| rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 332 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function -/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ` -/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element -/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ a` is the least element greater than `a` -/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function -/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred` -/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element -/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred b` is the greatest element less than `b` -/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h }
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
variable (α)
open Classical in
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun _ ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.succ_le := succ_le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMax.of_succ_le, _root_.IsMax.succ_le⟩ := succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
theorem lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (hab : b ≤ a) (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a :=
hab.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (succ_le_of_lt h) hb
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h]
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
/-- See also `Order.succ_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma le_succ_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax hab.lt.not_isMax) <| hab.lt.succ_le.lt_of_not_le hba
· exact hba.trans (le_succ _)
alias _root_.WCovBy.le_succ := le_succ_of_wcovBy
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x :=
id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_succ _ _
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
rw [← iterate_succ_apply' succ]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) :=
fun _ => (lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · ha)
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb h
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_of_le : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · <| not_isMax b)
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[gcongr] theorem succ_lt_succ (hab : a < b) : succ a < succ b := by simp [hab]
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ (a : α) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) :=
Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) :=
Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
lemma le_iff_eq_or_succ_le : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ succ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· simpa [ha.succ_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a =>
h.2.antisymm (succ_le_of_lt <| h.1.lt_of_ne <| hba.symm),
?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, le_succ b⟩
· exact ⟨le_succ a, le_rfl⟩
/-- See also `Order.le_succ_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma succ_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : succ a = b := (succ_le_of_lt h.lt).antisymm h.wcovBy.le_succ
alias _root_.CovBy.succ_eq := succ_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_succ [PartialOrder β] [SuccOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (succ a) = succ (f a) := by
by_cases h : IsMax a
· rw [h.succ_eq, (f.isMax_apply.2 h).succ_eq]
· exact (f.map_covBy.2 <| covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h).succ_eq.symm
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem succ_eq_iff_covBy : succ a = b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact covBy_succ _, CovBy.succ_eq⟩
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem succ_top : succ (⊤ : α) = ⊤ := by
rw [succ_eq_iff_isMax, isMax_iff_eq_top]
theorem succ_le_iff_eq_top : succ a ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
succ_le_iff_isMax.trans isMax_iff_eq_top
theorem lt_succ_iff_ne_top : a < succ a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.trans not_isMax_iff_ne_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem bot_lt_succ (a : α) : ⊥ < succ a :=
(lt_succ_of_not_isMax not_isMax_bot).trans_le <| succ_mono bot_le
theorem succ_ne_bot (a : α) : succ a ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_succ a).ne'
end OrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem le_of_lt_succ {a b : α} : a < succ b → a ≤ b := fun h ↦ by
by_contra! nh
exact (h.trans_le (succ_le_of_lt nh)).false
theorem lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_lt_succ, fun h => h.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha⟩
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha]
theorem succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
theorem Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ici_inter_Iic]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb,
succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb]
theorem le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : a ≤ succ b ↔ a = succ b ∨ a ≤ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· rw [hb.succ_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_eq]
· rw [← lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
(lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem not_isMin_succ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : ¬ IsMin (succ a) := by
obtain ha | ha := (le_succ a).eq_or_lt
· exact (ha ▸ succ_eq_iff_isMax.1 ha.symm).not_isMin
· exact not_isMin_of_lt ha
theorem Iic_succ (a : α) : Iic (succ a) = insert (succ a) (Iic a) :=
ext fun _ => le_succ_iff_eq_or_le
theorem Icc_succ_right (h : a ≤ succ b) : Icc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Icc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h)]
theorem Ioc_succ_right (h : a < succ b) : Ioc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Ioc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h)]
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax h
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ici, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h₁)]
| theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ioi, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h₁)]
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 452 | 455 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
/-!
# Almost everywhere measurable functions
A function is almost everywhere measurable if it coincides almost everywhere with a measurable
function. This property, called `AEMeasurable f μ`, is defined in the file `MeasureSpaceDef`.
We discuss several of its properties that are analogous to properties of measurable functions.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Filter Set Function ENNReal
variable {ι α β γ δ R : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ] {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
section
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.aemeasurable [Subsingleton α] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
Subsingleton.measurable.aemeasurable
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
(measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f).aemeasurable
@[simp, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_zero_measure : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
exact ⟨fun _ => f default, measurable_const, rfl⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem aemeasurable_id'' (μ : Measure α) {m : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) :
@AEMeasurable α α m m0 id μ :=
@Measurable.aemeasurable α α m0 m id μ (measurable_id'' hm)
lemma aemeasurable_of_map_neZero {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} (h : NeZero (μ.map f)) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
by_contra h'
simp [h'] at h
namespace AEMeasurable
|
lemma mono_ac (hf : AEMeasurable f ν) (hμν : μ ≪ ν) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, hμν.ae_le hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem mono_measure (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≤ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AEMeasurable.lean | 49 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.GeometryOfNumbers
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.VolumeOfBalls
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
/-!
# Convex Bodies
The file contains the definitions of several convex bodies lying in the mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`
associated to a number field of signature `K` and proves several existence theorems by applying
*Minkowski Convex Body Theorem* to those.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodyLT`: The set of points `x` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w` with `f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.convexBodySum`: The set of points `x` such that
`∑ w real, ‖x w‖ + 2 * ∑ w complex, ‖x w‖ ≤ B`
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_lt`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal of `K`.
Assume that `f` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodyLT K f)`, then there exists a
nonzero algebraic number `a` in `I` such that `w a < f w` for all infinite places `w`.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding.exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`: Let `I` be a fractional ideal
of `K`. Assume that `B` is such that `minkowskiBound K I < volume (convexBodySum K B)` (see
`convexBodySum_volume` for the computation of this volume), then there exists a nonzero algebraic
number `a` in `I` such that `|Norm a| < (B / d) ^ d` where `d` is the degree of `K`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace Module
section convexBodyLT
open Metric NNReal
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0)
/-- The convex body defined by `f`: the set of points `x : E` such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all
infinite places `w`. -/
abbrev convexBodyLT : Set (mixedSpace K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } => ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } => ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) ↔ ∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x < f w := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, mem_ball_zero_iff, Pi.ringHom_apply, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, Subtype.forall, ← forall₂_or_left, ← not_isReal_iff_isComplex, em,
forall_true_left, norm_embedding_eq]
theorem convexBodyLT_neg_mem (x : mixedSpace K) (hx : x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f)) :
-x ∈ (convexBodyLT K f) := by
simp only [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg] at hx ⊢
exact hx
theorem convexBodyLT_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT K f) :=
Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _))
open Fintype MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure ENNReal
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The fudge factor that appears in the formula for the volume of `convexBodyLT`. -/
noncomputable abbrev convexBodyLTFactor : ℝ≥0 :=
(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K * NNReal.pi ^ nrComplexPlaces K
theorem convexBodyLTFactor_ne_zero : convexBodyLTFactor K ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero) (pow_ne_zero _ pi_ne_zero)
theorem one_le_convexBodyLTFactor : 1 ≤ convexBodyLTFactor K :=
one_le_mul (one_le_pow₀ one_le_two) (one_le_pow₀ (one_le_two.trans Real.two_le_pi))
open scoped Classical in
/-- The volume of `(ConvexBodyLt K f)` where `convexBodyLT K f` is the set of points `x`
such that `‖x w‖ < f w` for all infinite places `w`. -/
theorem convexBodyLT_volume :
volume (convexBodyLT K f) = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
calc
_ = (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (2 * (f x.val))) *
∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2 * NNReal.pi := by
simp_rw [volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_ball, Complex.volume_ball]
_ = ((2 : ℝ≥0) ^ nrRealPlaces K
* (∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val)))
* ((∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2) *
NNReal.pi ^ nrComplexPlaces K) := by
simp_rw [ofReal_mul (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)), Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_univ, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_ofNat]
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ((∏ x : {w // InfinitePlace.IsReal w}, .ofReal (f x.val)) *
(∏ x : {w // IsComplex w}, ENNReal.ofReal (f x.val) ^ 2)) := by
simp_rw [convexBodyLTFactor, coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow]
ring
_ = (convexBodyLTFactor K) * ∏ w, (f w) ^ (mult w) := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_mul_prod, coe_mul, coe_finset_prod, mult_isReal, mult_isComplex,
pow_one, ENNReal.coe_pow, ofReal_coe_nnreal]
variable {f}
/-- This is a technical result: quite often, we want to impose conditions at all infinite places
but one and choose the value at the remaining place so that we can apply
`exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_lt`. -/
theorem adjust_f {w₁ : InfinitePlace K} (B : ℝ≥0) (hf : ∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → f w ≠ 0) :
∃ g : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0, (∀ w, w ≠ w₁ → g w = f w) ∧ ∏ w, (g w) ^ mult w = B := by
classical
let S := ∏ w ∈ Finset.univ.erase w₁, (f w) ^ mult w
refine ⟨Function.update f w₁ ((B * S⁻¹) ^ (mult w₁ : ℝ)⁻¹), ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun w hw => Function.update_of_ne hw _ f
· rw [← Finset.mul_prod_erase Finset.univ _ (Finset.mem_univ w₁), Function.update_self,
Finset.prod_congr rfl fun w hw => by rw [Function.update_of_ne (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw)],
← NNReal.rpow_natCast, ← NNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀, NNReal.rpow_one, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀, mul_one]
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
exact fun w hw => pow_ne_zero _ (hf w (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hw))
· rw [mult]; split_ifs <;> norm_num
end convexBodyLT
section convexBodyLT'
open Metric ENNReal NNReal
| variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0) (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
open scoped Classical in
/-- A version of `convexBodyLT` with an additional condition at a fixed complex place. This is
needed to ensure the element constructed is not real, see for example
`exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isComplex`.
-/
abbrev convexBodyLT' : Set (mixedSpace K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } ↦ ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } ↦
if w = w₀ then {x | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < (f w : ℝ) ^ 2} else ball 0 (f w)))
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/ConvexBody.lean | 137 | 148 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
/-!
# Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers are a sequence of rational numbers that frequently show up in
number theory.
## Mathematical overview
The Bernoulli numbers $(B_0, B_1, B_2, \ldots)=(1, -1/2, 1/6, 0, -1/30, \ldots)$ are
a sequence of rational numbers. They show up in the formula for the sums of $k$th
powers. They are related to the Taylor series expansions of $x/\tan(x)$ and
of $\coth(x)$, and also show up in the values that the Riemann Zeta function
takes both at both negative and positive integers (and hence in the
theory of modular forms). For example, if $1 \leq n$ then
$$\zeta(2n)=\sum_{t\geq1}t^{-2n}=(-1)^{n+1}\frac{(2\pi)^{2n}B_{2n}}{2(2n)!}.$$
This result is formalised in Lean: `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`.
The Bernoulli numbers can be formally defined using the power series
$$\sum B_n\frac{t^n}{n!}=\frac{t}{1-e^{-t}}$$
although that happens to not be the definition in mathlib (this is an *implementation
detail* and need not concern the mathematician).
Note that $B_1=-1/2$, meaning that we are using the $B_n^-$ of
[from Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number).
## Implementation detail
The Bernoulli numbers are defined using well-founded induction, by the formula
$$B_n=1-\sum_{k\lt n}\frac{\binom{n}{k}}{n-k+1}B_k.$$
This formula is true for all $n$ and in particular $B_0=1$. Note that this is the definition
for positive Bernoulli numbers, which we call `bernoulli'`. The negative Bernoulli numbers are
then defined as `bernoulli := (-1)^n * bernoulli'`.
## Main theorems
`sum_bernoulli : ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli k = if n = 1 then 1 else 0`
-/
open Nat Finset Finset.Nat PowerSeries
variable (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra ℚ A]
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- The Bernoulli numbers:
the $n$-th Bernoulli number $B_n$ is defined recursively via
$$B_n = 1 - \sum_{k < n} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_k}{n+1-k}$$ -/
def bernoulli' : ℕ → ℚ :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.lt_wfRel.wf fun n bernoulli' =>
1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k k.2
theorem bernoulli'_def' (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k :=
WellFounded.fix_eq _ _ _
theorem bernoulli'_def (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k ∈ range n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k := by
rw [bernoulli'_def', ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
theorem bernoulli'_spec (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose (n - k) : ℚ) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) = 1 := by
rw [sum_range_succ_comm, bernoulli'_def n, tsub_self, choose_zero_right, sub_self, zero_add,
div_one, cast_one, one_mul, sub_add, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_sub_cancel_left,
neg_eq_zero]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x hx => by rw [choose_symm (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx)), sub_self])
theorem bernoulli'_spec' (n : ℕ) :
| (∑ k ∈ antidiagonal n, ((k.1 + k.2).choose k.2 : ℚ) / (k.2 + 1) * bernoulli' k.1) = 1 := by
refine ((sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk _ n).trans ?_).trans (bernoulli'_spec n)
refine sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_of_le, mem_range_succ_iff.mp hx, cast_sub]
/-! ### Examples -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Bernoulli.lean | 83 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.IsSheafFor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# The equalizer diagram sheaf condition for a presieve
In `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean` it is defined what it means for a presheaf to be a
sheaf *for* a particular presieve. In this file we provide equivalent conditions in terms of
equalizer diagrams.
* In `Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition`, the sheaf condition at a presieve is shown to be
equivalent to that of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM (and combined with
`isSheaf_pretopology`, this shows the notions of `IsSheaf` are exactly equivalent.)
* In `Equalizer.Sieve.equalizer_sheaf_condition`, the sheaf condition at a sieve is shown to be
equivalent to that of Equation (3) p. 122 in Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92].
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
-/
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Equalizer
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max v u) {X : C} (R : Presieve X)
(S : Sieve X)
noncomputable section
/--
The middle object of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of the Stacks entry.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the middle object of the fork diagram there."]
def FirstObj : Type max v u :=
∏ᶜ fun f : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)
variable {P R}
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma FirstObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : FirstObj P R) (h : ∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(hf : R f), (Pi.π _ ⟨Y, f, hf⟩ : FirstObj P R ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ ⟨Y, f, hf⟩ : FirstObj P R ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩⟩
exact h Y f hf
variable (P R)
/-- Show that `FirstObj` is isomorphic to `FamilyOfElements`. -/
@[simps]
def firstObjEqFamily : FirstObj P R ≅ R.FamilyOfElements P where
hom t _ _ hf := Pi.π (fun f : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)) ⟨_, _, hf⟩ t
inv := Pi.lift fun f x => x _ f.2.2
instance : Inhabited (FirstObj P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
(firstObjEqFamily P _).toEquiv.inhabited
-- Porting note: was not needed in mathlib
instance : Inhabited (FirstObj P ((⊥ : Sieve X) : Presieve X)) :=
(inferInstance : Inhabited (FirstObj P (⊥ : Presieve X)))
/--
The left morphism of the fork diagram given in Equation (3) of [MM92], as well as the fork diagram
of the Stacks entry.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the left morphism of the fork diagram there."]
def forkMap : P.obj (op X) ⟶ FirstObj P R :=
Pi.lift fun f => P.map f.2.1.op
/-!
This section establishes the equivalence between the sheaf condition of Equation (3) [MM92] and
the definition of `IsSheafFor`.
-/
namespace Sieve
/-- The rightmost object of the fork diagram of Equation (3) [MM92], which contains the data used
to check a family is compatible.
-/
def SecondObj : Type max v u :=
∏ᶜ fun f : Σ (Y Z : _) (_ : Z ⟶ Y), { f' : Y ⟶ X // S f' } => P.obj (op f.2.1)
variable {P S}
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma SecondObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : SecondObj P S) (h : ∀ (Y Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(hf : S.arrows f), (Pi.π _ ⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩ : SecondObj P S ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ ⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩ : SecondObj P S ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩⟩
apply h
variable (P S)
/-- The map `p` of Equations (3,4) [MM92]. -/
def firstMap : FirstObj P (S : Presieve X) ⟶ SecondObj P S :=
Pi.lift fun fg =>
Pi.π _ (⟨_, _, S.downward_closed fg.2.2.2.2 fg.2.2.1⟩ : ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // S f })
instance : Inhabited (SecondObj P (⊥ : Sieve X)) :=
⟨firstMap _ _ default⟩
/-- The map `a` of Equations (3,4) [MM92]. -/
def secondMap : FirstObj P (S : Presieve X) ⟶ SecondObj P S :=
Pi.lift fun fg => Pi.π _ ⟨_, fg.2.2.2⟩ ≫ P.map fg.2.2.1.op
theorem w : forkMap P (S : Presieve X) ≫ firstMap P S = forkMap P S ≫ secondMap P S := by
ext
simp [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap]
/--
The family of elements given by `x : FirstObj P S` is compatible iff `firstMap` and `secondMap`
map it to the same point.
-/
theorem compatible_iff (x : FirstObj P S.arrows) :
((firstObjEqFamily P S.arrows).hom x).Compatible ↔ firstMap P S x = secondMap P S x := by
rw [Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
constructor
· intro t
apply SecondObj.ext
intros Y Z g f hf
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t _ g hf
· intro t Y Z f g hf
rw [Types.limit_ext_iff'] at t
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t ⟨⟨Y, Z, g, f, hf⟩⟩
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `S`, iff the fork given by `w` is an equalizer. -/
theorem equalizer_sheaf_condition :
Presieve.IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X) ↔ Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (w P S))) := by
rw [Types.type_equalizer_iff_unique,
← Equiv.forall_congr_right (firstObjEqFamily P (S : Presieve X)).toEquiv.symm]
simp_rw [← compatible_iff]
simp only [inv_hom_id_apply, Iso.toEquiv_symm_fun]
apply forall₂_congr
intro x _
apply existsUnique_congr
intro t
rw [← Iso.toEquiv_symm_fun]
rw [Equiv.eq_symm_apply]
constructor
· intro q
funext Y f hf
simpa [firstObjEqFamily, forkMap] using q _ _
· intro q Y f hf
rw [← q]
simp [firstObjEqFamily, forkMap]
end Sieve
/-!
This section establishes the equivalence between the sheaf condition of
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM and the definition of `isSheafFor`.
-/
namespace Presieve
variable [R.hasPullbacks]
/--
The rightmost object of the fork diagram of the Stacks entry, which
contains the data used to check a family of elements for a presieve is compatible.
-/
@[simp, stacks 00VM "This is the rightmost object of the fork diagram there."]
def SecondObj : Type max v u :=
∏ᶜ fun fg : (ΣY, { f : Y ⟶ X // R f }) × ΣZ, { g : Z ⟶ X // R g } =>
haveI := Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks fg.1.2.2 fg.2.2.2
P.obj (op (pullback fg.1.2.1 fg.2.2.1))
/-- The map `pr₀*` of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the map `pr₀*` there."]
def firstMap : FirstObj P R ⟶ SecondObj P R :=
Pi.lift fun fg =>
haveI := Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks fg.1.2.2 fg.2.2.2
Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.fst _ _).op
instance [HasPullbacks C] : Inhabited (SecondObj P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨firstMap _ _ default⟩
/-- The map `pr₁*` of the Stacks entry. -/
@[stacks 00VM "This is the map `pr₁*` there."]
def secondMap : FirstObj P R ⟶ SecondObj P R :=
Pi.lift fun fg =>
haveI := Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks fg.1.2.2 fg.2.2.2
Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.snd _ _).op
theorem w : forkMap P R ≫ firstMap P R = forkMap P R ≫ secondMap P R := by
dsimp
ext fg
simp only [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap]
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, assoc, Fan.mk_π_app]
haveI := Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks fg.1.2.2 fg.2.2.2
rw [← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, pullback.condition]
simp
/--
The family of elements given by `x : FirstObj P S` is compatible iff `firstMap` and `secondMap`
map it to the same point.
-/
theorem compatible_iff (x : FirstObj P R) :
((firstObjEqFamily P R).hom x).Compatible ↔ firstMap P R x = secondMap P R x := by
rw [Presieve.pullbackCompatible_iff]
constructor
· intro t
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩, Z, g, hg⟩
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t hf hg
· intro t Y Z f g hf hg
rw [Types.limit_ext_iff'] at t
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t ⟨⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩, Z, g, hg⟩⟩
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `R`, iff the fork given by `w` is an equalizer. -/
@[stacks 00VM]
theorem sheaf_condition : R.IsSheafFor P ↔ Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (w P R))) := by
rw [Types.type_equalizer_iff_unique,
← Equiv.forall_congr_right (firstObjEqFamily P R).toEquiv.symm]
simp_rw [← compatible_iff, ← Iso.toEquiv_fun, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
apply forall₂_congr
intro x _
apply existsUnique_congr
intro t
rw [Equiv.eq_symm_apply]
constructor
· intro q
funext Y f hf
simpa [forkMap] using q _ _
· intro q Y f hf
rw [← q]
simp [forkMap]
namespace Arrows
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) {X : C} (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X)
open Presieve
variable {B : C} {I : Type} (X : I → C) (π : (i : I) → X i ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks]
-- TODO: allow `I : Type w`
/--
The middle object of the fork diagram of the Stacks entry.
The difference between this and `Equalizer.FirstObj P (ofArrows X π)` arises if the family of
arrows `π` contains duplicates. The `Presieve.ofArrows` doesn't see those.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "The middle object of the fork diagram there."]
def FirstObj : Type w := ∏ᶜ (fun i ↦ P.obj (op (X i)))
@[ext]
lemma FirstObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : FirstObj P X) (h : ∀ i, (Pi.π _ i : FirstObj P X ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ i : FirstObj P X ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨i⟩
exact h i
/--
The rightmost object of the fork diagram of the Stacks entry.
The difference between this and `Equalizer.Presieve.SecondObj P (ofArrows X π)` arises if the
family of arrows `π` contains duplicates. The `Presieve.ofArrows` doesn't see those.
-/
@[stacks 00VM "The rightmost object of the fork diagram there."]
def SecondObj : Type w :=
∏ᶜ (fun (ij : I × I) ↦ P.obj (op (pullback (π ij.1) (π ij.2))))
@[ext]
lemma SecondObj.ext (z₁ z₂ : SecondObj P X π) (h : ∀ ij, (Pi.π _ ij : SecondObj P X π ⟶ _) z₁ =
(Pi.π _ ij : SecondObj P X π ⟶ _) z₂) : z₁ = z₂ := by
apply Limits.Types.limit_ext
rintro ⟨i⟩
exact h i
/--
The left morphism of the fork diagram.
-/
def forkMap : P.obj (op B) ⟶ FirstObj P X := Pi.lift (fun i ↦ P.map (π i).op)
/--
The first of the two parallel morphisms of the fork diagram, induced by the first projection in
each pullback.
-/
def firstMap : FirstObj P X ⟶ SecondObj P X π :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.fst _ _).op
/--
The second of the two parallel morphisms of the fork diagram, induced by the second projection in
each pullback.
-/
def secondMap : FirstObj P X ⟶ SecondObj P X π :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map (pullback.snd _ _).op
theorem w : forkMap P X π ≫ firstMap P X π = forkMap P X π ≫ secondMap P X π := by
ext x ij
simp only [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap, types_comp_apply, Types.pi_lift_π_apply,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.condition]
/--
The family of elements given by `x : FirstObj P S` is compatible iff `firstMap` and `secondMap`
map it to the same point.
-/
theorem compatible_iff (x : FirstObj P X) : (Arrows.Compatible P π ((Types.productIso _).hom x)) ↔
firstMap P X π x = secondMap P X π x := by
rw [Arrows.pullbackCompatible_iff]
constructor
· intro t
ext ij
simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t ij.1 ij.2
· intro t i j
apply_fun Pi.π (fun (ij : I × I) ↦ P.obj (op (pullback (π ij.1) (π ij.2)))) ⟨i, j⟩ at t
| simpa [firstMap, secondMap] using t
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `Presieve.ofArrows X π`, iff the fork given by `w` is an equalizer. -/
@[stacks 00VM]
theorem sheaf_condition : (Presieve.ofArrows X π).IsSheafFor P ↔
Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι (forkMap P X π) (w P X π))) := by
rw [Types.type_equalizer_iff_unique, isSheafFor_arrows_iff]
erw [← Equiv.forall_congr_right (Types.productIso _).toEquiv.symm]
simp_rw [← compatible_iff, ← Iso.toEquiv_fun, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
apply forall₂_congr
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/EqualizerSheafCondition.lean | 329 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective (map_one reverseOp)
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (map_mul reverseOp a b)
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, map_add]
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) :=
(ι_range_map_lift _ _).trans (LinearMap.range_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap
(involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, Submodule.map_pow, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_involute]
end Involute
section Reverse
theorem submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (reverseEquiv : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [reverse, reverseOp, Submodule.map_comp, ι_range_map_lift, LinearMap.range_comp,
← Submodule.map_comp]
exact Submodule.map_id _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, ι_range_map_reverse]
/-- Like `Submodule.map_mul`, but with the multiplication reversed. -/
theorem submodule_map_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_mul, Submodule.map_unop_mul]
theorem submodule_comap_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_mul_reverse]
| /-- Like `Submodule.map_pow` -/
theorem submodule_map_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_pow, Submodule.map_unop_pow]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 258 | 263 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.RegularMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
/-!
# Categories where inclusions into coproducts are monomorphisms
If `C` is a category, the class `MonoCoprod C` expresses that left
inclusions `A ⟶ A ⨿ B` are monomorphisms when `HasCoproduct A B`
is satisfied. If it is so, it is shown that right inclusions are
also monomorphisms.
More generally, we deduce that when suitable coproducts exists, then
if `X : I → C` and `ι : J → I` is an injective map,
then the canonical morphism `∐ (X ∘ ι) ⟶ ∐ X` is a monomorphism.
It also follows that for any `i : I`, `Sigma.ι X i : X i ⟶ ∐ X` is
a monomorphism.
TODO: define distributive categories, and show that they satisfy `MonoCoprod`, see
<https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/published/distributivity+implies+monicity+of+coproduct+inclusions>
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
/-- This condition expresses that inclusion morphisms into coproducts are monomorphisms. -/
class MonoCoprod : Prop where
/-- the left inclusion of a colimit binary cofan is mono -/
binaryCofan_inl : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (c : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c), Mono c.inl
variable {C}
instance (priority := 100) monoCoprodOfHasZeroMorphisms [HasZeroMorphisms C] : MonoCoprod C :=
⟨fun A B c hc => by
haveI : IsSplitMono c.inl :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (SplitMono.mk (hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 A) 0)) (IsColimit.fac _ _ _))
infer_instance⟩
namespace MonoCoprod
theorem binaryCofan_inr {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] (c : BinaryCofan A B) (hc : IsColimit c) :
Mono c.inr := by
haveI hc' : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f₁ f₂ => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk f₂ f₁))
(by simp) (by simp)
(fun f₁ f₂ m h₁ h₂ => BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat))
exact binaryCofan_inl _ hc'
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inl : A ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inl _ (colimit.isColimit _)
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inr : B ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inr _ (colimit.isColimit _)
theorem mono_inl_iff {A B : C} {c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B} (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) :
Mono c₁.inl ↔ Mono c₂.inl := by
suffices
∀ (c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c₁) (_ : IsColimit c₂) (_ : Mono c₁.inl),
Mono c₂.inl
by exact ⟨fun h₁ => this _ _ hc₁ hc₂ h₁, fun h₂ => this _ _ hc₂ hc₁ h₂⟩
intro c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂
intro
simpa only [IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom] using
mono_comp c₁.inl (hc₁.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc₂).hom
theorem mk' (h : ∀ A B : C, ∃ (c : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c), Mono c.inl) : MonoCoprod C :=
⟨fun A B c' hc' => by
obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := h A B
simpa only [mono_inl_iff hc' hc₁] using hc₂⟩
instance monoCoprodType : MonoCoprod (Type u) :=
MonoCoprod.mk' fun A B => by
refine ⟨BinaryCofan.mk (Sum.inl : A ⟶ A ⊕ B) Sum.inr, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _
(fun f₁ f₂ x => by
rcases x with x | x
exacts [f₁ x, f₂ x])
(fun f₁ f₂ => by rfl)
(fun f₁ f₂ => by rfl)
(fun f₁ f₂ m h₁ h₂ => by
funext x
rcases x with x | x
· exact congr_fun h₁ x
· exact congr_fun h₂ x)
· rw [mono_iff_injective]
intro a₁ a₂ h
simpa using h
section
variable {I₁ I₂ : Type*} {X : I₁ ⊕ I₂ → C} (c : Cofan X)
(c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ Sum.inl)) (c₂ : Cofan (X ∘ Sum.inr))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂)
include hc hc₁ hc₂
/-- Given a family of objects `X : I₁ ⊕ I₂ → C`, a cofan of `X`, and two colimit cofans
of `X ∘ Sum.inl` and `X ∘ Sum.inr`, this is a cofan for `c₁.pt` and `c₂.pt` whose
point is `c.pt`. -/
@[simp]
def binaryCofanSum : BinaryCofan c₁.pt c₂.pt :=
BinaryCofan.mk (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i₁ => c.inj (Sum.inl i₁)))
(Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₂ (fun i₂ => c.inj (Sum.inr i₂)))
/-- The binary cofan `binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂` is colimit. -/
def isColimitBinaryCofanSum : IsColimit (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂) :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc (fun i => match i with
| Sum.inl i₁ => c₁.inj i₁ ≫ f₁
| Sum.inr i₂ => c₂.inj i₂ ≫ f₂))
(fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₁ _ _ (by simp))
(fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₂ _ _ (by simp))
(fun f₁ f₂ m hm₁ hm₂ => by
apply Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
rintro (i₁|i₂) <;> aesop_cat)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inl [MonoCoprod C] :
Mono (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inl :=
MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inl _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inr [MonoCoprod C] :
Mono (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inr :=
MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inr _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inl' [MonoCoprod C] (inl : c₁.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(hinl : ∀ (i₁ : I₁), c₁.inj i₁ ≫ inl = c.inj (Sum.inl i₁)) :
Mono inl := by
suffices inl = (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inl by
rw [this]
exact MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inl _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
exact Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₁ _ _ (by simpa using hinl)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inr' [MonoCoprod C] (inr : c₂.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(hinr : ∀ (i₂ : I₂), c₂.inj i₂ ≫ inr = c.inj (Sum.inr i₂)) :
Mono inr := by
suffices inr = (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inr by
rw [this]
exact MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inr _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
exact Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₂ _ _ (by simpa using hinr)
end
section
variable [MonoCoprod C] {I J : Type*} (X : I → C) (ι : J → I)
lemma mono_of_injective_aux (hι : Function.Injective ι) (c : Cofan X) (c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ ι))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(c₂ : Cofan (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1))
(hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) : Mono (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i => c.inj (ι i))) := by
classical
let e := ((Equiv.ofInjective ι hι).sumCongr (Equiv.refl _)).trans (Equiv.Set.sumCompl _)
refine mono_binaryCofanSum_inl' (Cofan.mk c.pt (fun i' => c.inj (e i'))) _ _ ?_
hc₁ hc₂ _ (by simp [e])
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ((IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (Cocones.equivalenceOfReindexing
(Discrete.equivalence e) (Iso.refl _))).symm hc) (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _))
variable (hι : Function.Injective ι) (c : Cofan X) (c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ ι))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
include hι
include hc in
lemma mono_of_injective [HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i => c.inj (ι i))) :=
mono_of_injective_aux X ι hι c c₁ hc hc₁ _ (colimit.isColimit _)
lemma mono_of_injective' [HasCoproduct (X ∘ ι)] [HasCoproduct X]
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Sigma.desc (f := X ∘ ι) (fun j => Sigma.ι X (ι j))) :=
mono_of_injective X ι hι _ _ (colimit.isColimit _) (colimit.isColimit _)
lemma mono_map'_of_injective [HasCoproduct (X ∘ ι)] [HasCoproduct X]
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Sigma.map' ι (fun j => 𝟙 ((X ∘ ι) j))) := by
convert mono_of_injective' X ι hι
apply Sigma.hom_ext
intro j
| rw [Sigma.ι_comp_map', id_comp, colimit.ι_desc]
simp
end
section
variable [MonoCoprod C] {I : Type*} (X : I → C)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/MonoCoprod.lean | 194 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Center
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# `NonUnitalSubring`s
Let `R` be a non-unital ring.
We prove that non-unital subrings are a complete lattice, and that you can `map` (pushforward) and
`comap` (pull back) them along ring homomorphisms.
We define the `closure` construction from `Set R` to `NonUnitalSubring R`, sending a subset of
`R` to the non-unital subring it generates, and prove that it is a Galois insertion.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
`(R : Type u) [NonUnitalRing R] (S : Type u) [NonUnitalRing S] (f g : R →ₙ+* S)`
`(A : NonUnitalSubring R) (B : NonUnitalSubring S) (s : Set R)`
* `instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubring R)` : the complete lattice structure on the
non-unital subrings.
* `NonUnitalSubring.center` : the center of a non-unital ring `R`.
* `NonUnitalSubring.closure` : non-unital subring closure of a set, i.e., the smallest
non-unital subring that includes the set.
* `NonUnitalSubring.gi` : `closure : Set M → NonUnitalSubring M` and coercion
`coe : NonUnitalSubring M → Set M`
form a `GaloisInsertion`.
* `comap f B : NonUnitalSubring A` : the preimage of a non-unital subring `B` along the
non-unital ring homomorphism `f`
* `map f A : NonUnitalSubring B` : the image of a non-unital subring `A` along the
non-unital ring homomorphism `f`.
* `Prod A B : NonUnitalSubring (R × S)` : the product of non-unital subrings
* `f.range : NonUnitalSubring B` : the range of the non-unital ring homomorphism `f`.
* `eq_locus f g : NonUnitalSubring R` : given non-unital ring homomorphisms `f g : R →ₙ+* S`,
the non-unital subring of `R` where `f x = g x`
## Implementation notes
A non-unital subring is implemented as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring` which is also an
additive subgroup.
Lattice inclusion (e.g. `≤` and `⊓`) is used rather than set notation (`⊆` and `∩`), although
`∈` is defined as membership of a non-unital subring's underlying set.
## Tags
non-unital subring
-/
universe u v w
section Basic
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R]
namespace NonUnitalSubring
variable (s : NonUnitalSubring R)
/-- Sum of a list of elements in a non-unital subring is in the non-unital subring. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List R} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s) → l.sum ∈ s :=
list_sum_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in a `NonUnitalSubring` of a `NonUnitalRing` is
in the `NonUnitalSubring`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem {R} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] (s : NonUnitalSubring R)
(m : Multiset R) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s) → m.sum ∈ s :=
multiset_sum_mem _
/-- Sum of elements in a `NonUnitalSubring` of a `NonUnitalRing` indexed by a `Finset`
is in the `NonUnitalSubring`. -/
protected theorem sum_mem {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] (s : NonUnitalSubring R)
{ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ s :=
sum_mem h
/-! ## top -/
/-- The non-unital subring `R` of the ring `R`. -/
instance : Top (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Subsemigroup R), (⊤ : AddSubgroup R) with }⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : R) : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
rfl
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `NonUnitalSubring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R) ≃+* R := NonUnitalSubsemiring.topEquiv
end NonUnitalSubring
end Basic
section Hom
namespace NonUnitalSubring
variable {F : Type w} {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type*}
[NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing T]
[FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S] (s : NonUnitalSubring R)
/-! ## comap -/
/-- The preimage of a `NonUnitalSubring` along a ring homomorphism is a `NonUnitalSubring`. -/
def comap {F : Type w} {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S]
[FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S] (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubring S) :
NonUnitalSubring R :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.comap (f : R →ₙ* S), s.toAddSubgroup.comap (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f ⁻¹' s.carrier }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : NonUnitalSubring S) (f : F) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : NonUnitalSubring S} {f : F} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_comap (s : NonUnitalSubring T) (g : S →ₙ+* T) (f : R →ₙ+* S) :
(s.comap g).comap f = s.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
/-! ## map -/
/-- The image of a `NonUnitalSubring` along a ring homomorphism is a `NonUnitalSubring`. -/
def map {F : Type w} {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S]
[FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S] (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubring R) :
NonUnitalSubring S :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.map (f : R →ₙ* S), s.toAddSubgroup.map (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f '' s.carrier }
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y :=
Set.mem_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (NonUnitalRingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (g : S →ₙ+* T) (f : R →ₙ+* S) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubring R} {t : NonUnitalSubring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
GaloisConnection (map f : NonUnitalSubring R → NonUnitalSubring S) (comap f) := fun _S _T =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
/-- A `NonUnitalSubring` is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective (f : R → S)) :
s ≃+* s.map f :=
{
Equiv.Set.image f s
hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_mul f _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_add f _ _) }
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
end NonUnitalSubring
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type*}
[NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing T]
(g : S →ₙ+* T) (f : R →ₙ+* S)
/-! ## range -/
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism, as a `NonUnitalSubring` of the target.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S]
(f : R →ₙ+* S) : NonUnitalSubring S :=
((⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R).map f).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_range : (f.range : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : R →ₙ+* S} {y : S} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem range_eq_map (f : R →ₙ+* S) : f.range = NonUnitalSubring.map f ⊤ := by ext; simp
theorem mem_range_self (f : R →ₙ+* S) (x : R) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
theorem map_range : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R).map_map g f
/-- The range of a ring homomorphism is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype S`. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype R] [DecidableEq S] (f : R →ₙ+* S) : Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
end NonUnitalRingHom
namespace NonUnitalSubring
section Order
variable {R : Type u} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R]
/-! ## bot -/
instance : Bot (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
⟨(0 : R →ₙ+* R).range⟩
instance : Inhabited (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
⟨⊥⟩
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) = {0} :=
(NonUnitalRingHom.coe_range (0 : R →ₙ+* R)).trans (@Set.range_const R R _ 0)
theorem mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : NonUnitalSubring R) ↔ x = 0 :=
show x ∈ ((⊥ : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) ↔ x = 0 by rw [coe_bot, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
/-! ## inf -/
/-- The inf of two `NonUnitalSubring`s is their intersection. -/
instance : Min (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
⟨fun s t =>
{ s.toSubsemigroup ⊓ t.toSubsemigroup, s.toAddSubgroup ⊓ t.toAddSubgroup with
carrier := s ∩ t }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : NonUnitalSubring R) :
((p ⊓ p' : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) = (p : Set R) ∩ p' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : NonUnitalSubring R} {x : R} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
NonUnitalSubring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubring.toSubsemigroup t)
(⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubring.toAddSubgroup t) (by simp) (by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)) :
((sInf S : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → NonUnitalSubring R} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set R) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → NonUnitalSubring R} {x : R} :
(x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubsemigroup (s : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubsemigroup = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubring.toSubsemigroup t :=
mk'_toSubsemigroup _ _
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubgroup (s : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubgroup = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubring.toAddSubgroup t :=
mk'_toAddSubgroup _ _
/-- `NonUnitalSubring`s of a ring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (NonUnitalSubring R) fun _s =>
IsGLB.of_image (@fun _ _ : NonUnitalSubring R => SetLike.coe_subset_coe)
isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _x hx => (mem_bot.mp hx).symm ▸ zero_mem s
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_inf := fun _s _t₁ _t₂ h₁ h₂ _x hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : NonUnitalSubring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
end Order
/-! ## Center of a ring -/
section Center
variable {R : Type u}
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable (R) [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R]
/-- The center of a ring `R` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `R` -/
def center : NonUnitalSubring R :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiring.center R with
neg_mem' := Set.neg_mem_center }
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_toNonUnitalSubsemiring :
(center R).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = NonUnitalSubsemiring.center R :=
rfl
/-- The center is commutative and associative. -/
instance center.instNonUnitalCommRing : NonUnitalCommRing (center R) :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiring.center.instNonUnitalCommSemiring R,
inferInstanceAs <| NonUnitalNonAssocRing (center R) with }
variable {R}
/-- The center of isomorphic (not necessarily unital or associative) rings are isomorphic. -/
@[simps!] def centerCongr {S} [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S] (e : R ≃+* S) : center R ≃+* center S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.centerCongr e
/-- The center of a (not necessarily uintal or associative) ring
is isomorphic to the center of its opposite. -/
@[simps!] def centerToMulOpposite : center R ≃+* center Rᵐᵒᵖ :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.centerToMulOpposite
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section NonUnitalRing
variable [NonUnitalRing R]
-- no instance diamond, unlike the unital version
example : (center.instNonUnitalCommRing _).toNonUnitalRing =
NonUnitalSubringClass.toNonUnitalRing (center R) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem mem_center_iff {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := Subsemigroup.mem_center_iff
instance decidableMemCenter [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] : DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [NonUnitalCommRing R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
end NonUnitalRing
end Center
/-! ## `NonUnitalSubring` closure of a subset -/
variable {F : Type w} {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
[NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S]
[FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
/-- The `NonUnitalSubring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : NonUnitalSubring R :=
sInf {S | s ⊆ S}
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : NonUnitalSubring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
/-- The `NonUnitalSubring` generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _x hx => mem_closure.2 fun _S hS => hS hx
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
/-- A `NonUnitalSubring` `t` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
/-- `NonUnitalSubring` closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ≤ closure s) :
closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `0`, `1`, and all elements
of `s`, and is preserved under addition, negation, and multiplication, then `p` holds for all
elements of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {s : Set R} {p : (x : R) → x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure hx)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(neg : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p (-x) (neg_mem hx))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
{x} (hx : x ∈ closure s) : p x hx :=
let K : NonUnitalSubring R :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
add_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
neg_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ↦ ⟨_, neg _ _ hpx⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
closure_le (t := K) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_closure hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
/-- An induction principle for closure membership, for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction₂ {s : Set R} {p : (x y : R) → x ∈ closure s → y ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_closure hx) (subset_closure hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(neg_left : ∀ x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p (-x) y (neg_mem hx) hy)
(neg_right : ∀ x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p x (-y) hx (neg_mem hy))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
{x y : R} (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using closure_induction with
| mem z hz => induction hx using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ _ h hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| neg _ _ h => exact neg_left _ _ _ _ h
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| neg _ _ h => exact neg_right _ _ _ _ h
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ x ∈ AddSubgroup.closure (Subsemigroup.closure s : Set R) :=
⟨fun h => by
induction h using closure_induction with
| mem _ hx => exact AddSubgroup.subset_closure (Subsemigroup.subset_closure hx)
| zero => exact zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ hx hy => exact add_mem hx hy
| neg x _ hx => exact neg_mem hx
| mul _ _ _hx _hy hx hy =>
clear _hx _hy
induction hx, hy using AddSubgroup.closure_induction₂ with
| mem _ _ hx hy => exact AddSubgroup.subset_closure (mul_mem hx hy)
| one_left => simpa using zero_mem _
| one_right => simpa using zero_mem _
| mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => simpa [add_mul] using add_mem h₁ h₂
| mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => simpa [mul_add] using add_mem h₁ h₂
| inv_left _ _ _ _ h => simpa [neg_mul] using neg_mem h
| inv_right _ _ _ _ h => simpa [mul_neg] using neg_mem h,
fun h => by
induction h using AddSubgroup.closure_induction with
| mem _ hx => induction hx using Subsemigroup.closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact subset_closure h
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_mem h₁ h₂
| one => exact zero_mem _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_mem h₁ h₂
| inv _ _ h => exact neg_mem h⟩
/-- If all elements of `s : Set A` commute pairwise, then `closure s` is a commutative ring. -/
def closureNonUnitalCommRingOfComm {R : Type u} [NonUnitalRing R] {s : Set R}
(hcomm : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a * b = b * a) : NonUnitalCommRing (closure s) :=
{ (closure s).toNonUnitalRing with
mul_comm := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ => by
ext
simp only [MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk]
induction hx, hy using closure_induction₂ with
| mem_mem x y hx hy => exact hcomm x hx y hy
| zero_left x _ => exact Commute.zero_left x
| zero_right x _ => exact Commute.zero_right x
| mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact Commute.mul_left h₁ h₂
| mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact Commute.mul_right h₁ h₂
| add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact Commute.add_left h₁ h₂
| add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact Commute.add_right h₁ h₂
| neg_left _ _ _ _ h => exact Commute.neg_left h
| neg_right _ _ _ _ h => exact Commute.neg_right h }
variable (R) in
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure R _) SetLike.coe where
choice s _ := closure s
gc _s _t := closure_le
le_l_u _s := subset_closure
choice_eq _s _h := rfl
/-- Closure of a `NonUnitalSubring` `S` equals `S`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_eq (s : NonUnitalSubring R) : closure (s : Set R) = s :=
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).l_u_eq s
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set R) = ⊥ :=
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).gc.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (Set.univ : Set R) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top R _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
theorem closure_union (s t : Set R) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).gc.l_sup
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set R) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).gc.l_iSup
theorem closure_sUnion (s : Set (Set R)) : closure (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, closure t :=
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).gc.l_sSup
theorem map_sup (s t : NonUnitalSubring R) (f : F) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → NonUnitalSubring R) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
theorem map_inf (s t : NonUnitalSubring R) (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s ⊓ t).map f = s.map f ⊓ t.map f := SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
theorem map_iInf {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : ι → NonUnitalSubring R) : (iInf s).map f = ⨅ i, (s i).map f := by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
simpa using (Set.injOn_of_injective hf).image_iInter_eq (s := SetLike.coe ∘ s)
theorem comap_inf (s t : NonUnitalSubring S) (f : F) : (s ⊓ t).comap f = s.comap f ⊓ t.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → NonUnitalSubring S) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : R →ₙ+* S) : (⊥ : NonUnitalSubring R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : R →ₙ+* S) : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
/-- Given `NonUnitalSubring`s `s`, `t` of rings `R`, `S` respectively, `s.prod t` is `s ×ˢ t`
as a `NonUnitalSubring` of `R × S`. -/
def prod (s : NonUnitalSubring R) (t : NonUnitalSubring S) : NonUnitalSubring (R × S) :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.prod t.toSubsemigroup, s.toAddSubgroup.prod t.toAddSubgroup with
carrier := s ×ˢ t }
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : NonUnitalSubring R) (t : NonUnitalSubring S) :
(s.prod t : Set (R × S)) = (s : Set R) ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem mem_prod {s : NonUnitalSubring R} {t : NonUnitalSubring S} {p : R × S} :
p ∈ s.prod t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
@[mono]
theorem prod_mono ⦃s₁ s₂ : NonUnitalSubring R⦄ (hs : s₁ ≤ s₂) ⦃t₁ t₂ : NonUnitalSubring S⦄
(ht : t₁ ≤ t₂) : s₁.prod t₁ ≤ s₂.prod t₂ :=
Set.prod_mono hs ht
theorem prod_mono_right (s : NonUnitalSubring R) :
Monotone fun t : NonUnitalSubring S => s.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl s)
theorem prod_mono_left (t : NonUnitalSubring S) : Monotone fun s : NonUnitalSubring R => s.prod t :=
fun _s₁ _s₂ hs => prod_mono hs (le_refl t)
theorem prod_top (s : NonUnitalSubring R) :
s.prod (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring S) = s.comap (NonUnitalRingHom.fst R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
theorem top_prod (s : NonUnitalSubring S) :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R).prod s = s.comap (NonUnitalRingHom.snd R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[simp]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R).prod (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring S) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
/-- Product of `NonUnitalSubring`s is isomorphic to their product as rings. -/
def prodEquiv (s : NonUnitalSubring R) (t : NonUnitalSubring S) : s.prod t ≃+* s × t :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (s : Set R) (t : Set S) with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- The underlying set of a non-empty directed Sup of `NonUnitalSubring`s is just a union of the
`NonUnitalSubring`s. Note that this fails without the directedness assumption (the union of two
`NonUnitalSubring`s is typically not a `NonUnitalSubring`) -/
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → NonUnitalSubring R}
(hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) {x : R} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup S i hi⟩
let U : NonUnitalSubring R :=
NonUnitalSubring.mk' (⋃ i, (S i : Set R)) (⨆ i, (S i).toSubsemigroup) (⨆ i, (S i).toAddSubgroup)
(Subsemigroup.coe_iSup_of_directed hS) (AddSubgroup.coe_iSup_of_directed hS)
suffices ⨆ i, S i ≤ U by simpa [U] using @this x
exact iSup_le fun i x hx ↦ Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx⟩
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] {S : ι → NonUnitalSubring R}
(hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) : ((⨆ i, S i : NonUnitalSubring R) : Set R) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) {x : R} : x ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := by
haveI : Nonempty S := Sne.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hS.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
theorem coe_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (NonUnitalSubring R)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) : (↑(sSup S) : Set R) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp [mem_sSup_of_directedOn Sne hS]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : R ≃+* S} {K : NonUnitalSubring R} {x : S} :
x ∈ K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K :=
@Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (K : Set R) f.toEquiv x
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubring R) :
K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.comap f.symm :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubring S) :
K.comap (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
end NonUnitalSubring
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
[NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S]
open NonUnitalSubring
/-- Restriction of a ring homomorphism to its range interpreted as a `NonUnitalSubring`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
def rangeRestrict (f : R →ₙ+* S) : R →ₙ+* f.range :=
NonUnitalRingHom.codRestrict f f.range fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_rangeRestrict (f : R →ₙ+* S) (x : R) : (f.rangeRestrict x : S) = f x :=
rfl
theorem rangeRestrict_surjective (f : R →ₙ+* S) : Function.Surjective f.rangeRestrict :=
fun ⟨_y, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := mem_range.mp hy
⟨x, Subtype.ext hx⟩
theorem range_eq_top {f : R →ₙ+* S} :
f.range = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring S) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans <| Iff.trans (by rw [coe_range, coe_top]) Set.range_eq_univ
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_top_iff_surjective := range_eq_top
/-- The range of a surjective ring homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_top_of_surjective (f : R →ₙ+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
f.range = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring S) :=
range_eq_top.2 hf
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_top_of_surjective := range_eq_top_of_surjective
/-- The `NonUnitalSubring` of elements `x : R` such that `f x = g x`, i.e.,
the equalizer of f and g as a `NonUnitalSubring` of R -/
def eqLocus (f g : R →ₙ+* S) : NonUnitalSubring R :=
{ (f : R →ₙ* S).eqLocus g, (f : R →+ S).eqLocus g with carrier := {x | f x = g x} }
@[simp]
theorem eqLocus_same (f : R →ₙ+* S) : f.eqLocus f = ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext fun _ => eq_self_iff_true _
/-- If two ring homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its
`NonUnitalSubring` closure. -/
theorem eqOn_set_closure {f g : R →ₙ+* S} {s : Set R} (h : Set.EqOn f g s) :
Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eqLocus g from closure_le.2 h
theorem eq_of_eqOn_set_top {f g : R →ₙ+* S} (h : Set.EqOn f g (⊤ : NonUnitalSubring R)) : f = g :=
ext fun _x => h trivial
theorem eq_of_eqOn_set_dense {s : Set R} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : R →ₙ+* S} (h : s.EqOn f g) :
f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_set_top <| hs ▸ eqOn_set_closure h
theorem closure_preimage_le (f : R →ₙ+* S) (s : Set S) : closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
| closure_le.2 fun _x hx => SetLike.mem_coe.2 <| mem_comap.2 <| subset_closure hx
/-- The image under a ring homomorphism of the `NonUnitalSubring` generated by a set equals
the `NonUnitalSubring` generated by the image of the set. -/
theorem map_closure (f : R →ₙ+* S) (s : Set R) : (closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) (NonUnitalSubring.gi S).gc
(NonUnitalSubring.gi R).gc fun _ ↦ rfl
end NonUnitalRingHom
namespace NonUnitalSubring
| Mathlib/RingTheory/NonUnitalSubring/Basic.lean | 706 | 717 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
/-!
# Bicategories
In this file we define typeclass for bicategories.
A bicategory `B` consists of
* objects `a : B`,
* 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`, and
* 2-morphisms `η : f ⟶ g` between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`.
We use `u`, `v`, and `w` as the universe variables for objects, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms,
respectively.
A typeclass for bicategories extends `CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct` typeclass. This means that
we have
* a composition `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c` for each 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c`, and
* an identity `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a` for each object `a : B`.
For each object `a b : B`, the collection of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` has a category structure. The
2-morphisms in the bicategory are implemented as the morphisms in this family of categories.
The composition of 1-morphisms is in fact an object part of a functor
`(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. The definition of bicategories in this file does not
require this functor directly. Instead, it requires the whiskering functions. For a 1-morphism
`f : a ⟶ b` and a 2-morphism `η : g ⟶ h` between 1-morphisms `g h : b ⟶ c`, there is a
2-morphism `whiskerLeft f η : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h`. Similarly, for a 2-morphism `η : f ⟶ g`
between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` and a 1-morphism `f : b ⟶ c`, there is a 2-morphism
`whiskerRight η h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h`. These satisfy the exchange law
`whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ`,
which is required as an axiom in the definition here.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- In a bicategory, we can compose the 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c` to obtain
a 1-morphism `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c`. This composition does not need to be strictly associative,
but there is a specified associator, `α_ f g h : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ (g ≫ h)`.
There is an identity 1-morphism `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a`, with specified left and right unitor
isomorphisms `λ_ f : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` and `ρ_ f : f ≫ 𝟙 a ≅ f`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bicategory.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
/-- The category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms -/
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
/-- Left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
/-- Right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
/-- The associator isomorphism: `(f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h` -/
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` -/
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
/-- The right unitor: `f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f` -/
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
namespace Bicategory
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
/-!
### Simp-normal form for 2-morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any 2-morphisms into simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is also useful when applying (forthcoming)
`coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of 2-morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of 2-morphisms like `η₁ ≫ η₂ ≫ η₃ ≫ η₄ ≫ η₅` such that each `ηᵢ` is
either a structural 2-morphisms (2-morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural 2-morphisms, and
2. each non-structural 2-morphism in the composition is of the form `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅`,
where each `fᵢ` is a 1-morphism that is not the identity or a composite and `η` is a
non-structural 2-morphisms that is also not the identity or a composite.
Note that `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅` is actually `f₁ ◁ (f₂ ◁ (f₃ ◁ ((η ▷ f₄) ▷ f₅)))`.
-/
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
/-
The following simp attributes are put in order to rewrite any 2-morphisms into normal forms. There
are associators and unitors in the RHS in the several simp lemmas here (e.g. `id_whiskerLeft`),
which at first glance look more complicated than the LHS, but they will be eventually reduced by
the pentagon or the triangle identities, and more generally, (forthcoming) `coherence` tactic.
-/
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
/-- The right whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
(f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ η ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
(f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ g ◁ η := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_whiskerLeft_symm (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom = (λ_ f).hom ≫ η := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (λ_ g).inv = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η := by simp
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ≫ η := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : 𝟙 a ◁ η = 𝟙 a ◁ θ ↔ η = θ := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : η ▷ 𝟙 b = θ ▷ 𝟙 b ↔ η = θ := by simp
/-- We state it as a simp lemma, which is regarded as an involved version of
`id_whiskerRight f g : 𝟙 f ▷ g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g)`.
-/
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).hom ▷ g = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).hom ≫ (λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).inv ▷ g = (λ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).hom = (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
/-
It is not so obvious whether `leftUnitor_whiskerRight` or `leftUnitor_comp` should be a simp
lemma. Our choice is the former. One reason is that the latter yields the following loop:
[id_whiskerLeft] : 𝟙 a ◁ (ρ_ f).hom ==> (λ_ (f ≫ 𝟙 b)).hom ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ≫ (λ_ f).inv
[leftUnitor_comp] : (λ_ (f ≫ 𝟙 b)).hom ==> (α_ (𝟙 a) f (𝟙 b)).inv ≫ (λ_ f).hom ▷ 𝟙 b
[whiskerRight_id] : (λ_ f).hom ▷ 𝟙 b ==> (ρ_ (𝟙 a ≫ f)).hom ≫ (λ_ f).hom ≫ (ρ_ f).inv
[rightUnitor_comp] : (ρ_ (𝟙 a ≫ f)).hom ==> (α_ (𝟙 a) f (𝟙 b)).hom ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ (ρ_ f).hom
-/
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_comp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv ≫ (λ_ f).hom ▷ g := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_comp_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ (f ≫ g)).inv = (λ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_comp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ (f ≫ g)).hom = (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).hom ≫ f ◁ (ρ_ g).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_comp_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ (f ≫ g)).inv = f ◁ (ρ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).inv := by simp
@[simp]
theorem unitors_equal : (λ_ (𝟙 a)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙 a)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ← cancel_mono (ρ_ _).hom, triangle, ←
rightUnitor_comp, rightUnitor_naturality]
@[simp]
theorem unitors_inv_equal : (λ_ (𝟙 a)).inv = (ρ_ (𝟙 a)).inv := by simp [Iso.inv_eq_inv]
section
attribute [local simp] whisker_exchange
/-- Precomposition of a 1-morphism as a functor. -/
@[simps]
def precomp (c : B) (f : a ⟶ b) : (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c) where
obj := (f ≫ ·)
map := (f ◁ ·)
/-- Precomposition of a 1-morphism as a functor from the category of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` into the
category of functors `(b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. -/
@[simps]
def precomposing (a b c : B) : (a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c) where
obj f := precomp c f
map η := { app := (η ▷ ·) }
/-- Postcomposition of a 1-morphism as a functor. -/
@[simps]
def postcomp (a : B) (f : b ⟶ c) : (a ⟶ b) ⥤ (a ⟶ c) where
obj := (· ≫ f)
map := (· ▷ f)
/-- Postcomposition of a 1-morphism as a functor from the category of 1-morphisms `b ⟶ c` into the
category of functors `(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. -/
@[simps]
def postcomposing (a b c : B) : (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ b) ⥤ (a ⟶ c) where
obj f := postcomp a f
map η := { app := (· ◁ η) }
/-- Left component of the associator as a natural isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def associatorNatIsoLeft (a : B) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
(postcomposing a ..).obj g ⋙ (postcomposing ..).obj h ≅ (postcomposing ..).obj (g ≫ h) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (α_ · g h)
/-- Middle component of the associator as a natural isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def associatorNatIsoMiddle (f : a ⟶ b) (h : c ⟶ d) :
(precomposing ..).obj f ⋙ (postcomposing ..).obj h ≅
(postcomposing ..).obj h ⋙ (precomposing ..).obj f :=
NatIso.ofComponents (α_ f · h)
/-- Right component of the associator as a natural isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def associatorNatIsoRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (d : B) :
(precomposing _ _ d).obj (f ≫ g) ≅ (precomposing ..).obj g ⋙ (precomposing ..).obj f :=
NatIso.ofComponents (α_ f g ·)
/-- Left unitor as a natural isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def leftUnitorNatIso (a b : B) : (precomposing _ _ b).obj (𝟙 a) ≅ 𝟭 (a ⟶ b) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (λ_ ·)
/-- Right unitor as a natural isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def rightUnitorNatIso (a b : B) : (postcomposing a _ _).obj (𝟙 b) ≅ 𝟭 (a ⟶ b) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (ρ_ ·)
end
| end Bicategory
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 479 | 481 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Torsion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Smeval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Data.NNRat.Order
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Binomial rings
In this file we introduce the binomial property as a mixin, and define the `multichoose`
and `choose` functions generalizing binomial coefficients.
According to our main reference [elliott2006binomial] (which lists many equivalent conditions), a
binomial ring is a torsion-free commutative ring `R` such that for any `x ∈ R` and any `k ∈ ℕ`, the
product `x(x-1)⋯(x-k+1)` is divisible by `k!`. The torsion-free condition lets us divide by `k!`
unambiguously, so we get uniquely defined binomial coefficients.
The defining condition doesn't require commutativity or associativity, and we get a theory with
essentially the same power by replacing subtraction with addition. Thus, we consider any additive
commutative monoid with a notion of natural number exponents in which multiplication by positive
integers is injective, and demand that the evaluation of the ascending Pochhammer polynomial
`X(X+1)⋯(X+(k-1))` at any element is divisible by `k!`. The quotient is called `multichoose r k`,
because for `r` a natural number, it is the number of multisets of cardinality `k` taken from a type
of cardinality `n`.
## Definitions
* `BinomialRing`: a mixin class specifying a suitable `multichoose` function.
* `Ring.multichoose`: the quotient of an ascending Pochhammer evaluation by a factorial.
* `Ring.choose`: the quotient of a descending Pochhammer evaluation by a factorial.
## Results
* Basic results with choose and multichoose, e.g., `choose_zero_right`
* Relations between choose and multichoose, negated input.
* Fundamental recursion: `choose_succ_succ`
* Chu-Vandermonde identity: `add_choose_eq`
* Pochhammer API
## References
* [J. Elliott, *Binomial rings, integer-valued polynomials, and λ-rings*][elliott2006binomial]
## TODO
Further results in Elliot's paper:
* A CommRing is binomial if and only if it admits a λ-ring structure with trivial Adams operations.
* The free commutative binomial ring on a set `X` is the ring of integer-valued polynomials in the
variables `X`. (also, noncommutative version?)
* Given a commutative binomial ring `A` and an `A`-algebra `B` that is complete with respect to an
ideal `I`, formal exponentiation induces an `A`-module structure on the multiplicative subgroup
`1 + I`.
-/
section Multichoose
open Function Polynomial
/-- A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by
suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural
number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined
quotient. -/
class BinomialRing (R : Type*) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] extends IsAddTorsionFree R where
/-- A multichoose function, giving the quotient of Pochhammer evaluations by factorials. -/
multichoose : R → ℕ → R
/-- The `n`th ascending Pochhammer polynomial evaluated at any element is divisible by `n!` -/
factorial_nsmul_multichoose (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
n.factorial • multichoose r n = (ascPochhammer ℕ n).smeval r
namespace Ring
variable {R : Type*} [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] protected alias nsmul_right_injective := nsmul_right_injective
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] protected alias nsmul_right_inj := nsmul_right_inj
/-- The multichoose function is the quotient of ascending Pochhammer evaluation by the corresponding
factorial. When applied to natural numbers, `multichoose k n` describes choosing a multiset of `n`
items from a type of size `k`, i.e., choosing with replacement. -/
def multichoose (r : R) (n : ℕ) : R := BinomialRing.multichoose r n
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_eq_multichoose (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
BinomialRing.multichoose r n = multichoose r n := rfl
theorem factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
n.factorial • multichoose r n = (ascPochhammer ℕ n).smeval r :=
BinomialRing.factorial_nsmul_multichoose r n
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_zero_right' (r : R) : multichoose r 0 = r ^ 0 := by
rw [← nsmul_right_inj (Nat.factorial_ne_zero 0),
factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer, ascPochhammer_zero, smeval_one, Nat.factorial]
theorem multichoose_zero_right [MulOneClass R] [NatPowAssoc R]
(r : R) : multichoose r 0 = 1 := by
rw [multichoose_zero_right', npow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_one_right' (r : R) : multichoose r 1 = r ^ 1 := by
rw [← nsmul_right_inj (Nat.factorial_ne_zero 1),
factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer, ascPochhammer_one, smeval_X, Nat.factorial_one,
one_smul]
theorem multichoose_one_right [MulOneClass R] [NatPowAssoc R] (r : R) : multichoose r 1 = r := by
rw [multichoose_one_right', npow_one]
variable {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] [Pow R ℕ] [NatPowAssoc R] [BinomialRing R]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : multichoose (0 : R) (k + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← nsmul_right_inj (Nat.factorial_ne_zero (k + 1)),
factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer, smul_zero, ascPochhammer_succ_left,
smeval_X_mul, zero_mul]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_succ (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
smeval (ascPochhammer ℕ (k + 1)) (r + 1) = Nat.factorial (k + 1) • multichoose (r + 1) k +
smeval (ascPochhammer ℕ (k + 1)) r := by
nth_rw 1 [ascPochhammer_succ_right, ascPochhammer_succ_left, mul_comm (ascPochhammer ℕ k)]
simp only [smeval_mul, smeval_comp, smeval_add, smeval_X]
rw [Nat.factorial, mul_smul, factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer]
simp only [smeval_one, npow_one, npow_zero, one_smul]
rw [← C_eq_natCast, smeval_C, npow_zero, add_assoc, add_mul, add_comm 1, @nsmul_one, add_mul]
rw [← @nsmul_eq_mul, @add_rotate', @succ_nsmul, add_assoc]
simp_all only [Nat.cast_id, nsmul_eq_mul, one_mul]
theorem multichoose_succ_succ (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
multichoose (r + 1) (k + 1) = multichoose r (k + 1) + multichoose (r + 1) k := by
rw [← nsmul_right_inj (Nat.factorial_ne_zero (k + 1))]
simp only [factorial_nsmul_multichoose_eq_ascPochhammer, smul_add]
rw [add_comm (smeval (ascPochhammer ℕ (k+1)) r), ascPochhammer_succ_succ r k]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_one (k : ℕ) : multichoose (1 : R) k = 1 := by
induction k with
| zero => exact multichoose_zero_right 1
| succ n ih =>
rw [show (1 : R) = 0 + 1 by exact (@zero_add R _ 1).symm, multichoose_succ_succ,
multichoose_zero_succ, zero_add, zero_add, ih]
theorem multichoose_two (k : ℕ) : multichoose (2 : R) k = k + 1 := by
induction k with
| zero =>
rw [multichoose_zero_right, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
| succ n ih =>
rw [one_add_one_eq_two.symm, multichoose_succ_succ, multichoose_one, one_add_one_eq_two, ih,
Nat.cast_succ, add_comm]
end Ring
end Multichoose
section Pochhammer
namespace Polynomial
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_smeval_cast (R : Type*) [Semiring R] {S : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring S]
[Pow S ℕ] [Module R S] [IsScalarTower R S S] [NatPowAssoc S]
(x : S) (n : ℕ) : (ascPochhammer R n).smeval x = (ascPochhammer ℕ n).smeval x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [ascPochhammer_zero, smeval_one, one_smul]
| succ n hn =>
simp only [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, smeval_add, smeval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm]
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, smeval_C_mul, hn, Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R n]
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id]
variable {R : Type*}
theorem ascPochhammer_smeval_eq_eval [Semiring R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer ℕ n).smeval r = (ascPochhammer R n).eval r := by
rw [eval_eq_smeval, ascPochhammer_smeval_cast R]
variable [NonAssocRing R] [Pow R ℕ] [NatPowAssoc R]
theorem descPochhammer_smeval_eq_ascPochhammer (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer ℤ n).smeval r = (ascPochhammer ℕ n).smeval (r - n + 1) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [descPochhammer_zero, ascPochhammer_zero, smeval_one, npow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right, descPochhammer_succ_right, smeval_mul, ih,
ascPochhammer_succ_left, X_mul, smeval_mul_X, smeval_comp, smeval_sub, ← C_eq_natCast,
smeval_add, smeval_one, smeval_C]
| simp only [smeval_X, npow_one, npow_zero, zsmul_one, Int.cast_natCast, one_smul]
theorem descPochhammer_smeval_eq_descFactorial (n k : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer ℤ k).smeval (n : R) = n.descFactorial k := by
induction k with
| zero =>
rw [descPochhammer_zero, Nat.descFactorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, smeval_one, npow_zero, one_smul]
| succ k ih =>
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.descFactorial_succ, smeval_mul, ih, mul_comm, Nat.cast_mul,
smeval_sub, smeval_X, smeval_natCast, npow_one, npow_zero, nsmul_one]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Binomial.lean | 191 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
| exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 72 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monovary
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Product of convex functions
This file proves that the product of convex functions is convex, provided they monovary.
As corollaries, we also prove that `x ↦ x ^ n` is convex
* `Even.convexOn_pow`: for even `n : ℕ`.
* `convexOn_pow`: over $[0, +∞)$ for `n : ℕ`.
* `convexOn_zpow`: over $(0, +∞)$ For `n : ℤ`.
-/
open Set
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[CommRing E] [LinearOrder E] [IsStrictOrderedRing E]
[AddCommGroup F] [LinearOrder F] [IsOrderedAddMonoid F]
[Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module E F] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 E F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 E F]
[OrderedSMul 𝕜 F] [OrderedSMul E F] {s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → E} {g : 𝕜 → F}
lemma ConvexOn.smul' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x)
(hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_⟩
dsimp
refine
(smul_le_smul (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hf₀ <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
add_nonneg (smul_nonneg ha <| hg₀ hx) <| smul_nonneg hb <| hg₀ hy).trans ?_
calc
_ = (a * a) • (f x • g x) + (b * b) • (f y • g y) + (a * b) • (f x • g y + f y • g x) := ?_
_ ≤ (a * a) • (f x • g x) + (b * b) • (f y • g y) + (a * b) • (f x • g x + f y • g y) := by
gcongr _ + (a * b) • ?_; exact hfg.smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul hx hy
_ = (a * (a + b)) • (f x • g x) + (b * (a + b)) • (f y • g y) := by
simp only [mul_add, add_smul, smul_add, mul_comm _ a]; abel
_ = _ := by simp_rw [hab, mul_one]
simp only [mul_add, add_smul, smul_add]
rw [← smul_smul_smul_comm a, ← smul_smul_smul_comm b, ← smul_smul_smul_comm a b,
← smul_smul_smul_comm b b, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm b,
add_comm _ ((b * b) • f y • g y), add_add_add_comm, add_comm ((a * b) • f y • g x)]
lemma ConcaveOn.smul' [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_⟩
dsimp
refine (smul_le_smul (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
(add_nonneg (smul_nonneg ha <| hf₀ hx) <| smul_nonneg hb <| hf₀ hy)
(hg₀ <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)).trans' ?_
calc a • f x • g x + b • f y • g y
= (a * (a + b)) • (f x • g x) + (b * (a + b)) • (f y • g y) := by simp_rw [hab, mul_one]
_ = (a * a) • (f x • g x) + (b * b) • (f y • g y) + (a * b) • (f x • g x + f y • g y) := by
simp only [mul_add, add_smul, smul_add, mul_comm _ a]; abel
_ ≤ (a * a) • (f x • g x) + (b * b) • (f y • g y) + (a * b) • (f x • g y + f y • g x) := by
gcongr _ + (a * b) • ?_; exact hfg.smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul hx hy
_ = _ := ?_
simp only [mul_add, add_smul, smul_add]
rw [← smul_smul_smul_comm a, ← smul_smul_smul_comm b, ← smul_smul_smul_comm a b,
← smul_smul_smul_comm b b, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm b a,
add_comm ((a * b) • f x • g y), add_comm ((a * b) • f x • g y), add_add_add_comm]
lemma ConvexOn.smul'' [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_smul_neg]
exact hf.neg.smul' hg.neg (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hf₀ hx) (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hg₀ hx)
hfg.neg
lemma ConcaveOn.smul'' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0)
(hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_smul_neg]
exact hf.neg.smul' hg.neg (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hf₀ hx) (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hg₀ hx)
hfg.neg
lemma ConvexOn.smul_concaveOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_convexOn_iff, ← smul_neg]
exact hf.smul' hg.neg hf₀ (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hg₀ hx) hfg.neg_right
lemma ConcaveOn.smul_convexOn [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_concaveOn_iff, ← smul_neg]
exact hf.smul' hg.neg hf₀ (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hg₀ hx) hfg.neg_right
lemma ConvexOn.smul_concaveOn' [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_concaveOn_iff, ← smul_neg]
exact hf.smul'' hg.neg hf₀ (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonpos.2 <| hg₀ hx) hfg.neg_right
lemma ConcaveOn.smul_convexOn' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := by
rw [← neg_convexOn_iff, ← smul_neg]
exact hf.smul'' hg.neg hf₀ (fun x hx ↦ neg_nonpos.2 <| hg₀ hx) hfg.neg_right
variable [OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 E E] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 E E] {f g : 𝕜 → E}
lemma ConvexOn.mul (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x)
(hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConcaveOn.mul (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConvexOn.mul' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0)
(hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul'' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConcaveOn.mul' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0)
(hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul'' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConvexOn.mul_concaveOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul_concaveOn hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConcaveOn.mul_convexOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → g x ≤ 0) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul_convexOn hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConvexOn.mul_concaveOn' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f * g) := hf.smul_concaveOn' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConcaveOn.mul_convexOn' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g)
(hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → f x ≤ 0) (hg₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f • g) := hf.smul_convexOn' hg hf₀ hg₀ hfg
lemma ConvexOn.pow (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hf₀ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) :
∀ n, ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using convexOn_const 1 hf.1
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ']
exact hf.mul (hf.pow hf₀ _) hf₀ (fun x hx ↦ pow_nonneg (hf₀ hx) _) <|
(monovaryOn_self f s).pow_right₀ hf₀ n
/-- `x^n`, `n : ℕ` is convex on `[0, +∞)` for all `n`. -/
lemma convexOn_pow : ∀ n, ConvexOn 𝕜 (Ici 0) fun x : 𝕜 ↦ x ^ n :=
(convexOn_id <| convex_Ici _).pow fun _ ↦ id
/-- `x^n`, `n : ℕ` is convex on the whole real line whenever `n` is even. -/
protected lemma Even.convexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) : ConvexOn 𝕜 univ fun x : 𝕜 ↦ x ^ n := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hn
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul]
refine ConvexOn.pow ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb hab ↦ sub_nonneg.1 ?_⟩
(fun _ _ ↦ by positivity) _
calc
(0 : 𝕜) ≤ (a * b) * (x - y) ^ 2 := by positivity
_ = _ := by obtain rfl := eq_sub_of_add_eq hab; simp only [smul_eq_mul]; ring
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
|
open Int in
/-- `x^m`, `m : ℤ` is convex on `(0, +∞)` for all `m`. -/
lemma convexOn_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, ConvexOn 𝕜 (Ioi 0) fun x : 𝕜 ↦ x ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by
simp_rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (convexOn_pow n).subset Ioi_subset_Ici_self (convex_Ioi _)
| -[n+1] => by
simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow]
refine (convexOn_iff_forall_pos.2 ⟨convex_Ioi _, ?_⟩).pow (fun x (hx : 0 < x) ↦ by positivity) _
rintro x (hx : 0 < x) y (hy : 0 < y) a b ha hb hab
field_simp
rw [div_le_div_iff₀, ← sub_nonneg]
· calc
0 ≤ a * b * (x - y) ^ 2 := by positivity
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Mul.lean | 169 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Conditions for rank to be finite
Also contains characterization for when rank equals zero or rank equals one.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {ι : Type w}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁]
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
open Basis Cardinal Function Module Set Submodule
/-- If every finite set of linearly independent vectors has cardinality at most `n`,
then the same is true for arbitrary sets of linearly independent vectors.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
∀ s : Set M, LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) → #s ≤ n := by
intro s li
apply Cardinal.card_le_of
intro t
rw [← Finset.card_map (Embedding.subtype s)]
apply H
apply linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype _ li
theorem rank_le {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
Module.rank R M ≤ n := by
rw [Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
exact linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded H _ li
section RankZero
/-- See `rank_zero_iff` for a stronger version with `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_zero_iff :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • x = 0 := by
nontriviality R
constructor
· contrapose!
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
have : LinearIndependent R (fun _ : Unit ↦ x) :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr (fun l hl ↦ Finsupp.unique_ext <| not_not.mp fun H ↦
hx _ H ((Finsupp.linearCombination_unique _ _ _).symm.trans hl))
simpa using this.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· intro h
rw [← le_zero_iff, Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
intro ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff]
rintro ⟨i : s⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := h i
apply ha
simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (linearIndependent_iff.mp hs (Finsupp.single i a) (by simpa)) i
theorem rank_pos_of_free [Module.Free R M] [Nontrivial M] :
0 < Module.rank R M :=
have := Module.nontrivial R M
(pos_of_ne_zero <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _).trans_le
(Free.chooseBasis R M).linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank
variable [Nontrivial R]
section
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
theorem rank_zero_iff_forall_zero :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, x = 0 := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_zero_iff, smul_eq_zero, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, false_or,
exists_and_right, and_iff_right (exists_ne (0 : R))]
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` for the reason that `Nontrivial R` is needed.
Also see `rank_eq_zero_iff` for the version without `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
theorem rank_zero_iff : Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M :=
rank_zero_iff_forall_zero.trans (subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).symm
theorem rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ x : M, x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simpa using rank_zero_iff_forall_zero
theorem rank_pos_iff_nontrivial : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ Nontrivial M :=
rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero.trans (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne 0).symm
theorem rank_pos [Nontrivial M] : 0 < Module.rank R M :=
rank_pos_iff_nontrivial.mpr ‹_›
end
variable (R M)
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` that assumes `Subsingleton R` instead. -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem rank_subsingleton' [Subsingleton M] : Module.rank R M = 0 :=
rank_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun _ ↦ ⟨1, one_ne_zero, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rank_punit : Module.rank R PUnit = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
@[simp]
theorem rank_bot : Module.rank R (⊥ : Submodule R M) = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
variable {R M}
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos {s : Submodule R M} (h : 0 < Module.rank R s) :
∃ b : M, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot fun eq => by rw [eq, rank_bot] at h; exact lt_irrefl _ h
end RankZero
section Finite
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat [Module.Free R M] {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M = n) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨⟨ι, b⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
have := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.mp <|
b.linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank |>.trans_eq h |>.trans_lt <| nat_lt_aleph0 n
exact Module.Finite.of_basis b
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(h : Module.rank R M = 0) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
rw [rank_zero_iff] at h
infer_instance
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_one [Module.Free R M] (h : Module.rank R M = 1) :
Module.Finite R M :=
Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat <| h.trans Nat.cast_one.symm
section
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem Basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Nonempty (Fintype ι) := by
rwa [← Cardinal.lift_lt, ← b.mk_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_lt_aleph0,
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_fintype] at h
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
noncomputable def Basis.fintypeIndexOfRankLtAleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Fintype ι :=
Classical.choice (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite set. -/
theorem Basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (b : Basis s R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : s.Finite :=
finite_def.2 (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
theorem cardinalMk_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type w} {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) : #ι ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← lift_le.{max v w}]
simpa only [← finrank_eq_rank, lift_natCast, lift_le_nat_iff] using h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")] alias cardinal_mk_le_finrank := cardinalMk_le_finrank
theorem fintype_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ finrank R M := by
simpa using h.cardinalMk_le_finrank
theorem finset_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{b : Finset M} (h : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : b → M)) :
b.card ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← Fintype.card_coe]
exact h.fintype_card_le_finrank
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite {ι : Type w}
[Module.Finite R M] {v : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι < ℵ₀ := by
apply Cardinal.lift_lt.1
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· rw [← finrank_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_natCast]
apply Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0
theorem finite [Module.Finite R M] {ι : Type*} {f : ι → M}
(h : LinearIndependent R f) : Finite ι :=
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_finite.1 <| h.lt_aleph0_of_finite
theorem setFinite [Module.Finite R M] {b : Set M}
(h : LinearIndependent R fun x : b => (x : M)) : b.Finite :=
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.mp h.lt_aleph0_of_finite
end LinearIndependent
lemma exists_set_linearIndependent_of_lt_rank {n : Cardinal} (hn : n < Module.rank R M) :
∃ s : Set M, #s = n ∧ LinearIndepOn R id s := by
obtain ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, hs'⟩ := exists_lt_of_lt_ciSup' (hn.trans_eq (Module.rank_def R M))
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := le_mk_iff_exists_subset.mp hs'.le
exact ⟨t, ht', hs.mono ht⟩
lemma exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ Module.rank R M) :
∃ s : Finset M, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndepOn R id (s : Set M) := by
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with h | h
· obtain ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, hs'⟩ := Cardinal.exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq _
(Cardinal.bddAbove_range _) _ (h.trans (Module.rank_def R M)).symm
have : Finite s := lt_aleph0_iff_finite.mp (hs' ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
cases nonempty_fintype s
refine ⟨s.toFinset, by simpa using hs', by simpa⟩
· obtain ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩ := exists_set_linearIndependent_of_lt_rank h
have : Finite s := lt_aleph0_iff_finite.mp (hs ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
cases nonempty_fintype s
exact ⟨s.toFinset, by simpa using hs, by simpa⟩
lemma exists_linearIndependent_of_le_rank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ Module.rank R M) :
∃ f : Fin n → M, LinearIndependent R f :=
have ⟨_, hs, hs'⟩ := exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank hn
⟨_, (linearIndependent_equiv (Finset.equivFinOfCardEq hs).symm).mpr hs'⟩
lemma natCast_le_rank_iff [Nontrivial R] {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ f : Fin n → M, LinearIndependent R f :=
⟨exists_linearIndependent_of_le_rank,
fun H ↦ by simpa using H.choose_spec.cardinal_lift_le_rank⟩
lemma natCast_le_rank_iff_finset [Nontrivial R] {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ s : Finset M, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) :=
⟨exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank,
fun ⟨s, h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by simpa [h₁] using h₂.cardinal_le_rank⟩
lemma exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_finrank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ finrank R M) :
∃ s : Finset M, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) := by
by_cases h : finrank R M = 0
· rw [le_zero_iff.mp (hn.trans_eq h)]
exact ⟨∅, rfl, by convert linearIndependent_empty R M using 2 <;> aesop⟩
exact exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank
((Nat.cast_le.mpr hn).trans_eq (cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 (toNat_ne_zero.mp h).2))
lemma exists_linearIndependent_of_le_finrank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ finrank R M) :
∃ f : Fin n → M, LinearIndependent R f :=
have ⟨_, hs, hs'⟩ := exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_finrank hn
⟨_, (linearIndependent_equiv (Finset.equivFinOfCardEq hs).symm).mpr hs'⟩
variable [Module.Finite R M] [StrongRankCondition R] in
theorem Module.Finite.not_linearIndependent_of_infinite {ι : Type*} [Infinite ι]
(v : ι → M) : ¬LinearIndependent R v := mt LinearIndependent.finite <| @not_finite _ _
section
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
theorem iSupIndep.subtype_ne_bot_le_rank [Nontrivial R]
{V : ι → Submodule R M} (hV : iSupIndep V) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} #{ i : ι // V i ≠ ⊥ } ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
set I := { i : ι // V i ≠ ⊥ }
have hI : ∀ i : I, ∃ v ∈ V i, v ≠ (0 : M) := by
| intro i
rw [← Submodule.ne_bot_iff]
exact i.prop
choose v hvV hv using hI
have : LinearIndependent R v := (hV.comp Subtype.coe_injective).linearIndependent _ hvV hv
exact this.cardinal_lift_le_rank
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.Independent.subtype_ne_bot_le_rank := iSupIndep.subtype_ne_bot_le_rank
variable [Module.Finite R M] [StrongRankCondition R]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Finite.lean | 270 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 1,032 | 1,038 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Span
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules, we construct the lattice structure on Lie submodules and we
use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance (priority := high) coeSort : CoeSort (LieSubmodule R L M) (Type w) where
coe N := { x : M // x ∈ N }
instance (priority := mid) coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
instance : CanLift (Submodule R M) (LieSubmodule R L M) (·)
(fun N ↦ ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ N → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N) where
prf N hN := ⟨⟨N, hN⟩, rfl⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coeSubmodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simp [hs]
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) :
(↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
-- Copying instances from `Submodule` for correct discrimination keys
instance [IsNoetherian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsNoetherian R N.toSubmodule
instance [IsArtinian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsArtinian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsArtinian R N.toSubmodule
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| NoZeroSMulDivisors R N.toSubmodule
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (toSubmodule_inj _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
end LieSubalgebra
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
section LatticeStructure
open Set
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubmodule R L M → Set M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule : (N : Submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule := toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instUniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M)
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias bot_coeSubmodule := bot_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_bot : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_bot_iff := toSubmodule_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_bot_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
instance : Top (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R M) with lie_mem := fun {x m} _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias top_coeSubmodule := top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_top_iff := toSubmodule_eq_top
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_top_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
mem_univ x
instance : Min (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N N' ↦
{ (N ⊓ N' : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun h ↦ mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toSubmodule := sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S}
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, forall_exists_index, and_imp] at h ⊢
intro N hN; apply N.lie_mem (h N hN) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : Set M) = ↑N ∩ ↑N' :=
rfl
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : Submodule R M) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias inf_coe_toSubmodule := inf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule := sInf_toSubmodule
theorem sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sInf_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule' := sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨅ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_toSubmodule]; ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iInf_coe_toSubmodule := iInf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, sInf_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext m
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp,
and_imp, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
instance : Max (LieSubmodule R L M) where
max N N' :=
{ toSubmodule := (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
lie_mem := by
rintro x m (hm : m ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M))
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hm ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hm
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ }
instance : SupSet (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sSup S :=
{ toSubmodule := sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
lie_mem := by
intro x m (hm : m ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S})
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsm⟩ := Submodule.mem_sSup_iff_exists_finset.mp hm
clear hm
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing m with
| empty =>
replace hsm : m = 0 := by simpa using hsm
simp [hsm]
| insert q t hqt ih =>
rw [Finset.iSup_insert] at hsm
obtain ⟨m', hm', u, hu, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hsm
rw [lie_add]
refine add_mem ?_ (ih (Subset.trans (by simp) hs) hu)
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ : ∃ p ∈ S, ↑p = q := hs (Finset.mem_insert_self q t)
suffices p ≤ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S} by exact this (p.lie_mem hm')
exact le_sSup ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem sup_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sup_coe_toSubmodule := sup_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sSup_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = sSup {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule := sSup_toSubmodule
theorem sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sSup_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule' := sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨆ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iSup, sSup_toSubmodule]; ext; simp [Submodule.mem_sSup, Submodule.mem_iSup]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iSup_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_toSubmodule
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
{ toSubmodule_injective.completeLattice toSubmodule sup_toSubmodule inf_toSubmodule
sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf rfl rfl with
toPartialOrder := SetLike.instPartialOrder }
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι} {b : M} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ N i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, N i :=
(le_iSup N i) h
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma iSup_induction {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : M → Prop} {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (mem : ∀ i, ∀ y ∈ N i, motive y) (zero : motive 0)
(add : ∀ y z, motive y → motive z → motive (y + z)) : motive x := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule] at hx
exact Submodule.iSup_induction (motive := motive) (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) hx mem zero add
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iSup_induction' {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : (x : M) → (x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (i) (x) (hx : x ∈ N i), motive x (mem_iSup_of_mem i hx)) (zero : motive 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) : motive x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hc : motive x hx) => hc
refine iSup_induction N (motive := fun x : M ↦ ∃ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i), motive x hx) hx
(fun i x hx => ?_) ?_ fun x y => ?_
· exact ⟨_, mem _ _ hx⟩
· exact ⟨_, zero⟩
· rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩
exact ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩
variable {N N'}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_toSubmodule :
Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Disjoint N N' := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, inf_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule,
← disjoint_iff]
@[deprecated disjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem disjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Disjoint N N' ↔ Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := disjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := disjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Codisjoint N N' := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, sup_toSubmodule,
top_toSubmodule, ← codisjoint_iff]
@[deprecated codisjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint N N' ↔ Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) :=
codisjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma isCompl_toSubmodule :
IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ IsCompl N N' := by
simp [isCompl_iff]
@[deprecated isCompl_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem isCompl_iff_toSubmodule :
| IsCompl N N' ↔ IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := isCompl_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias isCompl_iff_coe_toSubmodule := isCompl_iff_toSubmodule
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 499 | 501 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-! # Formal power series (in one variable) - Order
The `PowerSeries.order` of a formal power series `φ` is the multiplicity of the variable `X` in `φ`.
If the coefficients form an integral domain, then `PowerSeries.order` is an
additive valuation (`PowerSeries.order_mul`, `PowerSeries.min_order_le_order_add`).
We prove that if the commutative ring `R` of coefficients is an integral domain,
then the ring `R⟦X⟧` of formal power series in one variable over `R`
is an integral domain.
Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divided_by_X_pow_order f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order. This is useful when
proving that `R⟦X⟧` is a normalization monoid, which is done in `PowerSeries.Inverse`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section OrderBasic
variable [Semiring R] {φ : R⟦X⟧}
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero : (∃ n : ℕ, coeff R n φ ≠ 0) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
refine not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
simp [(coeff R _).map_zero]
/-- The order of a formal power series `φ` is the greatest `n : PartENat`
such that `X^n` divides `φ`. The order is `⊤` if and only if `φ = 0`. -/
def order (φ : R⟦X⟧) : ℕ∞ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
letI := Classical.decEq R⟦X⟧
if h : φ = 0 then ⊤ else Nat.find (exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mpr h)
/-- The order of the `0` power series is infinite. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : R⟦X⟧) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem order_finite_iff_ne_zero : (order φ < ⊤) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [order]
split_ifs with h <;> simpa
/-- The `0` power series is the unique power series with infinite order. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_eq_top {φ : R⟦X⟧} : φ.order = ⊤ ↔ φ = 0 := by
simpa using order_finite_iff_ne_zero.not_left
theorem coe_toNat_order {φ : R⟦X⟧} (hf : φ ≠ 0) : φ.order.toNat = φ.order := by
rw [ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self.mpr (order_eq_top.not.mpr hf)]
/-- If the order of a formal power series is finite,
then the coefficient indexed by the order is nonzero. -/
theorem coeff_order (h : φ ≠ 0) : coeff R φ.order.toNat φ ≠ 0 := by
classical
simp only [order, h, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
generalize_proofs h
exact Nat.find_spec h
/-- If the `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is nonzero,
then the order of the power series is less than or equal to `n`. -/
theorem order_le (n : ℕ) (h : coeff R n φ ≠ 0) : order φ ≤ n := by
classical
rw [order, dif_neg]
· simpa using ⟨n, le_rfl, h⟩
· exact exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mp ⟨n, h⟩
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is `0` if `n` is strictly
smaller than the order of the power series. -/
theorem coeff_of_lt_order (n : ℕ) (h : ↑n < order φ) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact order_le _ h
theorem coeff_of_lt_order_toNat (n : ℕ) (h : n < φ.order.toNat) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
by_cases h' : φ = 0
· simp [h']
· refine coeff_of_lt_order _ ?_
rwa [← coe_toNat_order h', ENat.coe_lt_coe]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem nat_le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ i < n, coeff R i φ = 0) : ↑n ≤ order φ := by
classical
simp only [order]
split_ifs
· simp
· simpa [Nat.le_find_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ∞) (h : ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :
| n ≤ order φ := by
cases n with
| top => simpa using ext (by simpa using h)
| coe n =>
convert nat_le_order φ n _
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Order.lean | 112 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
/-!
# Infinite sum in a ring
This file provides lemmas about the interaction between infinite sums and multiplication.
## Main results
* `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`: Cauchy product formula
-/
open Filter Finset Function
variable {ι κ α : Type*}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalSemiring α] {f : ι → α}
{a₁ : α}
theorem HasSum.mul_left (a₂) (h : HasSum f a₁) : HasSum (fun i ↦ a₂ * f i) (a₂ * a₁) := by
simpa only using h.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a₂) (continuous_const.mul continuous_id)
theorem HasSum.mul_right (a₂) (hf : HasSum f a₁) : HasSum (fun i ↦ f i * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) := by
simpa only using hf.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight a₂) (continuous_id.mul continuous_const)
theorem Summable.mul_left (a) (hf : Summable f) : Summable fun i ↦ a * f i :=
(hf.hasSum.mul_left _).summable
| theorem Summable.mul_right (a) (hf : Summable f) : Summable fun i ↦ f i * a :=
(hf.hasSum.mul_right _).summable
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Ring.lean | 38 | 39 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.BernoulliPolynomials
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
/-!
# Critical values of the Riemann zeta function
In this file we prove formulae for the critical values of `ζ(s)`, and more generally of Hurwitz
zeta functions, in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
## Main results:
* `hasSum_zeta_nat`: the final formula for zeta values,
$$\zeta(2k) = \frac{(-1)^{(k + 1)} 2 ^ {2k - 1} \pi^{2k} B_{2 k}}{(2 k)!}.$$
* `hasSum_zeta_two` and `hasSum_zeta_four`: special cases given explicitly.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), cos (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 2` even.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_sin`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), sin (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 3` odd.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat Real Interval
open Complex MeasureTheory Set intervalIntegral
local notation "𝕌" => UnitAddCircle
section BernoulliFunProps
/-! Simple properties of the Bernoulli polynomial, as a function `ℝ → ℝ`. -/
/-- The function `x ↦ Bₖ(x) : ℝ → ℝ`. -/
def bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli k)).eval x
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_zero (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 0 = bernoulli k := by
rw [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_zero_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 1) :
bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_zero, bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one,
bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one hk, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_one (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 + ite (k = 1) 1 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun, bernoulliFun_eval_zero, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, bernoulli_one, bernoulli'_one, eq_ratCast]
push_cast; ring
· rw [bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one h, add_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (bernoulliFun k) (k * bernoulliFun (k - 1) x) x := by
convert ((Polynomial.bernoulli k).map <| algebraMap ℚ ℝ).hasDerivAt x using 1
simp only [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.derivative_map, Polynomial.derivative_bernoulli k,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.eval_mul, Polynomial.eval_natCast]
theorem antideriv_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => bernoulliFun (k + 1) x / (k + 1)) (bernoulliFun k x) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k + 1) x).div_const _ using 1
field_simp [Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero k]
theorem integral_bernoulliFun_eq_zero {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, bernoulliFun k x = 0 := by
rw [integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x _ => antideriv_bernoulliFun k x)
((Polynomial.continuous _).intervalIntegrable _ _)]
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· exfalso; exact hk (Nat.succ_inj.mp h)
· simp
end BernoulliFunProps
section BernoulliFourierCoeffs
/-! Compute the Fourier coefficients of the Bernoulli functions via integration by parts. -/
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of the `k`-th Bernoulli function on the interval `[0, 1]`. -/
def bernoulliFourierCoeff (k : ℕ) (n : ℤ) : ℂ :=
fourierCoeffOn zero_lt_one (fun x => bernoulliFun k x) n
/-- Recurrence relation (in `k`) for the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `Bₖ`. -/
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence (k : ℕ) {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
bernoulliFourierCoeff k n =
1 / (-2 * π * I * n) * (ite (k = 1) 1 0 - k * bernoulliFourierCoeff (k - 1) n) := by
unfold bernoulliFourierCoeff
rw [fourierCoeffOn_of_hasDerivAt zero_lt_one hn
(fun x _ => (hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun k x).ofReal_comp)
((continuous_ofReal.comp <|
continuous_const.mul <| Polynomial.continuous _).intervalIntegrable
_ _)]
simp_rw [ofReal_one, ofReal_zero, sub_zero, one_mul]
rw [QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_eval_zero, one_mul, ← ofReal_sub, bernoulliFun_eval_one,
add_sub_cancel_left]
congr 2
· split_ifs <;> simp only [ofReal_one, ofReal_zero, one_mul]
· simp_rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_natCast, fourierCoeffOn.const_mul]
/-- The Fourier coefficients of `B₀(x) = 1`. -/
theorem bernoulli_zero_fourier_coeff {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : bernoulliFourierCoeff 0 n = 0 := by
simpa using bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence 0 hn
/-- The `0`-th Fourier coefficient of `Bₖ(x)`. -/
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_zero {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : bernoulliFourierCoeff k 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff, fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, neg_zero, fourier_zero, sub_zero,
div_one, one_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_ofReal, integral_bernoulliFun_eq_zero hk,
ofReal_zero]
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_eq {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) :
bernoulliFourierCoeff k n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_zero hk, Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_pow hk,
div_zero]
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ (fun k hk h'k => ?_) k (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hk)
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence 1 hn]
simp only [Nat.cast_one, tsub_self, neg_mul, one_mul, eq_self_iff_true, if_true,
Nat.factorial_one, pow_one, inv_I, mul_neg]
rw [bernoulli_zero_fourier_coeff hn, sub_zero, mul_one, div_neg, neg_div]
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence (k + 1) hn, Nat.add_sub_cancel k 1]
split_ifs with h
· exfalso; exact (ne_of_gt (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr hk)) h
· rw [h'k, Nat.factorial_succ, zero_sub, Nat.cast_mul, pow_add, pow_one, neg_div, mul_neg,
mul_neg, mul_neg, neg_neg, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_mul, div_neg]
field_simp [Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn, I_ne_zero]
ring_nf
end BernoulliFourierCoeffs
section BernoulliPeriodized
/-! In this section we use the above evaluations of the Fourier coefficients of Bernoulli
polynomials, together with the theorem `has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable` from Fourier
theory, to obtain an explicit formula for `∑ (n:ℤ), 1 / n ^ k * fourier n x`. -/
/-- The Bernoulli polynomial, extended from `[0, 1)` to the unit circle. -/
def periodizedBernoulli (k : ℕ) : 𝕌 → ℝ :=
AddCircle.liftIco 1 0 (bernoulliFun k)
theorem periodizedBernoulli.continuous {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 1) : Continuous (periodizedBernoulli k) :=
AddCircle.liftIco_zero_continuous
(mod_cast (bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one hk).symm)
(Polynomial.continuous _).continuousOn
theorem fourierCoeff_bernoulli_eq {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k : 𝕌 → ℂ) n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
have : ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k : 𝕌 → ℂ) = AddCircle.liftIco 1 0 ((↑) ∘ bernoulliFun k) := by
ext1 x; rfl
rw [this, fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq]
simpa only [zero_add] using bernoulliFourierCoeff_eq hk n
theorem summable_bernoulli_fourier {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) :
Summable (fun n => -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k : ℤ → ℂ) := by
have :
∀ n : ℤ, -(k ! : ℂ) / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k = -k ! / (2 * π * I) ^ k * (1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k) := by
intro n; rw [mul_one_div, div_div, ← mul_pow]
simp_rw [this]
refine Summable.mul_left _ <| .of_norm ?_
have : (fun x : ℤ => ‖1 / (x : ℂ) ^ k‖) = fun x : ℤ => |1 / (x : ℝ) ^ k| := by
ext1 x
simp only [one_div, norm_inv, norm_pow, norm_intCast, pow_abs, abs_inv]
simp_rw [this]
rwa [summable_abs_iff, Real.summable_one_div_int_pow]
theorem hasSum_one_div_pow_mul_fourier_mul_bernoulliFun {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ => 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k * fourier n (x : 𝕌))
(-(2 * π * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k x) := by
-- first show it suffices to prove result for `Ico 0 1`
suffices ∀ {y : ℝ}, y ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 →
HasSum (fun (n : ℤ) ↦ 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k * fourier n y)
(-(2 * (π : ℂ) * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k y) by
rw [← Ico_insert_right (zero_le_one' ℝ), mem_insert_iff, or_comm] at hx
rcases hx with (hx | rfl)
· exact this hx
· convert this (left_mem_Ico.mpr zero_lt_one) using 1
· rw [AddCircle.coe_period, QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero]
· rw [bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one (by omega : k ≠ 1)]
intro y hy
let B : C(𝕌, ℂ) :=
ContinuousMap.mk ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k)
(continuous_ofReal.comp (periodizedBernoulli.continuous (by omega)))
have step1 : ∀ n : ℤ, fourierCoeff B n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]; exact fourierCoeff_bernoulli_eq (by omega : k ≠ 0)
have step2 :=
has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable
((summable_bernoulli_fourier hk).congr fun n => (step1 n).symm) y
simp_rw [step1] at step2
convert step2.mul_left (-(2 * ↑π * I) ^ k / (k ! : ℂ)) using 2 with n
· rw [smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_div, mul_neg, div_mul_cancel₀, neg_neg, mul_pow _ (n : ℂ),
← div_div, div_self]
· rw [Ne, pow_eq_zero_iff', not_and_or]
exact Or.inl two_pi_I_ne_zero
· exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)
· rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, ofReal_inj, periodizedBernoulli,
AddCircle.liftIco_coe_apply (show y ∈ Ico 0 (0 + 1) by rwa [zero_add])]
end BernoulliPeriodized
section Cleanup
-- This section is just reformulating the results in a nicer form.
theorem hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_fourier {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum
(fun n : ℕ =>
(1 : ℂ) / (n : ℂ) ^ k * (fourier n (x : 𝕌) + (-1 : ℂ) ^ k * fourier (-n) (x : 𝕌)))
(-(2 * π * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k x) := by
convert (hasSum_one_div_pow_mul_fourier_mul_bernoulliFun hk hx).nat_add_neg using 1
· ext1 n
rw [Int.cast_neg, mul_add, ← mul_assoc]
conv_rhs => rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_pow, ← div_div]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div₀, one_mul]
congr 1
rw [eq_div_iff, ← mul_pow, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul, neg_neg, one_pow]
apply pow_ne_zero; rw [neg_ne_zero]; exact one_ne_zero
· rw [Int.cast_zero, zero_pow (by positivity : k ≠ 0), div_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
theorem hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 * k) * Real.cos (2 * π * n * x))
((-1 : ℝ) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * π) ^ (2 * k) / 2 / (2 * k)! *
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli (2 * k))).eval x) := by
have :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ (2 * k) * (fourier n (x : 𝕌) + fourier (-n) (x : 𝕌)))
((-1 : ℂ) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * (π : ℂ)) ^ (2 * k) / (2 * k)! * bernoulliFun (2 * k) x) := by
convert
hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_fourier (by omega : 2 ≤ 2 * k)
hx using 3
· rw [pow_mul (-1 : ℂ), neg_one_sq, one_pow, one_mul]
· rw [pow_add, pow_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [mul_pow]
congr
congr
· skip
· rw [pow_mul, I_sq]
ring
have ofReal_two : ((2 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 2 := by norm_cast
convert ((hasSum_iff _ _).mp (this.div_const 2)).1 with n
· convert (ofReal_re _).symm
| rw [ofReal_mul]; rw [← mul_div]; congr
· rw [ofReal_div, ofReal_one, ofReal_pow]; rfl
· rw [ofReal_cos, ofReal_mul, fourier_coe_apply, fourier_coe_apply, cos, ofReal_one, div_one,
div_one, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_two, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast,
ofReal_natCast]
congr 3
· ring
· ring
· convert (ofReal_re _).symm
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg,
ofReal_natCast, ofReal_mul, ofReal_two, ofReal_one]
rw [bernoulliFun]
ring
theorem hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_sin {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 * k + 1) * Real.sin (2 * π * n * x))
((-1 : ℝ) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * π) ^ (2 * k + 1) / 2 / (2 * k + 1)! *
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli (2 * k + 1))).eval x) := by
have :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ (2 * k + 1) * (fourier n (x : 𝕌) - fourier (-n) (x : 𝕌)))
((-1 : ℂ) ^ (k + 1) * I * (2 * π : ℂ) ^ (2 * k + 1) / (2 * k + 1)! *
bernoulliFun (2 * k + 1) x) := by
convert
hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_fourier
(by omega : 2 ≤ 2 * k + 1) hx using 1
· ext1 n
rw [pow_add (-1 : ℂ), pow_mul (-1 : ℂ), neg_one_sq, one_pow, one_mul, pow_one, ←
neg_eq_neg_one_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
· congr
rw [pow_add, pow_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [mul_pow]
congr
congr
· skip
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ZetaValues.lean | 251 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Hom
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines various properties of bilinear forms, including reflexivity, symmetry,
alternativity, adjoint, and non-degeneracy.
For orthogonality, see `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Orthogonal.lean`.
## Notations
Given any term `B` of type `BilinForm`, due to a coercion, can use
the notation `B x y` to refer to the function field, ie. `B x y = B.bilin x y`.
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M`, `M'`, ... are modules over the commutative semiring `R`,
- `M₁`, `M₁'`, ... are modules over the commutative ring `R₁`,
- `V`, ... is a vector space over the field `K`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilinear_form>
## Tags
Bilinear form,
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {V : Type*} {K : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
variable {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
variable {B : BilinForm R M} {B₁ : BilinForm R₁ M₁}
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
/-! ### Reflexivity, symmetry, and alternativity -/
/-- The proposition that a bilinear form is reflexive -/
def IsRefl (B : BilinForm R M) : Prop := LinearMap.IsRefl B
namespace IsRefl
theorem eq_zero (H : B.IsRefl) : ∀ {x y : M}, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0 := fun {x y} => H x y
protected theorem neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} (hB : B.IsRefl) : (-B).IsRefl := fun x y =>
neg_eq_zero.mpr ∘ hB x y ∘ neg_eq_zero.mp
protected theorem smul {α} [Semiring α] [Module α R] [SMulCommClass R α R]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors α R] (a : α) {B : BilinForm R M} (hB : B.IsRefl) :
(a • B).IsRefl := fun _ _ h =>
(smul_eq_zero.mp h).elim (fun ha => smul_eq_zero_of_left ha _) fun hBz =>
smul_eq_zero_of_right _ (hB _ _ hBz)
protected theorem groupSMul {α} [Group α] [DistribMulAction α R] [SMulCommClass R α R] (a : α)
{B : BilinForm R M} (hB : B.IsRefl) : (a • B).IsRefl := fun x y =>
(smul_eq_zero_iff_eq _).mpr ∘ hB x y ∘ (smul_eq_zero_iff_eq _).mp
end IsRefl
@[simp]
theorem isRefl_zero : (0 : BilinForm R M).IsRefl := fun _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem isRefl_neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} : (-B).IsRefl ↔ B.IsRefl :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg B ▸ h.neg, IsRefl.neg⟩
/-- The proposition that a bilinear form is symmetric -/
def IsSymm (B : BilinForm R M) : Prop := LinearMap.IsSymm B
namespace IsSymm
protected theorem eq (H : B.IsSymm) (x y : M) : B x y = B y x :=
H x y
theorem isRefl (H : B.IsSymm) : B.IsRefl := fun x y H1 => H x y ▸ H1
protected theorem add {B₁ B₂ : BilinForm R M} (hB₁ : B₁.IsSymm) (hB₂ : B₂.IsSymm) :
(B₁ + B₂).IsSymm := fun x y => (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (hB₁ x y) (hB₂ x y) :)
protected theorem sub {B₁ B₂ : BilinForm R₁ M₁} (hB₁ : B₁.IsSymm) (hB₂ : B₂.IsSymm) :
(B₁ - B₂).IsSymm := fun x y => (congr_arg₂ Sub.sub (hB₁ x y) (hB₂ x y) :)
protected theorem neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} (hB : B.IsSymm) : (-B).IsSymm := fun x y =>
congr_arg Neg.neg (hB x y)
protected theorem smul {α} [Monoid α] [DistribMulAction α R] [SMulCommClass R α R] (a : α)
{B : BilinForm R M} (hB : B.IsSymm) : (a • B).IsSymm := fun x y =>
congr_arg (a • ·) (hB x y)
/-- The restriction of a symmetric bilinear form on a submodule is also symmetric. -/
theorem restrict {B : BilinForm R M} (b : B.IsSymm) (W : Submodule R M) :
(B.restrict W).IsSymm := fun x y => b x y
end IsSymm
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_zero : (0 : BilinForm R M).IsSymm := fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} : (-B).IsSymm ↔ B.IsSymm :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg B ▸ h.neg, IsSymm.neg⟩
theorem isSymm_iff_flip : B.IsSymm ↔ flipHom B = B :=
(forall₂_congr fun _ _ => by exact eq_comm).trans BilinForm.ext_iff.symm
/-- The proposition that a bilinear form is alternating -/
def IsAlt (B : BilinForm R M) : Prop := LinearMap.IsAlt B
namespace IsAlt
theorem self_eq_zero (H : B.IsAlt) (x : M) : B x x = 0 := LinearMap.IsAlt.self_eq_zero H x
theorem neg_eq (H : B₁.IsAlt) (x y : M₁) : -B₁ x y = B₁ y x := LinearMap.IsAlt.neg H x y
theorem isRefl (H : B₁.IsAlt) : B₁.IsRefl := LinearMap.IsAlt.isRefl H
theorem eq_of_add_add_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd R] {a b c : M} (H : B.IsAlt) (hAdd : a + b + c = 0) :
B a b = B b c := LinearMap.IsAlt.eq_of_add_add_eq_zero H hAdd
protected theorem add {B₁ B₂ : BilinForm R M} (hB₁ : B₁.IsAlt) (hB₂ : B₂.IsAlt) : (B₁ + B₂).IsAlt :=
fun x => (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (hB₁ x) (hB₂ x) :).trans <| add_zero _
protected theorem sub {B₁ B₂ : BilinForm R₁ M₁} (hB₁ : B₁.IsAlt) (hB₂ : B₂.IsAlt) :
(B₁ - B₂).IsAlt := fun x => (congr_arg₂ Sub.sub (hB₁ x) (hB₂ x)).trans <| sub_zero _
protected theorem neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} (hB : B.IsAlt) : (-B).IsAlt := fun x =>
neg_eq_zero.mpr <| hB x
protected theorem smul {α} [Monoid α] [DistribMulAction α R] [SMulCommClass R α R] (a : α)
{B : BilinForm R M} (hB : B.IsAlt) : (a • B).IsAlt := fun x =>
(congr_arg (a • ·) (hB x)).trans <| smul_zero _
end IsAlt
@[simp]
theorem isAlt_zero : (0 : BilinForm R M).IsAlt := fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAlt_neg {B : BilinForm R₁ M₁} : (-B).IsAlt ↔ B.IsAlt :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg B ▸ h.neg, IsAlt.neg⟩
end BilinForm
namespace BilinForm
/-- A nondegenerate bilinear form is a bilinear form such that the only element that is orthogonal
to every other element is `0`; i.e., for all nonzero `m` in `M`, there exists `n` in `M` with
`B m n ≠ 0`.
Note that for general (neither symmetric nor antisymmetric) bilinear forms this definition has a
chirality; in addition to this "left" nondegeneracy condition one could define a "right"
nondegeneracy condition that in the situation described, `B n m ≠ 0`. This variant definition is
not currently provided in mathlib. In finite dimension either definition implies the other. -/
def Nondegenerate (B : BilinForm R M) : Prop :=
∀ m : M, (∀ n : M, B m n = 0) → m = 0
section
variable (R M)
/-- In a non-trivial module, zero is not non-degenerate. -/
theorem not_nondegenerate_zero [Nontrivial M] : ¬(0 : BilinForm R M).Nondegenerate :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
fun h => hm (h m fun _ => rfl)
end
variable {M' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
theorem Nondegenerate.ne_zero [Nontrivial M] {B : BilinForm R M} (h : B.Nondegenerate) : B ≠ 0 :=
fun h0 => not_nondegenerate_zero R M <| h0 ▸ h
theorem Nondegenerate.congr {B : BilinForm R M} (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (h : B.Nondegenerate) :
(congr e B).Nondegenerate := fun m hm =>
e.symm.map_eq_zero_iff.1 <|
h (e.symm m) fun n => (congr_arg _ (e.symm_apply_apply n).symm).trans (hm (e n))
@[simp]
theorem nondegenerate_congr_iff {B : BilinForm R M} (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
(congr e B).Nondegenerate ↔ B.Nondegenerate :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.congr e.symm
rw [congr_congr, e.self_trans_symm, congr_refl, LinearEquiv.refl_apply], Nondegenerate.congr e⟩
/-- A bilinear form is nondegenerate if and only if it has a trivial kernel. -/
theorem nondegenerate_iff_ker_eq_bot {B : BilinForm R M} :
B.Nondegenerate ↔ LinearMap.ker B = ⊥ := by
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
simp [Nondegenerate, LinearMap.ext_iff]
theorem Nondegenerate.ker_eq_bot {B : BilinForm R M} (h : B.Nondegenerate) :
LinearMap.ker B = ⊥ := nondegenerate_iff_ker_eq_bot.mp h
theorem compLeft_injective (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (b : B.Nondegenerate) :
Function.Injective B.compLeft := fun φ ψ h => by
ext w
refine eq_of_sub_eq_zero (b _ ?_)
intro v
rw [sub_left, ← compLeft_apply, ← compLeft_apply, ← h, sub_self]
theorem isAdjointPair_unique_of_nondegenerate (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (b : B.Nondegenerate)
(φ ψ₁ ψ₂ : M₁ →ₗ[R₁] M₁) (hψ₁ : IsAdjointPair B B ψ₁ φ) (hψ₂ : IsAdjointPair B B ψ₂ φ) :
ψ₁ = ψ₂ :=
B.compLeft_injective b <| ext fun v w => by rw [compLeft_apply, compLeft_apply, hψ₁, hψ₂]
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional K V]
/-- Given a nondegenerate bilinear form `B` on a finite-dimensional vector space, `B.toDual` is
the linear equivalence between a vector space and its dual. -/
noncomputable def toDual (B : BilinForm K V) (b : B.Nondegenerate) : V ≃ₗ[K] Module.Dual K V :=
B.linearEquivOfInjective (LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp <| b.ker_eq_bot)
Subspace.dual_finrank_eq.symm
theorem toDual_def {B : BilinForm K V} (b : B.SeparatingLeft) {m n : V} : B.toDual b m n = B m n :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma apply_toDual_symm_apply {B : BilinForm K V} {hB : B.Nondegenerate}
(f : Module.Dual K V) (v : V) :
B ((B.toDual hB).symm f) v = f v := by
change B.toDual hB ((B.toDual hB).symm f) v = f v
simp only [LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
lemma Nondegenerate.flip {B : BilinForm K V} (hB : B.Nondegenerate) :
B.flip.Nondegenerate := by
intro x hx
apply (Module.evalEquiv K V).injective
ext f
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (B.toDual hB).surjective f
simpa using hx y
lemma nonDegenerateFlip_iff {B : BilinForm K V} :
B.flip.Nondegenerate ↔ B.Nondegenerate := ⟨Nondegenerate.flip, Nondegenerate.flip⟩
end FiniteDimensional
| section DualBasis
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [Finite ι]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Properties.lean | 255 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogBounds
/-!
# Complex arctangent
This file defines the complex arctangent `Complex.arctan` as
$$\arctan z = -\frac i2 \log \frac{1 + zi}{1 - zi}$$
and shows that it extends `Real.arctan` to the complex plane. Its Taylor series expansion
$$\arctan z = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n + 1} z^{2n + 1},\ |z|<1$$
is proved in `Complex.hasSum_arctan`.
-/
namespace Complex
open scoped Real
/-- The complex arctangent, defined via the complex logarithm. -/
noncomputable def arctan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := -I / 2 * log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I))
theorem tan_arctan {z : ℂ} (h₁ : z ≠ I) (h₂ : z ≠ -I) : tan (arctan z) = z := by
unfold tan sin cos
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
-- multiply top and bottom by `exp (arctan z * I)`
← mul_div_mul_right _ _ (exp_ne_zero (arctan z * I)), sub_mul, add_mul,
← exp_add, neg_mul, neg_add_cancel, exp_zero, ← exp_add, ← two_mul]
have z₁ : 1 + z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₁
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg] at h₁
exact h₁.symm
have z₂ : 1 - z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₂
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, one_mul] at h₂
exact h₂.symm
have key : exp (2 * (arctan z * I)) = (1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I) := by
rw [arctan, ← mul_rotate, ← mul_assoc,
show 2 * (I * (-I / 2)) = 1 by field_simp, one_mul, exp_log]
· exact div_ne_zero z₁ z₂
-- multiply top and bottom by `1 - z * I`
rw [key, ← mul_div_mul_right _ _ z₂, sub_mul, add_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ z₂, one_mul,
show _ / _ * I = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
/-- `cos z` is nonzero when the bounds in `arctan_tan` are met (`z` lies in the vertical strip
`-π / 2 < z.re < π / 2` and `z ≠ π / 2`). -/
lemma cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re)
(h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) : cos z ≠ 0 := by
refine cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun k ↦ ?_)
rw [ne_eq, Complex.ext_iff, not_and_or] at h₀ ⊢
norm_cast at h₀ ⊢
rcases h₀ with nr | ni
· left; contrapose! nr
rw [nr, mul_div_assoc, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₁
rw [nr, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₂
norm_cast at h₁ h₂
change -1 < _ at h₁
rwa [show 2 * k + 1 = 1 by omega, Int.cast_one, one_mul] at nr
· exact Or.inr ni
| theorem arctan_tan {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re) (h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) :
arctan (tan z) = z := by
have h := cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds h₀ h₁ h₂
unfold arctan tan
-- multiply top and bottom by `cos z`
rw [← mul_div_mul_right (1 + _) _ h, add_mul, sub_mul, one_mul, ← mul_rotate, mul_div_cancel₀ _ h]
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, 1, 2]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← sin_neg, ← cos_neg]
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I, ← exp_sub, show z * I - -z * I = 2 * (I * z) by ring, log_exp,
show -I / 2 * (2 * (I * z)) = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
all_goals norm_num
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' two_pos, neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' two_pos]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arctan.lean | 64 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Contracting maps
A Lipschitz continuous self-map with Lipschitz constant `K < 1` is called a *contracting map*.
In this file we prove the Banach fixed point theorem, some explicit estimates on the rate
of convergence, and some properties of the map sending a contracting map to its fixed point.
## Main definitions
* `ContractingWith K f` : a Lipschitz continuous self-map with `K < 1`;
* `efixedPoint` : given a contracting map `f` on a complete emetric space and a point `x`
such that `edist x (f x) ≠ ∞`, `efixedPoint f hf x hx` is the unique fixed point of `f`
in `EMetric.ball x ∞`;
* `fixedPoint` : the unique fixed point of a contracting map on a complete nonempty metric space.
## Tags
contracting map, fixed point, Banach fixed point theorem
-/
open NNReal Topology ENNReal Filter Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A map is said to be `ContractingWith K`, if `K < 1` and `f` is `LipschitzWith K`. -/
def ContractingWith [EMetricSpace α] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → α) :=
K < 1 ∧ LipschitzWith K f
namespace ContractingWith
variable [EMetricSpace α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → α}
open EMetric Set
theorem toLipschitzWith (hf : ContractingWith K f) : LipschitzWith K f := hf.2
theorem one_sub_K_pos' (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 - K := by simp [hf.1]
theorem one_sub_K_ne_zero (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt hf.one_sub_K_pos'
theorem one_sub_K_ne_top : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ ∞ := by
norm_cast
exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
theorem edist_inequality (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (h : edist x y ≠ ∞) :
edist x y ≤ (edist x (f x) + edist y (f y)) / (1 - K) :=
suffices edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + K * edist x y by
rwa [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hf.one_sub_K_ne_zero) (Or.inl one_sub_K_ne_top),
mul_comm, ENNReal.sub_mul fun _ _ ↦ h, one_mul, tsub_le_iff_right]
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) + edist (f x) (f y) + edist (f y) y := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ = edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + edist (f x) (f y) := by rw [edist_comm y, add_right_comm]
_ ≤ edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + K * edist x y := add_le_add le_rfl (hf.2 _ _)
theorem edist_le_of_fixedPoint (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (h : edist x y ≠ ∞)
(hy : IsFixedPt f y) : edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) / (1 - K) := by
simpa only [hy.eq, edist_self, add_zero] using hf.edist_inequality h
theorem eq_or_edist_eq_top_of_fixedPoints (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (hx : IsFixedPt f x)
(hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y ∨ edist x y = ∞ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun h ↦ edist_le_zero.1 ?_
simpa only [hx.eq, edist_self, add_zero, ENNReal.zero_div] using hf.edist_le_of_fixedPoint h hy
/-- If a map `f` is `ContractingWith K`, and `s` is a forward-invariant set, then
restriction of `f` to `s` is `ContractingWith K` as well. -/
theorem restrict (hf : ContractingWith K f) {s : Set α} (hs : MapsTo f s s) :
ContractingWith K (hs.restrict f s s) :=
| ⟨hf.1, fun x y ↦ hf.2 x y⟩
section
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Contracting.lean | 79 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
/-!
# The power operator on `ℤˣ` by `ZMod 2`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ`
See also the related `negOnePow`.
## TODO
* Generalize this to `Pow G (Zmod n)` where `orderOf g = n`.
## Implementation notes
In future, we could consider a `LawfulPower M R` typeclass; but we can save ourselves a lot of work
by using `Module R (Additive M)` in its place, especially since this already has instances for
`R = ℕ` and `R = ℤ`.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
instance : SMul (ZMod 2) (Additive ℤˣ) where
smul z au := .ofMul <| au.toMul ^ z.val
lemma ZMod.smul_units_def (z : ZMod 2) (au : Additive ℤˣ) :
z • au = z.val • au := rfl
lemma ZMod.natCast_smul_units (n : ℕ) (au : Additive ℤˣ) : (n : ZMod 2) • au = n • au :=
(Int.units_pow_eq_pow_mod_two au n).symm
/-- This is an indirect way of saying that `ℤˣ` has a power operation by `ZMod 2`. -/
instance : Module (ZMod 2) (Additive ℤˣ) where
smul z au := .ofMul <| au.toMul ^ z.val
one_smul _ := Additive.toMul.injective <| pow_one _
mul_smul z₁ z₂ au := Additive.toMul.injective <| by
dsimp only [ZMod.smul_units_def, toMul_nsmul]
rw [← pow_mul, ZMod.val_mul, ← Int.units_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, mul_comm]
smul_zero _ := Additive.toMul.injective <| one_pow _
smul_add _ _ _ := Additive.toMul.injective <| mul_pow _ _ _
add_smul z₁ z₂ au := Additive.toMul.injective <| by
dsimp only [ZMod.smul_units_def, toMul_nsmul, toMul_add]
rw [← pow_add, ZMod.val_add, ← Int.units_pow_eq_pow_mod_two]
zero_smul au := Additive.toMul.injective <| pow_zero au.toMul
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Module R (Additive ℤˣ)]
/-- There is a canonical power operation on `ℤˣ` by `R` if `Additive ℤˣ` is an `R`-module.
In lemma names, this operations is called `uzpow` to match `zpow`.
Notably this is satisfied by `R ∈ {ℕ, ℤ, ZMod 2}`. -/
instance Int.instUnitsPow : Pow ℤˣ R where
pow u r := (r • Additive.ofMul u).toMul
-- The above instances form no typeclass diamonds with the standard power operators
-- but we will need `reducible_and_instances` which currently fails https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : Int.instUnitsPow = Monoid.toNatPow := rfl
example : Int.instUnitsPow = DivInvMonoid.toZPow := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofMul_uzpow (u : ℤˣ) (r : R) : Additive.ofMul (u ^ r) = r • Additive.ofMul u := rfl
@[simp] lemma toMul_uzpow (u : Additive ℤˣ) (r : R) :
(r • u).toMul = u.toMul ^ r := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma uzpow_natCast (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ) : u ^ (n : R) = u ^ n := by
change ((n : R) • Additive.ofMul u).toMul = _
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul, toMul_nsmul, toMul_ofMul]
lemma uzpow_coe_nat (s : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
s ^ (ofNat(n) : R) = s ^ (ofNat(n) : ℕ) :=
uzpow_natCast _ _
@[simp] lemma one_uzpow (x : R) : (1 : ℤˣ) ^ x = 1 :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| smul_zero _
lemma mul_uzpow (s₁ s₂ : ℤˣ) (x : R) : (s₁ * s₂) ^ x = s₁ ^ x * s₂ ^ x :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| smul_add x (Additive.ofMul s₁) (Additive.ofMul s₂)
@[simp] lemma uzpow_zero (s : ℤˣ) : (s ^ (0 : R) : ℤˣ) = (1 : ℤˣ) :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| zero_smul R (Additive.ofMul s)
@[simp] lemma uzpow_one (s : ℤˣ) : (s ^ (1 : R) : ℤˣ) = s :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| one_smul R (Additive.ofMul s)
lemma uzpow_mul (s : ℤˣ) (x y : R) : s ^ (x * y) = (s ^ x) ^ y :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| mul_comm x y ▸ mul_smul y x (Additive.ofMul s)
lemma uzpow_add (s : ℤˣ) (x y : R) : s ^ (x + y) = s ^ x * s ^ y :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| add_smul x y (Additive.ofMul s)
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Module R (Additive ℤˣ)]
lemma uzpow_sub (s : ℤˣ) (x y : R) : s ^ (x - y) = s ^ x / s ^ y :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| sub_smul x y (Additive.ofMul s)
lemma uzpow_neg (s : ℤˣ) (x : R) : s ^ (-x) = (s ^ x)⁻¹ :=
Additive.ofMul.injective <| neg_smul x (Additive.ofMul s)
|
@[norm_cast] lemma uzpow_intCast (u : ℤˣ) (z : ℤ) : u ^ (z : R) = u ^ z := by
change ((z : R) • Additive.ofMul u).toMul = _
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/IntUnitsPower.lean | 108 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, map_smul, hb']⟩
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun _ hb =>
span_induction (hx := hb) h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x _ hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
theorem isFractional_of_fg [IsLocalization S P] {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) :
IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
variable (S) in
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit (R := R) I h
variable (S P P')
variable [IsLocalization S P] [IsLocalization S P']
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun _ => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ FractionalIdeal.map_zero h⟩
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
variable [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
open Classical in
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, FractionalIdeal.map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one]
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x _ hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
rfl
variable {R₁}
@[simp]
theorem spanFinset_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f = 0 ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
simp only [← coeToSubmodule_inj, spanFinset_coe, coe_zero, Submodule.span_eq_bot,
Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
theorem spanFinset_ne_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, f j ≠ 0 := by simp
open Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [IsLocalization S P]
theorem isFractional_span_singleton (x : P) : IsFractional S (span R {x} : Submodule R P) :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_integer_multiple S x
isFractional_span_iff.mpr ⟨a, a.2, fun _ hx' => (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hx').symm ▸ ha⟩
variable (S)
/-- `spanSingleton x` is the fractional ideal generated by `x` if `0 ∉ S` -/
irreducible_def spanSingleton (x : P) : FractionalIdeal S P :=
⟨span R {x}, isFractional_span_singleton x⟩
-- local attribute [semireducible] span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem coe_spanSingleton (x : P) : (spanSingleton S x : Submodule R P) = span R {x} := by
rw [spanSingleton]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_spanSingleton {x y : P} : x ∈ spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : R, z • y = x := by
rw [spanSingleton]
exact Submodule.mem_span_singleton
theorem mem_spanSingleton_self (x : P) : x ∈ spanSingleton S x :=
(mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
variable (P) in
/-- A version of `FractionalIdeal.den_mul_self_eq_num` in terms of fractional ideals. -/
theorem den_mul_self_eq_num' (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P I.den) * I = I.num := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
dsimp only
rw [coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, coe_spanSingleton, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.span_singleton_mul]
convert I.den_mul_self_eq_num using 1
ext
rw [mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists, mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists]
simp [smul_eq_mul, Algebra.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def]
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_le_iff_mem {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton S x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_spanSingleton, Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_coe]
theorem spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton [NoZeroSMulDivisors R P] {x y : P} :
spanSingleton S x = spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : Rˣ, z • x = y := by
rw [← Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, spanSingleton, spanSingleton]
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk
theorem eq_spanSingleton_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal S P) [IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P)] :
I = spanSingleton S (generator (I : Submodule R P)) := by
-- Porting note: this used to be `coeToSubmodule_injective (span_singleton_generator ↑I).symm`
-- but Lean 4 struggled to unify everything. Turned it into an explicit `rw`.
rw [spanSingleton, ← coeToSubmodule_inj, coe_mk, span_singleton_generator]
theorem isPrincipal_iff (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P) ↔ ∃ x, I = spanSingleton S x :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨generator (I : Submodule R P), eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => { principal := ⟨x, Eq.trans (congr_arg _ hx) (coe_spanSingleton _ x)⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_zero : spanSingleton S (0 : P) = 0 := by
ext
simp [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
theorem spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y = 0 ↔ y = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
span_eq_bot.mp (by simpa using congr_arg Subtype.val h : span R {y} = ⊥) y (mem_singleton y),
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y ≠ 0 ↔ y ≠ 0 :=
not_congr spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_one : spanSingleton S (1 : P) = 1 := by
ext
refine (mem_spanSingleton S).trans ((exists_congr ?_).trans (mem_one_iff S).symm)
intro x'
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton (x y : P) :
spanSingleton S x * spanSingleton S y = spanSingleton S (x * y) := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, coe_spanSingleton, span_mul_span, singleton_mul_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_pow (x : P) (n : ℕ) : spanSingleton S x ^ n = spanSingleton S (x ^ n) := by
induction' n with n hn
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, spanSingleton_one]
· rw [pow_succ, hn, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_span_singleton (x : R) :
(↑(Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) : FractionalIdeal S P) = spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P x) := by
ext y
refine (mem_coeIdeal S).trans (Iff.trans ?_ (mem_spanSingleton S).symm)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hy'
use x'
rw [smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
· rintro ⟨y', rfl⟩
refine ⟨y' * x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨y', rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_spanSingleton {P'} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [IsLocalization S P']
(x : P) :
canonicalEquiv S P P' (spanSingleton S x) =
spanSingleton S
(IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R)
(fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy) x) := by
apply SetLike.ext_iff.mpr
intro y
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_spanSingleton]
obtain ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ := (mem_canonicalEquiv_apply _ _ _).mp h
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp hx'
use z
rw [IsLocalization.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
· rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply]
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp h
use z • x
use (mem_spanSingleton _).mpr ⟨z, rfl⟩
simp [IsLocalization.map_smul]
theorem mem_singleton_mul {x y : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
y ∈ spanSingleton S x * I ↔ ∃ y' ∈ I, y = x * y' := by
constructor
· intro h
refine FractionalIdeal.mul_induction_on h ?_ ?_
· intro x' hx' y' hy'
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton S).mp hx'
use a • y', Submodule.smul_mem (I : Submodule R P) a hy'
rw [← ha, Algebra.mul_smul_comm, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
· rintro _ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact ⟨y + y', Submodule.add_mem (I : Submodule R P) hy hy', (mul_add _ _ _).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact mul_mem_mul ((mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩) hy'
variable (K) in
theorem mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {x y : R₁} (hy : y ∈ R₁⁰) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K x ⟨y, hy⟩) * I = (J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ↔
Ideal.span {x} * I = Ideal.span {y} * J := by
have :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' _ (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) *
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K y) =
1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_comm, ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one,
IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one]
let y' : (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)ˣ := Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ this
have coe_y' : ↑y' = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) := rfl
refine Iff.trans ?_ (y'.mul_right_inj.trans coeIdeal_inj)
rw [coe_y', coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, ←
mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, ← mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton,
mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ←
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
|
theorem spanSingleton_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {z : K} :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ z * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) = J ↔
Ideal.span {((IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).1 : R₁)} * I =
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 708 | 711 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LocallySurjective
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Localization
/-!
# Locally bijective morphisms of presheaves
Let `C` a be category equipped with a Grothendieck topology `J`.
Let `A` be a concrete category.
In this file, we introduce a type-class `J.WEqualsLocallyBijective A` which says
that the class `J.W` (of morphisms of presheaves which become isomorphisms
after sheafification) is the class of morphisms that are both locally injective
and locally surjective (i.e. locally bijective). We prove that this holds iff
for any presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, the sheafification map `toSheafify J P` is locally bijective.
We show that this holds under certain universe assumptions.
-/
universe w' w v' v u' u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {J : GrothendieckTopology C}
variable {A : Type u'} [Category.{v'} A] {FA : A → A → Type*} {CA : A → Type w'}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FA X Y) (CA X) (CA Y)] [ConcreteCategory.{w'} A FA]
namespace Sheaf
section
variable {F G : Sheaf J (Type w)} (f : F ⟶ G)
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
/-- A morphism of sheaves of types is locally bijective iff it is an isomorphism.
(This is generalized below as `isLocallyBijective_iff_isIso`.) -/
private lemma isLocallyBijective_iff_isIso' :
IsLocallyInjective f ∧ IsLocallySurjective f ↔ IsIso f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, _⟩
rw [isLocallyInjective_iff_injective] at h₁
suffices ∀ (X : Cᵒᵖ), Function.Surjective (f.val.app X) by
rw [← isIso_iff_of_reflects_iso _ (sheafToPresheaf _ _), NatTrans.isIso_iff_isIso_app]
intro X
rw [isIso_iff_bijective]
exact ⟨h₁ X, this X⟩
intro X s
have H := (isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type J F.val).1 F.cond _ (Presheaf.imageSieve_mem J f.val s)
let t : Presieve.FamilyOfElements F.val (Presheaf.imageSieve f.val s).arrows :=
fun Y g hg => Presheaf.localPreimage f.val s g hg
have ht : t.Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ w
apply h₁
have eq₁ := FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ f.val g₁.op (t f₁ hf₁)
have eq₂ := FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ f.val g₂.op (t f₂ hf₂)
have eq₃ := congr_arg (G.val.map g₁.op) (Presheaf.app_localPreimage f.val s _ hf₁)
have eq₄ := congr_arg (G.val.map g₂.op) (Presheaf.app_localPreimage f.val s _ hf₂)
refine eq₁.trans (eq₃.trans (Eq.trans ?_ (eq₄.symm.trans eq₂.symm)))
erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
simp only [← op_comp, w]
refine ⟨H.amalgamate t ht, ?_⟩
· apply (Presieve.isSeparated_of_isSheaf _ _
((isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type J G.val).1 G.cond) _
(Presheaf.imageSieve_mem J f.val s)).ext
intro Y g hg
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality, H.valid_glue ht]
exact Presheaf.app_localPreimage f.val s g hg
· intro
constructor <;> infer_instance
end
section
variable {F G : Sheaf J A} (f : F ⟶ G) [(forget A).ReflectsIsomorphisms]
[J.HasSheafCompose (forget A)]
lemma isLocallyBijective_iff_isIso :
IsLocallyInjective f ∧ IsLocallySurjective f ↔ IsIso f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _⟩
rw [← isIso_iff_of_reflects_iso f (sheafCompose J (forget A)),
← isLocallyBijective_iff_isIso']
constructor <;> infer_instance
· intro
constructor <;> infer_instance
end
end Sheaf
variable (J A)
namespace GrothendieckTopology
/-- Given a category `C` equipped with a Grothendieck topology `J` and a concrete category `A`,
this property holds if a morphism in `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` satisfies `J.W` (i.e. becomes an iso after
sheafification) iff it is both locally injective and locally surjective. -/
class WEqualsLocallyBijective : Prop where
iff {X Y : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
J.W f ↔ Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J f ∧ Presheaf.IsLocallySurjective J f
section
| variable {A}
variable [J.WEqualsLocallyBijective A] {X Y : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : X ⟶ Y)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/LocallyBijective.lean | 108 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
/-!
# `lrat_proof` command
Defines a macro for producing SAT proofs from CNF / LRAT files.
These files are commonly used in the SAT community for writing proofs.
Most SAT solvers support export to [DRAT](https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06229) format,
but this format can be expensive to reconstruct because it requires recomputing all
unit propagation steps. The [LRAT](https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02353) format solves this
issue by attaching a proof to the deduction of each new clause.
(The L in LRAT stands for Linear time verification.)
There are several verified checkers for the LRAT format, and the program implemented here
makes it possible to use the lean kernel as an LRAT checker as well and expose the results
as a standard propositional theorem.
The input to the `lrat_proof` command is the name of the theorem to define,
and the statement (written in CNF format) and the proof (in LRAT format).
For example:
```
lrat_proof foo
"p cnf 2 4 1 2 0 -1 2 0 1 -2 0 -1 -2 0"
"5 -2 0 4 3 0 5 d 3 4 0 6 1 0 5 1 0 6 d 1 0 7 0 5 2 6 0"
```
produces a theorem:
```
foo : ∀ (a a_1 : Prop), (¬a ∧ ¬a_1 ∨ a ∧ ¬a_1) ∨ ¬a ∧ a_1 ∨ a ∧ a_1
```
* You can see the theorem statement by hovering over the word `foo`.
* You can use the `example` keyword in place of `foo` to avoid generating a theorem.
* You can use the `include_str` macro in place of the two strings
to load CNF / LRAT files from disk.
-/
open Lean hiding Literal
open Std (HashMap)
namespace Sat
/-- A literal is a positive or negative occurrence of an atomic propositional variable.
Note that unlike DIMACS, 0 is a valid variable index. -/
inductive Literal
| pos : Nat → Literal
| neg : Nat → Literal
/-- Construct a literal. Positive numbers are translated to positive literals,
and negative numbers become negative literals. The input is assumed to be nonzero. -/
def Literal.ofInt (i : Int) : Literal :=
if i < 0 then Literal.neg (-i-1).toNat else Literal.pos (i-1).toNat
/-- Swap the polarity of a literal. -/
def Literal.negate : Literal → Literal
| pos i => neg i
| neg i => pos i
instance : ToExpr Literal where
toTypeExpr := mkConst ``Literal
toExpr
| Literal.pos i => mkApp (mkConst ``Literal.pos) (mkRawNatLit i)
| Literal.neg i => mkApp (mkConst ``Literal.neg) (mkRawNatLit i)
/-- A clause is a list of literals, thought of as a disjunction like `a ∨ b ∨ ¬c`. -/
def Clause := List Literal
/-- The empty clause -/
def Clause.nil : Clause := []
/-- Append a literal to a clause. -/
def Clause.cons : Literal → Clause → Clause := List.cons
/-- A formula is a list of clauses, thought of as a conjunction like `(a ∨ b) ∧ c ∧ (¬c ∨ ¬d)`. -/
abbrev Fmla := List Clause
/-- A single clause as a formula. -/
def Fmla.one (c : Clause) : Fmla := [c]
/-- A conjunction of formulas. -/
def Fmla.and (a b : Fmla) : Fmla := a ++ b
/-- Formula `f` subsumes `f'` if all the clauses in `f'` are in `f`.
We use this to prove that all clauses in the formula are subsumed by it. -/
structure Fmla.subsumes (f f' : Fmla) : Prop where
prop : ∀ x, x ∈ f' → x ∈ f
theorem Fmla.subsumes_self (f : Fmla) : f.subsumes f := ⟨fun _ h ↦ h⟩
theorem Fmla.subsumes_left (f f₁ f₂ : Fmla) (H : f.subsumes (f₁.and f₂)) : f.subsumes f₁ :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ H.1 _ <| List.mem_append.2 <| Or.inl h⟩
theorem Fmla.subsumes_right (f f₁ f₂ : Fmla) (H : f.subsumes (f₁.and f₂)) : f.subsumes f₂ :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ H.1 _ <| List.mem_append.2 <| Or.inr h⟩
/-- A valuation is an assignment of values to all the propositional variables. -/
def Valuation := Nat → Prop
/-- `v.neg lit` asserts that literal `lit` is falsified in the valuation. -/
def Valuation.neg (v : Valuation) : Literal → Prop
| Literal.pos i => ¬ v i
| Literal.neg i => v i
/-- `v.satisfies c` asserts that clause `c` satisfied by the valuation.
It is written in a negative way: A clause like `a ∨ ¬b ∨ c` is rewritten as
`¬a → b → ¬c → False`, so we are asserting that it is not the case that
all literals in the clause are falsified. -/
def Valuation.satisfies (v : Valuation) : Clause → Prop
| [] => False
| l::c => v.neg l → v.satisfies c
/-- `v.satisfies_fmla f` asserts that formula `f` is satisfied by the valuation.
A formula is satisfied if all clauses in it are satisfied. -/
structure Valuation.satisfies_fmla (v : Valuation) (f : Fmla) : Prop where
prop : ∀ c, c ∈ f → v.satisfies c
/-- `f.proof c` asserts that `c` is derivable from `f`. -/
def Fmla.proof (f : Fmla) (c : Clause) : Prop :=
∀ v : Valuation, v.satisfies_fmla f → v.satisfies c
/-- If `f` subsumes `c` (i.e. `c ∈ f`), then `f.proof c`. -/
theorem Fmla.proof_of_subsumes {f : Fmla} {c : Clause}
(H : Fmla.subsumes f (Fmla.one c)) : f.proof c :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1 _ <| H.1 _ <| List.Mem.head ..
/-- The core unit-propagation step.
We have a local context of assumptions `¬l'` (sometimes called an assignment)
and we wish to add `¬l` to the context, that is, we want to prove `l` is also falsified.
This is because there is a clause `a ∨ b ∨ ¬l` in the global context
such that all literals in the clause are falsified except for `¬l`;
so in the context `h₁` where we suppose that `¬l` is falsified,
the clause itself is falsified so we can prove `False`.
We continue the proof in `h₂`, with the assumption that `l` is falsified. -/
theorem Valuation.by_cases {v : Valuation} {l}
(h₁ : v.neg l.negate → False) (h₂ : v.neg l → False) : False :=
match l with
| Literal.pos _ => h₂ h₁
| Literal.neg _ => h₁ h₂
/-- `v.implies p [a, b, c] 0` definitionally unfolds to `(v 0 ↔ a) → (v 1 ↔ b) → (v 2 ↔ c) → p`.
This is used to introduce assumptions about the first `n` values of `v` during reification. -/
def Valuation.implies (v : Valuation) (p : Prop) : List Prop → Nat → Prop
| [], _ => p
| a::as, n => (v n ↔ a) → v.implies p as (n+1)
/-- `Valuation.mk [a, b, c]` is a valuation which is `a` at 0, `b` at 1 and `c` at 2, and false
everywhere else. -/
def Valuation.mk : List Prop → Valuation
| [], _ => False
| a::_, 0 => a
| _::as, n+1 => mk as n
|
/-- The fundamental relationship between `mk` and `implies`:
`(mk ps).implies p ps 0` is equivalent to `p`. -/
theorem Valuation.mk_implies {p} {as ps} (as₁) : as = List.reverseAux as₁ ps →
(Valuation.mk as).implies p ps as₁.length → p := by
induction ps generalizing as₁ with
| nil => exact fun _ ↦ id
| cons a as ih =>
refine fun e H ↦ @ih (a::as₁) e (H ?_)
subst e; clear ih H
suffices ∀ n n', n' = List.length as₁ + n →
| Mathlib/Tactic/Sat/FromLRAT.lean | 156 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SFinite ν] [SFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prodMk_right
apply measurable_const.prodMk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ae : (ae μ)⁻¹ = ae μ := by
refine le_antisymm (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae ?_
nth_rewrite 1 [← inv_inv (ae μ)]
exact Filter.map_mono (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventuallyConst_inv_set_ae :
EventuallyConst (s⁻¹ : Set G) (ae μ) ↔ EventuallyConst s (ae μ) := by
rw [← inv_preimage, eventuallyConst_preimage, Filter.map_inv, inv_ae]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
have := map_map (μ := μ) (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
rw [← this]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
setLIntegral_one]
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false] at h1
exact h1
section SigmaFinite
variable (μ' ν' : Measure G) [SigmaFinite μ'] [SigmaFinite ν'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ']
[IsMulLeftInvariant ν']
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top (hμs : μ' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
wlog sm : MeasurableSet s generalizing s
· filter_upwards [this ((measure_toMeasurable _).trans_ne hμs) (measurableSet_toMeasurable ..)]
with x hx using lt_of_le_of_lt (by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable) hx
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν'.inv _ ?_
intro A hA _ h3A
simp only [ν'.inv_apply] at h3A
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν' sm)
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ' ν' sm (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv)
rw [lintegral_indicator hA.inv] at h1
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, setLIntegral_one, ← image_inv_eq_inv, indicator_image inv_injective,
image_inv_eq_inv, ← indicator_mul_right _ fun x => ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s), Function.comp,
Pi.one_apply, mul_one] at h1
rw [← lintegral_indicator hA, ← h1]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs h3A.ne
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν' ν' h3s).filter_mono ?_
refine (absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant μ' ν' ?_).ae_le
refine mt ?_ h2s
intro hν
rw [hν, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A].
Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that
`μ t = c * μ s` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos].
In the last line, the equality `g(x⁻¹)ν(sx⁻¹) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that
`0 < ν(sx⁻¹) < ∞`. The first inequality follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is
not justified. We prove this inequality for almost all `x` in
`MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`. -/
@[to_additive
"A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. Note that
if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that `μ t = c * μ s` for a
constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos]. In the last line, the equality
`g(-x) + ν(s - x) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that `0 < ν(s - x) < ∞`. The first inequality
follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is not justified. We prove this inequality for
almost all `x` in `MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`."]
theorem measure_lintegral_div_measure (sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞)
(f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ' s * ∫⁻ y, f y⁻¹ / ν' ((· * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν') = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ' := by
set g := fun y => f y⁻¹ / ν' ((fun x => x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)
have hg : Measurable g :=
(hf.comp measurable_inv).div ((measurable_measure_mul_right ν' sm).comp measurable_inv)
simp_rw [measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ' ν' sm g hg, g, inv_inv]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero μ' ν' h2s h3s).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp_rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_mul_right_ne_zero ν' h2s _) hx.ne]
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_measure_eq (s t : Set G) (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞) :
μ' s * ν' t = ν' s * μ' t := by
wlog hs : MeasurableSet s generalizing s
· rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ' ν' s with ⟨s', -, hm, hμ, hν⟩
rw [← hμ, ← hν, this s' _ _ hm] <;> rwa [hν]
wlog ht : MeasurableSet t generalizing t
· rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ' ν' t with ⟨t', -, hm, hμ, hν⟩
rw [← hμ, ← hν, this _ hm]
have h1 := measure_lintegral_div_measure ν' ν' hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
have h2 := measure_lintegral_div_measure μ' ν' hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
rw [lintegral_indicator ht, setLIntegral_one] at h1 h2
rw [← h1, mul_left_comm, h2]
/-- Left invariant Borel measures on a measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). -/
@[to_additive
" Left invariant Borel measures on an additive measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). "]
theorem measure_eq_div_smul (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞) :
μ' = (μ' s / ν' s) • ν' := by
ext1 t -
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm,
measure_mul_measure_eq μ' ν' s t h2s h3s, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel h2s h3s]
end SigmaFinite
end LeftInvariant
section RightInvariant
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_right]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_right [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
MeasurePreserving.skew_product (g := fun x y => y * x) (MeasurePreserving.id μ)
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst) <| Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_right_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, xy)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap_right
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x + y)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul_right ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (xy, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (x + y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 * z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
measurePreserving_swap.comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right μ ν)
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` is measure-preserving. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_sub "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_div [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.2 / z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul_right μ ν).symm (MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight G).symm
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x / y)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_sub_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, x - y)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_div_swap [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.1 / z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_div ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x / y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_sub_prod
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (x - y, y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_div_prod [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 / z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
measurePreserving_swap.comp (measurePreserving_prod_div_swap μ ν)
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (xy, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg_right
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x + y, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv_right [IsMulRightInvariant μ] [IsMulRightInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1 * z.2, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_div_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap_right μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, div_mul_eq_div_div_swap, div_self', one_div]
end RightInvariant
section QuasiMeasurePreserving
variable [MeasurableInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
rw [← μ.inv_inv]
exact
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ.inv).mono (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ.inv)
(absolutelyContinuous_inv μ.inv)
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => g / h) μ μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact
(measurePreserving_mul_left μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving.comp (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ)
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => g / h) μ μ := by
rw [← μ.inv_inv]
exact
(quasiMeasurePreserving_div_left μ.inv g).mono (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ.inv)
(absolutelyContinuous_inv μ.inv)
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div_of_right_invariant [IsMulRightInvariant μ] :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun p : G × G => p.1 / p.2) (μ.prod ν) μ := by
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left measurable_div (Eventually.of_forall fun y => ?_)
exact (measurePreserving_div_right μ y).quasiMeasurePreserving
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_div [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun p : G × G => p.1 / p.2) (μ.prod ν) μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_div_of_right_invariant μ.inv ν).mono
((absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).prod AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl) (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ)
/-- A *left*-invariant measure is quasi-preserved by *right*-multiplication.
This should not be confused with `(measurePreserving_mul_right μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving`. -/
@[to_additive
"A *left*-invariant measure is quasi-preserved by *right*-addition.
This should not be confused with `(measurePreserving_add_right μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving`. "]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_mul_right [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => h * g) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_mul_const g, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
/-- A *right*-invariant measure is quasi-preserved by *left*-multiplication.
This should not be confused with `(measurePreserving_mul_left μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving`. -/
@[to_additive
"A *right*-invariant measure is quasi-preserved by *left*-addition.
This should not be confused with `(measurePreserving_add_left μ g).quasiMeasurePreserving`. "]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_mul_left [IsMulRightInvariant μ] (g : G) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (fun h : G => g * h) μ μ := by
have :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_mul_right μ.inv g⁻¹).mono (inv_absolutelyContinuous μ.inv)
(absolutelyContinuous_inv μ.inv)
rw [μ.inv_inv] at this
have :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv_of_right_invariant μ).comp
(this.comp (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv_of_right_invariant μ))
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv] at this
exact this
end QuasiMeasurePreserving
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 469 | 472 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.NoZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series - Inverses
This file defines multivariate formal power series and develops the basic
properties of these objects, when it comes about multiplicative inverses.
For `φ : MvPowerSeries σ R` and `u : Rˣ` is the constant coefficient of `φ`,
`MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit φ u` is a formal power series such,
and `MvPowerSeries.mul_invOfUnit` proves that `φ * invOfUnit φ u = 1`.
The construction of the power series `invOfUnit` is done by writing that
relation and solving and for its coefficients by induction.
Over a field, all power series `φ` have an “inverse” `MvPowerSeries.inv φ`,
which is `0` if and only if the constant coefficient of `φ` is zero
(by `MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_zero`),
and `MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_cancel` asserts the equality `φ * φ⁻¹ = 1` when
the constant coefficient of `φ` is nonzero.
Instances are defined:
* Formal power series over a local ring form a local ring.
* The morphism `MvPowerSeries.map σ f : MvPowerSeries σ A →* MvPowerSeries σ B`
induced by a local morphism `f : A →+* B` (`IsLocalHom f`)
of commutative rings is a *local* morphism.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-
The inverse of a multivariate formal power series is defined by
well-founded recursion on the coefficients of the inverse.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition that unifies
the totalised inverse formal power series `(_)⁻¹` and
the inverse formal power series that depends on
an inverse of the constant coefficient `invOfUnit`. -/
protected noncomputable def inv.aux (a : R) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R
| n =>
letI := Classical.decEq σ
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, if _ : x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * inv.aux a φ x.2 else 0
termination_by n => n
theorem coeff_inv_aux [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) =
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 :=
show inv.aux a φ n = _ by
cases Subsingleton.elim ‹DecidableEq σ› (Classical.decEq σ)
rw [inv.aux]
rfl
/-- A multivariate formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible. -/
def invOfUnit (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) : MvPowerSeries σ R :=
inv.aux (↑u⁻¹) φ
theorem coeff_invOfUnit [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) :
coeff R n (invOfUnit φ u) =
if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹
else
| -↑u⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (invOfUnit φ u) else 0 := by
convert coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹) φ
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invOfUnit (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (u : Rˣ) :
constantCoeff σ R (invOfUnit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Inverse.lean | 90 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
| unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 361 | 368 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s - 1 / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
simp_rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, if_true]
/-- The modified completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s) + 1 / s + 1 / (1 - s)` is entire. -/
theorem differentiable_completedZeta₀ : Differentiable ℂ completedRiemannZeta₀ :=
differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_completedZeta {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ completedRiemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 (Or.inl hs) hs'
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ₀`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ₀(1 - s) = Λ₀ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta₀ (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero, ← completedCosZeta₀_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub]
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ (1 - s) = Λ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero, ← completedCosZeta_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub]
/-- The residue of `Λ(s)` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedRiemannZeta_residue_one :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedRiemannZeta s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one 0
/-!
## The un-completed Riemann zeta function
-/
/-- The Riemann zeta function `ζ(s)`. -/
def riemannZeta := hurwitzZetaEven 0
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZetaEven_zero : hurwitzZetaEven 0 = riemannZeta := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.cosZeta_zero : cosZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
simp_rw [cosZeta, riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, if_true, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero,
completedCosZeta_zero]
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZeta_zero : hurwitzZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
simpa [hurwitzZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_zero] using hurwitzZetaOdd_neg 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.expZeta_zero : expZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
rw [expZeta, cosZeta_zero, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro I_ne_zero, false_or,
← eq_neg_self_iff, ← sinZeta_neg, neg_zero]
/-- The Riemann zeta function is differentiable away from `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_riemannZeta {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ riemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven _ hs'
/-- We have `ζ(0) = -1 / 2`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_zero : riemannZeta 0 = -1 / 2 := by
| simp_rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_self, if_true]
lemma riemannZeta_def_of_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
riemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta s / Gammaℝ s := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 138 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.Nontrivial := by
rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩
exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.einfsep ≠ ∞) : s.Nontrivial :=
nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hs)
theorem Subsingleton.einfsep (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s.einfsep = ∞ := by
rw [einfsep_top]
exact fun _ hx _ hy hxy => (hxy <| hs hx hy).elim
theorem le_einfsep_image_iff {d} {f : β → α} {s : Set β} : d ≤ einfsep (f '' s)
↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≠ f y → d ≤ edist (f x) (f y) := by
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, forall_mem_image]
theorem le_edist_of_le_einfsep {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hd : d ≤ s.einfsep) : d ≤ edist x y :=
le_einfsep_iff.1 hd x hx y hy hxy
theorem einfsep_le_edist_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) :
s.einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
le_edist_of_le_einfsep hx hy hxy le_rfl
theorem einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hxy' : edist x y ≤ d) : s.einfsep ≤ d :=
le_trans (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hx hy hxy) hxy'
theorem le_einfsep {d} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y) : d ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep_iff.2 h
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_empty : (∅ : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_empty.einfsep
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_singleton : ({x} : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_singleton.einfsep
theorem einfsep_iUnion_mem_option {ι : Type*} (o : Option ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
(⋃ i ∈ o, s i).einfsep = ⨅ i ∈ o, (s i).einfsep := by cases o <;> simp
theorem einfsep_anti (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.einfsep ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep fun _x hx _y hy => einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (hst hx) (hst hy)
theorem einfsep_insert_le : (insert x s).einfsep ≤ ⨅ (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y := by
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
exact fun _ hy hxy => einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy) hxy
theorem le_einfsep_pair : edist x y ⊓ edist y x ≤ ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep := by
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, inf_le_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
rintro a (rfl | rfl) b (rfl | rfl) hab <;> (try simp only [le_refl, true_or, or_true]) <;>
contradiction
theorem einfsep_pair_le_left (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _)) hxy
theorem einfsep_pair_le_right (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep ≤ edist y x := by
rw [pair_comm]; exact einfsep_pair_le_left hxy.symm
|
theorem einfsep_pair_eq_inf (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep = edist x y ⊓ edist y x :=
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 132 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
/-!
# Absolute values in ordered groups
The absolute value of an element in a group which is also a lattice is its supremum with its
negation. This generalizes the usual absolute value on real numbers (`|x| = max x (-x)`).
## Notations
- `|a|`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of an additive lattice ordered group
- `|a|ₘ`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of a multiplicative lattice ordered group
-/
open Function
variable {G : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_pow (n : ℕ) (a : G) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 1
· rw [mabs_of_le_one ha, ← mabs_inv, ← inv_pow, mabs_of_one_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le' (one_le_inv'.2 ha) n
· rw [mabs_of_one_le ha, mabs_of_one_le (one_le_pow_of_one_le' ha n)]
@[to_additive] private lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ha | ha := le_or_lt 1 a <;> obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt 1 b
· simp [ha, hb, mabs_of_one_le, one_le_mul ha hb]
· exact (lt_irrefl (1 : G) <| ha.trans_lt <| hab.trans_lt hb).elim
swap
· simp [ha.le, hb.le, mabs_of_le_one, mul_le_one', mul_comm]
have : (|a * b|ₘ = a⁻¹ * b ↔ b ≤ 1) ↔
(|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1) := by
simp [ha.le, ha.not_le, hb, mabs_of_le_one, mabs_of_one_le]
refine this.mp ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp only [h.antisymm hb, mabs_of_lt_one ha, mul_one]⟩
obtain ab | ab := le_or_lt (a * b) 1
· refine (eq_one_of_inv_eq' ?_).le
rwa [mabs_of_le_one ab, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm, mul_right_inj] at h
· rw [mabs_of_one_lt ab, mul_left_inj] at h
rw [eq_one_of_inv_eq' h.symm] at ha
cases ha.false
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_iff (a b : G) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ab | ab := le_total a b
· exact mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
· simpa only [mul_comm, and_comm] using mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le : |a|ₘ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b := by rw [mabs_le', and_comm, inv_le']
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mabs' : a ≤ |b|ₘ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ ∨ a ≤ b := by rw [le_mabs, or_comm, le_inv']
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
(mabs_le.mp h).1
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
(mabs_le.mp h).2
/-- The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedCommGroup`s. -/
@[to_additive "The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`s."]
theorem mabs_mul (a b : G) : |a * b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [mabs_le, mul_inv]
constructor <;> gcongr <;> apply_rules [inv_mabs_le, le_mabs_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul' (a b : G) : |a|ₘ ≤ |b|ₘ * |b * a|ₘ := by simpa using mabs_mul b⁻¹ (b * a)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div (a b : G) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mabs_inv b]
exact mabs_mul a _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_iff : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c ↔ a / b ≤ c ∧ b / a ≤ c := by
rw [mabs_le, inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul', and_comm, div_le_iff_le_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_lt_iff : |a / b|ₘ < c ↔ a / b < c ∧ b / a < c := by
rw [mabs_lt, inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul', div_lt_iff_lt_mul', and_comm, div_lt_iff_lt_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : b / c ≤ a :=
div_le_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_le_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_right (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : b / c < a :=
div_lt_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_lt_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_right (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : a / c < b :=
div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |a|ₘ / |b|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
div_le_iff_le_mul.2 <|
calc
|a|ₘ = |a / b * b|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |(|a|ₘ / |b|ₘ)|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2
⟨mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div _ _, by rw [mabs_div_comm]; apply mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div⟩
/-- `|a / b|ₘ ≤ n` if `1 ≤ a ≤ n` and `1 ≤ b ≤ n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a - b| ≤ n` if `0 ≤ a ≤ n` and `0 ≤ b ≤ n`."]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_one_le_of_le {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_le_n : a ≤ n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_le_n : b ≤ n) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ n := by
rw [mabs_div_le_iff, div_le_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul]
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_of_one_le a_le_n one_le_b, le_mul_of_le_of_one_le b_le_n one_le_a⟩
/-- `|a - b| < n` if `0 ≤ a < n` and `0 ≤ b < n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a / b|ₘ < n` if `1 ≤ a < n` and `1 ≤ b < n`."]
theorem mabs_div_lt_of_one_le_of_lt {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_lt_n : a < n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_lt_n : b < n) : |a / b|ₘ < n := by
rw [mabs_div_lt_iff, div_lt_iff_lt_mul, div_lt_iff_lt_mul]
exact ⟨lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le a_lt_n one_le_b, lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le b_lt_n one_le_a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_eq (hb : 1 ≤ b) : |a|ₘ = b ↔ a = b ∨ a = b⁻¹ := by
refine ⟨eq_or_eq_inv_of_mabs_eq, ?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [mabs_inv, mabs_of_one_le hb]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le_max_mabs_mabs (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : |b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |c|ₘ :=
mabs_le'.2
⟨by simp [hbc.trans (le_mabs_self c)], by
simp [(inv_le_inv_iff.mpr hab).trans (inv_le_mabs a)]⟩
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_max : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |max a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_right h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_left h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_min : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |min a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_left h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_right h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_max_le_max_mabs_mabs : |max a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _)
fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_min_le_max_mabs_mabs : |min a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| min_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _) fun h =>
(congr_arg _ <| min_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one {a b : G} (h : |a / b|ₘ = 1) : a = b :=
div_eq_one.1 <| mabs_eq_one.1 h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le (a b c : G) : |a / c|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ :=
calc
|a / c|ₘ = |a / b * (b / c)|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_div_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul_three (a b c : G) : |a * b * c|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ * |c|ₘ :=
(mabs_mul _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' (mabs_mul _ _) _)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_le_of_le {a b lb ub : G} (hal : lb ≤ a) (hau : a ≤ ub) (hbl : lb ≤ b)
(hbu : b ≤ ub) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ ub / lb :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2 ⟨div_le_div'' hau hbl, div_le_div'' hbu hal⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias dist_bdd_within_interval := abs_sub_le_of_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_le_one (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1) : a = b :=
eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one (le_antisymm h (one_le_mabs (a / b)))
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_lt_all {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ < ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_lt_iff_le'.mp h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_le_all [DenselyOrdered G] {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ ≤ ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense.mp h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_one : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mabs_div_le_one, by rintro rfl; rw [div_self', mabs_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_pos : 1 < |a / b|ₘ ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_le.symm.trans mabs_div_le_one.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mabs_eq_self : |a|ₘ = a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [mabs_eq_max_inv, max_eq_left_iff, inv_le_self_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mabs_eq_inv_self : |a|ₘ = a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [mabs_eq_max_inv, max_eq_right_iff, le_inv_self_iff]
/-- For an element `a` of a multiplicative linear ordered group,
either `|a|ₘ = a` and `1 ≤ a`, or `|a|ₘ = a⁻¹` and `a < 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"For an element `a` of an additive linear ordered group,
either `|a| = a` and `0 ≤ a`, or `|a| = -a` and `a < 0`.
Use cases on this lemma to automate linarith in inequalities"]
theorem mabs_cases (a : G) : |a|ₘ = a ∧ 1 ≤ a ∨ |a|ₘ = a⁻¹ ∧ a < 1 := by
cases le_or_lt 1 a <;> simp [*, le_of_lt]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem max_one_mul_max_inv_one_eq_mabs_self (a : G) : max a 1 * max a⁻¹ 1 = |a|ₘ := by
symm
rcases le_total 1 a with (ha | ha) <;> simp [ha]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le' {H : Type*} [MulOneClass H] [LE H]
[MulLeftMono H] [MulRightMono H] {f : G → H}
{a : G} (h₁ : 1 ≤ f a) (h₂ : 1 ≤ f (-a)) : f |a| ≤ f a * f (-a) :=
(le_total a 0).rec (fun ha => (abs_of_nonpos ha).symm ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_left' h₁) fun ha =>
(abs_of_nonneg ha).symm ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_right' h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le {H : Type*} [MulOneClass H] [LE H]
[MulLeftMono H] [MulRightMono H] {f : G → H}
(h : ∀ x, 1 ≤ f x) (a : G) : f |a| ≤ f a * f (-a) :=
apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le' (h _) (h _)
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Abs.lean | 460 | 462 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
/-!
# Normed groups homomorphisms
This file gathers definitions and elementary constructions about bounded group homomorphisms
between normed (abelian) groups (abbreviated to "normed group homs").
The main lemmas relate the boundedness condition to continuity and Lipschitzness.
The main construction is to endow the type of normed group homs between two given normed groups
with a group structure and a norm, giving rise to a normed group structure. We provide several
simple constructions for normed group homs, like kernel, range and equalizer.
Some easy other constructions are related to subgroups of normed groups.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `SeminormedAddGroupHom` and we specialize to `NormedAddGroupHom` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal
-- TODO: migrate to the new morphism / morphism_class style
/-- A morphism of seminormed abelian groups is a bounded group homomorphism. -/
structure NormedAddGroupHom (V W : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] where
/-- The function underlying a `NormedAddGroupHom` -/
toFun : V → W
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is additive. -/
map_add' : ∀ v₁ v₂, toFun (v₁ + v₂) = toFun v₁ + toFun v₂
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is bounded. -/
bound' : ∃ C, ∀ v, ‖toFun v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup W]
{f g : NormedAddGroupHom V W}
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'` for a version that uses `ℝ≥0` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ v, ‖f v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖) : NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, h⟩ }
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom` for a version that uses `ℝ` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ≥0) (hC : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) :
NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, hC⟩ }
end AddMonoidHom
theorem exists_pos_bound_of_bound {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] {f : V → W} (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) :
∃ N, 0 < N ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖ :=
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), fun x =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖ := h x
_ ≤ max M 1 * ‖x‖ := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
⟩
namespace NormedAddGroupHom
variable {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₃]
variable {f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂}
/-- A Lipschitz continuous additive homomorphism is a normed additive group homomorphism. -/
def ofLipschitz (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ :=
f.mkNormedAddGroupHom K fun x ↦ by simpa only [map_zero, dist_zero_right] using h.dist_le_mul x 0
instance funLike : FunLike (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance toAddMonoidHomClass : AddMonoidHomClass (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := (AddMonoidHom.mk' f.toFun f.map_add').map_zero
initialize_simps_projections NormedAddGroupHom (toFun → apply)
theorem coe_inj (H : (f : V₁ → V₂) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (V₁ → V₂) toFun := by
apply coe_inj
theorem coe_inj_iff : f = g ↔ (f : V₁ → V₂) = g :=
⟨congr_arg _, coe_inj⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_inj <| funext H
variable (f g)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_mk (f) (h₁) (h₂) (h₃) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C hC) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom' C hC) = f :=
rfl
/-- The group homomorphism underlying a bounded group homomorphism. -/
def toAddMonoidHom (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : V₁ →+ V₂ :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' f f.map_add'
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom : ⇑f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective :
Function.Injective (@NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom V₁ V₂ _ _) := fun f g h =>
coe_inj <| by rw [← coe_toAddMonoidHom f, ← coe_toAddMonoidHom g, h]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toAddMonoidHom (f) (h₁) (h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂).toAddMonoidHom = AddMonoidHom.mk' f h₁ :=
rfl
theorem bound : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := f.bound'
exists_pos_bound_of_bound _ hC
theorem antilipschitz_of_norm_ge {K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, map_sub] using h (x - y)
/-- A normed group hom is surjective on the subgroup `K` with constant `C` if every element
`x` of `K` has a preimage whose norm is bounded above by `C*‖x‖`. This is a more
abstract version of `f` having a right inverse defined on `K` with operator norm
at most `C`. -/
def SurjectiveOnWith (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (K : AddSubgroup V₂) (C : ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ h ∈ K, ∃ g, f g = h ∧ ‖g‖ ≤ C * ‖h‖
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.mono {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C C' : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) (H : C ≤ C') : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
intro k k_in
rcases h k k_in with ⟨g, rfl, hg⟩
use g, rfl
by_cases Hg : ‖f g‖ = 0
· simpa [Hg] using hg
· exact hg.trans (by gcongr)
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : ∃ C' > 0, f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
refine ⟨|C| + 1, ?_, ?_⟩
· linarith [abs_nonneg C]
· apply h.mono
linarith [le_abs_self C]
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : Set.SurjOn f Set.univ K := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).imp fun _a ⟨ha, _⟩ => ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ha⟩
/-! ### The operator norm -/
/-- The operator norm of a seminormed group homomorphism is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ }
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
rfl
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
theorem opNorm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm: `‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := by
obtain ⟨C, _Cpos, hC⟩ := f.bound
replace hC := hC x
by_cases h : ‖x‖ = 0
· rwa [h, mul_zero] at hC ⊢
have hlt : 0 < ‖x‖ := lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg x) (Ne.symm h)
exact
(div_le_iff₀ hlt).mp
(le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun c ⟨_, hc⟩ => (div_le_iff₀ hlt).mpr <| by apply hc)
theorem le_opNorm_of_le {c : ℝ} {x} (h : ‖x‖ ≤ c) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * c :=
le_trans (f.le_opNorm x) (by gcongr; exact f.opNorm_nonneg)
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {c : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ c) (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ :=
(f.le_opNorm x).trans (by gcongr)
/-- continuous linear maps are Lipschitz continuous. -/
theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith ⟨‖f‖, opNorm_nonneg f⟩ f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← map_sub]
apply le_opNorm
protected theorem uniformContinuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : UniformContinuous f :=
f.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : Continuous f :=
f.uniformContinuous.continuous
instance : ContinuousMapClass (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
map_continuous := fun f => f.continuous
theorem ratio_le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ / ‖x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_le_mul₀ (norm_nonneg _) f.opNorm_nonneg (le_opNorm _ _)
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
theorem opNorm_eq_of_bounds {M : ℝ} (M_nonneg : 0 ≤ M) (h_above : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖)
(h_below : ∀ N ≥ 0, (∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖) → M ≤ N) : ‖f‖ = M :=
le_antisymm (f.opNorm_le_bound M_nonneg h_above)
((le_csInf_iff NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_bddBelow ⟨M, M_nonneg, h_above⟩).mpr
fun N ⟨N_nonneg, hN⟩ => h_below N N_nonneg hN)
theorem opNorm_le_of_lipschitz {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖f‖ ≤ K :=
f.opNorm_le_bound K.2 fun x => by simpa only [dist_zero_right, map_zero] using hf.dist_le_mul x 0
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor
if it is nonnegative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ C :=
opNorm_le_bound _ hC h
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`NormedAddGroupHom.ofLipschitz`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor. -/
theorem ofLipschitz_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖ofLipschitz f h‖ ≤ K :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le f K.coe_nonneg _
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism
via the constructor `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound
given to the constructor or zero if this bound is negative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) fun x =>
(h x).trans <| by gcongr; apply le_max_left
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
/-! ### Addition of normed group homs -/
/-- Addition of normed group homs. -/
instance add : Add (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
(f.toAddMonoidHom + g.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) fun v =>
calc
‖f v + g v‖ ≤ ‖f v‖ + ‖g v‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ + ‖g‖ * ‖v‖ := by gcongr <;> apply le_opNorm
_ = (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) * ‖v‖ := by rw [add_mul]
⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem opNorm_add_le : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le _ (add_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) _
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f + g) v = f v + g v :=
rfl
/-! ### The zero normed group hom -/
instance zero : Zero (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨(0 : V₁ →+ V₂).mkNormedAddGroupHom 0 (by simp)⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The norm of the `0` operator is `0`. -/
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂)‖ = 0 :=
le_antisymm
(csInf_le bounds_bddBelow
⟨ge_of_eq rfl, fun _ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [zero_mul]
exact norm_zero)⟩)
(opNorm_nonneg _)
/-- For normed groups, an operator is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem opNorm_zero_iff {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₁] [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
{f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hn =>
ext fun x =>
norm_le_zero_iff.1
(calc
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ = _ := by rw [hn, zero_mul]
))
fun hf => by rw [hf, opNorm_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (v : V₁) : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = 0 :=
rfl
variable {f g}
/-! ### The identity normed group hom -/
variable (V)
/-- The identity as a continuous normed group hom. -/
@[simps!]
def id : NormedAddGroupHom V V :=
(AddMonoidHom.id V).mkNormedAddGroupHom 1 (by simp [le_refl])
/-- The norm of the identity is at most `1`. It is in fact `1`, except when the norm of every
element vanishes, where it is `0`. (Since we are working with seminorms this can happen even if the
space is non-trivial.) It means that one can not do better than an inequality in general. -/
theorem norm_id_le : ‖(id V : NormedAddGroupHom V V)‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun x => by simp
/-- If there is an element with norm different from `0`, then the norm of the identity equals `1`.
(Since we are working with seminorms supposing that the space is non-trivial is not enough.) -/
theorem norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm (h : ∃ x : V, ‖x‖ ≠ 0) : ‖id V‖ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (norm_id_le V) <| by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
have := (id V).ratio_le_opNorm x
rwa [id_apply, div_self hx] at this
/-- If a normed space is non-trivial, then the norm of the identity equals `1`. -/
theorem norm_id {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [Nontrivial V] : ‖id V‖ = 1 := by
refine norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm V ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : V)
exact ⟨x, ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)⟩
theorem coe_id : (NormedAddGroupHom.id V : V → V) = _root_.id :=
rfl
/-! ### The negation of a normed group hom -/
/-- Opposite of a normed group hom. -/
instance neg : Neg (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f => (-f.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom ‖f‖ fun v => by simp [le_opNorm f v]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(-f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = -f v :=
rfl
theorem opNorm_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
simp only [norm_def, coe_neg, norm_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
/-! ### Subtraction of normed group homs -/
/-- Subtraction of normed group homs. -/
instance sub : Sub (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ f.toAddMonoidHom - g.toAddMonoidHom with
bound' := by
simp only [AddMonoidHom.sub_apply, AddMonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact (f + -g).bound' }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f - g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = f v - g v :=
rfl
/-! ### Scalar actions on normed group homs -/
section SMul
variable {R R' : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] [DistribMulAction R V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R]
[IsBoundedSMul R V₂] [MonoidWithZero R'] [DistribMulAction R' V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R']
[IsBoundedSMul R' V₂]
instance smul : SMul R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul r f :=
| { toFun := r • ⇑f
map_add' := (r • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨dist r 0 * b, fun x => by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Hom.lean | 429 | 433 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `Data.Matrix.Basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)` defined in
`Data.Fin.VecNotation`.
This also provides the new notation `!![a, b; c, d] = Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
This notation also works for empty matrices; `!![,,,] : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 3)` and
`!![;;;] : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 0)`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
This file provide notation `!![a, b; c, d]` for matrices, which corresponds to
`Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u uₘ uₙ uₒ
variable {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' : Type uₘ} {n' : Type uₙ} {o' : Type uₒ}
open Matrix
section toExpr
open Lean Qq
open Qq in
/-- `Matrix.mkLiteralQ !![a, b; c, d]` produces the term `q(!![$a, $b; $c, $d])`. -/
def mkLiteralQ {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {m n : Nat} (elems : Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) Q($α)) :
Q(Matrix (Fin $m) (Fin $n) $α) :=
let elems := PiFin.mkLiteralQ (α := q(Fin $n → $α)) fun i => PiFin.mkLiteralQ fun j => elems i j
q(Matrix.of $elems)
/-- Matrices can be reflected whenever their entries can. We insert a `Matrix.of` to
prevent immediate decay to a function. -/
protected instance toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToLevel.{uₘ}] [ToLevel.{uₙ}]
[Lean.ToExpr α] [Lean.ToExpr m'] [Lean.ToExpr n'] [Lean.ToExpr (m' → n' → α)] :
Lean.ToExpr (Matrix m' n' α) :=
have eα : Q(Type $(toLevel.{u})) := toTypeExpr α
have em' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₘ})) := toTypeExpr m'
have en' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₙ})) := toTypeExpr n'
{ toTypeExpr :=
q(Matrix $eα $em' $en')
toExpr := fun M =>
have eM : Q($em' → $en' → $eα) := toExpr (show m' → n' → α from M)
q(Matrix.of $eM) }
end toExpr
section Parser
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
/-- Notation for m×n matrices, aka `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α`.
For instance:
* `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is the matrix with two rows and three columns, of type
`Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 3) α`
* `!![a, b, c]` is a row vector of type `Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 3) α` (see also `Matrix.row`).
* `!![a; b; c]` is a column vector of type `Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 1) α` (see also `Matrix.col`).
This notation implements some special cases:
* `![,,]`, with `n` `,`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin n) α`
* `![;;]`, with `m` `;`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin 0) α`
* `![]` is the 0×0 matrix
Note that vector notation is provided elsewhere (by `Matrix.vecNotation`) as `![a, b, c]`.
Under the hood, `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is syntax for `Matrix.of ![![a, b, c], ![d, e, f]]`.
-/
syntax (name := matrixNotation)
"!![" ppRealGroup(sepBy1(ppGroup(term,+,?), ";", "; ", allowTrailingSep)) "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotationRx0) "!![" ";"+ "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotation0xC) "!![" ","* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(!![$[$[$rows],*];*]) => do
let m := rows.size
let n := if h : 0 < m then rows[0].size else 0
let rowVecs ← rows.mapM fun row : Array Term => do
unless row.size = n do
Macro.throwErrorAt (mkNullNode row) s!"\
Rows must be of equal length; this row has {row.size} items, \
the previous rows have {n}"
`(![$row,*])
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote m)) (Fin $(quote n)) _ ![$rowVecs,*])
| `(!![$[;%$semicolons]*]) => do
let emptyVec ← `(![])
let emptyVecs := semicolons.map (fun _ => emptyVec)
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote semicolons.size)) (Fin 0) _ ![$emptyVecs,*])
| `(!![$[,%$commas]*]) => `(@Matrix.of (Fin 0) (Fin $(quote commas.size)) _ ![])
/-- Delaborator for the `!![]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def delabMatrixNotation : Delab := whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
withOverApp 6 do
let mkApp3 (.const ``Matrix.of _) (.app (.const ``Fin _) em) (.app (.const ``Fin _) en) _ :=
(← getExpr).appFn!.appArg! | failure
let some m ← withNatValue em (pure ∘ some) | failure
let some n ← withNatValue en (pure ∘ some) | failure
withAppArg do
if m = 0 then
guard <| (← getExpr).isAppOfArity ``vecEmpty 1
let commas := .replicate n (mkAtom ",")
`(!![$[,%$commas]*])
else
if n = 0 then
let `(![$[![]%$evecs],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[;%$evecs]*])
else
let `(![$[![$[$melems],*]],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[$[$melems],*];*])
end Parser
variable (a b : ℕ)
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `Fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval !![1, 2; 3, 4] + !![3, 4; 5, 6] -- !![4, 6; 8, 10]
```
-/
instance repr [Repr α] : Repr (Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α) where
reprPrec f _p :=
(Std.Format.bracket "!![" · "]") <|
(Std.Format.joinSep · (";" ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange m).map fun i =>
Std.Format.fill <| -- wrap line in a single place rather than all at once
(Std.Format.joinSep · ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange n).map fun j => _root_.repr (f i j)
@[simp]
theorem cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : Fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vecCons v B i j = vecCons (v j) (fun i => B i j) i := by refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') : (vecHead fun i => B i j) = vecHead B j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
(vecTail fun i => B i j) = fun i => vecTail B i j := rfl
section DotProduct
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_empty (v w : Fin 0 → α) : dotProduct v w = 0 :=
Finset.sum_empty
@[simp]
theorem cons_dotProduct (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : Fin n.succ → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) w = x * vecHead w + dotProduct v (vecTail w) := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct v (vecCons x w) = vecHead v * x + dotProduct (vecTail v) w := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
| theorem cons_dotProduct_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (y : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) (vecCons y w) = x * y + dotProduct v w := by simp
end DotProduct
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Notation.lean | 190 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
/-!
# Algebraic properties of multiset intervals
This file provides results about the interaction of algebra with `Multiset.Ixx`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
lemma map_add_left_Icc (a b c : α) : (Icc a b).map (c + ·) = Icc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Icc, Icc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Icc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ico (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).map (c + ·) = Ico (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ico, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioc (a b c : α) : (Ioc a b).map (c + ·) = Ioc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioc, Ioc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioo (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).map (c + ·) = Ioo (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioo, Ioo, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioo, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_right_Icc (a b c : α) : ((Icc a b).map fun x => x + c) = Icc (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Icc _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ico (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ico (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Ico _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ioc (a b c : α) : ((Ioc a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ioc (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
| exact map_add_left_Ioc _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ioo (a b c : α) : ((Ioo a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ioo (a + c) (b + c) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 47 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Norm
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,059 | 1,064 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
/-!
# Congruences modulo an integer
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` on the integers, similarly to how
`Data.Nat.ModEq` defines them for the natural numbers. The notation is short for `n.ModEq a b`,
which is defined to be `a % n = b % n` for integers `a b n`.
## Tags
modeq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo, integers
-/
namespace Int
/-- `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` when `a % n = b % n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℤ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [ZMOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℤ}
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := decEq (a % n) (b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl, simp]
protected theorem refl (a : ℤ) : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
@rfl _ _
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ c [ZMOD n] → a ≡ c [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : IsTrans ℤ (ModEq n) where
trans := @Int.ModEq.trans n
protected theorem eq : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → a % n = b % n := id
end ModEq
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [ZMOD n] := ⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
theorem natCast_modEq_iff {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
unfold ModEq Nat.ModEq; rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]; simp [natCast_mod]
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by
rw [ModEq, zero_emod, dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_int (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_int (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_int.symm
| theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/ModEq.lean | 77 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.BinaryProducts
/-!
# Limits involving zero objects
Binary products and coproducts with a zero object always exist,
and pullbacks/pushouts over a zero object are products/coproducts.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [HasZeroObject C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
open ZeroObject
/-- The limit cone for the product with a zero object. -/
def binaryFanZeroLeft (X : C) : BinaryFan (0 : C) X :=
BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 X)
/-- The limit cone for the product with a zero object is limiting. -/
def binaryFanZeroLeftIsLimit (X : C) : IsLimit (binaryFanZeroLeft X) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => BinaryFan.snd s) (by aesop_cat) (by simp)
(fun s m _ h₂ => by simpa using h₂)
instance hasBinaryProduct_zero_left (X : C) : HasBinaryProduct (0 : C) X :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, binaryFanZeroLeftIsLimit X⟩
/-- A zero object is a left unit for categorical product. -/
def zeroProdIso (X : C) : (0 : C) ⨯ X ≅ X :=
limit.isoLimitCone ⟨_, binaryFanZeroLeftIsLimit X⟩
@[simp]
theorem zeroProdIso_hom (X : C) : (zeroProdIso X).hom = prod.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroProdIso_inv_snd (X : C) : (zeroProdIso X).inv ≫ prod.snd = 𝟙 X := by
dsimp [zeroProdIso, binaryFanZeroLeft]
simp
/-- The limit cone for the product with a zero object. -/
def binaryFanZeroRight (X : C) : BinaryFan X (0 : C) :=
BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0
/-- The limit cone for the product with a zero object is limiting. -/
def binaryFanZeroRightIsLimit (X : C) : IsLimit (binaryFanZeroRight X) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => BinaryFan.fst s) (by simp) (by aesop_cat)
(fun s m h₁ _ => by simpa using h₁)
instance hasBinaryProduct_zero_right (X : C) : HasBinaryProduct X (0 : C) :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, binaryFanZeroRightIsLimit X⟩
/-- A zero object is a right unit for categorical product. -/
def prodZeroIso (X : C) : X ⨯ (0 : C) ≅ X :=
limit.isoLimitCone ⟨_, binaryFanZeroRightIsLimit X⟩
@[simp]
theorem prodZeroIso_hom (X : C) : (prodZeroIso X).hom = prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodZeroIso_iso_inv_snd (X : C) : (prodZeroIso X).inv ≫ prod.fst = 𝟙 X := by
dsimp [prodZeroIso, binaryFanZeroRight]
simp
/-- The colimit cocone for the coproduct with a zero object. -/
def binaryCofanZeroLeft (X : C) : BinaryCofan (0 : C) X :=
BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 X)
/-- The colimit cocone for the coproduct with a zero object is colimiting. -/
def binaryCofanZeroLeftIsColimit (X : C) : IsColimit (binaryCofanZeroLeft X) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => BinaryCofan.inr s) (by aesop_cat) (by simp)
(fun s m _ h₂ => by simpa using h₂)
instance hasBinaryCoproduct_zero_left (X : C) : HasBinaryCoproduct (0 : C) X :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, binaryCofanZeroLeftIsColimit X⟩
/-- A zero object is a left unit for categorical coproduct. -/
def zeroCoprodIso (X : C) : (0 : C) ⨿ X ≅ X :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, binaryCofanZeroLeftIsColimit X⟩
@[simp]
theorem inr_zeroCoprodIso_hom (X : C) : coprod.inr ≫ (zeroCoprodIso X).hom = 𝟙 X := by
dsimp [zeroCoprodIso, binaryCofanZeroLeft]
simp
@[simp]
theorem zeroCoprodIso_inv (X : C) : (zeroCoprodIso X).inv = coprod.inr :=
rfl
/-- The colimit cocone for the coproduct with a zero object. -/
def binaryCofanZeroRight (X : C) : BinaryCofan X (0 : C) :=
BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0
/-- The colimit cocone for the coproduct with a zero object is colimiting. -/
def binaryCofanZeroRightIsColimit (X : C) : IsColimit (binaryCofanZeroRight X) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => BinaryCofan.inl s) (by simp) (by aesop_cat)
(fun s m h₁ _ => by simpa using h₁)
instance hasBinaryCoproduct_zero_right (X : C) : HasBinaryCoproduct X (0 : C) :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, binaryCofanZeroRightIsColimit X⟩
|
/-- A zero object is a right unit for categorical coproduct. -/
def coprodZeroIso (X : C) : X ⨿ (0 : C) ≅ X :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Constructions/ZeroObjects.lean | 115 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one]
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x := by
simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
theorem le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc]
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI)
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ I ≤ J := by
simp_rw [span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, mul_right_inj' hx,
exists_eq_right', SetLike.le_def]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} ≤ J * span {x} ↔ I ≤ J := by
simpa only [mul_comm I, mul_comm J] using span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I = span {x} * J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} = J * span {x} ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_left_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective ((span {x} : Ideal R) * ·) := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx).mp
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun I : Ideal R => I * span {x} := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_left_inj hx).mp
theorem eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
theorem span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
(∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧ ∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → Set R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span (I i)) = Ideal.span (∏ i ∈ s, I i) :=
Submodule.prod_span s I
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} :=
Submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
@[simp]
theorem multiset_prod_span_singleton (m : Multiset R) :
(m.map fun x => Ideal.span {x}).prod = Ideal.span ({Multiset.prod m} : Set R) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) fun a m ih => by
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, ih, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (IsCoprime on I)) :
(s.inf fun i => Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_finset_inf, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI, fun h i hi => (Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
theorem iInf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I : ι → R}
(hI : ∀ (i j) (_ : i ≠ j), IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) :
⨅ i, span ({I i} : Set R) = span {∏ i, I i} := by
rw [← Finset.inf_univ_eq_iInf, finset_inf_span_singleton]
rwa [Finset.coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem iInf_span_singleton_natCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{I : ι → ℕ} (hI : Pairwise fun i j => (I i).Coprime (I j)) :
⨅ (i : ι), span {(I i : R)} = span {((∏ i : ι, I i : ℕ) : R)} := by
rw [iInf_span_singleton, Nat.cast_prod]
exact fun i j h ↦ (hI h).cast
theorem sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : Set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩
rw [mem_span_singleton'] at hu hv
rw [← hu.choose_spec, ← hv.choose_spec] at h1
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩
· exact fun ⟨u, v, h1⟩ =>
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj => ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} : s.prod ≤ s.inf := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.inf_zero]
exact le_top
intro a s ih
rw [Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.inf_cons]
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
theorem prod_le_inf {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf fun r ⟨hri, hrj⟩ =>
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h)
mul_one r ▸
hst ▸
(mul_add r s t).symm ▸ Ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) fun i hi => by
rw [eq_top_iff_one] at h; rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h hi ⊢
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, ?_⟩
rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ J := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = K ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h, sup_comm]
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_right (h : K ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right h, sup_comm]
theorem sup_prod_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ∏ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
Finset.prod_induction _ (fun J => I ⊔ J = ⊤)
(fun _ _ hJ hK => (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hJ).trans hK)
(by simp_rw [one_eq_top, sup_top_eq]) h
theorem sup_multiset_prod_eq_top {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} (h : ∀ p ∈ s, I ⊔ p = ⊤) :
I ⊔ Multiset.prod s = ⊤ :=
Multiset.prod_induction (I ⊔ · = ⊤) s (fun _ _ hp hq ↦ (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hp).trans hq)
(by simp only [one_eq_top, ge_iff_le, top_le_iff, le_top, sup_of_le_right]) h
theorem sup_iInf_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ⨅ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
le_of_eq_of_le (sup_prod_eq_top h).symm <|
sup_le_sup_left (le_of_le_of_eq prod_le_inf <| Finset.inf_eq_iInf _ _) _
theorem prod_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(∏ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_prod_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem iInf_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_iInf_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem sup_pow_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact sup_prod_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ n ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact prod_sup_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_pow_eq_top {m n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ m ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ :=
sup_pow_eq_top (pow_sup_eq_top h)
variable (I) in
@[simp]
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
Ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ Submodule.top_smul I
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma multiset_prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R] {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} :
s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff
theorem span_pair_mul_span_pair (w x y z : R) :
(span {w, x} : Ideal R) * span {y, z} = span {w * y, w * z, x * y, x * z} := by
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_mul, mul_sup, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, sup_assoc]
theorem isCoprime_iff_codisjoint : IsCoprime I J ↔ Codisjoint I J := by
rw [IsCoprime, codisjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
apply (show x * I + y * J ≤ I ⊔ J from
sup_le (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_left) (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_right))
rw [hxy]
simp only [one_eq_top, Submodule.mem_top]
· intro h
refine ⟨1, 1, ?_⟩
simpa only [one_eq_top, top_mul, Submodule.add_eq_sup]
theorem isCoprime_of_isMaximal [I.IsMaximal] [J.IsMaximal] (ne : I ≠ J) : IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, isMaximal_def] at *
exact IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne ‹_› ‹_› ne
theorem isCoprime_iff_add : IsCoprime I J ↔ I + J = 1 := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, add_eq_sup, one_eq_top]
theorem isCoprime_iff_exists : IsCoprime I J ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [← add_eq_one_iff, isCoprime_iff_add]
theorem isCoprime_iff_sup_eq : IsCoprime I J ↔ I ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff]
open List in
theorem isCoprime_tfae : TFAE [IsCoprime I J, Codisjoint I J, I + J = 1,
∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1, I ⊔ J = ⊤] := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, ← isCoprime_iff_add, ← isCoprime_iff_exists,
← isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
simp
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.codisjoint (h : IsCoprime I J) : Codisjoint I J :=
isCoprime_iff_codisjoint.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.add_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I + J = 1 := isCoprime_iff_add.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.exists (h : IsCoprime I J) : ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 :=
isCoprime_iff_exists.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.sup_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊔ J = ⊤ := isCoprime_iff_sup_eq.mp h
theorem inf_eq_mul_of_isCoprime (coprime : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊓ J = I * J :=
(Ideal.mul_eq_inf_of_coprime coprime.sup_eq).symm
theorem isCoprime_span_singleton_iff (x y : R) :
IsCoprime (span <| singleton x) (span <| singleton y) ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_singleton_sup,
mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, e⟩; exact ⟨a, b, mul_comm b y ▸ e⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, e⟩; exact ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, mul_comm y b ▸ e⟩
theorem isCoprime_biInf {J : ι → Ideal R} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ j ∈ s, IsCoprime I (J j)) : IsCoprime I (⨅ j ∈ s, J j) := by
classical
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_add] at *
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp
| insert i s _ hs =>
rw [Finset.iInf_insert, inf_comm, one_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← one_eq_top]
set K := ⨅ j ∈ s, J j
calc
1 = I + K := (hs fun j hj ↦ hf j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)).symm
_ = I + K*(I + J i) := by rw [hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s), mul_one]
_ = (1+K)*I + K*J i := by ring
_ ≤ I + K ⊓ J i := add_le_add mul_le_left mul_le_inf
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r ^ n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R where
carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I }
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0 : R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩
add_mem' := fun {_ _} ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩ =>
⟨m + n - 1, add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem I hxmi hyni⟩
smul_mem' {r s} := fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r ^ n) h⟩
theorem mem_radical_iff {r : R} : r ∈ I.radical ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I := Iff.rfl
/-- An ideal is radical if it contains its radical. -/
def IsRadical (I : Ideal R) : Prop :=
I.radical ≤ I
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I := fun r hri => ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
/-- An ideal is radical iff it is equal to its radical. -/
theorem radical_eq_iff : I.radical = I ↔ I.IsRadical := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left le_radical, IsRadical]
alias ⟨_, IsRadical.radical⟩ := radical_eq_iff
theorem isRadical_iff_pow_one_lt (k : ℕ) (hk : 1 < k) : I.IsRadical ↔ ∀ r, r ^ k ∈ I → r ∈ I :=
⟨fun h _r hr ↦ h ⟨k, hr⟩, fun h x ⟨n, hx⟩ ↦
k.pow_imp_self_of_one_lt hk _ (fun _ _ ↦ .inr ∘ I.smul_mem _) h n x hx⟩
variable (R) in
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, Submodule.mem_top⟩
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variable (I)
theorem radical_isRadical : (radical I).IsRadical := fun r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩ =>
⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩
@[simp]
theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
(radical_isRadical I).radical
variable {I}
theorem IsRadical.radical_le_iff (hJ : J.IsRadical) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, fun h => hJ.radical ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
(radical_isRadical J).radical_le_iff
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h =>
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <|
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn,
fun h => h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem IsPrime.isRadical (H : IsPrime I) : I.IsRadical := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ =>
H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni
theorem IsPrime.radical (H : IsPrime I) : radical I = I :=
IsRadical.radical H.isRadical
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : Ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (y : R) (hI : I.IsRadical) :
Disjoint (Submonoid.powers y : Set R) ↑I ↔ y ∉ I.1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.disjoint_left.1 h (Submonoid.mem_powers _),
fun h => disjoint_iff.mpr (eq_bot_iff.mpr ?_)⟩
rintro x ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, hx'⟩
exact h (hI <| mem_radical_of_pow_mem <| le_radical hx')
variable (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono <| sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) <|
radical_le_radical_iff.2 <| sup_le (radical_mono le_sup_left) (radical_mono le_sup_right)
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩
variable {I J} in
theorem IsRadical.inf (hI : IsRadical I) (hJ : IsRadical J) : IsRadical (I ⊓ J) := by
rw [IsRadical, radical_inf]; exact inf_le_inf hI hJ
/-- `Ideal.radical` as an `InfTopHom`, bundling in that it distributes over `inf`. -/
def radicalInfTopHom : InfTopHom (Ideal R) (Ideal R) where
toFun := radical
map_inf' := radical_inf
map_top' := radical_top _
@[simp]
lemma radicalInfTopHom_apply (I : Ideal R) : radicalInfTopHom I = radical I := rfl
open Finset in
lemma radical_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → (f y).radical = (f i).radical) :
(s.inf f).radical = (f i).radical := by
rw [← radicalInfTopHom_apply, map_finset_inf, ← Finset.inf'_eq_inf ⟨_, hi⟩]
exact Finset.inf'_eq_of_forall _ _ hs
/-- The reverse inclusion does not hold for e.g. `I := fun n : ℕ ↦ Ideal.span {(2 ^ n : ℤ)}`. -/
theorem radical_iInf_le {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) : radical (⨅ i, I i) ≤ ⨅ i, radical (I i) :=
le_iInf fun _ ↦ radical_mono (iInf_le _ _)
theorem isRadical_iInf {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) (hI : ∀ i, IsRadical (I i)) : IsRadical (⨅ i, I i) :=
(radical_iInf_le I).trans (iInf_mono hI)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩
have := radical_mono <| @mul_le_inf _ _ I J
simp_rw [radical_inf I J] at this
assumption
variable {I J}
theorem IsPrime.radical_le_iff (hJ : IsPrime J) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
IsRadical.radical_le_iff hJ.isRadical
theorem radical_eq_sInf (I : Ideal R) : radical I = sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun _ hJ ↦ hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) fun r hr ↦
by_contradiction fun hri ↦
let ⟨m, hIm, hm⟩ :=
zorn_le_nonempty₀ { K : Ideal R | r ∉ radical K }
(fun c hc hcc y hyc =>
⟨sSup c, fun ⟨n, hrnc⟩ =>
let ⟨_, hyc, hrny⟩ := (Submodule.mem_sSup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directedOn).1 hrnc
hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
I hri
have hrm : r ∉ radical m := hm.prop
have : ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := fun x hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hrmx => hxm <| by
rw [hm.eq_of_le hrmx le_sup_left]
exact Submodule.mem_sup_right <| mem_span_singleton_self x
have : IsPrime m :=
⟨by rintro rfl; rw [radical_top] at hrm; exact hrm trivial, fun {x y} hxym =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hym =>
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm
let ⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn
let ⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym
let ⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk
let ⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg
hrm
⟨n + k, by
rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c * x),
mul_assoc c x (d * y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc]
refine
m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm)
(m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm) (m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩
hrm <|
this.radical.symm ▸ (sInf_le ⟨hIm, this⟩ : sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } ≤ m) hr
theorem isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
(⊥ : Ideal R).IsRadical := fun _ hx => hx.recOn fun _ hn => pow_eq_zero hn
@[simp]
theorem radical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
radical (⊥ : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors
instance : IdemCommSemiring (Ideal R) :=
inferInstance
variable (R) in
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
Nat.recOn n one_eq_top fun n ih => by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
theorem natCast_eq_top {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
natCast_eq_one hn |>.trans one_eq_top
/-- `3 : Ideal R` is *not* the ideal generated by 3 (which would be spelt
`Ideal.span {3}`), it is simply `1 + 1 + 1 = ⊤`. -/
theorem ofNat_eq_top {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
ofNat_eq_one.trans one_eq_top
variable (I)
lemma radical_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → radical (I ^ n) = radical I
| 1, _ => by simp
| n + 2, _ => by rw [pow_succ, radical_mul, radical_pow n.succ_ne_zero, inf_idem]
|
theorem IsPrime.mul_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P := by
rw [or_comm, Ideal.mul_le]
simp_rw [hp.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem, SetLike.le_def, ← forall_or_left, or_comm, forall_or_left]
theorem IsPrime.inf_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨fun h ↦ hp.mul_le.1 <| mul_le_inf.trans h, fun h ↦ h.elim inf_le_left.trans inf_le_right.trans⟩
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_le {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P :=
s.induction_on (by simp [hp.ne_top]) fun I s ih ↦ by simp [hp.mul_le, ih]
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_map_le {s : Multiset ι} (f : ι → Ideal R) {P : Ideal R}
(hp : IsPrime P) : (s.map f).prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P := by
simp_rw [hp.multiset_prod_le, Multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 887 | 901 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
theorem arccos_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arccos x = 0 := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_one_le hx, sub_self]
theorem arccos_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arccos x = π := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx, sub_neg_eq_add, add_halves]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem sin_arccos (x : ℝ) : sin (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arccos_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, sin_pi, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arccos_of_one_le hx₂.le, sin_zero, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
rw [arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_arcsin]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arccos x < π / 2 ↔ 0 < x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_four {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 4 ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [arccos, ← pi_div_four_le_arcsin]
constructor <;>
· intro
linarith
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arccos : Continuous arccos :=
continuous_const.sub continuous_arcsin
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arccos (x : ℝ) : tan (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) / x := by
rw [arccos, tan_pi_div_two_sub, tan_arcsin, inv_div]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arccos_eq_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arccos x = arcsin (√(1 - x ^ 2)) :=
(arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arccos _)
⟨(Left.neg_nonpos_iff.2 (div_nonneg pi_pos.le (by norm_num))).trans (arccos_nonneg _),
arccos_le_pi_div_two.2 h⟩).symm
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arcsin_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arcsin x = arccos (√(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw [eq_comm, ← cos_arcsin]
exact
arccos_cos (arcsin_nonneg.2 h)
((arcsin_le_pi_div_two _).trans (div_le_self pi_pos.le one_le_two))
end Real
open Real
/-!
### Convenience dot notation lemmas
-/
namespace Filter.Tendsto
variable {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ} {f : α → ℝ}
protected theorem arcsin (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arcsin x)) :=
(continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).comp h
theorem arcsin_nhdsLE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≤] x)) :
Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≤] (arcsin x)) := by
refine ((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun y hy ↦ ?_).comp h
exact monotone_arcsin hy
theorem arcsin_nhdsGE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≥] x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≥] (arcsin x)) :=
((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun _ ↦ arcsin_le_arcsin).comp h
protected theorem arccos (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arccos x)) :=
(continuous_arccos.tendsto _).comp h
theorem arccos_nhdsLE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≤] x)) : Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝[≥] (arccos x)) :=
((continuous_arccos.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos).comp h
theorem arccos_nhdsGE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≥] x)) :
Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝[≤] (arccos x)) := by
refine ((continuous_arccos.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun y hy ↦ ?_).comp h
simp only [mem_Ici, mem_Iic] at hy ⊢
exact antitone_arccos hy
end Filter.Tendsto
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → ℝ} {s : Set X} {x : X}
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.arcsin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (arcsin <| f ·) s x :=
h.arcsin
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.arccos (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (arccos <| f ·) s x :=
h.arccos
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.arcsin (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (arcsin <| f ·) x :=
h.arcsin
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.arccos (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (arccos <| f ·) x :=
h.arccos
protected theorem ContinuousOn.arcsin (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (arcsin <| f ·) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).arcsin
protected theorem ContinuousOn.arccos (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (arccos <| f ·) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).arccos
| protected theorem Continuous.arcsin (h : Continuous f) : Continuous (arcsin <| f ·) :=
continuous_arcsin.comp h
protected theorem Continuous.arccos (h : Continuous f) : Continuous (arccos <| f ·) :=
continuous_arccos.comp h
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 469 | 473 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
/-!
# Nilpotent elements
This file develops the basic theory of nilpotent elements. In particular it shows that the
nilpotent elements are closed under many operations.
For the definition of `nilradical`, see `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas`.
## Main definitions
* `isNilpotent_neg_iff`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_add`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_sub`
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
variable {R S : Type*} {x y : R}
theorem IsNilpotent.neg [Ring R] (h : IsNilpotent x) : IsNilpotent (-x) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
use n
rw [neg_pow, hn, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem isNilpotent_neg_iff [Ring R] : IsNilpotent (-x) ↔ IsNilpotent x :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg x ▸ h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
lemma IsNilpotent.smul [MonoidWithZero R] [MonoidWithZero S] [MulActionWithZero R S]
[SMulCommClass R S S] [IsScalarTower R S S] {a : S} (ha : IsNilpotent a) (t : R) :
IsNilpotent (t • a) := by
obtain ⟨k, ha⟩ := ha
use k
rw [smul_pow, ha, smul_zero]
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_sub_one [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (r - 1) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨⟨r - 1, -∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, r ^ i, ?_, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
· simp [mul_geom_sum, hn]
· simp [geom_sum_mul, hn]
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_one_sub [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (1 - r) := by
rw [← IsUnit.neg_iff, neg_sub]
exact isUnit_sub_one hnil
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_one [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (r + 1) := by
rw [← IsUnit.neg_iff, neg_add']
exact isUnit_sub_one hnil.neg
|
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_one_add [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (1 + r) :=
add_comm r 1 ▸ isUnit_add_one hnil
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nilpotent/Basic.lean | 68 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
| induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 162 | 168 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jiale Miao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jiale Miao, Kevin Buzzard, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
/-!
# Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization
In this file we introduce Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization.
The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span.
## Main results
- `gramSchmidt` : the Gram-Schmidt process
- `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` :
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors.
- `span_gramSchmidt` :
`gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors.
- `gramSchmidt_ne_zero` :
If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero.
- `gramSchmidt_basis` :
The basis produced by the Gram-Schmidt process when given a basis as input.
- `gramSchmidtNormed` :
the normalized `gramSchmidt` (i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.)
- `gramSchmidt_orthonormal` :
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors.
- `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis`: orthonormal basis constructed by the Gram-Schmidt process from
an indexed set of vectors of the right size
-/
open Finset Submodule Module
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [WellFoundedLT ι]
attribute [local instance] IsWellOrder.toHasWellFounded
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidt [WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
f n - ∑ i : Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt f i).orthogonalProjection (f n)
termination_by n
decreasing_by exact mem_Iio.1 i.2
/-- This lemma uses `∑ i in` instead of `∑ i :`. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_def (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n = f n - ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [← sum_attach, attach_eq_univ, gramSchmidt]
theorem gramSchmidt_def' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, sub_add_cancel]
theorem gramSchmidt_def'' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n,
(⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i, f n⟫ / (‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i := by
convert gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f n
rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton, RCLike.ofReal_pow]
@[simp]
theorem gramSchmidt_zero {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrder ι] [OrderBot ι]
[WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f ⊥ = f ⊥ := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, Iio_eq_Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, sub_zero]
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation**:
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthogonal (f : ι → E) {a b : ι} (h₀ : a ≠ b) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := by
suffices ∀ a b : ι, a < b → ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 by
rcases h₀.lt_or_lt with ha | hb
· exact this _ _ ha
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact this _ _ hb
clear h₀ a b
intro a b h₀
revert a
apply wellFounded_lt.induction b
intro b ih a h₀
simp only [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f b, inner_sub_right, inner_sum, orthogonalProjection_singleton,
inner_smul_right]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem a (Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h₀)]
· by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a = 0
· simp only [h, inner_zero_left, zero_div, zero_mul, sub_zero]
· rw [RCLike.ofReal_pow, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, div_mul_cancel₀, sub_self]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
intro i hi hia
simp only [mul_eq_zero, div_eq_zero_iff, inner_self_eq_zero]
right
rcases hia.lt_or_lt with hia₁ | hia₂
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact ih a h₀ i hia₁
· exact ih i (mem_Iio.1 hi) a hia₂
/-- This is another version of `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` using `Pairwise` instead. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_pairwise_orthogonal (f : ι → E) :
Pairwise fun a b => ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
theorem gramSchmidt_inv_triangular (v : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 v j, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def'' 𝕜 v]
simp only [inner_add_right, inner_sum, inner_smul_right]
set b : ι → E := gramSchmidt 𝕜 v
convert zero_add (0 : 𝕜)
· exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v hij.ne'
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro k hki'
have hki : k < i := by simpa using hki'
have : ⟪b j, b k⟫ = 0 := gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v (hki.trans hij).ne'
simp [this]
open Submodule Set Order
theorem mem_span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hij)
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => smul_mem (span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j)) _ <|
subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) <| (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).le.trans hij)
theorem gramSchmidt_mem_span (f : ι → E) :
∀ {j i}, i ≤ j → gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) := by
intro j i hij
rw [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
refine Submodule.sub_mem _ (subset_span (mem_image_of_mem _ hij))
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_)
let hkj : k < j := (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).trans_le hij
exact smul_mem _ _
(span_mono (image_subset f <| Set.Iic_subset_Iic.2 hkj.le) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ le_rfl)
termination_by j => j
|
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iic (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iio (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iio c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/GramSchmidtOrtho.lean | 142 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FTaylorSeries
/-!
# Higher differentiability
A function is `C^1` on a domain if it is differentiable there, and its derivative is continuous.
By induction, it is `C^n` if it is `C^{n-1}` and its (n-1)-th derivative is `C^1` there or,
equivalently, if it is `C^1` and its derivative is `C^{n-1}`.
It is `C^∞` if it is `C^n` for all n.
Finally, it is `C^ω` if it is analytic (as well as all its derivative, which is automatic if the
space is complete).
We formalize these notions with predicates `ContDiffWithinAt`, `ContDiffAt`, `ContDiffOn` and
`ContDiff` saying that the function is `C^n` within a set at a point, at a point, on a set
and on the whole space respectively.
To avoid the issue of choice when choosing a derivative in sets where the derivative is not
necessarily unique, `ContDiffOn` is not defined directly in terms of the
regularity of the specific choice `iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s` inside `s`, but in terms of the
existence of a nice sequence of derivatives, expressed with a predicate
`HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn` defined in the file `FTaylorSeries`.
We prove basic properties of these notions.
## Main definitions and results
Let `f : E → F` be a map between normed vector spaces over a nontrivially normed field `𝕜`.
* `ContDiff 𝕜 n f`: expresses that `f` is `C^n`, i.e., it admits a Taylor series up to
rank `n`.
* `ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` in `s`.
* `ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x`.
* `ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x` within the set `s`.
In sets of unique differentiability, `ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s` can be expressed in terms of the
properties of `iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s` for `m ≤ n`. In the whole space,
`ContDiff 𝕜 n f` can be expressed in terms of the properties of `iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 m f`
for `m ≤ n`.
## Implementation notes
The definitions in this file are designed to work on any field `𝕜`. They are sometimes slightly more
complicated than the naive definitions one would guess from the intuition over the real or complex
numbers, but they are designed to circumvent the lack of gluing properties and partitions of unity
in general. In the usual situations, they coincide with the usual definitions.
### Definition of `C^n` functions in domains
One could define `C^n` functions in a domain `s` by fixing an arbitrary choice of derivatives (this
is what we do with `iteratedFDerivWithin`) and requiring that all these derivatives up to `n` are
continuous. If the derivative is not unique, this could lead to strange behavior like two `C^n`
functions `f` and `g` on `s` whose sum is not `C^n`. A better definition is thus to say that a
function is `C^n` inside `s` if it admits a sequence of derivatives up to `n` inside `s`.
This definition still has the problem that a function which is locally `C^n` would not need to
be `C^n`, as different choices of sequences of derivatives around different points might possibly
not be glued together to give a globally defined sequence of derivatives. (Note that this issue
can not happen over reals, thanks to partition of unity, but the behavior over a general field is
not so clear, and we want a definition for general fields). Also, there are locality
problems for the order parameter: one could image a function which, for each `n`, has a nice
sequence of derivatives up to order `n`, but they do not coincide for varying `n` and can therefore
not be glued to give rise to an infinite sequence of derivatives. This would give a function
which is `C^n` for all `n`, but not `C^∞`. We solve this issue by putting locality conditions
in space and order in our definition of `ContDiffWithinAt` and `ContDiffOn`.
The resulting definition is slightly more complicated to work with (in fact not so much), but it
gives rise to completely satisfactory theorems.
For instance, with this definition, a real function which is `C^m` (but not better) on `(-1/m, 1/m)`
for each natural `m` is by definition `C^∞` at `0`.
There is another issue with the definition of `ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x`. We can
require the existence and good behavior of derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x`
within `s`. However, this does not imply continuity or differentiability within `s` of the function
at `x` when `x` does not belong to `s`. Therefore, we require such existence and good behavior on
a neighborhood of `x` within `s ∪ {x}` (which appears as `insert x s` in this file).
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞`, and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`. To
avoid ambiguities with the two tops, the theorems name use either `infty` or `omega`.
These notations are scoped in `ContDiff`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped NNReal Topology ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG uX
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {X : Type uX} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X]
{s s₁ t u : Set E} {f f₁ : E → F} {g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {c : F} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set around a point -/
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to order `n` within a set `s` at a point `x` if
it admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` in a neighborhood of `x` in `s ∪ {x}`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
For `n = ω`, we require the function to be analytic within `s` at `x`. The precise definition we
give (all the derivatives should be analytic) is more involved to work around issues when the space
is not complete, but it is equivalent when the space is complete.
For instance, a real function which is `C^m` on `(-1/m, 1/m)` for each natural `m`, but not
better, is `C^∞` at `0` within `univ`.
-/
def ContDiffWithinAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop :=
match n with
| ω => ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω f p u ∧ ∀ i, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x i) u
| (n : ℕ∞) => ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn m f p u
lemma HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.analyticOn
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω f p s) (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x 0) s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s := by
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F) (p x 0)) s :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _ ).comp_analyticOn
h (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact this.congr (fun y hy ↦ (hf.zero_eq _ hy).symm)
lemma ContDiffWithinAt.analyticOn (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, hu, hp.analyticOn (h'p 0)⟩
lemma ContDiffWithinAt.analyticWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
obtain ⟨u, hu, hf⟩ := h.analyticOn
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (by simp) hu
exact (hf x xu).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) hu)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_omega_iff_analyticWithinAt [CompleteSpace F] :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x ↔ AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.analyticWithinAt, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h.exists_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω
exact ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le le_top, fun i ↦ h'p i⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_nat {n : ℕ} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p u :=
⟨fun H => H n le_rfl, fun ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩ _m hm => ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le (mod_cast hm)⟩⟩
/-- When `n` is either a natural number or `ω`, one can characterize the property of being `C^n`
as the existence of a neighborhood on which there is a Taylor series up to order `n`,
requiring in addition that its terms are analytic in the `ω` case. -/
lemma contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p u ∧
(n = ω → ∀ i, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x i) u) := by
match n with
| ω => simp [ContDiffWithinAt]
| ∞ => simp at hn
| (n : ℕ) => simp [contDiffWithinAt_nat]
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.of_le (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m f s x := by
match n with
| ω => match m with
| ω => exact h
| (m : ℕ∞) =>
intro k _
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, -⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le le_top⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) => match m with
| ω => simp at hmn
| (m : ℕ∞) => exact fun k hk ↦ h k (le_trans hk (mod_cast hmn))
/-- In a complete space, a function which is analytic within a set at a point is also `C^ω` there.
Note that the same statement for `AnalyticOn` does not require completeness, see
`AnalyticOn.contDiffOn`. -/
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.contDiffWithinAt [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_omega_iff_analyticWithinAt.2 h).of_le le_top
theorem contDiffWithinAt_iff_forall_nat_le {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m f s x :=
⟨fun H _ hm => H.of_le (mod_cast hm), fun H m hm => H m hm _ le_rfl⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_infty :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ∞ f s x ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_iff_forall_nat_le.trans <| by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, le_top]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-25")] alias contDiffWithinAt_top := contDiffWithinAt_infty
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
have := h.of_le (zero_le _)
simp only [ContDiffWithinAt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero,
mem_pure, forall_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero] at this
rcases this with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
rw [mem_nhdsWithin_insert] at hu
exact (H.continuousOn.continuousWithinAt hu.1).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hu.2
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, H, H'⟩ := h
exact ⟨{x ∈ u | f₁ x = f x}, Filter.inter_mem hu (mem_nhdsWithin_insert.2 ⟨hx, h₁⟩), p,
(H.mono (sep_subset _ _)).congr fun _ ↦ And.right,
fun i ↦ (H' i).mono (sep_subset _ _)⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
let ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩ := h m hm
exact ⟨{ x ∈ u | f₁ x = f x }, Filter.inter_mem hu (mem_nhdsWithin_insert.2 ⟨hx, h₁⟩), p,
(H.mono (sep_subset _ _)).congr fun _ ↦ And.right⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁.symm hx.symm, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono x (subset_insert x s) h₁)
(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt_of_insert (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h₁.symm, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h₁⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ <| h₁.self_of_nhdsWithin hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt_of_mem (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s):
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁.symm hx, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h₁) hx
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr (fun x hx ↦ (h₁ x hx).symm) hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ _ hx)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, f₁ y = f y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_of_insert (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, f₁ y = f y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, H, H'⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert hst) hu, p, H, H'⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases h m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
exact ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert hst) hu, p, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.mono (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_mono
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h' : EqOn f₁ f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s₁ x :=
(h.mono h₁).congr h' hx
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_set (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
apply h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-23")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.congr_nhds := ContDiffWithinAt.congr_set
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_set {t : Set E} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_set hst, fun h => h.congr_set hst.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-23")]
alias contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds := contDiffWithinAt_congr_set
theorem contDiffWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr_set (mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.1 h).symm
theorem contDiffWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_inter' (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_insert_self :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert x s) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
match n with
| ω => simp [ContDiffWithinAt]
| (n : ℕ∞) => simp_rw [ContDiffWithinAt, insert_idem]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert y s) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hx)
· exact contDiffWithinAt_insert_self
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert _ _), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
apply h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
simp [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne hx, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨ContDiffWithinAt.of_insert, ContDiffWithinAt.insert'⟩ := contDiffWithinAt_insert
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
theorem contDiffWithinAt_diff_singleton {y : E} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s \ {y}) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, contDiffWithinAt_insert]
/-- If a function is `C^n` within a set at a point, with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable
within this set at this point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt' (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x := by
rcases contDiffWithinAt_nat.1 (h.of_le hn) with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨t, t_open, xt, tu⟩
rw [inter_comm] at tu
exact (differentiableWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds t_open xt)).1 <|
((H.mono tu).differentiableOn le_rfl) x ⟨mem_insert x s, xt⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.differentiableWithinAt' hn).mono (subset_insert x s)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`
(and moreover the function is analytic when `n = ω`). -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧
∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) u x) ∧ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f' u x := by
have h'n : n + 1 ≠ ∞ := by simpa using hn
constructor
· intro h
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty h'n).1 h with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp, H'p⟩
refine ⟨u, hu, ?_, fun y => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F) (p y 1),
fun y hy => Hp.hasFDerivWithinAt le_add_self hy, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact Hp.analyticOn (H'p rfl 0)
apply (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty hn).2
refine ⟨u, ?_, fun y : E => (p y).shift, ?_⟩
· convert @self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ x u
have : x ∈ insert x s := by simp
exact insert_eq_of_mem (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin this hu)
· rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_succ_iff_right] at Hp
refine ⟨Hp.2.2, ?_⟩
rintro rfl i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryRightEquiv' 𝕜 i E F) (p x (i + 1))) u
apply (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _).comp_analyticOn
?_ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact H'p rfl _
· rintro ⟨u, hu, hf, f', f'_eq_deriv, Hf'⟩
rw [contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty h'n]
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty hn).1 Hf' with ⟨v, hv, p', Hp', p'_an⟩
refine ⟨v ∩ u, ?_, fun x => (p' x).unshift (f x), ?_, ?_⟩
· apply Filter.inter_mem _ hu
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hu
exact nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x u) hv
· rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_succ_iff_right]
refine ⟨fun y _ => rfl, fun y hy => ?_, ?_⟩
· change
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun z => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f z))
(FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift (p' y) (f y) 1).curryLeft (v ∩ u) y
rw [← Function.comp_def _ f, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
convert (f'_eq_deriv y hy.2).mono inter_subset_right
rw [← Hp'.zero_eq y hy.1]
ext z
change ((p' y 0) (init (@cons 0 (fun _ => E) z 0))) (@cons 0 (fun _ => E) z 0 (last 0)) =
((p' y 0) 0) z
congr
norm_num [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· convert (Hp'.mono inter_subset_left).congr fun x hx => Hp'.zero_eq x hx.1 using 1
· ext x y
change p' x 0 (init (@snoc 0 (fun _ : Fin 1 => E) 0 y)) y = p' x 0 0 y
rw [init_snoc]
· ext x k v y
change p' x k (init (@snoc k (fun _ : Fin k.succ => E) v y))
(@snoc k (fun _ : Fin k.succ => E) v y (last k)) = p' x k v y
rw [snoc_last, init_snoc]
· intro h i
simp only [WithTop.add_eq_top, WithTop.one_ne_top, or_false] at h
match i with
| 0 =>
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift]
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ ((hf h).mono inter_subset_right)
(Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _
| i + 1 =>
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ ((p'_an h i).mono inter_subset_left)
(Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _
/-- A version of `contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt` where all derivatives
are taken within the same set. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt' (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x ↔
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ⊆ insert x s ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧
∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) ∧ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨u, hu, f_an, f', huf', hf'⟩ := (contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn).mp hf
obtain ⟨w, hw, hxw, hwu⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp hu
rw [inter_comm] at hwu
refine ⟨insert x s ∩ w, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (hw.mem_nhds hxw), inter_subset_left, ?_, f',
fun y hy => ?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
apply (f_an h).mono hwu
· refine ((huf' y <| hwu hy).mono hwu).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_insert _ _))
exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (hw.mem_nhds hy.2)
· exact hf'.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) hu)
· rw [← contDiffWithinAt_insert, contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn,
insert_eq_of_mem (mem_insert _ _)]
rintro ⟨u, hu, hus, f_an, f', huf', hf'⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, f_an, f', fun y hy => (huf' y hy).insert'.mono hus, hf'.insert.mono hus⟩
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set -/
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` on `s` if, for any point `x` in `s`, it
admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x` in `s`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
-/
def ContDiffOn (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : E → F) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.contDiffOn {n : ℕ∞} {f' : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f f' s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x hx m hm
use s
simp only [Set.insert_eq_of_mem hx, self_mem_nhdsWithin, true_and]
exact ⟨f', hf.of_le (mod_cast hm)⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.contDiffWithinAt (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
h x hx
theorem ContDiffOn.of_le (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : m ≤ n) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).of_le hmn
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.contDiffOn' (hm : m ≤ n) (h' : m = ∞ → n = ω)
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f (insert x s ∩ u) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n ω with rfl | hn
· obtain ⟨t, ht, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, huo, hxu, hut⟩
rw [inter_comm] at hut
refine ⟨u, huo, hxu, ?_⟩
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f (insert x s ∩ u) from this.of_le le_top
intro y hy
refine ⟨insert x s ∩ u, ?_, p, hp.mono hut, fun i ↦ (h'p i).mono hut⟩
simp only [insert_eq_of_mem, hy, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
· match m with
| ω => simp [hn] at hm
| ∞ => exact (hn (h' rfl)).elim
| (m : ℕ) =>
rcases contDiffWithinAt_nat.1 (h.of_le hm) with ⟨t, ht, p, hp⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, huo, hxu, hut⟩
rw [inter_comm] at hut
exact ⟨u, huo, hxu, (hp.mono hut).contDiffOn⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.contDiffOn (hm : m ≤ n) (h' : m = ∞ → n = ω)
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ⊆ insert x s ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f u := by
obtain ⟨_u, uo, xu, h⟩ := h.contDiffOn' hm h'
exact ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (uo.mem_nhds xu), inter_subset_left, h⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.analyticOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).analyticWithinAt
/-- A function is `C^n` within a set at a point, for `n : ℕ`, if and only if it is `C^n` on
a neighborhood of this point. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_iff_contDiffOn_nhds (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f u := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases h.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨u, hu, h'u⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, h'u.2⟩
· rcases h with ⟨u, u_mem, hu⟩
have : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) u_mem
exact (hu x this).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x s) u_mem)
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.eventually (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[insert x s] x, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s y := by
rcases h.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨u, hu, _, hd⟩
have : ∀ᶠ y : E in 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] y ∧ y ∈ u :=
(eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin.2 hu).and hu
refine this.mono fun y hy => (hd y hy.2).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact nhdsWithin_mono y (subset_insert _ _) hy.1
theorem ContDiffOn.of_succ (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
h.of_le le_self_add
theorem ContDiffOn.one_of_succ (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 1 f s :=
h.of_le le_add_self
theorem contDiffOn_iff_forall_nat_le {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f s :=
⟨fun H _ hm => H.of_le (mod_cast hm), fun H x hx m hm => H m hm x hx m le_rfl⟩
theorem contDiffOn_infty : ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
contDiffOn_iff_forall_nat_le.trans <| by simp only [le_top, forall_prop_of_true]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")] alias contDiffOn_top := contDiffOn_infty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_infty_iff_contDiffOn_omega := contDiffOn_infty
theorem contDiffOn_all_iff_nat :
(∀ (n : ℕ∞), ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
refine ⟨fun H n => H n, ?_⟩
rintro H (_ | n)
exacts [contDiffOn_infty.2 H, H n]
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem ContDiffOn.congr (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s := fun x hx => (h x hx).congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem contDiffOn_congr (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨fun H => H.congr fun x hx => (h₁ x hx).symm, fun H => H.congr h₁⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.mono (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) {t : Set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t :=
fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem ContDiffOn.congr_mono (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f₁ x = f x) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).congr h₁
/-- If a function is `C^n` on a set with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable there. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).differentiableWithinAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` around each point in a set, then it is `C^n` on the set. -/
theorem contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u)) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩
apply (contDiffWithinAt_inter _).1 (hu x ⟨xs, xu⟩)
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds u_open xu
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧ ∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) u x) ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f' u := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn).1 (h x hx) with
⟨u, hu, f_an, f', hf', Hf'⟩
rcases Hf'.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨v, vu, v'u, hv⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hu ⊢
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx hu
rw [insert_eq_of_mem xu] at vu v'u
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hu vu, fun h ↦ (f_an h).mono v'u, f',
fun y hy ↦ (hf' y (v'u hy)).mono v'u, hv⟩
· intro h x hx
rw [contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn]
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_nhbd, f_an, f', hu, hf'⟩
have : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) u_nhbd
exact ⟨u, u_nhbd, f_an, f', hu, hf' x this⟩
/-! ### Iterated derivative within a set -/
@[simp]
theorem contDiffOn_zero : ContDiffOn 𝕜 0 f s ↔ ContinuousOn f s := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.continuousOn, fun H => fun x hx m hm ↦ ?_⟩
have : (m : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 := le_antisymm (mod_cast hm) bot_le
rw [this]
refine ⟨insert x s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_⟩
rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_zero_iff]
exact ⟨by rwa [insert_eq_of_mem hx], fun x _ => by simp [ftaylorSeriesWithin]⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_zero (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 0 f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ContinuousOn f (s ∩ u) := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩ := h 0 le_rfl
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa [hx] using H
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_zero_iff] at hp
exact hp.1.mono inter_subset_right
· rintro ⟨u, H, hu⟩
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_inter' H]
have h' : x ∈ s ∩ u := ⟨hx, mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx H⟩
exact (contDiffOn_zero.mpr hu).contDiffWithinAt h'
/-- When a function is `C^n` in a set `s` of unique differentiability, it admits
`ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s` as a Taylor series up to order `n` in `s`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffOn.ftaylorSeriesWithin
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) s := by
constructor
· intro x _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro m hm x hx
have : (m + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n := ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hm
rcases (h x hx).of_le this _ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hu
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩
rw [inter_comm] at ho
have : p x m.succ = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x m.succ := by
change p x m.succ = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m.succ f s x
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open xo]
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter o_open) ⟨hx, xo⟩
rw [← this, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds o_open xo)]
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s y m := by
rintro y ⟨hy, yo⟩
change p y m = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s y
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open yo]
exact
(Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn (mod_cast Nat.le_succ m)
(hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩
exact
((Hp.mono ho).fderivWithin m (mod_cast lt_add_one m) x ⟨hx, xo⟩).congr
(fun y hy => (A y hy).symm) (A x ⟨hx, xo⟩).symm
· intro m hm
apply continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
intro x hx
rcases (h x hx).of_le hm _ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at ho
rw [inter_comm] at ho
refine ⟨o, o_open, xo, ?_⟩
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s y m := by
rintro y ⟨hy, yo⟩
change p y m = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s y
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open yo]
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩
exact ((Hp.mono ho).cont m le_rfl).congr fun y hy => (A y hy).symm
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_subset {n : ℕ} (st : s ⊆ t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f t x :=
(((h.ftaylorSeriesWithin ht).mono st).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl hs hx).symm
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {a : E}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s a) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (ha : a ∈ s) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≤ n) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝[s] a).smallSets, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn m f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) t := by
rcases h.contDiffOn' hm (by simp) with ⟨U, hUo, haU, hfU⟩
have : ∀ᶠ t in (𝓝[s] a).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∩ U := by
rw [eventually_smallSets_subset]
exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ <| hUo.mem_nhds haU
refine this.mono fun t ht ↦ .mono ?_ ht
rw [insert_eq_of_mem ha] at hfU
refine (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hUo)).congr_series fun k hk x hx ↦ ?_
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hUo hx.2
/-- On a set with unique differentiability, an analytic function is automatically `C^ω`, as its
successive derivatives are also analytic. This does not require completeness of the space. See
also `AnalyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace`. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.contDiffOn (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s from this.of_le le_top
rcases h.exists_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn hs with ⟨p, hp⟩
intro x hx
refine ⟨s, ?_, p, hp⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact self_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- On a set with unique differentiability, an analytic function is automatically `C^ω`, as its
successive derivatives are also analytic. This does not require completeness of the space. See
also `AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace`. -/
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn (h : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := h.analyticOn.contDiffOn hs
/-- An analytic function is automatically `C^ω` in a complete space -/
theorem AnalyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).contDiffWithinAt
/-- An analytic function is automatically `C^ω` in a complete space -/
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
h.analyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace
theorem contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn {n : ℕ∞}
(Hcont : ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ m : ℕ, m < n →
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x hx m hm
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
refine ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro y _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro k hk y hy
convert (Hdiff k (lt_of_lt_of_le (mod_cast hk) (mod_cast hm)) y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt
· intro k hk
exact Hcont k (le_trans (mod_cast hk) (mod_cast hm))
theorem contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn (fun m hm => (h m hm).continuousOn) fun m hm =>
h m (le_of_lt hm)
theorem contDiffOn_of_analyticOn_iteratedFDerivWithin
(h : ∀ m, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s from this.of_le le_top
intro x hx
refine ⟨insert x s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
constructor
· intro y _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
| iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro k _ y hy
exact ((h k).differentiableOn y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt
· intro k _
exact (h k).continuousOn
· intro i
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact h i
theorem contDiffOn_omega_iff_analyticOn (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h m ↦ h.analyticOn m, fun h ↦ h.contDiffOn hs⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m ≤ n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) : ContinuousOn (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s :=
((h.of_le hmn).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).cont m le_rfl
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s := by
intro x hx
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Defs.lean | 745 | 765 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
/-!
# UV-compressions
This file defines UV-compression. It is an operation on a set family that reduces its shadow.
UV-compressing `a : α` along `u v : α` means replacing `a` by `(a ⊔ u) \ v` if `a` and `u` are
disjoint and `v ≤ a`. In some sense, it's moving `a` from `v` to `u`.
UV-compressions are immensely useful to prove the Kruskal-Katona theorem. The idea is that
compressing a set family might decrease the size of its shadow, so iterated compressions hopefully
minimise the shadow.
## Main declarations
* `UV.compress`: `compress u v a` is `a` compressed along `u` and `v`.
* `UV.compression`: `compression u v s` is the compression of the set family `s` along `u` and `v`.
It is the compressions of the elements of `s` whose compression is not already in `s` along with
the element whose compression is already in `s`. This way of splitting into what moves and what
does not ensures the compression doesn't squash the set family, which is proved by
`UV.card_compression`.
* `UV.card_shadow_compression_le`: Compressing reduces the size of the shadow. This is a key fact in
the proof of Kruskal-Katona.
## Notation
`𝓒` (typed with `\MCC`) is notation for `UV.compression` in locale `FinsetFamily`.
## Notes
Even though our emphasis is on `Finset α`, we define UV-compressions more generally in a generalized
boolean algebra, so that one can use it for `Set α`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, UV-compression, shadow
-/
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- UV-compression is injective on the elements it moves. See `UV.compress`. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
/-! ### UV-compression in generalized boolean algebras -/
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableLE α] {s : Finset α} {u v a : α}
/-- UV-compressing `a` means removing `v` from it and adding `u` if `a` and `u` are disjoint and
`v ≤ a` (it replaces the `v` part of `a` by the `u` part). Else, UV-compressing `a` doesn't do
anything. This is most useful when `u` and `v` are disjoint finsets of the same size. -/
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
/-- An element can be compressed to any other element by removing/adding the differences. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
/-- Compressing an element is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_right.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- To UV-compress a set family, we compress each of its elements, except that we don't want to
reduce the cardinality, so we keep all elements whose compression is already present. -/
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} ∪ {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
/-- `IsCompressed u v s` expresses that `s` is UV-compressed. -/
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
/-- UV-compression is injective on the sets that are not UV-compressed. -/
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∉ s} := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
/-- `a` is in the UV-compressed family iff it's in the original and its compression is in the
original, or it's not in the original but it's the compression of something in the original. -/
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
@[simp]
theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
· refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
exact hb' hb
/-- Any family is compressed along two identical elements. -/
theorem isCompressed_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : IsCompressed u u s := compression_self u s
theorem compress_disjoint :
Disjoint {a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s} :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha₁ ha₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 ha₂).2 (mem_filter.1 ha₁).1
theorem compress_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ s) : compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression]
by_cases h : compress u v a ∈ s
· rw [compress_idem]
exact Or.inl ⟨h, h⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨h, a, ha, rfl⟩
-- This is a special case of `compress_mem_compression` once we have `compression_idem`.
theorem compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) :
compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression] at ha ⊢
simp only [compress_idem, exists_prop]
obtain ⟨_, ha⟩ | ⟨_, b, hb, rfl⟩ := ha
· exact Or.inl ⟨ha, ha⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [compress_idem], b, hb, (compress_idem _ _ _).symm⟩
/-- Compressing a family is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compression_idem (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u v (𝓒 u v s) = 𝓒 u v s := by
have h : {a ∈ 𝓒 u v s | compress u v a ∉ 𝓒 u v s} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun a ha h ↦ h <| compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression ha
rw [compression, filter_image, h, image_empty, ← h]
exact filter_union_filter_neg_eq _ (compression u v s)
/-- Compressing a family doesn't change its size. -/
@[simp]
| theorem card_compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : #(𝓒 u v s) = #s := by
rw [compression, card_union_of_disjoint compress_disjoint, filter_image,
card_image_of_injOn compress_injOn, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s _ _),
filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
theorem le_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) : u ≤ a := by
rw [mem_compression] at h
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 194 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Spectrum.Basic
/-!
# Unitary elements of a star monoid
This file defines `unitary R`, where `R` is a star monoid, as the submonoid made of the elements
that satisfy `star U * U = 1` and `U * star U = 1`, and these form a group.
This includes, for instance, unitary operators on Hilbert spaces.
See also `Matrix.UnitaryGroup` for specializations to `unitary (Matrix n n R)`.
## Tags
unitary
-/
/-- In a *-monoid, `unitary R` is the submonoid consisting of all the elements `U` of
`R` such that `star U * U = 1` and `U * star U = 1`.
-/
def unitary (R : Type*) [Monoid R] [StarMul R] : Submonoid R where
carrier := { U | star U * U = 1 ∧ U * star U = 1 }
one_mem' := by simp only [mul_one, and_self_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, star_one]
mul_mem' := @fun U B ⟨hA₁, hA₂⟩ ⟨hB₁, hB₂⟩ => by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· calc
star (U * B) * (U * B) = star B * star U * U * B := by simp only [mul_assoc, star_mul]
_ = star B * (star U * U) * B := by rw [← mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by rw [hA₁, mul_one, hB₁]
· calc
U * B * star (U * B) = U * B * (star B * star U) := by rw [star_mul]
_ = U * (B * star B) * star U := by simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by rw [hB₂, mul_one, hA₂]
variable {R : Type*}
namespace unitary
section Monoid
variable [Monoid R] [StarMul R]
theorem mem_iff {U : R} : U ∈ unitary R ↔ star U * U = 1 ∧ U * star U = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_mul_self_of_mem {U : R} (hU : U ∈ unitary R) : star U * U = 1 :=
hU.1
@[simp]
theorem mul_star_self_of_mem {U : R} (hU : U ∈ unitary R) : U * star U = 1 :=
hU.2
theorem star_mem {U : R} (hU : U ∈ unitary R) : star U ∈ unitary R :=
⟨by rw [star_star, mul_star_self_of_mem hU], by rw [star_star, star_mul_self_of_mem hU]⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mem_iff {U : R} : star U ∈ unitary R ↔ U ∈ unitary R :=
⟨fun h => star_star U ▸ star_mem h, star_mem⟩
instance : Star (unitary R) :=
⟨fun U => ⟨star U, star_mem U.prop⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_star {U : unitary R} : ↑(star U) = (star U : R) :=
rfl
theorem coe_star_mul_self (U : unitary R) : (star U : R) * U = 1 :=
star_mul_self_of_mem U.prop
theorem coe_mul_star_self (U : unitary R) : (U : R) * star U = 1 :=
mul_star_self_of_mem U.prop
@[simp]
theorem star_mul_self (U : unitary R) : star U * U = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_star_mul_self U
@[simp]
theorem mul_star_self (U : unitary R) : U * star U = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_mul_star_self U
instance : Group (unitary R) :=
{ Submonoid.toMonoid _ with
inv := star
inv_mul_cancel := star_mul_self }
instance : InvolutiveStar (unitary R) :=
⟨by
intro x
ext
rw [coe_star, coe_star, star_star]⟩
instance : StarMul (unitary R) :=
⟨by
intro x y
ext
rw [coe_star, Submonoid.coe_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, coe_star, coe_star, star_mul]⟩
instance : Inhabited (unitary R) :=
⟨1⟩
theorem star_eq_inv (U : unitary R) : star U = U⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem star_eq_inv' : (star : unitary R → unitary R) = Inv.inv :=
rfl
/-- The unitary elements embed into the units. -/
@[simps]
def toUnits : unitary R →* Rˣ where
toFun x := ⟨x, ↑x⁻¹, coe_mul_star_self x, coe_star_mul_self x⟩
map_one' := Units.ext rfl
map_mul' _ _ := Units.ext rfl
theorem toUnits_injective : Function.Injective (toUnits : unitary R → Rˣ) := fun _ _ h =>
Subtype.ext <| Units.ext_iff.mp h
theorem _root_.IsUnit.mem_unitary_of_star_mul_self {u : R} (hu : IsUnit u)
(h_mul : star u * u = 1) : u ∈ unitary R := by
refine unitary.mem_iff.mpr ⟨h_mul, ?_⟩
lift u to Rˣ using hu
exact left_inv_eq_right_inv h_mul u.mul_inv ▸ u.mul_inv
theorem _root_.IsUnit.mem_unitary_of_mul_star_self {u : R} (hu : IsUnit u)
(h_mul : u * star u = 1) : u ∈ unitary R :=
star_star u ▸
(hu.star.mem_unitary_of_star_mul_self ((star_star u).symm ▸ h_mul) |> unitary.star_mem)
instance instIsStarNormal (u : unitary R) : IsStarNormal u where
star_comm_self := star_mul_self u |>.trans <| (mul_star_self u).symm
instance coe_isStarNormal (u : unitary R) : IsStarNormal (u : R) where
star_comm_self := congr(Subtype.val $(star_comm_self' u))
lemma _root_.isStarNormal_of_mem_unitary {u : R} (hu : u ∈ unitary R) : IsStarNormal u :=
coe_isStarNormal ⟨u, hu⟩
end Monoid
section Map
variable {F R S : Type*} [Monoid R] [StarMul R] [Monoid S] [StarMul S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [StarHomClass F R S] [MonoidHomClass F R S] (f : F)
lemma map_mem {r : R} (hr : r ∈ unitary R) : f r ∈ unitary S := by
rw [unitary.mem_iff] at hr
simpa [map_star, map_mul] using And.intro congr(f $(hr.1)) congr(f $(hr.2))
/-- The group homomorphism between unitary subgroups of star monoids induced by a star
homomorphism -/
@[simps]
def map : unitary R →* unitary S where
toFun := Subtype.map f (fun _ ↦ map_mem f)
map_one' := Subtype.ext <| map_one f
map_mul' _ _ := Subtype.ext <| map_mul f _ _
lemma toUnits_comp_map : toUnits.comp (map f) = (Units.map f).comp toUnits := by ext; rfl
end Map
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid R] [StarMul R]
instance : CommGroup (unitary R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Group (unitary R)), Submonoid.toCommMonoid _ with }
theorem mem_iff_star_mul_self {U : R} : U ∈ unitary R ↔ star U * U = 1 :=
mem_iff.trans <| and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => mul_comm (star U) U ▸ h
theorem mem_iff_self_mul_star {U : R} : U ∈ unitary R ↔ U * star U = 1 :=
mem_iff.trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => mul_comm U (star U) ▸ h
end CommMonoid
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero R] [StarMul R]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (U : unitary R) : ↑U⁻¹ = (U⁻¹ : R) :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right <| coe_mul_star_self _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (U₁ U₂ : unitary R) : ↑(U₁ / U₂) = (U₁ / U₂ : R) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_inv, Submonoid.coe_mul]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zpow (U : unitary R) (z : ℤ) : ↑(U ^ z) = (U : R) ^ z := by
cases z
· simp [SubmonoidClass.coe_pow]
· simp [coe_inv]
end GroupWithZero
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [StarRing R]
instance : Neg (unitary R) where
neg U :=
⟨-U, by simp [mem_iff, star_neg, neg_mul_neg]⟩
@[norm_cast]
| theorem coe_neg (U : unitary R) : ↑(-U) = (-U : R) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/Unitary.lean | 212 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Fin
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
/-!
### Locally finite order etc instances
-/
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder (n : ℕ) : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) where
finsetIcc a b := attachFin (Icc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIco a b := attachFin (Ico a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finsetIoc a b := attachFin (Ioc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIoo a b := attachFin (Ioo a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finset_mem_Icc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ico a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo a b := by simp
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n}
variable {m : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Icc :
attachFin (Icc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Icc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico :
attachFin (Ico a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ico a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioc :
attachFin (Ioc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Ioc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo :
attachFin (Ioo a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ioo a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_uIcc :
attachFin (uIcc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt (max a b).2) = uIcc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici : attachFin (Ico a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2) = Ici a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi : attachFin (Ioo a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2) = Ioi a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iic : attachFin (Iic a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iic.mp hx).trans_lt a.2) = Iic a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iio : attachFin (Iio a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iio.mp hx).trans a.2) = Iio a := by
ext; simp
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Icc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_uIcc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := Icc_eq_finset_subtype _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ici_eq_finset_subtype : Ici a = (Ico (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioi_eq_finset_subtype : Ioi a = (Ioo (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iic (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iic_eq_finset_subtype : Iic b = (Iic (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iio (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iio_eq_finset_subtype : Iio b = (Iio (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
end deprecated
section val
/-!
### Images under `Fin.val`
-/
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Icc : (Icc a b).image val = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ico : (Ico a b).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioc : (Ioc a b).image val = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioo : (Ioo a b).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_uIcc : (uIcc a b).image val = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
finsetImage_val_Icc _ _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ici : (Ici a).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioi : (Ioi a).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iic : (Iic a).image val = Iic (a : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iio : (Iio b).image val = Iio (b : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-!
### `Finset.map` along `Fin.valEmbedding`
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_uIcc : (uIcc a b).map valEmbedding = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_Icc _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")]
alias map_subtype_embedding_uIcc := map_valEmbedding_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ici : (Ici a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by
rw [← attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioi : (Ioi a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by
rw [← attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Iic : (Iic a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Iic (a : ℕ) := by
rw [← attachFin_Iic, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Iio : (Iio a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Iio (a : ℕ) := by
rw [← attachFin_Iio, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
end val
section castLE
/-!
### Image under `Fin.castLE`
-/
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_castLE_Icc (h : n ≤ m) :
(Icc a b).image (castLE h) = Icc (castLE h a) (castLE h b) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_castLE_Ico (h : n ≤ m) :
(Ico a b).image (castLE h) = Ico (castLE h a) (castLE h b) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_castLE_Ioc (h : n ≤ m) :
(Ioc a b).image (castLE h) = Ioc (castLE h a) (castLE h b) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_castLE_Ioo (h : n ≤ m) :
(Ioo a b).image (castLE h) = Ioo (castLE h a) (castLE h b) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_castLE_uIcc (h : n ≤ m) :
(uIcc a b).image (castLE h) = uIcc (castLE h a) (castLE h b) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
| theorem finsetImage_castLE_Iic (h : n ≤ m) :
(Iic a).image (castLE h) = Iic (castLE h a) := by simp [← coe_inj]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 241 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
| @[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 222 | 223 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Frédéric Marbach. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Marbach
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Derivation.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
/-!
# Adjoint action of a Lie algebra on itself
This file defines the *adjoint action* of a Lie algebra on itself, and establishes basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `LieDerivation.ad`: The adjoint action of a Lie algebra `L` on itself, seen as a morphism of Lie
algebras from `L` to the Lie algebra of its derivations. The adjoint action is also defined in the
`Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative.lean` file, under the name `LieAlgebra.ad`, as the morphism with
values in the endormophisms of `L`.
## Main statements
- `LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply`: when seen as endomorphisms, both definitions coincide,
- `LieDerivation.ad_ker_eq_center`: the kernel of the adjoint action is the center of `L`,
- `LieDerivation.lie_der_ad_eq_ad_der`: the commutator of a derivation `D` and `ad x` is `ad (D x)`,
- `LieDerivation.ad_isIdealMorphism`: the range of the adjoint action is an ideal of the
derivations.
-/
namespace LieDerivation
section AdjointAction
variable (R L : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
/-- The adjoint action of a Lie algebra `L` on itself, seen as a morphism of Lie algebras from
`L` to its derivations.
Note the minus sign: this is chosen to so that `ad ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅ad x, ad y⁆`. -/
@[simps!]
def ad : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ LieDerivation R L L :=
{ __ := - inner R L L
map_lie' := by
intro x y
ext z
simp only [AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, LinearMap.neg_apply, coe_neg,
Pi.neg_apply, inner_apply_apply, commutator_apply]
rw [leibniz_lie, neg_lie, neg_lie, ← lie_skew x]
abel }
variable {R L}
| /-- The definitions `LieDerivation.ad` and `LieAlgebra.ad` agree. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply (x : L) : ad R L x = LieAlgebra.ad R L x := by ext; simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Derivation/AdjointAction.lean | 53 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Shift
/-!
# Estimates for the complex logarithm
We show that `log (1+z)` differs from its Taylor polynomial up to degree `n` by at most
`‖z‖^(n+1)/((n+1)*(1-‖z‖))` when `‖z‖ < 1`; see `Complex.norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le`.
To this end, we derive the representation of `log (1+z)` as the integral of `1/(1+tz)`
over the unit interval (`Complex.log_eq_integral`) and introduce notation
`Complex.logTaylor n` for the Taylor polynomial up to degree `n-1`.
## TODO
Refactor using general Taylor series theory, once this exists in Mathlib.
-/
namespace Complex
/-!
### Integral representation of the complex log
-/
lemma continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ ↦ (1 + t • z)⁻¹) (Set.Icc 0 1) :=
ContinuousOn.inv₀ (by fun_prop)
(fun _ ht ↦ slitPlane_ne_zero <| StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)
open intervalIntegral in
/-- Represent `log (1 + z)` as an integral over the unit interval -/
lemma log_eq_integral {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
log (1 + z) = z * ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0 : ℝ)..1, (1 + t • z)⁻¹ := by
convert (integral_unitInterval_deriv_eq_sub (continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv hz)
(fun _ ht ↦ hasDerivAt_log <|
StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)).symm using 1
simp only [log_one, sub_zero]
/-- Represent `log (1 - z)⁻¹` as an integral over the unit interval -/
lemma log_inv_eq_integral {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 - z ∈ slitPlane) :
log (1 - z)⁻¹ = z * ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0 : ℝ)..1, (1 - t • z)⁻¹ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg 1 z] at hz ⊢
rw [log_inv _ <| slitPlane_arg_ne_pi hz, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_mul]
convert log_eq_integral hz using 5
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, smul_neg]
/-!
### The Taylor polynomials of the logarithm
-/
/-- The `n`th Taylor polynomial of `log` at `1`, as a function `ℂ → ℂ` -/
noncomputable
def logTaylor (n : ℕ) : ℂ → ℂ := fun z ↦ ∑ j ∈ Finset.range n, (-1) ^ (j + 1) * z ^ j / j
lemma logTaylor_zero : logTaylor 0 = fun _ ↦ 0 := by
funext
simp only [logTaylor, Finset.range_zero, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one, Finset.sum_empty]
lemma logTaylor_succ (n : ℕ) :
logTaylor (n + 1) = logTaylor n + (fun z : ℂ ↦ (-1) ^ (n + 1) * z ^ n / n) := by
funext
simpa only [logTaylor] using Finset.sum_range_succ ..
lemma logTaylor_at_zero (n : ℕ) : logTaylor n 0 = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [logTaylor_zero]
| succ n ih => simpa [logTaylor_succ, ih] using ne_or_eq n 0
lemma hasDerivAt_logTaylor (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) :
HasDerivAt (logTaylor (n + 1)) (∑ j ∈ Finset.range n, (-1) ^ j * z ^ j) z := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [logTaylor_succ, logTaylor_zero, Pi.add_def, hasDerivAt_const]
| succ n ih =>
rw [logTaylor_succ]
simp only [cpow_natCast, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd,
Finset.sum_range_succ, (show (-1) ^ (n + 1 + 1) = (-1) ^ n by ring)]
refine HasDerivAt.add ih ?_
simp only [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one, mul_div_assoc]
have : HasDerivAt (fun x : ℂ ↦ (x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))) (z ^ n) z := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
convert HasDerivAt.mul_const (hasDerivAt_pow (n + 1) z) (((n : ℂ) + 1)⁻¹) using 1
field_simp [Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero n]
convert HasDerivAt.const_mul _ this using 2
ring
/-!
### Bounds for the difference between log and its Taylor polynomials
-/
lemma hasDerivAt_log_sub_logTaylor (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun z : ℂ ↦ log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z) ((-z) ^ n * (1 + z)⁻¹) z := by
convert ((hasDerivAt_log hz).comp_const_add 1 z).sub (hasDerivAt_logTaylor n z) using 1
have hz' : -z ≠ 1 := by
intro H
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at H
simp only [H, add_neg_cancel] at hz
exact slitPlane_ne_zero hz rfl
simp_rw [← mul_pow, neg_one_mul, geom_sum_eq hz', ← neg_add', div_neg, add_comm z]
field_simp [slitPlane_ne_zero hz]
/-- Give a bound on `‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖` for `0 ≤ t ≤ 1` and `‖z‖ < 1`. -/
lemma norm_one_add_mul_inv_le {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Set.Icc 0 1) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ ≤ (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc] at ht
rw [norm_inv]
refine inv_anti₀ (by linarith) ?_
calc 1 - ‖z‖
_ ≤ 1 - t * ‖z‖ := by
nlinarith [norm_nonneg z]
_ = 1 - ‖t * z‖ := by
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg ht.1]
_ ≤ ‖1 + t * z‖ := by
rw [← norm_neg (t * z), ← sub_neg_eq_add]
convert norm_sub_norm_le 1 (-(t * z))
exact norm_one.symm
lemma integrable_pow_mul_norm_one_add_mul_inv (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun t : ℝ ↦ t ^ n * ‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖) MeasureTheory.volume 0 1 := by
have := continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv <| mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz
rw [← Set.uIcc_of_le zero_le_one] at this
exact ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable (by fun_prop)
open intervalIntegral in
| /-- The difference of `log (1+z)` and its `(n+1)`st Taylor polynomial can be bounded in
terms of `‖z‖`. -/
lemma norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ (n + 1) * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / (n + 1) := by
have help : IntervalIntegrable (fun t : ℝ ↦ t ^ n * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹) MeasureTheory.volume 0 1 :=
IntervalIntegrable.mul_const (Continuous.intervalIntegrable (by fun_prop) 0 1) (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹
let f (z : ℂ) : ℂ := log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z
let f' (z : ℂ) : ℂ := (-z) ^ n * (1 + z)⁻¹
have hderiv : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivAt f (f' (0 + t * z)) (0 + t * z) := by
intro t ht
rw [zero_add]
exact hasDerivAt_log_sub_logTaylor n <|
StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz) ht.1 ht.2
have hcont : ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ ↦ f' (0 + t * z)) (Set.Icc 0 1) := by
simp only [zero_add, zero_le_one, not_true_eq_false]
exact (Continuous.continuousOn (by fun_prop)).mul <|
continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv <| mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz
have H : f z = z * ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, (-(t * z)) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹ := by
convert (integral_unitInterval_deriv_eq_sub hcont hderiv).symm using 1
· simp only [f, zero_add, add_zero, log_one, logTaylor_at_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
· simp only [f', add_zero, log_one, logTaylor_at_zero, sub_self, real_smul, zero_add,
smul_eq_mul]
unfold f at H
simp only [H, norm_mul]
simp_rw [neg_pow (_ * z) n, mul_assoc, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, mul_pow,
mul_comm _ (z ^ n), mul_assoc, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, norm_mul, norm_pow,
norm_neg, norm_one, one_pow, one_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', mul_div_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg z) (n + 1))
calc ‖∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, (t : ℂ) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹‖
_ ≤ ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, ‖(t : ℂ) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ :=
intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm zero_le_one
_ = ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, t ^ n * ‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr <| fun t ht ↦ ?_
rw [Set.uIcc_of_le zero_le_one, Set.mem_Icc] at ht
simp_rw [norm_mul, norm_pow, Complex.norm_of_nonneg ht.1]
_ ≤ ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, t ^ n * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ :=
intervalIntegral.integral_mono_on zero_le_one
(integrable_pow_mul_norm_one_add_mul_inv n hz) help <|
fun t ht ↦ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_one_add_mul_inv_le ht hz)
(pow_nonneg ((Set.mem_Icc.mp ht).1) _)
_ = (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / (n + 1) := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_mul_const, mul_comm, integral_pow]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/LogBounds.lean | 131 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Damiano Testa, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Division
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Induction on polynomials
This file contains lemmas dealing with different flavours of induction on polynomials.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
/-- `divX p` returns a polynomial `q` such that `q * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p`.
It can be used in a semiring where the usual division algorithm is not possible -/
def divX (p : R[X]) : R[X] :=
⟨AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf p.toFinsupp 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_divX : (divX p).coeff n = p.coeff (n + 1) := by
rw [add_comm]; cases p; rfl
theorem divX_mul_X_add (p : R[X]) : divX p * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p :=
ext <| by rintro ⟨_ | _⟩ <;> simp [coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_divX_add (p : R[X]) : X * divX p + C (p.coeff 0) = p :=
ext <| by rintro ⟨_ | _⟩ <;> simp [coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem divX_C (a : R) : divX (C a) = 0 :=
ext fun n => by simp [coeff_divX, coeff_C, Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne _]
theorem divX_eq_zero_iff : divX p = 0 ↔ p = C (p.coeff 0) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [eq_comm, h] using divX_mul_X_add p, fun h => by rw [h, divX_C]⟩
theorem divX_add : divX (p + q) = divX p + divX q :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem divX_zero : divX (0 : R[X]) = 0 := leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp rfl
@[simp]
theorem divX_one : divX (1 : R[X]) = 0 := by
ext
simpa only [coeff_divX, coeff_zero] using coeff_one
@[simp]
theorem divX_C_mul : divX (C a * p) = C a * divX p := by
| ext
simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Inductions.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_self {x y : R} (h : ↑n ∣ x - y) :
↑n ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub h).mpr (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (p x : R) (n : ℕ) :
p ^ 2 ∣ (x + p) ^ n - x ^ (n - 1) * p * n - x ^ n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, sub_zero, sub_self, dvd_zero, mul_zero]
· simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, Nat.cast_succ, add_pow, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Nat.choose_self, Nat.succ_sub _, tsub_self, pow_one, Nat.choose_succ_self_right, pow_zero,
mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_left]
suffices p ^ 2 ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * p ^ (n + 1 - i) * ↑((n + 1).choose i) by
convert this; abel
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro y hy
calc
p ^ 2 ∣ p ^ (n + 1 - y) :=
pow_dvd_pow p (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (by linarith [Finset.mem_range.mp hy]))
_ ∣ x ^ y * p ^ (n + 1 - y) * ↑((n + 1).choose y) :=
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _) _
theorem not_dvd_geom_sum₂ {p : R} (hp : Prime p) (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
¬p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := fun h =>
hx <|
hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow <| (hp.dvd_or_dvd <| (dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' hxy).mp h).resolve_left hn
variable {p : ℕ} (a b)
theorem odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub (hp : Odd p) :
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + p * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) - p * a ^ (p - 1) := by
have h1 : ∀ (i : ℕ),
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * i + a ^ i) := by
intro i
calc
↑p ^ 2 ∣ (↑p * b) ^ 2 := by simp only [mul_pow, dvd_mul_right]
_ ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) := by
simp only [sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (↑p * b) a i, ← sub_sub]
simp_rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at *
let s : R := (p : R)^2
calc
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (span {s})) (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + (p : R) * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range p,
mk (span {s}) ((a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [s, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, ← map_pow, h1, ← map_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x))) := by
ring_nf
simp_rw [← map_sum, sum_add_distrib, map_add]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ _x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 1)) := by
rw [add_right_inj]
have : ∀ (x : ℕ), (hx : x ∈ range p) → a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x)) = a ^ (p - 1) := by
intro x hx
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc _ x, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx)
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl this]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [add_right_inj, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s}) (↑p * b * ∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 2) * x) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_add]
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl]
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨x⟩) hx
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· have : x.succ - 1 + (p - 1 - x.succ) = p - 2 := by
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx))]
exact congr_arg Nat.pred (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left _ _)
rw [this]
ring1
_ = mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
have : Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : R)) =
((Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : ℕ)))) := by simp only [Nat.cast_sum]
simp only [add_eq_right, ← Finset.mul_sum, this]
norm_cast
simp only [Finset.sum_range_id]
norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_mul, map_mul,
Nat.mul_div_assoc p (even_iff_two_dvd.mp (Nat.Odd.sub_odd hp odd_one))]
ring_nf
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
refine Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr ?_
simp [s, mem_span_singleton]
section IntegralDomain
variable [IsDomain R]
theorem emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime {p : R} (hp : Prime p) {x y : R}
(hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
emultiplicity p (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity p (x - y) := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, emultiplicity_mul hp,
emultiplicity_eq_zero.2 (not_dvd_geom_sum₂ hp hxy hx hn), zero_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_sub_pow_of_prime := emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime
variable (hp : Prime (p : R)) (hp1 : Odd p) (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x)
include hp hp1 hxy hx
theorem emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one :
emultiplicity (↑p) (∑ i ∈ range p, x ^ i * y ^ (p - 1 - i)) = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one]
refine emultiplicity_eq_coe.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [pow_one]
exact dvd_geom_sum₂_self hxy
rw [dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub hxy] at hx
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hxy
rw [one_add_one_eq_two, eq_add_of_sub_eq' hk]
refine mt (dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub (@odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub _ _ y k _ hp1)).mp ?_
rw [pow_two, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hp.ne_zero]
exact mt hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.geom_sum₂_eq_one := emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one
theorem emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p - y ^ p) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + 1 := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, emultiplicity_mul hp, emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one hp hp1 hxy hx, add_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_prime_sub_pow_prime := emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime
theorem emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow (a : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p ^ a - y ^ p ^ a) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + a := by
induction a with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one]
| succ a h_ind =>
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← add_assoc, ← h_ind, pow_succ, pow_mul, pow_mul]
apply emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime hp hp1
· rw [← geom_sum₂_mul]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy _
· exact fun h => hx (hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow h)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow := emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow
end IntegralDomain
section LiftingTheExponent
variable (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hp1 : Odd p)
include hp hp1
/-- **Lifting the exponent lemma** for odd primes. -/
theorem Int.emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow {x y : ℤ} (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x) (n : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + emultiplicity p n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [emultiplicity_zero, add_top, pow_zero, sub_self]
have h : FiniteMultiplicity _ _ := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp.ne_one, n.succ_pos⟩
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at h
rcases emultiplicity_eq_coe.mp h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity with ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, hpn⟩
conv_lhs => rw [hk, pow_mul, pow_mul]
rw [Nat.prime_iff_prime_int] at hp
rw [emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime hp,
emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow hp hp1 hxy hx, h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· rw [← geom_sum₂_mul]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy _
· exact fun h => hx (hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow h)
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
| rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine hpn ⟨c, ?_⟩
rwa [pow_succ, mul_assoc]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 218 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
#s = #((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) := by rw [this]
_ = #(range n).attach := ?_
_ = #(range n) := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : #s = #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #s.attach := card_attach.symm
_ = #(s.attach.image fun a ↦ i a.1 a.2) := Eq.symm ?_
_ = #t := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : #s = #t := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : #s = #t :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : #s = #t :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : #s = #t := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
#s = #t := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
lemma card_le_card_of_injOn (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn f) :
#s ≤ #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #(s.image f) := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ #t := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {f : s → t} (hf : f.Injective) : #s ≤ #t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩
· simp
· classical
let f' : α → β := fun a => f (if ha : a ∈ s then ⟨a, ha⟩ else ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩)
apply card_le_card_of_injOn f'
· aesop
· intro a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂ haa
rw [mem_coe] at ha₁ ha₂
simp only [f', ha₁, ha₂, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at haa
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (hf haa)
lemma card_le_card_of_surjOn (f : α → β) (hf : Set.SurjOn f s t) : #t ≤ #s := by
classical unfold Set.SurjOn at hf; exact (card_le_card (mod_cast hf)).trans card_image_le
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : #t < #s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_injOn f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ #s :=
calc
n = #(range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ #s := card_le_card_of_injOn f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa)
lemma surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hinj : Set.InjOn f s)
(hst : #t ≤ #s) : Set.SurjOn f s t := by
classical
suffices s.image f = t by simp [← this, Set.SurjOn]
have : s.image f ⊆ t := by aesop (add simp Finset.subset_iff)
exact eq_of_subset_of_card_le this (hst.trans_eq (card_image_of_injOn hinj).symm)
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : #t ≤ #s) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hinj' : Set.InjOn f' s.attach := fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ Subtype.ext (hinj _ _ x.2 y.2 hxy)
have hmapsto' : Set.MapsTo f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ hf _ _
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le _ hmapsto' hinj' (by rwa [card_attach]) hb
exact ⟨a, a.2, rfl⟩
lemma injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hsurj : Set.SurjOn f s t)
(hst : #s ≤ #t) : Set.InjOn f s := by
classical
have : s.image f = t := Finset.coe_injective <| by simp [hsurj.image_eq_of_mapsTo hf]
have : #(s.image f) = #t := by rw [this]
have : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := card_image_le
rw [← card_image_iff]
omega
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : #s ≤ #t) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hsurj' : Set.SurjOn f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ by simpa [f'] using hsurj x hx
have hinj' := injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le f' (fun x hx ↦ hf _ _) hsurj' (by simpa)
exact congrArg Subtype.val (@hinj' ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ (by simp) ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (by simp) ha₁a₂)
end bij
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : #(s.disjUnion t h) = #s + #t :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∪ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm _ 1]
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t := by rw [Nat.add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∩ t) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) ≤ #s + #t :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) = #t - #s := by
suffices #(t \ s) = #(t \ s ∪ s) - #s by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) + #s = #t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : #t - #s ≤ #(t \ s) :=
calc
#t - #s ≤ #t - #(s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = #(t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ #(t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : #s ≤ #(s \ t) + #t :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
theorem card_sdiff_add_card (s t : Finset α) : #(s \ t) + #t = #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : #s = #t) : #(s \ t) = #(t \ s) :=
Nat.add_right_cancel (m := #t) <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
theorem sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : (t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (card_le_card h')
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s := by
classical simpa [Finset.Nonempty] using sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card h
| @[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 534 | 535 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Measurable
/-! # Measurability of the line derivative
We prove in `measurable_lineDeriv` that the line derivative of a function (with respect to a
locally compact scalar field) is measurable, provided the function is continuous.
In `measurable_lineDeriv_uncurry`, assuming additionally that the source space is second countable,
we show that `(x, v) ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` is also measurable.
An assumption such as continuity is necessary, as otherwise one could alternate in a non-measurable
way between differentiable and non-differentiable functions along the various lines
directed by `v`.
-/
open MeasureTheory
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [LocallyCompactSpace 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{f : E → F} {v : E}
/-!
Measurability of the line derivative `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` with respect to a fixed direction `v`.
-/
| theorem measurableSet_lineDifferentiableAt (hf : Continuous f) :
MeasurableSet {x : E | LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v} := by
borelize 𝕜
let g : E → 𝕜 → F := fun x t ↦ f (x + t • v)
have hg : Continuous g.uncurry := by fun_prop
exact measurable_prodMk_right (measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_with_param 𝕜 hg)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LineDeriv/Measurable.lean | 33 | 38 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Winston Yin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Floor
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Contracting
/-!
# Picard-Lindelöf (Cauchy-Lipschitz) Theorem
In this file we prove that an ordinary differential equation $\dot x=v(t, x)$ such that $v$ is
Lipschitz continuous in $x$ and continuous in $t$ has a local solution, see
`IsPicardLindelof.exists_forall_hasDerivWithinAt_Icc_eq`.
As a corollary, we prove that a time-independent locally continuously differentiable ODE has a
local solution.
## Implementation notes
In order to split the proof into small lemmas, we introduce a structure `PicardLindelof` that holds
all assumptions of the main theorem. This structure and lemmas in the `PicardLindelof` namespace
should be treated as private implementation details. This is not to be confused with the `Prop`-
valued structure `IsPicardLindelof`, which holds the long hypotheses of the Picard-Lindelöf
theorem for actual use as part of the public API.
We only prove existence of a solution in this file. For uniqueness see `ODE_solution_unique` and
related theorems in `Mathlib/Analysis/ODE/Gronwall.lean`.
## Tags
differential equation
-/
open Filter Function Set Metric TopologicalSpace intervalIntegral MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace (volume)
open scoped Filter Topology NNReal ENNReal Nat Interval
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- `Prop` structure holding the hypotheses of the Picard-Lindelöf theorem.
The similarly named `PicardLindelof` structure is part of the internal API for convenience, so as
not to constantly invoke choice, but is not intended for public use. -/
structure IsPicardLindelof {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] (v : ℝ → E → E) (tMin t₀ tMax : ℝ)
(x₀ : E) (L : ℝ≥0) (R C : ℝ) : Prop where
ht₀ : t₀ ∈ Icc tMin tMax
hR : 0 ≤ R
lipschitz : ∀ t ∈ Icc tMin tMax, LipschitzOnWith L (v t) (closedBall x₀ R)
cont : ∀ x ∈ closedBall x₀ R, ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ => v t x) (Icc tMin tMax)
norm_le : ∀ t ∈ Icc tMin tMax, ∀ x ∈ closedBall x₀ R, ‖v t x‖ ≤ C
C_mul_le_R : (C : ℝ) * max (tMax - t₀) (t₀ - tMin) ≤ R
/-- This structure holds arguments of the Picard-Lipschitz (Cauchy-Lipschitz) theorem. It is part of
the internal API for convenience, so as not to constantly invoke choice. Unless you want to use one
of the auxiliary lemmas, use `IsPicardLindelof.exists_forall_hasDerivWithinAt_Icc_eq` instead
of using this structure.
The similarly named `IsPicardLindelof` is a bundled `Prop` holding the long hypotheses of the
Picard-Lindelöf theorem as named arguments. It is used as part of the public API.
-/
structure PicardLindelof (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] where
/-- Function of the initial value problem -/
toFun : ℝ → E → E
/-- Lower limit of `t` -/
tMin : ℝ
/-- Upper limit of `t` -/
tMax : ℝ
/-- Initial value of `t` -/
t₀ : Icc tMin tMax
/-- Initial value of `x` -/
x₀ : E
/-- Bound of the function over the region of interest -/
C : ℝ≥0
/-- Radius of closed ball in `x` over which the bound `C` holds -/
R : ℝ≥0
/-- Lipschitz constant of the function -/
L : ℝ≥0
isPicardLindelof : IsPicardLindelof toFun tMin t₀ tMax x₀ L R C
namespace PicardLindelof
variable (v : PicardLindelof E)
instance : CoeFun (PicardLindelof E) fun _ => ℝ → E → E :=
⟨toFun⟩
instance : Inhabited (PicardLindelof E) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, ⟨0, le_rfl, le_rfl⟩, 0, 0, 0, 0,
{ ht₀ := by rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Icc_self]; exact mem_singleton _
hR := le_rfl
lipschitz := fun _ _ => (LipschitzWith.const 0).lipschitzOnWith
cont := fun _ _ => by simpa only [Pi.zero_apply] using continuousOn_const
norm_le := fun _ _ _ _ => norm_zero.le
C_mul_le_R := (zero_mul _).le }⟩⟩
theorem tMin_le_tMax : v.tMin ≤ v.tMax :=
v.t₀.2.1.trans v.t₀.2.2
protected theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc v.tMin v.tMax).Nonempty :=
nonempty_Icc.2 v.tMin_le_tMax
protected theorem lipschitzOnWith {t} (ht : t ∈ Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :
LipschitzOnWith v.L (v t) (closedBall v.x₀ v.R) :=
v.isPicardLindelof.lipschitz t ht
protected theorem continuousOn :
ContinuousOn (uncurry v) (Icc v.tMin v.tMax ×ˢ closedBall v.x₀ v.R) :=
have : ContinuousOn (uncurry (flip v)) (closedBall v.x₀ v.R ×ˢ Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :=
continuousOn_prod_of_continuousOn_lipschitzOnWith _ v.L v.isPicardLindelof.cont
v.isPicardLindelof.lipschitz
this.comp continuous_swap.continuousOn (preimage_swap_prod _ _).symm.subset
theorem norm_le {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Icc v.tMin v.tMax) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ closedBall v.x₀ v.R) :
‖v t x‖ ≤ v.C :=
v.isPicardLindelof.norm_le _ ht _ hx
/-- The maximum of distances from `t₀` to the endpoints of `[tMin, tMax]`. -/
def tDist : ℝ :=
max (v.tMax - v.t₀) (v.t₀ - v.tMin)
theorem tDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ v.tDist :=
le_max_iff.2 <| Or.inl <| sub_nonneg.2 v.t₀.2.2
theorem dist_t₀_le (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : dist t v.t₀ ≤ v.tDist := by
rw [Subtype.dist_eq, Real.dist_eq]
rcases le_total t v.t₀ with ht | ht
· rw [abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 <| Subtype.coe_le_coe.2 ht), neg_sub]
exact (sub_le_sub_left t.2.1 _).trans (le_max_right _ _)
· rw [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 <| Subtype.coe_le_coe.2 ht)]
exact (sub_le_sub_right t.2.2 _).trans (le_max_left _ _)
/-- Projection $ℝ → [t_{\min}, t_{\max}]$ sending $(-∞, t_{\min}]$ to $t_{\min}$ and $[t_{\max}, ∞)$
to $t_{\max}$. -/
def proj : ℝ → Icc v.tMin v.tMax :=
projIcc v.tMin v.tMax v.tMin_le_tMax
theorem proj_coe (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : v.proj t = t :=
projIcc_val _ _
theorem proj_of_mem {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : ↑(v.proj t) = t := by
simp only [proj, projIcc_of_mem v.tMin_le_tMax ht]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_proj : Continuous v.proj :=
continuous_projIcc
/-- The space of curves $γ \colon [t_{\min}, t_{\max}] \to E$ such that $γ(t₀) = x₀$ and $γ$ is
Lipschitz continuous with constant $C$. The map sending $γ$ to
$\mathbf Pγ(t)=x₀ + ∫_{t₀}^{t} v(τ, γ(τ))\,dτ$ is a contracting map on this space, and its fixed
point is a solution of the ODE $\dot x=v(t, x)$. -/
structure FunSpace where
/-- The particular curve represented by this object. -/
toFun : Icc v.tMin v.tMax → E
map_t₀' : toFun v.t₀ = v.x₀
lipschitz' : LipschitzWith v.C toFun
namespace FunSpace
variable {v}
variable (f : FunSpace v)
instance : CoeFun (FunSpace v) fun _ => Icc v.tMin v.tMax → E :=
⟨toFun⟩
instance : Inhabited v.FunSpace :=
⟨⟨fun _ => v.x₀, rfl, (LipschitzWith.const _).weaken (zero_le _)⟩⟩
protected theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith v.C f :=
f.lipschitz'
protected theorem continuous : Continuous f :=
f.lipschitz.continuous
/-- Each curve in `PicardLindelof.FunSpace` is continuous. -/
def toContinuousMap : v.FunSpace ↪ C(Icc v.tMin v.tMax, E) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, f.continuous⟩, fun f g h => by cases f; cases g; simpa using h⟩
instance : MetricSpace v.FunSpace :=
MetricSpace.induced toContinuousMap toContinuousMap.injective inferInstance
theorem isUniformInducing_toContinuousMap : IsUniformInducing (@toContinuousMap _ _ _ v) :=
⟨rfl⟩
theorem range_toContinuousMap :
range toContinuousMap =
{f : C(Icc v.tMin v.tMax, E) | f v.t₀ = v.x₀ ∧ LipschitzWith v.C f} := by
ext f; constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨f, hf₀, hf_lip⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨hf₀, hf_lip⟩
· rcases f with ⟨f, hf⟩; rintro ⟨hf₀, hf_lip⟩; exact ⟨⟨f, hf₀, hf_lip⟩, rfl⟩
theorem map_t₀ : f v.t₀ = v.x₀ :=
f.map_t₀'
protected theorem mem_closedBall (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : f t ∈ closedBall v.x₀ v.R :=
calc
dist (f t) v.x₀ = dist (f t) (f.toFun v.t₀) := by rw [f.map_t₀']
_ ≤ v.C * dist t v.t₀ := f.lipschitz.dist_le_mul _ _
_ ≤ v.C * v.tDist := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (v.dist_t₀_le _) v.C.2
_ ≤ v.R := v.isPicardLindelof.C_mul_le_R
/-- Given a curve $γ \colon [t_{\min}, t_{\max}] → E$, `PicardLindelof.vComp` is the function
$F(t)=v(π t, γ(π t))$, where `π` is the projection $ℝ → [t_{\min}, t_{\max}]$. The integral of this
function is the image of `γ` under the contracting map we are going to define below. -/
def vComp (t : ℝ) : E :=
v (v.proj t) (f (v.proj t))
theorem vComp_apply_coe (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : f.vComp t = v t (f t) := by
simp only [vComp, proj_coe]
theorem continuous_vComp : Continuous f.vComp := by
have := (continuous_subtype_val.prodMk f.continuous).comp v.continuous_proj
refine ContinuousOn.comp_continuous v.continuousOn this fun x => ?_
exact ⟨(v.proj x).2, f.mem_closedBall _⟩
theorem norm_vComp_le (t : ℝ) : ‖f.vComp t‖ ≤ v.C :=
v.norm_le (v.proj t).2 <| f.mem_closedBall _
theorem dist_apply_le_dist (f₁ f₂ : FunSpace v) (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :
dist (f₁ t) (f₂ t) ≤ dist f₁ f₂ :=
@ContinuousMap.dist_apply_le_dist _ _ _ _ _ (toContinuousMap f₁) (toContinuousMap f₂) _
theorem dist_le_of_forall {f₁ f₂ : FunSpace v} {d : ℝ} (h : ∀ t, dist (f₁ t) (f₂ t) ≤ d) :
dist f₁ f₂ ≤ d :=
(@ContinuousMap.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty _ _ _ _ _ (toContinuousMap f₁) (toContinuousMap f₂) _
v.nonempty_Icc.to_subtype).2 h
instance [CompleteSpace E] : CompleteSpace v.FunSpace := by
refine (completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range isUniformInducing_toContinuousMap).2
(IsClosed.isComplete ?_)
rw [range_toContinuousMap, setOf_and]
refine (isClosed_eq (continuous_eval_const _) continuous_const).inter ?_
have : IsClosed {f : Icc v.tMin v.tMax → E | LipschitzWith v.C f} :=
isClosed_setOf_lipschitzWith v.C
exact this.preimage continuous_coeFun
theorem intervalIntegrable_vComp (t₁ t₂ : ℝ) : IntervalIntegrable f.vComp volume t₁ t₂ :=
f.continuous_vComp.intervalIntegrable _ _
/-- The Picard-Lindelöf operator. This is a contracting map on `PicardLindelof.FunSpace v` such
that the fixed point of this map is the solution of the corresponding ODE.
More precisely, some iteration of this map is a contracting map. -/
def next (f : FunSpace v) : FunSpace v where
toFun t := v.x₀ + ∫ τ : ℝ in v.t₀..t, f.vComp τ
map_t₀' := by simp only [integral_same, add_zero]
lipschitz' := LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun t₁ t₂ => by
rw [dist_add_left, dist_eq_norm,
integral_interval_sub_left (f.intervalIntegrable_vComp _ _) (f.intervalIntegrable_vComp _ _)]
exact norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const fun t _ => f.norm_vComp_le _
theorem next_apply (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) : f.next t = v.x₀ + ∫ τ : ℝ in v.t₀..t, f.vComp τ :=
rfl
theorem dist_next_apply_le_of_le {f₁ f₂ : FunSpace v} {n : ℕ} {d : ℝ}
(h : ∀ t, dist (f₁ t) (f₂ t) ≤ (v.L * |t.1 - v.t₀|) ^ n / n ! * d) (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :
dist (next f₁ t) (next f₂ t) ≤ (v.L * |t.1 - v.t₀|) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)! * d := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm, next_apply, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, ←
intervalIntegral.integral_sub (intervalIntegrable_vComp _ _ _)
(intervalIntegrable_vComp _ _ _),
norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_uIoc] at *
calc
‖∫ τ in Ι (v.t₀ : ℝ) t, f₁.vComp τ - f₂.vComp τ‖ ≤
∫ τ in Ι (v.t₀ : ℝ) t, v.L * ((v.L * |τ - v.t₀|) ^ n / n ! * d) := by
refine norm_integral_le_of_norm_le (Continuous.integrableOn_uIoc (by fun_prop)) ?_
refine (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioc).mono fun τ hτ ↦ ?_
refine (v.lipschitzOnWith (v.proj τ).2).norm_sub_le_of_le (f₁.mem_closedBall _)
(f₂.mem_closedBall _) ((h _).trans_eq ?_)
rw [v.proj_of_mem]
exact uIcc_subset_Icc v.t₀.2 t.2 <| Ioc_subset_Icc_self hτ
_ = (v.L * |t.1 - v.t₀|) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)! * d := by
simp_rw [mul_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, MeasureTheory.integral_const_mul,
MeasureTheory.integral_mul_const, integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc, div_eq_mul_inv,
pow_succ' (v.L : ℝ), Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_succ, mul_inv, mul_assoc]
theorem dist_iterate_next_apply_le (f₁ f₂ : FunSpace v) (n : ℕ) (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :
dist (next^[n] f₁ t) (next^[n] f₂ t) ≤ (v.L * |t.1 - v.t₀|) ^ n / n ! * dist f₁ f₂ := by
induction n generalizing t with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, div_one, one_mul]
exact dist_apply_le_dist f₁ f₂ t
| succ n ihn =>
rw [iterate_succ_apply', iterate_succ_apply']
exact dist_next_apply_le_of_le ihn _
theorem dist_iterate_next_le (f₁ f₂ : FunSpace v) (n : ℕ) :
dist (next^[n] f₁) (next^[n] f₂) ≤ (v.L * v.tDist) ^ n / n ! * dist f₁ f₂ := by
refine dist_le_of_forall fun t => (dist_iterate_next_apply_le _ _ _ _).trans ?_
have : |(t - v.t₀ : ℝ)| ≤ v.tDist := v.dist_t₀_le t
gcongr
| variable [CompleteSpace E]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_next (t : Icc v.tMin v.tMax) :
HasDerivWithinAt (f.next ∘ v.proj) (v t (f t)) (Icc v.tMin v.tMax) t := by
haveI : Fact ((t : ℝ) ∈ Icc v.tMin v.tMax) := ⟨t.2⟩
simp only [Function.comp_def, next_apply]
refine HasDerivWithinAt.const_add _ ?_
have : HasDerivWithinAt (∫ τ in v.t₀..·, f.vComp τ) (f.vComp t) (Icc v.tMin v.tMax) t :=
integral_hasDerivWithinAt_right (f.intervalIntegrable_vComp _ _)
(f.continuous_vComp.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter _ _)
f.continuous_vComp.continuousWithinAt
rw [vComp_apply_coe] at this
refine this.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem ?_ t.coe_prop
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with _ ht'
rw [v.proj_of_mem ht']
end FunSpace
section
| Mathlib/Analysis/ODE/PicardLindelof.lean | 295 | 314 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Martin Zinkevich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Martin Zinkevich, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
/-!
# Induction principles for measurable sets, related to π-systems and λ-systems.
## Main statements
* The main theorem of this file is Dynkin's π-λ theorem, which appears
here as an induction principle `induction_on_inter`. Suppose `s` is a
collection of subsets of `α` such that the intersection of two members
of `s` belongs to `s` whenever it is nonempty. Let `m` be the σ-algebra
generated by `s`. In order to check that a predicate `C` holds on every
member of `m`, it suffices to check that `C` holds on the members of `s` and
that `C` is preserved by complementation and *disjoint* countable
unions.
* The proof of this theorem relies on the notion of `IsPiSystem`, i.e., a collection of sets
which is closed under binary non-empty intersections. Note that this is a small variation around
the usual notion in the literature, which often requires that a π-system is non-empty, and closed
also under disjoint intersections. This variation turns out to be convenient for the
formalization.
* The proof of Dynkin's π-λ theorem also requires the notion of `DynkinSystem`, i.e., a collection
of sets which contains the empty set, is closed under complementation and under countable union
of pairwise disjoint sets. The disjointness condition is the only difference with `σ`-algebras.
* `generatePiSystem g` gives the minimal π-system containing `g`.
This can be considered a Galois insertion into both measurable spaces and sets.
* `generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq` proves that if you start from a collection of sets `g`,
take the generated π-system, and then the generated σ-algebra, you get the same result as
the σ-algebra generated from `g`. This is useful because there are connections between
independent sets that are π-systems and the generated independent spaces.
* `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim` and `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'` show that any
element of the π-system generated from the union of a set of π-systems can be
represented as the intersection of a finite number of elements from these sets.
* `piiUnionInter` defines a new π-system from a family of π-systems `π : ι → Set (Set α)` and a
set of indices `S : Set ι`. `piiUnionInter π S` is the set of sets that can be written
as `⋂ x ∈ t, f x` for some finset `t ∈ S` and sets `f x ∈ π x`.
## Implementation details
* `IsPiSystem` is a predicate, not a type. Thus, we don't explicitly define the galois
insertion, nor do we define a complete lattice. In theory, we could define a complete
lattice and galois insertion on the subtype corresponding to `IsPiSystem`.
-/
open MeasurableSpace Set
open MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A π-system is a collection of subsets of `α` that is closed under binary intersection of
non-disjoint sets. Usually it is also required that the collection is nonempty, but we don't do
that here. -/
def IsPiSystem (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∀ᵉ (s ∈ C) (t ∈ C), (s ∩ t : Set α).Nonempty → s ∩ t ∈ C
namespace MeasurableSpace
theorem isPiSystem_measurableSet {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } := fun _ hs _ ht _ => hs.inter ht
end MeasurableSpace
theorem IsPiSystem.singleton (S : Set α) : IsPiSystem ({S} : Set (Set α)) := by
intro s h_s t h_t _
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_s, Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_t, Set.inter_self,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_empty {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert ∅ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· simp [hs]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert Set.univ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· rcases ht with ht | ht <;> simp [hs, ht]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [hs, ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.comap {α β} {S : Set (Set β)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) (f : α → β) :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | ∃ t ∈ S, f ⁻¹' t = s } := by
rintro _ ⟨s, hs_mem, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, ht_mem, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← Set.preimage_inter] at hst ⊢
exact ⟨s ∩ t, h_pi s hs_mem t ht_mem (nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hst), rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le {α ι} (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) p) :
IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) := by
intro t1 ht1 t2 ht2 h
rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ht1 ht2 ⊢
obtain ⟨n, ht1⟩ := ht1
obtain ⟨m, ht2⟩ := ht2
obtain ⟨k, hpnk, hpmk⟩ : ∃ k, p n ≤ p k ∧ p m ≤ p k := hp_directed n m
exact ⟨k, hp_pi k t1 (hpnk ht1) t2 (hpmk ht2) h⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone {α ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_mono : Monotone p) : IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) :=
isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le p hp_pi (Monotone.directed_le hp_mono)
/-- Rectangles formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
lemma IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C) (hD : IsPiSystem D) :
IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
section Order
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} [LinearOrder α]
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iio (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iio '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iio_inter_Iio.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iio : IsPiSystem (range Iio : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iio ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iio univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ioi (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ioi '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iio αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ioi : IsPiSystem (range Ioi : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ioi ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ioi univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iic (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iic '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iic_inter_Iic.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iic : IsPiSystem (range Iic : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iic ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iic univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ici (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ici '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iic αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ici : IsPiSystem (range Ici : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ici ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ici univ
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx_mem {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), p l u ∧ Ixx l u = S } := by
rintro _ ⟨l₁, hls₁, u₁, hut₁, _, rfl⟩ _ ⟨l₂, hls₂, u₂, hut₂, _, rfl⟩
simp only [Hi]
exact fun H => ⟨l₁ ⊔ l₂, sup_ind l₁ l₂ hls₁ hls₂, u₁ ⊓ u₂, inf_ind u₁ u₂ hut₁ hut₂, Hne H, rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (f : ι → α)
(g : ι' → α) : @IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, p (f i) (g j) ∧ Ixx (f i) (g j) = S } := by
simpa only [exists_range_iff] using isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (@Hne) (@Hi) (range f) (range g)
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioo l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ l u, f l < g u ∧ Ioo (f l) (g u) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ioc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ico_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ico (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ico (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico f g
theorem isPiSystem_Icc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l ≤ u ∧ Icc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) s t
theorem isPiSystem_Icc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i ≤ g j ∧ Icc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) f g
end Order
/-- Given a collection `S` of subsets of `α`, then `generatePiSystem S` is the smallest
π-system containing `S`. -/
inductive generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : Set (Set α)
| base {s : Set α} (h_s : s ∈ S) : generatePiSystem S s
| inter {s t : Set α} (h_s : generatePiSystem S s) (h_t : generatePiSystem S t)
(h_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : generatePiSystem S (s ∩ t)
theorem isPiSystem_generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : IsPiSystem (generatePiSystem S) :=
fun _ h_s _ h_t h_nonempty => generatePiSystem.inter h_s h_t h_nonempty
theorem subset_generatePiSystem_self (S : Set (Set α)) : S ⊆ generatePiSystem S := fun _ =>
generatePiSystem.base
theorem generatePiSystem_subset_self {S : Set (Set α)} (h_S : IsPiSystem S) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ S := fun x h => by
induction h with
| base h_s => exact h_s
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact h_S _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_eq {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) : generatePiSystem S = S :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (generatePiSystem_subset_self h_pi) (subset_generatePiSystem_self S)
theorem generatePiSystem_mono {S T : Set (Set α)} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ generatePiSystem T := fun t ht => by
induction ht with
| base h_s => exact generatePiSystem.base (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hST h_s)
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact isPiSystem_generatePiSystem T _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_measurableSet [M : MeasurableSpace α] {S : Set (Set α)}
(h_meas_S : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) (h_in_pi : t ∈ generatePiSystem S) :
MeasurableSet t := by
induction h_in_pi with
| base h_s => apply h_meas_S _ h_s
| inter _ _ _ h_s h_u => apply MeasurableSet.inter h_s h_u
theorem generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem {g : Set (Set α)} (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ generatePiSystem g) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom g] t :=
@generatePiSystem_measurableSet α (generateFrom g) g
(fun _ h_s_in_g => measurableSet_generateFrom h_s_in_g) t ht
theorem generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq {g : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (generatePiSystem g) = generateFrom g := by
apply le_antisymm <;> apply generateFrom_le
· exact fun t h_t => generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem t h_t
| · exact fun t h_t => measurableSet_generateFrom (generatePiSystem.base h_t)
/-- Every element of the π-system generated by the union of a family of π-systems
is a finite intersection of elements from the π-systems.
For an indexed union version, see `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/PiSystem.lean | 249 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.CommShift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.ShiftSequence
/-! # Induced shift sequences
When `G : C ⥤ A` is a functor from a category equipped with a shift by a
monoid `M`, we have defined in the file `CategoryTheory.Shift.ShiftSequence`
a type class `G.ShiftSequence M` which provides functors `G.shift a : C ⥤ A` for all `a : M`,
isomorphisms `shiftFunctor C n ⋙ G.shift a ≅ G.shift a'` when `n + a = a'`,
and isomorphisms `G.isoShift a : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ G ≅ G.shift a` for all `a`, all of
which satisfy good coherence properties. The idea is that it allows to use functors
`G.shift a` which may have better definitional properties than `shiftFunctor C a ⋙ G`.
The typical example shall be `[(homologyFunctor C (ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).ShiftSequence ℤ]`
for any abelian category `C` (TODO).
Similarly as a shift on a category may induce a shift on a quotient or a localized
category (see the file `CategoryTheory.Shift.Induced`), this file shows that
under certain assumptions, there is an induced "shift sequence". The main application
will be the construction of a shift sequence for the homology functor on the
homotopy category of cochain complexes (TODO), and also on the derived category (TODO).
-/
open CategoryTheory Category
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D A : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Category A]
{L : C ⥤ D} {F : D ⥤ A} {G : C ⥤ A} (e : L ⋙ F ≅ G) (M : Type*)
[AddMonoid M] [HasShift C M]
[G.ShiftSequence M] (F' : M → D ⥤ A) (e' : ∀ m, L ⋙ F' m ≅ G.shift m)
[((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).Full] [((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).Faithful]
namespace Functor
namespace ShiftSequence
namespace induced
/-- The `isoZero` field of the induced shift sequence. -/
noncomputable def isoZero : F' 0 ≅ F :=
((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).preimageIso (e' 0 ≪≫ G.isoShiftZero M ≪≫ e.symm)
lemma isoZero_hom_app_obj (X : C) :
(isoZero e M F' e').hom.app (L.obj X) =
(e' 0).hom.app X ≫ (isoShiftZero G M).hom.app X ≫ e.inv.app X :=
NatTrans.congr_app (((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).map_preimage _) X
variable (L G)
variable [HasShift D M] [L.CommShift M]
/-- The `shiftIso` field of the induced shift sequence. -/
noncomputable def shiftIso (n a a' : M) (ha' : n + a = a') :
shiftFunctor D n ⋙ F' a ≅ F' a' := by
exact ((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).preimageIso ((Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (L.commShiftIso n).symm _ ≪≫
Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft _ (e' a) ≪≫
G.shiftIso n a a' ha' ≪≫ (e' a').symm)
lemma shiftIso_hom_app_obj (n a a' : M) (ha' : n + a = a') (X : C) :
(shiftIso L G M F' e' n a a' ha').hom.app (L.obj X) =
(F' a).map ((L.commShiftIso n).inv.app X) ≫
(e' a).hom.app (X⟦n⟧) ≫ (G.shiftIso n a a' ha').hom.app X ≫ (e' a').inv.app X :=
(NatTrans.congr_app (((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).map_preimage _) X).trans (by simp)
attribute [irreducible] isoZero shiftIso
end induced
variable [HasShift D M] [L.CommShift M]
/-- Given an isomorphism of functors `e : L ⋙ F ≅ G` relating functors `L : C ⥤ D`,
`F : D ⥤ A` and `G : C ⥤ A`, an additive monoid `M`, a family of functors `F' : M → D ⥤ A`
equipped with isomorphisms `e' : ∀ m, L ⋙ F' m ≅ G.shift m`, this is the shift sequence
induced on `F` induced by a shift sequence for the functor `G`, provided that
the functor `(whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L` of precomposition by `L` is fully faithful. -/
noncomputable def induced : F.ShiftSequence M where
sequence := F'
isoZero := induced.isoZero e M F' e'
shiftIso := induced.shiftIso L G M F' e'
shiftIso_zero a := by
ext1
apply ((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).map_injective
ext K
dsimp
simp only [induced.shiftIso_hom_app_obj, shiftIso_zero_hom_app, id_obj,
NatTrans.naturality, comp_map, Iso.hom_inv_id_app_assoc,
comp_id, ← Functor.map_comp, L.commShiftIso_zero, CommShift.isoZero_inv_app, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app, Functor.map_id]
shiftIso_add n m a a' a'' ha' ha'' := by
ext1
apply ((whiskeringLeft C D A).obj L).map_injective
ext K
dsimp
simp only [id_comp, induced.shiftIso_hom_app_obj,
G.shiftIso_add_hom_app n m a a' a'' ha' ha'', L.commShiftIso_add,
comp_obj, CommShift.isoAdd_inv_app, (F' a).map_comp, assoc,
← (e' a).hom.naturality_assoc, comp_map]
simp only [← NatTrans.naturality_assoc, induced.shiftIso_hom_app_obj,
← Functor.map_comp_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_obj,
Functor.map_id, id_comp]
dsimp
simp only [Functor.map_comp, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma induced_isoShiftZero_hom_app_obj (X : C) :
letI := (induced e M F' e')
(F.isoShiftZero M).hom.app (L.obj X) =
| (e' 0).hom.app X ≫ (isoShiftZero G M).hom.app X ≫ e.inv.app X := by
apply induced.isoZero_hom_app_obj
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma induced_shiftIso_hom_app_obj (n a a' : M) (ha' : n + a = a') (X : C) :
letI := (induced e M F' e')
(F.shiftIso n a a' ha').hom.app (L.obj X) =
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Shift/InducedShiftSequence.lean | 114 | 120 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,696 | 2,698 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
theorem next_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
next l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + 1) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt hi))) :=
match l, h, i, hi with
| [], _, i, hi => by simp at hi
| [_], _, _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, 0, h0 => by
have h₁ : (x :: y :: l)[0] = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, i+1, hi => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l)[i+1] ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
| refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 251 | 262 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.BalancedCoreHull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Von Neumann Boundedness
This file defines natural or von Neumann bounded sets and proves elementary properties.
## Main declarations
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded`: A set `s` is von Neumann-bounded if every neighborhood of zero
absorbs `s`.
* `Bornology.vonNBornology`: The bornology made of the von Neumann-bounded sets.
## Main results
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le`: A coarser topology admits more
von Neumann-bounded sets.
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.image`: A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded.
* `Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero`: Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends
to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`,
`ε • x` tends to 0. This shows that bounded sets are completely determined by sequences, which is
the key fact for proving that sequential continuity implies continuity for linear maps defined on
a bornological space
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
-/
variable {𝕜 𝕜' E F ι : Type*}
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Topology Pointwise
namespace Bornology
section SeminormedRing
section Zero
variable (𝕜)
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Zero E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- A set `s` is von Neumann bounded if every neighborhood of 0 absorbs `s`. -/
def IsVonNBounded (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) → Absorbs 𝕜 V s
variable (E)
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_empty : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ _ => Absorbs.empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem isVonNBounded_iff (s : Set E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Absorbs 𝕜 V s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff {q : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} {A : Set E}
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis q s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 A ↔ ∀ i, q i → Absorbs 𝕜 (s i) A := by
refine ⟨fun hA i hi => hA (h.mem_of_mem hi), fun hA V hV => ?_⟩
rcases h.mem_iff.mp hV with ⟨i, hi, hV⟩
exact (hA i hi).mono_left hV
/-- Subsets of bounded sets are bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁ := fun _ hV => (hs₂ hV).mono_right h
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_union {s t : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s ∪ t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_union, forall_and]
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.union {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (hs₁ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s₁ ∪ s₂) := isVonNBounded_union.2 ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace 𝕜] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := fun _ _ ↦
.of_boundedSpace
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
fun U hU ↦ .of_forall fun c ↦ calc
s ⊆ univ := subset_univ s
_ = c • U := .symm <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty <| (Filter.nonempty_of_mem hU).image _
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_iUnion, @forall_swap ι]
theorem isVonNBounded_biUnion {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
have _ := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, isVonNBounded_iUnion, Subtype.forall]
theorem isVonNBounded_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : S.Finite) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, isVonNBounded_biUnion hS]
end Zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddZeroClass E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.add (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) := fun U hU ↦ by
rcases exists_open_nhds_zero_add_subset hU with ⟨V, hVo, hV, hVU⟩
exact ((hs <| hVo.mem_nhds hV).add (ht <| hVo.mem_nhds hV)).mono_left hVU
end ContinuousAdd
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
[DistribMulAction 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.neg (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) := fun U hU ↦ by
rw [← neg_neg U]
exact (hs <| neg_mem_nhds_zero _ hU).neg_neg
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_neg : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg s ▸ h.neg, fun h ↦ h.neg⟩
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.of_neg, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_neg
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.sub (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hs.add ht.neg
end IsTopologicalAddGroup
end SeminormedRing
section MultipleTopologies
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- If a topology `t'` is coarser than `t`, then any set `s` that is bounded with respect to
`t` is bounded with respect to `t'`. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace E} (h : t ≤ t') {s : Set E}
(hs : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t s) : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t' s := fun _ hV =>
hs <| (le_iff_nhds t t').mp h 0 hV
end MultipleTopologies
lemma isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ Tendsto (· • S : 𝕜 → Set E) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0).smallSets := by
rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun V hV ↦ ?_
simp only [absorbs_iff_eventually_nhds_zero (mem_of_mem_nhds hV), mapsTo', image_smul]
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.tendsto_smallSets_nhds, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds
lemma isVonNBounded_iff_absorbing_le {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ Filter.absorbing 𝕜 S ≤ 𝓝 0 :=
.rfl
lemma isVonNBounded_pi_iff {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[∀ i, AddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, Module 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (E i)]
{S : Set (∀ i, E i)} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (eval i '' S) := by
simp_rw [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, smallSets_iInf,
smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def,
← image_smul, image_image, eval, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
section Image
variable {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₁] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module 𝕜₁ E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded. -/
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.image {σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomSurjective σ] [RingHomIsometric σ]
{s : Set E} (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₁ s) (f : E →SL[σ] F) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₂ (f '' s) := by
have σ_iso : Isometry σ := AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm σ fun x => RingHomIsometric.is_iso
have : map σ (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 0 := by
rw [σ_iso.isEmbedding.map_nhds_eq, σ.surjective.range_eq, nhdsWithin_univ, map_zero]
have hf₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := f.continuous.tendsto' 0 0 (map_zero f)
simp only [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, ← this, tendsto_map'_iff] at hs ⊢
simpa only [comp_def, image_smul_setₛₗ] using hf₀.image_smallSets.comp hs
end Image
section sequence
theorem IsVonNBounded.smul_tendsto_zero [NormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
{S : Set E} {ε : ι → 𝕜} {x : ι → E} {l : Filter ι}
(hS : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S) (hxS : ∀ᶠ n in l, x n ∈ S) (hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
(hS.tendsto_smallSets_nhds.comp hε).of_smallSets <| hxS.mono fun _ ↦ smul_mem_smul_set
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕜} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : ∀ᶠ n in l, ε n ≠ 0) {S : Set E}
(H : ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0)) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S := by
rw [(nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜 E).isVonNBounded_iff]
by_contra! H'
rcases H' with ⟨V, ⟨hV, hVb⟩, hVS⟩
have : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∃ x : S, ε n • (x : E) ∉ V := by
filter_upwards [hε] with n hn
rw [absorbs_iff_norm] at hVS
push_neg at hVS
rcases hVS ‖(ε n)⁻¹‖ with ⟨a, haε, haS⟩
rcases Set.not_subset.mp haS with ⟨x, hxS, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, hxS⟩, fun hnx => ?_⟩
rw [← Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hn] at hnx
exact hx (hVb.smul_mono haε hnx)
rcases this.choice with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine Filter.frequently_false l (Filter.Eventually.frequently ?_)
filter_upwards [hx,
(H (_ ∘ x) fun n => (x n).2).eventually (eventually_mem_set.mpr hV)] using fun n => id
/-- Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded
if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`, `ε • x` tends to 0. This actually works for any
indexing type `ι`, but in the special case `ι = ℕ` we get the important fact that convergent
sequences fully characterize bounded sets. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕜} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝[≠] 0)) {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun hS _ hxS => hS.smul_tendsto_zero (Eventually.of_forall hxS) (le_trans hε nhdsWithin_le_nhds),
isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero (by exact hε self_mem_nhdsWithin)⟩
end sequence
/-- If a set is von Neumann bounded with respect to a smaller field,
then it is also von Neumann bounded with respect to a larger field.
See also `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.restrict_scalars` below. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.extend_scalars [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
(𝕝 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕝] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕝]
[Module 𝕝 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕝 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕝 E]
{s : Set E} (h : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕝 s := by
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hε₀⟩ : ∃ ε : ℕ → 𝕜, Tendsto ε atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ε n ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff] using exists_seq_tendsto (𝓝[≠] (0 : 𝕜))
refine isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero (ε := (ε · • 1)) (by simpa) fun x hx ↦ ?_
have := h.smul_tendsto_zero (.of_forall hx) hε
simpa only [Pi.smul_def', smul_one_smul]
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- Singletons are bounded. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_singleton (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 ({x} : Set E) := fun _ hV =>
(absorbent_nhds_zero hV).absorbs
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_insert (x : E) {s : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (insert x s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
simp only [← singleton_union, isVonNBounded_union, isVonNBounded_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, IsVonNBounded.insert⟩ := isVonNBounded_insert
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.vadd (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (x : E) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) := by
rw [← singleton_vadd]
-- TODO: dot notation timeouts in the next line
exact IsVonNBounded.add (isVonNBounded_singleton x) hs
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_vadd (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.vadd (-x), fun h ↦ h.vadd x⟩
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_right (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
| (isVonNBounded_vadd x).mp <| hst.subset <| image_subset_image2_right hx
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_left (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
((add_comm s t).subst hst).of_add_right ht
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded.lean | 296 | 300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop
/-! # Structures involving `*` and `0` on `WithTop` and `WithBot`
The main results of this section are `WithTop.instOrderedCommSemiring` and
`WithBot.instOrderedCommSemiring`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace WithTop
variable [DecidableEq α]
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {a b : WithTop α}
instance instMulZeroClass : MulZeroClass (WithTop α) where
zero := 0
mul
| (a : α), (b : α) => ↑(a * b)
| (a : α), ⊤ => if a = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| ⊤, (b : α) => if b = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| ⊤, ⊤ => ⊤
mul_zero
| (a : α) => congr_arg some <| mul_zero _
| ⊤ => if_pos rfl
zero_mul
| (b : α) => congr_arg some <| zero_mul _
| ⊤ => if_pos rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : (↑(a * b) : WithTop α) = a * b := rfl
lemma mul_top' : ∀ (a : WithTop α), a * ⊤ = if a = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| (a : α) => if_congr coe_eq_zero.symm rfl rfl
| ⊤ => (if_neg top_ne_zero).symm
@[simp] lemma mul_top (h : a ≠ 0) : a * ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [mul_top', if_neg h]
lemma top_mul' : ∀ (b : WithTop α), ⊤ * b = if b = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| (b : α) => if_congr coe_eq_zero.symm rfl rfl
| ⊤ => (if_neg top_ne_zero).symm
@[simp] lemma top_mul (hb : b ≠ 0) : ⊤ * b = ⊤ := by rw [top_mul', if_neg hb]
@[simp] lemma top_mul_top : (⊤ * ⊤ : WithTop α) = ⊤ := rfl
lemma mul_def (a b : WithTop α) :
a * b = if a = 0 ∨ b = 0 then 0 else WithTop.map₂ (· * ·) a b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> aesop
lemma mul_eq_top_iff : a * b = ⊤ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ⊤ ∨ a = ⊤ ∧ b ≠ 0 := by rw [mul_def]; aesop
lemma mul_coe_eq_bind {b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : ∀ a, (a * b : WithTop α) = a.bind fun a ↦ ↑(a * b)
| ⊤ => by simp [top_mul, hb]; rfl
| (a : α) => rfl
lemma coe_mul_eq_bind {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∀ b, (a * b : WithTop α) = b.bind fun b ↦ ↑(a * b)
| ⊤ => by simp [top_mul, ha]; rfl
| (b : α) => rfl
@[simp]
lemma untopD_zero_mul (a b : WithTop α) : (a * b).untopD 0 = a.untopD 0 * b.untopD 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0; · rw [ha, zero_mul, ← coe_zero, untopD_coe, zero_mul]
by_cases hb : b = 0; · rw [hb, mul_zero, ← coe_zero, untopD_coe, mul_zero]
induction a; · rw [top_mul hb, untopD_top, zero_mul]
induction b; · rw [mul_top ha, untopD_top, mul_zero]
rw [← coe_mul, untopD_coe, untopD_coe, untopD_coe]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias untop'_zero_mul := untopD_zero_mul
theorem mul_ne_top {a b : WithTop α} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a * b ≠ ⊤ := by
simp [mul_eq_top_iff, *]
theorem mul_lt_top [LT α] {a b : WithTop α} (ha : a < ⊤) (hb : b < ⊤) : a * b < ⊤ := by
rw [WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top] at *
exact mul_ne_top ha hb
instance instNoZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors α] : NoZeroDivisors (WithTop α) := by
refine ⟨fun h₁ => Decidable.byContradiction fun h₂ => ?_⟩
rw [mul_def, if_neg h₂] at h₁
rcases Option.mem_map₂_iff.1 h₁ with ⟨a, b, (rfl : _ = _), (rfl : _ = _), hab⟩
exact h₂ ((eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hab).imp (congr_arg some) (congr_arg some))
end MulZeroClass
/-- `Nontrivial α` is needed here as otherwise we have `1 * ⊤ = ⊤` but also `0 * ⊤ = 0`. -/
instance instMulZeroOneClass [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] : MulZeroOneClass (WithTop α) where
__ := instMulZeroClass
one_mul
| ⊤ => mul_top (mt coe_eq_coe.1 one_ne_zero)
| (a : α) => by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]
mul_one
| ⊤ => top_mul (mt coe_eq_coe.1 one_ne_zero)
| (a : α) => by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]
/-- A version of `WithTop.map` for `MonoidWithZeroHom`s. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
protected def _root_.MonoidWithZeroHom.withTopMap {R S : Type*} [MulZeroOneClass R] [DecidableEq R]
[Nontrivial R] [MulZeroOneClass S] [DecidableEq S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →*₀ S)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : WithTop R →*₀ WithTop S :=
{ f.toZeroHom.withTopMap, f.toMonoidHom.toOneHom.withTopMap with
toFun := WithTop.map f
map_mul' := fun x y => by
have : ∀ z, map f z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := fun z =>
(Option.map_injective hf).eq_iff' f.toZeroHom.withTopMap.map_zero
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
induction' x with x
· simp [hy, this]
induction' y with y
· have : (f x : WithTop S) ≠ 0 := by simpa [hf.eq_iff' (map_zero f)] using hx
simp [mul_top hx, mul_top this]
· simp [← coe_mul] }
instance instSemigroupWithZero [SemigroupWithZero α] [NoZeroDivisors α] :
SemigroupWithZero (WithTop α) where
__ := instMulZeroClass
mul_assoc a b c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp only [zero_mul]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb); · simp only [zero_mul, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp only [mul_zero]
induction' a with a; · simp [hb, hc]
induction' b with b; · simp [mul_top ha, top_mul hc]
induction' c with c
· rw [mul_top hb, mul_top ha]
rw [← coe_zero, ne_eq, coe_eq_coe] at ha hb
simp [ha, hb]
simp only [← coe_mul, mul_assoc]
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero α] [NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] {x : WithTop α} {n : ℕ}
instance instMonoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero (WithTop α) where
__ := instMulZeroOneClass
__ := instSemigroupWithZero
npow n a := match a, n with
| (a : α), n => ↑(a ^ n)
| ⊤, 0 => 1
| ⊤, _n + 1 => ⊤
npow_zero a := by cases a <;> simp
npow_succ n a := by cases n <;> cases a <;> simp [pow_succ]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (↑(a ^ n) : WithTop α) = a ^ n := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (⊤ : WithTop α) ^ n = ⊤ | _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_top_iff : x ^ n = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
induction x <;> cases n <;> simp [← coe_pow]
lemma pow_ne_top_iff : x ^ n ≠ ⊤ ↔ x ≠ ⊤ ∨ n = 0 := by simp [pow_eq_top_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left]
@[simp] lemma pow_lt_top_iff [Preorder α] : x ^ n < ⊤ ↔ x < ⊤ ∨ n = 0 := by
simp_rw [WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, pow_ne_top_iff]
lemma eq_top_of_pow (n : ℕ) (hx : x ^ n = ⊤) : x = ⊤ := (pow_eq_top_iff.1 hx).1
lemma pow_ne_top (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ n ≠ ⊤ := pow_ne_top_iff.2 <| .inl hx
lemma pow_lt_top [Preorder α] (hx : x < ⊤) : x ^ n < ⊤ := pow_lt_top_iff.2 <| .inl hx
end MonoidWithZero
instance instCommMonoidWithZero [CommMonoidWithZero α] [NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] :
CommMonoidWithZero (WithTop α) where
__ := instMonoidWithZero
mul_comm a b := by simp_rw [mul_def]; exact if_congr or_comm rfl (Option.map₂_comm mul_comm)
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [PartialOrder α]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd α] : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (WithTop α) where
toAddCommMonoid := WithTop.addCommMonoid
__ := WithTop.instMulZeroClass
right_distrib a b c := by
induction' c with c
· by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> simp [ha]
· by_cases hc : c = 0; · simp [hc]
simp only [mul_coe_eq_bind hc]
cases a <;> cases b <;> try rfl
exact congr_arg some (add_mul _ _ _)
left_distrib c a b := by
induction' c with c
· by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> simp [ha]
· by_cases hc : c = 0; · simp [hc]
simp only [coe_mul_eq_bind hc]
cases a <;> cases b <;> try rfl
exact congr_arg some (mul_add _ _ _)
instance instNonAssocSemiring [NonAssocSemiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
[Nontrivial α] : NonAssocSemiring (WithTop α) where
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
__ := WithTop.instMulZeroOneClass
__ := WithTop.addCommMonoidWithOne
instance instNonUnitalSemiring [NonUnitalSemiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
[NoZeroDivisors α] : NonUnitalSemiring (WithTop α) where
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := WithTop.instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
__ := WithTop.instSemigroupWithZero
instance instSemiring [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
[NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] : Semiring (WithTop α) where
toNonUnitalSemiring := WithTop.instNonUnitalSemiring
__ := WithTop.instMonoidWithZero
__ := WithTop.addCommMonoidWithOne
instance instCommSemiring [CommSemiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
[NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] : CommSemiring (WithTop α) where
toSemiring := WithTop.instSemiring
__ := WithTop.instCommMonoidWithZero
instance instIsOrderedRing [CommSemiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
[NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] : IsOrderedRing (WithTop α) :=
CanonicallyOrderedAdd.toIsOrderedRing
/-- A version of `WithTop.map` for `RingHom`s. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
protected def _root_.RingHom.withTopMap {R S : Type*}
[NonAssocSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd R]
[DecidableEq R] [Nontrivial R]
[NonAssocSemiring S] [PartialOrder S] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd S]
[DecidableEq S] [Nontrivial S]
(f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) : WithTop R →+* WithTop S :=
{MonoidWithZeroHom.withTopMap f.toMonoidWithZeroHom hf, f.toAddMonoidHom.withTopMap with}
variable [CommSemiring α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α] [PosMulStrictMono α]
{a a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : WithTop α}
@[gcongr]
protected lemma mul_lt_mul (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : a₁ * b₁ < a₂ * b₂ := by
have := posMulStrictMono_iff_mulPosStrictMono.1 ‹_›
lift a₁ to α using ha.lt_top.ne
lift b₁ to α using hb.lt_top.ne
obtain rfl | ha₂ := eq_or_ne a₂ ⊤
· rw [top_mul (by simpa [bot_eq_zero] using hb.bot_lt.ne')]
exact coe_lt_top _
obtain rfl | hb₂ := eq_or_ne b₂ ⊤
· rw [mul_top (by simpa [bot_eq_zero] using ha.bot_lt.ne')]
exact coe_lt_top _
lift a₂ to α using ha₂
lift b₂ to α using hb₂
norm_cast at *
obtain rfl | hb₁ := eq_zero_or_pos b₁
· rw [mul_zero]
exact mul_pos (by simpa [bot_eq_zero] using ha.bot_lt) hb
| · exact mul_lt_mul ha hb.le hb₁ (zero_le _)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/WithTop.lean | 252 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,389 | 1,390 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
theorem isSquare_iff {q : ℚ} : IsSquare q ↔ IsSquare q.num ∧ IsSquare q.den := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨qr, rfl⟩
rw [Rat.mul_self_num, mul_self_den]
simp only [IsSquare.mul_self, and_self]
· rintro ⟨⟨nr, hnr⟩, ⟨dr, hdr⟩⟩
refine ⟨nr / dr, ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_div_comm, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← hnr, ← hdr, num_div_den]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : IsSquare (n : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare n := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, num_natCast, den_natCast, IsSquare.one, and_true, Int.isSquare_natCast_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} : IsSquare (z : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare z := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, intCast_num, intCast_den, IsSquare.one, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem isSquare_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsSquare (ofNat(n) : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
isSquare_natCast_iff
section Casts
theorem exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).den :=
haveI : (n : ℚ) / d = Rat.divInt n d := by rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div]
Rat.num_den_mk d_ne_zero this
theorem mul_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q * r).num * q.den * r.den = q.num * r.num * (q * r).den := by
let s := q.num * r.num /. (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.num) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
rw [Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_mul_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h, mul_comm, ← Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul, ← divInt_eq_div]
theorem add_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q + r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) * (q + r).den := by
let s := divInt (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
repeat rw [Int.mul_assoc]
apply mul_eq_mul_left_iff.2
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_add_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h]
rw [mul_comm]
apply Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mp
rw [← divInt_eq_div]
theorem substr_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q - r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den - r.num * q.den) * (q - r).den := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← num_neg_eq_neg_num, ← den_neg_eq_den r,
add_num_den' q (-r)]
end Casts
protected theorem inv_neg (q : ℚ) : (-q)⁻¹ = -q⁻¹ := by
rw [← num_divInt_den q]
simp only [Rat.neg_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', eq_self_iff_true, Rat.divInt_neg]
theorem num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem den_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
((a / b : ℚ).den : ℤ) = b := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d) (h1 : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs)
(h2 : Nat.Coprime c.natAbs d.natAbs) (h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d := by
apply And.intro
· rw [← num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
· rw [← den_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, den_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp only [Int.cast_zero, Int.zero_tdiv, zero_div, Int.ediv_zero]
· have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [← coe_int_inj] at hn
simp only [Int.ediv_self hn, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff, div_self this]
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
intCast_div_self n
theorem intCast_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b := by
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm b, Int.mul_ediv_assoc c (dvd_refl b), Int.cast_mul,
intCast_div_self, Int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc]
theorem natCast_div (a b : ℕ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℕ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
intCast_div a b (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr h)
theorem den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℤ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m := by
replace hn : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := num_ne_zero.mp hn
constructor
· rw [Rat.den_eq_one_iff, eq_div_iff hn]
exact mod_cast (Dvd.intro_left _)
· exact (intCast_div _ _ · ▸ rfl)
theorem den_div_natCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m :=
(den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff m n (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hn)).trans Int.ofNat_dvd
theorem inv_intCast_num_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply num_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_num_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_intCast_num_of_pos (mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
theorem inv_intCast_den_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : ((a : ℚ)⁻¹.den : ℤ) = a := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply den_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_den_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = a := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, ← Int.cast_natCast a, inv_intCast_den_of_pos]
rwa [Int.natCast_pos]
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_num (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
simp [Rat.inv_neg, inv_intCast_num_of_pos lt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr lt]
· simp
· simp [inv_intCast_num_of_pos gt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr gt]
@[simp]
theorem inv_natCast_num (a : ℕ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a :=
inv_intCast_num a
@[simp]
theorem inv_ofNat_num (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_natCast_num_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_neZero a)
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_den (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = if a = 0 then 1 else a.natAbs := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]
| rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
rw [if_neg (by omega)]
simp only [Int.cast_neg, Rat.inv_neg, neg_den, inv_intCast_den_of_pos lt, Int.natAbs_neg]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 271 | 275 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-! # Functions integrable on a set and at a filter
We define `IntegrableOn f s μ := Integrable f (μ.restrict s)` and prove theorems like
`integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ`.
Next we define a predicate `IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α)`
saying that `f` is integrable at some set `s ∈ l` and prove that a measurable function is integrable
at `l` with respect to `μ` provided that `f` is bounded above at `l ⊓ ae μ` and `μ` is finite
at `l`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Function
open scoped Topology Interval Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ε E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [ENorm ε] [TopologicalSpace ε]
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β] {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function `f` is strongly measurable at a filter `l` w.r.t. a measure `μ` if it is
ae strongly measurable w.r.t. `μ.restrict s` for some `s ∈ l`. -/
def StronglyMeasurableAtFilter (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)
@[simp]
theorem stronglyMeasurableAt_bot {f : α → β} : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f ⊥ μ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp⟩
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.eventually (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(eventually_smallSets' fun _ _ => AEStronglyMeasurable.mono_set).2 h
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.filter_mono (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ)
(h' : l' ≤ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := h
⟨s, h' hsl, hs⟩
protected theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ]⟩
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem {s}
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hl : s ∈ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨s, hl, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-12")]
alias AeStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem
protected theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
h.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
end
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
{μ : Measure α} {C} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict s) :=
haveI : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨by rwa [Measure.restrict_apply_univ]⟩
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded hf
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {s t : Set α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function is `IntegrableOn` a set `s` if it is almost everywhere strongly measurable on `s`
and if the integral of its pointwise norm over `s` is less than infinity. -/
def IntegrableOn (f : α → ε) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable f (μ.restrict s)
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : Integrable f (μ.restrict s) :=
h
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_empty : IntegrableOn f ∅ μ := by simp [IntegrableOn, integrable_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_univ : IntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_univ]
theorem integrableOn_zero : IntegrableOn (fun _ => (0 : E)) s μ :=
integrable_zero _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_const {C : E} : IntegrableOn (fun _ => C) s μ ↔ C = 0 ∨ μ s < ∞ :=
integrable_const_iff.trans <| by rw [isFiniteMeasure_restrict, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
theorem IntegrableOn.mono (h : IntegrableOn f t ν) (hs : s ⊆ t) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono hs hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono hst le_rfl
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_measure (h : IntegrableOn f s ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono (Subset.refl _) hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.integrable.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_ae hst
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set_ae hst.le
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun_ae (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
Integrable.congr h hst
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun_ae (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst, fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst.symm⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
h.congr_fun_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 (Eventually.of_forall hst))
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun hst hs, fun h => h.congr_fun hst.symm hs⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableOn (h : Integrable f μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ := h.restrict
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t) := by
dsimp only [IntegrableOn] at h ⊢
exact h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self _
theorem IntegrableOn.inter_of_restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t)) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∩ t) μ := by
have := h.mono_set (inter_subset_left (t := t))
rwa [IntegrableOn, μ.restrict_restrict_of_subset inter_subset_right] at this
lemma Integrable.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : IntegrableOn g sᶜ μ) :
Integrable (s.piecewise f g) μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn] at hf hg
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact MemLp.piecewise hs hf hg
theorem IntegrableOn.left_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_left
theorem IntegrableOn.right_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_right
theorem IntegrableOn.union (hs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ :=
(hs.add_measure ht).mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_union_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_union, h.right_of_union⟩, fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_singleton_iff {x : α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
IntegrableOn f {x} μ ↔ f x = 0 ∨ μ {x} < ∞ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x}] fun _ => f x := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_singleton x)] with _ ha
simp only [mem_singleton_iff.1 ha]
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr this, integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict,
lt_top_iff_ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_biUnion {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hf => simp [hf, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finset_iUnion {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ :=
integrableOn_finite_biUnion s.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_iUnion [Finite β] {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype β
simpa using @integrableOn_finset_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ f μ Finset.univ t
lemma IntegrableOn.finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
rw [← s.toSet.biUnion_of_singleton]
simp [integrableOn_finset_iUnion, measure_lt_top]
lemma IntegrableOn.of_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simpa using IntegrableOn.finset (s := hs.toFinset)
theorem IntegrableOn.add_measure (hμ : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hν : IntegrableOn f s ν) :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) := by
delta IntegrableOn; rw [Measure.restrict_add]; exact hμ.integrable.add_measure hν
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_add_measure :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_right le_rfl), h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_left le_rfl)⟩,
fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, he.restrict_map, he.integrable_map_iff]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range e) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableOn_map_iff, he.map_comap, IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_range_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableOn f (range e) μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ e) (μ.comap e) := by
rw [he.integrableOn_iff_comap .rfl, preimage_range, integrableOn_univ]
theorem integrableOn_iff_comap_subtypeVal (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ (↑) : s → E) (μ.comap (↑)) := by
rw [← (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableOn_range_iff_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem integrableOn_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set β} : IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, e.restrict_map, integrable_map_equiv e]
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
(h₁.restrict_preimage_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_image [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (e '' s) ν ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) s μ :=
((h₁.restrict_image_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂).symm
theorem integrable_indicator_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm,
enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, lintegral_indicator hs,
aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs]
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
(integrable_indicator_iff hs).2 h
@[fun_prop]
theorem Integrable.indicator (h : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
h.integrableOn.integrable_indicator hs
theorem IntegrableOn.indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
IntegrableOn (indicator t f) s μ :=
Integrable.indicator h ht
theorem integrable_indicatorConstLp {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
Integrable (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) μ := by
rw [integrable_congr indicatorConstLp_coeFn, integrable_indicator_iff hs, IntegrableOn,
integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict]
exact .inr hμs
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and nonzero there, then the measurable hull of `s` is
well behaved: the restriction of the measure to `toMeasurable μ s` coincides with its restriction
to `s`. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict_toMeasurable (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (h's : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩
let v n := toMeasurable (μ.restrict s) { x | u n ≤ ‖f x‖ }
have A : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ v n) ≠ ∞ := by
intro n
rw [inter_comm, ← Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_toMeasurable]
exact (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top (u_pos n)).ne
apply Measure.restrict_toMeasurable_of_cover _ A
intro x hx
have : 0 < ‖f x‖ := by simp only [h's x hx, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < ‖f x‖ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ this).exists
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, subset_toMeasurable _ _ hn.le⟩
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is null-measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_ae_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t \ s → f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ := by
let u := { x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0 }
have hu : IntegrableOn f u μ := hf.mono_set fun x hx => hx.1
let v := toMeasurable μ u
have A : IntegrableOn f v μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, hu.restrict_toMeasurable]
· exact hu
· intro x hx; exact hx.2
have B : IntegrableOn f (t \ v) μ := by
apply integrableOn_zero.congr
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_of_ae h't,
ae_restrict_mem₀ (ht.diff (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ u).nullMeasurableSet)] with x hxt hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s
· by_contra H
exact hx.2 (subset_toMeasurable μ u ⟨h'x, Ne.symm H⟩)
· exact (hxt ⟨hx.1, h'x⟩).symm
apply (A.union B).mono_set _
rw [union_diff_self]
exact subset_union_right
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_forall_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : ∀ x ∈ t \ s, f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero ht.nullMeasurableSet (Eventually.of_forall h't)
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes almost everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← integrableOn_univ]
apply hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero nullMeasurableSet_univ
filter_upwards [h't] with x hx h'x using hx h'x.2
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ :=
hf.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => h't x hx)
theorem integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (h1s : support f ⊆ s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.integrableOn⟩
refine h.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_
contrapose! hx
exact h1s (mem_support.2 hx)
theorem integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(f : Lp E p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
refine memLp_one_iff_integrable.mp ?_
have hμ_restrict_univ : (μ.restrict s) Set.univ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
haveI hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨hμ_restrict_univ⟩
exact ((Lp.memLp _).restrict s).mono_exponent hp
theorem Integrable.lintegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
calc
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ↑‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_enorm f
_ < ∞ := hf.2
theorem IntegrableOn.setLIntegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
(∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
Integrable.lintegral_lt_top hf
/-- We say that a function `f` is *integrable at filter* `l` if it is integrable on some
set `s ∈ l`. Equivalently, it is eventually integrable on `s` in `l.smallSets`. -/
def IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → ε) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, IntegrableOn f s μ
variable {l l' : Filter α}
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableAtFilter, he.integrableOn_map_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
· exact ⟨_, hs⟩
· exact ⟨e '' s, by rwa [mem_map, he.injective.preimage_image]⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableAtFilter_map_iff, IntegrableAtFilter, he.map_comap]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs, int⟩
· exact ⟨s, hs, int.mono_measure <| μ.restrict_le_self⟩
· exact ⟨_, inter_mem hs range_mem_map, int.inter_of_restrict⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableAtFilter (h : Integrable f μ) (l : Filter α) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, Filter.univ_mem, integrableOn_univ.2 h⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.eventually (h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, IntegrableOn f s μ :=
Iff.mpr (eventually_smallSets' fun _s _t hst ht => ht.mono_set hst) h
theorem integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≥ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, hs, hi⟩ ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, ha⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hs
exact ⟨t, hi.mono_set fun _ hx ↦ ht _ hx⟩
theorem integrableAtFilter_atTop_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≤ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.add {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f + g) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
rcases hg with ⟨t, tl, ht⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ t, inter_mem sl tl, ?_⟩
exact (hs.mono_set inter_subset_left).add (ht.mono_set inter_subset_right)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.neg {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (-f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.neg⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sub {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f - g) l μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (c : 𝕜) :
IntegrableAtFilter (c • f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.smul c⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.norm (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (fun x => ‖f x‖) l μ :=
Exists.casesOn hf fun s hs ↦ ⟨s, hs.1, hs.2.norm⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.filter_mono (hl : l ≤ l') (hl' : IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
let ⟨s, hs, hsf⟩ := hl'
⟨s, hl hs, hsf⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_left (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ l') μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_right (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l' ⊓ l) μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_right
@[simp]
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff {l : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ ae μ) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, ht, u, hu, rfl⟩, hf⟩
refine ⟨t, ht, hf.congr_set_ae <| eventuallyEq_set.2 ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hu] with x hx using (and_iff_left hx).symm
alias ⟨IntegrableAtFilter.of_inf_ae, _⟩ := IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrableAtFilter_top : IntegrableAtFilter f ⊤ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.integrableAtFilter ⊤⟩
obtain ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := h
exact (integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset fun _ _ ↦ hsf _).mp hs
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff {l l' : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊔ l') μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ := by
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨h.filter_mono le_sup_left, h.filter_mono le_sup_right⟩
· exact fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, ⟨t, htl, ht⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨s ∪ t, union_mem_sup hsl htl, hs.union ht⟩
/-- If `μ` is a measure finite at filter `l` and `f` is a function such that its norm is bounded
above at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter {l : Filter α} [IsMeasurablyGenerated l]
(hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l)
(hf : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (norm ∘ f)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
hf.imp fun C hC => eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨_, hC, fun t => id⟩
rcases (hfm.eventually.and (hμ.eventually.and hC)).exists_measurable_mem_of_smallSets with
⟨s, hsl, hsm, hfm, hμ, hC⟩
refine ⟨s, hsl, ⟨hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded hμ (C := C) ?_⟩⟩
rw [ae_restrict_eq hsm, eventually_inf_principal]
exact Eventually.of_forall hC
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f (l ⊓ ae μ) (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
(hμ.inf_of_left.integrableAtFilter (hfm.filter_mono inf_le_left)
hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le).of_inf_ae
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter_ae :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
hμ.integrableAtFilter hfm hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto
lemma Measure.integrableOn_of_bounded (s_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (f_mble : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{M : ℝ} (f_bdd : ∀ᵐ a ∂(μ.restrict s), ‖f a‖ ≤ M) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
⟨f_mble.restrict, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded (C := M) s_finite.lt_top f_bdd⟩
theorem integrable_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator hf.measurableSet_support
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator hg.measurableSet_support
/-- If a function converges along a filter to a limit `a`, is integrable along this filter, and
all elements of the filter have infinite measure, then the limit has to vanish. -/
lemma IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto
(h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (h' : ∀ s ∈ l, μ s = ∞) {a : E}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : a = 0 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε ∧ ε < ‖a‖ := exists_between (norm_pos_iff.mpr H)
rcases h with ⟨u, ul, hu⟩
let v := u ∩ {b | ε < ‖f b‖}
have hv : IntegrableOn f v μ := hu.mono_set inter_subset_left
have vl : v ∈ l := inter_mem ul ((tendsto_order.1 hf.norm).1 _ hε)
have : μ.restrict v v < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right)
(Integrable.measure_gt_lt_top hv.norm εpos)
have : μ v ≠ ∞ := ne_of_lt (by simpa only [Measure.restrict_apply_self])
exact this (h' v vl)
end NormedAddCommGroup
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere measurable with respect to
`μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aemeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
nontriviality α; inhabit α
have : (Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default) =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
refine ⟨Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default, ?_, this.symm⟩
apply measurable_of_isOpen
intro t ht
obtain ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩ : ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
_root_.continuousOn_iff'.1 hf t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage, Set.ite, hu]
exact (u_open.measurableSet.inter hs).union ((measurable_const ht.measurableSet).diff hs)
/-- A function which is continuous on a separable set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, hf.isSeparable_image h's, ?_⟩
exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable with
respect to `μ.restrict s` when either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
borelize β
refine
aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.2
⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, ?_,
mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)⟩
cases h.out
· rw [image_eq_range]
exact isSeparable_range <| continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf
· exact .of_separableSpace _
/-- A function which is continuous on a compact set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsCompact s) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable h's, f '' s, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isSeparable
· exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict h's) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
{a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter
⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable ht h't⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin [TopologicalSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter ⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable ht⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem Continuous.integrableAt_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α E]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E}
(hf : Continuous f) (a : α) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 a) μ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
exact hf.continuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin MeasurableSet.univ (mem_univ a)
/-- If a function is continuous on an open set `s`, then it is strongly measurable at the filter
`𝓝 x` for all `x ∈ s` if either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ := fun _x hx =>
⟨s, IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs.measurableSet⟩
theorem ContinuousAt.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) : ∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ :=
ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter hs <| continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt hf
theorem Continuous.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter α) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
/-- If a function is continuous on a measurable set `s`, then it is measurable at the filter
`𝓝[s] x` for all `x`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_nhdsWithin {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (x : α) :
StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ :=
⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about adding and removing interval boundaries
The primed lemmas take explicit arguments about the measure being finite at the endpoint, while
the unprimed ones use `[NoAtoms μ]`.
-/
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → E} {μ : Measure α} {a b : α}
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· rw [← Ioc_union_left hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr ha.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Icc_eq_empty hab, Ioc_eq_empty]
contrapose! hab
exact hab.le
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· rw [← Ico_union_right hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Icc_eq_empty hab, Ico_eq_empty]
contrapose! hab
exact hab.le
theorem integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· rw [← Ioo_union_left hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr ha.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty hab, Ico_eq_empty hab]
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· rw [← Ioo_union_right hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty hab, Ioc_eq_empty hab]
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' ha, integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' hb]
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ici b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi b) μ := by
rw [← Ioi_union_left, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableOn_Iio' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Iio b) μ := by
rw [← Iio_union_right, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc, integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo]
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi :
IntegrableOn f (Ici b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi b) μ :=
integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableOn_Iio :
IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Iio b) μ :=
integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableOn_Iio' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
end PartialOrder
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegrableOn.lean | 749 | 752 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.LinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.ContinuousFunctions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-! # `L^2` space
If `E` is an inner product space over `𝕜` (`ℝ` or `ℂ`), then `Lp E 2 μ`
(defined in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace`)
is also an inner product space, with inner product defined as `inner f g = ∫ a, ⟪f a, g a⟫ ∂μ`.
### Main results
* `mem_L1_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product `fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫`
belongs to `Lp 𝕜 1 μ`.
* `integrable_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product
`fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫` is integrable.
* `L2.innerProductSpace` : `Lp E 2 μ` is an inner product space.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {α F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem MemLp.integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (h : MemLp f 2 μ) : Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
simpa [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] using h.norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
| alias Memℒp.integrable_sq := MemLp.integrable_sq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L2Space.lean | 42 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp_assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
end Zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg [NegZeroClass R] {M : Matrix m m R}
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => by rw [neg_apply, hM h, neg_zero]
theorem BlockTriangular.add [AddZeroClass R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
|
theorem BlockTriangular.sub [SubNegZeroMonoid R]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 91 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Semicontinuous maps
A function `f` from a topological space `α` to an ordered space `β` is lower semicontinuous at a
point `x` if, for any `y < f x`, for any `x'` close enough to `x`, one has `f x' > y`. In other
words, `f` can jump up, but it can not jump down.
Upper semicontinuous functions are defined similarly.
This file introduces these notions, and a basic API around them mimicking the API for continuous
functions.
## Main definitions and results
We introduce 4 definitions related to lower semicontinuity:
* `LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousAt f x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousOn f s`
* `LowerSemicontinuous f`
We build a basic API using dot notation around these notions, and we prove that
* constant functions are lower semicontinuous;
* `indicator s (fun _ ↦ y)` is lower semicontinuous when `s` is open and `0 ≤ y`,
or when `s` is closed and `y ≤ 0`;
* continuous functions are lower semicontinuous;
* left composition with a continuous monotone functions maps lower semicontinuous functions to lower
semicontinuous functions. If the function is anti-monotone, it instead maps lower semicontinuous
functions to upper semicontinuous functions;
* right composition with continuous functions preserves lower and upper semicontinuity;
* a sum of two (or finitely many) lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* a supremum of a family of lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* An infinite sum of `ℝ≥0∞`-valued lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous.
Similar results are stated and proved for upper semicontinuity.
We also prove that a function is continuous if and only if it is both lower and upper
semicontinuous.
We have some equivalent definitions of lower- and upper-semicontinuity (under certain
restrictions on the order on the codomain):
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf` in a dense complete linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph` in a dense complete linear order with the order
topology.
## Implementation details
All the nontrivial results for upper semicontinuous functions are deduced from the corresponding
ones for lower semicontinuous functions using `OrderDual`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_convex_function>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-continuity>
-/
open Topology ENNReal
open Set Function Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} {x : α}
{s t : Set α} {y z : β}
/-! ### Main definitions -/
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in
a general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, LowerSemicontinuousAt f x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a
general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'`
close enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered
space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, UpperSemicontinuousAt f x
/-!
### Lower semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for lower semicontinuity -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, LowerSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : LowerSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousOn, LowerSemicontinuous, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_const : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_const : LowerSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz.trans_le hy, hz]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz, hz.trans_le hy]
· filter_upwards [hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
end
/-! #### Relationship with continuity -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) := by
rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Iic]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem Continuous.lowerSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : LowerSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt
end
/-! #### Equivalent definitions -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
constructor
· intro hf; unfold LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt at hf
contrapose! hf
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between hf; use y
exact ⟨ylt, fun h => lty.not_le
(le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (h.mono fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx))⟩
exact fun hf y ylt => eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (ylt.trans_le hf)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf,
← nhdsWithin_univ]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuous]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuousOn]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousOn.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | f p.1 ≤ p.2} := by
constructor
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf, isClosed_iff_forall_filter]
rintro hf ⟨x, y⟩ F F_ne h h'
rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod] at h'
calc f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := hf x
_ ≤ liminf f (map Prod.fst F) := liminf_le_liminf_of_le h'.1
_ = liminf (f ∘ Prod.fst) F := (Filter.liminf_comp _ _ _).symm
_ ≤ liminf Prod.snd F := liminf_le_liminf <| by
simpa using (eventually_principal.2 fun (_ : α × γ) ↦ id).filter_mono h
_ = y := h'.2.liminf_eq
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage]
exact fun hf y ↦ hf.preimage (.prodMk_left y)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_epigraph, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph
end
/-! ### Composition -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
intro y hy
by_cases h : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z, zlt, hz⟩ : ∃ z < f x, Ioc z (f x) ⊆ g ⁻¹' Ioi y :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (hg (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)) h
filter_upwards [hf z zlt] with a ha
calc
y < g (min (f x) (f a)) := hz (by simp [zlt, ha, le_refl])
_ ≤ g (f a) := gmon (min_le_right _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at h
exact Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun a => hy.trans_le (gmon (h (f a)))
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hg.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
/-! #### Addition -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid γ] [LinearOrder γ] [IsOrderedAddMonoid γ]
[TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, xu, v_open, xv, h⟩ :
∃ u v : Set γ,
IsOpen u ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ g x ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ { p : γ × γ | y < p.fst + p.snd } :=
mem_nhds_prod_iff'.1 (hcont (isOpen_Ioi.mem_nhds hy))
by_cases hx₁ : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z₁, z₁lt, h₁⟩ : ∃ z₁ < f x, Ioc z₁ (f x) ⊆ u :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu) hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt, hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₁z h₂z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, A2⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt] with z h₁z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, xv⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (hx₂ (g z))
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₂z
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H] using h₂ ⟨z₂lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (f x, min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, A2⟩
calc
y < f x + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁ hx₂
apply Filter.Eventually.of_forall
intro z
have : (f x, g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, xv⟩
calc
y < f x + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (hx₂ (g z))
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x := by
classical
induction a using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
| insert _ _ ia IH =>
simp only [ia, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add (ha _ (Finset.mem_insert_self ..))
(IH fun j ja => ha j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ja))
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z :=
fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x
end
/-! #### Supremum -/
section
variable {ι : Sort*} {δ δ' : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder δ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder δ']
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simpa only [iSup_of_empty'] using lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
· intro y hy
rcases exists_lt_of_lt_ciSup hy with ⟨i, hi⟩
filter_upwards [h i y hi, bdd] with y hy hy' using hy.trans_le (le_ciSup hy' i)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i hi) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at bdd
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup bdd h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i hi) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ x ∈ s, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i hi) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'} (bdd : ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' := fun x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (Eventually.of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuous (f i hi)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun hi => h i hi
end
/-! #### Infinite sums -/
section
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s x := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
refine lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun b => ?_
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i _hi => h i
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ∑' i, f i x' := fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum fun i => h i x
end
/-!
### Upper semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for upper semicontinuity -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt, UpperSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : UpperSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ UpperSemicontinuous f := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousOn, UpperSemicontinuous, upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousOn (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_const : UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_const : UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem upperSemicontinuous_const : UpperSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
upperSemicontinuousAt_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) :=
@IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator α _ βᵒᵈ _ s y _ hs hy
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) :=
@IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator α _ βᵒᵈ _ s y _ hs hy
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
end
/-! #### Relationship with continuity -/
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Iio y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Iio y) :=
upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Ici y) := by
rw [upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Ici]
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Ici y) :=
upperSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Iio_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousAt.upperSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Iio_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousOn.upperSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem Continuous.upperSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : UpperSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.upperSemicontinuousAt
end
/-! #### Equivalent definitions -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ limsup f (𝓝[s] x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ limsup f (𝓝 x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousAt.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousAt_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, limsup f (𝓝 x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuous.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuous_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, limsup f (𝓝[s] x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousOn.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousOn_iff_limsup_le
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_IsClosed_hypograph {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | p.2 ≤ f p.1} :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuous.IsClosed_hypograph, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuous_iff_IsClosed_hypograph
end
/-! ### Composition -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γᵒᵈ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon.dual
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γᵒᵈ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon.dual
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : UpperSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
/-! #### Addition -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid γ] [LinearOrder γ] [IsOrderedAddMonoid γ]
[TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf hg hcont
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousAt g x) : UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousOn g s) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuous g) : UpperSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum (γ := γᵒᵈ) ha
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by
simp_rw [← upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s := fun x hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x hx
theorem upperSemicontinuous_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuous (f i)) : UpperSemicontinuous fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z :=
fun x => upperSemicontinuousAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x
end
/-! #### Infimum -/
section
variable {ι : Sort*} {δ δ' : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder δ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder δ']
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciInf {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, BddBelow (range fun i => f i y))
(h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s x :=
@lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup α _ x s ι δ'ᵒᵈ _ f bdd h
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iInf {f : ι → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s x :=
| @lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup α _ x s ι δᵒᵈ _ f h
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i hi) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s x :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Semicontinuous.lean | 1,015 | 1,019 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Types.Coyoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Center
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Enriched categories
We set up the basic theory of `V`-enriched categories,
for `V` an arbitrary monoidal category.
We do not assume here that `V` is a concrete category,
so there does not need to be an "honest" underlying category!
Use `X ⟶[V] Y` to obtain the `V` object of morphisms from `X` to `Y`.
This file contains the definitions of `V`-enriched categories and
`V`-functors.
We don't yet define the `V`-object of natural transformations
between a pair of `V`-functors (this requires limits in `V`),
but we do provide a presheaf isomorphic to the Yoneda embedding of this object.
We verify that when `V = Type v`, all these notion reduce to the usual ones.
-/
universe w w' v v' u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite
open MonoidalCategory
variable (V : Type v) [Category.{w} V] [MonoidalCategory V]
/-- A `V`-category is a category enriched in a monoidal category `V`.
Note that we do not assume that `V` is a concrete category,
so there may not be an "honest" underlying category at all!
-/
class EnrichedCategory (C : Type u₁) where
/-- `X ⟶[V] Y` is the `V` object of morphisms from `X` to `Y`. -/
Hom : C → C → V
/-- The identity morphism of this catgeory -/
id (X : C) : 𝟙_ V ⟶ Hom X X
/-- Composition of two morphisms in this category -/
comp (X Y Z : C) : Hom X Y ⊗ Hom Y Z ⟶ Hom X Z
id_comp (X Y : C) : (λ_ (Hom X Y)).inv ≫ id X ▷ _ ≫ comp X X Y = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp_id (X Y : C) : (ρ_ (Hom X Y)).inv ≫ _ ◁ id Y ≫ comp X Y Y = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
assoc (W X Y Z : C) : (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ comp W X Y ▷ _ ≫ comp W Y Z =
_ ◁ comp X Y Z ≫ comp W X Z := by aesop_cat
@[inherit_doc EnrichedCategory.Hom] notation X " ⟶[" V "] " Y:10 => (EnrichedCategory.Hom X Y : V)
variable {C : Type u₁} [EnrichedCategory V C]
/-- The `𝟙_ V`-shaped generalized element giving the identity in a `V`-enriched category.
-/
def eId (X : C) : 𝟙_ V ⟶ X ⟶[V] X :=
EnrichedCategory.id X
/-- The composition `V`-morphism for a `V`-enriched category.
-/
def eComp (X Y Z : C) : ((X ⟶[V] Y) ⊗ Y ⟶[V] Z) ⟶ X ⟶[V] Z :=
EnrichedCategory.comp X Y Z
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem e_id_comp (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⟶[V] Y)).inv ≫ eId V X ▷ _ ≫ eComp V X X Y = 𝟙 (X ⟶[V] Y) :=
EnrichedCategory.id_comp X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem e_comp_id (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⟶[V] Y)).inv ≫ _ ◁ eId V Y ≫ eComp V X Y Y = 𝟙 (X ⟶[V] Y) :=
EnrichedCategory.comp_id X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem e_assoc (W X Y Z : C) :
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ eComp V W X Y ▷ _ ≫ eComp V W Y Z =
_ ◁ eComp V X Y Z ≫ eComp V W X Z :=
EnrichedCategory.assoc W X Y Z
@[reassoc]
theorem e_assoc' (W X Y Z : C) :
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ eComp V X Y Z ≫ eComp V W X Z =
eComp V W X Y ▷ _ ≫ eComp V W Y Z := by
rw [← e_assoc V W X Y Z, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
section
|
variable {V} {W : Type v'} [Category.{w'} W] [MonoidalCategory W]
/-- A type synonym for `C`, which should come equipped with a `V`-enriched category structure.
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Enriched/Basic.lean | 98 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Retract
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
/-!
# Quasi-isomorphisms
A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism if it induces isomorphisms on homology.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
universe v u
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
{c : ComplexShape ι} {K L M K' L' : HomologicalComplex C c}
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism in degree `i`
when it induces a quasi-isomorphism of short complexes `K.sc i ⟶ L.sc i`. -/
class QuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] : Prop where
quasiIso : ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact h.quasiIso
· intro h
exact ⟨h⟩
instance quasiIsoAt_of_isIso (f : K ⟶ L) [IsIso f] (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
infer_instance
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff' (f : K ⟶ L) (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [(K.sc' i j k).HasHomology] [(L.sc' i j k).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f j ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).map f) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso _ _
(Arrow.isoOfNatIso (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) (Arrow.mk f))
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_retract {f : K ⟶ L} {f' : K' ⟶ L'}
(h : RetractArrow f f') (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[K'.HasHomology i] [L'.HasHomology i] [hf' : QuasiIsoAt f' i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hf' ⊢
have : RetractArrow ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f') := h.map (shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapArrow
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_of_retract this
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff]
rfl
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hK : K.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ L.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hK ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hK (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h).symm
· intro hL
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hL : L.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ K.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hL ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hL (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h)
· intro hK
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma exactAt_iff_of_quasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [QuasiIsoAt f i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ L.ExactAt i :=
⟨fun hK => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt f i hK).1 inferInstance,
fun hL => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' f i hL).1 inferInstance⟩
instance (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [hf : QuasiIsoAt f i] :
IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
simpa only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff] using hf
/-- The isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ L.homology i` induced by a morphism `f : K ⟶ L` such
that `[QuasiIsoAt f i]` holds. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoOfQuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] : K.homology i ≅ L.homology i :=
asIso (homologyMap f i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_hom_inv_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
homologyMap f i ≫ (isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_inv_hom_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv ≫ homologyMap f i = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv_hom_id
lemma CochainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : CochainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 0 0 1).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
lemma ChainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : ChainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 1 0 0).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism when it
is so in every degree, i.e. when the induced maps `homologyMap f i : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i`
are all isomorphisms (see `quasiIso_iff` and `quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap`). -/
class QuasiIso (f : K ⟶ L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] : Prop where
quasiIsoAt : ∀ i, QuasiIsoAt f i := by infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff (f : K ⟶ L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiIsoAt f i :=
⟨fun h => h.quasiIsoAt, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
attribute [instance] QuasiIso.quasiIsoAt
instance quasiIso_of_isIso (f : K ⟶ L) [IsIso f] [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso f where
instance quasiIsoAt_comp (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] [hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hφ hφ' ⊢
rw [Functor.map_comp]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_comp _ _
instance quasiIso_comp (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') where
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] [hφφ' : QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i] :
QuasiIsoAt φ' i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap] at hφ hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left (homologyMap φ i) (homologyMap φ' i)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ' i := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIsoAt_of_comp_left φ φ' i
· intro
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ' := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_left φ φ']
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ' := by
rw [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left φ φ']
infer_instance
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] [hφφ' : QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i] :
QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap] at hφ' hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right (homologyMap φ i) (homologyMap φ' i)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIsoAt_of_comp_right φ φ' i
· intro
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_right φ φ']
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ'] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ := by
rw [← quasiIso_iff_comp_right φ φ']
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : K' ⟶ L') (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ')
[∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso φ ↔ QuasiIso φ' := by
simp [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left (show K' ⟶ K from e.inv.left) φ,
← quasiIso_iff_comp_right φ' (show L' ⟶ L from e.inv.right)]
lemma quasiIso_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : K' ⟶ L') (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ')
[∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] : QuasiIso φ' := by
simpa only [← quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso φ φ' e]
lemma quasiIso_of_retractArrow {f : K ⟶ L} {f' : K' ⟶ L'}
(h : RetractArrow f f') [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i] [QuasiIso f'] :
QuasiIso f where
quasiIsoAt i := quasiIsoAt_of_retract h i
namespace HomologicalComplex
section PreservesHomology
variable {C₁ C₂ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Preadditive C₁] [Preadditive C₂]
{K L : HomologicalComplex C₁ c} (φ : K ⟶ L) (F : C₁ ⥤ C₂) [F.Additive]
[F.PreservesHomology]
section
variable (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj K).HasHomology i]
[((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj L).HasHomology i]
instance quasiIsoAt_map_of_preservesHomology [hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] :
QuasiIsoAt ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hφ ⊢
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_map_of_preservesLeftHomology F
((shortComplexFunctor C₁ c i).map φ)
lemma quasiIsoAt_map_iff_of_preservesHomology [F.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
QuasiIsoAt ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_map_iff_of_preservesLeftHomology F
((shortComplexFunctor C₁ c i).map φ)
end
section
variable [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj K).HasHomology i]
[∀ i, ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj L).HasHomology i]
instance quasiIso_map_of_preservesHomology [hφ : QuasiIso φ] :
QuasiIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) where
lemma quasiIso_map_iff_of_preservesHomology [F.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
QuasiIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) ↔ QuasiIso φ := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_map_iff_of_preservesHomology φ F]
end
end PreservesHomology
variable (C c)
/-- The morphism property on `HomologicalComplex C c` given by quasi-isomorphisms. -/
def quasiIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
MorphismProperty (HomologicalComplex C c) := fun _ _ f => QuasiIso f
variable {C c} [CategoryWithHomology C]
@[simp]
lemma mem_quasiIso_iff (f : K ⟶ L) : quasiIso C c f ↔ QuasiIso f := by rfl
instance : (quasiIso C c).IsMultiplicative where
id_mem _ := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff]
infer_instance
comp_mem _ _ hf hg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf hg ⊢
infer_instance
instance : (quasiIso C c).HasTwoOutOfThreeProperty where
of_postcomp f g hg hfg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hg hfg ⊢
rwa [← quasiIso_iff_comp_right f g]
of_precomp f g hf hfg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf hfg ⊢
rwa [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left f g]
instance : (quasiIso C c).IsStableUnderRetracts where
of_retract h hg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hg ⊢
exact quasiIso_of_retractArrow h
instance : (quasiIso C c).RespectsIso :=
MorphismProperty.respectsIso_of_isStableUnderComposition
(fun _ _ _ (_ : IsIso _) ↦ by rw [mem_quasiIso_iff]; infer_instance)
end HomologicalComplex
end
section
variable {ι : Type*} {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
{c : ComplexShape ι} {K L : HomologicalComplex C c}
(e : HomotopyEquiv K L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
instance : QuasiIso e.hom where
quasiIsoAt n := by
classical
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap]
exact (e.toHomologyIso n).isIso_hom
instance : QuasiIso e.inv := (inferInstance : QuasiIso e.symm.hom)
variable (C c)
lemma homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homotopyEquivalences C c ≤ quasiIso C c := by
rintro K L _ ⟨e, rfl⟩
simp only [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff]
infer_instance
end
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/QuasiIso.lean | 393 | 397 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alex J. Best. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Ring theoretic facts about `ZMod n`
We collect a few facts about `ZMod n` that need some ring theory to be proved/stated.
## Main statements
* `ZMod.ker_intCastRingHom`: the ring homomorphism `ℤ → ZMod n` has kernel generated by `n`.
* `ZMod.ringHom_eq_of_ker_eq`: two ring homomorphisms into `ZMod n` with equal kernels are equal.
* `isReduced_zmod`: `ZMod n` is reduced for all squarefree `n`.
-/
/-- The ring homomorphism `ℤ → ZMod n` has kernel generated by `n`. -/
theorem ZMod.ker_intCastRingHom (n : ℕ) :
RingHom.ker (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n)) = Ideal.span ({(n : ℤ)} : Set ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, RingHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castRingHom,
ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
/-- Two ring homomorphisms into `ZMod n` with equal kernels are equal. -/
theorem ZMod.ringHom_eq_of_ker_eq {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f g : R →+* ZMod n)
(h : RingHom.ker f = RingHom.ker g) : f = g := by
have := f.liftOfRightInverse_comp _ (ZMod.ringHom_rightInverse f) ⟨g, le_of_eq h⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk] at this
rw [← this, RingHom.ext_zmod (f.liftOfRightInverse _ _ ⟨g, _⟩) _, RingHom.id_comp]
/-- `ZMod n` is reduced iff `n` is square-free (or `n=0`). -/
@[simp]
theorem isReduced_zmod {n : ℕ} : IsReduced (ZMod n) ↔ Squarefree n ∨ n = 0 := by
rw [← RingHom.ker_isRadical_iff_reduced_of_surjective
| (ZMod.ringHom_surjective <| Int.castRingHom <| ZMod n),
ZMod.ker_intCastRingHom, ← isRadical_iff_span_singleton, isRadical_iff_squarefree_or_zero,
Int.squarefree_natCast, Nat.cast_eq_zero]
instance {n : ℕ} [Fact <| Squarefree n] : IsReduced (ZMod n) :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ZMod.lean | 42 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Cyclotomic extensions
Let `A` and `B` be commutative rings with `Algebra A B`. For `S : Set ℕ+`, we define a class
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` expressing the fact that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th
primitive roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` : means that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th primitive
roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
* `CyclotomicField`: given `n : ℕ+` and a field `K`, we define `CyclotomicField n K` as the
splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`. If `n` is nonzero in `K`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K (CyclotomicField n K)`.
* `CyclotomicRing` : if `A` is a domain with fraction field `K` and `n : ℕ+`, we define
`CyclotomicRing n A K` as the `A`-subalgebra of `CyclotomicField n K` generated by the roots of
`X ^ n - 1`. If `n` is nonzero in `A`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A (CyclotomicRing n A K)`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` and
`IsCyclotomicExtension T B C`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C` if
`Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }) B`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension T A B` and `S ⊆ T`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 })`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.finite` : if `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then
`B` is a finite `A`-algebra.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField` : a finite cyclotomic extension of a number field is a
number field.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.isSplittingField_X_pow_sub_one` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `X ^ n - 1`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.splitting_field_cyclotomic` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `IsCyclotomicExtension` is very general, to allow rings of any characteristic
and infinite extensions, but it will mainly be used in the case `S = {n}` and for integral domains.
All results are in the `IsCyclotomicExtension` namespace.
Note that some results, for example `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finite`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.isGalois` and
`CyclotomicField.algebraBase` are lemmas, but they can be made local instances. Some of them are
included in the `Cyclotomic` locale.
-/
open Polynomial Algebra Module Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
/-- Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `S : Set ℕ+`, we define `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` requiring
that there is an `n`-th primitive root of unity in `B` for all `n ∈ S` and that `B` is generated
over `A` by the roots of `X ^ n - 1`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
/-- For all `n ∈ S`, there exists a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `B`. -/
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
/-- The `n`-th roots of unity, for `n ∈ S`, generate `B` as an `A`-algebra. -/
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` that uses `⊤`. -/
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` in the case `S` is a singleton. -/
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`. -/
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
variable (A B)
/-- Transitivity of cyclotomic extensions. -/
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· rcases hn with hn | hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (hx := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy)
fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← map_pow, hn.2, map_one]⟩⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `S ∪ T`, then `B`
is a cyclotomic extension of `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` given by
roots of unity of order in `T`. -/
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `T` and `S ⊆ T`,
then `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` is a cyclotomic extension of `B`
given by roots of unity of order in `S`. -/
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
variable {n S}
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` implies
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` if and only if
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
variable (n S)
/-- `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` is equivalent to `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
/-- If `Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B :=
singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (surjective_algebraMap_iff.1 h).symm
variable (A B)
/-- Given `(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C)`, if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A C`. -/
protected
theorem equiv {C : Type*} [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B]
(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) : IsCyclotomicExtension S A C := by
letI : Algebra B C := f.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} B C := singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective f.surjective
haveI : IsScalarTower A B C := IsScalarTower.of_algHom f.toAlgHom
exact (iff_union_singleton_one _ _ _).2 (trans S {1} A B C f.injective)
protected
theorem neZero [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] [IsDomain B] : NeZero ((n : ℕ) : B) := by
obtain ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, -⟩ := (iff_singleton n A B).1 h
exact hr.neZero'
protected
theorem neZero' [IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] [IsDomain B] : NeZero ((n : ℕ) : A) := by
haveI := IsCyclotomicExtension.neZero n A B
exact NeZero.nat_of_neZero (algebraMap A B)
end Basic
section Fintype
theorem finite_of_singleton [IsDomain B] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] :
Module.Finite A B := by
classical
rw [Module.finite_def, ← top_toSubmodule, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).1 h).2]
refine fg_adjoin_of_finite ?_ fun b hb => ?_
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
have : {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = (nthRoots n (1 : B)).toFinset :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using h, fun h => by simpa using h⟩
rw [this]
exact (nthRoots (↑n) 1).toFinset.finite_toSet
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left, mem_setOf_eq] at hb
exact ⟨X ^ (n : ℕ) - 1, ⟨monic_X_pow_sub_C _ n.pos.ne.symm, by simp [hb]⟩⟩
| /-- If `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then `B` is a finite `A`-algebra. -/
protected theorem finite [IsDomain B] [h₁ : Finite S] [h₂ : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
Module.Finite A B := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 297 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.Lie
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.DerivationBundle
/-!
# Left invariant derivations
In this file we define the concept of left invariant derivation for a Lie group. The concept is
analogous to the more classical concept of left invariant vector fields, and it holds that the
derivation associated to a vector field is left invariant iff the field is.
Moreover we prove that `LeftInvariantDerivation I G` has the structure of a Lie algebra, hence
implementing one of the possible definitions of the Lie algebra attached to a Lie group.
Note that one can also define a Lie algebra on the space of left-invariant vector fields
(see `instLieAlgebraGroupLieAlgebra`). For finite-dimensional `C^∞` real manifolds, the space of
derivations can be canonically identified with the tangent space, and we recover the same Lie
algebra structure (TODO: prove this). In other smoothness classes or on other
fields, this identification is not always true, though, so the derivations point of view does not
work in these settings. The left-invariant vector fields should
therefore be favored to construct a theory of Lie groups in suitable generality.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped LieGroup Manifold Derivation ContDiff
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Monoid G] [ContMDiffMul I ∞ G] (g h : G)
-- Generate trivial has_sizeof instance. It prevents weird type class inference timeout problems
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12096): removed @[nolint instance_priority], linter not ported yet
-- @[local nolint instance_priority, local instance 10000]
-- private def disable_has_sizeof {α} : SizeOf α :=
-- ⟨fun _ => 0⟩
/-- Left-invariant global derivations.
A global derivation is left-invariant if it is equal to its pullback along left multiplication by
an arbitrary element of `G`.
-/
structure LeftInvariantDerivation extends Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ where
left_invariant'' :
∀ g, 𝒅ₕ (smoothLeftMul_one I g) (Derivation.evalAt 1 toDerivation) =
Derivation.evalAt g toDerivation
variable {I G}
namespace LeftInvariantDerivation
instance : Coe (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) (Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) :=
| ⟨toDerivation⟩
attribute [coe] toDerivation
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LeftInvariantDerivation.lean | 59 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : Fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives coefficients of a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : Fin 2 → Fin 2 → α`.
In later files we introduce `!![a, b; c, d]` as notation for `Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Main definitions
* `vecEmpty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vecCons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section MatrixNotation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α :=
Fin.elim0
/-- `vecCons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vecHead` and `vecTail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vecCons a (vecCons b ...)`.
-/
def vecCons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : Fin n → α) : Fin n.succ → α :=
Fin.cons h t
/-- `![...]` notation is used to construct a vector `Fin n → α` using `Matrix.vecEmpty` and
`Matrix.vecCons`.
For instance, `![a, b, c] : Fin 3` is syntax for `vecCons a (vecCons b (vecCons c vecEmpty))`.
Note that this should not be used as syntax for `Matrix` as it generates a term with the wrong type.
The `!![a, b; c, d]` syntax (provided by `Matrix.matrixNotation`) should be used instead.
-/
syntax (name := vecNotation) "![" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(![$term:term, $terms:term,*]) => `(vecCons $term ![$terms,*])
| `(![$term:term]) => `(vecCons $term ![])
| `(![]) => `(vecEmpty)
/-- Unexpander for the `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecCons]
def vecConsUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $term ![$term2, $terms,*]) => `(![$term, $term2, $terms,*])
| `($_ $term ![$term2]) => `(![$term, $term2])
| `($_ $term ![]) => `(![$term])
| _ => throw ()
/-- Unexpander for the `![]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecEmpty]
def vecEmptyUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_:ident) => `(![])
| _ => throw ()
/-- `vecHead v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vecHead {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
/-- `vecTail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vecTail {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : Fin n → α :=
v ∘ Fin.succ
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `Fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance _root_.PiFin.hasRepr [Repr α] : Repr (Fin n → α) where
reprPrec f _ :=
Std.Format.bracket "![" (Std.Format.joinSep
((List.finRange n).map fun n => repr (f n)) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
end MatrixNotation
variable {m n o : ℕ}
theorem empty_eq (v : Fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
section Val
@[simp]
theorem head_fin_const (a : α) : (vecHead fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u 0 = x :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (i : Fin m) : vecCons x u i.succ = u i := by
simp [vecCons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecCons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := by
simp only [vecCons, Fin.cons, Fin.cases_succ']
section simprocs
open Lean Qq
/-- Parses a chain of `Matrix.vecCons` calls into elements, leaving everything else in the tail.
`let ⟨xs, tailn, tail⟩ ← matchVecConsPrefix n e` decomposes `e : Fin n → _` in the form
`vecCons x₀ <| ... <| vecCons xₙ <| tail` where `tail : Fin tailn → _`. -/
partial def matchVecConsPrefix (n : Q(Nat)) (e : Expr) : MetaM <| List Expr × Q(Nat) × Expr := do
match_expr ← Meta.whnfR e with
| Matrix.vecCons _ n x xs => do
let (elems, n', tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix n xs
return (x :: elems, n', tail)
| _ =>
return ([], n, e)
open Qq in
/-- A simproc that handles terms of the form `Matrix.vecCons a f i` where `i` is a numeric literal.
In practice, this is most effective at handling `![a, b, c] i`-style terms. -/
dsimproc cons_val (Matrix.vecCons _ _ _) := fun e => do
let_expr Matrix.vecCons α en x xs' ei := ← Meta.whnfR e | return .continue
let some i := ei.int? | return .continue
let (xs, etailn, tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix en xs'
let xs := x :: xs
-- Determine if the tail is a numeral or only an offset.
let (tailn, variadic, etailn) ← do
let etailn_whnf : Q(ℕ) ← Meta.whnfD etailn
if let Expr.lit (.natVal length) := etailn_whnf then
pure (length, false, q(OfNat.ofNat $etailn_whnf))
else if let .some ((base : Q(ℕ)), offset) ← (Meta.isOffset? etailn_whnf).run then
let offset_e : Q(ℕ) := mkNatLit offset
pure (offset, true, q($base + $offset))
else
pure (0, true, etailn)
-- Wrap the index if possible, and abort if not
let wrapped_i ←
if variadic then
-- can't wrap as we don't know the length
unless 0 ≤ i ∧ i < xs.length + tailn do return .continue
pure i.toNat
else
pure (i % (xs.length + tailn)).toNat
if h : wrapped_i < xs.length then
return .continue xs[wrapped_i]
else
-- Within the `tail`
let _ ← synthInstanceQ q(NeZero $etailn)
have i_lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (wrapped_i - xs.length)
return .continue (.some <| .app tail q(OfNat.ofNat $i_lit : Fin $etailn))
end simprocs
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecHead (vecCons x u) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecTail (vecCons x u) = u := by
ext
simp [vecTail]
theorem empty_val' {n' : Type*} (j : n') : (fun i => (![] : Fin 0 → n' → α) i j) = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_head_tail (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons (vecHead u) (vecTail u) = u :=
Fin.cons_self_tail _
@[simp]
theorem range_cons (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) : Set.range (vecCons x u) = {x} ∪ Set.range u :=
Set.ext fun y => by simp [Fin.exists_fin_succ, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem range_empty (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range u = ∅ :=
Set.range_eq_empty _
theorem range_cons_empty (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : Set.range (Matrix.vecCons x u) = {x} := by
rw [range_cons, range_empty, Set.union_empty]
-- simp can prove this (up to commutativity)
theorem range_cons_cons_empty (x y : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) :
Set.range (vecCons x <| vecCons y u) = {x, y} := by
rw [range_cons, range_cons_empty, Set.singleton_union]
theorem vecCons_const (a : α) : (vecCons a fun _ : Fin n => a) = fun _ => a :=
funext <| Fin.forall_iff_succ.2 ⟨rfl, cons_val_succ _ _⟩
theorem vec_single_eq_const (a : α) : ![a] = fun _ => a :=
let _ : Unique (Fin 1) := inferInstance
funext <| Unique.forall_iff.2 rfl
/-- `![a, b, ...] 1` is equal to `b`.
The simplifier needs a special lemma for length `≥ 2`, in addition to
`cons_val_succ`, because `1 : Fin 1 = 0 : Fin 1`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_one (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ → α) : vecCons x u 1 = u 0 :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_two (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ → α) : vecCons x u 2 = vecHead (vecTail u) := rfl
lemma cons_val_three (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 3 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail u)) :=
rfl
lemma cons_val_four (x : α) (u : Fin m.succ.succ.succ.succ → α) :
vecCons x u 4 = vecHead (vecTail (vecTail (vecTail u))) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_fin_one (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : ∀ (i : Fin 1), vecCons x u i = x := by
rw [Fin.forall_fin_one]
rfl
theorem cons_fin_one (x : α) (u : Fin 0 → α) : vecCons x u = fun _ => x :=
funext (cons_val_fin_one x u)
open Lean Qq in
/-- `mkVecLiteralQ ![x, y, z]` produces the term `q(![$x, $y, $z])`. -/
def _root_.PiFin.mkLiteralQ {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {n : ℕ} (elems : Fin n → Q($α)) :
Q(Fin $n → $α) :=
loop 0 (Nat.zero_le _) q(vecEmpty)
where
loop (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n) (rest : Q(Fin $i → $α)) : let i' : Nat := i + 1; Q(Fin $(i') → $α) :=
if h : i < n then
loop (i + 1) h q(vecCons $(elems (Fin.rev ⟨i, h⟩)) $rest)
else
rest
attribute [nolint docBlame] _root_.PiFin.mkLiteralQ.loop
open Lean Qq in
protected instance _root_.PiFin.toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToExpr α] (n : ℕ) : ToExpr (Fin n → α) :=
have lu := toLevel.{u}
have eα : Q(Type $lu) := toTypeExpr α
let toTypeExpr := q(Fin $n → $eα)
{ toTypeExpr, toExpr v := PiFin.mkLiteralQ fun i => show Q($eα) from toExpr (v i) }
/-! ### `bit0` and `bit1` indices
The following definitions and `simp` lemmas are used to allow
numeral-indexed element of a vector given with matrix notation to
be extracted by `simp` in Lean 3 (even when the numeral is larger than the
number of elements in the vector, which is taken modulo that number
of elements by virtue of the semantics of `bit0` and `bit1` and of
addition on `Fin n`).
-/
/-- `vecAppend ho u v` appends two vectors of lengths `m` and `n` to produce
one of length `o = m + n`. This is a variant of `Fin.append` with an additional `ho` argument,
which provides control of definitional equality for the vector length.
This turns out to be helpful when providing simp lemmas to reduce `![a, b, c] n`, and also means
that `vecAppend ho u v 0` is valid. `Fin.append u v 0` is not valid in this case because there is
no `Zero (Fin (m + n))` instance. -/
def vecAppend {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o = m + n) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) : Fin o → α :=
Fin.append u v ∘ Fin.cast ho
theorem vecAppend_eq_ite {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o = m + n) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAppend ho u v = fun i : Fin o =>
if h : (i : ℕ) < m then u ⟨i, h⟩ else v ⟨(i : ℕ) - m, by omega⟩ := by
ext i
rw [vecAppend, Fin.append, Function.comp_apply, Fin.addCases]
congr with hi
simp only [eq_rec_constant]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecAppend_apply_zero {α : Type*} {o : ℕ} (ho : o + 1 = m + 1 + n) (u : Fin (m + 1) → α)
(v : Fin n → α) : vecAppend ho u v 0 = u 0 :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecAppend (v : Fin n → α) : vecAppend n.zero_add.symm ![] v = v := by
ext
simp [vecAppend_eq_ite]
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecAppend (ho : o + 1 = m + 1 + n) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAppend ho (vecCons x u) v = vecCons x (vecAppend (by omega) u v) := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecAppend_eq_ite]
split_ifs with h
· rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· simp
· simp only [Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right, Fin.val_mk] at h
simp [h]
· rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· simp at h
· rw [not_lt, Fin.val_mk, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right] at h
simp [h, not_lt.2 h]
/-- `vecAlt0 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (even-numbered). -/
def vecAlt0 (hm : m = n + n) (v : Fin m → α) (k : Fin n) : α := v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k, by omega⟩
/-- `vecAlt1 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (odd-numbered). -/
def vecAlt1 (hm : m = n + n) (v : Fin m → α) (k : Fin n) : α :=
v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k + 1, hm.symm ▸ Nat.add_succ_lt_add k.2 k.2⟩
section bits
theorem vecAlt0_vecAppend (v : Fin n → α) :
vecAlt0 rfl (vecAppend rfl v v) = v ∘ (fun n ↦ n + n) := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp, vecAlt0, vecAppend_eq_ite]
split_ifs with h <;> congr
· rw [Fin.val_mk] at h
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
· rw [Fin.val_mk, not_lt] at h
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_mk, Nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h]
refine (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt ?_).symm
omega
theorem vecAlt1_vecAppend (v : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
vecAlt1 rfl (vecAppend rfl v v) = v ∘ (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp, vecAlt1, vecAppend_eq_ite]
cases n with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := i
simp only [Nat.zero_add, Nat.lt_one_iff] at hi; subst i; rfl
| succ n =>
split_ifs with h <;> congr
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, h]
· rw [Fin.val_mk, not_lt] at h
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_mk, Nat.mod_add_mod, Fin.val_one,
Nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h, show 1 % (n + 2) = 1 from Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]
refine (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt ?_).symm
omega
@[simp]
theorem vecHead_vecAlt0 (hm : m + 2 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (v : Fin (m + 2) → α) :
vecHead (vecAlt0 hm v) = v 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecHead_vecAlt1 (hm : m + 2 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (v : Fin (m + 2) → α) :
vecHead (vecAlt1 hm v) = v 1 := by simp [vecHead, vecAlt1]
theorem cons_vec_bit0_eq_alt0 (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
vecCons x u (i + i) = vecAlt0 rfl (vecAppend rfl (vecCons x u) (vecCons x u)) i := by
rw [vecAlt0_vecAppend]; rfl
theorem cons_vec_bit1_eq_alt1 (x : α) (u : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
vecCons x u ((i + i) + 1) = vecAlt1 rfl (vecAppend rfl (vecCons x u) (vecCons x u)) i := by
rw [vecAlt1_vecAppend]; rfl
end bits
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecAlt0 (h : m + 1 + 1 = n + 1 + (n + 1)) (x y : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecAlt0 h (vecCons x (vecCons y u)) = vecCons x (vecAlt0 (by omega) u) := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecAlt0]
| rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩
· rfl
· simp only [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm, cons_val_succ',
cons_vecAppend, Nat.add_eq, vecAlt0]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecAlt0 (α) {h} : vecAlt0 h (![] : Fin 0 → α) = ![] := by
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/VecNotation.lean | 393 | 399 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Orientation
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Oriented two-dimensional real inner product spaces
This file defines constructions specific to the geometry of an oriented two-dimensional real inner
product space `E`.
## Main declarations
* `Orientation.areaForm`: an antisymmetric bilinear form `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` (usual notation `ω`).
Morally, when `ω` is evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram
they span. (But mathlib does not yet have a construction of oriented area, and in fact the
construction of oriented area should pass through `ω`.)
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`: an isometric automorphism `E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E` (usual notation `J`).
This automorphism squares to -1. In a later file, rotations (`Orientation.rotation`) are defined,
in such a way that this automorphism is equal to rotation by 90 degrees.
* `Orientation.basisRightAngleRotation`: for a nonzero vector `x` in `E`, the basis `![x, J x]`
for `E`.
* `Orientation.kahler`: a complex-valued real-bilinear map `E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ`. Its real part is the
inner product and its imaginary part is `Orientation.areaForm`. For vectors `x` and `y` in `E`,
the complex number `o.kahler x y` has modulus `‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. In a later file, oriented angles
(`Orientation.oangle`) are defined, in such a way that the argument of `o.kahler x y` is the
oriented angle from `x` to `y`.
## Main results
* `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation`: the identity `J (J x) = - x`
* `Orientation.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay`: `x`, `y` are in the same ray, if
and only if `0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫` and `ω x y = 0`
* `Orientation.kahler_mul`: the identity `o.kahler x a * o.kahler a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * o.kahler x y`
* `Complex.areaForm`, `Complex.rightAngleRotation`, `Complex.kahler`: the concrete
interpretations of `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` for the oriented real inner
product space `ℂ`
* `Orientation.areaForm_map_complex`, `Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map_complex`,
`Orientation.kahler_map_complex`: given an orientation-preserving isometry from `E` to `ℂ`,
expressions for `areaForm`, `rightAngleRotation`, `kahler` as the pullback of their concrete
interpretations on `ℂ`
## Implementation notes
Notation `ω` for `Orientation.areaForm` and `J` for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation` should be
defined locally in each file which uses them, since otherwise one would need a more cumbersome
notation which mentions the orientation explicitly (something like `ω[o]`). Write
```
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
```
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
open Module
lemma FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two {K V : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Fact (finrank K V = 2)] : FiniteDimensional K V :=
.of_fact_finrank_eq_succ 1
attribute [local instance] FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [Fact (finrank ℝ E = 2)]
(o : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 2))
namespace Orientation
/-- An antisymmetric bilinear form on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 (usual
notation `ω`). When evaluated on two vectors, it gives the oriented area of the parallelogram they
span. -/
irreducible_def areaForm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := by
let z : E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
let y : E [⋀^Fin 1]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E (E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ℝ z ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap
exact y ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap (R' := ℝ) o.volumeForm
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
theorem areaForm_to_volumeForm (x y : E) : ω x y = o.volumeForm ![x, y] := by simp [areaForm]
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_apply_self (x : E) : ω x x = 0 := by
rw [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
refine o.volumeForm.map_eq_zero_of_eq ![x, x] ?_ (?_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· simp
· norm_num
theorem areaForm_swap (x y : E) : ω x y = -ω y x := by
simp only [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
convert o.volumeForm.map_swap ![y, x] (_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
· norm_num
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_neg_orientation : (-o).areaForm = -o.areaForm := by
ext x y
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
/-- Continuous linear map version of `Orientation.areaForm`, useful for calculus. -/
def areaForm' : E →L[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
(↑(LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ) ∘ₗ o.areaForm)
@[simp]
theorem areaForm'_apply (x : E) :
o.areaForm' x = LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (o.areaForm x) :=
rfl
theorem abs_areaForm_le (x y : E) : |ω x y| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.abs_volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
theorem areaForm_le (x y : E) : ω x y ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
theorem abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal {x y : E} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) : |ω x y| = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [o.areaForm_to_volumeForm, o.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal]
· simp [Fin.prod_univ_succ]
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
· simp_all
· simpa using h
· simpa [real_inner_comm] using h
· simp_all
theorem areaForm_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x y : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).areaForm x y =
o.areaForm (φ.symm x) (φ.symm y) := by
have : φ.symm ∘ ![x, y] = ![φ.symm x, φ.symm y] := by
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm, volumeForm_map, this]
/-- The area form is invariant under pullback by a positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x y : E) :
o.areaForm (φ x) (φ y) = o.areaForm x y := by
convert o.areaForm_map φ (φ x) (φ y)
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
· simp
· simp
/-- Auxiliary construction for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`, rotation by 90 degrees in an
oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. -/
irreducible_def rightAngleRotationAux₁ : E →ₗ[ℝ] E :=
let to_dual : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
(InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).toLinearEquiv ≪≫ₗ LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
↑to_dual.symm ∘ₗ ω
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left (x y : E) : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
simp only [rightAngleRotationAux₁, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv_symm,
LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv]
rw [InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply]
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right (x y : E) :
⟪x, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [real_inner_comm]
simp [o.areaForm_swap y x]
/-- Auxiliary construction for `Orientation.rightAngleRotation`, rotation by 90 degrees in an
oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. -/
def rightAngleRotationAux₂ : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
{ o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ with
norm_map' := fun x => by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (norm_nonneg (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)) with h | h
· rw [← h]
positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ h
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left]
exact o.areaForm_le x (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)
· let K : Submodule ℝ E := ℝ ∙ x
have : Nontrivial Kᗮ := by
apply nontrivial_of_finrank_pos (R := ℝ)
have : finrank ℝ K ≤ Finset.card {x} := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_singleton]
exact finrank_span_le_card ({x} : Set E)
have : Finset.card {x} = 1 := Finset.card_singleton x
have : finrank ℝ K + finrank ℝ Kᗮ = finrank ℝ E := K.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal
have : finrank ℝ E = 2 := Fact.out
omega
obtain ⟨w, hw₀⟩ : ∃ w : Kᗮ, w ≠ 0 := exists_ne 0
have hw' : ⟪x, (w : E)⟫ = 0 := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp w.2
have hw : (w : E) ≠ 0 := fun h => hw₀ (Submodule.coe_eq_zero.mp h)
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (by rwa [norm_pos_iff] : 0 < ‖(w : E)‖)
rw [← o.abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal hw']
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x w]
exact abs_real_inner_le_norm (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) w }
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ (x : E) :
o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) = -x := by
apply ext_inner_left ℝ
intro y
have : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x⟫ = ⟪y, x⟫ :=
LinearIsometry.inner_map_map o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ y x
rw [o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right, ← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left, this,
inner_neg_right]
/-- An isometric automorphism of an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 (usual notation
`J`). This automorphism squares to -1. We will define rotations in such a way that this
automorphism is equal to rotation by 90 degrees. -/
irreducible_def rightAngleRotation : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ (-o.rightAngleRotationAux₁)
(by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂]) (by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂])
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x y
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right x y
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation (x : E) : J (J x) = -x := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ x
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_symm :
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm J = LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearIsometry_injective rfl
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_self (x : E) : ⟪J x, x⟫ = 0 := by simp
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -⟪J x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap' (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = -⟪x, J y⟫ := by
simp [o.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap x y]
theorem inner_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ⟪J x, J y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map J x y
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ω (J x) y = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ω x (J y) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotation_left, o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation]
theorem areaForm_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ω (J x) (J y) = ω x y := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_rightAngleRotation :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J J = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by ext; simp
theorem rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation (x : E) :
(-o).rightAngleRotation x = -o.rightAngleRotation x := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_neg_orientation :
(-o).rightAngleRotation = o.rightAngleRotation.trans (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation
theorem rightAngleRotation_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation x =
φ (o.rightAngleRotation (φ.symm x)) := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
trans ⟪J (φ.symm x), φ.symm y⟫
· simp [o.areaForm_map]
trans ⟪φ (J (φ.symm x)), φ (φ.symm y)⟫
· rw [φ.inner_map_map]
· simp
/-- `J` commutes with any positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x : E) : φ (J x) = J (φ x) := by
convert (o.rightAngleRotation_map φ (φ x)).symm
· simp
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
theorem rightAngleRotation_map' {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation =
(φ.symm.trans o.rightAngleRotation).trans φ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_map φ
/-- `J` commutes with any positively-oriented isometric automorphism. -/
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation' (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J φ = φ.trans J :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation φ hφ
/-- For a nonzero vector `x` in an oriented two-dimensional real inner product space `E`,
`![x, J x]` forms an (orthogonal) basis for `E`. -/
def basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) : Basis (Fin 2) ℝ E :=
@basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ![x, J x]
(linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun i => by fin_cases i <;> simp [hx])
(by
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp_all))
(@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2)).symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
⇑(o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) = ![x, J x] :=
coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank _ _
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫`. (See
`Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm` for the "applied" form.) -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' (a x : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ • innerₛₗ ℝ a + ω a x • ω a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • innerₛₗ ℝ x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, mul_comm, real_inner_comm]
· simp [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, mul_comm, o.areaForm_swap a x]
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫`. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm (a x y : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' a x)
theorem inner_sq_add_areaForm_sq (a b : E) : ⟪a, b⟫ ^ 2 + ω a b ^ 2 = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ‖b‖ ^ 2 := by
simpa [sq, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq] using o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm a b b
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y`. (See
`Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub` for the "applied" form.) -/
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub' (a x : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ • ω a - ω a x • innerₛₗ ℝ a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • ω x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, mul_comm, o.areaForm_swap a x]
· simp [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, mul_comm, real_inner_comm]
/-- For vectors `a x y : E`, the identity `⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y`. -/
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub (a x y : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_areaForm_sub' a x)
theorem nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay (x y : E) :
0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫ ∧ ω x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
constructor
· let a : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 0
let b : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 1
suffices ↑0 ≤ a * ‖x‖ ^ 2 ∧ b * ‖x‖ ^ 2 = 0 → SameRay ℝ x (a • x + b • J x) by
rw [← (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).sum_repr y]
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_succ, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one', Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.sum_empty, areaForm_apply_self,
map_smul, map_add, real_inner_smul_right, inner_add_right, Matrix.cons_val_one,
Matrix.head_cons, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, zero_smul, one_smul]
exact this
rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
have hx' : 0 < ‖x‖ := by simpa using hx
have ha' : 0 ≤ a := nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left ha (by positivity)
have hb' : b = 0 := eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 hx'.ne') hb
exact (SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right x ha').add_right <| by simp [hb']
· intro h
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
simp only [inner_smul_right, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ,
areaForm_apply_self, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
positivity
/-- A complex-valued real-bilinear map on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2. Its
real part is the inner product and its imaginary part is `Orientation.areaForm`.
On `ℂ` with the standard orientation, `kahler w z = conj w * z`; see `Complex.kahler`. -/
def kahler : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ Complex.ofRealCLM ∘ₗ innerₛₗ ℝ +
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ ((LinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℂ).flip Complex.I) ∘ₗ ω
theorem kahler_apply_apply (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = ⟪x, y⟫ + ω x y • Complex.I :=
rfl
theorem kahler_swap (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = conj (o.kahler y x) := by
simp only [kahler_apply_apply]
| rw [real_inner_comm, areaForm_swap]
simp [Complex.conj_ofReal]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/TwoDim.lean | 417 | 418 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
| rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 212 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Sets invariant to a `MulAction`
In this file we define `SubMulAction R M`; a subset of a `MulAction R M` which is closed with
respect to scalar multiplication.
For most uses, typically `Submodule R M` is more powerful.
## Main definitions
* `SubMulAction.mulAction` - the `MulAction R M` transferred to the subtype.
* `SubMulAction.mulAction'` - the `MulAction S M` transferred to the subtype when
`IsScalarTower S R M`.
* `SubMulAction.isScalarTower` - the `IsScalarTower S R M` transferred to the subtype.
* `SubMulAction.inclusion` — the inclusion of a submulaction, as an equivariant map
## Tags
submodule, mul_action
-/
open Function
universe u u' u'' v
variable {S : Type u'} {T : Type u''} {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
/-- `SMulMemClass S R M` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ M` that are closed under the
scalar action of `R` on `M`.
Note that only `R` is marked as an `outParam` here, since `M` is supplied by the `SetLike`
class instead.
-/
class SMulMemClass (S : Type*) (R : outParam Type*) (M : Type*) [SMul R M] [SetLike S M] :
Prop where
/-- Multiplication by a scalar on an element of the set remains in the set. -/
smul_mem : ∀ {s : S} (r : R) {m : M}, m ∈ s → r • m ∈ s
/-- `VAddMemClass S R M` says `S` is a type of subsets `s ≤ M` that are closed under the
additive action of `R` on `M`.
Note that only `R` is marked as an `outParam` here, since `M` is supplied by the `SetLike`
class instead. -/
class VAddMemClass (S : Type*) (R : outParam Type*) (M : Type*) [VAdd R M] [SetLike S M] :
Prop where
/-- Addition by a scalar with an element of the set remains in the set. -/
vadd_mem : ∀ {s : S} (r : R) {m : M}, m ∈ s → r +ᵥ m ∈ s
attribute [to_additive] SMulMemClass
attribute [aesop safe 10 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] SMulMemClass.smul_mem VAddMemClass.vadd_mem
/-- Not registered as an instance because `R` is an `outParam` in `SMulMemClass S R M`. -/
lemma AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass {S M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubmonoidClass S M] : SMulMemClass S ℕ M where
smul_mem n _x hx := nsmul_mem hx n
/-- Not registered as an instance because `R` is an `outParam` in `SMulMemClass S R M`. -/
lemma AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass {S M : Type*} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] : SMulMemClass S ℤ M where
smul_mem n _x hx := zsmul_mem hx n
namespace SetLike
open SMulMemClass
section SMul
variable [SMul R M] [SetLike S M] [hS : SMulMemClass S R M] (s : S)
-- lower priority so other instances are found first
/-- A subset closed under the scalar action inherits that action. -/
@[to_additive "A subset closed under the additive action inherits that action."]
instance (priority := 50) smul : SMul R s :=
⟨fun r x => ⟨r • x.1, smul_mem r x.2⟩⟩
/-- This can't be an instance because Lean wouldn't know how to find `N`, but we can still use
this to manually derive `SMulMemClass` on specific types. -/
@[to_additive] theorem _root_.SMulMemClass.ofIsScalarTower (S M N α : Type*) [SetLike S α]
[SMul M N] [SMul M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N α] [SMulMemClass S N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] :
SMulMemClass S M α :=
{ smul_mem := fun m a ha => smul_one_smul N m a ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ ha }
instance instIsScalarTower [Mul M] [MulMemClass S M] [IsScalarTower R M M]
(s : S) : IsScalarTower R s s where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : M) (y : M)
instance instSMulCommClass [Mul M] [MulMemClass S M] [SMulCommClass R M M]
(s : S) : SMulCommClass R s s where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : M) (y : M)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO lower priority not actually there
-- lower priority so later simp lemmas are used first; to appease simp_nf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
protected theorem val_smul (r : R) (x : s) : (↑(r • x) : M) = r • (x : M) :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO lower priority not actually there
-- lower priority so later simp lemmas are used first; to appease simp_nf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_smul_mk (r : R) (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : r • (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) = ⟨r • x, smul_mem r hx⟩ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_def (r : R) (x : s) : r • x = ⟨r • x, smul_mem r x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_smul_mem_iff {R M S : Type*} [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] [SetLike S M]
[SMulMemClass S R M] {N : S} {x : M} : (∀ a : R, a • x ∈ N) ↔ x ∈ N :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h 1, fun h a => SMulMemClass.smul_mem a h⟩
end SMul
section OfTower
variable {N α : Type*} [SetLike S α] [SMul M N] [SMul M α] [Monoid N]
[MulAction N α] [SMulMemClass S N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] (s : S)
-- lower priority so other instances are found first
/-- A subset closed under the scalar action inherits that action. -/
@[to_additive "A subset closed under the additive action inherits that action."]
instance (priority := 50) smul' : SMul M s where
smul r x := ⟨r • x.1, smul_one_smul N r x.1 ▸ smul_mem _ x.2⟩
instance (priority := 50) : IsScalarTower M N s where
smul_assoc m n x := Subtype.ext (smul_assoc m n x.1)
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
protected theorem val_smul_of_tower (r : M) (x : s) : (↑(r • x) : α) = r • (x : α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_smul_of_tower_mk (r : M) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
r • (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) = ⟨r • x, smul_one_smul N r x ▸ smul_mem _ hx⟩ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_of_tower_def (r : M) (x : s) :
r • x = ⟨r • x, smul_one_smul N r x.1 ▸ smul_mem _ x.2⟩ :=
rfl
end OfTower
end SetLike
/-- A SubAddAction is a set which is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
structure SubAddAction (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [VAdd R M] : Type v where
/-- The underlying set of a `SubAddAction`. -/
carrier : Set M
/-- The carrier set is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
vadd_mem' : ∀ (c : R) {x : M}, x ∈ carrier → c +ᵥ x ∈ carrier
/-- A SubMulAction is a set which is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
structure SubMulAction (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [SMul R M] : Type v where
/-- The underlying set of a `SubMulAction`. -/
carrier : Set M
/-- The carrier set is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
smul_mem' : ∀ (c : R) {x : M}, x ∈ carrier → c • x ∈ carrier
namespace SubMulAction
variable [SMul R M]
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (SubMulAction R M) M :=
⟨SubMulAction.carrier, fun p q h => by cases p; cases q; congr⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : SMulMemClass (SubMulAction R M) R M where smul_mem := smul_mem' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_carrier {p : SubMulAction R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p.carrier ↔ x ∈ (p : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {p q : SubMulAction R M} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
/-- Copy of a sub_mul_action with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive "Copy of a sub_mul_action with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities."]
protected def copy (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : SubMulAction R M where
carrier := s
smul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ p.smul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : (p.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (p : SubMulAction R M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑p) : p.copy s hs = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
@[to_additive]
instance : Bot (SubMulAction R M) where
bot :=
{ carrier := ∅
smul_mem' := fun _c h => Set.not_mem_empty h }
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (SubMulAction R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
end SubMulAction
namespace SubMulAction
section SMul
variable [SMul R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
variable {r : R} {x : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_mem (r : R) (h : x ∈ p) : r • x ∈ p :=
p.smul_mem' r h
@[to_additive]
instance : SMul R p where smul c x := ⟨c • x.1, smul_mem _ c x.2⟩
variable {p} in
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem val_smul (r : R) (x : p) : (↑(r • x) : M) = r • (x : M) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needed because of defeq structure eta
/-- Embedding of a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`. -/
@[to_additive "Embedding of a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`."]
protected def subtype : p →[R] M where
toFun := Subtype.val
map_smul' := by simp [val_smul]
variable {p} in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_apply (x : p) : p.subtype x = x :=
rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective p.subtype :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_eq_val : (SubMulAction.subtype p : p → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
end SMul
namespace SMulMemClass
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] {A : Type*} [SetLike A M]
variable [hA : SMulMemClass A R M] (S' : A)
-- Prefer subclasses of `MulAction` over `SMulMemClass`.
/-- A `SubMulAction` of a `MulAction` is a `MulAction`. -/
@[to_additive "A `SubAddAction` of an `AddAction` is an `AddAction`."]
instance (priority := 75) toMulAction : MulAction R S' :=
Subtype.coe_injective.mulAction Subtype.val (SetLike.val_smul S')
/-- The natural `MulActionHom` over `R` from a `SubMulAction` of `M` to `M`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural `AddActionHom` over `R` from a `SubAddAction` of `M` to `M`."]
protected def subtype : S' →[R] M where
toFun := Subtype.val; map_smul' _ _ := rfl
variable {S'} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : S') :
SMulMemClass.subtype S' x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (SMulMemClass.subtype S') :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem coe_subtype : (SMulMemClass.subtype S' : S' → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
protected alias coeSubtype := SubMulAction.SMulMemClass.coe_subtype
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
protected alias _root_.SubAddAction.SMulMemClass.coeSubtype := SubAddAction.SMulMemClass.coe_subtype
end SMulMemClass
section MulActionMonoid
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
section
variable [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_of_tower_mem (s : S) {x : M} (h : x ∈ p) : s • x ∈ p := by
rw [← one_smul R x, ← smul_assoc]
exact p.smul_mem _ h
@[to_additive]
instance smul' : SMul S p where smul c x := ⟨c • x.1, smul_of_tower_mem _ c x.2⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower : IsScalarTower S R p where
smul_assoc s r x := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc s r (x : M)
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower' {S' : Type*} [SMul S' R] [SMul S' S] [SMul S' M] [IsScalarTower S' R M]
[IsScalarTower S' S M] : IsScalarTower S' S p where
smul_assoc s r x := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc s r (x : M)
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem val_smul_of_tower (s : S) (x : p) : ((s • x : p) : M) = s • (x : M) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_mem_iff' {G} [Group G] [SMul G R] [MulAction G M] [IsScalarTower G R M] (g : G)
{x : M} : g • x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ p :=
⟨fun h => inv_smul_smul g x ▸ p.smul_of_tower_mem g⁻¹ h, p.smul_of_tower_mem g⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isCentralScalar [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsScalarTower Sᵐᵒᵖ R M]
[IsCentralScalar S M] :
IsCentralScalar S p where
op_smul_eq_smul r x := Subtype.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul r (x : M)
end
section
variable [Monoid S] [SMul S R] [MulAction S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable (p : SubMulAction R M)
/-- If the scalar product forms a `MulAction`, then the subset inherits this action -/
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction' : MulAction S p where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul x := Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ (x : M)
mul_smul c₁ c₂ x := Subtype.ext <| mul_smul c₁ c₂ (x : M)
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction : MulAction R p :=
p.mulAction'
end
/-- Orbits in a `SubMulAction` coincide with orbits in the ambient space. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem val_image_orbit {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
Subtype.val '' MulAction.orbit R m = MulAction.orbit R (m : M) :=
(Set.range_comp _ _).symm
/- -- Previously, the relatively useless :
lemma orbit_of_sub_mul {p : SubMulAction R M} (m : p) :
| (mul_action.orbit R m : set M) = MulAction.orbit R (m : M) := rfl
-/
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/SubMulAction.lean | 370 | 373 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joachim Breitner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# The binomial distribution
This file defines the probability mass function of the binomial distribution.
## Main results
* `binomial_one_eq_bernoulli`: For `n = 1`, it is equal to `PMF.bernoulli`.
-/
namespace PMF
open ENNReal NNReal
/-- The binomial `PMF`: the probability of observing exactly `i` “heads” in a sequence of `n`
independent coin tosses, each having probability `p` of coming up “heads”. -/
def binomial (p : ℝ≥0∞) (h : p ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : PMF (Fin (n + 1)) :=
.ofFintype (fun i =>
-- Using `toNNReal` here makes this computable
↑(p.toNNReal^(i : ℕ) * (1-p.toNNReal)^((Fin.last n - i) : ℕ) * (n.choose i : ℕ))) (by
lift p to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt <| h.trans_lt one_lt_top
dsimp only
norm_cast
convert (add_pow p (1-p) n).symm
· rw [Finset.sum_fin_eq_sum_range]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
rw [dif_pos hi, Fin.last]
· rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mod_cast h), one_pow])
theorem binomial_apply (p : ℝ≥0∞) (h : p ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
binomial p h n i = p^(i : ℕ) * (1-p)^((Fin.last n - i) : ℕ) * (n.choose i : ℕ) := by
lift p to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt <| h.trans_lt one_lt_top
simp [binomial]
| @[simp]
theorem binomial_apply_zero (p : ℝ≥0∞) (h : p ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
binomial p h n 0 = (1-p)^n := by
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Binomial.lean | 45 | 47 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Derivatives of interval integrals depending on parameters
In this file we restate theorems about derivatives of integrals depending on parameters for interval
integrals. -/
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Filter Interval
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {μ : Measure ℝ} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 H] {a b ε : ℝ} {bound : ℝ → ℝ}
namespace intervalIntegral
/-- Differentiation under integral of `x ↦ ∫ t in a..b, F x t` at a given point `x₀`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is locally Lipschitz on a ball around `x₀` for ae `a`
(with a ball radius independent of `a`) with integrable Lipschitz bound, and `F x` is ae-measurable
for `x` in a possibly smaller neighborhood of `x₀`. -/
nonrec theorem hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip
{F : H → ℝ → E} {F' : ℝ → H →L[𝕜] E} {x₀ : H}
| (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(hF_int : IntervalIntegrable (F x₀) μ a b)
(hF'_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable F' (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(h_lip : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b →
LipschitzOnWith (Real.nnabs <| bound t) (fun x => F x t) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → HasFDerivAt (fun x => F x t) (F' t) x₀) :
IntervalIntegrable F' μ a b ∧
HasFDerivAt (fun x => ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) (∫ t in a..b, F' t ∂μ) x₀ := by
rw [← ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_uIoc] at h_lip h_diff
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff] at hF_int bound_integrable ⊢
simp only [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc]
have := hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas hF_int hF'_meas h_lip
bound_integrable h_diff
exact ⟨this.1, this.2.const_smul _⟩
/-- Differentiation under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀`, assuming
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ParametricIntervalIntegral.lean | 32 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
| protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 113 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# Homological complexes supported in a single degree
We define `single V j c : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c`,
which constructs complexes in `V` of shape `c`, supported in degree `j`.
In `ChainComplex.toSingle₀Equiv` we characterize chain maps to an
`ℕ`-indexed complex concentrated in degree 0; they are equivalent to
`{ f : C.X 0 ⟶ X // C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0 }`.
(This is useful translating between a projective resolution and
an augmented exact complex of projectives.)
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
universe v u
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] [HasZeroObject V]
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c` creating a chain complex supported in a single degree.
-/
noncomputable def single (j : ι) : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c where
obj A :=
{ X := fun i => if i = j then A else 0
d := fun _ _ => 0 }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) ≫ f ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) else 0 }
map_id A := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-07
the previous sensible proof `rw [if_neg h]; simp` fails with "motive not type correct".
The following is horrible. -/
convert (id_zero (C := V)).symm
all_goals simp [if_neg h]
map_comp f g := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
variable {V}
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_X_self (j : ι) (A : V) :
((single V c j).obj A).X j = A := if_pos rfl
lemma isZero_single_obj_X (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single V c j).obj A).X i) := by
dsimp [single]
rw [if_neg hi]
exact Limits.isZero_zero V
/-- The object in degree `i` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A` when `i = j`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXIsoOfEq (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i = j) :
((single V c j).obj A).X i ≅ A :=
eqToIso (by subst hi; simp [single])
/-- The object in degree `j` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXSelf (j : ι) (A : V) : ((single V c j).obj A).X j ≅ A :=
singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A j rfl
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_d (j : ι) (A : V) (k l : ι) :
((single V c j).obj A).d k l = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem single_map_f_self (j : ι) {A B : V} (f : A ⟶ B) :
((single V c j).map f).f j = (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom ≫
f ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv := by
dsimp [single]
rw [dif_pos rfl]
rfl
variable (V)
/-- The natural isomorphism `single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def singleCompEvalIsoSelf (j : ι) : single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V :=
NatIso.ofComponents (singleObjXSelf c j) (fun {A B} f => by simp [single_map_f_self])
lemma isZero_single_comp_eval (j i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) : IsZero (single V c j ⋙ eval V c i) :=
Functor.isZero _ (fun _ ↦ isZero_single_obj_X c _ _ _ hi)
variable {V c}
@[ext]
lemma from_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : (single V c j).obj A ⟶ K} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_src
@[ext]
lemma to_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : K ⟶ (single V c j).obj A} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_tgt
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).Faithful where
map_injective {A B f g} w := by
rw [← cancel_mono (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv,
← cancel_epi (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom, ← single_map_f_self,
← single_map_f_self, w]
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).Full where
map_surjective {A B} f :=
⟨(singleObjXSelf c j A).inv ≫ f.f j ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).hom, by
ext
simp [single_map_f_self]⟩
/-- Constructor for morphisms to a single homological complex. -/
noncomputable def mkHomToSingle {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : K.X j ⟶ A)
(hφ : ∀ (i : ι), c.Rel i j → K.d i j ≫ φ = 0) :
K ⟶ (single V c j).obj A where
f i :=
if hi : i = j
then (K.XIsoOfEq hi).hom ≫ φ ≫ (singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A i hi).inv
else 0
comm' i k hik := by
dsimp
rw [comp_zero]
split_ifs with hk
· subst hk
simp only [XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, id_comp, reassoc_of% hφ i hik, zero_comp]
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A k hk).eq_of_tgt
@[simp]
lemma mkHomToSingle_f {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : K.X j ⟶ A)
(hφ : ∀ (i : ι), c.Rel i j → K.d i j ≫ φ = 0) :
(mkHomToSingle φ hφ).f j = φ ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j A).inv := by
dsimp [mkHomToSingle]
rw [dif_pos rfl, id_comp]
| rfl
/-- Constructor for morphisms from a single homological complex. -/
noncomputable def mkHomFromSingle {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : A ⟶ K.X j)
(hφ : ∀ (k : ι), c.Rel j k → φ ≫ K.d j k = 0) :
(single V c j).obj A ⟶ K where
f i :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Single.lean | 157 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
· exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
· simp only [← ih]
| exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
end LieModule
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 121 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Basic facts about biproducts in preadditive categories.
In (or between) preadditive categories,
* Any biproduct satisfies the equality
`total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`,
or, in the binary case, `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`.
* Any (binary) `product` or (binary) `coproduct` is a (binary) `biproduct`.
* In any category (with zero morphisms), if `biprod.map f g` is an isomorphism,
then both `f` and `g` are isomorphisms.
* If `f` is a morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
then we can construct isomorphisms `L : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂` and `R : Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂`
so that `L.hom ≫ g ≫ R.hom` is diagonal (with `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` component still `f`),
via Gaussian elimination.
* As a corollary of the previous two facts,
if we have an isomorphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
we can construct an isomorphism `X₂ ≅ Y₂`.
* If `f : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z` is an isomorphism, either `𝟙 W = 0`,
or at least one of the component maps `W ⟶ Y` and `W ⟶ Z` is nonzero.
* If `f : ⨁ S ⟶ ⨁ T` is an isomorphism,
then every column (corresponding to a nonzero summand in the domain)
has some nonzero matrix entry.
* A functor preserves a biproduct if and only if it preserves
the corresponding product if and only if it preserves the corresponding coproduct.
There are connections between this material and the special case of the category whose morphisms are
matrices over a ring, in particular the Schur complement (see
`Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SchurComplement`). In particular, the declarations
`CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`, `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian`
and `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` are all closely related.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
namespace Limits
section Fintype
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBilimitOfTotal {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) :
b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => ∑ j : J, s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ b.ι j
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
have reassoced : m ≫ Bicone.π b j ≫ Bicone.ι b j = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ Bicone.ι b j := by
erw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
rw [reassoced]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [sum_comp, Category.assoc, Bicone.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp
simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app ⟨j⟩
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, sum_comp]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
erw [Category.assoc, h ⟨j⟩]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp]
dsimp; simp }
theorem IsBilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : Bicone f} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBiproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f)
(total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBiproduct f :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsLimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsLimit t) : (Bicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsLimit _ <| IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ht <| Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsColimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp_rw [Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp]
simp
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (Bicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsColimit _ <| IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro ⟨j⟩; simp
end Fintype
section Finite
variable {J : Type} [Finite J]
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
end Finite
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct _ }⟩
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts [HasFiniteCoproducts C] :
HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct _ }⟩
section HasBiproduct
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f]
/-- In any preadditive category, any biproduct satisfies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
IsBilimit.total (biproduct.isBilimit _)
theorem biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j := by
classical
ext j
simp only [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, if_true]
theorem biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j := by
classical
ext j
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j := by
classical
simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite,
dite_comp]
theorem biproduct.map_eq [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_matrix {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
{P} (x : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.lift_desc]
end HasBiproduct
section HasFiniteBiproducts
variable {J K : Type} [Finite J] {f : J → C} [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_desc [Fintype K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
(m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : ∀ k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc fun j => ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k := by
ext
simp [lift_desc]
variable [Finite K]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_map {f : J → C} {g : K → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ k, g k ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.map n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j k ≫ n k := by
ext
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.map_matrix {f : J → C} {g : J → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ k, f k ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ j k, g j ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.map m ≫ biproduct.matrix n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j ≫ n j k := by
ext
simp
end HasFiniteBiproducts
/-- Reindex a categorical biproduct via an equivalence of the index types. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.reindex {β γ : Type} [Finite β] (ε : β ≃ γ)
(f : γ → C) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (f ∘ ε)] : ⨁ f ∘ ε ≅ ⨁ f where
hom := biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.ι f (ε b)
inv := biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.π f (ε b)
hom_inv_id := by
ext b b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· subst h; simp
· have : ε b' ≠ ε b := by simp [h]
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h, biproduct.ι_π_ne _ this]
inv_hom_id := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
ext g g'
by_cases h : g' = g <;>
simp [Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.lift_desc,
biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply,
Finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.univ (ε.symm g') _, h]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBinaryBilimitOfTotal {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s =>
(BinaryFan.fst s ≫ b.inl : s.pt ⟶ b.pt) + (BinaryFan.snd s ≫ b.inr : s.pt ⟶ b.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
have reassoced (j : WalkingPair) {W : C} (h' : _ ⟶ W) :
m ≫ b.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_add, reassoced WalkingPair.left,
reassoced WalkingPair.right]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s =>
(b.fst ≫ BinaryCofan.inl s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt) + (b.snd ≫ BinaryCofan.inr s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, add_comp, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩, h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
theorem IsBilimit.binary_total {X Y : C} {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBinaryBiproduct_of_total {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBinaryBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
snd := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
inl := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
inr := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
theorem inl_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inl = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
theorem inr_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inr = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ (by refine BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp)
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
(BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (by simp) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary products exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryProducts [HasBinaryProducts C] : HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct X Y }
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone {X Y : C} {t : Cocone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
snd := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
inl := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
inr := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
theorem fst_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.fst = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
theorem snd_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.snd = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a
bilimit bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| by
refine BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {X Y : C} {t : Cocone (pair X Y)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit (BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone ht) <|
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <|
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary coproducts exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryCoproducts [HasBinaryCoproducts C] :
HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryCoproduct X Y }
section
variable {X Y : C} [HasBinaryBiproduct X Y]
/-- In any preadditive category, any binary biproduct satisfies
`biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem biprod.total : biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y) := by
ext <;> simp [add_comp]
theorem biprod.lift_eq {T : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} :
biprod.lift f g = f ≫ biprod.inl + g ≫ biprod.inr := by ext <;> simp [add_comp]
theorem biprod.desc_eq {T : C} {f : X ⟶ T} {g : Y ⟶ T} :
biprod.desc f g = biprod.fst ≫ f + biprod.snd ≫ g := by ext <;> simp [add_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprod.lift_desc {T U : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} {h : X ⟶ U} {i : Y ⟶ U} :
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc h i = f ≫ h + g ≫ i := by simp [biprod.lift_eq, biprod.desc_eq]
theorem biprod.map_eq [HasBinaryBiproducts C] {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} :
biprod.map f g = biprod.fst ≫ f ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ g ≫ biprod.inr := by
ext <;> simp
section
variable {Z : C}
lemma biprod.decomp_hom_to (f : Z ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :
∃ f₁ f₂, f = f₁ ≫ biprod.inl + f₂ ≫ biprod.inr :=
⟨f ≫ biprod.fst, f ≫ biprod.snd, by aesop⟩
lemma biprod.ext_to_iff {f g : Z ⟶ X ⊞ Y} :
f = g ↔ f ≫ biprod.fst = g ≫ biprod.fst ∧ f ≫ biprod.snd = g ≫ biprod.snd := by
aesop
lemma biprod.decomp_hom_from (f : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Z) :
∃ f₁ f₂, f = biprod.fst ≫ f₁ + biprod.snd ≫ f₂ :=
⟨biprod.inl ≫ f, biprod.inr ≫ f, by aesop⟩
lemma biprod.ext_from_iff {f g : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Z} :
f = g ↔ biprod.inl ≫ f = biprod.inl ≫ g ∧ biprod.inr ≫ f = biprod.inr ≫ g := by
aesop
end
/-- Every split mono `f` with a cokernel induces a binary bicone with `f` as its `inl` and
the cokernel map as its `snd`.
| We will show in `is_bilimit_binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel` that this binary bicone is in
fact already a biproduct. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Biproducts.lean | 471 | 472 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
| rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 564 | 565 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_eq_left]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_neg_cancel, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
zsmul_left_inj hp]
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, zsmul_left_inj hp]
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_left_mono hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_left_strictMono hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
end
/-!
### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
section Circular
open AddCommGroup
private theorem toIxxMod_iff (x₁ x₂ x₃ : α) : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp 0 (x₂ - x₁) + toIcoMod hp 0 (x₁ - x₃) ≤ p := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_sub, toIocMod_eq_sub _ x₁, add_le_add_iff_right, ← neg_sub x₁ x₃, toIocMod_neg,
neg_zero, le_sub_iff_add_le]
private theorem toIxxMod_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} (h : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃) :
toIcoMod hp x₂ x₃ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₁ := by
let x₂' := toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂
let x₃' := toIcoMod hp x₂' x₃
have h : x₂' ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' := by simpa [x₃']
have h₂₁ : x₂' < x₁ + p := toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _
have h₃₂ : x₃' - p < x₂' := sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _)
suffices hequiv : x₃' ≤ toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ by
obtain ⟨z, hd⟩ : ∃ z : ℤ, x₂ = x₂' + z • p := ((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).1 rfl).2
simpa [hd, toIocMod_add_zsmul', toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_le_add_iff_right]
rcases le_or_lt x₃' (x₁ + p) with h₃₁ | h₁₃
· suffices hIoc₂₁ : toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ = x₁ + p from hIoc₂₁.symm.trans_ge h₃₁
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨h₂₁, by simp [x₂', left_le_toIcoMod]⟩, -1, by simp⟩
have hIoc₁₃ : toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' = x₃' - p := by
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 h₁₃, le_of_lt (h₃₂.trans h₂₁)⟩, 1, by simp⟩
have not_h₃₂ := (h.trans hIoc₁₃.le).not_lt
contradiction
private theorem toIxxMod_antisymm (h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c)
(h₁₃₂ : toIcoMod hp a c ≤ toIocMod hp a b) :
b ≡ a [PMOD p] ∨ c ≡ b [PMOD p] ∨ a ≡ c [PMOD p] := by
by_contra! h
rw [modEq_comm] at h
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.2.2] at h₁₂₃
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.1] at h₁₃₂
exact h.2.1 ((toIcoMod_inj _).1 <| h₁₃₂.antisymm h₁₂₃)
private theorem toIxxMod_total' (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp b a ≤ toIocMod hp b c ∨ toIcoMod hp b c ≤ toIocMod hp b a := by
/- an essential ingredient is the lemma saying {a-b} + {b-a} = period if a ≠ b (and = 0 if a = b).
Thus if a ≠ b and b ≠ c then ({a-b} + {b-c}) + ({c-b} + {b-a}) = 2 * period, so one of
`{a-b} + {b-c}` and `{c-b} + {b-a}` must be `≤ period` -/
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp a b) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp c b)
simp only [add_add_add_comm] at this
rw [_root_.add_comm (toIocMod _ _ _), add_add_add_comm, ← two_nsmul] at this
replace := min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul this.le
rw [min_le_iff] at this
rw [toIxxMod_iff, toIxxMod_iff]
refine this.imp (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _) (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _)
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
private theorem toIxxMod_total (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c ∨ toIcoMod hp c b ≤ toIocMod hp c a :=
(toIxxMod_total' _ _ _ _).imp_right <| toIxxMod_cyclic_left _
private theorem toIxxMod_trans {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : α}
(h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁)
(h₂₃₄ : toIcoMod hp x₂ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₂) :
toIcoMod hp x₁ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁ := by
constructor
· suffices h : ¬x₃ ≡ x₂ [PMOD p] by
have h₁₂₃' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₁₂₃.1)
have h₂₃₄' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₂₃₄.1)
rw [(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 h] at h₂₃₄'
exact toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (h₁₂₃'.trans h₂₃₄')
| by_contra h
rw [(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp).1 h] at h₁₂₃
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 784 | 785 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Extension
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Defs
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integral
/-!
# Algebraically Closed Field
In this file we define the typeclass for algebraically closed fields and algebraic closures,
and prove some of their properties.
## Main Definitions
- `IsAlgClosed k` is the typeclass saying `k` is an algebraically closed field, i.e. every
polynomial in `k` splits.
- `IsAlgClosure R K` is the typeclass saying `K` is an algebraic closure of `R`, where `R` is a
commutative ring. This means that the map from `R` to `K` is injective, and `K` is
algebraically closed and algebraic over `R`
- `IsAlgClosed.lift` is a map from an algebraic extension `L` of `R`, into any algebraically
closed extension of `R`.
- `IsAlgClosure.equiv` is a proof that any two algebraic closures of the
same field are isomorphic.
## Tags
algebraic closure, algebraically closed
## Main results
- `IsAlgClosure.of_splits`: if `K / k` is algebraic, and every monic irreducible polynomial over
`k` splits in `K`, then `K` is algebraically closed (in fact an algebraic closure of `k`).
For the stronger fact that only requires every such polynomial has a root in `K`,
see `IsAlgClosure.of_exist_roots`.
Reference: <https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/galoistheory/algclosure.pdf>, Theorem 2
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
variable (k : Type u) [Field k]
/-- Typeclass for algebraically closed fields.
To show `Polynomial.Splits p f` for an arbitrary ring homomorphism `f`,
see `IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain` and `IsAlgClosed.splits_domain`.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "The definition of `IsAlgClosed` in mathlib is 09GR (4)"]
class IsAlgClosed : Prop where
splits : ∀ p : k[X], p.Splits <| RingHom.id k
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `k` is algebraically closed.
See also `IsAlgClosed.splits_domain` for the case where `K` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain {k K : Type*} [Field k] [IsAlgClosed k] [CommRing K]
{f : K →+* k} (p : K[X]) : p.Splits f := by
convert IsAlgClosed.splits (p.map f); simp [splits_map_iff]
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `K` is algebraically closed.
See also `IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain` for the case where `k` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem IsAlgClosed.splits_domain {k K : Type*} [Field k] [IsAlgClosed k] [Field K] {f : k →+* K}
(p : k[X]) : p.Splits f :=
Polynomial.splits_of_splits_id _ <| IsAlgClosed.splits _
namespace IsAlgClosed
variable {k}
/--
If `k` is algebraically closed, then every nonconstant polynomial has a root.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "(4) ⟹ (3)"]
theorem exists_root [IsAlgClosed k] (p : k[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
exists_root_of_splits _ (IsAlgClosed.splits p) hp
theorem exists_pow_nat_eq [IsAlgClosed k] (x : k) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : ∃ z, z ^ n = x := by
have : degree (X ^ n - C x) ≠ 0 := by
rw [degree_X_pow_sub_C hn x]
exact ne_of_gt (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 hn)
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := exists_root (X ^ n - C x) this
use z
simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_pow, eval_sub, IsRoot.def] at hz
exact sub_eq_zero.1 hz
theorem exists_eq_mul_self [IsAlgClosed k] (x : k) : ∃ z, x = z * z := by
rcases exists_pow_nat_eq x zero_lt_two with ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact ⟨z, sq z⟩
theorem roots_eq_zero_iff [IsAlgClosed k] {p : k[X]} :
p.roots = 0 ↔ p = Polynomial.C (p.coeff 0) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hp => by rw [hp, roots_C]⟩
rcases le_or_lt (degree p) 0 with hd | hd
· exact eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hd
· obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_root p hd.ne'
rw [← mem_roots (ne_zero_of_degree_gt hd), h] at hz
simp at hz
theorem exists_eval₂_eq_zero_of_injective {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [IsAlgClosed k] (f : R →+* k)
(hf : Function.Injective f) (p : R[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, p.eval₂ f x = 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root (p.map f) (by rwa [degree_map_eq_of_injective hf])
⟨x, by rwa [eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← IsRoot]⟩
theorem exists_eval₂_eq_zero {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [IsAlgClosed k] (f : R →+* k) (p : R[X])
(hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, p.eval₂ f x = 0 :=
exists_eval₂_eq_zero_of_injective f f.injective p hp
variable (k)
theorem exists_aeval_eq_zero_of_injective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsAlgClosed k] [Algebra R k]
(hinj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R k)) (p : R[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) :
∃ x : k, aeval x p = 0 :=
exists_eval₂_eq_zero_of_injective (algebraMap R k) hinj p hp
theorem exists_aeval_eq_zero {R : Type*} [Field R] [IsAlgClosed k] [Algebra R k] (p : R[X])
(hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x : k, aeval x p = 0 :=
exists_eval₂_eq_zero (algebraMap R k) p hp
/--
If every nonconstant polynomial over `k` has a root, then `k` is algebraically closed.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "(3) ⟹ (4)"]
theorem of_exists_root (H : ∀ p : k[X], p.Monic → Irreducible p → ∃ x, p.eval x = 0) :
IsAlgClosed k := by
refine ⟨fun p ↦ Or.inr ?_⟩
intro q hq _
have : Irreducible (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := by
classical
rw [← coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero hq.ne_zero]
exact (associated_normalize _).irreducible hq
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := H (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq.ne_zero) this
exact degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq.ne_zero ▸ degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_root this hx
theorem of_ringEquiv (k' : Type u) [Field k'] (e : k ≃+* k')
[IsAlgClosed k] : IsAlgClosed k' := by
apply IsAlgClosed.of_exists_root
intro p hmp hp
have hpe : degree (p.map e.symm.toRingHom) ≠ 0 := by
rw [degree_map]
exact ne_of_gt (degree_pos_of_irreducible hp)
rcases IsAlgClosed.exists_root (k := k) (p.map e.symm.toRingHom) hpe with ⟨x, hx⟩
use e x
rw [IsRoot] at hx
apply e.symm.injective
rw [map_zero, ← hx]
clear hx hpe hp hmp
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on <;> simp_all
/--
If `k` is algebraically closed, then every irreducible polynomial over `k` is linear.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "(4) ⟹ (2)"]
theorem degree_eq_one_of_irreducible [IsAlgClosed k] {p : k[X]} (hp : Irreducible p) :
p.degree = 1 :=
degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_splits hp (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _)
|
theorem algebraMap_bijective_of_isIntegral {k K : Type*} [Field k] [Ring K] [IsDomain K]
[hk : IsAlgClosed k] [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsIntegral k K] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap k K) := by
refine ⟨RingHom.injective _, fun x ↦ ⟨-(minpoly k x).coeff 0, ?_⟩⟩
have hq : (minpoly k x).leadingCoeff = 1 := minpoly.monic (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x)
have h : (minpoly k x).degree = 1 := degree_eq_one_of_irreducible k (minpoly.irreducible
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x))
have : aeval x (minpoly k x) = 0 := minpoly.aeval k x
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one h, hq, C_1, one_mul, aeval_add, aeval_X, aeval_C,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at this
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsAlgClosed/Basic.lean | 169 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly
equicontinuous on `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous at `x₀` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is very useful for
developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous on `S` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is
uniformly continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*.
This is very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly
for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is uniformly continuous on `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*. This is very useful
for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := t k) F S x₀) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold ContinuousWithinAt nhdsWithin at hk ⊢
rw [nhds_iInf]
exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousAt (tX := t k) F x₀) :
EquicontinuousAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F x₀ := by
rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
exact equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom hk
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : Equicontinuous (tX := t k) F) :
Equicontinuous (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F :=
fun x ↦ equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom (hk x)
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousOn (tX := t k) F S) :
EquicontinuousOn (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S :=
fun x hx ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom (hk x hx)
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_dom {u : κ → UniformSpace β'} {F : ι → β' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := u k) F) :
UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := ⨅ k, u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uβ := _)] at hk ⊢
exact uniformContinuous_iInf_dom hk
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_dom {u : κ → UniformSpace β'} {F : ι → β' → α}
{S : Set β'} {k : κ} (hk : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uβ := u k) F S) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn (uβ := ⨅ k, u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uβ := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_left {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set X}
{F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝 x₀).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x ∈ s k, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _)]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_left {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set X}
{F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝[S] x₀).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x ∈ s k, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U := by
rw [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _)]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_right {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set (α × α)}
{F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, p k → ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s k := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_right {p : κ → Prop}
{s : κ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ k, p k → ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s k := by
rw [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
| theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff {κ₁ κ₂ : Type*} {p₁ : κ₁ → Prop} {s₁ : κ₁ → Set X}
{p₂ : κ₂ → Prop} {s₂ : κ₂ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝 x₀).HasBasis p₁ s₁)
(hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p₂ s₂) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ k₂, p₂ k₂ → ∃ k₁, p₁ k₁ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁ k₁, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s₂ k₂ := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 633 | 638 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
/-!
# Order topology on a densely ordered set
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
section DenselyOrdered
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
{s : Set α}
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`, unless `a` is a top
element. -/
theorem closure_Ioi' {a : α} (h : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self isClosed_Ici
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Ici_diff_Ioi_same, singleton_subset_iff]
exact isGLB_Ioi.mem_closure h
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioi (a : α) [NoMaxOrder α] : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
closure_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the closed interval `(-∞, a]`, unless `a` is a bottom
element. -/
theorem closure_Iio' (h : (Iio a).Nonempty) : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Ioi' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the interval `(-∞, a]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iio (a : α) [NoMinOrder α] : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Iio' nonempty_Iio
/-- The closure of the open interval `(a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· rcases hab.lt_or_lt with hab | hab
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Icc_diff_Ioo_same hab.le]
have hab' : (Ioo a b).Nonempty := nonempty_Ioo.2 hab
simp only [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨(isGLB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab', (isLUB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab'⟩
· rw [Icc_eq_empty_of_lt hab]
exact empty_subset _
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, b]` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
/-- The closure of the interval `[a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a := by
rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio' ha, compl_Iic]
theorem interior_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
interior_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem interior_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Ici' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem interior_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem interior_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} :
Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Icc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ico, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ioc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
theorem closure_interior_Icc {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : closure (interior (Icc a b)) = Icc a b :=
(closure_minimal interior_subset isClosed_Icc).antisymm <|
calc
Icc a b = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Icc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ioc_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | h)
· simp
· calc
Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := Ioc_subset_Icc_self
_ = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Ioc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ico_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ico a b)) := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using
Ioc_subset_closure_interior (OrderDual.toDual b) (OrderDual.toDual a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ici a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ici a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iic a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iic a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioi' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Ioi' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iio' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iio a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Iio' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Iio [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iio a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iio' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
frontier (Icc a b) = {a, b} := by simp [frontier, h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioo {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioo a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioo h.ne, interior_Ioo, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ico a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ico h.ne, interior_Ico, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioc a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioc h.ne, interior_Ioc, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' {a b : α} (H₁ : (Ioi a).Nonempty) (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Ioi' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' nonempty_Ioi H
theorem nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt {a : α} (H : ∃ b, a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' H (le_refl a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' := nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt
instance nhdsGT_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot le_rfl
@[deprecated nhdsGT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsGT_neBot a
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' {b c : α} (H₁ : (Iio c).Nonempty) (H₂ : b ≤ c) :
NeBot (𝓝[Iio c] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Iio' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Iio b] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' nonempty_Iio H
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' {b : α} (H : (Iio b).Nonempty) : NeBot (𝓝[<] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' H (le_refl b)
instance nhdsLT_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot (le_refl a)
@[deprecated nhdsLT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsLT_neBot a
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ico a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ico H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ico.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioc a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioc H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioc.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop := by
nontriviality
haveI : Nonempty s := nontrivial_iff_nonempty.1 ‹_›
rcases hs (nonempty_subtype.1 ‹_›) with ⟨a, h, hs⟩
ext u; constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxa : a ≤ x, hxb : x < b⟩, hxt : Ioo x b ⊆ t⟩ :=
(mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset h).mp ht
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyb⟩ := exists_between hxb
refine mem_of_superset (mem_atTop ⟨y, hs ⟨hxa.trans_lt hxy, hyb⟩⟩) ?_
rintro ⟨z, hzs⟩ (hyz : y ≤ z)
exact hts (hxt ⟨hxy.trans_le hyz, hb hzs⟩)
· intro hu
obtain ⟨x : s, hx : ∀ z, x ≤ z → z ∈ u⟩ := mem_atTop_sets.1 hu
exact ⟨Ioo x b, Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (hb x.2), fun z hz => hx _ hz.1.le⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Iio_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot := by
apply comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
simp only [OrderDual.exists, Ioo_toDual]
exact hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Ioi_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : ∀ a' < b, ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] b := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (Iio b) with (hb' | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· have : IsEmpty s := ⟨fun x => hb'.subset (hb x.2)⟩
rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty atTop, Filter.map_bot, hb', nhdsWithin_empty]
· rw [← comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset hb fun _ => hs a ha, map_comap_of_mem]
rw [Subtype.range_val]
exact (mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' ha).2 (hs a ha)
theorem map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : ∀ b' > a, ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a := by
-- the elaborator gets stuck without `(... :)`
refine (map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
fun b' hb' => ?_ :)
simpa using hs b' hb'
/-- The `atTop` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the left-neighbourhoods filter at
the right endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop :=
comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self fun h => ⟨a, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the right-neighbourhoods filter at
the left endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Ioi_self fun h => ⟨b, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioi a → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (Subset.refl _) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x, hx, Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Iio a → α) (𝓝[<] a) = atTop :=
comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (α := αᵒᵈ) a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Iio_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioo_atTop {a b : α} (h : a < b) : map ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] b :=
map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self fun _ _ => ⟨_, h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioo_atBot {a b : α} (h : a < b) : map ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a :=
map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Ioi_self fun _ _ => ⟨_, h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioi_atBot (a : α) : map ((↑) : Ioi a → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a :=
map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset (Subset.refl _) fun b hb => ⟨b, hb, Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Iio_atTop (a : α) : map ((↑) : Iio a → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] a :=
map_coe_Ioi_atBot (α := αᵒᵈ) _
variable {l : Filter β} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop (h : a < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioo a b => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioo_atTop h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot (h : a < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioo a b => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioo_atBot h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioi_atBot :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioi a => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Iio_atTop :
Tendsto (fun x : Iio a => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Iio_atTop, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioo_atTop {f : β → Ioo a b} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[<] b) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioo_atBot {f : β → Ioo a b} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[>] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioi_atBot {f : β → Ioi a} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[>] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
| theorem tendsto_Iio_atTop {f : β → Iio a} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[<] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/DenselyOrdered.lean | 350 | 352 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open Module
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = Real.arctan r := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | rfl | hr)
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = -(π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_neg _ _ hr, o.oangle_neg_right h, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h, ←
sub_eq_zero, add_comm, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
add_assoc, add_halves, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi]
simpa using h
-- Porting note: if the type is not given in `neg_neg` then Lean "forgets" about the instance
-- `Neg (Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))`
rw [← neg_inj, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, @neg_neg Real.Angle] at ha
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, oangle_rev,
(-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hr, Real.arctan_neg, Real.Angle.coe_neg, neg_neg]
· rw [zero_smul, add_zero, oangle_self, Real.arctan_zero, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hr, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h]
rw [o.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hr]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, ←
neg_neg ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Real.Angle), ← rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg, add_comm]
have hx : x = r⁻¹ • (-o).rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • (-o).rotation (-(π / 2 : ℝ)) x) := by simp [hr]
nth_rw 3 [hx]
refine (-o).oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two ?_ _
simp [hr, h]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle, where one side is a multiple of a
rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) = r := by
rw [o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle, where one side is a multiple of a
rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) =
r⁻¹ := by
rw [o.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x - x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
have hx : -x = r⁻¹ • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) := by
simp [hr, ← Real.Angle.coe_add]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, hx, o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two]
simpa [hr] using h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (x - r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) x = Real.arctan r := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
have hx : x = r⁻¹ • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (-(r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) := by
simp [hr, ← Real.Angle.coe_add]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
nth_rw 3 [hx]
nth_rw 2 [hx]
rw [o.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two, inv_inv]
simpa [hr] using h
end Orientation
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arccos (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arccos (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arcsin (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arcsin (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arctan (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arctan (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe, dist_comm p₁ p₃,
cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
| opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 638 | 642 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[f i] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min_const hτ]; apply MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_inf
theorem measurableSet_inter_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π)
(s : Set Ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet] at hs ⊢
intro i
have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} =
s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} ∩
{ω | min (τ ω) i ≤ min (min (τ ω) (π ω)) i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [min_le_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff, le_refl, true_and,
true_or]
by_cases hτi : τ ω ≤ i
· simp only [hτi, true_or, and_true, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor <;> intro h
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases h with h | h
· exact h
· exact hτi.trans h
simp only [hτi, false_or, and_false, false_and, iff_false, not_and, not_le, and_imp]
refine fun _ hτ_le_π => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hτ_le_π
rw [← not_le]
exact hτi
rw [this]
refine ((hs i).inter ((hτ.min hπ) i)).inter ?_
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f i) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact ((hτ.min hπ).min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_iff [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self]
rw [this]
exact measurableSet_inter_le _ hπ _ h
· rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at h
exact h.1
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_min_iff hτ (isStoppingTime_const _ i),
IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_const, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩, fun h j => h.1 j⟩
specialize h i
rwa [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self] at h
theorem measurableSet_le_stopping_time [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω | min (τ ω) j ≤ min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, min_le_iff, le_min_iff, le_refl,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
simp only [h, or_self_iff, and_true]
rw [Iff.comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact h.trans
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f j) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_stopping_time_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
suffices MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} by
rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at this; exact this.2
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}, ← hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_iff hπ, Set.univ_inter]
exact measurableSet_le_stopping_time hτ hπ
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time [AddGroup ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[MeasurableSub₂ ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hσ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hσ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time_of_countable [Countable ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hπ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hπ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end IsStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
/-! ## Stopped value and stopped process -/
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, its stopped value with respect to the stopping
time `τ` is the map `x ↦ u (τ ω) ω`. -/
def stoppedValue (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : Ω → β := fun ω => u (τ ω) ω
theorem stoppedValue_const (u : ι → Ω → β) (i : ι) : (stoppedValue u fun _ => i) = u i :=
rfl
variable [LinearOrder ι]
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, the stopped process with respect to `τ` is `u i ω` if
`i ≤ τ ω`, and `u (τ ω) ω` otherwise.
Intuitively, the stopped process stops evolving once the stopping time has occurred. -/
def stoppedProcess (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : ι → Ω → β := fun i ω => u (min i (τ ω)) ω
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_stoppedValue {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedProcess u τ = fun i => stoppedValue u fun ω => min i (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedProcess {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ σ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess u τ) σ = stoppedValue u fun ω => min (σ ω) (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_le {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : i ≤ τ ω) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u i ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_left h]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : τ ω ≤ i) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u (τ ω) ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_right h]
section ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
theorem progMeasurable_min_stopping_time [MetrizableSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => min i (τ ω) := by
intro i
let m_prod : MeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)
let m_set : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω), MeasurableSpace t := fun _ =>
@Subtype.instMeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) _ m_prod
let s := {p : Set.Iic i × Ω | τ p.2 ≤ i}
have hs : MeasurableSet[m_prod] s := @measurable_snd (Set.Iic i) Ω _ (f i) _ (hτ i)
have h_meas_fst : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω),
Measurable[m_set t] fun x : t => ((x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst : ι) :=
fun t => (@measurable_subtype_coe (Set.Iic i × Ω) m_prod _).fst.subtype_val
apply Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs ?_ ?_
· refine @Measurable.min _ _ _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ _ (h_meas_fst s) ?_
refine @measurable_of_Iic ι s _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ fun j => ?_
have h_set_eq : (fun x : s => τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' Set.Iic j =
(fun x : s => (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' {ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iic, iff_and_self, le_min_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun _ => ω.prop
rw [h_set_eq]
suffices h_meas : @Measurable _ _ (m_set s) (f i) fun x : s ↦ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd from
h_meas (f.mono (min_le_left _ _) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (min i j)))
exact measurable_snd.comp (@measurable_subtype_coe _ m_prod _)
· letI sc := sᶜ
suffices h_min_eq_left :
(fun x : sc => min (↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst) (τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd)) = fun x : sc =>
↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [sc, Set.restrict, h_min_eq_left]
exact h_meas_fst _
ext1 ω
rw [min_eq_left]
have hx_fst_le : ↑(ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst ≤ i := (ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst.prop
refine hx_fst_le.trans (le_of_lt ?_)
convert ω.prop
simp only [sc, s, not_le, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : ProgMeasurable f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
h.comp (progMeasurable_min_stopping_time hτ) fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _
theorem ProgMeasurable.adapted_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(h.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem ProgMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι]
(hu : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ i) :=
(hu.adapted_stoppedProcess hτ i).mono (f.le _)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le (h : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : StronglyMeasurable[f n] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have : stoppedValue u τ =
(fun p : Set.Iic n × Ω => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) ∘ fun ω => (⟨τ ω, hτ_le ω⟩, ω) := by
ext1 ω; simp only [stoppedValue, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [this]
refine StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable (h n) ?_
exact (hτ.measurable_of_le hτ_le).subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_id
theorem measurable_stoppedValue [MetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(hf_prog : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have h_str_meas : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf_prog (hτ.min_const i) fun _ => min_le_right _ _
intro t ht i
suffices stoppedValue u τ ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} =
(stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} by
rw [this]; exact ((h_str_meas i).measurable ht).inter (hτ.measurableSet_le i)
ext1 ω
simp only [stoppedValue, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [min_eq_left h]
end ProgMeasurable
end LinearOrder
section StoppedValueOfMemFinset
variable {μ : Measure Ω} {τ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {u : ι → Ω → E}
theorem stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ s, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext y
classical
rw [stoppedValue, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
suffices {i ∈ s | y ∈ {ω : Ω | τ ω = i}} = ({τ y} : Finset ι) by
rw [this, Finset.sum_singleton]
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_singleton]
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.2.symm
· refine ⟨?_, h.symm⟩; rw [h]; exact hbdd y
theorem stoppedValue_eq' [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {N : ι}
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Iic N, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset [LinearOrder ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (n : ι)
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ s with i < n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_apply]
rcases le_or_lt n (τ ω) with h | h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_le h, Set.indicator_of_mem, Finset.sum_eq_zero, add_zero]
· intro m hm
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hm
exact (hm.2.trans_le h).ne'
· exact h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge (le_of_lt h), Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (τ ω)]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, zero_add, Set.indicator_of_mem] <;> rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact not_le.2 h
· rw [Finset.mem_filter]
exact ⟨hbdd ω h, h⟩
· intro b _ hneq
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact hneq.symm
theorem stoppedProcess_eq'' [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] (n : ι) :
stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.Iio n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
have h_mem : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ Finset.Iio n := fun ω h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset n h_mem]
congr with i
simp
section StoppedValue
variable [PartialOrder ι] {ℱ : Filtration ι m} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ)
{s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) : MemLp (stoppedValue u τ) p μ := by
rw [stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset hbdd]
refine memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => MemLp.indicator ?_ (hu i)
refine ℱ.le i {a : Ω | τ a = i} (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range ?_ i)
refine ((Finset.finite_toSet s).subset fun ω hω => ?_).countable
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hω
exact hbdd y
theorem memLp_stoppedValue [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ) {N : ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) : MemLp (stoppedValue u τ) p μ :=
memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem integrable_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
Integrable (stoppedValue u τ) μ := by
simp_rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hu ⊢
exact memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu hbdd
variable (ι)
theorem integrable_stoppedValue [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) {N : ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
Integrable (stoppedValue u τ) μ :=
integrable_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset hτ hu fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
end StoppedValue
section StoppedProcess
variable [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
{ℱ : Filtration ι m} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ)
(n : ι) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : MemLp (stoppedProcess u τ n) p μ := by
rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset n hbdd]
refine MemLp.add ?_ ?_
· exact MemLp.indicator (ℱ.le n {a : Ω | n ≤ τ a} (hτ.measurableSet_ge n)) (hu n)
· suffices MemLp (fun ω => ∑ i ∈ s with i < n, {a : Ω | τ a = i}.indicator (u i) ω) p μ by
convert this using 1; ext1 ω; simp only [Finset.sum_apply]
refine memLp_finset_sum _ fun i _ => MemLp.indicator ?_ (hu i)
exact ℱ.le i {a : Ω | τ a = i} (hτ.measurableSet_eq i)
theorem memLp_stoppedProcess [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ) (n : ι) : MemLp (stoppedProcess u τ n) p μ :=
memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n fun _ h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
theorem integrable_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) (n : ι) {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) :
Integrable (stoppedProcess u τ n) μ := by
simp_rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hu ⊢
exact memLp_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n hbdd
theorem integrable_stoppedProcess [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
(hu : ∀ n, Integrable (u n) μ) (n : ι) : Integrable (stoppedProcess u τ n) μ :=
integrable_stoppedProcess_of_mem_finset hτ hu n fun _ h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
end StoppedProcess
end StoppedValueOfMemFinset
section AdaptedStoppedProcess
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
{f : Filtration ι m} {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι}
/-- The stopped process of an adapted process with continuous paths is adapted. -/
theorem Adapted.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hu_cont : ∀ ω, Continuous fun i => u i ω) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Adapted f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
((hu.progMeasurable_of_continuous hu_cont).stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
/-- If the indexing order has the discrete topology, then the stopped process of an adapted process
is adapted. -/
theorem Adapted.stoppedProcess_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(hu.progMeasurable_of_discrete.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem Adapted.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (hu : Adapted f u)
(hu_cont : ∀ ω, Continuous fun i => u i ω) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (n : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ n) :=
(hu.progMeasurable_of_continuous hu_cont).stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess hτ n
theorem Adapted.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology ι]
(hu : Adapted f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (n : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ n) :=
hu.progMeasurable_of_discrete.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess hτ n
end AdaptedStoppedProcess
section Nat
/-! ### Filtrations indexed by `ℕ` -/
open Filtration
variable {u : ℕ → Ω → β} {τ π : Ω → ℕ}
theorem stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum [AddCommGroup β] (hle : τ ≤ π) :
stoppedValue u π - stoppedValue u τ = fun ω =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico (τ ω) (π ω), (u (i + 1) - u i)) ω := by
ext ω
rw [Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub _ (hle ω), Finset.sum_range_sub, Finset.sum_range_sub]
simp [stoppedValue]
theorem stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum' [AddCommGroup β] (hle : τ ≤ π) {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u π - stoppedValue u τ = fun ω =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range (N + 1), Set.indicator {ω | τ ω ≤ i ∧ i < π ω} (u (i + 1) - u i)) ω := by
rw [stoppedValue_sub_eq_sum hle]
ext ω
simp only [Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
ext i
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_Ico]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨lt_trans h.2 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| hbdd _), h⟩, fun h => h.2⟩
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β]
theorem stoppedValue_eq {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) : stoppedValue u τ = fun x =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range (N + 1), Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i)) x :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq (n : ℕ) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
rw [stoppedProcess_eq'' n]
congr with i
rw [Finset.mem_Iio, Finset.mem_range]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq' (n : ℕ) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n + 1 ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), Set.indicator {a | τ a = i} (u i) := by
have : {a | n ≤ τ a}.indicator (u n) =
{a | n + 1 ≤ τ a}.indicator (u n) + {a | τ a = n}.indicator (u n) := by
ext x
rw [add_comm, Pi.add_apply, ← Set.indicator_union_of_not_mem_inter]
· simp_rw [@eq_comm _ _ n, @le_iff_eq_or_lt _ _ n, Nat.succ_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at h₁ h₂
exact (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 h₂).ne h₁.symm
rw [stoppedProcess_eq, this, Finset.sum_range_succ_comm, ← add_assoc]
end AddCommMonoid
end Nat
section PiecewiseConst
variable [Preorder ι] {𝒢 : Filtration ι m} {τ η : Ω → ι} {i j : ι} {s : Set Ω}
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
/-- Given stopping times `τ` and `η` which are bounded below, `Set.piecewise s τ η` is also
a stopping time with respect to the same filtration. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.piecewise_of_le (hτ_st : IsStoppingTime 𝒢 τ) (hη_st : IsStoppingTime 𝒢 η)
(hτ : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) (hη : ∀ ω, i ≤ η ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s) :
IsStoppingTime 𝒢 (s.piecewise τ η) := by
intro n
have : {ω | s.piecewise τ η ω ≤ n} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ n} ∪ sᶜ ∩ {ω | η ω ≤ n} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.piecewise, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
rw [this]
by_cases hin : i ≤ n
· have hs_n : MeasurableSet[𝒢 n] s := 𝒢.mono hin _ hs
exact (hs_n.inter (hτ_st n)).union (hs_n.compl.inter (hη_st n))
· have hτn : ∀ ω, ¬τ ω ≤ n := fun ω hτn => hin ((hτ ω).trans hτn)
have hηn : ∀ ω, ¬η ω ≤ n := fun ω hηn => hin ((hη ω).trans hηn)
simp [hτn, hηn, @MeasurableSet.empty _ _]
theorem isStoppingTime_piecewise_const (hij : i ≤ j) (hs : MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s) :
IsStoppingTime 𝒢 (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) :=
(isStoppingTime_const 𝒢 i).piecewise_of_le (isStoppingTime_const 𝒢 j) (fun _ => le_rfl)
(fun _ => hij) hs
theorem stoppedValue_piecewise_const {ι' : Type*} {i j : ι'} {f : ι' → Ω → ℝ} :
stoppedValue f (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) = s.piecewise (f i) (f j) := by
ext ω; rw [stoppedValue]; by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
theorem stoppedValue_piecewise_const' {ι' : Type*} {i j : ι'} {f : ι' → Ω → ℝ} :
stoppedValue f (s.piecewise (fun _ => i) fun _ => j) =
s.indicator (f i) + sᶜ.indicator (f j) := by
ext ω; rw [stoppedValue]; by_cases hx : ω ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
end PiecewiseConst
section Condexp
/-! ### Conditional expectation with respect to the σ-algebra generated by a stopping time -/
variable [LinearOrder ι] {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ι m} {τ σ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f : Ω → E}
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range h_countable))] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] := by
refine condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range h_countable) (ℱ.le i)
(hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i) fun t => ?_
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_inter_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable [Countable ι]
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_countable)] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable_range hτ (Set.to_countable _) i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable :=
condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq_of_countable
variable [(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated]
theorem condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (i : ι)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace_le)] :
μ[f|(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x ≤ i}] μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] := by
have : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) :=
haveI h_le : (hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace ≤ hτ.measurableSpace := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_min_const]
exact inf_le_left
sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ h_le
refine (condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on hτ.measurableSpace_le
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace_le (hτ.measurableSet_le' i) fun t => ?_).symm
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const :=
condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le_const
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
theorem condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq [FirstCountableTopology ι]
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le)] (i : ι) :
μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x = i}] μ[f|ℱ i] := by
refine condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on hτ.measurableSpace_le (ℱ.le i)
(hτ.measurableSet_eq' i) fun t => ?_
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_inter_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq := condExp_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_eq
theorem condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hσ : IsStoppingTime ℱ σ)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.min hσ).measurableSpace_le)] :
μ[f|(hτ.min hσ).measurableSpace] =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x | τ x ≤ σ x}] μ[f|hτ.measurableSpace] := by
have : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) :=
haveI h_le : (hτ.min hσ).measurableSpace ≤ hτ.measurableSpace := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_min]
· exact inf_le_left
· simp_all only
sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ h_le
refine (condExp_ae_eq_restrict_of_measurableSpace_eq_on hτ.measurableSpace_le
| (hτ.min hσ).measurableSpace_le (hτ.measurableSet_le_stopping_time hσ) fun t => ?_).symm
rw [Set.inter_comm _ t, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_inter_le_iff]; simp_all only
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le := condExp_min_stopping_time_ae_eq_restrict_le
end Condexp
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 1,116 | 1,130 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
| rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 292 | 301 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.